alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
19

A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted 

 USDA Farm Production Region 

 NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA 

Proportion of farm loans 

 outstanding, 2005 Q4 survey, 

 region share of national 

 total 2.8 8.9 26.9 22.0 7.8 5.4 5.3 8.7 5.4 6.8 

Sample coverage, 2005 Q4 

 survey, sample share of total 

 regional loans 11.3 2.9 17.8 32.3 22.0 11.4 5.4 5.2 9.2 27.1 

Avg. loan size, 2005 Q4 survey 

(thousands of dollars) 38.4 16.8 70.3 60.9 89.5 39.0 53.0 43.3 36.6 65.2 

 

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week 

 2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9 

 Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1 

 Q3 6.4 7.5 5.8 6.5 4.6 6.0 7.5 7.3 6.5 5.3 

 Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5 

 2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5 

 (.15) (.26) (.31) (.73) (.65) (.63) (.54) (.66) (.35) (.40) 

 Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2 

 (.29) (.17) (.37) (.34) (.71) (.63) (.45) (.71) (.36) (.50) 

 Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3 

 (.15) (.04) (.49) (.39) (.73) (.69) (.27) (.99) (.35) (.26) 

 

 Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2 

 (.59) (.22) (.30) (.71) (.54) (.83) (.54) (.58) (.39) (.42) 

 2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8 

 (.21) (.15) (.44) (.25) (.48) (.64) (.37) (.23) (.37) (.41) 

 Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1 

 (.19) (.05) (.66) (.32) (.45) (.31) (.57) (.19) (.40) (.24) 

 Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9 

 (.79) (.14) (.58) (1.15) (.38) (.75) (.41) (.45) (.29) (.08) 

 Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2 

 (.48) (.07) (.45) (.88) (1.01) (.81) (.30) (.22) (.30) (.10) 

 2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0 

 (.19) (.16) (.14) (.71) (.60) (.67) (.34) (.59) (.17) (.15) 

 Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7 

 (.19) (.21) (.77) (.75) (.28) (.65) (.33) (.19) (.05) (.18) 

 Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8 

 (.18) (.23) (.28) (.70) (.20) (.57) (.43) (.30) (.09) (.07) 

 Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5 

 (.80) (.19) (.35) (.45) (.23) (.58) (.49) (.10) (.07) (.16) 

 Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is Delta States, 

SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. They are calculated from 

100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.
Exhibit
      32.1





**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, the chief executive officer of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.
      (the “Company”), certifies that to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 29, 2007 (the “Annual
      Report”), which accompanies this certification fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Annual Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





The
      foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no person shall be
      entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any other purpose. The
      undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
      certification except as required by law.


/s/ James
              D.
              FergusonJames
              D. FergusonDate:
                December 20, 2007
            President and Chief Executive
              Officer
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND ASAY,

SAMUEL VIDAL GOMEZ,

JERRY LEE RHEA,

DENNIS GLENN COEN,

LOUIE GEORGE SCHIMPF, and

QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Samuel Vidal Gomez’s (“Gomez”)

Notice [Docket No. 65; Filed February 29, 2012] (the “Motion”). The Court construes the

Motion as a request to extend the stay previously imposed in this case. The parties are

reminded that all requests for action by the Court should be made in the form of motions.

In support of his obligation pursuant to D.C.COLO.L.CivR 7.1A., Defendant Gomez states

that Plaintiff is unopposed to the relief requested. See Motion [#65] at 2. 

On November 29, 2011, the Court granted a Motion to Stay Civil Proceedings

Pending Resolution of Criminal Charges [#23]. See Order [#58]. In that Order, the Court

stated that, “An extension of the stay may be requested by the parties if it appears that any

parallel and related criminal proceedings may continue past March 19, 2012.” Id. at 5 n.3.

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 67 Filed 03/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

Defendant Gomez is set to begin a criminal trial in a parallel and related proceeding on

April 30, 2012. See Motion [#65] at 2. The trial is expected to last four-to-six weeks. See

id. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#65] is GRANTED. Scheduling and

discovery in this matter are hereby STAYED through June 22, 2012.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that the Scheduling Conference set for

April 18, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to July 31, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. in

Courtroom C-204 of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street,

Denver, Colorado.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling

order pursuant to the District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures. The

parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than July 26, 2012.

DATED: March 5, 2012 at Denver, Colorado.

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 67 Filed 03/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. LUTHER JONES TRUCK LINE et al.

No. 2435.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 8, 1942.

Pujo, Hardin & Porter, of Lake Charles, for appellant.

Fred C. Selby and McCoy & King, all of Lake Charles, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

The above plaintiff carried property damage insurance on the Chevrolet coupe, owned by the Universal Oil Tool Company and which was being driven by Cecil Cut-rer on the night of July 9, 1941, at the time this car collided with a truck and a trailer of Luther Jones. The plaintiff insurance company paid the Universal Oil Tool Company the sum of $474.75 for the damage to this car caused by the accident (on the basis of a total damage to the car of $524.-75, less a deduction of $50 under the policy) and took a subrogation from the company *871against Jones for the amount paid. The plaintiff sued Jones and his public liability insurer, the Allied Underwriters, to recover the amount paid by it, and made practically the same allegations of negligence against the driver of the Luther Jones truck as' were made by Cutrer in his suit against the same defendants. The defense to this suit is the same as that urged in the Cutrer suit, and the cases were consolidated for trial but separate judgments were rendered in each case in favor of the plaintiff.

As we found in the case of Cecil Cutrer against Luther Jones et al., 9 So.2d 8S9, this day decided, that Jones and his insurer were responsible for the damages resulting from the accident, it follows that they are liable for the damage to the car driven by Cutrer. There seems to be no serious question raised as to the amount of this damage, and as the proof fully supports the claim, the judgment awarding plaintiff the amount claimed by it is correct, and it is hereby affirmed at the cost of defendants.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         779,744
<SECURITIES>                                 4,847,779
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,670,518
<PP&E>                                         119,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,789,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          372,830
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,725
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,386,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,789,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,041
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (415,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (416,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (416,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.34)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. of our report dated October 30, 2003,included in the 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders of Span-America MedicalSystems, Inc.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Span-AmericaMedical Systems, Inc. listed in Item 15(a) for the years ended September 27,2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001. This schedule is theresponsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to expressan opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statementschedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects theinformation set forth therein.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 33-32896) pertaining to the Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.1987 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.33-84374) pertaining to the Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. 1991 StockOption Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70533)pertaining to the Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan andin the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75656) pertaining to theSpan-America Medical Systems, Inc. 2000 Restricted Stock Plan of our reportdated October 30, 2003 with respect to the financial statements incorporatedherein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph withrespect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.     ELLIOTT DAVIS, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00356-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. MICKEY MARIE PALMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 20, 2011 [Docket No. 17]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 10, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 10, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 20, 2011.

Case 1:11-cr-00356-PAB Document 18 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Richard Patton, President, Chief Executive Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Richard Patton                          
|G. Richard Patton                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

May 6, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western
Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00356-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. MICKEY MARIE PALMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER SETTING CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

_____________________________________________________________________

Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer

A Notice of Disposition was filed on October 20, 2011 [Docket No. 17]. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for November 10, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Counsel for the

parties shall email a courtesy copy of all change of plea documents separately to my

chambers and to the Probation Department not later than 48 hours before the change

of plea hearing. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C. On the date of the hearing, counsel shall

bring with them an original and one copy of the plea agreement and the statement in

advance. See D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1F.

The Plea Agreement and Statement Relevant to Sentencing required by

D.C.COLO.LCrR 11.1C (in the form prescribed by Appendix J) shall include also a

separate section identifying each essential element required by law for the commission

of each criminal offense to which the defendant intends to enter a plea of guilty. It is

further

ORDERED that the Trial Preparation Conference previously scheduled for

November 10, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. is VACATED.

DATED October 20, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKEN, Education Department,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Notice and Request for Continuance of

the Proceeding (Docket No. 80) is denied as moot. 

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s letter regarding retaliation and denial of

legal property and documents (Docket No. 83) is granted in part and denied in part. 

The letter motion is granted to the extent that the Clerk of Court shall send the plaintiff a

copy of Docket Nos. 3 (Order Granting 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion Without Payment of

Initial Partial Filing Fee) and 61 (Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order in which a Status

Conference is set for April 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.). In addition, the Clerk of Court shall

send a copy of this Minute Order and a copy of Docket No. 61 to the plaintiff’s

case manager at USP Lewisburg so that such case manager can initiate plaintiff’s

telephone to the court for the Status Conference on April 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m.

Mountain Time. In all other respects, plaintiff’s letter motion is denied. As indicated in

Docket No. 3, it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to make the necessary arrangements to

make his monthly payments toward the filing fee for this action. In addition, the court

will not direct non-party USP Lewisburg to provide plaintiff with extra materials or law

library time due to this action.

It is further ORDERED that if plaintiff seeks relief from this court, he shall do so in

the form of a motion, not a letter, with a copy sent to defense counsel.

Date: March 12, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 85 Filed 03/12/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-51204 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WALTER RUBIN MAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-99-CV-746-HG USDC No. SA-95-CR-309-1

-------------------- December 22, 2000 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Walter Rubin May, federal prisoner # 21686-077, has appealed

the distr ict court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to

vacate. WE AFFIRM.

The district court granted a certif icate of appealability

(COA) on whether the court should have held an evidentiary hearing

relative to May’s two claims that his counsel’s failure to present

the testimony of three named persons at his sentencing hearing

constituted inef fective assistance. This court holds that thereNo. 99-51204 -2-

was no abuse of the district court’s discretion in so ruling,

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its

COA order. U nited States v. May
, No. SA-99-CV-746-HG (W.D. Tex.

Jan. 7, 2000)(unpublished).

May contends that the district court erred by denying relief

on his claims of (1) counsel ineffectiveness during the trial,

(2) knowing use of pe rjured testimony by the Government, and

(3) failure of the Government to provide favorable evidence to the

defense. These rulings are not appealable, however, for lack of a

COA relative to them. See United States v. Kimler , 150 F.3d 429,

431 n.1 (5th Cir. 1998).

May’s pro se application for leave to file a supplemental

brief is DENIED, because he is represented by counsel. S ee 5 TH C IR

.

R. 28.7.

MOTION DENIED; JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 25

### CFR Correction

In title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, parts 20 to 39, revised as of October 1, 2007, in § 25.208, on page 239, in Table 1G in paragraph (g) and, on page 240, in Table 1H in paragraph (h) make the following change:

                    For each entry in the tables, remove the number “40” from the third column, “Percentage of time during which EPFDdown                     level may not be exceeded” and add it to the fourth column, “Reference bandwidth (kHz)”.                

[FR Doc. E8-23115 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant To


Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, John
Lackland, Chief Financial Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





1.
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
      31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or
      78o(d)); and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
17, 2010





BY:
              /s/ John LacklandJohn
      LacklandChief
      Financial Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
Exhibit 15.1

Consent for 20-F for 2013

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-180880) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-161683, 333-161684 and 333-167643) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated April 8, 2014 relating to the financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
|PricewaterhouseCoopers AB    
|Stockholm, Sweden            
|April 8, 2014
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 1 of 6

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 2 of 6

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 3 of 6

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 4 of 6

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 5 of 6

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK   Document 161-19   filed 10/17/12   USDC Colorado   pg 6 of 6