alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02441-REB-BNB

ISADORE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICERS GARCIA,

ROMAN YEPSHIN,

SERGEY GUREVICH,

DETECTIVE JOEY SMITH, and

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, jointly and severally,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

 ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Defendants’ Motion to Compel Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a) [Doc. # 37,

filed 6/18/2012] (the “Motion to Compel”); and

(2) Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel [Doc. # 34,

filed 6/18/2012] (the “Motion to Withdraw”).

I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are

incorporated here. Following the filing of the Motion to Compel, the plaintiff provided

discovery responses. The only issue remaining in connection with the Motion to Compel is the

defendants’ request for attorneys fees.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 37] is DENIED as moot insofar as it seeks to

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 41 Filed 06/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

compel responses to the discovery requests and DENIED insofar as it seeks an award of costs,

such an award being unjust under the facts of this case;

(2) The Motion to Withdraw [Doc. # 34] is GRANTED. Douglas L. Romero,

Timothy D. Edstrom, and the Law Offices of Douglas Romero are relieved of any continuing

responsibility in this case. The plaintiff is cautioned that he personally is responsible for

complying with all court orders and time limitations established by any applicable rules, and his

failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions, including

dismissal of the case; and

(3) The case schedule is modified to the following extent:

• Discovery Cut-Off: September 14, 2012

• Dispositive Motion Deadline: October 12, 2012

• Final Pretrial Conference: The final pretrial conference set for October 18, 2012,

at 9:00 a.m., is VACATED and RESET to November 1, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401,

4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. A Final

Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than October

25, 2012.

Dated June 28, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 41 Filed 06/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                           THE LEARNING COMPANY, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES




Compton's Learning Company (Delaware)
Compton's NewMedia, Inc. (California)
Future Vision Holding, Inc. (New York)
Minnesota Educational Computing Corporation (MECC) (Minnesota)
SoftKey Holdings SARL (France)
Edusoft (France)(1)
SoftKey Holdings Corporation (Ontario)
SoftKey Software Products Inc. (Ontario)
SoftKey Holding GmbH (Germany)
TLC Tewi Verlag GmbH (Germany)
The Learning Company (Ireland) Limited (Ireland)
TLC Multimedia Inc. (Minnesota)
TLC Properties Inc. (Massachusetts)
The Learning Company Holland B.V. (Netherlands)
The Learning Company, K.K. (Japan)
The Learning Company (UK) Limited (England)

--------

(1) 20.19% directly held by SoftKey Holdings SARL, 47.10% indirectly held by
    SoftKey Holdings SARL, and 32.71% directly held by SoftKey Holding GmbH
#### David Pike et al., Copartners Doing Business as David Pike Assocs., Appellants, *v.*Walter Roell et al., Defendants, and Harry Berman, Doing Business as Dale Realty Co., Respondent. David Pike et al., Copartners, Doing Business as David Pike Assocs., Appellants, *v.*Walter Roell et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

January 10, 1957.

*25
      *David Friedman*for appellants.

*Alexander Berman*for Harry Berman, doing business as Dale Realty Co., respondent.

*Louis J. Castellano*for Walter Roell and another, respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment and order dismissing plaintiffs’ amended complaint as to defendant Berman should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to plaintiffs as against that defendant, and motion denied. Appeal from order granting motion of defendants Walter and Matilda Roell to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them, dismissed, without costs. No judgment was entered on that order which itself is not appealable. (Nassau County District Court Act, § 190; L. 1939, ch. 274, as amd.) The amended complaint alleges a sufficient cause of action against defendant Berman.

Pette, Hart and Di Giovanna, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
#### Almond BRADLEY, alias Amond Bradly, v. STATE.

8 Div. 189.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

Newton Powell, of Decatur, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

RICE, Judge.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
      <PAGE>1

                              Subsidiaries



The Company has two subsidiaries, First Citizens National Bank, Dyersburg,
Tennessee and the Bank of Troy, Troy, Tennessee.  The Company is the sole 
shareholder of both Banks.  First Citizens National Bank is a National Bank 
organized under the authority of the Comptroller of the Currency, while Bank
of Troy is a state chartered bank.

On January 28, 1985, First Citizens Financial Plus, Inc. was chartered
in the State of Tennessee as a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Citizens
National Bank for the purpose of providing investment advisory service
to the community.  The Corporation's registration with the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an investment advisor was effective February
21, 1985.

On December 19, 1988 First Citizens Financial Plus, Inc. received
notification from the National Association of Securities Dealers that
the Company's registration as a broker/dealer was effective.  As a
result, in addition to being an investment advisor, the Company is now a
full service introducing broker/dealer.

On August 19, 1996, Delta Finance, Inc. was chartered in the State of
Tennessee as a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Citizens National Bank
for the purpose of providing consumer financial services to the
community.  Delta Finance will operate as an Industrial Loan and Thrift
Company pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 45-5-101 and to
acquire by purchase, lease or otherwise, and to hold, operate, manage,
develop, encumber and otherwise deal with any and all kinds of real and
personal property and to engage in any business not prohibited by law
under the laws of Tennessee; and to do any and all things necessary or
incidental in the operation of such business or businesses.  A branch 
office was opened September 21, 1998 in Milan, Tennessee.

On February 9, 1998, White and Associates/First Citizens Insurance, LLC
was chartered in the State of Tennessee as a Limited Liability Company
of Dyersburg Insurance Agency and First Citizens Insurance Interim Inc.
for the purpose of providing general insurance services to the
community.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal Action No. 11-PO-00137-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CATHERINE ROST,

Defendant.

