alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 172 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 172

   To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-
                       operation and Development.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

                            January 26, 2007

  Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-
                       operation and Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Exit the OECD Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-
              OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
expended to fund activities or projects undertaken by the Organisation 
for Economic Co-operation and Development.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1494 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1494

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the special 
   diabetes programs for Type I diabetes and Indians under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2007

  Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Baucus, Ms. 
   Collins, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Bingaman, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
Schumer, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the special 
   diabetes programs for Type I diabetes and Indians under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAMS FOR TYPE I 
              DIABETES AND INDIANS.

    (a) Special Diabetes Programs for Type I Diabetes.--Section 
330B(b)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254c-2(b)(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 
                through 2013.''.
    (b) Special Diabetes Programs for Indians.--Section 330C(c)(2) of 
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254c-3(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 
                through 2013.''.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 18, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00742

- CR

Ramon Chavez

- Calderon, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES G OODW IN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Beca use

appellant is indige nt and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02706-BNB

THARRON DENNIS BROWN,

Applicant,

v.

J.W. WANDS, Warden FCI-Florence, 

 Respondent.

ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed on October 18, 2011, in this case and

pursuant to Redmon v. Wiley, 550 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has

determined that a limited Preliminary Response is appropriate. Respondent is directed

pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States

District Courts to file a Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative

defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies. If Respondent does not intend to

raise this affirmative defense, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the

Preliminary Response. Respondent may not file a dispositive motion as a Preliminary

Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to

this Order.

 In support of the Preliminary Response, Respondent should attach as exhibits

copies of any administrative grievances Applicant has filed raising the issues asserted in

Case 1:11-cv-02706-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

the Application, as well as any responses to those grievances. Applicant may reply to

the Preliminary Response and provide any information that might be relevant to his

efforts to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order

Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the

Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative

defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of

that decision in the Preliminary Response.

DATED October 31, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02706-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.40.2


                                March 22, 2000

Imperial Bank
5330 Carillon Point
Kirkland, Washington 98033

          Re:  Assumption of Warrant
               ---------------------

To Whom It May Concern:

          This letter will serve to inform you that as of March 7, 2000 (the
"Closing Date"), Stamps.com Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Stamps"), assumed the
obligations of iShip.com, Inc. ("iShip") under that certain Warrant Agreement,
dated August 20, 1999, between Imperial Bank and iShip and all other related
agreements evidencing the option to purchase 10,000 shares of the common stock
of iShip for $2.50 per share (the "Warrant"), subject to the modifications and
amendments to the Warrant set forth herein.  The Warrant shall continue and
remain subject to the same terms and conditions after the Closing Date as were
applicable to such Warrant immediately prior to the Closing Date; provided,
however, that the entire Warrant shall be exercisable for 2,255 shares of Stamps
common stock ("Stamps Common Stock"), at a price of $11.0885 per share of Stamps
Common Stock.  From and after the date hereof, the Warrant shall be exercisable
only for shares of Stamps Common Stock upon the terms and conditions set forth
herein.

                                                STAMPS.COM INC.


                                                 /s/ Michael A. Zuercher
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Name: Michael A. Zuercher
                                                Title: Senior Director,
                                                Legal Affairs and Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice of order to show cause (Order 2008-10-9); Docket DOT-OST-2008-0114.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Grand Canyon Airlines, Inc., fit, willing, and able, and transferring to it the certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail reissued to Scenic Airlines, Inc., by Order 2005-5-10.

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than October 23, 2008.

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2008-0114 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

Dated: October 9, 2008.

Robert S. Goldner,

Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. E8-24576 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9x-P
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 NORTHERN POWER SYSTEMS CORP. (INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA) THIS CERTIFIES
THAT * SPECIMEN * CUSIP: 66561Y107 ISIN: CA66561Y1079 **9,000,000*************9,000,000*************9,000,000*************9,000,000*************9,000,000****** NUMBER CERT.9999 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE VOTING COMMON SHARES IN THE CAPITAL OF is
the registered owner of * NINE MILLION AND 00/100 * transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the registered holder in person or by duly authorized Attorney on surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid
until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar of the Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers. DATED: JANUARY 01, 2009 COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED Equity Financial Trust Company Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Transfer Agent and Registrar AUTHORIZED OFFICER The Shares represented by this Certificate are transferable at the offices of Equity
Financial Trust Company, Toronto, Ontario, and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Elliot Mark Troy C. Patton President & Chief Executive Officer Vice President & General Counsel The Shares represented by this Certificate are transferable at
the offices of Equity Financial Trust Company, Toronto, Ontario, and Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE VOIR LES INSTRUCTIONS DE SECURITE AU VERSO 4762193 By 







 




 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto (PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER OF
TRANSFEREE)(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said Stock on the Books of the within
named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises Dated: Signature: NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR. WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT. OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. AND MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A SCHEDULE 1 CANADIAN CHARTERED BANK OR AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM.Guaranteed by:. 999999 TIR5405 ACCT9999
CERT.9999 There are special rights or restrictions attached to these shares and a copy of the full text thereof is obtainable from the registered office of the company on demand and without charge. RESTRICTIONS SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS –
INSTRUCTIONS DE SECURITE This is watermarked paper do not accept without noting watermark. Hold to light to verify watermark. Papier filigrane ne pas accepter sans verifier la presence du filigrane pour ce faire placer a la lumiere
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1455. SAMUEL ANKRAH v. DOREEN LAWRENCE.

The application for discretionary appeal having been improvidently granted,

this appeal is dismissed.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 23, 2020

10/23/2020
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Southwest Casino Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Thomas E. Fox, Chief Financial Officer of we, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The informationin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Southwest Casino Corporation.

 

 
|                   |  /s/  Thomas E. Fox                            |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Thomas E. Fox, President and Chief  Financial       |
|                   | Officer (principal financial officer and  principal |
|                   | accounting officer)                                 |
|                   |                                                |
|                   |                                                |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |                                                |
| March 31, 2006    |                                                |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME 6-30-98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         748,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,334,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                    90,238
<INVENTORY>                                  2,723,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,075,168
<PP&E>                                       4,703,097
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,119,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,641,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,572,391
<BONDS>                                      2,844,903
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,000,217
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,693,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,641,948
<SALES>                                     12,283,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,283,064
<CGS>                                        7,083,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,083,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                921,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                   256,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            664,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company,

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company, 

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company,

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a New

Jersey insurance company,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order

[docket no. 86, filed October 24, 2012] (the “Motion”).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the Scheduling Order is amended as

follows:

Expert Witness Disclosures:

The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing

counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)

on or before February 15, 2013;

The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide

opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(2) on or before March 30, 2013;

Fact Discovery Cut-off: January 30, 2013;

Dispositive Motion Deadline: April 30, 2013.

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 88 Filed 10/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED that the Pretrial Conference set for March 28, 2013, is vacated and

reset to July 9, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United

States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The proposed Pretrial Order,

submitted pursuant to District of Colorado ECF Procedures V.5.1, is due on or before July 2,

2013. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States

Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.

DATED: October 26, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 88 Filed 10/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: April 11, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02766-RPM

RICKEY BURRELL, Mari A. Newman

Tffany J. Drahota

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, Peter R. Morales

BRANDON RINNAN, in his individual capacity, L. Douglas Jawell

DARREN CHAMBERLAND, in his individual capacity, and 

DARRYL HUNTSMAN, in his individual capacity, 

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motion to File Amended Complaint

10:00 a.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks and comments regarding the proposed amended complaint.

Statements by Ms. Newman.

Court states cases and incidents not relevant to responses to medical emergencies regarding

excessive force with respect to the Aurora Police department will not be permitted.

Statements by Mr. Morales.

Further statements regarding discovery Ms. Newman.

Further statements by Mr. Morales.

ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [12],

is granted with respect to filing an amended complaint and denied with respect to

the tendered amended complaint [13-1].

Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint by May 4, 2012.

Defendant shall respond as discussed on record.

10:20 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 20 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02766-RPM Document 15 Filed 04/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
178 La. 91

#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF RUSTON v. BUNCH et al.

No. 32479.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 30, 1933.

Sholars & Gunby, of Monroe, and Tobin R. Hodge, of Rayville, for appellants.

Redmond & Thompson, of Monroe, for ap-pellee.

ST. PAUL, Justice.

The appellee moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the copy of the judgment appealed from in the transcript of the record filed in this court is not a true copy of, and does not conform with, the original judgment rendered by the court helow and on file and of record in the lower court.

Whereupon the clerk of the lower court, who had confected said transcript, appeared before this court admitting that, through inadvertence and oversight, there occurred in the copy of the judgment sent to this court an error and omission as complained of by the appellee'; and he asked and obtained from this court an order permitting and directing him to correct said transcript so as to conform with the original record on file in his office.

And thereupon the error was corrected and the omission supplied.

As the error and omission complained of *842was not imputable to the appellant but solely to the inadvertence and oversight of the clerk, and as said error and omission have now been corrected and supplied, the same affords no ground for dismissing the appeal. Hayne v. Assessor, 143 La. 697, 79 So. 280, citing C. P. art. 898, Act 229 of 1910, p. 388.

The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.