alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, NMC Global Corporation, 326 23rd St., Kenner, LA 70062, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of NMC Global Corporation as a commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 1, 2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-1060.

Dated: January 31, 2008.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E8-2401 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
61064 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 15, 2008 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–57] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–5 7 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 15, 2008 / Notices 61065 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN15OC08.035</GPH>
61066 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 15, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN15OC08.036</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 15, 2008 / Notices 61067 

[FR Doc. E8–24404 Filed 10–14–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN15OC08.037</GPH>
Case 1:11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS Document 34 Filed 07/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS Document 34 Filed 07/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02639-MSK-CBS Document 34 Filed 07/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Order entered December 16, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 00249
- CR
AARON LEDELL CELESTINE , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F22
- 00005
- I
O RDER Appellant’s brief is overdue. The brief was originally due August 10, 2022. We subsequently granted appellant three extensions of time to file the brief, on Augu st 11, 2022 , September 16, 2022, and October 19, 2022. Following the third extension on October 19, 2022 , appellant’s brief was due November 10, 2022 . We cautioned counsel that if the brief were not filed by November 10, 2022, we would abate the case for the trial court to hold a hearing and determine why the brief has not been filed. As of the date of this order, appellant’s brief has not been filed.The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been f iled. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appea ls. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curi am). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which

s hall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY
DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
#### DAVIS v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Case 1:11-mc-00095-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-mc-00095-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-mc-00095-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00391-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL CANTER,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This will confirm that, pursuant to Defendant’s Notice of Disposition (Doc 28 - filed

May 17, 2012), a change of plea hearing is set Monday, June 25, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in

Courtroom C-401, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver,

Colorado. Defendant must be present.

The trial preparation conference set June 14, 2012 and the trial set June 18, 2012

are VACATED.

Dated: June 8, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 171 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 171

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2007

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICKEY MANTLE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mickey Mantle Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mickey 
Mantle Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate February 17, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: November 10, 2005, revised March 
      9, 2006Release dates | About
Discontinuance of M3
On March 23, 2006, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System will cease publication of the M3 monetary aggregate.   The Board will also cease publishing the following components:  large-denomination time deposits, repurchase agreements (RPs), and Eurodollars.  The Board will continue to publish institutional money market mutual funds as a memorandum item in this release.
      Measures of large-denomination time deposits will continue to be published 
        by the Board in the Flow of Funds Accounts (Z.1 release) on a quarterly 
        basis and in the H.8 release on a weekly basis (for commercial banks).
      M3 does not appear to convey any additional information about economic 
        activity that is not already embodied in M2 and has not played a role 
        in the monetary policy process for many years. Consequently, the Board 
        judged that the costs of collecting the underlying data and publishing 
        M3 outweigh the benefits.

Statistical releases
Home | 
Economic research and dataAccessibility | 
Contact Us
Last update: March 9, 2006
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Mitchell Gross
--------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTOC.F.R SECTION 240.13a-14(a)**

**(SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)**

I, James W.Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of Ciprico Inc. (“the Company”), certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form10-KSB of Ciprico Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.             TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, is made known to us by others within theCompany, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors:

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated:  December 7, 2006 | Signature: | /s/ James W. Hansen      |   |
|-------------------------------|------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                          |       | James W. Hansen          |
|                          |       | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 1, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00636

- CV

Kevin W. LILES , Bryan K. Harris and Stu art R. White

,

Appellant s / Cross

- Appellees

v.

Maria Isabel Serna CONTRERAS

, Appellee/ Cross

- Appellant

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVT001295 D3 Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he district clerk has filed a notification of late record stating that the clerk’s record has

not be en filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

Accordingly , it is ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the cle rk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fail s to respond within the time provided, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sa id

court on this 1st day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period endingSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive Officer ofHickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 

 
| /s/ John W. Finke                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| John W. Finke                          |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| October 30, 2007                       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. P. Kimble, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 7,
2004



/s/    A. P. KIMBLEA. P. Kimble Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02745-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
#### BOWER v. BOWER.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1856 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1856

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make technical corrections to 
              the new border tunnels and passages offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2007

  Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to make technical corrections to 
              the new border tunnels and passages offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 27 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by redesignating section 554 added by section 551(a) of the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 
109-295; 120 Stat. 1389) (relating to border tunnels and passages) as 
section 555.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for chapter 27 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 554, ``Border tunnels and passages'', and inserting the 
following:

``555. Border tunnels and passages.''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL FORFEITURE.

    Section 982(a)(6)of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``554'' and inserting ``555''.

SEC. 3. DIRECTIVE TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION.

    Section 551(d) of the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 120 Stat. 1390) is 
amended in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) by striking ``554'' and inserting 
``555''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1704 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1704

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2007

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Higher Education Extension Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 
2007'' and inserting ``July 31, 2007''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.
                                 <all>
```