alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,550
<SECURITIES>                                    12,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                       130
<INVENTORY>                                      5,365
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,985
<PP&E>                                           7,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,503
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,387
<SALES>                                         13,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,509
<CGS>                                            5,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                       880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,333
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,333
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24



</TABLE>
#### W. H. McNAB, also Known as William H. McNab, and Dora H. McNab, His Wife, Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION, a Corporation, Under the Laws of the State of New YorK, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

C. E. Farrington, of Fort Lauderdale, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellants.
Order entered August 28, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-20-00688-CV

IN RE ANTHONY DAVID TEAGUE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-82919-2013

ORDER
Before Chief Justice Burns a nd Justices Myers and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s July 20, 2020

petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12
                                       
                              AMOCO COMPANY
                         ______________________
                                       
               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF
                          EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (millions of dollars, except ratios)

                                                                      
                             Nine                                     
                            Months                                    
                            Ended            Year Ended December 31,
                           Sept. 30, 
                             1998      1997     1996    1995    1994    1993
Determination of Income:                                              
Consolidated earnings                                                 
 before income taxes                                                  
 and minority interest...    $  959  $3,235   $3,351  $2,425  $2,688  $2,427
Fixed charges expensed by                                             
 consolidated companies..       259     282      251     233     140     193
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
  by the equity method...        97      50       76      10       7       9
Adjusted earnings plus                                                
 fixed charges...........    $1,315  $3,567   $3,678  $2,668  $2,835  $2,629
                                                                      
Determination of Fixed Charges:                                       
Consolidated interest on                                              
 indebtedness (including                                              
 interest capitalized)...    $  200  $  212   $  164  $  152  $  127  $  162
Consolidated rental                                                   
 expense representative                                               
 of an interest factor...        62      84       88      71       7      31
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
 by the equity method....        45       7        8       6       5       6
Total fixed charges......    $  307  $  303   $  260  $  229  $  139  $  199
                                                                      
Ratio of earnings to                                                  
 fixed charges...........       4.3*   11.8*    14.2*   11.6    20.4    13.2
                                                                      


*Based  on third-party debt obligations. Including debt with affiliates,
the  ratio  would  have been 2.4 as of September 30,  1998,  5.0  as  of
December 31, 1997 and 5.5 as of December 31, 1996.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wade R. Bradley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 DATE: March 30, 2011
 
 /s/ Wade R. BradleyWade R. BradleyChief Executive OfficerEAU Technologies, Inc.
#### Mozingo *v.*The Marion Steam Shovel Co.

(No. 25757

Decided February 5, 1936.)

*592*Mr, Paul D. Smith*and *Mr. Thomas H. Sutherland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Guthery, Strelits <& Guthery,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-N0271; 71490-1351-0000-L5]


Letters of Authorization To Take Marine Mammals

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 
(MMPA) as amended, notice is hereby given that Letters of Authorization 
to take Pacific walruses and polar bears incidental to oil and gas 
industry exploration activities in the Chukchi Sea and adjacent western 
coast of Alaska have been issued.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Craig Perham at the Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor 
Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Letter of Authorization has been issued to 
the following companies in accordance with Fish and Wildlife Service 
Federal Rules and Regulations (see ``Marine Mammals; Incidental Take 
During Specified Activities'' at 73 FR 33212; June 11, 2008) under 
section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA and the Fish and Wildlife Service 
implementing regulations at 50 CFR 18.27(f)(3):

Letters of Authorization for 2008

 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Company                       Activity               Location                 Date issued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shell Offshore, Inc................  Exploration..........  Open water seismic...  July 7, 2008.
ASRC Energy Services...............  Exploration..........  Marine Survey Program  July 15, 2008.
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.........  Exploration..........  Marine Survey Program  July 22, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Thomas O. Melius,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8-24517 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. R. Brown,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 10, 2006 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NorthPittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF PLATINUM HOLDINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY                                                       INCORPORATION
----------                                                       ---------------
<S>                                                              <C>
Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd..........................     Bermuda
(100% owned by Platinum Holdings)

