alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   report  of  Energroup   Technologies
Corp.,(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,
(the  "Report"),  I(We),  Stephen R. Fry,  President  and Director and Thomas J.
Howells,  Secretary and Director, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By/S/Stephen Fry
-------------------------------
Stephen R. Fry
President and Director
Dated this 1st day of August, 2005.



By/S/Thomas Howells
-----------------------
Thomas J. Howells
Secretary and Director
Dated this 9th day of August, 2005.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB

DALIP BASANTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,

JASON ROZESKI, M.D.,

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, and

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 101, filed

2/5/2013]. Following a hearing yesterday, I made rulings on the record which are incorporated

here.

The parties have agreed to pay a reasonable rate for travel time incurred by Dr. Huffman

in appearing in Colorado for his deposition. No relief is requested from me in connection with

that agreement. 

I am not aware of any authority allowing me to require a party to compensate a local

expert for travel time to appear at a lawyer’s office for deposition, and I will not require such

payment. 

The parties have encountered a problem concerning whether an expert should be paid for

time reserved for a deposition or only for the time actually expended in conducting the

deposition. To resolve the dispute, I will require that any party intending to examine another

Case 1:11-cv-02765-PAB-NYW Document 116 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

party’s expert provide in advance of the deposition an estimate of the amount of time of

examination. The party examining must pay the expert for the greater of the time reserved or the

time of examination.

In addition, at the parties’ request the case schedule is modified to the following extent:

Discovery Cut-Off: May 20, 2013.

(All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All

written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or

before the discovery cut-off.)

Dispositive Motions Deadline: June 20, 2013.

 Expert Disclosures:

(a) The defendants shall designate all experts and

rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with

all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)

on or before March 1, 2013.

(b) The plaintiff shall designate all rebuttal experts and

provide opposing counsel with all information

specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before

March 28, 2013. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated February 21, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02765-PAB-NYW Document 116 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Order entered October 15, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00675-CV

ROSCOE F. "TREY" WHITE, III, WHITE VENTURES ENERGY LLC, AND TRIPROPERTIES, LTD., Appellants

V.

MICHAEL POTTORFF AND MONICA FABBIO, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF 

INVESTORS GROUP, LLC F/K/A WE INVESTORS GROUP, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-00751-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ October 10, 2014 second unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 26, 2014. No further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998 
<CASH>                                             944 
<SECURITIES>                                     5,601 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,801 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                     11,317 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,257 
<PP&E>                                          37,310 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,437 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,384 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,545 
<BONDS>                                          3,309 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                            41 
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,802 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,384 
<SALES>                                          8,639 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,639 
<CGS>                                            6,222 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,785 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (44)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (82)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (82)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
<FN>                                           
<F1>note: receivables shown net of allowance of 365
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1


                        [LETTERHEAD OF CROWE & DUNLEVY]




                               February 14, 2000



Canaan Energy Corporation
119 N. Robinson, Suite 600
Oklahoma City, OK 73102


Gentlemen:


          We have acted as counsel to Canaan Energy Corporation ("Company") in
connection with registration under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended ("Act")
of 5,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.10 per share ("Common Stock")
of the Company to be issued and sold in connection with the proposed Plan of
Combination among the Company, Indian Oil Company, Canaan Securities, Inc.,
certain affiliated partnerships of the Company and various other parties.

          A Registration Statement under the Act with respect to the 5,000,000
shares of common stock is being filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about February 14, 2000.

          We have examined and are familiar with originals or copies, the
authenticity of which has been established to our satisfaction, of all such
documents, corporate records and other instruments as we have deemed necessary
to express the opinion hereinafter set forth.  Based on the foregoing comment,
it is our opinion that the 5,000,000 authorized but unissued shares of Common
Stock of the Company to be issued in the manner described in the Registration
Statement will, upon issuance thereof in exchange for the consideration
described in the Plan of Combination be validly issued, fully paid and non-
assessable.

          We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the above
mentioned Registration Statement and for the use of our name in such
Registration Statement and the Prospectus/Proxy included therein under the
heading "Legal Matters".

                              Respectfully submitted,

                              CROWE & DUNLEVY,
                              A Professional Corporation



                              By: /s/ Michael M. Stewart
                                  ----------------------
                                     Michael M. Stewart
MMS:jh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,922
<SECURITIES>                                       634
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,577
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         928,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 918,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        712,970
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              135
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,700
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   918,238
<SALES>                                          7,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,079
<CGS>                                            6,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,723)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,723)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)


</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 7, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.213 Corporate Equities1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1679 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1679

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide that the great hall of the Capitol Visitor Center shall be 
                      known as Emancipation Hall.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GREAT HALL OF THE CAPITOL VISITOR CENTER AS 
              EMANCIPATION HALL.

    (a) In General.--The great hall of the Capitol Visitor Center shall 
be known and designated as ``Emancipation Hall'', and any reference to 
the great hall in any law, rule, or regulation shall be deemed to be a 
reference to Emancipation Hall.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply on and after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate November 15, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1679

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide that the great hall of the Capitol Visitor Center shall be 
                      known as Emancipation Hall.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH FTR – Courtroom A501

Date: February 12, 2013 Cathy Pearson, Courtroom Deputy

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Iris Halpern

 William Moench

Plaintiff,

v.

WENDY J. CABRERA, Kent Eichstadt

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v.

THE ORIGINAL HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY Benson Pope (by phone)

OF GEORGIA, INC., Katherine Dix

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING

Court in session: 10:09 a.m.

The Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. 

Discussion regarding amending the Court’s Order (Doc. 241, filed 11/7/12) to show that Plaintiff

shall receive documents first, redact privileged information, create a privilege log, and send the

Court the complete set of documents with the privilege log and redacted privileged

communications. 

Argument and discussion regarding Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion for Resolution of Discovery

Dispute and Proposed Protocol and Search Term List (Doc. 276, filed 12/31/12).

Discussion regarding apportionment of costs for the Special Master and production of

electronically stored information and whether oral argument is needed on Defendant’s motion

for sanctions. 

Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 323 Filed 02/12/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff EEOC’s Motion for Resolution of Discovery Dispute and

Proposed Protocol and Search Term List (Doc. 276, filed 12/31/12) is

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated on the record. 

2. Plaintiff EEOC’s brief regarding apportionment of costs for the Special

Master and production of electronically stored information, as well as the

proposed order for the Court’s signature regarding discovery ordered

today, is due by close of business on February 20, 2013; Defendant’s

response to apportionment of costs is due by noon (12:00 p.m. Mountain

Time) on February 22, 2013. 

3. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for February 25, 2013, at 3:00

p.m. Counsel shall first conference together and then contact the Court’s

chambers at (303)844-4507 at the time of the hearing. 

4. Oral argument on Defendant HBH’s Motion for Sanctions Under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 37 against Plaintiff EEOC for Failure to Comply in Good Faith

with the Court’s Order (Doc. 267, filed 12/12/12) is set for February 21,

2013, at 3:00 p.m.

Court in recess: 1:34 p.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 3:25

Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 323 Filed 02/12/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
----

| Subsidiaries -      Direct/Wholly-owned |   | State of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                    |   |                   |
| Florida      Community Bank             |   | Florida                |
|                                    |   |                   |
| FCBI      Capital Trust I               |   | Delaware               |
|                                    |   |                   |
| FCBI      Capital Trust II              |   | Delaware               |
|                                    |   |                   |
| Concordia      Cape Coral II, LLC       |   | Florida                |
|                                    |   |                   |
| Van      Loon Commons II, LLC           |   | Florida                |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED BY SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Natrol, Inc. (the “Company”) for the periodended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on thedate listed below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This Certification shallnot be deemed part of the report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever, norshall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 |                                   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/ Wayne M. Bos                       |
|                    | Wayne M. Bos                           |
|                    | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |

 

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1541 

To allow for expanded uses of funding allocated to Louisiana under the 

hazard mitigation program while preserving the goals of the program 

to reduce future damage from disasters through mitigation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To allow for expanded uses of funding allocated to Louisiana 

under the hazard mitigation program while preserving 

the goals of the program to reduce future damage from 

disasters through mitigation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing for Com5 monsense Rebuilding Act of 2007’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1541 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF RESTRICTION ON USE OF 

2 AMOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), and 

4 notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Adminis5 trator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

6 shall not prohibit the use by the State of Louisiana under 

7 the Road Home Program of that State of any amounts 

8 described in subsection (c), based upon the existence or 

9 extent of any requirement or condition under that pro10 gram that— 

11 (1) limits the amount made available to an eli12 gible homeowner who does not agree to remain an 

13 owner and occupant of a home in Louisiana; or 

14 (2) waives the applicability of any limitation de15 scribed in paragraph (1) for eligible homeowners 

16 who are elderly or senior citizens. 

17 (b) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Except as provided in sub18 section (a), section 404 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

19 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c) 

20 shall apply to amounts described in subsection (c) that are 

21 used by the State of Louisiana under the Road Home Pro22 gram of that State. 

23 (c) COVERED AMOUNTS.—The amounts described in 

24 this subsection are any amounts provided to the State of 

25 Louisiana because of Hurricane Katrina of 2005 or Hurri26 cane Rita of 2005 under the hazard mitigation grant proVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:16 Jun 06, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1541.IS S1541

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•S 1541 IS

1 gram of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

2 under section 404 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re3 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c). 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12
                                       
                              AMOCO COMPANY
                         ______________________
                                       
               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF
                          EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                     (millions of dollars, except ratios)

                                                                      
                            Three                                     
                            Months                                    
                            Ended            Year Ended December 31,
                                     
                           March 31, 
                             1997      1996     1995    1994    1993    1992
Determination of Income:                                              
Consolidated earnings                                                 
 before income taxes                                                  
 and minority interest...    $  771  $3,351   $2,425  $2,688  $2,427  $1,823
Fixed charges expensed by                                             
 consolidated companies..        59     251      233     140     193     238
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
  by the equity method...         3      76       10       7       9      18
Adjusted earnings plus                                                
 fixed charges...........    $  833  $3,678   $2,668  $2,835  $2,629  $2,079
                                                                      
Determination of Fixed Charges:                                       
Consolidated interest on                                              
 indebtedness (including                                              
 interest capitalized)...    $   40  $  164   $  152  $  127  $  162  $  219
Consolidated rental                                                   
 expense representative                                               
 of an interest factor...        21      88       71       7      31      20
Adjustments for certain                                               
 companies accounted for                                              
 by the equity method....         2       8        6       5       6      12
Total fixed charges......    $   63  $  260   $  229  $  139  $  199  $  251
                                                                      
Ratio of earnings to                                                  
 fixed charges...........      13.2*   14.2*    11.6*   20.4    13.2     8.3
                                                                      


*Based  on public debt obligations. Including debt with affiliates,  the
ratio  would have been 5.1 as of March 31, 1997, 5.5 as of December  31,
1996, and 4.4 as of December 31, 1995.