alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02756–MSK–KMT

GREG WILKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC, 

Defendant.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

This matter comes before me sua sponte. To eschew the appearance of impropriety, I

conclude that I must recuse myself from this case.

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 455(a) provides, “(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the

United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might

reasonably be questioned.” See United States v. Pearson, 203 F.3d 1243, 1264 (10th Cir. 2000).

However, a “judge should not recuse himself on unsupported, irrational, or highly tenuous

speculation.” Hinman v. Rogers, 831 F.2d. 937, 939 (10th Cir. 1987).

One of my family members owns stock in Level 3 Communications. Under these

circumstances, the court’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. 

Case 1:11-cv-02756-MSK-BNB Document 7 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Therefore, it is ORDERED:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), I hereby RECUSE myself from all further involvement

in this case. The Clerk’s Office shall randomly draw and assign another Magistrate Judge to this

case.

It is further ORDERED

The Scheduling Conference current set for January 18, 2012 at 9:45 a.m. is VACATED.

Dated this 30th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02756-MSK-BNB Document 7 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Duffee, Appellant, *v.*Bankers’ Surety Company.

*Practice, Supreme Court*— Appeals—Paper *boohs*— Statement *of question involved*— Statement *of undue length*— Supreme *Court Bule No. SJf.*

Where the question involved in an appeal could have been adequately stated in two lines but occupied twenty nine lines, covering three-fourths of a page, in violation of Supreme Court Rule 34, the appeal was quashed.

Argued Oct. 20, 1914.

Appeal, No. 220, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. No. 4, Allegheny Co., First T., 1912, No. 166, on verdict for defendant in case of L. W. Duffee, for use of E. R. Cluley v. Bankers’ Surety Company and Mary Engel.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

*18*William A. McConnel,*with him *George H. Quaill,*for appellant.

*W. Clyde Grubbs,*with him *Stone & Stone,*for appellee.

January 2, 1915:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The narrow question involved in this appeal is whether an agent exceeded his authority under a written power of attorney. It could have been stated in two lines, but, instead of being so stated, twenty-nine lines, covering three-fourths of a page, are devoted to it, in the face of rule 34, which declares: “The statement of the question involved is designed to enable the court to obtain an immediate view of the nature of the controversy. It must state the question or questions in the briefest and most general terms, without names, dates, amounts or particulars of any kind whatever. It should not ordinarily exceed ten lines, and must not, under any circumstances, exceed half a page. This rule is to be regarded as in the highest degree mandatory and admitting of no exception.” For gross violation of the foregoing — to which the attention of counsel for appellant was called on the oral argument — this appeal must be quashed. Shortly after the adoption of the rule and frequently since notice has been given that, for disregard of it, counsel assume the risk of having their client’s cause defeated, not for want of merit, but by reason of a failure on their part to perform their duty: Van Sciver Company v. McPherson, 199 Pa. 331; Buckman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company, 232 Pa. 351. If we should fail in the present case to enforce this useful rule relating to the preparation of paper books, we might as well abolish it.

Appeal quashed.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1638 

To adjust the salaries of Federal justices and judges, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. REID, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To adjust the salaries of Federal justices and judges, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Judicial Salary 

5 Restoration Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF COMPENSATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the annual rate of salary of— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 1638 IS

1 (1) the judges of the district courts, as estab2 lished under section 132 of title 28, United States 

3 Code, shall be adjusted to $247,800; 

4 (2) the judges of the Court of International 

5 Trade, as established under section 251 of title 28, 

6 United States Code, shall be adjusted to $247,800; 

7 (3) the judges of the courts of appeals, as es8 tablished under section 44 of title 28, United States 

9 Code, shall be adjusted to $262,700; 

10 (4) the Associate Justices of the Supreme 

11 Court, as described under section 1 of title 28, 

12 United States Code, shall be adjusted to $304,500; 

13 and 

14 (5) the Chief Justice of the United States, as 

15 described under section 1 of title 28, United States 

16 Code, shall be adjusted to $318,200. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

18 on the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 

19 the date of enactment of this Act. 

20 SEC. 3. COORDINATION RULE. 

21 If a pay adjustment under section 2 is to be made 

22 for an office or position as of the same date that any other 

23 pay adjustment would take effect for such office or posi24 tion, the adjustment under this Act shall be made first. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•S 1638 IS

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

3 as necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1590 

To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2007 

Mr. BYRD (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE FOR FEDERAL 

4 ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

5 PROJECT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

7 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the project 

9 numbered 7307 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Com10 mission, the Commission shall, on the request of the liVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:26 Jun 12, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1590.IS S1590

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1590 IS

1 censee for the project, in accordance with that section (in2 cluding the good faith, due diligence, and public interest 

3 requirements of that section and procedures established 

4 under that section), extend the time required for com5 mencement of construction of the project until 24 months 

6 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

8 the project on the expiration of any extension, issued by 

9 the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power 

10 Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the time required for commence11 ment of construction of the project. 

12 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF TERMINATED LICENSE.—If 

13 a license of the Commission for the project has been termi14 nated before the date of enactment of this Act, the Com15 mission shall— 

16 (1) reinstate the license effective as of the date 

17 of the termination of the license; and 

18 (2) extend the time required for commencement 

19 of construction of the project until 24 months after 

20 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO CONTINUING 

JUDICIAL EDUCATION BOARD OF 

JUDGES

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 927

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of December, 2022, the Honorable Shawn C. Wagner, 

Adams County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Continuing Judicial Education 

Board of Judges for a term of three years, commencing December 31, 2022.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0359

ALL STAR PAINTING INC.,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 v.

DANIELLE JONES,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Michael B. Anderson, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this August 5, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: T. Thomas Singer, Ryan Shaffer, Robert Leonard Stepans, James Clarke 

Murnion, Haley Anne Nelson, Michael B. Anderson

08/05/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0359
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02669-REB-KLM

DELMAR WYATT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTURYLINK, INC, formerly known as Qwest Communications International , Inc.,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation For Dismissal [#30]1 filed April 5,

2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should

be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulation For Dismissal [#30] filed April 5, 2012, is APPROVED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for November 16, 2012, is

VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence December 3, 2012, is VACATED;

4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and

1 “[#30]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

Case 1:11-cv-02669-REB-KLM Document 31 Filed 04/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
5. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay

their own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated April 5, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

2

Case 1:11-cv-02669-REB-KLM Document 31 Filed 04/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 12
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (BEFORE 
FIXED CHARGES) TO COMBINED FIXED
CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK 
DIVIDENDS
(In thousands, except ratios)
(Unaudited)
  Nine MonthsEndedSeptember 30,
    
    

    Year Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Fixed charges
    
    $
    203,734
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924
    
    
    $
    164,994Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    15,192
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,256
    
    
    
    20,259
    
    
    
    20,273
    
    
    
    20,362Combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    218,926
    
    
    $
    255,777
    
    
    $
    127,165
    
    
    $
    65,198
    
    
    $
    79,197
    
    
    $
    185,356Fixed charges
    
    $
    203,734
    
    
    $
    235,521
    
    
    $
    106,909
    
    
    $
    44,939
    
    
    $
    58,924
    
    
    $
    164,994Income from continuing
operations
    
    
    8,853
    
    
    
    3,843
    
    
    
    17,195
    
    
    
    39,869
    
    
    
    58,666
    
    
    
    95,246$
    212,587
    
    
    $
    239,364
    
    
    $
    124,104
    
    
    $
    84,808
    
    
    $
    117,590
    
    
    $
    260,240Ratio of income from continuing
operations (before fixed
charges) to combined fixed
charges and preferred
stock dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30:1
    
    
    
    1.48:1
    
    
    
    1.40:1Deficiency of income from
continuing operations (before
fixed charges) to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock
dividends
    
    $
    6,339
    
    
    $
    16,413
    
    
    $
    3,061
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CAPSTEAD MORTGAGE CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 8, 2007
    By:
    /s/ ANDREW F. JACOBSAndrew F. JacobsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May 8, 2007
    By:
    /s/ PHILLIP A. REINSCHPhillip A. ReinschExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.2 (b)


Memorandum to OPERATING COMMITTEE 2000 PROFIT SHARING PLAN

December 20, 1999






I am modifying the "Operating Committee 2000 Profit Sharing Plan" pay-out
percentage for Jim Mason and Don Pyatt. The percentages will be modified from
0.20% to 0.18% for both Jim Mason and Don Pyatt.


                           /s/ John Doddridge
                           ------------------
                           John Doddridge
                           Chairman & CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: July 8, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Probation Officer: Katrina Devine

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Martha Paluch

Linda Kaufman

Plaintiff,

v.

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART, Paula Ray

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

11:37 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant is not present.

Statement from defense counsel as to defendant’s absence.

The Government orally moves for a bench warrant.

ORDER: The Government’s oral motion for a bench warrant is GRANTED.

11:39 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 2 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 306 filed 07/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
#### HOLLINGSWORTH v. BOCA RATON WRECKING CO. and Florida Industrial Commission.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 8, 2006*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.227 Proprietors Equity in Noncorporate Business** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED AS
PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              36
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (118)
<INVENTORY>                                         58
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,261
<PP&E>                                           8,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,013)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,692
<SALES>                                          2,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,602
<CGS>                                            2,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,095)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7165

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALONZO DAVID DABNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.

(CR-98-23, CA-00-752-7)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 6, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo David Dabney, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alonzo David Dabney appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Dabney, Nos. CR-98-23; CA-00-752-7

(W.D. Va. May 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 21.1

GASTAR EXPLORATION LTD.

Subsidiary List  December 31, 2008

100% Subsidiaries owned of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (Alberta, Canada)

Gastar Exploration USA, Inc. (Michigan)

100% Subsidiaries owned of Gastar Exploration USA, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration New South Wales, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration Victoria, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration Texas LP (Delaware) (1)(2)

Gastar Power Pty Ltd. (Australia)



|(1) | Gastar Exploration Texas LLC (Delaware), General Partner (1%)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Gastar Exploration Texas, Inc. (Michigan), Limited Partner (99%)
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11


                       CARVER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended
                                                     March 31,
                                              1997             1996
                                             -----------   ----------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>        
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
  NET LOSS                                   $(1,081,000)  $ (385,000)
                                             -----------   ----------

  Weighted average number of
    shares outstanding                         3,754,062    3,686,830

  Add shares issuable from the
    assumed exercise of options and                  *            *
    warrants
                                           -------------   ----------
  Add shares issuable from the
    assumed conversion of                            *            *
    preferred shares
                                           -------------   ----------
  Weighted average number of shares
    outstanding, as adjusted                   3,754,062    3,686,830
                                           -------------   ----------

LOSS PER SHARE                             $       (0.29)  $    (0.10)
                                           =============   ==========

</TABLE>

*Excluded as the effect on loss per share is antidilutive

                                      14
Case 1:11-cv-02701-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02701-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02701-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 17, 2010 | /s/      Shi Huashan                                                            |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Shi      HuashanChief      Executive Officer (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----