alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The City of Clairton, PA :

:

v. : No. 1757 C.D. 2019

:

Zoning Hearing Board of the City of :

Clairton, PA, and Cornerstone :

Residence, Inc. :

:

Cornerstone Residence, Inc. :

:

v. :

:

Zoning Hearing Board of the City of :

Clairton, PA and George Glagola, :

City of Clairton Zoning Officer :

:

Appeal of: City of Clairton, PA and :

George Glagola :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 25, 2021, having considered Appellants’ application for 

reargument and Appellee Cornerstone Residence, Inc.’s answer in response thereto, 

the application is denied.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of First National Corporation



|                                        |  |                    |  |                      
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ---------------------
|                                        |  | Name of Subsidiary |  | State of Organization
|First Bank, Inc.                        |  | Virginia          
|- First Bank Financial Services, Inc.   |  | Virginia          
|- Shen-Valley Land Holdings, LLC        |  | Virginia          
|First National (VA) Statutory Trust I   |  | Delaware          
|First National (VA) Statutory Trust II  |  | Delaware          
|First National (VA) Statutory Trust III |  | Delaware
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

2

“[#11]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00368-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On October 17, 2011, commencing at 10:00 a.m., the court shall conduct a

hearing on Motion (Letter) to continue trial date [#11]2 filed October 11, 2011. That, to

the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of Colorado shall assist

the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing. 

Dated: October 12, 2011
Order filed July 22, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00408-CV

____________

GIOVANNY LAGUAN, Appellant

V.

R.D. PARIKH, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-CCV-052722

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 27, 2014. To date, the filing 

fee of $195.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established 

indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the 

following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before August 6, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 
fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>1
 DATA STATED IN THOUSANDS


             VOLUNTARY SCHEDULE - CERTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION



REGULATION         STATEMENT CAPTION                   2000    1999    1998

5-02 (1)            Cash and Cash Items               23927   17410    29720
5-02 (2)            Marketable Securities            103094   99137   109730
5-02 (3)(b)(1)      Notes Receivable                 340959  325377   307331
5-02 (4)            Allowance for Doubtful Accounts    3763    3718     3872
5-02 (15)           Total Assets                     500954  472670   472153
5-02 (24)           Other Liabilities                454065  428990   429071
5-02 (30)           Common Stock                       3718    3705     3690
5-02 (31)(a)(2)     Additional Capital Other          15302   15034    14591
5-02 (31)(a)(3)(ii) Retained Earnings-Unappropriated  27957   24941    24801
5-03 (b)(1)(e)      Other Revenues                    44209   41756    39841
5-03 (b)(2)(e)      Cost of Other Revenues            19543   16129    15869
5-03 (b)(8)         Interest and Amortization of
                    Debt Discount                     19543   16780    17288
5-03 (b)(10)        Income Before Taxes & Other Items  6609    8847     6684
5-03 (b)(11)        Income Tax Expense                 1997    3048     2210
5-03 (b)(14)        Income/Loss from Continuing
                    Operations                         4612    5799     4474
5-03 (b)(17)        Cumulative Change in Accounting
5-03 (b)(19)        Net Income or Loss                 4612    5799     4474
#### Marino, Appellant, *v.*Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

*Insurance*— Fire *insurance*— Time *for suit*— Proofs *of loss.*

Where a fire insurance company objects to proofs of loss for perfectly valid reasons, which are specifically stated, and the insured furnishes supplemental proofs to meet the objections, a suit is prematurely brought forty-nine days after the supplemental proofs have been furnished, where the policy provides that the loss shall not be payable until sixty days after satisfactory proofs have been received by the company.

Argued Jan. 3, 1910.

Appeal, No. 108,

Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1906, No. 2,273, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of Carmini Marino v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.'

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on a policy of fire insurance. Before Kinsey, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

At the trial the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,610. The court subsequently entered judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

*Error assigned*was in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

*Joseph S. Goodbread,*with him *J. Joseph Stratton,*for appellant.

*Frank R. Shattuck,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

February 14,1910:

■This appeal is from a judgment entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto on the ground that the action had been prematurely brought. By the terms of the policy of fire in*121surance on which the action was based, the loss was not payable until sixty days after satisfactory proofs had been received by the defendant. The fire occurred in February, and a few days thereafter a paper on which was written a list of articles of merchandise, but which was without a heading or signature or any words to indicate what it had reference to, was sent to the defendant’s office. Nothing that could be considered as intended as a proof of loss within the requirements of the policy, was furnished until April 23. The formal proof then furnished was objected to because of the failure to state therein the purpose for which the building was occupied at the time of the fire, and to attach the certificate of a magistrate as required by the policy, and the specific grounds of objection were clearly stated. Supplemental proofs were furnished on May 17, and suit was brought forty-nine days thereafter.

The objection to the proof of April 23 was not capricious but was well founded, because of the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the plainly printed conditions of his policy, and there was no waiver. The justice of the demand for the supplemental proof was recognized by the plaintiff, who did not stand on the first formal proof, and until it was furnished there was not a compliance with the conditions of the policy, and until sixty days thereafter there was no right of action: Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Hocking, 115 Pa. 407.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements

..    Form S-3, No. 333-31306,
..    Form S-8, No. 333-41123,
..    Form S-3, No. 333-48790,
..    Form S-8, No. 333-61559,
..    Form S-8, No. 333-76360,
..    Form S-3, No. 333-82499, and
..    Form S-8, No. 333-87694

     of our report dated December 6, 2002, with respect to the fiscal 2002
consolidated financial statements of Integral Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
2002.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

McLean, Virginia
December 12, 2002
| (1)   | such                Form 10QSB of ZAP for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the                Securities Exchange of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months                ended                September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the                financial condition and results of operations of ZAP                . |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                         |                                    |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                         |
|                              |                                    |                               |
| Date:                November 11, 2005 | By:                                | /s/ William                Hartman |
|                                   | William                Hartman               |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer  |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending April 18, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00741

- CR

Sidney Lee Snyder, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTR ICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
NO. CR2018

- 334, THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Sidney Lee Snyder has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The

motion is signed by both appellant and his attorney. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We g rant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See id

.

_________ _________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 21, 2019

D o Not Publish
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2358]



[[Page 7535]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Notice of Intent to Grant Partially Exclusive License of U.S. 
Patent Application No. 11/82,432 Entitled ``A Method and System for 
Treating Metal-Containing Fluid Emissions'' and U.S. Patent Application 
No. 10/931,232 ``Perlite Sorbents for Vapor Phase Metals and Metals 
Compounds'' to Bouldin & Lawson, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice published in the Federal Register on January 25, 
2008 (73 FR 4544) was missing the corporation name. The partially 
exclusive license will be granted to Bouldin & Lawson, LLC., 70 Easy 
Street, McMinnville, TN 37110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Bea Shahin, (217) 373-7234, Fax 
(217) 373-7210; Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c486a1a5ea97ea97aca5acadaa84b1b7a5a7a1eaa5b6a9bdeaa9ada8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d193b4b0ff82ff82b9b0b9b8bf91a4a2b0b2b4ffb0a3bca8ffbcb8bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-2358 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IV 

House Calendar No. 168 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 861 

[Report No. 110–489] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4351) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code to provide individuals temporary relief from the alternative 

minimum tax, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4351) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code to provide individuals temporary relief from the alternative minimum tax, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 4351) to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide in4 dividuals temporary relief from the alternative minimum 

5 tax, and for other purposes. All points of order against 

6 consideration of the bill are waived except those arising 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 861 RH 

1 under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be consid2 ered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 

3 bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

4 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

5 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

6 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

7 of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 

8 to recommit. 

9 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4351 pursuant 

10 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

11 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid12 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

13 the Speaker. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 168 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 861 

[Report No. 110

–489] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4351) 

minimum tax, and for other purposes. individuals temporary relief from the alternative to amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 33-25427, 33-25428,
33-25429, 33-25430, 33-32767, 33-43280, 33-63798 and 33-63800 of our report
dated February 13, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hycor
Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 25, 1998


                                       41
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02421-REB-MJW

ALEMAYEHU GETACHEW,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

7-ELEVEN, INC.,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

A court’s decision to grant or deny a motion to stay is within the sound discretion

of the court. See Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co. v. Am. Online Inc., 206 F.3d 980, 987

(10th 2000). “When applying for a stay, a party must show ‘a clear case of hardship or

inequity’ if ‘even a fair possibility’ exists that the stay would damage another party.” Id.

(quoting Span-Eng Assocs. V. Weidner, 711 F.2d 464, 468 (10th Cir. 1985)). The court

finds that, given plaintiff’s voluminous and largely duplicative filings in this matter, any

delay will fairly damage defendant. The court further finds that plaintiff has not shown a

clear case of hardship.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Docket No.

79) is DENIED.

Date: July 12, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02421-REB-MJW Document 81 Filed 07/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02461–CMA–KMT

CLYDE HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

OFFICER MICHAEL LUMBARD, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER LAURA FRANKLIN, Denver Police Dept.,

OFFICER NOEL IKEDO, Denver Police Dept., and

OFFICER JOHN DOE, Denver Police Dept., 

Defendants.

ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The above captioned case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya by

District Judge Christine M. Arguello, pursuant to the Order of Reference dated December 19,

2011. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b).

It is hereby ORDERED that a Preliminary Scheduling Conference is set for February

23, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom C-201, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers U.S.

Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado.

The parties need not comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and

D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. and 26.1. The purpose of the initial conference is to consider the nature

and status of the case, the timing for filing of any motions, and what discovery, if any, will be

needed. 

Case 1:11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT Document 21 Filed 02/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff, or his/her case manager, shall arrange for his/her participation via telephone and

shall call (303) 335-2780 at the scheduled time.

Dated this 1st day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02461-CMA-KMT Document 21 Filed 02/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Hugh B. LOTT and Mary Alma Lott, his Wife, Appellants, v. Jack K. BALLARD, Melba H. Ballard, Sam F. Loughridge and Thelma M. Loughridge, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Dec. 21, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7770

EUGENE ARTHUR PORTER, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

H. R. POWELL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-272-3)

Submitted: February 9, 1999 Decided: March 15, 1999

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Moore Barley, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Hazel

Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the

certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. See Porter v. Powell, No. CA-98-272-3 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 145 

To make funds available for Pacific Salmon emergency disaster assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. SMITH, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To make funds available for Pacific Salmon emergency 

disaster assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Salmon Emer5 gency Disaster Assistance Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PACIFIC SALMON EMERGENCY DISASTER ASSIST7 ANCE. 

8 (a) APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.—In addition to any 

9 other funds available for such purpose, there is appro10 priated to the Secretary of Commerce $60,400,000 to 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 145 IS

1 make a lump sum payment to the Pacific States Marine 

2 Fisheries Commission. The Commission shall distribute 

3 such amount among fishing communities, Indian tribes, 

4 small businesses, including fishermen, fish processors, and 

5 related businesses, individuals, and other entities for as6 sistance for the economic and social effects of the commer7 cial fishery failure designated under section 312(a) of the 

8 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage9 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(a)) to mitigate the economic 

10 losses to such communities, tribes, businesses, individuals 

11 or other entities caused by closures or other restrictions 

12 on the harvesting of Klamath River Fall Chinook salmon. 

13 (b) LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.— 

14 The Secretary of Commerce may not use more than 4 per15 cent of the amount appropriated under this section for ad16 ministrative expenses. 

17 (c) UNUSED FUNDS.—Any amount appropriated pur18 suant to this section that is not expended or otherwise ob19 ligated for the purpose described in subsection (a) shall 

20 be returned to the Treasury of the United States. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Russell Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

    /s/ Russell Smith
        ------------
        Russell Smith
   Chief Executive Officer

February 1, 2010














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

      /s/ Brian Stewart
          -------------
          Brian Stewart
      Chief Financial Officer

February 1, 2010