Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Notices 60283 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8586–5] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20080309, ERP No. D–TVA– 

E65082–00, Mountain Reservoirs Land 

Management Plan, Implementation, 

Proposes to Develop a Plan for 

Managing Nine Mountain Reservoirs: 

Chatuge, Hiwassee, Blue Ridge, Nottely, 

Ocoees 1, 2, and 3, Apalachia, and 

Fontana Reservoirs, Fannin, Towns, and 

Union Counties, GA; Cherokee, Clay, 

Graham, and Swain Counties, North 

Carolina; and Polk County, TN. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about shoreline 

development and potential water 

quality impacts. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20080315, ERP No. DA–BLM– 

K67011–NV, Betze Pit Expansion 

Project, Development of New 

Facilities and Expansion of Existing 

Open-Pit Gold Mining, Eureka and 

Elko Counties, NV. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

from tailings closure and cessation of 

mine dewatering, which could include 

soil salinity accumulations, saline and/ 

or alkaline runoff conditions, 

accelerated eolian or surface water 

erosion, fire, and cheatgrass or other 

weed infestations. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20080239, ERP No. DS–UAF– 

A10051–MA, Pave Paws Early 

Warning Radar Operation Project, 

Continued Operation of the SolidState Phased-Array Radar System 

(SSPARS), also known as Pave, 

Phased Array Warning Systems 

(PAWS), Cape Cod Air Force Station, 

MA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. Rating LO. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20080245, ERP No. F–FHW– 

J40181–UT, I–15, Corridor Project, 

Transportation Improvement from 

Utah County to Salt Lake County, UT. 

Summary: EPA continues to express 

environmental concerns about wetland 

and air quality impacts. 

EIS No. 20080317, ERP No. F–FHW– 

E40815–00, Interstate 73 North 

Project, Construct on New Alignment, 

from I–95 to Future I–74 in NC, 

Funding, U.S. Army COE Section 404 

Permit, Dillon and Malboro Counties, 

SC, and Richmond and Scotland 

Counties, NC. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concern about wetland 

impacts and the compensatory 

mitigation plan. 

EIS No. 20080323, ERP No. F–CGD– 

A99225–00, Rulemaking for Dry Cargo 

Residue (DCR) Discharges in the Great 

Lakes, To Regulate Nonhazardous and 

Nontoxic DCR Sweeping from Vessels 

in the Great Lakes that fall under the 

Jurisdiction of the United States. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project. 

EIS No. 20080335, ERP No. F–BLM– 

E60016–00, Alabama and Mississippi 

Resource Management Plan, Analyzes 

Management Alternatives for the 

Public Land and Resources, in 

Portions of the States of Alabama and 

Mississippi. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns because the 

FEIS presented minimal discussion of 

how the preferred disposal method will 

affect the ground water resources, 

including the Southern Hills Regional 

Sole Source Aquifer. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E8–24172 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8586–4] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information (202) 

564–1399 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly Receipt of Environmental 

Impact Statements Filed 09/29/2008 

Through 10/03/2008 Pursuant to 40 CFR 

1506.9 

EIS No. 20080401, Draft Supplement, 

FHW, OR, Sunrise Project, Proposes to 

Build a New East-West Oriented, 

Limited-Access Highway between I– 

205 to Rock Creek Junction, Funding 

and U.S. Army COE Section 404 

Permit, Clackamas County, Oregon, 

Comment Period Ends: 11/28/2008, 

Contact: Thomas Picco 503–731– 

8230. 

EIS No. 20080402, Final EIS, AFS, MT, 

Whitetail-Pipestone Travel 

Management, Develop Site-Specific 

Travel Management Plan, Jefferson 

and Butte Ranger Districts, 

Beaverhead-Deerlodge National 

Forest, Jefferson and Silver Bow 

Counties, MT, Wait Period Ends: 11/ 

10/2008, Contact: Terry Sexton 406– 

287–3223. 

EIS No. 20080403, Final EIS, FHW, UT, 

Layton Interchange Project, 

Improvements on I–15 (Exit-330) to 

Provide Unrestricted Access Across 

the Unicon Pacific Railroad and to 

Address Traffic Congestion on Gentile 

St. in West Layton, Layton City, UT, 

Wait Period Ends: 11/10/2008, 

Contact: Doug Atkin 801–963–0182. 

EIS No. 20080404, Draft EIS, DOI, 00, 

Grand Staircase—Escalante National 

Monument (GSENM), Draft 

Monument Management Plan 

Amendment & Draft Rangeland 

Health, Implementation, Portions of 

Kane and Garfield, Utah and 

Coconino County, AZ, Comment 

Period Ends: 01/08/2009, Contact: 

Paul Chapman 435–644–4309. 

EIS No. 20080405, Draft Supplement, 

COE, LA, Inner Harbor Navigation 

Canal (IHNC) Lock Replacement 

Project, Proposal for Relieving 

Navigation Traffic Congestion 

Associated with IHNC Lock, Located 

between the St. Claude Avenue and 

North Claibone Avenue Bridge, 

Orleans, LA, Comment Period Ends: 

11/25/2008, Contact: Richard E. Boe 

504–862–1505. 

EIS No. 20080406, Final EIS, BIA, MT, 

Absaloka Mine Crow Reservation 

South Extension Coal Lease Approval, 

Proposed Mine Development Plan, 

and Related Federal and State 

Permitting Actions, Crow Indian 

Reservation, Crow Tribe, Bighorn 

County, MT, Wait Period Ends: 11/10/ 

2008, Contact: Rick Stefanic 406–247– 

7911. 

EIS No. 20080407, Draft EIS, AFS, CA, 

Moonridge Animal Park Relocation 

Project, Application for a Special-UsePermit to Construct and Operate a 

Wild Animal Park and Associated 

Facilities, Mountaintop Ranger 

District, San Bernardino National 

Forest, San Bernardino County, CA, 

Comment Period Ends: 11/24/2008, 

Contact: Paul Bennett 909–382–2819. 

EIS No. 20080408, Draft EIS, COE, GA, 

Fort McPherson Project, Disposal and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

60284 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Notices 

Reuse, Implementation, in City Limits 

of Atlanta, Fulton County, GA, 

Comment Period Ends: 12/19/2008, 

Contact: Bob Ross 703–602–2878. 

EIS No. 20080409, Draft EIS, COE, CO, 

Fort Carson Grow the Army 

Stationing Decision, Constructing 

New Facilities to Support Additional 

Soldiers and their Families, Portions 

of El Paso, Pueblo and Fremont 

Counties, CO, Comment Period Ends: 

11/24/2008, Contact: Michael 

Ackerman 410–436–2522. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E8–24171 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority, Comments Requested 

October 6, 2008. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on 

this information collection should 

submit comments by December 9, 2008. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), (202) 

395–5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167, 

or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC). To 

submit your comments by e-mail send 

them to: PRA@fcc.gov. 

To view a copy of this information 

collection request (ICR) submitted to 

OMB: (1) Go to the web page http:// 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, 

(2) look for the section of the Web page 

called ‘‘Currently Under Review’’, (3) 

click the downward-pointing arrow in 

the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box and (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the title 

of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, 

if there is one) and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number to view detailed 

information about this ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information, send an e-mail 

to Judith B. Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0812. 

Title: Exemption from Payment of 

Regulatory Fees When Claiming NonProfit Status. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Not-for-profit 

institutions and business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 4,500 

respondents; 4,950 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .50 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual, on 

occasion and one time reporting 

requirements and recordkeeping 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. Statutory 

authority for this information collection 

(IC) is contained in 47 U.S.C. 159. 

Total Annual Burden: 2,475 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

Licensees or regulatees concerned about 

disclosure of sensitive information in 

any submissions to the Commission 

may request confidential treatment 

pursuant to 47 CFR 0.459 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

will submit this information collection 

as an extension (no change in reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements) after 

this 60 day comment period in order to 

obtain the full three year clearance from 

the OMB. There is no change in the 

estimated burden hours. 

The Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC) in accordance with 

the Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, is required to assess and 

collect regulatory fees from its licensees 

and regulatees in order to recover its 

costs incurred in conducting 

enforcement, policy and rulemaking, 

and international and user information 

services. 

The purposes for these requirements 

are to facilitate: (1) The statutory 

provisions that non-profit entities be 

exempt from payment of regulatory fees; 

and the FCC’s ability to audit regulatory 

fee payment compliance. 

In order to develop a Schedule of 

Regulatory Fees, the FCC must as 

accurately as possible, estimate the 

number of payment units and distribute 

the costs. These estimates must be 

adjusted to account for any licensees or 

regulatees that are exempt from 

payment of regulatory fees. The FCC, 

therefore, requires all licensees and 

regulatees that claim exemption as nonprofit entities to provide one-time only 

documentation sufficient to establish 

their non-profit status. Further, the FCC 

is requesting that it be similarly notified 

if for any reason that status changes. 

The documentation necessary to 

provide to the Commission will likely 

take the form of an Internal Revenue 

Service (IRS) ‘‘Determination Letter’’, a 

state charter indicating non-profit 

status, proof of church affiliation 

indicating tax exempt status, etc. 

The FCC is requiring licensees or 

regulatees to maintain and to make 

available, upon request, for inspection 

such records that they would normally 

keep in the course of doing business. 

These records are used to compute the 

amount of regulatory fee payment for 

period of two years from the time the fee 

payment was made. This will allow 

adequate time for the FCC to conduct 

any audits deemed appropriate to 

determine whether fee payments were 

made correctly. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8–24192 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES