## CASE NO. 07-15-00266-CV IN THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AT AMARILLO, TEXAS
***************************************** CITY OF GLEN ROSE, TEXAS and THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GLEN ROSE, TEXAS, Appellants, v. ERNEST and SHIRLEY REINKE, Appellees. ***************************************** Appeal from Cause No. C10381 in the 249th Judicial District of Somervell County, the Honorable William Bosworth, Presiding ***************************************** APPELLANTS’ FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF ***************************************** Fredrick “Fritz” Quast fquast@toase.com Texas Bar No. 24032974 Wayne K. Olson wolson@toase.com Texas Bar No. 15276900 Ashley D. Dierker adierker@toase.com Texas Bar No. 24065399 Members of the Law Firm of: Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. 6000 Western Place, Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Telephone No.: (817) 332-2580 Fax No.: (817) 332-4740 Brady Pendleton Glen Rose City Attorney brady@pendletonlawoffices.com Law Offices of Bradley L. Pendleton P.O. Box 483 Stephenville, Texas 76401 Telephone No.: (254) 965-4000 Fax No.: (817) 887-3196

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ACCEPTED 07-15-00266-cv SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/17/2015 2:56:44 PM Vivian Long, Clerk

## CASE NO. 07-15-00266-CV IN THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AT AMARILLO, TEXAS
***************************************** CITY OF GLEN ROSE, TEXAS and THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GLEN ROSE, TEXAS, Appellants, v. ERNEST AND SHIRLEY REINKE, Appellees. ***************************************** APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF ***************************************** TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS: Now comes the City of Glen Rose, Texas, and The Board of Adjustment of the City of Glen Rose, Texas (collectively, A ppellants), Appellants be fore this Court and defendants in the trial court. Appellants move this Court for an order extending time to file their brief. Appellants will show the following in support of this motion: 1. Background Facts The clerk’s record was filed August 19, 2015. 2. The Extension Requested If no extension is granted by this Court, the Appellants’ opening brief is due on Monday, September 21, 2015 . Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(c). Appellants seek an extension of time for a period of fourteen (14) days, until and including Monday,

1October 5, 2015 . This case is not accelerated and has not yet been set for submission. 3. Grounds for Extension A reasonable explanation and good cause for the need for more time to file the brief exists. Since the date the clerk’s record was file d, the undersigned counsel has been occupied with numerous other matters, including: (1) On September 22, 2015, the case of City of Carrollton v. Milan Hamrla, et al. , Case No. 02-15-00119-CV, is set for submission with oral argument to the Second Court of Appeals. The undersigned counsel represents the City of Carrollton and is preparing for argument in that case. The record is ex tensive (over 3,600 pages in clerk’s record and a five-volume reporter’s record). (2) The undersigned counsel is city atto rney for a city that has placed two of its most senior officials on administrative leave pending an investigation this summer. Late August and early September are important to the budget adoption, property ta x rate adoption, and the November election cycle for cities, and the undersigne d has been busy assisting interim officials with these and related tasks. (3) The undersigned counsel represents the Town of Annetta South in the case of Town of Annetta South, et al. v. Seadrift Development, L.P ., Case No. 14-1052 before the Texas Suprem e Court. Although review has not

2been granted, on September 4, 2015, the supreme court requested full briefing on the merits, with AnnettaSouth’s brief due on October 4, 2015. The undersigned has begun preparing the brief. No other attorney in counsel’s firm ha s had sufficient time, appellate expertise and familiarity with this case to prepare the brief. Finally, this is the first extension sought by the undersigned counsel in this case. The requested extension will not unduly delay this case. The extension is not sought for purposes of delay, but so that justice may be done. 4. Verification Verification of this motion is not required pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because the f acts in support of this motion are either within the appellate record, or are within the personal knowledge of the undersigned counsel. Tex. R. App. P. 10.2. REQUEST FOR RELIEF For the reasons stated, Appellants request this Court enter an order granting the requested extension of time. Appellants seek an extension of time for a period of fourteen (14) days, until and including Monday, October 5, 2015

.

3Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast Fredrick “Fritz” Quast fquast@toase.com Texas Bar No. 24032974 Wayne K. Olson wolson@toase.com Texas Bar No. 15276900 Ashley D. Dierker adierker@toase.com Texas Bar No. 24065399 Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P. 6000 Western Place, Suite 200 Fort Worth , Texas 76107 (817) 332-2580 - Telephone (817) 332-4740 - Fax Brady Pendleton Glen Rose City Attorney brady@pendletonlawoffices.com Law Offices of Brady L. Pendleton P.O. Box 483 Stephenville, Texas 76401 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS

4CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE A conference was held on the merits of this motion on September 17, 2015, between the counsel for Appellees, Stuart V. Neal, and the undersigned counsel for Appellant. This motion is not opposed. /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast Fredrick “Fritz” Quast

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A true and correct copy of the above and foregoing motion has been served through the electronic service provider pursuant to Rule 9.5(b) on this day, September 17, 2015, to the following counsel for Appellees: Stuart V. Neal snealattorney@hotmail.com 201 East Bridge Street Granbury, Texas 76048 Phone : (817) 573-9980 Fax: (817) 579-6280 Attorney for Appellees /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast Fredrick “Fritz” Quast

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Rule 9.4(3) of the Te xas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned authority hereby certifies that according to the word processing software used to prepare this filing, the word count of this document is 531. /s/ Fredrick “Fritz” Quast Fredrick “Fritz” Quast

5