alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                       |                | EXHIBIT 99(a) 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------
|HSBC Finance Corporation                                               |                |               
|Household Private Label Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-1 |                |               
|                                                                       |                |               
|Original Principal                                                     |                |               
|Class A                                                                | 400,000,000.00 |               
|Class B                                                                | 58,275,000.00  |               
|                                                                       |                |               
|Number of Bonds (000's)                                                |                |               
|Class A                                                                | 400,000        |               
|Class B                                                                | 58,275         |               
|                                                                       |                |               
|                                                                       |                |               
|                                                                       |                | 2004 Totals   
|                                                                       |                |               
|CLASS A                                                                |                |               
|Class A Principal Distributions                                        |                | 400,000,000.00
|Class A Interest Distributions                                         |                | 3,537,569.45  
|                                                                       |                |               
|                                                                       |                |               
|CLASS B                                                                |                |               
|Class B Principal Distributions                                        |                | 58,275,000.00 
|Class B Interest Distributions                                         |                | 638,323.71
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2015

No. 04-15-00344-CR

Juan Ruben Sanchez CERDA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-CRS-372

Honorable J.R. "Bobby" Flores, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due June 22, 2015; however, the court granted the 

reporter, Jessie Salazar, an extension of time until July 22, 2015 to file the record. Salazar has 

filed another motion for extension of time, asking for an additional twenty-one days to file the 

record.

We grant the motion and order Salazar to file the record by August 12, 2015. Salazar is 

advised that the court will not grant a further extension of time unless she (1) establishes there 

are extraordinary circumstances that prevent her from timely filing the record, (2) advises the 

court of what efforts have been expended to prepare the record and the status of completion, and 

(3) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the 

requested extended deadline. 

Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed,” TEX .R. APP. P. 35.3(c), we also order the clerk of this court to 

serve a copy of this order on the trial court.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 3/31/00
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      1,739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,518
<PP&E>                                           6,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,474
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,164
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,571
<SALES>                                         48,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,274
<CGS>                                           36,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (394)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Foothill Independent Bancorp:



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 21, 2005 on the consolidated financial statements of Foothill Independent Bancorp
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, included at Page 41 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, into Registration Statement No. 33-57586 on Form S-8
filed January 29, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-64584 on Form S-8 filed on June 17, 1993, and Registration Statement No. 33-83854 on Form S-3 filed September 12, 1994 (each of which was amended by post effective amendments filed on July 27,
2000) and Registration Statement No. 333-113206 filed on Form S-8 on March 2, 2004.



/s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLPVAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLPCertified Public Accountants




March 14, 2005

Rancho Cucamonga, California
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                     (In thousands except per share figures)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Year ended December 31,
                                                                  1996               1995               1994
                                                                  ----               ----               ----
<S>                                                               <C>                <C>                <C>
Primary
-------

Weighted average shares outstanding                               5,746              5,636              5,598

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents
      based on the treasury method                                  515                472                253

Effect of treasury shares purchased                                 (69)               -                  (75)

Effect of treasury shares issued                                      5                  7                -
                                                        ---------------    ---------------    ---------------
Total                                                             6,197              6,115              5,776

Net income                                                       $4,176             $3,148             $1,980
                                                        ===============    ===============    ===============
Net income per common share
                                                                  $0.67              $0.51              $0.34
                                                        ===============    ===============    ===============
Fully diluted
-------------

Weighted average shares outstanding                               5,746              5,636              5,598

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents
      based on the treasury method                                  583                574                357

Effect of treasury shares purchased                                 (69)               -                  (75)

Effect of treasury shares issued                                      5                  7                -
                                                        ---------------    ---------------    ---------------

Total                                                             6,265              6,217              5,880

Net income                                                       $4,176             $3,148             $1,980
                                                        ===============    ===============    ===============
Net income per common share                                       $0.67              $0.51              $0.34
                                                        ===============    ===============    ===============

</TABLE>
#### **Exhibit 32.2**

#### ** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code),the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation, (the “Company”) doeshereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) that:

 

1.           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 30, 2005 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |   /s/  R. Herbert Hampton |
|                       |   R.  Herbert Hampton |
|                       |   |
|                       |   Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

____________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Date: November 11, 2011

Courtroom Deputy: Geneva D. Mattei FTR BNB COURTROOM A401 

ALVIN MOSCH, Richard Garnett

PATRICIA C. MOSCH, and

DAVID K. MOSCH,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

JOHN HENRY, and Pro se

UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE Pro se

CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

COURTROOM MINUTES

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 9:31 a.m.

Appearances of counsel. 

Court’s opening remarks.

John Schlie informs the court that he will be entering his appearance for the defendants.

ORDERED: Mr. Schlie shall enter his appearance on or before November 18, 2011.

ORDERED: A Scheduling Conference is set for December 9, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

A proposed scheduling order shall be submitted on or before December 2,

2011.

ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to reconsider [doc. #29, filed 11/7/11 ] is denied for

reasons stated on the record.

