alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1791-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Texas (FEMA-1791-DR), dated September 13, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 3, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective October 2, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036; Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E8-24090 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
178 La. 1065

#### CORTEZ v. DUFFY.

No. 21865.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 29, 1934.

Frank P. Kreiger, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Theodore Cotonio and Theodore Cotonio, Jr., both of New Orleans, for appellee.

OVERTON, Justice.

This case was before us in June, 1932, on a motion made by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal. The appeal was maintained as a devolu-tive appeal. The case is stated on the motion to dismiss, as follows:

> “Mariano Cortez sued Katie Duffy Cortez, his wife, for a divorce, alleging that they had been living apart for more than seven years-Act No. 269 of. 1916. . .

*760Defendant denied the separation averred in the petition; and reconvened for a divorce in her favor, grounding her action on the alleged adultery of her husband.

“An exception of no cause of action urged by way of objection to evidence on the trial of the case was sustained by the court below and the main demand was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The trial was then proceeded with on the reconventional demand, resulting, also, in the dismissal of that demand as in the case of nonsuit.” Cortez v. Cortez, 175 La. 179, 143 So. 41, 42.

Plaintiff now files a second motion to dismiss the appeal and also a plea of res judi-cata, the latter, apparently, as an alternative plea. Both the motion and the plea rest upon the ground that since the first motion to dismiss was decided, plaintiff instituted a second suit for divorce on the same ground that the first suit rests upon, and obtained a final judgment of divorce. Plaintiff has attached to one of the pleas a certified copy of the judgment, showing that a judgment was signed on March 27, 1933, forever dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between plaintiff- and defendant, and awarding the custody of the child, born of the marriage, to defendant.

The theory on which the motion to dismiss is grounded is that, a final judgment having been pronounced and signed in the case, this terminates the litigation now pending between the parties, and there remains nothing to adjudge on this appeal. The theory upon which the plea of res adjudicata rests is that the marriage having been finally dissolved in another suit below, the question of divorce may not be inquired into any longer.

The case should be remanded to the lower court to permit the introduction in evidence of the judgment relied on as well as to permit the introduction of th'e pleadings and citation on which it rests, and the' minutes of court, to the end that this court may pass upon the motion and plea ; the record, as thus made up, to be returned to this court, on this appeal, without the rendition of judgment below, including such legal evidence, if any, that defendant may desire to offer.

The case is remanded to the lower court for the purpose stated in the preceding paragraph, and, after these directions are complied with, the record is ordered returned to this court on the present appeal.

O’NIELL, O. J., absent.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with Florida Community Banks, Inc.'s ("Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 ("Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") and to
which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Guy W. Harris, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            April
      15, 2009
            By:
            /s/  Guy W.
  HarrisGuy
      W. HarrisPrincipal
      Financial Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Florida Community Banks, Inc. and will be retained by Florida Community Banks,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME 6-30-97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         544,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,303,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,912
<INVENTORY>                                  2,180,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,122,484
<PP&E>                                       3,529,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                 923,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,642,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,095,365
<BONDS>                                      2,087,523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,984,026
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,028,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,642,479
<SALES>                                     10,160,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,160,467
<CGS>                                        5,841,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,841,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             187,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                939,992
<INCOME-TAX>                                   327,453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            612,539
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   612,539
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .072
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .072
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mortgage  Assistance Center  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard  Coleman,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  August 20, 2007                       By:  /s/ Richard D. Coleman
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Richard D. Coleman
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (principal accounting officer)
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1640 

To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel 

hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull and a deck. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. KOHL, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel hull design protection), to clarify the 

definitions of a hull and a deck. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VESSEL HULL DESIGN PROTECTION. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2007’’. 

6 (b) DESIGNS PROTECTED.—Section 1301(a) of title 

7 17, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph 

8 (2) and inserting the following: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 1640 IS

1 ‘‘(2) VESSEL FEATURES.—The design of a ves2 sel hull, deck, or combination of a hull and deck, in3 cluding a plug or mold, is subject to protection 

4 under this chapter, notwithstanding section 

5 1302(4).’’. 

6 (c) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1301(b) of title 17, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘vessel hull, 

9 including a plug or mold,’’ and inserting ‘‘vessel hull 

10 or deck, including a plug or mold,’’; 

11 (2) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘(4) A ‘hull’ is the exterior frame or body of a 

14 vessel, exclusive of the deck, superstructure, masts, 

15 sails, yards, rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other 

16 attachments.’’; and 

17 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(7) A ‘deck’ is the horizontal surface of a ves19 sel that covers the hull, including exterior cabin and 

20 cockpit surfaces, and exclusive of masts, sails, yards, 

21 rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other attachments.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for 1

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations

of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate

Judge for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-4202

___________

Ronaldo S. Ligons, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 * Appeal from the United States

Frank W. Wood; James H. Bruton; * District Court for the 

Erik William Skon; Thomas Dowdle;* District of Minnesota

Charles H. Jakway; Otis Zanders; *

James Zawacki; David Oelrich; * [UNPUBLISHED]

John Does; Mary Roes, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 30, 1996

 Filed: June 5, 1996

___________

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ronaldo S. Ligons appeals the district court's dismissal with

1

prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the

record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the judgment of the

district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Ligons's motions on appeal.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This  Amendment No. 1 is made to that certain  Employment  Agreement  dated
July 1, 1991 (the "Employment  Agreement") between Conseco, Inc. (the "Company")
and Lawrence W. Inlow ("Executive").

     NOW THEREFORE,  in consideration  of the mutual covenants  contained herein
and in the Employment Agreement, Company and Executive agree as follows:

     1. Section 2 of the Employment  Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety
to read as follows:

     "2.  Term.  The  effective  date of this  Agreement  shall be July 1, 1991.
Subject to the provisions for termination as provided in Section 10 hereof,  the
term of this  Agreement  shall be the period  beginning July 1, 1991, and ending
December 31, 2001 (hereinafter called the "Basic Employment Period")."

     2.  Except as  modified  by this  Amendment  and any  previous  addendum or
amendment  not in conflict  herewith,  the parties  confirm that the  Employment
Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Company and Executive have executed this Amendment
to be effective the 12th day of March, 1996.

                                        CONSECO, INC.



                                        By: /s/ Stephen C. Hilbert
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Stephen C. Hilbert,
                                            Chairman of the Board

                                                   "Company"



                                           /s/ Lawrence W. Inlow
                                           ------------------------------
                                            Lawrence W. Inlow

                                             "Executive"
Case Number: 1 1-CV-1573 Defendant:

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS PROVIDER

NETWORK, LLC

Defendant’s Attorney:

Name: Margaret Parnell Hogan, Atty. Reg. #038498

mphogan(21itt1er.cornKalisha Salome Chorba, Atty. Reg. #4 1294kchorba@littler.com

Address: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

1200 17th Street

Suite 1000

Denver, CO 80202.5835

Phone Number: 303.629.6200

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE coming to be heard on Defendant Quest Diagnostics Provider Network,

LLC’s Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Answer Or Otherwise Respond ToPlaintiffis Complaint, due notice having been given, and the Court having been duly advised on

the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:Defendant’s Motion is granted. The Court grants Defendant ten (10) additional days to

submit its answer or other responsive pleading, up to and including September 22, 2011. 

day of 

BRIDGET ESPINOZA, Dated this 

BY THE COURT:DISTRICT COURT

EXHIBIT F

Case Number: 

0

CV

573

Case Name: ESPINOZA, BRIDGET vs. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS PROVIDER NETWORK LLC

Court Authorizer: John Wheeler

Is! Judge John Wheeler
AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT





This amendment to the Stock Option Agreement between EAU Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and __________, an individual resident of the State of Georgia (the “Employee”), is entered into on the ____ day of March, 2011.





WHEREAS, the Company issued to Employee a Stock Option Agreement dated _________, 20__ between the Company and the Employee (the “Stock Option Agreement”);





WHEREAS, on September 20, 2010 the Board of Directors of the Company approved to amend the Stock Option Agreement; and





WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Stock Option Agreement and document the adjustment as approved by the Board of Directors;





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree as follows:





I.           The Stock Option Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “$____” and replacing it with “$0.31.”





II.          Except as specifically amended hereby, the Stock Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as prior to the amendment.





III.         This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  The parties agree that signatures transmitted and received via facsimile shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as original signatures and shall be deemed valid, binding and enforceable by and against all parties.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have each executed and delivered this agreement as of the date first shown above.





EMPLOYEE:Print Name: ________________________________________THE COMPANY:EAU TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:Name: Wade R. BradleyTitle: Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-PO-01133-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. CAMERON JORDAN McARTHUR,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Sentencing previously scheduled for December 9,

2011 at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED and RESCHEDULED for December 9, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. before

the Magistrate Judge in Durango, Colorado.

DATED: November 5, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-po-01133-DW Document 31 Filed 11/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02664-BNB

DARIAN L. HUNTER,

Applicant,

v.

J. WANDS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution (F.C.I.), Florence,

Respondent.

ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed on October 13, 2011, in this case and

pursuant to Redmon v. Wiley, 550 F. Supp. 2d 1275 (D. Colo. 2008), the Court has

determined that a limited Preliminary Response is appropriate. Respondent is directed

pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States

District Courts to file a Preliminary Response limited to addressing the affirmative

defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies. If Respondent does not intend to

raise this affirmative defense, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the

Preliminary Response. Respondent may not file a dispositive motion as a Preliminary

Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address the merits of the claims in response to

this Order.

 In support of the Preliminary Response, Respondent should attach as exhibits

copies of any administrative grievances Applicant has filed raising the issues asserted in

the Application, as well as any responses to those grievances. Applicant may reply to

Case 1:11-cv-02664-LTB Document 9 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

the Preliminary Response and provide any information that might be relevant to his

efforts to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order

Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the

Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative

defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of

that decision in the Preliminary Response.

DATED November 21, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02664-LTB Document 9 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with Florida Community Banks, Inc.'s ("Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 ("Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") and to
which this certification is furnished as an exhibit, I, Stephen L. Price, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
            April
      15, 2009
            By:
            /s/  Stephen
      L. PriceStephen
      L. Price, Principal Executive Officer, President and Chief Executive
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Florida Community Banks, Inc. and will be retained by Florida Community Banks,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Mollie Ward COE v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without .opinion.

*916I
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (377 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (30 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (12 KB PDF)
Flows tables (139 KB PDF)
Level tables (116 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (18 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (28 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (632 KB) | 
Data Download Program (DDP)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 8, 2007