alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: July 18, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02594-RPM

DALE GROSS, Alison L. Ruttenberg

Plaintiff,

v.

GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer; Kristin A. Ruiz

IAN SWEENEY, Community Parole Officer;

JENNIFER DUNCAN, Community Parole Officer;

ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board;

ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board;

DENISE BALAZIC, Member of the Parole Board;

PATRICIA BAN WAAK, Member of the Parole Board;

JOHN O’DELL, Member of the Parole Board;

MICHAEL ANDERSON, Member of the Parole Board;

REBECCA OAKES, Member of the Parole Board;

JOHN DAVIS, President of RSA, Inc.; Merideth A. Munro

JOHN DOES, Numbers 1-2, unknown officers of RSA Inc.;

WALTER T. SIMON, President of Progressive Therapy Systems PC;

JOHN DOES, Numbers 3-4, unknown officers of Progressive Therapy Systems PC;

FREDERICK E. TOLSON, President Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC;

JOHN DOES, Number 5-6, unknown officers of Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC;

GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program,

Inc.; and

JOHN DOES, Number 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment

Program, Inc.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motion to Dismiss

2:28 p.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks and states its understanding of the case.

Statements by Ms. Ruttenberg.

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 25 Filed 07/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

July 18, 2012

11-cv-02594-RPM

Argument by Ms. Ruiz.

ORDERED: State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Prisoner Complaint [7], is denied. 

Argument by Ms. Munro.

Argument by Ms. Ruttenberg.

ORDERED: Motion to Dismiss by Defendant John Davis [19], is granted.

Defendant John Davis is dismissed.

2:55 p.m. Court in recess. 

Hearing concluded. Total time: 27 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 25 Filed 07/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00376-WJM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. EXECUTIVE RECYCLING, INC.,

2. BRANDON RICHTER, and

3. TOR OLSON,

Defendants.

 

ORDER

 

 

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Executive Recycling, Inc., and

Brandon Richter’s Renewed Motion for Release of Grand Jury Transcripts filed

December 19, 2011 (ECF No. 71), and Defendant, Tor Olson’s Notice of Joinder filed

December 20, 2011 (ECF No. 72). The Court having reviewed the Motion and the

Jointer Notice hereby ORDERS as follows:

The Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(I) it is ORDERED that a copy of the transcript of the testimony

given before the grand jury and related exhibits, be disclosed to the attorneys for each

Defendant for preparation for trial. It is FURTHER ORDERED that:

1. Defense counsel is to make only such copies as are necessary to prepare

a defense of this criminal case;

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 73 Filed 12/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

2. Defense counsel is to keep a written record concerning how many copies

were made, to whom those copies were delivered, and the date of

delivery, and that defense counsel is to deliver a copy of this Order

allowing disclosure with these materials;

3. Defense counsel is to provide Defendants Brandon Richter and Tor Olson

with reasonable access to the grand jury materials, but that defense

counsel is not to allow the Defendants to retain copies of any grand jury

materials;

4. No officer, director or employee of Defendant Executive Recycling, Inc.,

other than the individual Defendants herein, may be permitted to view any

grand jury materials without prior leave of Court which will be granted only

for good cause shown;

5. No person, other than defense counsel, is to make any copy of the grand

jury materials for any purpose; and

6. At the conclusion of the case in this Court, by entry of the Court’s

judgment, defense counsel is to collect all such copies and return them to

the Government within ten days.

Dated this 20th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 73 Filed 12/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8050-8051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Chem Coast, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Chem Coast, Inc., as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Chem Coast, Inc., 11820 North H Street, Laporte, TX 77571, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c1f1e0c52101d1e140d3c18140f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b7b6a4fab8b5b6bca594b0bca7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Chem Coast, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on March 19, 2007. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for March 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.


[[Page 8051]]


    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-2404 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RICHARD E. WETZEL

ATTORNEY AT LAW

1411 WEST AVENUE, SUITE 100 AUSTIN, TX 78701 (512) 469- 7943

Board Certified Criminal Law (512) 474-5594 - fax And Criminal Appellate Law by wetzel_law @1411west.com The Texas Board of Legal Specialization www.TexasCriminalAppealsLawyer.com

August 28, 2015

Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547 Austin, TX

78711-2547

Re: Crayton v. State, No. 03-14-00570- CR , in the Third Court of Appeals

Dear Clerk Kyle:

I am in receipt of your notice of August 27, 2015, indicating argument and submission in the above on October 7, 2015, at 1:30 pm. I will be present to argue on behalf of Mr. Crayton. I have sent a copy of this letter to counsel for the State, ACDA Clayten Hearre ll at hearrc@co.comal.tx.us

Th ank you for your attention and cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Richard E. Wetzel

Richard E. Wetzel Attorney at Law ACCEPTED
03-14-00570-CR

6696760
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/28/2015 10:56:09 AM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                       706
<INVENTORY>                                      2,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,210
<PP&E>                                          43,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,141
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,385
<SALES>                                         21,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,337
<CGS>                                            6,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,506
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      24,764,000
<SECURITIES>                                33,781,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,717,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (500,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 88,149,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           189,881,000
<PP&E>                                      85,179,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,342,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             229,718,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,638,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       285,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 177,220,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               229,718,000
<SALES>                                    504,206,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           504,206,000
<CGS>                                      368,688,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              368,688,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               289,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             39,456,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,007,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,449,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                25,449,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH 

CARL GENBERG, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STEVEN S. PORTER, 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

 In light of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 77], filed April 16, 2012, 

Defendant Marc Redlich’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 33], filed January 17, 2012 is 

DENIED AS MOOT; Defendant Jeffrey Sperber’s et al Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 34], 

filed January 17, 2012 is DENIED AS MOOT; and Defendant Albert Bautista’s Motion to 

Dismiss [ECF No. 45], filed February 9, 2012 is DENIED AS MOOT. 

Dated: April 18, 2012 

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 80 Filed 04/18/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (see File No. 333-17883, effective December 31, 1996 and File No.
333-119664, effective October 12, 2004) of our report dated March 31, 2010, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Photonic Products Group,
Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Holtz
Rubenstein Reminick LLP


New York,
New York


March 31,
2010
March 10, 2000

Mr. S. Richard Averette
President
Precision Southeast, Inc.
P.O. Box 1405
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29578


Envirometrics, Inc.
9229 University Boulevard
Charleston, SC  29401

     Re: 65,875 Shares of Series B Preferred Stock of  Envirometrics,  Inc. (the
"Company") Held By S. Richard Averette

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to our Agreement of June 30, 1998, (the  "Agreement,"  Paragraphs 10-24
of which are fully incorporated  herein by reference and ratified and reaffirmed
in their  entirety by the  undersigned),  we hereby  notify you of our intent to
convert the  above-referenced  shares of Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Stock")
to  Envirometrics  Common Stock (the  "Common  Stock") at a ratio of 5 shares of
Common Stock for one share of Preferred Stock.  Kindly effect this conversion on
the tenth day  following  your receipt of this notice or as soon  thereafter  as
practicable.

We are enclosing  herewith any Certificate(s) we hold representing the Preferred
Stock. If you are holding any  Certificate(s)  representing the Preferred Stock,
you are hereby  instructed  to cancel same upon the issuance of the Common Stock
to us.

With regard to any dividends which have accrued on the Preferred  Stock, you are
hereby  instructed  to issue  Common  Stock to us in lieu of such  accruals at a
price of $0.40 per  share.  We  understand  that no  fractional  shares  will be
issued, and shares will be rounded off to the nearest whole number.

We  represent  that we have  familiarized  ourselves  with  the  affairs  of the
Company,  and we are  aware of the  Agreement  for the  Exchange  of Stock  (the
"Catapult  Agreement")  between  the  Company and The  Catapult  Group,  Inc. of
Atlanta,  GA and that the Company  intends to effect a split of the Common Stock
prior to the Closing  thereof at a ratio of one new share of Common  Stock being
issued for every ten shares then  outstanding;  and,  further,  that we have had
sufficient opportunity to have the Catapult Agreement reviewed by counsel of our
choice and are fully familiar with the terms thereof.

Sincerely yours,
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of World Health Alternatives, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard E. McDonald, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Richard E. McDonald

Richard E. McDonald

President, Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer, Chairman

of the Board of Directors



April 28, 2004
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

JENNIFER SUZANNE ADKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

UNPUBLISHED

February 20, 2018

v No. 337745

Presque Isle Circuit Court

Family Division

DAVID LEE PIECHAN, LC No. 15-084025-DS

Defendant-Appellee.

AFTER REMAND

Before: M. J. KELLY, P.J., and RONAYNE KRAUSE and BOONSTRA, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We remanded this case to the trial court for a best-interest determination concerning 

plaintiff’s request to change the existing custody order so as to grant her “sole” physical and 

legal custody of the parties’ two minor children.

1

 On remand, the trial court conducted a twoday evidentiary hearing and thereafter issued an order in part granting plaintiff “primary” 

physical and legal custody. Plaintiff thereafter filed a supplemental brief in this Court raising 

additional issues.

Except as set forth in this opinion, we affirm the trial court’s post-remand order. But

given the trial court’s determination to change the previously-existing joint legal custody 

arrangement (which we affirm), we remand for the ministerial correction of the order to insert 

the word “sole” before the term “legal custody,” in order to avoid potential future ambiguity. 

See Shulik v Richards, 273 Mich App 320, 328; 729 NW2d 533 (2006). We also vacate the 

portion of the trial court’s order forbidding plaintiff from moving more than 100 miles from the 

children’s current legal residence at the time of the initial custody order, because this portion of 

the order in effect restricts plaintiff, with regard to moving the children’s domicile, as though she 

 1 See Adkins v Piechan, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued 

November 21, 2017 (Docket No. 337745), and Adkins v Piechan, unpublished order of the Court 

of Appeals, issued November 21, 2017 (Docket No. 337745).
-2-

possessed joint legal custody of the children rather than sole legal custody. See MCL 722.31(1), 

(2), see also Brausch v Brausch, 283 Mich App 339, 349; 770 NW2d 77 (2009). With regard to 

plaintiff’s remaining claims of error, they are either moot or unripe, and we decline to address 

them in the first instance. See City of Huntington Woods v Detroit, 279 Mich App 603, 615-616; 

761 NW2d 127 (2008).

Vacated in part and remanded for ministerial correction of order. Affirmed in all other 

respects. We do not retain jurisdiction.

/s/ Michael J. Kelly

/s/ Amy Ronayne Krause

/s/ Mark T. Boonstra
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6357

ANTHONY HALL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:10-cv-00300-RGD-FBS)

Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, Assistant 

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 21. LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND PARTNERSHIPS OF THE REGISTRANT.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

SUBSIDIARY                                       STATE OR COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION ORGANIZATION
----------                                       ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
Clayton Homes, Inc.                                                Delaware
CMH Manufacturing, Inc.                                            Tennessee
CMH Homes, Inc.                                                    Tennessee
Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, Inc.                                Tennessee
Clayton-Vanderbilt, Inc.                                           Arizona
Vanderbilt Property and Casualty Insurance Co., LTD                British Virgin Islands
CMH Insurance Agency, Inc.                                         Tennessee
CMH Parks, Inc.                                                    Tennessee
CMH Capital, Inc.                                                  Delaware
Vanderbilt SPC, Inc.                                               Delaware
CMH Services, Inc.                                                 Tennessee
CMH of KY, Inc.                                                    Kentucky
HomeFirst Agency, Inc.                                             Delaware
Vanderbilt Life and Casualty Insurance Co., LTD                    British Virgin Islands
Eastern States Life Insurance Co.                                  Turks & Caicos Islands
Midland States Life Insurance Co.                                  Turks & Caicos Islands
Clayton SPC, Inc.                                                  Tennessee
Clayton Commercial Buildings                                       Tennessee
CMH Hodgenville, Inc.                                              Tennessee

PARTNERSHIP

Redwood Partners Limited                                           Colorado
CMH Management, LP                                                 Tennessee

</TABLE>



                                       17