alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rockefeller Group, Inc., Appellant, v Edwards & Hjorth et al., Respondents, and Rockefeller Center Management Corporation, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.), entered on May 3, 1989, which was resettled and modified on or about November 2,1989, and judgment of said court entered thereon on December 6, 1989, which, *inter alia,*granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the first amended counterclaim as against plaintiff Rockefeller Group, Inc. and additional defendant on the counterclaim Rockefeller Center Management Corporation in the amount of $112,336.82, is unanimously modified on the law, the facts and the exercise of discretion only to the extent of holding in abeyance the entry of summary judgment pending the determination of the remaining claims pursuant to CPLR 3212 (e) (2), and otherwise affirmed, without costs of disbursements.

Contrary to appellants’ assertion, their receipt and retention of defendants’ invoices, seeking payment for services rendered in preparing certain structural engineering documents relating to Rockefeller Center, without objection within a reasonable time, gave rise to an actionable account stated, thereby entitling the defendants to summary judgment in their favor *(Interman Indus. Prods, v R. S. M. Electron Power,*37 NY2d 151; *Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Neuman,*93 AD2d 745; *Fink, Weinberger, Fredman, Berman & Lowell v Petrides,*80 AD2d 781, *appeal dismissed*53 NY2d 1028). In that regard, the record herein reveals that appellants did not contest the accuracy of the invoices in question or the quality of defendants’ engineering work, but rather merely withheld payment based upon an unrelated dispute between the parties concerning ownership of the underlying engineering documents. Accordingly, the IAS court appropriately granted summary judgment in defendants’ favor based upon an account stated. However, the entry of judgment should be held in abeyance pending resolution of the remaining claims involved herein (CPLR 3212 [e] [2]). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of operations and
consolidated statement of cash flows included in the Company's Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,932
<SECURITIES>                                    10,166
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                       564
<INVENTORY>                                        461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,695
<PP&E>                                           7,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,438
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,530
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,438
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,665
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (560)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                       557
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       650
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 872 

Recognizing the ongoing work of The United States Sweet Potato Council 

and expressing support for designation of a ‘‘Sweet Potato Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2007 

Mr. WICKER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the ongoing work of The United States Sweet 

Potato Council and expressing support for designation 

of a ‘‘Sweet Potato Month’’. 

Whereas proper diet and nutrition are important factors in 

preventing diseases; 

Whereas evidence indicates that eating fruits and vegetables, 

including sweet potatoes, daily as part of a healthy diet 

will improve health and protect against diseases such as 

heart disease, cancer, stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity; 

Whereas sweet potatoes contain high quality protein and high 

levels of the phytonutrient, beta carotene; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 872 IH 

Whereas sweet potatoes also contain high fiber, folate, Potassium, Vitamin A, Vitamin B6, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, 

and Vitamin K; 

Whereas United States sweet potato farms yielded more than 

1,600,000,000 pounds of sweet potatoes in 2006; 

Whereas sweet potato production represents an important 

sector of the agriculture industry; 

Whereas the sweet potato industry contributes approximately 

$300,000,000 to the United States economy and employs 

thousands of people; 

Whereas sweet potatoes are grown in 36 states, are purchased and consumed in all 50 states, and are exported, 

in fresh or processed from, to many countries, including 

Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Greece, 

Honduras, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Netherlands, New 

Zealand, Singapore, Spain, and the United Kingdom; and 

Whereas The United States Sweet Potato Council has been 

the only National organization advocating for increased 

consumption of sweet potatoes: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the work of The United States 

3 Sweet Potato Council; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of a ‘‘Sweet Potato 

5 Month’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### CHAUFFEUR’S CLUB v. BEVERAGE DEPT. (two cases).

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Incentra Solutions, Inc.
      (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas P. Sweeney
      III, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Thomas P. Sweeney IIIThomas
                P. Sweeney IIIChief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1



GASTAR EXPLORATION LTD.

Subsidiary List  December 31, 2006



100%
Subsidiaries owned of Gastar Exploration Ltd. (Alberta, Canada)

Gastar Exploration USA, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration New South Wales, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration Victoria, Inc. (Michigan)

Gastar Exploration Texas LP (Delaware) (1)(2)

| | 
| | 

| | (1) | Gastar Exploration Texas LLC (Delaware), General Partner (1%)
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Gastar Exploration Texas, Inc. (Michigan), Limited Partner (99%)
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
March 31, 2000

Mr. H. E. "Skipper" Igoe
Shakespeare Partners
33 Frenchmans Key
Williamsburg, VA 23185

Envirometrics, Inc.
9229 University Boulevard
Charleston, SC  29401

     Re: 49,919 Shares of Series C Preferred Stock of  Envirometrics,  Inc. (the
"Company") Held By Shakespeare Partners.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to our Agreement of June 30, 1998, (the  "Agreement,"  Paragraphs 10-24
of which are fully incorporated  herein by reference and ratified and reaffirmed
in their  entirety by the  undersigned),  we hereby  notify you of our intent to
convert the  above-referenced  shares of Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Stock")
to  Envirometrics  Common Stock (the  "Common  Stock") at a ratio of 5 shares of
Common Stock for one share of Preferred Stock.  Kindly effect this conversion on
the tenth day  following  your receipt of this notice or as soon  thereafter  as
practicable.

