alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1488

Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CF-015980-A-O

_____________________________

MICHAEL EAGLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Jenifer M. Harris, Judge.

March 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, WOZNIAK and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Brandon F. Dark, of Law Office of Brandon F. Dark, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133693 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133693 COA: 275833 Oakland CC: 2003-192859-FH ANDREW JOSEPH CASCHERA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 22, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case to the trial court for correction of the presentence report.

p0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2007

Clerk
#### LOCAL NO. 301 OF THE INTERNATIONAL HOD CARRIERS, v. GALLESPIT CONSTR. CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 99.2 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of EZ Travel, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Edward C. Zimmerman, III, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Annual Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
     the Registrant.

/s/ Edward C. Zimmerman, III
----------------------------
    Edward C. Zimmerman, III
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer
    February 25, 2003

<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Ernest William COLEMAN, Debtor. Ernest William COLEMAN, Appellant, v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF LOUISVILLE, Appellee.

No. 7554.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1937.

For opinion .below, see 21 F.Supp. 923.

D. A. Sachs, Jr., of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

J. F. Williamson and John S. Grimes, both of Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before HICKS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and NEVIN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a consideration of the facts as disclosed by the record in this case, this court is of opinion that the District Court was correct in finding (1) “Subsection (s) does not authorize the court to grant an extension of time arbitrarily”; (2) “The debtor’s offer of composition and extension was not made in good faith as that term is used in the statute”; and that the court did not err in its order dismissing the petition of petitioner in that court, appellant here. In re Borgelt, 7 Cir., 79 F.2d 929; Steverson v. Clark, 4 Cir., 86 F.2d 330; In re Reichert, D.C., 13 F.Supp. 1, 4, 5; In re Schaeffer, D.C., 14 F.Supp. 807; In re Byrd, D.C., 15 F.Supp. 453; In re Wylie, D.C., 16 F.Supp. 193, 194. All, among others, cited in footnote 6, in Wright v. Vinton Mountain Trust Bank, 300 U.S. 440, 462-463, 57 S.Ct. 556, 562, 81 L.Ed. 736.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.
#### STORY-BLOW LBR. CO. et al. v. W. S. STORY.

3 Div. 113.

Supreme Court of Alabama.,

May 7, 1935.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                     
     See Accompanying notes
     $ in thousands, except per share data          
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CIK>                         0000768384
<NAME>                        Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-27-1999
<CASH>                                         13363
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22549
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    17347
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               88781
<PP&E>                                         64012
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41751
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       245
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158141
<SALES>                                        50066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          31977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (398)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1841
<INCOME-TAX>                                   644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .16
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-12-1998
<CASH>                                         115,527
<SECURITIES>                                     7,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,681
<PP&E>                                         294,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                 156,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,255
<SALES>                                        174,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,727
<CGS>                                           36,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,009
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (822)
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.600
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.590
        

</TABLE>
S. 1537

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To authorize the transfer of certain funds from the Senate Gift Shop Revolving 

Fund to the Senate Employee Child Care Center.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TRANSFERS FROM SENATE GIFT SHOP REVOLVING FUND. 

Section 2(c) of Public Law 102–392 (2 U.S.C. 121d(c)) is 

amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(3) The Secretary of the Senate may transfer from the fund 

to the Senate Employee Child Care Center proceeds from the sale 

of holiday ornaments by the Senate Gift Shop for the purpose 

of funding necessary activities and expenses of the Center, including 

scholarships, educational supplies, and equipment.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### BRADY v. PAHOKEE DRAINAGE DISTRICT and Florida Industrial Commission.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.48

                       [STONEHOUSE GRAPHICS LETTERHEAD]


                                                                  29 March 2000


Colorsmart.com
Fax 021 461 2287

Attention Reg Burrows.

Dear Reg,

I am prepared to extend the date of the agreement to the 15th May 2000,
notwithstanding that Stonehouse Graphics is an ongoing business and decisions
are being made on a daily basis. That Colorsmart.com will accept the results
of these decisions.

Regards,


/s/ Nolan Weight
Nolan Weight.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 USC. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; NIDA-K Conflicts SEP.
    Date: November 5, 2008.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Kristen V. Huntley, PhD. Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-435-1433, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8598839981889486ad808c8481c3838485c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb5a8b3a9b1b8a4b69db0bcb4b1f3b3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Conference Grant Application Review.
    Date: December 5, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mark R. Green, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1431, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b060c190e0e055a2b05020f0a45050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ae7edf8efefe4bbcae4e3eeeba4e4e3e2a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 8, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-24446 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 12
 Sybase, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands, except for ratios)
(Full year for all periods except for three months March 31, 2008)
 ThreemonthsendedMarch 31,2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004Earnings:Income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of an
accounting change
    
    $
    39,670
    
    
    $
    189,952
    
    
    $
    161,317
    
    
    $
    136,714
    
    
    $
    100,966Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    5,535
    
    
    
