alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5241-N-01]


Notice of Availability of Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle 
Acquisition Report

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration, HUD.

ACTION: Notice of availability of report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD is announcing the availability on its 
website of HUD's Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle Acquisition Report for 
Fiscal Year 2007, which was prepared in accordance with the Energy 
Policy Act of 1992.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bradley S. Jewitt, Director, 
Facilities Management Division, Office of Administrative and Management 
Services, Office of Administration, Department of Housing and Urban 
Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410-3000; telephone 
number 202-402-7384 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing- or 
speech-impaired individuals may access the voice telephone number 
listed above by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service 
during working hours at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Energy Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 13201 et 
seq.) (the Act) establishes a comprehensive plan to achieve economic, 
energy and environmental benefits by promoting the use of alternative 
fuels. A major goal of the Act is to have the federal government 
exercise leadership in the use of alternative fuel vehicles. To that 
end, the Act established alternative fuel vehicle purchasing 
requirements for the federal fleets of government agencies, and 
requires federal agencies to report on their compliance with the 
requirements of the Act. A copy of HUD's Fleet Alternative Fuel Vehicle 
Report can be obtained via the World Wide Web at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/reports/admreports.cfm.

    Dated: September 10, 2008.
Keith A. Nelson,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-24372 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael A. Gerlich, Chief Financial Officer of Gastar Exploration, Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for 12 months ended December 31,
2009 (the Report), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 fully complies with the requirements of that section.

I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 25, 2010



/s/ MICHAEL A. GERLICHMichael A. GerlichChief Financial Officer
#### CITY OF MIAMI v. HAMILTON.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. consolidated statement of income for the year
ended December 31, 1998 and consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000719271
<NAME> TRANSFINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26888
<ALLOWANCES>                                       953
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 34140
<PP&E>                                           57280
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   77763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            15122
<BONDS>                                           9700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                       50998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     77763
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                151701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   154722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (839)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.39)
        

</TABLE>
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NANCY D. BERRYMAN,

THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD, and

THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT, and her

successors, a corporation sole,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Nancy D. Berryman’s (“Berryman”)

Motion to Strike All of Plaintiff’s Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 12(f) Nunc Pro Tunc and Motion to Set for Hearing of Motion to

Strike [Docket No. 73; Filed May 22, 2013] (the “Motion”). On May 20, 2013, Defendant

Berryman filed an identical motion, which the Court denied on May 21, 2013. See Motion

to Strike [#69]; Minute Order [#71]. Unlike the original Motion to Strike, however, the

present Motion includes a separate Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Strike All

Plaintiff’s Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12(f) Nunc Pro

Tunc, and Motion to Set for Hearing of Motion to Strike [#75] (the “Memorandum”). In light

of the Memorandum, which appears to have been inadvertently not filed with the original

Motion to Strike, the Court reexamines the merits of Defendant Berryman’s request.

As before, Defendant Berryman appears to ask the Court to strike the Complaint [#1;

Filed October 18, 2011] because it “contains no Affidavit and Complaint by a competent

fact witness attesting facts that would commence an action against Alleged Defendants

NANCY D. BERRYMAN, Et al.” [sic] Motion [#73] at 2. Defendant Berryman further argues

that “[t]he Sham Pleading contain[s] no allegations within its four corners which could be

construed to be admissible evidence in an action, pursuant to the Federal Rules of

Evidence.” Id.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), “[a] pleading that states a claim for relief,” such as

Case 1:11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM Document 76 Filed 06/04/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

the Complaint in this action, “must contain: (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds

for the court’s jurisdiction . . . , (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought . . . .” There is no

requirement that an affidavit or other admissible evidence be included in a complaint.

Further, regarding the remaining arguments set forth in the Memorandum, the Court

notes that Defendant Berryman has raised, and the Court has addressed, these arguments

before in this lawsuit. See, e.g., Recommendation [#66] at 29-33. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#73] is DENIED.

Dated: June 4, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM Document 76 Filed 06/04/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1894
LAVERNE SWEENEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RECREATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, a Maryland Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-158-WMN) Submitted: November 30, 2004 Decided: December 22, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. LaVerne Sweeney, Appellant Pro Se. Barrett W. Freedlander, SAUL EWING, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: LaVerne Sweeney appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sweeney v. Recreational Indus., Inc. , No. CA-02-158-WMN (D. Md. June 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Efficient Networks, Inc.

     We consent to the use of our reports on the consolidated financial
statements of Efficient Networks, Inc. incorporated by reference herein, which
reports appear in the Efficient Networks, Inc. Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-94289) declared effective by the Commission on
February 2, 2000.

                                             KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
September 15, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02391-RPM-KMT

MARVIN J. THOMAS,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Operated in Colorado as a district of public schools organized pursuant

to C.R.S.23-14-101, 

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR WHICH TO

OPPOSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

_____________________________________________________________________________

The court having reviewed the Unopposed Motion of Time for Which to Oppose Summary

Judgment of Plaintiff Marvin Thomas and having reviewed the premises orders that said motion shall be

granted; Plaintiff shall file his Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment on or before

October 1, 2012.

Dated: August 31st , 2012

By the Court: 

s/ Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________ 

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02391-RPM-KMT Document 18 Filed 08/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB

OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company; 

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut Insurance

Company; 

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance

company; 

ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance company;

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut insurance

company; 

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey insurance company; and

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a New

Jersey insurance company,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal With

Prejudice (Doc 316 - filed May 5, 2014), and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

it is therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to

pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

DATED: May 6, 2014

Case 1:11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB Document 317 Filed 05/06/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of EAU Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian D. Heinhold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





DATE: March 30, 2011





/s/ Brian D. HeinholdBrian D. HeinholdChief Financial OfficerEAU Technologies, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00391-LTB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL CANTER, 

Defendant.

ORDER

PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Sentencing hearing held before the

Honorable Lewis T. Babcock, United States District Judge, on September 6, 2012, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Defendant Daniel Canter is sentenced to TIME SERVED.

Dated: September 6, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cr-00391-LTB Document 43 Filed 09/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
205 La. 648

#### STATE v. DOUCET.

Nos. 37366, 37369.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1944.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1944.

*908Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., Niels F. Hertz, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Seth Lewis, Dist. Atty., of Opelousas, for_ appellant.

Edward Rightor, Clarence Dowling, and Warren O. Coleman, all of New Orleans, for Phillip A. Gehlbach and amici curiae.

S. Allen Bordelon, of Marksville, and Lessley P. Gardiner, of Opelousas, for appellee.

HAMITER, Justice.

The appeals of the State of Louisiana in these cases present a question of law identical with one considered by us in State v. Gehlbach, 17 So.2d 349 on the docket of this court, a rehearing in which is this day refused. It is whether or not a bill of information or indictment properly negatives the running of prescription by using the language “yet more than one year has not elapsed since the commission of the aforesaid offenses was made known to the judge, district attorney, * * * ” instead of alleging in the language of the statute (Article 8, Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure) that the indictment or information was found or filed within one year after the offenses were made known to the judge, district attorney, et cetera.

The question was answered affirmatively in the Gehlbach case; and for the reasons therein stated it is similarly determined here.

Therefore, the rulings of the trial judge sustaining the pleas of prescription and dismissing the prosecutions are annulled and set aside; the pleas of prescription are now overruled; and both cases are remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

HIGGINS, J., dissents for reasons assigned by him in State v. Gehlbach, 17 So. 2d 349.

FOURNET, J., dissents, see dissenting opinion State v. Gehlbach, La.Sup., 17 So. 2d 349.

PONDER, J., dissents.
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: September 17, 2007Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Z.1 Release                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Complete file      PDF (656 KB)


Summary statistics and table of contents      PDF (87 KB) | CSV (9 KB)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables      PDF (12 KB) | CSV (6 KB)
Flows tables      PDF (182 KB) | CSV (123 KB)
Level tables      PDF (150 KB) | CSV (107 KB)
Balance sheet tables      PDF(24 KB) | CSV (13 KB)
Supplementary tables      PDF (36 KB) | CSV (23 KB)These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web SiteRelease dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)


Statistical releasesHome |
Economic research and dataAccessibility | 
Contact Us
Last update: September 17, 2007
|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 22

- 13408
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
NORMA MARTIN,
Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Appellant,

versus E.C. PUBLICATIONS INC., WARNER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, d.b.a. DC Comics

Defendants

- Counter Claimants

- Appellees,

DC COMICS, Inc., USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 22

- 13408

Defendant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:19

- cv

- 21167

- DPG

____________________ Before J ORDAN , J ILL P RYOR , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM:We issued a jurisdictional question asking whether the district court has entered a final, appealable order, and, particularly, whether Appellees’ counterclaims have been resolved

. In response, Appellees request that we remand this appeal to the district court for a ruling on their pending motion to dismiss the counterclaims. Appellant Norma Martin opposes the motion. We conclude that t he district court has not entered a final or appealable order, so this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and Appellees’ motion to remand is DENIED as MOOT. Martin appeals the district court’s September 27, 2022 order entering summary judgment to Appellees on all of her claims. However, the district court’s order did not address Appellees’ counterclaims, and our review of the record does not reveal any other order disposing of them. Further , the district court did not certify its September 27, 2 022 order for immediate review under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Accordingly , the district USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 2 of 322

- 13408 Opinion of the Court 3
court’s order is not final or immediately appealable , and we lack jurisdiction to review it

. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. Sargeant , 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).

Because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we decline to entertain Appellees’ motion to remand. See Vachon v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co. , 20 F.4th 1343, 1347 (11th Cir. 2021) (stating that when we lack j urisdiction, “we may do no more than ‘ announc [ e ] the fact and dismiss [] the cause ’ ” ( quoting United States v. Amodeo , 916 F.3d 967, 971 (11th Cir. 2019)))

. USCA11 Case: 22-13408 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 11/03/2023 Page: 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW

BRIAN M. GROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM CLEMENTS, 

JOHN DAVIS,

ELLEN BLACKMORE,

MARY CARTER, 

THOMAS FISHER,

MARY BETH KALYMER,

KERRY BARONI,

MARCIA MORTIN (aka DENIES MORTIN),

ARISTEDES ZAVARES,

STEVE M. VICALVI,

P. LASTRELL,

JOHN DOE,

JANE DOE, and

ANTHONY DECESARO,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion to Compell [sic] Production of

Medical, Dental and Mental Health Records (Docket No. 29) is denied without prejudice

as premature.

Date: March 7, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02656-MSK-MJW Document 38 Filed 03/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1