alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sbarro, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carolyn M. Spatafora, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2010                                               
|                                                                    
|/s/ Carolyn M. Spatafora                                            
|Carolyn M. Spatafora                                                
|Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                             26
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,670
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,703
<PP&E>                         49,659
<DEPRECIATION>                (33,488)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 17,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           6,820
<BONDS>                             0 
<COMMON>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<OTHER-SE>                        515  <F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   17,874
<SALES>                         3,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,233
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   615 
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                      615 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.517 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.517 <F2>
<FN>
<F1> Partner equity - 1,190 Partnership units outstanding.
<F2> Per Partnership Unit in thousands.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.1 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB**

**FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA**

Date: March 29, 2016 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of First National Bank of Omaha (the “Servicer”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB and Section 3.05(a) of the First Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofDecember 20, 2012, among First National Funding LLC, as Transferor, First National Bank of Omaha, as Servicer, and First National Master Note Trust, as Issuer (the “Transfer and Servicing Agreement”), does hereby certify that: 

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) and ofits performance under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and 

2. To the best of my knowledge, basedon my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this Servicer Compliance Statement the day and year firstwritten above. 

 
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, as ServicerBy 
/s/ Timothy D. Hart
 Timothy D. Hart Senior Vice President
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellant, v. Ronald Luke WALLACE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 6, 1972.

Ed W. Hancock, Atty. Gen., John C. Ryan, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for appellant.

J. Calvin Aker, Somerset, for appellee.

EDWARD P. HILL, Jr., Justice.

By this appeal the Commonwealth of Kentucky seeks a certification of the law.

The appellee was, by separate indictments, charged with knowingly receiving stolen property (KRS 433.290) and breaking into and entering the storehouse of another (KRS 433.190). The Commonwealth elected to and tried the appellee under the indictment charging that he knowingly received stolen property.

At the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s evidence, the trial judge directed a verdict of acquittal on the belief that the evidence tended to show that the appellee actually broke into the store building and stole the property involved. The trial court was of the opinion that the appellee was tried under the wrong indictment.

The Commonwealth takes the position on this appeal that the appellee was properly tried under the proper indictment and that the evidence was sufficient to prove the crime of knowingly receiving stolen property, and we agree.

The statute (KRS 433.290) specifically states that “the possession by any person of any stolen property shall be prima facie evidence of his guilt under this section.”

We conclude that the trial court was in error in directing a verdict of acquittal.

We have certified the law in this case conscious of the fact in so doing that the verdict and judgment of acquittal cannot be disturbed in felony cases. Commonwealth v. Mullins, Ky., 405 S.W.2d 28 (1966), and Commonwealth v. Allen, Ky., 441 S.W.2d 424 (1969). It is only in misdemeanor cases where the punishment is by fine alone that the Commonwealth may have the law certified and a reversal for a new trial. KRS 21.140(3) and Commonwealth v. Devine, Ky., 396 S.W.2d 60 (1965).

Wherefore the law in the instant case is so certified.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.











/s/ David A. Christensen


David A. Christensen


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


October 26, 2010
ex10-50.htm



EXHIBIT 10.50




 



PROMISSORY NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 




	$30,000.00 	April 30, 2014







 


For value received, Guardian 8 Holdings, a Nevada corporation (the “Maker”) promised to pay to James G. Miller, or its registered assigns or successors in interest (the “Holder”) the Principal Amount and Interest (both as defined below) in the manner and upon the terms and conditions as set forth in that Term Note (“Note”) in the sum of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00), dated September 19, 2013, which Note becomes due and payable on or about April 30, 2014.







By execution by the parties herein, this Promissory Note Extension Agreement extends the Maturity Date of the Note to and including July 15, 2014. All terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same other than the Maturity Date.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have caused this Promissory Note Extension Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.







“Maker”


Guardian 8 Holdings


a Nevada corporation

















By: /s/ C. Stephen Cochennet                                                                          


                                                                       C. Stephen Cochennet, Chief Executive Officer







“Holder”






















/s/ James G. Miller                                                               


James G. Miller
EXHIBIT
10.12
  AMENDMENT
OF PLATINUM UNDERWRITERS REINSURANCE, INC.
 EXECUTIVE
RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN (EXCESS PLAN)
  On
October 22, 2008, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Platinum Underwriters
Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) approved the amendment of the Platinum
Underwriters Reinsurance, Inc. Executive Retirement Savings Plan (the “Excess
Plan”) as a result of the adoption of Section 457A of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  In accordance with Section
457A of the Code, these amendments are intended to eliminate the deferral of
income tax on compensation for services performed after December 31, 2008 by any
employee of the Company or Platinum Underwriters Bermuda, Ltd. (“Platinum
Bermuda”) who is a taxpayer in the United States of America (a “U.S.
Taxpayer”).
 
 The
Excess Plan was amended to provide that any participant in the Excess Plan who
is employed by the Company or Platinum Bermuda and is a U.S. Taxpayer shall not
be eligible to participate, and shall not be a participant, in the Excess Plan
for any periods after December 31, 2008, with the result being that such U.S.
Taxpayer shall not be entitled to any matching offset contributions or any
discretionary employer contributions made by such U.S. Taxpayer’s Employer (as
defined in the Excess Plan) under the Excess Plan in respect of any periods
after December 31, 2008.  For the avoidance of doubt, the matching
offset contribution in respect of the fourth calendar quarter of 2008 shall, and
any discretionary employer contribution in respect of the 2008 Plan Year (as
defined in the Excess Plan) may, be credited to such U.S. Taxpayer’s account in
2009.
 
 The Board
also authorized the officers of the Company to take all necessary action so
that, in accordance with the provisions of Section 457A of the Code, all amounts
under the Excess Plan payable to a U.S. Taxpayer are includible in gross income
by such U.S. Taxpayer no later than the last taxable year beginning before
2018.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00515

- CV

SOUTHCROSS ENERGY PARTNERS GP, LLC

. ,

Appellant

v.

Ivy GONZALEZ on Behalf of M.R. Gonzalez, M.N. Gonzalez, Minor Children, and the Estate

of Jesus Gon zalez, Jr.; Amy and Jesus Gonzalez, Sr.; and Rene Elizondo, Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 16

- 139 Honorable Sandra L. Watts, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A notice of bankruptcy has been filed, showing a party to this appeal is in bankruptcy. The notice also states the court in which the bankruptcy proceeding is pending, the bankruptcy proceeding’s style and case number, and the date when the bankruptcy petition was filed.

The court takes no action on the filing. We order the appeal abated and removed from the court’s active docket. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2; 4th Tex. App. (San Antonio) Loc. R. 4. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being re

- urged in the event the case is reinstated. The appeal will be reinstated only upon proper motion and proof. See Tex

. R. App. P. 8.3(a).

We further order the clerk of this court to send copies of this order to the trial court clerk, the court reporter, and the attorneys of record.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Golf Two, Inc. a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
David Bennett, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golf Two, Inc., and will be retained by Golf Two, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David Bennett
--------------------------
David Bennett
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
April 7, 2004
**Exhibit
      32.2**





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION*





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Rurban Financial Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Duane
      L. Sinn, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
                  Duane L. Sinn
            *Print
                Name: Duane L. Sinn
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
              Date:
                May 13, 2008




*
      This
      certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section
      1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be
      deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed
      to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
      specifically incorporates it by reference into any such filing.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Asia Global Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and the
information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Asia Global Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Asia Global Holdings Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Date:
      February 18, 2010
                /s/
      Mr. Ping-Shun LaiMr.
      Ping-Shun Lai, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00852

- CV
IN RE Abe Ray HERRERA From the 81st Judicial District Court , Wilson County, Texas Trial Court No. CRW2006147 Honorable Russell Wilson , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On December 19 , 2022, Appellant Abe Ray Herrera , representing himself, filed a notice of appeal. On December 30 , 2022, we adv ised Appellant that t he clerk’s record does not contain an appealable judgment or order. See Queen v. State , 212 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2006, no pet.) (citing Glover v. State , No. 12

- 05

- 00189

- CR, 2005 WL 1538228, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Tyler June 30, 2005, no pet.) )

. We explained that “ claims such as [his] would seem more properly brought by way of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. ” Queen , 212 S.W.3d at 623 (citing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.01 ). But “ even if we could interpret his claims as seeking extraordinary relief, we lack original jurisdiction over petitions for writ of habeas corpus, which must be brought in the court of criminal appeals, district courts, or county courts. ” Id . (citing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.05 ). We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing by January04

- 22

- 00852

- CV

- 2

- 16 , 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. On January 9, 2023, Appellant responded with a copy of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. As previously noted, “ we l ack original jurisdiction over petitions for writ of habeas corpus, which must be brought in the court of criminal appeals, district courts, or county courts. ” Id . (citing T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. A

NN . art. 11.05 ). Accordingly, we dismiss Appellant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction without prejudice to future appe als.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY BRACKETS,
HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
AMENDED.


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.124

                          FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

        This is the fourth amendment to the Research Collaboration and License
Agreement between MERCK & CO., INC., a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of New Jersey ("MERCK") and ARRIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, now known as Axys
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("AXYS") made as of November 6, 1996 (the "Agreement").
The purpose of this fourth amendment is to increase the number of FTEs for the
period March 5, 2000 through November 5, 2000.

        1. In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 and Section 5.2(d)
of the Agreement and subject to MERCK's right to terminate the Research Program
and the Agreement in accordance with Section 8.2, the parties agree that [ * ]
FTE's will be required during the period March 5, 2000 through November 5, 2000
payable at an annual rate of [ * ] per FTE.

        2. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have
the respective meanings set forth in the Agreement. The Agreement, together with
the first amendment dated November 18, 1999, and this fourth amendment contain
the entire understanding of the parties with respect to their subject matter.
All express or implied agreements and understandings, either oral or written,
heretofore made are expressly merged in and made a part of the Agreement as
amended by the first, second, third and fourth amendments. All other terms and
conditions of the Agreement, as amended, continue in full force and effect. The
Agreement and its amendments may be amended, or any term thereof modified, only
by a written instrument duly executed by both parties hereto.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of
March 3, 2000.

MERCK & CO., INC.                           AXYS PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.



By: /s/ Mervyn Turner                       By: /s/ Michael Venuti  3/15/00
   --------------------------------            ---------------------------------


[ * ] = CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY
BRACKETS, HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS
AMENDED.


                                       1.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of SouthwestCasino Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James B. Druck, Chief Executive Officer of Southwest CasinoCorporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofSouthwest Casino Corporation.

 
|   | /s/ James B. Druck                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James B. Druck                                         |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer (principal executive officer) |

** **

** **

** **

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 31, 2008

 

----
#### Dwight D. JONES, Appellant, v. COSMOPOLITAN GUARANTEE BUILDING & LOAN ASS’N et al., Appellees.

No. 8540.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1938.

W. B. Chaplin, R. L. Miller, and Fred Lake, all of Oakland, Cal., for appellant.

Tinning & DeLap of Martinez, Cal., and McKee, Tasheira & Wahrhaftig and Ridley D. Stone, Jr., all of Oakland, Cal., for appellees.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and briefs, and of oral argument of counsel, ordered order of District Court affirmed, and that a decree be filed and entered accordingly; mandate of this court to issue in 3Ó days.