alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1178

KATHRYN L. KERSHNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GALE A. NORTON, Secretary, Department of

Interior,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (3:04-cv-00010-WCB)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kathryn L. Kershner, Appellant Pro Se. Sherri Evans Harris, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., Helen Campbell

Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kathryn L. Kershner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on her claims of discrimination and

retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-

796 (1999). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

May 24, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on January 26, 2006.

Because Kershner failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: June 9, 2005Release dates | 
 Coded tables | 
 Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | 
 PDF (450 KB)
F.227 Investment in Bank Personal Trusts and Estates
   Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates                                                                                                                               
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Description
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2004   Q1
2004   Q2
2004   Q3
2004   Q4
2005   Q1
LineBank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability
	56.6
	-59.9
	-2.4
	-26.3
	-22.4
	-23.3
	-23.3
	-23.3
	-19.8
	-12.1
	1Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability
	56.6
	-59.9
	-2.4
	-26.3
	-22.4
	-23.3
	-23.3
	-23.3
	-19.8
	-12.1
	2
|
|Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Release dates | 
Coded tables | 
Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releasesHome | Economic research and
dataAccessibility | Contact Us Last update: June 9, 2005
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________ NO. 09
- 1 1
- 00 686
- CR

_________ ____ ________ TERRY DALE CARNES , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ _________________________ _ On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11
- 10
- 10957 CR

________________________________________ _________________________ _ ORDER The brief of the appella nt was originally due on August 13 , 2012. The Court granted a final extension, which expired on October 12, 2012. On November 29 , 2012, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for the purpose of determining why the brief of the appellant has not bee n filed and to determine

w hether there is good cause for appellate counsel to be removed and replaced with substitute counsel

. In a hearing conducted on December 20 , 2012, the trial court2 found that the appellant, Terry Dale Carnes , desires to a ppeal and that substituting counsel would further delay the appeal. At the hearing, counsel admitted that he had not completed the brief, notwithstanding the expiration of his final extension, but he claimed that he “should be able to get that completed” by February 1, 2013. The trial cour t asked counsel if it were reasonable to expect the brief to be filed by February 8, 2013, and counsel replied that it would.
T he trial court shall conduct a hearing within thirty days of the date of this order. If at the hearing counsel fails to prove that he has prepared and filed with the Court of Appeals a brief together with a motion for leave to allow late filing of the brief, the trial court shall consider whether there is cause to remove appointed counsel and replace him with new counsel

. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. a rt. 26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 201 2 ). The trial court shall prepare written findings and recommendations. A supplemental clerk’s record, containing any orders and findings of the trial court , together with a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing here o rdered, shall be filed on or befo re March 28 , 2013

. ORDER ENTERED February 14 , 2013

. PER CURIAM Before Mc Keithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger , JJ.
**Exhibit
          32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
        connection with the periodic report of Energroup Holdings Corporation (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Shi Huashan, Chief
        Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
        as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
        1350
        of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
        at
        the dates and for the periods indicated.
  Date:    September 2, 2008
                  /s/
                      Shi HuashanShi
                      Huashan
                    Chief
                      Executive Officer
                    (Principal
                      Executive
                      Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energroup Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), we, Stephen R. Fry and Thomas J. Howells, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *04/13/07*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/ Stephen R. Fry***                                   |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Stephen R. Fry, President and Director***               |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Energroup Technologies Corporation***                   |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                                                 |
| *Date:*** | *04/13/07*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Thomas J. Howells***                                 |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Thomas J. Howells, Secretary, Treasurer and Director*** |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Energroup Technologies Corporation***                   |
Exhibit 99(b)





Independent Accountants' Report





The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation



We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2 (the loans) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 7, 2001 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.  Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of loans has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 7, 2001 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.





/s/ KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004







Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2 has been conducted by Household Consumer Lending, as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 7, 2001.





|/s/ Joe Vozar              | /s/ Jorge Cordon             
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Chief Financial Officer-   | Managing Director-Operations-
|Household Consumer Lending | Household Consumer Lending   
|                           |                              
|                           |                              
|February 28, 2004          | February 28, 2004            
|Date                       | Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       11773 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             11773 
<PP&E>                                      382818 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              394591 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        78414 
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   2123467 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                (1807290)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                394591 
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            183761 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (183761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00420-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. LUIS MOY,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This will confirm that a further status/scheduling hearing regarding Defendant Moy

is set Monday, November 28, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom C401, Byron G. Rogers

United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Defendant must be

present.

Government Counsel in Washington, D.C. may appear by telephone. Counsel are

requested to contact chambers (303-844-2527) prior to the hearing with a land line phone

number where they will be available. 

Dated: November 9, 2011

Case 1:11-cr-00420-LTB Document 15 Filed 11/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0064

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RONALD ALAN HUMMEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2021

03/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0064
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Agee, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/Jeffrey D. Agee               Jeffrey D. AgeeChief Executive Officer Date:  March 13, 2009

----
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans
owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2 (the loans) has been conducted
by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 7,
2001 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management
is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's compliance based on
our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in
compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the
procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set
forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the loans has been
conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance
with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
November 7, 2001 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of home equity
loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2 has been conducted by
Household Consumer Lending, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its
capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,
in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated November 7, 2001.



/s/ JOE VOZAR                               /s/ JORGE CORDON
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Joe Vozar                                   Jorge Cordon
Chief Financial Officer-                    Managing Director- Operations-
Household Consumer Lending                  Household Consumer Lending


February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00422-REB-02

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

2. HAI MANH DO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On February 12, 2013, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference to

reset the sentencing hearing in this matter. After conferring with counsel and with their

consent, 

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on March 28, 2013, commencing at 9:00 a.m., the court shall conduct

the sentencing hearing; and

2. That the deadline for the filing of motions for downward departure and

variance, as well as objections to the pre-sentence investigation report shall be March

14, 2013.

Dated: February 12, 2013

Case 1:11-cr-00422-REB Document 195 Filed 02/12/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
----

----

| 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                           |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      April 15, 2008 |   |                                                                           |
|                      | By:    | /s/      P.      Leslie      Hammond        |
|                      |   | P.      Leslie Hammond                                                         |
|                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                   |

----
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 7, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.121 Money Market Mutual Funds1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00460-CV

Jason CAMPBELL,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Ben LUONG,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-10868

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that one-half of the costs of appeal are taxed against appellant/crossappellee, Jason Campbell, and one-half of the costs of appeal are taxed against appellee/crossappellant, Ben Luong.

SIGNED July 19, 2017.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice