alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ernest C. Sechrest, Jr., Petitioner, against Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21, Town of Oyster Bay, Nassau County, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

January 16, 1957.

*Alex Rosenthal & Louis Orfan*for petitioner.

*Kendrich C. Smith*for Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21, Town of Oyster Bay, respondent.

*LeRoy Van Nostrand, Jr.,*for John W. Chisholm, respondent.

Marcus G. Christ, J.

The petitioner avails himself of the provisions of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and seeks to be reinstated as a high school principal. The respondents, before answering, move to dismiss the petition and in support of the motion submit affidavits of an additional fact not appearing in the petition.

The motion must be made under section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act. It is in the nature of a demurrer and the petition must stand or fall by the strength of its own allegations which are, for the purposes of the motion, deemed to be true. Proof of additional facts by affidavit is not permitted upon such a motion *(Matter of Mopes*v. *Swezey,*199 Misc. 997, affd. 278 App. Div. 959; *Matter of Felice*v. *Swezey,*278 App. Div. 958).

In other respects the petition is valid and if uncontroverted *558states good grounds for relief. It alleges in paragraph 25 that petitioner was recommended by the district superintendent to be high school principal. It shows by Exhibit *“*F ” petitioner’s notice of appointment by the board and his acceptance. It is alleged that he acted as principal for three years and was paid by the board in that capacity. The petition alleges that his services were discontinued without giving him the notice required by section 3013 of the Education Law. If these allegations are supported by the evidence, petitioner has been deprived of a substantial right.

Accordingly, respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition are denied. The respondents may serve answers within 10 days after service upon them of the order to be entered hereon, with notice of entry, so that the matter can be determined upon full papers or, if required, a trial of the issues.

Submit order.
#### In the Matter of Crystal Roxy Lynn D., a Child Alleged to be Abused. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Marguerite D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Ricky D., a Child Alleged to be Abused. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Marguerite D., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[744 NYS2d 488]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.), both dated March 3, 1999 (one as to each child), as, upon two fact-finding orders of the same court, both dated February 6, 1998 (one as to each child), made after a hearing, determined that she had abused her daughter Crystal Roxy Lynn and derivatively abused her son Ricky. The appeals from the orders of disposition bring up for review the fact-finding orders.

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner carried its burden of proving by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the mother abused her daughter Crystal Roxy Lynn *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [e] [i]; § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Michael R.,*228 AD2d 684). That evidence included the mother’s criminal conviction for attempted assault in the third degree of Crystal Roxy Lynn.

The mother’s conduct demonstrated such an impaired level of parental judgment so as to create a substantial risk of harm to any child in her care. Accordingly, the finding of derivative abuse as to her son Ricky was appropriate *(see Matter of Brian B.,*283 AD2d 424; *Matter of Khabira B.,*271 AD2d 606).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### Teresa F. ZOLLER, joined by her husband, Emil B. Zoller, Appellants, v. A. C. GRAY, trading and doing business as Gray Well and Pump Company, and Milton A. Wheeler and Martha C. Wheeler, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 19, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. AC08-161-000] 

Take notice that on September 30, 2008, Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC filed a response to the Chief Accountant's September 16, 2008, Data Request. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the                           ( print page 58579)                        Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 pm Eastern Time on October 22, 2008.                 

 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-23623 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  231,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,174
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        125,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,307
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   821
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,359
<INCOME-TAX>                                       595
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First National Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2009, I, M. Shane Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of First National Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of First National Corporation.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ M. Shane Bell                                   
|Date: March 25, 2010 |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          FIRST MANITOWOC BANCORP, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, the undersigned certify that the Annual Report of First Manitowoc Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. No
purchaser or seller of securities shall be entitled to rely on the foregoing
statement for any purpose, and the undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation
to update the foregoing statement except as required by law.



Date:  March 14, 2003                                 /s/ Thomas J. Bare
                                                      ------------------
                                                      Thomas J. Bare
                                                      Chief Executive Officer




Date:  March 14, 2003                                 /s/ Thomas J. Bare
                                                      ------------------
                                                      Thomas J. Bare
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 09-cr-39-01-SM

Salvador Williams

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial for a period of 30 days

(document no. 36) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the May trial period.

