alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                 AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
                                 (1995 STOCK PLAN)


       This Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (this
"Amendment") is effective as of March 8, 2000 by and between TeleTech
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("TeleTech"), and Scott Thompson
("Optionee").

       WHEREAS, TeleTech and Optionee entered into that certain Non-Qualified
Stock Option Agreement dated October 18, 1999 (the "Agreement"); and

       WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend certain provisions contained in the
Agreement; and

       WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of TeleTech has approved the terms of
this Amendment.

       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and promises set
forth in this Amendment, the parties agree as follows:

       1.     DEFINITIONS.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this
Amendment shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.

       2.     AMENDMENT.  Section 3A(e) of the Agreement is amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

              3A(e)  VESTING BASED ON PERFORMANCE CRITERIA.  In the event
       that the average of the closing stock prices of TeleTech common
       stock on Nasdaq as reported in the Wall Street Journal over any
       120 consecutive days beginning after the date of the Agreement is
       equal to or exceeds any one of the per share prices set forth
       below, the corresponding percentage of the portion of the Option
       then remaining unvested shall vest and become immediately
       exercisable as of the last day of such 120 consecutive day period:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          Price per Share           Percentage of Option Vested
          ---------------           ---------------------------
<S>                                 <C>
              $25.00                             25%
              $30.00                             50%
              $40.00                             75%
              $50.00                             100%
</TABLE>

       3.     OTHER TERMS UNCHANGED.  Except as expressly amended hereby, all
other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect and shall not be modified or affected by this Amendment.

<PAGE>

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

TELETECH HOLDINGS, INC.

By:    /s/ Michael Foss
       ------------------------

Name:  Michael Foss
       ------------------------

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
       ------------------------




       /s/ Scott Thompson
       ---------------------
       Scott Thompson





















                                       2
Exhibit 32.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Focus Affiliates, Inc. ( the
"Registrant" ) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the
"Quarterly Report" ), I, Michael Burke, President and Director of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

( 1 ) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

( 2 ) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Registrant.


Dated : July 9th, 2008            Signature :  /s/ Michael Burke
                                               --------------------------
                                                   Michael Burke
                                                   President and Director


<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00430-CMA-01

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. RICHARD DALTON,

Defendant.

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AND

FORFEITURE MONEY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Preliminary Order

of Forfeiture and Forfeiture Money Judgment (Doc. # 170). The Court having read said

Motion and being fully advised in the premises finds as follows:

The United States and Defendant Richard Dalton entered into a Plea Agreement,

which provides a factual basis and cause to issue a forfeiture order under 18 U.S.C.

§ 982(a)(1), and Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure;

THAT prior to the disposition of the assets, the United States is required to

seize the forfeited property and provide notice to any third parties pursuant to 21 U.S.C.

§ 853(n).

Case 1:11-cr-00430-CMA Document 183 Filed 05/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
2

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED AND ADJUDGED:

THAT Defendant Richard Dalton’s interest in the following:

a. a $500,000.00 money judgment, representing the amount of

proceeds obtained by the Defendant; 

b. 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado; 

c. one Webber OM Guitar with case S/N 2310; and

d. one 1.05 Carat diamond, currently part of a 14KT Yellow Gold ring,

is forfeited to the United States in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1). Pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4), this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as

to Defendant Richard Dalton at the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the

sentence and included in the judgment;

THAT the United States Marshal, or its designated sub-custodian, is directed to

seize the property subject to forfeiture, and further to make your return as provided by

law;

THAT the United States shall publish notice of this Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture in accordance with 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) via a government website for thirty

consecutive days;

THAT upon adjudication of all third-party interests, if any, the Court will enter

a Final Order of Forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), and Rule 32.2(b) of

the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which all interests will be addressed.

Case 1:11-cr-00430-CMA Document 183 Filed 05/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
3

The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and adjudicate the

interests of all third parties in ancillary proceedings. 

SO ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00430-CMA Document 183 Filed 05/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:   March 30, 2010
    /s/ John A. UstaszewskiJohn A. UstaszewskiTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02663-REB-MEH Date: October 17, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes FTR – Courtroom A501

DEMPSEY ALEXANDER KENNEDY and Nelson Boyle

CRYSTAL PHIFER,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and Edmund Kennedy

TAMMY MOSNESS,

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

MOTION HEARING 

Court in session: 10:47 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Argument and discussion regarding Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc. #70, filed

10/1/12).

ORDERED: Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc. #70, filed 10/1/12) is GRANTED

in part and DENIED in part as stated on the record.

Court in recess: 11:30 a.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 0:43

Case 1:11-cv-02663-REB-MEH Document 78 Filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99(b)





Independent Accountants' Report





The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation



We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-1 (the loans) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.  Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of loans has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004





Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-1 has been conducted by Household Consumer Lending, as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001.







|/s/ Joe Vozar              | /s/ Jorge Cordon             
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Chief Financial Officer-   | Managing Director-Operations-
|Household Consumer Lending | Household Consumer Lending   
|                           |                              
|                           |                              
|February 28, 2004          | February 28, 2004            
|Date                       | Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,742
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,575
<OTHER-SE>                                     (23,231)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,742
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35,190)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-13-1997
<CASH>                                          92,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,051
<PP&E>                                         274,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,955
<SALES>                                        165,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,665
<CGS>                                           33,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,577
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.72
        

</TABLE>
# FILED
May 27, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE FEBRUARY

1998 SESSION

TRACY HIG GIN BOT HAM ) ) Appellant, ) C.C.A. No. 01 C01-9704-CC-00126 ) vs. ) WAYNE COUNTY ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) Honorable Jim T. Hamilton ) Appellee. ) (Habeas Corpus) ) )

SEPARA

TE CONCURRING OPIN ION I concur in the results i n this case. In State v. Milton S. Jones, Jr. , No. 02C01-9503-CR-00061, slip op. at 5 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson , March 7, 1997), a panel of this court ruled that mens rea is an element of offenses such as s exual battery or rape. While I subscribe to the view expr essed in Jones , I do concur that the allegations in these i ndictments do imply the mens r ea.

_________________________________ Gary R. Wade, Judge
Exhibit 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report





The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation



We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-1 (the loans) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about HSBC Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the loans has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.





/s/ KPMG LLP



March 1, 2005









Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated May 1, 2001.





|/s/ Steve Smith
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 





|/s/ Joe Vozar
Joe Vozar
Chief Financial Officer -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Consumer LendingMarch 1, 2005
Date | /s/ Jorge Cordon
Jorge Cordon
Managing Director - Operations -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Consumer
LendingMarch 1, 2005
Date
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02695–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

IBEW LOCAL #111, 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Request for Missing Documents” (Doc. No. 34, filed May 4, 2012) is DENIED. 

Plaintiff requests that the court provide her with all but a few of the documents previously filed

in this case because she has had “technical problems” with the court’s CM/ECF filing system

that resulted in her having to pay “hundreds of dollars for documents that are supposed to be

free.” However, notwithstanding Plaintiff’s suggestion that the court is “obligated to provide

plaintiff with these documents,” the court has no legal basis to order the Clerk of Court to

provide her with free copies of court filings. Outside of a few exceptions that are inapplicable

here, the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, “makes no provision for litigation

expenses.” Patel v. United States, 399 F. App’x 355, 359 (10th Cir. 2010). Plaintiff may print

copies of previously-filed documents through the Clerk’s Office for $.10 per page. 

The court further notes that, notwithstanding Plaintiff’s suggestion that she has “canceled” her

CM/ECF account, Plaintiff is required to demonstrate good cause before her ECF registration

may be revoked. See D.C.COLO. ECF Civ. Procedures 3.2D. Accordingly, Plaintiff may file a

motion no later than May 23, 2012 demonstrating good cause to support the revocation of her

ECF privileges. If no such motion is filed by May 23, 2012, the court will assume that Plaintiff

intends to retain her ECF privileges. Until that time, the court will serve any court-initiated

filings (e.g. orders and/or recommendations) on Plaintiff at her home address as featured in her 

Case 1:11-cv-02695-REB-KMT Document 39 Filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Complaint. Defendant is directed to do the same (i.e. serve Plaintiff with its court filings, if any,

at her home address). 

Dated: May 9, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02695-REB-KMT Document 39 Filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 15 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 15 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 15 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
#### Duncan STEWART v. STATE.

8 Div. 150.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 21, 1935.

See, also, 153 So. 296.

RICE, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.