alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND
        (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

            Dated:  February 9, 2007                  /S/ANDREW R. PERZ
                  ---------------------            --------------------------
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Jeffrey T. BentonJeffrey T. BentonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned herebycertifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital FundLLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

 

(a)                    the AnnualReport of the Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations ofthe Fund for such period.

 

 

Date: February 29,2008

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Andrew C. Frenette   Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fundand will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00399-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. BRANDON HENRY,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on January 9, 2012. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for January 19, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the

documents are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no

exceptions to this policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them

an original and one (1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See 

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 

1. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for January 19, 2012, is VACATED;

and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for the change of

plea hearing. 

Dated: January 9, 2012
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00315-CR

NICHOLAS GARCIA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21-CRF-0078-2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 8, 2024
Case 1:11-cv-02655-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02655-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02655-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4909

ASHLEY RICHARD FOLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Graham C. Mullen, District Judge.

(CR-96-36-MU)

Submitted: July 24, 1997

Decided: August 4, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Aaron E. Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark T.

Calloway, United States Attorney, David C. Keesler, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Ashley Foley pled guilty to one count of bank robbery under 18

U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1994). He seeks to appeal his 41-month sentence,

contending that the district court erred by refusing to depart downward. Foley filed a motion for a downward departure on the basis of

his allegedly diminished capacity, citing the United States Sentencing

Commission, Guidelines Manual § 5K2.13 (Nov. 1995). After hearing argument on the motion, the district court concluded that Foley

was not entitled to a downward departure and denied the motion.

A sentencing court's discretionary decision not to depart from the

guidelines range is not subject to appellate review. See United States

v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir. 1990). However, if the court

bases its decision not to depart on a perceived lack of legal authority,

its decision is a legal one, which is reviewed de novo. See United

States v. Hall, 977 F.2d 861, 863 (4th Cir. 1992). Here, the district

court stated its finding that Foley had committed bank robbery using

an apparently dangerous weapon. On that finding, the district court

concluded that Foley had committed a "crime of violence" and was

not, therefore, entitled to a departure. See United States v. Weddle, 30

F.3d 532, 537-40 (4th Cir. 1994). The court expressed no desire to

depart. We find that the court exercised its sound discretion in deciding not to depart. We therefore determine that the district court's decision is not subject to appellate review and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH FTR – Courtroom A501

Date: November 5, 2012 Cathy Coomes, Courtroom Deputy

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Iris Halpern

 Sean Ratliff

Plaintiff,

v.

WENDY J. CABRERA, Kent Eichstadt

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v.

THE ORIGINAL HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY Angelo Spinola

OF GEORGIA, INC., Benson Pope

Danielle Kitson

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING

Court in session: 11:07 a.m.

The Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Mr. Spinola appears by telephone.

The Court advises counsel that he is considering appointing a special master at Defendant’s

expense on the issues of social media, e-mails, and texts. Discussion held regarding appointment

of a special master. 

Argument and discussion regarding Defendant’s Motion to Compel under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37

[Doc. 177 (Doc. 172 sealed), filed 9/6/12]. 

Discussion held regarding re-opening Wendy Cabrera’s deposition. 

The Court takes the motion under advisement.

Court in recess: 1:04 p.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 1:57

Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 239 Filed 11/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 10, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00254-CV

BEAUTY BLESSING KPONI D/B/A KC BEAUTY SUPPLY, Appellant 

V.

GOLDEN YEN CORPORATION, Appellee 

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1106654 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed April 4, 2018. The appellate 

record was complete as of April 18, 2018. Appellant’s brief was due May 18, 2018. 

No brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed. 

On May 24, 2018, the court ordered appellant to file a brief by June 18, 2018. 

We cautioned that if appellant failed to comply with our order, we would dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

No brief or motion for extension of time to file the brief has been filed. 

Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2115

MFR COMPANY, L.C.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for 

Fremont 2003-1, Asset-Backed Certificate, Series 2003-1; 

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; SUSAN BRASSFIELD-HAUSENFLECK, 

a/k/a Susan Brassfield; MICHAEL HAUSENFLECK; TRUSTEE 

SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00407-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher J. Williams, VOGELMAN, TURNER, & WRIGHT, P.C., 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Maryia Y. Jones, John C. 

Lynch, Jason E. Manning, Andrew B. Pittman, TROUTMAN SANDERS, 

LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

The Appellant, MFR Company, L.C., appeals the district 

court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the 

complaint and denying MFR’s motion to remand the case to state 

court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. MFR 

Co., L.C. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust, No. 1:15-cv-00407-CMHIDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Pringle, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered December 4, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated October 2, 1989, this court remitted the case to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a de novo hearing on that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence and directed that the appeal be held in abeyance in the interim *(People v Pringle,*154 AD2d 410). The Supreme Court (Egitto, J.) has now reported that the defendant has failed to appear at the hearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as abandoned.

The Supreme Court has reported that the defendant has failed to appear at the hearing notwithstanding that it had been placed on the calendar on four occasions. Defense counsel was unable to locate the defendant and was unable to receive his instructions. Thus, the appeal has been abandoned. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Form 10-K fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    JACK W. OEHLKEJack W. Oehlke President and
Chief Executive Officer





Dated:    September 11, 2002






---




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    RONALD F. KLAWITTERRonald F. Klawitter Executive
Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





Dated:    September 11, 2002
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CHRI STOPHER IMESON , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2983 LT Case No. 2015

- DR

- 616 KELLY ENRIGHT ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed September 27, 2022 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt f or St. Jo hns County , Christopher S. F erebee , Ju dge. Christopher Imes on, P ont e Vedra Beach, pr o s e. Cindy L. Lask y, of The Lasky Law Firm, Jac k sonville, f

or Appellee.

PER CUR IAM. A FFIRMED.

E VANDER , WALLIS and EDWARDS , JJ., concur

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TAYLOR
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE 139 DAY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-12-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         100,334
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             106
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    419,818
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          79,856
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            80,581
<LOANS>                                      1,243,251
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,911,015
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,461,434
<SHORT-TERM>                                   169,139
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,021
<LONG-TERM>                                    126,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,250
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,911,015
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 40,924
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,061
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   458
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                52,443
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,516
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,738
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,705
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,388
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,109
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.26
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,969
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,323
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,607
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,709
<RECOVERIES>                                       423
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,709
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,709
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:    November      16, 2009 | /s/      Shi Huashan                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                | Shi      HuashanChief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of

Commerce for Intellectual Property and

Director of the United States Patent and

Trademark Office,

Intervenor

______________________

2020

- 1024

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018

- 00529

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 20-1024 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 12/21/2022H IGH 5 G AMES

, LLC V

. V IDAL 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 21, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 21, 2022 Case: 20-1024 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 12/21/2022