alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 18, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227, or (414) 231-2360. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 4 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, November 18, 2008, at 1 p.m., Central Time via a telephone conference call. You can submit written comments to the panel by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. Please contact Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.                 

*The agenda will include the following:*                     Various IRS issues.                 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Roy L. Block, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-23629 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

EXHIBIT 10.a.1
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS    
    



        We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92229) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Biovail Corporation, of our reports dated April 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Biovail Corporation prepared in
accordance with Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles that are included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F), for the year ended December 31, 2003. 


        Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule of Biovail Corporation included on Page S-1 of the Annual Report (Form 20-F). This
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. 



	 	 	/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
	Toronto, Canada	 	ERNST & YOUNG LLP
	May 14, 2004	 	Chartered Accountants




III-4











QuickLinks


EXHIBIT 10.a.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
EXHIBIT 4.7

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT,  dated May 14, 2004
(the "First Amendment"),  is by and between I-Element,  Inc. (the "Consultant"),
and Reality Wireless Networks, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

      A. The  Consultant  and the  Client  entered  into a  Consulting  Services
Agreement  dated January 16, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A (the "Agreement"),  pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

      B.  Client and  Consultant  wish to amend  Section 2 of the  Agreement  to
provide for  additional  consideration  in exchange  for  additional  consulting
services.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of  the  foregoing,  and  the  mutual
agreements, representations,  warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other  good  and  valuable   consideration   the  receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.  Section 2 of the  Agreement  shall be deleted in its  entirety and is hereby
amended to read as follows:

"2. Consideration.

      Client  agrees  to pay  Consultant,  as his fee and as  consideration  for
services provided, 12,000,000 shares of common stock of the Client, which shares
shall be registered on Form S-8. By amendment dated May 14, 2004,  Client agrees
to pay  Consultant  an  additional  12,500,000  shares  of  common  stock of the
Client."

<PAGE>

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                              CLIENT:

                              REALITY WIRELESS NETWORKS, INC.


                              By:
                                  --------------------------------
                              Name: Steve Careaga
                              Its: CEO


                              CONSULTANT:

                              I-ELEMENT, INC.


                              By:
                                  --------------------------------
                              Name: Ivan Zweig
                                    Its:
Case 1:11-cv-02418-WYD-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02418-WYD-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02418-WYD-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02418-WYD-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02418-WYD-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/14/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
Equifax Inc. Stock Option Exchange Program
                              Terms and Conditions

o        Eligibility to  participate is limited to Vice  Presidents and above or
         as  otherwise  determined  by  the  Compensation  and  Human  Resources
         Committee ("the Committee").

o        The  election  to defer is  voluntary,  must be made each year,  and is
         irrevocable  as of  March  15  (or  other  date  as  prescribed  by the
         Committee each year).

o        Election must be made in the form of a percentage  of annual  incentive
         award earned,  and if  participating,  may be in any amount between 10%
         and 100%, in whole 5% increments.

o        Grant will be Equifax Inc. non-qualified stock options.

o        Options are immediately vested in full on the grant date.

o        Grant  date will be the date of the  Committee  meeting  in  January or
         February  following  the end of the  fiscal  year for which the  annual
         incentive award was earned.

o        Option  price will be at fair market  value at the close of the NYSE on
         the day of the Committee meeting.

o        If  applicable,  currency  conversion  rates will be established at the
         close of business on the day of the Committee meeting.

o        Option term is 10 years from grant date or expires sooner as follows:

         -        Terminates 5 years following  retirement,  death or disability
                  termination,  or after  termination,  other  than  for  cause,
                  following a change in control of the Company  (unless  10-year
                  option term expires sooner);

         -        Terminates   one  year  following   termination   due  to  job
                  elimination (unless 10-year option term expires sooner);

         -        Terminates    immediately    following   grantee's   voluntary
                  termination;

         -        Terminates  immediate  following  grantee's   termination  for
                  cause.


o        Option is non-transferable.

o        Option grant will be determined as follows:

                  % of Cash Incentive                Dollar Value of Stock
                       Exchanged                        Option Grant
                  -------------------                ---------------------

                       10% -- 20%                 6 x Cash Incentive Exchanged

                       25% -- 45%                 8 x Cash Incentive Exchanged

                       50% -- 100%                10 x Cash Incentive Exchanged
(August 30, 1990)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Dawson, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (James Leif, J., at trial and sentence), rendered on November 12, 1987, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing defendant, as a second violent felony offender, to 6 to 12 years’ imprisonment on each of the robbery counts and 3 *Vi*to 7 years on the weapon count, all terms to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

Even if the challenged statements that defendant discarded a gun and a radio were not admissible under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule (see, *People v Nieves,*67 NY2d 125, 135), their admission can be deemed harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt. Not only was there ample evidence connecting defendant to the stolen radio and the gun used in the robbery, but defendant was identified near the scene, almost immediately after the robbery, and fled when he saw the police. Moreover, the remainder of the evidence, even without these statements, clearly warrants an inference that the items were dropped during the police officers’ pursuit of defendant.

Pursuant to a stipulation, dated February 21, 1990, between *the*District Attorney and counsel for appellant, the parties agreed that the ballistics lab request form filled out by the police officer was the duplicative equivalent of the complaint report. This resolves the *Rosario*issue for which this matter was remitted and the appeal held in abeyance.

We have examined the remaining issues raised by appellant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the 
ACRS Subcommittee on US-APWR; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on the US-APWR will hold a meeting on October 
23-24, 2008, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
    The meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception 
of a portion that may be closed to protect information that is 
proprietary to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and its contractors 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4).
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Thursday, October 23, 2008--8 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Friday, October 24, 2008--8 a.m.-12 noon.
    The Subcommittee will review five topical reports and a draft 
Safety Evaluation Report associated with the US-APWR Design 
Certification Application. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by 
and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Mitsubishi 
Heavy Industries, Ltd., and other interested persons regarding this 
matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant 
issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as 
appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Neil Coleman, (Telephone: 301-415-7656) five days prior to the meeting, 
if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted. Detailed procedures for the conduct of 
and participation in ACRS meetings were published in the Federal 
Register on September 26, 2007 (72 FR 54695).
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: September 29, 2008.
Girija Shukla,
Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
 [FR Doc. E8-23537 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Catherine Schoen, Appellant, v King Kullen Grocery Co., Inc., Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 554]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated September 4, 2001, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While shopping for groceries in the defendant’s store, the plaintiff slipped and fell to the floor. She testified at an examination before trial that the fall occurred as she was reaching for tea on a shelf, when she stepped with her left foot onto a flat piece of cardboard on the floor, which slid. She further testified that when she entered the aisle with her grocery cart, she saw flat pieces of cardboard on the floor near the shelves, and a stock boy who was unpacking boxes. The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the flat cardboard on the floor did not constitute an inherently dangerous condition and “was readily observable by the reasonable use of the injured plaintiffs senses” *(Connor v Taylor Rental Ctr.,*278 AD2d 270; *see Chiranky v Marshalls, Inc.,*273 AD2d 266; *Maravalli v Home Depot U.S.A.,*266 AD2d 437; *Boehme v Edgar Fabrics,*248 AD2d *487344). Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant *(see Sandler v Patel,*288 AD2d 459). Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James G. Edwards, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant *942from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered August 4, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIUMAN WAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71579

Agency No. A075-759-065

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Xiuman Wan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

FILED

APR 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
09-71579

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v.

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review. 

The record does not compel the conclusion that Wan established changed

circumstances to excuse the delay in filing her asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. §

1208.4(a)(4); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-658 (9th Cir. 2007) (per

curiam). Accordingly, her asylum claim fails.

With respect to Wan’s withholding of removal claim, substantial evidence

supports the agency’s conclusion that Wan failed to establish past persecution

where police detained, questioned, and hit her once, and where she was

subsequently fired from her job and required to report to the police. See Gu v.

Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1021 (9th Cir. 2006); Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012,

1016 (9th Cir. 2003) (stating that the fact petitioner was fired from her job because

of her religious beliefs, while discriminatory, is not the type of economic

deprivation that rises to the level of persecution). Additionally, the record does not

compel the conclusion that Wan has established a clear probability of future

persecution. See Ramadan, 479 F.3d at 658. Accordingly, Wan’s withholding of

removal claim fails. 
09-71579

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Wan failed

to establish a likelihood of torture if returned to China. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at

1068. Accordingly, Wan’s CAT claim fails. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Corporation


The following bank subsidiary is a national bank and is organized under the laws
of the United States:

         First National Bank in Manitowoc

The following non-bank subsidiaries are organized under the laws of the State of
Wisconsin and are subsidiaries of first National Bank in Manitowoc:

         United Financial Services, Inc. (data center subsidiary)
         Insurance Center of Manitowoc, Inc. (insurance agency subsidiary)

The following non-bank subsidiary is organized under the laws of the State of
Nevada and is a subsidiary of First National Bank in Manitowoc:

         FNBM Investment Corp. (investment subsidiary)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). I L/RESEARCH 09- 15220 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S E R GE I P OR T NO Y, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F W O O D L A N D ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15220 D . C . N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 5 2 6 - J A MJ FM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry 16, 2010 B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S e r ge i P ortnoy appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g c iv il r ig h ts v io la tio n s in c o n n e c tio n w ith h is 

# FI LED MA R 03 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSI L/RESEARCH 09- 15220 2 a rr e s t. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . H olcom be v. H

osm er , 4 7 7 F. 3 d 1 0 9 4 , 1 0 9 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the cl ai m s a gai nstthe di stri ctatt orney w ho m ade the deci si on t o p rose cut e P ortno y bec ause thatdeci si on i s prot ec t ed u n d er th e d o ctri n e o f ab so l u t e p ro secu t o ri al i m m u n i ty. See Kal i na v. Fletcher , 522 U . S . 118, 129 ( 1997) T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the F ou rth A m endm entcl ai m s that po l i ce offi ce rs l ac ked p robabl e c ause t o arr es tP ortno y bec ause the re cord e s tab lis h e s th a t h e h a d af u ll a n d f a iro p p o rtu n ityto litig a te th a t is s u e a t h is p r e lim in a ry h e a r in g ; c o n s e q u e n tly h e is c o lla te r a llye s to p p e d f r o m r e - litig a tin g th is i s s ue i n as ubs e que nta c t i on. See H a u p t v. D i l la rd , 17 F . 3d 28 5, 28 8-90 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 4 ) ( c o n c lu d in g th a t af u ll a n d f a iro p p o rtu n ityto litig a te p r o b ab le c au s e to a rr e s ta tpr e l i m i na ry he a r i ng i n ac r i m i na l c a s e c ol l a t e r a l l y e s t ops r e - l i t i ga t i on of thati ss ue i n a subsequentac t i on ). P ortno y’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A p p e lle e ’s r e q u e s t f

o rju d ic ia l n o tic e o f

th e c r im in a l in f

o rm a tio n in P ortnoy ’ s c r i m i na l c a s e i s gr a nt e d. AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,060)
<INVENTORY>                                     48,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,376
<PP&E>                                          65,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,802)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,504
<BONDS>                                         24,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,112
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,760
<SALES>                                        161,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,286
<CGS>                                          103,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,423
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,677
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,901
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>