alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 209

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt

interest shall not be taken into account in determining the amount

of Social Security benefits included in gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that tax-exempt interest shall not be taken into account

in determining the amount of Social Security benefits

included in gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors Tax Equity

5 Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 209 IH

1 SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT

2 IN DETERMINING TAXATION OF SOCIAL SE3 CURITY BENEFITS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 86(b) of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social se6 curity and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘gross income—’’ and all that follows and in8 serting ‘‘gross income determined without regard to this

9 section and sections 135, 137, 221, 911, 931, and 933.’’

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Denise Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  February 14, 2011





/s/ Denise HawkinsDenise HawkinsChief Financial Officer
Third Department,

July, 2002

(July 1, 2002)

#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Jesse T. Wilkins, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 721]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this

Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court’s order dated November 20, 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (255 AD2d 827).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

*587Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercare, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-139-01-PB

Carl Connor

ORDER

Re: Document No. 64, MOTION to Appoint Counsel on appeal 

Ruling: Denied. Defendant must request the United States Court

of Appeals for the First Circuit to appoint counsel pursuant to the rules

of that court, which provide, in relevant part: Rule 46.5 (b) Appointment

of Counsel. The court may appoint counsel who represented the person in

the district court, or counsel from a panel maintained by the court, or

otherwise. The addition or deletion of names from the panel and the

selection of counsel shall be the sole and exclusive responsibility of

the court but the actual administration thereof may be conducted by the

clerk of this court. The person may ask for appointment of counsel who

represented the defendant in the district court or for the nonappointment

of such counsel, but shall not otherwise request any specific individual.

The court shall give consideration to such request, but shall not be

bound by it. A request for relief by trial counsel, upon a showing of

cause, shall be given due consideration. It is recognized that counsel

on appeal may require different qualifications than for trial. The

substitution of counsel on appeal shall not in any way reflect upon the

ability or upon the conduct of prior counsel. The Administration Office

shall be notified promptly of each appointment, and of each order

releasing counsel. As a convenience only, the Clerk shall forward

defendant's motion to the Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the

First Circuit. 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

U.S. District Judge

Date: February 18, 2010

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cr-00139-PB Document 67 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson (publ) (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated April 26, 2017



/s/ Carl MellanderCarl Mellander
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Jeffrey Paul Ferland

Criminal No. 06-cr-225-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

9) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: January 19, 2007

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Jennifer Cole Davis, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00225-JD Document 10 Filed 01/19/07 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:08-cv-00428-PB Document 1-9 Filed 10/20/08 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending November 24, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFNB BANCORP                                                                                                             CICNotice by Thomas Galt Atwood, Glen Ellen, California, and Cypress Abbey Company, Colma, California, to retain 10 percent or more of the outstanding shares of capital stock of FNB Bancorp, and thereby indirectly retain 10 perent or more of the voting shares of First National Bank of Northern California, both of South San Francisco, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/30/2012MALAGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                            CICNotice of Change in Control by Barbara Marie Kershaw, Newport Beach, California, to retain her controlling interest of approximately 17.1% of the voting common stock of Malaga Financial Corporation and thereby indirectly Malaga Bank, FSB, both of Palos Verdes Estates, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/21/2012RBB BANCORP                                                                                                             CICInteragency Notice of Change in Control by Dr. Ruey Chry Kao, Je Tsu Kao, Daniel J. Kao & Linda Lee Kao, Christina Koa, Min-Hwan Kao & Yu-Fan C. Kao and related family members all of Las Vegas, Nevada, to acquire 10 percent or more of the voting shares of RBB Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Royal Business Bank, both of Los Angeles, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableRBB BANCORP                                                                                                             CICInteragency Notice of Change in Control by Louis C. Chang, Su Cheng C. Chang, Peter Chang, Ellen Chang, and related family members all of  Los Alamitos, California, to retain 10 percent or more of the voting shares of RBB Bancorp and thereby indirectly retain 10 percent or more of the voting shares of Royal Business Bank, both of  Los Angeles, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Factory Card and Party Outlet Corp.
Naperville, Illinois

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Factory Card and Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary as of November 2, 2002
(Successor Company balance sheet), and the related condensed consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for the three month and seven month
periods ended November 2, 2002 (Successor Company operations), and the two month
period ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company operations). These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to such condensed consolidated financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

As discussed in Note 10, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements for the two month period ended April 6, 2002 (Predecessor Company
operations) have been restated.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
December 9, 2002 (March 5, 2003 as to the effect of the
restatement described in Note 10)
EXHIBIT 21

MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2007



|                                               |  |                           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Name                                           |  | Country                   
|MSC International Company                      |  | U.S.A. (California)       
|MSC.Software Australia Pty Ltd.                |  | Australia                 
|MSC.Software Asia Pty Ltd.                     |  | Australia                 
|MSC.Brasil Software e Engenharia Ltda.         |  | Brazil                    
|MSC.Software Ltd.                              |  | Canada                    
|MSC.Software s.r.o.                            |  | Czech Republic            
|MSC.Software SARL                              |  | France                    
|MSC.Software GmbH                              |  | Germany                   
|MSC.Software S.r.l.                            |  | Italy                     
|MSC.Software Corporation India Private Limited |  | India                     
|MSC.Software Ltd.                              |  | Japan                     
|MSC.Software Korea Corporation                 |  | Korea                     
|Compumod Sdn. Bhd.                             |  | Malaysia                  
|MSC.Software Benelux B.V.                      |  | Netherlands               
|MSC.Software AS                                |  | Norway                    
|MSC.Software Sp. zo.o                          |  | Poland                    
|MSC (Beijing) Technical Service Co., Ltd.      |  | Peoples Republic of China
|OOO MSC Software RUS                         |  | Russian Federation        
|MSC.Software (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.             |  | Singapore                 
|MSC.Software Simulating Reality, S.A.          |  | Spain                     
|MSC.Software Sweden A.B.                       |  | Sweden                    
|MSC.Software Limited                           |  | United Kingdom
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q2... 10 39 51 4 55 41 7 5

 Q3... 2 32 66 2 50 48 5 4 Q4... 2 12 86 2 28 71 2 22008: Q1... 0 10 90 0 32 68 1 1 Q2... 6 17 77 6 27 67 6 2 Q3... 10 30 60 7 37 57 11 3 Q4... 46 23 31 26 46 27 35 32009: Q1... 58 27 15 37 42 21 54 2 Q2... 41 42 17 29 57 15 43 4

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q2... 13 49 39 7 55 38 12 5

 Q3... 6 38 56 5 52 44 8 5 Q4... 7 25 68 5 47 48 7 32008: Q1... 7 25 68 5 36 59 7 3 Q2... 8 35 57 8 40 51 12 4 Q3... 10 35 55 6 42 52 13 4 Q4... 36 36 29 31 45 24 42 32009: Q1... 48 38 14 46 42 13 57 3 Q2... 41 47 12 32 58 11 47 4

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2007: Q2... 10 15 75 5 70 25 10 4

 Q3... 5 11 84 5 53 42 5 2 Q4... 5 0 95 11 42 47 11 22008: Q1... 5 29 67 10 43 48 14 2 Q2... 10 19 71 19 29 52 14 3 Q3... 16 37 47 22 39 39 16 4 Q4... 50 17 33 61 22 17 72 22009: Q1... 71 29 0 59 35 6 75 1 Q2... 65 35 0 70 30 0 70 2 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000718943  
<NAME>                             DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1982-1 LTD PARTNERSHIP
                                    
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                120,049
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          49,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      169,454
<PP&E>                             52,499,881
<DEPRECIATION>                     52,409,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        319,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  12,181
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                            253,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          319,181
<SALES>                               322,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      329,262
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         249,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        80,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    80,002
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           80,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            7.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        
 

</TABLE>
Order filed August 12, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00102

- CR

SEDRICK DOMONIQUE HA YWOOD , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 1258266



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit s # 30 and #31.

The clerk of the 176th District Court is directed to deliver t o the Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibi t s # 30 and #31, on or before August 19, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspe ction; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of
State's Exhibit s # 30 and #31, to the clerk of the 176th District Court.

PER CURIAM
H. Res. 984 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 14, 2008. 

Whereas pioneering men and women, known as cowboys, 

helped establish the American West; 

Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, 

compassion, respect, a strong work ethic, and patriotism; 

Whereas the cowboy spirit exemplifies strength of character, 

sound family values, and good common sense; 

Whereas the cowboy archetype transcends ethnicity, gender, 

geographic boundaries, and political affiliation; 

Whereas the cowboy is an excellent steward of the land and 

its creatures; 

Whereas the cowboy lives off the land and works to protect 

and enhance the environment; 

Whereas cowboy traditions have been part of the American 

culture for generations; 

Whereas the cowboy continues to be an important part of the 

economy, through the work of approximately 727,000 

ranchers in all 50 States, and contributes to the wellbeing of nearly every county in the Nation; 

Whereas annual attendance at professional and working 

ranch rodeo events exceeds 27,000,000 fans, and the 

rodeo is the 7th most watched sport in the Nation; 
2 

•HRES 984 EH 

Whereas membership and participation in rodeo and other organizations that promote and encompass the livelihood of 

the cowboy spans race, gender, and generations; 

Whereas the cowboy is a central figure in literature, film, and 

music, and occupies a central place in the public imagination; 

Whereas the cowboy is an American icon; and 

Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys and 

cowgirls to their communities should be recognized and 

encouraged: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses support for the designation of a ‘‘National Day of the Cowboy’’; and 

(2) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2087 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2087

  To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
 Code, may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or 
  certified chiropractor, without supervision or referral by another 
                          health practitioner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2001

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
 Code, may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or 
  certified chiropractor, without supervision or referral by another 
                          health practitioner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employees' Access to 
Chiropractic Health Care Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH BENEFITS COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Section 8902(k) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting ``chiropractor,'' after ``nursing school 
administered clinic,'' each place it appears.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to contracts entered into or renewed on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```