alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Edy Francis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





APRIL 30, 2010





/s/ EDY FRANCIS


EDY FRANCIS


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 10.25


        MOBIUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 1998 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                                 AMENDMENT NO.2

                  Pursuant to Section 15 of the Mobius Management Systems, Inc.
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"), and as approved by the Board of
Directors of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the "Company") and in accordance
with the resolutions of the stockholders of the Company adopted on February 6,
2001, Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

         4.1 The total number of shares of common stock of the Company, par
         value $.01 per share ("Common Stock"), which may be transferred
         pursuant to the Plan shall be 1,150,000 shares. Such shares may be
         authorized but unissued Common Stock or authorized and issued Common
         Stock held in the Company's treasury or acquired by the Company for the
         purpose of the Plan. Shares subject to any lapsed or expired option
         shall again become available for transfer pursuant to options granted
         or to be granted under the Plan.
#### Adele ANGAL, Appellant, v. FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION, Inc., a Florida nonprofit corporation, and Marion Wilbur Castle as Administrator of the Estate of M. W. Castle, Deceased, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

Feb. 9, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
1 “[#24]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02388-REB-KLM

MEGHAN STONE,

Plaintiff,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss [#24]1 filed June

27, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should

be granted and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss [#24] filed June 27, 2012, is

GRANTED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for October 12, 2012, is VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence October 29, 2012, is VACATED; and

Case 1:11-cv-02388-REB-KLM Document 25 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay

their own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated June 27, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02388-REB-KLM Document 25 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.36


March 12, 2004



Mr. Edward J. Simoneau
Vice President & General Manager - Dealer Financial Services
44 Old Ridgebury Road
Danbury, CT  06810-5105

Re:  International Operating Agreement dated April 15, 1998 as amended from time
     to time (the "Operating Agreement")

Dear Ed:

NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. ("NMHG") and General Electric Capital
Corporation ("GE Capital") and all of their respective affiliates and
subsidiaries which may be parties to the above-described Operating Agreement,
hereby agree that the "Base Term" (as that term is described in the Agreement)
shall be extended and shall now expire on December 15, 2004 ("New Base
Expiration Date") and all of the duties and obligations of the parties to the
Operating Agreement (as amended) shall continue unmodified and in full force and
effect until such date. Accordingly, in conjunction with the extension of such
"Base Term", the obligations of NMHG arising under (i) the Recourse for
Wholesale Accounts set forth in Section 3.7 of the Operating Agreement and (ii)
the terms of the Guaranty (as amended) shall continue unmodified and in full
force and effect through the New Base Expiration Date.

By their respective signatures below, NMHG and GE Capital each hereby agree to
all of the extensions noted above.


NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.



         /s/ Jeffrey C. Mattern
-----------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey C. Mattern
Treasurer


GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION



         /s/ Edward J. Simoneau
-----------------------------------------------------
Edward J. Simoneau
Vice President & General Manager - Dealer Financial Services
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1396 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1396

 To authorize a major medical facility project to modernize inpatient 
wards at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Atlanta, 
                                Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2007

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a major medical facility project to modernize inpatient 
wards at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Atlanta, 
                                Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY PROJECT, ATLANTA, 
              GEORGIA.

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may carry out a major medical 
facility project for modernization of inpatient wards at the Department 
of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, in an amount not 
to exceed $20,534,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2


                         MOBIUS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3



            Pursuant to Section 10 of the Mobius Management Systems, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors' 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), and in accordance
with the resolutions of the Board of Directors of Mobius Management Systems,
Inc. adopted on February 7, 2006, the first sentence of Section 6(c) of the Plan
is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


            Each option granted under the Plan shall first be exercisable with
            respect to 25% of the shares subject thereto on each of the dates
            three months, six months, nine months and twelve months after the
            date of grant.






                                       1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00792

- CR

John Wayne POLLY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 375971

The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s motion to publish opinion of the court is hereby granted.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hot tle

Clerk of Court
# **EXHIBIT 21**

#  

# **ARCTIC CAT INC.**

#  

Subsidiaries of the Company

 

Arctic Cat Sales Inc.

organized under the laws of

the State of Minnesota

100% of common stock owned by parent

 

Arctic Cat Production LLC

organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota

100% of the membership units owned by parent

 

Arctic Cat Production Support LLC

organizedunder the laws of

theState of Minnesota

100%of the membership units owned by parent

 

Arctic Cat Shared Services LLC

organized under the laws of

the State of Minnesota

100%of the membership units owned by parent

 

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1385 

To designate the United States courthouse facility located at 301 North 

Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse facility located 

at 301 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the 

‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. C. CLYDE ATKINS UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 facility located at 301 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Flor7 ida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘C. Clyde At8 kins United States Courthouse’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 1385 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the United States courthouse facility referred to 

4 in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

5 ‘‘C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 9, 2005



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL
ZUGAY                                           
|Michael Zugay Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Earl FUNDERBURG v. STATE.

7 Div. 126.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge,

Affirmed. •
Case 1:11-cv-01937-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01937-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01937-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01937-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01937-LTB Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Foldera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Reid Dabney, Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 14, 2007/s/
                  Reid DabneyReid Dabney
                  Senior
                    Vice President and Chief Financial
                    Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1149 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry Products Inspection Act to authorize the interstate distribution of State-inspected meat 

and poultry if the Secretary of Agriculture determines that the State 

inspection requirements are at least equal to Federal inspection requirements and to require the Secretary to reimburse State agencies for 

part of the costs of the inspections. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, and Mr. CONRAD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act and the Poultry 

Products Inspection Act to authorize the interstate distribution of State-inspected meat and poultry if the Secretary of Agriculture determines that the State inspection requirements are at least equal to Federal inspection 

requirements and to require the Secretary to reimburse 

State agencies for part of the costs of the inspections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1149 IS

1 SECTION 1. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE IN2 SPECTED MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS. 

3 (a) MEAT PRODUCTS.—Section 301(a)(1) of the Fed4 eral Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 661(a)(1)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) The Secretary’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘(1)(A) The Secretary’’; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by 

9 paragraph (1)), by striking ‘‘solely for distribution 

10 within such State’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall reimburse a State 

13 agency administering inspections pursuant to sub14 paragraph (A) for not less than 50 percent and not 

15 more than 60 percent of the costs of administering 

16 the inspections.’’. 

17 (b) POULTRY PRODUCTS.—Section 5(a)(1) of the 

18 Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 454(a)(1)) is 

19 amended— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) The Secretary’’ and insert21 ing ‘‘(1)(A) The Secretary’’; 

22 (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by 

23 paragraph (1)), by striking ‘‘solely for distribution 

24 within such State’’; and 

25 (3) by adding at the end the following: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 1149 IS

1 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall reimburse a State 

2 agency administering inspections pursuant to sub3 paragraph (A) for not less than 50 percent and not 

4 more than 60 percent of the costs of administering 

5 the inspections.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
INTRAWARE, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,436
<SECURITIES>                                    12,148
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                      8,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,802
<PP&E>                                           5,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,503)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,729
<SALES>                                         35,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,616
<CGS>                                           27,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (9,785)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,395)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
#### HORTON v. LOUISVILLE & N. R. R. CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### Peretz Z. Skolnik, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Respondents, and Farhad Kohan, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d *455200]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Farhad Kohan appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), entered April 10, 2001, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Farhad Kohan, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff was injured when he fell over a raised portion of the sidewalk which abutted properties owned by the defendant Farhad Kohan and the defendants Jacov Weiss and Hedwig Weiss. It is well settled that the owner of land abutting a public sidewalk owes no duty to keep the sidewalk in a safe condition *(see Hausser v Giunta,*88 NY2d 449; *Reinoso v City of New York,*288 AD2d 455; *Ritts v Teslenko,*276 AD2d 768). Nevertheless, the adjoining landowner may be held liable where he or she creates a hazardous condition on the sidewalk *(see Lattanzi v Richmond Bagels,*291 AD2d 434; *Gaynor v City of New York,*259 AD2d 733).

The Supreme Court concluded that there was an issue of fact as to whether Kohan created a hazardous condition when he allegedly patched the sidewalk with asphalt after the City of New York removed a tree. Kohan denies that he made any repair to the sidewalk. However, even assuming that Kohan made such a repair, this was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, nor did it contribute to the happening of the accident. Accordingly, Kohan was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against him *(see Winberry v City of New York,*257 AD2d 618; *Nguyen v Brentwood School Dist.,*239 AD2d 406). Santucci, J.P., Altman, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  Schedule   contains   summary   financial  data  extracted  from  the
     consolidated  financial statements of Amscan Holdings,  Inc. as of June 30,
     2000 and for the six months then ended and is  qualified in its entirety by
     reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001024729
<NAME>                        Amscan Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,753)
<INVENTORY>                                     65,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,115
<PP&E>                                         109,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (47,904)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,135
<BONDS>                                        263,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,669)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,814
<SALES>                                        156,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,135
<CGS>                                           97,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,737
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,157
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02364-REB-MEH

KANDACE OLSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NE COLORADO CELLULAR, INC.,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 22, 2011.

The Joint Motion for Entry of Protective Order [filed November 21, 2011; docket #8] is

granted. The proposed Protective Order is accepted, issued and filed contemporaneously with this

minute order.

Case 1:11-cv-02364-REB-MEH Document 10 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1