alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02523-RBJ-CBS

BRITTANY THURMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

Deputy ARTHUR PETERSON, individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an 

Employee and/or agent of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Jefferson County, and the 

Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

Sergeant DAVID HOOVER, individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an 

Employee and/or agent of the Lakewood Police Department, the City of Lakewood and the 

Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE in its capacity as the Employer of Deputy Arthur 

Peterson, as an agent and/or independent contractor for Jefferson County and/or as an agent, 

independent contractor/or employer of the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

JEFFERSON COUNTY in its capacity as the employer of Deputy Arthur Peterson, as a 

governmental entity, and/or as an agent, independent contractor or employer of the Jefferson 

County Auto Theft Task Force; 

LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its capacity as the employer of Sergeant David 

Hoover, and as an agent and/or independent contractor of the City of Lakewood and the 

Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

CITY OF LAKEWOOD, in its capacity as the employer of Sergeant David Hoover, as a 

governmental entity and as an agent/or employer of the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

JEFFERSON COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE, in its capacity as a governmental entity 

and as the employer of Arthur Peterson, and David Hoover; 

THE STATE OF COLORADO, in its capacity as a governmental entity and employer of the 

Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force; 

JOHN DOES 1-10, whose names and identities and culpability in the instant matter are yet 

unknown, individually and in their capacity as governmental officers or employees; peace 

officers; and/or agents of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office; the Lakewood Police 

Department; the City of Lakewood, the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force and/or the State 

of Colorado,

Defendants.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB Document 21 Filed 01/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
I hereby recuse myself from further participation in this case and ask that it be reassigned 

to another judge. I see that I entered an order granting an unopposed motion for an extension of 

time earlier in the case. However, until I read the matters presently pending it did not sink in as 

to what this case involves. As a judge in Jefferson County I learned that Deputy Peterson had 

been injured in the incident that is the subject of this case. I wrote a letter to him wishing him a 

full recovery, and received a letter from him in response. To avoid any concern that I might be 

biased, I think the better course is to disqualify myself. 

DATED this 5

th day of January, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB Document 21 Filed 01/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32
Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Chief  Executive and
Financial Officer of Mortgage  Assistance Center  Corporation,  (the "Company"),
during the period covered by this report,  herby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
September  30, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 21, 2005.                             /s/ Dale Hensel
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Dale Hensel
                                                     CEO and CFO
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                          |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Wade      R. Bradley |   |
|   |   | Wade      R. Bradley          |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive Officer  |   |
|   |   | EAU      Technologies, Inc.   |   |

----
Exhibit 2.3

             INCORPORATED UNDER THE CANADA BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT

NO. A-                            CLASS A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SHARES, SERIES 1

                           MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
is the registered  holder of

                               CLASS A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SHARES, SERIES 1 of

                           MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION

The class or  series  of shares  represented  by this  Certificate  has  rights,
privileges, restrictions or conditions attached thereto and the Corporation will
furnish to the holder, on demand and without charge, a full copy of the text of,

      (i)   the rights, privileges,  restrictions and conditions attached to the
            said  shares and to each class  authorized  to be issued and to each
            series insofar as the same have been fixed by the directors, and

      (ii)  the  authority  of the  directors  to fix  the  rights,  privileges,
            restrictions and conditions of subsequent series, if applicable.

RESTRICTIONS  ON TRANSFER.  There are  restrictions on the right to transfer the
shares represented by this Certificate.

IN WITNESS OF WHICH the Corporation has caused this  Certificate to be signed by
its duly authorized officers

this               day of

______________________________                  ________________________________
President                                       Assistant Corporate Secretary

<PAGE>

"The securities  represented by this  instrument have not been registered  under
the United States Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"). Any transfer of
such  securities is  prohibited in the United States or to a U.S.  Person except
(i) pursuant to  registration  under the Securities Act, (ii) only in accordance
with the provisions of Regulation S under the Securities  Act, or (iii) pursuant
to an available exemption from registration under the Securities Act."

"Unless permitted under securities legislation, the holder of this security must
not  trade the  security  before  the date that is 4 months  and a day after the
later of (i)  April 23,  2004 and (ii) the date the  issuer  became a  reporting
issuer in any province or territory."
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00420-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. LUIS MOY,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This will confirm that the change of plea regarding Defendant Moy is set

Wednesday, May 16, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-401, Byron G. Rogers United

States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Defendant must be present.

Dated: April 10, 2012
### TDCJ Offender Details Page 1of2 

# mTDCJ Home 

# El New Offender Search 

# Offender Information Details

SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOS: Maximum Sentence Date: Current Facility: Projected Release Date: Parole Eligibility Date: OffenderVisitation Eligible: 50287002 01883332 WALLACE,LEANN A F 1959-12-20 2029-09-08 LOCKHART PRIV P 2029-09-08 2021-09-08 YES Information providedis updatedonce daily during weekdays andmultiple times perday on visitation days. Because this information is subject to change, familymembers and • friends are encouraged to call the unitpfiorto traveling fora visit.
SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: Offender is not scheduied for release at this time. Scheduled Release Type: Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Scheduled Release Location: Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Offense History: Offense Offense Sentence County Case Sentence (YYDate Date No. MM-DD)
2009-06-23 SEXUALASLT 2013-09-09 JEFFERSON 13- 16-00-00 16428



### http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=50287002 4/23/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
INCLUDED ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,357
<SECURITIES>                                     1,613
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                       109
<INVENTORY>                                      5,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,445
<PP&E>                                           5,868
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,217
<BONDS>                                          6,716
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,287
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,134
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,277)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,446
<SALES>                                         31,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,908
<CGS>                                           15,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,422)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,911)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00392-CR

Brooks L. Burtson

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1340778D)

December 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1817 

To ensure proper administration of the discharge of members of the Armed 

Forces for personality disorder, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2007 

Mr. OBAMA (for himself, Mr. BOND, Mrs. MCCASKILL, Mrs. BOXER, Mrs. 

MURRAY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure proper administration of the discharge of members 

of the Armed Forces for personality disorder, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCHARGE OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

4 FORCES FOR PERSONALITY DISORDER. 

5 (a) TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON DISCHARGES.— 

6 Effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

7 Secretary of a military department may not, except as pro8 vided in subsection (b), discharge from the Armed Forces 

9 for personality disorder any member of the Armed Forces 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 1817 IS

1 (including a member of the National Guard or Reserve) 

2 who has served on active duty in a combat zone until the 

3 later of the dates as follows: 

4 (1) The date of the completion by the Secretary 

5 of Defense of a review of the policies and procedures 

6 of the Department of Defense for diagnosing a per7 sonality disorder in members of the Armed Forces. 

8 (2) The date of the issuance by the Secretary 

9 of Defense of policies and procedures to ensure the 

10 appropriate use of discharge of members of the 

11 Armed Forces for personality disorder, which dis12 charges shall be based on standard clinical diag13 nostic practices, including the practices outlined in 

14 the most recent edition of the Diagnostic Statistical 

15 Manual for Mental Disorders. 

16 (3) The date of the establishment by the Sec17 retary of Defense of an independent review board for 

18 discharges of members of the Armed Forces for per19 sonality discharge, including for members so dis20 charged on or after September 12, 2001, and before 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

22 (4) The date of the submittal by the Secretary 

23 of Defense of a report to Congress on the progress 

24 in implementing the requirements of paragraphs (1) 

25 through (3). 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•S 1817 IS

1 (5) The date that is 45 days after the date of 

2 the submittal of the report referred to in paragraph 

3 (4), which period shall permit Congress to consider 

4 the report. 

5 (b) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in subsection (a) 

6 shall not apply with respect to any member of the Armed 

7 Forces who provided false or misleading information, or 

8 omitted providing information about past criminal behav9 ior, that is material to a discharge for personality disorder 

10 during recruitment for or enlistment in the Armed Forces. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Platform
 Period
 Applicable Servicing Criteria




---



##### 








---



##### 



The Bank of New York Mellon
    
    The Bank of New York MellonThe Bank of New York Mellon Trust
    
    The Bank of New York Mellon TrustCompany, N.A.
    
    Company, N.A.BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware/s/ Robert L. Griffin
    
    /s/ Richard P. StanleyRobert L. Griffin
    
    Richard P. StanleyAuthorized Signatory
    
    Authorized Signatory
 The Bank of New York Mellon
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A./s/ Alex P. TsarnasAlex P. TsarnasAuthorized Signatory
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 9/30/95
INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          13,950
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,747,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                    97,891
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,844,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,442,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        46,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     794,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,844,185
<SALES>                                          2,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               480,673
<CGS>                                            2,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                38,633
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                165,948
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            113,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   113,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00117

- CV

JUSTIN GRIFFIN, Appellant

V.

LARRY MCCATHRAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 0895

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant, Justin Griffin , has filed a motion with this Court seeking to voluntarily

dismiss h is appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the

motion is granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal

.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: April 9, 2018

Date Decided: April 10, 2018
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1255
LARRY ARDINGER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND; WASHINGTON COUNTY, MARYLAND, Board of County Commissioners, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv01029-AMD) Submitted: January 5, 2007 Decided: February 5, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. William Michaels, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Jonathan R. Topazian, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Ardinger appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Washington County, Maryland, and the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland, on Ardinger’s sexual harassment, gender discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ardinger v. Washington County , No. 1:05-cv-01029-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

Director Compensation Program 

Under our director compensation program, we pay our non-employee directors retainers in cash. Each non-employee director receives a cash
retainer for service on the board of directors and for service on each committee on which the director is a member. These fees are payable quarterly in arrears and are as follows: 

Cash Fees 
  

									
	 	  	Member
Annual Fee	 	  	Chairman
Annual Fee	 
	 Board of Directors
	  	$	35,000	  	  	$	70,000	  
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	7,000	  	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	7,000	  	  	$	15,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	3,500	  	  	$	7,500	  

 Equity Fees 

Our director compensation program also includes a stock-for-fees policy, under which directors have the right to elect to receive common stock
in lieu of cash fees. The number of shares to be issued to participating directors is determined on a quarterly basis by dividing the cash fees to be issued in common stock by the fair market value of our common stock, which is the closing price of
our common stock, on the first business day of the quarter following the quarter in which the fees were earned. 
 Under our director
compensation program, upon their initial election to the board of directors, new non-employee directors receive an option grant for 70,000 shares and all non-employee directors, other than the chairman, receive an annual option grant for 35,000
shares. The chairman is entitled to an annual option grant for 52,500 shares. The annual grants are made on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. These options vest quarterly over three years from the date of grant, subject to continued
service as a director, and are granted under our 2013 Stock Incentive Plan. These options are granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of our common stock, which is the closing price of our common stock, on the date of grant and
become immediately exercisable in full if there is a change in control of our company.