    21,969
    
    
    
    21,699
    
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988Total Earnings, as defined
    
    
    45,205
    
    
    
    211,921
    
    
    
    183,016
    
    
    
    156,947
    
    
    
    112,954Fixed ChargesInterest Expense
    
    
    2,377
    
    
    
    9,663
    
    
    
    9,516
    
    
    
    8,116
    
    
    
    308Amortization of debt expense
    
    
    492
    
    
    
    1,969
    
    
    
    1,969
    
    
    
    1,671
    
    
    
    Estimated interest portion
on rental expense
    
    
    2,666
    
    
    
    10,337
    
    
    
    10,214
    
    
    
    10,446
    
    
    
    11,680Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    5,535
    
    
    
    21,969
    
    
    
    21,699
    
    
    
    20,233
    
    
    
    11,988Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    8.2
    
    
    
    9.6
    
    
    
    8.4
    
    
    
    7.8
    
    
    
    9.4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7042

ROBERT EARL BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE HAMPTON, Warden; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-94-1113-18AJ)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel,

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Hampton,

No. CA-94-1113-18AJ (D.S.C. May 30, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 6, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.215 Bank Loans Not Elsewhere Classified** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
f8k050914ex10ii_profitplan.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


EXHIBIT B


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 







 



	$ 72,000.00	 Dated: May 7, 2014





 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Organic Innovations, a Nevada corporation ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Organic Innovations, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and wholly-owned subsidiary of Profit Planners Management, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Holder") the principal sum of Seventy Two Thousand Dollars ($72,000.00) together with interest on unpaid principal outstanding, computed from the date of this Note, at the rate provided herein.







1.           Commencing on the date of this Note, the unpaid principal balance outstanding under this Note shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.  The entire amount of principal and any accrued but unpaid interest and all other amounts due under this Note shall be due and payable in full on the first anniversary of the date of this Note (the “Maturity Date”).







2.           All parties waive presentment for payment, demand, protest, notice of non-payment, and consent to any and all renewals, extensions and modifications which may be granted by Holder from time to time.







3.           If any suit or action is instituted to enforce this Note, Maker promises to pay, in addition to the costs and disbursements otherwise allowed by law, such amount or amounts as the court may adjudge as attorneys' fees in such suit or action.







4.           Maker shall have the right to prepay all or any part of the principal balance of this Note without penalty prior to the Maturity Date.







5.           The terms of this Note shall apply to, and inure to the benefit of, and bind all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, personal representative, successors and assigns.







6.           No delay or omission on the part of Holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such right or of any other right under this Note.  A waiver on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to or waiver of any such right and/or remedy on any future occasion.







7.           This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with California law.


 




	 	
Organic Innovations, 


A Nevada Corporation


	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Maribel Garcia
	 	 	Maribel Garcia, CEO
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive
Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      HickoryTech.











/s/ John W.
Finke____________


John W.
Finke


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 5,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6280

JAMES SNEAD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98-

2156-L)

Submitted: July 30, 1999 Decided: August 30, 1999

Before ERVIN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Snead, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the order from which Snead appeals was filed on

February 3, 1999, it was entered on the district court’s docket

sheet on February 4, 1999. February 4, 1999, is therefore the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

James Snead appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Snead v. Corcoran, No. CA-98-2156-L (D.

Md. Feb. 4, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### Donald R. JAGGERS, Petitioner, v. George B. RYAN, Judge, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 17, 1971.

Alan N. Leibson, Louisville, for petitioner.

Ernest H. Clarke, Stites & McElwain, Louisville, for respondent.

GARDNER, Commissioner.

Petitioner, Donald R. Jaggers, seeks a writ of mandamus to require the circuit *86judge to expunge from the record the notice of appeal and the designátion of record.

Judgment was entered on May 27, 1971, in favor of Jaggers in an action in the Jefferson Circuit Court between Donald R. Jaggers, plaintiff, and Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District, defendant. On June 21, 1971, an order was entered overruling defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On August 20, 1971, more than 30 days after entry of the order overruling defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, defendant filed a motion to correct the record and to permit it to file a notice of appeal and a designation of record to be effective as of July 16, 1971. Pursuant to a hearing on affidavits the respondent judge decided the original notice of appeal and designation of record, in fact, had been filed within the 30-day period and had been misplaced by someone in the clerk’s office. An order was entered supplying the record with a notice of appeal and a designation of record as of July 16, 1971.

This original proceeding seeks extraordinary relief, which is only granted by this court under unusual circumstances when it is apparent that a great injustice and irreparable injury will result to an applicant who has no adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise. Barker v. Breslin, Ky., 329 S.W.2d 578 (1959). Jaggers states that his reason for asking for the writ of mandamus is that if it is denied he will incur extensive and unnecessary costs in defending the case on appeal. We have held this was insufficient ground for granting the extraordinary relief asked for. See Barker v. Breslin, supra.

Petition for mandamus denied.

All concur.