alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Mark H. Cosmez II, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Giga-tronics, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: 6/15/04                                       /s/  Mark H. Cosmez II   Mark H. Cosmez II   VP Finance, CFO and Secretary  
44
174 La. 859

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willard BRYANT.

No. 31794.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 1932.

Rehearing Denied May 23, 1932.

Percy Saint, Atty. Gen., J. U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport, and James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to the Atty. Gen., for the State.

OVERTON, J.

Defendant was convicted of breaking and entering in the nighttime a church building, occupied by the King’s Highway Christian Church, with the intent to steal, and was duly sentenced to the penitentiary for one year. The record presents no bill of exception, no error appears upon the face of the record, and defendant has made no appearance by brief or otherwise.

No error appearing, the verdict and the sentence are affirmed.
#### Stewart Collins et al., Appellants, v Irving Eichenbaum, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 399]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered February 2, 2001, which granted defendant landlord’s motion for summary judg*327ment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment on his counterclaim to the extent of directing plaintiff tenants to either sign the leases as offered or be subject to eviction proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There is no prohibition, under statute or the New York City Loft Board’s determination concerning the subject premises, against a lease clause waiving the right to a jury trial, and tenants are not entitled to the automatic exclusion of such a clause when negotiations on the issue with the landlord prove futile.

Tenants concede that the parties never agreed that landlord would waive the right to recover possession of any unit in the premises for his own use, and their estoppel argument was properly rejected by the IAS court, since there is no evidence that either the Loft Board or tenants relied on the owner’s purported waiver on that issue.

Although the named defendant is no longer the actual owner of the subject premises, having conveyed it in 1994 to his wife of 50 years, she stated in two affidavits that her husband acted as her authorized agent at all pertinent times, she ratified and adopted all of his actions (including negotiating the offered leases and asserting the counterclaim), and she agreed to submit to the court’s jurisdiction and be bound by its decision. Accordingly, summary judgment on the counterclaim, to compel the tenants to either sign the leases as offered or face eviction proceedings, was properly granted. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS***
We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatement 33-61977 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, RegistrationStatement 33-61979 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, RegistrationStatement 33-12571 on Form S-8 dated March 11, 1987 andRegistration Statement 33-593 on Form S-8 dated October 1, 1985,of our report dated February 25, 1999, (except for Note D, as towhich the date is March 31, 1999), with respect to theconsolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the consolidated statements of operations,stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December31, 1998 of Integral Vision, Inc. and subsidiary (formerly Medar, Inc. and subsidiaries)included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.
/S/ Ernst & Young, LLP
Detroit, Michigan
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7377

CARLTON EUGENE ANDERSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOHN A. HERRING,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00265-FDW)

Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlton Eugene Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Eugene Anderson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief 

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Anderson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending May 19, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of 24Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Arnold P. Kling, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934, as amended; and                  
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 5, 2008

|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Arnold P. Kling       
|                          
|Arnold P. Kling
 President

A signed original of this certification
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of BRIGHTON OIL & GAS,  Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period from January 27, 2005  (Inception)  through March 31, 2007
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.



                                    /s/
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Name:  Linda Contreras
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer/
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                    Dated: August 20, 2007
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Conseco, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William J. Shea,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ William J. Shea
-----------------------------
William J. Shea
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Conseco, Inc. and will be retained by Conseco, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 22 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 23 of 24
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 78-1 Filed 07/28/16 USDC Colorado Page 24 of 24
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Jacques Mot
                                              -----------------------
                                              Jacques Mot
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                              November 20, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-465-SM

Kevin Clark

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $3.60 is due no later than

February 8, 2009. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

Sing Sing Correctional Institution, Ossining, NY, when the amount

in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been

paid. Failure to pay the fee as ordered will result in dismissal

of the action without prejudice. In all other respects

plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 8, 2008

cc: Kevin Hall

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Sing Sing Correctional Institution, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00465-SM Document 7 Filed 01/08/09 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50219

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JAMES B. MITCHELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-94-CV-60

_________________________________________________________________

February 14, 1997

Before KING, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James B. Mitchell, No. 47109-080, appeals the district

court’s denial of his § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct sentence. We need not determine whether Mitchell needs a

certificate of appealability (COA) under the newly enacted

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA),

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996); 28 U.S.C. 
2

§ 2253(c)(1)(B). After reviewing the record and the arguments on

appeal, we would neither grant a COA if the amendment applies,

nor would we grant relief under the unamended version of § 2255. 

We make this determination for substantially the reasons cited by

the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, DR-89-CR-8

(Jan. 12, 1996). Mitchell’s argument that the Government

breached its plea agreement also fails under the intervening case

United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 368-69 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40493 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MIGUEL TOLEDO

- VILLANUEVA, also known as Teodoro Romero

- Torres , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 799

- 2

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Toledo

Villanueva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir . 2011). Toledo

- Villanueva has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Toledo

- Villanueva ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 30, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40493 Document: 00514815075 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2019No. 18

- 40493

2 assessment that the appeal presents no non frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40493 Document: 00514815075 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2019
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I,
Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 19, 2005



/s/ Jack W. OehlkeJack W. OehlkePresident and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Subcommittee 
Meeting on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels will 
hold a meeting on Friday, October 24, 2008, at 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland, Room T-2B3.
    The meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Friday, October 24, 2008,--8:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will receive an update on the technical basis 
supporting changes to the fuel design criteria within 10 CFR 50.46 (b). 
The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with 
representatives of the NRC. The Subcommittee will gather information, 
analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Officer, Mr. 
Christopher L. Brown (Telephone: 301-415-7111) 5 days prior to the 
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 
Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of 
the meeting that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the 
conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the 
Federal Register on September 26, 2007, (72 FR 54695).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:45 a.m. and 5:30 
p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact 
the above named individual at least two working days prior to the 
meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Cayetano Santos,
Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, ACRS.
[FR Doc. E8-23347 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P