alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7558-7559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Consumer Advisory Council

ACTION: Notice of Meeting of the Consumer Advisory Council

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Consumer Advisory Council will meet on Thursday, March 6, 2008. 
The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will take place 
at the Federal Reserve Board's offices in Washington, D.C., in Dining 
Room E on the Terrace Level of the Martin Building. Anyone planning to 
attend the meeting should, for security purposes, register no later 
than Tuesday, March 4, by completing the form found online at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/secure/forms/cacregistration.cfm
    Additionally, attendees must present photo identification to enter 
the building.
    The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and is expected to conclude at 
1:00 p.m. The Martin Building is located on C Street, NW, between 20th 
and 21st Streets.
    The Council's function is to advise the Board on the exercise of 
the Board's

[[Page 7559]]

responsibilities under various consumer financial services laws and on 
other matters on which the Board seeks its advice. Time permitting, the 
Council will discuss the following topics:
    <bullet> Proposed rules for residential mortgage transactions
    Members will discuss the Board's proposal to establish new 
regulatory protections for consumers in the residential mortgage market 
through amendments to Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in 
Lending Act and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act. The 
proposal addresses unfair, abusive, or deceptive lending and servicing 
practices and mortgage advertising practices, and would also require 
creditors to provide consumers with transaction-specific cost 
disclosures earlier.
    <bullet> Foreclosure issues
    Members will discuss issues related to home foreclosures, such as 
loss-mitigation strategies and counseling initiatives.
    Reports by committees and other matters initiated by Council 
members also may be discussed.
    Persons wishing to submit views to the Council on any of the above 
topics may do so by sending written statements to Jennifer Kerslake, 
Secretary of the Consumer Advisory Council, Division of Consumer and 
Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, D.C. 20551. Information about this meeting may be obtained 
from Ms. Kerslake, 202-452-6470.
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 5, 2008.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks
Associate Secretary of the Board
[FR Doc. E8-2335 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2




              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.








May 1, 2006                                 /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                            Vice President and Chief Financial
                                            Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>           5

<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential Acquisition Fund I, L.P.
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000717319
<NAME>              Prudential Acquisition Fund I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1995

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1995

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1995

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          750,153

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   440,214

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,190,367

<PP&E>                          44,188,324

<DEPRECIATION>                  17,417,828

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  27,960,863

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           531,950

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      27,428,913

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    27,960,863

<SALES>                         3,195,694

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,195,694

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,538,854

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (343,160)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (8.32)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,098
<PP&E>                                         319,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                (111,878)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   235,918
<SALES>                                         21,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,225
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,361)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                       540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,874
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB

DANIEL LEROY RHODEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD, COLORADO,

KEVIN PALETTA, in His Official and Individual Capacity,

RYAN O’HAYRE, in His Official and Individual Capacity, and

STUART RUYBAL, in His Official and Individual Capacity,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 11, filed 11/17/2011]; and

(2) Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. # 31, filed 2/15/2012] (the “Motion

to Amend”).

The plaintiff has shown cause for his failure to serve the Complaint within the time

allowed. In addition, the Motion to Amend is unopposed and amendment would serve the ends

of justice.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 11] is DISCHARGED; and

(2) The Motion to Amend [Doc. # 31] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is

directed to accept for filing the First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 30]. 

Case 1:11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB Document 34 Filed 02/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated February 21, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB Document 34 Filed 02/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00704-CV

Rhett Webster Pease, Appellant

v.

Texas Attorney General, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 12,380, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Rhett Webster Pease has filed a notice of appeal from an “Order for

Issuance of Capias” issued by the trial court on July 27, 2007. Appellant’s notice of appeal is

untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after the order appealed from was signed by the

trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. In addition, appellant appeals from an interlocutory order, not

a final judgment.

This Court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal from an interlocutory order unless

jurisdiction is specifically provided by statute. See Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53

(Tex. 1998); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992). No statute

authorizes an interlocutory appeal from an order for issuance of capias. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.

Code Ann. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2007) (providing for appeal from certain interlocutory orders).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
2

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 8, 2008
209 La. 455

#### STATE v. REYNOLDS.

No. 38023.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 10, 1945.

Joseph Rosenberg, of New Orleans, for de f endant-ap pellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., Michael E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James P. O’Connor, Jr., Dist. Atty., James G. Coul-ton, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Sam Monk Zel-den, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

FOURNET, Justice.

The accused Robert Reynolds, having neither reserved a bill of exceptions nor filed motions for a new trial or in arrest of judgment in the lower court, is prosecuting this appeal from his conviction and sentence on a bill of information charging him with aggravated battery under Article 34 of the Louisiana Criminal Code, contending that a beer bottle, the weapon named in the information, is not a dangerous weapon within the meaning of the article of the Criminal Code and that he is entitled to have- us review this matter under the provisions of Article 557 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.

Article 557 can have no application here since the defendant is not attempting to have the judgment set aside or a new trial granted on the ground of misdirection of the jury, improper admission or rejection of evidence, or as to' error of any matter of pleading or procedure. In any event, his contention is not well taken for, as was pointed out in the very recent case of State v. Johnston, 207 La. 161, 20 So. 2d 741, a dangerous weapon under the codal definition is not necessarily one that can or will produce death or great bodily harm, but, rather, an instrumentality that, because of the manner in which it is used, is likely to produce death or great bodily harm.

However, a mere examination of the information reveals that it is fatally defective in that it fails to name the per*819son upon whom the battery was committed, as specifically required by Articles 230 and 235 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by Acts 147 of 1942 and 223 of 1944.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence of the accused are set aside and he is discharged.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00533

- CR

MARY GRIGSBY
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 09

- 363

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

a ppeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
November 8, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-04-PB

Carmen Morales

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for June 2, 2009 citing the need for additional

time to negotiate a plea agreement or prepare for trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 2, 2009 to August 18, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00004-PB Document 15 Filed 05/28/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The court will hold a final pretrial conference on July 20,

2009 at 2:30 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 28, 2009

cc: Charles J. Keefe, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00004-PB Document 15 Filed 05/28/09 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZAP (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated:  November 14, 2012 By: /s/ Alex Wang
 Alex Wang
 Co-Chief Executive Officer
 (Co-Principal Executive Officer).
 
 Dated:  November 14, 2012 By: /s/ Charles Schillings
 Charles Schillings
 Co-Chief Executive Officer
 (Co-Principal Executive Officer).
 
 
 Dated: November 14 By: /s/ Benjamin Zhu
 Benjamin Zhu
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Louis Bender, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

December 20, 1956.

*Elfers & Trebing*for trustees, petitioners.

' *Merle I. St. John,*special guardian of Ronald Dennis, infant, respondent.

George Frankenthaler, S.

The special guardian’s first objection to the trustees’ account is disposed of as follows: the trustees are directed to establish a special fund in the *705sum of $337.50, representing attorneys’ fees and disbursements which they conceded at the hearing were improperly deducted from the corpus in which the infant has a contingent interest. This fund is to be maintained until it can be determined whether the infant’s future interest will vest in possession and thus entitle him to possession of the fund. Objections numbered 2 and 3 have been withdrawn. Objection number 4, which concerns the size of the attorneys’ fee, was withdrawn pursuant to a stipulation that the sum in question represents compensation for all legal services through the entry of the decree in the instant proceeding, which includes trustees’ resignations and accounts and a substitution of trustees. The claim for reimbursement of disbursements, other than fees for the service of citation and filing fees, has been waived. The fee of the attorney-trustee is allowed in the amount requested.

The special guardian requests a construction of the provisions in the will governing this trust which he contends require payment from income of all of the expenses of this accounting proceeding.

Item Six of the will defines the *“ net*” income distributable to the beneficiaries as the balance of income remaining after the payment of **1*all proper expenses for administering the trust and all taxes of any kind properly payable upon or in respect to the trust or the income therefrom and all proper and necessary expense or disbursement for the maintenance or care of the principal or corpus of the trust.” Legal fees and other expenses incurred as a result of the judicial settlement of the trust account, necessitated by the death of a beneficiary and trustees’ resignations, are not clearly within the categories of charges which the testator apportioned to income, and in the absence of an unambiguous expression of intention the court cannot construe this will as directing a deviation from the applicable equitable rules governing the allocation of expenses between principal and income.

Upon the submission of Edith L. Dennis’ resignation as a cotrustee, to which she agreed in the course of the hearing, and the filing of a supplemental affidavit bringing the account down to date, a decree may be submitted on notice or consent settling the account, approving the resignation of the individual cotrustees and appointing the Bank of New York as sole successor trustee.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


 Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending September 
19, 2008

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0287.
    Date Filed: September 18, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC2 Within Middle East Expedited Resolution 002ca (Memo 
0188); Intended effective date: 1 January 2009.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0288.
    Date Filed: September 18, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Africa-TC3 (except South West Pacific) , 
Resolution 015v (Memo 0389) , Intended effective date: 15 October 2008.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0289.
    Date Filed: September 18, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Africa-South East Asia Expedited, Resolution 
002bw (Memo 0390), Intended effective date: 15 October 2008.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0290.
    Date Filed: September 18, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Middle East-TC3 (except South West Pacific), 
Resolution 015v (Memo 0391), Intended effective date: 15 October 2008.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0291.
    Date Filed: September 18, 2008.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC23/123 Middle East-South East Asia Expedited, Resolution 
002hh (Memo 0392), Intended effective date: 15 October 2008.

 Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operation, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E8-23407 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### Stanislaw Dzieran, Respondent, v 1800 Boston Road, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[808 NYS2d 36]

*337Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann BrigantiHughes, J.), entered May 2, 2005, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant 1800 Boston Road, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it and granted plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 (6) claims, and order, same court and Justice, entered August 10, 2005, which, upon reargument, adhered to the court’s original determination, unanimously modified, on the law, the award of partial summary judgment to plaintiff on his Labor Law § 241 (6) claim vacated and defendant’s summary judgment motion granted insofar as to dismiss the section 241 (6) claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, while working without safety devices, fell approximately 10 feet off a platform that was being constructed for storage purposes. The court properly granted plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against defendant-appellant, the owner of the building undergoing renovation, since the lack of safety devices was a proximate cause of the accident and ensuing injuries *(see John v Baharestani,*281 AD2d 114 [2001]). No triable issue of fact is presented as to whether plaintiff was appellant’s special employee. Although appellant and plaintiff’s employer were managed by the same individual, the record discloses no evidence that plaintiffs employer transferred control over plaintiff to appellant *(see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp.,*78 NY2d 553 [1991]).

There is, however, merit to appellant’s contention that plaintiffs Labor Law § 241 (6) claim should have been dismissed. Plaintiffs reliance on alleged violations of 12 NYCRR 23-1.15, 23-1.16 and 23-1.17 is misplaced. Those sections, which set standards for safety railings, safety belts and life nets, respectively, do not apply because plaintiff was not provided with any such safety devices *(see D'Acunti v New York City School Constr.*
      *338
      *Auth.,*300 AD2d 107, 108 [2002]). 12 NYCRR 23-1.22 (c) is inapplicable because the platforms contemplated by that section are “those used to transport vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic” *(Curley v Gateway Communications,*250 AD2d 888, 892 [1998]), and plaintiff was not working on such a platform. Nor was there a violation of section 23-1.7 (b) since plaintiffs fall was less than 15 feet (12 NYCRR 23-1.7 [b] [1] [iii] [a]).

We have considered appellant’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.