alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by
Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.             
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    TAKEO K. SASAKI                 
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Takeo K. Sasaki Chief Financial
Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (6), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, October 2, 2008 will be: 

Formal orders of investigation; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

A collection matter; 

Amicus consideration; 

An adjudicatory matter; and 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: September 26, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8-23048 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2019

No. 04-19-00572-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.G.C., JR., C.A.C., H.C., Z.C., AND J.A.C., CHILDREN,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-03-55745-CV

Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The appellants’ briefs were originally due to be filed on October 28, 2019. On October 

28, 2019, the appellants filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file their briefs.

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is 

required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. Id. 

The motion is GRANTED, and the appellants’ briefs must be filed no later than 

November 7, 2019. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further 

requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

SCHAWK, INC.

1.       Schawk Canada, Inc.

         a.       Stanmont, Inc.

         b.       Herzig Somerville Limited

         c.       Design Partners Inc.

         d.       Cactus Imaging Centres, Inc.

2.       Schawk de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.

         a.       Schawk Servicios Administrativos, S. de R.L. de C.V.

3.       Schawk GmbH

4.       Schawk USA, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of Schawk, Inc.)

         a.       Designer's Atelier, Inc.

         b.       Horan Imaging Solutions, Inc.

         c.       Inter-Process Service, Inc.

         d.       Intergraphx, Inc.

         e.       Schawk Japan, Inc.

         f.       Color One, Inc.

         g.       Schawk Asia, Inc.

         h.       LSI/Kala, Inc.

         i.       Schawk Global Enterprises, Inc.

         j.       Schawk (BVI) Holdings, Inc.

                  i.       Schawk (BVI) Services, Inc.

                  ii.      Schawk Labaun, Inc.

                           (1)      Laserscan (Sdn Berhad) (Company No.
                                    138179-A)

                                    (x)     Laserscan (KL) Sdn Bhd

                                    (y)     Laserscan (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

                                    (z)     Laserscan Flexographic Sdn Bhd

                                    (aa)    Laserscan Technology (M) Sdn Bhd

                                    (bb)    Tayo Laserscan Flexographic
                                            (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.



                                       48
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6054

COSMO THOMAS CAPORASSO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JAMES B. FRENCH, Warden, Respondent - Appellee, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-219-1, CA-99-220-1, CA-99-221-1) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John David Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS & WEAVER, L.L.P., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 19, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 22, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Cosmo Thomas Caporasso seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Caporasso v. Attorney General of North Carolina , Nos. CA-99-219-1; CA-99-220-1; CA-99-221-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### SPEED v. STATE.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00680-CV

ESTATE OF WALTER E. SNYDER, DECEASED

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-PC-3516

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 12, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Celia L. Classen filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
#### Mae SMOLLIN and Saul A. Laven, Appellants v. W. R. WILSON, Susie Wilson, and W. R. Wilson, Jr., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 24, 1954.

Walter Humkey, Henry Burnett and Fowler, White, Gillen, Yancey & Humkey, Miami, for appellants.

Nichols, Gaither, Green, Frates & Beck-ham, William C. Gaither, William S. Frates and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appel-lees.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is a death case arising under the wrongful death statute, F.S.A. § 768.01 et seq. The appellants admitted liability but denied that there could be any recovery on the part of W. R. Wilson, Jr., because he was not dependent upon the deceased and if he was dependent, then the amount of recovery was excessive.

The question of the dependency of W. R. Wilson, Jr., who was a one-armed man, was a jury question. It was properly submitted to the jury upon the evidence produced by the parties and under appropriate instructions. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury and the trial Court in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that there was no adequate evidence upon which they could base a verdict of dependency or that the verdict was excessive.

In cases of this kind there is no fixed and set formula by which the jury should be bound to a mathematical certainty.

The appellants claim that the Court committed error in permitting proof of funeral expenses because they were not specially pleaded. One of the appellees, W. R. Wilson, testified-that he had paid $860.50 for funeral expenses and offered to produce the receipts. The appellants objected to the introduction of such receipts. on the ground that they' were immaterial, and “it is an improper element of damages.” Appellants further stated as a part of their objection that there was no claim for funeral expenses and that “This is a dependency case”. Thereupon the attorney for. the appellees stated, “Wé ask the Court to amend the bill to include reasonable funeral expenses paid by these people as a part of this claim.” After argument, the Court stated, “I will permit them in.” This language of the Court is susceptible of only one interpretation and that is that the motion to amend the bill was granted and the receipts for funeral expenses would'be permitted in evidence.

This did not constitute reversible error. There was no surprise and it was within the discretion of the -trial Court to permit such amendment at any time before the case was finally submitted to the jury.

The appellants have failed to sustain the burden of showing any reversible error.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23





                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. of our report dated November 11, 1998,
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Span-America Medical
Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Span-America
Medical Systems, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-32896) pertaining to the Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.
1987 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-84374)
pertaining to the Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan of
our report dated November 11, 1998, with respect to the financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.


                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Greenville, South Carolina
December 23, 1998
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

MARTIN T. KNIGHT, § 

 § No. 193, 2016 

 Plaintiff Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below: Court of Chancery 

§ of the State of Delaware 

v. § 

 § C.A. No. 11355 

UPHAM DOWNS H.C., INC., § 

PETER S. MILLER, AND F. GRIER § 

WAKEFIELD, JR., § 

 § 

Defendants Below, § 

 Appellees. § 

 

Submitted: October 19, 2016 

Decided: November 2, 2016 

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

 This 2nd day of November, 2016, after careful consideration of the parties’ 

briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the 

Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s order dated April 

4, 2016. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the 

Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice
Attachment

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 6
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 148-1 filed 09/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 6
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending January 13, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment Period2013 MONTE HULSE FAMILY IRREVOCABLE TRUST I, THE                                                                        * 3A3Application by The 2013 Monte Hulse Family Irrevocable Trust I, Waco, Texas, to acquire up to 30 percent of FCT Bancshares, Inc., Waco, Texas, and thereby indirectly, First National Bank of Central Texas, Waco, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/29/2018INDEPENDENT BANK GROUP, INC.                                                                                            * 3A5Application by Independent Bank Group, Inc., McKinney, Texas, to acquire 100 percent of Integrity Bancshares, Inc., and indirectly Integrity Bank, SSB, both of Houston, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableTEXAS REGIONAL BANK                                                                                                     * BranchApplication by Texas Regional Bank, Harlingen, Texas, to establish a branch at 333 East Highway 290, Suite 350, Dripping Springs, Texas 78620.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,774
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,083
<INVENTORY>                                     11,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,375
<PP&E>                                         269,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 583,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,950
<BONDS>                                        220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   583,763
<SALES>                                        393,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,935
<CGS>                                          325,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                        52
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... 73 9 7 23 34 .146 .018 .015 .045 .064

2007...... 90 8 13 23 47 .170 .014 .025 .042 .085

2008...... n.a. 12 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .022 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1787-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1787-DR), dated September 5, 2008, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 18, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of New Hampshire.

Carroll County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036; Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

R. David Paulison,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-22947 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P