alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (08-076)]


NASA Advisory Committee; Notice of Renewal.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Renewal of the Charter for the NASA Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 14(b)(1) and 9(c) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and after consultation with the 
Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
(NASA) has determined that a renewal of the Charter for the Agency-
established NASA Advisory Council is necessary and in the public 
interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon NASA 
by law. The purpose of the NASA Advisory Council is to provide advice 
and make recommendations to the NASA Administrator on Agency programs, 
policies, plans, financial controls and other matters pertinent to the 
Agency's responsibilities. The structure and duties of this Council is 
unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. P. Diane Rausch, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, Office of External Relations, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202-358-
4510.

    Dated: October 2, 2008.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-24036 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN BALLENTINE; et al.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v.

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant,

MIKE WALLACE, Sergeant; JOHN

LIBERTY, Lieutenant,

Defendants,

and

CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 16728

D.C. No.

2:14

- cv

- 01584

- APG

- GWF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted and Submission Deferred March 15 , 2019 **

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 2 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 Resubmitted June 28, 2019

San Francisco, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, WATFORD, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, the plaintiffs allege that Las Vegas police

officers arrested them in retaliation for protected speech. The district court denied

in part the officers’ motion for summary judgment seeking qualified immunity , and

this appeal f

ollowed

.

I n Nieves v. Bartlett

, the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff pursuing a First

Amendment retaliatory arrest claim must generally plead and prove the absence of

probable cause for the arrest. 139 S. Ct. 1715, 172 3

- 2 4 (2019) (abrogating Ford v.

Y akima

, 706 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 2013) (per curiam) )

. The Court noted, however,

“ that the no

- probable

- cause requirement should not apply when a plaintiff presents

objective evidence that he was arrested when otherwise similarly situated individuals

not engaged in the same sort of protected speech had not been.” Id. at 1727. Because

neithe r the district court nor the parties had the benefit of Nieves when the order on

appeal was decided, we vacate that order and remand for further proceedings in light

of Nieves

.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
**Exhibit 99.32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of BCE Inc. (the “Company”),does hereby certify that:	

the annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company (the “Form 40-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in the Form 40-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.	

| Date: March 17, 2010 | *(signed) George A. Cope* |
|----------------------|---------------------------|
|                 | George A. Cope            |
#### CLEMENTS v. LEONARD.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

As
an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Archie M. Brown, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

This
certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officer serving
the Company and its many constituencies.

This
certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for any purpose
other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date:
March 10, 2010

Archie M.
Brown, Jr.
[Signature]

President &
Chief Executive Officer
[Title]

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                   (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

                             Calypso Wireless, Inc.
      In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Calypso  Wireless,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David  Davila,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Calypso  Wireless,  Inc.  and will be retained by Calypso  Wireless,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.

Dated:  April 19, 2004

                                                 /s/ David Davila
                                                 ----------------
                                                 David Davila, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23802]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 3, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Piedmont Bancorp, Inc., Norcross, Georgia; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First 
Choice Community Bank 1874, Newnan, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Merchants Corporation, Muncie, Indiana; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Lincoln Bancorp, Plainfield, Indiana, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Lincoln Bank, Plainfield, Indiana.


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 3, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-23802 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
---



Exhibit
  99.2



CONSENT
  OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We
  consent to the use in this annual report of BCE Inc. on Form 40-F of our comments
  by auditors for U.S. readers on Canada-U.S. reporting differences and auditors
  report both dated March 2, 2005 on the consolidated balance sheets of BCE Inc.
  as at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated statements of operations,
  deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
  December 31, 2004 which appear in this annual report of BCE Inc. on Form 40-F
  for the year ended December 31, 2004.

