alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13

CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual
report of Millea Holdings, Inc. on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kunio Ishihara, the principal executive officer, and Tomohiro
Kotani, the principal financial officer, of Millea Holdings, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Millea Holdings, Inc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 27, 2006



By:

/s/    KUNIO
ISHIHARAName: Title:

Kunio
Ishihara President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/    TOMOHIRO
KOTANIName: Title:

Tomohiro
Kotani Managing
Director (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### DeFILIPPS CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KRISPY KERNELS CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 7, 1947

Decided January 6, 1948.

Before Justices Bobine, He her and Wachenfeld.

For the plaintiff-respondent, *Bergman & Rothbard (A. Robert Rothbard,*of counsel).

*352For the defendant-appellant, *Sandies & Sandies (Morris M.*Ravin, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wachenfeld, J.

Rule 155 (h), rules of the Supreme Court, was not complied with in this case but we have nevertheless considered it upon the merits. It was a District Court suit to recover the purchase price of two separate conveyors bought by the appellant. The plans were changed on several occasions on the order of the appellant’s manager and after the delivery was made the machines were set up and operated, inspected and accepted, and a check for the balance due promised. A short time thereafter the purchaser notified the manufacturer of certain defects in the machines and the testimony shows he expended $75 to attempt to correct them, and there was evidence they could be corrected with a further expenditure of $25. •

The trial court, sitting without a jury, determined there was substantial performance and acceptance of the machines, and although there were minor repairs to be made, consisting of supplying bronze bearings, correcting irregular channels and leveling the legs, and adding equipment for oiling, all could be done for the additional sum of $25. The court gave judgment for the contract price minus a fair allowance to make good these defects.

. The acceptance and retention of the conveyors by the appellant justified this result. There was a mixed question of law and fact, with ample evidence to support the -findings of the court below. We see no error injuriously affecting 'the appellant.

The judgment will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the six months ended September
30,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  3,913
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             326
<ALLOWANCES>                                2
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,237
<PP&E>                                 54,942
<DEPRECIATION>                         11,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         48,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     720
<BONDS>                                11,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             36,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           48,724
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,072
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (87)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (87)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             (87)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         518,000
<SECURITIES>                                19,404,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,956,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,628,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,418,000
<PP&E>                                       2,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,543,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,388,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,744,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,388,000
<SALES>                                     31,291,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,291,000
<CGS>                                       20,607,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,607,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,943,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (287,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,028,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,555,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,473,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,473,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 420 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES MICHAEL BYRNE ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 20 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2020

06/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0420
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00297-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ERIC SHAWN COPELAND,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

At the oral request of the parties, the sentencing hearing set for March 16, 2012,

is VACATED and is CONTINUED to April 13, 2012, at 8:30 a.m. That, to the extent

necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of Colorado shall assist the court in

securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing. 

Dated: February 16, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,600,000
<SECURITIES>                                18,132,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,349,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,716,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,309,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,116,000
<PP&E>                                      13,670,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,435,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,340,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,724,000
<BONDS>                                      8,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,614,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,340,000
<SALES>                                     16,327,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,327,000
<CGS>                                       12,521,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,521,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,950,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,872,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,191,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,681,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Kirk M. Warshaw,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-----------------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: April 8, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Martha Paluch

Linda Kaufman

 

Plaintiff,

v.

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART, Paula Ray

Defendant.

ARRAIGNMENT AND CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

9:59 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant present on bond.

Defendant is arraigned on Count 1 of the Information. Defendant pleads guilty to Count 1 of

the Information. The Government intends to dismiss the Counts in the Indictment against

this defendant.

The Court advises the defendant of his right to be indicted by the grand jury. The defendant

waives his right to indictment. 

Defendant sworn.

Defendant advised regarding:

1) The Plea Agreement;

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 248 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Courtroom Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

2) The maximum and minimum penalties, terms and conditions of supervised

release, restitution, probation and/or forfeiture;

3) The objectives and factors in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a).

The Court explains defendant’s right to a trial by jury and other constitutional rights and

confirms that the defendant desires to waive such rights. 

The Government orally moves to dismiss the Counts in the Indictment against this defendant. 

Defendant has no objection.

Oral findings are made of record. 

ORDER: The Government’s oral Motion to Dismiss the Counts of the Indictment against

this defendant is GRANTED, but the effect of the Order is stayed until time of

Sentencing.

ORDER: Plea Agreement and Statement by Defendant in Advance of Plea of Guilty (and

any translations thereof) are received.

ORDER: Defendant’s plea is accepted and defendant is adjudged guilty as charged in

Count 1 of the Information. 

