alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI et al., Petitioners, v. Howard F. SUDDUTH, Respondent.

No. B-2820.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1972.

James R. Riggs, City Atty., Charles Cromwell, Asst. City Atty., Corpus Christi, for petitioners.

*721Charles G. Lyman, Corpus Christi, for respondent.

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

In this suit by City of Corpus Christi and other local taxing units against Howard F. Sudduth for a personal judgment only for delinquent ad valorem taxes on personal property, the trial court sustained a special exception to plaintiffs’ petition, and, upon refusal of plaintiffs to amend, the court dismissed the suit. The court of civil appeals affirmed. Tex.Civ.App., 466 S.W.2d 881. We reverse the judgments and reinstate the case for trial.

The petition describes the property on which the taxes are delinquent as “Personal Property: Furniture and Fixtures, Office Equipment, and Law Books at 621 Wilson Building, Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas.” Defendant’s special exception was directed at the generality of the description of the property, it being alleged that defendant could not properly prepare his defenses without a more particularized description.

Plaintiffs’ description of the property is in substantial conformity with the requirements of Art. 7328.1, Sec. 2, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, which provides that in suits of this type it shall be sufficient to describe personal property “in such general terms as fixtures, tools, machinery, equipment ... or any other appropriate general description, and no other or more particular description or designation shall be required . . . .” The court of civil appeals held, however, that while the description would be sufficient in the absence of special exception filed pursuant to Rule 91, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, a trial court could, on special exception, require a more particularized description. We disagree.

It is our opinion that the Legislature intended by enactment of Art. 7328.1 that the manner there provided for describing personal property in suits of this type be sufficient, and that no other or more particular description should be required by special exception or otherwise. Questions regarding the burden or methods of proof in tax suits are not before us.

The judgments of the court of civil appeals and trial courts are reversed and the cause is reinstated for trial.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE U.S.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Dated: February 11, 2011 | /s/ Lutz Klingmann                                               
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Lutz Klingmann                                                   
|                         | Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997

<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0          
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,921,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   491,000    
<INVENTORY>                                    5,087,000  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,747,000 
<PP&E>                                         248,000    
<DEPRECIATION>                                 60,000     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,121,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,371,000 
<BONDS>                                        0          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0          
<PREFERRED>                                    0  
<COMMON>                                       44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,675,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,121,000
<SALES>                                        40,993,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,993,000
<CGS>                                          38,521,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  38,521,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,024,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (712,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   282,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (430,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (430,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.10)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company;

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance company;

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company:

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company;

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company;

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company;

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

___________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Defendant Everest National Insurance Company’s Unopposed Motion for Leave for

Client Representative to Appear Via Telephone at Status Conference Set for August 8, 2013

(Doc 221 - filed July 19, 2013) is DENIED.

Dated: July 22, 2013

___________________________________________________________________________

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 222 Filed 07/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
816 A.2d 151

#### IN THE MATTER OF PAUL W. SONSTEIN, FORMERLY A JUDGE OF THE CHERRY HILL MUNICIPAL COURT

February 28, 2003.

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed a presentment recommending that PAUL W. SONSTEIN, formerly a Judge of the Municipal Court of Cherry Hill, be censured for violations of Canons 1 (A *Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary),-*2A and 2B (A *Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All*Activities) of the *Code of Judicial Conduct,*and *Rule*2:15-8(a)(6)(engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute);

And respondent, through counsel, having waived his right to a hearing before the Supreme Court and having consented to the imposition of the sanction recommended by the Advisory Committee on Júdicial Conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the presentment of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct is adopted and PAUL W. SONSTEIN is hereby censured.
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices 59649 

[FR Doc. E8–23975 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Minerals Management Service 

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil 

and Gas Lease Sales 

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority 

vested in the Director of the Minerals 

Management Service by the joint 

bidding provisions of 30 CFR 256.41, 

each entity within one of the following 

groups shall be restricted from bidding 

with any entity in any other of the 

following groups at Outer Continental 

Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 

during the bidding period November 1, 

2008 through April 30, 2009. The List of 

Restricted Joint Bidders published in 

the Federal Register April 22, 2008, and 

the correction published in the Federal 

Register on June 27, 2008, covered the 

period May 1, 2008 through October 31, 

2008. 

Group I 

Exxon Mobil Corporation 

ExxonMobil Exploration Company 

Group II 

Shell Oil Company 

Shell Offshore Inc 

SWEPI LP 

Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc. 

Shell Consolidated Energy Resources 

Inc. 

Shell Land & Energy Company 

Shell Onshore Ventures Inc. 

Shell Offshore Properties and Capital II, 

Inc. 

Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC 

Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. 

Group III 

BP America Production Company 

BP Exploration & Production Inc. 

BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 

Group IV 

TOTAL E&P USA, Inc. 

Group V 

Chevron Corporation 

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 

Chevron Midcontinent, L.P. 

Unocal Corporation 

Union Oil Company of California 

Pure Partners, L.P. 

Group VI 

ConocoPhillips Company 

ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. 

ConocoPhillips Petroleum Company 

Phillips Pt. Arguello Production 

Company 

Burlington Resources Oil & Gas 

Company LP 

Burlington Resources Offshore Inc. 

The Louisiana Land and Exploration 

Company 

Inexeco Oil Company 

Group VII 

Eni Petroleum Co. Inc. 

Eni Petroleum US LLC 

Eni Oil US LLC 

Eni Marketing Inc. 

Eni BB Petroleum Inc. 

Eni US Operating Co. Inc. 

Eni BB Pipeline LLC 

Group VIII 

Petrobras America Inc. 

Group IX 

StatoilHydro ASA 

Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC 

StatoilHydro USA E&P, Inc. 

StatoilHydro Gulf Properties Inc. 

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Randall B. Luthi, 

Director, Minerals Management Service. 

[FR Doc. E8–23976 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN09OC08.017</GPH>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit  23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-59061, 33-78694 and 33-77341) pertaining to the Immunex
Corporation 1993 Stock Option Plan as Amended and Restated on February 13, 1997,
the Immunex Corporation Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors as Amended
and Restated on February 23, 1999, the Immunex Corporation Profit Sharing 401(k)
Plan and Trust, the Immunex Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan as Amended and
Restated on July 27, 1999 and the Immunex Corporation 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of our report dated January 23, 2001 (except for Note 13 as to
which the date is March 6, 2001), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Immunex Corporation included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                         /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 14, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY D. BERRYMAN;

THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD;

THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT; and

HER SUCCESSORS, A CORPORATION SOLE,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CORRECTED

FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(a)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States' Unopposed Motion

for a Corrected Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) [ECF

No. 111], filed March 16, 2015. For good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States' Unopposed Motion for a Corrected Final

Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) [ECF No. 111], filed March

16, 2015, is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk should correct the final judgment [ECF No. 107], so

that it includes both the judgment against Defendant Berryman for the tax years 1999,

2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, in the amount of $142,595.58, plus other

statutory additions from October 1, 2012, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and

-1-

Case 1:11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM Document 114 Filed 03/18/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full (ECF No. 77, p. 16), and the judgment

against Defendant Berryman for the tax year 1997 in the amount of $395,136.63 as of

December 2, 2013, plus other statutory additions from December 2, 2013, in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in

full. (ECF No. 106, p. 8). 

Dated: March 18, 2015

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM Document 114 Filed 03/18/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99(f)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-1 (the receivables) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-1 has been conducted by Household Retail Services, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented.

 

 

 

/s/ Joe Hoff
/s/ Chuck Colip
Joe Hoff
Chuck Colip
Chief Financial Officer -
Deputy Managing Director/
Household Retail Services
Chief Operating Officer- 
Household Retail Services    
February 28, 2004
February 28, 2004
Date
Date
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Urban von Euler, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 24Holdings Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  August 18, 2004


By: /s/ Urban von Euler
    ----------------------------
    Name:  Urban von Euler
    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02645-DME-CBS

LOST PARK RANCH OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THOMAS A. RIZZI; 

TIMOTHY L. RITCHEY; 

CYNTHIA K. RITCHEY; 

DANIEL J. RIZZI; 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; 

SHIRLEY KINT as PARK COUNT PUBLIC TRUSTEE; and

MICHELLE MILLER as PARK COUNTY TREASURER,

Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE the Court on Plaintiff’s Uncontested Motion to 

Dismiss Without Prejudice [Doc. No. 5]. In reliance upon Plaintiff’s representation that the 

motion is uncontested, the motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this civil action is dismissed without prejudice. 

Each party shall pay its own costs and attorneys' fees. 

DONE AND SIGNED this 9th day of December , 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/ David M. Ebel

U. S. Circuit Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02645-DME-CBS Document 6 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FARAH ELIAS AKELL,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00034-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D01224)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with 

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall 

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no 

later than May 14, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30

th day of March, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Opinion filed March 5, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00014-CR

__________

TRACY CASTENEDA AVILES, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 27th District Court

Bell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 64344

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court convicted Tracy Casteneda Aviles, upon his plea of guilty, of evading 

arrest with a motor vehicle. A plea bargain agreement was not reached. The trial court assessed 

punishment at confinement in a state jail facility for twenty-one months. We dismiss.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is 

supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record 

and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has 

provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record 
and file a response to counsel’s brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel 

has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 

S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); 

and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.CEastland 2005, no pet.).

Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. We note that counsel has the responsibility 

to advise appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Likewise, this 

court advises appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 66. Black v. State, 217 S.W.3d 687 (Tex. App.CEastland 2007, no pet.). 

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

March 5, 2010

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.