alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>                            This  schedule  contains  summary  financial
                                    information  extracted  from  the  financial
                                    statements of Obie Media  Corporation  which
                                    are included in its quarterly  report,  Form
                                    10-QSB,  for the quarter ended February,  28
                                    1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
                                    reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,398,083
<ALLOWANCES>                          118,284
<INVENTORY>                                 0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    2,587,023
<PP&E>                             11,684,906
<DEPRECIATION>                      2,983,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,962,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               2,717,095
<BONDS>                             7,164,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                            6,131,147
<OTHER-SE>                         (3,271,946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,962,774
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,737,505
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,557,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      158,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    153,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       171,974
<INCOME-TAX>                           65,783
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   106,191
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          106,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .03
<FN>
<F1>                            Information not included in Financial Statements
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 16, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.127 Issuers of Asset-Backed Securities ABSs** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Mohammed Al Salah, Appellant, v Mohammed Saad Shaaban, Also Known as Mike Saad, Respondent.

In an action to recover on promissory notes, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated January 13, 1989, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the promissory notes executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant’s affidavit in opposition, alleging as a defense that a stock transfer had occurred in lieu of payment of the balance due on the notes, raised a triable issue of fact sufficient to defeat the plaintiff’s summary judgment motion *(cf., Ehrlich v American Moninger Greenhouse Mfg. Corp.,*26 NY2d 255, 259; *see, Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.,*3 NY2d 395; *Esteve v Abad,*271 App Div 725). Brown, J. P., Hooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
AMENDMENT AND WAIVER

Reference is made to the First Amendment and Waiver (the "Amendment"), dated as
of March 14, 1996, of a certain Stock and Note Purchase Agreement dated as of
December 15, 1993, between INRAD, Inc. (the "Company") and Clarex Limited, a
Cayman Islands company ("Clarex") and William P. Nicklin of Newburgh, New York
("Nicklin").

WHEREAS, the Company has requested Clarex and Nicklin to restructure the
previous Amendment as to waive certain covenants.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements herin
contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.   Clarex and Nicklin hereby waive the 1996 fiscal year violation of
     subsection 7.12(a) as amended in the Amendment of the Letter Agreement
     pertaining to cash debt service (EBITDA) > 1.5x. In addition, subsection
     7.12(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety. The Company shall continue to
     adhere to the financial covenant of maintaining a debt to the eligible
     accounts receivable ratio of .80x.

      INRAD, Inc.             Clarex Limited        William F. Nicklin


-------------------------  ----------------------  ---------------------

by    Warren Ruderman      by
      President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS

KATHRYN KIPLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Minnesota

Division of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Defendant.

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

The parties appeared this morning for a status conference. Consistent with matters

discussed there:

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The case schedule is modified to the following extent:

Discovery Cut-Off: February 28, 2013.

(All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All

written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or

before the discovery cut-off.)

Remaining Discovery is limited to the following: 

5 depositions per side;

10 interrogatories per side; and

15 requests for production per side.

 

Expert Disclosures:

The defendant shall designate all rebuttal experts

and provide opposing counsel with all information

specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 57 Filed 11/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

January 31, 2013.

(2) A final pretrial conference will be held in this case on March 25, 2013, at 8:30

a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street,

Denver, Colorado. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the

court no later than March 18, 2013.

(3) A four day jury trial is set for May 13-16, 2013, in Courtroom 401, 4th floor,

Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Trial days

commence at 8:30 a.m., and run until 5:00 p.m.

Dated November 29, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 57 Filed 11/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57618-57619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-89-000]


Kansas City Power & Light Company; Notice of Filing

September 29, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 23, 2008, Kansas City Power & Light 
Company filed a petition for declaratory order, pursuant to Rule 207 of 
the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 57619]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52141700111d3c3e3b3c37012722223d202612343720317c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e585b4c5d51707277707b4d6b6e6e716c6a5e787b6c7d30797168">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 23, 2008.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23361 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

 JUDGE PHILIP A. BRIMMER

 COURTROOM MINUTES

Courtroom Deputy: Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Court Reporter: Janet Coppock

Probation Officer: Sergio Garza

Date: February 17, 2012 

Time: 27 minutes

Interpreter: Marcella Salazar

CASE NO. 11-CR-00343-PAB

Parties Counsel

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lillian Alves

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOEL MELKIN BANEGAS-PACHECO, Edward Pluss

Defendant.

SENTENCING

9:03 a.m. COURT IN SESSION

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Defendant is present and in custody.

Interpreter sworn with no challenges to her/his qualifications.

ORDERED: The statement of facts in the Plea Agreement and the Presentence Report

are not disputed by the parties and are adopted in the Court's factual findings in this case.

The report is incorporated by reference as part of the Court’s findings and conclusions.

Case 1:11-cr-00343-PAB Document 29 Filed 02/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Page Two

11-CR-00343-PAB

February 17, 2012

ORDERED: Defendant’s Amended Objections to Presentence Investigation Report (Doc

#28), is WITHDRAWN.

ORDERED: United States’ Motion for 1-Level Variance in Defendant’s Offense Level for

Acceptance of Appellate Waiver (Doc #17), is GRANTED.

Argument by Mr. Pluss in support of defendant’s Motions for Non-Guideline Sentence and

comments addressing sentencing.

Argument by Ms. Alves and comments addressing sentencing.

Defendant addresses the Court.

Court states its findings and conclusions.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motions for Non-Guideline Sentences (Docs #20 and 22), are

 DENIED.

Statement by the Court regarding defendant's offense level, criminal history level and

sentencing guidelines range.

Defendant entered his plea on November 1, 2011 to the one count Indictment. 

ORDERED: Court ACCEPTS the Plea Agreement.

Court considers statutory factors of 18 USC § 3553(a) in arriving at sentence.

ORDERED: Defendant shall be imprisoned for 51 months.

ORDERED: Defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the

defendant as directed by the probation officer. 

Defendant is advised that if he enters or remains in the United States illegally, possesses

a firearm or illegally possesses a controlled substance, he/she may be subject to further

federal prosecutions.

ORDERED: Defendant advised of right to appeal. To the extent to which the defendant

has waived some appellate rights, he is directed to consult with the plea

agreement and his attorney.

Case 1:11-cr-00343-PAB Document 29 Filed 02/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Page Three

11-CR-00343-PAB

February 17, 2012

ORDERED: A copy of the presentence report shall be forwarded to the U.S. Bureau of

Prisons and the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

ORDERED: Defendant is REMANDED to the custody of the U.S. Marshal.

9:30 a.m. COURT IN RECESS

Total in court time: 17 minutes

Hearing concluded

Case 1:11-cr-00343-PAB Document 29 Filed 02/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58252-58253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, November 15, 2008, 
10 am to November 15, 2008, 12 pm, National Institutes of Health, 
Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD, 20852 
which was published in the Federal Register on September 26, 2008, 
73FR55859.
    The meeting date has been changed to November 14, 2008 and the time 
has been changed to start at 11 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. The meeting 
location remains

[[Page 58253]]

the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 30, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-23596 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 29, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 29, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22A1115. SHELBY ELDER v. BEHAVORIAL HEALTH SERVICES OF SOUTH GEORGIA.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,728
<INVENTORY>                                     77,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,259
<PP&E>                                          59,069
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,096
<BONDS>                                        162,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                        (50)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,990
<SALES>                                      1,172,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,172,271
<CGS>                                        1,087,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
S. 1352

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 127 East 

Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office 

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        317,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,727
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,968
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,489
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,719
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify
that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ BRUCE W. TAYLOR    
|                        |  |  |  | Bruce W. Taylor        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 5, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ ROBIN VANCASTLE    
|                        |  |  |  | Robin VanCastle        
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Clarence J. Pearl, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 816]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cannizzaro, J.), entered July 15, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is currently serving a prison sentence of IV2 to 3 years for his 2002 conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree committed while he was on parole after serving four years on concurrent sentences of 372 to 7 years and 3 to 6 years for two convictions of burglary in the third degree. In February 2004, petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was denied. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the Board appropriately considered the relevant statutory factors, including the nature of the offense, receipt of an earned eligibility certificate, clean disciplinary record, plans upon release and his prior criminal history, in determining that petitioner’s release would be incompatible with the safety and welfare of the community *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [1] [a]; [2] [c] [A]; *see also Matter of Rivera v Travis,*289 AD2d 829, 830 [2001]; *Matter of Guerin v New York State Div. of Parole,*276 AD2d 899, 900 [2000]). Although petitioner received an earned eligibility certificate, this does not entitle petitioner to discretionary parole release *(see Matter of Barad v New York State Bd. of Parole,*275 AD2d 856 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 702 [2001]). Moreover, the Board is not required to give equal weight to or specifically discuss every factor it considered in reaching its conclusion regarding parole release *(see Matter of Larmon v Travis,*14 AD3d 960 [2005]). Inasmuch as the Board’s determination does not evidence “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]), we find no reason to disturb it.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.