alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted),
 the undersigned, Mark R. Doede, President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
 Financial Officer of Integral Vision, Inc. (the Company), hereby
 certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:                  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|1.       The
 Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007
 (thePeriodic Report), to which this Certification
 is attached as Exhibit 32.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section
 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
 and
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|2.       The
 information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
 covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for
 the period covered by the Periodic Report.             

|       |                |                                                                                  | 
|------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|DATED: | March 31, 2008 |                                                                                  | 
|       |                |                                                                                  | 
|       |                | /S/ Mark R.
 Doede                                                              
|       |                |                                                                                 
|       |                | Mark R.
 Doede
 President, Chief Operating Officer,
 and Chief Financial Officer

42

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

July 23, 2004                                   /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                           Vice President and Chief Financial
                                            Officer
**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, the chief financial officer of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.
      (the “Company”), certifies that to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 (the “Annual Report”),
      which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





The
      foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no person shall be
      entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any other purpose. The
      undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
      certification except as required by law.







/s/
                Richard C. CogginsRichard
                C. CogginsChief
                Financial Officer





Date:
      December 20, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                           
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 5, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    TAKEO K. SASAKI    
|                  |  |  |  | Takeo K. Sasaki           
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof WorldHeart Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Jal S. Jassawalla, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; as amended and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of September 30, 2005.

 
| Dated:   November 9,  2005 | /s/ * Jal S.  Jassawalla |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                           |                     | Jal S.  Jassawalla, President and Chief |
|                                           |                     | Executive  Officer |
|                                           |                     | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----

*******                **A signedoriginal of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58138-58142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-87]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-87 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: September 25, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 58139]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC08.000


[[Page 58140]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC08.001


[[Page 58141]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC08.002


[[Page 58142]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06OC08.003

 [FR Doc. E8-23332 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01953-LTB Document 2 Filed 08/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending October 19, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodEAST WEST BANK                                                                                                          * 18CEast West Bank, Pasadena, California, to merge with MetroBank, National Association, Houston Texas, with East West Bank as the surviving entity. Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableEAST WEST BANK                                                                                                          * 18CEast West Bank, Pasadena, California, to merge with Metro United Bank, San Diego, California, with East West Bank as the surviving entity.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableNCAL BANCORP                                                                                                            CICChange in Bank Control Notice by Alex Meruelo, Newport Coast, California, to acquire up to 89 percent of NCAL Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire National Bank of California, both of Los Angeles, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/24/2013TFB BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 3A1TFB Bancorp, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The Foothills Bank, both of Yuma, Arizona.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 300 George Street, East Alton, IL 62024, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                     

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on June 13, 2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2009. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060. 

      ( print page 7574)    
Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E8-2317 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Case 1:11-cv-02214-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02214-BNB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
#### WILISCH v. VAN LOON.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 83181 

FILE 

ZANE MICHAEL FLOYD, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 

CHARLES DANIELS, DIRECTOR, 

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS; AND IHSAN AZZAM, 

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER OF THE 

STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res • ondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a district court order refusing to grant a 

preliminary injunction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; 

Adriana Escobar, Judge. Appellant Zane Michael Floyd argues that the 

district court incorrectly applied the appropriate legal standard in denying 

relief.1 

Respondents argue that this appeal should be dismissed as 

moot, as the district court denied the relief Floyd sought in dismissing his 

complaint for injunctive relief. We agree that this appeal is moot. See 

Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308, 

314 (1999) ("Generally, an appeal from the grant of a preliminary injunction 

'Floyd also requested a temporary restraining order below, though he 

does not argue this matter on appeal, and we need not address it. See Sicor, 

Inc. v. Sacks, 127 Nev. 896, 900, 266 P.3d 618, 620 (2011) (observing that a 

temporary restraining order is not appealable). 

Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(1), we have determined that oral argument 

is not warranted in this appeal. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 4101.* 72- 
becomes moot when the trial court enters a permanent injunction, because 

the former merges into the latter."); Manzonie v. State ex rel. De Ricco, 81 

Nev. 53, 55, 398 P.2d 694, 695 (1965) ("[I]n view of the dismissal of the 

complaint, the existence of which is necessary to permit the granting of an 

injunction, the question of the propriety of an injunction became moot."). 

Floyd argues that the appeal should nevertheless be 

entertained as the issues it raises are capable of repetition, yet evading 

review. Cf. Univ. & Crnty. Coll. Sys. of Nev. v. Nevadans for Sound Gov't, 

120 Nev. 712, 720, 100 P.3d 179, 186 (2004) (Even when an appeal is moot, 

however, this court may consider it when the matter is capable of repetition, 

yet evading review."). We disagree. Floyd's claims are well-suited for 

review in the appeal from the district court's order dismissing the complaint 

for injunctive relief, currently pending under Docket No. 84081. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

 J. 

Hardesty Stiglich 

J. J. 

Cadish Silver 

J. 

Herndon 

2 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A QS*, 
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge 

Federal Public Defender/Las Vegas 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark Hill PLC 

Attorney General/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

( 0) I947A <40m 

3
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 18, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -01034- CR

JOSE ERNEST ADAME, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1426474

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Jose Ernest Adame pleaded guilty to assault of a f amily member with bodily injury

. Appellant and the State agreed appellant’s punishment would not
exceed three years’ imprisonment . O n June 9, 2014 , the trial court sentenced appellant i n accordance with the terms of his agreement with the State. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on Novem ber 12 , 2018

. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal for two reasons: the notice of appeal was not filed timely, and this is a plea bargain case with no appealable matters and2

appellant has not been granted permission to appeal.
First, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements
of Rule 26 .2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed more than four years after sentence was imposed. Therefore, the appeal was not timely perfected, and we lack jurisdiction.
Second, in a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only matters raised by a written , pretrial motion or with the tri al court’s permission. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Appellant’s punishment does not exceed the agreed length of confinement. The record does not contain any appealable pretrial rulings , and the trial court did not grant appellant permission to appeal.
Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jewell

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Gregory *v.*Huslander, Appellant.

*Payment*— Receipts—Attorney *and client*— Evidence.

1. A receipt given by a client to her attorney “in full payment” of a certain sale transaction is prima facie evidence of a settlement in full of the matter to which it refers, and is not to be set aside except for fraud, accident or mistake, but it is always open to explanation or correction.

2. A receipt is like any other parol admission by the party, open to contradiction, explanation or correction.

Argued Feb. 22, 1910.

Appeal, No. 354,

Jan. T., 1910, by *608defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1907, No. 1,661, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Laura A. Gregory v. W. S. Huslander.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Móschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit for money alleged to be due. Before Edwards, P. J. '

The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for 13,043.24. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*among others was the answer to defendant’s third point as follows:

3. If the jury believe that Laura A. Gregory executed the receipt dated December 9, 1904, it is prima facie evidence of settlement and should not be set aside except for fraud, accident or mistake, and the cause of setting it aside should distinctly appear. *Answer:*I affirm this point, but I add to it the following explanation: that a receipt is like any other parol admission of the party signing it, and it is open to explanation or correction, and he may show that it was made by mistake or does not exhibit the truth or state all the facts.

*S. B. Price,*with him *J. F. Scragg, C. B. Price*and *J. E. Davis,*for appellant.

*W. N. Leach,*with him *George Morrow,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

March 28, 1910:

This action was by a client against her attorney to recover money alleged to be due her on an account growing out of the purchase and sale of a tract of coal. The plaintiff furnished the purchase money and by agreement the title was placed in the defendant’s name and he executed a declaration of trust for an undivided half interest and agreed to pay the plaintiff one-half of the proceeds of the sale of the coal. The-questions of fact were carefully submitted to the jury, *609and a discussion of them would serve no useful purpose. The instruction in relation to the effect of a receipt “in full payment of a share of coal sold,” given by the plaintiff to the defendant, was free from error. Such a receipt is prima facie evidence of a settlement in full of the matter to which it refers, and is not to be set aside except for fraud, accident or mistake, but it is always open to explanation or correction. “A receipt is like any other parol admission by the party, open to contradiction, explanation or correction:” Russell v. Church, 65 Pa. 9.

The judgment is affirmed.