alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02337-REB-MJW

TYRON DUANTE SMALL,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

JOHN DOE DETECTIVE ONE, and

JOHN DOE OFFICER TWO,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s “Requesting the Ammended [sic]

complaint packet, and an [sic] week of extention [sic] from the date receiveing [sic]

request” (Docket No. 38) and “Notice Court Clerk Added Party to Complaint” (Docket

No. 40) are granted to the extent that the Clerk of Court shall send a Prisoner Complaint

Packet to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff shall have up to and including May 25, 2012, to

file his proposed Third Amended Complaint.

Date: May 10, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02337-REB-MJW Document 42 Filed 05/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-CR-00402-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. SHANE FRENCH,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

The Defendant failed to report to Arapahoe House Adult Intensive Residential Treatment

Services Program on March 2, 2012, and at the request of the Probation Department;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status conference be scheduled for March 7, 2012 at

7:30 a.m. before the Magistrate Judge in Durango, Colorado regarding this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure of the Defendant to appear on that date and time

will result in the issuance of a warrant for his arrest.

DATED: March 5, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00402-DW Document 41 Filed 03/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                          --------------------------


Avery-HBS, Inc., a Texas corporation

Hold Billing Services Company, a Texas corporation

Avery Communications, Inc., a Texas corporation

Primal Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Wireless Billing Systems (doing business as Primal Billing Systems), a
 California corporation

Thurston Communications Corporation, a Delaware corporation

TCOM, Inc., a Delaware corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (492)
<INVENTORY>                                    120,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,511
<PP&E>                                          16,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,476)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,639
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,414
<SALES>                                        267,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               267,505
<CGS>                                          226,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,450
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,450
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
```

                                                               EXHIBIT 10(y)(iv)

                       DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

Each non-employee director of the Company receives an annual retainer of $10,000
plus a fee of $1,000 plus expenses for each meeting, excluding teleconference
meetings, of the Board of Directors and, if a member of a Committee, each
Committee meeting not held on the same day that a meeting of the Board of
Directors or another Committee of the Board is held, that he attends. In
addition, provided he is serving as a director of the Company on June 30th of
the applicable year, each non-employee director is granted options under the
Company's stock option plans to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price equal to the closing sale price of the Company's Common Stock on
the American Stock Exchange on such June 30th. The term of each option is ten
years from the date of grant. The options vest in four equal installments over
the first four years of their term.
```
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1732 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. 

Carson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. KARL E. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort 

6 Collins, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1732 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Karl E. Carson 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JENNIFER ADKINS THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-94-66-4, CA-98-114-4) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jennifer Adkins Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas , Nos. CR-94-66-4; CA-98-114-4 (W.D.N.C. June 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         180,543
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,862,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     83,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,217,538
<PP&E>                                       2,763,704
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,957,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,593,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          391,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,813,248
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,593,534
<SALES>                                         83,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,106,831
<CGS>                                          705,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                206,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       550
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   205,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 10.1

                    AMENDMENT THIRTEEN TO MARKETING AGREEMENT

This document is Amendment Thirteen to the Marketing Agreement made and entered
into effective June 1, 1993, and amended by Amendment One to Marketing Agreement
dated September 16, 1993; Amendment Two to Marketing Agreement dated June 4,
1998; Amendment Three to Marketing Agreement dated September 25, 1998; Amendment
Four to Marketing Agreement dated October 19, 1998; and Amendment Five to
Marketing Agreement dated December 15, 1998; Amendment Six to Marketing
Agreement dated March 25, 1999, Amendment Seven to Marketing Agreement dated May
10, 1999, Amendment Eight to Marketing Agreement dated June 24, 1999, Amendment
Nine to Marketing Agreement dated August 5, 1999, Amendment Ten to Marketing
Agreement dated October 1, 1999, Amendment Eleven to Marketing Agreement dated
January 31, 2000, and Amendment Twelve to Marketing Agreement dated February 29,
2000 (the "Agreement"), by and between American National Insurance Company
("American National") a Texas corporation, and Legacy Marketing Group ("LMG"), a
California corporation.

In consideration of mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:

1.     Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and the
       following new Section 3.1 shall be substituted therefore:

       "3.1 Subject to termination as hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall
       remain in force and effect until the close of business on July 31, 2000,
       the term of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed by mutual
       agreement for successive terms of one (1) year unless terminated by
       either party by prior written notice to the other at least one hundred
       eighty (180) days prior to the end of the initial term or the renewal
       term."

2.     Except as specifically amended hereby, all terms and provisions of the
       Marketing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


       <TABLE>
       <CAPTION>
       LEGACY MARKETING GROUP                            AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE
                                                         COMPANY
       <S>                                         <C>

       By:         /s/ David A. Skup               By:         /s/ David A. Behrens
                   -----------------                           --------------------

       Title:      Chief Financial Officer         Title:      Executive V. P. of Independent Marketing
                   -----------------------                     ----------------------------------------

       Witness:    /s/ Stephanie Molteni           Witness:    /s/Lori Herrera
                   ---------------------                       ---------------

       Date:       April 19, 2000                  Date:       April 27, 2000
                   --------------                              --------------
       </TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2019

No. 04-18-00515-CV

SOUTHCROSS ENERGY PARTNERS GP, LLC.,

Appellant

v.

Ivy GONZALEZ on Behalf of M.R. Gonzalez, M.N. Gonzalez, Minor Children, and the Estate 

of Jesus Gonzalez, Jr.; Amy and Jesus Gonzalez, Sr.; and Rene Elizondo,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-16-139

Honorable Sandra L. Watts, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A notice of bankruptcy has been filed, showing a party to this appeal is in bankruptcy. 

The notice also states the court in which the bankruptcy proceeding is pending, the bankruptcy 

proceeding’s style and case number, and the date when the bankruptcy petition was filed.

The court takes no action on the filing. We order the appeal abated and removed from 

the court’s active docket. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2; 4th Tex. App. (San Antonio) Loc. R. 4. All 

motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being re-urged in the event 

the case is reinstated. The appeal will be reinstated only upon proper motion and proof. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 8.3(a).

We further order the clerk of this court to send copies of this order to the trial court clerk, 

the court reporter, and the attorneys of record.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-3027EA

_____________ Danny Corbishley, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: February 12, 1999

Filed: February 19, 1999

_____________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, and FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Danny Corbishley appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Corbishley disability insurance benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an extended opinion would serve no useful purpose in this fact-intensive case. We find substantial evidence supports the decisionof the Commissioner, and Corbishley is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
Certified Public Accountant
                                       330 Warm Springs Road
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                702.257.1984
                                          702.362.0540 (fax)



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I  have  issued my report dated April 3, 2002,  accompanying
the  financial statements of Quality Exchange, Inc. on  Form
10-KSB  for  the year ended December 31, 2001  and  for  the
period of June 3, 1998 (inception date) through December 31,
2001.  I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said  report on the Annual Report of Quality Exchange,  Inc.
on Form 10-KSB.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
------------------------------
March 24, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS

SHERRY L. DERAY, as heir and next of kin of John R. Winkler (deceased),

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO;

RICHARD MYERS;

RONALD SHEPPARD;

CARLOS SANDOVAL; and

JOHN HAVENAR,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 20th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
June 30, 2006

Graham Capital Management, L.P. Rock Ledge Financial Center 40 Highland Avenue Rowayton, CT 06853

Attention: Mr. Paul Sedlack

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Sedlack:

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2007 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

|  |              |                                          |
|--|--------------|------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney Global Markets Futures Fund |

|  |              |                                               |
|--|--------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II |

|  |              |                                            |
|--|--------------|--------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                                                         |
|--|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Salomon Smith Barney Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |             |
|--|--------------|-------------|
|  | •  | AURORA 2001 |

|  |              |            |
|--|--------------|------------|
|  | •  | AURORA III |

|  |              |                                                  |
|--|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                                         |
|--|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. |

|  |              |                                          |
|--|--------------|------------------------------------------|
|  | •  | Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II |

|  |              |                         |
|--|--------------|-------------------------|
|  | •  | Citibank NA (Alera 100) |

|  |              |                     |
|--|--------------|---------------------|
|  | •  | Alera Portfolio SPC |

|  |              |                             |
|--|--------------|-----------------------------|
|  | •  | CMF Graham Master Fund L.P. |

Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By: /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.        Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.        Chief Financial Officer & Director

By: /s/ Paul Sedlack

Print Name: Paul Sedlack

DRMcA/sr

----
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech)on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Duffy,Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ John E.  Duffy       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| John E.  Duffy           |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| August 15,  2002         |

 

----
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 5, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-0903 Lower Tribunal No. F20-14617

________________ 

### Seymour Quiles , Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee.
An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge. Seymour Quiles, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.