alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1994: Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Q4... 92.3 44.5 47.7 .8 1.5 .2 7.1 9.6 4.9

2005: Q1... 89.3 45.0 44.3 -3.2 1.1 -7.2 5.9 8.7 3.3

 Q2... 93.5 46.2 47.3 4.7 2.7 6.6 5.1 7.7 2.7

 Q3... 96.7 47.1 49.5 3.4 2.0 4.8 5.7 7.4 4.0

 Q4... 97.5 47.6 49.9 .9 1.0 .8 5.7 6.9 4.6

2006: Q1... 96.2 48.4 47.7 -1.4 1.8 -4.4 7.7 7.6 7.7

 Q2... 101.0 49.8 51.2 5.1 2.9 7.2 8.1 7.8 8.3

 Q3... 104.2 51.1 53.0 3.1 2.5 3.6 7.8 8.4 7.1

 Q4... 105.4 52.2 53.2 1.2 2.1 .3 8.1 9.7 6.5

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Radyne ComStream Inc.:


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Radyne  ComStream  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.  333-23159)  filed as of March 12,
1997 and Form S-8 (File No.  333-67469)  filed as of November 19,  1998,  of our
report dated March 19,  1999,  except for Note 4, which is as of August 4, 1999,
on the  restated  consolidated  balance  sheet of Radyne  ComStream  Inc.  as of
December  31,  1998  and  the  related   restated   statements  of   operations,
stockholders'  capital deficiency and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1998,  which report  appears in the December  31,  1998,  annual  report on Form
10-K/A of Radyne ComStream Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
August 12, 1999
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BY:    | /s/ Steven Strasser           |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Steven Strasser               |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   | (principal executive officer) |

----
Exhibit 99.2

Certificate
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ken Huey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                 |  | October 30, 2002
|---------------- |  | ----------------
|October 30, 2002 |  |                 

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 11729 Port Road, Seabrook, TX 77586, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 26, 2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E8-2303 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02293-PAB-KLM

KEVIN JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and

DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 32] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on

May 13, 2013 it is

ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support

[Docket No. 18] is GRANTED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants

and against the plaintiff. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be

taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and

D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Case 1:11-cv-02293-PAB-KLM Document 33 Filed 05/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 15th day of May, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/ Edward Butler

Edward Butler, Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02293-PAB-KLM Document 33 Filed 05/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc. and will be retained by Streicher Mobile Fueling,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
Richard E. Gathright

Richard
E. Gathright
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 February
14, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Michael S. Shore
 Michael
S. Shore
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 February
14, 2005
 
 
 26
Exhibit 10.1.4


 


Exhibit A


 


SCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,

ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTS

AND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS


 


	
  Date
  Admitted

  	
   

  	
  Name and
  address of partners

  	
   

  	
  Value of
  non-

  cash capital

  contribution

  	
   

  	
  Partnership

  units issued

  	
   

  	
  Approx.

  Percentage

  Interests

  	
   

  	
  Federal ID
  #

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  05/22/1998

  	
   

  	
  Eagle Ridge
  Resort LLC

  37 West 57th Street, 12th Floor

  New York, NY  10019

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,198,750

  	
   

  	
  35,794

  	
   

  	
  0.46

  	
  %

  	
  52-2099405

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  02/04/1997

  	
   

  	
  GTA LP, Inc.
  14 North Adger’s Wharf Charleston, SC 29401

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  7,725,599

  	
   

  	
  99.34

  	
  %

  	
  58-2290326

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  02/04/1997

  	
   

  	
  GTA GP, Inc.
  14 North Adger’s Wharf Charleston, SC 29401

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  —

  	
   

  	
  15,554

  	
   

  	
  0.20

  	
  %

  	
  58-2290217

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Total Common OP Units

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  7,776,947

  	
   

  	
  100.00

  	
  %

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  GTA LP, Inc.

  14 North Adger’s Wharf

  Charleston, SC 29401

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000,000

  	
   

  	
  800,000

  	
   

  	
  100

  	
  %
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Richard E.              Gathright                                                                  |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                     |   |   |        |
| Richard                E. GathrightChief                Executive Officer and President May                22, 2006 |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Michael S. Shore                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Michael                S. ShoreChief                Financial Officer and Senior Vice President May                22, 2006 |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS LELAND FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement 

Agreement (Doc. 277). Defendant is ordered to file with this Court a response to that 

motion on or before Tuesday, January 21, 2013. That response should address, among 

other things, whether this Court has jurisdiction to consider Plaintiff’s motion.

Dated this 14th day of January , 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/ David M. Ebel

 

U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 278 Filed 01/14/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1874

MARIO E. CASTRO; MAGDALENA CASTRO,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; CHARLES W. SCHARF; AKERMAN LLP; 

NATSAYI MAWERE; JOSEPH DEFAZIO; NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint 

Mortgage Servicing; JACK NAVARRO; REAL TIME SOLUTIONS; ERIC C. 

GREEN; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; BRIAN MOYNIHAN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00264-MOC-DSC)

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario E. Castro, Magdalena Castro, Appellants Pro Se. Bryan G. Scott, AKERMAN LLP, 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Brian Allen Calub, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario E. Castro and Magdalena Castro seek to appeal the district court’s order 

denying their motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing their civil action. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court entered its order on July 10, 2020. The Castros filed the notice of 

appeal on August 11, 2020. Because the Castros failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-216-PB

Shirley Bruce

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

February 5, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and prepare for trial. The

government and co-defendant, Linda Lopez, do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from February 5, 2007 to May 6, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 22 Filed 01/29/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 30, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 28, 2008 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 29, 2008

cc: Peter Papps, AUSA

Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Kenneth Glidden, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 22 Filed 01/29/08 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Hildur J. Beekman-Ellner, Appellant, v Forrest Ellner, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 442]

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.), entered September 19, 2001, which sustained the father’s objection to an order of the same court (Plosky, H.E.), dated July 9, 2001, dismissing his petition for modification of his child support obligation, and terminated the father’s support obligation as of June 29, 2001.

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the parties’ child enrolled in full-time training duty at the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis and his life at Annapolis was largely controlled by the government, which also provided for the bulk of his material needs, he was clearly engaged in “active military service” to render him emancipated *(see*10 USC § 101 [d] [1]; *Zuckerman v Zuckerman,*154 AD2d 666). Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128861 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PETER VERVERIS and THERESA VERVERIS, Justices 

as Next Friend of PHILIP VERVERIS, a Minor, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 128861 

 COA: 251868 

Oakland CC: 2002-037354-NI 

HARTFIELD LANES,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. See Kenny v Kaatz 

Funeral Home, Inc, 472 Mich 929 (2005). 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

d1208 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2005 

Clerk
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
HealthDesk Corporation
Computation of Loss per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                                  ----------------------------
                                                                                 1997                       1998
                                                                                 ----                       ----
<S>                                                                   <C>                        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used for both
Basic and Diluted calculations.....................................              4,659,663                  5,564,512
                                                                       -------------------        -------------------

Net Loss...........................................................    $        (1,201,642)       $          (744,307)
                                                                       ====================       ====================

Basic loss per share...............................................    $             (0.26)       $             (0.13)
                                                                       ====================       ====================
Diluted loss per share.............................................    $             (0.26)       $             (0.13)
                                                                       ====================       ====================
</TABLE>