alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              425681
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1802508
<ALLOWANCES>                                        107150
<INVENTORY>                                        1438968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3560007
<PP&E>                                            11743593
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2390842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    15998864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             12652578
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              5258
<OTHER-SE>                                         1607071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      15998864
<SALES>                                           15957499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  15957499
<CGS>                                             10647010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     10831682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1525012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  664259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2939546
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2176226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 763320
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        419826
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.09
        


</TABLE>
#### Neil Cohen, Appellant, v Trudy Beers Cohen, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 42]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), entered June 30, 2005, which, in postjudgment matrimonial proceedings, denied plaintiffs motion for a declaration that the parties’ daughter is emancipated, and for a money judgment of $38,550 representing reimbursement of a portion of the daughter’s college expenses, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate so much of the order as denied a money judgment, and the matter remanded to the motion court for further proceedings in connection therewith, including a decision on the merits of plaintiffs claims that defendant breached the separation agreement by failing to contribute to the daughter’s college expenses and misappropriated money that plaintiff set aside for such expenses, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The parties’ separation agreement provides that “[a] residence at . . . college ... is not to be deemed a residence away from the residence of the wife [i.e., defendant] sufficient to constitute emancipation.” While the daughter’s affidavit submitted in support of plaintiffs motion may raise an issue of fact as to her present desire and intention to establish a permanent residence away from either parent, any such desire and intention is a far cry from actually having such a residence. Meanwhile, unchallenged evidence adduced by defendant shows that while the daughter resides off campus due to the unavailability of dormitory facilities, she continues to return to defendant’s home each and every school break and intends to find summer employment in New York. No issues of fact exist warranting a hearing into the daughter’s emancipation *(see O'Neill v O'Neill,*109 AD2d 829 [1985]). However, issues of fact do exist with respect to plaintiff’s claims concerning defendant’s college expense obligations. Defendant argues that such claims were included in the parties’ settlement of a prior Family Court child support proceeding initiated by defendant, but nothing on the face of the stipulation of settlement tends to show the claimed offset. Defendant also argues that her alleged misappropriation of money set aside for the daughter’s college education is belied by bank statements; if so, the bank statements should be made part of the record. While plaintiff could have raised his claims concerning defendant’s college expense obligations in the Fam*364ily Court proceeding, the motion court erred in holding that his failure precludes him from doing so now. We modify accordingly. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned,
Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 13, 2007

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 4.1

                               ROGERS CORPORATION
                   EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

                                 First Amendment

         Pursuant to Section 9.5 of the Rogers Corporation Executive
Supplemental Retirement Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 5,
2002, by and between Rogers Corporation (the "Company") and Walter E. Boomer
(the "Executive"), the Company and the Executive each desire to amend the
Agreement, as follows:

1. Effective as of January 1, 2004, Article One of the Agreement is amended by
adding a new Section 1.6 immediately following Section 1.5 thereof, as follows:

         "1.6 Employment Taxes. In addition to any other benefit payable
         pursuant to this Agreement, the Executive shall be entitled to receive
         an additional payment for each year, beginning after December 31, 2003,
         equal to the amount of the Executive's net out-of-pocket expenses
         related to any employment or similar tax which results from benefits
         accrued under this Agreement and any payment made under this Section
         1.6."

2. Except as so amended, the Agreement in all other respects is hereby
confirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to the
Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the Executive has
hereunto set his hand, each on this 29th day of April, 2004.



                                            ROGERS CORPORATION



/s/ Walter E. Boomer                        By: /s/ Robert M. Soffer
-------------------------------------------     --------------------------------
Walter E. Boomer, in his individual capacity    Robert M. Soffer
                                                Vice President and Secretary




                                     1 of 1
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... n.a. 8 16 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .035 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**     In connection with Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A tothe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Milacron Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), for the period endingDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to suchofficer’s knowledge and belief, that:     1. the Report fully complies, in all material respects,with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of December 31, 2004. By:     /s/ Ronald D. Brown           Ronald D. Brown *Chairman, President and* *Chief Executive Officer*Date: October 14, 2005 By:     /s/ Ross A. Anderson           Ross A. Anderson *Vice President — Finance* *and Chief Financial Officer*Date: October 14, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     This certificate is provided solely for purposes of complyingwith the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for anyother purpose and shall not be deemed “filed” by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certificate will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing, exceptto the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.
EXHIBIT 21.1

GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

GTA
GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA
LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf
Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in which GTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

SandpiperGolf
Trust, LLC, a California limited liability company

GTATierra
Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAOsage,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPalm
Desert, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABrentwood,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAManagement,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

Sandpiper
GTA Development, Inc. (dissolved effective 12/31/99)

GTASweetwater,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAWekiva,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTACypress
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPolo
Trace, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABlack
Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABonaventure,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPete
Dye, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAMystic
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAStonehenge,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTALost
Oaks, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAInnisbrook,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

---

QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 INTERWEST MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 USC 1350) The undersigned, Arch B. Gilbert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
InterWest Medical Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys current report on Form 10-K
(the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that: 
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 20th day
of January 2005. /s/ Arch B. GilbertArch B. GilbertPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02244-CMA-MJW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

RICHARD WILMER, and

ROCK WEISS,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff United States’ Motion to Strike Jury Demand

(docket no. 27) is GRANTED. The defendants do not have a right to jury trial under the

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§

9601-9675, as amended, nor is there a Constitutional right to a jury trial for the claims at

issue in this case. The demand for jury trial in Defendant Rock Weiss’s Amended

Answer (docket no. 24) is STRICKEN. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Pro Se Defendant Weiss [sic] Motion for Stay

(docket no. 29) is DENIED for the following reasons. This case is a CERCLA action

brought by Plaintiff United States against Defendant Weiss to enforce the government’s

police or regulatory power and therefore this action is exempted from the automatic stay

consistent with 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4). 

Date: March 14, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02244-RM-MJW Document 37 Filed 03/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Investments
Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Mark A. Nesci, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and











(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial position and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
August 29, 2008


/s/
      Mark A. NesciMark
      A. NesciPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### Cohen *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24912

— Decided September 26, 1934.)

*Mr. Herman H. Pinkie, Mr. Henry Galen*and *Mr. Irwin Fisher,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank T. Cullitan,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the *547reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, 0. J., .Jones, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
#### Curtis Lee MIKE v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit
10.1


 


Description
of Stay Bonus Program


 


The stay bonus program
was put in place by the Board of Managers as a means of retaining certain
employees as the Company announced it was pursuing strategic alternatives.  Thirty-three employees, including executive
officers of the Company, are eligible to participate for a maximum aggregate
payout of approximately $980,000.  Mr.
Robert A. Peterson, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
David F. Myers, Jr., the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, are not eligible to participate. 
Payments are triggered upon a change of control of NSP Holdings L.L.C.,
with change of control being defined as a transfer of 66 2/3% or more of the
voting equity of the Company or substantially all of the Company’s assets.  There is no written documentation of this
plan.  Employees are eligible to receive
between 1.5 and 5 months’ salary upon a change of control, with individual
awards determined by the Board of Managers.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending July 17, 2021

----

Testimony and Statements            Monetary Policy -- statement by Chair Powell before the House Committee on Financial Services on July 14 and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on July 15, 2021, on the semiannual Monetary Policy Report.            -Published, July 14, 2021            Bank Holding Companies            The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., New York, New York -- relief from certain commitments.            -Approved, July 13, 2021            Regulations and Policies            Credit Card Plans -- annual report to Congress on the profitability of credit card operations of depository institutions.            -Approved, July 6, 2021            (A/C)          
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
H. Res. 930 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 25, 2008. 

Whereas there are over 15,000,000 secondary and postsecondary career and technical education students in the 

United States; 

Whereas nationwide, there are over 10,000 secondary high 

schools and career tech centers and over 9,000 postsecondary institutions offering career and technical education programs; 

Whereas a competitive global economy requires workers 

trained in skilled professions; 

Whereas career and technical education plays a crucial role 

in preparing a well-educated and skilled workforce in 

America; 

Whereas career and technical education prepares students for 

all of the 20 fastest growing occupations identified by the 

U.S. Department of Labor; 

Whereas according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, nearly 

75 percent of employers report severe conditions when 

trying to hire qualified workers and 40 percent say that 

applicants are poorly skilled; 

Whereas students taking career and technical education 

courses have higher grade point averages in college, are 

less likely to drop out in high school and college, and 
2 

•HRES 930 EH 

have better employment and earnings outcomes than 

other students; 

Whereas, in 2006, Congress reauthorized with bipartisan support the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education 

Act, which provides states with Federal resources to support career and technical education programs; and 

Whereas the Association for Career and Technical Education 

has designated February as ‘‘Career and Technical Education Month’’ to celebrate career and technical education 

across the country: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Career and 

Technical Education month; 

(2) recognizes the importance of career and technical education in preparing a well-educated and skilled 

workforce in America; and 

(3) encourages educators, counselors, and administrators to promote career and technical education as an 

option to students. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW

SHAWN D. ALLEN,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

EDWARD SNEAD, 

ROBERT TUCKER,

RANDY ANDERSON,

BILLY BRUNELL, and,

JAMES MICHAUD,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff’s “Temporary Restraining Order or

Preliminary Injunction Rule 65(b) Affidavit.Motion” (Docket No. 12) is denied. The relief

plaintiff is seeking is not a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, but a

discovery order directing the defendants to preserve video recordings. The motion is

denied for the reasons stated by this court in a Minute Order denying plaintiff’s motion

for the same relief in another action brought by the plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-cv01424-CMA-MJW, Docket No. 45, which was affirmed by Judge Arguello on 

December 15, 2011 (Docket No. 55 in the other case). Plaintiff, in fact, notes in the

instant motion that he filed the same motion in the other case. (See Docket No. 12 at

1).

Dated: December 21, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW Document 17 Filed 12/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1