alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB

ALVIN MOSCH,

PATRICIA C. MOSCH, and

DAVID K. MOSCH, each individually and d/b/a MOSCH MINING COMPANY,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN HENRY, a/k/a JOHN T. HENRY a/k/a JOHN L. HENRY,

UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, and any one claiming by or through any

of the named persons,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

 This matter arises on identical papers filed by defendant John Henry titled Proposed

Quiet Title Suit John Henry vs Mosch Mining Co [Docs. ##141 and 142] (the “Papers”). Any

relief sought by the Papers is DENIED.

Defendant John Henry is proceeding pro se, and I must liberally construe his pleadings. 

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). I cannot act as advocate for a pro se litigant,

however, who must comply with the fundamental requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). 

It appears that Mr. Henry is attempting to file a claim against the plaintiffs to quiet title to

certain properties. The proposed complaint is largely illegible. However, it is clear that the

complaint is drafted for filing in the District Court of Clear Creek County, Colorado. In

addition, the complaint is stamped “DRAFT” and is unsigned. The signature block is prepared

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 145 Filed 11/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

for execution by an attorney named Sean Doyle, but Mr. Doyle has not entered his appearance in

this case. 

Mr. Henry may not assert a claim against the plaintiffs in this manner. 

IT IS ORDERED that any relief sought by the papers is DENIED.

Dated November 6, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 145 Filed 11/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02451-PAB-MJW

TONYA DUNLAP,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SPEC PRO, INC.,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Vacate and Reset Settlement

Conference, DN 9, filed with the Court on February 10, 2012, is GRANTED. The

Settlement Conference set on February 23, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., is VACATED. The

parties may file a joint or unopposed motion to reset the settlement conference in this

matter at an appropriate time.

Date: February 10, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02451-PAB-MJW Document 11 Filed 02/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending August 1, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST WEST TEXAS BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                       CICNotice by David Lynn Davis, the Estate of James Lee Davis, both of Midland, Texas, and Sandra Davis Maddox, Dallas, Texas, to each retain control of First West Texas Bancshares, Inc., Midland, Texas; Retroactive notice by Nancy Chandler Davis, the Estate of Michael Keith Davis, both of Midland, Texas, the Estate of James Lee Davis, and Sandra Davis Maddox, to join the group acting in concert previously approved on August 2, 2000, under Section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act, and for this newly reconfigured group acting in concert to retain control of First West Texas Bancshares, Inc.  First West Texas Bancshares, Inc. controls West Texas National Bank, Midland, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableRIVERBEND FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                         CICBarkat Ali, Southlake, Texas, Kevin Johnston, Pantego, Texas, Mike Farhat, Southlake, Texas, Judy Han, Houston, Texas, Wea Lee, Houston, Texas, Young Yoo, Dallas, Texas, Jeung-Ho Park, Irving, Texas, Clinton Dunn, Dallas, Texas, Andrew Park, Santa Clarita, California, and Mihir Patel, Coppell, Texas, as a group acting in concert, to control Riverbend Financial Corporation, and Spectra Bank, both of Fort Worth, Texas Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 08/13/2020
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Radyne ComStream Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Radyne ComStream
Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23159) filed as of March 12, 1997, Form S-8 (File No. 333-67469)
filed as of November 18, 1998 and amended as of May 5, 1999, Form S-8 (File No. 333-90383) filed as
of November 5, 1999, Form S-8 (File No. 333-41704) filed as of July 19, 2000, and Form S-8 (File
No. 333-89316) filed as of May 29, 2002, of our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Radyne ComStream Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive
income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Radyne ComStream Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Phoenix, Arizona
March 11, 2005
FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
              ----------------------------------------------------


  This shall constitute the First Amendment, made on March 24, 2000, to that
Supplemental Retirement Agreement (the "Agreement") made on September 21, 1999
between Loews Corporation (the "Company") and Arthur Rebell (the "Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

  WHEREAS, the Executive is currently serving as an executive employee of the
Company, and the Company and the Executive desire that the Executive's
retirement benefits be supplemented on the terms and conditions set forth
herein.

  NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

  Paragraph 1(b) of the Agreement shall be amended by adding a sentence at the
end thereof which shall read as follows:  "The Account shall be credited with
a subsequent balance in the amount of $277,000 on December 31, 1999."

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above written.


                                                LOEWS CORPORATION




                                                By:  /s/ James S. Tisch
                                                   ----------------------




Accepted and Agreed to:



/s/ Arthur L. Rebell
----------------------------
The Executive
**EXHIBIT 99.01**

Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ SUNIL WADHWANI                                                                                   |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
| **Sunil Wadhwani****Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors,****Chief Executive Officer, andDirector** |   |   |   |

 

May 15, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

25
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

OMAR CYRILLE REAVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-97-153-A)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Omar Cyrille Reavis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although Reavis characterized the motion as seeking reconsideration of the court’s denial of a prior § 2255 motion, the

latter motion raised new, unrelated claims and was properly construed by the district court as a successive § 2255 motion.

2

PER CURIAM:

Omar Cyrille Reavis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001).* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Reavis, No. CR-97-153-A (E.D.

Va. filed July 30, 2001; entered Aug. 1, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants




The Board of Directors
First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-85749) on Form S-8 of First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated
January 23, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of First Manitowoc
Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, which appears in the December
31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of First Manitowoc Bancorp, Inc.




Wipfli LLP

Green Bay, Wisconsin
March 12, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00370-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL PETURA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 24, 2011 [Docket No. 15]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 10, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 10, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 25, 2011.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department



## 677 **KA 10-01857**
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEAN PIERRE VILLAFANE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ASHLEY R. SMALL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered July 6, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), we conclude that the valid waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the sentence because Supreme Court failed to advise defendant of the potential periods of incarceration or the potential maximum term of incarceration ( see People v Newman , 21 AD3d 1343; People v McLean , 302 AD2d 934; cf. People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737), and there was no specific sentence promise at the time of the waiver ( cf. People v Semple, 23 AD3d 1058, 1059, lv denied 6 NY3d 852). Nevertheless, on the merits, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 15, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
(August 28, 1990)

#### In the Matter of James A. Moss, Petitioner, v John V. Vaughn et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit further prosecution of the petitioner under Suffolk County indictment No. 818/89 on the ground that a trial is barred pursuant to CPL 40.20 by reason of a previous prosecution, and would violate the double jeopardy provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions.

*959Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Dismissal of the indictment on statutory, as well as constitutional, double jeopardy grounds (see, CPL 40.20; NY Const, art I, § 6; US Const 5th, 14th Amends) is not warranted here since at the time it accepted a plea of guilty with respect to the misdemeanor information, the District Court of Suffolk County had been divested of jurisdiction over the matter by the indictment of the petitioner on felony narcotics charges (see, *People v Carter,*134 Misc 2d 878, *affd*155 AD2d 608; CPL 170.20 [1]). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rubin and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.2

                 CONSENT OF SYSTEMES GEOSTAT INTERNATIONAL INC.

Montreal, May 19, 2004

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION                ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION
450 Fifth St. N. W.                               Suite 1903, Box 55
Washington, DC 20259                              20 Queen Street West
USA                                               Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8

SUBJECT: Our reports dated February 23, 2004
         MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES

We hereby consent to the inclusion of references to our reports dated February
23, 2004, regarding the mineral reserves and resources of the Joe Mann Mine,
which appear under Item 4 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Campbell
Resources Inc. (the "Corporation") for the year ended December 31st, 2003.

SYSTEMES GEOSTAT INTERNATIONAL INC.

(s) Robert de l'Etoile
------------------------------------
Robert de l'Etoile, eng.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Kirk M. Warshaw,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)       The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.

s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
----------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: May 11, 2007

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Edy Francis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





MARCH
20,
2009
  /s/
EDY
FRANCIS
 EDY
FRANCIS
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 (PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)








A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ISRAMCO,
INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>1
 DATA STATED IN THOUSANDS


             VOLUNTARY SCHEDULE - CERTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION



REGULATION         STATEMENT CAPTION                   1996    1995    1994   

5-02 (1)            Cash and Cash Items               12506    11694    9784   
5-02 (2)            Marketable Securities             75747    73892   64168  
5-02 (3)(b)(1)      Notes Receivable                 211389   191906  168781 
5-02 (4)            Allowance for Doubtful Accounts    2282     2216    2054 
5-02 (15)           Total Assets                     313069   291412  256685 

5-02 (24)           Other Liabilities                283466   264309  232806 
5-02 (30)           Common Stock                        732      731     715 
5-02 (31)(a)(2)     Additional Capital Other          10097     9720    9000 
5-02 (31)(a)(3)(ii) Retained Earnings-Unappropriated  18774    16651   14164 
5-03 (b)(1)(e)      Other Revenues                    28150    25213   21318 
5-03 (b)(2)(e)      Cost of Other Revenues            10498     9992*   9213 
5-03 (b)(8)         Interest and Amortization of
                    Debt Discount                     11959    11181    7971 
5-03 (b)(10)        Income Before Taxes & Other Items  5693     4039*   4134 
5-03 (b)(11)        Income Tax Expense (Benefit)       1984     1333    1188 
5-03 (b)(14)        Income/Loss from Continuing 
                    Operations                         3709     2706*   2946 
5-03 (b)(17)        Cumulative Change in Accounting 
                     Principle                            0        0       0
5-03 (b)(19)        Net Income or Loss                 3709     2706    2946 
*Reclassification of overdraft income.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02313-MSK-MEH

LARRY L. WRIGHT,

Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondent.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455(a), a Magistrate Judge shall disqualify himself under the

following circumstance:

Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall

disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might

reasonably be questioned.

In my former employment with the U.S. Department of Justice, I developed and maintain a close

relationship with Mark Pestal, defense counsel in this case. Although I do not have an actual bias

or prejudice in this matter, my impartiality might be reasonably questioned. Consequently, in an

effort to serve the ends of justice and to avoid any appearance of impropriety, I hereby recuse myself

from service in this matter. I direct the Clerk of the Court to cause this matter to be reassigned by

random draw to another Magistrate Judge.

Case 1:11-cv-02313-MSK-MJW Document 19 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 30th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02313-MSK-MJW Document 19 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,360
<PP&E>                                         227,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,463
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     193,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,958
<SALES>                                         34,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (97)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>