##### Table of Contents

---



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A



(Mark One)

|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the fiscal year ended: November 30, 2004



OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For the transition period from             to



Commission file number: 0-11868



CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|California                                                     |  | 95-3533362                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|6175 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, California                  |  | 92121                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          



Registrants
telephone number, including area code: (858) 535-0202



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value

(Title of
Class)



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1)
has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  xNo ̈



Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Form 10-K/A or any amendment to this Form 10-K/A.    x



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).    Yes  x    No ̈



The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and non-voting
common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $269,704,000 based on the average bid and asked price of such Common Stock, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter
as reported for such date on the Nasdaq Stock Market. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of Common Stock held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and shares held by directors and officers of the registrant
have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.



At February 15, 2005, 48,773,239 shares of registrants Common Stock were outstanding.



Documents Incorporated by Reference: None



---



---

##### Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE



CardioDynamics International Corporation is filing this amendment to Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2004, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2005 (Original Filing) in accordance with the Commissions Exemptive Order # 34-50754, to:



| |  |  | include a Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm relating to our internal control over financial reporting,
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amend and restate Item 9A to include Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to include a revised Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm required as a result of the revisions discussed above.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



As a result of these amendments, the certifications pursuant to Section 302
and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed as exhibits to the Original Filing, have been re-executed and re-filed as of the date of this Form 10-K/A.



TABLE OF CONTENTS





|            |  |                                   |  |                                                                                                |  |   
|----------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|Part I      |  | Item 1                            |  | Business                                                                                       |  | 3 
|            |  | Item 2                            |  | Properties                                                                                     |  | 23
|            |  | Item 3                            |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                              |  | 23
|            |  | Item 4                            |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                            |  | 23
|            |  |                                   |  | Executive Officers of the Registrant                                                           |  | 24
|Part II     |  | Item 5                            |  | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters                          |  | 26
|            |  | Item 6                            |  | Selected Financial Data                                                                        |  | 27
|            |  | Item 7                            |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations          |  | 28
|            |  | Item 7A                           |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                     |  | 39
|            |  | Item 8                            |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                    |  | 40
|            |  | Item 9                            |  | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure           |  | 67
|            |  | Item 9A                           |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                        |  | 67
|Part III    |  | Item 10                           |  | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.                                            |  | 71
|            |  | Item 11                           |  | Executive Compensation                                                                         |  | 73
|            |  | Item 12                           |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |  | 80
|            |  | Item 13                           |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                                                 |  | 82
|            |  | Item 14                           |  | Principal Accounting Fees and Services                                                         |  | 82
|Part IV     |  | Item 15                           |  | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K                               |  | 84
|Schedule II |  | Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |  | 87                                                                                            
|Signatures  |  |                                   |  | 88                                                                                            



2



---

##### Table of Contents

This Form 10-K/A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include statements regarding our plans, goals, strategies, intent, beliefs or current expectations. These statements are expressed in good faith and
based upon reasonable assumptions when made, but there can be no assurance that these expectations will be achieved or accomplished. Sentences in this document containing verbs such as plan, intend, anticipate,
target, estimate, expect, and the like, and/or future tense or conditional constructions (will, may, could, should, etc.) constitute forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Items contemplating, or making assumptions about, actual or potential future sales, market size, collaborations, trends or operating results also constitute such forward-looking statements. These statements are only
predictions and actual results could differ materially. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, including the section entitled Risk Factors in this Form 10-K/A
document. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date we made the statement, and we do not undertake to update the disclosures contained in this document or reflect events or circumstances that occur subsequently or the occurrence of
unanticipated events.



PART I



|ITEM 1. | BUSINESS
|------- | --------



CardioDynamics International Corporation (CardioDynamics or the Company) is the innovator and market leader of an important
medical technology called Impedance Cardiography (ICG). We develop, manufacture and market noninvasive ICG diagnostic and monitoring technologies and electrocardiograph (ECG) electrode sensors.



Our proprietary and patented ICG technology noninvasively monitors the
hearts ability to deliver blood to the body. Our systems provide 12 hemodynamic (blood flow) parameters, the most significant of which is cardiac output, or the amount of blood pumped by the heart each minute. Our lead product, the BioZ® ICG Monitor (previously known as the BioZ.com®), has received 510(k) clearance by the U.S. Federal
Drug Administration (FDA) and carries the CE mark, which is a required certification of essential environmental and safety compliance by the European Community for sale of electronic equipment. We sell to physicians and hospitals in the United
States through our own direct sales force and distribute our products to domestic and targeted international markets through a network of distributors. In November 1998, Health Care Finance Administration (HCFA), now known as the Center for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS), mandated Medicare reimbursement for our BioZ® procedures and, in January 2001, implemented national uniform pricing throughout the United States. To date, we have sold over 3,800 ICG systems to over 2,900 physician offices and hospital sites throughout the world.



The Company was incorporated as a California corporation in
June 1980 and changed its name to CardioDynamics International Corporation in October 1993. On March 22, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities (the Acquired Assets) of the
Vermed Division (Vermed) of Vermont Medical, Inc. Vermed is a manufacturer of electrodes and related supplies used in electrocardiograms and other diagnostic procedures for cardiology, electrotherapy, sleep testing, neurology and general
purpose diagnostic testing. On June 2, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of 80% of all outstanding shares of Medis Medizinische Messtechnik GmbH (Medis). Medis is a manufacturer of diagnostic and monitoring devices, which uses
ICG technology for cardiovascular diagnostics sold internationally.



Our products help physicians assess, diagnose, and treat patients with heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and those who are short of breath. It is estimated that there are over 5 million heart failure patients in the United
States and over 65 million patients with high blood pressure.



Electrocardiography (ECG) is a widely used noninvasive process to assess the electrical characteristics of the heart. Our ICG technology noninvasively quantifies the mechanical functioning of the heart. Conditions



3



---

##### Table of Contents

related to the improper mechanical functioning of the heart include hypertension, congestive heart failure, pulmonary disease, high-risk pregnancy and kidney
dysfunction. Our technology complements ECG and supplements information obtained through the five vital signsheart rate, respiration rate, body temperature, blood pressure and oxygen saturationquickly, safely and cost effectively.



Currently, the primary method used to measure hemodynamic
parameters is pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC), which is an invasive procedure that requires insertion of a catheter (plastic tube) into the heart itself. Complications associated with this procedure occur in as many as one in four reported
cases and typically include irregular heartbeats or infection, but in some cases, pulmonary artery rupture or even death.



Because of the high risk of complications, physicians generally prescribe PAC only for critically ill patients. In the non-sterile environment of a
physicians office or outpatient clinic, PAC is simply unavailable. As a result, in the majority of situations, a physician seeking to assess hemodynamics normally must do so through indirect means, such as by measuring blood pressure, checking
the pulse, looking at neck veins and employing subjective examination techniques that are prone to human error. A compelling need exists for objective, noninvasive measurement tools, such as our BioZ® ICG Systems.



During ICG monitoring using our BioZ ICG Systems, an undetectable electrical signal is sent through our proprietary sensors
placed on the patients neck and chest. Our DISQ® (Digital Impedance Signal Quantifier) processing and Z MARC® Algorithm analyze and record significant hemodynamic parameters. Based on this data, a physician can quickly and safely identify underlying cardiovascular disorder, assess and diagnose, customize and target
treatment, monitor the effectiveness of prescribed medications and more accurately identify potential complications.



Our objective is to fundamentally change drug management and make a genuine contribution to healthcare economics with our noninvasive technologies. Key
elements of our strategy include efforts to:



| |  |  | aggressively market and sell ICG products through our direct and distributor sales force;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | broaden our product offerings and distribution channels through strategic relationships;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | grow recurring revenue through increased use of our proprietary disposable sensors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | expand evidence of our technologys validity and clinical application in our target markets;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | maintain market leadership through product improvements and extensions; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | target new market opportunities through acquisition and technology development.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Investors wishing to obtain more information about CardioDynamics may access our annual, quarterly and other reports and
information filed with the SEC. Investors can read and copy any information we have filed with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation
of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC, including us. We also maintain an Internet site (www.cdic.com) where we make available, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and any
amendments to those reports, as well as Section 16 filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this annual
report on Form 10-K/A.



Industry Overview and Company History



Our proprietary technology provides medical professionals
in the hospital and physicians office with noninvasive access to objective patient data to effectively assess, diagnose and treat congestive heart failure and hypertension and to evaluate emergency, pacemaker and dialysis patients.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

In the hospital setting, the BioZ is a noninvasive, cost-effective and safe alternative to the invasive
PAC procedure and may also be used in many situations in which PAC is not feasible. However, the advantages of our proprietary technology are not limited to the hospital or the critically ill. We believe that the greatest current potential for the
BioZ product line lies in the use of noninvasive hemodynamic measurements in the physician office. We believe that the worldwide market opportunity is over five billion dollars for our BioZ product line.



We envision expanding the domestic market from the current 2 million annual
invasive PAC procedures to over 72 million annual noninvasive ICG procedures, as summarized in the chart below. Assuming total worldwide procedures are approximately double those in the United States, there would be over 140 million procedures
worldwide. These figures do not include home healthcare monitoring, which we believe could, if implemented, significantly increase demand for our technology.



Potential Annual Noninvasive Monitoring Procedures

Patients in the United States



|                         |  |             |  |                                              |  |                       
|------------------------ |  | ----------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Disease State            |  | US Patients |  | Potential AnnualMonitoringProcedures/Patient |  | Total AnnualProcedures
|Congestive heart failure |  | 5,000,000   |  | 4.0                                          |  | 20,000,000            
|Hypertension             |  | 50,000,000  |  | 0.5                                          |  | 25,000,000            
|Emergency departments    |  | 20,000,000  |  | 1.0                                          |  | 20,000,000            
|Pacemaker                |  | 1,100,000   |  | 2.0                                          |  | 2,200,000             
|Dialysis                 |  | 450,000     |  | 12.0                                         |  | 5,400,000             
|TOTAL                    |  |             |  |                                              |  | 72,600,000            



Strategy



Our objective is to fundamentally change patient care and make a genuine
contribution to healthcare economics with our noninvasive technologies. Our objective will be achieved if and when noninvasive ICG technology becomes the Sixth Vital Sign, just as oxygen saturation became the fifth vital sign in the
late-1980s. We intend to position BioZ ICG technology as a key diagnostic and monitoring tool for assessing and treating congestive heart failure, hypertension, pacemaker, emergency, critically ill, surgical, high-risk obstetric, dialysis and home
healthcare. Our corporate strategy includes:



Aggressively
market and sell ICG products through our direct and distributor sales force.



We intend to leverage our direct sales force to capitalize on our first-to-market position in the United States to further penetrate the physician office market. We believe that a strong direct sales force
supplemented by our clinical application specialists are best suited to educate the medical community about how our technology can improve patient outcomes and decrease costs. We currently have 52 domestic direct sales representatives who sell our
products, as well as 6 regional managers, 1 national sales trainer, and a vice president of sales. In addition, we have 23 clinical application specialists and a national clinical applications manager to supplement our field sales team by enhancing
customer understanding, usage and satisfaction. By improving device utilization, we believe we can strengthen customer loyalty and increase recurring revenue from our proprietary sensors.



Broaden our distribution channels through strategic relationships.



We intend to establish strategic relationships with major patient monitoring
and diagnostic cardiology companies, pacemaker manufacturers and other medical products and technology companies to increase the availability of our proprietary technology. We believe that strategic relationships can accelerate market penetration of
BioZ ICG technology in markets not served by our direct sales team and provide us with access to the large installed bases of patient monitoring, cardiology and other complementary medical equipment.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

Grow recurring revenue through increased use of our proprietary disposable sensors.



During fiscal 2000, we successfully developed and received FDA 510(k)
clearance on our patented BioZtect® sensor
technology that provides notable improvements in performance and features. Its unique shape and chemical composition, adhesion characteristics and more user-friendly design optimize signal transmission and detection sensitivity. The new ICG sensor
and cable system has a proprietary interface, which promotes the exclusive use of our sensors with our ICG equipment. During fiscal 2004, we acquired Vermed, an ECG electrode manufacturer that accounted for 16% of our net sales in 2004. As our
installed base of BioZ products grows, and our ECG sensor business grows, we expect that the disposable sensor revenue stream could account for more than half of our total net sales within the next several years.



Expand evidence of the technologys validity and clinical application
in our target markets.



While a significant amount of
evidence substantiating ICGs validity and clinical application is now available, we will continue to invest in supporting clinical trials to further expand this evidence and provide prospective customers with data regarding the efficacy of
ICG. Several multi-center clinical trials including studies in outpatient heart failure (PREDICT) and emergency department shortness of breath (ED-IMPACT) were released in 2004. A multi-center trial in hypertension (CONTROL) is expected to be
released in 2005.



Maintain market leadership through
product improvements and extensions.



We intend to advance
the development of our core algorithms to provide physicians with improved cardiac function measurement capabilities on a broad class of patients. We believe that continued advances in our ICG technology will increase physician usage and loyalty and
strengthen our industry position. We will capitalize on our expertise in ICG signal processing and sensor technology to improve system performance in the presence of signal noise and patient movement thereby leading to additional applications for
cardiovascular disease management.



In 2001, we released the
BioZ® ICG Module for the GE Medical Systems
Information Technologies (GEMS-IT) bedside monitoring systems. This product is distributed worldwide by GEMS-IT for their Solar® 7000, 8000, 8000M, and DASH 3000, 4000 patient monitors. In July 2002, we signed a Co-Development and OEM Agreement with Philips Medical Systems, a
division of Royal Philips Electronics (Philips), a worldwide leader in clinical measurement and diagnostic solutions for the healthcare industry. CardioDynamics and Philips are actively working on the BioZ Dx ICG Diagnostics device, which was
released in the beginning of 2005. When the BioZ Dx incorporates ECG measurements, expected by the end of 2005, Philips has the right to purchase ICG modules from us and sell the combined ECG/ICG product in their key markets.



Target new market opportunities through acquisitions of complementary
technologies and technology development.



In 2004, we
acquired two companies, Medis (a German ICG device design and manufacturer) and Vermed (a Vermont-based electrode manufacturer). The Medis acquisition strengthens our core ICG technology development capabilities and provides us with a European
partner for market development opportunities in that region. The Vermed acquisition provides vertical integration of our disposable sensor business, protecting and increasing the margin on that revenue source.



We will continue to focus on new applications for our core technology.
Advances in ICG technology could be applied in the areas of pacemaker optimization, fluid management (including dialysis), oncology, drug noncompliance, and pharmaceutical development and testing. Pharmaceutical companies such as GlaxoSmithKline,
Eli Lilly and Co. and Pfizer Inc. are currently using our technology to document the cardiovascular effects of their pharmaceutical agents in both animals and humans.



Continued innovation and commercialization of new proprietary products are essential elements in our long-term growth
strategy. We intend to maintain our competitive advantage by acquiring complementary technologies and additional patents and other proprietary rights, as we deem appropriate.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

ICG Technology



While ECG technology noninvasively measures the hearts electrical characteristics, our ICG technology makes it possible to measure the
hearts mechanical, or blood flow, characteristics. By using our products, physicians have an easy, noninvasive, safe, painless and cost-effective way to monitor the hearts ability to deliver blood to the body.



In order to measure this conductivity change, our BioZ products use four dual
sensors (two on the neck and two on the chest) to deliver a high frequency (70 kHz), low magnitude (4 mA), alternating current through the chest that is not felt by the patient. Our BioZ ICG Monitor uses proprietary DISQ® processing which measures the changes in impedance to the electrical signal.
The changes in impedance are then applied to the Z MARC® Algorithm to provide stroke volume, the volume of blood pumped with each heartbeat. Additional parameters that are provided include those indicating blood flow from the heart, the resistance the heart is pumping
against, the force the heart is contracting, and the amount of fluid in the chest. These parameters are printed on a report that allows the doctor to customize and optimize treatment for a particular patient.



Some physical and medical conditions may diminish the accuracy of the
measurements provided by our products; therefore, use of our BioZ ICG products in such cases is not appropriate. We believe that inaccuracies are most likely to occur in patients who are experiencing severe septic shock, severe aortic valve
regurgitation, severe irregular ventricular heartbeats or heart rates greater than 180 beats per minute. In addition, there is inadequate data demonstrating the accuracy of our products in patients who are shorter than 47 inches or who weigh less
than 66 pounds or more than 342 pounds, as well as in patients who move excessively during the BioZ procedure.



Our Products



Pricing



Our products have established list
prices and we discount the list prices of our products in some circumstances based primarily upon volume commitments or seasonal promotions. We also provide discounts on the purchase of refurbished equipment and to distributors who perform sales and
customer service functions for us.



Products



We focus our business on two principal operating segments: Impedance
Cardiography (ICG) and Electrocardiography (ECG) described below:



·ICG SegmentThe principal products in the ICG segment consists of the following:



BioZ® ICG Monitor



Our lead noninvasive cardiac function monitoring device, the BioZ® ICG Monitor, features a portable design, transportable battery and integrated
blood pressure. BioZ ICG Monitors are sold with a pole cart, printer and keyboard for end user data entry and include a standard five-year warranty.



In December 2004, we received FDA 510(k) clearance on the BioZ Dx. The BioZ Dx has significant signal processing improvements and future 12-lead ECG
capability. It also features an integrated full-page thermal printer, color display screen, and a new reporting function that allows physicians to automatically compare a patients last ICG report to the current ICG report. Commercial shipments
of the BioZ Dx commenced in the first quarter of 2005.



BioZ® ICG Module



The BioZ ICG Module was jointly developed with GEMS-IT. The module
integrates our proprietary BioZ ICG technology into GEs Solar®and DASH patient
monitoring systems.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

BioZtect® Sensors



We market disposable sensors designed specifically for use with our BioZ® products. Four of our patented dual sensors are used in each monitoring session. Our proprietary sensor and cable
systems provide enhanced features to our customers and promote the exclusive use of our proprietary sensors with our equipment.



Niccomo ICG Monitor



The Medis Niccomo ICG monitor is sold through Medis outside the United States and incorporates a color touch screen and integrated strip printer. Medis
also manufactures and sells the Cardioscreen and Rheoscreen product lines of venous blood flow products.



·ECG segmentThe principal product in the ECG segment consists of the following:



ECG Electrodes



Vermed manufactures and markets a large number of ECG electrodes for
resting, stress, and ambulatory applications. They also manufacture private label ECG electrodes for distributors and medical device companies.



Sales and Distribution



We view the United States medical marketplace as two distinct segments: the outpatient market and the hospital market. In the outpatient market, we target
physician offices and hospital-based and freestanding outpatient facilities for our stand-alone BioZ® products through our direct sales force and distributors. In 2004, we initiated distributor sales efforts with Physician Sales and Service (PSS) and Caligor Medical (Henry Schein, Inc.).
In contrast to the hospital market, there are few, if any, formal capital equipment budget processes and purchasing decisions can therefore be made more quickly. Consequently, our direct and distributor sales force is focused primarily on the
outpatient markets.



We continue to believe that the hospital
market represents a large and viable market for our products. In 2004, we piloted a program targeted to increase hospital market penetration. We may expand this program in 2005 by employing direct sales representatives to focus on this segment of
the market.



Internationally, we sell our products through
local medical distributors. Currently, we have distribution partners and end-users in more than 30 countries around the world. Additionally, our international sales team supports GEMS-IT sales teams in selling our ICG Module that interfaces with the
GEMS-IT Solar and DASH monitoring systems. We do not offer product return rights to our distributors.



Strategic Relationships



During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, we entered into an agreement with GE Medical Systems (GEMS-IT) for the development of a custom plug-in module for the GEMS-IT Solar® and DASH series of bedside monitors. This product was introduced to the market in June
2001 and extends the capabilities of the GEMS-IT Solar product family to provide all of the hemodynamic parameters of the BioZ ICG Monitor to GEMS-ITs installed customer base of over 30,000 units. This product is distributed worldwide by
CardioDynamics and GEMS-IT for their Solar® 7000,
8000, 8000M, and DASH 3000, 4000 patient monitors. We believe that other patient monitoring companies could benefit from the addition of similar modules to their estimated installed base of over 200,000 modular bedside monitors.



In July 2002, we signed a Co-Development and OEM Agreement with Philips
Medical Systems, a worldwide leader in clinical measurement and diagnostic solutions for the healthcare industry and a division of Royal Philips Electronics. The joint product development will combine CardioDynamics proprietary ICG technology
with Philips diagnostic 12-lead ECG. We released an ICG-only monitor on the Philips platform in the beginning of 2005. The Co-Development and OEM agreement will allow both companies to market the combined ICG/ECG product.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Medis entered into a technology licensing relationship with Analogic Corporation in March 2001. Under the
agreement, Medis licensed their ICG board and software design to Analogic as a key component to their own ICG monitor. This product, called the LifeGard Monitor, was released in 2004, and is also sold by Philips Medical Systems Monitoring Division
(Philips) as a stand-alone ICG monitor under the Philips brand. We will receive a licensing fee each time an Analogic or Philips ICG device is sold.



Medicare and Other Third-Party Reimbursement



In the outpatient market, most medical procedures are reimbursed by a variety of insurance sources, including Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers. The
Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which is the governmental body that approves medical services for financial reimbursement under Medicare, determines whether to reimburse for a given procedure and assigns an amount allowed. In
September 1998, the CMS mandated Medicare coverage of Electrical Bioimpedance services, such as the CardioDynamics BioZ, on a national basis. The established Medicare coverage for BioZ ICG Systems has improved our ability to penetrate the outpatient
market, as Medicare provides health insurance to approximately 50 million people in the United States.



In November 2000, CMS established a uniform national pricing level for the use of our equipment. In January 2002, the American Medical Association issued
a formal Level I HCPCS procedure code, (also referred to as a CPT Code) for BioZ ICG technology.



In 2002, CMS initiated a reconsideration of ICGs indications for use. In January 2004, CMS issued an updated national coverage determination. Of the
six indications previously indicated, five are substantially unchanged. One indication, suspected or known cardiovascular disease, has been revised to specifically allow CMS carrier coverage of resistant hypertension. Resistant
hypertension is defined by CMS to include patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (greater than or equal to 140 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and/or 90 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) on three or more anti-hypertensive medications. The other
current CMS indications are as follows:



| |  |  | Optimization of fluid management in patients with congestive heart failure.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Differentiation of cardiogenic from pulmonary causes of acute dyspnea.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Optimization of atrioventricular (A/V) interval for patients with A/V sequential cardiac pacemakers.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Monitoring of continuous inotropic therapy for patients with terminal congestive heart failure, when those patients have chosen to die with comfort at home, or for patients waiting
at home for a heart transplant.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Evaluation for rejection in patients with a heart transplant as a predetermined alternative to a myocardial biopsy.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Some private insurers cover the BioZ ICG test, including Aetna, Humana,
BlueCross BlueShield and others (in select states). We continue active discussions with CMS and private insurers to maintain and expand reimbursement indications for ICG.



Marketing



Our primary prospects in the outpatient market include cardiologists, internal medicine physicians and family practitioners caring for congestive heart
failure, hypertension, shortness of breath, and pacemaker patients. Patients in the United States who may benefit from our technology include the 50 million hypertension patients, five million congestive heart failure patients, over one million
pacemaker patients, 20 million emergency patients and many patients requiring fluid management. Our marketing strategy is designed to:



| |  |  | increase physician and hospital personnel knowledge of ICG technology;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



9



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | demonstrate the ability of the BioZ ICG Systems to assist physicians in the objective identification and appropriate pharmacological treatment of congestive heart failure,
hypertension, dyspnea and fluid management patients;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | show the ability of the BioZ ICG Systems to assist physicians in the optimization of pacemakers;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | demonstrate cost savings of providing ICG monitoring to patients through more efficient care and reimbursement through CMS-mandated Medicare and private insurers; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | educate physicians and hospital staff of the importance of hemodynamics in the treatment of patients who would normally not be monitored with a PAC due to practice setting, costs
and complications.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Our marketing promotion
strategy is based on key medical conference participation, direct mail programs, select medical journal advertising, internet-based product and clinical information, and live and direct mail clinical education literature.



Research and Development



Our research and development team, which consists of both scientific and
engineering professionals, has extensive experience in the areas of ICG, physiologic signal processing, hardware and software development and regulatory compliance. The team is responsible for on-going product engineering, new product development
and basic research into ICG technology and additional noninvasive monitoring applications.



Our team continues to investigate the physiologic mechanisms underlying our ICG signal as a means of developing new diagnostic parameters. In addition, we are continuously researching the application of digital signal
processing methodologies to improve the quality of signal acquisition and analysis algorithms. Some of this research has resulted in several U.S. patents issued and patents pending.



To supplement our internal development team, we retain Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc. (Rivertek) as an adjunct to our
development efforts, of which the Chief Technology Officer of the Company is a 100% beneficial owner. See Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in this Report on Form 10-K/A. Rivertek is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota and serves
as an engineering consulting firm for medical device manufacturers, including Guidant Corporation and Medtronic, Inc., as well as emerging medical technology companies.



Intellectual Property



Our success, to some extent, depends on our ability to maintain patent protection for our products and processes, to preserve our trade secrets and
proprietary technology and to operate without infringing upon the patents or proprietary rights of others. We have developed proprietary software for which we have not filed patents. We generally file patent applications in the United States and
foreign countries where patent protection for our technology is appropriate and available. We have filed nine U.S. utility patent applications and three design patent applications, six of which were issued in 2003. Of the three utility patents that
were issued, a key patent is U.S. Patent Number 6,561,986, Method and Apparatus for Hemodynamic Assessment Including Fiducial Point Detection, which contains 46 claims and is a strategic patent underlying the Companys novel
AERISTM(Adaptive Extraction & Recognition of Impedance Signals) processing. AERIS utilizes breakthrough
techniques in time-scale signal processing to filter and accurately determine key ICG and ECG waveform characteristics, known as fiducial points. ICG and ECG fiducial points form the core measurements from which BioZ parameters are
determined. AERIS processing provides enhanced stability, accuracy, and reproducibility in a broader range of patient monitoring conditions.



Another utility patent, U.S. 6,636,754, is the foundation of our electrode technology protection. Our three design patents that were issued in 2003 cover
various design aspects of the Companys BioZtect sensors. The intellectual property protection applies to sensors for use with both its BioZ ICG Monitor and BioZ ICG Module. The BioZtect sensors offer notable improvements in safety and signal
transmission and detection, which are critical for device performance. We also rely on nondisclosure and noncompetition agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect trade secrets and other proprietary technology.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Clinical Studies



We are committed to supporting well-designed clinical research studies utilizing ICG technology that demonstrate validity, reproducibility, clinical
utility and cost-effectiveness. Our clinical research team participates in monitoring and analysis of company-sponsored clinical trials, for which we employ clinical research associates, and the support of multiple investigator-initiated trials.
Each of these individuals has a strong clinical research background and is responsible for monitoring clinical studies and assisting in research and customer training.



Previous generation technology



Several hundred research papers on ICG technology have been published since 1993. In general, these studies reported
favorable results when comparing cardiac output measurements with those of other techniques, such as PAC.



The previous generation technology we acquired in 1993 worked reasonably well in a select group of patients. However, significant technological
limitations became evident when monitoring ventilated patients and those with increasing heart rates, high heart rates, abnormal heartbeats, high respiration rates and pacemakers. These limitations related to both hardware and software inadequacies.
As a result of intense research and development focus and concerted effort, combined with advances in computer processing power, CardioDynamics has addressed these limitations by improving the electronics and digital signal processing algorithms.



New technology



As studies are conducted with our new technology, their results are
summarized first as abstracts, and then as manuscripts that move through the peer review process towards publication. This process can take two years or more to complete. The results of several major studies addressing each of these areas have been
released with positive results.



In May 2002, the results of a
significant Mayo Clinic study were published in the peer-review journal, Hypertension. The results of the study demonstrated 70% superiority in effectively treating previously-uncontrolled hypertension patients when our BioZ® ICG was used as compared to traditional management by
high blood pressure specialist physicians.



In September 2004,
the results of the ED-IMPACT trial (Impedance Cardiography-Aided Assessment Changes Therapy in Emergent Dyspnea) were presented at the Heart Failure Society of America. The study demonstrated the impact of ICG data upon diagnosis and treatment in
patients short of breath in the emergency department. The results demonstrated a 39% change in therapeutic plan and 12% change in diagnosis, which were considered very significant findings.



In November of 2004, the results of the PREDICT (Prospective Evaluation and
Identification of Cardiac Decompensation in Patients with Heart Failure by Impedance Cardiography Test) were presented at the American Heart Association by principal investigator, Dr. Milton Packer, who led 21 top U.S. heart failure centers in the
study. The study was designed to show whether ICG variables could predict whether a heart failure patient would die or be hospitalized, and the results showed that of all the variables measured in the study, ICG was the most powerful predictor of
death or hospitalization. A patient with a high risk ICG test was over 8 times more likely to die or be hospitalized in the short-term (2 weeks) than a patient with a low risk ICG test.



In addition, multiple ICG studies have been published in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Chest, American
Journal of Cardiology and Congestive Heart Failure.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Current Trial



CONTROLConsideration Of Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring to Target Reduction Of Blood Pressure Levels.We are
sponsoring an 11-center trial in community-based treatment of hypertension to replicate the results of the significant Mayo Clinic Study in a non-hypertension-specialist environment. We are comparing the amount of time it takes to control blood
pressure as well as the number and cost of hypertensive medications required. This study is being conducted in two groups within each of four physicians patient populations, where each physician has access to the BioZ data in only half of the
study patients.



Manufacturing



Our products are manufactured in San Diego, California; Bellows Falls,
Vermont; and Illmenau, Germany. The CardioDynamics headquarters in San Diego includes the manufacturing and service facility for the CardioDynamics BioZ ICG systems. The Vermed subsidiary in Bellows Falls is a wholly owned subsidiary that
manufactures and packages disposable electrodes and related supplies utilized in ECG, ICG and other diagnostic procedures. The Medis subsidiary in Illmenau is a majority owned subsidiary that manufactures ICG and venous blood flow products,
including the Rheoscreen product line, Cardioscreen and Niccomo ICG monitors.



Each location has established procedures and controls intended to ensure that both products and purchased parts are designed and manufactured to meet customers requirements. We purchase the components and raw
materials used in manufacturing our products from various suppliers. Our suppliers are evaluated, qualified and monitored to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability. We have systems and procedures in place to
ensure timely and effective corrective and preventive actions are taken if we, or our customers, identify non-conformities.



Warranty and Repair



We warrant that our stand-alone BioZ System shall be free from defects for a period of 60 months from the date of shipment on each new system sold in the
United States and for 12 months on systems sold internationally and on refurbished or demonstration systems. The warranty includes all options and accessories purchased with the system, except for the external patient cables, the external printer,
and inflatable blood pressure cuffs that are covered for a period of 90 days. When warranty repairs are necessary, we generally perform them at our San Diego facility. In some cases, our distributors perform repairs in authorized service centers. In
2004, we added an additional International service center in Dubai, United Arab Emirates to fulfill the needs of the growing Middle-eastern market for ICG.



We provide on-call technical support and, on occasion, offer field clinical support specialists. In addition to our standard warranty, we offer Z
Care® extended warranty agreements for maintenance
beyond the standard warranty period. We repair equipment that is out of warranty on a time and materials basis.



Competition



Direct competition



To date, we have experienced virtually no direct competition, however, we are aware of at least two domestic and one international manufacturer of ICG
monitors. None of these companies have direct sales or clinical teams, and thus far, have had very little visibility in the market. We believe that our BioZ products provide the most advanced ICG monitoring and commercially attractive designs, at
prices that are competitive.



Indirect competition



PAC



Also known as thermodilution, right heart catheterization or Swan-Ganz catheterization, the PAC procedure was introduced in
the early 1970s. Despite its limitations, costs and risks, PAC remains the most



12



---

##### Table of Contents

commonly used technology for monitoring hemodynamic status. Medical Data International estimates that PAC procedures are used nearly two million times per
year worldwide. Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Laboratories and Datex-Ohmeda produce the majority of right heart catheters used in the United States.



ICG technology eliminates PAC-caused complications and death, lowers costs, reduces procedure time, expands clinical applications and offers immediate
availability of vital, real-time and continuous hemodynamic data.



Echocardiography



Echocardiography (echo) is a
diagnostic tool utilizing ultrasound frequency waves to detect anatomical abnormalities of the heart and blood vessels. Echo technology was developed during the 1970s and has advanced through the years with the addition of sophisticated
electronics and digitalization for acquisition of better images. A continuous wave suprasternal Doppler echo measures cardiac output noninvasively by placing a Doppler transducer on the chest, aiming it toward the ascending aorta and measuring
aortic blood flow velocity. Specifically, echo measures the aortic diameter and the movement of red blood cells to determine the velocity and direction of blood flow to calculate stroke volume and thus calculate cardiac output. While it is possible,
echo is not routinely used to measure cardiac output because of its technological limitations, cost, time, and lack of reimbursement for this purpose.



Trans-esophageal echo



Trans-esophageal echo has been developed in recent years to obtain closer images of the heart. It is useful in patients for whom examination from the
usual external position is technically impossible or for hospitalized patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Trans-esophageal echo is performed with the ultrasound transducer placed in the esophagus through the mouth. Although this procedure enables
more direct, accurate images of the heart, disadvantages include its invasive nature, increased patient discomfort and the requirement for patient sedation to promote procedure tolerance. In addition, patient airway complications may result,
therefore emergency equipment, such as oxygen, intubation equipment and ECG monitoring must be immediately available. The procedure is customarily performed with several attendants, including an echo technician, a nurse and a physician.



Direct and Indirect Fick



Direct Fick was the original method conceived in the late 1800s to
measure cardiac output. It is based on calculating the oxygen difference between the arterial and venous blood, along with oxygen inhalation and expiration. The Direct Fick method is seldom used because it is time consuming, costly and complicated.
A variation of the Direct Fick method is called CO2Re-breathing, or Indirect Fick. It was introduced in the
1980s to the hospital surgical market. Because CO2Re-breathing method is limited to patients who are
mechanically ventilated, the number of patients who are candidates for the procedure is severely limited.



Government Regulation



Our products are classified as medical devices subject to regulation in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). New products generally required FDA clearance under a procedure known as 510(k) pre-market notification. A
510(k) pre-market notification clearance indicates FDA agreement with an applicants determination that the product is substantially equivalent to another marketed medical device. Our products generally are Class II products with the FDA.
Delays in receipt of, or failure to obtain or maintain, regulatory clearances and approvals, or any failure to comply with regulatory requirements, could delay or prevent our ability to market our product line.



The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, its subsequent amendments and
modernization acts, and similar foreign regulations, require that medical devices be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing



13



---

##### Table of Contents

practices and quality system requirements. Our manufacturing processes and facilities are subject to periodic on-site inspections and continuing review by
applicable regulatory bodies to ensure compliance with Quality System regulations. We believe that our products currently meet applicable standards for the countries in which they are marketed.



We are required to report to the FDA and international agencies information
that a device has or may contribute to a death or a serious injury. We also may be subject to product recalls. No such report or recall has had a material effect on our financial condition, but there can be no assurance regulatory issues may not
have a material adverse effect in the future.



We are subject
to various environmental laws and regulations. Like other medical device companies, our operations involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing processes. While it is difficult to quantify the
potential impact of compliance with environmental protection laws, we believe that we are in material compliance with current environmental standards and that continued compliance will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations or liquidity.



Failure to comply with applicable
governmental regulations can result in various penalties, including fines, recalls or seizure of product, total or partial suspension of production, refusal or delay in product approvals or clearances, increased quality control costs or criminal
prosecution. Any change in existing federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, or in the interpretation or enforcement thereof, of the promulgation of any additional laws or regulations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.



In order to
sell our products within the European community, we must comply with the European Commissions medical device directive. In late 1998, we received authorization from TUV Rhineland of North America to place the CE mark on our BioZ ICG Monitor.
The CE mark is recognized worldwide as an essential European regulatory approval and enabled us to expand our sales and distribution of the BioZ ICG Monitor throughout Europe. Future regulatory changes could limit our ability to use the CE mark, and
any new products we develop may not qualify for the CE mark. If we fail to obtain authorization to use the CE mark or lose this authorization, we will not be able to sell our products in the European community. In October 2004, we had our annual
compliance review and we passed without any significant issues.



In May 2000, we received approval from the State Drug Administration of the Peoples Republic of China, and in November 2000, we received a Canadian Medical Device License. In February 2002, our distribution partners received MHLW and
KFDA approvals, enabling our products to be sold in Japan and Korea.



Employees



As of November 30, 2004, we had 262
employees, none of which are covered by a collective bargaining union agreement. We consider our employee relations with our employees to be good.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS



In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, you should consider the following risk factors which
could affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks facing us and additional risks and uncertainties may also harm our business.



We depend upon on our BioZ product line, which is in its early stages
of market acceptance.



Our future is dependent upon
the success of the BioZ product line and similar products that are based on the same core technology. The market for these products is in a relatively early stage of development and may never fully develop as we expect. The long-term commercial
success of the BioZ product line requires widespread acceptance of our products as safe, efficient and cost-effective. Widespread acceptance would represent a significant change in medical practice patterns. In the past, some medical professionals
have hesitated to use ICG products because of limitations experienced with older, analog-based monitors. Invasive procedures, such as PAC, are generally accepted in the medical community and have a long history of use.



We have sponsored and will continue to sponsor or support clinical trials. We
cannot be certain that clinical trials will be completed, that they will have a positive outcome or that a positive outcome in these trials will be sufficient to promote widespread acceptance of our products within the medical community.



Our success depends in part upon the availability of adequate
third-party reimbursement.



Our success will depend in
part on the availability of adequate reimbursement for our customers from third-party healthcare payors, such as Medicare, private health insurers and managed care organizations. Third-party payors increasingly are challenging the pricing of medical
products and services. Third-party payors may not cover all or a portion of the cost of our products and related services, or they may place significant restrictions on the circumstances in which coverage will be available. In addition,
reimbursement may not be at, or remain at, price levels adequate to allow medical professionals to realize an appropriate return on the purchase of our products.



Effective September 1, 2005, we will be required to account for stock options under our employee stock plans as a
compensation expense, our net income and earnings per share will be significantly reduced.



For employee option grants, we calculate compensation expense and disclose the impact on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share in a footnote
to our financial statements. Recent accounting pronouncements will require us to record compensation expense for employee stock option grants in our statement of operations. Note 1, Stock-Based Compensation, to our financial statements,
reflects the impact that adoption of FAS 123 would have had on our net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share had we adopted this provision during the past three years. We have not yet determined the impact of FAS 123R but would expect the
results to be similar to those disclosed in Note 1 to our financial statements.



Technological change is difficult to predict and to manage.



Our product line has required, and any future products will require, substantial development efforts and compliance with governmental clearance or
approval requirements. We may encounter unforeseen technological or scientific problems that force abandonment or substantial change in the development of a specific product or process.



We must maintain and develop strategic relationships with third parties to increase market penetration of our product
lines.



We distribute our products to targeted
international markets through our strategic alliance with GEMS-IT and a network of regional distributors and to the US market through our direct sales force and several regional



15



---

##### Table of Contents

and national distributors. We intend to enter into similar agreements with other companies and to establish technology partnerships with other medical
product, distribution and technology companies. Widespread acceptance of our BioZ products is largely dependent on our establishing and maintaining these strategic relationships with third parties and on the successful distribution efforts of third
parties.



Many aspects of our relationships with third parties,
and the success with which third parties promote distribution of our products, are beyond our control. We may be unsuccessful in maintaining our existing strategic relationships and in identifying and entering into future development and
distribution agreements with third parties.



We depend on
management and other key personnel.



We are dependent
on a limited number of key management and technical personnel. The loss of one or more of our key employees may hurt our business if we are unable to identify other individuals to provide us with similar services. We do not maintain key
person insurance on any of our employees. In addition, our success depends upon our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified sales, management, finance, manufacturing, research and development personnel. We face intense
competition in our recruiting activities and may not be able to attract or retain qualified personnel.



We are subject to stock exchange and government regulation.



Recent Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and stock exchange regulations have increased financial reporting and disclosure
requirements, corporate governance and internal control requirements, including future compliance of our acquired businesses that have significantly increased the administrative costs of documenting and auditing internal processes, gathering data,
and reporting information. In addition, the reporting timeframes have been, and will continue to be, compressed. The need to commit substantial resources and management attention in these areas could impact our ability to deploy those same resources
to other areas of our business. If we are unable to comply with the requirements, it could significantly impact our market valuation.



We depend on third parties for development and manufacturing services.



Our strategy for development and commercialization of some of our products depends upon entering into various arrangements
with third parties and upon the subsequent success of these parties in performing their obligations. We may not be able to negotiate acceptable arrangements in the future, and our existing arrangements may not be successful. We rely on contracted
engineering services, particularly from Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc. Also, we currently assemble our products from components manufactured by a limited number of manufacturers. Therefore, we are dependent on component and subassembly
manufacturers. If we experience a termination, modification or disruption of any of our development or manufacturing arrangements, we may be unable to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis, which may lead to customer dissatisfaction
and damage to our reputation.



We may not have adequate
intellectual property protection.



Our patents and
proprietary technology may not be sufficient to protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, in the future, our products may be found to infringe the rights of others. From time to time, we have received communications from third parties
asserting that features of some of our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Any claims resulting in intellectual property litigation, whether defensive or offensive would have no certain outcome and would be costly and
time-consuming. In addition, if our products were found to infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we may be required to pay damages to such parties and/or to obtain licenses from such parties, either of which could be costly and could
harm our business.



The validity and breadth of claims in
medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual questions. There can be no assurance that pending patent applications will result in issued patents, that future



16



---

##### Table of Contents

patent applications will be issued, that patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors or that such patents will
be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect our technology or to provide us with a competitive advantage. Our patents may be found to be invalid and other companies may claim rights in or ownership of the patents and other proprietary
rights held or licensed by us. Also, our existing patents may not cover products that we develop in the future. Moreover, when our patents expire, the inventions will enter the public domain.



Since patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy
until patents are issued, our patent applications may infringe patents that may be issued to others. If our products were found to infringe patents held by competitors, we may have to modify our products to avoid infringement, and it is possible
that our modified products would not be commercially successful.



We also rely on nondisclosure and noncompetition agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect trade secrets and other proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that
we will have adequate remedies for any breach, that others will not independently develop equivalent proprietary information or that third parties will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and proprietary knowledge.



We face competition from other companies and technologies.



We compete with other companies that are developing
and marketing noninvasive hemodynamic monitors. In early 2004, Analogic released the LifeGard ICG Monitor which is also available to be sold by Philips. We are also subject to competition from companies that support invasive technologies. Many of
these companies have more established and larger marketing and sales organizations, significantly greater financial and technical resources and a larger installed base of customers than we do.



The introduction by others of products embodying new technologies and the
emergence of new industry standards may render our products obsolete and unmarketable. In addition, other technologies or products may be developed that have an entirely different approach or means of accomplishing the intended purposes of our
products. Accordingly, the life cycles of our products are difficult to estimate. To compete successfully, we must develop and introduce new products that keep pace with technological advancements, respond to evolving consumer requirements and
achieve market acceptance. We may be unable to develop new products that address our competition.



Our business plan contemplates an income stream from sales of disposable sensors that are compatible with an installed base of our monitors. We may be
subject to price competition from other sensor manufacturers whose products are also compatible with our monitors. To mitigate this we developed proprietary sensor technology that provides enhanced features to our customers and promotes the
exclusive use of our proprietary sensors with our equipment.



In addition, our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships with large medical equipment companies to gain access to greater research and development or marketing resources. Competition may result in price
reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share.



We have a history of losses and may experience continued losses.



With the exception of the last three fiscal years, we have experienced losses every year because we have expended more money in the course of researching, developing and enhancing our technology and products and
establishing our sales, marketing and administrative organizations than we have generated in revenues. We expect that our operating expenses will continue to increase in the foreseeable future as we increase our sales and marketing activities,
expand our operations and continue to develop our technology. It is possible that we will not be able to achieve the revenue levels required to sustain profitability.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

We may need additional capital, which may be unavailable.



The commercialization of our current product line, acquisition of
complimentary technologies and the development and commercialization of any additional products may require greater expenditures than expected in our current business plan. Our capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including:



| |  |  | our rate of sales growthfast growth may actually increase our need for additional capital to hire additional staff, purchase additional inventory, and finance the increase in
accounts receivable;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our progress in marketing-related clinical evaluations and product development programs, all of which will require additional capital;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our receipt of, and the time required to obtain, regulatory clearances and approvalsthe longer regulatory approval takes, the more working capital we will need to support our
regulatory and development efforts in advance of sales;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the level of resources that we devote to the development, manufacture and marketing of our productsany decision we make to improve, expand, acquire complimentary technologies
or simply change our process, products or technology will require increased funds;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | facilities requirementsas we grow we need additional manufacturing, warehousing and administration facilities and the costs of the facilities will be borne before
substantially increased revenue from growth would occur;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | market acceptance and demand for our productsalthough growth may increase our capital needs, the lack of growth and continued losses would also increase our need for capital;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | customer financing strategiesour attempt to accelerate the purchasing processes by offering internal leasing programs as an alternative to outright purchasing and by providing
purchasers with extended payment terms and financing options will consume additional capital; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | large electrode contractswe intend to bid on several large electrode manufacturing contracts, any one of which, if awarded would require substantial capital investment in
equipment at our Vermed division.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



We may be
unable to predict accurately the timing and amount of our capital requirements. We may be required to raise additional funds through public or private financing, bank loans, collaborative relationships or other arrangements earlier than expected. It
is possible that banks, venture capitalists and other investors may perceive our capital structure, our history of losses or the need to achieve widespread acceptance of our technology as too great a risk to bear. As a result, additional funding may
not be available at attractive terms, or at all. If we cannot obtain additional capital when needed, we may be forced to agree to unattractive financing terms, to change our method of operation or to curtail our operations.



We may not be able to manage growth successfully.



If successful, we will experience a period of growth that could place a
significant strain upon our managerial, financial and operational resources. Our infrastructure, procedures, controls and information systems may not be adequate to support our operations and to achieve the rapid execution necessary to successfully
market our products. Our future operating results will also depend on our ability to continually upgrade our information systems, expand our direct sales force and our internal sales, marketing and support staff. If we are unable to manage future
expansion effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition will suffer, our senior management will be less effective, and our revenues and product development efforts may decrease.



We may not receive approvals by foreign regulators that are necessary
for international sales.



Sales of medical devices
outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary from country to country. If we or our international distributors fail to obtain or maintain required pre-market



18



---

##### Table of Contents

approvals or fail to comply with foreign regulations, foreign regulatory authorities may require us to file revised governmental notifications, cease
commercial sales of our products in the applicable countries or otherwise cure the problem. Such enforcement action by regulatory authorities may be costly. In order to sell our products within the European community, we must comply with the
European communitys medical device directive. The CE marking on our products attests to this compliance. Future regulatory changes may limit our ability to use the CE mark, and any new products we develop may not qualify for the CE mark. If we
lose this authorization or fail to obtain authorization on future products, we will not be able to sell our products in the European community.



Our quarterly operating results frequently vary due to factors outside our control.



We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in
quarterly operating results due to a number of factors. We cannot control many of these factors, which include the following:



| |  |  | the timing and number of new product introductions;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | seasonality and the number of selling days in a given quarter;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the mix of sales of higher and lower margin products in a quarter;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the market acceptance of our products;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | development and promotional expenses relating to the introduction of new products or enhancements of existing products;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | product returns or bad debt write-offs;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in pricing policies by our competitors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of regulatory compliance audits;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing of orders from major customers and distributors; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | delays in shipment of products, either to us or to our customers.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



For these reasons, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our financial results as indications of future results.



We may not continue to receive necessary FDA or other regulatory
clearances or approvals.



Our products and activities
are subject to extensive, ongoing regulation by the Food and Drug Administration and other governmental authorities. Delays in receipt of, or failure to obtain or maintain, regulatory clearances and approvals, or any failure to comply with
regulatory requirements, could delay or prevent our ability to market or distribute our product line.



We are subject to product liability claims and product recalls that may not be covered by insurance.



The nature of our business exposes us to risks of product liability claims
and product recalls. Medical devices as complex as ours frequently experience errors or failures, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. For example, we voluntarily retrieved 43 units of our new BioZ ICG Monitors
from purchasers in December 2001 due to performance issues identified in conjunction with early users of this product. All units were replaced and retrofitted to address the performance issues. Our products are sometimes used in procedures where
there is a high risk of serious injury or death. These risks will exist even with respect to those products that have received, or may in the future receive, regulatory clearance for commercial sale.



We did not carry product liability insurance during some periods before May
15, 1995. We currently maintain product liability insurance, however our product liability insurance may not be adequate. In the future, insurance coverage may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, product
liability claims or product recalls could damage our reputation even if we have adequate insurance coverage.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Our common stock is subject to price volatility.



The market price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to
be highly volatile. Our stock price could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors beyond our control, including:



| |  |  | actual or anticipated quarterly variations in operating results;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | announcements of technological innovations, new products or pricing by our competitors;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in, or failure to meet, financial estimates of securities analysts;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the rate of adoption by physicians of ICG technology in targeted markets;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the timing and extent of technological advancements, patent and regulatory approvals;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | anything other than unqualified reports by our outside auditors;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | results of clinical studies;
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | the sales of our common stock by affiliates or other shareholders with large holdings; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | general economic and market conditions.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



Our future operating results may fall below the expectations of securities industry analysts or investors. Any such shortfall could result in a
significant decline in the market price of our common stock. In addition, the stock market has at times experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of the stock of many medical device companies that
often have been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations may directly influence the market price of our common stock.



Our international sales expose us to unique risks.



In fiscal 2004, international sales accounted for approximately 8% of our
net sales. We believe that international sales could represent a meaningful portion of our revenue in the future. We rely on regional distributors and GEMS-IT to assist us with our international sales efforts. In June of 2004, we purchased 80% of
the outstanding common stock of Medis, which is located in Ilmenau, Germany. As such, we are exposed to risks from international sales, which include unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers and restrictions and
reduced protection for intellectual property rights. Moreover, fluctuations in the rates of exchange may increase the price in local currencies of our products in foreign markets and make our products relatively more expensive than competitive
products.



We may not be able to execute our acquisition
strategy or successfully integrate future acquisitions.



We expect to continue to pursue opportunities to acquire or make investments in other technologies, products and businesses that could enhance our technical capabilities, complement our current products or expand the breadth of our markets
or customer base. We have limited experience in acquiring other businesses and technologies.



Potential and completed acquisitions and strategic investments involve numerous risks, including:



| |  |  | problems assimilating the purchased technologies, products or business operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | unanticipated cost associated with the acquisition, including accounting charges and transaction expenses;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | problems implementing and maintaining adequate standards, procedures, controls and policies;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | diversion of managements attention from our core business;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



20



---

##### Table of Contents

If we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions and strategic investments, our management team
may be distracted from our day-to-day operations, our business may be disrupted, and our operating results may suffer. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by incurring debt or issuing equity, our existing shareholders would be diluted or we
would have to generate additional profits to cover the interest expense.



Utilization of our deferred tax assets may be limited and is dependant on future taxable income.



We have federal operating loss carryforwards of approximately $23,300,000 for federal income tax purposes. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 contains provisions
under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code that limit the federal net operating loss carryforwards that may be used in any given year in the event of specified occurrences, including significant ownership changes. If these specified events occur
we may lose some or all of the tax benefits of these carryforwards.



We determined, based on our assessment of both positive and negative evidence and objective and subjective evidence, which takes into consideration our forecasted taxable income, that it is more likely than not that we will benefit from the
use of the deferred tax assets, and therefore we reduced our valuation allowance on the existing deferred tax assets related to these NOLs to zero in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Upon reducing the valuation allowance and recognizing the
deferred tax assets, we recognized the tax benefit of deferred tax assets. The favorable impact of the tax benefit distorts the trends in our operating results and impacts the comparability of our current period results of operations with other
periods. If in the future we determine, based on our assessment of both positive and negative evidence and objective and subjective evidence, which takes into consideration our forecasted taxable income, that it is more likely than not that we will
not realize all or a portion of the deferred tax assets, we will record a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets which would result in recognition of income tax expense.



Terrorist attacks in the United States and the threat of war have affected travel, the stock market, the postal
service and the general economy.



In the wake of the
terrorist attacks that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, stock prices broadly declined from the prices that existed prior to the attacks. In addition to affecting the stock markets, the terrorist attacks may affect the United
States and international economies because of the uncertainties that exist as to how the United States will respond in the future and as to whether additional attacks will be carried out against the United States. These uncertainties brought about
challenges in travel, mail delivery and contributed to a slowdown in economic activity in the United States and beyond. Limitations on travel by our sales and clinical staff could negatively affect our ability to achieve our revenue goals.
Additionally, travel closures or delays could negatively impact deliveries of raw materials from our vendors required to manufacture our products including the disposable sensors and deliver them in a timely way to our customers. Delays in the
delivery of mail could inhibit our ability to invoice and collect amounts owed to us.



Recent corporate scandals involving alleged accounting irregularities have resulted in unavailability of or significantly higher premiums for director and officer liability insurance.



As a result of well-publicized corporate business failures involving
improper acts by executives and accounting irregularities, director and officer liability insurance has become more difficult to obtain. If we are unable to obtain sufficient director and officer liability insurance at rates that are reasonable or
at all or if the possibility of director and officer liability is expanded by regulatory or judicial developments, we may not be able to retain our current officers and directors or attract qualified directors and officers in the future.



We do not know the effects of healthcare reform proposals.



The healthcare industry is undergoing fundamental
changes resulting from political, economic and regulatory influences. In the United States, comprehensive programs have been suggested that would increase access to healthcare for the uninsured, control the escalation of healthcare expenditures
within the economy and use healthcare reimbursement policies to balance the federal budget.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

We expect that the U.S. Congress and state legislatures will continue to review and assess various
healthcare reform proposals, and public debate of these issues will likely continue. We cannot predict which, if any, of such reform proposals will be adopted and when they might be effective. Other countries also are considering healthcare reform.
Significant changes in healthcare systems could have a substantial impact on the manner in which we conduct our business and could require us to revise our strategies.



A low stock price could result in our being de-listed from the Nasdaq Market and subject us to regulations that could
reduce our ability to raise funds.



If our stock price
were to drop below $1.00 per share and remain below $1.00 per share for an extended period of time, or if we fail to maintain other NASDAQ criteria, Nasdaq may de-list our common stock from the Nasdaq National Market. In such an event, our shares
could only be traded on over-the-counter bulletin board system. This method of trading could significantly impair our ability to raise new capital.



In the event that our common stock was de-listed from the Nasdaq National Market due to low stock price, we may become subject to special rules, called
penny stock rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our common stock. The rules require, among other things, the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a disclosure schedule required by the SEC relating to
the market for penny stocks. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable both to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities, and monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent
price information.



In the event that our common stock becomes
characterized as a penny stock, our market liquidity could be severely affected. The regulations relating to penny stocks could limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and thus the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell
their common stock in the secondary market.



We do not
intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.



We
do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Payment of such cash dividends would, in any event, be prohibited or limited under the terms of our bank line of credit.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES
|------- | ----------



We are headquartered in San Diego, California and operate manufacturing locations in San Diego, California; Bellow Falls, Vermont; and Ilmenau, Germany.
In 2004, we amended the operating lease in San Diego, California to provide for additional expansion space of approximately 15,000 square-feet.



|                      |  |                                                                                               |  |                            |  |                       |  |                
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ---------------
|Location              |  | Use                                                                                           |  | Owned/Leased               |  | Lease TerminationDate |  | Size (Sq. Feet)
|San Diego, California |  | Corporate HeadquartersSales & MarketingResearch & Development Manufacturing & Distribution    |  | Leased                     |  | December 2007         |  | 32,779         
|                      |  |                                                                                               |  |                           
|Bellow Falls, Vermont |  | General & AdministrativeSales & MarketingResearch & Development Manufacturing & Distribution  |  | Owned                      |  | N/A                   |  | 45,972         
|                      |  |                                                                                               |  |                           
|Ilmenau, Germany      |  | General & Administrative Sales &
Marketing Research & DevelopmentManufacturing & Distribution |  | Owned(80% ownedsubsidiary) |  | N/A                   |  | 7,173          



|ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|------- | -----------------



We are from time to time subject to legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business, none of which is required to be
disclosed under this Item 3. Management believes that resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.



|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------



No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT



The following table sets forth information with respect to our executive officers:



|                          |  |     |  |                                           
|------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                      |  | Age |  | Position(s)                               
|Michael K. Perry          |  | 44  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director      
|Rhonda F. Rhyne           |  | 44  |  | President                                 
|Steve P. Loomis           |  | 44  |  | Chief Financial Officer                   
|Russell H. Bergen         |  | 57  |  | Vice President of Operations              
|Dennis G. Hepp            |  | 55  |  | Chief Technology Officer                  
|Patrick W. Bradley, Ph.D. |  | 51  |  | Vice President of Business Development    
|Richard E. Trayler        |  | 54  |  | Vice President of International Operations



Michael K.
Perry, age 44, has been our chief executive officer and a director since April 1998. From 1994 to 1997, Mr. Perry was vice president of operations at Pyxis Corporation, a leading provider of healthcare automation, information management services
and pharmacy management services to hospitals and outpatient facilities. Pyxis was acquired by Cardinal Health, Inc. in 1996. Prior to joining Pyxis, Mr. Perry served in various management positions with the medical products group of Hewlett Packard
Company. Additionally, he was director of quality for a division of Hewlett-Packards deskjet printer group. Mr. Perry holds a bachelors degree in mechanical engineering from General Motors Institute and a masters degree in business
administration from Harvard University. Mr. Perry serves on the advisory board of the University of California San Diego Cardiovascular Center.



Rhonda F. Rhyne, age 44, has been our president since June 1997, previously serving as chief operating officer from 1996 to 1997 and as vice
president of operations from 1995 to 1996. From 1992 until 1995, Ms. Rhyne was president, chief executive officer and vice president of sales and marketing for Culture Technology, Inc. Ms. Rhyne has also held sales positions at GE Medical Systems
and Quinton Instrument Company, both medical device subsidiaries of publicly held companies. Ms. Rhyne holds a bachelors degree in pharmacy from Washington State University and a masters degree in business administration, executive
program, from University of California Los Angeles, Anderson School of Business.



Steve P. Loomis, age 44, joined the Company in September 1996 as vice president of finance and has held the positions of chief financial officer and corporate secretary since April 1997. From 1993 until 1996,
he served as director of financial reporting at Kinkos Inc. From 1988 to 1993, Mr. Loomis was chief financial officer for Terminal Data Corporation, a publicly traded company. He earned his bachelors degree in business administration
from California State University at Northridge. Mr. Loomis is a certified public accountant.



Russell H. Bergen, age 57, has served as our vice president of operations since joining us in September 1998. From 1971 to 1998, Mr. Bergen held management positions in the instrument group, peripheral
products group and inkjet business unit of Hewlett Packard Company. Previously, Mr. Bergen was employed at Honeywell, Inc. as a procurement engineer. Mr. Bergen earned bachelor degrees in aerospace engineering and manpower management from the
University of Colorado at Boulder.



Dennis G. Hepp, age
55, has been our chief technology officer since June 1997 and has served as a consultant to us since July 1995. From 1974 to 1986, Mr. Hepp held engineering and management positions at Medtronic, Inc. In 1989, Mr. Hepp founded, and remains a key
employee and managing director of Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc., an engineering consulting firm to medical device manufacturers. Mr. Hepp has a bachelors degree in electrical engineering from the University of Detroit.



Patrick W. Bradley, Ph.D., age 51, joined CardioDynamics in September
2000 as vice president of business development. Dr. Bradley served as director of new technologies for Cardiac Science, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and from 1993 to 1999; Dr. Bradley was associate vice president for OEM Technologies at VitalCom, Inc.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Prior to that, he was director of product management at Quinton Instrument Company. Dr. Bradley has served on the Scientific Peer Review Committee for the
American Heart Association and on the Sports Science Research Group for the United States Olympic Committee. He has a bachelors degree in biology from Texas A&M University and a masters degree and Ph.D. in physiology from University
of Houston.



Richard E. Trayler, age 54, is our
vice president of international operations and served as our chief operating officer from July 1997 to January 2003. From 1982 to 1997, Mr. Trayler held sales management positions at Quinton Instrument Company. He has also held positions at the
Heart Institute for CARE, the University of Washington and the Boeing Company. Mr. Trayler earned a bachelors degree from Texas A&M University and a masters degree from the University of Washington.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II



|ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol CDIC. The following table provides the high
and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market.



|                              |  |      |      |     |   |     
|----------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | --- | - | ----
|                              |  | High |      | Low
|Year Ended November 30, 2004: |  |      |      |     |   |     
|Fourth Quarter                |  | $    | 5.67 |     | $ | 3.62
|Third Quarter                 |  |      | 6.80 |     |   | 3.72
|Second Quarter                |  |      | 6.85 |     |   | 5.81
|First Quarter                 |  |      | 6.98 |     |   | 5.19
|                              |  |     
|Year Ended November 30, 2003: |  |      |      |     |   |     
|Fourth Quarter                |  | $    | 6.74 |     | $ | 4.20
|Third Quarter                 |  |      | 4.85 |     |   | 3.01
|Second Quarter                |  |      | 3.56 |     |   | 2.60
|First Quarter                 |  |      | 4.30 |     |   | 2.90



On January 14, 2005
there were approximately 500 holders of record of our common stock. We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on shares of our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to
retain any future earnings for use in the operation of our business.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM  6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



The following table summarizes certain selected financial data and has been derived from our audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our audited financial statements and related Notes.



|                                                                 |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ |  | ---- | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                 |  | Years Ended November 30,              |       
|                                                                 |  | 2004(1)                               |        | 2003 |   | 2002   |  | 2001 |        |  | 2000 |       
|                                                                 |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |       
|Statements of Operations Data:                                   |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Net sales                                                        |  | $                                     | 40,988 |      | $ | 30,332 |  | $    | 23,523 |  | $    | 19,598 |   |  | $ | 13,102 |  
|Income (loss) from operations                                    |  |                                       | 2,924  |      |   | 2,328  |  |      | 10     |  |      | (1,162 | ) |  |   | (8,501 | )
|Net income (loss)                                                |  |                                       | 10,123 |      |   | 2,452  |  |      | 310    |  |      | (659   | ) |  |   | (8,267 | )
|Net income (loss) per common share:                              |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                                            |  | $                                     | .21    |      | $ | .05    |  | $    | .01    |  | $    | (.01   | ) |  | $ | (.19   | )
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                                          |  | $                                     | .21    |      | $ | .05    |  | $    | .01    |  | $    | (.01   | ) |  | $ | (.19   | )
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Weighted-average number of shares used in per share calculation: |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                                            |  |                                       | 47,668 |      |   | 46,248 |  |      | 46,087 |  |      | 45,583 |   |  |   | 43,145 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                                          |  |                                       | 49,164 |      |   | 47,607 |  |      | 47,458 |  |      | 45,583 |   |  |   | 43,145 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):                           |  |                                       |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |  |      |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Working capital                                                  |  | $                                     | 19,493 |      | $ | 21,204 |  | $    | 18,164 |  | $    | 15,957 |   |  | $ | 15,855 |  
|Cash, cash equivalents and Investments                           |  |                                       | 6,801  |      |   | 9,345  |  |      | 6,879  |  |      | 6,394  |   |  |   | 11,595 |  
|Net intangible assets                                            |  |                                       | 4,550  |      |   |       |  |      |       |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Goodwill                                                         |  |                                       | 11,186 |      |   |       |  |      |       |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Total assets                                                     |  |                                       | 58,030 |      |   | 26,648 |  |      | 23,566 |  |      | 21,461 |   |  |   | 21,561 |  
|Total long-term liabilities                                      |  |                                       | 5,338  |      |   | 719    |  |      | 560    |  |      | 327    |   |  |   | 87     |  
|Minority interest                                                |  |                                       | 194    |      |   |       |  |      |       |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Total shareholders equity                                       |  |                                       | 44,734 |      |   | 23,020 |  |      | 19,724 |  |      | 18,423 |   |  |   | 18,566 |  

---

|(1) | 2004 includes the results of operations of Vermed and Medis businesses acquired March 22, 2004 and June 2, 2004, respectively, which affect the comparability of the Selected
Financial Data. See note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes an income tax benefit of $7.4 million resulting from elimination of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets (see Note 14 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



27



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The following managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related Notes, as well as the other financial information included in this Form 10-K/A. Some of our discussion is forward-looking and involves risks and uncertainties. For information
regarding risk factors that could have a material adverse effect on our business, refer to Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K/A, BusinessRisk Factors.



Results of Operations



CardioDynamics is the innovator and market leader of an important medical technology called Impedance Cardiography (ICG). We develop, manufacture, and
market noninvasive diagnostic and monitoring technologies and electrocardiograph (ECG) electrode sensors. Unlike other traditional cardiac function monitoring technologies, our monitors are noninvasive (without cutting into the body). Our BioZ ICG
Systems obtain data in a safe, efficient and cost-effective manner not previously available in the physicians office and many hospital settings.



Just as electrocardiography noninvasively measures the hearts electrical characteristics, ICG makes it possible to noninvasively measure the
hearts mechanical characteristics by monitoring the hearts ability to deliver blood to the body. Our ICG products measure 12 hemodynamic (blood flow) parameters, the most significant of which is cardiac output, or the amount of blood
pumped by the heart each minute.



Our lead products, the BioZ
ICG Monitor and the BioZ ICG Module for GE Healthcare patient monitoring systems, have been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and carry the CE Mark, which is a required certification of environmental and safety compliance by the
European Community for sale of electronic equipment.



The aging
of the worldwide population along with continued cost containment pressures on healthcare systems and the desire of clinicians and administrators to use less invasive (or noninvasive) procedures are important trends that are helping drive adoption
of our BioZ ICG Systems. These trends are likely to continue into the foreseeable future and should provide continued growth prospects for our Company.



There is often a slow adoption of new technologies in the healthcare industry, even technologies that ultimately become widely accepted. Making physicians
aware of the availability and benefits of a new technology, changing physician habits, the time required to secure adequate reimbursement levels, and the malpractice and legal issues that overlay the healthcare industry are all factors that tend to
slow the rate of adoption for new medical technologies. We have invested a significant amount of our resources in clinical trials, which, if results prove successful, should contribute to further physician acceptance and market adoption of our
technology. As with any clinical trial, there is not absolute assurance of the desired positive outcome.



We continue to invest in our partnerships to increase the presence and adoption of ICG technology. Our principal strategic partners include GE Healthcare
and Philips Medical Systems (Philips), both of which are among the premier medical technology companies in the world and have a substantial installed base of medical devices. We are currently selling the BioZ ICG Module through GE
Healthcare and are co-developing the BioZ Dx with Philips, the next generation ICG monitor. These strategic relationships further validate the importance of our technology to the clinical community and provide additional distribution channels for
our systems. We intend to seek additional strategic partnerships over time to further the validation, distribution, and adoption of our technology.



We believe that the greatest risks in executing our business plan in the near term include: an adverse change in U.S. reimbursement policies for our
technology, negative clinical trial results, competition from emerging ICG companies or other new technologies that could yield similar or superior clinical outcomes at reduced cost, or the



28



---

##### Table of Contents

inability to hire, train, and retain the necessary sales and clinical personnel to meet our growth objectives. Our management team devotes a considerable
amount of time to assuring that we are mitigating these and other risks, described in the risk factor section in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K/A, to the greatest extent possible.



Following is a list of some of the key milestones we achieved in 2004:



| |  |  | 26th consecutive quarter of year-over-year revenue growth;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 11th consecutive quarter of profitability;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Tenth consecutive quarter of positive operating cash flow;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Acquisitions of Vermed and Medis;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | Revenue growth of 35%, compared to last year;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Improved profitability by 26% with $2,924,000 income from operations;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Operating cash flow up 96% at $4,366,000;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | Paid down $1,767,000 of bank term loan;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | ICG sensor revenue growth of 26%, to $6,520,000 representing 19% of total ICG sales;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Formation of strategic alliance with MDS Pharma Services Early Clinical Research centers;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Addition of two key positions, a medical director and vice president of sales;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Transition of ICG sensor manufacturing to Vermed;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Publication of several articles in Congestive Heart Failure; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Presented 3 significant ICG studies at various medical conferences.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



During 2004, we began to focus our business on the following two principal operating segments:



ICG Segment



The ICG segment consists primarily of the development, manufacture and sales of the BioZ ICG Monitor, BioZ ICG Module and
associated BioZtect sensors. These devices use ICG technology to noninvasively measure the hearts mechanical characteristics by monitoring the hearts ability to deliver blood to the body. These products are used principally by physicians
to assess, diagnose, and treat cardiovascular disease and are sold to physicians and hospitals throughout the world. With the recent acquisition of Medis on June 2, 2004, the ICG segment now also includes the Medis diagnostic and monitoring devices
such as the Niccomo, Cardioscreen monitor and the Rheoscreen family of measurement devices. Medis products are sold internationally to physicians, researchers and equipment manufacturers. We derive our ICG segment revenue primarily from the sale of
our BioZ ICG Monitors and associated sensors, which are consumed each time a patient test is performed. During 2004, 19% of our ICG revenue came from our disposable ICG sensors, and that percentage has increased each year from approximately 4% in
1999, to 6% in 2000, 9% in 2001, 12% in 2002 and 17% in 2003. We have now shipped nearly 3.3 million ICG sensor sets to customers since introducing the BioZ in 1997. We employ a workforce of clinical application specialists (CAS) who are responsible
for driving customer satisfaction and use of the BioZ ICG Systems. We believe our CAS investment has served to accelerate the growth of our ICG sensor business, which should improve the predictability of our revenue, earnings, and cash flow.



ECG Segment



The ECG segment designs, manufactures and sells electrocardiogram electrode
sensors and related supplies through our Vermed division acquired on March 22, 2004. Revenue is generated primarily by ECG sensor sales that are used principally in electrocardiogram and other diagnostic procedures for cardiology, electrotherapy,



29



---

##### Table of Contents

sleep testing, neurology and general purpose diagnostic testing. The products are sold to a diverse client base of medical suppliers, facilities and
physicians. We believe that the acquisition will improve on our predictability of operating results by increasing the recurring sensor revenue mix of our business. When combined with our ICG sensor sales, the disposable sensor revenue stream
comprised 32% of our overall Company revenue in 2004.



Net
Sales of ICG SegmentNet sales were $34,260,000, $30,332,000, and $23,523,000 for 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, representing growth of 13% in 2004 over 2003 and 29% growth in 2003 over 2002. The sales growth in both years was
achieved primarily through more BioZ placements by our domestic direct sales force and distributors and increasing disposable BioZtect® sensor revenue from our growing installed base of ICG monitors. In addition, the Medis acquisition contributed about two percentage points of growth in
2004 over 2003.



Altogether, we sold 1,124 ICG Monitors and
Modules in 2004, up from 805 in 2003 and 645 in 2002, increasing the total number of BioZ Monitors and ICG Modules to over 5,000.



In March 1998, we received 510(k) marketing clearance for our BioZ ICG Monitor. The BioZ ICG Monitor incorporates our Z MARC® algorithm, which allows the system to sense and modulate values on patients
with over-compliant or under-compliant aortas. The BioZ ICG Monitor accounted for 75% of our overall ICG revenues in 2004, compared with 80% and 85% of our sales in 2003 and 2002, respectively. The fluctuation in the percentage of BioZ sales is due
to increasing sales of our disposable sensors and BioZ ICG Modules, as well as the addition of Medis ICG product sales during the second half of 2004.



The BioZ ICG Module is a custom plug-in module for the GE Healthcare Solar and Dash patient monitors. During 2004, we sold 233 BioZ ICG Modules, up from 8
Modules in 2003. There were no Modules sold in 2002. The significant increase in the current year is primarily due to BioZ ICG Module placements by our strategic partner GE Healthcare along with a 13 BioZ ICG module end user sale to the VA Hospital
in San Antonio, Texas sold by our direct sales force. GE Healthcare has now sold to end users the inventory of 761 BioZ ICG Modules purchased from us under a minimum purchase commitment made by GE in 2001.



Net sales by our domestic direct sales force, which targets physician offices
and hospitals, increased 8% in 2004 with sales of $30,889,000, from $28,542,000 in 2003, and increased 28% in 2003 over 2002 sales of $22,212,000.



Following an 18% increase in unit productivity by our direct sales force in 2003, we experienced a 17% decline in unit productivity in 2004 due to the
hiring of new sales associates and clinical application specialists in the second half of 2004, increasing the average number of our field sales force by 20%. We believe that this investment in personnel will result in more rapid unit placement
growth in the future as the newer sales associates gain experience in selling the BioZ products.



BioZ sales are also affected by third-party leasing incentive programs, targeted sales promotions, and the sales support of our clinical application
specialists. These clinical application specialists assist in three primary areas: pre-sales activities including demonstrations, post-sales activities such as initial set-up and training for physician and staff, and ongoing customer support to
maintain customer satisfaction and increase recurring sales of our proprietary disposable sensor.



Each time our BioZ ICG products are used, disposable sets of four BioZtect sensors are required. This recurring ICG sensor revenue continued to grow in
2004 as a percentage of our overall ICG sales, up 26% to $6,520,000, representing 19% of ICG net sales (16% of consolidated net sales). ICG sensor sales for 2003 were $5,170,000, representing 17% of net sales, up from $2,858,000 or 12% of net sales
in 2002. We offer a Discount Sensor Program to our domestic outpatient customers that provide significant discounts and a fixed price on sensor purchases in exchange for minimum monthly sensor purchase commitments. As the installed base of BioZ
equipment grows, we expect the revenue generated by our disposable BioZtect sensors will continue to increase as well.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Net sales of our ICG products internationally, including Medis product sales, increased by $1,280,000 in
2004 to $2,839,000, up 82% from 2003. In 2004, Medis contributed $730,000 of this increase. In 2003, international sales totaled $1,559,000, an increase of $378,000 or 32% over international sales of $1,181,000 in 2002.



Sales to our domestic strategic partners were $532,000, $231,000 and $130,000
for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Our agreement with GEMS-IT called for annual minimum purchase commitments that expired in 2001 and therefore sales in 2002 and 2003 were significantly less as they sold products from their inventory.



Included in ICG net sales is revenue derived from extended
warranty contracts, spare parts, accessories and non-warranty repairs of our BioZ systems of $739,000 in 2004, $764,000 in 2003 and $657,000 in 2002.



Net Sales of ECG SegmentNet sales of ECG electrodes for 2004 was $6,728,000, which resulted from the acquisition of Vermed during the second
quarter 2004. The acquisition of Vermed contributed 22 percentage points to the consolidated net sales growth in 2004.



Gross Margin of ICG SegmentGross margin was $26,665,000, $23,210,000 and $17,378,000 for the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
As a percentage of net sales, gross margins have improved steadily to 77.8% in 2004 from 76.5% in 2003 and 73.9% in 2002. The improved gross margin percentage has resulted from several factors including:



| |  |  | improved manufacturing efficiencies as the number of systems we produce has increased;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reduced manufacturing engineering expenses in 2004 and 2003 related to supporting newly released products;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an increase of 10% and 20% in the average sales price of our disposable sensor in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and a 21% decrease in the cost negotiated with our supplier in 2003;
and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | lower actual warranty costs per unit in 2004
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



During the fourth quarter 2004, we commenced the transition of the BioZtect ICG disposable sensor manufacturing to our recently acquired Vermed division.
We believe that this will not only allow us to benefit from the synergies of the efficiencies in sensor manufacturing, but should reduce our future cost of disposable sensors.



In the long term, we do not expect our gross margin percentage to continue to increase. As the market begins to mature and
penetration increases, we believe that prices will naturally decline, as ICG technology becomes more of a standard of care, driving our gross margin to lower levels. The commercial release of our BioZ Dx, which received FDA 510(k) clearance in
December 2004, should serve to support our BioZ System average sales prices, however, because we purchase a portion of the system from Philips, the manufactured cost of the BioZ Dx will be higher than the BioZ.com.



Gross Margin of ECG SegmentWe acquired Vermed in the
second quarter 2004 and it contributed gross margin of $2,686,000 in 2004, representing 39.9% of net ECG sales. Based on its current customer base, we do not anticipate significant changes in the gross margin percentage for this business



Research and Development of ICG SegmentOur investment in
research and development for the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $4,268,000, $3,272,000 and $2,423,000, respectively. The 30% increase in 2004 over 2003 and 35% increase in comparing 2003 to 2002 are due primarily to the hiring of additional
engineering and research personnel, including the Medis personnel in the second half of 2004. This provides us with the capacity to focus increased attention on the development of new products and product enhancements including the development and
testing of the BioZ Dx, which is a joint ICG/ECG product development with Philips. Phase I, the ICG portion, of the co-developed Philips ICG/ECG monitor received FDA 510(k) clearance



31



---

##### Table of Contents

in December 2004. Development of the BioZ Dx consumed most of these resources in 2003 and 2004. Our investments in research, product development and clinical
studies were lower in 2002, as the development of the GEMS-IT BioZ ICG Module, which required substantial outside engineering services was concluded and initial expenditures on several clinical studies leveled out.



Research and Development for ECG SegmentOur investment in
research, product development in the ECG segment was $85,000 in 2004. These expenditures are primarily related to research, design and testing of product enhancements and extensions as well as custom modifications for private label products.



Selling and Marketing for ICG SegmentSelling and
marketing expenses for the ICG segment increased to $17,514,000 in 2004 from $15,249,000 in 2003 and $12,892,000 in 2002, up 15% and 18% respectively. The ICG segment expense growth in both years was primarily due to an overall 20% increase in the
average number of field sales personnel, higher commissions earned on increased sales by our direct sales force and additional provision for doubtful accounts resulting from higher accounts receivable balances and slower payments by our customers.



As a percentage of ICG net sales, these expenses were 51% in
2004, 50% in 2003, and 55% in 2002. Higher net ICG sales and increased sales productivity in 2003, coupled with the 81% growth in recurring sensor revenue, contributed to the improvement in sales and marketing as a percentage of net sales. The
second half of 2004 was one of investment in the expansion of our sales and clinical team, which we believe will improve productivity by allowing our territory sales managers to focus on new systems sales, as our clinical team drives recurring
revenue through support of our expanding customer base.



Over
the next several years, our objective is to increase field sales productivity and thereby reduce selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of net sales. With the current operating leverage in our business, we believe this provides a significant
opportunity to improve net income and cash flow.



Selling
and Marketing for ECG SegmentSelling and marketing expenses for the ECG segment were $582,000 representing 9% as a percentage of ECG net sales in 2004. These expenditures are primarily for our ECG telemarketing, customer service and the
OEM sales team.



Selling and Marketing for Corporate
UnallocatedCorporate unallocated selling and marketing expenses were $261,000, $299,000 and $232,000 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These expenses include costs for the corporate business development function, which assists in
targeting new market opportunities through acquisitions and complementary technologies and technology development.



General and Administrative for ICG SegmentGeneral and administrative expenses for the ICG segment were $1,654,000, $1,545,000 and $1,366,000
in 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses remained relatively flat at 5% in 2004 and 2003 and 6% in 2002. The overall expense increase in each of the three years is primarily due to
additional headcount and in 2004, the inclusion of Medis administrative expenses of $66,000. We continue to focus on ongoing cost containment in all areas of our business with specific emphasis in the areas that are not directly related to sales
growth.



General and Administrative for ECG
SegmentGeneral and administrative expenses for the ECG segment in 2004 were $412,000, or 6% as a percentage of ECG net sales.



General and Administrative for Corporate UnallocatedCorporate unallocated items are comprised of general corporate expenses of a non-segment
related nature. These unallocated expenses were $1,317,000, $517,000 and $455,000 for 2004, 2003 and 2002. The significant increase in 2004 is primarily due to internal costs including additional headcount, outside consulting and accounting service
fees related to compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including Section 404 relating to internal controls. We anticipate that these increased regulatory compliance requirements will continue to negatively impact our
general and administrative costs in future periods. Also included are tax consulting fees related to the IRS Section 382 analysis of our net operating loss carry-forwards.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

Amortization of Intangible Assets for ICG SegmentIn 2004, the ICG segment had $66,000 of
amortization expense, which is primarily due to identified intangible assets resulting from the acquisition of Medis during the second half of 2004. There was no intangible asset amortization in 2003 or 2002.



Amortization of Intangible Assets for ECG SegmentAmortization
expense for intangible assets for the ECG segment was $268,000 in 2004 related to identified intangible assets obtained in the Vermed acquisition in the second quarter 2004. There was no intangible asset amortization in 2003 or 2002.



Other Income (Expense) for the ICG segmentOther ICG income
(expense) was $171,000, $230,000, and ($60,000) in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, other income included interest income of $255,000 offset by a $56,000 foreign currency translation loss resulting from the revaluation of the Medis
deferred acquisition liability. The higher interest income in 2004 and 2003 is primarily due to more interest earned on internally financed equipment leases. Interest expense for the ICG segment was $27,000, $15,000 and $10,000 for 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively and is related to interest on capital leases.



Other Income (Expense) for Corporate UnallocatedCorporate unallocated net other expense was ($147,000) in 2004 compared with net other income of $121,000 and $361,000, respectively in 2003 and 2002. The increased net other
expense in 2004 is primarily the result of $228,000 in interest expense which includes interest expense and a commitment fee related to the bank term loan in connection with the Vermed acquisition.



Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interest for ICG
SegmentIncome before income taxes and minority interest for the ICG segment was $3,404,000, $3,374,000 and $637,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The improvement for 2004 over 2003 was primarily the result of higher sales, improved
gross margins offset by higher operating expenses. The improvement for 2003 over 2002 also resulted from higher ICG sales and improved gross margins.



Income Before Income Taxes for ECG SegmentIncome before income taxes for the ECG segment for 2004 was $1,271,000 representing a 19%
before tax return on ECG net sales.



Income Tax Benefit
(Provision)Based on a growing history of profitability and our projections of future taxable earnings and other factors, in 2004 we determined that it is more likely than not that we will benefit from the use of our net operating
loss carryforwards and therefore, eliminated our valuation allowance on our related deferred tax assets by $13,801,000 and realized a net income tax benefit of $7,209,000 in 2004. In 2003 and 2002, we provided $227,000 and $1,000 for income taxes,
respectively.



Minority Interest in Income of
SubsidiaryMinority interest in income of Medis was $37,000 and represents the 20% minority share interests retained by the sellers.



Net Incomewas $10,123,000 in 2004, up 313% from $2,452,000 in 2003. The improvement in net income for 2004 was primarily the result of an income
tax benefit of $7,209,000, higher ICG sales, along with the net income contributed by the acquisitions of Vermed and Medis. Net income was $2,452,000 in 2003, up 691% from $310,000 in 2002 as a result of higher ICG sales, improved gross margin, and
controlled operating expense growth.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was
$4,365,000, $2,229,000 and $(143,000) in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, the net cash provided by operations was due to an increase in net income, higher accounts payable and accrued compensation and expense balances and the tax benefit
from the exercise of stock options and warrants offset by deferred income tax and increased accounts receivable balances. In addition, the increase in deferred rent is due to a tenant improvement allowance received as reimbursement of leasehold
improvements in accordance with the amended lease of our San Diego facility that was accounted for as a lease



33



---

##### Table of Contents

incentive in the fourth quarter 2004. The increase in 2003 as compared to 2002 operating cash flow is primarily due to increased net income, improved
accounts receivable collections and tighter inventory flow management, offset partially by quicker payments to our vendors. In 2004, we used excess cash for the acquisitions of Vermed and Medis. In 2003 and 2002, we invested our excess cash and cash
equivalents in short-term highly liquid investments.



In 2004,
2003 and 2002, we invested $1,392,000, $510,000 and $228,000, respectively, in property, plant and equipment. In 2004, the increase was due to investment in ICG sensor manufacturing equipment at our Vermed division, leasehold improvements due to the
expansion of our San Diego facility, continued investments in computer software and equipment to continually upgrade our network, information system safeguarding and security capabilities in order to comply with the more stringent requirements of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In 2003, much of the increased investment in capital assets was for a new computer information system that was implemented in the fourth quarter 2003. In June 1997, we entered into a five-year lease for an 18,000 square-foot
manufacturing facility that also houses our research, development, marketing, sales and administrative activities. The lease was amended in June 2004 to extend the lease through December 31, 2007, and includes an additional 15,000 square-feet of
expansion space. The original contractual lease payments are $22,000 per month, but with the expansion space, it increased in November 2004 to $28,000 per month for 12 months and then increases to $35,000 per month in November 2005 with a 3% annual
increase on each anniversary.



We generated $8,203,000,
$767,000 and $849,000 from financing activities in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This includes the exercise of stock options and warrants of $2,937,000, $757,000 and $944,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, we borrowed $7,000,000
on a new term loan for the Vermed acquisition in March 2004, and paid the balance down by $1,767,000, which included fixed principal repayments of $1,167,000 and pre-payments of $600,000.



In connection with the acquisition of Vermed on March 22, 2004, we modified our revolving credit line to increase the amount
available under the line to $5 million. Under the terms of the revolving credit line, we are required to maintain certain tangible net worth, liabilities to tangible net worth and debt service coverage ratios, as well as maintain a minimum liquidity
balance. At November 30, 2004, we were in compliance with the covenants and do not believe that any covenants are reasonably likely to materially limit our ability to borrow on the credit line. As of November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, there were no
outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line.



The
revolving credit line was extended in August 2004 to a maturity date of September 14, 2005 and the term loan has a maturity date of March 22, 2008. The revolving credit line and the term loan each bear interest at a rate of one half percent above
the banks monthly prime rate and are subject to adjustment on a monthly basis. The obligations of the Company under the revolving credit line and the term loan are secured by a pledge of all of the Companys assets. Additionally, with the
acquisition of Medis on June 2, 2004, we issued letters of credit for $1,009,000 (760,000 Euros) to secure the deferred acquisition payments due to the minority shareholders of Medis to be paid annually over five years through 2009. The credit
available under our credit line is reduced by $1.1 million to cover these letters of credit.



We have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $23.3 million for federal income tax purposes that begin to expire in 2011. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 contains provisions that limit the amount of federal net
operating loss carryforwards that can be used in any given year in the event of specified occurrences, including significant ownership changes. We retained independent tax specialists to perform an analysis to determine the applicable annual
limitation applied to the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards due to ownership changes as defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382 that may have occurred. The IRC Section 382 study and analysis was completed in the fourth
quarter 2004, and as a result of this study, we do not believe that the ownership change limitations would impair our ability to use our net operating losses against our current forecasted taxable income. A valuation allowance had been established
for the full amount of the deferred tax asset created by these carryforwards. However, based on historical and forecasted taxable earnings, the



34



---

##### Table of Contents

conclusion of identified uncertainties such as the integration of recent acquisitions, increased regulatory compliance requirements, manufacturing transition
of our ICG sensors to Vermed, conclusion of multi-year clinical studies, and completion of the development and FDA approval of our BioZ Dx, the valuation allowance was removed, resulting in a significant income tax benefit in the current year.



We believe that over the next 12 months our current cash and
cash equivalents, operating cash flows and availability under our revolving line of credit will be sufficient to support our ongoing operating and investing requirements such as ongoing research and development efforts, expansion of our direct sales
force, capital expenditures and to meet the working capital requirements of anticipated future growth. As we continue to pursue opportunities to acquire or make investments in other technologies, products and businesses, we may choose to finance
such acquisitions or investments by incurring debt or issuing equity. Our long-term liquidity will depend on our ability to commercialize the BioZ and other diagnostic products and may require us to raise additional funds through public or private
financing, bank loans, collaborative relationships or other arrangements.



Contractual Obligations



The following table
summarizes our contractual obligations at November 30, 2004, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):



|                              |  |       |       |                 |   |           |  |           |       |                 |   |     |  |   |    
|----------------------------- |  | ----- | ----- | --------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ----- | --------------- | - | --- |  | - | ---
|                              |  | Total |       | Less than1 year |   | 1-3 years |  | 3-5 years |       | Morethan 5years
|Long-term debt obligations    |  | $     | 5,645 |                 | $ | 1,765     |  | $         | 3,515 |                 | $ | 36  |  | $ | 329
|Capital lease obligations     |  |       | 85    |                 |   | 20        |  |           | 35    |                 |   | 30  |  |   |   
|Operating lease obligations   |  |       | 1,312 |                 |   | 352       |  |           | 876   |                 |   | 84  |  |   |   
|Deferred acquisition payments |  |       | 861   |                 |   | 191       |  |           | 353   |                 |   | 317 |  |   |   
|Warranty obligations          |  |       | 409   |                 |   | 99        |  |           | 42    |                 |   | 268 |  |   |   
|                              |  |       |       |                 |   |           |  |           |       |                 |   |     |  |   |    
|Total                         |  | $     | 8,312 |                 | $ | 2,427     |  | $         | 4,821 |                 | $ | 735 |  | $ | 329
|                              |  |       |       |                 |   |           |  |           |       |                 |   |     |  |   |    



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



We are not a party to off-balance sheet arrangements
other than operating leases, and have not engaged in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts, and are not a party to any transaction with persons or activities that derive benefits, except as disclosed herein, from their
non-independent relationships with the Company.



Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates



Revenue
RecognitionWe recognize revenue from the sale of product when persuasive evidence of a sale exists, the product has been shipped which coincides with transfer of title and risk of loss, the sales price is fixed and determinable and
collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We sell some products under long-term financing arrangements and recognize the present value of the minimum payments using the rate implicit in the financing agreement as revenue at the
time of sale and recognize interest income over the term of the contract. Revenue for extended warranty contracts beyond our standard warranty is recognized evenly over the life of the contract. Amounts received for warranty contracts that have not
yet been earned, are recorded as deferred revenue.



Use
of EstimatesThe preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these estimates and assumptions upon historical experience and existing, known circumstances we believe to be reasonable. Actual results could
vary from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations:



Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales ReturnsWe maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover estimated losses resulting
from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We determine the adequacy of this allowance by regularly reviewing the accounts receivable aging and historical write-off rates. If customer payment timeframes were to deteriorate,
additional allowances for doubtful accounts would be required.



Also included in the allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate of potential future product returns related to current period product sales recorded as a reduction of revenue. We analyze the rate of historical returns when evaluating
the adequacy of the allowance for product returns.



Inventory ObsolescenceWe maintain a reserve for excess, slow moving, and obsolete inventory as well as inventory with a carrying value in excess of its net realizable value. We value our inventory at the lower of cost,
using the first-in, first-out method, or market. We review inventory on hand quarterly and record provisions for excess and obsolete inventory based on several factors, including our current assessment of future product demand, historical
experience, and product expiration.



Valuation of
Goodwill and Other Intangible AssetsWe are required to perform an annual review for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Goodwill is considered to be impaired if we determine that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. In addition to the annual review, an interim review is required if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Examples of such events or circumstances include:



| |  |  | a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a significant decline in our projected revenue or cash flows;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | unanticipated competition;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | a loss of key personnel;
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | a more-likely-than-not expectation that a reporting unit or a significant portion of a reporting unit will be sold or otherwise disposed of; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the testing for recoverability under Statement 144 of a significant asset group within a reporting unit.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Valuation of Long-Lived AssetsWe assess the impairment of long-lived assets, consisting of
property, plant and equipment, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples of such events or circumstances include:



| |  |  | the assets ability to continue to generate income from operations and positive cash flow in future periods;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | significant changes in our strategic business objectives and utilization of the asset(s); and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



There were no such impairments in the current year. If the assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment we recognize is the amount by which the
carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. In addition, we base useful lives and amortization or depreciation expense on our estimate of the period that the assets will generate revenue or otherwise be used by us.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

We also periodically review the lives assigned to our intangible assets to ensure that our initial
estimates do not exceed any revised estimated periods from which we expect to realize cash flows from the technologies. If a change were to occur in any of the above-mentioned factors or estimates, the likelihood of a material change in our reported
results would increase.



Warranty
CostWe maintain a provision for product warranties. Estimates for warranty costs are calculated based primarily upon historical warranty experience and are evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine the appropriateness of such
assumptions. Warranty provisions are adjusted from time to time when actual warranty claim experience differs from our estimates.



Income TaxesWe use the asset and liability approach to account for income taxes. This methodology recognizes deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax base of assets and liabilities and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We then record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. We consider future taxable income in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, which requires the use of estimates. If we determine during any
period that we could realize a larger net deferred tax asset than the recorded amount, we would adjust the deferred tax asset to record a charge to income for the period.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 132(R), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.This statement revises
employers disclosures about pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans, but retains the disclosure requirements contained in SFAS 132, which it replaces. It requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows,
and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2003. The
adoption of this statement had no effect on our financial statement disclosures, financial position or results of operations.



In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51. This
interpretation replaces Interpretation No. 46 issued in January 2003. It addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities, which have certain characteristics. This interpretation is required in financial statements of
public entities that have interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003.The application of this interpretation had no effect on our financial position or results of
operations.



In November 2003, the FASB issued EITF 03-12,
Impact of FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. EITF 03-12 states that the minimum lease payments are the difference between the proceeds upon
the equipments initial transfer and the amount of the residual value guarantee as of the first exercise date of the guarantee. The application of this guidance had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.



In December 2003, the FASB issued EITF 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.A consensus was reached regarding disclosures about unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt and equity securities accounted for under SFAS 115,Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and SFAS 124,Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations. The application of this guidance had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.



In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment.This statement is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supercedes APB 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. SFAS 123R establishes standards on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains



37



---

##### Table of Contents

employee services in share-based payment transactions. This statement requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award
of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is usually the vesting period. SFAS 123R
also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. We are
currently evaluating what the impact of the adoption of this statement will have on our financial position and results of operations. We intend to implement this statement in our fourth quarter of 2005.



In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151,Inventory Costs, which is
effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. This statement amends ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that these items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal. In addition, allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion must be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. We are currently evaluating what the impact, if any, of the adoption of this statement will have on our financial position and results of
operations and plan to implement this effective fiscal year 2005.



In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS 153 amends APB 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, which is based on
the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in APB 29 included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS 153 amends APB 29 to eliminate the exception for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the
entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The adoption of this statement had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.



In November 2004, the FASB issued EITF 03-13, Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of SFAS 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations. This guidance is applied to a component of an enterprise that is either disposed of or classified as held for sale in
fiscal periods after December 15, 2004. The application of this guidance had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.



In November 2004, the FASB issued EITF 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share which is
effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. This consensus addresses when contingently convertible instruments should be included in diluted earnings per share. The application of this guidance had no effect on our
financial position or results of operations.



In October 2004,
the FASB issued EITF 04-10, Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments That Do Not Meet the Quantitative Thresholds. The consensus addresses the issue of how an enterprise should evaluate the aggregation criteria in
paragraph 17 of SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, when determining whether operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds may be aggregated. The effective date of this issue has
been delayed and is anticipated to occur in 2005 to coincide with the final issuance of the FSP (FASB Staff Position), which will provide guidance in determining whether two or more operating segments have similar economic characteristics. However,
earlier adoption is permitted. The application of this guidance had no effect on our financial position or results of operations.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE | AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------



Interest Rate Sensitivity



The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal, while at the same time, maximize the income we receive from our investments
without significantly increasing risk. In the normal course of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage our exposure to changes in the fair value of our investments. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate
derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risks, market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing
in investment grade securities. Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this
risk, we maintain substantially our entire portfolio of cash equivalents in commercial paper, certificates of deposit, money market and mutual funds. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates; however,
due to the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that there is no material market risk exposure. As of November 30, 2004, we do not have any short-term investments.



During 2004, our primary exposure to market risk was interest rate risk associated with our variable rate debt. See
Item 7. Managements Discussion and AnalysisLiquidity and Capital Resources for further description of this debt instrument. A 1% change in interest rates on variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense
fluctuating by approximately $43,000 in fiscal 2004.



Foreign Currency
Exchange Rate Risk



We are exposed to market risks related
to foreign currency exchange rates, and have concluded that the market risk exposure is not material at this time.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|------- | -------------------------------------------



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors and Shareholders

CardioDynamics International Corporation:



We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CardioDynamics International Corporation and subsidiaries as
of November 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2004. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CardioDynamics International Corporation and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.



/s/ KPMG LLP



San Diego, California

February 28, 2005



40



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In
thousands)



|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                        |  | November 30, |        
|                                                                                                                                                        |  | 2004         |         |   | 2003 |  
|Assets (Pledged)                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                         |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                               |  | $            | 6,801   |   |      | $ | 4,762   |  
|Short-term investments, available for sale                                                                                                              |  |              |        |   |      |   | 4,583   |  
|Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,400 in 2004 and $1,940 in 2003                                                        |  |              | 11,674  |   |      |   | 9,560   |  
|Inventory, net                                                                                                                                          |  |              | 4,647   |   |      |   | 3,163   |  
|Current portion of long-term and installment receivables                                                                                                |  |              | 1,518   |   |      |   | 1,723   |  
|Deferred tax assets, current portion                                                                                                                    |  |              | 2,046   |   |      |   |        |  
|Other current assets                                                                                                                                    |  |              | 571     |   |      |   | 322     |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                    |  |              | 27,257  |   |      |   | 24,113  |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Long-term receivables and note receivable, net                                                                                                          |  |              | 1,248   |   |      |   | 1,781   |  
|Property, plant and equipment, net                                                                                                                      |  |              | 5,123   |   |      |   | 634     |  
|Intangible assets, net                                                                                                                                  |  |              | 4,550   |   |      |   | 90      |  
|Goodwill                                                                                                                                                |  |              | 11,186  |   |      |   |        |  
|Deferred tax assets                                                                                                                                     |  |              | 8,595   |   |      |   |        |  
|Other assets                                                                                                                                            |  |              | 71      |   |      |   | 30      |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                            |  | $            | 58,030  |   |      | $ | 26,648  |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Liabilities and Shareholders Equity                                                                                                                    |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                    |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Accounts payable, including related party of $145 in 2004 and $77 in 2003                                                                               |  | $            | 2,781   |   |      | $ | 795     |  
|Accrued expenses and other current liabilities                                                                                                          |  |              | 606     |   |      |   | 180     |  
|Accrued compensation                                                                                                                                    |  |              | 2,009   |   |      |   | 1,421   |  
|Income taxes payable                                                                                                                                    |  |              | 37      |   |      |   | 44      |  
|Current portion deferred revenue                                                                                                                        |  |              | 256     |   |      |   | 316     |  
|Current portion of deferred rent                                                                                                                        |  |              |        |   |      |   | 8       |  
|Current portion of deferred acquisition payments                                                                                                        |  |              | 191     |   |      |   |        |  
|Provision for warranty repairscurrent                                                                                                                  |  |              | 99      |   |      |   | 138     |  
|Current portion long-term debt                                                                                                                          |  |              | 1,785   |   |      |   | 7       |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                               |  |              | 7,764   |   |      |   | 2,909   |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Long-term portion of deferred revenue                                                                                                                   |  |              | 90      |   |      |   | 104     |  
|Long-term portion of deferred rent                                                                                                                      |  |              | 323     |   |      |   | 102     |  
|Long-term portion of deferred acquisition payments                                                                                                      |  |              | 670     |   |      |   |        |  
|Provision for warranty repairslong-term                                                                                                                |  |              | 310     |   |      |   | 496     |  
|Long-term debt, less current portion                                                                                                                    |  |              | 3,945   |   |      |   | 17      |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total long-term liabilities                                                                                                                             |  |              | 5,338   |   |      |   | 719     |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                                                       |  |              | 13,102  |   |      |   | 3,628   |  
|Commitments and contingencies                                                                                                                           |  |              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Minority interest                                                                                                                                       |  |              | 194     |   |      |   |        |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Shareholders equity:                                                                                                                                   |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |             
|Preferred stock, 18,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding at November 30, 2004 or 2003                                                 |  |              |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding 48,721 shares at November 30, 2004 and 46,518 shares at November
30, 2003 |  |              | 62,063  |   |      |   | 50,638  |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)                                                                                                           |  |              | 149     |   |      |   | (17     | )
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                     |  |              | (17,478 | ) |      |   | (27,601 | )
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total shareholders equity                                                                                                                              |  |              | 44,734  |   |      |   | 23,020  |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Total liabilities and shareholders equity                                                                                                              |  | $            | 58,030  |   |      | $ | 26,648  |  
|                                                                                                                                                        |  |              |         |   |      |   |         |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)



|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                 |  | For the years ended November 30, |       
|                                                                 |  | 2004                             |        |   | 2003 |   |        | 2002 | 
|Net sales                                                        |  | $                                | 40,988 |   |      | $ | 30,332 |      |  | $ | 23,523 |  
|Cost of sales                                                    |  |                                  | 11,637 |   |      |   | 7,122  |      |  |   | 6,145  |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Gross margin                                                     |  |                                  | 29,351 |   |      |   | 23,210 |      |  |   | 17,378 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Operating expenses:                                              |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Research and development                                         |  |                                  | 4,353  |   |      |   | 3,272  |      |  |   | 2,423  |  
|Selling and marketing                                            |  |                                  | 18,357 |   |      |   | 15,548 |      |  |   | 13,124 |  
|General and administrative                                       |  |                                  | 3,383  |   |      |   | 2,062  |      |  |   | 1,821  |  
|Amortization of intangible assets                                |  |                                  | 334    |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Total operating expenses                                         |  |                                  | 26,427 |   |      |   | 20,882 |      |  |   | 17,368 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Income from operations                                           |  |                                  | 2,924  |   |      |   | 2,328  |      |  |   | 10     |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Other income (expense):                                          |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Interest income                                                  |  |                                  | 339    |   |      |   | 366    |      |  |   | 361    |  
|Interest expense                                                 |  |                                  | (255   | ) |      |   | (15    | )    |  |   | (10    | )
|Foreign currency loss                                            |  |                                  | (56    | ) |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Other, net                                                       |  |                                  | (1     | ) |      |   |       |      |  |   | (50    | )
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Total other income                                               |  |                                  | 27     |   |      |   | 351    |      |  |   | 301    |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Income before income taxes and minority interest                 |  |                                  | 2,951  |   |      |   | 2,679  |      |  |   | 311    |  
|Minority interest in income of subsidiary                        |  |                                  | (37    | ) |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Income tax benefit (provision)                                   |  |                                  | 7,209  |   |      |   | (227   | )    |  |   | (1     | )
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net income                                                       |  | $                                | 10,123 |   |      | $ | 2,452  |      |  | $ | 310    |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net income per common share:                                     |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                                            |  | $                                | .21    |   |      | $ | .05    |      |  | $ | .01    |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                                          |  | $                                | .21    |   |      | $ | .05    |      |  | $ | .01    |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Weighted-average number of shares used in per share calculation: |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Basic                                                            |  |                                  | 47,668 |   |      |   | 46,248 |      |  |   | 46,087 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Diluted                                                          |  |                                  | 49,164 |   |      |   | 47,607 |      |  |   | 47,458 |  
|                                                                 |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



42



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)



|                                                                      |  |              |  |        |                                              |   |  |                     |     |   |                           |   |         |                      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ------ | -------------------------------------------- | - |  | ------------------- | --- | - | ------------------------- | - | ------- | -------------------- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                      |  | Common Stock |  |        | Accumulated OtherComprehensive Income (Loss) |   |  | Accumulated Deficit |     |   | TotalShareholders Equity |   |         | Comprehensive Income | 
|                                                                      |  | Shares       |  | Amount |                                              |   |  |                     |    
|Balance at November 30, 2001                                          |  | 45,798       |  |        | 48,786                                       |   |  |                     |    |   |                           | $ | (30,363 | )                    |  | $ | 18,423 |   |  | $ |       |  
|Compensatory stock options granted                                    |  |             |  |        | 70                                           |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 70     |   |  |   |       |  
|Common stock issuance costs                                           |  |             |  |        | (26                                          | ) |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | (26    | ) |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stockupon exercise of stock options and warrants  |  | 373          |  |        | 944                                          |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 944    |   |  |   |       |  
|Unrealized gain on marketable securities                              |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     | 3   |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 3      |   |  |   | 3      |  
|Net income                                                            |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   | 310     |                      |  |   | 310    |   |  |   | 310    |  
|                                                                      |  |              |  |        |                                              |   |  |                     |     |   |                           |   |         |                      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at November 30, 2002                                          |  | 46,171       |  |        | 49,774                                       |   |  |                     | 3   |   |                           |   | (30,053 | )                    |  |   | 19,724 |   |  |   | 313    |  
|Compensatory stock options granted                                    |  |             |  |        | 50                                           |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 50     |   |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs                       |  |             |  |        | 26                                           |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 26     |   |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stockupon exercise of stock                       |  | 347          |  |        | 757                                          |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 757    |   |  |   |       |  
|Stock options income tax benefit                                      |  |             |  |        | 31                                           |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 31     |   |  |   |       |  
|Unrealized loss on marketable securities                              |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     | (20 | ) |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | (20    | ) |  |   | (20    | )
|Net income                                                            |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   | 2,452   |                      |  |   | 2,452  |   |  |   | 2,452  |  
|                                                                      |  |              |  |        |                                              |   |  |                     |     |   |                           |   |         |                      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at November 30, 2003                                          |  | 46,518       |  |        | 50,638                                       |   |  |                     | (17 | ) |                           |   | (27,601 | )                    |  |   | 23,020 |   |  |   | 2,432  |  
|Compensatory stock options granted                                    |  |             |  |        | 12                                           |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 12     |   |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs                       |  |             |  |        | (22                                          | ) |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | (22    | ) |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and warrants |  | 1,357        |  |        | 2,937                                        |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 2,937  |   |  |   |       |  
|Issuance of common stock for purchase of businesses                   |  | 846          |  |        | 5,136                                        |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 5,136  |   |  |   |       |  
|Stock options income tax benefit                                      |  |             |  |        | 3,362                                        |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 3,362  |   |  |   |       |  
|Unrealized gain on marketable securities                              |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     | 17  |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 17     |   |  |   | 17     |  
|Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of deferred taxes of $95 |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     | 149 |   |                           |   |        |                      |  |   | 149    |   |  |   | 149    |  
|Net income                                                            |  |             |  |        |                                             |   |  |                     |    |   |                           |   | 10,123  |                      |  |   | 10,123 |   |  |   | 10,123 |  
|                                                                      |  |              |  |        |                                              |   |  |                     |     |   |                           |   |         |                      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at November 30, 2004                                          |  | 48,721       |  | $      | 62,063                                       |   |  | $                   | 149 |   |                           | $ | (17,478 | )                    |  | $ | 44,734 |   |  | $ | 10,289 |  
|                                                                      |  |              |  |        |                                              |   |  |                     |     |   |                           |   |         |                      |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)



|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                            |  | For the years ended November 30, |        
|                                                                                            |  | 2004                             |         |   | 2003 |   |        | 2002 | 
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                                       |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net income                                                                                  |  | $                                | 10,123  |   |      | $ | 2,452  |      |  | $ | 310    |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:           |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Minority interest in income of subsidiary                                                   |  |                                  | 37      |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Benefit for deferred income taxes                                                           |  |                                  | (10,736 | ) |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Tax benefit from exercise of stock options and warrants                                     |  |                                  | 3,362   |   |      |   | 31     |      |  |   |       |  
|Depreciation                                                                                |  |                                  | 484     |   |      |   | 290    |      |  |   | 300    |  
|Amortization of intangible assets                                                           |  |                                  | 334     |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Provision for (reduction in) warranty repairs                                               |  |                                  | (237    | ) |      |   | 301    |      |  |   | 162    |  
|Provision for doubtful accounts                                                             |  |                                  | 413     |   |      |   | 1,429  |      |  |   | 812    |  
|Provision for (reduction in) doubtful long-term receivables                                 |  |                                  | (201    | ) |      |   | (7     | )    |  |   | 54     |  
|Stock based compensation expense                                                            |  |                                  | 12      |   |      |   | 50     |      |  |   | 70     |  
|Other non-cash items                                                                        |  |                                  | 73      |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisitions in 2004: |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Accounts receivable                                                                         |  |                                  | (1,929  | ) |      |   | (2,373 | )    |  |   | (1,788 | )
|Inventory                                                                                   |  |                                  | (392    | ) |      |   | 311    |      |  |   | (572   | )
|Installment and long-term receivables and note receivable                                   |  |                                  | 939     |   |      |   | 412    |      |  |   | (308   | )
|Other current assets                                                                        |  |                                  | (185    | ) |      |   | (100   | )    |  |   | 128    |  
|Other assets                                                                                |  |                                  | (56     | ) |      |   | (68    | )    |  |   | (22    | )
|Accounts payable                                                                            |  |                                  | 1,404   |   |      |   | (733   | )    |  |   | 190    |  
|Accrued expenses and other current liabilities                                              |  |                                  | 376     |   |      |   | 7      |      |  |   | 67     |  
|Accrued compensation                                                                        |  |                                  | 472     |   |      |   | 226    |      |  |   | 292    |  
|Income taxes payable                                                                        |  |                                  | (67     | ) |      |   | 44     |      |  |   |       |  
|Deferred revenue                                                                            |  |                                  | (74     | ) |      |   | (31    | )    |  |   | 40     |  
|Deferred rent                                                                               |  |                                  | 213     |   |      |   | (12    | )    |  |   | 122    |  
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net cash provided by (used) in operating activities                                         |  |                                  | 4,365   |   |      |   | 2,229  |      |  |   | (143   | )
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                                       |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Proceeds from sale of short-term investments                                                |  |                                  | 4,588   |   |      |   | 2,000  |      |  |   | 500    |  
|Purchases of short-term investments                                                         |  |                                  |        |   |      |   | (2,099 | )    |  |   | (5,001 | )
|Purchases of property, plant and equipment                                                  |  |                                  | (1,392  | ) |      |   | (510   | )    |  |   | (228   | )
|Proceeds from sale of fixed assets                                                          |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   | 4      |  
|Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired                                                |  |                                  | (13,750 | ) |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                       |  |                                  | (10,554 | ) |      |   | (609   | )    |  |   | (4,725 | )
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                                       |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Proceeds from issuance of debt                                                              |  | $                                | 7,069   |   |      | $ |       |      |  | $ |       |  
|Repayment of debt                                                                           |  |                                  | (1,781  | ) |      |   | (16    | )    |  |   | (69    | )
|Exercise of stock options and warrants                                                      |  |                                  | 2,937   |   |      |   | 757    |      |  |   | 944    |  
|Issuance of common stock, net                                                               |  |                                  | (22     | ) |      |   | 26     |      |  |   | (26    | )
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                                   |  |                                  | 8,203   |   |      |   | 767    |      |  |   | 849    |  
|                                                                                            |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  



See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(Continued)

(In thousands)





|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                          |  | For the years ended November 30, |        
|                                                                                          |  | 2004                             |         |   | 2003 |   |       | 2002 | 
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents                              |  |                                  | 25      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                      |  |                                  | 2,039   |   |      |   | 2,387 |      |  |   | (4,019 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                                            |  |                                  | 4,762   |   |      |   | 2,375 |      |  |   | 6,394  |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                                                  |  | $                                | 6,801   |   |      | $ | 4,762 |      |  | $ | 2,375  |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                                        |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |        
|Cash payments during the year for:                                                        |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Interest                                                                                  |  | $                                | 276     |   |      | $ | 15    |      |  | $ | 10     |  
|Income taxes                                                                              |  | $                                | 223     |   |      | $ | 150   |      |  | $ | 1      |  
|Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:                  |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, less deferred tax effect |  | $                                | 17      |   |      | $ | (20   | )    |  | $ | 3      |  
|Equipment acquired under capital lease                                                    |  | $                                | 44      |   |      | $ |      |      |  | $ |       |  
|Supplemental non-cash disclosure of purchase of businesses:                               |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                 |  | $                                | 127     |   |      | $ |      |      |  | $ |       |  
|Accounts receivable, net                                                                  |  |                                  | 598     |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Inventory                                                                                 |  |                                  | 1,092   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Other current assets                                                                      |  |                                  | 64      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Property, plant and equipment                                                             |  |                                  | 3,517   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Goodwill                                                                                  |  |                                  | 11,055  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Intangible assets                                                                         |  |                                  | 4,721   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Accounts payable                                                                          |  |                                  | (582    | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Accrued expenses and other current liabilities                                            |  |                                  | (50     | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Accrued compensation                                                                      |  |                                  | (116    | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Income taxes payable                                                                      |  |                                  | (60     | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Provision for warranty repairs                                                            |  |                                  | (12     | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Long-term debt, including current portion                                                 |  |                                  | (386    | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Minority interest                                                                         |  |                                  | (149    | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Total purchase price                                                                      |  |                                  | 19,819  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Less cash paid                                                                            |  |                                  | (13,877 | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|Less deferred acquisition payments                                                        |  |                                  | (806    | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|Common stock issued                                                                       |  | $                                | 5,136   |   |      | $ |      |      |  | $ |       |  
|                                                                                          |  |                                  |         |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  





See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



45



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



(1) Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Description of Business



CardioDynamics International Corporation (CardioDynamics or the Company) is an innovator of an important medical technology called
Impedance Cardiography (ICG). The Company develops, manufactures and markets noninvasive ICG diagnostic and monitoring technologies and electrocardiograph (ECG) electrode sensors. The Company was incorporated as a California corporation in June 1980
and changed its name to CardioDynamics International Corporation in October 1993.



2004 Acquisitions



On
March 22, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities (the Acquired Assets) of the Vermed subsidiary (Vermed) of Vermont Medical, Inc. Vermed is a manufacturer of
electrodes and related supplies used in electrocardiograms and other diagnostic procedures for cardiology, electrotherapy, sleep testing, neurology and general purpose diagnostic testing. On June 2, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of 80%
of all outstanding shares of Medis Medizinische Messtechnik GmbH (Medis). Medis develops, manufactures and sells noninvasive diagnostic and monitoring devices that use ICG technology for cardiovascular diagnostics sold.



Principles of Consolidation



The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CardioDynamics
International Corporation and its majority and wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.



Use of Estimates



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, assessing the following: the valuation of accounts receivables, inventory and long-term receivables, valuation allowance of
deferred tax assets, the ability to estimate warranty obligations, provisions for returns and allowances and the determination of whether collection of revenue arrangements is probable or reasonably assured.



Revenue Recognition



The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of its products to end-users,
distributors and strategic partners when persuasive evidence of a sale exists including; the product is complete, tested and has physically shipped, the sales price is fixed and determinable, the buyer is obligated to pay the total purchase price,
title for the product has transferred to the buyer, collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured, there are no material contingencies or rights of return and the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance.



The Company also sells products under long-term financing
arrangements and recognizes the present value of the minimum payments, based on the interest rate implicit in the financing agreement, as revenue at the time of sale. Deferred interest income is recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the
financing arrangement. Revenue for separately priced extended warranty contracts is recognized evenly over the life of the contract. Amounts received for warranty contracts that have not yet been earned, are recorded as deferred revenue.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Provisions for estimated future product returns and allowances are recorded in the period of the sale
based on the historical and anticipated future rate of returns. Revenue is reduced for any discounts given to the buyer.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments



The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, long-term receivables,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities and accrued compensation, are reasonable estimates of their fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The fair value of each below-market, long-term
receivable was estimated by discounting the future cash flows based on the interest rate implicit in the financing agreement. Long-term receivable financing arrangements entered into after fiscal 2000 include a market rate of interest and the
carrying value approximates fair value. Long-term debt, which is based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms and maturities, is reported at its carrying value, which the Company believes approximates the
fair value.



Cash Equivalents



Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less at the time of purchase. These investments generally consist of money market funds and commercial paper and are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value.



Accounts Receivable



The Company provides allowances against trade receivables for estimated
losses resulting from our customers inability to pay. The adequacy of this allowance is determined by regularly reviewing the accounts receivable aging and historical write-off rates. If customer payment timeframes were to deteriorate,
additional allowances for doubtful accounts would be required. Also included in the allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate of potential future product returns related to product sales. We analyze the rate of historical returns when
evaluating the adequacy for product returns which is recorded as a reduction of current period revenue.



Inventory



Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company evaluates inventory on hand against historical and planned
usage to determine appropriate provisions for obsolete, slow-moving and demonstration inventory. Inventory includes material, labor and overhead costs.



Property, Plant and Equipment



Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Property, plant and equipment acquired under capital leases are recorded at the present value of
future minimum lease payments. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvement. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets. When assets are sold, or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is recorded.



Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets



In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, which became effective January 2002, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization but are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if an event or circumstances indicates that
impairment has



47



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



occurred. A significant decline in our projected revenues or earnings growth or cash flows, and unanticipated competition or loss of key personnel are among
the many factors that could result in an impairment charge that could have a material negative impact on our operating results. As of November 30, 2004, there were no known events or circumstances that have occurred which would indicate that
impairment has occurred.



Long-Lived Assets



In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets with finite lives continue to be subject to amortization, and are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. A
significant decrease in the fair value of a long-lived asset, an adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset is being used or in its physical condition or an expectation that a long-lived asset will be sold or disposed of
significantly before the end of its previously estimated life are among several of the factors that could result in an impairment charge.



The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used in operations is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired,
the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less selling costs. As
of November 30, 2004, there were no known events or circumstances that have occurred which would indicate that impairment has occurred.



Warranty Cost



The Company records a provision for warranty repairs on all stand-alone BioZ systems sold, which is included in cost of sales in the consolidated
statements of operations and is recorded in the same period the related revenue is recognized. The warranty provision is calculated using historical data to determine the percentage of systems that may require repairs during the warranty period and
the average cost to repair a system. This financial model is then used to calculate the future probable expenses related to warranty and the required warranty provision. The historical data used in this model are reviewed and updated as
circumstances change over the products life cycle. If actual warranty expenditures differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the warranty provision would be required. Actual warranty expenditures are recorded against the warranty
provision as they are incurred.



Research and Development



Research and development costs are expensed in the period
incurred.



Advertising



Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. Advertising costs,
including trade show expenses, amounted to $1,198,000 in 2004, $1,019,000 in 2003 and $954,000 in 2002.



Comprehensive Income (Loss)



Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in the Companys equity (net assets) during each period from transactions and other events and
circumstances from non-owner sources. It includes net income, unrealized



48



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



gains and losses on short-term investments and foreign currency translation adjustments. Marketable securities generally consist of investments in debt
instruments of financial institutions and corporations with strong credit ratings, and in U.S. government obligations.



Income Taxes



Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date. To the extent that available evidence about future taxable earnings indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit associated with the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation
allowance is established.



Foreign Currency Translation



Foreign currency translation adjustments are a result of
translating assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiary from its functional currency into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, using the period-end exchange rate. The average exchange rate of each reporting period is used to translate revenue
and expenses. The cumulative translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) reported as a separate component of shareholders equity.



We have a payable relating to the Medis acquisition that is denominated in a foreign currency. This payable is reported as
deferred acquisition payments in the consolidated balance sheet. The carrying amount of this payable is recorded at net present value and is subject to changes in currency exchange rates and the unrealized gains or losses are included in the
determination of net income in the consolidated statements of operations as foreign currency loss.



Net Income Per Common Share



Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted income per share is calculated by including the additional shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants, that are not anti-dilutive, in the weighted-average share calculation. The following table lists
the potentially dilutive equity instruments, each convertible into one share of common stock.





|                                                    |  |                                  |  |        |  |       
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------
|                                                    |  | (In thousands)                  
|                                                    |  | For the years ended November 30,
|                                                    |  | 2004                             |  | 2003   |  | 2002  
|Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic    |  | 47,668                           |  | 46,248 |  | 46,087
|Effect of dilutive securities:                      |  |                                  |  |        |  |       
|Stock options                                       |  | 1,169                            |  | 1,332  |  | 1,317 
|Warrants                                            |  | 327                              |  | 27     |  | 54    
|                                                    |  |                                  |  |        |  |       
|Dilutive potential shares                           |  | 1,496                            |  | 1,359  |  | 1,371 
|                                                    |  |                                  |  |        |  |       
|Weighted average common shares outstandingdilutive |  | 49,164                           |  | 47,607 |  | 47,458
|                                                    |  |                                  |  |        |  |       



These potentially
dilutive instruments were not included in the per share calculation for 2004, 2003 or 2002 as their effect was antidilutive.





49



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



|              |  |                                  |  |       |  |      
|------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | -----
|              |  | (In thousands)                  
|              |  | For the years ended November 30,
|              |  | 2004                             |  | 2003  |  | 2002 
|Stock options |  | 1,317                            |  | 1,378 |  | 1,327
|Warrants      |  |                                 |  | 2,000 |  | 2,000
|              |  |                                  |  |       |  |      
|Total         |  | 1,317                            |  | 3,378 |  | 3,327
|              |  |                                  |  |       |  |      



Stock-Based
Compensation



In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No.
148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation by providing alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent stock option disclosures in both annual
and interim financial statements.



The Company has implemented
the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148. The Company accounts for stock options granted to employees in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, as
amended.As such, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price.



At November 30, 2004, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans and applied APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for the plans. Under APB
Opinion No. 25, stock-based employee compensation costs are not reflected in net income when the options are granted under the plans and have an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
the grant. No compensation cost has been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the stock options issued to employees since they were all issued at fair market value on the date of grant. Awards under the plan vest over periods of
up to four years.



The weighted-average fair value of options
granted during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, was $2.97, $1.98 and $2.52, respectively, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:



|                        |  |           |   |  |           |   |  |           |  
|----------------------- |  | --------- | - |  | --------- | - |  | --------- | -
|                        |  | 2004      |   |  | 2003      |   |  | 2002      |  
|Expected volatility     |  | 68.1      | % |  | 88.1      | % |  | 92.6      | %
|Expected dividend yield |  | 0         | % |  | 0         | % |  | 0         | %
|Risk-free interest rate |  | 2.3       | % |  | 2.1       | % |  | 3.1       | %
|Expected life           |  | 3.7 years |   |  | 3.1 years |   |  | 2.5 years |  



50



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common
share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.





|                                                                                                                            |  |                                       |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                                                            |  | (In thousands, except per share data) |       
|                                                                                                                            |  |                                       |       
|                                                                                                                            |  | 2004                                  |        |   | 2003 |   |        | 2002 | 
|Net income as reported                                                                                                      |  | $                                     | 10,123 |   |      | $ | 2,452  |      |  | $ | 310    |  
|Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income                                                       |  |                                       |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax |  |                                       | (1,847 | ) |      |   | (2,205 | )    |  |   | (2,442 | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                                       |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Pro forma net income (loss)                                                                                                 |  | $                                     | 8,276  |   |      | $ | 247    |      |  | $ | (2,132 | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                                       |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Earnings (loss) per common share:                                                                                           |  |                                       |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|As reportedbasic                                                                                                           |  | $                                     | .21    |   |      | $ | .05    |      |  | $ | .01    |  
|As reporteddiluted                                                                                                         |  | $                                     | .21    |   |      | $ | .05    |      |  | $ | .01    |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |                                       |       
|Pro formabasic                                                                                                             |  | $                                     | .17    |   |      | $ | .01    |      |  | $ | (.05   | )
|Pro formadiluted                                                                                                           |  | $                                     | .17    |   |      | $ | .01    |      |  | $ | (.05   | )



Reclassifications



Financial presentations for certain prior years account
balances have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation.



(2) Business Combinations



Vermed
Acquisition



On March 22, 2004, the Company acquired
substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of Vermed. Vermed is a manufacturer of electrodes and related supplies used in electrocardiograms and other diagnostic procedures for cardiology, electrotherapy, sleep testing, neurology and
general purpose diagnostic testing. Vermed is located in Bellow Falls, Vermont. The purchase price consisted of $12 million in cash, $512,000 of estimated acquisition costs, and the issuance to Vermont Medical, Inc. of 745,733 shares of the
Companys common stock valued at $4.5 million.



The Vermed
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting whereby the total purchase price was allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase
price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets has been recorded as goodwill. The Company obtained an independent valuation from a nationally recognized valuation firm to assist in the valuation of the acquired assets.
The recognition of goodwill is based on a number of contributing factors that include a long history of financial profitability, a strong reputation for providing top-quality electrodes and Vermeds market position as a leading independent
supplier of disposable electrodes and related supplies used in electrocardiogram and other diagnostic procedures. The primary reasons for the acquisition were to enhance the intellectual property of CardioDynamics ICG sensor technology, reduce
the cost of its ICG sensors, increase the recurring sensor revenue mix of its business, and improve predictability of operating results.



The acquisition was funded, in part, by a $7 million 48-month term loan with Comerica Bank. The term loan has a maturity date of March 22, 2008 and
requires monthly principal and interest payments at a rate of one half



51



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



percent above the banks monthly prime rate and is subject to adjustment on a monthly basis. In addition, the Company modified its secured revolving
credit line with Comerica Bank to increase the amount available under the line from $4 million to $5 million. The revolving credit line has a maturity date of September 14, 2005 and there are no outstanding borrowings under the Companys
revolving credit line as of November 30, 2004. The revolving credit line bears interest at a rate of one half percent above the banks monthly prime rate and is subject to adjustment on a monthly basis. The obligations of the Company under the
revolving credit line and the term loan are secured by a pledge on all of the Companys assets.



The results of Vermeds operations have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The final
cost of the acquisition is as follows (In thousands):



|                                               |  |   |       
|---------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Cash paid for net assets and acquisition costs |  | $ | 12,512
|Issuance of common stock                       |  |   | 4,500 
|                                               |  |   |       
|Total purchase price                           |  | $ | 17,012
|                                               |  |   |       



The allocation of the
purchase price is as follows:



|                               |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------ |  | - | ------ | -
|Accounts receivable, net       |  | $ | 468    |  
|Inventory                      |  |   | 1,065  |  
|Property, plant and equipment  |  |   | 2,551  |  
|Goodwill                       |  |   | 9,500  |  
|Identifiable intangible assets |  |   | 4,000  |  
|Accounts payable               |  |   | (572   | )
|                               |  |   |        |  
|Total purchase price           |  | $ | 17,012 |  
|                               |  |   |        |  



Identifiable
intangible assets acquired consist of the following (In thousands):



|                         |  |   |       |                       |           
|------------------------ |  | - | ----- | --------------------- | ----------
|                         |  |   |       | Estimated Life(years)
|Customer lists           |  | $ | 2,900 |                       | 10        
|OEM relationships        |  |   | 900   |                       | 10        
|Proprietary gel formulas |  |   | 100   |                       | 15        
|Trademark and trade name |  |   | 100   |                       | Indefinite
|                         |  |   |       |                       |           
|                         |  | $ | 4,000 |                       |           
|                         |  |   |       |                       |           



The following pro
forma consolidated information is presented as if the March 2004 acquisition of Vermed occurred on December 1, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These unaudited pro forma consolidated results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not
purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually resulted had the acquisition been in effect in the periods indicated above, or of the future results of operations. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results for years
ended November 30 are as follows (In thousands):



|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       
|------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                    |  | 2004 |        | 2003
|Net sales           |  | $    | 43,559 |      | $ | 38,979
|Net income          |  |      | 10,307 |      |   | 2,690 
|Earnings per share: |  |      |        |      |   |       
|Basic               |  | $    | 0.22   |      | $ | .06   
|Diluted             |  | $    | 0.21   |      | $ | .06   



52



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Medis Acquisition



On June 2, 2004, the Company acquired 80% of all outstanding shares of Medis, a privately held European cardiology and
vascular device company. Medis is located in Ilmenau, Germany and develops, manufactures and sells ICG and venous blood flow products. Medis operates as a majority-owned subsidiary of CardioDynamics and Dr. Olaf Solbrig, co-founder of Medis,
continues as Managing Director. Dr. Solbrig and his partner retain a 20% minority interest in Medis. The purchase price consisted of Euros 800,000 ($985,000) in cash at the date of acquisition, Euros 760,000 (at present value of $806,000 using a 5%
discount rate) to be paid over five years in equal installments, the issuance of 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock valued at $636,000 and $380,000 of estimated acquisition costs. The Company funded the cash portion of the transaction
with available cash. The financial results of Medis are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The acquisition was not considered material to the overall consolidated financial statements, or pro forma
financial statements.



The Medis acquisition was accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting whereby the total purchase price was allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
net tangible and identifiable intangible assets has been recorded as goodwill. The Company has engaged an independent nationally recognized firm to assist in the valuation of amortizable intangible assets acquired and is in the process of finalizing
the valuation of these intangible assets and expects to complete the final purchase price allocation in the second quarter 2005.



The total estimated cost of the acquisition is as follows (In thousands):



|                                                         |  |   |      
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Cash paid for net assets and estimated acquisition costs |  | $ | 1,365
|Issuance of common stock                                 |  |   | 636  
|Deferred acquisition payment to be paid over five years  |  |   | 806  
|                                                         |  |   |      
|Total purchase price                                     |  | $ | 2,807
|                                                         |  |   |      



The preliminary
allocation of the purchase price is as follows:



|                                                             |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ----- | -
|Total current assets                                         |  | $ | 348   |  
|Property, plant and equipment                                |  |   | 966   |  
|Goodwill                                                     |  |   | 1,555 |  
|Identifiable intangible assets (useful life of 4 to 7 years) |  |   | 721   |  
|Total current liabilities                                    |  |   | (248  | )
|Total long-term liabilities                                  |  |   | (386  | )
|Minority interest                                            |  |   | (149  | )
|                                                             |  |   |       |  
|Total purchase price                                         |  | $ | 2,807 |  
|                                                             |  |   |       |  



(3) Segment and Geographic
Information



The Company follows the provisions of SFAS
No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS No. 131 established standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information about
operating segments in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. It also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, legal entity and major customers. An operating segment is defined as a
component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses whose separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the Companys chief operating decision maker, or
decision making group, to perform resource allocations and performance assessments.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Description of Product and Services



Based on evaluation of the Companys financial information reviewed by
the chief operating decision maker, we have determined that we operate our businesses principally through two operating segments: Impedance Cardiography (ICG) and Electrocardiography (ECG).



The ICG segment consists primarily of the development, manufacture and sales
of the BioZ ICG Monitor, BioZ ICG Module and associated BioZtect sensors. These devices use ICG technology to noninvasively measure the hearts mechanical characteristics by monitoring the hearts ability to deliver blood to the body and
are used principally by physicians to assess, diagnose, and treat cardiovascular disease and are sold through our direct sales force and distributors to physicians and hospitals throughout the world. With the recent acquisition of Medis on June 2,
2004, the ICG segment now also includes the Medis diagnostic and monitoring devices such as the Niccomo and Cardioscreen monitors and the Rheoscreen family of measurement devices.



The ECG segment designs, manufactures and sells electrocardiogram electrodes and related supplies through our Vermed
subsidiary acquired on March 22, 2004. These products are used principally in electrocardiogram and other diagnostic procedures for cardiology, electrotherapy, sleep testing, neurology and general purpose diagnostic testing. The products are sold to
a diverse client base of medical suppliers, facilities and physicians.



Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets



The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Companys chief operating decision maker consists of the Companys
CEO and senior management team, who allocate resources and evaluate performance of segments based on several measurements including: net sales, gross margin, income before provision for income taxes and minority interest and total assets.
Accordingly, we have not disclosed other items such as depreciation, amortization and capital expenditures by segment, since this information is not used by our chief operating decision maker to assess the operating performance of individual
segments.



Factors Used to Identify Reportable
Segments



Operating segments were determined to be
reportable segments based on similar economic characteristics of business activities and the common nature of products and customers.



54



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Segment Profit and Assets



Segment information for the Companys reporting segments for years ended November 30 is as follows. The Corporate
unallocated items are comprised of general corporate expenses of a non-segment related nature (In thousands):



|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                        |  | For the years ended November 30, |       
|                                                                        |  | 2004                             |        |   | 2003 |   |        | 2002 | 
|Net external sales:                                                     |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|ICG                                                                     |  | $                                | 34,260 |   |      | $ | 30,332 |      |  | $ | 23,523 |  
|ECG                                                                     |  |                                  | 6,728  |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Consolidated net external sales                                         |  |                                  | 40,988 |   |      |   | 30,332 |      |  |   | 23,523 |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Gross margin:                                                           |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|ICG                                                                     |  |                                  | 26,665 |   |      |   | 23,210 |      |  |   | 17,378 |  
|ECG                                                                     |  |                                  | 2,686  |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Consolidated gross margin                                               |  |                                  | 29,351 |   |      |   | 23,210 |      |  |   | 17,378 |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Gross margin as a percentage of sales:                                  |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|ICG                                                                     |  |                                  | 77.8   | % |      |   | 76.5   | %    |  |   | 73.9   | %
|ECG                                                                     |  |                                  | 39.9   | % |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Consolidated gross margin as a percentage of sales                      |  |                                  | 71.6   | % |      |   | 76.5   | %    |  |   | 73.9   | %
|                                                                        |  |                                  |       
|Income before income taxes and minority interest:                       |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|ICG                                                                     |  |                                  | 3,404  |   |      |   | 3,374  |      |  |   | 637    |  
|ECG                                                                     |  |                                  | 1,271  |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Income before income taxes and minority interest of reportable segments |  |                                  | 4,675  |   |      |   | 3,374  |      |  |   | 637    |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |       
|Corporate unallocated                                                   |  |                                  | (1,724 | ) |      |   | (695   | )    |  |   | (326   | )
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Consolidated income before income taxes and minority interest           |  | $                                | 2,951  |   |      | $ | 2,679  |      |  | $ | 311    |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |       
|                                                                        |  | 2004                             |        |   | 2003 |   |        |      | 
|Total assets:                                                           |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|ICG                                                                     |  | $                                | 28,470 |   |      | $ | 26,648 |      |  |   |        |  
|ECG                                                                     |  |                                  | 19,266 |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Total assets of reportable segments                                     |  |                                  | 47,736 |   |      |   | 26,648 |      |  |   |        |  
|Corporate unallocated                                                   |  |                                  | 10,294 |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Consolidated total assets                                               |  | $                                | 58,030 |   |      | $ | 26,648 |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                        |  |                                  |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  



Goodwill included
above for the ICG segment and ECG segment is $1,686,000 and $9,500,000, respectively.



Significant Customers



For the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company had no individual customer or distributor that accounted for 10% or more of total annual net sales.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Geographic Information



Net sales for domestic and international for the years ended November 30 were as follows (In thousands):



|                             |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                             |  | 2004 |        | 2003 |   | 2002  
|United States                |  | $    | 37,868 |      | $ | 28,773 |  | $ | 22,342
|International(1)             |  |      | 3,120  |      |   | 1,559  |  |   | 1,181 
|                             |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Total consolidated net sales |  | $    | 40,988 |      | $ | 30,332 |  | $ | 23,523
|                             |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |       



Net
long-lived assets by geographic area at November 30 were as follows (In thousands):



|                         |  |      |        |      |   |      |  |   |    
|------------------------ |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | ---
|                         |  | 2004 |        | 2003 |   | 2002
|United States            |  | $    | 17,432 |      | $ | 634  |  | $ | 414
|Europe                   |  |      | 3,427  |      |   |     |  |   |   
|                         |  |      |        |      |   |      |  |   |    
|Net long-lived assets(2) |  | $    | 20,859 |      | $ | 634  |  | $ | 414
|                         |  |      |        |      |   |      |  |   |    

---

|(1) | Sales to customers attributed to geographical areas other than the United States are not material for purposes of separate disclosure.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Net long-lived assets includes property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(4) Short-term Investments, available for sale



A summary of the Companys investment securities, all of which are classified as available for sale is as follows.
Realized gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net. The cost of investments is based on the specific identification method. The determination of estimated fair value is based upon quoted market prices. As of November 30, 2004, we
had no short-term investments, available for sale.



(In
thousands):



|                             |  |      |       |                      |   |                       |  |   |           |   |  |   |      
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | -------------------- | - | --------------------- |  | - | --------- | - |  | - | -----
|November 30, 2003            |  | Cost |       | GrossUnrealizedGains |   | GrossUnrealizedLosses |  |   | FairValue
|U.S. government obligations  |  | $    | 2,002 |                      | $ |                      |  | $ | (17       | ) |  | $ | 1,985
|Certificates of deposits     |  |      | 2,598 |                      |   |                      |  |   |          |   |  |   | 2,598
|                             |  |      |       |                      |   |                       |  |   |           |   |  |   |      
|Total short-term investments |  | $    | 4,600 |                      | $ |                      |  | $ | (17       | ) |  | $ | 4,583
|                             |  |      |       |                      |   |                       |  |   |           |   |  |   |      



(5) Inventory



Inventory consists of the following at November 30 (In thousands):



|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | -
|                                           |  | 2004 |       |   | 2003 |  
|Electronic components and subassemblies    |  | $    | 2,182 |   |      | $ | 1,504 |  
|Finished goods                             |  |      | 1,705 |   |      |   | 1,032 |  
|Demonstration units                        |  |      | 1,369 |   |      |   | 1,390 |  
|Less provision for obsolete inventory      |  |      | (350  | ) |      |   | (417  | )
|Less provision for demonstration inventory |  |      | (259  | ) |      |   | (346  | )
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Inventory, net                             |  | $    | 4,647 |   |      | $ | 3,163 |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  



56



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



(6) Property, Plant and Equipment



Property, plant and equipment at November 30 consists of the following (In thousands):



|                                          |  |                                 |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                          |  | EstimatedUseful Life (In years) |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |  
|Land                                      |  |                                |  | $    | 192    |   |      | $ |       |  
|Buildings and improvements                |  | 5-35                            |  |      | 2,514  |   |      |   | 117    |  
|Computer software and equipment           |  | 3-5                             |  |      | 1,546  |   |      |   | 1,179  |  
|Manufacturing, lab equipment and fixtures |  | 3-20                            |  |      | 2,162  |   |      |   | 299    |  
|Office furniture and equipment            |  | 3-8                             |  |      | 351    |   |      |   | 230    |  
|Sales equipment and exhibit booth         |  | 3-5                             |  |      | 73     |   |      |   | 48     |  
|Auto                                      |  | 5                               |  |      | 21     |   |      |   |       |  
|                                          |  |                                 |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|                                          |  |                                 |  |      | 6,859  |   |      |   | 1,873  |  
|Accumulated depreciation and amortization |  |                                 |  |      | (1,736 | ) |      |   | (1,239 | )
|                                          |  |                                 |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Property, plant and equipment, net        |  |                                 |  | $    | 5,123  |   |      | $ | 634    |  
|                                          |  |                                 |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  



(7) Long-Term Receivables and Note
Receivable



In fiscal 2000, the Company offered its
customers no-interest financing with maturities ranging from 24 to 60 months. Revenue is recorded on these contracts at the time of sale based on the present value of the minimum payments using market interest rates or the rate implicit in the
financing arrangement. Interest income is deferred and recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract. In fiscal 2001, the Company established a similar program through a third party financing company to replace the internal
equipment-financing program. Under certain circumstances, the Company continues to provide in-house financing to its customers, although the contracts now include market rate interest provisions. The long-term receivables resulting from internal
financing are collateralized by the individual systems.



Long-term receivables and note receivable consists of the following at November 30 (In thousands):



|                                                  |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------ | -
|                                                  |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |  
|Long-term receivables, net of deferred interest   |  | $    | 2,748  |   |      | $ | 3,089  |  
|Secured note receivable                           |  |      |       |   |      |   | 394    |  
|Less allowance for doubtful long-term receivables |  |      | (359   | ) |      |   | (560   | )
|                                                  |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|                                                  |  |      | 2,389  |   |      |   | 2,923  |  
|Less current portion of long-term receivables     |  |      | (1,141 | ) |      |   | (1,142 | )
|                                                  |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  
|Long-term receivables and note receivable, net    |  | $    | 1,248  |   |      | $ | 1,781  |  
|                                                  |  |      |        |   |      |   |        |  



(8) Goodwill and Intangible Assets



In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which became effective January 2002, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization but are tested for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the asset might be impaired. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives continue to be subject to amortization, and any impairment is determined in accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets.Estimated amortization expense for the years ending November 30, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is $542,000, $542,000, $542,000, $541,000 and $540,000, respectively.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



The Company recorded $11,055,000 of goodwill at acquisition date related to the Vermed and Medis
acquisitions and identifiable intangible assets which consists of the following at November 30 (In thousands):



|                         |  |                         |  |               |       |                         |   |      |     |  |      |       |                         |   |     |  |   |   |  |   |   
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | ----------------------- | - | ---- | --- |  | ---- | ----- | ----------------------- | - | --- |  | - | - |  | - | --
|                         |  |                         |  | 2004          |       | 2003                   
|                         |  | EstimatedLife (inyears) |  | EstimatedCost |       | AccumulatedAmortization |   |      | Net |  | Cost |       | AccumulatedAmortization |   | Net
|Customer lists           |  | 10                      |  | $             | 2,900 |                         | $ | (201 | )   |  | $    | 2,699 |                         | $ |    |  | $ |  |  | $ |  
|OEM Relationships        |  | 10                      |  |               | 900   |                         |   | (62  | )   |  |      | 838   |                         |   |    |  |   |  |  |   |  
|Proprietary gel Formulas |  | 15                      |  |               | 100   |                         |   | (5   | )   |  |      | 95    |                         |   |    |  |   |  |  |   |  
|Trademark and trade name |  | Indefinite              |  |               | 100   |                         |   |     |     |  |      | 100   |                         |   |    |  |   |  |  |   |  
|Developed technology     |  | 4  7                   |  |               | 781   |                         |   | (68  | )   |  |      | 713   |                         |   |    |  |   |  |  |   |  
|Patents                  |  | 5                       |  |               | 108   |                         |   | (3   | )   |  |      | 105   |                         |   | 90  |  |   |  |  |   | 90
|                         |  |                         |  |               |       |                         |   |      |     |  |      |       |                         |   |     |  |   |   |  |   |   
|                         |  |                         |  | $             | 4,889 |                         | $ | (339 | )   |  | $    | 4,550 |                         | $ | 90  |  | $ |  |  | $ | 90
|                         |  |                         |  |               |       |                         |   |      |     |  |      |       |                         |   |     |  |   |   |  |   |   



(9) Guarantees



Product Warranties



The Company warrants that their stand-alone BioZ System shall be free from
defects for a period of 60 months from the date of shipment on each new system sold in the United States and for 12 months on systems sold internationally (including Medis) and on refurbished or demonstration systems. The warranty includes all
options and accessories purchased with the system, except for the external patient cables, the external printer, and inflatable blood pressure cuffs that are covered for a period of 90 days. The Company records a provision for warranty repairs on
all systems sold, which is included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations and is recorded in the same period the related revenue is recognized.



The warranty provision is calculated using historical data to estimate the percentage of systems that will require repairs
during the warranty period and the average cost to repair a system. This financial model is then used to calculate the future probable expenses related to warranty and the required warranty provision. The estimates used in this model are reviewed
and updated as actual warranty expenditures change over the products life cycle. If actual warranty expenditures differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the warranty provision would be required. During 2004, adjustments were made
to reduce our warranty provision by 58% based on improved repair frequency data and estimated warranty repair cost savings based on actual repair cost.



The following table summarizes information related to our warranty provision at November 30 (In thousands):



|                                                                                      |  |      |      |   |      |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | - | ---- | - | ---- | -
|                                                                                      |  | 2004 |      |   | 2003 |  
|Beginning balance                                                                     |  | $    | 634  |   |      | $ | 333  |  
|Provision for warranties issued during the period, net of adjustments and expirations |  |      | (78  | ) |      |   | 693  |  
|Warranty expenditures incurred during the period                                      |  |      | (147 | ) |      |   | (392 | )
|                                                                                      |  |      |      |   |      |   |      |  
|Ending balance                                                                        |  | $    | 409  |   |      | $ | 634  |  
|                                                                                      |  |      |      |   |      |   |      |  



(10) Financing Agreements



In connection with the acquisition of
Vermed on March 22, 2004, we modified our revolving credit line with Comerica Bank to increase the amount available under the line to $5 million. In addition, we borrowed $7 million on a new term loan to provide a portion of the cash consideration
paid to Vermont Medical, Inc. Under the terms of the revolving credit line, we are required to maintain certain tangible net worth, liabilities to tangible



58



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



net worth and debt service coverage ratios, as well as maintain a minimum liquidity balance. As of November 30, 2004, we are in compliance with the covenants
and do not believe that any covenants are reasonably likely to materially limit our ability to borrow on the credit line. During fiscal 2004 and 2003 and at November 30, 2004 and 2003 there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit
line. The revolving credit line was extended in August 2004 to a maturity date of September 14, 2005 and the term loan has a maturity date of March 22, 2008.



The revolving credit line and the term loan each bear interest at a rate of one half percent above the banks monthly prime rate and are subject to
adjustment on a monthly basis. Additionally, there is an unused commitment fee of one half percent of the difference between the available revolving credit line and the average daily revolving credit balance, reduced by one-quarter percent based on
a stated level of cash on deposit with the bank. The obligations of the Company under the revolving credit line and the term loan are secured by a pledge of all of the Companys assets. Additionally, with the acquisition of Medis on June 2,
2004, we issued letters of credit for $1,009,000 (760,000 Euros) to secure the deferred acquisition payments due to the minority shareholders of Medis to be paid annually over five years through 2009. The credit available under our revolving credit
line is reduced by $1.1 million to cover these letters of credit.



With the acquisition of Medis in June 2004, we assumed two bank loans with the Sparkasse Arnstadt-Ilmenau bank which total 315,000 Euros ($386,000). Under the terms of the loan agreement, the loans are secured by a pledge of the building
valued at 760,000 Euros ($1,009,000) as of November 30, 2004. One of the loans bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.5% through July 2006 and then the bank has the option to adjust the rate. The other loan bears a fixed rate of 5.9% through July 2011
and then the bank has the right to adjust the rate. Both loans mature in August 2021.



(11) Long-term Debt



Long-term debt consists
of the following at November 30 (In thousands):



|                                                                                               |  |      |        |   |      |   |    |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | -- | -
|                                                                                               |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |  
|Secured bank loan payable to Comerica Bank at 5.5% (matures March 2008)                        |  | $    | 5,233  |   |      | $ |   |  
|Secured bank loans payable to Sparkasse Arnstadt-Ilmenau at 5.5% and 5.9% (mature August 2021) |  |      | 412    |   |      |   |   |  
|Capital leases                                                                                 |  |      | 85     |   |      |   | 24 |  
|                                                                                               |  |      |        |   |      |   |    |  
|                                                                                               |  |      | 5,730  |   |      |   | 24 |  
|Less current portion                                                                           |  |      | (1,785 | ) |      |   | (7 | )
|                                                                                               |  |      |        |   |      |   |    |  
|                                                                                               |  | $    | 3,945  |   |      | $ | 17 |  
|                                                                                               |  |      |        |   |      |   |    |  



Maturities of the
long-term debt at November 30, 2004 are as follows (In thousands):



|                          |  |                  |       |                                                                |   |     |                     |  |   |      
|------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | - | --- | ------------------- |  | - | -----
|Years Ending November 30, |  | Gross Maturities |       | Imputed Interest On Minimum Lease Payment Under Capital Leases |   |     | Net Long- Term Debt
|2005                      |  | $                | 1,791 |                                                                | $ | (6  | )                   |  | $ | 1,785
|2006                      |  |                  | 1,791 |                                                                |   | (4  | )                   |  |   | 1,787
|2007                      |  |                  | 1,766 |                                                                |   | (2  | )                   |  |   | 1,764
|2008                      |  |                  | 33    |                                                                |   | (1  | )                   |  |   | 32   
|2009                      |  |                  | 34    |                                                                |   | (1  | )                   |  |   | 33   
|Thereafter                |  |                  | 329   |                                                                |   |    |                     |  |   | 329  
|                          |  |                  |       |                                                                |   |     |                     |  |   |      
|Total                     |  | $                | 5,744 |                                                                | $ | (14 | )                   |  | $ | 5,730
|                          |  |                  |       |                                                                |   |     |                     |  |   |      



59



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



Capital Leases



The Company leases certain equipment under capital leases where the lessors retain a security interest in the equipment
until the capital lease obligation is concluded. Capital leases included in property, plant and equipment are as follows at November 30 (In thousands):



|                               |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | --- | - | ---- | - | --- | -
|                               |  | 2004 |     |   | 2003 |  
|Office furniture and equipment |  | $    | 74  |   |      | $ | 29  |  
|Less accumulated amortization  |  |      | (16 | ) |      |   | (11 | )
|                               |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  
|                               |  | $    | 58  |   |      | $ | 18  |  
|                               |  |      |     |   |      |   |     |  



(12) Shareholders Equity



During 2003, the Company assisted the Allen E. Paulson
Living Trust in the placement of 500,000 shares of Companys common stock. The Company received fees in the amount of $10,000 for their assistance that were completely offset by expenses incurred on behalf of the Trust.



On August 25, 1999, the Company issued 2,000,000 common stock warrants to
GEMS-IT. One million of the warrants were granted to GEMS-IT to obtain access to their technology. The remaining 1,000,000 performance based warrants vested during November 2000, as a result of GEMS-IT meeting their minimum sales objectives. This
resulted in a non-cash charge included in sales and marketing expense in fiscal 1999 of $3,382,000 based on the fair market value of the warrants. Each warrant represents the right to purchase one share of the Companys stock at an exercise
price of $4.10, until the expiration date of August 25, 2004. Just prior to the expiration date, in accordance with their original terms, these warrants were exercised in a cashless net exercise transaction whereby the Company issued 340,753 shares
of common stock equivalent to the in the money value of the warrants at the exercise date.



In August, 2004, 350,000 premium priced warrants that had been granted to as institutional investor in August, 1999, as part of an equity financing, were
exercised at $3.54 per share.



(13) Stock Options



In 2004, the shareholders approved the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2004
Plan), which replaced the 1995 Stock Option/Issuance Plan (the 1995 Plan). Although the 1995 plan remains in effect for outstanding options, no new options may be granted under this plan.



The 2004 Plan authorizes awards of the following types of equity-based compensation: incentive stock options (ISO),
nonqualified stock options (NSO), stock appreciation rights, stock units and restricted stock. The total number of shares reserved and available under the 2004 Plan is 2,000,000 plus any shares remaining available for grant under the 1995 Plan on
the effective date, including shares subject to outstanding options that are subsequently forfeited or terminate for any other reason before being exercised.



The exercise price of an ISO shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant, and the exercise price of an NSO shall
not be less 85% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee, at its sole discretion, shall determine the option exercise price. Under the Option Plan, the exercise price of each option equals the market price
of the Companys stock on the date of grant and an options maximum term is ten years.



The 2004 Plan provides for annual grants to each outside director who was not an employee of the Company within the preceding two years. Each director who
will continue to serve on the Companys Board of Directors



60



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



shall receive a nonstatutory option to purchase 12,000 shares on the first business day following the conclusion of each regular annual meeting. The options
expire the earlier of ten years or twelve months after the directors service is terminated for any reason. In addition to the annual grant, each outside director is given the choice of receiving cash compensation or stock options in exchange
for their services on the board. In July 2003, the Companys Board of Directors granted 10,000 options to a new board member. During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, 102,000, 82,000, and 122,000 options, respectively, were granted to the Board of
Directors at fair market value on the date of grant.



The
Option Plans also provided for grants of options and issuances of stock in exchange for professional services or incentives. During fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, options of 665, 17,510 and 23,802, respectively, were granted in exchange for
services or as an incentive resulting in expense in the amount of $2,000, $17,000 and $75,000 respectively. The compensation expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recorded during the period the services were provided
or, in the case of options granted for services already provided, the period when the option was granted. At November 30, 2004, there were 2,037,670 shares available for grant under the Option Plan. Stock option activity during the periods indicated
is as follows:



|                                         |  |                 |   |  |                                |     
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | - |  | ------------------------------ | ----
|                                         |  | Number ofshares |   |  | Weighted-averageexercise price
|Options outstanding at November 30, 2001 |  | 2,816,416       |   |  | $                              | 3.55
|Granted                                  |  | 894,805         |   |  |                                | 4.50
|Exercised                                |  | (230,628        | ) |  |                                | 2.31
|Forfeited                                |  | (264,649        | ) |  |                                | 4.66
|Expired                                  |  | (55,837         | ) |  |                                | 4.68
|                                         |  |                 |   |  |                                |     
|Options outstanding at November 30, 2002 |  | 3,160,107       |   |  |                                | 3.79
|                                         |  |                
|Granted                                  |  | 1,056,469       |   |  |                                | 3.50
|Exercised                                |  | (229,509        | ) |  |                                | 2.40
|Forfeited                                |  | (157,618        | ) |  |                                | 3.91
|Expired                                  |  | (81,441         | ) |  |                                | 4.12
|                                         |  |                 |   |  |                                |     
|Options outstanding at November 30, 2003 |  | 3,748,008       |   |  |                                | 3.78
|                                         |  |                
|Granted                                  |  | 1,223,315       |   |  |                                | 5.67
|Exercised                                |  | (509,343        | ) |  |                                | 2.83
|Forfeited                                |  | (152,361        | ) |  |                                | 3.94
|Expired                                  |  | (157,286        | ) |  |                                | 4.66
|                                         |  |                 |   |  |                                |     
|Options outstanding at November 30, 2004 |  | 4,152,333       |   |  | $                              | 4.39
|                                         |  |                 |   |  |                                |     



At November 30, 2004
the weighted-average exercise price and weighted-average remaining contractual life of outstanding options under the 2004 Plan was $4.39 and 6.8 years. At November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the number of options exercisable was 2,661,653, 2,385,456
and 2,003,638 respectively, and the weighted-average exercise prices of those options were $4.00, $3.77 and $3.41, respectively.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



The following table sets forth information regarding options outstanding under the Option Plans at
November 30, 2004:



|                         |  |                     |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                   |           |                               |   |      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | ----------------- | --------- | ----------------------------- | - | -----
|                         |  | Options Outstanding |  | Options Exercisable                     
|Range of exercise prices |  | Numberoutstanding   |  | Weighted-averageremainingcontractuallife |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice |       | Numberexercisable |           | Weighted-averageexerciseprice
|$ 0.00  1.18            |  | 25,000              |  | 1.4                                      |  | $                             | 1.00  |                   | 25,000    |                               | $ | 1.00 
|1.19  2.37              |  | 545,996             |  | 3.8                                      |  |                               | 1.90  |                   | 545,996   |                               |   | 1.91 
|2.38  3.56              |  | 1,042,637           |  | 6.6                                      |  |                               | 3.09  |                   | 723,561   |                               |   | 3.10 
|3.57  4.75              |  | 715,546             |  | 7.7                                      |  |                               | 4.19  |                   | 470,152   |                               |   | 4.15 
|4.76  5.94              |  | 671,614             |  | 7.2                                      |  |                               | 5.46  |                   | 400,440   |                               |   | 5.36 
|5.95  7.12              |  | 1,082,022           |  | 7.7                                      |  |                               | 6.19  |                   | 427,049   |                               |   | 6.25 
|7.13  8.31              |  | 63,518              |  | 5.3                                      |  |                               | 7.99  |                   | 63,455    |                               |   | 7.99 
|8.32  9.50              |  | 5,000               |  | 5.3                                      |  |                               | 8.77  |                   | 5,000     |                               |   | 8.77 
|11.88                    |  | 1,000               |  | 5.3                                      |  |                               | 11.88 |                   | 1,000     |                               |   | 11.88
|                         |  |                     |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                   |           |                               |   |      
|                         |  | 4,152,333           |  | 6.8                                      |  | $                             | 4.39  |                   | 2,661,653 |                               | $ | 4.00 
|                         |  |                     |  |                                          |  |                               |       |                   |           |                               |   |      



As part of an
employment agreement with the Companys then chief executive officer, Richard Otto, 250,000 non-transferable stock options were granted in June 1995 (outside the Option Plans) to Mr. Otto at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The options
vest if the quoted market price of the Companys common stock attains specified levels. During fiscal 2000, 100,000 of these options vested and were exercised. At November 30, 2004, of the remaining 150,000 options, none were vested. The
options expire June 15, 2005.



On March 23, 1998, the Company
entered into an employment agreement with Michael K. Perry, who succeeded Mr. Otto as chief executive officer. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Perry was granted 1,295,000 non-transferable stock options (outside the Option Plans) at the grant
date fair market value exercise price of $1.625 per share. The options vest over a four-year period, which commenced on October 16, 1998. During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, Mr. Perry exercised 157,000, 108,000 and 50,000 options, respectively. At
November 30, 2004, 613,000 of the options are outstanding and exercisable. The options expire on October 15, 2008.



(14) Income Taxes



Income tax benefit (provision) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is comprised of the following for the years ended November 30
(In thousands):



|               |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|-------------- |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | -- | -
|               |  | 2004 |       |   | 2003 |   |      | 2002 | 
|Current:       |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|Federal        |  | $    | (106  | ) |      | $ |     |      |  | $ |   |  
|State          |  |      | (60   | ) |      |   | (227 | )    |  |   | (1 | )
|Foreign        |  |      | (47   | ) |      |   |     |      |  |   |   |  
|               |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|Total current  |  |      | (213  | ) |      |   | (227 | )    |  |   | (1 | )
|Deferred:      |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|Federal        |  |      | 6,696 |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |   |  
|State          |  |      | 726   |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |   |  
|Foreign        |  |      |      |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |   |  
|               |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|Total deferred |  |      | 7,422 |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |   |  
|               |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  
|Total benefit  |  | $    | 7,209 |   |      | $ | (227 | )    |  | $ | (1 | )
|               |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |    |  



62



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



The difference between the income tax benefit (provision) and income taxes computed using the U.S.
federal income tax rate was as follows for the years ended November 30 (In thousands):



|                                                            |  |      |        |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                            |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |   |      | 2002 | 
|Computed expected tax provision                           |  | $    | (1,003 | ) |      | $ | (904 | )    |  | $ | (105   | )
|State and local taxes, net of federal benefit               |  |      | 798    |   |      |   | (167 | )    |  |   | (1     | )
|Change in federal valuation allowance                       |  |      | 8,279  |   |      |   | 902  |      |  |   | 1,554  |  
|Adjustment for prior year and expiring net operating losses |  |      | (40    | ) |      |   |     |      |  |   | (1,397 | )
|Deferred compensation                                       |  |      | (752   | ) |      |   |     |      |  |   |       |  
|Other                                                       |  |      | (73    | ) |      |   | (58  | )    |  |   | (52    | )
|                                                            |  |      |        |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes                        |  | $    | 7,209  |   |      | $ | (227 | )    |  | $ | (1     | )
|                                                            |  |      |        |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |        |  



During fiscal 2004,
the Company reduced its valuation allowance by $13,801,000, of this $2,590,000 related to the tax effects of stock compensation plans and was credited to paid-in-capital as it related to deferred tax assets associated with warrants issued in 1999
and exercised in 2004. The tax benefit associated with the Companys stock option plan was $772,000 in 2004, which was also recorded as a credit to additional paid in capital. At November 30, 2004 the Company had federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $23,300,000, which begin to expire in 2011.



The Tax Reform Act of 1986 contains provisions that limit the federal net operating loss carryforwards that may be used in any given year in the event of specified occurrences, including significant ownership changes.
If these specified events occur, the Company may lose some or all of the tax benefits of these carry forwards. During fiscal 2004, the Company performed a §382 study and determined that the extent of such limitations for prior years had no
effect on the availability of the current net operating losses.



At November 30, 2004, the Company had California net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $9,600,000 that begin to expire in fiscal 2005.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax
assets as of November 30 are as follows (In thousands):



|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|                                              |  | 2004 |        |   | 2003 |  
|Current deferred tax assets:                  |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns   |  | $    | 1,061  |   |      | $ | 1,052   |  
|Inventory                                     |  |      | 273    |   |      |   | 371     |  
|Deferred compensation                         |  |      | 56     |   |      |   | 1,676   |  
|Accrued expenses                              |  |      | 589    |   |      |   | 573     |  
|Deferred revenue                              |  |      | 136    |   |      |   | 177     |  
|Other                                         |  |      | 26     |   |      |   |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net current deferred tax assets               |  |      | 2,141  |   |      |   | 3,849   |  
|Current deferred tax liability:               |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Foreign currency translation gain             |  |      | (95    | ) |      |   |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net current deferred tax liability            |  |      | (95    | ) |      |   |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Subtotal deferred tax assets, current portion |  |      | 2,046  |   |      |   | 3,849   |  
|                                              |  |     
|Long-term deferred tax assets:                |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net operating loss carryforwards              |  |      | 8,691  |   |      |   | 9,891   |  
|Other                                         |  |      | 128    |   |      |   | 61      |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net long-term deferred tax assets             |  |      | 8,819  |   |      |   | 9,952   |  
|                                              |  |     
|Long-term deferred tax liability:             |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Intangible assets                             |  |      | (224   | ) |      |   |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net long-term deferred tax liability          |  |      | (224   | ) |      |   |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Subtotal deferred tax assets, long-term       |  |      | 8,595  |   |      |   | 9,952   |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Total deferred tax assets                     |  |      | 10,641 |   |      |   | 13,801  |  
|Valuation allowance                           |  |      |       |   |      |   | (13,801 | )
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  
|Net deferred tax assets                       |  | $    | 10,641 |   |      | $ |        |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |   |         |  



In assessing the
realizability of deferred income tax assets, management follows the guidance contained within SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires that deferred income tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance, if based
on considering all relevant positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The realization of the gross deferred tax assets is dependent on
several factors, including the generation of sufficient taxable income prior to the expiration of the loss carry forwards. In order to realize the benefit associated with net operating losses (NOL), the Company must earn cumulative taxable income of
at least $23,300,000 prior to the expiration of those NOL. These NOL will begin to expire in 2011 and will fully expire by 2023. The Company has reportable taxable income (loss) before NOL carryforwards of $772,000, $2,748,000 and ($248,000) for the
years ended November 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. Management projects that future taxable income and the reversal of existing temporary differences will be sufficient to realize 100% of its deferred tax assets and therefore has concluded
that it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to utilize all of its deferred tax assets as of November 30, 2004. Accordingly, in 2004 the Company reduced the valuation allowance to zero as of November 30, 2004.



(15) Commitments and Contingencies



Letters of Credit



The Company had outstanding letters of credit at November 30, 2004 of
$1,009,000 (Euros 760,000), which expire on June 3, 2009, to support deferred acquisition payments associated with the Medis acquisition to be paid



64



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



over five years annually from 2005 to 2009. The deferred acquisition payments are reported in the current and long-term liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet as of November 30, 2004.



Operating Leases



In June 2004, the Company amended the operating lease for
the existing 18,000 square-foot facility in San Diego, California to extend the terms of the lease from July 31, 2007 to December 31, 2007. The amended lease terms provide for additional expansion space of approximately 15,000 square-feet effective
November 1, 2004, and includes a tenant improvement allowance of $225,000 for the construction of building improvements.



The lease payments on the original space are $22,000 per month. The lease payments on the expansion space commenced on November 1, 2004 at $6,000 per
month and increases to $13,000 per month on November 1, 2005 with a 3% annual increase on each anniversary thereafter. The total additional lease commitments on the amended lease through December 31, 2007 are approximately $532,000. The lease terms
provide for rent incentives and escalations for which the Company has recorded a deferred rent liability which is recognized evenly over the entire period. The difference between the base rent paid, which also includes triple net costs, and the
straight-line rent expense, as well as rent incentives is $323,000 as of November 30, 2004 and is recorded as deferred rent on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.



Rent expense, including triple net building lease, under operating leases was $373,000, $326,000 and $273,000 for the years
ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Future minimum lease payments for operating leases as of November 30, 2004 are as follows (In thousands):



|                          |  |                  |      
|------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -----
|Years ending November 30, |  | LeaseCommitments
|2005                      |  | $                | 352  
|2006                      |  |                  | 432  
|2007                      |  |                  | 444  
|2008                      |  |                  | 62   
|2009                      |  |                  | 22   
|Thereafter                |  |                  |     
|                          |  |                  |      
|                          |  | $                | 1,312
|                          |  |                  |      



Assets Pledged on
Bank Revolving Credit Line and Term Loan



In March 2004,
the revolving line of credit was modified to increase the amount available to $5 million and the Company borrowed $7 million on a term loan in connection with the Vermed acquisition. The Company has pledged all assets as collateral and security in
connection with the bank term loan and revolving credit line agreement.



Contingent Obligation



As part of the
acquisition of Medis, the Company assumed a contingent obligation to repay a German government for public grant subsidies of $413,000 (310,800 Euros, which represents the Companys 80% share) if it does not meet certain conditions through
December 31, 2007. The minority shareholders are personally liable for the other 20% share of the contingent obligation.



The grant subsidies were used to assist with the construction of the building now occupied and used for Medis business operations. The following
conditions must be maintained:



| |  |  | Number of employees must be retained at a minimum level.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Medis must manufacture at least 50% of it sales volume in medical or comparable devices.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



65



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION



Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements(Continued)



| |  |  | The Medis business is not allowed to be discontinued or transferred to another owner without transferring the aforementioned conditions and contingent liability associated with the
government grant provisions.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(16) Employee Benefit Plan



In 1996, the Company established a qualified savings plan
under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Employees who are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the plan at the first calendar quarterly entry date after 90 days of service. The Company may make discretionary
contributions to the plan. Employer matching contributions were $207,000, $161,000 and $68,000 for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.



(17) Related Party Transactions



The Company receives certain engineering, development and consulting services from Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc. (Rivertek), of which the Chief
Technology Officer of the Company is a 100% beneficial owner. The Company paid $259,000, $269,000 and $288,000 for Riverteks services in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amounts payable to Rivertek at November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002
were $145,000, $77,000 and $44,000, respectively.



(18) Supplementary
Financial Data



The following table presents selected
unaudited financial results for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended November 30, 2004. In the opinion of management, this unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited information and includes all
adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the financial information for the periods presented (In thousands, except for per share data):



|                                       |  |              |       |               |   |              |  |                   |        |  |   |       
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ----- | ------------- | - | ------------ |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | - | ------
|                                       |  | FirstQuarter |       | SecondQuarter |   | ThirdQuarter |  | FourthQuarter (1)
|Year Ended November 30, 2004           |  |              |       |               |   |              |  |                   |        |  |   |       
|Net sales                              |  | $            | 8,015 |               | $ | 10,270       |  | $                 | 11,075 |  | $ | 11,628
|Gross margin                           |  |              | 6,160 |               |   | 7,390        |  |                   | 7,600  |  |   | 8,201 
|Income from operations                 |  |              | 737   |               |   | 1,032        |  |                   | 1,059  |  |   | 96    
|Net income                             |  |              | 761   |               |   | 958          |  |                   | 992    |  |   | 7,412 
|Net income per sharebasic and diluted |  |              | .02   |               |   | .02          |  |                   | .02    |  |   | .15   
|                                       |  |              |       |              
|                                       |  | FirstQuarter |       | SecondQuarter |   | ThirdQuarter |  | FourthQuarter    
|Year Ended November 30, 2003           |  |              |       |               |   |              |  |                   |        |  |   |       
|Net sales                              |  | $            | 6,385 |               | $ | 7,285        |  | $                 | 7,808  |  | $ | 8,854 
|Gross margin                           |  |              | 4,753 |               |   | 5,613        |  |                   | 6,040  |  |   | 6,804 
|Income from operations                 |  |              | 37    |               |   | 480          |  |                   | 795    |  |   | 1,016 
|Net income                             |  |              | 116   |               |   | 518          |  |                   | 833    |  |   | 985   
|Net income per sharebasic and diluted |  |              | .00   |               |   | .01          |  |                   | .02    |  |   | .02   

---

|(1) | Fourth quarter 2004 income from operations is lower due to increased development costs of the BioZ Dx, expenses related to the expansion of our sales and clinical personnel,
additional provision for doubtful accounts and compliance costs associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Net income was impacted by an income tax benefit of $7.4 million due to the elimination of the valuation allowance on our deferred
tax assets.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



66



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



None.



|ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|-------- | -----------------------





(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures



The Companys management has evaluated, under the supervision and with
the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, and due to the material weaknesses in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as described below in Managements Annual
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting), the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period
covered by this annual report.



(b) Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



The
Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over
financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.



A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the companys ability to initiate,
authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the companys annual or interim financial
statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. An internal control material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a
material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.



Management of the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on the
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management identified two control deficiencies it considered to be material
weaknesses under the rules specified by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards Auditing Standard No. 2, and therefore concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of November 30, 2004. In completing
this evaluation, management considered material weaknesses identified relating to internal control over financial reporting



67



---

##### Table of Contents

associated with the Companys accounting for income taxes and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts, as described below.



As of November 30, 2004, management identified a deficiency in internal
control over financial reporting associated with the Companys accounting for income taxes. Specifically, a deficiency was identified related to managements review of income tax accounting documentation, prepared by a contracted third
party that failed to identify a material error in certain income tax calculations related to a tax benefit resulting from the exercise of warrants. As a result, an adjustment was recorded in the fourth quarter, prior to issuance of the
Companys 2004 financial statements, to increase the income tax benefit.



Additionally, as of November 30, 2004, management identified a deficiency in internal control over financial reporting related to the calculation of the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically,
the Companys control over the calculation was not designed with adequate precision in order to appropriately reserve for the uncollectible portion of certain classes of aged accounts receivables. As a result, an adjustment was recorded in the
fourth quarter, prior to issuance of the Companys 2004 financial statements, to increase the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts.



Managements evaluation of internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004 excluded an evaluation of the internal control over
financial reporting of Vermed and Medis that were acquired in March and June of 2004 respectively. Vermeds total assets of $19,156,000 and total revenues of $6,729,000 and Medis total assets of $4,049,000 and total revenues of $730,000
are included in the consolidated financial statements of CardioDynamics International Corporation and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended November 30, 2004. KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on
managements assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.



(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



The Company has made no changes in its internal control over financial reporting in connection with its fourth quarter evaluation that would materially
affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. The Company continues to review, revise and improve the effectiveness of its internal controls including strengthening its income tax provision
review control procedure noted above.



68



---

##### Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors and Stockholders

CardioDynamics International Corporation:



We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
that CardioDynamics International Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, because of the effect of material weaknesses identified in managements assessment, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). CardioDynamics International Corporations management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.



We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



A companys
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in
managements assessment: As of November 30, 2004, management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the Companys accounting for income taxes. Specifically, deficiencies were identified
related to managements review of income tax accounting documentation, prepared by a contracted third party, that failed to identify a material error in certain income tax calculations related to a tax benefit resulting from the exercise of
warrants. Additionally, as of November 30, 2004 management identified a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting related to the calculation of the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically, the
Companys control over the calculation was not designed with adequate precision in order to appropriately reserve for the uncollectible portion of certain classes of aged accounts receivable. This deficiency in internal control over financial
reporting resulted in an understatement of the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the



69



---

##### Table of Contents

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of CardioDynamics International Corporation and subsidiaries as of
November 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2004. These material weaknesses
were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated February 28, 2005, which expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



In our
opinion, managements assessment that CardioDynamics International Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, CardioDynamics
International Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission COSO.



CardioDynamics
International Corporation acquired Vermed Medical Inc. and Medis in separate transactions during 2004, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of CardioDynamics International Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, Vermeds internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $19,156,000 and total revenues of $6,729,000 and Medis internal control over financial reporting associated
with total assets of $4,049,000 and total revenues of $730,000 included in the consolidated financial statements of CardioDynamics International Corporation and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended November 30, 2004. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting of CardioDynamics International Corporation also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Vermed and Medis.



/s/ KPMG LLP

San Diego, California

March 28, 2005



70



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III



|ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS | AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------



Directors and Executive Officers



Our directors and executive officers as of January 15, 2005 are as follows:



|                            |  |     |  |                                           
|--------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name                        |  | Age |  | Position(s)                               
|James C. Gilstrap           |  | 68  |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors        
|Michael K. Perry            |  | 44  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director      
|Rhonda F. Rhyne             |  | 44  |  | President                                 
|Steve P. Loomis             |  | 44  |  | Chief Financial Officer                   
|Russell H. Bergen           |  | 57  |  | Vice President of Operations              
|Patrick W. Bradley, Ph.D.   |  | 51  |  | Vice President of Business Development    
|Dennis G. Hepp              |  | 55  |  | Chief Technology Officer                  
|Richard E. Trayler          |  | 54  |  | Vice President of International Operations
|Connie R. Curran, Ed.D., RN |  | 57  |  | Director                                  
|Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D.     |  | 62  |  | Director                                  
|Ronald A. Matricaria        |  | 62  |  | Director                                  
|Richard O. Martin, Ph.D.    |  | 64  |  | Director                                  
|Ronald L. Merriman.         |  | 60  |  | Director                                  



James C.
Gilstrap, age 68, has served as the chairman or co-chairman of our board of directors since May 1995. Mr. Gilstrap is retired from Jefferies & Company, where he served as senior executive vice president, partner, board member, and a
member of the executive committee. Mr. Gilstrap is past president of the Dallas Securities Dealers, as well as a past member of the board of governors of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.



Michael K. Perry, See description under Executive Officers
in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Rhonda F. Rhyne, See
description under Executive Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Steve P. Loomis, See description under Executive Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Russell H. Bergen,See description under Executive Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Patrick W. Bradley, Ph.D., See description under Executive
Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Dennis G.
Hepp,See description under Executive Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Richard E. Trayler,See description under Executive Officers in Part I of this Form 10-K/A.



Connie R. Curran, RN, Ed.D., age 57, has served on our board of
directors since February 2000. Dr. Curran is the Executive Director of C-Change, a collaboration to conquer cancer, in Washington, D.C. Dr. Curran was president and chief executive officer of CurranCare, LLC from 1995 to 2000. She has held a variety
of executive positions in academia and multi-system healthcare operations and serves as vice president of the American Hospital Association, as national director of patient care for APM, Inc. and as Dean at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Dr.
Curran serves on the boards of IDX, DeVry, The National Student Nurses Association and Silver Cross Hospital. Dr. Curran holds a masters degree in medical-surgical nursing from De Paul University, a doctorate in educational psychology from
Northern Illinois University and is also a graduate of the Harvard Business School program for company owners and presidents.



71



---

##### Table of Contents

Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D., age 62, has served on our board of directors since May
2002. Dr. Farrell has been chairman and a director of ResMed, Inc. since its inception in 1989 and chief executive officer since 1990. From 1984 to 1989, Dr. Farrell served as vice president, research and development at various subsidiaries of
Baxter International, Inc. (Baxter) and including managing director of the Baxter Center for Medical Research Pty Ltd. From 1978 to 1989, he was foundation director of the Center for Biomedical Engineering at the University of New South Wales where
he currently serves as a visiting professor. He holds a bachelors degree in chemical engineering with honors from the University of Sydney, a masters degree in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a Ph.D.
in chemical engineering and bioengineering from the University of Washington, Seattle and a D.Sc. from the University of New South Wales. In 2000, he was named vice chairman of the executive council of the Harvard Medical School division of sleep
medicine.



Ronald A. Matricaria, age 62,
has served on our board of directors since May 2002. From 1993 to 1999, Mr. Matricaria served as president and chief executive officer of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and served as chairman of the board of directors from his election in 1995 until his
retirement in December 2002. Prior to joining St. Jude Medical, Mr. Matricaria spent 23 years with Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. His last position was executive vice president of the Pharmaceutical Division of Eli Lilly and Company and president of
its North American operations. Mr. Matricaria serves on the boards of Cyberonics, Invitrogen and Vistacare, Inc. and is an advisor to a private equity healthcare fund. Mr. Matricaria is also chairman of the board of directors of Haemonetics,
Inc. Mr. Matricaria holds a bachelors degree in pharmacy from Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and was awarded an honorary doctor of science degree in pharmacy in recognition of his contributions to the practice of pharmacy.



Richard O. Martin, Ph.D., age 64, has served as a
director since July 1997. From 1998 until 2001, Dr. Martin served as president of Medtronic Physio-Control Corporation, a medical device company that designs, manufactures and sells external defibrillators and heart monitors. Prior to its
acquisition by Medtronic in 1998, Dr. Martin was chairman and chief executive officer of Physio-Control Corporation. Prior to that, he was vice president of cardiovascular business development with Sulzer Medica and has held management positions at
Intermedics, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. Dr. Martin serves on the boards of directors of EsophyX Inc., Cardiac Dimensions, Inc., Encore Medical Corp. and Inovise Medical Inc. Dr. Martin earned a bachelors degree in electrical engineering from
Christian Brothers College, a masters degree in electrical engineering from Notre Dame University and a doctorate in electrical/biomedical engineering from Duke University.



Ronald L. Merriman, age 60, has been a director and our audit committee chairman since July 2003. He is managing
partner of Merriman Partners, a consulting and investment firm. Mr. Merriman previously served as managing director of the international law firm, OMelveny & Meyers LLP, where he was a member of the management committee. Previously, Mr.
Merriman served as executive vice president for Carlson Wagonlit Travel and as executive vice president for Ambassadors International. Mr. Merriman retired in 1997 after 30 years with the Big Four global accounting firm of KPMG LLP where he was vice
chairman and senior partner in charge of KPMGs healthcare and life science sector. Mr. Merriman also serves on the board of directors of a privately held company and a not-for-profit hospital organization. Mr. Merriman is a certified public
accountant and earned a bachelors degree in accountancy from Northern Illinois University.



Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance



We believe that each person who, at any time during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, was a director, officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10%
of a class of registered equity securities of CardioDynamics, filed on a timely basis all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.



72



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE | COMPENSATION
|--------------------- | ------------



The following table provides information regarding the annual and long-term compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities to CardioDynamics
for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 of those persons who were, at November 30, 2004 (i) the Chief Executive Officer and (ii) the four most highly compensated executive officers of CardioDynamics whose aggregate direct
remuneration from the Company during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004 exceeded $100,000 (collectively, the Named Officers).



SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE



|                                                              |  |              |  |                        |                                       |                             |  |                             |  |                   
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ---------------------- | ------------------------------------- | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                                              |  |              |  | Annual Compensation(1) |                                       | Long TermCompensationAwards
|                                                              |  |              |  |                        | Securities UnderlyingOptions/SARs (#)
|Name and Principal Position                                   |  | Year         |  | Salary($)              |                                       | Bonus($)                    |  | Other AnnualCompensation($) | 
|Michael K. Perry Chief Executive Officer                      |  | 200420032002 |  | 262,237239,400229,775  |                                       | 103,575123,57547,850        |  | -0--0--0-                   |  | 60,00060,60030,000
|Rhonda F. Rhyne President                                     |  | 200420032002 |  | 218,214211,348209,663  |                                       | 62,42585,50031,975          |  | -0--0--0-                   |  | 50,00050,00025,000
|Steve P. Loomis Chief Financial Officer                       |  | 200420032002 |  | 171,130163,393161,519  |                                       | 53,92567,75026,100          |  | -0--0--0-                   |  | 40,00040,00020,000
|Russell H. Bergen Vice President of Operations                |  | 200420032002 |  | 160,465155,386140,000  |                                       | 52,20065,20025,700          |  | -0--0--0-                   |  | 40,00040,60020,000
|Richard E. Trayler Vice President of International Operations |  | 200420032002 |  | 166,680161,000159,547  |                                       | 52,95059,52521,050          |  | -0--0--0-                   |  | 20,00020,00010,600

---

|(1) | Employee benefits provided to each of the Named Officers under various Company programs do not exceed the disclosure thresholds established under the SEC rules and are therefore not
included.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



73



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table provides information regarding option grants during the fiscal year ended November
30, 2004 to the Named Officers in fiscal 2004. These options were granted in January of 2004 based on executive achievements in fiscal 2003. We have not granted any stock appreciation rights.



OPTION/SAR GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR



|                   |  |                                                     |  |                                                              |        |  |                                    |      |                |            |                                                                                              |   |         |  |   |        
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ------ |  | ---------------------------------- | ---- | -------------- | ---------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                   |  | Individual Grants                                   |  |                                                             
|Name               |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingOptionsGranted (#) (1) |  | Percent ofTotal OptionsGranted toEmployees InFiscal Year2004 |        |  | ExercisePrice PerShare ($/Sh.) (2) |      | ExpirationDate |            | Potential RealizableValue at AssumedAnnual Rates of StockAppreciation for theOption Term (3)
|                   |  |                                                     |  |                                                              | 5% ($) |  | 10% ($)                           
|Michael K. Perry   |  | 60,000                                              |  | 5                                                            | %      |  | $                                  | 6.07 |                | 01/15/2014 |                                                                                              | $ | 229,043 |  | $ | 580,441
|Rhonda F. Rhyne    |  | 50,000                                              |  | 4                                                            | %      |  | $                                  | 6.07 |                | 01/15/2014 |                                                                                              |   | 190,870 |  |   | 483,701
|Steve P. Loomis    |  | 40,000                                              |  | 3                                                            | %      |  | $                                  | 6.07 |                | 01/15/2014 |                                                                                              |   | 152,696 |  |   | 386,961
|Russell H. Bergen  |  | 40,000                                              |  | 3                                                            | %      |  | $                                  | 6.07 |                | 01/15/2014 |                                                                                              |   | 152,696 |  |   | 386,961
|Richard E. Trayler |  | 20,000                                              |  | 2                                                            | %      |  | $                                  | 6.07 |                | 01/15/2014 |                                                                                              |   | 76,348  |  |   | 193,480

---

|(1) | Options vest 25% after one year, and the remainder vests in 36 equal monthly installments.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All options were granted at fair market value (closing sale price for our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on the date of grant).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The potential realizable value is calculated based on the ten-year term of the options at the time of grant; the assumption that the closing price for the common stock on the grant
date appreciates at the indicated annual rate compounded annually for the entire term of the option; and the assumption that the option is exercised and sold on the last day of its term.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The following table provides further information regarding the Named
Officers exercises and outstanding stock options as of November 30, 2004. No stock appreciation rights were granted or exercised.



AGGREGATED OPTION/SAR EXERCISES IN LAST

FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION/SAR VALUES



|                   |  |                                |  |                    |  |                                                                                              |  |                                                                                                
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name               |  | Shares AcquiredOn Exercise (#) |  | Value Realized ($) |  | Number of SecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions/SARs at FY-End (#)Exercisable/Unexercisable |  | Value (1) of Unexercised In-the-Money Options/SARs at FY- End ($)Exercisable/ Unexercisable (2)
|Michael K. Perry   |  | 162,000                        |  | 656,675            |  | 781,397 / 102,503                                                                            |  | 1,960,980 / 51,661                                                                             
|Rhonda F. Rhyne    |  | 65,000                         |  | 252,190            |  | 375,482 / 85,418                                                                             |  | 642,787 / 43,051                                                                               
|Steve P. Loomis    |  | 25,000                         |  | 80,770             |  | 92,862 / 68,335                                                                              |  | 66,811 / 34,440                                                                                
|Russell H. Bergen  |  | 3,000                          |  | 8,490              |  | 144,565 / 68,335                                                                             |  | 248,070 / 34,440                                                                               
|Richard E. Trayler |  | 24,000                         |  | 96,100             |  | 97,315 / 34,585                                                                              |  | 96,679 / 17,433                                                                                

---

|(1) | Represents the difference between the closing sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market of $4.57 on November 30, 2004 and the exercise price of the options.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The respective Named Officers as of November 30, 2004 could not exercise these options and future exercisability is subject to certain vesting provisions including specific stock
price thresholds and/or remaining in the employ of the Company for up to four additional years.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Employment Agreements



The Company is not party to any employment agreements.



74



---

##### Table of Contents

Long-Term Incentive Plans



We do not have any long-term incentive plans (as defined in the SEC rules and regulations).



Directors Fees



Each non-employee director who has not been employed by us during the preceding two years receives 12,000 stock options. In
addition, at their election, they also receive either $2,000 per month or an annual grant of 12,000 stock options granted at fair market value. The options vest in increments of 1,000 per month and expire upon the earlier of ten years from the date
of grant or two years after the director terminates their position on the Board. All directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board.



During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, 102,000, 82,000 and 122,000 options,
respectively, were granted to the members of the Board of Directors. During fiscal 2004, the director fees were as follows:



|                            |  |           |        |               |       
|--------------------------- |  | --------- | ------ | ------------- | ------
|                            |  | Cash Paid |        | Stock Options
|James C. Gilstrap           |  | $         |       |               | 24,000
|Connie R. Curran, Ed.D., RN |  |           | 12,000 |               | 18,000
|Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D.     |  |           | 24,000 |               | 12,000
|Ronald A. Matricaria        |  |           | 24,000 |               | 12,000
|Richard O. Martin, Ph.D.    |  |           |       |               | 24,000
|Ronald L. Merriman          |  |           | 24,000 |               | 12,000



Director Independence



All of the members of our Board of Directors qualify as
independent as defined by the rules of The NASDAQ National Market, except for Mr. Perry.



Relationships among Directors and Executive Officers



We are not aware of any family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.



Code of Ethics



We have adopted (and filed as an exhibit to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003) a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to
our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.cdic.com/ir/fr_govern.html.



75



---

##### Table of Contents

BOARD COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE

COMPENSATION



Our compensation programs and policies applicable to our executive officers are established and administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. The Compensation Committee is comprised of three non-employee directors, none of whom have interlocking relationships as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.



It is the philosophy of the Compensation Committee that executive
compensation be aligned with our overall business strategies, values and performance. These policies are designed to set its executive compensation, including salary, cash bonus awards and long-term stock-based incentive awards, at a level
consistent with amounts paid to executive officers of companies of similar size, industry and geographic location.



Compensation Philosophy and Objectives



The Compensation Committee believes that compensation of our executive officers should:



| |  |  | Encourage creation of shareholder value and achievement of strategic corporate objectives;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Integrate compensation with our annual and long-term corporate objectives, values and business strategies, and focus executive actions on the fulfillment of those objectives, values
and strategies;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Provide a competitive total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high caliber personnel;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Provide a compensation opportunity that is competitive with companies in the medical device and biotechnology industries, taking into account relative company size, performance and
geographic location as well as individual responsibilities and performance; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Align the interests of management with the long-term interests of stockholders and enhance shareholder value by providing management with longer-term incentives through equity
ownership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Compensation Committee
periodically reviews the approach to executive compensation and will make changes as competitive conditions and other circumstances warrant and will seek to ensure our compensation philosophy is consistent with our best interests.



Key Elements of Executive Compensation



The compensation of executive officers is based upon our financial
performance as well as the achievement of certain business objectives, including: increased market penetration, broadening of distribution channels through strategic relationships, securing and growing recurring revenue, targeting new market
opportunities, furthering ICG technology and developing ICG products for new medical applications, as well as the achievement of individual business objectives by each executive officer.



Executive compensation consists of three elements: (i) base salary, (ii) bonus awards and (iii) long-term stock-based
incentive awards. The summary below describes in more detail the factors that the Compensation Committee considers in establishing each of the three primary components of the variable compensation package provided to the executive officers.



Base salarySalary ranges are largely determined
through comparisons with companies of similar headcount, revenues, market capitalization or complexity in the medical device and biotechnology industries. Actual salaries are based on individual performance contributions and other more qualitative
and developmental criteria within a competitive salary range for each position that is established through evaluation of responsibilities, competitive, inflationary, internal equity and market considerations. The Compensation Committee, on the basis
of its knowledge of executive compensation in the industry, believes that our salary



76



---

##### Table of Contents

levels for the executive officers are at a level that the Compensation Committee, at the time such salary determinations were made, considered to be
reasonable and necessary given our financial resources and stage of development. The Compensation Committee reviews executive salaries each October and sets the salaries for the following year.



Bonus awardsThe Compensation Committee has established an
incentive bonus program providing for the payment to each executive officer of quarterly bonuses that are directly related to the group and individual achievements of executive management and our revenues and earnings. The bonus pool is established
based on quarterly revenues and earnings achieved and the pool is allocated to individual executives through a weighting, half of which is based on achievement of our revenue and earnings goals and half of which is based on CEO and Compensation
Committee assessment of the executives individual quarterly goal achievement and overall contribution to CardioDynamics.



In fiscal 2004, the target bonuses for executive officers ranged from 41% to 53% of annual base salary and were actually paid at 29% to 38% of annual base
salary. Incentive award amounts for each participant are based on his or her potential impact on our operating and financial results and on market competitive pay practices. Under the incentive bonus program, incentive awards are paid based on
achievement of quarterly performance goals. These performance goals include individual performance goals, which are established by the CEO at the beginning of each quarter, and annual corporate performance goals. The corporate performance goals are
based on our achievement of strategic objectives as well as specific revenue and earnings growth targets for each quarter and the fiscal year.



Long-term stock-based incentive awardsOur Stock Option Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in 2004, as well as the executive
bonus plan, are structured to permit awards under such plans to qualify as performance-based compensation and to maximize the tax deductibility of such awards. The Committee intends that compensation paid to management, including stock options, be
exempt from the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee administers grants under our Stock Option Plan to members of management.



The Compensation Committee believes that providing incentives that focus
attention on managing us from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business will closely align the interest of shareholders and executive officers. Therefore, all employees, and particularly those persons who have substantial
responsibility for our management and growth, are eligible to receive annual stock option grants, although the Compensation Committee, at its discretion, may grant options at other times in recognition of exceptional achievements.



The number of shares underlying stock options granted to executive officers
is based on competitive practices in the industry as determined by independent surveys and the Compensation Committees knowledge of industry practice. The Compensation Committee grants options under the Stock Option Plan with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The grants are intended to be competitive in order to retain and encourage positive future performance and to provide a direct link with the interests of our shareholders.



The Compensation Committee, in making its determination as to grant levels,
takes into consideration: (i) the executives historical and expected contribution toward our objectives, (ii) prior award levels, (iii) award levels necessary to replace particular executives, (iv) the executives direct ownership of our
shares, (v) the number of options vested and unvested and (vi) the number of options outstanding as a percentage of total shares outstanding. During fiscal 2004, a total of 1,223,315 options were granted, representing 2.5% of our outstanding shares.
Of those, 276,666 were granted to our executive officers. The Stock Option Plan limits the total number of shares subject to options that may be granted to a participant during the lifetime of the plan to 800,000 shares. The Stock Option Plan
contains provisions providing for forfeiture of the options in the event the option holder engages in certain intentional misconduct contrary to our interests.



77



---

##### Table of Contents

Chief Executive Officer Compensation



Michael K. Perry is our Chief Executive Officer. In October 2003, the Compensation Committee set Mr. Perrys
annual base salary for 2004 at $263,000. The Compensation Committee increased Mr. Perrys base salary from $234,000 for the prior year in recognition of his achievement of specific corporate objectives in 2003, which included: growing our
revenues 29%, growing net income 691% and achieving the Companys first full year of positive operating cash flow at $2.2 million. Additionally, he was recognized for the achievement of additional strategic collaborations and the further
establishment and development of our products and markets. The Compensation Committee determined that these achievements were important to our future growth and could assist us in enhancing shareholder value. The Compensation Committee also
considered Mr. Perrys compensation relative to medical device and biotechnology industry norms as well as the average increase in annual salaries for all of our employees as a whole.



In recognition of Mr. Perrys accomplishments in fiscal 2004, and as an
incentive for future performance, the Compensation Committee in January 2005, granted Mr. Perry options under our Stock Option Plan, exercisable at the fair market value on the date of grant, to purchase 45,000 shares of our common stock. The
options vest over a four-year period.



Mr. Perry is a member of
the Board of Directors, but did not participate in matters involving the evaluation of his own performance or the setting of his own compensation. The foregoing report has been furnished by our Compensation Committee.



Compensation Committee:



Richard O. Martin, Ph.D.Chairman



James C. Gilstrap



Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D.



78



---

##### Table of Contents

PERFORMANCE GRAPH



The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of an investment of
$100 from November 30, 1999 to November 30, 2004 for: (i) our common stock, (ii) the Russell 2000 stock index and (iii) the Medical Equipment and Appliance Industry Group index. Our common stock is included in both of these indices. The Russell 2000
is comprised of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 index, which contains the 3,000 largest United States companies, based on total market capitalization.



LOGO



|                                    |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |     
|----------------------------------- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ----
|(In dollars)                        |  | 1999 |  | 2000 |  | 2001 |  | 2002 |  | 2003 |  | 2004
|CardioDynamics                      |  | 100  |  | 148  |  | 243  |  | 136  |  | 217  |  | 152 
|Medical Equipment & Appliance Group |  | 100  |  | 125  |  | 117  |  | 117  |  | 145  |  | 170 
|Russell 2000 Stock Index            |  | 100  |  | 98   |  | 101  |  | 89   |  | 120  |  | 140 



79



---

##### Table of Contents

|ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Holders



The following are the only persons known by us to own beneficially, 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock
as of January 15, 2005.



|                                                                  |  |                            |  |               |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------- | -
|                                                                  |  | Shares Beneficially Owned. | 
|Name and Address of Beneficial Owner                              |  | Number (1)                 |  | Percentage(2) |  
|J. Michael Paulson(3) P.O. Box 9660 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067     |  | 4,159,862                  |  | 8.5           | %
|                                                                  |  |                           
|Kopp Investment Advisors, LLC 4 New York Plaza New York, NY 10004 |  | 3,458,325                  |  | 7.1           | %
|                                                                  |  |                           
|Societe Generale Veritas 4 New York Plaza New York, NY 10004      |  | 2,936,076                  |  | 6.0           | %

---

|(1) | Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Percentage of ownership is calculated pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes 3,776,607 shares held in the Allen E. Paulson Living Trust dated December 23, 1986 of which J. Michael Paulson is the Trustee and executor. Also includes 7,000 shares
beneficially owned by the Trust, by virtue of its right to acquire such shares from us under stock options now exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 376,255 shares held by J. Michael Paulson, by virtue of his right to acquire such
shares from us under stock options now exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. Excludes shares of common stock owned by Mr. Paulsons brothers; Mr. Paulson disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



80



---

##### Table of Contents

Security Ownership of Management



The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 15, 2005 by each of our Directors
and each Named Officer, and by all of our Directors and executive officers as a group. Each such person has a business address, care of CardioDynamics.



|                                                               |  |                           |  |            
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------
|                                                               |  | Shares Beneficially Owned
|Name                                                           |  | Number (1)(5)             |  | Percent (2)
|Russell H. Bergen(3)                                           |  | 174,815                   |  | *          
|Connie R. Curran(3)                                            |  | 68,999                    |  | *          
|James C. Gilstrap(4)                                           |  | 2,323,926                 |  | 4.8%       
|Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D.(3)                                     |  | 142,999                   |  | *          
|Steve P. Loomis(3)                                             |  | 123,418                   |  | *          
|Richard O. Martin, Ph.D.(3)                                    |  | 162,999                   |  | *          
|Ronald A. Matricaria(3)                                        |  | 46,299                    |  | *          
|Ronald L. Merriman(3)                                          |  | 23,957                    |  | *          
|Michael K. Perry(3)                                            |  | 835,772                   |  | 1.7%       
|Rhonda F. Rhyne(3)                                             |  | 412,669                   |  | *          
|Richard E. Trayler(3)                                          |  | 193,857                   |  | *          
|All Directors and executiveofficers as a group(13 persons)(3) |  | 4,763,422                 |  | 9.4%       

---

|* | Less than 1%
|- | ------------

|(1) | Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Share ownership in each case includes shares issuable on exercise of certain outstanding options as described in the footnotes below.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Percentage of ownership is calculated pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes shares of common stock that may be acquired pursuant to stock options exercisable currently or exercisable within 60 days.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Includes 18,273 shares of common stock beneficially owned by CDH, of which Mr. Gilstrap is a member with a minority interest. Mr. Gilstrap disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares except to the extent of his individual pecuniary interest in CDH. Includes 400,000 shares held by the Scripps Medical Charitable Limited Partnership of which Mr. Gilstrap is a general partner with a minority ownership interest.
Mr. Gilstrap disclaims any pecuniary interest in 399,752 of the shares. Also includes 51,999 shares of common stock Mr. Gilstrap beneficially owns, by virtue of his right to acquire such shares from us under stock options now exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days. Also includes 32,654 shares held by the James C. Gilstrap Trust dated January 16, 1995 and 71,000 shares held in his daughters trusts, Mr. Gilstrap disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Shares beneficially owned include shares held by entities affiliated with certain Directors and Named Officers as described above in the footnotes.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



81



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information



The following table sets forth certain information concerning common stock to be issued in connection with our equity
compensation plans.



|                                                           |  |                                                                                             |  |                                                                              |      |                                                                                                                                    |          
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------
|Plan Category                                              |  | Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise of outstandingoptions,
warrants andrights (a) |  | Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and
rights (b) |      | Number of securitiesremaining availablefor issuance underequity
compensationplans (excludingsecurities reflected incolumn (a)) (c)
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     |  | 4,152,333                                                                                   |  | $                                                                            | 4.39 |                                                                                                                                    | 2,037,670
|Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  | 763,000                                                                                     |  | $                                                                            | 1.40 |                                                                                                                                    | None     
|Total                                                      |  | 4,915,333                                                                                   |  | $                                                                            | 3.92 |                                                                                                                                    | 2,037,670



For a discussion of
our equity compensation plans, See Note 13 Stock Options in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.



|ITEM 13.    CERTAIN | RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|------------------- | --------------------------------------



The Company receives certain engineering, development and consulting services from Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc., of which Dennis Hepp, Chief Technology
Officer of the Company is a 100% beneficial owner. The Company paid $259,000, $269,000 and $288,000 to Rivertek for engineering services in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Amounts payable to Rivertek at November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002
were $145,000, $77,000 and $44,000, respectively.



|ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL | ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|--------------------- | ----------------------------



The following table presents fees billed as of the Form 10-K/A filing date for professional audit services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of the
Companys annual financial statements for the years ended November 30 and fees for other services rendered by KPMG LLP during those periods.



|               |  |      |         |      |   |       
|-------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------
|               |  | 2004 |         | 2003
|Audit Fees     |  | $    | 715,893 |      | $ | 61,500
|Tax Fees       |  |      | 7,500   |      |   | 4,000 
|All Other Fees |  |      | 77,440  |      |   |      
|               |  |      |         |      |   |       
|Total          |  | $    | 800,833 |      | $ | 65,500
|               |  |      |         |      |   |       



Audit
fees.Audit fees relate to services rendered in connection with the annual audit of the Companys financial statements and internal controls, SAS 100 quarterly review of our financial statements and fees for SEC
registration statement services.



Tax
Fees.Tax services consisted of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services.



All Other Fees.Other fees consisted primarily of acquisition related services.



The Audit committee considers whether the provision of theses services is
compatible with maintaining KPMG LLPs independence, and has determined such services for fiscal 2004 and 2003 were compatible. All of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii)(C) of Rule
2-01 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act, to the extent that the rule was applicable during 2003 and 2004.



82



---

##### Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT



The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the
Companys financial reporting process, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the independent audit of its financial statements. The Audit Committee consisted of three non-employee members. Each member of the Audit
Committee is independent within the meaning of SEC rules and regulations and the listing standards of the National Association of Securities Dealers, and the Board has determined that Mr. Merriman qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert within the meaning of SEC rules and regulations.



The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Companys audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting
principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors the auditors independence from management and the
Audit Committee including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditors independence.



The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with KPMG LLP, the
Companys independent accountants who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, their judgment
as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Companys accounting practices and such other matters as are required to be discussed by the independent accountants with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards
including the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures from KPMG LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 and the Audit Committee has
discussed the independence of KPMG LLP with that firm. Based on the Audit Committees review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Companys audited financial statements be included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Respectfully Submitted:

The Audit Committee



|                             |  |                         |  |                         
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                             |  |                        
|/s/    RONALD L.
MERRIMAN    |  | /s/    CONNIE R.
CURRAN |  | /s/    RICHARD O.
MARTIN
|Ronald L. Merriman, Chairman |  | Connie R. Curran        |  | Richard O. Martin       



83



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV



|ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, | FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------



(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:



|                                                                                                                              |  |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------
|                                                                                                                              |  | Page   
|1.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                                                    |  | 40     
|                                                                                                                              | 
|2. Financial Statements                                                                                                       |  |        
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2004 and 2003                                                                  |  | 41     
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002                                    |  | 42     
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |  | 43     
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002                                    |  | 44 - 45
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                                    |  | 46     
|                                                                                                                              | 
|3. Financial Statement Schedules                                                                                              |  |        
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002                            |  | 87     



All other schedules
are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.



4. Exhibits



The following exhibits are included with this report or incorporated herein by reference:



|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                
|------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  | Title                                                                                                                                                                          
|        | 
|2.1     |  | Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization. (Incorporated by reference from November 30, 1994 Form 10-KSB.)                                                                         
|        | 
|3.1     |  | Bylaws, as amended through May 15, 1995. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 1995 Form 10-QSB.)                                                                            
|        | 
|3.1.1   |  | Amendment to Bylaws, dated June 2, 1999. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1999 Form 10-QSB.)                                                                         
|        | 
|3.2     |  | Restated Articles of Incorporation as filed July 24, 1998. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1998 Form 10-QSB.)                                                       
|        | 
|3.3     |  | Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, dated July 17, 2003. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2003 Form 10-Q)                                      
|        | 
|3.4     |  | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Incorporated by reference from November 30, 2003 Form 10-K)                                                                               
|        | 
|10.1    |  | Service Agreement among Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc., Dennis G. Hepp and the Company, dated October 16, 1998. (Incorporated by reference from November 30, 1998 Form
10-KSB.)
|        | 
|10.1.1  |  | Service Agreement among Rivertek Medical Systems, Inc., Dennis G. Hepp and the Company, dated January 1, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 2002 Form 10-Q.)        



84



---

##### Table of Contents

|        |   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                
|------- | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |   |  | Title                                                                                                                                                                                          
|10.2    |   |  | Lease between AGBRI Nancy Ridge, LLC and the Company dated June 20, 1997. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1997 Form 10-QSB.)                                                        
|        |  
|10.2.1  |   |  | Amendment to lease agreement between CRV Partners, L.P., and the Company, dated March 21, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 2002 Form 10-Q.)                                       
|        |  
|10.2.2  |   |  | Second Amendment to Lease agreement between CarrAmerica Development Corp., LP and the Company, dated June 28, 2004 (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2004 Form 10-Q)                  
|        |  
|10.3    |   |  | Employment Agreement, dated March 23, 1998, between the Company and Michael K. Perry. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 1998 Form 10-QSB.)                                               
|        |  
|10.4    |   |  | 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, as amended June 10, 1997. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1997 Form 10-QSB.)                                                                 
|        |  
|10.4.1  |   |  | Amendment to 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan dated May 20, 1998. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1998 Form 10-QSB.)                                                           
|        |  
|10.4.2  |   |  | Amendment to 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan dated April 12, 2001. (Incorporated by reference from October 3, 2001 Form S-8.)                                                            
|        |  
|10.4.3  |   |  | Amendment to 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan dated October 17, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 2001 Form 10-Q.)                                                            
|        |  
|10.5    |   |  | Line of Credit Agreement with Imperial Bank, dated January 15, 1999. (Incorporated by reference from February 28, 1999 Form 10-QSB.)                                                           
|        |  
|10.5.1  |   |  | Amended and restated Loan and Security Agreement with Comerica Bank, dated September 14, 2003. (Incorporated by reference from November 30, 2003 Form 10-K)                                    
|        |  
|10.5.2  |   |  | Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated August 26, 2004 (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2004 Form 10-Q)                                   
|        |  
|10.6    |   |  | Warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock to GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., dated August 25, 1999. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 1999
Form 10-QSB.)
|        |  
|10.7*   |   |  | OEM Development and Purchase Agreement between the Company and GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., dated July 7, 2000. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2000 Form
10-QSB.)           
|        |  
|10.7.1  | * |  | Addendum to OEM Development and Purchase Agreement between the Company and GE Marquette Medical Systems, Inc., dated April 24, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from May 31, 2002 Form
10-Q.)  
|        |  
|10.8*   |   |  | Omnibus Amendment between the Company and GE Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from November 30, 2000 Form 10-KSB.)                                    
|        |  
|10.9    |   |  | Co-Development and OEM Agreement between the Company and Philips Medical Systems, a division of PENAC dated July 17, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2002
Form 10-Q.)         
|        |  
|10.10   |   |  | OEM Purchase Agreement between the Company and Vasomedical, Inc. dated August 29, 2002. (Incorporated by reference from August 31, 2002 Form 10-Q.)                                            
|        |  
|21.1    |   |  | List of Companys Subsidiaries.                                                                                                                                                                
|        |  
|23.1    |   |  | Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.                                                                                                                           
|        |  
|31.1    |   |  | Certification pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Michael K. Perry, the Registrants Chief Executive
Officer.     



85



---

##### Table of Contents

|        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                          
|------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit |  | Title                                                                                                                                                                                    
|31.2    |  | Certification pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Steve P. Loomis, the Registrants Chief Financial
Officer.
|        | 
|32.1    |  | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Michael K. Perry, the Registrants Chief Executive
Officer.   
|        | 
|32.2    |  | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Steve P. Loomis, the Registrants Chief Financial
Officer.    

---

|* | Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions of this Exhibit pursuant to Rule 406 promulgated under the Securities Act. Such portions have been omitted and filed
separately with the SEC.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(b) Reports on Form 8-K:



On September 15, 2004, we filed a current report on Form
8-K reporting that we had issued a press release announcing the results of the Companys PREDICT (Prospective Evaluation and Identification of Decompensation by ICG Test) study presented in the symposium, Hemodynamic Factors in Heart
Failure: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Role of Impedance Cardiography during the Eighth Annual Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) meeting in Toronto, Canada.



On September 16, 2004, we filed a current report on Form 8-K reporting that we had issued a press release announcing the
presentation of two ICG studies presented at the Eighth Annual Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) Scientific Meeting in Toronto, Canada.



On September 22, 2004, we filed a current report on Form 8-K reporting that we had issued a press release regarding our financial results for the three
and nine months ended August 31, 2004.



On November 16, 2004,
we filed a current report on Form 8-K reporting that we had issued a press release announcing the appointment of Mark S. Florence to the newly created position of vice president of sales.



86



---

##### Table of Contents

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Schedule II  Valuation and Qualifying Accounts



For the Years Ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002

(In thousands)



|                                 |  |                              |       |                              |       |                                   |       |                         |     |                         |            |  |        |  |   |      
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | ---------------------------- | ----- | --------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------- | --- | ----------------------- | ---------- |  | ------ |  | - | -----
|Column A                         |  | Column B                     |       | Column C                     |       | Column D                          |       | Column E               
|                                 |  |                              |       | Additions                    |       |                                   |       |                        
|Description                      |  | Balance atBeginning ofPeriod |       | Charged to Costsand Expenses |       | Charged toOther Accounts-Revenues |       | Deductions FromReserves |     | Balance at Endof Period
|Allowance for Doubtful Accounts  |  |                              |       |                              |       |                                   |       |                         |     |                         |           
|                                 |  |                              |       |                              |       |                                   |      
|2002                             |  | $                            | 1,425 |                              | 732   |                                   | 1,681 |                         | (2) |                         | 5111,601   |  | (1)(4) |  | $ | 1,726
|                                 |  |                              |       |                              |       |                                   |      
|2003                             |  | $                            | 1,726 |                              | 1,122 |                                   | 1,881 |                         | (2) |                         | 1,2151,574 |  | (1)(4) |  | $ | 1,940
|2004                             |  | $                            | 1,940 |                              | 1,387 |                                   | 1,517 |                         | (2) |                         | 8651,579   |  | (1)(4) |  | $ | 2,400
|Provision for Obsolete Inventory |  |                              |       |                              |       |                                   |       |                         |     |                         |           
|2002                             |  | $                            | 572   |                              | 216   |                                   |      |                         |     |                         | 659        |  | (3)    |  | $ | 129  
|2003                             |  | $                            | 129   |                              | 377   |                                   |      |                         |     |                         | 89         |  | (3)    |  | $ | 417  
|2004                             |  | $                            | 417   |                              | 15    |                                   |      |                         |     |                         | 82         |  | (3)    |  | $ | 350  

---

|(1) | Represents the net write-off of uncollectible accounts (less recoveries).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Represents the net amounts charged against revenues for sales returns.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Represents the net amounts written off as excess, obsolete or slow-moving and adjustments to reserve requirement.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Represents the net amounts written off against the sales return reserve.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.



87



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|                      |  |                                          |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2005 |  | CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
|                      |  |                                         
|                      |  | By:                                      |  | /s/    MICHAEL K.
PERRY
|                      |  |                                          |  | Michael K. Perry       
|                      |  |                                          |  | Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                                                        |  |                                                                                            |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|Signature                                               |  | Title                                                                                      |  | Date          
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    MICHAEL K.
PERRYMichael K.
Perry                 |  | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                       |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    STEVE P. LOOMISSteve P. Loomis                   |  | Vice President Finance,Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    CONNIE R.
CURRANConnie R. Curran, Ed.D.
RN       |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    PETER C. FARRELL,
Ph.D.Peter C. Farrell, Ph.D.   |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    JAMES C.
GILSTRAPJames C.
Gilstrap               |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    RONALD A.
MATRICARIARonald A.
Matricaria         |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    RICHARD O. MARTIN,
Ph.D.Richard O. Martin, Ph.D. |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005
|                                                        |  |                                                                                           
|/s/    RONALD L.
MERRIMANRonald L.
Merriman             |  | Director                                                                                   |  | March 29, 2005



88