alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH MARCH 1999 10Q
</LEGEND> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  128,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    457,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               638,322
<PP&E>                                      12,570,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                 532,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,665,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,179,099
<BONDS>                                        167,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    22,530,700
<OTHER-SE>                                 (10,331,681)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,665,503
<SALES>                                        971,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               971,041
<CGS>                                          740,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,759,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             9,600,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             315,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,703,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,627,458)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (520,352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (6,556,106)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,076,458)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2005 | /s/ Stephen D. Rubin          |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Stephen D. Rubin,             |   |
|                         | President                     |   |
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Peter S. Toth, Petitioner, v Nassau County Police Department et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d 720]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated April 26, 2000, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of certain charges of misconduct, and suspending him without pay from duty as a police officer with the Nassau County Police Department for a period of 270 days.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The respondents’ findings that the petitioner was guilty of two counts of engaging in conduct unbecoming an officer, one count of using departmental equipment other than in the course of official business, four counts of engaging in unlawful conduct, two counts of failing to treat as confidential the official business of the Nassau County Police Department, and one count of making or submitting, or causing to be submitted, a false official communication, record, or statement, are supported by substantial evidence in the record *(see Matter of Curto v Cosgrove,*256 AD2d 407). The respondents’ finding of police misconduct and their determination regarding the appropriate internal discipline to be imposed are entitled to great deference and, under the circumstances of this case, will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Gamma v City of Newburgh,*277 AD2d 236; *Matter of Steinberg v Dooley,*168 AD2d 499).

*576The penalty imposed was permissible pursuant to Civil Service Law § 76 (4) and Nassau County Administrative Code § 8-13.0 *(see Matter of Coscette v Town of Wallkill,*281 AD2d 479), and is not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32). O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         120,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  856,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    854,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,062,400
<PP&E>                                       2,338,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 920,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,898,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,395,800
<BONDS>                                        482,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,700
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,962,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,898,700
<SALES>                                      7,485,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,485,900
<CGS>                                        4,134,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,134,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,871,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                415,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   407,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         789,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               789,942
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 789,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,633
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     779,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   789,942
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,348
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (71,376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (71,376)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (713.76)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (713.76)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EARNINGS PER SHARE IS PER 1% BENEFICIARY INTEREST.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2



Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements



| |  | Form S-8, No. 333-41123,
| | - | ------------------------



| |  | Form S-8, No. 333-61559,
| | - | ------------------------



| |  | Form S-8, No. 333-76360,
| | - | ------------------------



| |  | Form S-8, No. 333-87694,
| | - | ------------------------



| |  | Form S-3, No. 333-102100, and
| | - | -----------------------------



| |  | Form S-3, No. 333-112659.
| | - | -------------------------



of Integral Systems, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated November 21, 2003, with respect to the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements of Integral Systems, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2004.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



McLean, Virginia

December 08, 2004
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cosmo Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Cosmo Communications Corporation and subsidiaries
(incorporated in Florida) as of March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
deficiency, and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2002
and for the year ended December 31, 2001.  These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America.  Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
 misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidate
financial position of Cosmo Communication Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2002 and for the year ended December 31, 2001, in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company has incurred significant losses and has significant
working capital and stockholder deficiencies.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans relating to those matters are also
described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.



		"SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP"
Toronto, Canada
July 10, 2002		Chartered Accountants

Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
TORONTO, MONTREAL, OTTAWA



	1167 Caledonia Road
	Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1
	Tel:  416 785 5353
	Fax:  416 785 5663


Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
TORONTO, MONTREAL, OTTAWA



	1167 Caledonia Road
	Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1
	Tel:  416 785 5353
	Fax:  416 785 5663
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 8, 2022

----

Personnel            Division of Financial Stability -- appointment of Mona Elliot as senior adviser.            -Announced, January 6, 2022            Regulations and Policies            Regulation I (Federal Reserve Bank Capital Stock) -- final rule to automate non-merger-related adjustments to member banks' subscriptions to Federal Reserve Bank capital stock.            -Approved, December 22, 2021            (A/C)          Reserve Bank Operations            Reserve Bank Directors -- designation of chairs and deputy chairs of the Federal Reserve Banks for 2022.            -Announced, January 5, 2022            Savings and Loan Holding Companies            Double Bottomline Corp., Caldwell, Ohio -- commenter's request for review of the delegated approval of the application by Double Bottomline Corp. to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring Community Savings Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Community Savings, both of Caldwell, Ohio.             -Denied, January 4, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Adam H. Nagle

v. Civil No. 08-cv-413-JL

NH State Prison et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 18, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

January 14, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Adam H. Nagle, Pro se

Deborah B. Weissbard, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00413-JL Document 11 Filed 01/14/09 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending April 9, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK MIDWEST                                                                                                            * 18C
Label	Description
Date					monthly, last business day of month
U.S. Government security repo (millions)	U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of U.S. Government security repurchase agreements	millions of dollars
Other repo (millions)	 		U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of other security repurchase agreements 	millions of dollars
Certificates of deposit (millions)  	U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of certificates of deposit	millions of dollars
Unsecured commercial paper (millions)  	U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of unsecured commercial paper	millions of dollars
Asset-backed commercial paper (millions)  U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of asset-backed commercial paper	millions of dollars
Other instruments (millions)  		U.S. prime money market funds investment holdings of other instruments	millions of dollars
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 22 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 23 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 24 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 25 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 26 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 27 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 28 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 29 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 30 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 31 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 32 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 33 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 34 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 35 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 36 of 37
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 52 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 37 of 37
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Walter D. Wick

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00180-JL

Mark Schols

 O R D E R

Before ruling on the joint motion to continue trial

(document no. 118), the court asks that counsel confer and by

this Friday June 12, provide to the Deputy Clerk a "drop dead"

date -- a date by which they need to know if the trial will be

continued in order to allow them to prepare, but which will not

require them to waste resources if it turns out that the

continuance is granted. In other words, "For the sake of our own

schedules and our clients' resources, we'd like to know no later

than ________ if the trial will be continued." The court makes

this request because it is actively considering the pending

motions to the extent time and resources permit.

If, at this point, the parties and counsel would simply

prefer an immediate continuance just for certainty's sake, they

should simply notify the clerk of that fact. 

The court appreciates counsel's patience. 

Case 1:08-cv-00180-JL Document 119 Filed 06/10/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 10, 2009

cc: Steven E. Grill, Esq.

Anne E. Trevethick, Esq.

Gordon J. MacDonald, Esq.

Henry E. Kinser, Esq.

W. Daniel Deane, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00180-JL Document 119 Filed 06/10/09 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending July 18, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF CHOICE HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                          CICNotification submitted by Jean Hummel, Columbus, Ohio; Robert Hummel, II, and Patricia Hummel, both of Leawood, Kansas; Jennifer Ostenson and Eric Ostenson, both of Longmont, Colorado; all as members of the Robert Hummel family group, to retain control of Bank of Choice Holding Company, Greeley, Colorado, and thereby indirectly retain control of Bank of Choice, Greeley, Colorado.Newspaper: 07/31/2009Federal Register: 07/27/2009CENTRAL BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                   4c8