alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Patrick J. Lawlor, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Giga-tronics, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: 6/14/07            /s/ Patrick J. Lawlor         Patrick J. Lawlor    VP Finance, CFO and Secretary  
46
BRITANNIA CAPITAL CORPORATION
             (INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE)

     This certifies that ---------- is the registered owner of  ----------------
fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock, $.001 par value each of

                          BRITANNIA CAPITAL CORPORATION

     Transferable  on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon
surrender of this  Certificate  duly endorsed or assigned.  This Certificate and
the shares  represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware,
and to the Certificate of Incorporation  and By-laws of the Corporation,  as now
or hereafter amended.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the
Transfer Agent

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile  signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

 Dated: ----------------

                          BRITANNIA CAPITAL CORPORATION

 /s/Leah Balderson                CORPORATE SEAL            /s/ Shane Lowry
 ------------------                    2000                --------------------
   Secretary                         DELAWARE                 President

                                                                 Countersigned:
                                         Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co., Inc.
                                                                  Transfer Agent

                                                           AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

 <PAGE>

     The following  abbreviations,  when used in the  inscription on the face of
this  certificate,  shall be  construed  as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common
TEN ENT - as tenants by the  entireties
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
         in common and not as community property

 UNIFORM GIFTS TO MINORS ACT

 ( Custodian)                       (Minor)
 under the Uniform Gifts of Minors Act of  the State of ------------------

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto:

 Please insert social security or other identifying number: -----------------

 (Insert name and address, including zip code):

 ----------------------------------------------------

 ----------------------------------------------------

 --------------------------------------------- shares

of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint

 ----------------------------------------------------

to transfer the said shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

 DATED: -------------                  ---------------------------------------

     NOTICE:  The signature to this  assignment must correspond with the name as
it is  written  upon the face of the  Certificate  in every  particular  without
alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.

 SIGNATURE GUARANTEE:
Case 1:08-cv-00353-JL   Document 4   Filed 09/02/08   Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02319-BNB

CLIFFORD A. WOODS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EL PASO COUNTY PROGRAMS,

JANIT KING, and

FRAN LA PAGE,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 

Plaintiff, Clifford A. Woods, currently is detained at the El Paso County Jail in

Colorado Springs, Colorado. Mr. Woods, acting pro se, filed a Prisoner Complaint and

a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland granted the § 1915 Motion on October 3, 2011.

Magistrate Judge Boland directed Mr. Woods to pay the full amount of the

$350.00 filing fee in installments and to pay an initial partial filing fee of $7.00 within

thirty days or to show cause why he has no assets and no means to pay the initial fee

by filing a current certified copy of his trust fund account statement. The October 3

Order warns Mr. Woods that if he fails to have the initial partial filing fee sent to the

Clerk of the Court by the designated deadline or to show cause why he has no assets

and no means by which to pay the initial fee the Complaint would be dismissed without

further notice.

Case 1:11-cv-02319-LTB Document 12 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Mr. Woods has failed to communicate with the Court. As a result, he has not

paid the initial partial filing fee within the time allowed or, in the alternative, shown cause

why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee.

Accordingly, it is

 ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for Mr. Woods’ failure either to pay a $7.00

initial partial filing fee or to show cause why he has no assets and no means by which to

pay the designated fee. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 8th day of November , 2011.

 BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court 

Case 1:11-cv-02319-LTB Document 12 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Johnson, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 51]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), rendered May 21, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court denied his severance motion. We disagree. “It is well settled that severance motions are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court * * * Severance is not required solely because of hostilities among the defendants, differences in their trial strategies, or inconsistencies in their defenses, and is compelled only where the core of each defense is in irreconcilable conflict with the other and where there is a significant danger that the conflict alone would lead the jury to infer a defendant’s guilt” *(People v Echevarria,*282 AD2d 470, 471 [internal quotation marks omitted]). The defenses of the defendant and the codefendant were identical, namely, that they were mere innocent bystanders who happened upon a robbery already in progress. Therefore, the defendant failed to demonstrate that the codefendant’s defense was in irreconcilable, conflict with his *(see People v Mahboubian,*74 NY2d 174; *People v Leon,*265 AD2d 344).

The trial court properly permitted the People to rehabilitate the credibility of an accomplice-witness on redirect examination by eliciting certain portions of a letter written by that accomplice-witness. The record reveals that the defendant “opened the door” to such questioning by eliciting portions of that same letter during cross-examination of that same accomplice-witness. The “opening the door” theory “merely allows a party to explain or clarify on redirect matters that have been put in issue for the first time on cross-examination” *(People v Melendez,*55 NY2d 445, 452). Moreover, “in situations where only a part of a statement has been brought out on cross-examination, the other parts may be introduced on redirect examination for the purpose of explaining or clarifying the statement” *(People v Melendez, supra*at 451-452). The People’s redirect examination of the accomplice-witness was properly limited to the subject matter of cross-examination *(see People v Boyd,*58 NY2d 1016).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those *423raised, in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant To


Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John
Lackland, Chief Financial Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





1.
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
      30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or
      78o(d)); and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  August
16, 2010





BY:
              /s/ John LacklandJohn
      LacklandChief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS 

 Defendant. 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

 Ridley, McGreevy & Winocur, P.C., by William L. Taylor and Darlene A. Bagley, hereby enters 

its appearance as counsel for Defendant John Phillip Gallegos in the above-captioned matter. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 13th day of October, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted. 

 /s/ William L. Taylor

William L. Taylor, #21098 

/s/ Darlene A. Bagley 

Darlene A. Bagley, #35728 

RIDLEY, MCGREEVY & WINOCUR P.C.

303 16th Street, Suite 200 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 629-9700 

Fax: (303) 629-9702 

E-Mail: wltaylorpc@gmail.com; 

taylor@ridleylaw.com; 

bagley@ridleylaw.com

Attorneys for John Phillip Gallegos 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 36 filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 13th day of October, 2011, I served a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing ENTRY OF APPEARANCE via CM/ECF filing to all parties listed therein 

including: 

Linda Kaufman 

Assistant United States Attorney 

United States Attorney’s Office 

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

Telephone: (303) 454-0100 

FAX: (303) 454-0401 

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Government 

Edward A. Pluss 

Assistant Federal Public Defender 

633 17th Street, Suite 1000 

Denver, CO 80202 

Telephone: (303) 294-7002 

FAX: (303) 294-1192 

Edward_Pluss@fd.org 

Attorney for Defendant 

Paula M. Ray 

Paula M. Ray, P.C. 

P.O. Box 12554 

Denver, CO 80212-0554 

Telephone: 303-874-5170 

Email: paulamray@earthlink.net

 /s/ Suzy M. Kamps 

 Suzy M. Kamps 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 36 filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORRAINE MANATT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel its

Department of Business and Industry,

Division of Industrial Relations,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-16668

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00505-LRHVPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 8, 2016** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HAWKINS and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges and BREYER,

*** District

Judge.

 

FILED

FEB 25 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Charles R. Breyer, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Lorraine Manatt, a former industrial hygienist with the Nevada Department of

Business and Industry (the “Department”), appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment in favor of the Department on Manatt’s retaliation claim brought

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–3(a). 

We agree with the district court that Manatt failed to raise a genuine issue of

material fact on whether the “adverse employment actions” taken by the Department

were motivated by Manatt reporting a racist video that another employee had shown

at her workplace. See Ray v. Henderson, 217 F.3d 1234, 1240 (9th Cir. 2000). Even

assuming Manatt had made a prima facie case of retaliation, she also failed to raise a

genuine issue of material fact on whether the reasons offered by the Department for

its actions were a pretext for unlawful discrimination. See Steiner v. Showboat

Operating Co., 25 F.3d 1459, 1464–65 (9th Cir. 1994). The district court thus

properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Department on Manatt’s Title VII

retaliation claim.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                    |  |                                                                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 10, 2011 |  | /s/ CLAUDE J. JORDAN 
Claude J. Jordan,
President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof WorldHeart Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard Juelis, Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of September 30, 2005.

 
| Dated:    November 9,  2005 | /s/ *  Richard Juelis                         |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | Richard  Juelis, Vice President, Finance      |
|                                                 | and  Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                                                 | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----

*******                **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case 1:11-cv-02388-REB-KLM Document 20 Filed 01/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-137325, 333-104835, 333-104458, 333-88382, 333-35318, 333-35208, 333-86113, 333-09721, 333-01649, 333-01651, and 033-60259 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 8, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of West Coast Bancorp and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, OregonFebruary 8, 2007

80

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58591-58592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time:  Wednesday, October 8, 2008 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

[[Page 58592]]


Items To Be Discussed:  Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-10:  VoterVoter.com by Joseph M. 
Birkenstock, Esquire.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-11:  Lawrence Martin E. Brown.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-12:  Independent Party of Oregon by Linda 
K. Williams, Esquire.

Management and Administrative Matters. 

Person To Contact for Information:  Robert Biersack, Press Officer; 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-23649 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------




CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the six months ended
June 30, 2004, William Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of ZAP, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the six months ended June 30, 2004,fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
     Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the six months
     ended June 30, 2004,fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.






/s/  William Hartman
---------------------
William Hartman
Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
126846-49 & (165) Michael F. Cavanagh (166)(182)(183) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 46 TH CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant, Justices Third-Party Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 126846-49 COA: 246823, 248593, 251390, 252335 Crawford CC: 02-005951-CZ CRAWFORD COUNTY and CRAWFORD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendants, Counter-Plaintiffs, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, and

OTSEGO COUNTY, Third-Party Defendant, and

KALKASKA COUNTY, Intervening Third-Party Plaintiff, Counter Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of December 28, 20 05, the application for leav e to appeal the July 7, 2004 and August 2, 2004 orders of the Cour t of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant were held in abeyance pending the decision in 46 th Circuit Trial Court v Crawford County (Docket No. 128878). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 28, 2006, 476 Mich 131 (2006), the applications are again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the orders of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this ca se to the Court of Appeals, which shall hold this case in abeyance pending its decision on remand in 46th

Circuit Trial Court v Crawford County (Court of Appeals Docket Nos. 246823, 248593 and 251390). After 46th Circuit Trial Court v Crawford County is decided on remand, the Court of Appeals shall reconsider this case._______________________________________ __ 2

The stay of the circuit court’s awards of attorney fees ente red by this Court on October 1, 2004, and continue d by order of December 28, 2005 , remains in effect until completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

The motions for immediate consideration and for peremptory reversal are DENIED. A public question bei ng involved, and in light of the relationships between the parties, no costs are awarded.

K ELLY , J., would deny leave to appeal.

d1025 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2006

Clerk