alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ZAP (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven M. Schneider, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Steven M. Schneider
              Steven
      M. SchneiderTitle:  Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date:
      May 20, 2009








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
**Exhibit 10.76**

**APPENDIX A**

**Singapore**

MSC.Software Corporation 2006 Performance Incentive Plan 

Nonqualified Stock OptionAgreement for Non-U.S. Employees 

**Securities Law Notice**

The grant of Options and the shares of Common Stock to be issued pursuant to the Options are being made on a private basis and are, therefore, exempt from registration in Singapore. 

**Director Notification**

If the Grantee is adirector, associate director or shadow director of a Singapore Subsidiary of the Corporation, the Grantee is subject to certain notification requirements under the Singapore Companies Act. Among these requirements is an obligation to notify theSingapore Subsidiary in writing when the Grantee receives an interest (*e.g.*, Options, shares of Common Stock) in the Corporation or any related companies. The Grantee should contact the Corporation to obtain a copy of the notification form.In addition, the Grantee must notify the Singapore Subsidiary when he or she sells shares of Common Stock of the Corporation or any related company (including when the Grantee sells shares of Common Stock acquired under the Plan). Thesenotifications must be made within two days of acquiring or disposing of any interest in the Corporation or any related company. In addition, a notification must be made of the Grantee’s interests in the Corporation or any related company withintwo days of becoming a director, associate director or shadow director.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O
. W R

- 8 4 , 8 8 9

- 0 1

E X P A R T E M I C H A E L H A R O L D B A R N E S , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O
. D

- 4 1 , 2 3 6 I N T H E 3 5 8 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M E C T O R C O U N T Y

Y E A R Y , J
. , f

i l e d a c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n i n w h i c h K E A S L E R , a n d H E R V E Y , J J
. , j o i n e d
.
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

A d h e r i n g t o t h e v i e w s e x p r e s s e d i n m y c o n c u r r i n g o p i n i o n i n E x p a r t e P o i n t e r ,

_ _ _ S

. W

. 3 d

_ _ _ , N o s
. W R

- 8 4 , 7 8 6

- 0 1 & W R

- 8 4 , 7 8 6

- 0 2 ( T e x
. C r i m
. A p p
. d e l

. J u n e 8 , 2 0 1 6 ) , I j o i n i n t h e C o u r t ’ s d i s p o s i t i o n o f t h i s c a s e
.

F I L E D : J u n e 2 9 , 2 0 1 6 D O N O T P U B L I S H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Judge Raymond P. Moore 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02306-RM-KLM 

LARRY D. FREDERICK, 

Plaintiff 

v. 

HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant 

 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE 

[REPLACING AND SUPERCEDING THE COURT’S JANUARY 15 ORDER (NO. 83)]

 

THE COURT, having reviewed the Joint Motion to Administratively Close Case, and 

being fully advised, HEREBY ORDERS: 

1. The Joint Motion is GRANTED; 

2. This case is administratively closed, effective as of today’s date; and 

3. Either party may move to reopen the case at any time for good cause; and 

4. If the Plaintiff does not seek to reopen this case within 30 days after the 

denial of certiorari or, if certiorari is granted, within 30 days after a 

decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in the Maxwell, et al. v. USAA, et 

al., District Court, Boulder, Colorado, Case No. 2006CV323 then Plaintiff 

agrees that the case shall be dismissed. 

DATED this 21st day of January, 2014. 

 BY THE COURT: 

____________________________________ 

RAYMOND P. MOORE 

United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 84 Filed 01/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.





|Name of Subsidiary                         | Jurisdiction of Organization
|------------------------------------------ | ----------------------------
|                                           |                             
|Pizza Inn, Inc.*                           | Missouri                    
|(d/b/a Pizza Inn)                          |                             
|                                           |                             
|Pie Five Pizza Company, Inc.*              | Texas                       
|(d/b/a Pie Five Pizza Company or Pie Five) |                             
|                                           |                             
|Pie Five Restaurants, Inc.*                | Texas                       
|                                           |                             
|PIBC Holding, Inc.*                        | Texas                       
|                                           |                             
|Pizza Inn Beverage Corp.*                  | Texas                       
|                                           |                             
|Pie Five Beverage Corp.*                   | Texas                       





* Does business under its corporate name
as well as any referenced assumed name.
Exhibit
23





BERRY
.. DUNN . MCNEIL & PARKER


BDMP





CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANTS














CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Community
Bancorp. of our report dated March 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in the 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of
Community Bancorp.





We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-127024) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment
Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-133631) pertaining to
the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated March 26,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated therein
by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2008.





/s/
Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker





Portland,
Maine


March 27,
2009


Vermont
Registration No. 92-0000278
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 16 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PERRY B. BEVERAGE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELTER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri Corporation; SHELTER GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri Corporation; SHELTER LIFE INSURANCE CO., a Missouri Corporation; and SHELTER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., a Missouri Corporation,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 97-6104 (D.C. No. 96-CV-471) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY, McKAY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Plaintiff Perry B. Beverage appeals from the distri ct court’s order granting defendants’ motion for sanctions for not providing discovery to defendants in a timely manner. The dispute turns on whether Mr. Be verage or his lawyer was responsible for the delay. The trial court held a hearing at which both Mr. Beverage and his counsel testified. The trial court determined counsel to be the more credible witness and imposed the sanctions on Mr. Beverage. We review the imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion, see Mobley v. McCormick , 40 F.3d 337, 340 (10th Cir. 1994), and defer to t he district court's evaluation of the credibility of witnesses, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a) (“due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses”). We cannot say the trial court’s credi bility determination was clearly erroneous or that its order imposing sanctions was an abuse of discretion. AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------




CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003, William Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of ZAP, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the nine months ended September 30, 2003,fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
     Securities Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the nine months
     ended September 30, 2003,fairly presents, in all material respects, the
     financial condition and results of operations of ZAP.



/s/  William Hartman
-----------------------
William Hartman
Chief Financial Officer


November 12, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1189 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 560
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1189

To designate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 
at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ``George Howard, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 23, 2007

Mr. Pryor (for himself and Mrs. Lincoln) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2008

               Reported by Mrs. Boxer, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 
at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ``George Howard, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE HOWARD, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States 
Courthouse, located at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, 
shall be known and designated as the ``George Howard, Jr. Federal 
Building and United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States Courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George Howard, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
                                                       Calendar No. 560

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1189

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States Courthouse located 
at 100 East 8th Avenue in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, as the ``George Howard, 
          Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

             January 22 (legislative day, January 3), 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Pompeo SANTULLO, Appellant, v. Antonieta SANTULLO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Feb. 26, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40315

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ANTONIO MARTINEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CR-1026-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Antonio 

Martinez-Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Hernandez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40315 Document: 00514280485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
No. 17-40315

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40315 Document: 00514280485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                                 LEASE AGREEMENT

                                                              LEASE NUMBER   106

                                                        DATE OF LEASE   09-01-97

LESSOR:     LESLIE RUDD INVESTMENT COMPANY
            314 South Galena Street
            Aspen, Colorado 81611
            303-925-5866

LESSEE:     Dean & Deluca Brands, Inc.          LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT
            560 Broadway                        2526 E. 36th St.
            New York, NY   10012                North Circle
            212-226-6800                        Wichita, KS 67219

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


TERM: 36 Months                       COMMENCEMENT DATE: 09-01-97


                             RENTAL PAYMENT SCHEDULE

$1,706.09 per month including sales and use tax for the first 36 months followed
by $541.94 per month including sales and use tax until the Lease Agreement is
terminated.


                                SECURITY DEPOSIT

$0 payable at time of signing of the Lease to be applied, if not used, to the
last 0 rental payments, plus sales and use tax, in the inverse order of their
respective maturities.


                              EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
                    (Model #, Serial #, or Other Description)
                  Hesston Business Interiors - Office Furniture
        All Office Furniture @ the 2526 E. 36th St. Location - Installed
        including but not limited to Desks, Chairs, Tables, File Cabinets

<PAGE>



                                LEASE NUMBER 106


                                 LEASE AGREEMENT

This Lease shall constitute an agreement of lease and nothing herein shall be
construed as conveying to Lessee any right, title, or interest in any of the
Equipment. The undersigned agree to all terms and conditions set forth above and
in witness thereof hereby execute this Lease.


                                 NAME OF LESSEE:
                           Dean & Deluca Brands, Inc.


SIGNED BY:  /s/ DANE J. NELLER
            ------------------------------------------------
            Dane J. Neller
            Chief Executive Officer                                     Seal

This Lease shall not become effective until accepted by Lessor.


                                 NAME OF LESSOR:
                         LESLIE RUDD INVESTMENT COMPANY

ACCEPTED DATE:  09-01-97

SIGNED BY:  /s/ JON BOWMAN
            ------------------------------------------------
            Jon Bowman
            Secretary

LESSEE'S SIGNATURE IN INK REQUIRED ON ORIGINAL LEASE AND LESSEE'S COPY.




                                       2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending March 18, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for the registered holders of ML-CFC Commercial

Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006-3,

Plaintiff,

v.

GLENWOOD HOSPITALITY, INC.;

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF ARKANSAS, LLC; and

NOBLE PROPERTIES OF COLORADO, LLC,

Defendants.

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS GERALD R. SPRONG 

AND W.A. COLIN NOBLE WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Claims Against Defendants Gerald R. Sprong and W.A. Colin Noble With Prejudice (Motion)

(#76) filed November 26, 2012. Having reviewed the Motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against

Defendants Gerald A. Sprong and W.A. Colin Noble are hereby dismissed with prejudice

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), with each party to pay his, her or its own attorney fees and

costs. The revised case caption above shall be used on all subsequent pleadings.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02386-MSK-KLM Document 78 Filed 11/27/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, No. 333-41077, No. 333-65995, No. 333-78941, No. 333-74244, and No. 333-105153 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated August 12, 2004 (April 11, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 3), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement as discussed in Note 3, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended May 29, 2004.

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

April 11, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 CERTIFICATION

I, Jacques Mot , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Generation
Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

<PAGE>

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.






/s/ Jacques Mot
---------------------------
Jacques Mot
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 11, 2006
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending March 24, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE