alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00344-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARMANDO CONTRERAS-GARCIA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 13, 2011 [Docket No. 12]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 4, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 4, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 13, 2011.
EXHIBIT 21     



                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     The Partnership was a general partner in JMB-40 Broad Street
Associates, an Illinois general partnership which held title to the 40
Broad Street Building prior to its sale in December, 1997.  The Partnership
was a general partner in Royal Executive Park-I, a New York general
partnership which held title to the Royal Executive Park Office Complex
prior to its sale in December, 1997.  Reference is made to the Notes for a
summary description of the terms of such partnership agreements.  The
Partnership's interest in the foregoing joint venture partnerships, and the
results of their operations are included in the financial statements of the
Partnership filed with this annual report.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending October 20, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodGATEWAY BANK & TRUST CO.                                                                                                * BranchGateway Bank & Trust Co., Elizabeth City, North Carolina, proposes to establish a branch at 2235 Access Medical Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina.Newspaper: 10/30/2007Federal Register: Not applicableROYAL BANK OF CANADA                                                                                                    FBSEARoyal Bank of Canada, Montreal, Canada, to establish a branch at Three World Financial Center, 200 Vesey Street, New York, New York.Newspaper: 11/07/2007Federal Register: Not applicableSNS PROPERTY FINANCE B.V.                                                                                               FBSEASNS Property Finance B.V., Hoevelaken, Netherlands, to establish a representative office in Reston, Virginia.Newspaper: 10/29/2007Federal Register: Not applicableWACHOVIA BANK INTERNATIONAL                                                                                             InvestmentWachovia Bank, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina, to make an investment through its subsidiary, Wachovia Bank International, Dublin, Ireland, of $256 million in Wachovia Securities International, Limited, London, England.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted), the undersigned, Charles J. Drake, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the “Periodic
Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED:
              February 5,
2009





/S/ Charles J. DrakeCharles
      J. DrakeChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer
## NO. 12

- 15

- 00126

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF T . W.,
C. W., JR., W. W., S. W. AND D. W.,

CHILDREN §
§
§ APPEAL FROM THE 392N D

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
HENDERSON COUNTY, TE XAS

MEMOR ANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM S.W. filed a pro se notice of appeal in this parental rights termination case, stating that she is “appealing all hearings from the beginning of this cause til the present.” It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdic tion over final judgments and interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har

– Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 (West 2015) (authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders). A fina l judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and
claims. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195. The district clerk has informed this court that no final judgment or other appealable order has been signed in the case. On June 24, 2015, this court sent a letter to S.W. notifying her that it appears there is no final judgment or order in the case. S.W. was warned that the appeal would be dismissed unless, on or before July 6, 2015, the information in the appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of th is court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. The July 6, 2015 deadline has passed, and the information in this appeal has not been amended to show this court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3( b). Opinion delivered July 8, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. ( PUBLISH )

1 Today we also dismissed an appeal by D.G.M., which was filed under this appellate cause number (1 2

- 15

- 00126

- CV). D.G.M. and S.W. were the only parties attempting to appeal. Therefore, this appeal has been dismissed in its entirety.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 8 , 2015

NO. 12

- 15

- 00126

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T . W., C. W., JR., W . W., S. W. AND D. W ., CHILDREN

Appeal from the 392nd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. FAM 15

- 0010

- 392) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this cou rt is without jurisdiction of the

appea l , and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision
be certif ied to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>
 
                               Stegman & Company
                          Certified Public Accountants
                                   Suite 200
                              400 East Joppa Road
                           Baltimore, Maryland  21286
                                 (410) 823-8000



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
GrandBanc, Inc.

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of GrandBanc, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, of our
report dated February 1, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of GrandBanc, Inc. and Subsidiary.



                                                        /s/ Stegman & Company
                                                            STEGMAN & COMPANY



Baltimore, Maryland
April 7, 1999
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-PO-00136-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. WASH KMUSH BUCKSKIN,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Sentencing scheduled in this matter for December 21,

2011 at 4:00 p.m. is VACATED and RESCHEDULED for December 22, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.

DATED: December 19, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge
#### Florla Barbara SUTTON, Appellant, v. Gregory Paul SUTTON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Nov. 12, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES**-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

# ** **

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for theyear ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: June 13,  2008 |                       |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|
|                      |                       |
|                      | /s/ CHRISTOPHER A.  TWOMEY |
|                      |                       | Christopher A. Twomey, |
|                      |                       | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1416 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1416

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2007

Mr. Smith (for himself, Mrs. Lincoln, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Allard, Mr. Kohl, 
  Mr. Dodd, Mr. Ensign, and Mr. Levin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 163(h)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mortgage insurance premiums 
treated as interest) is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or accrued after December 31, 2007, and to amounts 
properly allocable to any period after such date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.4

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          1997 STOCK PLAN FOR DIRECTORS
                                       OF
                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

         The 1997 Stock Plan For Directors Of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows, effective as of October 9, 1997.

         Section IV (b) of the Plan is amended by inserting at the end of the
Section the following:

"The adjustments contemplated by this Section shall be made by the Committee to
all outstanding Awards in the event of the occurrence of the `Distribution Date'
and the `Rights' becoming exercisable under the Company's Rights Agreement (the
"Rights Agreement") dated as of December 11, 1996 with First Chicago Trust
Company of New York, as Rights Agent, as amended, and any similar occurrence
under any substitute, replacement or successor to the Rights Agreement."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed this 20th day of
October, 1997.

                                           NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                                           David J. Anderson

                                           ---------------------------------
                                           By:   David J. Anderson
                                           Its:  Senior Vice President

ATTEST: Peter A. V. Huegel
        ---------------------
        Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 15

November 8, 2000


The Board of Directors
Spalding Holdings Corporation
Chicopee, Massachusetts

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Spalding  Holdings  Corporation and subsidiaries  (the "Company")
for the fiscal  periods  ended  September  30,  2000 and  October  2,  1999,  as
indicated  in our report dated  October 24, 2000;  because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on the information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended  September 30, 2000,
is incorporated by reference in  Registration  Statements No.  333-11340 on Form
S-8, No. 333-20463 on Form S-8 and No. 333-31154 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statements  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7607-7608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) 
Opportunities in the Workforce System Initiative; Solicitation for 
Grant Applications (SGA) SGA/DFA PY 07-03, Amendment Number 1

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.

ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration published a 
document in the Federal Register of January 15, 2008, announcing the 
availability of funds and solicitation for grant applications for the 
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Opportunities 
in the Workforce System Initiative. This amendment will make changes to 
the January 15 document by clarifying and correcting this Solicitation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marsha Daniels, Grants Management 
Specialist, Telephone (202) 693-3504.

Amendment

    In the Federal Register of January 15, 2008, in FR Volume 73, 
Number 10, the

[[Page 7608]]

solicitation is hereby amended with the following:
    1. This amendment is to clarify the type of Workforce Investment 
Board that is an Eligible Applicant for this Solicitation. Where an 
individual Workforce Investment Board is cited in the Solicitation it 
will be defined as a State or Local Workforce Investment Board.
    2. On page 2533, Part I.C. Use of Funds/Allowable Activities, 
remove the following text: Activities funded under this Solicitation 
must be focused on developing skills and competencies related to fields 
identified in the Attachment.
    Replace with the following text: Activities funded under this 
Solicitation must be focused on developing skills and competencies 
related to the H-1B industries and occupations identified in the 
Attachment and further limited by the list of NSF-defined STEM fields 
on page 2531, center column.
    3. On page 2542, the Attachment: H-1B Industry Sectors and 
Occupations, add the following text under the header: For the purposes 
of this Solicitation, this list is further limited by the NSF-defined 
STEM fields on page 2531.
    4. A virtual Prospective Applicant Conference was held via webinar 
for this grant competition on January 25, 2008. A recorded version can 
be viewed at: http://www.workforce3one.org/view.cfm?id=4776&info=1

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of February 2008.
Eric Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment & Training Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-2336 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32 .01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Russell Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

    /s/ Russell Smith
        ------------
        Russell Smith
   Chief Executive Officer

February 1, 2010














EXHIBIT 32 .02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auric
Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),

I, Brian Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report
 fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
 financial  condition  and result of  operations of
the Company.

      /s/ Brian Stewart
          -------------
          Brian Stewart
      Chief Financial Officer

February 1, 2010
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00010-CV

Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC

v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, 

Attorney General of the State of Texas

On Appeal from the

200th District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-19-008429

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 10, 2022
#### Cy, alias Cyrus, ADAMS v. STATE.

8 Div. 148.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

May 21, 1935.

SAMFORD, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02375-BNB

ALICE DIEHL-CAINE,

Applicant,

v.

LAURIE TAFOYA, Warden, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

Following review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, the Court has determined

that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the

case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR

8.2D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED November 21, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02375-DME Document 11 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1874-1875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-232]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-24-000]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Filing

December 31, 2007.
    Take notice that on December 21, 2007, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Rules of Practices and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.207, section 1241 of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005, EPAct of 2005 which includes the new section 219 of 
the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824s (2007), and Order No. 679, 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) filed a petition for 
declaratory order seeking the Commission to authorize transmission rate 
incentives for a new bulk power transmission project in which PG&E is 
planning to be a major participant.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public

[[Page 1875]]

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on 
the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce888b9c8d81a0a2a7a0ab9dbbbebea1bcba8ea8abbcade0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8bebdaabbb7969491969dab8d8888978a8cb89e9d8a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m., Eastern Time on January 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-232 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>