We are enclosing  herewith any Certificate(s) we hold representing the Preferred
Stock. If you are holding any  Certificate(s)  representing the Preferred Stock,
you are hereby  instructed  to cancel same upon the issuance of the Common Stock
to us.

With regard to any dividends which have accrued on the entire  Preferred  Stock,
you are hereby  instructed  to issue Common Stock to us in lieu of such accruals
at a price of $0.40 per share. We understand  that no fractional  shares will be
issued, and shares will be rounded off to the nearest whole number.

We represent  that: (a) we have  familiarized  ourselves with the affairs of the
Company,  and we are  aware of the  Agreement  for the  Exchange  of Stock  (the
"Catapult  Agreement")  between  the  Company and The  Catapult  Group,  Inc. of
Atlanta,  GA; (b) we have  received and  reviewed a copy of the  Catapult  press
release dated March 13, 2000 which refers to the Catapult Agreement;  and (c) we
are aware that the Company  intends to effect a split of the Common  Stock prior
to the closing of the  Catapult  Agreement at a ratio of one new share of Common
Stock being issued for every ten shares then outstanding.


Sincerely yours,
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50396 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus GUILLERMO VILLALBA, also known as Guillermo Villalva, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-93-CR-294-1
- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Guillermo Villalba argues that the district court erred in determining that the Government did not have the burden of proving that his base offense level should be adjusted upward for his leadership role in the conspiracy. Villalba is correct that the Government had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his conduct warranted an upward adjustment. However, after reviewing the presentence report (PSR), Villalba's objections, and theNo. 95-50396 -2- transcript of the sentencing hearing, we affirm the district court's decision to make the upward adjustment based on the reliable and unrebutted evidence contained in the PSR that reflected that Villalba had a leadership role in the conspiracy. See United States v. Ayala , 47 F.3d 688, 689-90 (5th Cir. 1995) AFFIRMED.
Case 1:11-cv-02396-WJM-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02396-WJM-CBS Document 3 Filed 09/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

As
an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Archie M. Brown, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

This
certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officer serving
the Company and its many constituencies.

This
certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for any purpose
other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date:
March 10, 2011

/s/
Archie M. Brown, Jr.
[Signature]

President &
Chief Executive Officer
[Title]

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:11-cv-02407-MSK-KLM Document 20 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      60,028,000
<SECURITIES>                                48,249,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,431,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,083,000
<INVENTORY>                                 61,669,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           210,149,000
<PP&E>                                      88,797,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              52,411,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             246,535,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       78,077,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       249,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 162,309,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               246,535,000
<SALES>                                    484,011,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           484,011,000
<CGS>                                      360,623,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              363,458,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,299,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,678,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,621,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,621,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Incentra Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas P.
Sweeney III, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2006                 By: /s/ Thomas P. Sweeney III
                                            -------------------------
                                             Thomas P. Sweeney III
                                             Chief Executive Officer

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02497-MSK-KMT

SARA MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, LLC;

MACEY, ALEMAN, HYSLIP & SEARNS; and

JEFFREY HYSLIP,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-02497-MSK-KMT Document 5 Filed 09/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 28th day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02497-MSK-KMT Document 5 Filed 09/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00418-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

REUBEN JAMES SANTISTEVAN,

Defendant.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#15) on January 25, 2012, by Defendant. The Court construes this Notice as a motion to change

his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for April 2, 2012, at 3:30 p.m. and a Sentencing

hearing is set for June 25, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the United States District Court

for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for February 10, 2012, and the February

Case 1:11-cr-00418-MSK Document 16 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
13, 2012, trial date are VACATED.

Dated this 2nd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00418-MSK Document 16 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 for May Limited  Partnership 1984-3 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         74
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  65
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   511
<SALES>                                        248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            152
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   152
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
# Ifcl3-lf ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA"# 14-14-00054-CR OFFENSE: DWI 

### STYLE: The State ofTexas v Brian Wei COUNTY: Harris 

### COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No. 2 

### DATE: November6, 2014 Publish: Yes TC CASE #:1571823

IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### STYLE: The State ofTexas v Brian CCA# Wei 

### CCA Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: 

# Sf^5 Petition CCA IS: 

# Jb&'l* FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN ( 

# DATE: t&hffotS PC: 

# JUDGE: /£i CUASAs*-— PUBLISH: DNP:
MOTION FOR FOR REHEAF JUDGE: MNGINCCAIS: ELECTRONICRECORD
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 9, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.127 Issuers of Asset-Backed Securities ABSs** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|