alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Jacinta Sit, President of Oxford Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: /s/ Jacinta Sit                                           | 
|Jacinta Sit, President                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | 
|                                                              | 
|April 16, 2008                                                |
#### BRALEY et al. v. CROW et al.

No. 7442.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1950.

Thomas H. McGregor, Shreveport, Louisiana, for appellants.

Campbell & Campbell, Minden, Louisiana, for appellees.

KENNON, Judge.

Alleging that they had been in possession of a described 117 acre tract of land in Webster Parish, Louisiana for many years and that their possession had been recently disturbed by defendants, who had constructed a wire fence across a portion of the property already enclosed by plaintiffs’ fence, plaintiffs filed suit praying that possession be restored to them.

An exception of no cause of action was filed and overruled. After trial, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants appealed.

In this Court, on the day set for argument, plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, setting forth that the defendants had acquiesced in the judgment of the District Court 'by removing 'and demolishing the fence at their own expense.

 If the defendants have acquiesced in the judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. It is therefore ordered that the case be remanded to the District Court; that the case be there re-opened for the taking of testimony as to whether or not there has been an acquiescence in the judgment of the District Court as set forth in plaintiffs’ motion. After the testimony is *921taken and transcript of same filed, the entire record is to be returned to this Court, Adjudication of costs to await the final outcome of the litigation.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0716n.06
Case No. 1 9
- 6482
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES of AMERICA , Plaintiff
- Appell ee ,

v. ALFORD ROBINSON , Defendant
- Appell ant .

_______________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: BATCHELDER , WHITE , and BUSH , Circuit Judge s . ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge
. At his trial on an indict ment as a felon in possession of a firearm , 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) , Alford Robinson stipulated that he was a convicted
felon when he possessed two handgun s. On February 21, 2019, the jury convicted him.
Prior to Robinson’s sentenc ing, the Supreme Court issu ed Rehaif v. United States , 139 S.Ct. 2191 , 2195 (2019) , which interpreted § 922(g) as requiring the prosecution t o prove both
that the defendant knew he possessed a firearm and knew that he belonged to the relevant category of p e ople barred from possessing a firearm , in this case, convicted felons

. Robinson moved the
district court to vacate his conviction on several grounds , all stemming from the fact that the prosecution had not expressly charged or proven that he knew he was a convicted felon. The district court denied the motion, finding that any flaw in the indictment was ultimately harmless, that the evidence at trial (particularly Robinson’s stipulation) was sufficient to prove that
Robinson knew he was a convicted felon, and that the error in the jury instruction was not plain

error
. United States v. Robinson , No. 2:17

- CR

- 20046, 2019 WL 7985173 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 13,No. 19

- 6482, United States v. Robinson

2

2019) ; s ee also , e.g., United States v. Ward , 957 F.3d 691 (6th Cir. 2020) (analyzing virtually identical arguments) ; United St ates v. Conley , 802 F. App ’ x 919 (6th Cir. 2020) (same)

. After carefully reviewing the law, the parties’ arguments, and the record evidence, we conclude that the district court correctly assessed the e vidence at trial and correctly applie d th e law
to th is evidence . The issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court ’ s opinion, we AFFIRM

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02721-BNB

BRUCE W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLAKE DAVIS, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Complex Warden, at the

Federal Correctional Institution Florence,

JULIE WANDS, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Former Warden, at the

Federal Correctional Institution Florence,

THOMAS R. KANE, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the

Feder [sic] Bureau of Prisons, 

NEWTON E. KENDIG, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Medical Director

of the Federal Bureau of Prisons,

MARK KELLAR, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Health Service

Administrator at F.C.I. - Florence,

LISA McDERMOTT, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Assistant Health

Services Administrator at F.C.I. - Florence,

PETER BLUDWORTH, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Associate Warden at

F.C.I. - Florence,

MIKE GOODWIN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief Pharmacist at 

F.C.I. - Florence,

DR. DAVID ALLRED, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Clinical Director of

F.C.I. - Florence,

DR. GEORGE SANTINI, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Staff Physician at

F.C.I. - Florence,

CARI RITTER, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Mid-level Provider, and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, in Their Official Capacity as Employers of the

Following Defendants and Controlling Costady [sic] of Plaintiff,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Early Discovery” (Doc. # 28) is DENIED as premature.

Dated: February 6, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02721-BNB Document 29 Filed 02/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02721-BNB Document 29 Filed 02/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Leonard STIRLING v. INDUSTRIAL LUMBER COMPANY, Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 6, 1934.

For original opinion, see (La. App.) 152 So. 120.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, Industrial Lumber Company, Inc., has, by motion, called our attention to an error in which the judgment handed down herein on January 22, 1934, is inadvertently made to say in the last line of the decree: “Defendant, appellant is to pay the costs in both Courts,” when it was our intention to say that plaintiff, appellant, should bear the costs in both courts.

It is not necessary to grant a rehearing in order to make a correction of this kind.

. The decree is now corrected, and the word “plaintiff” is now substituted for the word “defendant” in the line and place mentioned.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 5, 2021

No. 04-20-00486-CR

Jemadari Chinua WILLIAMS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19-346

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion for leave to file his Supplemental Brief Regarding Insufficiency of the 

State's Evidence is granted.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
##### 



(SYBASE LOGO) EXHIBIT 10.4 February 9, 2004 Marty Beard
SVP, Corporate Development & Marketing
Sybase, Inc.
One Sybase Drive
Dublin, CA 94568
(Delivered by hand) Dear Marty: The year 2004 marks our
20th anniversary and is a critical year for Sybase
growth. We have enjoyed several years of profitability, are cash flow
positive, and in the last six months, expanded our partner base to include
venerable companies like Intel and SAP. The Unwired Enterprise is our driving
strategy for 2004  it is a pivotal part of extending growth in the IT
marketplace. We have exciting new products rolling out from every part of the
company, and the new Unwired Enterprise solution will define the mobile
enterprise category for the industry. We will need everyones help to ensure
that we make the most of our technology leadership and that we continue to
demonstrate a high level of unique value to customers and partners in all of
our programs. Thank you for your contributions last year and ask that all of us keep sight of
the challenges ahead. More than ever, we need to remain focused and dedicated
to delivering growth and shareholder value required for Sybase to remain strong
and competitive. The board has approved our incentive bonus payout and your
bonus payout will be included in your February 15, 2004 paycheck. Let me also inform you of your 2004 Executive Compensation as approved by the
Sybase, Inc. Compensation Committee at the February 4, 2004 meeting.  1.
    
    Cash compensation (effective January 1, 2004)  
    
    Annual base salary: $321,000
(Paid semi-monthly at $13,375)
    
    Incentive bonus target: 60.6% ($194,500)
    
    Total target earnings (TTE): $515,500  Your incentive bonus target will be based on Sybase, inc. overall
company performance as follows:  
    
    50% on Sybase revenue of $817M
    
    50% on Sybase profit before taxes (PBT) of $172




---



##### 



Marty Beard
February 9, 2004
Page 2  Payment of annual incentive bonus will be based on
following:  a)
    
    Sybase revenue:  
    
    70% at 95% of target performance
    
    100% at 100%
    
    3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
    
    no cap  b)
    
    Sybase PBT  
    
    70% at 70% of target performance
    
    100% at 100%
    
    3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
    
    no cap  2.
    
    Long-Term Incentives  (a)
    
    Sybase Stock Option Grant (4-year vest):  
    
    60,000 shares  (b)
    
    Sybase Restricted Stock Grant (3-year cliff vest
with performance acceleration, i.e. from 3-year cliff vest to
2-year cliff vest if Sybase meets its 2004 budgeted revenue):  
    
    8,000 shares at $0.10 per share. I look forward to your contributions this year as we continue our pursuit of
maintaining integrity and credibility with our investors, customers, partners,
and employees. Sincerely,
/S/ JOHN S. CHEN
John S. Chen
Chairman, CEO and President cc:
    
    HR Fileedl
#### CATALINA v. CITY OF MIAMI.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<PAGE>

        Coral Reserves Natural Gas Income Fund 1993 Limited Partnership
               Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                       Three months ended
                                                      Years ended December 31,                              March 31,
                                                      ------------------------                              ---------
                                     1995       1996          1997           1998         1999           1999        2000
                                  --------   ---------     ---------       -------      --------        -------    --------
<S>                               <C>        <C>           <C>             <C>          <C>             <C>        <C>
Earnings
--------
Pre-tax Income                     497,949     979,697       997,534        38,134       565,435         73,870     176,106
Add: Interest Expense                    -      38,018        31,582        42,900        40,682         11,737      11,021
                                  --------   ---------     ---------       -------      --------        -------    --------
                                   497,949   1,017,715     1,029,116        81,034       606,117         85,607     187,127



Fixed Charges
-------------
Interest Expense                         -      38,018        31,582        42,900        40,682         11,737      11,021
                                  --------   ---------     ---------       -------      --------        -------    --------




Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges                        (1)     26.8:1        32.6:1         1.9:1        14.9:1          7.3:1      17.0:1
</TABLE>


(1)  Not applicable since CR93 incurred no interest expense or other fixed
     charges
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan F. Krock hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of PMC-Sierra, Inc. (PMC), that, to my knowledge, this Quarterly Report of PMC on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PMC.



|                   |  |     |  |                             
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Alan F. Krock           
|                   |  |     |  | Alan F. Krock               
|                   |  |     |  | Vice President,             
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and 
|                   |  |     |  | Principal Accounting Officer
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (354 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (35 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (13 KB PDF)
Flows tables (148 KB PDF)
Level tables (121 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (19 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (29 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (632 KB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 11, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 203 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62300-62301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C.,

[[Page 62301]]

as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Cooperative Agreement Applications.
    Date: November 5, 2008.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anne E Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division Of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 
(301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5e5a4c7f515a561151565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82e3e7f1c2ece7ebacecebeaace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Clinical, Epidemiological and Genetics Grant 
Applications.
    Date: November 17, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Anne E Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 20892-9300, 
(301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d1d5c3f0ded5d99eded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5949086b59b909cdb9b9c9ddb929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-24055 Filed 10-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.63

[LETTER HEAD OF PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS REINSURANCE, INC.]

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Mountain Ridge Insurance Company
State Street Bank and Trust Company

                                                               December 12, 2002

         Reference is hereby made to the Revised and Amended Trust Agreements
(the "Trust Agreements") dated as of November 1, 2002 and amended as of the date
hereof by and among each of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("Fire
and Marine") and Mountain Ridge Insurance Company ("Mountain Ridge", and
together with Fire and Marine, the "Beneficiaries"), Platinum Underwriters
Reinsurance, Inc. (the "Grantor") and State Street Bank and Trust Company (the
"Trustee"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Trust Agreements.

         By signature, subject to the conditions set forth below, Fire and
Marine and Mountain Ridge each hereby consents to any acquisition of Qualifying
Assets for cash pursuant to Section 4(b) of each of the Trust Agreements to
which Fire and Marine and Mountain Ridge, respectively, are parties, provided
that any substitution to be made by way of direct exchange of Qualifying Assets
(i.e., instead of by way of a sale for cash, followed by a purchase of
replacement Qualifying Assets for cash) pursuant to Section 4(c) shall be
subject to the prior written approval by the Beneficiaries.

Term

         This Letter Agreement shall take effect as of the date hereof and shall
continue for a period of one year. The Beneficiaries will have the option to
renew this Letter Agreement annually for a period of one year upon written
notice to the Grantor and the Trustee no later than one month prior to the
expiration of its term.

Counterparts

         This Letter Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Governing Law

         This Letter Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance
with, the laws of the state of Maryland.

<PAGE>

                                         PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS
                                         REINSURANCE, INC.

                                         /s/ Michael D. Price
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Name: Michael D. Price
                                         Title: President

Accepted and Agreed to as of this twelfth day of December, 2002

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY

/s/ Thomas A. Bradley
-----------------------------
Name: Thomas A. Bradley
Title: Executive Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer

MOUNTAIN RIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY

/s/ Thomas A. Bradley
-----------------------------
Name: Thomas A. Bradley
Title: Executive Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY

/s/ Craig Both
-----------------------------
Name: Craig Both
Title: Vice President

cc: Alliance Capital Management L.P.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02766-RPM 

EVELYN KING-BURRELL, as personal representative of the 

Estate of Rickey W. Burrell a/k/a Rickey Wayne Burrell, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, 

BRANDON RINNAN, in his individual capacity, 

DARREN CHAMBERLAND, in his individual capacity, and 

DARRYL HUNTSMAN, in his individual capacity, 

Defendants. 

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

____________________________________________________________________________

 Pursuant to the Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice All Claims Against Defendants

Rinnan, Huntsman, and Chamberland [44] filed January 22, 2013, it is

ORDERED that all claims are dismissed with prejudice against Defendants Brandon

Rinnan, Darren Chamberland, and Darryl Huntsman in their individual and official capacities,

each party to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

DATED this 24th day of January, 2013

BY THE COURT: 

s/Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________ 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch 

Case 1:11-cv-02766-RPM Document 47 Filed 01/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### KARHAN v. KARHAN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Johnny Eugene Ray, Jr., Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00068

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27569 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by J ustice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment
of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court ’ s judgment by deleting the assessment of
attorney fees and changing the amount assessed for c ourt c osts to $359.00. As modified, we affirm

the trial court’s judgment

. W e note that the appellant, Johnny Eugene Ray, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability
to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

R ENDERED SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk