alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2381]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 7461]]



FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 630

RIN 3052-AC40


Disclosure to Investors in System-Wide and Consolidated Bank Debt 
Obligations of the Farm Credit System; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency), through the 
FCA Board (Board), issued a direct final rule with opportunity for 
comment under part 630 on November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64129) amending our 
regulation on the external auditor's assessment of internal control 
over financial reporting concerning the System-wide annual report to 
investors. The opportunity for comment expired on December 17, 2007. 
The FCA received no comments and therefore, the direct final rule 
becomes effective without change. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, 
the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of 
publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses 
of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of 
Congress, the effective date of the regulations is January 31, 2008.

DATES: Effective Date: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 630 
published on November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64129) is effective January 31, 
2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wade Wynn, Policy Analyst, Office of Regulatory Policy, Farm Credit 
Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4414, TTY (703) 
883-4434
     or
Laura McFarland, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY 
(703) 883-4020.

    Authority: (12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10)).

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
 [FR Doc. E8-2381 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Raymond P. Moore

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02381-RM-KLM

SALVADOR MAGLUTA,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

AMBER NELSON, Acting Regional Director of the North Central Region,

CHARLES DANIELS, Warden at USP Florence,

MONICA S. WETZEL, Former Warden at FDC Miami,

LOUIS MILUSNIC, Assistant Warden at USP Florence,

JOHNSON (FNU), Assistant Warden at USP Florence,

G.T. KAPUSTA, Former Assistant Warden at FDC Miami,

BANUELOS (FNU), Lieutenant at USP Florence,

T. JAVERNICK, Case Manager Coordinator (CMC) at Florence Federal Complex,

ANDY FENLON, Counselor at ADX Florence,

MASSEY (FNU), Officer at USP Florence,

DUVAL (FNU), Officer at USP Florence,

STEGAL (FNU), Officer at USP Florence, and

JOHN DOES 1-9 TO BE IDENTIFIED LATER,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER 

CONVERTING AUGUST 7, 2013 HEARING TO STATUS CONFERENCE

(ECF NO. 118)

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Expedited Motion to Vacate the 

August 7th Hearing (“Motion”) (ECF No. 122). Upon consideration of the Motion and other 

papers filed before this Court, it is 

Case 1:11-cv-02381-RM-KLM Document 123 Filed 07/31/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that the August 7, 2013 hearing is hereby converted to a status conference. 

The status conference will be held at the same date, time, and place as previously set for the 

hearing: Wednesday, August 7, 2013, commencing at 9:00 a.m. before Judge Raymond P. 

Moore in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A601, 6th Floor, 901 19th Street, Denver, 

Colorado. 

DATED this 31st day of July, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________

RAYMOND P. MOORE

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02381-RM-KLM Document 123 Filed 07/31/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20254

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

JOE R. WALKER,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

L.A. MASTERS, Dr.,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-94-3503

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Because no specified federal statute of limitations exists

for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suits, federal courts borrow the forum

state's general or residual personal injury limitations period. 

Rodriguez v. Holmes, 963 F.2d 799, 803 (5th Cir. 1992). In

Texas, the applicable period is two years. Id. Federal courts

also apply the state's tolling provisions to statutory

limitations periods. Id. 
No. 95-20254

-2-

Although state law controls the limitations period for 

§ 1983 claims, federal law determines when a cause of action

accrues. Brummett v. Camble, 946 F.2d 1178, 1184 (5th Cir.

1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 2323 (1992). Under the federal

standard, the statute of limitations begins to run from the

moment the plaintiff knows or has reason to know that he has been

injured and who has inflicted the injury. Moore v. McDonald, 30

F.3d 616, 620-21 (5th Cir. 1994).

Under the federal accrual standard, Joe R. Walker knew or

should have known of his alleged constitutional injuries and the

person responsible for it by May 5, 1991, when Masters modified

Walker's medical records to reflect a new medical classification

that reflected an ability by Walker to do field duty. Walker's

attempts to change this modification or obtain an explanation

adequately demonstrates his awareness of his injury and the

person who was responsible for it. Walker's ignorance of a

possible legal remedy did not toll the running of the limitations

period. See Longoria v. Bay City, 779 F.2d 1136, 1139 (5th Cir.

1986).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raymond F. Kunzmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Raymond F. Kunzmann
-----------------------------
Raymond F. Kunzmann
Chief Financial Officer
February 3, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF JAMES G. 

KLINGENSMITH, DECEASED

PETITION OF: JOSEPH G. 

KLINGENSMITH AND JOHN A. 

KLINGENSMITH

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 195 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I,
Michael S. Shore, certify that:
 
 1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Streicher Mobile
      Fueling, Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.
 
 5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
      to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
February 14, 2005
 
 /s/
Michael S. Shore
 Michael
S. Shore
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
  
 25
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1310

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
extension of increased payments for ground ambulance services under the 
                           Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2007

  Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Lott, and Mr. Conrad) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
extension of increased payments for ground ambulance services under the 
                           Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Ambulance Payment Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INCREASED MEDICARE PAYMENTS FOR GROUND AMBULANCE 
              SERVICES.

    Section 1834(l)(13) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(l)(13)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), in the heading, by striking ``In 
        general'' and inserting ``For the second half of 2004 and for 
        2005 and 2006'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C);
            (3) by inserting the following after subparagraph (A):
                    ``(B) For 2008 and 2009.--After computing the rates 
                with respect to ground ambulance services under the 
                other applicable provisions of this subsection, in the 
                case of such services furnished on or after January 1, 
                2008, and before January 1, 2010, the fee schedule 
                established under this section shall provide that the 
                rate for the service otherwise established, after 
                application of any increase under paragraphs (11) and 
                (12), shall be increased by 5 percent.''; and
            (4) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated by paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Application of 
                increased payments after 2006'' and inserting ``No 
                effect on subsequent periods''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                sentence: ``The increased payments under subparagraph 
                (B) shall not be taken into account in calculating 
                payments for services furnished after the period 
                specified in such subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### HARRY R. SCHLOSSBACH, TRADING AS A. SCHLOSSBACH & SON AGENCY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Submitted October 7, 1947

Decided November 7, 1947.

Before Justices Bodine, Heher and Wachenfeld.

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Henry K. Golenbock.*

For the defendant-respondent, *Anschelewitz & Barr.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

This is an action for the recovery of commissions on a contract which gave to the plaintiff an exclusive contract to sell for a period of thirty days No. 710 Grassmere Avenue in the Borough of Interlaken.

The decision turns on whether an agreement of sale was executed within the period of the agency.

*296The language of the agreement, so far as pertinent, is as follows: “I agree to pay the A. Schlossbaeh *&*Son Agency as brokerage commission of Eive per cent (5%) on the amount of sale of the above property. Said commission to be due and payable when Agreement of Sale is ezecuted. In consideration of your efforts to procure a purchaser I do hereby give the said A. Schlossbaeh & Son Agency *exclusive*and irrevocable authorization to sell the above described property for a period of thirty days from the date hereof.”

On June 27th, before the authorization had expired, the plaintiff tendered to the defendant a check for the sum of $200 on behalf of and made by a prospective buyer. He also handed to the defendant a receipt for him to sign in the following language: “Eeceived from A. Schlossbaeh & Son Agency check in the sum of $200.00 from the Bradley Beach Title & Mortgage Co., Inc., as a deposit and part of purchase price on an offer to purchase the property situated at 710 Grassmere Avenue, Interlaken, New Jersey, for the sum of $10,500.00. Balance to be paid as follows:

> “$800.00 on signing of contracts on or before July 2, 1945.

> “Balance in cash above the present mortgage in the amount of approximately $5,650.00 held-by A. B. G. Corporation. Warranty Deed to be given on passing of Title.

> “This offer is made subject to the conditions of an exclusive listing card dated June 2, 1945, with possession in thirty days.”

The receipt was never signed. The alleged prospective purchaser was a corporation owned and controlled by the plaintiff.

The defendant insisted before the expiration date that a signed agreement must be tendered to him. This was not done.

The trial court nonsuited the plaintiff for the reason that he had not earned his commission since he had never tendered an executed agreement of sale. The learned trial judge ruled properly that there was no agreement of sale executed and the tender was merely of the agent’s check.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors 

Heritage Bankshares, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inregistration statements No. 333-112214 on Form S-8 of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated September 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

Norfolk, Virginia 

November 9, 2006 

 

86
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Caldarone, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Calton, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
     covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.

Date: March 14, 2007


/s/ Anthony J. Caldarone
-----------------------------------------------
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02313-MSK-MJW

LARRY L. WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 11th day of January, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02313-MSK-MJW Document 21 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ JEFFREY W. TAYLOR                    
|                      |  | Jeffrey W. Taylor Chief Executive
Officer
|                      | 
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ DANIEL C. STEVENS                    
|                      |  | Daniel C. Stevens Chief Financial
Officer



54