alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted), the undersigned, Charles J. Drake, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.






DATED:April 15, 2011

/S/ Charles J. DrakeCharles J. DrakeChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          -  [Project No. 4306-017—Minnesota] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations (18 CFR Part 380), the Office of Energy Projects has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) regarding the City of Hastings' (City's) request to install two hydrokinetic turbines at the Mississippi Lock and Dam No. 2 Hydroelectric Project. The project is located on the Mississippi River in Dakota County, Minnesota. This EA concludes that the Proposed Action, with staff's recommended mitigation measures, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 

                    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference Room of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC. The EA also may be viewed on the Commission's Internet Web site (                    *www.ferc.gov*) using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number “P-4306”                           ( print page 57347)                        in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance with eLibrary, contact                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or call toll-free at (866) 208-3372, or for TTY contact (202) 502-8659.                 

                    For further information regarding this notice, please contact Andrea Claros at (202) 502-8171 or by e-mail at                     *andrea.claros@ferc.gov.*

 Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E8-23215 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
(July 9, 2002)

#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; William C. Behrndt III, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 908]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1993, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as *655required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Her cure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2006...... 75.3 56.9 68.0 70.4 84.1 91.8 68.7 66.1 65.5 79.8 2007...... 69.6 62.0 62.0 63.5 68.8 88.1 64.3 63.3 66.1 72.0 2008...... 75.9 69.0 71.2 72.1 59.2 90.2 66.2 63.3 68.7 79.7 2005: Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Q2... 75.9 68.7 69.8 66.0 85.6 90.8 68.8 64.4 70.3 79.4  Q3... 78.3 43.0 64.3 81.2 78.5 96.6 76.9 72.9 62.9 83.5  Q4... 76.6 62.7 67.4 74.9 91.4 87.1 65.4 62.3 65.3 82.9 2007: Q1... 64.6 71.8 68.1 55.8 50.0 87.4 62.6 64.9 70.9 62.9  Q2... 71.4 55.6 75.2 65.5 70.8 90.0 63.9 65.3 71.3 73.3  Q3... 74.8 41.5 75.5 71.7 70.2 89.8 66.2 64.0 61.1 82.8  Q4... 69.1 65.5 43.5 64.6 77.1 86.1 64.6 59.1 61.3 73.1 2008: Q1... 68.7 71.7 48.9 62.6 47.5 91.4 56.9 53.5 64.3 71.5  Q2... 74.7 70.5 56.6 72.5 69.0 86.7 65.2 68.7 71.2 76.9  Q3... 82.1 57.8 81.5 82.6 54.6 91.3 70.2 63.9 70.8 87.7  Q4... 79.4 70.4 86.3 73.8 58.9 91.2 71.7 66.9 68.4 84.5 2009: Q1... 61.1 63.8 83.6 52.8 45.6 89.4 71.9 69.4 64.7 59.4  Q2... 77.8 49.0 84.1 77.2 39.6 94.5 68.8 71.4 70.4 82.2  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                        |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.
|                        | 
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  | /s/    TAKEO K.
SASAKI    
|                        |  | Takeo K. Sasaki           
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
                             This schedule contains summary financial informa-
                             tion extracted from Form 10-QSB for the period
                             ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
                             entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                         481
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               765
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    11,958
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        16,333
<ALLOWANCE>                                    290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,143
<DEPOSITS>                                     26,677
<SHORT-TERM>                                   700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            311
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 31,143
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                727
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              372
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,129
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             619
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             648
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          481
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (7)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                37
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.94
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               290
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nicholaus Samora

v. Civil No. 07-cv-079-PB

Angela Poulin, et al.

O R D E R

 Plaintiff has filed a “Witness Request List” and

“Supplemental Witness Request List” which appear an effort to

comply with LR 45.2. While the rule permits issuance of

subpoenas there is no waiver of witness fees and this plaintiff

is without funds to pay them. The Attorney General has complied

with reasonable requests to produce witnesses in the past. 

Poulin, Fortier, Cox and Blaisdell are defendants and are

alleged to have directly denied plaintiff’s constitutional

rights. They should be present. The issue isn’t why Kench

responds for the Commissioner so he is not necessary. Starr is

not essential to the alleged denial of plaintiff’s rights. 

The “requests” (document nos. 11 and 12) are granted as to 

Case 1:07-cv-00079-JM Document 13 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Poulin, Fortier, Cox and Blaisdell and otherwise denied. The

Clerk is ordered to provide the subpoenas for those four people. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 29, 2007

cc: Nicholaus Samora, pro se

 Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00079-JM Document 13 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23





BERRY . DUNN . MCNEIL & PARKER


BDMP





CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM














We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community Bancorp. of our report dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2009 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community Bancorp.





We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-127024) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-133631) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated March 29, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated therein by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.








/s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker





Portland, Maine


March 29, 2010


Vermont Registration No. 92-0000278
EXHIBIT 32.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, Gary W. Rada, President and Chief Executive Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet
Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 13, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary W. Rada                     
|Gary W. Rada                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer



29
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Monroe G. Milstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Monroe G. Milstein
Monroe G. Milstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 27, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: City of Houston v. Kimberley R. Trimmer-Davis

Appellate case number: 01-19-00088-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-11410

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

The unopposed motion to reset oral argument is granted. Oral argument in this case will 

be reset from September 25, 2019 to October 2, 2019. Please refer to the court’s amended notice 

of submission for further details. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelley

Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 10, 2019
174 La. 823

#### REED v. EUREKA HOMESTEAD SOC.

No. 31397.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 1932.

Marion C. Seeber, of New Orleans (Joseph Rosenberg, of New Orleans, of counsel), for appellant.

McCloskey & Benedict, of New Orleans, for appellee.

*848LAND, X

Plaintiff alleges that she subscribed to 40 shares of running stock in the Eureka Homestead Society; that defendant society issued to plaintiff a certain hook m which all deposits were entered of moneys paid by plaintiff to the society; that plaintiff made deposits at various intervals, hut that the society had a dishonest person in its employ, who made false entries of withdrawals in the book; and that plaintiff “has calculated that she should have on deposit in said Eureka Homestead Society an amount estimated at $2,318.90 and compound interest accumulated thereon; that said book shows a balance of $517.44.”

Plaintiff prays for judgment in the sum of $2,318.90, “together with all compound interest accrued thereon,” or in such amount as the court may determine to be proper, after a true and accurate accounting.

The Eureka Homestead Society, in its answer, alleges that plaintiff deposited and withdrew at different times various and sundry amounts, as shown by her passbook; that plaintiff’s father had a deposit with the society of $978.35, which had been transferred to plaintiff’s book or account; and that plaintiff and her father, each with the knowledge of the other, withdrew various amounts from plaintiff’s passbook, until only a credit balance of $517.44 was left; and “that this is the just and accurate amount due and owing to plaintiff.”

Considering the allegations of the petition, and the admissions of the answer, it is clear that the only amount in dispute is the difference between $2,318.90, demanded by plaintiff in her petition, and the sum of $517.44, admitted by defendant society in its answer to be due plaintiff, or the sum of $1,801.46.

We have appellate jurisdiction only when the amount in dispute, or the fund to be distributed, shall exceed $2,000 exclusive of interest. Const. 1921, art. 7, § 10.

Reference was made in oral argument to dividends due by defendant society; but plaintiff has not claimed such dividends, either by allegation in her petition, or in her prayer for judgment. Manifestly, the claim of plaintiff in her petition for “compound interest” cannot be allowed to increase the amount demanded by plaintiff so as to confer appellate jurisdiction upon this court in this particular case.

It is therefore ordered that this case be transferred to the Court of Appeal for the parish of Orleans, within thirty days from the date when the decree herein shall have become final, and, in default thereof, that this appeal be dismissed.

It is further ordered that plaintiff (appellant) pay the costs of this appeal.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Review of AIDS and Alcohol-Related Grant Applications.                     

*Date:*                         December 4, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3039, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural Project Review Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3039, Rockville, MD 20852 301-443-9737,                         *bautista@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E8-23051 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01761-RPM

CARLOS BASSATT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and PATRICK

SANCHEZ,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

The last words in the complex administrative process under the Colorado Civil

Rights Act was the Colorado Court of Appeals unpublished Order issued October 20,

2011, vacating the order of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission and remanding the

case to it”to reconsider the issue of whether the School District’s termination of Bassatt

constituted discriminatory retaliation under state law.”

The plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment based on either res judicata

or collateral estoppel is unfounded given that there is no final decision. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied.

DATED: July 30, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01761-RPM Document 50 Filed 07/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1