alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Denied and Opinion filed October 4, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-16-01036-CV
IN RE: DERIC VALDEZ, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-07033



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridge s, Myers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill

Before the Court is relato r’s September 6, 2016 amended petition for writ of mandamus

in which he seeks relief from temporary orders issued by the trial court in a SAPCR case.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator mu st show both that the trial court has clearly

abused its discretion and that rela tor has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Be cause a trial court’ s temporary orders
are not appealable, mandamus is an a ppropriate means to challenge them. In re Kyburz , 05-15-
01163-CV, 2015 WL 6935912, at *1 (Tex. App.—Da llas Nov. 10, 2015, or ig. proceeding)
(mem. op.). Based on the record before us, we conc lude relator has not s hown he is entitled to
the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40
(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).2 Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

161036F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 955 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 184
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 955

                          [Report No. 110-522]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Thursday, February 7, 
2008, relating to a bill to provide economic stimulus.
                                                 House Calendar No. 184

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 955

                          [Report No. 110-522]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

WENDY CABRERA,

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v.

THE ORIGINAL HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY OF GEORGIA, INC.,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 1, 2012.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ partially unopposed Motion for Ninety-Day Extension of

Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines [filed July 31, 2012; docket #135]. Plaintiffs do not

demonstrate good cause for a lengthy 90-day extension at this stage; however, the Court finds good

cause to grant a 60-day extension of the deadlines in this case. Therefore, the Scheduling Order

shall be modified as follows:

Discovery cutoff: October 31, 2012

Dispositive motions deadline: November 30, 2012

The Court notes that this matter was filed more than ten months ago. Accordingly, the Court will

grant no further extensions of these deadlines absent a showing of exceptional cause.

Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 140 Filed 08/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Greystone Multi-Family Builders, Inc. v. TES Electric LP

Appellate case number: 01-15-00640-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-03393

Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Greystone Multi-Family Builders, Inc., has filed a notice of 

interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to compel 

arbitration and motion to stay, signed on July 6, 2015. Appellant has also filed a motion 

for stay seeking a stay of the trial court proceedings during the pendency of the 

interlocutory appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3. The motion is granted. The trial court 

proceedings in cause number 2015-033393 in the 125th District Court of Harris County

are stayed. The stay is effective until disposition of this appeal or further order of this 

Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 15, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the registered holders of ML-CFC Commercial

Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006-3,

Plaintiff,

v.

GLENWOOD HOSPITALITY, INC.,

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF ARKANSAS, LLC,

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF COLORADO, LLC,

GERALD R. SPRONG, and

W.A. COLIN NOBLE,

Defendants.

HOSPITALITY RECEIVER, LLC,

Receiver.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Unopposed Joint Motion to Amend

Scheduling Order [Docket No. 71; Filed October 5, 2012] (the “Motion”).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#71] is GRANTED. The Scheduling

Order entered on May 30, 2012 [#59] is amended to extend the following deadlines:

• Affirmative Expert Disclosure Deadline December 3, 2012

• Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline January 7, 2013

• Deadline to Serve Written Discovery Requests December 14, 2012

• Discovery Deadline January 16, 2013

• Dispositive Motions Deadline March 4, 2013

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant Gerald R.

Sprong’s First Set of Written Discovery Requests on or before November 8, 2012.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff’s written

discovery requests, served on September 25, 2012, on or before November 21, 2012.

Dated: October 9, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM Document 74 Filed 10/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Kirk M. Warshaw,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-----------------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
July 26, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Newport
News Shipbuilding Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 18, 2000, and the
related Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the six months ended June 18,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-18-2000
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   589
<PP&E>                                           1,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                     890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              450
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,496
<SALES>                                          1,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,001
<CGS>                                              901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     76
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 45
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        45
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 18, 2006



/s/ Jack W. OehlkeJack W. OehlkePresident and Chief Executive Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 13 

To temporarily extend increases in certain home loan limits. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2008 

Mr. MARTINEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To temporarily extend increases in certain home loan limits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF LOAN LIMIT IN4 CREASE. 

5 (a) FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC.—Section 

6 201(a) of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (Public Law 

7 110–185, 122 Stat. 619) is amended by striking ‘‘Decem8 ber 31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 

9 (b) FHA LOANS.—Section 202(a) of the Economic 

10 Stimulus Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–185, 122 Stat. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 13 IS

1 620) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2008’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2009’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
|   (1)   | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: October 26, 2011 | By:/s/ Ronald D. Croatti      Ronald D. Croatti, President and      Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer) |
Case 1:11-sw-05438-MJW Document 12 Filed 11/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kamal Karna Roy also known as 

Dr. Joseph Geronimo, Jr.,

for We the People by Jungle

Democracy

v. Civil No. 07-cv-199-SM

We the People by US Government Authority

George W. Bush, United States of America,

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joseph Liberman,

Eliot Spitzer

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff has filed a pile of papers with “gibberish”

writings that the Clerk accepted as a complaint. Because it was

incomprehensible and did not comply with LR 5.1 or Fed. R. Civ.

P. 8(a), I ordered that plaintiff refile it in accordance with LR

5.1 and Rule 8 (not 5 as indicated). Plaintiff failed to refile

as directed. The court lacks jurisdiction over any of the

parties. I recommend that the “complaint” be dismissed without

prejudice. 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file

objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal

the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of Law

Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 5 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Committee v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992); United

States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).

 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: August 21, 2007

cc: Kamal Karna Roy, pro se

 

Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 5 Filed 08/21/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 12, 2008



/s/ Ronald F. KlawitterRonald F. KlawitterExecutive Vice President of Administration,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Newkirk *v.*Newkirk.

(No. 25171

Decided May 15, 1935.)

*Messrs. Young & Young,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Milton Friedman,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed, and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed, on authority of *Corbett*v. *Corbett,*123 Ohio St., 76, 174 N. E., 10.

*Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Williams, J., concurs in the judgment.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Edy Francis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





December 20, 2012





/s/ EDY FRANCIS


EDY FRANCIS


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 5 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 5 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 5 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02498-LTB Document 5 Filed 09/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4197

_____________________________

NIRAV PATEL, MAHENDRA PATEL 

and ARRR TRUCK STOP, LLC, a

Florida Limited Liability 

Company,

Appellants,

v.

HAMILTON, LLC, a Florida 

Limited Liability Company,

HARRISON PLUMBING, INC., a 

Florida Corporation,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

Timothy Register, Judge.

May 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Kerry Adkison of Kerry Adkison, P.A., Chipley, for Appellants.

Michael Wm Mead of Mead Law Firm, Fort Walton Beach, for 

Appellee.
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00297-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ERIC SHAWN COPELAND,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 20, 2011. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for November 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the

documents are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no

exceptions to this policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them

an original and one (1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See 

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. That the suppression hearing set for November 3, 2011, is VACATED; and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for the change of

hearing.

Dated: October 21, 2011
#### Lena COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Sept. 24, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Susan J. Matloff et al., Appellants, v Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondent, and Victor Lopez, Respondent-Respondent.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Victor Lopez as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 11, 1990, for the party position of Male Member of the Democratic State Committee from the 53rd Assembly District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated August 10, 1990, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements *(see, Matter of Velez v Nieves,*164 AD2d 931 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Rubin, Harwood, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.