alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. 07-cr-237-01-SM

Jamil Scott,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Scott’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial

is granted (document no. 12). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of

March 2008. Defendant Scott shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than February 11, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:07-cr-00237-SM Document 13 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is rescheduled for February 22, 2008 at 

3:30 p.m. in Room 421. 

Jury selection will take place on March 4, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

January 31, 2008 

cc: Patrick J. Richard, Esq.

Mark Irish, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00237-SM Document 13 Filed 01/31/08 Page 2 of 2
|   | 1. | this      Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for      the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 8, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/      KEVIN T. MICHAELS |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|                     |   |   |                       | Kevin      T. MichaelsChief      Financial OfficerPowerwave      Technologies, Inc. |
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 0 0 0

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7611
TAHRIM SUPREME C. JIHAD, a/k/a Vincent Edward Little, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES HARVEY, Regional Administrator; LAURIE F. BESSINGER, Warden; W. ROUSE; JOYCE BROWN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-1970-2-22AJ, CA-96-1971-2-22AJ) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tahrim Supreme C. Jihad, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdictiononly over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Wayne Carter, Toni Celluci

and Stacey Durgin

v. Case No. 07-fp-023

NH Department of Health and

Human Services, Commissioner

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff Stacey Durgin’s request to proceed in forma

pauperis (document no. 4) is hereby granted, but only for the

purpose of waiving the filing fee.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-023-JM.

SO ORDERED.

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 2, 2007

cc: Christine D. Lavallee, Esq.

Catharine A. Mallinson, Esq.

Amy Beth Messer, Esq.

Bennett B. Mortell, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM Document 7 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 1

Carter et al v. NH Department of Health and Human Services, Commissioner Doc. 7

Dockets.Justia.com
Order entered April 9 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01555
- CV
CELERINA RAMIREZ AND RUBEN DELUIS, Appellant s V.
MARIO SCCAFFETTI AND RUBY LEE SCCAFFETTI , Appellee s On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 14315

ORDER As directed to do so, appellants have provided written verification they have paid for the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER Tenesa Shaw, Official Court Reporter for the 192 nd Judicial District Court, to file the record no later than May 11, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Shaw and the parties.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending December 26, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodSOUTH SHORE BANK                                                                                                        * BranchApplication by South Shore Bank, South Weymouth, Massachusetts, to establish a branch at 680 Hancock Street, Quincy, Massachusetts, pursuant to Section 208.6 of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

270 

KA 16-01650 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

ROBERT WYCHE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A.

HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell

P. Buscaglia, A.J.), dated June 1, 2016. The order, inter alia,

granted that part of the omnibus motion of defendant seeking to merge

the kidnapping in the second degree count of the indictment with the

robbery in the second degree count of the indictment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme

Court.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Arthur
Nadata, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Nu Horizons
Electronics Corp., certify that:





The Form
10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the period ended February 28, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics
Corp. for the periods presented.






/s/ Arthur
Nadata


Arthur
Nadata


Chairman
of the Board and CEO


Date:
April 29, 2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending December 31, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodARVEST BANK GROUP, INC.                                                                                                 4c8Arvest Bank Group, Inc., Bentonville, Arkansas, to acquire 14.04 percent of LODO Software, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska, and thereby engage in data processing activities.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableFIRST ARKANSAS BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                         4c8First Arkansas BancShares, Inc., Jacksonville, Arkansas, to acquire 20 percent of FAS Capital, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, and thereby engage in lending activities.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: 01/18/2012FIRST ARKANSAS BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                         4c8First Arkansas BancShares, Inc., Jacksonville, Arkansas, to increase its ownership in BVCA, LLC, from 18 percent to 100 percent, and continue to engage in lending.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: 01/18/2012
|   | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BY:    | /s/ John Lackland             |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | John Lackland                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   | (principal financial officer) |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 20, 2017

No. 04-17-00027-CR

IN RE Charles A. LHERAULT

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On January 17, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition 

complains the trial court has not ruled on a motion Relator filed with the trial court requesting 

copies of records from his trial. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to 

rule on the motion. The alleged refusal to rule occurred in 2016, when the Honorable Mary 

Roman was the presiding judge of the 175th District Court of Bexar County, Texas. Relator 

identifies Judge Roman as the respondent in his petition for mandamus. However, Judge Roman

is no longer the presiding judge of the 175 District Court. 

Pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we ABATE this proceeding for 

thirty days from the date of this order to allow the newly elected judge of the 175th District 

Court of Bexar County, Texas to consider Relator’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b) (“If the 

case is an original proceeding under Rule 52, the court must abate the proceeding to allow the 

successor to reconsider the original party’s decision.”). The trial judge is directed to consider the 

motion in question and determine what action, if any, to take upon said motion. 

Relator is ORDERED to file in this court either the appropriate motion to dismiss this 

original proceeding or an amended petition for writ of mandamus and appendix no later than 

fourteen days following the expiration of the thirty-day abatement.

It is so ORDERED on January 20, 2017.

PER CURIAM

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013CR10281, styled State of Texas v. Charles A. Lherault, pending in 

the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl presiding.
ATTESTED TO: _________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-25-01-SM

Kenneth Perron,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Perron’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

17). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of October 2009. Defendant

Perron shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than September 17,

2009. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00025-SM Document 18 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for October 5, 2009 at 

11:30 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on October 20, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

September 3, 2009 

cc: Michael Iacopino, Esq.

Rene Sororrio, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00025-SM Document 18 Filed 09/03/09 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certifications
      Pursuant to Section 906 of**


**The
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C Section 1350)**




The
      undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of Cosmo Communications Corporation,
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), which
      accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Cosmo Communications Corporation at
      the
      dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.




This
                4th day of August, 2006
            
            
            
            
            
            /s/
                Peter HorakPeter
                Horak
              Chief
                Executive Officer




The
      undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Cosmo Communications Corporation,
      certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), which
      accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Cosmo Communications Corporation. at
      the
      dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.




This
                4th day of August, 2006
            
            
            
            
            
            /s/
                Carol AtkinsonCarol
                Atkinson
              Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to American Software, Inc. and
      will be retained by Cosmo Communications Corporation. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it
      be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act
      of
      1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
      filing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40084

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SANTOS RODRIGUEZ-RIOS, also known as Juan Miguel Sosa, also known as 

Jorge Ambriz Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-6-6

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Santos Rodriguez-Rios (Rodriguez)

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently 

developed to allow consideration at this time of Rodriguez’s claim of ineffective 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40084 Document: 00512473068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-40084

assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct 

appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no 

opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” 

United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez’s 

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40084 Document: 00512473068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00215-CR

Paul L. Harris

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1436006R)

August 18, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 31, 2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50874

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL OLGUIN-RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-2487-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Daniel OlguinRamos raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.