alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00506-CV

City of Kyle, Texas, Appellant

v.

1200 S. Old Stagecoach Road, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 19-1492, THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The City of Kyle, Texas has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal and this cause as 

moot. We will grant the motion in part and dismiss this appeal. We deny the request that we

dismiss this cause entirely.

Appellee 1200 S. Old Stagecoach Road, LLC, filed this suit seeking declaratory, 

injunctive, and mandamus relief concerning aspects of Kyle’s annexation of certain real property

and subsequent acts and omissions regarding that real property; Appellee also requested

attorney’s fees incurred and costs of court. Appellant specifically requested relief from Kyle’s 

Ordinance No. 1010. See Kyle, Tex., Ordinance No. 1010 (Sept. 4, 2018). Kyle filed a plea to 

the jurisdiction, then filed this interlocutory appeal of the denial of that plea.

Kyle seeks dismissal of this cause as moot because on June 6, 2023, it passed 

Ordinance No. 1268 which expressly repealed Ordinance No. 1010 and disannexed the real 

property described in Ordinance No. 1010. See Kyle, Tex., Ordinance No. 1268 (June 6, 2023). 
2

Kyle contends that the repeal of the ordinance renders the case moot and that we must reverse 

any order or judgment and dismiss the entire cause. See Heckman v. Williamson County, 

369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). Kyle certified that it had tried but was unable to confer with 

Appellee’s counsel regarding the motion. More than ten days have passed since Kyle filed its 

motion to dismiss, and Appellee has not filed a response to the motion.

We are persuaded that the repeal of Ordinance No. 1010 and the disannexation of 

the real property it affected have rendered Appellee’s substantive request for relief moot. We 

grant the motion to dismiss this appeal and vacate the order denying the plea to the jurisdiction. 

However, the mooting of the dispute over the substantive requests for relief may or may not 

have resolved Appellee’s requests for attorney’s fees.

We grant the motion to dismiss in part, vacate the order denying the plea to the 

jurisdiction, and dismiss this appeal. We deny the motion to dismiss the entire cause. The 

dismissal of this interlocutory appeal returns power to the trial court to consider any remaining

issues and claims.

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Dismissed

Filed: July 14, 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02590-BNB

JOSE VELEZ-AROCHO,

Plaintiff,

v.

VIRTUOSO SOURCING GROUP LLC,

SARAH BILES,

MICHELLE COONEY,

JUDITH A. LASPADA, and

DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

On completion of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, it

appears that this case is not appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case

will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2D. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED November 7, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02590-WJM-CBS Document 9 Filed 11/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-0376-WJM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. EXECUTIVE RECYCLING, INC.,

2. BRANDON RICHTER, and

3. TOR OLSON,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ACCEPTING DEFENDANT RICHTER’S 

RULE 11(c)(1)(C) PLEA AGREEMENT

 

 

This matter is before the Court on the proposed Plea Agreement entered into by

the Government and Defendant Brandon Richter (ECF No. 591). This Plea Agreement

was presented to me for my approval at Defendant Richter’s Change of Plea Hearing

held before the undersigned on February 25, 2016, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim Proc.

(“Rule”) 11 (c)(1)(C). 

At Mr. Richter’s Change of Plea Hearing, I expressly deferred the decision of

whether or not to accept the Parties' Plea Agreement under the provisions of Rule

11(c)(3)(A). As counsel and the parties are aware, I generally do not accept Plea

Agreements entered into pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C). This is because I take my

sentencing responsibilities seriously, and I do not easily relinquish my sentencing

authority and discretion to the parties and their counsel. As a result, and as set f orth in

my Revised Practice Standards, I will do so only in exceptional circumstances.

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 594 Filed 03/14/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Having carefully reviewed the file in this case, however, and after reviewing the

transcript of counsel's arguments at the Change of Plea Hearing in support of their Plea

Agreement, I am convinced that the interests of justice, as well as the best interests of

the parties, are best served by accepting the Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreement

submitted to me on behalf on Defendant Richter. I do so without the benefit of a new

Presentence Investigation Report from the Probation Office, given my significant

familiarity with the law and facts of this case, having not only presided over a three

week trial of all defendants in this case in December 2012, but also having originally

sentenced this Defendant in July 2013 after a thorough review of the original

Presentence Investigation Report prepared for me at that time with regard to this

Defendant.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plea Agreement entered into between the

Government and Defendant Richter and submitted to this Court as ECF No. 591 is

hereby ACCEPTED. The Defendant will be sentenced on August 31, 2016 in

conformity with the Parties’ Plea Agreement and Rule 11(c)(1)(C).

Dated this 14th

 day of March, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

 

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 594 Filed 03/14/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
"Date","Total","Federal","Nonfederal Total","Nonfederal Households","Nonfederal Business","Nonfederal State and local govts"
"1994",4.6,4.7,4.6,7.6,3.8,-4.0
"1995",5.3,4.1,5.7,7.2,7.2,-5.5
"1996",5.2,4.0,5.7,6.8,6.2,-1.5
"1997",5.3,0.6,7.0,6.0,9.0,4.0
"1998",6.9,-1.4,9.6,8.0,12.3,6.3
"","","","","","",""
"1999",6.4,-1.9,8.9,8.3,10.6,3.4
"2000",4.8,-8.0,8.3,8.7,9.4,1.3
"2001",6.2,-0.2,7.6,8.9,6.1,8.9
"2002",6.8,7.6,6.7,9.6,2.6,11.1
"2003",8.1,10.9,7.5,10.0,4.3,8.2
"","","","","","",""
"2003Q1",7.2,5.1,7.7,11.0,4.0,6.9
"2003Q2",11.0,19.6,9.1,11.5,5.9,11.3
"2003Q3",7.0,8.2,6.8,9.4,3.5,7.2
"2003Q4",6.2,9.1,5.5,6.8,3.7,6.3
"","","","","","",""
"2004Q1",9.1,12.0,8.5,11.4,4.6,9.5
"2004Q2",7.0,10.7,6.2,8.5,3.6,4.0
"2004Q3",7.4,4.9,8.0,9.1,5.1,14.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENT INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             353,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,079,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,851,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,102,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,963,000
<PP&E>                                             638,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     129,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,721,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,796,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                            44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,881,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,721,000
<SALES>                                          9,931,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,931,000
<CGS>                                            9,557,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,557,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,410,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,175,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,175,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,175,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.27)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00396-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. FERNANDEZ VALENTE CHAVEZ-PEREZ,

 a/k/a Manuel CHAVEZ,

 a/k/a Valente CHAVEZ-Perez,

 a/k/a Fernando PEREZ-Solis,

 a/k/a Fernandez PEREZ-Solis,

Defendant.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#11) on October 13, 2011, by Defendant. The Court construes this Notice as a motion to

change his/her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for November 14, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for January 30, 2012, at 3:30 p.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

DATED this 14th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, James W. Hansen, Chief Executive Officer of Ciprico Inc., certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K of Ciprico Inc.;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: December 20, 2004 | Signature: | /s/ James W. Hansen     |   |
|--------------------------|------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |       | James W. Hansen         |
|                     |       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02544-MSK-KLM

KEVIN D. EVANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File

First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Freedom of Information Act, and Rule 7.1(a)

Certification [#37] (the “Motion”). On April 24, 2013, Chief Judge Krieger imposed a stay

on this case “until 30 days after a final resolution of all appeals of Judicial Watch v. Dept.

of Defense, Civil Action No. 11-890 (JEB) (D.C.C.).” Order [#28] at 3. The parties have

informed the Court that the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in that case on

January 13, 2014, thereby exhausting all appeals. Thus, the stay in this matter expired by

the terms of Chief Judge Krieger’s Order [#28] on February 12, 2014. Plaintiff now seeks

leave to file an Amended Complaint, to which Defendant is unopposed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall update the electronic docket

to reflect that the stay in this case was lifted on February 12, 2014.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion [#37] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court

shall accept Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and attached exhibits [#37-1, #37-2, #37-3, #37-

4, #37-5] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order.

Dated: March 26, 2014

Case 1:11-cv-02544-MSK-KLM Document 39 Filed 03/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02549-WYD-KLM 

CLARK WILSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA, 

Defendant. 

ORDER OF RECUSAL 

This matter is before me on a review of the file. On November 2, 2011, Ms. 

Janet Savage was added as counsel for the Defendant via the Waiver of Service (ECF 

No. 6). Due to the fact that Ms. Savage is a former professional colleague of mine as 

well as a personal friend, I believe it would be inappropriate for me to preside over this 

case. Accordingly, I find that I should recuse myself from the case. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the judge's file be returned to the clerk and that the case be 

reassigned by random draw. 

Dated: November 4, 2011 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02549-RPM Document 7 Filed 11/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1461 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1461

 To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from imposing 
  penalties against a State under the Temporary Assistance for Needy 
  Families program for failure to satisfy minimum work participation 
 rates or comply with work participation verification procedures with 
respect to months beginning after September 2006 and before the end of 
the 12-month period that begins on the date the Secretary approves the 
                    State's work verification plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2007

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from imposing 
  penalties against a State under the Temporary Assistance for Needy 
  Families program for failure to satisfy minimum work participation 
 rates or comply with work participation verification procedures with 
respect to months beginning after September 2006 and before the end of 
the 12-month period that begins on the date the Secretary approves the 
                    State's work verification plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON IMPOSITION OF CERTAIN PENALTIES UNDER TANF.

    Notwithstanding subpart F of part 261 and part 262 of title 45, 
Code of Federal Regulations (relating to State work verification plans 
required under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program) or 
any other provision of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
shall not reduce the State family assistance grant payable to a State 
for a fiscal year under section 403(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 603(a)), or otherwise impose a penalty against a State for 
failure to comply with subsection (a) or (i)(2) of section 407 of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 607) with respect to months beginning 
after September 2006 and before the end of the 12-month period that 
begins on the date the Secretary notifies the State that the work 
verification plan submitted by the State pursuant to subpart F of part 
261 of title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, satisfies the 
requirements of such subpart.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Louise M. Bonvechio


Louise M. Bonvechio, Vice President & CFO





April 27, 2010
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 11
Case 1:11-cr-00373-WJM Document 63 Filed 07/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 11
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1310 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an extension 

of increased payments for ground ambulance services under the Medicare 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. CONRAD) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for an extension of increased payments for ground ambulance services under the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Ambulance 

5 Payment Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INCREASED MEDICARE PAYMENTS 

7 FOR GROUND AMBULANCE SERVICES. 

8 Section 1834(l)(13) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(13)) is amended— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1310 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), in the heading, by 

2 striking ‘‘IN GENERAL’’ and inserting ‘‘FOR THE

3 SECOND HALF OF 2004 AND FOR 2005 AND 2006’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub5 paragraph (C); 

6 (3) by inserting the following after subpara7 graph (A): 

8 ‘‘(B) FOR 2008 AND 2009.—After com9 puting the rates with respect to ground ambu10 lance services under the other applicable provi11 sions of this subsection, in the case of such 

12 services furnished on or after January 1, 2008, 

13 and before January 1, 2010, the fee schedule 

14 established under this section shall provide that 

15 the rate for the service otherwise established, 

16 after application of any increase under para17 graphs (11) and (12), shall be increased by 5 

18 percent.’’; and 

19 (4) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated by 

20 paragraph (2)— 

21 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘APPLICA22 TION OF INCREASED PAYMENTS AFTER 2006’’ 

23 and inserting ‘‘NO EFFECT ON SUBSEQUENT

24 PERIODS’’; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 1310 IS

1 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

2 sentence: ‘‘The increased payments under sub3 paragraph (B) shall not be taken into account 

4 in calculating payments for services furnished 

5 after the period specified in such subpara6 graph.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS