alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Albert R. Kuperman

v. Civil No. 08-cv-513-SM

NH Department of Corrections, et al

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $5.40 is due no later than

February 5, 2009. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

NH State Prison for Men when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 5, 2009

cc: Albert R. Kuperman

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 NH State Prison for Men, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00513-SM Document 6 Filed 01/05/09 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01964-MSK-KLM

STEPHEN T. HATCH, derivatively, on behalf of Zynex, Inc., formerly known as Zynex

Medical Holdings, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS SANDGAARD;

FRITZ G. ALLISON;

TAYLOR SIMONTON;

MARY BETH VITALE;

ZYNEX INC., a Nevada corporation, formerly known as Zynex Medical Holdings, Inc.,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 9 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 29th day of August, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 9 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Olivia NAQUIN v. Harry BOURG.

No. 2398.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1942.

C. A. Blanchard, of Donaldsonville, for appellant.

Robt. B. Butler, Jr., of Houma, for ap-pellee.

LeBLANC, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the opinion this day handed down in the companion case of Esse Blanchard v. Harry Bourg, 8 So.2d 807, the judgment appealed from in this case is hereby affirmed at the costs of the appellant herein.

DORE and OTT, JJ., concur.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1129 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition 

of governmental plan with respect to Indian tribal governments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the definition of governmental plan with respect to Indian tribal governments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Tribal Govern5 ment Equality Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PENSION PLANS OF IN7 DIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The last sentence of section 

9 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (definition 

10 of governmental plan) is amended to read as follows: ‘‘The 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 1129 IS

1 term ‘governmental plan’ includes a plan established or 

2 maintained for its employees by an Indian tribal govern3 ment (as defined in section 7701(a)(40)), a subdivision of 

4 an Indian tribal government (determined in accordance 

5 with section 7871(d)), an agency instrumentality (or sub6 division) of an Indian tribal government, or an entity es7 tablished under Federal, State, or tribal law which is whol8 ly owned or controlled by any of the foregoing.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall take effect as if included in section 906 

11 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-355-MSK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART,

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants. RESTRICTED - LEVEL 3

 

SUPPLEMENT TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR REVOCATION OF RELEASE, 

ISSUANCE OF ARREST WARRANT, AND ORDER OF DETENTION AS TO

DEFENDANT WAUNITA WEINGART (DOC. 309)

 

The United States of America, by and through United States Attorney for the District

of Colorado John F. Walsh and Assistant United States Attorneys Linda Kaufman and

Martha Paluch, hereby respectfully moves to supplement its Motion For Revocation of

Release, Issuance of Arrest Warrant, and Order of Detention as to Defendant Waunita

Weingart, filed on July 9, 2013. (Doc. 309).

1. This date, undersigned counsel were notified that the United States Marshals

Service confirmed that Defendant Waunita Weingart, along with her husband, codefendant Alois Craig Weingart, stayed at the Hilton Airport Hotel, 1960 Harbor Drive, San

Diego, California, arriving on July 4 and departing on July 9, 2013.

2. This conduct is in direct violation of the condition of Defendant Waunita

1

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 312 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Weingart’s release on bond that she obtain permission of the Court before traveling out

of the state of Colorado. (Doc. 19).

3. The United States Marshals Service is actively pursuing Fugitive Alois Craig

Weingart and intend to take him into custody pursuant to the arrest warrant issued by this

Court on July 8, 2013. However, if Defendant Waunita Weingart is found with Fugitive

Alois Craig Weingart, at this time the Marshals Service is unable to take her into custody

as well, and it is likely Defendant Waunita Weingart will flee.

4. This new information, coupled with the information stated in the

Government’s Motion For Revocation of Release, Issuance of Arrest Warrant, and Order

of Detention as to Defendant Waunita Weingart (Doc. 309), confirms that Defendant

Waunita Weingart is in violation of the conditions of her release on bond, and that a

warrant for her arrest should issue forthwith.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that this Court grant

the Government’s Motion For Revocation of Release, Issuance of Arrest Warrant, and

Order of Detention as to Defendant Waunita Weingart, filed on July 9, 2013. (Doc. 309).

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

By: s/ Linda Kaufman 

Linda Kaufman

Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 312 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
By: s/ Martha A. Paluch 

 Martha A. Paluch

Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Martha.Paluch@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Government

3

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 312 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      609,118
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               865,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                 76,414
<INVENTORY>                                  44,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          2,070,480
<PP&E>                                    1,612,043
<DEPRECIATION>                              338,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            3,624,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     2,113,569
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     24,072
<OTHER-SE>                                1,486,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              3,624,182
<SALES>                                   5,779,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          5,779,131
<CGS>                                     3,925,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             3,925,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          3,223,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,344,737)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,370,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,344,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.57)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6383]


Department of State Performance Review Board Members

    In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the 
Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the 
Department of State Performance Review Board for career Senior 
Executive Service members:
    Alexander A. Arvizu, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East 
Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of State; (Outside Member);
    Linda Jacobson, Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of the Legal 
Adviser, Department of State;
    Susan H. Swart, Chief Information Officer, Bureau of Information 
Resource Management, Department of State; (Outside Member);
    Linda S. Taglialatela, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Human 
Resources, Department of State; and
    James E. Tyckoski, Office Director, Office of Resource Planning and 
Budget, Bureau of Resource Management, Department of State.

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Harry K. Thomas, Jr.,
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human 
Resources, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E8-23570 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-89317 and 333-86809 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-51744, 33-65239, 333-12189, 333-62187, 333-84219, 333-38884, 333-68760, 333-68762, 333-110948, 333-100254, 333-100255, 333-139142, and333-139143 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of MSC.Software Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company’), and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption in 2008 of Financial Accounting Standards Board(“FASB”) Statement No. 157, *Fair Value Measurements*, adoption in 2007 of FASB Interpretation 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an**I**nterpretation of FAS 109*, *Accounting for Income Taxes*, andthe Company’s adoption in 2006 of FASB Statement No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R*, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 13, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,074
<SECURITIES>                                       327
<RECEIVABLES>                                      195
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (9)
<INVENTORY>                                        639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,396
<PP&E>                                           1,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,306
<SALES>                                          1,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,689
<CGS>                                            1,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (4)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Powell, Appellant, *v.*Scranton.

*Res adjudicata*— Quarter *sessions*— Equity—Municipalities—Annexa*tion of land.*

An order of the quarter sessions by which territory is annexed to a city, unappealed from, is a final judgment and cannot be attacked in a-collateral proceeding in equity.

Argued Feb. 21, 1910.

Appeal, No. 332,

Jan. T., 1909,.- by plaintiff, from judgment of the Superior Court, March T., .1909, No. 68, affirming decree of C. P. Lackawanna.: Co., Sept. T., 1908, No. 35, dismissing bill in equity in .case of David J. Powell'v. City of Scranton, City of Scranton School District and F. L. Hitchcock, Treasurer of City of Scranton.

Before Fell, C. J., Beown, Mesteezat, Pottee and MospHzisicee, JJ.

Affirmed.

*605Bill in equity to restrain collection of taxes. Before Edwards, P. J.

The facts appear in the following opinion of the Superior Court by Orlady, J.

This case was disposed of in the court below on a bill in equity and a demurrer thereto. After a full argument the demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff’s bill dismissed. A reversal of the judgment would mean the overruling of the decision of this court in Sheraden Borough, 34 Pa. Superior Ct. 639, which, after a further examination of the questions involved in that and this case, we are not willing to do. There is nothing to be gained in a review of the reasons for our conclusion as stated in the report of Sheraden borough case.

A further purpose of the bill is to review and reverse a decree of the court of quarter sessions of Lackawanna county, by which certain territory was annexed to the city of Scranton, which stands unappealed from, and a final judgment. The question raised here in this bill in equity was raised and was fully considered in the court of quarter sessions of Lackawanna county in that case, and it must be conceded that the court of common pleas has no authority to review and set aside the judgment of that court.

Every judgment must be conclusive until reversed. Such is the character, nature and essence of all judgments. If it be not conclusive it is not a judgment. A court must either have power to settle a given question finally and forever, so as to preclude any further inquiry upon it, or else it has no power to make any decision at all. To say that a court may determine a matter and that another court may regard the same matter afterwards as open and undetermined, is an absurdity.

The Act of April 28, 1903, P. L. 332, has been declared constitutional by this court in the Sheraden borough case, and the court of common pleas in the case now before us rightly followed the conclusion reached by this court. See further, Com. v. Parsons, 217 Pa. 435; Higgins v. Price, 36 *606Pa. Superior Ct. 215. A special discussion of the facts is not necessary in the light of these decisions. The judgment is affirmed.

*Error assigned*was the judgment of the Superior Court.

*William J. Fitzgerald,*with him *James J. Powell,*for appellant.

*W. S. Diehl,*with him *David J. Davis,*city solicitor, and *J. F. Scragg,*for appellees.

Per Curiam,

March 28, 1910:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
*Release Date: March 31, 2009*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| 20   | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | 12 | .042 | .003 | .012 | .002 | .023 |
| 8    | -3                                     | 0                                                     | 5 | 6 | .015 | -.006 | .000 | .009 | .011 |
| 54   | 5                                      | 8                                                     | 12 | 29 | .093 | .008 | .013 | .020 | .046 |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
**Exhibit32.1**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   |   |   |   |                                  |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date: November 9, 2007 |   |   |   | /s/ Clifford K. Bolen                 |   |
|                   |   |   |   |                                  |
|                   |   |   |   | Clifford K. Bolen,                    |
|                   |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                        |        |        |        |                                       |  |  |

 

1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                       NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                               September 30,
                                                                         ------------------------
                                                                            1999          1998
                                                                         ----------    ----------
<S>                                                                      <C>           <C>
Average number of common shares outstanding .........................        17,281         9,031

Common equivalent shares outstanding:

Stock options (1) ...................................................          --            --
                                                                         ----------    ----------

Total common and common equivalent shares outstanding ...............        17,281         9,031
                                                                         ==========    ==========

Net income (loss) attributed to common shareholders .................    $   (1,403)   $   (5,650)
                                                                         ==========    ==========

Loss per common share (basic and diluted) ...........................    $     (.08)   $    (0.63)
                                                                         ==========    ==========
</TABLE>

---------------

(1)      Stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
         common share as the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive.



                                      -30-