alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1495 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the application 

of the tonnage tax on vessels operating in the dual United States domestic and foreign trades, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the application of the tonnage tax on vessels operating 

in the dual United States domestic and foreign trades, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1495 IS

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE 

2 TONNAGE TAX ON VESSELS OPERATING IN 

3 THE DUAL UNITED STATES DOMESTIC AND 

4 FOREIGN TRADES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (f) of section 1355 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions 

7 and special rules) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(f) EFFECT OF OPERATING A QUALIFYING VESSEL

9 IN THE DUAL UNITED STATES DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN

10 TRADES.—For purposes of this subchapter— 

11 ‘‘(1) an electing corporation shall be treated as 

12 continuing to use a qualifying vessel in the United 

13 States foreign trade during any period of use in the 

14 United States domestic trade, and 

15 ‘‘(2) gross income from such United States do16 mestic trade shall not be excluded under section 

17 1357(a), but shall not be taken into account for pur18 poses of section 1353(b)(1)(B) or for purposes of 

19 section 1356 in connection with the application of 

20 section 1357 or 1358.’’. 

21 (b) REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR ALLOCATION OF

22 CREDITS, INCOME, AND DEDUCTIONS.—Section 1358 of 

23 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to allocation 

24 of credits, income, and deductions) is amended— 

25 (1) by striking ‘‘in accordance with this sub26 section’’ in subsection (c) and inserting ‘‘to the exVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:04 May 29, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1495.IS S1495

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•S 1495 IS

1 tent provided in such regulations as may be pre2 scribed by the Secretary’’, and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(d) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall prescribe 

6 regulations consistent with the provisions of this sub7 chapter for the purpose of allocating gross income, deduc8 tions, and credits between or among qualifying shipping 

9 activities and other activities of a taxpayer.’’. 

10 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) Section 1355(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue 

12 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘exclusively’’. 

13 (2) Section 1355(b)(1)(B) of such Code is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘as a qualifying vessel’’ and in15 serting ‘‘in the transportation of goods or pas16 sengers’’. 

17 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Date: November 2, 2012 

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 

 Parties Attorney(s) 

KATHRYN KIPLING Daniel J. Caplis 

Bradley A. Levin 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Franklin D. Patterson 

 Defendant(s) 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

MOTIONS HEARING

Court in Session: 10:08 a.m. 

Appearance of counsel. 

Argument presented on [26] Motion for Summary Judgment. 

ORDERED: Matter is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT, written order to issue. 

Court in Recess: 11:05 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:57 

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 53 Filed 11/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21

EXHIBIT 21  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name

State of IncorporationMainSource Bank


IndianaMainSource Insurance, LLC


IndianaMSB Investments of Nevada, Inc.


NevadaMSB Holdings of Nevada, Inc.


NevadaMSB of Nevada, LLC


NevadaMainSource Statutory Trust I


ConnecticutMainSource Statutory Trust II


ConnecticutMainSource Statutory Trust III


DelawareMainSource Statutory Trust IV


DelawareMainSource Capital Statutory Trust I


DelawareMSB Realty, Inc.


MarylandMainSource Title, LLC


IndianaInsurance Services Marketing, LLC


IndianaHarrodsburg Statutory Trust I


ConnecticutIndependence Bancorp Statutory Trust 1


Connecticut


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,087
<SECURITIES>                                       250
<RECEIVABLES>                                      236
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (3)
<INVENTORY>                                        375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,001
<PP&E>                                             548
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,088
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,369)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,078
<SALES>                                          1,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,888
<CGS>                                            1,420
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (314)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
Order entered October 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01125-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.P.S. AND X.Z.S., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-30153-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter LaTresta Ginyard’s September 26, 2019 request for a

thirty-day extension of time to file the record. She explains the extension is necessary because

appellant has requested twenty dates of proceedings be included in the record, and the different 

reporters involved need to be located. Because this is an accelerated appeal in a parental 

termination case, we GRANT the request to the extent we ORDER the record be filed no later 

than October 14, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(b)(2), 35.3(c).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/s/ Mitchell Gross
----------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6163

DAVID R. REDMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; WILLIE WELDON; SHERRY

LOPEZ; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; ANGELA P. RUIZ;

OFFICER GROVIER; GLENDA HINMAN; JEAN RANDALL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-488-4-17AK)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David R. Redmond, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW

& JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Redmond v. Montgomery, No.

CA-96-488-4-17AK (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02492-MSK-CBS

MARIA A. ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 17th day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02492-PAB-KMT Document 12 Filed 11/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.6


       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE EXCESS BENEFITS AGREEMENT

     This Amendment made this ____ day of _____ 2000 by and
between _______________________ ("Employee") and THE TIMKEN
COMPANY ("Timken"), an Ohio corporation having it principal
offices at Canton, Ohio.

     WHEREAS, Employee has been employed by Timken since
____ and is currently serving as
__________________________________________________ in a
capable and efficient manner; and

     WHEREAS, Timken is amending the 1984 Retirement Plan
for Salaried Employees to change the way in which earnings
are calculated for participants, as of March 31, 2000; and

     WHEREAS, Employee and Timken had entered into an
Employee Excess Benefits Agreement on _____________.

     NOW, therefore, the parties amend the employee Excess
Benefits Agreement as follows:

          ____ If Employee is an elected officer of Timken
     and retires at age 62 (or at Timken's discretion
     retires earlier or later than age 62 but not later than
     age 65), he shall be entitled to have his benefits
     hereunder calculated under the 1.75% formula in the
     Retirement Plans, unreduced for benefit commencement on
     or after age 62.  For purposes of calculating his
     benefit under the 1.75% formula, Employee's average
     yearly earnings shall mean his average yearly total
     earnings received from Timken for the four twelve-month
     periods, whether or not consecutive, during which he
     was a participant which give the highest average during
     the 10-year period immediately preceding his retirement
     date.

     Except as it is hereby amended, the Employee Excess
Benefits Agreement executed _____________ shall remain in
full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement in duplicate this ____ day of ______, 2000.


                                ________________________________
                                ("Employee")


                                THE TIMKEN COMPANY


                                By:
                                _____________________________
                                Stephen A. Perry, Senior Vice
                                President--Human Resources,
                                Purchasing & Communications
**Exhibit32.1**

 

ISONICS CORPORATION

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350Principal Executive Officer**

To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended October 31, 2006, containing financial statements for the periodthen ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.
| December 15, 2006                       |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/ James E. Alexander                  |   |
| James E. Alexander, Chief Executive     |
| Officer and Principal Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Woodward, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                          /s/ Roger Woodward
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Roger Woodward
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 17, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB

THE WELLINGER FAMILY TRUST 1998;

JULIE WELLINGER, trustee, and

JULIE WELLINGER, individually,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut insurance

company,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint to Include Claims for Alternative

Theories and Exemplary Damages [Doc. # 14, filed 4/4/2012] (the “Motion to Amend”); and

(2) The Stipulated Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [Doc. # 21, filed

4/20/2012] (the “Motion for Extension”).

 I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are

incorporated here.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion to Amend [Doc. # 14] is GRANTED; 

(2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Amended Complaint and

Jury Demand [Doc. # 14-1]; and

Case 1:11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB Document 23 Filed 04/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

(3) The Motion for Extension [Doc. # 21] is GRANTED, and the case schedule is

modified to the following extent:

Discovery Cut-Off: August 30, 2012

(All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All

written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or

before the discovery cut-off.)

Dispositive Motions Deadline: September 28, 2012

 

Expert Disclosures: The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts

and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before May 30, 2012 

Final Pretrial Conference: The final pretrial conference set for

August 14, 2012, at 8:30 a.m., is VACATED and RESET to

October 30, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred

A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,

Colorado. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties

and submitted to the court no later than October 23, 2012.

Dated April 23, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02568-CMA-BNB Document 23 Filed 04/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1344 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 

Wenatchee, Washington, as the Elwood ‘‘Bud’’ Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Wenatchee, Washington, as the Elwood ‘‘Bud’’ 

Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ELWOOD ‘‘BUD’’ LINK DE4 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUT5 PATIENT CLINIC. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs outpatient clinic located in Wenatchee, Washington, 

8 shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1344 IS

1 and designated as the ‘‘Elwood ‘Bud’ Link Department 

2 of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

6 shall be considered to be a reference to the Elwood ‘‘Bud’’ 

7 Link Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ZAP POWER SYSTEMS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
     31, 1999,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,963,900
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    402,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      654,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,199,300
<PP&E>                                           417,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (219,500)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,501,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            946,500
<BONDS>                                            8,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       6,008,100
<OTHER-SE>                                    (3,478,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,501,600
<SALES>                                        1,164,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,165,100
<CGS>                                            756,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    465,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (35,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                (131,600)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                74,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (131,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (131,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:11-cv-02541-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02541-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02541-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02541-LTB Document 4 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   Isomedix Inc., a Delaware corporation, has the following
wholly-owned subsidiaries:

          1.       Isomedix Corporation (a corporation of the Province of 
                   Ontario)

          2.       Isomedix (Puerto Rico), Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

          3.       Isomedix Management Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

          4.       Isomedix Investments, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

          5.       Isomedix Operations Inc. (a Delaware corporation)

          6.       Skyland Scientific Services, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)