alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                     SCHEDULE TO FORM OF HCRI LOAN AGREEMENT
           PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          LENDER                TENANT                LOAN AMOUNT        MANAGER             STATE DEFINITION
                                                                                                             REFERS TO STATE
                                                                                                             OF
<S>                       <C>                   <C>                   <C>                <C>                 <C>
LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA     Pennsylvania BCC      Financial Care        $686,800           Balanced Care at    Pennsylvania
                          Properties, Inc.      Investors of                             Lebanon, Inc.
                                                Lebanon, LLC

LOYALSOCK, PENNSYLVANIA   Pennsylvania BCC      Financial Care        $674,050           Balanced Care at    Pennsylvania
                          Properties, Inc.      Investors of                             Loyalsock, Inc.
                                                Loyalsock, LLC

WESTERVILLE, OHIO         HCN BCC Holdings,     Financial Care        $1,313,675         Balanced Care at    Ohio
                          Inc.                  Investors of                             Westerville, Inc.
                                                Westerville, LLC

MORRISTOWN, TENNESSEE     HCN BCC Holdings,     Financial Care        $692,000           Balanced Care at    Tennessee
                          Inc.                  Investors of                             Morristown, Inc.
                                                Morristown, LLC

OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE      HCN BCC Holdings,     Financial Care        $697,948           Balanced Care at    Tennessee
                          Inc.                  Investors of Oak                         Oak Ridge, Inc.
                                                Ridge, LLC

SAGAMORE HILLS, OHIO      HCN BCC Holdings,     Financial Care        $1,243,550         Balanced Care at    Ohio
                          Inc.                  Investors of                             Sagamore Hills,
                                                Sagamore Hills, LLC                      Inc.
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Tracy S.Clifford, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Golf Trust of America, Inc;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 
| August 16, 2007 |     | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                        |   |
|-----------------|----------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |     | Tracy S. Clifford                            |
|            | * * | *Principal Accounting Officer and Secretary* |

 

----
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January      14, 2009                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                         |
| /s/ COREEN SAWDON                                                                            |
| Coreen      Sawdon                                                                           |
| Senior      Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Acting Chief Financial      Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert H. Daskal, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Robert H. Daskal
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert H. Daskal
                                        Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 17, 2004


                                       27
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10105

Conference Calendar

__________________

RONNIE TIMMONS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

COUNTY OF DALLAS, AND

JIM BOWLES,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-1822-H

- - - - - - - - - -

(March 23, 1995)

Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint

if it is frivolous, that is, if it lacks an arguable basis either

in law or in fact. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1733-34

(1992). A 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) dismissal is reviewed for abuse of

discretion. Id. at 1734.

Although this court liberally construes the writings of pro

se appellants, arguments must be briefed to be preserved.

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (citations
No. 95-10105

-2-

omitted). Timmons does not in any way brief any issue on this

appeal. Timmons' appeal does not demonstrate that the district

court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as

frivolous. The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Fifth Cir.

R. 42.2.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 28, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22

- 1295

Lower Tribunal No s

. F93

- 18139C & F93

- 18141C

________________



### Tramain Smith

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from

the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Joseph Perkins , Judge.

Tramain Smith

, in proper person.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab , Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., a nd EMAS and BOKOR , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                                       September 27, 1996

Craig Teuscher

RE:      EMPLOYMENT TERMS

Dear Mr. Teuscher:

Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. is pleased to offer you the position of
Systems Engineer, on the following terms.

You will be responsible for systems integration and technical marketing. You
will work at our facility located at 2201 Broadway, Oakland, CA. Of course,
Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. may change your position, duties, and
work location from time to time as it deems necessary.

Your compensation will be $3,000 per month, less payroll deductions and all
required withholdings. $1,800 per month of your compensation will be deferred
until September 27, 1997. You will be paid monthly and you will be eligible for
the following standard Company benefits as plans are established by the company:
medical insurance, vacation, sick leave, holidays. Details about these benefit
plans are available for your review. Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. may
modify compensation and benefits from time to time as it deems necessary.

As a Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. employee, you will be expected to
abide by Company rules and regulations, and sign and comply with a Proprietary
Information and Inventions Agreement which prohibits unauthorized use or
disclosure of Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. proprietary information.

Normal working hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. You
will be scheduled to work two-and-a-half days per week. However, as an exempt
salaried employee, you will be expected to work additional hours as required by
the nature of your work assignments.

You may terminate your employment with Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. at
any time and for any reason whatsoever simply by notifying Berkeley Integrated
Technologies, Inc. Likewise, Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. may
terminate your employment at any time and for any reason whatsoever, with or
without cause or advance notice. This at-will employment relationship cannot be
changed except in a writing signed by a Company officer.

The employment terms in this letter supersede any other agreements or promises
made to you by anyone, whether oral or written. As required by law, this offer
is subject to satisfactory proof of your right to work in the United States.

Please sign and date this letter, and return it to me if you wish to accept
employment at Berkeley Integrated Technologies, Inc. under the terms described
above.

<PAGE>

We look forward to your favorable reply and to a productive and enjoyable work
relationship.

Sincerely,

/s/ Greg Hildebrand

--------------------------
Greg Hildebrand

ACCEPTED:

/s/ Craig Teuscher

--------------------------
Craig Teuscher

September 27, 1996

--------------------------
Date

                                       2
#### DUFRENE v. DUFRENE.

No. 1201.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 5, 1933.

J. A. O. Coignet, of Thibodaux, for appellant.

Harvey Peltier, of Thibodaux, for appellee.

ELLIOTT, Judge.

In this case the record contains no brief filed by the defendant-appellant. There is an appeal bond, but no order granting an appeal, no copy of the minutes, no certificate that the record is complete.

There is no motion to dismiss, but an order of appeal is jurisdictional, and when there is none we can but act ex officio and dismiss the appeal. Gagneaux v. Desonier, 104 La. 648, 29 So. 282; Walker v. Parish of Tangipahoa, 111 La. 321, 35 So. 585; Sammons v. N. O. Ry. & Light Co., 143 La. 734, 79 So. 320; Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co., 165 La. 563, 115 So. 752; Wiley v. Ballio & Perry, 171 La. 411, 131 So. 192.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Lyle Graham, Respondent, v Joan Graham, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 715]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 18, 1989, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated September 28, 2001, which, inter alia, denied that branch of her motion which was to reinstate the child support provisions of the judgment of divorce, nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the mother’s claim that the Supreme Court improperly denied her motion to reinstate the support provisions contained in the parties’ 1989 judgment of divorce, nunc pro tunc. The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in directing the mother to file a petition for current support and college expenses in the Family Court *(see Kagen v Kagen,*21 NY2d 532).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
. . 

. . 

. .
Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 80 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 80 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 80 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 80 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-02306-RM-KLM Document 80 Filed 12/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
#### Lilyan DIAMOND, Appellant, v. MT. SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER MIAMI, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Nov. 12, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1099 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1099

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
   employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE.
    Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ``and'' after the 
    semicolon; and
        (3) by inserting before the matter following subparagraph (I) 
    the following:
            ``(J) an individual who is employed by the Roosevelt 
        Campobello International Park Commission and is a citizen of 
        the United States,''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
12-31-98  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              254,956
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9,168,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (632,815) 
<INVENTORY>                                       9,380,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18,761,327
<PP&E>                                            6,572,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,038,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29,190,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27,565,297
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             11,862
<OTHER-SE>                                        5,694,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29,190,714
<SALES>                                          21,111,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 21,111,704
<CGS>                                            15,808,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    15,808,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18,254,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,198,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,126,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,126,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,126,945)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.380)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.380)
                                               


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 3.4**

 

Amendment to Shuffle Master’s Corporate Bylaws 

 

Adopted by Board of Directors on January 11, 2005 

 

7.01    Certificates of Stock and Uncertificated Shares of Stock.  Shares of stock of the corporation may be certified or uncertified asprovided under Minnesota law. Every owner of stock of the corporation shall, at his election, be entitled to a certificate, to be in such form as the Board prescribes, certifying the number of shares of stock of the corporation owned by him. Thecertificates for such shares shall be numbered in the order in which they shall be issued and shall be signed in the name of the corporation by the Chief Executive Officer and by the Secretary, or by any other proper officer of the corporationauthorized by the Board. A record shall be kept of the name of the person, firm or corporation owning the stock of the corporation whether or not represented by a certificate, and the respective issue dates thereof, and in the case of cancellation,the respective dates of cancellation. Every certificate surrendered to the corporation for exchange or transfer shall be cancelled and no other certificate or certificates shall be issued in exchange for any existing certificates until such existingcertificates shall have been so cancelled except in cases provided for in Section 7.05 of this Article VII. 

 

7.04    Transfer of Shares.  Transfer of shares on the books of the corporation may be authorized only by the shareholder named in the certificate, or, as to uncertificated shares of stock,by the shareholder as shown on the ownership records as kept by the corporation, or the shareholder’s legal representative, or duly authorized attorney-in-fact, and, in the case of shares represented by a certificate, upon surrender forcancellation of the certificate or certificates for such shares. The shareholder in whose name shares of stock stand on the books of the corporation shall be deemed the owner thereof for all purposes as regards the corporation; provided, that whenany transfer of shares shall be made as collateral security, and not absolutely, such facts, if known to the Secretary of the corporation, or to the transfer agent, shall be so expressed in the entry of transfer. 

 

7.06    [Not Used]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01947-MSK-BNB

JOHN D. FERWEDA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WSE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation d/b/a Willis Shaw

Express,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 29th day of August, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01947-MSK-BNB Document 3 Filed 08/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1