 

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

This criminal action has proceeded to sentencing and a final judgment and conviction,

and the defendant was sentenced to pay a fine and fees. As a result, all the conditions of an

appearance bond imposed by the Court as a pretrial matter to secure the Defendant’s release,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), have been satisfied. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the bond in this case is hereby exonerated and the

surety or sureties, if applicable, are released.

DATED: September 27, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-po-00137-DW Document 12 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58631-58632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23636]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of a Change in Status of an Extended Benefit (EB) Period 
for North Carolina

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility 
under the EB Program for North Carolina.
    The following change has occurred since the publication of the last 
notice regarding the State's EB status:
    <bullet> Based on data reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics 
on September 19, 2008, North Carolina's 3-month

[[Page 58632]]

seasonally adjusted total unemployment rate rose to the 6.5 percent 
threshold and exceeded 110 percent of the corresponding rate in the 
prior year. This causes North Carolina to be triggered ``on'' to an EB 
period beginning October 5, 2008.

Information for Claimants

    The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms 
and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-
State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and 
the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department 
of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State 
Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement 
to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and 
is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).
    Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to 
inquire about their rights under the program, should contact their 
State Workforce Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of 
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Workforce 
Security, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-
4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is 
not a toll-free number) or by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cdaaa4afafa2a3bee3beaea2b9b98da9a2a1e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9c929999949588d58898948f8fbb9f9497d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 29th day of September, 2008.
Brent R. Orrell,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment and Training.
 [FR Doc. E8-23636 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Phaneesh Murthy, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/S/    PHANEESH MURTHY                              
|Phaneesh Murthy Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: August 1, 2008
#### Ingber Realty Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Bernard Weintraub, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 28, 1952.

*Max J. Goldblatt*for appellant.

No one appearing for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The fixation of the rental in this case by the court below was unauthorized. Where administrative procedures are afforded, no resort may be had to a court until the complete exhaustion of such administrative procedures *(Suppus*v. *Bradley,*278 App. Div. 337).

The final order so far as appealed from should be reversed, without costs, without prejudice to further proceeding by tenant before the rent commission.

Hammer, Hoestadter and Eder, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          (3978)<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    95402
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9298
<INVENTORY>                                     124720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                231725
<PP&E>                                           69228
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  333790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           125909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2117
<OTHER-SE>                                      136314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    333790
<SALES>                                         646135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                646135
<CGS>                                           543214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   543214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 68422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5948
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27809
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16894
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16894
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
<FN>
<F1>THIS ITEM IS SHOWN NET OF "OUTSTANDING CHECKS, NET" ON THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS.
<F2>AMOUNT IS "BASIC" EPS AS COMPUTED PER FASB STATEMENT NO.128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND II DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          22,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,242,238
<PP&E>                                      14,428,604
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,222,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,229,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          574,648
<BONDS>                                      6,098,994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,556,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,229,858
<SALES>                                      1,778,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,128,491
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,392,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               632,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             464,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (199,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (548,350)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                348,706
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (199,644)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.30)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            15,314
<SECURITIES>                                       5,805
<RECEIVABLES>                                        381
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  19,609
<PP&E>                                             6,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    30,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4,467
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              27
<OTHER-SE>                                        26,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      30,764
<SALES>                                            3,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   6,137
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      2,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   2,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    3,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                         221
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                2,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                       2,845
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.08



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02316-LTB-BNB

BETSY SIBILA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MATHESON TRI-GAS, INC.,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal

With Prejudice (Doc 14 - filed January 25, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the

premises, it is therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to

pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: January 27, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02316-LTB-BNB Document 15 Filed 01/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02420-RPM

NORMAN RIDDLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY,

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

____________________________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of the complaint, the motion to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), filed by

the defendant October 26, 2011, plaintiff’s brief and response and the defendant’s reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is denied.

DATED: December 23rd , 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02420-RPM Document 14 Filed 12/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1188

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to enhance 
the ability to produce fruits and vegetables on covered commodity base 
                                 acres.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2007

  Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Bayh, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. 
Levin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
        to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to enhance 
the ability to produce fruits and vegetables on covered commodity base 
                                 acres.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farming Flexibility Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. PRODUCTION OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR PROCESSING ON COVERED 
              COMMODITY BASE ACRES.

    Section 1101 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 
(7 U.S.C. 7911) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Production of Fruits or Vegetables for Processing.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the 
        producers on a farm, with the consent of the owner of and any 
        other producers on the farm, may reduce the base acres for a 
        covered commodity for the farm if the reduced acres are used 
        for the planting and production of fruits or vegetables for 
        processing.
            ``(2) Reversion to base acres for covered commodity.--Any 
        reduced acres of a farm devoted to the planting and production 
        of fruits or vegetables during a crop year under paragraph (1) 
        shall be included in base acres for the covered commodity for 
        the subsequent crop year, unless the producers on the farm make 
        the election described in paragraph (1) for the subsequent crop 
        year.
            ``(3) Recalculation of base acres.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), if 
                the Secretary recalculates base acres for a farm, the 
                planting and production of fruits or vegetables for 
                processing under paragraph (1) shall be considered to 
                be the same as the planting, prevented planting, or 
                production of the covered commodity.
                    ``(B) Authority.--Nothing in this subsection 
                provides authority for the Secretary to recalculate 
                base acres for a farm.''.
                                 <all>
```