alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of David Ullman, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

November 19,1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Nicholas C. Cooper*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding the respondent was charged with two *180charges of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained only the second charge.

Charge two alleged that the respondent engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, in that, from November 1983 until January 1984 the respondent was employed and paid a salary as an associate in a law office and during that period of time he illegally and unethically collected unemployment compensation from the New York State Department of Labor’s Unemployment Insurance Division.

The respondent moves to confirm so much of the report of the Special Referee as fails to sustain charge one and to otherwise disaffirm the report. The petitioner Grievance Committee cross-moves to confirm so much of the report as sustains charge two and to otherwise disaffirm the report.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the report of the Special Referee. The respondent is guilty of the professional misconduct outlined above. The respondent’s motion is granted to the extent that it seeks to confirm the failure to sustain charge one, and is otherwise denied. The petitioner’s cross motion is granted to the extent that it seeks to confirm the sustaining of charge two, and is otherwise denied.

In determining an appropriate measure of discipline to be imposed, we have taken into consideration the respondent’s previously unblemished record, the financial constraints which may have contributed to this misconduct, the ample character evidence submitted on his behalf, and the fact that the respondent voluntarily terminated the unemployment compensation, and refunded the $1,000 overpayment. Accordingly, the respondent should be and is hereby censured for his professional misconduct.

Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the respondent’s motion is granted to the extent that it seeks to confirm the failure to sustain charge one, and the motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the petitioner’s cross motion is granted to the extent that it seeks to confirm so much of the report as sustained charge two, and the cross motion is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent David Ullman is hereby censured for his professional misconduct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,792,000
<SECURITIES>                                16,780,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,822,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,791,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,319,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,435,000
<PP&E>                                      21,279,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,922,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,672,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,532,000
<BONDS>                                      4,806,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       116,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,198,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,672,000
<SALES>                                     13,264,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,264,000
<CGS>                                        8,382,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,382,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,441,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,485,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (394,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,091,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02449-BNB-KMT

UNITED FOOD & COMMERICAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 7,

Plaintiff,

v.

KING SOOPERS, INC.,

Defendant.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with

the Order [40] entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on, which order is incorporated

herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is GRANTED; 

2. That the request to confirm and enforce the arbitration award of Arbitrator Harold G.

Wren issued on June 3, 2011 [16] is GRANTED; 

3. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of plaintiff United Food & Commercial

Workers International Union, Local No. 7, and against defendant King Soopers, Inc.;

4. That the plaintiff is AWARDED its costs to be taxed and allowed in the time and

manner prescribed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 27 day of March, 2014. th

FOR THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02449-BNB-KMT Document 41 Filed 03/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk

By: s/ Brandy Simmons 

Brandy Simmons

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02449-BNB-KMT Document 41 Filed 03/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 24HOLDINGS INC.

            24Holdings Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify the following:

            1. The name of the corporation is 24Holdings Inc.

            2. The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by inserting the following three new paragraphs following the current
text of Article FOURTH:

                  Effective as of October 23, 2006 (the "Effective Date"), each
         125 shares of Common Stock of the Corporation ("Common Stock") then
         issued and outstanding, shall be automatically reclassified into one
         share of Common Stock (the `Reverse Stock Split"). All fractional
         interests in shares shall be rounded to the nearest whole share after
         such reclassification.

                  From and after the Effective Date, the amount of capital
         represented by the Common Stock immediately after the Effective Date
         shall be the same as the amount of capital represented by such shares
         immediately prior to the Effective Date, until thereafter reduced or
         increased in accordance with applicable law. The par value of a share
         of Common Stock shall remain unchanged after the Reverse Stock Split at
         $0.001 per share.

                  From and after the Effective Date, the total number of shares
         of all classes of capital stock which the Corporation shall have
         authority to issue shall remain unchanged.

            3. The amendment of the certificate of incorporation herein
certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 228
and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. Prompt written
notice of the adoption of the amendment herein certified has been given to those
stockholders who did not consent in writing thereto, as provided in Section 228
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

            4. For accounting purposes only, the effective date of this
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation shall be October
23, 2006.

                           [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]


<PAGE>



Executed on this 11th day of October, 2006.


                                 24HOLDINGS INC.

                                 By: /s/ Arnold Kling
                                     -----------------------
                                     Arnold Kling, President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02540-BNB

PAUL LEWIS RIEED JOHNSONNE, a/k/a Paul Edward Johnson,

Applicant,

v.

AGRICULTUIERRE SURGEON GENERAL, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Applicant, Paul Edward Johnson, initiated this action by filing pro se an

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order filed

on October 5, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland directed Mr. Johnson to cure

certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge

Boland ordered Mr. Johnson either to pay the filing fee or to file a properly supported

motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and

to file an amended application that is intelligible and written in English. Mr. Johnson

was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure

the deficiencies within thirty days.

Mr. Johnson has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed and he

has failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Boland’s October 5 order. 

Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the

deficiencies. Accordingly, it is

Case 1:11-cv-02540-LTB Document 3 Filed 11/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that the application is denied and the action is dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr.

Johnson failed to cure the deficiencies as directed.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 15th day of November , 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:11-cv-02540-LTB Document 3 Filed 11/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02433-BNB
(Removal from Logan County District Court, Colorado, Case Nos. 10-S-09, 10-S-12, 10-
S-34, 11-S-10, and 11-S-24)

LEROY W. BAKER, #82907, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DENVER, COLORADO

SEP 20 2011

GREGORY C. LANGHAM
CLERK

Plaintiff,
Vv.

TOM CLEMENTS, Dir., D.O.C., and
KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Ster. Corr. Fac.,

Defendants.

ORDER FOR SUMMARY REMAND

Plaintiff, Leroy W. Baker, filed pro se a document titled “Removal of Cases from
State to Federal Court Pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 throu [sic] 1446 + F.R.C.P Rule
81.” The Court must construe Mr. Baker's filings liberally because he is representing
himself. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v. Bellmon, 935
F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). However, the Court should not be the pro se
litigant’s advocate. Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110. For the reason stated below, this action will
be remanded summarily to the Logan County District Court.

The Court has reviewed the Notice of Removal and finds that it is deficient. Mr.
Baker seeks to remove to this Court Case Nos. 10-S-09, 10-S-12, 10-S-34, 11-S-10,
and 11-S-24, six civil actions filed by Mr. Baker in the Thirteenth Judicial District in
Logan County, Colorado. Only a defendant in a state court action may remove an

action from state court to the federal district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). Mr. Baker


has also failed to provide “a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal,
together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant
or defendants in such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). Therefore, this action will be
remanded summarily to the Logan County District Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this action is remanded summarily to the Logan County District
Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall mail a certified copy of
this order to the clerk of the Logan County District Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this__20" day of __ September 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02433-BNB

Leroy W Baker

Prisoner No. 82907
Sterling Correctional Facility
PO Box 6000

Sterling, CO 80751

James P DeVore

Logan County District Court
110 N Riverview Rd #205
Sterling, CO 80751

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 20, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

» HW

"Deputy Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, et. al. 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME IN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

______________________________________________________________________________ 

 THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on Claimant’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time in which to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment, and being fully 

advised in the premises, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in 

which to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Claimant is allowed up to 

and including Monday, November 18, 2013, in which to file a Response to the Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Docket No. 78). 

DATED:_________________ 

 BY THE COURT: 

 ____________________________________ 

 District Court Judge

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 79-1 filed 11/14/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 153 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 153

   To provide for the monitoring of the long-term medical health of 
firefighters who responded to emergencies in certain disaster areas and 
                for the treatment of such firefighters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                            February 5, 2007

 Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the monitoring of the long-term medical health of 
firefighters who responded to emergencies in certain disaster areas and 
                for the treatment of such firefighters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Healthy Firefighters Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Firefighters from the San Jacinto Ranger District 
        responded to the Esperanza Incident wildfire in southern 
        California in October of 2006.
            (2) Five firefighters from the San Jacinto Ranger District 
        lost their lives as a consequence of fighting that fire.

SEC. 3. MONITORING AND TREATMENT OF FIREFIGHTERS IN DISASTER AREAS.

    (a) In General.--The United States Fire Administration, after 
consultation with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health, shall--
            (1) contract with an appropriate, locally based medical 
        research university to conduct long-term medical health 
        monitoring of those firefighters who responded to emergencies 
        in any areas referred to in subsection (b); and
            (2) in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services, provide for the treatment of firefighters described 
        in paragraph (1) who suffer health-related conditions as a 
        result of responding to such emergencies.
    (b) Affected Firefighters.--An area referred to in this subsection 
is any area which is declared a disaster area by the Federal 
Government.
    (c) Health Monitoring.--The long-term health monitoring referred to 
in subsection (a) shall include--
            (1) pulmonary illness, neurological damage, and 
        cardiovascular damage; and
            (2) exposure documentation.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the United States Fire Administration to carry out this 
section, such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2007 
through 2011.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                      1000 Morgan Keegan Tower
                                                      Fifty North Front Street
                                                      Memphis, TN 38103
                                                      Telephone (901) 522 2000
                                                      Facsimile (901) 523 2045


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors
 of TBC Corporation:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 for the Company's 1989
Stock Incentive Plan (Reg. No. 33-43166) and in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 for the Company's 1989 Stock Incentive Plan (Reg. No. 333-48802) of TBC
Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 31, 2005 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
March 31, 2005



                                    74 of 79
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated June 14, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over
financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Arctic Cat Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Arctic Cat Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-37065, effective October 1,
1990, File No. 33-69916, effective October 4, 1993, File No. 33-97244, effective September 22, 1995, File No. 333-99253,
effective September 6, 2002, and File No. 333-145784, effective August 29, 2007).

/s/GRANT
THORNTON LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 14, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 24(a)


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the
Anuhco, Inc. 1992 Incentive Stock Plan, File No. 33-51494, the
American Carriers, Inc. 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan, File No.
2-86915, and the Stock Option Agreement by and between Anuhco, Inc.
and C. Ted McCarter, effective May 31, 1995, File No. 33-62553, of
our report dated February 23, 1996 on our audit of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Anuhco,
Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and for the year then ended, which
report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.


                                /s/ Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
                                COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.


Kansas City, Missouri

March 11, 1996




</PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify
that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: November 3, 2006 |  | /s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR                    
|                        |  | Jeffrey W. Taylor Chief Executive
Officer
|                        | 
|Dated: November 3, 2006 |  | /s/ ROBIN VANCASTLE                      
|                        |  | Robin VanCastle Chief Accounting
Officer 



55
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000719958
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1983-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         173,345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               292,757
<PP&E>                                      35,411,185
<DEPRECIATION>                              34,628,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,141,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     860,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,141,415
<SALES>                                        596,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               605,334
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  493,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                112,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   112,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    15.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>