alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1877 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that members of the 

Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military 

salute during hoisting, lowering, or passing of flag. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to prescribe that 

members of the Armed Forces and veterans out of uniform may render the military salute during hoisting, 

lowering, or passing of flag. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDUCT BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

4 FORCES AND VETERANS OUT OF UNIFORM 

5 DURING HOISTING, LOWERING, OR PASSING 

6 OF FLAG. 

7 Section 9 of title 4, United States Code, is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘all persons present’’ and all that follows 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 1877 CPS

1 through the end and inserting ‘‘those present in uniform 

2 should render the military salute. Members of the Armed 

3 Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform 

4 may render the military salute. All other persons present 

5 should face the flag and stand at attention with their right 

6 hand over the heart, or if applicable, remove their head7 dress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, 

8 the hand being over the heart. Citizens of other countries 

9 should stand at attention. All such conduct toward the flag 

10 in a moving column should be rendered at the moment 

11 the flag passes.’’. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
I N THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JO SHUA RICHARD BERGENTY , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 938 LT Case No. 2017

- CF

- 000055

- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 1 4 , 2 022 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Citru s County , Richard A. Howard, J udge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek , Ass istant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert s J. Bradford, Jr., As sistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.2 In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following revocation of Appellant’s probation. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated Special Condition 28, not Special Condition 15 , and for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $50.00 (not $100.00) for the Public Defender Application Fee. See Harrison v. State , 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). A FFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. EVAN DER, EDWARDS , and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

.
February 28, 2007

Mr. Stuart P. Litt

Northport Systems, Inc.

215 Scudder Avenue

Northport, NY  11768

Dear Stuart:

American Technical Ceramics Corp. would like to extend the January 1, 2004 Consulting Agreement between American Technical Ceramics Corp. and Northport Systems, Inc. for a period of one year. The extended Agreement would expire on December 31, 2007. This would be the third one-year extension of this Agreement. Other than the extension of the Agreement, all terms of the Agreement would remain the same. 

If you agree to extend the Consulting Agreement until December 31, 2007, please sign one copy of this letter and return it to my attention at the address below.

|   |   |   | Yours truly,                                            |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /S/ Kathleen M. Kelly                                   |
|   |   |   | Kathleen M. Kelly

Vice President – Administration |

KMK

Agree to:

 

|                                        |   |   |          |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------|
| /S/ Stuart P. Litt                          |   |   | March 1, 2007 |
| Stuart P. Litt

For Northport Systems, Inc. |   |   | Date          |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of SinoFresh HealthCare, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Scott
        M.
        Klein, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Date: March
              30, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Scott
              M.
              KleinScott
              M. KleinChief
              Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant

To 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cyanotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey H. Sakamoto, VicePresident – Finance and Administration of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)                                      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

2)                                      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | February 11, 2005                                |   |    /s/  Jeffrey H. Sakamoto |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeffrey H.  Sakamoto                                  |
|   | *Vice  President – Finance & Administration* |

 

1

----
#### DEMKO v. MEEKS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
OptionAgreementAmendment1018v2




Exhibit 10.18


AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


To:  [Recipient Name] (Employee Number:  nnnnn)


Dated:  [Date]


Reference is made to the Stock Option Agreement (the "Agreement") dated [Date] between you and Covisint Corporation (the "Corporation") pursuant to which the Company granted to you the Option to purchase [#shares] Shares at $[price] per share, upon the terms and conditions contained therein and in the 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan").  Pursuant to the Plan and with the approval of the Corporation's Board of Directors in accordance with the Plan, the Corporation amends your Agreement, as set forth herein, to add a new "tandem" Stock Appreciation Right (the "SAR").  The SAR is applicable only to the portion of your Option that is exercisable in 2014 (the "2014 Portion").  The SAR becomes exercisable on June 24, 2014, and it will expire on the earliest of the date of Compuware Corporation’s distribution of the common stock of the Corporation to its shareholders, the exercise of the related Option, or December 31, 2014.  


To the extent that the 2014 Portion of the Option is exercisable in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, you may elect to exercise the SAR with respect to a number of Shares not to exceed the number of Shares of the 2014 Portion of the Option that are then exercisable. Upon exercise of the SAR (a) the Corporation will pay to you, no later than 5 business days following such exercise, a cash payment equal to the product of (1) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is being exercised and (2) the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the related Option and (b) the related 2014 Portion of the Option shall immediately terminate with respect to the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised (and you shall no longer have the right to acquire and you shall not in fact acquire such number of Shares).  You may exercise the SAR with respect to all or a portion of the Shares with respect to which it is exercisable.  The Corporation will allow you to exercise the SAR four (4) times during the period the SAR is exercisable without cost.  For each exercise of the SAR above four (4) times, the Corporation will charge you $.05 per Share being exercised.


Section 3 (relating to non-transferability), 7 (relating to rights as a stockholder) and 8 (relating to withholding taxes) of the Agreement shall apply to the SARs granted hereunder.


For federal income tax purposes, this Amendment to Stock Option Agreement is intended in substance to constitute a mere amendment of the 2014 Portion of your Option to provide you with the alternative of receiving the value of the 2014 Portion of your Option in cash, in lieu of you exercising the Option and acquiring the underlying Shares. This Amendment to Stock Option Agreement is not intended to effectuate a new and separate grant of or relating to the Shares of the Company under the Plan.


Very truly yours,




COVISINT CORPORATION




By:_____________________
Michael A. Sosin
Vice President, General Counsel

11
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      September 19, 2008 | By:    | /s/  Charles      Fust                                                                                                           |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Charles  Fust                                                                                                                              |
|                               |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)Acting      Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Accounting Officer)  |
SEVERANCE PLAN EXTENSION RESOLUTION

RESOLVED, that the Severance Pay Plan for Eligible Employees of Michael Foods,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Severance Plan"), as approved and implemented in
accordance with the directives of the Board of Directors on July 26, 1990 and
extended through July 1, 1999, be hereby extended for a period of one additional
year to a new Termination Date of July 1, 2000.

    Number of employees covered under the Severance Plan
                       from July 1, 1998 to July 1, 1999......................17

    Employees added:
         Pres Colwell - Vice President U.S. Bus. Development
         Erich Fritz - Vice President of Operations - Kohler Mix
         James Kohler - President - Kohler Mix
         Ken Neishi - Vice President of Operations - M. G. Waldbaum
         Terry Baker - Vice President of Procurement - M. G. Waldbaum
         Tim Bebee - Vice President of Live Production - M. G. Waldbaum
         Thomas Rechsteiner - Vice President Industrial/Export 
                                   Sales - M. G. Waldbaum
         James Haynes - Vice President of Operations - Northern Star
         Vicky Wass - Vice President Regional Sales/National Accts. - Papetti's
         Toby Catherman - Vice President of Operations - Papetti's
         
    Employees deleted:
         Jeffrey Walker - M. G. Waldbaum (resigned)
         Robert Banken - Kohler Mix Specialties (resigned)
         Steven Goldstein - Kohler Mix Specialties (resigned)

         Number of employees covered under the Severance Plan
                   from July 1, 1999 to July 1, 2000..........................24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-WJM-MJW

DALIP BASANTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,

JASON ROZESKI, M.D., and

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS EMTALA CLAIMS

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dalip Basanti’s and Defendant Jeffrey

Metcalf, M.D.’s Stipulated Motion to Dismiss EMTALA claims as Alleged Against Dr.

Metcalf, filed December 30, 2011 (ECF No. 23). The Court being fully advised hereby

ORDERS as follows:

The Stipulated Motion to Dismiss EMTALA Claims as Alleged against Dr. Metcalf

is GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that any and all claims against Dr. Metcalf

concerning the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. §

1395dd (“EMTALA”), including paragraph 228(f), in its entirety, of Plaintiff’s Complaint,

and the EMTALA reference contained in paragraph 228(g) of Plaintiff’s Complaint are

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 25 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated this 3rd day of January, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB Document 25 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141735 & (85)(89)(90) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141735 

 COA: 286912 

Muskegon CC: 07-055536-FH 

ARTHUR CORTEZ GREER, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion to amend the application for leave to appeal is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2010 judgment of the Court 

of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to remand are 

DENIED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00520-CV

In re Daniel J. Barrera

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Filed: September 5, 2014
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification of CEO under Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Icertify that this periodic report containing the issuer’s financial statementsfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained In this periodic report fairly presents in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 
|   | By:                                                                           | /s/  Keith C Robbins |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|   |        Keith  C. Robbins                   |
|   |        President,  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |        March 30,  2009                |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-5106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1) 

Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: December 8, 2009 

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Whitney E. C. 

Minter, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, 

Andrew McCormack, Special Assistant United States Attorney, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Richard Henry Robinson appeals the district court’s 

judgment entered pursuant to his guilty plea to failure to 

register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 

(2006). Robinson reserved, in his plea agreement, the right to 

challenge on appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to 

dismiss the indictment against him. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error in light of this court’s recent 

authoritative decision in United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 

(4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

in Gould. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02689-MSK-KLM

TOM LORIMOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

CARIDIANBCT, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 27th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02689-MSK-KLM Document 4 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kathleen P. Iverson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                       /s/ Kathleen P. Iverson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Kathleen P. Iverson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CyberOptics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
G. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                       /s/ Scott G. Larson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Scott G. Larson
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request