alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John S. Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sybase, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ JOHN S. CHENName: John S. ChenTitle:   Chief Executive Officer and President
 I, Pieter A. Van der Vorst, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Sybase, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Sybase, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ PIETER A. VAN DER VORSTName: Pieter A. Van der VorstTitle:   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 44
389 A.2d 681

#### Commonwealth v. Lightfoot, Appellant.

Submitted November 14, 1977.

Ralph J. Cappy, Public Defender, for appellant;

Robert E. Colville, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 202 (Friday, October 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-30-000]


Elm Creek Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 10, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Elm Creek Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 30, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#460003140509282a2f282315333636293432062023342568212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3959681909cbdbfbabdb680a6a3a3bca1a793b5b6a1b0fdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24661 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 170 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on telephone and other communications services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. COBURN, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on telephone and other communications 

services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telephone Excise Tax 

5 Repeal Act of 2007’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 170 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND 

2 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 33 of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 (relating to facilities and services) is 

5 amended by striking subchapter B. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed 

9 by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of 

10 chapter 33,’’ and inserting ‘‘and chapter 32 (other 

11 than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 

12 4121),’’. 

13 (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such 

14 Code is amended by striking ‘‘section 4251 or’’. 

15 (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such 

16 Code is amended— 

17 (i) by striking ‘‘imposed by—’’ and all that 

18 follows through ‘‘with respect to’’ and inserting 

19 ‘‘imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect 

20 to’’, and 

21 (ii) by striking ‘‘bills rendered or’’. 

22 (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) 

23 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘Communica24 tions Services and’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 170 IS

1 (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by 

2 striking ‘‘4251, 4261, or 4271’’ each place it ap3 pears and inserting ‘‘4261 or 4271’’. 

4 (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such 

5 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

6 subparagraph (B), by striking subparagraph (C), 

7 and by redesignating subparagraph (D) as subpara8 graph (C). 

9 (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of 

10 such Code is amended by striking the item relating 

11 to subchapter B. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills 

14 first rendered more than 90 days after the date of the 

15 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Exhibit 32.1 

Certifications Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Radiant Logistics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: September 28, 2015 

 

| By:    |   | /s/ Bohn H. Crain              |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Bohn H. Crain                  |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer        |
|   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)  |
|   |   |                           |
| By:    |   | /s/ Todd E. Macomber           |
|   |   | Todd E. Macomber               |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   |   | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
216 La. 762

#### SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. STATE MINERAL BOARD et al.

No. 39655.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1949.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1950.

F. P. Jones, Jr., Houston, Tex., Liskow & Lewis, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen.,’ Carroll Buck, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., John L. Madden, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant-appellee.

McCALEB, Justice.

This case was consolidated for all purposes with the suit of The Texas Company v. State Mineral Board et al., 216 La. 742, 44 So.2d 841. The decision in that matter controls here.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Gary D. McGaha, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Community Bancshares, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2006                                                      /s/ Gary D. McGaha   Gary D. McGaha   Principal Executive Officer  
46
#### Haefner et al., Executors and Trustees, *v.*Heuck, County Aud., et al.

(No. 25462

Decided October 16, 1935.)

*Mr. Joseph 8. Gray don, Mr. Joseph L. LacJcner, Mr. George A. Dornette, Mr. Joseph H. Head,*and *Messrs. Maxwell & Ramsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John W. BricJcer,*attorney general, *Mr. William J. Ford, Mr. Louis J. Schneider,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Walter M. Locke,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit31(b)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David A. Christensen, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HickoryTech;

 

2.                                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                                       The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 12, 2003

 
| /s/ David A. Christensen |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David A. Christensen     |
| Chief Financial Officer  |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1650

LOUIS PATIENT MASSING,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 25, 2022 Decided: March 30, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis Patient Massing, Petitioner Pro Se. Jessica R. Lesnau, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Louis Patient Massing, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the 

Immigration Judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, 

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 

We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of Massing’s merits hearing 

before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We lack jurisdiction to review 

final orders of removal of aliens such as Massing who are removable due to having been 

convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 

1252(a)(2)(C). We retain jurisdiction to review constitutional claims or questions of law. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). However, Massing has not raised any such issue. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review with respect to the denial of asylum and 

withholding of removal. Turning to Massing’s challenge to the denial of CAT protection, 

see Nasrallah v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (2020) (holding that the criminal review bar at 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) does not preclude judicial review of noncitizen’s factual challenges 

to the denial of CAT protection), we conclude that substantial evidence supports the denial 

of relief. See In re Massing (B.I.A. May 26, 2021); 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2021). 

Accordingly, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART

AND DENIED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    768152
<NAME>                   Triton Asset Management, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                    US Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS                              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                                 0
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               3820
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          159000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (162820)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           0
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the June 30,
1999 financial statements of World Services, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,136,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,160,036
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,728,036
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,715
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,673,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,728,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,876
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .026
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .026





</TABLE>
No. 71-6778.

No. 72-5161.

#### Williams *v.*California, Saffioti *v.*United States,

409 U. S. 1073; and

409 U. S. 908. Motions for leave to file petitions for rehearing denied.