alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Science, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Robert Melamede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ *Dr. Robert Melamede*Dr. Robert MelamedeChief Executive Officer

August 15, 2011

                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
218 La. 462

#### Dutrell E. BAKER v. J. C. CHANCE WELL SERVICE, Inc.

No. 39564.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1950.

Elton A. Darsey, Houma, for intervener-applicant.

St. Clair Adams & Son, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

MOISE, Justice.'

For the reasons assigned in the cases of Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Company et al., Baker v. Sun Oil Company et al., and Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service, Inc., 218 La. 453, 49 So.2d 852, handed down this day, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

LE BLANC, J., recused.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH 

CARL GENBERG, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STEVEN S. PORTER; an individual, 

JEFFREY SPERBER; an individual, 

AL BAUTISTA; an individual, 

MICHELLE DARNAUD; an individual, 

CHERYL HOFFMAN-BRAY; an individual, 

PHILIPPE GASTONE; an individual, and, 

MARC REDLICH, an individual, 

Defendants. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

 THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion Of Defendants Steven S. 

Porter, Jeffrey Sperber, Alberto Bautista, Michel Darnaud, Cheryl Hoffman-Bray, And 

Philippe Gastone To Consider Attachments A And B To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss 

[ECF No. 86]. After careful consideration, it is 

 ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion to Consider Attachments A and B [ECF 

No. 86] is GRANTED. 

 Dated: December 17, 2012. 

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 105 Filed 12/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.1 

 

**FOURTH AMENDMENT TO FINANCING AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendment to Financing Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 15th day of May, 2003 between KeyTronic Corporation (‘Company”) and The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. (“CIT”) in reference to that certain Financing Agreement between Company and CIT dated August 22, 2001, as amended (hereinafter “FinancingAgreement”). Capitalized terms herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning set forth in the Financing Agreement. 

 

Company and CIT desire to amend the Financing Agreement as set forth below. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 

 

1. The definition of “Borrowing Base” is hereby amended and restated to read as follows: 

 

“**Borrowing Base**shall mean the lesser of (l) eighty five percent (85%) of ****the Company’s aggregate outstandingEligible Accounts Receivable less Dilution Reserves, if any and (2) the amount of cash collections of Accounts for the prior forty five (45) Business Days, less any applicable Availability Reserves.” 

 

2. Clause (b) (iv) of the definition of **Eligible Accounts Receivable** is herebyamended and restated to read as follows: 

 

“(iv) contra Accounts(excluding Lexmark International, Cognitive, Clorox, Lexmark International Technology, S.A. and Axiohm so long as such account debtors have executed CIT’s agreement referenced in Section 2.1 (bb) herein, provided such Accounts do not exceed theMaximum Contra Exposure in the aggregate at any one time)” 

 

3. Thedefinition of “Eligible Inventory” is hereby deleted in its entirety. 

 

4. The definition of “Inventory Loan Cap” is hereby amended and restated to read as follows: 

 

“**Inventory Loan Cap** shall mean the amount of $0.00.” 

 

5. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts with the same affect as if the signatures to each counterpart were upon a single instrument. 

 

6. Except as modified by the terms herein, the Financing Agreement and the Loan Documentsremain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms without offset, counterclaim or recoupment. 

 

7. This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 

 

8. Company agrees to pay, on demand, all reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the negotiation, documentation and execution of this Amendment. If any legal action or proceeding shall becommenced at any time by any party to this Amendment in connection with its interpretation or enforcement, the prevailing party or parties in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to reimbursement of its reasonable attorneys’ fees andcosts in connection therewith. 

COMPANY AND CIT HEREBY WAIVE ALL RIGHTS EITHER MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING TO ENFORCE,DEFEND, INTERPRET OR OTHERWISE CONCERNING THIS AMENDMENT. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written. 

 

KEY TRONIC CORPORATION

By
 
/S/ Ronald F. Klawitter

Its
 
Exec. VP of Admin. & CFO

THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

By
 
Jeannette M. Behm

Its
 
Vice President, Acct. Mgr.
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**Change of Control Bonus Plan for Five SeniorExecutives**

 

At the Company’s November 8, 2005 board meeting, the Board ofDirectors voted to adopt a verbal plan approved by the Company’s CompensationCommittee to award five key executives: Gary De Mello – Chief OperatingOfficer; Jon Denis – Executive Vice President, Sales; Dennis Jolicoeur – ChiefFinancial Officer; Steven Spitz – Vice President, General Counsel; MichaelSurmeian, Vice President, Sales a one year salary bonus upon a change  in control of the Company.  Such a bonus, which would be equivalent tothe base pay of each individual at the time of the change of control event,would be triggered by any of the five (5) listed events under section 3(c) MERGERS AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS as enumerated in Natrol Inc.’s Amended andRestated 1996 Stock Option and Grant Plan filed with the SEC in May 2000as part of the Company’s Proxy Statement. The five events are as follows:

 

•                  The dissolution or liquidation of the Company.

 

•                  The sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on a consolidated basis to an unrelated person or entity.

 

•                  A merger, reorganization or consolidation in which the holders of the Company’s outstanding voting power immediately prior to such transaction do not own a majority of the outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting entity immediately upon completion of such transaction.

 

•                  The sale of all of the Stock of the Company to an unrelated person or entity. 

 

•                  Any other transaction in which the owners of the Company’s outstanding voting power prior to such transaction do not own at least a majority of the outstanding voting power of the relevant entity after the transaction (in each case, a “Transaction”).

 

The change of control bonuses are associated with the specificindividuals listed and not with the positions listed.  The current base salaries of theseindividuals are: Gary De Mello, $275,000; Jon Denis, $325,000, Dennis Jolicoeur$250,000, Steven Spitz $226,767; and, Michael Surmeian $187,000.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that:

(i) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                    
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2010 |  | /s/ Mark A. Hoppe                                  
|                       |  | Mark A. Hoppe President and
Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Dated: August 13, 2010 |  | /s/ Randall T. Conte                               
|                       |  | Randall T. Conte Chief
Financial Officer
NO. 07-06-0345-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 23, 2006

______________________________ JEFFREY D. CALVERT, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 69 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F MOORE COUNT Y; NO. 2575; HON ORABLE RON E NNS, JUDG E

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAM PBELL and HANCO CK, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Appellant, Jeffery D. Calvert, attempts t o appeal f rom the denial of a M otion for Nunc Pro Tunc. We dismiss for want of juri sdiction. Appellant

was c onvicted of Ag gravated Sexual Ass ault on October 10, 1994, and assessed court cos ts as part of sen tencin g. On November 3, 2005, the trial cour

t issued an Inmate Trust Account Order to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice ordering that the assessed cour

t costs be paid from appe llant’s inmate trust account. In May of 2006, appellant

filed a Motion for Correcti on of the Record N unc Pro Tunc conten ding that the2

trial court erre d i n de ducting the court costs from h is inmate trus t account. On July 26, 2006, the tria l court w rote a letter declining appellant’s r equest to cor rect the record. Subsequently, appellant appe aled the trial court’s denial of his mo tion for nunc pro tunc. The denial of a motion nun c pro tunc is not an appeal able order. See Allen v. State , 20 S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex.App.–Tex arka na 2000, no pet.); See also State v. Ross , 953 S.W.2d 748, 755 (Tex.C rim.App. 1997). Therefore, we mus t dismiss thi s appeal for want of jurisdicti on.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not publish
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elena Katz

v. Civil No. 08-cv-372-JD

Strafford County Dept.

of Corrections, et al

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: September 24, 2008

cc: Elena Katz

Case 1:08-cv-00372-JD Document 8 Filed 09/24/08 Page 1 of 1
JAVONNE TERRELL MURPHY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2238

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for A ppellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129061 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129061 

 COA: 261762 

Genesee CC: 03-012727-FC 

LESTER LEON RICHARDS, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on the ESBWR will hold a meeting on October 21-22, 2008, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed to protect information that is proprietary to General Electric-Hitachi (GEH) Nuclear Energy and its contractors pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4). 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

## Tuesday, October 21, 2008,—8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

## Wednesday, October 22, 2008,—8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. 

The Subcommittee will review Chapters 7 and 14 of the Safety Evaluation Report with Open Items associated with the ESBWR Design Certification Application. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, GEH, and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Dr. Harold J. Vandermolen, (Telephone: 301-415-6236) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 26, 2007, (72 FR 54695).                 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: September 23, 2008. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Branch Chief.

[FR Doc. E8-23391 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 69 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
#### State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Herzog et al., Appellants.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on February 8, 1989, unanimously affirmed, for the reasons stated by Herman Cahn, J., without costs and without disbursements. The order of this court entered on July 19, 1990 [163 AD2d 256] is hereby recalled and vacated. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Description of Incentive Compensation and Severance Arrangement
                              with Edward M. Berube

         In connection with recruiting Mr. Berube to join the Company and his
subsequent appointment as the President of Bankers Life and Casualty Company, a
subsidiary of the Company, the Company agreed to compensate him for the loss of
certain incentive compensation which would have been otherwise available from
his prior employer. Pursuant to this arrangement, Conseco has agreed that Mr.
Berube will have accumulated incentive compensation in 2004 with a value of at
least $1,234,000.

         In addition, Conseco agreed that it would provide Mr. Berube a
severance benefit of the greater of two year's salary and bonus or $2,320,000 in
the event of a change of control or major change in strategy resulting in the
elimination of his role or material reduction in his responsibilities (but not a
termination of employment due to cause or lack of performance).
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00466-CR

Lester Ray Guy, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-302548, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s attorney has filed a fifth motion for extension of time to file a brief.

We grant the motion, extending the deadline to October 14, 2013, but caution counsel that any

further motions for extension of time will result in the abatement of this appeal for a hearing

pursuant to rule 38.8(b).

It is ordered October 9, 2013.

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Do Not Publish
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- KiewitPhelps Under Contract No. W9128F-12-C-0023 APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) 

### ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60850

Vivian Katsantonis, Esq. Richard G. Mann, Jr., Esq. John F. Finnegan III, Esq.

Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P. McLean, VA Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Thomas J. Ingram, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 23 May 2018
~M Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60850, Appeal ofKiewitPhelps, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00067

- CR

Fred Lee Morgan

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1341383D )

March 26, 2015

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT CO URT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert J. Keogh, state and attest that:



I am the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. (the Issuer).



I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Issuer for the period ended December 31, 2003, (the Report) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer for the periods
presented.



Date: March 24, 2004



/s/ Robert J. KeoghRobert J. KeoghPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1352

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1352 ES

1 SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 127 East Locust Street in 

5 Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate May 23, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1352

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Fairbury, Illinois, as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend al Service located at 127 East Locust Street in