alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dan Cornell ROSEMOND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 43910.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 28, 1972.

See also Tex.Cr.App., 464 S.W.2d 156.

Charles W. Yuill, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.

*872Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., and W. T. Westmoreland, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

Appellant was convicted of felony theft on March IS, 1968; his punishment was assessed at ten (10) years and he was placed on probation. Among the conditions of probation were that he:

> “(a) Commit no offenses against the laws of this or any other State or of the United States . . .”

> “(d) . . .”

> “(j) • • •”

> "(k) • • •”

On April 16, 1970, the State filed a motion to revoke appellant’s probation alleging he violated the following probationary conditions:

> “. . . Commit no offenses against the laws of this or any other State or of the United States . . . (D) . . (j) . . . (k) . . . .”

The State in its brief concedes that the evidence is insufficient to support the revocation under paragraphs (d), (j) and (k). We must, therefore, determine if the evidence is sufficient to support the order of revocation under paragraph (a).

The State offered no proof in support of (a).

Appellant testifying in his own behalf admitted on cross-examination that he had been convicted of a misdemeanor offense of carrying a prohibited weapon on March 2, 1970 and that he was arrested for such offense which had occurred during the term of his probation on February 20, 1970.

Appellant’s admissions are sufficient to sustain the revocation of appellant’s probation. Sasueda v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 289.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

ROBERTS, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Mitchell Gross
-----------------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
February 3, 2005
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 10-Q/A
 Amendment
No. 2
 
 (Mark One)
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission file number 000-21827
 Amscan Holdings, Inc.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
    
    13-3911462(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)80 Grasslands Road Elmsford, NY(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    10523(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code:(914) 345-2020
 þ o
  Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o o þ




---



##### 



Explanatory
Note
  2




---



##### 



AMSCAN HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    /s/ Michael A. CorrealeMichael A. CorrealeDate: December 9, 2008
    
    Chief Financial Officer
(on behalf of the registrant and as principal
financial and accounting officer) 3
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Gregory A. Gould, state and certify that, based on my knowledge:


1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2002 of Colorado
MEDtech, Inc. (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Colorado
MEDtech, Inc.


Date: May 21, 2003


/s/ Gregory A. Gould
------------------------------
Name: Gregory A. Gould
Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23892]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Spencer Chemical Company/Jayhawk Works near Pittsburg, 
Kansas, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. 
On August 15, 2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    All Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who worked at 
Spencer Chemical Company/Jayhawk Works near Pittsburg, Kansas, from 
January 1, 1956 through December 31, 1961 for a number of work days 
aggregating at least 250 work days occurring either solely under 
this employment or in combination with work days within the 
parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 
the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on September 14, 2008, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on September 14, 
2008, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this 
notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2ada1a3b1a2a1a6a1cca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="622d212331222126214c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 22, 2008.
Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
 [FR Doc. E8-23892 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


The Employment Agreement between The viaLink Company ("viaLink") and Robert I.
Noe dated the 8th day of April, 1999 is amended as follows:

1.   The first sentence of Section 6.1 shall be deleted and replaced with the
     following sentence: "Except as hereinafter set forth, the term ("Term) of
     this Agreement shall commence on or before the 30th day of April, 1999 and
     shall continue until the 25th day of May, 2001, and shall be automatically
     renewed on a year to year basis thereafter unless one party hereto
     notifies the other party hereto in writing at least thirty (30) days prior
     to the end of the then current Term that it will not renew this Agreement
     at the end of such then current Term."

2.   Except as amended herein, no further changes are made to the Employment
     Agreement and the same remains in full force and effect.


The viaLink Company                                  Robert I. Noe.


By: /s/ LEWIS B. KILBOURNE                           /s/ ROBERT I. NOE
   -------------------------                         -------------------------
   Lewis B. Kilbourne                                Robert I. Noe

Its: Chief Executive Officer


Date: 3/10/2000                                      Date: 3/14/2000
     -----------------------                              --------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402

Date: January 25, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason 

Parties: Counsel:

USA, 

Plaintiff,

Christine E. Kenney

Richard Lee Hathaway

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN,

COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN

#JTEES42A182076495,

Defendants,

MARIE DALTON, 

Claimant. 

Thomas Edward Goodreid

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 9:25 a.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. 

Discussion regarding the agreement that has been reached with Marie Dalton and the

corresponding asset forfeiture paperwork to be filed.

ORDERED: The asset forfeiture paperwork shall be filed with the court on or before

February 15, 2012.

Hearing Concluded.

Court in recess: 9:29 a.m.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 34 filed 01/25/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Total time in court: 00:04

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at

(303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 34 filed 01/25/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00572

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G.C., JR., C.A.C., H.C., Z.C., AND J.A.C., CHILDREN,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas Trial Court No. 16

- 03

- 55745

- CV Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights. The appellants’ briefs were originally due to be filed on October 28, 2019. On October 28, 2019, the appellants filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file their briefs.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. Id

. The motion is GRANTED, and the appellants’ briefs must be filed no later than November 7, 2019 . Given the ti me constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1245 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1245

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To reform mutual aid agreements for the National Capital Region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFORM OF MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS FOR THE NATIONAL CAPITAL 
              REGION.

    Section 7302 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 
Act of 2004 (42 U.S.C. 5196 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ``, including its 
                agents or authorized volunteers,''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ``or town'' and 
                all that follows and inserting ``town, or other 
                governmental agency, governmental authority, or 
                governmental institution with the power to sue or be 
                sued in its own name, within the National Capital 
                Region.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A), by striking ``, the Washington Metropolitan 
        Area Transit Authority, the Metropolitan Washington Airports 
        Authority, and any other governmental agency or authority''; 
        and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``or employees'' each 
        place that term appears and inserting ``, employees, or 
        agents''.

            Passed the Senate December 12, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1245

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To reform mutual aid agreements for the National Capital Region.
```
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 46 filed 10/17/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Brian B. Obie, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Obie Media Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: July 15, 2004

                                                       By: /s/ Brian B. Obie
                                    President
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

A p p e llan t c o n s e n te dto p r o c e e db e f o r e am a g is tr a te ju d g e . See 2 8 U . S. C. ** § 6 36 (c ). T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E R AJ J AR E AN R A- O- KE L - L Y, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. M I C H A E L J O H N S O N ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35837 D. C . No . 1 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 6 4 5 - MHW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

I daho M i ke lH . W i l l i am s , M a gi s tr a t e Judge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r21, 2011 *** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dT A L L M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e r a jj ar e an R a - o- ke l - l yappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt di s m i s s i ng unde r28 U . S . C . § 1915A hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng vi ol a t i ons 

# FI LED NO V 23 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 35837 2 of hi s c on st i tut i on alri gh t s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew d e n o v o . R es ni ck

v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F. 3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dA p p e llan t’s a c c e s s - to - c o u rts c la im because A pp el l antfa i l ed t o al l ege any fa ct s t o est abl i sh thathe has been hi nd er ed f r o m p u r s u in g an o n f

r iv o lo u s c la im . See L ew is v . Casey , 518 U . S . 343, 352- 53 ( 1 9 9 6 ) ( to s ta te an a c c e s s - to - c o u rts c la im , in m a te m u s t “d e m o n s tr a te th a t a no nfri vo l ou s l egalcl ai m had b ee n frustrat ed or w as bei ng i m peded”). Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rta l s o p r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dA p p e l l an t ’ s r e t a l i a t i o n c l a i ms be c aus e A ppe l l antf

a i l e d t o a l l e ge f

a c t s tha tw oul d e s t abl i s h tha tde f e ndant s t ook a d v e r s e a c tio n a g a in s t h im b e c au s e h e e x e r c is e dh is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts . See R ho des v . R obi ns on , 40 8 F . 3d55 9, 56 7-68 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( el em ent s of are t al i at i on cl ai m ). A p p e llan t’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u np e r s u a s iv e . A p p e llan t’s “M o tio n f

o rRu lin g o n O p e n in g B r ie f ” is d e n ie da s m o o t. AF F I RME D.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 7/25/11 |   |                    |   |
|--------|---------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |    |   |                    |   |
|   |    |   |                    |   |
|   |    |   | /s/ JOHN R. REGAZZI     |   |
|   |    |   | John R. Regazzi         |   |
|   |    |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23647]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES: Submit comments on or before November 6, 2008. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Compensation Agreement; Resolution of Board of Directors, 
and Certificates as to Partners.
    SBA Form Numbers: 159(7a), 159(504), 159D, 160, 160A.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: 7(A) Participants.
    Responses: 27,753.
    Annual Burden: 2,558.

    Title: Statement of Debtor.
    SBA Form Number: 770.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: SBA Borrowers of guarantors who request 
compromise.
    Responses: 5,000.
    Annual Burden: 2,500.

    Title: Servicing Agent Agreement.
    SBA Form Number: 1506.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Certified Development Companies and SBA 
Borrowers.
    Responses: 15,516.
    Annual Burden: 15,516.

    Title: Prime (Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs).
    SBA Form Number: N/A.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    SBA Form Number: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: Disadvantage Microentrepreneurs.
    Responses: 156.
    Annual Burden: 312.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
 [FR Doc. E8-23647 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P