alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AGREEMENT

This Agreement is made as of the 23rd of November, 1999, ("The
Effective Date") by Rogel Patawaran, individually and
collectively known as, Rogel Technologies with address at 1861 S.
Bundy Dr., Los Angeles, CA  90025 ("Hereinafter referred to as
`RT'") and Mr. Tom Hughes, individually and collectively known
as, eConnect and or SafeTpay with address as 2500 Via Cabrillo
("Hereinafter referred to as `ECNC'").

The parties hereby represent and warrant that the individuals
executing this Agreement on their behalf are authorized to do so
and will bind the parties to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.

1.01  It is agreed that an "outstanding balance" in the amount of One
Hundred and Sixty Eight Thousand dollars (USD$168,000.00) exists
payable to RT for which ECNC is responsible to pay under the
terms of the previously signed Payment Schedule dated October 23,
1999.

2.01  In consideration of the item mentioned herein in Paragraph 1.01,
ECNC agrees that the MRS and or SafeTpay software, which was
designed and created by RT, remain under the owndership and full
control of RT.  However, RT agrees to allow ECNC to utilize its
software, and provide instruction to SafeTpay for the Merchant
Plug-in integration so that SafeTpay may sign on new Merchants
(for the purpose of moving monies across the Internet for a
transaction fee).

3.01  For the service provided to ECNC and SafeTpay by RT, ECNC agrees
to pay fees to RT as follows:

a.  A non-refundable fee of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) upon the
signing of this Agreement.

b.  The hourly rate of Four Hundred Fifty dollars ($450.00)
per hour, per Programmer for any additional work, instruction or advice.

4.01  ECNC agrees that the payments mentioned in Paragraph 3.01 above,
Does Not satisfy the "outstanding balance" mentioned in Paragraph
1.01 and said Payment Schedule dated October 23rd, 1999 will
still remain effect until completely and fully satisfied.

IN THE WITNESS WHEREOF, Both Parties have executed this Agreement
on the date first written above.

Agreed and Accepted:


By: /s/  Rogel Patawaran                    By: /s/  Tom Hughes
Rogel Patawaran, President                  Tom Hughes, CEO
Rogel Technologies                          eConnect
Date:  November 23, 1999                    Date:  November 23, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1110 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 248
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1110

                          [Report No. 110-115]

 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to provide for the conjunctive use of surface and ground water in 
                           Juab County, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2007

Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Bennett) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             June 28, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to provide for the conjunctive use of surface and ground water in 
                           Juab County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Juab County Surface and Ground Water 
Study and Development Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CONJUNCTIVE USE OF SURFACE AND GROUND WATER, CENTRAL UTAH 
              PROJECT.

    Section 202(a)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4609) is amended 
by inserting ``Juab,'' after ``Davis,''.
                                                       Calendar No. 248

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1110

                          [Report No. 110-115]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to provide for the conjunctive use of surface and ground water in 
                           Juab County, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 28, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
Case 1:11-cv-01977-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01977-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01977-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01977-LTB Document 7 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Miscellaneous Case No. 11-cv-01960-LTB-BNB

In re Application of 

CANTOR FITZGERALD EUROPE and 

CANTOR FITZGERALD (HONG KONG) 

CAPITAL MARKETS LIMITED for an Order 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 To Conduct Discovery 

for Use in a Foreign Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal Without

Prejudice (Doc 15 - filed November 30, 2011), and the Court being fully advised in the

premises, it is therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each

party to pay their own fees and costs. 

 BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: December 1, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-01960-LTB Document 16 Filed 12/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Harry L. Peck, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 31831.)

Court of Claims,

April 29, 1957.

*797
      *Morrell R. Southwick*and *James M. Cerio*for claimant.

*Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney-General (Donald A. Marshall*and *Harold S. Coyne*of counsel), for defendant.

Richard S. Heller, J.

The claimant was the owner on April 24, 1952 of approximately 144 acres of land located in the town of Van Burén, Onondaga County, New York, on which were situated a farmhouse, barn and out buildings, all of which were in a poor state of repair and without modern facilities. None of the buildings were included in the taking by the Thruway Authority.

The Thruway Authority on April 24, 1952 appropriated 9.227 acres of land (see map for description) belonging to claimant by filing a copy of the appropriation map with the County Clerk of Onondaga County. Personal service was made on February 19, 1953 and the claim was filed with the Clerk of the Court of Claims on April 8, 1953.

Prior to the appropriation the claimant’s land was divided by what is known as the Brick Yard Road with 80 acres south and 64 acres north of the road. By the appropriation the State has divided the southern portion again and has left 38 acres of land without access.

In addition to the 9.227 acres appropriated and the 38 landlocked acres, the claimant has lost a valuable water supply. New fencing will be needed if he is to use his land for farming purposes and the value of the farm has been diminished by eliminating the acreage from the total.

It is the opinion of the court that the fair and reasonable market value of claimant’s land prior to the appropriation was $18,400 and that the fair and reasonable market value after the appropriation was $13,130.

Claimant has been damaged in the sum of $5,270 and is entitled to judgment in that amount with interest from April 24, 1952 to the date of entry of judgment.

The above includes all damage, actual, consequential and possible restriction of the use of lands for billboards or allied purposes.

The best available use of the land was for farming.

The claim has not been assigned.

The court has viewed the premises.

Submit findings.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

806 KA 12-00385 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., SCONIERS, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
KEVIN C. ANDREWS, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN ANDREWS, ALSO KNOWN AS KEVIN CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered February 21, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: June 28, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01943-BNB

RODNEY RAY ZIMMERMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOANN SHOEMAKER, 

CATHIE HOLST, 

MR. BURGONDO, 

DEEANN KAHLER, and 

JOSEPH WRIGHT, 

Defendants. 

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

On October 12, 2011, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for Inclusion in

Legal Access Program" (Doc. No. 13). The request is DENIED. 

However, Plaintiff will be allowed twenty (20) days from the date of this

minute order in which to file an amended complaint that complies with the August 24,

2011, order. Failure to do so within the time allowed will result in the dismissal of the

instant action. No further extensions will be granted.

Dated: October 21, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-01943-BNB Document 14 Filed 10/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending December 11, 2021

----

Supervision and Regulation            Risk Management -- Federal Reserve letter reiterating supervisory expectations for large banks' risk management with investment funds, in light of the Archegos Capital Management default.            -Announced, December 10, 2021            Enforcement            Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Dallas, Texas -- consent order of prohibition against Brent J. Huisman, a former institution-affiliated party.            -Announced, December 9, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGate
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Zugay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (Section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    MICHAEL
ZUGAY                 
|                                     
|Michael Zugay Chief Financial Officer



May 10, 2004



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to iGate Corporation and will be retained by
iGate Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
58162 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–23337 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–26] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCAIDBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–26 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58163 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.033</GPH>
58164 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.034</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58165 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.035</GPH>
58166 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.036</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58167 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.037</GPH>
58168 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICESEN06OC08.038</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58169 

[FR Doc. E8–23344 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–36] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(l) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCAIDBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–36 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: September 25, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne Page, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 193]

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered December 3, 1999, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered December 3, 1999, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 35/97.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

The defendant claims that a statement made by the victim naming him as one of the perpetrators should not have been admitted into evidence. We disagree. The statement, which was made a few minutes after the victim had been shot and sustained serious injury, was properly admitted under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule *(see People v Brown,*70 NY2d 513).

Additionally, the prosecutor’s untimely disclosure of the victim’s videotaped statement does not require reversal. Where there is a delay in providing *Rosario*material *(see People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286, *cert denied*368 US 866), a defendant is not entitled to reversal of the judgment of conviction unless there is a showing that he or she has been “substantially prejudiced” *428by the late delivery *(see People v Best,*186 AD2d 141). Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate that he suffered any prejudice from the People’s tardy disclosure. The material was discovered during the cross-examination of the relevant witness, and defense counsel was permitted to stop his cross-examination of that witness and continue it after reviewing the *Rosario*material.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of GULF ONSHORE, INC. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August
14, 2008





/s/
Earl Moore





Name:
Earl Moore


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer











Dated:  August
14, 2008





/s/ Mark
Smith





Name:
Mark Smith


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
Case 1:11-cv-02378-REB Document 8 Filed 11/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, October 3, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Staff Assistant.
 [FR Doc. E8-23421 Filed 9-30-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul Perez GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-40891.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

*402Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

The lawyer appointed to represent Raul Gonzalez has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gonzalez has filed no response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 877 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 18, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 6) to move the United States toward 
greater energy independence and security, to increase the production of clean 
renewable fuels, to protect consumers, to increase the efficiency of products, 
buildings, and vehicles, to promote research on and deploy greenhouse gas 
capture and storage options, and to improve the energy performance of the 
Federal Government, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment to the 
House amendment to the Senate amendment to the text, and to consider in the 
House, without intervention of any point of order except those arising under 
clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion offered by the Majority Leader or his designee 
that the House concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the 
motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or 
their designees. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to final adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of the motion to concur pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the motion to such time as may be 
designated by the Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  On the first legislative day of the second session of the One 
Hundred Tenth Congress, the House shall not conduct organizational or 
legislative business.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```