alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
STATEMENT  OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS  ENDED JUNE  30,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               2,847
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       40,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (313)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    42,997
<PP&E>                                                 960
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (270)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      45,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,052
<BONDS>                                             12,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2,295
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                70
<OTHER-SE>                                          21,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        45,902
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,151
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5,789
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,442)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.36)
        
                                       

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending July 15, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIFTH THIRD BANK                                                                                                        * BranchFifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, MI to establish a branch at 2707 South 11th Street, Niles, MI.Newspaper: 06/23/2006Federal Register: Not applicableFIFTH THIRD BANK                                                                                                        * BranchFifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a limited-service branch at 1800 Riverside Drive, Columbus, OH.Newspaper: 06/23/2006Federal Register: Not applicable
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 26, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1164

Lower Tribunal No. 08-24995 

________________

Arturo Ortiz Soto,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian,

Judge.

Arturo Ortiz Soto, in proper person. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Arlisa Certain, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee. 

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ. 

SUAREZ, J.

Arturo Ortiz Soto appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for

postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, as well

as denial of his petition for habeas relief. We affirm as to both. 
Soto accepted the State’s plea offer to resolve four cases which were

pending against him, one of which was this case, F08-24995. In accepting a

negotiated plea, Soto effectively waived the non-jurisdictional issues he raised in

prior post-conviction motions and which he raises again here. See Haselden v.

State, 386 So. 2d 624, 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (holding the failure to timely raise

a defect in an information constitutes a waiver of the defect unless the information

wholly fails to charge a crime); Tracey v. State, 130 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1961)

(holding failure to allege an essential element of an offense does not alone render

the charge void as wholly failing to state a crime, and failure to timely object to

this defect constitutes waiver). See also Novaton v. State, 634 So. 2d 607 (Fla.

1994) (holding a defendant waives any double jeopardy claim that affects his

conviction or sentence by entering into a negotiated plea agreement wherein the

defendant agrees to each crime and sentence); Zaetler v. State, 616 So. 2d 461 (Fla.

3d DCA), rev. denied, 626 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1993) (voluntary guilty plea plus

agreement on sentence waived any double jeopardy objection as to convictions and

sentences). As such, we affirm. 

Affirmed. 

2
**Exhibit32**

 

ISONICSCORPORATION

 

Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

PrincipalExecutive Officer

 

To myknowledge: the quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, containing financial statements for the periodthen ended, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in theForm 10-QSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

 

 
| September  20, 2004                  |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
|                                 |
| /s/ James E.  Alexander              |   |
| James E.  Alexander, Chief Executive |
| Officer                              |

 

Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

PrincipalFinancial Officer

 

To myknowledge: the quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004, containing financial statements for the periodthen ended, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in theForm 10-QSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

 

 
| September  20, 2004                  |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
|                                 |
| /s/ John  Sakys                      |   |
| John Sakys,  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
*Release Date: December 31, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 8.9     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.0     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 8.9     | 8.8                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.8     | 8.7                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.7     | 8.6                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.2     | 8.1                    | 7.6                                |
| 6.9     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.6     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.8                    | 6.5                                |
||
| 9.1     | 8.9                    | 8.4                                |
| 9.2     | 8.9                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.8                    | 8.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.8                    | 8.2                                |
| 9.0     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 8.5     | 8.2                    | 7.7                                |
| 7.4     | 7.2                    | 6.7                                |
| 7.1     | 6.9                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.5                                |
||
| 9.3     | 9.3                    | 8.8                                |
| 9.4     | 9.4                    | 8.8                                |
| 9.2     | 9.3                    | 8.6                                |
| 9.4     | 9.5                    | 9.3                                |
| 9.1     | 8.9                    | 8.8                                |
| 8.3     | 8.4                    | 8.4                                |
| 7.5     | 7.6                    | 7.7                                |
| 6.6     | 6.8                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 7.3                    | 7.1                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# DATES AND TIME:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on October 9, 2008, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A.  Approval of Minutes

    - September 11, 2008.

### B. New Business—Regulation

    - Disclosure and Accounting Requirements—Proposed Rule— 12 CFR Parts 619 ,  620 , and  621 .

### C. Reports

    - OE Quarterly Report and Funding the Farm Credit System (FCS):

 ○ Financial Condition of FCS.

 ○ Funding the FCS.

##                     Closed Session *                                    

    - Supervisory and Oversight Activities of FCS Institutions.

Dated: September 26, 2008.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.

# Footnotes

*.                             Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-23077 Filed 9-26-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50057 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JESSE ROLAND FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-92-CR-69-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesse Roland Flores, federal inmate ##25755-138, appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We detect no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of the motion. Although the guideline amendments upon which Flores premised his motion are given retroactive effect, these amendments do not apply to Flores’ sentence. See Flores v. United States , No. SA-92-CR-69 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 19, 1996). This appeal is without arguable merit and thus is frivolous.No. 97-50057 -2- See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The appeal is DISMISSED. We caution Flores that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Flores is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00145-CR

TURNER PERRY TAYLOR,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20171417CR1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Turner Perry Taylor was convicted of Driving While Intoxicated and sentenced to 

180 days in jail. That sentence was suspended and Taylor was placed on community 

supervision-probation for 15 months. After a motion to revoke was filed by the State and 

heard by the trial court, Taylor’s community supervision-probation was extended six 

months from the date of the order. After another motion to revoke was filed by the State 

and heard by the trial court, Taylor’s community supervision-probation was revoked,

and he was sentenced to 170 days in jail with a $1,000 fine. We affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.
Taylor v. State Page 2

Taylor’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders brief in 

support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and 

that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the 

record for error and compliance with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude 

that counsel has performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. 

at 744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly v. State, 436 

S.W.3d 313, 319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2008).

In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the 

proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d 300 (1988); accord Stafford v. 

State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or 

"without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 

U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire 

record in this appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe 

v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial 

court's judgment. 

Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Taylor is granted. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Taylor v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Affirmed; motion granted

Opinion delivered and filed February 23, 2022

Do not publish 

[CR25]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHOTOFIXITPRO, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE 

CORPORATION,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 23-55548

D.C. No. 2:22-cv-08955-PA-MAA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 10, 2024

**

Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Appellant PhotoFixItPro, Inc. (PFP) appeals from the district court’s order 

granting Appellee Costco Wholesale Corporation’s (Costco) Motion to Confirm the 

Arbitration Award. While we generally have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as 

provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral 

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 14 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

1332, because PFP’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss for lack of 

jurisdiction.

Subject to narrow exceptions not applicable here, a notice of appeal must be 

filed within thirty days after the entry of the order or judgment appealed from. Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a). This “is a nonwaivable jurisdictional 

requirement.” Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., 476 F.3d 

701, 703 (9th Cir. 2007). PFP did not file the operative notice of appeal until 

ninety-five days after the entry of the relevant order and judgment, significantly after 

the thirty-day deadline.

While the notice of appeal was filed within thirty days of the order granting 

fees, requests for attorneys’ fees are collateral to the main action and so “a judgment 

on the merits is final and appealable even though a request for attorney’s fees is 

unresolved.” Int’l Ass’n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, & Reinforcing 

Ironworker’s Loc. Union 75 v. Madison Indus., Inc., 733 F.2d 656, 659 (9th Cir. 

1984). Nor did the motion for attorneys’ fees automatically toll the time to appeal. 

Such tolling occurs only “if the district court extends the time to appeal under Rule 

58,” Nutrition Distrib. LLC v. IronMag Labs, LLC, 978 F.3d 1068, 1073 (9th Cir. 

2020) (quoting Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A)(iii)), which the district court did not do 

here. We therefore lack jurisdiction to hear PFP’s claims.
3

The only order we have jurisdiction to review is the order granting attorneys’ 

fees. Although PFP appealed this order, it failed to raise any arguments regarding 

fees in its brief and so waived any objections to the fee order. Tri-Valley CAREs v. 

U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 671 F.3d 1113, 1130 (9th Cir. 2012) (“Claims not made in an 

opening brief in a sufficient manner to put the opposing party on notice are deemed 

waived.”).

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In connection with the Annual Report of The Dress Barn Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending July 26, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Armand Correia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
intended to be used for any other purpose.




/S/ ARMAND CORREIA
Armand Correia
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 22, 2003