alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rose K. Oursler, Plaintiff, *v.*Albert L. Cole, as Executor of Charles F. Oursler, Deceased, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 25, 1957.

*Leight, Drimmer & Weinstein*for plaintiff.

*Lord, Day & Lord*for defendant.

Samuel H. Hofstadter, J.

Motion for an order directing the clerk to enter judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $17,354.15, pursuant to the order of February 10, 1956, confirming the award is granted. There is nothing in the order of February 10, 1956, which denies the plaintiff’s right to interest from the date of the award pursuant to sections 480 and 1464 of the Civil Practice Act. The court is, therefore, constrained to allow interest from the date of the award *(Matter of East India Trading Co. [Hatari],*280 App. Div. 420, affd. 305 N. Y. 866). Though the defendant appears to have been ready to pay the award as rendered and the plaintiff refused to accept payment pending *4the appeal from the order of confirmation (2 A D 2d 964), the defendant did not stop the running of interest by paying the money into court. The court is, therefore, without discretion to withhold the interest which accrued on the award. No costs are allowed. Settle order, which shall direct payment of the judgment in accordance with the memorandum on the companion motion filed herewith.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02757-RBJ-CBS

JOEL SANTOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

AGFEED INDUSTRIES, INC., a Nevada corporation

GERARD DAIGNAULT,

EDWARD PAZDRO,

SONGYAN LI, and

JUNHONG XIONG,

Defendants.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

Case 1:11-cv-02757-RBJ Document 2 Filed 10/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 26th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02757-RBJ Document 2 Filed 10/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02596-MSK-KLM

PRIDE SERVICES, INC., a Colorado corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation;

CALVIN BLACK, in his official and individual capacities; and

ONE OR MORE JOHN DOES,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02596-RM-KLM Document 4 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02596-RM-KLM Document 4 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 34 Filed 05/02/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.209 Treasury Securities** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Information Security Oversight Office


Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB); Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 1102 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism 
Prevention Act of 2004 which extended and modified the Public Interest 
Declassification Board (PIDB) as established by the Public Interest 
Declassification Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-567, title VII, December 27, 
2000, 114 Stat. 2856), announcement is made for the following committee 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Public Interest Declassification Board (PIDB).
    Date of Meeting: Friday, October 31, 2008.
    Time of Meeting: 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: National Archives and Records Administration, 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 105, Washington, DC 20408.
    Purpose: To discuss the issue of identifying and prioritizing the 
declassification review of ``historically significant'' information as 
described in Issue 2 of the Board's report to the President, titled 
Improving Declassification. Copies of the report are located at the 
following Web site:
    http://www.archives.gov/declassification/pidb/improving-declassification.pdf.
    This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space 
limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of 
individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Information 
Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Wednesday, October 29, 
2008. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining access to 
the location of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie A. Agurkis, PIDB Staff, 
Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives Building, 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 
357-5308.

    Dated: October 7, 2008.
William J. Bosanko,
Director, Information Security Oversight Office.
 [FR Doc. E8-24313 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
Exhibit 13


                                                               February 24, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities
and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not
to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not
constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the "Report) accompanying
this letter.

         Michel Landel, the Chief Executive Officer of Sodexho Alliance, SA
("Sodexho"), and Sian Herbert-Jones, the Chief Financial Officer of Sodexho,
each certifies that, to the best of his and her knowledge, respectively:

    o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        Sodexho.


By:    /s/ Michel Landel
       --------------------------------------------
       Name:  Michel Landel
       Title:  Chief Executive Officer


By:    /s/ Sian Herbert-Jones
       --------------------------------------------
       Name:  Sian Herbert-Jones
       Title:  Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Harold Gordon JAILETTE, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frank STOUTAMIRE, as Sheriff of Leon County, Florida, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Leo P. Kitchen and Dan R. Schwartz, both of Jacksonville, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lone Moose Adventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Christopher B. Glover, President and Director and Michael Brown,
Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 7/11/03                         /s/Christopher B. Glover
                                      Christopher B. Glover
                                      President and director


Date: 7/11/03                         /s/Michael Brown
                                      Michael Brown
                                      Secretary/Treasurer and director
Exhibit 99(c)

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC" Finance")

HFC REVOLVING CORPORATION

HOUSEHOLD HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-2

 

	I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance (the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 7, 2001 among HFC Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, Master Servicer and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.  (as Successor in Interest to Bank One, National Association ), as Trustee, (the "Agreement")  that:

A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1 through

December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the Agreement throughout such Year. Based on such review, the Master Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth below.

			NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.                              

 

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer

 

						/s/ Steven H. Smith			
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02341-LTB

JOHN MOORE, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

COLORADO SUPREME COURT CASE #2011SC144, 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Enter into Evidence (Doc. No. 5)

filed by Plaintiff on September 15, 2011. This case was dismissed by an order and

judgment filed on September 13, 2011. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as

inappropriate.

Dated: September 19, 2011
#### Louis ZIEGER v. VON KOZLOW REALTY COMPANY, Debtor, et al.

No. 7739.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1938.

Lucking, Van Auken & Sprague, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Shapero & Shapero, Fixel & Fixel, and D. B. Frederick, all of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before MOORMAN and HICKS, Circuit Judges, and SWINFORD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for hearing on appeal under section 24b of the Acts of Congress relating to bankruptcy, 11 U.S.C.A. § 47(b).

It appears that a restraining order previously issued by the lower court was dissolved January 3, 1938, by reason whereof appellant Louis Zieger is now able to proceed with a certain mechanic’s lien foreclosure sale, which the lower court had previously restrained. The questions on this appeal are therefore moot. For the protection of all parties in interest, it is ordered that this cause be discontinued on the docket but subject to be reinstated.
EXHIBIT 11

NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Statement of Computation of Earnings per Share

(Amounts in Thousands  Except Per Share Data)



|                                           |  |                                   |        |                                 |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                           |  | For the Three MonthsEnded June 30 |        | For the Six MonthsEnded June 30
|                                           |  | 2006                              |        | 2005                            |   | 2006   |  | 2005
|Net income                                 |  | $                                 | 16,398 |                                 | $ | 6,459  |  | $    | 21,984 |  | $ | 11,148
|                                           |  |                                   |        |                                 |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Weighted average common shares outstanding |  |                                   | 15,005 |                                 |   | 15,005 |  |      | 15,005 |  |   | 15,005
|                                           |  |                                   |        |                                 |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |       
|Basic and diluted earnings per share       |  | $                                 | 1.09   |                                 | $ | .43    |  | $    | 1.47   |  | $ | .74   
|                                           |  |                                   |        |                                 |   |        |  |      |        |  |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ABEL SANCHEZ-LEON,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG B. SHAFFER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s “Unopposed Motion to Reconsider Appointment of 

Counsel from the CJA Panel” (doc. #491) is GRANTED. CJA counsel Mr. David L. Owen, Jr. shall be 

appointed to represent Defendant Sanchez-Leon.

DATED: March 19, 2013
Case 1:11-cv-02751-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02751-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo – Sabesp (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dilma Seli Pena, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 27, 2012  By:/s/ Dilma Seli Pena Name:    Dilma Seli Pena Title:       Chief Executive Officer




---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02756–MSK–KMT

GREG WILKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 

Defendant.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

This matter comes before me sua sponte. To eschew the appearance of impropriety, I

conclude that I must recuse myself from this case.

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(a) provides, “(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the

United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might

reasonably be questioned.” See United States v. Pearson, 203 F.3d 1243, 1264 (10th Cir. 2000).

However, a “judge should not recuse himself on unsupported, irrational, or highly tenuous

speculation.” Hinman v. Rogers, 831 F.2d. 937, 939 (10th Cir. 1987).

One of my family members owns stock in Level 3 Communications. Under these

circumstances, the court’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. 

Case 1:11-cv-02756-WYD-BNB Document 7 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Therefore, it is ORDERED:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), I hereby RECUSE myself from all further involvement

in this case. The Clerk’s Office shall randomly draw and assign another Magistrate Judge to this

case.

It is further ORDERED

The Scheduling Conference current set for January 18, 2012 at 9:45 a.m. is VACATED.

Dated this 30th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02756-WYD-BNB Document 7 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.2**

**Certification**

** **

I, Preston A. Miller, Executive Vice President and Treasurer ofAmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certify that:

 

1.                     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, andall reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed inrespect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofAmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2002-1;

 

2.                     Based on my knowledge, the information in thesereports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                     Based on my knowledge, the servicing informationrequired to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale andservicing agreement is included in these reports;

 

4.                     I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponthe review required under the sale and servicing agreement, and except asdisclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under thesale and servicing agreement; and

 

5.                     I have disclosed any significant deficiencies relatingto the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth inthe sale and servicing agreement to the registrant’s certified publicaccountants.

 
| Date: January 29, 2003 |                                    |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                   |                                    |
|                   |                                    | /s/ Preston A. Miller |   |
|                   | Preston A. Miller                       |
|                   | Executive Vice  President and Treasurer |

 

----
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 47 Filed 03/26/07 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 47 Filed 03/26/07 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:02-cv-00133-ZLW Document 47 Filed 03/26/07 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code), theundersigned officer of TeliaSonera AB, a Swedish company (the “*Company*”), hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

1)                theAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005(the “*Report*”)  fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

2)                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ ANDERS IGEL |
|--------|--------|-----------------|
|   |   | Name:           |   | Anders Igel |
|   |   | Title:          |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Date:           |   | June 27, 2006 |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02648-PAB-KLM

GUILLERMO H. GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE GEO GROUP, INC.,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

This matter is before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Dismissal [Docket No.

13]. On November 15, 2011, plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Docket No. 14].

Thus, the Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and the

Motion for Dismissal [Docket No. 13] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading. 

See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) (“a pleading

that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies”) (internal

quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is

ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Dismissal [Docket No. 13] is DENIED as

moot.

DATED November 16, 2011.

Case 1:11-cv-02648-PAB-KLM Document 15 Filed 11/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1