alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2.2


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                        TO THE 1987 STOCK OPTION PLAN OF
                       SPAN-AMERICA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.


The following provision is hereby added to the 1987 Stock Option Plan of
Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. to be effective as of July 22, 1998.

      Not withstanding any other provision contained in this Plan, any presently
outstanding Option, with the consent of the holder thereof, or any Option
granted pursuant to this Plan following the date of addition of this provision
to the Plan, shall vest and become exercisable immediately prior to any change
in control of the Company. A change in control of the Company shall be deemed to
include, without limitation, each of the following:

   (i) Any  merger or consolidation to which the Company is a party in which 
       the Company is not the surviving entity or any merger or consolidation
       to which the Company is a party in which the Company is the surviving 
       entity but in which the holders of 50% or more of the beneficial 
       ownership of the Company immediately following such merger or 
       consolidation are not identical to the holders of 50% or more of the 
       beneficial ownership of the Company immediately prior to such merger or 
       consolidation;

  (ii) Any sale of 50% or more of the assets of the Company in one transaction 
       or a series of related transactions;

(iii)  Any one transaction or series of related transactions in which the
       Company delivers securities of its issue aggregating more than 50%
       of the beneficial ownership of the Company in exchange or paymentfor any 
       properties or assets of any other business entity, or securities issued 
       by any other business entity, or in a merger of any subsidiary of the 
       Company (50% or more of the ownership interests of which is held by the 
       Company) with or into any other business entity;

(iv)   Any transaction or series of related transactions in which any entity or 
       group acquires 50% or more of the beneficial ownership of the Company; or

(v)    The liquidation of the Company.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02306-WJM-KLM

LARRY D. FREDERICK,

Plaintiff,

v. 

HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SHORT BRIEFS

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Leave to file Short

Briefs in Light of Tenth Circuit Opinion, filed August 1, 2012 (ECF No. 47). The Court

having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The parties’ Joint Motion is GRANTED. Each party may file briefs addressing the

pending motion to remand in light of the Tenth Circuit’s June 28, 2012 ruling as follows:

1. Opening brief, on or before August 17, 2012

2. Response brief, on or before August 31, 2012.

No brief shall exceed six pages, exclusive of attorney signature blocks and

certificate of service.

Case 1:11-cv-02306-WJM-KLM Document 48 Filed 08/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Dated this 6th day of August, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02306-WJM-KLM Document 48 Filed 08/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAWN JONES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 786 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### John J. HURLEY, Appellant, v. Grace R. HURLEY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 24, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 20, 1954.

PER CURIAM,

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.2


December 9, 2002


Factory Card & Party Outlet Corporation
2727 Diehl Road
Naperville, Illinois 60563



We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corporation and subsidiaries for the
three month and seven month periods ended November 2, 2002, and the two month
period ended April 6, 2002; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 2, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 36-3652087 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB

CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY, 

d/b/a The Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People,

Plaintiff,

v.

REGGIE BICHA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of

Human Services, and

TERESA A. BERNAL, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of the Colorado Mental

Health Institute at Pueblo,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) A second supplemental settlement conference will be held on February 27, 2012,

at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado. All settlement conferences that take place before the magistrate judge

shall be confidential. Pro se parties, attorneys, and client representatives with full authority to

settle the case must be present at the settlement conference in person or by telephone. Anyone

planning to attend the conference by telephone must contact my chambers on or before

February 20, 2012, to make all necessary arrangements;

(2) Representatives for the defendants authorized to discuss the plaintiff’s demand

for attorneys fees must be present at the conference in person; and

(3) On or before February 6, 2012, the plaintiff shall serve on defendants’ counsel a

Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 37 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

written demand for attorneys fees, including contemporaneous time records (redacted or edited

to protect issues of privilege and trial strategy, if necessary); evidence establishing that the

hourly rate claimed is reasonable; a summary of the attorneys’ qualifications and experience; and

the total amount claimed, including a description of its basis.

Dated January 30, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 37 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
1

 “[#22]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-2364-REB-MEH

KANDACE OLSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NE COLORADO CELLULAR, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss With

Prejudice [#22]1 filed March 8, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude

that the motion should be granted and that this action should be dismissed with

prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice [#22]

filed March 8, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for September 28, 2012, is

VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence October 15, 2012, is VACATED; and

Case 1:11-cv-02364-REB-MEH Document 23 Filed 03/08/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay

their own attorney fees and costs. 

Dated March 8, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02364-REB-MEH Document 23 Filed 03/08/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 89 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 12, 2007.
Whereas, 225 years ago, on the 19th of April, 1782 in the City of the Hague, the 
        Ambassadorial credentials of John Adams were officially recognized by 
        Prince William V of Orange and the States-General, thus establishing 
        formal diplomatic ties between the new government of the United States 
        and the Republic of the Netherlands;
Whereas the historical ties between the Dutch and American people go back nearly 
        200 years earlier to the period when the Pilgrims resided for almost 11 
        years in the Netherlands before sailing to the new world;
Whereas the diplomatic ties between the governments of the United States and the 
        Netherlands are the longest continuous ties between the United States 
        and any country of the world;
Whereas the Dutch contribution to the American melting pot has played such a 
        significant role in the life of America as exemplified by Presidents 
        Martin Van Buren, Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt;
Whereas the bonds of friendship linking the Dutch and American people continue 
        to grow in strength and affection; and
Whereas the heritage of this friendship between peoples serves as a laudable 
        example for the kinds of relations that should link all the peoples of 
        the earth and should be properly extolled: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that a day 
should be established as Dutch-American Friendship Day to celebrate the historic 
ties of the United States and the Netherlands.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 72-924.

#### Lafayette Airport Commission et al. *v.*Roy et al.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MoneyLogix
Group, Inc. for the three month period ending June 30, 2009, I, Mike Knarr,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of MoneyLogix Group,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:
 
 1.   Such
Annual Quarterly on Form 10-Q for the three months ending June 30, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.   The
information contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of MoneyLogix Group,
Inc.
 
 Dated:
August 14, 2009
 
 MONEYLOGIX
      GROUP, INC.By:
                    /s/
      Mike KnarrMike
      KnarrChief
      Executive Officer,
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New generation Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Scherne, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Robert Scherne
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Robert Scherne
                                       Chief Financial Officer

                                       January 19, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy M. Francis, et al

v. Civil No. 06-cv-480-PB

Lindon L. Pulley

O R D E R

The Magistrate Judge shall hold a de novo hearing on the motion for injunctive

relief on an expedited basis and prepare a Report and Recommendation addressing

the motion. The relief previously ordered shall remain in place until further order of the

court. The motion to vacate is denied to the extant that it is inconsistent with this order. 

 

SO ORDERED.

July 12, 2007 _________________________________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: John J. LaRivee, Esq.

Michael G. Furlong, Esq.

Irvin D. Gordon, Esq.

Kevin M. O’Shea, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00480-PB Document 41 Filed 07/12/07 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-01980-LTB Document 8 Filed 09/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
skip to main navigation
skip to secondary navigation
skip to content
| What's New · 	What's Next · 	Site Map · 	A-Z Index · 	Careers · 	RSS · 	All Videos · 	Current FAQs |  | SearchAdvanced Search |  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------|--|

| About |
|-------|
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To: Integral Systems, Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated November 21, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Integral Systems, Inc. included in its Annual
Report Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the following registration statements: No. 333-102100,
No. 333-112659, No. 333-122963, No. 333-153706, No. 333-61559, No. 333-87694, No. 333-150759, and No. 333-150761.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP
|                           
|New York, New York         
|December 24, 2008
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

| (1)    | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/                William Hartman                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| William                Hartman                                                             |
| Title:                Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| Date:                November 13, 2006                                                |
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,421]


Kimble Chase Life Science & Research Products LLC, Formerly Known 
as Kimble Kontes, Vineland, NJ; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 16, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Kimble Chase, LLC, Vineland, New Jersey. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on July 14, 2008 (73 FR 40388).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of glassware for scientific use.
    New information shows the complete name of the subject firm should 
read Kimble Chase Life Science & Research Products LLC. Information 
also shows that before July 1, 2007, the subject firm was formerly 
known as Kimble Kontes. Some of the workers wages at the subject firm 
are being reported under a separate Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax 
account for Kimble Chase Life Science & Research Products LLC, formerly 
known as Kimble Kontes.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect these matters.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Kimble Chase Life Science & Research Products LLC, formerly 
known as Kimble Kontes who were adversely affected by increased imports 
following a shift in production to Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,421 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Kimble Chase Life Science & Research Products 
LLC, formerly known as Kimble Kontes, Vineland, New Jersey, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
May 19, 2007, through June 16, 2010, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-23300 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 21

A.G. EDWARDS, INC.

REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES



The following listing includes the registrants
directly owned subsidiaries and indirectly owned subsidiaries (certain subsidiaries that are not significant are omitted from the listing), all of
which are included in the consolidated financial statements:







|Name of Company                     |  |  |  | State of Incorporation/ Organization |  | Subsidiary of            
|----------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------
|A.G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc.           |  |  |  | Delaware                             |  | Registrant               
|A.G. Edwards Technology
Group, Inc. |  |  |  | Missouri                             |  | A.G. Edwards
& Sons, Inc.
|A.G. Edwards Hedging
Services, Inc. |  |  |  | Nevada                               |  | Registrant               
|A.G. Edwards Trust Company
FSB      |  |  |  | Federal
Charter                      |  | Registrant               
|A.G.E. Properties,
Inc.             |  |  |  | Missouri                             |  | Registrant               
|AGE Investments,
Inc.               |  |  |  | Delaware                             |  | Registrant               
|Beaumont Insurance
Company          |  |  |  | Vermont                              |  | AGE Investments,
Inc.    
|A.G. Edwards Capital,
Inc.          |  |  |  | Delaware                             |  | Registrant               
|AGE Capital Holding,
Inc.           |  |  |  | Delaware                             |  | Registrant               
|AGE International,
Inc.             |  |  |  | Delaware                             |  | Registrant               
|A.G. Edwards & Sons
(UK) Limited    |  |  |  | United
Kingdom                       |  | AGE
International, Inc.  

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOMINIQUE MORCE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-827

[October 20, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312018CF000784A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Dominique Morce, Orlando, appellant.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

VAL JOHNSON,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-10201

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00077-JCM-RJJ-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 11, 2012

San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

The United States appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court

order denying forfeiture. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate

the district court’s sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with

United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2011).

FILED

OCT 05 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Under Newman, the district court had no discretion to reduce or eliminate

forfeiture. Id. at 1240. However, if the district court determines there is reason to

question the accuracy of the stipulated forfeiture amount, it should take evidence of

the amount of the proceeds. See id. at 1245-46.

Though decided after the district court entered its sentence, Newman did not

announce a new constitutional rule of criminal procedure, and therefore is not

barred from retroactive application under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989).

See Reina-Rodriguez v. United States, 655 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir. 2011).

Johnson waived any Eighth Amendment challenge to his forfeiture amount

in his plea memorandum. See United States v. Joyce, 357 F.3d 921, 922 (9th Cir.

2004).

Sentence VACATED and action REMANDED.