alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: April 19, 2013

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

____________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01761-RPM

CARLOS BASSATT, Richard C. LaFond

Adrienne M. Tranel

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and

PATRICK SANCHEZ, Michael B. Case

Holly E. Ortiz

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

____________________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motions for Summary Judgment

9:58 a.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks.

Mr. LaFond informs the Court of the current status of the CCRD action (February 19, 2013 Colorado 

Court of Appeals dismissed action and awaiting a third final order from CCRD).

Argument by Mr. LaFond.

Court states res judicata will not be applied and its reasons are as stated on record.

Argument by Ms. Ortiz.

Ms. Ortiz tenders to Court a copy of the second order entered by the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Counsel may file a supplemental brief (compensatory damages - law of survivorship).

Court further states collateral estoppel will not be applied.

Further Argument by Mr. Lafond.

ORDERED: Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is denied as stated on record.

Case 1:11-cv-01761-RPM-BNB Document 75 Filed 04/19/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

April 19, 2013

11-cv-01761-RPM

ORDERED: Defendants’ supplemental brief due April 22, 2013 and plaintiff’s response due May

13, 2013.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [54], is under advisement upon filing

of supplemental briefs.

Request for Reconsideration (re [50]) of Plaintiff’s [35] Motion for Partial

Summary Judgment [60], is denied.

10:31 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 33 min.

Case 1:11-cv-01761-RPM-BNB Document 75 Filed 04/19/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David C. Peterschmidt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Inktomi Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Intkomi Corporation.


Dated: February 14, 2003                By: /s/ DAVID C. PETERSCHMIDT
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            David C. Peterschmidt
#### BARINEAU v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 99
                                                                    ----------


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amscan Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gerald C.
Rittenberg, Chief Executive Officer and Michael A. Correale, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                              /s/ Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Gerald C. Rittenberg
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                              /s/ Michael A. Correale
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Michael A. Correale
                                             Chief Financial Officer


May 15, 2003
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Q3... 1.25 .08 .08 .84 .12 .13 .49 .36 .28 .11  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Radyne ComStream Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Radyne ComStream Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23159) filed as of March 12,
1997, Form S-8 (File No. 333-67469) filed as of November 19, 1998 and amended as
of May 5, 1999, Form S-8 (File No. 333-90383) filed as of November 5, 1999 and
Form S-8 (file No. 333-41704) filed as of July 19, 2000, of our report dated
February 21, 2002, on the consolidated balance sheets of Radyne ComStream Inc.
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December
31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Radyne ComStream Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 29, 2002
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0310 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Samuel Huffines,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until August 23 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0310 

# FILED

Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA 07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0310

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Chad M. Wright, 

### hereby certify that I have served true and accurate copies of the foregoing Motion - Unopposed to the following on 07-17-2023 

### : Audrey S. Cromwell (Govt Attorney) 1709 W. College St. Ste 200 Bozeman MT 59715 Representing: State of Montana Service Method: eService Austin Miles Knudsen (Govt Attorney) 215 N. Sanders Helena MT 59620 Representing: State of Montana Service Method: eService

Electronically signed by Stefanie Moore on behalf of Chad M. Wright Dated: 07-17-2023

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court July 17 2023
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Healthcare Technology, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period from January 27, 2005 (Inception) through
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

                                              /s/ Samuel P. Plunkett
                                              -------------------------
                                              Samuel P. Plunkett
                                              CEO, CFO
                                              Dated: April 12, 2007
Second Department,

July, 2002

(July 1, 2002)

#### Wayne Arnold et al., Appellants, v Neil Siegel et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d 431]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated September 21, 2001, as denied their motion, inter alia, for leave to serve a third amended complaint to add a claim for punitive damages, to disqualify counsel for the defendant Nyack Hospital, to preclude the defendant Nyack Hospital from introducing any evidence at trial as to its affir*364mative defenses, and to compel discovery, and (2) an order of the same court, dated October 17, 2001, as denied their motion to disqualify counsel for the defendants Neil Siegel, Rockland Podiatry, P.C., and Steven Adler. .

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated September 21, 2001, as denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to disqualify counsel for the defendant Nyack Hospital is dismissed, since the plaintiffs are not aggrieved thereby, as they withdrew that branch of the motion before the issuance of the order; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated September 21, 2001, is affirmed insofar as appealed from and reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 17, 2001, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for leave to serve a third amended complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. The record is devoid of any evidence of willful or wanton negligence or recklessness on the part of the defendants which would warrant súch a claim *(see Tatzel v Kaplan,*292 AD2d 440; *Lee v Health Force,*268 AD2d 564; *Rey v Park View Nursing Home,*262 AD2d 624, 627).

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to preclude the defendant Nyack Hospital (hereinafter the Hospital) from introducing any evidence at trial as to its affirmative defenses. The Hospital’s affirmative defenses are statutory in nature and require no amplification in a further bill of particulars *(see Marsala v Weinraub,*208 AD2d 689, 690).

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is no basis to disqualify the counsel for the defendants Neil Siegel, Rockland Podiatry, P.C., and Steven Adler. Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which sought that relief *(cf. Tekni-Plex, Inc. v Meyner & Landis,*89 NY2d 123).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Krausman and Crane, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) The Boeing Company ) ) Under Contract No. F3460l-94-C-0005 et al. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59595

Andrew E. Shipley, Esq. Seth H. Locke, Esq.

Perkins Coie LLP Washington, DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Douglas R. Jacobson, Esq.

Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Bloomington, MN ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 9 January 2015

# ~~# Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59595, Appeal ofThe Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending September 4, 2021

----

Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Financial Statements for Holding Companies (FR Y-9 Reports).            -Approved, August 30, 2021            Reserve Bank Operations            Reserve Bank Director -- appointment of a Class C director for the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.            -Approved, September 1, 2021            Enforcement            Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., Turin, Italy, and Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., New York Branch, New York, New York -- written agreement dated March 2, 2007, terminated August 31, 2021.            -Announced, September 2, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, No. 333-41077, No. 333-65995, No. 333-78941, No. 333-74244, and No. 333-105153 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated August 12, 2004 (April 11, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note A.3), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement as discussed in Note A.3, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended May 29, 2004.

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
April 18, 2005
Case 1:11-sw-05439-MJW Document 14 Filed 01/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**MING WEI,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF** 
**HEALTH, PENNSYLVANIA STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, VERONICA**  **URDANETA, STEPHEN OSTROFF, AND**
**TIFFANY BURNHAUSER,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 402 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 18th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT A 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 37-1 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 37-1 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 37-1 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Administration on Children, Youth and Families; Supplemental 
Grant Awards

AGENCY: Family and Youth Services Bureau, ACYF, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice to award supplemental grants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA #: 93.592.
    Legislative Authority: Family Violence Prevention and Services Act 
(42 U.S.C. 10401 et seq.)
    Amount of Award: $145,000.
    Project Period: September 30, 2008-September 29, 2009.

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Administration on Children, 
Youth and Families, Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB), will award 
a program expansion supplement award to the Family Violence Prevention 
Fund (FVPF) in San Francisco, CA to continue the provision of technical 
support through the Family Violence Prevention and Services (FVPSA) 
Discretionary Grant Program. FVPF is a leading provider of training and 
technical assistance for service providers who seek to improve 
collaboration between domestic violence and child welfare programs. The 
supplemental award will enable FVPF to plan and implement State-level 
strategies to educate policy makers and to ensure that State Domestic 
Violence Coalitions are key stakeholders in the Child and Family 
Service Review process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Marylouise Kelley, Director, Family 
Violence Prevention and Services Program, 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: 202-401-5756. E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92fff3e0ebfefde7fbe1f7bcf9f7fefef7ebd2f3f1f4bcfafae1bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f222e3d3623203a263c2a61242a23232a360f2e2c296127273c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 29, 2008.
Joan E. Ohl,
Commissioner, Administration on Children, Youth and Families.
 [FR Doc. E8-23478 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### ERIE v. PRIMOS.

No. 19172.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 13, 1948.

*833J. L. Warren Woodville, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

George Sladovich, Jr., of New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee moves to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the judgment was signed after the appeal was applied for and granted. In support of the motion for dismissal counsel cites a number of authorities (and there are many others) holding that no appeal lies from an unsigned judgment, for in such case the judgment is inchoate and the appeal would be premature.

The judgment was rendered on November 12, 1948, and on November IS appellant moved for and obtained a suspensive appeal returnable to this court on November 25. The judgment, which is included in the transcript, was not signed until November 18.

In the cases cited by appellee, no signed judgment was contained in the record at the time of its lodgment in the appellate court. If an unsigned judgment* appeared in the instant record, we would be constrained to follow these cases and dismiss the appeal, for the absence of the signed judgment would be fatal to the appeal.

However, an appeal from a judgment which is not signed until after the appeal is taken, but which is signed before the transcript is returnable to the appellate court, and which actually appears in the transcript, is not subject to dismissal because of the appellant’s premature action in appealing from the unsigned judgment. The fact that the judgment was signed, plus the fact that it appears in the record before us as a final decree, has the effect of curing the prematurity of the application for and the order of appeal, and the most that can be said is that by applying for the appeal before the judgment was signed, appellant abandoned the right accorded him by law to apply for a new trial. See Mossier Acceptance Co. v. Moliere, La.App., 181 So. 228, and authorities therein cited.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Motion denied.
Case 1:11-sw-05439-MJW Document 12 Filed 11/17/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending December 15, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodPRESIDIO BANK                                                                                                           * BranchPresidio Bank, San Francisco, California, to establish a branch facility at 999 Fifth Avenue, Suite 300, San Rafael, California.Newspaper: 12/31/2007Federal Register: Not applicableSTATE BANCORP NORTHWEST                                                                                                 * 3A1State Bancorp Northwest to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of State Bank Northwest, both of Spokane Valley, Washington.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/20/2007WELLS FARGO & COMPANY                                                                                                   4c8Wells Fargo & Company, through a new subsidiary of WFC Holdings Corporation, both of San Francisco, California, request for approval to purchase and sell electricity in the spot market and take and make delivery of electricity to settle commodity derivatives.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not available