alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         215
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               360
<PP&E>                                         7,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385
<SALES>                                        390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               398
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  80
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                318
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            318
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  31.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  31.52
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.2
 Rule
13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION I, Ralph A. Micalizzi, Jr., certify that:1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
  Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
  covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have;a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
  caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
  supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
  those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations;
  andc.
Disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
  is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
  over financial reporting.5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I
  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
  registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
  in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
  management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
  internal control over financial reporting.  Date: March 26, 2007
By:
/s/Ralph A. Micalizzi, Jr.
  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial Officer) 109
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,084,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,283,223<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (202,784)<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,283,223<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,823<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,862<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (29,039)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (29,039)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20,039)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.36)<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, total assets include net deferred expenses of 
$186,214, and other assets of $12,117.
<F2>Represents partners' capital deficiency.
<F3>Liabilities include investments in unconsolidated partnerships of
$1,186,283 and accounts payable and other liabilities of $299,724.
<F4>Represents interest and other revenue.
<F5>Total expense includes amortization of $18,618 and
general and administrative of $66,244.
<F6>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LSS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY A. PATE,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MARTIN GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-17228

D.C. No. 2:04-cv-01201-FCDDAD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jeffrey A. Pate appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

FILED

MAR 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LSS/Research 2 08-17228

indifference to his safety while he was a pretrial detainee at the Sacramento County

Main Jail. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because the

uncontroverted evidence showed that Garcia had no control over Pate’s placement

in the housing unit in which Pate was attacked, nor was there evidence that Garcia

knew of the risk to Pate’s safety before the attack. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511

U.S. 825, 837 (1994) (“[A] prison official cannot be found liable under the Eighth

Amendment for denying an inmate humane conditions of confinement unless the

official knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health or safety . . . .”);

Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 633 (9th Cir. 1988) (providing that an official can

be liable under § 1983 only “‘if he does an affirmative act, participates in another’s

affirmative acts, or omits to perform an act which he is legally required to do that

causes the deprivation’” at hand (citation omitted)). 

Pate’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2004: Q1... 6.3 6.3 5.8

 Q2... 6.4 6.3 6.0

 Q3... 6.6 6.5 6.2

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 6.7

 Q2... 7.4 7.3 6.9

 Q3... 7.7 7.7 7.2

 Q4... 8.1 8.0 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 7.8

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2004: Q1... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Q2... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Q3... 7.3 6.8 6.4

 Q4... 7.3 7.1 6.6

2005: Q1... 7.5 7.3 6.8

 Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.0

 Q3... 8.1 7.9 7.3

 Q4... 8.4 8.2 7.6

2006: Q1... 8.6 8.4 7.9

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2004: Q1... 5.7 6.1 6.2

 Q2... 6.0 6.2 6.6

 Q3... 6.2 6.6 6.8

 Q4... 6.7 7.0 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.3 7.3

 Q2... 7.4 7.7 7.5

 Q3... 7.9 8.0 7.8

 Q4... 8.8 8.8 8.5

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.0 8.6

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
#### CITY OF MIAMI v. SLATKO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1148

Lower Tribunal No. 12-732

________________

Charles J. Sibley, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

In re: The Estate of Curtiss F. Sibley,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C. 

Figarola, Judge.

Charles J. Sibley, in proper person.

Law Offices of Louise T. Jeroslow and Louise T. Jeroslow, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Sibley v. Estate of Sibley, 273 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2019), reh'g denied (May 9, 2019), review denied, SC19-821, 2019 WL 

4054958 (Fla. Aug. 28, 2019).
Case 1:11-cv-02643-BNB Document 3 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02643-BNB Document 3 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02643-BNB Document 3 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02643-BNB Document 3 Filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24173]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 6, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Lindoe, Inc., Ordway, Colorado, to acquire up to 25 percent of 
the voting shares of Southern Colorado National Bancorporation, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Southern Colorado 
National Bank, both of Pueblo, Colorado.
    2. Summerfield Financial Services, LLC, Fremont, Nebraska, to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of The First National Bank of Summerfield, Summerfield, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 7, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-24173 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
null

2016-05-27

535.20715

eng - Argued: 2016-05-27. Docket number: 15-3353
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40414

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS GUSTAVO RIOS-GARZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-97-CR-498-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Gustavo Rios-Garza appeals the sentence he received

following his guilty-plea conviction for being present in the

United States without permission following deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rios-Garza argues that the

district court erred and acted in violation of his right to due

process by imposing a sixteen-point enhancement, pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), for his prior Texas felony conviction

for possession of cocaine. Rios-Garza’s contention that the

district court erred in applying the guideline is foreclosed by 
No. 98-40414

-2-

our opinion in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691, 694

(5th Cir. 1997). Rios-Garza’s constitutional argument is

unfounded because his challenge is to a sentencing guideline, not

to a criminal statute. “Due process does not mandate . . .

notice, advice, or a probable prediction of where, within the

statutory range, the guideline sentence will fall.” United

States v. Pearson, 910 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1990). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: September 11, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Probation Officer: Katrina Devine (a.m.)

Michelle Means (p.m.)

Interpreter: Susanna Cahill

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

ABEL SANCHEZ-LEON, David Owen

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

10:11 a.m. Court in session.

Continued from July 30, 2013

Defendant present in custody.

Interpreter sworn.

The Government orally moves to dismiss the Counts in the original Indictment as to this

defendant. Defendant has no objection.

ORDER: The Government’s oral motion to dismiss the Counts in the original Indictment as

to this defendant is GRANTED.

Change of Plea Hearing on May 6, 2013. Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1-6; 13-14 of the

Superseding Indictment .

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The parties do not request departure.
Sentencing Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a). Further argument.

Allocution. - Statements made by: The Government, the defendant, defense counsel.

ORDER: The Sentencing hearing will be continued until 2:00 p.m. today for the reasons

stated on the record. 

11:46 a.m. Court in recess.

2:07 p.m. Court in session.

Oral findings are made of record. 

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. Further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Non-Guideline Sentence (Doc. #625) is DENIED.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

2:54 p.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 2 hours 20 minutes

Hearing concluded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02617-RPM

JOHN LAVRINC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 

ORDER TO COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4

 

It appearing from the files and records that defendant has not filed a disclosure

statement, it is

ORDERED, that counsel for the defendant shall file a disclosure statement pursuant to 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4.

Dated: October 19th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

. Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02617-RPM Document 5 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 725 Oakridge Dr., Romeoville, IL 60446, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f1929381df9d90939980b1959982df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c7f7e6c32707d7e746d5c78746f327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the website listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 10, 2007. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E8-2434 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>