alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02637-RBJ-CBS

NIKI DANE AND MATTHEW DANE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Defendant.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02637-RBJ Document 2 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Order entered November 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00031
- CV YOUNG YOO, IRVING SU PERMART, L.L.C. AND ACACIA LAS LOMAS, L. L.C., Appellant s V. A
- 1 MA RKETING, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 05632



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal which we abated for the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why the reporter’s recor d of certain trial court proceedings had not been filed. Because the missing portion of the reporter’s record has now been received , we VACATE our September 30, 2019 order directing court reporter Vielica Dobbins not sit as a reporter until the record is filed and o ur November 7, 2019 order abating the appeal.
We ORDER the record received November 8, 2019 filed as of the date of this order

. With the record now complete, we further ORDER appellants to file their brief on the merits no later than December 12, 2019.We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Dale

Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134 th Judicial District Court; the Honorable Bridgett N. Whitmore, Presiding Judge of the 193 rd Judicial District Court and the c ourt for which Ms. Dobbins is currently the official reporter; Ms. Dobbins; the Dallas County Auditor’s Office; and, the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.7 Distribution of National Income1** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,000
<SECURITIES>                                24,209,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,005,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,121,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,016,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,740,000
<PP&E>                                       5,094,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,703,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,962,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,687,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       113,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,962,000
<SALES>                                     26,397,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,397,000
<CGS>                                       18,454,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,454,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,089,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                170,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby
consent to the references to our firm, in the context in which they appear, and to the references to and incorporation of our report dated February 3, 2010, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gastar Exploration Ltd. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009, as well as in the notes to the financial statements included therein.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/ C.H. (SCOTT) REESC.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

March 15, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF

J. ROE BUCKLEY / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, J. Roe Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation,
Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



/s/ J. Roe BuckleyName:

J. Roe BuckleyDate:

March 31, 2008
#### Nicholas J. BALESTRIERI, Appellant, v. J. Lawrence KELLEY et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Snedigar & Baya, of Miami, for appellant.

Marshall F. Sanders, of Miami, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for -appellant
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50186 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JULIO PLACENCIA-CHAVEZ, also known as Fren Mata Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1870-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, Julio Placencia-Chavez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,295]


Visteon Corporation Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC, Fuel 
Delivery--Climate Group Division, Concordia, MO; Notice of Negative 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On September 4, 2008, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on September 18, 2008 (73 FR 54171).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of automotive fuel tanks did not 
contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no 
shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    The petitioner requested that workers of Visteon Corporation 
Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC, Fuel Delivery--Climate Group 
Division, Concordia, Missouri be considered eligible for TAA as a 
secondary affected company. The petitioner provided a list of TAA 
certified companies to which the subject firm allegedly supplied 
components during the relevant time period.
    A company official was contacted to verify whether the subject firm 
supplied automotive fuel tanks to the companies and locations provided 
by the petitioner. The company official stated that Visteon Corporation 
Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC, Fuel Delivery--Climate Group 
Division, Concordia, Missouri did not directly sell to these certified 
locations and that these specific production facilities were not 
customers of the subject firm during the relevant time period. The 
Department conducted a further investigation and determined that none 
of the customers of the subject firm were certified eligible for TAA 
during the relevant time period.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Visteon Corporation Regional Assembly 
& Manufacturing LLC, Fuel Delivery--Climate Group Division, Concordia, 
Missouri.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of October 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-24125 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                                                      Exhibit 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K FOR
THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,  1999,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      548,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               618,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                291,000
<INVENTORY>                               1,513,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         10,582,000
<PP&E>                                    7,248,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,113,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           18,492,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     8,532,000
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                  2,890,000<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                3,620,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             18,492,000
<SALES>                                   2,657,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,360,000
<CGS>                                     2,234,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             9,941,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          368,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (6,949,000)<F3>
<INCOME-TAX>                            (3,002,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,438,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              509,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                            (2,929,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .56

<FN>
<F1> NET OF RESERVE OF $378,000
<F2> 1,519,440 TOTAL COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
<F3> BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST OF $509,000
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of David A. Rivera, Respondent, v Erie County Board of Elections et al., Respondents, and City of Buffalo et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition dismissed, and designating petition invalidated. Memorandum: Article 2-A of the Charter of the City of Buffalo requires that candidates for seats on the Buffalo Common Council reside in the district in which they *977run for at least one year prior to the election. Supreme Court erroneously found that the one-year requirement could be satisfied by residency in the district for any one-year period during the candidate’s lifetime. We should not attribute to the City Counsel such an absurd intent. It is obvious that the council intended that the one-year period immediately precede the date of the election *(see,*McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 145).

Further, we conclude that the one-year residency requirement is constitutional *(see, Joseph v City of Birmingham,*510 F Supp 1319; Annotation, *Validity of Requirement that Candidate or Public Officer have been Resident of Governmental Unit for Specified Period,*65 ALR3d 1048, § 22, at 1091-1093). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J. —Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

U.S. Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice

Criminal Case No.: 11-po-00040-GJR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH B. FRIGO,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL TO COURT AND MOTION HEARING

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE GUDRUN J. RICE

DATED: January 03, 2012

It is hereby ORDERED that this matter is set for a half-day trial to the Court

beginning on March 19, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice at

U.S. Courthouse, Wayne Aspinall Federal Building, 400 Rood Avenue, Room 323,

Grand Junction, Colorado, 81501. The provisions of the Local Rules of this Court and

Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall be followed by the prosecution and the defense.

IT IS ORDERED, that all motions in this case be filed on or before February 20,

2012.

IT IS ORDERED, that all responses to motions in this case be filed on or before

February 29, 2012.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.











/s/ John W. Finke____________


John W. Finke


President and Chief Executive Officer


October 29, 2009
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

#### **CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (see File No. 333-17883, effective December31, 1996) of our report dated February 24, 2006 with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP, Inc. andSubsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ HOLTZ  RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| HOLTZ  RUBENSTEIN REMINICK LLP     |
| Melville,  New York                |
| March 26,  2006                    |

 

1

----
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-51053 Summary Calendar

JOEL GARCIA-GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES O F AMERICA; BUREAU O F P R ISONS; WARDEN, RCDC III; GEO GROUP; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondents-Appellees

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CV-79
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joel Garcia-Gonzalez, feder a l p r i s o n e r # 8 9 3 2 6

- 0 7 9 , a n a l i e n a g a i n st whom t h e B u reau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement has issued a d etainer subjecting him to immediate removal from the United States u pon r elease from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) custody, moves this court to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the denial o f h is 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the BOP’s exclusio n of him from rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. His U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D February 26, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-51053 Document: 00512156396 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2013No. 12-51053

arguments are foreclosed by this court’s decision in Gallegos-Hernandez v. United States , 688 F.3d 190, 192-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 561 (2012). Accordingly, Garcia-Gonzalez’s motion t o proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5 T H C I R . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-51053 Document: 00512156396 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2013
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROY G. CLARKE,

Appellant,

v.

THE FROST NATIONAL BANK

,

Appell ee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00310

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 318797 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s Order Granting Motion to Revive Dormant

Judgment, and Order that it be denied without pr ejudice

. We further order that Appellee recover

from Appellant all costs of appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 6 TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

L ISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,185
<SECURITIES>                                     3,236
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,662<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     14,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,068
<PP&E>                                          43,844
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,677
<BONDS>                                          3,649
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,809
<SALES>                                         45,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,180
<CGS>                                           25,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,691
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42

<FN>
<F1>note: receivables shown net of allowance of 430
</FN>




</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1
 
 Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, Steven M.
Schneider, Director and Chief Executive Officer of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)
    such
      Form 10QSB of ZAP for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months
      ended March 31, 2005,fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of ZAP .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ****Date: May 13, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Steve
  SchneiderSteve SchneiderDirector
      and
      Chief
      Executive Officer
Order entered March 25 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00075

- CV

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. AND TOY OTA MOTOR

CORPORATION, Appellant s

V.

BENJAMIN THO M AS REAVIS AND KRISTI CAROL REAVIS,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF E.R. AND O.R., MINOR CHILDREN, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 16

- 15296

O RDER

On the Court ’ s own motion, thi s appeal i s REMOV ED from submission on

April 7, 2020. T he case will be reset for submission in due cours e.

/s/ DAVID J. S CHENCK

PRESIDING JUSTICE