alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.5**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-12130 on Form F-3, No. 333-12780 and 333-12802 on Form S-8 and No. 333-188525 on Form F-10 and to the use of our reports dated March 6, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements of BCE Inc. which expresses an unmodified opinion and includes an Emphasis of Matter paragraph relating to the retrospective adoption of new accounting standards and the effectiveness of BCE Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, and to such reports appearing in and being incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of BCE Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013.

*(signed) Deloitte LLP1*

Montréal, Canada March 12, 2014

______________________________

1 CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A104644

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02404-MSK

EDWARD MONTOUR,

Petitioner,

v.

TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Petitioner’s Ex Parte Motion to Proceed In

Forma Pauperis (# 34). Petitioner alleges in the motion that he lacks sufficient funds to pay the

filing fee to proceed on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The

Court notes that the appellate filing fee was paid on January 5, 2012. Therefore, the motion to

proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Petitioner’s Ex Parte Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (# 34) is

DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED this 14th day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02404-MSK Document 41 Filed 02/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART,

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants.

ORDER

The Court has for consideration the government’s Motion to Restrict Document,

wherein the government asks this Court to restrict said document, the Brief in Support to

that Motion, and any order resulting from said document. Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED that Document, the Brief in Support to this Motion, and any order issued

by this Court with regard to said document are hereby restricted until further Order of the

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED on this day of ________, 2013.

 

THE HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 307-1 filed 07/09/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,082
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                     902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         76,737
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,217
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,515
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,564
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                       704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 3.2**

 

**CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**AMENDED ANDRESTATED**

**CERTIFICATEOF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**INTRAWARE,INC.**

(Pursuant to Section 242of the

General Corporation Law ofthe State of Delaware)

 

Peter H. Jackson and John J. Moss each herebycertifies:

 

1.               They are, respectively, (a) theChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, and (b) Secretary ofIntraware, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “General Corporation Law”);

 

2.               Article 4 of the Company’s Amended andRestated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is to be amended to add thefollowing immediately after the present first paragraph thereof (which setsforth the number and par value of the Company’s authorized capital stock, noneof which is being amended):

 

“Eachten (10) shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock issued and outstandingas of 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on September 26, 2005, the effectivedate of a reverse stock split (the “Split Effective Date”), shall be automaticallychanged and reclassified, as of the Split Effective Date and without furtheraction, into one (1) fully paid and nonassessable share of the Corporation’sCommon Stock. There shall be no fractional shares issued. A holder of record ofCommon Stock on the Split Effective Date who would otherwise be entitled to afraction of a share shall, in lieu thereof, be entitled to receive a cashpayment in an amount equal to the fraction to which the stockholder wouldotherwise be entitled multiplied by the net per share proceeds earned by theCorporation upon the sale of a number of shares of its Common Stock equal tothe aggregate of the fractional shares that otherwise would have resulted dueto the reverse stock split.”

 

3.               This Certificate of Amendment to the Amendedand Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted and declaredadvisable by the Board of Directors of this Corporation in accordance withSections 242 of the General Corporation Law.

 

4.               This Certificate of Amendment to the Amendedand Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly approved, in accordancewith Section 242 of the General Corporation Law, by vote of the holders ofa majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executedthis Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation on this 23 day of September, 2005.

 
|             | /s/ Peter H. Jackson                            |   |
|------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             | Peter H. Jackson                                |
|             | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|             |                                            |
| /s/ John J. Moss |                                            |   |
| John J. Moss     |                                            |
| Secretary        |                                            |
|                  |                                                 |        |  |

 

----
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00369-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ADRIAN RAMIREZ-CENTENO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition was filed on November 28, 2011. A Change of Plea hearing

is set for December 9, 2011, at 3:30 p.m.. Counsel for the parties shall deliver or email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to Judge

Blackburn’s chambers AND to the Probation Department no later than 48 hours

before the change of plea hearing date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the documents

are not timely submitted, the hearing will be vacated. There will be no exceptions to this

policy. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall then bring with them an original and one

(1) copy of the plea agreement and the statement in advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the appearance of the defendant for the Change

of Plea Hearing.

Dated: November 28, 2011

Case 1:11-cr-00369-REB Document 12 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10906

Summary Calendar

 

VAN LEE BREWER ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

VAN LEE BREWER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

B. WILKINSON ET AL.,

Defantants,

B. WILKINSON, Mail Room Clerk,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Institutional Division, CYNTHIA CALLAWAY,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:91-CV-143

--------------------

August 3, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 On February 26, 1996, Van Lee Brewer (TDCJ # 527494) filed a

timely notice of appeal of a judgment in favor of the defendants

following a jury trial of his civil rights complaint. 

Subsequently, a member of this court directed that in order to 
No. 98-10906

-2-

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal, Brewer must comply

with the requirements of the Prison Litigation and Reform Act

(PLRA). Concluding that Brewer had failed to comply with such

order, the district court entered an order denying Brewer IFP

status. The clerk of this court entered an order dismissing the

appeal for want of prosecution. Brewer filed in the district

court a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief of its judgment

denying him IFP status. It is from the district court’s denial

of such motion that Brewer now appeals.

 Brewer contends that the district court should have granted

him Rule 60(b) relief for a myriad of reasons. He also argues

that the PLRA did not apply to his appeal. 

 Brewer’s argument that the PLRA is inapplicable in this case

is without merit. See Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional

Facility, 105 F.3d 972, 973-74 (5th Cir. 1997). Moreover, none

of the various arguments advanced by Brewer establishes that the

district court abused its discretion by denying his Rule 60(b)

motion. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Liljeberg Enter., 38 F.3d

10404, 1408 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment

of the district court.

 AFFIRMED.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

The State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00214

- CR v.

Leon Gearhart, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2018

- 1359 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, State of Texas, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 26, 2019
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Cler k
#### PRICE et al. v. TOWN OF RUSTON.

No. 4537.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Jan. 3, 1933.

For former opinions, see 148 So. 512 and 151 So. 133.

Barksdale, Warren & Barksdale, of Ruston, for appellant.

Elder & Elder, of Ruston, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is the second application for rehearing in this case. We granted one rehearing on the application of the appellant. 151 So. 133. Our judgment on the rehearing did not reserve to'either patty the right to make a second application, and hence we are powerless to grant the present application, made by the appellees. Luckett *&*Hunter v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co., 161 La. 175, 108 So. 405.

The application must therefore be dismissed.
#### Betty B. Goergen, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 33485.)

Court of Claims,

March 29, 1957.

*Paul R. Jones*for claimant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Stanley V. Scott*of counsel), for defendant.

Russell G. Hunt, J.

The claimant has moved to examine before trial two employees of the State upon the matters set forth in the notice of motion (Court of Claims Act, § 17, subd. 2). The claim alleges that upon the representations of the State’s representatives concerning the record, history and character of a parolee from Great Meadow Prison, the claimant engaged the latter as a farm laborer upon her farm; that subsequently the parolee violently assaulted her; that the representations were false and that the State and its employees knew they were false at the time they were made, and, she sustained severe injuries for which she now seeks damages.

The claimant desires to examine the parole officers who placed the parolee with her and to inspect the criminal record and all other records relating to him in the Correction Department and in the Board of Parole.

The claimant is entitled to examine the parole officers, Leonard R. Witt and William A. Fletcher, respecting the facts and circumstances set forth in the notice of motion.

Discovery and inspection of the records of the Board of Parole cannot be compelled pursuant to section 324 of the Civil Practice Act; it is only the limited inspection thereof, permitted by section 296, that will be ordered *(Glass*v. *State of New York,*5 Misc 2d 127). The claimant is entitled to inspect the records of the Correction Department concerning the parolee pursuant to section 15-a of the Correction Law.

*799The examination before trial shall be held at a time and place to be agreed upon, and, in the absence of agreement, the time and place will be set in the order.

Submit order in accordance with the foregoing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INKTOMI
CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          37,379
<SECURITIES>                                    17,059
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,121
<PP&E>                                          13,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,172
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,627)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, Gary W. Rada, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 29, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: December 12, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary W. Rada                     
|Gary W. Rada                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer



33
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-88124, 33-88180, 333-09623, 333-39060, 333-39064, 333-39290, 333-61588, 333-101444, 333-100716, 333-104659, 333-117909, and 333-117910 on Form S-8 of our report dated January 14, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Shuffle Master, Inc. and
subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of recent provisions for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes on November 1, 2007), and of our report dated January 14, 2010, relating to internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shuffle Master, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 2009.







/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Las Vegas, Nevada


January 14, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jacques Mot
---------------------------
Jacques Mot
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

January 23, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 29, 2014





/s/ HAIM TSUFF


HAIM TSUFF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO REGISTRANT AND WILL BE RETAINED BY REGISTRANT AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS

CLIFFORD E. LEWIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CLINIC DIRECTOR ALLRED,

JOHN DOE(S) CLINIC DIRECTORS, and

JOHN DOE(S),

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in

accordance with the text-only Order Adopting Report and Recommendations of the

United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. #66] entered by Chief Judge Marcia S.

Krieger on January 16, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig B.

Shaffer is ADOPTED;

2. That Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider [#43] is DENIED;

3. That Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [ #52] is DENIED;

4. That Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#42] is GRANTED;

5. That the this civil action is dismissed for failure to state a claim to which

relief can be granted; and 

6. That the case is closed.

Case 1:11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS Document 67 Filed 01/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 17th day of January, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS Document 67 Filed 01/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert C. Fitting, the CEO of Radyne ComStream Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report
of Radyne ComStream Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Amendment No. 1 fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Radyne ComStream Inc.

Dated: May 5, 2003

| |  |                                         
| |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Robert C. Fitting                   
| |  |                                         
| |  | Robert C. FittingChief Executive Officer

15