alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John E. Duffy, certify that:

 

1.                    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Hickory Tech Corporation;

 

2.                    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements and other financial information included in this report fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.                    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)                   designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)                  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                   disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.                    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)                   all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)                  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 4, 2004  |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ John E. Duffy       |   |
| John E. Duffy           |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Elizabeth A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sidney MADDOCK, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

John J. Moore, of Stuart, for plaintiff in error.

PI. J. Dame, of Fort Pierce, for defendant in error:

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for defendant in error.
Exhibit 32.1



TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR                          
|                      |  | Jeffrey W. Taylor Chief Executive
Officer      
|                      | 
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | /s/ BRUCE W. TAYLOR                            
|                      |  | Bruce W. Taylor Interim Chief Financial
Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002











I, Leonard A. Rosenbaum, President and Chief Executive Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.











Dated: November 15, 2010
/s/ Leonard A. RosenbaumLeonard A. RosenbaumChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 10.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TeliaSonera AB (the Company) for the
period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim Ignatius, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                              
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

| |                    |  |                                                   
| | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------
| |                    |  | /s/ Kim Ignatius                                  
| |                   
| | Name:
Title:
Date: |  | Kim Ignatius
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02696–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BLACK AND MCDONALD/CUSTOM LIGHTING SERVICES, 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Motion Seeking Leave to Submit Late Filing” (Doc. No. 78, filed July 13, 2012) is

DENIED. It appears that Plaintiff is attempting to respond to the court’s June 29, 2012 Minute

Order denying her previous Motion Seeking Leave to File Restrict Documents – Level #3 (Doc.

No. 70) by submitting an untimely motion to restrict access to her “Conventional Level #3

Resricted [sic] Submission Directed to the District Judge/Motion for Leave to File Level Three

Restricted Documents” (Doc. No. 68, filed June 27, 2012). However, Plaintiff has not attached

any “late filing” to her Motion, nor does the Motion itself address the relevant factors governing

restricting access to court filings. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2B. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court

is directed to unrestrict Plaintiff’s “Conventional Level #3 Resricted [sic] Submission Directed

to the District Judge/Motion for Leave to File Level Three Restricted Documents” (Doc No. 68). 

Dated: July 17, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 80 Filed 07/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company;

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance company;

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company:

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company;

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company;

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company;

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

___________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Defendants Travelers Motion to Withdraw Docket #302, Motion to Exclude Claimed

Evidence Involving Property damage Occurring Prior to June 1, 2009 (Doc 311 - filed

December 20, 2013) is GRANTED. Docket #302 is WITHDRAWN.

Dated: December 30, 2013

___________________________________________________________________________

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 312 Filed 12/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### POOSER v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11404 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOEY CHRISTOPHER SERO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-42-Y

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joey Christopher Sero, proceeding pro se , appeals his convictions for bank robbery. Sero contends that the Government did not prove that the deposits of Bank One of Texas, N.A., were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), a requirement for establishing federal jurisdiction. Sero’s motion to file his reply brief in its current form is
GRANTED. Proof that a bank was FDIC-insured at the time of a robberyNo. 96-11404 -2- is an essential element of the crime of bank robbery and is necessary to establish federal jurisdiction. United States v. Slovacek , 867 F.2d 842, 845 (5th Cir. 1989). Rule 11(f), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides that the district court must satisfy itself that there is a factual basis for a guilty plea. See United States v. Guichard , 779 F.2d 1139, 1146 (5th Cir. 1986). The record demonstrates that the district court established that there was a sufficient factual basis for Sero’s guilty plea. The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
#### LAMPKIN v. KENT PILING CO., Inc.

No. 2981.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 12, 1948.

Writ of Error Denied June 1, 1948.

For former opinion, see 34 So.2d 76.

S. S. Reid, of Amite, for appellant.

Brumfield Hebert & Rush, of Baton-Rouge, and L. B. Ponder, Jr., of Amite, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Kent Piling Company, Inc., defendant-appellant, has applied for a rehearing, contending that there are numerous errors in our opinion. We have carefully considered its assignment of errors and have *637again studied the transcript of testimony, as well as our opinion. We are convinced that our opinion is correct under the established jurisprudence of this State except insofar as it condemns Kent Piling Company, Inc. to pay all costs of court.

As noted in our former opinion, Consolidated Underwriters was made a defendant in a supplemental and amended petition which was filed by the plaintiff. However, judgment was not rendered against it although both defendants admitted that Consolidated Underwriters was the workmen’s compensation insurer of Kent Piling Company, Inc. at the time of Frank Lempkin’s death. No appeal from the judgment was taken by the plaintiff, nor did the plaintiff answer the appeal. Hence, we agree with counsel for the defendants that we were in error in condemning Kent Piling Company, Inc. to pay all costs of the suit. It is our opinion that that company should pay all costs of suit except those incurred in making Consolidated Underwriters a party defendant, such as the costs in connection with the filing of the supplemental and amended petition and the service of same upon Consolidated Underwriters, which should be paid by the plaintiff, and our opinion is amended accordingly.

Defendant-appellant’s application for a rehearing is refused.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2303
KRISH PURSWANI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORTUNE PERSONNEL CONSULTANTS OF COLUMBIA,INCORPORATED; COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; FRANCIS BARRY, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN YANES, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-85-3-17BD) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Krish Purswani, Appellant Pro Se. Tracy Lynn Eggleston, Allan Levin, John L. Choate, COZEN & O'CONNOR, Columbia, South Carolina; Weldon R. Johnson, BARNES, ALFORD, STORK & JOHNSON, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief onhis civil complaint. Appellant asserted claims of fraud, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and job discrimination based on his race. The district court granted summary judgment on all claims and as to all Defendants except for Appellant's breach of contract claim against Defendant Collier Health Services, Inc. Because the only surviving claim was based on state law and Appellant's claimof damages failed to satisfy the jurisdictional amount, the district court remanded this claim to state court for disposition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Purswani v. Fortune Personnel Consultants of Columbia , No. CA-95- 85-3-17BD (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH v. WIESEN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02594-RPM

DALE GROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer; 

IAN SWEENEY, Community Parole Officer; 

JENNIFER DUNCAN, Community Parole Officer; 

ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board; 

ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board; 

DENISE BALAZIC, Member of the Parole Board; 

PATRICIA BAN WAAK, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN O’DELL, Member of the Parole Board; 

MICHAEL ANDERSON, Member of the Parole Board; 

REBECCA OAKES, Member of the Parole Board; 

WALTER T. SIMON, President of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

JOHN DOES, Numbers 3-4, unknown officers of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

FREDERICK E. TOLSON, President Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

JOHN DOES, Number 5-6, unknown officers of Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program,

Inc.; and 

JOHN DOES, Number 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment

Program, Inc., 

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER ACCEPTING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

____________________________________________________________________________

Upon review of the plaintiff’s motion to accept his response to defendants’ motion for

summary judgment [62], it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the response filed January 12, 2014 [61] is

accepted for filing.

DATED: January 13th, 2014

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 64 Filed 01/13/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
----

----

**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                  of                  the Company at the end of the periods covered by the Annual Report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  April 17, 2007 |   |                                                                                                                                        |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | By:    | /s/                  *Andrew                  Hamilton              * |
|                                  |   | Andrew                  Hamilton                                                                                                            |
|                                  |   | Chief                  Executive Officer                                                                                                    |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02594-RPM

DALE GROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer; 

IAN SWEENEY, Community Parole Officer; 

JENNIFER DUNCAN, Community Parole Officer; 

ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board; 

ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board; 

DENISE BALAZIC, Member of the Parole Board; 

PATRICIA BAN WAAK, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN O’DELL, Member of the Parole Board; 

MICHAEL ANDERSON, Member of the Parole Board; 

REBECCA OAKES, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN DOES, Numbers 1-2, unknown officers of RSA Inc.; 

WALTER T. SIMON, President of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

JOHN DOES, Numbers 3-4, unknown officers of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

FREDERICK E. TOLSON, President Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

JOHN DOES, Number 5-6, unknown officers of Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program,

Inc.; and 

JOHN DOES, Number 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment

Program, Inc., 

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

____________________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on October 31, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.

in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout

Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of

Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx

(Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions

(Rev. 11/11). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 31 Filed 09/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

by 4:00 p.m. on October 25, 2012. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in

person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend. 

DATED: September 21st, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 31 Filed 09/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company,

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company,

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company, 

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company,

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a New

Jersey insurance company,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order

re: Expert Disclosure Deadline [docket no. 132, filed February 12, 2013] (the “Motion”).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the parties shall designate all

experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)

on or before February 28, 2013, and the parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide

opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before April 15,

2013.

DATED: February 13, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 136 Filed 02/13/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1