alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Meridian National Corporation
                       List of Subsidiaries of Registrant



                                                  State of Incorporation
          Subsidiary                                  or Organization
          ----------                                  ---------------

     Ottawa River Steel Company                               Ohio

     National Metal Processing, Inc.                          Michigan

     Meridian Environmental Services, Inc.                    Michigan

     EPI Technologies, Inc.                                   Delaware

          Subsidiaries of EPI Technologies, Inc.
          --------------------------------------

             National Purification, Inc.                      Ohio

             MEPI Corp.                                       Ohio

     Environmental Purification Industries Company,           Ohio
             a general partnership 100% owned by
             National Purification, Inc. and MEPI Corp.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Feller, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 689]

Crew III, J.

CrewAppeal from a judgment of the County Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), rendered December 9, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree and of violating the terms of his probation.

While on probation, defendant was charged by indictment with assault in the first degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree and violation of probation and waived his right to appeal. Defendant thereafter was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years on the probation violation and five years on the assault conviction. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant’s challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is foreclosed by his voluntary waiver of the right to appeal, and is unpreserved due to his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Tausinger,*21 AD3d 1181, 1182 [2005]; *People v Briggs,*21 AD3d 652, 653 [2005]; *People v Wehrle,*308 AD2d 660, 661 [2003]). Moreover, defendant’s statements during the plea colloquy did not negate an essential element of the crime or cast significant doubt upon his guilt so as to trigger the exception to the preservation requirement *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Reid,*21 AD3d 1215, 1216 [2005]; *People v Bethea,*19 AD3d 813, 814 [2005]). Finally, given defendant’s knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review his contention that the sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice *(see People v Clow,*10 AD3d 803, 804 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 216

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the exemption from

income tax for social clubs found to be practicing prohibited discrimination.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the

exemption from income tax for social clubs found to

be practicing prohibited discrimination.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR SOCIAL

4 CLUBS PRACTICING PROHIBITED DISCRIMI5 NATION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (i) of section 501 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to prohibition

8 of discrimination by certain social clubs) is amended—

9 (1) by inserting before the period at the end of

10 the first sentence ‘‘, or if, at any time during the
2

HR 216 IH

1 taxable year or a prior taxable year, a determination

2 by an appropriate government agency or court that

3 such organization has a pattern or practice of so dis4 criminating against any person became final’’, and

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen6 tence:

7 ‘‘A final determination shall cease to be taken into account

8 under the first sentence after the date it is established

9 to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the organization

10 no longer engages in discrimination of the type involved

11 in such determination.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Jacques Mot
                                           ------------------------
                                           Jacques Mot
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           September 13, 2006
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED GR EGORY KURC , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 3047 LT Case No. 2020

- DR

- 3805 ANDR EA COMPTON ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed May 3, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County , Ann Melinda Craggs , J udge. Gregory K urc, O cklawaha, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVAN DER , HARRIS and SASSO , JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SMF Energy Corporation(the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SMF Energy Corporationand will be retained by SMF Energy Corporationand
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








/s/
      Richard E. Gathright





Richard
      E. Gathright


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


November
      14, 2007








/s/
      Michael S. Shore


Michael
      S. Shore


Chief
      Financial Officer and Senior Vice President


November
      14, 2007
H. Res. 862 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 12, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

4299) to extend the Terrorism Insurance Program of the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes. All points 

of order against consideration of the bill are waived except 

those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion 

to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4299 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2 

•HRES 862 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Richard E. Gathright, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Streicher Mobile
Fueling, Inc.;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

   5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

   Date: November 14, 2003


   /S/ RICHARD E. GATHRIGHT
   -------------------------------------
   Richard E. Gathright
   President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                         509
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5402
<ALLOWANCES>                                   952
<INVENTORY>                                   2393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              8895
<PP&E>                                        1754
<DEPRECIATION>                                3841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               18586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4864
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                    5945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 18586
<SALES>                                      60388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             66294
<CGS>                                        55265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                55265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               237
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4096
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2752
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2752
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .23





</TABLE>
[805 NYS2d 846]

#### In the Matter of Edward Lawrence Abrams, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

December 19, 2005

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Faith Lorenzo,*Hauppauge *(Nancy B. Gabriel*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

*259On November 3, 2004, the respondent appeared with counsel before the Honorable Richard A. LaPera, in the County Court, Nassau County, and entered a plea of guilty to one count of insurance fraud in the fourth degree, a class E felony (Penal Law § 176.15). On September 30, 2005, the respondent was sentenced to five years probation and ordered to pay restitution in the sum of $38,000 and a fine of $1,000.

Judiciary Law § 90 (4) mandates that an attorney’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys upon his or her conviction of a New York State felony. Accordingly, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.

Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Edward Lawrence Abrams, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent, Edward Lawrence Abrams, shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Edward Lawrence Abrams, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that if the respondent, Edward Lawrence Abrams, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10 (f).
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RURAL TREMAINE SCOTT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2730

[ May 23, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017CF001487E

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A.

Folley, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002











The undersigned officer of Pizza Inn, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2011, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














Date: September 14, 2011

By:
/s/  Charles R. Morrison

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gary W. Rada, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended August 4, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated September 17, 2007             
|                                     
|/s/ Gary W. Rada                     
|Gary W. Rada                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit21.1**

 

**GOLFTRUST OF AMERICA, INC.LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

GTA GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

 

GTA LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

 

Golf Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in whichGTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

 

Sandpiper—Golf Trust, LLC, a California limited liability company

 

GTA—Tierra Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Osage, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Palm Desert, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Brentwood, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Management, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Sweetwater, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Wekiva, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Cypress Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Polo Trace, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Black Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Bonaventure, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Pete Dye, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Mystic Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Stonehenge, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Lost Oaks, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA—Innisbrook, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

 

GTA – IB, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

 

GTA – IB Operations, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

 

GTA – IB Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

 

GTA – IB Condominium, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

 

GTA – IB Golf Resort, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

 

----
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January 14, 2010        |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/ Timothy J. Parrott  |
| Timothy J. Parrott      |
| Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1727 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1727

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent 
treatment of survivor benefits for public safety officers killed in the 
                             line of duty.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1727

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 to provide for consistent 
treatment of survivor benefits for public safety officers killed in the 
                             line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Hero Survivor Benefit 
Fairness Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. CONSISTENT TREATMENT OF SURVIVOR BENEFITS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

    Subsection (b) of section 1528 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 
(Public Law 105-34) is amended by striking the period and inserting ``, 
and to amounts received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2001, with respect to individuals dying on or before December 31, 
1996.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```