alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:07 a.m. on 
Thursday, September 25, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's resolution activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), seconded by Vice Chairman Martin J. 
Gruenberg, concurred in by Director John M. Reich (Director, Office of 
Thrift Supervision), Chairman Sheila C. Bair, and Director John C. 
Dugan (Director, Comptroller of the Currency), that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven 
days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii) and (c)(9)(B) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: September 25, 2008.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23401 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH

CARL GENBERG,

Plaintiff,

v.

STEVEN S. PORTER,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 24, 2015. 

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order [filed November

23, 2015; docket #226] is denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order

is refused. The parties are granted leave to re-file their motion and submit a revised proposed

protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo.

2000), in which the Court requires a specific mechanism by which the parties may challenge the

designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. 

Case 1:11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH Document 228 Filed 11/24/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,560,065
<SECURITIES>                                 8,190,621
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,140,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (478,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,512,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,066,400
<PP&E>                                      12,724,461
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,155,650)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,291,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,869,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,468,486
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,291,863
<SALES>                                     74,033,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            74,033,103
<CGS>                                       47,177,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,145,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,413,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,423,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,990,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,990,554
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

                                           /s/ Jeffrey Dean Agee                                           Chief Financial Officer                                            Date: March 14, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

JUDGE Christine M. Arguello

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00358-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTHONY PAUL BREAUX,

Defendant.

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

This criminal action has proceeded to sentencing and a final judgment and

conviction, and Defendant Breaux was remanded to the custody of the United States

Marshal at sentencing, or has self-surrendered to the designated facility, as confirmed

by the United States Bureau of Prisons. As a result, all the conditions of an appearance

bond imposed by the Court as a pretrial matter to secure Defendant’s release, pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c), have been satisfied. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the bond in this case is hereby exonerated and the surety or

sureties, if applicable, are released. It is further 

ORDERED that the bail funds or property deposited into the registry of the court

shall hereby be released by the clerk of the court, or a designated deputy, to the surety

or the Defendant. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 9th day of May, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02441-REB-BNB

ISADORE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICERS GARCIA,

ROMAN YEPSHIN,

SERGEY GUREVICH,

DETECTIVE JOEY SMITH, and

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, jointly and severally,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

 ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

The parties appeared this morning for what was scheduled to be a final pretrial

conference. The plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, failed to participate in the preparation of the

proposed final pretrial order, however, so none was entered. In addition, I am informed that Mr.

Brown refused to appear for a deposition, resulting in the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #

42]. Finally, there is pending an Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 48] why the case should not be

dismissed based on the plaintiff’s failure to keep the court informed of his current address and

failure to prosecute the case.

The plaintiff’s counsel was allowed to withdraw on June 28, 2012. Order [Doc. # 41]. 

No substitute counsel has entered its appearance. At the time plaintiff’s counsel was allowed to

withdraw, I cautioned the plaintiff that he is personally responsible for complying with all court

orders and all applicable rules, and that his failure to comply may result in the imposition of

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 72 Filed 11/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

sanctions, including dismissal of his case. I reiterated that warning orally this morning, and I

reiterate it again here. Any failure by the plaintiff to comply with court orders and applicable

rules, including the plaintiff’s failure to appear for and give his deposition or to participate in the

preparation of a final pretrial order and appear at the final pretrial conference, is likely to lead to

the entry of sanctions, including potentially the dismissal of this case.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The plaintiff shall appear for and give his deposition on November 27, 2012, at

9:00 a.m., at the Office of the Denver City Attorney, 201 West Colfax Avenue, 11th floor,

Denver, Colorado; and

(2) A final pretrial conference will be held on December 17, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., in

Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,

Colorado. A proposed final pretrial order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the

court no later than December 13, 2012. The plaintiff shall cooperate with defense counsel in the

preparation of the proposed final pretrial order.

Dated November 1, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 72 Filed 11/01/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels will hold a meeting on Friday, October 24, 2008, at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, Room T-2B3. 

The meeting will be open to public attendance. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

## Friday, October 24, 2008,—8:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. 

The Subcommittee will receive an update on the technical basis supporting changes to the fuel design criteria within 10 CFR 50.46 (b). The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

                    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Officer, Mr. Christopher L. Brown (Telephone: 301-415-7111) 5 days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. Detailed procedures for the conduct of and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 26, 2007, (72 FR 54695).                 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:45 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Chief, Reactor Safety Branch A, ACRS.

[FR Doc. E8-23347 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors

Heritage Bankshares, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements No. 333-112214 on Form S-8 of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated June 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of HeritageBankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years ended December31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, which report appears in this annual report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

Norfolk, Virginia 

June 9, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 08-mc-76-SM

Gregg E. Chase

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 2, 2008, no objection having been filed. Therefore,

Gregg E. Chase is hereby ordered to obey the summonses and that he appear on

January 22, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. at 80 Daniel Street, Portsmouth, New Hampshire,

before J.L. Shing, to give testimony and produce all books and records in his

possession or control required and called for by the terms of the summonses of

May 7, 2008. The government is awarded its costs.

SO ORDERED.

January 5, 2009 /s/Steven J. McAuliffe 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Seth R. Aframe, AUSA

Gregg E. Chase, pro se

Case 1:08-mc-00076-SM Document 5 Filed 01/05/09 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raymond
F. Kunzmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Raymond F. Kunzmann
---------------------------
Raymond F. Kunzmann
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2005
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00775-CR

ANTONIO DELEON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-2-26381-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 19, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Debra Franchi

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00395-JL

New Hampton School

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

November 2, 2009.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 23) is approved as

submitted, with the following changes:

• Trial date: December, 2010

• Summary judgment: August 2, 2010

• Close of discovery: June 15, 2010

• Challenges to expert testimony: July 26, 2010

Based on the discussions between the court and counsel at

the conference, as well as the ruling on the motion to dismiss,

the following are stricken without prejudice to being reinstated

on request if warranted by the evidence:

Case 1:08-cv-00395-JL Document 25 Filed 11/02/09 Page 1 of 3
2

• the plaintiff’s claims for sexual discrimination (Count

3), fair housing discrimination under states law (Count 5),

public accommodation discrimination under state law (Count 6),

breach of fiduciary duty (Count 8), intentional infliction of

emotional distress (Count 12), and consumer protection (Count

14). Counts 9, 10, 11, and 13, sounding in negligence, may be

consolidated or narrowed for trial.

• the following affirmative defenses: laches and unclean

hands (8th affirmative defense).

The Americans with Disabilities Act will be applied as

amended (effective January 1, 2009) unless the court issues an

order to the contrary, either sua sponte or based on a motion by

a party.

Summary Judgment. The parties and counsel are advised that

compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding

evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and

delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be

required.

Discovery disputes. Discovery disputes will be handled by

the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the

normal course. No motion to compel is necessary. The party or

counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with

adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then

Case 1:08-cv-00395-JL Document 25 Filed 11/02/09 Page 2 of 3
3

contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the

court. The court will inform counsel and parties what written

materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the

conference call.

Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by

the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible. If counsel

prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call

procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should

expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the

United States Magistrate Judge. Such referral requests will

normally be granted.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: November 2, 2009

cc: Donna-Marie Cote, Esq.

Peter E. Hutchins, Esq.

Andrew W. Serell, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00395-JL Document 25 Filed 11/02/09 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2214

VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, INC., Petitioner,

versus RICHARD BRYANT; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB 02-0792) Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. F. Nash Bilisoly, IV, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Mark A. Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Kathleen H. Kim, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Director, OWCP. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Virginia International Terminals, Inc., seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of relief from liability for disability benefit payments pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 908(f) (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Va. Int’l Terminals, Inc. v. Bryant , No. 02-0792 (BRB Aug. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 30 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 30 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 30 Filed 02/02/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                    SCHEDULE TO FORM OF HCRI LEASE AGREEMENT
                PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 NUMBER     MAXIMUM         FACILITY         CONSENT TO
               LANDLORD         TENANT           OF UNITS   LEASE AMOUNT                     JURISDICTION IN
<S>            <C>              <C>              <C>        <C>             <C>              <C>
LEBANON,       Pennsylvania     Financial Care   60         $4,181,799.00   Balanced Care,   Lebanon
PENNSYLVANIA   BCC              Investors of                                Lebanon          County,
               Properties,Inc.  Lebanon, LLC                                                 Pennsylvania


LOYALSOCK,     Pennsylvania     Financial Care   60         $4,440,815.00   Balanced Care,   Lycoming
PENNSYLVANIA   BCC              Investors of                                Loyalsock        County,
               Properties, Inc. Loyalsock, LLC                                               Pennsylvania


WESTERVILLE,   HCN BCC          Financial Care   106        $9,026,982.00   Balanced Care,   Franklin
OHIO           Holdings, Inc.   Investors of                                Westerville      County, Ohio
                                Westerville,
                                LLC

MORRISTOWN,    HCN BCC          Financial Care   60         $4,191,291.00   Balanced Care,   Hamblen
TENNESSEE      Holdings, Inc.   Investors of                                Morristown       County,
                                Morristown,                                                  Tennessee
                                LLC

OAK RIDGE,     HCN BCC          Financial Care   60         $4,498,968.00   Balanced Care,   Anderson
TENNESSEE      Holdings, Inc.   Investors of                                Oak Ridge        County,
                                Oak Ridge,                                                   Tennessee
                                LLC

SAGAMORE       HCN BCC          Financial Care   103        $8,315,468.00   Balanced Care,   Summit
HILLS, OHIO    Holdings, Inc.   Investors of                                Sagamore Hills   County, Ohio
                                Sagamore Hills,
                                LLC
</TABLE>