Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices 59679 

f. Any person who has petitioned or 

intends to petition for leave to 

intervene. 

In accordance with 10 CFR 51.26, the 

scoping process for an EIS may include 

a public scoping meeting to help 

identify significant issues related to a 

proposed activity and to determine the 

scope of issues to be addressed in an 

EIS. The NRC has decided to hold 

public meetings for the KPS license 

renewal supplement to the GEIS. The 

scoping meetings will be held at the 

Carlton Town Hall, N 1296 Town Hall 

Road, Kewaunee, WI 54216 on October 

22, 2008. There will be two sessions to 

accommodate interested parties. The 

first session will convene at 1:30 p.m. 

and will continue until 4:30 p.m., as 

necessary. The second session will 

convene at 7 p.m. with a repeat of the 

overview portions of the meeting and 

will continue until 10 p.m., as 

necessary. Both meetings will be 

transcribed and will include: (1) An 

overview by the NRC staff of the NEPA 

environmental review process, the 

proposed scope of the supplement to the 

GEIS, and the proposed review 

schedule; and (2) the opportunity for 

interested government agencies, 

organizations, and individuals to submit 

comments or suggestions on the 

environmental issues or the proposed 

scope of the supplement to the GEIS. 

Additionally, the NRC staff will host 

informal discussions one hour prior to 

the start of each session at the same 

location. No formal comments on the 

proposed scope of the supplement to the 

GEIS will be accepted during the 

informal discussions. To be considered, 

comments must be provided either at 

the transcribed public meetings or in 

writing, as discussed below. Persons 

may register to attend or present oral 

comments at the meetings on the scope 

of the NEPA review by contacting the 

NRC Environmental Project Manager, 

Ms. Sarah Lopas, by telephone at 1– 

800–368–5642, extension 1147, or by email at sarah.lopas@nrc.gov no later 

than October 17, 2008. Members of the 

public may also register to speak at the 

meeting within 15 minutes of the start 

of each session. Individual oral 

comments may be limited by the time 

available, depending on the number of 

persons who register. Members of the 

public who have not registered may also 

have an opportunity to speak, if time 

permits. Public comments will be 

considered in the scoping process for 

the supplement to the GEIS. Ms. Lopas 

will need to be contacted no later than 

October 15, 2008, if special equipment 

or accommodations are needed to attend 

or present information at the public 

meeting, so that the NRC staff can 

determine whether the request can be 

accommodated. 

Members of the public may send 

written comments on the environmental 

scope of the KPS license renewal review 

to: Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and 

Editing Branch, Division of 

Administrative Services, Office of 

Administration, Mailstop T–6D59, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, and 

should cite the publication date and 

page number of this Federal Register 

notice. Comments may also be delivered 

to the NRC, Room T–6D59, Two White 

Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, Maryland 20852, from 7:30 

a.m. to 4:15 p.m. during Federal 

workdays. To be considered in the 

scoping process, written comments 

should be postmarked by December 8, 

2008. Electronic comments may be sent 

by e-mail to the NRC at 

Kewaunee.EIS@nrc.gov, and should be 

sent no later than December 8, 2008, to 

be considered in the scoping process. 

Comments will be available 

electronically and accessible through 

ADAMS at http:// 

adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. 

Participation in the scoping process 

for the supplement to the GEIS does not 

entitle participants to become parties to 

the proceeding to which the supplement 

to the GEIS relates. Notice of 

opportunity for a hearing regarding the 

renewal application was the subject of 

the aforementioned Federal Register 

notice (73 FR 57154). Matters related to 

participation in any hearing are outside 

the scope of matters to be discussed at 

this public meeting. 

At the conclusion of the scoping 

process, the NRC will prepare a concise 

summary of the determination and 

conclusions reached, including the 

significant issues identified, and will 

send a copy of the summary to each 

participant in the scoping process. The 

summary will also be available for 

inspection in ADAMS at http:// 

adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. 

The staff will then prepare and issue for 

comment the draft supplement to the 

GEIS, which will be the subject of 

separate notices and separate public 

meetings. Copies will be available for 

public inspection at the abovementioned addresses, and one copy per 

request will be provided free of charge. 

After receipt and consideration of the 

comments, the NRC will prepare a final 

supplement to the GEIS, which will also 

be available for public inspection. 

Information about the proposed 

action, the supplement to the GEIS, and 

the scoping process may be obtained 

from Ms. Lopas at the aforementioned 

telephone number or e-mail address. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day 

of October 2008. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Brian Holian, 

Director, Division of License Renewal, Office 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E8–23944 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–250 and 50–251] 

Florida Power and Light Company; 

Notice of Issuance of Amendment to 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

and Final Determination of No 

Significant Hazards Consideration 

(TAC Nos. MD9229 and MD9330) 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC or Commission) has 

issued Amendment Nos. 238 and 233 to 

Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–31 

and DPR–41, respectively, issued to 

Florida Power and Light Company (the 

licensee), which revised the Technical 

Specifications (TSs) for operation of the 

Turkey Point Nuclear Plant, Units 3 and 

4, located in Miami-Dade County, 

Florida. The amendment was effective 

as of the date of its issuance. 

These amendments remove the notes 

associated with License Amendment 

No. 221 regarding the inoperability of 

the Unit 4 Rod Position Indication (RPI) 

system for control rod F–8 in Shutdown 

Bank B, and the notes associated with 

Amendment No. 230 regarding the 

inoperability of the Unit 3 RPI system 

for control rod M–6 in Control Bank C. 

The RPI system for control rod F–8 was 

repaired during the Unit 4 Cycle 22 

refueling outage in spring 2005; thus, 

the associated TS License Amendment 

No. 221 revisions are no longer 

required. Similarly, the RPI system for 

control rod M–6 was repaired in June 

2007; thus, the associated TS License 

Amendment No. 230 revisions are no 

longer required. 

The application for the amendment 

complies with the standards and 

requirements of the Atomic Energy Act 

of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the 

Commission’s rules and regulations. 

The Commission has made appropriate 

findings as required by the Act and the 

Commission’s rules and regulations in 

10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in 

the license amendment. 

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendment and Proposed No 

Significant Hazards Consideration 

Determination and Opportunity for 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
59680 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices 

Hearing in connection with this action 

was published in the Federal Register 

on July 29, 2008 (73 FR 43956). A 

request for a hearing was filed on 

August 18, 2008, by Thomas Saporito, 

President of Saporito Energy 

Consultants. 

Under its regulations, the Commission 

may issue and make an amendment 

immediately effective, notwithstanding 

the pendency before it of a request for 

a hearing from any person, in advance 

of the holding and completion of any 

required hearing, where it has 

determined that no significant hazards 

consideration is involved. 

The Commission has applied the 

standards of 10 CFR 50.92 and has made 

a final determination that the 

amendment involves no significant 

hazards consideration. The basis for this 

determination is contained in the Safety 

Evaluation related to this action. 

Accordingly, as described above, the 

amendment has been issued and made 

immediately effective and any hearing 

will be held after issuance. 

The Commission has determined that 

this amendment satisfies the criteria for 

categorical exclusion in accordance 

with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant 

to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental 

impact statement or environmental 

assessment need be prepared for this 

amendment. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for 

amendment dated September 5, 2007, as 

supplemented by letter dated September 

8, 2008, which are available for public 

inspection at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at One 

White Flint North, Public File Area O1 

F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 

records will be accessible electronically 

from the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System’s 

(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the Internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ 

adams.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS should contact the 

NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone 

at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or 

by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day 

of September, 2008. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Brenda L. Mozafari, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch II–2, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E8–23945 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 50–266 and 50–301] 

FPL Energy Point Beach LLC; Notice 

of Withdrawal of Application for 

Amendment to Renewed Facility 

Operating Licenses DPR–24 and DPR– 

27 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (the Commission) has 

granted the request of FPL Energy Point 

Beach, LLC (the licensee) to withdraw 

its December 29, 2007, application for 

proposed amendment to Renewed 

/Facility Operating License Nos. DPR– 

24 and DPR–27 for Point Beach Nuclear 

Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, located in 

Town of Two Creeks, Manitowoc 

County, Wisconsin. 

The proposed amendment would 

have revised the Technical 

Specifications for the Point Beach 

Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Units 1 and 2 

Technical Specifications (TS) 

requirement for the completion time 

(CT) of TS 3.7.5.C. This revision would 

allow two separate one-time extensions 

of the CT for TS 3.7.5.C from 7 days to 

16 days. 

The Commission had previously 

issued a Notice of Consideration of 

Issuance of Amendment published in 

the Federal Register on January 28, 

2008 (73 FR 5220). However, by letter 

dated August 21, 2008, the licensee 

withdrew the proposed change. 

For further details with respect to this 

action, see the application for 

amendment dated December 29, 2007, 

and the licensee’s letter dated August 

21, 2008, which withdrew the 

application for license amendment. 

Documents may be examined, and/or 

copied for a fee, at the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR), located at One 

White Flint North, Public File Area O1 

F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 

Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available 

records will be accessible electronically 

from the Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading 

Room on the internet at the NRC Web 

site, http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm.html. Persons who do not have 

access to ADAMS or who encounter 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS should contact the 

NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone 

at 1–800–397–4209, or 301–415–4737 or 

by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day 

of September 2008. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Jack Cushing, 

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing 

Branch III–1, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E8–24012 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND 

BUDGET 

Standard Data Elements for Electronic 

Summary Reports of Inventions 

AGENCY: Office of Management and 

Budget, Office of Federal Financial 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice of standard data 

elements. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) is establishing a 

standard set of data elements for a 

government-wide summary report of 

inventions and the Interagency Edison 

extramural invention reporting system 

(iEdison) as the host site for collecting 

this information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marguerite Pridgen, Office of Federal 

Financial Management, Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503; 

telephone 202–395–7844; fax 202–395– 

3952; e-mail mpridgen@omb.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On October 30, 2002, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

proposed the establishment of a 

government-wide standard set of data 

elements for the summary report of 

inventions [67 FR 66178–66183]. The 

proposal included implementation of a 

standard dataset via a single interactive 

Internet web form. The OMB notice 

proposed locating this interactive web 

form on the Interagency Edison 

extramural invention reporting system 

(iEdison) because iEdison facilitates 

compliance with the Bayh-Dole Act 

(Pub. L. 96–517 (codified at 35 U.S.C. 

200 et seq.) Dec. 12, 1980) (‘‘Bayh-Dole 

Act’’) and its implementing regulations 

and iEdison is recognized by federal 

funding recipients as being used by 

most Federal agencies for invention 

reporting and tracking. In response to 

the Federal Register notice, OMB 

received six sets of comments from eight 

entities: three universities; a group of 

universities that participate with 

Federal agencies in a demonstration 

program on research administration; one 

association of research universities; and 

three Federal agencies. The vast 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES