alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
99.1






To Whom
it May Concern:


I, John
Kinross-Kennedy, hereby consent to the inclusion of information contained in my
valuation report dated December 30, 2008, relating to a valuation of Electric
Motor Sports, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability company, in any reports filed by
Balqon Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including the  Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-156446), and any amendments and/or
supplements thereto.  I also hereby consent to any reference to myself
under the caption "Experts" in the above-referenced filings, including the above
mentioned Registration Statement.
  Sincerely,/s/
      John Kinross-KennedyName:
      John Kinross-Kennedy

                    Date:
      March 30, 2009
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Mitchell Gross
--------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02498-BNB

DANIEL L. HOFF,

Plaintiff,

v.

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL DEPARTMENT,

WARDEN TRAVIS TRANI, Arrowhead Cor. Fac.,

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TOM CLEMENTS, Colorado Department of Corrections,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Daniel L. Hoff, initiated this action while he was a prisoner in the custody

of the Colorado Department of Corrections. On October 27, 2011, Magistrate Judge

Boyd N. Boland entered an order granting Mr. Hoff leave to proceed in forma pauperis

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because he was a prisoner, Magistrate Judge Boland

ordered Mr. Hoff to pay an initial partial filing fee within thirty days and to make monthly

filing fee payments until the filing fee was paid in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2). 

Mr. Hoff did not pay the initial partial filing fee within the time allowed.

On December 8, 2011, Magistrate Judge Boland entered an order directing Mr.

Hoff to file a new motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the Court’s

nonprisoner form because it appeared that Mr. Hoff had been released from custody

and no longer was a prisoner. Alternatively, Magistrate Judge Boland advised Mr. Hoff

that he could pay the $350.00 filing fee. Mr. Hoff was warned that the action would be

dismissed without further notice if he failed either to pay the filing fee or to file a new

motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days.

Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 12 Filed 01/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Mr. Hoff has failed within the time allowed either to pay the filing fee or to file a

new motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis as directed. In fact, Mr. Hoff

has failed to communicate with the Court in any way since his last filing on October 17,

2011. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

a court order and failure to prosecute.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any

appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis

status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369

U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455

appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App.

P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice

pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Hoff failed

to comply with a court order and has failed to prosecute this action. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is

denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 17th day of January , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 12 Filed 01/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT**

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. 

Naperville, Illinois 

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary as of November 1, 2003 (Successor Company), and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-monthperiods ended November 1, 2003, the three-month and seven-month periods ended November 2, 2002 (Successor Company) and the two-month period ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company) and of cash flows for the nine-month period ended November 1, 2003,the seven-month period ended November 2, 2002 (Successor Company) and the two-month period ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It issubstantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our reviews, we arenot aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in theUnited States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary as of February 1, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the 43weeks ended February 1, 2003 and the 9 weeks ended April 6, 2002 (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 5, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forthin the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of February 1, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

December 4, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02610-WJM-MJW

PARK MONACO ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order

and Stay Discovery Pending Resolution of Real Party In Interest Issue (docket no. 31) is

DENIED. The mere fact that there is a companion case filed in the Arapahoe County

District Court does not mandate that this case to be stayed. Moreover, nothing prevents

the parties from settling this case at anytime and nothing prevents the parties from filing

a Joint Motion to Dismiss this case at anytime. The mere fact that the parties may be

engaging in settlement discussions in the companion litigation, does not, in and of itself,

merit a stay of discovery or a vacation of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order. Lastly, nothing

prevents the parties from filing a motion for administrative closure pursuant to

D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. 

Date: May 24, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02610-WJM-MJW Document 33 Filed 05/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1184** 

EUGENE OPOKU

- BAMFO ,
Petitioner ,

v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : July 16, 2014 Decided: July 30, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia , for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General , Holly M. Smith, S enior Litigation Counsel, Remi d a Rocha

- Afodu , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eugene Opoku

- Bamfo, a native and citizen of Ghana,
petition s for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) dismissing hi s appeal from the immigration
judge’s decision, which denied Opoku

- Bamfo’s motion for a

continuance and ordered him removed to Ghana. We have reviewed

the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion. See

Lendo v. Gonzales , 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting

forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition

for review for the reasons stated by the Board

. In re: Opoku

Bamfo (B.I.A. Jan. 29, 2014). * We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* The Attorney General appears to concede that the Board failed to adequately address Opoku

- Bamfo’s argument that the immigration judge did not give him an opportunity to seek prosecutorial discretion with the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) . To th e extent that any error occurred, we conclude that remand is not warranted “[b]ecause the result of a remand to the Board is a foregone conclusion such that remand would amount to nothing more than a mere formality.” Hussain v. Gonzales , 477 F.3d 153, 158 (4th Cir. 2007). Opoku

- Bamfo does not claim that he has ever attempted to confer with the DHS regarding the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in his case , and thus cannot credibly claim that the agency should have granted an open

- ended continuance on this ground.
B

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 4 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 5 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 6 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 7 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 8 of

9
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-2 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 9 of

9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000718083
<NAME> HUNTINGDON LIFE SCIENCES GROUP PLC
<CURRENCY> POUNDS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   0.62
<CASH>                                       5,258,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,399,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   115,000
<INVENTORY>                                    803,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,403,000
<PP&E>                                     121,070,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              52,101,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,635,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,308,000
<BONDS>                                     31,023,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,550,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,334,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,635,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,215,000
<CGS>                                       51,517,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,036,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               687,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,930,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,438,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,343,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,095,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,095,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.014
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.014


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350





The undersigned, Edward
Kirnbauer, the Chief Financial Officer of Procom Technology, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, hereby certifies that:





| | (i) |  | the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:

/s/    EDWARD
KIRNBAUEREdward Kirnbauer Acting Chief
Financial Officer





Date: December 16, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.9.1.5

                                     ANNEX A

                                Matthew B. Walker

                                Employment Terms

1.   1,250,000 shares of Common Stock.

2.   0 shares of Preferred Stock

3.   a check

4.   $125,000.

5.   Commonwealth of Virginia

6.   625,000 shares of Common Stock.

7.   Vice President and Chief Technology Officer

8.   Chief Executive Officer

9.   None

10.  $140,000

11.  120 %

12.  Performance Cause is inapplicable to the Executive.

                                       1
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00466- CR

LesterRay G uy, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 331 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -DC- 10- 3025 48, H ONO RAB LE DAVID CRAIN, J UDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s attorney has filed a fifth motion for extension of t i me to file a brief. We g rant the motion, extending the d ea d l i n e to October 14, 2013, but caution counsel that any further motions for extension of time will result in the abate ment of this appeal for a hear ing pursuant to rule 38.8(b).

It is ordere d October

9, 2013.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 140 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 140

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telephone Excise Tax Repeal Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to facilities and services) is amended by striking subchapter 
B.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121) and subchapter B of chapter 33,'' and inserting ``and 
        chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121),''.
            (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``section 4251 or''.
            (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (i) by striking ``imposed by--'' and all that 
                follows through ``with respect to'' and inserting 
                ``imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect to'', 
                and
                    (ii) by striking ``bills rendered or''.
            (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``Communications Services and''.
            (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``4251, 4261, or 4271'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``4261 or 4271''.
            (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such Code is 
        amended by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B), by 
        striking subparagraph (C), and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (D) as subparagraph (C).
            (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills first rendered more than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00399-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. BRANDON HENRY,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on January 9, 2012. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for January 19, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the

documents are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no

exceptions to this policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them

an original and one (1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See 

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 

1. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for January 19, 2012, is VACATED;

and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for the change of

plea hearing. 

Dated: January 9, 2012

Case 1:11-cr-00399-REB Document 18 Filed 01/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ MARK A. HOPPE                                           
|                   |  |  |  | Mark A. Hoppe President and
Chief Executive Officer         
|                   |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ RANDALL T. CONTE                                        
|                   |  |  |  | Randall T. Conte Chief
Operating and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and will be retained by Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon
request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133693 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133693 

 COA: 275833 

Oakland CC: 2003-192859-FH 

ANDREW JOSEPH CASCHERA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 22, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case to the trial court for correction of the 

presentence report. 

p0914 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 21, 2007 

Clerk