alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer of Annual Report

I, Steven Spooner, Chief Financial Officer of Mitel Networks Corporation (Mitel), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mitel, for the fiscal
year ended April 30, 2010 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Mitel.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: July 27, 2010 |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /S/ STEVEN E. SPOONER         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Steven E. Spooner       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF

BYLAWS

OF

COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP

a California Corporation

 

Keith C. Robbins and James S. Rickards certify that:

 

1.              They are the dulyelected and acting President and Secretary, respectively, of COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP.

 

2.              The followingamendment has been approved by the shareholders of COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP atthe annual meeting held May 25, 2006.

 

3.              Article III Section 3.2of the Bylaws of COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP shall be amended to read as follows:

 

**Section 3.2,Numberand Qualification of Directors.** The authorized number of directors ofthe corporation shall not be less than eight (8) nor more than fifteen(15) until changed by an amendment of the articles of incorporation or a bylawamending this Section 3.2 duly adopted by the vote or written consent ofholders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.  The exact number of directors shall be fixedfrom time to time, within t the range specified in the articles ofincorporation or in this Section 3.2: (i) by a resolution dulyadopted by the board; (ii) by a bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted bythe vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote represented at a dulyheld meeting at which a quorum is present, or by the written consent of theholders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote; or (iii) byapproval of the shareholders (as defined in Section 153 of the Code).

 

4.              The foregoingamendment was one of which must be adopted by the shareholders of the company.

 

 
|   | //s// Keith C Robbins        |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Keith C. Robbins, President  |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | //s// James S Rickards       |
|   | James S. Rickards, Secretary |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information Extracted From The
     Consolidated Balance Sheets And Consolidated Statements Of Income Found
     On Pages 2, 3 And 4 Of The Companys 10-Q For The Year-to-date, And Is
     Qualified In Its Entirety By Reference To Such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2,735
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (190)
<INVENTORY>                                    38,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,689
<PP&E>                                         51,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                109,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,520
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           89
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  109,915
<SALES>                                        62,693
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               63,157
<CGS>                                          47,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,374)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 5,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,047
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .38
        


</TABLE>
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BÁSICO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - SABESP (the Company) on Form 20 F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: July 15, 2010 By:
     /s/ Rui de Britto Álvares AffonsoName:
Title:
     Rui de Britto Álvares Affonso
Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer


---
#### W. E. ROBINSON et al., Appellants, v. Ben HANDLER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Frank Redd, of Sarasota, for appellants.

John F. Burket, of Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellee.
389 A.2d 199

#### Commonwealth v. Panziani, Appellant.

Submitted November 23, 1977.

James M. Keller, for appellant;

Paul W. Johnson, Assistant District Attorney, and Donald E. Williams, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consid-' eration or decision of this case.
- 1 - 

# United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit

No. 15-2245

JAMES WALSH,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a ZURICH DIRECT MARKETS, d/b/a ZURICH NORTH AMERICA COMMERCIAL, d/b/a ZURICH NORTH AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants, Appellants.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court issued on February 22, 2017 is
amended as follows:

On page 34, line 3: replace "Igham" with "Ingham."

On page 37, in the concluding paragraph, line 5, replace "entitle Walsh" with "give Walsh a right."

On page 37, in the concluding paragraph, line 9, replace the periods with commas following "reasonableness" and "193," and add following "193,": "and, if the jury finds a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, the appropriate amount of damages."
[ J

- 65

- 2019 ] [MO: Saylor, C.J. ]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

KAREEM JOHNSON,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 40 EAP 2018

Appeal from the Order of Superior
Court entered on 06/27/2018 at No. 927 EDA 2016 affirming the Order
entered on 03/03/2016 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, at No.
CP

- 51

- CR

- 1300424

- 2006.

ARGUED: September 10, 2019

CONCURRING O PINION

JUSTICE DOUGHERTY DECIDED: May 19, 2020

I fully join the majority opinion and write separately only to express my view tha t,

although our decision broadens the jeopardy relief standard requiring intentional

prosecutorial misconduct to include reckless (conscious) prosecutorial disregard of a

substantial risk the defendant will be denied a fair trial, the standard continues to be a

stringent one that will be satisfied only in eg regious cases. Thi s Court has previously

authorized dismissal of charges as a sanction for blatant intentional prosecutorial

overreaching desi g ned either to provoke a defendant into a mistrial or depriv e a defendant

of a fair trial. Commonwealth v. Smith , 615 A.2d 321 (Pa. 1992); Commonwealth v.

Martarano , 741 A.2d 1221 (Pa. 1999). Nevertheless, this Court has also consistently

cautioned that dismissal of charges is an extreme remedy that should be imposed

sparingly. Commonwealth v. Burke , 781 A.2d 1136, 1144 (Pa. 2001). Our decision today

reinforces our jurisprudence holding dismissal of charges is an appropriate remedy when[ J

- 65

- 2019 ] [MO: Saylor, C.J. ]

- 2

there is deliberate and egregious overreaching by the prosecution. However, I do not

read our decision as suggesting dismissal of charges is warran ted in every case of

prosecutorial misconduct

. In the face of a double jeopardy challenge, u nless there is

evidence to support a finding of d eliberate and reckless prosecutorial disregard of a

substantial risk the defendant will be denied a fair trial, th e remedy shoul d be less severe

than dismissal. Where such evidentiary support is lacking, the appropriate remedy will

normally include the award of a new trial.
#### Hutchinson *v.*Evans, Admr. *

(No. 25748

Decided January 22, 1936.)

*Mr. John J. Tetlow*and *Mr. John J. Sheehan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Winfield Worline,*for defendant in error.

*

 Reporter’s Note: For decision on merits, see *posit*553.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error he, and the same is héreby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Judge John L. Kane 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02755-JLK-KMT 

JONATHAN REYES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SNOWCAP CREAMERY, INC., 

EMILY ARNOLD, and 

ROBERT ARNOLD, 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

______________________________________________________________________ 

Kane, J. 

THE COURT, per Joel C. Maguire’s and Dietze and Davis, P.C.’s Motion To Withdraw 

As Counsel For Defendants With Notice Of Withdrawal To Defendants, Doc. 122, and being 

fully advised in the premises, 

FINDS that Defendants and all counsel of record have been notified in accordance with 

D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(b) and that good cause exists for the motion. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Joel C. Maguire and Dietze and Davis, P.C. 

are permitted to withdraw as counsel for Defendants. 

DATED: October 16, 2014 BY THE COURT: 

 s/John L. Kane 

 John L. Kane, U.S. Senior District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02755-JLK-KMT Document 125 Filed 10/16/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the CardioDynamics InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael K. Perry, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: March 30, 2005 **
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AU R A A L I C I A MOR AL E S C AS T R O, P et i t i on er , v. M IC H A E L B . M U K A S E Y , A tt orney G e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 72221 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 812- 325 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A ur aA l i c i aM or a l e s C a s tr o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order s um m ar i l y a ff i rm i ng an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i ons f ora s y l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED JU N 03 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 72221 2 f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f in d in g s o f

f a c t, Zehat

yev. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1 1 8 4 - 8 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) , an dd e n o v o c la im s o f du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s , Sa ndoval-L un a v. Mukasey , 5 2 6 F .3 d1 2 4 3 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. M or a l e s C a s tr o c ont e nds s he w i l lbe harm e d ba s e d on he rm e m be r s hip i n a part i cul arsoci algrou p con si st i ng of G uat em al an w om en w ho have w i tness ed s e r io u s c r im e s . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e I J ’s f in d in g th a t s h e f

a ile dto dem on strat e thatshe w as or w ou l d b e per se cut ed on the basi s of aprot ec t ed g r o u n d . Se e G o rm le

yv . A s h c r o

ft , 36 4 F . 3d11 72 , 11 77 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( fe ar s s te m m in g f

r o m is o la te dc r im in a l a c ts o f v io le n c e d o n o t p r o v id e ab a s is f o rr e lie f ) . M o r a le s C a s tr o ’s a s s e rtio n th a t th e I Jv io la te dh e rdu e p r o c e s s r ig h ts b yf a ilin g to a d d r e s s th e g e n d e ra s p e c t o f h e rc la im is b e lie db yth e r e c o r d . See Colm enar v. I NS , 210 F . 3d 967, 971- 72 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr ort o e s t abl i s h adue pr oc e s s vi ol a t i on) . A c c or di ngl y , M or a l e s C a s tr o’ s a s y l um and w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See O choa v. G on zales , 40 6 F . 3d11 66 , 11 72 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Exhibit 23.4

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation in this registration statement on Form S-4 of
New England Community Bancorp, Inc., of our report dated January 23, 1998,
except for Note 15 as to which the date is March 19, 1998, on our audits of the
financial statements of Bank of South Windsor as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 which
report is incorporated by reference in Bank of South Windsor's 1997 Annual
Report 10-K. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading
"Experts" in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus which is part of such
Registration Statement.


                                               /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Arthur Andersen LLP




Hartford, Connecticut
June 23, 1998
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2291

___________

Michael Anthony Gottson, Sr., also *

known as Michael Anthony Gotson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Arkansas Children&s Hospital, Director; * Appeal from the United States

DOES, Physicians, Health Care * District Court for the

Providers, Specialists, Director, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Tending Nurses, Administrative *

Supervisor-tending status, Night Flight * [UNPUBLISHED]

Medical Emergency Transportation *

Unit Pilots & Health Care Providers *

and/or Medical Staff who treated *

Anthony Gotson, Jr., *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: November 23, 1999

 Filed: November 26, 1999 

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Michael Anthony Gottson, Sr., appeals the District Court’s1 Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his medical malpractice action. We deny

Gottson’s post-appeal motion to join additional defendants and add claims. See Spear

v. Dayton’s, 771 F.2d 1140, 1144 (8th Cir. 1985) (claims not presented to District

Court need not be considered). After a de novo review of the record, we conclude

dismissal was proper, and a comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack

precedential value. We thus affirm the District Court’s opinion without further

discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATE OF CFO**
     I, Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer of Southern CommunityBancshares, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, based on my knowledge:
(3) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant, to whichthis certificate is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and (4) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Registrant.   Dated: March 29, 2004 /s/ Leslye L. Grindle   Leslye L. Grindle, Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.1**     Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     I, Donald W. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of Mitel Networks    Corporation (“Mitel”), certify, pursuant to    18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:      (1)     the Annual Report on    Form 20-F/A    of Mitel, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, filed    with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the    date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and      (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Mitel. /s/  Donald    W. Smith    Name:     Donald W. Smith     Title:     Chief Executive Officer     Date: November 21, 2007
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1648 

For the relief of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and 

Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2007 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, 

Caroline Vang, and Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Guy Vang, Gene7 vieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ 

8 Vang shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 

9 and remained in, the United States, and shall each be eli10 gible for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1648 IS

1 admitted for permanent residence under section 245 of the 

2 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon 

3 filing an application for such adjustment of status. 

4 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub5 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust6 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

7 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

9 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to Guy 

10 Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and Meline 

11 ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

12 proper officer to reduce by 4, during the current or subse13 quent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that 

14 are made available to natives of the country of the birth 

15 of Guy Vang, Genevieve Chong Foung, Caroline Vang, and 

16 Meline ‘‘Melanie’’ Vang under section 202(a)(2) of the Im17 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(2)), as 

18 applicable. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this registration statement of our report dated October 5, 1999
included in American TeleSource International, Inc.'s Form 10-KA for the year
ended July 31, 1999 and to all references to our Firm included in this
registration statement.


                                        /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


     San Antonio, Texas
     April 28, 2000
#### Mae BURDETTE v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MURPHYSBORO et al.

No. 6431.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1937.

Soelke, Koehn & Loewy, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.

Harold F.- Lindley, of Danville, 111., for appellees.

Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of counsel for appelleés, and upon consideration of the certificate of the clérk of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this cause be docketed in this court and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.