alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Camin Cargo Control, Inc., 31 Fulton Street—Unit A, New Haven, CT 06513, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on December 14, 2005. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for December 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-1060. 

      ( print page 7572)    
Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E8-2297 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
First Amendment to Employee Agreement -- Lori Jones



 EXHIBIT 10.31 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 (Chief Financial Officer) 
  
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of November 26, 2003, by and
between Analytical Surveys, Inc., a Colorado corporation whose principal executive offices are located in San Antonio, Texas (“Employer”), and Lori A. Jones (“Officer”). 
  
 Recitals 
  
 A. Employer and Officer are parties to an Employment Agreement dated as of January 20, 2003 (the “Employment
Agreement”). 
  
 B. Employer and Officer desire to make
certain amendments to the Employment Agreement. 
  
 Agreement

  
 Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Bonuses. Employer will pay a bonus of $60,000 (the “Bonus”) to Officer within 30 days of the filing of the September 30, 2004, audited financial statements with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ; provided, however, that the Bonus shall not be earned or due to Officer unless Officer is employed by Employer on the date such bonus is to be paid and Officer is performing at a satisfactory level
as determined by the Employer in its sole discretion. This Bonus will be paid on a lump sum, cash basis. This Bonus replaces any other bonus provisions for Officer, and specifically the bonus provisions outlined in the Employment Agreement. Officer
expressly waives and releases any and all rights to bonus compensation under the terms of the Employment Agreement. 

  

	 	2.	Miscellaneous. Except as modified by this Amendment, all provisions of the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect. This Amendment and the Employment
Agreement constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to Officer’s employment and supersede all proposals, prior agreements and all other communications between the parties, whether oral or in writing, relating to the
subject matter of this Amendment and the Employment Agreement. This Amendment may be amended or superseded only by an agreement in writing, signed by the Officer and an executive officer of Employer. This Amendment will be governed by and construed
according to the internal laws of the State of Texas, without regard to conflict of law principles. Disputes arising out of this Amendment or the Employment Agreement will be resolved in the manner provided for in Section 19 of the Employment
Agreement. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

					
	Employer:	 	 	 	Analytical Surveys, Inc.
			
	 	 	 	 	 By:


	 	 	 	 	Print Name: J. Norman Rokosh
	 	 	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
			
	Officer:	 	 	 	  


	 	 	 	 	Lori A. Jones

  

 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133013-4 & (62) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

MORRIS PUMPS, a division of YEOMANS Marilyn Kelly 

CHICAGO CORPORATION, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff-Appellee, Stephen J. Markman, v SC: 133013 Justices COA: 268717 
 Wayne CC: 04-422970-CK

CENTERLINE PIPING, INC.,

Defendant,
 and 

EBI-DETROIT, INC., a/k/a EBI DETROIT, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

R. VANDER LIND & SON, INC., and 

CHEMINEER, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

and 

ROBBINS & MEYERS, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 133014 

 COA: 268718 
 Wayne CC: 04-435014-CK 

CENTERLINE PIPING, INC., 

Defendant,
 

and 

EBI-DETROIT, INC., a/k/a EBI DETROIT, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2006 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2007 

 Clerk
Second, Tarragano argues that his sentence of 28-72 months'

imprisonment constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We disagree. The statute fixing Tarragano's punishment is not unconstitutional, his sentence is within statutory limits, see NRS 202.360(1)(a), and his term of incarceration is not "so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience" when considering the nature and circumstances of his crime and his criminal history. See Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting CuIverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion).

Having considered Tarragano's contentions and concluded that they lack merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

Parraguirre k sut Cherry

cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge Harry R. Gensler Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 73M0

7 ' 2 J.

J.

J.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Mark
Smith, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GULF ONSHORE, INC.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and


c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
August 14, 2008





/s/ Mark
Smith





Mark
Smith


Chief
Financial Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- Raytheon Company Intelligence,

Information and Services Under Contract No. NNG1 OXA03C APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59459, 59460, 59461

Karen L. Manos, Esq. Sarah B. Gleich, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Chantilly, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 13 January 2015

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 59459, 59460, 59461, Appeals of Raytheon Company Intelligence, Information and Services, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                                 TBC CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    State of Incorporation /
Name of Subsidiary                                        Organization
------------------                                  -----------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
Big O Tires, Inc.                                            Nevada

Big O Tire of Idaho, Inc.                                    Idaho

Carroll's, Inc.                                              Georgia

TBC Brands, LLC                                              Delaware

TBC Capital, LLC                                             Delaware

TBC International Inc.                                       Delaware

TBC Retail Enterprises, Inc.                                 Delaware

Tire Kingdom, Inc.                                           Florida
</TABLE>



Certain other subsidiaries have not been listed because they would not, if
considered in the aggregate as one subsidiary, constitute a "significant
subsidiary," as defined in Rule 1.02(w) of Regulation S-X.


                                      -215-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven Roy, Charles Wolff,

Eric Chaplin, Joel Smith,

John Gosselin, Bruce Usher,

William Johnson, Prayer Feather

Farrow

v. Civil No. 09-cv-75-SM

NH Department of Corrections,

Commmissioner; NH State Prison,

Warden; Northern NH Correctional

Facility, Warden; Robert MacLeod,

Karen Anderson

O R D E R

Defendants seek my recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). I

reject the suggestion that sending a file for review by one of

the few attorneys in the state willing to consider taking a

prisoner case somehow places my neutrality or objectivity into

question. The prisoner filed a motion to appoint counsel. The

prisoner’s claims had merit and counsel was free to do his own

analysis. 

Judge Arenas did the preliminary review in this case, so I

was not familiar with the complaint in this case until the

motion. Having now read the complaint, I find that it has some

Case 1:09-cv-00075-SM Document 27 Filed 04/10/09 Page 1 of 2
2

issues identical to factual issues in Mr. Roy’s “dental case.” 

In that case, I made factual findings concerning defendants’

unconstitutional lack of adequate dental care. My findings were

in part based upon defendants’ own witnesses. The question isn’t

whether I could be objective because I certainly can be

objective. However, I do think that having made those findings,

my objectivity may reasonably be questioned. I recuse myself

from all further proceedings in this case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 10, 2009

cc: David P. Slawksy, Esq.

 Lawrence A. Vogelman, Esq.

 Danielle Leah, Esq.

 Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

 Anne M. Edwards, Esq.

Case 1:09-cv-00075-SM Document 27 Filed 04/10/09 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use in the Registration Statements and Prospectus on Form S-8
dated December 30, 1994, of Shuffle Master, Inc. of our report dated December
13, 1995, on the financial statements of Shuffle Master, Inc. for the year ended
October 31, 1995, incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements, and
to the use of our name and the statements with respect to us under the heading
"Experts" in such Prospectus.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 22, 1998                        BLANSKI PETER KRONLAGE & ZOCH, P.A.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of World Heart Corporation(the “Corporation”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Richard Juelis, Vice President, Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 thatto my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Corporation as of June 30, 2006.
| Dated: August 11, 2006 |   | /s/ *A. Richard Juelis                                                                                                  |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | A. Richard Juelis, Vice President, Finance   and Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----

*******                   **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided tothe Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            362
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,842
<PP&E>                                          1,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (270)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,876
<BONDS>                                        14,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           2,295                
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           70
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,570
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               17,844
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS**








I,
      Richard E. Gathright, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Streicher Mobile Fueling,
      Inc.;





2. Based
      on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact
      or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
      light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with
      respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4. The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed
      such
      disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
      the
      effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
      in
      this report any change in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
      significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b) Any
      fraud,
      whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
      a
      significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.







Date:
      November 14, 2006








/s/
      Richard E. Gathright


Richard
      E. Gathright


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


-33-