alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:  September 19, 2003



/s/ Jack W. OehlkeJack W. OehlkePresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-BNB

ANDRE L. GARLINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/CCA,

WARDEN VANCE EVERETTE, KCCC/CCA, and

UM TAMERA COOPER, KCCC/CCA,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Andre L. Garlington, is in the custody of the Colorado Department of

Corrections and currently is incarcerated at the Kit Carson Correctional Center. Mr.

Garlington initiated this action by submitting to the Court a pro se Prisoner Complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28

U.S.C. § 1915 on September 29, 2011. On October 12, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boyd

N. Boland granted Mr. Garlington leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The October 12 Order requires Mr. Garlington to pay the full amount of the

$350.00 filing fee in installments and directs him to pay an initial partial filing fee of

$3.00 within thirty days or to show cause why he has no assets and no means to pay

the initial fee by filing a current certified copy of his trust fund account statement. The

Order warns Mr. Garlington that if he fails to have the initial partial filing fee sent to the

Clerk of the Court by the designated deadline or to show cause why he has no assets 

Case 1:11-cv-02555-LTB Document 5 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
and no means by which to pay the initial fee the Complaint would be dismissed without

further notice.

Mr. Garlington has not communicated with the Court since September 29, 2011.

Therefore, Mr. Garlington has failed either to pay the initial partial filing fee within the

time allowed as designated in the October 12 Order, or in the alternative to show cause

why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. Accordingly, it

is

 ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Mr.

Garlington’s failure either to pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.00 or to show cause why

he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of November , 2011.

 BY THE COURT: 

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Senior Judge, United States District Court 

Case 1:11-cv-02555-LTB Document 5 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W.,

C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W.,

CHILDREN

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 392ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

S.W. filed a pro se notice of appeal in this parental rights termination case, stating that she 

is “appealing all hearings from the beginning of this cause til the present.” 

It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and 

interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

195 (Tex. 2001); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West 2015) (authorizing appeals 

from certain interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and 

claims. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. 

The district clerk has informed this court that no final judgment or other appealable order 

has been signed in the case. On June 24, 2015, this court sent a letter to S.W. notifying her that it 

appears there is no final judgment or order in the case. S.W. was warned that the appeal would be 

dismissed unless, on or before July 6, 2015, the information in the appeal was amended to show 

the jurisdiction of this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. The July 6, 2015 deadline has passed, and 

the information in this appeal has not been amended to show this court’s jurisdiction. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

Opinion delivered July 8, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)

 

1 Today we also dismissed an appeal by D.G.M., which was filed under this appellate cause number 

(12-15-00126-CV). D.G.M. and S.W. were the only parties attempting to appeal. Therefore, this appeal has been 

dismissed in its entirety.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 8, 2015

NO. 12-15-00126-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T. W., C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 392nd District Court 

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM 15-0010-392)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
|   **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Science, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Cowan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1      

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: */s/ Richard Cowan*Richard CowanChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerMarch 17, 2010

                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:   August 16, 2010
    /s/ John A. UstaszewskiJohn A. UstaszewskiTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer  35
(173 La. 459)

#### STATE v. HURST.

No. 31468.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 3, 1931.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., Robert S. Ellis, Jr., Dist. Atty., of Amite, and E¡. R. Schowalter, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Reid & Reid, of Hammond, for appellee.

LAND, J.

Defendant is indicted in separate indictments for the murder of Johnnie Hurst and of Marvin Allen on March 15, 1931, in the parish of St. Helena.

Defendant was tried and acquitted under the indictment charging him with the murder of Johnnie Hurst. Thereafter, having been incarcerated in the parish jail, without the benefit of bail, under the indictment charging him with the murder of Marvin Allen, defendant applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that the two homicides resulted from one continuous unlawful transaction, and that therefore only one indictment would lie under the provisions of article 218 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the state.

The writ bf habeas corpus was issued, and, after hearing had, the trial judge found that the facts stated by defendant in his application for the writ were well founded, and discharged defendant from custody on the authority of State v. White (La. Sup.) 136 So. 47, 48.

, From this judgment, the state has appealed. . .

The White Case specifically overruled the decisions of this court in the cases of State v. Jacques, 171 La. 994, 132 So. 657, and State v. Cormier, 171 La. 1035, 132 So. 779, upon which the state relies in the present case, in so far as in conflict herewith.

In the White Case, the constitutionality of article 218 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was sustained, in so far as it applied to “the inclusion in one indictment in separate counts of two murders, or other crimes of the same nature, when such crimes result from one continuous unlawful transaction, and are triable and punishable alike.”

The ruling made in the White Case was later reviewed in State v. Bell et al., 136 So. 97, and was upheld by this court. The jurisprudence on the subject of article 218 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must now be considered as definitely settled.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                       39,301,294
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,076,865
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             40,378,159
<PP&E>                       12,177,898
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               65,062,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,053,117
<BONDS>                       7,624,586
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                   56,370,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 65,062,906
<SALES>                       5,709,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              6,794,437
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,292,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                637,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              557,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>               3,240,011
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           3,240,011
<DISCONTINUED>               13,684,709
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                 16,924,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    111.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                    111.06




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



FOOTHILL INDEPENDENT BANCORP



Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2004



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Foothill Independent
Bancorp (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Annual Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated March 14, 2005



/s/ CAROL ANN GRAFCarol Ann GrafSenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23937]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA08-62-000]


California Independent System; Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

October 2, 2008.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on October 3, 2008, members of its staff will participate 
in a meeting to be conducted by the California Independent System 
Operator (CAISO) regarding the CAISO's transmission planning standards 
agreement. The information and documents for the meeting can be 
obtained from Judi Sanders, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f39980929d97968180b390929a809cdd909c9e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c061f0d0208091e1f2c0f0d051f03420f0301">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Sponsored by the CAISO, this meeting is open to all market 
participants, and staff's participation is part of the Commission's 
ongoing outreach efforts. This meeting may discuss matters at issue in 
the above captioned docket.
    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee9d8f8b8b8ac0888f9c9c8185869e8f97ae888b9c8dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e4d5f5b5b5a10585f4c4c5155564e5f477e585b4c5d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>; (916) 294-0233 or Maury Kruth at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eee2f6f1faade8f1f6f7ebc3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b666a7e79722560797e7f634b6d6e7968256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>, (916) 294-0275.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23937 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First National Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010, I,
M. Shane Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First National Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of First National Corporation.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ M. Shane Bell                                   
|Date: March 23, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.1

  ARRANGEMENT WITH MR. MICHAEL BERRY, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, REYNOLDS SERVICES
                                     GROUP

Mr. Michael Berry was recently hired to serve as Senior Vice President, Reynolds
Services Group and is an executive officer of the company. Pursuant to the terms
of his employment, Mr. Berry is entitled to receive an annual base salary of
$250,000 and is entitled to participate in the company's executive compensation
arrangements described in the company's Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on
December 30, 2003, including, without limitation, bonus programs and equity
compensation plans. In addition, Mr. Berry is entitled to a severance package
equal to one (1) times his annual base salary following his separation from the
company within the first twenty-four (24) months of his employment, as a result
of a material adverse change in his roles and responsibilities, a reduction in
his base compensation, or a job relocation more than 50 miles from Dayton, Ohio,
following a change in control of the company.

                                       24
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Shuffle Master, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linster W. Fox, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








January 13, 2011/s/ Linster W. FoxLinster W. FoxChief Financial Officer
## **EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Shuffle Master, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, asamended, for the year ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald W. Koslow,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, certify, pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), thatto the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 2, 2003                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
|                                                          |
| /s/ Gerald W. Koslow                                          |   |
| Gerald W. Koslow                                              |
| Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
#### A. Z. HINSON v. STATE (two cases).

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
1

 Respondent Rick Thaler is not required to file an Answer in this action. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02552-BNB

ALAN LEWIS,

Applicant,

v.

RICK THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD AND ANSWER

After preliminary consideration of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS ORDERED: 

(1) Within thirty days from the date of this order Respondent Attorney

General of the State of Colorado shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic

format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicant’s state court proceedings

in Morgan County District Court case number 00CR23, including all documents in the

state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but

excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to

the asserted claims;

 (2) Within thirty days from the date the state court record is provided to

the Court, Respondent Attorney General of the State of Colorado1

 shall file an Answer

Case 1:11-cv-02552-RBJ Document 16 Filed 12/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in

the United States District Courts; and

(3) Within thirty days of the filing of the answer Applicant may file a reply, if

he desires; and

(3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Order to the clerk

of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager,

State Court Administrator’s Office by United States mail, first class postage prepaid, at

the following addresses:

Clerk of the Court

Morgan County District Court

400 Warner Street

Fort Morgan, Colorado 80701;

Court Services Manager

State Court Administrator’s Office

101 W. Colfax, Suite 500

Denver, Colorado 80202

DATED December 28, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02552-RBJ Document 16 Filed 12/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2