alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Kim Ignatius, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of TeliaSonera AB;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|April 7, 2005 |  | By: | /s/KIM IGNATIUSKim Ignatius
Chief Financial Officer
|------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
219 *La. 672*

#### GIVENS et al. v. TOWN OF RUSTON.

No. 39533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1951.

Allen B. Guthrie, Ruston, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Walker & Wright, Ruston, for defendant-appellee.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted this suit to recover damages in the sum of $4000 against the Town of Ruston, Louisiana, caused by an alleged trespass upon two lots of ground owned by the petitioners and situated in the town. It is alleged in the petition that the officers, agents, and employees of the town to facilitate the distribution and sale of electric current by the town entered upon petitioners’ property without permission or authority and wantonly and negligently sawed, cut and stripped off the limbs on one side of nine large shade trees located thereon; that as a result of the trespass the value of -the property upon which these trees are situated has been lessened by the sum of $2000, and that one of the petitioners as a result of the trespass suffered and has continued to suffer distress, mental pain, and anguish, for which she should be compensated in the sum of $2000.

As a defense the town pleaded that an emergency had been created by the stonm of September 19, 1947, and that in order to restore current to the citizens and inhabitants of Ruston the limbs which were interfering with certain electric lines had to be removed.

There was judgment for the defendant in the district court dismissing plaintiffs’ suit, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

In brief filed in this court as well as in argument appellants concede that the town is not liable for the limbs which were cut due to the emergency, but they contend that other limbs were removed which it was not necessary to remove because of the emergency, and that they are entitled to damages for the removal of these limbs.

The only proof in the record of the actual amount of damages suffered by these plaintiffs is the testimony of one of them that the property was damaged in the sum of $2000, and that this witness had sustained $2000 damages in “tears”. There is no proof whatsoever of the decreased value of the lots or property because of the alleged act of the defendant.

Due to the nature of the case as disclosed by the record, an award in plaintiffs’ favor could not exceed our minimum jurisdictional amount of $2000, and under such circumstances it is well settled in the jurisprudence of this state that a plaintiff’s allegations as to the amount in dispute will not control in determining the appellate jurisdiction of this court. Bensel v. Kuhl*834man, 154 La. 150, 97 So. 347; Guidry v. Breaux, 158 La. 1002, 105 So. 43; Trahan v. Breaux, 212 La. 459, 32 So.2d 845; Nash v. Curette, 218 La. 789, 51 So.2d 71.

For the reasons assigned, this case is ordered transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, provided that the record shall be filed in that court within 30 days from the date on which this decree shall become final; otherwise the appeal shall be dismissed. The appellants are to pay the costs of this appeal to the Supreme Court; all other costs shall await the final disposi-tionof the case.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1178

KATHRYN L. KERSHNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GALE A. NORTON, Secretary, Department of Interior, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (3:04-cv-00010-WCB) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathryn L. Kershner, Appellant Pro Se. Sherri Evans Harris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C., Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kathryn L. Kershner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her claims of discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701- 796 (1999). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 24, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on January 26, 2006. Because Kershner failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1856 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1856


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2007

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to make technical corrections to 
              the new border tunnels and passages offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 27 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by redesignating section 554 added by section 551(a) of the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 
109-295; 120 Stat. 1389) (relating to border tunnels and passages) as 
section 555.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections for chapter 27 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 554, ``Border tunnels and passages'', and inserting the 
following:

``555. Border tunnels and passages.''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL FORFEITURE.

    Section 982(a)(6)of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``554'' and inserting ``555''.

SEC. 3. DIRECTIVE TO THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION.

    Section 551(d) of the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 120 Stat. 1390) is 
amended in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) by striking ``554'' and inserting 
``555''.

            Passed the Senate July 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
Exhibit 32.2

**Certification**

**Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of    Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: May 11, 2007 |   |   | /S/ANDREW R. PERZ       |
|---------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended  October 3, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Anthony J.
Puglisi, Vice President-Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  November 12, 2004


/s/ Anthony J. Puglisi
----------------------
Anthony J. Puglisi,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

NOTE: A signed original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Richard LAMB v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### Showers *v.*The Prudential Ins. Co. of America.

