alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter E. Takiff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Peter E. Takiff
-----------------------
Peter E. Takiff
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2003
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (465 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (136 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (15 KB PDF)
Flows tables (145 KB PDF)
Level tables (121 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (20 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (33 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates |
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      21,007,142
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            19,708,767
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 97,594,900
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    298,639,636
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,699,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             462,518,306
<DEPOSITS>                                 363,285,912
<SHORT-TERM>                                22,352,259
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,373,688
<LONG-TERM>                                 38,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,895,907
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,506,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             462,518,306
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             21,273,017
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,455,713
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               369,038
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            27,097,768
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          10,737,985
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,602,612
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       13,495,156
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  850,836
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,077,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,923,642
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,923,642
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,927,642
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,618,013
<LOANS-PAST>                                    21,614
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              4,370,187
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,124,109
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  932,410
<RECOVERIES>                                   115,461
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,699,829
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,075,829
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        624,000


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 10.14c

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of the 29th day of February
2000 between Juno Online Services, Inc. (the "Company") and Mark Moraes (the
"Employee").

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement
dated as of October 6, 1999 (the "Employment Agreement") pursuant to which the
Employee is employed by the Company;

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained
herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.   AMENDMENT TO COMPENSATION PROVISIONS. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement
     is amended as follows:

     a.   In Section 2(a), the Compensation Period shall begin on January 1,
          2000 and shall end on December 31, 2000.

     b.   In Section 2(a), the figure set forth as the Employee's base salary
          shall be replaced with $185,000. This new figure shall remain subject
          to all of the provisions of Section 2(a).

2.   NO OTHER AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended as provided herein, the
     Employment Agreement shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force
     and effect in accordance with its terms.

3.   SEVERABILITY. The holding of any provision of this amendment to be illegal,
     invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction shall not
     affect any other provision of this amendment, which shall remain in full
     force and effect.

<PAGE>


4.   GOVERNING LAW. This amendment shall be governed by, and construed and
     interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York (without
     regard to conflicts-of-laws-principles.)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment as of the
date first written above.

JUNO ONLINE SERVICES, INC.

By: /s/ Charles Ardai
   --------------------------
        Charles Ardai
        President and Chief Executive Officer

EMPLOYEE:

    /s/ Mark Moraes
   --------------------------
        Mark Moraes
Exhibit 99.1
------------


                              PACIFIC STATE BANCORP

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific State Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company



/s/ STEVEN A. ROSSO                                         Date: March 20, 2003
----------------------------------------------------
Steven A. Rosso
President and Chief Executive Officer
Acting Chief Financial Officer


                                       74
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Heritage Bankshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
registration statements No. 333-112214 on Form S-8 of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.



/s/ Elliott Davis LLCElliott Davis LLC


Galax, Virginia

February 28, 2008



72
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02547-CMA-KLM

BOND SAFEGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JIMMY CAMP DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

 a/k/a JIMMY CAMP DEV., INC., a/k/a JIMMY CAMP, LLC,

ALLEN D. VAN WHYHE,

CARY L. CARPENTER, and

GEORGE KRAMER,

Defendants.

ORDER RE: GARNISHMENT OF WELLS FARGO – PARTIAL RESOLUTION

 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Verified Motion For Partial Resolution

of Garnishment Issues Between Plaintiff and Cumberland Green Metropolitan District

(“Motion”) (Doc. # 65), and being fully advised of the premises, ORDERS that the

Motion is GRANTED. 

1. Wells Fargo is currently holding $312,612.33 of funds in an account of the

Cumberland Green Metropolitan District (“District”) as a result of Wells Fargo's Answer

to a writ of garnishment (“writ”) filed with the Court on March 7, 2013. 

2. $200,000.00 of the $312,612.33 referred to in the preceding paragraph is

hereby released from the impact of the writ so that the District will satisfy its obligation to

Case 1:11-cv-02547-CMA-KLM Document 69 Filed 04/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

provide the unencumbered $200,000.00 reserve fund described in the Motion, and the

funds shall be used for no other purpose. 

3. As of the time of the filing of the Motion, the said $200,000.00 shall be

considered unencumbered by the writ. 

4. Wells Fargo shall continue to hold the remaining funds in the account

for the District maintained at Wells Fargo until it receives further Orders of this Court. 

5. Upon receipt of this Order, the District shall immediately inform Wells

Fargo of its entry.

DATED: April 05 , 2013

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02547-CMA-KLM Document 69 Filed 04/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>






<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         384,869
<SECURITIES>                                   422,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      13,023,781
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,334,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,812,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     10,706,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,834,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,812,308
<SALES>                                      3,616,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,708,597
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,572,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             855,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (77,004)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS
$0.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495;

Defendants.

 

ORDER TO UNSEAL CASE

The Court has for consideration the government's Motion to Unseal Case wherein the

government asks this Court to unseal the above captioned mater and all documents filed therein. 

Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED that the government's Motion to Unseal Case is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED on this day of ________________, 2011.

 

CRAIG B. SHAFFER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 17-1 filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Corporation

The following bank subsidiary is a national bank and is organized under the laws
of the United States:

         First National Bank in Manitowoc

The following non-bank subsidiaries are organized under the laws of the State of
Wisconsin and are subsidiaries of First National Bank in Manitowoc:

         United Financial Services, Inc. (data center subsidiary)
         Insurance Center of Manitowoc, Inc. (insurance agency subsidiary)

The following non-bank subsidiary is organized under the laws of the State of
Nevada and is a subsidiary of First National Bank in Manitowoc:

         FNBM Investment Corp. (investment subsidiary)
#### In the Matter of Mark J. Weinstein (Admitted as Mark Joseph Weinstein), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 5, 1991

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Richard M. Maltz*of counsel *(Hal R. Lieberman,*attorney), for petitioner.

*William J. Schwartz*of counsel *(Kronish, Lieb, Weiner & Heilman,*attorneys), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in New *648York by the First Judicial Department on February 25, 1974 and, at all relevant times, has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Department.

Upon his plea of guilty, respondent was convicted on April 17, 1990 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of one count of filing a false tax return in violation of 26 USC § 7201, a felony. He was sentenced to a suspended jail term and a period of probation of five years with a suspended fine and an assessment of $50. He prepared and signed a false income tax return for the calendar year 1984, substantially understating his income and a tax due and owing.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks an order determining that this is a "serious crime” under Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d) and 22 NYCRR 603.12 (b) and suspending the respondent from the practice of law and directing that he show cause why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made.

Respondent concedes the serious crime and asks that the matter be referred to the DDC so that he may present evidence in mitigation, which would be that he suffered from a drug addiction from which he has since recovered and that he has devoted time and effort to counseling addicted youths at Daytop Village. He also cooperated with the United States Attorney in a broader criminal investigation, which cooperation was noted at respondent’s sentencing by the United States District Court Judge. As a result of the cooperation, his former law partners also pleaded guilty. *(See, Matter of Martin,*160 AD2d 132, where we granted the DDC’s serious crime petition and suspended Martin pending the outcome of the proceedings.)

The motion by petitioner DDC should be, accordingly, granted, and respondent suspended from the practice of law forthwith and ordered to show cause within 90 days of entry of this court’s order of suspension, why a final order of suspension, censure or disbarment should not be entered against him.

Kupferman, J. P., Kassal, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ., concur.

*649Respondent is directed, within 90 days from the date of this court’s order, to show cause before the petitioner why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made and, pending final determination of the petition, respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law as indicated.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I,  Donald  Maggi,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of Front Porch  Digital Inc.  for the quarter  ended March
31, 2003 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Front Porch Digital Inc.

May 27, 2003                                    By:
                                                     /s/  Donald Maggi
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Donald Maggi
                                                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

----------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Front Porch Digital Inc. and will be retained by Front Porch Digital
Inc. and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Common or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 21



|                           |  |                                         |  |    |  |                                                   
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries of Registrant
|                           |  |                                         | 
|1.                         |  | KT Services, Inc.                       |  | 2. |  | KTI Limited                                       
|                           |  | 100% owned subsidiary                   |  |    |  | 100% owned by Key Tronic Europe, LTD              
|                           |  | Incorporated in the State of Washington |  |    |  | Incorporated in Ireland                           
|                           |  |                                         | 
|3.                         |  | Key Tronic Europe, LTD                  |  | 4. |  | Key Tronic Juarez, SA de CV                       
|                           |  | 100% owned subsidiary                   |  |    |  | 100% owned subsidiary                             
|                           |  | Incorporated in the Cayman Islands      |  |    |  | Incorporated in Mexico                            
|                           |  |                                         | 
|5.                         |  | Key Tronic China LTD                    |  | 6. |  | Key Tronic Computer Peripherals (Shanghai) Co. LTD
|                           |  | 100% owned subsidiary                   |  |    |  | 100% owned subsidiary                             
|                           |  | Incorporated in the State of Washington |  |    |  | Incorporated in Republic of China                 
|                           |  |                                         | 
|7.                         |  | Key Tronic Reynosa, S.A. de CV          |  |    |  |                                                   
|                           |  | 100% owned subsidiary                   |  |    |  |                                                   
|                           |  | Incorporated in Mexico                  |  |    |  |
Exhibit 99.7

 

**BCE Inc.EXHIBIT TO 2016 ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEARNINGS COVERAGE**

The following consolidatedfinancial ratios are calculated for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016and give effect to the issuance and redemption of all long-term debt sinceJanuary 1, 2016 as if these transactions occurred on January 1, 2016 and arebased on unaudited financial information of BCE Inc.

 

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | **December 31, 2016** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Earnings		coverage of interest on debt requirements based on net earnings		attributable to owners of BCE Inc. before interest expense and income		tax:
5.3 timesEarnings		coverage of interest on debt requirements based on net earnings		attributable to owners of BCE Inc. before interest expense, income tax		and non-controlling interest:		5.4 times |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEPHEN FREDERICK BAKER JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 445 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.