alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-0429-RBJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

JOHN DOE, aka FARKHAD K. SHARIPOV,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL, DATES AND DEADLINES

This matter has been scheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A702, 7th Floor, 

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence December 19, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. It is 

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by November 11, 2011and responses 

to these motions shall be filed by November 25, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall be made 

no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such 

experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made one week 

after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such experts shall be made no 

later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is further 

ORDERED that counsel shall jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-

4694 or by email at Jackson_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov within five days after filing of pretrial motions to set the case for Motions Hearing. It is further

Case 1:11-cr-00429-RBJ Document 12 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is scheduled for December 9, 2011 at 

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A702. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to address: jury 

instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, stipulations as 

to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

If the parties reach a disposition, the Trial Preparation Conference will be converted to a 

Change of Plea Hearing. The deadline for submitting the plea agreement and statement of facts 

relevant to sentencing and the statement by defendant in advance of plea of guilty will be 48 

hours prior to the Change of Plea Hearing.

DATED this 28th day of October , 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00429-RBJ Document 12 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1776** 

In re: MAURICE PARKER , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:16

- hc

- 02078

- BO )

Submitted : December 12, 2016 Decided: January 5, 2017

Before SHEDD and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Maurice Parker , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Maurice Parker petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court judge to order the North Carolina Attorney General to investigate Parker’s claim of actual innocence . We conclude that Pa rker is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamu s relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Mandamus “has traditionally been used in the federal courts only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribe d jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.” Moussaoui , 333 F.3d at 516 (internal quotation marks omitted). The relief sought by Parker is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mat erials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1772

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 127 South Elm Street in Gardner, Kansas, 

as the ‘‘Private First Class Shane R. Austin Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1772 ES

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS SHANE R. AUSTIN POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 127 South Elm Street in Gard5 ner, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Pri6 vate First Class Shane R. Austin Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

11 Shane R. Austin Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate August 3, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1772

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostShane R. Austin Post Office’’. Gardner, Kansas, as the ‘‘Private First Class al Service located at 127 South Elm Street in
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND
RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 19, 2009 | /s/
      Lutz Klingmann                                         
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Lutz Klingmann                                                   
|                    | Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (08-074)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A patent application on the invention listed below assigned to 
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, has been filed in 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and is available for 
licensing.

DATES: October 9, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Heald, Patent Counsel, Kennedy 
Space Center, Mail Code CC-A, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899; telephone 
(321) 867-7214; fax (321) 867-1817.
    NASA Case No. KSC-12909: Repair Procedure Development System.

    Dated: October 3, 2008.
Michael C. Wholley,
General Counsel.
 [FR Doc. E8-24035 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41536

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN MANUEL LOPEZ-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-02-CR-446-1

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Juan Manuel Lopez-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate

offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged

in his indictment. Lopez maintains that he pleaded guilty to
No. 02-41536

-2-

an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year

maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that

offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.18
                                  News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


Voice Mobility International, Inc. Names James Hewett as Chief Financial Officer

VANCOUVER, May 15, 2000 -- Voice Mobility International, Inc. (OTCBB: VMII), an
innovative developer of Internet-based unified communications software, today
announced the appointment of James Hewett, C.A., as Chief Financial Officer for
the Company.

Prior to joining Voice Mobility, Mr. Hewett was Vice President, Finance and
Administration for Steels Industrial Products Ltd. From 1997 to 1999, he served
as Chief Financial Officer with Nice Systems Canada Ltd., a computer telephony
interface provider of call logging and quality performance products for call
centers. In 1997 Nice Systems acquired Dees Communications Ltd., a developer of
telephony hardware products and software products used for quality improvements
in call centers. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Hewett served as Chief Financial Officer
with Dees Communications Ltd. Mr. Hewett received his Bachelor of Science from
the University of British Columbia and is a member of the British Columbia
Institute of Chartered Accountants.

 "I am pleased Jim has agreed to join our team," commented Tom O'Flaherty,
President of Voice Mobility International, Inc. "He brings a wealth of
corporate, financial and operational experience to our senior management team as
well as an understanding of the telecommunications and software business which
will serve us well in the operational management of the company as it continues
to grow," he added.

For further information:
Jay Hutton, Chief Executive Officer, Voice Mobility International, Inc.
604-482-0000
www.voicemobility.com

MEDIA CONTACT
Roger Noujeim
Carly Hutchinson
National Public Relations
604-684-6655
RNOUJEIM@NATIONAL.CA
CHUTCHINSON@NATIONAL.CA

Maxine Barnes
United Kingdom: 0207-251-1385
maxinebarnes@msn.com

INVESTOR RELATIONS
North America: 1-888-370-8751
Investors@voicemobility.com
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1757 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent certain 

authorities for veterans’ benefits, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2007 

Mr. AKAKA (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make 

permanent certain authorities for veterans’ benefits, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCES TO TITLE 38, 

4 UNITED STATES CODE. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

6 ‘‘Veterans’ Authorities Expansion Act of 2007’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Except as otherwise expressly 

8 provided, whenever in this Act an amendment or repeal 

9 is expressed in terms of an amendment or repeal to a sec10 tion or other provision, the reference shall be considered 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S 1757 IS

1 to be made to a section or other provision of title 38, 

2 United States Code. 

3 SEC. 2. PERMANENT TREATMENT AUTHORITY FOR PAR4 TICIPANTS IN DOD CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGI5 CAL TESTING CONDUCTED BY DESERET TEST 

6 CENTER (INCLUDING PROJECT SHIPBOARD 

7 HAZARD AND DEFENSE). 

8 Section 1710(e)(3) is amended— 

9 (1) in clause (B), by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the 

10 semicolon; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of clause (C) 

12 and all that follows before the period at the end of 

13 paragraph (3). 

14 SEC. 3. PERMANENT AND RETROACTIVE AUTHORITY FOR 

15 VA TO FURNISH GOVERNMENT HEADSTONES 

16 OR MARKERS FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS IN 

17 PRIVATE CEMETERIES. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2306 is amended— 

19 (1) by striking paragraph (d)(3); and 

20 (2) by re-designating paragraph (d)(4) as para21 graph (d)(3). 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of section 

23 2306(d) of title 38, United States Code, as amended by 

24 this Act, apply to a veteran who died on or after November 

25 1, 1990. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

S 1757 IS

1 SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF INCREASE IN BENEFIT FOR INDIVID2 UALS PURSUING APPRENTICESHIP OR ON3 THE-JOB TRAINING. 

4 Section 103 of the Veterans Benefits Improvement 

5 Act of 2004 (Public Law No. 108–454; 118 Stat. 3600), 

6 as amended, is amended by striking ‘‘2008’’ each place 

7 it appears and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

8 SEC. 5. EXTENSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE. 

9 Section 3485(a)(4) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 

10 2007’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

11 2010’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### BELL v. DEWITT et al.

No. 2829.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1946.

For former opinion, see 27 So.2d 433.

Reid & Reid, of Hammond, for appellant.

Mary Purser, of Amite, and Benj. W. Miller, of Bogalusa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant, in his application for rehearing, contends that we erred in three particulars, to-wit: 1. In holding that the timber had not been cut by the Lake Superior Piling Company about 1912. 2. In holding that the hardwood timber was merchantable on June 20, 1902, the date of sale from Richard Brown to William L. Jay. 3. In not sustaining the plea of prescription of one year against the claim of the Lake Superior Piling Company.

As to the first two contentions, after a careful review of the record, we find no error committed by us.

*925As to the third contention, after a careful search of the record we fail to find wherein the plaintiff filed such a plea. Naturally, we did not and could not consider such a plea. The plea of prescription must be specially pleaded and the plea cannot be supplied, ex officio, by the Court.

Rehearing refused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRIGHT HORIZONS, INC. AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,547,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,404,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   338,209
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,660,078
<PP&E>                                      19,474,401
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,995,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,368,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,406,590
<BONDS>                                      3,861,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       19,979,068
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,805
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,537,146)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,368,975
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,168,057
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,818,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              86,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                534,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            314,027
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   314,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
#### Zell LANIER (now Zell Barwick), Appellant, v. J. S. LANIER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

July 13, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00391-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL CANTER,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This will confirm that, due to a conflict in the Court’s schedule, the probation

revocation hearing regarding Defendant Canter set Monday, March 4, 2013 is VACATED

and RESET for Tuesday, March 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom C-401, Byron G.

Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Defendant must

be present.

Dated: March 1, 2013

Case 1:11-cr-00391-LTB Document 67 Filed 03/01/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.116 Property-Casualty Insurance Companies** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02357-WYD-MEH

CS CAPITAL CORP., d/b/a THE INVOICE BANKERS CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOCAL SENIOR SERVICES, 

RANDY KALANI FAHILGA, and

ILD CORP. f/k/a ILD Telecommunications, Inc., 

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 9, 2012.

Plaintiff’s (Partially Unopposed) Motion to Amend Caption [filed May 7, 2012; docket #40]

is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption as follows: Defendant ILD shall

be referred to as “ILD Corp. f/k/a ILD Telecommunications, Inc.” 

Case 1:11-cv-02357-WYD-MEH Document 42 Filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### J. H. NIPPER, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 18, 1936.

Otis R. Parker and Alto Adams, both of Fort Pierce, for plaintiff in error.

Cary D. Landis, Atty. Gen., Roy Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Angus Sumner, State Atty., of Fort Pierce, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the entire record in this cause, we are convinced that the ends of justice require a new trial. So the judgment of the circuit court is hereby reversed. See Coker v. State, 83 Fla. 672, 673, 93 So. 176; Howell v. State, 121 Fla. 327, 163 So. 691; Woodward v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 So. 509; Pass v. State, 121 Fla. 336, 163 So. 583; Davis v. State, 76 Fla. 179, 79 So. 450.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00434-RBJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JAN MICHAEL PHILLIPS

Defendant.

 

ORDER 

 

ORDERED: 

Pursuant to Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(i), counsel for the government may disclose preliminarily to 

the trial in this case, the transcript of the testimony and exhibits of any grand jury witness that 

the government may call at trial under the following conditions:

1.) There shall be no reproduction or dissemination of the material by the defendant or by 

defense counsel.

2.) The grand jury material shall be retained in the custody of the office of the attorney 

for the defendant.

3.) The grand jury material provided by the government shall be returned to the 

government at the conclusion of this case or pending further order of the Court.

4.) That disclosure of the grand jury matter is limited to the defendant and to counsel 

appearing for the defendant in this case and the material is to be used only for this case.
DATED this 21st day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 

R. BROOKE JACKSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

I
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136616 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### SHELBY TOWN CENTER I, L.L.C., Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices 

### Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136616 COA: 273689 Macomb CC: 2 004-001323-CZ GORMAN'S LAKESIDE, L.L.C. and GORMAN'S FURNITURE, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 6, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk