alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CertificatePursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAccess Anytime Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the periodended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof  (the“Report”), I, Norman R. Corzine, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theBoard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2004 |     | /s/ Norman R. Corzine                     |   |
|-----------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |     | Norman R. Corzine, Chairman of the Board, |
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer                   |
| * *                    | * * | *(Principal Executive Officer)*           |

 

----
[Letterhead of Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc.]

                                                     January 15, 1998


Mr. Thomas Cohen
1290 Avenue of the Americas
2nd Floor
New York, N.Y. 10104

            Re:   Compensation as an Outside Director

Dear Tom:

            The purpose of this letter is to confirm the arrangements that have
been in effect since July 1, 1997 with respect to fees payable to you as an
outside Director. The arrangements that we have been operating under since July
1, 1997 are that you will be paid an annual directors fee of $18,000 for each
fiscal year. One half of the compensation is payable in cash on a quarterly
basis and one half is payable in shares of common stock on a quarterly basis
valued at the closing price of the last trading day of each quarter. As we
agreed, there will be no other compensation payable to you as an outside
director, other than reimbursement of out of pocket expenses. This will also
acknowledge that you are automatically entitled to receive options covering
5,000 shares under the outside Directors Stock Option Program on each July 1, so
long as you remain an outside director.

            A consulting agreement is to be entered into as of January 1, 1998
covering consulting services to be performed by you beyond your duties as an
outside director.

            I tremendously appreciate and value your help. Will you please
confirm our arrangement by signing a copy of this letter in the space indicated
below and returning it to me.

                                           Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ John Loeffler, President
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       By: John Loeffler, President

Accepted and Agreed


/s/ Thomas Cohen
---------------------------------
      Thomas Cohen
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD08-13-000]


Transmission Barriers to Entry; Notice of Technical Conference

September 24, 2008.
    Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will hold 
a technical conference on October 14, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
(Eastern Time) in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The 
conference will be open for the public to attend and advance 
registration is not required. Members of the Commission may attend the 
conference.
    The purpose of this conference is to explore barriers to 
transmission development. The agenda for this conference will be 
published at a later time.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e6e4e4e2f4f4eee5eeebeef3fec7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9d9f9f998f8f959e9590958885bc9a998e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact: Katie 
Detweiler, 202-502-6424, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f59e94819c90db91908182909c999087b593908796db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="caa1abbea3afe4aeafbebdafa3a6afb88aacafb8a9e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a> or Sarah McKinley, 
202-502-8368, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c4f5d4e5d5412515f5755525059457c5a594e5f125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e7d6f7c6f6620636d656760626b774e686b7c6d20696178">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23064 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending August 11, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCFG COMMUNITY BANK                                                                                                      * BranchCFG Community Bank, Lutherville, Maryland, to establish a branch at 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MarylandNewspaper: 08/18/2012Federal Register: Not applicableCITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY                                                                                         * BranchCitizens Bank and Trust Company, Blackstone, Virginia, to establish a branch at the corner of Iron Bridge Road and Oliver's Way, Chesterfield, VirginiaNewspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicablePIONEER BANK                                                                                                            * BranchPioneer Bank, Stanley, Virginia, to establish a branch location at Stoneridge Drive, North, Gateway Center, Lot 1A, Ruckersville, VirginiaNewspaper: 08/20/2012Federal Register: Not applicable
Case No. 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 42 filed 02/22/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 42 filed 02/22/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 42 filed 02/22/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,180
<INVENTORY>                                     93,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,206
<PP&E>                                          55,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          135,178
<BONDS>                                        178,116
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,055)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,222
<SALES>                                      1,790,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,790,006
<CGS>                                        1,656,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,635
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,627
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin P. Feeley

v. Civil No. 07-cv-402-PB

US Attorney’s Office

 - District of New Hampshire

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $4.70 is due no later than January

20, 2008. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the Northern NH

Correctional Facility when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 18, 2007

cc: Kevin P. Feeley, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Northern NH Correctional Facility, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00402-PB Document 7 Filed 12/18/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Douglas C. McDermott, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant. Iris McDermott, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 33548.)

(Claim No. 33549.)

Court of Claims,

February 15, 1957.

*295
      *George W. Pratt*for claimants.

*Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General (Timothy F. O’Brien*of counsel), for defendant.

Richard S. Heller, J.

On September 15, 1955, claimant Iris McDermott was driving the car of her husband, claimant Douglas 0. McDermott, southerly on State Highway Route 15. At the intersection of Route 15 with a Steuben County road known as County Road No. 17 her car collided with a truck owned and operated by one Lee Horton.

Horton was proceeding easterly on County Road No. 17 and intended to cross Route 15 and to continue easterly on Road No. 17. He testified he stopped 15 feet westerly of the intersection before entering Route 15 and saw no one coming in either direction. He then “ took off ” and was struck by the car driven by Iris McDermott. The collision happened east of the center of the intersection and Horton’s truck ended up 20 feet south, on the east shoulder of Route 15 heading north. It was established that the front of the McDermott car struck the center of the stake body of Horton’s truck.

Claimant Iris McDermott testified she was driving southerly on the day in question about 3:30 p.m. at a rate of speed of approximately 45 to 50 miles per hour. As she neared the intersection where the accident happened she saw a 35 MPH sign and an intersection sign, both of which are 2 by 2 feet standard signs in good condition. She also saw the truck of Horton approaching on the side road. At the time she observed the signs and the truck her car was approximately 400 feet north of the intersection. As she approached the intersection she let up on the gas, saw Horton’s truck coming on to Route 15, swerved to the left, applied her brakes, pulled back to the right and the collision occurred.

Claimants ’ contention is that the State was negligent because no “ Stop ” sign had been erected on County Road No. 17 and upon the further ground that the State failed to place and locate the “ intersection” sign and the “ speed control” sign in a *296proper place so they could be easily discernible to users of the highway.

The proof in this case indicates (1) that Horton did stop before coming into Route 15 and (2) the claimant, Iris McDermott, did see both the “ speed control ” sign and the *“*intersection ” sign.

Sight distance is good at this intersection and the placing of a *“*Stop ” sign here would not have prevented this accident.

The claimants have failed to establish that the State was negligent and their claims must be dismissed.

The findings and conclusions of both parties have been marked and signed and are submitted with this decision.

The foregoing constitutes the written and signed decision of this court upon which judgment may be entered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                         201,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,184,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 70,368,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            75,189,795
<PP&E>                                      40,988,027
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,094,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,432,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,059,475
<BONDS>                                      3,771,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,392
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,116,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,432,511
<SALES>                                     35,315,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,315,504
<CGS>                                       23,573,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,946,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             380,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,586,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,433,880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,152,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,152,365)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted), the undersigned, Mark R. Doede, President, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Periodic
Report”), to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Periodic Report.




DATED: March 31,
2009




/S/ Mark R. DoedeMark
      R. DoedePresident,
      Chief Operating Officer,and
      Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

355South Grand Avenue 

Suite2000 

LosAngeles, CA 90071-1568

 

**Independent Auditors’Consent**

 

The Board of Directors 

PerfectData Corporation:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference inthe registration statement (No. 333-51774) on Form S-8 of PerfectDataCorporation of our report dated May 9, 2003, with respect to the balance sheetof PerfectData Corporation as of March 31, 2003, and the related statements ofoperations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flowsfor the years ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, which report appears in the March31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of PerfectData Corporation.

 

 

Los Angeles, California 

June 25, 2003

 

 

E-2

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc.

| | WILSHIRE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.
| | --------------------------------------

|Date: May 12, 2003 | /s/   STEPHEN P. GLENNON   
|------------------ | ---------------------------
|                   | Stephen P. Glennon         
|                   | Chief Executive Officer and
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**1065 CA 12-00488**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN NEW YORK CENTRAL MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (“NYCM”), PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
AND ORDER JASMINE MENDEZ, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

BROWN & KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (MARK J. SCHAEFER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. LAW OFFICES OF JAMES MORRIS, BUFFALO (NADEEN C. SINGH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered August 19, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the application of petitioner for a permanent stay of arbitration and denied the application of petitioner for an evidentiary hearing. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on August 7, 2012, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 128092-93 & (111)(116) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128092-93 COA: 248247, 253337 Washtenaw CC: 01-002001-FC MICHAEL DARNELL HARRIS, a/k/a 01-002003-FC MALCOLM HAKEEM ABDUL ALI, a/k/a MICHAEL STIGGLES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Defendant’s motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED. Defendant’s motion for remand for an evidentiary hearing is also DENIED.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40084 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SANTOS RODRIGUEZ

- RIOS, also known as Jua n Miguel Sosa, also known as Jorge Ambriz Garcia , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 6

- 6

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Santos Rodriguez

- Rios (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. T he record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Rodriguez’s claim of ineffective

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40084 Document: 00512473068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 40084

assistance of counsel ; such a claim generally “cannot be reso lved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation mar ks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate revi ew. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40084 Document: 00512473068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

August 14, 2012

No. 11

- 3732

FITZROY GERALD GREEN,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

( Agency No. BIA

- 1: A099

- 232

- 461 )

Present: RENDELL, SMITH and BARRY

, Circuit Judges

1. Motion filed by the Respondent to publish opinion dated 7/13/12.

2. Response in Opposi tion to Motion to Publish filed by Petitioner.

Respectfully,

Clerk/trg

____________________ __ ___________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is GRANTED.

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated : September 12, 2012

trg/cc: Elissa C. Steglich, Esq.

Amelia Wilson, Esq.

Jason Wisecup, Esq.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2063** 

In R e: YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. ( 3:01

- cr - 00177

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : February 11, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Yagoub M. Mohamed , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Yagoub M. Mohamed petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his petition for a writ of error coram nobis
. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act
. Our review of the di strict court’s docket reveals that , on December 31, 2013, the court denied Mohamed’s petition
. Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Mohamed’ s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Mohamed’s motion to expedite the decision . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED