alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60397-60398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Sherburne County, MN

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Terminate Tier I EIS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
Tier I Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process for proposed 
highway improvements to Trunk Highway (TH) 10 in Sherburne County, 
Minnesota is terminated. The original Notice of Intent for this Tier I 
EIS process was published in the Federal Register on July 28, 2003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Martin, Environmental Engineer, 
Federal Highway Administration, Galtier Plaza, Suite 500, 380 Jackson 
Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101,

[[Page 60398]]

Telephone (651) 291-6120; or Claudia Dumont, Project Manager, Minnesota 
Department of Transportation--District 3, 3725 12th Street North, St. 
Cloud, Minnesota 56303, Telephone (320) 223-6530; (651) 296-9930 TTY.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the Minnesota 
Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has terminated the Tier I EIS 
process begun in 2003 to address future transportation demand, safety 
problems, access management and interregional corridor status on TH 10 
from 1.0 mile east of Big Lake to 0.75 mile west of Big Lake, Sherburne 
County, Minnesota. The purpose of the Tier I EIS was to preserve right 
of way for the proposed highway improvement. The Scoping Decision 
Document for the project was approved by Mn/DOT on April 23, 2004. On 
June 18, 2008, Mn/DOT notified federal, state and local agencies; 
tribal governments; interested parties; and the public that work on the 
Tier I EIS was being discontinued due to a lack of identified funding 
for any of the build alternatives. Mn/DOT will proceed with 
implementing more affordable and timely safety improvements on existing 
TH 10. Therefore, the Tier I EIS for this project has been terminated.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: October 3, 2008.
Cheryl B. Martin,
Environmental Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, St. Paul, 
Minnesota.
 [FR Doc. E8-23988 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Sujit Sircar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    SUJIT
SIRCAR                 
|Sujit Sircar Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 30, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Ethics Subcommittee, Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), CDC announces the following meeting for 
the aforementioned subcommittee:

    Name: Ethics Subcommittee, Advisory Committee to the Director 
(ACD), CDC.
    Time and Date: 12-2 p.m., October 9, 2008.
    Place: This meeting will be held by conference call. The call in 
number is (866) 919-3560 and enter passcode: 4168828.
    Status: Open to the public. The public is welcome to participate 
during the public comment period which is tentatively scheduled from 
1:30 p.m.-1:45 p.m.
    Purpose: The Ethics Subcommittee will provide counsel to the 
ACD, CDC, regarding a broad range of public health ethics questions 
and issues arising from programs, scientists and practitioners.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items will include review of 
ethics guidance for public health emergency preparedness and 
response.
    Contact Person for More Information: Drue Barrett, PhD, 
Designated Federal Official, Ethics Subcommittee, CDC, 1600 Clifton 
Road, NE., M/S D-50, Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 404-639-4690, 
e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0a0c0f1c1c0b1a1a2e0d0a0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfabadaebdbdaabbbb8facabace1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Ethics Subcommittee determines that subcommittee business 
requires its consideration of this matter on less than 15 days 
notice to the public and that no earlier notice of this meeting was 
possible. At the Ethics Subcommittee's September 25, 2008 meeting, 
the subcommittee discussed this matter and determined that 
additional consideration is necessary prior to submitting the report 
to the ACD, CDC. The ACD, CDC is scheduled to meet late October.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-23268 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02426-REB-MEH

CHEVRON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARIA AGUINDA SALAZAR,

Defendant.

DOUGLAS BELTMAN,

Movant.

ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT

Blackburn, J. 

This matter is before the court sua sponte. The movant, Douglas Beltman,

initiated this action by filing his motion for protective order [#1] seeking to quash a

deposition subpoena related to a case pending in the United States District Court for the

Southern District of New York (the underlying case). On September 20, 2011, Mr.

Beltman notified this court that discovery in the underlying action had been stayed by

the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On September 30, 2011, the

magistrate judge entered an order [#16] denying the motion for protective order without

prejudice, with leave to re-file based on any action taken in the underlying case. No

further action has been taken in this case by any party.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That by May 7, 2014, the movant, Douglas Beltman, SHALL FILE a status

Case 1:11-cv-02426-REB-MEH Document 17 Filed 04/23/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

report describing the present status of this case, including a statement concerning

whether or not he again may seek a protective order from this court in this case;

2. That in his status report, the movant SHALL STATE whether or not he

opposes the dismissal of this case under FED. R. CIV. P. 41 or administrative closure of

this case under D.C.COLO.LCIVR 41.2.

Dated April 23, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02426-REB-MEH Document 17 Filed 04/23/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT NO. 23

                                      CONSENT OF
                            INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                                       Page 66


<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 30, 1997, included in CBT Corporation's
annual report to shareholders in this Form 10-K as of December 31, 1996 into
CBT Corporation's previously filed registration statements No. 33-28512 (1986
Stock Option Plan), No. 33-34459 (Retirement, Savings and Profit Sharing
Plan), No. 33-68334 (Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan), No.
33-57647 (1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan) and No. 33-56305 (Retirement,
Savings and Profit Sharing Plan).

                                                 /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Nashville, Tennessee
March 31, 1997


                                       Page 67
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP,INC.***

 

The following is a list ofthe Subsidiaries of Photonic Products Group, Inc.:

 
| **NAME**                          | ** ** | **STATE OF  INCORPORATION** | ** ** | **NAMES UNDER WHICH  SUCH SUBSIDIARIES DO  BUSINESS** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| MRC  Precision Metal Optics, Inc. |       | Florida                          |       | MRC Optics                                                                |       |
| Laser Optics Holdings, Inc.       |       | New Jersey                       |       | Laser Optics                                                              |       |

 

----
#### Ronald T. Minlionica et al., Respondents, v Amir R. Shahabi et al., Appellants.

[745 NYS2d 715]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated July 3, 2001, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Ronald T. Minlionica did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing *570the complaint, the defendants failed to establish, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the ground that the plaintiff Ronald T. Minlionica did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955). The affirmed report of the defendants’ expert did not set forth the objective tests he performed which led him to conclude that the injured plaintiff suffered no limitation to the range of motion in his neck, back, and left wrist *(see Junco v Ranzi,*288 AD2d 440). Thus, we need not consider whether the plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Chaplin v Taylor,*273 AD2d 188). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, S. Miller, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of National Healthcare Technology, Inc.
      on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period from January 27, 2005 (Inception) through September
      30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
      below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




/s/
                JON CARLSON
              Jon
                Carlson
              CEO,
                CFO
              Dated:
                February 20, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58924-58925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2008-0045]


General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement 
Plan; Intent To Renew

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice that the Secretary of Agriculture intends 
to renew the General Conference Committee of the National Poultry 
Improvement Plan (Committee) for a 2-year period. The Secretary of 
Agriculture has determined that the Committee is necessary and in the 
public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Andrew R. Rhorer, Senior 
Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, USDA, Suite 
101, 1498 Klondike Road, Conyers, GA 30094; (770) 922-3496.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the General Conference 
Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (Committee) is to 
maintain and ensure industry involvement in Federal administration of 
matters pertaining to poultry health.
    The Committee Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson shall be elected 
by the Committee from among its members. There are seven members on the 
Committee. This committee differs somewhat from other advisory 
committees in the selection process and composition of its membership. 
The poultry industry elects the members of the Committee. The members 
represent six geographic areas with one member-at-large. The membership 
is not subject to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's

[[Page 58925]]

review. A formal request for nominations for membership is published in 
the Federal Register.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of September 2008.
Boyd K. Rutherford,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-23854 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                              FORM  10-K/A-No. 1


[X]  Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.

[_]  Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ....... to ..........


                        Commission File Number 0-13617


                            LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC.
            (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


               MASSACHUSETTS                                   04-2537528
      (State or Other Jurisdiction of                       (I.R.S. Employer
       Incorporation or Organization)                       Identification No.)


      111 LAWRENCE STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS                01702
         (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                 (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code (508) 988-1000


     The sole purpose of this Form 10-K/A is to file Annual Reports on Form 11-K
     for The Lifeline Employees' Savings and Investment Plan.

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its
     behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


LIFELINE SYSTEMS, INC. (REGISTRANT)

     /s/ Dennis M. Hurley


BY   Dennis M. Hurley
     Senior Vice President, Finance
     Chief Financial Officer

DATE  June 28, 2000
<PAGE>

PAGE 1

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.   Exhibit

(99.1)        Annual Report for the Lifeline Employees' Savings and Investment
              Plan
(99.1a)       Consent of Independent Public Accountants
#### In the Matter of Benjamin Marcial, Appellant, v Kathy K. Sullivan, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 911]

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lopez-Torres, J.), dated November 13, 2000, which, without a hearing, inter alia, denied his application for visitation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court permitted the father to correspond with his two children and to obtain photographs of them, but denied his request for visitation at the correctional facility where he is incarcerated. The children’s mother is deceased, and their maternal grandmother was granted custody in 1992. The children currently reside in Pennsylvania, and the father failed to establish a meaningful relationship with them before his incarceration. The father’s eight-year-old son has never seen him, and his 10-year-old son, who has not seen him since he was two years old, does not remember him. According to the Law Guardian, both children expressed a fear of visiting their father in prison. While a parent’s incarceration, standing alone, does not make visitation inappropriate *(see Matter of Selca v Selca,*267 AD2d 314), the determination of the Family Court to deny visitation was appropriate based on all the circumstances, which demonstrate that it would be inimical to the children’s welfare *(see Matter of Selca v Selca, supra; Matter of Ellett v Ellett,*265 AD2d 747). O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000719722
<NAME> CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,633,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  664,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,728
<INVENTORY>                                    995,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,341,869
<PP&E>                                         555,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,648,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,004,534
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,152,294
<COMMON>                                    15,598,274
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,648,885
<SALES>                                      2,098,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,098,696
<CGS>                                        1,197,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,125,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             109,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,334,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,334,949)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 33-63798, 33-63800,
333-45102, 333-45110 and 333-105250 of our report dated March 26, 2004, (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the adoption of a new accounting principle), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Costa Mesa, California
March 26, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00343-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JOEL MELKIN BANEGAS-PACHECO,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No.

25] filed by defendant pro se on February 8, 2012. When a defendant is represented

by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United

States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v.

Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S.

1113 (2005). In this case, the defendant is represented by counsel. As a result,

defendant’s pleading is improper. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Downward Variance [Docket No. 25] is

STRICKEN.

DATED February 10, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge