alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with Annual Report of SI Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Howard George, Corporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2004                    
|                                          
|/s/    HOWARD GEORGE                      
|Howard George                             
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



127
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 24
<PAGE>
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     We, the undersigned directors of the Registrant, hereby severally
constitute and appoint Steven K. Colliatie our true and lawful attorney and
agent, to do any and all things in our names in the capacities indicated below
which said person may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Registrant to
comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules,
regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
1996, including specifically, but not limited to, power and authority to sign
for us in our names in the capacities indicated below the annual report and any
amendments thereto; and we hereby approve, ratify and confirm all that said
person shall do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.



 
/s/ Joan H. Schonholtz                                     March 20, 1997
------------------------------------------                                  
Joan H. Schonholtz
Chairman of the Board


/s/ Abbey J. Butler                                        March 20, 1997
------------------------------------------                                  
Abbey J. Butler
Director
 
 
/s/ Melvin J. Estrin                                       March 20, 1997
----------------------
Melvin J. Estrin
Director
 

/s/ Nella C. Manes                                         March 20, 1997
----------------------
Nella C. Manes
Director
 


/s/ Avis Y. Pointer                                        March 20, 1997
----------------------
Avis Y. Pointer
Director
#### FREDERICK SCHILL & CO., APPELLANT, v. OLUF R. LARSEN, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 21, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the appellant, *Laurence, Semel.*

For the respondent, *Kaplon, Alenick*& *Kaplon (Michael G. Alenick,*of counsel).

Per Curiah.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for tile reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bobine, Heher, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan. McLean, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
 The Board of Directors
  Dynatronics Corporation and Subsidiary:
  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 033-53524, as amended, and 333-69057 and 333-206760) and on Form S-3 of our report dated September 28, 2015, with respect to the consolidated audited financial statements of Dynatronics Corporation and Subsidiary as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and for the years then ended.
  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Registration Statement on Form S-3.
  
  Salt Lake City, Utah
 September 28, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02594-RPM

DALE GROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer; 

IAN SWEENEY, Community Parole Officer; 

JENNIFER DUNCAN, Community Parole Officer; 

ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board; 

ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board; 

DENISE BALAZIC, Member of the Parole Board; 

PATRICIA BAN WAAK, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN O’DELL, Member of the Parole Board; 

MICHAEL ANDERSON, Member of the Parole Board; 

REBECCA OAKES, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN DAVIS, President of RSA, Inc.; 

JOHN DOES, Numbers 1-2, unknown officers of RSA Inc.; 

WALTER T. SIMON, President of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

JOHN DOES, Numbers 3-4, unknown officers of Progressive Therapy Systems PC; 

FREDERICK E. TOLSON, President Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

JOHN DOES, Number 5-6, unknown officers of Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program,

Inc.; and 

JOHN DOES, Number 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment

Program, Inc., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon review of the Unopposed Motion for Two Week Extension of Time to File

Response to Motion to Dismiss [8] filed January 17, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the deadline for plaintiff to respond to

the motion to dismiss is extended to and including February 1, 2012.

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 9 Filed 01/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

DATED: January 18th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 9 Filed 01/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Beck *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 25206

Decided June 5, 1935.)

*583
      *Mr. Alvin H. Rowe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Louis J. Schneider,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Dudley M. Outcalt*and *Mr. Gordon H. Scherer,*for defendant in error.

Day, J.

The controversy in this case hinges upon the failure of the trial court, in its charge to the jury, to define reasonable doubt in the exact language of the statute (Section 13442-3, General Code). Whether such failure constitutes reversible error is the principal question presented for our determination.

Section 13442-3, General Code, provides: “A defendant in a criminal action is presumed to be innocent until he is proved guilty of the crime charged, and in case of a reasonable doubt whether his guilt is satisfactorily shown, he shall be acquitted. But the effect of this presumption of innocence is only to place upon the state the burden of proving him guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt is defined as follows: ‘It is not a mere possible doubt, because everything relating to human affairs or depending upon moral evidence is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction to a moral certainty of the truth of the charge.’ In charging a jury the court shall state the meaning of presumption of innocence, and read the foregoing definition of reasonable doubt.”

In charging the jury it is mandatory upon the trial court to read or charge substantially the definition of reasonable doubt contained in the above quoted section of the code.

The definition of reasonable doubt was substantially correct as given, although not in the exact language *584of the statute. The error complained of is technical rather than prejudicial.

The verdict will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02312-WYD-MEH

DAIRY TECH, INC., a Colorado corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARI-TECH, INC., a Washington corporation,

Defendant.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal

filed May 4, 2012 (ECF No. 16). After a review of the Stipulation and the file, it is

hereby

ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay

its own costs and attorney’s fees.

Dated: May 7, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-02312-WYD-MEH Document 17 Filed 05/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1337 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to provide for equal coverage 

of mental health services under the State Children’s Health Insurance 

Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. SMITH, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to provide 

for equal coverage of mental health services under the 

State Children’s Health Insurance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Mental 

5 Health Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PARITY FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN SCHIP. 

7 (a) ASSURANCE OF PARITY.—Section 2103(c) of the 

8 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397cc(c)) is amended— 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 1337 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para2 graph (6); and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4), the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(5) MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PARITY.— 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a State 

7 child health plan that provides both medical 

8 and surgical benefits and mental health or sub9 stance abuse benefits, such plan shall ensure 

10 that the financial requirements and treatment 

11 limitations applicable to such mental health or 

12 substance abuse benefits are no more restrictive 

13 than the financial requirements and treatment 

14 limitations applied to substantially all medical 

15 and surgical benefits covered by the plan. 

16 ‘‘(B) DEEMED COMPLIANCE.—To the ex17 tent that a State child health plan includes cov18 erage with respect to an individual described in 

19 section 1905(a)(4)(B) and covered under the 

20 State plan under section 1902(a)(10)(A) of the 

21 services described in section 1905(a)(4)(B) (re22 lating to early and periodic screening, diag23 nostic, and treatment services defined in section 

24 1905(r)) and provided in accordance with secVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:43 May 09, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1337.IS S1337

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•S 1337 IS

1 tion 1902(a)(43), such plan shall be deemed to 

2 satisfy the requirements of subparagraph (A).’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2103 of 

4 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1397cc) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

6 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘subsection (c)(5)’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘paragraphs (5) and (6) of subsection (c)’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking subpara10 graph (B) and redesignating subparagraphs (C) and 

11 (D) as subparagraphs (B) and (C), respectively. 

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section take effect on October 1, 2007. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
                           This schedule contains summary financial  information
                           extracted from the financial statements of Obie Media
                           Corporation,  which  are  included  in its  quarterly
                           report on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended May 31,
                           2000,  and is  qualified in its entirety by reference
                           to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                  49,159
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                       10,444,273
<ALLOWANCES>                           423,504
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    14,408,005
<PP&E>                              21,355,194
<DEPRECIATION>                       5,751,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,555,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               10,868,730
<BONDS>                              9,539,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                            16,848,581
<OTHER-SE>                           1,016,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        37,555,847
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    21,875,911
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       14,741,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       855,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     507,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        509,839
<INCOME-TAX>                           198,856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    310,983
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                           310,983
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.05


</TABLE>
As of March 4, 2021, the ASCII format data tables for the H.4.1 Factors Affecting Reserve Balances will no longer be available on this webpage. Historical data tables will continue to be available and current data will continue to be available through the Data Download Program (https://www.federalreserve.gov/datadownload/Choose.aspx?rel=H41) and HTML (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/current/default.htm).
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 23-1467

___________

JONATHAN ANDRE GILMORE,

Appellant

v.

DR. STEPHANY MCGANN, MD/CD; DR. KYLE KNOWLES, MD; DR. C. MORLEY, 

PHD

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 1:21-cv-19018)

District Judge: Honorable Renee M. Bumb

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or

Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

on August 24, 2023

Before: HARDIMAN, RESTREPO, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: September 20, 2023)

____________________________________
2

___________

OPINION*

___________

PER CURIAM

Jonathan Andre Gilmore, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Bivens1

action alleging Defendant Stephany McGann, a doctor and lieutenant commander in the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS), violated his Eighth Amendment 

right to adequate medical care. He also alleged that the Defendants violated his First 

Amendment rights by altering his medical records in hope of avoiding liability and in retaliation for the administrative grievances that he leveled against them. The Defendants 

filed a motion to dismiss, which was granted by the District Court. This appeal followed. 

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review 

over a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000). We may take summary action when no substantial issue is presented on appeal. See 3d Cir. L.A.R. 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6. 

The District Court correctly concluded that McGann, as a PHS employee, is not personally subject to Bivens actions challenging conduct “arising out of the performance of 

medical or related functions within the scope of [her] employment.” See 42 U.S.C. § 

233(a); Hui v. Castaneda, 559 U.S. 799, 802 (2010) (“Based on the plain language of § 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.

1 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971).
3

233(a), we conclude that PHS officers and employees are not personally subject to 

Bivens actions for harms arising out of such conduct.”). 

Similarly, the District Court rightly dismissed Gilmore’s First Amendment retaliation 

claim, because Bivens does not encompass such a cause of action. See Egbert v. Boule, 

142 S.Ct. 1793, 1807 (2022). 

Because Gilmore’s appeal does not present a substantial question, we will affirm the 

District Court’s dismissal of his complaint. Likewise, we deny Gilmore’s motion for appointment of counsel and oral argument.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57629-57630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, (ACIP)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:
    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-6 p.m., October 22, 2008; 8 a.m.-5 p.m., 
October 23, 2008.
    Place: CDC, Tom Harkin Global Communications Center, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., Building 19, Kent ``Oz'' Nelson Auditorium, Atlanta, Georgia 
30333.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available.
    Purpose: The committee is charged with advising the Director, CDC, 
on the appropriate uses of immunizing agents. In addition, under 42 
U.S.C. 1396s, the committee is mandated to establish and periodically 
review and, as appropriate, revise the list of vaccines for 
administration to vaccine-eligible children through the Vaccines for 
Children (VFC) program, along with schedules regarding the appropriate 
periodicity, dosage, and contraindications applicable to the vaccines.
    Matters to be Discussed: The agenda will include discussions on 
Pneumococcal Vaccines; Anthrax Vaccine; General Recommendations; Human 
Papillomavirus Vaccines; Adult Immunization Schedules; 2009 
Immunization Schedules for children 0-18 years of age; Hepatitis 
Vaccines; Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine; Rabies Vaccine Supply; 
Influenza; Immunization Safety Update; Vaccine Supply; Adolescent 
National Immunization Survey Results; Rotavirus Vaccines; MMRV Vaccine; 
and Tdap (Boostrix) in Adults.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Antonette Hill, Immunization 
Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory 
Diseases, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop (E-05), Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, Telephone (404)639-8836, Fax (404)639-8905.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee

[[Page 57630]]

management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances 
and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 25, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-23397 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02507-PAB

DIXIE BORN,

Plaintiff,

v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services,

Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 13] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on

September 24, 2013 it is

ORDERED that the decision of the Secretary that plaintiff is not entitled to

benefits under Medicare Part B is AFFIRMED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff recovers nothing, the action be dismissed.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 24th day of September, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

s/Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02507-PAB Document 14 Filed 09/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495;

Defendants.

 

MOTION TO UNSEAL CASE

The United States of America, by and through Attorney General of the United States Eric

Holder, Barry R. Grissom, United States Attorney for the District of Kansas, through Special

Attorneys Richard L. Hathaway and Christine E. Kenney, move this Court to enter an Order to

Unseal the above captioned matter and all documents filed therein. 

In support of this motion the government makes the following showing:

The concerns involved at the time the Order to Seal was granted no longer apply..

WHEREFORE, the government moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order unsealing

the above captioned matter and all documents filed therein.

DATED this ____ day of September, 2011.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 17 filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED 

STATES

&

BARRY R. GRISSOM, # 10866

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

DISTRICT OF KANSAS

barry.grissom@usdoj.gov

by:

s/Richard L. Hathaway, #07767

rich.hathaway@usdoj.gov

&

s/Christine E. Kenney, #13542

christine.kenney@usdoj.gov

Special Attorneys 

444 SE QUINCY, SUITE 290

TOPEKA, KS 66683

Phone: (785) 295-2850

Fax: (785) 295-2853

2

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 17 filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2