alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                 Estimated volume                Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      ______________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1992......    |          44       7     11       16       10      .232      .038      .058     .079     .049
1993......    |          24       2      4        7       11      .121      .010      .018     .035     .054
1994......    |          10       1      1        3        6      .048      .003      .003     .013     .026
1995......    |          12       0      3        6        4      .055     -.001      .011     .027     .016
1996......    |           7       0      1        2        4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1      0        3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3        0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3        5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3        8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9        5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6        5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |        n.a.       4      6     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .010      .015     n.a.     n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MAURICE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 326 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

I, Wendy A. Nieto certify that:

 

(1)  I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the “registrant”);

 

(2)  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)  The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(i)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(ii)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(iii)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

(5)  The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(i)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(ii)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Dated:                October 13, 2006

 
| /s/   WENDY A. NIETO           |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Wendy A. Nieto                      |
| *Chief Financial Officer and Executive*  |
| *Vice President of Intraware, Inc.* |
| *(Principal Financial Officer)*          |

 

----
| Skip to Content*Release Date: June 10, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.202 U.S. Deposits in Foreign Countries** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502

Date: February 12, 2013 Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller

Parties

JOEL HUGHES,

Plaintiff(s),

Counsel

Timothy D. Edstrom

v.

WESLEY KVASNICKA, Denver Police Officer, and

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,

Jointly and Severally,

Defendant(s).

Joseph M. Rivera

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 2:05 p.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Discussion is held regarding pending motions. 

Plaintiff notes he has not nor will he respond to Defendants’ Motion for Attorney Fees

It is ORDERED: Defendants’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES [Docket No. 52, Filed

December 26, 2013] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record.

Payments of $382.50 and $687.50 shall be made by Plaintiff to

defendant City and County of Denver on or before MARCH 12, 2013.

Statements by both counsel regarding Defendant’s motion for clarification. Findings by the

Court.

It is ORDERED: Defendants’ UNOPPOSED FORTHWITH MOTION SEEKING

CLARIFICATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WATANABE’S DECEMBER

12, 2012 MINUTE ORDER (ECF #50) [Docket No. 59, filed February 07,

2012] is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED: Defendants’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE

PURSUANT TO THE COURT’S MINUTE ORDER (ECF #50) FOR

FILING DISPOSITVE MOTIONS [Docket No. 61, filed February 07, 2013] 

is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. The SCHEDULING 

ORDER [Docket No. 23, filed April 10, 2012] is thus amended.

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 63 Filed 02/12/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DEADLINE is extended to MARCH 11, 2013.

The proposed Final Pretrial Order is reviewed.

It is ORDERED: The proposed FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER which was tendered to the

court, and modified from the bench, is made an order of court.

The parties anticipate a four (4) day trial to a jury.

Hearing concluded.

Court in recess: 2:21 p.m.

Total In-Court Time 00:16 

To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Wood Reports (303) 825-6119 or Toll Free 1-800-962-3345. 

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 63 Filed 02/12/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Guy Cooper and Larney Hall, Respondents.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Coffinas, J.), dated December 5, 1988, which dismissed Kings County indictment No. 8310/88 against the respondents.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the indictment is reinstated against the respondents, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

At issue on appeal is the propriety of an order of the Supreme Court which dismissed the indictment against the defendants, over the objection of the prosecution. The record *894reveals that the dismissal was predicated upon an admission made by the codefendant, during his plea allocution, to the effect that the loaded firearms, which formed the basis of the criminal charges, in fact belonged to him. Although the Supreme Court accepted the codefendant’s guilty plea, it noted, on the record, that it would restore the indictment against the remaining defendants in the event the codefendant attempted to withdraw or otherwise vacate his guilty plea.

We find merit to the People’s contention that the order dismissing the indictment must be reversed. The Supreme Court not only failed to comply with the procedural requirements of providing reasonable notice to the People and setting forth the reasons in support of the dismissal *(see,*CPL 210.45 [1]; *People v Scott,*131 AD2d 893; *People v Baez,*118 AD2d 863) but, in addition, none of the grounds enumerated in CPL 210.20 provided a substantive basis for the dismissal in this case. While we recognize that a trial court has the discretionary authority to dismiss an indictment in the interest of justice *(see, People v Field,*161 AD2d 660; *People v Kelley,*141 AD2d 764; *People v Foster,*127 AD2d 684), the compelling circumstances which might warrant such relief do not exist at bar. The mere fact that the codefendant admitted ownership of the loaded firearms did not, in and of itself, preclude the prosecution of the remaining defendants, who were charged under an acting in concert theory and who were also subject to the statutory presumption contained in Penal Law § 265.15 *(see, People v Hutchenson,*136 AD2d 737, 738-739). Accordingly, the order dismissing the charges must be reversed and the indictment against the defendants Hall and Cooper reinstated. Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


MARCH 24, 2006                           /S/ HAIM TSUFF
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         HAIM TSUFF
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                         (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING
                                         OFFICER)


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the annual report of Photonic Products Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph J. Rutherford,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
  Dated:  March
      31, 2010
                
                /s/ Joseph J.
      RutherfordJoseph
      J. RutherfordChief
      Executive Officer
  This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Sections 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-1999-D-0128] (formerly Docket No. 1999D-2013)

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry: Cooperative Manufacturing Arrangements for Licensed Biologics” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 19, 2007 (72 FR 65034), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0629. The approval expires on September 30, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: September 29, 2008.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E8-23907 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
**Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**
 **(Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 Calypso
Wireless, Inc.
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
Schilling, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Calypso Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by Calypso Wireless, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 Dated:
May 5, 2005
 By:/s/
      George Schilling
      George
      Schilling
      President
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**
 **(Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 *
 Calypso
Wireless, Inc.
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John W.
Stump, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Calypso Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by Calypso Wireless, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 Dated:
May 5, 2005
 
 By:/s/
      John W. Stump, III
      John
      W. Stump, IIIChief
      Financial Officer
 ****
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2024-0609

LT Case No. 2013-102539-CFDL 

_____________________________ 

JOSHUA I. MARTINEZ, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. 

Randell H. Rowe, III, Judge. 

Joshua I. Martinez, Mayo, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell 

Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, SOUD, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002, SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

As
an accompaniment to the Annual Report of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

This
certification is based on inquiries that I have made, or have caused to be made, in a good faith effort on my part to be a responsible and competent chief executive officer serving
the Company and its many constituencies.

This
certification merely accompanies and is not part of the Report, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and may not be used for any purpose
other than compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date:
March 10, 2011

/s/
James M. Anderson
[Signature]

Senior
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
[Title]

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Factory Card and Party Outlet
Naperville, Illinois:


     We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Factory Card and Party Outlet Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 3, 2002,
and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for
the three month and four month periods ended August 3, 2002, and the two month
period ended April 6, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Factory Card & Party Outlet Corporation's management.

     We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

     Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 16, 2002