alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6505

AARON B. ROBERTS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN J. PHILLIP MORGAN; BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 04011

- GLR )

Submitted : August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Aaron B. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Aaron B. Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion , in which Roberts asked the district court to set aside its order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appea lability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When t he district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debata ble claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roberts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap peal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>




   <ARTICLE> 5
          
   <S>                            <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
   <PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
   <PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
   <CASH>                           2,224,202
   <SECURITIES>                             0
   <RECEIVABLES>                    1,135,309
   <ALLOWANCES>                             0
   <INVENTORY>                         89,045
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                 3,693,942
   <PP&E>                           1,635,962
   <DEPRECIATION>                   1,308,652
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                   4,131,161
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              320,915
   <BONDS>                                  0
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
   <PREFERRED>                              0
   <COMMON>                         2,813,248
   <OTHER-SE>                         976,248
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     4,131,161
   <SALES>                            215,462
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                   881,581
   <CGS>                              607,201
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                   241,517
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     251
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                    212,398
   <INCOME-TAX>                        53,302
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      0
   <DISCONTINUED>                           0
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
   <CHANGES>                                0
   <NET-INCOME>                       159,096
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                          .05
   <EPS-DILUTED>                          .05
           
   
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99(j)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2002-3 (the receivables) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of private label credit card receivables owned by Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2002-3 has been conducted by Household Retail Services, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated June 12, 2001, as supplemented.

 

 

/s/ Joe Hoff
/s/ Chuck Colip
Joe Hoff
Chuck Colip
Chief Financial Officer -
Deputy Managing Director/
Household Retail Services
Chief Operating Officer- 
Household Retail Services    
February 28, 2004
February 28, 2004
Date
Date
IV 

House Calendar No. 161 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 839 

[Report No. 110–471] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2007 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of December 5, 2007, pro6 viding for consideration of the Senate amendments to the 

7 bill (H.R. 6) to reduce our Nation’s dependency on foreign 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 839 RH 

1 oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy 

2 resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, 

3 developing greater efficiency, and creating a Strategic En4 ergy Efficiency and Renewables Reserve to invest in alter5 native energy, and for other purposes. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 161 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 839 

[Report No. 110

–471] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 4, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 August 26, 2005 Before Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge Nos. 02-4222 & 02-4224 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. ROBERT T. MITRIONE and MARLA A. DEVORE,

Defendants-Appellants

. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois No. 00-CR-30021 Jeanne E. Scott, Judge

. O R D E R After our limited remand under United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir. 2005), the district judge concluded, unequivocally, that knowledge about the advisory status of the sentencing guidelines would not have affected her decision. She would have imposed the same sentence as originally imposed on both Robert Mitrione and Marla DeVore. Those sentences, we conclude, could not be viewed as unreasonable. Accordingly, the defendants’ objections to their sentences are rejected, and the judgments under appeal are AFFIRMED. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02658-RBJ-BNB

MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,

Plaintiff.

v.

CREEK SIDE AT PARKER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Colorado corporation, 

MOUNTAIN VIEW HOMES I, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, 

MOUNTAIN VIEW HOMES II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, 

MICHAEL LASTOWSKI, individually, a Colorado resident and citizen, 

NATIONAL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

Case 1:11-cv-02658-RBJ Document 3 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 13th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02658-RBJ Document 3 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2385]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials; Revised

    The 186th Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials 
(ACNW&M) meeting scheduled to be held February 12-14, 2008, Room T-2B3, 
Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland has 
been revised as noted below. Notice of this meeting was previously 
published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 (73 FR 
5235-5236).
    The discussion of the item listed as the Semiannual Briefing by the 
Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, scheduled between 
10:05 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, has been 
cancelled.
    The discussion of ACNW&M Letter Reports previously scheduled 
between 11:30 a.m. and 12 p.m. on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, will be 
scheduled between 10:05 a.m. and 12 p.m. that same day.
    The discussion of the item listed as Draft Guidance on Preventing 
Legacy Sites, scheduled between 1 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 12, 2008, has been cancelled.
    A new discussion listed as International Commission on Radiological 
Protection (ICRP) Recommendations--Final Report 103 has been added for 
Tuesday, February 12, 2008, between 1 p.m. and 1:30 p.m.
    The discussion of the item listed as Corrosion of Waste Package and 
Spent Fuel Dissolution in a Repository Environment previously scheduled 
between 2:45 p.m. and 4 p.m. on February 12, 2008, will be scheduled 
from 1:45 p.m. to 3 p.m. that same day.
    The discussion of ACNW&M Letters and Reports previously scheduled 
between 4 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. on February 12, 2008, will be scheduled 
between 3 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. that same day.
    For further information, contact Mr. Antonio L. Dias, (Telephone 
301-415-6805), between 6:45 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., EST.

    Dated: February 4, 2008.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Office.
[FR Doc. E8-2385 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### PINHOLSTER v. PIETRO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without, opinion..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                            
                 This schedule contains summary financial information
                 extracted from the financial statements of Obie Media
                 Corporation which are included in its quarterly report,
                 Form 10-QSB, for the quarter ended May 31, 1997
                 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
                 statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        May-31-1997
<CASH>                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,688,818
<ALLOWANCES>                          124,490
<INVENTORY>                                 0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    2,724,630
<PP&E>                             12,096,096
<DEPRECIATION>                      3,135,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     12,279,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,963,464
<BONDS>                             7,000,938
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                            6,140,172
<OTHER-SE>                         (3,037,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       12,279,168
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    5,782,089
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       3,067,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      153,677
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    290,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      556,097
<INCOME-TAX>                         215,676
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  340,421
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         340,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .10
<FN>
<F1>                            Information not included in Financial Statements
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ January 2 9 , 20 2 1

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 20 20

- 1266

DEBORAH N. MOUTON

- MILLER , P

etitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD , Respondent

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Intervenor

Decided: January 19 , 20 2 1 Precedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change s :
On page 9, line 2 2 , change “3312 (a)(2) ” to “3321 (a)(2) ”

. On page 9, line 2 7 , change “3312 (a)(2) ” to “3321 (a)(2) ”

. On page 9, line 2 8 , change “3312 (a) ” to “3321 (a) ”

. On page 9, line 3 2 , change “3312 (a)(1) ” to “3321 (a)(1) ”

. On page 9, line 3 5 , change “3312” to “3321”

. On page 10, line 9 , change “3312” to “3321”

. On page 10, line 13 , change “3312” to “3321”

. On page 12, line 8, change “3312” to “3321”

. Case: 20-1266 Document: 55 Page: 1 Filed: 01/29/2021
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
January 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 135566 (14) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices MARK EARL WHITE, #228524,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135566 CoA: 281030 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $13.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $362.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
January 3, 2008
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40987

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SAUL LARA-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:12-CR-800-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Saul Lara-Perez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lara-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40987 Document: 00512598417 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40987

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40987 Document: 00512598417 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
1

Filed 5/24/17

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

) S225193

v. )

) Ct. App. 4/2 E060758

RON DOUGLAS PATTERSON, )

) Riverside County

Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. EE220540

____________________________________) 

 

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT:

The opinion filed herein on March 27, 2017, appearing at 2 Cal.5th 885, is 

modified as follows:

The first sentence of the second paragraph on page 901 is revised to read: “To 

establish that he was prejudiced by counsel‟s alleged errors, Patterson must show „that 

a reasonable probability exists that, but for counsel‟s incompetence, he would not 

have pled guilty‟ (Resendiz, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 253) to the charge of possession of 

MDMA, which subjected him to mandatory deportation.”

This modification does not affect the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, INC. DATED MARCH 31,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,056
<SECURITIES>                                    16,982
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,531
<PP&E>                                          14,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,838
<BONDS>                                          4,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,027
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,849
<SALES>                                          4,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,346
<CGS>                                            7,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>