alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           6,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,058)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,175
<PP&E>                                         110,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                (68,540)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,308
<SALES>                                        228,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,243
<CGS>                                          163,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,882)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,639)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,243)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)
        

</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 171 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Mickey Mantle 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Mickey Mantle Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MICKEY MANTLE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 301 Commerce Street in Com6 merce, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Mickey Mantle Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 171 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mickey Mantle Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1703 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1703

             To prevent and reduce trafficking in persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2007

Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To prevent and reduce trafficking in persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trafficking in Persons 
Accountability Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION IN CERTAIN TRAFFICKING OFFENSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1596. Jurisdiction in certain trafficking offenses
    ``The jurisdiction of the courts of the United States over any 
offense under this chapter shall include any case in which, not later 
than 10 years after the conduct required for the offense occurs, the 
alleged offender is brought into, or found in, the United States, even 
if that conduct occurred outside the United States.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections at 
the beginning of chapter 77 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``1596. Jurisdiction in certain trafficking offenses.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02577-PAB-MJW

MARIBEL RODRIQUEZ,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

EDUCATION SALES AND MARKETING, LLC,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective

Order (docket no. 18) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The written Stipulated

Protective Order (docket no. 19) is APPROVED as amended in paragraphs 3 and 11

and made an Order of Court. 

Date: January 19, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02577-PAB-MJW Document 21 Filed 01/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000766041
<NAME> CENTRAL SPRINKLER CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997             OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997             APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,792                   2,792
<SECURITIES>                                    14,074                  14,074
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,051                  49,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,223                   5,223
<INVENTORY>                                     49,513                  49,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,409                 118,409
<PP&E>                                          67,884                  67,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,819                  21,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,725                 168,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,233                  78,233
<BONDS>                                         30,009                  30,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            56                      56
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,123                  58,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,725                 168,725
<SALES>                                         53,873                 102,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,873                 102,053
<CGS>                                           36,721                  69,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,721                  69,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,637                  24,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,076                   2,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,439                   5,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,281                   2,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,158                   3,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,158                   3,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64                    1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64                    1.03
        

</TABLE>
ex10-46.htm


EXHIBIT 10.46


 



PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 




 



	$52,650.00 	April 30, 2014





 


For value received, Guardian 8 Holdings, a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”) promised to pay to Corey Lambrecht, or its registered assigns or successors in interest (the “Holder”) the Principal Amount and Interest (both as defined below) in the manner and upon the terms and conditions as set forth in that Term Note (“Note”) in the sum of Fifty Two Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Dollars ($52,650.00), dated September 1, 2013, which Note becomes due and payable on or about April 30, 2014.







By execution by the parties herein, this Promissory Note Extension Agreement extends the Maturity Date of the Note to and including July 15, 2014. All terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same other than the Maturity Date.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have caused this Promissory Note Extension Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.







“Maker”


Guardian 8 Holdings


a Nevada corporation

















By: /s/ C. Stephen Cochennet                                                                          


                                                                       C. Stephen Cochennet, Chief Executive Officer







“Holder”






















/s/ Corey Lambrecht                                                                          


Corey Lambrecht
Wdesk | Exhibit 10.2






Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 1
to the 
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The Indemnification Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated the [•] day of [•], 20[•], by and between MDU Resources Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [•], an individual (the “Indemnitee”) is hereby amended as follows:


WHEREAS, 10 Del. C. Section 3114(b) provides that every nonresident of the State of Delaware who is appointed as an officer of the Company is deemed to have consented to the appointment of the registered agent of the Company for service of process in proceedings brought in Delaware in which such officer is a necessary or proper party or in any action against such officer for violation of a duty in such capacity; and


WHEREAS, the term “officer” as defined by 10 Del. C. Section 3114(b)  means an officer of the Company who (i) is or was the president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief legal officer, controller, treasurer or chief accounting officer of the Company at any time during the course of conduct alleged in the action or proceeding to be wrongful, (ii) is or was identified in the Company’s public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission because such person is or was one of the most highly compensated executive officers of the Company at any time during the course of conduct alleged in the action or proceeding to be wrongful or (iii) has, by written agreement with the Company, consented to be identified as an “officer” for purposes of 10 Del. C. Section 3114(b); and


WHEREAS, the Indemnitee wishes to consent to be identified as an “officer” for purposes of 10 Del. C. Section 3114(b), regardless of whether the Indemnitee would otherwise fall within the definition of “officer” set forth in that section.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants contained herein and in the Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Indemnitee hereby agree that Article 11, Section 11.5 is amended to add paragraph (b) as follows:


(b) The Indemnitee hereby consents to be identified as an “officer” for purposes of 10 Del. C. Section 3114(b), regardless of whether Indemnitee would otherwise fall within the definition of “officer” set forth in that section.

1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1, dated the [•] day of [•], 20[•].
 
	
			
	 
	By: 
	 

	 
	Name: 
	 

	 
	Title:
	 

	 
	 
	 




 
	
			
	 
	 
	MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By: 
	 

	 
	Name: 
	 

	 
	Title:
	 




 



2
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Fiscal Years
                                                     1998             1997             1996
                                                     ----             ----             ----
<S>                                               <C>              <C>              <C>
     Weighted average common shares
       outstanding during the year                   5,289            5,344            5,389

     Effect of dilutive stock options, net
       of shares assumed repurchased at
       average market price                           --               --                 10
                                                  --------         --------         --------

     Weighted average common shares and
       common share equivalents                      5,289            5,344            5,399
                                                  ========         ========         ========

     Net Income (Loss)                            $(48,650)        $   (860)        $  3,704
                                                  ========         ========         ========

     Basic earnings (loss) per share              $  (9.20)        $   (.16)        $    .69
     Diluted earnings (loss) per share               (9.20)            (.16)             .69
</TABLE>

                                       68
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of United eSystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Walter Reid
Green, Jr., as Principal Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Walter Reid Green,
      Jr.Walter
      Reid Green, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:  March 12,
      2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 21-2125

___________________________

 

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Dale Roberson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln1

____________

Submitted: November 4, 2021

Filed: November 18, 2021

[Unpublished] 

____________

 

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

Dale Roberson received a 180-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty 

to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 

1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 

of Nebraska.
-2- 

841(b)(1)(A), 846. As part of the plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his

conviction and sentence, except for, as relevant here, ineffective assistance of 

counsel. In an Anders brief, Roberson’s counsel suggests that the sentence is 

substantively unreasonable. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A pro 

se supplemental brief alleges that counsel was ineffective. 

The appeal waiver, which is enforceable, covers the sentencing issue. See

United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of 

an appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 

2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls 

within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into 

the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a 

miscarriage of justice). And we decline to consider the ineffective-assistance-ofcounsel claim on direct appeal. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 

824, 826–27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually best 

litigated in collateral proceedings”).

Finally, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that no 

other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, grant counsel permission to withdraw, and deny 

the pending pro se motion as moot.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24622]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 
Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears 
in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the 
Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or contacting the Office of 
Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96e2e4f7f2f3f7f8f7faefe5ffe5d6f0fbf5b8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b3f392a2f2e2a252a27323822380b2d2628652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011426-042.
    Title: West Coast of South America Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: APL Co. Pte Ltd.; Compania Chilena de Navigacion 
Interoceanica, S.A.; Compania Sud Americana de Vapores, S.A.; Frontier 
Liner Services, Inc.; Hamburg-S[uuml]d; King Ocean Services Limited, 
Inc.; Maruba S.C.A.; Seaboard Marine Ltd.; South Pacific Shipping 
Company, Ltd.; and Trinity Shipping Line.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment removes Mediterranean Shipping Company SA 
as a party to the agreement.

    Dated: October 10, 2008.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-24622 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 129559 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### DONALD C. AUSTIN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 129559 COA: 259481 Wayne CC: 04-414591-CZ MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50838

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

IVAN ONTIVEROS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:17-CR-81-1

Before DAVIS, COSTA, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ivan Ontiveros has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Ontiveros has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 27, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50838 Document: 00514530914 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/27/2018
No. 17-50838

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-50838 Document: 00514530914 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/27/2018