alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.02**

I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of iGate Corporation (“iGate”),certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of iGate;

2.     Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the periods covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) forthe registrant and we have:

                    a.       designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

                    b.       evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

                    c.       disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                    a.       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                    b.       any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

August 13, 2003

|                    |                                                             |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | /s/ MICHAEL ZUGAY                                           |
|          |                                                             |
|     | Michael ZugaySenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |

28
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2004
                              By       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                              ------------------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth I. Denos
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1187 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1187

  To require the Architect of the Capitol to develop a plan to reduce 
  carbon dioxide emissions from the Capitol complex, with the goal of 
    achieving carbon neutrality at the complex by December 31, 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2007

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Architect of the Capitol to develop a plan to reduce 
  carbon dioxide emissions from the Capitol complex, with the goal of 
    achieving carbon neutrality at the complex by December 31, 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Capitol Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CLEAN CAPITOL COMPLEX PLAN.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Architect of the Capitol shall develop a plan to 
reduce emissions of carbon dioxide from the Capitol complex, with the 
goal of achieving carbon neutrality at the complex by December 31, 
2020.
    (b) Methods of Reduction.--In developing the plan under subsection 
(a), the Architect of the Capitol shall provide for reductions in 
carbon dioxide emissions from the Capitol complex through--
            (1)(A) measures to make the complex more energy efficient;
            (B) increasing the use of energy conservation measures at 
        the complex; and
            (C) the use of onsite and offsite renewable sources of 
        energy at the complex; or
            (2) if none of the measures described in paragraph (1) are 
        practicable, as determined by the Architect of the Capitol, the 
        purchase of carbon dioxide emission offsets for use by the 
        complex.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,022
<PP&E>                                         321,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                (108,620)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,982
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,514
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,371
<SALES>                                         17,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,441
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,775)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02468-RPM

PAUL GIVENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

NETJETS AVIATION, INC.,

NETJETS SALES, INC.,

BRUCE H. WHITE, and

RICARDO E. HELLEBUYCK, 

Defendants.

 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CHARLES PERRIGOUE

 

Today the defendants filed a motion for protective order regarding the deposition of Charles

Perrigoue, scheduled for March 23, 2012, in Irvine, California. The motion asks for relief requested by

the deponent concerning the use of his deposition transcript and videotape. The deponent has no such

right and if he is unwilling to proceed with the deposition as scheduled, his appearance may be obtained

through a subpoena issued by the relevant United States District Court in California.

Dated: March 21st , 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02468-RPM Document 15 Filed 03/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
# **EXHIBIT32.1**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES**-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

# ** **

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the yearended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe SEC or its staff upon request.

 

 

Date:June 14, 2009

 
|   | /s/ CHRISTOPHER A.  TWOMEY             |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Christopher A. Twomey,                 |
|   | Chairman,  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Luis F. Torres, Appellant, v Sandra Love et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Luis F. Torres, Respondent, v Jose M. Diaz, Jr., et al., Appellants. (And Five Other Actions.)

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), entered on August 17, 1990, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Eggert, J., without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 31
                    RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATIONS

        I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer of
Isramco, Inc., certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Isramco, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2003;

        2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

        4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and I have:

        a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

        c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

        5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the
equivalent function):

        a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004


                                /S/ HAIM TSUFF
                                HAIM TSUFF
                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)



                                       28
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23593]



[[Page 58713]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Brierfield 
Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2008 Revision, published July 1, 2008, at 73 FR 37644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: Brierfield Insurance Company (NAIC <greek-i> 10993).
    Business Address: 6300 University Parkway, Sarasota, FL 34240.
    Phone: (800) 226-3224. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $386,000. SURETY 
LICENSES c/: AL, AR, MS, TN. INCORPORATED IN: Mississippi.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2008 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: September 29, 2008.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E8-23593 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             194
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,764
<PP&E>                                          13,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,625
<BONDS>                                          6,931
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        134
<COMMON>                                         3,755
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,810
<SALES>                                          8,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,401
<CGS>                                           12,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (335)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (123)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (64)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (64)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.29)
        


</TABLE>
Order entered March 24, 2104

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00313
- CV
DR. JANINE CHARBONEA U, D.V.M., Appellant
V. LOURDES H I LL ZRINY, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417
- 04035
- 2013 

### O RDER This is an appeal from the trial court’s February 21, 2014 interlocutory “order regarding service on defendants.” It was filed March 10, 2014, within the twenty

- day time frame allowed for appeals fro m interlocutory orders

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(b), 28.1. Asserting the trial court has not yet “granted [her] the right to appeal,” appellant has filed a “motio n for extension of time to accept amended notice of accelerated interlocutory appeal and/or n otice of interlocutory appeal.” Because the appeal was timely filed, we DENY the motion as moot to the extent it seeks an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(b). To the extent the motion seeks additional time for fil ing an amended notice of appeal, we DENY the motion as premature because the time for filing an amended notice of appeal has not lapsed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1(g).Although the notice of appeal was timely filed, we question whether we have jurisdictio n over the appeal. Subject to a few mostly statutory exceptions, interlocutory orders are unappealable until a final judgment is entered. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Crop. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because it does not appear the trial court’s Februar y 21, 2014 order is appealable, we ORDER appellant to file a letter brief of no more than three pages addressing our concern. The brief shall be filed no later than April 3, 2014. Appellees shall file any respons iv e letter brief of no more than three pag es no later than April 14, 2014. If either party relies on information not before this Court, that party must obtain a clerk’s record from the trial court containing that information. After it has received the jurisdictional briefs, the Court will either (1) order the appeal dismissed for w ant of jurisdi c t i on or (2) notify the parties that the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal and, if appropriate of any pending deadlines. Appellant is cautioned that failure to file the requested brief may result in d ismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
DeutscheBank EZ]

1%めer:曖_8500426-8

OUR REF NOMBER =

SENDERS REF :

WE HAVtt RECE工 VED 

...

S

CIRRENCY : uSD

VALUE DATE : 23-APR‐ 2008

3250 BENrON ST A,T 07

WHEAT R工 DCE, C0

DETAILS OF PAY34EVr :

CmRCES : 000

HANDL工NC FEE

HANDL工NC P22

COMM IN L工EU

COMIIIlm工 CATION EXPBNSE

OR工G工 NATOR : OR工G工NATINC BANК :

UNIVERSAL CONSuLTING RESOuRCES, LLC BAヽ OF AMER工CA, N_A_

NEW YORK

802■ 2-7065 00,33 pn sTREET WEST

000■ , NEW YORK

BBNEF_ RBF = 2008042200206423

AS DETA工 n BELOW 

FOMIS TRANSFER CRED工 T ADV工CE

45RS200004230053

23-APR-2008

AMOONT :

EX. RATE :

NV RりrEE ;

500′ 000.00

.。 q。 00000

.0000000000

ACCOtlVr工 NC DETAILS :

CR ACCOUNT : AMOUNT : OS'

ARCANm EOu工 TY D LLC

3■ 6 HARR工ERS PLACE

BRADE― N, FL 342■ 2

tlSA N―DA

ON工TED STATES OF AMBRICA

500′ 000.00 CR

GOVERNMENT

EXH:BIT

8

Cottfirnations are geaerated signed by the bank

NSOWERS 002328

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-8 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of

1
l

J .ijí OFFICE OF THEN AITORNEY OENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTlN Guam c. UAHU A-anunab 9 tPr 

# ). --- -ai

“OCOYYIIYlr.T.^.. .- _^__ _^..___ -_ _ --.-- .._..-.. ^_,...^_.___.._rr .“_~^~.r^-” -..- .--~Y~“~~..CD.. ^“C.^e-.e*ICI.-

### -P?RST AiSISTANT

ATT%ib!!EY

G- W'
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kareem Stewart, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 465]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court, dated October 25, 1999 *(People v Stewart,*265 AD2d 586), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 15, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Smith and O’Brien, JJ., concur.