alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.04

                          WEST TELESERVICES CORPORATION

To:    Mike Sturgeon

From:  Tom Barker

Date:  December 8, 1999

Re:    2000 Compensation Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The compensation plan for 2000 while you are employed as Executive Vice-
President of Sales and Marketing for West TeleServices Corporation is outlined
below:

1.   Your base salary will be $190,000.00. Should you elect to voluntarily
     terminate your employment, you will be compensated for your services
     through the date of your actual termination per your Employment Agreement.
     This will be reviewed on an annual basis and revised, if necessary in
     accordance with the consumer price index.

2.   You will be eligible to receive a monthly performance bonus based on 2000
     revenue growth.  This monthly bonus will be calculated by multiplying year-
     to-date revenue growth times the incentive factors indicated below.  A
     negative calculation at the end of any given month will result in a loss
     carry forward to be applied to the next monthly bonus calculation.  All
     bonuses will be paid within 30 days of the end of the month.

          1999 Revenue Growth    Compensation Rate Factor
          -------------------    ------------------------
          0 - $100 million                   .002
          $100 million +                     .0045


3.   You will be eligible to receive an additional one-time bonus of $50,000.00
     if WTSC consolidated revenue for 2000 is at least $675 million.  Revenue
     derived from acquisitions or marketing services related programs will not
     be considered when calculating revenue for this bonus.  If earned, this
     bonus will be paid within thirty (30) days after 12/31/2000 financials are
     prepared, but no later than 02/26/2001.

                    /s/ Mike Sturgeon
                    ------------------------
                    Employee - Mike Sturgeon
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. (No.33-45395) of our reports, dated March 6, 2007, on the consolidated financialstatements of MainSource Financial Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and with respect to MainSource Financial Group, Inc. management'sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2006, which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofMainSource Financial Group, Inc.  

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                    CroweChizek and Company LLC

 

Louisville, Kentucky

March 9, 2007

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2094

ANTHONY G. BRYANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (2:20-cv-03037-MBS-MGB)

Submitted: January 19, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2021

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony G. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order requiring him to pay 

the full filing fee in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

The order Bryant seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23

                                                         Page 178 of 181<PAGE>










INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, No. 333-41077 of Burlington Coat
Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report 
dated July 28, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the 
eleven months in the period ended May 30, 1998. 




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

August 25, 1998



                                                          Page 179 of 181<PAGE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1065 

CA 12-00488 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN 

NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY (“NYCM”), PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

 

AND ORDER

JASMINE MENDEZ, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

BROWN & KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (MARK J. SCHAEFER OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES MORRIS, BUFFALO (NADEEN C. SINGH OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick

J. Marshall, J.), entered August 19, 2011. The order, insofar as

appealed from, denied the application of petitioner for a permanent

stay of arbitration and denied the application of petitioner for an

evidentiary hearing. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing appeal

signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 7, 2012, 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

Key Tronic Corporation

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Key Tronic Corporation
as of June 27, 1998 and June 28, 1997, and for each of the three years in the
period ended June 27, 1998 and have issued our report thereon dated August 10,
1998;  such report is included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits also
included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Key Tronic
Corporation, listed in Item 14(A).  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such consolidated financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects
the information set forth therein.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
August 10, 1998
Case 1:11-cv-02269-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02269-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02269-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1327 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1327

   To create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2007

 Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hagel, Mr. 
Inouye, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Brown, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, 
  Mrs. Boxer, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY JUDGESHIPS FOR DISTRICT COURTS.

    (a) Additional Temporary Judgeships.--
            (1) In general.--The President shall appoint, by and with 
        the advice and consent of the Senate--
                    (A) 1 additional district judge for the eastern 
                district of California; and
                    (B) 1 additional district judge for the district of 
                Nebraska.
            (2) Vacancies not filled.--The first vacancy in the office 
        of district judge in each of the offices of district judge 
        authorized by this subsection, occurring 10 years or more after 
        the confirmation date of the judge named to fill the temporary 
        district judgeship created in the applicable district by this 
        subsection, shall not be filled.
    (b) Extension of Certain Temporary Judgeships.--Section 203(c) of 
the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-650; 28 U.S.C. 
133 note) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence, by inserting ``the district of 
        Hawaii,'' after ``Pennsylvania,'';
            (2) in the third sentence (relating to the district of 
        Kansas), by striking ``16 years'' and inserting ``26 years'';
            (3) in the fifth sentence (relating to the northern 
        district of Ohio), by striking ``15 years'' and inserting ``25 
        years''; and
            (4) by inserting ``The first vacancy in the office of 
        district judge in the district of Hawaii occurring 20 years or 
        more after the confirmation date of the judge named to fill the 
        temporary judgeship created under this subsection shall not be 
        filled.'' after the sixth sentence.
                                 <all>
```
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1347 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1347


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2007

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as of 
  which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 
 deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 
                        activities on the land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act (Public Law 106-
568; 114 Stat. 2919) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``Notwithstanding'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Acceptance of Land.--Notwithstanding'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The Secretary'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Declaration.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class II Gaming.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), 
        notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Lytton 
        Rancheria of California may conduct activities for class II 
        gaming (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) on the land taken into trust under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Requirement.--The Lytton Rancheria of California 
        shall not expand the exterior physical measurements of any 
        facility on the Lytton Rancheria in use for class II gaming 
        activities on the date of enactment of this paragraph.
    ``(d) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class III Gaming.--
Notwithstanding subsection (a), for purposes of class III gaming (as 
defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2703)), the land taken into trust under this section shall be treated, 
for purposes of section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 
U.S.C. 2719), as if the land was acquired on October 9, 2003, the date 
on which the Secretary took the land into trust.''.

            Passed the Senate November 5, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
#### The Cambridge Collieries Co. *v.*Swanda.

(No. 24921

Decided May 29, 1935.)

*Mr. Bobert E. Scott,*for plaintiff in error.

' *Mr. P. W. Tetlow*and *Mr. W. C. Hurrel,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that of the Court of *669Common Pleas affirmed on authority of *Noggle*v. *Industrial Commission, ante,*495, 196 N. E., 377.

*Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.*

Weygandt, C.J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2025 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2025

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all individuals a 
deduction for Federal, State, and local highway motor fuel sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2001

 Mr. Manzullo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all individuals a 
deduction for Federal, State, and local highway motor fuel sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gasoline Price Relief Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL HIGHWAY MOTOR FUEL 
              SALES TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 164 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to taxes) is amended by redesignating subsection (g) as 
subsection (h) and by inserting after subsection (f) the following new 
subsection:
    ``(g) Highway Motor Fuel Taxes.--In the case of an individual, in 
addition to the taxes otherwise allowable as a deduction under this 
section, there shall be allowed as a deduction for the taxable year an 
amount equal to the sum of--
            ``(1) the State and local excise and sales taxes paid by 
        the taxpayer on gasoline (other than aviation gasoline), diesel 
        fuel, and any other fuel used in a motor vehicle, and
            ``(2) with respect to each gallon of such gasoline, diesel 
        fuel, and other fuel, an amount equal to the portion of the 
        price of such fuel which is equal to the rate of tax imposed on 
        such fuel under chapter 31 or 32.
An amount shall be allowed as a deduction under the preceding sentence 
only if verified in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe.''
    (b) Deduction Allowed Whether or Not Taxpayer Itemizes Other 
Deductions.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:
            ``(18) Highway motor fuel taxes.--The deduction allowed by 
        section 163(g).''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Date: May 2, 2013 

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 

 Parties Attorney(s) 

KATHERYN KIPLING Thomas G. Tasker 

Bradley A. Levin 

Daniel J. Caplis 

Stephen W. Wahlberg 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Franklin D. Patterson 

Katelyn S. Werner 

 Defendant(s) 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

STATUS/TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE 

Court in Session: 9:09 a.m. 

Appearance of counsel. 

Discussion held on admission of insurance policy and limits. 

Discussion held on jury instructions. 

Argument presented on [78] Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Her Present 

Financial Condition. 

ORDERED: [78] Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Her Present Financial 

Condition is DENIED without prejudice. Issue may be raised at trial. 

Argument presented on [77] Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Testimony of Her StepChildren. 

Case 1:11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Document 90 Filed 05/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

ORDERED: [77] Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Testimony of her Step-Children is 

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

Argument presented on [79] Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Other Sums 

Received By Plaintiff. 

ORDERED: [79] Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Other Sums Received 

By Plaintiff is DENIED without prejudice. Issue may be raised at trial. 

Argument presented on [80] Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Her Subsequent Relationship 

with Michael McCasky. 

ORDERED: [80] Plaintiff’sMotion in Limine Regarding Her Subsequent Relationship with 

Michael McCasky is DENIED. 

Argument presented on [82] Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Quicksilver Evidence. 

ORDERED: [82] Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Regarding Quicksilver Evidence is 

GRANTED. 

Discussion held on time limits. 

ORDERED: Time limits previously set by the court for voir dire, openings, and closings will 

not be enforced. 

Case to be tried to a jury of eight (8), each side will be allowed three (3) peremptory challenges. 

Court in Recess: 09:49 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:40 

Case 1:11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Document 90 Filed 05/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





MARCH 31, 2008             /S/ HAIM TSUFF
                      ---------------------------------
                      HAIM TSUFF
                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
INRAD, Inc.
                               181 Legrand Avenue
                               Northvale, NJ 07647
                                                                   Exhibit 10.22
Dr. Warren Ruderman                                            December 31, 1998
45 Duane Lane
Demarest, NJ 07627

Dear Dr. Ruderman:

This letter is written to evidence the agreement between Inrad, Inc. (the
"Company") and you, with respect to the $566,049 principal sum plus $118,872 of
accrued interest which the company presently owes you (the Indebtedness).

By signing below, you hereby agree that as payment for the entire amount of this
Indebtedness of $684,921 you will receive 684,921 shares of the Company's Common
Stock (the "Shares").

You further acknowledge that the Indebtedness represents the entire amount owed
to you by the Company for borrowed money as of the date hereof (as opposed to
compensation and benefits).

By signing below, you also represent to the Company that: ( i ) you are able to
bear the economic risk of the investment in the Shares, ( ii ) you recognize and
agree that the Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended ( the "Act"), ( iii) you recognize and agree that you will be
required to continue to bear the risk of investment in the Shares for an
indefinite period, ( iv ) you recognize and agree that such Shares must be held
by you indefinitely unless a subsequent disposition is registered under the Act
or is exempted from registration under all applicable federal and state
securities laws, ( v ) you recognize and agree that the Company will enter stop
transfer notations in its records with respect to the stock certificates
representing the shares, ( vi ) you have knowledge and experience with respect
to the Company and its business and in financial and business affairs generally
so that you are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective
investment; ( vii ) the Shares are being acquired for your own account for
investment purposes and not with the view of resale or distribution thereof by
you and (viii) you recognize and agree that a restrictive legend will be placed
on the certificates representing the Shares summarizing the restrictions on
transferability outlined above. At your request, the Company will make its best
efforts to register the Shares, only if it qualifies to use Securities and
Exchange Commission Form S3.

Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing below.

Very truly yours,


James L. Greco
Chief Financial Officer

Agreed to as of the 31st day of December, 1998

Warren Ruderman
#### Akron Transportation Co. et al. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Penn-Ohio Coach Lines Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(Nos. 25302 and 25303

Decided May 22, 1935.)

*668
      *Mr. B. H. Nesbitt,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. Donald G. Power,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the orders of the said Public Utilities Commission be, and the same are hereby, affirmed on authority of *Royal Green Coach Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*110 Ohio St., 41, 143 N. E., 547; *Sohngen, Recr.,*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*115 Ohio St., 449, 154 N. E., 734; and *Liberty Highway Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*128 Ohio St., 586, 193 N. E., 407.

*Orders affirmed.*

"Weygandt, . C.J., Stephenson, "Williams, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.