alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

I, J. Russell Porter, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the “Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 31, 2006
**Exhibit 21**

 

**Belrose Capital Fund LLC Subsidiaries (as of December 31, 2007)**

 
| **Name**                      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                          |       |                                        |
| Bel  Larimer LLC              |       | Delaware                                    |
|                          |       |                                        |
| Bel  Marlborough Campus LLC   |       | Delaware                                    |
|                          |       |                                        |
| Belrose  Realty Corporation   |       | Delaware                                    |
|                          |       |                                        |
| Belvorn  Holdings LLC         |       | Delaware                                    |
|                          |       |                                        |
| Deerfield  Property Trust     |       | Maryland                                    |
|                          |       |                                        |
| Katahdin  Property Trust, LLC |       | Delaware                                    |

 

----
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.7

                                  CERTIFICATION

                          Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
                           Series 2002-2 (the "Trust")

I, Patricia M. Garvey, a vice president in charge of the reports of the
servicing function of Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association for the
above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon
         my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, and except as
         disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
         under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement; and

5.       The report disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement, that is included
         in this annual report.


Date:    March 30, 2004


/s/ Patricia M. Garvey
-------------------------------
Name:    Patricia M. Garvey
Title:   Vice President
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of World Information Technology, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Shyng-Jiann Lin, Secretary, Principal Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to World Information Technology, Inc. and will be retained by
World Information Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


July 29, 2004                           /s/ Shyng-Jiann Lin
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Shyng-Jiann Lin
                                        Secretary, Principal Financial Officer
                                        and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

UHF INCORPORATED

CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of UHF Incorporated, (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Ronald C. Schmeiser, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Ronald C. Schmeiser              
|                        |  |     |  | Ronald C. Schmeiser                  
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



- 15 -
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 5, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r 137806 (13) Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices LEONARD ARTHUR STRICKLAND III,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137806 COA: 288136 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $48.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $327.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 5, 2008
Clerk
#### William H. CLONINGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James WOLFE, Defendant-Respondent, and William L. Larson, a/k/a Wilbur L. Larson, Defendant.

No. 9107.

Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri.

Dec. 10, 1971.

Horace S. Haseltine, Haseltine & Springer, Springfield, Harvey B. Cox, Jr., Cox, Cox, Cox, McEnery & Wallace, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.

Amos Wight, Ewing, Ewing, Carter, Wight, Woodfill & Middleton, Nevada, Robert L. Ross, Columbia, for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, in their Third Amended Petition claimed damages against defendants Wolfe and Larson, • as principal and agent, in the respective sums of $50,000 and $10,000. A jury returned a verdict for defendants on the plaintiff-wife’s derivative claim but could not agree upon a verdict on the plaintiff-husband’s cause of action and was, therefore, discharged. The trial court (V.A.M.R. Civil Rule 72.02), in granting defendant Wolfe’s motion for judgment in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict, entered judgment against the plaintiff-husband and in favor of defendant Wolfe. Thereafter, by leave of court, the plaintiff-husband filed a Fourth Amended Petition alleging he had been damaged in the amount of $25,000. Defendant Larson answered this pleading but did not appear in person or by counsel when the claim on the Fourth Amended Petition was court-tried and a $25,000 judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff-husband and against defendant Larson. The only appeal taken in this matter was to this court by the plaintiff-husband from the judgment in favor of defendant Wolfe “which became final when the judgment for [plaintiff-husband] against the other defendant [Larson] became final.” V.A.M.R. Civil Rule 82.06.

Defendant Wolfe, the respondent in the pending appeal, challenges the appellate jurisdiction of this court and, in effect, has moved that the cause be transferred to the Supreme Court because, so he says, the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, ex-*41ceetls the sum of $30,000. V.A.M.S. § 477.040. Respondent asserts that when judgment was rendered in his favor against the plaintiff-husband on the Third Amended Petition, the amount then in dispute was $50,000, which sum exceeds our present appellate jurisdiction, and that plaintiff-husband cannot defeat the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by making a post-judgment reduction in his prayer for damages. Powers v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 262 Mo. 701, 705-706(1), 172 S.W. 1, 2(2). It is unnecessary that we consider this point for it is not apropos. Plaintiff-husband, by not appealing from the judgment in his favor against defendant Larson, has permitted the maximum amount of his possible recovery against respondent, or respondent and defendant Larson, to become fixed at $25,000. Consequently, the amount in dispute upon this appeal does not exceed $30,000, and we have appellate jurisdiction. Joffe v. Beatrice Foods Company, Mo., 335 S.W.2d 34, 35(1); Daniels v. Dillinger, Mo.App., 445 S.W.2d 410, 412(1). Respondent’s motion is overruled and the appeal will be heard in this court upon its merits.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.











/s/ John W. Finke


John W. Finke


President and Chief Executive Officer


May 3, 2011
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60095

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES T. GRUBBS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LLOYD JONES,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CV-238-LN

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James T. Grubbs, #A84404, appeals the dismissal of his civil

rights complaint against the late Sheriff Lloyd C. Jones of

Simpson County, Mississippi. Grubbs moves to join new defendants

and to amend his complaint. Grubbs does not discuss whether the

district court erred by dismissing his complaint pursuant to FED.

R. CIV. P. 25(a) for failure to substitute new defendants within
No. 96-60095

- 2 -

90 days of suggestion of Jones’s death; Grubbs consequently has

failed to brief the relevant issue for appeal. Brinkmann v. 

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). 

This appeal is frivolous. We caution Grubbs that any

additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the

imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Grubbs is further

cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do

not raise arguments that are frivolous.

Finally, Grubbs’s motion to join new defendants is DENIED;

his motion to amend his complaint also is DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. SANCTIONS WARNING

ISSUED. MOTIONS DENIED.
#### WILKINSON v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61809 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–41] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–41 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–01–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
61810 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.031</GPH> 
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61811 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.032</GPH> 
61812 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.033</GPH> 
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61813 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.034</GPH> 
61814 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.035</GPH> 
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 61815 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.036</GPH> 
61816 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–24455 Filed 10–16–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–89] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–89 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC08.037</GPH>
#### The State, ex rel. Alcorn, *v.*Urner, City Aud., et al.

(No. 25541

Decided October 23, 1935.)

*Mr. William Thorndyke,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Ed. F. Alexander,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000766659
<NAME>                        ENERGROUP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          856
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,642
<OTHER-SE>                                    (4,498)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (530)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 19, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.110 U.S.-Chartered Commercial Banks** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH

CARL GENBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN S. PORTER,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 7, 2015.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File his Memorandum Contra Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

for Lack of Prosecution [filed December 31, 2014; docket #168] is granted. The Court will accept

and consider the Plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss, attached to the present motion at

docket #168-2. Defendant may file a reply in support of his motion on or before January 21, 2015.

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 170 Filed 01/07/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1