alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofLancer Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Freitas, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 12, 2004 | /s/ MARK L. FREITAS     |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Mark L. Freitas,        |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Petition of George RICE and Progressive Miners of America, et al., for a Writ of Prohibition. George RICE et al., Petitioners, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS et al., Respondents.

No. 6409.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Oct. 16, 1937.

George W. Dowell, of Du Quoin, 111., for petitioners.

Ralph F. Lesemann, of East St. Louis, 111., for respondents.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and MAJOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A petition having been filed by George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al. for a writ of prohibition to restrain The District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Illinois and Hon. Fred L. Wham, Judge of said District Court, from enforcing the order of said, court entered on October 18, 1937, and from entering any order in cause No. Equity 4655, United Electric Company, Plaintiff, v. George Rice and Progressive Miners of America et al., Defendants, and counsel for respondents to said petition having filed suggestions in opposition thereto, it is ordered by the court that the relief sought in said petition for a writ of prohibition be, and it -is hereby, denied, and that the said petition be, and it is hereby, dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   report  of  Energroup   Technologies
Corp.,(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the  quarterly  period ended March 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,
(the  "Report"),  I(We),  Stephen R. Fry,  President  and Director and Thomas J.
Howells,  Secretary and Director, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By/S/Stephen Fry
-------------------------------
Stephen R. Fry
President and Director
Dated this 12th day of May, 2005.



By/S/Thomas Howells
-----------------------
Thomas J. Howells
Secretary and Director
Dated this 12th day of May, 2005.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-049-CV

DRS. ALIMADAD JATOI AND 					      APPELLANTS

ALCINA JATOI	

	V.

WM FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 						APPELLEES

AND RICHARD L. GOINS	

	------------

	FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Doctors Alimadad Jatoi and Alcina Jatoi are attempting to appeal the trial court’s order confirming an arbitration award for WM Financial Services, Inc. and Richard L. Goins.  The trial court signed its order on October 24, 2005, and appellants filed a motion for new trial on November 23, 2005; therefore, their notice of appeal was due January 23, 2006.2  Appellants did not file their notice of appeal until February 13, 2006.  Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.3

	We informed appellants by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over their appeal.  In their response, appellants contend that their appeal is timely because they filed their notice of appeal within thirty days of January 13, 2006, the date the trial court overruled their motion for new trial.  But a motion for new trial does not extend the deadline for filing a notice of appeal unless the trial court modifies, corrects, or reforms its judgment as a result of the motion.4 In this case, the trial court did not modify, correct, or reform its order, but simply denied appellants’ motion for new trial.  Accordingly, appellants’ filing of their notice of appeal on February 13 did not vest this court with jurisdiction over their appeal.5  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.6

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED:  March 23, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02696–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

BLACK AND MCDONALD/CUSTOM LIGHTING SERVICES, 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Clarify the Term ‘Press of Business’ and Motion for an Extension of Two

Weeks” (Doc. No. 73, filed July 2, 2012) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s

Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks to have the court clarify the term “press of business.” 

The court cannot act as an advocate for a pro se party or issue advisory opinions as to the

interpretation or import of the rules and standards governing practice in federal court. 

Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED in part to the extent that it seeks an extension of time to

respond to “Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause.” (Doc. No.

63, filed June 13, 2012.) Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendant’s Response no later than July

19, 2012. 

Dated: July 12, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02696-REB-KMT Document 77 Filed 07/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### POLK CITY SECURITIES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. TOWN OF POLK CITY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Bradford G. Williams, of Lakeland, for the motion.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of counsel for appellant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6127

MACK NEIL MYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS E. ATKINS, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-1893-10-20BD)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mack Neil Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS &

MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), complaint. Appellant's case was referred to

a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file specific, timely objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court

order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant filed only a general objection which merely stated that

Appellee failed to respond to Appellant's discovery requests. This

general objection is insufficient to preserve appellate review of

Appellant's claims. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985);

Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982).

Specific objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation are necessary in order to focus the court's attention

on disputed issues, Thomas, 474 U.S. at 147-48, and to preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the

parties have been warned that failure to specifically object will

waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46

(4th Cir. 1985). Appellant waived appellate review by failing to

raise specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1
                                  ------------






TANNER LC
215 South State Street, Suite 800
Salt Lake City, Utah  84111
Telephone (801) 532-7444
Fax (801) 532-4911
www.tannerco.com




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent  registered  public  accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.
033-53524,  as amended, and 333-69057) and in the related  Prospectuses,  of our
report  dated  September  27,  2006  related  to  the  financial  statements  of
Dynatronics  Corporation  included in its Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.







/s/ TANNER LC






Salt Lake City, Utah
September 28, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. HILARIO QUINTERO-RODRIGUEZ,

 a/k/a “The Big Guy,”, a/k/a “Santa Claus,”

2. ABEL LAST NAME UNKNOWN (LNU),

3. OCTAVIO QUEZADA-PEREZ,

 a/k/a “Tavi,”

4. FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS,

5. GUADALUPE RUIZ-GUARDADO,

 a/k/a “Lupe,”

6. JULIO MARES-RUIZ,

 a/k/a “Mariano,”

7. LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVA, and

8. ROBERT MASON BYAS,

 a/k/a “Robin,”

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#178) on February 16, 2012, by Defendant Octavio Quezada-Perez. The Court construes this

Notice as a motion to change his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’

plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 185 Filed 02/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for April 6, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. and a Sentencing

hearing is set for August 6, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the United States District

Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The suppression hearing set for March 2, 2012, the final trial preparation

conference set for May 24, 2012, and the May 29, 2012, trial date are

VACATED.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 185 Filed 02/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Don C. WILLIAMS and Ursel Williams, Husband and Wife, and Reden Reche Williams, Jr., Appellants, v. COUNTY JUDGE’S COURT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Florida, In Probate, and Mamie Hewing, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Nov. 12, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 8-K      filed by U.S. Bank Trust National Association, solely as Trustee for the      Trust Certificates (TRUCs) Series 2002-1 Trust and any distribution      reports filed in respect of the Trust during the 2008 calendar      year; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information in those reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under      which such statements were made, no misleading as of the last day of the      period covered by the annualreport; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | The      distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the      depositor by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these      reports is included in such reports;and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee under      the trust agreement and except as disclosed in these reports, the Trustee      has fulfilled its obligations under the trust  agreement. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: CONDEMNATION BY SUNOCO 

PIPELINE L.P. OF PERMANENT AND 

TEMPORARY RIGHTS OF WAY FOR 

THE TRANSPORTATION OF ETHANE, 

PROPANE, LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS 

AND OTHER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 

IN THE TOWNSHIP OF HEIDELBERG, 

LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, 

OVER THE LANDS OF HOMES FOR 

AMERICA, INC.

PETITION OF: HOMES FOR AMERICA, 

INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 429 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02307-WYD-KMT

JULIO ALVAREZ-CORTEZ;

LORENZA MORALES-ALVAREZ, individually and as next friend of H G-T, a minor and

V G-T, a minor; and

EMMANUEL RUIZ,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LOU VALLARIO, Garfield County Sheriff, in his individual capacity;

DOES 1-3, Garfield County deputy sheriffs, in their individual capacities;

STEVE TURZA, an ICE agent, in his individual capacity; and

CHRIS CARTER, an ICE agent, in his individual capacity,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Based on the filing of the First Amended Complaint on March 15, 2012 [ECF No.

46], Defendant Lou Vallario’s Motion to Dismiss filed October 31, 2011 [ECF No. 16],

and Defendants Carter and Turza’s Motion to Dismiss filed December 23, 2011 [ECF

No. 30] DENIED AS MOOT. 

Dated: March 16, 2012.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60261-60262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-3-000]


Wessington Wind I LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 6, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Wessington Wind I LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 27, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any

[[Page 60262]]

FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ddbd8cfded2f3f1f4f3f8cee8ededf2efe9ddfbf8effeb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24157 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00433-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ANTHONY C. JONES,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on January 27, 2012. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for February 24, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the

documents are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no

exceptions to this policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them

an original and one (1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See 

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent necessary, the United States

Marshal for the District of Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s

appearance for this hearing.

Dated: January 27, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Notice of 
Cancellation of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee meeting on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor 
Fuels scheduled for October 24, 2008, has been cancelled. This meeting 
was published previously in the Federal Register on Friday, October 3, 
2008 (73 FR 57688).
    For further information contact the Designated Federal Official Mr. 
Christopher L. Brown (Telephone: 301-415-7111) between 8:45 a.m. and 
5:30 p.m. (ET).

    Dated: October 8, 2008.
Cayetano Santos,
Branch Chief, ACRS.
[FR Doc. E8-24501 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1




                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Easton Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Jianjun Zhang, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: July 23, 2004


/s/ Jianjun Zhang
------------------------
Jianjun Zhang, President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02759-PAB-KMT

ROCKY MOUNTAIN TRACKING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD D. FRY, an Individual,

MARK PHILLIPS, an Individual, and

ROBERT PHILLIPS, an Individual,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss With

Prejudice [Docket No. 27]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in

the premises. It is

ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice [Docket No. 27] is

GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims

asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’

fees and costs. 

DATED January 30, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02759-PAB-KMT Document 28 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1