November 29, 2012, at 9:30 a.m.

in Courtroom A-502, 

Fifth Floor, 

Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 

901 19th Street,

Denver, Colorado 80294

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW

BRIAN M. GROSS,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

STEVE M. VICALVI,

Defendant(s).

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE

MICHAEL J. WATANABE

United States Magistrate Judge

The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J.

Watanabe pursuant to the Order Referring Case, entered by Judge Marcia S. Krieger

on February 17, 2012 (Docket No. 24).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) shall be held on:

If this date is not convenient for any counsel/pro se party, he/she should confer

with opposing counsel/pro se party and file a motion to reschedule the conference to a

more convenient date.

Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any

appearance in this court will be entertained unless a written request is made FIVE

(5) business days in advance of the date of appearance.

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12
THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE NOT ENTERED

AN APPEARANCE, OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULING/PLANNING

CONFERENCE.

IT IS ORDERED that counsel/pro se parties in this case shall hold a prescheduling conference meeting and prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in

accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.26(f) as amended, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 26.1 and App.

F, on or before 21 days prior to scheduling conference. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.26(d),

as amended, no discovery shall be sought until after the pre-scheduling conference

meeting. No later than 5 days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel/pro

se parties shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order (in PDF) in compliance with

the ECF Filing Procedures. In addition, on or before 14 days after the pre-scheduling

conference meeting, the parties shall comply with the mandatory disclosure

requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P.26(a)(1), as amended.

Counsel/pro se parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in

accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms

section of the Court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov, and are also attached to this

document. Instructions for downloading the formats are posted in the forms section of

the website. Parties who are pro se or do not have access to the internet may visit the

Clerk’s Office in Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Room A-105,

Denver, Colorado. (The Clerk’s Office telephone number is (303) 844-3433.) 

Scheduling Orders prepared by parties not represented by counsel, or without access to

ECF, shall be submitted on paper.

All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3 prior to the

Scheduling/Planning Conference.

It is the responsibility of counsel to notice the court of their entry of appearance,

notice of withdrawal, notice of substitution of counsel, or notice of change of counsel’s

address, e-mail address, or telephone number by complying with the ECF Procedures

and, filing the appropriate document with the court.

Please remember that everyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United

States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See

D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in denial of

entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse.

DONE AND SIGNED THIS 10th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael J. Watanabe

_____________________________

MICHAEL J. WATANABE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 12
Appendix F

(Rev. 12/01/11)

 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION 

OF SCHEDULING ORDER 

When the court has set a scheduling conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 and 16.2 , a scheduling order shall be prepared in accordance with

these instructions. The rule 26(f) meeting shall be held at least 21 days before the proposed

scheduling order is due to be tendered. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

shall be exchanged at or within 14 days after the rule 26(f) meeting. Do not file any disclosure

statements with the court. 

Seven days before the scheduling conference (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 for all

computations of time), counsel are to tender a proposed scheduling order which shall

include the signatures of counsel and pro se parties and shall provide for approval by

the court as specified on the attached form. Counsel and pro se parties should try, in

good faith, to agree upon matters covered in the scheduling order. Any area of

disagreement should be set forth with a brief statement concerning the basis for the

disagreement. The parties should expect that the court will make modifications in the

proposed scheduling order and will want to discuss all issues affecting management of

the case. 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2 authorizes magistrate judges to exercise jurisdiction of

civil matters upon the consent of the parties. If all parties have consented to the

exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, the

“Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction and

Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge” form and a

proposed order of reference are to be filed promptly with the Clerk of the Court and the

consent indicated in section 6. of the proposed scheduling order. Note that

D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2D. provides, in part: "Written consent to proceed before a

magistrate judge must be filed no later than 14 days after the discovery cut-off date. In

cases not requiring discovery, the parties shall have 40 days from the filing of the last

responsive pleading to file their unanimous consent." Refer to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2F.

if all parties have not been served or in the event additional parties are added after the

scheduling conference. 

Listed on the following pages as Appendix F.1. is the format for the proposed

scheduling order. The bracketed and italicized information on the form explains what

the court expects.

Also listed on the following pages as Appendix F.2. is the format for the

proposed scheduling order in an ERISA action. The bracketed and italicized information

on the form explains what the court expects.

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 12
Also listed on the following pages as Appendix F.3. is the format for the

proposed joint case management plan for social security cases. The bracketed and

italicized information on the form explains what the court expects.

Also listed on the following pages as Appendix F.4. is the format for the

proposed joint case management plan for petitions for review of agency action in

environmental cases. The bracketed and italicized information on the form explains

what the court expects.

Scheduling orders shall be double-spaced in accordance with

D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1E., even though the instructions in the following format for

the proposed scheduling order are single-spaced.

PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE DIRECTED TO THE COURT’S WEBSITE,

http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Dindex.htm, FOR ITS LOCAL RULES AND THE

GENERAL PROCEDURES OF EACH JUDICIAL OFFICER.

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 12
5

Appendix F.1.

(Rev. 03/12)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No.

*

Plaintiff(s),

v.

*

Defendant(s).

SCHEDULING ORDER

1. DATE OF CONFERENCE

AND APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

[Provide the date of the conference and the names, addresses, and

telephone numbers of counsel for each party and each pro se party. Identify by name

the party represented by each counsel.]

2. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

[Provide a concise statement of the basis for subject matter jurisdiction

with appropriate statutory citations. If jurisdiction is denied, give the specific reason for

the denial.]

3. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS AND DEFENSES

a. Plaintiff(s):

b. Defendant(s):

c. Other Parties:

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 12
6

[Provide concise statements of all claims or defenses. Each party, in light

of formal or informal discovery undertaken thus far, should take special care to eliminate

frivolous claims or defenses. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and 16(c)(2)(A). Do not summarize the

pleadings. Statements such as defendant denies the material allegations of the

complaint" are not acceptable.]

4. UNDISPUTED FACTS

The following facts are undisputed:

[When the parties have the Rule 26(f) meeting, they should make a

good-faith attempt to determine which facts are not in dispute.]

5. COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES

[Include a computation of all categories of damages sought and the basis

and theory for calculating damages. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(iii). This should

include the claims of all parties. It should also include a description of the economic

damages, non-economic damages, and physical impairment claimed, if any.]

6. REPORT OF PRECONFERENCE DISCOVERY AND

MEETING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 26(f)

a. Date of Rule 26(f) meeting.

b. Names of each participant and party he/she represented.

c. Statement as to when Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures were made or will be

made.

[If a party’s disclosures were not made within the time provided in Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(1)(C) or by the date set by court order, the parties must provide an explanation

showing good cause for the omission.]

d. Proposed changes, if any, in timing or requirement of disclosures under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).

e. Statement concerning any agreements to conduct informal discovery:

[State what processes the parties have agreed upon to conduct informal

discovery, such as joint interviews with potential witnesses or joint meetings with clients

to discuss settlement, or exchanging documents outside of formal discovery. If there is

agreement to conduct joint interviews with potential witnesses, list the names of such

witnesses and a date and time for the interview which has been agreed to by the

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 12
7

witness, all counsel, and all pro se parties.]

f. Statement concerning any other agreements or procedures to reduce

discovery and other litigation costs, including the use of a unified exhibit

numbering system.

[Counsel and pro se parties are strongly encouraged to cooperate in order to

reduce the costs of litigation and expedite the just disposition of the case. Discovery and

other litigation costs may be reduced, for example, through telephone depositions, joint

repositories for documents, use of discovery in other cases, and extensive use of expert

affidavits to support judicial notice. Counsel and pro se parties also will be expected to

use a unified exhibit numbering system if required by the practice standards of the

judicial officer presiding over the trial of this case.]

g. Statement as to whether the parties anticipate that their claims or

defenses will involve extensive electronically stored information, or that a

substantial amount of disclosure or discovery will involve information or

records maintained in electronic form.

[In such cases, the parties must indicate what steps they have taken or will take

to (I) preserve electronically stored information; (ii) facilitate discovery of electronically

stored information; (iii) limit the associated discovery costs and delay; (iv) avoid

discovery disputes relating to electronic discovery; and (v) address claims of privilege or

of protection as trial-preparation materials after production of computer-generated

records. Counsel should describe any proposals or agreements regarding electronic

discovery made at the Rule 26(f) conference and be prepared to discuss issues

involving electronic discovery, as appropriate, at the Scheduling Conference.]

