alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                           THE LEARNING COMPANY, INC.
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                (In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Years Ended December 31,
                                                      -------------------------------------------
                                                         1996            1995            1994
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>             <C>
Net income (loss)                                     $  (405,451)     $  (65,960)     $   21,145
Add:
  Interest on convertible debentures and notes                 --              --             663
  Amortization of convertible debenture issue costs            --              --             119
                                                      -----------      ----------      ----------
Adjusted net income (loss)                            $  (405,451)     $  (65,960)     $   21,927
                                                      ===========      ==========      ==========
Weighted average common and exchangeable shares
  outstanding                                          40,801,000      24,855,000      18,710,123
Common equivalent shares:
Incremental shares calculated by the Treasury Stock
  method applied to options, convertible debentures
  and warrants issued, using the greater of the
  closing and average fair value                               --              --       2,404,877
                                                      -----------      ----------      ----------
Common and common share equivalents outstanding for
  purposes of calculating fully diluted earnings per
  share                                                40,801,000      24,855,000      21,115,000
                                                      ===========      ==========      ==========
Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share               $     (9.94)     $    (2.65)     $     1.04
</TABLE>
#### Steve SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Daisy JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14694.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 23, 1934.

H. G. Huekabee, of New Orleans, for appellant.

M. R. Woulfe, of New Orleans, for appellee..

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by Steve Smith,, a negro long- • shoreman, against Daisy Johnson, his former concubine, for the partition of a certain piece of property acquired by Steve Smith and' *887Daisy Johnson by purchase from James J. Manson by act before P. Magne, notary public, on the 18th day of March, 1926, and registered in Conveyance Booh 407, Folio Book 175. In the petition Smith alleges that the act of sale erroneously declared that plaintiff and defendant were man and wife, whereas in truth and fact no such status existed between them, and that, therefore, they are each the owner of an undivided one-half of the property which is the subject of the partition proceedings.

Daisy Johnson answered" admitting that she was not married to Smith and expressed her acquiescence in the partition of the property, but averred that she was fraudulently Induced to sign the act of sale by which the property was acquired in the name of Smith and herself, erroneously described as man and wife, under the belief that she was acquiring full ownership of the property, most of the purchase price of which she avers was advanced by her.

On the trial of the case the allegations of fraud in defendant’s answer were abandoned, and the court, after hearing considerable testimony concerning the contributions of both parties to the purchase price of the property, ordered the partition as prayed for, whereupon it was agreed between counsel that the property should be sold by Mr. Harry Latter at public auction, and the act of sale passed before Wm. J. Formento, notary public. From this judgment defendant has appealed and renews in this court the argument made •below, based upon the voluminous testimony in the record, to the effect that the judgment should be so qualified as to order a distribution of the proceeds of the sale upon a basis of what, it is claimed, has been established as the respective contributions of the parties to the purchase price of the property.

In our opinion the judgment of the district court is correct. The sole issue in this proceeding is the right of the plaintiff to have the property described in his petition sold in order to effect a partition. He is the owner of an undivided one-half of the property on the face of the record, and, if either party to this proceeding has any claim one against the other for money advanced, the matter could be considered in an appropriate proceeding.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### GOODSPEED v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-CV-02380-REB-MJW

BRIAN C. COOK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BALL CORPORATION,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Protective Order (docket

no. 16) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The written Stipulated Protective

Order (docket no. 16-1) is APPROVED as amended in paragraph 8 and made an Order

of Court.

Date: April 4, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02380-REB-MJW Document 18 Filed 04/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000717374
<NAME> 82II.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         199,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,928
<PP&E>                                       9,175,329
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,435,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,996,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,950,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,996,995
<SALES>                                        672,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,134,263
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  995,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            138,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amscan Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gerald
C. Rittenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Michael A. Correale, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                        /s/ Gerald C. Rittenberg
                        ------------------------------
                           Gerald C. Rittenberg
                        Chief Executive Officer

                        /s/ Michael A. Correale
                        ------------------------------
                           Michael A. Correale
                        Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the CardioDynamics International
Corporation (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-k for the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve P. Loomis, Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 1, 2005



/s/    STEVE P.
LOOMISSteve P. LoomisVice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Form 10-K), I, Jack W. Oehlke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 17, 2004



/s/ Jack W. OehlkeJack W. OehlkePresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### McKISSICK v. AVEX, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02465-RPM-KMT

LAURICE LEIGH,

Plaintiff,

v.

PROFESSIONAL BUREAU OF COLLECTIONS,

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

____________________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [19] filed today, it is

ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party.

DATED: May 3rd, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

_________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02465-RPM-KMT Document 20 Filed 05/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02536-PAB-MEH

ELAINE CALDERON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE,

ANN TAPP, Executive Director, Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence, and

MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS COUNCIL,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 2, 2012.

Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [filed March 1, 2012; docket #40] is denied

without prejudice. Although the proposed order is drafted and submitted in accordance with

Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), the Defendants have failed

to attach a proposed written acknowledgment of the Protective Order for the Court’s consideration.

Case 1:11-cv-02536-PAB-MEH Document 42 Filed 03/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130731 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130731 

 COA: 266412 

Roscommon CC: 04-004612-FC 

DEWAYNE LAMAR LANCE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 5/14/09 |   |                                                                     |   |
|--------|---------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |    |   |                                                                     |   |
|   |    |   | /s/      PATRICK J. LAWLOR                                               |   |
|   |    |   | Patrick      J. Lawlor                                                   |   |
|   |    |   | Vice      President Finance,Chief      Financial Officer & Secretary |   |

----

----
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
the Report.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Stephen P.
Marsh


Stephen
P. Marsh, President & Chief Executive Officer





March 27,
2009
#### Miller, a Taxpayer, *v.*Cope et al., Board of Trustees of Public Affairs of Village of Orrville, et al.

(No. 25002

Decided December 12, 1934.)

*82
      *Messrs. Troutman & Taggart*and *Mr. H. H. Hoppe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Alton H. Etling*and *Mr. G. Bay Craig,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Garver, Hart, Stephenson, Williams, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending September 3, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF HAWAII                                                                                                          * BranchBank of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, to reopen its newly renovated Pearl City Branch, Pearl City, Hawaii, between November 7, 2016 to November 14, 2016.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableFIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.                                                                                         CICFirst Financial Northwest, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Renton, Washington, seeks retroactive non-objection under the Change in Bank Control Act to increase its holdings of the voting common stock of First Financial Northwest, Inc., from 9.98 percent to a maximum of 12.86 percent, and thereby First Financial Northwest Bank, both of Renton, Washington, as a result of Bancorp's 2016 stock repurchases.Newspaper: 09/01/2016Federal Register: 09/06/2016FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.                                                                                         CICFirst Financial Northwest Foundation, Renton, Washington, seeks retroactive non-objection under the Change in Bank Control Act to increase its holdings of the voting common stock of First Financial Northwest, Inc., from 9.63 percent to a maximum of 12.41 percent, and thereby First Financial Northwest Bank, both of Renton, Washington, as a result of Bancorp's 2016 stock repurchases.Newspaper: 09/01/2016Federal Register: 09/06/2016NHB HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                                                      CICBrink Investments, Christina Ann Fink, Orlando, Florida, Robert Thomas Fink, Fayetteville, Arkansas, and Timothy Russell Brose, St. Petersburg, Florida, for approval to retain over 10 percent of the voting shares of NHB Holdings, Inc., which owns Proficio Bank, both of Cottonwood Heights, Utah.Newspaper: 07/15/2014Federal Register: Not availableWELLS FARGO & COMPANY                                                                                                   CICChange in Bank Control Notice filed by Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., et al, Omaha, Nebraska, to acquire over 10.0 percent of the voting common stock of Wells Fargo & Company, San Francisco, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 07/19/2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lavar Hargroves, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 724]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 26, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50 *(see People v Hargroves,*296 AD2d 581 [decided herewith]). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS 

(Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-2395, 11-cv-2396 and 11-cv-2397)

ANA ALICIA ORTEGA,

KELLY BOREN,

KRISTAL CARILLO and

SHARELLE C. THOMAS,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipality,

OFFICER RICKY NIXON, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER KEVIN DEVINE, in his individual and official capacity,

OFFICER JOHN DOE ONE, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity, and

OFFICER JOHN DOE TWO, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police

Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City and County of Denver’s

Unopposed Motion for Consolidation filed September 19, 2011 (ECF No. 9). Pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.5E, this Court finds that the actions

listed below involve common questions of law or fact, including common parties and

common claims. Furthermore, the Court finds that consolidation of these cases will

avoid unnecessary costs and delays, and promote the efficient administration of justice. 

Case 1:11-cv-02396-WJM-CBS Document 12 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

As required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1A, approval for consolidation from Chief

U.S. District Judge Wiley Y. Daniel has been granted. Accordingly, the Court having

reviewed and considered the Unopposed Motion and the file, and being otherwise fully

advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Consolidation is GRANTED. The following

actions are consolidated with the instant action for all purposes, and all future filings in

any of these actions shall contain the caption as set forth above and shall be docketed

under Civil Action No. 11-cv-02394-WJM-CBS:

1. 11-cv-2395-CMA-CBS (Kelly Boren v. City and County of Denver, et. al)

2. 11-cv-2396-DME-MEH (Kristal Carrillo v. City and County of Denver, et.

al); and

3. 11-cv-2397-MSK-MEH (Sharelle C. Thomas v. City and County of Denver,

et al.).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that U.S. Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer will be

the sole referral Magistrate Judge in the Consolidated Action.

Dated this 3rd day of October, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02396-WJM-CBS Document 12 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2