Defendant shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 26, 2009.

On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:09-cr-00039-SM Document 37 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: May 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM 

Jury Selection: May 19, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 13, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00039-SM Document 37 Filed 03/13/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      32.1











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.














/s/
      Mitchell Gross


Mitchell
      Gross


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      9,
      2006
Exhibit 31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification

I, Peter H. Jackson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intraware, Inc. certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the "registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



Dated
October 15, 2003

|/s/PETER H. JACKSONPeter H. Jackson President and Chief
Executive Officer of
Intraware, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
58718 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 7, 2008 / Notices 

you would like to have the TAP 

consider a written statement, please call 

1–888–912–1227 or 206–220–6096, or 

write to Dave Coffman, TAP Office, 915 

2nd Avenue, MS W–406, Seattle, WA 

98174. Due to limited conference lines, 

notification of intent to participate in 

the telephone conference call meeting 

must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. 

Coffman can be reached at 1–888–912– 

1227 or 206–220–6096, or you can 

contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. 

The agenda will include the following: 

Various IRS issues. 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E8–23659 Filed 10–6–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Open Meeting of the Wage & 

Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 

(Notices) Issue Committee of the 

Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Wage 

& Investment Reducing Taxpayer 

Burden (Notices) Issue Committee of the 

Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 

conducted via telephone conference 

call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 

soliciting public comments, ideas and 

suggestions on improving customer 

service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

DATES: The meeting will be held 

Wednesday, November 19, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sallie Chavez at 1–888–912–1227, or 

954–423–7979. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given pursuant to section 

10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 

that an open meeting of the Wage & 

Investment Reducing Taxpayer Burden 

(Notices) Issue Committee of the 

Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 

Wednesday, November 19, 2008, at 

12:30 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone 

conference call. If you would like to 

have the TAP consider a written 

statement, please call 1–888–912–1227 

or 954–423–7979, or write Sallie 

Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine 

Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 

33324. Due to limited conference lines, 

notification of intent to participate in 

the telephone conference call meeting 

must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. 

Chavez can be reached at 1–888–912– 

1227 or 954–423–7979, or post 

comments to the Web site: http:// 

www.improveirs.org. 

The agenda will include: Various IRS 

issues. 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. E8–23640 Filed 10–6–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Courtroom Deputy: Robert R. Keech

E.C.R./Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt

Date: September 11, 2013

Civil Action No: 11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT

AMERICAN WEB, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLOM CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Counsel:

Gregory C. Smith

Scott T. Rodgers

Jeffrey S. Roberts

Hearther Carson Perkins

COURTROOM MINUTES

MOTIONS HEARING

11:07 a.m. Court in Session

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL.

Court’s opening remarks.

Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 74], filed

August 31, 2012, is raised for argument.

11:11 a.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Perkins).

11:18 a.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

11:19 a.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Perkins).

Case 1:11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT Document 103 Filed 09/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 74], filed

August 31, 2012, is DENIED.

Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Order [ECF Doc. No. 97], filed April 2, 2013,

is raised for argument.

11:23 a.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

11:27 a.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Perkins).

ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification of Order [ECF Doc. No. 97], filed April 2, 2013,

is DENIED.

Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 75], filed August

31, 2013, is raised for argument.

11:32 a.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

12:00 p.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Perkins).

12:24 p.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

12:35 p.m. Argument by Defendant (Ms. Perkins).

ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 75], filed August

31, 2013, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

12:37 p.m. Court in Recess - HEARING CONCLUDED.

TOTAL TIME: 1:30

Case 1:11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT Document 103 Filed 09/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1396 

To authorize a major medical facility project to modernize inpatient wards 

at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Atlanta, Georgia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize a major medical facility project to modernize 

inpatient wards at the Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center in Atlanta, Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY 

4 PROJECT, ATLANTA, GEORGIA. 

5 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out a 

6 major medical facility project for modernization of inpa7 tient wards at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

8 Center, Atlanta, Georgia, in an amount not to exceed 

9 $20,534,000. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS