alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00362-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. DALE JOHNSON, 

2. DONALD BEVERLY, 

3. RONALD BENJAMIN, 

4. JIMMY HUTCHINSON, 

5. VINCENT JACKSON, 

6. JERROLD MINNEY, and 

7. SCOTT GOLDBERG, 

Defendants. 

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure that all 

pre-trial phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is 

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by Friday, December 2, 2011,

and responses to these motions shall be filed by Monday, December 12, 2011. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall request hearing on all pending motions, 

if necessary, and final trial preparation conference at a future date. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that a 12-day jury trial is set for Monday, January 9, 

2012 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002.

Case 1:11-cr-00362-WYD Document 32 Filed 11/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

Dated: November 3, 2011 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL 

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cr-00362-WYD Document 32 Filed 11/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Masino *v.*The State of Ohio. Wood *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24958

— Decided October 24, 1934.)

*Mr. A. J. BiancM,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Arthur L. Sidwell,*city solicitor, *Mr. B. B. Watters,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. I. 8. Ballard,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the rea*643son no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Lucky, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 424]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered on or about November 3, 1999, and judgment of resentence, same court and Justice, rendered on or about August 2, 2001, unanimously affirmed. The unpublished order of this Court entered herein on June 6, 2002 is hereby recalled and vacated. No opinion. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.2(t)

July 14, 2004

Mr. GM O'Connell
Chairman
Modem Media, Inc.
230 East Avenue
Norwalk, CT 06855

Dear GM:

This letter agreement is intended to clarify the terms of your consulting
agreement with Modem Media, Inc. (the "Company") dated November 18, 2003.

For the avoidance of doubt, all stock options listed on Exhibit A hereto, to the
extent vested, shall be exercisable by you until the later to occur of (i)
January 30, 2006 or (ii) such date as may be provided for by the applicable plan
documents; provided, however, that if the Termination Date (as defined in your
consulting agreement) occurs before December 31, 2005, the later of 30 days
following such Termination Date or such date as may be provided for by the
applicable plan documents.

In connection with the preparation of this letter agreement, the Company shall
reimburse you for up to 50% of your attorney's fees; provided that the Company's
aggregate reimbursement obligation shall not exceed $2,500 and such amount is
substantiated by appropriate documentation in a form satisfactory to the
Company, which shall be paid within 30 days of receipt of such documentation.

Please indicate your acceptance of the terms of this letter agreement by signing
below and returning the signed letter agreement to the Company.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Robert Beeby
----------------------------------------

Member of the Board of Directors of the
Compensation Committee


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


/s/ GM O'Connell
----------------------------------------
II 

Calendar No. 639 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1039 

[Report No. 110–287] 

To extend the authorization for the Coastal Heritage Trail in the State 

of New Jersey. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

APRIL 10, 2008 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, with an amendment 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization for the Coastal Heritage Trail 

in the State of New Jersey. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION. 

4 Section 6(c) of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 

5 note) is amended by striking ‘‘shall terminate on SepVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:25 Apr 11, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6401 E:\BILLS\S1039.RS S1039

smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 1039 RS

1 tember 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘shall terminate on Sep2 tember 30, 2011’’. 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION. 

4 Section 6 of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 

5 note) is amended as follows: 

6 (1) Strike paragraph (1) of subsection (b) and 

7 insert the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Amounts made available 

9 under subsection (a) shall be used only for— 

10 ‘‘(A) technical assistance; 

11 ‘‘(B) the design and fabrication of interpre12 tive materials, devices, and signs; and 

13 ‘‘(C) the preparation of the strategic plan.’’. 

14 (2) Paragraph (3) of subsection (b) is amended 

15 by inserting after subparagraph (B) a new subpara16 graph as follows: 

17 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (3)(A), 

18 funds made available under subsection (a) for 

19 the preparation of the strategic plan shall not re20 quire a non-Federal match.’’. 

21 (3) Subsection (c) is amended by striking ‘‘2007’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS

smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
Calendar No. 639 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1039 

[Report No. 110

–287] 

A BILL 

Heritage Trail in the State of New Jersey. 

To extend the authorization for the Coastal 

APRIL 10, 2008 

Reported with an amendment 


smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Polu Kai Services, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W912DR-09-C-0091 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58726, 58795

John M. Manfredonia, Esq.

Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC Cresskill, NJ Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Leslie M. Reed, Esq. Raymond 0. Schlee, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 29 July 2014

MICHAEL T. PAUL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58726, 58795, Appeals ofPolu Kai Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
#### BROWN v. LINTON.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Feb. 12, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1954.

Hays Lewis, Jr., and W. A. Smith, Mari-anna, for appellant.

B. L. Solomon, Marianna, for appellee.

DREW, Justice.

The notice of appeal filed in this cause on February 24, 1953 recites the appeal is taken to “review the final order * * * being a final judgment for the defendant * * * dated the 2nd day of December, 1952.” Therefore, the notice of appeal affirmatively shows .elapse of more than sixty days from and after entry of the judgment. appealed .from ■ contrary to Section 59.08, F.S.1951, F.S.A. The record elsewhere shows the verdict of the jury to have been rendered December 15, 1952, thirteen days after'the date specified for the alleged final judgment.

There is no way we can determine from the record whether the date set forth in the notice of appeal is a clerical error for the reason that contrary to the requirement of Rule 11(12) of this Court, 30 F.S.A., the record does *not*contain *any*final judgment.

The appeal is dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
December 31, 1995 10K of Charter Bancshares, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          50,193
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,716
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    197,153
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          98,915
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            99,446
<LOANS>                                        513,235
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 914,565
<DEPOSITS>                                     733,714
<SHORT-TERM>                                    91,241
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,918
<LONG-TERM>                                     14,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        710
<COMMON>                                         6,510
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 914,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 46,842
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               18,510
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,118
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                66,470
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,425
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           39,045
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      979
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 277
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 39,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,951
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,759
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.97
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,337
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,687
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,446
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,022
<RECOVERIES>                                       199
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,620
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               622
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,998
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Anthony LaFauci

v. Case No. 08-cv-77-PB

 

Warden, NH State Prison

O R D E R

I agree with the Commissioner that the undisputed facts

establish that petitioner has been given appropriate credit for

completion of a sex offender program and has in all respects 

received the good time credit to which he is entitled. His

habeas corpus petition is without merit. 

The Warden’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 27) is

granted. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 13, 2009

cc: Anthony LaFauci, pro se

Elizabeth Woodcock, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00077-PB Document 29 Filed 08/13/09 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41199

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDY GALLARDO-CAZARES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-13-2

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Edy Gallardo-Cazares has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed an original and a supplemental brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gallardo-Cazares has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41199 Document: 00513804387 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
No. 15-41199

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41199 Document: 00513804387 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          94,645
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,355,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                   110,248
<INVENTORY>                                  4,048,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,602,709
<PP&E>                                       2,036,093
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,449,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,210,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,006,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        225
<COMMON>                                        24,540
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,080,704)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,210,803
<SALES>                                      4,186,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,186,763
<CGS>                                        3,313,470
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  588,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                100,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

*“Company”*
*“Report”*

  

*Andrew      Makrides*

----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

*“Company”*
*“Report”*
Exhibit 32.0

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bizcom U.S.A., Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hanan
Klein, Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 19, 2003

                              /s/ Hanan Klein
                              -------------------------------------------
                              Hanan Klein
                              Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal
                              Financial and Accounting Officer
                              Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2031

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to allow any consumer to receive

a free credit report annually from any consumer reporting agency.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD (for herself, Ms. LEE, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr.

GUTIERREZ, Mr. FRANK, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Ms. SOLIS, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. SANCHEZ, Mr. KILDEE, Mr.

ACEVEDO-VILA ́, and Mr. UNDERWOOD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to allow any consumer to receive a free credit report annually from any

consumer reporting agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—This Act may be cited as the

5 ‘‘Consumer Credit Report Accuracy and Privacy Act of

6 2001’’.
2

•HR 2031 IH

1 SEC. 2. FREE CREDIT REPORT ANNUALLY UPON REQUEST

2 OF CONSUMER.

3 Section 612 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15

4 U.S.C. 1681j) is amended—

5 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as

6 subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol8 lowing new subsection:

9 ‘‘(c) FREE CREDIT REPORT ANNUALLY UPON RE10 QUEST OF CONSUMER.—Upon the request of any con11 sumer, any consumer reporting agency shall make all dis12 closures pursuant to section 609 without charge to such

13 consumer at least once each calendar year.’’.

14 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

15 Section 612(a)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15

16 U.S.C. 1681j(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘(c), and (d)’’

17 and inserting ‘‘(c), (d), and (e)’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GIBSON
GREETINGS, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998, AND FOR THE YEARS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,567
<SECURITIES>                                    38,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,698
<INVENTORY>                                     84,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,049
<PP&E>                                         153,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                     271,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,451
<SALES>                                        407,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               408,530
<CGS>                                          179,903
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,454)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02272-BNB

GERUN L. SCURLOCK,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOWES HIW, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

Following review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1C, the court has determined

that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the

case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR

8.1D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED November 21, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02272-WJM Document 9 Filed 11/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7611

TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD, a/k/a Vincent Edward

Little,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES HARVEY, Regional Administrator; LAURIE

F. BESSINGER, Warden; W. ROUSE; JOYCE BROWN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-96-1970-2-22AJ, CA-96-1971-2-22AJ)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Stephen Pauley,

LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for appointment

of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R.

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED