alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1447 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to make decisions relating to proposed amendments to milk 

marketing orders not later than 90 days after the date on which the 

Secretary holds a hearing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to require the 

Secretary of Agriculture to make decisions relating to 

proposed amendments to milk marketing orders not later 

than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary 

holds a hearing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEADLINE FOR AMENDMENT DECISIONS FOR 

4 MILK MARKETING ORDERS. 

5 Section 8c(17) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 608c(17)), reenacted with amendments by the AgVerDate Aug 31 2005 20:13 May 26, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1447.IS S1447

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1447 IS

1 ricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amend2 ed— 

3 (1) by designating the first sentence as sub4 paragraph (A); and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) DEADLINE FOR AMENDMENT DECI7 SIONS.—The Secretary shall issue a decision re8 lating to any proposed amendment to a milk 

9 marketing order for which a hearing is held 

10 under this Act not later than 90 days after the 

11 date of the hearing.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Amos, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-168.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2019-OHIO-168

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. AMOS, APPELLEE.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Amos, Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-168.] 

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

(No. 2017-1778―Submitted January 9, 2019―Decided January 23, 2019.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, 

Nos. C-160717 and C-160718, 2017-Ohio-8448. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} This case is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. 

FRENCH, OSOWIK, DEWINE, DONNELLY, and STEWART, JJ., concur. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, J., dissent. 

THOMAS J. OSOWIK, J., of the Sixth District Court of Appeals, sitting for 

FISCHER, J. 

_________________ 

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula E. 

Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

Raymond T. Faller, Hamilton County Public Defender, and Julie Kahrs 

Nessler and Joshua A. Thompson, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellee. 

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Charlyn Bohland, Assistant 

Public Defender; Juvenile Law Center and Marsha L. Levick; Justice for Children 

Project and Kimberly P. Jordan; and Children’s Law Center, Inc., and Rickell 

Howard, urging affirmance for amici curiae Ohio Public Defender, Juvenile Law 

Center, National Juvenile Defender Center, Association for the Treatment of Sexual 

Abusers, Professor Catherine Carpenter, Justice for Children Project, and 

Children’s Law Center, Inc. 

_________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 3/31/99
FORM 10-K AN DIS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMETNS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,508
<INVENTORY>                                      1,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,102
<PP&E>                                           6,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,829
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,799)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,902
<SALES>                                         78,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,817
<CGS>                                           62,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (262)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,317)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,190)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02407-MSK-KLM

DAMON FOREMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WESTERN FREIGHTWAYS, LLC, and

NEW CENTURY TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Amend the

Scheduling Order to Extend the Discovery Cut-Off and Dispositive Motion Deadlines

[Docket No. 27; Filed July 25, 2012] (the “Motion”). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order

entered January 11, 2012 [#11] is amended as follows:

C Discovery Cutoff September 21, 2012

C Dispositive Motions Deadline October 22, 2012

Dated: July 26, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02407-MSK-KLM Document 29 Filed 07/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 31, 2002
**Exhibit 99.32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of BCE Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that: 

the annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company (the “Form 40-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 40-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March 12, 2014 | *(signed) George A. Cope* |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02549-WYD-KLM 

CLARK WILSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA, 

Defendant. 

ORDER OF RECUSAL 

This matter is before me on a review of the file. On November 2, 2011, Ms. 

Janet Savage was added as counsel for the Defendant via the Waiver of Service (ECF 

No. 6). Due to the fact that Ms. Savage is a former professional colleague of mine as 

well as a personal friend, I believe it would be inappropriate for me to preside over this 

case. Accordingly, I find that I should recuse myself from the case. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the judge's file be returned to the clerk and that the case be 

reassigned by random draw. 

Dated: November 4, 2011 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02549-RPM-KLM Document 7 Filed 11/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
816 A.2d 1046

#### LAWRENCE J. LEMING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRAH’S HOTEL & CASINO AND JOHN DOES, 1-25 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), INDIVIDUALLY, JOINTLY SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS

February 4, 2003.

This Matter having been duly considered and the Court having determined that certification was improvidently granted;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI and ALBIN join in this decision.
Exhibit 10.1


 


POI ACQUISITION, L.L.C.


QUADRANGLE MASTER FUNDING LTD


 


May 17, 2004


 


Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.


Protection One, Inc.


Network Multi-Family Security Corporation


c/o Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.


818 South Kansas Avenue


Topeka, Kansas 
66612


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We refer to the:  (a) Credit
Facility Standstill Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2004 (the
“Agreement”), among Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. (“POAM”), Protection
One, Inc., Network Multi-Family Security Corporation and POI Acquisition,
L.L.C. (“POI Acquisition”); and (b) letter from Quadrangle Master Funding Ltd
(“Quadrangle”) to POAM, dated February 27, 2004:  (i) advising POAM of Quadrangle’s assumption from POI Acquisition
of one-third of the obligations under the Credit Facility; and (ii) confirming
Quadrangle’s agreement to be bound by the obligations of POI Acquisition set
forth in the Agreement.  Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Agreement.


 


Pursuant to section 3 of the Agreement, the Agreement shall
terminate and be of no further force and effect on the Debt Specified Date
(which, under clause (i), is May 17, 2004). 
By this letter and at your request, we hereby agree to amend the definition
of the Outside Date to mean the date that is 97 days after the Effective Time
(the “Amendment”); provided, however, that this Amendment shall not apply to
section 5 of the Agreement.  Except
as otherwise provided herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect subject to the terms and provisions thereof.


 


This letter may be executed in counterparts.  Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and
returning to the undersigned the duplicate copy of this letter enclosed herewith.


 


Very truly yours,


 


	
  POI ACQUISITION, L.L.C.

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ David Tanner

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  David Tanner

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  
				



 

















 


	
  QUADRANGLE MASTER

  
	
  FUNDING LTD

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Michael Weinstock

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Michael Weinstock

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed as of the date first written above:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  PROTECTION ONE ALARM

  
	
  MONITORING, INC.

  
	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Darius G. Nevin

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Darius G. Nevin

  
	
  Title: Executive Vice President and

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  PROTECTION ONE, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Darius G. Nevin

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Darius G. Nevin

  
	
  Title: Executive Vice President and

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  NETWORK MULTI-FAMILY

  
	
  SECURITY CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Steve Williams

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Steve Williams

  
	
  Title: President
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of        Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle        Gold Corporation, (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the        Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the        “Report”) that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

  |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in                        all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the                        Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

        

Date:March 18, 2008

 

/s/ R. Herbert Hampton        R. Herbert Hampton        Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The        foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States        Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure        document.

 

61

----
TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.



Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JEFFREY W. TAYLOR                       
|                   |  |  |  |                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Jeffrey W. Taylor Chief Executive Officer      
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    BRUCE W. TAYLOR                         
|                   |  |  |  |                                                
|                   |  |  |  | Bruce W. Taylor Interim Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
| | Direct Phone: | (503) 952-7329        
| | ------------- | ----------------------
| | Direct Fax:   | (503) 952-7414        
| | E-Mail:       | mark.peterman@wfsg.com

## EXHIBIT 10.3

August 4, 2003

Mark H. Peterman
Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc.
14523 SW Millikan Way, Suite 200
Beaverton, Oregon  97005

Re:      Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc. - Change-in-Control Plan

Dear  Mark,

Wilshire Financial Services
Group Inc. has provided you with a Change-in-Control Plan dated as of June 22,
2000, as modified by a letter agreement dated June 25, 2002. Section 7.6 of the
Change-in-Control agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:

| | 7.6      Term
| | -------------

| | This
Plan shall expire and be of no further force and effect on December 31, 2003
provided, however, if the Company engages an investment banker to determine if
Wilshire Credit Corporation should and could be sold under terms and conditions
satisfactory to the Company, then this Plan shall continue or re-commence and
then shall expire and be of no further force and effect on the date that is 90
days after termination of the services of the investment banker, unless by such
date there is an agreement or letter of intent executed by Wilshire Credit
Corporation and/or the Company for the potential sale of Wilshire Credit
Corporation or its assets.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If this letter correctly
expresses your understanding of our agreement, please sign one duplicate
original in the space provided below and return it to me.

| | Sincerely yours,
| | ----------------

| | Stephen P. Glennon     
| | -----------------------
| | Chief Executive Officer

MHP:lb
Enclosure

|Agreed: | ----------------------------------
|------- | ----------------------------------
|        | Mark H. Peterman                  
|        | Date:  August 4, 2003
#### Wesley (Boy) CORBIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

March 23, 1955.

Scruggs & Carmichael, Gainesville, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bart L. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

DREW, Justice.

This appellant has appealed from a final judgment sentencing him to three years in prison after a jury verdict of guilty of breaking and entering a certain building of another with intent to commit a felony. He was tried jointly with a codefendant James Gainey. At the trial the State proved that a service station in Cross City was entered and a cash register removed valued at $150, and introduced into evidence an extra-judicial confession of the defendant James Gainey in which he stated that the appellant assisted in the crime. Gainey repudiated this confession at the trial. The appellant at all times when confronted with the accusation of James Gainey denied that-he took part in the crime and testified in denial at the trial.

Except for the extra-judicial confession of the codefendant Gainey, there is nothing in the record to implicate the appellant in the crime with which he is charged and of which he was found guilty along with his codefendant. Under these circumstances argues appellant, the evidence is not sufficient under the law to sustain a conviction. We agree and have,-so held. Stoutamire v. State, 133 Fla. 757, 183 So. 316.

In its brief the State, with commendable candor, concedes that the judgment below must be reversed because the evidence in the record is wholly insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Reversed.

■MATHEWS, C. J., THOMAS, J., and McNEILL, Associate Justice, concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-014-01-JD

Ugochukwu Ossai

O R D E R

Counsel for the defendant has filed a motion, assented to by

the government, seeking an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241

directing that the defendant undergo psychiatric or psychological

evaluations to determine his mental competency (document no. 46). 

The motion is granted. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General for placement in a suitable facility for the purpose of

an examination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241, for a period not to

exceed thirty days. 

A report shall be filed with the court with copies provided

to the government and counsel for the defendant in accordance

with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 4247(c).

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

District Judge

December 8, 2005

cc: Jonathan R. Saxe, Esquire

Terry L. Ollila, Esquire

U.S. Probation

U.S. Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00014-JD Document 47 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 1