alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-66]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-66 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: September 25, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 61024)          ( print page 61025)          ( print page 61026)          ( print page 61027)          ( print page 61028)          ( print page 61029)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-23350 Filed 10-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-355-MSK-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART,

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants.

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT

The United States of America, by and through United States Attorney John F. Walsh

and Assistant United States Attorneys Linda Kaufman and Martha Paluch, respectfully

moves to restrict Government’s Sentencing Statement and Response to Defendant John

Phillip Gallegos’ Sentencing Statement and Motion for Non-Guideline Statutory Sentence,

any order revealing the contents of that document, and the brief filed in support of this

motion, for the reasons stated in the brief filed in support of this motion. The United States

requests a “Level 2" Restriction which would make the document, any order revealing the

contents of that document and the brief filed in support of this motion, “Viewable by

Selected Parties and Court” only. 

Respectfully submitted this 29 day of April, 2013. th 

1

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 270 filed 04/29/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

By: s/ Linda Kaufman 

Linda Kaufman

Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

By: s/ Martha Paluch 

Martha Paluch

Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

E-mail: Martha.Paluch@usdoj.gov

2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 270 filed 04/29/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 29th day of April, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following e-mail addresses:

Martin Adam Stuart 

Email: martinstuartlaw@solucian.com

William Lewis Taylor 

Email: wltaylorpc@gmail.com

Darlene Ann Bagley

Email: bagley@ridleylaw.com

Ms. Paula M. Ray

E-mail: paulamray@earthlink.net

 

By: s/ Solange Reigel 

SOLANGE REIGEL

Legal Assistant to AUSA Linda Kaufman

United States Attorney’s Office

1225 - 17 Street, Suite 700 th

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0244

Fax: (303) 454-0402

E-mail: solange.reigel@usdoj.gov

3

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 270 filed 04/29/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01934-DME-BNB

JEFFREY A. BOARDMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

DYLAN HAUCK, an individual, and

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY HONORABLE DAVID M. EBEL

The Trial Preparation Conference scheduled for August 8, 2012, has been rescheduled for 

Thursday, August 9, 2012, at 1:00 p.m.

DATED: August 3, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01934-DME-BNB Document 54 Filed 08/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Edward Gladden, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 232]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the *681Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting possession of a weapon. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he was performing a routine search of petitioner’s single-occupancy room when he found a homemade weapon secreted behind an access panel over the sink. The weapon was fashioned out of a razor blade that had been melted into the handle of a plastic utensil.

The detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it constitute substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, *Matter of Ellington v Goord,*290 AD2d 919, 920). Petitioner’s testimony that the area behind the access panel was equally accessible to the inmate housed in the adjacent room was refuted by the Hearing Officer’s personal inspection of both rooms. Hence, there was no evidence to undermine the general inference that contraband found within an area under an inmate’s direct control is in that inmate’s possession even though access to the area may not be exclusive (see, *Matter of Jackson v Selsky,*288 AD2d 802). Petitioner’s denial of any knowledge of the weapon presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer. The remaining contentions raised by petitioner have been examined and found to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN CORLISS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 449 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-42-01-SM

Christopher Bosch

O R D E R

Defendant Bosch’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document 20). Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2008

trial period. Defendant Bosch shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than August 11, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 25, 2008 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: September 3, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00042-SM Document 21 Filed 08/04/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 4, 2008

cc: Jessica Brown, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00042-SM Document 21 Filed 08/04/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Howard R. Fogle, Jr., et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-388-JD

Wilmington Finance, et al.

O R D E R

On November 4, 2010, an Order was issued that the case as to Defendant Saratoga First

Guarantee Funding would be dismissed on November 12, 2010, unless a return of service or motion

to extend was filed. On November 12, plaintiff filed a Motion to extend time to effect service to

November 26, 2010; the motion was granted on the same day. 

As the November 26 deadline has now passed, and as nothing further has been filed as to

Saratoga First Guarantee Funding, the case as to Saratoga First Guarantee Funding is herewith

ordered dismissed without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED.

December 15, 2010 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Todd Stevens, Esq.

Joy Harmon Sperling, Esq.

Mark Swirbalus, Esq.

Michael Weiss, Esq.

Chad Higgins, Esq.

John Mangones, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00388-JD Document 45 Filed 12/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Opinion issued May 2 3 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 0 0 1 3 1
- CV

——————————— GOODE DELIVERY LLC AND JAMES GOODE , Appellant s V. ARCARIUS LLC , Appellee

O n Appeal from the County Civil C o urt at Law No. 2

H a rri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 12416 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant s , Goode Delivery LLC and James Goode , ha ve neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and have not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified by the Clerk of th is C ourt ’s March 26 , 2019 n otice that2

this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee , appellant s failed to timely respond. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 7.3 ( b) , 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to pay the required clerk’s record fee

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 7.3 ( b ), 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM Pane l consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower

.
Exhibit 99.1





MODEM MEDIA, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





We, Marc C.
Particelli, President and Chief Executive Officer of Modem Media, Inc. (the Company), and Frank J. Connolly, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.








