alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00421-WJM-02

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

2. JORGE LUIS QUIROZ, JR.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING “UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582"

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s “Unopposed Motion to

Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582.” (ECF No. 64). Having considered

the motion and the agreement of the parties represented therein, the Court finds: 1) the

sentence previously imposed has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by

the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u); 2) the

defendant is eligible for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and U.S.S.G. §1B1.10; 3)

the amended guideline range as reflected in the unopposed motion is correctly

calculated.

The Court’s determination of the Guideline Range prior to any departures is as

follows:

Previous Offense Level: 33

Criminal History Category: III

Previous Guideline Range: 168-210 months

Amended Offense Level: 31

Case 1:11-cr-00421-WJM Document 65 Filed 05/26/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Criminal History Category: III

Amended Guideline Range: 135-168 months 

It is further ordered that the motion is GRANTED. Taking into account the

factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and any guideline or statutory reductions, to the

extent applicable, the previously imposed sentence of 113 months imprisonment is

reduced to 90 months, EFFECTIVE November 1, 2015.

All other provisions of the Judgment entered on July 13, 2012, shall remain in

effect. 

Dated this 26th day of May, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez

United States District Judge 

2

Case 1:11-cr-00421-WJM Document 65 Filed 05/26/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Irvin SASSER v. STATE.

8 Div. 141.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 21, 1935.

BEICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00001-CR

Esther McCord, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. 617,100, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Following a hearing ordered by this Court, the trial court has found that Esther

McCord no longer desires to prosecute this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). The appeal is

dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Patterson

Dismissed

Filed: January 15, 2004

Do Not Publish
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000003508-JUN-201107:47 AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, October 17, 2008, 10 a.m. to October 17, 2008, 12 p.m. Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 8, 2008, FR Doc. E8-20642.                

Time change from 10 a.m.-12 p.m. to 8 a.m.-9:30 a.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 1, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E8-23781 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT GRAZIANO, DOC #Y28272, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4587

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed May 9, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 21, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.127 Finance Companies1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-PO-00149-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. MARK L. HALPER ,

Defendant.

 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECUSAL [DOC. #103] AND

DEFENDANT’S WITHDRAWAL OF ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED 

IN LETTER TO COURT DATED JUNE 10, 2013 [DOC. #125]

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

The Court has received Defendant’s Withdrawal of Allegations [Doc. #125] Contained in

Letter to Court [Doc. #103] Dated June 10, 2013, therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the telephone status conference scheduled for March 6,

2014 at 8:30 a.m. and the hearing on Motions set for March 6, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. are VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on Government’s Motion to Revoke Probation

[Doc. #121] is scheduled before the Magistrate Judge in Durango, Colorado on April 9, 2014 at 8:30

a.m.

DATED: March 4, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-po-00149-DW Document 128 Filed 03/04/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:11-po-00149-DW Document 128 Filed 03/04/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 95-60463

Summary Calendar

_______________________

JAYA SUNDARA UDAYA,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

_________________________________________________________________

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(A70-629-603)

_________________________________________________________________

April 17, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jaya Sundara Udaya petitions this court to review the

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his

applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. Jaya

Sundara Udaya contends that he established a well-founded fear of

persecution based on his political opinion and his membership in a

particular social group, consisting of people who have attempted to

foreswear membership in the terrorist JVP party. We have reviewed
-2-

the record, the BIA’s decision, the briefs and determine that the

evidence does not compel reversal of the BIA’s determination. Chun

v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). There is no evidence that

Udaya made his political opinions known to the JVP or that JVP

attempted to persecute him because of his opinion. Gomez-Mejia v.

INS, 56 F.3d 700, 701 (5th Cir. 1995). Further, there is no

evidence that those members who have left the JVP have been

persecuted because of the factors identified in the statute, as

opposed to their breaking the JVP’s rules.

Petition DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02603-REB-KMT FTR - Courtroom C-201

Date: August 30, 2012 Deputy Clerk, Nick Richards

DAVID C. ROSS,

Plaintiff,

Maria Theresa Antill

v.

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant.

Douglas J. Cox

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

MOTION HEARING

Court in session: 2:31 p.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Plaintiff David C. Ross is present with

counsel.

Motion Hearing is called regarding Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 35, filed

August 14, 2012].

Oral argument from plaintiff.

Oral argument from defendant.

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [35] is GRANTED IN PART AND

DENIED IN PART as stated on the record.

The motion is DENIED as to the subpoena duces tecum relating to

Ms. Lynn Armendariz. Ms. Armendariz does not possess the

documents and had no right or authority to bring the documents in

question to a deposition and therefore could not properly comply

with the subpoena. 

Further the motion is DENIED in all other respects except as

follows:

 Plaintiff shall provide the names of employees in his department

Case 1:11-cv-02603-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 08/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

who he in good faith believes are of the Muslim religion to defense

counsel on or before September 4, 2012. Defendant shall run a

check as to each of the persons named by Plaintiff as potentially of

the Muslim faith to see if any of the employees are hourly wage

employees. To the extent any employee listed above is an hourly

wage employee, Defense counsel shall provide spreadsheets titled

“Employee Time Distribution” from August 2010 to August 2012 as

discovery on or before September 13, 2012. To the extent any of

the employees listed above are salaried employees as opposed to

hourly wage employees, defense counsel is NOT required to

produce “Employee Time Distribution” reports because the

information would be irrelevant for the reasons stated on the

record. 

The parties are referred to Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District 196 F.R.D. 382 (D.

Colo. 2000) and shall draft a Protective Order should further discovery issues regarding

personal information arise in this matter.

Court in Recess: 3:25 p.m. 

Hearing concluded.

Total In-Court Time 00:54

*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Case 1:11-cv-02603-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 08/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 8051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 6175 Hwy 347, Beaumont, 
TX 77705, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum 
and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for 
customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 
and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct 
laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive 
written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e0e1f3adefe2e1ebf2c3e7ebf0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f6c6d7f21636e6d677e4f6b677c21686079">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
May 16, 2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
May 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E8-2437 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 13.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TeliaSonera AB (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kim Ignatius, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |        |  | /s/KIM IGNATIUS        
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Kim Ignatius           
| |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | Date:  |  | April 19, 2004         

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MAURICE SMITH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 64 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.111 Foreign Banking Offices in U.S.1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-2640-RBJ-BNB

ARDIS L. KERNS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BANNER HEALTH, doing business as North Colorado Medical Center

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on March 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 

A Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference is set for February 26, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

Counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to 

address: jury instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, 

stipulations as to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

Case 1:11-cv-02640-RBJ Document 13 Filed 02/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 23rd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02640-RBJ Document 13 Filed 02/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02618-RPM

MARCELLA A. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

_____________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on November 22, 2011, at 10:30 a.m.

in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout

Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of

Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx

(Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions

(Rev. 1/08). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers

by 4:00 p.m. on November 17, 2011.

 The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or

representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.

DATED: October 14th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02618-RPM Document 4 Filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Criminal Case No. 11-CR-0386-RBJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

1. ALEJANDRO DE LA CRUZ-FLORES,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL, DATES AND DEADLINES

This matter has been scheduled for a four-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the Alfred A. Arraj U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A702, 7th Floor, 

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on December 12, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. It is 

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by October 26, 2011 and responses to 

these motions shall be filed by November 9, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall be made 

no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such 

experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made one week 

after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such experts shall be made no 

later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is further 

Case 1:11-cr-00386-RBJ Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that counsel shall jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-

4694 or by email at Jackson_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov within five days after filing of pretrial motions to set the case for Motions Hearing. It is further

ORDERED that counsel shall contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 as 

soon as possible to set a Change of Plea Hearing. It is further 

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference will be scheduled one week prior to trial. 

(Date to be determined). 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial Preparation 

Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED this 11th day of October , 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00386-RBJ Document 7 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### BOLLERMAN v. C & H NASH SALES & SERVICE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1659

 To limit the simultaneous deployment to combat zones of dual-military 
                   couples who have minor dependents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2007

   Mr. Gregg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the simultaneous deployment to combat zones of dual-military 
                   couples who have minor dependents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON SIMULTANEOUS DEPLOYMENT TO COMBAT ZONES OF 
              DUAL-MILITARY COUPLES WHO HAVE MINOR DEPENDENTS.

    In the case of a member of the Armed Forces with minor dependents 
who has a spouse who is also a member of the Armed Forces, and the 
spouse is deployed in an area for which imminent danger pay is 
authorized under section 310 of title 37, United States Code, the 
member may request a deferment of a deployment to such an area until 
the spouse returns from such deployment.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Arnold P. Kling,  President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2007

/s/ Arnold P. Kling
-----------------------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.117 Life Insurance Companies** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|