alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent  registered  public  accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.
033-53524,  as amended, and 333-69057) and in the related  Prospectuses,  of our
report dated September 29, 2008 related to the consolidated financial statements
of  Dynatronics  Corporation  included in its Form  10-KSB for the fiscal  years
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.


/s/  Tanner LC


Salt Lake City, Utah
September 29, 2008




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the Anuhco, Inc. 1992 Incentive Stock
Plan, File No. 33-51494, the Stock Option Agreement by and between Anuhco, Inc.
and C. Ted McCarter, effective May 31, 1995, File No. 33-62553, and the
TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, File No. 333-66803,
of our report dated February 3, 1999, except for Note 10, as to which the date
is February 18, 1999, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. (formerly Anuhco,
Inc.) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996,, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.



                                   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                                   PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP




SEC/Consent Independent Acct

Kansas City, Missouri
March 15, 1999
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, February 4-8, 20Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,340,185 83,423 194,992 497,094 371,941 61,291 4,4Number of loans 16,773 1,165 2,119 6,979 3,497 692 Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.68 13.03 30.02 23.75 13.72 8.64 18.7

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.42 8.76 22.43 5.83 3.48 3.40 9.5

Weighted average risk rating3 3.11 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate 4 6.18 6.37 6.38 6.12 5.97 6.57 6.5

 Standard error5 .08 .23 .17 .15 .21 .26 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.72 6.98 6.72 6.90 6.66 7.64 7.5 25th percentile 5.38 6.00 5.39 5.12 5.34 5.73 6. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.54 6.60 5.91 6.85 6.69 6.35 n Other livestock 5.91 5.26 6.69 5.95 5.38 5.14 n Other current operating expenses7 6.37 6.44 6.67 6.47 5.80 6.78 7.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.46 5.66 6.76 6.32 7.29 5.81 6.9 Farm real estate 6.32 7.05 5.55 6.89 6.63 n.a. n Other8 5.80 6.98 5.84 5.43 6.07 6.35 6.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 75.61 35.06 35.67 86.46 87.34 72.53 79. Under commitment 77.23 75.38 75.71 86.01 79.63 68.73 79. Callable 19.98 35.12 56.29 13.57 5.87 23.86 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.89 6.99 7.17 6.33 1.71 .04 n Other livestock 5.70 3.37 12.05 3.00 8.04 6.56 n Other current operating expenses7 48.57 83.30 56.51 46.21 37.59 70.48 24. Farm machinery and equipment 2.91 5.50 .50 3.85 1.63 .24 14. Farm real estate 6.76 .74 15.61 4.84 5.10 n.a. n Other8 30.17 .10 8.15 35.78 45.94 22.67 61.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 11.54 7.92 18.24 9.35 7.49 8.38 28. Other 83.51 89.29 75.68 85.16 91.50 90.56 71. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 17, 2007



/s/ Ronald F. KlawitterRonald F. KlawitterExecutive Vice President of Administration,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DARRYL L. COOK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5049

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13

- cv

- 00870

- PEC, Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell

- Smith.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R
Darryl L. Cook moves to reconsider the court’s prior orders in this appeal. As noted in the September 25, 2014 letter from the Clerk of Court to Mr. Cook, this appeal was dismissed on July 1, 2014. O n July 29, 2014, this court ordered Mr. Cook to submit F orm 6, Form 6A, and his informal brief wi thin 30 days of the date of that order
to re

- open his appeal. Case: 14-5049 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 10/24/2014COOK v. US 2

The time for seeking reconsideration of this court’s orders has passed. See Fed. Cir. R. 45(a)(1). Any further motions or submissions by M r. Cook in this appeal will be retained but will not be acted upon.
Accordingly

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The motion is denied.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 Case: 14-5049 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 10/24/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         337,918
<SECURITIES>                                   404,587
<RECEIVABLES>                                  431,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,854
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,312,012
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,694,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,645,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     11,592,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,612,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,645,788
<SALES>                                      3,231,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,285,430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,389,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             979,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (426,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (426,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (426,485)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE
VALUE IS $0.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
               This schedule  contains Summary Financial  Information  extracted
               from the Balance Sheet and Income  Statement for the three months
               ended September 30, 1999 for Mobius Management Systems,  Inc. and
               is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such  Financial
               Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0001025148
<NAME>                                           MOBIUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       USD

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.0
<CASH>                                           33,104
<SECURITIES>                                      9,328
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                        864
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64,537
<PP&E>                                           11,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   85,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29,027
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              2
<OTHER-SE>                                       49,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     85,099
<SALES>                                          13,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13,383
<CGS>                                             1,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (4,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,843)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.16)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02605-RBJ-KLM

PAUL D. THOMPSON

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANS UNION INTERACTIVE,

Defendant.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 18th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBJ Document 6 Filed 10/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-85] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-85 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,  Department of Defense.

      ( print page 58132)          ( print page 58133)          ( print page 58134)          ( print page 58135)          ( print page 58136)          ( print page 58137)          ( print page 58138)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-23331 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
# **Exhibit31.2**

I, R. Herbert Hampton,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation:

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

b.              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.              [intentionallyomitted];

e.               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

f.                 Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

3.              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

4.               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 27, 2007
|   | /s/ R. Herbert Hampton      |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | R. Herbert Hampton          |
|   | Principal financial officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7073

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALVIN OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00371-JFA-1; 3:16-

cv-02470-JFA)

Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 20, 2023

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Owens, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7073 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was 

not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice 

of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal 

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on December 21, 2020. Owens filed his notice 

of appeal on September 4, 2022.*

 Because Owens failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Owens could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7073 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Innovative Chemical Corporation, Respondent, v Howe Plastics & Chemical Companies, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in *Innovative Chem. Corp. v Howe Plastics & Chem. Cos.*([appeal No. 1] 164 AD2d 965 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Obie Media Corporation (the Company )
on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Gary F.
Livesay,  Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ GARY F. LIVESAY
        Vice President
        Chief Financial Officer


































                                       23
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Obie Media Corporation (the Company )
on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Brian B.
Obie,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted  pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ BRIAN B. OBIE
        President
        Chief Executive Officer




































                                       24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02566-RPM-MEH 

MICHAEL GREEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

 THE COURT having reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice 

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and being fully advised in the premises, DOES 

HEREBY ORDER that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, with each party to pay his 

or its own attorney’s fees and costs. 

 BY THE COURT: 

March 9th, 2012 s/Richard P. Matsch 

__________________ ____________________________________ 

DATE Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02566-RPM-MEH Document 17 Filed 03/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-01934-DME-BNB Document 63 Filed 08/15/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1