alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COY LAMAR DOTSON, III, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1021

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Jalal Harb, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Mark J. O'Brien, Special Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### B. J. CLARIDY v. STATE.

8 Div. 185.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

June 4, 1935.

RICE, Judge,

Affirmed.
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02428-JLK Document 47 Filed 02/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
#### County Industrial Corp., Plaintiff, *v.*William Francia et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

February 9, 1957.

*Seymour Robinowitz*for plaintiff.

*John S. Adams*for defendants.

James W. Bailey, J.

Plaintiff makes this application to strike the affirmative defense and counterclaim upon the ground that it is insufficient in law.

The action seeks to foreclose a mortgage upon real property of the defendant. The mortgage was executed as security for five notes endorsed by the defendants. The defense asserts that plaintiff discounted the notes in violation of section 131 of the Banking Law; that the notes are, therefore, void and that the mortgage executed to secure the endorsement of the void notes may not be enforced.

The discount of notes by a corporation other than a banking corporation is specifically proscribed. (Banking Law, § 131; *Miller*v. *Discount Factors,*1 N Y 2d 275.) However this proscription does not extend to a mortgage executed to secure discounted notes. The notes are merely evidence of the debt to which the mortgage attaches. The execution of the mortgage to secure the debt is not a proscribed banking function. (See General Corporation Law, § 18; *Williams-Dexter Co.*v. *Dowland Realty Corp.,*259 N. Y. 581; *Pratt*v. *Eaton,*79 N. Y. 449.) The defense is therefore insufficient to defeat this action to foreclose the mortgage.

Motion granted. Submit order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND II DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          69,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  393,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,137,664
<PP&E>                                      15,068,050
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,855,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,477,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          513,990
<BONDS>                                      6,257,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,705,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,477,303
<SALES>                                      1,841,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,179,772
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,472,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               786,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             435,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (800,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (800,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (800,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.24)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,307
<SECURITIES>                                     8,299
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                       524
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,995
<PP&E>                                           2,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                     942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,037
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                       927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,525
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





MARCH 11, 2011





/s/ HAIM TSUFF


HAIM TSUFF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART

Defendants.

 

GOVERNMENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO MOTION

 

The United States of America, by and through John F. Walsh, United States

Attorney for the District of Colorado and Assistant Untied States Attorney Linda Kaufman,

respectfully requests this Court enter an order permitting the government an extension of

time to April 3, 2012 to respond to Defendant John Gallegos’ Motion for Severance 

 (Doc. 71) , and as grounds therefor, states as follows:

1. On October 14, 2011, the Court ordered that motions be filed by March 12, 2012,

with responses due by March 26, 2012.

2. On March 12, 2012, Defendant John Gallegos filed his Unopposed Motion for

Additional Two Weeks in Which to File Motions (Doc. 70).

3. Defendant John Gallegos’ Motion for Severance was filed on March 26, 2012

after close of business.

4. The government therefore requests a short extension of time, until April 3, 2012,

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 72 filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
to file its response.

5. A motions hearing in this case is scheduled for April 5, 2012, at 4:00 p.m. 

6. Counsel for Mr. Gallegos has stated that he has no objection to this motion.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

By: s/ Linda Kaufman 

Linda Kaufman

Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Government

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 72 filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 27 day of March 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing with th

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the following e-mail addresses:

Martin Adam Stuart 

Martin Stuart, P.C. 

Email: martinstuartlaw@solucian.com

William Lewis Taylor 

William L. Taylor, P.C. 

Email: wltaylorpc@gmail.com

Ms. Paula M. Ray

E-mail: paulamray@earthlink.net

 By: s/ Deborah Sisung

DEBORAH SISUNG

Legal Assistant to AUSA Linda Kaufman

United States Attorney’s Office

1225 - 17 Street, Suite 700 th

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0244

Fax: (303) 454-0402

E-mail: deborah.sisung@usdoj.gov

 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 72 filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58201 

[FR Doc. E8–23353 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–79] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–79 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
58202 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.062</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58203 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.063</GPH>
58204 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.064</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58205 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.065</GPH>
58206 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.066</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58207 

[FR Doc. E8–23354 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–82] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–82 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1121

To authorize the cancellation of Perkins Loans for students who perform 
     public service as librarians in low-income schools and public 
                               libraries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2007

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the cancellation of Perkins Loans for students who perform 
     public service as librarians in low-income schools and public 
                               libraries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Librarian Incentive to Boost 
Recruitment and Retention in Areas of Need Act of 2007'' or the 
``LIBRARIAN Act''.

SEC. 2. LOAN CANCELLATION.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 465(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1087ee(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``section 111(c)'' in subparagraph 
                (A) and inserting ``section 1113(a)(5)'';
                    (B) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (H);
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (I) and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (D) by inserting after subparagraph (I) the 
                following new subparagraph:
            ``(J) as a full time librarian, if the librarian has a 
        master's degree in library science and is employed in--
                    ``(i) an elementary school or secondary school that 
                is eligible for assistance under title I of the 
                Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965; or
                    ``(ii) a public library that serves a geographic 
                area that contains 1 or more schools eligible for 
                assistance under title I of the Elementary and 
                Secondary Education Act of 1965.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)(A)(i), by striking out ``(H), or (I)'' 
        and inserting ``(H), (I), or (J)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any year of service that is completed after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,025

EX PARTE SHONDRAILL ANTOINE MELLIX, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 970339 IN THE 208th DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Mellix v. State, No. 14-06-01097-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14 Dist.], delivered August

th

7, 2007, no pet.). 

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. 
2

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-06-01097-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 970339 from the 208th Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition

for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which

this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: October 29, 2008

Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel

Criminal Case No. 1:11-cr-00361-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Disclose

Grand Jury Material To Defendant, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(i)&(F).

HAVING REVIEWED the motion and being otherwise advised in the bases, the

Court finds that good and sufficient cause supports the same, and it is therefore 

ORDERED that the government's motion is granted, and grand jury testimony

and grand jury documents may be disclosed to the defendant and his attorney in the

course of discovery in this case. It is further 

ORDERED that such materials shall only be used in defending this case; that

such materials are disclosed only to the defendant and his attorney; that the defense

attorney shall maintain custody of such materials, and shall not reproduce or

disseminate the same.

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 67 Filed 12/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this day of December, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

-2-

10th

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 67 Filed 12/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         278,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,256,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,994,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,926,807
<PP&E>                                       2,226,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 172,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,913,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,519,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,756
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,379,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,913,574
<SALES>                                      9,935,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,935,886
<CGS>                                        4,992,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,405,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                500,628
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   500,628
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FILED UNDER SEAL

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495;

Defendants.

AMENDED ORDER TO SEAL

The Court has for consideration the government's Motion to Seal wherein the government asks this

Court to seal its Verified Complaint For Forfeiture In Rem in this case, as well as the government's Motion

to Seal, and any order issued with regard to this motion. Upon consideration, 

IT IS ORDERED that the government's Motion to Seal is Granted. The above-referenced case and

all related documents are SEALED, except as to Plaintiff, its agents and court personnel, until the defendants

have been located and arrested, or until further order of this Court. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/Craig B. Shaffer 

Craig B. Shaffer

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 15 Filed 09/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1