alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Herman SPIELBERGER, Doing Business as H. Spielberger & Company, Appellant, v. The PHILAD COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 7917.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1938.

Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a stipulation to docket and dismiss the appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the Clerk of the District Court as required by rule 18, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, docketed and dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,096
<SECURITIES>                                    15,694
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,136
<PP&E>                                         170,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,255
<BONDS>                                         37,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,962
<SALES>                                          2,114
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,985
<CGS>                                            1,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,750
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65


</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.120 Federal Government Retirement Funds1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

Family and Youth Services Bureau, ACYF, ACF, DHHS.

# ACTION:

Notice to award supplemental grants.

*CFDA #:*                     93.592.                

*Legislative Authority:*                     Family Violence Prevention and Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10401*et seq*.)                

*Amount of Award:*                     $145,000.                

*Project Period:*                     September 30, 2008-September 29, 2009.                

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that the Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), will award a program expansion supplement award to the Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF) in San Francisco, CA to continue the provision of technical support through the Family Violence Prevention and Services (FVPSA) Discretionary Grant Program. FVPF is a leading provider of training and technical assistance for service providers who seek to improve collaboration between domestic violence and child welfare programs. The supplemental award will enable FVPF to plan and implement State-level strategies to educate policy makers and to ensure that State Domestic Violence Coalitions are key stakeholders in the Child and Family Service Review process.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Marylouise Kelley, Director, Family Violence Prevention and Services Program, 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: 202-401-5756. E-mail:                         *marylouise.kelley@acf.hhs.gov.*

Dated: September 29, 2008.

Joan E. Ohl,

Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.

 [FR Doc. E8-23478 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51267

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE GUERRA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-44-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge GuerraHernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: December 9, 2004Release dates | 
 Coded tables | 
 Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | 
 PDF (450 KB)
F.227 Investment in Bank Personal Trusts and Estates
   Billions of dollars; quarterly figures are seasonally adjusted annual rates                                                                                                                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Description
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003   Q1
2003   Q2
2003   Q3
2003   Q4
2004   Q1
2004   Q2
2004   Q3
LineBank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability
	56.6
	-59.9
	-2.4
	-26.3
	-26.6
	-26.4
	-26.4
	-25.5
	29.8
	8.2
	0.5
	1Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability
	56.6
	-59.9
	-2.4
	-26.3
	-26.6
	-26.4
	-26.4
	-25.5
	29.8
	8.2
	0.5
	2
|
|Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Bank personal trusts and estates total financial liabilities liability                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|Release dates | 
Coded tables | 
Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releasesHome | Economic research and
dataAccessibility | Contact Us Last update: December 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 23.2











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-09623, 333-39060, 333-39064, 333-39290, 333-61588, 333-101444, 333-100716, 333-104659, 333-117909, 333-117910, and 333-165537 on Form S-8 of our report dated January 14, 2010 (and December 7, 2010 as it relates to Note 1), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Shuffle Master, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the retrospective adjustment of the 2009 and 2008 financial statements for the adoption of  new authoritative guidance related to the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, including partial cash settlements), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shuffle Master, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 2010.








/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Las Vegas, Nevada


January 13, 2011
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2011 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ G. Ross McDonald       
|------------------- | ---------------------------
|                    | G. Ross McDonald           
|                    | Principal Financial Officer

---
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-138404 and No. 333-138404-01) on Form S-3 of HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I of our attestation report dated March 12, 2010 with respect to each of HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Card Services Inc., HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc., HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited and HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc. (the “HSBC Companies”) and its assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB applicable to the servicing of private label credit card receivables related to the HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I’s asset-backed securitization transactions and securities publicly issued on or after January 1, 2006 (thePlatform), except for the servicing criteria identified in Schedule I of the “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Management’s Report) as “Not Applicable”, which each of the individual HSBC Companies has determined are not applicable to the activities performed with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.  Our attestation report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 24, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1447 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1447

 To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to require the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to make decisions relating to proposed amendments to milk 
  marketing orders not later than 90 days after the date on which the 
                       Secretary holds a hearing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2007

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to require the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to make decisions relating to proposed amendments to milk 
  marketing orders not later than 90 days after the date on which the 
                       Secretary holds a hearing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEADLINE FOR AMENDMENT DECISIONS FOR MILK MARKETING ORDERS.

    Section 8c(17) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 
608c(17)), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing 
Agreement Act of 1937, is amended--
            (1) by designating the first sentence as subparagraph (A); 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Deadline for amendment decisions.--The 
                Secretary shall issue a decision relating to any 
                proposed amendment to a milk marketing order for which 
                a hearing is held under this Act not later than 90 days 
                after the date of the hearing.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02567-RPM

PIERRE D. ROEMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLOYD CAPISTRANT, a Police Officer with the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police

Department, in his Professional and Individual Capacities,

JOHN MARTIN, a Former Police Officer of the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police

Department, and Current Deputy with the Archuleta County Sheriff Department,

in his Individual and Professional Capacities,

WILLIAM ROCKENSOCK, Former Sergeant and Current Police Chief of Pagosa

Springs, Colorado Police Department, in his Professional Capacity,

JOHN DOE, Employee and Supervisor with the Pagosa Springs, Colorado Police

Department, in his/her Individual and Professional Capacities, and

SCOTT MAXWELL, Employee and Supervisory Detective with the Pagosa Springs

Police Department, in his Individual and Professional Capacities,

Defendants. 

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

____________________________________________________________________________

 

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on January 26, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the

Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver,

Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order which

may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx (Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch

Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 1/08). The proposed order (original

only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on January 19, 2012. The conference

is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted

to attend. 

Case 1:11-cv-02567-RPM Document 17 Filed 12/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated: December 6th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02567-RPM Document 17 Filed 12/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                                 LEASE ADDENDUM



         This Addendum is hereby incorporated into the Lease Agreement dated
October 1, 1999, between Atrium Northeast Limited Partnership, the Landlord, and
Integrated Business Systems & Services, Inc., the Tenant.

         Whereas the above noted parties wish to enter into a Lease space
expansion agreement in the facility known as the Atrium Northeast Office
Building at 115 Atrium Way, Columbia, South Carolina.

         Now and therefore the following provisions are agreed:

         1. This Lease Addendum will be effective beginning March 1, 2000, and
continue in effect through the existing Lease term of October 31, 2004.

         2. The Tenant has determined to expand its space to suite 207.
Accordingly, the leased premises will be expanded, in its as is condition, by
the addition of the suite's area totaling 1,350 rentable square feet.
The new rentable area will total 19,474 rentable square feet.

         3. The pro-rata share is .34, or 34%, percent.

         4. Base rental will be adjusted to $24,748.21 per month March 1, 2000,
through October 31, 2000. Base Rental increases November 1, 2000, through
October 31, 2001 to $25,153.93 per month. Base Rental increases November 1,
2001, through October 31, 2004, to $25,559.63 per month. First year's Annual
Base Rental is $296,978.50. Second year's Annual Base Rental increases to
$301,847.00. Third through fifth year's Annual Base Rental increases to
$306,715.50.

         5. Landlord will provide an allowance of $6,075.00 to be used for
improvements to premises.

         Except as outlined above, all terms and conditions of the original
Integrated Business Systems & Services, Inc., Lease shall remain in full force
and effect.

Agreed this ___ day of February, 2000, by and between


ATRIUM NORTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

BY:
   ----------------------------------
ITS:
   ----------------------------------

INTEGRATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS & SERVICES, INC.

BY:
   ----------------------------------

ITS:
   ----------------------------------
818 A.2d 319

#### GEORGE C. EVERETT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued January 7, 2003

Decided March 6, 2003.

*Diana La Femina-Rosa*argued the cause for appellant *(Maloof Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske,*attorneys).

*Thomas F. McGuire, Sr.,*argued the cause for respondent.

*568PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 358 *N.J.Super.*400, 818 A.2d 372 (2001).

LONG, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the entry of summary judgment in favor of State Farm. Like the dissenter below, Judge Fisher, I conclude that State Farm’s bookkeeping entry, reflecting an adjustment to plaintiffs deductible is not a “payment” under *N.J.S.A.*39:6A-13.1(a) or within common parlance.

Justice VERNIERO joins in this opinion.

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice PORITZ and JUSTICES COLEMAN, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN — 5.

*For reversal*— Justices LONG and VERNIERO — 2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,250,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,379,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   170,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,345,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,362,000
<PP&E>                                         742,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (376,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,364,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,363,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,931,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,364,000
<SALES>                                     27,656,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,656,000
<CGS>                                       26,030,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,030,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,219,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,466,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,466,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,466,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)


</TABLE>