alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending April 5, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF LANDISBURG, THE                                                                                                 * BranchThe Bank of Landisburg, Landisburg, PA, to establish a branch office located at the Intersection of Routes 34 and 849, Oliver Township, Perry County, PA, current address being 2780 Keystone Way, Newport, PA.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableKEARNY MHC                                                                                                              * SLHC AcquisitionKearny MHC and Kearny Financial Corporation, both of Kearny, NJ, to acquire 100 percent of Atlas Bank, Brooklyn, NY, and merge it with and into the applicants wholly owned subsidiary,  Kearny Federal Savings Bank, Kearny, NJ.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/23/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,638,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                   233,628
<INVENTORY>                                  3,216,759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,349,291
<PP&E>                                       6,502,568
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,102,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,969,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,360,336
<BONDS>                                      3,575,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,074
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,993,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,969,882
<SALES>                                      9,580,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,580,681
<CGS>                                        6,902,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,902,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,815,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (294,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (108,797)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (185,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (185,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0,05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0,05)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                             TBC CORPORATION


                        RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE
                         COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
                           SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

RESOLVED, that the Company shall credit to each deferred compensation account
which it maintains for the benefit of its executives and directors, in each
calendar quarter, daily interest on the amount then credited to such account
(including all previous credits to such account) computed at an annual rate
which is equal to the average yield for BBB Industrial Bonds, as published in
the Standard & Poor's Corporate and Government Bond Yield Index (or such similar
index as the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall select) for
the month last preceding the beginning of such calendar quarter.










                                  -140-
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 230 Crescent Ave., Chelsea, MA 02150, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a39382a74363b38322b1a3e3229743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f99a9b89d795989b9188b99d918ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 23, 2006. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, 202-344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-2302 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2192

To reduce temporarily the duty on hydroxylamine free base.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 2001

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on hydroxylamine free base.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON HYDROXYLAMINE

4 FREE BASE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.28.25 hydroxylamine

free base (CAS

No. 7803–49–8)

(provided for in

subheading

2825.10.00) ....... .6% No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.
2

•HR 2192 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Case No. 08-cr-103-01-SM

Luis Escribano-Cora

ORDER

Re: Document No. 29, Motion to Appoint Substitute Counsel

Ruling: Defendant’s letter notifying the court of his decision

to dismiss counsel is taken as a motion to appoint substitute

counsel, which motion is denied as unsupported. Defendant’s

letter asserts no grounds at all that might support appointing new

counsel, and, as the court previously noted, sentencing in this

case has been continued a number of times, it is now rescheduled,

and the court advised the parties that no further continuances

would be permitted in the absence of extraordinary circumstances.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: August 31, 2010

cc: All Counsel of Record

U.S. Probation 

U.S. Marshal 

Luis Escribano-Cora

Case 1:08-cr-00103-SM Document 30 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 35.1



World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB



I, Joseph A. Venezia,
do hereby certify that I am the Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation, and further certify
on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the Exchange Note Servicing
Supplement 2019-A to Closed-End Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Exchange Note Servicing Supplement”),
among AL Holding Corp., as Closed-End Collateral Agent, World Omni LT, as Titling Trust, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)            A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on Form
10-K and covered by the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note
Servicing Supplement) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance
under the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing
Supplement), has been made under my supervision.



(ii)            To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under
the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement and the Closed-End Servicing Agreement (as defined in the Exchange Note Servicing Supplement)
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 6, 2020.



| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP. |                                                   
| | -------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
| |                            |                                                   
| |                            |                                                   
| | By:                        | /s/ Joseph Venezia                                
| |                            | Name: Joseph VeneziaTitle: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc. for the periods covered by this periodic report.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                      
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael C. Pearce                
|                   |  | Michael C. Pearce                    
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                   |  |                                      
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                
|                   |  | Tracy S. Clifford                    
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7909

GEORGE W. BLACKWELL, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent; ROY COOPER,

North Carolina Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-316)

Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 9, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Blackwell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George W. Blackwell, Sr., a state prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Blackwell has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny Blackwell’s motion for a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Transition Report of Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/T for the period ending January 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Kingsbury, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of  operations of the Company.














Date: April 30, 2010








/s/ Thomas A. Kingsbury





Thomas A. Kingsbury


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

          SCHEDULE TO FORM OF HCRI WORKING CAPITAL ASSURANCE AGREEMENT
           PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                LESSOR           LESSOR'S        LESSEE            LOCATION       PRINCIPAL
                                 STATE OF                                         AMOUNT OF
                                 INCORPORATION                                    NOTE
                                                                                  
<S>              <C>             <C>             <C>               <C>            <C>
LEBANON,        Pennsylvania     Pennsylvania    Financial Care    Lebanon        $686,800
PENNSYLVANIA    BCC                              Investors of      County,        
                Properties,                      Lebanon, LLC      Pennsylvania   
                Inc.                                                              

LOYALSOCK,      Pennsylvania     Pennsylvania    Financial Care    Lycoming       $674,050
PENNSYLVANIA    BCC                              Investors of      County,        
                Properties,                      Loyalsock, LLC    Pennsylvania   
                Inc.                                                              

WESTERVILLE,    HCN BCC          Delaware        Financial Care    Franklin       $1,313,675
OHIO            Holdings, Inc.                   Investors of      County, Ohio   
                                                 Westerville,                     
                                                 LLC                                     

MORRISTOWN,     HCN BCC          Delaware        Financial Care    Hamblen        $692,000
TENNESSEE       Holdings, Inc.                   Investors of      County,        
                                                 Morristown, LLC   Tennessee      

OAK RIDGE,      HCN BCC          Delaware        Financial Care    Anderson       $697,948
TENNESSEE       Holdings, Inc.                   Investors of      County,        
                                                 Oak Ridge, LLC    Tennessee      

SAGAMORE        HCN BCC          Delaware        Financial Care    Summit         $1,243,550
HILLS, OHIO     Holdings, Inc.                   Investors of      County, Ohio   
                                                 Sagamore Hills,                                   
                                                 LLC
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW

JACK DANIEL’S PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BEVERAGE RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation,

JAKK’D HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and

JACK BARRECA, an individual,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Vacate the April 24, 2012,

Status Conference, DN 46, filed with the Court on April 20, 2012, is GRANTED. The 

Status Conference set on April 24, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., is VACATED. The parties shall

submit their Joint Motion and Proposed Final Judgment by Consent With Permanent

Injunction (as set forth in the motion), on or before April 25, 2012.

Date: April 20, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 48 Filed 04/20/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 947 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 7, 2008. 

Whereas the United States and the Republic of Korea share 

a longstanding and comprehensive alliance rooted in the 

common principles of freedom and democracy; 

Whereas on June 11, 2007, the House of Representatives 

passed H. Res. 295 recognizing ‘‘the strong alliance between the Republic of Korea and the United States and 

expresses appreciation to the Republic of Korea for its 

contributions to international efforts to combat terrorism’’; 

Whereas on December 19, 2007, the Senate passed S. Res. 

279 recognizing that ‘‘the strength and endurance of the 

alliance between the United States and the Republic of 

Korea should be acknowledged and celebrated’’; 

Whereas, since 2000, the United States House of Representatives and the Republic of Korea National Assembly have 

engaged in an interparliamentary exchange to discuss 

issues central to the U.S.-Republic of Korea relationship; 

Whereas there are deep cultural and personal ties between 

the peoples of the United States and the Republic of 

Korea, as exemplified by the large flow of visitors and exchanges each year between the two nations, as well as the 

nearly two million Korean-Americans; 
2 

•HRES 947 EH 

Whereas Congress recognizes January 13 as Korean-American Day, honoring the contributions of Korean-Americans in forging stronger bilateral ties between our two 

countries; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea is the United States seventh 

largest trading partner and the United States is the third 

largest trading partner of the Republic of Korea with 

nearly $80 billion in annual trade volume; 

Whereas the United States and the Republic of Korea are 

working closely together to promote international peace 

and security, economic prosperity, human rights, and the 

rule of law; and 

Whereas Lee Myung-Bak, upon winning the election to become the next President of the Republic of Korea, stated 

that he would seek to further strengthen the relationship 

with the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Lee Myung-Bak on his election to the presidency of the 

Republic of Korea and wishes him well during his time of 

transition and on his inauguration on February 25, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### Robert S. SMITH, Appellant, v. Dorothy D. SMITH, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 28, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 93 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2007 

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table 

RESOLUTION 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

Whereas at approximately 11:30 a.m. on the 23rd of January, 2007, the Committee on Rules began consideration 

of a special order of business providing for consideration 

of H. Res. 78; 

Whereas the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) submitted an 

amendment to the Committee for its consideration; 

Whereas during a recess of the Committee, the gentleman 

from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) submitted a letter to the Chairwoman of the Committee on Rules requesting that his 

amendment be withdrawn from further consideration; 

Whereas that letter was date stamped in the customary practice of the Committee; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HRES 93 IH 

Whereas it has been the long standing practice of the Committee to not further consider amendments that have 

been so withdrawn; 

Whereas the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) 

made a motion to report a special order of business providing for consideration of the amendment by Mr. Kirk 

despite its withdrawal; 

Whereas when the issue of the withdrawal of the amendment 

was being debated by the Committee, the Ranking Republican Member attempted to obtain a copy of the letter 

from the Majority and the Majority willfully refused to 

produce a copy of the letter after repeated requests; and 

Whereas the wrongful refusal of the Majority to produce a 

copy of the letter under debate constituted a breach of 

the dignity and integrity of the Committee’s proceedings: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives dis2 approves of the actions taken by the Committee’s Majority 

3 and directs the Chairwoman of the Committee to under4 take practices to prevent future occurrences. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS