alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

| (1)    | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/                William                Hartman                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| William                Hartman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Title:                Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting                Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| Date:                May 14, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community Bancorp. of our report dated January 10, 2003, included in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community Bancorp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-18535) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44713) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated January 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/A.M. Peisch & Company, LLP



March 29, 2004
St. Johnsbury, Vermont
VT Reg. No. 92-0000102
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date:
June 14, 2010

/s/CHRISTOPHER A. TWOMEY Christopher A. Twomey, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            2,107,758
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,231,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                        497,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,698,253
<PP&E>                                              445,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                      237,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,025,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,068,454
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             22,305
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,935,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,025,841
<SALES>                                           6,491,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6,491,032
<CGS>                                             4,426,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4,426,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,940,606
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (782,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (876,155)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (791,825)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.36)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Russell Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

    /s/ Russell Smith
        ------------
        Russell Smith
   Chief Executive Officer

February 8, 2010














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

      /s/ Brian Stewart
          -------------
          Brian Stewart
      Chief Financial Officer

February 8, 2010
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 6 -00 788 -CR Loz ar o M o r ale s T oc a a/k /a O r e sieM e s a a/k/aOr e st e M as a, App e lla nt v . The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 41,6 26 , HO NORAB LE JO E CARROLL , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N L ozaro Morale s Toca se eks to appea l from a judgment of convic tion for indece ncy wi th a c hil d. Se nte nc e wa s im

po se d o n Se pte mbe r 8 , 199 2. To ca’s pr o s e “ no tic e of out of tim e a pp e a l” wa s f

ile d o n Se pte mbe r 21, 20 06 . Un de r t he c ir c ums tanc e s, we la c k ju ri sd ic tio n to dis po se of the purpor

ted appe al in any manner other than by dismiss ing it for

want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v . S tate , 9 81 S.W. 2d

20 8 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 98 ); O l i v o v . Stat e , 91 8 S. W. 2 d 5 1 9 , 5 2 2 - 2 3 ( T e x. Crim. App. 1996).

The a ppeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: January

25, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Sean J. Austin     
|                   |  |  |  | Sean J. Austin,        
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Lashway et al. *v.*Fulton, Supt. of Banks, et al.

(No. 25307

Decided May 8, 1935.)

*Mr. Benjamin F. James*and *Mr. Silas E. Hurin,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Alva W. Bachman*and *Messrs. Bowman & James,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
811 A.2d 909

#### IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 26, 2002.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that MARTIN C. LATINSKY of HAWORTH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective May 1, 2002, by Order of this Court filed April 5, 2002, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 10, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.211 Municipal Securities and Loans** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Richard F. LOOMIS, Jr., Appellant, v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 5152.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco.

July 13, 1972.

Andress & Woodgate, Dallas, for appellant.

Schroeder, Guest & Hoffmeyer, Dallas, for appellee.

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant Loomis from judgment for plaintiff National Surety, for $150 subsequent year premium (plus $200 attorney’s fees), on two indemnity bonds written by plaintiff for defendant, to Southwest Land Title Company.

Loomis had a judgment against him for attorney’s fees in a divorce case which had been superseded on appeal. Southwest Land Title Company was unwilling to issue title policies on two land transactions Loomis desired to close, unless it was indemnified against costs which might arise from that judgment; and Loomis indemnified Southwest with two indemnity bonds written by plaintiff. Loomis paid the first year premium on these two bonds ($100 on the 1st; $50 on the 2nd), and this suit was brought by National Surety for 3 years additional premiums on each bond ($300 on the 1st; $150 on the 2nd), plus attorney’s fees. Plaintiff sued on the two written applications signed by Loomis.

Trial was before the court which rendered judgment for plaintiff for $150, plus $200 attorney’s fees.

*869Defendant appeals contending: 1) There is no evidence to sustain the judgment; 2) There is no theory of law upon which the judgment can be sustained.

The applications for surety bonds which defendant signed provide defendant agreed “To pay the Surety in advance

> $_ as the premium for the first year * * * and the same amount annually thereafter until the Surety shall be discharged or released from any and all liability ***.// *the amount of the premium for the first year be not inserted in the blank space above, such premium shall be computed and paid in accordance with the Surety’s regular manual of rates effective at the date of the execution of said Bond”.*

The application further provided defendant liable for attorney’s fees plaintiff might sustain by reason of having executed the bond.

The space providing the amount of the first year’s premium was left blank. The witness Fritz testified in effect that the “manual” called for an annual premium of $100 per year on one of the bonds and $50 per year on the other bond. Witness Fritz contradicted herself in some particulars, but we think the trial court authorized to view her testimony as summarized above.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law were not requested. In such event the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed if it can be upheld on any legal theory that finds support in the evidence. Bishop v. Bishop, Tex., 359 S.W.2d 869, Seaman v. Seaman, Tex., 425 S.W.2d 339.

The statement of facts as a whole, considering the evidence most favorable to the judgment, and disregarding evidence contradictory in its nature, is sufficient to support the judgment.

Defendant’s points are overruled.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02559-RBJ-BNB

LEONE S. CORYELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOE I. LASLEY and RAM TRUCKING, INC., a Wyoming Corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial 

scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after all responsive pleadings are filed. Each 

party’s lead trial counsel shall attend the conference. The conference shall be held in Courtroom 

A-702, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties are 

directed to jointly contact Mary DeRosa by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at 

Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. 

A meeting for the purposes of attempting to agree on a scheduling order and satisfying 

the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) should be held no later than 21 days before the 

proposed scheduling order is tendered. The proposed scheduling order, which should be 

prepared as described in Appendix F to the local rules, should be tendered no later than five days 

before the scheduling conference. The proposed scheduling order should set forth the parties’

agreement or their respective positions on the matters set forth in Appendix F. A copy of 

instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form scheduling order can be 

downloaded from the Court’s website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx).

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02559-RBJ Document 8 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
|   **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Science, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Robert Melamede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1      

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/*Dr. Robert Melamede*Dr. Robert MelamedePresident and Chief Executive Officer

March 17, 2010

                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FORT THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02549-RPM 

CLARK WILSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COLORADO SPRINGS PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA, 

Defendant. 

______________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

______________________________________________________________________ 

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal 

with Prejudice, filed June 3, 2013. After careful review of the Stipulation and file, the 

Court has concluded that the Stipulation should be approved and that this action should 

be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

 

1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed June 3, 2013, is 

APPROVED; and 

 

2. That this action IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the Parties to pay 

their own attorney fees and costs; and 

 

3. All pending motions are denied as moot, and all scheduled Court dates 

and other deadlines are vacated as moot. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of June, 2013. 

 

 BY THE COURT: 

 s/Richard P. Matsch 

 ____________________________________ 

 Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02549-RPM Document 41 Filed 06/04/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ZAP (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven M. Schneider, as Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Steven M. Schneider
              Steven
                M. SchneiderTitle:  Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
                August 10, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-150-PB

Anh Thuy Nguyen

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for May 5, 2009 citing the need for additional

time to complete enrollment of the defendant in the diversion

program. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 5, 2009 to July 7, 2009. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00150-PB Document 17 Filed 04/28/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 27, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

June 23, 2009 at 3:00 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 28, 2009

cc: Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00150-PB Document 17 Filed 04/28/09 Page 2 of 2