alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1757 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1757

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent 
  certain authorities for veterans' benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2007

 Mr. Akaka (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend or make permanent 
  certain authorities for veterans' benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCES TO TITLE 38, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' 
Authorities Expansion Act of 2007''.
    (b) References.--Except as otherwise expressly provided, whenever 
in this Act an amendment or repeal is expressed in terms of an 
amendment or repeal to a section or other provision, the reference 
shall be considered to be made to a section or other provision of title 
38, United States Code.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT TREATMENT AUTHORITY FOR PARTICIPANTS IN DOD CHEMICAL 
              AND BIOLOGICAL TESTING CONDUCTED BY DESERET TEST CENTER 
              (INCLUDING PROJECT SHIPBOARD HAZARD AND DEFENSE).

    Section 1710(e)(3) is amended--
            (1) in clause (B), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (2) by striking ``; and'' at the end of clause (C) and all 
        that follows before the period at the end of paragraph (3).

SEC. 3. PERMANENT AND RETROACTIVE AUTHORITY FOR VA TO FURNISH 
              GOVERNMENT HEADSTONES OR MARKERS FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS 
              IN PRIVATE CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2306 is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (d)(3); and
            (2) by re-designating paragraph (d)(4) as paragraph (d)(3).
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of section 2306(d) of title 38, 
United States Code, as amended by this Act, apply to a veteran who died 
on or after November 1, 1990.

SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF INCREASE IN BENEFIT FOR INDIVIDUALS PURSUING 
              APPRENTICESHIP OR ON-THE-JOB TRAINING.

    Section 103 of the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2004 
(Public Law No. 108-454; 118 Stat. 3600), as amended, is amended by 
striking ``2008'' each place it appears and inserting ``2011''.

SEC. 5. EXTENSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE.

    Section 3485(a)(4) is amended by striking ``June 30, 2007'' each 
place it appears and inserting ``September 30, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior Judge John L. Kane

Date: December 18, 2013 Deputy Clerk: Bernique Abiakam

Court Reporter: Mary George

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02755-JLK

JONATHAN REYES, Scott A. Moss

Skye K. Myers

Plaintiff,

v.

SNOWCAP CREAMERY, INC.,

EMILY ARNOLD, and

ROBERT ARNOLD, Joel C. Maguire

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES

Bench Trial - Day 1

9:36 a.m. Court in session.

Court calls case. Counsel and parties present.

Preliminary remarks by the Court.

9:38 a.m. Opening statement by Mr. Myers.

10:04 a.m. Opening statement by Mr. Maguire.

10:15 a.m. Plaintiff, Jonathan Reyes, called and sworn.

Direct examination begins by Mr. Moss.

11:57 am. Court in recess.

1:24 p.m. Court in session.

Discussion regarding witness schedule.

1:26 p.m. Continued direct examination by Mr. Moss.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02755-JLK-KMT Document 97 filed 12/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
11-cv-02755-JLK

Bench Trial - Day 1

December 18, 2013

2

1:30 p.m. Cross examination begins by Mr. Maguire.

Defendants Exhibits 20 and 21, offered.

Objections OVERRULED.

Defendants Exhibits 20 and 21 ADMITTED.

1:59 p.m. Continued cross examination by Mr. Maguire.

Witness temporarily excused.

2:40 p.m. Plaintiff’s witness, Brittany Brown, called and sworn.

Direct examination begins by Mr. Moss.

3:00 p.m. Cross examination begins by Mr. Maguire.

3:02 p.m. Redirect examination by Mr. Moss.

Witness excused.

3:03 p.m. Court in recess.

3:22 p.m. Court in session.

3:23 p.m. Plaintiff resumes the stand for continued cross examination by Mr.

Maguire.

4:34 p.m. Redirect examination by Mr. Moss.

4:46 p.m. Re-cross examination by Mr. Maguire.

4:47 p.m. Re-redirect examination by Mr. Moss.

Trial will resume tomorrow morning at 10:00 a.m.

4:48 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing continued.

Time in court - 05:26 

Case No. 1:11-cv-02755-JLK-KMT Document 97 filed 12/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Walter H. BEECH.

No. 1656.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 12, 1938.

Summerfield S. Alexander, U. S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan.

Yankey, Osborne & Sears, of Wichita, Kan., for appellee.

Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1786-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1786-DR), dated September 2, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 2, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 2, 2008.

    Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, Concordia, De 
Soto, East Carroll, Jackson, Lincoln, Madison, Morehouse, Ouachita, 
Red River, Richland, Tensas, Union, Webster, and West Carroll 
Parishes for Public Assistance (already designated for emergency 
protective measures [Category B], including direct Federal 
assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036; 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-24085 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Debra Gieniec, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 195 C.D. 2015

:

Workers' Compensation Appeal :

Board (Palmerton Hospital and :

HM Casualty Insurance Co.), :

Respondents :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2015, it is ordered that the 

above-captioned opinion filed on November 3, 2015, shall be designated 

OPINION, rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

 

 ROBERT SIMPSON, Judge
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-08-350-CR				

AMBER LEIGH FREEMAN						       	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Motion To Withdraw Notice Of Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 20, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02725-MSK-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF WHOLESALE

SPECIALTIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HURST & BURR MECHANICAL, INC.;

JE HURLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.;

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY; and

JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02725-MSK-CBS Document 4 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 27th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02725-MSK-CBS Document 4 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 21, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 21, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0213. KENDAL MEGAN DOMENICONE v. MICHAEL SCOTT DOMENICONE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014CV254205
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Cosi, Inc.
Deerfield, Illinois We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-116005) and Form S-8 (No. 333-104319) of Cosi, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2005,
relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of Cosi, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form
10-K. /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2005 88
##### 



Exhibit 10.25
 Summary of Base Salaries
For Specified Executive Officers
of Bakers Footwear Group, Inc.
  Name and Principal Position (1)
    
    Base SalaryPeter A. Edison
    
    
    $350,000Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and PresidentStanley K. Tusman
    
    
    $265,000Executive Vice President and
Chief Planning OfficerMark D. Ianni
    
    
    $270,000Executive Vice President and
Chief Merchandising OfficerJoseph R. Vander Pluym
    
    
    $270,000Executive Vice President and
Chief Operations Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 8, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11208 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTHONY V. GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-221-ALL

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Anthony V. Gonzales entered a conditional guilty plea to the indictment charging him with being a felony in possession of firearms. Gonzales preserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. Gonzales argues that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his statements and all evidence discovered in the search of the home of his girlfriend, Xochita Oliveras. Gonzales argues that, following his arrest, the initial entry into the house was illegal and thatNo. 03-11208 -2- Oliveras’s subsequent consent to a search of the house did not remove the taint of the illegal entry. This court reviews the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, which in this case is the Government. United States v. Mendoza-Gonzalez , 318 F.3d 663, 666 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 538 U.S. 1049 (2003). Legal conclusions are reviewed de novo , and factual findings are reviewed for clear error. Id. It is not necessary to determine whether the initial entry was valid under the Fourth Amendment because subsequent, voluntary consent to a search may remove the taint of the prior Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Richard , 994 F.2d 244, 250-52 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court’s findings that Oliveras’s consent to the search of her home was voluntary is unequivocal. “The voluntariness of consent is a question of fact.” United States v. Solis , 299 F.3d 420, 436 (5th Cir. 2002) . On appeal, Gonzales addresses none of the Solis factors to be considered in addressing the voluntariness of consent but simply asserts without support that the consent is necessarily invalid as fruit of the poisonous tree. This is not sufficient to show that the district court was clearly erroneous in its factual finding that Oliveras’s consent to search was given freely and was not the result of an compulsion or intimidation.

AFFIRMED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Intervenor

______________________

2018

- 1831

______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017

- 00116.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A ZRA H ADZIMEHMEDOVIC
, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S AMANTHA A. J AMESON
, A ARON M ATTHEW N ATHAN ; M ATTHEW D. P OWERS
, D ANIEL R ADKE
, Redwood Shores, CA; N ATHAN N OBU L OWENSTEIN
, K ENNETH J. W EATHERWAX , Lowenstein & W eatherwax LLP, Los Angeles, CA.

P ETER J. A YERS
, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2022intervenor. Also represented by D ANIEL K AZHDAN
, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE
, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED ; C OURTNEY D IXON
, J OSEPH H. H UNT
, S COTT R. M C I NTOSH
, M ELISSA N. P ATTER SON
, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK
, R EYNA
, and C UNNINGHAM
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 7, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022
#### LEPLEY v. BROWN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
exv10w102



 





EXHIBIT 10.102




Addendum to Deed



This addendum modifies the deed dated May 5, 2004 between Staar Surgical
Company and Philip Butler Stoney and Robert William Mitchell and ConceptVision
Australia.



Section 2.1 of the Deed calls for a payment of AUD $ 525,820.00 to Stoney and
AUD $ 525,820.00 to Mitchell upon signing the Deed and related Employment
Agreements.



Section 2.1 is revised to reflect a payment of AUD $131,455.00 to Stoney upon
signing the Deed and Employment Agreement and AUS $ 394,365.00 no later than
August 31, 2004. The unpaid balance of AUD $ 394,365.00 will be subject to
interest accrued at a yearly rate of 4.5% for the period between the Deed
signing and the actual payment of the outstanding balance of AUD $ 394,365.00.



Section 2.1 is revised to reflect a payment of AUD $ 262,910.00 to Mitchell
upon signing the Deed and Employment Agreement and AUS $ 262,910.00 no later
than August 31, 2004. The unpaid balance of AUD $ 262,910.00 will be subject
to interest accrued at a yearly rate of 4.5% for the period between the Deed
signing and the actual payment of the outstanding balance of AUD $ 262,910.00.



All other sections of the Deed agreement remain as executed.




EXECUTED AS A DEED



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ PHILIP BUTLER
STONEY

Concept Vision Australia

Managing Director





/s/ ROBERT WILLIAM MITCHELL

Concept Vision Australia

Director





/s/ JOHN BILY

STAAR Surgical Company

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MANSOOR SAYYED,

Petitioner

v.

MIKE, A/K/A BETIMES, INC., D/B/A NORTHERN PIKE APARTMENTS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 404 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63020-63021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 11, 2008, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'') Advanced Media Workflow 
Association, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Harmonic Inc., Santa Clara, CA, MAGIX AG, Berlin, 
Germany; Red Bee Media Limited, London, United Kingdom, SeaChange 
International, Acton, MA; and Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, CA, have 
been added as parties to this venture. Also, JW Hannay Co., Ltd., 
Glasgow, United Kingdom, has withdrawn as a party to venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned

[[Page 63021]]

activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, 
Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc. filed 
its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 27, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44773).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E8-24286 Filed 10-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                                      13
<PAGE>

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH TRUST 2002-3
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-3


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP (a "Master Servicer") and do hereby
further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                            Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER



/s/ Mark Wong                                       Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT



                                      14
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                   (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





                  Dated: May 13, 2004                   /S/ANDREW R. PERZ
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.