alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter E. Takiff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Peter E. Takiff
--------------------------
Peter E. Takiff
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003
#### MATTHEW J. SAVAGE BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, JOSEPHINE ALEXANDER, RESPONDENT, v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, PROSECUTOR.

Submitted October 7. 1947

Decided January 19, 1948.

Before Justices Donges, Colie and Eastwood.

For the prosecutor, *Gerald T. Foley.*

Fox the respondent, *O’Brien, Brett*& *O’Brien (Thomas J. Brett,*of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

Matthew J. Savage sustained a punctured eardrum as a result of the improper use of a compressed air hose by a fellow employee. He filed a petition in the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau and was awarded compensation for permanent injuries sustained by him. The learned Deputy Commissioner who heard the case found as a fact “that the air hose on petitioner’s machine was played on petitioner’s face on the day in question * * * in a spirit of horseplay.” On appeal, the Court of Common Pleas entered judgment awarding compensation for permanent disability. The opinion of the latter court stated the question at issue as follows: “Does the air-gun have so close a relation to the working milieu that injury resulting from its intentional misuse, so easy of occurrence and so vividly within the employer’s apprehension, can be said to have arisen out of and in the course of tlie employment? We think it does.”

We do not agree with the learned Common Pleas Judge and believe that he fell into error. If the “working milieu” *420is to be the test, then the butcher’s assistant playfully tapped on the head by a cleaver or cut by a sharp knife in an otherwise harmless burst of horseplay by a fellow employee has sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of the employment.

In *Budrevie*v. *Wright Aeronautical Corp.,*135 *N. J. L.*46, Mr. Justices Donges quoted with approval the rule as laid down in *Hulley*v. *Moosbrugger,*88 *Id.*161, “that an employer is not liable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to make, compensation for injury to an employee which was the result of horse-play or sky-larking, * * * for, while an accident, happening in such circumstances, may arise in the course of, it cannot be said to arise out of, the employment.” The *Budrevie*case was affirmed by the Court of Errors and Appeals, 136 *N. J. L.*198, and is dispositive of the present case.

The judgment below is reversed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DURWOOD, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,891
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,891
<PP&E>                                           4,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,104
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,061
<SALES>                                          3,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,280
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,407)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,407)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 Board of
Directors
 Giga-tronics
Incorporated
 San
Ramon, California
 
 
 
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-45476, 333-34719, 333-48889, 333-39403, 333-69688 and 333-135578) on Form
S-8 of Giga-tronics Incorporated of our report dated June 10, 2008, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of Giga-tronics Incorporated and subsidiaries as
of March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in
the period ended March 29, 2008, then ended, which report appears elsewhere in
this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 Perry-Smith
LLP
 
 
 San
Francisco, California
 June 10,
2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02430–WYD–KMT

LUCAS DEMAESTRI,

Plaintiff,

v. 

VERIFACTS INC., 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff’s “Amended Complaint for Violations of the FCRA and FDCPA” (Doc. No. 21, filed

Jan. 10, 2012) is STRICKEN. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1) provides that a party

may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within either 21 days after serving it, or 21

days after service of a responsive pleading or a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f). Otherwise, a

party may amend its pleading only with the opposing parties’ written consent or the court’s

leave. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(2). 

Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed on September 15, 2011 (Doc. No. 1) and Defendant’s Answer

was filed on October 24, 2011 (Doc. No. 9). Thus, the deadline for Plaintiff to amend his

complaint as a matter of course has passed. Plaintiff must either seek the court’s leave or the

written consent of Defendant prior to filing his amended complaint. 

Dated: January 11, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02430-WYD-KMT Document 22 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01973-PAB-KMT Document 2 Filed 07/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1265 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for veterans’ 

mortgage life insurance to include members of the Armed Forces receiving specially adapted housing assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2007 

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for veterans’ mortgage life insurance to include members 

of the Armed Forces receiving specially adapted housing 

assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 1265 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VETERANS’ 

2 MORTGAGE LIFE INSURANCE TO INCLUDE 

3 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES RECEIV4 ING SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING ASSIST5 ANCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF VET6 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

7 Section 2106 of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘veteran’’ each place it appears 

10 and inserting ‘‘veteran or member of the Armed 

11 Forces’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘veterans’ 

13 election’’ and inserting ‘‘election of the veteran or 

14 member of the Armed Forces’’; 

15 (3) in subsection (f), by inserting ‘‘, members 

16 of the Armed Forces,’’ after ‘‘veterans’’; and 

17 (4) in subsection (i)— 

18 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘vet19 eran’s indebtedness’’ and inserting ‘‘indebted20 ness of the veteran or member of the Armed 

21 Forces’’; and 

22 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘vet23 eran’s ownership’’ and inserting ‘‘ownership of 

24 the veteran or member of the Armed Forces’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

 

**Independent Auditors’Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors

PerfectData Corporation:

 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference inthe registration statement (No. 333-51774) on Form S-8 of PerfectDataCorporation of our report dated May 10, 2002, with respect to the balance sheetof PerfectData Corporation as of March 31, 2002, and the related statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cashflows for each of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2002, whichreport appears in the March 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-KSB ofPerfectData Corporation.

 

KPMG LLP

 

 

Los Angeles, California

June 20, 2002

 

 

E-2

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00376-WJM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. EXECUTIVE RECYCLING, INC.,

2. BRANDON RICHTER, and

3. TOR OLSON,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion for a Protective Order

(ECF No. 163) pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1) covering the shipper export

declarations (SEDs) bates stamped 00008513 to 00009664. The Court having

considered this motion and for good cause shown it hereby ORDERS as follows:

The Government’s Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Specifically the Court

ORDERS that the SEDs previously provided by governed by the following conditions:

1. Defense counsel shall keep the SEDs and any notes or other materials prepared

based upon or referring to information in the SEDs in strict confidence. Defense

counsel shall use them exclusively in connection with this case (including trial

preparation, motions practice, trial, and appeals or other related legal

proceedings) and for no other purpose.

2. The SEDs may be viewed only by defense counsel and such members of their

staff as are necessary for the purposes outlined above and, as it pertains to staff,

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 164 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

only while necessary staff are operating under the direct supervision and control

of defense counsel. Defense counsel shall ensure that all persons in their offices

who are to handle such information read this Order and are informed of their

responsibility to safeguard this information. The SEDs may also be shared with

defense experts and investigators but again, such experts and investigators must

read this Order and be informed of their responsibility to safeguard this

information.

3. Defense counsel shall make only such copies as are necessary to prepare a

defense of this criminal case. Defense counsel will maintain a log of any copies

distributed to experts or investigators, and will include a copy of this Order along

with any such copies. 

4. Defense counsel shall provide the Defendants with reasonable access to the

SEDs, and ensure that the Defendants do not retain any copies of the SEDs, or

any notes made by Defendants or others in connection with the SEDs.

5. At the conclusion of the case, including any appeals, by entry of the Court's

judgment, defense counsel within ten days shall collect any copies provided to

experts or investigators and return them to the Government.

Dated this 24th day of October, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

__________________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00376-WJM Document 164 Filed 10/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-52722 and No. 33-92818 of Tomkins plc on Form
S-8 of our report dated February 26, 2004, except for Note 26, as to which the date is May 18, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the differences between accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and the effect that the application of the latter would have on the determination of net income and shareholders’ equity), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Tomkins plc and its
subsidiaries for the year ended January 3, 2004. 
  

	
	
	/s/     DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP        
	

	 Deloitte & Touche LLP
 London, England


  
 May 18, 2004
Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 8 Filed 08/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 8 Filed 08/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Avtar Dhillon, MD, certify that:

 

1             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Emerald Health Therapeutic, Inc.;

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.            Theissuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)          [omitted];

 

(c)          Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(d)          Disclosedin this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.            Theissuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b)          Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
         33-61977 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, Registration Statement
         33-61979 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, Registration Statement
         33-12571 on Form S-8 dated March 11, 1987 and Registration Statement
         33-593 on Form S-8 dated October 1, 1985, of our report dated March 19,
         2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets as of December
         31, 2002 and 2001 and the consolidated statements of operations,
         stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in
         the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the financial
         statement schedule for each of the respective periods, of Integral
         Vision, Inc. and subsidiary (formerly Medar, Inc. and subsidiaries)
         included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
         31, 2002.



         /S/ Moore Stephens Doeren Mayhew

         Troy, Michigan
         March 29, 2003




                                       65
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1249 

To require the President to close the Department of Defense detention facility 

at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the President to close the Department of Defense 

detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIRED CLOSURE OF GUANTANAMO BAY DE4 TENTION FACILITY. 

5 (a) CLOSURE OF DETENTION FACILITY.—Not later 

6 than one year after the date of the enactment of this 

7 Act— 

8 (1) the President shall close the Department of 

9 Defense detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, 

10 Cuba; and 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1249 IS

1 (2) all detainees detained at such facility shall 

2 be removed from the facility and— 

3 (A) transferred to a military or civilian de4 tention facility in the United States and 

5 charged with a violation of United States or 

6 international law and tried in an Article III 

7 court or military legal proceeding before a regu8 larly-constituted court; 

9 (B) transferred to a military or civilian de10 tention facility in the United States without 

11 being charged with a violation of law if the de12 tainee may be held as an enemy combatant or 

13 detained pursuant to other legal authority as 

14 Congress may authorize; 

15 (C) transferred to an international tribunal 

16 operating under the authority of the United 

17 Nations with jurisdiction to hold trials of such 

18 individuals; 

19 (D) transferred to their country of citizen20 ship or a different country for further legal 

21 process, provided that such country provides 

22 adequate assurances that the individual will not 

23 be subject to torture or cruel, inhuman, or de24 grading treatment; or 

25 (E) released from any further detention. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 1249 IS

1 (b) IMMIGRATION STATUS.—The transfer of an indi2 vidual under subsection (a) shall not be considered an 

3 entry into the United States for purposes of immigration 

4 status. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
**Exhibit 21**

**SHUFFLEMASTER, INC.SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

| Name of Subsidiary                                                  | ** ** | ** **   | ** ** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------|------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| Shuffle Master  International, Inc.                            |       | Nevada       |
| Shuffle Master Australia Pty  Ltd                                   |       | Australia    |
| Gaming Products Pty Ltd                                             |       | Australia    |
| VIP Gaming Solutions Pty  Limited                                   |       | Australia    |
| Shuffle Master Australasia  Holdings Pty Ltd                        |       | Australia    |
| Shuffle Master Australasia  Pty Ltd                                 |       | Australia    |
| Shuffle Master Holding GMBH                                         |       | Austria      |
| Shuffle Master  Management-Services GMBH                            |       | Austria      |
| Shuffle Master GMBH                                                 |       | Austria      |
| Shuffle Master Holding  GMBH & Co Financing Consulting-KEG |       | Austria      |
| Shuffle Master  GMBH & Co KG (dba CARD)                    |       | Austria      |
| Shuffle Up Productions                                              |       | Delaware     |
| CARD Casinos Austria  Research and Development Limited              |       | New  Zealand |
| CARD-Australasia Limited                                            |       | Macau        |
| Stargames Pty Ltd  (subsidiaries listed below)                      |       | Australia    |
| CARD Shuffle Master Investments (Proprietary)  Limited              |       | South Africa |

 

**Stargames Pty Ltd Subsidiaries**

| Name of Subsidiary                          | ** ** | ** **  | ** ** | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------|------------|-------------|------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|
| Stargames Group  Management Pty Limited     |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Holdings Pty  Limited             |       | Australia   |
| Professional Vending  Services Pty Limited  |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Australia Pty  Limited            |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Investments Pty  Limited          |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Corporation Pty  Limited          |       | Australia   |
| Precise Craft Pty Limited                   |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Property Pty  Limited             |       | Australia   |
| Australasian Gaming  Industries Pty Limited |       | Australia   |
| Advem Pty Limited                           |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Assets Pty Limited                |       | Australia   |
| Stargames Corporation (NZ) Pty Limited      |       | New Zealand |

 

 

----