alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

*****************************SEALED CASE *******************************

Case Number 11-SW-05439-MJW

IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF:

513 Shady Crest Circle

Colorado Springs CO 80918

ORDER

(DN 7)

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Letter captioned “Affidavit - Request for

Information” (docket no. 7) filed by Requesters George Thomas Brokaw, John Joseph

Pawelski and Mimi Michelle Vigil is STRICKEN for the following reasons. The Letter is

an ex parte communication with the court which is prohibited under D.C.COLO.LCivR

77.2 and not authorized under D.C.COLO.LCrR 17.2. If Requesters George Thomas

Brokaw, John Joseph Pawelski and Mimi Michelle Vigil seek relief from this court, then

each Requester shall file, with the court, a written motion with legal authority cited

therein and shall serve of copy of such motion upon the United States Attorney for the

District of Colorado. Lastly, there is no Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure, no Local

Rule of Practice, no Constitutional authority and no case law that allows a Requester to

seek answers to interrogatories [written questions] from a judicial officer. A judicial

officer is defined under D.C.COLO.LCrR 1.1 F. Judicial Officer. A judicial officer refers

to a district judge or to a magistrate judge. 

SIGNED AND DATED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael J. Watanabe 

MICHAEL J. WATANABE

US Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-sw-05439-MJW Document 8 Filed 09/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
"Date","Total","Federal","Nonfederal Total","Nonfederal Households","Nonfederal Business","Nonfederal State and local govts"
"1994",4.6,4.7,4.6,7.6,3.8,-4.0
"1995",5.3,4.1,5.7,7.1,7.2,-5.5
"1996",5.2,4.0,5.7,6.8,6.2,-1.5
"1997",5.3,0.6,7.0,6.0,9.0,4.0
"1998",6.9,-1.4,9.6,7.9,12.3,6.3
"","","","","","",""
"1999",6.3,-1.9,8.8,8.1,10.6,3.4
"2000",4.9,-8.0,8.4,8.7,9.4,1.3
"2001",6.2,-0.2,7.7,9.0,6.1,8.9
"2002",6.9,7.6,6.7,9.6,2.8,11.1
"2003",8.1,10.9,7.5,10.2,4.3,8.2
"","","","","","",""
"2003Q1",7.4,5.1,7.9,11.3,4.0,6.9
"2003Q2",11.0,19.6,9.1,11.6,5.7,11.3
"2003Q3",7.0,8.2,6.8,9.5,3.3,7.2
"2003Q4",6.3,9.1,5.7,7.0,3.8,6.3
"","","","","","",""
"2004Q1",9.1,12.0,8.5,11.3,4.8,9.5
"2004Q2",7.7,10.7,7.0,9.5,4.4,4.6
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 18, 2006



/s/ Ronald F. KlawitterRonald F. KlawitterExecutive Vice President of Administration,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, T exas** 

January 10, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00729

- CR

James Joshua GRIFFIN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR11589 Honorable Jennifer Pena , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due November 7, 2022

. On November 8, 2022, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension until March 8, 2023 to file the record. On November 10 , 20 22 , we granted the court reporter’s request in part and ordered the reporter’s record due by Janu ary 6 , 202 3 . On that day, the court reporter filed a second notification of late record requesting an extension until February 5 , 202 3 . After consideration, we GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record due by February 5, 202 3

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of January, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02483-RPM

BENJAMIN VALDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

APOLLO GROUP, INC., an Arizona corporation,

INSIGHT SCHOOLS, INC., an Oregon corporation

d/b/a Insight School of Colorado and Insight School Colorado at Julesburg,

now a subsidiary of Iowa College Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation,

in turn a subsidiary of Kaplan Higher Education Corporation, a Delaware corporation,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

____________________________________________________________________________

Upon review of Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint [13] filed November

18, 2011, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the amended complaint attached thereto is

accepted for filing.

DATED: November 21st, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02483-RPM Document 14 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending February 20, 2021

---





## Monetary and Financial Policy

|
|

## Regulations and Policies

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Cheryl L. Dotson, CFO of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Cheryl L. DotsonCheryl L. Dotson, CFODated: June 22, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Calypso Wireless, Inc. and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1099

AN ACT

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to 

make individuals employed by the Roosevelt Campobello 

International Park Commission eligible to obtain Federal 

health insurance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1099 ES

1 SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE. 

2 Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

3 amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

7 after the semicolon; and 

8 (3) by inserting before the matter following 

9 subparagraph (I) the following: 

10 ‘‘(J) an individual who is employed by the 

11 Roosevelt Campobello International Park Com12 mission and is a citizen of the United States,’’. 

Passed the Senate June 22, 2007. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1099

AN ACT

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States 

sion eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.sevelt Campobello International Park CommisCode, to make individuals employed by the Roo-
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58717-58718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of 
the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, November 25, 2008, from 9 
a.m. Pacific Time to 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference 
call. If

[[Page 58718]]

you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please 
call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, TAP 
Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the 
telephone conference call meeting must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. 
Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or you can 
contact us at http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: September 26, 2008.
Roy L. Block,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E8-23659 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001024339
<NAME>                        CREDIT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,253,187
<SECURITIES>                                 2,316,957
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,794,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (311,583)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,520,116
<PP&E>                                       9,482,639
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,362,436)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,985,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,180,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,169
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,622,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,985,578
<SALES>                                         49,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,197,413
<CGS>                                           84,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,792,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,921,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (475,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (475,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (475,797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50914

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

J Reyes-Carrillo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-312-1

______________________________

Before Stewart, Dennis, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

J Reyes-Carrillo appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). He 

argues that the recidivism enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional 

because it permits a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory 

maximum established by § 1326(a), based on facts that are neither alleged in 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 31, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50914 Document: 00516697275 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2023
No. 22-50914

2

the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Reyes-Carrillo

acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United 

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve it for possible Supreme 

Court review. Accordingly, he has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

disposition. 

We have held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions such as 

Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. 

Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Reyes-Carrillo is, therefore, 

correct that his argument is foreclosed. Because his position “is clearly right 

as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the 

outcome of the case,” summary disposition is proper. Groendyke Transp., 

Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, Reyes-Carrillo’s motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-50914 Document: 00516697275 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2023
#### David Redfern et al., Respondents, v 1552-75-82 President Street Realty Corp., Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 450]

In an *392action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 17, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The infant plaintiff allegedly was injured when the glass plate cover from the light fixture on his bedroom ceiling fell on his head. The defendant landlord moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the Supreme Court denied the motion.

The Supreme Court erred in determining that there was a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant may be liable under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, as the plaintiff failed to establish that the light fixture was in the defendant’s exclusive control *(see Kambat v St. Francis Hosp.,*89 NY2d 489).

However, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, since the plaintiffs’ deposition transcripts, submitted by the defendant in support of the motion, raised an issue of fact as to whether the building superintendent created the allegedly defective condition by removing and replacing the light fixture prior to the date of the accident *(see generally*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320). Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00364-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. RAMON ACOSTA-BALLESTEROS, 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

Due to a scheduling conflict with the Court’s calendar, the Change of Plea hearing 

set for Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. is VACATED and RESET for 

Monday, January 3, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. 

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents 

separately to Judge Daniel’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later 

than 72 HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted, 

the hearing will be VACATED. There will be no exceptions to this policy, and 

sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply.

 Dated: December 14, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 325-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 325-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 325-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 325-1 filed 08/19/13 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**EXHIBIT 21—SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **Name**                         | ** ** | **State of Incorporation** |
|----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                             |       |                       |
| MainSource Bank                  |       | Indiana                    |
| MainSource Bank of  Illinois     |       | Illinois                   |
| IUB Reinsurance Co.,  Ltd.       |       | Turks and Caicos           |
| MainSource Insurance,  LLC       |       | Indiana                    |
| MSB Investments of Nevada,  Inc. |       | Nevada                     |
| MSB Holdings of  Nevada, Inc.    |       | Nevada                     |
| MSB of Nevada, LLC               |       | Nevada                     |
| MainSource Statutory  Trust I    |       | Connecticut                |
| MainSource Statutory  Trust II   |       | Connecticut                |
| MainSource Statutory  Trust III  |       | Delaware                   |
| MSB Realty, Inc.                 |       | Maryland                   |
| MainSource Title, LLC            |       | Indiana                    |
| MainSource Mortgage,  LLC        |       | Indiana                    |

 

----
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedMarch 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.
| Date: June 14, 2007 |                      |
|---------------------|---------------------------|
|                | /s/ Christopher A. Twomey |   |
|                |                      | Christopher A.  Twomey, |
|                |                      | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                     |                           |  |  |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7938

DAVID S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JON GALLEY, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-3012-1-WMN) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David S. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Michael O’Connor Doyle, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David S. Johnson, a Maryland prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02467-DME-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502

Date: January 30, 2012 Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller

Parties

CARLO LOMBARDI,

Plaintiff(s),

Counsel

David J. Furtado 

v.

ADVANTAGE LOGISTICS USA WEST, LLC,

Defendant(s).

- - - - - 

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 9:05 a.m.

Court calls case. Telephonic appearance of Plaintiff’s counsel. 

Status of the case is discussed.

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT [Docket No. 11, filed

January 24, 2012] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record.

It is ORDERED: The AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND [Docket No. 12] is

accepted for filing as of this date, January 30, 2012.

The caption is amended accordingly and all future filings shall reflect the

new caption.

It is ORDERED: A RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING/ PLANNING CONFERENCE is set

MARCH 23, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-502, Fifth floor,

Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,

Colorado 80294.

Parties shall file their join proposed SCHEDULING ORDER 

on or before MARCH 19, 2012.

Plaintiff shall include, with service to the correct defendant, a copy of the original Order Setting

Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 3, filed October 25, 2011], and Notice of the Scheduling

Conference set March 23, 2012.

HEARING CONCLUDES. Court in recess: 9:16 a.m. Total In-Court Time: 00:11

Case 1:11-cv-02467-DME-MJW Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### CHALLAND v. CHALLAND.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June Term 1953.

Dismissed without opinion.
Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 95 Filed 05/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1