UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



Form 10-KSB



(Mark One)

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from _________to _________



Commission file number 0-11723



CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)



|                                |                     
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|California                      | 94-2883067          
|(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    
|incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.)



55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)



Registrant's telephone number

(864) 239-1000



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



None



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:



Limited Partnership Units

(Title of class)

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. [ ]



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesX No___



Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  []



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes []  No[X]



State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $8,961,000



State the aggregate market value of the Limited Partnership Units ("Units") held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as of December 31, 2007. No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None



Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):  Yes [ ]; No [X]









PART I



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of redevelopments, the Partnerships future financial performance, including the Partnerships ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the Partnerships control including, without limitation: natural disasters such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnerships properties and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; financing risks, including the risk that the Partnerships cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; insurance risks; development risks; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership.   Readers should carefully review the Partnerships financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the section entitled Risk Factors described in Item 1 of this Annual Report and the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Item 1.

Description of Business



General



Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2 (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") was organized on April 12, 1983, as a limited partnership under the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act. On July 22, 1983, the Partnership registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 2-83540) and commenced a public offering for the sale of limited partnership units (Units). The Units represent equity interests in the Partnership and entitle the holders thereof to participate in certain allocations and distributions of the Partnership. The sale of Units terminated on July 21, 1985, with 912,182 Units sold at $250 each, or gross proceeds of approximately $227.8 million to the Partnership. As permitted under its Partnership Agreement (the original partnership agreement of the Partnership with all amendments shall be referred to as the "Partnership Agreement"), the Partnership has repurchased and retired a total of 3,048 Units for a total of $611,000. A total of 103.40 Units were abandoned and accordingly retired by the Partnership. The Partnership may, at its absolute discretion, repurchase Units, but is under no obligation to do so. Since its initial offering, the Partnership has not received, nor are limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions.



Upon the Partnership's formation in 1983, Consolidated Capital Equities Corporation (CCEC), a Colorado corporation, was the corporate general partner. In 1988, through a series of transactions, Southmark Corporation ("Southmark") acquired controlling interest in CCEC. In December 1988, CCEC filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code ("Chapter 11"). In 1990, as part of CCEC's reorganization plan, ConCap Equities, Inc. ("CEI" or the "General Partner") acquired CCEC's general partner interests in the Partnership and in 15 other affiliated public limited partnerships (the "Affiliated Partnerships") and CEI replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships. The selection of CEI as the general partner was approved by a majority of the limited partners in the Partnership and in each of the Affiliated Partnerships pursuant to a solicitation of the Limited Partners dated August 10, 1990. As part of this solicitation, the Limited Partners also approved an amendment to the Partnership Agreement to limit changes of control of the Partnership. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2013 unless terminated prior to such date.



The Partnership has no employees. Management and administrative services are performed by the General Partner and by agents retained by the General Partner. An affiliate of the General Partner has been providing such property management services.



Risk Factors



The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted throughout this Report describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Partnerships actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.



Failure to generate sufficient net operating income may limit the Partnerships ability to repay advances from affiliates.



The Partnerships ability to repay advances from affiliates depends on its ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Net operating income may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond the Partnerships control, including:



·

the general economic climate;

·

competition from other apartment communities and other housing options;

·

local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates;

·

changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance;

·

increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents;

·

changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; and

·

changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.



The Partnerships existing and future debt financing could render it unable to operate, result in foreclosure on its properties or prevent it from making distributions on its equity.



The Partnerships strategy is generally to incur debt to increase the return on its equity while maintaining acceptable interest coverage ratios. Payments of principal and interest may leave the Partnership with insufficient cash resources to operate its properties or pay distributions.  The Partnership is also subject to the risk that its cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If the Partnership fails to make required payments of principal and interest on secured debt, its lenders could foreclose on the properties securing such debt, which would result in loss of income and asset value to the Partnership.



Competition could limit the Partnerships ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rents.



The Partnerships apartment properties compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in such market area could adversely affect the Partnerships ability to lease apartments and to increase or maintain rental rates.









Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in the Partnerships incurrence of unanticipated expenses.



Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped. These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to the Partnerships properties, or restrict renovations of the properties. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although the Partnership believes that its properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, the Partnership may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA.



Potential liability or other expenditures associated with potential environmental contamination may be costly.



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be costly.



The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.



A further description of the Partnership's business is included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" included in "Item 6" of this Form 10-KSB.









Item 2.

Description of Properties



The following table sets forth the Partnership's investment in properties:



|                            |             |                           |          
|--------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------- | ---------
|                            | Date of     |                           |          
|Properties                  | Acquisition | Type of Ownership         | Use      
|                            |             |                           |          
|Canyon Crest Apartments     | 08/22/02    | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Littleton, Colorado         |             | first mortgage            | 90 units 
|                            |             |                           |          
|Highcrest Townhomes         | 08/22/02    | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Wood Ridge, Illinois        |             | first mortgage            | 176 units
|                            |             |                           |          
|Windemere Apartments        | 08/28/02    | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Houston, Texas              |             | first mortgage            | 257 units
|                            |             |                           |          
|Glenbridge Manor Apartments | 09/01/03    | Fee ownership, subject to | Apartment
|Cincinnati, Ohio            |             | first mortgage            | 290 units



Schedule of Properties



Set forth below for each of the Partnership's properties is the gross carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life, method of depreciation, and Federal tax basis.



|                 |                |              |             |                |          
|---------------- | -------------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------------- | ---------
|                 | Gross          |              |             | Method         |          
|                 | Carrying       | Accumulated  | Depreciable | of             | Federal  
|Properties       | Value          | Depreciation | Life        | Depreciation   | Tax Basis
|                 | (in thousands) |              |             | (in thousands)
|                 |                |              |             |                |          
|Canyon Crest     |                |              |             |                |          
|Apartments       | $ 6,526        | $ 1,229      | 5-30 yrs    | S/L            | $ 5,039  
|Highcrest        |                |              |             |                |          
|Townhomes        | 13,267         | 3,318        | 5-30 yrs    | S/L            | 10,357   
|Windemere        |                |              |             |                |          
|Apartments       | 10,380         | 1,892        | 5-30 yrs    | S/L            | 8,232    
|Glenbridge Manor |                |              |             |                |          
|Apartments       | 30,990         | 5,101        | 5-30 yrs    | S/L            | 25,543   
|Totals           | $61,163        | $11,540      |             |                | $49,171  



See "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the financial statements included in "Item 7. Financial Statements" for a description of the Partnership's depreciation and capitalization policies.













Schedule of Property Indebtedness



The following table sets forth certain information relating to the loans encumbering the Partnership's properties.



|                        |                |          |           |          |               
|----------------------- | -------------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | --------------
|                        | Principal      |          |           |          | Principal     
|                        | Balance At     | Stated   |           |          | Balance       
|                        | December 31,   | Interest | Period    | Maturity | Due at        
|Property                | 2007           | Rate(1)  | Amortized | Date     | Maturity (2)  
|                        | (in thousands) |          |           |          | (in thousands)
|                        |                |          |           |          |               
|Canyon Crest Apartments | $ 2,903        | 7.10%    | 20 yrs    | 01/01/10 | $ 2,613       
|Highcrest Townhomes     | 11,153         | 6.17%    | 30 yrs    | 10/01/17 | 9,414         
|Windemere Apartments    | 4,883          | 7.83%    | 20 yrs    | 11/01/10 | 4,189         
|Glenbridge Manor        |                |          |           |          |               
|Apartments              | 19,749         | 5.65%    | 25 yrs    | 12/15/13 | 16,566        
|                        |                |          |           |          |               
|                        | 38,688         |          |           |          |               
|Mortgage premiums, net  | 177            |          |           |          |               
|Total                   | $38,865        |          |           |          | $32,782       



(1)

Fixed rate mortgages.



(2)

See Note B  Mortgage Notes Payable" to the financial statements included in "Item 7. Financial Statements for information with respect to the Partnership's ability to prepay these loans and other specific details about these loans.



On September 28, 2007, the Partnership refinanced the mortgage debt encumbering Highcrest Townhomes. The refinancing replaced the existing mortgage debt, which at the time of refinancing had a principal balance of approximately $5,482,000, with a new mortgage loan in the principal amount of $11,175,000.  The new mortgage loan bears interest at 6.17% per annum and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $68,000 beginning on November 1, 2007 through the October 1, 2017 maturity date, with a balloon payment of approximately $9,414,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to October 1, 2018.  Total capitalized loan costs associated with the new mortgage were approximately $213,000. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing.



Rental Rates and Occupancy



Average annual rental rate per unit and occupancy for 2007 and 2006 for each property are as follows:



|                            |                |           |      |     
|--------------------------- | -------------- | --------- | ---- | ----
|                            | Average Annual | Average  
|                            | Rental Rate    | Occupancy
|                            | (per unit)     |           |     
|Properties                  | 2007           | 2006      | 2007 | 2006
|                            |                |           |      |     
|Canyon Crest Apartments     | $ 9,126        | $ 8,719   | 94%  | 94% 
|Highcrest Townhomes         | 12,094         | 11,708    | 97%  | 95% 
|Windemere Apartments        | 6,822          | 7,165     | 91%  | 90% 
|Glenbridge Manor Apartments | 13,128         | 12,969    | 96%  | 95% 



As noted under "Item 1. Description of Business", the real estate industry is highly competitive. All of the properties of the Partnership are subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The General Partner believes that all of the properties are adequately insured. Each property is an apartment complex which leases units for lease terms of one year or less. No residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space. All of the properties are in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this type and age.



Real Estate Taxes and Rates



Real estate taxes and rates in 2007 for each property were as follows:



|                            |                |      
|--------------------------- | -------------- | -----
|                            | 2007           | 2007 
|                            | Billing        | Rate 
|                            | (in thousands) |      
|                            |                |      
|Canyon Crest Apartments     | $ 39           | 7.61%
|Highcrest Townhomes         | 290            | 7.26%
|Windemere Apartments        | 196            | 2.63%
|Glenbridge Manor Apartments | 527            | 6.99%



Capital Improvements



Canyon Crest Apartments



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $481,000 of capital improvements at Canyon Crest Apartments, consisting primarily of window replacement, energy conservation upgrades, structural improvements, air conditioning unit and floor covering replacements, and construction related to the casualty discussed in Item 6. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow and insurance proceeds. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Highcrest Townhomes



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $135,000 of capital improvements at Highcrest Townhomes, consisting primarily of heating upgrades, exterior painting and floor covering and water heater replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Windemere Apartments



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $289,000 of capital improvements at Windemere Apartments, consisting primarily of structural improvements, air conditioning unit upgrades, exterior lighting, foundation upgrades, kitchen and bath resurfacing, interior improvements, and floor covering replacement. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.











Glenbridge Manor Apartments



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $284,000 of capital improvements at Glenbridge Manor Apartments, consisting primarily of structural improvements, appliance and floor covering replacements, and construction related to the casualty discussed in Item 6. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation. These improvements were funded from operations and insurance proceeds.  The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from an affiliate of the General Partner.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnerships distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.



Item 3.

Legal Proceedings



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group(the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review. The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.













On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.  On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.



On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. The matter was argued and submitted and the Court of Appeal issued an opinion on February 20, 2008 affirming the order approving the settlement and judgment entered thereto. On March 12, 2008, the Court of Appeal denied Appellants Petition for Re-Hearing.  Appellant has until April 1, 2008 to file a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court.





The General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.



Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



The unit holders of the Partnership did not vote on any matter through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.











PART II



Item 5.

Market for Partnership Equity and Related Partner Matters



The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership, offered and sold 912,182 limited partnership units (the "Units") aggregating $227,800,000. The Partnership currently has 15,452 holders of record owning an aggregate of 909,030.2 Units. Affiliates of the General Partner owned 573,182.05 Units or approximately 63.05% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007. No public trading market has developed for the Units, and it is not anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.



There were no distributions made by the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations and the timing of debt maturities, property sales and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the General Partner at December 31, 2007, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2008 or subsequent periods. See "Item 2. Description of Properties - Capital Improvements" for information relating to anticipated capital expenditures at the properties.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 573,182.05 Units in the Partnership representing 63.05% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 63.05% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Item 6.

Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation



This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.



The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment properties, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment properties, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing plan of the Partnership, the General Partner monitors the rental market environment of each of its investment properties to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expense. As part of this plan, the General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions; accordingly, there is no guarantee that the General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnerships financial results.











Results of Operations



The Partnerships net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $1,599,000, compared to a net loss of approximately $1,044,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.  The increase in net loss is due to an increase in total expenses, partially offset by an increase in total revenues and distributions received in excess of investment.



Total expenses increased due to increases in operating, depreciation, property tax and general and administrative expenses. Interest expense remained relatively constant for the comparable periods. Operating expenses increased primarily due to increases in insurance expense as a result of increased insurance premiums at Glenbridge Manor Apartments and Highcrest Townhomes and advertising, contract services, utility and payroll related expenses at Windemere Apartments.  Depreciation expense increased due to property improvements and replacements placed into service primarily at three of the properties during the past twelve months.  Property tax expense increased primarily due to increases in the tax rate at Glenbridge Manor Apartments and the assessed value of Highcrest Townhomes and Canyon Crest Apartments.



In February 2007, Glenbridge Manor Apartments experienced damages of approximately $35,000 as a result of frozen pipes.  During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $3,000, which is included in operating expenses, as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $25,000, net of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $28,000.



In October 2007, Canyon Crest Apartments experienced damages of approximately $31,000 as a result of a kitchen fire. During the year ended December 2007, the Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $2,000, which is included in operating expenses, as a result of the expected receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $21,000, approximately $12,000 of which was received during the year ended December 31, 2007, net of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $23,000.



General and administrative expenses increased due to an adjustment recognized during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 to the cost of services included in management reimbursements charged by the General Partner related to the year ended December 31, 2005 as allowed under the Partnership Agreement.  The General Partner determined that the Partnership was overcharged for management reimbursements for the year ended December 31, 2005 in the amount of approximately $359,000. General and administrative expenses also increased due to increases in management reimbursements to an affiliate of the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.



Total revenues increased due to increases in both rental and other income. Rental income increased due to increases in the average rental rate at three properties and occupancy at three properties, partially offset by a decrease in the average rental rate at Windemere Apartments and an increase in bad debt expense. Other income increased primarily due increases in resident utility payments and lease cancellation fees at three of the Partnerships investment properties.



The equity in loss from investment is due to the recognition of the Partnerships share of loss on its investments in affiliated partnerships. These investments are accounted for on the equity method of accounting. Distributions from the affiliated partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the statements of operations. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership recognized approximately $98,000 of income from distributions from an affiliated partnership in which the Partnerships investment balance had been reduced to zero.  The Partnership did not recognize equity in income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



At December 31, 2007, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $454,000, compared to approximately $474,000 at December 31, 2006. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $20,000 is due to approximately $1,015,000 and $149,000 of cash used in investing and operating activities, respectively, partially offset by approximately $1,144,000 of cash provided by financing activities. Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements and net deposits to a restricted escrow, partially offset by distributions received from an affiliated partnership and insurance proceeds received. Cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes and advances received from an affiliate of the General Partner, partially offset by repayment of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes, repayment of advances received from an affiliate of the General Partner, principal payments made on the mortgages encumbering the Partnerships investment properties, a prepayment penalty and loan costs paid. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.



The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the properties to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the properties.  While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008.  Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the properties as well as replacement reserves and anticipated cash flow generated by the properties.  Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not required to provide such advances.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.



The Partnership's assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near-term needs (exclusive of capital improvements) of the Partnership.  On September 28, 2007, the Partnership refinanced the mortgage debt encumbering Highcrest Townhomes. The refinancing replaced the existing mortgage debt, which at the time of refinancing had a principal balance of approximately $5,482,000, with a new mortgage loan in the principal amount of $11,175,000.  The new mortgage loan bears interest at 6.17% per annum and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $68,000 beginning on November 1, 2007 through the October 1, 2017 maturity date, with a balloon payment of approximately $9,414,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to October 1, 2018.  Total capitalized loan costs associated with the new mortgage were approximately $213,000 and are included in other assets on the balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements. The Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $18,000, which is included in interest expense, as a result of a prepayment penalty paid, partially offset by the write off of the unamortized mortgage premium.  As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing.



The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Canyon Crest Apartments and Windemere Apartments of approximately $7,786,000 is being amortized over 240 months and requires balloon payments totaling approximately $6,802,000 in 2010. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Glenbridge Manor Apartments of approximately $19,749,000 is being amortized over 300 months and requires a balloon payment of approximately $16,566,000 in 2013. The General Partner will attempt to refinance such indebtedness and or sell the properties prior to such maturity dates.  If the properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing such properties through foreclosure.



There were no distributions made by the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations and the timing of debt maturities, property sales and/or refinancings. The Partnership's cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. In light of the amounts accrued and payable to affiliates of the General Partner at December 31, 2007, there can be no assurance that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners in 2008 or subsequent periods.



Other



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 573,182.05 Units in the Partnership representing 63.05% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 63.05% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



A summary of the Partnerships significant accounting policies is included in "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the financial statements in "Item 7. Financial Statements. The General Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnerships operating results and financial condition. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnerships accounting policies in many areas.  The Partnership believes that of its  significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Investment properties are stated at their fair market value at the time of foreclosure, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.













Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnerships investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnerships assets.



Capitalized Costs Related to Redevelopment and Construction Projects



The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects. Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Costs and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level.



Revenue Recognition



The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.











Item 7.

Financial Statements



CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Balance Sheet - December 31, 2007



Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Statements of Changes in Partners' (Deficiency) Capital - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Notes to Financial Statements











Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Partners

Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2





We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2 as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' (deficiency) capital, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2 at December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.





/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP







Greenville, South Carolina

March 28, 2008











CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



BALANCE SHEET

(in thousands, except unit data)



December 31, 2007





|                                               |           |         
|---------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------
|Assets                                         |           |         
|Cash and cash equivalents                      |           | $    454
|Receivables and deposits                       |           | 202     
|Restricted escrow                              |           | 79      
|Other assets                                   |           | 560     
|Investment in affiliated partnerships (Note E) |           | 627     
|Investment properties (Notes B, D, and G):     |           |         
|Land                                           | 11,154    |         
|Buildings and related personal property        | 50,009    |         
|                                               | 61,163    |         
|Accumulated depreciation                       | (11,540)  | 49,623  
|                                               |           | $51,545 
|Liabilities and Partners' (Deficiency) Capital |           |         
|Liabilities                                    |           |         
|Accounts payable                               |           | $    221
|Distributions payable                          |           | 141     
|Accrued property taxes                         |           | 1,064   
|Due to affiliates (Note C)                     |           | 410     
|Tenant security deposit liabilities            |           | 180     
|Other liabilities                              |           | 399     
|Mortgage notes payable (Note B)                |           | 38,865  
|                                               |           |         
|Partners' (Deficiency) Capital                 |           |         
|General partner                                | $   (420) |         
|Limited partners (909,030.2 units issued and   |           |         
|outstanding)                                   | 10,685    | 10,265  
|                                               |           | $51,545 





See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements











CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)







|                                               |                          |         
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------
|                                               | Years Ended December 31,
|                                               | 2007                     | 2006    
|Revenues:                                      |                          |         
|Rental income                                  | $ 7,934                  | $ 7,861 
|Other income                                   | 1,027                    | 855     
|Total revenues                                 | 8,961                    | 8,716   
|                                               |                          |         
|Expenses:                                      |                          |         
|Operating                                      | 3,963                    | 3,609   
|General and administrative (Note C)            | 652                      | 183     
|Depreciation                                   | 2,587                    | 2,536   
|Interest                                       | 2,379                    | 2,380   
|Property taxes                                 | 1,072                    | 1,052   
|Total expenses                                 | 10,653                   | 9,760   
|                                               |                          |         
|Loss from operations                           | (1,692)                  | (1,044) 
|Equity in loss from investments (Note E)       | (5)                      | --      
|Distributions in excess of investment (Note E) | 98                       | --      
|Net loss (Note F)                              | $(1,599)                 | $(1,044)
|                                               |                          |         
|Net loss allocated to general partner (1%)     | $   (16)                 | $   (10)
|Net loss allocated to limited partners (99%)   | (1,583)                  | (1,034) 
|                                               |                          |         
|                                               | $(1,599)                 | $(1,044)
|                                               |                          |         
|Net loss per limited partnership unit          | $(1.74)                  | $(1.14) 





See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements











CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL

(in thousands, except unit data)





|                                  |             |          |          |         
|--------------------------------- | ----------- | -------- | -------- | --------
|                                  | Limited     |          |          |         
|                                  | Partnership | General  | Limited  |         
|                                  | Units       | Partner  | Partners | Total   
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Original capital contributions    | 912,182     | $1       | $228,046 | $228,047
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Partners' (deficiency) capital at |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2005                 | 909,079     | $  (394) | $ 13,302 | $ 12,908
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Abandonment of units (Note A)     | (25.7)      | --       | --       | --      
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Net loss for the year ended       |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2006                 | --          | (10)     | (1,034)  | (1,044) 
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Partners' (deficiency) capital at |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2006                 | 909,053.3   | (404)    | 12,268   | 11,864  
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Abandonment of units (Note A)     | (23.1)      | --       | --       | --      
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Net loss for the year ended       |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2007                 | --          | (16)     | (1,583)  | (1,599) 
|                                  |             |          |          |         
|Partners' (deficiency) capital at |             |          |          |         
|December 31, 2007                 | 909,030.2   | $(420)   | $10,685  | $10,265 





See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements











CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)



|                                                          |                          |         
|--------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------
|                                                          | Years Ended December 31,
|                                                          |                         
|                                                          | 2007                     | 2006    
|                                                          |                          |         
|Cash flows from operating activities:                     |                          |         
|Net loss                                                  | $(1,599)                 | $(1,044)
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in)   |                          |         
|provided by operating activities:                         |                          |         
|Depreciation                                              | 2,587                    | 2,536   
|Amortization of mortgage premiums                         | (97)                     | (103)   
|Amortization of loan costs                                | 35                       | 29      
|Casualty loss                                             | 5                        | --      
|Loss on early extinguishment of debt                      | 18                       | --      
|Distributions in excess of investment                     | (98)                     | --      
|Equity in loss from investments                           | 5                        | --      
|Change in accounts:                                       |                          |         
|Other assets                                              | 18                       | (46)    
|Receivables and deposits                                  | (55)                     | (28)    
|Accounts payable                                          | 104                      | 23      
|Accrued property taxes                                    | 4                        | (12)    
|Due to affiliates                                         | (1,196)                  | (46)    
|Tenant security deposit liabilities                       | 32                       | 8       
|Other liabilities                                         | 88                       | (9)     
|Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities       | (149)                    | 1,308   
|                                                          |                          |         
|Cash flows from investing activities:                     |                          |         
|Property improvements and replacements                    | (1,157)                  | (754)   
|Insurance proceeds received                               | 37                       | --      
|Distributions from affiliated partnership                 | 106                      | --      
|Net deposits to restricted escrow                         | (1)                      | --      
|Net cash used in investing activities                     | (1,015)                  | (754)   
|                                                          |                          |         
|Cash flows from financing activities:                     |                          |         
|Principal payments on mortgage notes payable              | (979)                    | (952)   
|Repayment of mortgage note payable                        | (5,482)                  | --      
|Proceeds from mortgage note payable                       | 11,175                   | --      
|Prepayment penalty                                        | (151)                    | --      
|Loan costs paid                                           | (213)                    | --      
|Advances from affiliate                                   | 421                      | 353     
|Repayment of advances from affiliate                      | (3,627)                  | --      
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities       | 1,144                    | (599)   
|                                                          |                          |         
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                 | (20)                     | (45)    
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year            | 474                      | 519     
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                  | $454                     | $474    
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:         |                          |         
|Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest       | $2,757                   | $2,476  
|Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:             |                          |         
|Property improvements and replacements included in        |                          |         
|accounts payable                                          | $43                      | $11     
|                                                          |                          |         
|Adjustment to due to affiliates  change in reimbursement |                          |         
|of accountable administrative expense                     | $--                      | $(359)  



Included in property improvements and replacements for the year ended December 31, 2006 are approximately $12,000 of improvements which were included in accounts payable at December 31, 2005.



See Accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements











CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



DECEMBER 31, 2007





Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Organization: Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2 (the "Partnership" or "Registrant"), a California Limited Partnership, was formed on April 12, 1983. Upon the Partnership's formation in 1983, Consolidated Capital Equities Corporation, (CCEC), a Colorado corporation, was the corporate general partner.  In December 1988, CCEC filed for reorganization under Chapter 11.  In 1990, as part of CCEC's reorganization plan, ConCap Equities, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "General Partner" or "CEI") acquired CCEC's general partner interests in the Partnership and in 15 other affiliated public limited partnerships and replaced CCEC as managing general partner in all 16 partnerships.  The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2013 unless terminated prior to such date. The Partnership commenced operations on July 22, 1983.



Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. Cash balances included approximately $339,000 at December 31, 2007 that are maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.



Restricted Escrow:  Approximately $79,000 of replacement reserves is on deposit with the mortgage holder of Canyon Crest Apartments, as required by the mortgage agreement.



Income Taxes: No provision has been made in the financial statements for Federal income taxes because, under current law, no Federal income taxes are paid directly by the Partnership.  The Unit holders are responsible for their respective shares of Partnership net income or loss. The Partnership reports certain transactions differently for tax than for financial statement purposes.



Partners' (Deficiency) Capital: The Partnership Agreement provides for net income and net losses for both financial and tax reporting purposes to be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partner. "Distributable Cash from Operations", as defined in the Partnership Agreement, is to be allocated 99% to the Limited Partners and 1% to the General Partner.  Distributions of surplus funds are to be allocated 100% to the Limited Partners.



Abandoned Units: During 2007 and 2006, the number of limited partnership units (the Units) decreased by 23.1 and 25.7 Units, respectively, due to limited partners abandoning their Units.  In abandoning his or her Units, a limited partner relinquishes all right, title and interest in the Partnership as of the date of the abandonment.



Net Loss Per Limited Partnership Unit: Net loss per Unit is computed by dividing net loss allocated to the Limited Partners by the number of Units outstanding at the beginning of the fiscal year. Per Unit information has been computed based on 909,053.3 and 909,079 Units outstanding for 2007 and 2006, respectively.



Depreciation: Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the investment properties and related personal property.  For Federal income tax purposes, the modified accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of (1) real property over 271⁄2 years and (2) personal property additions over 5 years.



Investment properties: Investment properties consist of four apartment complexes and are stated at fair market value at the time of the foreclosure.  The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components.  Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Costs, and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties.  Costs incurred in connection with capital projects are capitalized where the costs of the project exceed $250.  Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership capitalized approximately $15,000 of interest, approximately $5,000 of real estate taxes, and approximately $2,000 of operating costs. The Partnership did not capitalize any costs related to interest, property taxes, or operating costs during the year ended December 31, 2006.  Capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the asset.  Expenditures for ordinary repairs, maintenance and apartment turnover costs are expensed as incurred.



In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.  No adjustments for impairment of value were necessary for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006.



Tenant Security Deposits: The Partnership requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease and such deposits are included in receivables and deposits.  The security deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the space and is current on rental payments.



Leases:  The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.



Advertising Costs: The Partnership expenses the costs of advertising as incurred. Advertising costs of approximately $209,000 and $175,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were charged to expense as incurred and are included in operating expenses.



Deferred Costs: Loan costs of approximately $506,000, less accumulated amortization of approximately $121,000, are included in other assets. The loan costs are amortized over the terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization expense was approximately $35,000 and $29,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is included in interest expense.  Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $50,000 for each of the years 2008 through 2012.



Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related leases.  Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.













Fair Value of Financial Instruments: SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", as amended by SFAS No. 119, "Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.  Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments approximate their fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its long-term debt by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term long-term debt. The fair value of the Partnership's long term debt approximates its carrying value.



Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. SFAS No. 131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in SFAS No. 131, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements:  In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entitys own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.  The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applicable to recurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for the Partnership is generally limited to annual disclosures required by SFAS No. 107.  The Partnership is in the process of implementing SFAS No. 157; however, it has not completed its evaluation and thus has not yet determined the effect that SFAS No. 157 will have on the Partnerships financial statements.



In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and at that time did not elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments or other items within the scope of SFAS No. 159.



In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48").  FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The first step involves evaluation of a tax position to determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position.  The second step involves measuring the benefit to recognize in the financial statements for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold.  FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The Partnership adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.



In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA) issued Statement of Position No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies ("SOP 07-1").  SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies are required to be applied to an entity by clarifying the definition of an investment company and, whether investment company accounting should be retained by a parent company upon consolidation of an investment company subsidiary, or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting to an investment company investee. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SOP 07-1-1 that indefinitely defers the effective date of SOP 07-1.



Note B  Mortgage Notes Payable



The principal terms of mortgage notes payable are as follows:



|                        |                |           |          |                |          
|----------------------- | -------------- | --------- | -------- | -------------- | ---------
|                        | Principal      | Monthly   |          |                | Principal
|                        | Balance At     | Payment   | Stated   |                | Balance  
|                        | December 31,   | Including | Interest | Maturity       | Due at   
|                        | 2007           | Interest  | Rate     | Date           | Maturity 
|                        | (in thousands) |           |          | (in thousands)
|Properties              |                |           |          |                |          
|Canyon Crest Apartments | $ 2,903        | $   28    | 7.10%    | 01/01/10       | $ 2,613  
|Highcrest Townhomes     | 11,153         | 68        | 6.17%    | 10/01/17       | 9,414    
|Windemere Apartments    | 4,883          | 50        | 7.83%    | 11/01/10       | 4,189    
|Glenbridge Manor        |                |           |          |                |          
|Apartments              | 19,749         | 131       | 5.65%    | 12/15/13       | 16,566   
|                        | 38,688         |           |          |                |          
|Mortgage premiums, net  | 177            |           |          |                |          
|Total                   | $38,865        | $277      |          |                | $32,782  



On September 28, 2007, the Partnership refinanced the mortgage debt encumbering Highcrest Townhomes. The refinancing replaced the existing mortgage debt, which at the time of refinancing had a principal balance of approximately $5,482,000, with a new mortgage loan in the principal amount of $11,175,000.  The new mortgage loan bears interest at 6.17% per annum and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $68,000 beginning on November 1, 2007 through the October 1, 2017 maturity date, with a balloon payment of approximately $9,414,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to October 1, 2018.  Total capitalized loan costs associated with the new mortgage were approximately $213,000 and are included in other assets. The Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $18,000, which is included in interest expense on the accompanying statements of operations, as a result of a prepayment penalty paid, partially offset by the write off of the unamortized mortgage premium. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, to guarantee the obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing.



The mortgage notes payable are fixed rate mortgages that are nonrecourse and are secured by a pledge of the Partnerships investment properties and by pledge of revenues from the respective investment properties. The mortgage notes impose prepayment penalties if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the properties may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.



The mortgage premiums of approximately $177,000 are net of accumulated amortization of approximately $265,000. The mortgage premiums are being amortized over the remaining lives of the loans. Amortization of the mortgage premiums are included in interest expense in the statements of operations.



Scheduled principal payments of the mortgage notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):



|           |          |          |        
|---------- | -------- | -------- | -------
|           | Mortgage |          |        
|           | Notes    | Premiums | Total  
|           |          |          |        
|2008       | $   968  | $  62    | $ 1,030
|2009       | 1,032    | 67       | 1,099  
|2010       | 7,696    | 48       | 7,744  
|2011       | 714      | --       | 714    
|2012       | 756      | --       | 756    
|Thereafter | 27,522   | --       | 27,522 
|           | $38,688  | $177     | $38,865



Note C - Transactions with Affiliated Parties



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $445,000 and $424,000, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which are included in operating expenses.



The Partnerships policy is to record management reimbursements to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement on a quarterly basis, using estimated financial information furnished by an affiliate of the General Partner.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership was charged management reimbursements of approximately $610,000.  During the fourth quarter of 2006, the General Partner determined that it had overcharged the Partnership for management reimbursements in 2005 by approximately $359,000.  Accordingly, the General Partner reduced the outstanding accrued management reimbursements by $359,000 during the fourth quarter of 2006, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.



An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $525,000 and $42,000, which is net of the reduction as discussed above, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $75,000 and $43,000, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the Partnership owed approximately $410,000 for accountable administrative expenses, which is included in due to affiliates.



Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $421,000 and $353,000 during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to fund costs associated with the refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes and operations at the properties. Interest is charged at the prime rate plus 2% (9.25% at December 31, 2007). Interest expense was approximately $199,000 and $231,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership repaid approximately $4,192,000 of advances and accrued interest. There were no outstanding advances or associated accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. at December 31, 2007. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Subsequent to December 31, 2007, AIMCO Properties, L.P. advanced the Partnership approximately $196,000 to fund operations at Highcrest Townhomes and Glenbridge Manor Apartments.



In connection with the September 2007 refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes, the Partnership paid the General Partner a fee of approximately $112,000 pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. This fee was capitalized, is included in other assets on the balance sheet and is being amortized over the life of the loan.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $225,000 and $210,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 573,182.05 Units in the Partnership representing 63.05% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, Unit holders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 63.05% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.













Note D  Investment Properties and Accumulated Depreciation



|                            |              |                |             |              
|--------------------------- | ------------ | -------------- | ----------- | -------------
|                            |              | Initial Cost   |            
|                            |              | To Partnership |            
|                            |              | (in thousands) |            
|                            |              |                | Buildings   | Net Cost     
|                            |              |                | and Related | Capitalized  
|                            |              |                | Personal    | Subsequent to
|Description                 | Encumbrances | Land           | Property    | Acquisition  
|                            |              |                |             |              
|                            |              |                |             |              
|Canyon Crest Apartments     | $ 2,903      | $ 1,242        | $ 4,158     | $ 1,126      
|Highcrest Townhomes         | 11,153       | 3,660          | 8,540       | 1,067        
|Windemere Apartments        | 4,883        | 1,955          | 7,445       | 980          
|Glenbridge Manor Apartments | 19,749       | 4,335          | 24,269      | 2,386        
|                            |              |                |             |              
|                            | 38,688       |                |             |              
|Mortgage Premiums           | 177          |                |             |              
|                            |              |                |             |              
|Totals                      | $38,865      | $11,192        | $44,412     | $5,559       



|                     |                               |             |         |              |              |          |            
|-------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------- | ------- | ------------ | ------------ | -------- | -----------
|                     | Gross Amount At Which Carried |             |         |              |             
|                     | At December 31, 2007          |             |         |              |             
|                     | (in thousands)                |             |         |              |             
|                     |                               |             |         |              |              |          |            
|                     |                               | Buildings   |         |              |              |          |            
|                     |                               | And Related |         |              |              |          |            
|                     |                               | Personal    |         | Accumulated  | Date of      | Date     | Depreciable
|Description          | Land                          | Properties  | Total   | Depreciation | Construction | Acquired | Life       
|                     |                               |             |         |              |              |          |            
|Canyon Crest Apts    | $ 1,242                       | $ 5,284     | $ 6,526 | $ 1,229      | 1966         | 08/22/02 | 5-30 yrs   
|Highcrest Townhomes  | 3,660                         | 9,607       | 13,267  | 3,318        | 1968         | 08/22/02 | 5-30 yrs   
|Windemere Apartments | 1,955                         | 8,425       | 10,380  | 1,892        | 1982         | 08/28/02 | 5-30 yrs   
|Glenbridge Manor     |                               |             |         |              |              |          |            
|Apartments           | 4,297                         | 26,693      | 30,990  | 5,101        | 2003         | 09/01/03 | 5-30 yrs   
|                     |                               |             |         |              |              |          |            
|Totals               | $11,154                       | $50,009     | $61,163 | $11,540      |              |          |            



Reconciliation of "Investment Properties and Accumulated Depreciation":



|                             |                          |        
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | -------
|                             | Years Ended December 31,
|                             | 2007                     | 2006   
|                             | (in thousands)          
|Investment Properties        |                          |        
|Balance at beginning of year | $60,033                  | $59,280
|Property improvements        | 1,189                    | 753    
|Disposition of assets        | (59)                     | --     
|Balance at end of year       | $61,163                  | $60,033
|                             |                          |        
|Accumulated Depreciation     |                          |        
|Balance at beginning of year | $ 8,961                  | $ 6,425
|Additions charged to expense | 2,587                    | 2,536  
|Disposition of assets        | (8)                      | --     
|Balance at end of year       | $11,540                  | $8,961 



The aggregate cost of the investment properties for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is approximately $61,176,000 and $60,034,000, respectively. The accumulated depreciation taken for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is approximately $12,005,000 and $9,411,000, respectively.



Note E - Investment in Affiliated Partnerships



The Partnership has investments in the following affiliated partnerships:



|                     |                   |            |                  
|-------------------- | ----------------- | ---------- | -----------------
|                     |                   |            | Investment       
|                     |                   | Ownership  | Balance At       
|Partnership          | Type of Ownership | Percentage | December 31, 2007
|                     |                   |            | (in thousands)   
|Consolidated Capital | Special Limited   |            |                  
|Growth Fund          | Partner           | 0.40%      | $   --           
|Consolidated Capital | Special Limited   |            |                  
|Properties III       | Partner           | 1.86%      | 17               
|Consolidated Capital | Special Limited   |            |                  
|Properties IV        | Partner           | 1.86%      | 610              
|                     |                   |            | $627             



These investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Distributions from the affiliated partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying statements of operations.  During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership received approximately $106,000 of distributions from refinancing proceeds of one of its affiliated partnerships, Consolidated Capital Growth Fund, approximately $98,000 of which was recognized as income on the accompanying statements of operations. No such distributions were received during the year ended December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership recognized approximately $5,000 in equity in loss from investments related to its allocated share of the loss from two of the affiliated partnerships. The Partnership did not recognize any equity in income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



Note F - Income Taxes



The Partnership is classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes.  Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is made in the financial statements of the Partnership. Taxable income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax returns of its partners.



The following is a reconciliation of reported net loss and Federal taxable loss for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per unit data):



|                                 |          |         
|-------------------------------- | -------- | --------
|                                 | 2007     | 2006    
|                                 |          |         
|Net loss as reported             | $(1,599) | $(1,044)
|(Deduct) Add:                    |          |         
|Depreciation differences         | (7)      | 93      
|Change in prepaid rental         | 49       | (12)    
|Casualty gain                    | 4        | --      
|Other                            | 116      | 68      
|                                 |          |         
|Federal taxable loss             | $(1,437) | $(895)  
|                                 |          |         
|Federal taxable loss per limited |          |         
|partnership unit                 | $(1.56)  | $(0.97) 













The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net assets (in thousands):



|                         |        
|------------------------ | -------
|Net assets as reported   | $10,265
|Building and land        | 13     
|Accumulated depreciation | (465)  
|Syndication fees         | 25,796 
|Other                    | 2,578  
|Net assets - tax basis   | $38,187



Note G - Casualty Events



In February 2007, Glenbridge Manor Apartments experienced damages of approximately $35,000 as a result of frozen pipes.  During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $3,000, which is included in operating expenses, as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $25,000, net of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $28,000.



In October 2007, Canyon Crest Apartments experienced damages of approximately $31,000 as a result of a kitchen fire. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership recognized a casualty loss of approximately $2,000, which is included in operating expenses, as a result of the expected receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $21,000, approximately $12,000 of which was received during the year ended December 31, 2007, net of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $23,000.



Note H - Contingencies



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group(the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint. Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review. The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.



On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.  On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.



On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders.  The Matter was argued and submitted and the Court of Appeal issued an opinion on February 20, 2008 affirming the order approving the settlement and judgment entered thereto.  On March 12, 2008, the Court of Appeal denied Appellants Petition for Re-Hearing. Appellant has until April 1, 2008 to file a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court.



The General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.



The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



Environmental



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership and operation of its properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Mold



The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships financial condition or results of operations.













Item 8.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures



None.



Item 8a.

Controls and Procedures



(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures



The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



The Partnerships management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officers of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by the Partnerships management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:



·

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets;



·

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Partnerships management; and



·

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



The Partnerships management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.  In making this assessment, the Partnerships management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.



Based on their assessment, the Partnerships management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting is effective.















This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnerships registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Managements report was not subject to the attestation by the Partnerships registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only managements report in this annual report.



(b)

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.



There have been no significant changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.



Item 8b.

Other Information



On March 27, 2008, AIMCO announced that Scott W. Fordham, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of AIMCO and the General Partner, has announced his resignation. Mr. Fordham has chosen to leave AIMCO to return to Texas to pursue an opportunity as chief accounting officer with an office REIT led by Tom August, the former CEO of Prentiss Properties Trust ("Prentiss"), with whom Mr. Fordham served as senior vice president and chief accounting officer prior to Prentisss 2006 merger with Brandywine Realty Trust.

Mr. Fordham will remain with AIMCO through the first quarter close in order to ensure an orderly transition.













PART III



Item 9.

Directors, Officers, Promoters and Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act



The Registrant has no directors or officers. The General Partner is ConCap Equities, Inc. (CEI). The names and ages of, as well as the position and offices held by the present directors and officers of the General Partner are set forth below. There are no family relationships between or among any directors or officers.



|                  |     |                                               
|----------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------
|Name              | Age | Position                                      
|                  |     |                                               
|Martha L. Long    | 48  | Director and Senior Vice President            
|Harry G. Alcock   | 45  | Director and Executive Vice President         
|Timothy Beaudin   | 49  | Executive Vice President and Chief Development
|                  |     | Officer                                       
|Lisa R. Cohn      | 39  | Executive Vice President, General Counsel     
|                  |     | and Secretary                                 
|Patti K. Fielding | 44  | Executive Vice President  Securities and     
|                  |     | Debt; Treasurer                               
|Thomas M. Herzog  | 45  | Executive Vice President and Chief            
|                  |     | Financial Officer                             
|Scott W. Fordham  | 40  | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting    
|                  |     | Officer                                       
|Stephen B. Waters | 46  | Vice President                                



Martha L. Long has been a Director and Senior Vice President of the General Partner since February 2004.  Ms. Long has been with AIMCO since October 1998 and has served in various capacities.  From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President and Controller of AIMCO and the General Partner.  During 2002 and 2003, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President of Continuous Improvement for AIMCO.



Harry G. Alcock was appointed as a Director of the General Partner in October 2004 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the General Partner in February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President of AIMCO since October 1999.  Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of AIMCO since July 1994, serving as Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999.  Mr. Alcock focuses on transactions related to AIMCOs portfolio of properties in the Western portion of the United States.



Timothy Beaudin was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of the General Partner and AIMCO in October 2005.  Prior to this time, beginning in 1995, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate investment trust.  During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served as Executive Vice President, with management responsibility for development, construction and asset management.



Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the General Partner and AIMCO in December 2007.  From January 2004 to December 2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of AIMCO.  Ms. Cohn joined AIMCO in July 2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel.  Prior to joining AIMCO, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan and Hartson LLP.



Patti K. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President - Securities and Debt of the General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in February 2003.  Ms. Fielding was appointed Treasurer of AIMCO and the General Partner in January 2005.  She is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department.  Ms. Fielding previously served as Senior Vice President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from January 2000 to February 2003.  Ms. Fielding joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a Vice President.



Thomas M. Herzog was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner and AIMCO in November 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the General Partner and AIMCO in July 2005.  In January 2004, Mr. Herzog joined AIMCO as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and of the General Partner in February 2004.  Prior to joining AIMCO in January 2004, Mr. Herzog was at GE Real Estate, serving as Chief Accounting Officer & Global Controller from April 2002 to January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002.  Prior to joining GE Real Estate, Mr. Herzog was at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990 to 2000.



Scott W. Fordham was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in January 2007 of the General Partner and AIMCO. Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Fordham served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust from January 2006 through December 2006. Prior to the merger of Prentiss Properties Trust with Brandywine Realty Trust, Mr. Fordham served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Prentiss Properties Trust and was in charge of the corporate accounting and financial reporting groups. Prior to joining Prentiss Properties Trust in 1992, Mr. Fordham worked in public accounting with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.



Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice President of the General Partner and AIMCO in April 2004.  Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since joining AIMCO in September 1999.  Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as the principal financial officer of the General Partner.



One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.



The board of directors of the General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Martha L. Long meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".



The directors and officers of the General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCO's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.



AIMCO Properties, L.P., did not timely file a Form 4 disclosing the acquisition of limited partnership units on October 17, 2006 (995.1 units), September 13, 2007 (431.7 units), October 18, 2007 (85.6 units), November 15, 2007 (16 units) and December 17, 2007 (14 units).  These purchases were disclosed on a Form 5 filed February 14, 2008.



Item 10.

Executive Compensation



None of the directors and officers of the General Partner received any remuneration from the Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2007.













Item 11.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



Except as noted below, no person was known by the Partnership to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Limited Partnership Units (the Units) of the Partnership as of December 31, 2007:



|                             |                 |           
|---------------------------- | --------------- | ----------
|Entity                       | Number of Units | Percentage
|Reedy River Properties       |                 |           
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 168,736.50      | 18.56%    
|AIMCO IPLP, L.P.             |                 |           
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 17,240.60       | 1.90%     
|AIMCO Properties, L.P.       |                 |           
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 319,686.25      | 35.16%    
|Cooper River Properties, LLC |                 |           
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 67,518.70       | 7.43%     



Reedy River Properties, AIMCO IPLP, L.P. and Cooper River Properties, LLC are indirectly ultimately owned by AIMCO. Its business address is 55 Beattie Place, Greenville, SC 29602.



AIMCO Properties, L.P. is indirectly ultimately controlled by AIMCO. Its business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.



No directors or officers of the General Partner owns any Units of the Partnership of record or beneficially.



Item 12.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $445,000 and $424,000, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which are included in operating expenses on the statements of operations included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



The Partnerships policy is to record management reimbursements to the General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement on a quarterly basis, using estimated financial information furnished by an affiliate of the General Partner.  For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Partnership was charged management reimbursements of approximately $610,000.  During the fourth quarter of 2006, the General Partner determined that it had overcharged the Partnership for management reimbursements in 2005 by approximately $359,000.  Accordingly, the General Partner reduced the outstanding accrued management reimbursements by $359,000 during the fourth quarter of 2006, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006.



An affiliate of the General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $525,000 and $42,000, which is net of the reduction as discussed above, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses and investment properties on the financial statements included in Item 7. Financial Statements. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $75,000 and $43,000, respectively. At December 31, 2007, the Partnership owed approximately $410,000 for accountable administrative expenses, which is included in due to affiliates on the balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the General Partner, advanced the Partnership approximately $421,000 and $353,000 during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to fund costs associated with the refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes and operations at the properties. Interest is charged at the prime rate plus 2% (9.25% at December 31, 2007). Interest expense was approximately $199,000 and $231,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership repaid approximately $4,192,000 of advances and accrued interest. There were no outstanding advances or associated accrued interest due to AIMCO Properties, L.P. at December 31, 2007. The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Subsequent to December 31, 2007, AIMCO Properties, L.P. advanced the Partnership approximately $196,000 to fund operations at Highcrest Townhomes and Glenbridge Manor Apartments.



In connection with the September 2007 refinancing of the mortgage encumbering Highcrest Townhomes, the Partnership paid the General Partner a fee of approximately $112,000 pursuant to the Partnership Agreement. This fee was capitalized, is included in other assets on the balance sheet and is being amortized over the life of the loan.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $225,000 and $210,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interest in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 573,182.05 Units in the Partnership representing 63.05% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers.  Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 63.05% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Neither of the General Partner's directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the General Partner.



Item 13.

Exhibits



See Exhibit Index.















Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services



The General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Partnership for 2008.  The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2007 and 2006 are described below.



Audit Fees.  Fees for audit services totaled approximately $58,000 and $55,000 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnerships Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB.



Tax Fees.  Fees for tax services totaled approximately $18,000 and $19,000 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.













SIGNATURES







In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2
| |                                                
| | By:   ConCap Equities, Inc.                    
| | General Partner                                
| |                                                
| | By:   /s/Martha L. Long                        
| | Martha L. Long                                 
| | Senior Vice President                          
| |                                                
| | By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters                     
| | Stephen B. Waters                              
| | Vice President                                 
| |                                                
| | Date: March 28, 2008                           



In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and the in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                     |                        |                     
|-------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------
|/s/Harry G. Alcock   | Director and Executive | Date: March 28, 2008
|Harry G. Alcock      | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Martha L. Long    | Director and Senior    | Date: March 28, 2008
|Martha L. Long       | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Stephen B. Waters | Vice President         | Date: March 28, 2008
|Stephen B. Waters    |                        |                     













CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES/2



EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit

Description of Exhibit



3.1

Certificates of Limited Partnership, as amended to date.



3.2

Fourth Amendment to the amended and restated limited partnership agreement of CCIP/2 dated January 8, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).



10.30

Multifamily Note dated October 2, 2000 between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two L.P., a California limited partnership, and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation for refinance of Windemere Apartments (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 17, 2000).



10.32

Multifamily Note dated December 22, 2000 between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two L.P., a California limited partnership, and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation for refinance of Canyon Crest Apartments (Incorporated by reference to  the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2001).



10.33

Assignment of Partnership Rights and Distributions between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two, L.P., a California limited partnership and Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, a California limited partnership (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2002).



10.34

Agreement for Conveyance of Real Property, including exhibits thereto, between Consolidated Capital Equity Partners/Two, L.P., a California limited partnership and Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties/2, a California limited partnership (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22, 2002).



10.35

Promissory Note dated December 17, 2003 between CCIP/2 Village Brook, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership, and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2003).



10.36

Mortgage and Security Agreement dated December 17, 2003 between CCIP/2 Village Brook, LLC, a Delaware limited partnership, and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 19, 2003).



10.37

Multifamily Note, dated September 28, 2007 between CCIP/2 Highcrest L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and Capmark Bank, a Utah industrial bank. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007).



10.38

Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Security Agreement, dated September 28, 2007 between CCIP/2 Highcrest, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and Capmark Bank, a Utah
industrial bank. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007).



31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.