In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: September 8, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SANDRA VASQUEZ, * UNPUBLISHED

*

* No. 13-129V

Petitioner, *

* Special Master Dorsey

v. *

* Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Reasonable Amount Requested to which

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent Does Not Object. 

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mark Theodore Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, NJ, for petitioner.

Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On February 20, 2013, Sandra Vasquez (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”)2 alleging that 

she received the human papillomavirus on August 17, 2010 in Upland, Pennsylvania and 

suffered shortly thereafter vaccine induced autoimmune hepatitis. On July 10, 2014, a decision

awarding compensation to petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation was entered. 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this decision on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which 

to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or 

commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes 

medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the entire decision will be available to the 

public. Id.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 

42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”). All citations in this decision to 

individual sections of the Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1

 
On September 5, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Attorneys’ Fees 

and Costs. According to the stipulation, respondent does not object to a total award of attorneys’ 

fees and costs in the amount of $24,000.00. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner

filed a statement stating that she incurred no out-of-pocket expenses in pursuing her petition. 

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 

300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and respondent’s counsel’s 

lack of objection to petitioner’s counsel’s fee request, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s

motion for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs. 

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and the law firm of Mark T. 

Sadaka, LLC in the amount of $24,000.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ 

stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2