alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

Order 

December 23, 2020

161797

161805

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161797

COA: 343818

Arenac CC: 17-004120-FH

MICHELINE NICOLE LEFFEW,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161805

COA: 344240

Arenac CC: 17-004119-FH

JEREMIAH JAMES LEFFEW,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the April 9, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on the applications. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellants shall each file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of 

this order addressing whether the common law affirmative defense of defense of others 

may be raised as a defense to the felony and misdemeanor charges against them, see 

People v Dupree, 486 Mich 693 (2010); People v Triplett, 499 Mich 52 (2016), and 

whether trial defense counsels’ failure to request such an instruction deprived the 

defendants of the effective assistance of counsel, see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 

668 (1984). In addition to the brief, the appellants shall electronically file an appendix 

conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the briefs, citations to the record must provide the 

appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2 020

s1216

2

Clerk

supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellants’ briefs. The 

appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use 

of the appendix filed by the appellants. Replies, if any, must be filed by the appellants 

within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit 

mere restatements of their application papers.

The total time allowed for oral argument shall be 40 minutes: 20 minutes for the 

appellants to be divided at their discretion, and 20 minutes for the appellee. MCR 

7.314(B)(2).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in these cases may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Motions for permission to file briefs amicus 

curiae and briefs amicus curiae regarding these cases should be filed in People v 

Micheline Nicole Leffew, Docket No. 161797, only and served on the parties in both 

cases.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00409-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WILLIAM G. BALLANTINE,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure that all

pre-trial phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by Tuesday, November 1,

2011, and responses to these motions shall be filed by Monday, November 14, 2011.

It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on all pending motions, if necessary, and

final trial preparation conference will be set at a future date upon the request of counsel. 

It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that a 5-day jury trial is set for Monday, December 12,

2011, at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002.
-2-

Dated: October 12, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 18, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, November 18, 2008, at 9 a.m., Eastern Time via a telephone 
conference call. For more information or to confirm attendance, 
notification if intent to attend the meeting must be made with Audrey 
Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085. If you would like to have 
the TAP consider a written statement, please write Audrey Y. Jenkins, 
TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, 
or you can post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E8-23630 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________
No. 97-41068 Summary Calendar

____________________
JAMES FAGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LUCINDA L. CONRAD; TOMMY E. THOMAS, Officer at Michael Unit; BILLY J. SCARBOROUGH, Officer at

Michael Unit,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:97-CV-61

June 30, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Faga n, Texas prisoner #404390, appeals the magistrate

judge’s adverse summary judgment, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action. Fagan contends, inter alia, that the defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs (broken jaw)

by delaying medical treatment for over two hours.

Needless to say, we review a summary judgment de novo ,
applying the same standard as the district court. S ee Little v.- 2 -

Liquid Air Corp. , 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).

Summary judgment is proper where there is no material fact issue

and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. I d. ;

see F ED .R.C IV .P. 56( C ).

Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we

AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.

Fagan v. Conrad
, No. 6:97-CV61 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 1997). Fagan’s

motions for a “default judgment” and for appointment of appellate

counsel are DENIED

.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned  officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage  Securities Corp., a
Delaware  corporation (the "Company")  hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE  SECURITIES
CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-AR1, as follows:

     1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

     2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

     3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate
on behalf of the Company.

     4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

     5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 159 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the White Rocks National Recreation Area 

in the State of Vermont as the ‘‘Robert T. Stafford 

White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

S 159 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL 

2 RECREATION AREA. 

3 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The White Rocks National 

4 Recreation Area in the State of Vermont, as established 

5 by section 202 of the Vermont Wilderness Act of 1984 

6 (16 U.S.C. 460nn–1), is redesignated as the ‘‘Robert T. 

7 Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the recreation area referred to in subsection (a) 

11 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Robert T. Stafford 

12 White Rocks National Recreation Area. 

Passed the Senate January 4, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02643-BNB

ANTONIO DWAN WILLIAMS,

Applicant,

v.

MR. CHAPDLAINE, Warden, and

JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado,

Respondents.

ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed on October 11, 2011, in this action and

pursuant to Denson v. Abbott, 554 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has

determined that a limited Pre-Answer Response is appropriate. Respondents are

directed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United

States District Courts to file a Pre-Answer Response limited to addressing the

affirmative defenses of timeliness under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) and/or exhaustion of state

court remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). If Respondents do not intend to raise

either of these affirmative defenses, they must notify the Court of that decision in the

Pre-Answer Response. Respondents may not file a dispositive motion as their PreAnswer Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in

response to this Order.

Case 1:11-cv-02643-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
 In support of the Pre-Answer Response, Respondents should attach as exhibits

all relevant portions of the state court record, including but not limited to copies of all

documents demonstrating whether this action is filed in a timely manner and/or whether

Applicant has exhausted state court remedies.

Applicant may reply to the Pre-Answer Response and provide any information

that might be relevant to the one-year limitation period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)

and/or the exhaustion of state court remedies. Applicant also should include

information relevant to equitable tolling, specifically as to whether he has pursued his

claims diligently and whether some extraordinary circumstance prevented him from

filing a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action in this Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty one (21) days from the date of this Order

Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty one (21) days of the filing of the

Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the

affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, they must

notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response.

DATED November 1, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02643-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 We, Andrew F. Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Phillip A.
Reinsch, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Capstead Mortgage
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: October 29, 2004
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive Officer Date: October 29, 2004
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

A PPOINTMENT TO CONTINUING JUDICIAL EDUCATION BOARD OF JUDGES :

:

:

:

: NO. 927

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIA M

AND NOW, this 6 th day of December , 2022 , the Honorable Shawn C. Wagner

, Adams County

, is hereby appointed as a member of the Continuing Judicial Education

Board of Judges for a term of three years, commencing December 31, 2022

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

In the notice appearing on page 57590, FR Doc E8-23317, Procurement List Additions & Deletions, on October 3, 2008, the Committee published the following product and NSN (Bag, Sand, Polypropylene, 26″ x 14″, 8105-01-467-0402). 

This notice corrects the size for the above mentioned product and NSN to Bag, Sand, Polypropylene, 20″ x 14″, 8105-01-467-0402. 

Barry S. Lineback, 

Acting Director, Program Operations.

 [FR Doc. E8-24147 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 28, 2008.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

*1. Peggy J. Wisdom, M.D.*, Edmond, Oklahoma, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Grace V. Wisdom, to retain control of Grace Investment Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain control of Alva State Bank and Trust Company, both of Alva, Oklahoma, and First National Bank in Okeene, Okeene, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 8, 2008.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E8-24345 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### In the Matter of Marina K. Whitfield, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[745 NYS2d 738]

Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default *(see Matter of Hopkins,*295 AD2d 1014; *Matter of Hysert,*291 AD2d 937). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



May 12, 1999



The Board of Directors
Spalding Holdings Corporation
Chicopee, Massachusetts

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Spalding Holdings Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company")
for the periods ended April 3, 1999 and March 31, 1998, as indicated in our
report dated May 6, 1999; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on the information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-14569 on Form S-8 of
Spalding Holdings Corporation.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
EXHIBIT 13



CERTIFICATION



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Millea Holdings, Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended March
31, 2005 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Kunio Ishihara, the principal executive officer, and Tomohiro
Kotani, the principal financial officer, of Millea Holdings, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Millea Holdings, Inc.



Date: September 28, 2005



By:

/s/ KUNIO ISHIHARAName: Kunio IshiharaTitle:   President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/ TOMOHIRO KOTANIName: Tomohiro KotaniTitle:   Managing Director(Principal Financial Officer)
Filed 1/12/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 4

Casey O. Berg, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Toni N. Wysocki n/k/a

Toni N. Bosma, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20100179

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Debbie Gordon Kleven, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Patti J. Jensen (argued), 1312 Central Avenue North East, P.O. Box 386, East Grand Forks, MN 56721-0386, for plaintiff and appellant.

Leslie Johnson Aldrich (argued), 1018 1st Avenue North, Fargo, ND 58102- 4602, for defendant and appellee.

Berg v. Wysocki

No. 20100179

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Casey O. Berg appealed from a district court judgment awarding Toni N. Bosma (formerly known as Toni N. Wysocki) primary residential responsibility of their child.  Berg was awarded parenting time.  Berg argues the district court erred by using independent investigation to question a witness during trial, the court erred by refusing to allow evidence on handguns in Bosma’s home, and the court “abused its discretion” in awarding primary residential responsibility to Bosma.  We summarily affirm the judgment.

[¶2]The judge’s investigation was done in the parties’ and their counsels’ presence without objection.  “A party must object when the alleged error occurs so the trial court may take appropriate action, if possible, to remedy any prejudice that may have resulted.”  Frueh v. Frueh, 2009 ND 155, ¶ 19, 771 N.W.2d 593 (quoting Khokha v. Shahin, 2009 ND 110, ¶ 16, 767 N.W.2d 159).  Failure to object to a perceived error at trial may operate as a waiver of that objection.  Id.  Berg waived his objection to the judge’s investigation.  N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

[¶3]Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), the district court did not clearly err in awarding Bosma primary residential responsibility, and under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), the district court did not abuse its discretion on the admission of evidence on handguns.

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom