alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57245-57246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

36 CFR Part 1228

[FDMS Docket NARA-07-0004]
RIN 3095-AB43


Federal Records Management; Media Neutral Schedules

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulations, 
which were published in the Federal Register of Thursday, November 15, 
2007 (72 FR 64155). The regulations allowed agencies to make new 
Federal records schedules and certain existing approved records 
schedules applicable to series of records regardless of the medium in 
which the records are created and maintained.

DATES: October 2, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura McCarthy at 301-837-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction made 
new Federal records schedules media neutral unless otherwise specified 
and allowed schedules previously approved for hard copy records to be 
applied to electronic versions of the files if certain conditions are 
met. The regulation applies to all Federal agencies, including the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain an error in Sec.  
1228.24(b)(3); the paragraph requires an effective date and not the 
instruction to use the effective date of the rule.

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 1228

    Archives and records.

0
Accordingly, 36 CFR part 1228 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1228-DISPOSITION OF FEDERAL RECORDS

0
1. The authority citation for part 1228 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 57246]]


    Authority: 44 U.S.C. chs. 21, 29, and 33.


0
2. In Sec.  1228.24, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  1228.24  Formulation of agency records schedules.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) Records schedules submitted to NARA for approval on or after 
December 17, 2007, are media neutral, i.e., the disposition 
instructions apply to the described records in all media, unless the 
schedule identifies a specific medium for a specific series.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 25, 2008.
Adrienne C. Thomas,
Deputy Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E8-23379 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                  SCHEDULE TO FORM OF HCRI MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
           PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 MANAGEMENT      LEASEHOLD       LESSOR          LESSOR'S        LOCATION
                 FIRM            TENANT                          STATE OF        
                                                                 INCORPORATION   
<S>              <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
LEBANON,         Balanced        Financial       Pennsylvania    Pennsylvania    Lebanon
PENNSYLVANIA     Care at         Care            BCC                             County,
                 Lebanon, Inc.   Investors of    Properties,                     Pennsylvania
                                 Lebanon, LLC    Inc.                            

LOYALSOCK,       Balanced        Financial       Pennsylvania    Pennsylvania    Lycoming
PENNSYLVANIA     Care at         Care            BCC                             County,
                 Loyalsock,      Investors of    Properties,                     Pennsylvania
                 Inc.            Loyalsock,      Inc.                            
                                 LLC                                             

WESTERVILLE,     Balanced        Financial       HCN BCC         Delaware        Franklin
OHIO             Care at         Care            Holdings,                       County, Ohio
                 Westerville,    Investors of    Inc.                            
                 Inc.            Westerville,                                    
                                 LLC                                             

MORRISTOWN,      Balanced        Financial       HCN BCC         Delaware        Hamblen
TENNESSEE        Care at         Care            Holdings,                       County,
                 Morristown,     Investors of    Inc.                            Tennessee
                 Inc.            Morristown,                                     
                                 LLC                                             

OAK RIDGE,       Balanced        Financial       HCN BCC         Delaware        Anderson
TENNESSEE        Care at Oak     Care            Holdings,                       County,
                 Ridge, Inc.     Investors of    Inc.                            Tennessee
                                 Oak Ridge,                                      
                                 LLC                                             

SAGAMORE HILLS,  Balanced        Financial       HCN BCC         Delaware        Summit
OHIO             Care at         Care            Holdings,                       County, Ohio
                 Sagamore        Investors of    Inc.                            
                 Hills, Inc.     Sagamore                                        
                                 Hills, LLC                                      
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2275]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


In the Matter of the Continuing Fitness of Boston-Maine Airways 
Corp.

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2008-2-3) Dockets DOT-OST-
2000-7668, DOT-OST-2003-14985, and DOT-OST-2004-19919.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding that 
Boston-Maine Airways, Corp, is not fit, willing, and able, to provide 
air transportation as a U.S. certificated air carrier.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
March 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets DOT-OST-2000-7668, DOT-OST-2003-14985, and DOT-OST-2004-19919 
and addressed to Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE., West Building, Room W12-140, 
Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in 
Attachment B to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa R. Balgobin, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 
Ave SE., West Building, Room W86-463, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-
9721.

    Dated: February 1, 2008.
Michael W. Reynolds,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
 [FR Doc. E8-2275 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 50513

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ALBERT ADAM NAVARRO, also known as Alberto Navarro, also known as Albert A. Navarro , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:12

- CR

- 188

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Albert Adam Navarro appeals his conviction following a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court ’s refusal to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of justific ation

. See United States v. Branch , 91 F.3d 699, 711 (5th Cir. 1996). In the light of the evidence adduced at trial that Navarro possessed the rifle at issue when th ere was no imminent or impending threat, that he had

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 10, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-50513 Document: 00512799567 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2014No. 13

- 50513
recklessly or negligently placed himself in the situation which he claimed necessitated possession of the rifle, and that he could have continued relying on police protection as a reasonable legal altern ative to violating the law, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the instruction. Id. ; see United States v. Posada

- Rios , 158 F.3d 832, 873 (5th Cir. 1998)

. With regard to Navarro’s arguments that two comments made by the prosecutor during closin g arguments warranted a mistrial, we apply a two

- step test on review. United States v. McCann , 613 F.3d 486, 494 (5th Cir. 2010). First, we review de novo whether the remarks were improper. See id. If e ither of the comments was improper, we review under the abuse of discretion standard whether the impropriety affected Navarro’s substantial rights such that his motion for a mistrial should have been granted. See id. Even if both comments were improper, Navarro has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in the light of both the cautionary instruction given to the jury and the evidence of Navarro’s guilt adduced at trial. See id. at 496

- 97. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-50513 Document: 00512799567 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/10/2014
#### Schirrford Realty Corp., Respondent, *v.*Reuben S. Lind, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 1, 1956.

*Reuben & Lind*for appellant.

*Joseph A. Giordano*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The decision of the court below is against the weight of the evidence. The executed agreement of a rental at less than the maximum amount fixed by order of the Rent Com*716mission, to compensate for the tenant’s obligation to furnish and service his own refrigerator, is binding on the landlord.

The final order and judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

Edeb, Heoht and Tilzeb, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS

ANETT HARP,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH

INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer filed on February 22, 2013 [Docket No. 38]. The

Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within

fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The

Recommendation was served on February 22, 2013. No party has objected to the

Recommendation. 

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge’s

recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927

F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985)

(“[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a

magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when

neither party objects to those findings”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the

Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 39 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous or contrary 1

to law” standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo

review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

2

Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.”1

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has

concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 38] is

ACCEPTED. 

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 34] is GRANTED.

3. This case is dismissed.

DATED March 18, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01972-PAB-CBS Document 39 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending October 18, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment Period2011 TCRT                                                                                                               4c8
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                                                              November 4, 1998



Mr. R. Scott Murray
Executive Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
The Learning Company, Inc.
One Athenaeum Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Dear Scott:

         Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated May 22, 1997
between The Learning Company, Inc. and you (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used and not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.

         This letter is to confirm that, effective as of October 1, 1998, the
Annual Base Salary in Section 2.1 has been changed to $500,000, and the Bonus in
Section 2.4 has been changed to $625,000.

         Please contact me if you have any questions.

                                   Sincerely,


                                   /s/ WILLIAM H. SHUPERT, III
                                   ---------------------------
                                   William H. Shupert, III
                                   Sr. Vice President, Human Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET; CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001024126
<NAME> GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,129<F4>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,823<F1>
<PP&E>                                         349,885<F6>
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,426<F1>
<BONDS>                                        224,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                     147,510<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   564<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,347)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,810)<F3>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.82)
<FN>
<F1>AS A REIT, WE DO NOT HAVE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET
<F2>INCLUDES OTHER INCOME AND INTEREST INCOME
<F3>NET INCOME AFTER MINORITY INTEREST ALLOCATION AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
<F4>INCLUDES MORTGAGE NOTE RECEIVABLE
<F5>INCLUDES MINORITY INTEREST
(F6)INCLUDES WRITEDOWN OF CERTAIN ASSETS TO ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Scherne, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Robert Scherne
                                             -------------------------
                                        Robert Scherne
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                        November 30, 2006
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Shuffle Master, Inc.; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 6, 2011              |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ MICHAEL GAVIN ISAACS |
| Michael Gavin Isaacs     |
| Chief Executive Officer  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya

Civil Action No. 11–cv–02369–PAB–KMT

LARRY SIPES,

Plaintiff,

v. 

ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, 

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Defendant’s “Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer and Counterclaim” (Doc. No. 8, filed

November 30, 2011) is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is

directed to file the “First Amended Answer, Counterclaim and Jury Demand” (Doc. No. 8-1). 

Dated: December 2, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02369-PAB-KMT Document 11 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement effective March 1, 2000



 Amendment No. 1 
  

To the Employment Agreement effective March 1, 2000 
  
 By and between 
  
 Transgenomic, Inc. 
  
 And 
  
 Collin D’Silva 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties have previously entered into an Employment Agreement
(“Agreement”) effective March 1, 2000; and 
  
 WHEREAS,
the parties now wish to provide for the extension of the term of said Agreement; 
  
 THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
  
 In
Section 1, the term of the Agreement is hereby extended for one (1) year from March 1, 2004 to February 28, 2005. 
  
 In Section 16, the addresses for notice are hereby amended as follows: 
  

			
	 To the Company:
	  	Transgenomic, Inc
	 	  	12325 Emmet Street
	 	  	Omaha, NE 68164
		
	 To the Employee
	  	Collin D’Silva
	 	  	1525 S 84th Street
	 	  	Omaha, NE 68124

  
 In all other material terms and
conditions the Agreement shall remain unaltered. 
  
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement in duplicate originals on the day and year set forth below: 
  

							
	 ON BEHALF OF TRANSGENOMIC, INC.
	  	COLLIN D’SILVA
				
	 BY:
	  	 	  	BY:	  	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

				
	 DATE:
	  	 	  	DATE:	  	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	

				
	 NAME: