alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Calypso Wireless, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-KSB/A for the period December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Cristian turrini,
        CEO and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        George Schilling
 
 George
        Schilling
 President
 Dated:
        December 31,
        2007
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Calypso Wireless, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 4
I.T. TECHNOLOGY, INC.
COMMON STOCK
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
CUSIP 45069H 10 5
SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
This Certifies that
is the owner of
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE PAR VALUE OF $0.01 EACH OF THE
COMMON STOCK OF I.T. TECHNOLOGY, INC.
transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate
and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all
of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and of any amendments
thereto (copies of which are on file at the office of the Transfer Agent) to all
of which the holder by acceptance hereof, assents. This certificate is not
valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the
Registrar.

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

Dated
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
SECRETARY
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
(NEW YORK, NY)           TRANSFER AGENT
AND REGISTRAR

BY

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE



<PAGE>   2
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations.

TEN COM-
TEN ENT-
JT TEN-
as tenants in common
as tenants by the entireties
as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants
in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-...............Custodian................
                                          (Cust)                 (Minor)
                             under Uniform Gifts to Minors
                         Act.............
                                             (State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
For value received,           hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE IDENTIFY SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
shares
of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do
hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
NOTICE:
THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
Signature(s) Guaranteed:
THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION
(BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO
S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR
DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO
THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.



                                      -1-
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Baylor, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 422]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J), rendered November 12, 2003, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At trial, the People offered into evidence reports containing the results of DNA testing performed on samples collected from the complainants and the defendant. The DNA reports were offered through the testimony of an expert in forensic biology employed by the Medical Examiner’s Office of the City of New York. The expert supervised other public employees who conducted the tests performed upon the samples, but he did not engage in all of the actual testing procedures.

The defendant’s contention, inter alia, that the admission of the DNA evidence violated his Federal and State constitutional right to confront witnesses against him (see *Crawford v Washington,*541 US 36 [2004]), is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Bones,*17 AD3d 689 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 826 [2005]; *People v Mack,*14 AD3d 517 [2005]). In any event, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the DNA reports were properly admitted under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see CPLR 4518 [a]; *People v Bones, supra; People v Antongiorgi,*242 AD2d 578 [1997]). H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal Case No.: 11-CR-00360-WJM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. FARLEN KENRIC KETCHUM,

Defendant.

 

ORDER FOR RELEASE FROM CUSTODY

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

The Defendant was arrested on a Warrant due to Violation of Probation. After an appearance

before the Magistrate Judge on August 30, 2012, it was determined that there was no probable cause

to believe the Defendant had committed the alleged Violation of Probation, therefore:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant be immediately released from custody of

the U. S. Marshal’s Service.

DATED: August 30, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00360-WJM Document 56 Filed 08/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul W. Pence, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Paul W. Pence, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Paul W. Pence, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
November 14, 2002




                                       16
#### In the Matter of Robert A. Moore, Respondent, v William A. Mahoney et al., as Commissioners of the Schenectady County Board of Elections, Respondents, and Richard A. Moran et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered August 13, 1990 in Schenectady County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, to declare invalid the designating petition naming respondents Richard A. Moran and James A. Palmer as the Conservative Party candidates for certain offices of the Village of Scotia in the September 11,1990 primary election.

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Robert E. Lynch. Kane, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

January 10, 2011

No. 09

- 2983

WAYNE A. SMITH , Appellant

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

( D.N.J . No. 2

- 08

- cv

- 02875 )

Present: BARRY, CHAGARES and VANASKIE

, Circuit Judges

Motion by Appellee to request publication of the opinion.

Respectfully,

Clerk/ ARL/awi

Opinion & Judgment filed 11/22/2010

.

Mandate is to Issue on 01/13/2011

.

____________________ __ ___________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing is GRANTED.

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated : January 28, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MAURICE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 326 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02437-RPM

ANDREA L. CHISHOLM, an individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROCK GARDENS RAFTING, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

GLENWOOD CANYON ZIP LINE ADVENTURES, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

ROCK GARDENS MOBILE HOME PARK & CAMPGROUND, LLC d/b/a GLENWOOD

 CANYON RESORT, INC., a Colorado Corporation,

JOSEPH WAYNE MCKEEL, an Individual,

JEFFREY HALE, an Individual, and

BRIAN VANDERMARK, an Individual.

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS ROCK GARDENS RAFTING, INC.;

GLENWOOD CANYON ZIP LINE ADVENTURES INC.; ROCK GARDENS MOBILE

HOME PARK & CAMPGROUND, LLC d/b/a GLENWOOD CANYON RESORT; AND

JEFFREY HALE

_____________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the stipulation for dismissal with prejudice filed September 19, 2012,

[49], it is

ORDERED that the complaint against Defendants Rock Gardens Rafting, Inc.;

Glenwood Canyon Zip Line Adventures, Inc.; Rock Gardens Mobile Home Park &

Campground, LLC d/b/a Glenwood Canyon Resort, Inc.; and Jeffrey Hale is dismissed

with prejudice.

DATED: September 20th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02437-RPM Document 50 Filed 09/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02431-RPM-BNB 

THOMAS HERMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

REDLINE RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, and 

EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 

Defendants. 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

 THE COURT having reviewed the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant 

to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and being fully advised in the premises, DOES HEREBY 

ORDER that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, with each party to pay his or its own 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 BY THE COURT: 

January 3, 2012 s/Richard P. Matsch 

__________________ ____________________________________ 

DATE Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02431-RPM-BNB Document 24 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00370-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. DANIEL PETURA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 24, 2011 [Docket No. 15]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 10, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 10, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 25, 2011.

Case 1:11-cr-00370-PAB Document 16 Filed 10/25/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003, Steven M. Schneider, Director and Chief Executive Officer of
ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the nine months ended September 30, 2003,fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
     Securities Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months
     ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.



/s/  Steve  Schneider
---------------------
Steve Schneider
Director and Chief Executive Officer


November 12, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, et. al. 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

CLAIMANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO 

FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

______________________________________________________________________________ 

 George Magnani (“Magnani” or “Claimant”), by and through his counsel Ogborn Mihm, 

LLP, submits the following Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in which to File Response 

to Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 78): 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(A) Certification: Counsel for Claimant conferred with Special 

Attorney for the United States, who does not oppose the relief sought herein. 

1. The United States filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on October 24, 2013. 

Claimant’s response to that Motion is due November 14, 2013. 

2. Counsel for Claimant has diligently been preparing a Response to the Motion for 

Summary Judgment; however, a family illness has kept undersigned counsel out of the office for 

multiple days during the last week. 

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 79 filed 11/14/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
3. As such, counsel for Claimant seeks a very brief extension of time (2 business 

days) in which to complete and file the Response to Motion for Summary Judgment, up to and 

including Monday, November 18, 2013. 

4. Claimant has not sought any prior Motions for Extension of Time. 

5. No party will be prejudiced by the granting of this Motion for Extension of Time, 

nor will it significantly delay the proceedings. 

6. Pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 6.1(D), a copy of this Motion has been served upon 

the moving attorney’s client and all counsel of record. 

WHEREFORE, Claimant George Magnani respectfully requests this Court grant the 

Motion and permit a brief extension of time, up to and including Monday, November 18, 2013, 

in which to file a Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. 

 Respectfully submitted this 14th day of November, 2013. 

 OGBORN MIHM, LLP 

 /s/ Nicole M. Quintana 

 ______________________________________ 

 Murray Ogborn, Atty. Reg. No. 14508 

 Nicole M. Quintana, Atty. Reg. No. 42675 

 1700 Broadway, Suite 1900 

 Denver, Colorado 80290 

 Phone: (303) 592-5900 

 Facsimile: (303) 592-5910 

 Attorneys for Claimant George Magnani 

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 79 filed 11/14/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned hereby certifies that a correct copy of the foregoing was served on the 

following via CM/ECF and/or regular, U.S. mail, postage prepaid on this 14th day of November, 

2013. 

Tonya Andrews 

Special Attorneys for the U.S. Attorney’s Office 

1225 17th Street, Suite 700 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

tonya.andrews@usdoj.gov 

/s/ Audra Albright 

 ________________________________ 

 Audra Albright 

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 79 filed 11/14/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sandra Smith, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), both rendered July 19,1988.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Kazepis,*101 AD2d 816; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Fiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Daniel Lehrfeld, certifythat:

 

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PhotonicProducts Group, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedSubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 14, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Daniel  Lehrfeld     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Daniel  Lehrfeld         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Dismiss and Opinion Filed May 15, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00363-CV
COREY EASLEY, Appellant V. TAMICA BATTIE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-15632



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald Opinion by Justice FitzGerald

By motion filed April 29, 2014 appellant inform s us he no longer desires to prosecute the
appeal and moves to dismiss it. We gr ant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

140363F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

COREY EASLEY, Appellant

No. 05-14-00363-CV V.

TAMICA BATTIE, Appellee On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-15632. Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald. Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that appellee Tamica Battie recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Corey Easley.

Judgment entered May 15, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE