alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (BEFORE FIXED CHARGES) TO COMBINED FIXED
CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCKDIVIDENDS
(In thousands, except ratios)
(Unaudited)
  Three MonthsEnded
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,March 31, 2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Fixed charges
    
    $
    71,493
    
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    5,064
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,259
    
    
    
    20,273Combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    76,557
    
    
    $
    295,904
    
    
    $
    255,777
    
    
    $
    127,165
    
    
    $
    65,198
    
    
    $
    79,197Fixed charges
    
    $
    71,493
    
    
    $
    275,648
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924Income from continuing
operations
    
    
    30,147
    
    
    
    24,713
    
    
    
    3,843
    
    
    
    17,195
    
    
    
    39,869
    
    
    
    58,666$
    101,640
    
    
    $
    300,361
    
    
    $
    239,364
    
    
    $
    124,104
    
    
    $
    84,808
    
    
    $
    117,590Ratio of income from
continuing
operations (before fixed
charges) to combined fixed
charges and preferred
stock dividends
    
    
    1.33:1
    
    
    
    1.02:1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30:1
    
    
    
    1.48:1Deficiency of income from
continuing operations
(before fixed charges) to
combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    16,413
    
    
    $
    3,061
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 202 (Friday, October 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-20-000]


Dynegy Marketing and Trade; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 10, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Dynegy Marketing and Trade's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 30, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#71373423323e1f1d181f14220401011e030531171403125f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6b0b3a4b5b9989a9f9893a5838686998482b690938495d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24660 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Nolton HUNGERFORD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44439.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1971.

*243Bob C. Hunt, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., Phyllis Bell and Ronald G. Woods, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

The record reflects that appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the court on April 16, 1969, on a charge of assault with intent to murder. The punishment was assessed at five years and appellant was placed on probation. No appeal was taken from this conviction.

One of the conditions of probation was that he violate no laws of the State of Texas.

On October 9, 1970, a hearing was held on the state’s first amended petition to revoke probation in that the appellant had violated the above condition of his probation.

Appellant’s sole complaint on appeal is “the judgment and sentence which is the basis for appellant’s present confinement is void on its face in that it does not reflect that appellant was guilty of any offense against the laws of the State of Texas.” The judgment reflects “the defendant having been indicted in the above numbered and entitled cause for the felony offense of assault to.murder . . . the court . finds the defendant guilty of the offense of assault to murder . . . ”

This is a collateral attack upon the judgment and sentence upon which the probation was granted and is without merit. McAlpine v. State, 462 S.W.2d 315 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Higdon v. State, 436 S.W.2d 541 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Hoskins v. State, 425 S.W.2d 825 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Campbell v. State, 420 S.W.2d 715 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Chavez v. State, 375 S.W.2d 729 (Tex.Cr.App.1964).

The order revoking probation is affirmed.

ODOM, J., not participating.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ciprico Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Merrifield, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  December 26, 2007 | /s/  Steven D. Merrifield |   |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                           | Steven  D. Merrifield     |
|                           | Chief  Executive Officer  |
|                           |                      |

 

----
#### The Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., *v.*Planck.

(No. 25658

Decided October 23, 1935.)

*Mr. J. R. Kistner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. G. A. Wilmot,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Matthias and Day, JJ., not participating.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: BENJAMIN JOSEPH

GUTIERREZ

,

Re lator

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 1 86

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

Pending before this Court is the Relator ’ s motion to stay trial court proceedings. The

motion to stay is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDE RED this 23 rd day of October , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald R. Cysewski, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

2)                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | February 20, 2007                     |   | /s/ | Gerald R. Cysewski |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|-----|--------------------|--------|
|   | Gerald R. Cysewski                    |
|   | Chairman of the Board of Directors,   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 10, 2008
    /s/ Jeffrey T. BentonJeffrey T. BentonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer 32
| Subsidiary                                                                                                                                                                             | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Platinum      Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. ............................(100%      owned by Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.)                    | Bermuda                            |
| Platinum      Regency Holdings ........................................(100%      owned by Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.)  | Ireland                            |
| Platinum      Underwriters Finance, Inc. ..............................(100%      owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)                         | Delaware                           |
| Platinum      Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. .......................(100%      owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)                          | Maryland                           |
| Platinum      Administrative Services, Inc.............................(100%      owned by Platinum Underwriters Finance, Inc.)                   | Delaware                           |
| Platinum      Re (UK) Limited ............................................(100%      owned by Platinum Regency Holdings)          | United      Kingdom                |
| Platinum      UK Services Company Limited ........................(100%      owned by Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd.)                            | United      Kingdom                |
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 6, 2008*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**R.100 Change in Net Worth of Households and Nonprofit Organizations** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Fletcher WILLIAMS v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<PAGE>- 21 -

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          BEN & JERRY'S HOMEMADE, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (In thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Thirteen weeks ended  Twenty-six weeks ended
                                                   --------------------  ----------------------
                                                   June 26,    June 27,   June 26,    June 27,
                                                      1999        1998       1999       1998
                                                   --------    --------   --------    --------
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Numerator:
      Net income                                     $3,214      $2,130     $4,411      $2,510
                                                     ------      ------     ------      ------
Denominator:
      Denominator for basic earnings per share-
          weighted-average shares                     7,128       7,245      7,119       7,244

      Dilutive employee stock options                   500         300        471         254
                                                     ------       -----      -----       -----

      Denominator for diluted earnings per share-
          adjusted weighted-average shares and
          assumed conversions                         7,628       7,546      7,590       7,498
                                                     ======      ======     ======      ======

      Net income per common share
          Basic                                       $0.45       $0.29      $0.62       $0.35
                                                      =====       =====      =====       =====
Diluted                                               $0.42       $0.28      $0.58       $0.33
                                                      =====       =====      =====       =====
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6535

NICHOLAS E. CARDEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAVIS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:08-cv-00171-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: June 16, 2008 Decided: July 11, 2008

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas E. Carden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas E. Carden moves for a certificate of

appealability, seeking to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Carden has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. In addition, we

deny Carden’s motions for appointment of counsel and for relief

audita querela, his “Motion to Request Order from Court to Consider

Petition,” and all other pending motions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Dynatronics Corporation on Form
10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Terry M. Atkinson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                             /s/ Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                                           Chairman, President & Chief Executive
                                           Officer
                                           Dynatronics Corporation



                                             /s/ Terry M. Atkinson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Terry M. Atkinson, CPA
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Dynatronics Corporation



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02749-CMA-KLM

KIMBERLY ADAIR,

Plaintiff,

v.

EL PUEBLO BOYS & GIRLS RANCH, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

 a/k/a “Your Group Employee Benefits Plan,” a/k/a Plan Number G204821/00001,

 also left specifically unnamed in an addendum To Summary Plan Description,

Defendant.

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE

This matter comes before the Court upon review of the file. Pursuant to

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.5 and 40.1A, with the approval and consent of Chief Judge Wiley Y.

Daniel, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be transferred to Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel.

DATED: September 18 , 2012

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02749-WYD-KLM Document 30 Filed 09/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          92,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  619,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,400)
<INVENTORY>                                    556,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,396,800
<PP&E>                                       4,345,800
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,315,900)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,936,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,258,100
<BONDS>                                      1,327,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          200,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,492,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,936,000
<SALES>                                     13,971,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,971,200
<CGS>                                        8,957,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,957,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,575,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                314,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   131,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            173,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.00


</TABLE>