alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John S. Chen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004      /s/ JOHN S. CHEN       John S. Chen   Chief Executive Officer and President  
40
ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

December 29, 2023

CR-2023-0259

Breon Dwayne Humphrey-Sallings v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Madison 

Circuit Court: CC-21-2601) 

NOTICE 

You are hereby notified that on December 29, 2023, the following action was 

taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals:

Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 LORRIE M. HINZO , 2 Petitioner-Appellee, 3

v. No. 34,352 4 JASON P. HINZO , 5 Respondent-Appellant, 6 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex. rel 7 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT , 8 Intervenor. 9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 10 Mary W. Rosner, District Judge 11 Advanced Legal Resolutions, LLC 12 Sarah Van Cott 13 Las Cruces, NM 14 for Appellee 15 Jason P. Hinzo 16 Sioux Fall, SD 17 Pro Se 18 Hector B. Balderas, Attorney General 19 Lila Bird, Special Assistan Attorney General 20Santa Fe, NM 1 for Intervenor 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION 3 VIGIL, Chief Judge. 4 {1} Respondent appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to modify child 5 support. This Court’s second notice of proposed summary disposition proposed to 6 affirm various findings of the district court, but to reverse the judgment below because 7 it awarded support for periods during which Respondent could not be characterized 8 as a noncustodial parent for purposes of NMSA 1978, Section 27-2-28(A) (2009). 9 [2CN 4] That notice proposed to remand this case to the district court for entry of a 10 support order that is consistent with the requirements of Section 27-2-28. [Id.] The 11 State has filed no response. Respondent, however, has filed a document in which he 12 does not oppose the proposed summary dis position. We, therefore, reverse the 13 judgment entered below and remand to the district court for the entry of an appropriate 14 order of support. 15

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 16

______________________________ 17 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge 182 WE CONCUR: 1

___________________________________ 2 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 3

___________________________________ 4 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 5
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


         I, Michael Knaisch, Chief Financial Officer of Front Porch Digital Inc.
(the  "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003 of the  Registrant,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                               By: /s/ MICHAEL KNAISCH
                                                   ---------------------
                                               Name: Michael Knaisch
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer

August 19, 2003

-----------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Porch Digital Inc. and will be retained by Front Porch Digital
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William R. Maris, VicePresident — Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1)                                      The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                                      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  |       August 14, 2008 |   | /s/ William R. Maris                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                |   | William R. Maris                                         |
|   |                                                |   | Vice President –  Finance & Administration |
|   |                                                |   | Chief Financial Officer                                  |
|   |                                                |   | (Principal Financial  and Accounting  Officer)           |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-31878, Amendment No. 4) of our reports dated February 25, 2000,
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
ClearCommerce Corporation, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also
consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Financial Data" in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Austin, Texas

September 19, 2000
U3-/r

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 01-13-00660-CR OFFENSE: 19.02 (Murder)

Treyvon Raymond Williams v. The

STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Fort Bend

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 400th District Court

DATE: 12/16/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 12-DCR-60402

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Treyvon Raymond Williams v. The

STYLE: State of Texas

APPBLLAMT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

'j&ru&g>

DATE: Qljjni jS-Oiy

JUDGE:

CCA#: US-IS

litA U4*AfiMr-.

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STANLEY ASHER COLE, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-139-JFM, CA-01-1907-JFM) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Asher Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Stanley Asher Cole appeals the district court’s orders denyinghis motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cole , Nos. CR-87-139-JFM; CA-01-1907-JFM (D. Md. Jul. 10, 2001 & Aug. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 11, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.1 Total Net Borrowing and Lending in Credit Markets1** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determin ed that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set fo rth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 28 U.S. C. § 1915A. 1 28U.S.C . § 191 5. 2 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10819 S u m m ary C al en da r G AM A G AB RI EL AN TU N EZ P l a i n ti ff - A p p ell a n t v. F N U M E N D E Z , O ffic e r , M id d le to n U n it D efen da n t - A pp el l ee

A p p ea lf

rom the U n i ted S tates D i stri ct C ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 08- C V
- 44 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , B A R K S D A L E , an d E L R O D , C i rcui t Ju dg es . P E R C U R I A M: * Feder alpr i so nerG am a G abr i elA nt unez br ought a pr o s e 42 U . S. C . § 1983 ac t i o n a gain s tO f

f i c e rM e nde z f

o r a l l e ge dl y t hr o w i ng hi m a ga i ns t a w al la nd i nj ur i ng hi s s pi ne . The di s t r i c t c o ur t di s m i s s e d hi s c o m pl ai nta s m al i c i o us a nd 1 as t i m e b ar r e d. 2 United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 5, 20 09 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 10819

Baileyv. J

ohnson , 8 4 6F .2 d 1 0 1 9 , 1 0 2 1 ( 5 thC ir . 1 9 8 8) (p erc uri a m). 3 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 9 7 e(a). See Woo dfo rd v. Ngo , 54 8 U .S. 81 , 88(20 06) (hol ding for the 4 prison -offici al petitione r that “apri sonermust complet e th e a dmini strativereview process in acco rdance with the appl ic ab le pro cedur al rul es, inclu ding dea dlin es, a s a precon ditio n to b rin gin gsuitinf

ed er al co urt .”). 2 T h e d is t r ic tc o u r td id n o t a b u s e it s d is c r e t io n i n d is m is s in gA n t u n e z ’s com pl ai n tas m al i ci ou s. “ R epeti t i ou s l i t i gati on of vi rt u al l y identi calcauses of act i on i s s u b jec tt o di sm i ssal. . . as m al i ci ou s. ” A n t u n ez ha d brou gh t a pri or 3 s ui ta ga i ns tM e nde z b as e d o n t he s am e fac t s a nd r ai s i ng t he s am e c l ai m s he bri n gs i n t h e present act i on . Th e di st ri ctcourt in th at pri or c ase gran t ed M en dez sum m ary j u dg m en tbecau se A n t u n ez fai l ed to properl y exh au st adm i ni st r at i ve pri so n g ri evanc e r em edi es be f or e b r i ngi ng s ui t , as r equi r ed by t he Pri so n L i t i gat i on R ef or m A c t . Spec i f

i c al l y, af

t er A n tu nez r ec ei ved an 4 u n favorab l e response t o h i s S t ep 1 gri evan ce f i l i n g, he f

i l ed h i s Step 2 gri evan ce o ut s i de o f t he t e n da y pe r i o d a pr i s o ne r has t o s ubm i t an ap pe al . Th e di st ri ct c o ur tw as w i t hi n i t s di scr e t i o n t o s ua s po nt e s c r e e n t hi s r e pe t i t i o us c o m pl ai nt an d d i sm i ss i tas m al i ci ou s. AF F I RMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
     $ in thousands, except per share data.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                         31124
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15475
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                 
<INVENTORY>                                    15211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               70411
<PP&E>                                         64064
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                138409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20725
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        1
<COMMON>                                         240
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  138409
<SALES>                                        36148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                          26145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (649)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.14)
        


</TABLE>
----

----

| 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                             |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      April 15, 2008 |   |                                                                             |
|                      | By:    | /s/      David      Naylor                                                       |
|                      |   | David      Naylor                                                                |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer |

----
#### Baker *v.*DuBois, County Treas.

(No. 25559

Decided December 26, 1935.)

*Mr. Eli G. Frankenstein, Mr. Lawrence B, Swarts*and *Mr. Joseph W. Shorts,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Paul A. Baden,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.-

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                  0
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     262,491
<ALLOWANCES>                       43,783
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  248,960
<PP&E>                             22,692
<DEPRECIATION>                     14,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,602,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             505,028
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                           13,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                        510,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,602,425
<SALES>                            94,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  546,799
<CGS>                             171,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     617,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    25,965
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                25,965
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       25,965
<EPS-BASIC>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0


</TABLE>
#### D. C. WILKERSON, Tax Collector, et al., Appellants, v. AIKIN OPEN AIR SCHOOL, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., and John G. Blocker, of St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Thompson, Aikin & Brock, of St. Peters-burg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  October 31, 2007
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: October 31, 2007
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Tassone, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

•              The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and

•              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 28,  2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ James A.  Tassone                      |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            |   |   |   | James A.  Tassone, Chief Financial Officer |

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. and willbe retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed  filed by the Company for purposes of Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

----