57564 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules 

Parent company. For purposes of 

License Exception ICT only (see 

§ 740.19 of the EAR), ‘‘parent company’’ 

means any entity that wholly-owns or 

controls in fact a different entity, such 

as a subsidiary or branch. The parent 

company may be incorporated in and 

conduct its principal place of business 

inside the United States or outside of 

the United States, but certain location 

restrictions apply (see § 740.19(b)(1) and 

Supplement No. 4 to part 740). The 

parent company itself may also have an 

ultimate parent company, meaning the 

parent company is wholly-owned or 

controlled in fact by another entity or 

other entities. See also the definition of 

‘‘controlled in fact’’ in this section for 

further information. 

* * * * * 

Dated: September 29, 2008. 

Christopher R. Wall, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–23506 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

43 CFR Part 8360 

[WO–250–1220–PM–24 1A] 

RIN 1004–AD96 

Visitor Services 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) proposes to amend 

its regulations to remove the Land and 

Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCFA) 

as one of the authorities of our 

Recreation regulations, in accordance 

with the Federal Lands Recreation 

Enhancement Act of 2004 (REA). The 

rule will also amend and reorder the 

prohibitions to separate those that apply 

specifically to campgrounds and picnic 

areas from those with more general 

applications. The reordering is 

necessary to broaden the scope to 

include all areas where standard 

amenity, expanded amenity, and special 

recreation permit fees are charged under 

REA. The proposed rule would remove 

an unnecessary provision that has been 

interpreted to require the BLM to 

publish supplementary rules concerning 

failure to pay fees established by the 

recreation regulations, thus relieving the 

BLM from publishing such separate 

specific supplementary rules for each 

area. Finally, it will make technical 

changes to maintain consistency with 

other BLM regulations. 

DATES: We will accept comments and 

suggestions on the proposed rule until 

December 2, 2008. The BLM will not 

necessarily consider any comments 

received after the above date in making 

its decision on the final rule. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods listed 

below: 

Mail: U.S. Department of the Interior, 

Director (630), Bureau of Land 

Management, Mail Stop 401 LS, 1849 C 

St., NW., Attention: [RIN: 1004–AD96] 

Washington, DC 20240. 

Personal or messenger delivery: 1620 

L Street, NW., Room 401, Washington, 

DC 20036. 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information on the substance of the 

proposed rule, please contact Hal 

Hallett at (202) 452–7794 or Anthony 

Bobo Jr. at (202) 452–0333. For 

information on procedural matters, 

please contact Chandra Little at (202) 

452–5030. Persons who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

to contact the above individuals during 

normal business hours. FIRS is available 

twenty-four hours a day, seven days a 

week, to leave a message or question 

with the above individuals. You will 

receive a reply during normal business 

hours. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Public Comment Procedures 

II. Background 

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

IV. Procedural Matters 

I. Public Comment Procedures 

Electronic Access and Filing Address 

You may view an electronic version of 

this proposed rule at the BLM’s Internet 

home page at www.blm.gov or at 

http://www.regulations.gov. You may 

comment via the Internet to: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. If you submit your 

comments electronically, please include 

your name and return address in your 

Internet message. 

Written Comments 

Confine written comments on the 

proposed rule to issues pertinent to the 

proposed rule and explain the reason for 

any recommended changes. Where 

possible, reference the specific section 

or paragraph of the proposal which you 

are addressing. The BLM need not 

consider or include in the 

Administrative Record for the final rule 

comments which it receives after the 

comment period close (see DATES), or 

comments delivered to an address other 

than those listed above (see ADDRESSES). 

Before including your address, phone 

number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment, including your 

personal identifying information, may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Reviewing Comments Submitted by 

Others 

Comments, including the names and 

street addresses, and other contact 

information, will be available for public 

review at the address listed under 

ADDRESSES during regular business 

hours (7:45 am to 4:15 pm), Monday 

through Friday, except holidays. 

II. Background 

The passage of the REA, 16 U.S.C. 

6801 et seq., required the BLM to 

change its fee management regulations, 

policies, and procedures to bring them 

into compliance with this law. The BLM 

has already accomplished this by 

including in part 2930 all recreation fee 

management regulations including the 

requirement that visitors pay fees before 

occupying a campground or picnic area. 

The BLM is now amending part 8360 to 

complete the regulatory changes made 

necessary by the law, including removal 

of any language pertaining to recreation 

fees. In addition, the section dealing 

with the collection of fossils was 

modified to include common plant 

fossils, reflecting long established BLM 

policies. Other changes were made to 

group related regulations in the same 

section to simplify language and clarify 

the intent, and to resolve 

inconsistencies between existing 

provisions. 

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

Section 8360.0–3 Authority 

The proposed rule removes the Land 

and Water Conservation Fund Act 

(LWCFA) (16 U.S.C. 460l–6a) as an 

authority for the regulations. The 

enactment of the REA changed the 

BLM’s authority to collect recreation 

fees. Recreation fees that were 

previously authorized under the 

LWCFA are now included under REA. 

The BLM’s policies and procedures 

have also been revised to reflect this 

new and revised authority. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules 57565 

Section 8360.0–5 Definitions 

In paragraph (c), the proposed rule 

adds the word ‘‘recreation’’ as a 

modifier to developed sites and areas in 

order to clarify that the definition is 

specific to developed recreation sites 

and areas. The same language is inserted 

elsewhere in this subpart to distinguish 

developed recreation sites and areas 

from other developed sites and areas 

used for non-recreation purposes. 

Section 8365.1–5 Property and 

Resources 

In paragraph (b)(2), the proposed rule 

adds plant fossils to the list of resources 

that recreational visitors may collect for 

non-commercial purposes. This change 

will correct an oversight in this 

provision and clarify what has been a 

long-standing policy of the BLM to 

allow recreational collecting of common 

invertebrate and plant fossils, not just 

common invertebrate fossils. This 

policy was previously incorporated into 

BLM Handbook H–8270–1, ‘‘General 

Procedural Guidance for Paleontological 

Resources Management,’’ which 

provides that, subject to the provisions 

of 43 CFR subpart 8365, and unless 

otherwise prohibited by land use plans 

or other authorities, invertebrate and 

plant fossils may be collected in 

reasonable amounts for non-commercial 

purposes without a permit. 

Also in paragraph (b)(2), the proposed 

rule removes rocks from the list because 

rocks are already included in and 

covered by ‘‘mineral materials’’ in 

paragraph (b)(4) of the same section. 

Otherwise, paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(4) 

would remain in conflict concerning 

whether rocks can be collected by 

recreational visitors. This conflict has 

created problems in the past in the 

management of mineral materials. 

Section 8365.2–3 Occupancy and Use 

The provisions in this section have 

been reordered to separate those that 

apply specifically to campgrounds and 

picnic areas from those that apply to all 

developed recreation sites and areas, 

including campgrounds and picnic 

areas. The restructuring was in response 

to a need to include all areas where 

standard amenity, expanded amenity, 

and special recreation fees are 

authorized under the REA. This also 

brings this section into conformance 

with part 2930, which was previously 

rewritten in response to the REA. 

The proposed rule also amends this 

section by removing as a prohibited act 

failure to pay fees. This prohibition is 

already included in 43 CFR 2933.33, so 

it is unnecessary in these regulations. If 

the proposed rule is adopted, it will also 

no longer be necessary to include fee 

requirements in supplementary rules 

issued under section 8365.1–6. 

IV. Procedural Matters 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

These proposed regulations are not a 

significant regulatory action and are not 

subject to review by Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866. 

(1) These proposed regulations will 

not have an effect of $100 million or 

more on the economy. They will not 

adversely affect in a material way the 

economy, productivity, competition, 

jobs, the environment, public health or 

safety, or state, local, or tribal 

governments or communities. 

(2) These proposed regulations will 

not create a serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency. 

(3) These proposed regulations do not 

alter the budgetary effects of 

entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan 

programs or the right or obligations of 

their recipients. 

(4) These proposed regulations do not 

raise novel legal or policy issues. The 

BLM policies and procedures have 

merely been amended to reflect new 

statutory authority, and to remove 

inconsistencies in language. 

Clarity of the Regulations 

Executive Order 12866 requires each 

agency to write regulations that are 

simple and easy to understand. We 

invite your comments on how to make 

these proposed regulations easier to 

understand, including answers to 

questions such as the following: 

1. Are the requirements in the 

proposed regulations clearly stated? 

2. Do the proposed regulations 

contain technical language or jargon that 

interferes with their clarity? 

3. Does the format of the proposed 

regulations (grouping and order of 

sections, use of headings, paragraphing, 

etc.) aid or reduce their clarity? 

4. Would the regulations be easier to 

understand if they were divided into 

more (but shorter) sections? (A 

‘‘section’’ appears in bold type and is 

preceded by the symbol ‘‘§’’ and a 

numbered heading, for example: 

§ 8360.0–5 Definitions. 

5. Is the description of the proposed 

regulations in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section of this preamble 

helpful in understanding the proposed 

regulations? How could this description 

be more helpful in making the proposed 

regulations easier to understand? 

Please send any comments you have 

on the clarity of the regulations to the 

address specified in the ADDRESSES

section. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) 

The BLM has determined that this 

proposed rule merely amends the 

statutory authority of our Recreation 

regulations from the LWCF to the REA. 

This proposed rule would bring our 

recreation regulations into compliance 

with the REA. The proposed rule 

amends and reorders the prohibitions to 

separate those that apply specifically to 

campgrounds and picnic areas from 

those with more general application, but 

does not change their effect. It makes it 

clear that common plant fossils are 

available to recreational collectors 

without changing policy in that regard, 

and resolves minor inconsistencies 

between provisions. Therefore, it is 

categorically excluded from 

environmental review under Section 

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act, pursuant to 516 

Departmental Manual (DM), Chapter 2, 

Appendix 1. In addition, the proposed 

rule does not meet any of the 10 criteria 

for exceptions to categorical exclusions 

listed in 516 DM, Chapter 2, Appendix 

2. Pursuant to Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations (40 

CFR 1508.4) and the environmental 

policies and procedures of the 

Department of the Interior, the term 

‘‘categorical exclusions’’ means a 

category of actions which do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment and that have been found 

to have no such effect in procedures 

adopted by a Federal agency and for 

which neither an environmental 

assessment nor an environmental 

impact statement is required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Congress enacted the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, as 

amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure 

that Government regulations do not 

unnecessarily or disproportionately 

burden small entities. The RFA requires 

a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule 

would have a significant economic 

impact, either detrimental or beneficial, 

on a substantial number of small 

entities. The proposed rule pertains to 

individuals and families recreating on 

the public lands and not to small 

businesses or other small entities. 

Therefore, the BLM has determined 

under the RFA that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
57566 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act (SBREFA) 

This proposed rule is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act. That is, it would not have 

an annual effect on the economy of $100 

million or more; it would not result in 

major cost or price increases for 

consumers, industries, government 

agencies, or regions; and it would not 

have significant adverse effects on 

competition, employment, investment, 

productivity, innovation, or the ability 

of U.S.-based enterprises to compete 

with foreign-based enterprises. The 

proposed rule merely amends the 

regulations to change the statutory 

authority of the BLM’s Recreation 

regulations from the LWCF to the REA, 

to make technical changes to bring our 

recreation regulations into compliance 

with the REA, and to make them 

internally consistent. The rule will also 

amend and reorder the prohibitions to 

separate those that apply specifically to 

campgrounds and picnic areas from 

those with more general application. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This proposed rule would not impose 

an unfunded mandate on state, local, or 

Tribal governments or the private sector, 

in the aggregate, of $100 million or more 

per year; nor does this proposed rule 

have a significant or unique effect on 

state, local, or Tribal governments. The 

rule would impose no requirements on 

any of these entities. We have already 

shown, in the previous paragraphs of 

this section of the preamble, that the 

change proposed in this rule would not 

have effects approaching $100 million 

per year on the private sector. Therefore, 

the BLM is not required to prepare a 

statement containing the information 

required by the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference With 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights (Takings) 

This proposed rule is not a 

government action capable of interfering 

with constitutionally protected property 

rights. It merely updates the regulations 

to reflect changes in authority for the 

BLM recreation program covered by the 

regulations, and makes editorial changes 

as discussed in this preamble. 

Therefore, the Department of the 

Interior has determined that the rule 

would not cause a taking of private 

property or require further discussion of 

takings implications under this 

Executive Order. 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism 

This proposed rule will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the states, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

government and the states, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the levels of 

government. It would not apply to states 

or local governments or state or local 

governmental entities. Therefore, in 

accordance with Executive Order 13132, 

the BLM has determined that this 

proposed rule does not have sufficient 

federalism implications to warrant 

preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform 

Under Executive Order 12988, we 

have determined that this proposed rule 

would not unduly burden the judicial 

system and that it meets the 

requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 

of the Order. 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13175, we have found that this rule does 

not include policies that have tribal 

implications. This rule has no effect on 

Tribal lands, and it affects members of 

Tribes only to the extent that they use 

public lands and facilities for recreation. 

This rule will bring our recreation 

regulations into compliance with the 

REA. 

Information Quality Act 

In developing this proposed rule, the 

BLM did not conduct or use a study, 

experiment, or survey requiring peer 

review under the Information Quality 

Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106–554). 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13211, the BLM has determined that 

this proposed rule will not have 

substantial direct effects on energy 

supply, distribution, or use, including a 

shortfall in supply or price increase. 

The rule has no bearing on energy 

development, but merely changes the 

authority provisions for and rearranges 

certain prohibited act provisions for 

recreational visitors on the public lands. 

This rule should have no effect on the 

volume of visitation or on consumption 

of energy supplies. 

Executive Order 13352—Facilitation of 

Cooperative Conservation 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13352, the BLM has determined that 

this proposed rule is administrative in 

nature and only reflects changes in 

authority, and reorganizes and clarifies 

certain provisions. It does not impede 

facilitating cooperative conservation. It 

does not affect the interests of persons 

with ownership or other legally 

recognized interests in land or other 

natural resources, properly 

accommodate local participation in the 

Federal decision-making process, or 

relate to the protection of public health 

and safety. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

These regulations do not contain 

information collection requirements that 

the Office of Management and Budget 

must approve under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq. 

Authors 

The principal authors of this rule are 

Hal Hallet and Anthony Bobo of the 

Recreation and Visitor Services 

Division, Washington Office, BLM 

assisted by Chandra Little and Ted 

Hudson of the Regulatory Affairs Group, 

Washington Office, BLM. 

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 8360 

Penalties, Public lands, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, and 

Wilderness areas. 

Dated: September 18, 2008. 

C. Stephen Allred, 

Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Land and 

Minerals Management. 

For the reasons explained in the 

preamble, and under the authority of 43 

U.S.C. 1740, we propose to amend 

chapter II, subtitle B of title 43 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations as follows: 

PART 8360—VISITOR SERVICES 

1. The authority citation for part 8360 

is revised to read as follows: 

Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., 43 U.S.C. 

315a, 16 U.S.C. 1281c, 16 U.S.C. 670 et seq., 

16 U.S.C. 1241 et seq. 

Subpart 8360—General 

2. Revise § 8360.0–3 to read as 

follows: 

§ 8360.0–3 Authority. 

The regulations of this part are issued 

under the provisions of the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the Sikes 

Act (16 U.S.C. 670g), the Taylor Grazing 

Act (43 U.S.C. 315a), the Wild and 

Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1281c), the 

Act of September 18, 1960, as amended, 

(16 U.S.C. 877 et seq.), and the National 

Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1241 et 

seq.). 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules 57567 

3. Amend § 8360.0–5 by revising 

paragraph (c) to read as follows: 

§ 8360.0–5 Definitions. 

* * * * * 

(c) Developed recreation sites and 

areas mean sites and areas that contain 

structures or capital improvements 

primarily used by the public for 

recreation purposes. Such sites or areas 

may include such features as: 

Delineated spaces for parking, camping 

or boat launching; sanitary facilities; 

potable water; grills or fire rings; tables; 

or controlled access. 

* * * * * 

4. Revise § 8365.1–5(b)(2) to read as 

follows: 

§ 8365.1–5 Property and resources. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) Nonrenewable resources such as 

mineral specimens, common 

invertebrate and plant fossils, and 

semiprecious gemstones; 

* * * * * 

5. Revise § 8365.2–3 to read as 

follows: 

§ 8365.2–3 Occupancy and use. 

In developed camping and picnicking 

areas, no person shall, unless otherwise 

authorized: 

(a) Pitch any tent, park any trailer, 

erect any shelter or place any other 

camping equipment in any area other 

than the place designed for it within a 

designated campsite; 

(b) Leave personal property 

unattended for more than 24 hours in a 

day use area, or 72 hours in other areas. 

Personal property left unattended 

beyond such time limit is subject to 

disposition under the Federal Property 

and Administration Services Act of 

1949, as amended (40 U.S.C. 484(m)); 

(c) Build any fire except in a stove, 

grill, fireplace or ring provided for such 

purpose; 

(d) Enter or remain in campgrounds 

closed during established night periods 

except as an occupant or while visiting 

persons occupying the campgrounds for 

camping purposes; 

(e) Occupy a site with more people 

than permitted within the developed 

campsite; or 

(f) Move any table, stove, barrier, litter 

receptacle or other campground 

equipment. 

[FR Doc. E8–23258 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–84–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Telecommunications and 

Information Administration 

47 CFR Part 400 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0142] 

RIN 2127–AK37 

E–911 Grant Program 

AGENCIES: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT); 

National Telecommunications and 

Information Administration (NTIA), 

Department of Commerce (DOC). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This joint notice proposes 

implementing regulations for the E–911 

Grant Program authorized under the 

Ensuring Needed Help Arrives Near 

Callers Employing 911 (ENHANCE 911) 

Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–494, codified 

at 47 U.S.C. 942). The Act authorizes 

grants for the implementation and 

operation of Phase II enhanced 911 

services and for migration to an IPenabled emergency network. This 

NPRM proposes the application, award 

and administrative requirements for the 

E–911 grant program and seeks 

comments thereon. 

DATES: Written comments may be 

submitted to this agency and must be 

received by December 2, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by DOT Docket ID Number 

NHTSA–2008–0142 by any of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://wwww.regulations.gov. Follow 

the online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building, Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West 

Building, Ground Floor, Room W12– 

140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Instructions: For detailed instructions 

on submitting comments and additional 

information on the rulemaking process, 

see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading 

in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section of this document. Note that all 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. Please 

see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading below. 

Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search 

the electronic form of all comments 

received into any of our dockets by the 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or signing the comment, if 

submitted on behalf of an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). You may 

review DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19476–78). 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov at any time or to 

West Building, Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

program issues: Mr. Drew Dawson, 

Director, Office of Emergency Medical 

Services, National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., NTI–140, Washington, DC 

20590. Telephone: (202) 366–9966. 

E-mail: Drew.Dawson@dot.gov. 

For legal issues: Ms. Jin Kim, 

Attorney-Advisor, Office of the Chief 

Counsel, National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., NCC–113, Washington, DC 

20590. Telephone: (202) 366–1834. 

E-mail: Jin.Kim@dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Summary of the ENHANCE 911 Act 

III. Proposed Regulations 

A. Definitions 

B. Who May Apply 

C. Application Requirements 

1. State 911 Plan 

2. Project Budget 

3. Supplemental Project Budget 

4. Designated E–911 Coordinator 

5. Certifications 

6. Due Date 

D. Approval and Award 

E. Distribution of Grant Funds 

F. Eligible Uses for Grant Funds 

G. Non-Compliance 

H. Financial and Administrative 

Requirements 

I. Closeout 

IV. Public Participation 

V. Statutory Basis for This Action 

VI. Regulatory Analyses and Notices 

A. Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures 

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

C. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) 

D. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice 

Reform) 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS