alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
First Amendment to the Sublease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Sublease Agreement (the “Amendment”), which is dated for reference purposes only on
November 28, 2000, is to that certain Sublease Agreement with an Effective Date of December 1, 2000 (the “Sublease”), in effect by and between InsWeb Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Sublessor”) and Leap Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (“Sublessee”), concerning that certain real property situated in the City of Redwood City, County of San Mateo, State of California, consisting of approximately thirty-two thousand four hundred fifty (32,450) square
feet of space (the “Sublet Space”) on the first and fourth floors in that building known as 901 Marshall Street, Redwood City, California (the “Building”), as more particularly described in the Sublease. All capitalized terms not
otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Sublease. This Amendment shall amend and modify the terms and conditions of the Sublease, and, to the extent that any of the terms and conditions of this Amendment
conflict with the terms and conditions set forth in the Sublease, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall control. Except as amended herein, the Sublease shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties amend the Sublease as follows: 
  
 1. Section 8 of the Sublease is amended in part by adding the following words to the end of the first full paragraph in Section 8: “,
which shall be amortized over the term of the sub-sublease or assignment, as appropriate.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above. 
  

									
	 SUBLESSOR
  
 INSWEB CORPORATION
 a Delaware corporation
	 	 	 	 SUBLESSEE
  
 LEAP CORPORATION
 a Delaware corporation

					
	By:	 	/s/    [illegible]	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    [illegible]
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

					
	Its:	 	Chief Technology Officer	 	 	 	Its:	 	(none)
#### The State, ex rel. Sweeney, *v.*Michell et al., Council of City of Cleveland.

(No. 24405

— Decided April 25, 1934.)

*Mr. James P. Mooney, Mr. Sylvester V. McMahon, Mr. Fred W. Zimmerman, Mr. Joseph B. Keenan*and *Mr. Herbert R. Guyler,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. George Kerr, Mr. Ezra Z. Shapiro,*directors of law, *Mr. Alfred Glum, Mr. William G. Dixon*and *Mr. John Smith,*for defendants in error.

*267It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of *Ohio River Power Co.*v. *City of Steubenville,*99 Ohio St., 421.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Stephenson and Zimmerman, JJ., dissent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-64,038] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on September 12, 2008, in response to a worker petition filed by former workers of Phoenix Leather, Inc., Brockton, Massachusetts. 

The petition was only filed by two workers, which does not meet the requirement of three workers necessary to file a petition. As a result, the petition regarding the investigation has been deemed invalid. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 2008. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8-23303 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Manuel Freitas, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 454]

Appeal by the de*421fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullin, J.), rendered January 22, 2001, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21

A.G. EDWARDS, INC.

REGISTRANTS
SUBSIDIARIES

The
following listing includes the registrants directly-owned subsidiaries and
indirectly-owned subsidiaries (certain subsidiaries that are not significant are
omitted from the listing), all of which are included in the consolidated
financial statements:

|                                          |  | State of             |              |                                
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | ------------ | -------------------------------
|                                          |  | Incorporation/       |              |                                
|Name of
      Company                     |  |                      | Organization |                                
|A.G.
      Edwards & Sons, Inc.           |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     
|A.G. Edwards Technology Group,
      Inc. |  | Missouri             |              | A.G.
      Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|A.G.
      Edwards Hedging Services, Inc. |  | Nevada               |              | Registrant                     
|A.G.
      Edwards Trust Company FSB      |  | Federal Charter      |              | Registrant                     
|A.G.E.
      Properties, Inc.             |  | Missouri             |              | Registrant                     
|AGE
      Investments, Inc.               |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     
|Beaumont Insurance Company                |  | Vermont              |              | AGE
      Investments, Inc.    
|A.G.
      Edwards Capital, Inc.          |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     
|AGE
      Capital Holding, Inc.           |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     
|AGE
      International, Inc.             |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     
|A.G. Edwards & Sons (UK)
      Limited    |  | United
      Kingdom |              | AGE
      International, Inc.  
|Gallatin Asset Management, Inc.           |  | Delaware             |              | Registrant                     

---
Exhibit 3(ii)

The following two amendments to the Amended and Restated Articles of Association of Community Bancorp. were adopted by the requisite vote of the shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 2, 2000 and became effective on May 12, 2000, upon filing in the Office of the Vermont Secretary of State:

Article Eleven is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

ARTICLE ELEVEN

INDEMNIFICATION

The Board of Directors is authorized to adopt such By-laws and other regulations or arrangements (including contracts) providing for indemnification of, and advancement of expenses to, any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, as the Directors may deem advisable, to the extent not inconsistent with applicable law.

Article Sixteen is added, reading in its entirety as follows:

ARTICLE SIXTEEN

LIMITATION OF DIRECTOR LIABILITY

A Director of the Corporation shall have no personal liability to the Corporation or to its shareholders for money damages for any action taken, or any failure to take any action, solely as a director, based on a failure to discharge his or her own duties in accordance with Section 8.30 of Title 11A of the Vermont Statutes Annotated, except for (a) the amount of a financial benefit received by the Director to which the Director is not entitled; (b) an intentional reckless infliction of harm on the Corporation or its shareholders; (c) a violation of Section 8.33 of Title 11A of the Vermont Statutes Annotated; or (d) an intentional or reckless criminal act. This Article Sixteen shall not be deemed to eliminate or limit the liability of a Director for any act or omission occurring prior to the date this Article becomes effective. No amendment or repeal of this Article Sixteen shall apply to or have any effect on the liability or alleged liability of any Director of the Corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such Director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.
---





Exhibit
  99.32

CERTIFICATION
  OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND OF THE
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IN ACCORDANCE WITH 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
  accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of
  the undersigned officers of BCE Inc. (the Company), does hereby
  certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

the
  Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the Company
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 40-F fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
  of the Company.





|Dated:
      April 14, 2004 | By: | (signed)Michael
      J. Sabia                                   
|--------------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |     |                                                                  
|                            |     | Michael
      J. SabiaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer



|Dated:
      April 14, 2004 | By: | (signed)Siim
      A. Vanaselja                     
|--------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                            |     |                                                     
|                            |     | Siim
      A. VanaseljaChief
      Financial Officer

This
  certification accompanies the Form 40-F filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  and is not deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Shawn M. Murphy

v. Civil No. 08-cv-34-PB

United States of America, et al.

O R D E R

Shawn Murphy asserts that he has sued Stephen J. Langs only

in his official capacity. Accordingly, Langs’ challenge to the

sufficiency of service on Langs in his individual capacity is

moot. Langs’ arguments that the court lacks personal and subject

matter jurisdiction over the claims against him, and his argument

that the complaint fails to state a viable claim for relief, have

not been sufficiently developed to permit their resolution by the

court. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is denied without

prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 7, 2008

cc: Robert A. Shaines, Esq.

Carol L. Shea, Esq.

Martha Van Oot, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00034-PB Document 15 Filed 05/07/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02282-MSK-BNB

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

FARRELL & SELDIN, a Colorado partnership;

BARRY A. SELDIN;

THOMAS F. FARRELL;

THOMAS F. FARRELL, P.C.; and

BARRY A. SELDIN, P.C., as general partners,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.
DATED this 22nd day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending September 2, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCASTLE CREEK CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P.                                                                                 * 3A1
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-8 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
the Report.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Stephen P.
Marsh


Stephen
P. Marsh, President & Chief Executive Officer





March 26,
2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKEN, Education Department,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

 

It is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Show Cause Pursuant to 28

USC § 1915 (Docket No. 183) is granted. Plaintiff need not make a filing fee payment

for the month of December 2012.

Date: December 13, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 185 Filed 12/13/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Order entered April 14, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00375-CV

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E.P., Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MED-20-80112

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 10, 2020 motion to extend time to file 

his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than 

April 30, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2303]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 11729 Port Road, Seabrook, TX 
77586, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d3d2c09edcd1d2d8c1f0d4d8c39ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503332207e3c31323821103438237e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 26, 
2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
September 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-2303 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THOMAS HEARREAN

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 338

- C R

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 5

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# F

- 2012

- 1033

- E )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s Motion to Transfer Exhibit to the Court of Appeals.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the Official Court Reporter for the County Criminal Court

No. 5 of Denton County, Texas, to electronically submit a supplemental reporter’s record with

State’s Exhibit 1 which is an audio/video r ecord ing . The supplemental reporter’s record is due

with this Court on or before July 25 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25 th day of J une , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00049-CV

____________________

KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant

V.

KERRY L. THOMAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-197,566

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Kansas City Southern Railway Company, filed a motion to 

dismiss this accelerated appeal because the claims against the appellant have been 

non-suited. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of 

this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice of appeal. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
2

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

 

Submitted on March 1, 2017

Opinion Delivered March 2, 2017

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Cosmo Communications Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carol
Atkinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Cosmo Communications Corporation and will be retained by Cosmo Communications
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request


/S/
      Carol AtkinsonCarol
      Atkinson
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)Date:
      February 26, 2009
<PAGE>
 
                                                          Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11



                  Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
              Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                For the Periods


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   July 1, 1997         January 1, 1997
                                      through               through
                                September 30, 1997     September 30, 1997
                                ------------------     ------------------
                                   (unaudited)             (unaudited)
 
<S>                             <C>                    <C>
Net Income                         $   22,015                $  8,326
                                   ==========                ========
 
Weighted Average Number of          1,988,626                 835,911
                                   ==========                ========
Common Shares Outstanding
 
Earnings per Common Share          $      .01                $    .01
                                   ==========                ========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Scott Kimball

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00154-JL

Bonk Air Transport, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

August 1, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 10) is approved as

submitted, although counsel for both parties view settlement as

highly likely, and intend to engage in informal, expedited

discovery to attempt an early settlement.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 1, 2008

cc: David P. Slawsky, Esq.

Karyn P. Forbes, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00154-JL Document 11 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 1