alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| /s/ Mark. A. Klein                                                                           |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Print      Name: Mark A. Klein                                                               |
| Title:  President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive    Officer) |
| Date:  November      15, 2010                                                      |

| * | This      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This      certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by      reference into any suchfiling. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Christopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of LancerCorporation, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 ofLancer Corporation;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.             Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.            Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.             All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b.            Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 12, 2004

 

 
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHES                       |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Christopher D.  Hughes, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gary D. McGaha, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of SouthernCommunity Bancshares, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:
     a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]
     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004        /s/ Gary D. McGaha   Gary D. McGaha Principal Executive Officer
No. 72-6296.

#### Sappington *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthis annual report of Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidF. Brussard, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

·       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periodspresented in the Report.

| /s/ DAVID F. BRUSSARD                     |
|-------------------------------------------|
| David F. Brussard                         |
| *President, Chief Executive  Officer and* |
| *Chairman of the Board*                   |
| *(Principal Executive Officer)*           |
| March 16, 2006                       |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7282

BENJAMIN HUBBARD, Petitioner - Appellant, versusSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-713-6-22AK) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Hubbard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hubbard v. South Carolina , No. CA-98-713-6-22AK(D.S.C. Aug. 10, 1998). We deny the motion to authorize transcripts at the Government’s expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In re ESTATE OF HIGGINS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21I0121. COREY RITTER v. HELEN LOPEZ.

On December 30, 2020, the trial court entered an order in this legitimation

action, which denied Corey Ritter’s emergency motion to remove the custody

evaluator and to strike the custody evaluation report. On January 13, 2021, the trial

court entered a certificate of immediate review, and Ritter filed this application for

interlocutory appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a partymay request interlocutory review only if the

trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review

should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional

requirement. See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2)

(209 SE2d 715) (1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within

the prescribed ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait

until the final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Duke v. State, 306 Ga.

171, 178 (3) (a) (829 SE2d 348) (2019). 

Here, the certificate of immediate review was issued 14 days after entry of the

order on appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application for

interlocutory appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

February 16, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/16/2021
Case 1:11-cv-02342-BNB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02342-BNB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02342-BNB Document 1 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00852-CV

IN RE Abe Ray HERRERA

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CRW2006147

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On December 19, 2022, Appellant Abe Ray Herrera, representing himself, filed a notice of 

appeal. On December 30, 2022, we advised Appellant that the clerk’s record does not contain an 

appealable judgment or order. See Queen v. State, 212 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006, 

no pet.) (citing Glover v. State, No. 12-05-00189-CR, 2005 WL 1538228, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler 

June 30, 2005, no pet.)). We explained that “claims such as [his] would seem more properly 

brought by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.” Queen, 212 S.W.3d at 623 (citing TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.01). But “even if we could interpret his claims as seeking 

extraordinary relief, we lack original jurisdiction over petitions for writ of habeas corpus, which 

must be brought in the court of criminal appeals, district courts, or county courts.” Id. (citing TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by January 
04-22-00852-CV

- 2 -

16, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On January 9, 2023, 

Appellant responded with a copy of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. As previously noted, “we 

lack original jurisdiction over petitions for writ of habeas corpus, which must be brought in the 

court of criminal appeals, district courts, or county courts.” Id. (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.05). Accordingly, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction without 

prejudice to future appeals. 

PER CURIAM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 20, 2021

No. 04-21-00184-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N., ET AL., CHILDREN

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01795

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 The district clerk’s request for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record is 

GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due on or before May 25, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                               
<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>                         
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                        
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                     
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                  6,029
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             115
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,523
<PP&E>                                 37,740
<DEPRECIATION>                         10,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         35,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     621
<BONDS>                                14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             19,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           35,021
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       30,785
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           3,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        26,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    26,148
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           26,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           12.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                           12.94
        

</TABLE>
|   | /s/ Kenneth A. Joyce                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Print      Name: Kenneth A. Joyce                                            |
|   | Title:  Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   | Date:  May      14, 2009                                           |

| * | This      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and      shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act      or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This      certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any      filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,      except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by      reference into any suchfiling. |
|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### FUTCH v. HABIG.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the NetSolve, Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Plan of our report dated April 17, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of NetSolve, Incorporated included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas
August 4, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02344-REB

IRENE GONZALES,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in

accordance with the Order Affirming Commissioner [#17] entered by Judge Robert E.

Blackburn on September 24, 2012, which order is incorporated herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the conclusion of the Commissioner through

the Administrative Law Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is AFFIRMED.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 25th day of September, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02344-REB Document 18 Filed 09/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0405

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NATHAN BRYCE HARDIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie DeLong is 

granted an extension of time to and including December 10, 2021, 

within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on 

appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0405
tnib_ex104.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 


14