alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED May 21, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE,

AT JACKSON

_______________________________________________________ ) NANCY KNIGHT, ) Carroll County Chancery Court ) No. 97-DR-215 Plaintiff/Appellee. ) ) VS. ) C.A. No. 02A01-9804-CH-00094 ) HENRY KNIGHT , ) ) Defendant/Appe

llant. ) )

______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

The opinion and judgment of this Court filed on March 18, 1999 are withdrawn.

____________________________________ FARMER

, J.

____________________________________ CRAWFORD, P.J.,W.S.

____________________________________ LIL LARD, J.
Dee Properties, LLC.



Good Buddy's Coffee Express, Inc.
7 Richmond Lane
Blythewood, SC 29016


Dear Mr. Massey:

We have reviewed your business plan and have decided that if
you will meet the following requirements we will be able to assist
you with the formation of your properties and the growth of Good
Buddy's Coffee Express.

We are presently able to offer you a three year lease
agreement starting 6 months after you have opened the first site.
We will honor a six month delay in your lease term and will
separately negotiate an amount both parties feel appropriate in a
share transaction of the company.  The lease will be on a property
your company finds suitable but will not exceed $35,000 to develop.
We look forward to hearing from you if this arrangement will
meet your requirements.

Sincerely,




/s/ Phillips Dee
-----------------

Phillips Dee
Owner
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.7.1


                The First Amendment to the Employment Agreement


This First Amendment dated January 24, 1997 is made between Madison River
Telephone Company, LLC ("Holdings") and Donald K. Roberton, ("Executive")
pursuant to paragraph 11 of the Employment Agreement between Holdings and
Executive dated August 1, 1996 ("Employment Agreement").

1.   The beginning of Section 3.4 of the Employment Agreement shall be amended
     by adding the following:

          3.4  Expenses. "Executive is authorized to incur reasonable expenses
               --------
          in carrying out his duties and responsibilities on behalf of the
          Company under this Agreement, including, without limitation, expenses
          for travel and similar items related to such responsibilities which
          are consistent with Holdings' policies in effect from time to time
          with respect to travel and other business expenses. Holdings will
          reimburse Executive for all such expenses upon presentation by
          Executive from time to time of an itemized account of such
          expenditures; provided that such expenses are in compliance with any
          other Holdings' policies in effect from time to time with respect to
          reporting and documentation of such expenses; it being understood,
          furthermore, that the cost of commuting between Executive's residence
          and Holdings' principal place of business shall not be reimbursed."

2.   Section 7.0 is amended to reflect the new address for Executive:

          Donald K. Roberton


All other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and
effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and Holdings have caused this First Amendment to
the Employment Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above.


                                        Madison River Telephone Company, LLC


                                        by:  /s/ J. STEPHEN VANDERWOUDE
                                             --------------------------


                                                 DONALD K. ROBERTON
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Executive
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23461]



[[Page 58291]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., License No. 09/79-0454; 
Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 
160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee 
under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the 
Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought 
an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt 
security financing to InQ, Inc., 30501 Agoura Road, Suite 203, Agoura 
Hills, CA 91301.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and 
Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., both Associates of Emergence 
Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own in the aggregate more than ten percent 
of InQ, Inc. Therefore this transaction is considered a financing of an 
Associate requiring prior SBA approval.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20416.

    Dated: September 22, 2008.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. E8-23461 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB and Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

      Date as of August 15, 2005
                                      By       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Kenneth I. Denos
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02291-REB-MJW

VERNE JAY MERRELL,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DAVID ALLRED, D.O. FCC Health Services, and

PATRICIA MITCHELL, Program Mgt [sic] Officer, Health Services,

in their individual and professional capacities,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike or in the Alternative for

Leave to File Surreply (docket no. 42) is GRANTED for the following reasons. The Pro

Se Incarcerated Plaintiff’s Response [Surreply] (docket no. 40) is STRICKEN. 

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado Local Rules of

Practice effective December 1, 2011, do not contemplate surreplies. Further,

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 C states, in pertinent part, “...[N]othing in this rule precludes a

judicial officer from ruling on a motion at any time after it is filed.” Pro Se litigants must

“comply with the fundamental requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil and Appellate

Procedure.” Odgen v. San Juan County, 32 F.3d 452, 455 (10th Cir. 1994); Hickey

v. (NFN) Van Austin et al., 1999 CJC.AR 5979. The fact that a party is appearing pro

se does not relieve that individual from the obligation of complying with all applicable

rules of the court. Colorado v. Carter, 678 F. Supp. 1484, 1490 (D. Colo. 1986); Hall

v. Doering, 997 F. Supp. 1464, 1468 (D. Kan. 1998); Nielson v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276,

1277 (10th Cir. 1994) (pro se plaintiffs are held to the same rules of procedure which

apply to other litigants). It is not the proper function of the district court to assume the

role of advocate for the pro se litigant. Gibson v. City of Cripple Creek, 48 F 3d 1231,

(10th Cir. 1995). 

Date: April 5, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02291-REB-MJW Document 44 Filed 04/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT  32.2




Certificate
Pursuant to Section 906


of
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002


CERTIFICATION
OF CFO




In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Bovie Medical Corporation. (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the“Report”), the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
November 30, 2009




/s/ Gary D. PickettGary D. PickettChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in the Registration Statements and Prospectus on Form S-8
dated December 30, 1994, of Shuffle Master, Inc. of our report dated December
13, 1995, on the financial statements of Shuffle Master, Inc. for the years
ended October 31, 1995 and 1994, incorporated by reference in the Registration
Statements, and to the use of our name and the statements with respect to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.



Minneapolis, Minnesota                  /s/ BLANSKI PETER KRONLAGE & ZOCH, P.A.
January 24, 1997                        BLANSKI PETER KRONLAGE & ZOCH, P.A.
EXHIBIT 

33 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 16 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
-1- 

006157-11 428660 V1

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 

COLORADO 

Court Address: Denver City and County Building 

 1437 Bannock St. 

 Denver, Colorado 80202 

Plaintiff: United Western Bank 

v. 

Defendant(s): Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al. ▲ COURT USE ONLY ▲

Case No.: 2010CV3325 

Division: 2 

Attorneys for Plaintiff United Western Bank 

Kip B. Shuman (#23593) 

Rusty E. Glenn (#39183) 

THE SHUMAN LAW FIRM 

885 Arapahoe Avenue 

Boulder, Colorado 80302 

Telephone: (303) 861-3003 

Facsimile: (303) 484-4886 

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) 

Tyler Weaver (pro hac vice) 

Karl P. Barth (pro hac vice) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Telephone: (206) 623-7292 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE 

APPROVED

 

 

Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on 

any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and 

file a certificate of service with the Court 

within 10 days. 

Dated: Mar 09, 2011 

William W. Hood III 

District Court Judge 

DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT

 

EFILED Document 

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD 

Filing Date: Mar 9 2011 3:17PM MST 

Filing ID: 36381431 

Review Clerk: Nancy E Magdaleno

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 16 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
-2- 

006157-11 428660 V1

The Court, having considered Counsel’s Unopposed Request for a Stay to Allow for 

Resolution of Issues Created by Seizure of Plaintiff United Western Bank, hereby stays all 

proceedings in this case until May 3, 2011. 

Dated: March ___, 2011. BY THE COURT 

 

_____________________________ 

 William W. Hood III 

 Denver District Court Judge 

 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 16 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Radyne Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of Radyne Corporation on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-23159,333-67469, 333-90383, 333-41704, 333-89316, 333-145319, and 333-145018) and Form S-3 (No. 333-113900) of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Radyne Corporation and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, and to the reference to our firm in Item 6, *Selected Financial Data*, which reports and reference appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-Kof Radyne Corporation. 

Our reports on Radyne Corporation’s consolidated financial statements refer to a change in the method of accounting for uncertainty inincome taxes in 2007 and a change in the method of accounting for share-based employee compensation in 2006. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Phoenix, Arizona 

March 14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            5068
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1300
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2634
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      40416
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           12343
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             12266
<LOANS>                                          59573
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  124435
<DEPOSITS>                                      108180
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                560
<LONG-TERM>                                       3260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         13227
<OTHER-SE>                                       (792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  124435
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   6437
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 3415
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9981
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3258
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6723
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (50)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3841
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2611
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.96
<LOANS-NON>                                        299
<LOANS-PAST>                                        26
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   833
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2282
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1525
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      219
<RECOVERIES>                                        51
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1417
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1417
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 213 filed 02/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 213 filed 02/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 213 filed 02/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Isramco, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Haim Tsuff, Chief Executive and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



MARCH 30, 2005                          /s/ HAIM TSUFF
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            HAIM TSUFF
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                            (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
ISRAMCO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY ISRAMCO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.


                                       -2-
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending August 10, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending December 1, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF THE JAMES                                                                                                       * BranchBank of the James, Lynchburg, Virginia, to establish a branch at 45 South Main Street, Lexington, Virginia.Newspaper: 12/06/2018Federal Register: Not applicableUNION BANKSHARES CORPORATION                                                                                            * 3A5
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-2665WA

_____________

Dennis Joslin, CPA, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Jack D. Beavert, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: July 22, 1997

Filed: August 4, 1997

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Joslin appeals from the adverse decisions of the jury and the judge in

Joslin's diversity action to collect the unpaid balance on a note. We reverse.

Through a series of transactions, Joslin obtained a promissory note guaranteed

by Jack D. Beavert from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Later, Joslin sued

Beavert for the unpaid principal balance and accrued interest as a guarantor on the note.

Over Joslin's objections, the district court instructed the jury that the debtor's obligation

could be discharged to the extent the creditor impaired the value of the collateral,
-2-

unless waiver applied, and that the creditor was required to dispose of collateral in a

commercially reasonable manner. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Beavert.

Applying Texas law to the guaranty signed by Beavert, we conclude the defense

of impairment of collateral was unavailable to Beavert. When Beavert consented to

remain liable regardless of any impairment of collateral, and gave the creditor the right

to ignore the collateral and obtain a judgment against the guarantor, the impairment-ofcollateral defense was expressly waived. See Simpson v. MBank Dallas, N.A., 724

S.W.2d 102, 106 (Tex. Ct. App. 1987); FDIC v. Coleman, 795 S.W.2d 706, 707-10

(Tex. 1990). Additionally, Beavert's guaranty unambiguously waived any defense

relative to the commercially reasonable disposition of the collateral. See Steinberg v.

Cinema N'Drafthouse Sys., Inc., 28 F.3d 23, 24, 25-26 (5th Cir. 1994).

Because the district court misinstructed the jury and the error "caused, or can be

reasonably calculated to have caused, the rendition of an improper verdict," Lone Star

Ford, Inc. v. McCormick, 838 S.W.2d 734, 739 (Tex. Ct. App. 1992), we reverse and

remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.