alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 07-20-00202-CV

In re Caleb Logan Hart, Relator

 

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

September 29, 2020

Opinion Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 29, 2020, it is ordered, 

adjudged, and decreed that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally 

granted to the extent that the Honorable Steven R. Emmert rule on Relator’s pending

motions. Writ will issue only if Judge Emmert fails to act in accordance with this Court's 

opinion.

o O o
204 La. 108

#### STATE v. Lennie SAVOY.

No. 36748.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1943.

Rehearing Denied July 13,1943.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., Seth Lewis, Dist. Atty., of Opelousas, R. H. Lee, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

S. Allen Bordelon, of Marksville, and Lessley P. Gardiner, of Opelousas, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Justice.

For the reasons assigned in 14 So.2d 924, which was today decided, the judgment appealed from is reversed and set aside, defendant’s demurrer is now overruled, and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

HIGGINS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons. See 14 So.2d 925.

FOURNET, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

PONDER, J., dissents.

FOURNET, Justice

(dissenting).

The issues involved in this case are the same as those involved in the case of State of Louisiana v. Lennie Savoy, 14 So.2d 924, this day handed down, and, for the reasons therein assigned, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended March 31, 1997 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-3and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         452
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               881
<PP&E>                                         7,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881
<SALES>                                        471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  57
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                418
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            418
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   418
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  41.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  41.52
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7037

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY L. STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-174)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Stewart, No. CR-92-174 (E.D. Va. June 10,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: June 14, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02618-RPM

MARCELLA A. JONES, William A. Wills, II

Plaintiff,

v.

KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Matthew A. Holmes

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Scheduling Conference

1:56 p.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks.

Mr. Wills answers questions asked by the Court regarding claims and social security benefits.

Mr. Wills states plaintiff will withdraw the loss of income claim.

Mr. Wills further states plaintiff will also withdraw any claim for medical treatments except for the ones

deriving from the accident that occurred at defendant’s premises.

Mr. Wills clarifies plaintiff’s remaining claims and agrees to file a formal withdrawal of claims.

Argument by Mr. Holmes.

Discussion between Court and counsel regarding medical releases (specificity - doctors/body parts).

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Compel and Request for Forwith Hearing [12], is granted

with respect to a forwith hearing by this setting and resolved in all other respects as

stated on record.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion Extension of Lay Discovery Deadline [14], is granted to August

1, 2012.

Court states its practice regarding orders of reference to magistrate judge for settlement (joint motion).

2:25 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 29 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02618-RPM Document 17 Filed 06/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: May 20, 2013

Court Reporter: Mary George

Probation Officer: Gary Burney

Interpreter: Melinda Gonzales-Hibner

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO Richard Stuckey

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

1:36 p.m. Court in session.

Defendant present in custody.

Interpreter sworn.

Change of Plea Hearing on February 13, 2013. Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1, 7 and 10

of the Superseding Indictment.

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The Government does request departure (Doc. #546) and per oral modification. Argument.

The defendant does contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a). Argument.

Allocution. - Statements made by: The Government, the defendant, defense counsel.
Sentencing Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. No further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #546) and oral

amendment to same is GRANTED .

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD. Defendant is

sentenced to “time served”.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

2:16 p.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 40 minutes.

Hearing concluded.
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
1

In addition, the Amended Complaint does not comply with the formatting requirements

of this court. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB

SIGNE MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [Doc. # 9] filed 1/17/2012,

which is STRICKEN.

The action was commenced by the filing of a complaint on September 30, 2011. The

case file contains a Waiver of Service [Doc. # 4, filed 10/26/2011] indicating that service was

waived on October 25, 2011. The defendant answered the complaint on December 19, 2011. 

The Amended Complaint was filed on January 17, 2012, without leave of court and

without the written consent of the defendant.1

Amendment of pleadings is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) which provides in relevant

part:

(a) Amendments Before Trial.

(1) Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its

pleading once as a matter of course within:

Case 1:11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB Document 10 Filed 01/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

(A) 21 days after serving it, or

(B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is

required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days

after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is

earlier.

(2) Other Amendments. In all other cases, a party may amend its

pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the

court’s leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so

requires.

The plaintiff may not amend the complaint as a matter of course, no written consent of

the defendant has been provided, and leave of court was not obtained.

IT IS ORDERED that the Amended Complaint [Doc. # 9] is STRICKEN.

Dated January 24, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB Document 10 Filed 01/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K      containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods      included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates      (TRUCs), Series 2002-1 Trust; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does      not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a      material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of      the last day of the period covered by this annual  report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be      provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing,      or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these      reports; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and      the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the      annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as      disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each      fulfilled its obligations under thatagreement. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 35.5

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Series 2007-1, Class A Notes; Series 2007-1, Class B Notes |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|

I, David Grimme, Chief Operating Officer of HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2006 amending and restating in full the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2001 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Funding (USA) Inc. V, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from February 14, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 3rd day of March 2008.

|   | . |
|--------|---|

 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.

 

By:  /s/ David  Grimme

Name:  David Grimme

Title:  Chief Operating Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-2640-RBJ-BNB

ARDIS L. KERNS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANNER HEALTH, doing business as North Colorado Medical Center

Defendant.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02640-RBJ Document 3 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

 a/k/a “The Big Guy,”, a/k/a “Santa Claus,”

2. ABEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN (LNU),

3. OCTAVIO QUEZADA-PEREZ,

 a/k/a “Tavi,”

4. FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS,

5. GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO,

 a/k/a “Lupe,”

6. JULIO MARES-RUIZ,

 a/k/a “Mariano,”

7. LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVA, and

8. ROBERT MASON BYAS,

 a/k/a “Robin,”

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#168) on February 2, 2012, by Defendant Flodina Beletso Gallegos. The Court construes this

Notice as a motion to change her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’

plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 173 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for March 12, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for August 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The suppression hearing set for March 2, 2012, the final trial preparation

conference set for May 24, 2012, and the May 29, 2012, trial date are VACATED

as to Defendant Belletso Gallegos, only.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 173 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, OF CASH
FLOWS AND OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 INCLUDED
ELSEWHERE IN THIS FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,050
<SECURITIES>                                     2,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86
<INVENTORY>                                      5,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,896
<PP&E>                                           4,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,566
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,890)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,567
<SALES>                                         17,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,831
<CGS>                                            9,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,094)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47


</TABLE>
Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80257

(303) 844-3157

July 27, 2012

Douglas E. Cressler

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Mr. Neil Bruce

Bruce & Salt 

128 South Tejon, Suite 210

Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Kenneth Campbell

P.O. Box 1381

Monument, CO 80132

Mr. Gregory Langham

United States District Court for the District of Colorado 

Office of the Clerk

Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse

901 19th Street

Denver, CO 80294-3589

RE: 12-1099, Campbell v. USAA Auto Injury Solutions

Dist/Ag docket: 1:11-CV-02528-PAB-MEH

Dear Appellant, Counsel, and Clerk: 

Attached please find an order issued today by the court dismissing this case.

In addition, please be advised that the mandate for this case has issued today. The clerk of 

the originating court shall file accordingly. Please contact this office if you have 

questions.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of the Court 

EAS/sds

Appellate Case: 12-1099 Document: 01018887146 Date Filed: 07/27/2012 Page: 1 

Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 29 Filed 07/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1