alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### **Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation, (the “Company”) doeshereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 27, 2007
|   | /s/ R. Herbert Hampton  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | R. Herbert Hampton      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-5106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RICHARD HENRY ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1)

Submitted: August 27, 2009 Decided: December 8, 2009

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Whitney E. C. Minter, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Andrew McCormack, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Henry Robinson appeals the district court’s judgment entered pursuant to his guilty plea to failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (2006). Robinson reserved, in his plea agreement, the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in light of this court’s recent authoritative decision in United States v. Gould , 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in Gould . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
#### FRANK BUDREVIE, APPELLANT, v. WRIGHT AERONAUTICAL CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

Submitted June 2, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the appellant, *Isadore & Nathan Rabinowitz.*

For the respondent, *John W. Taylor.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court. •

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, JJ. 9.

*For reversal*— Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, McGeehan, Schettino, JJ. 5.
#### Dorle Numan WOOD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7321.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1938.

M. C. Redwine, of Winchester, Ky., and Perry B. Miller, of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

J. T. Metcalf, of Winchester, Ky., for the United States.

Before MOORMAN and HICKS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The law and facts of this cause having been submitted to the trial court without a jury, and the appellant not having made any request for specific findings of fact or law, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the authority of Rose v. United States, 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 966, Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 97, and Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 *S.Ct.*284, 70 L.Ed. 624.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A)
      AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                  Dated:  February 13, 2006         /S/ VICTOR INSETTA
                        -----------------------   --------------------------
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1608 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1608

To provide for the conveyance of certain land in Clark County, Nevada, 
                 for use by the Nevada National Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2007

 Mr. Ensign (for himself and Mr. Reid) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the conveyance of certain land in Clark County, Nevada, 
                 for use by the Nevada National Guard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Nevada Readiness Center 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NEVADA NATIONAL GUARD LAND CONVEYANCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Clark County, Nevada, 
may convey, without consideration, to the Nevada Division of State 
Lands for use by the Nevada National Guard between 35 and 50 acres of 
land in Clark County, Nevada, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
``Southern Nevada Readiness Center Act'', and dated October 4, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
#### Walter JAMES v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00387-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PABLO HERNANDEZ-DIAZ,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 26, 2011. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for November 4, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the

documents are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no

exceptions to this policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them

an original and one (1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See 

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent necessary, the United States

Marshal for the District of Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s

appearance for this hearing.

Dated: October 26, 2011

Case 1:11-cr-00387-REB Document 13 Filed 10/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS 

(Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-2395, 11-cv-2396 and 11-cv-2397)

ANA ALICIA ORTEGA,

KELLY BOREN,

KRISTAL CARILLO and

SHARELLE C. THOMAS,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipality,

OFFICER RICKY NIXON, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER KEVIN DEVINE, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER JOHN DOE ONE, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity, and

OFFICER JOHN DOE TWO, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City and County of Denver’s

Unopposed Motion for Consolidation filed September 19, 2011 (ECF No. 9). Pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.5E, this Court finds that the actions

listed below involve common questions of law or fact, including common parties and

common claims. Furthermore, the Court finds that consolidation of these cases will

avoid unnecessary costs and delays, and promote the efficient administration of justice. 

Case 1:11-cv-02397-WJM-CBS Document 15 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

As required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1A, approval for consolidation from Chief

U.S. District Judge Wiley Y. Daniel has been granted. Accordingly, the Court having

reviewed and considered the Unopposed Motion and the file, and being otherwise fully

advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Consolidation is GRANTED. The following

actions are consolidated with the instant action for all purposes, and all future filings in

any of these actions shall contain the caption as set forth above and shall be docketed

under Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS:

1. 11-cv-2395-CMA-CBS (Kelly Boren v. City and County of Denver, et. al)

2. 11-cv-2396-DME-MEH (Kristal Carrillo v. City and County of Denver, et.

al); and

3. 11-cv-2397-MSK-MEH (Sharelle C. Thomas v. City and County of Denver,

et al.).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer will be

the sole referral Magistrate Judge in the Consolidated Action.

