alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         156,792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,876
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,172
<PP&E>                                         262,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (29,017)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,515,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,511
<OTHER-SE>                                    (667,512)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,924
<SALES>                                         56,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,681
<CGS>                                           25,208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,684,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (8,259)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,644,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,644,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,644,715)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2949

___________

Mary Lickteig, *

*

Plaintiff/Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Robert Kolar, Jr., * 

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant/Appellee. *

*

*

*

___________

Submitted: May 14, 2009

Filed: June 7, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, EBEL*

 and CLEVENGER**, Circuit Judges.

___________

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

On September 17, 2009, this Court issued an "Order for Certification

*

 The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.

** The Honorable Raymond C. Clevenger III, United States Circuit

Judge for the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.
of Questions of State Law," Lickteig v. Kolar, Jr., No. 08-2949 (8th Cir.

Sept. 17, 2009) to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota certifying

three questions of Minnesota state law to that Court. On May 27, 2010, the

Minnesota Supreme Court issued an opinion answering those three

questions. Lickteig v. Kolar, ----N.W.2d----, 2010 WL 2103997 (Minn.

2010).

On the basis of the answers provided by the Minnesota Supreme

Court in this matter, the district court order this case is REVERSED and

this matter is REMANDED to the U.S. District Court for the District of

Minnesota for further proceedings consistent with our Order of

Certification and the Supreme Court's opinion answering the certified

questions presented to it.

 

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 24, 2008, 8 a.m. to 
October 25, 2008, 5 p.m., Holiday Inn-Express Hotel and Suites, San 
Francisco Fisherman's Wharf, 550 North Point Street, San Francisco, CA, 
94133 which was published in the Federal Register on September 19, 
2008, 73 FR 54408-54411.
    The meeting will be held one day only October 24, 2008: The meeting 
time and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-23183 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 16, 2021

No. 04-19-00781-CV

Ernest BUSTOS,

Appellant

v.

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ET AL.,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-16392

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due June 25, 2021. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32
 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) that the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
such period and results of operations of the Company for such period. Date: March 26, 2007
By:
/s/Donald L. Denney
  President and Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer)  Date: March 26, 2007
And:
/s/Ralph A. Micalizzi, Jr.
  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial Officer) 110
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1585 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa, 

Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2007 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. COBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ernest Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ERNEST CHILDERS DEPART4 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT 

5 CLINIC. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs Outpatient Clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall be 

8 known and designated as the ‘‘Ernest Childers Depart9 ment of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1585 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula2 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

3 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Ernest 

5 Childers Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clin6 ic’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable A. J. Luokett 

County Attorney 

coma1 County 

llew Braunfels, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Rer Uould 

/ts a deed 

eque8ting the opinion of thir depar question reads aa 

iollous c 

County Clerk of 

attestation 

aats to be exeauted bj peraonr rubjeat-to mill.- 

tary “lav.“’ 

“Vernon*8 Texas Statute8 OD the artiale governing persons eligible to tak;lw aaknowledgments 

doea not lmalude U. 9. Anag Oifioials a8 notaries 

publIa. 
104 

Honorable A. J. Luck&t, page 2 

“The speaifia question that I vould apprealate your ansveMng is as foll0Vsr 

‘Yould an acknowledgment to a deed of aonvegance concernlug real estate taken under the 

foregoing be a legally suffialent aoknovledgment 

in the Stat0 or Texas? 

‘1 hare not born able to rind satisfaotory 

Texas authority OR the &bove questlon.and vould 

appreoiate your giving ma an opinion. 

Seatlon 1 or Artfclo 6602, Vernon*8 Annotated Clvll 

Statutes vas.:amended by House Bill Xo. 4, Acts of the 48th 

bglslature, Hegular Session, 1943. I: 

Hoase Bill 30. 4, supra, provides: 

%cct10n 1. Artlole 6602, Title 115, Chapter 

2 of the Revised Civil 3tatutea of Texas of 1925, 

Is hgreby amended so as to hereafter read as iollows; 

g*ArLrtlole 6602. 

OnThe aaknovledgment or proof or an lnstrunmnt or vrlting for record may be ssrde oft&In this 

State before : 

“‘1. A alerk of the dlstrlat Gouzt. 

“‘2. A judge or olerk of the bounty aourt. 

"'3. A notary public. 

‘Without the State, but within the United 

Staies or their territories before: 

“‘1. A alark 0r some oourt 0r record having 

a seal. 

“2. A commissioner of deed6 duly appointed 

under the laws of the State, 

T ;3. A notary publlt. 

