alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

56447 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 189 

Monday, September 29, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8293 

Gold Star Mother’s Day, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Throughout our history, the men and women of the Armed Forces have 

put our Nation’s security before their own, doing their duty in the face 

of grave danger. On Gold Star Mother’s Day, we pay solemn tribute to 

the mothers of the patriots lost serving this great Nation. 

Gold Star Mothers inspire our Nation with their deep devotion to family 

and country. These extraordinary women serve their communities, dedicate 

their time to helping members of our Armed Forces and veterans, and 

bring comfort and hope to families whose loved ones laid down their lives 

in the defense of our liberty. Nothing can compensate for their sacrifice 

and loss, yet Gold Star Mothers demonstrate tremendous courage and resolve 

while working to preserve the memory and legacy of all our fallen heroes. 

On this day, we honor our country’s Gold Star Mothers and remember 

their sons’ and daughters’ noble service and great sacrifice. We offer them 

our deepest gratitude and our most profound respect, and we ask for God’s 

blessings to be upon them and their families. 

The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 115 of June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 

1895 as amended), has designated the last Sunday in September as ‘‘Gold 

Star Mother’s Day’’ and has authorized and requested the President to issue 

a proclamation in its observance. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 28, 2008, as Gold Star 

Mother’s Day. I call upon all Government officials to display the flag of 

the United States over Government buildings on this special day. I also 

encourage the American people to display the flag and hold appropriate 

ceremonies as a public expression of our Nation’s sympathy and respect 

for our Gold Star Mothers. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES5
56448 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth 

day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of 

the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and 

thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E8–22945 

Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William F. Smith, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 618]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 1, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a sales representative after violating the employer’s policy prohibiting employees from sending inappropriate communications by e-mail. Evidence presented at the administrative hearing disclosed that claimant sent the first questionable e-mail to his coemployees to notify them of a meeting. The title of the e-mail *804included the words, “nude pictures nude pictures.” Claimant subsequently testified that he had used these words as a means of gaining the attention of his readers. He was nonetheless advised by his supervisor that this language violated the employer’s policy against sexual harassment and the misuse of electronic communications. He was given notice that a repeat of such inappropriate conduct would be severely sanctioned. Approximately 11 months later, claimant was fired after he sent an e-mail to his coemployees which contained a list of “Top Ten” sayings at second jobs, one of which was, “Another table dance?”

It is well settled that a claimant’s knowing violation of an employer’s established policy or workplace rules may constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see, Matter of Campbell [Commissioner of Labor],*271 AD2d 787, 788; *Matter of Rothman [Sweeney],*242 AD2d 818). In the instant matter, claimant acknowledged that he had received a copy of the employer’s handbook, which set forth its proscription against sexually harassing conduct and the inappropriate use of electronic communications. Claimant’s supervisor testified that he had warned claimant, after he sent out the first objectionable e-mail, that the sending of inappropriate e-mail would not be tolerated. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances *(see, Matter of Hassenfratz [Sweeney],*242 AD2d 815). Claimant’s assertion that he received no warning from his supervisor after sending the first e-mail raised an issue of credibility for resolution by the Board *(see, Matter of Campbell [Commissioner of Labor], supra*at 788).*

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

*

 The settlement agreement between the employer and claimant, submitted by claimant with his appellate brief, is not part of the record on appeal and was not considered in the course of this Court’s review (see, CPLR 5528 [a] [5]).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEILER
POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,188,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,395,344
<PP&E>                                         356,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,564,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,642,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,115
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,148,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,564,154
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,524,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,556,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,556,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00364-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. RAMON ACOSTA-BALLESTEROS, 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

Due to a scheduling conflict with the Court’s calendar, the Change of Plea hearing 

set for Friday, December 9, 2011 is VACATED and RESET for Wednesday, December 

14, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. 

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents 

separately to Judge Daniel’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later 

than 72 HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted, 

the hearing will be VACATED. There will be no exceptions to this policy, and 

sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply.

 Dated: December 8, 2011
|   (1)   | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: October 26, 2011 | By:/s/ Steven S. Sintros      Steven S. Sintros, Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58685-58686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0173; Form SF 3102]


Proposed Information Collection; Request for Comments on a 
Revised Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised 
information collection. This information collection, ``Designation of 
Beneficiary (FERS)'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0173; form SF 3102), is used 
by an employee or an annuitant covered under the Federal Employees 
Retirement System to designate a beneficiary to receive any lump sum 
due in the event of his/her death.
    Comments are particularly invited on whether this collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the 
Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical 
utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection 
is accurate and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and ways in 
which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond through use of the appropriate technological 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Approximately 2,893 SF 3102 forms are completed annually. Each form 
will take approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual estimated 
burden is 723 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Margaret A. Miller by 
telephone at (202) 606-2699, by FAX (202) 418-3251, or by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2d604c5f4a4c5f48590360444141485f6d425d40034a425b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ad7fbe8fdfbe8ffeeb4d7f3f6f6ffe8daf5eaf7b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include a mailing address with your 
request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days of the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Ronald W. Melton, Deputy 
Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement 
and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW.--Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.

For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact: 

[[Page 58686]]

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW.--Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Howard Weizmann,
Deputy Director.
 [FR Doc. E8-23609 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending March 31, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBENCHMARK COMMUNITY BANK                                                                                                PremisesBenchmark Community Bank, Kenbridge, Virginia, for an increase in its investment in bank premisesNewspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableBNC BANCORP                                                                                                             * 3A5BNC Bancorp, High Point, North Carolina, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of KeySource Financial, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, and thereby indirectly acquire KeySource Commercial Bank, Durham, North Carolina.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/16/2012CFG COMMUNITY BANK                                                                                                      * BranchCFG Community Bank, Towson, Maryland, to establish a branch at 11 W. Ridgely Road, Lutherville, MarylandNewspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableHARVEST BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                   CICU.S. Immigration Investment Center, LLC, Washington, D.C., and Ms. Mahnaz Khazen, as its managing director, to acquire up to 24.9% of the voting securities of HarVest Bancorp, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/10/2012HOMETRUST BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                              * SLHC FormationHomeTrust Bancshares, Inc., Clyde, North Carolina, to become a savings and loan holding company upon the conversion of HomeTrust Bank, Clyde, North Carolina, from a mutual to stock form of ownership.Newspaper: 04/04/2012Federal Register: 04/19/2012MAINSTREET BANK                                                                                                         * BranchMain Street Bank, Herndon, Virginia, to establish a branch at 727 Elden Street, Herndon, VirginiaNewspaper: 04/06/2012Federal Register: Not applicableMORGANTON FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION                                                                          MemberMorganton Savings Bank, S.S.B., Morganton, North Carolina, to become a state member bank upon the charter conversion of Morganton Federal Savings and Loan Association.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ALI SHAHROKHI; AND TODD 

MATTHEW PHILLIPS, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

AARON D. FORD, NEVADA 

ATTORNEY GENERAL; STEVEN 

SHEVORSKI, NEVADA ATTORNEY 

GENERAL DEPUTY; AND SABRENA 

CLINTON, NEVADA ATTORNEY 

GENERAL DEPUTY, 

Res • ondents. 

No. 83973 

FILED 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order 

disqualifying the attorney general from representing a district court judge 

in federal litigation. Having considered the petition and its supporting 

documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and 

discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party 

seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); 

Srnith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 

851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and 

2

.7, S.S o 0 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1)47A <110011114 
.4(14C4-41 , J. 

Stiglich 

that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a 

writ petition). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

cc: Ali Shahrokhi 

Todd Matthew Phillips 

Attorney General/Carson City 

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the 

decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,257,809<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,483,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,741,586
<PP&E>                                       1,661,993<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,380,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,403,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,896,926
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         9,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,497,216<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,403,579
<SALES>                                     10,770,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,770,661
<CGS>                                        9,171,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,171,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,061,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                576,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                   195,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   380,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $71,537 Prepaid Expenses; 60,719 Deferred Income Taxes
<F2>Property & Equipment net of amoritization of $426,248 equals $288,624;
Software Development costs, net of accumulated amortization of $954,302
equals 1,373,219; $150 miscellaneous deposits.
<F3>Includes $696,437 Additional paid-in capital and $4,800,779 Retained
 Earnings.
</FN>

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02389-WYD-MJW

JOHN STAUFFER,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

KAREN E. HAYES, D.O.;

A WOMAN’S PLACE OF FORT COLLINS, P.L.L.P.;

PETER DUSBABEK;

TODD VRIESMAN;

MONTGOMERY, KOLODNY, AMATUZIO & DUSBABEK, L.L.P.;

J. BRADFORD MARCH III; and

MARCH, OLIVE & PHARRIS, L.L.P.,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Christine Skorberg’s Unopposed Motion

to Appear by Telephone at Scheduling Conference, DN 70, filed with the Court on

March 28, 2012, is GRANTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants Karen E. Hayes, D.O. and a

Woman’s Place of Fort Collins, P.L.L.P.’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear at

April 2, 2012 Scheduling Conference Via Telephone, DN 68, filed with the Court on

March 27, 2012, is GRANTED.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that both counsel shall arrange a joint conference call

to the court and contact the court as the final connection by calling (303) 844-2403. 

Date: March 28, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02389-WYD-MJW Document 72 Filed 03/28/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-28-000]


City of Pasadena, CA; Notice of Filing

December 31, 2007.
    Take notice that on December 21, 2007, the City of Pasadena, 
California, filed its third annual revision to its Transmission Revenue 
Balancing Account Adjustment, to become effective January 1, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d5b584f5e5273717473784e686d6d726f695d7b786f7e337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f292a3d2c20010306010a3c1a1f1f001d1b2f090a1d0c41080019">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-230 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>