alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02291-REB-MJW

VERNE JAY MERRELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ALLRED, D.O. FCC Health Services, and

PATRICIA MITCHELL, Program Mgt [sic] Officer, Health Services,

in their individual and professional capacities,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended

Complaint (Docket No. 118) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff currently has an

appeal of this matter pending before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Docket

Nos. 112, 113, 114, & 115. The filing of a timely notice of appeal divests the district

court of jurisdiction. Garcia v. Burlington Nothern R.R. Co., 818 F.2d 713, 721 (10th Cir.

1987). Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction to consider the subject motion.

Date: May 14, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02291-REB-MJW Document 121 Filed 05/14/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-22 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-22 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1994...... 33.91 60.27 27.58 16.29 17.54 123.60 3.72 14.57 46.98 480.70 1995...... 33.77 49.68 26.74 18.46 15.59 93.60 3.73 14.72 44.94 451.25 1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2002: Q2... 23.72 41.55 32.41 18.55 19.26 48.30 3.69 15.06 45.28 216.61  Q3... 28.88 48.00 28.87 21.00 30.85 75.68 3.69 14.83 44.27 329.62  Q4... 31.46 52.06 38.39 22.16 17.78 67.64 3.85 15.19 46.02 333.67 2003: Q1... 35.98 68.86 32.35 27.73 38.74 62.19 3.72 14.88 46.71 249.54  Q2... 24.61 43.91 32.67 18.01 28.73 55.73 3.72 14.67 48.45 241.93  Q3... 27.75 78.05 40.90 17.84 37.37 65.70 3.53 14.83 46.45 319.67  Q4... 35.13 79.92 42.70 23.13 28.16 75.70 4.11 14.85 47.42 313.07 2004: Q1... 45.07 60.59 43.04 35.57 56.02 98.51 3.86 15.02 47.24 341.06  Q2... 32.01 47.74 36.25 21.95 26.77 116.76 3.73 15.17 45.83 358.08  Q3... 33.42 32.56 62.64 18.04 42.06 143.63 3.76 14.56 44.91 359.39  Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Q2... 42.75 70.57 38.44 23.68 78.69 132.29 3.95 14.60 46.31 371.83  Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
EXHIBIT 

34 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 17 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
-1- 

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 

COLORADO 

Court Address: Denver City and County Building 

 1437 Bannock St. 

 Denver, Colorado 80202 

Plaintiff: United Western Bank 

v. 

Defendant(s): Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al. ▲ COURT USE ONLY ▲

Case No.: 2010CV3325 

Division: 2 

Attorneys for Plaintiff United Western Bank 

Kip B. Shuman (#23593) 

Rusty E. Glenn (#39183) 

THE SHUMAN LAW FIRM 

885 Arapahoe Avenue 

Boulder, Colorado 80302 

Telephone: (303) 861-3003 

Facsimile: (303) 484-4886 

Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) 

Tyler Weaver (pro hac vice) 

Karl P. Barth (pro hac vice) 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 

1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98101 

Telephone: (206) 623-7292 

Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 

[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE 

APPROVED

 

 

Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on 

any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and 

file a certificate of service with the Court 

within 10 days. 

Dated: May 06, 2011 

William W. Hood III 

District Court Judge 

DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT

 

EFILED Document 

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD 

Filing Date: May 6 2011 2:45PM MDT 

Filing ID: 37453283 

Review Clerk: Nancy E Magdaleno

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 17 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
-2- 

The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Stay the Case for 90 

Days, hereby stays all proceedings in this case until August 1, 2011. The parties reserve any 

rights to remove the case to federal court if and when the FDIC substitutes into the action, and 

the ordered stay shall not restrict the exercise of such rights. 

Dated: __________, 2011 BY THE COURT 

 

_____________________________ 

 William W. Hood III 

 Denver District Court Judge 

 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 17 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
No further continuances of the stay on this basis will be granted. I appreciate that this case is unusually complex 

and I am trying to afford counsel the latitude that the circumstances warrant. Nonetheless, more than a year has 

passed since the filing of the complaint. I have granted multiple extensions. An interlocutory appeal may be 

necessary. We need to move this case. 

Court Authorizer 

Comments: 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 17 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-229-01-SM

Tony Rosas

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 17) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 1, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 18 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: May 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

April 25, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Zaino, Esq.

 Jessica Brown, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00229-SM Document 18 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2
Milacron Inc. and Subsidiaries
              Computation of Per Share Earnings
                         (Unaudited)



<TABLE>
                           (In thousands, except per-share amounts)

                                     1998      1997      1996  
                                   --------  -------   --------
<S>                                <C>       <C>       <C>     
Net earnings                       $ 41,532  $80,589   $66,301 
Less preferred dividends                240      240       240
                                   --------  -------   ------- 
 Net earnings available
   to common shareholders          $ 41,292  $80 349   $66,061  
                                   ========  =======   =======  

Basic Earnings Per Share

 Weighted-average common shares
  outstanding                        38,875   39,583    37,667   
                                   ========  =======   =======   

     Per share amount              $   1.06  $  2.03   $  1.75
                                   ========  =======   =======  

Diluted Earnings Per Share

 Weighted-average common shares
   outstanding                       38,875   39,583    37,667   

 Add dilutive effect of stock
   options and restricted
   shares based on treasury
   stock method                         366      373       276     
                                   --------  -------   -------  
   Total                             39,241   39,956    37,943  
                                   ========  =======   ======= 

     Per share amount              $   1.05  $  2.01   $  1.74  
                                   ========  =======   =======  


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Kurt
      Freudenberg, Chief Financial Officer of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp., certify
      that:




The
      Form
      10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the period ended February 28, 2007
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and




The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. for the periods presented.




/s/
                Kurt FreudenbergKurt
                Freudenberg
              Vice
                President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
              Date:May
                10, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon
      request.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                 |                                          |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                            |                                     |
|         |                                                                 | /s/              Mark              Goldwasser |
|         | Mark              Goldwasser                                         |
|         | Chief                Executive OfficerAugust                11, 2006 |

----
H. Res. 994 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 14, 2008. 

Whereas Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia affects men, women, 

and children of all ages; 

Whereas this disorder is very distressing to those who have 

it, causing great discomfort and severe emotional stress; 

Whereas children with Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia are unable to participate in many normal childhood activities including most sports and are often subject to social discomfort because of their disorder; 

Whereas Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia includes a wide range 

of symptoms including life-threatening, uncontrollable 

bleeding and severe bruising; 

Whereas Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia is frequently 

misdiagnosed or undiagnosed by medical professionals; 

Whereas currently there is no cure for Glanzmann’s 

Thrombasthenia; 

Whereas it is essential to educate the public on the symptoms, treatments, and constant efforts to cure 

Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia to insure early diagnosis 

and treatment of the condition; 
2 

•HRES 994 EH 

Whereas Helen P. Smith established the Glanzmann’s 

Thrombasthenia Research Foundation in Augusta, Georgia, in 2001; 

Whereas Helen P. Smith and the Glanzmann’s 

Thrombasthenia Research Foundation have worked tirelessly to promote awareness of Glanzmann’s 

Thrombasthenia and help fund research on the disorder; 

and 

Whereas Congress should determine an appropriate day to 

designate as National Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia 

Awareness Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the designation of a National Glanzmann’s Thrombasthenia 

Awareness Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending June 28, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCARLILE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                4c8
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant To


Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John
Lackland, Chief Financial Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





1.
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m
      or 78o(d)); and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  November
16, 2009





BY:
              /s/ John LacklandJohn
      LacklandChief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Kurt
      Freudenberg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nu Horizons
      Electronics Corp., certify that:





The
      Form
      10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the period ended February 29, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and


The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. for the periods presented.


. /s/ Kurt
              FreudenbergKurt
              FreudenbergExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
              OfficerDate: May
              12, 2008






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon
      request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LARSCOM INCORPORATED FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,256
<SECURITIES>                                    22,245
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (519)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,211
<PP&E>                                          20,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,974
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,292
<SALES>                                         41,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,631
<CGS>                                           19,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,300)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (645)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
<FN>
<F1>(1) Represents basic earnings per share
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6357

WILLIAM HERBERT MCCLADDIE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:22-cv-01192-RMG)

Submitted: February 27, 2024, Decided: February 29, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Herbert McCladdie, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6357 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

After the district court denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, William Herbert 

McCladdie filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of his claims. The 

district court construed this motion as an unauthorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. McCladdie then filed another motion 

contesting his conviction. The district court construed this motion as seeking 

reconsideration of the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion and denied it on the merits.

We have reviewed the record and conclude that McCladdie’s motion for 

reconsideration of the dismissal of his Rule 60(b) motion for lack of jurisdiction is also an

unauthorized, successive § 2254 petition. See Bixby v. Stirling, 90 F.4th 140, 155 

(4th Cir. 2024). As such, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider this motion, id.

at 154, and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), was required to dismiss it as an unauthorized,

successive § 2254 petition.

Because the district court denied, rather than dismissed the motion, we vacate the 

district court’s order and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the motion 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6357 Doc: 6 Filed: 02/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Woods, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 448]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County *(Rooney,*J.), rendered September 28, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that certain comments made during the prosecutor’s summation constitute reversible error. However, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his arguments regarding the prosecutor’s *431summation. He either did not make a specific and timely objection, or made no request for further curative instructions and no timely motion for a mistrial *(see People v Heide,*84 NY2d 943; *People v Nuccie,*57 NY2d 818; *People v Robinson,*281 AD2d 564). In any event, any alleged error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *People v Stith,*291 AD2d 576). Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 892 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 29, 2008. 

Whereas the death of a family member, friend, or loved one 

is a devastating emotional event; 

Whereas the memorialization and celebration of the decedent’s life is the fabric of today’s funeral service; 

Whereas the family of the decedent has traditionally looked 

to funeral directors and morticians for consolation, 

strength, and guidance in the planning and implementation of a funeral ceremony; and 

Whereas March 11, 2008, would be an appropriate day to 

designate as ‘‘National Funeral Director and Mortician 

Recognition Day’’ to pay tribute to these funeral directors and morticians who, day in and day out, assist our 

Nation’s families in their times of sadness and grief and 

help families mourn a death and celebrate a life: Now, 

therefore, be it 
2 

•HRES 892 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the designation of a ‘‘National Funeral Director and Mortician Recognition Day’’. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0309 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GRALEN EUGENE HOBBLE, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2022

01/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0309