alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### FI LED U.S. COURT O F APP EALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Ma y 2 5, 2005 THO MAS K. KAH N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 04- 1227 1 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D.C. Dock et No. 0 3- 00 06 4- CR-1 -DHB
UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Plaintiff-Appellee,
ve rs us DERRICK M ALCOM MORGAN, a. k. a. D er ri ck Ma lc olm Mo rg an , a.k .a. W ayne Mo rg an , etc ., D ef en da nt- A ppe lla nt.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ A ppe al f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D ist ri ct

Co urt f or the So uth er n D ist ri ct of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (M ay 2 5, 200 5) Be fo re H U L L , W IL SO N a nd P RY O R, Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

Perc y J. Blount, appoin ted counsel for De rrick Ma lcolm

Morgan , in this direct
cr im ina l a ppe al , ha s m ove d to w ith dr awf ro m f urthe r re pr es en ta tio n of the appe lla nt
an d f ile d abr ie f pur sua nt t o A nd ers v. Ca lif or nia , 386 U
. S. 738 , 87 S
. Ct
. 139 6, 18 L. Ed. 2d 49 3 (1967). O ur independent reviewof the ent i re record r eveals that
co unse l’ s a sse ssm en t of the r el at ive m er it of

the appe al is co rr ec t. B ec au se i n d ep en d en t ex amin at i o n o f t h e re co rd re v ea l s n o i s s u es o f a rg u ab l e mer i t , c o u n s el ’s
m oti on t o w ith dr awis GRANTED, and Morgan’ s convictio n and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1




                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
I, Jacinta Sit, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


/s/ Jacinta Sit
----------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President and CFO
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)


Dated: January 6, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00425-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. FRANCISCO FRANCO-OROZCO,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This will confirm that a status/scheduling hearing regarding Defendant FrancoOrozco is set Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C401, Byron G.

Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Defendant must

be present. An interpreter is required.

Dated: October 28, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ZACHARY LEE JOHNSTON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 000 14

- CR

Appeal from the

168 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 20170D0 3893 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE , 20 22

.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### Walter MURPHY v. STATE

8 Div. 27.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 21, 1935.

SAMFORD, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON ) No. 79873-1-I

) Respondent, ) DIVISION ONE

)

v.

)

JOHN MATTHEW LAIR, )

) UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

_____________________________ ) FILED: December23, 2019

PER CURIAM — John Lair appeals the term of supervised probation

imposed following his guilty plea to attempted voyeurism. He contends, and the

State concedes, that the sentencing court lacked authority to impose DOC

supervision for attempted voyeurism. ~ RCW 9.94A.501 (1) and (6); In re

Childers, 135 Wn. App. 37, 40-41, 143 P.3d 831 (2006). In its concession, the

State adds that “[p]er the judgment and sentence, the term of supervised

probation should be converted to unsupervised probation.” In his reply, Lair

accepts the State’s concession.

Lair also requests remission or a refund of any funds DOC collected from

him in relation to the unauthorized supervision. See RCW 9.94A.780. Lair is

entitled to be placed in the same position he would have been in had the error in

his sentence not occurred. State v. Smissaert, 103 Wn.2d 636, 638, 694 P.2d

654 (1985).
No. 79873-1-1/2

We accept the State’s concession and remand with directions to convert

the term of DOC supervised probation to unsupervised probation and to order

DCC to refund any funds collected from Lair for supervision intake, monthly

supervision fees, or any other funds related to the term of unauthorized

supervision.

FOR THE COURT: /1/1/)

j~ VoAV~Lv~

2
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Hon. John S. Mostyn

Attorney at Law

3810 West Alabama St.

Houston, TX 77027-5204

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Ray R. Ortiz

Jones, Andrews & Ortiz, PC

10100 Reunion Place, Suite 600

San Antonio, TX 78216

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00520-CV

Tr.Ct.No. C-4764-14-D

Style: In Re State Farm Lloyds and Richard Freymann

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed please find the opinion issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: 206th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Laura Hinojosa, Hidalgo County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 159 

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of 

Vermont as the ‘‘Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area 

in the State of Vermont as the ‘‘Robert T. Stafford 

White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL 

4 RECREATION AREA. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The White Rocks National 

6 Recreation Area in the State of Vermont, as established 

7 by section 202 of the Vermont Wilderness Act of 1984 

8 (16 U.S.C. 460nn–1), is redesignated as the ‘‘Robert T. 

9 Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 159 CPS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the recreation area referred to in subsection (a) 

4 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Robert T. Stafford 

5 White Rocks National Recreation Area. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC75 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: October 30, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 30, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and 

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Victor Sampson, Petitioner, against Wilfred L. Denno, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

April 19, 1957.

*Victor Sampson,*petitioner in person.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harold Borgwald*of counsel), for respondent.

Arthur D. Brennan, J.

In this application for a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to vacate and expunge from the court records a judgment of conviction and sentence to State prison on the ground that at the time he was sentenced on July 26, 1945 he was 20 years of age and his sentence was in violation of article 3-A of the Correction Law.

