56866 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 190 / Tuesday, September 30, 2008 / Notices 

—resource exploration and extraction, 

including sand and gravel removal 

and timber harvesting. 

Reclamation reviews applications to 

determine whether granting individual 

use authorizations is compatible with 

Reclamation’s present or future uses of 

the lands, facilities, or waterbodies. 

When we find a proposed use 

compatible, we advise the applicant of 

the estimated administrative costs and 

estimated application processing time. 

In addition to the administrative costs, 

we require the applicant to pay the 

value of the use authorization based on 

an appraisal or competitive bidding. If 

the application is for construction of a 

bridge, building, or other significant 

construction project, Reclamation may 

require that all plans and specifications 

be signed and sealed by a professional 

engineer licensed by the State in which 

the work is proposed. 

II. Changes to the Right of Use 

Application Form and Its Instructions 

We changed the form and its 

instructions to comply with proposed 

revisions to 43 CFR part 429. The name 

of the form is now ‘‘Use Authorization 

Application’’ and ‘‘right-of-use’’ is 

replaced with ‘‘use authorization’’ in the 

form and instructions. We expanded the 

examples in the instructions of 

proposed uses for which you may seek 

permission. The instructions reflect the 

reduction of the application fee from 

$200 to $100. We made other changes to 

the form and the instructions to improve 

the readability and informationgathering. For instance, the form now 

requests day and evening phone 

numbers, instead of work and home 

numbers. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 1006–0003. 

Title: Right-of-Use Application. 

Form Number: Form 7–2540. 

Frequency: Each time a right-of-use is 

requested. 

Respondents: Individuals, 

corporations, companies, and State and 

local entities who want to use 

Reclamation lands, facilities, or 

waterbodies. 

Estimated Annual Total Number of 

Respondents: 500. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1. 

Estimated Total Number of Annual 

Responses: 500. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 1,000 hours. 

Estimated Completion Time Per 

Respondent: 2 hours. 

IV. Request for Comments 

We invite your comments on: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of our functions, including 

whether the information will have 

practical use; 

(b) the accuracy of our burden 

estimate for the proposed collection of 

information; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and 

(d) ways to minimize the burden of 

the information collection on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

We will summarize all comments 

received regarding this notice. We will 

publish that summary in the Federal 

Register when the information 

collection request is submitted to OMB 

for review and approval. 

Before including your address, 

telephone number, e-mail address, or 

other personal identifying information 

in your comment, you should be aware 

that your entire comment (including 

your personal identifying information) 

may be made publicly available at any 

time. While you can ask us in your 

comment to withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, we cannot guarantee that we 

will be able to do so. 

Dated: September 17, 2008. 

Roseann Gonzales, 

Policy and Program Services, Denver Office. 

[FR Doc. E8–22916 Filed 9–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–647] 

In the Matter of Certain Hand-Held 

Meat Tenderizers; Notice of Decision 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Terminating the Investigation Based 

on the Withdrawal of the Complaint 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 6) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the investigation based on 

the withdrawal of the complaint. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark B. Rees, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3116. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 8, 

2008, the Commission instituted this 

investigation based on the complaint, as 

supplemented, of Jaccard Corporation of 

Orchard Park, New York (‘‘Jaccard’’), 

alleging violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain hand-held meat tenderizers by 

reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 1,172,879 

and also by reason of infringement of 

trade dress. 73 FR 27846 (May 14, 2008). 

The respondents are Keystone 

Manufacturing, Inc. of Buffalo, New 

York and Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. of Old 

Bethpage, New York. 73 FR 41117 (July 

17, 2008). 

On August 26, 2008, Jaccard moved to 

withdraw its complaint and terminate 

the investigation as to all respondents 

‘‘without prejudice.’’ Respondents 

objected on the ground that the 

termination should be ‘‘with prejudice.’’ 

The investigative attorney argued that 

the investigation should be terminated 

based on the withdrawal of the 

complaint without styling the 

termination as either with or without 

prejudice. The ALJ agreed and therefore 

granted the termination without stating 

that it is ‘‘with prejudice’’ or ‘‘without 

prejudice.’’ No petitions for review of 

this ID were filed. The Commission has 

determined not to review this ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and section 

210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). 

Issued: September 24, 2008. 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 190 / Tuesday, September 30, 2008 / Notices 56867 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–22862 Filed 9–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Exelon Nuclear Texas Holdings, LLC; 

Notice of Receipt and Availability of 

Application for a Combined License 

On September 2, 2008, Exelon 

Nuclear Texas Holdings, LLC filed with 

the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC, the Commission) 

pursuant to Section 103 of the Atomic 

Energy Act and Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 52, 

‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals 

for Nuclear Power Plants,’’ an 

application for a combined license 

(COL) for two economic simplified 

boiling water reactor (ESBWR) nuclear 

power plants, to be located in Victoria 

County, Texas. The reactors are to be 

identified as Victoria County Station, 

Units 1 and 2. 

An applicant may seek a COL in 

accordance with Subpart C of 10 CFR 

Part 52. The information submitted by 

the applicant includes certain 

administrative information such as 

financial qualifications submitted 

pursuant to [10 CFR 52.77], as well as 

technical information submitted 

pursuant to [10 CFR 52.79]. 

Subsequent Federal Register notices 

will address the acceptability of the 

tendered COL application for docketing 

and provisions for participation of the 

public in the COL review process. 

A copy of the application is available 

for public inspection at the 

Commission’s Public Document Room 

(PDR), located at One White Flint North, 

Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 

Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, 

Maryland, and via the Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management 

System (ADAMS) Public Electronic 

Reading Room on the Internet at the 

NRC Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/adams.html. The cover 

letter ADAMS accession number is 

ML082540469. Future publicly available 

documents related to the application 

will also be posted in ADAMS. Persons 

who do not have access to ADAMS, or 

who encounter problems in accessing 

the documents located in ADAMS, 

should contact the NRC Public 

Document Room staff by telephone at 

1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or 

by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. The 

application is also available at http:// 

www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/ 

col.html. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day 

of September, 2008. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mark E. Tonacci, 

Senior Project Manager, ESBWR/ABWR 

Projects Branch 2, Division of New Reactor 

Licensing, Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. E8–22909 Filed 9–29–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 40–3400, License No. P–4001 

(Expired), R–230 (Expired)] 

Salmon River Uranium Development 

Site; Notice of Completion of 

Remediation at Salmon River Uranium 

Development Site, Near North Fork, ID 

ACTION: Notice of completion of 

remediation at the Salmon River 

Uranium Development Site, near North 

Fork, Idaho. 

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is noticing the 

completion of remediation activities at 

the Salmon River Uranium 

Development Site, near North Fork, 

Idaho. 

Background: The U.S. Atomic Energy 

Commission (AEC) issued Source 

Material License P–4001 to Salmon 

River Uranium Development, Inc. 

(SRUD) on October 10, 1958. This 

license authorized SRUD to possess and 

transfer source material. On March 30, 

1959, the AEC issued Source Material 

License No. R–0230 to SRUD. This 

license authorized the receipt and 

possession of source material for 

processing. Source Material License No. 

R–0230 expired on June 30, 1959 and 

Source Material License No. P–4001 

expired on October 31, 1959. 

Both uranium and thorium ores were 

processed at the site. Processing of 

source material occurred at two separate 

times, the late-1950s and the late-1970s. 

Processing operations were conducted 

in the late-1950s in accordance with the 

AEC licenses. During the late-1970s, 

pilot plant operations were conducted at 

the site to determine the viability of 

experimental ore processing techniques. 

The SRUD site was placed on the 

NRC’s Site Decommissioning 

Management Plan (SDMP) list in 1994. 

In May 2001, NRC staff visited the 

SRUD site and identified thorium 

contamination in the form of partially 

processed ore. In 2003, the NRC and the 

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and 

Education conducted scoping surveys of 

the site. During 2004 and 2005, NRC 

staff worked with the Idaho Department 

of Environmental Quality and the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

to establish an approach for remediation 

of the site. 

EPA agreed to perform remediation 

activities at the SRUD site in accordance 

with the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601(14) 

and (33). A Removal Action Work Plan 

(ADAMS No. ML072880344), which 

specified its step-by-step process for 

conducting cleanup activities at the 

SRUD site, was developed by the EPA 

and approved by the NRC. 

The EPA’s Removal Action Work Plan 

included the removal and disposal of 

hazardous chemical and radiological 

contaminants that may pose a threat to 

workers, public health and welfare, and 

the environment. EPA’s radiological 

release criteria was based on a 

recreational use scenario for the site. 

Implementation of the EPA’s work 

plan began on October 23, 2007, and 

was completed on June 3, 2008. 

Contaminated waste material above the 

unrestricted release criteria was shipped 

to licensed disposal sites. EPA’s work 

activities summary report is 

documented in the Final Removal 

Action Report, dated September 12, 

2008 (ADAMS No. ML082590288). 

The NRC staff conducted 

confirmatory radiological surveys of site 

structures and land areas and collected 

soil samples for analysis by the NRC’s 

independent laboratory contractor to 

verify results obtained by EPA. 

Confirmatory surveys consisted of 

surface scans for alpha, beta and gamma 

radiation, direct measurements for total 

alpha and beta activity, collection and 

analysis of soil samples for thorium and 

uranium, and collection of smear 

samples for determining removable 

radioactivity levels. The survey 

information and sample results are 

documented in Inspection Reports 040– 

03400/07–01 (ADAMS No. 

ML080320117) and 040–03400/08–01 

(ADAMS No. ML082180190). The NRC 

performed an independent dose 

assessment using the recreational 

scenario employed by the EPA to 

evaluate the EPA’s cleanup criteria and 

evaluate the condition of the SRUD site. 

Based on the considerations discussed 

above, the Commission has concluded 

that: (1) Radioactive material above 

release limits has been properly 

disposed; (2) reasonable effort has been 

made to eliminate residual radioactive 

contamination; and (3) FSSs and 

associated documentation demonstrate 

that the site is suitable for unrestricted 

release in accordance with the criteria 

in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. Therefore, 


ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES