alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 943 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 6, 2008.
Whereas January 28, 2008, marks the 22-year anniversary of the tragic accident 
        of the space shuttle Challenger, Mission 51-L, and the loss of seven of 
        America's bravest and most dedicated citizens;
Whereas the space shuttle Challenger disaster occurred off the coast of central 
        Florida, at 11:39 a.m. on January 28, 1986;
Whereas the space shuttle Challenger disintegrated 73 seconds into its flight 
        after an O-ring seal in its right solid rocket booster failed at lift-
        off;
Whereas the seven-person crew on the shuttle included Commander Francis R. 
        Scobee, Pilot Michael J. Smith, Mission Specialist Judith A. Resnik, 
        Mission Specialist Ellison S. Onizuka, Mission Specialist Ronald E. 
        McNair, Payload Specialist Gregory B. Jarvis, and Payload Specialist 
        Sharon Christa McAuliffe;
Whereas Christa McAuliffe, a schoolteacher from Concord, New Hampshire, was on 
        board as the first member in the Teacher in Space Project;
Whereas the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) selected 
        Christa McAuliffe from a field of 11,000 applicants to be a part of the 
        Challenger crew and teach lessons to schoolchildren from space;
Whereas the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives 
        conducted oversight hearings on the Challenger disaster and released a 
        report on October 29, 1986, on the causes of the accident; and
Whereas the House of Representatives continues to support NASA and its ongoing 
        efforts to explore and educate the American public about space: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the 22nd anniversary of the space shuttle Challenger 
        disaster;
            (2) celebrates the courage and bravery of the crew of the 
        Challenger, and Christa McAuliffe and her passion for encouraging 
        America's children to pursue careers in science and mathematics;
            (3) commits itself and the Nation to using the lessons learned in 
        inquiries into the space shuttle Challenger accident to ensure that the 
        space agency always operates on a strong and stable foundation; and
            (4) recognizes the continued dedication of the United States to the 
        goal of space exploration for the benefit of all mankind.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 11.1

INTEGRAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                                                                    |  |                                  |            |      |   |            |  |   |           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ---------- | ---- | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                                                                                                    |  | Twelve Months EndedSeptember 30,
|                                                                                                    |  | 2006                             |            | 2005 |   | 2004      
|Numerator:                                                                                          |  |                                  |            |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Net Income                                                                                          |  | $                                | 12,338,930 |      | $ | 6,300,920  |  | $ | 6,760,998 
|Denominator:                                                                                        |  |                                  |            |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted-average shares                                    |  |                                  | 10,891,053 |      |   | 10,282,420 |  |   | 9,895,357 
|Effect of dilutive securities:                                                                      |  |                                  |            |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Employee stock options                                                                              |  |                                  | 112,734    |      |   | 80,171     |  |   | 24,642    
|Contingently issuable shares                                                                        |  |                                  |           |      |   | 171,396    |  |   | 230,349   
|Denominator for diluted earnings per share adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions |  |                                  | 11,003,787 |      |   | 10,533,987 |  |   | 10,150,348
|Basic earnings per share                                                                            |  | $                                | 1.13       |      | $ | 0.61       |  | $ | 0.68      
|Diluted earnings per share                                                                          |  | $                                | 1.12       |      | $ | 0.60       |  | $ | 0.67
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 28, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1295

Lower Tribunal Nos. F93-18139C & F93-18141C

________________

Tramain Smith,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge.

Tramain Smith, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kayla Heather McNab, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS QTR. SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
BALANCE SHEET  AND STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR PERIOD ENDED MAR 31.2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1


<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 36,139
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (403,762)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               0
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               0
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-43432, 333-43430, 333-27449, and 333-43434) on Form S-8 and (No.
33-84766) on Form S-3 of Inland Resources Inc. of our report dated March , 2003,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Inland Resources Inc. as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Inland
Resources Inc.

Our report dated March 14, 2003, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered losses, has a net capital deficiency, and has
defaulted on its senior indebtedness, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 31, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-2235-MSK-CBS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

OPHYLL D’COSTA; and,

MARGARET D’COSTA

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

 JUDGMENT 

_____________________________________________________________________________

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Entry of Judgment (#22) as to

Defendants Ophyll D’Costa and Margaret D’ Costa. Having reviewed the Stipulation of the

parties and for good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Ophyll D’Costa for

the unpaid assessed balances on individual federal income taxes and accrued interest and

penalties for tax years 1999 and 2000 in the amount of $685,264.43, plus interest and other

statutory additions accruing from and after March 4, 2011, as provided by law pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621(a)(2) and 26 C.F.R. 301.6621-1, less any

credits or payments. 

3. Judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Margaret D’Costa

for the unpaid assessed balances on individual federal income taxes and accrued interest and

Case 1:11-cv-02235-MSK-CBS Document 23 Filed 02/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
penalties for tax years 1999 and 2000 in the amount of $695,702.69, plus interest and other

statutory additions accruing from and after March 4, 2011, as provided by law pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621(a)(2) and 26 C.F.R. 301.6621-1, less any

credits or payments. 

4. Each party shall bear its respective costs, including attorneys fees and other costs

associated with this litigation. 

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02235-MSK-CBS Document 23 Filed 02/23/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### In re PORTER et al.

No. 8741.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1938.

Samuel B. Weinstein, of Portland, Or., for petitioner.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court in this case determined the title to real estate as between the debtors and a third party and dismissed the proceeding under section 203, title 11 U.S.C.A., in so far as concerns such real estate. The decision determined a~ controversy between these parties and this court has no power to entertain a petition or allow an appeal.

Petition for allowance of appeal denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF EARNINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FILED IN THE 1995 JEFFERIES GROUP, INC. 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          68,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,408
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        1,092,904
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            167,210
<PP&E>                                          26,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,536,969
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     227,757
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            851,254
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              82,932
<LONG-TERM>                                     56,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               93
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,536,969
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               97,954
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            65,792
<COMMISSIONS>                                  165,610
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   72,003
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,365
<COMPENSATION>                                 195,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,238
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      53,238
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02284-RPM

TAHYS ACEVEDO and

LARY WAAG, JR.,,

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JBS USA, LLC,

 

Defendant.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE AND DENIAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS

____________________________________________________________________________

 

This civil action has been stayed since March 6, 2012, because of the pendancy of

Castaneda, et al., v. JBS USA, LLC, Civil Action No. 08-cv-01833-RPM. A final judgment was

entered in that case on May 6, 2014. On May 7, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss

this civil action based on claim preclusion from that final judgment. The plaintiffs filed their

opposition on May 28, 2014, and filed a notice of appeal in the Castaneda case. Because the

appeal of Castaneda could result in a new trial, it would be improper to dismiss this case with

prejudice. Because the duration of the appellate process is not predictable, it is now

ORDERED that this civil action is closed administratively pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR

41.2 and the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.

Dated: June 24th, 2014

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02284-RPM Document 30 Filed 06/24/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Andrew BROOKS v. ÆTNA INSURANCE COMPANY.*

No. 4343.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1932.

St. Clair Adams and St. Clair Adams, Jr., both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Warren Hunt, of Rayville, for appellee.

DREW, J.

In this case, for reasons assigned in the case of Andrew Brooks v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, 144 So. 788, decided this day by this court, the judgment of the 'lower court, is affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.01**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                August 15, 2007
            
            /s/
                Douglas G. MannerDouglas
                G. Manner,Chief
                Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harvey Nieves, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 832]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J), rendered on or about June 29, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
3RD QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                             784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,419
<INVENTORY>                                    242,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               313,802
<PP&E>                                          82,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,472
<BONDS>                                         31,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,459
<SALES>                                        428,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,386
<CGS>                                          357,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  357,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (84)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (289)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection
with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of STAAR Surgical Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended January 2, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: April 30, 2015 | /s/ Caren Mason                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Caren Mason                          
|                      | President, Chief Executive Officer   
|                      | and Director                         
|                      | (principal executive
        officer)





|Dated: April 30, 2015 | /s/ Stephen P. Brown                 
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                      | Stephen P. Brown                     
|                      | Chief Financial Officer              
|                      | (principal
        financial officer)