alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TAYLOR
CAPITAL GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          69,710
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              55
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    361,774
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          84,459
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            84,657
<LOANS>                                      1,417,361
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,997,138
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,501,333
<SHORT-TERM>                                   213,145
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,720
<LONG-TERM>                                    114,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,250
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,997,138
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 56,458
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,434
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   274
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                68,166
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,788
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           37,378
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 107
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 34,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,376
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          214
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,393
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.30
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,322
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,930
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,599
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,832
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,088
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               25,855
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            25,855
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### **Exhibit 32.1**

#### ** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code),the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation, (the “Company”) doeshereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) that:

 

1.    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 29, 2006 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
|                      | /s/  R. Herbert Hampton |
|                      | R.  Herbert Hampton |
|                      | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
#### George *v.*George, Appellant.

Argued May 3,1938.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and Rhodes, JJ.

Before Rimer, P. J., specially presiding, without a jury.

*Benjamin E. Friedman,*for appellant.

*337June 29, 1938:

*William L. Jacob,*for appellee.

Pee Curiam,

This was an action of divorce brought by the husband on the ground of indignities to his person, such as to render his condition intolerable and life burdensome. The court below entered a decree of divorce. The wife appealed.

As is usual in such cases, the evidence was conflicting, but the attorney for the appellant frankly admitted that the testimony of the appellee, his son and daughter-in-law, if believed, was sufficient to warrant the granting of a divorce.

In view of this, no good purpose would be served by going into the details of the actions of the respondent relied on by the appellee as grounds for divorce. The learned judge, who decided the case, saw and heard the witnesses, and was of opinion that the evidence of the libellant and his witnesses was worthy of belief, while the testimony of the respondent did not carry conviction to his mind. The libellant is seventeen years older than the respondent. When they were married on December 18, 1926, he was earning from $160 to $175 a month, but on October 1, 1934 he was transferred to the Pension List and thereafter received only $59 a month. The indignities complained of began soon after that time.

From the evidence in the case the learned trial judge made specific findings of a series of indignities offered by the respondent to the person of the libellant — which it is not necessary to detail here — so continuous as to constitute a course of conduct, and justifying a divorce on the ground charged in the libel.

We have read the testimony with care, as we are required to do, and our judgment of the evidence is in agreement with that of the court below.

The decree is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23

Consent of Independent Auditors

The
Board of Directors
PerfectData Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-51774) on Form S-8 of our report dated June 1, 2001,
relating to the balance sheets of PerfectData Corporation as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash
flows for the years then ended and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of PerfectData Corporation.

KPMG
LLP

/s/
KPMG LLP

Los
Angeles, California
June 27, 2001

E42

---

QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Date: September 7, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: Nel Steffens

Court Reporter: Tracy Weir

Interpreter: Melinda Gonzalez-Hibner

Probation Officer: Sergio Garza

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00368-REB

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

Shana Martin

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

La Fonda Traore

SENTENCING MINUTES

3:23 p.m. Court in session.

Appearances of counsel. 

Defendant is present in custody.

Interpreter is sworn; parties stipulate as to interpreter’s qualifications.

Court’s opening remarks.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3552 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, the Probation Department has

conducted a presentence investigation and has filed a presentence report and two

addenda.
2

Counsel for the government confirms that counsel has read the presentence report and

addenda.

Counsel for the defendant informs the court that counsel has read and discussed the

presentence report and addenda with the defendant.

Defendant’s counsel makes a statement on behalf of the defendant, offers information

in mitigation of punishment, comments on the probation officer’s sentencing guideline

applications and calculations, and comments on matters relating to the appropriate

sentence. 

Defendant is sworn.

Statement by the defendant.

Statement by counsel for the government.

The court makes a sentencing statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) and enters

findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment of conviction, sentence, and orders.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the plea agreement of the parties as presented in Court’s Exhibits 1,

1a, 2, and 2a is formally approved;

2. That the Defendant’s Motion for Downward Sentencing Variance [#39]

filed August 21, 2012, is DENIED;

3. That judgment of conviction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(k) is entered on

Count 1 of the Indictment;

4. That pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment

and sentence of this court that the defendant is committed to the custody

of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of forty-one (41)

months;

5. That no term of supervised release is imposed, however, the defendant is

advised that if he enters, remains, or is found in the United States illegally,

or if he illegally possesses or uses a controlled substance, or if he

possesses or uses a firearm, destructive device, or dangerous weapon as

those terms are defined in our federal law at 19 U.S.C. § 921, he may be

subject to further prosecution in federal court;

7. That no fine is imposed;
3

8. That the defendant shall pay forthwith a special victim’s fund assessment

fee of $100.00;

9. That the mandatory drug-testing provisions of 18 U.S.C.. § 3583(d) are

waived;

10. That presentence confinement credit shall be determined by the Bureau of

Prisons under 18 U.S.C. § 3585; 

14. That the defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States

Marshal.

Parties state they have no objections to the sentence imposed.

The defendant is advised of the right to appeal the sentence imposed by the court.

3:53 p.m. Court in recess.

Total time in court: 00:30

Hearing concluded.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and 

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN #JTEES42A182076495,

Defendants.

CLERK’S NOTE

This matter is before the Clerk's office on a Request for Clerk’s Entry of Default and

Partial Default against 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado. Upon examination of our records, the

Clerk notes that an answer has been filed in this matter regarding defendant 927 Cole Street,

Golden, Colorado; therefore, determination of title and ownership of the property is the subject

of dispute before the court. Therefore, 

DEFAULT of defendant 927 Cole Street, Golden, Colorado will not be entered.

DATED: May 9, 2012.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By: s/ Edward P. Butler

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 52 filed 05/09/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Judge John L. Kane 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02602-JLK 

JEANNE HARRINGTON, 

STEPHEN D. MCLEOD, 

PAUL NEWLIN, 

BARBARA NEWLIN, 

LOUISE K. PETERSON, 

STEVEN TOBASH, 

ALMA TOBASH, and 

LILLIAN WINDSOR, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC., a Colorado Corporation, 

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, INC., 

a New York Corporation, and 

ANGELO MANIOUDAKIS, 

Defendants. 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY

This above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Unopposed 

Motion For Stay (doc. #5), filed February 15, 2012. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and 

being otherwise fully advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS the Motion. This matter is 

stayed through and including Friday, April 13, 2012. If the Parties have not filed a dismissal by 

that date, the Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report on April 13, 2012. 

Case 1:11-cv-02602-JLK Document 6 Filed 02/15/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2 

 DONE this 15th day of February, 2012. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/John L. Kane 

Judge John L. Kane 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02602-JLK Document 6 Filed 02/15/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
================================================================================


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Dynatronics Corporation on Form
10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Terry M. Atkinson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                          /s/ Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                                          Chairman, President & Chief Executive
                                          Officer
                                          Dynatronics Corporation



                                          /s/ Terry M. Atkinson
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Terry M. Atkinson, CPA
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          Dynatronics Corporation



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




















By:             /s/            Jennifer Magro





Name:                        Jennifer Magro


Title:                          Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                          March 29, 2011
# CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles Peabody, the Registrant's Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bovie Medical Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements,  and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material  respects the  financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. The  Registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant  and we have: a) designed such  disclosure  controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
to us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the
effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and c)  presented  in this annual  report our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors
and the audit  committee of  Registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):  a) all  significant
deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the  Registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in internal
controls;  and b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  Registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have  indicated  in this annual  report  whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/Charles Peabody
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40927

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO QUIROZ-ESCANDON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-190-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Quiroz-Escandon appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues

that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). His constitutional challenge is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998). Although Quiroz-Escandon contends that

Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of
No. 05-40927

-2-

the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis

that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S.

Ct. 298 (2005). Quiroz-Escandon properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review. Because Quiroz-Escandon has shown no error in the

judgment of the district court, that judgment is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited financial statements of TearDrop Golf Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       522,000
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             15,676,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               1,143,000
<INVENTORY>                               20,310,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          39,535,000
<PP&E>                                     9,642,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             4,640,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            49,946,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     11,972,000
<BONDS>                                   21,265,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              49,946,000
<SALES>                                   13,028,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          13,028,000
<CGS>                                      7,093,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              7,093,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             172,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (379,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              402,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                (140,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          110,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                    372,000
<NET-INCOME>                                 372,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.07
        


</TABLE>