alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2000 and
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended March
31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          29,143
<SECURITIES>                                       356
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,458
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,613
<PP&E>                                          22,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,949
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,381
<SALES>                                         28,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,537
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (544)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,967)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-10-000003421-MAY-201208:36 AM
#### DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### In the Matter of 3202 Owners Corp., Appellant. Billy Contractors, Inc., Respondent.

[811 NYS2d 727]

*716In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of certain claims pursuant to the parties’ construction contract, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated February 16, 2005, as denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is stayed.

The respondent failed to comply with a condition precedent under the arbitration provision of the parties’ construction contract. Thus, the Supreme Court should have granted the petition to stay arbitration *(see Matter of Lakeland Fire Dist. v East Area Gen. Contrs., Inc.,*16 AD3d 417 [2005]).

Pursuant to subparagraph 4.4.1 of the contract, the respondent was required to refer claims arising thereunder to the project architect for resolution. The contract provided that a decision by the architect was a condition precedent to arbitration for all claims arising before the date final payment was due unless 30 days had passed after submission of the claim to the architect without a decision having been made. Pursuant to subparagraph 4.3.1 of the contract, a claim included a demand for the payment of money. Subparagraph 5.2 provided that final payment became due when the architect issued a certificate of payment.

At the time the respondent filed the demand for arbitration, the architect had not issued a certificate of payment and the respondent had not submitted the subject claim to the architect. Accordingly, final payment was not yet due and the respondent was required to submit the claim for payment to the architect for resolution as a condition precedent to arbitration *(see Matter of Lakeland Fire Dist. v East Area Gen. Contrs., Inc., supra).*The respondent’s belated referral of the claim to the architect did not cure the defect *(see Matter of Asphalt Green [Herbert Constr. Co.], 210*AD2d 21 [1994]).

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the part of the claim for brick replacement work relating to Administrative Code of City of New York § 27-129, as amended by Local Law No. 11 (1998) of City of New York, was governed by the arbitration provision *(see Matter of Village of Jordan v Memphis Constr. Co.,*109 AD2d 1055 [1985]). Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Scott D.Peters, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Golf Trust of America, Inc;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| November 14, 2006 | /s/ SCOTT D. PETERS       |
|-------------------|---------------------------|
|              | Scott D. Peters           |
|              | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

----
**Exhibit 13**

** **

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

**Pursuant to 18****U.S.C. § 1350**

 

I, Gail Patricia Kelly, certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 September 2011 of Westpac Banking Corporation (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: 2   November 2011                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                 |
|   |                                                                 |
|   | /s/ Gail Patricia Kelly                                              |
|   | Gail Patricia KellyManaging   Director and   Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

I, Philip Matthew Coffey, certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 30 September 2011 of Westpac Banking Corporation (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
|   | Date: 2   November 2011                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                           |
|   |                                           |
|   | /s/ Philip Matthew Coffey                      |
|   | Philip Matthew CoffeyChief   Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID: USA-2008-0066]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army proposes to delete a system of 
records in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This action will be effective without further notice on October 
31, 2008 unless comments are received that would result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Department of the Army, Records 
Management and Declassification Agency, Privacy Division, 7701 
Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22315.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicki Short at (703) 428-6508.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Army systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of Army proposes to delete a system of records from 
its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the 
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, which requires the submission of new or altered systems 
reports.

    Dated: September 23, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
A0001 SAIS

System name:
    Carpool Information/Registration System (July 27, 1993, 58 FR 
40115).

Reason:
    These records are covered under Government-wide System of Records 
Notice DOT/ALL 8, Employee Transportation Facilitation (April 11, 2000, 
65 FR 19475).

[FR Doc. E8-23010 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### UNITED STATES *of*America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gregory POKE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50327.

D.C. No. CR-00-00132-DOC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Gregory Poke appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for three counts *734of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Poke’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw based on counsel’s failure to discover any arguable issues for review. Poke did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84,109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issues.

We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00361-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. THOMAS DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER

 

 THIS MATTER is before the Court on review of the file and correspondence

received from Warden Marion Feather at the Federal Detention Center, SeaTac,

Seattle, Washington. 

By way of background I note that on February 9, 2012, I ordered that Defendant

be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for a psychiatric or psychological

evaluation for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days unless an extension is requested

and granted. However, Defendant did not arrive at FDC SeaTac for evaluation until

March 12, 2012. On March 22, 2012, on the request of Warden Feather, I ordered that

the 30-days allotted for Defendant’s evaluation begin on March 12, 2012, that the study

period end on April 11, 2012, and that the final report be submitted to the Court no later

than April 25, 2012. 

On April 9, 2012, Warden Feather requested an additional extension of time to

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 31 Filed 04/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

complete Defendant’s evaluation due to voluminous amounts of investigative and

medical records that must be reviewed. 

Upon review of the request and the file in this matter, I find that a 15-day

extension is warranted. Therefore, I find that the evaluation study period shall end on

April 26, 2012, and the final report shall be submitted to the Court no later than May 10,

2012. 

Dated: April 12, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 31 Filed 04/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-20   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 1 of 2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-20   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                        
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|                   |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.             
|                   | 
|Date: May 12, 2008 |  | /S/    TAKEO K.
SASAKI                 
|                   |  | Takeo K. Sasaki Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
#### Lillie DELANEY v. Robt. H. SMITH et al.

No. 2146.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1940.

Argued before LE BLANC and OTT, JJ., and HERMANN MOYSE, Judge ad hoc.

Taylor, Porter & Brooks, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Durrett & Hardin, of Baton Rouge, for ippellee.

HERMANN MOYSE, Judge ad hoc.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the case of Cal Prevost v. Robert H. Smith et al., 197 So. 905, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from in this case be affirmed, appellant to pay all costs.

LE BLANC and OTT, JJ., concur in the decree.

DORE, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Michael S. Shore, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Streicher Mobile
Fueling, Inc.;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

   5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

   Date: November 14, 2003


   /S/ MICHAEL S. SHORE
   -------------------------------------------------
   Michael S. Shore
   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Electronics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
John Waldstein, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN WALDSTEIN                                                                  
|                                                                                       
|John Waldstein President Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                                                                                       
|Dated: November 24, 2003