alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001025573
<NAME> NATROL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (298)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,891
<PP&E>                                           6,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,997
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,735
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,997
<SALES>                                         29,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,407
<CGS>                                           14,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
#### Virgil Thomas MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

March 16, 1955.

PER CURIAM,

Affirmed.
816 A.2d 1046

#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY FRAGASSE, DEFENDANT-MOVANT.

February 13, 2003.

Leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on the merits.
2AO 458 (Rev. 10/95) Appearance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF

APPEARANCE

Case Number:

To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court.

Date Signature

Print Name Bar Number

Address

City State Zip Code

Phone Number Fax Number

/s/ RORY T. McHALE

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

V.

Plantiff,

Defendant.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

13MJ2694

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART

7/17/2013

Rory T. McHale/ Federal Defenders 289412

225 Broadway, Suite 900

San Diego, CA 92101

(619) 234-8467 (619) 687-2666

Case 3:13-mj-02694-NLS Document 5 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 324-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Counsel for Defendant certifies that the foregoing pleading is true and accurate

to the best of his information and belief, and that a copy of the foregoing document

has been served this day upon: 

U S Attorney CR

Efile.dkt.gc2@usdoj.gov

Dated: July 17, 2013 /s/ Rory T. McHale 

RORY T. McHALE

Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc.

225 Broadway, Suite 900

San Diego, CA 92101-5030

(619) 234-8467 (tel) 

(619) 687-2666 (fax) 

 e-mail: Rory_McHale@fd.org

Case 3:13-mj-02694-NLS Document 5 Filed 07/17/13 Page 2 of 2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 324-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
#### DADE COUNTY HOSPITAL and Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. DILLON and Florida Industrial Commission.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00032-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1529740D

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; Wallach, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

BRITTANY SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss her appeal. Because we have not yet decided 

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: April 23, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1795-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1795-DR), dated September 23, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 26, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 23, 2008.

Jefferson, Jennings, and Harrison Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E8-24078 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Robert M. Livolsi et al., Plaintiffs, v David C. Batterson, Defendant. Robert M. Livolsi et al., Respondents, v Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: In this product liability action based upon a design defect, Supreme Court erred in staying defendant Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment pending disclosure of postaccident raw data generated by defendant’s 1989 safety guard testing program. The discovery sought was not " 'material and necessary’ ” *(Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co.,*21 NY2d 403, 406). The postaccident test data would be relevant only if it were related to the technology of the industry at the time of manufacture *(see, Rainbow v Elia Bldg. Co.,*79 AD2d 287, *affd*56 NY2d 550; *Bolm v Triumph Corp.,*71 AD2d 429, *lv dismissed sub nom. Bolm v Birmingham Small Arms,*50 NY2d 801). Plaintiff failed to demonstrate any nexus between the data sought to be disclosed and the technology of the industry at the time the motorcycle was manufactured. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
1

 “[#22]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

2

 The issues raised by and inherent to the motion for summary judgment are fully briefed,

obviating the necessity for evidentiary hearing or oral argument. Thus, the motion stands submitted on the

briefs. Cf. FED. R. CIV. P. 56(c) and (d). Geear v. Boulder Cmty. Hosp., 844 F.2d 764, 766 (10th

Cir.1988) (holding that hearing requirement for summary judgment motions is satisfied by court's review of

documents submitted by parties).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02310-REB-CBS

CHRISTINE T. HENZE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEYTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23-JT,

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[#22]1

 filed July 25, 2012. The plaintiff filed a response [#23] and the defendant filed a

reply [#24]. I deny the motion.2

I have reviewed the motion, the plaintiff’s response, and the defendant’s reply, as

well as the apposite arguments, authorities, and evidence presented by the parties. I

conclude that there exist genuine issues of material fact that are not appropriate for

summary resolution. Most important, I conclude that the plaintiff’s evidence, while thin,

is sufficient to show genuine issues of material fact on the question of the plaintiff’s

Case 1:11-cv-02310-REB-CBS Document 41 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

membership in a protected class and on the question of whether the defendant’s stated

reasons for its employment actions are pretextual.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#22] filed July 25,

2012, is DENIED; and

2. That counsel are instructed to contact the court’s administrative assistant,

Susan Schmitz, at (303) 335-2350 on Tuesday, October 23, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., to

reschedule the trial preparation conference.

Dated October 19, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02310-REB-CBS Document 41 Filed 10/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24135]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive or Partially 
Exclusive Licensing of Invention

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of 37 CFR 404.4, the Department of 
the Air Force announces the availability for licensing of the invention 
described in Provisional Patent Application no. 61/123,566, entitled 
Object with Durably Bonded Lubricant Layer or Other Functional Coating, 
filed on 1 April 2008, in the USPTO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: The response time to this Notice runs 15 days 
from the date of publication hereof in the Federal Register. Written 
response should be sent to: the Air Force Material Command Law Office, 
AFMC LO/JAZ, 2240 B. Street, Bldg.11, Wright-Patterson AFB 45433-7109, 
attention, Thomas C. Stover. Telephone (937) 255-2838; fax (937) 255-
3733.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-24135 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 9, 2005



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL
ZUGAY                                           
|Michael Zugay Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Frank WALKER.

No. 11066.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1937.

Maurice M. Milligan, U. S. Atty., and Thomas A. Costolow, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Kansas City, Mo.

Mayer, Conkling & Sprague, of St. Joseph, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellant and consent of appellee, without costs to either party in this court.
816 A.2d 1046

#### JORGE O. CAVIGLIA AND MABEL BRUN CAVIGLIA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ROYAL TOURS OF AMERICA AND HECTOR MUNDO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS.

February 28, 2003.

Leave to appeal is granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1794-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1794-DR), dated September 22, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 26, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 22, 2008.

Hancock and Harrison Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

Washington County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E8-24091 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joseph Lee Ferguson

, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR24 444

.

Vs. No. 11

- 17

- 00 0 81

- CR * February 21 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher , J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          33,254
<SECURITIES>                                    83,218
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,042)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,811
<PP&E>                                          28,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,974)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           504
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,801)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,216
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                             EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



         We have issued our reports dated November 1, 1999,  accompanying  the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ciprico Inc. and subsidiaries
which are incorporated by reference or included in their Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 1999. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Ciprico Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-47840, File No.
33-78116, File No. 33-64999, File No. 33-65001, File No. 333-02931, File No.
333-02933, File No. 333-42841, File No. 333-42843 and File No. 333-42845).




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 9, 1999
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02683-RBJ-KMT

ELLEN WESSLER and

MONTY WESSLER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COLONIAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE, a division of COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A., 

WELLS FARGO BANK,

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRY SYSTEMS, INC., 

CASTLE STAWIARSKI, LLC,

JOHN or JANE DOES 1-1000, Unknown Investors,

JOHN ROES 1-20, Undisclosed mortgage aggregators, mortgage originators, loan sellers, 

trustees of pooled assets, and/or trustees for holders of certificates of collateralized mortgage 

obligations, and all unknown persons who claim any interest in the subject matter of this action,

Defendants.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on February 4, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 

A Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference is set for January 25, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.

Counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to 

address: jury instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, 

stipulations as to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

Case 1:11-cv-02683-RBJ-KMT Document 53 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

DATED this 27th day of March, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02683-RBJ-KMT Document 53 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2