alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEPHEN FREDERICK BAKER JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 445 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EX-32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 24Holdings  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Roger Woodward,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                                  /s/ ROGER WOODWARD
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  ROGER WOODWARD
                                                  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATED:  NOVEMBER 21, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER VIN # JTEES42A182076495;

Defendants.

 

MOTION TO SEAL

The United States of America, by and through Attorney General of the United States Eric

Holder, Barry R. Grissom, United States Attorney for the District of Kansas, through Special

Attorneys Richard L. Hathaway and Christine E. Kenney, move the Court to enter an Order

sealing the Verified Complaint For Forfeiture In Rem, the government’s Motion to Seal, the

Order to Seal, and any Order resulting from the Verified Complaint, and as grounds therefore

states:

1. The Verified Complaint For Forfeiture In Rem and this motion have been filed as

a part of a continuing investigation.

2. The targets of the criminal investigation have fled the United States and believed

to currently be in country of South Africa.

1

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 2 filed 08/11/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
3. The release of the information in the Verified Complaint For Forfeiture In Rem

would substantially jeopardize the security and the method of the investigation.

WHEREFORE the government moves this Honorable Court to enter an Order sealing the

Verified Complaint For Forfeiture In Rem, this Motion to Seal, and any order issued by this

Court with regarding to the Verified Complaint, against everyone except attorneys and

employees of the Office of the U.S. Attorney, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the

Internal Revenue/Criminal Investigation Division, until the defendants have been located and

arrested, or until further order of this Court.

DATED this 11 day of August, 2011. th

Respectfully submitted,

ERIC HOLDER

Attorney General of the United States

BARRY R. GRISSOM

United States Attorney

/s/Richard L. Hathaway

RICHARD L. HATHAWAY #07767

Special Attorney

444 S.E. Quincy, Suite 290

Topeka, KS 66683-3592

Tel: 785-295-2850

Fax: 785-295-2853 

rich.hathaway@usdoj.gov

/s/Christine E. Kenney

CHRISTINE E. KENNEY #13542

Special Attorney

christine.kenney@usdoj.gov

2

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 2 filed 08/11/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 7 committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via telephone conference call.  The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2008.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 7 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2008, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference call.  The public is invited to make oral comments.  Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Janice Spinks, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Janice Spinks.  Miss Spinks can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

*The agenda will include the following:*                     Various IRS issues.                

Dated: September 26, 2008.

Roy L. Block,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E8-23633 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133224-5 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

HELEN CARGAS, Individually and as Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of PERRY Justices CARGAS,
 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133224-5 

 COA: 263869; 263870 

Oakland CC: 01-007603-AV 

GLENN BEDNARSH and MICHAEL 

ESSHAKI, d/b/a MEL’S DINER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior Judge John L. Kane

Date: May 10, 2012 Deputy Clerk: Bernique Abiakam

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02378-AP

ERMIN KRESO, M.D., Ellen E. Stewart

Rosemary Orsini

Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC SHINSEKI, Secretary, United States

Department of Veterans Affairs, and

UNITED STATES VETERANS 

ADMINISTRATION, Susan B. Prose

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES

Motion Hearing

9:29 a.m. Court in session.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also present, Mike Gurnee, agency counsel. 

Preliminary remarks by the Court.

Discussion regarding Doc. No. 19.

9:30 a.m. Argument by Ms. Orsini.

9:46 a.m. Argument by Ms. Prose.

9:58 a.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Orsini.

10:04 a.m. Comments and ruling by the Court.

ORDERED: Plaintiff Dr. Kreso’s Motion To Compel completion Of The Administrative

Record And To Organize The Administrative Record To Allow For Adequate

Review (Filed 4/30/12; Doc. No. 19) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in

PART as specified.

10:05 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.

Time in court - 00:36 

Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 23 Filed 05/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00345-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JUAN FRANCISCO-MIGUEL, a/k/a Juan Thomas, a/k/a Juan Andres Francisco,

a/k/a Jesse Martinez ,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure all pre-trial

phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by Monday, October 10, 2011

and responses to these motions shall be filed by Wednesday, October 19, 2011. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on all pending motions, if any, and final trial

preparation conference will not be set at this time. Should a hearing become

necessary, the parties shall contact Chambers. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a 3-day jury trial is set for Monday, October 31,

2011 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002.

Dated: September 22, 2011. BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted January 20, 2011

Decided January 25, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS

, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 2364

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee,

v.

CURTIS R. ALLEN,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

Fort Wayne Division.

No. 1:09

‐ CR

‐ 102

‐ TLS

Theresa L. Springmann,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Curtis Allen subscribed to an Internet file

‐ sharing service that allowed other

members to access child pornography stored on his personal computer. Indiana authorities

searched his residence pursuant to a warrant and uncovered more than 600 images of child

pornography on the computer and data discs. Allen was arrested and pleaded guilty to

separate counts of receiving and possessing child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2),

(4)(b). By statute he faced a minium of 5 years imprisonment. See id. § 2252(b). The district

court sentenced Allen to a total of 97 months’ imprisonment, at the bottom of the guidelines

range. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 10

‐ 2364 Page 2

Allen filed a notice of appeal, but his newly appointed appellate counsel has

concluded that the case is frivolous and seeks permission to withdraw. See Anders v.

California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Allen has not accepted our invitation to comment on

counsel ʹ s facially adequate submission. See C IR

. R. 51(b). We limit our review to the

potential issue she discusses. See United States v. Schuh

, 289 F.3d 968, 973

‐ 74 (7th Cir. 2002).

In her brief counsel represents that Allen does not want his guilty pleas vacated.

Thus she appropriately omits discussion about the adequacy of the plea colloquy, see F ED

. R.

C RIM

. P. 11(b), and the voluntariness of the pleas

. See United States v. Knox

, 287 F.3d 667, 671

(7th Cir. 2002). According to counsel, the appeal presents only one potential argument:

whether Allen could challenge the reasonableness of his overall prison term. The probation

officer calculated a guidelines imprisonment range of 97 to 121 months, which the district

court adopted without objection. The court heard testimony at sentencing from two of

Allen’s brothers and imposed a sentence at the bottom of the range after considering the

factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and weighing Allen’s arguments in mitigation, including his

health issues and strong family ties. The sentence Allen received is within the

imprisonment range and thus is presumed reasonable. See Rita v. United States

, 551 U.S. 338,

347 (2007); United States v. Liddell

, 543 F.3d 877, 885 (7th Cir. 2008). Counsel has not

identified any factor that would overcome that presumption, nor have we.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5186-N-41]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 10, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized,                           ( print page 60312)                        excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: October 2, 2008.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

 [FR Doc. E8-23786 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mark H. Cosmez II, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Giga-tronics, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: 5/30/06       /s/ Mark H. Cosmez II         Mark H. Cosmez II    VP Finance, CFO and Secretary  
47
EXHIBIT 10.1

March 27, 2009

Via Electronic Mail

Compensation Committee of

The Board of Directors

Taylor Capital Group, Inc.

9550 West Higgins Road

Rosemont, Illinois 60018

Re: Voluntary Reduction in Compensation

Dear Fellow Board Members,

As you know, our management team has made
significant progress in positioning Cole Taylor Bank to execute successfully on our growth strategy, even in these most challenging market conditions. A large part of our focus in this regard has involved minimizing or eliminating our operational
expenditures to ensure that as much of our capital as possible is deployed for lending activities. With respect to compensation expense in particular, I believe we have made prudent decisions and managed our costs effectively. And with your
oversight and support, we have recently identified several areas in which our organization will benefit from further reductions in compensation expense.

I
have given considerable thought to ways in which I can personally help our efforts, including reviewing my own compensation. As a result of this review, I believe that it would be appropriate for me, as a leader of our organization, to sacrifice a
portion of my salary until market conditions and our performance improve. To that end, I hereby offer and agree to a 20% reduction in my base salary (from $525,200 to $420,000) and to forego my auto allowance and reimbursements for country club
expenditures (with the exception of expenses directly associated with customer events). I would ask that the Compensation Committee reevaluate my compensation at September 30, 2009 and on a quarterly basis thereafter and, if appropriate,
restore my compensation to its current level.

Thank you for your continued leadership and please let me know if you have any questions or would like to
discuss this matter further.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Very truly yours,                   
|                                    
|/s/ Bruce W. Taylor                 
|Bruce W. Taylor                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



1
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
Case 1:11-cv-02371-CMA-MJW Document 45 Filed 03/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT  23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements  on  Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-56590, 33-71700, as amended by Post-Effective
Amendments  No. One and Two, 333-77617, and 333-76296) of Pizza Inn, Inc. of our
report  dated  August 23, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements
and  financial  statement  schedule,  which  appears  in  this  Form  10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman LLP
BDO  Seidman,  LLP

Dallas,  Texas
September  23,  2004
AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                                      LEASE
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
                          OBIE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                                       AND
                             OBIE MEDIA CORPORATION

                  This Amendment No. 1 to Lease (this "Amendment No. 1") is made
and  entered  into  as  of  July  15,  1997  by  and  between  Obie   Industries
Incorporated, an Oregon corporation ("Landlord"), and Obie Media Corporation, an
Oregon  corporation  ("Tenant"),  for the purpose of amending and modifying that
certain  Lease dated  November 12, 1996 by and between  Landlord and Tenant (The
"Lease").

                  NOW  THEREFORE,  for  good  and  valuable  consideration,  the
receipt and  sufficiency of which are hereby  acknowledged,  Landlord and Tenant
agree as follows:

                  1.    The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Lease is hereby
                  amended to read as follows:

                  "Tenant shall  pay to Landlord  as rent for the Premises equal
                  monthly installments of $14,258."

                  2.    Section 4.4  of the  Lease  is  hereby  amended  in  its
                  entirety to read as follows:

                  "4.4  TENANT IMPROVEMENTS.   Tenant shall be responsible for a
                  total of $290,041 of  tenant  improvements in  connection with
                  the renovation of the Premises."

                  3. As  amended  hereby,  the Lease  remains  in full force and
                  effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Landlord  and  Tenant  have executed this
                  Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.

"LANDLORD"                                          "TENANT"

OBIE INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED                        OBIE MEDIA CORPORATION


By  /s/  Brian B. Obie                              By  /s/  Brian B. Obie
  -------------------------                            -------------------------
   Brian B. Obie, President                          Brian B. Obie, President
                                                     and Chief Executive Officer