alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02712–REB–KMT

LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SHERIFF TED MINKS, 

MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager,

JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010,

LT. MARTINALLI,

LT. G. GITTIN,

LT. J. LUCAS,

ADMINISTRATIVE SGT. RENFRO,

SGT. TROY BETKA,

SGT. SCOTT HAPP,

SGT. STEVEN WYGANT,

OFFICER KATHRINE FEROE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF CRUMBAKER,

DEPUTY SHERIFF RYAN VIERS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DUSTIN DYELING,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ANTHONY KOTRIS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DONALD SPRINGFIELD,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HOLLEY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES GELEUDE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JASON RICHARDSON,

DEPUTY SHERIFF REID PERRY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF WILLIAM BOHM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ERIK BOUGHAM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HERBERT LONGSHORE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF #1958 (Name Unknown),

COUNSELOR MIKE COLLINS,

COUNSELOR SUPERVISOR DEBRA ELUDO,

CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT,

CLAUDIA VAN BUREN/HSA,

RAYMOND HERR, Responsible Physician,

TRACY HAINES, LPN, and

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 35 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

KATHERINE BECERRA, RN,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

This matter is before the court on Document Number 33, filed by Plaintiff on April 9, 2012,

which the court construes to be a Motion for Transcripts and for Copies of Certain Court Filings. 

Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 

To the extent that Plaintiff seeks state court hearings transcripts, Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 33)

is DENIED. Plaintiff effectively seeks discovery to obtain transcripts of certain state court

hearings because they “would corroborate with [Plaintiff’s] 2nd Amended Complaint as intrinsic

evidence.” (Mot. at 2.) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv), pro se actions brought by

individuals in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision are a category of

proceedings “exempt from initial disclosure.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv). Additionally, the

local rules of this court provide that a scheduling order and orders for discovery are unnecessary

in categories of proceedings listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2.B.2. 

The court declines to allow discovery prior to the entry of a scheduling order or discovery order. 

Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks copies of his initial Prisoner

Complaint (Doc. No. 1, filed Oct. 18, 2011) and his Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. No. 9,

filed Dec. 12, 2011). The clerk of court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of his initial Prisoner

Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and his Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiff is advised

that the court will not provide him with additional copies of court filings in the future. 

Dated: April 9, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 35 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02649-BNB

LAURA K. McCOMBS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

JON MARTINEZ,

18th JUDICIAL DISTRICT, and

INTERSTATE TRANSFER DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Laura McCombs, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint. 

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland reviewed the Complaint; determined Ms. McCombs’

claims more properly were raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action; and entered an order on

October 20, 2011, instructing her to file her claims on a Court-approved form used in

filing § 2241 actions.

At the time Ms. McCombs filed the instant action she was on probation in the

Denver area and was homeless. The Clerk of the Court was unable to send copies of

the § 2241 forms to Ms. McCombs because she did not have an address where she

could receive mail.

In the October 20 Order, Magistrate Judge Boland instructed Ms. McCombs that

she must communicate with the Court to determine the status of her case and ascertain

what she must do to prosecute her claims. Ms. McCombs has failed to communicate

with the Court, and as a result she has failed to file her claims on a proper CourtCase 1:11-cv-02649-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

approved form. Therefore, the action will be dismissed for failure to comply with

Magistrate Judge Boland’s Order of October 20, 2011. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 41(b) for failure to comply with the October 20, 2011 Order.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 30th day of November , 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:11-cv-02649-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                            FLEET BOSTON CORPORATION
              Schedule of Executive Officers Who Have Entered into
                            Certain Letter Agreements

         Terrence Murray
         Eugene M. McQuade
         H. Jay Sarles
         Anne M. Finucane
         Brian T. Moynihan
         William C. Mutterperl
         M. Anne Szostak


<PAGE>




[Fleet Letterhead]

August 24 1999

[                     ]






Dear [          ]:

On behalf of the Human Resources and Planning Committee, I am pleased to tell
you that, in consideration of future service as an Executive Officer of Fleet
Boston, and in recognition of your past years of dedicated service, Fleet Boston
will provide you with an enhanced severance benefit equal to continuation of
your base salary for two years (the "Severance Period") if your employment is
terminated by Fleet without Cause, or by you for Good Reason (a "Covered
Termination").

During the Severance Period, you will continue to be deemed an active employee
for purposes of all qualified and/or non-qualified retirement and savings plans
offered to similarly-situated executives, health and welfare programs,
equity-based incentive plans and your existing change in control agreement
(provided that, in the event of a change in control of Fleet Boston, any
benefits to which you are entitled under that agreement are not duplicative with
benefits provided by this letter).

[In addition, if your employment should cease due to a Covered Termination prior
to your having reached age fifty-five, you will be deemed to be vested in the
deferred compensation plan, allowing your account balance to be distributed
according to your valid distribution election form (as opposed to an immediate
lump sum payment upon termination). Further, while your funds remain in the
account, they will earn the highest crediting rate as in effect for active
employees.]

"Good Reason" is defined as: 1) the assignment of any duties and
responsibilities inconsistent in any material respect with those customarily
associated with your position (including status, office, title and reporting
relationship), or any other action that results in a diminution of duties or
other material adverse change in your position; 2) any failure by Fleet Boston
to provide base salary, annual bonus, incentive, savings and retirement


<PAGE>

plans, and welfare benefit plans as are provided generally to similarly-situated
executives; or 3) any requirement by the Company that your principal work
location be other than Boston, Massachusetts or Providence, Rhode Island.

"Cause" is defined as fraud, intentional wrong-doing, malfeasance that is
harmful to Fleet Boston or a material violation of Fleet Boston's Code of
Ethics.

Please keep a copy of this letter for your records. If you have any questions,
please call me.

Sincerely,

[                             ]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02677-RPM

FRED KAFER,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. 

 

ORDER TO COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4

 

It appearing from the files and records that defendant has not filed a disclosure

statement, it is

ORDERED, that counsel for the defendant shall file a disclosure statement pursuant to 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.4. 

Dated: December 13th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02677-RPM Document 7 Filed 12/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 47 Filed 04/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
SPRINGS\814955.1 

DISTRICT COURT, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO 

Address: 270 South Tejon Street 

 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 

 (719) 448-7700 

5COURT USE ONLY5

Plaintiff: LORRIE E. CONWAY (FKA LORRIE KING) 

v. 

Defendant: RAMBLIN EXPRESS, INC., a Colorado 

Corporation. 

Case Number: 11 CV 4878 

 

Div.: 18 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ramblin Express, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) 

Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time Within Which to File an Answer or Other Responsive 

Pleading. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 

1. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time Within Which To File an 

Answer or Other Responsive Pleading is GRANTED; and 

2. Defendants shall have an additional seven (7) days, up to and including 

October 11, 2010, within which to file an Answer or other responsive pleading. 

DATED this day of October, 2011. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 __________________________________________ 

 District Court Judge 

 

GRANTED The moving party is hereby ORDERED 

to provide a copy of this Order to 

any pro se parties who have entered an 

appearance in this action within 10 days 

from the date of this order. Deborah J. Grohs 

District Court Judge 

DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT 

Case 1:11-cv-02646-WYD-MEH Document 4 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
/s/ Judge Deborah J Grohs 

Court: CO El Paso County District Court 4th JD 

Judge: Deborah J Grohs 

File & Serve 

Transaction ID: 40161800 

Current Date: Oct 07, 2011 

Case Number: 2011CV4878 

Case Name: CONWAY, LORRIE E vs. RAMBLIN EXPRESS INC A COLORADO CORPORATI 

Court Authorizer: Deborah J Grohs 

Case 1:11-cv-02646-WYD-MEH Document 4 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### William J. STUDER v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 1654.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1938.

A. E. Williams, of Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.

Whit Y. Mauzy, U. S. A-tty., of Tulsa, Okl.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed, at appellant’s costs, for failure to prosecute, on motion of appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8.3

                The Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement


This Third Amendment dated  October 16, 1997  is made between Madison River
Telephone Company, LLC  ("Holdings") and Paul H. Sunu, ("Executive") pursuant to
paragraph 11 of the Employment Agreement between Holdings and Executive dated
April 17, 1996 ("Employment Agreement").



1.   Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by inserting the
     following after the first full sentence:


          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, the closing of MebCom Communications,
          Inc. shall not be considered the first acquisition and its closing
          date shall not be considered the First Acquisition Closing Date for
          purposes of paragraph 2 (Term of Employment), this paragraph 3
          (Compensation) and paragraph 6 (Termination of Employment)."


2.   Section 8, third sentence shall be amended by replacing the place of
     arbitration submission from "Chicago, Illinois" to "Raleigh-Durham
     metropolitan area of North Carolina" and by replacing the language "in
     accordance with Illinois law" with "in accordance with Delaware law".


All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and
effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and Holdings have caused this Second Amendment to
the Employment Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above.


                         Madison River Telephone Company, LLC


                         by:  J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
                            --------------------------


                              PAUL H. SUNU
                         -----------------------------
                         Executive
#### In the Matter of Edward F. Ryan et al., Petitioners, and DeWitt-Aero Manufacturing Corp., Intervenor-Petitioner, v Russell Miller et al., Constituting the Town of Geddes Zoning Board of Appeals, Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Because petitioners failed to establish unnecessary hardship, the Zoning Board’s determination denying the request for a use variance was proper. Petitioners’ expert opined that the owners would realize a 5.7% return on the sale of the property for a permitted use, whereas they could realize a 10% to 11% return on other conservative investments. However, the owners of the property must establish that they could not realize a reasonable return, and the fact that they cannot put the property to its most profitable use is immaterial *(see, Williams v Town of Oyster Bay,*32 NY2d 78, 81-82). Moreover, petitioners failed to demonstrate that the property could not be sold for a permitted use because no evidence was presented concerning what efforts were made to sell the property *(see, Matter of Forrest v Evershed,*7 NY2d 256, 262). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 23 (PLANTE AND MORAN LETTERHEAD) CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.
375 North Willowbrook Road
Coldwater, MI 49036 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333105546 and Form S-8 No. 333105548) of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc., of our report dated
March 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Monarch Community Bancorp,
Inc. included in this Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004. (PLANTE AND MORAN SIGNATURE) Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 7, 2005
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11466]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska (FEMA-1796-DR), dated 09/26/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         07/27/2008 through 08/06/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         09/26/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/25/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/26/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/26/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Denali Borough, Fairbanks North Star Borough, North Slope Borough, Yukon-Koyukuk REAA. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and economic injury is 11466. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-24083 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1489 

To provide for an additional place of holding court in the western district 

of Washington. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for an additional place of holding court in the 

western district of Washington. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT. 

4 Section 128(b) of title 28, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘and Tacoma’’ and inserting ‘‘Ta6 coma, and Vancouver’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Urban von Euler,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Urban von Euler
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Urban von Euler
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  May 17, 2004
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Arguelles M.D., P.C. as Assignee of MANUSHKA LAIBHEN, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Omni Indemnity Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered June 12, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Arguelles M.D., P.C. as Assignee of Marie Francoeur v Omni Indem. Co.</i> (— Misc 3d —, 2016 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2013-1541 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: March 30, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated September 29, 1997, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of SI
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31,
1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statement of SI Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 2-92865,
effective August 6, 1984).



   /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
--------------------------------------------
Grant Thornton LLP


Seattle, Washington
October 28, 1997

                                       38
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Golden Cycle Gold Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-47877 and 333-12245) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 33-62952 and 333-26975) on Form
S-8 of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation of our report dated March 21, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows, for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Golden Cycle Gold
Corporation.


/s/  KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
April 11, 2003
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10105 Conference Calendar

__________________ RONNIE TIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus COUNTY OF DALLAS, AND JIM BOWLES, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CV-1822-H
- - - - - - - - - - (March 23, 1995) Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * A district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint if it is frivolous, that is, if it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. Denton v. Hernandez , 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1733-34 (1992). A 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Id . at 1734. Although this court liberally construes the writings of pro se appellants, arguments must be briefed to be preserved. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (citationsNo. 95-10105 -2- omitted). Timmons does not in any way brief any issue on this appeal. Timmons' appeal does not demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous. The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Fifth Cir. R. 42.2.