alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02721–MSK–KMT

BRUCE W. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MARK KELLAR, individually and in his official capacity as the health service Administrator at

FCI-Florence,

LISA MCDERMOTT, individually and in her official Capacity as Assistant Health Services

Administrator at FCI-Florence,

PETER BLUDWORTH, individually and in his official capacity as associate warden at FCIFlorence,

MIKE GOODIN, individually and in his official capacity as chief pharmacist at FCI-Florence,

DR. DAVID ALLRED, individually and in his official capacity as clinical director of FCIFlorence,

DR. GEORGE SANTINI, individually and in his official capacity as staff Physician at FCIFlorenece,

CARI RITTER, individually and in her official capacity as mid-level Provider, at FCI-Florence,

MRS. A. VINYARD, individually and in her official capacity as Physician assistant at FCIFlorence,

GILBERTA TRUJILLO, individually and in her official capacity as secretary of medical at FCI

Florence,

MR. GRIFFIN, individually and in his official capacity as Correctional Officer at FCI-Florence,

JOHN DOE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Health Programs at North Central

Region, Leavenworth, Kansas, and

DR. JAMES PELTON, individually and in his official capacity as Region Medical Director at

North Central Region, Leavenworth, Kansas,

Defendants.

SECOND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 125 Filed 02/01/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by

Chief District Judge Marcia S. Krieger, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated February 17,

2012. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b).

It is hereby ORDERED that a Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for February

26, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S.

Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado.

The parties need not comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. and 26.1. The purpose of the initial conference is to consider the nature

and status of the case, the timing for filing of any motions, and what discovery, if any, will be

needed. 

Plaintiff, or his/her case manager, shall arrange for his/her participation via telephone and

shall call (303) 335-2780 at the scheduled time.

Dated this 1st day of February, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02721-MSK-KMT Document 125 Filed 02/01/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 201 (Thursday, October 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 61432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Mentored 
Career Development, Institutional Research Training and Pathways to 
Independence Applications.
    Date: October 24, 2008.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kan Ma, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
NIH/NIAMS, EP Review Branch, One Democracy Plaza Suite 800, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-4872, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#721f131940321f131b1e5c1c1b1a5c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fe2eee4bdcfe2eee6e3a1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-24221 Filed 10-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 7, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.220 Commercial Mortgages** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[No. 34631.

*En Banc.*

November 13, 1958.]

#### Utah-Idaho Sugar Company *et al., Appellants,*v. Washington Farm Mutual Insurance Company *et al., Respondents.**1*

*Minnick & Hahner, James B. Mitchell,*and *Charles Snyder,*for appellants.

*Gose, Williams & Gose,*for respondents.

1

 Reported in 331 P. (2d) 538.

Per Curiam.

The gist of the appellants’ appeal is their request that we reverse *Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Wachsmith,*2 Wn. (2d) 679, 99 P. (2d) 420, 127 A. L. R. 531, which is squarely in point upon the proper interpretation of the language of the insurance policy here in question. We have not been persuaded to do so.

Our reference to that case makes it unnecessary to repeat the language, discussion, and citations to be found therein, since such a course would add nothing to the decisional law of this state upon the subject.

The judgment is affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129061 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129061 COA: 261762 Genesee CC: 03-012727-FC LESTER LEON RICHARDS, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 31, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
#### Huston MURPHY v. STATE.

6 Div. 683.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 30, 1935.

W. G. Black and Stephen B. Coleman, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

RICE, Judge.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         (1,431)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,854
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,890
<PP&E>                                          25,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,278,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,780
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,278,786
<SALES>                                         30,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,819
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (654)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (654)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
National City				

Mortgage					**National City Mortgage Co.
3232 Newmark Drive  Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

						Telephone (937) 910 1200
**Mailing Address:**
P.O. Box 1820

Dayton, Ohio 45401 1820

Management's Assertion on Compliance with Minimum Servicing

Standards Set Forth in the *Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers*
Report of Management

We, as members of management of National City Mortgage Co. (NCM), are responsible for complying with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP). We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with these standards. We have performed an evaluation of NCM's compliance with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of December 31, 2002 and for the year then ended. Based on this evaluation, we assert that during the year ended December 31, 2002, NCM complied, in all material respects, with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period, NCM had in effect a fidelity bond policy in the amount of $50 million and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $40 million.

 
***Charles Abourezk

Charles Abourezk, Senior Vice President

 

February 24, 2003

 

 

 

 

Mgmt Assertion.doc

 

 *****
Exhibit 34.4

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Exhibit 33.4) that HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(4)(viii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the Applicable Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by private label credit card receivables, as of and for the period from February 14, 2007 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report) through December 31, 2007.  Exhibit 33.4 identifies the individual asset-backed securitization transactions (the Covered Transactions) defined by managementas part of their assessment. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to the Covered Transactions.  Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Covered Transactions, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Covered Transactions, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period from February 14, 2007 through December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 3, 2008
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Hickory Tech Corporation (HickoryTech) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Duffy, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of HickoryTech, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of HickoryTech.

 
| /s/ John E.  Duffy       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| John E.  Duffy           |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 4,  2004        |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02750-BNB

ROBERT BLACKMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

BLAKE DAVIS, Complex/ADMAX Warden,

RUSSELL KRIST, Captain, 

MR. RIVERS, Lieutenant,

MR. BATULIS, Correctional Officer, and

MR. R. GOMEZ, Correctional Officer,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Plaintiff, Robert Blackman, is in the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons and

is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in Florence, Colorado. Mr. Blackman

has filed pro se a Prisoner Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 

In a November 1, 2011 Order, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland granted Mr.

Blackman leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Based

on the information Plaintiff provided about his financial status, the court found that he

was able to pay an initial partial filing fee of $6.00 pursuant to § 1915(b)(1). Mr.

Blackman was ordered to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days from the

date of the November 1 Order or show cause why he has no assets and no means by

which to pay the designated initial partial filing fee. Plaintiff was advised that in order to

show cause, he must file a current certified copy of his trust fund account statement. 

Case 1:11-cv-02750-LTB Document 7 Filed 12/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Mr. Blackman was warned that if he failed to have the designated initial partial filing fee

sent to the clerk of the court within the time allowed, or to show cause as directed

above, the Prisoner Complaint would be dismissed without further notice. 

Mr. Blackman has failed either to pay the initial partial filing fee within the time

allowed, as designated in the November 1 Order or, in the alternative, to show cause

why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. Indeed, Mr.

Blackman has not filed anything with the Court since November 1, 2011. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice for Mr. Blackman’s 

failure either to pay an initial partial filing fee of $6.00 or to show cause why he has no

assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 8th day of December , 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:11-cv-02750-LTB Document 7 Filed 12/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.2

Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

CardioDynamics International Corporation:

The audits referred to in our
report dated February 28, 2005, included the related financial statement schedule as of November 30, 2004, and for the year ended November 30, 2004, included in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 333-40969, 333-38920, 333-38922, 333-70902, and 333-119044 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-31275, 333-65331, 333-69669, 333-69663, 333-69659, 333-86475, 333-88311, 333-88307, 333-88309,
333-31702, 333-44226, 333-66396, 333-69456, 333-69458, 333-70916, 333-104236, 333-117486 and 333-134248 on Form S-3 of CardioDynamics International Corporation of our reports dated February 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year ended November 30, 2004, and the financial statement schedule which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of CardioDynamics International
Corporation as of and for the year ended November 30, 2006.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|San Diego, California
|February 13, 2007
Exhibit 12.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     I, Sian Herbert-Jones, the Chief Financial Officer of Sodexho Alliance, SA
(the "registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report;

     c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
     covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

     d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the company's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
     the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.

Date: November 26, 2004


                                       By: /s/ Sian Herbert-Jones
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Sian Herbert-Jones
                                          Title: Chief Financial
                                          Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 Exhibit 99.1(a)

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Lifeline Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-40684, 33-58632, 33-79294, 33-
59499, 333-03949, 333-03953, 333-03951) of our report dated May 21, 1997, on our
audits of the financial statements of the Lifeline Systems, Inc. Employee
Savings and Investment Plan as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years
then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 11-K.


                                       /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
June 25, 1997