alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.13**

**HPSC, INC.**

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE HPSC, INC. 2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

 

 

**WHEREAS,**HPSC, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the HPSC, Inc.2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain eligibleemployees and directors;

 

**WHEREAS,**the Company desires to amend the Plan to extend thepost-termination exercise expiration for Director options.

 

**NOW THEREFORE,**the Plan is hereby amended as follows

 

1.                                       Paragraph 5 (b)(iii) is hereby deletedand the following section 5(b)(iii) is substituted therefor:

 

                EachDirector Option shall terminate and may no longer be exercised upon theearliest of (1) ten years after the date of grant, and (2) immediately upontermination of the Participant’s Service for cause.  The Board’s good faith determination of whether the terminationof a Director Participant’s Service was for cause shall be binding for purposesof the Plan.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**the Company has caused this Amendment to be executedby its duly authorized officer this 24th day of October, 2001.

 

 

**HPSC,INC.**

 
| By:    |   | /s/ John W. Everets                                  |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | John W. Everets                                      |
|   |   | Chairman of the  Board and

Chief Executive  Officer |

 

 

 

 

 

----
Case 1:11-cv-01970-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01970-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01970-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01970-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families 

# AGENCY:

Office of Child Support Enforcement, ACF, DHHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice to award a sole-source discretionary grant. 

*CFDA#:*                     93.564.                 

*Legislative Authority:*                     Section 1115 of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C.1315] provides funds and authority to award grants to State IV-D agencies for experimental, pilot, or demonstration projects.                 

*Amount of Award:*                     $703,000.00.                 

*Project Period:*                     September 30, 2008-February 27, 2010.                 

# SUMMARY:

A sole-source discretionary grant is being awarded to the Office of the Attorney General, Texas, to provide marriage and relationship education, parenting skills training, case management and home-visiting activities to unwed, new or expectant parents in Tom Green and Harris counties, Texas. The project will examine child support outcomes of families in the treatment and control groups from this project and from a previous project. This grant will also enable collection of data on child well-being outcomes, such as number of well-baby health visits, immunizations, home-safety (using a standardized checklist completed by a home visitor), child development (using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, a standardized tool), and quality of the home environment. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Myles Schlank, Supervisory Program Specialist, Office of Child Support Enforcement, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20047. Telephone:                               ( print page 57634)                            (202) 401-9329, e-mail:                         *myles.schlank@acf.hhs.gov.*

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Donna Bonar, 

Deputy Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

[FR Doc. E8-23310 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                                 TBC CORPORATION

                                              State of Incorporation /
            Name of Subsidiary                    Organization
            ------------------                ------------------------
            TBC Private Brands, Inc                   Delaware

            Big O Tires, Inc.                         Nevada

            Big O Tire of Idaho, Inc.                 Idaho

            Carroll's, Inc.                           Georgia

            Merchant's, Incorporated                  Delaware

            NTW Incorporated                          Delaware

            TBC Brands, LLC                           Delaware

            TBC Capital, LLC                          Delaware

            TBC International Inc.                    Delaware

            TBC Retail Enterprises, Inc.              Delaware

            Tire Kingdom, Inc.                        Florida

            TBC Private Brands of Texas, LLC          Delaware

Certain other subsidiaries have not been listed because they would not, if
considered in the aggregate as one subsidiary, constitute a "significant
subsidiary," as defined in Rule 1.02(w) of Regulation S-X.

                                    73 of 79
#### Gregory LANGADINOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF TOURO COLLEGE, Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, Trustees Touro College, Daniel Hutt, Douglas D. Scherer, Howard A. Glickstein, Kenneth Rosenblum, Dan Subotnik, Carol Rosenbaum, and Amir Robinson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7800.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Aug. 13, 2003.

Gregory Langadinos, Medford, MA, pro se.

*96Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York, NY, for Appellees.

Present: RPOOLER, SACK, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Gregory Langadinos, appearing pro se, appeals from the judgment of the District Court of the Eastern District of New York (Platt, J.), dated May 31, 2002, dismissing his complaint pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) and enjoining him from filing further pleadings, motions, or appeals against the defendants without first obtaining the written permission of a judge or clerk of that court.

Mr. Langadinos was a student at the Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center at Touro College. He brought this suit in response to certain actions taken by the law school regarding his academic performance. He asserts claims under, inter aha, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, *et seq.,*and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, *et seq.*

Upon our review of the record, and after hearing oral argument, we affirm the district court’s judgment in full. We especially admonish Mr. Langadinos to heed the terms of the district court’s injunction. Failure to do so may result in more severe sanctions, including monetary sanctions.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 22, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00503-CV

GWENDOLYN GABRIEL, Appellant

V.

