alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Canaan Energy Corporation:

We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.

                                              KPMG LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
May 26, 2000
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Indian Oil Company:

We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.

                                              KPMG LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
May 26, 2000
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  January      28, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser              |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                                   |   | Ronald      C. Schmeiser             |
|                                   |   | Principal      Executive Officer and |
|                                   |   | Principal      Financial Officer     |

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00082-CR

Darren Latodd Houston, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

NO. 2020R-154, THE HONORABLE JAMES H. SHOEMAKE, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant Darren Latodd Houston is currently represented on appeal by appointed 

counsel. On October 3, 2023, counsel attempted to file a “Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Brief,” in which he requested that we order him withdrawn and allow appellant to represent 

himself.1 On November 17, 2023, the Court received a letter from appellant confirming that he 

wishes to proceed pro se and asking that we order counsel to file a motion to withdraw.

We therefore abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to conduct a 

hearing and determine whether: (1) appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) appellant 

wishes to discharge his appointed attorney and proceed with his appeal pro se; (3) the waiver of 

1 We rejected the filing because it was not in compliance with Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 6.5. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5. As of the date of this order, counsel has not filed a 

corrected motion.
2

assistance of counsel is made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently; (4) appellant’s decision 

to proceed pro se is in the best interest of appellant and of the State; and (5) appellant is fully 

aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.6 

(permitting courts of appeals to make “any other appropriate order that the law and the nature of 

the case require”); Williams v. State, 252 S.W.3d 353, 356 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Funderburg 

v. State, 717 S.W.2d 637, 641–42 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Thompson v. State, 525 S.W.3d 744, 

744 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, pet. ref’d) (order) (per curiam). If the trial court 

determines that appellant has made a voluntary, knowing, and intelligent decision to waive his

right to counsel on appeal and to represent himself, it shall revoke its order appointing appellate 

counsel for appellant.

The court is also ordered to prepare a supplemental reporter’s record of the 

hearing as well as a supplemental clerk’s record including all appropriate orders, findings of 

facts, and conclusions of law. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2), .6(d). The records shall be filed 

with this Court no later than January 12, 2024.

It is ordered on December 1, 2023.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: December 1, 2023

Do Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61186-61187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6400]


Fine Arts Committee Notice of Meeting

    The Fine Arts Committee of the Department of State will meet on 
November 13, 2008 at 11 a.m. in the Henry Clay Room of the Harry S. 
Truman Building, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will 
last until approximately 12 p.m. and is open to the public.
    The agenda for the committee meeting will include a summary of the 
work of the Fine Arts Office since its last meeting on April 25, 2008 
and the announcement of gifts and loans of furnishings as well as 
financial contributions from January 1, 2008 through September 30, 
2008.
    Public access to the Department of State is strictly controlled and 
space is limited. Members of the public wishing to take part in the 
meeting should telephone the Fine Arts Office at (202) 647-1990 or send 
an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d5f686f7978734b565d4e697c6978337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82c0f7f0e6e7ecd4c9c2d1f6e3f6e7ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a> by November 6 to make arrangements to 
enter the building. The public may take part in

[[Page 61187]]

the discussion as long as time permits and at the discretion of the 
chairman.

    Dated: October 7, 2008.
Marcee Craighill,
Secretary, Fine Arts Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-24516 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61435-61436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14874-K; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 61436]]

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional 
Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Katyaak Corporation. The 
lands are in the vicinity of Kiana, Alaska, and are located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 20 N., R. 7 W.,
    Secs. 25, 26 and 27;
    Secs. 34, 35 and 36.
    Containing approximately 3,834 acres.
T. 17 N., R. 8 W.,
    Secs. 7, 8, and 9;
    Secs. 16 and 17.
    Containing approximately 3,190 acres.
    Aggregating approximately 7,024 acres.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to NANA 
Regional Corporation, Inc. when the surface estate is conveyed to NANA 
Regional Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Katyaak 
Corporation. Notice of the decision will also be published four times 
in the Arctic Sounder.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until November 17, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d2c26632f2120632e22233b28342c232e280d2c26632f2120632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f39298dd919f9edd909c9d85968a929d9096b39298dd919f9edd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Hillary Woods,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8-24634 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1549

CARL E. MCADOO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Department of Veterans Affairs) in Official 

and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; DR. ERNEST T. AHL, JR., in 

Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; DR. SONNY W. 

TUCKER, JR., in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; 

SANDY F. PIERCE, Physician Assistant, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued 

Jointly and Severally; RUTHERFORD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL 

SERVICES, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; JOHN 

CARROLL, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; VIC 

MARTIN, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; ANN 

PADGETT, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally; JOYCE 

ANN NASH, in Official and Personal Capacity, sued Jointly and Severally,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH)

Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Carl E. McAdoo, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, 

Asheville, North Carolina; Sean Francis Perrin, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & 

RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; John E. Rogers, II, WARD LAW FIRM, PA, 

Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Carl E. McAdoo appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ 

motions to dismiss his complaint alleging various civil rights violations related to the 

death and estate of his father. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McAdoo v. United 

States, No. 1:14-cv-00239-MOC-DLH (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2015; Apr. 4, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.4

                        CIT HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2002-1
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT

The undersigned certifies that he is an Executive Vice President of The CIT
Group/Consumer Finance, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware
("CITCF"), and that as such he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
certificate on behalf of CITCF in connection with Section 6.06(a) of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 28, 2002 among CITCF, as Seller and
Master Servicer, Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Acceptance Corp., as
Depositor, CFHE Funding Company LLC, as Conduit Seller, and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
as Trustee for CIT Home Equity Loan Trust 2002-1 (the "Agreement"). All
capitalized terms used herein without definition having the respective meanings
specified in the Agreement. The undersigned further certifies to the Trustee and
Underwriters that a review of the activities of CITCF during the 2002 calendar
year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under his
supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such review, CITCF has
fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement during the 2002 calendar year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature this 10th day of February
2003.

                                       THE CIT GROUP/CONSUMER
                                       FINANCE, INC., as
                                       Master Servicer

                                       __________________________________
                                       Name:  William L. Schumm
                                       Title: Executive Vice President
#### UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. William E. CARTER, Respondent.

No. B-2851.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1971.

*3Johnson & Guthrie, Robert Lee Guthrie, Dallas, for petitioners.

William F. Billings, Dallas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the court of civil appeals in this case contains the following language: “Since appellee obviously proceeded on the theory that the stipulation of total value of the loss was effective, we think that in the interest of justice the entire judgment should be reversed and remanded for another trial.” United States Fire Insurance Company v. Carter, 468 S.W.2d 151, at 155 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1971).

An appellate court may only reverse for error committed on trial. It may not reverse “in the interest of justice.” Having reversed because of error committed on trial, a court of civil appeals or the Supreme Court may, because the case has not been fully developed, or in the interest of justice, or for like reason, remand for a new trial rather than render the judgment which should have been rendered by the court below. *See*Rules 434 and 505, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. These rules do not authorize an appellate court to reverse “in the interest of justice.”

In this case the record reflects that error was committed on trial which requires a reversal of the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the judgment of the court of civil appeals reversing the judgment of the trial court was proper. Under Rule 434, its judgment remanding the cause rather than rendering judgment for the appellant was authorized. Accordingly, both applications for writ of error are refused, no reversible error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       825
<INVENTORY>                                     23,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,531
<PP&E>                                         288,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,749
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (26,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,982
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               712,415
<CGS>                                          582,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  664,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,122)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**
EXHIBIT 31.1 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14/15d-14(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

I, Timothy D. Hart, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First National Master Note Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliancereviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by U.S. Bank National Association. 
**

Dated: March 27, 2019   /s/ Timothy D. Hart   Timothy D. Hart, Senior Vice President, First National Bank of Omaha (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
 
[Signature page toCertification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15d-14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]
#### J. C. FRANKLIN v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### PETERS v. FLORIDA HOTEL & RESTAURANT COMMISSION.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 4.6

 

GRANTOR INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENT JOINDER

 

April 4, 2014

 

The undersigned, Archway Sales, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereby agrees to become party as a Grantor under the ABL Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2011, among Bank of America, N.A., as ABL Agent for the ABL Secured Parties referred to therein; Bank of America, N.A., as Term Loan Agent for the Term Loan Secured Parties referred to therein; Nexeo Solutions, LLC, Nexeo Solutions Holdings, LLC and Nexeo Solutions Sub Holding Corp. (the “ABL Intercreditor Agreement”) for all purposes thereof on the terms set forth therein, and to be bound by the terms of the ABL Intercreditor Agreement as fully as if the undersigned had executed and delivered the ABL Intercreditor Agreement as of the date thereof.  All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the ABL Intercreditor Agreement

 

The provisions of Article 7 of the ABL Intercreditor Agreement will apply with like effect to this Grantor Intercreditor Agreement Joinder.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has caused this Grantor Intercreditor Agreement Joinder to be executed by its officer or representative as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
    	
ARCHWAY SALES, LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Michael B. Farnell, Jr.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Michael B. Farnell, Jr.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal   Officer and Secretary
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Notice Address:
    
	
 
    	
3 Waterway Square Place, Suite 1000
    
	
 
    	
The Woodlands, TX 77380
    


 

[Signature Page to ABL Intercreditor Joinder]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  March 31, 2008
    /s/ Brian J. RoneyBrian J. Roney, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTER
OF FISCAL 1996 10Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          27,803
<SECURITIES>                                    24,698
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,139
<INVENTORY>                                      9,305
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,131
<PP&E>                                          35,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,849
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,859)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,277
<SALES>                                         38,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,259
<CGS>                                           23,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                       623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>