alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,291
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,881
<PP&E>                                          28,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,994
<SALES>                                         18,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,682
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,225)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ July 12, 2012

ERRATA

______________________

2012-1228

SCIELE PHARMA INC. (now known as Shionogi Pharma Inc.),

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

ANDRX CORPORATION, ANDR X PHARMACEUTICALS INC. (doing business as Watson Laboratories Inc. - Florida), ANDRX PHARMACEUTICALS L.L. C., ANDRX LABORATORIES (NJ) INC., ANDRX EU LTD., and ANDRX LABS L.L.C.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LUPIN LTD. and LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

MYLAN INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

Defendants.

______________________

Decided July 2, 2012

Precedential Order

______________________Please make the following change:

Page 2, correct name “Douglas C. Hochstetler” to “Douglass C. Hochstetler”
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

h1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145452

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145452

COA: 306203

Oakland CC: 2007

- 213494

- FC

DENNY BRYANT McCOWAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02620-MSK-KLM

MOISES VALDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., a Kansas corporation,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion ofany appellate proceedings. The Court

will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be

destroyed.

DATED this 20th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02620-MSK-KLM Document 5 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-2949

___________ Mary Lickteig, * * Plaintiff/Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Robert Kolar, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant/Appellee. * * * *

___________ Submitted: May 14, 2009 Filed: June 7, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, EBEL * and CLEVENGER ** , Circuit Judges.

___________ EBEL, Circuit Judge. On September 17, 2009, this Court issued an "Order for Certification

* The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.

** The Honorable Raymond C. Clevenger III, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit Cour t of Appeals, sitting by designation.of Questions of State Law," Lickteig v. Kolar, Jr. , No. 08-2949 (8th Cir. Sept. 17, 2009) to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota certifying three questions of Minnesota state law to that Court. On May 27, 2010, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion answering those three questions. Lickteig v. Kolar , ----N.W.2d----, 2010 WL 2103997 (Minn. 2010). On the basis of the answers provided by the Minnesota Supreme Court in this matter, the district court order this case is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota for further proceedings consistent with our Order of Certification and the Supreme Court's opinion answering the certified questions presented to it.

-2-
EXHIBIT 31.1




                           CERTIFICATION OF
            CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
                   RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A)
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jacinta Sit, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Oxford Technologies,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: June 15, 2004

/s/ Jacnta Sit
-------------------------------
Jacinta Sit, President and CFO
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC13

- 2315

____________

LARRY CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

[January 29, 2015]

PER CURIAM

.

Larry Charles Williams seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District

Court of Appeal in Williams v. State , 127 So. 3d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) , on the

assertion that it expressly and directl y conflicts with the Second District Court of

Appeal’s decisi on in Shackelford v. State , 579 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)

, and

the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Stanton v. State , 576 So. 2d 925

(Fla. 1st DCA 1991), on a question of law.

We initially gran ted the petition for review

. H owever, after reviewing the

limited record in this case, and conducting oral argument, we have determine d that

review was improvidently granted

. Thus, we discharge jurisdiction of this cause.- 2

-

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CAN A DY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal

- Direct
Conflict of Decisions

Fourth District

- Case No. 4D12

- 2964

(St. Lucie County)

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ellen Anne Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida,

for Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, C onsiglia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, and Mitchell A lan Egber, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, Florida,

for Respondent
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: July 24, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Probation Officer: Katrina Devine

Interpreter: Marcela Salazar

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ, Boston Stanton

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

9:11 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant present in custody.

Interpreter sworn.

The Court addresses defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Plea Agreement (Doc. #601). 

Argument.

ORDER: Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw Plea Agreement (Doc. #601) is DENIED.

The Court addresses defendant’s Motion for Substitute Counsel (Doc. #602).

ORDER: Defendant’s Motion for Substitute Counsel (Doc. #602) is DENIED.

Change of Plea Hearing on March 20, 2013. Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1, 7, 8 and 9

of the Superseding Indictment.

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 609 Filed 07/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Sentencing Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

The Government does request departure (Doc. #552). Argument.

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a).

Allocution. - Statements made by: The Government, the defendant, defense counsel.

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. No further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #552) is GRANTED.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

10:36 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 1 hour 25 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 609 Filed 07/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                FORM 10-K/A-No. 1

[X]  Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

[_]  Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ........  to ........

                         Commission File Number 0-13617



                             LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



                 MASSACHUSETTS                                   04-2537528
      (State or Other Jurisdiction of                         (I.R.S. Employer
        Incorporation or Organization)                       Identification No.)

 111 LAWRENCE STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS                     01702
     (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)



        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (508) 988-1000



     The sole purpose of this Form 10-K/A is to file Annual Reports on Form 11-K
     for The Lifeline Employees' Savings and Investment Plan.

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its
     behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC. (REGISTRANT)

      /s/ Dennis M. Hurley


BY    Dennis M. Hurley
      Senior Vice President, Finance
      Chief Financial Officer

DATE  June 26, 2002

<PAGE>

PAGE 1

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.    Exhibit

(99.1)         Annual Report for the Lifeline Employees' Savings and Investment
               Plan
(99.1a)        Consent of Independent Public Accountants
#### E. B. STINSON v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.

6 Div. 599.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 14, 1935.

*922Clark & Trawick, oí Birmingham, for appellant.

W. J. Wynn, of Birmingham, for appellee.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
September 21, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Third District of Texas P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711 - 2547 512 - 463 - 1733 RE: COA No. 03 - 15 - 00154 - CR Trial Court Cause No. D - 1 - DC - 14 - 200998 Frank Brown v. State of Texas Dear Mr. Kyle, This is my second request for extension in the above - entitled cause, and I would respectfully request a 30 - day extension. I have been swamped with back to back jury trials due to trials that have carried over from one week to two and going straight into an other jury trial, and I currently have the above - entitled cause on appeal along with the following records COA No. 03 - 15 - 0000424 - CR, COA No. 03 - 15 - 00066 - CR, COA No. 03 - 15 - 00302, COA No. 03 - 15 - 00306, and COA No. 03 - 15 - 00177 - CR, which was transferred to the First Court of Appeals in Houston pending. I have enlisted help and am working every minute that I am not in court including late nights and every weekend and am doing the very best that I can. Due to the circumstances, I would request until October 21 st

. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 512 - 854 - 9315 or by email at Kimberly.lee@traviscountytx.gov. Sincerely, Kimberly Lee Official Court Reporter 147 th District Court Travis County, Texas 512 - 854 - 9315
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraware, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),I Peter H. Jackson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:             July 7,2005

 
| /s/ PETER H. JACKSON                                                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Peter H. Jackson                                                                           |
| *President and Chief Executive Officer of  Intraware, Inc.  (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intraware, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),I Wendy A. Nieto, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:             July 7,2005

 
| /s/ WENDY A. NIETO                                                                                        |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Wendy A. Nieto                                                                                            |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Executive  Vice President of Intraware, Inc.  (Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
#### Henry BEAVERS v. STATE.

6 Div. 674.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 16, 1935.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BOULDIN, Justice.

The indictment charged that appellant, Henry Beavers, with malice aforethought killed Willie Wynn, by shooting him with a pistol. On the trial appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and his punishment fixed at imprisonment for life.

The appeal is upon the record, without bill of exceptions. No error appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction and sentence will be, and is, in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and POSTER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23



CPAs



DIXON, DAVIS, BAGENT & COMPANY

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

1205 WEAVER DRIVE, GRANVILLE, OHIO 43023  740-321-1000  FAX 740-321-1100









Exchange Bancshares, Inc.

237 Main Street

P.O. Box 177

Luckey, OH 43443





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report of Exchange Bancshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of our report dated January 23, 2003 included in the Form 10-KSB of Exchange Bancshares, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed March 31, 2003.







/s/  Dixon, Davis, Bagent & Co

Dixon, Davis, Bagent & Company





Granville, Ohio

March 22, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                          FIRST MANITOWOC BANCORP, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, the undersigned certify that the Annual Report of First Manitowoc Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. No
purchaser or seller of securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing
statement for any purpose, and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation
to update the foregoing statement except as required by law.



Date:    March 12, 2004
                                                 /s/ Thomas J. Bare
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Bare
                                                 Chief Executive Officer



Date:  March 12, 2004                            /s/ Thomas J. Bare
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Thomas J. Bare
                                                 Chief Financial Officer