alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 (b)

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTRULE 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

                                           /s/ Laura Beth Butler                                           Chief Financial Officer                                            Date: March 14, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02554-BNB

RONALD M. COX,

Plaintiff,

v.

(DRDC) CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PASTILLETTI (CDOC),

NURSE DOUG OF (DRDC) (CDOC),

(DRDC) WARDEN ZAVISLAN (CDOC),

(DRDC) CAPTAIN REAUX (CDOC),

(DRDC) CAPTAIN ZERBO (CDOC),

(DRDC) LIEUTENANT CARIGAN (CDOC), and

TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of D.O.C.,

Defendants.

ORDER TO DISCHARGE SHOW-CAUSE ORDER

Plaintiff, Ronald M. Cox, is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department

of Corrections at the Buena Vista Correctional Facility in Buena Vista, Colorado. Mr.

Cox claims in this action that his rights under the United States Constitution have been

violated. On March 1, 2012, the court ordered Mr. Cox to show cause why this action

should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the filing fee payment requirements of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Mr. Cox specifically was advised that, in order to show good

cause, he must submit a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the

period from December 2011 through February 2012 and, if he was required to make a

filing fee payment in any of those months, he also must make the required monthly filing

fee payment(s).

Case 1:11-cv-02554-RM-MEH Document 17 Filed 03/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

On March 9, 2012, Mr. Cox submitted a certified copy of his inmate trust fund

account statement that indicates he has had a negative balance in his inmate trust fund

account for the entire period from September 1, 2011, through March 6, 2012. 

Therefore, the court finds that Mr. Cox has shown good cause for his failure to make

any monthly filing fee payments between December 2011 and February 2012 and the

Order to Show Cause will be discharged. However, even if he is unable to make

monthly filing fee payments in the future, Mr. Cox still must submit a certified copy of his

inmate trust fund account statement each month in order to show cause why he is

unable to make a monthly filing fee payment. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the court’s Order to Show Cause (ECF No. 15) filed in this action

on March 1, 2012, is discharged.

DATED March 13, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02554-RM-MEH Document 17 Filed 03/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

To Foothill Independent Bancorp:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 2-89744 on Form S-8 filed March 1, 1984, Registration Statement No. 33-57586
on Form S-8 filed January 29, 1993, and Registration Statement No. 33-83854 on
Form S-3 filed September 12, 1994, of our report dated February 18, 2000 on the
consolidated financial statements of Foothill Independent Bancorp as of December
31, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1999 included at Page 35 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999.


                                       /s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO.,LLP
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP
                                           Certified Public Accountants


March 28, 2000
Rancho Cucamonga, California
#### STRATFORD v. RUSSELL.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Case 1:11-cv-02554-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02554-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02554-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02554-BNB Document 5 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          18,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                      3,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,651
<PP&E>                                          13,189
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,733)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                        68,975
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,333
<SALES>                                         22,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,332
<CGS>                                            8,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,779)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (22)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,801)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,801)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                              Exhibit  23.1


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-59061 and 33-78694) pertaining to the Immunex Corporation
Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan and Amended and Restated Director
Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 30, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Immunex Corporation included
in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.




                                                   Ernst & Young, LLP




Seattle, Washington
March 19, 1998


                                       71
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02569-MSK-MJW

NICHOLE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 6th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02569-MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21

                         TRANSFINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
                            LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES


Subsidiaries of TransFinancial Holdings, Inc.  State of Incorporation


Crouse Cartage Company                      Iowa

Phoenix Computer Services, Inc.             Kansas

American Freight System, Inc.
 (d/b/a AFS, Inc.)                          Delaware

Agency Premium Resource, Inc.               Kansas

   Subsidiary of Agency Premium Resource, Inc.


   APR Funding Corporation                  Delaware

TFH Properties, Inc.                        Kansas

Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation    Missouri

UPAC of California, Inc.                    California

TransFinancial Acceptance, Inc.             Kansas

Presis, L.L.C.                              Kansas


(All companies do business under same name unless otherwise indicated).
Exhibit 31.1

CEO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)  14(a) / 15d  14(a)

I, Victor J. Proffitt, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Exchange Bancshares, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 25, 2005

/s/  Victor J. ProffittVictor J. Proffitt

Chief Executive Officer
# ovlGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0416 ANNELIES AIKING-TAYLOR,

Plaintiffand Appellant, v. OLIVER SERANG,

Defendant and Appellee. 

# FI D OEC 2 9 2020 Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State nf Montana ORDER

The Appellant in this matter has moved this Court foran extension ()Hine in which to file her Reply Brief. Appellee does not object. Upon review ofAppelkint. J motion. thc Court finds good cause exists for Appellant's requested extension. IT IS ORDERED that Appellant's Reply Briefin this matter is now due on or before February 3, 2020. No further extensions will be granted. DATED this 29th day ofDecember,2020.
ChiefJustice 12/29/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0416
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated October 23, 1998, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of SI 
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 
31, 1998.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports 
in the Registration Statement of SI Technologies, Inc. in Form S-8 (File No. 
2-92865, effective August 6, 1984) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-60421, 
effective September 14, 1998).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-----------------------------
Grant Thornton LLP


Seattle, Washington
October 28, 1998

                                       44
Exhibit 32 (b)

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTRULE 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

                                           /s/ Laura Beth Butler                                           Chief Financial Officer                                            Date: March 15, 2007
#### The People *of*the State *of*New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Neil Tamblin, Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

April 11, 1956.

*Neil Tamblin,*defendant in person.

*Harry L. Rosenthal, District Attorney {Vincent L. T of any*of counsel), for plaintiff.

George D. Ogden, J.

On December 14,1942, defendant pleaded guilty to an indictment accusing him of forgery, second degree, whereupon the court appointed December 26, 1942, for pronouncing judgment. On said December 26 an information was read to the defendant charging him with having been previously convicted of a felony within the meaning of section 1941 of the Penal Law; defendant admitted being the same person so convicted and was thereupon immediately sentenced to imprisonment in State prison. Defendant now contends that the imposition *699of sentence immediately following his admission of a prior felony conviction, without waiting at least two days after such admission, violates sections 471 and 472 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and that the sentence imposed is, therefore, illegal.

Sections 471 and 472 provide, in substance, that after a plea of guilty by a defendant the court must appoint a time for pronouncing judgment, which time must be at least two days after the finding of guilty, unless the court does not intend to remain in session so long, and unless any delay be waived by the defendant. Section 1943 of the Penal Law provides that if at any time, *either after sentence or conviction,*it appears that a person convicted of a felony has previously been convicted of certain crimes, it shall be the duty of the District Attorney to file an information so accusing the defendant, and that the court shall ascertain whether the defendant has, in fact, been previously convicted of a felony. As was stated in *People*v. *Dacey*(166 Misc. 827, 829):

“ The entire proceeding under this information is an aid to the court to determine what sentence to impose upon the defendant. * * *

“ The punishment is for the new crime only, but is heavier if he is an habitual criminal. The allegation of previous convictions is not a distinct charge of crimes, but is necessary to bring the case within the statute, and goes to the punishment only.”

(See, also, *People*v. *De Santis,*305 N. Y. 44, 47; *People*v. *Caruso,*249 N. Y. 302, 306; *People*v. *Gowasky,*244 N. Y. 451, 460.)

In my opinion, the procedure followed in the case at bar was proper. By being accused of having theretofore been convicted of a felony defendant was not accused of a new crime, and the information obtained through the procedure followed was only to aid the court in determining what sentence to impose.

Defendant’s motion is, in all respects, denied.

Submit order.
Case 1:11-cv-01968-CMA-BNB Document 4 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-01968-CMA-BNB Document 4 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### **Exhibit32.4**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle GoldCorporation, (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the amendedAnnual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: April 5, 2005

 
|   |   /s/ R. Herbert  Hampton  |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   R. Herbert  Hampton      |
|   |   Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed aspart of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Queen Mining
  Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
  2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2005 (the
  "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
  below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|Dated: May 16, 2005 | /s/ Lutz Klingmann                       
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                    | Lutz Klingmann                           
|                    | President and Principal Financial Officer

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel

Criminal Case No. 1:11-cr-00361-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Disclose

Grand Jury Material To Defendant, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(i)&(F).

HAVING REVIEWED the motion and being otherwise advised in the bases, the

Court finds that good and sufficient cause supports the same, and it is therefore 

ORDERED that the government's motion is granted, and grand jury testimony

and grand jury documents may be disclosed to the defendant and his attorney in the

course of discovery in this case. It is further 

ORDERED that such materials shall only be used in defending this case; that

such materials are disclosed only to the defendant and his attorney; that the defense

attorney shall maintain custody of such materials, and shall not reproduce or

disseminate the same.
DATED this day of December, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

-2-

10th

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6386] 

In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the Department of State Performance Review Board for non-career Senior Executive Service members:

Carrie B. Cabelka, Senior Advisor to the Secretary and Director of White House Liaison, Office of the Under Secretary for Management, Department of State;

David Gordon, Director of Policy Planning, Office of the Secretary, Department of State;

Brian F. Gunderson, Chief of Staff, Office of the Secretary, Department of State; and 

Philippe A. Lussier, Office Director, Office of Resource Management and Organization Analysis, Bureau of Human Resources, Department of State. 

Dated: October 1, 2008. 

Harry K. Thomas, Jr., 

Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E8-23897 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-15-P