alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2099

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

Management Act of 1996 to provide adequatefunding authorization for the Vancouver NationalHistoric Reserve.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2099

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National Historic Reserve.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2099 EH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE.

2 Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks

3 and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C.

4 461 note; 110 Stat. 4154) is amended by striking

5 ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and all that follows through the period and

6 inserting ‘‘$15,000,000 for development costs associated

7 with capital projects consistent with the cooperative man8 agement plan, except that the Federal share of such devel9 opment costs shall not exceed 50 percent of the total

10 costs.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
214 La. 374

#### STATE v. THOMAS.

No. 38996.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1948.

C. A. Byrne, of New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Herve Raci-vitch, Dist. Atty., and Girard J. Fernandez, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of New Orleans, for appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of simple burglary and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the Penitentiary. He has appealed from the conviction and sentence.

The defendant was charged in a bill of information with, having “committed simple burglary of the building and structure No. 2425 Louisiana Avenue belonging to the Flint Goodrich Hospital of Dillard University, etc.”

When the case was called for trial and after the first witness had testified in part, the trial court permitted the State to amend the bill of information to read, “committed simple burglary of the building and structure being the nurses’ home of the Flint Goodrich Hospital of Dillard University at 2425 Louisiana Avenue, etc.” Counsel for the defendant objected to the amendment of the bill of information and moved the trial court to discharge the jury and continue the trial. The objection was overruled and a bill of exception reserved. Counsel for the defendant reurges the objection to the amendment of the bill of information and the forcing of the defendant to trial in a motion for a new trial.

Counsel takes the position that the amendment was made to the substance of the bill of information and that it was the mandatory duty of the trial court to grant a continuance under the provisions of Article 253 of the Criminal Code of Procedure. He contends that the accused was not informed of the nature and cause of the accusation set forth in the amended bill of information before trial in violation of Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution of this State. The contention is based on the ground that the nurses’ home of the hospital is a separate and distinct building from the - main building of the hospital located at 2425 Louisiana Avenue.

The evidence taken in connection with the bill of exception shows that the nurses’ home is located behind the main hospital building on the same plot of ground and separated from it by a walk. The original bill of information charged the defendant with the burglary of the building and structure No. 2425 Louisiana Avenue belonging to the hospital. The amendment to the bill of information merely sets forth with more particularity the building burglarized.

Describing the building more particularly does not change the substance of the bill of information. Under the provisions of Articles 253 and 364 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a defendant is not entitled to a discharge of the jury and a continuance unless a review of the entire proceedings disclosed that the defendant had been mislead or prejudiced in his defense. The defendant could not in' this case have been mislead or prejudiced by an amendment more fully describing the building burglarized.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 28, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134739 Michael F. Cavanagh 

134978 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SHEPHERD MONTESSORI CENTER MILAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 134739 

 COA: 272357 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001072-AS 

ANN ARBOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

ANN ARBOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING 

OFFICIAL and ANN ARBOR CHARTER 

TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

SHEPHERD MONTESSORI CENTER MILAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134978 

 COA: 272357 

Washtenaw CC: 00-001072-AS 

ANN ARBOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

ANN ARBOR CHARTER TOWNSHIP ZONING 

OFFICIAL and ANN ARBOR CHARTER 

TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 

judgment and the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2007 order of the Court 

of Appeals are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we VACATE the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals and we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Greater Bible 

Way Temple of Jackson v City of Jackson, 478 Mich 373 (2007). In particular, the Court 

of Appeals should reconsider whether the denial of the zoning variance imposed a 

“substantial burden” on the plaintiff’s religious exercise, i.e., whether the denial of the 

variance “coerce[s] individuals into acting contrary to their religious beliefs.” Id. at 401. 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

 

2 

“A mere inconvenience or irritation” or “something that simply makes it more difficult in 

some respect to practice one’s religion does not constitute a ‘substantial burden.’” Id. In 

addition, we REVERSE the August 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals awarding 

plaintiff sanctions for a vexatious motion for reconsideration. Given the facts and the law 

at issue in this case, the Court of Appeals clearly erred in imposing such sanctions. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows: 

I would not remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of 

Greater Bible Way Temple of Jackson v City of Jackson,

1

 for the reasons stated in my 

concurrence in that case. Rather, I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the 

denial of a variance implicates the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.2 

If it does, we should determine whether it imposes a substantial burden on plaintiff’s 

exercise of its religious beliefs. 

1

 478 Mich 373 (2007). 

2

 42 USC 2000cc et seq. 

p0325 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 28, 2008 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   330
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,104
<OTHER-SE>                                       (774)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (190)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1277 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1277

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
treatment of payment under the Medicare program for clinical laboratory 
             tests furnished by critical access hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2007

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
treatment of payment under the Medicare program for clinical laboratory 
             tests furnished by critical access hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Access to Clinical Lab 
Services Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY TESTS 
              FURNISHED BY CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(g)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m(g)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``no beneficiary cost-
        sharing for'' and inserting ``treatment of''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For 
        purposes of the preceding sentence and section 1861(mm)(3), 
        clinical diagnostic laboratory services furnished by a critical 
        access hospital shall be treated as being furnished as part of 
        outpatient critical access services without regard to whether--
                    ``(A) the individual with respect to whom such 
                services are furnished is physically present in the 
                critical access hospital at the time the specimen is 
                collected;
                    ``(B) such individual is registered as an 
                outpatient on the records of, and receives such 
                services directly from, the critical access hospital; 
                or
                    ``(C) payment is (or, but for this subsection, 
                would be) available for such services under the fee 
                schedule established under section 1833(h).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending March 6, 2021

----

Monetary and Financial Policy            Lending Facilities -- extension of the termination date to June 30, 2021, for the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility; and report to Congress pursuant to section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act.            -Approved, March 4, 2021            Personnel            Office of Inspector General -- appointment of Stephen Carroll as associate inspector general.            -Announced, March 1, 2021            Reserve Bank Operations            Federal Reserve Bank of New York -- appointment of Naureen Hassan as first vice president.            -Approved, March 2, 2021            Enforcement            Allegiant United Holdings, LLC, Irvine, California; Nano Financial Holdings, Inc.; and Nano Banc -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.            -Announced, March 4, 2021                        Gateway Bank, Rison, Arkansas -- consent order of prohibition against Jessica Shirey, a former institution-affiliated party.            -Announced, March 2, 2021                        SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia -- consent order of prohibition against Jeremy Boles, a former institution-affiliated party.            -Announced, March 2, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00370-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL PETURA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES AND DEADLINES

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge

Philip A. Brimmer in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A701, 7th Floor, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on November 14, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. It is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by October 21, 2011 and

responses to these motions shall be filed by October 28, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall

be made no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any

challenges to such experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is

further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made

one week after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such

experts shall be made no later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is

further

Case 1:11-cr-00370-PAB Document 13 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is set for November 10, 2011 at

3:00 p.m. in Courtroom A701. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in

person. 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial

Preparation Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED September 27, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00370-PAB Document 13 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit-21

SUBSIDIARIES

The Company has one subsidiary, First Citizens
National Bank, Dyersburg, Tennessee. The Company is the sole shareholder of the
Bank. First Citizens National Bank is a National Bank organized under the
authority of the Comptroller of the Currency.

On January 28, 1985, First Citizens Financial
Plus, Inc. was chartered in the State of Tennessee as a wholly-owned subsidiary
of First Citizens National Bank for the purpose of providing investment advisory
service to the community. The Corporation's registration with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an investment advisor was effective February 21, 1985.

On December 19, 1988 First Citizens Financial
Plus, Inc. received notification from the National Association of Securities
Dealers that the Company's registration as a broker/dealer was effective. As a
result, in addition to being an investment advisor, the Company is now a full
service introducing broker/dealer.

On August 19, 1996, Delta Finance, Inc. was
chartered in the State of Tennessee as a wholly-owned subsidiary of First
Citizens National Bank for the purpose of providing consumer financial services
to the community. Delta Finance will operate as an Industrial Loan and Thrift
Company pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 45-5-101 and to acquire by
purchase, lease or otherwise, and to hold, operate, manage, develop, encumber
and otherwise deal with any and all kinds of real and personal property and to
engage in any business not prohibited by law under the laws of Tennessee; and to
do any and all things necessary or incidental in the operation of such business
or businesses. A branch office was opened September 21, 1998 in Milan,
Tennessee. A third location was opened in Union City in November 2000 through
acquisition of an existing consumer finance office.

On February 9, 1998, White and
Associates/First Citizens Insurance, LLC was chartered in the State of Tennessee
as a Limited Liability Company of Dyersburg Insurance Agency and First Citizens
Insurance Interim Inc. for the purpose of providing general insurance services
to the community. During 1999, a credit insurance division and a title insurance
company were formed under the White and Associates/First Citizens umbrella.
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01757-LTB Document 11 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         655,716
<SECURITIES>                                 1,266,935
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,234,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   211,482
<INVENTORY>                                  4,268,949
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,638,815
<PP&E>                                      10,522,457
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,283,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,982,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,627,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,835
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,603,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,982,709
<SALES>                                     18,410,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,410,255
<CGS>                                        9,150,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,150,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,211,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,982,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,618,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,600,094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,600,094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.91)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Annual Report of ZAP (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven M. Schneider, as Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Steven M. Schneider
              Steven
                M. SchneiderTitle:  Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
                November 13, 2007








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.