(No. 25779

Decided January 22, 1936.)

*Mr. Elmer McClain,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. G. V. Fromme*and *Mr. Davis Harrison,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

609 KA 16-02042 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL J. BLARR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

EVAN LUMLEY, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JULIE BENDER FISKE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, J.), rendered January 13, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of scheme to defraud in the first degree (two counts) and one count each of grand larceny in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in People v Blarr ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Apr. 28, 2017]).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52048-52049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12279 and <greek-i>12280]


Iowa Disaster Number IA-00024

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated 08/14/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2010 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 08/16/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/13/2010.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/16/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

[[Page 52049]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Iowa, dated 08/14/2010 is hereby amended 
to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:
Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Jasper, 
Mahaska, Polk.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only): Iowa, Keokuk, 
Poweshiek, Wapello.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Lisa Lopez-Suarez,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-20965 Filed 8-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Cross Timbers Royalty
Trust (the Trust) and Cross Timbers Oil Company (the Company) of our report
dated March 8, 2000 included in the Trust's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999, our report dated March 17, 2000 included in the Company's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, and to all references to our
firm included in this Registration Statement.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas

October 5, 2000
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (i) Form S-8(No. 333-118339) pertaining to the Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan for theregistration of 868,992 shares of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.’s common stock, (ii) Form S-8 (No.333-128533) pertaining to the Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan for theregistration of 250,000 shares of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.’s common stock, (iii) Form S-8 (No.333-141469) pertaining to the Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan for theregistration of 500,000 shares of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.’s common stock, (iv) Post-EffectiveAmendment No. 5 on Form S-3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-112386) pertaining tothe registration of 653,331 shares of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.’s common stock, and (v) AmendmentNo. 1 to Form S-3 (No. 333-124672) pertaining to the registration of 1,591,000 shares of BakersFootwear Group, Inc.’s common stock of our report dated April 19, 2007, with respect to thefinancial statements of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended February 3, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSt. Louis, Missouri
#### PEELER v. DUVAL COUNTY.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VINTON A. GRAHAM

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2100

[ February 11, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline C. Shepherd

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502005CF002140AXXXMB

.

Vinton A. Graham, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 99(c)	

 

 

 

 

 

 

	Certificate as to Compliance
 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 7, 2001 among HFC Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, the Master Servicer and 

J.P.Morgan Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as Bank One, National Association), as Trustee, that:

	1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through December 31, 2003 (the "Year") and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

	2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 25th day of March, 2004.                              

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith		
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer

 

HEL 2001-2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HECTOR KALUAKINI,

 Appellant,

v.

ROBERTO CONTRERAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-09-00317-CV

Appeal from the

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2009-1291)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to dismissthis appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.

P. 42.1(a)(2) because the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and have agreed that the

appeal should be dismissed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Costs of appeal will be

paid by the party incurring the same, according to the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(d).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

May 19, 2010

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
#### Booksbaum *v.*Cousins.

(No. 25676

Decided December 18, 1935.)

*Mr. Joseph A. Bayer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Waters, Andress, Wise, Roetsel $ Maxon*and *Messrs. Henkel <& Qongwer,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
Exhibit
        32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Marla Andre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
        of
        her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
        to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
 By:
                  /s/ Marla
                  AndreMarla Andre
                  Chief Financial Officer
                  March
                        28, 2007
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-PO-00149-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. MARK L. HALPER,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

Counsel for the Defendant contacted the Magistrate Judge’s office on behalf of the

Defendant and requested that the Arraignment scheduled for January 3, 2012 be moved to January

4th or 5th to assist the Defendant in scheduling his return flight to Colorado, therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Arraignment scheduled for January 3, 2012 at 3:00

p.m. be VACATED and RESCHEDULED for January 4, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.

DATED: December 14, 2011. 

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge