alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; B/START Review.
    Date: October 24, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mark Swieter, PhD, Chief, Training and Special 
Projects Review Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
220, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1389, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7baa4efb8af97b9bebff9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e18c92d98e99a18f8889cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-24444 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit10.3 - Bonus Plan Description




Bonus Plan Description


In March 2014, the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”) approved an annual cash incentive plan, pursuant to which certain employees, including the named executive officers specified in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2014 annual meeting, will be eligible to participate in an annual award pool. For 2014, the pool will initially be funded at a range of $1.0 million to a 100% target level of $7.2 million based upon the Company’s achievement of certain financial goals related to Adjusted EBITDA for the year ending December 31, 2014. The target level of funding was determined by the Compensation Committee based on the sum of the target bonus amounts that are included in the employment agreements or offer letters that the Company has with the employees who are eligible to participate in the plan, including the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee will have the discretion to increase the funding for the award pool up to a maximum of 137% of the target level, or $9.84 million, should the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA targets be exceeded. The Compensation Committee also will have the discretion to adjust or make additional cash incentive awards under the plan after taking into consideration the achievement of the Company's financial goals and other factors that the committee deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, the named executive officer’s contributions to the Company's performance during 2014, and the named executive officer’s annual performance review conducted by the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, which will assess, among other things, the named executive officer’s initiative, teamwork and management and communications skills. With respect to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee will have the discretion to adjust the cash incentive awards, if any, to be paid to these named executive officers based on the committee’s annual assessment of these executives, which will be conducted without the input of the executive that is the subject of such assessment.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002











I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.








Dated: August 16, 2010


/s/  Leonard A. RosenbaumLeonard A. Rosenbaum(Principal Executive Officer)
[No. 34560.

*En Banc.*

October 23, 1958.]

#### Charles A. Reynolds, *Appellant,*v. Charles Richardson *et al., Respondents.**1*

*Livesey, Kingsbury & Livesey,*for- appellant.

*Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann,*for respondents.

1

 Reported in 330 P. (2d) 1014.

Mallery, J.

This cause of action arose out of an automobile accident in Snohomish county, Washington, on July 3, 1955.

The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to quash the service of summons and complaint, and the plaintiff appeals.

Our question concerns the compliance with RCW 46-.64.040 *[cf.*Rem. Rev. Stat, Vol. 7A, § 6360-129], which provides for substituted service on nonresident motorists using the highways of this state. The pertinent part of the statute reads:

> “. . . Service of such summons or process shall be made by leaving two copies thereof with a fee of two dollars with the secretary of state, or at his office, and *such service shall be sufficient*and valid personal service upon the nonresident, *but only if notice of such service*and a copy of the *83summons or process *is forthwith sent by registered mail, requiring personal delivery, by plaintiff to the defendant*and the defendant’s return receipt and the plaintiff’s affidavit of compliance herewith are appended to the process and entered as a part of the return thereof. However, personal service outside of this state in accordance with the provisions of law relating to personal service of summons outside of this state shall relieve the plaintiff of the duty of mailing a copy of the summons or process by registered mail. ...” (Italics ours.)

At the time of the accident, the respondents were living in Everett, Washington. Subsequently, they left the state and moved to the state of Virginia.

The record shows thát service was made on the secretary of state, and that personal service was made on respondent Charles A. Reynolds in the state of Virginia. It does not show, however, that notice of service on the secretary of state was sent by appellant to the respondents by registered mail or at all.

Personal service on the respondents relieved appellant of the duty to send a copy of the summons and complaint by registered mail, but it did not relieve him of the duty to send the respondents notice of service on the secretary of state. *Smith v. Belmore,*1 F. R. D. 633.

On May 6, 1957, appellant received a copy of respondents’ motion to quash. Hearings were had on this motion on August 16, 1957, and September 13, 1957. Appellant thus had ample notice and opportunity to perfect his service and introduce proof thereof.

Since service was not made as required by law, the trial court did not obtain jurisdiction of the respondents.

The judgment is affirmed.

All Concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATE OF CFO**     I, Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc. (the“Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:(3) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to which this certificateis attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and (4) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.        Dated: March 31, 2006      /s/ Leslye L. Grindle   Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer      
49
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 16, 2021

No. 04

- 19

- 00781

- CV

Ernest BUSTOS

, Appellant

v.

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ET AL.

,

Appellees

From the 408th Judi cial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 16392

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Reb eca C. Martinez, C hief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rod riguez, Justice



### Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing is

GRANTED. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due June 25, 2021.

___________________________ ______ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2021

.

_________________________ __________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 5, 2008*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.116 Property-Casualty Insurance Companies** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02712–REB–KMT

LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SHERIFF TED MINKS, 

MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager,

JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010,

LT. MARTINALLI,

LT. G. GITTIN,

LT. J. LUCAS,

ADMINISTRATIVE SGT. RENFRO,

SGT. TROY BETKA,

SGT. SCOTT HAPP,

SGT. STEVEN WYGANT,

OFFICER KATHRINE FEROE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF CRUMBAKER,

DEPUTY SHERIFF RYAN VIERS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DUSTIN DYELING,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ANTHONY KOTRIS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DONALD SPRINGFIELD,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HOLLEY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES GELEUDE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JASON RICHARDSON,

DEPUTY SHERIFF REID PERRY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF WILLIAM BOHM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ERIK BOUGHAM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HERBERT LONGSHORE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF #1958 (Name Unknown),

COUNSELOR MIKE COLLINS,

COUNSELOR SUPERVISOR DEBRA ELUDO,

CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT,

CLAUDIA VAN BUREN/HSA,

RAYMOND HERR, Responsible Physician,

TRACY HAINES, LPN, and

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 110 Filed 08/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

KATHERINE BECERRA, RN,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Essential Motion” (Doc. No. 104, filed Aug. 6, 2012) is GRANTED. The Clerk of

Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of “CHM Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion

for Leave to Amend Doc. No. 85” (Doc. No. 96, filed July 12, 2012) and “Jefferson County

Sheriff Defendants’ Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend His

Complaint” (Doc. No. 99, filed July 27, 2012). 

Dated: August 14, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 110 Filed 08/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Incentra Solutions, Inc.
      (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas
      P.
      Sweeney III, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 15, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Thomas P. Sweeney IIIThomas
                P. Sweeney IIIChief
                Executive Officer


___________________________________________________________________________


This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6577

LIONELL LEE HARDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF THE GREENSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00369-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lionell Lee Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. David Michael Uberman, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lionell Lee Hardy seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hardy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### WOFFORD v. TATEM PROPERTIES, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro                                 Jennifer Magro Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director

March 30, 2007                                                      Date

----
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 402 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. ADRIAN ABELARDO GARCIA ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including January 30 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court December 22 2023

12/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0402
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              License No.                         Name/address                         Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
019573F...............................  Longron Corporation dba Time      September 18, 2008.
                                         Logistics, 5415 Hilton Avenue,
                                         Temple City, CA 91780.
015847NF..............................  Straightline Logistics, Inc.,     August 14, 2008.
                                         One Cross Island Plaza, Ste.
                                         203-G, Rosedale, NY 11422.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E8-23873 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
M. Quist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Steven M. Quist
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven M. Quist
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 13, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 171

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICKEY MANTLE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mickey Mantle Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mickey 
Mantle Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") of First
National Master Note Trust (the "Trust") for the year ended December 31, 2005,
I, Karlyn Knieriem, Senior Vice President and Treasurer of First National
Funding Corporation as managing member of First National Funding LLC as
transferor and co-registrant, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Trust.

Dated:  March 29, 2006      FIRST NATIONAL MASTER NOTE TRUST

                            By:  First National Funding LLC, as Transferor and
                                 Co-Registrant

                            By:  First National Funding Corporation,
                                 Managing Member

                            By:  /s/ Karlyn Knieriem
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 Karlyn Knieriem, Senior Vice President
                                 and Treasurer