alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02510-RBJ-BNB

CHRISTOPHER BOYERS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAKEFIELD & ASSOCIATES; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02510-RBJ Document 2 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A)
      AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AMERICAN TECHNICAL CERAMICS CORP., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                  Dated: February 13, 2006          /S/ANDREW R. PERZ
                        ----------------------   ------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
EXHIBIT (99) OPINION OF OLIVE LLP


[LETTERHEAD OF OLIVE LLP]



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Indiana United Bancorp
Greensburg, Indiana

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Indiana United Bancorp and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholder's equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1998. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,1998, and for the year
then ended, have been restated to reflect the pooling of interests with First
Affiliated Bancorp, Inc. as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements. We did not audit the 1998 financial statements of First Affiliated
Bancorp, Inc., which statements reflect total assets of $129,199 as of December
31, 1998 and total revenues of $9,981 for the year then ended. Those statements
were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our
opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for First Affiliated
Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and for the year then ended, is based
solely on the report of the other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to in the first paragraph present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Indiana
United Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1998, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Olive LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
January 29, 1999
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
incorporation by reference in Form 10-KSB/A, Amended Annual Report Under Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 1997, of CardioDynamics International Corporation of our report
dated February 25, 1997 on the financial statements of CardioDynamics
International Corporation for the year ended November 30, 1996.


                                       /s/ PETERSON & CO.
                                       ------------------
                                          PETERSON & CO.


November 24, 1998
San Diego, California
1 “[#15]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02684-REB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF WHOLESALE

SPECIALTIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HURST & BURR MECHANICAL, INC.,

JE HURLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, and

JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Dismissal [#15]1

 filed January 13, 2012. 

After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved

and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal [#15] filed January 13, 2012, is APPROVED;

2. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and

3. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own

attorney fees and costs. 

Dated January 17, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02684-REB-CBS Document 16 Filed 01/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02522-PAB-MEH

ALEX BURTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY,

LAW OFFICE OF CASTLE STAWIARSKI, LLC, and

DEBRA JOHNSON, in her personal and official capacities,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 10, 2012.

In light of the settlement of this matter, Defendant Castle Stawiarski, LLC’s Motion to

Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) [filed November 9, 2011; docket

#11], Defendant Denver Public Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss [filed December 6, 2011; docket #37]

and Defendant Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.’s Motion to Dismiss [filed January 31, 2012;

docket #76] are denied as moot. In accordance with this Court’s February 9, 2012 order, the parties

shall file dismissal papers with the Court on or before March 1, 2012.

Case 1:11-cv-02522-PAB-MEH Document 83 Filed 02/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 35 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 35 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 35 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 35 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02667-WYD-MJW Document 35 Filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 30th day of

November, 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Ruth Cabrera, Appellant,

v.

Fernando Torres and Torres Quality

Homes, Appellees.

CAUSE NO. 13-17-00574-CV (Tr.Ct.No. CL-13-2948-A)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 11th day of January, 2018.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
#### BATH v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SubsidiaryListing**

**As ofDecember 31, 2001**

 
| **Company Name**                         |   | **Parent/Sub** |   | **State of Incorporation** |   | **Number of Employees** |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| HPSC, Inc                                |   | Parent         |   | Delaware                   |   | 117                     |   |
|                                     |   |           |   |                       |   |                    |   |
| American Commercial Finance Corporation  |   | Subsidiary     |   | Delaware                   |   | 14                      |   |
|                                     |   |           |   |                       |   |                    |   |
| HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC                  |   | Subsidiary     |   | Delaware                   |   | None                    |   |
|                                     |   |           |   |                       |   |                    |   |
| HPSC Equipment Receivables 2000-1 LLC-I  |   | Subsidiary     |   | Delaware                   |   | None                    |   |
|                                     |   |           |   |                       |   |                    |   |
| HPSC Equipment Receivables 2000-1 LLC-II |   | Subsidiary     |   | Delaware                   |   | None                    |   |

 

 

 

 

----
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02613-DME-MEH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

$782,893.49 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

JUDGMENT

_____________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to and in accordance with the Default and Final Order of Forfeiture 

entered by the honorable David M. Ebel, and Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the following JUDGMENT is hereby entered:

1. Forfeiture and full legal title of defendant $782,893.49 in

United States Currency is hereby entered in favor of the United States as follows.

2. The United States may dispose of the above-described forfeited 

property in accordance with law.

Dated this ____8th____ day of _________March_________, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

GREGORY C. LANGHAM 

Clerk of the United States District Court

By:_s/Edward P. Butler___

 Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Case No. 1:11-cv-02613-DME-MEH Document 12 filed 03/08/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Incentra Solutions
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul
McKnight, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:    December 10, 2004                     By:   /s/ Paul McKnight
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Paul McKnight
                                                     Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 8, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.131 Funding Corporations1** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Natrol, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date listed below, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, and shall not be deemed part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 |                                         |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ Dennis R. Jolicoeur                      |   |
|                         | Dennis R. Jolicoeur                          |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer and Executive        |
|                         | Vice President (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6482

ALVIN GRIGSBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARWIN GUYTON, Detective; PAUL EBERT; RICHARD

SANBORN, Mr.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-02-91-2)

Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 26, 2002

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Grigsby, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Grigsby appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Grigsby v. Guyton, No. CA-02-91-2 (E.D. Va. Feb.

19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
31




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act




I, K.
John Shukur, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BMR Solutions, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation;




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.






Date:
      March 28, 2008/s/
      K. John ShukurK.
      John Shukur
                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Case 1:11-cr-00419-WJM Document 52 Filed 11/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 32

Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002),  I,  the  undersigned  Chief  Executive  and
Financial  Officer of Safe  Alternatives  Corporation  of  America,  Inc.,  (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify that,  to the best of my  knowledge,  the Quarterly
Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the period  ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed  original  of this  written  statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained
by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.

Dated:  August 12, 2004

                                                     By: /s/ Dale Hensel
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Dale Hensel
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         Chief Financial Officer