alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed March 16, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00044

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF G.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 13128



### O R D E R
The clerk’s record was filed April 17, 2020. Our review has determined that
a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk ’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c).
The record does not contain appellants ’ counterpetition in which they requested termination of appellee ’ s parental rights.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before March 30, 2021, containing appellants ’ counterpetition in which

t hey requested termination of appellee ’ s parental rights.If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Poissant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Judge Raymond P. Moore 

Civil case no. 11-cv-02530-RM-KLM

ALFONSO PACHECO, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

RAE TIMME, in her individual capacity, 

LOU ARCHULETA, Warden, Fremont Correctional Facility, in his official capacity, 

TOM CLEMENT, in his individual capacity, 

ROGER WERHOLTZ, Interim Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, 

in his official capacity, and 

ANTHONY A. DECESARO, Step 3 Grievance Officer, in his individual and official capacities, 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

______________________________________________________________________________

 This matter is before the Court on the November 26, 2013 Recommendation of United 

States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (the “Recommendation”) (ECF No. 49) that Defendant’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46) be granted. In doing so, the Recommendation, if 

adopted, resolves all remaining claims at issue in this prisoner litigation. The Recommendation is 

incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). 

 The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within 

fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 49 at 10-11.) 

Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation have to date 

been filed by either party. 

 The Court concludes that Judge Mix’s analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is 

no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note 

Case 1:11-cv-02530-RM-KLM Document 50 Filed 05/30/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

(“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on 

the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 

F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may 

review a magistrate’s report under any standard it deems appropriate.”). 

 In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

(1) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 49) is ADOPTED in its entirety; 

(2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED; and 

(3) The Clerk is direction to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all claims. 

 DATED this 30th day of May, 2014. 

 BY THE COURT: 

____________________________________ 

RAYMOND P. MOORE 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02530-RM-KLM Document 50 Filed 05/30/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02419-MSK-MEH

ANDREZ DOMINGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIBERTY ACQUISITIONS SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
Exhibit32

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of United States Code

We, John Bush and IreneJ. Marino, do hereby certify that:

1.    This annual report ofPerfectData Corporation containing the financial statements for theyears ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m) and

2.    The information contained in thisannual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of PerfectData Corporation.

Date: May 24, 2005

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | /s/  | JohnBush                     John Bush Presidentand Chief Executive Officer |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | /s/  | Irene J.Marino                    Irene J. MarinoVice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and ChiefAccounting Officer |

|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toPerfectData Corporation and will be retained by PerfectData Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. |

E-19

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROBERT GRAZIANO, DOC #Y28272, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4587 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 9, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40075

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NOE REYES, JR., also known as Noe Reyes,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-944-2

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Noe Reyes, Jr., appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for

possession with intent to distribute 178 kilograms of marijuana. He argues that

the district court clearly erred in applying the two-level enhancement for

possession of a firearm under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). 

“The district court’s determination that § 2D1.1(b)(1) applies is a factual

finding reviewed for clear error.” See United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 396

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 24, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-40075 Document: 00512030689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2012
No. 12-40075

(5th Cir. 2010). A factual finding is not clearly erroneous if it is plausible in

light of the record as a whole. Id.

Our review of the record does not show that a connection between the

handguns and Reyes’s drug-related offense was “clearly improbable.” See

§ 2D1.1, comment. (n.3). To the contrary, this review shows “that a temporal

and spatial relation existed between the weapon, the drug trafficking activity,

and the defendant.” See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764-

65 (5th Cir. 2008). Both the loaded handguns and the drugs were discovered in

Reyes’s home. The loaded handguns were discovered under the mattress in the

bedroom where Reyes slept, and the drugs were discovered in a back bedroom. 

Moreover, Reyes pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute the

marijuana seized from in the back bedroom, and Reyes’s brother told agents that

Reyes coordinated the transportation of the marijuana found at his home. The

district court did not clearly err by imposing the two-level enhancement. See

Ruiz, 621 F.3d at 396.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 12-40075 Document: 00512030689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-01737-LTB-MJW

C. RANDEL LEWIS, solely in his capacity as Receiver,

Plaintiff,

v.

KATHRYN HOLDERMAN and

EUGENE HOLDERMAN,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

Complaint (Doc 2) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), and the Court, having reviewed the

file in this matter, together with Plaintiff’s Response, which confesses the Motion to

Dismiss, and Defendants’ Reply, hereby Grants the Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter IS DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: July 15, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-01737-LTB Document 8 Filed 07/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00653-CV

IN RE Allen J. JONES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 4, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On October 19, 2015, relator Allen J. Jones filed a petition for writ of mandamus

complaining of the trial court’s order denying his motion to disqualify opposing counsel in the 

underlying civil suit. A separate motion for emergency relief was filed on October 22, 2015. The 

court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is 

not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CI-16674, styled Cearth Faire v. FMP SA Management Group, LLC 

d/b/a Food Management Partners, LLC; ALL Jones, LLC; Allen J. Jones, Individually; and Peter Donbavand, 

Individually, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Richard Price 

presiding.
1

 “[#20]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02426-REB-MEH

CHEVRON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

MARIA AGUINDA SALAZAR,

Defendant.

DOUGLAS BELTMAN,

Movant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J. 

This matter is before the court on the Status Report of Douglas Beltman,

Appearing Pro Se, per Court Order of 4/23/14 [#20]1

 filed April 30, 2014. Based on

the information provided by the movant, Douglas Beltman, I enter this order of

dismissal. 

This case was initiated when Mr. Beltman filed his Non-Party Beltman’s Motion

for Protective Order [#1] on September 14, 2011. Mr. Beltman sought an order

quashing a deposition subpoena which had been served on him in the underlying

lawsuit. On September 30, 2011, the court entered an order [#16] denying without

prejudice the motion for protective order because the underlying lawsuit had been

Case 1:11-cv-02426-REB-MEH Document 22 Filed 05/01/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

stayed. This case then was inactive for more than two years. 

In the status report [#20], Mr. Beltman states that the claims against him in the

underlying lawsuit have been dismissed with prejudice. Further, he states that the

“deposition subpoena in the underlying New York case is now moot, and I will not again

be seeking a protective order to quash it.” Status report [#20], ¶ 4. Mr. Beltman

represents that he is not opposed to the dismissal of this case. Id.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), this case is DISMISSED with prejudice;

2. That the parties shall bear their own fees and costs.

Dated May 1, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02426-REB-MEH Document 22 Filed 05/01/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         260,770
<SECURITIES>                                   449,066
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                       778
<INVENTORY>                                     13,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               791,181
<PP&E>                                         190,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 941,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,085
<BONDS>                                        450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       788,468
<OTHER-SE>                                   (433,138)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   941,241
<SALES>                                        519,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,718
<CGS>                                          159,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  502,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   616
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,324
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02479-MSK-MJW

MELVIN J. SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

v.

EG&G/LEAR SIEGLER SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND TO CLOSE CASE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice

(#17) filed February 24, 2012. The Court having reviewed the foregoing: 

ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED and any and all claims asserted in the abovecaptioned matter are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs and

attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with this action. The Clerk shall close this case.

DATED this 24th day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02479-MSK-MJW Document 19 Filed 02/24/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending December 23, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodALL WEST BANCORP                                                                                                        CICChange in Control Notice filed by Matthew Moskowitz, Plainview, New York, Yaakov Markowitz, Brooklyn, New York; Jarret Prussin, Westport, Connecticut, Paul Brown, Monte Carlo, Monaco, and Menachem Wilenkin, Brooklyn, New York, to acquire voting shares of All West Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire shares of FinWise Bank, both of Sandy, Utah. Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/27/2017CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, THE                                                                                         * SLHC AcquisitionThe Charles Schwab Corporation, San Francisco, California, to acquire a de novo depository institution, Charles Schwab Trust Bank, Henderson, Nevada, a state-chartered savings bank.Newspaper: 12/21/2017Federal Register: 01/08/2018FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF LONG BEACH                                                                                * BranchFarmers and Merchants Bank of Long Beach, Long Beach, California, proposes to open a new branch at 33 East Carrillo Street, Santa Barbara, California.Newspaper: 12/16/2017Federal Register: Not applicableOAK VALLEY COMMUNITY BANK                                                                                               * BranchOak Valley Community Bank, Oakdale, California, to open a new branch at 241 W. Main Street, Turlock, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
---

|Coded Tables | 
|------------ | 



|These data are released whenever there are code changes.                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Complete file (442 KB PDF)Cover page and table of contents (114 KB PDF)
Debt growth, borrowing and debt outstanding tables (13 KB PDF)
Flows tables (138 KB PDF)
Level tables (124 KB PDF)
Balance sheet tables (20 KB PDF)
Supplementary tables (33 KB PDF)

|These files are available in Acrobat (PDF 3) format only.Obtaining the free Acrobat Reader from the Adobe Web Site
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Release dates |
Coded tables | Historical dataCurrent release | 
Screen reader | 
PDF (450 KB)

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.3


                                       Investment & Corporate Banking
                                       111 West Monroe St.
                                       20th Floor East
                                       Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 60603
                                       (312) 461-7219

March 24, 2000



Mr. Michael Pfeiffer
Executive Vice President, General Counsel
Realty Income Corporation
220 West Crest Street
Escondido, CA  92025-1707

RE:   $25 Million Revolving Credit Agreement between Bank of Montreal
      and Realty Income Corporation dated February 1, 2000 (the
      "Credit Agreement")

Dear Michael:

As we discussed by telephone today, this letter will confirm the Bank
of Montreal consents to the following change in the captioned Credit
Agreement:

The final sentence of Section 2.02, paragraph (a) "Procedure for Pro
Rata Loans" shall be amended to allow EuroDollar Prorata Loans in the
minimum aggregate amount of $1,000,000.  This amount is reduced from
the $5,000,000 currently in the document.  The remainder of the Credit
Agreement shall be unchanged.

Michael, I'm glad we could help and I trust this change will be
satisfactory.

Yours truly,



Greg K. Steele
Vice President
Real Estate Capital Markets

GKS/gks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02306-WJM-KLM

LARRY D. FREDERICK,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SHORT BRIEFS

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Leave to file Short

Briefs in Light of Tenth Circuit Opinion, filed August 1, 2012 (ECF No. 47). The Court

having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED. Each party may file briefs addressing the

pending motion to remand in light of the Tenth Circuit’s June 28, 2012 ruling as follows:

1. Opening brief, on or before August 17, 2012

2. Response brief, on or before August 31, 2012.

No brief shall exceed six pages, exclusive of attorney signature blocks and

certificate of service.

Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 48 Filed 08/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Dated this 6th day of August, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 48 Filed 08/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
No. 72-6325.

#### Theriault *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.