alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques
Mot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Jacques Mot
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Jacques Mot
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       January _, 2007
Exhibit 32.1



              Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
              ------------------------------------------------
                     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                     ----------------------------------
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      ---------------------------------


      In connection with the Annual Report  of Carrington Laboratories, Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as
 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I Carlton
 E. Turner, President and  Chief Executive Officer of  the Company, certify,
 pursuant to  18  U.S. C.  S  1350, as  adopted  pursuant to  S  906 of  the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in  the Report fairly  presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 Date:     March 18, 2004



 /s/ Carlton E. Turner
 ---------------------
 President and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 10, 2023

No. 04-22-00729-CR

James Joshua GRIFFIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR11589

Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due November 7, 2022. On November 8, 2022, the 

court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension until March 8, 2023 to 

file the record. On November 10, 2022, we granted the court reporter’s request in part and 

ordered the reporter’s record due by January 6, 2023. On that day, the court reporter filed a 

second notification of late record requesting an extension until February 5, 2023. After 

consideration, we GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s record due by February 5, 

2023. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Robert L. Stanton, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 32930.)

Court of Claims,

February 8, 1957.

*R. Gordon Bradwick*for claimant.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Harold S. Coyne*of counsel), for defendant.

Richard S. Heller, J.

On June 20, 1954, the claimant with his wife went to Green Lake State Park located in Onondaga County near the city of Syracuse.

He paid admission to get into the park and after some hours there he decided that it was time to go home, it then being about 5:00 p.m.

In looking for friends he finally located them bathing' and decided to join them. He waded out until the water was up to his knees and then executed a surface dive. In so doing he either struck bottom or some submerged object and as a result he suffered injuries to his head.

The bathing area is confined to the western shore of the lake with north and south buoy lines extending out from the shore. Claimant contends that the accident happened near the middle of this beach and if his memory is correct he would have to pass by a sign sufficiently large to warn bathers against diving in that area. He did not see any sign.

The beach is a downward slope toward the east and the water depth increases gradually. Twelve feet from shore the depth is 2 feet and 30 feet from shore the depth is 6 feet.

The park has an attendence of 10,000 on week ends and some 5,000 to 6,000 people enjoy the bathing facilities during the day. At the time the accident happened it was estimated that 1,000 people were in the bathing area,

*288Every morning during the season the entire beach was searched for foreign bodies by employees of the State in an effort to avoid any possible injuries to bathers. The morning after the accident this procedure was followed and no object was found in the area. That some objects will be left on the beach by children and others should be as apparent to claimant as it would be to the State.

This search seems to the court to be sufficient by the State in its obligations to use reasonable care to prevent injury to the bathers. Had their experience been that other accidents of a similar nature had happened, then, they would necessarily be required to exercise a greater degree of care.

Claimant has a responsibility and a duty to exercise some degree of care in using this bathing area. In addition he must show negligence on the part of the State.

The proof here does not establish that the State was negligent.

The motion to dismiss made by the Attorney-General at the conclusion of the trial is granted and the claim is dismissed.

The foregoing constitutes the written and signed decision of this court upon which judgment may be entered. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 440.)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 937 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 9, 2008.
Whereas the emergency communications services provided by the American Red Cross 
        are free for military families experiencing a crisis;
Whereas the Red Cross can provide notification of emergencies and other 
        important events to over 1,400,000 active duty personnel, and 1,200,000 
        members of the National Guard and Reserves, on behalf of their family 
        members;
Whereas in an emergency, the Red Cross reaches out to verify the emergency and 
        provides third-party objective information to commanding officers;
Whereas the Red Cross provides timely and accurate information 7 days a week, 24 
        hours a day, 365 days a year, and such information can assist a 
        commander's decision whether to release a service member from duty in 
        order to join with his or her family in a time of hardship;
Whereas whether that service member is a reservist in 2 weeks of Arctic training 
        in Alaska, a sailor on a ship in the Indian Ocean, or a member of an 
        advanced team on patrol in Iraq, the Red Cross messaging system can 
        communicate messages between family members when and where other 
        civilian services cannot;
Whereas whether it is a birth or death notification, the Red Cross bears the 
        emotional mission to deliver accurate and timely messages between family 
        members;
Whereas the Red Cross ensures the delivery of the message and provides the 
        family with the needed support until the service member returns home; 
        and
Whereas the Red Cross provides services through 756 chapters in the United 
        States and on 58 military installations around the world to United 
        States Armed Forces personnel, including our troops in Kuwait, 
        Afghanistan, and Iraq: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives appreciates the vital emergency 
communications services provided by the American Red Cross between military 
service members and their families during emergencies or other important events.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Harry O. Carter, Appellant.

County Court, Wayne County,

November 30, 1956.

*Carl L. Katz*for appellant.

*Roger E. Davis, District Attorney (Maurice E. Strobriclge*of counsel), for respondent.

James D. Hurley, J.

This is an appeal from the conviction of the above-named defendant upon his plea of guilty before Carl H. Yotter, Justice of the Peace of the Town of Huron, to a charge of driving while intoxicated.

*215It is the contention of the defendant that the information upon which he was arraigned was insufficient in law to give the court jurisdiction to arraign the defendant and that the plea of guilty could not give the court such jurisdiction and was in effect a nullity.

The information, after formally reciting the charge of driving while intoxicated in violation of subdivision 5 of section 70 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York continues as follows: “ by wrongfully, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly did drive *&*operate a 1947 Ford bearing N. Y. Beg. WA 5723 in a northerly direction along the Lummisville Bd, a public highway, while in an intoxicated condition. To wit defendant operated said vehicle in such a manner as to go the east shoulder & into a ditch, he then staggered from his vehicle on to the lawn of a local resident *&*became sick, defendant then fell asleep on the lawn. ’ ’

Except for the statement that the defendant staggered from his vehicle, became sick and fell asleep on the lawn, there are no facts whatever showing that the defendant, at the time he drove the automobile, was in an intoxicated condition. While those facts might indicate that the defendant was intoxicated, they could be equally consistent with an assumption that he might have been injured when driving the car into the ditch.

In the return of the Justice, it appears that the defendant was arraigned on August 12, 1956 at 10:35 p.m., although the information charges the commission of the offense at 3 o ’clock in the afternoon, some seven and one-half hours earlier. Such a long delay between the time of the apparent arrest and the arraignment definitely constitutes a violation of the rights of a person arrested and should not be countenanced by the courts. It is interesting to note that in the return, the Justice states that at the arraignment that the defendant asked permission to leave the room as he was going to he sick. It would be as logical to presume that his sickness before the Justice some seven and one-half hours after the alleged crime was the result of an intoxicated condition as it would be to presume that his sickness at the time of the alleged crime was due to intoxication.

While the information advised the defendant of the charge against him, and the time and place of the alleged crime, it failed to state facts indicating that at the time and place set forth in the information the defendant was intoxicated while driving Ms automobile. *(People*v. *Grogan,*260 N. Y. 138.)

The conviction should be reversed and the fine remitted.

Submit order accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,028,797
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,165,378
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (67,731)
<INVENTORY>                                    78,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,401,516
<PP&E>                                         5,768,606
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,157,608)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,513,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,571,374
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       25,750
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,624,648
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,513,692
<SALES>                                        19,745,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,745,950
<CGS>                                          18,286,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,286,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,738,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             190,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (469,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   158,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (311,015)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (311,015)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1099 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1099


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2007

      Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
  employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE.

    Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by inserting before the matter following subparagraph 
        (I) the following:
                    ``(J) an individual who is employed by the 
                Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission and 
                is a citizen of the United States,''.

            Passed the Senate June 22, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Lubrano, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 329]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered March 25, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, 5 to 10 years and 3 to 6 years, respectively, and appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 4, 1998, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate judgment made on the ground of newly discovered evidence, held in abeyance pending determination by Supreme Court, New York County of defendant’s further motion to vacate judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g).

The parties have called to this Court’s attention the fact that there have been significant new developments concerning defendant’s claim of newly discovered evidence. Accordingly, the interests of justice and judicial economy would be served by holding this appeal in abeyance, as indicated. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending January 19, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITIGROUP INC.                                                                                                          InvestmentPrior notice by Citigroup, acting through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Citicorp LLC,  New York, New York to make an additional investment in Banco Nacional De Mexico, S.A., Mexico City, Mexico, ("Banamex"), pursuant to Section 211.10(a)(1) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableJPMORGAN CHASE & CO.                                                                                                    InvestmentJPMorgan Chase & Co., New York, New York, provides prior notice for J.P Morgan International Finance Limited, Newark, Delaware, to make an investment in a foreign subsidiary, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                                                               Other ForeignJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Columbus, Ohio, to amend its Articles of Association to change the location of its home office from 270 Park Avenue to 383 Madison Avenue, both of New York, New York.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1078
In Re: JACQUELINE W. GRANATI, Debtor.
JACQUELINE W. GRANATI, Appellant, versus STONE STREET CAPITAL, INCORPORATED; STONE STREET SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellees.
No. 03-1079
In Re: JACQUELINE W. GRANATI, Debtor.
JACQUELINE W. GRANATI, Appellant, versus2 STONE STREET CAPITAL, INCORPORATED; STONE STREET SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1515-A, BK-00-14419, CA-01-1061-SSM, CA-02- 1516-A, CA-01-1025-SSM) Submitted: April 30, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003 Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacqueline W. Granati, Appellant Pro Se. Carlton Tufts Obecny, Bethesda, Maryland; Elyse L. Strickland, SELZER, GURVITCH, RABIN & OBENCY, CHTD., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Jacqueline W. Granati appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determinations that Appellees were the equitable owners of the payments due under an annuity contract, that this interest was not a dischargeable claim in Granati’s bankruptcy action, and that Granati’s liability for conversion of pre-petition payments was nondischargeable in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the records in these appeals and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Granati’s motion for a contract quantum meruit and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Granati v. Stone Street , Nos. CA-02-1515-A, CA-01-1061-SSM, CA-02-1516-A, CA-01-1025-SSM, BK-00- 14419 (E.D. Va. Dec. 24, 2002). We also deny Granati’s motion to appear by telephone for oral argument and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.2



AWARENESS LETTER



May 26, 2004



Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp.

2727 Diehl Road

Naperville, Illinois 60563



We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary for the three-month periods ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003, as indicated in our report dated May 26, 2004;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.



We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-92248, 333-98549, and 333-108222 on
Form S-8.



We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|Chicago, Illinois
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Healthcare Technology,  Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the period from January 27, 2005  (Inception)  through  March
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the  best of his
knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.



                                            /s/ Linda Contreras
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:  Linda Contreras
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer/
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                            Dated: August 17, 2007