alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Sbarro, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 18, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael O'Donnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  June 2, 2004

/s/ Michael O'Donnell
---------------------
Michael O'Donnell
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02651-MSK-KMT

SAMUEL G. LIVINGSTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN R. LIVINGSTON,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 20th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02651-MSK-KMT Document 8 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. And, because mandamus and 

prohibition are extraordinary remedies, the decision to entertain a petition 

for a writ of mandamus or prohibition lies within our discretion. Hickey v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 105 Nev. 729, 731, 782 P.2d 1336, 1338 

(1989). 

Petitioner represents that the juvenile court has not entered a 

written order in this matter. Because the juvenile court's oral order is 

"ineffective for any purpose," Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 

689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987), the court remains free to reconsider the 

issue, see id. at 688, 747 P.2d at 1382; see also Bradley v. State, 109 Nev. 

1090, 1094-95, 864 P.2d 1272, 1275 (1993) (recognizing that a judge's oral 

pronouncement of judgment and sentence remains subject to modification 

until it is signed by the judge and entered by the clerk). For this reason, 

we are not convinced that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ is 

warranted at this time, and we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Pickering 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney GenerallCarson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A OD
File No. 06

- 09

- 00089

- CR

In Re Roland Fergurson

Ancillary to

Ricky Allen Barnett v. The State of Texas

* * * * *

Order

* * * * *

Issued on January 2 6, 2010

Debra Autrey, Clerk

Sixth Court of Appeals

by ____________________

Deputy

Filed on January 2 6, 2010

Debra Autrey, Clerk

Sixth Court of Appeals

by ____________________

DeputyORDER

On January 6, 2010, this Court entered an order directing Roland Fergurson to file an

affidavit explaining why he had delayed in submitting the appellant's brief. Fergurson has now

filed his affidavit of explanation. We accept the reasons given in his affidavit, and no contempt

order will be issued.

BY THE COURT

Date: Janua ry 26, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11426]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1787-DR), dated 09/05/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/24/2008 through 08/14/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         09/18/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/04/2008.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road,Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,  U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of New Hampshire, dated 09/05/2008, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Carroll.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-24143 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1640 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1640

 To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the 
 vessel hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull 
                              and a deck.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2007

   Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kohl, and Mr. Whitehouse) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the 
 vessel hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull 
                              and a deck.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL HULL DESIGN PROTECTION.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Vessel Hull 
Design Protection Amendments of 2007''.
    (b) Designs Protected.--Section 1301(a) of title 17, United States 
Code, is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Vessel features.--The design of a vessel hull, deck, 
        or combination of a hull and deck, including a plug or mold, is 
        subject to protection under this chapter, notwithstanding 
        section 1302(4).''.
    (c) Definitions.--Section 1301(b) of title 17, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``vessel hull, including 
        a plug or mold,'' and inserting ``vessel hull or deck, 
        including a plug or mold,'';
            (2) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:
            ``(4) A `hull' is the exterior frame or body of a vessel, 
        exclusive of the deck, superstructure, masts, sails, yards, 
        rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other attachments.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) A `deck' is the horizontal surface of a vessel that 
        covers the hull, including exterior cabin and cockpit surfaces, 
        and exclusive of masts, sails, yards, rigging, hardware, 
        fixtures, and other attachments.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Dr. F. A. BLANCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dr. R. T. HARBESON et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 4130.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1931.

Joseph S. Guerriero, of Monroe, for appellants. .

Theus, Grisham, Davis & Leigh, of Monroe, for appellee.-

DREW, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover a solidary judgment against defendants. The basis of the suit is five promissory notes made by defendants payable to themselves and by them indorsed. The notes represent the amount due for the rent of a building leased by plaintiff to defendants.

Defendants filed exceptions of vagueness and no cause of action, which exceptions were by agreement referred to the merits. Defendants in answer admit making the notes, and allege that the rent contract was abrogated and canceled by oral agreement between plaintiff and defendants, and that said notes were extinguished and supposed to have been destroyed.

