alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, February 1-5, 20Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,044,105 38,819 138,127 373,297 251,386 95,992 4,6Number of loans 16,485 580 1,785 7,212 3,770 949 Weighted average maturity (months)1 14.74 11.76 14.06 17.95 15.71 5.99 3.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.80 6.49 7.77 4.68 4.56 .63 1.4

Weighted average risk rating3 3.25 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate 4 4.78 5.94 4.96 4.83 4.21 4.34 4.

 Standard error5 .28 .32 .24 .30 .50 .59 1.0

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.75 6.18 5.32 5.75 5.13 4.85 3.5 25th percentile 3.79 5.11 4.50 3.82 3.04 3.56 3.5 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.70 2.93 4.85 4.88 4.18 n.a. 4.5 Other livestock 10.44 4.46 5.09 3.94 4.22 n.a. 8. Other current operating expenses7 5.43 5.03 5.22 4.88 4.73 3.58 5.9

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.71 6.15 4.74 4.56 10.24 n.a. 6.4 Farm real estate 6.35 6.14 6.26 5.63 n.a. 10.20 5.9 Other8 3.41 3.44 3.11 3.46 3.92 2.38 3.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 77.90 34.63 56.85 82.01 86.38 91.22 87. Under commitment 70.51 36.05 42.74 77.92 89.18 94.03 74.0 Callable 15.03 14.12 19.14 19.37 14.70 .79 7.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.64 7.76 6.17 6.61 3.75 2.02 n Other livestock 5.78 10.49 .13 2.02 4.29 39.09 n Other current operating expenses7 54.98 70.34 82.60 59.30 32.74 34.83 64. Farm machinery and equipment 6.02 1.97 2.51 7.92 9.99 .32 n Farm real estate 5.00 5.07 6.40 6.01 4.55 n.a. 12.2 Other8 21.59 4.36 2.19 18.13 44.69 23.74 23.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 11.61 11.96 9.72 12.34 9.34 1.54 n Other 85.73 80.46 87.44 83.15 90.16 98.46 86.7 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Caldarone, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Calton, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
     covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.


Date:   February 24, 2006

/s/ Anthony J. Caldarone
------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2071

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for eligibility

for coverage of home health services under the Medicare Program on

the basis of a need for occupational therapy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mr. ANDREWS (for himself, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, and

Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for eligibility for coverage of home health services under

the Medicare Program on the basis of a need for occupational therapy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Occupational

5 Therapy Coverage Eligibility Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2071 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOME HEALTH SERVICES ON THE

2 BASIS OF A NEED FOR OCCUPATIONAL THER3 APY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and

5 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

6 1395f(a)(2)(C) and 1395n(a)(2)(A)) are each amended by

7 striking ‘‘or speech therapy’’ and all that follows through

8 ‘‘need occupational therapy’’ and inserting ‘‘, occupa9 tional, or speech therapy’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to home health services provided

12 on or after October 1, 2001.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. 

Naperville, Illinois 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Factory Card &Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of April 29, 2006, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended April 29, 2006 and April 30, 2005. Theseinterim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It issubstantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken asa whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to suchcondensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary as of January 28,2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006 (not presented herein); and in our report dated April 17, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinionon those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 29, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidatedbalance sheet from which it has been derived. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

June 5, 2006 

 

28
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending September 30, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFULL SERVICE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.                                                                                     * 3A3Full Service Insurance Agency, Inc., Buxton, North Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of The First and Farmers Bank Holding Company and thereby indirectly acquire The First and Farmers Bank, both of Portland, North Dakota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/20/2017
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedcertifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golf Trust ofAmerica, Inc.

 
| Date: August  13, 2003 |                                                 |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                 |
|                   | /s/  W. Bradley Blair, II                       |   |
|                   | W. Bradley  Blair, II                                |
|                   | *President and Chief Executive Officer*              |
|                   |                                                 |
|                   |                                                 |
| Date: August  13, 2003 |                                                 |
|                   |                                                 |
|                   | /s/  Scott D. Peters                            |   |
|                   | Scott D.  Peters                                     |
|                   | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER FOR DESIGNATION OF WITNESSES

Pursuant to the defendant’s motion, filed August 17, 2007 [Doc. 234] and the

plaintiff’s response, filed August 22, 2007 [Doc. 235] it is

ORDERED that Climax Molybdenum Company shall file its designation of the

order of witnesses it will call in its case in chief by September 7th, 2007 and the

defendant Molychem, LLC will file its designation of witnesses by September 12th,

2007. The designations shall list the sequence in which the witnesses are expected to

be called but the Court recognizes that some alteration of that sequence may be

required for accommodation at time of trial

Dated: August 22ND, 2007

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 236 Filed 08/22/07 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          49,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,133,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                   225,904
<INVENTORY>                                  4,262,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,204,313
<PP&E>                                       6,004,654
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,825,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,714,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,629,467
<BONDS>                                      4,815,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,020
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,231,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,714,399
<SALES>                                      4,075,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,075,332
<CGS>                                        3,141,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,141,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,482,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (649,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (186,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (463,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (463,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AWARENESS LETTER FROM DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP DATED DECEMBER 4, 2003 CONCERNINGUNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

 

December 4, 2003 

 

Factory Card &Party Outlet Corp. 

2727 Diehl Road 

Naperville, Illinois 60563 

 

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial informationof Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary for the three-month and nine-month periods ended November 1, 2003 (Successor Company operations), the three-month and seven-month periods ended November 2, 2002 (Successor Company operations),and the two-month period ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company operations), as indicated in our report dated December 4, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended November 1, 2003, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-92248, 333-98549, and 333-108222 on Form S-8. 

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statementprepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago,Illinois
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22663]



[[Page 56611]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on Development and 
Evaluation of a Gas Chromatograph Testing Protocol

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 26, 2008, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute--Cooperative Research Group on Development and Evaluation of 
a Gas Chromatograph Testing Protocol (``GCTP'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, EffeTech, Ltd., 
Staffordshire, UNITED KINGDOM has been added as a party to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and GCTP intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 6, 2008, GCTP filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in 
the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 7, 
2008 (73 FR 18813).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 4, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40882).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E8-22663 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14 , 2023

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00883

- CV

BARKER CROSSING CLA PARTNERS, LTD., RIVERSTONE CLA PARTNERS LTD., LASCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, CALCO

ADA, LTD., AND LARY SELIGMANN , A ppellant s
V.

VERITEX COMMUNITY BANK , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 15932

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a n order signed September 1, 2022 . No clerk’s record
has been filed. Th e c lerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On December 30, 2022 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the
court’s intentio n to dismiss the appeal for w a nt of prosecution unless, within2

fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed. On February 16, 202 3 , appellant w as ordered to pr ov i de this court with proof of payment for the record on or before February 27, 202 3

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). I n the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in dismissal of the appeal. See T ex. R

. A pp. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed.
Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. We dismiss the appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS Document 6 Filed 10/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### Katie R. Latta et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*William Hockmeyer et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Nassau County,

December 18,1956.

*176*Lendenbaum & Young,*for Katie R. Latta and another, plaintiffs.

*Golden, Lefkowits & Rapport*for Marie Pastore and another, plaintiffs.

*Jesse Dillon*for Charles W. Latta, plaintiff.

*McCarthy & McGrath*for John Madison, defendant.

*Bernard Relfenstein*for William Hockmeyer, defendant.

Percy D. Stoddart, J.

Motion for a preference in the. trial of an action for personal injuries.

The papers submitted do not disclose that a jury was waived “by stipulation filed with the calendar clerk or by any other mode prescribed by statute (Civil Practice Act, § 426) ” as required by rule 7 of the Nassau County Supreme Court Rules for trial terms. Therefore, a preference may not be granted under the aforesaid rule 7.

With respect to a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice, it must also be held that the papers submitted are inadequate.

The plaintiff has not submitted (1) the pleadings (2) an affidavit of merits (3) an affidavit of a physician averring that it is unlikely the plaintiff movant will live until the trial of the cause in its regular order or (4) an affidavit of the plaintiff sufficiently disclosing her economic status.

Accordingly, the application for a preference will be denied without prejudice to a renewal upon proper papers.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DAVID D. EVERIST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST 

SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE

INTERIOR, DAYNE BARRON, ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF U.S. AND DOUGLAS FONG, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND

CITY OF MEDFORD, OREGON, MARK D. CLARKE,

JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, AND OWEN M. PANNER, 

Defendants.

______________________ 

2014-1358

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Oregon in No. 1:14-cv-00199-CL, Magistrate 

Judge Mark D. Clark.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

Case: 14-1358 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 05/30/2014
2 EVERIST v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

O R D E R

 This court considers whether this appeal should 

be transferred due to lack of jurisdiction. 

David D. Everist appeals a decision from the United 

States District Court for the District of Oregon that 

dismissed his complaint appearing to allege violations 

under the Federal Land Policy Management Act and 

Executive Order # 12630. This court is a court of limited 

jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Based only upon our 

review, it is not clear that the District of Oregon’s jurisdiction arose in whole or in part under the laws governing 

this court’s appellate jurisdiction. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) Everist is directed to show cause within 21 days 

from the date of this order why his appeal should not be 

transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The appellees are also directed to respond within that time.

 (2) The briefing schedule is stayed.

 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

s24

Case: 14-1358 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 05/30/2014