alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
04 

Order issued October 1 , 2012 

In The 

(Court i1 Apprats 

Nift11 Elistrirt of &txas atDallas 

No. 05-11-01189-CV 

JOHN PRIDE, INDIVIDUALLY AND PHAREALE INVESTMENTS INC., 

AS REGISTERED AGENT OF JOHN PRIDE, Appellants 

V. 

MARLISA WILLIAMS AND MORRIS WILLIAMS, Appellees 

ORDER 

We abated this appeal on May 2, 2012 to permit the trial court to dispose of pending claims 

and modify the appealed judgment so as to make it final. The trial court has modified the judgment 

and a supplemental clerk's record containing that judgment has now been filed. Accordingly, we 

REINSTATE the appeal. The appeal will be submitted in due course.
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Kenneth
I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2003
                       By:       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                       ----------------------------------------------------
                                 Kenneth I. Denos
                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         211,334                 138,398
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,705                 123,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,039                 261,483
<PP&E>                                          51,687                  47,719
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,785                  30,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,853                 286,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,649                  28,358
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           464                     464
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,853                 286,721
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,890                  28,242
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,434                  18,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,850)                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,306                   9,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,086                   4,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,220                   5,721
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,220                   5,721
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16                       0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 978 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 25, 2008. 

Whereas the School Social Work Association of America declared the week of March 3–7, 2008, ‘‘School Social 

Work Week’’; 

Whereas the House of Representatives recognized the importance of school social work through the inclusion of 

school social work programs in the current authorization 

of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 

and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act; 

Whereas school social workers serve as vital members of a 

school’s educational team, playing a central role in creating partnerships between the home, school, and community, to ensure student academic success; 

Whereas school social workers are especially skilled in providing services to students who face serious challenges to 

school success, including poverty, disability, discrimination, abuse, addiction, bullying, divorce of parents, loss of 

a loved one, and other barriers to learning; 

Whereas there is a growing need for school districts to offer 

the mental health services that school social workers provide when working with families, teachers, principals, 

community agencies, and other entities to address the 
2 

•HRES 978 EH 

emotional, physical, and environmental needs so that students may achieve behavioral and academic success; 

Whereas to achieve the goals of the No Child Left Behind 

Act of 2001 of help for all children in reaching their optimal potential and achievement, including those with serious emotional disturbances, schools must work to remove 

the emotional, behavioral, and academic barriers that 

interfere with student success in school; 

Whereas fewer than 1 in 5 of the 17,500,000 children in need 

of mental health services actually receive these services, 

and the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental 

Health indicates that school mental health programs improve educational outcomes by decreasing absences, decreasing discipline referrals, and improving academic 

achievement; 

Whereas school mental health programs are critical to early 

identification of mental health problems and in the provision of appropriate services when needed; 

Whereas the national average ratio of students to school social workers recommended by the School Social Work Association of America is 400 to 1; and 

Whereas the celebration of ‘‘School Social Work Week’’ highlights the awareness of the vital role school social workers 

play in the lives of students in the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

school social workers to the success of students in 

schools across the Nation; and 
3 

•HRES 978 EH 

(2) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe ‘‘School Social Work Week’’ with appropriate 

ceremonies and activities that promote awareness of the 

vital role of school social workers in schools, and the 

community as a whole, in helping students prepare for 

their future as productive citizens. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1





EXHIBIT 10.1

BURNT BASIN MINERAL CLAIMS

 

47 units in British Columbia, Canada known as the Burnt Basin
mineral claims:


  
  	
      Claim Name
	
      Tenure Number
	
      Units
	
      Expiry Date

	Molly Gibson	
      393541
	
      20
	
      June 30, 2004

	Motherlode	
      393542
	
      20
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #1	
      395681
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #2	
      395682
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #3	
      395683
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #4	
      395684
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #5	
      395685
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #6	
      395686
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004

	Lode #7	
      395687
	
      1
	
      June 30, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02409-CMA-MJW

THERMAPURE, INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DISASTER RESTORATION, INC., a Colorado corporation, and

RESTORATION LOGISTICS, INC., a Colorado entity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

FINAL JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION

_____________________________________________________________________

The Court has ordered that:

1) A permanent injunction shall be entered enjoining Defendants Disaster

Restoration, Inc. and Restoration Logistics, Inc. from directly infringing,

contributing to the infringement or inducing infringement of U.S. Patent

No. 6,327,812; 

2) that the action against Defendants Disaster Restoration, Inc. and

Restoration Logistics, Inc. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3) that the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement

Agreement entered into between the Parties on November 23, 2011.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 8th day of December, 2011.

FOR THE COURT:

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

s/Valeri P. Barnes 

Valeri P. Barnes,

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02409-CMA-MJW Document 19 Filed 12/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02392-WJM-MJW Document 33 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                           DIGITAL SOUND CORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON AND
                            COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                          --------------------------------------------------------
                             1992       1993        1994       1995        1996
                          ---------- ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------
<S>                       <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>
Income (loss) before
 extraordinary item
Extraordinary item......      $1,490    $(5,719)     $2,488    $(5,188)    $(6,801)
Net income (loss).......         744        --          --         --          --
                          ---------- ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------
                              $2,234    $(5,719)     $2,488    $(5,188)    $(6,801)
                          ========== ==========  ========== ==========  ==========
Applicable common and
 common stock equivalent
 shares:
  Weighted average
   shares common stock..  18,292,245 18,830,141  19,474,315 19,880,879  20,085,551
  Assumed conversion of
   convertible preferred
   stock on date of
   issuance.............         --         --      821,918        --          --
  Shares available upon
   exercise of other
   options and warrants
   outstanding based on
   an average market
   price of $3.38,
   $3.32, $2.04 and
   $1.63 for 1992, 1994,
   1995 and 1996,
   respectively, using
   the "treasury stock"
   method. Because of
   the antidilutive
   effect the "treasury
   stock" method was not
   used in 1993, 1995 or
   1996.................   1,132,769        --      495,345        --          --
                          ---------- ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------
Total...................  19,425,014 18,830,141  20,791,578 19,880,879  20,085,551
                          ========== ==========  ========== ==========  ==========
Earnings (loss) per
 common and common
 equivalent share:
  Income (loss) before..       $0.08     $(0.30)      $0.12     $(0.26)     $(0.34)
  Extraordinary item....        0.04        --          --         --          --
                          ---------- ----------  ---------- ----------  ----------
  Net income (loss).....       $0.12     $(0.30)      $0.12     $(0.26)     $(0.34)
                          ========== ==========  ========== ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D19-2358 Lower Tribunal No. 17-598MPI

________________ 

### Allen Lenoir, M.D., Appellant,

vs. 

### State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration, Appellee.

An Appeal from the State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration. Allen Lenoir, M.D., in proper person. Tracy Lee Cooper George (Tallahassee), Chief Appellate Counsel, and Nicholas A. Merlin (Tallahassee), Senior Attorney, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Worster v. Dep’t of Health, 767 So. 2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (holding: “In an appeal from an administrative proceeding, a party cannot argue on appeal matters which were not properly excepted to or challenged before the agency”); Redfern v. Dep’t of Prof. Reg., 498 So. 2d 1313, 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding nurse failed to establish that the Department abused its discretion in declining to accept exceptions to a recommended order filed after expiration of the statutory time period for filing such submissions). See also § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2021) (providing that “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact”); Graham v. Estuary Props., Inc., 399 So. 2d 1374, 1380 (Fla. 1981) (noting: “The reviewing court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the agency on a finding of fact or the weight thereof”); Lenard v. A.L.P.H.A. “A Beginning” Inc., 945 So. 2d 618, 623 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (observing that “[w]hen reviewing the findings and conclusions of a government agency, this court is not permitted to substitute its judgment for that of the agency if competent, substantial evidence supports the agency's factual findings and the agency correctly applied the applicable statutory criteria.”)
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02399-LTB Document 7 Filed 10/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

[to be published]. 

# Status:

Open meeting. 

# Place: 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting: 

Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 10 a.m. 

# Change in the Meeting: 

Cancellation of Meeting. 

The Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 1, 2008 has been cancelled. 

For further information please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8-23074 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02318-BNB

ROBERT LAWRENCE CROSS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

NICHOLAS STASI, Durango Police Dept.,

DUKE SCHIRARD, La Plata County Sheriff,

SHERIFF DEPUTIES, La Plata County Jail,

TODD RISBERG, #24763, District Attorney’s Office,

REID STEWART, #37729, District Attorney’s Office,

LA PLATA COUNTY SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,

JEFFERY WILSON, District Court Judge

LA PLATA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT,

JERRY LITTLE, Pre-Trial Services,

ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION,

HILLTOP HOUSE SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER, and

ANY AND ALL OTHER KNOWN AND UNKNOWN PARTIES IN THE MATTER OF

CAUSE NO. 10CR508,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

Plaintiff’s “Petition to Appoint Advisory Counsel” (Doc. #8) filed on October 24,

2011, is construed as a motion for appointment of counsel and is DENIED as

premature. Plaintiff’s “Petition for Court Order” (Doc. #9) filed on October 24, 2011, in

which Plaintiff requests a court order directing jail officials to allow Plaintiff to receive

legal books and writing paper from state-appointed advisory counsel, is DENIED. 

Plaintiff’s “Petition to Merge Inferior Tribunal Case No. 11CR98 Within Superior Court

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02318-BNB” (Doc. #10) filed on October 24, 2011, is DENIED.

Dated: October 25, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02318-BNB Document 12 Filed 10/25/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02391-RPM

MARVIN J. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

Defendant.

 

ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

 

Pursuant to the hearing convened today, it is

ORDERED that a pretrial conference is scheduled for June 21, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in the

Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street,

Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation and

Submission of Final Pretrial Order which may be found at

www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges_frame.htm. The proposed Final Pretrial Order, original only, shall

be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on June 13, 2013. The conference

is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or representatives of parties will be

permitted to attend.

Dated: March 27th, 2013

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02391-RPM-KMT Document 28 Filed 03/27/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K
(the  "Form  10-K")  for  the period ended June 30, 2002 of Pizza Inn, Inc. (the
"Issuer").

I,  Ronald  W. Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer certify that to
the  best  of  my  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d)); and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


            September 27, 2002                              /s/ Ronald W. Parker
                                                            --------------------
                                                                Ronald W. Parker
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO]
                                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                    1000 Morgan Keegan Tower
                                                    Fifty North Front Street
                                                    Memphis, TN 38103
                                                    Telephone (901) 522 2000
                                                    Facsimile   (901) 523 2045


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 for TBC Corporation's 1989 Stock Incentive Plan and TBC
Corporation's 2000 Stock Option Plan of our reports dated February 8, 2002,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of TBC Corporation and its subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, which reports are
included in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


March 5, 2002


                                      -216-
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ulysses Turley Jr., Appellant. American Axle & Manufacturing Inc., Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 775]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 29, 2001, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

As a result of his conviction of driving while intoxicated, claimant was incarcerated in January 2000 and unable to report to his job as a machinist until he was released in August 2000. While claimant was in jail, his employer granted him two leaves of absence, but refused to grant him extended leave beyond April 10, 2000. Consequently, claimant was terminated from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits, ruling that he was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. After granting claimant’s request for reconsideration, the Board adhered to its prior decision.

*764We affirm. This Court has held that a claimant’s unavailability for employment due to incarceration for an alcohol-related offense constitutes misconduct disqualifying the claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits *(see, Matter of Matyjczuk [Delphi Automotive Sys. Div. of Gen. Motors Corp.—C*ommissioner *of Labor],*262 AD2d 847, 848; *Matter of Opoka [Sweeney],*232 AD2d 718, 719). Inasmuch as it is undisputed that claimant was unable to report to work because of his incarceration, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Her cure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.