alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,666,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,674,503<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,593,665<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,674,503<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,795<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,042<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,753  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, total assets include other assets of $7,912. 
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of
$80,838.
<F4>Total revenue includes interest and other revenue.
<F5>Total expense includes general and administrative.
<F6>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 33.2

                REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICING
                 CRITERIA PURSUANT TO ITEM 1122 OF REGULATION AB
                     FIRST NATIONAL CREDIT CARD CENTER, INC.

                                                            Date: March 27, 2009

     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First National Credit
Card Center, Inc. (the "Servicer"), hereby certifies as follows:

     (1) The Servicer is responsible for assessing its compliance with the
servicing criteria set forth in 17 C.F.R. Section 229.1122(d) ("Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB"), except for servicing criteria specified in (1)(iii); (2)(iii)
and (vi); 3(iii) and (iv); and 4(x) of Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, which the
Servicer has determined are inapplicable to the activities it performs with
respect to the credit card asset backed securities transactions issued by First
National Master Note Trust (the "Platform") being serviced (such applicable
criteria, after giving effect to the exceptions identified above, the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008
relating to the servicing of the Platform;

     (2) The Servicer used the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB to assess compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria;

     (3) The Servicer is in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
relating to the Platform as of and for the year ending December 31, 2008 in all
material respects; and

     (4) Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report for the Platform on the Servicer's
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for
the year ending December 31, 2008.

<PAGE>

                                        FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD CENTER,
                                        INC.


                                        By /s/ Stephen F. Eulie
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Stephen F. Eulie
                                           President


                                        FIRST NATIONAL BANK CREDIT CARD CENTER,
                                        INC.


                                        By /s/ Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick J. Burns, Sr.
                                           Chief Financial Officer

              [Signature page to Report on Assessment of Compliance
                   of First National Credit Card Center, Inc.]
#### John J. PALMISANO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Frank P. SCHADWELL, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 13997.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 4, 1932.

Herbert W. Kaiser, of New Orleans, for appellant. ■

H. W. Robinson, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit for $262.14 based upon an alleged verbal contract. There was judgment below in defendant’s favor, and plaintiff has appealed.

It' appears that the defendant owned an excavating machine and undertook certain work in connection with the construction of the Eleanore McMain I-Iigh School.

Plaintiff contends that he procured the work for defendant, -and that it was performed under an agreement that he was to receive one-half of the profits, which, he claims, amounted to the sum sued for. Defendant denies that he had any agreement with plaintiff to share the profits derived from the contract, which, he insists, was undertaken on his own account.

There were no witnesses to the verbal agreement and the circumstances under which the work was performed and the price paid appear to corroborate defendant’s statement. At any rate, the plaintiff has failed to establish the contract which is the basis of this suit.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


May 13, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, NASDAQ International Dividend
Achievers Index Trust, Series 2


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, NASDAQ International Dividend Achievers Index Trust, Series 2 set forth above (the
“Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on May 13, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-194807) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_________________ 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1



UHF INCORPORATED

CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. ss.1350



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of UHF Incorporated, (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 7, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser
|                       |  |     |  | Ronald C. Schmeiser    
|                       |  |     |  | President              



- 14 -
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10363

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FLOYD KEITH SULLINS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-114-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Floyd Keith Sullins

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sullins has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Sullins’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel or threats against him; we therefore decline to consider 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 27, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10363 Document: 00513358719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2016
No. 15-10363

2

the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 

739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014); United States 

v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 176-78 & n.11 (5th Cir. 1984). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Sullins’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10363 Document: 00513358719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2016
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 0 1 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

H E A T H H I L L ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o

. 5 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 5 6

- 1

B e f o r e K I N G
, S T E W A R T , a n d H A Y N E S
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t H e a t h H i l l h a s m o v e d
f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. H i l l h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t

r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s

e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 9, 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30013 Document: 00511168322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2010
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 oftitle 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of TeliaSonera AB,a Swedish company (the “*Company*”),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1)              the Annual Report onForm 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “*Report*”)  fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

2)              theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ ANDERS IGEL |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
|   |   | Name:           |   | Anders Igel |
|   |   | Title:          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Date:           |   | April 6, 2006 |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24571]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), October 20, 2008.

Place:  4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status:  Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the September 15, 2008 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Legislative Report.
    3. Quarterly Reports.
    a. Investment Policy Review.
    b. Vendor Financial Reports.
    4. Mid-Year Financial Audit.

Parts Closed to the Public

    5. Procurement.
    6. Confidential Financial Information.

Contact Person For More Information: 
    Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 
942-1640.

    Dated: October 9, 2008.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. E8-24571 Filed 10-10-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Case 1:11-cv-02709-LTB Document 6 Filed 11/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### EPSTEIN v. NORTH DADE REALTY, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  Certification

I, Kevin Armstrong, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cosi, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

By: /s/ Kevin Armstrong
    -------------------------
Kevin Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATE OF CFO
  (3)
    
    the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certificate is
attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and(4)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 Dated: June 30, 2008
    /s/ Leslye L. GrindleLeslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32(a)**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation(HickoryTech) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, John E. Duffy, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ John E. Duffy       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| John E. Duffy           |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| November 14, 2003  |

 

1

----
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellant, v. BELL OIL & GAS COMPANY, Burk-Divide Oil Company, Consolidated, and Reno Oil Company, Appellee.

No. 8438.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1937.

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

'PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing in the above numbered and entitled cause, 91 F.2d 509, is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
     $ in thousands, except per share data.
</LEGEND>                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         43223
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    13406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               81907
<PP&E>                                         63116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28271
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       243
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148486
<SALES>                                        50701
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          31551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2808
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .24
        


</TABLE>
#### David SHOLTZ et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. F. A. THOMPSON, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Cary D. Landis, of Tallahassee, and James B. Watson, of Pensacola, for plaintiffs in error.

G. B. Fishback, of Orlando, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error.