alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, Steven M. Schneider, Director and Chief Executive
Officer of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003,
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three and six
     months ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.






/s/  Steve  Schneider
------------------------------------
Steve  Schneider
Director and Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2003
EXHIBIT  23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-56590, 33-71700, as amended by Post-Effective
Amendments  No. One and Two, 333-77617, and 333-76296) of Pizza Inn, Inc. of our
report  dated  September  25,  2003  relating  to  the  consolidated  financial
statements  and  financial  statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

Dallas,  Texas
September  23,  2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending April 7, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodACKLEY STATE BANK                                                                                                       * 18C
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO 
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                             MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, INC.

     Molecular Biosystems, Inc. a corporation duly organized and existing under
the General Corporation Laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"),
hereby certifies that:

     FIRST.  The Board of Directors of the Corporation, by unanimous vote of 
its members at a meeting duly convened pursuant to the General Corporation 
Law of the State of Delaware, at which a quorum of the members of the Board 
of Directors was present in person, duly adopted a resolution proposing and 
declaring advisable an amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of 
Incorporation to amend Article 4(a) of the Corporation's Certificate of 
Incorporation to read as follows:

          "Paragraph 4(a).  The Corporation shall have authority to
          issue a total of 40,000,000 shares of common stock, par
          value $.01 per share."

     SECOND.  This amendment was duly considered and approved by the majority 
of the stockholders entitled to vote and voting at an annual meeting of the 
stockholders held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General 
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.  

     THIRD.  This amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the 
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of 
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, Molecular Biosystems, Inc., has 
caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Kenneth J. Widder, M.D., 
its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and 
attested to by Craig P. Colmar, Secretary, on this 20th day of August, 1996.

                              MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, INC.



                              By:  /s/ Kenneth J. Widder, M.D.
                                   ---------------------------------
                                   Kenneth J. Widder, M.D., CHAIRMAN
                                OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

ATTEST:

Craig P. Colmar, SECRETARY
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (343 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (15 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (13 KB PDF)
Flows tables (141 KB PDF)
Level tables (117 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (18 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (38 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates |
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 9, 2005
#### Floyd IRVIN and Wife, Trude M. Irvin, Appellants, v. NATIONAL PULPWOOD CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation and Will Salts and Wife, Estelle Salts, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 25, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
221 La. 1078

#### STATE v. BOUDREAUX.

No. 40937.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1952.

H. Purvis Carmouche, Crowley, James Domengeaux, Lafayette, for appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard J. Putnam, Dist. Atty., Abbeville, J. Lyle De-Bellevue, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Crowley, for appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant was indicted by the Grand Jury of Acadia Parish for manslaughter. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve eight years in the penitentiary. He has appealed from the conviction and sentence.

The defendant is urging on this appeal two bills of exception taken to the ruling of the trial judge during the course of the trial.

Bill of Exception No. 1 was taken to the overruling by the trial judge of defendant’s objection to the following question asked the defendant while he was on the stand by the district attorney, viz.: “Have you ever been convicted of any crime?” The defendant takes the position that the question is objectionable for the reason that the defendant was given a pardon and restitution of citizenship while he was serving the sentence in the State Penitentiary.

 A defendant who takes the stand for the purpose of testifying may be questioned concerning prior arrests and convictions. LSA-R.S. 15:495. The defendant was not prevented from showing that he had received a full pardon from the prior conviction.

Bill of Exception No. 2 was taken to the refusal of the trial judge to permit the defendant to offer and file in evidence a certified copy of a verdict and sentence rendered in the case entitled State of Texas v. Linton Rogers in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, State of Texas, dated April 22, 1943 evidencing a prior conviction and sentence of the deceased for the crime of murder. The evidence was tendered to show the probability or improbability of whether the accused or the defendant was the aggressor, to show the criminal intent of the deceased, and the dangerous character of the deceased.

*879If we assume for the purpose of this bill that an overt act on the part of the deceased had been established, his bad reputation cannot be proved by specific acts ,but proof must be confined to his general reputation among his neighbors. Under the provisions of LSA-R.S. 15:491 the good or bad character of a person depends on the general reputation that he has among his neighbors and not on what particular persons think of him.

The defendant contends that the evidence is admissible to better enable the jury to determine the probability or improbability of whether the decedent or the accused was the aggressor and to corroborate the testimony of the accused that the decedent was the aggressor. The method of proving character is provided in LSA-R.S. 15:491 and the proof is restricted to the general reputation of the person among his neighbors.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
― ―

 _

13116 Harbrs Place Bradenton,FL 34212

941 527 1417 Fax 941 761 5805

Universal Consulting Resources,LLC

3250 Benton St.Apt lo7

Wheat Ridge,C080212

STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT il July 31,2009

Beginning Balance:

Additions to Capital

Withdrawals

Avg. lnvestment Balance

Allocated Profit:

$

$

$

$

$

1,540,251.52

629,895.08

2,477.74

Ending Balance

Monthly Return

632,372.82

0.39%

Account

31-Aug Prolt A‖ ocation

31‐Oct Profit Allocation S 3,22877 $ 1,279,42417

30-Dec Prottt

28-Feb Profit A‖ ocation s 5,09432 $ 1,362,85588

Profit A‖ ocation $ 17,219.68 $ 1,394,794.41

30‐」un Profit A‖ocation $ 74,74103 $ 1,540,25152

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-6 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION




Sunshine Act Meetings

Time And Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 31, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Staff Assistant.
 [FR Doc. E8-23425 Filed 9-30-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1402 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, with respect to the exemption 

to registration requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2007 

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, with respect 

to the exemption to registration requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hedge Fund Registra5 tion Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXEMPTION FROM INVESTMENT 

7 ADVISER REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS. 

8 Section 203(b)(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

9 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3(b)(3)) is amended to read as fol10 lows: 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1402 IS

1 ‘‘(3) any investment adviser who, during the 

2 course of the preceding 12-month period— 

3 ‘‘(A) had assets under management of not 

4 more than $50,000,000; 

5 ‘‘(B) had fewer than 15 clients, except that 

6 for purposes of determining such number, no 

7 shareholder, partner, or beneficial owner of a 

8 business development company, shall be deemed 

9 to be a client of the investment adviser, unless 

10 such person is a client of the investment adviser 

11 separate and apart from their status as a 

12 shareholder, partner, or beneficial owner; 

13 ‘‘(C) did not manage the assets of more 

14 than 15 investors, whether individually, in a 

15 pooled investment vehicle described in para16 graph (1) or (7) of section 3(c) of the Invest17 ment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a– 

18 3(c)), or otherwise; and 

19 ‘‘(D) was neither held out generally to the 

20 public as an investment adviser nor acted as an 

21 investment adviser to any investment company 

22 registered under title I, or a company which has 

23 elected to be a business development company 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 1402 IS

1 pursuant to section 54 of title I, and has not 

2 withdrawn its election;’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:11-cv-02506-PAB-KMT Document 1-1 Filed 09/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02506-PAB-KMT Document 1-1 Filed 09/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02506-PAB-KMT Document 1-1 Filed 09/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-85749) on Form S-8 of First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
February 4, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1999, and all related schedules, which report appears
in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of First Manitowoc Bancorp,
Inc.

KPMG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 8, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,010
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,010
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,940)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
VACATE and REMAND and Opin ion Filed January 7, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00929-CV RUCKUS MARKETING, LLC, Appellant V. FREEMAN EXPOSITIONS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-18208
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justi ce Goldstein, and Justice Smith Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The parties have informed the Court they have settled all matter s in controversy and request, by joint motion, that we set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for the trial court to render judgment in accordance with their agreement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We grant the motion and, without regard to the merits, vacate the trial court’s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See id.

210929F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
RUCKUS MARKETING, LLC, Appellant

No. 05-21-00929-CV V.
FREEMAN EXPOSITIONS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-18208. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns, Justices Goldstein and Smith participating.

In accordance with this Cour t’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and REMAND the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Subject to any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellee Freeman Expositions, LLC recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Ruckus Marketing, LLC.

Judgment entered January 7, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00367-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. RAUDEL MACIAS-RANGEL, a/k/a Raul Macias,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure that all

pretrial phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is

ORDERED that pretrial motions shall be filed by Thursday, October 20, 2011,

and responses to these motions shall be filed by Tuesday, November 1, 2011. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a 3-day jury trial is set to commence on Monday,

November 21, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002. Finally, it is

ORDERED that the parties shall promptly contact the Court if a hearing on

motions and/or final trial preparation conference needs to be set. 

Dated: September 20, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DARRYL L. COOK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5049

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00870-PEC, Chief Judge Patricia E. 

Campbell-Smith.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Darryl L. Cook moves to reconsider the court’s prior 

orders in this appeal. As noted in the September 25, 2014 

letter from the Clerk of Court to Mr. Cook, this appeal 

was dismissed on July 1, 2014. On July 29, 2014, this 

court ordered Mr. Cook to submit Form 6, Form 6A, and 

his informal brief within 30 days of the date of that order

to re-open his appeal. 

Case: 14-5049 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 10/24/2014
2 COOK v. US

The time for seeking reconsideration of this court’s 

orders has passed. See Fed. Cir. R. 45(a)(1). Any further 

motions or submissions by Mr. Cook in this appeal will be 

retained but will not be acted upon. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is denied. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s30

Case: 14-5049 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 10/24/2014
#### In the Matter of Pat Frank Nesci, an Attorney, Resignor.

Second Department,

December 17,1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Pat Frank Nesci,*resignor *pro se.*

*Frank A. Finnerty, Jr.,*for Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Pat Frank Nesci has submitted an affidavit dated September 28, 1990, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Nesci was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the *267Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on October 17, 1962.

Mr. Nesci acknowledges that he is currently the subject of an investigation by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District concerning allegations, *inter alia,*that he converted $525,000 he held in an escrow account to his own use and benefit, and in a separate matter, converted $25,000 he held in an escrow account to his own use and benefit.

Mr. Nesci acknowledges that he could not successfully defend himself on the merits against charges predicated upon the misconduct outlined in his affidavit of resignation, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily rendered, that he is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of submitting his resignation.

Under the circumstances herein, the resignation of Pat Frank Nesci as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed. Accordingly, Pat Frank Nesci is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the resignation of Pat Frank Nesci is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Pat Frank Nesci is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that Pat Frank Nesci shall promptly comply with this court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law §90, effective immediately, Pat Frank Nesci is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.