alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,093-01

EX PARTE ANTHONY MOLINA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR16001830-F(1) IN THE 214TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM NUECES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation, third-degree deadly conduct,

misdemeanor deadly conduct, and evading arrest. He was sentenced to imprisonment for one term

of twenty years, two terms of ten years, and one term of one year. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals

affirmed the judgment of conviction in his burglary case. Molina v. State, No. 13-17-00171-CR

(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 28, 2018) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that the State engaged in misconduct, the trial court erred, and trial and

appellate counsel were ineffective. On December 18, 2019, his application was denied in part and
2

dismissed in part. Before disposing of his application, we ordered the Nueces County District Clerk

to respond to Applicant’s claim that he was charged $23.00 for the State’s response to his

application. On October 30, 2019, we received her response. She stated that Applicant was

inadvertently charged $23.00 for the State’s response and that he would be refunded the $23.00. In

a letter dated July 20, 2020, Applicant notified this Court that he had not yet received a refund,

despite sending a request in March to the District Clerk. In late August, the District Clerk advised

General Counsel of this Court that her office would be sending Applicant a check and that she would

send this Court documentation that she had done so. As of today, we have not received

documentation. Accordingly, we withdraw our previous disposition of this application and orderthe

District Clerk to send to this Court documentation that Applicant was refunded $23.00. She shall

respond within ten days of the date of this order.

Filed: February 24, 2021 

Do not publish
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending July 4, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6191
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-80-14) Submitted: April 23, 1996 Decided: May 7, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Alvin Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his motions to correct the record and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams , No. CR-80-14 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995 & Jan. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Paul ANDERSON, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and The Workmen’s Compensation Board of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 21, 1972.

*634Robert T. Caldwell, Caldwell, Vanant-werp, Welch & Hughes, Ashland, for appellant.

Stanley R. Hogg, Creech & Hogg, Ash-land, John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., Frankfort, J. Keller Whitaker, Workmen’s Compensation Board, Frankfort, for appel-lees.

VANCE, Commissioner.

In this workmen’s compensation case the Board awarded Paul Anderson, an employee of Armco Steel Corporation, benefits for temporary total disability at the rate of $47.00 per week for a period of seventeen weeks plus benefits for a five-percent permanent partial disability at the rate of $2.15 per week for four-hundred weeks and for medical expenses.

Armco petitioned for a review in the circuit court. The award for temporary total disability and reimbursement of medical expenses was affirmed but that portion of the award which allowed benefits for permanent partial disability was set aside.

From the judgment of the circuit court Armco has appealed and Anderson has filed a cross-appeal.

KRS 342.290 provides:

> “Where an amount sufficient under KRS 21.060 to authorize an appeal to the Court of Appeals is involved, the judgment of the circuit court shall be subject to appeal to the Court of Appeals. * * **»*

The jurisdictional amount for an appeal as a matter of right as set forth in KRS 21.060 is $2,500.00. The record in this case does not establish the jurisdictional amount.

The appeal involves the liability of Arm-co for benefits of $47.00 per week for seventeen weeks of temporary total disability and reimbursement of medical expenses which were estimated by the employee to be $400.00. The cross-appeal involves liability of the employer for benefits for permanent partial disability of $2.15 per week for four-hundred weeks.

The total amount involved in both the appeal and cross-appeal is less than $2,500.00. There was no motion for appeal.

The appeal and the cross-appeal are each dismissed.

All concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date:  August 13, 2003                             /s/ Stephen D. Rubin
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                     Stephen D. Rubin,
                                                         President
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001024339
<NAME> CREDIT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,363,555
<SECURITIES>                                 2,614,137
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,848,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (340,266)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,655,984
<PP&E>                                      12,008,453
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,798,167)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,678,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,188,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,614
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,284,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,678,451
<SALES>                                      1,080,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,533,927
<CGS>                                        1,324,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,131,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,153,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             219,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (530,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (530,810)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (530,810)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
Order filed July 22, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00408

- CV

____________ GIOVANNY LAGUAN , Appellant

V. R.D. PARIKH, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No . 14

- CCV

- 052722



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 27, 2014

. To date, the filing fee of $19 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $1 9 5.00 to the Clerk of this court on or before August 6, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellantfails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2005-N-0098] (formerly Docket No. 2005N-0349)

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Survey of Current Manufacturing Practices in the Food Industry” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 8, 2007 (72 FR 26132), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0628. The approval expires on August 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain*.                

Dated: September 29, 2008.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.

[FR Doc. E8-23606 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2008, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

*The agenda will include the following:*                     Various IRS issues.                 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E8-23625 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
| (1)    | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/ William      Hartman                                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| William      Hartman                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Title:      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Date:      August 13, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02416-CMA-MEH

TERRY BACHMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RECEIVABLES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, LLC,

a Washington limited liability company,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the

Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. # 11) signed by the attorneys for the

parties hereto, it is

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay

his or its own attorney’s fees and costs.

DATED: December 13 , 2011

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02416-CMA-MEH Document 12 Filed 12/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, William
Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:
 (1)
    such
      Form 10QSB of ZAP for the three months ended March 31, 2005, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the three months
      ended March 31, 2005,fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of ZAP .
 
 
 ****Date: May 13,2005
    By:
    /s/ William
  HartmanWilliam HartmanChief Financial
      Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1338 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a twoyear moratorium on certain Medicare physician payment reductions for 

imaging services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. SMITH, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. COLLINS, 

Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. KOHL, Mr. COLEMAN, Mr. CASEY, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. BURR, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. 

HARKIN, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a two-year moratorium on certain Medicare physician 

payment reductions for imaging services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Medicare 

5 Imaging Act of 2007’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 1338 IS

1 SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN MEDICARE 

2 PHYSICIAN PAYMENT REDUCTIONS FOR IM3 AGING SERVICES. 

4 (a) MORATORIUM.—No payment adjustment shall be 

5 made under subsections (b)(4)(A) or (c)(2)(B)(v)(II) of 

6 section 1848 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1395w–4) during the 2-year period beginning on the date 

8 of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (b) GAO STUDY AND REPORT ON IMAGING SERVICES

10 FURNISHED UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.— 

11 (1) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the 

12 United States shall conduct a comprehensive study 

13 on imaging services furnished under the Medicare 

14 program. 

15 (2) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the 

16 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller Gen17 eral shall submit to Congress and the Secretary of 

18 Health and Human Services a report on the findings 

19 and conclusions of the study conducted under para20 graph (1) together with recommendations for such 

21 legislation and administrative actions as the Comp22 troller General considers appropriate. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23**

# ** **

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued ourreports dated June 10, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements of Arctic Cat Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K and internal control over financial reporting for the year endedMarch 31, 2008.  We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Arctic Cat Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-37065, effective October 1,1990, File No. 33-69916, effective October 4, 1993, File No. 33-97244,effective September 22, 1995 and File No. 333-99253, effective September 6,2002).

 

 

/s/GRANT THORNTONLLP

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

June 10, 2008

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Tina Thuy Troung v. Hoa Hiep Hoang

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00296

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 54609

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Tina Thuy Troung, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss, but this motion is not filed by counsel of record, Marivonne R. Essex, but is instead filed by Gary Michael Block,

who claims that he is no w appellant’s counsel. Block attache s an order signed by the trial court on April 22, 2022, granting Essex’s motion to withdraw. Block also attaches a notice of

appearance.

Rule 6.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that if an attorney is substituting for a withdrawing atto rney, the motion to withdraw of the withdrawing attorney must state the substitute attorney’s name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, and State Bar

identification number. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(d). Essex has not complied with this rule.

Ac cordingly, the Court is unable to consider the motion to dismiss filed by Block until Essex has filed a motion in compliance with Rule 6.5(d). This motion shall be filed within 5 days of the date

of this order.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Richard Hightower

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ May 3, 2022

___