alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Tear Drop
Golf Company Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  999
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        22,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                          1,451
<INVENTORY>                                          10,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     33,140
<PP&E>                                                5,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                        1,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       44,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                39,497
<BONDS>                                              24,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 52
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         44,580
<SALES>                                              37,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     37,590
<CGS>                                                20,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        20,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     18,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        239
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.45)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB

ALVIN MOSCH,

PATRICIA C. MOSCH,

DAVID K. MOSCH,

Each Individually and dba Mosch Mining Company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN HENRY, aka John T. Henry, aka John L. Henry,

UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, and

any one claiming by or through any of the named persons,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a document [Docket No. 102] filed by

defendant John Henry. The Court construes the document to be a motion to dismiss

and request for default judgment against all plaintiffs. See Docket No. 102 at 3. 

The filing lacks a proper caption. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a); D.C.COLO.LCivR

10.1J (“The caption format shall be as set forth in Appendix E.”); see also Fed. R. Civ.

P. 7(b)(2) (“The rules governing captions and other matters of form in pleadings apply

to motions and other papers.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (requiring that all pleadings have,

inter alia, a title). Mr. Henry’s motion also lacks a proper signature block, see Fed. R.

Civ. P. 11(a); D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1K, and is not entirely legible. See

D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1G (“All papers and signatures shall be legible.”). Consequently,

the Court will strike the motion. 

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 104 Filed 09/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

On August 28, 2012, the Court struck a previous filing by Mr. Henry for these and

other reasons. See Docket No. 98. Furthermore, in both that order and an August 27,

2012 order, the Court noted that many of Mr. Henry’s previous filings in this case

violated the Local Rules of this District. If Mr. Henry persists in violating the applicable

rules and the Court’s orders, the Court may consider whether, in addition to striking

non-compliant filings, additional sanctions against Mr. Henry might be in order.

Although the Local Rules do not require filings to be typewritten in “pro se

cases,” see D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1D, the Court will order Mr. Henry to show cause why

his future filings should not be typewritten due to Mr. Henry’s repeated filing of illegible

handwritten documents and the fact that he is capable of submitting typewritten

documents. See, e.g., Docket No. 97.

For the foregoing reasons, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Henry’s motion to dismiss and for default judgment against

plaintiffs [Docket No. 102] is STRICKEN. Future violations of the applicable rules may

subject Mr. Henry to additional sanctions. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before September 19, 2012, Mr. Henry shall show cause

why his future filings should not be typewritten.

DATED September 5, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 104 Filed 09/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 17

- 5326

_____________________________ S HANNON C ASTRO , Appellant /Cross

- Appellee ,

v. J OSE C ASTRO , Appellee /Cross

- Appellant

.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Darlene F. Dickey , Judge

. January 25, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________2 H. E. Ellis, Jr., of Staples, Ellis + Associates, P

. A

. , Pensacola , for Appellant /Cross

- Appellee. R. Stan Peeler of Peeler Law Firm, PLLC, Pensacola , for Appellee /Cross

- Appellant

.
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02518-LTB Document 3 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
No. 85251 

# F EE

„

. be SEP i 9 2.022 reAe:. DEP !CLERK

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA fib I U-17:1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

NONA TOBIN, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;AND THE HONORABLE JESSICA K. PETERSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Res22_ndents. ORDER DENYING PETITION

Thisis anoriginalpro sepetitionfor a writ ofprohibition and/or mandamus challenging district court orders in a civil action. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170;NRS 34.330;Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (explaining that writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and that petitioners bear the burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted). Even when an appeal is not immediately available because the challenged order is interlocutoryin nature, thefactthatthe order mayultimatelybechallenged on appeal from a finaljudgment generally precludes writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 225, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.1

1We note that petitioner complains of various rulings and actions taken by the district court in this case, includingthat it allowed a nonparty to participate in the proceedings, but she failed to name any of the otherParraguirre Hardesty Stiglich

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge Nona Tobin Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA I,)17,\ parties to the district court case, or the purported nonparty, as real parties

in interest to this writ proceeding, and her September 13, 2022, proof of service does not indicate that they were served. See NRAP 21(a)(1) & (2). 2
NO. 07-06-0345-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 23, 2006

______________________________

JEFFREY D. CALVERT, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;

NO. 2575; HONORABLE RON ENNS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jeffery D. Calvert, attempts to appeal from the denial of a Motion for

Nunc Pro Tunc. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. 

Appellant was convicted of Aggravated Sexual Assault on October 10, 1994, and

assessed court costs as part of sentencing. On November 3, 2005, the trial court issued

an Inmate Trust Account Order to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice ordering that

the assessed court costs be paid from appellant’s inmate trust account. In May of 2006,

appellant filed a Motion for Correction of the Record Nunc Pro Tunc contending that the
2

trial court erred in deducting the court costs from his inmate trust account. On July 26,

2006, the trial court wrote a letter declining appellant’s request to correct the record.

Subsequently, appellant appealed the trial court’s denial of his motion for nunc pro tunc.

 The denial of a motion nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Allen v. State,

20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex.App.–Texarkana 2000, no pet.); See also State v. Ross, 953

S.W.2d 748, 755 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). Therefore, we must dismiss this appeal for want

of jurisdiction. 

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of 24Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2008

|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw                     
|                                        
|Kirk M. Warshaw
 Chief Financial Officer

A signed
original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER OF
JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH APRIL 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           3,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  112,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,389)
<INVENTORY>                                     58,743
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,797
<PP&E>                                         112,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                (55,094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,875
<BONDS>                                        532,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                           984
<OTHER-SE>                                   (332,649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,786
<SALES>                                        107,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,003
<CGS>                                           53,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,823)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,737)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,737)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 24(a)



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the Anuhco, Inc. 1992 Incentive
Stock Plan, File No. 33-51494, the American Carriers, Inc. 1983 Incentive Stock
Option Plan, File No. 2-86915, and the Stock Option Agreement by and between
Anuhco, Inc. and C. Ted McCarter, effective May 31, 1995, File No. 33-62553, of
our report dated February 18, 1997 on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Anuhco, Inc. as of December 31,
1996 and for the two years then ended, which report is incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form  10-K.




                                    /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                    COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.




Kansas City, Missouri

April 25, 1997
Case 1:11-po-00040-GJR Document 27 Filed 09/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-po-00040-GJR Document 27 Filed 09/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
812 A.2d 362

#### IN THE MATTER OF JUAN A. FRANCO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

January 9, 2003.

ORDER

JUAN A. FRANCO of ROSELLE PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JUAN A. FRANCO is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JUAN A. FRANCO pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02555-LTB

ANDRE L. GARLINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KIT CARSON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY/CCA,

WARDEN VANCE EVERETTE, KCCC/CCA, and

UM TAMERA COOPER, KCCC/CCA,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Plaintiff’s request for a refund of the money he paid to the Court as an initial

partial filing fee, which he makes in a letter to the Court filed on December 14, 2011,

(Doc. # 10) is DENIED.

Dated: December 15, 2011

 

Case 1:11-cv-02555-LTB Document 11 Filed 12/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58276-58277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation Of Previous Announcement: [73 FR 55571, 
September 25, 2008].

[[Page 58277]]


Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: Monday, September 29, 
2008 at 2 p.m.

Change in the meeting: Cancellation of Meeting.
    The Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday, September 29, 2008 was 
cancelled.
    For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 1, 2008,
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-23579 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495;

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR WARRANT FOR ARREST OF PROPERTY IN REM - 

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495

Plaintiff has instituted the in rem action herein and requested issuance of process. It

appears to the Court from the Verified Complaint filed herein that the Court has jurisdiction over

the defendant property, and it appears, for the reasons and causes set forth in the Verified

Complaint, that there is probable cause to believe the defendant property is subject to a decree of

forfeiture, and that a Warrant for Arrest of the defendant 2008 Toyota Highlander,

VIN # JTEES42A182076495 should enter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND DECREED that a Warrant for Arrest of Property

In Rem for the defendant 2008 Toyota Highlander VIN # JTEES42A182076495

shall issue as prayed for and that the Internal Revenue Service and/or any other duly authorized

law enforcement officer is directed to arrest and seize the defendant 2008 Toyota Highlander

VIN # JTEES42A182076495 as soon as practicable, and to use whatever means may be

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 8 filed 08/15/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
2

appropriate to protect and maintain it in your custody until further order of this Court;

THAT the Internal Revenue Service and/or any other duly authorized law enforcement

officer shall promptly return the Warrant to the Court; and 

THAT pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or

Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States shall post notice on an official

internet government site for at least 30 consecutive days, stating that all persons claiming or

asserting an interest in the defendant property must file their Claims with the Clerk of this Court

pursuant to Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset

Forfeiture Actions no later than 60 days after the first day of publication on an official internet

government forfeiture site, and shall serve and file their Answers to the Verified Complaint

within twenty-one (21) days after the filing of their Claims with the Office of the Clerk, United

States District Court for the District of Colorado, with a copy sent to Special Attorney Richard L.

Hathaway, United States Attorney's Office, 444 S.E. Quincy, Suite 290, Topeka, Kansas.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 15th day of August, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/Craig B. Shaffer 

Craig B. Shaffer

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 8 filed 08/15/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Balance Sheet as of June 22, 1997,
and the related Statement of Earnings for the six months ended June
22, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-22-1997
<CASH>                                              41
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         42
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   474
<PP&E>                                           1,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                     796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              273
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,459
<SALES>                                            853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   853
<CGS>                                              781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     46
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 27
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        27
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>