alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ALEXIS et al. v. WALKER et al.

No. 18954.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 7, 1948.

Neils F. Hertz, E. B. Charbonnet, Jr., and Joseph M. Bowab, all of New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Warren O. Coleman, Edwin J. Prinz and^ Solomon S. Goldman, all of New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

McBRIDE, Judge.

On the suit of Luden V. Alexis and Gus-tave C. Chapital, Jr., a preliminary injunction was issued against the appellants, Supreme Industrial Life Insurance Company, Inc., Frank J. Walker and Raleigh J. Coker (the two individuals being officers, directors and stockholders of the corporation), restraining, enjoining and prohibiting them from holding, on January 6, 1948, or on any other date, a meeting of the stockholders of the corporation for the purpose of electing directors for the corporation, until a final decree and judgment has been rendered and signed in the suit involving the ownership of *41%*shares of the capital stock of the corporation, which suit is entitled: “Gustave C. Chapital, Jr., v. Frank J. Walker, et al.”

A full discussion of the internal affairs of the defendant corporation will be found in two opinions handed down by us this day.

The sole defense made in this court, is contained in a short statement in the brief of appellants, as follows: “The question of ihe propriety of the preliminary injunction is moot once the stock ownership suit is decided, therefore we submit the proper action of this Court will be to remand this matter for trial on its merits.”

We do not agree with counsel that once the stock ownership litigation is decided by this court that we should hold the question of the propriety of the preliminary injunction is moot and recall the writ, for it may well be that application will be made to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for writs in the stock ownership suit, which would then deprive the plaintiffs herein of the protection which the preliminary injunction appealed from gives 'them.

*907The voting of the 41^ shares of the disputed stock has been enjoined in Chapital v. Walker, et al., La.App., 35 So. 2d 900. If a meeting of stockholders is held at this time for the election of a new board of directors, the Chapital-Alexis faction would he deprived of the benefit of the voting power of said disputed shares, and the said faction will he in the minority due to the disproportionate distribution of the stock which could be voted. To deprive Chapital of the right to vote this stock would undoubtedly cause him irreparable injury, in view of the tense situation which exists in the scrambled affairs of the corporation. We believe that justice and equity dictate that there should be no stockholders meetings until such time as the ownership of the 41 *Yz*shares of stock is finally judicially determined and the full voting power can participate at the election of new directors. The status quo should be maintained until then.

For the reasons assigned, the order appealed from, granting the preliminary injunction, is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                              EXHIBIT 11



                NORTH PITTSBURGH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 Statement - computation of per share earnings

                Statement of Computations of Earnings per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            For the Three Months         For the Six Months
                                                Ended Mar. 31               Ended June 30
                                          ------------------------    ------------------------

                                             1999         1998           1999         1998
                                          -----------  -----------    -----------  -----------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>
Net Earnings                              $ 2,779,000  $ 4,066,000    $ 6,195,000  $ 8,317,000
                                          ===========  ===========    ===========  ===========

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                              15,005,000   15,005,000     15,005,000   15,005,000
                                          ===========  ===========    ===========  ===========

Basic and diluted earnings per share
  of common stock                         $       .18  $       .27    $       .41  $       .55
                                          ===========  ===========    ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to



Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of iGate Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ SUNIL WADHWANI                    
|                                      
|Sunil Wadhwani                        
|Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors,
|Chief Executive Officer, and Director 





November 14, 2003



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to iGate Corporation and will be retained by iGate Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: August 13, 2012

Court Reporter: Tamara Hoffschildt

Probation Officer: Erika Hitta (by video)

Veronica Ramirez

Criminal Action No. 11cr-00412-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, James Boma

Plaintiff,

v.

FLODINA BELETSO GALLEGOS, Michael Goldman

Defendant.

SENTENCING MINUTES

______________________________________________________________________________

11:05 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant present in custody.

Change of Plea Hearing on May 17, 2012. Defendant pled guilty to Count 1 of the

Superseding Indictment.

The Government orally moves to dismiss Count 1 of the original Indictment against this

defendant. Defendant has no objection.

ORDER: The Government’s oral motion to dismiss Count 1 of the original indictment

against this defendant is GRANTED.

Parties received and reviewed the presentence report and all addenda.

The parties do not dispute the facts contained in the presentence report.

The parties do not dispute the calculation of the sentence under the Federal Sentencing

Guidelines as set forth in the original presentence report.

The Government does request departure (Doc. #332). Argument.

The parties do not contend that the sentence should be different from that calculated under the

Sentencing Guidelines in light of the sentencing objectives set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section

3553(a).

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 352 Filed 08/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Sentencing Minutes

Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

Allocution. - Statements made by: The defendant, defense counsel.

After consideration of the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3553 (a), the Court announces the sentence it

intends to impose as reflected in the record. Counsel are offered the opportunity for further

argument. No further argument.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Decrease for Acceptance of Responsibility (Doc.

#333) is GRANTED.

ORDER: The Government’s Motion for Downward Departure (Doc. #332) is GRANTED.

THE DEFENDANT IS SENTENCED AS REFLECTED IN THE RECORD.

The defendant is advised of her right to appeal.

ORDER: Defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal for the

District of Colorado.

11:26 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 21 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case 1:11-cr-00412-REB-DW Document 352 Filed 08/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 60310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency


Notice of Maximum Amount of Assistance Under the Individuals and 
Households Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the maximum amount for assistance under 
the Individuals and Households Program for emergencies and major 
disasters declared on or afterOctober 1, 2008.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2008, and applies to emergencies and 
major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berl D. Jones, Jr., Disaster 
Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 212-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 
U.S.C. 5174, prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum 
amounts for assistance provided under the Individuals and Households 
(IHP) Program. FEMA gives notice that the maximum amount of IHP 
financial assistance provided to an individual or household under 
section 408 of the Stafford Act with respect to any single emergency or 
major disaster is $30,300. The increase in award amount as stated above 
is for any single emergency or major disaster declared on or after 
October 1, 2008. In addition, in accordance with 44 CFR 61.17(c), this 
adjustment includes the maximum amount of available coverage under any 
Group Flood Insurance Policy (GFIP) issued for those disasters.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 5.4 percent for the 12-month period 
ended in August 2008. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 16, 2008.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Individuals and 
Households--Housing; 97.049 Individuals and Households--Disaster 
Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households--Other Needs.

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-24069 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY CO. (A CORPORATION), APPELLANT, v. DANIEL BERMES, RESPONDENT.

Submitted May 2, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the appellant, *Abram S. Block*and *Bernard P. Hughes.*

For the respondent, *Walscheid & Rosenkranz (Milton Rosenkranz).*

Pee Curiam.

The appeal in this case raises the question of whether the complaint was untrue in alleging that the instrument in suit was a specialty. Under the rule laid down in *Fidelity Union Trust Co.*v. Fitzpatrick, 134 *N. J. L.*250, it obviously was not, and the allegation in the complaint to the contrary was false.

There is no point in the argument that the question should have been raised by plea and not on motion to strike. The purpose of the present Practice Act was to simplify pleading.

The' judgment under appeal will be affirmed.

*For affirmance —*The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

*For reversal*— Wachenfeld, J. 1.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 18, 2010

JOHN LEY

ACTING CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-10982

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-00133-CR-ORL-31-KRS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ROBERTO ORTIZ,

a.k.a. Bobby,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 18, 2010)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Donaldson, appointed counsel for Jose Roberto Ortiz, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Ortiz’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
Case 1:11-cv-02668-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02668-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02668-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02668-LTB Document 2 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 59642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 801 West Orchard St., Suite 5, 
Bellingham, WA 98225, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils 
for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 
151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to 
conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and 
receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or 
approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries 
regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited 
or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f3c3d2f71333e3d372e1f3b372c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed8e8f9dc3818c8f859cad89859ec38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on March 14, 2007. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for March 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: October 2, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E8-24041 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


         This FIRST AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT, dated effective as of the
13th day of May, 2004 (the "Effective Date"), is made by and between Pinnacle
Towers Acquisition Holdings LLC (as successor in interest to Pinnacle Towers
Acquisition Inc.), for itself and on behalf of any of its operating subsidiaries
and affiliates (hereinafter "PTAH") and Global Signal Services LLC ("GSS"),
assignee of Pinnacle Towers Inc.

         WHEREAS, PTAH and GSS are parties to that certain Management Agreement
("Agreement"), dated September 25, 2003, between Pinnacle Towers Acquisition
Inc. and Pinnacle Towers Inc., which Agreement was validly assigned from
Pinnacle Towers Inc. to Global Signal Services LLC on February 5, 2004;

         WHEREAS, PTAH and GSS desire to amend said Agreement to reflect rates
that are more consistent with market pricing;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for a good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

1.       Schedule A of the Agreement is hereby stricken and replaced it its
entirety with the attached Schedule A to this First Amendment to Management
Agreement; and

2.       Except as hereby amended, said Agreement shall remain as originally
written, in full force and effect.


Executed the 13th day of May, 2004, but effective as of the Effective Date.

PINNACLE TOWERS ACQUISITION              GLOBAL SIGNAL SERVICES LLC
HOLDINGS LLC


By:   /s/ David J. Grain                 By:   /s/ William T. Freeman
   ------------------------------           -----------------------------------
Name:   David J. Grain                   Name:   William T. Freeman
Title:  President                        Title:  EVP, CFO & Assist. Secretary






                                   SCHEDULE A




MONTHLY SERVICE FEE - 10% OF OPERATING REVENUES LESS THE STRAIGHT LINE REVENUE
ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED UNDER SFAS 13.




























                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         377,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  785,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,007,695
<PP&E>                                       5,543,244
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,898,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,113,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          768,006
<BONDS>                                        350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    500,000
<COMMON>                                        41,007
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,454,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,113,227
<SALES>                                      6,206,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,206,092
<CGS>                                        4,561,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,408,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (229,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (251,710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,789
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00389-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. SANDRA RUTH PACHECO-NEVARES,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES AND DEADLINES

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter has been scheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge

Philip A. Brimmer in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A701, 7th Floor, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on December 12, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. It is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by November 14, 2011 and

responses to these motions shall be filed by November 21, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall

be made no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any

challenges to such experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is

further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made

one week after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such

experts shall be made no later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is

further

Case 1:11-cr-00389-PAB Document 12 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is set for December 9, 2011 at

9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A701. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in

person. 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial

Preparation Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED October 21, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00389-PAB Document 12 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 16, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.108 Monetary Authority1** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|