Plaintiff filed a motion to have judgment on the petition and answer, which motion ,was .overruled by the lower court and the case tried on the merits, resulting in judgment for plaintiff, as prayed for. From this judgment, defendants have appealed. Plaintiff answered the appeal praying that the motion for a judgment on the petition and answer be sustained. Under our finding in the case, we prefer to pass on the merits.

There has been no appearance in this court by appellants, and we therefore consider the appeal as abandoned. However, we have carefully read the record, and find no error in the judgment of the lower court. It is purely a question of fact, and it is clear that the plaintiff proved its case with a preponderance of evidence.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11467]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1797-DR), dated 09/26/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding associated with Hurricane Ike. *Incident Period:*
                         09/12/2008 through 09/14/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         09/26/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/25/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/26/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/26/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                    Baldwin, Mobile. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for economic injury is 11467. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-24080 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON. JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Civil District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P.O.Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

March-£, 2015

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-06-00585-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-l-GN-05-004378

Style: Appellants, Cities of Corpus Christi, et al. // Cross-Appellant, AEP Texas Central

Company

v. Appellee, Public Utility Commission of Texas // Cross-Appellees, Cities of Corpus

Christi, et al.

Dear Honorable Velva L. Price:

The Third Court of Appeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning

the following original exhibits:

SEALED: Four envelopes and 1 box.

Very truly yours,

/f'/

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Filed in The District Court

of Travis County, Texas

MAR 1 2 2015

At M.

Velva L. Price, District Clerk

•Ti

*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-25-1997
<CASH>                                       1,741,000
<SECURITIES>                                11,142,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,918,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   930,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,179,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,613,000
<PP&E>                                       2,164,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,417,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,391,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,968,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,391,000
<SALES>                                     79,597,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,597,000
<CGS>                                       53,014,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,014,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,456,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (77,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,204,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,001,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,203,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,203,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION                                EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                      ------------

COMPUTATION OF (LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                                   NINE MONTHS
                                                    YEAR ENDED        ENDED       YEAR ENDED
                                                   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,     MARCH 31,
                                                       1995           1994           1994
                                                   ------------   -------------   -----------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>             <C>
 
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 
Net income (loss) per statement of operations        $  501,000    $(1,058,000)    $  357,000
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding         5,832,000      5,803,000      5,859,000
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========
Primary net income (loss) per share                  $      .09    $      (.18)    $      .06
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:/(1)/

Net income (loss) per statement of operations        $  501,000    $(1,058,000)    $  357,000
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========
Reconciliation of weighted average number of 
 shares per primary computation above, to 
 amount used for fully diluted computation:

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, per
 primary computation                                  5,832,000      5,803,000      5,859,000

Add - effect of outstanding options and warrants 
 (as determined by the application of the 
 treasury method)                                         5,000         27,000              -
                                                     ----------    -----------     ---------- 
Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted        5,837,000      5,830,000      5,859,000
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========
Fully diluted net income (loss) per share            $      .09    $      (.18)    $      .06
                                                     ==========    ===========     ==========
</TABLE> 

/(1)/  This calculation is submitted, for the nine months ended December 31,
       1994, in accordance with Regulation S-B Item 601(b)(11) although it is
       contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces an
       anti-dilutive result.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-130867) of Gastar Exploration Ltd. of our report dated March 18, 2005 (December 21, 2005 as to Notes 5, 13, 14, 22 and Note 25) relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Gastar Exploration Ltd. and subsidiaries, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ BDO DUNWOODY LLP
|                    
|Calgary, Alberta    
|March 31, 2006
818 A.2d 329

#### IN THE MATTER OF LOIS ANNE WOOD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 26, 2003.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-149, concluding that LOIS ANNE WOOD of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LOIS ANNE WOOD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent .reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

 

                We have issued our report dated October 26,2001, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofCiprico Inc. and subsidiaries which is incorporated by reference or included intheir Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001.  We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said report in the Registration Statement of Ciprico Inc. andsubsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-47840, File No. 33-78116, File No.33-64999, File No. 33-65001, File No. 333-02931, File No. 333-02933, File No.333-42841, File No. 333-42843, File No. 333-42845 and File No. 333-61018).

 

 

 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

October 26, 2001
Case 1:11-cv-02628-LTB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-LTB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-LTB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02628-LTB Document 12 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4