alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LARSCOM INCORPORATED FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           25530
<SECURITIES>                                     23722
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11428
<ALLOWANCES>                                       129
<INVENTORY>                                      11483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 77873
<PP&E>                                           15294
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   84402
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                       72137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     84402
<SALES>                                          54894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 54894
<CGS>                                            23815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1277)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9893
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3561
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               6332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the Annual Report of SPO Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Michael Braunold, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






March 31,
2009





/s/
      Michael BraunoldMichael
      BraunoldChief
      Executive Officer






A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
SPO MEDICAL INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SPO MEDICAL INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard E. Gathright                                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard      E. Gathright                                                                            |
| Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)                                                                   |
| November      12, 2009                                                                               |
|                                                                                                 |
| /s/ Michael S. Shore                                                                                 |
| Michael      S. Shore                                                                                |
| Chief      Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President                                    |
| (Principal      Financial Officer)                                                                   |
| November      12, 2009                                                                               |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
BALANCE SHEET AT JUN-30-1999 AND STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR YEAR ENDED JUN-30-1999.</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1


<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           1,105
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,105
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        1,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,800
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                    5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (373,318)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         1,105
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  90
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (90)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02205-WJM-MEH

GEORGE TRUJILLO, and

MITZI TRUJILLO,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS

______________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss (ECF

No. 56), filed July 24, 2014. The Court having reviewed the Motion hereby ORDERS as

follows:

The Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED. The

claims against BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP are hereby DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay their or its own attorney’s fees and costs.

Dated this 28th day of July, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02205-WJM-MEH Document 57 Filed 07/28/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               2,054,014
<SECURITIES>                                         1,954,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                        6,962,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (192,602)
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,248,757
<PP&E>                                               9,685,785
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (3,817,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19,977,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,578,755
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                78,210
<OTHER-SE>                                          16,506,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19,977,401
<SALES>                                                165,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11,842,615
<CGS>                                                  283,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,623,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,176,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      85,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (871,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (871,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (871,412)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.11)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Emray Realty Corp., Petitioner, against Herman C. Stoute, as Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 30, 1957.

*866
      *Arnold Schildhaus*for petitioner.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Barnett Levy*of counsel), for respondent.

Aron Steuer, J.

The petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition against respondent, a Municipal Court Judge, to prevent the latter from hearing an application brought on by order to show cause signed by the respondent. The order to show cause was issued in a summary proceeding for eviction for nonpayment of rent. The trial of that proceeding had been completed and a final order and eviction warrant had been issued. Under these circumstances there cannot be much doubt that the Municipal Court lost jurisdiction and that it was error to sign the order and any order subsequent to it would be a nullity.

It remains to be seen whether prohibition is the correct remedy. It was the rule of the common law that where an absence of jurisdiction appeared that prohibition was an absolute right (see High on “Extraordinary Legal Remedies ” [3d ed.], § 773). But in early times, if not the earliest, doubts crept in as to whether this statement iterated for years in criminal cases had equal application in civil cases. However that may be today the matter is regulated by statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1285). Exempted from the relief of prohibition are determinations in civil actions made in a court of record where an adequate review by appeal is available. The motion is denied.
#### In the Matter of Female D., Also Known as Ebony D., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. St. Vincent’s Services, Respondent; Winthrop W., Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 891]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from a fact-finding and dispositional order (one paper) of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated December 19, 2000, which, after fact-finding and dispositional *409hearings, terminated his parental rights on the ground that he had permanently neglected his child Female D., also known as Ebony D., and transferred custody of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and the petitioner for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the fact-finding and dispositional order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution was violated because the mother was offered a judicial surrender of her parental rights *(see*Social Services Law § 383-c [3]), while he was not offered a similar opportunity to execute a judicial surrender. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: WILLIAM ROBERT NORRIE, 

 Debtor.

______________________________ 

WILLIAM ROBERT NORRIE, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

KELLY MALLEN, 

Appellee.

No. 18-55550 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-08522-AB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 15, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor William Robert Norrie appeals pro se from the district 

court’s order dismissing his bankruptcy appeal for failure to comply with court 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-55550 

orders and failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) 

and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 

639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Norrie’s appeal

after Norrie failed to file the documents required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 

Procedure 8009, despite the district court’s warning that noncompliance may result 

in dismissal. See id. at 640-43 (discussing factors to be considered before 

dismissing a case for failure to comply with a court order; a district court’s 

dismissal should not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it 

“committed a clear error or judgment” (citations and internal quotation marks 

omitted); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992) (this court may 

review the record independently if the district court does not make explicit findings 

to show its consideration of the factors).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Norrie’s motion for 

reconsideration because Norrie failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See Fed. 

R. Bankr. P. 9023, 9024 (making Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 and 60 applicable to 

bankruptcy cases); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 

1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for relief

under Rule 59 or 60).

Norrie’s request for judicial notice, included at Docket Entry No. 6, is 
3 18-55550 

denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF ZAP POWER  SYSTEMS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
         MARCH 31,  1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                             370,036      
<SECURITIES>                             0      
<RECEIVABLES>                      164,123      
<ALLOWANCES>                        (5,000)     
<INVENTORY>                        313,878      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   944,896      
<PP&E>                             331,961      
<DEPRECIATION>                    (141,755)     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   1,168,265      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              185,201      
<BONDS>                              3,661      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0      
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                         3,373,276        
<OTHER-SE>                      (2,477,347)       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       895,929        
<SALES>                            461,200        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   468,500        
<CGS>                              269,600        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      353,800        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    (5,000)       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   2,700        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (160,400)       
<INCOME-TAX>                             0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (160,400)       
<DISCONTINUED>                           0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0        
<CHANGES>                                0        
<NET-INCOME>                      (160,400)       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.06)       
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.06)       
                                                    
                                

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.31




AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO




FOREBEARANCE AND WARRANT
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of May
6, 2009 (this “Amendment”), to that certain forbearance and waiver modification
agreement, dated February 25, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and between NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), and
CHRISTOPHER C. DEWEY
(the “Lender “).





W I T N E S S E T
H




WHEREAS, as of the date hereof there is
currently a principal amount of $500,000 due the Lender; and




WHEREAS,
the Company and the Lender wish to amend the Agreement on the terms set forth
herein.




NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises herein
contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Agreement
as follows:




1.           Definitions; References;
Continuation of Agreement.  Unless otherwise specified herein,
each term used herein that is defined in the Agreement shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the Agreement.  Each reference to “hereof,”
“hereto,” “hereunder,” “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference,
and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference,
contained in the Agreement shall from and after the date hereof refer to the
Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as amended hereby, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall continue unmodified and remain in full force
and effect.  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
having the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




2.           Amendment.  Section
3 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: the date “May 1, 2009” is
hereby deleted and in its place and stead the date “May 12, 2009” is
inserted.




3.           Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken
together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become
effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the
other party, it being understood that both parties need not sign the same
counterpart.  In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile
transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature
shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose
behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such
facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original thereof.





4.           Governing
Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed on the date first above written.




NATIONAL HOLDINGS
CORPORATION









By: /S/ MARK
GOLDWASSSER


Mark Goldwasser, CEO








/S/ CHRISTOPHER C.
DEWEY


Christopher C. Dewey
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Stephen P. Marsh


Stephen P. Marsh, President & Chief Executive Officer





March 30, 2010
**EXHIBIT — 23**
**Consent of Experts and Counsel**
**Consent of Independent Auditors**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 33-44423) pertaining to the 1991 Long-term Incentive Plan, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56403) pertaining to the 1994 Long-termIncentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36743)pertaining to the 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan of Milacron Inc., and in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70733) pertaining to the Milacron Inc.Plan for the Deferral of Director’s Compensation, of our report dated February10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Milacron Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio