alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 31, 2008.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. First Trust Corporation*, New Orleans, Louisiana, to indirectly acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Globe Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Globe Homestead Savings Bank, FSA, both of Metairie, Louisiana, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(i) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 2008.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc.E8-23519 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 23.2



Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-41123
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-61559
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-76360
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-87694
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-102100
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-112659
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-122963, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-129820
| | - |  | ------------------------



of Integral Systems, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated November 21, 2003, with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements of
Integral Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2005.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



McLean, Virginia

December 12, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action: 11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Date: April 23, 2012 Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties: Counsel:

CLIFFORD E. LEWIN, 

Plaintiff,

Pro Se (appearing by telephone)

v.

ALLRED, Clinic Director

Defendant.

J. Benedict Garcia 

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Court in session: 10:01 a.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Discussion regarding plaintiff’s MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary

Injunction (Docket No. 13, filed on 10/19/2011). The court notes that there has been no response

to this motion filed by the defendant. Discussion between the court and Mr. Lewin regarding proper

service on the defendant.

For reasons stated on the record, 

ORDERED: The court DENIES without prejudice plaintiff’s MOTION for a Temporary

Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 13, filed on 10/19/2011). The

plaintiff is able to re-file this motion if desired. 

Discussion regarding setting deadlines, defendant’s MOTION to Dismiss (Docket No. 42, filed on

3/13/2012), and plaintiff’s Opposition Brief to #42 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss (Docket No.

48, filed on 4/9/2012). Counsel for the defendant informs the court that they will not be filing any

reply.

Discussion regarding claims and allegations, when the discovery should move forward in this case

(once the court has determined that a viable claim that will survive), Rule 26(b)(2)(c) pertaining to

Case 1:11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS Document 49 Filed 04/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
limiting discovery based on the needs of the case (not being unduly burdensome), defense of

qualified immunity being raised, and the court staying all discovery until there is a ruling on the

Motion to Dismiss. 

Discussion regarding plaintiff’s MOTION for Enlargement of Time (Docket No. 44, filed on

3/22/2012).

For reasons as stated on the record,

ORDERED: The court DENIES plaintiff's MOTION for Enlargement of Time (Docket No. 44,

filed on 3/22/2012).

Discussion regarding what documents defense counsel has received pertaining to mandatory

disclosures, Rule 26(a)(1) and its application to pro se plaintiffs, and Rule 26 and initial disclosures.

HEARING CONCLUDED. 

Court in recess: 10:29 a.m. 

Total time in court: 00:28

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods

Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case 1:11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS Document 49 Filed 04/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Kirk M. Warshaw,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2007

/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-----------------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-CV-2409-CMA-MJW

THERMAPURE, INC., a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DISASTER RESTORATION, INC., a Colorado corporation,

RESTORATION LOGISTICS, INC., a Colorado entity, and

DURACLEAN MASTER CLEANERS, INC., a Colorado corporation

Defendants.

ORDER RELEASING GARNISHED FUNDS HELD BY VECTRA BANK

This matter, having come before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff and 

Judgment Creditor Thermapure, Inc. (Doc. # 28), for an Order to release garnished 

funds presently being held by Vectra Bank of Colorado, and the Court, being fully 

advised in the premises, hereby GRANTS said motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Vectra Bank of Colorado shall release the 

$34,169.16 presently being held and release these funds to the Court, in the form of a 

check made payable to Clerk of the United States District Court, 901 19th Street, Room 

A-105, Denver, CO 80294-3589. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall then issue a check in the amount 

of $34,169.16 payable to Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey & Crow, P.C., as Plaintiff’s 

attorney, in satisfaction of the judgment. 

1

Case 1:11-cv-02409-CMA-MJW Document 29 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED: April 13 , 2015

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:11-cv-02409-CMA-MJW Document 29 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.45


CERTAIN INFORMATION IN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT
TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.


        Stabilized Rice Bran Processing, Sales, and Marketing Agreement
between California Pacific Rice Milling, Inc. and the Company effectively
dated January 1, 2000.*






[*] = CERTAIN INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT
TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the year ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael S. Ives, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                    
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|Date: April 5, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael S. Ives                
|                    |  |  |  | Michael S. Ives,                   
|                    |  |  |  | President & Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6383]

In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the Department of State Performance Review Board for career Senior Executive Service members:

Alexander A. Arvizu, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of State; (Outside Member);

Linda Jacobson, Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State;

Susan H. Swart, Chief Information Officer, Bureau of Information Resource Management, Department of State; (Outside Member);

Linda S. Taglialatela, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Human Resources, Department of State; and

James E. Tyckoski, Office Director, Office of Resource Planning and Budget, Bureau of Resource Management, Department of State.

Dated: September 17, 2008.

Harry K. Thomas, Jr.,

Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E8-23570 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01968-CMA-BNB

BYRON P. MOORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

_____________________________________________________________________

Having reviewed the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice Under Rule

41(a)(1)(ii) Fed.R.Civ.P., and being fully advised, this Court

ORDERS that the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. # 27) is

GRANTED. This action is dismissed with prejudice, each side to pay his or its own

attorneys’ fees and costs.

DATED: November 14, 2011.

BY THE COURT: 

_____________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01968-CMA-BNB Document 29 Filed 11/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02473-WJM-MJW

JAMES ROBERT FRISK,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss

filed December 16, 2011 (ECF No. 15). The Court having reviewed the Motion and

being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The above-captioned

matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his or its own attorney’s

fees and costs in this action.

Dated this 16th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02473-WJM-MJW Document 16 Filed 12/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
1 “[#19]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by

the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-01742-REB-MEH

CHRISTINE ARAGON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP, a Texas limited partnership,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#19]1 filed

October 19, 2011. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation

should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#19] filed October 19, 2011, is

APPROVED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for June 22, 2012, is VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence July 9, 2012, is VACATED; and

4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own

attorney fees and costs. 

Dated October 20, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-01742-REB-MEH Document 20 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:11-cv-01742-REB-MEH Document 20 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 333-113519
on Form S-8 dated March 11, 2004, Registration Statement 33-61977 on Form S-8
dated August 21, 1995, Registration Statement 33-61979 on Form S-8 dated August
21, 1995, Registration Statement 33-12571 on Form S-8 dated March 11, 1987 and
Registration Statement 33-593 on Form S-8 dated October 1, 1985, of our report
dated March 30, 2010 (which report indicates the company’s ability to continue
as a going concern), with respect to the balance sheets as of December 31, 2009
and 2008 and the statements of operations, stockholders’  deficit and
cash flows for each of the two years ended December 31, 2009, of Integral
Vision, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.






/S/ Rehmann Robson,
      P.C.




Troy,
Michigan


March 30,
2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-103-01-SM

Luis Escribano-Cora,

 Defendants

O R D E R

Defendant Cora’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

14). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of January 2010. Defendant Cora 

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than October 30, 2009. On the

filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00103-SM Document 15 Filed 10/19/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for January 8, 2010 at 4:00 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on January 20, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 19, 2009

cc: Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00103-SM Document 15 Filed 10/19/09 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER,

Defendants.

UNITED STATES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT STAY

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Attorney General of 

the United States Eric H. Holder, Barry R. Grissom, United States Attorney for the 

District of Kansas, through Special Attorney, Tonya S. Andrews, moves this Court to lift 

the stay in this case. As grounds therefor, the Plaintiff states that:

1. On May 21, 2013, the United States’ Unopposed Motion to Stay 

Proceedings was granted, thereby staying this case until November 17, 2012. (Doc. 

55).

2. On November 19, 2012, the United States’ Unopposed Motion to Extend 

the Stay of the Proceedings was granted, thereby further staying the proceedings until 

the criminal case was resolved. (Doc 62). 

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 70 filed 07/26/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
2

3. On February 7, 2013, the Clerk of the Court entered Judgment as to Final 

Order of Forfeiture for defendant 2008 Toyota Highlander, thus defendant 927 Cole 

Street is the only remaining asset in this case.

4. In the related criminal case, defendant Richard Dalton and Marie Dalton 

individually, entered in plea agreements, and on June 10, 2013, defendant Richard 

Dalton and Marie Dalton were sentenced; thus, the civil forfeiture action no longer 

needs to be stayed.

5. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1A, undersigned counsel represents that 

they conferred with Nicole M. Quintana, counsel for Claimant George Magnani 

regarding the instant motion. Counsel for the Claimant indicated Claimant did not object 

to lifting the stay.

WHEREFORE, the United States having shown good cause requests an order 

lifting the stay in the above styled and numbered case.

DATED this 26th day of July, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES

&

BARRY R. GRISSOM, # 10866

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

DISTRICT OF KANSAS

barry.grissom@usdoj.gov

By:s/ Tonya S. Andrews

tonya.andrews@usdoj.gov

Special Attorney

1225 17th Street, Suite 700

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0210

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 70 filed 07/26/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of July, 2013, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system which will send notice to all 

counsel of record.

s/ Tonya S. Andrews 

Special Attorney

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 70 filed 07/26/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133562 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133562 COA: 274556 Jackson CC: 05-000922-FC ANTONIO MONTEZ BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 12, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case for resentencing.

l0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2007

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS

CLIFFORD E. LEWIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALLRED, Clinic Director,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 8th day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02401-MSK-CBS Document 35 Filed 02/08/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1