alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-WJM-MJW

DALIP BASANTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,

JASON ROZESKI, M.D., and

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER,

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through

SALUD FAMILY HEALTH CENTER

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S 

FOURTH AND FIFTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Platte Valley medical Center’s

Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fifth Claims, filed January 9, 2013

(ECF No. 96). The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby

ORDERS as follows:

The Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Fourth and Fifth Claims for

relief against Defendant Platte Valley Medical Center shall be and are DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay her, his or its own attorney’s fees and costs

with respect to such claims.

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 97 Filed 01/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated this 11th day of January, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

__________________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 97 Filed 01/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendant.

 

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

This criminal action has proceeded to sentencing and a final judgment and conviction, and

the defendant was remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal at sentencing, or has selfsurrendered to the designated facility, as confirmed by the United States Bureau of Prisons. As a

result, all the conditions of an appearance bond imposed by the court as a pretrial matter to secure

the defendant’s release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), have been satisfied. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the bond in this case is hereby exonerated and the surety or sureties, if

applicable, are released. It is further 

ORDERED that the bail funds or property deposited into the registry of the court shall

hereby be released by the clerk of the court, or a designated deputy, to the surety or the defendant. 

Dated this 9th day of December, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

Chief United States District Judge

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 357 filed 12/09/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
Order entered September 12, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00518

- CR

RONNIE DECOURTLAND B ASS, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. F11

- 26843

- N



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial co urt shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desire s to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent , it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay i n filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written
findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to t his Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.
The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be
reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,

whichever is ear lier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jeffrey H. Sakamoto, Vice President – Finance and Administration of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1)     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or  78o (d)); and       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2)     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Date:  |    February  13, 2004 |   | /s/  Jeffrey H. Sakamoto |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                           |   | Jeffrey H. Sakamoto           |
|   |                                           |   | *Chief Financial Officer*     |

 

1

----
**Exhibit32(b)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation(HickoryTech) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of HickoryTech,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 
| /s/ David A. Christensen |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David A. Christensen     |
| Chief Financial Officer  |
| November 4, 2004    |

 

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00266-CV

Munson Park, Ltd., Appellant

v.

City of Austin, Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-06-001196, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Munson Park, Ltd. no longer wishes to pursue its appeal and has filed a

motion to dismiss that appellee City of Austin, Texas does not oppose. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: January 8, 2009
II 

Calendar No. 301 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1896 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Officer 

Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2007 

Mr. SUNUNU (for himself and Mr. GREGG) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11 Central Street in Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd Charron Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1896 RS

1 SECTION 1. OFFICER JEREMY TODD CHARRON POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 11 Central Street in 

5 Hillsborough, New Hampshire, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd Charron Post Of7 fice’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer Jeremy Todd 

12 Charron Post Office’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 301 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1896 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJeremy Todd Charron Post Office’’. Hillsborough, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Officer al Service located at 11 Central Street in 

AUGUST 1, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 61/096,941 entitled “Intraoral Measurement of Saliva Osmolarity to Measure Hydration Status,” filed September 15, 2008. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention comprises a rapid, non-invasive method that uses saliva to determine and/or monitor a subject's hydration level for diagnostic, treatment, and prophylactic purposes. By determining/monitoring the hydration status of a subject, preventive measures may be applied to prevent heat injuries and deaths.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-24497 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 11A


                           PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.

                Computation of Net Income per Share of Common Stock -
                                       Primary

               (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

                                                           Three months ended
                                                               December 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                            1996        1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period          31,292       30,945

Weighted average number of shares issued during
  the period in connection with the exercise of
  stock options                                                 3           39

Dilutive shares issuable, net of shares assumed to
  have been purchased (at the average market price)
  for treasury with assumed proceeds from the
  contingent exercise of stock options and
  registered equity purchase contracts                        505          664
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total shares -- primary                                    31,800       31,648
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Net income                                              $  31,757    $  27,979
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary earnings per share                              $    1.00    $    0.88
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                          18
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      The undersigned, Michael Mak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  April 15, 2005                  /s/  Michael Mak
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Mak, Chief Financial Officer
#### Bruce McFEE, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 10875.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1937.

R. Brown, of Crestón, Iowa, for appellant.

Kenneth H. Davenport, of Crestón, Iowa, and W. E. Mitchell, D. L. Ross, Folsom Everest, and Karl F. Geiser, all of Council Bluffs, Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed without costs to either party in this court, pursuant to stipulation of parties that the decision in case of Cornelison v. Fitch, 8 Cir., 91 F.2d 5, is controlling.
Case 1:11-cv-02628-BNB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-BNB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-BNB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-BNB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
Section 906 CEO & CFO CertificationsEX-32 7 dex32.htm SECTION 906 CEO & CFO
 CERTIFICATIONS
 Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, DC
 
 The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pilot
 Financial, Inc., Inc. do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
 Quarterly Report of Pilot Financial, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
 year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
 contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pilot Financial,
 Inc.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
 provided to Pilot Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Pilot
 Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 /s/ Ronald R. Shenkin
 President
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 Date: December 31, 2004
NO. 07-15-00238-CR

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE § VS. § SEVENTH COURT § ROSA ELENA ARIZMENDI § OF APPEALS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLEE'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:
Now comes Rosa Elena Arizmendi, Appellee in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file Appellee’s Brief, pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good cause shows the following: 1. This case is on the State’s appeal from the 108 THJudicial District Court in and for Potter County, Texas. 2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS ROSA ELENA ARIZMENDI, and numbered 68589E. 3. Appellee was convicted of Possession of a Controlled Substance, Penalty Group 1, with Intent to Deliver, >400g. 4. Appellee was assessed a sentence of twenty-five (25) years on April 28, 2015. 5. Appellee filed her Motion for New Trial and Motion In Arrest of Judgment on May 15, 2015. The Order Granting New Trial was filed June 16, 2015. 6. Notice of appeal was given by the State on June 22, 2015. 7. Appellant’s Brief was filed on September 8, 2015, and Appellee’s Brief is due on October 28, 2015, after previously granted extension. 8. Appellee was previously granted a second extension of time 10 days from the date that Appellee’s Brief was to be filed; the Court granted the requested extension of 10 days, making the date for filing November 9, 2015. 9. Appellee is currently incarcerated on this charge. 10. Appellee relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested extension: Counsel for Appellee has been unable to upload Appellee’s Brief prior to the 11:59p.m. November 9, 2015, deadline. ACCEPTED 07-15-00238-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS 11/10/2015 3:55:26 AM Vivian Long, Clerk11. There have been two previous ex tensions totaling 30 day s g ranted.
12. Appellee i s r e qu e sting an ex tension of approx imately four to five hours, bring ing the date for filing

of Appellee’s brief November 10, 2015.
12. This Motion is not broug ht for purposes of delay , but so that justice may be done.

WHEREF ORE, P REMISES CONSIDERED , Appellee p r a y s that this Court g rant this Motion To Ex tend Time to F ile A ppellee' s B rief, a nd for such other and further r e lief as the Court may

deem appropriate. Respectfully submitted,

DIANNA L . McCOY Attorney at L aw 112 S.W . 8 t h , Ste. 540 Amarillo, Tex as 79101 Tel: 806 373 4025 F ax : 806 350 5414 dianna.mccoy @ g mail.com

B y : /s/ Dianna L. McCoy DIANNA L . McCOY State B ar No. 24026865 Attorney for Rosa Elena Ariz mendi

CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICE

This is to cert i f

y t h at on November 10, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foreg oing document was served on the 4 7 T H J udicial District Attorney ’s O ffice for Appellant the
St a t e o f Tex as, 501 S. F illmore Street, Suite 5 A Amarillo, Tex a s 7 9101, by electronic service via efile.tx courts.g ov
/s/ Dianna L. McCoy DIANNA L . McCOY
#### ALABAMA POWER CO. v. CITY OF TUSCUMBIA et al.

8 Div. 667.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 7, 1935.

Andrews & Almon, of Sheffield, and Martin, Turner & McWhorter, of Birmingham, for appellant.

John E. Deloney, Jr., of Tuscumbia, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
Order filed March 1 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00 119

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF D.R.A. AND A.R. , children

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 04091J



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). T he notice of appeal was filed February 1 , 2012. The time for filing a contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence has passed; therefore a ppellant is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was
filed

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a )(1). The record has not been filed. Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R.Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (effective May 1, 2012) . The trial and appellate courts are jointly

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if

necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Cheryl Pierce , the deputy official cour t reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before March 12, 2012. If Cheryl Pierce does not timely file the record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing to show cause why the record has not been timely fil ed and why she should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Stock Market Solutions, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard Smitten, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 18, 2004

| | /s/ Richard SmittenRichard Smitten
CEO and CFO
| | ----------------------------------------------