alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1311

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing in the North Aleutian Basin 
                 Planning Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2007

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing in the North Aleutian Basin 
                 Planning Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bristol Bay Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law and except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
        conduct of oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related 
        activities is prohibited in areas of the outer Continental 
        Shelf located in the North Aleutian Basin Planning Area.
            ``(2) Effect.--Nothing in this subsection affects any 
        rights under any lease issued under this Act before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection.''.

SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FROM COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY OF OUTER CONTINENTAL 
              SHELF OIL AND NATURAL GAS RESOURCES.

    Section 357(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
15912(a)) is amended by inserting after ``Continental Shelf'' the 
following: ``(other than the North Aleutian Basin Planning Area 
referred to in section 8(q)(1) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 
(43 U.S.C. 1337 (q)(1)))''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Stevens G. Nicholson, Respondent, v Samuel J. Lurie, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on or about April 6, 1989, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Shirley Fingerhood, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Asch and Smith, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02600-CMA-BNB

ROBIN TONETTE,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRT CORPORATION d/b/a PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATES COMPANY,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the

Stipulation To Dismiss Pursuant To Settlement (Doc. # 10), signed by the attorneys for

the parties hereto, it is

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without fees or

costs to either party.

DATED: February 06 , 2012

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02600-CMA-BNB Document 11 Filed 02/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Mark Van Valkenburgh, Respondent, v Frederick G. Koehler et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Mark Van Valkenburgh, Respondent, v Tops Friendly Markets, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously reversed *972on the law without costs and new trial granted. Memorandum: The court’s charge was erroneous in three respects and reversal of those judgments in which Tops Friendly Markets, Inc. was a defendant must be reversed. First, the court erred in failing to charge Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1195, thereby failing to instruct the jury that the blood alcohol test result of .01% was prima facie proof that defendant Frederick G. Koehler’s ability to drive was not impaired by alcohol and that he was not in an intoxicated condition. Having received evidence of the blood alcohol test result, the court should have instructed the jury with respect to evaluating its significance *(see,*PJI 2:20).

The court also erred in its charge with respect to the Dram Shop cause of action (General Obligations Law § 11-101). Liability under the Dram Shop Act exists only when an accident is caused by intoxication. The court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that an intoxicated person is one whose judgment is impaired, thereby allowing the jury to find that any degree of impairment, rather than impairment to the extent of incapability, was sufficient *(see generally, People v Cruz,*48 NY2d 419, 427-428, *appeal dismissed*446 US 901; 3 CJI[NY] V&TL 1192 [1], [2], [3], at 2302 *et seq; cf.,*General Obligations Law § 11-100 [1]).

The court further erred in submitting to the jury a negligence cause of action based on Tops’ illegal sale of beer to an under-age person, and charging that a violation of Penal Law § 260.20 may be considered evidence of Tops’ negligence; a violation of Penal Law § 260.20 (4) does not provide the basis for a civil remedy *(Sheehy v Big Flats Community Day,*73 NY2d 629, 636-637).

We further note that the court should have allowed objections during summations so that immediate curative action could have been taken as needed *(see generally, Layton Sales & Rentals v Somat Realty Corp.,*39 AD2d 640, *lv denied*31 NY2d 642; *People v Marcelin,*23 AD2d 368, 370). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—negligence and Dram Shop Act violation.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lowery, JJ.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Douglas Clinton Siddle, * Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding

No. 11-19-00161-CR * June 6, 2019

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

 This court has considered Douglas Clinton Siddle’s application for writ of 

habeas corpus and concludes that the application for writ of habeas corpus should 

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the application for habeas corpus is dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02596-MSK-KLM

PRIDE SERVICES, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipal corporation,

CALVIN BLACK, in his official capacity,

CALVIN (I) BLACK, in his individual capacity, and

ONE OR MORE JOHN DOES,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Plaintiff’s Motion to

Appear by Telephone During Scheduling Conference and Certification of Compliance

with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A) [Docket No. 19; Filed January 18, 2012] (the “Initial Motion”)

and Plaintiff’s Unopposed Plaintiff’s Motion to Appear by Telephone During

Scheduling Conference and Certification of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A)

[Docket No. 20; Filed January 18, 2012] (the “Amended Motion”). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Initial Motion [#19] is DENIED as moot. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Motion [#20] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s

counsel may appear by telephone at the Scheduling Conference on January 26, 2012 at

9:30 a.m. by dialing the Court at 303-335-2770. If any other parties are granted leave to

appear telephonically, these parties must initiate a conference call between themselves and

Plaintiff’s counsel before dialing the Court.

Dated: January 19, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02596-RM-KLM Document 23 Filed 01/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Gregory A. Gould, state and certify that, based on my knowledge:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended June 30,
2002 of Colorado MEDtech, Inc. (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Colorado
MEDtech, Inc.



Date: June 10, 2003



/s/ Gregory A. Gould
------------------------------
Name: Gregory A. Gould
Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          72,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,410,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    225,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,480,032
<PP&E>                                       4,553,399
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,946,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,326,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,567,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,004
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,552,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,326,074
<SALES>                                        119,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,543,994
<CGS>                                           99,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,261,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               166,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                182,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    97,246
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
(August 27, 1990)

#### In the Matter of Dolores Eaton et al., Respondents, v Jeanette Gadson et al., Respondents, and I. Ronnie Holly, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Evans, J.), entered on August 23, 1990, unanimously modified, on the law, so as to dismiss the petition of Dolores Eaton as untimely, and the judgment otherwise affirmed, *832without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21





Subsidiaries of the Registrant





AeroGo, Inc.


Incorporated in the state of Washington





Allegany Technology, Inc.


Incorporated in the state of Delaware





Evergreen Weigh, Inc.


Incorporated in the state of Washington





NV Technology, Inc.


Incorporated in the state of Nevada





Revere Transducers, Inc.


Incorporated in the state of Delaware





Revere Transducers Europe BV


Incorporated in the Netherlands





IDEAutomation International, Inc.


Incorporated in the Virgin Islands





AeroGo Expert I


Incorporated in Guam





AeroGo Export II


Incorporated in Guam





Loadline NV


Incorporated in the Netherlands
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Exchange Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Funk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Thomas E. Funk



Thomas E. Funk

Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2005
#### ANNA K. DAVID, APPELLANT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Submitted June 2, 1947

Decided September 12, 1947.

For the appellant, *Koestler & Koestler (Melvin J. Koest*ler, of counsel).

For the respondent, *Vincent D.*Manaban, *Jr.*

*196Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Michael Ordell OLIVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45578.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 12, 1972.

Guy H. McNeely, Wichita Falls (by Court appointment), for appellant.

Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty before the court on November 17, 1970, and was adjudged guilty of the offense of felony theft with punishment assessed at five years imprisonment. Imposition of sentence was suspended and the appellant was placed on probation.

On July 22, 1971, a hearing was conducted on the State’s motion to revoke probation, which alleged that the appellant had violated the condition of his probation that he “commit no offense against the laws of this state . . . ” in that the appellant “committed the offense of assault with intent to kill on the 19th day of February, 1971, in Wichita Falls, Wichita County, Texas.” The court found that the appellant had violated the terms of pro*875bation and entered an order revoking his probation and pronounced sentence on August 27, 1971.

The appellant’s contention is that there was an abuse of discretion in revoking probation before there was a final conviction for the offense which is the basis of the revocation. The law is well established contrary to the contention of the appellant. Malveaux v. State, 482 S.W.2d 872 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Carr v. State, 476 S.W.2d 329 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Bennett v. State, 476 S.W.2d 281 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Farmer v. State, 475 S.W.2d 753 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Mason v. State, 473 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.Cr.App.1971), and Hall v. State, 452 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Cr.App.1970).

The evidence shows that the appellant attacked Benito Rangel with “a board about one inch thick, four inches wide and about three feet long.” Rangel was hospitalized for about one month for treatment of head injuries received as a result of the attack.

We find no abuse of discretion in the revocation of probation.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENT  INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                               
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997            
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997            
<CASH>                                               0            
<SECURITIES>                                         0            
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,351,000            
<ALLOWANCES>                                   447,000            
<INVENTORY>                                  7,025,000            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,490,000            
<PP&E>                                         243,000            
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,000            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,900,000            
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,109,000            
<BONDS>                                              0            
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0            
<PREFERRED>                                          0            
<COMMON>                                        45,000           
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,723,000            
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,900,000            
<SALES>                                     21,782,000            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,782,000            
<CGS>                                       20,490,000            
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,490,000           
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0            
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,000            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (636,000)           
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (254,000)            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (382,000)           
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0            
<CHANGES>                                            0            
<NET-INCOME>                                  (382,000)           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.08)           
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)            
        


</TABLE>
1皿 1柵 |‖ lll11胴 IVIII

2011112355

12ノ 12/2011 1

3effe rson

COMBINED COURT. EFFERSON COUNTY COLORAD0

0ourt Address

100 efferson County Parkway

Golden, C0 80401‐ 6002

1144=15 AM l Page(s)

county′ CoLorado

R Sll.00

D 30.00

JUD flEo 0 5 2ol:

Nur「 ber: 1lCV-002134 r 5

Ca se

Dr v.

Plainti ff MAGNANI′ GEORGE

Defendant DALTON. MARIE

TRANSCRIPT OF OCMENT

Original udgment Amount S910.356 44 Judgment Date: November 18. 2011

Revi Ved udgment Amount_ 5 00 Judgment Date:

udgment Status UNSATISFIED

Additi ona] Rema rks

3UDGMENT PLUS ATTY'S FEES & COSTS T0 8E ASSESSED HEREAFT[R PLUS

POST― UDGMENTINTEREST FROM THE DATE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AT THE RATE OF 8% PER

ANNUM

Debtor(s) MARIE DALTON. 927 COLE STREET. GOLDEN, C0 80401

Creditor(s): GEORCE MACNANI

Balance of Judgment to Date $910.356 44

I hereby certrfy that the above ts a true and complete transcrlpt of the

Judgment rn the above- referenced case whlch 1s retained tn my offlce

 GOVERNMENT

 EXHIBIT

,

 15

DATE_ Decenber 01. 2011

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-15 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1

of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action: 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402

Date: September 27, 2013 Courtroom Deputy: Courtni Covington

Parties: Counsel:

USA, Tonya S. Andrews 

Plaintiff, 

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, Thomas E. Goodreid

and 2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN Nicole M. Quintana

#JTEES42A182076495,

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in session: 10:50 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Discussion between the court and counsel for Claimant Marie Dalton regarding the Notice of

Consent to Forfeiture filed in the case. In light of Claimant’s consent, counsel is excused.

The court addresses counsel for the Government and remaining Claimant regarding moving the case

forward. Counsel state the parties have agreed no discovery is needed and the Government is ready

to file a dispositive motion within 4 weeks. 

ORDERED: Government counsel shall file their dispositive pleading no later than

October 28, 2013.

The court notes a standard briefing schedule will apply.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 10:52 a.m.

Total time in court: 00:02

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 76 filed 09/27/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02437-MSK-KMT

ANDREA L. CHISHOLM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCK GARDENS RAFTING, INC., a Colorado corporation;

GLENWOOD CANYON ZIP LINE ADVENTURES, INC., a Colorado corporation;

JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL, an individual;

JEFFREY HALE, an individual,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF RECUSAL

 

THIS MATTER arises sua sponte. The undersigned finds that grounds exist pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 455 and the CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES which require her

recusal in this matter. In particular, one attorney in this matter represents the undersigned in an

action arising from a recent motor vehicle collision. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the undersigned judge hereby recuses herself from hearing this matter. 

The Clerk shall randomly reassign this case to another judge of this Court and shall appropriately

adjust the “draw” of future cases.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02437-RPM-KMT Document 41 Filed 06/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02468-RPM

PAUL GIVENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

NETJETS AVIATION, INC.,

NETJETS SALES, INC.,

BRUCE H. WHITE, and

RICARDO E. HELLEBUYCK, 

Defendants.

 

ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

 

Court having determined that a pretrial conference should now be scheduled, it is

ORDERED that a pretrial conference is scheduled for June 14, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in the

Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street,

Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation and

Submission of Final Pretrial Order which may be found at

www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges_frame.htm. The proposed Final Pretrial Order, original only, shall

be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on June 7, 2012. The conference is

conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be

permitted to attend.

Dated: May 1st, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02468-RPM Document 16 Filed 05/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1