alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Print Name: Anthony V. Cosentino                                       |
| Title:  Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial Officer) |
| Date:  May 13, 2011                                          |

| *  | This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into any such filing. |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 188 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 188

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To revise the short title of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and 
Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act 
                                of 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    Section 1 of the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott 
King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 
(Public Law 109-246) is amended by striking ``and Coretta Scott King'' 
and inserting ``Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. Jordan, 
William C. Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia''.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 4(a), and section 13(a)(1), of 
the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973b(a), 1973k(a)(1)) are 
each amended by striking ``and Coretta Scott King'' and inserting 
``Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. Jordan, William C. 
Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia''.

SEC. 3. CONSTRUCTION.

    Title I of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``Sec. 20.  A reference in this title to the effective date of the 
amendments made by, or the date of the enactment of, the Fannie Lou 
Hamer, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, Cesar E. Chavez, Barbara C. 
Jordan, William C. Velasquez, and Dr. Hector P. Garcia Voting Rights 
Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006 shall be considered to 
refer to, respectively, the effective date of the amendments made by, 
or the date of the enactment of, the Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and 
Coretta Scott

              

King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendments Act of 2006.''.

            Passed the Senate February 15, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
JUDGMENT
No. 04

- 16

- 00460

- CV
Jason CAMPBELL , Appellant/Cross

- Appellee

v. Ben LUONG , Appellee/Cross

- Appellant From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 10868 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION , JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that one

- half of the costs o f appeal are taxed against appellant/cross

appellee, Jason Campbell, and one

- half of the costs of appeal are taxed against appellee/cross

appellant, Ben Luong.
SIGNED July 19, 2017.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
<PAGE>
               MMI Companies, Inc and Subsidiaries
   Exhibit 11 - Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
              (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Three Months Ended
                                           March 31, 
                                          1998       1997
        <S>                               <C>        <C>
        BASIC                                             
        Weighted average shares    
        outstanding.................      18,858     18,741
                                                          
        Earnings per common and                           
         common equivalent        
        share.......................      $  .46     $  .57
                        
        DILUTED                                           
                                                          
        Weighted average shares  
        outstanding................       18,858     18,741
                                                          
        Dilutive effect of stock            
        options using the treasury                             
        stock method...............          573        744
        
        Weighted average number of                    
        common and common equivalent                 
        shares.....................       19,431     19,485

        Earnings per common and                           
        common equivalent share....       $  .45     $  .55

</TABLE>
#### Dave HALL, Appellant, v. ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 4, 1972.

Robert J. Greene, Perry & Greene, Paintsville, for appellant.

Fred G. Francis, Prestonsburg, Martin Glazer, Dept, of Labor, Thomas R. Emerson, Frankfort, Gemma M. Harding, Louisville, for appellees.

NEIKIRK, Judge.

Dave Hall filed an application with the Workmen’s Compensation Board, alleging that he had contracted pneumoconiosis during the course of his employment with the Island Creek Coal Company. The Workmen’s Compensation Board entered an opinion and order dismissing the claim, finding that he did not have pneumoconio-sis. On appeal, the Floyd Circuit Court affirmed the Board. Hall now appeals to this court. We affirm.

Appellant worked for approximately ten years as a bit sharpener inside a building on the outside of the company’s mine. The shop was a small block building, with no windows. Hall testified that the air that circulated into and out of the mine traveled through the shop in which he worked; that the air he breathed had the same characteristics as the air breathed by miners inside the mine; and that he was exposed to dust in sharpening the dust-covered bits that came out of the mine.

The sole issue before this court is whether the Board erred in rejecting the testimony of the majority of the physicians who testified for Hall and in accepting adverse testimony.

In reviewing all the evidence, we find that the Board’s decision was reasonable and proper. It is obvious that the Board found that the testimony of some of the physicians did not carry the quality of proof to persuade the Board to find in appellant’s favor. It is within the province of the Board to determine the quality, character, and substance of the testimony. Here, the Board, as finder of fact, based its determination of the probative value of *891the medical evidence before it on quality, not quantity. Where there is conflicting evidence as to facts, the Board’s findings will not be disturbed. Thompson v. Kentucky Appalachian Industries, Inc., Ky., 451 S.W.2d 655. In Newsome v. Island Creek Coal Company, Ky., 459 S.W.2d 145, we said:

> “ * * * Where relevant and credible evidence from expert witnesses equally qualified to give medical-opinion evidence is in direct conflict, the court, on judicial review of a decision made by the fact finder, cannot substitute its evaluation of such evidence for that of the fact finder (in this instance the board) whose duty it is to evaluate this kind of evidence. * * *”

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.2
 ESPP Plan Description  International
 SYBASE, INC.
1991 AMENDED AND RESTATED
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
(As amended on October 25, 2006)




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



(i)
    
    increase the number of shares reserved for purchase under the Plan;(ii)
    
    increase the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan; or(iii)
    
    modify the requirements as to eligibility for participation in the Plan.




---



##### 



By:
    
    DANIEL R. CARLIts:
    
    Vice President, GeneralCounsel and SecretaryDate:
    
    October 25, 2006




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Fox, Presidentand Chief Operating Officer of we, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                                        The informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Southwest Casino Corporation.
|                        |   | /s/ Thomas E. Fox                                  |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Thomas E. Fox, President and Chief Operating       |
|                   |   | Officer (principal financial officer and principal |
|                   |   | accounting officer)                                |
|                   |   |                                               |
|                   |   |                                               |
|                   |   |                                               |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |   |                                               |
| March 21, 2007         |   |                                               |

 

----
EX-10.01



 Exhibit 10.01 

AGREEMENT 
 This Agreement
(the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of May 7, 2014 between Virco Mfg. Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and
                    (“Resigning Director”). 

A. Resigning Director has tendered his resignation as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
effective May 7, 2014. 
 B. In connection with such resignation, the Company desires to provide Resigning Director with
continuing coverage under the Company’s D&O policy for the period he was a member of the Board to the extent available on the terms set forth herein 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

1. For a period of five (5) years from the date hereof (the “Term”), to the extent that the Company maintains an insurance
policy or policies providing liability insurance for directors and officers of the Company, Resigning Director shall be covered by such policy or policies in accordance with its or their terms to the maximum extent of the coverage available under
such policy or policies. 
 2. During the Term, the Company will use commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain its existing liability
insurance policy for directors and officers or a similar policy or policies with substantially the same coverage and limits as the existing liability policy; provided, however, the Company shall not be required to maintain such insurance at premiums
in excess of 125% of the aggregate annual amount paid by the Company for the last annual premium year prior to the date hereof. 
 3. This
Agreement shall be governed and construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware without reference to any conflict of law or choice of law principles of such state that might apply the law of another jurisdiction.

 4. No modification to any provision contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon any party unless made in writing and signed by both
parties. 
 5. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable for any reason, the remaining parts of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. 
 6. Each party has fully considered this Agreement. Each party acknowledges that no agreements other than
as set forth in this Agreement have been made to induce this Agreement. 
 7. In the event that either party should bring any action to
enforce any term of this Agreement, the party who does not prevail in any such action shall pay all the reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by the other party because of the action. 

8. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute
one and the same agreement. 








									
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:	 		 		 	
				
	“Company”	 		 		 	
				
	Virco Mfg. Corporation, a Delaware corporation	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	Date: May 7, 2014	 	
	Name:	 	Robert A. Virtue	 		 		 	
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	 		 		 	
				
	“Resigning Director”	 		 		 	
				
	[Typed Name]	 		 		 	
				
	  
	 		 	Date: May 7, 2014
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Uni-Pixel, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ReedJ. Killion, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

·              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

·              Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 6, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ Reed J. Killion                                        |
|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |               |   |   | Reed J. Killion, President and Principal Executive Officer |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Uni-Pixel, Inc. andwill be retained by Uni-Pixel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.*

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. (the
Registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: April 23, 2007
    /s/ Peter A. EdisonPeter A. EdisonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-14-00520- CV In re Daniel J. Barre ra ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Filed: September

5, 2014
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0613

JASON DEAN FRANKS,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including February 3, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2021

12/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0613
<TABLE> <S> <C>



   <ARTICLE>                5

   <S>                            <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
   <PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-2000
   <PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-2000
   <CASH>                             777,553
   <SECURITIES>                       297,000
   <RECEIVABLES>                    1,285,093
   <ALLOWANCES>                        22,410
   <INVENTORY>                        480,650
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 2,871,280
   <PP&E>                           3,286,518
   <DEPRECIATION>                   1,119,275
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,558,718
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              613,118
   <BONDS>                                  0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
   <PREFERRED>                              0
   <COMMON>                            29,268
   <OTHER-SE>                       3,942,416
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,558,718
   <SALES>                          1,775,430
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,775,430
   <CGS>                            1,203,911
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,203,911
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   468,054
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  17,972
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                     99,371
   <INCOME-TAX>                        23,252
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
   <DISCONTINUED>                           0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
   <CHANGES>                                0
   <NET-INCOME>                        76,119
   <EPS-BASIC>                          .03
   <EPS-DILUTED>                          .02


</TABLE>
#### Powell *v.*Rogers, Appellant.

Argued Jan. 21, 1915.

March 8, 1915:

Appeal, No. 321, Jan. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1912, No. 4294, M. L. D., for plaintiff for want of an affidavit of defense, in the case of Alfred £j. Powell v. Calvin W. Rogers, Owner or Reputed Owner, and Josephine L. Kennedy, Real Owner. Before Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Mosohzisker and. Frazer, JJ.

Affirmed.

. *Edward Hopkins on, Jr.,*and *Abraham M. Beitler,*with them *A. 8. Ashbridge, Jr.,*for appellant.

*John Mahn Thissell,*with him *J. Quincy Hunsicher*and *J. Quincy Hunsicher, Jr.,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

This appeal involves precisely the same questions as those raised in the appeal in Atlantic Terra Cotta Company v. Carson, 248 Pa. 417. That decision necessarily determines this appeal.

The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
##### 



TRIPLE-S MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 Triple-S Management Corporation
  Exhibit A
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF
  /s/ Luis A. Clavell-Rodríguez, MDLuis A. Clavell-Rodríguez, MD




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE FIFTH OF THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 RESOLVED
  1. Voting Rights. provided that Attachments B C
 2. Dividends
 3. Conversion Attachment B
 4. Anti-Dilution Rights Attachment C




---



##### 



ATTACHMENT B
 CONVERSION RIGHTS
Class A Common Stock
 Certain Definitions. Attachment B
 Board of Directors
 Business Day
 Corporation
 IPO
 non-medical heir
 Officer
 outstanding provided
 Person
 Record Date
 Registrar
 share acquisition agreement
 SSS




---



##### 



Subsidiary
 Trading Day
 Transfer Agent
 TSI
 Conversion. Attachment B
 Conversion in the Initial Public Offering.
 Conversion Following the First Anniversary of the IPO.
 Conversion Following the Fifth Anniversary of the IPO
 Conversion Upon Resolution of Potential Claims.
 B-2




---



##### 



Capital Stock Issuable Upon Conversion.
 B-3




---



##### 



ATTACHMEMT C
 ANTI-DILUTION RIGHTS
Class B Common Stock
 1. Definitions. Attachment C Attachment B
 Claimant Share
 Closing Sale Price
 Pre-TSI Issuance Class B Common Stock
 TSI Claimant Shares
 2. Issuance of the Corporations Common Stock
 General
 Triggering Event
 i.
    
    in respect of a claim against the Corporation under any share
acquisition agreement; orii.
    
    to any purported non-medical heir of a former shareholder of
the Corporation or any of its predecessor entities or any of the predecessor
entities of TSI which holders shares of common stock or common stock of any of
the Corporations predecessor entities or the predecessor entities of TSI were
cancelled following the holders death in respect of any purported right of
such heir to receive, by way of testate or intestate transfer or otherwise, the
shares of common stock or such common stock owned by such shareholder at the time of his or her death.
 Anti-Dilution Formula




---



##### 



DR
    
    =
    
    (CAO + X)(CAO + Y)
       3. Issuance of TSI Common Stock
 General
 Triggering Event
 TSI Anti Dilution Formula
 X
    
    =
    
    OA (MC  VA)OB (VA  VO)
 C-2




---



##### 



4. Issuance of Shares
 Issuance of Shares of Class B Common Stock
 Settlement of Fractional Shares. Attachment C
 C-3




---



##### 



5. Limitation of Anti-Dilution Rights Attachment C,
 6. Termination of Anti-Dilution Rights Attachment C
 C-4