alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

          Dated:  November 10, 2006          /S/ VICTOR INSETTA
                ---------------------      ---------------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

June 17, 2009 

137749 

RICHARD R. ROBERTS and STACEY D. 

ROBERTS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 SC: 137749 

v COA: 275458 

Leelanau CC: 05-007063-CK 

ROBERT L. SAFFELL and JOANNE O. 

SAFFELL, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On May 13, 2009, this Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the August 21, 2008, judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs 

unknowingly purchased a termite-infested house from defendants. Under the Seller 

Disclosure Act (SDA), MCL 565.951 et seq., defendants were required to prepare a 

Seller’s Disclosure Statement (SDS) regarding “the condition and information concerning 

the property, known by [sellers.]” MCL 565.957(1). In response to the question 

concerning whether the house had a “history of infestation . . . (termites, carpenter ants, 

etc.),” defendants, “based on [their] knowledge at the signing of this document,” 

answered “no” on the SDS. Id. Once plaintiffs subsequently discovered a termite 

problem, they initiated a claim for innocent misrepresentation, which requires a showing 

that defendants: (1) made a false statement in a transaction with plaintiff, (2) without 

knowledge of that statement’s falsity, (3) which statement actually deceived plaintiffs, 

and (4) on which plaintiffs detrimentally relied, with the benefit inuring to defendants. 

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v Black, 412 Mich 99, 116 (1981). However, the 

SDA provides that a seller is “not liable for any error, inaccuracy, or omission in any 

information delivered pursuant to this act if the error, inaccuracy, or omission was not 

within the personal knowledge of the transferor . . . .” MCL 565.955(1). Thus, because a 

claim for innocent misrepresentation requires that a defendant make a false statement 

without knowledge of its falsity, the Court of Appeals correctly held that innocent 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2009 

 

2

misrepresentation does not constitute a viable cause of action under the SDA. Whether 

defendants did or did not possess personal knowledge of the infestation is a matter not 

before this Court as a result of plaintiffs’ abandonment of their fraudulent 

misrepresentation claim and their exclusive focus on their innocent misrepresentation 

claim.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 202 (Friday, October 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61804-61809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24454]



[[Page 61804]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-99]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-99 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 7, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 61805]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC08.020


[[Page 61806]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC08.021


[[Page 61807]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC08.022


[[Page 61808]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC08.023

[FR Doc. E8-24454 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1590 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1590

  To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain Federal 
                 Energy Regulatory Commission project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2007

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain Federal 
                 Energy Regulatory Commission project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
              COMMISSION PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the project numbered 7307 of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, the Commission shall, on the request of the 
licensee for the project, in accordance with that section (including 
the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that 
section and procedures established under that section), extend the time 
required for commencement of construction of the project until 24 
months after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to the project on 
the expiration of any extension, issued by the Commission under section 
13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the time required for 
commencement of construction of the project.
    (c) Reinstatement of Terminated License.--If a license of the 
Commission for the project has been terminated before the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall--
            (1) reinstate the license effective as of the date of the 
        termination of the license; and
            (2) extend the time required for commencement of 
        construction of the project until 24 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTRULE 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

                                           /s/ Katie S. Winchester                                           Chief Executive Officer                                            Date: March 15, 2006
EXHIBIT  99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report of Exchange Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas E. Funk. Vice President, Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C   1350, as enacted pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
(2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Thomas  E.  Funk


Thomas  E.  Funk
Vice  President,  Principal  Financial  Officer  and  Treasurer
March  31,  2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - 5 CFR Part 9901 
          - RIN 3206-AL62 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense; Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Defense (DoD) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 26, 2008 (73 FR 56344) a final rule governing the operation of the National Security Personnel System (NSPS), a human resources management system for DoD, as originally authorized by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 and amended by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. This correction document clarifies the effective date of the final rule.                     

# DATES:

Effective October 7, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

At DoD, Bradley B. Bunn, (703) 696-5303; for OPM, Charles D. Grimes III, (202) 418-3163. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. E8-22483, appearing on page 56344 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Friday, September 26, 2008, the                     **DATES**                     section should read, “Effective November 25, 2008.”                 

Office of Personnel Management. 

Charles D. Grimes III, 

Deputy Associate Director, Center for Performance and Pay Systems,  Department of Defense. 

Bradley B. Bunn,

Program Executive Officer, National Security Personnel System.

 [FR Doc. E8-23727 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1768 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1768

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide an exception 
to the 60-day limit on Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between 
  two physicians during the period in which one of the physicians is 
ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the Armed 
                                Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2007

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Lott, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide an exception 
to the 60-day limit on Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between 
  two physicians during the period in which one of the physicians is 
ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the Armed 
                                Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO 60-DAY LIMIT ON MEDICARE RECIPROCAL BILLING 
              ARRANGEMENTS IN CASE OF PHYSICIANS ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY 
              IN THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1842(b)(6)(D)(iii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u(b)(6)(D)(iii)) is amended by inserting after ``of 
more than 60 days'' the following: ``or are provided over a longer 
continuous period during all of which the first physician has been 
called or ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of 
the Armed Forces''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to services furnished on or after the date of the enactment of 
this section.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit No. (11)

                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 Statement - computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computations of Earnings per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                     For the Three Months
                                                        Ended March 31
                                           ---------------------------------------

                                                 1997                   1996
                                           ---------------        ----------------
<S>                                          <C>                    <C> 
Net Earnings                                  $3,195,000             $ 3,056,000
                                              ==========             ===========
 
Average common shares outstanding             15,040,000             15,040,000*
                                              ==========             ===========

Earnings per share of common stock            $      .21             $      .20*
                                              ==========             ===========

</TABLE> 

         *Adjusted for a 2 for 1 stock split-up effective May 22, 1996.
★(Star Print)

110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1612

AN ACT

To amend the penalty provisions in the International

Emergency Economic Powers Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Emer5 gency Economic Powers Enhancement Act’’.
 †

2

S 1612 ES

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF IEEPA.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 206 of the International

3 Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) is

4 amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘SEC. 206. PENALTIES.

6 ‘‘(a) UNLAWFUL ACTS.—It shall be unlawful for a

7 person to violate, attempt to violate, conspire to violate,

8 or cause a violation of any license, order, regulation, or

9 prohibition issued under this title.

10 ‘‘(b) CIVIL PENALTY.—A civil penalty may be im11 posed on any person who commits an unlawful act de12 scribed in subsection (a) in an amount not to exceed the

13 greater of—

14 ‘‘(1) $250,000; or

15 ‘‘(2) an amount that is twice the amount of the

16 transaction that is the basis of the violation with re17 spect to which the penalty is imposed.

18 ‘‘(c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—A person who willfully

19 commits, willfully attempts to commit, or willfully con20 spires to commit, or aids or abets in the commission of,

21 an unlawful act described in subsection (a) shall, upon

22 conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a nat23 ural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 20

24 years, or both.’’.

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—
†

3

S 1612 ES

1 (1) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 206(b) of the

2 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as

3 amended by subsection (a), shall apply to violations

4 described in section 206(a) of such Act with respect

5 to which enforcement action is pending or com6 menced on or after the date of the enactment of this

7 Act.

8 (2) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Section 206(c) of

9 the International Emergency Economic Powers Act,

10 as amended by subsection (a), shall apply to viola11 tions described in section 206(a) of such Act with

12 respect to which enforcement action is commenced

13 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate June 26, 2007.

Attest:

Secretary.
110TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1612

AN ACT

To amend the penalty provisions in the Interfor other purposes. national Emergency Economic Powers Act, and
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancer Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|June 28, 2004 |  | /s/ CHRISTOPHER D. HUGHESChristopher D. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02574-MSK-KMT

LIBERTY MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROTECTED DOMAIN SERVICES CUSTOMER NCR-3356109, d/b/a SITERIPKING.COM;

and 

JOHN DOES 2-10,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02754-MSK-KMT Document 7 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 27th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02754-MSK-KMT Document 7 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Robert E. McALLISTER et al., Appellants, v. Edna H. McALLISTER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

H. H. Taylor and Henry H. Taylor, Jr., both of Miami, for appellants.

Pine & Giblin, of Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for the respective parties.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1709 

To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to Freedom Act 

of 1998 to provide additional staff and oversight of funds to carry 

out the Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LEVIN, and Mr. 

OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Underground Railroad Network to 

Freedom Act of 1998 to provide additional staff and 

oversight of funds to carry out the Act, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Underground 

5 Railroad Network to Freedom Reauthorization Act of 

6 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 1709 IS

1 SEC. 2. HIRING STAFF FOR THE NATIONAL UNDERGROUND 

2 RAILROAD NETWORK. 

3 Section 3 of the National Underground Railroad Net4 work to Freedom Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 469l–1) is 

5 amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(d) STAFF.—The Secretary shall appoint at least 8 

8 full-time equivalent staff to assist the Secretary in car9 rying out duties under this Act, including providing over10 sight of the grant program established under section 4.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

12 The National Underground Railroad Network to 

13 Freedom Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 469l et seq.) is amend14 ed— 

15 (1) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 469l–2), by striking 

16 subsection (d); and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

19 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro20 priated for each fiscal year to carry out this Act 

21 $2,500,000. 

22 ‘‘(b) ALLOCATION.—Of the amounts made available 

23 under subsection (a)— 

24 ‘‘(1) $2,000,000 shall be allocated to carry out 

25 section 3; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•S 1709 IS

1 ‘‘(2) $500,000 shall be allocated to carry out 

2 section 4. 

3 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—Any amounts made available 

4 under this section shall be made available only to the Sec5 retary to carry out the responsibilities of the Secretary 

6 under this Act. 

7 ‘‘(d) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts made available under 

8 this section shall remain available until expended.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 The amendments made by sections 2 and 3 shall take 

11 effect at the beginning of the next fiscal year after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS