alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests, USDA Forest Service. 

# ACTION:

Notice of New Fee Site. 

# SUMMARY:

The Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests is planning to charge a $5 per site per night fee for overnight camping at Hickey Gap Campground. The fees listed are only proposed and will be determined upon further analysis and public comment. This campground has five campsites and has been available for camping use prior to this date. Campgrounds on the Chattahoochee-Oconee  National Forests have shown that people appreciate and enjoy the availability of outdoor camping facilities. Funds from the campground will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of Hickey Gap Campground. 

# DATES:

Hickey Gap Campground will start charging fees in March, 2009. 

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Supervisor, Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests, 1755  Cleveland Highway, Gainesville, GA 30501. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen McKenzie, Public Affairs Officer, 770-297-3061. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. This new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource  Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and implementation.                 

The Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests currently has thirty-five other campgrounds. These campgrounds have a total of 675 campsites; 23 campgrounds are operated by concessionaires. A business analysis of Hickey Gap Campground has shown that people desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests. A market analysis indicates that the $5 per site per night fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. 

Dated: October 6, 2008. 

Paul L. Bradley, 

Acting Forest Supervisor,  Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests.

 [FR Doc. E8-24131 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### MOTOR FINANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR, v. THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND VINCENT J. MURPHY, AS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND FINANCE, AND AS RECEIVER OF TAXES OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANTS.

Argued October 10, 1947

Decided October 23, 1947.

Before Justices Forges, Colie and Eastwood.

For the prosecutor, *Emerson, Emory & Danzig (Charles Danzig*and *George E. Lasky,*of counsel).

For the defendants, *Thomas L. Parsonnet (Vincent J. Casóle,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

Prosecutor is engaged in the business of dealing in and negotiating promissory notes and making and dealing in secured and unsecured loans, and it is stipulated that it comes within the provisions of chapter 174, laws of 1946, *R. S.*54:10B — 1, *et seq.,*legislatively denominated the “Financial Business Tax Law (1946).” Section 3 of the act imposes an annual excise tax upon all financial businesses of three-fourths of one per centum upon its net worth and expressly provides that “Such tax shall also be in lieu of any state franchise tax or of any state or local taxation of, upon or measured by personal property entering into the determination of net worth.” Section 2 (c), so far as pertinent, defines “net worth” as:

> *263“(1) in -the ease of a corporation — the aggregate of the values disclosed by the books of the corporation for (1) issued and outstanding capital stock, (2) paid-in or capital surplus, (3) earned surplus and undivided profits, (4) surplus reserves which can reasonably be expected to accrue to holders or owners of equitable shares, excluding reasonable valuation reserves and (5) the amount of all indebtedness owing directly or indirectly to holders of ton per centum (10%) or more of the aggregate outstanding shares of the taxpayer’s capital stock of all classes, as of the close of a tax year.”

Depositions were taken by rule of the court which disclosed that prosecutor in the return filed by it in accordance with section 15 of the statute included, in determining its net worth, the value of its tangible personal property owned as of October, 1946. The City of Newark assessed the tangible personal property owned by the prosecutor on the assessing date at $10,000 and levied a tax thereon of $556. The city attempts to justify this, act under the purported authority of *R. S.*54:4-1 and contends “that the tangible personal property in question is neither expressly exempted or expressly excluded from taxation” under *R. S.*54:4-1.

The fact is, and we so find, that the value of the tangible personal property of Motor Finance Corporation is included in its “net worth” as shown on the return filed by it and therefore the municipality had no legal justification for levying the tax complained of. Any other view would render meaningless the provision in section 3 that “such tax shall also be in lieu of any * * * local taxation of, upon or measured by personal property entering into the determination of net worth.”

The assessment under review’' is set aside, with costs to the prosecutor.
#### Volney BROOKER, Petitioner, v. Nathan MAYO, as Prison Custodian of the State of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 11, 1955.

*855Volney Brooker, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

TERRELL, Justice.

Petitioner was tried and convicted on an information wherein the first count charged that he (petitioner) did unlawfully withhold support from his two minor children from August 15, 1952, to November 25, 1953. In the second count it was charged that petitioner did unlawfully desert his two minor children from August 15, 1953, to November 25, 1953. It accordingly appears from the record that the desertion took place one year after withholding support. He was sentenced to one year in the penitentiary on each count. He challenges the judgment so imposed by habeas corpus.

The facts are not clear but the rule is that petitioner must overcome the prima facie correctness of his imprisonment. Coleman v. State, ex rel. Race, 118 Fla. 201, 159 So. 504; State ex rel. Williams v. Coleman, 131 Fla. 872, 180 So. 360. Sufficiency of the evidence will not be tested by habeas corpus. White v. Penton, 92 Fla. 837, 110 So. 533. It appears that petitioner stands convicted of two different crimes separated by one year in time. This excludes him from the rule in Deal v. Mayo, Fla., 76 So. 2d 275, where the imposition of two one-year sentences arising from the same unlawful act was condemned.

It is accordingly our judgment that petitioner should be and he is hereby remanded to the custody of respondent

It is so ordered.

MATHEWS, C. J., and SEBRING and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

Series 2007-1, Class A Notes; Series 2007-1, Class B Notes

 

I, Deepak Mangla, Director and City Manager of HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private Limited (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2006 amending and restating in full the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 12, 2001 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC  Funding (USA) Inc. V, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 12th day of March 2010.

|   | . |
|--------|---|

 

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (India) Private

  Limited

 

 

|   | By: | /s/ Deepak Mangla |
|--------|-----|-------------------|

|   | Name: | Deepak Mangla |
|--------|-------|---------------|

|   | Title: | Director and City Manager |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership  1984-3 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000765946
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         308
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               509
<PP&E>                                         7,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   538
<SALES>                                        227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                187
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            187
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  18.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  18.64
        


</TABLE>
812 A.2d 1105

#### DANIEL ORENBERG AND JOHN SCHELLER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MARTHA GREENBLATT AND JOSEPH DEGENNARO, DEFENDANTS, AND MARTIN GREENBLATT, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ALLEN COHEN, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

November 6, 2002.

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to *Rule*2:2 — 1(a)(1), and the Court having deter*72mined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the *Rule*or applicable caselaw;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gary F. Livesay, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Obie Media Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  July 15, 2004

                                                       By: /s/ Gary F. Livesay
                                                       Vice President
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
-1- 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW 

TAMMY ROBERTS, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated persons, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE KESSLER ENTERPRISE, INC., a Georgia corporation; and 

RCK BEAVER CREEK LODGE, INC., a Colorado corporation, 

Defendants. 

ORDER APPROVING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT 

This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion for an order approving 

their collective action settlement. Having reviewed the motion, the record, and the 

details of the Settlement Agreement, the Court concludes that the Settlement Agreement 

reflects a reasonable compromise over the issues that are actually in dispute in this case. 

Furthermore, the Settlement Agreement was reached in an adversarial context and 

arrived at a fair disposition of the claims and costs in dispute. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Approve Collective Action Settlement [ECF 

Doc. No. 59], filed April 4, 2013, is GRANTED and the proposed Settlement Agreement is 

approved. It is further 

Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 60 Filed 04/10/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2- 

ORDERED that the Court will maintain jurisdiction over this action until the terms of 

the Settlement Agreement are fully executed. It is further 

ORDERED that, pursuant to the Court's authority under D.C. Colo. LCivR 41.2, 

this case shall be administratively closed during the pendency of the execution period of 

the Settlement Agreement. On or before September 1, 2013, the case may be reopened 

by motion of any party showing good cause. If, on or before September 1, 2013, no 

party files a motion to reopen the case or a motion to extend that deadline, the case shall 

be dismissed. 

Dated: April 10, 2013 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL, 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 60 Filed 04/10/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Salomon Smith Barney Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel                                    David J. Vogel Citigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

March 29,2006                                        Date

----
**EXHIBIT 10.43**

 

**ELEVENTH AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.**

**PROFIT SHARING AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN**

 

*(Effective as of October 1, 1998)*

 

WHEREAS, Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Taylor Capital Group, Inc. Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Effective as of October 1, 1998) (the “Plan”); and

 

WHEREAS, it is now considered desirable to further amend thePlan; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the power reserved to theCompany by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, and in exercise of the authority delegated to the Committee established pursuant to Section 18 of the plan (the “Committee”) by subsection 17.1 of the Plan, effective as of March 27, 2005, bysubstituting “$1,000” for “$5,000” where the latter appears in subsection 11.1 and subparagraph 11.4(c) of the Plan. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned duly authorized member of the Committee has caused the foregoing amendment to be executed this 16th day of March 2005.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

609 

KA 16-02042 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL J. BLARR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

EVAN LUMLEY, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JULIE BENDER FISKE OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael F.

Pietruszka, J.), rendered January 13, 2015. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of scheme to defraud in the first

degree (two counts) and one count each of grand larceny in the third

degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same memorandum as in People v Blarr ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___

[Apr. 28, 2017]).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 Statement - computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computations of Earnings per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                          For the Three Months
                                              Ended Mar. 31
                                        ------------------------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>
 
                                           1998         1997
                                        -----------  -----------
 
Net Earnings                            $ 4,251,000  $ 3,195,000
                                        ===========  ===========
 
Weighted average common
shares outstanding                       15,005,000   15,040,000
                                        ===========  ===========
 
Earnings per share of common stock      $       .28  $       .21
                                        ===========  ===========
 
</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 12, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1363

Lower Tribunal No. 19-23233

________________

Maria R. Sergent Chauser,

Appellant,

vs.

Adam Shai Chauser,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del 

Rey, Judge.

Maria R. Sergent Chauser, in proper person.

Kaplan Loebl, LLC, and Liliana Loebl and Amanda B. Haberman, for 

appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 

1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate 
2

court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude 

that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an 

alternative theory.”).