alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos.333-116655, 333-128903, and 333-135244) and in the related Prospectuses, and on Forms S-8 (Nos.033-56384-99, 033-56386-99, 033-65790-99, 033-64349-99, 333-13531-99, 333-36598-99, 333-48320-99,333-48322-99, 333-53633-99, 333-81678-99, 333-81676-99, 333-112378, and 333-134425) of WeatherfordInternational Ltd. of our reports dated February 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Weatherford International Ltd., Weatherford International Ltd.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Weatherford International Ltd.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPHouston, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61192-61193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24531]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

October 9, 2008.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department

[[Page 61193]]

Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 14, 
2008 to be assured of consideration.

United States Mint

    OMB Number: 1525-0013.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Application for Commercial Product License and Application 
for Intellectual Property Use.
    Forms: 3044, 3045.
    Description: The application forms allow individuals and business 
entities to apply for Non-product License or Commercial Product License 
to use United States Mint intellectual property and trademark and 
copyright materials for products.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 131 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Yvonne Pollard (202) 354-6784, United States 
Mint, 799 9th Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20220.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-24531 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
#### LAMB & JOHNSON v. STATE (two cases).

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge David Wasick, Settlement Judge Julie Bachman Ailing & Jillson, Ltd. Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) (947A 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1496 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1496

   To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to include pollinators in 
                     certain conservation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2007

Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
Nelson of Florida, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Craig, Mr. Casey, Mr. Dorgan, Mrs. 
Feinstein, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Brown, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Allard, 
Ms. Collins, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Thune, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Tester, Mr. Feingold, 
   Mr. Sanders, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. 
    Roberts, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Crapo, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Conrad) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to include pollinators in 
                     certain conservation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pollinator Habitat Protection Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1231(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 
(16 U.S.C. 3831(a)) is amended by striking ``and wildlife'' and 
inserting ``wildlife, and pollinator habitat''.
    (b) Payments.--Section 1234(c)(3)(A) of the Food Security Act of 
1985 (16 U.S.C. 3834(c)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ``, or 
pollinator habitat,'' after ``wildlife habitat''.

SEC. 3. CONSERVATION SECURITY PROGRAM.

    Section 1238A of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3838a) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``(including 
        pollinators)'' after ``animal life''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)(4)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (R), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (S) as 
                subparagraph (T); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (R) the 
                following:
                    ``(S) pollinator habitat improvement; and''.

SEC. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1240(3) of the Food Security Act of 1985 
(16 U.S.C. 3839aa(3)) is amended by inserting ``pollinators,'' before 
``and wildlife''.
    (b) Incentive Payments.--Section 1240B(e)(2) of the Food Security 
Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3839aa-2(e)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``pollinator habitat,'' after ``invasive species,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan Mangold, Also Known as John Mangold, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered on November 21, 1984, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Asch, Wallach and Smith, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

s0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

151244

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151244

COA: 325300

Allegan CC: 13

- 018552

- FH

TALONZO DEMONT BROYLES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Allegan Circuit Court to

determin e whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under

the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge , 498 Mich 358 (2015). On

remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If

the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence

a bsent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1737 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a waiver 

of the 35-mile drive requirement for designations of critical access hospitals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a waiver of the 35-mile drive requirement for designations of critical access hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Critical Access Hos5 pital Flexibility Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF 35-MILE DRIVE REQUIREMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1820(c) of the Social Se8 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)) is amended— 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1737 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(B)(i), by striking ‘‘is a 

2 hospital’’ and inserting ‘‘subject to paragraph (3), is 

3 a hospital’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3) WAIVER OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS.— 

7 The Secretary may waive the requirements under 

8 subclauses (I) and (II) of paragraph (2)(B)(i) for 

9 designation of a critical access hospital by a State 

10 in any case where the Secretary determines such 

11 waiver is appropriate.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall apply to cost reporting periods begin14 ning on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
#### RITTER v. PLOTKIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02712-REB-KMT

LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERIFF TED MINKS,

MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager,

JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010,

LT. MARTINALLI,

LT. G. GITTIN,

LT. J. LUCAS,

ADMINISTRATIVE SGT. RENFRO,

SGT. TROY BETKA,

SGT. SCOTT HAPP,

SGT. STEVEN WYGANT,

OFFICER KATHRINE FEROE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF CRUMBAKER,

DEPUTY SHERIFF RYAN VIERS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DUSTIN DYELING,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ANTHONY KOTRIS,

DEPUTY SHERIFF DONALD SPRINGFIELD,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HOLLEY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES GELEUDE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF JASON RICHARDSON,

DEPUTY SHERIFF REID PERRY,

DEPUTY SHERIFF WILLIAM BOHM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF ERIK BOUGHAM,

DEPUTY SHERIFF HERBERT LONGSHORE,

DEPUTY SHERIFF #1958 (Name Unknown),

COUNSELOR MIKE COLLINS,

COUNSELOR SUPERVISOR DEBRA ELUDO,

CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT,

CLAUDIA VAN BUREN/HSA,

RAYMOND HERR, Responsible Physician,

TRACY HAINES, LPN, and

KATHERINE BECERRA, RN,

Defendants.

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 145 Filed 02/13/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

2

MINUTE ORDER1

The Motion for [Full Record] Be Transmitted Pursuant Rule 24(c) Fed. R.

App. P. and Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 753(f) [#140] filed April 17, 2013, is

DENIED as moot. The record in this case has been transmitted to the United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Dated: February 13, 2014

Case 1:11-cv-02712-REB-KMT Document 145 Filed 02/13/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02697–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MOUNTAIN STATES LINE CONSTRUCTORS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING

COMMITTEE, 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Urgent Request for Missing Documents” (Doc. No. 33, filed May 4, 2012) is

DENIED. Plaintiff requests that the court provide her with all but a few of the documents

previously filed in this case because she has had “technical problems” with the court’s CM/ECF

filing system that resulted in her having to pay “hundreds of dollars for documents that are

supposed to be free.” However, notwithstanding Plaintiff’s suggestion that the court is

“obligated to provide plaintiff with these documents,” the court has no legal basis to order the

Clerk of Court to provide her with free copies of court filings. Outside of a few exceptions that

are inapplicable here, the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, “makes no provision for

litigation expenses.” Patel v. United States, 399 F. App’x 355, 359 (10th Cir. 2010). Plaintiff

may print copies of previously-filed documents through the Clerk’s Office for $.10 per page. 

The court further notes that notwithstanding Plaintiff’s suggestion that she has “canceled” her

CM/ECF account, Plaintiff is required to demonstrate good cause before her ECF registration

may be revoked. See D.C.COLO. ECF Civ. Procedures 3.2D. Accordingly, Plaintiff may file a

motion no later than May 23, 2012 demonstrating good cause to support the revocation of her

ECF privileges. If no such motion is filed by May 23, 2012, the court will assume that Plaintiff

intends to retain her ECF privileges. Until that time, the court will serve any court-initiated

filings (e.g. orders and/or recommendations) on Plaintiff at her home address as featured in her 

Case 1:11-cv-02697-REB-KMT Document 37 Filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Complaint. Defendant is directed to do the same (i.e. serve Plaintiff with its court filings, if any,

at her home address).

Dated: May 9, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02697-REB-KMT Document 37 Filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                           385,427
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 25,449,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     791,240
<INVENTORY>                                                    9,073,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              40,691,551
<PP&E>                                                        17,109,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 4,116,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                75,189,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         42,542,809
<BONDS>                                                        1,928,628
<COMMON>                                                           8,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                    5,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    23,422,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  75,189,802
<SALES>                                                       91,813,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              91,813,257
<CGS>                                                         65,219,287
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 24,712,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             2,170,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  227,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     202,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               25,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      25,375
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1539 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1539

     To designate the post office located at 309 East Linn Street, 
     Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott Nisely Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2007

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To designate the post office located at 309 East Linn Street, 
     Marshalltown, Iowa, as the ``Major Scott Nisely Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR SCOTT NISELY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The post office located at 309 East Linn Street, 
Marshalltown, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the ``Major Scott 
Nisely Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the post office referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Scott Nisely Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0                     663
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   5,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   1,470
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                   6,111
<PP&E>                                               0                  17,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                   6,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  23,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  10,040
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                      56
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                   8,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  23,947
<SALES>                                         10,680                  20,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,680                  20,134
<CGS>                                            7,104                  13,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,876                  22,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (10)                    (26)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 626                   1,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,812)                 (3,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,812)                 (3,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,446)                 (5,653)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)                  (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)                  (0.11)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.22

May 15, 2000


Mr. William Rasmussen
Transgenomic Inc
5600 S 42 St
Omaha, NE 68107


Dear Bill:

First National Bank of Omaha officially waives Transgenomic's non-compliance
with the following covenants as defined in the Loan Agreement dated March 8,
2000, as amended from time to time, as of the company's quarterly statement
dated March 31, 2000:

     1.   Covenant requiring Borrower to maintain a maximum Debt to Tangible Net
          Worth of not more than 1.5:1.0. As of 3-31-2000 the company's Debt to
          Tangible Net Worth was 1.87:1.0.

     2.   Covenant requiring Borrower to maintain a minimum Working Capital of
          $3,000,000. As of 3-31-2000 the Borrower's Working Capital was
          $2,643,493.

     3.   Covenant requiring Borrower to maintain Borrowing Base in excess of
          balance due Bank. The Borrower exceeded the Borrowing Base by
          $295,431.

This waiver is based on the Borrower's internally prepared March 31, 2000
balance sheet and operating statement. This letter does NOT waive Borrower's
obligation to perform any other covenants or requirements contained in the said
Loan Agreement, nor does it constitute a waiver of the above covenants for any
future date. The above waiver is limited to the compliance measured as to the
above covenants, as of March 31, 2000.

Sincerely,


/s/ Mark McMillan
Vice President
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02684-REB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF WHOLESALE

SPECIALTIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HURST & BURR MECHANICAL, INC.,

JE HURLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, and

JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER1

The matter is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion To Consolidate Pursuant To

D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1 [#5] filed November 16, 2011. The motion is DENIED without

prejudice for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A compliance.

Dated: November 17, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02684-REB-CBS Document 6 Filed 11/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1