alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 23.0


Consent of Ernst & Young LLP Independent Auditors

We consent to the use of our report dated January 22, 1998 included in the 
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Digital Sound Corporation for the year ended 
December 31, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements included
in this form 10-K.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Digital Sound 
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the 
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, 
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, 
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-09755, Form S-8 No. 33-35019, Form S-8 No. 33-42184, Form S-8
No. 33-50376, Form S-8 No. 33-67000, Form S-8 No. 84730, and Form S-8 No. 333-
31783) pertaining to the 1983 Employee Stock Option Plan, the Directors' Stock
Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Digital Sound Corporation or
our report dated January 22, 1998, with respect to the financial statements and
schedule of Digital Sound Corporation included in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



By /s/ Ernst & Young L.L.P.
--------------------------- 
Ernst & Young L.L.P.
Exhibit 23(ii)



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community Bancorp. of our report dated January 10, 2003, included in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community Bancorp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-18535) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44713) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated January 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.





/s/ A.M. Peisch & Company





March 29, 2005
St. Johnsbury, Vermont
VT Reg. No. 92-0000102
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2016

No. 04-16-00248-CR

Thomas Isaac BARRERA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10148

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file the electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents:

1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and 

Stipulations, and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain;

3. The judgment;

4. All post-judgment motions and orders;

5. The notice of appeal;

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. The criminal docket sheet.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk 

of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court 

clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

----

| Name      of Subsidiary                                                      |              | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                                              |              |
| Shuffle      Master International, Inc.                                           | Nevada            |
| Shuffle      Master Australia Pty Ltd.                                       | Australia         |
| Gaming      Products Pty., Ltd.                                                   | Australia         |
| VIP      Gaming Solutions Pty Limited                                        | Australia         |
| Shuffle      Master Australasia Holdings Pty Ltd                             | Australia         |
| Shuffle      Master Australasia Pty Ltd                                      | Australia         |
| Shuffle      Master Holding GmbH                                                  | Austria           |
| Shuffle      Master Management-Services GmbH                                      | Austria           |
| Shuffle      Master GmbH                                                          | Austria           |
| Shuffle      Master Holding GmbH & Co Financing      Consulting-KEG | Austria           |
| Shuffle      Master GmbH & Co KG (dba CARD)                    | Austria           |
| Shuffle      Up Productions, Inc.                                                 | Delaware          |
| CARD      Casinos Austria Research and Development Limited                        | New      Zealand  |
| Shuffle      Master Asia Limited                                                  | Macau             |
| Stargames      Pty Ltd (subsidiaries listed below)                                | Australia         |
| CARD      Shuffle Master Investments (Proprietary) Limited                        | South      Africa |

| Name      of Subsidiary                          |             | Jurisdiction      of Incorporation  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Stargames      Group Management Pty Limited           | Australia        |
| Stargames      Holdings Pty Limited                   | Australia        |
| Professional      Vending Services Pty Limited        | Australia        |
| Stargames      Australia Pty Limited                  | Australia        |
| Stargames      Investments Pty Limited                | Australia        |
| Stargames      Corporation Pty Limited                | Australia        |
| Precise      Craft Pty Limited                        | Australia        |
| Stargames      Property Pty Limited                   | Australia        |
| Australasian      Gaming Industries Pty Limited       | Australia        |
| Advem      Pty Limited                                | Australia        |
| Stargames      Assets Pty Limited                     | Australia        |
| Stargames      Corporation (NZ) Pty Limited | New      Zealand |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending April 25, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITIZENS FINANCIAL CORP.                                                                                                3A1Citizens Financial Corp, Elkins, West Virginia, to become a West Virginia corporation and bank holding company by merging with Citizens Financial Corp, Elkins, West Virginia, a Delaware corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens Bank of West Virginia, Inc., Elkins, West Virginia.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY CHRISANTHIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

BRIAN CASON; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-15028

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-02472-WHA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Anthony Chrisanthis appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging that defendants retaliated against him for reporting unsafe

workplace conditions in violation of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) and

FILED

JUN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-15028

other laws . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, 

Mangano v. United States, 529 F.3d 1243, 1245 n.2 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Chrisanthis’s FTCA claims because

defendants’ alleged retaliatory conduct fell within the scope of the Civil Service

Reform Act’s prohibited personnel practices, and thus his claims were preempted. 

See id. at 1246.

We do not consider issues that were not raised in Chrisanthis’s opening

brief. See Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Kempthorne, 520 F.3d 1024, 1033 (9th

Cir. 2008) (arguments not raised by a party in the opening brief are deemed

abandoned).

Chrisanthis’s contention regarding the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s

representation of defendants Cason and Spivey is unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01761-RPM

THE ESTATE OF CARLOS BASSATT,

CARLOS BASSATT, JR.,

Personal representative,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and

PATRICK SANCHEZ,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

STAY ORDER

____________________________________________________________________________

On July 15, 2013, the plaintiff filed a request for stay of order assessing costs pending

appeal [95]. Defendant has not filed a response. It is therefore now

ORDERED that the motion is granted and the execution of the award of Defendant’s

costs is stayed pending appeal in the Tenth Circuit United States Court of Appeals.

DATED: August 14th, 2013

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01761-RPM-BNB Document 96 Filed 08/14/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1103

___________

Romie Grady, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

D. Cross, Lt., East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, ADC; J. A. Greer, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Sgt., East Arkansas Regional Unit, *

ADC; C. M. Harris, C. P. L. Officer, *

East Arkansas Regional Unit; K. Duke, *

CO-I, East Arkansas Regional Unit, *

ADC; Pickett, CO-I, East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, ADC; Weathers, CO-I, *

East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; - *

Evans, Grievance Officer, East *

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; *

Juanita Mathis, Hearing Officer, East *

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; F. *

Walls, Assistant Warden, East Arkansas *

Regional Unit, ADC; Larry Norris, *

Director, Arkansas Department of *

Correction, *

*

Appellees.

___________

 Submitted: September 24, 2003

 Filed: October 6, 2003

___________
1

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas. 

-2-

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Romie Grady brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against

prison and correction officials alleging that he was assaulted by prison officials in

retaliation for filing grievances, and that correction officials failed to investigate the

assault. Prior to service, the district court1

 dismissed the action because Mr. Grady

had failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

We agree that dismissal was proper: Mr. Grady did not file and exhaust a

grievance against Mr. Norris, a named defendant, before commencing this action.

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002) (administrative

exhaustion is prerequisite to § 1983 prison-conditions lawsuit even if administrative

remedies are not plain, speedy, and effective, and relief inmate seeks is not available);

Johnson v. Jones, Nos. 02-3775 & 02-3983, 2003 WL 21982179, at *2 (8th Cir.

Aug. 2, 2003) (inmate must exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in

federal court); Graves v. Norris, 218 F.3d 884, 885-86 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam)

(dismissal proper where at least some of plaintiff’s claims were unexhausted).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, and deny all

pending motions.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23056]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time:  Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-10: Wide Orbit, Inc. d/b/a 
VoterVoter.com by Joseph M. Birkenstock, Esquire.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2008-13: Pacific Green Party of Oregon, by 
Patrick Driscoll, Treasurer.
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Repeal of Millionaires' Amendment 
Regulations.
    Management and Administrative Matters.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

Date and Time:  Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information:  Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-23056 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.18

                        AMENDMENT TO ROBERT K. MOSES, JR.
                                WARRANT AGREEMENT


         THIS AGREEMENT, between Weatherford International, Inc. ("Weatherford")
and Robert K. Moses, Jr. (the "Non-Employee Director") is as follows:

         WHEREAS, Weatherford previously approved the Robert K. Moses, Jr.
Warrant Agreement (the "Warrant Agreement");

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, Weatherford granted, on the
8th day of September, 1998, to the Non-Employee Director a warrant for 60,000
shares of Weatherford common stock at $18.125 per share (the "Warrant");

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Weatherford has approved of a
distribution to Weatherford's stockholders of all of the stock of Grant Prideco,
Inc. (the "Spin-Off") pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the
Distribution Agreement by and between Weatherford and Grant Prideco, Inc.; and

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Weatherford has approved an
adjustment to the exercise price under the Warrant and the number of shares
subject to the Warrant to reflect the relative values of Weatherford common
stock and Grant Prideco common stock after giving effect to the Spin-Off;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Warrant Agreement is amended by adding thereto the
following provisions:

         Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary,
the Warrant is hereby adjusted as follows. Following the Distribution Date as
defined in the Distribution Agreement by and between Weatherford and Grant
Prideco, Inc., the Non-Employee Director will have the right under the Warrant
to purchase 93,629 shares of Weatherford common stock for $11.615 per share.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Weatherford has executed this Agreement this
________ day of ________________________, 2000.



                                          WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Agreed and Accepted                       By
                                            -----------------------------------
                                          Title
By                                             --------------------------------
  -----------------------------
   Robert K. Moses, Jr.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

July 23, 2004                                   /s/ Richard J. Lampen
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Richard J. Lampen
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 09/79-0454]

Notice is hereby given that Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P., 4 Main Street, Suite 50, Los Altos, CA 94022, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended  (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to Invivodata, Inc., 2100 Wharton Street, Suite 505, Pittsburgh, PA 15203.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Horizon Ventures Fund I, L.P. and Horizon Ventures Advisors Fund I, L.P., both Associates of Horizon Ventures Fund II, L.P., own in the aggregate more than ten percent of Invivodata, Inc. Therefore this transaction is considered a financing of an Associate requiring prior SBA approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: September 23, 2008.

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

 [FR Doc. E8-23466 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2207

OLLYE TINE SNOW REYNOLDS; BOBBY O. REYNOLDS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; THE FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; ROBERT SPILLANE, Former Superintendent; ALLEN LEIS, Former Director of Personnel, then Deputy Superintendent, now Interim Superintendent, Fairfax County Public School System (as employees and individuals); LOUDOUN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; MANASSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; FALLS CHURCH CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; ARLINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendants - Appellees, and SAINT MARY’S COLLEGE, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1592-A) Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 22, 19992 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds, Bobby O. Reynolds, Appellants Pro Se. John Francis Cafferky, Ingo Frank Burghardt, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, McLean, Virginia; Richard Mark Dare, Merrell B. Renaud, HAZEL & THOMAS, P.C., Falls Church, Virginia; Martin Ritchie Crim, SMITH & DAVENPORT, Manassas, Virginia; Carol Winfield McCoskrie, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Ollye Tine Snow Reynolds and Bobby O. Reynolds appeal the district court’s order dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, because the Plaintiffs failed to state a claim, we affirm. See Reynolds v. Fairfax County Pub. Schs. , No. CA-97-1592- A (E.D. Va. July 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED