alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS.

# SUMMARY:

The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the Notice of Intent published on August 10, 2007 to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed Interstate type facility connecting I-55 with I-20 through Hinds and Madison counties is being rescinded. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cecil Vick, Environment and Planning Management Team Leader, Federal Highway Administration, Mississippi Division, 666 North Street, Suite 105, Jackson, Mississippi 39202, Telephone: (601) 965-4217. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

## Background 

The FHWA is rescinding the notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which was to study potential improvements to the existing State Route 22 (SR 22) corridor. This 40-mile long corridor was proposed to be upgraded to Interstate standards with logical termini on Interstate 55 in Madison County and I-20 in Hinds County, Mississippi. 

The purpose of the EIS was to address the transportation, environmental, and safety issues of such a transportation corridor. The improved connection would improve mobility and access throughout the Jackson metropolitan area and support economic activity. The highway was proposed as a full control of access facility, and appropriate interchanges will be studied at various locations. 

During the first round of public meetings, it was determined that the public was unanimous in their opposition to this project. In addition, there is no funding available for the construction. 

Andrew H. Hughes, 

Division Administrator, Mississippi, Federal Highway Administration, Jackson, Mississippi. 

[FR Doc. E8-23124 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending December 4, 2021

----

Forms            Forms -- (1) initial Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping Requirements of Regulation H and Regulation K Associated with the Procedures for Monitoring Bank Secrecy Act Compliance (FR K) and Reporting Provisions Associated with Regulation TT (FR TT); (2) final Board review to extend with revision the Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Regulation W (FR W); and (3) final Board review to extend without revision the Registration of a Securities Holding Company (FR 2082) and Recordkeeping Provisions Associated with the Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies (FR 4027).            -Approved, December 3, 2021                        Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9C, FR Y-9LP, FR Y-9SP, FR Y-9ES, and FR Y-9CS).            -Approved, December 3, 2021            Personnel            Division of Monetary Affairs -- appointment of Mark Carlson as adviser, Discount Window and Federal Reserve Liquidity Programs.            -Approved, December 3, 2021            Reserve Bank Operations            Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland -- appointment of Mark S. Meder as first vice president and chief operating officer.            -Approved, November 21, 2021            (A/C)          Reserve Bank Services            Federal Reserve Priced Services -- 2022 private-sector adjustment factor and fee schedules for priced services and electronic access.            -Approved, November 28, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1901 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1901

  To modify the manner in which the wage index adjustment to payments 
under the Medicare Program to hospitals for inpatient hospital services 
                             is calculated.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2001

   Mr. Kind introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the manner in which the wage index adjustment to payments 
under the Medicare Program to hospitals for inpatient hospital services 
                             is calculated.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Equitable Payment 
Enhancement Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CALCULATION OF MEDICARE INPATIENT HOSPITAL WAGE 
              INDEX.

    (a) In General.--Effective with respect to cost reporting periods 
beginning on or after October 1, 2002, in determining what proportion 
of operating costs of inpatient hospital services (as defined in 
section 1886(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(a)(4))) 
are attributable to wages and wage-related costs, the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services shall exclude the following cost categories:
            (1) ``Professional fees''.
            (2) ``Postal services''.
            (3) Under the cost category of ``All other labor 
        intensive'', the following:
                    (A) ``Business services''.
                    (B) ``Computer and data processing''.
                    (C) ``Other membership organizations''.
    (b) Use of More Recent Data in Updating the Wage Index.--The 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in updating the factor 
(established by the Secretary) reflecting the relative hospital wage 
level in the geographic area of a hospital compared to the national 
average hospital wage level under the second sentence of section 
1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)) 
for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall use data from the cost reports 
beginning during the third fiscal year that precedes the fiscal year 
involved.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                         211,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,560,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 74,315,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            77,788,219
<PP&E>                                      46,301,411
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,485,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             114,833,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,864,454
<BONDS>                                      3,033,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,355
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,489,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               114,833,197
<SALES>                                     95,617,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            95,617,667
<CGS>                                       60,637,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,004,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             973,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                       512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                762
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ PATRICIA A. GAVIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant , v. UNITED STATES , Defendant

- Appellee

.

__________________________ 2013

- 5095

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 11

- CV

- 0528, Senior Judge Eric G. Bru ggink

.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Patricia A. Gavin moves to reinstate her appeal that was dismissed on July 8, 2013 for failure to pay the required docketing fee and moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

. Accordingly , I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion to reinstate is denied. Case: 13-5095 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 10/09/2013GAVIN V
. US 2 (2) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is d enied

. F OR T HE C OURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
s26 Case: 13-5095 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 10/09/2013
#### Pierpont *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24934

— Decided September 26, 1934.)

*Miss Jessie Levy*and *Mr. Clarence C. Miller,*íot plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Ernest M. Botkin,,*prosecuting’ attorney, *Mr. Joseph H. Flick*and *Mr. Benjamin 8. Motter,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Matthias, Beyis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58291-58292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23468]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/79-0454]


Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption 
Under Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of 
Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 
160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee 
under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the 
Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought 
an exemption under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt 
security financing to Bill.com, Inc., 3520 Ash Street, Palo Alto, CA 
94306.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and 
Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., both Associates of Emergence 
Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of Bill.com, 
Inc., and therefore this transaction is considered a financing of an 
Associate requiring prior SBA approval.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction, within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20416.


[[Page 58292]]


    Dated: September 8, 2008.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
 [FR Doc. E8-23468 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Jacques Mot
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Jacques Mot
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       January 5, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01736-MSK-MJW

C. RANDEL LEWIS, solely in his capacity as Receiver,

Plaintiff,

v.

JULIE GIGLIO, IRA; and

JULIE GIGLIO, its beneficiary,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 8th day of July, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01736-MSK-MJW Document 6 Filed 07/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB

JEFFERY A. BOARDMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DYLAN HAUCK, and

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter arises on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to File Rebuttal Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(2) Disclosures to Defendant’s Rebuttal Disclosures [Doc. # 26, filed 1/13/2012] (the

“Motion”). The plaintiff claims the need to rebut the defendants’ neuroradiologist and physical

medicine experts because they “have challenged the diagnosis by Plaintiff’s treating physicians.” 

Motion [Doc. # 26] at ¶¶3, 5. The defendants do not oppose the Motion.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 26] is GRANTED; and

(2) The plaintiff shall designate experts in rebuttal to the opinions of defendants’

neuroradiologist and physical medicine experts and provide opposing counsel with all

information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 30, 2012.

Case 1:11-cv-01934-DME-BNB Document 28 Filed 01/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Dated January 17, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01934-DME-BNB Document 28 Filed 01/17/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Turhan Tate, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 476]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered October 18, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. o

*512Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Scherne, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Robert Scherne
                                             -------------------------
                                        Robert Scherne
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                        August 14, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 999 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 26, 2008.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Ms. Lee.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40152 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ALEXIS ACOSTA

- GUZMAN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1264

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alexis Acosta

Guzman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Acosta

- Guzman has filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Acosta

- Guzman ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 9, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40152 Document: 00513753587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2016No. 16

- 40152

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40152 Document: 00513753587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/09/2016
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

t1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145775

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145775

COA: 310730

Jackson CC: 10

- 006154

- FH

PATRICK ALAN GIDDIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 3, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.