Dated this 3rd day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02397-WJM-CBS Document 15 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 1
<CIK>     0001025707
<NAME>                     LITIGATION ECONOMICS, INC.
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  23,962
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                              625
[OTHER]                                    125
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        24,712
<PP&E>                                  27,548
<DEPRECIATION>                          (1,465)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          50,795 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,082
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 1,500
<OTHER-SE>                              47,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            50,795
<SALES>                                  7,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         7,036
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        42,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          (858)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (35,987)
<NET-INCOME>                           (35,987)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 33 Filed 03/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DENVER, COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02333-BNB
SEP 20 2011
LaFAYE ADAMS, GREGORY C. LANGHAM
CLERK

Plaintiff, -
v.
FED EX GROUND/HOME DELIVERY,

Defendant.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

Upon completion of the Court's review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1C, the
Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary
dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate
judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate
judge.

DATED September 20, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02333-BNB
LaFaye Adams
2940 S Parker Crt
Aurora, CO 80014

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 20, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:

~’ Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 23.2

NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Gastar Exploration Ltd.

1331 Lamar Street, Suite 1080

Houston, Texas 77010

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

Gentlemen:

As independent oil and gas consultants, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the incorporation by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gastar Exploration Ltd. of information from our reserve report dated January 29, 2008 entitled Estimate of Reserves and Future Revenues to Gastar Exploration Ltd. Interest in Certain Oil and
Gas Properties located in the United States as of December 31, 2007, Based on Constant Prices and Costs in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Guidelines and all references to our firm included in or made a part of the
Gastar Exploration Ltd. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.



Yours very truly,NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC./s/ C.H. SCOTT REESC.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E. President and Chief Operating Officer


March 13, 2008

Dallas, Texas
Docket No. 61755 

Appellant filed his petition on June 8, 2012, more than one 

year after entry of the judgment of conviction on May 4, 2011. 2Thus, 

appellant's petition was untimely filed and procedurally barred absent a 

demonstration of good cause—cause for the delay and undue prejudice. 

See NRS 34.726(1). 

To overcome the procedural bar, appellant claimed that he 

does not fully understand English, does not fully understand the law, and 

relied on a fellow inmate to prepare this petition. The underlying claims 

in this petition are similar to claims raised in a motion for modification of 

sentence filed in the district court on October 5, 2011, and therefore, 

appellant failed to demonstrate that an impediment external to the 

defense prevented him from raising the claims in a timely petition. 

Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). In 

addition, that appellant relied on a fellow inmate for legal work and that 

English is not his first language did not demonstrate good cause. See 

generally Phelps v. Dir., Nev. Dep't of Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 660, 764 P.2d 

1303, 1306 (1988) (holding that petitioner's claim of organic brain damage, 

borderline mental retardation and reliance on assistance of inmate law 

clerk unschooled in the law did not constitute good cause for the filing of a 

successive post-conviction petition). Therefore, the district court did not 

err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. 

2No direct appeal was taken. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
Docket No. 62000 

Appellant filed a second notice of appeal from the same order 

that was the subject of Docket No. 61755. The clerk of this court 

inadvertently docketed an appeal in Docket No. 62000 as a separate 

matter when appellant filed the second, duplicative notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to administratively close the 

appeal in Docket No. 62000. 

For the foregoing reasons, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED in 

Docket No. 61755 and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THE APPEAL in 

Docket No. 62000. 

—DeCtLai 

Douglas 

I /Lb' , J 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Fransisco Alfredo Ramos 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00172-MSK

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

 

ORDER

 

After preliminary consideration of the defendant’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to

Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (ECF No. 717), it is now

ORDERED that the United States Attorney on or before March 31, 2014, shall file an

answer or other pleading directed to the motion pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing

Section 2255 Proceedings.

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 718 Filed 01/23/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

 a/k/a “The Big Guy,”, a/k/a “Santa Claus,”

2. ABEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN (LNU),

3. OCTAVIO QUEZADA-PEREZ,

 a/k/a “Tavi,”

4. FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS,

5. GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO,

 a/k/a “Lupe,”

6. JULIO MARES-RUIZ,

 a/k/a “Mariano,”

7. LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVA, and

8. ROBERT MASON BYAS,

 a/k/a “Robin,”

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#168) on February 2, 2012, by Defendant Flodina Beletso Gallegos. The Court construes this

Notice as a motion to change her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’

plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for March 12, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for August 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The suppression hearing set for March 2, 2012, the final trial preparation

conference set for May 24, 2012, and the May 29, 2012, trial date are VACATED

as to Defendant Belletso Gallegos, only.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance 
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying 
audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         634,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 635,159<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     553,080<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   635,159<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,238<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,809<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 63,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, total assets include other assets of $1,135.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $82,079.
<F4>Total revenue includes interest and other revenue.
<F5>Total expense includes general and administrative.
<F6>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>