alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00349-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JOSHUA COLE JOHNSON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#24) on January 3, 2012, by Defendant. The Court construes this Notice as a motion to change

his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for March 5, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. and a Sentencing

hearing is set for May 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the United States District Court

for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse,

901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for January 13, 2012, and the January

Case 1:11-cr-00349-MSK Document 25 Filed 01/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
17, 2012, trial date are VACATED.

Dated this 4th day of January, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00349-MSK Document 25 Filed 01/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending June 1, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodPOPULAR BANK                                                                                                            * BranchPopular Bank, New York, New York, to establish a branch office to be located at 1979 Ralph Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11234.Newspaper: 06/07/2019Federal Register: Not applicable
#### Hummell *v.*Mercier. (Two Cases.)

(Nos. 24456 and 24457

— Decided March 14, 1934.)

*Messrs. King, Flynn & Frohman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Krueger, Bosino & Moore,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and. the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of *Wyant*v. *Russell,*109 Ohio St., 167, for the reason that the record discloses that the Municipal Court of Sandusky rendered judgment as of May 25, 1932, which judgment was entered on the civil docket of that court as required by law and was not vacated, and the limitation for perfecting appeal ran from the judgment of May 25, 1932.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Curella, Appellant.

[746 NYS2d 30]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Leavitt, J.), rendered May 18, 1998, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error when, in its charge on burglary in the first degree *(see*Penal Law § 140.30 [2]), it failed to redact the language “or remain [ed]” from the element, “enter [ed] or remain [ed] unlawfully.” This issue is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Rumph,*38 NY2d 989, 991; *People v Lafond,*213 AD2d 678). In any event, reversal is not warranted. The prosecution proceeded upon the sole theory that the defendant had unlawfully entered the home of the complainant with intent to commit a crime therein. During his testimony, the defendant presented no facts that could “lead to the conclusion that intent to commit the crime was formed after his unlawful entry” *(People v Fenderson,*203 AD2d 585, 586). It is “[therefore * * * unlikely that the jury was misled by the court’s charge” and no reversible error was committed especially where, as here, the record reveals no evidence that the jury was confused by that particular portion of the charge *(People v Fenderson, supra*at 586).

Additionally, the defendant claims that his conviction of as*579sault in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.05 [6]), should be dismissed pursuant to CPL 300.40 (3) (b) as an inclusory concurrent count of his conviction of burglary in the first degree (see Penal Law § 140.30 [2]). The charge of assault requires proof of the infliction of physical injury “in furtherance of’ the underlying felony of burglary. This element is not required to prove the burglary charge. “Thus, the assault was not a ‘lesser offense * * * included within the greater’ ” *(People v Abrew, 95*NY2d 806, 809, quoting CPL 300.30 [4]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21


                               A.G. EDWARDS, INC.

                            REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES


   The following listing includes the registrant's directly-owned subsidiaries
and indirectly-owned subsidiaries (certain subsidiaries which are not
significant are omitted from the listing), all of which are included in the
consolidated financial statements:

                                                 State of
                                              Incorporation/
Name of Company                               Organization      Subsidary of

A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (Edwards)               Delaware     Registrant
 The Ceres Investment Company                     Missouri     Edwards
 Indianapolis Historic Partners                   Indiana      Edwards
AGE Commodity Clearing Corp.                      Delaware     Registrant
A.G. Edwards Life Insurance Company               Missouri     Registrant
Edwards Development Corporation                   Missouri     Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company (Missouri Trust)       Missouri     Registrant
 A.G. Edwards Asset Performance Monitor, Inc.     Missouri     Missouri Trust
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                        New Jersey   Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                        Texas        Registrant
A.G. Edwards Trust Company                        Florida      Registrant
A.G.E. Properties, Inc. (Properties)              Missouri     Registrant
 A.G.E. Realty Corp.                              Missouri     Properties
 A.G.E. Redevelopment Corporation                 Missouri     Properties
GULL-AGE Capital Group, Inc.                      Delaware     Registrant
AGE Investments, Inc.                             Delaware     Registrant
----

----

|        Exhibit      32.2                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                             |
| Certification Pursuant      to18 U.S.C.      Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to |
| Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of      2002                                |

| 1      | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2      | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

----
#### Jose Correa, Respondent, v Henry Tscherne et al., Appellants.

[745 NYS2d 471]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated June 5, 2001, which denied their motion to vacate a conditional order of preclusion of the same court, dated August 28, 2000, and granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to strike their answer and set the matter down for an inquest.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court issued a conditional order of preclusion on August 28, 2000, granting the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendants’ answer unless the defendants complied with certain discovery demands. The defendants did not submit any papers in opposition to the motion. In moving to vacate their default four months later, the defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to oppose the motion and a meritorious defense (see *Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks,*282 AD2d *741; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,*238 AD2d 568). The Supreme Court properly denied the motion, as the defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see *Scoca v Bon Realty Corp.,*284 AD2d 388).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to strike the defendants’ answer. As a result of the defendants’ failure to fully comply with the conditional order of preclusion, that conditional order became absolute (see *Jenkinson v Naccarato,*286 AD2d 420; *Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks, supra).*The defendants failed to meet their burden of demonstrating a reasonable excuse for their failure to comply (see *Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks,*supra;*First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. of Rochester v 1220 Richmond Rd. Corp.,*123 AD2d 418). O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT E(2)

                             MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

         This  Modification  Agreement  by and  between  China  Food &  Beverage
Company  ("China") and  Tiancheng  (China) Co.,  Ltd.  ("Tiancheng")  made as of
December 31, 1998.

         WHEREAS,  China and Tiancheng entered into a certain Trust Agreement on
December 17, 1997; and

         WHEREAS, Tiancheng and China wish to modify the terms thereof.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and promises contained
herein the signatory parties agree hereto as follows:

         1. Paragraph 4 of the Trust Agreement is modified to read as follows:

            "Party  A  (China)  has  agreed  to Party B  (Tiancheng)  the sum of
            $150,000 as partial payment for Tiancheng's services as set forth in
            the Trust Agreement.  Of such $150,000,  $92,000 has been paid as of
            the date hereof and Tiancheng  acknowledges  receipt of such amount.
            China shall also deliver to Tiancheng  500,000  shares of its common
            stock which number of shares has been  delivered  to  Tiancheng  and
            Tiancheng  specifically  acknowledges receipt thereof.  Such 500,000
            shares shall not be, when delivered,  be free of restrictive  legend
            and  Tiancheng  waives  its  rights  to  have  "marketable   shares"
            delivered to it.  Additionally,  Tiancheng waives its rights to have
            such  500,000  shares have a value of not less than  $2,500,000  and
            accepts the shares  previously  delivered  in the form as  delivered
            plus the $92,000 as full compensation  from its services;  provided,
            however,  that China still owes to  Tiancheng  the sum of $58,000 to
            fulfill its obligations under the Trust Agreement."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seal the first
day, month and year above written.

                       CHINA FOOD & BEVERAGE COMPANY

                       By:  /s/ James Tilton
                       ---------------------------------
                            James Tilton, President

                       TIANCHENG (CHINA) CO., LTD.

                       By:  /s/ Wang Qingzhang
                       ---------------------------------
                            Wang Qingzhang, President


                                       29
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


November 14, 2006                       /s/ Richard J. Lampen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard J. Lampen
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 919 

Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the Alltech FEI World 

Equestrian Games 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. WHITFIELD of Kentucky, and Mr. DAVIS of 

Kentucky) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the 

Alltech FEI World Equestrian Games 2010. 

Whereas there are 320,000 horses and nearly 200,000 owners, employees, and volunteers involved in the horse industry in Kentucky, providing nearly 52,000 jobs; 

Whereas the horse industry is an approximately 

$3,500,000,000 industry in Kentucky, making it the 

largest segment of the State’s agricultural sector; 

Whereas the Alltech FEI Games 2010 comprise the most 

prestigious competition in the equestrian world; 

Whereas the Games feature show jumping, dressage, 

eventing, driving, endurance, vaulting, reining, and paraequestrian events; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 919 IH 

Whereas the Games occur only once every 4 years, and 2010 

will mark the first time the Games are held outside Europe; 

Whereas as many as 800 competitors representing 50 countries will attend the 2010 Games; 

Whereas more than 1,000 national and international media 

outlets will televise the Games in 180 countries; 

Whereas the Kentucky Horse Park is the only single venue 

in the world that can accommodate the entire Games; 

and 

Whereas the Games will provide significant economic benefit 

for Kentucky, with an estimated $100,000,000 in revenue: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Kentucky on being selected to host the Alltech 

3 FEI World Equestrian Games 2010. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02315-RPM

MICHAEL VAN DE WEGHE,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROL CHAMBERS, District Attorney, 18th Judicial District, in her official capacity;

JAY WILLIFORD, Deputy District Attorney, 18th Judicial District, in his personal capacity;

DETECTIVE GREGORY HOWDEN, Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, in his personal

capacity; and

DEPUTY JASON WALTER, Douglas County Sheriff’s Office, in his personal capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of District Attorney Chambers and Deputy District Attorney

Williford’s Unopposed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Determination of Eleventh

Amendment and Absolute Immunity [20] filed May 1, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted.

DATED: May 3rd, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02315-RPM Document 21 Filed 05/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita FoodProducts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedJune 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the dateindicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14, 2006  |   | /s/ Stephen D.  Rubin                            |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Stephen D.  Rubin,                               |
|                   |   | Office of the  Chief Executive; President        |
|                   |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |
|                   |   |                                             |
|                   |   |                                             |
| Date: August 14,  2006 |   | /s/ Clifford K.  Bolen                           |
|                   |   | Clifford K.  Bolen,                              |
|                   |   | Office of the  Chief Executive;                  |
|                   |   | Senior Vice  President; Chief Operating Officer; |
|                   |   | Chief Financial  Officer                         |
|                   |   | (Principal  Executive and Financial Officer)     |
|                   |   |                                             |
|                   |   |                                             |
| Date: August 14,  2006 |   | /s/ Terry W.  Hess                               |
|                   |   | Terry W. Hess,                                   |
|                   |   | Office of the  Chief Executive;                  |
|                   |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                   |

 

23

----
|Exhibit 32.2                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|Certification Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
|Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                          

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cannabis Science, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended Septemer 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. Robert Melamede, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Dr. Robert Melamede Dr. Robert MelamedeChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerNovember 20, 2013



|
|
|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 962 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 962

     Congratulating the city of Inglewood, California on its 100th 
   anniversary and commending the city for its growth and resilience.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

 Ms. Waters submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Congratulating the city of Inglewood, California on its 100th 
   anniversary and commending the city for its growth and resilience.

Whereas the city of Inglewood is proud to celebrate its 100th anniversary as an 
        incorporated city;
Whereas the centennial is a milestone reflecting hard work and accomplishment 
        made possible by a dedicated community;
Whereas over the years, the city of Inglewood has grown and flourished from what 
        was once considered a sleepy settlers' town into a thriving and vibrant 
        metropolitan community with booming business and a demonstrated 
        commitment to providing public services and community outreach, 
        supporting economic development, and providing housing to the community;
Whereas this proud city, and the community members and staff who support it, 
        proudly accept the challenge to better and grow a thriving city;
Whereas in light of the theme ``Cherishing our Past, Embracing our Future'', the 
        city of Inglewood envisions a centennial that celebrates Inglewood's 
        rich legacy and provides opportunities for the community to come 
        together, and to learn and appreciate the city's magnificent heritage;
Whereas the city also looks forward to welcoming another 100 years of success 
        through community spirit, unity, and dedication;
Whereas the centennial will be the biggest celebration Inglewood has held since 
        the year of incorporation in 1908, at which time the population was 
        1,200;
Whereas today, Inglewood continues to grow with a population of 120,000 and over 
        11,000 businesses; and
Whereas the city appreciates and is grateful for the positive and dynamic 
        elements of the community including residents, students, artists, 
        educational institutions, businesses, community service organizations, 
        houses of worship, and neighborhood associations who have helped make 
        Inglewood the ``City of Champions'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives 
congratulates the City of Inglewood, California on its 100th 
anniversary and commends the city for its growth and resilience.
                                 <all>
```