alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                         /s/ Jacques Mot
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jacques Mot
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                         January 19, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01948-BNB-CBS

KATHRYN KIPLING,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Minnesota

Division of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Defendant.

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Defendant State Farm’s Motion for Stay of Execution on Judgment Pending

Resolution of Appeal [Doc. # 104, filed 6/17/2013] (the “Motion to Stay”); and

(2) Defendant State Farm’s Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond [Doc. #

105, filed 6/17/2013] (the “Motion to Approve Bond”).

The plaintiff does not object to either motion, stating that she “stipulates and agrees that

she will stay execution on the judgment pending resolution of appeal,” Response [Doc. # 107] at

¶1, and that she “does not require Defendant to post a supersedeas bond based on Plaintiff’s

agreement to stay execution of the judgment.” Response [Doc. # 106] at ¶1.

Rule 62(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides in relevant part:

(b) Stay Pending the Disposition of a Motion. On appropriate

terms for the opposing party’s security, the court may stay the

execution of a judgment--or any proceedings to enforce it--pending

disposition of any of the following motions:

* * *

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 108 Filed 06/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

(3) under Rule 59, for a new trial or to alter or amend a judgment.

* * *

(d) Stay with Bond on Appeal. If an appeal is taken, the

appellant may obtain a stay by supersedeas bond. . . . The bond

may be given upon or after filing the notice of appeal or after

obtaining the order allowing the appeal. The stay takes effect

when the court approves the bond.

Although the Motion to Approve Bond recites that “State Farm will post a bond in the

amount of $4,500,000.00"; “[t]he bond to be posted by State Farm is in the form of a corporate

surety bond, issued by a corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of Colorado”;

and the bond “is accompanied by a power of attorney showing the authority of the agent for the

surety signing the bond,” no form of bond is provided for my review. I cannot approve a bond

without the opportunity to review its full terms.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 104] is GRANTED pending the determination of the

defendant’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; and

(2) The Motion to Approve Bond [Doc. # 105] is DENIED without prejudice to being

renewed with a copy of the proposed bond attached to the renewed motion as an exhibit.

Dated June 24, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01948-NYW-CBS Document 108 Filed 06/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02391-RPM-KMT Document 46 Filed 11/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Obie Media Corporation (the Company )
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Gary F.
Livesay, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/Gary F. Livesay
          Vice President
          Chief Financial Officer
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**March 2009**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: March 09, 2009**
Case 1:11-cv-02250-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02250-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02250-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02250-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP.

MORTGAGEíBACKED SECURITIES

LITIGATION MDL No. 2265

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER

The transferee court in this litigation has advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial

proceedings in the action(s) on this conditional remand order have been completed and that remand

to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), is appropriate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action(s) on this conditional remand order be remanded to

its/their respective transferor court(s).

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States

Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal of this order to the transferee clerk for

filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with

the Clerk of the Panel within this 7íday period, the stay will be continued until further order of the

Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United

States District Court for the Central District of California.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for

the Central District of California with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be

remanded.

FOR THE PANEL:

 Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel

Case MDL No. 2265 Document 531 Filed 12/30/14 Page 1 of 2

Dec 30, 2014

FILED

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY: ___________________ DEPUTY

2:11-cv-10400-MRP-MANx

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al

CP

3/17/15

Case 2:11-cv-10400-MRP-MAN Document 275 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:12755

I hereby attest and certify on _________ 

that the foregoing document is full, true 

and correct copy of the original on file in 

my office, and in my legal custody. 

CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPUTY CLERK

4/3/2015

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 43 Filed 04/03/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
IN RE: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP.

MORTGAGEíBACKED SECURITIES

LITIGATION MDL No. 2265

SCHEDULE FOR CRO

TRANSFEREE TRANSFEROR

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CAC 2 12í08317 ALM 2 12í00784 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v.

Countrywide Securities Corporation et al

CAC 2 11í10400 CO 1 11í02268 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v.

Countrywide Financial Corporation et al

Case 2:11-cv-10400-MRP-MAN Document 275 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:12756 Case MDL No. 2265 Document 531 Filed 12/30/14 Page 2 of 2

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 43 Filed 04/03/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Millie V. BRUNDIDGE v. STATE.

4 Div. 109.

Court of Appeals of Alabama.

April 30, 1935.

A. A. .Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD, Judge.

The’defendant was indicted on a charge of assault to- murder and on her trial was convicted of assault and battery.

The verdict of the jury had the effect of acquitting the defendant of the charge of as*916sault to murder, .and hence it becomes unnecessary for us to pass upon any questions relating alone to that charge. We have examined the record relative to the charge of assault and battery, and nowhere do we find error. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors of Bovie Medical Corporation





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number 333-195624 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-200986 on Form S-3 of Bovie Medical Corporation, of our report dated March 31, 2014, except for Note 19 as to which the date is May 8, 2014, on the consolidated balance sheet of Bovie Medical Corporation as of December 31, 2013, and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K..








/s/ Kingery & Crouse, P.A.





Tampa, Florida


October 31, 2016
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending December 15, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
#### Frank Kandler et al., Appellants, v Suffolk County Division of Real Estate, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 713]

In an action to compel specific performance of a real estate contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated February 1, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the purported oral contract for the purchase of the subject real property is unenforceable *(see*General Obligations Law § 5-703 [1]; *Ghura v Islip Resource Recovery Agency,*122 AD2d 106). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 1744

- 17T1

DESTINY DICKENS, an infant,

by her G uardian A d L item,

YVONE SMITH, and YVONE

SMITH, individually,

Plaintiff s

- Respondent s

,

v.

IRVINGTON BOARD OF

EDUCATION

,

Defendant

- Appellant

,

and

DEREK STRONG,

Defendant.

_____________________________

Submitted November 29, 2018

– Decided

Before Judges O'Connor and Whipple.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Essex County, Docket No. L

- 6221

- 15.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

March 28, 20192 A

- 1744

- 17T1 Hunt, Hamlin & Ridley, Mauro

, Lilling

, Naparty,

LLP, and Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, PC, attorneys

for appellant (Car y n L. Lilling, of counsel and on the

brief ).

Kirsch, Gelband & Stone, attorneys for respondent

(Gregg Alan Stone, of counsel and on the brief;

Ronald J. Morgan, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues

in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Date: June 28, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: Julie Dynes FTR BNB COURTROOM A-401 

Isadore Brown Traci Christy

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Garcia, Denver Police Officers Stuart Shapiro

Roman Yepshin Cristina Pena Helm

Sergey Gurevich

Joey Smith

City and County of Denver

Defendant(s).

COURTROOM MINUTES

HEARING: MOTIONS

Court in session: 2:03 p.m.

Appearances of counsel.

Court’s opening remarks.

Argument presented. 

Deadlines amended as follows:

Discovery cut-off: September 14, 2012. 

Dispositive motion filing deadline: October 12, 2012.

Final Pretrial Conference: November 1, 2012.

ORDERED: Motion to Compel [37] is DENIED as moot, request for attorney fees is 

DENIED.

Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Attorney [34] is GRANTED.

Court in Recess 2:19 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:16

* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Case 1:11-cv-02441-REB-BNB Document 40 Filed 06/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of MB Tech, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 2006. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of MB Tech, Inc. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of MB Tech, Inc., is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 30, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 13, 2008. 

By the Commission. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-23378 Filed 9-30-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1203 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 358
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1203

                          [Report No. 110-160]

To enhance the management of electricity programs at the Department of 
                                Energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2007

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Domenici) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 17, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To enhance the management of electricity programs at the Department of 
                                Energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Energy Electricity 
Programs Enhancement Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(a) of the Department of Energy 
Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended in the first sentence 
by striking ``7 Assistant Secretaries'' and inserting ``8 Assistant 
Secretaries''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5315 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``Assistant Secretaries of Energy (7)'' 
and inserting ``Assistant Secretaries of Energy (8)''.
    (c) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that leadership 
for missions of the Department of Energy relating to electricity 
delivery and reliability should be at the Assistant Secretary level.
                                                       Calendar No. 358

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1203

                          [Report No. 110-160]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To enhance the management of electricity programs at the Department of 
                                Energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 17, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
鉤

 ̈

吻

C..o3u5n..t

。

y7

剛

脚剛

.‐。 ̈

柵皿20‐2

ン

S

0 。

0

的

“

・

^υ

一P

a

ス

)

・

r

S l

S 0

2

b

R

D

」 P

r

∞

A

′

ス

き・ NEX AStIMTED STATES OF ANIERICA GRANTOR AND MARIE DALTON AS

G...

IN THE IJMTED STATES DISIRICT COuRT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Ci宙l Action No ll‐02106‐ PAB‐CBS

UNITED STATES OF′ 曲凋ERICA,

Plaint範

V

927 COLE STREET,GOLDEN,COLORADO,and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLADER VIN#JTEES42A182076495;

Dcfcndants.

|ン 」k

NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS

NAME OF RECORD TITLE OWNER: Marie Dalton

Notice is hereby given of the pendency of a cMl action hought by the plaintiff agahst the

below described real property by a verified complaint offorfeihrc filed with the Clerk ofthe United

States District Court for the Distict ofColorado, which action was brought for the forfeitwe ofthe

defendant real property pursuant to lE U.S.C. $ 981.

The pmperty which is the subject of this action is located at 927 Cole Sheet, Golde&

Colorado, more particularly described as:

Parcel B, Exemption Survey Section 6, Township 4 South, Range 69 West, E l8-3-93

according to the Exemption Survey Recorded June 4, 1993 at Recrpdon No.

930796214 in Book 1 I 3 at Page 26, County ofJeffersoq State of Colorado.

言 GOVERNMENT

L EXHIB:T

E 14

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-14 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 1

of 2
ノ

For fuJ山 (r rOma,。n conccnllng thc action fOr fbrfelれ re,referenceェnay be made to the

r∝ords ofthe Clerk ofぬ e Cout forthe Udted States Dis饉 ct Court,Disdct ofColorado,901

196 Street Dcnvcr,Colorado 80294.

DATED this_day ofNovember2 2011

Resp∝Iヽ1ly sub血tcd,

ERIC HOLDER

Attomcy Gcneral ofthc United Sutes

BARRY R.GRISSOM

μ _′′

RICHARD L HATHAWAY

Special Atto叫

444S_EQ」ncyt Suitc 290

Topeka KS“ 683‐3592

Tel:785-295‐ 2850

Fax:785.29512853

CHttSTNE E:KEblNEY#

cMsine kennevのusdd gov

う

ん

Case No. 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 78-14 filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado pg 2

of 2
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0198. CUPPETT v. MIRTSCHINK et al. 

We granted plaintiff Sharon Cuppett’s interlocutory application to consider

whether the trial court erred in applying Alabama law to this action, which arises

fromCuppett’sfall down a flight of stairs at the defendants’ Alabama lake house. The

interlocutory appeal was docketed on August 14, 2019. 

Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, we now DISMISS this

appeal as improvidently granted. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 05, 2020

02/05/2020
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2006   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2007   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2008   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 2  | .     |
| 2009   | 2  | 3  | 2  | .  | .     |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0420

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES MICHAEL BYRNE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 20, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 15 2020

06/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0420