alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
815 A.2d 418

#### IN THE MATTER OF AGUSTIN SANCHEZ, A JUDGE OF THE UNION CITY MUNICIPAL COURT.

February 7, 2003.

ORDER

The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed a presentment recommending that AGUSTIN SANCHEZ, a Judge of the Municipal Court of Union City, be publicly reprimanded for violations of *Canons*7A(3) and 7C of the *Code of Judicial Conduct (A Judge Shall Refrain From Political Activity), Rule*1:17 — 1(h) (prohibiting partisan political activity by all persons employed by or regularly assigned to a municipal court), *Rule*1:18 (requiring judges to enforce the provisions of *Rule*1:17), and *Rules*2:15-8(a)(5) and (6) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute);

And respondent, through counsel, having waived his right to a hearing before the Supreme Court and having consented to the *333imposition of the sanction recommended by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the presentment of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct is adopted, and JUDGE AGUSTIN SANCHEZ is hereby publicly reprimanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of the Company for the six month period ended June 30, 1998
and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by,
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,425,427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,496,308<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,419,219<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,813,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,156
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    30,725,064
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,871,682)<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,813,889
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,447<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               497,114<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (493,250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
<FN>
<F1>Includes prepaid expenses and other current assets of $55,075.
<F2>Consists of properties and equipment, net of depreciation of $1,128,114;
mineral properties of $23,291,105; and other long-term assets of $898,362.
<F3>Consists of $3,871,682 of deficit accumulated during the development stage.
<F4>Consists of interest income of $24,447.
<F5>Consists of general and administrative expenses of $488,707 and other 
expenses of $8,407.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-93,573-01 AND WR-93,573-02

EX PARTE KEVIN JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W401-80295-2018-HC AND W401-82548-2019-HC 

IN THE 401ST DISTRICT COURT 

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. According

to the record, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on March 21, 2022, but the transcript of the

hearing was not forwarded to this Court. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure, a reporter is required to transcribe a hearing within fifteen days of its conclusion and then

to immediately forward the transcript to the district clerk in the county of conviction. Id. at § 3(d). 

After receiving the transcript, the district clerk is required to forward it, among other things, to this

Court. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4).
2

The district clerk shall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case with a copy of this order and

then either forward to this Court the transcript of the evidentiary hearing or certify in writing that the

reporter has not transcribed the hearing. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty

days from the date of this order.

Filed: September 26, 2022

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00368-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On May 23, 2012, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference to reset

the sentencing hearing in this matter. After conferring with the parties and with their

consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on August 17, 2012, commencing at 11:00 a.m., the court shall conduct

the sentencing hearing in this matter; and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing.

Dated: May 23, 2012

1

 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

Case 1:11-cr-00368-REB Document 36 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02530-WJM Document 7 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02530-WJM Document 7 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02530-WJM Document 7 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  ------------


                            SUBSIDIARIES OF COMPANY



Name and jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each subsidiary:
<TABLE>

<S>                                                        <C>
  Calmar-Albert Belgium S.A............................... Belgium

  Calmar-Albert Italia S.r.l.............................. Italy

  Calmar-Albert France S.A.R.L............................ France

  Calmar-Albert GmbH...................................... Germany

  Calmar-Albert (U.K.) Ltd................................ England

  Calmar International, Inc............................... Virgin Islands

  Calmar Plastics Limited................................. Canada

  Monturas, S.A........................................... Spain

  Calmar Mercosur, S.A.................................... Argentina

  Calmar do Brasil LTDA................................... Brazil

  Calmar Wuxi Dispensing Systems Ltd...................... China
</TABLE>
  All Subsidiaries are foreign subsidiaries.


The Company owns 100% of all Subsidiaries except as follows:


  1. Monturas, S.A., in which one share is owned by C. Richard Huebner.


  2. Calmar-Albert GmbH, of which the Company owns 60.80%, Calmar-Albert (U.K.)
     Ltd. owns 17.58%, and Calmar Plastics Limited owns 21.62%.


  3. Calmar-Albert Belgium S.A., of which the Company owns 95.04% and Calmar-
     Albert (U.K.) Ltd. owns 4.96%.


  4. Calmar-Albert Italia S.r.l., of which the Company owns 99.00% and Calmar-
     Albert (U.K.) Ltd. owns 1.00%.


  5. Calmar do Brasil LTDA, of which the Company owns 99.00% and Monturas, S.A.
     owns 1.00%.


  6. Calmar Mercosur, S.A., of which the Company owns 99.00% and C. Richard
     Huebner owns 1.00%.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7601** 

RODERICK ENGLISH , Petitioner

– Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00127

- JFA )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KIN G , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Jerome English seeks to appeal the district

court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1)(B) (2012) . The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised English that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 4 6 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). English has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny English’s pending motions, and dism iss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENT that the individuals whose signatures appear
below, in their capacities as officers and directors of Immunex Corporation,
hereby constitute and appoint David A. Mann their true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, to sign on behalf of the
undersigned Immunex's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 1999 fiscal year
pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and to file
the same, with exhibits thereto and any other documents in connection therewith,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of the undersigned does hereby
ratify and confirm all that such attorney-in-fact may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Signature                                     Title               Date
---------                                     -----               ----
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>
/s/ Kirby L. Cramer
-----------------------------------           Director            FEBRUARY 17, 2000
(Kirby L. Cramer)


/s/ Robert I. Levy
-----------------------------------           Director            FEBRUARY 17, 2000
(Robert I. Levy)


/s/ John E. Lyons
-----------------------------------           Director            FEBRUARY 17, 2000
(John E. Lyons)


/s/ Joseph M. Mahady
-----------------------------------           Director            FEBRUARY 24, 2000
(Joseph M. Mahady)


/s/ Edith W. Martin
-----------------------------------           Director            FEBRUARY 17, 2000
(Edith W. Martin)

</TABLE>



                                       87
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR 
THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6904
<SECURITIES>                                      9960
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8592
<ALLOWANCES>                                       532
<INVENTORY>                                         53
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 27631
<PP&E>                                            3578
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   44104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                       37440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     37490
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (152)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35
<INCOME-TAX>                                        54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (19)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (19)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[No. 34475.

Department One.

April 17, 1958.]

#### David Kuyath, *Respondent,*v. Anderson Construction Company, *Appellant.**1*

*Dale W. Read,*for appellant.

*Wilkinson, Gadbow & Frank (John Wilkinson,*of counsel) , for respondent.

1

Reported in 324 P. (2d) 264.

Finley, J.

The defendant, Anderson Construction Company, was the prime contractor on the construction of a fish cultural station for the United States fish and wild life service at Carson, Washington. The plaintiff, David Kuyath, *175d/b/a Columbia Excavating Company, was the excavation subcontractor on the job.

Upon completion of the work, a dispute arose between the parties over the amount owing to Kuyath. Eventually, Kuyath filed suit for a claimed balance of $12,228.25. Anderson Construction Company filed an answer and cross-complaint, alleging that Kuyath had breached the contract by reason of untimely performance, and claiming damages in excess of $15,000.

The trial court entered judgment for Kuyath in the amount of $7,275.09 and dismissed the Anderson Construction Company’s cross-complaint with prejudice. Anderson Construction Company has appealed.

With one exception, appellant’s assignments of error relate to findings of fact. Since the findings of fact are supported by the record, we will not disturb them. *Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald*(1957), 50 Wn. (2d) 684, 314 P. (2d) 622.

The remaining assignment of error relates to the trial court’s exclusion of evidence which was offered by appellant to prove general damages resulting from Kuyath’s breach of the contract. The trial court found that there had been no breach by Kuyath; therefore, if the exclusion of the proffered evidence was error, it was not prejudicial.

The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Hill, C. J., Mallery, Ott, and Hunter, JJ., concur.

September 16, 1958. Petition for rehearing denied.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59642-59643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Revocation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

[[Page 59643]]


ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker license is canceled with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       License
                Name                     No.          Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherri N. Boynton...................     10691  Los Angeles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
 [FR Doc. E8-24049 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 20, 2013

No. 04-13-00192-CV and 04-13-00193-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF S.S.,

A MENTALLY ILL PERSON,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-MH-0659 and 2013-MH-0591

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 24, 2013. On May 15, 2013, this court 

ordered appellant to file appellant’s brief no later than May 24, 2013. Our order cautioned 

appellant that if appellant failed to file the brief by this date, this appeal would be dismissed for 

want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant is represented on appeal by Mr. Michael 

Raign. On May 17, 2013, Mr. Raign requested an extension of time until June 8, 2013 in which 

to file the brief. We granted the request. However, neither the brief nor a second motion for 

extension of time has been filed.

Mr. Raign is hereby ORDERED to file appellant’s brief no later than July 8, 2013. No 

further extensions of time will be considered.

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Raign by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, and by regular United States mail. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of June, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1309 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on credit 

card accounts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal 

defaults on credit card accounts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Universal Default Pro5 hibition Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBIT UNIVERSAL DEFAULTS ON CREDIT CARD 

7 ACCOUNTS. 

8 Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1637) is amending by adding at the end the following new 

10 subsection: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1309 IS

1 ‘‘(i) UNIVERSAL DEFAULTS PROHIBITED.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No creditor may use any 

3 adverse information concerning any consumer, in4 cluding any information in any consumer report (as 

5 defined in section 603) or any change in the credit 

6 score of the consumer, as the basis for increasing 

7 any annual percentage rate of interest applicable to 

8 a credit card account of the consumer under an open 

9 end consumer credit plan, or to remove or increase 

10 any introductory annual percentage rate of interest 

11 applicable to such account, for reasons other than 

12 actions or omissions of the consumer that are di13 rectly related to such account. 

14 ‘‘(2) NOTICE TO CONSUMER.—The limitation 

15 under paragraph (1) on the use of adverse informa16 tion by a credit card issuer shall be clearly and con17 spicuously described to the consumer by the credit 

18 card issuer in any disclosure or statement required 

19 under subsection (a) or (b).’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No.'s 333-42763, 333-63341, 333-90465 and 333-90493)
and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s 33-24444, 33-55992, 33-
85908, 33-61103, 333-18363, 333-42723 and 333-90471) of Synbiotics Corporation
of our report dated March 3, 2000 which appears in this Form 10-KSB.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Diego, California
April 10, 2000
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the  Company.

This 11th day of August, 2004.


/S/ JUDY B. TURNER
------------------
Judy B. Turner
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer


<PAGE>