alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUFUS CATCHINGS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SALLY JEWELL,* in her official capacity

as Secretary of the Interior; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-17116

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00625-THE

MEMORANDUM**

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 23, 2014*** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Rufus Catchings appeals pro se from a magistrate judge’s order requiring

him to execute a settlement agreement in his Title VII action alleging racial

FILED

OCT 7 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * Sally Jewell has been substituted for her predecessor, Ken Salazar, as

Secretary of the Interior under Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

 ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discrimination. We dismiss the appeal and vacate the district court’s 2012 order.

Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the district court entered a final order

dismissing the action with prejudice in 2011, and did not retain jurisdiction. The

district court, therefore, lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue a magistrate

judge order enforcing the settlement in 2012. See Arizonans for Official English v.

Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 73 (1997) (this court has an obligation to inquire into its

subject matter jurisdiction and that of the lower court); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life

Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994) (concluding that the district court

lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a motion to enforce settlement following

entry of a stipulated dismissal with prejudice where there was no provision in the

settlement agreement retaining jurisdiction, and the settlement agreement was not

incorporated into the order dismissing with prejudice). 

The notice of appeal is untimely as to the district court’s 2011 order

dismissing the case with prejudice based on the parties’ settlement. Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1)(B)(iii) (“The notice of appeal may be filed by any party within 60 days

after entry of the judgment or order appealed from if one of the parties is . . . a

United States officer or employee sued in an official capacity[.]”); Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(7)(A)(ii) (where a separate judgment is required but not entered, judgment is

deemed entered 150 days after entry of the final order that the party seeks to

2 12-17116
appeal); Browder v. Dir., Dep’t. of Corr. of Ill., 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (timely

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is mandatory and jurisdictional). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and vacate the district court’s 2012

order.

APPEAL DISMISSED; District Court Order VACATED.

3 12-17116
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. IS08-405-000] 

                    Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding on Thursday, October 23, 2008, at 9 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                           ( print page 60687)    

                    The Commission's August 22, 2008 Order [1]                                          directed that a technical conference be held to address Dixie's FERC Nos. 92 and 93, which would permit batched shipping of refinery grade propylene on the Dixie pipeline.                 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or (202) 208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All parties and staff are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Jenifer Lucas at (202) 502-8362 or                     *Jenifer.Lucas@ferc.gov*.                 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Dixie Pipeline Company*, 124 FERC ¶ 61,175 (2008).                     
        Back to Citation      

 [FR Doc. E8-24276 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00433-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ANTHONY C. JONES,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On May 23, 2012, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference to reset

the sentencing hearing in this matter. After conferring with counsel and with their

consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on August 17, 2012, commencing at 10:00 a.m., the court shall conduct

the sentencing hearing in this matter;

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing;

and

3. That the telephonic setting conference set for May 24, 2012, is VACATED.

Dated: May 23, 2012

1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.
389 A.2d 700

#### Smith, Appellant, v. State Police Civic Association, Inc.

Argued March 14, 1978.

Allen H. Smith, for appellant;

John C. Sullivan, with him Nauman, Smith, Shis-sler & Hall, for appellee.

Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1772 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1772

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 127 South Elm Street in Gardner, Kansas, as the ``Private First 
                  Class Shane R. Austin Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2007

 Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 127 South Elm Street in Gardner, Kansas, as the ``Private First 
                  Class Shane R. Austin Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS SHANE R. AUSTIN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 127 South Elm Street in Gardner, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Private First Class Shane R. Austin Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Shane R. Austin Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     See accompanying notes.
     $ in thousands except per share data
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-25-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         27,066
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    15,798
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,379
<PP&E>                                         63,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          51,259
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       223
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,676
<SALES>                                        67,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          39,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               40
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,535
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .47



</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 9, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.131 Funding Corporations1** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-WJM-BNB

DALIP BASANTI,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,

JASON ROZESKI, M.D.,

PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, and

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Motion to

Compel Payment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(b)(4)(E) [docket no. 111, filed February 15, 2013]

(the “Motion”).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Payment

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(b)(4)(E) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED: February 19, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02765-PAB-NYW Document 114 Filed 02/19/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02352-CMA-BNB

GERARDO LOPEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

AURORA POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL PRINCE, in his individual capacity, and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AGENT ELIZABETH BOGESSE, in her

individual capacity,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Good cause having been shown,

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Boggess’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Conference

and to Stay Discovery [Doc. # 38, filed 1/20/2012] is GRANTED;

(2) The Scheduling Conference set for February 29, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., is

VACATED;

(3) Discovery is STAYED pending a ruling on the defendants’ motions to dismiss

[Docs. ## 32 and 36]; and

(4) The parties shall file a status report within ten days of any ruling on the pending

motions to dismiss addressing the status of the case and the pretrial matters, if any, to be

scheduled.

DATED: January 24, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02352-CMA-BNB Document 41 Filed 01/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1**  **335**

ROSS A. FIORANI, JR. ,

P laintiff

- Appellant ,
and

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT; AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK; MERRIFIELD, VIRGINIA; BARCLAYS BANK; TD BANK; WEST PUBLISHING; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; VIRGINIA TAX DEPARTMENT; FAIRFAX COUNTY TAX AUT HORITY; CAPITAL ONE, (401K/Roth) ,
Plaintiffs ,

v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al; COMMISSIONERS OF THE TREASURY; DMV; MVDB; VITA ’ S AGENTS; MR. CANARY; MS. BROWN; MS. WOOD

- HE NRY; MS. ESTES; SAMUEL A. NIXON, JR., et al ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. James R. Spencer , Senior District Judge. ( 3 :1 4

- cv
- 0 0 216

- JRS )

Submitted : October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Ross A. Fiorani, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PE R CURIAM:
Ross A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s

order dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Fiorani v. Commonwealth of Va. , No.

3:14

- cv
- 00216

- JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 1, 2014) . We dispense with
oral argument because the fa cts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### CHASE & SHERMAN v. SUNBEAM CORP.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Lone Moose Adventures, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), We, Christopher B. Glover, President and Director and
Michael Brown, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 6/16/2004                       /s/Christopher B. Glover
                                      Christopher B. Glover
                                      President and director


Date: 6/16/2004                       /s/Michael C. Brown
                                      Michael Brown
                                      Secretary/Treasurer and director
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF WORLD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION:

      World Information Technology, Inc., a corporation organized under the
Company Law of the Republic of China ("World Info China")

      Shanghai Bofeng Internet Technology Co. Ltd., a company organized in the
People's Republic of China

DIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF WORLD INFO CHINA

      International Joyful Shopping Mall Internet Business Co., Ltd., a company
organized under the Company Law of the Republic of China

      Yong-Kun-Chen Technology Co., Ltd., a company organized under the Company
Law of the Republic of China
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 11A


                         PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc.

             Computation of Net Income per Share of Common Stock -
                                     Primary

           (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Three months ended
                                                                                          December 31,
                                                                               ---------------------------------
                                                                                    1995               1994
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                            <C>                <C>
 Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period                                  30,945             27,528

 Weighted average number of shares issued during the period in
    connection with compensation awarded in stock and exercise of
    stock options                                                                       39                 20

 Dilutive shares issuable, net of shares assumed to have been
    purchased (at the average market price) for treasury with
    assumed proceeds from:

        Contingent exercise of stock options                                           600                682

        Registered equity purchase contracts                                            64                  1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total shares - primary                                                             31,648             28,231
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Net income                                                                    $    27,979        $    20,057
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 Primary earnings per share                                                    $      0.88        $      0.71
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


                                       14
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1612 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1612

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To amend the penalty provisions in the International Emergency Economic 
                   Powers Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``International Emergency Economic 
Powers Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF IEEPA.

    (a) In General.--Section 206 of the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 206. PENALTIES.

    ``(a) Unlawful Acts.--It shall be unlawful for a person to violate, 
attempt to violate, conspire to violate, or cause a violation of any 
license, order, regulation, or prohibition issued under this title.
    ``(b) Civil Penalty.--A civil penalty may be imposed on any person 
who commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) in an amount 
not to exceed the greater of--
        ``(1) $250,000; or
        ``(2) an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction 
    that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the 
    penalty is imposed.
    ``(c) Criminal Penalty.--A person who willfully commits, willfully 
attempts to commit, or willfully conspires to commit, or aids or abets 
in the commission of, an unlawful act described in subsection (a) 
shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, or if a 
natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 20 years, or 
both.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
        (1) Civil penalties.--Section 206(b) of the International 
    Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended by subsection (a), shall 
    apply to violations described in section 206(a) of such Act with 
    respect to which enforcement action is pending or commenced on or 
    after the date of the enactment of this Act.
        (2) Criminal penalties.--Section 206(c) of the International 
    Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended by subsection (a), shall 
    apply to violations described in section 206(a) of such Act with 
    respect to which enforcement action is commenced on or after the 
    date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```