alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
179 La. 710

#### STATE v. WHITEHEAD MOTOR CO., Inc.

No. 32751.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1934.

*913Breazeale & Saehse, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

G. L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., and Leslie A. Fitch, of Baton Rouge, for the State.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment in favor of the tax collector for certain license taxes on business done by the defendant in the years 1931, 1932, and 1933. The tax collector has moved to dismiss the appeal because the amount of the taxes in contest does not exceed $2,000. In fact the amount is much less than $2,000. Hence, if the question of appellate jurisdiction depended upon the amount in contest, the case would be transferable to the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit. But the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in this case, regardless of the amount in contest, because, according to the fifth paragraph of the tenth section of article 7 of the Constitution, this court has appellate jurisdiction “in all cases wherein the constitutionality or legality of any tax * * * levied by the State * * * is contested.” A part of the claim of the tax collector in this case is not contested; but, as far as the claim is contested, the legality of the taxes is the question in contest. The defendant contends that, if any taxes are due for the year 1931 or for the year 1932, the license tax for each year should be calculated not upon the business done in the previous year, as contended by the tax collector, but upon the business done in the year for which the tax is claimed; but the defendant contends primarily that Act No. 205 of 1924, under authority of which the tax collector is claiming the license taxes for 1931 and 1932, was repealed by Aet No. 190 of 1932, and hence that the tax collector has no right of action for license taxes for those years. Both of the defendant’s pleas were decided in favor of the tax collector.

It is well settled that this court has appellate jurisdiction over questions of legality, as well as over questions of constitutionality, of any tax claimed by a tax collector as having been levied by the state, or by a municipality, or parish, or other taxing subdivision of the state. And the question of legality of a tax is in contest when a judicial interpretation of the tax statute invoked is necessary to determine whether the tax claimed is due, or when the defendant pleads that there is no statute compelling payment of the tax claimed. State v. Rosenstream, Weiss *&*Co., 52 La. Ann. 2126, 28 So. 294; State v. Orfila, 116 La. 972, 41 So. 227; State v. Wenar, 118 La. 141, 42 So. 726; Downs, Tax Collector, v. Dunn, 162 La. 747, 111 So. 82; State v. Cedar Grove Refining Co., 178 La. 810, 152 So. 531.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

ST. PAUL, J., absent.
#### Derrick Graham, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 102124.)

[744 NYS2d 918]

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Collins, J.), entered April 2, 2001, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Court of Claims, Collins, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorsld, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------




CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002,
William Hartman , Chief Financial Officer of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that :

(3)  such Form Type of ZAP for the nine months ended September 30, 2002,fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
     Securities Exchange of 1934; and

(4)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months
     ended September 30, 2002,fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.





/s/  William Hartman
------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


November 12, 2002
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1139 

To establish the National Landscape Conservation System, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2007 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. SALAZAR, Ms. CANTWELL, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To establish the National Landscape Conservation System, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Landscape 

5 Conservation System Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 1139 IS

1 (2) SYSTEM.—The term ‘‘system’’ means the 

2 National Landscape Conservation System estab3 lished by section 3(a). 

4 SEC. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE 

5 CONSERVATION SYSTEM. 

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—In order to conserve, protect, 

7 and restore nationally significant landscapes that have 

8 outstanding cultural, ecological, and scientific values for 

9 the benefit of current and future generations, there is es10 tablished in the Bureau of Land Management the Na11 tional Landscape Conservation System. 

12 (b) COMPONENTS.—The system shall include each of 

13 the following areas administered by the Bureau of Land 

14 Management: 

15 (1) Each area that is designated as— 

16 (A) a national monument; 

17 (B) a national conservation area; 

18 (C) an outstanding natural area; 

19 (D) a wilderness study area; 

20 (E) a component of the National Trails 

21 System; 

22 (F) a component of the National Wild and 

23 Scenic Rivers System; or 

24 (G) a component of the National Wilder25 ness Preservation System. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 1139 IS

1 (2) Any area designated by Congress to be ad2 ministered for conservation purposes, including— 

3 (A) the Steens Mountain Cooperative Man4 agement and Protection Area, as designated 

5 under section 101(a) of the Steens Mountain 

6 Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 

7 2000 (16 U.S.C. 460nnn–11(a)); 

8 (B) the Headwaters Forest Reserve; and 

9 (C) any additional area designated by Con10 gress for inclusion in the system. 

11 (c) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary shall manage the 

12 system— 

13 (1) in accordance with any applicable law (in14 cluding regulations) relating to any component of 

15 the system included under subsection (b); and 

16 (2) in a manner that protects the values for 

17 which the components of the system were des18 ignated. 

19 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

20 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

21 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION FOR THE TRANSITION 
PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,491
<INVENTORY>                                     89,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,088
<PP&E>                                          96,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                (44,672)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 476,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,123
<BONDS>                                        524,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                           969
<OTHER-SE>                                   (312,410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   476,177
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,774
<CGS>                                           77,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,911
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (30,193)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (67,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (67,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report, of Zi Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Michael D. Donnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
        

        (2) The information contained in this Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.

      
    
  

	Date: May 14, 2004.	
     

	 	"Michael D.
    Donnell" 
	 	
    Michael D. Donnell

    Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02392-WJM-MJW

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff,

v.

AMEE LYN SECHRIST,

Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., and all unknown persons who claim any interest in the subject

of this action,

Third-Party Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss

filed February 20, 2013 (ECF No. 54). The Court having reviewed the Motion and being

fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Third-Party Defendant,

Citimortgage is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay its or her

own attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02392-WJM-MJW Document 55 Filed 02/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF RELEASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court following a Motion Hearing held October 14, 2011,

wherein the Court granted Defendant John Phillip Gallegos’ Unopposed Motion to Modify

Conditions of Release (#37). In accordance with the Court’s ruling, 

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Gallegos’ United States Passport, previously surrendered to and in the

custody of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, shall

be released to Mr. Gallegos or his counsel;

2. Mr. Gallegos is permitted to travel to Alaska and Hawaii, and to

destinations served by Alaska Airlines in Canada and Mexico for the purpose of work

assignments by Alaska Airlines, only; and,

3. Mr. Gallegos shall report to his supervising probation officer all

international flight assignments when such assignments are made, his itinerary, any

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 43 filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
changes to his itinerary that occur while on assignment, and to notify his probation

officer immediately upon his return to the United States.

DATED this 17th day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 43 filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending July 13, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST FINANCIAL BANK                                                                                                    * BranchFirst Financial Bank, Cincinnati, Ohio intends to establish a branch office at 900 East McMillan Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio.Newspaper: 07/27/2019Federal Register: Not applicableNEW HAZARD BANCORP, INC                                                                                                 * 3A1Application by New Hazard Bancorp, Lexington, KY to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% percent of Hazard Bancorp, Hazard, KY and thereby indirectly acquire Peoples Bank & Trust Company, Hazard, KYNewspaper: 08/31/2019Federal Register: 08/02/2019S&T BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 3A3Application by S&T Bancorp, Inc., Indiana, Pennsylvania, requesting approval to acquire by merger DNB Financial Corporation and DNB First, National Association, both of Downingtown, Pennsylvania, pursuant to Sections 3(a)(3) and (a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act.Newspaper: 08/09/2019Federal Register: 08/09/2019
#### Peter Ferraro, Appellant, v Richard Poggi, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 436]

In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated July 11, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted the cross motion of the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s affidavit in support of his cross motion and the plaintiff’s concessions establish that there was probable cause for the prosecution of the plaintiff for harassment in the second degree *(see People v Bartkow,*96 NY2d 770, 772; *People v Fellows,*239 AD2d 181). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing this action to recover damages for malicious prosecution *(see Colon v City of New York,*60 NY2d 78, 82; *Plataniotis v TWE-Advance/Newhouse Partnership,*270 AD2d 627, 628). Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23











INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(File Nos.  33-61949, 33-52786, 33-36609 and 33-23837) of the A.G. Edwards,
Inc. 1988 Incentive Stock Plan on Form S-8 of our report dated April 23,
1998, appearing in and/or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of A.G. Edwards, Inc. for the year ended February 28, 1998.







/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
May 27, 1998
St. Louis, Missouri
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01950-RBJ-CBS

TERESA GARCIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERIFF J. GRAYSON ROBINSON, in his official and personal capacities;

VINCE LINE, in his personal capacity; and

MARK CAMPBELL, in his personal capacity

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS J. 

GRAYSON ROBINSON, VINCE LINE AND MARK CAMPBELL

This matter comes before the Court upon the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss 

Defendants J. Grayson Robinson, Vince Line and Mark Campbell, in their individual capacities

with prejudice from this action (Doc. # 99), and the Court finding good cause therefore,

The parties’ motion is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims and 

complaint against Defendants Robinson, Line and Campbell, in their individual capacities be and 

are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear his/its own costs and fees, and that the 

case caption shall henceforth be amended to reflect the dismissal of said parties.

DATED this 5

th day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01950-RBJ-CBS Document 100 Filed 11/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





May 11, 2007                                 /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                             Vice President and Chief Financial
                                               Officer
Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 342 Filed 04/03/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
                                                                            99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of ThE Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/S/ RICHARD E. GATHRIGHT
-------------------------------------------------
Richard E. Gathright
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2003


/S/ MICHAEL S. SHORE
-------------------------------------------------
Michael S. Shore
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1309 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1309

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2007

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit universal defaults on 
             credit card accounts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Universal Default Prohibition Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBIT UNIVERSAL DEFAULTS ON CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS.

    Section 127 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1637) is 
amending by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Universal Defaults Prohibited.--
            ``(1) In general.--No creditor may use any adverse 
        information concerning any consumer, including any information 
        in any consumer report (as defined in section 603) or any 
        change in the credit score of the consumer, as the basis for 
        increasing any annual percentage rate of interest applicable to 
        a credit card account of the consumer under an open end 
        consumer credit plan, or to remove or increase any introductory 
        annual percentage rate of interest applicable to such account, 
        for reasons other than actions or omissions of the consumer 
        that are directly related to such account.
            ``(2) Notice to consumer.--The limitation under paragraph 
        (1) on the use of adverse information by a credit card issuer 
        shall be clearly and conspicuously described to the consumer by 
        the credit card issuer in any disclosure or statement required 
        under subsection (a) or (b).''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-60367

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT PATTERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:96-CV-180-B

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Patterson, federal prisoner #09268-042, argues that

the district court erred in denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

in which he alleged that there was not a sufficient factual basis

to support his guilty plea conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). 

His motions to supplement the record and for an expedited appeal

are DENIED.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and AFFIRM the denial of the motion substantially for the reasons 
No. 97-60367

-2-

stated by the district court. See United States v. Patterson, 

No. 3:96-CV-180-B (N.D. Miss. April 22, 1997).

MOTIONS DENIED; AFFIRMED.