alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Aof World Heart Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Jal S. Jassawalla, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation as of March 31, 2008.

 
| Dated:   July 16, 2008 |   | /s/ * Jal S. Jassawalla                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Jal  S. Jassawalla, President and Chief |
|                             |   | Executive  Officer                      |
|                             |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)          |

 

----

*******                **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### In the Matter of George Phillips, Petitioner, against Lee B. Mailler et al., Constituting the Board of Parole of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Schenectady County,

February 21, 1957.

*544
      *Gerald T. Hennessy*for petitioner.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (James O. Moore, Jr., Paul C. Reuss*and *J. Bruce MacDonald*of counsel), for respondents.

Charles M. Hughes, J.

This is an application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the determination of the New York State Board of Parole, which denied parole to the petitioner.

Upon the return date of the order to show cause, the court held the matter and thereafter appointed Gerald T. Hennessy, Esq., as counsel for the petitioner. A hearing was had in the proceedings on the 8th day of January of the present year.

The facts are as follows: The petitioner was indicted by a Grand Jury in New York County for the crimes of robbery first degree; grand larceny, first degree; assault, first degree; criminally carrying a concealed and loaded pistol; and criminally possessing a pistol after a prior conviction.

He was tgied in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York on the above indictment and on November 24, 1941 was convicted by the verdict of a jury of the crime of robbery in the first degree. On December 29 of that year, the court sentenced the petitioner to a term of 30 to 60 years for a crime of robbery in the first degree. He was also given an additional sentence of from 5 to 10 years for possessing a gun, making a combined sentence of 35 to 70 years.

By having his minimum term reduced to 20 years, he is eligible to meet the Parole Board after serving 13 years and 4 months, provided he did not lose any good-time credits. (See Correction Law, § 230.)

The apparent purpose of chapter 584 of the Laws of 1956 (amdg. Penal Law, § 1945, subd. 2) was to reduce a prisoner’s minimum term so that he could be considered for parole. There is no direction in the statute that a prisoner be released after serving 20 years. Once a person comes under the jurisdiction of the Parole Board, he is then within the discretion of that agency as to whether or not such a person should be paroled. Parole is a matter of grace and not of right. (See *People ex rel. Cecere*v. *Jennings,*250 N. Y. 239.) At page 241 of the opinion, we find the following: *“*Parole is not a right, but a privilege, to be granted or withheld as discretion may impel ”.

*545There is no evidence in this proceeding that the Parole Board violated any positive statutory requirement. That being so, this court may not review the board’s action or failure to act. .(See *Matter of Hines*v. *State Board of Parole,*293 N. Y. 254.) At page 258 of the opinion, Judge Conway states the following: “ The only question presented, therefore, is one of discretion since there has been no failure to comply with statutory requirements. Matters of discretion affecting parole from the State prisons and Elmira Reformatory have not been confided to the courts. ’ ’

Relying upon the statute, and the case law of the State, the court is compelled to dismiss the petition.

Submit order.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002



Paul R. Hays and Keith A. Butler hereby certify that:



|1. |  | They are the chief executive officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Synbiotics Corporation.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The Form 10-K report of Synbiotics Corporation that this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | The information contained in the Form 10-K report of Synbiotics Corporation that this certification accompanies fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Synbiotics Corporation.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 28, 2004



/s/    PAUL R.
HAYSPaul R.
Hays/s/    KEITH A.
BUTLERKeith A.
Butler
#### Norris CHESSER, Jimmie Tilles, and Simon Wilkinson, as Members and Trustees of the Bethany Missionary Baptist Church, etc., Appellants, v. Alfred JOHNS, Marvin Cone, and Jesse Wilkinson, as Trustees and Representatives, etc., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Feb. 4, 1955.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1955.

Walton & Walton, J. V. Walton and Kate L. Walton, Palatka, for appellants.

P. B. Huff and J. H. Milligan, Jr., Palatka, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Epperson v. Myers, Fla., 58 So.2d 150.

MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the following advisory committee meeting.

*Name:*                         National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) Standards Subcommittee.                    

*Time and Date:*                         October 14, 2008 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Radisson Hotel Reagan National Airport, 2020 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Status:*                         Open.                    

*Purpose:*                         The NCVHS Standards Subcommittee will hold a half day meeting to plan and discuss upcoming topics for hearings and recommendations.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Substantive program information as well as summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be obtained from Denise Buenning, lead staff for Standards Subcommittee, NCVHS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of E-Health Standards and Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Room S2-26-17, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, telephone (410) 786-6711; or Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4245. Further information also is available on the NCVHS home page:                         *http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​*, where an agenda will be posted when available.                    

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible.

Dated: September 30, 2008.

 James Scanlon,

 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Science and Data Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. E8-23532 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-05-P
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED,

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2018-1831

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

00116.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, 

McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN; 

MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores, 

CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH J.

WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Angeles, CA.

 PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2022
intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS 

W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY 

DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N.

PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

December 7, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(C)

     [LOGO]
     3300 Highway # 7, Suite 904, Concord, Ontario L4M 4K3


                                                        Brian E. Levy
                                                        President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                     Direct: (905) 760-9708

February 15, 2000

Mr. Douglas C. Saunders
3300 Highway # 7
Suite 904
Concord, ON
L4K 4M3

Dear Doug:
                       Re: Amendment to Employment Letter

     This letter confirms the following amendments to the letter agreement
between you and InterTAN, Inc. (the "Company") dated March 10, 1995 concerning
your employment arrangements with the Company (the "Agreement"):

  1. The last sentence of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the phrase
     "State of Texas" and replacing it by the phrase "Province of Ontario" so
     that such sentence now reads: "This Agreement shall be governed by the laws
     of the Province of Ontario."

2.   The Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following clause to
     the Agreement:

     "Change of Control
      -----------------
     In the event that you are either:
           (i)  involuntarily terminated; or
          (ii)  there is a material reduction in the scope or level of your
                duties, responsibilities or the effective authority associated
                with your position within an eighteen (18) month period
                following a "change of control" (as such term is defined in the
                Company's Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended) of the
                Company,

     you shall be entitled to receive severance benefits in an amount equal to
     twelve (12) months of your then current base salary and base bonus, payable
     in one single lump sum payment, and shall be entitled to the continuation
     of Company paid health, dental and life insurance (then in effect, whether
     group or non-group) benefits for such 12 month period."
<PAGE>

          All other terms of your Agreement remain in full force and effect and
unamended.  Nothing herein modifies or otherwise amends any of your rights and
entitlements under any other of the Company's plans and programs in which you
participate, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
1986 Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the Deferred Compensation
Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Program.

            If the foregoing is acceptable, please sign and return a copy of
this letter to the attention of the undersigned.


                                       Sincerely,
                                       InterTAN, Inc.

                                       /s/ Brian E. Levy

                                       By: Brian E. Levy
                                           President and Chief
                                           Executive Officer

Agreed to and Accepted
this 21st day of February, 2000.


/s/ Douglas C. Saunders
___________________________
Douglas C. Saunders
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Corporation


The following bank subsidiary is a national bank and is organized under the laws
of the United States:

         First National Bank in Manitowoc

The following non-bank subsidiaries are organized under the laws of the State of
Wisconsin and are subsidiaries of First National Bank in Manitowoc:

         United Financial Services, Inc. (data center subsidiary)
         Insurance Center of Manitowoc, Inc. (insurance agency subsidiary)

The following non-bank subsidiary is organized under the laws of the State of
Nevada and is a subsidiary of First National Bank in Manitowoc:

         FNBM Investment Corp. (investment subsidiary)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00470

- CR

RAMON ALBERTO GONZAL EZ QUIROGA A/K/A RAMON ALBERTO QUIROG A GONZALEZ

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2016

- DCR

- 239

- D

JUDGMENT
THE T HIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance

. December 21, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

*****************************SEALED CASE *******************************

Case Number 11-SW-05438-MJW

IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF:

2260 Palm Drive, Unit C

Colorado Springs CO 80918

ORDER

(DN 7)

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Letter captioned “Affidavit - Request for

Information” (docket no. 7) filed by Requesters George Thomas Brokaw, John Joseph

Pawelski and Mimi Michelle Vigil is STRICKEN for the following reasons. The Letter is

an ex parte communication with the court which is prohibited under D.C.COLO.LCivR

77.2 and not authorized under D.C.COLO.LCrR 17.2. If Requesters George Thomas

Brokaw, John Joseph Pawelski and Mimi Michelle Vigil seek relief from this court, then

each Requester shall file, with the court, a written motion with legal authority cited

therein and shall serve of copy of such motion upon the United States Attorney for the

District of Colorado. Lastly, there is no Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure, no Local

Rule of Practice, no Constitutional authority and no case law that allows a Requester to

seek answers to interrogatories [written questions] from a judicial officer. A judicial

officer is defined under D.C.COLO.LCrR 1.1 F. Judicial Officer. A judicial officer refers

to a district judge or to a magistrate judge. 

SIGNED AND DATED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael J. Watanabe 

MICHAEL J. WATANABE

US Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-sw-05438-MJW Document 8 Filed 09/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
A

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-1 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

3
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-1 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of

3
Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 82-1 filed 11/18/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of

3
<PAGE>


                                     EXHIBIT 11.1

                                     SCOOP, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

                                   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                             THREE MONTHS
                                                                                             ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                                      1996                1997
                                                                                      ----                ----
<S>                                                                                <C>                 <C>        
Weighted average shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      2,517,000           2,826,000
Conversion of redeemable common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            927,000
Equivalent shares from the assumed exercise of options and warrants . . . . . .        363,000             363,000
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
Weighted average shares used in calculation of net loss per share . . . . . . .      2,880,000           4,116,000
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $  (175,200)        $  (567,700)
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
Net loss applicable to common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        $  (622,200)
                                                                                                       -----------
                                                                                                       -----------
Net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $     (0.06)        $     (0.15)
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
                                                                                   -----------         -----------
</TABLE>

                                       15
EXHIBIT 99.A




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2002, of New Generation Holdings,  Inc. (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Jacques  Mot,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify (i) that the Report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Jacques Mot
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Jacques Mot
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       August 19, 2002
| Skip to Content*Release Date: March 10, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**L.117 Life Insurance Companies** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
June 11, 2021
No. 04

- 21

- 00146

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.M. AND M.J.C., CHILDREN , From the 224th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00682 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant has filed a motion for a twenty

- day extension of time to file a brief. We grant the motion and order appellant’s brief filed by June 29, 2021

. This is an accelerated appeal of an order in a suit for termination of the parent

- child relationship that must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed in the trial court. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of June, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
#### George F. ACOSTA, Doing Business as Acosta Cleaners, v. Mrs. Janis SMITH et al.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 15, 1945.

Weber & Croom, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Justin C. Daspit and Blumfield & Herbert, all of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Acosta v. Smith et al. and Butler v. Smith, La.App., 23 So.2d 742.

It is ordered that the judgment herein appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed at the cost of plaintiff in both courts.