alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02219-LTB-CBS

ELVIS BAKER and DORIS BAKER, deceased,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DAVID THOMSON and

GREYHOUND LINES, INC.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With

Prejudice (Doc 46 - filed December 7, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the

premises, it is therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to

pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

DATED: December 10, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02219-LTB-CBS Document 47 Filed 12/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF AMSCAN  HOLDINGS,  INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND FOR THE
SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001024729
<NAME>                        AMSCAN HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US $
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                         19,833
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  45,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,507)
<INVENTORY>                                    46,483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              120,028
<PP&E>                                         64,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,012)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,798
<BONDS>                                        231,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (93,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,016
<SALES>                                        104,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,247
<CGS>                                           67,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,654
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
1 “[#9]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02253-REB-MJW

MELISSA CRAFT,

EMILY PELLIGRINI,

AUBREY DEMPSEY,

DEBRALYNN DEMPSEY,

MARK REYNA,

NICHOLAS HAMRA,

JESSICA MUTSCHLER,

GERARDO IVAN RANERO, a minor by his next friend MARIA WARD,

KENNETH KELLY,

SANDRA KELLY,

LEAH KELLY,

KRISTINA BEAGLE,

DANIEL TAKAMI,

GLORIA SANCHEZ,

ALEXANDER GORHAM,

JAMES E. McLEAN,

THERESA McLEAN,

JACLYN McLEAN,

JOSEF McLEAN, and

JAMES E. McLEAN, JR.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is Defendant United States of America’s Motion To

Consolidate Case and Certificate of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 [#9]1

Case 1:11-cv-02253-REB-BNB Document 10 Filed 09/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

 I note that defendant has filed identical motions in two other pending cases as well. (See

Defendant United States of America’s Motion To Consolidate Case and Certificate of Compliance

With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 [#9] filed September 8, 2011, Contag et al. v. United States, Civil Case No.

11-cv-01832-MSK-MJW; Defendant United States of America’s Motion To Consolidate Case and

Certificate of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 [#9] filed September 8, 2011, Global Aerospace,

Inc. v. United States, Civil Case No. 11-cv-01874-WYD-KMT.) 

filed September 8, 2011. I deny the motion. 

Pursuant to the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the

District of Colorado-Civil, “[a] motion to consolidate shall be decided by the district judge

to whom the oldest numbered case involved in the proposed consolidation is assigned

for trial” and, if consolidation is found to be warranted, the consolidated case is

assigned to the docket in the lowest numbered case. D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. In this

matter, the lowest numbered case is Ressler, et al. v. United States, Civil Action No.

10-cv-03050-REB-BNB.2

 Although I am the district judge assigned to both cases,

resolution of the motion for consolidation must be decided in the lowest numbered case.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant United States of America’s

Motion To Consolidate Case and Certificate of Compliance With D.C.COLO.LCivR

7.1 [#9], filed September 8, 2011, is DENIED.

Dated September 9, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02253-REB-BNB Document 10 Filed 09/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Bert John Allen, III

v. Case No. 05-cv-109-PB

American Federation of

Government Employees

AFL-CIO, et al.

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: Document No. 49, Defendants’ Opposition to 

Plaintiff’s Motion for de novo Review with 

Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 42)

Ruling: All pending motions are denied without prejudice.

Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss for lack of venue and a

motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

These motions shall be filed on or before July 8, 2005. Plaintiff

shall file objections to the motions on or before July 27, 2005.

Discovery shall be stayed and no further motions shall be filed

until further order of the court. 

Entered by: Paul Barbadoro, District Judge

Date: June 29, 2005

cc: Bert John Allen, III

Mary T. Sullivan, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00109-PB Document 60 Filed 06/29/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF
      SPAN-AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief accounting officer of
Span-America Medical Systems, Inc., certify that the amendment to the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 27, 2003, which accompanies
this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in the amendment fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Span-America
Medical Systems, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350) and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person
shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.

By:

/s/      James D. Ferguson
--------------------------------------------------
James D. Ferguson
President and Chief Executive Officer, Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.


/s/      Richard C. Coggins
---------------------------------------------------
Richard C. Coggins
Chief Financial Officer, Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.
(Chief Accounting Officer)

Date:  May 11, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1


                        International Electronics, Inc.
                   Calculation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                    Year Ended August 31
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 1996       1995       1994
                                                 ----       ----       ----
<S>                                         <C>         <C>         <C>
 
PRIMARY NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
-----------------------------------
 
Weighted average common and
equivalent shares:
 
Common stock                                 1,451,609  1,413,981    1,401,078
 
Common equivalent shares
resulting from dilutive stock
options and warrants (treasury
stock method using the average
market price)                                  207,746       -            -
                                            ----------  ---------   ----------
Total                                        1,659,355  1,413,981    1,401,078
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
Net income (loss)                           $  161,990  ($231,040)    ($48,928)
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
Net income (loss)
per share                                   $      .10      ($.16)       ($.03)
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
 
FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
-----------------------------------------

Weighted average common and
equivalent shares:
 
Common stock                                 1,451,609  1,413,981    1,401,078
 
Common equivalent shares
resulting from dilutive stock
options and warrants (treasury
stock method using the higher
of the ending or average
market price)                                  207,746       -            -
                                            ----------  ---------   ----------
Total                                        1,659,355  1,413,981    1,401,078
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
Net income (loss)                           $  161,990  ($231,040)    ($48,928)
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
Net income (loss)
per share                                   $      .10      ($.16)       ($.03)
                                            ==========  =========   ==========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2199 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                     December 11, 2001.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
2199) entitled ``An Act to amend the National Capital Revitalization 
and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal law 
enforcement agency to enter into a cooperative agreement with the 
Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia to assist 
the Department in carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement 
activities in the District of Columbia if deemed appropriate by the 
Chief of the Department and the United States Attorney for the District 
of Columbia, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 2, line 13, strike out [sec. 4-192(d)] and insert: sec. 5-
133.17(d)

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2199

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1057

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain segments 
  of the New River in the States of North Carolina and Virginia as a 
        component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2007

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain segments 
  of the New River in the States of North Carolina and Virginia as a 
        component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New River Wild and Scenic River Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. NEW RIVER, VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 
U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(170) New river, virginia and north carolina.--The 
        segment downstream from the segment of the New River designated 
        as a component of the Wild and Scenic River System before the 
        date of enactment of this paragraph, from the border between 
        Virginia and North Carolina to approximately 2 miles east of 
        Highway 221 at the border between Virginia and North Carolina, 
        to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as a scenic 
        river.''.
    (b) Applicable Law.--Notwithstanding any provision of law, any 
private land in the authorized boundaries of the segments of the New 
River designated as a component of the Wild and Scenic River System by 
section 3(a)(170) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 
1274(a)(170)) shall continue to be regulated after the date of 
enactment of this Act in accordance with State and local planning and 
zoning laws.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56854-56855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of the Secretary


Privacy Act of 1974; Retirement of System of Records

AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of the retirement of two Privacy Act system of records 
notices.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Department of 
Homeland Security is giving notice that it proposes to retire the 
following Privacy Act system of records notice Treasury/CS.190 
Personnel Case File (66 FR 52984 October 18, 2001) and partially retire 
sections of USSS.002 Chief Counsel Record System (66 FR 45362 August 
28, 2001) relating to equal employment opportunities from its inventory 
of record systems and rely upon the Government-wide system of records 
notice issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC/
GOVT-1 (67 FR 49338 July 30, 2002), which is written to cover all 
Federal equal employment opportunity programs.

DATES: These changes will take effect on October 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy 
Officer, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528, by 
telephone (703) 235-0780 or facsimile (703) 235-0442.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy 
Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and as part of its ongoing integration and 
management efforts, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is 
retiring the system of records notice, Treasury/CS.190 Personnel Case 
File (66 FR 52984 October 18, 2001), and partially retire USSS.002 
Chief Counsel Record System (66 FR 45362 August 28, 2001), that were 
issued by the Department of Treasury prior to the creation of the 
Department of Homeland Security.
    DHS will continue to collect and maintain records regarding 
employees who file a grievance or complaint and/or whom disciplinary 
action has been proposed or taken under the equal opportunity program 
and will rely upon the existing Federal Government-wide system of 
records titled EEOC/GOVT-1 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (67 
FR 49338 July 30, 2002), which is written to cover all Federal equal 
employment opportunity programs.
    Eliminating this notice will have no adverse impacts on 
individuals, but will promote the overall streamlining and

[[Page 56855]]

management of DHS Privacy Act record systems.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8-23001 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P
**Exhibit 10.1.4**

**Exhibit ASCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTSAND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES**

 
| **Date Admitted** | ** ** | **Name and address of partners**           | ** ** | **Value of  non-cash  intercompany  advance** | ** ** | **Partnership  units issued** | ** ** | **Approx.  Percentage  Interests** | ** ** | **Federal ID #** |
|------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
| 02/04/1997             |       | GTA LP, Inc. 14 North Adger’s Wharf Charleston, SC  29401 |       | $                                                  |       | 7,302,479                          |       | 99.31                              | %          | 58-2290326                 |
| 02/04/1997             |       | GTA GP, Inc. 14 North Adger’s Wharf Charleston, SC  29401 |       | $                                                  |       | 14,684                             |       | 0.20                               | %          | 58-2290217                 |
| Total Common OP Units  |       |                                                           |       |                                               |       | 7,317,163                          |       | 100.00                             | %          |                       |
|                   |       | GTA LP, Inc. 10 North Adger’s Wharf Charleston, SC  29401 |       | $                                                  | 20,000,000 |                               | 800,000    |                               | 100        | %                          |   |
|                        |            |                                                                |            |                                                    |            |                                    |            |                                    |            |                            |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statements of Income and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                        220,640
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 569,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                89,206,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           92,498,135 
<PP&E>                                     55,400,236
<DEPRECIATION>                             14,812,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            134,697,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      36,903,909
<BONDS>                                     1,733,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       73,917
<OTHER-SE>                                 52,113,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              134,697,756
<SALES>                                   104,611,023 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          104,611,023
<CGS>                                      68,505,980         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              34,790,268 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,693,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (379,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (151,669)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (227,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                (227,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.03)
        

</TABLE>