/s/ Marc C.
Particelli

/s/ Frank J. Connolly, Jr.Marc C. Particelli

Frank J. Connolly, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer








August 14, 2002
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 0 0 0

2008...... 1 0 0 2 3

2009...... 2 3 2 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Bertolini, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 695]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.), rendered December 15, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*554Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see *People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of murder in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt of murder in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          1,984,679
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,251,680
<ALLOWANCES>                      404,000
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,532,780
<PP&E>                          1,425,301
<DEPRECIATION>                    269,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,070,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,556,680
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           22,318
<OTHER-SE>                      2,491,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,070,856
<SALES>                         8,459,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                8,459,367
<CGS>                           5,917,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,917,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,921,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,258,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                        7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,380,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,265,759)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (1.02)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Walter S.
Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to
his/her knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
----------------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
July 08, 2005


/S/ MOMOKO A. BERAN
----------------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
July 08, 2005

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
174 La. 822

#### Succession of TAYLOR.

No. 31482.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 25, 1932.

Spencer, Gidiere, Phelps & Dunbar, of New Orleans, for appellant New Orleans Bank & Trust Co.

Hugh M. Wilkinson and A. Miles Coe, both of New Orleans, for appellee administrator.

O’NIELL, C. J.

 The New Orleans Bank & Trust Company, a creditor of the succession of Samuel Walter Taylor, has appealed from an order of court discharging the administrator of the succession and ordering his bond canceled and the surety released. The order or judgment appealed from was rendered ex parte, after the bank and other creditors of the succession -had appealed from a judgment homologating the final account of the administrator. By the decree of this court, the judgment homologating the final account was annulled, and the ease was remanded to the civil district court to permit the appellants, as creditors of the succession, to oppose the account. Succession of Taylor, 172 La. 1099, 136 So. 65. Therefore the order discharging the administrator and ordering his bond canceled and the surety released must -be set aside. An administrator should not be discharged until he has performed his duties completely and has had an account of his administration approved by a decree of the court that appointed him. Succession of Greene, 158 La. 123, 103 So. 532.

The order or judgment appealed from, discharging Walter A. Taylor, as administrator, and ordering his bond canceled and the surety thereon released, is annulled, at the cost of this succession.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00252-CV

Natalia A. FALDT,

Appellant

v.

Chad FALDT,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI-08569

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 12, 2010

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The clerk’s record, which was due on March 15, 2010, has not been filed. On April 1, 2010,

this court ordered appellant to provide written proof by April 12, 2010 that either: (1) the clerk’s fee

has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) appellant is entitled to

appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. The order further warned appellant that failure to timely

respond would result in dismissal of the appeal. Appellant did not respond. The appeal is dismissed
04-10-00252-CV

-2-

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against

appellant.

PER CURIAM
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending December 5, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBASSWOOD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LC                                                                                         CICNotice of Change in Control by Basswood Capital Management, LLC, New York, New York; funds for which Basswood Partners LLC serves as General Partner and Basswood Capital Management, LLC serves as investment manager (Basswood Opportunity Partners, LP; Basswood Financial Fund, LP; Basswood Financial Long Only Fund, LP); Basswood Capital Management, LLC serves as investment manager (Basswood Opportunity Fund, Inc. and Basswood Financial Fund, Inc.); certain managed accounts for which Basswood Capital Management, LLC serves as the investment adviser; Matthew Lindenbaum and Bennett Lindenbaum, all of New York, New York, to collectively acquire up to 24.9 % of the outstanding voting shares of Esquire Financial Holdings, Inc, and indirectly its subsidiary bank, Esquire Bank NA, both of Jericho, New York.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/18/2020EMPIRE STATE BANK                                                                                                       * BranchEmpire State Bank, Newburgh, New York, to establish two branch offices to be located at:  (1) 1441 South Avenue, and (2) 2212 Hylan Boulevard, both of Staten Island, New York.Newspaper: 12/04/2020Federal Register: Not applicablePEAPACK-GLADSTONE BANK                                                                                                  * BranchPeapack-Gladstone Bank, Gladstone, New Jersey, to establish a branch office, located at 104 Ely Place, Boonton, New Jersey.Newspaper: 12/08/2020Federal Register: Not applicableSBD BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 3A1SBD Bancorp, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of shares in The Savings Bank of Danbury, both of Danbury, Connecticut, pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended and Section 225.15 of Regulation Y.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/07/2021
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1335 CA 15-00894**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

JUSTIN COFFEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., DEFENDANT.

------------------------------------------ WORLDWIDE INDUSTRIES CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

V
CDK INDUSTRIES, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (STEPHEN A. DAVOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
STANLEY LAW OFFICES, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. QUATTROCCI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered November 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. for leave to reargue and/or renew its motion for summary judgment.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 28, 2015,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court