alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(i)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In
connection with the Annual Report of A.G. Edwards, Inc. (the Registrant) on
Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2006, hereof (the Report), I, Robert L.
Bagby, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, and                                  
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Registrant.
| |    

|            | A.G.
      EDWARDS, INC.
|----------- | ------------------------
|           
|May 5, 2006 | By:                     
|            |                         
|            |                         
|            |                         

____________________

|* | A signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and
      will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Bennie Paul Lewis III v. Alexis Brittany Lewis

Appellate case number: 01-19-00857-CV

Trial court case number: 14-FD-1399

Trial court: County Court at Law No 1 of Galveston County

The Court issued an order on July 7, 2020 threatening dismissal for lack of jurisdiction 

because the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law appeared to be untimely filed. 

However, the Court has discovered that the request for findings and conclusions was timely filed 

and therefore the notice of appeal filed on November 4, 2020 was timely filed. 

The Court withdraws the order of July 7, 2020. Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days of 

the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Peter Kelly_________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 22, 2020____
#### Bubb *v.*Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company, Appellant.

Argued Oct. 9, 1914.

Appeal, No. 55, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Beaver Co., June T., 1912, No. 231, on verdict for plaintiff in case of O. M. Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company.

Before Fell, C. J., Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

*232Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Holt, P. J.

Verdict for plaintiff for $12,000 which the court subsequently reduced to $10,000, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was iri refusing a new trial.

*J. Sharp Wilson,*with him *Frank E. Reader,*for appellant.

*J. H. Cunningham,*with him *Anderson & Lamb,*for appellee.

January 2, 1915:

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff in this case was injured while a passenger in the defendant’s car, in the same accident in which the plaintiff in Dunlap v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company was injured. In that case the opinion of the court has been filed. The only question raised by the assignments is whether there was error in refusing a new trial on the ground that the verdict was excessive. For the reasons stated in the opinion referred to, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 6 Diffusion Indexes of Industrial Production  Year
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.One Month Earlier2011
52.6
51.0
60.3
46.2
54.8
51.3
57.7
53.8
56.1
56.7
50.3
63.52012
62.2
64.4
46.8
63.8
54.2
58.3
52.2
43.6
53.2
48.4
71.2
61.92013
52.9
61.4
46.0
47.8
56.1Three Months Earlier2011
59.6
58.3
61.5
50.3
54.5
49.0
53.8
53.8
58.3
60.6
61.5
61.52012
66.7
74.0
61.9
58.7
51.0
61.9
54.5
51.3
47.4
42.3
62.5
63.82013
66.3
64.4
53.4
49.4
45.5Six Months Earlier2011
58.0
56.1
62.2
58.7
59.3
53.8
56.1
54.2
51.9
61.9
58.0
63.52012
71.5
71.5
65.7
65.4
64.4
60.3
58.7
53.8
59.0
51.9
55.1
59.92013
57.1
67.0
63.1
64.1
55.4      Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS 

(Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-2395, 11-cv-2396 and 11-cv-2397)

ANA ALICIA ORTEGA,

KELLY BOREN,

KRISTAL CARILLO and

SHARELLE C. THOMAS,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipality,

OFFICER RICKY NIXON, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER KEVIN DEVINE, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER JOHN DOE ONE, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity, and

OFFICER JOHN DOE TWO, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City and County of Denver’s

Unopposed Motion for Consolidation filed September 19, 2011 (ECF No. 9). Pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.5E, this Court finds that the actions

listed below involve common questions of law or fact, including common parties and

common claims. Furthermore, the Court finds that consolidation of these cases will

avoid unnecessary costs and delays, and promote the efficient administration of justice. 

Case 1:11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS Document 12 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

As required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1A, approval for consolidation from Chief

U.S. District Judge Wiley Y. Daniel has been granted. Accordingly, the Court having

reviewed and considered the Unopposed Motion and the file, and being otherwise fully

advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Consolidation is GRANTED. The following

actions are consolidated with the instant action for all purposes, and all future filings in

any of these actions shall contain the caption as set forth above and shall be docketed

under Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS:

1. 11-cv-2395-CMA-CBS (Kelly Boren v. City and County of Denver, et. al)

2. 11-cv-2396-DME-MEH (Kristal Carrillo v. City and County of Denver, et.

al); and

3. 11-cv-2397-MSK-MEH (Sharelle C. Thomas v. City and County of Denver,

et al.).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer will be

the sole referral Magistrate Judge in the Consolidated Action.

Dated this 3rd day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS Document 12 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7171

PAMELA J. ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
JEFFERY DILLMAN, Assistant Warden, Operations, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women; ROBERT ARMSTRONG, Institutional Investigator, Fluvanna Correctional Center for women; PATRICIA HUFFMAN, Warde n, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women; MELISSA HOUCHENS, inmate Hearings Officer, FCCW, sued in official and individual capacity; PAUL RICE, Treatment Program Supervisor, FCCW, sued in his official and individual capacities; KIM WARE, Secretary, sued in her official and individual capacity; TRACY MEYERHOFFER, Grievance Coordinator and Human Rights Advocate, FCCW, sued in official and individual capacities; E. R. BARRACK, Representative, Investigative Unit of DOC Internal Affairs, sued in his official and individual capacities; LAURA ANDERSON, Acting Principal of Department of Correctional Education, sued in her official and individual capacities; COURTNEY DAVIS, Counselor, sued in her official and individual capacities; DONNA ANDERSON, Unit Manager, sued in her official and individual capacities; LARRY HUFFMAN, Regional Director, DOC’s Northern Regional Office #2; DEWEY JENNINGS, Officer, Operation, FCCW; DEREK ANDERSON, Major, Heal of Security, FCCW, Defendants - Appellees.23 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-768-7)
Submitted: January 31, 2003 Decided: February 14, 2003
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. SeeAnderson v. Dillman , No. CA01-768-7 (W.D. Va. July 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.4 AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10433

USDC No. 5:94-CR-069

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHONNAS J. EICKE,

 Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

----------------------

August 15, 1995

Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1987). In this criminal proceeding, the defendant has filed

a notice of appeal from the district court's determination that

he is competent to stand trial. Federal appellate courts have

jurisdiction over appeals only from (1) final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291; (2) orders that are deemed final due to jurisprudential

exception or that have been properly certified as final pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); and (3) interlocutory orders that fall

into specific classes, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), or that have been

properly certified for appeal by the district court, 28 U.S.C.
O R D E R 

No. 95-10433

-2-

§ 1292(b). See Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., 849 F.2d 955, 957

(5th Cir. 1988); Save the Bay, Inc. v. United States Army, 639

F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir. 1981). A decision is final when it

"ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the

court to do but execute the judgment." Coopers & Lybrand v.

Livesay, 437 U.S. 463, 467 (1978) (internal quotations and

citation omitted). The district court has not entered a final or

otherwise appealable order in this case, and we can discern no

basis for appellate jurisdiction. Thus, the motion for

transcripts is DENIED as moot and the appeal is DISMISSED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40404 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JESUS VALDEZ, also known as Chewy, also known as Chuy

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 800

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Valdez has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Valdez ’s motion to file an out of time response is GRANTED . We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein , as well as Valdez ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 14, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40404 Document: 00514956317 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/14/2019No. 18

- 40404

2 that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40404 Document: 00514956317 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/14/2019
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1103

___________ Romie Grady, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. D. Cross, Lt., East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; J. A. Greer, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, * ADC; C. M. Harris, C. P. L. Officer, * East Arkansas Regional Unit; K. Duke, * CO-I, East Arkansas Regional Unit, * ADC; Pickett, CO-I, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Weathers, CO-I, * East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; - * Evans, Grievance Officer, East * Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; * Juanita Mathis, Hearing Officer, East * Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; F. * Walls, Assistant Warden, East Arkansas * Regional Unit, ADC; Larry Norris, * Director, Arkansas Department of * Correction, * * Appellees.

___________ Submitted: September 24, 2003 Filed: October 6, 2003

___________1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2- Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Romie Grady brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison and correction officials alleging that he was assaulted by prison officials in retaliation for filing grievances, and that correction officials failed to investigate the assault. Prior to service, the district court 1 dismissed the action because Mr. Grady had failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
We agree that dismissal was proper: Mr. Grady did not file and exhaust a grievance against Mr. Norris, a named defendant, before commencing this action. See42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Porter v. Nussle , 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002) (administrative exhaustion is prerequisite to § 1983 prison-conditions lawsuit even if administrative remedies are not plain, speedy, and effective, and relief inmate seeks is not available); Johnson v. Jones , Nos. 02-3775 & 02-3983, 2003 WL 21982179, at *2 (8th Cir. Aug. 2, 2003) (inmate must exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court); Graves v. Norris , 218 F.3d 884, 885-86 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (dismissal proper where at least some of plaintiff’s claims were unexhausted). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, and deny all pending motions.

______________________________
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0001023877
<NAME>                       Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1992
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-1992
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-1992
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       37
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                           20
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         37
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         7
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (7)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (7)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (7)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending April 18, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending July 20, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCENTURY BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                   CICNotification Submitted Pursuant to 12 C.F.R. S 225.42(b)(1)(i) on behalf of Barbara J. Sloane, Barry R. Sloane, Linda Sloane Kay and Frank Dardeno with respect to Century Bancorp, Inc., Medford, Massachusetts.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableEASTHAMPTON SAVINGS BANK                                                                                                * BranchApplication by Easthampton Savings Bank, Easthampton, Massachusetts, to establish a de novo branch to be located at 253 Triangle Street, Amherst, Massachusetts pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableMASCOMA BANK                                                                                                            * BranchApplication by Mascoma Bank, Lebanon, New Hampshire for approval to establish two branches at 242-244 North Winooski Avenue, Burlington, Vermont and 431 Pine Street, Burlington, Vermont pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H.Newspaper: 07/26/2019Federal Register: Not applicableMIDDLESEX FEDERAL MHC                                                                                                   * MHC FormationApplication by Middlesex Federal MHC, Somerville, Massachusetts to become a mutual savings and loan holding company, in connection with the reorganization of Middlesex Federal Savings, F. A., Somerville, Massachusetts from a federal mutual savings association to a stock savings association. Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 07/05/2019