alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

58867 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 196 

Wednesday, October 8, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8302 of October 3, 2008 

Fire Prevention Week, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Fire Prevention Week is an opportunity to call attention to the importance 

of fire safety, especially in the home, and to honor our Nation’s firefighters 

for their heroism. 

Americans can help reduce home fires by taking simple steps such as 

regularly inspecting furnaces and fireplaces, keeping space heaters at least 

3 feet from flammable materials, and checking the condition of electrical 

cords. Making sure that smoke alarms and fire extinguishers work can also 

help minimize the impact of home and building fires. I encourage all Americans to remember this year’s theme—‘‘It’s Fire Prevention Week: Prevent 

Home Fires!’’—and to check their homes for fire hazards to help prevent 

disasters. 

Across our Nation, firefighters put themselves at risk to protect our communities, and their selfless dedication has saved countless lives. America’s 

Bravest hold a cherished place in our hearts, and we honor those who 

have paid the ultimate price to protect citizens in harm’s way. The sacrifice 

of these men and women is an inspiration to all and epitomizes the true 

meaning of heroism. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 5 through October 

11, 2008, as Fire Prevention Week. On Sunday, October 5, 2008, in accordance with Public Law 107–51, the flag of the United States will be flown 

at half staff on all Federal office buildings in honor of the National Fallen 

Firefighters Memorial Service. I call on all Americans to participate in 

this observance through appropriate programs and activities and by renewing 

their efforts to prevent fires and their tragic consequences. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES5
58868 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 8, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of 

October, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E8–24016 

Filed 10–7–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0001023767
<NAME> HEALTHDESK CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,431,465
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,061,466
<PP&E>                                         965,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                 547,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,498,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          455,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    500,000
<COMMON>                                    12,257,505
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,498,748
<SALES>                                         12,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,910
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               772,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (744,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (744,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (744,307)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1.1

CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

This
First Amendment to SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT(this Amendment), is made and entered into as of April 17, 2006, by and among CardioDynamics International Corporation, a
California corporation (the Company), and the purchasers listed on Schedule A attached hereto (collectively, the Purchasers and individually, a Purchaser). (Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed in the Agreement (as defined below.))

Section 2.1 of that certain Securities Purchase Agreement
(the Agreement) by, between and among the parties set forth above and on Schedule A hereto is hereby amended by adding the following proviso to such Section 2.1:

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall a Purchaser have the right or be required to exercise the Notes to the extent
that as a result of such exercise, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by such Purchaser, its Affiliates and any group (as defined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder) of which the Purchaser may be deemed to be a party (collectively the Purchasers Affiliates) would exceed 9.99% of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock following such exercise. For purposes of this
Section 2.1, beneficial ownership shall be calculated in accordance with Sections 13(d) and Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. The provisions of this Section 2.1 may be waived by a Purchaser as to itself (and solely as
to itself) upon not less than 65 days prior written notice to the Company, and the provisions of this Section shall continue to apply until such tenth day (or later, if stated in the notice of waiver).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have caused this Amendment to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.



CARDIODYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Michael K. PerryName: Michael K. PerryIts: Chief Executive OfficerFax No (858) 623-8415ATLAS MASTER FUND, LTD.By:

/s/ Scott H. SchroederName: Scott H. SchroederIts: Authorized Signatory




---

Schedule A

PURCHASERS

Name and Address of Purchaser

Atlas Master Fund, Ltd.*

c/o Balyasny Asset

Management L.P.

650 Madison Avenue  19thFloor

New York, NY 10022

Attention: Allen Silberstein

Visium Balanced Fund, LP

c/o Balyasny Asset

Management L.P.

650 Madison Avenue  19thFloor

New York, NY 10022

Attention: Allen
Silberstein

Visium Balanced Fund Offshore, Ltd.

c/o Balyasny
Asset

Management L.P.

650 Madison Avenue  19thFloor

New York, NY 10022

Attention: Allen Silberstein

Visium Long Bias Fund, LP

c/o Balyasny Asset

Management L.P.

650 Madison Avenue  19thFloor

New York, NY 10022

Attention: Allen Silberstein

Visium Long Bias Fund Offshore, Ltd.

c/o Balyasny Asset

Management L.P.

650 Madison Avenue  19thFloor

New York, NY 10022

Attention: Allen
Silberstein
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB

THE WELLINGER FAMILY TRUST 1998;

JULIE WELLINGER, trustee, and

JULIE WELLINGER, individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance

company,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

After review of confidential settlement statements submitted by the parties, I have

concluded that a settlement conference at this time would be a waste of judicial resources. 

Consequently, none will be scheduled.

SO ORDERED.

Dated July 25, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB Document 107 Filed 07/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02519-WYD-MJW 

TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Maryland company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRACBEAM, L.L.C., a Colorado limited liability company, 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

 Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer 

(ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. The Surreply attached to the motion is accepted for filing. 

 January 4, 2012 

Case 1:11-cv-02519-WYD-MJW Document 15 Filed 01/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit10.11**

**HPSC, INC.**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1998 STOCKINCENTIVE PLAN**

 

 

 

**WHEREAS,**HPSC, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the HPSC, Inc.Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit ofcertain eligible employees and directors;

 

**WHEREAS,**the Company desires to amend the Plan to extend thepost-termination exercise expiration for Director options.

 

**NOW THEREFORE,**the Plan is hereby amended as follows

 

1.                                                Paragraph 5 (b)(iii) is hereby deletedand the following section 5(b)(iii) is substituted therefor:

 

                EachDirector Option shall terminate and may no longer be exercised upon theearliest of (1) ten years after the date of grant, and (2) immediately upontermination of the Participant’s Service for cause.  The Board’s good faith determination of whether the terminationof a Director Participant’s Service was for cause shall be binding for purposesof the Plan.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**the Company has caused this Amendment tobe executed by its duly authorized officer this 24th day of October,2001.

 

 

**HPSC,INC.**

 
| By:    | /s/ John W. Everets       |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | John W. Everets           |
|   | Chairman of the Board and |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |
#### DRANE v. WITT.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
O AO 120 (Rev. 2/99) 

TO:

Commissioner of Patents

P.O. Box 1450

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450

REPORT ON THE

FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN

ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR

TRADEMARK

In Compliance with 35 § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been

filed in the U.S. District Court Colorado on the following Patents

DOCKET NO. DATE FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT

11-cv-2519 9/27/11 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT

TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. Tracbeam, L.L.C.

PATENT OR DATE OF PATENT HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1 Please see copy of Complaint attached hereto

 2

 3 .

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s) have been included:

DATE INCLUDED INCLUDED BY

G Amendment G Answer G Cross Bill G Other Pleading

PATENT OR DATE OF PATENT 

OR TRADEMARK HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK

 1

 2

 3.

 4

 5

In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:

DECISION/JUDGEMENT

CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE

GREGORY C. LANGHAM

Copy 1—Upon initiation of action, mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copy to

Copy 2—Upon filing document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Commissioner Copy 4—Case file copy

Case 1:11-cv-02519-WYD-MJW Document 2 Filed 09/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-PO-00149-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. MARK L. HALPER,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

Counsel for the Defendant contacted the Magistrate Judge’s office on behalf of the

Defendant and requested that the Arraignment scheduled for January 3, 2012 be moved to January

4th or 5th to assist the Defendant in scheduling his return flight to Colorado, therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Arraignment scheduled for January 3, 2012 at 3:00

p.m. be VACATED and RESCHEDULED for January 4, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.

DATED: December 14, 2011. 

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-po-00149-DW Document 8 Filed 12/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 13, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0375. MUKESH PATEL v. BC 35 LLC. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 20GC01964
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00390-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

HUGO VALDEZ-MUNOZ,

a/k/a Manuel Esparza-Munoz,

a/k/a Christian Valdez Vargas,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING SENTENCING OF DEFENDANT

At the Sentencing Hearing held on April 12, 2012, it was ORDERED that

Defendant Hugo Valdez-Munoz is sentenced to time served.

DATED: April 12 , 2012

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge
1 “[#79]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02523-REB-CBS

BRITTANY THURMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPUTY ARTHUR PETERSON, individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer

and as an Employee and/or agent of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Jefferson

County, and the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force,

JOHN DOES 1-10, whose names and identities and culpability in the instant matter are

yet unknown, individually and in their capacity as governmental officers or employees;

peace officers; and/or agents of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office; the Lakewood

Police Department; the City of Lakewood; the Jefferson County Auto Theft Task Force

and/or the State of Colorado.

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulated Dismissal Pursuant To FED. R. CIV.

P. 41 [#79]1 filed March 1, 2013. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I

conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be

dismissed.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulated Dismissal Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P. 41 [#79] filed

March 1, 2013, is APPROVED;

2. That the Final Pretrial Conference and the Trial Preparation Conference set

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 80 Filed 03/04/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

for December20, 2013, are VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence January 6, 2014, is VACATED;

4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot;

5. That this action is DISMISSED;

6. That the plaintiff and defendants SHALL PAY their own attorney fees; and

7. That defendant Arthur Peterson is AWARDED his costs to be taxed by the

clerk of the court under FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated March 4, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02523-REB-CBS Document 80 Filed 03/04/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-2548

___________________________

David Anthony Stebbins

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Legal Aid of Arkansas

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: December 4, 2013

Filed: December 9, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

David Stebbins appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to set aside

1

judgment on the ground of judicial bias. After careful review, we hold that the court

The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Western District of Arkansas.
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion because no exceptional

circumstances warranted relief from the judgment, see Harley v. Zoesch, 413 F.3d

866, 871 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard for granting Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion), and

Stebbins did not make a showing of judicial bias by pointing to adverse rulings in

other cases he has brought, see Am. Prairie Constr. Co. v. Hoich, 560 F.3d 780, 789-

90 (8thCir. 2009) (movant bearssubstantial burden of proving judicial partiality); see

also In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1290-91, 1295 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (court has

discretion to place reasonable filing restrictions on litigant who flagrantly and

repeatedly abuses judicial process by filing numerous meritless lawsuits).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02492-BNB

MARIA A. ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

VEOLIA TRANSPORATION, 

Defendant.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

On completion of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1C, it

appears that this case is not appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case

will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1D. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED November 2, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02492-PAB-KMT Document 7 Filed 11/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 15, 2014 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00363-CV 

COREY EASLEY, Appellant 

V. 

TAMICA BATTIE, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 13-15632 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

 By motion filed April 29, 2014 appellant informs us he no longer desires to prosecute the 

appeal and moves to dismiss it. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). 

 

140363F.P05 

 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

COREY EASLEY, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00363-CV V. 

TAMICA BATTIE, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 13-15632. 

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. 

Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER that appellee Tamica Battie recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Corey Easley. 

Judgment entered May 15, 2014 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 10.8


The Company has maintained the American Express Pay for Performance
Deferral Program each year since 1994-99 as described below:

              Description of Pay for Performance Deferral Program

     The Pay for Performance Deferral Program permits eligible participants to
defer annual compensation up to a maximum of one times base salary. Deferred
amounts are linked to Company performance until paid out. The program annually
credits interest equivalents to, or reduces the value of, deferred amounts
according to a schedule based on the reported annual return on equity ("ROE")
of American Express Company (the "Company"). The Compensation and Benefits
Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") may adjust the schedule
for major accounting changes, if the Company's ROE objectives change
significantly, or if the annual return on a benchmark treasury note falls
below or rises above a specified level. Deferred balances are reduced in value
if the annual ROE is zero or less for a given year. If a participant elects to
defer any compensation under this program, he or she must defer such
compensation for a least five years. The Committee may delay payments under
the program until they are fully deductible under Section 162(m) of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     The Partnership is a general partner in JMB-40 Broad
StreetAssociates,an Illinois general partnership which holds title to the
40 Broad Street Building.  The Partnership is a general partner in
RoyalExecutive Park-I, a New York general partnership which holds title to
the Royal Executive Park Office Complex.  Reference is made to Note 3 for
asummary description of the terms of such partnership agreements. 
ThePartnership's interest in the foregoing joint venture partnerships, and
the results of their operations are included in the consolidated
financialstatements of the Partnership filed with this annual report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,499,072
<SECURITIES>                                12,144,005
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,211,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (580,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,225,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,249,217
<PP&E>                                       6,036,076
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,301,804)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,007,282
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,284,651
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,879,456
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,843,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,007,282
<SALES>                                     47,300,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,300,200
<CGS>                                       30,357,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,357,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,063,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,292,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,800,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,492,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,492,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBJ Document 7 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBJ Document 7 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02605-RBJ Document 7 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3