alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 934 

Congratulating the city of Baytown, Texas, on its 60th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas (for himself and Mr. POE) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the city of Baytown, Texas, on its 60th 

anniversary. 

Whereas Baytown is a city in Chambers and Harris Counties 

in the Gulf Coast region of the State of Texas; 

Whereas Baytown is located on the northern shore of Galveston Bay, between the San Jacinto River to the west 

and the Trinity River to the east; 

Whereas settlement of the area that is now Baytown began 

as early as 1822; 

Whereas among the settlers of Baytown was Nathaniel 

Lynch, who set up a ferry crossing that is still in operation today at the junction of the San Jacinto River and 

the Buffalo Bayou; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 934 IH 

Whereas many of the settlers played an influential role in the 

battle for Texas independence; 

Whereas in 1908, an oil strike was made beside Tabbs Bay 

and in 1916, the Goose Creek oil field became the first 

offshore drilling operation in Texas; 

Whereas in 1919, the directors of Humble Oil and Refining 

Company built a refinery in Baytown; 

Whereas this refinery would become one of the largest in the 

world, and an influential force in Baytown and on the 

course of World War II; 

Whereas the refinery produced over 1,000,000,000 gallons of 

aviation fuel during World War II and nearly half of the 

total butyl rubber production of the United States in 

1945; 

Whereas the city now known as Baytown was originally 3 

separate towns; 

Whereas the first of these towns was Goose Creek, named for 

a local creek whose name is still reflected in the area’s 

Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District, 

which dates back before 1850; 

Whereas Goose Creek was followed by the consolidation of 

the rival communities of Pelly in the late 1910s and East 

Baytown in the early 1920s; 

Whereas the ‘‘East’’ in East Baytown was later dropped because it was west of Goose Creek; 

Whereas after World War I, people had begun to discuss consolidating the 3 towns into 1; 

Whereas in 1947, the 3 cities finally agreed to consolidate; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 934 IH 

Whereas the citizens settled on the name Baytown for the 

new combined city, and Baytown as it is known today 

was officially founded on January 24, 1948; and 

Whereas Baytown continues to be a prosperous and growing 

industrial community, as the population has increased 

from 20,000 to almost 70,000 over the past 60 years and 

continues to grow: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the significant history of the 

3 Baytown area; and 

4 (2) congratulates the City of Baytown on its 

5 60th anniversary. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jeffrey N. Halas, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[746 NYS2d 71]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 13, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant, a porter and concierge at a hotel, was asked by an employee of one of the hotel’s tenants to assist her in picking up a mail bin. When claimant responded that he worked on tips, the employee complained to claimant’s supervisor. The supervisor, in turn, requested claimant to attend a meeting regarding the incident and informed him at the meeting that *704he would be contacted following the completion of an investigation. When claimant failed to hear from the hotel after two days, he resigned from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground, inter alia, that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

We affirm. It is well settled that leaving work in anticipation of being discharged does not constitute good cause entitling a claimant to unemployment insurance benefits (see, *Matter of Prusch [Shenendehowa Cent. School Dist.*—Commissioner *of Labor],*259 AD2d 877, 878, *lv denied*93 NY2d 816; *Matter of Chatterton [Enesco Imports*—Commissioner *of Labor],*253 AD2d 978, 978; *Matter of Shabbir [Sweeney],*242 AD2d 820). Here, claimant admitted that he left his job before the hotel had completed its investigation and did so to avoid being terminated. Therefore, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

United States of America 

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-16-04-JD 

Julia Tetreault 

O R D E R 

The joint assented to motion to reschedule jury trial 

(document no. 68) is granted; trial is rescheduled to the two-week 

period beginning January 20, 2010. 

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10 

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting 

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the 

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), for the 

reasons set forth in the motion. 

SO ORDERED. 

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

United States District Judge 

Date: November 2 , 2009 

cc: Harry Batchelder, Jr., Esq. 

Mark Zuckerman, Esq. 

U.S. Marshal 

U.S. Probation 

Case 1:09-cr-00016-JD Document 69 Filed 11/02/09 Page 1 of 1
#### NELL v. HOFFMAN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                       760
<INVENTORY>                                      3,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,795
<PP&E>                                          66,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,914
<BONDS>                                         62,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,840
<SALES>                                         90,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,763
<CGS>                                           51,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,050
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,657
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,526
<DISCONTINUED>                                (30,510)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,984)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 980 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 14, 2008.
    Resolved, That the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary is authorized 
to initiate or intervene in judicial proceedings in any Federal court of 
competent jurisdiction, on behalf of the Committee on the Judiciary, to seek 
declaratory judgments affirming the duty of any individual to comply with any 
subpoena that is a subject of House Resolution 979 issued to such individual by 
the Committee as part of its investigation into the firing of certain United 
States Attorneys and related matters, and to seek appropriate ancillary relief, 
including injunctive relief.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on the Judiciary shall report as soon as practicable 
to the House with respect to any judicial proceedings which it initiates or in 
which it intervenes pursuant to this resolution.
    Sec. 3.  The Office of General Counsel of the House of Representatives 
shall, at the authorization of the Speaker, represent the Committee on the 
Judiciary in any litigation pursuant to this resolution. In giving that 
authorization, the Speaker shall consult with the Bipartisan Legal Advisory 
Group established pursuant to clause 8 of Rule II.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                      NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                               March 31,   
                                                                        ----------------------
                                                                           1998         1997         
                                                                        ---------    ---------
<S>                                                                     <C>          <C>
Average number of common shares outstanding . . . . . . . . . . .           9,031       6,898

Common equivalent shares outstanding:

Stock options (1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              --          --
                                                                          -------      ------

Total common and common equivalent shares outstanding . . . . . .           9,031       6,898
                                                                          =======      ======

Net loss attributed to common shareholders  . . . . . . . . . . .       $  (5,172)   $ (6,173)
                                                                          =======      ====== 

Loss per common share (basic and diluted) . . . . . . . . . . . .       $   (0.57)   $  (0.89)
------------------------                                                  =======      ======
</TABLE>
(1)      Stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
         common share as the effect of such options would be anti-dilutive.





                                       29
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 7 (Thursday, January 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. EL08-23-000]


PPL Electric Utilities Corporation; Public Service Electric and 
Gas Company; Notice of Filing

December 31, 2007.
    Take notice that on December 21, 2007, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Rules of Practices and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.207, section 219 of the Federal 
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824s (2007), and Order No. 679, PPL Electric 
Utilities Corporation (PPL Electric) and Public Service Electric and 
Gas Company (PSE&G) filed a petition for declaratory order requesting 
the Commission to authorize specific rate incentives described below 
for a new 500 kV transmission line that will connect PPL Electric's 
Susquehanna 500 kV switchyard in Pennsylvania to PSE&G's Roseland 
substation in New Jersey.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31777463727e5f5d585f54624441415e434571575443521f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9adcdfc8d9d5f4f6f3f4ffc9efeaeaf5e8eedafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-231 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Community Bancorp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Community Bancorp. and will be retained by Community Bancorp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Louise M. Bonvechio


Louise M. Bonvechio, Vice President & CFO





March 29, 2010
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2






              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.












November 14, 2007                         /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                          Vice President and Chief Financial
                                          Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2123 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2123

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of payment 
    for funeral and burial expenses and plot allowance for certain 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2001

Mr. Terry (for himself, Mr. English, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Barr 
 of Georgia, Mr. Rangel, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Condit, Mr. Jones of North 
 Carolina, Mr. Owens, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. King, Mr. Frank, Mr. 
   Gordon, and Mr. Stupak) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the rate of payment 
    for funeral and burial expenses and plot allowance for certain 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF ALLOWANCE FOR BURIAL BENEFITS.

    (a) Funeral and Burial Expenses.--(1) Section 2302(a) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``$300'' and inserting 
``$500 (as increased from time to time under section 5312 of this 
title)''.
    (2) Section 2303(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by striking 
``$300'' and inserting ``$500 (as increased from time to time under 
section 5312 of this title)''.
    (b) Plot Allowance.--Section 2303(b) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``150'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``$500 (as increased from time to time under section 5312 of 
this title)''.
    (c) Indexing Payment Amounts.--Section 5312(a) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and each rate of monthly allowance'' and 
        inserting ``each rate of monthly allowance''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and each rate of allowance paid under 
        sections 2302 and 2303 of this title,'' after ``under section 
        1805 of this title,''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
individuals who die on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23104]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-920-1310-08; TXNM 107307, TXNM 107313]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Leases 
TXNM 107307 and TXNM 107313

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, 
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas leases TXNM 107307 and TXNM 107313 from 
the lessee, Southern Bay Energy, LLC for lands in Burleson County, 
Texas. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the 
rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margie Dupre, BLM, New Mexico State 
Office, at (505) 438-7520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affect 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16 2/3 
percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 
administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost 
for publishing this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all 
the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We 
are proposing to reinstate leases TXNM 107307 and TXNM 107313, 
effective the date of termination, December 1, 2007, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: September 25, 2008.
Margie Dupre,
Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.
 [FR Doc. E8-23104 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re the Commitment of Timothy Daniel

Renshaw

No. 06

- 22

- 00034

- CV Appeal from the 402nd District Court of

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 2018

- 452 ). Memorandum Opinion deliver ed by

Justi ce Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and

Justice van Cleef participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the ap pellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 9, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk