alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATIONS**
  I, John
W. Stump, III, Chief Financial Officer of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
  4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  Date:May
5, 2005
 By:/s/
      John W. Stump, III
      John
      W. Stump, III
      Chief
      Financial Officer
 ****
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Christopher Romano, Defendant.

County Court, Bronx County,

February 18, 1957.

*172
      *Christopher Romano,*defendant in person.

*Daniel V. Sullivan, District Attorney (Milton Altschuler*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Samuel J. Joseph, J.

The defendant was convicted by jury verdict of rape, first degree, and on September 22, 1953, was sentenced by this court, as a second offender, to State prison for a term of 10 to 20 years. This judgment of conviction was unanimously affirmed on appeal (284 App. Div. 878). Several applications, in the nature of *coram nobis,*were thereafter made by the defendant attacking the legality of the said judgment of conviction on various grounds, each of which were denied. In his latest petition the defendant urges his recall for resentence on the ground that section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was not complied with, i. e., he was not asked whether he had any legal cause why judgment should not be pronounced against him. He further seeks to receive three days’ credit as jail time under section 2193 of the Penal Law for his confinement in a Michigan county jail, pending his delivery to the Hew York authorities, and time spent in his transportation to Hew York and his confinement in the Bronx City Prison. As to the merits of these claims, the available sentencing minutes establish compliance with the requirements of section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The one-week stay of execution of the judgment imposed by this court has no relevancy to the challenged legality of such proceeding. The cited case of *People ex rel. Miller*v. *Martin*(1 N Y 2d 406) is without applicability to the facts of the instant case. On the jail-time credit sought, it appears that the defendant’s commitment papers have indorsed thereon as jail time the actual period spent by him in The Bronx City Prison prior to his sentence. Any grievance with respect to the time allotted may be tested by the defendant at the proper time under habeas corpus. The motion is in all respects denied.
#### The State, ex rel. Berry, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 24847

Decided February 20, 1935.)

*Mr. Edward M. Ballard*and *Mr. Stanley S. Stewart,*for relator.

*Mr. John W. Bricker,*attorney general, and *Mr. B. R. Zurmehly,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard on the petition for mandamus and the answer, was argued by counsel and submitted to the court on the issues made by those pleadings.

Relator, Walter F. Berry, while engaged in laying gypsum boards in the construction of an arch shaped garage roof, slipped and fell to the cement floor below, sustaining injuries for which he was awarded medical expenses, compensation for temporary total disability and compensation for impairment of earning capacity. Relator filed a claim for additional compensation based upon a violation by his employer of the Code of Specific Requirements adopted by the Department of Industrial Relations and the Industrial Commission, for the safety of employees engaged in building and other construction work, Section 115 of which relates to temporary devices for roofing work, and Section 10 of which requires employers to immediately remove special or dangerous hazards which have been reported to the employer by an employee. Relator pleads he was working upon a pitched roof, and his employer did not furnish any crawling boards, ladders or *229chicken ladders, and did not provide protection against slipping and falling by employees, to which special and hazardous danger his employer’s attention was directed, but no steps were taken to remove the same. The Industrial Commission denied the application for an additional award, for the reason that there was no provision in the law or in the Code of Specific Requirements covering the operation in which the claimant was engaged at the time of the alleged injury. An application for reconsideration was subsequently denied by the Industrial Commission.

The relator in his petition prays mandamus to compel the Industrial Commission to hear and determine whether his injuries resulted from the failure by his employer to comply with Section 115 or Section 10 of the Safety Code of Specific Requirements, and upon finding a violation thereof that the additional award be granted relator.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the writ of mandamus be, and the same hereby is, denied. Under Section 35, Article II of the Constitution, the Industrial Commission is vested with full power and authority to determine whether an injury resulted from the violation of a specific requirement for the safety of employees, and in determining the question of fact whether an injury resulted from such violation, the decision of the Industrial Commission is final *(Slatmeyer*v. *Industrial Commission,*115 Ohio St., 654), and relator in an action in mandamus to compel the allowance of an additional award must show that the finding of the Industrial Commission against him amounts to an abuse of discretion *(State, ex rel. Stuber,*v. *Industrial Commission,*127 Ohio St., 325).

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Williams, Jones, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
<TABLE>
                                                                 Exhibit 12

                       ENRON CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
                               FIXED CHARGES
                           (Dollars in Millions)
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                     Six Months
                                        Ended            Year Ended December 31,
                                       6/30/00   1999     1998    1997    1996      1995

<S>                                    <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>    <C>      <C>
Earnings available for fixed charges
 Net income                            $  627   $1,024   $  703   $105   $  584   $  520
 Less:
   Undistributed earnings and
    losses of less than 50% owned
    affiliates                            (27)     (12)     (44)   (89)    (39)      (14)
   Capitalized interest of
    nonregulated companies                (29)     (61)     (66)   (16)    (10)       (8)
 Add:
   Fixed charges(1)                       529      948      809    674     454       436
   Minority interests                      74      135       77     80      75        27
   Income tax expense                     163      137      204    (65)    297       310
     Total                             $1,337   $2,171   $1,683   $689  $1,361    $1,271

Fixed Charges
 Interest expense(1)                   $  508   $  900   $  760   $624  $  404    $  386
 Rental expense representative
  of interest factor                       21       48       49     50      50        50
     Total                             $  529   $  948   $  809   $674  $  454    $  436

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       2.53     2.29     2.08   1.02    3.00      2.92

<FN>
(1) Amounts exclude costs incurred on sales of accounts receivables.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                            1866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31827
<ALLOWANCES>                                       542
<INVENTORY>                                      24896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 70237
<PP&E>                                          102681
<DEPRECIATION>                                   78159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  100947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            28447
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38273
<OTHER-SE>                                       13631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    100947
<SALES>                                         178304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                178304
<CGS>                                           150284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   150284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4745
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3044
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02444–WYD–KMT

AMERICAN WEB, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v. 

FLOM CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation,

Defendant/Counter-Claimant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

In light of Defendant’s Response (Doc. No. 18) stating that it consents to Plaintiff’s Second

Amended Complaint, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. No.

14, filed Nov. 23, 2011) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff’s Second

Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14-1). 

Dated: December 2, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02444-WYD-KMT Document 19 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### John M. RITTER, Appellant, v. Julian G. O’NEAL and Frances R. O’Neal, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Feb. 26, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Donald A. Benziger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MainSource Financial
Group;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting .


Date:  March 10, 2004

Donald A. Benziger
------------------
[Signature]

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
-----------------------------------------------
[Title]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Arnold P. Kling,  President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Arnold P. Kling
-----------------------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President
May 12, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered March 17, 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00651

- CV

ANDREW WHITE, Appellant

V.

NHI

- REIT OF AXEL, LL C, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Distr ict Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 07841

O RDER

On the Court ’ s own motion, th is appeal is REMOVED from submission on

April 14, 2020. We will reset this appeal in due cour se.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### WINN v. DYAL.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
EXHIBIT 23.2



Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

CardioDynamics International Corporation:



The audits referred to in our report dated February 28, 2005, included the related financial statement schedule as of November 30, 2004, and for each of the years in the two-year period ended
November 30, 2004, included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements Nos. 333-40969, 333-38920, 333-38922, 333-70902, and 333-119044 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-31275, 333-65331, 333-69669, 333-69663, 333-69659, 333-86475, 333-88311, 333-88307, 333-88309, 333-31702, 333-44226, 333-66396,
333-69456, 333-69458, 333-70916, 333-104236, and 333-117486 on Form S-3 of CardioDynamics International Corporation of our reports dated February 28, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of CardioDynamics International
Corporation as of November 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended November 30, 2004, and the
financial statement schedule which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K of CardioDynamics International Corporation as of and for the year ended November 30, 2005.





|            
|------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP
|KPMG LLP    



San Diego, California

February 28, 2006
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 27, 2022

----

Currency            Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) -- multicycle budget funding for certain expenses related to BEP facility projects.            -Approved, August 24, 2022            Regulations and Policies            Rules Regarding Delegation of Authority -- final rule to codify and revise delegations of authority previously approved by the  Board, make technical changes, and rescind  moot or superseded delegations.            -Approved, August 17, 2022            (A/C)          Reserve Bank Operations            Employee Conduct Policy  -- update.            -Approved, July 27, 2022            (A/C)          
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Soba, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 415]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered September 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of sodomy in the third degree, sexual abuse in the third degree (four counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

*426The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its resolution of inconsistencies in testimony *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23564]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6374]


Notice of Intent To Establish the Global AIDS Coordinator's 
Expert Panel on Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 309 of the United States Global Leadership 
Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 
2008, (``the Act''), Public Law 110-293, this is a notice of intent to 
establish the Global AIDS Coordinator's Expert Panel on Prevention of 
Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV.
    Purpose: The objectives and scope of activities of the Expert Panel 
are to provide an objective review of activities to prevent mother-to-
child transmission of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus, the pathogen 
that causes Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)), and to provide 
a report and recommendations to the Global AIDS Coordinator and to the 
appropriate congressional committees for scale-up of prevention of 
Mother-to-Child transmission prevention services.
    Membership: The Panel shall consist of not more than fifteen 
members appointed by the Global AIDS Coordinator. Members of the Panel 
shall be drawn from governmental and private sector organizations, in 
accordance with the requirements under section 309 of the Act. All 
meetings of this Panel will be announced ahead of time by notice 
published in the Federal Register.
    Further information regarding this Panel may be obtained from 
Rebecca Hooper, Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, U.S. Department 
of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 663-2440.

     Dated: September 29, 2008.
Thomas Walsh,
Deputy U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator, Acting Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E8-23564 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P