alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Burress, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39) and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from *4Vz*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant has failed to establish a prima facie showing that the prosecutor exercised his preemptory challenges in a purposefully discriminatory manner to exclude blacks from the jury in this case, where defendant was charged with the sale of drugs to an undercover police officer. *(See, Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79; *People v Jenkins,*145 AD2d 225, *mod*75 NY2d 550.) The People exercised only nine out of 15 peremptory challenges. While eight of these nine challenges were against black jurors, the prosecutor did *not*challenge eight black jurors. Of these eight, the defense challenged five, leaving three black persons on the jury.

While the prosecutor made several inappropriate comments during summation the court adequately " 'dissipated the prejudice by promptly and clearly advising the jury that the comments were improper and must be completely *826disregarded’ *(People v Wood,*66 NY2d 374, 381.) We note that the court immediately issued extensive curative instructions to the jury after each improper comment, until the entire summation was struck. At the time the court instructed the jury to only consider the evidence in the case and not the prosecutor’s summation.

We have reviewed defendant’s final argument that the trial court gave a favorable opinion of the Assistant District Attorney and denigrated defense counsel thereby undermining defendant’s right to effective counsel. *(People v De Jesus,*42 NY2d 519, 523-524.)

The court did not unduly or improperly inject himself into the proceedings or display a partiality to one side. The court’s role is not that of an observer. Rather, the court must keep the evidence within the confines of the issues *(People v Jamison,*47 NY2d 882; *People v Moulton,*43 NY2d 944). In this case the court intervened infrequently and did not exceed its supervisory role. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
|Skip to ContentRelease Date: December 9, 2004Release dates | 
 Coded tables | 
 Historical dataCurrent release | 
 Screen reader | 
 PDF (450 KB)
L.227 Investment in Bank Personal Trusts and Estates
   Billions of dollars; amounts outstanding end of period, not seasonally adjusted                                                                                                                         
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Description
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003   Q1
2003   Q2
2003   Q3
2003   Q4
2004   Q1
2004   Q2
2004   Q3
LineBank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	819.6
	877.0
	885.0
	932.4
	955.0
	961.9
	951.0
	1Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset
	1130.4
	1095.8
	960.7
	840.9
	819.6
	877.0
	885.0
	932.4
	955.0
	961.9
	951.0
	2
|
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Bank personal trusts and estates total assets asset                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Release dates | 
Coded tables | 
Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releasesHome | Economic research and
dataAccessibility | Contact Us Last update: December 9, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


         I, Matthew Richman, Chief Financial Officer of Front Porch Digital Inc.
(the  "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2003 of the  Registrant,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                               By: /s/ Matthew Richman
                                                   ----------------------
                                               Name: Matthew Richman
                                               Title: Chief Financial Officer

November 17, 2003

-------------------------

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Porch Digital Inc. and will be retained by Front Porch Digital
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-CR-00402-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. SHANE FRENCH,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER SETTING HEARING

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is set for a hearing on February 16, 2012 at

3:00 p.m. before the Magistrate Judge, 103 Sheppard Drive, Room 235, Durango, Colorado 81303

on the Probation Officer’s Request to Modify Conditions of Release.

Failure of the Defendant to appear on that date and time may result in a warrant being issued

for his arrest.

DATED: February 14, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00402-DW Document 35 Filed 02/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of DCB Financial Corp.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  March 30, 2010
    /s/ Jeffrey T. BentonJeffrey T. BentonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1450 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1450

    To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2007

  Mr. Kohl (for himself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing Assistance Council 
Authorization Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE TO HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL.

    (a) Use.--The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may 
provide financial assistance to the Housing Assistance Council for use 
by such Council to develop the ability and capacity of community-based 
housing development organizations to undertake community development 
and affordable housing projects and programs in rural areas. Assistance 
provided by the Secretary under this section may be used by the Housing 
Assistance Council for--
            (1) technical assistance, training, support, and advice to 
        develop the business and administrative capabilities of rural 
        community-based housing development organizations;
            (2) loans, grants, or other financial assistance to rural 
        community-based housing development organizations to carry out 
        community development and affordable housing activities for 
        low- and moderate-income families; and
            (3) such other activities as may be determined by the 
        Housing Assistance Council.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for financial assistance under this section for the 
Housing Assistance Council--
            (1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
            (2) $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, 
        2012, 2013, and 2014.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58032-58033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23511]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2006-24825; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-17-AD; 
Amendment 39-15623; AD 2008-16-05]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG 
(RRD) Dart 528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series Turboprop Engines; 
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting airworthiness directive (AD) 2008-16-05. 
That AD applies to RRD Dart 528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series 
turboprop engines. We published that AD in the Federal Register on July 
31, 2008 (73 FR 44630). The superseded AD number in paragraph (b) in 
the regulatory section is incorrect. This document corrects that 
superseded AD number. In all other respects, the original document 
remains the same.

DATES: Effective Date: Effective October 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#513b30223e3f7f28303f36113730307f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7812190b1716560119161f381e1919561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone (781) 238-7747; fax (781) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44630), we published 
a final rule AD, FR Doc, E8-17423, in the Federal Register. That AD 
applies to

[[Page 58033]]

RRD Dart 528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series turboprop engines. We 
need to make the following correction:


Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 44631, in the second column, in paragraph (b) of the 
regulatory section, ``2007-02-17'' is corrected to read ``2007-02-07''.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 29, 2008.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-23511 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of United Wisconsin GrainProducers, LLC (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Barb Bontrager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Barb Bontrager      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Barb Bontrager          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Dated:                  | March 15, 2007 |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

v. JOHN PAUL YUKNAVICH, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 359 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### Dunlap *v.*Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company, Appellant.

*Negligence*— Personal *injuries*— Excessive *damages*— Refusal *of new trial*— Appeals—Act *of May 20,1891, P. L. 101.*

The exceptional power conferred upon an appellate court by the Act of May 20, 1891, P. L. 101, to reverse the action of the lower court refusing a new trial, where it is alleged that the verdict was excessive, will be exercised only in cases of clear abuse of judicial discretion.

Argued Oct. 9, 1914.

Appeal, No. 54, Oct. T., 1914, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. Beaver Co., June T., 1912, No. 230, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Sophie Dunlap v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company.

Before Pell, C. J., Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschziskbr, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Holt, P. J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Verdict for plaintiff for $6,500 which the court subsequently reduced to $5,000, on which judgment was entered. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was in refusing a new trial.

*J. Sharp Wilson,*with him *Frank E. Reader,*for appellant.

*J. H. Cunningham,*with him *Anderson & Lamb,*for appellee.

January 2, 1915:

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff was injured by the derailment and overturning of the railway car in which she was riding as a passenger. Her injuries were painful and resulted in *231the permanent impairment of the use of her arm and hand. She recovered a verdict for $6,500 which was reduced by the filing of a remittitur to $5,000. There were no exceptions taken at the trial to'the admission or to the rejection of testimony or to the charge and the only assignment of error is to the refusal of the court to grant a new trial because the verdict was excessive. Whether the amount for which the judgment was entered exceeds the limit of just compensation we have not adequate means to determine. The learned trial judge on a review of the whole case made an order for the filing of a remittitur as a condition for the discharge of the rule for a new trial, which in his judgment did substantial justice between the parties.

The exceptional power conferred on an appellate court by the Act of May 20, 1891, P. L. 101, has been exercised by us only in Smith v. Times Publishing Company, 178 Pa. 481, decided six years after the passage of the act, and we have said in a line of cases, extending from Wolf v. Traction Co., 181 Pa. 399, to Hitz v. Railway Co., 245 Pa. 7, that it will not be exercised except in extreme cases where the injustice of allowing a verdict to stand is so manifest as to show a clear abuse of discretion by the court in which the case was tried.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 13


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
annual report of Sodexho Alliance, SA on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31,
2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Michel Landel and Sian Herbert-Jones each certifies that, to the best of
his or her knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Sodexho Alliance, SA.

Date: July 24, 2006


By:      /s/ Michel Landel
         --------------------------------------------
         Name:   Michel Landel
         Title:  Chief Executive Officer


By:      /s/ Sian Herbert-Jones
         --------------------------------------------
         Name:   Sian Herbert-Jones
         Title:  Chief Financial Officer
# German-American Day, 2008

For generations, German Americans have contributed to our Nation's identity, culture, and prosperity.  On German-American Day, we recognize the many Americans with German ancestry who helped make our country great, and we celebrate our strong friendship with Germany.

The people of Germany and the United States share important family and cultural ties, and millions of American citizens are of German descent.  Some of their forebears were among the first to settle Jamestown, and they and many others like them helped lay the foundation for our country, which has become the most prominent symbol of freedom in the world.  Many German Americans have shaped our way of life and added to our country's rich heritage.

In celebrating German-American Day, we honor generations of German Americans who came to our shores with dreams of opportunity and contributed to the greatness of our country.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2008, as German-American Day.  I encourage all Americans to celebrate the many contributions German Americans have made to our Nation's liberty and prosperity.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E8-23949

Billing code 3195-W9-P
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 18 filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amscan Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Gerald C. Rittenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Michael A. Correale, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


                                                     /s/ Michael A. Correale
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Michael A. Correale
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2006
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 8
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 249 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 8 of 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-0-2487-LTB-KLM

NICOLE BAROS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SENTRY INSURANCE, a mutual company,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER 

_______________________________________________________________________

Upon Defendant’s Response to Show Cause Order Regarding Diversity Jurisdiction

(Doc 9 - filed October 18, 2011), it is

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause (Doc 6) is DISCHARGED.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: October 19, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02487-LTB-KLM Document 10 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1