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 32 Filed 11/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

Court in Recess: 9:44 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 00:13

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 32 Filed 11/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02536-PAB-MEH

ELAINE CALDERON, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE,

ANNE TAPP, and

MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 12, 2012.

For good cause shown, Defendants’ Amended Motion for Protective Order [filed March 2,

2012; docket #43] is granted. The proposed Protective Order, as modified by terms agreed to in

the parties’ briefing, is accepted and filed contemporaneously with this minute order.

Case 1:11-cv-02536-PAB-MEH Document 49 Filed 03/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Garnerville Holding Company, Inc., Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant. Garnerville Improvement Corporation, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 33051.)

(Claim No. 33052.)

Court of Claims,

March 14, 1957.

*Samuel Miller*for claimants.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Lawrence Wayne*of counsel), for defendant.

*612Sidney Squibb, J.

The State moves to dismiss these two claims, contending that the claims were not filed within the time provided by section 10 of the Court of Claims Act, i.e., two years.

It is not disputed that although notices of intention to file claims were filed on January 27, 1953, the claims were not filed until February 28, 1955, more than two years thereafter.

Claimants’ pleading in effect alleges continuing trespasses by the State arising out of its alleged interferences “ with the natural flow of the waters of a stream, and the diversion of the waters of the said stream so that the claimant is deprived of their use In paragraph 15, the pleading asks for “ temporary damages ” and sets forth monetary “ estimates ” of the respective damages for the several years of 1950, 1953 and 1954. Accordingly, portions of the respective claims are not barred by the Statute of Limitations relied on by the State. It follows in each case that the entire pleading is not destroyed by the infirmity asserted.

In Tripp’s valuable *“A*Guide To Motion Practice” (1949 ed.) at page 245, the learned author concisely sets forth the applicable rulings of our Court of Appeals and other appellate courts as follows: *“*12. Every intendment and fair inference is in favor of the pleading. *(Dyer*v. *Broadivay Central Bank,*252 N. Y. 430, 432.) If plaintiff is entitled to recover on any theory of the facts pleaded, the motion to dismiss for legal insufficiency must be denied. *(Abrams*v. *Allen,*297 N. Y. 52; *O’Neill Supply Co.*v. *Petroleum H. & P. Co.,*280 N. Y. 50; *Condon*v. *Associated Hospital Service of New York,*287 N. Y. 411, 414.) It must be denied, even if plaintiff cannot obtain all the relief sought, so long as he can obtain some relief. *(Steisel*v. *Cratzer,*272 App. Div. 673, * * *.) ”

Even though in each claim paragraph 16 alleges that the notice of intention was filed and a copy of said notice is annexed to and made a part thereof, the same can be disregarded in order that a part of the claim can survive. Lack of artistry in a pleading such as at bar cannot be a legal basis for dismissal here.

The Statute of Limitations bars most of the damages which claimants seek but not all thereof. Accordingly, these claims cannot be dismissed on this motion. Motion denied.
178 La. 113

#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. MITCHELL et al.

No. 32392.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 30, 1933.

Richard A. Dowling, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Nat W. Bond, City Atty., and Henry B. Curtis, Asst. City Atty., both of New Orleans, for appellee.

ROGERS, Justice.

The three defendants were charged in the First recorder’s court of the city of New Orleans with violating Ordinance No. 13974, C. S., amending Ordinance No. 1025, A. S., for the suppression and punishment of vagrancy in the municipality. Defendants were convicted, and each was sentenced to pay a fine of $10, or, in default of payment, to be imprisoned for a period of thirty days.

Defendants appealed, grounding their appeal on the alleged unconstitutionality of the ordinance under which they are being prosecuted. But the record does not show that the question was raised and determined in the court below, and, for that reason, the appellee, has moved to dismiss the appeal.

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. Under our settled jurisprudence, this court will not entertain an appeal based on the alleged unconstitutionality of a municipal ordinance, unless it clearly appears that the issue was presented and passed on in the court below. See authorities cited in City of New Orleans v. Dunlap (La. Sup.) 150 So. 847, this day decided.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal herein is dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00347-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ALFREDO MIRALDA-CABRERRA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 12, 2011 [Docket No. 12]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 3, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 3, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 13, 2011.
#### NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, for the Use and Benefit of Stanley GABBARD, by William A. Gabbard, His Next Friend.

No. 7765.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 8, 1937.

Milton A. Behrendt and Mason, Davidson & Mansfield, all of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Walter M. Nelson, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is, dismissed, pursuant to motion of appellant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02635-RPM

DEBRA A. TURNER,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE

OF COLORADO, and

RODNEY D. JOHNSON, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Grand County, also known

as the Grand County Sheriff’s Department and Sheriff’s Office, and in his individual

capacity,

Defendants.

Minute Order Entered by Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch:

s/M. V. Wentz

 Secretary

A status hearing is set for December 2, 2011, at 4:00 p.m. in the Conference

Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street,

Denver, Colorado.

DATED: November 21, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02635-RPM Document 17 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1