alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0405 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NATHAN BRYCE HARDIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including December 10, 202 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0405
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancer Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Freitas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|June 28, 2004 |  | /s/MARK L. FREITASMark L. Freitas,
Chief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000766004
<NAME>                        Sbarro, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     usd

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-25-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         146072
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3271
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2885
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156546
<PP&E>                                         309279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29071
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       205
<OTHER-SE>                                     263671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301990
<SALES>                                        100354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104451
<CGS>                                          20964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  49067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11149
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6912
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .34



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1559

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
    reauthorize the provision of telemedicine and distance learning 
                        services in rural areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2007

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
    reauthorize the provision of telemedicine and distance learning 
                        services in rural areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TELEMEDICINE AND DISTANCE LEARNING SERVICES IN RURAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2335A of the Food, Agriculture, 
Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 950aaa-5) is amended by 
striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2012''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1(b) of Public Law 102-551 (7 
U.S.C. 950aaa note) is amended by striking ``2007'' and inserting 
``2012''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02357-WYD-MEH

CS CAPITAL CORP., d/b/a THE INVOICE BANKERS CORP.,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOCAL SENIOR SERVICES, and

RANDY KALANI FAHILGA,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 31, 2012.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and File First Amended Complaint [filed January 31, 2012;

docket #27] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The

Court reminds the parties that it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has

conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo.

LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state in the motion,

or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule...” Id. 

Case 1:11-cv-02357-WYD-MEH Document 29 Filed 01/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02681-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02681-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02681-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02681-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Visitors of the Marine Corps University (BOV MCU) will meet to review, develop and provide recommendations on all aspects of the academic and administrative policies of the University; examine all aspects of professional military education operations; and provide such oversight and advice, as is necessary, to facilitate high educational standards and cost effective operations. The Board will be focusing primarily on the growth of Marine Corps University with a view to the future. All sessions of the meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, November 13, 2008 from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and on Friday, November 14, 2008 from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Marine Corps University's Gray Research Center. The address is: 2040 Broadway Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mary Lanzillotta, Executive Secretary, Marine Corps University Board of Visitors, 2076 South Street, Quantico, Virginia 22134,                         *telephone:*                         703-784-4037.                    

Dated: October 3, 2008.

T. M. Cruz,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-24247 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 17, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.218 Home Mortgages1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtis Smith, Appellant.

*Pro se*motion by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this court dated April 20, 1987, which determined an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered April 13, 1983.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto it is,

Ordered that the motion is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer
     of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the Annual  Report of the Fund on Form 10K for the year ended  December 31,
     2003 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  March 15, 2004

                                        /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                        -----------------------
                                        Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1785 

To amend the Clean Air Act to establish deadlines by which the Administrator 

of the Environmental Protection Agency shall issue a decision on whether 

to grant certain waivers of preemption under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2007 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to establish deadlines by which 

the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall issue a decision on whether to grant certain 

waivers of preemption under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVERS OF PREEMPTION. 

4 Section 209 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7543) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f) WAIVERS OF PREEMPTION.— 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 1785 IS

1 ‘‘(1) PENDING REQUESTS.—Not later than 30 

2 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, 

3 but in no case later than September 30, 2007, the 

4 Administrator shall issue to the Governor of each 

5 applicable State a decision on each request for a 

6 waiver of preemption under subsection (b) that— 

7 ‘‘(A) has been submitted by the State; and 

8 ‘‘(B) is pending as of the date of enact9 ment of this subsection. 

10 ‘‘(2) SUBSEQUENT REQUESTS.—With respect to 

11 a request for a waiver of preemption under sub12 section (b) (including such a request submitted by a 

13 State that has adopted and enforced certain stand14 ards as described in section 177) that is submitted 

15 by a State after the date of enactment of this sub16 section, not later than 180 days after the date on 

17 which the Administrator receives the request, the 

18 Administrator shall issue to the Governor of the 

19 State a decision on whether to grant the waiver.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02650-RBJ-BNB

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY as subrogee of Chet Hayes,

CHET HAYES, an individual, and

TANYA HAYES, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE INTERMOUNTAIN RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

I am informed that this case has been resolved. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that on or before May 17, 2012, the parties shall file a stipulation or

motion to dismiss with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

Dated May 4, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02650-RBJ-BNB Document 36 Filed 05/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### BANK OF UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. James M. CHRISTIAN, Bankrupt, Appellee.

No. 6539.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. *4,*1938.

McDermott, Enright *&*Carpenter, of Jersey City, N. J. (James D. Carpenter, Jr., and Charles B. Collins, both of Jersey City, N. J., of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas L. Zimmerman, Jr., of Ridge-wood, N. J., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and WATSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the referee filed a report which found the specifications to objections to discharge of the bankrupt were unfounded. Subsequently exceptions to this report were overruled by the court and the bankrupt was granted a discharge. Thereupon the objecting creditor took this appeal.

The case is wholly one of fact, and, in the face of the finding by the referee and the court below, we find no warrant for holding the court in error in granting the bankrupt’s discharge. So regarding, the bill is dismissed and the decree below js affirmed,
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1781 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1781

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Buck Owens 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2007

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, as the ``Buck Owens 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUCK OWENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 118 Minner Avenue in Bakersfield, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Buck Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Buck Owens 
Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended  October 9, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Anthony J.
Puglisi, Vice President-Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


Date: November 21, 2005


/s/ Anthony J. Puglisi
-----------------------------
Anthony J. Puglisi
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

NOTE: A signed original of this  certification  has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BÁSICO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - SABESP (the Company) on Form 20 F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gesner José de Oliveira Filho, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: July 15, 2010 By:
     /s/ Gesner José de Oliveira FilhoName:
Title:
     Gesner José de Oliveira Filho
Chief Executive Officer


---
1

 “[#42]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02663-REB-MEH

DEMPSEY ALEXANDER KENNEDY, and

CRYSTAL PHIFER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Tennessee corporation, and

TAMMY MOSNESS, an individual,

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the recommendation to continue the trial in this matter

contained in the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#42]1 filed

June 29, 2012. No objection having been filed, I review the recommendation for plain

error only. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418

F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge’s

recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be

approved and adopted.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#42], filed June

29, 2012, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

Case 1:11-cv-02663-REB-MEH Document 48 Filed 08/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference, currently scheduled for Friday,

November 2, 2012, at 3:30 p.m., and the trial, currently scheduled to commence on

November 19, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., are VACATED and CONTINUED pending further

order of the court; and

3. That the Trial Preparation Conference and trial SHALL BE RESET during a

telephonic setting conference on August 15, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. (MDT); provided,

furthermore, that counsel for plaintiffs SHALL ARRANGE and COORDINATE

the conference call necessary to facilitate the setting conference.

Dated August 9, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02663-REB-MEH Document 48 Filed 08/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2