alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,John F. Coger, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Community Valley Bancorp;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annualreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  March 16, 2006 | By:                               | /s/  John F. Coger |   |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                  |                              |               |   |
|                  | John F. Coger                     |
|                  | Executive Vice President, CFO/COO |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding The Meeting:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Date And Time:

Thursday, October 23, 2008, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

 Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 “L” Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

# Status:

 The meeting will be open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered

 

## Open Session

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. Issues Facing Hispanics in the Federal Workplace—Invited Panelists.

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

                        Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.                         *Contact Person for More Information:*                         Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer, on (202) 663-4070.                    

Dated: October 9, 2008.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. E8-24609 Filed 10-10-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 29, 2014

t0122

Order 

Clerk

January 29, 2014

147571

CINTAS CORPORATION,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 147571

COA: 312004

Ct of Claims: 11-001391-AA

STATE TAX COMMISSION and MACOMB

TOWNSHIP,

Respondents-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 2, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
2000 QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,366
<SECURITIES>                                    11,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                       323
<INVENTORY>                                      5,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,760
<PP&E>                                         188,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,533
<BONDS>                                         43,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,643
<SALES>                                          1,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,275
<CGS>                                            1,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,712
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Sean Michael McGuire v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00240-CR

Trial court case number: 10-DCR-055898

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant timely appealed from a conviction for the offense of murder. On 

May 19, 2014, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record, which did not contain a 

certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 

34.5(a)(12); see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) 

(“The court of appeals must dismiss an appeal if a certification showing that the 

defendant has the right to appeal is not made a part of the appellate record.”). 

On March 19, 2015, this Court issued a notice to the trial court clerk that the 

certification of appellant’s right to appeal was missing from the clerk’s record and 

we directed the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to appeal 

within 30 days of the notice, or by April 20, 2015. No supplemental clerk’s record 

was filed. 

An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 613. In connection with this record, pursuant to Tex. 

R. App. P. 37.1 and 44.4, we direct the trial court, on or before September 21, 
2015, to

a) file a supplemental clerk’s record with any existing certification of 

the defendant’s right of appeal with this court, or

b) prepare a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal, if 

appropriate, and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

certification with this court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 3, 2015
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification PursuantTo 18 U. S. C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I Jeffrey H. Sakamoto, Chief Financial Officer certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-Q of Cyanotech Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | August 12, 2003 | /s/ Jeffrey H. Sakamoto               |   |
|--------|----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                 |    Jeffrey H. Sakamoto |   |
|   |                 | *Chief Financial Officer*             |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

EZZIE CHARLES JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 651 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00358-CV

Harald Thiel and Heather Thiel

v.

Fred W. Rusteberg, Charles Willette Jr., Diann M. Bartek, and International Bank of 

Commerce

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-CCL-01215-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 24, 2019
WAIVER OF BENEFITS


 


This Waiver of Benefits (this “Waiver”)
is entered into as of the 30th day of December, 2013, by and among First Reliance Bancshares, Inc., a South Carolina corporation
(the “Company”), First Reliance Bank, a bank chartered under South Carolina law and a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Corporation (the “Bank” and together with the Company, the “Employer”),
and Thomas Ewart, Sr. (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive
entered into that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of 4/23/2003, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Employment
Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.2(a)
of the Employment Agreement, the Employer agreed to pay or cause to be paid the Executive’s initiation and membership assessments
and dues in a country club of the Executive’s choice (the “Benefits”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Employer desires to
cease providing initiation and membership assessments and dues in country clubs to its employees and any reinstatement of this
benefit is at the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer. The Executive voluntarily agrees to waive and relinquish the right
to continue to receive the Benefits under Section 2.2(a) of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration
of the promises, and the mutual covenants and agreements contained in the Employment Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.The
Executive hereby voluntarily waives and relinquishes the right to continue to receive the Benefits set forth under Section 2.2(a)
of the Employment Agreement and hereby waives and relinquishes the right to assert any and all claims relating to the Benefits.


 


2.Except as provided in Section 1, above, the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.This
Waiver may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one instrument binding on the parties, notwithstanding that both parties are not signatories to the original
or the same counterpart. This Waiver shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
successors and assigns.


 


4.This Waiver shall be governed by
and construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of South Carolina, notwithstanding its conflicts
of laws, principles or any other rule, regulation or principle that would result in the application of another state’s laws.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has
caused this Waiver to be executed as of the date first set forth above.


  


	EXECUTIVE	 	FIRST RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Thomas Ewart, Sr	 	/s/ Jeffrey A. Paolucci
	 	 	By: 	Jeffrey A. Paolucci
	 	 	Its:	CFO
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FIRST RELIANCE BANK
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Jeffrey A. Paolucci
	 	 	By: 	Jeffrey A. Paolucci
	 	 	Its:	CFO








 






    	 



    	 



    

 


Exhibit A


 


Employment Agreement


(Omitted)
Exhibit 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, the trustee (the "Trustee") in respect of the Trust
Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2002-1, hereby certifies to Bear Stearns Depositor
Inc. as follows:

     1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on
          Form 8-K filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as
          Trustee for the Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2002-1 Trust and
          any distribution reports filed in respect of the Trust during the
          2004 calendar year;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in those reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by the
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
          required to be provided to the depositor by the Trustee under the
          trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in such
          reports; and

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge, except
          as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee has fulfilled its
          obligations under the trust agreement.


                      U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
                      ASSOCIATION


                      By:      /s/ Thomas E. Tabor
                      --------------------------------------
                      Name:   Thomas E. Tabor
                      Title:  Vice President
                      Date:   March 28, 2005
#### Wilson WOOTEN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 19, 1971.

Wilson Wooten, in pro. per.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., George F. Rabe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Wooten was convicted in 1944 of murder. He appealed from the judgment, which we affirmed. Wooten v. Commonwealth, 299 Ky. 598, 186 S.W.2d 652 (1945). Now, 27 years later, he seeks to vacate the judgment. RCr 11.42. His petition was denied without affording an evidentiary hearing.

*117He alleged inadequate assistance of counsel and matters related thereto. The record refutes those allegations. Dorton v. Com., Ky., 433 S.W.2d 117 (1968); Penn v. Com., Ky., 427 S.W.2d 808 (1968); Dupin v. Com., Ky., 408 S.W.2d 443 (1966); Jones v. Com., Ky., 388 S.W.2d 601 (1965).

He charged that the transcript of evidence on his trial did not accurately reflect the proceedings and that the bill of exceptions was suppressed. He is too late to make these assertions. McKinney v. Com,. Ky., 445 S.W.2d 874 (1969); Brown v. Com., Ky., 396 S.W.2d 773 (1965).

The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7168

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SERGIO ANTONIO BLANCO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-144)

Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sergio Antonio Blanco, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Ann Colombell,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sergio Antonio Blanco appeals the district court’s order denying his request for a downward departure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Blanco, No. CR-90-144 (E.D. Va. June 11, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   768408
<NAME>                                  Cyanotech Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>           Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>             Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                       221
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                856
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9
<INVENTORY>                                1,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,075
<PP&E>                                    25,903
<DEPRECIATION>                             6,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            22,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,627
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                      69
<OTHER-SE>                                19,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              22,343
<SALES>                                    1,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,496
<CGS>                                      1,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                (609)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.05)



</TABLE>