alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1162 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1162

   To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act with 
 respect to the labeling of cigarette packages, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2007

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act with 
 respect to the labeling of cigarette packages, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cigarette Litter Prevention Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED STATEMENT ON CIGARETTE PACKAGES.

    Section 4(a) of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act 
(15 U.S.C. 1333(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to 
        manufacture, package, or import for sale or distribution within 
        the United States any cigarettes the package of which fails to 
        bear, in accordance with the regulations promulgated by the 
        Secretary under subparagraph (B), the following statement: 
        `Please dispose of all cigarette waste properly. Do not 
        litter.'.
            ``(B) Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
        of the Cigarette Litter Prevention Act of 2007, the Secretary 
        shall promulgate regulations with respect to the placement, 
        format, and type style of the label statement required under 
        subparagraph (A).''.
                                 <all>
```
|   **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Onshore, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Cowen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1    

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: */s/ Richard Cowen*Richard CowenChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer

November 22, 2010                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E.

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00369-REB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ADRIAN RAMIREZ-CENTENO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

On December 9, 2011, the court conducted a telephonic setting conference with

government’s counsel appearing by telephone and defense counsel appearing in

chambers. After conferring with the parties and with their consent,

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That on January 5, 2012, commencing at 9:00 a.m., the court shall conduct a

joint change of plea in this matter with Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00205-REB, USA v.

Sieving; and

2. That, to the extent necessary, the United States Marshal for the District of

Colorado shall assist the court in securing the defendant’s appearance for this hearing. 

Dated: December 9, 2011
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                     EVENFLO & SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION



                Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
       State of Delaware, Evenflo & Spalding Holdings Corporation, a corporation
       organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the
       "Company"), does hereby certify:

                The provisions of Article First of the Company's Certificate of
                Incorporation shall be amended to read as follows:

                  "FIRST: The name of the Company is Spalding Holdings
                  Corporation."

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to
       be signed by Paul L. Whiting, its Chief Executive Officer, and attested
       by Robert K. Adikes, its Secretary, this 1st day of September, 1998.


                                 EVENFLO & SPALDING HOLDINGS CORPORATION


                                 By       /s/ Paul L. Whiting
                                          Chief Executive Officer



       (SEAL)



       Attest:


         /S/ Robert K. Adikes
                Secretary


                                       23
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 16


                    [MOORE STEPHENS DOEREN MAYHEW LETTERHEAD]



                                 March 19, 2003




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE:      Integral Vision, Inc.

Gentlemen:

We have read the statements that we understand Integral Vision, Inc. will
include under Item 4 of the Form 8-K report it will file regarding the recent
change of auditors. We agree with such statements made regarding our firm. We
have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements made under Item 4.


                                                    Very truly yours,



                                                    MOORE STEPHENS DOEREN MAYHEW
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Heritage Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John O. Guthrie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 25, 2009 |  | /s/ John O. Guthrie    
|                     |  | John O. Guthrie,       
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer



80
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Monty A. Houdeshell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    James E. RiesenbachJames E. Riesenbach Chief Executive Officer August 9, 2007




/s/    Monty A. HoudeshellMonty A. Houdeshell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 9, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iGateCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |        |
| /s/ MICHAEL ZUGAY                         |   |
|                                                |   |
| Michael Zugay                                  |   |
| Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |   |

August 13, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to iGate Corporation and will be retained by iGate Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

30
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1188

JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIZIO, INC.; SELF STORAGE PLUS; HOMELAND SECURITY; MARK DOE, 

DC Police Officer; PAUL DOE, Police Officer; NATE DOE, DC Police Officer; 

KAREN DOE, DC Police Officer; CHIEF ROBERT CONTEE, D.C. Chief of 

Police; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF THE MAYOR; 

OFFICE OF POLICE COMPLAINTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:22-cv-00462-GJH)

Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 28, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Alan Sampson, SAUL EWING LLP, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Vizio, Inc. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1188 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jibril Luqman Ibrahim appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Vizio, 

Inc.’s motion to dismiss and dismissing as frivolous Ibrahim’s complaint as to all 

defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ibrahim’s informal brief 

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1188 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Nathan Weiss, Petitioner, against Samnat Pacific Corp. et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

January 24, 1957.

*Berler & Goldstein*for petitioner.

*Herbst & Herbst*for respondents.

Walter R. Hart, J.

Petitioner in this article 78 proceeding seeks an order directing the respondent corporations to permit him to inspect the corporate books and records set forth in the order to show cause.

The technical objection raised, that the proceeding was improperly instituted as personal service was not made upon an officer of the respondent corporations but made upon the Secretary of State, is untenable. Sections 5 and 24 of the Stock Corporation Law specifically provide that upon the formation *502of a business corporation or where the corporation was formed prior to January 1, 1935, that the Secretary of State be designated as the agent of the corporation upon whom process in any action or proceeding may be served. Section 25 of the Stock Corporation Law provides for the manner of service. Subdivision 9 of section 228 of the Civil Practice Act, relating to personal service of a summons upon a domestic corporation, provides that the service may be made pursuant to the provisions of the Stock Corporation Law. The presumption that the respondents were incorporated pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the Stock Corporation Law has not been overcome by any proof submitted by the respondents and, accordingly, the service was proper.

The petitioner being a director of all the respondent corporations, he has an absolute and unqualified right to such inspection. *(Matter of Cohen*v. *Cocoline Prods.,*309 N. Y. 119; *Smith*v. *Republic Pictures Corp.,*144 N. Y. S. 2d 142, affd. 286 App. Div. 1000, motion for leave to appeal denied 286 App. Div. 1089.) Under the circumstances, the motion is granted. Settle order on notice.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 96

   Supporting the establishment and full funding of a staff exchange 
  program between the House of Representatives and the Parliament of 
           Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, as soon as possible.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2007

 Ms. Kaptur submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the establishment and full funding of a staff exchange 
  program between the House of Representatives and the Parliament of 
           Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, as soon as possible.

Whereas supporters of democracy worldwide recognize the valor of the people of 
        Ukraine in seeking to advance democratic governance in their country;
Whereas the role of the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada, is essential 
        to ensuring democratic governance and a balance of power among the 
        branches of the Government of Ukraine;
Whereas the people of the United States affirm the positive role being played by 
        the Parliament of Ukraine in averting a constitutional crisis in that 
        transitional republic;
Whereas on November 30, 1999, the Speaker of the House of Representatives signed 
        an agreement with the leaders of the Parliament of Ukraine to establish 
        an interparliamentary exchange program between the two legislative 
        bodies;
Whereas Members of the House of Representatives and the Parliament of Ukraine 
        have already participated in video teleconferences as part of this 
        agreement; and
Whereas the House of Representatives has commended these historic efforts and 
        expressed its desire and willingness to build on the success of this 
        agreement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives supports the 
establishment and full funding of a staff exchange program between the 
House of Representatives and the Parliament of Ukraine, the Verkhovna 
Rada, as soon as possible.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

INGRAM HARPER , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 259

[ April 12, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 11968CF10A

.
Ingram Harper, Pahokee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , T AYLOR , and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Form 10-Q

|   | (1) | To my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| /s/ Mark Klok      |
| Mark Klok               |
| Chief Executive Officer |
H. Res. 907 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 6, 2008. 

Whereas the United States is heavily dependent on foreign 

sources of oil that are concentrated in tumultuous countries and regions; 

Whereas the national security and economic prosperity of the 

United States demand that we move toward a sustainable 

energy future; 

Whereas the ability of foreign governments to assert great 

control over oil production allows unfriendly regimes to 

use energy exports as leverage against the United States 

and our allies; 

Whereas continued reliance on the use of greenhouse gas intensive fuels may impact global climate change; 

Whereas the automotive sector is heavily dependent on oil, 

which makes Americans vulnerable to oil price fluctuation 

and is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions; 

Whereas average fuel economy in the United States has increased slowly during the last 20 years; 

Whereas many promising technologies exist that can lead to 

a breakthrough vehicle that will meet the need for sustainable transportation; 
2 

•HRES 907 EH 

Whereas breakthroughs are often achieved by the free market 

fueling the entrepreneurial spirit of inventors and investors; 

Whereas the Automotive X PRIZE is a private, independent, 

technology-neutral competition being developed by the X 

PRIZE Foundation to inspire a new generation of viable, 

super-efficient vehicles that help break our addiction to 

oil and stem the effects of climate change; 

Whereas the Automotive X PRIZE will award a multimillion 

dollar reward to teams that can design, build, and demonstrate production-capable vehicles that achieve 100 

MPG or its equivalent; and 

Whereas such prize competitions generate involvement and 

innovation across a broad spectrum of known and untapped talent such as the $25,000 Orteig Prize won by 

Charles Lindbergh which leveraged $400,000 worth of 

additional research by teams trying to win the prize and 

spurred a $250,000,000,000 aviation industry, and the 

$10,000,000 Ansari X Prize which leveraged 

$100,000,000 worth of additional research: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the X PRIZE Foundation’s leadership for inspiring a new generation of viable, super-efficient vehicles that help break our addiction to oil 

through the Automotive X PRIZE competition; 

(2) congratulates the X PRIZE Foundation on 

their innovation and vision to bring together some of the 

finest minds in the public and private sectors, including 
3 

•HRES 907 EH 

government, academia, and industry, to advise and participate in the Automotive X PRIZE competition; and 

(3) applauds the X PRIZE Foundation’s ongoing 

commitment to find solutions to some of humanity’s 

greatest challenges as exemplified in the Automotive X 

PRIZE. 

Attest: 

Clerk.