alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02624-REB-MEH

SHAWN HUDSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAN MARKS, in his individual capacity,

STEVE BISCARO, in his individual capacity,

BRIAN HARRELL, in his individual capacity, and

THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#21]1

filed May 31, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the

stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#21] filed May 31, 2012,

is APPROVED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for November 2, 2012, is

VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence November 19, 2012, is VACATED;

1 “[#21]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

Case 1:11-cv-02624-REB-MEH Document 22 Filed 05/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and

5. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay

their own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated May 31, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

2

Case 1:11-cv-02624-REB-MEH Document 22 Filed 05/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Order entered May 15, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01505
- CV
DALLAS NATIONAL INSU RANCE COMPANY, Appellant
V. CALITEX CORP., ELSHI R ENTERPRISES, L.P. AND THOMAS, L.P., Appellee s On Appeal from the 193rd J udicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 14157 

### O RDER By notice filed May 5, 2014, appellant inform s us that it has been deemed an impaired insurer and placed into rehabilitation by Order of the Court of Chancery of the Stat e of Delaware. Attached to the notice is a “Rehabilitation and Injunction Order” entered by the Chancery Court. Accordingly, p ursuant to section 462.309 of the Texas Insurance Code, this appeal is automatically STAYED for a period of six months from the date appellant was deemed impaired

– - April 28, 2014. See Tex. Ins. Code Ann. 462.309(a) (West 2009) . It shall be reinstated October 6, 2014. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4.1( a).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  2,903
<SECURITIES>                                            9,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                           6,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                              125
<INVENTORY>                                             4,984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       25,650
<PP&E>                                                  6,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         49,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   4,911
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               32,956
<OTHER-SE>                                             11,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           49,658
<SALES>                                                16,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       16,516
<CGS>                                                   7,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           7,442
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (6,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              178
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (6,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (6,699)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (1.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (1.35)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02766-RPM 

RICKEY BURRELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, 

BRANDON RINNAN, in his individual capacity, 

DARREN CHAMBERLAND, in his individual capacity, and 

DARRYL HUNTSMAN, in his individual capacity, 

Defendants. 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

UPON the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, the Court, being fully

advised in the premises and for good cause shown, hereby: 

ORDERS the parties’ Motion is GRANTED. The current deadlines, as set forth in the

Scheduling Order [Doc. 8], are extended as follows: 

a. Discovery cut-off: October 3, 2012. 

b. Dispositive Motions Deadline: October 26, 2012. 

c. Plaintiff’s Expert Disclosure: July 25, 2012. 

d. Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: August 22, 2012. 

e. Rebuttal Expert Cut-off: September 12, 2012 

DATED this 23rd day of May, 2012. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________ 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch 

Case 1:11-cv-02766-RPM Document 19 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                              71
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3912
<ALLOWANCES>                                       774
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1770
<PP&E>                                            6760
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1640
<BONDS>                                           4843
<COMMON>                                          2515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6290
<SALES>                                           2002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2168
<CGS>                                              571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    91
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    200
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     36
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-02751-BNB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-BNB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-BNB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-BNB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-209738 and 333-209738-01 of First National Master Note Trustand First National Funding LLC on Form SF-3 of our report dated March 28, 2018, relating to the Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for Fist National Bank of Omaha appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of First National Master Note Trust and First National Funding LLC for the year ended December 31, 2017. 

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP 

Omaha, Nebraska 

March 28, 2018
#### Co-operative Transit Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 25030

Decided March 6, 1935.)

*Mr. Gordon D. Kinder,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. Donald G. Power,*for defendant in error.

The Public Utilities Commission granted the Eastern Ohio Transport Company an interstate certificate to operate a motor transportation line between Shady-side, Ohio, and Wheeling, West Virginia, via Bellaire and Bridgeport, Ohio.

Subsequently the commission granted an extension of the interstate certificate to operate from Bridgeport to G-lens Run, from which order the Wheeling Traction Company prosecuted error proceedings to this court, which affirmed the order of the Public Utilities Commission. *(Wheeling Traction Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*124 Ohio St., 393.)

Thereafter the Co-operative Transit Company, successor to the Wheeling Traction Company, filed a complaint, praying that the order granting the extension be revoked, for the reason that the extension had not been operated by the Eastern Ohio Transport *244Company. Thereafter the Co-operative Transit Company filed a bill of complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, praying that the Eastern Ohio Transport Company be restrained from operating over the extension.

The Public Utilities Commission dismissed the complaint, filed before it by the Co-operative Transit Company, upon the ground that failure to establish and maintain service over the extension was due entirely to negotiations which were being carried on between the complainant and the defendant looking to an agreed division of the business which said parties maintain in competition with each other through this territory.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the Public Utilities Commission be, and the same hereby is, affirmed for the reason that the order of that commission is not unlawful nor unreasonable, and the commission did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint. *(Miami Valley Transit Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*117 Ohio St., 311; *Columbus Motor Express, Inc.,*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*126 Ohio St., 11; and *Cannonball Transportation Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*124 Ohio St., 474.)

*Order affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., conur.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.211 Municipal Securities and Loans** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 99(i)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2002-2 (the receivables) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2002-2 has been conducted by Household Retail Services, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented.

 

 

/s/ Joe Hoff
/s/ Chuck Colip
Joe Hoff
Chuck Colip
Chief Financial Officer -
Deputy Managing Director/
Household Retail Services
Chief Operating Officer- 
Household Retail Services    
February 28, 2004
February 28, 2004
Date
Date
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1877 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1877


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that members of the 
Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military salute 
             during hoisting, lowering, or passing of flag.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONDUCT BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS OUT OF 
              UNIFORM DURING HOISTING, LOWERING, OR PASSING OF FLAG.

    Section 9 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``all persons present'' and all that follows through the end and 
inserting ``those present in uniform should render the military salute. 
Members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in 
uniform may render the military salute. All other persons present 
should face the flag and stand at attention with their right hand over 
the heart, or if applicable, remove their headdress with their right 
hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. 
Citizens of other countries should stand at attention. All such conduct 
toward the flag in a moving column should be rendered at the moment the 
flag passes.''.

            Passed the Senate July 25, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.











/s/ David A. Christensen


David A. Christensen


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


April 27, 2010
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer ofHickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of HickoryTech.
| /s/ David A. Christensen                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David A. Christensen                              |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May 3, 2007                                       |

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1352 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

S 1352 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 127 East Locust Street in 

5 Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate May 23, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request;

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549-0213

Extension:
    Rule 425; OMB Control No. 3235-0521; SEC File No. 270-462.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget the request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 425 (17 CFR 230.425) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) requires the filing of certain prospectuses and 
communications under Rule 135 (17 CFR 230.135) and Rule 165 (17 CFR 
230.165) in connection with business combination transactions. The 
purpose of the rule is to permit more oral and written communications 
with shareholders about tender offers, mergers and other business 
combination transactions on a more timely basis, so long as the written 
communications are filed on the date of first use. The information 
provided under Rule 425 is made available to the public upon request. 
Also, the information provided under Rule 425 is mandatory. 
Approximately 3,700 issuers file communications under Rule 425 at an 
estimated .25 hours per response for a total of 925 annual burden 
hours.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed 
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12537e776a737c7677604d463c4d5a677c66527d7f703c777d623c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc9db0b9a4bdb2b8b9ae8388f28394a9b2a89cb3b1bef2b9b3acf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information 
Officer, Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, 
VA 22312; or send e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#247476657b69454d48464b5c645741470a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f2f2d3e20321e16131d10073f0c1a1c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be 
submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: February 4, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-2444 Filed 2-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>