alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(2)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Hycor Biomedical Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Reginald
P. Jones, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to
the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

Date: March 28, 2003            By: /s/ Reginald P. Jones
      --------------                --------------------------------------------
                                    Reginald P. Jones
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hycor Biomedical Inc. and will be retained by Hycor Biomedical Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action: 11-cv-02094-PAB-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Date: October 21, 2011 Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera

Parties: Counsel:

MARC HARRIS KAPLAN,

Plaintiff,

Pro Se (by phone)

v.

MICHELLE L. ARCHER,

KARLA JEAN HANSEN,

KIRK STEWART SAMELSON, 

HAROLD BUTTS,

TERRY MAKETA, 

DAN MAY,

JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER,

WILLIAM TRUJILLO, and

JOHN W. SUTHERS,

Defendants.

Skippere S. Spear

Diana May (by phone)

Skippere S. Spear

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: PRELIMINARY RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Court in session: 10:03 a.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Plaintiff advises the court he will file an amended complaint.

Discussion regarding the distinction between classes of citizens.

Discusses between the court and Plaintiff regarding the law and how it pertains to this case.

ORDERED: Motion for a More Definite Statement by Defendants John Hickenlooper, John

Suthers, William Trujillo, Kirk Samelson, Karla Hansen, Harold Butts and Michelle

Archer Doc.#[6] is DENIED.

Case 1:11-cv-02094-PAB-CBS Document 18 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED: County Defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

12(e) and 8 Doc.#[8] is DENIED.

ORDERED: Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before November 10, 2011.

HEARING CONCLUDED. 

Court in recess: 10:22 a.m. 

Total time in court: 00:19

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods

Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case 1:11-cv-02094-PAB-CBS Document 18 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02403-MSK-MEH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARD A. CRAWFORD, Owner, Home Construction Company,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 23rd day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
(1) Statements of Balance Sheets, (2) Statement of Operations, and
(3) Statements of Cash Flows, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,023                   3,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,568                   3,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                       478                     722
<INVENTORY>                                      5,003                   4,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,444                  12,600
<PP&E>                                          19,146                  20,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,331                   9,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,796                  24,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,970                   2,884
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            93                      94
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,733                  21,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,796                  24,247
<SALES>                                         23,559                  23,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,559                  23,625
<CGS>                                            9,530                  10,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,814                  12,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,006                   2,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (37)                   (233)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    246                 (1,605)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20                      10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                226                 (1,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       226                 (1,615)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                   (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                   (.17)
        


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1189 

To designate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 

at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2007 

Mr. PRYOR (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 

4 AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

6 States Courthouse, located at 100 East 8th Avenue in 

7 Pine Bluff, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as 

2 

•S 1189 IS

1 the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and United 

2 States Courthouse’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the Federal building and United States Court6 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

7 a reference to the ‘‘George Howard, Jr. Federal Building 

8 and United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATIONS**








I,
      Michael S. Shore, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SMF Energy
      Corporation;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
      May
      15, 2008








/s/
      Michael S.
      Shore


Michael
      S. Shore


Chief
      Financial Officer and Senior Vice President






42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                  281,922
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         6,682,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           1,483,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      8,486,870
<PP&E>                                  930,107
<DEPRECIATION>                          308,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        9,121,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   999,110
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 12,140
<OTHER-SE>                            6,395,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,121,670
<SALES>                               2,053,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      2,639,072
<CGS>                                 1,081,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         2,390,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        9,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         248,659
<INCOME-TAX>                             84,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     164,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            164,115
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.014
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.007


</TABLE>
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending July 3, 2021

---





## Enforcement

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Sujit Sircar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    SUJIT SIRCAR                 
|Sujit Sircar Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 6, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1347 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1347

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as of 
  which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 
 deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 
                        activities on the land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA.

    Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act (Public Law 106-
568; 114 Stat. 2919) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``Notwithstanding'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Acceptance of Land.--Notwithstanding'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The Secretary'' 
        and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Declaration.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by striking the third sentence and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class II Gaming.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), 
        notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Lytton 
        Rancheria of California may conduct activities for class II 
        gaming (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) on the land taken into trust under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Requirement.--The Lytton Rancheria of California 
        shall not expand the exterior physical measurements of any 
        facility on the Lytton Rancheria in use for class II gaming 
        activities on the date of enactment of this paragraph.
    ``(d) Treatment of Land for Purposes of Class III Gaming.--
Notwithstanding subsection (a), for purposes of class III gaming (as 
defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 
2703)), the land taken into trust under this section shall be treated, 
for purposes of section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 
U.S.C. 2719), as if the land was acquired on October 9, 2003, the date 
on which the Secretary took the land into trust.''.

            Passed the Senate November 5, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1347

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as of 
  which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 
 deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 
                        activities on the land.
```
II 

Calendar No. 161 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1352 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2007 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 22, 2007 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 127 East Locust Street in Fairbury, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. FRANCIS TOWNSEND POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 127 East Locust Street in 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

S 1352 RS

1 Fairbury, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Calendar No. 161 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1352 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Fairbury, Illinois, as the ‘‘Dr. Francis Townsend al Service located at 127 East Locust Street in 

MAY 22, 2007 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 6/11/08 |   |                                                                     |   |
|--------|---------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |    |   |                                                                     |   |
|   |    |   | /s/      PATRICK J. LAWLOR                                               |   |
|   |    |   | Patrick      J. Lawlor                                                   |   |
|   |    |   | Vice      President Finance,Chief      Financial Officer & Secretary |   |
#### Anna Robinson et al., Respondents, *v.*City of New York, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 20, 1956.

*Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Eugene J. Keefe*and *Seymour B. Quel*of counsel), for appellant.

*Arnold V. Schwarts*and *Isadore Aberlin*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Under the court’s charge the verdict could have been based upon negligent overcrowding or negligence in permitting the nun to sit in the terminal seeking alms. The evidence adduced at the trial does not establish a dangerous overcrowding or that the crowd was so excessive as to threaten plaintiff’s safety. There was no disorderliness or gang action. The alleged overcrowding and lack of guards were not the contributory causes of her fall. Plaintiff’s own testimony is to the effect that she was in a hurry to catch the 5 o’clock boat and that a man stepped aside and she hit something hard and did not see the nun sitting there. But, as a matter of law, the plaintiff is bound to see objects which by the proper use of her senses she might have seen *(Abair*v. *City of New York,*295 N. Y. 789; *Weigand*v. *United Traction Co.,*221 N. Y. 39).

*715The judgment should he reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.