alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

As an accompaniment tothe Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Anderson,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

·                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and

·                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for theperiods presented.

This certification isbased on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faitheffort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officerserving the Company and its many constituencies.

This certification merelyaccompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed forpurposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for anypurpose other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date: March 12, 2007
| /s/ James M. Anderson |   |
|-----------------------|--------|

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00376-WJM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. EXECUTIVE RECYCLING, INC.,

2. BRANDON RICHTER, and

3. TOR OLSON,

Defendants.

 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON ALL REMAINING 

SENTENCING-RELATED ISSUES AND MOTIONS

 

 

After a jury trial, Defendants were convicted on a number of counts involving wire

fraud, violation of environmental regulations, and obstruction of justice. (ECF No. 271.)

On April 3, 2013, the Court held a full-day evidentiary hearing on the amount of loss

attributable to Defendants’ fraud for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. (ECF No. 341.) 

Individualized sentencing hearings are currently set for April 29-30, 2013. (ECF No.

316.)

The purpose of this Order is to set deadlines and briefing schedules for all

remaining motions and outstanding issues. The Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The Government’s response to Defendant’s Objections (ECF Nos. 317, 318,

319) to the Presentence Investigation Reports (ECF Nos. 307, 308, 312) shall be

filed by April 15, 2013. No replies will be permitted;
2

2. The Probation Officers assigned to this case shall meet their obligations under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(g) not later than April 30, 2013; 

3. All sentencing-related motions shall be filed by April 15, 2013. Any response

thereto must be filed by April 26, 2013. No replies will be permitted; 

4. In due course after the briefing is complete, the Court will issue a written order

adjudicating the Objections to the Presentence Investigation Reports as well as

calculating the amount of loss for purposes of determining the loss-related

sentencing enhancement, if any, to be imposed by the Court pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1;

5. The sentencing hearings scheduled for April 29 and 30, 2013 are VACATED. 

Following entry of the Court’s written order on the parties’ Objections and the

amount of loss, the Court will reset the individualized sentencing hearings. At

the individualized sentencing hearings, the Court will address all motions for nonguideline sentences and any other outstanding sentencing issues. 

Dated this 5 day of April, 2013. th

BY THE COURT:

 

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CASE NO. 11-cr-00355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAUNITA WEINGART,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

 _____________________________________________________________________________

The Office of the Federal Public Defender, by and through undersigned counsel hereby

enters its appearance in the above captioned case.

Respectfully submitted,

RAYMOND P. MOORE

Federal Public Defender

s/ Edward A. Pluss 

Edward A. Pluss

Assistant Federal Public Defender

633 17 Street, Suite 1000 th

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 294-7002

FAX: (303) 294-1192

 Edward.Pluss@fd.org

Attorney for Defendant

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 12 filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 9/7/2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following email addresses:

Linda Kaufman, AUSA

email: linda.kaufman@usdoj.gov

and I hereby certify that I have mailed or served the document or paper to the following non

CM/ECF participant in the manner (mail, hand-delivery, etc.) indicated by the non-participant’s

name:

Waunita Weingart (via Mail)

c/o DDC

s/ Edward A. Pluss 

Edward A. Pluss

Assistant Federal Public Defender

633 17 Street, Suite 1000 th

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 294-7002

FAX: (303) 294-1192

 Edward.Pluss@fd.org

Attorney for Defendant

2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 12 filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: June 10, 2004Release dates | 
 Coded tables | 
 Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | 
 PDF (450 KB)
L.227 Investment in Bank Personal Trusts and Estates
   Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted                                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Description
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003   Q1
2003   Q2
2003   Q3
2003   Q4
2004   Q1
LineBank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	942.5
	1001.0
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	819.6
	877.0
	885.0
	932.4
	955.0
	1Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	942.5
	1001.0
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	819.6
	877.0
	885.0
	932.4
	955.0
	2
|
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|Release dates | 
Coded tables | 
Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releasesHome | Economic research and
dataAccessibility | Contact Us Last update: June 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phaneesh Murthy, Chief
Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/S/    PHANEESH
MURTHY                              
|Phaneesh Murthy Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: October 22, 2010
#### The Metropolitan Savings & Loan Co. *v.*Hensch et al.

(No. 25266

Decided April 3, 1935.)

*Mr. C. J. Hoyt,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Bussell G. Mock,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
# **EXHIBIT32.2**

# **CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Financial Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedMarch 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
| Date: June 14, 2007 |                           |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                |   /s/ Timothy  C. Delmore |   |
|                |                           | Timothy C.  Delmore, |
|                |                           | Chief Financial  Officer |
|                     |                                |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:   November 10, 2008
    /s/ John A. UstaszewskiJohn A. UstaszewskiTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 33.
#### WHELAN DRUG v. LACK.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. v. GIBSON.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          21,977
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     61,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,306
<PP&E>                                         324,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                 185,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          686,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,054
<OTHER-SE>                                     403,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,912
<SALES>                                          9,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,523
<CGS>                                            4,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,069,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,064,486)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,064,486)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,064,486)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-3120

JOHNNY DEAN POWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KRATCH, Arresting Officer Detective; SUNPAPERS; PETER HERMANN; JAYNE MILLER, WBAL News

Reporter,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-2968-DKC)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Dean Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Powell v. Kratch, No. CA-95-2968-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 27, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02097–REB–KMT

M. GABRIEL MCFARLAND,

Plaintiff,

v. 

TRANS UNION,

EQUIFAX, and

EXPERIAN, INC., 

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint” (Doc. No. 21, filed November 14, 2011) is

GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to file the “First

Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 21-1). 

Dated: December 2, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 27 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Giga-tronics Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the period ending March 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Mark H. Cosmez II, Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ MARK H. COSMEZ IIMark H. Cosmez IIVP Finance, CFO and Secretary06/13/05Date
 51
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00233

- CR

___________________________

O n Appeal from the 432nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1749454

Before K err, Birdwell, and Bassel , JJ. M emorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr 

### J OSEPH 

### D INGLER 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appel lant Joseph Di ngler is awa iting trial on a drug

- possession charge

. Although he has appointed couns el, Dingler , actin g pro se , filed a document entitled

“ *SPECIAL APP EARANCE*: N ot ice of Appeal and Brief on Appeal .” We wr ote to Dingler express ing our c oncern that we l ack jurisdiction over his appeal because the
trial cour t has not entered an y appealable orders

. We explained that in c riminal cases, our jurisd iction i s ge nerally limited to appeals from conviction judgment s. See McKown
v. S tate , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per c uriam)

. We
warned Dingler that un less he or any party filed a response showing grounds for continuing t he appeal, we c ould dismiss th e appeal f or want of jurisdiction. See Tex . R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3.
D ingler ’ s appointed counsel has not responded , but Di ngler has . I n his pro se

r esponse s , Dingler asser ts that the t rial court lacks person al and subject

- matter jurisdictio n and complai ns about his appointed counsel ’ s represent ation and the trial

court ’ s administration of his case

. 1 He also a sk s for additional time to furthe r respond

to our jurisdictional inquiry

. In addition to his response , Dingler ha s filed motions to

1 In one of his responses , Dingler requests that w e alternatively construe his filing s as a petition for writ of mandamus. We have done so , and we deny manda mus relief

. See Tex. R. Ap p. P. 52.3, 52.8(a); In re Commitment of Rensha w , 672 S.W.3d 426 , 427

– 28 (Tex. 2023) ( orig. proceeding) (direct ing court of appeals to consider Renshaw ’s alternative request for mandamus rel i ef).3 dis qualify the trial

- court judg e and to disqualify and substitute Dingler ’ s appo inted
counsel.
I n c riminal cases, we ge neral ly ha v e jurisdiction over appeals by criminal
defen dants only after conviction , and we have no “ jurisdiction to review interlocutory

or ders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted to us by law

. ” McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 16 1

. Here , Dingler ’ s case i s still pending in the trial court , and there is no conviction judgment. And Dingler did not identif y in his response any appealable
in terlocutory order s . A ccordi ngly, we deny Dingler ’ s reques t f or additional time to

re spon d to our letter a nd h is pending motions , and we dismiss this appeal f or want of jurisdiction. S ee Tex . R. App. P. 43.2(f); McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161

.

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr E lizabeth Kerr J ustice
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered : October 26, 2023
<PAGE>   1
                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS




To Foothill Independent Bancorp:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
2-89744 on Form S-8 filed March 1, 1984, Registration Statement No. 33-57586 on
Form S-8 filed January 29, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-64584 on Form S-8
filed June 17, 1993, and Registration Statement No. 33-83854 on Form S-3 filed
September 12, 1994, of our report dated January 26, 1996 on the consolidated
financial statements of Foothill Independent Bancorp as of December 31, 1995 and
1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1995
included at Page 35 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995.

                                        /s/ Vavrinek Trine Day & Co.

                                        VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & COMPANY
                                        Certified Public Accountants

March 26, 1996
Rancho Cucamonga, California




                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant



|1. | KT Services, Inc.
|-- | -----------------

100% owned subsidiary

Incorporated in the State of Washington



|2. | KTI Limited
|-- | -----------

100% owned by Key Tronic Europe, LTD

Incorporated in Ireland



|3. | Key Tronic Europe, LTD
|-- | ----------------------

100% owned subsidiary

Incorporated in the Cayman Islands



|4. | Key Tronic Juarez, SA de CV
|-- | ---------------------------

100% owned subsidiary

Incorporated in Mexico



|5. | Key Tronic China LTD
|-- | --------------------

100% owned subsidiary

Incorporated in the State of Washington



|6. | Key Tronic Computer Peripherals (Shanghai) Co. LTD
|-- | --------------------------------------------------

100%
owned subsidiary

Incorporated in Republic of China



|7. | Key Tronic Reynosa, S.A. de CV
|-- | ------------------------------

100% owned subsidiary

Incorporated in Mexico