alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2094 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2094

  To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) to 
           increase the contract amount specified in the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2001

  Mr. Ballenger (for himself and Mr. Coble) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of March 3, 1931 (known as the Davis-Bacon Act) to 
           increase the contract amount specified in the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(known as the Davis-Bacon Act) is amended by striking ``$2,000'' and 
inserting ``$100,000''.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135444 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135444 

 COA: 271844 

Isabella CC: 05-000059-FC 

FREDERICK TED SPENCER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
Case 1:07-cv-00093-PB   Document 24   Filed 02/22/08   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00093-PB   Document 24   Filed 02/22/08   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-00093-PB   Document 24   Filed 02/22/08   Page 3 of 3
#### H. L. MOORMAN, Appellant v. A. Edward HARNICK, doing business as Edward’s Art Galleries, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

July 9, 1954.

Rehearing Denied July 30, 1954.

George B. Carter, Orlando, Murray W. Overstreet and Ellis F. Davis, Kissimmee, for appellant

Thacker & Thacker, Kissimmee, and Richard W. Hobbs, Hot Springs, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The conflict in the evidence and the inferences deducible therefrom in this case were such as to require that the question of liability be submitted to a jury, and it was therefore error to direct a verdict in plaintiff’s favor.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

*677ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, HOBSON, and DREW, JJ., concur.

SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., dissent
**Exhibit 99.2**
**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
In connection with the Annual Report of Zemex Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lucie Brun, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to myknowledge:
     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Lucie Brun
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending August 24, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST BANK SHARES OF THE SOUTH EAST, INC.                                                                               CICAfter the fact change in control notice filed by Homer Lawton Johnson, Brunswick, Georgia; Jacquelyn S. Johnson, Alma, Georgia; Jacquelyn Lee Johnson, as co-trustee of the Zachary M. Johnson, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, Woodbine, Georgia; Ms. Jennifer J. Pope, as co-trustee of the Zachary M. Johnson, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, Macon, Georgia; Mr. Zachary M. Johnson, III, as co-trustee of the Zachary M. Johnson, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, Alma, Georgia; and Mr. Homer Jackson Johnson, as co-trustee of the Zachary M. Johnson, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, from Alma, Georgia, to retain a combined interest of shares and thereby control of First Bank Shares of the South East, Inc., and its subsidiary, FNB South (formerly known as First National Bank South), both of Alma, Georgia.Newspaper: 09/03/2019Federal Register: 09/05/2019IFB BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       3A1IFB Bancorp, Inc., notice to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of International Finance Bank, both of Miami, Florida.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
F OR P UBLICATION



### UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
E D W A R D H A R O L D S C H A D , Petitioner-Appellant , v . C H A R L E S L
. R Y

A N , Director, Ariz ona Department of Corrections,

Respondent-Appellee

. N o. 13-16895 D.C. No. 2:97-cv-02577- ROS
ORDER

F iled October 7, 2013 B efore: Mary

M. Schroeder, Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit J udg es.

ORDER J udg e Schroeder and J udg e Graber have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing a nd to deny the motion for a stay of ex ecution. J udg e Reinhardt voted to g rant the p etition for panel rehearing and to gr an t the motion for a stay o f ex e c ution. According ly , the petition for panel rehearing a nd the motion for a stay

of ex ecution are denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. WAUNITA WEINGART 

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS 

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART 

 Defendants. 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF RELEASE 

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendant John Phillip Gallegos’ 

Unopposed Motion to Modify Conditions of Release, and the Court having considered the 

motion and being fully advised, finds goods cause for granting the relief requested. 

It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 

1. Mr. Gallegos’ United States Passport, previously surrendered to and in the 

custody of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, be 

released to Mr. Gallegos or his counsel; 

2. Mr. Gallegos is permitted to travel to Alaska and Hawaii, and to 

destinations served by Alaska Airlines in Canada and Mexico for the purpose of work 

assignments by Alaska Airlines only; and, 

3. Mr. Gallegos is ordered to report to his supervising probation officer all 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 41 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
international flight assignments when such assignments are made, his itinerary, any 

changes to his itinerary that occur while on assignment, and to notify his probation 

officer immediately upon his return to the United States. 

DONE this 14th day of October, 2010. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 ____________________________________ 

 Hon. Marcia S. Krieger 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 41 filed 10/14/11 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Kevan D. Bloomgren, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
| /s/  Kevan D. Bloomgren |
|-------------------------|

Kevan D. Bloomgren

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 13, 2008
**Exhibit 21**

 

**List of subsidiaries of the Company:**

|   | UniFirst Holdings, Inc. UniTech Services Group, Inc.

UniFirst First-Aid Corporation UniTech Services Canada Ltd.

UniTech Services SAS

Euro Nuclear Services B.V. Euro Nuklear Services, GmbH Euro Nuclear Services Limited

UniFirst Canada Ltd. 

RC Air LLC

UONE Corporation Uniformes de San Luis S.A. de C.V. UniFirst S.A. de C.V. UniFirst Far East Limited |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2006...... 67.9 7.4 6.4 30.3 7.9 15.8 2.8 5.4 14.0 45.7 2007...... 64.8 5.6 5.6 32.5 5.5 15.6 2.7 5.7 14.8 41.6 2008...... 77.6 5.6 7.4 40.2 3.8 20.7 2.5 5.7 15.1 54.4 2009...... 70.9 6.1 5.0 40.9 4.3 14.7 2.5 5.4 14.8 48.2 2006: Q4... 60.8 10.0 6.1 24.5 5.4 14.8 2.3 4.7 14.1 39.7 2007: Q1... 69.6 5.9 5.3 40.0 3.5 14.9 2.3 4.8 13.4 49.1  Q2... 61.7 3.7 4.1 35.0 5.4 13.5 3.4 6.8 16.2 35.3  Q3... 53.6 3.3 4.9 23.9 7.5 14.1 2.6 5.4 13.1 32.4  Q4... 74.4 9.3 8.3 31.2 5.5 20.1 2.7 5.7 16.3 49.7 2008: Q1... 83.7 6.6 5.9 47.7 3.2 20.3 2.3 5.6 14.0 61.9  Q2... 76.7 4.5 6.3 39.4 5.8 20.7 2.9 5.6 16.5 51.6  Q3... 69.1 3.3 7.6 35.3 3.9 19.0 2.4 5.3 12.8 48.5  Q4... 81.1 8.0 9.7 38.5 2.3 22.6 2.6 6.1 17.0 55.4 2009: Q1... 96.4 5.9 5.5 63.8 4.8 16.5 2.3 5.3 15.9 72.9  Q2... 61.9 3.8 4.2 37.9 2.9 13.2 2.7 5.6 14.9 38.7  Q3... 55.9 4.4 5.5 29.6 3.1 13.3 2.7 5.3 13.5 34.4  Q4... 69.4 10.2 4.7 32.3 6.3 15.8 2.2 5.6 14.6 47.0 2010: Q1... 65.7 5.6 4.0 39.9 4.1 12.1 2.1 4.7 15.0 43.9  Q2... 68.2 4.8 4.1 34.2 5.5 19.6 2.7 5.7 15.8 44.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
**EXHIBIT 15**

TXU Corp. 

1601 Bryan Street 

Dallas, TX 75201

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financialinformation of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated November 9, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporatedby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-37652, 333-84418, 333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment No. 1 thereto and 333-115159 on Form S-3; and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671,333-62014, 333-92260, 333-105133, and 333-125169 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form S-8. 

We also are aware that the aforementionedreport, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and11 of that Act. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

November 9, 2006
[No. 34324.

Department One.

April 17, 1958.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Gerald T. Leckband*,*Appellant. 1

*Howard T 'Manion,*for appellant.

*Charles O. Carroll*and T. *Patrick Corbett,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 324 P. (2d) 254.

Per Curiam.

Gerald T. Leckband was charged by information with the crime of “Taking Motor Vehicle Without Permission op Owner.” The cause was tried to a jury, which found the defendant guilty as charged. From the judgment and sentence based upon the verdict, the defendant has appealed.

Appellant assigns error to the court’s instruction that the crime charged in the information constituted a felony. He contends that, since the information did not specify whether the appellant was charged under RCW 9.61.040 [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2659], the misdemeanor statute, or RCW 9.54.020 [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 260.1-1], the felony statute, the trial court erred in refusing to permit the jury to decide whether the appellant was guilty of a felony or a misdemeanor.

For-the-reasons announced in In re *Walder v. Belnap,*51 Wn. (2d) 99, 316 P. (2d) 119 (1957) (an opinion rendered by this court subsequent to the perfecting of this appeal), we find no merit in appellant’s contention.

*899The appellant was sentenced for a maximum term of twenty years. In *In re Walder v. Belnap, supra,*we held that the applicable-statute fixing the penalty is RCW,,9.92.010 [cf. Rem.,Rev. Stat., § 2265], which provides for a maximum imprisonment term of ten years.

The cause is remanded with instructions to vacate the judgment and sentence and to resentencé the appellant in accordance with the views herein expressed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending August 10, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST STATE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                            CICNotification by the Jennifer L. Wolgamott 2012 Legacy Trust, Cathleen R. Hefti, as trustee and individually, both of Scottsbluff, Nebraska; the Christie L. Coletti Christensen 2012 Legacy Trust and the Michael P. Coletti 2012 Legacy Trust, both of Greeley, Colorado; and the Kay Lorraine Hefti Coletti Living Trust, Kay L. Coletti and David C. Coletti, trustees, all of Cheyenne, Wyoming; to acquire control of First State Bancshares, Inc., parent of First State Bank, both of Scottsbluff, Nebraska, and Security First Bank, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableFIRSTBANK                                                                                                               * BranchFirstBank, Lakewood, Colorado, to establish a branch at 5885 West Bell Road, Glendale, Arizona.Newspaper: 08/15/2013Federal Register: Not applicablePREMIER BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                CICNotification by Norman W. Waitt, Jr., Dakota Dunes, South Dakota; Christopher M. Mayer, Omaha, Nebraska; the John S. Schuele Irrevocable Trust, Mary A. Schuele and Dana C. Bradford, co-trustees, all of Omaha, Nebraska; Todd P. Clevenger, Omaha, Nebraska; and the Dana C. Bradford IV Revocable Trust, Dana C. Bradford, trustee, both of Omaha, Nebraska; all as members of a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Premier Bancshares, Inc., parent of Premier Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska.Newspaper: 08/27/2013Federal Register: Not availableREGENT CAPITAL CORPORATION                                                                                              CICNotification by Dow R. Hughes, Tulsa, Oklahoma, individually and as fiduciary, to retain control of Regent Capital Corporation, parent of Regent Bank, both in Nowata, Oklahoma. In addition, notification by the following members of the Hughes Family Group acting in concert to retain control of Regent Capital Corporation, parent of Regent Bank, both in Nowata, Oklahoma: the Dow R. Hughes Revocable Trust, Dow Hughes, trustee; the Deanne D. Hughes Revocable Trust, Deanne D. Hughes, trustee; DRH, LLC; Dave Hughes; Michelle Hughes; and the David G. Dutton Living Trust, David Dutton, trustee; all of Tulsa, Oklahoma.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 08/05/2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                     INTEGRAL SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended                             Twelve Months Ended
                                                 September 30,                                  September 30,
           Basic:                   2001             2000           1999            2001            2000           1999
                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------
<S>                              <C>          <C>              <C>              <C>          <C>               <C>
Weighted average number of
common shares                     9,490,411       9,426,068      7,802,991       9,462,166       8,829,182      6,969,090
Income from Continuing
Operations                       $    $0.12      $    $0.08     $    $0.13      $     0.42      $     0.42     $     0.43
Income from Discontinued
Operations                       $    $0.00      $    $0.00     $    $0.00      $     0.00      $     0.01     $     0.03
Gain on Disposal of
Discontinued Segment             $    $0.00      $     0.04     $    $0.00      $     0.00      $     0.04     $     0.00
                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------
Net Income                       $     0.12      $     0.12     $     0.13      $     0.42      $     0.47     $     0.46

Diluted:
Weighted average number of
common shares                     9,742,545       9,598,615      8,331,158       9,672,833       9,283,546      7,422,601
Income from Continuing
Operations                        $    0.12      $     0.08     $    $0.12      $     0.41      $     0.40     $     0.40
Income from Discontinued
Operations                        $    0.00      $     0.00     $     0.00      $     0.00      $     0.01     $     0.03
Gain on Disposal of
Discontinued Segment              $    0.00      $     0.04     $     0.00      $     0.00      $     0.04     $     0.00
                                 -----------     -----------    -----------     -----------     -----------    -----------
Net Income                        $    0.12      $     0.12     $     0.12      $     0.41      $     0.45     $     0.43
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW

JACK DANIEL’S PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BEVERAGE RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation,

JAKK’D HOLDINGS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and

JACK BARRECA, an individual,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

The parties are actively engaged in “good faith” settlement negotiations. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Stay Litigation (docket no.

38) is GRANTED pursuant to Workman v. Jordan, 958 F.2d 332, 335 (10th Cir. 1992),

cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1015 (1995), and Pet Milk Co. v. Ritter, 323 F.2d 586, 587 (10th

Cir. 1963) (recognizing that the court has the inherent power to stay proceedings

pending before it and to control its docket for the purpose of economy of time and effort

for itself, counsel, and litigants). Discovery is STAYED until February 27, 2012. The

parties shall file with the court either a Consent Judgment or a Stipulated Motion for

Dismissal on or before February 27, 2012. If neither is filed, then discovery shall again

resume on February 27, 2012. 

 

Date: January 26, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 40 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
__________ 

__________ 

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT 

AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Cazario Marshall, Respondent, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2010-161448 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI 

Appeal from Allendale County 

Paul M. Burch, Trial Judge 

Perry M. Buckner, Post-Conviction Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-002 

Submitted January 24, 2013 – Filed February 6, 2013 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney 

General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy 

Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant 

Attorney General Suzanne H. White, all of Columbia, for 

the State. 
Appellant Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins of Columbia 

for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM: We granted the State's writ of certiorari to review the grant of 

Respondent's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the 

writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.