alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Donald Leon GRAF, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17475.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1963.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 22, 1963.

Thomas Moore, St. Paul, Minn., represented Donald Leon Graf in the District Court.

Miles W. Lord, U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., represented the United States in the District Court.

Before JOHNSEN, Chief Judge, and MATTHES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The District Court permitted appellant to file notice of appeal from the denial of his motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, but it refused him leave to proceed further in forma pauper-is, on the ground that the appeal was frivolous. He now seeks to have us grant him such leave. We think the District Court was right in regarding the appeal as frivolous.

As a matter of public interest, however, in not having any attack upon a criminal sentence remain open and unterminated, and hence here to clear the record of the appeal which is pending from the filing of notice of appeal, we shall permit the appeal to be docketed without payment of fee, and shall then dismiss it as frivolous.

The single ground for relief set forth in appellant’s motion to vacate was that his plea of guilty had not been voluntarily made, but that it was the product of threats, implied threats, promises and illegal inducement.

The trial court had appellant returned from the Leavenworth Penitentiary, and appellant retained counsel to represent him. A pretrial conference was held, and thereafter a full-scale hearing was engaged in. Development was permitted to be made of every conceivable aspect which could possibly have any bearing on the question of the voluntariness of his plea, such as whether there was anything (1) in his mental or physical condition, (2) in the representation of his counsel, or (3) in his arrest or the Commissioner proceedings, which could have imposed any coercion upon him so as to control his action. The court found that there was not, and that the plea had been made voluntarily and was free from any coercion. Indeed, beyond the corroboration existing in the other evidence, a reading of the transcripts of appellant’s arraignment and sentencing is of itself sufficient to so persuade.

' Appeal dismissed.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1327 

To create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. 

INOUYE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. NELSON of 

Nebraska, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To create and extend certain temporary district court 

judgeships. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS FOR DISTRICT 

4 COURTS. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, 

7 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate— 

8 (A) 1 additional district judge for the east9 ern district of California; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 1327 IS

1 (B) 1 additional district judge for the dis2 trict of Nebraska. 

3 (2) VACANCIES NOT FILLED.—The first va4 cancy in the office of district judge in each of the 

5 offices of district judge authorized by this sub6 section, occurring 10 years or more after the con7 firmation date of the judge named to fill the tem8 porary district judgeship created in the applicable 

9 district by this subsection, shall not be filled. 

10 (b) EXTENSION OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY JUDGE11 SHIPS.—Section 203(c) of the Judicial Improvements Act 

12 of 1990 (Public Law 101–650; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) is 

13 amended— 

14 (1) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘the 

15 district of Hawaii,’’ after ‘‘Pennsylvania,’’; 

16 (2) in the third sentence (relating to the district 

17 of Kansas), by striking ‘‘16 years’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘26 years’’; 

19 (3) in the fifth sentence (relating to the north20 ern district of Ohio), by striking ‘‘15 years’’ and in21 serting ‘‘25 years’’; and 

22 (4) by inserting ‘‘The first vacancy in the office 

23 of district judge in the district of Hawaii occurring 

24 20 years or more after the confirmation date of the 

25 judge named to fill the temporary judgeship created 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•S 1327 IS

1 under this subsection shall not be filled.’’ after the 

2 sixth sentence. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BETHLEHEM AUTHORITY 

v.

THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENN 

FOREST TOWNSHIP

PETITION OF: PENN FORREST TOWNSHIP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 150 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ATLANTIC WIND, LLC

v.

ZONING HEARING BOARD OF PENN 

FOREST TOWNSHIP 

PETITION OF: PENN FORREST TOWNSHIP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ATLANTIC WIND, LLC 

v.

PENN FOREST TOWNSHIP ZONING 

HEARING BOARD

PETITION OF: PENN FORREST TOWNSHIP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court
[150 MAL 2022, 151 MAL 2022, 152 MAL 2022 and 153 MAL 2022] - 2

BETHLEHEM AUTHORITY

v.

PENN FOREST TOWNSHIP ZONING 

HEARING BOARD 

PETITION OF: PENN FORREST TOWNSHIP

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 153 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### Richard M. SNOWDEN, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest Lee Smith, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7338.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1938.

Marcus C. Redwine, of Winchester, Ky., and Perry B. Miller, of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.

J. T. Metcalf, of Winchester, Ky., for the United States.

Before MOORMAN and HICKS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, District Judge. v

PER CURIAM.

The law and facts of this cause having been submitted to the trial court without a jury, and the appellant not having made any request for specific findings of fact or law, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the authority of Rose v. United States, 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 966, Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 97, and Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m. Thursday, October 9, 2008.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

DCIO Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Staff Assistant.

 [FR Doc. E8-23957 Filed 10-6-08; 11:30 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### WALTERS CONTRACTING CORP. v. McAllister.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

May 27, 2015

Hon. Michael W. Morris

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Mark Anthony Moncada Estrada

TDCJ #1568684

McConnell Unit

3001 S. Emily Drive

Beeville, TX 78102

Hon. Ricardo P. Rodriguez

Hidalgo County District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-13-00283-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-712-08-C

Style: MARK ANTHONY MONCADA ESTRADA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pro Se’s motion to appoint attorney in the above cause was this day DENIED by 

this Court. Pro Se’s motion for rehearing in the above cause was this day DENIED by 

this Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eonorable H. L. Baukai(ght 

Acting COUnty AttOlXUy 

Travi8 County 

hl8tin, Pm8 

Dour Sir;' 

You rwpuurt 6n 

r&&t or th8 Comai8slon4r 

to approptiato +dOO.OQ for 

roan sgulpasnt t 

O? the blstioaal 

in Browa*00d, T4 

Ip8ELt tf &XAMha8 

retUrn ot 8siOh 

8 a0 

kl. . 

dsp4rtz64at on th4 

Vi8 county, TOxa8, 

f wrehaol~ng readlng 

tormurtsr CO-8 

, nOW8tat%QI#Bd 

that 8Wh 8’3ti)- 

mp Es bry upoti tha 

Z'P8d U&WA tbb,Doadb8tQ5er8@ 

&8t3@ of tlhs %ml88b Civil 

8' court and th8 COua811 

itY Or t%VFIt I5 this 

38d fc th4:r df8f?i'OthUt, 

oi8fdt IIlIp, not otherrise 

0 pIJT.thS Q404884lT 4q4li848 Of 

iV4 Whit8 bi th8 ~tiQKi81 (kurb 

(@oo.~f D&&W8 p8r BlO<h for 8Wb %T3bfi888 

from any on4 awb Ceurt, C~tmcil or C0ma&88~on 

'fer any 0114 orgarritatlon~ . . .* 
our opinion t&t t&r uao of saob laobpiafj4 aadtert~ * 14&8- 

14tiV4 fAttItttfOA that 8U4h mOtt8y i8 to be U0.d tOr 4dU&li8- 

tratfre 0r4rh66a and not fox t&8 purpose8 her4 8ou#tt. 

It i8 our o~in:o&l th4t your QU88tiOtt nrU6t be aO8- 

asrsd in tiao as~stlv8. 

-fOUP8 V44 tti)r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance 
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying 
audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         619,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 620,839<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     536,313<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   620,839<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,525<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               116,863<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57<F6>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash, total assets include other assets of $1,451.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and other liabilities of $84,526.
<F4>Total revenue includes interest and other revenue.
<F5>Total expense includes general and administrative.
<F6>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty

Civil Action No: 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Date: January 16, 2015

Courtroom Deputy: Molly Davenport FTR: Courtroom A 501

Parties: Counsel:

CARL GENBERG Pro se

 Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN S. PORTER Michelle Albert

Edwin Aro

 Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in session: 10:12 a.m.

The Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. 

IT IS ORDERED THAT the [159] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution or for Entry of 

Show Cause Order is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS ORDERED THAT all documents requested through discovery are to be produced on or 

before February 13, 2015. All objections, with the exception of privilege, are waived. 

[174] MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Third Amended 

Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant’s answer is due by January 26, 2015.

Discovery deadline: August 14, 2015

Dispositive Motion deadline: September 11, 2015

Discussion was held regarding discovery issues and pending requests for discovery. Regarding 

the pending subpoena duces tecum issued by the plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED THAT the subpoenas 

do not need to be re-served. The recipients have 14 days from the date of this Order to respond.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the subpoena duces tecum served on Arnold & Porter, LLP

is QUASHED.

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 180 Filed 01/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for October 29, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge 

Hegarty in Courtroom a 501.

Discussion was held regarding search terms and parameters to be used to search the plaintiff’s 

computer.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Protective Order is to be put in place prior to the plaintiff’s 

production of documents. 

Court in recess: 11:54 a.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 1:42

To obtain a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)825-6119.

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 180 Filed 01/16/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 9, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.131 Funding Corporations1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02641-RPM

NBH BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,

a Nebraska corporation, 

Defendant.

 

ORDER FOR HEARING

 

Upon consideration of Defendant’s unopposed motion to extend deadlines [26] filed

June 27, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the extensions requested appear to be unreasonable. Accordingly, the

motion will be set for hearing.

Dated: June 29th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02641-RPM Document 28 Filed 06/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### RIVER HEIGHTS, Inc., v. MANUFACTURERS TRUST COMPANY, Trustee; The Prudence Company, Inc., Frank Fox, Trustee, and Ruth S. Berlin, Inc.

No. 7768.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1937.

Cates, Smith & Long, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

Frantz, McConnell & Seymour, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellees.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal in this cause be, and same is, dismissed, pursuant to agreed motion of counsel.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAVARES L. ROBINSON, DOC #T68047, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2063 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Alisa Smith, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60307-60308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1785-DR]


Florida; Amendment No. 11 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated August 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jeffery L. 
Bryant, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this declared disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Thomas P. Davies as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals

[[Page 60308]]

and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance 
to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036; Disaster 
Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 
97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-24081 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


         I, Matthew Richman, Chief Financial Officer of Front Porch Digital Inc.
(the  "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2003 of the  Registrant,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                              By: /s/ MATTHEW RICHMAN
                                                  --------------------------
                                              Name: Matthew Richman
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer

August 19, 2003

-------------------------

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Porch Digital Inc. and will be retained by Front Porch Digital
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                 96,990
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          22,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                           168,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      293,388
<PP&E>                                 67,775
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        376,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 119,350
<BONDS>                               147,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  122
<OTHER-SE>                             89,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          376,072
<SALES>                               264,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      264,551
<CGS>                                 219,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         219,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      2,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (3,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (1,464)     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (2,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2015

No. 04-14-00549-CR

Leopoldo CORTEZ-LEIJA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5438

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court