alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Deli              Du                                                                                                 |   |   |   |
| By:                Deli Du, Chief                Executive Officer and President (principal executive                officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                          |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Jianmin              Li                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
| By:                Jianmin LiChief                Financial Officer (principal financial officer and accounting                officer) |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-129-01-SM

Anthony Rabbia

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 45) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the May 2010 trial period. Defendant has file

a waiver of speedy trial. 

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 48 Filed 03/12/10 Page 1 of 2
Final Pretrial Conference or Change of Plea: April 19, 2010 at 1:30 PM 

Jury Selection: May 18, 2010 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 12, 2010 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

2

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 48 Filed 03/12/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 967 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 967

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Kingston (for himself, Mr. Wamp, and Mr. Wolf) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
263) to establish the Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall, without intervention of any point of order, consider in 
the House the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 263) to establish the 
Joint Select Committee on Earmark Reform, and for other purposes. The 
concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to 
final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the 
question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; 
and (2) one motion to recommit to be offered by the majority leader or 
his designee which may not contain instructions.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

             CONSENT OF BEARD & COMPANY, INC., INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Regarding:

      1)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1988 Stock
            Incentive Plan (File #33-38427).

      2)    Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Dividend
            Reinvestment Plan (File #333-02063).

      3)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Director
            Fee Plan (File #33-48031).

      4)    Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Main Line
            Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Agreements (File #33-50526).

      5)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1990
            Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan (File #33-59372).

      6)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Stock
            Incentive Plan (File #33-68800).

      7)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Elmwood
            Bancorp, Inc. Key Employee Stock Compensation Program
            (File #33-77358).

      8)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Amended and
            Restated Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with Donald E. Stone
            (File #33-77354).

      9)    Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to The Frankford
            Corporation 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan (File #33-82088).

      10)   Registration  Statement  on Form S-8  relating to the 1995  Employee
            Stock Purchase Plan (File #33-91572).

      11)   Registration  Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995  Management
            Stock Purchase Plan (File #33-91574).

      12)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Non-Employee
            Director's Stock Option Plan (File # 333-04281).

      13)   Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Senior/
            Subordinated Medium-Term Notes (File #333-25393).

      14)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Financial Trust
            Corp Stock Option Plan of 1992 (File #333-49325).

      15)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Financial Trust
            Corp Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan of 1994
            (File #333-49323).

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the above listed  Registration
Statements  of  our  report  dated,  February  28,  1997,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial  statements of Financial Trust Corp and subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 1996,  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
Keystone Financial, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                      /s/ BEARD & COMPANY, INC
                                     -------------------------

      Reading, Pennsylvania
      March 26, 1999

                                      
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


[PRAECIS LETTERHEAD]


 


 


March 29, 2004


 


 


Mr. William K. Heiden


10 Livingston Road


Wellesley, MA  02482


 


Dear Bill:


 


In accordance with our recent
discussions, this letter will serve to amend the letter agreement, dated as of
May 9, 2002, between PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED (the “Company”) and
you (the “Original Letter Agreement”) as provided herein.  Capitalized terms used but not defined
herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Original Letter Agreement.


 


From and after the date hereof,
you acknowledge and agree that (i) any options to purchase shares of common
stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company granted to you under the
Company’s Second Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan (as it may be amended
from time to time) shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable upon
the termination of your employment with the Company upon or after a Change of
Control if such termination would entitle you to a lump sum payment pursuant to
the terms of the Original Letter Agreement as set forth under the caption
“Change of Control Severance Benefits”, (ii) immediately upon a Change of
Control, the section of each Stock Option Agreement entered into between you
and the Company captioned “No Exercise of Option if Employment Terminated for
Misconduct” shall automatically cease to be of any force or effect and,
accordingly, no termination of your employment with the Company after a Change
of Control will be, or will be deemed to be, a termination for “Misconduct” for
purposes of any Stock Option Agreement and (iii) any Stock Option Agreement
entered into between you and the Company after the date hereof will include
provisions to the effect provided in clauses (i) and (ii) of this
sentence.  Accordingly, the fourth and
fifth sentences of the section of the Original Letter Agreement captioned
“Stock Options”, to the extent such sentences refer to future grants of stock
options, are amended as provided herein and shall be of no further force or
effect.  All other provisions of the Original
Letter Agreement are not changed hereby and shall remain in full force and
effect.


 

















 


Please indicate your agreement with and acceptance of the foregoing by
signing and returning the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter to Mary Beth
DeLena, Vice President, Legal.


 


Sincerely yours,


 


PRAECIS PHARMACEUTICALS


INCORPORATED


 


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Malcolm L. Gefter, Ph.D.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Malcolm L. Gefter, Ph.D.

  
	
   

  	
  Chairman of the Board and

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Agreed and Accepted:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ William K. Heiden

  	
   

  
	
  William K. Heiden

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date: 

  	
  March 29, 2003
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RODNEY TIMOTHY WEBB, )

DOC #S39427, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-3420

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 15, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and BADALAMENTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
                               Estimated volume              Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                            (millions of dollars)                             (percent)
                      __________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2     Q3     Q4     Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
1995......    |          12       0      3      6      4      .055     -.001      .011     .027     .016
1996......    |           7       0      1      2      4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1      0      3     14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3      0      5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3      5      7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3      8     14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9      5     17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6      5     16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6      8     14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1      5      2     10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2     11      4      0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2      6      1     12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-8-01/02-SM

Melissa Allen

Michael Guinier

O R D E R

Defendant Guinier's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 58)

is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file

a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 3, 2008. On the filing of such

waiver, her continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 59 Filed 02/26/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: May 22, 2008 at 4:30 PM

Jury Selection: June 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 26, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Jennifer C. Davis, Esq.

 Patrick Richard, Esq.

 Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00008-SM Document 59 Filed 02/26/08 Page 2 of 2
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT


     In consideration of the promises and covenants of Figgie International Inc.
("Figgie" or the  "Company")  contained  in the Amended and Restated  Management
Agreement  between the  Executive and Figgie  including the possible  payment of
twenty-four  (24)  months  of  severance  pay to  the  Executive  under  certain
circumstances,  the Executive hereby agrees that the Executive will not, without
the prior  written  consent of the Company,  for a period of two (2) years after
his termination of employment from Figgie,  directly or indirectly,  for himself
or for others, in any state of the United States or in any foreign country where
Snorkel Division is then conducting business:

     (1)  engage, as an employee,  partner, or sole proprietor,  in any business
          segment  of  any  person  or  entity  which   competes,   directly  or
          indirectly, with the product lines of Snorkel Division; or

     (2)  in  connection  with any  product  lines of Snorkel  Division,  render
          advice,  consultation,  or services to or  otherwise  assist any other
          person or entity which competes,  directly or indirectly, with Snorkel
          Division with respect to such product lines.

For the purposes of this Agreement, employment with the purchaser of the Snorkel
Division or the Company  subsequent  to the Sale of the Business Unit or Sale of
the Company,  as such terms are defined in the Amended and  Restated  Management
Agreement dated June 9, 1997 between  Executive and Figgie,  will not constitute
competition under this Non-competition Agreement.

     The Executive  understands  that the foregoing  restrictions  may limit his
ability to engage in certain  business  pursuits  during the period provided for
above, but acknowledges that he will receive  sufficiently higher  compensation,
benefits  and  severance  pay from  Figgie  than he would  otherwise  receive to
justify such  restriction.  The

<PAGE>

Executive  acknowledges that he understands the effect of the provisions of this
Agreement,  that he has had  reasonable  time to  consider  the  effect of these
provisions,  and that he was  encouraged to and had an opportunity to consult an
attorney with respect to these provisions. Figgie and the Executive consider the
restrictions  contained  in  this  Agreement  to be  reasonable  and  necessary.
Nevertheless, if any aspect of these restrictions is found to be unreasonable or
otherwise unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the parties intend
for such  restrictions  to be modified by such Court so as to be reasonable  and
enforceable and, as so modified by the Court, to be fully enforced.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Executive has executed this  Agreement as of this
9 day of June, 1997.



/s/ Richard A. Solon
----------------------------
Richard A. Solon
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2001: Q3... 8.8 8.7 8.1

 Q4... 7.9 7.7 7.2

2002: Q1... 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 6.8

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 6.4

 Q4... 6.7 6.6 6.3

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.4 6.1

 Q2... 6.3 6.2 5.9

 Q3... 7.1 7.0 6.5

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2001: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.7 7.6 7.1

 Q3... 7.5 7.4 6.9

 Q4... 7.2 7.0 6.6

2003: Q1... 7.0 6.9 6.4

 Q2... 6.9 6.8 6.3

 Q3... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2001: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a.

2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.7 7.6 7.1

 Q3... 7.5 7.4 6.9

 Q4... 7.2 7.0 6.6

2003: Q1... 7.0 6.9 6.4

 Q2... 6.9 6.8 6.3

 Q3... 6.7 6.6 6.1

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
#### Lee Ralph Stern, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 833]

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered April 28, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs opposition adduced evidence sufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the denial of a promotion for him by defendant City was due to a widespread discriminatory custom in violation of his civil rights (42 USC § 1983; *see Davis v City of*
      *324
      *New York,*75 Fed Appx 827, 829 [2d Cir 2003]). We note defendant did not submit a reply. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry R.  Steinberg,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of  Manchester
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended  October  31,  2002,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
     Commission (the "Report"),  fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 12, 2002

/S/ Barry R. Steinberg
----------------------
Barry R. Steinberg
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 954 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 12, 2008.
Whereas Luis Aguilar was born in El Paso, Texas, on November 26, 1976, to Luis 
        Aguilar and Cecilia G. Silva;
Whereas Luis Aguilar resided in Somerton, Arizona, and is survived by his mother 
        and father, his wife, Erica Aguilar, his two children, Luis and Arianna, 
        his brother, senior Border Patrol agent Marco Antonio Aguilar, and his 
        sister, Angie Aguilar;
Whereas Luis Aguilar joined the United States Border Patrol on July 21, 2002;
Whereas on January 19, 2008, after over 5 years of dedicated service in the 
        United States Border Patrol, Luis Aguilar selflessly paid the ultimate 
        sacrifice in service to the United States;
Whereas Border Patrol agents carry out the vital role of protecting our Nation's 
        borders and ensuring the safety of the United States;
Whereas Border Patrol agents work devotedly and selflessly on behalf of the 
        people of the United States, without regard for the peril or danger to 
        themselves; and
Whereas the United States will forever be grateful for the service of Luis 
        Aguilar and mourn his loss: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and 
        women who have lost their lives while serving as United States Border 
        Patrol agents;
            (2) honors Luis Aguilar for his service as a Border Patrol agent and 
        for his sacrifice to the United States; and
            (3) extends its deepest condolences to the family of Luis Aguilar.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 208

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to determine and report to Congress

an appropriate tax incentive to encourage individuals other than members

of the Armed Forces to participate as members of honor guards at

funerals for veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to determine and

report to Congress an appropriate tax incentive to encourage individuals other than members of the Armed

Forces to participate as members of honor guards at

funerals for veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON TAX INCENTIVE FOR PARTICIPA4 TION IN AN HONOR GUARD AT FUNERALS

5 FOR VETERANS.

6 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall sub-
2

•HR 208 IH

1 mit to Congress a report setting forth a plan for an appro2 priate tax incentive to encourage individuals other than

3 members of the Armed Forces to participate as members

4 of honor guards at funerals for veterans.

Æ