alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 SCHEDULE A
TO
EXHIBIT 10.2
   Effective Date
    
    Execution DateName
    
    Current Offices Held with Registrant
    
    of Agreement
    
    of AgreementDuane L. Sinn
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Rurban
Financial Corp.; Treasurer and
Director of Rurban Operations Corp.
    
    March 1, 2006
    
    May 17, 2006Henry R. Thiemann
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of Exchange Bank;
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of RFCBC, Inc.
    
    March 1, 2006*
    
    May 19, 2006Mark A. Klein
    
    President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director of The State Bank and
Trust Company
    
    March 1, 2006
    
    May 30, 2006
 
 *
    
    Remains subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC.
"Date","Total","Federal","Nonfederal Total","Nonfederal Households","Nonfederal Business","Nonfederal State and local govts"
"1997",5.3,5.8,9.0,4.3,0.6,
"1998",6.8,7.8,12.3,6.3,-1.4,
"1999",6.4,8.4,10.6,3.4,-1.9,
"2000",4.9,9.0,9.2,1.3,-8.0,
"2001",6.3,9.3,5.9,8.8,-0.2,
"","","","","","",""
"2002",7.2,10.6,2.5,11.0,7.6,
"2003",8.2,11.6,2.6,8.3,10.9,
"2004",9.0,11.6,5.8,7.4,9.0,
"2005",9.4,11.5,7.6,10.2,7.0,
"2006",8.1,8.7,9.6,8.2,3.9,
"","","","","","",""
"2006Q1",8.9,9.3,10.0,3.3,8.0,
"2006Q2",7.5,9.2,8.8,6.7,1.0,
"2006Q3",6.9,7.9,7.0,8.2,3.6,
"2006Q4",8.2,7.2,11.4,13.6,2.8,
"","","","","","",""
"2007Q1",7.3,6.0,9.0,8.6,6.6,
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 20, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 20, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0096. MICAH SCHECTER v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV02749
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14/15D-14(D) OF THE SECURITIES
                              EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     I, Timothy D. Hart, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of First National Master Note Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers
and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the
servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of
Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.
and BNYM (Delaware).
<PAGE>

Dated: March 31, 2009                   /s/ Timothy D. Hart
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Timothy D. Hart, Senior Vice President,
                                        First National Bank of Omaha (senior
                                        officer in charge of the servicing
                                        function of the servicer)

       [Signature page to Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15d-14(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 172 

To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation 

and Development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for 

Economic Co-operation and Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exit the OECD Act 

5 of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR THE 

7 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPER8 ATION AND DEVELOPMENT. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed10 eral funds may be expended to fund activities or projects 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 172 IS

1 undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-oper2 ation and Development. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                
<ARTICLE>                                                            5
                                                                      
<S>                                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                                               $1,204,278
<SECURITIES>                                                         25,715,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         6,134,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             14,564
<INVENTORY>                                                             962,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     34,572,513
<PP&E>                                                               12,348,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        1,439,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       51,872,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 6,118,197
<BONDS>                                                               4,560,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             37,141,872
<OTHER-SE>                                                            3,449,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         51,872,705
<SALES>                                                               5,923,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      8,104,904
<CGS>                                                                 3,162,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         4,230,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     (220,705)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         932,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            286,917
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     645,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            645,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0.09
        
 

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VERONICA ROSIBELLE MENDEZ 

SIBRIAN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71474 

Agency No. A206-269-317 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2019**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Veronica Rosibelle Mendez Sibrian, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her

motion to reconsider and to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71474 

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a 

motion to reconsider or reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th 

Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider

as untimely and because it failed to specify any error in law or fact in the prior 

removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(A), (B); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1), (2).

To the extent the agency construed Mendez Sibrian’s motion to reconsider as a 

motion to reopen, the agency did not abuse its discretion in denying it as untimely 

and for failure to present previously unavailable and material evidence. See 

Mohammed, 400 F.3d at 793 (agency may construe motions based on their 

underlying purpose); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(motion to reopen must generally be filed within ninety days; “[t]he BIA can deny 

a motion to reopen [for] . . . failure to introduce previously unavailable, material 

evidence.” (citation omitted)). The BIA acted within its broad discretion in 

determining that Mendez Sibrian’s evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening 

given the IJ’s underlying adverse credibility determination. Toufighi v. Mukasey,

538 F.3d 988, 996-97 (9th Cir. 2007) (evidence immaterial in light of prior adverse 

credibility determination). 
3 18-71474 

To the extent Mendez Sibrian challenges the IJ’s February 13, 2017 order 

and the denial of her asylum and withholding of removal claims, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider those contentions because the petition for review is not 

timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must 

be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
<PAGE>

                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Washington, D.C.  20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT


                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                      The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)          September 12, 2000
                                                            ------------------

                      FIRST USA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
               (As Successor to First National Bank of Commerce)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

         (As Servicer on behalf of FIRST NBC CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST)

                                 United States
                                 -------------
                (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

                   333-24023                          51-0269396
                  -----------                        ------------
            (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer Identification Number)




 201 North Walnut Street, Wilmington, Delaware                      19801
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                          (Zip Code)


          (302) 594-4117
--------------------------------------------------
Registrant's telephone number, including area code


                                       N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
<PAGE>

Item 7.      Financial Statements and Exhibits

             (c)       Exhibits.


         Exhibit No.      Document Description
         -----------      --------------------

           (20.1)         Monthly Servicer's Certificate, Series 1997-1
           (20.2)         Monthly Holders' Statement, Series 1997-1
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURE



     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                         First USA Bank, National Association, as Servicer, on
                         behalf of FIRST NBC CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST,




                         By:  /s/ Tracie H. Klein
                              ---------------------------
                         Name:   Tracie H. Klein
                         Title:  First Vice President



Date:  September 15, 2000
       ------------------
<PAGE>

                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.    Document Description                          Sequential Page No.
-----------    --------------------                          ------------------
   20.1        Monthly Servicer's Certificate, Series 1997-1          5

   20.2        Monthly Holders' Statement, Series 1997-1             10
EXHIBIT
23.1 - CONSENT OF SCHAUER TAYLOR, P.C.





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report, dated March 17, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Florida Community Banks, Inc. and Subsidiary for the three years
ended December 31, 2007 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and
incorporated herein by reference in the previously filed Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.











/s/ Douglas B. Schauer,
CPA


/s/
Schauer Taylor, P.C.





Birmingham,
Alabama


May 15,
2009
Case 1:11-mj-01165-BNB Document 8 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 06/19/2012 |   |                    |   |
|--------|------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |       |   |                    |   |
|   |       |   | /s/ JOHN R. REGAZZI     |   |
|   |       |   | John R. Regazzi         |   |
|   |       |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To
      the
      Board of Directors and Shareholders of


EAU
      Technologies, Inc.


1890
      Cobb
      International Blvd, Ste. A


Kennesaw,
      GA 30152





As
      independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of our report dated March 24, 2008 (which includes
      an
      emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to
      continue as a going concern), relating to the financial statements of EAU
      Technologies, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and to all
      references to our Firm, included in or made part of this Form 10-KSB, into
      the
      Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos.
      333-148222 and 333-148223).





/s/
      HJ
& Associates, LLC





HJ
&
      Associates, LLC


Salt
      Lake
      City, Utah


March
      24,
      2008
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 3, 2022

No. 04-21-00448-CV

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON,

Appellant

v.

IMPLICITY MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI16323

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to stay this appeal, explaining that the parties 

“have reached a confidential, conditional settlement of this matter.” However, appellant states it 

is unwilling to voluntarily dismiss this appeal at this time, because the settlement is conditional 

and no final settlement agreement has been reached. Thus, appellant requests that this appeal is 

stayed until a final settlement agreement has been reached. We GRANT IN PART AND DENY 

IN PART appellant’s motion. 

This appeal is STAYED until September 2, 2022. We ORDER the parties to file a written 

status of the settlement proceedings on or before September 2, 2022. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-17-00673- CR

Michael Todd E nglert, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 119 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. B -16 -08 24- SB , H ONO RAB LE JAY K . WEATH ERB Y , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Michae l Todd Eng lert was char g ed with ag g rava ted assault with a deadly

wea pon, a second deg ree felony

. Tex. Penal C ode § 22.02(a) (2). Af t er a jury trial, the t rial court rende red a judgme nt of conviction for t h e u n d er ly ing offe nse. The trial court assessed Eng lert’s punishment at eig ht y ear s in the Texas Depar tment of Criminal J ustice-I nstitut ional Division. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concludi n g t h at t h e appea l is frivolous and without merit. The brief m eets the require ments of Anders v. Calif

ornia by p re s en t i n g a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord demonstrating why there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); G a r n e r v . S ta te , 3 0 0 S. W. 3 d 7 6 3 , 7 6 6 ( T e x. Cr im

. A p p . 2 0 0 9 ) ; s e e a ls o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U
. S. 7 5 , 86–87 (1988).Appellant’s c ounsel has repr esente d to the Court tha t he has provided c opies of the

motion and brief to appellant; advised appellant of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ord and file a pro se brief; a

nd provided a

ppellant with a form motion for pro se acce ss to the appellate re cord along with the mailing addre ss of this Court. See Kelly v. Smi t h , 4 3 6 S.W .3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766. Eng lert has not filed a pr o se brief

. We h a v e c o n d u c te d a n in d e p e n d e n

t r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r d , in c lu d in g a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l’ s brief, and find no reve rsible err or. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766; Bledsoe

v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) . We ag ree with counsel that the re cord prese nts no arg uably

meritorious g rounds for r eview a nd the appe al is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted. The judgme nt of conviction is aff irmed.

__________________________________________ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Field Affir med Filed: September

27, 2018 Do Not Publish

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1


Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


June 26, 2000


Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 included in the Form 8-K/A, dated June 26, 2000, of
TurboChef Technologies, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.


Very truly yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




DHM

cc:     Mr. Mark Jacobson
        Interim Chief Financial Officer
        TurboChef Technologies, Inc

        Mr. John Shortley
        Controller
        TurboChef Technologies, Inc.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40915 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.
FELIX OMAR CASTILLO -ANDINO,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16 -CR- 55 -1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Omar Castillo

Andino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 7 38 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo-Andino ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fif h Circuit 

### FILED April 7, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40915 Document: 00513943684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2017No. 16

- 40915

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40915 Document: 00513943684 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2017