alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive License to ANP 
Technologies, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with 37 CFR 404 et seq., the Department of the 
Army hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to ANP Technologies, 
Inc., 824 Interchange Boulevard, Newark, DE 19711, an exclusive license 
relative to United States Patent <greek-i>6,716,450 entitled 
``Enhancing Protein Activity Through Nanoencapsulation'', Yin, et al., 
issued April 6, 2004. Anyone wishing to object to the granting of this 
license has 15 days from the date of this notice to file written 
objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory, Office of Research and Technology Applications, ATTN: 
AMSRD-ARL-DP-P/Bldg. 434, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, 
Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-24510 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of United Wisconsin Grain Producers,LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/  Robert Miller               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert  Miller                         |
|   | Treasurer  and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:  May 17, 2004              |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2683
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3644
<PP&E>                                           30930
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              387
<BONDS>                                          24267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (751)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1362
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Natrol, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on thedate listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This Certification is providedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Item 601(b)(32) of RegulationS-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and shall not bedeemed part of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall itbe deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 
| Date: May  17, 2004 |                                                      |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   /s/  Dennis R. Jolicoeur                      |   |
|                |   Dennis  R. Jolicoeur                          |
|                |   Chief  Financial Officer and Executive        |
|                |   Vice  President (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Incentra Solutions
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul
McKnight, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    May 16, 2005                 By: /s/ Paul McKnight
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Paul McKnight
                                         Chief Financial Officer



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1. | I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2002-1 Trust and any distribution reports filed in respect of the Trust during the 2009 calendar year; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the period covered by the annual report; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in such reports; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the trust agreement. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONALASSOCIATION               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                              |
|   |                                              |
|   | By: /s/David J. Kolibachuk                        |
|   | Name:  David J. Kolibachuk              |
|   | Title:   Vice President            |
|   | Date:     March 30, 2010 |

----
EXHIBIT 24.1



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW BY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of World Health Alternatives, Inc., a Florida Corporation, does make, constitute and appoint Richard E.
McDonald, with full power and authority his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004, and to file such Annual Report, so signed, with all exhibits thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby further granting unto said attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and
things requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person; the undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney and agent, shall do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED HAS HEREUNTO SET HIS
HAND AND SEAL THIS 15th day of April, 2005.



|                         |  |       
|------------------------ |  | ------
|/s/ John W. Higbee       |  | (SEAL)
|John W. Higbee, Director |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02738-WYD-BNB 

TROY WILLIAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SOUTHWEST CREDIT SYSTEMS, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, 

Defendant. 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal With 

Prejudice (ECF No. 9), filed November 23, 2011. After carefully reviewing the 

above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and this case should 

be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (ECF No. 9) is 

APPROVED. In accordance therewith, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, 

each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated: November 28, 2011 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02738-WYD-BNB Document 10 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Y. R. Bank8, ?FinClorl 

metr1r view atate XOrarl 

an4 m6urt*ial college 

prairie view, texar 

Oear sirt 

notation Qo it ‘for 

t1an for najO?iO King.’ 

vtm prapedy endorseb and mid 

)120.t.10r ar it woo not hell pwpoue to let the 

8l8owt Fe8btllin hem8 an d8j?O8lC. 

"('1 she d 

MV a &teak too 

f 

120.00 and th8 

ca8 18~ paid 010~ to HOP th 8 aamine. EarLr 

the next aorrl~jrg durfng w8akfast hour, rhe 

8lipp8a avay fma 8ChOOl; ma vima her uhereabout8 U8N kZ%Wn, &3 Y88 b to8 U\B61e8, 

CtLlffOrniA, 
347 

v, A. Bmk8 - w$o 2 

mOi8 thB tact8 8.t Wit ti JOUP l@ttW, It 18 

OUP OpitiOll tht AU,$U8t ~O$ftWM $8 tiOt htitbd to a NfbRd Ot th8 

po.00 therein Bentiomd. : 

l?* think tlmt vhen l rtodeat WWO118 la the aolleg8 uad pfir8 th8 -t X'8QUbrd for rsiptMMC-O Uhd tuithlt, 

the 8tUd8Jit U& bo Ultitbd t0 ths Dorrd urd eOUP8*8 Of in8t?UOtic*2 ma fb?, but a0ith.r th@ 8tUdWkt VhO paid the t8e8, 

tlOI M yOf l 18e WhO Mf har8 paid 8m fOF the 8ttrdoat Vatid b8 

entitled to a refund of tha mm prid Upea tha rtudent roluntrri1~ loarmg the 8OhOOl before the uuur808 Qf in8tFUetion paid for 

vere tlal8hed tdo88 the 88h501 Vr@aghll;l FdU8@d $0 F@nhr the 

8wvios8 pal4 far. m1.r couwroial college 7. &W811p, 42 8.W. 

(2) 800. 

EPPlBP 

ze . * 

U8 trwt thtat the abovr MNw% yQur qW8tfOn. 

TOtiF VOmte 

ATTORx%Y OS’IIBIUL oPTJm.8 

x. P. hia* 

A88:8tUbt 

APPF, kg VEXMAY 6, 1943 

ATTORKEY GEUERAL OP Tms
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50841

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Pablo Carrasco-Cortez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:22-CR-59-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Pablo Carrasco-Cortez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following 

deportation. He was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 30 

months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release. For 

the first time on appeal, Carrasco-Cortez argues that the district court 

procedurally erred by failing to explain its reasons for imposing supervised 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50841 Document: 00516734246 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2023
No. 22-50841

2

release in light of U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c), which provides that supervised 

release should “ordinarily” not be imposed where, as here, it is not required 

by statute and the defendant is a deportable alien who is likely to be deported.

Our review is for plain error. See United States v. Dominguez-Alvarado, 

695 F.3d 324, 327 (5th Cir. 2012) (citing United States v. Mondragon–

Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009)). Carrasco-Cortez’s criminal 

history, which includes several convictions for illegal reentry, supports the 

imposition of supervised release. See United States v. Cancino-Trinidad, 710 

F.3d 601, 606-07 (5th Cir. 2013).

1

 Additionally, because Carrasco-Cortez has 

failed to show “a reasonable probability that, but for the district court’s 

misapplication of the Guidelines, he would have received a lesser sentence,” 

any error did not affect his substantial rights. Id. at 606 (internal quotation 

marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, he has not shown plain error, and 

the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

_____________________

1 We have affirmed supervised release terms for defendants with comparable 

criminal histories. See, e.g., United States v. Castro-Delgado, No. 21-50789, 2022 WL 

3229981, *1 (5th Cir. Aug. 10, 2022) (per curiam) (unpublished) (noting that the defendant 

had two felony convictions for the transportation of illegal aliens and had previously been 

deported twice); United States v. Rodriguez-Banda, No. 21-50343, 2022 WL 2752178, *1 

(5th Cir. July 13, 2022) (per curiam) (unpublished) (noting that the defendant’s criminal 

history, “particularly his repeated illegal reentry offenses” supported a term of supervised 

release).

Case: 22-50841 Document: 00516734246 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2023
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2432

RONALD COLLINS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KRISTEN KELLER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:17-cv-01330)

Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 24, 2019

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Collins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin John Robinson, PULLIN, FOWLER, 

FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Collins, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 

complaint filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012). We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment 

or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 1, 2018. The 

notice of appeal was filed on November 15, 2018. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). Because

Collins failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of 

the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40066 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
OSCAR DARIO MEJIA

- DIAZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1334

- 1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS , and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Dario Mejia

Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia

- Diaz h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non frivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 11, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40066 Document: 00512729560 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/11/2014No. 14

- 40066

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40066 Document: 00512729560 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/11/2014
#### WHEELER v. BOWLING.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000719581
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  468842
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  9836082
<DEPRECIATION>                          7746282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2603230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2603230
<SALES>                                 2342500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2342500
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1113957
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1113957
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1113957
<EPS-BASIC>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0


</TABLE>
Order entered March 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00869-CR

JOSE INEZ MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-00328-Y

ORDER

On November 7, 2014, this Court ordered Sharon Hazlewood, former official court 

reporter of the Criminal District Court No. 7, to file the complete reporter’s record by December 

31, 2014. When the record was not filed by January 15, 2015, this Court ordered Ms. 

Hazlewood to file the complete record by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, February 2, 2015. In the more 

than one month that has passed since that date, Ms. Hazlewood has neither filed the record nor 

communicated with the Court regarding the status of the record.

Accordingly, we ORDER Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter of the 

Criminal District Court No. 7, to file the complete reporter’s record, including all exhibits, by 

4:00 p.m. on MONDAY, MARCH 23, 2015. We further ORDER that Sharon Hazlewood not 

sit as a court reporter until the record is filed in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Sharon Hazlewood, 

court reporter; the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE