alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (08-071)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing. 

# DATES:

October 9, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan A. Geurts, Patent Counsel, Goddard Space Flight Center, Mail Code 140.1, Greenbelt, MD 20771-0001; telephone (301) 286-7351; fax (301) 286-9502. 

*NASA Case No. GSC-15349-1:*                         Multiple Frequency Optical Mixer and Demultiplexer and Apparatus for Remote Sensing;                     

*NASA Case No. GSC-15483-1:*                         A Method and Apparatus for Relative Navigation Using Reflected GPS Signals;                     

*NASA Case No. GSC-15136-1:*                         Blocking Contacts for N-Type Cadmium Zinc Telluride;                     

*NASA Case No. GSC-15470-1:*                         Broadband Planar Magic-T with Low-Phase and Amplitude Imbalance.                     

Dated: October 3, 2008. 

Michael C. Wholley, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E8-24059 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Incentra Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Anthony DiPaolo, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:
     
August 6, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Anthony DiPaolo    
|-------------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|                           |  |     | Anthony DiPaolo        
|                           |  |     | Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02611-PAB-MEH

DELORES MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUSTIN KRAAL,

THE ESTATE OF AUSTIN KRAAL, and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation

authorized to do business in the State of Colorado,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Dismissal of Defendant Austin

Kraal [Docket No. 17], in which plaintiff requests dismissal of defendant Austin Kraal

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Despite Rule 41(a)(1)’s reference to the

dismissal of an “action,” the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all defendants. See Montoya v. FedEx

Ground Package System, Inc., 614 F.3d 145, 148 (5th Cir. 2010); Blaize-Sampeur v.

McDowell, 2007 WL 1958909, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. June 29, 2007) (noting that, although the

Second Circuit had previously stated otherwise, it had “since adopted the approach of

the majority of courts in other circuits – that is, that Rule 41(a) does not require

dismissal of the action in its entirety” and permits dismissal of all claims as to a single

defendant). Upon the filing of the Notice of Dismissal [Docket No. 17], this action was

dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Austin Kraal. 

Case 1:11-cv-02611-PAB-MEH Document 20 Filed 04/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

DATED April 13, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02611-PAB-MEH Document 20 Filed 04/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: June 9, 2005Release dates | 
 Coded tables | 
 Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | 
 PDF (450 KB)
L.227 Investment in Bank Personal Trusts and Estates
   Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted                                                                                             
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Description
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004   Q1
2004   Q2
2004   Q3
2004   Q4
2005   Q1
LineBank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	932.4
	936.9
	935.4
	919.2
	957.6
	940.1
	1Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	932.4
	936.9
	935.4
	919.2
	957.6
	940.1
	2
|
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Release dates | 
Coded tables | 
Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releasesHome | Economic research and
dataAccessibility | Contact Us Last update: June 9, 2005
AO 467 (Rev. 01/09) Order Requiring a Defendant to Appear in the District Where Charges are Pending and Transferring Bail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

District of Colorado

United States of America

Case No. tem} -OUNT ~(CLWY)

)
Vv. )
: ) :
Col li iad Dunaars ) Charging District: OU thern Or strict 12) € FL.
Defendant ) Charging District's Case No. ||- all ~adRo

ORDER REQUIRING A DEFENDANT TO APPEAR IN THE DISTRICT
WHERE CHARGES ARE PENDING AND TRANSFERRING BAIL

After a hearing in this court, the defendant is released from custody and ordered to appear in the district court
where the charges are pending to answer those charges. If the time to appear in that court has not yet been set, the
defendant must appear when notified to do so. Otherwise, the time and place to appear in that court are:

Place: west ile Beach Digisional Of fcourtroom No.: MAG shretle Sie Mhasn
TEL Lie gS oah FL 2a Date and Time: jO/|2/301 @ a-m.

The clerk is ordered to transfer any bail deposited in the registry of this court to the clerk of the court whete the
charges are pending.

Date: 9 { 26/ Ll Sz AM,

Judge's signature

KRISTEN LMEX “
US. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OISTRICT OF COLORADO
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

JENSEN EDWARD THOMAS , Petitioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0 797 PRPC

Appeal from the Superior Court in Yuma County

No. S1400CR201300151 The Honorable Lawrence C. Kenworthy, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DEN IED

COUNSEL

Yum a County Attorney’s Office
, Yuma By Charles V. S. Platt Counsel for Respondent

Jensen Edward Thomas , Florence Petitioner FILED 5-15-2018STATE v. THOMAS Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Jon W. Thompson, Judge Peter B. Swann, and Judge James P. Beene delivered the decision of the Court.

P E R C U R I U M :
¶1 Petitioner Jensen Edward Thomas seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- con viction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 576

- 77, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion in denying the petition. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not shown an abuse of discretion.
¶4 Accordingly, we grant review and deny rel ief.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 22, 2010 | /s/      Sharon Tang                                                                           |   |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Sharon      TangChief      Financial Officer (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
**Exhibit 10.2**

 
|  | ** ** | 25 Orinda WayOrinda,  CA 94563t.  925 253 4500f.  925 253 4599www.intraware.com |
|--|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

August 1, 2005

 

Peter H. Jackson

Chairman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President

Intraware, Inc.

25 Orinda Way

Orinda, CA 94563

 

Dear Peter:

 

I am delighted to informyou that the Compensation Committee has approved the following bonus plan foryou for the 2006 fiscal year.  You willbe eligible to receive a cash bonus of $150,000 if Intraware achieves certaincorporate goals with respect to:

 

1.               Intraware’s annualrevenue growth between fiscal years 2005 and 2006,

 

2.               decrease in Intraware’sloss from operations between fiscal years 2005 and 2006,

 

3.               Intraware’s netcash provided from operating activities in fiscal year 2006, and

 

4.               Intraware’s cashbalance at the end of fiscal year 2006, net of amounts payable as bonuses.

 

The specific dollaramount associated with each goal will be communicated to you separately by theCompensation Committee.

 

Any bonus will be paidwithin 15 days after the issuance of the fiscal year-end audit report byIntraware’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2006 fiscalyear.  Any payout of a bonus is subjectto final approval by the Compensation Committee.

 
| Very truly yours,            |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ MELINDA ERICKS           |   |
|                         |
| Melinda Ericks               |
| Director of Human  Resources |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify
that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                        
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/ BRUCE W. TAYLOR                    
|                         |  | Bruce W. Taylor Chief Executive
Officer
|                         | 
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/ ROBIN VANCASTLE                    
|                         |  | Robin VanCastle Chief Financial
Officer



66
1

 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin, who as of

Feb. 14, 2013 has been named as the Acting Commissioner, is automatically substituted for Michael J.

Astrue as the defendant in this suit.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02654-REB

SETH M. WESHNAK,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.1

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in

accordance with the Order Affirming Commissioner [#23] entered by Judge Robert E.

Blackburn on March 25, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the conclusion of the Commissioner through

the Administrative Law Judge that plaintiff was not disabled is AFFIRMED.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of March, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02654-REB Document 24 Filed 03/27/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-19-009; Docket No. ER05-168-008 (Consolidated); Docket 
No. ER06-274-012 (Not Consolidated)]


Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, et al. v. Southwestern Public 
Service Company; Notice of Filing

October 2, 2008.
    On September 30, 2008, Southwestern Public Service Company, on 
behalf of itself, Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc., Lyntegar 
Electric Cooperative, Inc., Occidental Permian Ltd. and Occidental 
Power Marketing, L.P., filed an Amendment No. 3 to its Offer of 
Settlement and Settlement Agreement filed on December 3, 2007 and 
approved by the Commission on April 21, 2008 in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#30767562737f5e5c595e55634540405f424470565542531e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4e2e1f6e7ebcac8cdcac1f7d1d4d4cbd6d0e4c2c1d6c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 6, 2008.

Nathaniel Davis,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23936 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months
ended March 31, 2003, Steven M. Schneider, Director and Chief Executive Officer
of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the three months ended March 31, 2003,fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
     Securities Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months
     ended March 31, 2003,fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.






/s/  Steve  Schneider
------------------------------------
Steve  Schneider
Director and Chief Executive Officer


May 12, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB Date: October 11, 2012 

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 

 Parties Attorney(s) 

SINGE MARTIN Skye K. Myers 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

CANON BUSINESS SOUTIONS, INC Jeannette M. Brook 

Natalia S. Ballinger 

 Defendant(s) 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

MOTIONS HEARING

Court in Session: 3:27 p.m. 

Appearances of counsel. 

Argument presented on [32] Motion to Enforce Compliance Discovery Order and For Sanctions. 

ORDERED: Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

 DENIED in respect to compel additional discovery as to attached exhibit 36. 

 GRANTED in respect to disclose information as to account representatives. 

These disclosures are due on or before October 18, 2012. 

 Request for sanctions is DENIED. 

 Response to Summary Judgment is due on or before December 3, 2012. 

 

Case 1:11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB Document 48 Filed 10/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

 Pretrial conference currently set for November 1, 2012 is VACATED and 

reset to February 5, 2013 at 8:30 a.m., proposed Pretrial Order to be 

submitted on or before January 29, 2013. 

Court in Recess: 4:22 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:55

Case 1:11-cv-02565-WJM-BNB Document 48 Filed 10/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### HIGHSMITH v. OCEAN ACCIDENT & GUARANTEE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 21-10506

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cr-00105-RAH-KFP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODNEY MCGHEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Alabama

________________________

(July 30, 2021)

Before LUCK, LAGOA and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

USCA11 Case: 21-10506 Date Filed: 07/30/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of 

the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

USCA11 Case: 21-10506 Date Filed: 07/30/2021 Page: 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6163
DAVID R. REDMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; WILLIE WELDON; SHERRY LOPEZ; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; ANGELA P. RUIZ; OFFICER GROVIER; GLENDA HINMAN; JEAN RANDALL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-488-4-17AK) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. Montgomery , No. CA-96-488-4-17AK (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED