alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02443-BNB
(The above civil action number must appear on all future papers
sent to the court in this action. Failure to include this number

may result in a delay in the consideration of your claims.) FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DENVER, COLORADO

SEP 22 2011

GREGORY C. LANGHAM
Vv. CLERK

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG,

Applicant,

WARDEN DAVIS,

Respondent.

ORDER CONSTRUING 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ACTION AS A
PRISONER COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING
APPLICANT TO FILE A PRISONER COMPLAINT

Applicant, Timothy Doyle Young, is in the custody of the United States Bureau of
Prisons (BOP) and currently is incarcerated at the ADX in Florence, Colorado. Mr.
Young, acting pro se, filed a document titled “Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum.”

The Court has reviewed the document filed in this action and finds that Mr.
Young is asserting civil rights claims rather than habeas corpus claims. Mr. Young
complains that the BOP is denying him access to the mail and falsifying records. He,
therefore, is not challenging the execution of his sentence but the conditions of his
confinement.

“The essence of habeas corpus is an attack by a person in custody upon the
legality of that custody, and . . . the traditional function of the writ is to secure release

from illegal custody.” See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973). Generally, a


federal prisoner’s challenge to his conditions of confinement is cognizable under Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See,
e.g., Richards v. Bellmon, 941 F.2d 1015, 1018 (10" Cir. 1991). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Young cure the deficiencies designated above by filing a
Prisoner Complaint and either by paying the $350.00 filing fee or by filing a Prisoner's
Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 within thirty
days from the date of this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Young shall obtain the court-approved Prisoner
Complaint form and the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (with the assistance of his case manager or the facility’s legal assistant),
along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if within the time allowed Mr. Young fails to cure the
designated deficiencies the action will be dismissed without prejudice and without
further notice.

DATED September 22, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02443-BNB
Timothy Doyle Young
Reg. No. 60012-001
ADX Florence
PO Box 8500
Florence, CO 81226

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 22, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By: By

Deputy Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24071]



[[Page 60304]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1795-DR]


Indiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1792-DR), dated September 23, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 23, 2008.

    Clark, Crawford, Dearborn, Jackson, Knox, Lawrence, Martin, 
Pike, Spencer, and Switzerland Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-24071 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02352-CMA-BNB

GERARDO LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

AURORA POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL PRINCE, in his individual and official capacity, and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AGENT ELIZABETH BOGESSE, in her

individual capacity,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff Gerardo Lopez’s Unopposed Motion

for Leave to Amend Complaint, and for Acceptance of Contemporaneously-Filed Amended

Complaint [docket no. 23, filed December 19, 2011] (the “Motion”).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is directed to

accept for filing the attached Amended Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand.

DATED: December 20, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02352-CMA-BNB Document 28 Filed 12/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### The State, ex rel. Mulhern, *v.*Foster et al.

(No. 24159

Decided February 20, 1935.)

*Mr. Arthur P. Gustafson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Alvord, Blakely & Ostrander, Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Mr. W. Lowrie Fleming*and *Mr. John*A• *Duncan,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the *238reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: September 11, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Probation Officer: Katrina Devine (a.m.)

Michelle Means (p.m.)

Interpreter: Susanna Cahill

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

ABEL SANCHEZ-LEON, David Owen

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

10:11 a.m. Court in session.

Continued from July 30, 2013

Defendant present in custody.

Interpreter sworn.

The Government orally moves to dismiss the Counts in the original Indictment as to this

defendant. Defendant has no objection.

ORDER: The Government’s oral motion to dismiss the Counts in the original Indictment as

to this defendant is GRANTED.

Change of Plea Hearing on May 6, 2013. Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1-6; 13-14 of the

Superseding Indictment .

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The parties do not request departure.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 637 Filed 09/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Sentencing Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a). Further argument.

Allocution. - Statements made by: The Government, the defendant, defense counsel.

ORDER: The Sentencing hearing will be continued until 2:00 p.m. today for the reasons

stated on the record. 

11:46 a.m. Court in recess.

2:07 p.m. Court in session.

Oral findings are made of record. 

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. Further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Non-Guideline Sentence (Doc. #625) is DENIED.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

2:54 p.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 2 hours 20 minutes

Hearing concluded.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 637 Filed 09/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE



The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Key Tronic Corporation

Spokane, Washington



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-70917 and
333-61202 on Form S-8 of our report dated August 16, 2002 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Key Tronic Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended July 3, 2004.



We have audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended June
29, 2002 and have issued our report thereon dated August 16, 2002 such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audit also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company, listed in Item 15(a). This financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management.



Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements takes as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects the information set forth therein.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Seattle, Washington      
|September 17, 2004
#### BRUCE v. PHILLIPS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                           5,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,292)
<INVENTORY>                                     50,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,237
<PP&E>                                         111,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                (64,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           116
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,645
<SALES>                                         63,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,389
<CGS>                                           44,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS RESTATED TO REFLECT
THE RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE COMPANY'S CHANGE IN METHOD OF VALUING U.S.
INVENTORIES FROM LIFO TO FIFO.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          20,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  239,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,233)
<INVENTORY>                                    209,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               484,784
<PP&E>                                         210,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                (94,956)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 861,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,888
<BONDS>                                        774,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           970
<OTHER-SE>                                   (214,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   861,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               486,391
<CGS>                                          326,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,522)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,953)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10111 Conference Calendar

VINCENT LOUIS HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CV-1326-R

-------------------- June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Vincent Haynes appeals the dismissal of his complaint, filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., alleging claims of false arrest and false imprisonment stemming from his arrest and conviction for cocaine possession with the intent to distribute. Haynes argues that the district court erred in dismissing the complaint because the court did not apply state law to his claims and it did not instruct him, a pro

se litigant, to amend his complaint. He further argues that theNo. 01-10111 -2- district court did not rule on his motion for preliminary injunction. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a plaintiff’s case on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Eason v. Holt , 73 F.3d 600, 601 (5th Cir. 1996). Dismissal of the complaint was appropriate. Because resolution of this action would necessarily affect the validity of Haynes' conviction and sentence, Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477 (1994) mandates dismissal since no cause of action accrues unless and until Haynes can show that his conviction has been declared invalid. Haynes’ argument that the district court erred in not instructing him to amend his complaint is raised for the first time on appeal, and, therefore, we do not consider it. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1138 (2000). Haynes’ arguments concerning the application of respondeat superior to his claims are likewise not entertained, having also been raised for the first time on appeal. Haynes’ motion for preliminary injunction was made moot by the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. See Louisiana World Exposition, Inc., v. Logue , 746 F.2d 1033, 1038 (5th Cir. 1984). The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case 1:11-cv-02214-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02437-RPM

ANDREA L. CHISHOLM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCK GARDENS RAFTING, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

GLENWOOD CANYON ZIP LINE ADVENTURES, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

ROCK GARDENS MOBILE HOME PARK & CAMPGROUND, LLC d/b/a GLENWOOD

CANYON RESORT, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL, an Individual,

JEFFREY HALE, an Individual, and

BRIAN VANDERMARK, an Individual.

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER VACATING ORDER OF REFERENCE

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon reassignment of this civil action and this Court’s case management

procedures, it is

ORDERED that the order of reference to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya is

vacated. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the December 13, 2012, pretrial conference and the

deadline for submitting a proposed pretrial order are vacated

DATED: June 28th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02437-RPM Document 43 Filed 06/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00422-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HA MANH DO,

Defendant.

 

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

This criminal action has proceeded to sentencing and a final judgment and

conviction, and the defendant was remanded to the custody of the United States

Marshal at sentencing, or has self-surrendered to the designated facility, as confirmed

by the United States Bureau of Prisons. As a result, all the conditions of an appearance

bond imposed by the court as a pretrial matter to secure the defendant’s release,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), have been satisfied. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the bond in this case is hereby exonerated and the surety or

sureties, if applicable, are released. It is further 

ORDERED that the bail funds or property deposited into the registry of the court

shall hereby be released by the clerk of the court, or a designated deputy, to the surety

or the defendant. 

Dated April 3, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 58863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23949]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 7, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 58863]]

                Proclamation 8301 of October 3, 2008

                
German-American Day, 2008

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                For generations, German Americans have contributed to 
                our Nation's identity, culture, and prosperity. On 
                German-American Day, we recognize the many Americans 
                with German ancestry who helped make our country great, 
                and we celebrate our strong friendship with Germany.

                The people of Germany and the United States share 
                important family and cultural ties, and millions of 
                American citizens are of German descent. Some of their 
                forebears were among the first to settle Jamestown, and 
                they and many others like them helped lay the 
                foundation for our country, which has become the most 
                prominent symbol of freedom in the world. Many German 
                Americans have shaped our way of life and added to our 
                country's rich heritage.

                In celebrating German-American Day, we honor 
                generations of German Americans who came to our shores 
                with dreams of opportunity and contributed to the 
                greatness of our country.

                NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the 
                United States of America, by virtue of the authority 
                vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 
                States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2008, as German-
                American Day. I encourage all Americans to celebrate 
                the many contributions German Americans have made to 
                our Nation's liberty and prosperity.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                third day of October, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. E8-23949
Filed 10-6-08; 11:30 am]
Billing code 3195-W9-P
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KEVIN D. HANNER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-936 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 7, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.