alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3488EM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Adam C. Risch, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 5, 1997 Filed: March 11, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. In an earlier appeal, we affirmed Adam C. Risch’s drug convicti on but remanded to permit the district court to conside r whether Risch’s sentence should be reduced under an amendment to the Sent encing Guidelines. United States v. Risch , 87 F.3d 240, 243-44 (8th Cir. 1996). On remand, th e district court sentenced Risch to the statutory minimum for an offens e involving 100 or moremarijuana plants. Although Risch did not raise the issuein his first appeal, Risch now challenges the number of marijuan a plants attributed to him. Based on Risch’s fail ure to raise this issue in his original appeal, we will not consider Risch’s new claim. See United States v. Kress , 58 F.3d 370, 373-74 (8th Cir. 1 995). We overrule Risch’s objection to the no-argument classification of this appeal. We affirm Risch’s sentence.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (343 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (15 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (13 KB PDF)
Flows tables (141 KB PDF)
Level tables (117 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (18 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (38 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates |
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 8, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30173 

Conference Calendar

__________________

ALAN CLEMENTS,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID DILLON, Sergeant, RICHARD

L. STALDER, Warden; EDGAR C. DAY,

Warden,

 Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-93-3463-F

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from the magistrate judge's judgment

awarding costs to the nonprevailing party. The appellants argue

that, as the prevailing parties, they are entitled to the

awarding of costs. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment awarding

costs to the nonprevailing party for essentially the reasons 

given by the magistrate judge. Clements v. Dillon et al., No.

CA-93-3463-F (E.D. La. Nov. 23, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-3293-EM]


Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Florida (FEMA-3293-EM), dated September 7, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 19, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jeffery L. 
Bryant, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this declared emergency.
    This action terminates my appointment of Thomas P. Davies as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036; 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-24084 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1539 

To designate the post office located at 309 East Linn Street, Marshalltown, 

Iowa, as the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the post office located at 309 East Linn Street, 

Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAJOR SCOTT NISELY POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The post office located at 309 

5 East Linn Street, Marshalltown, Iowa, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the post office referred to in subsection (a) shall 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1539 IS

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Scott Nisely 

2 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### CHRISTIAN A. SIEBOLD, PROSECUTOR, v. JOSEPH H. MAYFIELD, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF RAMSEY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RAMSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Argued January 21, 1948

Decided February 19, 1948.

*513Before Justices Bodine, Heher and Wachenfeld.

For the prosecutor, *Weber & Muth*and *James A. Major.*

For Joseph H. Mayfield, *Doughty & Dwyer (Michael A.*Dwyer).

For Board of Adjustment and Borough of Ramsey, *Romeo Napolitano.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

This is a zoning case. The prosecutor of this writ is the owner of property at the corner of Airmount Avenue and Franklin Turnpike in the Borough of Ramsey. One of the defendants is the owner of premises on the opposite corner and the Board of Adjustment of the Borough and the Mayor and Council are the others.

For many years, the defendant Mayfield operated a garage on his property. The garage business was profitable because Franklin Turnpike was a through highway. Later this was changed because a new state highway was built in the neighborhood. As a result there was little or no business for him. Other business properties are being torn down or converted to residence purposes. His property is now surrounded by residences built with care and expense.

The action of the Board of Adjustment was predicated upon *R. S.*40:55 — 39 granting authority to authorize a variance which will not be contrary to the public interest. The variance was for use of the former garage for the winding, testing and assembling of small transformers or coils used in various electronic devices. The power plant was restricted to ten horsepower and the number of operators was fixed at ten. But the variance brought manufacturing into the area contrary to the ordinance.

We find in the record that the contemplated use will in all likelihood deteriorate the value of the prosecutor’s property. Once manufacturing comes into a district others follow. A spot use results and presently the character of the neighborhood is changed. The proofs indicate to-day a residential domination in the area in question.

*514The action taken seems to us not to be within the corners of the statute and the rulings of the court in *Sitgreaves*v. *Board of Adjustment of Nutley,*136 *N. J. L.*21; *Peterson*v. *Palisades*Park, 127 *Id.*190; *Cook v. Board of Adjustment of*Trenton, 118 *Id.*372; *Brandon*v. Montclair, 124 *Id.*135.

The variance will be set aside.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES F3 AND F4 ON THE COMPANY'S 10K.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            208,028
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     646,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                        7,000
<INVENTORY>                                     1,433,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,470,435
<PP&E>                                          5,216,544
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,585,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,538,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             714,785
<BONDS>                                           350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           41,007
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,435,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,538,157
<SALES>                                         5,350,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5,350,868
<CGS>                                           4,225,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,225,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,521,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                244,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (631,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (631,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (631,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.30)
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 22, 2018

No. 04-18-00378-CR

Manuel LEOS, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9616

Honorable Maria Teresa (Tessa) Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED 

FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on August 22, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of August, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58965-58966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR

[[Page 58966]]

Part 515, effective on the corresponding date shown below:
    License Number: 001912F.
    Name: Air-Ship Packers, Inc.
    Address: 530 East Goetz Ave., Santa Ana, CA 92707.
    Date Revoked: September 27, 2008.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021125N.
    Name: Ebayanbox.com. Inc.
    Address: 100 North Brand Blvd., Glendale, CA 91203.
    Date Revoked: September 26, 2008.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 001832NF.
    Name: Rohde & Liesenfeld Inc. dba Windrose Line.
    Address: 240 West 35th Street, Ste. 1201, New York, NY 10001.
    Date Revoked: September 18, 2008.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 018573F.
    Name: Joe Souquette dba Souquette Forwarding International.
    Address: 8531 Farralone Ave., West Hills, CA 91304.
    Date Revoked: September 27, 2008.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 019267N.
    Name: Seagold (USA), Inc.
    Address: 262 West 38th Street, Ste 406, New York, NY 10018.
    Date Revoked: September 26, 2008.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E8-23871 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495,

Defendants.

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Brimmer, J.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b),

United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to conduct proceedings

in this civil action as follows:

(X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a

scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2.

(X) Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for

compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or

modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause.

(X) Convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as

may facilitate resolution of this case.

(X) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other nondispositive motions.

( ) Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed

findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions.

(X) Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 5 filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
2

IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to

proceed according to the designations marked (X) above.

Dated August 12, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Philip A. Brimmer 

Philip A. Brimmer

United States District Judge

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 5 filed 08/12/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02697-BNB

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOUNTAIN STATES LINE CONSTRUCTORS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND

TRAINING COMMITTEE,

Defendant.

ORDER ASSIGNING CASE

On completion of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, tit

appears that this case is not appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, this case is

being assigned to District Judge Robert E. Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR

40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Kathleen M. Tafoya. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2D. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to District Judge Robert E.

Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Kathleen

M. Tafoya.

DATED November 1, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02697-REB Document 4 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATING FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         824,019
<SECURITIES>                                   142,569
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,972
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      11,269,660
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,346,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,055,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      9,121,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,690,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,055,709
<SALES>                                      3,561,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,827,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,502,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,043
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             803,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                252,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            252,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (154,062)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The partnership has an unclassified balance sheet; therefore the value is $0.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS2, as follows:

     1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7122

In Re: CLARENCE HICKS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-2076-L) Submitted: December 15, 2004 Decided: January 11, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition granted by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Hicks, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Clarence Hicks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion in the District Court for the District of Maryland on June 19, 2002, attacking his 2000 criminal conviction and 360-month sentence. The Government responded to the motion on October 17, 2002, and Hicks replied to the response in November of that year. No further action has been taken in the case with the exception of numerous motions filed by Hicks. Hicks has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus complaining of the district court’s delay in acting on this case. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21(b) and 4th Cir. R. 21, the Government was directed to answer the petition and has done so. The Government offers no explanation for the delay in the case. Writs of habeas corpus are intended to afford a speedy remedy to those illegally restrained. Johnson v. Rogers , 917 F.2d 1283, 1284 (10th Cir. 1990). P ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1657(a) (2000), the district court must give priority to habeas corpus cases over other civil cases. As we conclude that Hicks has established a clear and indisputable right to expeditious treatment of his § 2255 motion, and no other adequate remedy is available, we find that he has shown his entitlement to the writ of mandamus. SeeAllied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Therefore, the petition for writ of- 3 - mandamus is granted. The district court is ordered to act on case No. 02-2076 within sixty days of the date of this opinion. We grant Hicks leave to proceed in forma pauperis; we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION GRANTED