We
  also consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
  333-12130 on Form F-3 and No. 333-12780, 333-12802 and 333-12804 on Form S-8
  of BCE Inc. of our comments by auditors for U.S. readers on Canada-U.S. reporting
  differences and auditors report both dated March 2, 2005 appearing in
  the annual report on Form 40-F of BCE Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.





| |  | (signed)
      Deloitte & Touche LLP
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  |                                     
| |  | Deloitte
      & Touche LLP         





Montreal, Canada
  March 11, 2005









---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0349. DIANE ASKEWS v. NAJARIAN CAPITAL LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered

that it be hereby DENIED. Najarian Capital LLC’s motion to dismiss the application

is DENIED as moot.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 13, 2024

06/13/2024
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER05-849-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
Extension of Time

December 27, 2007.
    On December 26, 2007, the Western Power Trading Forum (WPTF) filed 
a request for an extension of time to file an answer to the Public 
Utilities of the State of California's (CPUC) Motion to Supplement 
Request for Rehearing or, in the Alternative, to Supplement the CPUC's 
Response to the Motion For Clarification of the California Generators 
filed December 21, 2007, in the above-docketed proceeding (December 21 
Motion). WPTF states that because of the intervening holidays and 
vacation schedules involving WPTF counsel and personnel, additional 
time is needed to coordinate and prepare a responsive filing.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for filing answers to the CPUC's December 21 Motion is granted and 
including January 14, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-238 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23711]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6385]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Dresden in Moonlight''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Dresden in Moonlight,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 15, 2008, until 
on or about May 31, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC. 20547-0001.

     Dated: September 30, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-23711 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our reports dated November 1, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ciprico Inc. and subsidiaries
which are incorporated by reference or included in their Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Ciprico Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-47840, File No.
33-78116, File No. 33-64999, File No. 33-65001, File No. 333-02931, File No.
333-02933, File No. 333-42841, File No. 333-42843 and File No. 333-42845).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 1, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02365-CMA-KLM

NAZARIO MEDINA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PINNACLE FINANCIAL GROUP INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Settlement [Docket No. 7; Filed

September 28, 2011].

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for November 14,

2011, at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file dismissal papers on or before

October 21, 2011.

Dated: September 28, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02365-CMA-KLM Document 8 Filed 09/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofShuffle Master, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the periodended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Coreen Sawdon, Senior VicePresident, Chief Accounting Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer,certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: July 8, 2008                                                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                  |   |
| /s/ COREEN SAWDON                                                                     |   |
| Coreen Sawdon                                                                         |   |
| *Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer  and Acting Chief Financial Officer* |

 

49

----
#### Jose A. ESPINOZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-16530.

D.C. No. CV-98-01507-FCD/DAD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*760Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jose A. Espinoza appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his conviction and fifteen year-to-life term for first degree murder and use of a firearm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.

Espinoza contends that the prosecutor committed misconduct by twice referring to gangs, in violation of a ruling in limine. Even assuming that the prosecution’s comments were improper, Espinoza has not demonstrated that the references “so infected the trial with unfairness as to make the resulting conviction a denial of due process.” *Donnelly v. DeChristoforo,*416 U. S. 637, 643, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974).

Espinoza also contends that counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress evidence of a bullet casing constituted ineffective assistance. Espinoza has failed to show either that counsel’s strategy was outside the wide range of reasonable assistance, or that the trial’s outcome would have differed had the suppression motion been made. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687-688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *Furman v. Wood,*190 F.3d 1002, 1007 (9th Cir.1999) (applying deferential standard).

Therefore, the district court properly denied habeas relief on Espinoza’s claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *Woodford v. Visciotti,*537 U.S. 19, 123 S.Ct. 357, 361, 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002) (per curiam) (stating that the federal habeas scheme “authorizes federal-court intervention only when a state-court decision is objectively unreasonable”), *reh’g denied,*— U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 957, 154 L.Ed.2d 855 (2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02559-RBJ-BNB

LEONE S. CORYELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOE I. LASLEY and

RAM TRUCKING, INC., a Wyoming corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a four-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A702, 7th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on August 20, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 

A Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference is set for August 3, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.

Counsel who will try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to 

address: jury instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, 

stipulations as to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

Case 1:11-cv-02559-RBJ Document 12 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 30th day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02559-RBJ Document 12 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2