alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to Registration StatementNos. 333-190096 and 333-190096-01 of First National Master Note Trust and First National Funding LLC on Form S-3 of ourreports dated March 29, 2016, relating to the Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for First National Bank of Omaha, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FirstNational Master Note Trust and First National Funding LLC for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Omaha, Nebraska 

March 29, 2016
Exhibit 32.01


I, Michael O'Donnell, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sbarro, Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Quarterly Report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.

Date:  November 19, 2003

/s/ MICHAEL O'DONNELL
-------------------------------------
Michael O'Donnell
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SBARRO,  INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SBARRO,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 10, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Foundation First Corporation, Omaha, Nebraska, to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Western State Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of Western State Bank, both of Waterloo, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 9, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-24527 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jacinta Sit, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Oxford Technologies, Inc. on the Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oxford Technologies, Inc.







|                        |  |     |  |                                                              
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/Jacinta Sit                                               
|                        |  |     |  | Jacinta Sit, President                                       
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1713 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1713

 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                             of Rosa Parks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2007

   Mr. Obama (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Bayh, Mr. 
Coleman, Mr. Biden, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Voinovich, Mrs. Boxer, 
   Mr. Brown, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
    Kerry, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Levin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Schumer, Ms. 
 Stabenow, and Mr. Reid) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                             of Rosa Parks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROSA PARKS COMMEMORATIVE POSTAGE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The Postmaster General shall issue a commemorative 
postage stamp in honor of Rosa Parks.
    (b) Denomination and Design.--The commemorative postage stamp 
issued under this Act shall--
            (1) be issued in the denomination used for 1st class mail 
        up to 1 ounce in weight; and
            (2) bear such designs as the Postmaster General shall 
        determine.
    (c) Issuance Period.--The commemorative postage stamp issued under 
this Act shall--
            (1) be placed on sale as soon as practicable after the date 
        of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) be sold for such period thereafter as the Postmaster 
        General shall determine.
                                 <all>
```
#### WIECZORICK v. WILLIAMS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
**EXHIBIT 23**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121427) pertaining to thePrimus Guaranty, Ltd. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and Written Compensation Agreements withCertain Employees of Primus Guaranty, Ltd., and Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-135108) of our reports datedMarch 11, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Primus Guaranty Ltd., and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting of Primus Guaranty Ltd., included in this Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2008.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc.
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
        2005,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                  or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc. and will be retained by Streicher Mobile Fueling,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon
        request.
 
 /s/
        Richard E. Gathright
 Richard
        E. Gathright
 Chief
        Executive Officer and President
 November
        14, 2005
 
 
 /s/
        Michael S. Shore
 Michael
        S. Shore
 Chief
        Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
 November
        14, 2005
#### FARRANT v. GILLESPIE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without' opinion.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code),
the undersigned officer of TeliaSonera AB, a Swedish company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

|April 7, 2005 |  | By: | /s/KIM IGNATIUSKim Ignatius
Chief Financial Officer
|------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended May 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I Peter H. Jackson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:    July 10, 2008

|/s/  PETER H. JACKSON
Peter H. JacksonChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Intraware, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer) | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I
Wendy A. Nieto, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)        The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)        The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:    July 10, 2008

|/s/  WENDY A. NIETO
Wendy A. NietoChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Intraware, Inc.
(Principal Financial Officer) | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#### J. L. McDONALD, Appellant, v. Thelma Blanche Myles McDONALD, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Ernest Dart, of Jacksonville, for appellant. ’

J. H. Ross, of Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for the respective parties.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 95-4192NE

_____________ In the matter of: JAS Enterprises, Inc., * * Debtor, *

____________________ * * In the matter of: JAS Enterprises, Inc., * * Debtor-Appellant, * * Richard J. Butler, Chapter 7 Trustee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of Appellant, * Nebraska. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * William Stock; Janette Stock; * * Interested Parties-Appellees,* * Unsecured Creditors Committee, * * Interested Party. *

_____________ Submitted: May 19, 1997

Filed: May 30, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.-2-

JAS Enterprises, Inc. (JAS) appeals the distri ct court's judgment that allowed an adminis trative expense claim filed by William and Janette Stock. On appeal, JA S contends (1) the bankruptcy court's finding that JAS received an actual tangible benefit is clearly erro neous, (2) the bankruptcy court improperly measured the administrative expens es, and (3) the Stocks are estopped from obtaining administrative expenses by failing to mit

igate their damages. The district court carefully considered these issues, and having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we agree with its analysis. We thus affirm for the r

easons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### RIVERS v. GRANT.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

PHU T CHIM, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 449 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gaylord M. Karren, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



DATE:  March 29, 2004







/s/ Gaylord M. Karren

___________________________
Gaylord M. Karren
Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer

Electric Aquagenics Unlimited, In
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

OCTOBER 21, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100468 TIMOTHY ASHLOCK, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

2. ED100624 ROCKY OLIPHANT, APP V. SIF, RES

3. ED100718 LENA JOHNSTON, RES V VINCENZO ACQUAVIVA, APP

4. ED100737 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BOYCE BROWN, APP

5. ED101111 PARVEEN MOHAMMED, RES V COUNTRY MUTUAL INS., 

APP

6. ED101589 GEORGE KNIEST, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
----

----

| 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      April 15, 2008 |   |                                                                                                                 |
|                      | By:    | /s/      David      Naylor                |
|                      |   | David      Naylor                                                                                                    |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer                                     |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02461-BNB

CLYDE HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICER MICHAEL LUMBARD, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER LAURA FRANKLIN, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER NOEL IKEDO, Denver Police Dept., and

OFFICER JOHN DOE, Denver Police Dept., 

Defendants.

 

ORDER DRAWING CASE

 

After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, the Court has determined that

this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the

case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR

8.2D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED December 13, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT Document 10 Filed 12/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Taylor, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lagaña, J.), rendered April 14, 1988, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to inform him, prior to summations, that *923it would be considering the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the second degree in rendering its verdict *(see,*CPL 320.20 [5]; *People v Brown,*121 AD2d 326; *People v Garcia,*76 AD2d 867). However, upon our review of the record, we find this error to be harmless, as it cannot be said that defense counsel’s summation would have been affected by the knowledge that the manslaughter in the second degree charge would be considered by the trier of fact *(see, People v Miller,*70 NY2d 903, 907; *see also, People v Boyd,*150 AD2d 786; *People v Montgomery,*116 AD2d 669).

We decline to disturb the sentence imposed *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 I 0 1 21

. COREY RI TTER v . HELEN LOPEZ

.

On Decem

ber 3 0
, 2 0 2 0
, t h e t ri al co u rt en tered a n o r d e r i n t h i s l eg i t i m at i o n
act i on , w h i ch d en ied Co rey Ri t t er’ s em er g en cy m o t i o n t o rem o v e t h e cu s t o dy

ev al u at o r an d t o s tri k e t h e cu s t o d y ev al u at i on rep ort . On J an u ary 1 3 , 2 02 1
, t h e t ri al

co u r t e n t ered a cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew, an d Ri t t er fi l ed t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct io n

. Un d er OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ), a p art y m ay req u es t i n t erl o cu to ry rev i ew o n l y i f t h e

t ri al co u rt cert i fi es wi t h i n t en d ay s o f en try o f t h e o rd er at i s s u e t h at i m m ed iat e rev i ew

s h o u ld b e h ad

. A t i m el y cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew i s a j u ri s d i ct i o n al

req u i rem en t

. See Vo n W

a l dn er v. Ba l d

wi n / Ch es h i re, In c. , 1 3 3 Ga

. Ap p

. 2 3
, 2 4 (2 ) (2 0 9 SE2 d 7 1 5 ) (1 9 7 4 ). If t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew i s n o t en t ered wi t h in

t h e p res cri b ed t en -d ay p eri o d
, i t i s u n t i m el y , an d th e p art y s eek i n g rev i ew m u s t wai t

u n t i l t h e f

i n al ju d g m en t t o ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); Du ke v. St a t e , 3 0 6 Ga.
1 7 1 , 1 7 8 (3 ) (a) (8 2 9 SE2 d 3 48 ) (2 0 1 9 ). Here, t h e cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev iew was is s u ed 1 4 d ay s aft er en try o f t h e

o r d e r o n ap p eal

. Acco rd i n g l y , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s id er t h i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED. February 16, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/16/2021
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0402

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ADRIAN ABELARDO GARCIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including January 30, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 22 2023

12/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0402