alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.2

(GEOSTAT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. LOGO)

                  CONSENT OF GEOSTAT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC.

Blainville, March 31, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission      Ontario Securities Commission
450 Fifth St. N. W.                     Suite 1903, Box 55
Washington, D.C. 20259                  20 Queen Street West
USA                                     Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3S8

SUBJECT: Our report dated February 23, 2004, VERIFICATION DES RESSOURCES ET DES
RESERVES DE LA MINE JOE MANN - RESSOURCES CAMPBELL INC.

I, Robert de l'Etoile, eng., do hereby consent to the filing of the written
disclosure of extracts of the technical report titled VERIFICATION DES
RESSOURCES ET DES RESERVES DE LA MINE JOE MANN, RESSOURCES CAMPBELL INC. and
dated February 23, 2004 (the "Technical Report") in the Item 4 of the Annual
Report in Form 20-F of RESSOURCES CAMPBELL INC. with the securities regulatory
authorities referred to above.

I also certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and that it
fairly and accurately represents the information in the technical report that
supports the disclosure.

However, it has come to our attention that the resource model has significantly
changed since the publication of our Technical Report. As a consequence we
consider that the resources published in our Technical Report are not current
and that they should only be treated as historical. Our Technical Report does
not support the written disclosure relating to resources and reserves dated past
December 31, 2003.

Yours truly,


/s/ Robert de l'Etoile
-------------------------------------
Robert de l'Etoile, eng.
March 31, 2006

----------
10 boul. De la Seigneurie, suite 203
Blainville (Quebec) Canada J7C 3V5
Telephone: (450) 433-1050
Fax: (450) 433-1048
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1992...... 100.0 2.0 5.3 25.3 41.1 19.6 5.1 1.6 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.0 1993...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 27.8 40.4 18.4 4.6 1.3 12.3 12.3 1.2 1.1 1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 1999: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.1 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ali Carrington, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 89]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J., at hearing; Richard D. Carruthers, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered July 8, 2003, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first and second *441degrees, and attempted robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 50 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements. The record establishes that defendant’s girlfriend voluntarily consented to the police and parole officers’ entry into the apartment she shared with defendant and to a search under the mattress of her bed, which yielded incriminating evidence. The consent was evidenced by the girlfriend’s written statement, made after the search was concluded, that confirmed the voluntariness of her consent *(see People v Williams,*278 AD2d 150 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 764 [2001]). The fact that the police went to the apartment in the company of parole officers does not undermine the voluntariness of the consent. Since defendant was a parolee and the parole officers were present for the purpose of conducting a home verification visit as part of their official duties, it was neither deceptive nor coercive for a parole officer to announce that fact to defendant’s girlfriend when he asked for and obtained her permission to enter. Furthermore, there was nothing coercive about the circumstances under which the girlfriend agreed to a search of the apartment, including the area under the bed. This consent followed a comment by an officer to the effect that the presence of any weapons in the apartment might raise safety concerns.

The record also supports the hearing court’s alternate conclusion that even without consent, the parole officers were entitled to perform a warrantless search of the apartment since their conduct was reasonably related to the performance of their official duties *(see e.g. People v Lopez,*288 AD2d 70 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 706 [2002]). Although the parole officers were cooperating with the police, who were investigating a homicide, the record fails to support defendant’s assertion that the parole officers were acting solely on behalf of the police. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
EXHIBIT 

37 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 19 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 

COLORADO 

Court Address: DenverCity and CountyBuilding 

 1437 Bannock St. 

 Denver, Colorado80202 

Plaintiff: United Western Bank 

v. 

Defendant(s): Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al. COURT USE ONLY 

Attorneys for Plaintiff United Western Bank 

Kip B. Shuman (#23593) 

Rusty E. Glenn (#39183) 

THE SHUMAN LAW FIRM 

885 Arapahoe Avenue 

Boulder, Colorado80302 

Telephone: (303) 861-3003 

Facsimile: (303) 484-4886 

Case No.: 2010CV3325 

Division: 2 

PROPOSEDORDER GRANTING THE JOINT MOTION REGARDING TIME FOR 

FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND BRIEFING OF MOTION FOR 

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 

The Court, having the parties’ joint motion, hereby orders as follows: 

1. Defendants shall have 30 days from any order substituting the FDIC as Plaintiff to 

file a notice of removal. 

2. Plaintiff’s response to the motion for interlocutory appeal, if any, will be due within 

45 days after any order substituting the FDIC as Plaintiff. 

 

Dated: August ___, 2011. BY THE COURT 

 

_____________________________ 

 William W. Hood III 

 Denver District Court Judge 

APPROVED

 

Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on 

any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and 

file a certificate of service with the Court 

within 10 days. 

Dated: Aug 12, 2011 

William W. Hood III 

District Court Judge 

DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT

EFILED Document 

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD 

Filing Date: Aug 12 2011 9:10AM MDT 

Filing ID: 39249236 

Review Clerk: Nancy E Magdaleno

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 19 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending August 16, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------
                             CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
                  Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE><CAPTION>
Earnings (Loss) Per Share                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                               2003                  2002
                                                           -----------           -----------
<S>                                                        <C>                   <C>
Net Earnings (Loss)                                        $   (31,639)          $   289,049
Less: Preferred Stock Dividends in Arrears                        --
                                                           -----------           -----------

Earnings (Loss) Available for Common Stockholders          $   (31,639)          $   289,049
                                                           ===========           ===========

Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding              3,839,429             3,897,611
                                                           ===========           ===========

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share                            $     (0.01)          $      0.07
                                                           ===========           ===========


Basic EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding              3,839,429             3,897,611

Effect of Diluted Securities:
                   Stock Options and Warrants (1)                 --                   4,289
                                                           -----------           -----------

Diluted EPS - Weighted Average Shares Outstanding            3,839,429             3,901,900
                                                           ===========           ===========

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share                          $     (0.01)          $      0.07
                                                           ===========           ===========
</TABLE>


(1) - The Company's outstanding stock options, warrants, and convertible
  preferred stock have antidilutive effect on net loss per share for the three
  months ended March 31, 2003. As a result, such amounts have been excluded from
  the computations of diluted loss per share for that period.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1166

ROBERT P. KELLY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1307-A) Submitted: September 21, 1999 Decided: September 29, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kathleen G. Walsh, ASHCRAFT & GEREL, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Joel E. Wilson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, James J. Gigliotti, Third Year Law Student, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on December 7, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on December 8, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Robert P. Kelly appeals the district court’s order grantingthe Government’s motion to dismiss his civil complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kelly v. United States , No. CA-98-1307-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### John W. O’Connor, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 97081.)

[744 NYS2d 903]

In a claim, inter alia, to recover damages for loss of property, the claimant appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (Ruderman, J.), dated April 19, 2001, as granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim, and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated May 4, 2001, which dismissed the claim.

*448Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the claim *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The Court of Claims properly dismissed the claim based upon bailment as the evidence at trial demonstrated that the defendant did not act in a grossly negligent manner with regard to the claimant’s personal property *(see Voorhis v Consolidated Rail Corp.,*60 NY2d 878; *Roth v Black Star Publ. Co.,*239 AD2d 484; *J.W. Mays, Inc. v Hertz Corp.,*15 AD2d 105).

We further find that the claimant failed to establish entitlement to recovery on his theories of negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress *(see Johnson v State of New York,*37 NY2d 378; *Ferrara v Bernstein,*179 AD2d 79, *affd*81 NY2d 895). Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K into the following Registration Statements of
Lafarge North America (formerly Lafarge Corporation) previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission: (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File
No. 2-92414, (ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-9813, (iii)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-32645, (iv) Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No. 33-32644 (which also constitutes Post-Effective
Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (v)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-20865, (vi) Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No. 33-46093 (which also constitutes Post-Effective
Amendment No. 7 of Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (vii)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-51873, (viii) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-65897, (ix) Registration Statement on Form
S-8, File No. 333-65899, and (x) Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No.
333-57333.






                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Vienna, Virginia
March 25, 2002
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending February 19, 2022

----

Bank Holding Companies            Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., Louisville, Kentucky  -- to acquire Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company, both of Louisville, Kentucky.            -Approved, February 16, 2022            Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend with revision the Capital Assessments and Stress Testing Reports  (FR Y-14A/Q/M).            -Approved, February 18, 2022                        Forms -- initial Board review to extend without revision the Notice of Proposed Stock Redemption (FR 4008).            -Approved, February 18, 2022                        Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Written Security Program for State Member Banks (FR 4004).            -Approved, February 18, 2022                        Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Quarterly Savings and Loan Holding Company Report (FR 2320).            -Approved, February 18, 2022                        Forms -- final Board review to extend without revision the Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Requirements Associated with Regulation NN (FR NN).            -Approved, February 18, 2022            Personnel            Division of Management -- appointment of Reginald Roach as associate director and Cathi Jack and Tim Ly as deputy associate directors.            -Announced, February 14, 2022                        Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems -- appointment of Edward Anderson as assistant director.            -Approved, February 14, 2022                        Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems -- appointment of Emily Caron as assistant director.            -Approved, February 18, 2022            Enforcement            Mesquite Financial Services, Inc., Alice, Texas -- written agreement dated July 6, 2017, terminated February 8, 2022.            -Announced, February 15, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements,



| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-41123
| | - |  | -----------------------

| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-61559,
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-76360,
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-8, No. 333-87694,
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-102100,
| | - |  | -------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3, No. 333-112659,
| | - |  | -------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3 No. 333-122963, and
| | - |  | ----------------------------

| |  |  | Form S-3 No. 333-129820
| | - |  | -----------------------



of our report dated November 30, 2005, with respect to the fiscal year 2005 consolidated financial statements, Managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, of Integral Systems, Inc., and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2005.



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Vienna, Virginia

November 30, 2005
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending April 9, 2022

----

Bank Holding Companies            Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Providence Rhode Island -- commenter's request for reconsideration of the Board's approval of the application by Citizens Financial Group, Inc., to acquire Investors Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Investors Bank, both of Short Hills, New Jersey.            -Denied, April 4, 2022            Enforcement            Regions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, and Merill Lynch Wealth Management (Merrill Lynch), Charlotte, North Carolina -- consent orders of prohibition against (1) Dedryck O. Carson, Wendy Rodriguez Legon, Micheal T. Lemley, and Tracy L. Mallory, former institution-affiliated parties of Regions Bank, and (2) Autumn Jordan and Manuel F. Pinazo, former institution-affiliated parties of Merrill Lynch (a subsidiary of Bank of America), all for fraudulently obtaining loans and grants administered under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act.            -Announced, April 5, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to and forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange         Act of 1934; and                                |  |
|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial         condition and results of operations of the Company. |  |

Dated:  November 13, 2002

/s/ Michael W. Levin                            Michael W. LevinChief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 13, 2002

/s/ Duncan Huyler                            Duncan HuylerPrincipal Financial Officer