alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WELLS FARGO                                WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT
                                           54101-076 MAC
                                           100 West Washington Avenue, 7th Floor
                                           Phoenix, AZ  85003
                                           602-378-2478
                                           602-378-6215 Fax



May 12, 2000



Roger Butterwick
AutoTradeCenter.Com, Inc.
8135 East Butherus, Suite 3
Scottsdale, AZ  85260

Dear Mr. Butterwick:

According to Section 6.13 of the Credit and Security  Agreement dated March 26,
1999 (the "Agreement") by and between AutoTradeCenter.Com, Inc. fka Auto Network
Group, Inc., an Arizona  corporation (the "Borrower"),  and Wells Fargo Business
Credit,  Inc. fka Norwest  Business Credit,  Inc., a Minnesota  corporation (the
"Lender"),  the Borrower will achieve a net loss for the quarter ended March 31,
2000 of no more than $250,000.00.  The Borrower has represented and warranted to
Lender that it has violated  Section 6.13 of the Agreement for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000. This result  constitutes an Event of Default pursuant to Section
8.1 of the Agreement.

According to Section 6.13 of the  Agreement,  the Borrower will achieve net loss
for the  fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  2000 of no more than  $760,000.00.  The
Borrower has  represented  and warranted to Lender that it has violated  Section
6.13 of the  Agreement  for the fiscal  year ended March 31,  2000.  This result
constitutes an Event of Default pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Agreement

According to Section 6.14 of the Agreement, the Borrower will achieve a net loss
for each month of no more than $125,000.00. For the month of March 31, 2000, the
Borrower has  represented  and warranted to Lender that it has violated  Section
6.14 of the Agreement.  This result  constitutes an Event of Default pursuant to
Section 8.1 of the Agreement.

According to Section  7.10 of the  Agreement,  the  Borrower  will not expend or
contract to expend more than  $1,200,000.00  in capital  expenditures for fiscal
year 2000.  The Borrower  has  represented  and  warranted to Lender that it has
violated  Section 7.10 of the  Agreement.  This result  constitutes  an Event of
default pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Agreement.

As an accommodation to Borrower, Lender hereby agrees to waive the violations of
Sections  6.13,  6.14,  and 7.10 of the  Agreement for the month,  quarter,  and
fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 as described  herein.  This waiver applies only
to the  violation of Sections  6.13,  6.14,  and 7.10 of the  Agreement  for the
month,  quarter and fiscal year ended March 31, 2000 as described herein and not
to any other existing or future defaults of any kind. Lender reserves all rights
and remedies allowed it under the Agreement. If you have any questions regarding
this matter, please feel free to contact me at (602) 378-2469.

If you have any questions regarding this matter,  please feel free to contact me
at (602) 378-2469.

Sincerely,


/s/Darcy Della-Flora

Darcy Della-Flora
Vice President
Exhibit
23.3





THIRD
PARTY REVIEWER CONSENT





We
consent to the reference to us in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, and the Registration Statements on Form S-3ASR (No.
333-145919), Form S-4 (No. 333-130682) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-96995,
33-60095 and 33-60099) of Hecla Mining Company.  In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are within the category of persons whose
consent is required by Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.








/s/  Scott
Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.





February
4, 2010
EXHIBIT 10.15
 PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2011)
 Section 1. Purpose
   Section 2. Definitions




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Section 3. Shares Available under the Plan
 Aggregate Number of Shares Available for Awards
 Per Grantee Limitation on Share-Based Awards.
 Per Grantee Limitation on Other Awards.
  3




---



##### 



Section 4. Administration of the Plan
 Authority of the Administrator
           4




---



##### 



Manner of Exercise of Administrator Authority.
 Limitation of Liability.
 Section 5. Awards.
 Type of Awards
 Terms and Conditions of Awards
  5




---



##### 



Section 6. Terms Relating to Options.
 Generally.
 Vesting.
 Exercise Price.
 Termination of Options.
  Exercise of Options.
 Transferability.
 Option Grant Guidelines.
  6




---



##### 



Section 7. Terms Relating to Awards of Shares and Share Units.
 Grant and Restrictions.
 Forfeiture.
 Dividends.
 Share Units.
  7




---



##### 



Section 8. Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization
  Section 9. Restrictions on Shares.
 Restrictions on Issuing Shares.
 Transfer of ISO Shares.
 Certificates for Shares.
 Section 10. Acceleration of Vesting.
   8




---



##### 



Section 11. Performance Awards
 Performance Awards Granted to Designated Covered Employees.
 Performance Goals Generally.
 Business Criteria.
 Performance Period; Timing for Establishing Performance Award Terms.
  9




---



##### 



Performance Award Pool.
 Settlement of Performance Awards; Other Terms.
 Impact of Extraordinary Items or Changes in Accounting.
 Written Determinations.
 Status of Section 11(a) Awards under Section 162(m) of the Code.
  10




---



##### 



Section 12. General Provisions
        11




---



##### 



Section 13. Effective Date; Amendment or Termination
     12
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------






                                      13
<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                  CWABS MASTER TRUST, SERIES 2002-C SUBTRUST,
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2002-C


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

      (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
      Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
      such year.




/s/Joseph M. Candelario                         Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER


/s/ Mark Wong                                   Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      14
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Urban von Euler, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 24Holdings Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  May 23, 2005


By:  /s/ Urban von Euler
     ---------------------------------------
     Name:    Urban von Euler
     Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [ES-956-1420-BK-TRST, ES-055523 Group 20, North Carolina]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; North Carolina.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

*Contact Information:*                         Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153.                         *Attn:*                         Cadastral Survey.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The plat represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the Cathcart Tract, lands held in trust by the United States of America for the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians in Swain County, North Carolina. The survey was accepted on September 10, 2008.

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. We will not officially file the plat until the day after we accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and prepayment of the reproduction fees.

                        Dated:                         *September 16, 2008.*

Ronald J. Eberle,

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

 [FR Doc. E8-23510 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 15, 2004.
                              By       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                              ------------------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth I. Denos
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>



   <ARTICLE> 5
          
   <S>                            <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
   <PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1998
   <CASH>                             962,123
   <SECURITIES>                             0
   <RECEIVABLES>                    1,731,890
   <ALLOWANCES>                             0
   <INVENTORY>                         80,049
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,022,539
   <PP&E>                           1,671,101
   <DEPRECIATION>                   1,337,523
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   4,271,938
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              414,730
   <BONDS>                                  0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
   <PREFERRED>                              0
   <COMMON>                         2,813,248
   <OTHER-SE>                       1,017,296
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     4,271,938
   <SALES>                            352,889
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,871,207
   <CGS>                            1,311,251
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   491,870
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     613
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                    268,251
   <INCOME-TAX>                        79,657
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
   <DISCONTINUED>                           0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
   <CHANGES>                                0
   <NET-INCOME>                       200,145
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                          .07
   <EPS-DILUTED>                          .06
           
   
</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JERRY LEE KEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. John T. Copenhaver, Jr

. , District Judge. ( 2:97

- cr
- 00033

- 1 )

Submitted : February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jerry Lee Key , Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Jennifer Rada Herrald , Assistant U nited S tates Attorney s, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Key appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reimbursement of a $1000 fine ordered as part of his 1997 sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm . We have reviewed the record and find no r eversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Key , No. 2:97

- cr
- 00033

- 1 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1788 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1788

  To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals 
     whose child support payments are more than $2,500 in arrears.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2007

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the mandatory revocation of passports of individuals 
     whose child support payments are more than $2,500 in arrears.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY REVOCATION OF PASSPORTS OF INDIVIDUALS WHOSE CHILD 
              SUPPORT PAYMENTS ARE MORE THAN $2,500 IN ARREARS.

    Section 452(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 652(k)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``, revocation, or 
        limitation'' and inserting ``or revocation''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``may revoke, restrict, 
        or limit'' and inserting ``shall revoke''.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 25, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D22-483 & 3D22-488

Lower Tribunal No. 19-28710

________________

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Odalys Fortes, etc.,

Appellee.

Appeals from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, William Thomas, Judge.

Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Richard 

Schevis, Assistant County Attorney, for appellant Miami-Dade County; 

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., and James M. Fishman, for 

appellant Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

Armand & Dieguez, P.A., and Arturo A. Armand and Manuel A. 

Dieguez; Raposo & Lukacs, PLLC, and John C. Lukacs, Jr., and Jose A. 

Raposo, Jr., for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. 
2

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 

and Miami-Dade County appeal a February 21, 2022 non-final order denying 

appellants’ motions seeking summary judgment on the issue of whether they 

are sovereignly immune from the wrongful death action brought by appellee

Odalys Fortes, as personal representative of the Estate of Annie Becerra. 

The challenged order also recites the legal duty that, according to the trial 

court, appellants owed to Ms. Becerra.1

We dismiss, for lack of jurisdiction, that portion of the appeal seeking 

interlocutory review of the trial court’s order determining the legal duty 

appellants owed to Ms. Becerra. See 1560-1568 Drexel Ave., LLC v. Dalton, 

323 So. 3d 273, 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (recognizing that a district court’s 

jurisdiction to review a portion of a non-final order does not extend to the 

portion of the same order not included in rule 9.130’s schedule of reviewable 

non-final orders); Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3). We affirm the trial court’s 

determination that appellants are not sovereignly immune from appellee’s 

claims. Fla. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, Div. of Highway 

1 According to the summary judgment order, appellants “owed a common 

law duty to render aid to the injured victim of an accident that they are or 

should be aware of when they undertake to respond to and investigate the 

accident.”
3

Patrol v. Kropff, 491 So. 2d 1252, 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“A governmental 

entity is not immune from liability where, as in the instant case, a member of 

its police force fails to use reasonable care in the performance of an 

operational level function.”); see Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River 

Cnty., 371 So. 2d 1010, 1021 (Fla. 1979) (“Planning level functions are 

generally interpreted to be those requiring basic policy decisions, while 

operational level functions are those that implement policy.”).

Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.