alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


        Set forth below are the subsidiaries of Foothill Independent Bancorp,
which is the record and beneficial owner of 100% of their respective outstanding
shares.


NAME AND STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION

Foothill Independent Bank, a California corporation

Foothill BPC, Inc., a California corporation

Platinum Results, Inc., a California corporation

        In accordance with the instructions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item
601 of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted those subsidiaries that, if
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         551,295
<SECURITIES>                                 1,757,599
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,538,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                   335,064
<INVENTORY>                                  4,269,301
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,088,144
<PP&E>                                      10,589,363
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,028,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,039,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,409,487
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,487
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,468,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,039,062
<SALES>                                     18,425,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,425,523
<CGS>                                        8,761,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,761,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,637,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                259,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            249,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   249,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02436-PAB-KMT

BROADSHEET LLC, an Isle of Man entity,

Petitioner,

To Issue Subpoenas For the Production of Documents.

ORDER

On October 18, 2011, the Court granted petitioner’s Petition and Application for

Order Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Permitting Applicants to Issue Subpoenas for the

Production of Documents from the Estate of Edgar Jerome “Jerry” James and Related

Individuals [Docket No. 1]. The Court further ordered that, in the absence of any

motions or further activity, this case would be closed sixty days after the entry of that

order. There has been no activity in this case since the entry of the October 18 order. 

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be closed in its entirety.

DATED December 19, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02436-PAB-KMT Document 10 Filed 12/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 99.5**

**Reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP**

We, our and BCE means BCE Inc., its subsidiaries and joint ventures.

Our annual consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). This reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP should be read in conjunction with ourannual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. We believe that this reconciliation reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results for the years shown.Material differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP are quantified and described below:

1

----
Case 1:11-sw-05438-MJW Document 14 Filed 01/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I Peter H. Jackson,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:    October 15, 2007

 
| /s/  PETER H. JACKSON                            |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Peter H.  Jackson                                     |
| *Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and President of* |
| *Intraware,  Inc.*                                         |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)*                           |

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intraware, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I Wendy A. Nieto,Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:    October 15, 2007

 
| /s/  WENDY A. NIETO            |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Wendy A.  Nieto                     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer and Executive* |
| *Vice  President of Intraware, Inc.*     |
| *(Principal  Financial Officer)*         |

 

----
#### STATE ex rel. James E. SHARPE et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 25, 1955.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 22, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Paul N. Vassello, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 613]

Crew III, J.P.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of *816respondent which denied petitioner’s applications for performance of duty and ordinary disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a firefighter, allegedly sustained certain injuries when he fell while descending a pumper truck in August 1998. In March 1999, petitioner filed an application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits and, one month later, his employer filed an application for ordinary disability retirement benefits on his behalf. Following the denial of both applications, petitioner requested a hearing. At the conclusion thereof, the hearing officer upheld the denial of the respective applications, finding that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties as a firefighter. Respondent thereafter issued a determination adopting the hearing officer’s findings and conclusions, prompting petitioner to commence this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to challenge respondent’s determination.

As a starting point, we reject petitioner’s assertion that respondent’s determination, which incorporated the findings and conclusions made by the hearing officer, was so lacking in evidentiary detail as to permit intelligent review. Although the hearing officer’s decision perhaps could have been written with greater clarity, it is apparent that the Hearing Officer indeed considered the competing medical opinions offered by the experts testifying on behalf of petitioner and the New York State and Local Retirement System and resolved such conflict in favor of the Retirement System *(compare, Matter of Palmer v McCall,*288 AD2d 680). Respondent, in adopting the hearing officer’s findings in this regard, was free to credit the testimony of one expert over that of another *(see, Matter of Meegan v New York State Retirement Sys.,*285 AD2d 892, 894), and as the testimony offered by the Retirement System’s expert constitutes substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination, it will not be disturbed. Petitioner’s remaining arguments on this point, to the extent not specifically addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Peters, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
# **EXHIBIT 32.1**

#  

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES**-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

#  

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned ChiefExecutive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or itsstaff upon request.

 
| Date: June 10,  2005 |                       |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|
|                      | /s/  Christopher A. Twomey |   |
|                      |                       | Christopher A.  Twomey, |
|                      |                       | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                           |                            |  |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of New generation  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jacques Mot
------------------------
Jacques Mot
Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2006
May 28, 2008 Joseph N. Laplante

Case 1:07-cv-00152-JL Document 15 Filed 05/28/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          (2320)<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    84683
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7344
<INVENTORY>                                      84806
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                183198
<PP&E>                                           58226
<DEPRECIATION>                                   21967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  264948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            52784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2316
<OTHER-SE>                                      131871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    264948
<SALES>                                         642852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                642852
<CGS>                                           544119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   544119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 61350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  31587
<INCOME-TAX>                                     11887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              19700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<FN>
<F1>THIS ITEM IS SHOWN NET OF "OUTSTANDING CHECKS, NET" ON THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS.
<F2>AMOUNT IS "BASIC" EPS AS COMPUTED PER FASB STATEMENT NO. 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS

KATHRYN KIPLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Minnesota

Division of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Defendant.

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

The parties appeared this morning for a status conference. Consistent with matters

discussed at the status conference,

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The pretrial conference on October 29, 2012, and all related deadlines, and the

trial set to commence on November 26, 2012, are VACATED, to be reset at a later date;

(2) The plaintiff is granted leave to file a sur-reply in opposition to Defendant’s

Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 26]. The sur-reply may not exceed five pages and shall

be filed on or before October 17, 2012; and

(3) Argument on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 26] is set for

one hour on November 2, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj

United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 51 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated October 10, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 51 Filed 10/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Catanzaritti *v.*Bianco, Appellant,

April 29, 1938:

(No. 2).

Argued March 9, 1938.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and Rhodes, JJ.

Per Curiam,

In accordance with the stipulation of counsel filed and approved March 10, 1938, the following decision is entered in the above entitled appeal.

Order reversed and record remitted to the end that the rule to strike off the judgment may be reinstated and made absolute.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 11.1

                           COLORADO MEDTECH, INC.

Statement Re: Computation of Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
for the Years Ended June 30, 1997 and 1996

<TABLE>
                                                 1997                        1996
                                        -----------------------    -------------------------
                                                         Fully                      Fully
                                          Primary       Diluted       Primary      Diluted
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------   -----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Net income                              $ 2,479,617   $ 2,479,617   $1,596,602   $ 1,596,602

Interest income from investment of 
proceeds from  assumed exercise of 
options/warrants in excess of 
proceeds used to repurchase 
outstanding shares (see below), net 
of income taxes (investment assumed 
to be made in U.S. government 
securities)                                 218,742        92,248        -           180,106
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------   -----------

Adjusted net income                     $ 2,698,359   $ 2,571,865   $1,596,602   $ 1,776,708
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------   -----------


Weighted average common shares 
outstanding                               7,165,499     7,165,499    6,901,762     6,901,762

Plus - common stock equivalents           5,499,610     5,499,610      865,043     5,171,292

Less - use of proceeds from assumed 
exercise of  options/warrants to 
repurchase outstanding  shares at 
the average (primary) and yearend 
(fully diluted) market price not to 
exceed 20% of the outstanding 
shares                                   (1,433,100)   (1,433,100)       -        (1,380,352)
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------   -----------

Adjusted weighted common shares
outstanding                              11,232,009    11,232,009    7,766,805    10,692,702
                                        -----------   -----------   ----------   -----------

Fully diluted net income per share             $.24          $.23         $.21          $.17
                                               ----         -----         ----         ----
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02496-PAB-KMT

DARRYL J. JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

This matter is before me on review of the file. One of my sisters is a partner at

the law firm of Holland & Hart, who has entered an appearance for defendant National

American University. For this reason, it would be inappropriate for me to preside over

this case. Accordingly, I will recuse myself. It is therefore 

ORDERED that the judge’s file be returned to the clerk’s office for the case to be

reassigned by random draw.

DATED March 29, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02496-RBJ-KMT Document 16 Filed 03/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-20-01-JL

David Bridgham

O R D E R

Because I was serving as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney

while this case was being prepared for prosecution by the U.S.

Attorneys Office, I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this

case, and request that the clerk reassign this matter to another

judge.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: February 5, 2009

cc: Alfred J.T. Rubega, AUSA

William E. Christie, Esquire

Case 1:09-cr-00020-SM Document 4 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 1
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R AF AE L GA R C I A- F R AN C O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72512 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 310- 031 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R a f a e l G ar c i a - F r anc o, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

th e d e c is io n o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls , d e n y in g a s u n tim e ly fi l ed and n um er i ca l l y barre d, pet i t i on er ’ s s ec on d m ot i on t o reopen rem ov al 

# FI LED JU N 29 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72512 2 pr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of d is c r e tio n , T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 988, 992 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , and w e de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. G arci a-F ran co co n t en d s th ath e m eri t s can cel l at i o n o f rem o v al rel i ef b ecau se h is U n ite dS ta te s c itiz e n c h ild r e n w ill e x p e r ie n c e th e r e qu is ite h ar d s h ip if h e is r e m ove d t o M e xi c o. B ynotr a i s i ng anyar gum e nt s c onc e rni ng the B I A ’ s di s pos i t i ve de t e rm i na t i on tha thi s s e c ond m ot i on t o r e ope n w a s num e r i c a l l y - barr e d and unt i m e l y , G ar c i a - F r anc o ha s w a i ve d anyc ha l l e nge t o tha tde t e rm i na t i on. See M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) . M or e ove r , the B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g G ar c ia - F r an c o ’s s e c o n dm o tio n to r e o p e n a s n u m e r ic a lly - b arr e dan du n tim e lyw h e r e th e m o tio n w a s f ile do v e rs ix y e ar s a f te rth e B I A ’s f

in a l o r d e r . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.