alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.9.1.7

                     JOINDER TO SENIOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
     Between Empyrean Group Holdings, Inc. and certain individual Executives

                                     ANNEX A

                               William K. Stephens

                                Employment Terms

1.   250,000 shares of Common Stock

2.   0 shares of Preferred Stock

3.   a check by November 12, 1999

4.   $25,000

5.   State of Maryland

6.   125,000 shares of Common Stock.

7.   Vice President - Sales & Marketing

8.   Chief Executive Officer

9.   None

10.  $180,000

11.  120%

12.  Performance Cause is inapplicable to the Executive



The following modifications are mutually agreed to by Executive and Company:

"Date Hereof" - with respect to Time Vesting or other anniversaries of
-------------
     employment the phrase "Date Hereof", whether capitalized or not, shall mean
     November 4, 1999.

7(b)(i) - Delete the phrase "(other than in 1999 for which Executive's annual
-------   ------
     bonus shall be determined in accordance with the offer letter provided to
     such Executive by the Company)".

7(b)(ii) - At the end of the section Add the sentence "Executive will remain on
--------                             ---
     the payroll of and receive benefits through the IconixGroup subsidiary
     until such time that he can be transitioned to a different management
     entity without adverse economic impact on his current investments in the
     IconixGroup 401-K and Profit Sharing Plan benefits."

                                       1
#### In re SHEAF’S ESTATE. Hal H. McCAGHREN, Appellant, v. Lawrence Carl KLOSE, Administrator of the Estate of Louisa Sheaf, Deceased, and Ralph M. Sheaf, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Oct. 26, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 11, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5



         May 3, 2000

         Mr. George S. Smith, Jr.
         Senior Vice President
         Chief Financial Officer
         Viacom Inc.
         1515 Broadway
         New York, NY  10003

         Dear George:

         This will confirm our understanding that, upon the completion of the
         merger between Viacom and CBS, you will resign your position as Senior
         Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and all related positions.
         From that point through December 15, 2000, you shall continue as an
         employee in the position of Financial Consultant at a salary of $2,000
         per month.  Effective December 15, 2000, you shall resign your position
         as Financial Consultant and you (or your estate) shall receive the
         severance package for Senior Vice Presidents terminated as a result of
         the merger, a copy of the plan is attached.  For each day during your
         exclusive employment as a Financial Consultant that you are asked to
         travel to our offices, you shall receive a per diem payment of $1,500,
         plus reimbursement of expenses.

         Very truly yours,

         /s/ William A. Roskin

         William A. Roskin
                                               AGREED AND ACCEPTED



                                               /s/ George S. Smith, Jr.
                                               --------------------------
                                               George S. Smith, Jr.

                                               Dated:         5/4/00
                                                      -------------------



         (attachment)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02489-CMA-CBS

PGH INVESTMENT, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership, in its own capacity and

 as Assignee of Wilton Development of steamboat, LLC, a Virginia limited liability

 company,

Plaintiff,

v.

COLORADO REALTY GROUP, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and

RANDALL HANNAWAY, an individual,

Defendants.

ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FOR TWO WEEKS

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Court

Proceedings for Two Weeks (Doc. # 113). The Court, having reviewed the Motion and

the record in this case, hereby ORDERS as follows:

The parties’ Motion to Stay Court Proceedings for Two Weeks (Doc. # 113)

is GRANTED, and this case shall be stayed to and including January 10, 2013. 

DATED: December 28 , 2012

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02489-CMA-CBS Document 114 Filed 12/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02255-RPM 

ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

BLAKE DAVIS, Warden, ADX-Florence 

 Respondent. 

 

ORDER 

UPON Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Traverse, filed October 10, 

2011, it is 

ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion is granted.. Petitioner must file his Traverse on or 

before November 15, 2011. 

 DATED this 11th day of October 2011. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 s/Richard P. Matsch 

 _________________________________ 

 Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch 

 

Case 1:11-cv-02255-RPM Document 8 Filed 10/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

U.S. Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice

Criminal Case No.: 11-po-00040-GJR

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENNETH B. FRIGO,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER SETTING TRIAL TO COURT AND MOTION HEARING

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE GUDRUN J. RICE

DATED: January 03, 2012

It is hereby ORDERED that this matter is set for a half-day trial to the Court

beginning on March 19, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice at

U.S. Courthouse, Wayne Aspinall Federal Building, 400 Rood Avenue, Room 323,

Grand Junction, Colorado, 81501. The provisions of the Local Rules of this Court and

Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall be followed by the prosecution and the defense.

IT IS ORDERED, that all motions in this case be filed on or before February 20,

2012.

IT IS ORDERED, that all responses to motions in this case be filed on or before

February 29, 2012.

Case 1:11-po-00040-GJR Document 18 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 20, 2008. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                 

*1. Mark Allen Conner*, Canton, Georgia, to acquire additional voting shares of FirstCity Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of FirstCity Bank, both of Stockbridge, Georgia.                 

*2. James C. Jones*, Waycross, Georgia; Patrick C. Jones and Carole C. Jones, both of Blackshear, Georgia; to retain voting shares of Jones Bancshares, LP, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Primesouth Bank, both of Blackshear, Georgia.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 30, 2008. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E8-23383 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
ADOLFO LEONEL PENA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2786

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 20, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Denise Ferrero, Judge.

Adolfo Leonel Pena, pro se, Appellant; Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and 

Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lazaro Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J., at hearing, trial and sentence), rendered October 21, 1987, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02) and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 Vi to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

At 3:00 a.m. while stopped at a traffic light on 44th Street and Ninth Avenue, two police officers in plain clothes observed the defendant lift the waistline of his jacket, reveal a gun and tuck the gun back into his pants. The officers, reversing the direction of their car, slowly followed the defendant. Upon making eye contact with the police officers, the defendant bolted up the street. He was chased, apprehended and the gun was seized.

Following a hearing, the defendant’s motion to suppress the gun was denied. It is the defendant’s contention that no probable cause existed to search him and that the suppression *825court erred in crediting the police officers’ testimony because it is improbable that a person possessing a gun would expose it in that area of Manhattan. Further, the defendant argues that the officers’ testimony was both conflicting and tailored to meet constitutional requirements. However, we find no basis to upset the court’s determination as to credibility, and further conclude that probable cause existed for the search and arrest.

The Court of Appeals has stated that "much weight must be accorded the determination of the suppression court with its peculiar advantages of having seen and heard the witnesses”. *(People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977].) Moreover, there is no evidence of fabrication. *(See, People v Quinones,*61 AD2d 765 [1st Dept 1978] [testimony found incredible where officer testified that he responded to a radio call and there was no record of such communication].) Moreover, the record reveals no material inconsistencies between the officers’ testimony. Because the officers saw the gun, there was probable cause for the search and arrest. *(See, People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210 [1976].) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                EXHIBIT 21.1


                           THE LEARNING COMPANY, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


Broderbund Software, Inc. (Delaware)
Learning Company Properties Inc. (Delaware)
Mindscape, Inc. (Delaware)
Parsons Technology, Inc. (California)
SoftKey Holding GmbH (Germany)
SoftKey Software Products Inc. (Ontario)
SoftKey Holdings Corporation (Ontario)
The Learning Company Funding, Inc. (Delaware)
The Learning Company Holland B.V. (The Netherlands)
The Learning Company (Ireland) Limited (Ireland)
The Learning Company (UK) Limited (UK)
TLC Edusoft SA (France)
TLC Multimedia Inc. (Minnesota)
TLC The Learning Company Deutschland GmbH (Germany)
EXHIBIT  23.      CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Forms  S-8 (Nos. 333-83535, 333-83537, 333-83543, and 333-83545)
and  on  Form  S-3  (No.  333-57532)  of Clayton Homes, Inc. of our report dated
August  7,  2002,  relating  to  the  financial statements, which appears in the
Annual  Report  to  Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K.



/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Knoxville,  TN
September  25,  2002
#### In re Adoption of Benjamin Decassen ROTHSCHILD.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1347

AARON LEE HAIRSTON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SALLY JACKSON, Family Court Judge; THE FAMILY COURT OF BERKELEY COUNTY, MARTINSBURG; WEST VIRGINIA BUREAU FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; JENNIFER C. SHOMO; EDYTHE NASH GAISER, State Supreme Court Clerk; THE STATE SUPREME COURT FOR ITS ACQUIESCE TO THE CLERKS UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal fr om the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv

- 00174

- GMG )

Submitted : August 26, 2021 Decided: September 9, 2021

Before WILKINSON, KING, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Aaron Lee Hairston , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Aaron Lee Hairston appeals the district court’s order a ccepting in part the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hairston’s complaint . We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Hairston v. Jackson , No. 3:20

- cv

- 00174

- GMG (N.D.W. Va.

Mar. 22, 2021) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | (1) | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
|  /s/ Chene Gardner |
| Chene Gardner,               |
| Chief Financial Officer      |
| Chief Executive Officer      |
|                         |
|                         |
|                         |
#### LEHRMAN v. LAMPHERE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2021

a0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2021

162334

DONNA CONFORTI, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF JOHN CONFORTI,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 162334

COA: 348745

Macomb CC: 2017-002406-NI

STANLEY WEBSTER CORNELL and METRO

CONTROLS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### PALMISONO v. CITY OF HIALEAH.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Hecla
Mining Company and Subsidiaries
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 I, James
A. Sabala, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hecla Mining
Company (“Hecla”), certify that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              This
      annual report of Hecla on Form 10-K (“report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Hecla.
 
 
 
 Date:  February
17, 2010


/s/ James A. SabalaJames A. SabalaSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Hecla and will be retained by Hecla and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished in accordance with Securities and
Exchange Commission Release No. 34-47551 and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable R. Brooke Jackson

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02496-RBJ-KMT

DARRYL J. JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITY,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

This matter has been scheduled for a four-day jury trial on the docket of Judge R. 

Brooke Jackson in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A902, 9th Floor, 901 19th Street, 

Denver, Colorado, to commence on May 28, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. 

A Trial Preparation Conference is set for May 10, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel who will 

try the case shall attend in person. 

During the Trial Preparation Conference the parties should be prepared to address: jury 

instructions, jury selection, witnesses and evidence, anticipated evidentiary issues, stipulations as 

to fact, and any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial.

For additional information, please review my practice standards located at 

www.cod.uscourts.gov/Judges/Judges.aspx.

Case 1:11-cv-02496-RBJ-KMT Document 28 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DATED this 23rd day of May, 2012.

BY THE COURT: 

___________________________________

R. Brooke Jackson

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02496-RBJ-KMT Document 28 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the following matter will be added to the “summary agenda” for consideration at the open meeting of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation scheduled to be held at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550-17th Street, NW., Washington, DC:

Memorandum and resolution re: Interagency Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Capital Treatment of Certain Claims on or Guaranteed by, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac).

                    This Board meeting will be Webcast live via the Internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the event. Visit                     *http://www.vodium.com/​goto/​fdic/​boardmeetings.asp*                     to view the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video Help page at:                     *http://www.fdic.gov/​video.html*.                

The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to make necessary arrangements.

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Ms. Valerie J. Best, Assistant Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7043.

Dated: October 2, 2008.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Valerie J. Best,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-23801 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge David L. West

Criminal No. 11-MJ-00148-DLW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

1. EDWIN LEHI, JR.,

Defendant.

 

MINUTE ORDER RESCHEDULING ARRAIGNMENT

AND DISCOVERY CONFERENCE HEARING

 

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID L. WEST

The Magistrate Judge’s office has conferred with counsel and there are no objections,

therefore;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Arraignment and Discovery Conference Hearing

previously scheduled for October 6, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. is VACATED and RESCHEDULED for

October 11, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. before the Magistrate Judge in Durango, Colorado.

DATED: September 26, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/David L. West 

United States Magistrate Judge