alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 40-F**

|   |   | **REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934 **                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **OR **
X 
**ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 
For the fiscal year ended: **  December 31, 2009**
Commission File Number: **  1-8481** 
**BCE INC.***(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)*

**Canada***(Province or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)*

**4813***(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number (if applicable))*

**98-0134477***(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number (if applicable))*

**1, carrefour Alexander-Graham-Bell, Building A, 8th Floor, Verdun, Québec, Canada H3E 3B3, (514) 870-8777***(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)*

**CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10011, (212) 894-8940***(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United States)*

Copies of all correspondence should be sent to: 
Ildo Ricciuto |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending March 20, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6636

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARL BLAISE, a/k/a Carl Malaskiewicz, a/k/a

John Doe, a/k/a Carl Coydic, a/k/a Carl Blais,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CR-00-218-A, CA-02-1808-AM)

Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 17, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Blaise, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Michael Kennedy, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Blaise seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

and motion to reconsider. The orders are not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, ,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039-40 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Blaise has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Letterhead of Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc.]

                                                       January 15, 1998

Mr. Thomas Cohen
1290 Avenue of the Americas
2nd Floor
New York, N.Y. 10104

            Re:   Consulting Services

Dear Tom:

            The purpose of this letter is to set forth our agreement for the
calendar year 1998 with respect to having you provide consulting services to
Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company").

            You have agreed that you will provide the Company with consulting
services as reasonably requested by the Company in connection with matters
beyond your responsibilities as an outside director. Matters covered by your
consulting services hereunder shall principally involve assistance in the
preparation and review of press releases, assistance and advice with respect to
presentations made by the Company in its Federal Securities law filings and
other matters such as attention to certain day to day business questions as to
which you have rendered advice in the past.

            For your consulting services you shall be paid quarterly in arrears
at the rate of $1,000 per month no later than the fifteenth day of the month
following the end of each quarter. Services which the Company requests you to
provide on acquisitions and other significant transactions are not covered by
this Agreement and will be subject to separate agreed upon compensation.

            This agreement may be terminated by either the Company or you on
three months prior written notice. Except as terminated by either party, this
Agreement shall continue for a two year period. Will you please indicate your
acceptance of the terms of this agreement by signing and returning a copy of
this letter in the space indicated below.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc.


                                           /s/ John Loeffler, President
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       By: John Loeffler, President

Accepted and Agreed


/s/ Thomas Cohen
------------------------------
Thomas Cohen
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shakee Walley, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 283]

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered March 23, 2001, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of promoting prison contraband in the first degree and assault in the second degree.

Defendant’s convictions arise out of a February 11, 2000 occurrence at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County in which defendant repeatedly stabbed a fellow inmate about the head with a 6V4-inch sharpened Plexiglas shank. On appeal, defendant contends only that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to support the “physical injury” element of the crime of assault in the second degree *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; § 120.05 [7]) and that there was insufficient evidence that he was in possession of “dangerous contraband,” an element of the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). We disagree and accordingly affirm.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Harper,*75 NY2d 313, 316-317), we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found that the element of “physical injury” was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Notably, Fisher Nesmith, the facility physician’s assistant who treated the victim, testified that the victim sustained two puncture wounds and eight lacerations to the head, requiring 14 sutures to close. According to Nesmith, the wounds were “potentially dangerous” due to the vascular nature of the affected area and “would be painful injuries.” Under the circumstances, we agree with the People that the wounds inflicted upon the victim were not mere “petty slaps” but were of a type that a jury could reasonably conclude would result in substantial pain *(see,*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *People v Colantonio,*277 AD2d 498, 500-501, *lv denied*96 NY2d 781; *People v Fallen,*
      *718194 AD2d 928, *lv denied*82 NY2d 753; *People v Pope,*174 AD2d 319, 321, *lv denied*78 NY2d 1079; *People v Ruttenbur,*112 AD2d 13; *People v Chesebro,*94 AD2d 897). Further, the eyewitness testimony of correction officer Michael Hathaway that he observed defendant with a Plexiglas weapon in his right hand during the incident, that he later observed defendant drop the weapon to the floor, and that following the incident he retrieved the bloody weapon, which he identified as the same one that was received in evidence at trial, competently established defendant’s possession of dangerous contraband *(see, People v Denny,*199 AD2d 686, 687, *lv denied*83 NY2d 804).

Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Financial Data Schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Company's balance sheet and statement of income and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  458,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,447
<INVENTORY>                                     42,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               525,815
<PP&E>                                       1,705,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 370,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,466,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,678
<BONDS>                                      1,229,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           583
<OTHER-SE>                                     639,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,466,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,147,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,772,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               141,833
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             107,243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                135,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,871
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending June 6, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 86 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 24, 2007.
    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 78) amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 
permit Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to the Congress to cast votes in 
the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. The resolution shall 
be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the resolution and on any amendment thereto to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) one hour 
of debate on the resolution equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; (2) the amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 
Representative Kirk of Illinois or his designee, which shall be in order without 
intervention of any point of order or demand for division of the question, shall 
be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for 20 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to 
recommit which may not contain instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H. Res. 78 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      3,676,327
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,667,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            7,663,590
<PP&E>                                      1,619,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                493,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,726,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,917,236
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       63,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,745,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9,726,594
<SALES>                                     3,638,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,638,636
<CGS>                                       2,335,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,335,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,509,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (196,382)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (196,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (196,382)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)



</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 92 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to clarify and make 

corrections to the House ban on air travel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2007 

Mr. ISSA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

clarify and make corrections to the House ban on air travel. 

1 Resolved, That clause 15(a) of rule XXIII of the 

2 Rules of the House of Representatives is amended to read 

3 as follows: 

4 ‘‘15. (a) A Member, Delegate or Resident Commis5 sioner may not use personal funds, official funds, or cam6 paign funds for a flight on a nongovernmental plane that 

7 is owned or operated by a registered lobbyist or agent of 

8 a foreign principal or from a private entity that retains 

9 or employs registered lobbyists or agents of a foreign prin10 cipal except for the following: 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 92 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) Flights on regularly scheduled air carriers. 

2 ‘‘(2) Flights at the public rate on chartered air3 craft where seats are generally available to the pub4 lic. 

5 ‘‘(3) Flights on aircraft used in support of offi6 cial duties approved in advance by the Committee on 

7 Standards of Official Conduct.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00361-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. THOMAS DANIEL SANCHEZ,

Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING COMPETENCY 

This matter initially came before me on the Motion to Determine Competency of

Defendant Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241, filed January 31, 2012 [ECF No. 27], by

counsel for Defendant Thomas Sanchez. By Order dated February 9, 2012 [ECF No.

28], I granted the motion and concluded that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a),

“reasonable cause exists to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from

a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is

unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or

to assist properly in his defense.” I then ordered that Defendant be committed to the

custody of the Attorney General for a psychiatric or psychological evaluation by a

licensed certified psychiatrist or psychologist designated and provided by the Bureau of

Prisons. That evaluation took place at the Federal Detention Center in Seattle,

Washington, and a report was submitted to the Court and counsel for the parties on

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 41 Filed 06/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

May 10, 2012. 

The report concludes that “[f]rom the available information, there is no evidence

to indicate that Mr. Sanchez currently suffers from a mental disorder that would

substantially impair his present ability to understand the nature and consequences of

the court proceedings brought against him, or impair his ability to assist counsel in his

defense.” At a status conference on May 31, 2012, counsel for the parties indicated

that they accept the conclusions contained in the report and have no objection to a

finding by the Court that Defendant is competent to proceed in this matter based on the

report. In addition, counsel for Defendant stated that a hearing to determine

competency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a) need not be conducted. 

Therefore, I hereby accept the conclusions contained in report the find that

Defendant is mentally competent to proceed in this matter within the meaning of 18

U.S.C. § 4241. 

 Dated: June 4, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:11-cr-00361-WYD Document 41 Filed 06/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the accompanying report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I, John D.
Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            To
      my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
February 28, 2008








/s/ John D. Thomas


John D.
Thomas
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Richard C. White

Richard C. White, Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2004