alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6828

COLON ALSTON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TILLERY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JOHN R. WILLIAMS; MR. GAYLOR; MRS. BROWN; MR. BABB, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-162-5-BR) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Colon Alston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Colon Alston, Jr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v. Tillery Corr. Inst. , No. CA-00-162-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2000).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.11 Sector Discrepancies** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered June 25, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00545

- CR

THOMAS DAMIEN MCLEAN

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31671



### O RDER

T he clerk’s record, filed May 22, 2018, does not contain the jury charge on

guilt/innocence or the jury charge on punishment. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(a).

We ORDER the Hunt C ounty District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record

containing the jury charge on guilt/innocence and the jury charge on punishment within TEN

DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02339-LTB

ANDRE BARTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY ECHEART, Adams County Jail,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 30) is DENIED and the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No.

29) will not be considered because this action is closed. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue any

claims, he must commence a new action.

Dated: February 6, 2015

Case 1:11-cv-02339-LTB Document 31 Filed 02/06/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
                                 ACCOUNTING FIRM

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-140273 of First National Master Note
Trust and First National Funding, LLC on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 27,
2009, relating to Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing
Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for First National Bank of Omaha
and First National Credit Card Center, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of First National Master Note Trust and First National Funding, LLC
for the year ended December 31, 2008.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 27, 2009
Omaha, Nebraska
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>       SEP-30-1998

<CASH>                  23,556,950 
<SECURITIES>                  0    
<RECEIVABLES>              886,946 
<ALLOWANCES>                  0    
<INVENTORY>                   0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>        24,443,896 
<PP&E>                  83,211,563 
<DEPRECIATION>                0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>         115,982,294 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    1,810,435 
<BONDS>                 56,308,115 
<COMMON>                      0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0    
<PREFERRED>                   0    
<OTHER-SE>              43,114,732 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>115,982,294 
<SALES>                 14,049,127 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>        19,265,955 
<CGS>                         0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>            4,713,187 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>           509,132 
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>       4,297,282 
<INCOME-PRETAX>          9,746,354 
<INCOME-TAX>                  0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>      8,136,116 
<DISCONTINUED>          20,826,930 
<EXTRAORDINARY>         (1,259,118)
<CHANGES>                     0    
<NET-INCOME>            27,703,928 
<EPS-PRIMARY>               143.93 
<EPS-DILUTED>               143.93 

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1794-DR]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1794-DR), dated September 22, 2008, 
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 22, 2008.

    Hancock and Harrison Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for Public Assistance).
    Washington County for Individual Assistance and Public 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-24091 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C., SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hickory TechCorporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David A. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of HickoryTech, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of HickoryTech.

 
| /s/ David A. Christensen                          |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| David A. Christensen                              |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| November 9, 2006                                  |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7282

BENJAMIN HUBBARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH

CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-98-713-6-22AK)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 19, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Hubbard appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hubbard v. South Carolina, No. CA-98-713-6-22AK

(D.S.C. Aug. 10, 1998). We deny the motion to authorize transcripts at the Government’s expense and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 8, 2007*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.1 Credit Market Debt Outstanding1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### MYERS v. SERBIN, INC.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-357-CR

SCOTT GREGORY HUMMEL	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	After pleading guilty, Appellant Scott Gregory Hummel was convicted  of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and the jury assessed his punishment at twenty and thirty years’ confinement respectively in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  The trial court sentenced him accordingly.

	In one issue, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by not listing the terms and conditions of community supervision in the jury charge.  As Appellant recognizes, this court has held otherwise.2  We decline Appellant’s invitation to overrule our prior opinions.  Consequently, we hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to list the terms and conditions of community supervision in the jury charge.  We overrule Appellant’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

									PER CURIAM

PANEL F:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 15, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee
 for the Hugoton Royalty Trust:

We are aware that Cross Timbers Oil Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements Nos. 333-81849 and 333-35830 on Form S-8, Hugoton
Royalty Trust's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, which includes
our report dated July 5, 2000, covering the unaudited interim financial
information contained therein.  Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act
of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement
prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Worth, Texas
July 10, 2000

                                                                              19
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.3

                     CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

   We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 3 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-1 of Motive Communications, Inc. of our report dated April
14, 2000 relating to the financial statements of Ventix Systems, Inc., which
appear in such Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.

                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Austin, Texas

October 16, 2000
|                                        |                |                              
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | -----------------------------
|                                        |                |                              
|                                        |                |                              
|Household Home Equity Loan Trust 2001-2 |                |                              
|                                        |                |                              
|Original Principal Class A              | 670,730,000.00 |                              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)         | 670,730.00     |                              
|Original Principal Class M              | 83,840,000.00  | Sum of 1/20/2001 - 12/20/2001
|Number of Class M Bond (000's)          | 83,840.00      | Distribution Dates           
|                                        |                |                              
|Distribution Date                       |                | Total 2001 (1)               
|                                        |                |                              
|CLASS A                                 |                |                              
|Principal Distribution                  |                | 48,146,723.32                
|Class A Interest Distribution           |                | 1,963,544.64                 
|                                        |                |                              
|Total Distribution Amount - Class A     |                | 50,110,267.96                
|                                        |                |                              
|                                        |                |                              
|CLASS M                                 |                |                              
|Principal Distribution                  |                | 6,018,250.67                 
|Class M Interest Distribution           |                | 302,180.20                   
|                                        |                |                              
|Total Distribution Amount - Class M     |                | 6,320,430.87
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. BEN HUR LIFE ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sibley L. WHITE, as Mayor of the City of Bradenton, Florida, et al., Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. Term, 1936.

Casey & Walton, for plaintiff in error.

John B. Singeltary, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of error dismissed on motion of counsel for the respective parties.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02107-PAB-KLM

JANE DOE #1,

JANE DOE #2, and

JANE DOE #3,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. RE-2,

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. RE-2,

TRAVIS JON MASSE, in his individual capacity,

CHRIS KING, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Superintendent,

GINGER RAMSEY, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Principal,

MIKE LOWE, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Assistant Principal and

Athletic Director,

MARK SCHMIDT, in his individual capacity,

MATT SCHMIDT, in his individual capacity,

JASON WANEKA, in his individual capacity, and

JASMINE MASSE, in her individual capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to File Amended

Complaint and Jury Demand [Docket No. 38; Filed October 17, 2011] (the “Motion”).

Although the time has run for Plaintiffs to amend their complaint once as a matter of

course, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), the Motion is unopposed, and the case is in the very

early stages of litigation. Thus, the Court finds that granting leave to amend pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) is appropriate. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is

directed to enter the Amended Complaint and Jury Demand located at Docket No 38-2,

effective as of the date of this Minute Order. Defendants shall answer or otherwise

respond to the Amended Complaint on or before November 2, 2011.

Dated: October 18, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02107-PAB-KLM Document 40 Filed 10/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### George WALTON, alias Waldon, v. STATE.

3 Div. 758.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 14, 1935.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case charged the appellant with the offense of burglary. Specifically, that with intent to steal he broke into and entered the storehouse of F. C. Middleton, in which goods,, merchandise, or clothing, things of value, were kept for usé, sale, or deposit, etc. The record shows that before entering upon the trial in the court below, the defendant moved to quash the indictment, which motion was overruled, and defendant excepted. So far as we can ascertain from the record, there was no error in this ruling. No grounds of the motion, or other insistence, is contained in the record. The defendant was tried and convicted, “as bhargeü in the indictment,” and ‘the court duly sentenced *923him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary as the law requires. Judgment of conviction was properly pronounced and entered, from which this appeal was taken.

No error appears in any ruling of the lower court upon the trial of this case. The record also is free from error. It follows that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.
|EXHIBIT 10(2)(a)
BELROSE REALTY CORP.AMENDMENT NO. 1toMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of May 29, 2007, to the Management Agreement dated as of March 19, 2002 (the Agreement), is made between the parties to the Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

2. Compensation of the Manager. For the services, payments and facilities to be furnished hereunder by the Manager, the Manager shall be entitled to receive from BRC in respect of each month a monthly management fee at the rate of 1/20th of 1% of the average daily gross assets of BRC. The term gross assets means the value of all assets of BRC, including BRC's ratable share of the assets of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, real estate joint ventures, and co-owned real property investments, without reduction by any liabilities. Such compensation shall be paid monthly in arrears on the last business day of each month. The value of BRCs assets shall be computed daily in accordance with the by-laws of BRC and any resolutions of the directors of BRC. In case of initiation or termination of this Agreement during any month with respect to BRC, the fee for that month shall be based on the number of calendar days during which it is in effect.

Except as amended hereby, the terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force in effect.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed as of the day and year first written above.

|BELROSE REALTY CORPORATION    
|------------------------------
|By: /s/ Maureen Gemma         
|Vice President                
|BOSTON MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
|By: /s/ Deidre Walsh          
|Vice President
Exhibit 4.33
 (MITEL LOGO)
    
    Mitel Networks
350 Legget Drive
P.O. Box 13089
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K2K 2W7Telephone:613 592-2122
  
     www.Mitel.com




---



##### 



Yours truly,/s/ Paul Butcher
    
    
    
    /s/ Kathy EnrightPaul Butcher,
    
    
    
    Kathy Enright,Chief Operating Officer,
    
    
    
    Head of Global Human Resources,Mitel Networks Corporation
    
    
    
    Mitel Networks Corporation
 I accept the offer of employment with Mitel Networks, upon the terms and conditions set out in this
letter.
 /s/ Ron Wellard
    
    
    
    Dec 15/03Accepted
    
    
    
    Date




---



##### 



ATTACHMENT A
 Objectives:
    
    Mitel Networks Corporation (Mitel) wishes to retain the executives it
requires to achieve its projected targets by treating its executives in a fair
and equitable manner, with due consideration to competitive practices.Policy
Statement:
    
    Upon dismissal of an executive by the Corporation for reason other than
for cause, the Corporation will continue the payment of the base salary of
the executive for a period of twelve (12) months, from the termination
date, the whole less requisite source deductions. Should alternate
employment commence during the twelve (12) month period, the
Corporation agrees to pay to the executive, a lump sum payment equal
to 50% of the base salary which would have been paid for the remainder
of the twelve (12) month period, less requisite source deductions. With
the exception of LTD and Business Accident Travel Insurance, Mitel will
continue the life insurance and medical/dental coverage the executive
had prior to termination, until the end of the twelve month period or the
date of employment of the executive by another firm, whichever comes first.As used herein, cause shall mean gross misconduct or substantial
negligence by the executive in performing his duties, the commission by
the executive of an act of theft, dishonesty, embezzlement or vandalism
against the Corporation or the conviction of the executive for a criminal
offence for which the executive is sentenced by a court of competent
jurisdiction or incarceration.Note:
    
    If the employment of the executive is so terminated for cause, the
executive shall continue to accrue and receive his said salary and
benefits through to the date of termination and no more.
 Dated December 8, 2006/s/ Ron WellardRon Wellard