alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          82,408                  82,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,960                  65,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,040                   1,132
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,243                 152,700
<PP&E>                                          10,080                  12,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,772                   2,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,474                 164,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,251                  33,537
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           236                     474
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,277                 129,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,474                 164,401
<SALES>                                        195,967                  69,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,967                  69,768
<CGS>                                          135,149                  46,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,957                  59,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   518                     129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   995                      90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,414)                   (736)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,010                  10,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,404                   4,339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,606                   6,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,606                   6,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36                    0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36                    0.14
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
   I, Mark R. Doede, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Integral Vision, Inc.;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report(the “Evaluation Date”); and  c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 6.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
Date: March 29, 2005      /S/ Mark R. Doede   Mark R. Doede   Chief Financial Officer
| Skip to Content*Release Date: December 9, 2004*Release dates |  Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB)**F.208 Open Market Paper** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
(August 16, 1990)

#### Michael Butler et al., Plaintiffs, v Henry Primavera et al., Defendants. Harvey Brown, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Sherwood A. Salvan, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered April 20, 1989, denying third-party defendant’s motion for summary dismissal of the third-party complaint, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On his motion for summary judgment, third-party defendant Sherwood Allen Salvan failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that defendant and third-party plaintiff Harvey Brown, a lawyer being sued by former clients for malpractice, does not have a viable claim for contribution against Salvan, who subsequently represented the client in the same matter *(see, Schauer v Joyce,*54 NY2d 1). Additionally, Salvan failed to provide sufficient evidentiary proof that the underlying main action, in which he represented plaintiffs, was marked "off” the calendar within the meaning of CPLR 3404 in February of 1986, so as to require a motion to restore to the calendar *(see, e.g.,*22 NYCRR 208.31).

We have considered the third-party defendant’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Asch, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

*795Murphy, P. J., and Carro, J.,

dissent in a memorandum by Carro, J., as follows: I would grant the motion by third-party defendant Sherwood Allen Salvan seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. In this action for legal malpractice, it appears to me that there is no factual basis upon which defendant and third-party plaintiff Harvey Brown predicated his third-party action for contribution against Sal-van. (C*f., Schauer v Joyce,*54 NY2d 1, 6-7 [1981].) Accordingly, I dissent.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Heritage Bankshares, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company do each hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 26, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John O. Guthrie    
|                     |  |  |  | John O. Guthrie,       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



77
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00409

- CV

Frederick O. SILVER

, Appellant

v.

TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING TEXAS, INC., ET AL.

, Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CI

- 05365

Honorable Rosie Al varado, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Mario n, C hief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Ju stice

On October 16, 2019, we issued an opinion and judgment affirming the trial court’s June 5, 20 19 Order on Ability to Pay Costs and ordering appellant to pay the $205 notice of appeal filing fee within 15 days. After we issued our opinion and judgment , appellant filed a “Response to Judgment and Order to Pay $205 Appeal Fee” and a “Response to Affir med as to June 5, 2019 Order on Ability to Pay Costs.” We construe these filings as motions for rehearing of our October 16, 2019 opinion and judgment

. See Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC , 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2017, no pet.) (noting that “we liberally construe pro se pleadings and briefs”).

The panel has considered appellant’s motion s for rehearing. The motion s are DENIED.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

We ORDER appellant to pay the $205 filing fee for this appeal to this court within 15 days of the date of our October 16, 2019 opinion and judgment . We caution appellant that the failure to pay the filing fee will result in the dismissal of his appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5, 42 .3.__ _______________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affi xed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ L uz E strada

, Chief Deputy Clerk
# **Exhibit31.1**

I, R. Herbert Hampton,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Golden Cycle Gold Corporation:

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.              [intentionallyomitted];

c.               Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d.              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

1.               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

2.               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 27, 2007 |                     |
|----------------------|--------------------------|
|                 | /s/ R. Herbert  Hampton  |
|                 | R. Herbert  Hampton      |
|                 | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
Case 1:11-cv-01991-REB-KMT Document 14 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-01991-REB-KMT Document 14 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-01991-REB-KMT Document 14 Filed 10/24/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 25, 2013

N o. 04

- 13

- 00520

- CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF B.C. AS A MENTALLY ILL PERSON,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013MH2178 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After one 18

- day extension of time, Appellant's brief was due to be filed on or before September 17, 2013. Neither the brief nor a second motion for extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within 10 days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of September, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23
                                      
                                      
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated May 8, 1998, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Arctic Cat Inc. and Subsidiaries included
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arctic Cat Inc. for the year ended
March 31, 1998.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of Arctic Cat Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-37065, effective October 1, 1990, File No. 33-69916, effective October 4,
1993, and File No. 33-97244, effective September 22, 1995).



/s/Grant Thornton LLP
______________________
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 16, 1998
1

 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013,

and thus her name is substituted for that of Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. FED. R. CIV. P.

25(d)(1). By virtue of the last sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), no further action need to taken to continue

this lawsuit. 

2

 “[#23]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02478-REB

LACY A. ESTES,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1

 Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED 

MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES PURSUANT 

TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Award of Attorneys’

Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [#23],2

 filed

June 24, 2013. By her response, the Commissioner indicates that the parties have

agreed to an award of fees in the amount of $6,500.00. (See Defendant’s Response

to Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorney Fees [#24], filed July 1, 2013.) I therefore grant the

motion and award that amount of fees payable to plaintiff. See Manning v. Astrue, 510

F.3d 1246, 1249-55 (10th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 129 S.Ct. 486 (2008).

Case 1:11-cv-02478-REB Document 25 Filed 07/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 [#23], filed June 24, 2013, is GRANTED; and

2. That plaintiff is AWARDED $6,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A).

Dated July 2, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02478-REB Document 25 Filed 07/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First National Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, Harry S. Smith, President
and Chief Executive Officer of First National Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of First National Corporation.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ Harry S. Smith                   
|Date: March 27, 2009 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



85
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1347 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify the date as 

of which certain tribal land of the Lytton Rancheria of California is 

deemed to be held in trust and to provide for the conduct of certain 

activities on the land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2007 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to modify 

the date as of which certain tribal land of the Lytton 

Rancheria of California is deemed to be held in trust 

and to provide for the conduct of certain activities on 

the land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA. 

4 Section 819 of the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act 

5 (Public Law 106–568; 114 Stat. 2919) is amended— 

6 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘Notwith7 standing’’ and inserting the following: 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•S 1347 IS

1 ‘‘(a) ACCEPTANCE OF LAND.—Notwithstanding’’; 

2 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘The 

3 Secretary’’ and inserting the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) DECLARATION.—The Secretary’’; and 

5 (3) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF CLASS

8 II GAMING.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

10 notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

11 Lytton Rancheria of California may conduct activi12 ties for class II gaming (as defined in section 4 of 

13 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 

14 2703)) on the land taken into trust under this sec15 tion. 

16 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—The Lytton Rancheria of 

17 California shall not expand the exterior physical 

18 measurements of any facility on the Lytton 

19 Rancheria in use for class II gaming activities on 

20 the date of enactment of this paragraph. 

21 ‘‘(d) TREATMENT OF LAND FOR PURPOSES OF

22 CLASS III GAMING.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), for 

23 purposes of class III gaming (as defined in section 4 of 

24 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)), the 

25 land taken into trust under this section shall be treated, 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

•S 1347 IS

1 for purposes of section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regu2 latory Act (25 U.S.C. 2719), as if the land was acquired 

3 on October 9, 2003, the date on which the Secretary took 

4 the land into trust.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 4 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02491-PAB-KMT Document 4 Filed 10/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofNatrol, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date listed below, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This Certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, and shall not be deemed part of the Report or “filed” for anypurpose whatsoever, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 |                                            |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Elliott Balbert                             |   |
|                       | Elliott Balbert                                 |
|                       | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
|                       | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |

 

----