alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending February 16, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFLATHEAD HOLDING COMPANY OF BIGFORK                                                                                     CICNotice by Lawrence W. Jochim Revocable Trust, Lawrence W. Jochim as trustee and individually,  Bigfork, Montana; Cindy Jochim and Richard Jochim, both of Bigfork, Montana; Todd Jochim, Lakeside, Montana; Lesley Jungers, Seeley Lake, Montana; Karla Langlois, Missoula, Montana; and Marcus Jochim and Beverly Jochim, both of Inverness, Montana, acting as a group in concert, to gain control of Flathead Holding Company of Bigfork, Montana, and thereby indirectly gain control of Flathead Bank of Bigfork, Bigfork, Montana. In addition, notice by Gib S. Nichols Living Trust and Sarah E. Nichols Living Trust, Gib Nichols and Sarah Nichols as trustees of each trust and individually, Vancouver, Washington; James Brendan Nichols, West Linn, Oregon; Shaun Nichols, Tuscon, Arizona; Norris D. Nichols, Helena, Montana, Karyl Arndt, Aurora, Colorado; and Roseanne Heser, Mahtomedi, Minnesota, acting as a group in concert, to gain control of Flathead Holding Company of Bigfork, Bigfork, Montana, and thereby indirectly gain control of Flathead Bank of Bigfork, Bigfork, Montana.Newspaper: 02/21/2008Federal Register: 02/13/2008LAKE PARK BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                              CICNotice by Lloyd O. Olson, Lake Park, Minnesota, to retain 10 percent or more of the shares of Lake Park Bancshares, Inc., Lake Park, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of State Bank of Lake Park, Lake Park, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 03/04/2008MILLS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.                                                                                           * 3A1Mills Financial Services, Inc., Brainerd, Minnesota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of First Security Bank - Sanborn, Sanborn, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 03/04/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE NINE MONTS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,022
<INVENTORY>                                     49,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,208
<PP&E>                                          80,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,071)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 402,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,071
<BONDS>                                        215,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   402,697
<SALES>                                         63,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,685
<CGS>                                           49,729
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,346
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (145)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,178)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
skip to main navigation
skip to secondary navigation
skip to content
| What's New · What's Next · Site Map · A-Z Index · Careers · RSS · All Videos · Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search |  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------------------|--|

| About |
|-------|
#### Thomas HENRY v. PERRILLIAT-RICKEY CONST. CO., Inc., et al.

No. 2502.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 17, 1943.

J. Elton Huckabay, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

Durrett & Hardin, of Baton Rouge, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

On joint motion of counsel for both the appellant and the appellees herein, in which it is made to appear that the parties have agreed to a compromise settlement of the matters in dispute between them, and that since under the compensation statute it is necessary that any settlement compromise be approved in the form of a judgment by the District Judge, they desire to have the case remanded to the District Court for that purpose.

It is now ordered that this case be and the same is hereby remanded to the Honorable, the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, for the purpose of having the compromise *710settlement agreed upon between the parties duly reduced to judgment and to be approved by the Judge of said Court.
#### STEVENS v. VERNON TIMBER CO. et al.

No. 1669.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 12, 1937.

*865J. R. Ferguson, of Leesville, for appellant.

S. I. Foster, of Leesville, for appellee.

DORE, Judge.

Plaintiff filed a suit for compensation under the pauper act (Act No. 1S6 of 1912, as amended). His suit, after trial, was dismissed. From this judgment of dismissal he obtained an order of appeal to this court, returnable on October IS, 1936. The transcript was filed in this court within the three days of grace allowed for filing of the appeal.

The plaintiff has filed a motion in this court suggesting that the record is defective, for the reason that the evidence taken on the trial of the case was not transcribed and filed in the record by the court reporter. We are asked to give appellant time in which to complete the record. After the submission of the case to us, the defendants-appellees filed a motion to dismiss the said appeal, for the reason that the appellant-plaintiff had failed to pay for and caused to be transcribed and filed in the record the note of evidence taken at the trial of the cause in the district court.

We see no merits in the motion to dismiss the appeal. This is a pauper suit. It does not appear that the failure to transcribe and file the' testimony is imputable to any fault of the appellant. The testimony is necessary to a decision of the case on appeal. The appellant should not lose his right to an appeal through the fault or negligence of the clerk in failing to transcribe and file in this court the note of evidence. In accordance with Act No. 234 of 1932, and under the practice of the appellate courts, the record should be remanded to enable the appellant to have it completed as was done in the case of Butitta v. Penny Co. (La.App.) 160 So. 162.

It is therefore ordered that the transcript be returned to the clerk of the district court for the parish of Vernon for the purpose of' completing the record by filing therein the testimony taken on the trial of the case; that the record when completed to be returned to the clerk of this court on or before April 12, 1937; costs to await the final termination of the case.
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 09, 2008
#### In the Matter of Zabdiel Yara, Petitioner, v Wilbur A. Levin, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 727]

Proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Law § 509, by the petitioner, a defendant in a criminal action entitled *People v Zabdiel Yara,*pending trial, inter alia, for murder in the first degree under Kings County Indictment No. 9479/00, among other things, to direct the New York State Office of Court Administration and the Commissioner of Jurors of Kings County to disclose to the petitioner’s counsel all juror qualification questionnaires and a record of persons who were found not qualified or disqualified or who were exempted or excused, and the reasons therefor, or, in the alternative, to direct the Commissioner of Jurors of Kings County and the New York State Office of Court Administration to provide these materials to the court, and seal the materials for appellate review.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements *(see Matter of Hale,*239 AD2d 500; *see generally Matter of Newsday, Inc. v Sise,*120 AD2d 8, *affd*71 NY2d 146, *cert denied*486 US 1056). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-223-01-SM

Jerry A. Shanahan

O R D E R

Defendant Shanahan’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 18). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 

2008 trial period. Defendant Shanahan shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than December 3, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance

shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: February 22, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: March 4, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00223-SM Document 19 Filed 11/26/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

November 26, 2007

cc: Andrew Good, Esq.

Philip Cormier, Esq.

Peter Anderson, Esq.

William Morse, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00223-SM Document 19 Filed 11/26/07 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending October 22, 2005FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOLLEGIATE PEAKS BANCORP, INC.                                                                                          * 3A1Collegiate Peaks Bancorp, Inc., Denver, Colorado, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Collegiate Peaks Bank, Buena Vista, Colorado.Newspaper: 11/12/2005Federal Register: 11/10/2005FIRST MOUNTAIN COMPANY                                                                                                  CICNotification by Garth Lee Gibson and Cynthia Annette Gibson, both of Montrose, Colorado, to acquire control of First Mountain Company, Montrose, Colorado, parent of MontroseBank, Montrose, Colorado.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableNEW MEXICO BANQUEST CORPORATION                                                                                         CICNotification by Alan R. Fairman, DuBois, Pennsylvania; Beverly A. Fairman, Ronald L. Fairman, and Ann W. Fairman, all of Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, acting as a group in concert, to acquire control of New Mexico Banquest Corporation, parent of First National Bank of Santa Fe, both in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Notification by Johnny P. Crowley, Glorieta, New Mexico, as trustee of the New Mexico Banquest Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust, Santa Fe, New Mexico, to acquire control of New Mexico Banquest Corporation, parent of First National Bank of Santa Fe, both in Santa Fe, New Mexico.Newspaper: 11/11/2005Federal Register: 11/08/2005SOLUTIONSBANK                                                                                                           * 18C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-96-PB

Anthony Sawyer

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for August 18, 2009, citing the need for

additional time to complete a review defendant’s past criminal

history and to obtain further medical records for review prior to 

to trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 18, 2009 to November 3, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00096-PB Document 29 Filed 07/23/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 27, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

October 19, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. 

No further continuances in this matter. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 23, 2009

cc: Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00096-PB Document 29 Filed 07/23/09 Page 2 of 2
#### Emmanuel Senyo AGYEMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. KERN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-17076.

D.C. No. CV-99-05913-HGB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 14, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*365MEMORANDUM ***

Detainee Emmanuel Agyeman appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging prison officials used excessive force, denied him adequate medical care, and confined him in a shower stall. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo. *Morrison v. Hall,*261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

In evaluating Agyeman’s excessive force claim, the district court erred in failing to consider Agyeman’s response to interrogatories, *see*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), which creates a genuine issue of material fact regarding the reasonableness of the actions of prison officials. *See LaLonde v. County of Riverside,*204 F.3d 947, 961 (9th Cir. 2000).

Agyeman’s claim of deliberate indifference to his medical needs fails because the admissible evidence demonstrated that prison officials provided timely and adequate medical treatment. *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000).

Agyeman’s unconstitutional conditions of confinement claim fails, because he presented insufficient evidence that he was deprived of the minimal civilized measures of life’s necessities. *See Rhodes v. Chapman,*452 U.S. 337, 347-49, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981).

Each party to bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

United States 

v. Case No. 07-cr-130-01-SM 

Corey Donovan 

ORDER 

Re: Document No. 97, Motion for Relief from Judgment 

Ruling: Denied. Although cast as a motion for relief from 

judgment, the motion challenges the legality of defendant’s 

underlying sentence, and, as such, it is properly construed as a 

motion for relief under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Trenkler v. United States, 536 F.3d 85, 97 (1st Cir. 2008) quoting 

Melton v. United States, 359 F.3d 855, 857 (7th Cir. 2004) (“Any 

motion filed in the district court that imposed the sentence, and 

substantively within the scope of § 2255 . . . is a motion under 

§ 2255, no matter what title the prisoner plasters on the cover.”); 

see also Rodwell v. Pepe,324 F.3d 66, 70 (1st Cir. 2003). By order 

dated June 24, 2009, petitioner was advised of the provisions of 

section 2255, yet he waited until May 25, 2010, to sign (and 

presumably deliver to prison officials for mailing) his motion for 

relief. A motion for relief under section 2255, however, must be 

filed within one year after the conviction becomes final (28 

U.S.C. § 2255(1)). The conviction in this case became final on 

March 24, 2009. Accordingly, the petition is untimely and must be 

dismissed. 

Date: June 22, 2010 

cc: Corey Donovan 

Terry Ollila, AUSA 

Liam Scully, Esq. 

US Probation 

US Marshal 

Case 1:07-cr-00130-SM Document 98 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Sebastian Alvarado

v.

State of New Hampshire

Case No. 06-cv-335-PB

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated October 31, 2006.

SO ORDERED.

November 25, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Sebastian Alvarado, Pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00335-PB Document 36 Filed 11/25/06 Page 1 of 1
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2007...... 1.34 .09 .11 .90 .12 .13 .51 .38 .32 .14 2008...... 1.32 .07 .10 .91 .08 .15 .46 .38 .32 .16 2009...... 1.27 .09 .08 .87 .09 .14 .46 .36 .31 .13 2006: Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Q3... 1.25 .08 .08 .84 .12 .13 .49 .36 .28 .11  Q4... 1.37 .11 .15 .86 .10 .14 .50 .38 .34 .15 2008: Q1... 1.25 .09 .10 .83 .09 .13 .41 .36 .30 .18  Q2... 1.45 .07 .11 1.01 .10 .16 .54 .38 .36 .17  Q3... 1.22 .03 .08 .87 .09 .14 .45 .37 .28 .13  Q4... 1.38 .10 .12 .93 .06 .17 .46 .40 .36 .17 2009: Q1... 1.31 .09 .09 .89 .10 .15 .43 .36 .33 .19  Q2... 1.31 .08 .09 .91 .09 .13 .49 .37 .32 .13  Q3... 1.27 .07 .06 .92 .07 .14 .52 .36 .29 .11  Q4... 1.21 .12 .09 .76 .11 .13 .40 .38 .31 .12  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.