Platinum Regency Holdings...................................     Ireland
(100% owned by Platinum Holdings)

Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc..........................     Delaware
(100% owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)

Platinum Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc......................     Maryland
(100% owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)

Platinum Administrative Services, Inc.......................     Delaware
(100% owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)

Platinum Re (UK) Limited....................................     United Kingdom
(100% owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99


For Immediate Release                   For Further Information Contact:
Tuesday, September 5, 2000              Robert E. Phaneuf
                                        Vice President - Corporate Development
                                        (918) 592-0101


                   VINTAGE PETROLEUM ANNOUNCES THE PURCHASE
                    OF PROPERTIES IN ARGENTINA'S CUYO BASIN


     Tulsa, Oklahoma - Vintage Petroleum, Inc. announced today that it has
closed the purchase of an interest in two concessions in the Cuyo Basin covering
approximately 104,000 acres in the Mendoza Province of Argentina. Vintage
purchased 100 percent of the interest formerly held by Perez Companc for $39.6
million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments.

     The properties acquired have current net daily production of 2,000 barrels
of 32 degree gravity, light, sweet crude oil and are similar in production and
operating characteristics to the company's existing operations in the San Jorge
Basin of Argentina. Exploitation activities aimed at increasing production are
targeted to begin in the second quarter of 2001.

     "This acquisition marks Vintage's entry as an operator into the western
basins of Argentina and is consistent with our long-term objective of expanding
the company's presence in Argentina.  We plan to apply to the new properties 3-D
seismic-driven development drilling and cost reduction strategies that have
proven successful for us in the San Jorge Basin in Argentina and the United
States," said S. Craig George, CEO.

                                     -More-
<PAGE>

Forward-Looking Statements

     This release includes certain statements that may be deemed to be "forward-
looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995.  All statements in this release, other than statements of
historical facts, that address operating and financial targets, estimates of
capital expenditures, future production, costs, NYMEX reference prices, realized
prices, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments
that the company expects are forward-looking statements.  Although Vintage
believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based
on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future
performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those
in the forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include oil and gas
prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of
capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions.

     Vintage Petroleum, Inc. is an independent energy company engaged in the
acquisition, exploitation, exploration and development of oil and gas properties
and the marketing of natural gas and crude oil.  Company headquarters are in
Tulsa, Oklahoma and its common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol VPI.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129249-50 & (45) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Marilyn Kelly Petitioner-Appellee, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, v SC: 129249 Justices COA: 252288 Wayne CC: 03-304444-AA GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 129250 COA: 252428 Wayne CC: 03-304443-CZ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the mo tion to file brief amicus curiae are considered. The motion to file brief amic us curiae is GRANTED. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of grantin g leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred in considering th e substance of the issues involved in this cas e because, as stated by dissenting Court of Appeals Judge Talbot, those issues are moot in light of the fact that Grosse Pointe Public Schools has paid for the individual educational ev aluation at issue. Although the Court of Appeals correctly cited the test for determining when a moot i ssue ought to be reviewed, i.e., when “the issue is one of public significance that is li kely to recur, yet evade judicial review,” Federated Publications, Inc v Lansing , 467 Mich 98, 112 (2002), we agree with the dissent that the court erred in considering the issues base d on a mere finding that the issues “could” recur and evade judicial review.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

p0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000611 29-MAY-2019 08:16 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 180 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 180

  To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales 
                                 taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Ensign, Mr. 
    Enzi, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Stevens) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide a permanent deduction for State and local general sales 
                                 taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

    Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, as amended by section 103 of division A of the Tax Relief and 
Health Care Act of 2006, is amended by striking ``, and before January 
1, 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATE OF CEO
  (1)
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificate is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Dated: June 30, 2008
    /s/ Gary D. McGahaGary D. McGaha, Chief Executive Officer 19
Exhibit 31.2



Section 302 CEO Certification



CERTIFICATION



I, John Kurz, certify that:



1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pilot Financial, Inc.;



2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report.



4. The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared; and



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such
evaluation.



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 14, 2004



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Kurz                                       
|John Kurz                                           
|Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer