alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52321-52322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-1720-000]


Dry Lake Wind Power II LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 18, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Dry Lake Wind Power II LLC application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is August 27, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://

[[Page 52322]]

www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bafcffe8f9f5d4d6d3d4dfe9cfcacad5c8cefadcdfc8d994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="397f7c6b7a76575550575c6a4c4949564b4d795f5c4b5a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-21074 Filed 8-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2







Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I, Glen
R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the
“Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.











Dated:
      May 17, 2010
            By:
      /s/ Glen R. CharlesGlen R. CharlesChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial andAccounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,336
<SECURITIES>                                    11,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                       130
<INVENTORY>                                      6,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,534
<PP&E>                                           7,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,248
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,054
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,413
<SALES>                                         28,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,201
<CGS>                                           10,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,080
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,312
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES--OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Light  Management  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Donald Iwacha, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes--Oxley  Act
of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Donald Iwacha
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Donald Iwacha,
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 21, 2003
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Gastar Exploration, Ltd.

Houston, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-142123 and 333-140397) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-130867) of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the
effectiveness of Gastar Exploration Ltd.s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.

BDO Seidman, LLP

Dallas, TX

March 13, 2009
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 

18, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00462-CV

IN RE NATHAN BRADLEY HANKINS, Relator 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 328th District Court 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 18-DCV-251355 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On June 10, 2019, relator Nathan Bradley Hankins filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Supp.); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable John 

R. Millard, presiding judge of the 328th District Court of Fort Bend County, to vacate 
2 

his May 17, 2019 order requiring relator to pay interim attorney’s fees of $38,800. 

.

Relator also has filed a motion for temporary relief, asking this court to stay 

this order pending a decision on his petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10.

With certain exceptions not applicable in this proceeding, to obtain mandamus 

relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and 

that the relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. In re Prudential 

Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); In re 

Garza, 544 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Relator 

has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. We therefore deny relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus and motion for stay. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Spain and Poissant.
#### The State, ex rel. The Peoples Savings & Loan Co. of Lisbon, *v.*Lemley, Dir. of Pub. Service of City of East Palestine.

(No. 25454

Decided June 19, 1935.)

*Mr. Hugh Ramsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Everett L. Lyon*and *Mr. W. B. Moore,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 008 18

- CR

Mark Anthony GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR2731A

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant ’ s brief is due June 6, 2014 . No further extensions of time granted.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2017

p0117

Order 

Clerk

January 24, 2017

154116

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154116

COA: 324668

Wayne CC: 14-005563-FC

RUSSELL ROBERSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment 

addressing the scoring of Offense Variable 7 (OV 7), MCL 777.37. The trial court record 

does not reveal an assessment of a base level of fear or anxiety associated with the 

offense of assault with intent to murder, and does not include a determination whether the 

defendant’s conduct was intended to increase the victim’s fear or anxiety by a 

considerable amount. See People v Hardy, 494 Mich 430, 442-443 (2015). We 

REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to make the determinations required 

under Hardy for deciding whether points should be assigned for OV 7, using the version 

of the sentencing guidelines in effect on the date that the sentencing offense was 

committed. MCL 769.34(2). If, after making the determinations required under Hardy, 

the circuit court determines that OV 7 was correctly scored, it shall implement the relief 

ordered by the Court of Appeals pursuant to People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358, 398-399 

(2015). If the circuit court determines that zero points should have been assigned for OV 

7, it shall resentence the defendant. People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82 (2006). In all 

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 33.2

                REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING
                 CRITERIA PURSUANT TO ITEM 1122 OF REGULATION AB
                     FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT CARD CENTER, INC.

                                                       Date: March 28, 2008

     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First National Credit
Card Center, Inc. (the "Servicer"), hereby certifies as follows:

     (1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing its compliance with the
servicing criteria set forth in 17 C.F.R. Section 229.1122(d) ("Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB"), except for servicing criteria specified in (1)(iii); (2)(iii)
and (vi); 3(iii) and (iv); and 4(x) of Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, which the
Servicer has determined are inapplicable to the activities it performs with
respect to the credit card asset backed securities transactions issued by First
National Master Note Trust (the "Platform") being serviced (such applicable
criteria, after giving effect to the exceptions identified above, the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007
relating to the servicing of the Platform;

     (2) The Servicer used the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria;

     (3) The Servicer is in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
relating to the Platform as of and for the year ending December 31, 2007 in all
material respects; and

     (4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Servicer's
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for
the year ending December 31, 2007.




<PAGE>



                                         FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD
                                         CENTER, INC.



                                         By    /s/ Stephen F. Eulie
                                             ---------------------------
                                               Stephen F. Eulie
                                               President





                                         FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD
                                         CENTER, INC.



                                         By    /s/ Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                             ---------------------------
                                               Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                               Chief Financial Officer

















              [Signature page to Report on Assessment of Compliance
                   of First National Credit Card Center, Inc.]
#### Laura Boardman SPRAGUE et al., Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN DALLAS, a National Banking Corporation of Dallas, Texas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Baynard & Baynard, of St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Bussey, Mann & Barton, of St. Peters-burg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellants.
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12
                                       
                              AMOCO COMPANY
                         ______________________
                                       
               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF
                          EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (millions of dollars, except ratios)

                                                                      
                             Nine                                     
                            Months                                    
                            Ended            Year Ended December 31,
                                     
                           Sept. 30, 
                             1997      1996     1995    1994    1993    1992
Determination of Income:                                              
Consolidated earnings                                                 
 before income taxes                                                  
 and minority interest...    $2,328  $3,351   $2,425  $2,688  $2,427  $1,823
Fixed charges expensed by                                             
 consolidated companies..       201     251      233     140     193     238
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
  by the equity method...        39      76       10       7       9      18
Adjusted earnings plus                                                
 fixed charges...........    $2,568  $3,678   $2,668  $2,835  $2,629  $2,079
                                                                      
Determination of Fixed Charges:                                       
Consolidated interest on                                              
 indebtedness (including                                              
 interest capitalized)...    $  147  $  164   $  152  $  127  $  162  $  219
Consolidated rental                                                   
 expense representative                                               
 of an interest factor...        65      88       71       7      31      20
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
 by the equity method....         6       8        6       5       6      12
Total fixed charges......    $  218  $  260   $  229  $  139  $  199  $  251
                                                                      
Ratio of earnings to                                                  
 fixed charges...........      11.8*   14.2*    11.6*   20.4    13.2     8.3
                                                                      


*Based  on  debt obligations excluding debt with affiliates.   Including
debt with affiliates, the ratio would have been 4.9 as of September  30,
1997, 5.5 as of December 31, 1996, and 4.4 as of December 31, 1995.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1466

MR. PASCAL N. NOUNA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WILBUR ROSS, Secretary Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standard and Technology , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8 : 13

- cv
- 01927

- RWT )

Submitted : September 29, 2017 Decided: October 10 , 2017

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Pascal N. Nouna, Appellant Pro Se. Molissa Heather Farber, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinio ns are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Pascal N. Nouna appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment
discrimination complain

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proc eed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Nouna v. Ross , No. 8:13

- cv
- 01927

- RWT (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2017)

. We deny Nouna’s request for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
#### Henry MOORE v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

May 27, 2015

Hon. Michael W. Morris

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Mr. Mark Anthony Moncada Estrada

TDCJ #1568684

McConnell Unit

3001 S. Emily Drive

Beeville, TX 78102 Hon. Ricardo P. Ro driguez

Hidalgo County District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00283

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR

- 712

- 08

- C

Style: MARK ANTHONY MONCADA ESTRADA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pro Se’s motion to appoint attorney in the above cause was this day DENIED by

this Court. Pro Se ’ s motion for rehearing in the above cause was this day DENIED by

this Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch