1

 Although this document suggests that Plaintiff submitted a “Sealed Motion on Compact

Disc,” the court did not receive any such CD on May 8, 2012. Indeed, upon review of the docket,

it appears that Plaintiff neglected to bring the compact disc to the court for filing on May 8, 2012

(see Doc. No. 41) and instead conventionally submitted it the following day (see Doc. No. 46). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02696–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BLACK AND MCDONALD/CUSTOM LIGHTING SERVICES, 

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the court on a number of materials that Plaintiff has conventionally

submitted in this case. Specifically, on April 16, 2012, Plaintiff filed her “Response to Order to

Show Cause” (Doc. No. 31, filed Apr. 16, 2012), which includes two conventional submissions

entitled “Conventional Submission – Exhibit #1 Hubbard Digest” (Doc. No. 32) and “Sealed and

Confidential Submission #2 – Testimony and Affidavit” (Doc. No. 33). Additionally, on May 8,

2012, Plaintiff submitted her first “Motion Seeking Leave to File Sealed Documents” (Doc. No.

41), which includes a “Conventional Submission of a Sealed Motion on Compact Disc” (Doc.

No. 41-1).1

 Finally, on May 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed a “Conventional Submission of a Sealed

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
2

Motion on Compact Disc” (Doc. No. 46), which appears to be related to her second “Motion

Seeking Leave to Filed Sealed Document - Level #3. (Doc. No. 45, filed May 9, 2012). 

Plaintiff has registered as a participant in the court’s Electronic Case Filing System

(ECF) pursuant to D.C.COLO. ECF Procedures (Civil) 3.2B. Pursuant to D.C.COLO. ECF

Procedures (Civil) 1.1A, “all documents filed in civil cases shall be filed electronically in a

portable document format (PDF) using the [ECF] system.” The only applicable exception to this

requirement is for “[m]aterials that cannot be converted to electronic form (e.g. videotape,

audiotape, etc.), which instead must “be filed by delivering them directly to the clerks’s office

and following Section 5.8 of these procedures. Id. at 1.2A (emphasis added). The court has

reviewed the compact discs submitted conventionally by Plaintiff and finds that each of the

electronic documents contained therein could have been filed electronically in PDF format. 

Thus, Plaintiff was required to submit these documents via ECF and was not permitted to file

them conventionally. 

Additionally, Plaintiff’s conventional submission of these materials further violates ECF

Procedures (Civil) 5.8F.3, which provides as follows: 

The filer [of conventionally submitted materials] must serve the conventionally

submitted materials on all other parties. The Notices of Electronic Filing

generated by the electronic filing of the cover page and by the court’s text -only

entry noting receipt of the materials shall not constitute service.

On April 20, 2012, Defendant filed a “Notice of Plaintiff’s Failure to Serve Exhibits with

Response to Order to Show Cause” indicating that it was not served with the conventionally

submitted materials attached to Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause. (See Doc. No. 34.) 

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
2

 The court will not permit Plaintiff to re-file her either of her “Conventional

Submission[s] of a Sealed Motion on Compact Disc” (Doc. Nos 41-1 & 46). Each of those

conventionally submitted motions seeks to restrict access to Plaintiff’s “Sealed and Confidential

Submission #2 – Testimony and Affidavit” (Doc. No. 31-2). Because this Order strikes the

document that Plaintiff’s conventionally submitted motions seek to restrict, those motions are

now moot.

3

Similarly, on May 8, 2012, Defendant filed a “Notice of Plaintiff’s Failure to Serve Exhibits with

her ‘Motion Seeking Leave to File Sealed Documents’” indicating that Plaintiff failed to serve

Plaintiff with a copy of the conventionally submitted compact disc attached to her first “Motion

Seeking Leave to File Sealed Documents.” (See Doc. No. 49.) Finally, Plaintiff’s Second

“Conventional Submission of a Sealed Motion on Compact Disc” (Doc. No. 46) does not include

a certificate of service indicating that the conventionally submitted compact disc was served on

Defendant. 

Accordingly, the court finds that each of Plaintiff’s conventional submissions are

properly stricken for failure to comply with D.COLO. ECF Procedures (Civil) 1.1 and 5.8F.3. 

Nevertheless, as to the conventionally submitted materials attached to Plaintiff’s Response to

Order to Show Cause, given the implications that the Order to Show Cause may have on

Plaintiff’s case, the finds it proper to permit Plaintiff an opportunity to properly re-file these

materials.2

 Accordingly, the court will grant Plaintiff a brief extension of time to resubmit these

materials. Plaintiff is advised that her future filings must comply with the court’s Local Rules,

including the District of Colorado Civil ECF Procedures, as well the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedures. Failure to comply with these rules will result in an additional Order to Show Cause

being entered against her. 

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
4

Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, it is 

ORDERED that the following Conventionally Submitted Materials are STRICKEN:

1. Plaintiff’s “Conventional Submission – Exhibit #1 Hubbard Digest” (Doc.

No. 32);

2. Plaintiff’s “Sealed and Confidential Submission #2 – Testimony and

Affidavit” (Doc. No. 33); 

3. “Conventional Submission of a Sealed Motion on Compact Disc” (Doc.

No. 41-1); and 

4. Plaintiff’s “Conventional Submission of a Sealed Motion on Compact

Disc” (Doc. No. 46).

It is further 

ORDERED that Plaintiff may properly re-file the conventionally submitted materials

attached to her Response to Order to Show Cause no later than May 21, 2012.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2012.

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 53 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4