alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 886 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 14, 2008.
Whereas on Sunday, December 9, 2007, a man entered the New Life Church property 
        with the intent to cause harm to members and guests of the church;
Whereas the attacker shot 5 bystanders at the New Life Church, killing 2 of them 
        and injuring 3 others;
Whereas the shooting resulted in the tragic loss of Stephanie Works, 18, and 
        Rachel Works, 16, who lost their lives from wounds sustained from shots 
        fired by the attacker;
Whereas the attacker wounded David Works, who was still hospitalized days after 
        the shootings, Judy Purcell, and Larry Bourbannais;
Whereas Jeanne Assam, a volunteer private security guard, heroically rushed into 
        harm's way and used her own gun to stop the shooter, thereby saving the 
        lives of several other bystanders;
Whereas the quick response of private security, the El Paso County Sheriff's 
        Office, the Colorado Springs Police Department, the Colorado Springs 
        Fire Department, the Colorado Springs SWAT Team, Federal authorities, 
        and medical professionals limited the danger to the church and local 
        community;
Whereas this event occurred only hours after another tragic and fatal shooting, 
        which occurred at the Youth With A Mission facility, located in Arvada, 
        Colorado;
Whereas the shooting at Youth With A Mission resulted in the death of Tiffany 
        Johnson, 26, and Philip Crouse, 24;
Whereas the attacker seriously wounded Dan Griebenow and Charlie Blanch; and
Whereas local first responders in the city of Arvada and in Jefferson County, 
        Colorado, responded quickly and professionally, thereby saving wounded 
        individuals: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) offers its heartfelt condolences to the victims and families of 
        the tragic acts of violence in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Arvada, 
        Colorado; and
            (2) conveys its gratitude to Jeanne Assam, city and county 
        officials, as well as the police, fire, sheriff, Federal authorities, 
        and emergency medical teams whose quick response saved lives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### WILLIAMS v. DISTRICT GRAND LODGE NO. 21, GRAND UNITED ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS OF LOUISIANA.

No. 17244.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 9, 1940.

For former opinion, see 192 So. 142.

E. B. Charbonnet, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellant.

Moise S. Steeg, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Our attention has been called to the fact that in affirming the judgment of the lower court we inadvertently allowed six percent per annum interest from the date of the death of the insured as would have been authorized as a penalty under Act No. 17 of 1920. Counsel for all parties concede that this act has no application. The interest^ therefore, will be changed from six percent per annum to five percent per annum, the legal rate, and will run from judicial demand. Our decree is amended accordingly.

Rehearing refused.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In re: Eugene O’Neil, Jr.,

Debtor

O R D E R

Motion denied. Appellant has not made a plausible showing

of likelihood of success on the merits, nor of potential

irreparable injury to the extent the trustee has undersold the

asset, economic injury is subject to remedy. See also Bankruptcy

Court Order dated March 20, 2008. The motion and the order shall

be publically docketed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

March 27, 2008

cc: Charles A. Russell, Esq.

Victor W. Dahar, Esq., Trustee

Geraldine Karonis, Esq.

Matthew Benson, Esq.

Thomas Pappas, Esq.

Gail Bakis, Esq.

James Perullo, Esq.

Mark Cornell, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00116-PB Document 5 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
J. Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




November 14, 2008


                                      /s/ J. BRYANT KIRKLAND III
                                      -----------------------------------
                                         J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                         Vice President, Treasurer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Steven Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006
|                      | 
|BY:                   |  | /s/ Steven Strasser                    
|                      |  | Steven Strasser Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
August 3, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

________________________________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00681

- CV
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER , Appellant
V.
LANCE MCKE NZIE, INDIVIDUALLY A ND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY M CKENZIE

- THUE (DECEASED), DEB ORAH DIVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND O F J

. O

. , A MINOR , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order denying the plea to the jurisdiction of appellant, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center , signed August 23, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the order

. We AFFIRM the order of the court below. We order appellant, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, jointly and sev erally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 7
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-18 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 7
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2183 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2183

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to allow public water systems to 
         avoid filtration requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

  Mr. Engel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to allow public water systems to 
         avoid filtration requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FILTRATION REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1412(b)(7)(C) of title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act 
(42 U.S.C. 300g-1) is amended by adding the following at the end of 
clause (iii): ``After such 12 month period, based on information, 
technology, or evidence not available prior to the expiration of such 
12-month period, any public water system supplied by surface water 
sources may apply to the State agency for a determination that, under 
the criteria established under clause (i), the system is not required 
to use filtration. After notice and opportunity for public comment, but 
not later than 120 days after receipt of such application, the State 
shall make such determination and publish notice thereof.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONUNDER SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each ofthe undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofGolf Trust of America, Inc. 

 
| Date: November 7, 2007 |   | /s/ W. Bradley  Blair, II              |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | W. Bradley  Blair, II                  |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer  and President      |
|                   |   |                                        |
| Date: November 7, 2007 |   | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                       |   |
|                   |   | Tracy S. Clifford                           |
|                   |   | Principal Accounting Officer  and Secretary |

 

----
Exhibit 10.12

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT is dated as of August 15, 2003, between **BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION**, a Delaware corporation, and **BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF NEW JERSEY, INC.,** a New Jersey corporation, (collectively referred to herein as the "Borrower") and **NATIONAL CITY BANK** (the "Bank"). 

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower previously executed a certain Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated as of February 1, 2001 ("Original Agreement"); and

	WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower previously executed a certain Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of February 1, 2003 ("Amended and Restated Agreement") which amended certain terms of, and restated, the Original Agreement; and

WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to amend the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement as set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Borrower jointly and severally agrees with Bank as follows:

1.	Effective as of June 1, 2002, Section 5.07(3) is deleted in its entirety.

2.	Section 6.06 of the Amended and Restated Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of June 1, 2002, to add new Subsection (4) to read as follows:

"(4)  any joint venture, partnership or other Person for the purpose of operating a business or acquiring real estate or other assets."

3.	Effective as of June 1, 2002, old Section 6.06(4) of the Amended and Restated Agreement is hereby renumbered as Subsection 6.06(5) and amended (i) to delete clause (a) in its entirety and (ii) to delete "four (4%)" from clause (b) and to replace it with "seven and one-half (7.5%) percent".  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Axel Adams, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 512]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered March 21, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s conviction stemmed from a robbery and an attempted robbery simultaneously committed against employees of two adjacent Brooklyn businesses, located in a single building on Bedford Avenue. The trial evidence demonstrated that the defendant robbed the clerk of one business of a gold chain at knifepoint, while his unapprehended accomplice was ultimately thwarted in his attempt to rob an employee of the second business. The defendant was arrested in flight from the scene of the crimes, and the chain taken from the victim of the robbery was recovered, along with a knife that resembled the knife used by the defendant.

The defendant argues that his conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree must be reversed. We disagree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove that the defendant knowingly and intentionally acted in concert with the unapprehended accomplice, sharing the criminal intent to commit simultaneous robberies of the two businesses *(see*Penal Law § 20.00; *People v Schermerhorn,*283 AD2d 524, 525; *People v Davis,*260 AD2d 726, 729; *People v Gage,*259 AD2d 837, 838-839). Moreover, the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Malizia,*62 NY2d 755, *cert denied*469 US 932; *People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84; *People v Valderrama,*285 AD2d 902, 904; *People v Knight,*192 AD2d 676, 677). The two perpetrators entered the premises together, and immediately split up en route to their respective target businesses. They both an*419nounced robberies. In each instance, employee resistance was initially overcome by the use of knives. The defendant testified at trial and admitted that he was in the premises to deliver a package he believed contained drugs or currency. However, there was no evidence from which to reasonably conclude that these simultaneous crimes were committed by two perpetrators acting independently, by coincidence.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02272-WJM-MEH

GERUN L. SCURLOCK

Plaintiffs,

v.

LOWE’S HIW, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss

filed April 30, 2012 (ECF No. 42). The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully

advised hereby ORDERS as follows:

The Parties’ Stipulated Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The above-captioned

matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay his/its own attorney’s

fees and costs.

Dated this 3011th day of April, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02272-WJM-MEH Document 43 Filed 04/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 551,969 23,371 38,417 59,443 74,347 154,44Number of loans 13,615 6,674 2,702 1,677 1,133 1,01Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.64 9.68 13.26 27.54 15.54 43.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 13.84 4.93 9.03 13.26 8.62 23.2

Weighted average risk rating3 2.46 2.55 2.34 2.48 2.60 2.4

Weighted average interest rate4 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Standard error5 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 25th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other livestock .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other current operating expenses7 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Farm machinery and equipment .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Farm real estate .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other8 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 51.60 48.90 39.34 54.71 43.49 55.7 Under commitment 48.33 60.63 45.00 39.78 43.42 49.0 Callable 11.80 20.53 17.63 24.76 12.65 15.3 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.38 6.18 8.59 11.29 16.03 7.6 Other livestock 10.00 14.02 10.37 13.22 13.53 4.7 Other current operating expenses7 63.49 68.05 58.20 46.05 56.37 61.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.06 3.80 9.11 11.77 6.35 7.6 Farm real estate 8.90 .41 1.98 11.99 4.40 11.8 Other8 4.18 7.54 11.75 5.67 3.33 7.0

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 23.30 10.55 5.66 19.36 3.82 38.4 Other 67.80 82.66 90.12 77.37 91.78 61.5 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
EXHIBIT 31.1

          I, Monroe G. Milstein, certify, that:

          (1)     I have read Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 29, 2004 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "registrant");

          (2)     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          (3)     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          (4)     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

                  (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          (5)     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

                  (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Monroe G. Milstein
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 02-cr-00518-LTB-01 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TRACY DEAN NUNEZ, 

 Defendant. 

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO TRAVEL INTERNATIONALLY 

 THIS MATTER is before the Court upon request by the probation officer 

 HAVING considered the probation officer's report, the Court 

 ORDERS that the defendant’s travel request is granted, authorizing travel to Las 

Alamedas, Mexico, from December 19, 2015, to January 9, 2016. 

 

DENIES the request with further instruction: 

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this day of December, 2015. 

 BY THE COURT: 

Lewis T. Babcock 

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 1:02-cr-00518-LTB Document 48 Filed 12/03/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1