alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

                                [To be completed]


</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001024605
<NAME>                        New Generation Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         6,651
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               69,376
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 504,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,522,339
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,838
<OTHER-SE>                                     804,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (3,017,197)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             44,117
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (286,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (286,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (286,871)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02



</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00775

- CR

ANTONIO DELEON

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On a ppeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12

- 2

- 26381

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 19, 2014.
#### In the Matter of Desiree Rosa Gonzalez, Respondent, v New York City Clerk, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 868]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), entered January 6, 2005, which, to the extent appealable, denied the respondent City Clerk’s motion to renew, inter alia, his cross motion to dismiss the petition, previously denied in an order of the same court and Justice, entered August 16, 2004, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Renewal was properly denied since the purported new matter offered by respondent could have been submitted on the original motion *(see Herrera v Matlin,*4 AD3d 139 [2004]). Inasmuch as the denial of renewal was proper, and the denial of that branch of respondent’s motion seeking reargument is nonappealable *(see Williams v City of New York,*19 AD3d 251 [2005]), and no appeal has been taken from the original August 16, 2004 determination, respondent’s arguments addressed to that determination are not properly before us. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

927 COLE STREET, GOLDEN, COLORADO, and

2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER, VIN #JTEES42A182076495,

Defendants.

JUDGMENT AS TO FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), and the orders entered in this case, is hereby

entered.

In accordance with the ORDER AS TO 2008 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER [ECF NO.

63] entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on February 5, 2013, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Request for Final

Order of Forfeiture as to Defendant No. 2 [Docket No. 56] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that default judgment and forfeiture of the 2008 Toyota Highlander,

VIN #JTEES42A182076495, including all right, title, and interest, is entered in favor of

plaintiff United States of America.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 7h

 day of February, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02106-PAB-CBS Document 64 Filed 02/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00361-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. THOMAS DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon a review of the file. To ensure that all

pre-trial phases of the case are complete before the commencement of the jury trial, it is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by Monday, December 19,

2011, and responses to these motions shall be filed by Friday, December 30, 2011. It

is

FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on all pending motions, if any, and final trial

preparation conference will not be set at this time. The parties shall contact Chambers

should a hearing become necessary. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that a 3-day jury trial is set for Monday, January 9, 2012,

at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom A-1002.
-2-

Dated: November 1, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL

CHIEF U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02325-CBS

JEFFREY B. SAFFER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CLUB HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company,

Defendant. 

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

_____________________________________________________________________

This civil action comes before the court on the parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal with

Prejudice” (filed June 22, 2012) (Doc. # 35). On December 13, 2011, this case was

referred to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer to handle all dispositive matters including trial

and entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and

D.C. COLO. LCivR 72.2. (See Doc. # 15). The court now being sufficiently advised in the

premises, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. The parties' Stipulation is approved and this civil action is dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear his or its own

attorney fees and costs. 

2. All deadlines and settings in this case are hereby vacated. 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of June, 2012. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Craig B. Shaffer 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02325-CBS Document 36 Filed 06/22/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 25 2- CV Natalia A
. F ALDT , Appellant
v . Chad F ALDT , Appellee Fr om the 45th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI -08569 Honora ble David A. B erc helmann, Jr., J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Deliver ed and F iled: May 12, 2010 DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTI ON The c lerk’s rec ord, which was due on Marc h 15, 2010, has not bee n filed. On Apr il 1, 2010, this court order ed appe llant to provide written proof by April 12, 2010 that either: (1) the cler k’s fe e ha s b e e n p a id o r a

rr a ng e me nts have be e n ma de to pa y the c le rk ’s fe e , o r ( 2) a

pp e lla nt i s e nti tle d to
a pp e a l w ith ou t pa

y ingthe c le rk ’s fee. Th e orde r f ur the r w a rn e d a

pp e lla nt t ha t f a ilure to t ime ly respond would r esult in dismi ssal of the appea l. Appellant did not respond. The appea l is dism issed04
- 10
- 00 25 2- CV

- 2- for wa nt of prosec ution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .3 (b ), 42 .3 (b ). Cos ts o f t he a pp e a l are ta xed

a g a ins t
a pp e lla nt. PER C URI AM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K/A of First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") for theyear ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

                                           /s/ Laura Beth Butler                                           Chief Financial Officer                                            Date: July 27, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDERSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthis periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc.

 
| Date:  August 16, 2004 |                                                 |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                 |
|                        | /s/  W. Bradley Blair, II                       |   |
|                        | W. Bradley  Blair, II                                |
|                        | *President and Chief Executive Officer*              |
|                        |                                                 |
|                        |                                                 |
| Date:  August 16, 2004 |                                                 |
|                        |                                                 |
|                        | /s/  Scott D. Peters                            |   |
|                        | Scott D.  Peters                                     |
|                        | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT NO. 21

                            SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                       for the
                                  Fiscal Year Ended
                                  DECEMBER 31, 1996


                                       Page 64


<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              SUBSIDIARIES                         STATE                OPERATING NAME
                                                    OF
                                              INCORPORATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>              <C>
Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Paducah, Inc.   Kentucky       Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Fidelity Credit Corporation                      Kentucky       Fidelity Credit Corporation
Pennyrile Citizens Bank and Trust Company        Kentucky       Pennyrile Citizens Bank and Trust Company
Bank of Marshall County                          Kentucky       Bank of Marshall County
Graves County Bank, Inc.                         Kentucky       Graves County Bank
United Commonwealth, FSB                         Kentucky       United Commonwealth Bank, FSB
United Commonwealth Service Corporation          Kentucky       United Commonwealth Service Corporation
</TABLE>


                                       Page 65
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP08-475-000]


Pecan Pipeline (North Dakota), Inc.; Notice of Petition for 
Declaratory Order

October 1, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 18, 2008, Pecan Pipeline (North 
Dakota), Inc., filed a petition for a declaratory order under Rule 
207(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 
385.207(a)(2) (2008), requesting that the Commission disclaim 
jurisdiction over proposed construction and operation of certain 
natural gas facilities because such facilities perform a gathering 
function exempt from the Commission's jurisdiction under section 1(b) 
of the Natural Gas Act.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbfdfee9f8f4d5d7d2d5dee8cecbcbd4c9cffbdddec9d895dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c6a697e6f6342404542497f595c5c435e586c4a495e4f024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time October 30, 2008.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-23620 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Pence, Jr., Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Paul W. Pence, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Paul W. Pence, Jr.
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
May 14, 2003




                                       17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02370-CMA-KMT

K-BEECH, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without

Prejudice of Defendant John Doe (Doc. # 27), filed March 6, 2012. The Court, having

reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises, hereby 

ORDERS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATED: March 9, 2012 

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02370-CMA-MJW Document 28 Filed 03/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Mildred R. Tripp, Plaintiff, *v.*Edgar Knox et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

March 18, 1957.

*Donohue & Bohl*for Edgar Knox, defendant.

*E. Stewart Jones*for plaintiff.

Donald S. Taylor, J.

The defendant Knox moves for an order pursuant to section 324 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 140 and 141 of the Rules of Civil Practice to require the plaintiff to produce for discovery and inspection the records of a Canadian hospital pertaining to her care and treatment for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, to recover damages for which she has instituted this action. The plaintiff resists the application principally on the ground that such records are privileged.

*772It would hardly be consonant with our present judicial concepts to contemplate that the remedy of discovery and inspection should be construed so limitedly as to render it impotent, under proper safeguards, to cope with an unusual problem such as this. *(Del Ra*v. *Vaughan,*2 A D 2d 156; *Wilhelm*v. *Abel,*1 A D 2d 55.) To prove her case at the trial the plaintiff almost inevitably will waive her personal privilege. These records which are under her control should be accessible to eliminate delay, or even mistrial, when her waiver becomes operative. *(Rubin*v. *Equitable Life Assur. Soc.,*269 App. Div. 677; *Cardot*v. *Ball,*263 App. Div. 788.)

The motion is granted as follows: the plaintiff is directed to procure such hospital records and to deposit them in a sealed envelope bearing the name of the patient, the title of the case and the names of the attorneys representing the parties with the clerk of this court in the County of Albany who shall give a receipt therefor and be responsible for their safekeeping, which envelope shall not be opened for inspection or its contents exhibited except on order of the trial court. Such clerk will be served with a copy of the order to be entered hereon at the time the records are deposited with him as herein provided, and he shall return such records to plaintiff or her attorney when they are no longer needed. Until compliance by the plaintiff, the trial of her cause will be stayed.

Settle order on notice.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                 TBC CORPORATION

                            LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

            WHEREAS, TBC Corporation (the "Company") intends to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004;

            NOW, THEREFORE, each of the undersigned, in his capacity as a
director of the Company, hereby appoints Lawrence C. Day and/or Thomas W.
Garvey, or either of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, to execute in his name, place and
stead, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004 (including any amendment to such report), and any and all other instruments
necessary or incidental in connection therewith, and to file the same with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Either of said attorneys shall have full
power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of each of the
undersigned, in the aforesaid capacity, every act whatsoever necessary or
desirable to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as each of the
undersigned might or could do in person. Each of the undersigned hereby ratifies
and approves the acts of either of said attorneys.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
instrument as of the date set forth adjacent to his respective signature.

Date:  March ___, 2005
                                              --------------------------------
                                              MARVIN E. BRUCE

Date:  March ___, 2005
                                              --------------------------------
                                              MICHAEL E. DUNLAP

Date:  March ___, 2005
                                              --------------------------------
                                              CHARLES A. LEDSINGER, JR.

Date:  March 30, 2005                         /s/ William J. McCarthy
                                              --------------------------------
                                              WILLIAM J. McCARTHY

Date:  March 30, 2005                         /s/ Richard A. McStay
                                              --------------------------------
                                              RICHARD A. McSTAY

Date:  March 30, 2005                         /s/ Donald Ratajczak
                                              --------------------------------
                                              DONALD RATAJCZAK

Date:  March 31, 2005                         /s/ Robert R. Schoeberl
                                              --------------------------------
                                              ROBERT R. SCHOEBERL

Date:  March ___, 2005
                                              --------------------------------
                                              RAYMOND E. SCHULTZ

                                    75 of 79
#### Carl R. Meisel, Respondent, v Christine F. Meisel, Appellant.

[812 NYS2d 39]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2004, which, in an action for divorce, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly found that the “Postnuptial Agreement,” which provided for the division of the parties’ assets in the event of separation and was negotiated with the assistance of separate and independent counsel, qualifies as a separation *519agreement for purposes of a conversion divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170 (6). No issues of fact in that regard are raised by the circumstance that the parties did not separate until some seven months after the agreement was signed. Nor are any issues of fact raised as to the fairness of the agreement. We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.