alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02437-RPM

ANDREA L. CHISHOLM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL, an Individual, and

BRIAN VANDERMARK, an Individual,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL AND

BRIAN VANDERMARK

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon review of the Clerk’s record and it appearing that at the scheduling

conference on December 15, 2011, before Magistrate Judge Kathleen Tafoya, counsel

informed that defendant Joseph Wayne McKeel was deceased and it also appearing

that there has been no return of service on the defendant Brian Vandermark, it is

ORDERED that this civil action is dismissed as to defendants Joseph Wayne

McKeel and Brian Vandermark.

DATED: September 20th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
#### LORAINE TRANSFER CO., Inc., v. PEACOCK’S, Inc.

No. 6213.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 4, 1941.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1941.

*814Dickson & Denny, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Isaac Abramson, of Shreveport, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

In January, 1938 defendant, Peacock’s, Inc., commenced the remodeling of its store in Shreveport, Louisiana; and in connection with this undertaking, it sold the previously used fixtures to the firm of Wolf & Klar of Fort Worth, Texas, and arranged to acquire new equipment.

Bids on the cost of delivering the sold fixtures were sought and obtained by defendant’s president from various common carriers, including plaintiff, the Loraine Transfer Company, Inc. The latter, which is engaged in interstate hauling under a permit from the Interstate Commerce Commission, proposed in writing on January 22, 1938, to effect the moving for $420, this price being, computed in accordance with an individual tariff under which it then' operated.

Plaintiff’s bid was accepted; and on the night of March 19, 1938, the fixtures were removed from defendant’s premises and their transportation to Fort Worth began.

In the meantime, definitely on February 18, 1938, plaintiff joined the Household. Goods Carriers’ Bureau and elected to operate under what is known as the Holman ■ Tariff. This scheduled a rate for the hauling job under consideration of $640.10, or $220.10 in excess of the amount of plaintiff’s accepted proposal. After the hauling was completed and payment of the quoted price had been made by Wolf & Klar, plaintiff learned of the difference in the rates of the two tariffs; and on gaining this knowledge and pursuant to the advice of a representative of the Interstate Commerce Commission, it brought this suit to collect the alleged under-charge of $220.10.

Defendant resists the action on the ground that the additional amount claimed is unwarranted, and, further, for the reason that the obligation for the moving expense was solely that of Wolf & Klar.

The district court rejected the demands, of plaintiff and it appealed.

Even if it be conceded that defendant was a party to the hauling contract, and was responsible thereunder, the evidence does not clearly disclose that the Plolman Tariff, the increased rate of which caused the difference herein claimed, was applicable to the shipment. The fixtures were removed from defendant’s store, as above shown, on the night of March 19, 1938;. and all were in transit to Fort Worth,. Texas, the following day. The Holman Tariff, according to plaintiff’s president and as shown by the document evidencing it, did not become effective until March 23, 1938, and, apparently, delivery at the destination had been completed previous thereto.

The judgment, therefore, is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

May 29, 1996

Mr. Russ Gerhard

Vice President, Engineering & Development
Genicom
Genicom Drive

Waynesboro, VA 22980

Re: Amendment to Services Agreements December 18, 1995

Dear Russ:

Genicom and ADC recently negotiated special base pricing for the new GM Model
354842AB0000A3GM printer of $2,853.00 for a quantity of 1,000 units. This is net
of ECN 96-0104. A condition of this pricing is a guarantee by Genicom of an
additional 58,000 hours added to the minimum guarantee of 980,000 man hours.

Paragraphs 2.02 (a) and (c) of the Services Agreement are amended to read:

2.02 (a) During the Minimum Guarantee Period, as defined below, Genicom
guarantees that (i) it shall purchase products from ADC at a total price to
Genicom of no less than Fifty Four Million ($54,000,000) Dollars and (ii) ADC
shall expend no fewer than 1,038,000 man-hours to meet Genicom such production
requirements (the "Minimum Guarantee").

         (c) If ADC does not expend 1,038,000 or more man-hours during the
Minimum Guarantee Period, Genicom shall pay ADC within thirty (30) days of
receipt of an invoice an amount equal to the product of Six ($6.00) Dollars per
man-hour (the fixed cost portion of ADC's fully-burdened labor rate) and the
difference between 1,038,000 man-hours and actual number of man-hours expended
by ADC during the Minimum Guarantee Period.

If you agree with these changes, please have an officer of Genicom sign so that
the agreement can be amended.

Sincerely,
/s/William B. McDonough
William B. McDonough

Vice President Southeast Operations

Genicom Corporation                                Atlantic Design Company, Inc.

By: /s/ Russell M. Gerhard                         By: /s/ James N. Chavetta

Its:                                               Its: President

Date: 6/6/96                                       Date: 6/14/96
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1780 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1780

    To require the FCC, in enforcing its regulations concerning the 
 broadcast of indecent programming, to maintain a policy that a single 
               word or image may be considered indecent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2007

 Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. Inouye) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the FCC, in enforcing its regulations concerning the 
 broadcast of indecent programming, to maintain a policy that a single 
               word or image may be considered indecent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Children from Indecent 
Programming Act''.

SEC. 2. FCC MAY REGARD SINGLE WORD OR IMAGE AS INDECENT.

    Section 16 of the Public Telecommunications Act of 1992 (47 U.S.C. 
303 note) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following:
    ``(c) Single Word or Image Policy.--In administering the 
regulations promulgated under subsection (a), the Commission shall 
maintain a policy that a single word or image may constitute indecent 
programming.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Wilford CANADY, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Florida, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Thomas E. Walker, of Marianna, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1123 (Final)]


Steel Wire Garment Hangers From China Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject 
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission 
(Commission) determines, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United 
States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of steel 
wire garment hangers, provided for in subheading 7326.20.00 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found 
by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in the United 
States at less than fair value (LTFV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this investigation effective July 31, 
2007, following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and 
Commerce by M&B Metal Products Company, Inc., Leeds, AL. The final 
phase of the investigation was scheduled by the Commission following 
notification of a preliminary determination by Commerce that imports of 
steel wire garment hangers from China were being sold at LTFV within 
the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice 
of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission's investigation 
and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by 
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the 
notice in the Federal Register of April 4, 2008 (73 FR 18560). The 
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2008, and all persons 
who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by 
counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on September 29, 2008. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4034 (September 2008), 
entitled Steel Wire Garment Hangers from China: Investigation No. 731-
TA-1123 (Final).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 29, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-23322 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF

BYLAWS

OF

COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP

a California Corporation

 

JohnF. Coger and James S. Rickards certify that:

 

1.             They are the duly elected and acting President andSecretary, respectively, of COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP.

 

2.             The following amendment has been approved by theshareholders of COMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP at the annual meeting held May 25,2006.

 

3.             Article III Section 3.2 of the Bylaws ofCOMMUNITY VALLEY BANCORP shall be amended to read as follows:

 

**Section 3.2,****Number and Qualification ofDirectors.** The authorized number of directors of thecorporation shall not be less than eight (8) nor more than fifteen (15)until changed by an amendment of the articles of incorporation or a bylawamending this Section 3.2 duly adopted by the vote or written consent ofholders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.  The exact number of directors shall be fixedfrom time to time, within the range specified in the articles of incorporationor in this Section 3.2: (i) by a resolution duly adopted by theboard; (ii) by a bylaw or amendment thereof duly adopted by the vote of amajority of the shares entitled to vote represented at a duly held meeting atwhich a quorum is present, or by the written consent of the holders of amajority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote; or (iii) by approvalof the shareholders (as defined in Section 153 of the Code).

 

4.             The foregoing amendment wasone of which must be adopted by the shareholders of the company.

 

 
|   | //s//  John F.Coger           |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | John  F. Coger, President     |
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
|   | //s//  James S Rickards       |
|   | James  S. Rickards, Secretary |

 

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1744 

To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility requirements to 

foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to the provision of 

assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 

requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations 

with respect to the provision of assistance under part 

I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Global Democracy Pro5 motion Act’’. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 1744 IS

1 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL 

2 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART I OF THE FOR3 EIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regula5 tion, or policy, in determining eligibility for assistance au6 thorized under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

7 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), foreign nongovernmental 

8 organizations— 

9 (1) shall not be ineligible for such assistance 

10 solely on the basis of health or medical services, in11 cluding counseling and referral services, provided by 

12 such organizations with non-United States Govern13 ment funds if such services do not violate the laws 

14 of the country in which they are being provided and 

15 would not violate United States Federal law if pro16 vided in the United States; and 

17 (2) shall not be subject to requirements relating 

18 to the use of non-United States Government funds 

19 for advocacy and lobbying activities other than those 

20 that apply to United States nongovernmental organi21 zations receiving assistance under part I of such 

22 Act. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.118 Private Pension Funds1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 10 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 10 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 10 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 10 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
Amelia Stayton and Ray 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00820-CV

Buddy CASTEEL and Jaret B. Casteel,

Appellants

v.

Amelia STAYTON and Ray Baugh,

Appellees

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Real County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-3228-DC

Honorable Watt Murrah, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On January 30, 2015, this court issued an order directing appellant’s counsel to show 

cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. On February 5, 2015, 

appellant’s counsel filed a response to the order and a motion for extension of time seeking an 

additional thirty days to file appellant’s brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is 

due to be filed no late than February 19, 2015. Absent extenuating circumstances, no further 

extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99(a)

Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2


Original Principal Class A              670,730,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)             670,730.00
Original Principal Class M               83,840,000.00
Number of Class M Bond (000's)               83,840.00


                                                              Sum of 1/20/2002
Distribution Date                                               to 12/20/2002
                                                                  Total 2002

CLASS A
Principal Distribution                                            319,297,612.76
Class A Interest Distribution                                      12,858,230.16

Total Distribution Amount - Class A                               332,155,842.92


CLASS M
Principal Distribution                                             39,911,606.52
Interest Distribution                                               2,025,345.95

Total Distribution Amount - Class M                                41,936,952.47
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region II Buffalo District Advisory Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of open Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time, and agenda for the next meeting of the Region II Buffalo District 
Advisory Council. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 15, 2008 from approximately 
9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Buffalo Club, 388 Delaware 
Avenue, Buffalo, New York, 14202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meeting of the Region II Buffalo District Advisory Council. The Region 
II Buffalo District Advisory Council is tasked with providing 
information of public interest.
    The purpose of the meeting is so the council can provide advice and 
opinions regarding the effectiveness of and need for SBA programs, 
particularly the local districts which members represent. The agenda 
will include: District office, SBA program, and disaster updates, 
lending activity reports, small business week, event announcements, and 
roundtable discussion on small business issues.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The meeting is open to the public; 
however, advance notice of attendance is requested. Anyone wishing to 
attend and/or make a presentation to the Region II Buffalo District 
Advisory Council must contact Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, 
Buffalo District Office by October 10, by fax or e-mail in order to be 
placed on the agenda. Franklin J. Sciortino, District Director, Buffalo 
District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration, 540 Niagara 
Center, 130 S. Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202; telephone (716) 
551-4301 or fax (716) 551-4418.
    Additionally, if you need accommodations because of a disability or 
require additional information, please contact Kelly Lotempio, BDS/PIO, 
Buffalo District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration, 540 
Niagara Center, 130 S. Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202; 
telephone (716) 551-4301, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9799909085d290938899918c9593bc8f9e9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4229272e2e3b6c2e2d36272f322b2d023120236c252d34">[email protected]</span></a> or fax (716) 551-4418.
    For more information, please visit our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/ny/buffalo.

    Dated: September 29, 2008.
Cherylyn Lebon,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-23460 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 35.2




SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE




PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE




SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




Re:
HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I


Series 2007-1, Class A Notes; Series 2007-1, Class B Notes







I, Sharon L. Fugitt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Card Services Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2006 amending and restating in full the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2001 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Funding (USA) Inc. V, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:




1.
A review of the activities of the Company from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and





2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below:





NONE





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 28th day of March 2011.








HSBC Card Services Inc.











By: /s/ Sharon L. Fugitt


Name: Sharon L. Fugitt