alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code),
the undersigned officer of TeliaSonera AB, a Swedish company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

|April 7, 2005 |  | By: | /s/ANDERS IGELAnders Igel
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Sidney MALONE v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,457,552
<SECURITIES>                                14,394,870
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,508,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (334,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,598,686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,460,172
<PP&E>                                       7,518,596
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,140,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,687,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,000,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,000,446
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,687,882
<SALES>                                     65,349,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,349,436
<CGS>                                       40,319,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,954,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (495,765)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,554,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,704,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,850,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,850,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1319 

To provide for the conversion of a temporary judgeship for the district 

of Hawaii to a permanent judgeship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for the conversion of a temporary judgeship for 

the district of Hawaii to a permanent judgeship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVERSION OF TEMPORARY JUDGESHIP TO 

4 PERMANENT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT 

5 OF HAWAII. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The existing judgeship for the dis7 trict of Hawaii authorized by section 203(c) of the Judicial 

8 Improvements Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 133 note; Public 

9 Law 101–650; 104 Stat. 5089) shall, as of the date of 

10 enactment of this Act, be authorized under section 133 


bajohnson on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•S 1319 IS

1 of title 28, United States Code, and the incumbent in that 

2 office shall hold the office under section 133 of title 28, 

3 United States Code, as amended by this Act. 

4 (b) TABLES.—In order that the table contained in 

5 section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will reflect 

6 the change in the total number of permanent district 

7 judgeships authorized as a result of subsection (a) of this 

8 section, the item relating to Hawaii is amended to read 

9 as follows: 

‘‘Hawaii .................................................................. 4’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC74 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           3,490
<SECURITIES>                                     6,726
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                       156
<INVENTORY>                                      1,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,295
<PP&E>                                          12,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,961
<SALES>                                         23,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,379
<CGS>                                            8,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>
Order filed February 17, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00134-CV

____________

HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., Appellant

V.

JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ, ET. AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-15489

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from an interlocutory order issued January 30, 2012. 

On February 17, 2012, appellant filed a motion in this court requesting temporary orders 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 29. Rule 29.3 provides that in an appeal 

from an interlocutory order, an appellate court may make “any temporary orders necessary 

to preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal and may require appropriate 

security.” Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. 

Appellant requests that we stay production of discovery in the underlying case 

pending disposition of the interlocutory appeal. It appears from the facts stated in the 
2

motion that appellant’s rights may be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is 

granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion and issue the following order.

We therefore ORDER that discovery proceeding in the court below be stayed in trial 

court cause number 2010-15489, styled Jose Luis Sanchez, et. al. v. Hartfor Insurance 

Company of the Midwest, et. al. The order is stayed until final decision by this court in 

this interlocutory appeal or until further orders of this court.

Appellees are requested to file a response to appellant’s motion on or before 

February 24, 2012.

PER CURIAM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: September 21, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Sabrina Grimm

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02595-RPM

CHRISTINE DOCKSEY and James H. Chalat

ROSS DOCKSEY, Russell R. Hatten

Plaintiffs,

v.

TAYLOR JANDA, Karen R. Wasson

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Pretrial Conference

9:50 a.m. Court in session.

Discussion regarding status of Christine Docksey’s medical condition.

Mr. Chalat states additional surgery will be performed (knee realignment).

Discussion regarding scheduling.

ORDERED: One week jury trial scheduled March 11, 2013.

Discussion and arguments by counsel regarding pending motions.

ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendant’s Disclosure of Pete Wither as an Expert

Witness [11], is granted.

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend the Deadline to Disclose Contradicting Expert

Witnesses [12], is moot.

Counsel agree to disclose the use of any non-standard demonstrative exhibits.

Court states its practice regarding motions in limine.

Court rules on the permissible scope of the anticipated testimony of Mr. Janda as stated on record.

Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 18 Filed 09/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

September 21, 2012

11-cv-02595-RPM

Discussion regarding case facts.

Court rules on the permissible scope of the anticipated testimony from the eye witnesses of the

accident as stated on record.

Court states its trial videotape transcript practice (one written transcript for each deponent, plaintiffs’

designations identified in yellow, defendant’s designations identified in blue, objections identified in red

in margins and speaking objections identified by page and line attached).

Discussion regarding damages.

Mr. Chalet states no economic loss and loss of consortium is household chores and errands.

Discussion regarding exhibits.

ORDERED: Oral motion to permit the taking of a trial preservation deposition of Dr. Dwyre is

granted.

Counsel state they anticipate having four witnesses by videotape and possibly an additional three.

Court states its trial practices.

ORDERED: Deadline to submit transcripts of witnesses appearing by videotape is February 22,

2013.

Deadline for proposed voir dire, proposed substantive instructions and proposed

statement of case is March 6, 2013.

Pretrial Order approved as supplemented by today’s Minutes of this conference

and as stated on record.

10:25 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 35 min.

Case 1:11-cv-02595-RPM Document 18 Filed 09/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,702
<SECURITIES>                                     6,696
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                       239
<INVENTORY>                                      1,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,278
<PP&E>                                          37,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,917
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,504
<SALES>                                         24,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,410
<CGS>                                            6,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1997 QUARTERLY REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,044
<SECURITIES>                                       370
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,953
<PP&E>                                         134,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,839
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,562
<BONDS>                                         23,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,350
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,605
<SALES>                                          1,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,451
<CGS>                                            1,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 10(1)(a)
BELROSE CAPITAL FUND LLCAMENDMENT NO. 1toINVESTMENT ADVISORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of May 29, 2007, to the Investment Advisory and Administrative Agreement dated as of March 12, 2002 (the Agreement), is made between the parties to the Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.

Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

2. Compensation of the Adviser. For the services, payments and facilities to be furnished hereunder by the Adviser, the Adviser shall be entitled to receive from the Fund (subject to the fee waiver set forth in paragraph 4 hereof) in respect of each month a monthly investment advisory and administrative fee at the rate of 1/20th of 1% of the average daily gross assets of the Fund. The term gross assets means the value of all the Funds assets, including the Funds interest in Belvedere Capital Fund Company LLC and the Funds ratable share of the assets of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, real estate joint ventures and co-owned real property investments, without reduction by any liabilities. Such compensation shall be paid monthly in arrears on the last business day of each month. The value of the Funds assets shall be computed daily in accordance with the LLC Agreement. In case of initiation or termination of this Agreement during any month with respect to the Fund, the fee for that month shall be based on the number of calendar days during which it is in effect.

Except as amended hereby, the terms and conditions in the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force in effect.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed as of the day and year first written above.

|BELROSE CAPITAL FUND LLC      
|------------------------------
|By: EATON VANCE MANAGEMENT,   
|Its Manager                  
|                              
|By: /s/ Maureen Gemma         
|Vice President                
|                              
|BOSTON MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
|                              
|By: /s/ Deidre Walsh          
|Vice President
#### LACOBEE v. DE SOTO WHOLESALE GROCERY CO., Inc., et al. (two cases). WATERS v. SAME. MIDDLETON v. SAME.

No. 6656-6659.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 28, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1943.

Certiorari Denied Feb. 7, 1944.

*744Wellborn Jack, of Shreveport, for appellants.

Booth & Lockard, of Shreveport, and Francis H. Alston, of Logansport, for ap-pellees.

HARDY, Judge.

These cases were consolidated for trial in the District Court with the suit of J. Cook Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Company, Inc., et al., No. 17,290 on the docket of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, De Soto Parish, Louisiana, No. 6655 on the docket of this Court.

For the reasons set forth in opinion this day handed down in J. Cook Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Company, Inc., et al., 16 So.2d 739, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

On Application for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

Attention of the Court has been called to the point that our statement of facts in the opinion of October 28, 1943, 16 So.2d 739 omitted mention of the fact that defendant’s employee, Russell, at the time of leaving the Caddo Hotel in Shreveport about 6 :30 on the evening of the accident, intended to return to Logansport. There is no dispute on this point. The testimony of Russell in his deposition plainly indicates that he did intend to return to Logansport and that he was actually en route there when he made the stop at Kolb’s Bar. Russell also testified that he intended to turn in the orders he had received during the day to his employer the following morning.

For the purpose of clarifying the record, the additional facts are hereby incorporated as a part of the statement of fact set forth in our opinion as above referred to.

However, this statement is not to be construed as indicating that it is our opinion that Russell intended making the return trip to Logansport from Shreveport in connection with the duties of his employer’s business. On the contrary, we adhere to the expressions of bur original opinion to the effect that no re-entry upon the business of the employer was established.

The application for rehearing is denied.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW

JOEL HUGHES,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICER WESLEY KVASNICKA; and

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Jointly and Severally,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order on

Summary Judgment, filed on January 6, 2014, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior

United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it

is

ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Denver

Police Officer Wesley Kvasnicka and The City and County of Denver, Jointly and

Severally, and against Plaintiff, Joel Hughes, on Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint and action are dismissed. It is further

ORDERED that Defendants shall have their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs

with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment, and pursuant

to the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 79 Filed 01/07/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 7th day of January, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/ Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler,

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 79 Filed 01/07/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 10.3**

 
|  | ** ** | 25 Orinda WayOrinda,  CA 94563t.  925 253 4500f.  925 253 4599www.intraware.com |
|--|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

August 1, 2005

 

Wendy A. Nieto

Chief Financial Officerand Executive Vice President

Intraware, Inc.

25 Orinda Way

Orinda, CA 94563

 

Dear Wendy:

 

I am delighted to informyou that the Compensation Committee has approved the following bonus plan foryou for the 2006 fiscal year.  You willbe eligible to receive a cash bonus of $60,000 if Intraware achieves certaincorporate goals with respect to:

 

1.               Intraware’s annualrevenue growth between fiscal years 2005 and 2006,

 

2.               decrease in Intraware’sloss from operations between fiscal years 2005 and 2006,

 

3.               Intraware’s netcash provided from operating activities in fiscal year 2006, and

 

4.               Intraware’s cashbalance at the end of fiscal year 2006, net of amounts payable as bonuses.

 

The specific dollaramount associated with each goal will be communicated to you separately by theCompensation Committee.

 

Any bonus will be paidwithin 15 days after the issuance of the fiscal year-end audit report byIntraware’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2006 fiscalyear.  Any payout of a bonus is subjectto final approval by the Compensation Committee.

 
| Very truly yours,            |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ MELINDA ERICKS           |   |
|                         |
| Melinda Ericks               |
| Director of Human  Resources |

 

----