alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02321-RPM

KENNETH G. ROHRBACH,

KAREN L. ROHRBACH,

PAUL K. ROHRBACH, and

COMPOST EXPRESS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ELBERT COUNTY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO WAIVE DEFENDANT’S RIGHT TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

ORDER FOR STAY PENDING RULINGS IN RELATED ACTION

_____________________________________________________________________

On October 7, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on

liability. (Doc. 3). The defendant did not respond to that motion, as noted by the

plaintiffs’ notice, filed November 22, 2011. (Doc. 9). On November 22, 2011, the

defendant filed a motion to suspend briefing on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment

on liability only, because of the pending motions for class certification and for

consolidation in Onyx Properties, et al. v. Elbert County Board of County

Commissioners, 1:10-cv-01482-LTB-KLM. (Doc. 10). The plaintiff filed a response to

the motion to suspend also on November 22, 2011. (Doc. 11). 

The question presented in the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on liability

is whether the enforcement of a zoning regulation in the absence of an Official Zoning

Map constitutes a violation of the procedural due process protections of the Fourteenth

Case 1:11-cv-02321-LTB-KLM Document 12 Filed 11/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Amendment. That question is also presented in the related litigation. As noted in this

Court’s order of October 28, 2011, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss, judicial

economy and avoidance of inconsistent results warrants a stay of this action in

deference to the Onyx case and a stay was ordered until November 15, 2011, assuming

that a motion to consolidate would be filed in the Onyx case by the plaintiffs in this case. 

That motion has now been filed.

Given this state of the proceedings, it is now

ORDERED that further proceedings in this civil action, including the defendant’s

response to the motion for summary judgment as to liability only are stayed until a ruling

on the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate this action with the Onyx action. 

DATED: November 23rd, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02321-LTB-KLM Document 12 Filed 11/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT  32.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Pizza Inn, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended June 27, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and is
given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The
undersigned,  in  my  capacity  as  set  forth  below,  hereby  certifies  that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September  24,  2004          By:/s/  Ronald  W.  Parker



                                      President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                     (Principal  Executive  Officer)
                                      Director


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Annual Report of Shuffle Master, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Yoseloff, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
February 27, 2006

|/s/MARK L. YOSELOFFMark L. Yoseloff
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Case 1:11-cv-02318-LTB Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02318-LTB Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02318-LTB Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02318-LTB Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-102100, No. 333-112659, No. 333-122963, and No, 333-153706) of Integral Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries and in the related Prospectuses and in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the (i) 2002 Stock Option Plan (Nos. 333-87694 and 333-133769), (ii) 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (No. 333-150759) and (iii) Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-150761) of our reportsdated December 9, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Integral Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Integral Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries included inthis Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 25, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

December 9, 2009
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the “Report”), I, Michael W. Levin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
February 11, 2010





/s/
      Michael W. LevinMichael
      W. LevinChief
      Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00363-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. AXIS LABS, LLC., 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

Due to a scheduling conflict with a criminal trial, the Sentencing hearing set for 

Wednesday, January 18, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED. The parties shall jointly 

contact my Chambers at (303) 844-2170 to reset this hearing. 

Dated: January 11, 2012

Case 1:11-cr-00363-WYD Document 18 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Computer Central, Inc., Respondent, v City *of New*York et al., Appellants.

[745 NYS2d 480]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Department of Finance, Parking Violations Appeals Board, dated October 6, 1999, which, after a hearing, affirmed a determination of an administrative law judge finding that the petitioner had violated certain provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and imposing fines, the New York City Department of Finance, Parking Violations Bureau appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated October 16, 2000, which granted the petition and annulled the determination.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, and the judgment dated October 16, 2000, is vacated; and it is further,

Adjudged that the determination dated October 6, 1999, is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

After disposing of the points raised by the petitioner that could have terminated the proceeding within the meaning of CPLR 7804 (g), the Supreme Court should have transferred the substantial evidence question to this Court for determination *(see Matter of Duso v Kralik,*216 AD2d 297). Nonetheless, since the record is now before us, this Court will treat the issue as if it had been properly transferred here *(see Matter of Casalino Interior Demolition Corp. v State of New York Dept. of Motor Veh. Traffic Violations Bur. Appeals Bd.,*261 AD2d 615; *Matter of Christy v Department of Motor Vehs., Div. of Veh. Safety of State of N.Y.,*138 AD2d 700; CPLR 7804 [g]).

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination under review *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 240 [2] [b]; *Matter of New Rochelle Ford v Jackson,*261 AD2d 547; *Matter of Schuster v Babylon Union Free School Dist.,*138 AD2d 608). Thus, the determination must be confirmed and the proceeding dismissed *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Foothill Independent Bancorp:


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 10, 1998,
on the financial statements of Foothill Independent Bank Partners in Your Future
retirement plan as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, included as part of this Form
10-K into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Number 33-57586).



                                              /s/ Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Company
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                  VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & COMPANY
                                                  Certified Public Accountants


March 26, 1998
Rancho Cucamonga, California
#### BOTTOM v. RANK et ux.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Feb. 12, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1954.

*833Wicker, Brown- & Smith, Miami, for appellant.

Ross & Reinhardt, Miami, for appellees.

SEBRÍNG, -Justice.

Rodger Bottom, the plaintiff below, has appealed from a summary-judgment entered in favor of the defendants.

The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff, a roofing and sheet metal contractor, was engaged by the defendant, Frederick T. Rank, to “suggest Something” to remove excessive exhaust heat from the defendant’s home air conditioning units. The plaintiff went to the defendant’s home to make an inspection and Mrs. Rank indicated to him the room that housed the equipment. The plaintiff entered the room unaccompanied “to go ahead and do whatever [he] wanted.”

The air conditioning units were located approximately 7 feet above the floor. Under the units was a board extending from a niche on one side of the room to a small wooden strip nailed to a two by four stud on the other side.' The board was loose at both ends and merely rested in the niche, on one side, and on the wooden strip, on the other.

Bottom, who was thoroughly familiar with scaffolding, inspected and tested the board and satisfied himself that it was strong and secure enough to carry his weight. He then stepped up- on the board and stood there taking measurements. While he was standing there, the wooden strip gave way and plaintiff fell to the floor and was injured.

The question is whether upon these undisputed facts, there existed any genuine material issue as to the negligence of the defendants to be submitted to a jury.

It is plain from the record that the injuries to the plaintiff did not stem from the violation of any legal duty owed iby the defendants to the plaintiff. The plaintiff entered the room by himself and selected and pursued his own methods for accomplishing the task of planning and measuring for the installation of equipment. After inspecting and" testing the board the plaintiff on his own volition and without suggestion from anyone decided to make use of the board to. reach the air conditioning units, instead of using some safer method. Merely because the plaintiff elected to use the facilities of the defendants instead of his own, the pláintiff cannot in the absence of an agreement cast the burden of the consequences of his' acts upon the defendants. “One having a choice between methods of doing an act which are equally aváilable/who chooses the more dangerous of the methods, is ordinarily deemed negligent, in the absence of a showing of the existence of' kn emergency, sudden peril, or other cifc'unistatice justifying such choice.” 38 Am.Jur., Negligence, section 192.

This, cas.e is clearly distinguishable on the, facts from Hall v. Holland, Fla., 47 So.2d 889. ‘ ■ .

Under the facts revealed by the record there existed no genuine issue, of any material fact to' be determined by a jury. Consequently the judgment appealed from should" be affirmed. Williams v. City of Lake City, Fla., 62 So.2d 732.'

It is so ordered.,

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00371-CR

IN RE ROY LEE BOYKIN

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 24, 2018

[OT06]

 

1

In light of our disposition, all pending motions are dismissed as moot.
In re Boykin Page 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Edy Francis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 29, 2014





/s/ EDY FRANCIS


EDY FRANCIS


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO REGISTRANT AND WILL BE RETAINED BY REGISTRANT AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Case 1:02-cr-00537-CMA Document 26 Filed 01/26/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 949 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 949

 Recognizing and commending the 100th Anniversary of the Augusta Metro 
                          Chamber of Commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

 Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, and 
 Mr. Barrow) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing and commending the 100th Anniversary of the Augusta Metro 
                          Chamber of Commerce.

Whereas the Augusta Metro Chamber of Commerce is building a stronger and better 
        community in Augusta, Georgia by working with the businesses, merchants, 
        and industry to advance the civic, economic, industrial, professional, 
        and cultural life of Augusta;
Whereas the Augusta Metro Chamber of Commerce jointly represents the voices of 
        small and large businesses alike to promote a pro-business environment 
        by serving as its advocate, promoting the region, enhancing the business 
        climate, and providing quality membership programs and services;
Whereas the Augusta Metro Chamber of Commerce and its members provide citizens 
        with a strong business environment that increases employment, retail 
        trade and commerce, and industrial growth in order to make Augusta a 
        better place to live;
Whereas the Augusta Metro Chamber of Commerce has worked to promote a prosperous 
        future for all Augustans through legislative efforts and through events 
        such as the annual Legislative Breakfast, the Women in Business 
        luncheons, the Economic Club Speaker Series, and through programs such 
        as Drugs Don't Work and Leadership Augusta; and
Whereas with credit to the efforts and leadership of the chamber of commerce, 
        Augusta is home to excellent housing, schools, health care, and 
        shopping;
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the leaders and members of the Augusta Metro 
        Chamber of Commerce for their 100 years of dedicated service to 
        Augusta's economic development;
            (2) commends their efforts to ensure Augusta's continued 
        competitiveness in our domestic and global economies; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 
        transmit an appropriate copy of this resolution to the Augusta 
        Metro Chamber of Commerce, Walter Dukes, Chairman Don Bailey, 
        Chairman Elect Sue Parr, and President and Augusta Mayor Deke 
        Copenhaver.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-6 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of Amercia

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-30-01,02,03,04-PB

Danielle Rhodes,

Enrique Rosario,

Elvis Delarosa and

Victor Caceres

O R D E R

Defendant Elvis Delarosa, through counsel, has moved to continue the May 6,

2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for a continuance as the discovery has

just begun and he now requires additional time to prepare for trial. The government

and counsel for co-defendants do not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties additional time to

properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from May 6, 2008 to July

8, 2008. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served in granting

Case 1:08-cr-00030-PB Document 28 Filed 04/04/08 Page 1 of 2
2

a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

The April 24, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to June 26, 2008 at

3:45 PM.

SO ORDERED.

April 4, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

James Gleason, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Esq.

Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.

Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Case 1:08-cr-00030-PB Document 28 Filed 04/04/08 Page 2 of 2