IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT

MARIA A. ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Consolidate [Docket No. 19] filed

by defendant Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. Veolia Transportation seeks an order

consolidating this case with a related case, Adams v. Veolia Transportation,

11-cv-02492-MSK-CBS, pending in this District before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. After

review of the pleadings in each of these cases, the Court concludes that consolidation

is appropriate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). 

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Maria Adams filed the complaint in this action on September 23, 2011. 

Plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against because of her sex in violation of

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and in

violation of the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (“EPA”). Plaintiff asserts that,

despite performing similar duties as her male co-workers, she received fewer benefits

because she is female. 

Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 01/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
2

In plaintiff’s related case, Adams v. Veolia Transportation,

11-cv-02492-MSK-CBS, also filed on September 23, 2011, plaintiff alleges that she was

demoted and discharged for having a personal relationship with a male co-worker in

violation of Title VII, claiming that no male manager engaged in a personal relationship

with a co-worker would have faced either a demotion or discharge. 

II. ANALYSIS

Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[i]f actions

before the court involve a common question of law or fact, the court may . . .

consolidate the actions.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). Pursuant to Local Rule 42.1, the

judge assigned to the lowest numbered case decides whether consolidation is

warranted. D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. The decision whether to consolidate actions

involving common questions of law or fact is committed to the sound discretion of the

district court. Shump v. Balka, 574 F.2d 1341, 1344 (10th Cir. 1978). The purpose of

Rule 42(a) is “to give the court broad discretion to decide how cases on its docket are to

be tried so that the business of the court may be dispatched with expedition and

economy while providing justice to the parties.” Breaux v. American Family Mut. Ins.

Co., 220 F.R.D. 366, 367 (D. Colo. 2004) (quoting 9 C. WRIGHT & A. MILLER, FEDERAL

PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 2381 at 427 (2nd ed. 1995)). Therefore, the Court will

consider both judicial economy and fairness to the parties in exercising its discretion

under Rule 42(a). See Harris v. Illinois-California Express, Inc., 687 F.2d 1361, 1368

(10th Cir. 1982). 

Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 01/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
3

Both of the cases in question involve the same parties, essentially the same

facts, and seek to answer the same question: whether the termination of plaintiff’s

employment with Veolia Transportation Services was the result of discrimination based

on sex. Additionally, the cases were filed on the same day, neither of the parties in the

cases objects to consolidation, and the present case is the lowest numbered case.

Therefore, because the cases involve common questions of law and fact, Adams v.

Veolia Transportation, 11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT, and Adams v. Veolia Transportation, 11-

cv-02492-MSK-CBS, shall be consolidated. 

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Defendant Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.’s Motion to

Consolidate [Docket No. 19] is GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1,

Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT and 11-cv-02492-MSK-CBS shall be

consolidated for all purposes. It is further

ORDERED that, as of the date of this Order, all future pleadings and other filings

shall be filed in this case only and shall be captioned as shown below:

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT

(Consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-cv-02492-PAB-KMT)

Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 01/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
4

DATED January 20, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 23 Filed 01/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4