alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ZAPWORLD.COM FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          2,660
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     514
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (53)
<INVENTORY>                                     1,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,866
<PP&E>                                            795
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             654
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       12,257
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,601)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,980
<SALES>                                         1,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,934
<CGS>                                           1,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (53)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (8)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Shuffle Master, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Yoseloff,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: January 16, 2007                        |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ MARK L.  YOSELOFF                              |   |
| Mark L. Yoseloff                                   |
| Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 21

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent corporation of 357 subsidiaries which operate "off-price" retail stores in the United States.

Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation, which buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in connection with the Company's business.

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, which leases the Company's store in Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania to one of the Company's operating subsidiaries.

Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates a wholesale apparel business.

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an interest in a manufacturer of coats.

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade names.

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is an investment holding company.

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 216

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the exemption from 
     income tax for social clubs found to be practicing prohibited 
                            discrimination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the exemption from 
     income tax for social clubs found to be practicing prohibited 
                            discrimination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR SOCIAL CLUBS PRACTICING 
              PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 501 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to prohibition of discrimination by 
certain social clubs) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
        sentence ``, or if, at any time during the taxable year or a 
        prior taxable year, a determination by an appropriate 
        government agency or court that such organization has a pattern 
        or practice of so discriminating against any person became 
        final'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence:
``A final determination shall cease to be taken into account under the 
first sentence after the date it is established to the satisfaction of 
the Secretary that the organization no longer engages in discrimination 
of the type involved in such determination.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1099 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2007 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to 

make individuals employed by the Roosevelt Campobello 

International Park Commission eligible to obtain Federal 

health insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

S 1099 RFH

1 SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE. 

2 Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

7 after the semicolon; and 

8 (3) by inserting before the matter following 

9 subparagraph (I) the following: 

10 ‘‘(J) an individual who is employed by the 

11 Roosevelt Campobello International Park Com12 mission and is a citizen of the United States,’’. 

Passed the Senate June 22, 2007. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2018

No. 04-18-00944-CR

Rickie RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR4578

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Rickie Rodriguez pled nolo contendere to 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to five years of imprisonment and a 

fine of $1500.00 in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On November 5, 

2018, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a 

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

After Rodriguez filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and 

notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s 

Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission 

to appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes 

the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written 

motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its 

permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately 

reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Rodriguez does not have a right to appeal. We 

must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not 

been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), 

unless an amended trial court certification showing that Rodriguez has the right to appeal is 
made part of the appellate record by January 16, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).

We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jarett A. Misch, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended July 29, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 12, 2006



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jarett A. Misch                                    
|Jarett A. Misch                                        
|Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Streicher Mobile
Fueling, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/S/ RICHARD E. GATHRIGHT
-------------------------------------
Richard E. Gathright
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002


/S/ MICHAEL S. SHORE
-------------------------------------
Michael S. Shore
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT AUGUST 31, 1997 AND
THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         160,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,220,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,078,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,407,506
<PP&E>                                       1,365,996
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,008,707)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,026,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,606,853
<BONDS>                                         68,369
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,335,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,026,173
<SALES>                                      9,173,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,194,990
<CGS>                                        5,439,461
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,439,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               520,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,698
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,446
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### Saman F. Khoury, Appellant, v Daoud Khoury, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 714]

In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), dated March 22, 2001, as, after a nonjury trial and upon a decision of the same court, dated February 16, 2000, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing his cause of action.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The Supreme Court correctly dismissed the plaintiff’s cause of action. The court properly found that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was insufficient to meet his burden of proof *(cf. McCann v Cronin,*276 AD2d 472; *Silber v Muschel,*190 AD2d 727; *see generally, People v McCovey,*281 AD2d 644; *Matter of Castellano v England,*275 AD2d 412; *Norwest Mtge. v Diaz,*273 AD2d 211). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Amscan Holdings, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e)
and 15d15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Omitted as permitted;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over
financial reporting.
 August 14, 2007
 /s/ Gerald C. RittenbergGerald C. RittenbergChief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer) 41
----

**Exhibit      23.01**

**LAROCHE      PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD.**

**CONSENT      OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM**

**ENGINEERS      AND GEOLOGISTS**

|                             | LaRoche                Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                               |
|                             |                                               |
|                             |                                               |
|                             | By:                /s/ William M. Kazmann          |
|                             |                                               |
|                             | Name:                William M. Kazmann            |
|                             |                                               |
|                             | Title:                Senior Partner               |
|                             |                                               |
|                             |                                               |
| Dallas,                Texas     |                                               |
| November                13, 2007 |                                               |

----
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

 

I, Katrin Watkins, Assistant Secretary of John Deere Capital Corporation, state:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from March 13, 2019 (the date of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2019 transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through November 3, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 13, 2019 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2019 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 
| Date: January 10,   2020 | * * | John Deere Capital   Corporation |
|-------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------|
|                          |     |                             |
| * *                      | * * | * *                         |
|                          | By:      | */s/ Katrin Watkins*             |
|                          |     | Katrin Watkins                   |
|                          |     | Assistant Secretary              |

 

----