58112 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 

Determination. See Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Steel Wire Garment Hangers 

From the People’s Republic of China, 73 

FR 15726 (March 25, 2008) 

(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

Effective on the date of publication of 

the ITC’s final affirmative injury 

determination, CBP will require, at the 

same time as importers would normally 

deposit estimated duties on this 

merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the 

estimated weighted–average 

antidumping duty margins as listed 

below. See section 735(c)(3) of the Act. 

The ‘‘PRC–wide’’ rate applies to all 

exporters of subject merchandise not 

specifically listed. The weighted– 

average dumping margins are as follows: 

STEEL WIRE GARMENT HANGERS

FROM THE PRC – AMENDED DUMPING MARGINS

Exporter & Producer 

Weighted– 

Average 

Deposit 

Rate 

Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. 15.83 % 

Shaoxing Metal Companies:.

Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd. .................. 94.78 % 

Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd..

Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd..

Company ‘‘X’’.

Jiangyin Hongji Metal Products 

Co., Ltd ................................... 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Meideli Metal Hanger 

Co., Ltd. .................................. 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd. ........................ 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd. ..................... 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd. ................... 55.31 % 

Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd. ..................... 55.31 % 

Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger 

Co., Ltd. .................................. 55.31 % 

Pu Jiang County Command 

Metal Products Co., Ltd. ......... 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd. ........................ 55.31 % 

Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Ind. 

Co., Ltd. .................................. 55.31 % 

Jiaxing Boyi Medical Device Co., 

Ltd. .......................................... 55.31 % 

Yiwu Ao–Si Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. .......................................... 55.31 % 

Shaoxing Guochao Metallic 

Products Co., Ltd. ................... 55.31 % 

PRC–Wide Rate1 ........................ 187.25 % 

1The PRC-Wide entity includes Tianjin 

Hongtong Metal Manufacture Co. Ltd. 

This notice constitutes the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

steel wire garment hangers from the PRC 

pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. 

Interested parties may contact the 

Department’s Central Records Unit, 

Room 1117 of the main Commerce 

building, for copies of an updated list of 

antidumping duty orders currently in 

effect. 

This order is published in accordance 

with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 

CFR351.211. 

Dated: September 29, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–23569 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Environmental Technologies Trade 

Advisory Committee (ETTAC), Request 

for Nominations 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Trade Development. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental 

Technologies Trade Advisory 

Committee (ETTAC) was established 

pursuant to provisions under Title IV of 

the Jobs Through Trade Expansion Act, 

22. U.S.C. 2151, and under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 

2. ETTAC was first chartered on May 31, 

1994. ETTAC serves as an advisory body 

to the Environmental Trade Working 

Group of the Trade Promotion 

Coordinating Committee (TPCC), 

reporting directly to the Secretary of 

Commerce in his capacity as Chairman 

of the TPCC. ETTAC advises on the 

development and administration of 

policies and programs to expand United 

States exports of environmental 

technologies, goods, and services and 

products that comply with United States 

environmental, safety, and related 

requirements. 

Membership in a committee operating 

under the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act must be balanced in terms of 

economic subsector, geographic 

location, and company size. Committee 

members serve in a representative 

capacity, and must be able to generally 

represent the views and interests of a 

certain subsector of the U.S. 

environmental industry. We are seeking 

senior executive-level company or 

environmental technologies association 

candidates. Members of the ETTAC 

have experience in exporting the full 

range of environmental technologies 

products and services including: 

(1) Air Pollution Control/Monitoring 

Equipment. 

(2) Analytic Services. 

(3) Environmental Energy Sources. 

(4) Environmental Engineering and 

Consulting Services. 

(5) Financial Services. 

(6) Process and Prevention 

Technologies. 

(7) Solid and Hazardous Waste 

Equipment and Management. 

(8) Water and Wastewater Equipment 

and Services. 

The Secretary of Commerce invites 

nominations to ETTAC of U.S. citizens 

who will represent U.S. environmental 

goods and services companies that trade 

internationally, or trade associations 

whose members include U.S. companies 

that trade internationally. Companies 

must be at least 51 percent beneficiallyowned by U.S. persons. U.S.-based 

subsidiaries of foreign companies in 

general do not qualify for representation 

on the committee. 

Nominees will be considered based 

upon their ability to carry out the goals 

of ETTAC’s enabling legislation as 

further articulated in its charter. 

ETTAC’s Charter is available on the 

Internet at http:// 

www.environment.ita.doc.gov. Priority 

will be given to a balanced 

representation in terms of point of view 

represented by various sectors, product 

lines, firm sizes, and geographic areas. 

Appointments are made without 

regard to political affiliation. 

Nominees must be U.S. citizens, 

representing U.S. environmental goods 

and services firms that trade 

internationally or provide services in 

direct support of the international 

trading activities of other entities. 

Self-nominations are accepted. If you 

are interested in nominating someone to 

become a member of ETTAC, please 

provide the following information (2 

pages maximum): 

(1) Name. 

(2) Title. 

(3) Work Phone; Fax; and, E-mail 

Address. 

(4) Company or Trade Association 

Name and Address including Web site 

Address. 

(5) Short Bio of nominee including 

credentials and proof of U.S. 

citizenship, and a list of citizenships to 

countries other than the U.S. 

(6) Brief description of the company 

or trade association and its business 

activities; company size (number of 

employees and annual sales); and export 

markets served. 

Please, do not send company or trade 

association brochures or any other 

information. 

This information may be e-mailed to 

marc.lemmond@mail.doc.gov or faxed 

to the attention of Marc Lemmond at 

202–482–5665, and must be received 

before the deadline. Nominees selected 

to ETTAC will be notified. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices 58113 

Deadline: This request will be open 

until October 24, from the date of 

publication in the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marc Lemmond, Office of Energy & 

Environmental Industries, Room 4053, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; phone 202–482– 

3889; fax 202–482–5665; e-mail 

Marc.lemmond@mail.doc.gov. 

Dated: September 30, 2008. 

Rachel Halpern, 

Acting Director, Office of Energy and 

Environmental Industries. 

[FR Doc. E8–23525 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension 

of Time Limits for the Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 6, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4474. 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published an 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) on 

January 4, 2005. See Notice of Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

From the People’s Republic of China, 70 

FR 329 (January 4, 2005). On March 7, 

2008, the Department published in the 

Federal Register a notice of the 

initiation of the antidumping duty 

administrative review of WBF from the 

PRC and new shipper reviews for the 

period January 1, 2007 through 

December 31, 2007. See Notice of 

Initiation of Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 12387 

(March 7, 2008) and Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of New Shipper 

Reviews, 73 FR 12392 (March 7, 2008). 

On August 22, 2008, the Department 

aligned the deadlines and the time 

limits of the new shipper reviews of 

WBF with the 2007 administrative 

review of WBF. See Memorandum to the 

File ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Alignment of the 1/1/2007–12/31/2007 

Annual Administrative Review and the 

1/1/2007–12/31/2007 New Shipper 

Review,’’ dated August 22, 2008. The 

preliminary results of these reviews are 

currently due no later than October 2, 

2008. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue 

preliminary results within 245 days 

after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order. However, if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within this time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time period to 

a maximum of 365 days. Completion of 

the preliminary results of these reviews 

within the 245-day period is not 

practicable because the Department 

needs additional time to analyze 

information pertaining to the 

respondents’ sales practices, factors of 

production, and corporate relationships, 

and to issue and review responses to 

supplemental questionnaires. 

Because it is not practicable to 

complete these reviews within the time 

specified under the Act, we are fully 

extending the time period for issuing 

the preliminary results of review to 365 

days until January 30, 2009, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act. The final results continue to be 

due 120 days after the publication of the 

preliminary results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: September 29, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–23566 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–894] 

Certain Tissue Paper Products from 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Rescission, in Part, 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 4, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published the preliminary 

results of the second administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain tissue paper products (‘‘tissue 

paper’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). See Certain Tissue 

Paper Products from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 

18497 (April 4, 2008) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). We gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. Based on our 

analysis of the comments received, we 

have made changes to the surrogate 

value for labor for the final results. We 

find that Max Fortune Industrial 

Limited and Max Fortune (FETDE) 

Paper Products Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

Max Fortune), has not sold subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (‘‘POR’’), 

March 1, 2006, through February 28, 

2007. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 6, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

We published the preliminary results 

of the second administrative review on 

April 4, 2008, in the Federal Register. 

See Preliminary Results. On May 5, 

2008, Seaman Paper Company of 

Massachusetts (‘‘Petitioner’’) and Max 

Fortune filed their case briefs. On May 

12, 2008, Petitioner and Max Fortune 

filed rebuttal briefs. On June 30, 2008, 

the Department placed import entry 

packages obtained from U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) on the 

record of this administrative review. 

The Department did not receive any 

comments regarding the CBP entry 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES