alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>       
               This schedule  contains Summary Financial  Information  extracted
               from the Balance Sheet and Income  Statement for the six months
               ended December 31, 1998 for Mobius Management Systems,  Inc. and
               is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
               Statements.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                            0001025148       
<NAME>                                           MOBIUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       USD
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.0
<CASH>                                           44,434
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                        580
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 65,641
<PP&E>                                            6,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25,116
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              2
<OTHER-SE>                                       49,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     82,693
<SALES>                                          34,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 34,861
<CGS>                                             3,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    21,069           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,620
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.14
        


</TABLE>
#### Whitfield *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 25308

Decided May 15, 1935.)

*Mr. Malcolm E. Molner*and *Mr. Morton M. Stotter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank Z. Shapiro,*director of law, *Mr. Michael*
      *544
      *A. Picciano, Mr. Stephen Gobozy*and *Mr. J. J. P. Corrigan,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, O. J., Stephenson, Williams and Day, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1122 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1122

 To improve the calculation of highway mileage to medium and large hub 
                   airports, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2007

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To improve the calculation of highway mileage to medium and large hub 
                   airports, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mapping Airport Proximity Act'' or 
the ``MAP Act''.

SEC. 2. CALCULATION OF HIGHWAY MILEAGE TO MEDIUM AND LARGE HUB 
              AIRPORTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 41731 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Calculation of Highway Mileage to Medium and Large Hub 
Airports.--
            ``(1) In general.--In any determination under this 
        subchapter of compensation or eligibility for compensation for 
        essential air service based on the highway mileage of an 
        eligible place from the nearest medium hub airport or large hub 
        airport, the highway mileage shall be that of the most commonly 
        used route, as identified under paragraph (2).
            ``(2) Most commonly used route.--The Secretary of 
        Transportation shall identify the most commonly used route 
        between an eligible place and the nearest medium hub airport or 
        large hub airport by--
                    ``(A) consulting with the Governor or a designee of 
                the Governor in the State in which the eligible place 
                is located; and
                    ``(B) considering the certification of the Governor 
                or a designee of the Governor as to the most commonly 
                used route.
            ``(3) Applicability.--This subsection shall apply only to 
        eligible places in the 48 contiguous States and the District of 
        Columbia.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 409 of Vision 100--Century of 
Aviation Reauthorization Act (Public Law 108-176; 49 U.S.C. 41731 note) 
is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 32 Filed 03/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
#### Marie Jeanne VERRET v. Harry BOURG.

No. 2395.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1942.

C. A. Blanchard, of Donaldsonville, for appellant.

Robt. B. Butler, Jr., of Houma, for appel-lee.

LeBLANC, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the opinion this day handed down in the companion case of Esse Blanchard v. Harry Bourg, 8 So.2d 807, the judgment appealed from in this case is hereby affirmed at the costs of the appellant herein.

DORE and OTT, JJ., concur.
#### BEELER v. ORANGE STATE OIL CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without .opinion.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6357** 

ANTHONY HALL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00300

- RGD

- FBS )

Submitted : September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Anthony Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard , Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealab ility. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisone r satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 33 6

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slac k , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Case 1:11-cv-02598-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02598-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02598-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amscan Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Gerald C. Rittenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Michael A. Correale, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                         /s/ GERALD C. RITTENBERG
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                   Chief Executive Officer



                                       /s/ MICHAEL A. CORREALE
                                  ----------------------------------
                                  Michael A. Correale
                                  Chief Financial Officer


November 14, 2003
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 16, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60225 Summary Calendar
RUBEN ABASTILLAS OGELSBY, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 027 343

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ruben Abastillas Ogelsby petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA determined that Ogelsby was removable from the United States because he was an alien who had committed an aggravated felony. Ogelsby maintains that the Immigration and Nationalization Service (INS) was equitably estopped from denying him citizenship because the actions of an INS clerk prevented him from obtaining citizenship. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that an alien is deportable because he has committed an aggravated felony.2

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). Ogelsby does not dispute the BIA’s determination that he has committed an aggravated felony, and his equitable estoppel claim attacking the BIA’s finding that he is an alien fails. See Moosa v. INS , 171 F.3d 994, 1003 (5th Cir. 1999). Consequently, Ogelsby’s petition for review is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
#### JOSEPH McKEON, APPELLANT, v. THE FOUNDATION COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 20, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the appellant, *Peter L.*Hughes, *Jr.*

For the respondent, *John W. Taylor.*

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 11

*For reversal*— None.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6417

WAYNE ANTHONY BROOKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-98-3074-PJM)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Anthony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Brooks’ notice of appeal is timely only as to the February

3 and March 4 orders.

2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Anthony Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See Brooks v. Corcoran,

No. CA-98-3074-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 3 & Mar. 4, 1999).* We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Natural Resources Conservation Service 

# AGENCY:

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of proposed changes in the Virginia NRCS State Technical Guide for review and comment. 

# SUMMARY:

It has been determined by the NRCS State Conservationist for Virginia that changes must be made in the NRCS State Technical Guide specifically in practice standards: #578, Stream Crossing; #574, Spring Development; #561, Heavy Use Area protection; #575, Animal Trails and Walkways; and #560, Access Road. These practices will be used to plan and install conservation practices on cropland, pastureland, woodland, and wildlife land. 

# DATES:

Comments will be received for a 30-day period commencing with the date of this publication. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Inquire in writing to John A. Bricker, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1606 Santa Rosa Road, Suite 209, Richmond, Virginia 23229-5014; Telephone number (804) 287-1691; Fax number (804) 287-1737. Copies of the practice standards will be made available upon written request to the address shown above or on the Virginia NRCS Web site:                         *http://www.va.nrcs.usda.gov/​technical/​draftstandards.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after enactment of the law to NRCS State technical guides used to carry out highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days, the NRCS in Virginia will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. Following that period, a determination will be made by the NRCS in Virginia regarding disposition of those comments and a final determination of change will be made to the subject standards. 

Dated: January 23, 2008. 

John A. Bricker, 

State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Richmond, Virginia.

 [FR Doc. E8-2321 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted), the undersigned, Charles J. Drake, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the “Periodic
Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED:
            December 20, 2010/S/ Charles J. DrakeCharles
      J. DrakeChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer
#### The State, ex rel. O ’Dell et al., *v.*Allen, Judge.

(No. 25033

Decided December 5, 1934.)

*Messrs. Lease <& Lease, Mr. Eldon H. Young*and *Mr. Roy Warren Roof,*for relators.

*Mr. Harry I. Kaylor,*for respondent.

It appearing to the court that no further pleading has been filed herein by relators as permitted in the judgment of this court entered on demurrer to the petition October 24, 1934 *(State, ex rel. O’Dell,*v. *Allen, Judge,*128 Ohio St., 566), it is now ordered and *152adjudged that the writ prayed for be, and the same hereby is, denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Williams, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
  Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
  2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003
  (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
  indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1 | . | The Report
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  |   |                                                                                                                                                                     
|2 | . | The information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 14, 2003 | /s/ Lutz Klingmann          
|---------------------- | ----------------------------
|                       | Lutz Klingmann              
|                       | President                   
|                       |                             
|Dated: August 14, 2003 | /s/ Keith Gainey            
|                       | Keith Gainey                
|                       | Principal Accounting Officer

---
815 A.2d 955

#### IN THE MATTER OF JON CHRISTIAN SAJOUS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

February 21, 2003.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court in DRB 02-178, recommending that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to *Rule*1:20-14, JON CHRISTIAN SAJOUS, formerly of HEMPSTEAD, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, be disbarred, respondent having been disbarred in the State of New York for his criminal conviction of one count of criminal solicitation in the fourth degree, a class A misdemeanor, in violation of Section 100.05(1) of the Penal Law of the State of New York;

And JON CHRISTIAN SAJOUS having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JON CHRISTIAN SAJOUS be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*442ORDERED that JON CHRISTIAN SAJOUS be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.