alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Mark Andre, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
        of his
        knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
        to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
 By:
                  /s/ Mark
                  AndreMark Andre
                  Chief Executive Officer
                  March
                      28, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02564-CMA-KMT

GLOBAL CELLULAR, INC., a Georgia corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and the Stipulated

Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15) signed by the attorneys for the parties hereto, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and cause of action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, each party to pay its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of November.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02564-CMA-KMT Document 17 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
                                                                 Exhibit 12

                       ENRON CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                               FIXED CHARGES
                           (Dollars in Millions)
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                    Nine Months
                                       Ended             Year Ended December 31,
                                      9/30/99     1998    1997    1996      1995    1994

<S>                                   <C>        <C>      <C>    <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings available for fixed charges
 Net income before cumulative
  effect of accounting changes        $  765     $  703   $105   $  584   $  520   $  453
 Less:
   Undistributed earnings and
    losses of less than 50% owned
    affiliates                           (19)       (44)   (89)     (39)     (14)      (9)
   Capitalized interest of
    nonregulated companies               (51)       (66)   (16)     (10)      (8)      (9)
 Add:
   Fixed charges(a)                      776        809    674      454      436      487
   Minority interests                     94         77     80       75       27       30
   Income tax expense                     99        204    (65)     297      310      190
     Total                            $1,664     $1,683   $689   $1,361   $1,271   $1,142

Fixed Charges
 Interest expense(a)                  $  740     $  760   $624   $  404   $  386   $  445
 Rental expense representative
  of interest factor                      36         49     50       50       50       42
     Total                            $  776     $  809   $674   $  454   $  436   $  487

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      2.14       2.08   1.02     3.00     2.92     2.34

<FN>
(a) Amounts exclude costs incurred on sales of accounts receivables.


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02470-BNB

KEITH C. BROOKS, JR.,

Applicant,

v.

ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, Limon Correctional Facility, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, 

Respondents.

ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE

As part of the preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in this case, the Court has determined that a

limited Pre-Answer Response is appropriate. Respondents are directed pursuant to

Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts

and to Denson v. Abbott, 554 F.Supp. 2d 1206 (D. Colo. 2008), to file a Pre-Answer

Response limited to addressing the affirmative defenses of timeliness under 28 U.S.C. §

2244(d) and/or exhaustion of state court remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). If

Respondents do not intend to raise either of these affirmative defenses, they must notify

the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response. Respondents may not file a

dispositive motion as their Pre-Answer Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address

the merits of the claims in response to this Order.

 In support of the Pre-Answer Response, Respondents should attach as exhibits

all relevant portions of the state court record, including but not limited to copies of all

documents demonstrating whether this action is filed in a timely manner and/or whether

Case 1:11-cv-02470-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Applicant has exhausted state court remedies.

Applicant may reply to the Pre-Answer Response and provide any information

that might be relevant to the one-year limitation period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)

and/or the exhaustion of state court remedies. Applicant also should include

information relevant to equitable tolling, specifically as to whether he has pursued his

claims diligently and whether some extraordinary circumstance prevented him from

filing a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action in this Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of this Order

Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response that complies with this Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the filing of the PreAnswer Response Applicant may file a Reply, if he desires. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Respondents do not intend to raise either of the

affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state court remedies, they must

notify the Court of that decision in the Pre-Answer Response.

DATED November 21, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02470-LTB Document 7 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of BMR Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
K. John Shukur, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BMR Solutions, Inc., and will be retained by BMR Solutions, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




/s/
      K. John ShukurK.
      John Shukur
                Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                  March
      28, 2008
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant



|                                                                                         |  |                                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         | 
|1.      KT Services, Inc.100% owned subsidiaryIncorporated in the State of Washington    |  | 2.      Key Tronic Juarez, SA de CV100% owned subsidiaryIncorporated in Mexico                                    
|                                                                                         | 
|3.      Key Tronic China LTD100% owned subsidiaryIncorporated in the State of Washington |  | 4.      Key Tronic Computer Peripherals (Shanghai) Co. LTD 100% owned
subsidiary Incorporated in Republic of
China
|                                                                                         | 
|5.      Key Tronic Reynosa, S.A. de CV100% owned subsidiaryIncorporated in Mexico        |  |
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5


                                  PFSweb, Inc.
                          500 North Central Expressway
                                 Plano, TX 75074

                                     [date]

[name of Executive]
c/o 500 North Central Expressway
Plano, TX 75074

Dear [name]:

         This will confirm our agreement regarding that certain Executive
Severance Agreement (the "Agreement") dated [date] between you (the "Executive")
and PFSweb, Inc. (the "Company"). Effective as of the date hereof, the Agreement
is hereby amended as follows:

         The definition of "Qualifying Termination" is amended by adding the
following thereto:

