alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1099

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
  employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2007

Ms. Collins (for herself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
  employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE.

    Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by inserting before the matter following subparagraph 
        (I) the following:
                    ``(J) an individual who is employed by the 
                Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission and 
                is a citizen of the United States,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Roberto Hernandez, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing Unit and Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 727]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the documentation relating to the positive laboratory test results, including the daily log, and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report and conducted the urinalysis testing *(see, Matter of Barnwell v Goord,*268 AD2d 725, *lv denied*95 NY2d 751; *Matter of Rivera v Goord,*261 AD2d 754). Petitioner’s assertion that various procedural errors violated his constitutional rights has been reviewed and found to be without merit. In particular, we find that it was not error for the Hearing Officer to deny petitioner’s request to call as witnesses the Deputy Commissioner of Correctional Facility Operations and the Supervisor of Security at Elmira Correctional Facility. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that these individuals possessed any information relevant to the facts that gave rise to this proceeding nor did he show that he was in any way prejudiced by their absence *(see, Matter of Nijman v Goord,*294 AD2d 737; *Matter of Blanche v Selsky,*253 AD2d 944, 945, *lv denied*92 NY2d 817). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner’s assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000718944
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1982-2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         208,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,585
<PP&E>                                      38,308,758
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,050,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 645,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,862
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     502,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   645,642
<SALES>                                        685,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               693,653
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                392,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            392,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   392,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HPSC, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W. Everets, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JOHN W. EVERETSJohn W. Everets
Chief Executive Officer |  | Dated: August 13, 2003
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND II DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  364,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,163,844
<PP&E>                                      14,016,962
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,117,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,342,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          488,930
<BONDS>                                      6,231,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,531,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,342,914
<SALES>                                      2,297,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,673,328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,501,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               890,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             439,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (173,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (173,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (173,921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Felix Widder, Respondent, *v.*Louis Knaris et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March 6, 1947.

*James A. Doherty*for appellants.

*Harry Fass*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It was error for the court to refuse to charge that a bailee for hire is not an insurer, and is only required to exercise ordinary care in the preservation of the plaintiff’s property. Also the comment of the court below, made immediately following the refusal to charge as requested, was prejudicial to the defendants.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Hammer, Shientag and Eder, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02397-MSK-MEH

SHARELLE C. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a municipality;

OFFICER RICKY NIXON, in his individual and official capacity;

OFFICER KEVIN DEVINE, in his individual and official capacity;

OFFICER JOHN DOES ONE, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police Officer,

in his/her individual and official capacity; and

OFFICER JOHN DOE TWO, Denver Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau Police Officer,

in his/her individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.
DATED this 23rd day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 1, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Monroe G. Milstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Monroe G. Milstein
Monroe G. Milstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 27, 2002
Lease Agreement Extension Dated March 10, 2004



 Exhibit 10.6 
  
 LEASE AGREEMENT EXTENSION 
  
 This Lease Extension Agreement entered into by The Mallard Company as Landlord/Lessor and HYTEK, Inc., as Tenant/Lessee with reference to the following:

  
 Lessor and Lessee desire to modify and extend the Lease
Agreement and Lease Extension dated March 15, 1990 and May 23, 1997, providing the lease of space in the building commonly known as 400 Hot Springs Road, Carson City, Nevada, consisting of 23,800 square feet of office. The modified extended term
conditions are as follows: 
  

					
	 1.
	  	Size and Location	  	23,800 sq. ft. of space, identified as 400 Hot Springs Road, Carson City, Nevada
			
	 2.
	  	Second Extended Term	  	120 months.
			
	 3.
	  	Commencement Date	  	To coincide with the current Lease Agreement, expiring on July 1, 2005.
			
	 4.
	  	Rent	  	$16,150.00 per month from:
			
	 	  	 	  	July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2008 (three years no increase)
			
	 	  	 	  	Annual increases of 3% from:
			
	 	  	 	  	July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2015
			
	 5.
	  	Tenant Improvements	  	Landlord will provide space reconfiguration to include:


					
			
	 	  	a.	  	Installation of footing and front glass walk-way (per drawing)
			
	 	  	b.	  	Demolition of walls (per drawing)
			
	 	  	c.	  	Construction of walls for conference room, lobby area, new offices, server room, janitors closet, back block wall, partition wall in work area (per drawing)
			
	 	  	d.	  	Provision for 10 new doors and frames
			
	 	  	e.	  	Addition of drop ceiling in south office areas, where none is currently installed
			
	 	  	f.	  	Removal of electrical wiring (basic building wiring)
			
	 	  	g.	  	Replacement of electrical wiring in new wall areas (basic wall duplex provision)
			
	 	  	h.	  	Provision of additional ducting for HVAC to new office areas
			
	 	  	i.	  	Expansion of identified bathroom to ADA compliant (per drawing)
			
	 	  	j.	  	Expand storage room and put back into operation previous bathroom (per drawing)
			
	 	  	k.	  	Build janitors closet adjacent to bathroom (per drawing)
			
	 	  	l.	  	New carpet and VCT hard tile in areas of need or to match









					
	 6.
	  	Options	  	Lessor grants Lessee an Option to Renew for one (1) five (5) year term, with notice given six (6) months or sooner.

  
 All terms and conditions of the
current Lease Agreement not specifically amended by this Extension Agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the remaining term and extended term of this Lease. 
  
 Dated this 10 day of March, 2004 
  
  

			
	The Mallard Company
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dinah Deane, Trustee

	 	 	

	 c/o
	 	 Mallard Investment Management, Inc.
 Paul W. Deane, Property Manager
 3490 Southampton Drive
 Reno, Nevada 89509

	 	 	 
	
	HYTEK Microsystems
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Philip S. Bushnell

	 	 	

	 c/o
	 	 Philip S. Bushnell, Chief Financial Officer
 400 Hot Spring Road
 Carson City, Nevada 89706
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, October 23, 2008 at the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. This meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m. During this meeting Provincial Advisory Committee members will share information on new developments relating to the Northwest Forest Plan, receive an update on the Access Travel Management Plan and the Recreation Facilities Analysis Master Plan, and offer input on the future role of the Provincial Advisory Committee. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Becki Heath, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-9200.

Dated: September 29, 2008.

Rebecca Lockett Heath,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.

[FR Doc. E8-23406 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
II 

Calendar No. 248 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1110 

[Report No. 110–115] 

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 

1992 to provide for the conjunctive use of surface and ground water 

in Juab County, Utah. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2007 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. BENNETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 to provide for the conjunctive 

use of surface and ground water in Juab County, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juab County Surface 

5 and Ground Water Study and Development Act of 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 1110 RS

1 SEC. 2. CONJUNCTIVE USE OF SURFACE AND GROUND 

2 WATER, CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT. 

3 Section 202(a)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Au4 thorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (Public Law 102– 

5 575; 106 Stat. 4609) is amended by inserting ‘‘Juab,’’ 

6 after ‘‘Davis,’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 248 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1110 

[Report No. 110

–115] 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization 

Juab County, Utah. conjunctive use of surface and ground water in and Adjustment Act of 1992 to provide for the 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2005: Q2... 7.3 7.3 n.a. 6.7

 Q3... 7.6 7.7 n.a. 7.0

 Q4... 8.0 8.0 n.a. 7.3

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 n.a. 7.5

 Q2... 8.7 8.8 n.a. 7.9

 Q3... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.8

 Q4... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.7

2007: Q1... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.7

 Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2005: Q2... 8.1 8.3 8.2 7.6

 Q3... 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.0

 Q4... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.1

2006: Q1... 9.0 9.2 8.8 8.2

 Q2... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.1

 Q3... 9.6 9.7 9.4 8.5

 Q4... 9.5 9.6 9.3 8.7

2007: Q1... 9.4 9.7 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2005: Q2... 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.7

 Q3... 8.1 8.0 8.0 7.9

 Q4... 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.0

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.1 8.7 8.4

 Q2... 9.0 9.2 8.8 8.8

 Q3... 9.3 9.2 8.8 8.6

 Q4... 9.3 9.3 8.9 8.4

2007: Q1... 9.1 9.0 8.6 8.3

 Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2005: Q2... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.2 8.1 7.6

 Q4... n.a. 8.5 8.4 7.9

2006: Q1... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.1

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.2 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.2 9.0 8.4

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2005: Q2... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

 Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.3 7.8

2006: Q1... n.a. 8.4 8.5 7.9

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.0 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.9 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2005: Q2... n.a. 7.5 7.9 7.9

 Q3... n.a. 8.3 8.2 8.1

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

2006: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.7 8.2

 Q2... n.a. 9.2 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.1 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                 CONVERSE INC.
                   INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE ON JULY 22, 1986

                                 SUBSIDIARIES
                                 ------------

CONVERSE STAR I, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Massachusetts on March 26, 1985

CONVERSE EMEA LTD., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on January 29, 1990

CONVERSE FRANCE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in France)

CONVERSE EUROPE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in the Netherlands)

CONVERSE BENELUX, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branches in the Netherlands and
Belgium)

CONVERSE BENELUX HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993

CONVERSE GERMANY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on March 21, 1994 (branch in Germany)

CONVERSE IBERIA, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on July 8, 1994 (branches in Portugal and Spain)

CONVERSE ITALY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on September 21, 1994 (branch in Italy)

CONVERSE JAPAN, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 21, 1994 (branch in Japan)

CONVERSE SCANDINAVIA, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on June 7, 1995 (branch in Denmark)

CONVERSE PACIFIC, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on May 2, 1996 (branch in Japan)

CONVERSE MEXICO, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on October 23, 1996 (branch in Mexico)

CONVERSE ALL STAR DO BRASIL INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA., a subsidiary of Converse
Inc.
Incorporated in Brazil

CALZADO DEPORTIVO DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Mexico on January 25, 1984

CONVERSE EXPORT CO. LIMITED, a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Barbados on December 28, 1984 (a foreign sales corporation)

APEX ONE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in New Jersey on July 8, 1988
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANGEL LUIS DIAZ-CURET,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1694

[June 10, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan Alspector, 

Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 11-18318CF10A and 11-20193CF10A.

Angel Luis Diaz-Curet, Quincy, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.