alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
 AGENCY: Department of Defense.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Defense published a notice on September 11, 2008 (73 FR 52835) announcing a closed meeting of the U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Comprehensive Review Advisory Committee. This notice is being published to announce changes in the meeting time, place, and agenda.
 DATES: October 7, 2008 (0800-1630) and October 8, 2008 (0800-1645)
 ADDRESSES: Nuclear Command and Control System Support Staff, 5201 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500, Falls Church, Virginia 22041.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William L. Jones, (703) 681-8681, U.S. Nuclear Command and Control System Support Staff (NSS), Skyline 3, 5201 Leesburg Pike, Suite 500, Falls Church, Virginia 22041.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Agenda Oct 7 2008 NSS 
                    ( print page 57609) Time
Topic
Presenter(s)8:30 a.m.
Welcome & Administrative Remarks
CAPT Budney, USN.8:45 a.m.
Current Stockpile Status (Size, Funding)
Greenaugh.9:15 a.m.
ROSA
Kusnezov.9:45 a.m.
Advanced Certification
Deeney.10:15 a.m.
Break10:30 a.m.
Testing and Simulation
Kusnezov.12:00 p.m.
Lunch1:00 p.m.
Nuclear Weapons Complex—Capabilities
Allen.1:30 p.m.
Nuclear Weapons Complex—Transformation
Allen.2:00 p.m.
Nuclear Expertise
TBD.2:15 p.m.
Break2:30 p.m.
Nuclear Stockpile Management Surveillance/WARTS
Neeley.3:00 p.m.
Modernization (RRW vs LEP)
Greenaugh.3:30 p.m.
Throughput Initiatives
Greenaugh.4:00 p.m.
Executive Session4:30 p.m.
Adjourn
 Oct 8 2008 NSS Time
Topic
Presenter(s)8:30 a.m.
Nuclear Explosive Safety, ENDS, SS-21, ESD
Greenaugh.9:00 a.m.
Security
NA-70.9:30 a.m.
Use Control, PAL, UCEC National Laboratory Perspective
Greenaugh.10:00 a.m.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
LLNL.10:30 a.m.
Break10:45 a.m.
Los Alamos National Laboratory
LANL.11:15 a.m.
Sandia National Laboratory
SNL.11:45 a.m.
Lunch1:00 p.m.
Accident/Incident/Emergency Response
NA-40.1:45 p.m.
NSPD-28 Implementation Status
NA-40.1:00 p.m.
POG Process
SSP.1:30 p.m.
POG Process
AF AF/NWC.2:15 p.m.
Break2:30 p.m.
DoD Nuclear Weapon Surety 
                             Unauthorized Launch Analysis (ULA)  
                             Unauthorized Use Analysis (UUA)
SSP & AFSC.3:30 p.m.
Schlesinger Task Force Report
TBD.4:15 p.m.
Executive Session4:45 p.m.
Adjourn
 Dated: September 25, 2008. Patricia L. Toppings, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.


[FR Doc. E8-23309 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Emray Realty Corp., Appellant, *v.*Irene Lloyd, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 13, 1956.

*Arnold Schildhaus*for appellant.

*Shyleur Barrack,*and *Mortimer Getzels*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Where a final order has been granted and eviction warrant has been issued, after trial in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction to set aside the final order and warrant. *(Hanover Bank*v. *De Koenigsberg,*207 Misc. 1088, affd. no opinion 285 App. Div. 928; *Wassel*v. *Reimer,*119 N. Y. S. 2d 33; *Hendricks*v. *Ergis,*66 N. Y. S. 2d 349). The issuance of the warrant terminated the relationship of landlord and tenant and the Municipal Court loses jurisdiction of the parties where the final order and warrant has been issued after a trial *(16-18 East 30th St. Realty Corp.*v. *Feller,*191 N. Y. S. 332; *Schulte, Inc., v. Cross,*146 Misc. 763; *Christatos*v. *United Cigar Stores Co.,*144 Misc. 322; *Mann*v. *Munch Brewery,*225 N. Y. 189, 194; *Hewen Co.*v. *Thibaut Realty Co.,*154 Misc. 687, 698).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order and warrant for landlord reinstated, with costs.

Aueelio and Tilzeb, JJ., concur; Hofstadteb, J., dissents.

Order reversed, etc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB

ALVIN MOSCH,

PATRICIA C. MOSCH, and

DAVID K. MOSCH, each individually and d/b/a Mosch Mining Company,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN HENRY, a/k/a John T. Henry a/k/a John L. Henry,

UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, and any one claiming by

of through any of the named persons,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order (Docket No. 152) of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on

January 28, 2013 it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N.

Boland entered on November 6, 2012 is ACCEPTED and AFFIRMED. It is

 FURTHER ORDERED that the documents recorded by Mr. Henry and bearing

Reception Nos. 234546, 234547, 234548, 235276, 248446, 258531, and 260614

(Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 1.1 through 1.7) are declared spurious under section 38-35-201(3),

C.R.S., are held invalid, and are released pursuant to section 38-35-204(2), C.R.S. It is

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 153 Filed 02/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction is

DENIED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are AWARDED reasonable attorney fees

upon motion pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are AWARDED costs, to be taxed by the

Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 6th day of February, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 153 Filed 02/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. C R ISTOB AL AM A

NC IO M OR

ALES, a .k.a . Am anc io C ristoba l M ora le s-B e ltra n, De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 15-50221

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00964-DM G M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dolly M . Ge e , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 27, 2016 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , SILVER M AN, a nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C ristoba l Am anc io M ora le s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 60-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for 

# FIL ED OCT 04 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c onspira c y

to distribute

c o c a ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B ), and 846. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . M ora le s c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d

in de ny ing his re que st for sa fe ty -va lve re l i e f. W e re v ie w for c le a r e rror, se eUnite d State

s v . Me j ia-Pime ntal , 477 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th C ir. 2007), a nd find none . The re c o rd supports the distric t c o urt’ s finding tha t M ora le s did not truthfully provide the gove rnm e nt with a ll of theinform ation heha d c onc e rning theoffe nse . Se e 18 U.S.C . § 3553(f)(5); U.S.S.G. § 5C 1.2(a )(5). M ore ove r, c ontra ry to M o ra le s’ s c onte ntion, his proffer se ssions did not c onstitute a “ good fa ith” e ffort to c oope rate with thegove rnm e nt. Se eMe jia-Pime ntal , 477 F.3d a

t 1106 (a de fe nda nt who provide s e va sive answe rs and whose c onduc t wa s m ore e xte nsive tha n his proffe r sugge sts ha s not m e t the good fa ith sta

nda rd). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 5 0 2 2 1 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.01

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sunil Wadhwani,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Sunil Wadhwani
_____________________________
Sunil Wadhwani
Chief Executive Officer



November 12, 2002

     This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
     of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,106,996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,211,012
<PP&E>                                         941,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,845,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          431,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,787
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,412,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,845,836
<SALES>                                        560,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               600,745
<CGS>                                          718,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,984,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,383,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,383,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,383,718)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Juvencio ACOSTA-GARCIA, aka Juan Juvencio Acosta, Juan Garcia Acosta, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-10476. D.C. No. CR-02-00482-FJM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 24, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Juan Juvencio Acosta-Garcia appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Acosta-Garcia has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Acosta-Garcia has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising two issues.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues requiring further review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT

CLYDE HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICER MICHAEL LUMBARD, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER LAURA FRANKLIN, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER NOEL IKEDO, Denver Police Dept., and

OFFICER JOHN DOE, Denver Police Dept.,

Defendants.

ORDER AFFIRMING AUGUST 22, 2013, RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the August 22, 2013, Recommendation 

by United States Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya that Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Doc. # 40) be granted. (Doc. # 127.) The Recommendation is 

incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were 

due within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. 

(Doc. # 45 at 17-18.) Despite this advisement, no objections to Magistrate Judge 

Tafoya’s Recommendation were filed by either party. 

“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate 

[judge’s] report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 

1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating 

Case 1:11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT Document 46 Filed 09/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a 

magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when 

neither party objects to those findings.”). 

The Court has reviewed all the relevant pleadings concerning Defendants’ 

Motion for Summary Judgment and the Recommendation. Based on this review, the 

Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Tafoya’s thorough and comprehensive analyses 

and recommendations are correct and that “there is no clear error on the face of the 

record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, advisory committee’s note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS 

the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tafoya as the findings and conclusions of 

this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States 

Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 45) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 

# 40) is GRANTED and the claims against Defendants Lumbard, Franklin, and Ikeda

are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that claims against Defendant John Doe be DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE. 

All Defendants having been dismissed, this case is now CLOSED in its entirety. 

DATED: September 06 , 2013

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT Document 46 Filed 09/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-56590, 33-71700, as amended by Post-Effective
Amendments  No. One and Two, 333-77617, and 333-76296) of Pizza Inn, Inc. of our
report  dated  September  26,  2002  relating  to  the  consolidated  financial
statements  and  financial  statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP

Dallas,  Texas
September  26,  2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MLCFC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST 2006-3, COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

GLENWOOD HOSPITALITY, INC.; NOBLE PROPERTIES OF ARKANSAS, LLC; NOBLE 

PROPERTIES OF COLORADO, LLC; 

 Defendants. 

CONSENT ORDER APPROVING

RECEIVER’S SALE OF PROPERTY 

 This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Motion for the Court to Approve and 

Confirm the Sale of Property and Receiver’s Report on Same (the “Motion”). Following a 

hearing on February 28, 2013, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

1. The Court authorizes Hospitality Receiver, LLC (the “Receiver”) to sell the “Hawthorn 

Park Inn & Suites” located at 2407 N. Arkansas, Russellville, Arkansas 78201 and the 

improvements and personal property located thereon (collectively, the “Property”), at a 

purchase price of $725,000.00. 

2. At request of the parties, the approved sale is not subject to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 2001(b) and 2004. 

SO ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2013. 

Case 1:11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM Document 93 Filed 03/01/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
BY THE COURT:

 

 Marcia S. Krieger 

 Chief United States District Judge 

CONSENTED TO AND APPROVED: 

s/ Sean M. Hanlon s/ Frederick T. Winters 

Michael J. Carrigan 

Risa Lynn Wolf-Smith 

Sean M. Hanlon 

Holland & Hart LLP 

Post Office Box 8749 

Denver, Colorado 80201-8749 

Phone: (303) 295-8000 

Fax: (303) 295-8261 

Email: mcarrigan@hollandhart.com; 

rwolf@hollandhart.com; 

smhanlon@hollandhart.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Frederick T. Winters 

Frederick T. Winters, LLC 

5156 W. Fair PlaceLittleton, CO 80123 

Phone: (303) 798-1564 

Cell: (303) 726-3262 

Email: ftwinters1@aol.com 

Attorney for Defendants Glenwood Hospitality, 

Inc.; Noble Properties of Arkansas, LLC; and 

Noble Properties of Colorado, LLC

Case 1:11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM Document 93 Filed 03/01/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

                                CERTIFICATIONS

I, Winfred  Fields,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Calypso  Wireless,  Inc.  (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

      a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



Date:  April 19, 2004

                                           By:/s/ Winfred Fields
                                           ---------------------
                                           Winfred Fields
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                                                           EXHIBIT 10(i)
GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                            SURPLUS NOTE

Golden American Life Insurance Company agrees to pay ING America
Insurance Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation, the sum of $75 million
($75,000,000.00) plus interest at the rate of 7.75%  per annum from the
date hereof, September 30, 1999 until paid.  In any event, this note
will mature on September 29, 2029.

This Surplus Note and accrued interest thereon shall be subordinate to
payments due to policyholders, claimant and beneficiary claims, as well
as debts owed to all other classes of debtors, other than surplus note
holders, of Golden American Life Insurance Company in the event of (a)
the institution of bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency or
liquidation proceedings by or against Golden American Life Insurance
Company, or (b) the appointment of a Trustee, receiver or other
Conservator for a substantial part of Golden American Life Insurance
Company properties.

Any payments made shall first apply to accrued interest, and the
balance of such payment shall apply to reduce the principal of this
Note.

Any payment of principal and/or interest made shall be subject to the
prior approval of the Delaware Insurance Commissioner.  If the
Commissioner has not approved payment of principal to retire the note
prior to its maturity date, the maturity date will be automatically
extended until such time as the Commissioner authorizes payment of the
final balance of principal.

Golden American Life Insurance Company hereby waives presentment and
notice of dishonor.

In witness whereof, Golden American Life Insurance Company has caused
this Note to be executed and delivered.


                                GOLDEN AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

                                By: /s/ Stephen J. Preston
                                   --------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Preston, Executive
                                         Vice President


Attest by:

/s/ David L. Jacobson
--------------------------
David L. Jacobson
Senior Vice President and
    Assistant Secretary


<PAGE>
<PAGE>