alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB

THE WELLINGER FAMILY TRUST 1998;

JULIE WELLINGER, trustee, and

JULIE WELLINGER, individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance

company,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Pursuant to the Stipulation [Doc. # 33] of the parties,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s

Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [Doc. # 31] is GRANTED, and the defendant shall

designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before June 27, 2012.

DATED: June 13, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB Document 35 Filed 06/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.10(c)

June 25, 2004

Mr. Marc Particelli
President and CEO
Modem Media, Inc.
230 East Avenue
Norwalk, CT 06855

Re: Commission Deferral and Settlement of Year to Date Fees

Dear Marc:

     Reference is made to (a) that certain Amended and Restated Reseller
Agreement by and between CentrPort, Inc. ("CentrPort") and Modem Media, Inc.
("Modem"), dated March 13, 2003 (the "Reseller Agreement") and (b) that certain
letter agreement by and between CentrPort and Modem dated February 22, 2002
concerning CentrPort's relationship with General Motors Corp. through
Mediaworks, Inc. and certain payments to be made to Modem in connection
therewith (the "GM Letter").

     This letter confirms that Modem Media has agreed to defer all payments to
be owed to Modem under the GM Letter for Revenue (as such term is defined in the
GM Letter) recognized by CentrPort for the period of July 1, 2004 to and
including December 31, 2004) in connection with or arising out of the Project
(as such term is defined in the GM Letter). Such deferral shall take effect on
July 1, 2004 and shall continue until the earlier to occur of (a) the date,
after the date of this letter, on which CentrPort consummates the issuance of
securities, debt or instruments convertible to securities by CentrPort in one or
several transactions for an aggregate cash consideration of at least five
million dollars ($5,000,000.00), (b) the closing of a sale, transfer or merger
of CentrPort or substantially all of its assets, or (c) May 1, 2005, at which
time, in either case, all such deferred payments accrued through such date shall
be due and immediately payable in full. In addition and as a precondition to
CentrPort's and Modem's agreement to the deferred payment arrangement set forth
above, by June 30, 2004 by a mutual exchange of checks, (x) CentrPort shall pay
to Modem all amounts owed to Modem pursuant to the GM Letter for Revenue
recognized by CentrPort from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004 in connection
with or arising our of the Project, and (y) Modem shall pay to CentrPort all
amounts owed to CentrPort under the Reseller Agreement and related service level
agreements or arrangements in connection with the Products (as such term is
defined in the Reseller Agreement) provided by CentrPort to Delta Airlines and
its affiliates from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004. In furtherance of the
foregoing, CentrPort and Modem agree that they will exchange checks by June 30,
2004 in the amount of $271,135.55 from CentrPort to Modem and 328,986 from Modem
to CentrPort.

     Except as amended hereby, all other terms of the GM Letter and the Reseller
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     If the foregoing properly sets forth your understanding, please so indicate
your agreement by signing below, and returning a signed copy to CentrPort.

Sincerely,


/s/ Bill Zierolf
----------------------------------------
Bill Zierolf
President and CEO


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

MODEM MEDIA, INC.


By: /s/ Marc Particelli
    ------------------------------------
    Marc Particelli, President and CEO
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the CardioDynamics International
Corporation (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve P. Loomis, Vice President Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2005



/s/    STEVE P.
LOOMISSteve P. LoomisVice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements of the Company for the nine-month  period ended  September
30,  1999 and  should  be read in  conjunction  with,  and is  qualified  in its
entirety by, such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0001025362
<NAME>              GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                   USD

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                 1,836,615
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             29,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,944,112 <F1>
<PP&E>                                28,107,911 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                           285,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        30,052,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    131,233
<BONDS>                                  759,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                              34,168,458
<OTHER-SE>                            (5,007,240)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          30,052,023
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          80,210 <F4>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         568,846 <F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (488,636)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>
         Includes prepaid expenses and other current assets of $78,229.
<F2>
         Consists  of  properties  and  equipment,   net  of   depreciation   of
         $1,032,362;  mineral  properties of  $26,067,347;  and other  long-term
         assets of $1,008,202.
<F3>
         Consists of $5,007,240 of deficit  accumulated  during the  development
         stage.
<F4>
         Consists of interest income of $80,210.
<F5>
         Consists of general and  administrative  expenses of $559,423 and other
         expenses of $9,423.

</FN>


</TABLE>
1

Nicole Quintana

From: Haddock Jason R <Jason.Haddock@ci.irs.gov>

Sent: March 27, 2012 3:01 PM

To: Nicole Quintana

Cc: Lair Ted K

Subject: Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture

Attachments: Notice of Complaint.zip

Hello Ms. Quintana,

Please see attached documents regarding the real property at 927 Cole Street:

   

Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture Against Real Property

Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem

Per your conversation with Special Agent Ted Lair, you agreed to accept these documents on behalf of your client

George Magnani, as notice of the government’s interest in this property.  Please reply via email and acknowledge your

receipt of these documents.

Please contact me at the phone number below if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Jason Haddock

Asset Forfeiture Specialist‐ ASRC Primus

IRS Criminal Investigation  

Denver Field Office

1999 Broadway, 27th Floor

Denver, CO 80202

(303) 603‐4939 desk

(303) 912‐7482 cell

(303) 383‐5074 fax

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-7 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

R.M.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-395

February 23, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kim Brennan, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Caroline Joan S. Picart, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#221) on February 19, 2013, by Defendant Alois Craig Weingart. The Court construes this

Notice as a motion to change his/her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’

plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for April 8, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. and a Sentencing

hearing is set for July 8, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. in the United States District Court

for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,

Case 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 223 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for March 13, 2013, and the March 18,

2013, trial date are VACATED.

DATED this 21st day of February, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 223 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: June 17, 2013

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02550-RPM

 (Coordinated with cases 11-cv-02584-RPM, 11-cv-02817, 11-cv-02819-RPM, 

 12-cv-01724, 12-cv-01069 and 12-cv-0876-RPM) 

SIAMAK AMIRINOOR, William W. Muhr

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Scott A. Risner

Defendant.

And

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02584-RPM

KEVIN STRINGER, Kimberly P. Everette

RYAN O’NEILL,

JOAQUIN MARTINEZ,

CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, and

WILLIAM LEGER III, individually and

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Scott A. Risner

 Defendant. 

 

AMENDED COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motions

2:32 p.m. Court in session.

Plaintiff Mr. Amirinoor

Court’s preliminary remarks.

Statements by Mr. Muhr regarding status of the case and explanation for motion for withdrawal. 

Mr. Muhr answers questions asked by the Court.

Case 1:11-cv-02584-RPM Document 73 Filed 06/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

June 17, 2013

11-cv-02550-RPM

11-cv-02584-RPM

Ms. Everette answers questions asked by the Court regarding representation.

Mr. Risner answers questions asked by the Court regarding status of related cases filed in this district.

Mr. O’Neil states he is attempting to ascertain counsel with class action experience.

Mr. Muhr answers questions regarding status of using plaintiff O’Neall as a test case.

Statements by plaintiff Mr. Amirinoor and answers questions asked by the Court.

Mr. Amirinoor states he agrees to the motion withdraw of Mr. Muhr.

ORDERED: Attorney William Muhr’s Motion to Withdraw [35] in 11-cv-02550-RPM, is

granted. Mr. Muhr and his law firm have no further representation responsibility.

Mr. Amirinoor shall retrieve a copy of his file at Mr. Muhr’s office.

Mr. Muhr shall obtain a copy from Mr. Rector of Mr. Amirinoor’s file and turn it

over directly to plaintiff Amirinoor.

Mr. Amirinoor shall find new counsel and advise the Court by the filing of an entry

of appearance.

Discussion between Court and Mr. Risner regarding the case concerning plaintiff O’Neill.

Further statements by Ms. Everette.

ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification [51], is denied.

Motion to Stay Proceedings [71] in 11-cv-02584-RPM, is granted with respect to all

related cases with the exception of plaintiff O’Neill.

Defendant in 11-cv-02584-RPM shall file its motion for summary judgment with

respect to plaintiff O’Neill by July 17, 2013 and plaintiff’s response due in

accordance with the rules.

3:02 p.m. Court in recess. 

Hearing concluded. Total time: 30 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02584-RPM Document 73 Filed 06/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Louis H. HOLDER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 76-3227

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1977.

Rehearing Denied March 1,1977.

Louis H. Holder, pro se.

Ronald T. Knight, U. S. Atty., Richard E. Nettum, John D. Carey, Asst. U. S. Attys., Macon, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5*Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

*617PER CURIAM:

Holder was originally sentenced to the maximum 5-year term of imprisonment provided for the offense of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. 18 U.S.C. § 2312. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3651, 4*/2 years of the sentence were suspended, and Holder was ordered to serve 6 months; he was placed on probation for a period of 5 years, commencing with his release from imprisonment. One year and 8 months after Holder was released from prison his probation was revoked under 18 U.S.C. § 3653, and the court vacated the suspended sentence and imposed a sentence to be served of 4% years.

Holder attacks the revocation of his probation, contending that it was improper because the district court considered his conviction for a drunk driving offense at which Holder contends he did not have counsel. He further contends that he should have been given credit on the sentence imposed for the time he spent on probation. These contentions are without merit. *United States v. Evers,*534 F.2d 1186 (5th Cir. 1976). Holder’s contention that the court improperly considered in sentencing some or all of 27 prior convictions which appeared on his rap sheet and which Holder asserts were invalid for various reasons is without merit. The record is clear that the district court based the decision to impose the entirety of the sentence originally suspended upon Holder’s failure to keep the terms of his present probation as then promised. *Compare Campbell v. United States,*538 F.2d 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1976), with *United States v. Evers,*534 F.2d 1186 (5th Cir. 1976).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0540

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

WILLIAM E. HAWKES,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant William E. Hawkes appeals from the Judgment of the Fourth Judicial 

District Court, Missoula County, in its Cause No. DC-32-2019-0000033-IN. Hawkes

argues the District Court erred by failing to give him credit for two days served. 

The State has filed a Notice of Concession that this matter should be remanded to 

the District Court for the purpose of entering an amended sentence and judgment. Without 

agreeing with all of the arguments Hawkes has raised, the State agrees that in this case the 

District Court erred in failing to give Hawkes credit for two days served. 

Based on Hawke’s opening brief and the State’s concession, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Fourth Judicial 

District Court, Missoula County, with instructions for the District Court to amend its 

Judgment to provide Hawkes credit with two days served.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of this appeal is DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that REMITTITUR shall issue IMMEDIATELY 

UPON REMAND.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

presiding judge Honorable Leslie Halligan.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 10 2024

01/10/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0540
#### Ben LENTZ v. STATE.

8 Div. 190.

Court ol Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

BBICKEN, Presiding- Judge.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Newport
News Shipbuilding Inc. Balance Sheet as of September 19, 1999, and the related
Statement of Earnings for the nine months ended September 19, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-19-1999
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         54
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   589
<PP&E>                                           1,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                     885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              444
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,509
<SALES>                                          1,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,325
<CGS>                                            1,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    126
<INCOME-TAX>                                        53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 73
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        73
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DCB Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Ustaszewski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John A. Ustaszewski

John A. Ustaszewski
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002



                                                                             24.
#### Charlie WILLIAMS v. STATE.

8 Div. 97.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32

Chief Executive and Financial Officer  Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the  undersigned  Chief Executive and Financial
Officer of Mortgage Assistance Center Corporation,  (the "Company"),  during the
period covered by this report,  herby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Annual  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended March 31,
2006 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed  original of this  written
statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to the  registrant and will
be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


Dated: May 19, 2006                                        /s/ Dale Hensel
                                                          ----------------------
                                                          Dale Hensel
                                                          CEO

                                                           /s/ Dale Hensel
                                                          ----------------------
                                                          Dale Hensel
                                                          CFO