alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice                               ( print page 58967)                            concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On August 15, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:                    

All employees of the Department of Energy (DOE), its predecessor agencies, and DOE contractors or subcontractors who worked at the Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee from March 1, 1943 through December 31, 1947 for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                    This designation became effective on September 14, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                    (14)(C). Hence, beginning on September 14, 2008, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: September 22, 2008.

Christine M. Branche,

Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 

 [FR Doc. E8-23894 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
#### COATS v. COLEMAN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinidn.
#### COLUMBIA FINANCE, Inc. v. ROMAGUERA.

No. 19211.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 23, 1949.

Warren M. Simon, New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

Appellant not represented.

REGAN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Columbia Finance, Inc., a corporation licensed under the' Small Loan Act of the State of Louisiana, filed suit against the defendent herein, Arthur Roma-guera, on a promissory note, dated June 7, 1948, in the sum of $300 less a credit on the principal thereof of $7.50, leaving an unpaid principal balance of $292.50, together with 25% attorneys' fees-on the aggregate amount of principal and interest involved and recognition of its lien and privilege on the property mortgaged in its favor -by the defendant.

Defendant was duly cited as is reflected by the citation in the transcript. No answer or other pleadings were filed by defendant within the legal delays. Thereafter a preliminary default was entered on De^ cember 6, 1948 and in due course confirmed by judgment rendered on December 13, 1948 and signed on December 17, 1948.

From this judgment the defendant, in proper person, prosecuted a suspensive and devolutive appeal. Plaintiff answered the appeal and requested that it be allowed 10% of the amount of the said judgment as damages for a frivolous appeal.

Defendant, who is not represented by counsel, made no appearance when this, case was set for trial nor has he filed a brief. The record amply sustains the judgment rendered by the lower court. The appeal obviously was taken for delay and is, therefore, frivolous. The.facts of the case warrant imposition of the penalty allowed under Article 907 of the Code of Practice. However, in our opinion, a penalty of 5% is sufficient under the circumstances. Arnold v. Atkins, La.App., 124 So. 640.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with 5% thereof additional as damages for frivolous appeal.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1241 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1241

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify student housing 
  eligible for the low-income housing credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2007

 Mr. Grassley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify student housing 
  eligible for the low-income housing credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF STUDENT HOUSING ELIGIBLE FOR LOW-INCOME 
              HOUSING CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subclause (I) of section 42(i)(3)(D)(ii) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain students not to 
disqualify unit) is amended to read as follows:
                                    ``(I) single parents and their 
                                children and such parents are not 
                                dependents (as defined in section 152, 
                                determined without regard to 
                                subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and 
                                (d)(1)(B) thereof) of another 
                                individual and such children are not 
                                dependents (as so defined) of another 
                                individual other than a parent of such 
                                children, or''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to--
            (1) housing credit amounts allocated before, on, or after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act, and
            (2) buildings placed in service before, on, or after such 
        date to the extent paragraph (1) of section 42(h) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 does not apply to any building by 
        reason of paragraph (4) thereof.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02622-REB-MEH

ANTHONY GRISBY,

Plaintiff,

v.

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., a Florida corporation,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice [#9] filed December

28, 2011. After careful review of the notice and the file, I conclude that the notice should be

approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice [#9] filed December 28, 2011, is

APPROVED; and

2. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their

own attorney fees and costs.

Dated December 30, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02622-REB-MEH Document 10 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 8 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 250 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 9 of 9
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of SportsNuts,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic  Report"),  I, Kenneth I.
Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Date as of August 14, 2006
                                      By       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Kenneth I. Denos
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Balqon Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ BALWINDER SAMRABalwinder SamraChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Dated:April 15, 2011
By:
/s/ ROBERT MIRANDARobert MirandaChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                              Exhibit 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENT that the individuals whose signatures appear
below, in their capacities as officers and directors of Immunex Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby constitute and appoint Douglas G. Southern their true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, to sign on behalf of
the undersigned the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 1997 fiscal
year pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and to
file the same, with exhibits thereto and any other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of the undersigned
does hereby ratify and confirm all that such attorney-in-fact may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.


Signature                          Title         Date


    /s/ Joseph J. Carr             Director                 March 10, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(Joseph J. Carr)


    /s/ Kirby L. Cramer            Director                  March 4, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(Kirby L. Cramer)


    /s/ Richard L. Jackson         Director                 March 10, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(Richard L. Jackson)


    /s/ John E. Lyons              Director                  March 1, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(John E. Lyons)


    /s/ Joseph M. Mahady           Director                  March 4, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(John E. Lyons)


    /s/ Edith W. Martin            Director                  March 8, 1998
-------------------------------                  -------------------------
(Edith W. Martin)


                                       72
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

t0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144225

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144225

COA: 306311

Kent CC: 08-010052-FC

KERRY DALE MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

Certification

 

The undersigned officer ofNatrol, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company'squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.  Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 
| Date:  |   | 11/14/2002 |   | Name:  | /s/ Elliott  Balbert   |
|--------|--------|------------|--------|--------|------------------------|
|   |   |       |   |   |                   |
|   |   |       |   | Title: | President/CEO/Chairman |

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02660-MSK-MEH

ATHENA NICK,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTECON, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 27th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02660-MSK-MEH Document 5 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4
---------



                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP





March 20, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Re:  Pacific State Bancorp
     Commission File No. 000-49892

To whom it may concern:

         Pursuant to the requirements set forth in paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of item
601 of Regulation S-K, and in connection with the filing of its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, Pacific State Bancorp hereby
agrees to file with the Commission, upon request, a copy of the Company's
Indenture dated June 26, 2002, for its $5 Million in principal amount of
Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2032,
issued to Pacific State Statutory Trust I.


PACIFIC STATE BANCORP


By: /s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO
    ------------------------------
    Steven A. Rosso, President/CEO

                                       19
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23980]



[[Page 59650]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Correction: Notice of Boundary Revision at Joshua National Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Correction: Notice of boundary revision at Joshua National 
Park.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register dated October 3, 
2008, Volume 73, No. 193, page 57650, information was printed 
incorrectly. In the first paragraph of the second column, the ninth 
line down should read Joshua Tree National Park, not Mesa Verde 
National Park.

Jerry Buckbinder,
Printing Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-23980 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
#### WALTER D. VAN RIPER, ATTORNEY-GENERAL, EX REL. ROBERT E. SCOTT, RELATOR, v. JOSEPH P. FLEMING, RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 7, 1947

Decided January 6, 1948.

Before Justices Bodine and Wachenfeld.

For the relator, Hobart, *Minard & Cooper (Duane E. Minard,*of counsel).

For the respondent, *Walter D. Van Riper.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wachenfeld, J.

Application was made by rule to show cause for leave to file an information in the nature of *quo warranto*challenging the validity of respondent’s appointment as a member of the New Jersey Eeal Estate Commission.' The parties have by agreement included in the record an information and demurrer and request this court, on the return of the rule, to make a final determination on the merits.

On November 19th, 1946, respondent was appointed a member of the New 'Jersey Eeal Estate Commission, which office he assumed and continues to occupy. Among other *359legislative qualifications, the vocation of each member of the commission “for a period of at least ten years prior to the date of his appointment shall have been that of a real estate broker.” *R. S.*45:15-5. Tt is undisputed that respondent has never been licensed in New Jersey as a real estate broker.

Eelator is a citizen and taxpayer residing in Union County, New Jersey. He is a duly licensed real estate broker and appears to be prosecuting this action in good faith. The sole issue is the effect of the inability of respondent to come within the vocational qualification as established ’by the legislature.

The New Jersey Eeal Estate Commission is a state agency created by statute. The legislature can lawfully determine the qualifications of the members of that commission and the manner of appointment, since they are not prescribed by the State Constitution. An appointment which fails to fulfill those prerequisites is invalid and must be so determined by this court. *Driscoll*v. *Sakin,*121 *N. J. L.*225; *affirmed,*122 *Id.*414; *DePasquale*v. *Steineder,*121 *Id.*281; *Haines*v. *Appleton,*123 *Id.*492.

Judgment of ouster will be entered.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.225  Life Insurance and Pension Fund Reserves** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of Deborah A. Greenspan, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

December 17,1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert H Straus (Diana J. Szochet*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On February 14, 1990, the respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, New York County, upon her plea of guilty, of the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, in violation of Penal Law § 175.35, which constitutes a class E felony. On May 4, 1990, the respondent was sentenced to a conditional discharge and a mandatory $100 surcharge.

*251Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon her conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Deborah A. Greenspan, is disbarred and her name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, the respondent Deborah A. Greenspan is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding herself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Quarterly Report  of The Heritage Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form 10-QSB  for the period  ending August 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Vickie Walker, Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief Financial
Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




/s/ Vickie Walker
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

October 8, 2003