alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David P. CARRIER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-4048.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 23, 2003.

Decided Aug. 18, 2003.

*262Frank R. Jones, Sasscer, Clagett & Bucher, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David P. Carrier was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol by a magistrate judge and his conviction was affirmed on appeal by the district court. On appeal to this court he raises one issue: whether the magistrate judge should have granted his motion to suppress the evidence gathered following the investigative stop of his vehicle. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Viewing the evidence as required, see *United States v. Seidman,*156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir.1998), we find that the magistrate judge, and district court on appeal, properly found that the involved officer had a reasonable suspicion that Carrier was driving under the influence of alcohol when she stopped him. *See United States v. Sharpe,*470 U.S. 675, 682, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); *United States v. Rusher,*966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir.1992) (giving review standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                                                              November 4, 1998



Mr. Kevin O'Leary
President
The Learning Company, Inc.
One Athenaeum Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Dear Kevin:

         Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated April 9, 1997
between The Learning Company, Inc. and you (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used and not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.

         This letter is to confirm the action of the Corporation's Compensation
Committee on October 22 with respect to the Agreement. Effective as of 
October 1, 1998, the Annual Base Salary in Section 2.1 has been changed to 
$750,000, and the Bonus in Section 2.4 has been changed to $1,000,000.

         Please contact me if you have any questions.

                                        Sincerely,


                                        /s/ William H. Shupert, III
                                        ---------------------------
                                        William H. Shupert, III
                                        Sr. Vice President, Human Resources
#### THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, BY ITS BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, PETITIONER, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND FRANK F. DZERK, RESPONDENTS.

Argued January 20, 1948

Decided February 13, 1948.

Before Justices Bodine, Heher and Wachenfeld.

For the petitioner, *Milton T. Lasher.*

For Frank F. Dzerk, *John J. Breen*and *Milton B. Conford.*

.For Civil Service Commission, *Walter D. Van Riper*and *Louis S. Cohen.*

*468For American Legion, Department of New Jersey, *C. Conrad Schneider.*

The opinion .of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

Subject to the approval of the court, counsel have stipulated that if a writ should be allowed the court shall consider the matter and make a final determination of the meritorious question involved.

On Ma3r 16th, 1947, Frank F. Dzerk, a disabled veteran, was certified by the Civil'Service Commission as eligible for appointment to the Bergen County Traffic Police Department.

Dr. Raphael S. G-iladyq an examining physician, submitted to the Board of Freeholders the following report: “Mr. Frank F. Dzerk is in perfect physical state. However, his reasons for disability on discharge from' the army and his history of behavior in the army suggests, that he be examined in a mental hygiene clinic where a psychiatrist’s opinion should be obtained as to his stability mentally before becoming a patrolman.”

The Civil Service Commission took the view that the Board of Freeholders was obliged to appoint Mr. Dzerk for the pro- . bationary period under *R. S.*11:27-3, as amended. *Pamph. L.*1946, *ch.*227, *p.*837, § 3, which is as follows:

> “Veterans with a record of disability incurred in line of duty, as herein defined in section 11:27-l of this title, who shall receive a passing rating in competitive examinations or tests as herein provided for entrance into the public service, shall be placed at the top of the employment list in order of their respective final ratings.”

That such duty is clear seems settled by the reasoning in *Civil Service Commission*v. *Rife,*128 *N. J. L.*503; *Morgan*v. *Civil Service*Commission, 131 *Id.*410.

If during the probationary period, the veteran displays inability for the service or the legislature changes the law no harm is done, but in the meantime the law as made by the legislature must be obeyed. It does not call for a psychiatrist’s opinion.

The action of the Civil Service Commission is affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BOBBIE LEE DANIELS,

a/k/a BOBBY LEE DANIELS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2022-4137

August 16, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michael S. 

Williams, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
J.S .F., A CHILD , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2935 LT Case No. 2017

- CJ

- 000192

- A
STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/
Decision filed January 10, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County , Richard A. Howard, J udge.
Matthew J

. Metz, P ublic D efender, a nd Darnelle P aige La wshe , A ssistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, an d Rebecc a Rock McGuigan , Assistan t Attorne y General, Daytona B each, for

A ppellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, HARRIS an d EISNAUGLE , JJ. , conc ur.
10.3 Purchase Order with Municipal Traffic Department of Shelby County,
Tennessee

October 19, M

Mr. Maury Wessels

Manager of Information Systems

General Sessions cow Clerk's Office

140 Mavis, Room 13-14


                                        1
<PAGE>

Meng* TN. 32103

Dear Mr. Wessels,

Re: IVR System

Communication Systems, Inc. and IVoice, Inc. want to assure you At the IVR
System proposed does not inherently produce a long lag time from inquiry to
answer response. ODBC connectivity does provide the technical means to provide
quick quay-answer capabilities just as a keyboard nuking a query receives a
response to the CRT.

C.S.I. and I Voice are willing to Mond Our warranty coverage in the following
manner: Should the IVR System produce unacceptable log time, ( 7 to 20
seconds.). from quay to answer from a condition created by the IVR System the
System will be corrected to an acceptable lag time or the System removed if no
fix is provided and A monies except shipping costs and installation refunded.
C.S. I. and I Voice do not warrant and are not responsible for log time which
occurs within your Network or Mainframe which shall be The responsibility of
Shelby County a well as any fix required.

We am confident that you will not encounter any lag time problems because of our
system. However, we offer this added assurance of this fact due to the proven
performance of our system and also to provide you with a mar* comfortable
feeling since there is no way to provide you with a live demonstration of your
application without building the IVR application.

Should you have any other questions do not hesitate contacting me. We took
forward to working with you on this project and hopefully many more in the
future.

Joseph R. Brown

TQ-A(- P, 02

                                        2
<PAGE>

                                                              'PURCHASE ORDER

                                                          N2            12421

      COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.                      TV4,16 Fotj*oelb hikolly
Ab"#AA 6K A6

      3V6 COMMERCIAL PARKwAy a P.o. sox I u3j)

                                                              We

               MDON& TENNESSIE mi 1 o

                                                              .   fix

                                                  ED& *r-,W AA T

    Vo I- a coy-ri Inc

                       34

         deo N'T 0-174 7

LA4(N

                                                              i     Mice

                                 IV rz) 4vdwaj-( 11
                                                 --


                                       3
<PAGE>

                             otm In c, quo-k


                                       4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01928-RBJ-BNB

VICKI DILLARD and

PATRICIA EVANS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DEPUTY GARY GREGORY, in his official and individual capacity,

SERGEANT TOM FRANK, in his official and individual capacity,

JOHN DOES, DENVER DEPUTY SHERIFFS (4), in their official and individual capacities, 

and

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,

Defendants.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND FINAL PRETRIAL/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on October 29, 2012 at 9:00 p.m. 

A Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference is set for September 6, 2012 at 2:30 p.m.

Counsel who will try the case shall attend in person.

During the Final Pretrial/Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to 

address: jury instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, 

stipulations as to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 33 Filed 02/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 1st day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01928-RBJ Document 33 Filed 02/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128861 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PETER VERVERIS and THERESA VERVERIS, Justices as Next Friend of PHILIP VERVERIS, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 128861 COA: 251868 Oakland CC: 2002-037354-NI HARTFIELD LANES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 19, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. See Kenny v Kaatz Funeral Home, Inc , 472 Mich 929 (2005).

C AVANAGH and K ELLY , JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

d1208 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 15, 2005

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-42424, 333-56318, 333-10208 and 333-139073) of
Calton, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2008 relating to the financial
statements for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007.




                                                         /s/ AIDMAN, PISER, P.A.





Tampa, Florida
February 28, 2008
217 La. 871

#### STATE v. GLYNN.

No. 39885.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1950.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Severn T. Dar-den, Dist. Atty., Matthew S. Branifif, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of New Orleans, for appellant.

G. Wray Gill, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant was charged in a bill of information with aggravated burglary of a dwelling inhabited by one William Fuller and one Mrs. Elise Fuller. His counsel moved to quash the information on the ground that it was not alleged that any person or persons were actually present in the dwelling at the time of the alleged burglary. The trial judge quashed the information and the state, after having reserved a bill of exception, has appealed.

*671Article '60 of the Criminal Code, as amended by Act 285 of 1948 defines aggravated burglary as the unauthorized en-. tering of any inhabited dwelling, or of any structure, watercraft, or movable where a person is present, etc. Under the plain provisions of this article of the Criminal Code, it is not necessary to allege that a person was present in the inhabited dwelling at the time of the alleged burglary. It is only when there is a burglary of any structure, etc., that it is necessary to'allege that a person is present. This was pointed out in the case of State v. Fazzio, 208 La. 296, 23 So.2d 99. The charge in the Fazzio case was brought under Article 60 of the Criminal Code before the 1948 amendment. Act 285 of 1948 in amending Article 60 and repealing Article 61 of the.Criminal Code merely eliminated the distinction- between burglary in the daytime and burglary in the nighttime. This amendment did not change the provision regarding the unauthorized entering of an inhabited dwelling. The Fazzio case is not only controlling but a correct interpretation of the plain provisions of the statute regarding the unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court is reversed and set aside. The information is reinstated and the case is remanded to the lower court to be proceeded with according to law.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1347

 To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as of 
  which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 
 deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 
                        activities on the land.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2007

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as of 
  which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 
 deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 
                        activities on the land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act (Public Law 106-
568; 114 Stat. 2919) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``Notwithstanding'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Acceptance of Land.--Notwithstanding'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The Secretary'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Declaration.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class II Gaming.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), 
        notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Lytton 
        Rancheria of California may conduct activities for class II 
        gaming (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) on the land taken into trust under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Requirement.--The Lytton Rancheria of California 
        shall not expand the exterior physical measurements of any 
        facility on the Lytton Rancheria in use for class II gaming 
        activities on the date of enactment of this paragraph.
    ``(d) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class III Gaming.--
Notwithstanding subsection (a), for purposes of class III gaming (as 
defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2703)), the land taken into trust under this section shall be treated, 
for purposes of section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 
U.S.C. 2719), as if the land was acquired on October 9, 2003, the date 
on which the Secretary took the land into trust.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00364-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. RAMON ACOSTA-BALLESTEROS,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure that all

pre-trial phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by Friday, October 14, 2011,

and responses to these motions shall be filed by Friday, October 28, 2011. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on all pending motions, if necessary, and

final trial preparation conference will be set at a future date upon the request of counsel. 

It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that a 3-day jury trial is set for Monday, November 21,

2011, at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002.

Dated: September 20, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 107 

To amend title VII of the Public Health Service Act to make certain graduate 

programs in professional psychology eligible to participate in various 

health professions loan programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. REID (for Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title VII of the Public Health Service Act to 

make certain graduate programs in professional psychology eligible to participate in various health professions loan programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthen the Public 

5 Health Service Act’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 107 IS

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION IN VARIOUS HEALTH PROFESSIONS 

2 LOAN PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) LOAN AGREEMENTS.—Section 721 of the Public 

4 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 292q) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, or any 

6 public or nonprofit school that offers a graduate pro7 gram in professional psychology’’ after ‘‘veterinary 

8 medicine’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting ‘‘, or to a 

10 graduate degree in professional psychology’’ after 

11 ‘‘or doctor of veterinary medicine or an equivalent 

12 degree’’; and 

13 (3) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘, or 

14 schools that offer graduate programs in professional 

15 psychology’’ after ‘‘veterinary medicine’’. 

16 (b) LOAN PROVISIONS.—Section 722 of the Public 

17 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 292r) is amended— 

18 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘, or to a 

19 graduate degree in professional psychology’’ after 

20 ‘‘or doctor of veterinary medicine or an equivalent 

21 degree’’; 

22 (2) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding 

23 paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, or at a school that of24 fers a graduate program in professional psychology’’ 

25 after ‘‘veterinary medicine’’; and 

26 (3) in subsection (k)— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 107 IS

1 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

2 by striking ‘‘or podiatry’’ and inserting ‘‘podia3 try, or professional psychology’’; and 

4 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘or 

5 podiatric medicine’’ and inserting ‘‘podiatric 

6 medicine, or professional psychology’’. 

7 SEC. 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 

8 (a) HEALTH PROFESSIONS DATA.—Section 792(a) of 

9 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295k(a)) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘clinical’’ and inserting ‘‘profes11 sional’’. 

12 (b) PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON

13 BASIS OF SEX.—Section 794 of the Public Health Service 

14 Act (42 U.S.C. 295m) is amended in the matter preceding 

15 paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘clinical’’ and inserting ‘‘profes16 sional’’. 

17 (c) DEFINITIONS.—Section 799B(1)(B) of the Public 

18 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295p(1)(B)) is amended 

19 by striking ‘‘clinical’’ each place the term appears and in20 serting ‘‘professional’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending November 28, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE                                                            * 3A3The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York.Newspaper: 12/23/2015Federal Register: Not available
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
the Report.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Stephen P.
Marsh


Stephen
P. Marsh, President & Chief Executive Officer





March 31,
2007