alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Interim
Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 24, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul G. Casner, Jr. the
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/S/    PAUL G. CASNER,
JR.                     
|Paul G. Casner, Jr.                            
|Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|                                               
|Date: December 8, 2010
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-cv-1945-RBJ-KLM

THOMAS SMITH

Plaintiff,

v.

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

STERLING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 

ARASTIDE [sic] W. ZAVARAS,

KEVIN MILYARD, Warden at Sterling Correctional Facility, 

JANICE JONES, Colorado Department of Corrections Sargent [sic], and 

JESSE LOVELACE, Colorado Department of Corrections Officer, 

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING RECOMMENDATIONS

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the May 14, 2012 Order and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix [docket #35]. As relevant here, the Recommendation addresses 

defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#10]. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within 

fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. Despite this 

advisement, no objection to Magistrate Judge Mix’s Recommendation was filed by either party.

“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate . . . [judge’s] 

report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th 

Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that “[i]t does not appear that 

Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, 

Case 1:11-cv-01945-RBJ-KLM Document 42 Filed 09/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”). 

The Court has reviewed the relevant pleadings concerning the Recommendation. Based 

on this review, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s analyses and recommendations 

are correct, and that “there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory 

committee’s note. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation of The United States 

Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge [#35] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [#10] is 

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants the 

Colorado Department of Corrections, the Sterling, Colorado Correctional Facility, Kevin 

Milyard and Aristedes Zavaras are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s claim for a declaratory judgment is DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

DATED this 4

th day of September, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01945-RBJ-KLM Document 42 Filed 09/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02478-REB

LACY E. ESTES,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

The matter is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion For Award of Attorney’s

Fees Pursuant To The Equal Access To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [#21] filed

June 20, 2013. The motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A.

Dated: June 24, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02478-REB Document 22 Filed 06/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 207 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 207

       To prohibit retroactive Federal income tax rate increases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To prohibit retroactive Federal income tax rate increases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Retroactive Taxation Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE INCOME TAX RATE INCREASES PROHIBITED.

    (a) General Rule.--No provision of law which imposes a Federal 
income tax rate increase shall apply to any period beginning before the 
date of the enactment of such law.
    (b) Federal Income Tax Rate Increase.--For purposes of subsection 
(a), the term ``Federal income tax rate increase'' means any amendment 
to subsection (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e) of section 1, or to section 
11(b) or 55(b), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that imposes a 
new percentage as a rate of tax and thereby increases the amount of tax 
imposed by any such section.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending November 21, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodALLIANCE BANCORP                                                                                                        CICAlliance Bancorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) Provisions, Francesville, Indiana, together with Shane R. Pilarski, Francesville, Indiana, Ronald K. Kruger, Francesville, Indiana, and Alyssa M. Chapman, Winamac, Indiana, as administrators, and as a group acting in concert, to retain control of 10 percent or more of the voting shares of Alliance Bancorp, Francesville, Indiana, and thereby indirectly control Alliance Bank, Francesville, Indiana.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/08/2020CBI BANK & TRUST                                                                                                        * 18C
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,071] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 17, 2008 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Chase Home Finance, LLC, a division of JP Morgan Chase & Co., Lexington, Kentucky. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 2008. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8-23293 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted), the undersigned, Charles J. Drake, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(the “Periodic
Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED:
              December 20, 2010/S/ Charles J. DrakeCharles
      J. DrakeChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ZAPWORLD.COM AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
         FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
         ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,341,200
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      807,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (35,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,286,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,843,200
<PP&E>                                             532,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (267,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,568,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              873,000
<BONDS>                                              3,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         8,372,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,737,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,568,900
<SALES>                                          4,444,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,485,600
<CGS>                                            2,978,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,812,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (35,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (390,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (390,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (390,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.11)



</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00402-CV

____________________

IN RE GERALD HOOKS JR. AND LESLY K. HOLEN

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding 

172th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-167,872

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

On my own motion, I recuse myself from further participation in this original 

proceeding, effective October 28, 2016. 

ORDER ENTERED October 28, 2016.

 ________________________________

 STEVE MCKEITHEN

 Chief Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7753

HASSAN HARVEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:16-cv-01442-CMH-MSN)

Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hassan Harvey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hassan Harvey seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Harvey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00368-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On November 15, 2011, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference. 

After conferring with the parties and with their consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on December 13, 2011, commencing at 9:00 a.m., the court shall

conduct a change of plea hearing in this matters.

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing;

and

3. That Counsel for the parties shall deliver or e-mail a courtesy copy of all

change of plea documents separately to Judge Blackburn’s chambers AND to the

Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change of plea hearing

date. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. If the documents are not timely submitted, the

hearing will be vacated. There will be no exceptions to this policy. On the date of the

hearing, counsel shall then bring with them an original and one (1) copy of the plea

agreement and the statement in advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

Dated: November 15, 2011
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00368-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ARTURO MIRANDA-CINTO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On December 13, 2011, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference to

reset the change of plea hearing in this matter. After conferring with counsel and with

their consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on December 20, 2011, commencing at 10:00 a.m., the court shall

conduct a change of plea hearing in this matter; and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing. 

Dated: December 13, 2011

Case 1:11-cr-00368-REB Document 20 Filed 12/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Scherne, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Robert Scherne
                                              -----------------------
                                              Robert Scherne
                                              Chief Financial Officer

                                              November 20, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,022
<SECURITIES>                                    46,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                       464
<INVENTORY>                                      4,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,980
<PP&E>                                          69,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,697
<BONDS>                                         40,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,923
<SALES>                                        116,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,053
<CGS>                                           65,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,446
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,149
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,149
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Healthcare Technology, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Charles Smith
-----------------------
Charles Smith, CEO, CFO
Dated: February 17, 2005