alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          55,425
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     189,836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                270,758
<PP&E>                                          73,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  358,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           116,195
<BONDS>                                         138,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        122
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    358,175
<SALES>                                         256,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                256,332
<CGS>                                           208,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   208,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,571)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Spencer Chemical Company/Jayhawk Works near Pittsburg, Kansas, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On August 15, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who worked at Spencer Chemical Company/Jayhawk Works near Pittsburg, Kansas, from January 1, 1956 through December 31, 1961 for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                    This designation became effective on September 14, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                    (14)(C). Hence, beginning on September 14, 2008, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: September 22, 2008.

Christine M. Branche,

Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 

 [FR Doc. E8-23892 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Arnold P. Kling,  President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Arnold P. Kling
-----------------------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President
July 26, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02528-PAB-MEH Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02596-MSK-KLM

PRIDE SERVICES, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation,

CALVIN BLACK, in his official capacity,

CALVIN (I) BLACK, in his individual capacity, and

ONE OR MORE JOHN DOES,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling

Order Deadlines [Docket No. 34; Filed July 18, 2012] (the “Motion”). On March 5, 2012,

the Court entered an Order staying all discovery in this matter, except for discovery related

to Plaintiff’s claims for declaratory/injunctive relief and the identification of the John Doe

Defendants, pending resolution of the Motions to Dismiss [#13, #15]. See Order [#33] at

5-6. Because the Motions to Dismiss have not been adjudicated, the parties request that

the Court vacate all upcoming case deadlines as set forth in the Scheduling Order [#28],

including the upcoming Discovery Deadline set for September 10, 2012. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#34] is GRANTED. All future deadlines

set forth in the Scheduling Order are VACATED and will be reset, if appropriate, after a

ruling on the pending Motions to Dismiss.

Dated: July 23, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02596-RM-KLM Document 36 Filed 07/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.5

                                 ATG LETTERHEAD


VIA FACSIMILE                                                      May 4, 2000


Name


RE: STOCK OPTIONS


Dear Name:

     We have been discussing certain amendments to your Stock Option
Agreements dated ___________ covering a total of _______ shares at an
exercise price of ____ per share.

     ATG agrees to reduce the exercise price under the Agreements to the
high closing bid price on the trading day prior to exercise. Further, the
Agreements terminate twenty (20) business days after the effective date of a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the ______ shares of common stock
underlying the options to be filed by ATG as soon as practicable.

     A form of notice of exercise of stock option is attached for your
convenience.

     The foregoing is subject to the approval of ATG Board of Directors
which must be obtained prior to the filing of the registration statement.

     If you agree to the foregoing amendments, please sign below and return
a copy to me.


                                         Very truly yours,

                                         Lawrence J. Brady
                                         Chief Executive Officer


I agree to the foregoing amendments.


----------------
Name


<PAGE>


                         NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF OPTION




TO:  American Technologies Group, Inc.
     1017 South Mountain Avenue
     Monrovia, California 91016


     The undersigned hereby exercises, according to the terms and conditions
thereof, the right to purchase _______ Shares of Common Stock, evidenced by the
Stock Option Agreements dated ____________, as amended, and herewith makes
payment of the purchase price in full.

     Please register my certificate for _______ shares of ATG common stock
as follows:

     ______________________________

The certificate should be sent to:


      _____________________________
      _____________________________
      _____________________________


Date:______________________________

Name:______________________________

Signature:_________________________
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
  Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
  2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004
  (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
  indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|Dated: August 13, 2004 | /s/ Lutz Klingmann                       
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                       | Lutz Klingmann                           
|                       | President and Principal Financial Officer

---
#### Mary Scott, Defendant in Error, v. John Howard, Plaintiff in Error.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

May 19, 1890

Appellate Practice: abstract. Where a cause was disposed of on demurrer to the petition in the trial court and the abstract fails to set out the petition, the appellate court will dismiss the writ of error.

*Appeal -from the Jackson Circuit Court.*— Hon. J. H. Slover, Judge.

Writ dismissed.

*A. P. Barton*and *L. H. Waters,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. C.*Paxton, for defendant in error.

Ellison, J.

This cause was disposed of on demurrer to the petition in the court below. The demurrer being overruled defendant appealed to this court. The petition is for an injunction, and the *489demurrer is that it does not state facts to constitute a cause of action. That “ on the facts stated in said petition plaintiff is entitled to no relief.” The petition is not set out in the abstract as required by our rules and we, therefore, have no means of knowing what allegations the petition may contain. We have so frequently ruled on the necessity of abstracts thht we need not refer to the particular authorities. We are not alone in these decisions. The supreme court makes strict enforcement of the same rule. *Craig v. Scudder,*98 Mo. 664; *Long*v. Long, 96 Mo. 180; *Manufacturer's Sav. Bank v. Iron Co.,*97 Mo. 38; *Flannery v. Railroad,*97 Mo. 192. We will, therefore, dismiss the writ of error.

All concur.
#### BENSON v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 25 48

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Dav id Ant ho ny Steb bi ns
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Leg al Aidof Ark an sa s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Har ris on

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 4, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Decem

be r 9, 2 01 3 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BYE, andKELLY , Cir cu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Dav id St eb bi ns ap pe a l s th e di st ric t co ur t’s de ni al of hi s m ot io n to se t as id e 1 jud gm en t on th e gr ou nd of jud ic ia l bi as
. Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we ho ld th at th e co ur t

The Hon or ab le P.K. Hol m es , III, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r 1 th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s.di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g th e m ot io n be cau se no ex cep ti o n a l

ci rcu m st an ces warra nt ed rel ie f fro m th e ju d gm en t, se e Harl ey v. Zoe sc h, 41 3 F.3 d 86 6, 87 1 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ) (s ta nd ard fo r gr an ti ng Fed

. R. Ci v. P. 60 (b )(6 ) m ot io n) , an d St eb bi ns di d no t m a k e a sh owi ng of jud ic ia l bi as by po in ti ng to ad ve rs e ru li ng s in ot he r cas es he ha s br ou gh t, se e Am

. Prai rie Co ns tr. Co

. v. Hoi ch , 56 0 F.3 d 78 0, 78 9- 90 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (m ov an t be ars su bs ta nt ia l bu rd en of pr ov in g jud ic ia l pa rti al it y ); se e al so In re Ty le r, 83 9 F.2 d 12 90 , 12 90 -9 1, 12 95 (8 th Ci r. 19 88 ) (p er cu ria m ) (co ur t ha s di sc ret io n to pl ace reas on ab le fil in g res tri ct io ns on li ti ga nt who fla gr an tl y an d rep eat ed ly abu se s ju di ci al pro ces s b y fil in g n um ero us m eri tl es s l aws ui ts ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.6.3


                The Third Amendment to the Employment Agreement



This Third Amendment dated October 16, 1997 is made between Madison River
Telephone Company, LLC ("Holdings") and James D. Ogg, ("Executive") pursuant to
paragraph 11 of the Employment Agreement between Holdings and Executive dated
April 17, 1996 ("Employment Agreement").


1.   Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended by inserting the
     following after the first full sentence:


          "Notwithstanding the foregoing, the closing of MebCom Communications,
          Inc. shall not be considered the first acquisition and its closing
          date shall not be considered the First Acquisition Closing Date for
          purposes of paragraph 2 (Term of Employment), this paragraph 3
          (Compensation) and paragraph 6 (Termination of Employment)."


2.   Section 8, third sentence shall be amended by replacing the place of
     arbitration submission from "Chicago, Illinois" to "Raleigh-Durham
     metropolitan area of North Carolina" and by replacing the language "in
     accordance with Illinois law" with "in accordance with Delaware law".


All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and
effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and Holdings have caused this Second Amendment to
the Employment Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above.


                         Madison River Telephone Company, LLC


                         by:   J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
                             -------------------------------


                               JAMES D. OGG
                         -----------------------------------
                         Executive
#### Strawn, Trustee, *v.*Iams

(No. 2).

Argued Oct. 8, 1914.

Appeal, No. 150, Oct. T., 1914, by George F. Auld, defendant, from judgment of O. P. Washington Co., Aug. T., 1912, No. 444, on directed verdict for plaintiff in case of John H. Strawn, Trustee, v. James L. lams and George F. Auld, with notice to James W. Closser and Oorbly K. Spragg, assignees for the benefit of creditors of said James L. lams, and Clement H. Powell, terre tenants.

Before Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

*John G. Bane,*with him *James A. Wiley, Rufus Marriner*and *James J. Purman,*for appellant.

*James I. Brownson,*with him *John B. Wendt,*for appellee.

January 2, 1915:

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

This appeal raises no questions which were not fully considered and passed upon in the case in which the opinion has just been handed down at this same term, 247 Pa. 132. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment here is affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 Periodically, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) publishes abstracts of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of the clearance requests submitted to OMB for review, e-mail 
                    *paperwork@hrsa.gov*
                     or call the HRSA Reports Clearance Office on (301) 443-1129. The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: Proposed Project:  Application for Certification and Recertification as a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Look-Alike (OMB No. 0915-0142): Revision The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) collects applicant information for organizations applying for certification or recertification as a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Look-Alike for purposes of cost-based reimbursement under the Medicaid and Medicare programs. The information contained in the application guidance reflects legislative, policy, and technical requirements for applicant organizations. The estimated burden is as follows: 
                    ( print page 59638) Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Responses per 
                             respondent
Hours per 
                             response
Total burden hoursApplication
40
1
100
4,000Recertification
100
1
15
1,500Total
140


5,500
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to the desk officer for HRSA, either by e-mail to 
                    *OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov*
                     or by fax to 202-395-6974. Please direct all correspondence to the “attention of the desk officer for HRSA.” Dated: September 30, 2008. Alexandra Huttinger, Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.


[FR Doc. E8-23914 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002/SEC

RULE 13A-14(B)



Paul R. Hays and Keith A. Butler hereby certify that:



|1. |  | They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Synbiotics Corporation.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The Form 10-K report of Synbiotics Corporation that this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K report of Synbiotics Corporation that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Synbiotics Corporation.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
March 22, 2005



/s/    PAUL R. HAYSPaul R. Hays/s/    KEITH A. BUTLERKeith A. Butler
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSBof United Wisconsin Grain Producers, LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, J. F. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. F. Robertson               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | J. F. Robertson                   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer           |
|   | Dated:   March 17, 2005 |

 

----