alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 597

- CV

EX PARTE Robert ARREDONDO

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 24 , 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

On August 16, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining

Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz has failed to give him “good time” credit during his 180 day confinement

after being held in contempt for failure to pay child support. However, a relator is not entitled to

habeas corpus relief unless he was deprived of his liberty without due process of law, or if we

conclude the judgment ordering him confined is void. See In re Alexander , 243 S.W.3d 822, 824

(Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2007, orig. proceeding). Relator has failed to meet his burden to show

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No . 2000

- EM5

- 04545 , in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding.04

- 11

- 00597

- CV

- 2

- he is entitled to habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DENIED.

PER CURIAM
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1488 Lower Tribunal No. 20 19

- C F

- 0 15980

- A

- O

_____________________________ M ICHAEL E AGLE , Appellant ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the C ircuit Court for Orange County

. Jenifer M. Harris , Ju dge.

M ar ch 5, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED

. STARGEL, WOZNIAK and GANNAM , JJ. , c oncur.

Brandon F. Dark , of Law Office of Brandon F. Dark, P.A. , Altamonte Springs , for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Order entered October 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01044-CV

CHANDLER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

FIRST SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Dc-12-06968

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s October 23, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on October 23, 2013 filed 

as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS

LAURA S. RODGERS, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

TIMECENTRE, INC., a Colorado corporation;

DIMENSIONS GROUP, INC., a California corporation;

DIMENSIONS GROUP, LLC, a Georgia company;

DIMENSIONS USA, INC., a Georgia corporation;

DIMENSIONS MIDDLE EAST, LLC, an Indian company; and

DIMENSIONS GROUP PRIVATE LTD., an Indian company,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 08/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 18th day of August, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS Document 3 Filed 08/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60338-60339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,758]


Lear Corporation, Quality Control and Inspection Department, 950 
Loma Verde Drive, El Paso, Texas; Notice of Affirmative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    In an application post-marked September 4, 2008 a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of Lear Corporation, Quality Control and Inspection 
Department, located at 950 Loma Verde Drive, El Paso, Texas (subject 
firm).
    The negative determination was issued on August 21, 2008. The 
Department's Notice of determination was published in the Federal 
Register on September 3, 2008 (73 FR 51530). Workers performed testing 
and inspection of component parts (terminals, connectors, wires, and 
grommets) for wire harnesses. The determination stated that the subject 
firm does not produce an article within the meaning of Section 
222(a)(2) of the Act. The determination further stated that because the 
subject workers are denied eligibility to apply for TAA, the workers 
cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
    The request for reconsideration stated that subject firm ``held two 
very different departments * * * the Quality Control and Inspection 
Dept. * * * and the other one was the PPAP Dept. (Production Part 
Approval Process). The

[[Page 60339]]

request further states that the appeal is limited to the ``PPAP Dept.''
    The request for reconsideration alleges that the PPAP ``is an 
essential part of the production process, it is directly involved in 
the manufacturing of the final product in the production line'' and 
that ``Lear Corporation took our jobs to Mexico.''
    The Department has carefully reviewed the worker's request for 
reconsideration and has determined that the Department will conduct 
further investigation.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of October 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-24122 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                
<ARTICLE>                                                            5
                                                                      
<S>                                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                           $1,015,444
<SECURITIES>                                                      12,920,314
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    10,616,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     9,924
<INVENTORY>                                                         1,389,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  28,422,858
<PP&E>                                                               14,305,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  (2,833,535)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     54,819,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                8,766,836
<BONDS>                                                              5,131,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             40,071,988
<OTHER-SE>                                                           849,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         54,819,475
<SALES>                                                              21,141,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     28,112,510
<CGS>                                                                11,045,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        30,190,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (2,077,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         (490,954)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (1,586,855)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (1,586,855)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        (0.21)
        
 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



|     |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                        |                       |  | 
|---- |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- |  | 
|LOGO |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                        | Deloitte & Touche LLP
|     |  |  |  |  | First National Tower 1601 Dodge Street,
Ste. 3100 Omaha, NE 68102-1649 USA
 Tel: +1 402 346 7788
Fax: +1 402 997 7875
www.deloitte.com

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-190096 and 333-1990096-01 of First National Master Note
Trust and First National Funding LLC on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 26, 2014, relating to Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB for First National Bank of
Omaha, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First National Master Note Trust and First National Funding LLC for the year ended December 31, 2013.



LOGO

March 26, 2014
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-190096 and 333-190096-01 of First National Master NoteTrust and First National Funding LLC on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 26, 2015, relating to Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria Pursuant toItem 1122 of Regulation AB for First National Bank of Omaha, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First National Master Note Trust and First National Funding LLC for the year endedDecember 31, 2014.
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 201 / Thursday, October 16, 2008 / Notices 61403 

[FR Doc. E8–24458 Filed 10–15–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES 

SAFETY BOARD 

Revision of Routine Uses of Privacy 

Act Systems of Records 

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities 

Safety Board (Board). 

ACTION: Notice of revision of routine 

uses of Privacy Act systems of records. 

SUMMARY: Each Federal agency is 

required by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 

U.S.C. 552a, to publish a description of 

the systems of records containing 

personal information defined by the 

Act. In this notice, the Board updates 

the routine uses to all systems of records 

as required by the Office of Management 

and Budget Memorandum, M–07–16, 

dated May 22, 2007, entitled 

‘‘Safeguarding Against and Responding 

to the Breach of Personally Identifiable 

Information.’’ This new routine use 

enables the Board to quickly and 

effectively respond to a breach of 

personally identifiable information 

through disclosure of information 

regarding the breach to those 

individuals affected by it, as well as to 

persons and entities in a position to 

cooperate, either by assisting in 

notification to the affected individuals 

or playing a role in preventing or 

minimizing harms from the breach. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard A. Azzaro, General Counsel, 

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 

625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, 

Washington, DC 20004, (202) 694–7000, 

mailbox@dnfsb.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board 

adds the following paragraph to each of 

its eight systems of records, under the 

section entitled, ‘‘Routine Uses of 

Records Maintained in the System, 

Including Categories of Users and the 

Purpose of Such Uses:’’The Board will 

disclose information to appropriate 

agencies, entities, and persons when the 

Board (1) Suspects or has confirmed that 

the security or confidentiality of 

informationin the system of records has 

been compromised; (2) determines that 

as a result of the suspected or confirmed 

compromise there is a risk of harm to 

economic or property interests, identity 

theft or fraud, or harm to the security or 

integrity of this system or other systems 

or programs (whether maintained by the 

Board or another agency or entity) that 

rely upon the compromised 

information; and (3) deems the 

disclosure made to such agencies, 

entities, and persons is reasonably 

necessary to assist in connection with 

the Board’s efforts to respond to the 

suspected or confirmed compromise 

and prevent, minimize, or remedy such 

harm. 

Dated: October 7, 2008. 

A.J. Eggenberger, 

Chairman. 

[FR Doc. E8–24577 Filed 10–15–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3670–01–P
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of
a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c) presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date or our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2006



By:

/s/ Curtis W. MewbourneCurtis W. Mewbourne Chief Executive Officer Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the
Registrant
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02710-WJM-MEH

ELIZABETH E. LUCHANSKY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ACCOUNT BROKERS OF LARIMER COUNTY, INC., a Colorado corporation

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss

With Prejudice filed on February 20, 2012 (ECF No. 12). The Court having reviewed

the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The above-captioned

matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay her or its own

attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated this 21st day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

______________________ _

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02710-WJM-MEH Document 13 Filed 02/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: October 9, 2012

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Probation Officer: Gary Burney

Interpreter: Tatiana Contreras

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

LUIS JORGE MARTINEZ-VALDIVIA, John Baxter

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

3:36 p.m. Court in session.

Defendant present in custody.

Interpreter sworn.

Change of Plea Hearing on May 24, 2012. Defendant pled guilty to Counts 1, 3, 4 and 7 of

the Superseding Indictment.

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The Government does request departure (Doc. #372, 380, 390) Argument.

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a).

Allocution. - None.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 395 Filed 10/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Sentencing Minutes

Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. No further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #372) is DENIED as

moot. 

The Government’s Amended Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #390) is

DENIED. The departure request is based on Doc. #380 pursuant to the

Government’s request.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

4:14 p.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 38 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 395 Filed 10/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### FARMERS COOPERATIVE COMPANY, WAHOO, NEBRASKA, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 10773.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 27, 1937.

Louis B. Montfort, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to Review Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals dismissed without costs to either party in this court, pursuant to stipulation of parties.
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Hickory Tech Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John W. Finke, Chief Executive Officer of HickoryTech,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof HickoryTech.
| /s/ John W. Finke                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John W. Finke                         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 1, 2007                        |

 

----