alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37219

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

DONALD ALLEN GRUNDVIG

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 531

Filed: June 28, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, S tate of Idaho, Twin

Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of one a nd one

- half years , for possession of methamphetamine

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Flem ing, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GUTIERREZ, Judge

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Donald Allen Grundvig was convicted of possession of met hamphetamine , Idaho Code

§ 37

- 2732(c)(1). The district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum

period of confinement of one and one

- half years

. Grundvig appeals, contending that the sentence

is excessi ve.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Grundvig ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE,
CONTACT:

Christopher M. Salyer
Chairman, CEO
CD Warehouse, Inc.
(405) 949-2422

      CD Warehouse Announces Resignation of Senior Vice President and CFO

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK - September 1, 2000 - CD Warehouse, Inc. (NASDAQ :CDWI)
Christopher M. Salyer, Chairman and CEO of CD Warehouse, Inc. announced today
that Doyle E. Motley, resigned his position as the Company's Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Salyer will assume CFO
responsibilities until Mr. Motley's successor is named.

"Mr. Motley has been with CD Warehouse, Inc. since its beginning in I996. During
his time at CD Warehouse, the Company completed a private placement offering and
raised capital through an Initial Public Offering in 1997. He has played a
pivotal role in the growth and expansion of the Company, building it into the
largest retailer of pre-owned CDs," Salyer said.

CD Warehouse, Inc. franchises and operates retail music stores in 38 states, the
District of Columbia, England, France, Guatemala, Canada and Venezuela under the
name "CD Warehouse, disc go round, CD Exchange and Music Trader." CD Warehouse
stores buy, sell and trade pre-owned CDs, DVDs and Games with their customers.
CD Warehouse stores sell a full complement of new release CDs and operates its
website under the name of cdwarehouse.com. Company information is available at
www.cdwi.com.

Statements made in this press release, other than those concerning historical
information, should be considered forward-looking and subject to various risks
and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based on
management's belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently
available to, management pursuant to the "safe harbor' provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results may
differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of a variety of factors, including those contained in the
Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**Exhibit 13.2**     Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to    Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     I, Steven Spooner, Vice President Finance and Chief Financial    Officer of Mitel Networks Corporation (“Mitel”),    certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as    adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act    of 2002, that:      (1)     the Annual Report on    Form 20-F/A    of Mitel, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007, filed    with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the    date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and      (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Mitel. /s/  Steven    Spooner    Name:     Steven Spooner     Title:     Chief Financial Officer     Date: November 21, 2007
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 5, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0903

Lower Tribunal No. F20-14617

________________

Seymour Quiles,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, 

Judge.

Seymour Quiles, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### William L. ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. E. C. BOOZER, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 23, 1936.

C. H. Landefeld, Jr., of Plollywood, for plaintiffs in error.

Boozer & Boozer, of West Palm Beach, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the cases of Treat et al. v. State ex rel., 118 Fla. 899, 160 So. 498; State ex rel. v. Sholtz et al., 119 Fla. 701, 704, 160 So. 872; and City of Bradenton v. State, 117 Fla. 578, 579, 158 So. 165.

It is so ordered. Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

DAVIS, Justice

(concurring).

A party may become bound by a judicial proceeding because he is a party by representation, that is, because his contractual or legal relationship to the nominal parties of record may be ‘ such that whatever binds them will bind him ex proprio rigore. State v. Rose (Fla.) 165 So. 60. Successors in office to officials bound by a peremptory writ of mandamus may, on like principles, become bound by an adjudication against their predecessors in office. So it is not necessary to reopen- the • case merely to make a substitution of respondents as such successors in office where predecessors were bound.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 19, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.105 State and Local Governments, Excluding Employee Retirement Funds1** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











I, Glen R. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of CVD Equipment Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 of CVD Equipment Corporation (the “Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CVD Equipment Corporation.





Dated: August 16, 2010





/s/   Glen R. CharlesGlen R. CharlesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 21

- 2125

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Dale Roberson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of Nebraska - Lincoln 1

____________

Submitted: November 4, 2021 Filed : November 18, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Dale Roberson received a 180

- month prison sentence after he plead ed guilty to conspi r ing to distribute methamphetamine

. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.-2- 841(b)(1)(A), 846. As part of the plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his
conviction and sentence

, except for, as relevant here, ineffective assistance of
counsel. I n an Anders brief

, Roberson ’s counsel suggests that the sentence is
substantive ly unreasonable. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A pro se supplemental brief alleges that counsel was ineffective

.

The appeal waiver, which is enforceable, covers the sentencing issue

. See
United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of an appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889

– 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). And we decline to consider the ineffective

- assistance

- of

counsel claim on direct appeal

. See United States v. Ramirez

- Hernandez , 449 F.3d 824, 826

– 27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually best litigated in collateral proceedings”).

Finally, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that no
other non

- frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, grant counsel permission to withdraw, and deny the pending pro se motion as moot.

______________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02584-MSK-CBS

KEVIN STRINGER;

RYAN O’NEILL;

JOQUIN MARTINEZ;

CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON; and

WILLIAM LEGER, III, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02584-RPM Document 3 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02584-RPM Document 3 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02570-MSK-KLM

MARY OZNOFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

MERCK SHARP & DOEHME CORP.,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02570-WYD-KLM Document 6 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

Series 2007-1, Class A Notes; Series 2007-1, Class B Notes

 

I, Mike A. Reeves, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Private Label Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2006 amending and restating in full the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2001 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Funding (USA) Inc. V, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from February 14, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 3rd day of March 2008.

 

HSBC Private Label Corporation

 

 

By: /s/ Mike A. Reeves

Name:  Mike A. Reeves

Title:  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belrose Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Annual Report of the Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                     
|   



|Date: June 27, 2007
|-------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette
Andrew C. Frenette
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1704 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1704

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First Higher Education Extension Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 
2007'' and inserting ``July 31, 2007''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.

            Passed the Senate June 27, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1704

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                     1965, and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>       SEP-30-1997

<CASH>                          24,766,023 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,320,429 
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                27,086,452 
<PP&E>                         101,118,834 
<DEPRECIATION>                        0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 143,029,651 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,345,884 
<BONDS>                         63,255,159 
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                      59,385,720 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   143,029,651 
<SALES>                         19,086,511 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                19,993,399 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    8,366,331 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   558,904 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               4,641,263 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  6,426,901 
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              5,180,295 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    393,705 
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                     5,574,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        28.21 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        28.21 

        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31(a)**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John E. Duffy, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of HickoryTech;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 3, 2004 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      |
| /s/ John E.  Duffy        |   |
| John E.  Duffy            |
| Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

 

1

----