alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Jemel Goode, Respondent.

[809 NYS2d 128]

Appeal by the People from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), imposed January 18, 2005, upon the defendant’s conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a determinate term of imprisonment of one year, to be followed by a two-year period of post-release supervision.

Ordered that the sentence is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for resentencing in accordance with the law applicable at the time of the defendant’s offense.

On November 16, 2004, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, based on conduct which occurred on August 2, 2004. The defendant was promised a sentence of an indeterminate term of imprisonment of one to three years. He appeared for sentencing on January 18, 2005. Accepting the defendant’s argument that he should benefit from the provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738; hereinafter DLRA), which had been enacted after his plea of guilty was entered, the County Court sentenced the defendant, pursuant to the new statute, to a determinate term of imprisonment of one year, to be followed by a two-year period of post-release supervision. The People appeal, contending that the defendant should have been sentenced, pursuant to pre-DLRA law, to the agreed-upon indeterminate prison term.

The DLRA sets forth a new sentencing structure for drug offenses *(see*L 2004, ch 738, §§ 20, 36 [adding Penal Law §§ 60.04, 70.70, 70.71]), and provides that the new structure “shall apply to crimes committed on or after the effective date” of the *724statute’s relevant sections (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]). Thus, the DLRA, while ameliorative in nature, expressly states that its sentencing provisions are to have only prospective application *(see People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861, 862 [2005]; *see also People v Festo,*96 AD2d 765, 766 [1983], *affd*60 NY2d 809 [1983]; *cf. People v Behlog,*74 NY2d 237 [1989]). Although the DLRA and subsequent legislation contain resentencing provisions which, in effect, permit the retroactive application of the new sentencing structure, those provisions apply only to defendants convicted of class A-I felonies *(see*L 2004, ch 738, § 23) or class A-II felonies *(see*L 2005, ch 643).

The relevant sections of the DLRA became effective on January 13, 2005, which was “the thirtieth day after” December 14, 2004, when the legislation was approved by the Governor (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]). Since the defendant’s crime was committed prior to the effective date of the new sentencing provisions, the sentence imposed upon the defendant pursuant to the DLRA was invalid as a matter of law, and the defendant must be resentenced under the law applicable at the time of his offense. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Andre Y. Fortier, President and Chief Executive Officer of Campbell Resources
Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year
ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Campbell Resources Inc.

Date: May 19, 2004.

                                  By: (s) Andre Y. Fortier
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Andre Y. Fortier
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending June 2, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodTRANS PACIFIC BANCORP                                                                                                   CICChange in Bank Control notice by Denis Daly Trust, UAD 12/24/12, Denis Daly, trustee, River Forest, Illinois; Daly 2017 Gift Trust, Dorothy Daly, trustee, Oak Brook, Illinois; and Eleanor Daly, an individual, River Forest, Illinois; to retain and acquire additional voting shares of Trans Pacific Bancorp, and thereby acquire shares of Beacon Business Bank, National Association, both of San Francisco, California. The foregoing trusts and individuals are joining a previously approved group acting in concert.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 06/14/2018
Case 1:11-cv-02271-LTB Document 2 Filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02271-LTB Document 2 Filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02271-LTB Document 2 Filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02271-LTB Document 2 Filed 09/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, David R. Jaffe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Dress Barn, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 22, 2003


/S/ DAVID R. JAFFE
David R. Jaffe
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02288-RPM-KLM

ELIZABETH HUDSPETH,

Plaintiff,

v.

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

_____________________________________________________________________

THE COURT having reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and being fully advised in the premises, DOES

HEREBY ORDER that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, with each party to pay her

or its own attorney’s fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

October 20, 2011

__________________ ____________________________________

DATE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-02288-RPM-KLM Document 12 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2007: Q1... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.7

 Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

 Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

 Q4... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.2

2009: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.1

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2007: Q1... 9.4 9.7 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

 Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 6.9 7.2 6.8

2009: Q1... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.8

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2007: Q1... 9.1 9.0 8.6 8.3

 Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q4... 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.9

2009: Q1... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.9 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.6

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2007: Q1... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 7.0 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.8 6.9

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1




---



##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 First Charter Corporation
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
 For the Calendar Year(Dollars in thousands)
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges:Income from continuing operations
before income tax expense
    
    $
    71,161
    
    
    $
    34,307
    
    
    $
    64,127
    
    
    $
    17,501
    
    
    $
    54,750Interest on nondeposit-interest bearing liabilities
    
    
    48,771
    
    
    
    46,266
    
    
    
    28,943
    
    
    
    28,946
    
    
    
    32,270Portion of rental expense deemed
representative of interest
    
    
    1,725
    
    
    
    1,089
    
    
    
    880
    
    
    
    674
    
    
    
    554Total income for computation excluding
interest on deposits
    
    $
    121,657
    
    
    $
    81,662
    
    
    $
    93,950
    
    
    $
    47,121
    
    
    $
    87,574Interest on deposits
    
    
    82,448
    
    
    
    53,456
    
    
    
    35,350
    
    
    
    41,544
    
    
    
    50,957Total income for computation including
interest on deposits
    
    $
    204,105
    
    
    $
    135,118
    
    
    $
    129,300
    
    
    $
    88,665
    
    
    $
    138,531Fixed charges excluding interest on deposits
    
    $
    50,496
    
    
    $
    47,355
    
    
    $
    29,823
    
    
    $
    29,620
    
    
    $
    32,824Fixed charges including interest on deposits
    
    $
    132,944
    
    
    $
    100,811
    
    
    $
    65,173
    
    
    $
    71,164
    
    
    $
    83,781Ratio excluding interest on deposits
    
    
    2.41
    x
    
    
    1.72
    x
    
    
    3.15
    x
    
    
    1.59
    x
    
    
    2.67
    xRatio including interest on deposits
    
    
    1.54
    x
    
    
    1.34
    x
    
    
    1.98
    x
    
    
    1.25
    x
    
    
    1.65
    xComponents of fixed charges:Interest:Interest on deposits
    
    $
    82,448
    
    
    $
    53,456
    
    
    $
    35,350
    
    
    $
    41,544
    
    
    $
    50,957Interest on nondeposit interest-bearing liabilities
    
    
    48,771
    
    
    
    46,266
    
    
    
    28,943
    
    
    
    28,946
    
    
    
    32,270Total interest charges
    
    $
    131,219
    
    
    $
    99,722
    
    
    $
    64,293
    
    
    $
    70,490
    
    
    $
    83,227Rental expense:Rental expense
    
    $
    5,175
    
    
    $
    3,267
    
    
    $
    2,640
    
    
    $
    2,021
    
    
    $
    1,662Portion of rental expense deemed
representative of interest
    
    
    1,725
    
    
    
    1,089
    
    
    
    880
    
    
    
    674
    
    
    
    554
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of HomeLife, Inc.'s (the "Company")
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2005 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
Cimerman, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        / s / Andrew Cimerman
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Andrew Cimerman
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Date: January 17, 2006
No. 72-6051.

#### Allen *v.*Cardwell, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

ACUSON CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Acuson Corporation has the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:

   1.  Acuson Pty. Ltd., organized under the laws of Australia.
   2.  Acuson GesmbH, organized under the laws of Austria.
   3.  Acuson Belgium SA/NV, organized under the laws of Belgium.
   4.  Acuson Canada Ltd., organized under the laws of Ontario, Canada.
   5.  Acuson A/S, organized under the laws of Denmark.
   6.  Acuson OY, organized under the laws of Finland.
   7.  Acuson S.A.R.L., organized under the laws of France.
   8.  Acuson GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany.
   9.  Acuson Hong Kong Ltd., organized under the laws of Hong Kong.
  10.  Acuson S.p.A., organized under the laws of Italy.
  11.  Acuson Nippon K.K., organized under the laws of Japan.
  12.  Acuson BV, organized under the laws The Netherlands.
  13.  Acuson A/S, organized under the laws of Norway.
  14.  Acuson Singapore Ltd., organized under the laws of Singapore.
  15.  Acuson Iberica SA, organized under the laws of Spain.
  16.  Acuson AB, organized under the laws of Sweden.
  17.  Acuson Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.
  18.  Acuson Foreign Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the
       Virgin Islands.
  19.  Acuson International Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the
       State of California.
  20.  Acuson Worldwide Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the
       State of California.
  21.  Sound Technology, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
       Pennsylvania.
  22.  Ecton, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of Delaware
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02286-REB-CBS

CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL CENTER, LTD., LLLP,

Plaintiff,

v.

VAL SIMONE,

Defendant.

FINAL JUDGMENT

This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in

accordance with all orders entered previously in this case; the verdict [#113-5] of the

jury; and the oral order entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn as reflected in the

courtroom minutes [#113] filed January 14, 2013, which verdict and order are

incorporated herein by this reference.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the plaintiff, Crossroads Commercial Center, Ltd., LLLP, did not prove by

a preponderance of the evidence all seven (7) essential elements of its claim for

misrepresentation;

2. That the plaintiff, Crossroads Commercial Center, Ltd., LLLP, did not prove by

a preponderance of the evidence all three (3) essential elements of its claim for

negligence;

3. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of the defendant, Val Simone, against

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 115 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
the plaintiff, Crossroads Commercial Center, Ltd., LLLP; and

4. That the defendant is AWARDED his costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the

Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 20th day of February, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 115 Filed 02/21/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-209-01-PB

Damon Anthony Lagrone

O R D E R

On March 5, 2009, defendant appeared for a “probable cause”

hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on three alleged violations

of conditions of supervision. Defendant waived the preliminary

hearing. I therefore find probable cause to hold him for a

revocation hearing. 

Defendant sought bail conditions under Rule 32.1(a)(6). 

Under Rule 32.1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of establishing

by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee and that

he poses no danger to any other person or to the community. It

is clear that given his drug history, his failures to report, his

failures to call in for drug testing, his lack of employment and

unstable living conditions, his risk of drug relapse prior to the

structure of a halfway house is enormous and he is a danger to

himself and the community. There are no conditions which are

likely to assure the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

Case 1:07-cr-00209-PB Document 15 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 2
2

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 5, 2009

cc: Jessica C. Brown, Esq.

 Jennifer C. Davis, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00209-PB Document 15 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending December 20, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending April 5, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOMERICA BANK                                                                                                           * BranchComerica Bank, Dallas, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 32022 Camino Capistrano, San Juan Capistrano, California 92675.Newspaper: 04/15/2008Federal Register: Not applicablePLAINS ACQUISITION CORPORATION                                                                                          * 3A1Plains Acquisition Corporation, Kingwood, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Plains State Financial Corporation, Plains, Texas, and indirectly acquire Plains Bancshares, Inc., Dover, Delaware, and Plains State Bank, Plains, Texas.Newspaper: 04/25/2008Federal Register: 04/28/2008WEST BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                   CICNotices by Ms. Laura Lankford, West, Texas; Mr. George B. Graves, Jr., Waco, Texas; and Ms. Sarah Lou Bracken, Waco, Texas, to acquire 37.04 percent; 27.93 percent; and 26.33 percent, respectively, of West Bancshares, Inc., West, Texas, and indirectly acquire Pointwest Bank, West, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/22/2008