MERRY OUTLAW, Appellee

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-02456

ORDER

We GRANT John D. Nation’s March 19, 2019 unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel 

for appellant Gwendolyn Gabriel in this appeal. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to (1) remove 

Mr. Nation as counsel for Ms. Gabriel in this cause number and (2) send future communications 

in this case to Ms. Gabriel at 1160 South Joe Wilson, Cedar Hill, Texas 75104.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: September 30, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HERMAN SANCHEZ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

GREG LEWIS, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-16962

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02134-KJM-CKD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2014 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and CURIEL, District

Judge.** 

Petitioner Herman Sanchez appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner challenges the

FILED

OCT 03 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
California Superior Court’s denial of his motion for discovery of a correctional

officer’s personnel file for evidence of untruthfulness (“Pitchess motion”) without

first conducting an in camera review. This court does not directly review

questions of state evidence law, Jammal v. Van de Kamp, 926 F.2d 918, 919 (9th

Cir. 1991), and Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the state court’s

adjudication of his claim was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application

of, clearly established Federal law.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). 

AFFIRMED.
#### W. E. DOUBERLY, Appellant, v. Hal H. PLAYTER, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

Feb. 26, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11454 and #11455]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 09/25/2008. *Incident:*
                         Apartment Building Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         09/19/2008.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         09/25/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/24/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/25/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Montgomery. *Contiguous Counties:* Pennsylvania: Berks, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Lehigh, Philadelphia. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.750Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11454 5 and for economic injury is 11455 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Pennsylvania. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) September 25, 2008. Sandy K. Baruah, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. E8-23464 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the registered holders of ML-CFC Commercial

Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006-3,

Plaintiff,

v.

GLENWOOD HOSPITALITY, INC.,

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF ARKANSAS, LLC,

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF COLORADO, LLC,

GERALD R. SPRONG, and

W.A. COLIN NOBLE,

Defendants.

HOSPITALITY RECEIVER, LLC,

Receiver.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendant W.A. Colin Noble’s Unopposed

Motion of Defendant W.A. Colin Noble for Leave to Appear by Telephone at

Scheduling Conference [Docket No. 52; Filed May 23, 2012] (the “Motion”). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#52] is GRANTED. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Defendant W.A. Colin Noble may

appear by telephone at the Scheduling Conference on May 30, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. by

dialing the Court at 303-335-2770. If any other parties are granted leave to appear

telephonically, these parties must initiate a conference call between themselves and

counsel for Defendant W.A. Colin Noble before dialing the Court.

Dated: May 24, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM Document 56 Filed 05/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
2009095532 09724/200003:29:32 PM

鍮 v

WARRANTY DFIIn

“

DE匡 ede IIIに00m●り or」une,2o,... ■

OANA D OuEVrHNERハ NO MADONNAB OU― ER

of“ Cow“ Jけr■RSON,― dC― .llBR● にヽa“

mRIE CLALTON

m030日脚 3-・ 927● OLE o:卜 にし1.●ddon.CO I1401

d“ ConofFttnSON,― ご

...

,

...

RECORDER'S STAMP

\Mn€SS, tr.t tE grfi{or(.), tu ..rd h onffii of 0E sr d Mtr Htrt hd ftft,-e Thq!.. , . d (nll(o.

(.Sr.(D(IOOL tr t!..bt rld ,rfi*E, or*id! b har$r..bouLdrd, t|.rrh. g.. r.d, D.tf*Ed, rold .td c.ftrFd, td

iv traaa 9aladt *{..) g * !*tr dt 6n!t and aorffi lJnb 0r gflta+ lne haft rd aadfB fclrq, C 0E tEl

D-|!p.g 6gdrar wft ri9ltr/rfiqtt, tr .ry, tlntaD, ttlg tld t*l! h Cai/nty a(.EFFERSON ad slic ol coL.rdo, Aaq&.d -

iulor,!:

PARCEL B. E(EMPTON SJFIVEY SEqTION O, TOWNSHIP ' SOUT}I, R^NGE @ IIJEX'I, EI E.983

ACCORDII{G TO THE EXE ,lPnON S1JFIVEY RECORDED .jUNE 4. 139' AT RECEPTION NO. 9@71644 IN

AOOI( 1I3 AT PAGE 26, COUNTY OF JEfFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.

dso knoi,n by d sd ,!nD.r I grf, CCnE gTREEt, GOLOEN, CO €OaO, ,

TOGETHER $.10r all ,nd ttl€irF $t tstd llrlt id a9Brbnncaa tErqrlo bdoqgilo. 6 io -t dt tFdlJtthg, !|a

,!!lrdcr {ld rflaaiorla, n tttdaa sttd IstEhdeq raltr LaL aal(l pft6B Galtar, ltc aI 116 oeta. dg& illb liiilat d*n

-d d.'rErd rhdcvlf of fi. gr.ito(.), .&r.' in h, (r qt*r. of, nq tld io lho tDo\,! brBnnEd Fitli.6. rt& tla

,E !(trrttDflb .nd rBrtt.atc,

TO HA\/E Ar{D TO ttoto 6c dd ,.riitsra alot . b.!Flh.d srld d{aatDclr, Yatt lh. Tf uftn&o*, unro t 9.rtl6.3| !h.f

he&r !.ld irlgll tollyer. And tlc OrBr o(.), hr n'./tE!.t, Ii,tdr h.r! and taraord lcarc$rirt'.. do(ct) oo,!Ett, gt-t

Daraah end a_q!c to ad .d l lio 9r-{46, U€n ndt .,ld aaatF, tBt d ffE tilp ot 0l. ita.aig and d!f,Y.ry oa IE

Dr*nta ar! lidl .aEad of t|6 Errnb.s .!or. qrnt 4 har.tLd good, iJtB, plaf€d .bdllE ,ld hd.rodL .ct t d

hh€dt8.e. h t , h bc .thDL, 3d hwa/fd good ri!r!. ful Do$E ild hqli, alo|cty b €n t, b<!.h, id aid asr,€y ri6

sdra in nE.ll|er .d fcm &rd4 ard ftal 6a l{rp .rr fG ]ld d... tqr dl ftnrF td o0E grsnts, hqgdGt ElGs. li!.E

&.. aar.srr$b, .'Ernbmc- .nd ,r&aao,B d Y,ltshrsr End or Gdrr! t€vst, D(cEgr FoR TA,\ES FoR I]€

CURRE}IT YEAR AND SI'BSEOIJENT YEARS, EASETEXTS. RESERVATIOTIS, RESTRICNONS, CO\./€MNiS AI*)

RIG+fiS4F-WAY OF RF@RD F A,{Y; ATO DE,fRIBJnON UNUTY EAS€UENTq ATD MATTERS NOT SHOwr{ R' TIE

PUBLIC RECOROS BUT OF ''TITIICTI 

GMNTEE I.IAS ACII]AL KNOffTDGE AND IXCLUSION OF THE PROPERW W]'T}IIN

ANY SPECTAI T&!NG DISTR|CT ATS SENEFITS ANO SURD€}ls OF AXY DECI.ARATION A'IO PARTY WA!

A6REE ,IENTII, IF AXYAND g.,B.ECITO THOS€ E(oEPTIO..|!I REFERREP TO IN TITLE INSURANCE COi'MITYENT NO,

@O}8?Bt ISS{'ED EY GI.IAFDIAN TITLE AGENCY. I!C.

SLte Doc FeeS93 60

dda cct torlh aDo{a

ト

讐撃:駕詳酔 ER

聰濯辮滞:岬 躙 零騒艦閣町轟 出蹴島馬詰罵:ょ 呵pan

― Or

|-3“ 郷 朧 整 Of"“■

-9-C‐ "Lul●

駅 III III 。(|“幽

“

●●ORS〉

Cu― nT“・・

20987●34

言 GOVERNMENT

L EXHIBIT

E 10

lry“け′′ゴ

"●・ヮ

“

7■餃い ′

u!'r{n d-eb

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-10 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1

of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-001953-BNB

ANTHONY HERNANDEZ

Applicant,

v.

STEVE HARTLY, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Motion

to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14) filed on October 11, 2011. On August 26, 2011, the Court

ordered Respondents to file a Pre-Answer Response limited to addressing the

affirmative defenses of timeliness under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) and/or exhaustion of state

court remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). Respondents were directed not to file

a dispositive motion as their Pre-Answer Response, or an Answer, or otherwise address

the merits of the claims in response to the Court’s August 26 Order.

In the Motion for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss, Respondents seek leave to file

a motion to dismiss limited to addressing the affirmative defense of timeliness. 

Respondents allege that this action clearly is time-barred and that, because the

Attorney General’s files from Applicant’s direct appeal and the appeal of other

postconviction motions have been destroyed as part of routine file management,

Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 17 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

obtaining copies of the documents necessary to address exhaustion of state remedies

would be an expensive endeavor.

Applicant responded to the Motion for Leave. He argues that Respondents’

motion to dismiss defies the August 26 Order to File a Pre-Answer Response. 

Applicant asserts that he filed a postconviction motion, out of time, on February 16,

1999, and demonstrated extraordinary circumstances which prevented him from filing a

postconviction motion in a timely manner. He, nonetheless, fails to assert with

specificity the steps he took to pursue his federal claims. Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d

925, 930 (10th Cir. 2008). Applicant bears the burden of demonstrating that equitable

tolling is appropriate. See Miller v. Marr, 141 F.3d 976, 978 (10th Cir. 1998). 

Under these unusual circumstances, the Court agrees that Respondents should

be allowed to file a motion to dismiss limited to addressing the affirmative defense of

timeliness. Applicant may respond to the Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss and

demonstrate that equitable tolling is appropriate. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss (Doc.

No. 14) filed on October 11, 2011, is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant may file a Response to the Motion to

Dismiss within twenty-one days from the date of this Order.

DATED November 21, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 17 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2