alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John S. Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Sybase, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ JOHN S. CHENName:
    
    John S. ChenTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
 I, Pieter A. Van der Vorst, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Sybase, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORSTName:
    
    Pieter A. Van der VorstTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Michael Finley, certify that:

 

1.                                     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Boingo Wireless, Inc.; and

 

2.                                     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:   May 8, 2019 | /s/ MICHAEL FINLEY                                                                |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Michael Finley                                                                    |
|                     | *Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board   (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
EX-10.9(a)



 EXHIBIT 10.9(a) 

April 7, 2014 
 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC 

522 Fifth Avenue, 13th Floor 
 New York, New York 10036 

 

	Re:	Ceres Managed Futures LLC: Amended Schedules 1 and 2 to the Alternative 


	    	Investment Selling Agent Agreement 

 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Pursuant to paragraph 13(c) of the Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement dated November 12, 2013, as amended from time to time
(the “Agreement”), between, among others, Ceres Managed Futures LLC (“CMF”), the general partner of each of the limited partnerships listed on Schedule 1 thereto (each, a “Partnership,” and together, the
“Partnerships”), and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (“MSSB”), CMF is hereby confirming that Schedules 1 and 2 to the Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with Schedules 1 and 2 attached
hereto. 
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, by signing below MSSB hereby agrees to, acknowledges and accepts the
amendment of the Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2014. 







 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our discussions, kindly sign and
return to us a counterpart hereof (by mail, facsimile or email) as soon as possible. 
  

					
	Sincerely,
		
		 	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 		 	Alper Daglioglu
		 		 	President and Director
		
		 	EACH PARTNERSHIP LISTED ON SCHEDULE 1 HERETO
			
		 	By:	 	Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of each Partnership
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 		 	Alper Daglioglu
		 		 	President and Director


  

			
	Confirmed, accepted and agreed to:
	
	MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeremy Beal

	Name:	 	Jeremy Beal
	Title:	 	Executive Director


  
 Page 2 








 Schedule 1 
  

					
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 STATE AND DATE OF

ORGANIZATION
	  	 EFFECTIVE DATE

	Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.	  	New York; June 15, 1998	  	October 1, 2013








 Schedule 2 
  

			
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 ONGOING SELLING AGENT FEE

	Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P.	  	2.90% per year of the adjusted net assets of the Partnership (computed monthly by multiplying the adjusted net assets of the Partnership by 2.90% and dividing the result thereof by 12) 1

  

	1 	Adjusted net assets are month-end Net Assets increased by the current month’s management fee, ongoing selling agent fee, incentive fee accrual and other expenses and any redemptions or distributions as of the end
of such month.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             70,000 
<SECURITIES>                                            0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,920,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,994,000 
<INVENTORY>                                     1,598,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,673,000 
<PP&E>                                            584,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    164,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,247,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,753,000 
<BONDS>                                                 0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                           44,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,450,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,247,000 
<SALES>                                        18,616,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,616,000 
<CGS>                                          17,593,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,593,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                163,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,737,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,737,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,737,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.39)
        


</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.101 Nonfinancial Business1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TOMMIE LEE GAY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-352 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 15, 2016.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Lisa Campbell, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Judith Ellis, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Chief Judge.

In this Anders 1 appeal, Tommie Lee Gay appeals his judgment and sentence for battery. We affirm the judgment and sentence impo sed without comment. However, because the written order of probation differed from t he trial court's oral

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2 - pronouncement of sentence, we reverse and remand for entry of a corrected written order of probation. Gay was found guilty of battery (domestic violence, second or subsequent offense) following a jury trial. At sentencing, the trial cour t orally sentenced Gay to twenty-four months' probation and ordered him to complete fifty hours of community service at a minimum rate of four hours per month. The written order of probation mirrored the sentence pronounced in open court, except that the written order required the community service hours to be completed at a minimum rate o f five hours per

month.

A trial court's written sentenc e must conform to its oral pron ouncement; when the two differ, that constit utes reversible error. See Ri vera v. State, 34 So. 3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). In this case, the written order o f probation differs from the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence as to the rate at which Gay must complete his community service hours. Accordingly, we reverse and reman d for the trial court to amend the written order of probation to conform to the trial co urt's oral pronouncement of this condition. In all other aspects, we affirm. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

WALLACE and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1794 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1794

To amend the Federal Direct Loan Program to provide that interest shall 
not accrue on Federal Direct Loans for active duty service members and 
                             their spouses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2007

   Mr. Bayh introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Direct Loan Program to provide that interest shall 
not accrue on Federal Direct Loans for active duty service members and 
                             their spouses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Interest Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. NO ACCRUAL OF INTEREST FOR ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE MEMBERS AND 
              THEIR SPOUSES.

    Section 455 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) No Accrual of Interest for Active Duty Service Members and 
Their Spouses.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this part, and except as provided in paragraph (3), interest on 
        a loan made under this part shall not accrue for an eligible 
        borrower.
            ``(2) Eligible borrower.--In this subsection, the term 
        `eligible borrower' means an individual--
                    ``(A) who is--
                            ``(i) serving on active duty during a war 
                        or other military operation or national 
                        emergency; or
                            ``(ii) performing qualifying National Guard 
                        duty during a war or other military operation 
                        or national emergency; or
                    ``(B) who is the spouse of an individual described 
                in subparagraph (A).
            ``(3) Limitation.--An individual who qualifies as an 
        eligible borrower under this subsection may receive the benefit 
        of this subsection for not more than 60 months.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         171,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,857,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,371,000
<PP&E>                                       1,905,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,211,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,169,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,168,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,169,000
<SALES>                                        699,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               699,000
<CGS>                                          701,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  701,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               780,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (808,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (808,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (808,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Michael L. Parker, a President and Director of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in the year  covered  by this  annual  report,  of  WASHINGTON  MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS2;

     2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information  in these  reports,  taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or  servicing  information
required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  servicer  under the pooling and
servicing, or similar,  agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicer
under the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement  and based  upon my
knowledge and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and
except as disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its  obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The  reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating  to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting  a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:

Alliance  Mortgage  Company,  Downey  Savings and Loan Assoc,  First  Nationwide
Mortgage Corp, Flagstar Bank, FSB, Geenpoint Mortgage Company,  MidAmerica Bank,
FSB, US Bank Home Mortgage, Washington Mutual


Dated: March 15, 2004
                                         /s/ Michael L. Parker
                                         Michael L. Parker,
                                         President and Director
#### DAVID IRA KNAPP, AN INFANT, BY WILBUR KNAPP, HIS NEXT FRIEND, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE, v. C. F. MUELLER ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS.

Argued May 21, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the defendant-appellee, *Greenstone & Greenstone (John A. Laird,*of counsel).

For the prosecutors-appellants, *Kalisch & Kalisch (Isidor Kalisch,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dill, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas in a workmen’s compensation case, which court had reversed the action of the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau in dismissing the respondents petition for compensation. The question before us is purely one of fact, namely, did David Ira Knapp, a lad only a few months over sixteen .years of age, sustain his injuries as the result of an accident arising out of and during the course of his employment?

The rule is well established that this court will not reverse a judgment of the Supreme Court on fact findings in workmen’s compensation cases,.if the same are supported by competent evidence. *Berlinger*v. *Medal Silk Co.,*113 *N. J. L.*476; 174 *Atl. Rep.*558; *Ford Motor Co.*v. *Fernandez,*114 *N. J. L.*202, 204, and cases cited.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states “It seems that the probable occurrence was that the boy slipped while he *187was resting at the end of the machine and the injuries were then suffered. It seems to us that the probabilities of the occurrence more strongly preponderate in favor of this view so as to compel us to factually find.”

Our examination of the testimony leads us to the conclusion, that there is competent evidence to support the judgment of the Supreme Court.

Judgment affirmed.

*For affirmance*— -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-118339) pertaining to the Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan for theregistration of 868,992 shares of Bakers Footwear Group Inc.’s common stock of our report datedMarch 9, 2005, except for paragraphs 1 and 2 of Note 20, as towhich the dates are March 10, 2005 and March 31, 2005,respectively, with respect to the financial statements of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. included inits Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005, filed with the Securities andExchange Commission.    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
#### Roy VALDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 44424-44427.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1971.

Sam A. Maida, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and F. M. Stover, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

The convictions are for the sale of heroin; the punishment, 25 years in each case on a plea of guilty before the court.

There was stipulated testimony entered into the records and a written judicial confession by the appellant in each case.

Appellant was represented by employed counsel and is represented on these appeals by court-appointed counsel.

Counsel has filed a brief stating that he has examined the records and has consulted with appellant concerning the cases. Counsel finds no grounds of error which may be urged for reversals of these causes.

The records contain a witnessed certificate signed by the appellant acknowl*228edging receipt of a copy of counsel’s brief and a copy of the transcript and the statement of facts prepared for these appeals, all of which were presented to him in open court.

Appellant has filed no pro se brief herein.

A careful examination of the records before us has been made and we find that the appeals are frivolous.

The requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969), have been fully satisfied.

The judgments are affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as a Commercial 
Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as a 
commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, 
Inspectorate America Corporation, 3306 Loop 197 North, Texas City, TX 
77590, has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, 
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to 
employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger 
service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific 
gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9cacbd987c5c8cbc1d8e9cdc1da87cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07646577296b66656f7647636f7429606871">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as commercial 
gauger became effective on March 15, 2007. The next triennial 
inspection date will be scheduled for March 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-2403 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Harris et al., Board of Commrs. of Morrow County, *v.*The State, ex rel. Cochran et al., Soldiers Relief Comm. of Morrow County.

(No. 25663

Decided December 26, 1935.

*340
      *Mr. Nelson Campbell,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. T. B. Mateer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Benjamin Olds,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.