alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00422-REB-03

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

3. NATHAN TOAN MANH DO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed in this matter. On June 27, 2012, commencing

at 10:0 a.m., the court shall conduct a telephonic setting conference to set this matter for

a change of plea hearing. Counsel for the government shall arrange, initiate, and

coordinate the conference call necessary to facilitate the setting conference.

Dated: June 11, 2012

Case 1:11-cr-00422-REB Document 140 Filed 06/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02628-BNB

WORDEN BOURN,

CHARLES GREENLEE, and

All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

GEO GROUP INC.,

HUDSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,

WARDEN JOE DRIVER,

ASSOCIATE WARDEN RON MURRAY,

STATE OF ALASKA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SAM EDWARDS, and

Others to be Named,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

This matter is before the Court on the “Request to Compel Alaska Dept. Of

Corrections to Provide the Check From Forced Savings for Filing Fee” (Doc. No. 40),

filed on January 30, 2012, by Plaintiff Worden Bourn. The request is DENIED.

As of the date of this minute order, the Court is not in receipt of any payment

from either Plaintiff on the filing fee due in this action. The Court will allow Mr. Bourn

fourteen (14) days from the date of this minute order in which to either (1) submit his 

initial partial filing fee to the Court or (2) provide the Court with documentation showing

that the Alaska Department of Corrections has denied his request to forward money to

the Court. The documentation needs to be certified by an appropriate official at Mr.

Bourn’s penal institution. 

Dated: January 31, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02628-LTB Document 43 Filed 01/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3





April 28, 2000


Philippe P. Dauman
Deputy Chairman
Viacom Inc.
1515 Broadway
New York, New York  10036



Dear Philippe:

                  This letter is intended to confirm certain of our
understandings relating to the Agreement between you and Viacom Inc. (the
"Company"), dated as of September 6, 1999 (the "Agreement").

                  You have agreed to resign your employment as an employee of
the Company and any of the Company's direct or indirect subsidiaries and your
position as an officer of the Company as Deputy Chairman and Executive Vice
President. You further have agreed to resign as an officer and member of the
boards of directors of the Company's direct and indirect subsidiaries (except as
noted in the following sentence). It is our mutual intention that you shall
continue as a member of the boards of directors of the Company, Blockbuster Inc.
and The MTVi Group, Inc. for the remainder of your current term. All
resignations shall be effective as of the day immediately prior to the Effective
Time of the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan
of Merger between CBS Corporation and the Company, dated as of September 6,
1999. The Company acknowledges that such resignation is at the request, and for
the benefit, of the Company, shall be deemed to constitute termination of your
employment for "Good Reason" (and for this purpose the Company waives any
written notice from you or any period within which to cure) and the Resignation
Date for purposes of the Agreement shall be deemed to include the date of such
resignation thereby qualifying you for all the payments and benefits attendant
to a resignation for Good Reason or a resignation on the Resignation Date, under
the Agreement, and the Restricted Period for purposes of Section 4.1 of the
Agreement shall commence on such Resignation Date.
<PAGE>

                  Please acknowledge your assent to the foregoing by executing
the attached copy of this letter agreement where indicated and returning it to
the Company.

                                                  Very truly yours,

                                                  /s/ Michael D. Fricklas


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:



   /s/ Philippe P. Dauman
-----------------------------
   Philippe P. Dauman
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB

DALIP BASANTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,

JASON ROZESKI, M.D.,

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER,

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through

SALUD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER, 

ANDREW MAY M.D.,

N. WELTER, F.N.P.,

GUILLERMINA CASTILLO, P.A.,

ALBERTO DENEGRI, M.D.,

KELET ROBINSON, M.D.,

EIILEEN FLAHERTY, N.P.,

LORRAINE RUFNER, M.D., and

MELISSA BEAGLE, M.D.

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF

PARTIES

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for

Dismissal of Parties filed August 1, 2012 (ECF No. 78).

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Dalip Basanti, by and through

her attorneys, seek the dismissal of Defendants Andre May, M.D., Nancy Welter,

F.N.P., Guillermina Castillo, P.A., Alberto Denegri, M.D., Kelet Robinson, M.D., Eileen

Flaherty, N.P., Lorraine Rufner, M.D., and Melissa Beagle, M.D. The Court having

reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 79 Filed 08/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. The claims against Defendants Andre May,

M.D., Nancy Welter, F.N.P., Guillermina Castillo, P.A., Alberto Denegri, M.D., Kelet

Robinson, M.D., Eileen Flaherty, N.P., Lorraine Rufner, M.D., and Melissa Beagle, M.D.

are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All parties shall bear their own

attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated this 2nd day of August, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

 

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 79 Filed 08/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company,

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company, 

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company,

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a New

Jersey insurance company,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the Travelers Defendants’ Motion to Amend Scheduling Order

Re: Expert Designation Limitation [Doc. # 137, filed 2/28/2013] (the “Motion”), which is

GRANTED.

The Travelers Defendants request a modification of the Scheduling Order to increase the

number of specially retained experts per separately represented party from five to six. As

grounds, the Travelers Defendants assert that their amended counterclaims introduced a new

issue into the case not contemplated at the time of the scheduling conference. Okland opposes

the Motion, arguing that the expert testimony the Travelers Defendants seek to add “is unrelated

to the claims and defenses Travelers has raised in this litigation.” Response [Doc. # 143] at ¶1. 

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 144 Filed 03/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

The report of the expert at issue is not before me and, in its absence, I cannot determine

whether the proposed opinions are relevant or not. Nor is this the appropriate time for that

determination. I am asked here only to increase the number of experts allowed. The issues of

relevance and admissibility must await pretrial motions in limine or contemporaneous objections

at trial.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 137] is GRANTED; and

(2) The Scheduling Order is modified to provide that each separately represented

party may designate no more than six specially retained expert witnesses.

Dated March 8, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 144 Filed 03/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case 1:11-cr-00425-MJW Document 24 Filed 12/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1996             FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995             NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                          440336                  440336
<SECURITIES>                                    317678                  317678
<RECEIVABLES>                                   485855                  485855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      50969                   50969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1418164                 1418164
<PP&E>                                         3021067                 3021067
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1713314)               (1713314)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3282063                 3282063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           402008                  402008
<BONDS>                                          72222                   72222
<COMMON>                                        197318                  197318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2528565                 2528565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3282063                 3282063
<SALES>                                         515461                 1450343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                515461                 1450343
<CGS>                                           389799                 1155298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   503347                 1493675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 69480                  335775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 665                    3268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (58031)                (382375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (26650)                (122041)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31381)                (260334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31381)                (260334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)                   (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)                   (.26)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-90] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-90 with attached transmittal, and policy justification. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 61796)          ( print page 61797)          ( print page 61798)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M 

[FR Doc. E8-24452 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am] 

                BILLING CODE 5001-06-C                       ( print page 61799)
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24087]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3294-EM]

Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Texas (FEMA-3294-EM), dated September 10, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective September 26, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-24087 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1799

CURLEE SHERMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FERSE 5-10, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge; Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-1799-5) Submitted: October 29, 2004 Decided: November 15, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to a previously entered pre-filing review order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman v. Ferse 5-10 , No. CA-04-1799-5 (D.S.C. filed July 16, 2004; entered July 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23



Child, Sullivan & Company

A Professional Corporation of CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

1284   W.  Flint   Meadow   Dr., Suite D, Kaysville, UT 84037                                 PHONE: (801) 927-1337  FAX: (801) 927-1344









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 10-KSB (File No. 333-86830) of our report dated March 26, 2004 on our audits of the financial statements of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc., as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.





Child, Sullivan & Company



Child, Sullivan & Company

Kaysville, Utah

March 30, 2004
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-13408

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

NORMA MARTIN, 

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus

E.C. PUBLICATIONS INC., 

WARNER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 

d.b.a. DC Comics

Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees,

DC COMICS, Inc.,

USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13408

Defendant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-21167-DPG

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We issued a jurisdictional question asking whether the district court has entered a final, appealable order, and, particularly, 

whether Appellees’ counterclaims have been resolved. In response, Appellees request that we remand this appeal to the district 

court for a ruling on their pending motion to dismiss the counterclaims. Appellant Norma Martin opposes the motion. We conclude that the district court has not entered a final or appealable 

order, so this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and Appellees’ motion to remand is DENIED as MOOT.

Martin appeals the district court’s September 27, 2022 order 

entering summary judgment to Appellees on all of her claims. 

However, the district court’s order did not address Appellees’

counterclaims, and our review of the record does not reveal any 

other order disposing of them. Further, the district court did not 

certify its September 27, 2022 order for immediate review under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Accordingly, the district 

USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 2 of 3
22-13408 Opinion of the Court 3

court’s order is not final or immediately appealable, and we lack 

jurisdiction to review it. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading 

FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012). 

Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we decline to 

entertain Appellees’ motion to remand. See Vachon v. Travelers 

Home & Marine Ins. Co., 20 F.4th 1343, 1347 (11th Cir. 2021) (stating 

that when we lack jurisdiction, “we may do no more than ‘announc[e] the fact and dismiss[] the cause’” (quoting United States v. 

Amodeo, 916 F.3d 967, 971 (11th Cir. 2019))).

USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7014

REXFORD GARLAND CASSIDY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MR. LAWSON, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-37)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rexford Garland Cassidy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's dismissal of his Complaint without prejudice for failure to particularize his claims.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – Sabesp (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 27, 2012  By:/s/ Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso Name:    Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso Title:       Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer




---