alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Mitchell Gross
-------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2004
Order entered April 30, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01382-CV

STEVEN E. BROWN, Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-02170

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s April 26, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a reply 

brief. Appellant shall file his reply brief on or before Monday, June 3, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit  99.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Milacron Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company) for the period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge
and belief, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.)    the Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                           
|
| | 2.)    the information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company as of December 31, 2002.



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ RONALD D. BROWN

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Ronald D. Brown        
| | Chairman and           
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 20, 2003

| |     |                       
| | --- | ----------------------
| | By: | /s/ ROBERT P. LIENESCH

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | Robert P. Lienesch         
| | Vice President  Finance   
| | and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 20, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF ZAP POWER  SYSTEMS FOR THE NINE MONTHS  ENDED
         SEPTEMBER  30,  1997,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
         SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             129,385            
<SECURITIES>                                             0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                      217,596            
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (13,862)            
<INVENTORY>                                        270,151             
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   689,555             
<PP&E>                                             242,552              
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (102,352)            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     936,997              
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              560,974              
<BONDS>                                              8,067                  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0           
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,087,361            
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,738,266)         
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       936,997             
<SALES>                                          1,327,148             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,336,685             
<CGS>                                            1,035,096             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,110,762   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0                 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    (2,538)              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,217        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (831,390)      
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (831,390)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0       
<CHANGES>                                                0       
<NET-INCOME>                                      (831,390)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.37)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00         
                                                                      
                                                                      

</TABLE>
#### DEPARTMENT OF WILD LIFE AND FISHERIES v. THE TIMOTHY.

No. 2969.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 21, *1947.*

Harry P. Gamble, Sr., of New Orleans, for appellant.

Ellender & Wright, of Houma, for ap-pellee..

PER CURIAM.

The above case was set for hearing at Thibodaux, Louisiana, on November 6, 1947; and counsel for plaintiff and appellant and defendant and appellee were present. It was suggested by the Court that *623since the cause appeared to involve an amount exceeding $2,000, that it might be transferred to the Supreme Court; and counsel agreeing before the Court, were given time to prepare motions to that effect.

It now appearing that counsel for all parties litigant in this proceeding have joined in a written motion for the transfer of the appeal to the Supreme Court; the averment being made therein that the object in dispute exceeds in value $2,000; it is concluded that the appeal is one for consideration of the highest court of this State, and the motion will be granted. Succession of Wengert, 178 La. 1027, 152 So. 747; Snyder Wagon Company v. Campbell Ice Cream Company, 173 La. 467, 137 So. 855; General Motors Truck Company et al. v. Caddo Transfer *&*Warehouse Company, Inc., et al., La.App., 172 So. 178.

Accordingly, and pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, it is ordered that the appeal in this case be transferred to the Louisiana Supreme Court; that a period of 60 days is granted for the perfecting of the transfer, dating from the finality of this decree; and that on failure to make the transfer within that period, the appeal shall stand dismissed.

Appellant shall pay the cost of this appeal, and all other costs shall abide the final disposition of the case.
Case 1:11-mj-01152-KLM Document 8 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTEE

                                 August 11, 2000


Congress Financial Corporation (Central)
150 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2200
Chicago, Illinois  60606

      Re: Guarantee

      Please refer to (1) the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of January
20, 2000 (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to
time, the "Loan Agreement"; capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Loan Agreement), among
Congress Financial Corporation (Central) (the "Lender"), and TearDrop Golf
Company (the "Borrower") and (2) the Guarantee dated January 20, 2000 (the
"Guarantee"), by the undersigned in favor of Lender. Pursuant to that certain
Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of the date hereof among
Lender and Borrower (the "Amendment"), Lender has agreed to make certain
amendments to the Loan Agreement in accordance with the terms thereof.

      The undersigned hereby (i) acknowledges receipt of the Amendment, (ii)
acknowledges and reaffirms all of its obligations and undertakings under the
Guarantee and (iii) acknowledges and agrees that subsequent to, and taking into
account all of the terms and conditions of the Amendment, the Guarantee is and
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof.


                                           TOMMY ARMOUR GOLF COMPANY


                                           By:
                                              ---------------------------------
#### Clyde BLAKE v. STATE.

7 Div. 114.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 19-35.

RICE, Judge.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

I, R. Herbert Hampton, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/Aof Golden Cycle Gold Corporation:

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

 

Date: April 5, 2005

 

 
|   |   /s/ R. Herbert  Hampton |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |   R. Herbert  Hampton     |
|   |   Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: October 30, 2013

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02584-RPM

KEVIN STRINGER, William W. Muhr

RYAN O’NEILL, Marizza Plaz-Lopez

JOAQUIN MARTINEZ,

CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, and

WILLIAM LEGER III, individually and

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Scott A. Risner

 Defendant. 

 

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment

2:39 p.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks and statements regarding Orders entered in related case 

12-cv-01761-MSK-CBS.

Argument by Mr. Risner.

Argument by Mr. Muhr.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Ryan O’Neill [74], is

denied and a written order will be prepared and entered.

Mr. Risner states counsel Susan Ullman will be taking over as counsel for the defendant in this case and

all related case before this Court.

Discussion regarding remedy with respect to plaintiff O’Neill.

3:05 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 26 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02584-RPM Document 82 Filed 10/30/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 7**

 

**Computation of consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges**

 

The following table sets out the calculation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges (unaudited) for the periods indicated.

 

**STATUTORY FIGURES**

 
|                                                                          |       | **(in   millions of AUD except ratios)** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **30-Sep**                               | ** ** | **30-Sep** | ** ** | **30-Sep** | ** ** | **30-Sep** | ** ** | **30-Sep** |
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **2011**                                 | ** ** | **2010** | ** ** | **2009** | ** ** | **2008** | ** ** | **2007** |
|                                                                          |       |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income tax                                                      |       | 8,514                                    |   | 8,038 |   | 6,096 |   | 5,219 |   | 5,148 |
| Add fixed charges                                                             |       | 26,270                                   |   | 22,470 |   | 18,945 |   | 21,958 |   | 15,849 |
| Less minority interest   in subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges |       | (68)                                     |   | (66) |   | (71) |   | (73) |   | (67) |
| **Earnings   before tax and fixed charges**                                   |       | 34,716                                   |   | 30,442 |   | 24,970 |   | 27,104 |   | 20,930 |
|                                                                          |       |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                              |       | 26,102                                   |   | 22,309 |   | 18,800 |   | 21,859 |   | 15,762 |
| Portion of rent   estimated to represent interest expense                     |       | 168                                      |   | 161 |   | 145 |   | 99 |   | 87 |
| **Fixed   charges**                                                           |       | 26,270                                   |   | 22,470 |   | 18,945 |   | 21,958 |   | 15,849 |
|                                                                          |       |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| **Ratio   of earnings to fixed charges**                                      | ** ** | **1.32**                                 | ** ** | **1.35** | ** ** | **1.32** | ** ** | **1.23** | ** ** | **1.32** |

 

----
Case 1:11-cv-02552-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02552-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02552-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02552-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02489-CMA-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402

Date: July 20, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties: Counsel:

PGH INVESTMENT, L.P.,

Plaintiff,

Dean Elliot Richardson 

v.

COLORADO GROUP REALTY, LLC., et

al., 

Defendants.

George Roger Bock 

Kenneth L. Levinson 

Daniel Ray McCune

Gwen M. Rogers

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 10:03 a.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

The court addresses the parties regarding the plaintiff’s AMENDED COMPLAINT Verified

Third Amended Complaint for Direct and Derivative Reiief [sic] and Jury Demand against Jill

Brabec, Colorado Realty Group, LLC, Randall Hannaway, Holloway, Brabec & Karet, P.C.,

(Docket No. 38, filed on 7/15/2012) and the defendant’s MOTION to Strike #38 Amended

Complaint (Docket No. 43, filed on 7/19/2012).

Discussion between the court and Mr. Richardson regarding these filings, Rule 15(a) pertaining

to amending the complaint, Rule 12 pertaining to responses, Rule 16(b)(1)(b) pertaining to

amending the scheduling order, Rule 16(b) pertaining to the good cause standard, and the

purpose of extending the deadline to amend. 

Discussion between the court, Mr. Richardson, and Mr. McCune regarding the statute of

Case 1:11-cv-02489-CMA-CBS Document 45 Filed 07/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
limitations, possibly needing to retake depositions, discovery, Rule 804 and depositions, and

Rule 6(b)(1) pertaining to motions to extend time.

For reasons as stated on the record, 

ORDERED: The court STRIKES without prejudice the plaintiff's AMENDED

COMPLAINT Verified Third Amended Complaint for Direct and Derivative

Reiief [sic] and Jury Demand against Jill Brabec, Colorado Realty Group, LLC,

Randall Hannaway, Holloway, Brabec & Karet, P.C., (Docket No. 38, filed on

7/15/2012).

ORDERED: The court FINDS AS MOOT the defendant's MOTION to Strike #38 Amended

Complaint (Docket No. 43, filed on 7/19/2012). 

The court cites related case law pertaining to the filing of motions for leave to amend. 

Discussion regarding the impact that filing an amended complaint will have on the progress of

the case.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 10:33 a.m.

Total time in court: 00:30

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at

(303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case 1:11-cv-02489-CMA-CBS Document 45 Filed 07/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT32.1**

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

As an accompaniment tothe Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James L. Saner Sr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

•                    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

•                    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe periods presented.

This certification isbased on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faitheffort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officerserving the Company and its many constituencies.

This certification merelyaccompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed forpurposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for anypurpose other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
| Date: March 12, 2007     |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ James L.  Saner, Sr. |   |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB

THE WELLINGER FAMILY TRUST 1998,

JULIE WELLINGER, Trustee, and individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,

a Connecticut Insurance Company,

Defendant.

ORDER TO DISMISS CLAIM

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion To Dismiss

Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief (Doc. # 55). The Court, having read the motion and the

case file, hereby

ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief set forth in their Amended

Complaint (Doc. # 27) be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay her or its own

costs and attorney’s fees associated with the dismissal of said claim for relief.

DATED: February 05 , 2013

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB Document 56 Filed 02/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02590-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02590-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02590-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02590-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
#### BOROUGH OF EDGEWATER, PETITIONER, v. CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Argued October 1, 1946

Decided June 2, 1947.

Before Justices Parker, Donges and Eastwood.

For the petitioner, *Milton T. Lasher.*

For the respondent, *Winne & Bania.*

Per Curiam.

This is an application for a declaratory judgment. The situation presented is that Corn Products Eefining Company, a New Jersey corporation, owned a tract of about 26 acres in Edgewater, a borough of Bergen County, together with the building thereon and some personal property therein contained. In 1942 the realty was taken over by the national government in a statutory eminent domain proceeding, the details of which are of no present importance. At the time of that transfer, the property was subject to the annual tax *221for 1942. Under the law this tax liability is to be divided between former and new owner proportionately to the respective periods of ownership during the tax year. *R. S.*54 :A-56. The date of transfer of title was May 2d: so, for convenience of discussion, we treat the date as May 1st, and the period of Corn Products ownership as terminating with April 30th, and consisting of 4/12 or 1/3 of the taxing year. It follows, of course, that Corn Products was liable for 1/3 of the annual tax on the realty, and the whole tax on the personalty, which did not pass to the national government.

The realty tax for the year as finally settled amounted to ................ . $56,162.61

of which Corn Products owed for four months (1/3 of the tax year) $18,720.87

Corn Products also owed taxes on the personalty which did not pass to the national government, for the whole year, amounting to...... 5,666.36

Total tax liability of Corn Products Company .................. $24,387.23 Corn Products actually paid in all . $51,017.94

Over-payment by Corn Products Company ................ $26,630.71

Judgment for that amount will be entered accordingly.

Tf the tax liability of Corn Products be figured as including the two days in May, at $15.38 per day, the over-payment will be reduced by $30.76 and judgment go for $25,599.95, with interest.