alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57633-57634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Child Support Enforcement

AGENCY: Office of Child Support Enforcement, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice to award a sole-source discretionary grant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA#: 93.564.
    Legislative Authority: Section 1115 of the Social Security Act [42 
U.S.C.1315] provides funds and authority to award grants to State IV-D 
agencies for experimental, pilot, or demonstration projects.
    Amount of Award: $703,000.00.
    Project Period: September 30, 2008-February 27, 2010.

SUMMARY: A sole-source discretionary grant is being awarded to the 
Office of the Attorney General, Texas, to provide marriage and 
relationship education, parenting skills training, case management and 
home-visiting activities to unwed, new or expectant parents in Tom 
Green and Harris counties, Texas. The project will examine child 
support outcomes of families in the treatment and control groups from 
this project and from a previous project. This grant will also enable 
collection of data on child well-being outcomes, such as number of 
well-baby health visits, immunizations, home-safety (using a 
standardized checklist completed by a home visitor), child development 
(using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, a standardized tool), and 
quality of the home environment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myles Schlank, Supervisory Program 
Specialist, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 370 L'Enfant 
Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20047. Telephone:

[[Page 57634]]

(202) 401-9329, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#680511040d1b461b0b000409060328090b0e4600001b460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ef3e7f2fbedb0edfdf6f2fff0f5defffdf8b0f6f6edb0f9f1e8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
Donna Bonar,
Deputy Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8-23310 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Elijah DAWSON, Jr., Appellant, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 4550.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Eastland.

June 9, 1972.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1972.

Bailey, Williams, Westfall & Henderson, David Westfall, Dallas, for appellant.

John D. Griggs, Dallas, for appellees.

WALTER, Justice.

Elijah Dawson, Jr. recovered a judgment against Mrs. Z. Anita McMillan and Louie J. McMillan for $900 actual damages and against Louie J. McMillan for $2,000 exemplary damages. The McMillans were principals on a surety bond executed by the Standard Accident Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company is its successor in interest. Dawson filed suit against Reliance to recover on the bond and recovered a judgment for $900 and he has appealed from such judgment because the court refused to award him a judgment for the $2,000 exemplary damages he recovered against Louie.

The parties agree that the question to be decided is whether the court erred in failing to award him exemplary damages under the bond. The parties stipulated that two real estate brokers or salesman’s license bonds with Louie J. McMillan and Mrs. Z. Anita McMillan as principals were in effect with the insurance company, and the company did not participate in any action that the McMillans had with Dawson.

United States Fire Insurance Company v. McDaniel, 408 S.W.2d 134 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1966, no writ hist.) passes upon the question involved in this case as follows :

> “We find no valid distinction between the coverage under the bond in the present case and the sequestration and attachment bonds, as to exemplary damages. We do not think the words ‘any judgment’ were intended to define the coverage under the Real Estate Broker’s bond, but were intended to designate the condition of liability. That is, that a judgment must first be obtained against the principal before the surety becomes liable. The words ‘for damages or injuries caused by violation of this act’ define the coverage. We find no more reason to hold a surety liable for exemplary damages under this bond than the sequestration and attachment bonds. We feel that we are compelled to follow the precedence set in those cases cited to us.”

The appellant has presented no authority to support his point of error. His point is overruled.

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 16 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 16 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 16 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 16 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 16 Filed 02/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending July 18, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFVCBANKSHARES, INC.                                                                                                     3A1FVCBankshares, Inc., Fairfax, Virginia, has submitted a notification to become a one bank holding company for First Virginia Community Bank, Fairfax, Virginia.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          62,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,894,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     44,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,128,256
<PP&E>                                       3,656,407
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,182,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,694,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,222,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,024
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,212,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,694,521
<SALES>                                         19,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,919,294
<CGS>                                           18,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,515,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               349,199
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 525 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1245 

[Report No. 110–237] 

To reform mutual aid agreements for the National Capital Region. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. WEBB) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To reform mutual aid agreements for the National Capital 

Region. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

•S 1245 RS

1 SECTION 1. REFORM OF MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS FOR 

2 THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION. 

3 Section 7302 of the Intelligence Reform and Ter4 rorism Prevention Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 5196 note) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘, includ8 ing its agents or authorized volunteers,’’; and 

9 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘or 

10 town’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘town, 

11 or other governmental agency, governmental au12 thority, or governmental institution with the 

13 power to sue or be sued in its own name, within 

14 the National Capital Region.’’; 

15 (2) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter pre16 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘, the Wash17 ington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the 

18 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, and 

19 any other governmental agency or authority’’; and 

20 (3) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘or employ21 ees’’ each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘, 

22 employees, or agents’’. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN

cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
Calendar No. 525 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1245 

[Report No. 110

–237] 

A BILL 

To reform mutual aid agreements for the National 

Capital Region. 

DECEMBER 6, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Genomic Sequencing Centers for 
Infectious Diseases.
    Date: October 23, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Holiday Inn-Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue-Name 
Change to Crowne Plaza, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health/
NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, RM 3266, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7616, 301-451-2671, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d1d1d2d2d5c9f0ded9d1d9d49eded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1776767575726e57797e767e7339797e7f39707861">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, lmmunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-23050 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW

JOEL HUGHES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICER WESLEY KVASNICKA; and 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Jointly and Severally,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Amend the

Scheduling Order (ECF #23) to Extend the Deadline for Filing Dispositive Motions

(Docket No. 48) is GRANTED as follows. The Scheduling Order (Docket No. 23) is

amended so as to extend the deadline to file dispositive motions up to and including

February 11, 2013.

Date: January 11, 2013 

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 57 Filed 01/11/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cragar
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael L. Hartzmark, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2003
                                           /s/   Michael L. Hartzmark
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael L. Hartzmark
                                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William D. Cox, chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  October 2, 2003              /s/ William D. Cox
                                    -----------------------------
                                    William D. Cox
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    October 2, 2003
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6940

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDRÉ TERRY HALL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-92, CA-97-745-R) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Richard Nordman, Westerville, Ohio; Malcolm McLeod Doubles, Salem, Virginia, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:André T. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reinstate his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hall , Nos. CR-94-92, CA-97-745-R (W.D. Va. June 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                9
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               3,508
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  96
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     3,457
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         14,318
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               5,119
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 5,193
<LOANS>                                             56,566
<ALLOWANCE>                                            895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      87,291
<DEPOSITS>                                          77,283
<SHORT-TERM>                                            63
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  1,866
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,006
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                      87,291
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      4,976
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    1,258
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       332
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     6,567
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   2,964
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      87
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                3,516
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           66
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      2,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,483
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           1,483
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,063
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                            424
<LOANS-PAST>                                           162
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                       738
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                        313
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       889
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           81
<RECOVERIES>                                            21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      895
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                   895
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, William S. Miraglia, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PhotonicProducts Group, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 14, 2004

 
|   | /s/ William  S. Miraglia |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | William S.  Miraglia     |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:11-cv-02430-WYD-KMT Document 11-1 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:11-cv-02430-WYD-KMT Document 11-1 Filed 11/22/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2