alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Rivera, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 728]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 27, 2000 *(People v Rivera,*277 AD2d 470), affirming two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 28, 1996, and April 30, 1996, respectively.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Goldstein, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23229]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 16 October 2008, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address, or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 25 September, 2008.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23229 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00362-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. DALE JOHNSON, 

2. DONALD BEVERLY, 

3. RONALD BENJAMIN, 

4. JIMMY HUTCHINSON, 

5. VINCENT JACKSON, 

6. JERROLD MINNEY, and 

7. SCOTT GOLDBERG, 

Defendants. 

ORDER 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Government's Motion to Disclose 

Grand Jury Material pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(I). Having reviewed the 

motion and being otherwise advised in the premises, the Court finds that good and 

sufficient cause supports the same. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Disclose Grand Jury Material, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(I) (ECF Doc. #29), filed November 2, 2011, is 

GRANTED. The Grand Jury testimony and Grand Jury exhibits may be disclosed to 

the Defendants and the Defendants= attorneys in the course of discovery in this case. 

It is 
2 

FURTHER ORDERED that such materials shall only be used in defending this 

case; that such materials shall be disclosed only to the Defendants and counsel for the 

Defendants, that the Defendants= attorneys shall maintain custody of such materials, 

and shall not reproduce or disseminate the same; and that such materials shall be 

returned to the United States at the end of the case. 

Dated: November 9, 2011. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL, 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Institutional Properties/2 1998 Year-End 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000719184
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         62,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,367
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,547
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.28<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.01


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-83590) of Meridian National Corporation and in the related
prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-72256 and
333-961) pertaining to the 1990 Non-qualified and Incentive Stock Option Plan
and the Amended and Restated 1987 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of
Meridian National Corporation of our report dated November 18, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Meridian National
Corporation included in this annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
February 28, 1998.



                                                        REHMANN ROBSON, P.C.


Farmington Hills, Michigan
June 18, 1999
exv4w2



 











Exhibit 4.2




Amendment to the Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.

Employees’ Stock Option Plan

(effective March 24, 2004)




     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Philadelphia Consolidated
Holding Corp., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”) has determined to
amend certain provisions of the Philadelphia Consolidated Holding Corp.
Employees’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) in order to increase the number of
shares available for the grant of options under the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Board is authorized to amend the Plan, at its discretion,
from time to time pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of March 24,
2004, and subject to approval of such amendment by the Company’s shareholders,
as follows:



     1. The first paragraph of Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended to read,
in its entirety as follows:




     “4. Stock Subject to Options. Subject to
adjustment in accordance with paragraph 12, options to
purchase a total of 5,500,000 shares of Common Stock
(taking into account options previously granted under
this Plan prior to this amendment and restatement) are
authorized for issuance under this Plan. If, and to
the extent that, stock options granted under this Plan
(“Options”) terminate or expire without the Options
being exercised, new options may be granted with
respect to the shares covered by such terminated or
expired Options provided that the granting and terms
of such new Options shall in all respects comply with
the provision of this Plan.”



     2. In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-005-01-JD

Lloyd J. Coleman

O R D E R

On March 28, 2006, defendant appeared for a “probable cause”

hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on three alleged violations

of conditions of supervision. Defendant waived the preliminary

hearing to determine probable cause on the violations. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community. Here

the immediacy and violence of the violations convince me that

without the presence of a third party custodian he is a danger to

the community. There are no conditions presently which are

likely to assure his the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

Case 1:05-cr-00005-JD Document 23 Filed 03/29/06 Page 1 of 2
2

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 29, 2006

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

 William E. Morse, AUSA

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:05-cr-00005-JD Document 23 Filed 03/29/06 Page 2 of 2
1 “[#70]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-01989-REB-KMT

AZEB KALEWOLD,

Plaintiff,

v.

HSS, INC. (Aviation and Government Services Division),

WAYNE V. SCHELL, as President, and

TRI-STAR RISK MANAGEMENT,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before the court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant

To FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A) [#70]1 filed August 22, 2012. After reviewing the

stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that

this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant To FED. R. CIV. P.

41(a)(1)(A) [#70] filed August 22, 2012, is APPROVED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for September 28, 2012, is

VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence October 22, 2012, is VACATED; and

Case 1:11-cv-01989-REB-KMT Document 71 Filed 08/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay

their own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated August 22, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-01989-REB-KMT Document 71 Filed 08/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





MARCH
12,
2010





/s/ HAIM
TSUFF


HAIM
TSUFF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER)








A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ISRAMCO,
INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Inland Resources Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-41662), Form S-8 (File No. 33-
84640), Form S-3 (File No. 33-84766) and Form S-3 (File No. 33-80392) of our
report dated March 20, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Inland Resource Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and for the year then
ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand LLP
Coopers & Lybrand LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 24, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 08-cv-442-JL

NH State Prison, Warden et al

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $13.00 is due no later than

November 28, 2008. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

New Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 29, 2008

cc: Randolph L. Chambers

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00442-JL Document 5 Filed 10/29/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58592-58593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 31, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:

[[Page 58593]]

    1. Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Merrill Lynch Bank & Trust 
Co., FSB, New York, New York, and thereby indirectly acquire Merrill 
Lynch Bank USA, Salt Lake City, Utah, and thereby engage in operating a 
savings association and an industrial bank, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 2, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-23644 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sujit Sircar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    SUJIT
SIRCAR    
|Sujit Sircar           
|Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 28, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00346-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ENRIQUE LOPEZ-CORONA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on September 29, 2011 [Docket No. 13]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 3, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 3, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. is VACATED.

DATED September 30, 2011.

Case 1:11-cr-00346-PAB Document 14 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action: 11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Date: November 26, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties: Counsel:

LAURA S. RODGERS,

Plaintiff,

Aimee Hall Wagstaff

v.

TIMECENTRE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Christopher Shawn Jones

William Sidney Finger

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY/MOTION HEARING

Court in Session: 3:48 p.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

The court addresses the parties regarding the plaintiff’s MOTION for Entry of Default as to

TimeCentre, Inc. (Docket No. 93, filed on 11/9/2012), the defendant’s Unopposed MOTION to

Withdraw as Local County (Docket No. 99, filed on 11/19/2012), and the defendant’s MOTION for

Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Docket No. 101, filed on 11/21/2012).

Discussion between the court and the parties regarding their pending motions, discovery disputes,

Rule 12, the plaintiff possibly filing a motion to seek leave to amend, and Rule 15(a). 

ORDERED: The court GRANTS the defendant’s Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Local

County [sic] (Docket No. 99, filed on 11/19/2012).

The court advises the parties that it shall wait until the remaining motions are fully briefed before

entering a ruling on them.

Further discussion regarding the remaining discovery the parties need, Rule 16, the upcoming Final

Case 1:11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS Document 106 Filed 11/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Pretrial Conference (currently set for November 28, 2012 at 4:00 p.m.) before Judge Krieger,

possible trial date, length of trial, the plaintiff possibly filing a motion for default judgment, and how

to best get this case moved forward to trial.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 4:43 p.m.

Total time in court: 00:55

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)

825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case 1:11-cv-02103-MSK-CBS Document 106 Filed 11/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### M. Schottenfeld & Sons, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Bessie M. Kasabali, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 25, 1956.

*563*Julius Haimowitz*for appellant.

*Henry E. Coleman*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Under all the circumstances here, the refusal to grant plaintiff’s application to reopen the case for the purpose of taking testimony of a witness was prejudicial error. The trial court had been notified of the departure of this witness from his place of business and of his expected arrival, and when he appeared during summation of counsel, he should have been permitted to testify. *(Sirico*v. *Four Wheels,*51 N. Y. S. 2d 425; *Oka*v. *United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.,*213 App. Div. 746.)

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion for a new trial granted.

Edeb, Heoht and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission 

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, October 3, 2008. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Staff Assistant. 

 [FR Doc. E8-23421 Filed 9-30-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P