alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-046-CV

JEFFREY LYNN LEWIS	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	On March 8, 2010, we notified Appellant Jeffrey Lynn Lewis that we were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared that his notice of appeal was not timely filed.  We stated that the appeal might be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Lewis or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3.  

	Lewis filed a response to our jurisdiction letter stating that the State did not notify him of the default judgment “until late in January of 2010” and that he had immediately filed a request for permission to appeal.  However, Lewis’s “Request For Extension Of Time To File An Appeal,” which was filed on March 9, 2010, is defective because it was filed over a year after the fifteen-day deadline for filing a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal and because he failed to pay the filing fee and failed to provide a certificate of conference and a certificate of service.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.

	The trial court’s final judgment was signed on October 17, 2008.  Lewis did not file a motion for new trial, so his notice of appeal was due November 17, 2008.  Lewis, however, did not file his notice of appeal until February 8, 2010.

	The time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent a timely-filed notice of appeal or extension request, we must dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b), 26.3; Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex. 1998); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Chilkewitz v. Winter, 25 S.W.3d 382, 383–84 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, no pet.).

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 8, 2010
w OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

J ; 

. 

Z”E - 

AUSTIN 

536 i 

I I 

, 

i 

i, 

! 

t 

i. 

i; 

/ 

.: 

:. 

. 

.I 

$ 

4, 
i 

‘ 

537 

Boa. wr 0. Euu, Jr., pge 8 
538 

Bon. v* p* xaru, Jr,, pago I 

- - 
l 8.0, 6. 88 codas 8016 to? tOI U&U 

dOUU $8 8U8h 8plit 8hUl bo 8Old tO th8 0-Q &88&d 

pro uty, 4irrttl 

P I 

or ladlroatl~, or k cryon had116 

8a ntaort th8rr a# or to l 4 

Udt -hiOh 18 a buw t0 the P 

uW 0th~ thu l t8riag 

8tl t, fob 1888 t&U th0 

UUnt Of the ad&d&86 +&I. 8fOro8d of 8d1 pro 

or the O-O&o 8munt of the todgmt8 y&m% ii 

at7 

8 l 

ft..& @ Oi the i8t ,pSati488 in 8blb88aWO 

if 8t th8 tU 8a10 ttW FrOpUw 18 boo@ in b 

that La a putr.to thti l it, it ahall k hoU L 

&%8X&# 

far all tuln&unitr tiAja6&tohw# llaarwtluoame: bhat 

th. ~O~rt 

&OU thU t i 

l mOt b. 8Ub80QUOat~ 8011 by euo& -8kO tW 

0 d4UdgOd W&&O WithOUt th0 OOlUUt Of O&& tAXiJl6 

Uitr; Ud th$. th@ ~WOO0848 Of a4 8U.h 8ti 8hd1 bo wntcr( 

-96 8u.h Mit8 la pOp8rtiOS to tho& ilLtU88t0, Xt a8O 

provider fbr l lo br tho rhrrltt lf thr tmubu der8 not 8011 

8-O withi 81X mOnthI v th8 i=iPdirs ti thg rO68@1- 

palob 

. 
540 

Iron. u. P, xwu, J?., pago 8 

dlaiu for 8d TUorr tuoqt rb8ll asvw bo Unrtrud 

t0 i>Ohld@ U8088&+&8 fO? MinteMn80 U& Omt%Oa 

jB8.# OB l p?. rCk ga UP0 h818 yldI8t lrrlebla 

M&8 8uthwlad br law to b8 mado br uatu improramont 

&i8triOt, Ot -tW OosltrOl Ad 

&a(, M jtti-t iOrWlOrb6 8d8h 1 

OTWIIt di8t?iOt8, 

On8 Md 0181n8 fOr 

@d VtiOrU kX88 8h*l1 l W ?OjUd18. - OOtieOtiO8 

Of S8ia U808tiat8 OF tb8 1 P Ok8 8*O\rriE6 8UO.O 

aootlon ia of rha 88id Aot protiha that 

usa A08 8h4 b0 OU8UhtiT8 Of U# ia UtditiOIt t0 ui Othu 

ridIt 8nd rWiiO8 WtliO& w bX* W&it MJ 60 8lltitl8d t4 

UdU Wi8ti.86 h1. 
1 

54s . 

Tour my truly
**Exhibit 99.6**

 

Certificationof CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

I certify that this periodicreport containing the issuer’s financial statements fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained In this periodicreport fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the issuer.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ John F Coger                                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | John F Coger                                       |
|   |   | Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | March 18, 2003                                     |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

AMO Enterprises, Inc.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Ramon Perez 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00002-CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DCV0855)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s second motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until March 10, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Alan N. Magenheim, attorney for Appellant’s, 

prepare the brief for Appellant’s and forward the same to this Court on or before March 10, 

2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of February, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1679

AN ACT

To provide that the great hall of the Capitol Visitor Center 

shall be known as Emancipation Hall.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1679 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GREAT HALL OF THE CAP2 ITOL VISITOR CENTER AS EMANCIPATION 

3 HALL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The great hall of the Capitol Vis5 itor Center shall be known and designated as ‘‘Emanci6 pation Hall’’, and any reference to the great hall in any 

7 law, rule, or regulation shall be deemed to be a reference 

8 to Emancipation Hall. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply on 

10 and after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate November 15, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1679

AN ACT

To provide that the great hall of the Capitol Visitor 

Center shall be known as Emancipation Hall.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10.124


As of March 23, 2000                        Via personal delivery

Cami Winikoff
C/o Trimark Pictures, Inc.

Dear Cami:

     This letter (the "Amendment") shall amend the terms of your employment
agreement (the "Agreement") with Trimark Pictures, Inc. ("Trimark") dated as of
February 1, 1999.

     1. Paragraph 1 shall be deemed deleted and the following paragraph shall be
inserted in its place:

          1.   TERM: January 13, 2000 through January 13, 2003 (the "Term").

     2. Paragraph 2 shall be deemed deleted and the following paragraph shall be
inserted in its place:

          2.   TITLE: Chief Operating Officer

     3. SIGNING BONUS: Upon your signature of this Amendment, Trimark shall pay
you the sum of $32,000.00.

     The agreement, as amended hereby shall continue in full force and effect.


Sincerely,                                  AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:




\s\   Mark Amin                             \s\   Cami Winikoff
-------------------------                   ----------------------------
Mark Amin                                   Cami Winikoff        Date
President


                                       1
#### EPSTEIN v. EPSTEIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY D. BERRYMAN,

THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD, and

THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT, and her

successors, a corporation sole,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Nancy Berryman’s (“Berryman”)

Renewed and Extended Objection to, and Request to the Court to Deny United

States’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman Per

Magistrate Judge’s Granted Extension of Time Until or Before January 6th, 2014 [#95]

(the “Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion, the Court finds that it is intended by Defendant

Berryman, who proceeds as a pro se litigant in this matter, to be her Response to Plaintiff’s

Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#95] is DENIED as moot. The Court

accepts the Motion as Defendant Berryman’s Response to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for

Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman. Plaintiff shall timely file a Reply to the

Response.

Dated: January 8, 2014

Case 1:11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM Document 97 Filed 01/08/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSEL YN M I LAGROS GO M EZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71801 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 216- 701

ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose l yn M i l agros G om ez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her appe a l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng he rappl i c a t i on f or vo l un t ary departure. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED JAN 25 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71801 2 d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 3 2 4 F .3 d1 1 0 5 , 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e r e j e c tG om e z ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A vi ol a t e d due pr oc e s s byf a i l i ng t o a ddr e s s he rf

e arof f or c e d gang r e c rui tm e ntbe c aus e s he ne ve rappl i e d f or a s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, o rr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e . Se e La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr ort o pr e va i l on adu e p r o c e s s c la im ) . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew G om ez ’ s c on t ent i on s bas ed on the IJ ’ s f ai l ure t o ad v i se h er reg ard i n g p o ssi b l e el i g i b i l i ty fo r asyl u m b ecau se sh e d i dn o tex h au st th e is s u e b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 7-78 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02509-RBJ

JANE KOEWING,

Plaintiff,

v.

CH2M HILL, Inc.,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A702, 7th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on August 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 

A Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference is set for August 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.

Counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to 

address: jury instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, 

stipulations as to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

Case 1:11-cv-02509-RBJ Document 19 Filed 12/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 1

st day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02509-RBJ Document 19 Filed 12/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### BALAS v. BURGNER MOLASSES CO., Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

*Dismissed*without opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). A meeting of the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERPD), Scientific Advisory Board will be held on October 28-30, 2008. The topic of the meeting is to review new start and continuing research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board. 

# DATES:

Tuesday, October 28, 2008 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 29, 2008 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Thursday, October 30, 2008 from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

SERDP Office Conference Center, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 804,  Arlington, VA 22203. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Jonathan Bunger, SERDP Office, 901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 696-2126. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E8-24392 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K      filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the      Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2002-1 Trust and any distribution      reports filed in respect of the Trust during the 2007 calendar      year; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under      which such statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the      period covered by the annualreport; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The      distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the      depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these      reports is included in such reports;and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under      the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee      has fulfilled its obligations under the trust  agreement. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02662-WJM-KLM

SCOTT SHUMAN,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DELTA OUTSOURCE GROUP, INC., a Missouri corporation,

 Defendant.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW the parties by and through their undersigned counsel of record and 

for their Notice of Settlement, hereby state:

1. The Plaintiff and the Defendant have reached a settlement.

2. The settlement document has been executed by the parties.

3. The parties will be filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice with each party to 

pay his or its own attorney’s fees and costs once the settlement terms have been 

completed. The parties expect this to happen by December 2, 2011.

Dated: November 14, 2011.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/ David M. Larson s/ Steven J. Wienczkowski

___________________________ _______________________

David M. Larson, Esq. Steven J. Wienczkowski, Esq.

405 S. Cascade Avenue, Suite 305 Adam L. Plotkin, PC

Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903 621 17th Avenue, Suite 1800

(719) 473-0006 Denver, CO 80293

Attorney for the Plaintiff (303) 382-0528

Attorney for the Defendant

Case 1:11-cv-02662-WJM-KLM Document 6 Filed 11/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Minerals Management Service by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period November 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009. The 
List of Restricted Joint Bidders published in the Federal Register 
April 22, 2008, and the correction published in the Federal Register on 
June 27, 2008, covered the period May 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008.

Group I

Exxon Mobil Corporation
ExxonMobil Exploration Company

Group II

Shell Oil Company
Shell Offshore Inc
SWEPI LP
Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
Shell Consolidated Energy Resources Inc.
Shell Land & Energy Company
Shell Onshore Ventures Inc.
Shell Offshore Properties and Capital II, Inc.
Shell Rocky Mountain Production LLC
Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group III

BP America Production Company
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Group IV

TOTAL E&P USA, Inc.

Group V

Chevron Corporation
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.
Unocal Corporation
Union Oil Company of California
Pure Partners, L.P.

 Group VI

ConocoPhillips Company
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
ConocoPhillips Petroleum Company
Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.
The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company
Inexeco Oil Company

Group VII

Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.
Eni Petroleum US LLC
Eni Oil US LLC
Eni Marketing Inc.
Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
Eni US Operating Co. Inc.
Eni BB Pipeline LLC

Group VIII

Petrobras America Inc.

Group IX

StatoilHydro ASA
Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC
StatoilHydro USA E&P, Inc.
StatoilHydro Gulf Properties Inc.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Randall B. Luthi,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E8-23976 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Wehave issued our report dated November 21, 2007, accompanying the financialstatements of Ciprico Inc. which is included in their Annual Report (whichreport expensed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraphrelating to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123(R),*Shares Based Payments,* effective October 1,2006) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007.  We hereby consent to the inclusion of saidreport in the Registration Statement of Ciprico Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-64999,File No. 33-65001, File No. 333-02931, File No. 333-02933, File No. 333-42841,File No. 333-42843, File No. 333-42845 and File No. 333-61018).

 

/s/ G RANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 21, 2007

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy Gottfried, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Inktomi Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Inktomi Corporation.

Dated: February 14, 2003                 By: /s/ RANDY GOTTFRIED
                                            -----------------------------------
                                             Randy Gottfried