alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.57

   [Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request
           for confidential treatment and have been filed separately
                 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.]

                             COLORADO MEDTECH, INC.
                               SPECIAL SALE BONUS
                                  CONFIDENTIAL

The CMED Board of Directors ("BOD") has given Stephen Onody and Greg Gould
special directives for the future of Colorado MEDtech which include the
following objectives:

         1)       [redacted]

         2)       [redacted]

         3)       [redacted]

         4)       [redacted]

         5)       [redacted]

SPECIAL SALE BONUS:

As incentive to accomplish any or all the above, Stephen Onody, Greg Gould and
other key employees who may be required to put in special, extra effort to
achieve the above-stated objectives, the CMED BOD approves the following plan as
a minimum bonus which could be increased if the BOD feels a higher bonus is
appropriate:

SALE BONUS PLAN FORMULA:

If the BOD approves a sale of [redacted] or [redacted], the Sale Bonus Plan Pool
for either of those transactions is $100,000. If the BOD approves a sale of
[redacted], the total Sale Bonus Plan Pool is $200,000. The Sale Bonus Plan Pool
will be distributed as follows:

         Stephen Onody                      30%

         Greg Gould                         30%

         Other Key Employees                40%

In the event the entire Company is sold, other key employees will receive either
(1) the minimum of the above calculated bonus or (2) an increased amount at the
discretion and upon the approval of the BOD. If the BOD approves a sale of the
entire Company, Stephen Onody and Greg Gould will receive the greater of (1) the
above calculated bonus or (2) a bonus based upon the share price of the sale of
the entire Company:

         $[redacted] and $[redacted] per share - a bonus of 40% of their base
         annual salary;

         $[redacted] and $[redacted] per share - a bonus of 75% of their base
         annual salary;

         above $[redacted] per share - a bonus of 100% of their base annual
         salary.

The portion distributed to other key employees will be distributed to the
employees selected by Stephen Onody and Greg Gould with final approval of the
BOD. To receive this bonus, an individual must be an employee of the company on
the day the transaction closes. Payout of the bonus will be made at the closing
of the transaction.

Should any transaction take place involving stock rather than cash, the BOD will
have the option to award the bonus in stock rather than in cash.
Exhibit 99a

---

10172 Linn Station Road
Louisville, KY  40223
(502) 426-4800

April 1, 2002

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs:

We have received representations from Arthur Andersen LLP that their audits of the NTS Properties IV, Ltd. and
NTS-Properties IV, Ltd. Combined Joint Ventures' financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001, were
subject to the quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagements were conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was
appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audits and availability of national office
consultation.  Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to these audits.

|NTS-PROPERTIES IV, LTD.
|-----------------------
|                       
|                       
|By:                    
|                       
|                       
|                       
|                       
|                       
|                       
|                       

|/s/ Gregory A. Wells      
|--------------------------
|                          
|Gregory A. Wells          
|Senior Vice President and 
|Chief Financial Officer of
|NTS Capital Corporation   
|                          
|
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     We, the undersigned directors of the Registrant, hereby severally
constitute and appoint Steven K. Colliatie our true and lawful attorney and
agent, to do any and all things in our names in the capacities indicated below
which said person may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Registrant to
comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules,
regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
1997, including specifically, but not limited to, power and authority to sign
for us in our names in the capacities indicated below the annual report and any
amendments thereto; and we hereby approve, ratify and confirm all that said
person shall do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                             <C>

---------------------------------
Joan H. Schonholtz


---------------------------------
Abbey J. Butler
Director

/s/ Melvin J. Estrin                                            March 19, 1998
---------------------------------
Melvyn J. Estrin
Chairman of the Board, Director


---------------------------------
Nella C. Manes
Director

/s/ Avis Y. Pointer                                             March 19, 1998
---------------------------------
Avis Y. Pointer
Director
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 1, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott Decker 202-245-0330. [Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.] By the board, Leland L. Gardner, Director, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

Anne K. Quinlan, 

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                 Ex Parte No. 492,                             *Montana Rail Link, Inc., and Wisconsin Central Ltd., Joint Petition For Rulemaking With Respect To 49 CFR 1201*, 8 I.C.C. 2d 625 (1992), raised the revenue classification level for Class I railroads from $50 million (1978 dollars) to $250 million (1991 dollars), effective for the reporting year beginning January 1, 1992. The Class II threshold was also raised from $10 million (1978 dollars) to $20 million (1991 dollars).                         
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-23986 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02544-MSK-KLM

KEVIN D. EVANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02544-MSK-KLM Document 5 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02576-BNB Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 16, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**Assets Flow of Funds Matrix for 2003** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARLING MARTINEZ, AKA Darling 

Otoniel Martinez Martinez, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72456 

Agency No. A094-314-745 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 27, 2023**

San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BADE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Darling Martinez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of an 

immigration judge denying his application for withholding of removal and for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 27 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72456 

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 

8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition. 

1. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the crimes 

Martinez suffered in El Salvador were not on account of a protected ground. See 

Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, 846 F.3d 351, 357 (9th Cir. 2017) (explaining that to 

qualify for withholding of removal, a person must show that their life or freedom 

will be threatened because of their “race, religion, nationality, membership in a 

particular social group, or political opinion” (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42))). 

The record does not compel the conclusion that the extortion, shooting at his 

family’s home, and death threat by gang members were motivated by any intent to 

harm Martinez specifically or by anything other than general criminality. See 

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1015-16 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An alien’s desire to be 

free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang 

members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). The BIA therefore did not err in 

denying Martinez’s application for withholding of removal. See id. 

2. Substantial evidence also supports the conclusion that Martinez did 

not demonstrate that he is more likely than not to suffer torture inflicted by, at the 

instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of Salvadoran officials, if 

returned to El Salvador. See Zheng v. Ashcroft, 332 F.3d 1186, 1193-95 (9th Cir. 

2003) (explaining the government acquiescence requirement for CAT relief). The 
3 18-72456 

BIA thus did not err in denying Martinez’s request for relief under CAT. 

PETITION DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1149 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1149

   To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products 
   Inspection Act to authorize the interstate distribution of State-
 inspected meat and poultry if the Secretary of Agriculture determines 
 that the State inspection requirements are at least equal to Federal 
inspection requirements and to require the Secretary to reimburse State 
           agencies for part of the costs of the inspections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2007

   Mr. Kohl (for himself, Mr. Baucus, and Mr. Conrad) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products 
   Inspection Act to authorize the interstate distribution of State-
 inspected meat and poultry if the Secretary of Agriculture determines 
 that the State inspection requirements are at least equal to Federal 
inspection requirements and to require the Secretary to reimburse State 
           agencies for part of the costs of the inspections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE INSPECTED MEAT AND POULTRY 
              PRODUCTS.

    (a) Meat Products.--Section 301(a)(1) of the Federal Meat 
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 661(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The Secretary'' and inserting 
        ``(1)(A) The Secretary'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``solely for distribution within such State''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) The Secretary shall reimburse a State agency 
        administering inspections pursuant to subparagraph (A) for not 
        less than 50 percent and not more than 60 percent of the costs 
        of administering the inspections.''.
    (b) Poultry Products.--Section 5(a)(1) of the Poultry Products 
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 454(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1) The Secretary'' and inserting 
        ``(1)(A) The Secretary'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``solely for distribution within such State''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) The Secretary shall reimburse a State agency 
        administering inspections pursuant to subparagraph (A) for not 
        less than 50 percent and not more than 60 percent of the costs 
        of administering the inspections.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARLA YANETH REGALO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71447

Agency No. A088-029-017

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2015** 

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Karla Yaneth Regalo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

MAR 17 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Regalo testified that she was followed and harassed by gang members who

wanted her to join the gang and/or go out with them, and that she considered the

unwanted attention threatening. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s

determination that Regalo failed to establish she suffered harm rising to the level of

persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir. 2003)

(harassment and physical encounters without any significant physical violence did

not compel finding of past persecution); see also Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d

1049, 1060 (9th Cir. 2009) (harm to family must be closely tied to petitioner). 

Regalo does not challenge the agency’s finding that she failed to establish a wellfounded fear of persecution because she was able to relocate and live safely in San

Salvador for five years before voluntarily returning to her hometown. See

Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not

supported by argument are deemed waived). Thus, we deny the petition as to

Regalo’s asylum claim. 

Because Regalo failed to establish eligibility for asylum, her withholding of

removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71447
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 33-25427, 33-25429,
33-32767, 33-43280, 33-63798, 33-63800, 333-45102, 333-45110 of our report dated
February 22, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hycor
Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------

Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2002



                                       56
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 29, 1997 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                      3,283
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,887
<PP&E>                                          17,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,379)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,410
<BONDS>                                          4,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,904
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,424
<SALES>                                         22,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,045
<CGS>                                           15,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (473)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (473)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

As
an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

This
certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officer serving
the Company and its many constituencies.

This
certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for any purpose
other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date:
March 14, 2008

|James M. Anderson | 
|----------------- | 

57

---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02290-BNB

RICHARD CROW,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.D.O.C.,

SGT. J.A. JAMES (D.R.D.C.), and

MEDICAL UNIT (D.R.D.C.),

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss the Defendant C.D.O.C,” filed on October 26, 2011

(Doc. # 8) is DENIED. Plaintiff may not add or subtract parties or claims to his

Complaint by filing a motion; instead, he must file an Amended Complaint as directed by

the October 19 Order for Amended Complaint. Plaintiff’s failure to file an Amended

Complaint within the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without

further notice.

Dated: October 28, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02290-BNB Document 9 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.**
**Exhibit 99.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned chief financial officer of TaylorCapital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:
         (i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
         (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Dated: November 22, 2002 /s/ J. Christopher AlstrinJ. Christopher Alstrin