IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02097-REB-KMT

M. GABRIEL McFARLAND,

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANS UNION,

EQUIFAX, and

EXPERIAN, INC., 

Defendants.

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER 

Blackburn, J.

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 43.1, and REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.C.1., the

court enters this Trial Preparation Conference Order.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That in order to resolve pretrial issues implicating Fed.R.Evid. 702, the

following procedural protocol shall be used:

 a. That expert reports shall conform in substance to the requirements of

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) and shall contain and include the following:

1. a complete statement of each expert opinion to be expressed

and the bases and reasons therefor; 

2. the facts, data, and other information considered by the witness

in forming each expert opinion; 

3. any exhibits to be used as a summary of or support for each

expert opinion; 

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
2

4. the qualifications of the witness, including a list of all publications

authored by the witness within the preceding ten years, stated in a curriculum vitae

(“c.v.”); 

5. the compensation to be paid the expert for the study and

testimony; and 

6. a listing of any other cases in which the witness has testified as

an expert at trial or by deposition within the preceding four years;

b. That all motions raising issues under Fed.R.Evid. 702 as codified and

construed shall be filed by July 11, 2012, and marshaled thereafter as prescribed by

D.C.COLO.LCiv 7.1C; 

c. That for each putative expert witness with respect to whom the movant

objects for any reason, the movant shall provide the following:

1. whether the movant contends that the testimony of the expert is

unnecessary or irrelevant; and if so, why;

2. whether the movant objects to the qualifications of the witness;

and if so, why (stated in detail); and

3. whether the movant objects to any opinion to be offered by the

expert; and if so:

a. which opinion; and

b. the specific basis and authority for any objection stated

and presented in terms of Fed.R.Evid. 401 and/or 702(1), (2), or (3), i.e., whether the

objection impugns the relevance of the opinion, whether the objection impugns the

sufficiency of the facts and data used in support of the opinion, whether the objection

impugns the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of the opinion,

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
3

or whether the objection impugns how the expert has applied the principles and

methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion; and

d. That for each putative expert witness whose necessity, qualifications, or

opinions are opposed by the movant, the party offering the expert shall provide in

response to the motion the following:

1. a c.v.for the expert;

2. a statement of each opinion to be offered by the expert that is

opposed by the movant; and

3. the relevance and bases for each allegedly objectionable

statement to be offered by the expert, including

a. the facts or data on which the expert relied in support of

the opinion made the focus and subject of objection;

b. the principles and methods on which the expert relied in

support of the opinion made the focus and subject of objection; and

c. how the expert has applied the principles and methods

reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinion made the focus and subject of

objection;

2. That trial to the court shall commence October 1, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., in

courtroom A1001,on the tenth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj, United States Courthouse

Annex, at 901 19th St., Denver, Colorado 80294, at which all parties shall appear in

person without further notice, order, or subpoena;

3. That the court reserves three (3) days for trial;

4. That counsel and any pro se party shall appear in courtroom A1001 on the first

day of trial, at 8:30 a.m., to review the Trial Checklist with the courtroom deputy clerk;

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
4

5. That the Trial Preparation Conference required by REB Civ. Practice

Standard IV.C.1., shall commence on September 28, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., in courtroom

A1001;

6. That lead counsel and any pro se party shall attend the Trial Preparation

Conference;

7. That at the outset of the Trial Preparation Conference, the parties shall submit

one Parties’ Joint Exhibit List on the form required by the court (an original for the court

with copies for the courtroom deputy clerk, the court reporter and all other parties) and 

each party shall submit on the Witness List form required by the court (an original for

the court with copies for the courtroom deputy clerk and all other parties) a “will call”

witness list enumerating the name and address (city or county and state only) of each

witness that will be called and a “may call” witness list enumerating the name and

address (city or county and state only) of each witness that may be called; provided,

furthermore, that the “will call” witness list constitutes a representation on which the

court and every other party may rely that the witnesses listed will be present and

available to testify during trial;

8. That at the Trial Preparation Conference the parties shall be prepared to

review and discuss, inter alia, the following:

a. identification of “will call” and “may call” witnesses;

b. the estimated time for direct examination of each “will call” witness;

c. the pronunciation of problematic party’s and witness’ names;

d. use of deposition testimony;

e. use of video depositions:

1. resolution of objections;

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
5

2. pretrial redaction, if necessary; and

3. arrangements for necessary equipment to broadcast the

deposition;

f. the allocation of trial time between the parties;

g. identification of all persons permitted to be seated at each party’s table

[Please review Fed.R.Evid. 615];

h. the names or monikers that may be used when referring to a party or a

witness;

i. the admission of stipulated exhibits or exhibits about which there are no

objections;

j. anticipated evidentiary issues; and 

k. requests or requirement for trial briefs;

9. That trial witnesses subject to sequestration under Fed.R.Evid. 615 shall be

sequestered by order entered sua sponte immediately before opening statements;

10. That opening statements shall be limited to thirty (30) minutes per party;

11. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard III.D.4.b., each party shall have

available at trial a set of exhibits for the court, the courtroom deputy clerk, opposing

counsel (one set per party), and any pro se party;

12. That unless interrupted by the court, in marshaling motions or objections

during trial, the following sequential protocol shall be observed: objection, response,

reply, ruling;

13. That if permitted, closing argument shall be limited to forty-five (45) minutes

total for each party; and 

14. That pursuant to REB Civ. Practice Standard IV.C.2.b., the Final Pretrial

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
[Revised December 1, 2010] 6

Order as modified or supplemented by this Trial Preparation Conference Order and any

order entered during the trial preparation conference shall control the subsequent

course of this action and the trial, and may not be amended except by consent of the

parties and approval of the court or by order of the court to prevent manifest injustice.

Dated November 8, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02097-REB-KMT Document 18 Filed 11/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6