IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02523-REB-CBS

BRITTANY THURMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY ARTHUR PETERSON, individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer

and as an Employee and/or agent of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Jefferson

County, and the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force,

SERGEANT DAVID HOOVER, individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer

and as an Employee and/or agent of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Jefferson

County, and the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force,

JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, in its capacity as the Employer of Deputy

Arthur Peterson, as an agent and/or independent contractor for Jefferson County and/or

as an agent, independent contractor/or employer of the Jefferson County Auto Theft

Task Force,

JEFFERSON COUNTY in its capacity as the employer of Deputy Arthur Peterson, as a

governmental entity, and/or as an agent, independent contractor or employer of the

Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force,

LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its capacity as the employer of Sergeant

David Hoover, and as an agent and/or independent contractor or the City of Lakewood

and the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force,

CITY OF LAKEWOOD, in its capacity as the employer of Sergeant David Hoover, as a

governmental entity and as an agent/or employer of the Jefferson County Auto Theft

Task Force, 

JEFFERSON COUNTY AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE, in its capacity as a governmental

entity and as the employer of Arthur Peterson, and David Hoover, and

JOHN DOES 1-10, whose names and identities and culpability in the instant matter are

yet unknown, individually and in their capacity as governmental officers or employees;

peace officers; and/or agents of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office; the Lakewood

Police Department; the City of Lakewood; the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force

and/or the State of Colorado.

Defendants.

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER

Blackburn, J.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e), D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.3, and D.C.COLO.LCivR

43.1, the court enters this Trial Preparation Conference Order.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That in order to resolve pretrial issues implicating Fed.R.Evid. 702, the

following procedural protocol shall be used:

 a. That expert reports shall conform in substance to the requirements of

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) and shall contain and include the following:

1. a complete statement of each expert opinion to be expressed

and the bases and reasons therefor; 

2. the facts, data, and other information considered by the witness

in forming each expert opinion; 

3. any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for each

expert opinion; 

4. the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications

authored by the witness within the preceding ten years, stated in a curriculum vitae

(“c.v.”); 

5. the compensation to be paid the expert for the study and

testimony; and 

6. a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as

an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years;

b. That all motions raising issues under Fed.R.Evid. 702 as codified and

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9
3

construed shall be filed by August 21, 2013, and marshaled thereafter as prescribed by

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C.; 

c. That for each putative expert witness with respect to whom the movant

objects for any reason, the movant shall provide the following:

1. whether the movant contends that the testimony of the expert is

unnecessary or irrelevant; and if so, why;

2. whether the movant objects to the qualifications of the witness;

and if so, why (stated in detail); and

3. whether the movant objects to any opinion to be offered by the

expert; and if so:

a. which opinion; and

b. the specific basis and authority for any objection stated

and presented in terms of Fed.R.Evid. 401 and/or 702(a), (b), (c), or (d), i.e., whether

the objection impugns the relevancy of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the

sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, whether the objection

impugns the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion,

or whether the objection impugns how the expert has applied the principles and

methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion; and

d. That for each putative expert witness whose necessity, qualifications, or

opinions are opposed by the movant, the party offering the expert shall provide in

response to the motion the following:

1. a c.v. for the expert;

2. a statement of each opinion to be offered by the expert that is

opposed by the movant; and

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9
4

3. the relevance and bases for each allegedly objectionable

statement to be offered by the expert, including

a. the facts or data on which the expert relied in support of

the opinion made the focus and subject of objection;

b. the principles and methods on which the expert relied in

support of the opinion made the focus and subject of objection; and

c. how the expert has applied the principles and methods

reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion made the focus and subject of

objection;

2. That trial by jury shall commence January 6, 2014, at 8:30 a.m., in courtroom

A1001, located on the 10th Floor North, of the Alfred A. Arraj, United States Courthouse

Annex, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294, at which trial all parties shall appear in

person without further notice, order, or subpoena;

3. That the court reserves eight (8) days for trial:

• Monday, January 6, 2014, through Thursday, January 9, 2014; and

• Monday, January 13, 2014, through Thursday, January 16, 2014;

4. That counsel and any pro se party shall appear in courtroom A1001 on the first

day of trial at 8:00 a.m., to review and discuss with the courtroom deputy clerk and the

court, if necessary, any final details, arrangements, or requirements concerning the trial;

5. That a combined Trial Preparation Conference and Final Pretrial

Conference (conference) shall commence on December 20, 2013, at 3:00 p.m., in

courtroom A1001;

6. That the proposed Pretrial Order, submitted pursuant to District Court ECF

Procedures V.5.1, shall be presented for the approval of the court no later than seven

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9
5

(7) days before the final pretrial conference, i.e. by December 13, 2013;

7. That lead counsel and any pro se party shall attend the Conference;

8. That for use and consideration during the conference, the parties shall

prepare and submit a proposed final pretrial order in the time, manner, and form

prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.3 and the “Instructions Final Pretrial Order” to Local

Rules of Practice - Forms

http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/CourtOperations/RulesProcedures/Forms.aspx; except

that the proposed final pretrial order under section “7. EXHIBITS”shall not require the

parties to list the exhibits to be offered by each party as otherwise required under

subsection “a” (See instead, paragraph 8, infra.), and shall provide under subsection “b”

that copies of exhibits must be provided to opposing counsel or any pro se party no later

than 45 days before trial and that objections to the exhibits must be served by personal

delivery, electronic mail, or facsimile no later than 30 days before trial;

9. That at the outset of the Conference, the parties shall submit one Parties’ Joint

Exhibit List on the form required by the court (an original for the court with copies for the

courtroom deputy clerk, the court reporter, and all other parties) and in addition to the

information required to be submitted under section “6. WITNESSES” of the final pretrial

order, each party shall submit on the Witness List form required by the court (an original

for the court with copies for the courtroom deputy clerk and all other parties) a “will call”

witness list enumerating the name and address (city or county and state only) of each

witness that will be called and a “may call” witness list enumerating the name and

address (city or county and state only) of each witness that may be called; provided,

furthermore, that the “will call” witness list constitutes a representation on which the

court and every other party may rely that the “will call” witnesses listed will be present

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9
6

and available to testify during trial;

10. That before commencement of jury selection, the parties shall submit to the

courtroom deputy clerk the exhibits identified in their joint exhibit list (a set of original

exhibits for use by the witnesses and copies for the court and all other parties);

11. That at the Conference the parties shall be prepared to review and discuss,

inter alia, the following:

a. stipulated and proposed jury instructions and verdict forms;

b. voir dire questions;

c. the jury selection process and the use of juror questionnaires;

d. identification of all persons permitted to be seated at each party’s table;

e. the pronunciation of problematic party’s and witness’ names;

f. the names or monikers that may be used when referring to a party or a

witness;

g. identification of “will call” and “may call” witnesses;

h. use of deposition testimony:

1. designation of specific testimony by page and line; and

2. identification of the person selected to read deposition answers;

i. use of video depositions:

1. resolution of objections;

2. pretrial redaction, if necessary; and

3. arrangements for necessary equipment to broadcast the

deposition;

j. issues concerning witnesses and exhibits;

k. the allocation of trial time between the parties;

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9
1

 The court has audio, video, audio-visual, evidentiary presentation, and other special equipment

that may be used by the parties. A listing of available equipment can be found on the District Court’s

website at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx under “Courtroom Technology Manual

for Attorneys.” Arrangements for training on courtroom technology must be made with the courtroom

deputy clerk, Nel Steffens, at 303-335-2090 at least 14 days before trial. Notify the courtroom deputy clerk

no later than fourteen (14) days before the date and time you need such equipment or need your own

equipment to be brought through security for use in the courtroom

7

l. the admission of stipulated exhibits or exhibits about which there are no

objections;

m. timing of publication, if any, of trial exhibits to the jury;

n. anticipated evidentiary issues;

o. the necessity for cautionary or limiting instructions; 

p. requests or requirement for trial briefs;

q. exemptions from the order of sequestration of witnesses;

r. security precautions, requirements, or issues;

s. training on the use of courtroom technology; and

t. transporting and bringing equipment, models, props, or other property

into the courthouse and courtroom for use during trial;1

12. That each side shall be permitted voir dire examination not to exceed 15

minutes following voir dire examination by the court, but shall not reiterate questions

previously propounded by the court or another party;

13. That pending further court order, the jurors shall not be sequestered before

deliberations;

14. That trial witnesses subject to sequestration under Fed.R.Evid. 615 shall be

sequestered by order entered sua sponte immediately before opening statements;

15. That opening statements shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes per party;

16. That the court will not engage in the examination of any witness, except to

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9
8

eschew plain error;

17. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard III.B.4.b., each party shall have

available at trial a set of exhibits for the court, the courtroom deputy clerk, opposing

counsel (one set per party), and any pro se party;

18. That objections made in the presence or hearing of the jury, i.e., so-called

“speaking” objections, shall be stated as succinctly as practicable and supported by

recitation of apposite authority when possible; however, neither counsel nor a pro se

party shall speechify an objection in the presence or hearing of the jury [See

Fed.R.Evid. 103(d)];

19. That unless interrupted by the court, in marshaling motions or objections

during trial, the following sequential protocol shall be observed: objection, response,

reply, ruling;

20. That to eliminate or minimize bench or sidebar conferences, each party shall

be responsible to inform the courtroom deputy clerk by the conclusion of a trial day

about any issue which should be considered before commencing trial on the next

scheduled day of trial and at the outset of a trial day about any issue which should be

considered at the conclusion of that trial day;

21. That to facilitate preparation, marshaling, and consideration of proposed jury

instructions and verdict forms, the parties shall identify and enumerate each individual

jury instruction in the heading or title as specified in REB Civ. Practice Standard V.C.4.;

provided, furthermore, the parties shall similarly identify and enumerate all proposed

verdict forms and special interrogatories;

22. That closing argument shall be limited to forty-five (45) minutes total for each

party; and

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9
9

23. That for additional information about courtroom protocol, courtroom

technology and training, trial preparation, transport of items into the courthouse and

courtroom, or submission of trial exhibits, the courtroom deputy clerk, Nel Steffens, at

303-335-2090 should be contacted.

Dated January 16, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 66 Filed 01/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9