It is his contention that he was illegally committed to State prison and instead he should have been received in the reception center pursuant to article 3-A of the Correction Law. He is correct in his statement that article 3-A (L. 1945, ch. 554) became effective April 1, 1945. However, section 61 of article 3-A, as it read in 1945, provided that ‘ Any male offender between the ages of sixteen and twenty-one years, convicted on or after November first, nineteen hundred forty-five ” shall be committed to the department reception center for classification, etc. As the petitioner was convicted prior to November 1,1945 he was properly sentenced to State prison. The petitioner also relies upon the provisions of section 2184-a of the Penal Law but that section as it read at the time of his sentence in 1945 would not be applicable to sustain his present contentions. (L. 1932, ch. 414, as amd. by L. 1950, ch. 525.)

Accordingly the application is denied, the writ dismissed and the petitioner remanded. Submit order.
Order issued November ~, 2012 

## 00480S

In The

No. 05-12-01125-CV 

### YERMA RICE, Appellant

V. PINNWELL INVESTMENT LLC, Appellee



### ORDER By order issued October 11, 2012, we denied as premature Yerma Rice’s "motion for extension of time to file brief letter." We construed her motion as referring to the brief on the merits, which was not yet due because the appellate record had not yet been filed. The motion, however, referred to a letter brief we requested addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we VACATE our October 11; 2012 order. Because the jurisdictional brief remains due, we GRANT the extension motion and ORDER Rice to file her letter brief no later than November 21, 2012. 

### Appellee shall file its response no later than December 3, 2012.

MOLLY JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification of CFO under Section 1350

 

Icertify that this periodic report containing the issuer’s financial statementsfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained In this periodic report fairly presents in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  John F Coger                                  |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | John  F Coger                                      |
|   |   | Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | March 24,  2004                               |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEWIS WRIGHT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 69 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Truman, Gdn., *v.*United States Veterans Administration.

(No. 25579

Decided December 18, 1935.)

*Miss Marie B. Wing,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. M, Barlow,*for defendant in error.

*336It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error he, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32-1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. ss.1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of Cosi, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended January 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Armstrong, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company and I, William Koziel, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: March 15, 2006 /s/ KEVIN ARMSTRONG   Kevin Armstrong   President and
|Exhibit 99 (a)                         
|---------------------------------------
|Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2
|                                       
|                                       
|Original Principal Class A             
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)        
|Original Principal Class M             
|Number of Class M Bonds (000's)        
|                                       
|Distribution Date                      
|                                       
|                                       
|CLASS A                                
|Class A Principal Distribution         
|Class A Interest Distribution          
|                                       
|CLASS M                                
|Class M  Principal Distribution        
|Class M  Interest Distribution         
|                                       
|                                       
|                                       
|
#### Antonio CERVANTES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 44283.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 23, 1971.

*32T. P. Henley, San Antonio (on appeal only), for appellant.

Ted Butler, Dist. Atty., Charles Cam-pion, and Lucien B. Campbell, Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for the offense of burglary; punishment assessed by the court at 3 years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged. Pursuant to Article 1.15, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., the state offered written stipulations of testimony, such stipulations were agreed to by the appellant in writing in open court and approved by the trial judge. The stipulations reflect that on May 30, 1970, Officer Briggs, of the San Antonio Police Department, received a call for a silent burglar alarm at the City Lumber Company in San Antonio. Upon arrival at that location he encountered the appellant and a juvenile companion coming over the fence enclosing the lumber yard. The building and a coke machine inside bore signs of forcible entry. A kitchen knife and $5.70, all in dimes, nickels and some pennies, were recovered from appellant’s companion. Latent fingerprints lifted from inside at the point of entry into the building were found to be identical to appellant’s fingerprints. An affidavit of the owner of the lumber yard stated that the premises were broken into without his consent and that corporeal personal property therein being and belonging to him and in his possession was taken from him without his consent.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction.

Appellant’s contention that “the indeterminate sentence law under which this Appellant was sentenced was unconstitutional, in that, it is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain,” is without merit. McSwain v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 432.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on January 14, 2010, 9 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

*Portion open to the public:*      ( print page 1089)    

(1) Executive Committee Reports.

*Portion closed to the public:*

(A) Employer Status Determination—Employee Service Determination—Decision on Remand—Former Police Officers of MTA.

The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: January 5, 2010.

Beatrice Ezerski,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-210 Filed 1-6-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61795 

[FR Doc. E8–24431 Filed 10–16–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–90] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–90 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.015</GPH> 
61796 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.028</GPH> 
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61797 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.029</GPH> 
61798 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–24452 Filed 10–16–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.030</GPH> 
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61799 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–88] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–88 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner
of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		March 9, 2007
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-104319 (Form S-8 for an aggregate 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par
value pertaining to the Amended and Restated Cosi Stock Incentive Plan and the
Cosi Sandwich Bar, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan) of our report dated
February 19, 2003, except for Note 17 as to which the date is March 31, 2003,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 30, 2002, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                             /s/ Ernst and Young LLP

New York, New York
April 29, 2003