alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 1448 Texas Ave., Texas City, TX 77590, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 26, 2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-1060. 

Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E8-2300 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 871 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 871

 Opposing the United States Sentencing Commission's decision to reduce 
                        crack cocaine sentences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2007

 Mr. Graves submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Opposing the United States Sentencing Commission's decision to reduce 
                        crack cocaine sentences.

Whereas 36,000 to 37,000 Federal prison inmates are serving time for crack-
        related crimes;
Whereas 10 percent of criminals convicted of crack cocaine charges could be 
        released by March 3, 2008;
Whereas 23 percent of criminals convicted of crack cocaine charges could be 
        released in the next year;
Whereas nearly half of criminals convicted of crack cocaine charges could be 
        released by the end of 2010; and
Whereas two of three eligible inmates could be freed from prison by 2012: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) disagrees with the United States Sentencing 
        Commission's decision to reduce crack cocaine sentences;
            (2) opposes attempts to release felons back into the 
        streets prematurely before their sentence expires;
            (3) recognizes that a sweeping mandate to reduce sentences 
        is not in the best interest of society; and
            (4) will remain vigilant against drug abusers of all kind.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable Mark W. Be nnett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Paul A. Zoss, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1097

___________ Lula M. Lewis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Michael J. Astrue, * Commissioner of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 2010 Filed: January 8, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lulu M. Lewis appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. Following ourde novo review of the record, we reject Lewis’s assertions of error and find that the administrative law judge’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Davidson v. Astrue ,-2- 578 F.3d 838, 841-42 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### Louis Gordon, Plaintiff, *v.*580 Equities, Inc., Defendant.

City Court of the City of New York, Special Term, Bronx County,

January 21, 1957.

*Abraham Abramowitz*for defendant.

*David S. Elgot*for plaintiff.

Nathan A. Lashin, J.

This is an application by the defendant for a discovery and inspection of certain items of personal property alleged to have been damaged by water through the negligence of the defendant. The power to compel a discovery is very broad and rests upon the sound discretion of the court “ as justice requires”. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 141.) The subject matter may include any article or property relating to the merits of the action, or of the defense therein. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 324.) Prior to the enactment of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act, discovery was limited to books, documents and other papers. (See Code Civ. Pro., § 803.) The contention of the plaintiff that the amount of damages has no relation to the merits of the defense is untenable. It is part of the defendant’s defense to refute the damages claimed by the plaintiff. Such defense need not necessarily be an affirmative one. (See *Iroquois Hotel & Apt. Co.*v. *Iroquois Realty Co.,*126 App. Div. 814; *Miller*v. *New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*14 N. Y. S.’ 2d, 129.) Certainly if a party is required to submit his person for physical examination pursuant to section 306 of the Civil Practice Act, then what sanctity does an inanimate object possess so as to preclude an inspection. The modern trend is to encourage inspections and to afford the statutes a liberal construction. In *331this manner the trial of actions may be expedited and justice more speedily administered. The court is concerned only with ascertaining the truth of the claim alleged by the plaintiff and to this end the source of the truth should be made available to the defendant as well as the court. *Accordingly*this motion is granted. The plaintiff is directed to permit the defendant to discover, inspect and take photographs of the items of personal property which form the subject matter of this action. I see no necessity for the appointment of a referee. The inspection shall proceed at a date convenient to both parties within 20 days after service of a copy of this order upon the attorney for the plaintiff.
**BOVIE
MEDICAL CORPORATION**
 **NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS**
 
 **CONSENT
OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT**
 
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this amended Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A of Bovie Medical Corporation of our report dated March 25, 2004, except
for the notes 1-6, 11 and 14-16 as to which the date is February 1, 2005, for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
  
