alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Newport
News Shipbuilding Inc. Balance Sheet as of September 17, 2000, and the related
Statement of Earnings for the nine months ended September 17, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-17-2000
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      145
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   602
<PP&E>                                           1,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                     899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              473
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,506
<SALES>                                          1,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,494
<CGS>                                            1,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    113
<INCOME-TAX>                                        47
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 66
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        66
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03


</TABLE>
Order entered July 1 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00192
- CV SCOTT HORTON, PAM HO RTON AND AMSE PARTNE RS, LP, Appellant s V. THE MESSINA LAW FIRM , P.C., A ppellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 07537



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated March 23, 2016, we notified the official court reporter for the 134 th Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we have not received any response. Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Vielica Dobbins to file, within FIFT EEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellants have not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We notify appellants that i f we receive verification they have not requested the record or have not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).We DIRECT the Clerk to send copie s of this order, by electronic transmission, to Vielica

Dobbins, Official Court Reporter, 134 th Judicial District Court.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.1

CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned
hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Wilshire Financial Services
Group Inc. (the Company) that, to the best of his knowledge and
belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company
for the periods presented.

| | WILSHIRE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.
| | --------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2002

| | /s/   STEPHEN P. GLENNON
| | ------------------------
| | Stephen P. Glennon      
| | Chief Executive Officer 

| | /s/   BRUCE A. WEINSTEIN    
| | ----------------------------
| | Bruce A. Weinstein          
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer
#### The State, ex rel. Shelton, *v.*Board of Education of Springfield City School District.

(No. 24900

Decided December 26, 1934.)

*Messrs. Martin & Corry*and *Mr. John G. Durfey,*for relator.

*Mr. M. E. Spencer,*city solicitor, and *Messrs. Cole, Bowman é Eodge,*for respondent.

This matter came on for hearing upon the petition of the relator, the answer of the respondent, the evidence and the arguments of counsel.

Upon consideration whereof the court finds that the relator is an officer, that there is no evidence supporting the charges preferred against the relator, that the action of the respondent was wrongful, arbitrary, collusive, contrary to law and not in good faith, and that the relator has no other adequate remedy *(Christmann*v. *Coleman,*117 Ohio St., 1).

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue as prayed for by the relator, commanding his restoration to the office of Superintendent of Public Schools of the city of Springfield, Ohio, and that the costs be assessed against the respondent.

*Writ allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., not participating.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

          - [Docket No. APHIS-2008-0045]

# AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

We are giving notice that the Secretary of Agriculture intends to renew the General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (Committee) for a 2-year period. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Andrew R. Rhorer, Senior Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, USDA, Suite 101, 1498 Klondike Road, Conyers, GA 30094; (770) 922-3496.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the General Conference Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (Committee) is to maintain and ensure industry involvement in Federal administration of matters pertaining to poultry health.

                    The Committee Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson shall be elected by the Committee from among its members. There are seven members on the Committee. This committee differs somewhat from other advisory committees in the selection process and composition of its membership. The poultry industry elects the members of the Committee. The members represent six geographic areas with one member-at-large. The membership is not subject to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's                           ( print page 58925)                        review. A formal request for nominations for membership is published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of September 2008.

Boyd K. Rutherford,

Assistant Secretary for Administration.

 [FR Doc. E8-23854 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 10, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.1 Credit Market Debt Outstanding1** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 10.43

RETENTION AMENDMENTTOMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

THIS RETENTION AMENDMENT is made this 1 day of October, 2000, by and between SCOTT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and Debra L. Kackley, an executive employee of the Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Executive"):

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered
into a Management Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, The Company has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company to have the continued service and dedication of the Executive throughout the period beginning on the execution of this amendment and ending on the earlier of January 15, 2002 or a "Change in Control" as defined in
the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the
Agreement effective as of the date hereof by the addition at the end thereof of a new Section to read as follows:

"Section 7.      Retention

7.1 Relocation of
Work Location. In addition to other provisions of this Agreement relating to "Good Reason," the Executive shall be deemed to have terminated employment for "Good Reason" if, within twelve (12) months after a Change in
Control, the Executive is asked to relocate more than fifty (50) miles from the Executive's current work location and the Executive chooses not to relocate and instead terminates



employment with the Company.

7.2      Retention Bonus. In the event that there is a Change in Control
prior to January 15, 2002 and the Executive is still employed by the Company on the Date of the Change in Control, then the Executive will be paid a Retention Bonus in the amount of fifty percent (50%) of the Executive's then annual current base
salary in effect at the time of the Change in Control, payable within ten (10) days after the Change in Control. In the event that there is no Change in Control prior to January 15, 2002 and the Executive remains employed with the Company through
January 15, 2002, then the Retention Bonus will be paid on January 31, 2002. If the Retention Bonus is paid when no Change in Control has occurred, the Bonus amount shall be fifty percent (50%) of the annual base salary in effect at the time of such
payment."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company,
by its duly authorized officers, and the Executive have executed this Retention Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | SCOTT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                  
| |  | ------------------------------------------
| |  |                                           
| |  | ("Company")                               
| |  |                                           
| |  | By_________________________               
| |  |                                           
| |  | And_________________________              
| |  |                                           
| |  |                                           
| |  | ____________________________
("Executive")
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DURWOOD, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,949
<PP&E>                                           4,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,104
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02545-RPM-KLM

SAMMY KING,

Plaintiff,

v.

GORDON TRUCKING, INC., and

SARAH GRAHAM,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Appear by Telephone at

Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 23; Filed June 29, 2012] (the “Motion”). The Motion

does not include a Certificate of Conferral as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. However,

in the interest of judicial efficiency,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff may appear by

telephone at the Scheduling Conference on July 5, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., by calling

Chambers at (303) 335-2770 at the designated time.

The parties are warned of their continuing obligations to comply fully with

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A.

Dated: July 2, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02545-RPM-KLM Document 25 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7285

MICHAEL W. OWENS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Powhatan

Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-773-1)

Submitted: October 27, 2004 Decided: November 5, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael W. Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael W. Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Owens has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Owens’ motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Hathaway, Appellant, *v.*Newell.

*Equity*— Findings *of fact*— Credibility *of witnesses*— Appeals.

Findings of fact by a chancellor, upon conflicting testimony involving a consideration of the credibility of witnesses, will not be set aside by ah appellate court, unless manifest error is shown, and where a bill in equity for discovery and an accounting was dismissed because the chancellor regarded the testimony in support thereof as inaccurate and unreliable, the decree was affirmed.

Argued Oct. 21, 1914.

Appeal, No. 162, Oct. T., 1914, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1913, No. *4611929, in equity, dismissing bill in equity for discovery and for an accounting in case of Bose Allen Hathaway, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank H. Hathaway, deceased, v. John Newell.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity for discovery and for an accounting derived from the operation and sale of an oil and gas lease. Before Haymaker, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned,*among others, was the decree of the court.

*E. J. Kent,*for appellant.

*Clarence Burleigh,*with him *William A. Challener,*for appellee.

January 2, 1915:

Per Curiam,

This bill was by an administratrix for discovery and accounting in which she alleged that the decedent had purchased an interest in the lease of oil and gas lands held by the defendant. The allegations in the bill as to the extent of the decedent’s interest and when and how acquired were inconsistent and irreconcilable and the learned trial judge was “not impressed with the accuracy and reliability of the evidence” in support of them and he dismissed the bill for want of proof. An examination of the testimony has not led us to doubt the correctness of his conclusion. If there were a doubt, it would not lead to a reversal. The findings of fact by a judge from conflicting testimony, where the credibility of witnesses is involved, will not be set aside by an appellate court unless manifest error is shown. Patterson’s Est., 237 Pa. 24.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 21, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.124 Government-Sponsored Enterprises1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 99.5**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ON RECONCILIATION OF CANADIAN GAAP TO UNITED STATES GAAP**

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of BCE Inc. 

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of BCE Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007, and the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting as at December 31, 2007, and have issued our reports thereon dated March 5, 2008; such consolidated financial statements and reports are included in the 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders listed as Exhibit 99.2 on Form 40-F.Our audits also included the reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP of the Company listed as Exhibit 99.4 on Form 40-F. This reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP is the responsibility of the Company’s management.Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presentsfairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

As disclosed in notes (i) and (b) to the reconciliation from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP, the Company changed its method of accounting for income taxes in 2007 and for post-employment benefits in 2006.

| *(signed) Deloitte & Touche LLP*         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| Deloitte & Touche LLP                    |
| Independent Registered Chartered Accountants |

* *

Montréal, Canada March 5, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   178
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       178
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>