alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 903 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 903

     Honoring the national contributions of the Missouri School of 
      Journalism in Columbia, Missouri, on its 100th Anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Mr. Hulshof submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Honoring the national contributions of the Missouri School of 
      Journalism in Columbia, Missouri, on its 100th Anniversary.

Whereas the Missouri School of Journalism (``the School'') opened its doors on 
        September 14, 1908, becoming the world's first school of journalism;
Whereas beginning with the publication of the University Missourian that day, 
        the School has exemplified its ``Missouri Method'' of hands-on training 
        at the multiple professional media outlets affiliated with the school;
Whereas the School's pioneering endeavors continued in 1921 and 1934 with the 
        awarding of the first master's and doctoral degrees, respectively, in 
        journalism;
Whereas the School's more than 20,000 alumni have become leaders in professions 
        throughout journalism and mass communication and in academe;
Whereas since its inception, the School has welcomed students from more than 79 
        countries around the globe;
Whereas the free press plays an integral role in our society, as a champion of 
        freedom and watchdog of liberty; and
Whereas the achievements of the School are a mark of pride for its students, 
        faculty, the State of Missouri, and the Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the Missouri School of Journalism in Columbia, 
        Missouri, on the celebration of its 100th Anniversary; and
            (2) recognizes the important contributions of the Missouri 
        School of Journalism to the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
#### CHAMBERS v. CHAMBERS.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Sept. 30, 1936.

John C. Sullivan, of Miami, for appellant.

Paul C. Taylor, of Miami, for appellee.

BUFORD, Justice.

The appeal brings for review a final decree in a suit which was instituted by the appellant under the provision of section 3196, R.G.S., section 4988, C.G.L., or section 3197, R.G.S., section 4989, C.G.L., for separate maintenance unconnected with divorce, and in which the respondent, ap-pellee here, filed answer in which he prayed affirmative relief by way of divorce.

The final decree adjudicated the equities to be with the respondent, appellee here. It canceled, annulled, and dissolved the bonds of matrimony. It denied the relief prayed in the bill of complaint and dismissed the bill.

The complainant in the court below filed notice of appeal and assigned error. The appellee, respondent in the court below, filed cross-assignments of error.

The record shows that the parties were married about June 5, 1935, and separated in the latter part of July in the same year. At the time of their marriage the appellant, complainant in the court below, was about 59 years of age, and the appellee, defendant here was 71 years of age. They each appear to have been set in their ways, and neither was willing to learn or adopt new habits and ways of living. Immediately after their marriage in Miami, Fla., they went to Laconia, N. H. After they had been there about 2 weeks, disagreements arose between them, and from then on, until they separated about the latter part of July, there was considerable disagreement, quarreling, and at least one fight. The evidence as to who was at fault is conflicting.

We think that the state of the record justifies the decree denying the complainant the relief prayed, but as we read the record there is not disclosed thereby substantial evidence to establish the existence of either of the statutory grounds of divorce obtaining in this state, and therefore the decree granting divorce to the appellee constituted error.

Therefore the decree, in so far as it denied the relief prayed and dismissed the complainant’s bill .of complaint, should be affirmed, and in so far as it granted divorce to the defendant as affirmative relief, should be reversed, with directions that a decree be entered accordingly.

It is so ordered.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2053 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2053

To prohibit offering homebuilding purchase contracts that contain in a 
   single document both a mandatory arbitration agreement and other 
contract provisions, and to prohibit requiring purchasers to consent to 
a mandatory arbitration agreement as a condition precedent to entering 
                 into a homebuilding purchase contract.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2001

Mr. Gonzalez (for himself and Mr.  Rodriguez) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit offering homebuilding purchase contracts that contain in a 
   single document both a mandatory arbitration agreement and other 
contract provisions, and to prohibit requiring purchasers to consent to 
a mandatory arbitration agreement as a condition precedent to entering 
                 into a homebuilding purchase contract.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Homebuyers Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--No person engaged in the construction of new 
houses may require a purchaser to enter into a mandatory arbitration 
agreement as a condition precedent to entering into a contract for the 
purchase of a new house.
    (b) Separate Documents Required.--No person engaged in the 
construction of new houses may offer a purchaser a contract for the 
purchase of a new house which includes an agreement on mandatory 
arbitration unless such agreement is a separate document which contains 
only language pertaining to the mandatory arbitration agreement. The 
separate document containing the mandatory arbitration agreement shall 
also contain the following statement: ``By Agreeing to Binding 
Arbitration You Are Giving Up Your Right To Go To Court''.
    (c) Arbitrator.--The mandatory arbitration agreement shall not name 
an independent arbitrator and shall contain a procedure that adequately 
guarantees the purchaser an opportunity to participate in the selection 
of an arbitrator which shall occur only after a dispute regarding the 
homebuilding contract has arisen.
    (d) Enforcement.--If any person violates subsection (a), (b), or 
(c), the agreement on mandatory arbitration will be of no effect.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21














































                                                                 Page 120 of 125


<PAGE>



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent
corporation of 282 subsidiaries which operate "off-price"
retail apparel stores in the United States.

Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation,
which buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in
connection with the Company's business.

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation, which leases the Company's store in Clifton Heights,
Pennsylvania to one of the Company's operating subsidiaries.

Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates
a wholesale apparel business.

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an
interest in a manufacturer of coats.

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company
collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade
names.

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company
provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of
their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is an
investment holding company.

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.











                                                                 Page 121 of 125
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF MERIDIAN NATIONAL CORPORATION AS OF FEBRUARY 29,
2000 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                           3,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,032,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                   477,600
<INVENTORY>                                  4,287,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,243,456
<PP&E>                                       7,112,199
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,849,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,571,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,220,296
<BONDS>                                     12,269,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,175,320
<COMMON>                                        79,176
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,211,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,571,343
<SALES>                                     42,562,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,562,854
<CGS>                                       37,335,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,335,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (165,114)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,397,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,059,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,059,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,059,205)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 08-cv-499-SM

David M. Hulick

Caroline P. Hulick

Re: Document No. 38, MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of

Documents 

Ruling: Denied without prejudice. In light of the district judge’s order (doc. no. 42) dismissing

all of the Hulicks’ counterclaims except the breach of contract claim, the legal landscape has shifted

considerably since the Hulicks filed their First Motion to Compel (doc. no. 38). The motion is denied

without prejudice to the Hulicks resubmitting it, and including with any resubmission, an explanation

of how the district judge’s order impacts the precise interrogatory and document requests therein. 

Date: September 28, 2011 /s/ Landya B. McCafferty

Landya B. McCafferty

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Andrea A. Kafka 

Daniel E. Will

Joshua M. Wyatt 

Case 1:08-cv-00499-SM Document 64 Filed 09/28/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan W. Baldwin the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ALAN W. BALDWIN    
|Alan W. Baldwin        
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: December 12, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6652

THOMAS R. MORKE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ELLIS B. WRIGHT, JR., Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-94-42-R)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas R. Morke, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Thomas Morke noted his appeal on May 5, 1997 of

three district court orders. Morke’s appeal from two of the orders,

entered on November 5, 1996 and January 31, 1997, is untimely. The

time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R.

App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978)

(quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in

the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final

orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal

period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(6). Morke’s failure to file his notice of appeal as to

these two orders within the thirty-day appeal period or to obtain

an extension of the appeal period deprives us of jurisdiction to

review these orders. We deny a certificate of probable cause and

dismiss the appeal as to these orders.

Morke’s appeal of the district court’s order denying his Rule

60(b) motion for relief from judgment, however, is timely. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable

cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Morke v. Wright, No. CA-94-42-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 17, 1997). We
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending August 5, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodANGLO IRISH BANK CORP.,PLC                                                                                              FBSEANotification by Anglo Irish Bank Corporation PLC, Dublin, Ireland to establish a representative office in Chicago, Illinois pursuant to section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(B)(3) of Regulation KNewspaper: 08/24/2006Federal Register: Not applicableFIDELITY MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                         * 3A1
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                Estimated volume                 Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                              (percent)
                      _____________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3      Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1994......    |          69      10      11      15      33      .187      .026      .032     .037      .082
1995......    |          51      -2      14      13      25      .131     -.004      .039     .032      .061
1996......    |          95      16      27      24      30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6      19      19      50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4      15      24      45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37      35      36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17      34      45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53     140      48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50      58      73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35      48      58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17      46      38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8      16      12      24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
H. Res. 842 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 11, 2007. 

Whereas on November 15, 2007, Cylcone Sidr hit the coast 

of southern Bangladesh with 155 mile-an-hour winds that 

smashed tens of thousands of homes, damaged roads and 

buildings, and caused a 15-foot tidal surge that ruined 

thousands of hectares of crops; 

Whereas early reports have branded the destruction from Cyclone Sidr as the worst in Bangladesh in 16 years; 

Whereas the resulting damage from the cyclone affected more 

than 8,000,000 people through loss of their homes and 

livelihoods; 

Whereas over half of the affected internally displaced population are children; 

Whereas Bangladesh’s Disaster Ministry estimates that the 

cyclone damaged or destroyed 1,500,000 houses; 

Whereas the death toll from the cyclone stands at more than 

3,000; 

Whereas as the 4 districts in southern Bangladesh that were 

most drastically affected by the cyclone are Patuakhali, 

Bagerhat, Barisal, and Pirojpur; 

Whereas one relief worker commented that Bagerhat looked 

like a ‘‘valley of death’’ in the days after the storm; 
2 

•HRES 842 EH 

Whereas an entire island in Barisal, another district of southern Bangladesh, was submerged under at least 6 feet of 

water and houses were blown away by winds; 

Whereas the capital, Dhaka, which is located over 130 miles 

away from the devastated southern coastline, was also 

impacted by the storm, losing access to power and water 

for days; 

Whereas a massive tidal wave that was caused by Cyclone 

Sidr hit the Sunderbans, the world’s biggest mangrove 

forest that is home to the endangered Royal Bengal tiger, 

leaving a wake of death and destruction that have caused 

experts to declare the forest an ‘‘ecological disaster’’; 

Whereas officials at the United Nations World Food Program 

have appealed for international aid to help save lives in 

Bangladesh, noting that food supplies have been severely 

disrupted by the cyclone; and 

Whereas, due to the limited access to water supply and sanitation facilities that millions of Bangladeshis will face, 

health officials have warned against the possibility of 

cholera, dysentery, and other waterborne diseases: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses its heartfelt sympathy for the victims 

of Cyclone Sidr, which has affected southern Bangladesh; 

(2) conveys its sincere support to the people of Bangladesh; 
3 

•HRES 842 EH 

(3) supports the United States Government’s efforts 

to immediately make available all appropriate assistance 

requested by Bangladeshi authorities; and 

(4) reaffirms its commitment to provide relief aid to 

the victims as the effects of the cyclone continue to unfold. 

Attest: 

Clerk.