         "In addition, a "Qualifying Termination" shall be deemed to occur if
(a) the Executive shall serve as a member of the Board, and (i) upon the
expiration of the Executive's term of office as such member, the Board (or any
nominating committee of the Board) shall determine not to, or shall fail to,
re-nominate the Executive to serve as a member of the Board (unless the
Executive shall consent thereto) other than in connection with a Termination for
Cause or (ii) in accordance with the Company's bylaws, the Board shall approve
the removal of the Executive as a member of the Board, other than in connection
with a Termination for Cause, or (b) the Board shall authorize and approve a
material and adverse change in the Executive's position, title and office(unless
the Executive shall consent thereto); provided, however, the foregoing shall not
apply if the Executive shall serve as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board, and the Board shall determine that such Executive shall continue to
serve as Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board, but shall not
serve as Chairman, as the result of (i) any change in law, rule, regulation or
listing standard of the primary securities exchange upon which the Company's
common stock is then traded restricting or prohibiting the holding of both
offices by one individual or requiring disclosure as to the reason why the Board
believes the holding of both offices by one individual is appropriate or (ii)
the public announcement by two or more of the leading providers of proxy voting
and corporate governance services that they will recommend withholding votes or
casting negative votes at annual shareholder meetings of companies whose offices
of chief executive officer and chairman are held by the same individual."

         Please acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing in the space
provided below.


                                             Very truly yours,


                                             PFSweb, Inc.


                                             By:
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:
                                                 Title:


Agreed:



-----------------------
Executive
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
                         Independent Auditors' Consent





The Board of Directors
Ciprico Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
2-89276, 2-96358, 33-5746, 33-14466, 33-47840, 33-78116, 33-64999, 33-65001,
333-02931 and 333-02933) on Form S-8 of Ciprico Inc. of our report dated
November 6, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Ciprico Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1996, which
report appears in the September 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Ciprico Inc.




                                               /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 17, 1996
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6892

JAMES WALLACE FOX , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BRICK TRIPP; US PAROLE COMMISSION , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:16

- hc

- 02127

- FL )

Submitted : November 28, 2017 Decided: January 5 , 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. James Wallace Fox, Appellant Pro Se. Roberto Francisco Ramirez, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee s . Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Wallace Fox , a District of Columbia Code offender, see ks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable un less a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012) ; Wilson v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 652 F.3d 348, 351

- 52 (3d Cir. 2011); Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306, 1308 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. A certifi cate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reas onable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently revie wed the record and conclude that Fox has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Roger Woodward, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 24Holdings Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  May 23, 2005


By:  /s/ Roger Woodward
     ------------------------------------------------
     Name:    Roger Woodward
     Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending June 12, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodHAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.                                                                                          CICCarlyle Financial Services Harbor, L.P., Washington, D.C.; CGFSP Coinvestment, L.P., Carlyle Global Partner Master Coinvestment Cayman, L.P., Carlyle Global Financial Services Partners, L.P., TCG Financial Services, L.P., Carlyle Financial Services, Ltd, TC Group Cayman Investment Holdings, L.P., TCG Holdings Cayman II, L.P., DBD Cayman, Limited, TCG Financial Services Investment Holdings, L.P., and Carlyle Financial Services Holdings, Ltd, all of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands; Daniel A. D' Aniello, William E. Conway , Jr., and David  M. Rubenstein, all of Washington, D.C.; and Carlyle Investment Management, L.L.C., TC Group, L.L.C., and TCG Holdings, L.L.C., all of Wilmington, Delaware, to acquire up to 24.9% of the voting shares of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., Norfolk, Virginia.Newspaper: 06/17/2010Federal Register: 06/22/2010HAMPTON ROADS BANKSHARES, INC.                                                                                          CICACMO-HR, L.L.C., New York, New York; Anchorage Capital Master Offshore, Ltd., ACPO Master, L.P., Anchorage Capital Partners Offshore, Ltd, and ACPO Master, Ltd, all of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands; Anchorage Capital Partners, L.P., Anchorage Advisors, L.L.C., Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C., Anchorage Capital Management, L.L.C., and Anchorage Advisors Management, L.L.C., all of Wilmington, Delaware; Kevin Ulrich and Anthony Davis, both of New York, New York, to acquire up to 24.9% of the voting shares of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc., Norfolk, Virginia.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 06/25/2010JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.                                                                                              * 3A5Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of Atlantic BancGroup, Inc., Jacksonville Beach, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Oceanside Bank, Jacksonville Beach, Florida.Newspaper: 06/30/2010Federal Register: 07/02/2010
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that:

(i) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Mark A. Hoppe                                           
|                    |  | Mark A. Hoppe President and
Chief Executive Officer         
|                    | 
|Dated: May 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Randall T. Conte                                        
|                    |  | Randall T. Conte Chief
Operating and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and will be retained by Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.