T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

Th e H o n o r ab l e Re b e c c aR. Pa l l me y e r , D i s tr i c tJ u d g e f o rth e U . S. ** * D i s tr i c tC our tf

orN or the rn I l l i noi s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AM ES LE E L I KE, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J A CK PA LM ER, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 17571 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 2 5 5 - RCJ - V PC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R obe r tC l i ve J one s , C hi e f D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r6, 2011 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: T R O T T and B E A , C i rc ui tJudg es , and P A L L M E Y E R , D i stri ctJudg e. *** J a m e s L ik e , aN e v a d as ta te p r is o n e r , ap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s d e n ia l o f h is 2 8 U. S . C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e t i t i o n . We r e v i e w de no vo the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de c i s i on 

# FI LED DE C 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSL i ke a r gue s tha thi s s e nt e nc e di f f e r s f r om tha ti n A ndr ade be c aus e he l a c ks 1 th e p o s s ib ility o f

p a r o le . W e a r e n o t p e r s u a d e d th a t th e a v a ilab ility o f p a r o le in other s i tuat i on s r equi re s adi ff er entre sul there . to d e n y a§ 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e titio n . G on zalezv. Kno w les , 5 1 5 F .3 d 1 0 0 6 , 1 0 1 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 2253 a nd w e a f f i rm . T he pa r t i e s a r e f

a m i l i a rw i th the f

a c t s unde r l y i ng the appe a l a nd thus w e do noti nc l ude them here . L ik e c h a lle n g e s h is s e n te n c e o f lif e w ith o u t p a r o le f

o rg r a n d la r c e n y au to un der N evada’ s habi tual cr i m i nal ac t , N ev. R ev. S t at . § 2 07 . 01 0, base d o n three pri or conv i ct i on s f

or forgery , att em pt ed grand l ar ce ny, and att em pt ed theft , as cruel a n d u n u s u a l p u n is h m e n t u n d e rth e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t. B e c au s e L ik e f ile d h is f e d e r a l h ab e a s p e titio n a f te rA p r il 2 6 , 1 9 9 6 , th e A n tite rr o r is m a n d E f f e c tiv e D e a th P e na l ty A c tof

1996 ( “ A E D P A ” ) appl i e s . T he N e va daS upr e m e C our t ’ s de c i s i on af fi rm i ng L i ke’ s s ent ence w as no tcontraryt o, or an un re as on abl e app l i ca t i on of, c le a r ly e s tab lis h e d f

e d e r a l la w . Se e L oc k

y e rv . A ndr ade , 538 U . S . 63, 77 ( 2003) (tw o con se cut i ve tw enty- fi ve-y ears -t o-l i fe se nt ence s und erC al i forni a three -s tri kes l aw base d o n sever al pri or conv i ct i on s di d n otvi ol at e the E i gh th A m endm ent ). 1 T here fore , the di stri ctcourtprop er l y deni ed habeas r el i ef . AF F I RME D.