Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 192 / Thursday, October 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 57245 

imprecise coordinates. With this 

document the Coast Guard is correcting 

the coordinates of the boundaries to the 

three Yarmouth special anchorages 

listed in 33 CFR 110.5, in response to 

more detailed information received from 

the National Ocean Service (NOS). 

These changes will not affect the 

locations or the size of the anchorages. 

DATES: This correction is effective 

November 3, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call Mr. 

John J. Mauro, First Coast Guard District 

Prevention and Waterways, (617) 223– 

8355, E-mail: John.J.Mauro@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 12, 2008, we published a 

final rule entitled Anchorage 

Regulations; Yarmouth, ME, Casco Bay 

in the Federal Register (73 FR 13125) 

establishing three Special Anchorage 

areas in Yarmouth, Maine, Casco Bay. 

However, NOS notified the Coast Guard 

that the geographic coordinates for 

Madeleine and Sandy Point Special 

Anchorage and Drinkwater Point and 

Princes Point Special Anchorages used 

in the NPRM and final rules created a 

boundary that did not entirely enclose 

the anchorage areas. NOS is able to plot 

very precise coordinates, and 

determined that the published 

coordinates allowed a ‘‘gap’’ of a few 

yards in the boundaries of these 

anchorages. The Coast Guard has 

reviewed the updated coordinates and 

graphics sent by NOS and agrees with 

NOS’s assessment. We have issued this 

correction with the updated coordinates 

for the boundaries according to NOS’s 

assessment. We will notify mariners of 

this correction via the Local Notice to 

Mariners once this rule appears in the 

Federal Register. 

Need for Correction 

As published, the final rule contains 

errors that need to be clarified. The 

boundaries of an anchorage area should 

completely enclose the area, without 

any gaps that could create confusion 

when represented on a chart. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 

Anchorage grounds. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard corrects 33 

CFR part 110 by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 110—ANCHORAGE 

REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 110 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471; 1221 through 

1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Revise § 110.5 paragraph (f) to read 

as follows: 

§ 110.5 Casco Bay, Maine. 

* * * * * 

(f) Yarmouth Harbor and adjacent 

waters—(1) Littlejohn Island/Doyle 

Point Cousins Island Special Anchorage. 

All of the waters enclosed by a line 

connecting the following points: 

Starting from the northernmost point of 

Littlejohn Island at latitude 43°45′51.6′′ 

N, longitude 70°06′57.0′′ W; thence to 

latitude 43°45′46.8′′ N, longitude 

70°06′53.4′′ W; thence to latitude 

43°45′25.8′′ N, longitude 70°07′22.8′′ W; 

thence to latitude 43°45′16.8′′ N, 

longitude 70°07′40.8′′ W; thence to 

latitude 43°44′57.0′′ N, longitude 

70°08′27.0′′ W; thence to latitude 

43°44′59.9′′ N, longitude 70°08′30.0′′ W. 

DATUM: NAD 83. 

(2) Madeleine and Sandy Point 

Special Anchorage. All of the waters 

enclosed by a line connecting the 

following points: Starting from a point 

northeast of Birch Point on Cousins 

Island at latitude 43°45′15.1′′ N, 

longitude 70°09′16.8′′ W; thence to 

latitude 43°45′21.0′′ N, longitude 

70°09′30.0′′ W; thence to latitude 

43°45′37.8′′ N, longitude 70°09′10.8′′ W; 

thence to latitude 43°45′57.0′′ N, 

longitude 70°08′58.8′′ W; thence to 

latitude 43°46′01.3′′ N, longitude 

70°08′45.0′′ W. DATUM: NAD 83. 

(3) Drinkwater Point and Princes 

Point Special Anchorage. All of the 

waters enclosed by a line connecting the 

following points: Starting south of 

Drinkwater Point in Yarmouth, Maine at 

latitude 43°46′26.8′′ N, longitude 

70°09′17.0′′ W; thence to latitude 

43°46′21.0′′ N, longitude 70°09′09.6′′ W; 

thence to latitude 43°46′04.2′′ N, 

longitude 70°09′46.2′′ W; thence to 

latitude 43°45′28.8′′ N, longitude 

70°10′24.0′′ W; thence to latitude 

43°45′43.2′′ N, longitude 70°10′24.0′′ W. 

DATUM: NAD 83. 

Note to paragraph (f). An ordinance of the 

Town of Yarmouth, Maine requires the 

approval of the Yarmouth Harbor Master for 

the location and type of moorings placed in 

these special anchorage areas. All anchoring 

in the areas are under the supervision of the 

Yarmouth Harbor Master or other such 

authority as may be designated by the 

authorities of the Town of Yarmouth, Maine. 

All moorings are to be so placed that no 

moored vessel will extend beyond the limit 

of the anchorage area. 

Dated: September 16, 2008. 

Liam J. Slein, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Commander, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. E8–23200 Filed 10–1–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

36 CFR Part 1228 

[FDMS Docket NARA–07–0004] 

RIN 3095–AB43 

Federal Records Management; Media 

Neutral Schedules 

AGENCY: National Archives and Records 

Administration. 

ACTION: Correcting amendment. 

SUMMARY: This document contains a 

correction to the final regulations, 

which were published in the Federal 

Register of Thursday, November 15, 

2007 (72 FR 64155). The regulations 

allowed agencies to make new Federal 

records schedules and certain existing 

approved records schedules applicable 

to series of records regardless of the 

medium in which the records are 

created and maintained. 

DATES: October 2, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura McCarthy at 301–837–1640. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The final regulations that are the 

subject of this correction made new 

Federal records schedules media neutral 

unless otherwise specified and allowed 

schedules previously approved for hard 

copy records to be applied to electronic 

versions of the files if certain conditions 

are met. The regulation applies to all 

Federal agencies, including the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). 

Need for Correction 

As published, the final regulations 

contain an error in § 1228.24(b)(3); the 

paragraph requires an effective date and 

not the instruction to use the effective 

date of the rule. 

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1228 

Archives and records. 

■ Accordingly, 36 CFR part 1228 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendment: 

PART 1228–DISPOSITION OF 

FEDERAL RECORDS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1228 

continues to read as follows: 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
57246 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 192 / Thursday, October 2, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

1Although the E-Check program began on January 

1, 1996, there was a vehicle I/M program operating 

in the Cincinnati-Hamilton area prior to that date, 

and prior to November 15, 1990. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. chs. 21, 29, and 33. 

■ 2. In § 1228.24, revise paragraph (b)(3) 

to read as follows: 

§ 1228.24 Formulation of agency records 

schedules. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(3) Records schedules submitted to 

NARA for approval on or after 

December 17, 2007, are media neutral, 

i.e., the disposition instructions apply to 

the described records in all media, 

unless the schedule identifies a specific 

medium for a specific series. 

* * * * * 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Adrienne C. Thomas, 

Deputy Archivist of the United States. 

[FR Doc. E8–23379 Filed 10–1–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1100; FRL–8723–9] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

Removal of Vehicle Inspection and 

Maintenance Programs for Cincinnati 

and Dayton 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of Ohio which 

allows the State to discontinue the 

vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/ 

M) program in the Cincinnati-Hamilton 

and Dayton-Springfield areas, also 

known as the E-Check program. The 

revision specifically requests that the ECheck program regulations be moved 

from the active control measures portion 

of the SIP to the contingency measures 

portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton and 

Dayton-Springfield ozone maintenance 

plans. The Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) 

submitted this request on April 4, 2005, 

and supplemented it on May 20, 2005, 

February 14, 2006, May 9, 2006, October 

6, 2006, and February 19, 2008. EPA is 

approving Ohio’s request because the 

State has demonstrated that 

discontinuing the I/M program in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton and DaytonSpringfield areas will not interfere with 

the attainment and maintenance of the 

8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) and the fine 

particulate NAAQS or with the 

attainment and maintenance of other air 

quality standards. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

November 3, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1100. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 

Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This 

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

legal holidays. We recommend that you 

telephone Francisco J. Acevedo at (312) 

886–6061 before visiting the Region 5 

office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Francisco J. Acevedo, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Criteria Pollutant 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6052. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this action? 

II. What is our response to comments 

received on the notice of proposed 

rulemaking? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for this 

action? 

The Cincinnati-Hamilton and DaytonSpringfield areas were required to 

implement ‘‘basic’’ I/M programs under 

section 182(b)(4) of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) because they were originally 

designated as moderate 1-hour ozone 

nonattainment areas. In order to 

maximize nitrogen oxides (NOX), 

volatile organic compound (VOC), and 

carbon monoxide (CO) emissions 

reductions from the I/M program, Ohio 

EPA chose to implement an ‘‘enhanced’’ 

program in those areas and incorporated 

an on-board diagnostic (OBD) 

component into the programs. EPA fully 

approved Ohio’s I/M programs on April 

4, 1995 (60 FR 16989). The E-Check 

programs began operation on January 2, 

1996, to meet nonattainment area 

requirements for the ozone NAAQS 

effective at the time.1 The Cincinnati 

ozone nonattainment area also includes 

three counties (Boone, Campbell, and 

Kenton Counties) in northern Kentucky. 

Both the Cincinnati-Hamilton area 

and the Dayton-Springfield area have 

since been redesignated to attainment 

with respect to the 1-hour ozone 

NAAQS. The Cincinnati-Hamilton area 

was redesignated to attainment of the 1- 

hour ozone NAAQS on June 21, 2005 

(70 FR 35946). The Dayton-Springfield 

area was redesignated to attainment of 

the 1-hour ozone NAAQS on May 5, 

1995 (60 FR 22289). On August 13, 2007 

(72 FR 45169), EPA approved the 

redesignation of the Dayton-Springfield 

area to attainment with respect to the 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS. 

EPA approved maintenance plans for 

each of these areas in connection with 

these redesignations. These approved 

maintenance plans show that control 

measures in place in these areas are 

sufficient for overall emissions to 

remain beneath the attainment level of 

emissions until the end of the 

maintenance period. In both cases, the 

conformity budget in the maintenance 

plans reflects mobile source emissions 

without E-Check, and the maintenance 

plans demonstrate that the applicable 

standard will continue to be met 

without E-Check. In accordance with 

the CAA and EPA redesignation 

guidance, states are free to adjust 

control strategies in the maintenance 

plan as long as they can satisfy section 

110(l). With such a demonstration of 

non-interference with attainment or 

other applicable requirements, control 

programs may be discontinued and 

removed from the SIP. 

Ohio EPA submitted a revision to the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton and DaytonSpringfield portions of the Ohio SIP on 

April 4, 2005, and supplemented it on 

May 20, 2005, February 14, 2006, May 

9, 2006, October 6, 2006, and February 

19, 2008. This revision requested that 

the Ohio I/M programs in the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton and DaytonSpringfield areas be moved from the 

active control measures portion of the 

ozone SIP to the contingency measures 

portion of the Cincinnati-Hamilton and 

Dayton-Springfield Maintenance Plans. 

As part of its submittal, Ohio EPA 

demonstrated continued maintenance of 

the 1-hour ozone standard without 

taking credit for reductions from the 

Cincinnati-Hamilton E-Check program, 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES