alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:11-cv-01737-LTB Document 4 Filed 07/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

   To extend the effective period of the consent of Congress to the 
 interstate compact relating to the restoration of Atlantic salmon to 
the Connecticut River Basin and creating the Connecticut River Atlantic 
               Salmon Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2001

  Mr. Olver (for himself, Mr. Simmons, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Bass, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Maloney 
of Connecticut, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, and Mr. Shays) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, 
 and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the effective period of the consent of Congress to the 
 interstate compact relating to the restoration of Atlantic salmon to 
the Connecticut River Basin and creating the Connecticut River Atlantic 
               Salmon Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONNECTICUT RIVER ATLANTIC SALMON COMPACT.

    (a) Effective Period of Congressional Consent.--Section 3(2) of 
Public Law 98-138 (97 Stat. 870) is amended by striking ``twenty 
years'' and inserting ``40 years''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Public Law 98-138 (97 Stat. 
866) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the 
Interior to carry out the activities of the Connecticut River Atlantic 
Salmon Commission $9,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 through 
2010.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23













































                                                                 Page 122 of 125

<PAGE>



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, , No. 333-41077,
No. 333-65995, and No. 333-78941 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated July 26,
2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Burlington Coat
Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended
June 3, 2000.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

August 31, 2000

























                                                                 Page 123 of 125

<PAGE>


                                                       Exhibit 27















                                                                 Page 124 of 125

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2199 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2199

   To amend the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government 
Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal law enforcement agency to 
    enter into a cooperative agreement with the Metropolitan Police 
  Department of the District of Columbia to assist the Department in 
  carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement activities in the 
    District of Columbia if deemed appropriate by the Chief of the 
Department and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government 
Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal law enforcement agency to 
    enter into a cooperative agreement with the Metropolitan Police 
  Department of the District of Columbia to assist the Department in 
  carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement activities in the 
    District of Columbia if deemed appropriate by the Chief of the 
Department and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Police 
Coordination Amendment Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADDITIONAL FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO ENTER 
              INTO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS WITH METROPOLITAN POLICE 
              DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Section 11712(d) of the National Capital Revitalization and Self-
Government Improvement Act of 1997 (D.C. Code, sec. 4-192(d)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(33) Any other law enforcement agency of the Federal 
        government that the Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department 
        and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia 
        deem appropriate to enter into an agreement pursuant to this 
        section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending November 11, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodDAKOTA FINANCIAL, INC.                                                                                                  * 3A3Dakota Financial, Inc., Marietta, Minnesota , to acquire 63.23 percent of the shares of Milan Agency, Inc., Milan, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Prairie Sun Bank, Milan, Minnesota.Newspaper: 12/02/2017Federal Register: 12/01/2017EAGLE BANCORP MONTANA, INC.                                                                                             * 3A5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven J. Huard

v. Civil No. 08-cv-120

Essex County Correctional

Center, et al.

O R D E R

The undersigned recuses himself from presiding over this

case. The case shall be assigned to another judge.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: June 3, 2008

cc: Steven J. Huard, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00120-WES Document 12 Filed 06/03/08 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending February 21, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodTRANS PACIFIC BANCORP                                                                                                   CICNotice by Dorothy Margaret Daly, Oak Brook, Illinois, individually and as executor of the estate of Denis J. Daly, Sr., or trustee of various trusts, to retain 45.6 percent of Trans Pacific Bancorp, Inc., and indirectly its subsidiary, Trans Pacific National Bank, both of San Francisco, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 02/04/2009
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending October 7, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAOB VENTURES, INC.                                                                                                      * 3A1Application by AOB Ventures, Inc., Edinburg, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Brush Country Bank, Freer, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/07/2017EAST TEXAS BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                             CICRetroactive notice by Lindsey Limited Family Partnership Number 2, Jasper, Texas, to retain more than 25 percent of East Texas Bancshares, Inc., Livingston, Texas, and thereby indirectly control of First National Bank of Jasper, Jasper, Texas, and First State Bank of Livingston, Livingston, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableGOLDTHWAITE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                            CICNotice by Robert G. Good, Corrales, New Mexico, to retain 10 percent or more of the voting securities and therefore control of Goldthwaite Bancshares, Inc., Goldthwaite, Texas; and Robert G. Good, M. Carolyn Good, Los Ranchos, New Mexico, the Good Living Trust/Family Trust, Los Ranchos, New Mexico, Cynthia Alysce Good, Andover, Massachusetts, the 2005 Natalie Grace Good Trust, Andover, Massachusetts, and Thomas Cody Graves, the Lisa L. Graves Heritage Trust, the Cody Clark Graves Heritage Trust, and the Debra L. Graves Bridges Heritage Trust, all of Goldthwaite, Texas, as a group acting in concert (the Good-Graves Family Group), to retain 25 percent or more of the voting securities and therefore control Goldthwaite Bancshares, Inc., Goldthwaite, Texas, which controls Mills County State Bank, Goldthwaite, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableSUSSER BANK HOLDINGS, LLC                                                                                               * SLHC FormationApplication by Susser Bank Holdings LLC, Corpus Christi, Texas, to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring and controlling up to 75 percent of the issued and outstanding voting shares of BancAffiliated, Inc., Arlington, Texas, and thereby acquire control of Affiliated Bank, Bedford, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/19/2017VERITEX COMMUNITY BANK                                                                                                  * 18C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000717374
<NAME> 82II.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         151,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,553
<PP&E>                                       8,420,466
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,327,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,456,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,439,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,456,326
<SALES>                                        598,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               695,912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  789,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (93,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (93,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,386)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (20.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1960

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exempt small public

housing agencies from the requirement of preparing an annual public

housing agency plan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2001

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to exempt

small public housing agencies from the requirement of

preparing an annual public housing agency plan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Public Housing

5 Authority Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY PLANS FOR SMALL PUB7 LIC HOUSING AGENCIES.

8 Section 5A of the United States Housing Act of 1937

9 (42 U.S.C. 1437c–1) is amended—
2

•HR 1960 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the

2 following new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(3) EXEMPTION FOR SMALL PHAS.—

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding para5 graph (1) or any other provision of this Act—

6 ‘‘(i) the requirement under paragraph

7 (1) shall not apply to any small public

8 housing agency; and

9 ‘‘(ii) any reference in this section or

10 any other provision of law to a ‘public

11 housing agency’ shall not be considered to

12 refer to any small public housing agency,

13 to the extent such reference applies to the

14 requirement to submit a public housing

15 agency plan under subsection (b).

16 ‘‘(B) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this

17 paragraph, the term ‘small public housing agen18 cy’ means a public housing agency that—

19 ‘‘(i) administers 100 or less public

20 housing dwelling units; and

21 ‘‘(ii) is not designated pursuant to

22 section 6(j)(2) as a troubled public housing

23 agency.’’; and

24 (2) in subsection (k)—
3

•HR 1960 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting

2 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon;

3 (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and

4 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A)

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively,

6 and by realigning such paragraphs (as so redes7 ignated) so as to be indented 2 ems from the

8 left margin.

Æ
Order entered March 24, 2104

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00313-CV

DR. JANINE CHARBONEAU, D.V.M., Appellant

V.

LOURDES HILL ZRINY, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-04035-2013

ORDER

This is an appeal from the trial court’s February 21, 2014 interlocutory “order regarding 

service on defendants.” It was filed March 10, 2014, within the twenty-day time frame allowed

for appeals from interlocutory orders. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.1.

Asserting the trial court has not yet “granted [her] the right to appeal,” appellant has filed 

a “motion for extension of time to accept amended notice of accelerated interlocutory appeal 

and/or notice of interlocutory appeal.” Because the appeal was timely filed, we DENY the 

motion as moot to the extent it seeks an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.1(b). To the extent the motion seeks additional time for filing an amended notice 

of appeal, we DENY the motion as premature because the time for filing an amended notice of 

appeal has not lapsed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(g).
 Although the notice of appeal was timely filed, we question whether we have 

jurisdiction over the appeal. Subject to a few mostly statutory exceptions, interlocutory orders 

are unappealable until a final judgment is entered. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Crop., 39 S.W.3d 

191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because it does not appear the trial court’s February 21, 2014 order is 

appealable, we ORDER appellant to file a letter brief of no more than three pages addressing our 

concern. The brief shall be filed no later than April 3, 2014. Appellees shall file any responsive

letter brief of no more than three pages no later than April 14, 2014. If either party relies on 

information not before this Court, that party must obtain a clerk’s record from the trial court 

containing that information.

After it has received the jurisdictional briefs, the Court will either (1) order the appeal 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction or (2) notify the parties that the Court has jurisdiction over the 

appeal and, if appropriate of any pending deadlines. Appellant is cautioned that failure to file the 

requested brief may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Goodson, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 874]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered March 30, 2004, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its rejection of defendant’s implausible explanation of how he came to make a written confession *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
#### Fulton, Supt. of Banks, *v.*Schuky.

(No. 24361

— Decided April 11, 1934.)

*Mr. John W. Brioker,*attorney general, *Messrs. Brown S Sanger, Mr. Sholto M. Douglas*and *Mr. Bert P. Hebenstreit,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Taber, Chittenden & Daniells,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed and judgment is entered for the plaintiff in error, for the reason that statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed, and under a strict construction of Section 712, G-eneral Code, presentation of a check for certification is not a presentation for “collection and payment”. *Fulton, Supt. of Banks,*v. *B. R. Baker-Toledo Co., post,*226.

*Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 0 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         777,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               888,321
<PP&E>                                         411,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,338,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,093,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,338,357
<SALES>                                        205,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          172,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,510,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,945,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,945,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,945,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)


</TABLE>
#### Broker *v.*New York Central Rd. Co.

(No. 24962

— Decided October 31, 1934.)

*Messrs. True, Crawford & True,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Graves, Duff <& Graves,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and tbe same hereby is, dismissed for tbe reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, 0. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending June 14, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE