alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.43


                      ADDENDUM TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE AND
                        WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK

This  Addendum to  Convertible  Debenture  and Warrant to Purchase  Common Stock
(Addendum")  is entered into as of the _____ day of February 2004 by and between
DNAPrint  Genomics,  Inc.,  a  Utah  corporation  ("DNAP"),  and La  Jolla  Cove
Investors, Inc., a California corporation ("LJCI").

WHEREAS,  LJCI and DNAP are  parties to that  certain 8%  Convertible  Debenture
dated as of November 25, 2003 ("Debenture"); and

WHEREAS,  LJCI and DNAP are parties to that certain  Warrant to Purchase  Common
Stock dated as of November 25, 2003 ("Warrant"); and

WHEREAS,  the  parties  desire to amend the  Debenture  and  Warrant  in certain
respects.

NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein,  and  for  other  good  and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt  and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, DNAP and LJCI agree as follows:

1.   All terms  used  herein and not  otherwise  defined  herein  shall have the
     definitions set forth in the Debenture.

2.   In the event  that LJCI does not  convert  at least 5% of the face value of
     the  Debenture  and exercise at least 5% of the Warrants in any  particular
     calendar  month,  LJCI may wire to DNAP  $375,000 less the dollar amount of
     Warrants  exercised in that month within 5 business  days of the end of the
     month.  Should LJCI fail to wire DNAP such funds,  LJCI shall be subject to
     the penalties set forth in section  3.1(a) of the Debenture and section 1.1
     of the  Warrant.  Any such  amounts  wired to DNAP  shall be  considered  a
     prepayment  toward the future  exercise of  Warrants,  to be applied to the
     earliest Warrant payment amounts that are due from LJCI to DNAP.

3.   When the Debenture Principal Amount declines below $100,000,  LJCI shall be
     permitted, for a period of 30 days, to add up to $250,000 of the additional
     principal  to the  Debenture,  on the  same  terms  and  conditions  as the
     Debenture, except that such additional principal shall bear interest at 2%.

4.   Except as specifically  amended  herein,  all other terms and conditions of
     the Debenture and Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  DNAP and LJCI have caused this Addendum to be signed by its
duly authorized officers on the date first set forth above.

DNAPrint Genomics, Inc.                          La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.

By: ________________________                     By: ___________________________

Name: ______________________                     Name: _________________________

Title: _____________________                     Title: ________________________
**EXHIBIT 10.22**

 

Summary of Arrangements with Certain Executives 

 

The following is a summary of the salary and bonus compensation arrangements between the Company and certain of itsexecutives (“Executives”). 

 

Gary W. Rada iscurrently paid base salary at an annual rate of $420,000 and has a target bonus under the Company’s incentive bonus plan arrangement filed as exhibit 10.20 to this Form 10-Q equal to 70% of his annual base salary. Mr. Rada is entitled to thebenefits and severance provisions included in his employment agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.9 to this Form 10-Q. 

 

Timothy F. Gower is currently paid base salary at an annual rate of $251,000 and has a target bonus under the Company’s incentive bonus planarrangement equal to 40% of his annual base salary. Mr. Gower is entitled to the benefits and severance provisions included in his employment agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.8 to this Form 10-Q. 

 

Each of the Executives is also eligible to participate in certain of theCompany’s equity incentive plans that have been filed as exhibits to the Company’s periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WorldHeart Corporation(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Richard Juelis, Vice President, Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to myknowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of June 30, 2005.
| Dated:  August 9, 2005 | /s/ *                                         |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                   | Richard  Juelis, Vice President, Finance      |
|                   | and  Chief Financial Officer                  |
|                   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

**__________________**

*******                **A signed original of this written statement requiredby section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
H. Res. 916 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 23, 2008. 

Whereas America’s Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior scholastic education; 

Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values in America’s young 

people; 

Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 

2006–2007 academic year was more than 2,300,000 and 

the student-teacher ratio was 15 to 1; 

Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students; 

Whereas more than 25 percent of school children enrolled in 

Catholic schools are from minority backgrounds, and 

nearly 14 percent are non-Catholics; 

Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated 

to their faith, values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually stimulating environment rich in 

spiritual, character, and moral development; 

Whereas the Catholic high school graduation rate is 99 percent, with 80 percent of graduates attending four-year 

colleges and 17 percent attending two-year colleges or 

technical schools; 
2 

•HRES 916 EH 

Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic 

education, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops 

stated: ‘‘Education is one of the most important ways by 

which the Church fulfills its commitment to the dignity 

of the person and building of community. Community is 

central to education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently desired goal. The educational efforts 

of the Church, therefore, must be directed to forming 

persons-in-community; for the education of the individual 

Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, 

but also the destinies of the many communities in which 

he lives.’’; and 

Whereas January 27 to February 2, 2008, has been designated as Catholic Schools Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an 

event co-sponsored by the National Catholic Educational 

Association and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to recognize the vital contributions of America’s thousands of Catholic elementary 

and secondary schools; and 

(2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers across the Nation for their ongoing 

contributions to education, and for the key role they play 
3 

•HRES 916 EH 

in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger future 

for this Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2063

In Re: YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(3:01-cr-00177-REP-1)

Submitted: February 11, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yagoub M. Mohamed, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yagoub M. Mohamed petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on 

his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. He seeks an order 

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review 

of the district court’s docket reveals that, on December 31, 

2013, the court denied Mohamed’s petition. Accordingly, because 

the district court recently decided Mohamed’s case, we deny the 

mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and deny Mohamed’s motion to expedite the decision. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Gagalis

v. Case No. 08-cv-269-PB

 

United States of America

O R D E R

On July 21, 2009, I issued an oral order determining that

Robert Gagalis had abandoned his right to challenge his sentence 

by entering into an appeal and collateral review waiver. (Doc.

No. 24 at 223-233 (reproduced as Appendix A)). Gagalis seeks

permission to challenge this ruling in a motion for certificate

of appealability. 

In denying Gagalis’s motion, I found that his appeal and

collateral review waiver was valid and enforceable. I rejected

Gagalis’s argument that the advice he received from counsel

concerning the waiver was affected in any way by an impermissible

conflict of interest. I also rejected Gagalis’s argument that

enforcement of the waiver would result in a miscarriage of

justice because it would deny him the opportunity to prove that

he had received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. In

Case 1:08-cv-00269-PB Document 32 Filed 10/27/09 Page 1 of 3
-2-

reaching this conclusion, I received evidence with respect to

Gagalis’s underlying ineffective assistance of counsel claim and

concluded that denying him the opportunity to prove his claim

would not result in a miscarriage of justice because Gagalis

could not prove that his lawyers were subject to an actual

conflict of interest that adversely affected their performance at

trial. I based my ruling upon well-established case law that

governs both the enforceability of appeal and collateral review

waivers, see, e.g., United States v. Edelen, 539 F.3d 83, 87 (1st

Cir. 2008), and ineffective assistance of counsel claims based on

an asserted conflict of interest, see, e.g., United States v.

Ramirez-Benitez, 292 F.3d 22, 30 (1st Cir. 2002). 

Gagalis does not explain how I misinterpreted the applicable 

case law, nor does he call into question the fact-finding that

underlies my ruling. In short, he does not come close to

demonstrating that a reasonable jurist could disagree with my

ruling that he is barred from challenging his sentence by the

appeal and collateral review waiver. Accordingly, I deny

Gagalis’s motion for a certificate of appealability (Doc. No.

30). 

Case 1:08-cv-00269-PB Document 32 Filed 10/27/09 Page 2 of 3
-3-

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 27, 2009

cc: Stephen M. Rasche, Esq.

Michael Artan, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00269-PB Document 32 Filed 10/27/09 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,868,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,868,949
<PP&E>                                         836,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,701,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          367,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,333,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,701,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.43
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1532 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1532

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 
               gross income of Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Citizens Tax Elimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SOCIAL SECURITY 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to social security benefits) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Termination.--This section shall not apply to any taxable 
year beginning after the date of the enactment of this subsection.''
    (b) Social Security Trust Funds Held Harmless.--
            (1) In general.--There are hereby appropriated (out of any 
        money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated) for each 
        fiscal year to each fund under the Social Security Act or the 
        Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 an amount equal to the 
        reduction in the transfers to such fund for such fiscal year by 
        reason of section 86(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
            (2) No tax increases.--It is the sense of the Congress that 
        tax increases will not be used to provide the revenue necessary 
        to carry out paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
#### MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GULF REFINING COMPANY et al., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3933.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 28, 1955.

Mouton, Champagne *& Colomb, Lafayette,*for appellant.

Lawes, Hickman & Brame, Lake Charles, for appellee.

TATE, Judge.

This suit under LSA-R.S. *23:1101*against alleged third party tortfeasors and their liability insurers is for reimbursement of the sum of $3,520.80 paid by plaintiff in workmen’s compensation benefits and medical expenditures to an employee of its assured. From judgment sustaining an exception of no right of action, plaintiff prosecuted an appeal to this court.

Since this suit is for indemnity in an amount exceeding $2,000 and is not for compensation or for damages for physical injuries, appellate jurisdiction is vested not in this court, but in the Supreme Court; Article 7, Section 10, LSA-Constitution of 1921; Coal Operators Cas. Co. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York, La.App., 59 So.2d 502, transferring a similar appeal to Supreme Court, later reported at 223 La. 794, 66 So.2d 852.

For the foregoing reasons the appeal is ordered transferred to the Honorable the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and plaintiff is allowed 60 days from the final date of this judgment in which to perfect the appeal by filing proper transcript in said Court; otherwise the appeal shall be considered as dismissed. Plaintiff-appellant to pay the costs of this appeal. All other costs to await final determination of this cause.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 3, 2022

----

Forms            Forms -- final Board review to extend with revision the Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9 reports).            -Approved, September 1, 2022            Enforcement            HSBC Holdings plc, London, United Kingdom -- cease-and-desist order dated December 11, 2012, terminated August 26, 2022.            -Announced, September 1, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Ryder Scott Company
Petroleum Consultants

1100 Louisiana                                         Fax (713) 651-0849
Suite 3800  Houston, TX  77002-5218              Telephone (713) 651-9191






                      CONSENT OF PETROLEUM CONSULTING FIRM




      We consent to the  reference to our name included in this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2000 for Dyco Oil and Gas Program
1982-2 Limited Partnership.



                                    //s// Ryder Scott Company, L.P.

                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.






Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1077 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1077

           To safely redeploy United States troops from Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2007

 Mr. Feingold (for himself, Mr. Reid, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Kerry, 
 Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Harkin, and Mr. Sanders) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

Rule___________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To safely redeploy United States troops from Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    (a) Transition of Mission.--The President shall promptly transition 
the mission of United States forces in Iraq to the limited purposes set 
forth in subsection (d).
    (b) Commencement of Safe, Phased Redeployment From Iraq.--The 
President shall commence the safe, phased redeployment of United States 
forces from Iraq that are not essential to the limited purposes set 
forth in subsection (d). Such redeployment shall begin not later than 
120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Prohibition on Use of Funds.--No funds appropriated or 
otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or 
expended to continue the deployment in Iraq of members of the United 
States Armed Forces after March 31, 2008.
    (d) Exception for Limited Purposes.--The prohibition under 
subsection (c) shall not apply to the obligation or expenditure of 
funds for the limited purposes as follows:
            (1) To conduct targeted operations, limited in duration and 
        scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international 
        terrorist organizations.
            (2) To provide security for United States infrastructure 
        and personnel.
            (3) To train and equip Iraqi security services.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-72]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-72 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 25, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,  Department of Defense.

      ( print page 58189)          ( print page 58190)          ( print page 58191)          ( print page 58192)          ( print page 58193)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-23352 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C