Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-58710; File No. SR-ISE-2008-63] 

## I. Introduction 

                    On July 31, 2008, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (“Exchange” or “ISE”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          a                           ( print page 59009)                        proposed rule change to modify its Price Improvement Mechanism (“PIM”) auction eligibility requirements to eliminate the requirement that there be at least three market makers quoting in the relevant series. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 27, 2008.[3]                                          The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.                 

## II. Description of the Proposal 

                    The Exchange's PIM auction process currently allows Electronic Access Members (“EAMs”) to enter two-sided orders (“Crossing Transaction”) to provide better prices than the ISE best bid or offer to agency orders.[4]                                          The customer side of these orders is then exposed to other members to give them an opportunity to participate in the trade at the proposed cross price or better. ISE's current rules require, among other things, that an EAM enter an order into the PIM only when there are at least three market makers quoting in the options series.[5]                                          The Exchange is now proposing to eliminate this requirement.                 

## III. Discussion 

                    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[6]                                          which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.[7] 

                    ISE's current requirement that there must be at least three market makers quoting in the option series at the time an EAM enters an order into the PIM was designed, in part, to increase the likelihood of competition in the auction. In approving ISE's proposal to establish the PIM, the Commission stated that it believed that the three market maker requirement would “improve the opportunity for an [a]gency [o]rder to be exposed to a competitive auction.” [8] 

                    ISE rules permit all members to enter improvement orders into the PIM for their own account or for the account of a public customer.[9]                                          Because of this opportunity for broad participation in PIM auctions, the Commission believes that orders submitted to the PIM will continue to be exposed to a meaningful, competitive auction, even without the three market maker requirement. For this reason, the Commission finds that ISE's proposal to eliminate the three market maker requirement is consistent with the Act.                 

## IV. Conclusion 

*It is therefore ordered*                    , pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[10]                                          that the proposed rule change (SR-ISE-2008-63) be, and hereby is, approved.                 

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[11] 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58401 (August 21, 2008), 73 FR 50663.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8, 2004), 69 FR 75093 (December 15, 2004) (approving rules implementing the PIM).                         *See also*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57847 (May 21, 2008), 73 FR 30987 (May 29, 2008) (approving a proposed rule change to permit a member to enter an agency order into the PIM at a price that is equal to the national best bid or offer (“NBBO”) when the ISE's best bid or offer is inferior to the NBBO).                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                                                     *See*                         ISE Rule 723(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation.                         *See*15 U.S.C. 78c(f).                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50819 (December 8, 2004), 69 FR 75093, 75096 (December 15, 2004).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                                                     *See*                         ISE Rule 723(c)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

10.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-23842 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P