alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1216

 To allow certain nationals of Mexico entering the State of New Mexico 
 on a temporary basis to travel up to 100 miles from the international 
   border between the State of New Mexico and Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2007

 Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow certain nationals of Mexico entering the State of New Mexico 
 on a temporary basis to travel up to 100 miles from the international 
   border between the State of New Mexico and Mexico, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Laser Visa Extension Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. TRAVEL PRIVILEGES FOR CERTAIN TEMPORARY VISITORS FROM MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
Secretary of Homeland Security shall permit a national of Mexico to 
travel up to 100 miles from the international border between Mexico and 
the State of New Mexico if such national--
            (1) possesses a valid machine-readable biometric border 
        crossing identification card issued by a consular officer of 
        the Department of State;
            (2) enters the State of New Mexico through a port of entry 
        where such card is processed using a machine reader;
            (3) has successfully completed any background check 
        required by the Secretary for such travel; and
            (4) is admitted into the United States as a nonimmigrant 
        under section 101(a)(15)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality 
        Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(B)).
    (b) Exception.--On a case-by-case basis, the Secretary of Homeland 
Security may limit the travel of a national of Mexico who meets the 
requirements of paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) to a 
distance of less than 100 miles from the international border between 
Mexico and the State of New Mexico if the Secretary determines that the 
national was previously admitted into the United States as a 
nonimmigrant and violated the terms and conditions of the national's 
nonimmigrant status.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58539-58540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, et al.; Notice of 
Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific 
Instruments

    This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related 
records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 2104, U.S. 
Department of Commerce,

[[Page 58540]]

14th and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no 
instruments of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments 
described below, for such purposes as each is intended to be used, that 
was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
    Docket Number: 08-040. Applicant: New Mexico Institute of Mining 
and Technology; Socorro, New Mexico 87801. Instrument: Unit Telescope. 
Manufacturer: Advanced Mechanical and Optical Systems SA (AMOS), 
Belgium. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 52644, September 10, 2008. 
Reasons: The instrument has the following features which are essential 
to the research. The instrument is able to be relocated, the functions 
of the instrument are able to be controlled and monitored over a 
network connection, and the instrument has an aperture greater than 
one-meter.
    Docket Number: 08-042. Applicant: University of Alabama at 
Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294. Instrument: FIE Vitrobot. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 
73 FR 52644, September 10, 2008. Reasons: The instrument has a 
controlled environmental chamber and the capability of fully automated 
operation. These features are required for the research.

    Dated: September 30, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-23583 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of World Heart
Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Morgan R. Brown, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation as of
September 30, 2010.




Dated:
      November 12, 2010
              /s/  Morgan
      R. BrownMorgan
      R. Brown, Executive Vice President
                and
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)




“This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Corporation under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Cheryl
        L.
        Dotson, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/
        Cheryl L. Dotson
 
 Cheryl
        L.
        Dotson
 CFO
 Dated:
        December 31,
        2007
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Calypso Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007                                           
|                                                            
|/S/    MICHAEL
ZUGAY                                        
|Michael Zugay Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
#### DAVIS AND MEIGS v. OKALOOSA COUNTY.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion
SPEM Ex 10.11 Black Diamond Cons Agree






CONSULTING AGREEMENT







This consulting agreement is made and entered into by and between, Speedemissions, Inc. (Company) and Black Diamond Advisers, LLC (Consultant) with respect to the following:




DUTIES:




The consultant will provide advice in connection with the development of the Company’s corporate strategy including financing. The consultant shall assist the Company in forming strategic partnerships and initiatives, which will help the company’s growth. The consultant will assist the Company in corporate structure, corporate communications, developing press releases and positioning the Company among investors.




TERM:




The Consultant’s engagement shall begin on January 1, 2004 with an initial term of 6 months.




COMPENSATION:




The Consultant shall be entitled to a 5% cash fee of the capital raised directly through the efforts of the Consultant and 100,000 shares of Speedemissions’ stock with 50,000 shares of Stock registered in the next registration statement and 50, 000 shares of S-8 stock.




EXPENSES:




The Consultant will pay his own daily expenses but the Company will reimburse the Consultant for reasonable travel and business expenses in the performance of his duties.

 




AGREED and ACCEPTED BY:








	 
	





	
Rich Parlontieri, President

	
Speedemissions, Inc.

	 
	
 

	





	
Paul Bornstein

	
Black Diamond Advisers, LLC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02527-DME-KMT

COLORADO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,

v.

BROCK USA, LLC, 

Defendant and Counter Claimant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER COMES BEFORE the Court on Defendant’s motion to stay 

briefing on Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. (Doc. 31.) Plaintiff 

opposes the stay. Nevertheless, the Court will grant the motion and stay briefing on the 

partial summary judgment motion. Defendant may file an expanded summary judgment 

motion by the Dispositive Motion Deadline established in the Scheduling Order, July 16, 

2012. (Doc. 18 at 13-14.) 

DONE AND SIGNED this 19th day of January , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/ David M. Ebel

U. S. Circuit Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02527-DME-KMT Document 32 Filed 01/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie Butler, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 670]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), rendered April 26, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the juiy’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]).

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). The court permitted inquiry only into a portion of defendant’s extensive criminal record, and the theft-related convictions about which the court permitted inquiry were highly probative of defendant’s credibility.

Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the procedure under *500which he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329 [2001], *cert denied*534 US 899 [2001]). Defendant’s mandatory sentence was based entirely on his prior convictions *(see Almendarez-Torres v United States,*523 US 224 [1998]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT**

The Board of Directors CardioDynamics International Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 14, 2003 included the related financialstatement schedule as of November 30, 2002 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2002, included in the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of theCompany’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos. 333-40969,333-38920, 333-38922 and 333-70902 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-31275, 333-65331, 333-69669, 333-69663, 333-69659, 333-86475, 333-88311, 333-88307, 333-88309, 333-31702, 333-44226, 333-66396, 333-69456, 333-69458 and 333-70916 on Form S-3 ofCardioDynamics International Corporation of our report dated January 14, 2003, relating to the balance sheets of CardioDynamics International Corporation as of November 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2002, and the financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the November 30, 2002, Annual Report on Form 10-K of CardioDynamics InternationalCorporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

San Diego, California February 26, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TAYLOR
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE 48 DAY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-12-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          82,249
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,086
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,425
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    384,777
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          75,452
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            75,716
<LOANS>                                      1,210,588
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,846,887
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,430,578
<SHORT-TERM>                                   172,911
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             17,928
<LONG-TERM>                                     91,881
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,250
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,846,887
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,906
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,654
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   244
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,804
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,665
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,643
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,161
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      484
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.28
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,261
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,310
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,607
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      755
<RECOVERIES>                                       193
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,529
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,529
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Linda J. Wikso, Respondent, v Ronald E. Wikso, Appellant.

Order unanimously aifirmed with costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5241 to correct or vacate an income execution for support enforcement on the ground of a mistake of fact, respondent contends that the amount of the arrears specified in the income execution is in error. He contends that he owes no money because the separation agreement which required him to pay maintenance was abrogated by the reconciliation of the parties. Respondent claims that the trial court erred when it summarily denied his application without a hearing.

Respondent’s claim is without merit. The Legislature did not intend that a mistake of fact include contentions involving legal questions *(see, Mirabella v Mirabella,*131 Misc 2d 655). The issue of arrears is to be resolved on the basis of what the order of support directs and whether there has been compliance *(see, Caldera v Caldera,*142 Misc 2d 434; Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, 1990 Pocket Part, CPLR 5241, at 123). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Leis, III, J.—maintenance and child support.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
204 La. 109

#### STATE v. Lennie SAVOY.

No. 36749.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1943.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1943.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., Seth Lewis, Dist. Atty., of Opelousas, R. H. Lee, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

S. Allen Bordelon, of Marksville, and Lessley P. Gardiner, of Opelousas, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Justice.

For the reasons assigned in 14 So.2d 924, which was today decided, the judgment appealed from is reversed and set aside, defendant’s demurrer is now overruled, and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.

HIGGINS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons. See 14 So.2d 925.

FOURNET, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

PONDER, J. dissents.

FOURNET, Justice

(dissenting).

The issues involved in this case are the same as those involved in the case of State of Louisiana v. Lennie Savey, 14 So.2d 924, this day handed down, and, for the reasons therein assigned, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case.
#### Homer BOWERS and Gillis Bowers v. STATE.

4 Div. 108.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 30, 1935.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

RICE, Judge.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Timothy J. Benson, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended August 4, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 17, 2007                            
|                                                     
|/s/ Timothy J. Benson                                
|Timothy J. Benson                                    
|Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:11-cv-02511-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02511-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02511-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02511-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
Scherne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of New
Generation Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of New Generation Holdings, Inc.




/s/
      Robert
  ScherneRobert
      Scherne
                Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
                New
      Generation Holdings, Inc.


August
14, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 17, 2007



/s/ Jack W. OehlkeJack W. OehlkePresident and Chief Executive Officer