alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1699
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               67
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    28
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       20
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    65
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (57)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (57)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (57)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)
        

</TABLE>
35.00
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves
a pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    142.50
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves
a pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    1,000,00057.50
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves
a pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    2,000,00085.83
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves
a pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    3,000,00099.17
    %
    
    of your cumulative salary if the company achieves
a pre-tax profit of
    
    $
    4,000,000
    Sincerely,/s/ Timothy Finley

Timothy FinleyChairman, Compensation Committee
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent *v.*Bernard R. Mendelow, Appellant.

County Court, Nassau County,

May 6, 1957.

*Bofhfeld ■& Sutter*for appellant.

*Frank A. Gulotta, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Cyril J. Brown, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Nassau County District Court for a violation of section 56 (subd. 2, par [b]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York (exceeding the 15-mile-an-hour speed limit while passing a school building). After trial the defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50, which fine was paid.

Subdivision 2 of section 56 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law provides :

“A rate of speed by a motor vehicle or a motor cycle in excess of the maximum limits hereinafter in this subdivision provided shall be unlawful: * * *

(b) Fifteen miles an hour speed limit: All motor vehicles and motor cycles, except those restricted by this section to lower maximum speeds, when passing a school building during the *661school noon hour, school recess, or while children are going to or leaving school during opening or closing hours.”

A reading of that statute indicates that an essential element of a violation is that it occur during one of the times designated in the statute. The record discloses no evidence binding on this defendant that the time at which the alleged offense occurred was either the “ school noon hour ”, or the “ school recess ” or “ during opening or closing hours.” The People having failed to prove an essential element of their case, the judgment is reversed and the fine ordered remitted.

Submit order.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00116-CV

L.H.

v.

N.H.

§

§

§

§

From the 158th District Court

of Denton County (2013-20350-158)

December 3, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant L.H. shall pay all of the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
#### ESTATE of TAYLOR.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 7, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.1 Total Net Borrowing and Lending in Credit Markets1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date: 

9 a.m. (Eastern Time), October 20, 2008. 

# Place:

 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

 Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public.

# Matters To Be Considered: 

## Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the September 15, 2008 Board member meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.

b. Legislative Report.

3. Quarterly Reports.

a. Investment Policy Review.

b. Vendor Financial Reports.

4. Mid-Year Financial Audit.

## Parts Closed to the Public

5. Procurement.

6. Confidential Financial Information.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: October 9, 2008.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. E8-24571 Filed 10-10-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen J. Fanning, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Thermage, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Thermage, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    STEPHEN J. FANNING            
|                     |  |     |  | Stephen J. Fanning                   
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

I, John F. Glenn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Thermage, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Thermage, Inc.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN F. GLENN   
|                     |  |     |  | John F. Glenn          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### PHILLIPS v. GRAHAM.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7303

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ENRICO SALAZAR SANCHEZ, a/k/a Juan Sanchez, a/k/a Carlos Pun, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA00-36-DKC) Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Enrico Salazar Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada, Assistant United States Attorney, Gina Laurie Simms, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Enrico Salazar Sanchez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sanchez , No. CA-00-36-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug. 19, 2002; entered Aug. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Criminal Action No. 11-cv-0429-RBJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

JOHN DOE, aka FARKHAD K. SHARIPOV,

Defendant.

AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL, DATES AND DEADLINES

This matter has been rescheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A702, 7th Floor, 

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence March 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. It is 

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by February 10, 2012 and responses to 

these motions shall be filed by February 24, 2012. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall be made 

no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such 

experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made one week 

after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such experts shall be made no 

later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is further 

ORDERED that counsel shall jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-

4694 or by email at Jackson_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov within five days after filing of pretrial motions to set the case for Motions Hearing. It is further

Case 1:11-cr-00429-RBJ Document 23 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is scheduled for March 9, 2012 at 10:00 

a.m. in Courtroom A702. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to address: jury 

instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, stipulations as 

to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

If the parties reach a disposition, the Trial Preparation Conference will be converted to a 

Change of Plea Hearing. The deadline for submitting the plea agreement and statement of facts 

relevant to sentencing and the statement by defendant in advance of plea of guilty will be 48 

hours prior to the Change of Plea Hearing.

DATED this 9

th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00429-RBJ Document 23 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
No. 72-1068.

No. 72-1069.

#### Svejcar *v.*United States; and Grizaffi et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99(c)

Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
HSBC Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I (the receivables) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented by the Series 2002-1 Series Supplement, as of and for the year ended December

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of

In our opinion,

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.

/s/ KPMG LLP

March 1, 2006





Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Article III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented by the Series 2002-1 Series Supplement.



|/s/ Joyce Bevacqua
Joyce Bevacqua
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2006
Date                   |                                                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Asim Majeed
Asim Majeed
Chief Financial Officer
HSBC Finance Corporation - Retail ServicesMarch 1, 2006
Date | /s/ Chuck Colip
Chuck Colip
Deputy Managing Director /
Chief Operating Officer - 
HSBC Finance Corporation - Retail ServicesMarch 1, 2006
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 143 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 143

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Nelson of Florida) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL 
              SALES TAXES.

    Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, as amended by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, is 
amended by striking ``, and before January 1, 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                     ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

             Dated:  May 16, 2005                    /S/ANDREW R. PERZ
                   ------------------          ----------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00418-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

REUBEN JAMES SANTISTEVAN,

Defendant.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#15) on January 25, 2012, by Defendant. The Court construes this Notice as a motion to change

his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for April 2, 2012, at 3:30 p.m. and a Sentencing

hearing is set for June 25, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the United States District Court

for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for February 10, 2012, and the February
13, 2012, trial date are VACATED.

Dated this 2nd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7601

RODERICK ENGLISH,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00127-JFA)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Jerome English seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate 

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The 

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised 

English that failure to file timely objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). English has waived 

appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving 

proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability, deny English’s pending motions, and dismiss the 

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of DCT Industrial Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report
of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | 
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    PHILIP L. HAWKINS
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Philip L. Hawkins Chief Executive
Officer