alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 58723]


Order Extending Emergency Order Pursuant to Section 12(K)(2) of 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Taking Temporary Action To Respond 
to Market Developments

October 2, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 12(k)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Exchange Act''),\1\ on September 18, 2008, the Securities and 
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') issued an Emergency Order (the 
``Order'') that prohibited persons from selling short the securities of 
financial institutions. The Order became effective at 12:01 a.m. E.D.T. 
on September 19, 2008 and is currently set to terminate at 11:59 p.m. 
E.D.T. on October 2, 2008.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(k)(2).
    \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58592 (Sept. 18, 
2008); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58611 (Sept. 21, 
2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to our authority under Section 12(k)(2)(C) of the Exchange 
Act, we are extending the Order. Section 12(k)(2)(C) authorizes the 
Commission to extend an emergency order issued pursuant to Section 
12(k)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act for a total effective period of up to 
30 calendar days, if the Commission finds that the emergency still 
exists and determines that an extension is necessary in the public 
interest and for the protection of investors to maintain fair and 
orderly securities markets.
    We have carefully reevaluated the current state of the markets and 
we remain concerned about the potential for sudden and excessive 
fluctuations of securities prices generally and disruption in the 
functioning of the securities markets that could threaten fair and 
orderly markets. We intend the prohibition to restore investor and 
market confidence by preventing short selling from being used to drive 
down the prices of securities in financial institutions even where 
there is no fundamental basis for a price decline other than general 
market conditions. Thus, we have determined in this environment that 
the standards under Section 12(k)(2) for extending the Order have been 
met. Accordingly, we have determined that extending the Order is in the 
public interest and necessary to maintain fair and orderly securities 
markets and for the protection of investors.
    It is therefore ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(k)(2)(C) of 
the Exchange Act, the Order is extended such that it will terminate at 
the earlier of (i) three business days from the President's signing of 
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424), or (ii) 
11:59 p.m. E.D.T. on Friday, October 17, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23862 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

p0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148102(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148102

COA: 316526

Oakland CC: 87-079714-FC

DENNIS CLARK RUNNER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 28, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11


                       NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                June 30,
                                                           ------------------
                                                            1998       1997
                                                           -------    -------
<S>                                                        <C>        <C>  
Average number of common shares outstanding .............    9,031      7,026

Common equivalent shares outstanding:

Stock options (1) .......................................       --         --
                                                           -------    -------

Total common and common equivalent shares outstanding ...    9,031      7,026
                                                           =======    =======

Net income (loss) attributed to common shareholders .....  $(4,330)   $   159
                                                           =======    =======

Loss per common share (basic and diluted) ...............  $ (0.48)   $  0.02
                                                           =======    =======
</TABLE>

------------

(1)   Stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per common
      share as the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              856,791
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       842,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                        221,957
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,465,681
<PP&E>                                            1,496,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                      270,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,138,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,656,945
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             24,072
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,457,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,138,175
<SALES>                                           1,844,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,844,466
<CGS>                                               655,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       655,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,970,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (764,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (774,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (774,120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0
        


</TABLE>
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

2

“[#15]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00368-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

A Notice of Disposition and Motion Requesting Change of Plea Hearing

[#15]2

 was filed on November 4, 2011. After reviewing the notice and the file, the court

has concluded that a telephonic setting conference should be held to set this matter for

a change of plea hearing.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on November 15, 2011, commencing at 10:00 a.m., the court shall

conduct a telephonic setting conference to set this matter for a change of plea hearing;

2. That counsel for the government shall arrange, initiate, and coordinate the

conference call necessary to facilitate the setting conference; and

3. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for November 18, 2011, and the

jury trial set to commence November 21, 2011, are VACATED.

Dated: November 7, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements  of Obie  Media Corporation,  which  are  included  in its
quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB for the quarter ended  August 31, 1999, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                               421,460
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      7,402,747
<ALLOWANCES>                         421,668
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  10,247,392
<PP&E>                            15,919,911
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,914,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    28,892,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              6,197,906
<BONDS>                            6,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                          16,607,905
<OTHER-SE>                           111,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      28,892,499
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  25,369,716
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     18,266,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   1,086,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   846,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,319,448
<INCOME-TAX>                         904,584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                1,414,864
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       1,414,864
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.32


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Obie Media Corporation (the Company )
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Gary F.
Livesay, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/GARY F. LIVESAY
    ------------------
    Gary F. Livesay
    Vice President
    Chief Financial Officer































                                       27
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service 

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2008 Revision, published July 1, 2008, at 73 FR 37644. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the following company: Brierfield Insurance Company (NAIC # 10993). 

*Business Address:*                     6300 University Parkway, Sarasota, FL 34240.                 

*Phone:*                     (800) 226-3224. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $386,000. SURETY LICENSES c/: AL, AR, MS, TN. INCORPORATED IN: Mississippi.                 

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2008 Revision, to reflect this addition. 

Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety business, and other information. 

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570*.                 

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782. 

Dated: September 29, 2008. 

Vivian L. Cooper, 

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. E8-23593 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending March 31, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBNCCORP, INC.                                                                                                           CICChange in Control Notice by MVC Private Equity Fund, L.P., Purchase, New York, to gain control of BNCCORP, Inc., Bismarck, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly gain control of BNC National Bank, Glendale, Arizona.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableIPSWICH COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                      * 3A1Ipswich Community Bancshares, Inc., Ipswich, South Dakota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of Yellowstone Trail Bancorporation, Ipswich, South Dakota, which owns Ipswich State Bank, Ipswich, South Dakota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/27/2012KERKHOVEN BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                              CICChange in Control Notice by Sharon Bauman, Apple Valley, Minnesota, Virginia Bauman, Farmington, Minnesota, and Michael Murray, Irving, Texas, as individuals, to acquire and retain 10 percent or more of the voting shares of Kerkhoven Bancshares, Inc., Kerkhoven, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire and retain control of Financial Security Bank, Kerkhoven, Minnesota.  In addition, Sharon Bauman, Virginia Bauman, Michael Murray, Florence Bauman, and Russell Bauman, to join the Bauman family control group which controls Kerkhoven Bancshares, Inc., Kerkhoven, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly controls Financial Security Bank, Kerkhoven, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/10/2012LEACKCO BANK HOLDING COMPANY, INC.                                                                                      * 18C
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof World Heart Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, John A. Martin, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation as of September 30, 2009.

 
| Dated:   November 16, 2009 | /s/ J.  Alex Martin                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | J.  Alex Martin, President and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

“This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q towhich it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCorporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”

 

----
2011112355

1皿 III‖1柵 |‖ IIIlll11胴 ‖IVIII III

12ノ 12/2011 1

3effe rson

COMBINED COURT. 」EFFERSON COUNTY COLORAD0

0ourt Address

100 」efferson County Parkway

Golden, C0 80401‐ 6002

1144=15 AM l Page(s)

county′ CoLorado

R Sll.00

D 30.00

JUD flEo 0 5 2ol:

Nur「・ber: 1lCV-002134 r 5

Ca se

Dr v.

Plainti ff MAGNANI′ GEORGE

Defendant DALTON. MARIE

TRANSCRIPT OF 」υOCMENT

Original 」udgment Amount S910.356 44 Judgment Date: November 18. 2011

Revi Ved 」udgment Amount_ 5 00 Judgment Date:

」udgment Status UNSATISFIED

Additi ona] Rema rks

3UDGMENT PLUS ATTY'S FEES & COSTS T0 8E ASSESSED HEREAFT[R PLUS

POST― 」UDGMENTINTEREST FROM THE DATE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AT THE RATE OF 8% PER

ANNUM

Debtor(s) MARIE DALTON. 927 COLE STREET. GOLDEN, C0 80401

Creditor(s): GEORCE MACNANI

Balance of Judgment to Date $910.356 44

I hereby certrfy that the above ts a true and complete transcrlpt of the

Judgment rn the above- referenced case whlch 1s retained tn my offlce

ョ GOVERNMENT

塵 EXHIBIT

,

奎 15

DATE_ Decenber 01. 2011

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-15 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1

of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1447

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as successor by merger 

to Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

 Defendant – Appellant,

and

WELL SERVICE GROUP, INC.; JOSHUA UNDERWOOD; DIAMOND 

TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00104-IMK)

Submitted: November 26, 2014 Decided: December 8, 2014

Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth M. Portner, WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON FIRES & 

NEWBY, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Brian S. Kane, 

Matthew A. Meyers, DAPPER, BALDASARE, BENSON, BEHLING & KANE, 
2

P.C., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina 

(Selective) appeals from the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment in favor of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company 

(Nationwide) in Nationwide’s declaratory judgment action against 

Selective seeking a declaration from the court that Nationwide 

had no duty to defend or indemnify Selective’s insureds with 

respect to any claim arising out of an October 2012 automobile

accident. Finding no error, we affirm.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment 

de novo, viewing the facts and drawing reasonable inferences in 

the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Halpern v. 

Wake Forest Univ. Health Scis., 669 F.3d 454, 460 (4th Cir. 

2012). Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no 

genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 

56(a). A district court should grant summary judgment unless a 

reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party 

on the evidence presented. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 

U.S. 242, 249 (1986).

With these standards in mind, we have reviewed the 

record and examined each of Selective’s claims and conclude that 

they are without merit. The district court correctly applied 

Pennsylvania law to conclude that Selective’s insured, Well 
4

Service Group, Inc. (WSG), was the sole owner of the vehicle 

involved in the October 2012 accident and that Nationwide had no 

duty to defend or indemnify WSG or its employee with respect to 

any claim arising out of the accident. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We grant Nationwide’s unopposed motion to file a surreply brief, 

and consider the brief tendered with the motion. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:11-cv-02223-BNB Document 2 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02223-BNB Document 2 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02223-BNB Document 2 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02223-BNB Document 2 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4