alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          41,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,785
<PP&E>                                         170,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,777
<BONDS>                                          7,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,425
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,882
<SALES>                                         52,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,635
<CGS>                                           61,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,968)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (40,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000719612
<NAME> THE LEARNING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          95,137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,226
<INVENTORY>                                     29,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,004
<PP&E>                                          32,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,356
<BONDS>                                        294,356
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                   (104,283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,791
<SALES>                                        392,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,438
<CGS>                                          111,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  673,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (414,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    61,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (425,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (425,667)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.59)
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 14

- 00112

- CR

TEVIN SHERARD ELLIOT T

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- 1543

- C2

ORDER

Tevin Sherard Elliott was convicted of two counts of sexual assault. See T EX

.

P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 22.011 (West 2011). The State’s brief in this appeal was originally

due on October 22, 2014. The State has requested and been granted three extensions of

time to file its brief. It has now filed a fourth motion for extension of time to file its

brief.

The State’s motion is denied. Its brief is ORDERED to be filed no later than 5:00

p.m. on February 12, 2015.Elliott v. State Page 2 PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion denied

Order issued and filed January 29, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01971-WJM-CBS

MILLENNIUM CRYOGENIC TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., a Canadian Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

WEATHERFORD ARTIFICIAL LIFT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P., a Louisiana Limited Partnership,

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC., A Delaware Corporation,

WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, LTD., a Swiss Joint-Stock Corporation

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

SUPPLEMENT ITS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 12(b)(6)

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is before this Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to

Supplement its Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint

Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed December 20, 2011 (ECF No. 51). The Court having

considered the Motion and finding good cause ORDERS as follows:

The Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Supplement to Response in

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) is accepted

as filed as Attachment 1 to ECF No. 51.

Case 1:11-cv-01971-WJM-CBS Document 52 Filed 12/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated this 20th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01971-WJM-CBS Document 52 Filed 12/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JERRY E. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MOORE, Ms.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 22

- 15567

D.C. No.

2:18

- cv

- 02427

- RFB

- VCF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted N ove mber 3, 2023 * *

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Jerry E. Johnson appeals pro se from the district

court ’ s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment violations arising from unsanitary conditions of confinement

. We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 3 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Johnson

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the prison staff

consciously disregarded an excessive risk to Johnson’s health by exposing him

to unsanitary conditions when he was placed temporarily in an unclean cell for

several hours during the transfer of a group of inmates to different cell placements

within the prison. See Toguchi v. Chung

, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056

- 58 (9th Cir.

2004) (prison officials are deliberately indifferent only if they know of and

disregard an excessive risk of serious harm to inmate health ) ; Anderson v. County

of Kern , 45 F.3d 1310, 1314

- 15 (9th Cir. 1995) (lack of sanitation must be severe

and prolonged to constitute an Eighth Amendment violation).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Mitchell Gross
-----------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-11-PB

Jordan Levasseur

 O R D E R

The defendant has moved, through counsel, to continue the

trial scheduled for November 3, 2009 for a period of 60 days to

allow time to reschedule the plea hearing which was cancelled due

to the unavailability of defense counsel who recently underwent

surgery. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from November 3, 2009 to January 5, 2010. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(7)(A) that for the above-stated reason, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00011-PB Document 55 Filed 11/03/09 Page 1 of 2
2

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 3, 2009

cc: Ray Raimo, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00011-PB Document 55 Filed 11/03/09 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6374]

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 309 of the United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008, (“the Act”), Public Law 110-293, this is a notice of intent to establish the Global AIDS Coordinator's Expert Panel on Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV.

*Purpose:*                         The objectives and scope of activities of the Expert Panel are to provide an objective review of activities to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus, the pathogen that causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)), and to provide a report and recommendations to the Global AIDS Coordinator and to the appropriate congressional committees for scale-up of prevention of Mother-to-Child transmission prevention services.                    

*Membership:*                         The Panel shall consist of not more than fifteen members appointed by the Global AIDS Coordinator. Members of the Panel shall be drawn from governmental and private sector organizations, in accordance with the requirements under section 309 of the Act. All meetings of this Panel will be announced ahead of time by notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

Further information regarding this Panel may be obtained from Rebecca Hooper, Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 663-2440.

 Dated: September 29, 2008.

Thomas Walsh,

Deputy U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Acting Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E8-23564 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         234,838
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,978
<PP&E>                                          21,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,072
<BONDS>                                          7,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   301,766
<SALES>                                        255,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          219,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               224,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (182,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (182,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (182,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02441-REB-BNB

ISADORE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICERS GARCIA,

ROMAN YEPSHIN,

SERGEY GUREVICH,

DETECTIVE JOEY SMITH, and

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, jointly and severally,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

 ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following motions filed by the defendants on October 18, 2012:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Guidance on Service of Pleadings [Doc. #64]; and 

2. Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Access to Exhibit A Filed with Defendants’

Motion for Guidance on Service of Pleadings [Doc. #66]. 

Counsel for the defendants received from a non-party an email regarding the plaintiff’s

current address. The defendants request Level 2 restricted access to the email due to safety

concerns of the non-party. This request is granted. 

The defendants also request guidance on how papers should be served on the plaintiff in

light of the email. The plaintiff provided an address of record in his Reply to Order to Show

Cause [Doc. #55], and no further change of address has been filed. The defendants’ request for

guidance on how to serve the plaintiff is denied. 

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 70 Filed 10/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Guidance on Service of Pleadings [Doc. #64] is DENIED; 

2. Defendants’ Motion to Restrict Access to Exhibit A Filed with Defendants’ Motion

for Guidance on Service of Pleadings [Doc. #66] is GRANTED; and

3. Document #65 shall have Level 2 restricted access.

Dated October 29, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 70 Filed 10/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Date: MARCH 25, 2013 

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 

 Parties Attorney(s) 

KATHERYN KIPLING Bradley A. Levin 

Thomas G. Tasker 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Franklin D. Patterson 

 Defendant(s) 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

Court in Session: 9:40 a.m. 

Appearance of counsel. 

Discussion held on [69] Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Discovery. 

ORDERED: [69] Unopposed Motion for Leave to Conduct Additional Discovery is 

GRANTED.

Proposed Pretrial Order reviewed. 

ORDERED: Parties agree to seat a jury of eight (8), with not less than six (6) deliberating. 

Four day jury trial confirmed for May 13, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Parties allowed 20 

minutes each for voir dire. Parties to submit proposed jury instructions, 

verdict forms, and proposed voir dire on or before April 8, 2013. 

Status conference to discuss instructions set for May 2, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 

Revised exhibit lists, with Bates numbers, due at the conference. 

Case 1:11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Document 72 Filed 03/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

Discussion held on trial procedures. 

ORDERED: Reply to [66] Motion to Reconsider due by April 1, 2013. 

Discussion held on whether to inform the jury on insurance limits or not. Parties are to be 

prepared to discuss this again at the status conference on May 2, 2013. 

Pretrial Order was approved and filed. 

Court in Recess: 10:00 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:20 

Case 1:11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS Document 72 Filed 03/25/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 24(b)


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



As independent accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report
included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 for the Anuhco, Inc. 1992 Incentive Stock Plan, File No.
33-51494, the American Carriers, Inc. 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan, File No.
2-86915 and the Stock Option Agreement by and between Anuhco, Inc. and C. Ted
McCarter, effective May 31, 1995, File No. 33-62553.





                                    /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Kansas City, Missouri

April 25, 1997





                                         1
































                                         2
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1210 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, and 

Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered 

5 Children Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM 

7 EXTENDED. 

8 Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

9 and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1210 IS

1 is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 and 2009’’. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department



## 204 **KA 06-00061** PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DOUGLAS E. LEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR. OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Alex R. Renzi, J.), rendered October 5, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Lee ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 15, 2012]).

Entered: June 15, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 11, 2022

---





## Bank Branches, Domestic

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us