alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 146

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating the Great Falls Historic District in Paterson, New Jersey, as a unit of

the National Park System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 146 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Great Falls Historic

3 District Study Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING

5 GREAT FALLS HISTORIC DISTRICT,

6 PATERSON, NEW JERSEY.

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

8 (1) GREAT FALLS HISTORIC DISTRICT.—The

9 term ‘‘Great Falls Historic District’’ means the

10 Great Falls Historic District in the city of Paterson,

11 New Jersey, established as an historic district by

12 section 510 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

13 Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333;

14 110 Stat. 4158; 16 U.S.C. 461 note).

15 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

16 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di17 rector of the National Park Service.

18 (b) STUDY.—As soon as practicable after funds are

19 made available to carry out this section, the Secretary

20 shall commence a study regarding the suitability and feasi21 bility of further recognizing the historic and cultural sig22 nificance of the lands and structures of the Great Falls

23 Historic District through the designation of the Great

24 Falls Historic District as a unit of the National Park Sys25 tem.
3

HR 146 RFS

1 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section

2 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall

3 apply to the study required by this section.

4 (d) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit to the

5 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives

6 and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of

7 the Senate a report describing the results of the study.

8 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

9 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec10 essary to carry out this section.

Passed the House of Representatives May 9, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### Gerhard Becker, Respondent, v. James P. Fairley, Administrator of Mary Haggerty, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

April 29, 1890.

Practice, Appellate: affirmance for failure to file transcript. The fact that an administrator *de bonis non*is without funds belonging to ■ the estate, and, therefore, without means for the payment of the cost of a transcript of a cause appealed by his predecessor, is no reason why the judgment appealed from should not be affirmed for failure to file such transcript.

*Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.*— Hon. Geo. W. Lubke, Judge.

Affirmed.

Rombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff recovered judgment against Fairley as administrator in the circuit court, from which Fairley took an appeal to this court September 6, 1888. In January, 1889, Fairley’s letters of administration were revoked, and in January, 1890, Ten Broek was appointed administrator *de bonis non.*No transcript of the record was ever filed in this court by the appellant. The plaintiff now produces such transcript and moves for an affirmance of the judgment.

The only cause shown by Ten Broek, administrator, why the judgment should not be affirmed, is that his predecessor Fairley converted the assets of the estate to his own use, and there are no means of the estate whatever wherewith he could have paid for a transcript.

This statement is not even accompanied by an affidavit. .

*53An administrator in this state may appeal without' bond, and the appeal of itself operates as a supersedeas. This fact furnishes another reason why he, above all others, should be held to a diligent prosecution of his appeal. The statement shows no good cause against the affirmance of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02441-REB-BNB

ISADORE BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENVER POLICE OFFICER GARCIA,

DENVER POLICE OFFICER ROMAN YEPSHIN,

DENVER POLICE OFFICER SERGEY GUREVICH,

DETECTIVE JOEY SMITH, and

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, jointly and severally,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in

accordance with the Order Adopting Recommendations of the United States

Magistrate Judge [#77] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on December 10, 2012,

which order is incorporated herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#58] filed October 12,

2012, is GRANTED;

2. That plaintiff’s claims against all defendants are DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE;

3. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED on behalf of defendants, Denver Police Officer

Ben Garcia (identified in the caption as “Denver Police Officer Garcia”); Denver Police

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 78 Filed 12/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Officer Roman Yepshin; Denver Police Officer Sergey Gurevich; Detective Joey Smith;

and the City and County of Denver, jointly and severally, against plaintiff, Isadore Brown,

on all claims for relief and causes of action; provided that JUDGMENT IS WITH

PREJUDICE;

4. That the defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the

Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 10th day of December, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 78 Filed 12/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Charles E. NEWSOME, Appellant, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 28, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Giga-tronics Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George
H. Bruns, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| |                                                                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ GEORGE H. BRUNS, JR.
George H. Bruns, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
May 27, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Giga-tronics and will be retained by Giga-tronics and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

45
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-02484-CMA-BNB Date: August 8, 2013 

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401 

 Parties Attorney(s) 

BENJAMIN GODFREY CHIPPS, SR. Phil C. Pearson 

 Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Juan G. Villasenor

 Defendant(s) 

COURTROOM MINUTES 

MOTIONS HEARING

Court in Session: 2:58 p.m. 

Appearance of counsel. 

Argument presented on [30] Motion for Leave to Designate Out of Time Non-Parties at Fault. 

For reasons stated on the record it is, 

ORDERED: [30] Motion for Leave to Designate Out of Time Non-Parties at Fault is 

DENIED. 

Court in Recess: 3:22 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:24 

Case 1:11-cv-02484-CMA-BNB Document 37 Filed 08/08/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Key
Tronic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 12, 2011



/s/ Ronald F. KlawitterRonald F. KlawitterExecutive Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for theyear ended March 31, 2008, as amended by this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date:  June 18, 2008 |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
|                      | /s/    | CHRISTOPHER  A. TWOMEY |
|                      |   | Christopher  A. Twomey, |
|                      |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13127-000]


Mississippi 24 Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

September 30, 2008.
    Mississippi 24 Hydro, LLC filed an application on March 3, 2008, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Mississippi River Lock and Dam No. 24 
Hydroelectric Project, which would be located near the town of 
Clarksville on the Mississippi River at the existing U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers' Lock and Dam No. 24 and Reservoir in Calhoun County, 
Illinois and Pike County, Missouri. The proposed project would utilize 
federal lands.
    The proposed Mississippi River Lock and Dam No. 24 Hydroelectric 
Project would utilize the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Lock and Dam 
No. 24 and would consist of the following new facilities: (1) An intake 
structure, (2) a powerhouse containing 3 generating units with a total 
installed capacity of 22.3 MW, (3) a 5-mile-long, 46 kV underground 
transmission line, connecting to an existing power line, and (4) 
appurtenant facilities. The project would have an annual generation of 
241 gigawatts-hours, which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Brent Smith, Mississippi 24 Hydro, LLC, 975 
South State Highway, Logan, UT 84321; phone: (435) 752-2580.
    FERC Contact: Tom Papsidero, (202) 502-6002.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13127) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-23503 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

 Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland 

Case No. 11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB 

MOSCH MINING COMPANY 

ALVIN MOSCH 

PATRICIAL MOSCH 

DAVID MOSCH 

Plaintiffs 

v. 

JOHN HENRY 

UNITED STATES REAL ESTATE CORP 

Defendants 

 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS 

Counsel for the plaintiff shall arrange pick up and retain custody of all exhibits 

submitted at the September 27, 2012 Show Cause Hearing. Counsel is further ordered to 

retain exhibits until such time as all need for the exhibits has terminated and the time to 

appeal has expired or all appellate proceedings have been terminated plus sixty days. 

Counsel may pick up items at the Clerk of Court’s Office, 901 19th Street, Room 

A-105, Denver, CO 80294. Further inquiries may be directed to the Courtroom Deputy 

Clerk, Julie Dynes, at 303.271.2061. 

DATED November 7, 2012. 

BY THE COURT: 

 s/ Boyd N. Boland _______________ 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02438-PAB-BNB Document 146 Filed 11/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1352 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1352


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, as the ``Dr. Francis 
                    Townsend Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. 
Francis Townsend Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate May 23, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MANUEL A. COLON

- MONTANER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D 2023

- 2239

[ August 15, 2024 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County; August A. Bonavita, Judge; L.T. Case No.

502023CT003823AXXXMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jaclyn Lopez, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. Solages

Jones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER

, C ONNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered September 21, 2015 

In The 

Qeourt of ~peal~ 

jfiftb ilBi~trict of 'Cltexa~ at mana~ 

No. 05-14-01381-CR 

WILLIAM SEDRIC AUTREY, Appellant 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 429-81194-10 . ~ ~===='"---"'-"'"---=~---o-...o-·..o~--~"-·-·=-=--=-"---"- - ·---~---- -- ~-~-=--.=--=.~--=---o,._. 

ORDER 

The Court DENIES appellant's September 17, 2015 pro se motion to dismiss appellate 

counsel. See Buntion v. Harmon, 827 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Sampson v. State, 

854 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1992, no pet.): see also Martinez v. Court of Appeals o('Cal.. 

Fourth Appellate !Jist., 528 U.S. 152 (2000). 

RECEIVED \N 

''(Jl\RT 0F ~DPU.LS, 5th OIST. 

nr'T n 5 ZOi5 

'i·.J' " 

u~.c, !V\ATZ 

·:l_fR.\1< St\l DISTRICT 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE 
([ourt of Apprals 

Btutrid of Wrxas at r!allas 

George L. Allen Sr. Courts Building 

600 Commerce Street Suite 200 

Dallas, Texas 75202 

' ··.,;\. 

,, ' 

,1, 

: .. /IJ.' 

7 5 2 0 2 @.6 6 3 

;: ! "'t'" 

l 

.;2:;: · 

PM t 

"'! )!,1::: 

NOT 

7'5eP ::;; '4..,_ J,, 

RETURN TO 

TO 

AS 

BC: 75282663150 

, ' H ' ll' ' jO c ; ' 

! •, ! l ' 11 ,, ' ' ; j ' ;' •.
Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 119 Filed 09/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Hycor Biomedical Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 Nos. 33-25427, 33-25428,
33-25429, 33-32767, 33-43280, 33-63798 and 33-63800 of our report dated February
19, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hycor Biomedical Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1999.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0603

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TRENT MATTHEW LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until June 23, 2022, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 19 2022

05/19/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0603
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,751
<INVENTORY>                                     80,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,211
<PP&E>                                          58,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,960
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,058
<BONDS>                                        164,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                       (628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,391
<SALES>                                        563,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               563,220
<CGS>                                          522,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (20)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (9)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>