alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
      Michael S. Shore, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Streicher Mobile Fueling,
      Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5.
      The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
      All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)
      Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
      February 14, 2006





/s/
      Michael S.
      Shore


Michael
      S. Shore


Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





37
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than October 31, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Trust Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana, to indirectly 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Globe Bancorp, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire Globe Homestead Savings Bank, FSA, both of 
Metairie, Louisiana, and thereby engage in operating a savings 
association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E8-23519 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Jacques Mot
                                            --------------------------
                                        Jacques Mot
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        August 14, 2006
**Exhibit 99.5**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-12130 on Form F-3, No. 333-12780 and 333-12802 on Form S-8 and No. 333-213603 on Form F-10 and to the use of our reports dated March 2, 2017, relating to the consolidated financial statements of BCE Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of BCE Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016.

/s/ Deloitte LLP[1] 

March 8, 2017 Montréal, Canada

----

1 CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A104630
#### Roger Cajuste, Plaintiff, *v.*Budget Credit, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

April 2, 1957.

*Henry Conan Caron*for Roger Cajuste, petitioner.

*Samuel Presser*for Budget Credit, Inc., respondent.

Benjamin Brenner, J.

This application is made pursuant to section 47-e. of the Personal Property Law for an order vacating and canceling of record a wage assignment purportedly executed by the petitioner on October 3, 1956, subsequently assigned to the respondent on October 5, 1956, and recorded^ in the office of the County Clerk, Kings County, on January 14,, 1957.

Respondent’s answering affidavit contains no evidentiary ' facts regarding events occurring prior to October 5, 1956, and the only recorded document is the assignment of wages bearing a further assignment to the respondent.

. The assignment of wages fails to meet the requirements imposed thereon by statute for it fails to state the “ place at which payments are to be made,” as required by section 46-c of the statute *(Matter of Lott,*49 N. Y. S. 2d 134, 137).

Petitioner also alleges that neither a copy of the wage assignment nor any other .document upon which the respondent relies herein was ever delivered to him at any time. There is no evidence of such delivery and respondent merely relies upon the formal acknowledgment of receipt contained in the assign*949ment forms which, in my view, do not constitute proof of the clear act of 1 ‘ delivery ’ ’ contemplated by section 46-e of the Personal Property Law *(Bailey*v. *Upstate Loan Co.,*205 Misc. 535, 537).

While respondent is a holder in due course of the promissory note alleged to have been executed by petitioner, it is also an assignee of the wage assignment agreement. As such it is subject to any defenses or infirmities which may exist in connection with the wage agreement. In enforcing its alleged rights as such assignee of the wage contract the respondent has no greater rights than the original assignee.

The order to show cause specifies that the application is made ‘ ‘ on the grounds that said wage assignment was procured by fraud and that in *form*and in the *manner*in which it was acquired, there was a failure to comply with the applicable law.” (Emphasis supplied.) The fraud alleged goes to the substance of the sale transaction which cannot be passed upon on an application of this character. As I have had occasion to observe when “ lack of consideration ” was urged as grounds for a similar application in *Witherspoon*v. *Mullins & Sons*(N. Y. L. J., March 1, 1957, p. 9, col. 4), until a contract is vitiated or avoided in a plenary suit, it must be regarded as subsisting and any wage assignment based thereon may not be questioned on the ground of fraud. As indicated, however, the *‘1*form ’ ’ was defective in that the place of payment was omitted and, as to the “manner” in which the assignment was obtained, its delivery to the wage assignor when executed is essential *(Bailey*v. *Upstate Loan Co., supra).*

Application granted. Settle order on notice.
H. Res. 86

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 24, 2007.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 78) amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to the Congress to cast 

votes in the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 

the Union. The resolution shall be considered as read. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution and on any amendment thereto to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question 

except: (1) one hour of debate on the resolution equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Rules; (2) the amendment 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Kirk of 

Illinois or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the 

question, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 
2

•HRES 86 EH 

debatable for 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit which may not contain instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H. Res. 78 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

resolution to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. EG08-75-000; EG08-76-000; FC08-6-000; FC08-7-000; FC08-8-000; FC08-9-000] 

Take notice that during the month of August 2008, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations 18 CFR 366.7(a). 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-23212 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.2 AWARENESS LETTER 

 

December 9, 2005 

 

Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. 

2727 Diehl Road 

Naperville, Illinois 60563 

 

We have made a review, in accordance withthe standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary for the three-month and nine-month periods endedOctober 29, 2005 and October 30, 2004, as indicated in our report dated December 9, 2005; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedOctober 29, 2005, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-92248, 333-98549, and 333-108222 on Form S-8. 

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statementprepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

 

30
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2007: Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

 Q4... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.2

2009: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.1

 Q2... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.1

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2007: Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 6.9 7.2 6.8

2009: Q1... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.8

 Q2... 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q3... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.9

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2007: Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q4... 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.9

2009: Q1... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q2... 6.9 6.6 6.6 6.9

 Q3... 6.7 6.4 6.7 7.1
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.0 6.7

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.6

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2007: Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 7.0 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.8 6.9

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.2 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.1

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Banyan Corporation - Exhibit 10.9






 Exhibit 10.9 

 Stock Option Agreement 


THIS AGREEMENT made as of August 10th, 2003.



B E T W E E N:



  
    
      
        
          
             Banyan Corporation, of an Oregon Company with offices in
              the City of Los Angeles, California 

             (“Banyan”) 

          

        

      

    

  




- and -



  
    
      
        
          
             Michael J. Gelmon, Businessman, of the
              City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta, Canada 

             (the “Optionee”) 

          

        

      

    

  




WHEREAS:


	(A)	Banyan is desirous in granting the Optionee an option to
      purchase 1,000,000 common shares in Banyan (the “Optioned Shares”)
      pursuant to the terms and conditions as set out herein; and
	 	 
	(B)	The Optionee wishes to accept from Banyan, the option to
      purchase the Optioned Shares pursuant to the terms and conditions as set
      out herein;


 NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the
  premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
  of which is hereby acknowledged, Banyan hereby grants to the Optionee an option
  (the “Option”) to purchase the Optioned Shares at a purchase price
  (the “Purchase Price”) of 18 cents per share , upon and subject to
  the following terms and conditions: 

	•	Option Exercise Period. The Option may be exercised by the
      Optionee in whole or in part at any time from the date hereof for a period
      of 5 years and shall terminate 5 years from the date hereof unless exercised
      by the Optionee prior thereto.
	 	 
	•	Exercise of Option. The Optionee shall, for the purposes
      of exercising the Option, give to Banyan notice in writing thereof (the
      “Notice”), accompanied by acceptable payment to Banyan in the
      amount of the Purchase Price.







 

	•	Non-Assignability of Option. The Option is personal to the
      Optionee. Accordingly, the Optionee may not sell, assign or otherwise transfer
      the Option or any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written
      consent Banyan, which consent may be unreasonably or arbitrarily withheld.
	 	 
	•	Entire Agreement. This Agreement expresses the entire agreement
      between the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and supersedes
      all previous agreements, whether written or oral, between the parties respecting
      the subject matter hereof.
	 	 
	•	Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding
      upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators
      and successors and permitted assigns.
	 	 
	•	Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed
      in accordance with the laws of the State of Oregon.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
  as of the date first above written. 

	  	BANYAN CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	
      /s/ Banyan Corporation
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
      Michael Gelmon
	 	 	Michael Gelmon
#### In the Matter of William O’Gorman et al., Petitioners, against Joseph Schechter et al., Constituting the Department of Personnel and Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 31, 1957.

*130
      *Samuel Resnicoff*for petitioners.

*Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation*Counsel, for respondents.

Aron Steuer, J.

Petitioners are clerks and accountants in the welfare department. Recently positions in the department have been reclassified pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Estimate providing for the so-called Career and Salary Plan. This means that certain positions have been given new titles, higher salaries, greater responsibility and as a consequence more prestige. The new positions have been filled from the ranks of the former grade 5 clerks. The changes were not uniform — that is, some former grade 5 clerks became administrative assistants, others senior administrative assistants, others administrators and so on. These positions carried different pay, duties and responsibility. Like changes were made as to accountants.

No examination of any kind except as hereinafter described was held. All of the employees involved were given questionnaires which had to do chiefly with the work they were then doing. On the basis of the answers the new positions were made and presumably filled. That this constituted promotion no one seriously disputes.

The recent decision of Mr. Justice Gold in *Matter of Mandle*v. *Brown*(5 Misc 2d 115) involved the same plan of reclassification as promulgated by the resolution but in a different department. What was said there applies with equal force and little can be added to any purpose. The merit system or civil service is solidly fixed in our Constitution and may not be by-passed even with the best intentions. Whether or not the present instance involves an ingenious scheme to return in a modified degree to the spoils systems is not necessary to consider, The plain mandate of the law requires that these positions *131be filled by competitive examination and not otherwise. The only exception is where examination would not be practicable. No showing that it would not was made and the attempt to do so was so feeble as not to warrant discussion.

The motion is granted. Settle order.
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
_______________________________________________________________________________ 

The Board of Directors 
Peoples First Corporation: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-28301 on Form S-3 and No.  33-28304 on Form S-8 of Peoples First Corporation
of our report dated January 26, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Peoples First Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and
1994, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stock-
holders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1995, which reports appears in the December 31, 1995 annual
report on Form 10-K of Peoples First Corporation. 


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 

St. Louis, Missouri 
March 20, 1996
No. 72-1094.

#### Estelle, Corrections Director *v.*Sanchez.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.