alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Genomic Sequencing Centers for Infectious Diseases.                     

*Date:*                         October 23, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                     

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn-Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue-Name Change to Crowne Plaza, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Annie Walker-Abbey, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, RM 3266, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2671,                         *aabbey@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, lmmunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E8-23050 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.16



                               AGREEMENT TO EXTEND
                          EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


             THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREE to extend the Executive Employment
   Agreement, dated November 1, 1998, between them (as later amended and
   extended, the "Agreement"), until the later of October 31, 2000 or one
   year after the ocurrence of a Change in Control of the Company (as defined
   in the Agreement), in the event of a Change in Control of the Company shall
   have occurred on or prior to October 31, 2000.

             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument
   as of the 31st day of October, 1997.




                                      TBC CORPORATION


                                      By /s/ Louis S. DiPasqua

                                         Louis S. DiPasqua,
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer



                                         /s/ Ronald E. McCollough

                                         RONALD E. McCOLLOUGH








                                      -52-
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LIBERTY NATIONAL SURETY, INC. ) d/b/a LIBERTY BAIL BONDS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2743 ) SUNTRUST BANK, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 30, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge. James E. Moon of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Robert J. Lindeman of Marcadis Singer P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
H. Res. 974 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the State of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3521) to improve the Operating Fund for public housing of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order 

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 

Services now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 
2 

•HRES 974 EH 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 

XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 

order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 

designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 

debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 

or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the 

House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 

Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3 

•HRES 974 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3521 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

SEC. 3. House Resolution 955 is laid upon the table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. 

Naperville, Illinois 

 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Factory Card &Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of October 30, 2004, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003, and of cashflows for the nine-month periods ended October 30, 2004 and November 1, 2003. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made tosuch condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidatedbalance sheet of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary as of January 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the 52 weeks ended January 31, 2004 (not presentedherein); and in our report dated April 5, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of fresh-start accounting. In our opinion, the informationset forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

December 2, 2004 

 

27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,091,224
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,770,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        620,863
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,488,467
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,165,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             34,430
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,792,290
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,496,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               9,488,467
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,750
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               179,279
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               182,029
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,084
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,075
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          172,954
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                333,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (163,551)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (163,551)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (163,551)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.91
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Dress Barn, Inc.
Suffern, New York



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-17488,  33-47415,  33-60196 and 333-18135 on Form S-8 of The Dress Barn, Inc.
of our report dated  October 10, 2003,  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form
10-K of The Dress Barn, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended July 26, 2003.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
October 17, 2003
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/s/ Louise M.
Bonvechio


Louise M.
Bonvechio, Vice President & CFO





March 26,
2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending December 11, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITIZENS NATIONAL CORPORATION                                                                                           * 3A3Citizens National Corporation, Wisner, Nebraska to acquire up to an additional 2 percent for a total of 34.33 percent of the voting shares of Republic Corporation, parent of United Republic Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/12/2011FIRST STATE BANK OF COLORADO                                                                                            * BranchFirst State Bank of Colorado, Hotchkiss, Colorado, to establish a branch at 564 Main Street, Delta, Colorado.Newspaper: 12/09/2010Federal Register: Not applicableFRONTIER HOLDINGS, LLC                                                                                                  * 3A3Frontier Holdings, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of ARSEBECO, Inc., parent of Richardson County Bank & Trust Company, both in Falls City, Nebraska. Frontier Management, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, to acquire indirect control of 100 percent of the voting shares of ARSEBECO, Inc., parent of Richardson County Bank & Trust Company, both in Falls City, Nebraska, by virtue of its control of the affairs of Frontier Holdings, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska.Newspaper: 12/25/2010Federal Register: 01/07/2011NORCON FINANCIAL CORP.                                                                                                  CICNotice submitted by Jeffrey J. Heiman and Jerod J. Heiman, both of Wichita, Kansas, to retain control of Norcon Financial Corp., parent of Conway Bank, National Association, both in Conway Springs, Kansas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REINA RAFAELA ZET, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-71844 Agency No. A073-914-645
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 2, 2011 ** Pasadena, California Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. Reina Rafaela Zet, native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying her motion to reopen proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS , 321 

# FILED
MAY 04 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS-2- F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Zet’s motion to reopen because it was filed more than ninety da ys after the BIA’s final deportation order,
see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Zet has not identified any exceptions to the ninety-day time limitation that apply, see id. §1003.2(c)(3). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen deportation proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See Ekimian v. INS , 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002) (noting that “the decision of the BIA whether to invoke its sua spont e authority is committed to its unfettered discretion”) (emphasis omitted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof World Heart Corporation (the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, David Pellone, Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to his knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation as of March 31, 2008.

 
| Dated:  May 15,  2008 | /s/ *David Pellone                           |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                            | David Pellone, Vice President, Finance       |
|                            | and Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----

*******                **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS

ANETT HARP,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH

INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer filed on March 9, 2012 [Docket No. 25]. The

Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within

fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The

Recommendation was served on March 9, 2012. No party has objected to the

Recommendation. 

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s

recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927

F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)

(“[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a

magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when

neither party objects to those findings”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the

Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 26 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous or contrary 1

to law” standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo

review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

2

Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.”1

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has

concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 25] is

ACCEPTED. 

2. Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Title VII Complaint [Docket

No. 20] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claim for discrimination based on her alleged disability

is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

DATED May 23, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 26 Filed 05/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Karston KEELEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shannon DEMAR, and cell entry team; Unknown Health Care Provider; Unknown Medical Center; Unknown Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-30125.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 2003.

Before REAVLEY, JONES and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Karston Keelen appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to properly exhaust his prison remedies. A pending administrative grievance is not considered exhausted, *See Wendell v. Asher,*162 F.3d 887, 890 (5th Cir.1998), and Keelen has failed to show that the exhaustion requirement should be excused. Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing Keeleris lawsuit, and the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.