FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A ug. 20, 2008 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 15704 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 07 -000 30 -C R -H L -7 U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s F E R R E L L W A L K E R , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e M id d le D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 20, 2008) B e f o r e T J O F L A T , C A RN E S a n d B A R K E T T , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: A pp el l antpl ed gu i l ty pursuantt o a pl eaagre em entt o an Inform at i on that“It is the law of this circuit that a f ailure to object to alleg ations of fact in a 1 [presentenc e investig ation repor t] admits those fac ts for sentenc ing pur poses” a nd prec ludes the argument that such facts containe d error. United States v. Wade, 458 F .3d 1273, 1277 (11th Cir. 20 06 ). “ Challeng e s tothe[repo rt] mus t bea sserte d withsp e c if ic ity and c larity . . . [o]therwise the objection is waive d. United States v. Bennett, 472 F.3d 825, 832 ( 11th Cir. 2006). 2 c h a r g e d h i m w i th p o s s e s s i o n o f c h i l d p o rn o g r ap h y , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 1 8 U . S. C. § 2252( a ) ( 4) ( B ) , a nd the di s tr i c tc ourts e nt e nc e d hi m t o apr i s on t e rm of 87 m o n th s . H e n o w ap p e a ls h is s e n te n c e , c o n te n d in g th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt in c o rr e c tly c a lc u la te d h is s e n te n c e r a n g e u n d e rth e S e n te n c in g G u id e lin e s b e c au s e it h e ld h im ac coun t abl e f

or po rnog raph i c i m ages thathe had d el et ed fr om hi s c om pu t erbefore he kne w he w a s unde rc r i m i na l i nve s t i ga t i on. A c c or di ngl y , the c ourts houl d ha ve c a lc u la te d h is s e n te n c e r a n g e to in c lu d e o n lyth e im a g e s th a t w e r e c u rr e n tly a c c e s s ib le to h im . A p p e lla n t d id n o t o b

je c t to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e c is io n to h o ld h im a c c ount abl e f

orthe de l e t e d i m a ge s . W e the r e f or e r e vi e w the c ourt ’ s de c i s i on f or p la in e rr o r . W e w ill c o rr e c t ap la in e rr o rw h e n ( 1 ) th e r e is a n e rr o r , ( 2 ) th a t is

1 pl ai n, and (3) thataf

fe ct s s ub st ant i al ri gh t s. B ennett , 47 2 F . 3d at83 1. If al l three cond i t i on s are m et , w e m aythen “ exer ci se i t s di sc re t i on t o n ot i ce a f orfe i t ed error, butonl y i f

( 4) the e rr ors e r i ous l y a f f e c t s the f a i rne s s , i nt e gr i ty , orpubl i c r e put a t i on o f ju d ic ia l p r o c e e d in g s .” U n ite d S ta te s v . R o d r ig u e z , 3 9 8 F .3 d 1 2 9 1 , 1 2 9 8 ( 1 1 th C i r . 2005) . P l a i n e rr orm e a ns a n e rr ortha ti s “ c l e a r ” or“ obvi ous . ” U ni t e d S t a t e s v.3

O la n o . 5 0 7 U .S . 7 2 5 , 7 3 4 , 1 1 3 S .C t. 1 7 7 0 , 1 7 7 7 , 1 2 3 L .E d .2 d 5 0 8 ( 1 9 9 3 ) . “A t a m i ni m um , courtof appeal s c anno tcorr ec tan error . . . un l es s the error i s c l ear unde rc urr e ntl a w . ” I d. “ T he e rr orm us tbe s o ‘ pl a i n’ the tr i a l j udge a nd pr os e c ut or w e r e d e r e lic t in c o u n te n a n c in g it, e v e n ab s e n t th e d e f e n d a n t’s tim e lya s s is ta n c e in de t e c t i ng i t . ” U ni t e d S t a t e s v. F r a dy , 456 U . S . 152, 163, 102 S . C t . 1584, 1592, 71 L . E d. 2d 81 6 (19 82 ). “ W hen n ei ther the S up re m e C ou rtno r thi s C ou rthas r es ol ved a n is s u e , a n d o th e rc ir c u its a r e s p lit o n it, th e r e c a n b e n o p la in e rr o rin r e g a r d to th a t is s u e .” U n ite d S ta te s v . M o r ia rty , 4 2 9 F .3 d 1 0 1 2 , 1 0 1 9 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . G i ven the l ac k o f bi nd i ng autho ri ty on the G ui del i nes- ca l cul at i on -i ss ue pr e s e nt e d, w e c onc l ude tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notpl a i nl y e rrby i nc l udi ng pr e vi ous l y de l e t e d i m a ge s i n the t ot a l num be rof i m a ge s f orpurpos e s of

c a l c ul a t i ng W a lk e r ’s a d v is o ry g u id e lin e r a n g e . AF F I R ME D.