alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William S., Miraglia, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Photonic Products Group, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated Subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

 (b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 7, 2005

 
|   | /s/ William S. Miraglia |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | William S. Miraglia     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### In re ISOLAGEN, INC., SECURITIES & DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Ronald A. Gargiulo v. Isolagen, Inc., et al., E.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:05-4983 Gregory Newman v. Isolagen, Inc., et al., E.D. Pennsylvania, C.A. No. 2:05-5090 Elliot Lift, et al. v. Isolagen, Inc., et al., S.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:05-2887 Michael Cummiskey v. Isolagen, Inc., et al., S.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:05-3105 Richard Keene, etc. v. Frank M. DeLape, et al., S.D. Texas, C.A. No. 4:05-3441

No. 1741.

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

Feb. 23, 2006.

*1367Before WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman, JOHN F. KEENAN, D. LOWELL JENSEN, J. FREDERICK MOTZ, ROBERT L. MILLER, Jr., KATHRYN H. VRATIL and DAVID R. HANSEN, Judges of the Panel.

*TRANSFER ORDER*

WM. TERRELL HODGES, Chairman.

This litigation currently consists of three actions pending in the Southern District of Texas and two actions pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Defendant Isolagen, Inc. (Isolagen) moves the Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for an order centralizing this litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The motion is almost unopposed; there exists some disagreement regarding the selection of a transferee district, in that one proposed lead plaintiff applicant group1 prefers transfer of all actions to the Southern District of Texas.

On the basis of the papers filed and hearing session held, the Panel finds that these actions involve common questions of fact, and that centralization under Section 1407 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. These actions are putative class actions and a shareholder derivative action that share factual questions arising from alleged misrepresentations or omissions concerning Isolagen’s financial condition. Centralization under Section 1407 is necessary in order to .eliminate duplicative discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings (especially with respect to questions of class certification), and conserve the resources of the parties, their counsel and the judiciary. *See In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & “ERISA” Litigation,*196 F.Supp.2d 1375 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit.2002).

We conclude that the Eastern District of Pennsylvania is an appropriate transferee forum for this docket. Nearly all parties favor or do not oppose this choice. In addition, this district will likely provide a source of relevant documents and witnesses, inasmuch as Isolagen’s U.S. headquarters are currently located there.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the actions pending in the Southern District of Texas are transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Ronald L. Buckwalter for coordinated or consoli*1368dated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district.

1

. Massachusetts Laborers' Annuity and Pension Funds, Keith R. Malkin, Kimberly Wilson, Harvey Ellensweig and Elliot Lift.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Craig D. Gates, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 11, 2009



| |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  |                                      
| |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Craig D. Gates
| |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | Craig D. Gates                       
| |  |  |  |  |  |                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000766004
<NAME>                        Sbarro, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     usd

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   7-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-18-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         152907
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3542
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164445
<PP&E>                                         312826
<DEPRECIATION>                                 174429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32373
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       205
<OTHER-SE>                                     270284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   311744
<SALES>                                        179051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186007
<CGS>                                          36981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  86556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21203
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13146
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13146
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .64



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3

                                    HE 2002-1

                            Principal Distribution      Interest Distribution

Class AF-1A                      84,853,117.39               1,108,428.72
Class AF-1B                      76,307,262.79               1,772,833.67
Class A-2                                   --               2,579,384.20
Class A-3                                   --               2,966,517.50
Class A-4                                   --               2,496,952.50
Class A-5                                   --               1,745,159.20
Class A-6                                   --               2,441,766.70
Class A-7                        76,714,719.71               8,768,932.15
Class MF-1                                  --               1,952,932.50
Class MF-2                                  --               1,982,095.00
Class BF                                    --               1,601,413.30
Class AV                         71,977,151.96               2,399,801.33
Class MV-1                                  --                 279,561.50
Class MV-2                                  --                 218,858.05
Class BV                                    --                 336,730.20

Total  HE-2002-1                309,852,251.85              32,651,366.52

Pool Balance A/O 12/31/02                                  710,293,031.89

Delinquency A/O 12/31/02

31-59                                                       45,413,514.50
60-89                                                       15,067,981.43
90 +                                                        27,002,599.83
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH

ROY WAKE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SSC GREELEY CENTENNIAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability

company, and

SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability

company,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 1, 2012.

Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Designate Non Parties at Fault Pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-21-

111.5(3)(b) [filed July 31, 2012; docket #23] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with

D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, which states,

The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P.

12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the

motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with

opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving

party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the

specific efforts to comply with this rule. 

(emphasis added). The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully

with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo.

2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied

by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).

Case 1:11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH Document 25 Filed 08/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Joe JOHNSON v. CITY OF HUNTSVILLE.

8 Div. 130.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 21, 1935.

RICE, Judge.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                                              November 4, 1998



Mr. Michael J. Perik
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Learning Company, Inc.
One Athenaeum Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Dear Michael:

         Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated April 9, 1997
between The Learning Company, Inc. and you (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used and not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.

         This letter is to confirm the action of the Corporation's Compensation
Committee on October 22 with respect to the Agreement. Effective as of October
1, 1998, the Annual Base Salary in Section 2.1 has been changed to $750,000, and
the Bonus in Section 2.4 has been changed to $1,000,000.

         Please contact me if you have any questions.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       /s/ William H. Shupert, III
                                       ---------------------------
                                       William H. Shupert, III
                                       Sr. Vice President, Human Resources
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Heritage Organization, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2009 (the
“Report”), I, Vickie Walker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1) The
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the Company’s financial position and results of operations.




/s/
      Vickie WalkerChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer




April 13,
2009
# Chut Cherry J. determination whether withdrawal was warranted for an abuse of discretion, Molina V. State, 120 Nev. 185, 191, 87 P.3d 533, 538 (2004).

Even assuming, without deciding, that the doctrine of laches did not preclude consideration of Felix's motion, he is not entitled to relief because "Padilla does not have retroactive effect." Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. „ 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1105 (2013). We reject Felix's assertion that his case is not final because the instant motion is tantamount to a direct appeal. Moreover, the record does not demonstrate that Felix was affirmatively misadvised of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty

Douglas

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Law Offices of Anthony D. Guenther, Esq. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e
Order entered November 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01520-CR

DARRYL RAYNARD GORDON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 30600-422

ORDER

The State motion to extend the time for filing the State’s brief and to permit the late filing 

of the brief is GRANTED. The State’s brief will be filed in the above cause. 

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31                  Rule 13a-14(d) Certification

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Thomas G. Lehmann, a First Vice President of Washington Mutual
Mortgage Securities Corp., certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of periods
included  in the year  covered  by this  annual  report,  of  WASHINGTON  MUTUAL
MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-MS2;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement; and

     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:


Everhome Mortgage Company,  Downey Savings and Loan Assoc,  Citimortgage,  Inc.,
Flagstar Bank, FSB,  Geenpoint  Mortgage Company,  MidAmerica Bank, FSB, US Bank
Home Mortgage


Dated: March 29, 2005
                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann,
                                     First Vice President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0444

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NICOLE LEE HUNT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 6, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2024

03/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0444
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM














Board of Directors


Giga-tronics Incorporated


San Ramon, California

















We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-45476, 333-34719, 333-48889, 333-39403, 333-69688 and 333-135578 on Form S-8 of Giga-tronics Incorporated of our report dated May 24, 2010, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which report appears elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Giga-tronics Incorporated for the year ended March 27, 2010.














/s/ Perry-Smith LLP








San Francisco, California


May 24, 2010
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  August 10, 2009
    /s/ Jeffrey T. BentonJeffrey T. BentonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer 34
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  209,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,052
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                     925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         99,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   440
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    848
<INCOME-TAX>                                       378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       470
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>