alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000696

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

BANK OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

DAVID K. BRAXTON, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

WAILUKU DIVISION

(CASE NO. 2DRC-22-0000043)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On November 16, 2022, self-represented DefendantAppellant David K. Braxton (Braxton) filed a Notice of Appeal and

a request for the district court to waive the filing fee;

(2) On November 18, 2022, the district court denied the

request for a fee waiver; 

(3) The record on appeal was due on or before

January 17, 2023, but was not filed because Braxton failed to pay

the filing fee or obtain a fee waiver. Hawai i Rules of

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rules 3(a), 11(b)(2), 24;

(4) On January 18, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a

default of the record on appeal, informing Braxton that the time

to docket the appeal had expired, Braxton had not paid the filing

fee or obtained an order allowing Braxton to proceed on appeal in

forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's

attention on January 30, 2023, for action that may include

dismissal of the appeal, and Braxton could seek relief from

default by motion;

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000696

19-MAY-2023

08:38 AM

Dkt. 14 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) Braxton took no further action in this appeal; and 

(6) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on

appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay 

the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to

proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 19, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sean Dave Harris

v. Civil No. 09-cv-20- JL

Janet Napolitano, et al.

O R D E R

On January 16, 2009, the above captioned case was filed in this Court. On January 20, 2009,

Attorney Michael Sady filed an Appearance and a Motion to Dismiss on behalf of all defendants.

Attorney Seth Aframe has filed an Appearance as replacement counsel on behalf of the federal

defendants in this case. Attorney Sady has filed a Notice of Attorney Withdrawal on behalf of

Wanye Estes.

Local Rule 83.6 states in part that an attorney may withdraw from a case by serving notice

of withdrawal . . . if (1) there are no motions pending before the court . . . As Document Number

1, the Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

is pending in this court, Attorney Sady would only be able to withdraw by leave of court after the

filing of a motion. 

As Attorney Sady, being a government attorney, did not originally have the authority to

represent a non federal government entity, I herewith allow his withdrawal.

Case 1:09-cv-00020-JL Document 14 Filed 02/06/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Respondent Wayne Estes, is herewith directed to advise this court by February 26, 2009, of

the name of a new attorney or, in the alternative, of his decision to appear pro se (without counsel).

See Local Rule 83.6(b) and (d). Mr. Estes is under no obligation to retain counsel; he may defend

this case himself.

If no new appearance or other response is received within the time specified, the file will be

referred to the clerk for entry of the default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).

SO ORDERED.

February 6, 2009 _________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Soraya Sadeghi, Esq.

Seth Aframe, Esq.

Michael Sady, Esq.

Wayne Estes, Sheriff, Strafford County Jail 

Case 1:09-cv-00020-JL Document 14 Filed 02/06/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND ASAY,

SAMUEL VIDAL GOMEZ,

JERRY LEE RHEA,

DENNIS GLENN COEN,

HEATH ALLEN RUSSO,

LOUIE GEORGE SCHIMPF,

QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before Court on the Motion for Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal

Without Prejudice of Complaint Against Defendant Heath Allen Russo [Docket No. 59]. 

Plaintiff has agreed to the dismissal of its claims against Russo without prejudice. In

exchange, Russo has agreed to (1) voluntarily appear at depositions, hearings, and

trials in this case; (2) accept service by mail or electronic transmission of notices or

subpoenas issued by plaintiff for testimony at depositions, hearings, or trials; (3) waive

the territorial limits on service contained in Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure and any applicable local rules with respect to such notices and subpoenas,

provided plaintiff reimburses Russo for travel and lodging at a reasonable rate; and (4)

consent to personal jurisdiction in any United States District Court for purposes of

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 60 Filed 12/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

enforcing any such subpoena. Wherefore, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Heath Allen Russo are

dismissed without prejudice.

DATED December 12, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 60 Filed 12/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-CR-000355-MK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

Defendant,

and

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,

Garnishee.

GARNISHEE ORDER

On motion of the United States, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that Garnishee, Alaska Airlines, Inc. shall pay to the United States funds 

from the 401k account belonging to Defendant John Phillip Gallegos.

Payment Instructions: Checks shall be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court 

and mailed to:

Clerk of the Court

901 19th Street, A-105

Denver, CO 80294

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 377-3 filed 07/15/14 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Please include the following information on the check:

Name of Defendant: John Phillip Gallegos

Court Number: 11-CR-000355

BY THE COURT:

Dated: _________________________ _____________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 377-3 filed 07/15/14 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending November 28, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF THE OZARKS INC                                                                                                  * 3A5Bank of the Ozarks, Inc., Little Rock, Arkansas, to merge with Community & Southern Holdings, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire Community & Southern Bank, Atlanta, Georgia.Newspaper: 12/20/2015Federal Register: 12/21/2015
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2003: Q1... 6.7 6.6 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.0

 Q3... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.1

 Q4... 6.3 6.3 n.a. 6.1

2004: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 5.9

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.6 6.6 n.a. 6.3

 Q4... 6.8 6.8 n.a. 6.4

2005: Q1... 7.1 7.1 n.a. 6.6

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2003: Q1... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.5

 Q2... 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6

 Q4... 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2

2004: Q1... 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.1

 Q3... 7.4 7.4 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.0

2005: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.9 7.4

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6

 Q2... 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4

 Q3... 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.5

 Q4... 6.5 6.5 6.9 6.7

2004: Q1... 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.3

 Q2... 6.9 6.4 6.5 6.5

 Q3... 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q4... 7.4 7.0 7.1 6.9

2005: Q1... 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.2
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.3 6.9

 Q3... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 7.1 7.2 6.8

2004: Q1... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.7

 Q2... n.a. 7.1 7.1 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.7 7.3

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.9

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.4 7.1

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.6 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.1 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 6.5 7.0 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 6.5 6.9 7.3

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.4 7.1 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 6.8 7.2 7.1

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 7.4 7.8 7.7

2005: Q1... n.a. 7.7 7.9 7.8

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT  32.1


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and  (b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63  of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned  officer of Pizza Inn, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to
such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

     The  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 26, 2005 (the "Form
10-K")  of  the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained  in  the  Form  10-K  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods  presented  in  the  Form  10-K.




                                         /s/  Tim  P.  Taft
Date:  September  23,  2005          By:      Tim P. Taft
                                      President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                     (Principal  Executive  Officer)
                                      Director

     The  foregoing  certification  is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form
10-K  pursuant  to  Item  601(b)(32)  of  Regulation  S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether  made  before  or  after  the  date  hereof,  regardless  of any general
incorporation  language  in  such  filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000719152
<NAME> MEDAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                      9,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,394
<PP&E>                                          17,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,753
<BONDS>                                         21,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,805
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,813
<SALES>                                         34,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,813
<CGS>                                           25,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of August 28, 2019, is made by
and between Navios Maritime Containers L.P, a partnership duly formed and existing under the laws of the Marshall Islands (“NMCI”) and Navios ShipManagement Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation (“NSM”, and together
with NMLP, the “Parties”) and amends the Administrative Services Agreement (the “Management Agreement”) entered into among the Parties on June 7, 2017 (together, with the Management Agreement, the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given them in the Agreement. 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 In Section 1, Definitions, add the following definition: 



“Termination Fee” means the Cost and Expenses for the full calendar year preceding the termination date; 

 

	 	2.	 Section 10 paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows: 



“Term And Termination. This Agreement shall have a term until January 1, 2025 and shall be automatically
renewed for a period of other five (5) years, unless terminated by either party hereto on not less than one hundred and twenty (120) days’ notice if:” 
  

	 	3.	 At the end of the second last paragraph of Section 10, the following paragraph shall be inserted:



 If the Agreement is terminated on or before December 31, 2024, the Termination Fee is immediately due and payable
to NSM. 
  

	 	4.	 Full Force and Effect. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


  

	 	5.	 Effect. Unless the context otherwise requires, the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment shall be
read together and shall have effect as if the provisions of the Agreement, as amended, and this Amendment were contained in one agreement. After the effective date of this Amendment, all references in the Agreement to “this Agreement,”
“hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder” or words of like import referring to the Agreement shall mean the Agreement, as amended, as further modified by this Amendment. 



 

	 	6.	 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, all of which taken together shall
constitute a single instrument. 


 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page to follow.] 












 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the day
and year first above written. 
 NAVIOS MARITIME CONTAINERS L.P. 
  

	
	 /s/ Erifili Tsironi

	By: Erifili Tsironi
	Title: Chief Financial Officer

 NAVIOS SHIPMANAGEMENT INC. 
  

	
	 /s/ Vasiliki Papaefthymiou

	By: Vasiliki Papaefthymiou
	Title: Secretary/Director
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending August 18, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE                                                            * 3A3The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and acquire two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 09/17/2012CITIBANK, N.A.                                                                                                          InvestmentCitibank, N.A., Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Citibank Overseas Investment Corporation, New Castle, Delaware, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K, to make an additional investment in Banco de Chile, Santiago, Chile.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableELMIRA SAVINGS BANK                                                                                                     * BranchElmira Savings Bank, Elmira, New York to establish a branch office located at 2081 Lake Road, Elmira Heights, New York. (RSSD #4428059)Newspaper: 08/29/2012Federal Register: Not applicableHANA FINANCIAL GROUP INC.                                                                                               * 3A1Hana Financial Group Inc., Seoul, Korea, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 71.37 percent of BNB Financial Services Corporation, New York, New York, and indirectly, BNB Bank, National Association, Fort Lee, New Jersey pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and Section 225.15 of Regulation Y.Newspaper: 09/03/2012Federal Register: 09/07/2012NONGHYUP BANK                                                                                                           FBSEANongHyup Bank, Seoul, Korea, to establish a branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24 of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableORIENTAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC.                                                                                           * 3A3Oriental Financial Group Inc, San Juan, Puerto Rico, to acquire 100 percent of BBVAPR Holding Corporation, San Juan, Puerto Rico and thereby indirectly acquire Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 08/31/2012
skip to main navigation
skip to secondary navigation
skip to content
| What's New ·What's Next ·Site Map ·A-Z Index ·Careers ·RSS ·All Videos ·Current FAQs |  | SearchAdvanced Search |  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------|--|

| About |
|-------|
#### Dutrel E. BAKER v. J. C. CHANCE WELL SERVICE, Inc. (TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONN., Intervenor).

No. 3117.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

May 19, 1949.

A. Deutsche O’Neal, Houma, for appellant.

St Clair Adams & Son, New Orleans, Edmond L. Deramee, Thibodaux, for ap-pellee.

Elton A. Darsey, Houma, for inter-venor.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Thibodaux et al. and. Baker v. Sun Oil Company and Baker v. J. C. Chance Wells Service, Inc., La.App., 40 So.2d 761, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1992: Q2... 55.1 19.5 35.6 6.2 3.3 7.8 4.9 8.1 3.2

 Q3... 56.2 19.9 36.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 4.2 8.6 1.9

 Q4... 54.5 19.9 34.7 -2.9 -.2 -4.4 2.9 7.8 .2

1993: Q1... 52.8 20.0 32.8 -3.2 .5 -5.3 1.7 5.6 -.5

 Q2... 56.0 20.6 35.4 6.0 3.1 7.8 1.6 5.4 -.6

 Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21