alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Tribal--State Class III Gaming Compact taking effect.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This publishes notice of the 2008 Class III Gaming Compact 
between the Nez Perce Tribe and the State of Idaho taking effect.

DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2008

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Acting Director, Office 
of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy 
and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal--State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Compact is entered into in 
connection with the state lottery litigation between the parties and 
thus presents unique circumstances resulting in our decision to neither 
approve nor disapprove the Compact within the 45-day statutory time 
frame.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
George T. Skibine,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Economic Development.
 [FR Doc. E8-23710 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1489 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1489

  To provide for an additional place of holding court in the western 
                        district of Washington.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2007

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Ms. Cantwell) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for an additional place of holding court in the western 
                        district of Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT.

    Section 128(b) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and Tacoma'' and inserting ``Tacoma, and Vancouver''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         573,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,764,447
<ALLOWANCES>                                   466,134
<INVENTORY>                                 11,026,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,107,947
<PP&E>                                      10,303,598
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,254,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,997,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,218,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,471
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,675,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,997,005
<SALES>                                     23,829,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,829,033
<CGS>                                       13,672,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,672,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,794,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             950,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,417,379
<INCOME-TAX>                                   351,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   830,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<CIK>                                   0000719581
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  525003
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  9830694
<DEPRECIATION>                          7644471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2751925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2751925
<SALES>                                 2172457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2179398
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         622679
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     622679
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            622679
<EPS-BASIC>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**REPORT AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

CardioDynamics International Corporation: 

 

The audits referred to in our report dated February 28, 2005, included the related financial statement schedule as of November 30, 2004, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2004,included in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In ouropinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos.333-40969, 333-38920, 333-38922, 333-70902 and 333-1190404 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-31275, 333-65331, 333-69669, 333-69663, 333-69659, 333-86475, 333-88311, 333-88307, 333-88309, 333-31702, 333-44226, 333-66396, 333-69456, 333-69458, 333-70916,333-104236 and 333-117486 on Form S-3 of CardioDynamics International Corporation of our reports dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CardioDynamics International Corporation as of November 30, 2004 and 2003, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2004, and the financial statement schedule and our report datedMarch 28, 2005 with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, whichreports appear in the November 30, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K/A of CardioDynamics International Corporation. 

 

Our report dated March 28, 2005, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004, expresses our opinion that CardioDynamics International Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2004 because of theeffect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to theCompany’s accounting for income taxes and a material weakness related to the calculation of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, CA 

March 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. P. Kimble, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 9,
2005



/s/ A. P. KimbleA. P. KimbleSenior Vice President andChief Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and will be retained by North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Charlie FARRELL v. STATE.

7 Div. 124.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02484-CMA-BNB

BENJAMIN GODFREY CHIPPS, SR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

The parties, through counsel, stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to pay 

its own costs and attorney’s fees. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Therefore, the parties request that 

the case be dismissed with prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Phil C. Pearson 

Phil C. Pearson, M.D., J.D. 

3650 S. Yosemite Street, Suite 404

Denver, CO 80237

Telephone: (720) 529-8060 

E-Mail: pcpmdjd@yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

s/Juan G. Villaseñor

JUAN G. VILLASEÑOR

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0185

E-mail: juan.villasenor@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:11-cv-02484-CMA-BNB Document 54 Filed 01/15/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (CM/ECF)

I hereby certify that on January 15, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following e-mail 

addresses:

pcpmdjd@yahoo.com

and I hereby certify that I have mailed or served the document or paper to the following non 

CM/ECF participants in the manner (mail, hand- delivery, etc.) indicated above the nonparticipant’s 

name:

None.

s/ Juan G. Villaseñor

United States Attorney’s Office

Case 1:11-cv-02484-CMA-BNB Document 54 Filed 01/15/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via a telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, November 10, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, November 10, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via a telephone conference call. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.                 

*The agenda will include the following:*                     Various IRS issues.                 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-23631 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### LAWLER v. ALIX OF MIAMI.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari dismissed without opinion.
817 A.2d 962

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH S. CARUSO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 036501989).

March 20, 2003.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that JOSEPH S. CARUSO of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years effective *558February 8, 2000, by Order of this Court filed June 13, 2002, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**BRIAN BANTUM,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 330 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 9th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin and Justice Wecht did not participate in the co nsideration or** 

**decision of this matter.**
813 A.2d 542

#### IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT S. BURRICK AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

January 15, 2003.

ORDER

ROBERT S. BURRICK of HOUSTON, TEXAS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, having pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to one count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.A.*§ 1341 and 2, and one count of interstate transportation of stolen securities and money obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 *U.S.C.A.*§ 2314 and 2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 13(b)(1), ROBERT S. BURRICK is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by ROBERT S. BURRICK *100pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that ROBERT S. BURRICK be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that ROBERT S. BURRICK comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
Case No. 1:11-cv-02613-DME-MEH Document 4 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02594-RPM

DALE GROSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

GUILLERMO SAMUDIO, Community Parole Officer; 

IAN SWEENEY, Community Parole Officer; 

JENNIFER DUNCAN, Community Parole Officer; 

ANTHONY YOUNG, Chairman of the Colorado Parole Board; 

ED THOMAS, Member of the Parole Board; 

DENISE BALAZIC, Member of the Parole Board; 

PATRICIA BAN WAAK, Member of the Parole Board; 

JOHN O’DELL, Member of the Parole Board; 

MICHAEL ANDERSON, Member of the Parole Board; 

REBECCA OAKES, Member of the Parole Board; 

FREDERICK E. TOLSON, President Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

JOHN DOES, Number 5-6, unknown officers of Sexual Offense Resource Services, LLC; 

GREIG VEEDER, President and Director, Teaching Humane Existence Treatment Program,

Inc.; and 

JOHN DOES, Number 7-8, unknown officers of Teaching Humane Existence Treatment

Program, Inc., 

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

_____________________________________________________________________

On April 14, 2011, the Colorado Parole Board revoked the parole of Dale Gross

for his failure to participate in sex offender treatment with any of the authorized

treatment providers all of whom refused to provide him treatment. He filed this civil

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the defendant parole officers and

parole board members violated his rights to due process protected by the Fourteenth

Amendment. The essence of his claim is that the defendants accepted the treatment

providers’ refusal to accept him for treatment and thereby improperly delegated to those

civilian providers the absolute discretion to refuse him for treatment. To be returned to

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 73 Filed 05/22/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

prison because of those refusals and without an opportunity to present any challenge to

the reasons for refusal or to provide any alternative course of treatment raises serious

questions under the Constitution.

Whatever the merits of the plaintiff’s narrow claim they may not be pursued in

this action because Mr. Gross has not provided any clearly established law to support

his claim. Accordingly, the defendants are entitled to the protection of qualified

immunity. It is therefore

ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and

this civil action is dismissed.

DATED: May 22nd, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02594-RPM Document 73 Filed 05/22/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**
I, Donald L. Denney, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Monarch Community Bancorp, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluations; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.       Date: March 18, 2005 By: /s/ Donald L. Denney                     Donald L. Denney               President and Chief Executive Officer