alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martinez

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00373-WJM-01

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. CONARD KERN,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR MORE SPECIFICITY

AND RESETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

On December 12, 2011, Defendant Conard Kern filed a Motion to Suppress

Statements and Evidence and a Motion for Hearing. (ECF No. 30 & 31.) The Court

granted Defendant’s Motion for Hearing and set an evidentiary hearing on the Motion to

Suppress for January 11, 2012. (ECF No. 34.) 

In its response to the Motion to Suppress, the Government responded to

Defendant’s specific allegation that his statement was taken in violation of his Miranda

rights. (ECF No. 35 at 1-2.) However, with respect to the rest of the Defendant’s

Motion, the Government “requests that the Defendant be required to supplement the

motion with a more particular identification of the evidence to be suppressed and the

legal basis for suppression.” (ECF No. 35 at 3.) The Government claims that it could

then provide a more focused response. 

Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 36 Filed 12/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

The Court has reviewed Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and agrees with the

Government that it is too broad and cursory to allow the Government to respond

meaningfully. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Defendant to file a supplemental motion

to suppress that includes a more detailed description of the precise evidence sought to

be suppressed and the legal basis for such suppression. Defendant’s supplemental

motion to suppress shall be filed no later than January 6, 2012. The Government’s

response to the supplemental motion to suppress shall be filed by January 13, 2012. 

No reply will be permitted.

Because the Court is ordering additional briefing on the Motion to Suppress, the

evidentiary hearing must be rescheduled. The Court’s January 11, 2011 evidentiary is

VACATED and RESET to commence at 9:00 a.m. on January 23, 2012 in Courtroom

A801. Counsel is advised to consult the undersigned’s practice standards regarding

exhibit binders and other related topics before the evidentiary hearing. 

Dated this 29 day of December, 2011. th

BY THE COURT:

 

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 36 Filed 12/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 171 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.171

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICKEY MANTLE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mickey Mantle Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mickey 
Mantle Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triple-S ManagementCorporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the annual period ended December 31,2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and;2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.        Date: March 20, 2007 By:  /s/ Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas     Ramón M. Ruiz-Comas    *President and Chief Executive Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (199)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,714
<PP&E>                                         118,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                  62,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           453
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,531
<SALES>                                         17,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,294
<CGS>                                           12,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.71
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE ORIGINAL HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY OF GEORGIA, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 3 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Johnson *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 25735

Decided January 2, 1936.)

*Mr. Price Jcmson*and *Mr. Paul Van Nostran,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George N.*Graham, prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. A. C. L. Barthelmeh,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 for Hallwood Energy  Partners,  L.P. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000768172
<NAME> HALLWOOD ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,234
<PP&E>                                         605,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                 514,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,818
<SALES>                                         13,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00289-CR

IN RE JASON LANG MODGLING

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Lang Modgling, a prison inmate, seeks a mandamus to compel the 

Honorable Matt Johnson of the 54th District Court to rule on Modgling’s motion for 

judgment nunc pro tunc. There are numerous procedural problems with this petition 

including, but not limited to, that the petition was not served on the respondent, the 

trial court judge, or the real party in interest, the State, and there is no record containing 

the documents on which the requested relief is based or certification as required. TEX. R.

APP. P. 9.5; 52.2; 52.3(j),(k); 52.7. However, we use Rule 2 to overlook these and other 

deficiencies and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

Modgling alleges in his petition that he filed his motion for judgment nunc pro 

tunc on July 21, 2012. Although the need to consider and rule on a properly filed and 
In re Modgling Page 2

presented document is ordinarily not a discretionary act but a ministerial one, a trial 

court is, nevertheless, allowed a reasonable time within which to perform that act. In re 

Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228-229 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). We 

determine that in this case the trial court has not had a reasonable time to rule. 

Modgling’s petition is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed August 23, 2012

Do not publish 

[OT06]
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1701 

To provide for the extension of transitional medical assistance (TMA) and 

the abstinence education program through the end of fiscal year 2007, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To provide for the extension of transitional medical assistance (TMA) and the abstinence education program 

through the end of fiscal year 2007, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 1701 CPS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TRANSITIONAL MEDICAL AS2 SISTANCE (TMA) AND ABSTINENCE EDU3 CATION PROGRAM THROUGH THE END OF 

4 FISCAL YEAR 2007. 

5 Section 401 of division B of the Tax Relief and 

6 Health Care Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–432) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘June 30’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep9 tember 30’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘third quarter’’ each place it ap11 pears and inserting ‘‘fourth quarter’’. 

12 SEC. 2. SUNSET OF THE LIMITED CONTINUOUS ENROLL13 MENT PROVISION FOR CERTAIN BENE14 FICIARIES UNDER THE MEDICARE ADVAN15 TAGE PROGRAM. 

16 Section 1851(e)(2)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 

17 U.S.C. 1395w–21(e)(2)(E)), as added by section 206(a) 

18 of division B of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 

19 2006, is amended— 

20 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘2007 or 2008’’ 

21 and inserting ‘‘the period beginning on January 1, 

22 2007, and ending on July 31, 2007,’’; and 

23 (2) in clause (iii)— 

24 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘YEAR’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘THE APPLICABLE PERIOD’’; and 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•S 1701 CPS

1 (B) by striking ‘‘the year’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘the period described in such clause’’. 

3 SEC. 3. OFFSETTING ADJUSTMENT IN MEDICARE ADVAN4 TAGE STABILIZATION FUND. 

5 Section 1858(e)(2)(A)(i) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1395w–27a(e)(2)(A)(i)), as amended by 301 

7 of division B of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 

8 2006, is amended by striking ‘‘the Fund during the pe9 riod’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘the Fund— 

10 ‘‘(I) during 2012, 

11 $1,600,000,000; and 

12 ‘‘(II) during 2013, 

13 $1,790,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### KLOSE v. KLOSE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion,
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtntteb ~tates ((ourt of ~peaIs

for tbe jfeberaI ((treutt

RICHARD REBSTOCK,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7169

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in 12-1171, Judge Robert N. Davis.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Richard Rebstock moves for leave to proceed in forma

pauperIS.

Rebstock is incarcerated. Pursuant to the Prisoner

Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this court may not authorize the prosecution of an appeal by a prisoner without the

prepayment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A prisoner is no

Case: 12-7169 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 10/19/2012
RICHARD REBSTOCK v. SHINSEKI 2

longer afforded the alternative of proceeding without

payment of filing fees, but must, in time, pay the $450

filing fee in its entirety. When funds exist, an initial

partial payment must be made consisting of 20% of the

greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account or (b) the average monthly balance in the

prisoner's account for the six-month period immediately

preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. §

1915(b)(1). Thereafter, the prisoner is required to make

monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. 28 U.S.C. §

1915(b)(2). The agency with custody of the prisoner must

forward payments from the prisoner's account each time

the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $450

filing fee is paid in full. Id.

By separate letter, the custodian of Rebstock's prison

account is being directed to make the necessary arrangements to forward the filing fee to the court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT

Rebstock's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s24

Case: 12-7169 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 10/19/2012
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION FURNISHEDPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K/A of Techwell, Inc. (the “Company”) for theannual period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mark Voll, VicePresident, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of hisknowledge, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: April 30,  2010 |                                                                     |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                     |
|                       | /s/ Mark Voll                                                            |
|                       | Mark Voll                                                                |
|                       | Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1


               HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES ANNOUNCES FIRST QUARTER RESULTS

Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (OTCBB: HBSI) announces its results of operations
for the first quarter of 2005.

Highlands Bankshares' first quarter 2005 operations produced net income of
$849,000 compared to $712,000 for the first quarter of 2004, an increase of
19.24%. Net income for the first quarter of 2005 produced an annualized return
on average assets (ROAA) of 1.13% compared to an ROAA of .95% for the same
period in 2004. Annualized return on average equity (ROAE) was 10.70% compared
to 9.54% ROAE for the first quarter of 2004.

Total assets have increased 2.15% from December 31, 2004 and total $306,456,000
at March 31, 2005. The company experienced a 2.14% increase (8.67% on an
annualized basis) in loan balances from December 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005.

During the quarter Highlands paid dividends to its shareholders of 20 cents per
share.

Commenting on the first quarter results, Butch Porter, President and Chief
Executive Officer said, "We are very pleased with the continuing trend in strong
earnings for Highlands. Return on both assets and equity continues to increase
as we more closely manage our balance sheet in an attempt to maximize return for
our shareholders. Loan growth remains strong, creating increases in net interest
income. Continuing our recent trend of profitability growth will remain a
challenge for the Company as competition for both loans and deposits seems to
increase on an almost daily basis. However, even with the presence of this
highly competitive marketplace, we look forward to a successful remainder of
2005."

Highlands Bankshares Inc. is a financial holding company operating 9 banking
locations in West Virginia and Virginia through its two wholly owned subsidiary
banks, The Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank and insurance services
through its wholly owned subsidiary HBI Life Insurance Company.

Certain statements in this release may constitute "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions,
expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not
statements of historical fact. Although the Company believes that its
expectations with respect to certain forward-looking statements are based upon
reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its existing knowledge of its
business and operations, there can be no assurance that actual results,
performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. The Company does not update any forward-looking
statements that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of Balqon
Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:May
      21, 2009
                
                
                /s/
      BALWINDER SAMRABalwinder
      Samra
                    Chief
      Executive Officer (principal executive
officer)
  Dated: May
      21, 2009
                  
                  
                  /s/
      ROBERT MIRANDARobert
      Miranda
                      Chief
      Financial Officer (principal financial
      officer)
 A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-210-1430-ES; NMNM 118070]


Correction to Notice of Realty Action--Recreation and Public 
Purposes (R&PP) Act Classification, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Federal Register [73 FR 50342] on Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 
make the following correction. Under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
heading, the legal description should read:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 29 N., R. 12 W.,
    Sec. 18, SW of lot 9.

    Containing 10 acres, more or less.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Jo Albin, Realty Specialist, at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Farmington Field Office, at (505) 599-
6332.

Joel E. Farrell,
Assistant Field Manager for Resources, Farmington.
[FR Doc. E8-24253 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-VB-P
#### Tom PAYNE v. STATE.

6 Div. 710.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 7, 1935.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appeal dismissed.