.* 6 

* 4 
105 

i
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02428-CMA-BNB

JAMES KLEINERT, an individual,

SPIRIT RIDERS FOUNDATION, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation, and

DAVID GLYNN, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

v.

KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary,

 United States Department of Interior, ROBERT

ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Land Management,

STEVE BEVERLIN, in his official capacity as iField Manager,

 Dolores Public Lands Office

SALLY E. WISELY, in her official capacity as BLM Colorado State Director,

CONNIE CLEMENTSON, in her official capacity as Field Officer,

 Dolores Public Lands Office, and

GREG SHOOP, in his official capacity as District Manager, Royal Gorge Field Office,

Defendants.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

On September 16, 2011, a Notice of Disclosure (Doc. # 5) was issued, indicating

that “[a]ny party wishing to suggest recusal of Judge Arguello may do so within 10 days

from the date of this notice.” On September 26, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Recuse

(Doc. # 22). Based on my past professional relationship and present personal

friendship with Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar, I believe I should recuse myself. It is,

therefore,

Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 23 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. # 22) is GRANTED, the judge’s file be

returned to the clerk, and that the case be reassigned by random draw.

DATED: September 27 , 2011

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 23 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11

NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Statement of Computation of Earnings per Share

(Amounts in Thousands  Except Per Share Data)



|                                           |  |                                    |        |      |   |       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                                           |  | For the Three MonthsEnded March 31
|                                           |  | 2006                               |        | 2005
|                                           |  |                                   
|Net income                                 |  | $                                  | 5,586  |      | $ | 4,689 
|                                           |  |                                    |        |      |   |       
|Weighted average common shares outstanding |  |                                    | 15,005 |      |   | 15,005
|                                           |  |                                    |        |      |   |       
|Basic and diluted earnings per share       |  | $                                  | .37    |      | $ | .31   
|                                           |  |                                    |        |      |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-LTB

ANDRE BARTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY ECHEART, Adams County Jail,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 34) is DENIED because this action is closed. If

Plaintiff wishes to pursue any claims, he must commence a new action.

Dated: March 13, 2015

Case 1:11-cv-02339-LTB Document 35 Filed 03/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7770

EUGENE ARTHUR PORTER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus H. R. POWELL, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-272-3) Submitted: February 9, 1999 Decided: March 15, 1999 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Moore Barley, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Porter v. Powell , No. CA-98-272-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:11-cv-02553-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02553-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02553-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02553-LTB Document 5 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of PhotonicProducts Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the year ended December31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,William J. Foote, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of theCompany as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented.

Dated: September 29, 2006
|        | /s/ William J. Foote                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William J. Foote                                       |
|   | Vice President - Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

This certification has been furnished solely pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Sections 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2432]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 2 Williams Street, 
Chelsea, MA 02150, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils 
for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to 
conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited 
or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#325150421c5e53505a4372565a411c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ffcfdefb1f3fefdf7eedffbf7ecb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
July 24, 2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
July 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E8-2432 Filed 2-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1635 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1635

To provide for the reimbursement of wildland firefighters for the cost 
                  of professional liability insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2007

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Bingaman, and Mr. Domenici) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the reimbursement of wildland firefighters for the cost 
                  of professional liability insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER INSURANCE.

    Section 636 of division A of the Treasury, Postal Service, and 
General Government Appropriations Act, 1997 (5 U.S.C. prec. 5941 note; 
Public Law 104-208), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) a temporary fire line supervisor.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``, and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) the term `temporary fire line supervisor' means an 
        employee of the Department of the Interior or the Forest 
        Service whose duties include temporary supervision to manage a 
        wildland or managed fire, including an employee that is--
                    ``(A) a type 1, 2, or 3 incident commander;
                    ``(B) an operations section chief;
                    ``(C) a division group supervisor;
                    ``(D) a fire use manager; or
                    ``(E) a prescribed fire manager or burn boss.''.
                                 <all>
```
817 A.2d 316

#### IN THE MATTER OF DOUGLAS R. CLARK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

March 12, 2003.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-241, concluding that DOUGLAS R. CLARK formerly of HAMBURG, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.7(a) (conflict of interest), *RPC*1.8(a) (prohibited business transaction with client), and *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DOUGLAS R. CLARK is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

*554ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23a

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 333-72254 and 333-67438) pertaining to the Schawk, Inc. 1991
Outside Directors' Formula Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Equity Option Plan,
respectively, of our report dated February 14, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Schawk, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.




Chicago, Illinois                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
February 14, 2003