alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02359-PAB-KMT

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CRATERS & FREIGHTERS GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC.,

Defendant. 

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Joint Motion for Administrative Closure

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 [Docket No. 11] filed by plaintiff The Travelers

Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) and defendant Craters & Freighters Global Logistics,

Inc. (“Craters & Freighters”).

Travelers and Craters & Freighters request that the Court administratively close

the case so that Craters & Freighters may pursue claims against others for the

damages alleged in this case which “may obviate the need for proceeding with this

action.” Docket No. 11 at 2. Further, the parties request to administratively close the

case “to ensure that any such rights or claims that one has or may have against the

other . . . do not become time-barred while Craters & Freighters pursues the Other

Claims.” Id. at 3. 

Having examined the motion and being advised in the premises, the Court finds

that the parties have stated adequate reasons to administratively close the case. 

Case 1:11-cv-02359-PAB-KMT Document 12 Filed 11/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

For the foregoing reasons, it is 

ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Administrative Closure Pursuant to

D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 [Docket No. 11] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that this case shall be administratively closed pursuant to

D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. It is further 

ORDERED that, on or before March 23, 2012, the parties shall file status reports

regarding why this case should remain administratively closed. If no status reports

have been filed by March 23, 2012, the case will be dismissed without prejudice. 

DATED November 29, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02359-PAB-KMT Document 12 Filed 11/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
218 La. 461

#### Dutrell E. BAKER v. SUN OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 39562.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1950.

.Elton A. Darsey, Houma, for intervener-applicant.

Nicholas Masters, New Orleans, for defendants-appellees.

MOISE, Justice.

For the reasons -assigned in the cases of Thibodaux et al. v. Sun Oil Company et al., Baker v. Sun Oil Company et al., and Baker v. J. C. Chance Well Service, Inc., 218 La. 453, 49 So.2d 852 handed down this day„ the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

LE BLANC, J., recused.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1979

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide assistance for the

construction of certain air traffic control towers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2001

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide assistance

for the construction of certain air traffic control towers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL

4 TOWERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 47124(b)(4) of title 49,

6 United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(4) CONSTRUCTION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL

8 TOWERS.—

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any

10 other provision of this subchapter, the Sec-
2

•HR 1979 IH

1 retary may provide grants under this sub2 chapter to an airport sponsor for—

3 ‘‘(i) the construction or improvement

4 of a nonapproach control tower; and

5 ‘‘(ii) the acquisition and installation of

6 air traffic control equipment to be used in

7 a nonapproach control tower that will as8 sist in sustaining or improving the safe

9 and efficient movement of air traffic.

10 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBILITY.—A sponsor shall be eli11 gible for a grant under this paragraph if—

12 ‘‘(i)(I) the sponsor is a participant in

13 the Federal Aviation Administration Con14 tract Tower Program (as described in

15 paragraph (3)(A)) or the pilot program es16 tablished under paragraph (3); or

17 ‘‘(II) construction of a nonapproach

18 control tower would qualify the sponsor to

19 be eligible to participate in the Contract

20 Tower Program or pilot program; and

21 ‘‘(ii) the sponsor agrees to fund not

22 less than 10 percent of the cost of the ac23 tivities receiving assistance under this

24 paragraph.
3

•HR 1979 IH

1 ‘‘(C) PROJECT COSTS.—Grants under this

2 paragraph shall be paid only from amounts

3 made available to the sponsor under sections

4 47114(c)(1), 47114(d), 47115, and 47116.

5 ‘‘(D) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal

6 share of the cost of construction of a non7 approach control tower under this paragraph

8 may not exceed $1,100,000.’’.

9 (b) NONAPPROACH CONTROL TOWER.—Section

10 47124(b) of such title is amended by adding at the end

11 the following:

12 ‘‘(5) NONAPPROACH CONTROL TOWER DE13 FINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘nonapproach

14 control tower’ has the meaning given such term in

15 Federal Aviation Administration Order 7110.65 (as

16 in effect on the date of enactment of this paragraph)

17 and the Aeronautical Information Manual (as in ef18 fect on such date of enactment).’’.

19 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

20 47124(b)(3) is amended by striking ‘‘Level I air traffic

21 control towers, as defined by the Secretary,’’ and inserting

22 ‘‘nonapproach control towers’’.
4

•HR 1979 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

3 as of October 1, 1996.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1792-DR]


Louisiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1792-DR), dated September 13, 2008, 
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Louisiana is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of September 13, 2008.

    Jefferson, Lafourche, Plaquemines, and Terrebonne Parishes for 
Individual Assistance and debris removal (Category A), including 
direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-21954 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7499

RALPH EDWARD RHODES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus REUBEN PENA, Unit Manager, MOCC, Box 582, Mt.Olive, WV 25185; WILLIAM FITZWATER, Correctional Officer, MOCC, Box 582, Mt. Olive, WV 25185; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ELLANIE, MOCC, Box 582, Mt. Olive, WV 25185; GEORGE TRENT, Warden, MOCC, Box 582, Mt. Olive, WV 25185; WILLIAM DAVIS, Commissioner, West Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-98-927-5) Submitted: January 10, 2002 Decided: January 18, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Ralph Edward Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. Charles R. Bailey, JohnThomas Molleur, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia; Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Leslie K. Tyree, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ralph Edward Rhodes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. To the extent Rhodes appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rhodes v. Pena , No. CA-98-927-5 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 8, 2001). To the extent Rhodes seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his request for appointment of counsel, we find no abuse of discretion by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Ultra-Deepwater Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Location: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, SW., Suite 1500, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Ultra-Deepwater 
Advisory Committee is to provide advice on development and 
implementation of programs related to ultra-deepwater natural gas and 
other petroleum resources to the Secretary of Energy and provide 
comments and recommendations and priorities for the Department of 
Energy Annual Plan per requirements of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, 
Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999.

Tentative Agenda

9:30 a.m.-10 a.m. Registration.
10 a.m.-11:45 a.m. Welcome and Roll Call;
    Opening Remarks by the Committee Chair;
    Report by the Editing Subcommittee;
    Facilitated discussion by the members regarding final report;
    Approval of Committee final report; and
    Preparations for the next meeting of the Committee.
11:45 a.m.-12 p.m. Public Comments.
12 p.m. Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead 
the meeting, for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to 
file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Elena 
Melchert at the address or telephone number listed above. You must make 
your request for an oral statement at least five business days prior to 
the meeting, and reasonable provisions will be made to include the 
presentation on the agenda. Public comment will follow the 5-minute 
rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 24, 2008.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-22920 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
H. Res. 998 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Bonner of Alabama. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Jordan of Ohio. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Heller of Nevada. 

COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES: Mr. Smith of 

Nebraska and Mr. Wittman of Virginia. 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Latta. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIANBO SHAO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-72815

Agency No. A205-330-702

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016**

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jianbo Shao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board 

of Immigration Appeals’s order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s 

decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-72815 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations 

created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 

2010), and review de novo due process claims, Hernandez v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 

1014, 1017 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on Shao’s omission from his asylum application that family planning 

officials threatened to sterilize him. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048; Kin v. 

Holder, 595 F.3d 1050, 1056-57 (9th Cir. 2010) (adverse credibility determination 

supported by omission of crucial facts from asylum application). Shao’s 

explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 

F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible testimony, Shao’s 

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Finally, Shao’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony 

the agency found not credible, and he does not point to any other evidence in the 

record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. See 
 3 14-72815 

id. at 1156-57. We reject his contentions that the agency did not analyze his claim 

properly. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to 

prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1129

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
      governmental plan with respect to Indian tribal governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2007

Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
      governmental plan with respect to Indian tribal governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Tribal Government Equality Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PENSION PLANS OF INDIAN TRIBAL 
              GOVERNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of section 414(d) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (definition of governmental plan) is 
amended to read as follows: ``The term `governmental plan' includes a 
plan established or maintained for its employees by an Indian tribal 
government (as defined in section 7701(a)(40)), a subdivision of an 
Indian tribal government (determined in accordance with section 
7871(d)), an agency instrumentality (or subdivision) of an Indian 
tribal government, or an entity established under Federal, State, or 
tribal law which is wholly owned or controlled by any of the 
foregoing.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 906 of the Pension Protection Act of 
2006.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Brahms Reed

v. Civil No. 08-00045-JL

National Council of the

Boy Scouts of America, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

May 5, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document #9) is approved as submitted.

The defendant will amend ¶¶ 6-7, 9-13, and 16 of its Answer

to clearly indicate its position with respect to the

corresponding paragraphs of the Complaint.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

May 5, 2008

cc: John W. Laymon, Esq.

Francis X. Quinn, Jr., Esq.

Jonathan M. Shirley, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00045-JL Document 10 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02323-BNB-KMT

DEJA FRANKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

NORTH AMERICAN ASSET SERVICES, LLC d/b/a FRONTIER FINANCIAL GROUP,

INC., 

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on the following:

(1) Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [Doc. # 46, filed 5/24/2012]

(the “Fee Petition”); and

(2) Plaintiff’s Request for Entry of Bill of Costs [Doc. # 47, filed 5/24/2012] (the

“Motion for Costs”).

I held a hearing on the pending matters this morning and made rulings on the record,

which are incorporated here.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Fee Petition [Doc. # 46] is GRANTED, and the plaintiff is awarded her

reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $12,230.50;

(2) The Motion for Costs [Doc. # 47] is DENIED; and

(3) Attorneys fees in the amount of $12,230.50 shall be added to the current

Judgment of $1,001.00 plus post-judgment interest pursuant to the Judgment [Doc. # 44].

Case 1:11-cv-02323-BNB-KMT Document 50 Filed 06/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated June 7, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02323-BNB-KMT Document 50 Filed 06/07/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending May 30, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

To Inland Resources Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of our reserve
report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto, to any reference
made to us in Form 10-K as a result of such incorporation and to the
incorporation by reference thereof into Inland's registration statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-41662), Form S-8 (File No. 333-27449), Form S-8 (File No.
33-84640), Form S-3 (File No. 33-84766), Form S-8 (File No. 333-43430), Form S-8
(File No. 333-43432), and Form S-8 (File No. 333-43434).


                                   /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


Denver, Colorado
March 26, 2002
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending January 19, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodSILICON VALLEY BANK                                                                                                     PWISilicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, requests prior approval for $21 million public welfare investment in CREA California Tax Credit Fund 70, L.P.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableSILICON VALLEY BANK                                                                                                     PWISilicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, requests prior approval for $22 million public welfare investment in Raymond James California Housing Opportunities Fund VIII L.L.C.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable