alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 03, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0241. DERRIC DESHAWN CANTRELL v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 09CR1449
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Gulf Onshore, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Dated:  May 15 2008  /s/ Jeffery Joyce  Name: Jeffery Joyce Title:  Chief Executive Officer    Dated:  May 15, 2008  /s/ Jeffery Joyce  Name: Jeffery Joyce Title:  Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 747 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1210 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 22, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered 

5 Children Act of 2007’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

S 1210 RS 

1 SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM 

2 EXTENDED. 

3 Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement 

4 and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2008 and 2009’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 747 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1210 

A BILL 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered 

children. 

MAY 22, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02391-RPM-KMT

MARVIN J. THOMAS,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Operated in Colorado as a district of public schools organized pursuant

to C.R.S.23-14-101, 

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR WHICH TO

OPPOSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

_____________________________________________________________________________

The court having reviewed the Unopposed Motion of Time for Which to Oppose Summary

Judgment of Plaintiff Marvin Thomas and having reviewed the premises orders that said motion shall be

granted; Plaintiff shall file his Brief in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment on or before

October 1, 2012.

Dated: August 31st , 2012

By the Court: 

s/ Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________ 

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02391-RPM Document 18 Filed 08/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

U.S. Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

SES Performance Review Board Chair.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all previously published lists of the PRB Chair.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This appointment is effective as of September 22, 2008.                    

Sarah J. Bonilla,

Director, Office of Human Capital Management.

[FR Doc. E8-23846 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2187

AN ACT

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make receipts collected from mineral leasing activities on

certain naval oil shale reserves available to coverenvironmental restoration, waste management,and environmental compliance costs incurred bythe United States with respect to the reserves.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2187

AN ACT

To amend title 10, United States Code, to make receipts

collected from mineral leasing activities on certain naval

oil shale reserves available to cover environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance costs incurred by the United States with respect

to the reserves.
2

•HR 2187 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF RECEIPTS FROM MINERAL LEASING AC4 TIVITIES ON CERTAIN NAVAL OIL SHALE RE5 SERVES.

6 Section 7439 of title 10, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) in subsection (f)(1), by striking the second

9 sentence; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section:

12 ‘‘(g) USE OF RECEIPTS.—(1) The Secretary of the

13 Interior may use, without further appropriation, not more

14 than $1,500,000 of the moneys covered into the Treasury

15 under subsection (f)(1) to cover the cost of any additional

16 analysis, site characterization, and geotechnical studies

17 deemed necessary by the Secretary to support environ18 mental restoration, waste management, or environmental

19 compliance with respect to Oil Shale Reserve Numbered

20 3. Upon the completion of such studies, the Secretary of

21 the Interior shall submit to Congress a report

22 containing—

23 ‘‘(A) the results and conclusions of such stud24 ies; and
3

•HR 2187 EH

1 ‘‘(B) an estimate of the total cost of the Sec2 retary’s preferred alternative to address environ3 mental restoration, waste management, and environ4 mental compliance needs at Oil Shale Reserve Num5 bered 3.

6 ‘‘(2) If the cost estimate required by paragraph

7 (1)(B) does not exceed the total of the moneys covered

8 into the Treasury under subsection (f)(1) and remaining

9 available for obligation as of the date of submission of the

10 report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior

11 may access such moneys, beginning 60 days after submis12 sion of the report and without further appropriation, to

13 cover the costs of implementing the preferred alternative

14 to address environmental restoration, waste management,

15 and environmental compliance needs at Oil Shale Reserve

16 Numbered 3. If the cost estimate exceeds such available

17 moneys, the Secretary of the Interior may only access such

18 moneys as authorized by subsequent Act of Congress.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 18,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02430-BNB

UNITED. FILE D
LUCAS DeMAESTRI, DENVER, COLONAOO SE
Plaintiff, SEP 26 2018
v. GREGORY C. LANGHAM
CLERK

VERIFACTs, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

Upon completion of the Court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, the
Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary
dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate
judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate
judge.

DATED September 26, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02430-BNB
Lucas DeMaestri
9901 Evans Ave #23D
Denver, CO 80247

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 26, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:

eputy Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02428-AP 

JAMES KLEINERT, et al., 

 Petitioners, 

v. 

KEN SALAZAR, et al., 

 Federal Respondents. 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS’ AND FEDERAL RESPONDENTS’ 

JOINT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 

 

Petitioners and Federal Respondents, through the undersigned attorneys, have 

moved the Court for clarification as to when their Joint Case Management Plan is due. 

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the joint motion is GRANTED. The parties’ Joint Case 

Management Plan shall be due twenty days after Federal Respondents’ file their answer 

or response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1). 

Dated: November 21, 2011. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/John L. Kane 

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 40 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Morris Anolik, Judgment Creditor, against Samuel Schoicket et al.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, New York County,

January 25, 1957.

*Charles E. Tally*for judgment creditor.

*Frederick 8. Dunn*for judgment debtor and third party.

Henry Silverman, J.

The narrow question presented to me at Special Term was, I think, correctly decided. The creditor describes Mr. Schoicket as general manager of the third-party corporation, and the third party describes the same person as *‘ ‘*only its general manager in charge of estimating and supervising its work.” In the context hereof the term “ general manager ” is not synonymous with the term “ managing agent ” as used in subdivision 8 of section 228 of the Civil Practice Act. Moreover, it is stated in the answering affidavit that Mr. Schoicket is not an officer of the third-party corporation and that he does not have custody and control of the books and records of the third party. Hence, any further order directed to Mr. Schoicket might prove abortive.

However, a fuller showing has been made in these papers and the creditor has also asked *“*for such other and further relief as to this court may seem just and proper.” The law is not a game of wits; the earlier practice of placing a premium upon legal niceties and technicalities has been largely discarded in favor of the modern view of attempting to accomplish substantial justice. The creditor wants the third party to produce its books, records and papers and it is entitled to that relief. Ordinarily, the creditor does not know and has no means of knowing which particular officer of a corporation has custody of its books and records, but that is no reason for denying a creditor the necessary relief. The motion is granted to the extent of directing that the third-party corporation, by its president or other officer or employee having custody of its books and records and having sufficient knowledge of their contents to testify adequately in supplementary proceedings, shall attend *507at Special Term, Part II of this court on February 14, 1957, at 11:00 a.m., and shall produce such of the books, records and papers enumerated in the order of November 23, 1956, as are relevant and germane to the subject matter of the third-party examination. Let a copy of this order be served upon counsel for the third party pursuant to rule 20 of the Buies of Civil Practice without undue delay.
#### **Exhibit 32.6**

#### ** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code), the undersigned officer of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation,(the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the amended Annual Reportof the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004(the “Report”) that:

 

1.                                            The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

2.                                            The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: June 29, 2005

 
|   | /s/ R. Herbert Hampton         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |  R. Herbert Hampton       |
|   |  Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and isnot being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
CAUSE NUMBER 03

— 15

— 00318

— CR

JAMAAL BRADLEY X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
X V. X THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
X STATE OF TEXAS X STATE OF TEXAS

APPELLANT ’S THIR D MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING

OF APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW THE APPELLANT, by and through his appointed

attorney of record, Paul M. Evans, in the above entitled and numbered

cause, and moves this Court, to grant the Appellant’s Third Motion to

Extend Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief, and, in support thereof, would

show the Court as follows:

I.

Appellant ’s Brief was due before this Court on November 23, 2015

.
A previous Motion to Extend Time was filed on September 17, 2015, and

was granted the same date. A second Motion was filed on November 2,

2015, and was granted the following date. ACCEPTED 03-15-00318-CR 8205407 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/11/2015 3:26:59 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKII.

The undersigned counsel requires more time to complete the research

of the issues presente d by the instant appeal and draft ing of the Appellant’s

Br ief. Counsel w ould hereby respectfully request the deadline be extended

to January 8 , 201 6

.
Counsel had anticipated that he would be able to complete the

Appellant’s Brief in the period falling betw een November 2 and November

23

— the date of the previous deadline and the new deadline requested in

Counsel’s previous Motion to Extend, respectively

— but personal health

issues hampered his ability to perform the labor needed to complete the task

at that ti me, and the resumption of everyday court dockets after the

Thanksgiving holiday has severely curtailed his ability to devote attention to

the instant matter.

The issues involved in the instant appeal are not complex, and

Counsel anticipates he can easily tender a completed Appellant’s Bried by

no later than January 8, 2016.

III.

This Motion is not made for purposes of delay, but so that justice

might be served.WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant respectfully

prays that this Court , upon good cause shown, grant the Appellant’s Third

Motion to Extend Time for Filing Appellant’s Brief.

Respectfully submitted, Law Office of Paul M. Evans 811 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 569

- 1418 (512) 6 92

- 8002 FAX

_/s/ Paul M. Evans

________ P AUL M. EVANS SBN 24038885 Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was delivered by facsimile unto the office of the prosecuting attorney for the State of Texas

— the Travis County District Attorney, mailing address P.O. Box 1748, Austin, TX, 78767, physical address 509 W. 1 1 th Street, Austin, TX, 78701

— on this the 11 th day of Dece mber , 201 5

.

_/s/ Paul M. Evans

________ PAUL M. EVANSCERTIFI CATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that the present document contains 456 words, all contents included.

_/s/ Paul M. Evans

________ PAUL M . EVANS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of A.M. and A.M., children. ) ___________________________________) ) A.B., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4947 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed June 5, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge. Linda C. Clark of Linda C. Clark, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Daniel A. Hoffman, Tampa, Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, Tallahassee, and Joanna Summers- 2 -

Brunell, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
#### Vernon FITTS et al. v. T. R. WALTON.

7 Div. 119.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

SAMFORD, Judge.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>
 
                               Stegman & Company
                         Certified Public Accountants
                                   Suite 200
                              400 East Joppa Road
                            Towson, Maryland  21286
                                (410) 823-4815



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
FWB Bancorporation

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of FWB Bancorporation for the year ended December 31, 1996, of our
report dated January 18, 1997, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of FWB Bancorporation and Subsidiary.


                                                        /s/ Stegman & Company
                                                       ----------------------
                                                            Stegman & Company 


Towson, Maryland
March 25, 1997
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Stephen K. Onody, state and certify that, based on my knowledge:


1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002 of Colorado
MEDtech, Inc. (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Colorado
MEDtech, Inc.


Date: September 30, 2002


/s/ Stephen K. Onody
----------------------------------
Name:  Stephen K. Onody
Title: Chief Executive Officer and
       President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Task Force on Cost Sharing of the Committee on Strategy and Budget, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# Date and Time:

 October 15, 2008 from 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.

# Subject Matter:

1. Discussion of Draft Report Recommendations.

# Status:

Open.

# Place:

This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Room 110 will be available to the public to listen to this teleconference meeting.

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (                        *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Jennifer Richards, National Science Board Office, 4201 Wilson                               ( print page 58986)                            Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                    

Ann Ferrante,

Writer-Editor.

 [FR Doc. E8-23831 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### MARGAVIO v. CAPONE et al.

No. 18350.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 15, 1946.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1946.

Writ of Certiorari Denied July 3, 1946.

Harry T. Wilkins, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Porteous, Johnson & Humphrey, of New Orleans, for defendant-appellant Joseph Capone.

Alvin R. Christovich and Wm. W. Ogden, both of New Orleans, for defendant-appel-lee New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

L. V. Landry, of New Orleans, for Board of Administrators of Charity Hospital.

*744WESTERFIELD, *Judge.*

This suit results from the same accident considered by us in Blanchard v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 25 So.2d 741. These cases were consolidated below for the purpose of trial and, in this Court, for the purpose of argument. The plaintiff, Miss Margavio, was a passenger in the bus which collided with the street car, as was Miss Blanchard, the plaintiff in the other case.

For the reasons assigned in the Blanchard case, we find the bus'driver to be solely responsible for the injuries suffered by plaintiff. There is a stipulation in the record to the effect that should the Court determine that Miss Margavio was entitled to a judgment the amount of damages due her should be $400. It is also stipulated that there should be a judgment in favor of the Board of Administrators of the Charity Hospital, in the sum of $9.50. There was judgment below in accordance with these stipulations, consequently, and

For the reasons assigned in Blanchard v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 25 So.2d 741, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.