alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

August 12, 1999

The Board of Directors
Spalding Holdings Corporation
Chicopee, Massachusetts

     We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Spalding Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries (the
"Company") for the periods ended July 3, 1999 and June 30, 1998, as indicated in
our report dated August 6, 1999; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on the information.

     We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-14569 on Form S-8 of
Spalding Holdings Corporation.

     We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

                                          DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

                                       24
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John S. Chen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004
/s/ JOHN S. CHENJohn S. Chen
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
                                          Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                   (In millions except ratio data)

                                                               Years Ended
                                          ----------------------------------------------------
                                          Dec. 27,   Dec. 28,   Dec. 29,   Dec. 30,   Dec. 25,
                                            2003       2002       2001       2000       1999
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before taxes                        $728.7     $620.3     $518.3     $447.5     $331.7

One-third of rents                           20.2       17.1       13.5       11.1       11.7
Interest expense                             29.3        0.3        0.9        0.7        1.4
Equity loss from affiliates
                                              5.8        4.8        1.8         --         --
                                           ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
   Earnings                                $784.0     $642.5     $534.5     $459.3     $344.8
                                           ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
One-third of rents                         $ 20.2     $ 17.1     $ 13.5     $ 11.1       11.7

Interest expense                             29.3        0.3        0.9        0.7        1.4
                                           ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
   Fixed charges                           $ 49.5     $ 17.4     $ 14.4     $ 11.8     $ 13.1
                                           ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges/(1)/      15.8       36.9       37.1       38.9       26.3
                                           ======     ======     ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>

/(1)/ The ratio was calculated by dividing the sum of the fixed charges into the
     sum of the earnings and fixed charges. In calculating this ratio, earnings
     include income before income taxes and before fixed charges. Fixed charges
     include interest expense and one-third of all rent expense (considered
     representative of the interest factor).
#### Ex parte Cecil STEMBRIDGE.

No. 44762.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 20, 1971.

Anderson & Farr by Henry J. Anderson, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the trial court refused to set bond by order dated September 7, 1971.

Applicant seeks bail pending appeal from revocation of a ten year probated sentence for the offense of burglary. Testimony was offered at the hearing by applicant’s wife that a $7,500 bond could be made or possibly a $10,000 bond, but that would be the maximum.

Since this appeal has been received by this court, the trial court set bail at $20,-000, on October 7, 1971, as reflected by supplemental transcript filed in this court on October 11, 1971.

In Ex parte Morgan, 461 S.W.2d 406, where bond had been set at $15,000 in each of two cases by the trial court after a ha-beas corpus proceeding, this court said:

> “There is nothing in the record before us to show that appellant has made any effort to furnish bail in the reduced amount fixed by the court. While there was testimony at the habeas hearing by the appellant that he could ‘possibly’ make ‘$5,000.00 per case,’ there is no showing that he made any effort to make bail in the two cases in the amount fixed by the court.”

This court has consistently held where bail is reduced upon habeas corpus hearing, before complaint can be heard on appeal as to the amount fixed, the accused must show that he has made an effort to furnish bail in that amount. Morgan, supra.; Ex parte Jones, 449 S.W.2d 59; Ex parte Toppings, 422 S.W.2d 459; Ex parte Vernon, 397 S.W.2d 224; Ex parte Rae, 403 S.W.2d 416; Ex parte Gillmore, 369 S.W.2d 356.

Absent a showing by applicant that an effort has been made to furnish bail in the amount fixed by the trial court, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in fixing bail at $20,000 and that same is excessive.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                      | /s/      Wang Shu                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date:    November      16, 2009 | Wang      ShuChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Kim Ignatius, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TeliaSonera AB;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|April 19, 2004 |  | By:    |  | /s/KIM IGNATIUS        
|-------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|               |  | Name:  |  | Kim Ignatius           
|               |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
225 La. 607

#### JEFFERSON 7TH WARD SOCIAL CLUB v. GREVEMBERG et al.

No. 41365.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1954.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1954.

John E. Fleury, Gretna, for plaintiffs-appellarits.

Elven E. Ponder, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a preliminary injunction.

The relator, allegedly a social club incorporated as a non-profit corporation under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 12:101 to 12:155 for the purpose of fostering social and athletic functions and contests; to stage television, boxing and radio programs and contests; and to engage in other incidental activities, sought an injunction to prohibit the respondents from raiding relator’s clubhouse located at 407 Jefferson Highway and from arresting its members or interfering with the use of its property and equipment. A- rule was issued to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted which, after hearing, was discharged by the lower court. It appears from the record that several members of the Club were engaged in a game of poker when some of the officials raided the place and preferred charges against the officers and certain members of the Club charging them with being engaged in and assisting in the business of gambling.

The respondents moved in this court for a remand of the case in order to show that the case has become moot because the relator is no longer occupying the premises at 407 Jefferson Highway and that same is now leased by other parties who are operating it as a cafeteria. Counsel for the relator concedes this fact and states that therefore there is no necessity for a remand of the case. However, counsel contends that the relator is entitled to an injunction, enjoining the officers from raiding or interfering with the relator in the event they establish another clubhouse, under his prayer for general relief.

It does not appear from the record that the relator is now operating a club at another place and consequently the relief sought would be premature. Cooley v. *778Meridian Lumber Co., 195 La. 631, 197 So. 255. Under the circumstances it is unnecessary for us to pass on the question of whether the relator and its members were engaged in the business of gambling and whatever business they may become engaged in in the future we are unable to determine. In other words, we cannot anticipate that the business they may engage in in the future would be legal or illegal. The only question properly presented became moot when the relator ceased to occupy the premises. It is a well settled policy of this court that we will not decide moot questions. General Motors Truck Co. of Louisiana v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co., 175 La. 892, 144 So. 608; State v. Hayes, 199 La. 269, 5 So.2d 768; Pellegrin v. City of Gretna, 222 La. 527, 62 So.2d 824 and cases cited therein.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed at the cost of the relator.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00280

- CV

I N RE K ILLICK A EROSPACE L IMITED

, K ILLICK A EROSPACE

, LLC

, Relator §

§

§

§

§

§ Original Proceeding

236th District Court of Tarrant County,

Texas

Trial Court No. 236

- 315925

- 20

December 23, 2020

Memorandum Op in ion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and holds

that the petition should be conditionally granted. Accordingly, we conditionally grant

the writ of mandamus and direct the trial cour t to vacat e its order denying the Killick

Parties ’ motion to dismiss , and w e direct th e trial court to enter an order dismissing

the claims brought against the Killick Parties

. Ou r wr it will iss ue on ly if the t rial cour t

f ails to comply

.It is further order ed that Real Party in Interest Bombardier Inc. and Learjet,

Inc. shall pay all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    SUNIL WADHWANI                                                                      
|Sunil Wadhwani Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director



May 10, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERNEST RECE DALE BURBAGE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 204 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
#### BURKHALTER v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24645]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 11464 and 11465]

Puerto Rico Disaster Number PR-00003

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-1798-DR), 
dated 10/01/2008.
    Incident: Severe storms and flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/21/2008 and continuing through 10/03/2008.
    Effective Date: 10/03/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/01/2008.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/01/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, dated 10/01/2008 is 
hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning 09/21/2008 and continuing through 10/03/2008.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-24645 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
#### STATE ex rel. WINCHSCH v. HALL.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.A

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3), and related Prospectus of Phillips Petroleum
Company for the registration of $5,000,000,000 of its securities (as defined in
the Registration Statement) and to the incorporation by reference therein of our
report dated March 22, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Phillips Petroleum Company included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

                                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 7, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In millions, except ratio data)
 Years EndedDec. 29,
    
    Dec. 30,
    
    Dec. 31,
    
    Dec. 25,
    
    Dec. 27,2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003Income before taxes
    
    $
    1,503.3
    
    
    $
    1,011.8
    
    
    $
    952.9
    
    
    $
    806.3
    
    
    $
    728.7One-third of rents
    
    
    20.6
    
    
    
    20.0
    
    
    
    18.1
    
    
    
    16.9
    
    
    
    20.2Interest expense
    
    
    134.2
    
    
    
    95.8
    
    
    
    73.9
    
    
    
    69.1
    
    
    
    29.3Equity loss from affiliates
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    3.6
    
    
    
    5.0
    
    
    
    5.8Earnings
    
    $
    1,659.3
    
    
    $
    1,129.6
    
    
    $
    1,048.5
    
    
    $
    897.3
    
    
    $
    784.0One-third of rents
    
    $
    20.6
    
    
    $
    20.0
    
    
    $
    18.1
    
    
    $
    16.9
    
    
    $
    20.2Interest expense
    
    
    134.2
    
    
    
    95.8
    
    
    
    73.9
    
    
    
    69.1
    
    
    
    29.3Fixed charges
    
    $
    154.8
    
    
    $
    115.8
    
    
    $
    92.0
    
    
    $
    86.0
    
    
    $
    49.5Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)
    
    
    10.7
    
    
    
    9.8
    
    
    
    11.4
    
    
    
    10.4
    
    
    
    15.8
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio was calculated by dividing the sum of the fixed charges into the sum of
the earnings and fixed charges. In calculating this ratio, earnings include income before
income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense and one-third of all
rent expense (considered representative of the interest factor).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LancerCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Freitas, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 12, 2005 | /s/ MARK L.  FREITAS     |   |
|-----------------|--------------------------|--------|
|            | Mark L. Freitas,         |   |
|            | Chief Financial  Officer |   |

 

----