alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,567
<PP&E>                                          12,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,669
<BONDS>                                          8,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,130
<COMMON>                                         6,640
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,576
<SALES>                                         25,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,139
<CGS>                                           25,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (940)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    834
<INCOME-TAX>                                        69
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (131)
<NET-INCOME>                                       634
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79




</TABLE>
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 350 filed 11/05/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending November 28, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
      Mitchell Gross


Mitchell
      Gross


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      8, 2006
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-01964-RBJ-KLM Document 82 Filed 06/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 8
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 0046 6

- CR

Thomas Loris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 3

of Denton County ( CR

- 2010

- 07703

- C )

August 1 , 2013

Opi nion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT O F APPEALS

By_________________________________

Justice Bill Meier
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02437-RPM

ANDREA L. CHISHOLM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCK GARDENS RAFTING, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

GLENWOOD CANYON ZIP LINE ADVENTURES, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

ROCK GARDENS MOBILE HOME PARK & CAMPGROUND, LLC d/b/a GLENWOOD

 CANYON RESORT, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL, an Individual,

JEFFREY HALE, an Individual, and

BRIAN VANDERMARK, an Individual.

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon review of the Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order and Extend

Deadlines for Expert Discovery [44] filed July 2, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the Scheduling Order entered December 15, 2011, is vacated.

DATED: July 31st, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02437-RPM Document 47 Filed 07/31/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REQUIRE PRODUCTION OF ATTORNEY BILLING

STATEMENTS AND SETTING TIME FOR REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES

On November 21, 2007, defendant Molychem, LLC, filed a motion for award of

attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses. The plaintiff filed its response on December

11, 2007. On December 13, 2007, Molychem filed a motion to require production of

Climax’s attorney billing statements and to extend the time to reply to the opposition to

its motion for fees and expenses. Climax filed a response on January 2, 2008, and on

January 3, 2008, Molychem withdrew its motion for disclosure of Climax’s attorney

service hours but requested a summary disclosure of the hourly rates charged to

Climax by counsel in this case. Because this Court can and will determine the

reasonableness of the fees without regard to the charges made by counsel to Climax,

that request will be denied and Molychem may file its reply to the opposition to its

motion. Accordingly, it is
2

ORDERED that the motion to require production of Climax’s attorney billing

statements, as modified on January 3, 2008, is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the time for Molychem to reply to the opposition to its

motion for award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses is extended to and including

January 29, 2008.

DATED: January 15th, 2008

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                   Certification of Chief Accounting Officer
                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section
              1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of United States Code

     We, Harris A. Shapiro and Irene J. Marino, do hereby certify that:

     1. This annual report of PerfectData  Corporation  containing the financial
statements  for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 fully  complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m) and

     2. The information  contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of
PerfectData Corporation.



Date:    September 9, 2004


                                                 /s/ Harris A. Shapiro
                                                     Harris A. Shapiro
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




                                                 /s/ Irene J. Marino_
                                                     Irene J. Marino
                                                     Vice President, Finance,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer and
                                                     Chief Accounting Officer









A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  PerfectData  Corporation  and  will  be  retained  by  PerfectData
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                E-8
<PAGE>
#### Christopher Drexler et al., Plaintiffs, v Highlift, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. New York City Transit Authority, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent; Lull Industries, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 894]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant Lull Industries, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated June 5, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

The third-party defendant Lull Industries, Inc. (hereinafter Lull), moved for summary judgment dismissing the third-party *435complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction. The defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent, Highlift, Inc. (hereinafter Highlift), and the third-party defendant-respondent, New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA), opposed the motion, asserting that the long-arm jurisdiction afforded under CPLR 302 (a) (3) (ii) subjected Lull to the jurisdiction of New York courts.

A non-domiciliary may be subject to suit if “the sale of one of its products arises from the efforts of the manufacturer or distributor to serve directly the market for its product in other countries or States, and its allegedly defective merchandise has been a source of injury” *(Napolitano v Mastic Bicycles & Fitness Co.,*279 AD2d 461, 462; *see*CPLR 302 [a] [3] [ii]; *WorldWide Volkswagen Corp. v Woodson,*444 US 286; *LaMarca v Pak-Mor Mfg. Co.,*95 NY2d 210). Here, Highlift and the NYCTA submitted sufficient facts to demonstrate that Lull engaged in activities which made it foreseeable that its products would be marketed and found in New York, thereby subjecting it to long-arm jurisdiction.

Lull’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul W. Pence, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

May 14, 2005

                                             /s/Paul W. Pence, Jr.

                                             Paul W. Pence, Jr.
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Faulkenson, Also Known as Everton Heron, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 453]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sheridan, J.), rendered November 17, 1997, convicting him of assault in the second degree (five counts) and promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*420The hearing court properly determined that the People should not be charged with postreadiness delay for the failure to produce the defendant. The evidence adduced supported the court’s conclusion that the People’s conduct did not constitute a direct impediment to the commencement of the trial since they exercised due diligence in trying to obtain the presence of the defendant in court *(see People v England,*84 NY2d 1; *People v Knight,*163 AD2d 583). Accordingly, the defendant was not denied his statutory right to a speedy trial.

The defendant’s claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the convictions under counts three, four, and five of the indictment, each alleging assault in the second degree, is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of all counts of assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial testimony demonstrated the existence of physical injury to each of the victims *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [7]).

The majority of the defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s conduct at trial are unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant did not timely object to the errors challenged on appeal with sufficient specificity *(see People v Dien,*77 NY2d 885). In any event, in light of the nature of the statements made by the defense attorney in summation, the comments made by the prosecutor in his summation were reasonable and do not require reversal *(see People v Draksin,*145 AD2d 500).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02467-DME-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502

Date: January 11, 2012 Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller

Parties

CARLO LOMBARDI,

Plaintiff(s),

Counsel

David J. Furtado

v.

ADVANTAGE LOGISTICS, INC.,

Defendant(s).

- - - - - 

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 9:49 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Paul D. Godec appears on behalf of an entity that

was erroneously served by Plaintiff, Advantage Transportation, Inc., d/b/a Dart Advantage

Logistics.

The company that was erroneously served by Plaintiff, Advantage Transportation, Inc., d/b/a

Dart Advantage Logistics, has filed a Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4]. As it appears it has no

standing in this case and is not a party in this case, and with no objection by Plaintiff,

It is ORDERED: Advantage Transportation, Inc., d/b/a Dart Advantage Logistics’ MOTION 

TO DISMISS [Docket No. 4, filed November 21, 2011] is WITHDRAWN.

Attorney Paul D. Godec is withdrawn as counsel of record in this case

and electronic notification shall be removed by the Clerk of the Court from

CM/ECF, the court record system.

It is determined Advantage Logistics, Inc. is not the properly named defendant.

Advantage Logistics USA West LLC is believed to be the correct defendant.

Plaintiff represents to the Court that the correct defendant was served out-of-state, on either

October 13, 2011 or October 31, 2011. 

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff shall forthwith file the return of service as to the correct

defendant.

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff shall have up to and including JANUARY 25, 2012 to file a

motion to amend the caption to reflect the correct defendant.

Case 1:11-cv-02467-DME-MJW Document 9 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

It is ORDERED: Plaintiff shall have up to and including JANUARY 25, 2012 to file a

motion for entry of clerk’s default or, if necessary, a motion to file an

Amended Complaint and the proposed Amended Complaint.

It is ORDERED: A TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE is set

JANUARY 30, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 

All participating parties are to be on the call before the Court is contacted; Plaintiff shall create

the conference call. Once the conference call is established, the Court shall be added as the

final connection by dialing (303) 844-2403 at the scheduled time.

Hearing concluded.

Court in recess: 10:00 a.m.

Total In-Court Time 00:11

To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Wood Reports (303) 825-6119 or Toll Free 1-800-962-3345. 

Case 1:11-cv-02467-DME-MJW Document 9 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Employment offer letter between the Company and Varadarajan Srinivasan



 Exhibit 10.19 
  
 NOVALOGIC LETTERHEAD 
  
 Varad, 
  
 I am very pleased to offer you the position of Vice President of New Product Development at NovaLogic. This position will report to me and provide to you
the following: 
  

			
	 Salary:
	  	$110,000 per year
		
	 Stock options:
	  	175,000 shares of NovaLogic common stock (the option price will be set by NovaLogics board of directors on Feb 23) vesting will be annually over 4 years your start date will be February
26, 1996.

  
 As we discussed, in
this position you will be development responsibility for all new products designed by NovaLogic, and will set up a product design capability for NovaLogic. 
  
 At your request, we will provide to you a 3 month’s pay severance package should NovaLogic decide to terminate you. (Obviously we do not expect this
to happen, but it is an added security to you in joining NovaLogic) This severance package is only available to you, should NovaLogic choose to terminate the relationship. It will provide to you 3 months pay guarantee if terminated by NovaLogic.

  
 To accept this offer please sign and return prior to Feb 12,
1996. We are very anxious to have you join us, and look forward to your contributions at NovaLogic. 
  
 /s/ Mike Rooney 
  
 Mike Rooney 
 NovaLogic, LLC 
 C.O.O. 
  

					
	 Varad Srinivasan
	 	 	 	 Date

			
	/s/    Varad Srinivasan        	 	 	 	February 9, 1996
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0340

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW SEVERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 1, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 23 2023

01/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0340
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW

JOEL HUGHES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICER WESLEY KVASNICKA; and 

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Jointly and Severally,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant’s [sic] Unopposed Motion to Amend

Scheduling Order (Docket No. 31) is granted. Accordingly, the Scheduling Order

(Docket No. 23) is amended such that the defendants shall have up to and including

October 4, 2012, to make their rebuttal expert disclosures. It is further

ORDERED that the plaintiff shall forthwith provide to defendants medical

releases for the records held by plaintiff’s experts, Drs. Pehl and Poddar, regarding the

plaintiff’s treatment.

Date: August 29, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW Document 33 Filed 08/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
  99(ii)

CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In
  connection with the Annual Report of A.G. Edwards, Inc. (the Registrant)
  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003, to be filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2003, hereof (the Report),
  the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and                                  
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                           | A.G. EDWARDS,
      INC.
|-------------------------- | ------------------------
|                           |                         
|                           |                         
|Date: April
      28, 2003 | By:                     
|                           |                         
|                           |                         

|* | A signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

53

---