  Bloom and
Company LLP
 /S/Bloom
and Company
 Hempstead,
New York
 March 25,
2004 except
 for the
notes 1-6, 11 and 14-16
 as to
which the date is February 1, 2005.
Exhibit 3.5 EIGHTH AMENDMENTTO THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTOFCONSOLIDATED CAPITAL
INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2, LP This EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL
PROPERTIES/2, LP, dated as of December 30, 2008 (this "Amendment"), is
made by ConCap Equities, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "General
Partner"). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings given to them in the
Partnership Agreement (as defined below). WHEREAS, Consolidated Capital Institutional
Properties/2, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"),is governed pursuant to the terms of that certain
Limited Partnership Agreement of Consolidated Capital Institutional
Properties/2, dated as of April 12, 1983, as amended to date (the
"Partnership Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Section 22.13 of the Partnership Agreement
provides that the Series B Interests may be terminated upon a sale or other
disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of such series;
and WHEREAS, the General Partner has completed the sale of
all of the assets allocated to the Series B Interests and completed a winding up
of the affairs of such series; and WHEREAS, the General Partner
deems it advisable that the Partnership Agreement be amended toreflect the termination of the Series B
Interests. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and
of the mutual provisions, conditions and covenants herein contained, the parties
hereto do hereby agree as follows: Termination of Series B.The Series B Interests have been terminated. 2.Amendment to the Partnership
Agreement. The Partnership Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of a
new Section 22.14, which will read in its entirety as follows: "22.14 Termination of Series B Interests.
Effective as of the close of business on December 30, 2008, the Series B
Interests were terminated." 3.Miscellaneous. (a; Effect of Amendment. In the event of any
conflict or inconsistency between the terms of the Partnership Agreement and the
terms of this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail, and any
conflicting or inconsistent provisions shall be reconciled and construed to give
effect to the terms and intent of this Amendment. (b Ratification. Except as otherwise expressly
modified hereby, the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and all of the terms and provisions of the Partnership Agreement, as
herein modified, are hereby ratified and reaffirmed. Governing Law.THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED AND
ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING
EFFECT TO ITS PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW. [Remainderof page left intentionally
blank.]


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the General Partner has executed this Amendment as of the date
first


setforthabove.


CONCAP EQUITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation By:  /s/Brian J. Bornhorst Brian J.Bornhorst Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  343,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        243,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,201
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
|   **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Science, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Robert Melamede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1       

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/*Dr. Robert Melamede*Dr. Robert MelamedePresident and Chief Executive Officer

March 17, 2010

                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Harold W. Ungerleider, Judgment Creditor, *v.*Robert F. Butler, Judgment Debtor.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

June 5, 1952.

*William A. Butler*and *Vine E. Smith*for judgment debtor.

*Sidney Posner*and *Leo Auerbach*for Sheriff of City of New York, Kings County Division.

J. Vincent Keogh, J.

This is a motion by the judgment debtor for an order vacating a levy made by the Sheriff of the City of New York on July 21, 1950. Pursuant to such levy the interest of the judgment debtor in and to certain real property at 722 Church Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, was sold at public auction for $500 on or about January 23, 1951, after the judgment debtor had' been denied stays in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and in this court. The judgment debtor argues that the levy made by the sheriff was defective for the reason that the notice of levy failed to state, in accordance with the provisions of section 512 of the Civil Practice Act, the fact that the judgment debtor was an “ heir or devisee ” and the owner of only a one-sixth interest in the real property levied.upon. This contention is untenable. *426The expression “ heir or devisee ” as used in section 512 means the ‘ ‘ heir or devisee ’ ’ of the judgment debtor and not an heir or devisee in general. This is the purport of the language of the statute. The intent of the statute is to provide a mode by which a judgment creditor may proceed against the real property of a judgment debtor after the lapse of 10 years, to the end that the judgment creditor may bind and reach the property of the judgment debtor, and in case of his death, such property in the hands of his heir or devisee. It appears, therefore, that the interest of the present judgment debtor in the above-mentioned real property was not that of an “ heir or devisee ’ ’ within the meaning of section 512 of the Civil Practice Act and consequently it was not necessary to state his specific interest in the property in the notice of levy *(Rondout Nat. Bank*v. *Shappee,*192 Misc. 727).

Accordingly, the judgment debtor’s application is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         771,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               771,286
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 771,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     756,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   771,286
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,346
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,441)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,441)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (224.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (224.41)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS is per 1% Beneficiary Interest
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of New generation  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Jacques Mot
------------------------
Jacques Mot
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

May 23, 2005
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending April 2, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAMBANK HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                                                   CICNotice by Venkateswararao Alla, Rock Island, Illinois, individually and as trustee of the Revocable Trust Agreements known as: Atlantic Financial Holdings I Trust, the Atlantic Financial Holdings II Trust, the Atlantic Financial Holdings III Trust, and the Atlantic Financial Holdings IV Trust, all of Rock Island, Illinois; and acting in concert with Rajesh Alla, Rock Island, Illinois, Rakesh Alla, Rock Island, Illinois, and Suresh Alla, Moline, Illinois; for approval to increase and retain control of more than 25 percent of the voting shares of Ambank Holdings, Inc., Davenport, Iowa, and thereby indirectly control American Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Davenport, Iowa, pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act.Newspaper: 04/07/2016Federal Register: 04/01/2016BLACKHAWK BANCORPORATION, INC.                                                                                          * 3A5Blackhawk Bancorporation, Inc., Milan, Illinois, to merge with First Port Byron Bancorp, Inc. and thereby indirectly acquire Port Byron State Bank, both of Port Byron, Illinois.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableBOSCOBEL BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                  * 3A5