alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------
                             CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
                  Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share

Earnings (Loss) Per Share                          Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                       2001           2000
                                                    ---------     -----------
Net Earnings (Loss)                                 $  58,453     $   (97,900)
Less: Preferred Stock Dividends in Arrears               --           (39,375)
                                                    ---------     -----------

Earnings (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders   $  58,453     $  (137,275)
                                                    =========     ===========

Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     3,627,014       2,456,990
                                                    =========     ===========

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share                     $    0.02     $     (0.06)
                                                    =========     ===========


Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding     3,627,014       2,456,990

Effect of Diluted Securities:
                 Stock Options and Warrants (1)     1,748,641            --
                                                    ---------     -----------

Diluted EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding   5,375,655       2,456,990
                                                    =========     ===========

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share                   $    0.01     $     (0.06)
                                                    =========     ===========


(1) -  The Company's outstanding stock options, warrants, and convertible
       preferred staock have antidilutive effect on net loss per share for the
       three months ended March 31, 2000. As a result, such amounts have been
       excluded from the computations of diluted loss per share for that period.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ZAP (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven M. Schneider, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Steven M. Schneider
              Steven
      M. SchneiderTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
      November 13, 2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
#### Lisa Drake, Appellant, v Gregory Drake, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 712]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated March 5, 2002, which denied her motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant upon his failure to appear or answer, and granted the defendant’s cross application to compel her to accept the answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of her motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant upon his failure to appear or answer, the plaintiff failed to proffer either an affidavit of the facts or a complaint verified by a party with personal knowledge of the facts *(see*CPLR 3215 [f]; *Parratta v McAllister,*283 AD2d 625; *Fiorino v Yung Poon Yung,*281 AD2d 513; *Grainger v Wright, 214:*AD2d 549; *Finnegan v Sheahan,*269 AD2d 491). Accordingly, the motion was properly denied. We have not considered the affidavit which was improperly submitted by the plaintiff in her reply papers on the motion *(see Wright v Cetek Tech.,*289 AD2d 569; *Parratta v McAllister,*supra;*Medugno v City of Glen Cove,*279 AD2d 510).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s cross application to compel the plaintiff to accept the answer, which was untimely served *(see*CPLR 2004, 3012 [d]). Considering the absence of prejudice to the plaintiff, the meritorious nature of the defense, and the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, we agree that the delay in serving the answer should be excused *(see Calcagno v Magistrelli,*284 AD2d 289; *Kaiser v Delaney,*255 AD2d 362; *Van Man Adhesives Corp. v City of New York,*236 AD2d 465).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are improperly raised for the first time in her reply brief *(see Berkey v Emma,*291 AD2d 517; *Morgan v New York City Hous. Auth.,*255 AD2d 565). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, Gary W. Rada, President and Chief Executive Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 1, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: June 7, 2004                  
|                                     
|/s/ Gary W. Rada                     
|Gary W. Rada                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1542-000]


U.S. Gas and Electric, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

September 25, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
U.S. Gas and Electric, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is October 15, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b6d6e796864454742454e785e5b5b44595f6b4d4e5948054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c0a091e0f0322202522291f393c3c233e380c2a293e2f622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23066 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Jacques Mot, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of New
Generation Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of New Generation Holdings, Inc.




/s/
      Jacques MotJacques
      Mot
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                New
      Generation Holdings, Inc.August
      14, 2009
IV 

House Calendar No. 189 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 983 

[Report No. 110–527] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Thursday, February 14, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 983 RH 

1 2008, relating to a bill addressing foreign intelligence sur2 veillance. 

3 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legisla4 tive day of Thursday, February 14, 2008, for the Speaker 

5 to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules re6 lating to a bill addressing foreign intelligence surveillance. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS

smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 189 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 983 

[Report No. 110

–527] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules and with respect to consideration of certain resoluFEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Jacques Mot
------------------------
Jacques Mot
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.2

          I, Robert L. LaPenta, certify, that:

          (1)     I have read Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 29, 2004 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "registrant");

          (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, and results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          (4)     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

                  (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          (5)     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

                  (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Robert L. LaPenta
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

AKHNATEN CASEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1949

April 19, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, BLACK, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending January 22, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                               6
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    35
<PP&E>                                           4,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,779)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,389
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,036
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,071 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMTENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000718075
<NAME> CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,046,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,046,822
<PP&E>                                      50,178,279
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,842,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,264,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,530,931
<BONDS>                                     10,446,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,287,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,264,553
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,749,700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,312,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               345,140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,363,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,685,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,685,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,685,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.13
        

</TABLE>
---



Exhibit
  99.3

COMMENTS
  BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS
  ON CANADA-U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES



In the United
  States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory
  paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there are changes in accounting
  principles that have a material effect on the comparability of the financial
  statements, such as the changes described in Note 1 to BCE Inc.s
  consolidated financial statements or when there is a retroactive restatement
  such as that described in Note 1. Our report to the shareholders dated March
  10, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards, which
  do not require a reference to such changes in accounting principles in the auditors
  report when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed
  in the financial statements.





| |  | (signed) Deloitte
      & Touche LLP
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  |                                     
| |  | Deloitte
      & Touche LLP         





Montreal, Canada
  March 10, 2004



---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending April 7, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodREGIONS BANK                                                                                                            PWIRegions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, request for approval to make one public welfare investment.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable