alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 22, 2022

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Application to Become a Savings and Loan Holding Company or to Acquire a Savings Association or Savings and Loan Holding Company (FR LL-10(e)); initial Board review to extend without revision the Notice of Proposed Declaration of Dividend (FR 1583), Notice Claiming Status as an Exempt Transfer Agent (FR 4013), and Recordkeeping Provisions Associated with the Interagency Statement on Complex Structured Finance Activities (FR 4022); and final Board review to extend with revision the Weekly Report of Selected Assets and Liabilities of Domestically Chartered Commercial Banks and U.S. Branches and Agencies of Foreign Banks (FR 2644) and Disclosure Requirements of Subpart H of Regulation H (Consumer Protection in Sales of Insurance) (FR H-7).            -Approved, January 18, 2022                        Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Report of Selected Money Market Rates (FR 2420).              -Approved, January 18, 2022            Other Actions            U.S. Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) -- discussion paper on the pros and cons of a potential U.S. CBDC and invitation for public comment.            -Published, January 20, 2022            Personnel            Division of Monetary Affairs -- appointment of Andrew Meldrum as assistant director.            -Announced, January 19, 2022            Enforcement            Allegiant United Holdings, LLC; Nano Financial Holdings, Inc.; and Nano Banc, all of Irvine, California -- issuance of a consent cease-and-desist order.            -Announced, January 18, 2022                        Iowa Prairie Bank, Brunsville, Iowa -- written agreement dated April 20, 2021, terminated January 4, 2022.            -Announced, January 18, 2022                        Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York -- consent order of prohibition against Tylifa A. Milton, a former institution-affiliated party.            -Announced, January 20, 2022                        Mariner's Bancorp, Edgewater, New Jersey -- written agreement dated May 25, 2012, terminated January 6, 2022.            -Announced, January 18, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.6

                      Schedule to Form of First Amended and
                            Restated Option Agreement


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
   Project                          Company                              Property                        Management Firm
<S>                            <C>                                   <C>                                 <C>
Hagerstown,                    C&G Healthcare at                     Washington County,                  Balanced Care at
Maryland                       Hagerstown, L.L.C.                    Maryland                            Hagerstown, Inc.

Johnson City,                  C&G Healthcare at                     Washington County,                  Balanced Care at
Tennessee                      Johnson City, L.L.C.                  Tennessee                           Johnson City,
                                                                                                         Inc.

Pensacola,                     C&G Healthcare at                     Escambia County,                    Balanced Care at
Florida                        Pensacola, L.L.C.                     Florida                             Pensacola, Inc.

Tallahassee,                   C&G Healthcare at                     Leo County,                         Balanced Care at
Florida                        Tallahassee, L.L.C.                   Florida                             Tallahassee,
                                                                                                         Inc.

Teay's Valley,                 C&G Healthcare at                     Putnam County,                      Balanced Care at
West Virginia                  Teay's Valley,                        West Virginia                       Teay's Valley,
                               L.L.C.                                                                    Inc.
</TABLE>

                                       1
**Exhibit 99.5**

**Reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP**

We, our and BCE means BCE Inc., its subsidiaries and joint ventures. 

Our annual consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). This reconciliation of Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP should be read inconjunction with our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. We believe that this reconciliation reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the results forthe year shown. Material differences between Canadian GAAP and United States GAAP are quantified and described below: 

1

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 886 

Expressing sympathy to the victims and families of the tragic acts of violence 

in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Arvada, Colorado. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. DEGETTE, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. TANCREDO, and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing sympathy to the victims and families of the tragic 

acts of violence in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Arvada, Colorado. 

Whereas on Sunday December 9, 2007, a man entered the 

New Life Church property with the intent to cause harm 

to members and guests of the church; 

Whereas the attacker shot 5 bystanders at the New Life 

Church, killing 2 of them and injuring 3 others; 

Whereas the shooting resulted in the tragic loss of Stephanie 

Works, 18, and Rachel Works, 16, who lost their lives 

from wounds sustained from shots fired by the attacker; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 886 IH 

Whereas the attacker wounded David Works, who was still 

hospitalized days after the shootings, Judy Purcell, and 

Larry Bourbannais; 

Whereas Jeanne Assam, a volunteer private security guard, 

heroically rushed into harm’s way and used her own gun 

to stop the shooter, thereby saving the lives of several 

other bystanders; 

Whereas, private security, the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, the Colorado Springs Police Department, the Colorado Springs Fire Department, the Colorado Springs 

SWAT Team, Federal authorities, and medical professionals’ quick response limited the danger to the church 

and local community; 

Whereas this event occurred only hours after another tragic 

and fatal shooting at the Youth With A Mission facility 

located in Arvada, Colorado; 

Whereas the shooting at Youth With A Mission resulted in 

the death of Tiffany Johnson, 26, and Philip Crouse, 24; 

Whereas the attacker seriously wounded Dan Griebenow and 

Charlie Blanch; and 

Whereas local first responders in the City of Arvada and Jefferson County Colorado responded quickly and professionally, thereby saving wounded individuals: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives— 

3 (1) offers its heartfelt condolences to the vic4 tims and families of the tragic acts of violence in 

5 Colorado Springs, Colorado and Arvada, Colorado; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 886 IH 

1 (2) conveys its gratitude to Jeanne Assam, city 

2 and county officials, as well as the police, fire, sher3 iff, Federal authorities, and emergency medical 

4 teams whose quick response saved lives; and 

5 (3) reaffirms that New Life Church, Youth 

6 With A Mission, and all other communities and or7 ganizations of faith in our country should be places 

8 of refuge from violence and hatred, and deserve pro9 tection from the same. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending December 16, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodOSB BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       CICInteragency Notice of Change in Bank Control filed by the Bruey Family Control Group, consisting of Paul and Marjorie Bruey, Yorkshire, OH; Barbara and Roger Kremer, Celina, OH; Beatrice and Delbert Balster, Tipp City, OH; Beverly and Dennis Balster, Vandalia, OH; Bridget and John Anthony, Cincinnati, OH; Elizabeth and Robert Poeppelman, Osgood, OH; and Eric Eyink, Maria Stein, OH to retain 10% or more of the outstanding voting shares of OSB Bancorp Inc., Osgood, OH, thereby indirectly controlling Osgood State Bank, Osgood, OH.Newspaper: 01/08/2018Federal Register: 01/05/2018
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1047 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts paid on behalf of Federal employees and members of the Armed 

Forces on active duty under Federal student loan repayment programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts paid on behalf of Federal 

employees and members of the Armed Forces on active 

duty under Federal student loan repayment programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Generating Oppor5 tunity by Forgiving Educational Debt for Service Act of 

6 2007’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 1047 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS BY 

2 THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. 

3 (a) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME.—Section 

4 108(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

5 student loans) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(5) STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENTS BY FED8 ERAL GOVERNMENT.—In the case of an individual, 

9 gross income does not include any payments made 

10 by the Federal Government on behalf of such indi11 vidual under— 

12 ‘‘(A)(i) section 5379 of title 5, United 

13 States Code; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) any other similar Federal program for 

15 its employees; or 

16 ‘‘(B) section 510(e)(2), chapter 109, or 

17 chapter 1609 of title 10, United States Code.’’. 

18 (b) EXCLUSION FROM WAGES.— 

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 3121(a) of such 

20 Code (defining wages) is amended— 

21 (A) in paragraph (21), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

22 the end; 

23 (B) in paragraph (22), by striking the pe24 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

25 (C) by inserting after paragraph (22) the 

26 following: 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•S 1047 IS

1 ‘‘(23) any payment excluded from gross income 

2 under section 108(f)(5) (relating to student loan re3 payments by the Federal Government).’’. 

4 (2) SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.—Section 209(a) of 

5 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 409(a)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(20) Any payment excluded from gross income 

8 under section 108(f)(5) of the Internal Revenue 

9 Code of 1986 (relating to student loan repayments 

10 by Federal Government).’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to payments made on or after the 

13 date of enactment of this Act in taxable years ending after 

14 such date. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
NU HORIZONS ELECTRONICS CORP.



Computation of Per Share Earnings



EXHIBIT 11





|                                                                 |  | For The Year Ended
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|                                                                 |  | February 28, 2003 
|                                                                
|BASIC EARNINGS:                                                  |  |                   
|                                                                
|Net income                                                       |  | $                 
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|SHARES                                                           |  |                   
|                                                                
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             |  |                   
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|Basic earnings per common share                                  |  | $                 
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|DILUTED EARNINGS:                                                |  |                   
|                                                                
|Net income as adjusted                                           |  | $                 
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|SHARES:                                                          |  |                   
|                                                                
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             |  |                   
|                                                                
|Stock options                                                    |  |                   
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding as adjusted |  |                   
|                                                                 |  |                   
|                                                                
|DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE                                |  | $                 
|                                                                 |  |
Exhibit 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Generation Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

                                           /s/ Jacques Mot
                                           -----------------------
                                           Jacques Mot
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           November 26, 2002


                                           /s/ Jacques Mot
                                           -----------------------
                                           Jacques Mot
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           November 26, 2002
178 La. 407

#### LEVY v. LEVY et al.

No. 32532.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 27, 1933.

Ed. J. deVerges, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Joseph Rosenberg, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

ST. PAUL, Justice.

The parties hereto, to wit, the plaintiff, Mrs. Alphonsine L. Levy, and the defendants, Mrs. A. Herbert Levy, Mrs. Mathilde L. Landry, Hypolite Lopes, and Gaston Lopes, are the five heirs of Alphonse S. Lopes; and, as such, were the owners in indivisión of fourteen parcels of real estate appraised at $25,-400, one tomb or burial vault appraised at $60, and personal property appraised at approximately $3,720.35.

On October 31, 1932, Mrs. Alphonsine L. Levy sued all her coheirs for a partition of all the property held in indivisión between them. On January 17, 1933, there was judgment ordering the partition by licitation of’ all the property as aforesaid.

On March 23, 1933, all the parties in interest agreed to partition between themselves in kind the fourteen parcels of real estate and the tomb or burial vault, each of the five parties agreeing to take certain parcels approximately equal in value to their one-fifth share in the aforesaid real'estate; a small adjustment of differences to be made in cash. Tr. 29.

On March 28, 1933, on joint motion of all parties, this agreement was approved and made effective by judgment of court rendered that day; and the judgment of January 17, 1933, was rescinded and set aside as though never rendered, but in so far only as it ordered the sale at public auction of the real estate aforesaid.

*636On May 2, 1933, Mrs. A. Herbert levy and Hypolite Lopes took a rule on Mrs. Alphon-sine L. Levy, Mrs. Mathilde Landry, and Gas-ton Lopes, to show cause why the order recalling the order for the sale of the real estate should not itself be vacated and recalled and the auctioneer directed to proceed with said auction sale; the ground for said rule being, allegedly, “that the said amicable partition cannot be made for the reason that Gaston Lopes, one of the heirs, has unsatisfied judgments against him, and that the said Gaston Lopes has mortgaged his share of this Estate so that an amicable partition is utterly impossible.”

On May 12, 1933, the rule was made absolute in so far as to recall and set aside the (consent) order rendered and signed on March 28, 1933, but dismissing said rule in so far as it seeks to have reinstated the original judgment of partition rendered on January 17, 1933.

Whereupon Mrs. Alphonsine Levy and Gas-ton Lopes took an appeal.

Thereupon Mrs. A. Herbert Levy moved to dismiss the appeal so taken on the ground that same was taken from an interlocutory decree and not from, a final judgment.

We see no force in the motion to dismiss. The consent judgment of March 28,1933, was certainly a final judgment, and a judgment which sets aside a final judgment is necessarily itself a final judgment; since, if undisturbed on appeal, it disposes at once and forever of the judgment which it sets aside.

Eor the reasons assigned the motion to dismiss is denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-09-JD

Joseph Delgado, et al.

O R D E R

The Clerk shall reassign this case to another judge as I

have, on this date, retained a member of the firm of Orr & Reno

to represent me in a personal matter.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: May 6, 2009

cc: Terry L. Ollila, Esquire

Michael D. Ramsdell, Esquire

Michael J. Sheehan, Esquire

Case 1:09-cr-00009-PB Document 20 Filed 05/06/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1




                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                                 TBC CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                         State of Incorporation /
                Name of Subsidiary                            Organization
                ------------------                       ------------------------
                <S>                                      <C>
                Big O Tires, Inc.                                Nevada

                Big O Tire of Idaho, Inc.                        Idaho

                Carroll's, Inc.                                  Georgia

                Merchant's, Incorporated                         Delaware

                NTW Incorporated                                 Delaware

                TBC Brands, LLC                                  Delaware

                TBC Capital, LLC                                 Delaware

                TBC International Inc.                           Delaware

                TBC Retail Enterprises, Inc.                     Delaware

                Tire Kingdom, Inc.                               Florida

</TABLE>


Certain other subsidiaries have not been listed because they would not, if
considered in the aggregate as one subsidiary, constitute a "significant
subsidiary," as defined in Rule 1.02(w) of Regulation S-X.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

ISONICS CORPORATION

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Principal Executive Officer

 

To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, containing financial statements for the periodthen ended, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in theForm 10-QSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

 

 

September 15, 2003

 

 
| /s/ James E.  Alexander              |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| James E.  Alexander, Chief Executive |
| Officer                              |

 

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Principal Financial Officer

 

To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, containing financial statements for the periodthen ended, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in theForm 10-QSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

 

 

September 15, 2003

 

 
| /s/ John  Sakys                      |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| John Sakys,  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----