alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(c)


                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------


         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2002 among HFC Revolving
Corporation, as Depositor, the Master Servicer and Bank One, National
Association, as Trustee, that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Year") and of its performance under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

         2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.


                                       /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
#### BOONE BOX COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. James P. PHILLIPS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1971.

*87Richard I. McIntosh, Woodward, Hob-son & Fulton, Louisville, for appellant.

George H. Logan, Hardy, Logan & Hastings, Louisville, for appellee James P. Phillips.

Thomas R. Emerson, J. Keller Whitaker, Dept, of Labor, Frankfort, for appellee Workmen’s Compensation Bd.

Gemma M. Harding, Dept, of Labor, Louisville, for appellee Special Fund.

C. Dant Kearns, Stites & McElwain, Louisville, for appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

James M. Graves, William P. Swain, Boehl, Stopher, Graves & Deindoerfer, Louisville, for appellee Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.

GARDNER, Commissioner.

James Phillips was awarded workmen’s compensation benefits based on total permanent disability. The Workmen’s Compensation Board determined that his employer, Boone Box Company, Inc., alone was obligated for the compensation. The circuit court affirmed the Board’s award. We affirm.

Phillips sustained an injury to his back on September 30, 1966, when he was knocked down by a tow motor as it turned a corner. He sustained slight re-injuries to his back on February 7, 1969, and July 22, 1969. Boone Box Company had a different insurance carrier at the time of each accident. Special Fund was made a party on the assumption that the 1966 accident aroused into disabling reality a preexisting disease as contemplated by KRS 342.120. The Board dismissed Special Fund as a party when it determined there was no pre-existing disease.

All medical examiners diagnosed Phillips’ condition as spondylolisthesis. The Board properly ruled in accordance with our prior decisions that spondyloisthe-sis is not a disease within the meaning of KRS 342.120 requiring apportionment where there is a pre-existing disease not previously disabling but aroused into disabling reality by the injury or occupational disease. See Young v. Monroe, Ky., 466 S.W.2d 452 (1971), and Klarer of Kentucky, Inc. v. Peters, Ky., 473 S.W.2d 139 (decided November 19, 1971).

There was evidence of sufficient probative value to support the Board’s finding that all of Phillips’ disability stemmed from the accident of September 30, 1966. The finding dispels, therefore, the question of the respective liabilities of the insurance companies.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
#### Paysen *v.*The New York Central Rd. Co.

(No. 25736

Decided January 15, 1936.)

*Messrs. True, Crawford <& True,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Graves <& Duff -,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, 'dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1273 KA 09-00951**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CORNELLIUS L. NESMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered April 30, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a guilty plea of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that the police conducted an illegal inventory search of the vehicle and thus that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress the weapon found during that search. We reject defendant’s contention. “Following a lawful arrest of the driver of an automobile that must then be impounded, the police may conduct an inventory search of the vehicle” pursuant to established police policy ( People v Johnson , 1 NY3d 252, 255). Here, the People met their burden of establishing that the police followed the procedure set forth in the applicable order of the Rochester Police Department in conducting the inventory search ( see People v Wilburn
, 50 AD3d 1617, 1618, lv denied 11 NY3d 742; People v Cooper , 48 AD3d 1055, 1056, lv denied 10 NY3d 861). Also contrary to defendant’s contention, the officers followed the standard procedure in the applicable order in impounding the vehicle upon determining that there was no one available who could legally drive it. We reject defendant’s contention that the applicable order required the officers to locate the registered owner of the vehicle. Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the record establishes that the police prepared a “meaningful inventory list” ( Johnson , 1 NY3d at 256; see Wilburn , 50 AD3d at 1618). We have considered defendant’s remaining**-2- 1273 KA 09-00951** 

contention and conclude that it is without merit.

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Order entered October 29 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01044

- CV

CHANDLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

FIRST SPECIALTY INSU RANCE CORPORATION , ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial Di strict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Dc

- 12

- 06968



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 23, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on October 23, 2013 filed

a s of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00422-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HA MANH DO,

Defendant.

 

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

This criminal action has proceeded to sentencing and a final judgment and

conviction, and the defendant was remanded to the custody of the United States

Marshal at sentencing, or has self-surrendered to the designated facility, as confirmed

by the United States Bureau of Prisons. As a result, all the conditions of an appearance

bond imposed by the court as a pretrial matter to secure the defendant’s release,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), have been satisfied. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the bond in this case is hereby exonerated and the surety or

sureties, if applicable, are released. It is further 

ORDERED that the bail funds or property deposited into the registry of the court

shall hereby be released by the clerk of the court, or a designated deputy, to the surety

or the defendant. 

Dated April 3, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cr-00422-REB Document 237 Filed 04/03/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40719

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LORENZO CRUZ DE LA CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 5:09-CR-333-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lorenzo Cruz de la Cruz has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.

2011). Cruz de la Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for review.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 17, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40719 Document: 00511634361 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/17/2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Family and Youth Services Bureau, ACYF, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice to award supplemental grants.

*CFDA#:*                     93.592.                

*Legislative Authority:*                     Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10401 et seq.)                

*Amount of Award:*                     $145,000.                

*Project Period:*                     September 30, 2008-March 31, 2009.                

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), will award a program expansion supplement to the National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence (NLAEDV), in New York, NY. The additional funds will enable the grantee to continue the provision of technical support through the Family Violence Prevention and Services Discretionary Grant Program. The NLAEDV has provided national-level training and has developed guidelines and training tools that are culturally proficient for services to Latino victims and survivors of domestic violence and their families. The supplemental award will support the dissemination of products and curriculum developed by NLAEDV through training for State Domestic Violence Coalitions and their member programs, presentations at national conferences, targeted education and outreach efforts, and technical assistance.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Marylouise Kelley, Director, Family Violence Prevention and Services Program, 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: 202-401-5756. E-mail:                         *marylouise.kelley@acf.hhs.gov*.                    

Dated: September 29, 2008.

Joan E. Ohl,

Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.

 [FR Doc. E8-23480 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 12, 2009*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.201 SDR Certificates and Treasury Currency** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### ESCAMBIA COUNTY, for the Use of N. P. OLIVER and M. N. Oliver, Doing Business as Bay Construction Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 7, 1935.

John M. Coe, of Pensacola, for plaintiff in error.

E. C. Maxwell, of Pensacola, for defendant in error.

PER, CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the record, briefs, and the arguments of counsel for the respective parties, we find no error in the rulings or judgment of the trial court. Said judgment is accordingly afSrmed.

WHITFIELD, 0. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., . concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The committee serves as a deliberative body to advise the Archivist of the United States, on technical, mission, and service issues related to the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). This includes, but is not limited to, advising and making recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation and use of the ERA system.

*Date of Meeting:*                         November 5-6, 2008.                    

*Time of Meeting:*                         9 a.m.-4 p.m.                    

*Place of Meeting:*                         700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.                    

                        This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives Program at                         *era.program@nara.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

    - Opening Remarks.
    - Approval of Minutes.
    - Committee Updates.
    - Activities Reports.
    - Adjournment.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Adrienne Thomas, Deputy Archivist; (301) 837-1600.

Dated: October 8, 2008.

Patrice Little Murray,

 Alternate Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-24341 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1709 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1709

 To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 
 1998 to provide additional staff and oversight of funds to carry out 
                    the Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2007

  Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Specter, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Carper, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Obama) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 
 1998 to provide additional staff and oversight of funds to carry out 
                    the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Underground Railroad 
Network to Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. HIRING STAFF FOR THE NATIONAL UNDERGROUND RAILROAD NETWORK.

    Section 3 of the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom 
Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 469l-1) is amended by striking subsection (d) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(d) Staff.--The Secretary shall appoint at least 8 full-time 
equivalent staff to assist the Secretary in carrying out duties under 
this Act, including providing oversight of the grant program 
established under section 4.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    The National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act of 1998 
(16 U.S.C. 469l et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 469l-2), by striking subsection 
        (d); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated for each 
fiscal year to carry out this Act $2,500,000.
    ``(b) Allocation.--Of the amounts made available under subsection 
(a)--
            ``(1) $2,000,000 shall be allocated to carry out section 3; 
        and
            ``(2) $500,000 shall be allocated to carry out section 4.
    ``(c) Limitation.--Any amounts made available under this section 
shall be made available only to the Secretary to carry out the 
responsibilities of the Secretary under this Act.
    ``(d) Availability.--Amounts made available under this section 
shall remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by sections 2 and 3 shall take effect at the 
beginning of the next fiscal year after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Gesner José de Oliveira Filho, undersigned Chief Executive  Officer of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo –SABESP (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information  contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              |        |                                          |        |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  |   | July 10, 2008                       |   |
|         |
| By:     |   | /s/ Gesner José de Oliveira Filho |   |
|         |        |                                     |   |
| Name:   |   | Gesner José de Oliveira Filho     |   |
| Title:  |   | Chief Executive Officer                  |   |
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Pieter A Van der Vorst, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sybase, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls
over financial reporting.

|                            |  | 
|--------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2003     |  | 
|/s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORST
|                           
|Pieter A. Van der Vorst    
|Senior Vice President and  
|Chief Financial Officer    

52