alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                      11,473
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                4,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   725
<INVENTORY>                                                  7,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            23,856
<PP&E>                                                      13,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                               9,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              30,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       11,867
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                 24,723
<COMMON>                                                    69,820
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                30,527
<SALES>                                                     25,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            25,449
<CGS>                                                       12,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               25,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (11,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (11,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (11,869)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (2.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                           
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    TAKEO K. SASAKI    
|                     |  |  |  | Takeo K. Sasaki           
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0585 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES GEOFFREY SANTORO,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2022

06/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0585
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending May 2, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodESB BANCORP INC                                                                                                         * 3A5
#### STATE ex rel. KREBS v. JUNOD.

No. 1216.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1933.

For former opinion, see 150 So. 64.

Geo. M. Wallace, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Chas. A. Holcombe, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

ELLIOTT, Judge.

: A. L. Junod, an employee of the state treasurer and the person charged by the Constitution of 1921, art. 5, § 18, with the authority and duties of the office in the absence of, or inability of, the treasurer to act, was sued' by A. L. Krebs acting under Act No. 242 of 1912, as amended, to compel the recognition of the right of Krebs to examine the public records in the office of the state treasurer.

Jess S. Cave, .treasurer, was absent at the time the demand was made on Junod, and Junod, when called on for leave to make the examination, refused to permit it to be done. He was ordered by the lower court as the person representing the authority of the office to permit the examination, and appealed the case to this court. On appeal the record showed that Jess S. Cave had returned before the trial in the lower court; just when, we were not informed, but at the time of the trial and at the time of the appeal, Cave, the treasurer, was present in person and representing the authority of the office. In such a situation we held that Junod, due to the presence of Cave, did not, in appealing, represent the authority of the office, and acting ex of-ficio, we dismissed the appeal. 150 So. 64.

In his petition for rehearing, appearing personally and individually, and not as the person having the authority of the office, he substantially and in effect alleges that this court erred in dismissing his appeal. He claims that the dismissal was, in effect, holding that the petition of Krebs set forth no cause or right of action; that he had urged in the lower court an exception to that effect, and that the lower court overruled it. That this court in dismissing the appeal stated erroneously that the lower court did not act on it. He prays that a rehearing be granted, that the ruling be reviewed, and, if the petition of the relator be found to set forth no right or cause of action, that the ruling be reversed and the suit against him dismissed on that account.

The minutes show that we were in error in stating that the lower court did not act on the exception. It was acted on and overruled, but acting on the application for rehearing, we find that the exception involved the merits and should have been referred thereto. The issue raised' by the exception was an issue on the merits. No good cause would be served by granting a rehearing in order that we may review and act on the ruling and- then dismiss the appeal.

Defendant-appellant further complains that our action leaves the judgment appealed from in effect against him and he urges that he be entitled to relief in that respect. The judgment appealed from was against him as the person next in authority and representing the authority of the office of treasurer. The judgment does not prejudice him personally nor individually and which is the capacity in which he applies for a rehearing. We see no reason for granting the request.

Rehearing refused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 97

### CFR Correction

In title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 80 to end, revised as of October 1, 2007, on page 594, in § 97.109, remove paragraph (e).

[FR Doc. E8-21929 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
                       ENRON CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 CALCULATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended
                                                      June 30,              June 30,
                                                  1997       1996       1997       1996
                                                (in millions, except per share amounts)

<S>                                             <C>          <C>      <C>          <C>
Primary Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 Earnings (loss) on common stock
   Net income (loss)                            $ (420)      $ 117    $ (198)      $ 329
   Preferred stock dividends                        (4)         (4)       (8)         (8)
                                                $ (424)      $ 113    $ (206)      $ 321

 Average number of common shares 
  outstanding                                      248         246       248         245

 Primary earnings (loss) per 
  share of common stock                         $(1.71)      $0.46    $(0.83)      $1.31

Fully Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
 Adjusted earnings (loss) on common stock
   Net income (loss)                            $ (420)      $ 117    $ (198)      $ 329
   Preferred stock dividends                        (4)         (4)       (8)         (8)
   Add back:
     Dividends on convertible preferred stock        4           4         8           8
                                                $ (420)      $ 117    $ (198)      $ 329

 Average number of common shares outstanding
  on a fully diluted basis
   Average number of common shares outstanding     248         246       248         245
   Additional shares issuable upon:
     Conversion of preferred stock                  19          19        19          19
     Exercise of stock options reduced by the
      number of shares which could have been
      purchased with the proceeds from
      exercise of such options                       5           6         5           6
                                                   272         271       272         270

 Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share of
  common stock                                  $(1.54)(a)   $0.43    $(0.73)(a)   $1.22

<FN>
(a)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)(ii) 
     although it is contrary to paragraph 40 of APB Opinion No. 15 because it produces 
     an anti-dilutive result.
</TABLE>
                                                                 
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    TAKEO K. SASAKI    
|                       |  |  |  | Takeo K. Sasaki           
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant,

v.

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,

Additional Party on Counterlcaim.

ORDER DENYING MOLYCHEM’S FIRST MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendant Molychem, LLC’s first motion for protective

order, filed September 15, 2006, which fails to allege a sufficient basis for a protective

order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

DATED: September 19, 2006

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

___________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 147 Filed 09/19/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
*To order transcripts of hearings, please contact either Patterson Transcription Company at (303) 755-4536 or 

AB Court Reporting & Video, Inc. at (303) 629-8534.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE NINA Y. WANG

 

Civil Action: 11-cv-02285-NYW Date: July 12, 2018

Courtroom Deputy: Brandy Wilkins FTR: NYW COURTROOM C-204*

Parties Attorney(s)

CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY, Caleb Durling

Ellie Lockwood

Iris Eytan

Jason M. Lynch

Plaintiff,

v.

REGGIE BICHA,

TERESA A. BERNAL, 

Elizabeth J. McCarthy

Lauren K. Peach

Tanya E. Wheeler

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 3:01 p.m.

Appearance of counsel. Mr. Mark Ivandick and Ms. Jennifer Purrington appear on behalf of 

Disability Law Colorado. Dr. Robert Werthwein appears with Mss. McCarthy, Peach and Wheeler. 

Discussion held regarding the issues outlined in the Joint Status Report [88] filed July 9, 2018. 

Parties do not anticipate taking any discovery. The parties do not anticipate presenting evidence, 

only oral argument. 

ORDERED: Oral Argument is set for September 28, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate 

Judge Nina Y. Wang for two-hours. Each party will be granted 30 minutes of 

argument. No live testimony is anticipated.

Case No. 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 90 filed 07/12/18 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
ORDERED: The following schedule will govern the briefing:

The Parties will simultaneously file motions for summary judgment no later 

than August 15, 2018.

Any responsive briefs will be due no later than September 5, 2018.

No later than September 12, 2018, the Parties will exchange their proposed 

evidentiary submission lists.

No later than September 17, 2018, the Parties will meet and confer about their 

proposed evidentiary submission lists and prepare a joint evidentiary 

submission list, including any stipulations or objections as well as a list of 

undisputed facts, with any unresolved objections to the admissibility of certain 

evidence to be determined by the court at the hearing and the basis and 

response for all such objections.

Court in Recess: 3:07 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:06

Case No. 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 90 filed 07/12/18 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 | /s/ Clifford K. Bolen   |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                    | Clifford K. Bolen,      |   |
|                    | Senior Vice President;  |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1
J. 

Hardesty 

Douglas 

months' incarceration, to run concurrently with the sentence he was 

serving in an unrelated case. We conclude that the district court properly 

ensured that Giles' designation as a Juggalo was not based upon 

impalpable or highly suspect evidence and did not err by declining to 

strike the designation from the PSI. See Gomez v. State, 130 Nev. , 

324 P.3d 1226, 1228-29 (2014). 1 

Second, Giles asserts that the district court violated his right 

to due process by declining to give him a "meaningful opportunity" to 

challenge the designation of the Juggalos as a criminal gang in his PSI. 

We decline to consider this claim because Giles does not assert that the 

court considered the Juggalos' alleged status as a gang when imposing 

sentence and merely asserts that the designation might cause him 

negative consequences in the future. See id. at , 324 P.3d at 1229; see 

generally United States v. Valentine, 783 F.2d 1413, 1417 (9th Cir. 1986) 

(generic and speculative claims of potential injuries are insufficient to 

establish a violation of due process). Accord United States v. Marion, 404 

U.S. 307, 325-26 (1971). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

'To the extent that Giles asks this court to modify Gomez, we decline 

to do so. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

3
#### A. J. LINDSEY, Petitioner, v. Albert L. SPILLERS et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Oct. 12, 1956.

Smith & Axtell, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Tom B. Stewart, Jr., Jacksonville, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari, .petitioner seeks reyiew of an order which in *866effect denied a summary final decree in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. The Chancellor based his ruling on our decision in Rivers v. Amara, Fla.1949, 40 So.2d 364. We are of the view that the cited case does not necessarily control the case at bar. However, under the circumstances reflected by - this record we find no abuse of discretion in the conclusion of the Chancellor 'to deny the' summary decree.

The prayer of the petition is denied. .

DREW, C. J., and HOBSON, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Richard Owen Taylor, Appellant

No. 06-13-00061-CV v.

Dawn Grounds, et al., Appellees

Appeal from the 202nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

12C0709-202). Opinion delivered by 

Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of 

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Taylor’s claims against John 

Doe I and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings related to those claims. We 

affirm the trial court’s dismissal of all other causes of action.

We note that the appellant, Richard Owen Taylor, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 27, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             396,596
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,355,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (91,127)
<INVENTORY>                                         95,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,037,617
<PP&E>                                          12,020,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,367,068)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,147,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,359,968
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            25,750
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,609,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,147,865
<SALES>                                         15,517,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,517,631
<CGS>                                           14,149,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,149,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   881,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2,591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 243,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    251,593
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                250,121
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       250,121
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.10














</TABLE>