alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 85 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 23, 2007.
    Resolved,  That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Wexler (to rank immediately after Mr. 
Donnelly).
    Committee on the Judiciary: Ms. Wasserman Schultz (to rank immediately after 
Mr. Davis of Alabama).
    Committee on Science and Technology: Mr. Kanjorski (to rank immediately 
after Mr. McNerney) and Ms. Hooley (to rank immediately after Mr. Kanjorski).
    Committee on Small Business: Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. 
Shuler, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Michaud, Ms. 
Bean, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Lipinski, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Braley 
of Iowa, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Ellsworth, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, and Mr. Sestak.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 10-SB/A of our
report included herein dated March 20, 2000, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Medsearch Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries.






/s/ KEMPISTY & COMPANY, CPAs, P.C.
Kempisty & Company
Certified Public Accountants PC
New York, NY
May 9, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Jacques Mot
                                           ------------------------
                                           Jacques Mot
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           November 30, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Zeev Koltovskoy, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*April 30, 2019          *

 

*/s/ ZEEV KOLTOVSKOY                                                 *

*ZEEV KOLTOVSKOY*

*CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER*

*(PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER)*

 

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO REGISTRANT AND WILL BE RETAINED BY REGISTRANT AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made and
entered into at Santa Barbara,  California, on the date hereinafter set forth by
and between JOHN M. PHILPOTT  (hereinafter  referred to as the  "Employee")  and
MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES,  a Delaware Corporation  (hereinafter referred to
as the "Employer").

WHEREAS:

     A. The Employer and the  Employee  are parties to an  Employment  Agreement
effective  as of March 20,  1995,  and  Amendments  No. 1 through 4 thereto (the
"Employment Agreement").

     B. The parties  hereto wish to amend the  Employment  Agreement  in certain
respects.

     NOW,   THEREFORE,   in   consideration   of  the  premises,   promises  and
representations hereinafter contained, it is agreed as follows:

     1. Effective JANUARY 1, 2000, the section entitled EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION on
Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

      EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

      ONE HUNDRED NINETY TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($192,500) per annum.

     2. In all other  respects,  the  Employment  Agreement is hereby  ratified,
confirmed and approved in its entirety.



                            SIGNATUARES ON NEXT PAGE


<PAGE>




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on this
25th day of January, 2000.

                                            EMPLOYER:
                                            MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
                                            a Delaware Corporation

                                            By: /s/ Gary S. Kledzik, Ph.D.
                                                --------------------------
                                                     Gary S. Kledzik, Ph.D.
                                                     C.E.O. and Chairman

                                            EMPLOYEE:

                                            /s/ John M. Philpott
                                            --------------------
                                                John M. Philpott
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1450 

To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance Council. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2007 

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the Housing Assistance 

Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Assistance 

5 Council Authorization Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE TO HOUSING ASSISTANCE COUNCIL. 

7 (a) USE.—The Secretary of Housing and Urban De8 velopment may provide financial assistance to the Housing 

9 Assistance Council for use by such Council to develop the 

10 ability and capacity of community-based housing developVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:08 May 23, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1450.IS S1450

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 1450 IS

1 ment organizations to undertake community development 

2 and affordable housing projects and programs in rural 

3 areas. Assistance provided by the Secretary under this sec4 tion may be used by the Housing Assistance Council for— 

5 (1) technical assistance, training, support, and 

6 advice to develop the business and administrative ca7 pabilities of rural community-based housing develop8 ment organizations; 

9 (2) loans, grants, or other financial assistance 

10 to rural community-based housing development orga11 nizations to carry out community development and 

12 affordable housing activities for low- and moderate13 income families; and 

14 (3) such other activities as may be determined 

15 by the Housing Assistance Council. 

16 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

17 authorized to be appropriated for financial assistance 

18 under this section for the Housing Assistance Council— 

19 (1) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and 

20 (2) $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009, 

21 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION

I, Brian F. Lavin, President of NTS
Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates IV, the general partner
of NTS-Properties IV (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| | 1. | The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the annual period ended
          December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 26, 2004

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital
Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates IV,
General Partner of NTS-Properties IV

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

CardioDynamics International Corporation: 

 

The audits referred to in our report dated January 20, 2004 included the related financial statement schedule as of November 30, 2003 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2003,included in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In ouropinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements Nos.333-40969, 333-38920, 333-38922 and 333-70902 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-31275, 333-65331, 333-69669, 333-69663, 333-69659, 333-86475, 333-88311, 333-88307, 333-88309, 333-31702, 333-44226, 333-66396, 333-69456, 333-69458, 333-70916 and 333-104236 onForm S-3 of CardioDynamics International Corporation of our report dated January 20, 2004, relating to the balance sheets of CardioDynamics International Corporation as of November 30, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations,shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2003, and the financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the November 30, 2003, Annual Report on Form 10-K of CardioDynamicsInternational Corporation. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

San Diego, California 

February 29, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.3.3

[Telergy Letterhead]

Via Facsimile
July 15, 1999

Niagara Mohawk Energy, Inc.
507 Plum street
Syracuse, NY 13204

            Re:         Amendment No. 2 to Conversion Rights Agreement and
                        Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement (11/10/98)

Dear Sirs:

            This letter confirms that we hereby amend the Conversion Rights
Agreement dated April 24, 1998 (as amended on November 10, 1998) to increase
Niagara Mohawk Energy's Minimum Interest as provided in paragraph 2 of the first
amendment to 10%.

            In exchange, Niagra Mohawk Energy hereby amends the Stock Purchase
Agreement dated November 10, 1998 as follows: (1) the Capital Return to be paid
under section 4.3(a) may be paid in cash or additional shares of Class A Common
Stock at the election of the Company rather than Niagara Mohawk Energy and (2)
in the event the Company is required to repurchase Niagara Mohawk Energy's
shares under section 4.3(b), the Company may fulfill that obligation by electing
to pay cash to repurchase the shares or by registering such shares for sale by
Niagara Mohawk Energy to the public.

            If this letter accurately reflects our agreement, kindly sign and
return by facsimile (518) 463-9937.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kevin J. Kelly
Kevin J. Kelly
Executive Vice President

Accepted and agreed to this 15th day of July
By Niagara Mohawk Energy, Inc.:

By:         /s/ Mathew J. Picardi
Title:      General Counsel and Secretary
#### Nathan B. FONTENOT v. TRADERS & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. et al.

No. 3055.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 23, 1948.

Atlee P. Stedder, of Valle Platte, for appellant.

Stafford *&*Pitts,, of Alexandria, and E. Herman Guillory, of Ville Platte, for ap-pellees.

DORE, Judge.

This case arises out of the same accident which gave rise to the suit of Mrs. Eunice Lafleur Perrodin v. R. G. Garland et als, and was consolidated for trial with the Perrodin case with the provision that separate decrees would be entered.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Perrodin v. Garland, La.App., *37*So.2d 896 it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
201 La. 1041

#### STATE v. SCALLAN.

No. 36734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 5, 1942.

*890S. Allen Bordelon, of Marksville, and Lessley P. Gardiner, of Opelousas, for relator.

Earl Edwards, Dist. Atty., of Marksville, for respondent.

PONDER, Justice.

In these habeas corpus proceedings, the relator Albert Scallan claims that he is being held under an illegal conviction and sentence. At the time these proceedings were filed in this Court, the relator applied for the writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus which were granted and a rule nisi issued. Upon hearing of the rule, this Court affirmed the conviction and sentence. State of Louisiana v. Albert Scallan, La.Sup., 10 So.2d 885.

Since the conviction and sentence involved in these proceedings have been upheld by this Court, this question is now a moot one.

For the reasons assigned, these proceedings are dismissed at the relator’s cost.
UNITED STAT ES COURT OF AP P EALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

N O
. 98-354
R I C HAR D D. S I MMONS , A PP EL L ANT ,

v. H ER SH EL W. G OBER , A C TI NG S EC RE T A RY O F V ET ER A N S A FF A I RS , A PPEL L EE
.

Be fore HOL DAWAY, STEI NB ERG, and GREENE, Judges

. O R D E R Th e a pp e lla nt a pp e a ls, thr ou g h c ouns e l, a Janu ary 19 98 , de c isi on of the B oa rd of Ve te ra ns ' Appea ls (Boa

rd) that deter

mined that an April 1977 dec ision by a De partment of V eter ans Aff airs (VA) reg ional office , which had de nied VA se rvice connec tion f or arthritis and a

nervous disorde r, did not contain clea

r and unmistakable err or. On Aug ust 30, 2000, the Court issued an o pinion aff irming the Boa

rd dec ision. Simmons v. Gobe r , 14 Vet.App. 84 ( 2000). Subsequently , Congr ess ena cted se vera l laws reg ardingveter ans b en efits claims. See Holliday v. Gobe r , __ Vet.App. __, No. 99-1788,2000 W L1770048 (De c. 1, 2000) ( per c uriam order ) (discussingrec ent Cong ressional e nactments) [here inafter Hollidaybriefingorder ] (a copy of which is attac hed to this order) . I n view of the chang es in la w descr ibed in the Holliday briefing order , the Court require s supplemental brief ing f rom the par

ties on the following questions: Do any of the new laws discussed in the Holliday br ie fi ngor de r a pp ly to t his c la im; if

so , w hic h p ro vis ion (s ) an d h o w d o es an y

ap p l i cab l e p ro v i s i o n af

fe ct t h i s ca s e? I nad d i t i o n , i ns u ch s u p p l em en t al b ri ef

i n g, eac h party

may , but need not, addr ess the questions enumer ated in the Holliday briefingorder

. Up on c on sid e ratio n o f t

he fo re g oin g , it

is ORDERED that, not later than 30 day s afte r the date of this order, the Secre tary file and se rve on the appe llant a memora ndum in response to this order. It is further ORDERED that, not later tha n 30 day s after

service o f t h e Secr etar

y ' s memorandum, the appellant f

ile a re sponse to this order a nd the Secr etar

y ' s response the reto. DA TE D: De c e mbe r 2 1, 20 00 PER CU RI AM

.
177 La. 995

#### STATE v. MALAZZA.

No. 32396.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 7, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 3, 1933.

L. C. Blanchard, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport (James O’JS’iell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

BRIÍNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for the crime of “assault with intent to commit rape.”

There is no bill of exception and no assignment of errors in the record, and the appellant has not filed a brief in this court.

It appears that all of the proceedings in the case were regular and legal; therefore, the verdict and sentence must be affirmed. In the case of State v. McCrocklin, 130 La. 106, 57 So. 645, the rule is concisely stated as follows: “In the absence of a bill of exceptions,this court will not review the judgment of the lower court, except when there is error patent on the face of the record.”

This was the settled jurisprudence of this state long before our Code of Criminal Procedure was adopted, and article 502 of that Code is merely an amplified reiteration of a well recognized rule.

The judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          84,592
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,327
<INVENTORY>                                     21,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,796
<PP&E>                                       1,608,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 363,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,534,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,861,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,840
<OTHER-SE>                                   (328,171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,534,920
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,271
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,292,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,301,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,301,782)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (546,577)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,848,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.10)


</TABLE>
#### Jessie CLARK v. Robt. H. SMITH et al.

No. 2147.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1940.

Argued before LE BLANC and OTT, JJ., and HERMANN MOYSE, Judge ad hoc.

Taylor, Porter & Brooks, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Durrett & Hardin, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

HERMANN MOYSE, Judge ad hoc.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the case of Cal Prevost v. Robert H. Smith et al., 197 So. 905, it is ordered that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff be amended by reducing the amount of the award from the sum of $3,500 to $3,000 and that, as thus amended, it be affirmed. The judgment in favor of the Board of Administrators of the Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans is likewise affirmed. Appellant is to pay all costs.

' LE BLANC and OTT, JJ., concur in the decree.

DORE, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1385

To designate the United States courthouse facility located at 301 North 
 Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2007

  Mr. Nelson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse facility located at 301 North 
 Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. C. CLYDE ATKINS UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse facility located at 
301 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 
a reference to the ``C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```