ORDER: Probation department shall conduct a presentence investigation and submit a

presentence report as required by Fed.R.Cr.P.32. Defendant shall, with the

assistance of counsel, immediately after this hearing or as soon as is practicable

make arrangements to participate in the presentence investigation and shall

cooperate fully with the probation department.

ORDER: Sentencing hearing is set on July 8, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., in Courtroom A901, 901

19th Street, Denver, CO. 

ORDER: Bond is continued.

10:36 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 37 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 248 filed 04/08/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sbarro, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony J. Puglisi, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 10, 2008



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Anthony J. Puglisi                    
|Anthony J. Puglisi                        
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Principal Financial Officer               

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH Document 103 Filed 11/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH Document 103 Filed 11/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH Document 103 Filed 11/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:16 a.m. on Friday, September 26, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters relating to the Corporation's supervisory and resolution activities. 

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Mr. Scott Polakoff, acting in the place and stead of Director John M. Reich (Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), Julie L. Williams, acting in the place and stead of Director John C. Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii) and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)). 

The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located at 550—17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Valerie J. Best, 

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-23402 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
812 A.2d 1105

#### PHILIP D’ARRIGO, M.D., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE SOUTH JERSEY HOSPITAL SYSTEMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID M. BLOOM, DEFENDANT-MOVANT.

November 6, 2002.

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for consideration of the appeal on the merits.
### NUM BER 13-0 8-00 140- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ H A R L IN GE N MED IC A LC EN T ER , L .P . A ND HA RLINGE N HOSPI TA L M A NAGEM ENT , INC ., A pp ellan ts, v . NOE LIA B ORJ AS, A pp ellee
.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 1 38t h Dist rict C ou rt o f C amero n Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ch ief Ju stice Va lde z an d Ju stice s Yañ ez an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam App ellant s perfecte d an appe al f rom a judgmen t ent ered bythe 13 8th Distri ct Court of Cameron C ounty , Texas, i n c ause number 2007- 08- 004248- B. Appellants hav e fil ed an unop posed moti on todi smi ssthe appeal on g ro unds thatthe par ti es hav e reache d an2

agre e m e nt to comp romise and settle th eir dispute . Appe llants requests th at th is Court dism iss the ap pea l. The Cou rt , h a vi ng co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e and appel lan ts’ unoppo sed moti on todi smi ssthe appeal , i s o f the opini on that the motion s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a)
. Appel lan ts’ moti on to d ism is s i s g ra nted, and the a ppeal i s h ereby DI SM ISSE D. I n ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the par ti es, co stsare taxed ag ain st the par ty i ncur ri ng them. Hav ing dis mis sed the a ppeal at appel lan ts’ req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.
P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 12t h day

of Febr uar

y , 200 9.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.17

                                    ADDENDUM
                                     TO THE
                               IMMUNEX CORPORATION
                   STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

        WHEREAS, Immunex Corporation (the "Company") maintains the Stock Option
Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the "Plan"); and

        WHEREAS, the Company desires to adjoin an addendum (this "Addendum") to
the Plan to address the effects of the transactions contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Amgen Inc., AMS Acquisition Inc. and
the Company dated as of December 16, 2001 (the "Merger Agreement");

         NOW, THEREFORE, notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary,
this Addendum is hereby adopted, effective as of the Effective Time (as defined
in the Merger Agreement):

    Section 1. At the Effective Time, each option granted pursuant the Plan
shall be treated in accordance with the applicable terms of the Merger
Agreement.

    Section 2. In the event that an optionee ceases to be a director of the
Company or Amgen Inc. for any reason immediately prior to, at, or during the
fifteen (15) months following the Effective Time, each option held by such
optionee for common stock of Amgen Inc. shall immediately vest in full and shall
remain exercisable until the earlier of (x) the first anniversary of the date
such optionee ceases to be a director of the Company or Amgen Inc. or (y) the
end of the term of such option.

    Section 3. This Addendum shall be effective only upon the Effective Time. In
the event that the Merger Agreement terminates according to its terms, this
Addendum shall be of no force or effect.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 _____________________

No. 92-1662

 _____________________

PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FIRST REPUBLICBANK CORPORATION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Texas

_______________________________________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

(May 26, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and BARKSDALE, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We reversed the judgment of the district court with opinion

at 997 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1993), and the Supreme Court affirmed by

an equally divided vote. Our mandate has not been issued to the

district court. The Supreme Court has now held § 27A(b) to be an

unconstitutional breach of separation of powers. Plaut v.

Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 115 S.Ct. 1447 (1995). Under that

decision the claims of plaintiff are barred, and the district

court would be unable to do more than repeat its prior judgment. 

Therefore, our opinion and judgment are vacated, and the judgment

of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
#### CHAVES v. CHAVES.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.