alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than October 15, 2008.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta**                     (Steve Foley, Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:                

*1. James C. France*, Daytona Beach, Florida, to acquire voting shares of CenterBank, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of CenterBank of Jacksonville, N.A., both of Jacksonville, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 25, 2008.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E8-22930 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-88721, 33-2481, 33-18221, 33-32596, 33-32597, 33-44633, 33-67782, 33-67784 and
333-35787 of Gibson Greetings, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 16,
1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gibson Greetings, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1997.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 31, 1998



                                       45
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: August 3, 2017 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED 

JEREMIAH MEANS, *

 *

* No. 12-740V 

Petitioner, * 

 * Chief Special Master Dorsey 

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Amended Application for Attorneys’

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Costs; Reasonable Costs. 

 *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Donald P. Edwards, Law Offices of Donald P. Edwards, Atlanta, GA, for petitioner. 

Glenn McLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON PETITIONER’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ 

FEES AND C OSTS1

 One June 5, 2017, the undersigned issued a decision awarding petitioner and his 

attorney, Mr. Donald P. Edwards, a total of $75,879.08 in attorneys’ fees and costs. Decision 

dated June 5, 2017 (ECF No. 197). Judgment entered on June 7, 2017. On July 26, 2017, 

petitioner filed a supplemental motion for attorneys’ costs, requesting an additional $1,919.00 

for payment to petitioner’s life care planner, Ms. Charlene Butler-Raih. Petitioner’s 

Supplemental Application (“Pet. Supp. App.”) dated July 26, 2017 (ECF No. 202). Petitioner 

stated that his initial application for fees and costs inadvertently omitted Ms. Butler-Raih’s 

updated invoice for the services she provided from May 8, 2016, through September 21, 2016, 

which total $1,919.00. Id. Petitioner filed this supplemental invoice setting forth the billing 

entries for Ms. Butler-Raih for these dates. Pet. Supp. App. at 4. Respondent does not object 

to petitioner’s request for additional costs. Id. at 2. 

 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note 

(2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided 

by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any 

information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in 

substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the 

disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 

18(b). 
2

 The undersigned finds this additional cost is reasonable and awards it in full. 

Accordingly, she awards: 

A lump sum in the amount of $1,919.00, representing reimbursement for 

petitioner’s costs, in the form of a check payable to petitioner and his counsel, the Law 

Offices of Donald P. Edwards.

In absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the 

Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with this decision.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of 

notice renouncing the right to seek review.
#### Joseph P. Pomichter et al., Respondents, v Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[744 NYS2d 752]

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Sedita, Jr., J.), entered June 1, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr.,*155 AD2d 435, 435; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending July 17, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodC-B-G, INC.                                                                                                             * 3A3C-B-G, Inc., West Liberty, Iowa, to acquire an additional $5 million (only $200,000 from C-B-G, Inc. and the remaining from executive officers, directors, and shareholders which are considered to be acting in concert) of common stock, or up to 50.01 percent, in Washington Bancorp, Washington, Iowa, and thereby increase it's indirect interest in Washington Bancorp's subsidiary, Federation Bank, Washington, Iowa.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableCHEMICAL BANK                                                                                                           * 18C
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 11, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    RONALD J. BUSCHUR
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
H. Res. 869 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 13, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 69) making further continuing appropriations for 

the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes. All points of 

order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions of the joint resolution are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of House Joint Resolution 

69 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation 

of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 
2 

•HRES 869 EH 

SEC. 3. The chairman of the Committee on Appropriations shall insert in the Congressional Record at any time 

during the remainder of the first session of the 110th Congress such material as he may deem explanatory of appropriations measures for the fiscal year 2008. 

SEC. 4. House Resolution 839 and House Resolution 

850 are laid upon the table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02257-MSK-MJW

JAMES F. BLUM,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM CLEMENTS, in his official capacity as Executve Director of Colorado Department of

Corrections;

TRAVIS TRANI, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Colorado Department of

Corrections;

ANTHONY A. DeCESARO, grievance officer, Colorado Department of Corrections,

individually and in his official capacity;

LEE ROMANSKI, a member of the sex offender treatment team at Arrowhead Correctional

Facility, individually and in her official capacity;

DANIEL CLAUS, individually and in his official capacity;

S. MICHAEL DUNLAP, individually and in his official capacity;

BURL McCULLAR, individually and in his official capacity;

MARGARET HEIL, individually and in her official capacity;

DAVID TESSIER, individually and in his official capacity;

J.D. SCOLLARD, individually and in his official capacity;

CHRISTINE TYLER, individually and in her official capacity;

DANA KRAKOW, individually and in her official capacity;

BONNIE CANTU, individually and in her official capacity;

CHRISTINA MARQUEZ, individually and in her official capacity;

JENNIFER MARTINEZ, individually and in her official capacity;

LEONARD WOODSON, individually and in his official capacity; and

BRIAN KOCH, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN

EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS

IT IS ORDERED that, as to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary

hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and

Case 1:11-cv-02257-MJW Document 3 Filed 09/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60

days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The

Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will

be destroyed.

DATED this 1st day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02257-MJW Document 3 Filed 09/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
*Release Date: March 31, 2003*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

----

```
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 105  | 12                                     | 25                                                   | 36 | 32 | .319 | .037 | .078 | .103 | .091 |
| 82   | 14                                     | 20                                                   | 29 | 18 | .237 | .039 | .062 | .083 | .050 |
| 54   | 7                                      | 16                                                   | 5 | 26 | .155 | .020 | .049 | .014 | .069 |
| 69   | 10                                     | 11                                                   | 15 | 33 | .187 | .026 | .032 | .037 | .082 |
| 51   | -2                                     | 14                                                   | 13 | 25 | .131 | -.004 | .039 | .032 | .061 |
| 95   | 16                                     | 27                                                   | 24 | 30 | .240 | .039 | .070 | .058 | .071 |
| 93   | 6                                      | 19                                                   | 19 | 50 | .230 | .014 | .049 | .045 | .112 |
| 87   | 4                                      | 15                                                   | 24 | 45 | .198 | .008 | .036 | .051 | .095 |
| 126  | 18                                     | 37                                                   | 35 | 36 | .280 | .040 | .086 | .078 | .080 |
| 108  | 11                                     | 17                                                   | 34 | 45 | .259 | .027 | .041 | .075 | .098 |
| 308  | 67                                     | 53                                                   | 140 | 48 | .656 | .142 | .118 | .294 | .101 |
| 221  | 40                                     | 50                                                   | 58 | 73 | .471 | .085 | .114 | .124 | .157 |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

         GTECH CORPORATION PARTICIPANTS IN EXECUTIVE PERQUISITES PROGRAM


W. Bruce Turner

David Calabro

Jaymin Patel

Marc Crisafulli

Kathleen McKeough

Timothy Nyman

Larry Smith (terminated in January 2004)

Donald Sweitzer

Antonio Carlos Rocha (terminated in August 2003)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Michelle Olivieri

v. Case No. 08-cv-37-PB

United States of America

O R D E R

The government has filed a motion for an independent

psychiatric evaluation of petitioner, Michelle Olivieri. For the

reasons set forth in the motion, the court finds reasonable cause

to believe that petitioner may have been suffering from a mental

disease or defect rendering her mentally incompetent to the

extent that she was unable to understand the nature and

consequences of the proceedings against her or to assist properly

in her defense in the underlying criminal case, United States v.

Michelle Olivieri, Criminal No. 05-CR-069-PB. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 4241, 4247, and with

the consent of the parties, the court commits the defendant to

the custody of the United States Attorney General and the United

States Marshal shall transfer petitioner to the Butner Federal

Correctional Facility located in North Carolina or the Federal

Detention Facility, located in Miami, Florida, as accommodations

Case 1:08-cv-00037-PB Document 10 Filed 05/13/08 Page 1 of 2
2

permit, in order to conduct the requested mental evaluation by a

qualified psychiatrist. Counsel shall submit copies of all

available and relevant records to the facility where petitioner’s

evaluation is to occur. Following the conclusion of the

evaluation, petitioner shall be returned to the District of New

Hampshire by the United States Marshal.

Following such examination, the psychiatrist shall prepare a

report to be filed under seal addressing the petitioner’s

competency. This report shall also take into account any

medications the defendant was taking at the time of her plea

hearing on November 22, 2005 and sentencing on February 17, 2006. 

It is also ordered that no statement made by petitioner

during the course of the above-described examination shall be

admissible against her on the issue of guilt or innocence in any

criminal proceeding.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

U. S. District Judge

May 13, 2008

cc: Glenn Geiger, Esq.

Aixa Maldonado-Quinones, Esq.

United States Marshal 

United States Probation

Case 1:08-cv-00037-PB Document 10 Filed 05/13/08 Page 2 of 2
DLD

- 090 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 19

- 3992

___________ IN RE: RAHMAN R. FULTON , Petitioner

____________________________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey ( Related to D.N.J. Crim. No. 2

- 13

- cr - 00261 & Civ. No. 2

- 18

- cv - 16526 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21

January 16, 2020 Before : RESTREPO, PORTER, and NYGAARD , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : January 27, 2020 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Rahman Fulton seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on a motion he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. By order en tered on January 13, 2020 , the District Court denied h is motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability . In light of the District Court’s action, Fulton’s mandamus petition no

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full C ourt and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). If Fulton wishes to seek appellate review of the District Court’s decision with respect to his § 2255 motion, he should file a notice of appeal in the District Court within the time period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B).
#### The American Ship Building Co. *v.*Aros.

(No. 24507

— Decided April 11, 1934.)

*Mr. Fred M. Secrest,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Levin <& Levin,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed, and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is affirmed, upon the ground that the injuries for which compensation was sought by the defendant in error under the Workmen’s Compensation. Act were incurred in a purely maritime employment, which employment has direct relation to commerce and navigation, over which a court of admiralty has ■ exclusive jurisdiction. *State, ex rel. Cleveland Engineering Construction Co.,*v. *Duffy et al., Industrial Commission,*113 Ohio St., 579.

*Judgment of the Court of Appeals reversed and that of Common Pleas affirmed.*

Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 167 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 860 

[Report No. 110–488] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 1585) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military 

activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and 

for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military 

personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1585) to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 

military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1585) to authorize appropriations 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 860 RH 

1 for fiscal year 2008 for military activities of the Depart2 ment of Defense, for military construction, and for defense 

3 activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe mili4 tary personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other 

5 purposes. All points of order against the conference report 

6 and against its consideration are waived. 

7 SEC. 2. The House being in possession of the official 

8 papers, the managers on the part of the House at the con9 ference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on 

10 H.R. 3093 shall be, and they are hereby, discharged to 

11 the end that H.R. 3093 and its accompanying papers, be, 

12 and they are hereby, laid on the table. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 167 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 860 

[Report No. 110

–488] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

other purposes. personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for the Department of Energy, to prescribe military tary construction, and for defense activities of activities of the Department of Defense, for miliappropriations for fiscal year 2008 for military to accompany the bill (H.R. 1585) to authorize 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS