alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**Reportof Independent Auditors**

 

To the Board of Directorsof AmeriCredit Corp.

 

 

Re:                   Sale and Servicing Agreement related to AmeriCreditAutomobile Receivables Trust 2002-A as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2002

 

 

We have examined management’s assertion about AmeriCredit Corp. and itssubsidiaries’ (the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standardsidentified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *UniformSingle Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*, to the extent suchprocedures are applicable, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002included in the accompanying management assertion (Exhibit I).  Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’sassertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standardsestablished by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides areasonable basis for our opinion.  Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination of the Company’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company has compliedwith the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the yearended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

March 30, 2004

 

----

 

Exhibit I

 

Management’s Assertion Concerning Compliancewith USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

 

 

March 30, 2004

 

Re:                   Sale and Servicing Agreement related to AmeriCreditAutomobile Receivables Trust 2002-A as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2002

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, AmeriCredit Corp.and its subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with the minimumservicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers*(“USAP”), to the extent such procedures are applicable.

 
|  /s/  Clifton H. Morris |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Clifton H.  Morris           |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
|                         |
|  /s/  Daniel E. Berce   |   |
| Daniel E.  Berce             |
| President                    |
|                         |
|  /s/  Preston A. Miller |   |
| Preston A.  Miller           |
| Chief  Financial Officer     |
|                              |        |  |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report
of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 29, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    PHILIP L. HAWKINS
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Philip L. Hawkins Chief Executive
Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

Environmental Impact Statement: Charleston County, SC

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), USDOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
environmental impact statement will be prepared for a proposed highway 
project in Charleston County, South Carolina.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Lee, Division 
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 1835 Assembly Street, 
Suite 1270, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, Telephone: 803.765.5411, E-
mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the South 
Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) and Charleston County 
will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposed Mark 
Clark Expressway (I-526) located in Charleston County, South Carolina. 
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will serve as a cooperating agency in 
developing the EIS. Completing I-526 (Mark Clark Expressway) would 
improve mobility in the areas by serving the anticipated future traffic 
growth. The Interstate 526 extension project is approximately 7.1 miles 
long beginning at U.S. 17 (Savannah Highway) and terminating at SC 171 
(Folly Road).
    The FHWA and SCDOT are seeking input as a part of the scoping 
process to assist in identifying issues relative to this project. 
Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will be 
sent to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, and to private 
organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are known 
to have interest in this proposal. A formal public scoping meeting will 
be held between February and March 2008. A public meeting will be held 
between September and October 2008. In addition, a public hearing will 
be held after the approval of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(DEIS). Public notice will be given indicating the time and place of 
the meetings and hearing. The DEIS will be available for public and 
agency review and comment prior to the public hearing.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments, 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to the FHWA at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program).

    Issued on January 3, 2008.
Robert Lee,
Division Administrator, Columbia, South Carolina.
[FR Doc. E8-246 Filed 1-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
```
14‐1070

Akran v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT.  CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER

JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S

LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER

THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”).    A PARTY CITING A

SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second

Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley

Square, in the City of New York, on the 16th day of October , two thousand

fourteen.

      

PRESENT: CHESTER J. STRAUB,

    RICHARD C. WESLEY,

    DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON,

     Circuit Judges.

____________________________________________  

GODSON ODUBIYI AKRAN,  

     Plaintiff‐Appellant,

     ‐v.‐              No. 14‐1070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

     Defendant‐Appellee.   

____________________________________________  
2

FOR APPELLANT:   JAVIER N. MALDONADO, Law Office of Javier N.

Maldonado, P.C., San Antonio, TX.

FOR APPELLEE:    ELLIOT M. SCHACHNER, Varuni Nelson, Margaret M.

Kolbe, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Loretta E.

Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of

New York, Brooklyn, NY.   

____________________________________________  

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

New York (Eric N. Vitaliano, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Appellant Godson Akran brought this suit pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act.  Akran alleged that the United States falsely imprisoned him by

arresting and detaining him during the pendency of removal proceedings.  

Finding that the detention was legally privileged, the district court granted the

United States’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.  This appeal

followed.   

We AFFIRM on the ground that Akran’s Complaint fails to adequately

allege a cause of action.  Akran’s contention that immigration officials knew or

should have known that he was a United States citizen is conclusory and
3

implausible.  We have considered Akran’s remaining arguments and find them

to be without merit.  

     

       FOR THE COURT:

       Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


             Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm's Consent
             -------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-104257) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-113823) on Form S-3 of Platinum
Underwriters Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries ("Platinum") of our reports dated
February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Platinum
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the period April 19, 2002 (date of
inception) to December 31, 2002, and related financial statement schedules,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Platinum.

/s/ KPMG LLP
------------------

New York, New York
March 16, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         567,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,050,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,834,173
<PP&E>                                     120,222,967
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,593,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,553,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,024,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 92,723,564
<COMMON>                                        65,279
<OTHER-SE>                                 (13,161,518)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,096,239
<SALES>                                     11,241,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,241,130
<CGS>                                        5,148,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,168,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,406,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,076,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (333,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,042,634)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6923

GREGORY L. COOPER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-1778-AM)

Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory L. Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Ann Morken, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cooper v. Angelone, No. CA-96-1778-AM (E.D. Va. June

9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1088-1089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on January 14, 2010, 9 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    Portion open to the public:

[[Page 1089]]

    (1) Executive Committee Reports.
    Portion closed to the public:
    (A) Employer Status Determination--Employee Service Determination--
Decision on Remand--Former Police Officers of MTA.
    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: January 5, 2010.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-210 Filed 1-6-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OFJ. ROE BUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing
General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the
accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that
section. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ J. Roe BuckleyName: J. Roe BuckleyDate: March 29, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1867 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1867

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 conduct a study on the operation of helicopters over Long Island, New 
                      York and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2007

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
 conduct a study on the operation of helicopters over Long Island, New 
                      York and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON CERTAIN HELICOPTER OPERATIONS.

    (a) Study and Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall conduct a study and report to Congress on the 
helicopter operations over Long Island, New York. The study and report 
shall include information and recommendations with respect to the 
following:
            (1) The effect of helicopter traffic on residential areas 
        including--
                    (A) an analysis of the safety issues relating to 
                helicopter operations;
                    (B) an analysis of noise levels related to 
                helicopter operations and ways to abate the noise 
                levels; and
                    (C) an analysis of any other issue relating to 
                helicopter traffic on residential areas.
            (2) The feasibility of diverting helicopters from 
        residential areas.
            (3) The feasibility of creating specific air lanes for 
        helicopter operations.
            (4) The feasibility of establishing altitude limits for 
        helicopter operations.
    (b) Exceptions.--Any limitations or restrictions with respect to 
helicopter operations over Long Island, New York shall not apply to 
helicopters performing operations for accredited news organizations, 
law enforcement, or emergency services.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification PursuantTo 18 U.S.C. 1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jeffrey H. Sakamoto, Vice President – Finance and Administration of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 12, 2003 |   | /s/                       | Jeffrey H. Sakamoto |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|---------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   |                   |   | Jeffrey H. Sakamoto       |
|   |                   |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-144470 of Kforce Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 22, 2018 relating to the financial statements and supplemental schedule of the Kforce Government Practice Plan as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the year ended December 31, 2017 , appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Kforce Government Practice Plan for the year ended December 31, 2017 .


/s/ Warren Averett, LLC


Tampa, Florida


June 22, 2018
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO


STOCK
PURCHASE AGREEMENT





THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE
AGREEMENT (the “First
Amendment”) is made and entered into this 25th day
of March, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by
and between Water Science, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Water
Science”) and EAU Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”).





WITNESETH:




WHEREAS, the Corporation and Water
Science, and Water Science executed and delivered that certain Stock
Purchase Agreement, dated October 6, 2008 (the “Stock Purchase
Agreement”), pursuant to which Water Science agreed to purchase from the
Corporation, and Corporation agreed to sell to Water Science, a total of
2,500,000 shares of the Common Stock of the Corporation at a purchase price of
$1.00; and





WHEREAS, the Corporation and Water
Science desire to amend the Stock Purchase Agreement to modify the payment
schedule to the payment of the Purchased Shares.





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:





1.           Amendment.  Section
2 of the Stock Purchase Agreement is hereby amended by changing the payment
dates for the Purchased Shares for the payments due on February 16,
2009, March 16, 2009 and April 15, 2009 as follows:





Payment
      Date
            Purchase
      Price
            Purchased
      SharesApril
      15th,  2009
            $250,000
            250,000
      sharesMay
      15th,
      2009
            $250,000
            250,000
      sharesJune
      15th,
      2009
            $250,000
            250,000
      sharesJuly
      15th,
      2009
            $200,000
            200,000
      shares





2.           Miscellaneous.





(a)           All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to them in the Stock Purchase Agreement.





(b)           Except
as expressly set forth in this First Amendment, the Stock Purchase Agreement
shall remain unchanged and unmodified and in full force and effect.





(c)           This
First Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall
together be considered one and the same agreement.














[Signatures begin on following
page.]




2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed and delivered this Stock Purchase Agreement on the date
first written above.






CORPORATION:EAU
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:
              /s/ Wade
      R. BradleyWade
      R. Bradley
                Chief
      Executive Officer
   WATER SCIENCE,
      LLC:By:
                /s/ Peter
      F. UllrichPeter
      F. Ullrich, Manager
 3