alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the CardioDynamics International Corporation (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Michael K. Perry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





|                        |  |                         |  | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: February 10, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael K. Perry    |  | 
|                        |  | Michael K. Perry        |  | 
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02545-RPM

SAMMY KING,

Plaintiff,

v.

GORDON TRUCKING, INC. and

SARAH GRAHAM,

Defendants.

 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

 

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on January 10, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. in the

Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver,

Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order which

may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx (Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch

Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions (Rev. 1/08). The proposed order (original

only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on January 5, 2012.

 The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of

parties will be permitted to attend.

Dated: November 9th , 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02545-RPM Document 7 Filed 11/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00098-CR

CANDACE BELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal 

Court No. 1

of Denton County (CR-2020-01494-A)

November 23, 2022

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001025573
<NAME>NATROL, INC 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          32,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                       304
<INVENTORY>                                        554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,023
<PP&E>                                           6,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,199
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,652
<SALES>                                         19,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,501
<CGS>                                            9,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    41
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .213
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .195
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                108,158
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          25,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                           170,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      308,603
<PP&E>                                 72,225
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        394,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 139,678
<BONDS>                               145,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  122
<OTHER-SE>                             89,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          394,273
<SALES>                               555,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      555,484
<CGS>                                 455,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      5,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (2,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (2,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           (2,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(E)

                                 INTERTAN, INC.

                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                                                               February 18, 2000

                                 PLAN AGREEMENT

To:  JEFFREY A. LOSCH

     The Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
InterTAN, Inc. (the "Committee") has selected you to participate in the Deferred
Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), a copy of which is furnished to you herewith.

     Your participation in the Plan is voluntary and conditioned upon your
acceptance of this Plan Agreement in the manner provided below, by which it
shall be agreed between us as follows:

     1)   Your participation in the Plan and the rights accruing to you and
          your designated Beneficiary(ies) thereunder shall be in all respects
          subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the full text of
          which, and as it may be from time to time amended, is incorporated
          herein by reference.  You agree to be bound by the terms and
          provisions of the Plan, and specifically, but without limitation, to
          the noncompetition provisions set forth in Section 5.5 of the Plan.

     2)   For the purpose of determining the amount of benefits payable by
          InterTAN, Inc. ("InterTAN") under the Plan, it is agreed and
          stipulated that your Plan Benefit Amount in Cdn. $785,000.  At the end
          of the Plan Agreement is an Addendum, which from time to time may be
          used to alter the Plan Benefit Amount as defined in the Plan by
          filling in the changed amount of the Plan Benefit Amount, by dating
          such change, and by InterTAN and you executing such Addendum.

     3)   You acknowledge receipt of a Beneficiary Designation Form furnished
          you herewith and agree that upon your acceptance and return of this
          Plan Agreement as provided below, you will deliver such form completed
          as therein required.

     If you desire to participate in the Plan, please accept and return the
enclosed copy of this letter, together with your completed Beneficiary
Designation Form, to James G. Gingerich, on or before thirty (30) days from the
date hereof, whereupon you shall become a Participant in the Plan according and
subject to the terms thereof.  If you do not accept and return such copy within
the above time period, then we will assume that you have voluntarily elected not
to participate in the Plan.

                               Yours very truly,

                               INTERTAN, INC.

                               /s/ Brian E. Levy
                          By: __________________________________________________
                              Brian E. Levy, President & Chief Executive Officer


ACCEPTED THIS 21st day of February, 2000.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Losch
________________________
Jeffrey A. Losch
#### Dora Kraus et al., as Executors of Jacob Kraus, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Monticello Insurance Company et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 29, 1957.

*Herman Katz*for plaintiffs.

*Turetzky, Cohen c& Rosen*for Monticello Insurance Company, defendant.

*Lowenstein, Pitcher, Spence, Hotchkiss, Amann & Parr*for Royal Insurance Company Limited and another, defendants.

Aron Steuer, J.

This is an application pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 59-a of the Insurance Law which provides that in a suit against a foreign insurance company not licensed to do business in this State that the company as a condition for filing any pleading must deposit with the court cash or securities or a bond, in an amount to be fixed by the court sufficient to secure the payment of any final judgment which may be *592rendered in such action. The question here is as to the amount of the deposit or bond to be required.

The insurance involved is fire insurance on a loft owned by the plaintiffs and the defendant is one of the three companies who had policies on the building. It appears without contradiction that the policy in question was issued at the behest of National Shoes, Inc., a tenant in the building. The lease to National Shoes by the plaintiff contained a provision that the said tenant would furnish the landlord fire insurance coverage in the sum of $8,000. National Shoes, Inc., was a tenant in several different buildings and a number of its leases contained similar clauses. To perform under them it applied for and was issued a single policy in the amount of $100,000 covering some 14 different locations therein enumerated. There is however no allocation of coverage as between these different buildings.

It is plaintiffs’ contention that defendant’s policy insures the building for $100,000 and on that basis taking plaintiff’s estimate of the loss and allocating it among the three companies according to their coverage, defendant’s share would be some $24,000. This interpretation has the enthusiastic support of the other companies, but not of this court.

Plaintiff contracted for a coverage of $8,000. It received a policy which was ambiguous in that respect but at least showed compliance by the tenant with his agreement. Plaintiff does not claim to be misled by the policy. His coverage and defendant’s are as he contracted.

Motion granted and defendant directed to deposit with the clerk $8,000 or post a bond in that sum.
#### HENRY W. STROHMEYER, APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF LITTLE FERRY, RESPONDENT.

Argued October 22, 1947

Decided January 29, 1948.

For the appellant, *Joseph H. Gaudielle*and *James A. Major.*

For the respondent, *Charles W. Weleck.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The appellant in this ease had been a police officer in the Borough of Little Eerry. On December 4th, 1945, he was suspended pending his trial on charges preferred against him. On September 9th, 1946, lie tvas given a trial and was found not guilty. The present action was for salary for the period from December 4th, 1945, to September 9th, 1946. The complaint was struck by the learned Judge of the Circuit Court and this action is before us on this appeal.

The right to suspend, pending a trial on charges, is granted by statute, *R. S.*40:47-6. Under *R. S.*40:46-34, it is provided that where a policeman or fireman has been illegally dismissed and such dismissal has been declared judicially illegal, the fireman or policeman shall be entitled to recover the salary of his office or employment for the period covered by the illegal dismissal. Dad the legislature also provided for recovery where a police officer was illegally suspended, the appellant’s right to recovery in this case would have been clear; but since no such right has been granted we are obliged to find that the ruling of the learned trial judge in striking *486the complaint was in all respects proper. *Sganga*v. *Teaneck Township,*130 *N. J. L.*218. In that case the authorities are collected. Apart from statute that there is no right of recovery for a salary not earned seems clear.

The judgment under appeal will be affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— None.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02499-BNB

JASON FRANCISCO AGUON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORONADO CROSSING APARTMENTS, and

(ETL) EVERYONE INVOLVED,

Defendants.

SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES

On October 25, 2011, Plaintiff, Jason Francisco Aguon, filed a Letter verifying

that he is no longer incarcerated. Previously, Plaintiff had submitted a Motion and

Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a Complaint and a Motion

to File Without Payment and Supporting Financial Affidavit. As part of the court’s review

pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the court has determined that the submitted

documents are deficient as described in this order. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the

following if he wishes to pursue his claims. Any papers that the Plaintiff files in

response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. 

Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915:

(1) is not submitted

(2) is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form) 

(3) xx is missing original signature by Plaintiff

(4) is missing affidavit

(5) affidavit is incomplete

(6) xx affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized

(7) names in caption do not match names in caption of complaint, petition or

Case 1:11-cv-02499-BNB Document 7 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

application

(8) xx other: Motion is necessary only if $350.00 filing fee is not paid in advance.

Complaint or Petition:

(9) is not submitted

(10) is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form) 

(11) is missing an original signature by the Plaintiff

(12) is incomplete

(13) uses et al. instead of listing all parties in caption

(14) names in caption do not match names in text

(15) __ addresses must be provided for all defendants/respondents in “Section A.

Parties” of complaint, petition or habeas application

(16) other 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty

(30) days from the date of this order. Any papers which the Plaintiff files in response

to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall obtain the court-approved Motion

and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 form, along with the

applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, if the Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies

within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the complaint and the action will

be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice.

DATED November 8, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02499-BNB Document 7 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. P. Kimble, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9,
2004



/s/ A.P. KimbleA. P. KimbleVice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 8 of 9
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 237 filed 03/13/13 USDC Colorado pg 9 of 9
#### THOMPSON v. WITT.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### Cecil MANN v. STATE.

7 Div. 129.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

SAMFOBD, Judge.

Affirmed.
<page>				       EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2006
| 1.   | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Trust Certificates (TRUCs), Series 2002-1 Trust; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the trust agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                           |   |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | By:  /s/ Anthony J. Horan                 |   |
|   |   |   | Name: Anthony J. Horan                    |   |
|   |   |   | Title:  Chief Executive Officer/President |   |
|   |   |   |                                           |   |
|   |   |   |                                           |   |
|   |   |   |   Bear Stearns Depositor Inc.             |   |
|   |   |   | Date:  March 30, 2011                     |   |

----
#### LENFESTY v. GAILOR.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.