alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.2

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

INTRAWARE, INC.

(Pursuant to Section 242 of the

General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

Peter H. Jackson and Paul D. Warenski each hereby certifies:

1. They are, respectively, (a) the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and (b) Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary of Intraware, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware (the "General Corporation Law");
2. The second sentence of Article 4 of the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is to be
amended in its entirety to read a follows:
3. This Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted and declared
advisable by the Board of Directors of this Corporation in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law.
4. The Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly approved, in accordance
with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law, by vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote
thereon.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, on this 13th day of 2006.



| |                                                                                                                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Peter H. Jackson
               
                           Peter H. Jackson
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President



| |                                                                                                                                      
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Paul D. Warenski
               
                           Paul D. Warenski
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00371-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. MARTIN JOHNSON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#13) on November 7, 2011, by Defendant. The Court construes this Notice as a motion to

change his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for January 23, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. in the United

States District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A.

Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

DATED this 9th day of November, 2011.

Case 1:11-cr-00371-MSK Document 15 Filed 11/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00371-MSK Document 15 Filed 11/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1130 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1130

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore, increase, and 
  make permanent the exclusion from gross income for amounts received 
              under qualified group legal services plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2007

  Mr. Smith (for himself, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. Snowe, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
  Schumer, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kerry, and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore, increase, and 
  make permanent the exclusion from gross income for amounts received 
              under qualified group legal services plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Legal Services Benefit Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL 
              SERVICES PLANS RESTORED, INCREASED, AND MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) Increase of Exclusion.--Subsection (a) of section 120 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts received under 
qualified group legal services plans) is amended by striking the last 
sentence.
    (b) Restoration and Permanence of Exclusion.--Section 120 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts received under 
qualified group legal services plans) is amended by striking subsection 
(e) and by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending January 10, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITY STATE BANCORPORATION, INC.                                                                                         * 3A1City State Bancorporation, Inc., Central City, Iowa, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 51.3 percent of MSB Corporation, Central City, Iowa, and thereby indirectly control City State Bank, Central City, Iowa.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 02/02/2009TYGRIS COMMERCIAL FINANCE GROUP, INC.                                                                                   4c8
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard P. Johnson, the CFO of Radyne ComStream Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Radyne ComStream
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of Radyne ComStream Inc.

Dated:
March 31, 2003



| | /s/ Richard P. Johnson
Richard P. JohnsonChief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                       |                                              |                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Name      of Subsidiary                    | Other      Names UnderWhich      it Does Business | State      or OtherJurisdiction      of Incorporation |
| STAAR      Surgical AG                     | None                                              | Switzerland                                           |
|  STAAR      Japan Inc.                | STAAR      Japan Kabushiki Kaisha                 | Japan                                                 |
| Domilens      GmbH(1)                      | None                                              | Germany                                               |
|  ConceptVision      Australia Pty Ltd | None                                              | Australia                                             |

| (1) | On      March 2, 2010, the Company sold all of its interests in Domilens GmbH and      it ceased to be a subsidiary of theCompany. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 19, 2021

---





## Enforcement

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
November 8, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.,

in Courtroom A-502, 

Fifth Floor, 

Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 

901 19th Street,

Denver, Colorado 80294

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02421-REB-MJW

ALEMAYEHU GETACHEW,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

7-ELEVEN, INC., and

GOOGLE,

Defendant(s).

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE 

FOR 

PRO SE PLAINTIFF(S)

The above-captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J.

Watanabe pursuant to the Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge,

entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on October 6, 2011.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Status Conference shall be held on:

Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any

appearance in this court will be entertained unless a written request is made FIVE

(5) business days in advance of the date of appearance.

THE PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL NOTIFY ALL PARTIES WHO HAVE NOT ENTERED

AN APPEARANCE OF THE DATE AND TIME FOR THE STATUS CONFERENCE.

FURTHER, it is ORDERED that plaintiff(s) shall forthwith serve each defendant

with service of process consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

Case 1:11-cv-02421-REB-MJW Document 12 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
FURTHER, it is ORDERED that at the Status Conference the pro se Plaintiff(s)

shall:

1. Provide written proof of service of process on ALL defendants or show cause

why this case should not be dismissed for lack of service of process and/or failure to

prosecute;

2. Inform this court on whether you intend to retain legal counsel. If you intend

to retain legal counsel, then you shall be prepared to inform this court, on the record, of

what efforts you have made to retain legal counsel; and, 

3. Become familiar with the following Rules: (a) the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, (b) the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of

Practice, and (c) the Federal Rules of Evidence. These sets of rules shall apply in this

case.

Please remember that everyone seeking entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United

States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See

D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in denial of

entry into the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse.

Done and signed this October 21, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael J. Watanabe

MICHAEL J. WATANABE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02421-REB-MJW Document 12 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Cleo JOHNSON v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Amspec Services LLC, 12154 B River Road, St. Rose, LA 70087, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 6, 2005. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E8-2318 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
##### 



Exhibit
 11
 Milacron Inc. and Subsidiaries  Computation of Per-Share Earnings
 (In thousands, except per-share amounts)
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Loss from continuing operations
    
    $
    (39,785
    )
    
    $
    (16,516
    )
    
    $
    (51,304
    )Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    
    
    81
    
    
    
    2,549
    
    
    
    (479
    )Net loss
    
    
    (39,704
    )
    
    
    (13,967
    )
    
    
    (51,783
    )Less preferred dividends
    
    
    (6,240
    )
    
    
    (6,180
    )
    
    
    (3,150
    )Less beneficial conversion feature related to Series B
Preferred Stock
    
    
    (3,117
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (15,931
    )Net loss available to common shareholders
    
    $
    (49,061
    )
    
    $
    (20,147
    )
    
    $
    (70,864
    )Basic loss per share:Weighted-average common shares outstanding
    
    
    48,329
    
    
    
    47,665
    
    
    
    40,955Per share amount:Continuing operations
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
    
    $
    (.47
    )
    
    $
    (1.72
    )Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .05
    
    
    
    (.01
    )Net loss
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
    
    $
    (.42
    )
    
    $
    (1.73
    )Diluted loss per share:Weighted-average common shares outstanding (a)
    
    
    48,329
    
    
    
    47,665
    
    
    
    40,955Per share amount:Continuing operations
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
    
    $
    (.47
    )
    
    $
    (1.72
    )Discontinued operations
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .05
    
    
    
    (.01
    )Net loss
    
    $
    (1.02
    )
    
    $
    (.42
    )
    
    $
    (1.73
    )
 
 (a)
    
    In all years, the common shares into which the Series B Preferred Stock is
convertible are excluded because their inclusion would result in a smaller loss per
common share. In all years, potentially dilutive restricted shares are also excluded
for similar reasons.
#### P. L. WATSON, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 28, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02315-RPM

 

MICHAEL VAN DE WEGHE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL CHAMBERS, District Attorney, 18th Judicial District, in her official capacity;

JAY WILLIFORD, Deputy District Attorney, 18th Judicial District, in his personal capacity;

DETECTIVE GREGORY HOWDEN, Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, in his personal

capacity; and

DEPUTY JASON WALTER, Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, in his personal capacity,

Defendants.

JUDGMENT

____________________________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the Order for Dismissal, signed by Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch on

February 22, 2013, it is

ORDERED that Defendant Howden’s and Defendant Walter’s Motion to Dismiss [4] is granted

and the claims against them are dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Carol Chambers’ motion to dismiss [14] is granted and

the claims against her are dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jay Williford’s motion to dismiss [19] is granted and the

claims against him are dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Detective Gregory

Howden, Deputy Jason Walter, Carol Chambers and Jay Williford, and against plaintiff Michael Van De

Weghe, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Howden, Walter, Chambers and Williford shall have

their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this court within 14 days of entry of judgment,

and it is

Case 1:11-cv-02315-RPM Document 40 Filed 02/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint, Amended Complaint and this civil action are

dismissed.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, February 22nd, 2013

FOR THE COURT:

Jeffrey P. Colwell, Clerk

s/J. Chris Smith

By: ________________________

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02315-RPM Document 40 Filed 02/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-355-MSK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART,

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO UN-RESTRICT DOCUMENTS 308 AND 311

______________________________________________________________________

The United States of America, by and through United States Attorney John F. 

Walsh and Assistant United States Attorneys Linda Kaufman and Martha Paluch, 

respectfully hereby moves to un-restrict Documents 308 and 311 (Briefs in Support of 

Motion to Restrict) in the above matter. As grounds therefor, the government states as 

follows:

On August 30, 2013, this Court granted the government’s oral motion to unrestrict Document No. 309 (Government’s Motion for Revocation of Release, Issuance 

of Arrest Warrant, and Order of Detention) and Document No. 312 (Supplement to 

Government’s Motion for Revocation of Release, Issuance of Arrest Warrant, and Order 

of Detention) as to Defendant Waunita Weingart. 

Documents 308 and 311 were filed as Briefs in Support of the Motions to Restrict 

the now un-restricted Docs. 309 and 312, per Order of the Court. Therefore, there is no 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 332 filed 09/10/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
2

longer a need for these documents to remain restricted from public access.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the government requests the Court 

grant this motion and un-restrict Documents 308 and 311.

Respectfully submitted this 10th day of September, 2013.

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

By: s/ Linda Kaufman 

Linda Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100 

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

By: s/ Martha A. Paluch 

Martha A. Paluch, Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Martha.Paluch@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Government

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 332 filed 09/10/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 10th day of September, 2013, I electronically filed the 

foregoing GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO UN-RESTRICT DOCUMENTS 308 AND 311

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such 

filing to the following e-mail addresses:

Martin Adam Stuart

E-mail: martinstuartlaw@solucian.com

William Lewis Taylor

E-mail: wltaylorpc@gmail.com

Darlene Ann Bagley

E-mail: bagley@ridleylaw.com

Paula M. Ray

E-mail: paulamray@earthlnk.net

 By: s/ Solange Reigel 

SOLANGE REIGEL

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney's Office

1225 - 17th Street, Suite 700

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0244

Fax: (303) 454-0402

E-mail: Solange.Reigel@usdoj.gov

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 332 filed 09/10/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3