alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Clifford E. Avery

v. Civil No. 06-cv-448-SM

RI Dep’t of Corrections, et al.

O R D E R

Denied (document no. 15, Request for Certificate of

Appealability). The petition was dismissed as a second or

successive petition filed without prior authorization from the

Court of Appeals. 28 U.S.C. Section 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner

should seek such authorization in the Court of Appeals. 

Apparently, he simply appealed the dismissal, but did not seek

authorization to file a second petition. In any event, there is

nothing in the request for a certificate of appealability that

qualifies as “substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. Section 2253(c)(2). 

Accordingly, the request is denied.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

May 2, 2007

cc: Clifford E. Avery, pro se

Aaron L. Wiesman, Esq.

Stephen Fuller, Esq.

Jon Vinson, NH DOC

Case 1:06-cv-00448-SM Document 16 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 1
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 BANKUNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
  

	1.	 	The name of the Corporation is BankUnited Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”). 

  

	2.	 	The amendments adopted amend the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of the Corporation. 

  

	 	a.	 	The second paragraph of the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of the Corporation shall provide in its entirety as follows:


  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors
of the Corporation desires to (i) establish a series of the Class A Common Stock, designating such series “Series I Class A Common Stock,” (ii) allocate 50,000,000 shares of the authorized Class A Common Stock to the Series I Class A
Common Stock, (iii) fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of the shares of the Series I Class A Common Stock, and (iv) fix and determine the conversion rights of the Class B Stock; 
  

	 	b.	 	Paragraph (1) of Section I of the Statement of Designation of the Series I Class A Common Stock of the Corporation shall provide in its entirety as follows:


  
 I. Designation, Allocation
and Rights of Series I Class A Common Stock. 
  
 (1) Designation and Allocation. 50,000,000 of the 60,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock authorized by the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation hereby are determined to be and shall be of a series designated as Series I
Class A Common Stock (herein called “Series I Class A Stock”). 
  

	3.	 	These amendments were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on March 24, 2004. 

  

	4.	 	No shareholder action was required to adopt the amendments. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment have been executed on behalf of the Corporation by the undersigned on this 24th day of March, 2004.

  

	
	BANKUNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	
	 By: /s/    Lawrence H. Blum        

	

	        Lawrence H. Blum
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0170

_________________

MONTY CLARENCE PETERSEN,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

JENNIFER J. SIMON, APRN, 

 Defendant and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Leslie Halligan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2023

11/01/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0170
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Investments Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd Weyhrich, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of  operations of the Company.


























Date: August 27, 2009








/s/ Todd Weyhrich





Todd Weyhrich


Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
H. Res. 979 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 14, 2008. 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Committee on the Judiciary, detailing the refusal 

of former White House Counsel Harriet Miers to appear before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative 

Law as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney 

for the District of Columbia, to the end that Ms. Miers be 

proceeded against in the manner and form provided by law; 

and be it further 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Committee on the Judiciary, detailing the refusal 

of former White House Counsel Harriet Miers to testify before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative 

Law as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney 

for the District of Columbia, to the end that Ms. Miers be 

proceeded against in the manner and form provided by law; 

and be it further 
2 

•HRES 979 EH 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Committee on the Judiciary, detailing the refusal 

of former White House Counsel Harriet Miers to produce 

documents to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law as directed by subpoena, to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, to the end that Ms. 

Miers be proceeded against in the manner and form provided 

by law; and be it further 

Resolved, That pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 192 and 194, the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives shall certify the report of the Committee on the Judiciary, detailing the refusal 

of White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten to produce documents to the Committee on the Judiciary as directed by 

subpoena, to the United States Attorney for the District of 

Columbia, to the end that Mr. Bolten be proceeded against 

in the manner and form provided by law. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00293-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JAIME SANCHEZ-CAMACHO,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

A Notice of Disposition was received in the above captioned matter on

September 12, 2011. Accordingly, the 3-day jury trial set to commence Monday,

October 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED. A Change of Plea Hearing is SET for

Friday, October 28, 2011, at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom A-1002.

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents

separately to Judge Daniel’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later

than 72 HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted,

the hearing will be vacated. There will be no exceptions to this policy.

Dated: September 15, 2011.
#### In the Matter of Harry E. Dunlap, Appellant, v District Attorney of Ontario County, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 364]

Appeal from an order of Ontario County Court (Henry, Jr., J. ), dated May 22, 2001, which denied petitioner’s motion for the disclosure of grand jury testimony.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion for disclosure of grand jury testimony from a proceeding in New York sought in connection with an application for postconviction relief in Pennsylvania. Petitioner failed to meet his burden of establishing “a compelling and particularized need” for disclosure *(Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County,*58 NY2d 436, 444). The testimony sought was from a witness who admitted in the Pennsylvania *857trial that she had not been truthful in that portion of her prior grand jury testimony in New York that dealt with her lack of knowledge of the presence of drugs in the vehicle petitioner was driving and in which the witness was a passenger. Thus, the credibility of that witness had been impeached during the trial in Pennsylvania, and there was no compelling need for her grand jury testimony to impeach her credibility further. Nor can it be said that the public interest in disclosure outweighed the public interest in the secrecy of grand jury proceedings *(see Matter of Lungen v Kane,*88 NY2d 861, 862-863; *Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County,*58 NY2d at 444). Although CPL 190.25 (4) (a) permits a witness to disclose his or her own grand jury testimony, petitioner has cited no authority to support his contention that a partial disclosure constitutes a waiver of the general secrecy provisions applicable to grand jury proceedings, and we reject that contention. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2010

For the relief of Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul

Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima

Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR

4 KADIATOU DIALLO, LAOURATOU DIALLO,

5 IBRAHIMA DIALLO, ABDOUL DIALLO, AND

6 MAMADOU BOBO DIALLO.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

8 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

9 Act, Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo,

10 Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo shall each be
2

•HR 2010 IH

1 eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust2 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

3 permanent residence upon filing an application for

4 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such

5 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi6 dent.

7 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Kadiatou Diallo,

8 Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, or

9 Mamadou Bobo Diallo enters the United States before the

10 filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall

11 be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and

12 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of

13 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation14 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

15 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

16 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap17 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica18 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

19 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

20 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

21 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res22 idence to Kadiatou Diallo, Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima

23 Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and Mamadou Bobo Diallo, the Sec24 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce

25 by 5, during the current or next following fiscal year, the
3

•HR 2010 IH

1 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

2 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

3 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli4 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

5 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

6 under section 202(e) of such Act.

7 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

8 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

9 parents, brothers, and sisters of Kadiatou Diallo,

10 Laouratou Diallo, Ibrahima Diallo, Abdoul Diallo, and

11 Mamadou Bobo Diallo shall not, by virtue of such relation12 ship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the

13 Immigration and Nationality Act.

Æ
#### Elizabeth JAMISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 28, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements,



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-61559,
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-87694,
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-102100,
| | - |  | -------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-112659,
| | - |  | -------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3 No. 333-122963, and
| | - |  | ----------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-8 No. 333-133769
| | - |  | -----------------------

of our report
dated November 21, 2007, with respect to the fiscal year 2007 consolidated financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Integral Systems, Inc., and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2007.

/S/ BERNSTEIN & PINCHUK LLP

New York, New York

December 12, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,909,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                   234,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,968,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,157,610
<PP&E>                                       6,587,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,018,073)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,830,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,224,556
<BONDS>                                      3,434,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,047
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,134,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,830,973
<SALES>                                      5,380,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,380,252
<CGS>                                        3,923,865
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,923,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,441,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (25,050)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,653)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Schawk, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James J. Patterson,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ James J. Patterson
--------------------------------
James J. Patterson
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

March 14, 2003
#### Annie Kirkland, as Administrator of the Estate of Marcus Williams, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v Yosee Hirsch et al., Appellants.

[745 NYS2d 494]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated August 14, 2001, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging personal injuries and wrongful death.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that there exist triable issues of fact as to whether the defendant driver used reasonable care in the operation of his vehicle, and whether his *533negligence, if any, contributed to the accident *(see Rawson v City of New York,*292 AD2d 583; *Lopez v Coleman,*265 AD2d 454; *McCann v Mahoney,*214 AD2d 607; *Bank of N.Y. v Walsh,*129 AD2d 668). O’Brien, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### Peter INGRASSIO, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TOYE BROS. YELLOW CAB CO., Inc., Defendant and Appellant.*

No. 14319.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 19, 1932.

David Sessler, of New Orleans, for appellant.

J. A. Woodville and Jules A. Grosser, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

*

 Rehearing denied January 16, 1933.

JANVIER, J.

Plaintiff, while a passenger in a taxicab, operated by defendant company, received injuries under circumstances which counsel for defendant admits rendered his client liable.

In the court below, judgment for $250 was rendered, and the matter comes before us solely on the question of quantum.

Plaintiff described his injuries as follows:

> “I had my arm hurt on the handle that is on the cab that you hold on. .It hurt my arm, my right arm.”

> “It was a week before I could go back to work.”

> “I had pain in my arm I guess, two weeks after I went back to work.”

The doctor who treated plaintiff did not testify, though an attempt to explain his absence is made. It is said that he had appeared in court on several occasions, and that, after the case was continued so often, he found that he did not have time to return on the day on which the trial actually took place.

*912Dr. Miller who, on behalf of defendant, examined the plaintiff one week after the accident said: “He had a discoloration, bluish mark, on the right arm, the middle half.”

It is evident that the amount allowed is more than is justified by the injuries, and we think that *$125 is*ample remuneration therefor.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, amended by reducing the amount thereof to $125, and, as thus amended, it is affirmed.

Amended and affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,776,624
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,730,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,909,315
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     50,563,814
<ALLOWANCE>                                    776,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,268,399
<DEPOSITS>                                  57,146,382
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            377,677
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,310,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,792,290
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,641,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              69,268,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,342,213
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              242,275
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                90,928
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,675,416
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,201,931
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,302,870
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,372,546
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  146,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,009,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                423,483
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     328,783
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   328,783
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               620,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              776,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           776,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JERMAINE BERNARD WALLS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-889

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 22, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Lisa Lott, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON,, JJ., Concur.