alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 09/79-0454]

Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to Kidzui, Inc., 2448 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 105, San Diego, CA 92106.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., Associates of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own in the aggregate more than ten percent of Kidzui, Inc. Therefore this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring prior SBA approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: September 22, 2008.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. E8-23465 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

p0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148396

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148396

COA: 317652

Wayne CC: 11-008344-FC

ROOSEVELT BRYANT PRESCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 5, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2066

To extend the tax benefits available with respect to services performed in

a combat zone to services performed in the Sinai as part of the Multinational Force and Observers of the United Nations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 2001

Mr. TANNER (for himself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To extend the tax benefits available with respect to services

performed in a combat zone to services performed in

the Sinai as part of the Multinational Force and Observers of the United Nations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS FOR

4 SERVICES AS PART OF UNITED NATIONS

5 TRUCE SUPERVISION ORGANIZATION.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—For purposes of the following

7 provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a quali8 fied hazardous duty area shall be treated in the same man-
2

•HR 2066 IH

1 ner as if it were a combat zone (as determined under sec2 tion 112 of such Code):

3 (1) Section 2(a)(3) (relating to special rule

4 where deceased spouse was in missing status).

5 (2) Section 112 (relating to the exclusion of

6 certain combat pay of members of the Armed

7 Forces).

8 (3) Section 692 (relating to income taxes of

9 members of Armed Forces on death).

10 (4) Section 2201 (relating to members of the

11 Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of

12 combat-zone-incurred wounds, etc.).

13 (5) Section 3401(a)(1) (defining wages relating

14 to combat pay for members of the Armed Forces).

15 (6) Section 4253(d) (relating to the taxation of

16 phone service originating from a combat zone from

17 members of the Armed Forces).

18 (7) Section 6013(f )(1) (relating to joint return

19 where individual is in missing status).

20 (8) Section 7508 (relating to time for per21 forming certain acts postponed by reason of service

22 in combat zone).

23 (b) QUALIFIED HAZARDOUS DUTY AREA.—For pur24 poses of this section, the term ‘‘qualified hazardous duty

25 area’’ means any area of the Sinai during the period
3

•HR 2066 IH

1 (which includes the date of the enactment of this Act) that

2 any member of the Armed Forces of the United States

3 is serving with the Multinational Force and Observers of

4 the United Nations.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

6 on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Agee, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/Jeffrey D. Agee               Jeffrey D. AgeeChief Executive Officer Date:  March 15, 2010

----
EXHIBIT 32(i)(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



In connection with the Annual Report of A.G.
Edwards, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 6, 2005, hereof (the Report), I, Douglas L. Kelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A.G. EDWARDS, INC.




Date: May 4,
2005


|By: |  | /s/ Douglas L. KellyDouglas
L. Kelly Chief Financial Officer
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------






|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE 

 (For a Petty Offense) — Short Form

v. CASE NUMBER: 11-PO-00137-DLW 

CATHRINE ROST

STEVEN WELLS 

(Defendant's Attorney)

THE DEFENDANT: Plead guilty to count One of the Information.

ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilty of the following offense:

Title & Section Nature of Offense

Date Offense

Concluded

Count

Number(s)

16 U.S.C. 3, 18 U.S.C. 13

and C.R.S. 42-4-1301(b)

Driving While Ability Impaired July 27, 2011 One 
MONETARY OBLIGATIONS

All criminal monetary penalty payments are to be made as directed by the court, the probation

officer, or the United States Attorney.

Assessment CVB Fine

Total: $10.00 None $200.00

Additional Conditions:

1. Defendant shall perform 24 hours of community service and furnish proof of completion to

the Court.

2. Defendant shall complete an alcohol evaluation and furnish a copy of the evaluation and

recommendations to the Court by November 1, 2011. Defendant to advise the Court with what agency

and where any recommended treatment is to occur. Court recommends that alcohol evaluation and

any recommended treatment or program be completed by January 1, 2012.

3. Defendant shall have no moving violations for a period of one (1) year.

09/15/11

Date of Imposition of Judgment

 s/David L. West

Signature of Judicial Officer

David L. West, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Name and Title of Judicial Officer

 09/15/11

Date
09/15/11

Date of Imposition of Judgment

 s/David L. West

Signature of Judicial Officer

David L. West, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Name and Title of Judicial Officer

 09/15/11

Date
58142 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–23332 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–97] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–97 

with attached transmittal and policy 

justification. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department 

of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.003</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58143 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.026</GPH>
58144 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.027</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58145 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.028</GPH>
58146 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–23333 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–84] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–84 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
DeutscheBank EZ]

flobinso.r Boad PO. Box 3941

dilOFcgroffi.g i.n lumber: tm- g500426-8

PUmS TRANSFER CRED工 T ADVICE

OUR RE「 NIJDER : 45RS200804240080

SENDERS REF :

CHARCSS :

nN● L工NC FEE

mNDL工 NG FEE 

COMM NL工

`0

24-APR-2008

WB HAVE RBCE工 VED FUNDS

CURRENCY : uSD

VALOE EL■TE : 24-APR-2008

WIIIEAT RIDG口 , CO

DETA工 LS OF PAYplENT :

BENEF REF : S3■ 3734工 CP042300

AS DETATLED BELOW 

AMO― :

EX RATB :

NV RATE :

500,000_OO

_0000000000

_0000000000

OR工G工NATOR : ORIG工 NATINC BANK:

IINIVBRSAL CONSULTINC RES00RCgs, TTC BANK OF AMER工 CA/Nl・X

3250 BEVroN sT APT 07

802■2-7065

_000

COM140NICAT工 ON EXPENSE

CT,選 :。sD

ARCANOM EOu工 TY FUND LLC

3■ 6 mRR工 ERS PLACE

BRADENTON′ FL 342■ 2

0SA N― DA

500′ 000 00 CR

noL signed by the bank

ONITED STATES OF

 GOVERNMENT

 EXHIBIT

 9

CoDfj-rmations are

NSOWERS 002327

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-9 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
#### Frank BOYD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SERVICE DRAYAGE COMPANY, Inc., Defendant and Appellee.

No. 13905.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 30, 1931.

Jewell A. Sperling, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Milner & Porteous and W. A. Porteous, Jr., all of New Orleans, for appellee.

*769WESTERFIELD, J.

This is an action ex delicto. Plaintiff claims to have been injured due to the negligence of defendant’s employees, in that the driver of a large drayage truck, to which was attached a trailer, prematurely started it at a time when plaintiff was assisting in the uncoupling of the trailer, with the result that plaintiff’s leg was fractured. The defendant denied that plaintiff had anything to do with the uncoupling of the trailer from the truck, and maintains that, as the truck started off, the plaintiff made a run for it with the intention of climbing upon it, placing his foot upon one of the springs, which was covered with grease, causing him to slip and fall under the truck.

The sole issue, one of fact, was decided adversely to plaintiff in the court below, and, after carefully considering the testimony in the record, we see no reason to disturb the judgment, since it seems to be amply supported by the record.

■ For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONSEAN JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 325 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RONSEAN JOHNSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 326 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of April, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF HPSC, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Domestic
                     Name of Subsidiary                             Jurisdiction               Ownership
                     ------------------                             ------------               ---------
<S>                                                                 <C>                        <C>
HPSC Equipment Receivables 2000 LLC I                                    DE                         *
HPSC Equipment Receivables 2000 LLC II                                   DE                         *
American Commercial Finance Corporation                                  DE                         *
HPSC Funding Corp. I                                                     DE                         *
HPSC Bravo Funding Corp.                                                 DE                         *
HPSC Capital Funding Inc.                                                DE                         *
HPSC Bravo Funding, LLC                                                  DE                         *
HPSC Capital Funding, LLC                                                DE                         *
</TABLE>

*Owned 100% by HPSC, Inc.
#### In the Matter of Victor Orzechowski, an Attorney.

Fourth Department,

December 21,1990

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Harold, J. Boreanaz*for respondent.

*Gerard M. LaRusso*for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this court on February 28, 1974. He was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York on March 3, 1986, for the crimes of conspiracy (18 USC § 371) to *274commit fraud against the United States by obstructing and defeating the lawful functions of the IRS, in violation of 26 USC § 7206 and aiding and procuring and advising the preparation and presentation to the IRS of tax return forms for taxpayers which were false in violation of 26 USC § 7206 (2).

On April 3, 1986, this court found that respondent had been convicted of “serious crimes” within the meaning of Judiciary Law §90 (4) (d) and, pursuant to Judiciary Law §90 (4) (f), temporarily suspended respondent from practice and directed him to show cause why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be entered (119 AD2d 1012). On December 19, 1986, respondent appeared before this court and requested a hearing in mitigation. A hearing was subsequently held before a Referee and we have reviewed the Referee’s report.

Under New York law, respondent’s conduct could have resulted in a conviction for conspiracy in the fifth degree, a class A misdemeanor (Penal Law § 105.05) and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, also a class A misdemeanor. Accordingly, we find respondent guilty of serious professional misconduct.

We conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective as of April 3,1986, and until further order of the court.

Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Final order of suspension entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g).
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, October 
1, 2008 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    Item 1: The Commission will hear oral argument on an appeal by Gary 
M. Kornman from an initial decision of an administrative law judge 
barring him from associating with any broker, dealer, or investment 
adviser. The law judge based her decision to impose associational bars 
on Kornman's having been criminally convicted of making a false 
statement to the Commission in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. Issues 
likely to be considered include whether it is in the public interest to 
bar Kornman from association with any broker, dealer, or investment 
adviser.
    Item 2: The Commission will hear oral argument on an appeal by 
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. (``Nature's Sunshine'') from an 
initial decision of an administrative law judge. The law judge found 
that Nature's Sunshine had violated Section 13(a) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 and Exchange Act Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 by failing 
to file any annual report on Form 10-K since filing its Form 10-K for 
the year ended December 31, 2004, and by failing to file any quarterly 
report on Form 10-Q with financial statements that had been reviewed by 
a registered independent public accounting firm since filing its Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Issues likely to be 
considered include whether it is necessary or appropriate for the 
protection of investors to revoke the registration of Nature's 
Sunshine's common stock.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22830 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Case 1:11-cv-01976-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01976-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01976-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01976-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Beede Site Group

v. Case No. 08-cv-319-PB

Leo P. LaRochelle, et al.

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case. The case

shall be assigned to another judge. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 11, 2009

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00319-WES Document 20 Filed 06/11/09 Page 1 of 1
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have

no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________
No. 95-20464

(Summary Calendar)

_______________

DANIEL R. BRUCE, also known as EVAN A HOOK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-94-CV-1361)

_______________________________________________

December 13, 1995 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel R. Bruce appeals the district court's order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 pro se petition for habeas corpus

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We vacate and

remand.

In his habeas petition, Bruce challenged the legality of

act ions taken by the United States Parole Commission in revoking1 Bruce was subsequently moved to Collier County Jail in Naples,

Florida.

-2- his parole and calculating his remaining sentence. Bruce also

a lleged that he failed to receive credit for time served. To

entertain a § 2241 habeas petition, the district court must have

jurisdiction over the prisoner. U .S. v. Gabor
, 905 F.2d 76, 77-78

(5th Cir. 1990); Blau v. United States
, 566 F.2d 526, 527 (5th Cir.

1978). A prisoner is required to file his § 2241 petition in the

jurisdiction in which he is incarcerated. Gabor , 905 F.2d at 78.

At the time of his petition, Bruce was incarcerated i n a federal

peniten tiary in Littleton, Colorado. 1 Therefore, the Southern

District of Texas lacked jurisdiction to hear Bruce's § 2241 habeas

petition. Id.

For the forgoing reason, we VACATE the district court's

decision and REMAND the habeas pe tition with instructions to

DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction.