alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1301 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 132
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1301

  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2007

Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                              May 4, 2007

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Right-to-Work Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    (a) Rights of Employees.--Section 7 of the National Labor Relations 
Act (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ``except to'' and all that 
follows through ``authorized in section 8(a)(3)''.
    (b) Unfair Labor Practices.--Section 8 of the National Labor 
Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ``: Provided, That'' 
        and all that follows through ``retaining membership'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or to 
                discriminate'' and all that follows through ``retaining 
                membership''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ``covered by an 
                agreement authorized under subsection (a)(3) of this 
                section''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking clause (2) and 
        redesignating clauses (3) and (4) as clauses (2) and (3), 
        respectively.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

    Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) is amended by 
striking paragraph Eleven.
                                                       Calendar No. 132

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1301

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to 
  form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 4, 2007

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### Joseph Bruno, as Coexecutor of Anna Bruno, Deceased, Respondent, v James Bruno, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff, as coexecutor of his mother’s estate, brought an equitable action to set aside a deed of the family home from his mother, Anna Bruno, to defendant, another son. The deed was given to defendant in October 1978, about six months before Anna Bruno’s death at the age of 92. The property was valued at $30,000 to $35,000. The deed recited consideration of $5,000, although defendant contended that bills totaling over $16,000 that he had paid for his mother constituted additional consideration. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that Anna Bruno was of unsound mind and failing health when she executed the deed, that there was no consideration, and that the conveyance should be set aside as the product of undue influence.

*967The court erred in setting aside the transfer as the product of undue influence. Although not explicitly so stated, the court effectively shifted the burden of proof, requiring that defendant prove the absence of undue influence. That was error. To warrant the shifting of the burden of the proof, there must be proof of incapacitation and proof of a fiduciary or confidential relationship (see, *Matter of Camarda,*63 AD2d 837). Both elements are lacking here, and the burden of proof therefore remained on plaintiff to prove undue influence *(cf., Matter of Camarda, supra; Noto v Sparacio,*56 AD2d 840). Because plaintiff presented no proof that defendant exercised undue influence over his mother with respect to that transaction, the court erred in setting aside the transaction. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Sedita, J.—set aside conveyance.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 21, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.116 Property-Casualty Insurance Companies** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED FILED COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO DENVER, COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02432-BNB SEP 2.0 2011
(Removal from Colorado Supreme Court Case No. 2011-SA-200)
GREGORY C. LANGHAM

LEROY W. BAKER, #82907, CLERK

Plaintiff,
v.

TOM CLEMENTS, Dir., D.O.C., and
KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Ster. Corr. Fac.,

Defendants.

ORDER FOR SUMMARY REMAND

Plaintiff, Leroy W. Baker, filed pro se a document titled “Removal of Cases from
State to Federal Court Pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 throu [sic] 1446 + F.R.C.P. Ru
[sic] 81.” The Court must construe Mr. Baker's filings liberally because he is
representing himself. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v.
Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). However, the Court should not be the
pro se litigant’s advocate. Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110. For the reason stated below, this
action will be remanded summarily to the Colorado Supreme Court.

The Court has reviewed the Notice of Removal and finds that it is deficient. Mr.
Baker seeks to remove Case No. 2011-SA-200, a habeas corpus action filed by Mr.
Baker in the Colorado Supreme Court. Only a defendant in a state court action may
remove an action from state court to the federal district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
Mr. Baker has also failed to provide “a short and plain statement of the grounds for

removal, together with a copy of all process, pleadings, and orders served upon such


defendant or defendants in such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). Therefore, this action
will be remanded summarily to the Colorado Supreme Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this action is remanded summarily to the Colorado Supreme
Court. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall mail a certified copy of
this order to the clerk of the Colorado Supreme Court. Itis

FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 20" day of September , 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T, Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court



IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02432-BNB

Leroy W Baker

Prisoner No. 82907
Sterling Correctional Facility
PO Box 6000

Sterling, CO 80751

Christopher T Ryan
Colorado Supreme Court
101 W Colfax Ave Suite 800
Denver, CO 80202

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 20, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:

“Deputy Clerk
1

“[#7]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02666-REB-BNB

CPN II OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHERYL A. MOSS,

FIRSTBANK OF TECH CENTER,

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

STATE OF COLORADO - DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, and

GEORGE KENNEDY, as Public Trustee of Douglas County Colorado,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss [#7]1

 filed November 3,

2011. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and

that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss [#7] filed November 3, 2011, is GRANTED;

and

2. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated November 4, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02666-REB-BNB Document 8 Filed 11/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Dynatronics Corporation on Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry M. Atkinson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: September 25, 2009         /s/ Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Kelvyn H. Cullimore, Jr.
                               Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)
                               Dynatronics Corporation



Date: September 25, 2009         /s/ Terry M. Atkinson
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Terry M. Atkinson, CPA
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
                               Dynatronics Corporation



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Criminal Case No. 11-CR-0416-RBJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

1. MALCOLM REID MCDONALD, JR.,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

Entered by Judge R. Brooke Jackson

A Notice of Disposition was filed on November 15, 2011 [Docket No.10]. The Trial 

Preparation Conference set for December 9, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. is now converted to a Change 

of Plea hearing. Counsel for the parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea 

documents separately to Chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours 

before the change of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, 

counsel shall bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement 

in advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by D.C.COLO.LCrR 

11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall also include a separate section identifying 

each essential element required by law for the commission of each criminal offense to which the 

defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. 

DATED this 15th day of November, 2011.
#### Betty Moss CORBIN, Appellant, v. LINZ BROTHERS INC., Appellee.

No. 4569.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

Oct. 11, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1972.

Gordon Asbury, Jr., Abilene, for appellant.

Lester O. Berg, Jack H. Bryant, Abilene, for appellee.

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

This is a default judgment case where the defendant, Betty Moss Corbin, following the entry of judgment filed a motion for new trial alleging that she had not been personally served with citation.

The plaintiff, Linz Brothers, Inc., sued both Betty Moss Corbin and her husband, Joe A. Corbin. Linz alleged that it sold three diamond rings to Joe A. Corbin; that he executed promissory notes in payment; and, that he also executed a security agreement and financing statement. Linz further alleged that Betty Moss Corbin had possession of the rings and was claiming title to them. Plaintiff sought foreclosure of its security agreement against both defendants and also a personal judgment against Joe A. Corbin for the balance due. Neither defendant answered and judgment by default was entered against both defendants for foreclosure of the security agreement and for money damages. The court overruled Betty Moss Corbin’s motion for new trial and she has appealed. Joe A. Corbin has not appealed.

Linz concedes that its pleadings will not support a money judgment against Betty Moss Corbin but argues that the foreclosure portion of the judgment should be affirmed. We agree.

*943Betty Moss Corbin contends that she was never personally served with citation. We do not reach the service of citation question because we think Betty Moss Corbin was required to properly allege and prove that she had a meritorious defense and she failed to discharge this requirement. McEwen v. Harrison, 162 Tex. 125, 345 S.W.2d 706 (1961); Ivy v. Carrell, 407 S.W.2d 212 (Tex.Sup.1966); Ward v. Nava, 483 S.W.2d 510 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston 1972, writ granted Oct. 4, 1972).

The pleadings will not support a money judgment against Betty Moss Corbin. We therefore reform the judgment and delete that portion awarding plaintiff money damages against Betty Moss Corbin. As reformed the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40915

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

FELIX OMAR CASTILLO-ANDINO, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:16-CR-55-1 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felix Omar CastilloAndino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castillo-Andino has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fif h Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40915 Document: 00513943684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2017
No. 16-40915

2 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40915 Document: 00513943684 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2017
Exhibit 99.02


I, Steven B. Graham, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sbarro, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report.

Date:  June 3, 2003


/s/ Steven B. Graham
---------------------------
Steven B. Graham,
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SBARRO,  INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SBARRO,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### JORGENSON v. JORGENSON.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### CAMPBELL v. CAMPBELL.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### Joseph DUKE, Appellant, v. MARCUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers Mutual Casualty Insurance Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 19, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

d0826 

# Order

Clerk 

### September 3, 2013

146658(12)

GEORGE C. BENTON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 146658

AGC: 0052

- 13

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 28, 2013

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JESUS GABRIEL CONDOM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-850

[January 14, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-014186-CF-10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DCB Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:   August 11, 2008
    /s/ John A. UstaszewskiJohn A. UstaszewskiTitle:
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 31.
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 2, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Rehearing No. 529 Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices 6 Nov 2006

126530-1

MICHIGAN CHIROPRACTIC COUNCIL, MICHIGAN CHIROPRACTIC SOCIETY, Petitioners-Appellees, SC: 126530-1 v COA: 241870, 241874 Ingham CC: 01-093481-AA COMMISSIONER OF THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICE, Respondent, and

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE and MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenors-Respondents-Appellants.

In this cause, a motion for rehearin g is considered and it is DENIED.

Weaver and Markman, JJ., would grant rehearing.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2, 2006
Clerk
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 21, 2005*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**R.100 Change in Net Worth of Households and Nonprofit Organizations** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### HUIE v. LEWIS.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Certiorari denied without opinion.