alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02606-LTB

MONTE SPRINGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 

Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order signed

by the Honorable Lewis T. Babcock on February 7, 2013, incorporated herein by

reference, it is

ORDERED that the Commissioner’s final order is REVERSED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for

further proceedings consistent with this order and judgment. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff,

Monte Springer, and against Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social

Security Administration.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 8th day of February, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

s/ Edward P. Butler

Edward P. Butler,

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02606-LTB Document 19 Filed 02/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Courtroom Deputy: Robert R. Keech

E.C.R./Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt

Date: October 2, 2013

Civil Action No: 11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT

AMERICAN WEB, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLOM CORPORATION, a Maryland

corporation, and

LLOYD S. STIRMER, an individual,

PETER O. ABELES, an individual,

JOHN DOE TRUSTEE(S) of the STIRMER

TRUST,

Defendants.

Counsel:

Gregory C. Smith

Scott T. Rodgers

Kieran A. Lasater

Jeffrey S. Roberts

Hearther Carson Perkins

COURTROOM MINUTES

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

10:09 a.m. Court in Session

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL.

Court’s opening remarks.

Stipulated Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 Motion for Entry of Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 105],

filed September 26, 2013, and Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Trial Date [ECF

Doc. No. 107], filed September 27, 2013, are raised for argument.

10:11 a.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

Case 1:11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT Document 117 Filed 10/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

10:19 a.m. Argument by Defendants (Ms. Perkins).

10:25 a.m. Argument by Plaintiff (Mr. Smith).

10:33 a.m. Argument by Defendants (Ms. Perkins).

ORDERED: Stipulated Fed.R.Civ.P. 58 Motion for Entry of Judgment [ECF Doc. No. 105],

filed September 26, 2013, is GRANTED.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Trial Date [ECF Doc. No. 107], filed September 27,

2013, is GRANTED.

ORDERED: 4-Day Bench Trial set to commence on Tuesday, November 5, 2013, at 9:00

a.m., is VACATED.

10:37 a.m. Discussion regarding additional discovery to be conducted in this matter.

ORDERED: Counsel shall contact Magistrate Judge Tafoya’s chambers to deal with

discovery matters.

ORDERED: Parties shall file a joint status report not later than Friday, January 3, 2014.

10:43 a.m. Discussion regarding attorneys’ fees issue.

ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file motion for attorneys fees and costs not later than Friday,

October 25, 2013.

10:47 a.m. Court in Recess - HEARING CONCLUDED.

TOTAL TIME: :38

Case 1:11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT Document 117 Filed 10/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1999 QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,259
<SECURITIES>                                    16,088
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,390
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,610
<PP&E>                                         164,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,383
<BONDS>                                         31,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,553
<SALES>                                          1,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,968
<CGS>                                            1,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 31 filed 01/10/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 31 filed 01/10/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131622 & (24) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131622 

 COA: 266310 
 Wayne CC: 99-006418-01

ERIC HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALMA ROSA NAVARRETE-PRADO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent. 

No. 15-73180 

Agency No. A070-121-516 

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2017**

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Alma Rosa Navarrete-Prado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reopen exclusion 

proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-73180 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 

F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Navarrete-Prado’s motion 

as untimely, where the motion was filed more than 15 years after the applicable 

regulatory deadline of September 30, 1996, and she did not establish any grounds 

for equitable tolling of the filing deadline. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1) (“A 

motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final 

administrative order of removal, deportation, or exclusion, or on or before 

September 30, 1996, whichever is later.”); Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 

1193 (9th Cir. 2001) (equitable tolling is applied in cases where despite all due 

diligence, the party invoking equitable tolling is unable to obtain vital information 

bearing on the existence of the claim (citation omitted)). In addition, NavarretePrado has not established grounds for equitable estoppel based on alleged IJ 

misconduct. See Socop-Gonzalez, 272 F.3d at 1184 (equitable estoppel requires a 

showing of affirmative misconduct—a “deliberate lie” or “pattern of false 

promises”—by a government actor). 

Navarrete-Prado’s contention that the agency erred in denying sua sponte 

reopening for failure to demonstrate exceptional circumstances does not raise a 

legal or constitutional error to invoke our jurisdiction. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 
3 15-73180 

F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016).

In light of these determinations, we do not reach Navarrete-Prado’s 

remaining contentions regarding her underlying 1993 exclusion proceedings and

her eligibility for adjustment of status.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

d0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

146658(12)

GEORGE C. BENTON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 146658

AGC: 0052-13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2013 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02613-DME-MEH 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

$782,893.49 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 

Defendant. 

DEFAULT AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States' Motion for Default 

and Final Order of Forfeiture as to defendant $782,893.49 in United States Currency, 

the Court having reviewed said Motion FINDS:

THAT the United States commenced this action in rem pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 981(a)(1)(C); 

THAT all known interested parties have been provided an opportunity to respond 

and that publication has been effected as required by Rule G(4) of the Supplemental

Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions; 

THAT after notice, neither potential claimant A Plus Billing, Inc., nor any other 

third parties, have filed a Claim or Answer as to defendant $782,893.49 in United States 

Currency as required by Rule G(5) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime 

Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions; 

Case 1:11-cv-02613-DME-MEH Document 11 Filed 03/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
2

THAT Entry of Default was entered by the Clerk of the Court on January 5, 2012 

(Doc. 9); 

THAT based upon the facts and verification set forth in the Verified Complaint, it 

appears by a preponderance of the evidence that there was reasonable cause for the 

seizure of defendant $782,893.49 in United States Currency, and a Certificate of 

Reasonable Cause is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. It further appears that 

there is cause to issue a forfeiture order under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C); 

THAT the facts and verifications as set forth in the Verified Complaint provide 

probable cause and an ample basis by a preponderance of the evidence for a final 

Judgment and Order of Forfeiture as to defendant $782,893.49 in United States 

Currency; 

THAT the Clerk of Court shall be directed to enter Judgment as to defendant 

$782,893.49 in United States Currency; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED: 

THAT default and forfeiture of defendant $782,893.49 in United States Currency, 

including all right, title, and interest is hereby entered in favor of the United States 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C); 

THAT the United States shall have full and legal title as to defendant 

$782,893.49 in United States Currency and may dispose of said property in accordance 

with law; 

Case 1:11-cv-02613-DME-MEH Document 11 Filed 03/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
3

THAT this Default and Final Order of Forfeiture shall serve as a Certificate of 

Reasonable Cause as to defendant $782,893.49 in United States Currency under 28 

U.S.C. § 2465; and 

THAT the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment as to defendant 

$782,893.49 in United States Currency. 

SO ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2012. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ David M. Ebel

__________________________ 

DAVID M. EBEL 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02613-DME-MEH Document 11 Filed 03/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program for disasters declared on or after October 1, 2008, will be increased.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 1, 2008, and applies to major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James A. Walke, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

44 CFR 206.48 provides that FEMA will adjust the statewide per capita impact indicator under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita impact indicator will be increased to $1.31 for all disasters declared on or after October 1, 2008.

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 5.4 percent for the 12-month period ended in August 2008. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor released the information on September 16, 2008.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Public Assistance Grants.

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E8-24066 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 17 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02578-PAB-KLM Document 17 Filed 10/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MAURICE SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 64 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### ALLEN v. SHAW.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### LEVINE v. Jack SCHAEFFER, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 99.1


                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANCES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert J. Keogh, state and attest that:

1.       I am the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Bankshares, Inc.(the
         "Registrant").

2.       I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. that

o        the Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of the Registrant for the year ended
         December 31, 2002, (the "periodic report") containing financial
         statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

o        the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.



Date:  March 26, 2003                      /s/ Robert J. Keogh
                                           --------------------------
                                           Robert J. Keogh
                                           President and Chief Executive
                                             Officer
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 247 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 247 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 247 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
Exhibit 23.5

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-138404 and No. 333-138404-01) on Form S-3 of HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I of our attestation report dated March 16, 2009 with respect to HSBC Electronic Data Processing (Philippines) Inc.’s  (the Company) assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in 1122(d)(4)(viii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation ABapplicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions secured by private label credit card receivables, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities.  Our attestation report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of HSBC Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 25, 2009
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 Statement - computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computations of Earnings per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                           For the Three Months             For the Six Months
                                               Ended June 30                   Ended June 30
                                      -------------------------------   ----------------------------
                                          1997                1996           1997           1996
                                      -----------         -----------    -----------     -----------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>                  <C>              <C>
 Net Earnings                         $ 3,715,000         $ 2,620,000    $ 6,910,000     $ 5,676,000
                                      ===========         ===========    ===========     ===========
 
Weighted average common
shares outstanding                     15,025,000          15,040,000     15,032,000      15,040,000
                                      ===========         ===========    ===========     ===========
 
Earnings per share of common stock    $       .25         $       .17    $       .46     $       .38
                                      ===========         ===========    ===========     ===========
 
</TABLE>
xhibit 32

|                        |      |                                |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: August 16,      2010 | By:  | /s/      Shi Huashan                |   |
|                        |      | Name:      Shi Huashan              |   |
|                        |      | Title:      Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                        |      |                                |   |

|    | By:  | /s/      Sharon Tang                      |   |
|--------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|         |      | Name:      Sharon Tang                    |   |
|         |      | Title:       Chief Financial Officer |   |
|         |      |                                      |   |

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending October 27, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAJJ BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 18C
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board Chair

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: SES Performance Review Board Chair.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair for 
the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all previously 
published lists of the PRB Chair.

DATES: Effective Date: This appointment is effective as of September 
22, 2008.

Sarah J. Bonilla,
Director, Office of Human Capital Management.
[FR Doc. E8-23846 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Sugarman et al. *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 25318

Decided May 1, 1935.)

*Mr. Ray T. Miller*and *Messrs. Silber S Soltz,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Frederick W. Frey,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error*dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Jones, J., not participating.
Order entered November 1 9 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01520

- CR

DARRYL RAYNARD GORDO N, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Tr ial Court Cause No. 30600

- 422



### O RDER

The State motion to extend the time for filing the State’s brief and to permit the late filing

of the brief is GRANTED . The State’s brief will be filed in the above cause.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD

JUSTICE