alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TBC Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas W. Garvey,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




March 15, 2004                         By /s/ Thomas W. Garvey
--------------                            ------------------------------------
                                          Thomas W. Garvey
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer (principal
                                              financial and accounting officer)
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1066 

To require the Secretary of Education to revise regulations regarding student 

loan repayment deferment with respect to borrowers who are in postgraduate medical or dental internship, residency, or fellowship programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. KERRY, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to revise regulations 

regarding student loan repayment deferment with respect 

to borrowers who are in postgraduate medical or dental 

internship, residency, or fellowship programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Education Af5 fordability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULATION REVISION REQUIRED. 

7 (a) ACTION REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days 

8 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
2 

•S 1066 IS

1 Education shall revise the regulations of the Department 

2 of Education that are promulgated to carry out the provi3 sions relating to student loan repayment deferment under 

4 the Federal Family Education Loan Program under part 

5 B of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

6 U.S.C. 1071 et seq.), the William D. Ford Federal Direct 

7 Loan Program under part D of title IV of such Act (20 

8 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.), and the Federal Perkins Loan Pro9 gram under part E of title IV of such Act (20 U.S.C. 

10 1087aa et seq.), which are promulgated under sections 

11 682.210, 685.204, and 674.34 of title 34, Code of Federal 

12 Regulations, to comply with the requirements of sub13 section (b). 

14 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—The student loan repayment 

15 deferment regulations shall be revised to provide, with re16 spect to a borrower who is in a postgraduate medical or 

17 dental internship, residency, or fellowship program, that 

18 if the borrower qualifies for student loan repayment 

19 deferment under the economic hardship provision— 

20 (1) the deferment shall be available for the 

21 length of the internship, residency, or fellowship pro22 gram if the program— 

23 (A) must be successfully completed by the 

24 borrower before the borrower may begin profes25 sional practice or service; or 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
3 

•S 1066 IS

1 (B) leads to a degree or certificate award2 ed by a health professional school, hospital, or 

3 health care facility that offers postgraduate 

4 training; and 

5 (2) the borrower shall not be required to apply 

6 annually for such student loan repayment deferment 

7 during the length of the program. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC74 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2159 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2159

To provide for grants to States for enacting statewide laws regulating 
    public playgrounds consistent with playground safety guidelines 
         established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2001

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for grants to States for enacting statewide laws regulating 
    public playgrounds consistent with playground safety guidelines 
         established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Safe Playgrounds Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANT FOR ENACTING PLAYGROUND SAFETY STANDARDS.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the availability of appropriations for 
this purpose, the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall provide a 
grant in the amount of $1,000,000 to any State which meets the 
requirements of subsection (b).
    (b) Eligibility.--A State is eligible for a grant under subsection 
(a) if, not more than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, 
such State has enacted a statewide law regulating public playgrounds 
consistent with the guidelines contained in the Handbook for Public 
Playground Safety, published by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
or other playground safety guidelines established by the Commission.
    (c) Use of Grant Funds.--A State receiving a grant under this Act 
shall use the grant to upgrade public playgrounds in accordance with 
the guidelines described in subsection (b).

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Consumer Product 
Safety Commission for carrying out this Act $50,000,000 for the period 
encompassing fiscal years 2002 through 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### CASTELLANO v. BUSBEE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TERRY TERRELL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2292

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 13, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Roger A. Alcott, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, 

Concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIANBO SHAO,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72815 Agency No. A205

- 330

- 702

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 14, 2016 **
Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND , Circuit Judges. Jianbo Shao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 22 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72815

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. W e review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act , Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010) , and review de novo due process clai ms, Hernandez v. Mukasey , 524 F.3d 1014, 1017 (9th Cir. 2008)

. We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on Shao’s omission from his asylum application that family planning

officia ls threatened to steriliz e him

. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048; Kin v.

Holder , 595 F.3d 1050, 1056

- 57 (9th Cir. 2010) (adverse credibility determination supported by omission of crucial facts from asylum application )

. Shao’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Zamanov v. Holder , 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible testimony, Shao’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9t h Cir. 2003). Finally, Shao’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and he does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be

tortu red by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. See3 14

- 72815

id. at 1156

- 57

. We reject his contention s that the agency did not analyze his claim properly. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim )

.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending November 7, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADYEN N.V.                                                                                                              FBSEAAdyen, N.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, to establish a branch in San Francisco, California, pursuant to Section 7(d) of the International Banking Act.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableBROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                          * 4c8
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending December 12, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodEASTERN SAVINGS BANK                                                                                                    * BranchApplication by Eastern Savings Bank, Norwich, Connecticut, to establish a new full service branch at 220 W. Town Street, Norwich, Connecticut pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableNORTHERN BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                  4c8Section 4(c)(8) notice filed by Northern Bancorp, Inc. to make, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Northern Bank & Trust Company, both of Woburn, Massachusetts, a minority investment in SmartNest, Inc. and thereby to engage in providing collection agency and data processing services pursuant to Section 225.23 of Regulation Y.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicablePENTUCKET BANK HOLDINGS, MHC                                                                                            * 3A1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 44 9 . ALUNDA MI TCHELL v

. EXTRA SPACE STORAGE.

Al u n d a M i t ch el l s u ed Ex t ra Sp ace St orag e i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. Fo l l o wi n g an
ad v ers e ru l i ng , M i t ch el l ap p eal ed to s u p e r i o r c o u rt
, w h i ch d i s m i s s ed h er ap p eal

. M i t ch el l t h en fi led t h i s d i rect ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i on

. Becau s e t he o rd er at i s su e d i s p o s es o f a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt

d eci s i o n , M i t ch el l was req u i red t o fo l l o w t h e d is cret i o nary ap p eal p ro ced u res

. See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); En g l i s h v. Del b r i d ge , 21 6 G a. Ap p. 3 6 6

, 3 6 7 (4 5 4 SE2 d 1 7 5 )
(1 9 9 5). M i t ch el l ’ s fai l u re t o d o s o d e p r i v e s u s o f ju ri s d ict i on o v er t hi s ap p eal

. Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 15, 2017

11/15/2017
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 16, 2009 

l0909 

Order 

 

September 16, 2009 

138549 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138549 

 COA: 285678 

 Jackson CC: 07-003773-FH 

MATTHEW PATRICK MERCIER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and CAVANAGH and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 10 filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02304-WYD-MJW 

RICKY D=SOUZA and 

JENNIFER D=SOUZA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

VINCI LAW OFFICE, LLC, 

Defendant. 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulation to Dismiss Case With 

Prejudice [ECF No. 21], filed December 28, 2011. After carefully reviewing the 

above-captioned case, I find that the stipulation should be approved and this case should 

be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Stipulation to Dismiss Case With Prejudice [ECF No. 21] is 

APPROVED. In accordance therewith, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, 

each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs. 

DATED: January 3, 2012. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

 WILEY Y. DANIEL, 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:11-cv-02304-WYD-MJW Document 22 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
|With the issue dated January 8, 2002 (containing data for December 2001), the Federal Reserve will cease publication of the monthly G.13 statistical release, "Selected Interest Rates."
The data reported on the G.13 are available elsewhere:The H.15 weekly release is available in print and on the Board's public web site.
The H.15 daily update and the H.15 historical data are available only on the Boards public web site.An analysis of usage of the Board's web site revealed that demand for the G.13 is small compared with that for the H.15 (for example, the web version of the H.15 is requested 34 times more frequently than the web version of the G.13). The Board solicited public comment regarding the proposed discontinuance of the G.13 between late May and late June of this year. The response was limited. Of a total of 48 replies received either through the mail or the web site, 31 supported discontinuance and 17 opposed it.

Statistical releases
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 10, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,884
<PP&E>                                         239,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,614
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,038
<SALES>                                         52,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,110
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,323
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (134)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2005: Q2... 17 58 25 5 62 33 8 5

 Q3... 33 61 6 9 68 23 28 6 Q4... 26 32 42 4 55 41 18 52006: Q1... 37 38 25 6 62 32 22 5 Q2... 40 47 13 9 59 32 27 5 Q3... 52 41 7 20 59 21 47 4 Q4... 35 27 38 17 54 29 34 42007: Q1... 21 29 50 11 50 38 19 4 Q2... 10 39 51 4 55 41 7 5

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2005: Q2... 15 59 26 5 64 31 14 6

 Q3... 35 52 14 15 54 31 34 5 Q4... 30 49 21 13 58 30 27 52006: Q1... 31 52 16 13 58 29 27 5 Q2... 37 57 6 15 60 25 37 5 Q3... 42 48 10 15 54 31 31 5 Q4... 25 43 32 8 62 29 18 62007: Q1... 18 38 44 5 59 36 14 5 Q2... 13 49 39 7 55 38 12 5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2005: Q2... 13 50 38 8 58 33 8 5

 Q3... 24 38 38 19 62 19 29 5 Q4... 24 29 48 14 62 24 24 42006: Q1... 36 45 18 18 68 14 27 5 Q2... 35 48 17 17 65 17 32 5 Q3... 23 55 23 5 86 9 23 5 Q4... 22 44 33 11 72 17 17 62007: Q1... 20 30 50 0 75 25 5 5 Q2... 10 15 75 5 70 25 10 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT 21


                               A.G. EDWARDS, INC.

                            REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES


    The following listing includes the registrant's directly-owned subsidiaries
and indirectly-owned subsidiaries (certain subsidiaries which are not
significant are omitted from the listing), all of which are included in the
consolidated financial statements:

                                              State of
                                              Incorporation/
Name of Company                               Organization       Subsidiary of

A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (Edwards)             Delaware    Registrant
  The Ceres Investment Company                  Missouri    Edwards
AGE Commodity Clearing Corp.                    Delaware    Registrant
A.G. Edwards Life Insurance Company             Missouri    Registrant
Edwards Development Corporation                 Missouri    Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company (Missouri Trust)     Missouri    Registrant
  A.G. Edwards Investment Management
    Consulting Services, Inc.                   Missouri    Missouri Trust
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                      New Jersey  Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                      Texas       Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                      Florida     Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company FSB                  Federal     Registrant
A.G.E. Properties, Inc. (Properties)            Missouri    Registrant
  A.G.E. Realty Corp.                           Missouri    Properties
  A.G.E. Redevelopment Corporation              Missouri    Properties
GULL-AGE Capital Group, Inc.                    Delaware    Registrant
AGE Investments, Inc.                           Delaware    Registrant
A.G. Edwards Capital, Inc.                      Delaware    Registrant
AGE Capital Holding, Inc.                       Delaware    Registrant