alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 127 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 

to explain the purpose and provide for the administration of the Baca 

National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Act of 2000 to explain the purpose and provide 

for the administration of the Baca National Wildlife Refuge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE BACA NA4 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 Section 6 of the Great Sand Dunes National Park 

6 and Preserve Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 410hhh–4) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 127 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

2 (1) When’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.— 

4 ‘‘(1) ESTABLISHMENT.— 

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—When’’; 

6 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘(2) 

7 Such establishment’’ and inserting the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The establish10 ment of the refuge under subparagraph (A)’’; 

11 and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Baca Na14 tional Wildlife Refuge shall be to restore, enhance, 

15 and maintain wetland, upland, riparian, and other 

16 habitats for native wildlife, plant, and fish species in 

17 the San Luis Valley.’’; 

18 (2) in subsection (c)— 

19 (A) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and in20 serting the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

22 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In administering the 

24 Baca National Wildlife Refuge, the Secretary shall, 

25 to the maximum extent practicable— 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 127 IS

1 ‘‘(A) emphasize migratory bird conserva2 tion; and 

3 ‘‘(B) take into consideration the role of the 

4 Refuge in broader landscape conservation ef5 forts.’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (d)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking the pe10 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) use decreed water rights on the Refuge in 

13 approximately the same manner that the water 

14 rights have been used historically.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
DATAMEG CORP. ISSUES A CORRECTION TO INFE.COM PRESS RELEASE REGARDING
IR SERVICES


WASHINGTON DC, Dec. 5 -- DataMEG Corp. (OTC BB: DTMG) announced
today that they were mistakenly referred to, in a press release issued by
INFE.com, relating to the sales effort of a subsidiary company recently
developed by INFE.com.

Mr. Andrew Benson, President DataMEG Corp. stated, "In its' press release,
issued earlier today, INFE.com and its' subsidiary company, INFE-Relations,
referred to DataMEG Corp. as one of their two new clients. We have asked
INFE.com to clarify that DataMEG Corp. has no Agreement for Investor Relations
work through INFE.com and/or INFE-Relations."

Mr. Benson continued, "DataMEG Corp. has been well served by its present IR
firm, Yes, International. In consideration of what we have been releasing as
news lately, there is no need to obtain additional IR services. Nothing has
changed here, as far as DataMEG Corp. is concerned."

DataMEG Corp., currently headquartered in Washington DC, is an
engineering/technology firm focused on Internet and telecommunications
technology solutions. DataMEG Corp. is developing proprietary technology, its
Communications Acceleration System, (CAS), which allows for the transfer of
information over POTS, DSL and other information transmission networks.

Except for the historical information contained herein, this press release
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that involve a number of risks
and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements may be identified by
reference to a future period by use of forward-looking terminology such as
"expect", "anticipate", "could", "may" and other words of similar nature.
There are certain important factors and risks that could cause results to
differ materially from those anticipated by the statements herein. Such
factors and risks include the successful completion of the CAS technology
development, and the business conditions and growth in related areas of
telecommunications, wireless and digital transmission arenas and in the
economy in general. Competitive factors include the rapid pace of alternative
technology advancements and the Company's ability to gain market acceptance of
its evolving product. Other risks, including the outcome of pending adverse
claims to the Company and it's subsidiary's technology that have been and may
be detailed from time to time in the filings of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Neither DataMEG Corp. or its subsidiary undertake any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Exhibit
      32




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of National Healthcare Technology, Inc.
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period from January 27, 2005 (Inception) through September
      30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
      indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
      the
      best of his knowledge:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/
      ROSS
      LYNDON-JAMES


Name:
      Ross Lyndon-James


Title:
      CEO





/s/
      BRIAN
      HARCOURT


Name:
      Brian Harcourt


Title:
      CFO








Dated:
        February 1, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Administration on Children, Youth and Families

AGENCY: Family and Youth Services Bureau, ACYF, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice to award a replacement grant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA#: 93.616.
    Legislative Authority: Social Security Act, Section 439, as amended 
by the Child and Family Services Improvement Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-
288).
    Amount of Award: $85,000.
    Project Period: September 30, 2008-September 29, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Administration on Children, Youth and Families (ACYF), 
Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), herein announces the awarding 
of a Mentoring Children of Prisoners (MCP) replacement grant to Mother 
Seton House, Inc., in Virginia Beach, VA. A prior grantee recently 
relinquished their MCP grant. With the funds provided, Mother Seton 
House, Inc., will continue the provision of mentoring services for 
children of incarcerated parents in Hampton Roads, VA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis O. Porter, Acting Associate 
Commissioner, Family and Youth Services Bureau, 1250 Maryland Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20024, Phone: 202-205-8102.

    Dated: September 29, 2008.
Joan E. Ohl,
Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.
[FR Doc. E8-23481 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to *

*Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

|   | (1)    | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                  |                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/                   WILLIAM HARTMAN                  William                  Hartman                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Title:                  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting                  Officer) |
| Date:                  May 12, 2006                                                                      |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01943-BNB

RODNEY RAY ZIMMERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOANN SHOEMAKER, 

CATHIE HOLST, 

MR. BURGONDO, 

DEEANN KAHLER, and 

JOSEPH WRIGHT, 

Defendants. 

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

On October 31, 2011, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request Judicial Notice of

Inability to Exhaust (1915)" (Doc. No. 15). The request is DENIED as premature. 

Plaintiff is reminded that he has twenty (20) days from the October 21, 2011

minute order in which to file an amended complaint that complies with the August 24,

2011, order. Failure to do so within the time allowed will result in the dismissal of the

instant action. 

Dated: November 3, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-01943-BNB Document 16 Filed 11/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Order issued: October/8 , 2012

In The

Court of Appeal 

 ifth Bi trict of at Balla 

No. 05-11-01276-CV

EX PARTE: HAROLD CORNISH

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Xll-555-R

ORDER

On October 9, 2012, the Court received the requested findings of fact from the trial court. The

trial court found that the only documents available in this case are: (1) the petition for expunction; (2) the

order of expunction; and (3) a copy of an envelope from the Dallas County District Clerk to the Texas

Association of School Boards with the date stamp of June 15, 2011. We ADOPT the trial court’s finding

that these three documents are the only ones available.

On October 11,2012, the Court received a supplemental clerk’ s record containing the above three

documents. Appellants’ brief is due THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
We have issued our report dated May 11, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Arctic Cat Inc. and subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arctic Cat Inc. for the year ended March 31,
2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in
the Registration Statements of Arctic Cat Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-37065,
effective October 1, 1990, File No. 33-69916, effective October 4, 1993, and
File No. 33-97244, effective September 22, 1995).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 25, 2001
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobius Management Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter E. Takiff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




/s/ Peter E. Takiff
-----------------------
Peter E. Takiff
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2002
Order entered October 2 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 01125 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF E .P.S. AND X.Z.S., CH ILDREN On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 30153 - 2016



### O RDER Before the Court is court reporter LaTresta Ginyard’s September 26, 2019 request for a thirty

- day extension of time to file the record

. She explains the extension is necessary because appellant has requested twenty dates of proceedings be included in the record , and the different reporters involved need to be located

. Because this is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case, we GRANT the request to the extent we ORDER the record be filed no later than October 1 4 , 2019. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 28.4(b)(2), 35.3(c).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, James D. Constantine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative
Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 13, 2005



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James D. Constantine                                               
|James D. Constantine                                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer



30
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.12

                      Schedule to Form of First Amended and
                            Restated Option Agreement

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Project                      Company                   Lessor                 Type of Lessor Entity  Property
<S>                          <C>                       <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Akron, Ohio                  Elder Care Operators of   Nationwide Health      A Maryland             Summit County, Ohio
                             Akron, LLC                Properties, Inc.       corporation

Bristol, Tennessee           Elder Care Operators of   Nationwide Health      A Maryland             Sullivan County,
                             Bristol, LLC              Properties, Inc.       corporation            Tennessee

Hilliard, Ohio               Elder Care Operators of   Nationwide Health      A Maryland             Franklin County, Ohio
                             Hilliard, LLC             Properties, Inc.       corporation

Lakemont Farms,              Elder Care Operators of   MLD Delaware Trust     A Delaware Business    Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania                 Lakemont Farms, LLC                              Trust                  Pennsylvania

Murfreesboro, Tennessee      Elder Care Operators of   Nationwide Health      A Maryland             Rutherford County,
                             Murfreesboro              Properties, Inc.       corporation            Tennessee

York, Pennsylvania           Elder Care Operators of   MLD Delaware Trust     A Delaware Business    York County,
                             York, LLC                                        Trust                  Pennsylvania
</TABLE>




                                       1
<PAGE>   2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Project                         Management Firm
<S>                             <C>
Akron, Ohio                     Balanced Care at Akron, Inc.

Bristol, Tennessee              Balanced Care at Bristol,
                                Inc.

Hilliard, Ohio                  Balanced Care at Hilliard,
                                Inc.

Lakemont Farms, Pennsylvania    Balanced Care at Lakemont
                                Farms, Inc.

Murfreesboro, Tennessee         Balanced Care at
                                Murfreesboro, Inc.

York, Pennsylvania              Balanced Care at York, Inc.
</TABLE>




                                       2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02420-RPM 

NORMAN RIDDLE 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation 

Defendant. 

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO WRITTEN DISCOVERY 

The parties’ Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Written Discovery is 

GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and 

Requests for Production (other than Interrogatory No. 2 and Requests for Production Nos. 7 and 

8) on or before May 30, 2012. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests 

for production on or before June 22, 2012. 

Dated: May 1st, 2012. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/Richard P. Matsch 

 

Richard P. Matsch 

Senior United States District Court Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02420-RPM Document 20 Filed 05/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo. 

### Lader v.

Warden,121 Nev. 682, 686, 120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005).

The district court denied these claims because it concluded that counsel squarely presented the issue of intent to the jury and a voluntary intoxication instruction wasn't warranted under the circumstances, and because the evidence against Mitchell, which included testimony that he confessed to entering the business with the intent to commit a larceny, was overwhelming. The record supports these determinations, and we conclude that the district court did not err by denying these claims.

Second, Mitchell contends that the district court erred by relying on impalpable and highly suspect evidence at sentencing, resulting in a cruel and unusual sentence. Although Mitchell notes that trial counsel did not object below and appellate counsel did not raise such on appeal, he does not argue that the district court erred by finding that counsel were not ineffective. Instead, he argues that this court should review his sentence for excessiveness and reasonableness in the first instance. We decline to do so. 

### See Davis v. State, 107 Nev. 600, 606, 817 P.2d 1169, 1173 (1991) (holding that this court need not consider arguments raised on appeal that were not presented to the district court in the first instance), 

### overruled on other grounds by Means v. State, 120 Nev. 1001, 103 P.3d 25 (2004). Even if we were to construe this claim as a claim arguing that the district court erred by finding that counsel was not ineffective at sentencing, we conclude that it lacks merit because the district court did not err by denying the claim.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2, J.

J. Having considered Mitchell's contentions and concluded that he is not entitled to relief, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Karla K. Butko Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

3
Exhibit 22

                                 ANUHCO, INC.
                            LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES


 Subsidiaries of Anuhco, Inc.        State of Incorporation

Crouse Cartage Company                      Iowa

    Subsidiary of Crouse Cartage Company

   Phoenix Computer Services, Inc.          Kansas

CC Investment Corporation                   Iowa

American Freight System, Inc.
 (d/b/a AFS, Inc.)                          Delaware

Agency Premium Resource, Inc.               Kansas

    Subsidiaries of Agency Premium Resource, Inc.

   Agency Services, Inc.                    Kansas

   APR Funding Corporation                  Delaware

Anuhco Properties, Inc.                     Kansas

Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation    Missouri

UPAC of California, Inc.                    California



 (All companies do business under same name unless otherwise indicated).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Shuffle Master, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard L. Baldwin,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: April 23, 2007                         |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ RICHARD L. BALDWIN                            |   |
| Richard L. Baldwin                                |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No.11-cv-02291-REB-MJW

VERNE JAY MERRELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ALLRED, D.O. FCC Health Services, and

PATRICIA MITCHELL, Program Mgt [sic] Officer, Health Services,

in their individual and professional capacities,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER1

The matter is before the court on Plaintiffs [sic] Motion for Leave to file a

Reply to Defendants’ Response (Doc #103) [#105] filed February 27, 2013. The

motion is GRANTED. It appears that plaintiff’s reply is contained within the body of the

motion, thus the court will treat the motion as a reply.

Dated: February 27, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02291-REB-MJW Document 106 Filed 02/27/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1