alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1704 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1704

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
  To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                      1965, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``First Higher Education Extension Act 
of 2007''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.
    Section 2(a) of the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public 
Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking ``June 30, 
2007'' and inserting ``July 31, 2007''.
SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
    Nothing in this Act, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 
2005 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or otherwise 
alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or the durations of, 
programs contained in the amendments made by the Higher Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-171) to the provisions of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection 
Act of 2004.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Intraware, Inc. Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2000 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14,649
<SECURITIES>                                     3,467
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                      6,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,485
<PP&E>                                          14,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                           3
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,500
<SALES>                                         41,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,464
<CGS>                                           32,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    37
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (11,783)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,783)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Report of IndependentAuditors**

 

 

To the Board of Directorsof AmeriCredit Corp.

 

 

Re:                   Sale and Servicing Agreement related to AmeriCreditAutomobile Receivables Trust 2002-1 as of and for the year ended December 31,2002

 

 

We have examined management’sassertion about AmeriCredit Corp. and its subsidiaries’ (the “Company”)compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the MortgageBankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers*, to the extent such procedures are applicable, as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2002 included in the accompanying managementassertion (Exhibit I).  Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicingstandards.  Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination.

 

Our examination was made inaccordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary inthe circumstances.  We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination of the Company’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company has complied with the aforementioned minimumservicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

 

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

March 30, 2004

 

----

----

 

Exhibit I

 

 

Management’s Assertion Concerning Compliancewith USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

 

March 30, 2004

 

Re:      Sale and ServicingAgreement related to AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2002-1 as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2002

 

As of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2002, AmeriCredit Corp. and its subsidiaries have complied in allmaterial respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in theMortgage Bankers Association of America’s *UniformSingle Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers* (“USAP”), to theextent such procedures are applicable.

 
|  /s/  Clifton H. Morris |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Clifton H.  Morris           |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |

 
|  /s/  Daniel E. Berce |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Daniel E.  Berce           |
| President                  |

 
|  /s/  Preston A. Miller |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Preston A.  Miller           |
| Chief  Financial Officer     |

 

----

----
#### Ollie Mae ANDERSON v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### Ex parte Mrs. Jacob BURRELL.

6 Div. 761.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 25, 1935.

Cora R. Thompson, of Birmingham, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

Rule nisi denied. Scott v. Shepherd, 215 Ala. 671, 112 So. 137; Nichols v. Snead, 224 Ala. 324, 140 So. 375.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER,. BOULDIN and POSTER, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: June 18, 2012

Court Reporter: Paul Zuckerman

Probation Officer: Susan Heckman

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT MASON BYAS, Robert Berger

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

9:07 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant present in custody.

Change of Plea Hearing on March 26, 2012. Defendant pled guilty to 1, 11 and 12 of the

Superseding Indictment.

The Government orally moves to dismiss all counts of the underlying Indictment against this

defendant. Defendant has no objection.

ORDER: The Government’s oral motion to dismiss the underlying Indictment against this

defendant is GRANTED.

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The Government does request departure (Doc. #290).

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a).

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 310 Filed 06/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Sentencing Minutes

Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

Allocution. - Statements made by: The Government, defense counsel.

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. No further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Decrease for Acceptance of Responsibility (Doc.

#244) is GRANTED.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #290) is GRANTED.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

9:32 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 25 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 310 Filed 06/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
# United Sta tes Court of Appe als For the Seve nth Cir cuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 20, 2001 Bef ore Hon. ILA NA DIA MON D ROV NER, Circuit Judge

Nos. 99-4318, 99- 4319, 99-4320, 99-4345 WILLIA M BRACY and ) ROGE R CO LL INS, ) ) Appeal

from the Uni ted St ates Petitioners-Appellants, Cross-Appe llees , ) Distri ct Court f or the N orther n ) District of Illinois v. ) ) Nos. 93 C 5282, 93 C 5328 JAME S S CHO MIG and ) ROGER COW

AN, ) Wi l l i am T. Hart, Judge

. ) Respondents-Appel lees, Cross-Appellants. )
O R D E R On he r own moti on, Judge

Rov ne r m ak esthe f ol l owi ng modif i ca ti on to h er d i ss en t f rom the pan el opin i on i ssue d on A

pri l 18, 2001: At p age 21, foo t not e 4, lines 5 t hro ugh 8 , t he fo llowing t ext is delet ed: “ignor es t he po ss ibilit y t ha t t he St at e mig ht be les s w illing t o co nse nt t o a b en ch t r ial be fo r e a de fen se - fr ien dly judge , whi ch i

n turn would m

ake i t more dif fi cul t for the judge to sell

hi s servi ces. It also”.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OFCURTIS W. MEWBOURNE / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICEROF MEWBOURNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 I, Curtis W. Mewbourne, Chief Executive Officer of Mewbourne Development Corporation, Managing
General Partner of Mewbourne Energy Partners 03-A, L.P. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the
accompanying report on Form 10-K, for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of that
section. I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Curtis W. MewbourneName: Curtis W. MewbourneDate: March 29, 2005
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JAMES P. MULLINS,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT WILKIE, ACTING SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2017-1325

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 15-440, Senior Judge Lawrence B. 

Hagel.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Law Offices of Carpenter 

Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant-appellant.

 RETA EMMA BEZAK, Commercial Litigation Branch, 

Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also 

represented by CHAD A. READLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN,

JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR.; BRIAN D. GRIFFIN, DEREK 
 

SCADDEN, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 4, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Thomas W. Jasper, Chief Executive Officer of Primus Guaranty,Ltd. certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Primus Guaranty, Ltd.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.     The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     (Paragraph omitted pursuant to SECRelease Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986).

c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)     Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and

5.     The registrant's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date: March 21, 2005

|  | By: /s/ Thomas W. Jasper Name:Thomas W. Jasper Title: Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OTHONIER ALTRUZ,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 221 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: June 7, 2007Release dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Z.1 Release                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|Complete file      PDF (656 KB)


Summary statistics and table of contents      PDF (87 KB) | CSV (9 KB)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables      PDF (12 KB) | CSV (6 KB)
Flows tables      PDF (182 KB) | CSV (123 KB)
Level tables      PDF (150 KB) | CSV (107 KB)
Balance sheet tables      PDF(24 KB) | CSV (13 KB)
Supplementary tables      PDF (36 KB) | CSV (23 KB)These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web SiteRelease dates | 
Announcements | 
Coded tables |
Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | PDF (656 KB) | Data Download Program (DDP)


Statistical releasesHome |
Economic research and dataAccessibility | 
Contact Us
Last update: June 7, 2007
|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00399-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. BRANDON HENRY,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On January 27, 2012, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference to

reset the change of plea hearing in this matter. After conferring with counsel and with

their consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on February 15, 2012, commencing at 9:00 a.m., the court shall conduct

a change of plea hearing in this matter;

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing.

Dated: January 27, 2012
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2016

No. 04-16-00728-CV

IN RE LINK NEW TECH INC., and Granitize of San Antonio, Inc.,

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On November 4, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency 

motion to stay. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency 

motion to Stay are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a 

later date.

It is so ORDERED on November 7, 2016.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CI17911, styled Link New Tech Inc., Granitize of San Antonio, Inc. 

v. MaxxMarka Inc., MaxxMarka International, LLC, Rasha Youssef, Clinique Hoskin, and Roxanne Salazar v. Adam 

Awad, Regavita Thomas, and Demetrice Thomas, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 

the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,421
<SECURITIES>                                     3,183
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,083<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,220
<PP&E>                                          41,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,835
<BONDS>                                          3,655
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,836
<SALES>                                         11,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,863
<CGS>                                            7,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,277
<INCOME-TAX>                                       447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                830
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       830
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>note: receivables shown net of allowance of 390
</FN>




</TABLE>
#### Ludwig O. MUENCH, Nelle T. Muench, Helen Berroyer, and Wilfred Jones, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 10822.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

*Oct.*5, 1937.

Roy Rucker, of Kansas City, Mo.,' Sam Wear, of Springfield, Mo., and Verne Lacy, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Harry C. Blanton, U. S. Atty., of Sikeston, Mo., and Herbert H. Freer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of St. Louis, Mo.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as to Helen Berroyer, without costs to either party in this court,, on motion of Helen Berroyer