[When the parties have their Rule 26(f) meeting, they must discuss any issues

relating to the disclosure and discovery of electronically stored information, including the

form of production, and also discuss issues relating to the preservation of electronically

stored information, communications, and other data. At the Rule 26(f) meeting, the

parties should make a good faith effort to agree on a mutually acceptable format for

production of electronic or computer-based information. In advance of the Rule 26(f)

meeting, counsel carefully investigate their client’s information management systems so

that they are knowledgeable as to its operation, including how information is stored and

how it can be retrieved.]

h. Statement summarizing the parties’ discussions regarding the possibilities

for promptly settling or resolving the case.

[The parties are required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(2) to have discussed the

possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case by alternate dispute

resolution. They must also report the result of any such meeting, and any similar future

meeting, to the magistrate judge within 14 days of the meeting.]

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 12
8

7. CONSENT

[Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2, all full-time magistrate judges in the District

of Colorado are specially designated under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) to conduct any or all

proceedings in any jury or nonjury civil matter and to order the entry of judgment. 

Parties consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge must complete

and file the court-approved Consent to the Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States

Magistrate Judge form.] 

[Indicate below the parties’ consent choice. Upon consent of the parties and an

order of reference from the district judge, the magistrate judge assigned the case under

28 U.S.C.§ 636(a) and (b) will conduct all proceedings related to the case.]

All parties [have or have not] consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a

magistrate judge.

8. DISCOVERY LIMITATIONS

[In the majority of cases, the parties should anticipate that the court will adopt the

presumptive limitations on depositions established in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2)(A)(I) and

33(a)(I). The parties are expected to engage in pretrial discovery in a responsible

manner consistent with the spirit and purposes of Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 and 26 through 37. 

The parties are expected to propose discovery limits that are proportional to the needs

of the case, the amount in controversy, and the importance of the issues at stake in the

action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(g)(1)(B)(iii). The court must limit discovery otherwise

permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if it determines that “the burden or

expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, considering the needs of

the case, the amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the importance of the

issues at stake in the action, and the importance of the discovery in resolving the

action.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C).]

a. Modifications which any party proposes to the presumptive numbers of

depositions or interrogatories contained in the Federal Rules. 

[If a party proposes to exceed the numerical limits set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P.

30(a)(2)(A)(I), at the scheduling conference they should be prepared to support that

request by reference to the factors identified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C)]

b. Limitations which any party proposes on the length of depositions.

c. Limitations which any party proposes on the number of requests for

production and/or requests for admission.

[If the parties propose more than twenty-five (25) requests for production and/or

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 12
9

requests for admission, at the scheduling conference they should be prepared to

support that proposal by reference to the factors identified in Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(b)(2)(C).]

d. Other Planning or Discovery Orders

[Set forth any other proposed orders concerning scheduling or discovery. For

example, the parties may wish to establish specific deadlines for submitting protective

orders or for filing motions to compel.]

9. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE

a. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings:

[Set time period within which to join other parties and to amend all pleadings. 

This deadline refers to timing only and does not eliminate the necessity to file an

appropriate motion and to otherwise comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. Unless otherwise

ordered in a particular case, for good cause, this deadline should be no later than 45

days after the date of the scheduling conference, so as to minimize the possibility that

late amendments and joinder of parties will precipitate requests for extensions of

discovery cutoff, final pretrial conference, and dispositive motion dates. Counsel and pro

se parties should plan discovery so that discovery designed to identify additional parties

or claims is completed before these deadlines.]

b. Discovery Cut-off:

c. Dispositive Motion Deadline:

[Set time periods in which discovery is to be completed and dispositive motions

are to be filed.]

d. Expert Witness Disclosure

1. The parties shall identify anticipated fields of expert testimony, if

any.

2. Limitations which the parties propose on the use or number of

expert witnesses.

3. The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing

counsel and any pro se parties with all information specified in Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before , 201__.

[This includes disclosure of information applicable to “Witnesses

Who Must Provide A Written Report” under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) and

information applicable to “Witnesses Who Do Not Provide a Written

Report” under Rule 26(a)(2)(C).]

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 12
10

4. The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide

opposing counsel and any pro se party with all information specified

in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before 

 , 201___. [This includes disclosure of information applicable to

“Witnesses Who Must Provide A Written Report” under Rule

26(a)(2)(B) and information applicable to “Witnesses Who Do Not

Provide a Written Report” under Rule 26(a)(2)(C).]

[Notwithstanding the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), no exception to the

requirements of the Rule will be allowed by stipulation unless the stipulation is in writing

and approved by the court. In addition to the requirements set forth in Rule

26(a)(2)(B)(I)-(vi), the expert’s written report also must identify the principles and

methods on which the expert relied in support of his/her opinions and describe how the

expert applied those principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to

the opinions set forth in the written report.]

e. Identification of Persons to Be Deposed:

[List the names of persons to be deposed and provide a good faith estimate of

the time needed for each deposition. All depositions must be completed on or before the

discovery cut-off date and the parties must comply with the notice and scheduling

requirements set for in D.C.COLOLCivR 30.1.]

f. Deadline for Interrogatories:

[The parties are expected to serve interrogatories on opposing counsel or a pro

se party on a schedule that allows timely responses on or before the discovery cut-off

date.]

g. Deadline for Requests for Production of Documents and/or Admissions 

[The parties are expected to serve requests for production and/or requests for

admission on opposing counsel or a pro se party on a schedule that allows timely

responses on or before the discovery cut-off date.]

10. DATES FOR FURTHER CONFERENCES

[The magistrate judge will complete this section at the scheduling conference if

he or she has not already set deadlines by an order filed before the conference.]

a. Status conferences will be held in this case at the following dates and

times:

__________________________________________________________ .

b. A final pretrial conference will be held in this case on ____________ at

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 12
11

___o’clock m. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and

submitted to the court no later than seven (7) days before the final pretrial

conference. 

11. OTHER SCHEDULING MATTERS

a. Identify those discovery or scheduling issues, if any, on which counsel

after a good faith effort, were unable to reach an agreement.

b. Anticipated length of trial and whether trial is to the court or jury.

c. Identify pretrial proceedings, if any, that the parties believe may be more

efficiently or economically conducted in the District Court’s facilities at 212

N. Wahsatch Street, Colorado Springs, Colorado; Wayne Aspinall U.S.

Courthouse/Federal Building, 402 Rood Avenue, Grand Junction,

Colorado; or the U.S. Courthouse/Federal Building,103 Sheppard Drive,

Durango, Colorado.

[Determination of any such request will be made by the magistrate judge based

on the individual needs of the case and the availability of space and security resources.]

12. NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

[The following paragraphs shall be included in the scheduling order:]

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with

D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1D. by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served

upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.

Counsel will be expected to be familiar and to comply with the Pretrial and Trial

Procedures or Practice Standards established by the judicial officer presiding over the

trial of this case.

With respect to discovery disputes, parties must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR

7.1A.

In addition to filing an appropriate notice with the clerk's office, a pro se party

must file a copy of a notice of change of his or her address or telephone number with

the clerk of the magistrate judge assigned to this case.

In addition to filing an appropriate notice with the clerk's office, counsel must file

a copy of any motion for withdrawal, motion for substitution of counsel, or notice of

change of counsel's address or telephone number with the clerk of the magistrate judge

assigned to this case.

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 12
12

13. AMENDMENTS TO SCHEDULING ORDER

[Include a statement that the scheduling order may be altered or amended only

upon a showing of good cause.]

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this ____ day of , 20 .

BY THE COURT:

 

United States Magistrate Judge

APPROVED:

 s/ s/

________________________________ ________________________________

(Name) (Name)

(Address) (Address)

(Telephone Number) (Telephone Number)

Attorney for Plaintiff (or Plaintiff, Pro Se) Attorney for Defendant (or Defendant,

Pro Se)

[Please affix counsels' and any pro se party's signatures before submission of the final

scheduling order to the court.]

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 81 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 12