alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James W. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of Ciprico Inc., certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K of Ciprico Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known tous particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: December 6, 2005 | Signature: | /s/ James W. Hansen     |
|-------------------------|------------|-------------------------|
|                    |       | James W. Hansen         |
|                    |       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,708
<SECURITIES>                                     9,715
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                      1,418
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,197
<PP&E>                                          13,176
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,455
<SALES>                                          5,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,156
<CGS>                                            1,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                       485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7285

MICHAEL W. OWENS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-773-1) Submitted: October 27, 2004 Decided: November 5, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael W. Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael W. Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owens has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Owens’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6206

RICHARD WADE KENDRICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID T. PASTORS; JEFF N. DILLMAN; JEFFERSON

AREA COMMUNITY DIVISION INCENTIVE PROGRAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-96-6-R)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Wade Kendrick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Kendrick v. Pastors, No. CA-96-6-R (W.D. Va. Jan 5, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERROL WILEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 483 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              250,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                43,783
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           216,510
<PP&E>                                      22,692
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,561,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      491,975
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 483,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,561,832
<SALES>                                     76,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           358,012
<CGS>                                      114,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              413,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,152
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATIONS**
  I, George
Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
  4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  Date: May
5, 2005
 
 By:/s/
      George Schilling
      George
      Schilling
      President
      and Chief Executive Officer
II 

Calendar No. 172 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1327 

To create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. 

INOUYE, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BROWN, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. NELSON of 

Nebraska, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 24, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

A BILL 

To create and extend certain temporary district court 

judgeships. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS FOR DISTRICT 

4 COURTS. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, 

7 by and with the advice and consent of the Senate— 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 1327 RS

1 (A) 1 additional district judge for the east2 ern district of California; and 

3 (B) 1 additional district judge for the dis4 trict of Nebraska. 

5 (2) VACANCIES NOT FILLED.—The first va6 cancy in the office of district judge in each of the 

7 offices of district judge authorized by this sub8 section, occurring 10 years or more after the con9 firmation date of the judge named to fill the tem10 porary district judgeship created in the applicable 

11 district by this subsection, shall not be filled. 

12 (b) EXTENSION OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY JUDGE13 SHIPS.—Section 203(c) of the Judicial Improvements Act 

14 of 1990 (Public Law 101–650; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘the 

17 district of Hawaii,’’ after ‘‘Pennsylvania,’’; 

18 (2) in the third sentence (relating to the district 

19 of Kansas), by striking ‘‘16 years’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘26 years’’; 

21 (3) in the fifth sentence (relating to the north22 ern district of Ohio), by striking ‘‘15 years’’ and in23 serting ‘‘25 years’’; and 

24 (4) by inserting ‘‘The first vacancy in the office 

25 of district judge in the district of Hawaii occurring 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

S 1327 RS

1 20 years or more after the confirmation date of the 

2 judge named to fill the temporary judgeship created 

3 under this subsection shall not be filled.’’ after the 

4 sixth sentence. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Calendar No. 172 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1327 

A BILL 

To create and extend certain temporary district 

court judgeships. 

MAY 24, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
IN THE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

RONNIE DWAYNE SANDERS

VS. CAUSE NO. 05-98-00323-CR

STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER

On this 6th day of July, 2000, came on to be considered the appellant's pro se motion

to file an out-of-time pro se petition for discretionary review.

AND SUCH MOTION is hereby denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A TRUE COPY ATTEST:

Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

Faye Koenig/ Deputy Clerk

PER CURIAM

n
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 363 filed 01/27/14 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 363 filed 01/27/14 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133057 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133057 

 COA: 270821 

Wayne CC: 92-007467

ROBERT LEE GARRETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 23.1
                                  ------------






                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  in the  Registration  Statements  on Form  S-8  (Nos.  033-53524,  as
amended,  and  333-69057) and in the related  Prospectuses,  of our report dated
August 30, 2005 related to the financial  statements of Dynatronics  Corporation
included in its Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.





/s/ TANNER LC





Salt Lake City, Utah
September 28, 2005
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0359
STORM SMITH,

Petitioner,
v. CAPTAIN HASH, MISSOULA COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY,

Respondent.' 

### JUN 1 1 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Storm Smith petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief, indicating illegal incarceration. Herequests as reliefthat "[t]his Court conduct a speedy trial on [his] current criminal case or direct the lower court to do so." Smith is currently held in the Missoula County Detention Facility. Smith states he was arrested for misdemeanor partner or family member assault (PFMA) on October 18, 2023, and that he was released the next day on his own recognizance (O/R). Less than a week later, Smith was charged with felony PFMA. On February 12, 2024, he adds that he had a GPS bracelet placed on him as part of a drug treatment program. Smith further provides that he was returned to custody on April 5, 2024. Smith puts forth that, due to the GPS bracelet placement restricting his freedom, he has "been in, constant custody since [October] 18, 2023." He argues that if he were financially abletopost bond,thenhe"would nothavebeenplacedintherestrictiveposition he was placed in, via [an] ankle bracelet." He contends that his pre-trial delay is unconstitutionally prolonged. We secured a copy oftheMissoula County District Court's docket sheet. The court initially set bond at $50,000 with the issuance ofthe arrest warrant on October 24, 2023, for the felony PFMA. After being released in January 2024, the court issued a bench warrant and increased the bond amount to $100,000. The warrant was served on April 8, 2024. 06/11/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0359Smith's issues arenotremediedby awrit ofhabeas corpus. Hehasnot demonstrated

want of bail, pursuant to § 46-22-103, MCA, because the District Court imposed bond twice. Smith's claims concerning the length of his custody and pretrial delay are more appropriately raised in an appeal after he receives a conviction and sentence. See State v. Wright, 2001MT282, ¶¶ 13, 37, 307Mont.349, 42 P.3d 349 (a direct appeal istheremedy to challenge a conviction and sentence). Smith's temedy is not with this Court. This Court is not a fact-finding court nor do we conduct trials. The cause ofhis incarceration is his pending criminal case. Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Commirs, 236 Mont. 261, 261-262, 766 P.2d 884, 884-885 (1988). Smith has not demonstrated illegal incarceration, and he is not entitled to habeas corpus relief. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Smith's Petition for Writ ofHabeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the Honorable John W. Larson, District Court Judge; Amy McGhee, Clerk ofDistrict Court, under Cause No. DC 23-656, and for distributiontothe counsel ofrecordthere;CaptainHash;counsel ofrecord, and Storm Smith persontl itl , DATED this thy ofJune, 2024.

2 ChiefJustice

X?"Ce_ le 

# &2r 2:Lb_a_AA3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                                   0 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,277,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,020,000 
<INVENTORY>                                      5,972,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,627,000 
<PP&E>                                             279,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      74,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,183,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,497,000 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                            44,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,642,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,183,000 
<SALES>                                         61,505,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,505,000 
<CGS>                                           58,411,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,411,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,024,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 284,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,436,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (27,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,463,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,463,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.55)
                                               


</TABLE>