alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Caldarone, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Calton, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
     covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.



Date:  February 20, 2004

/s/ Anthony J. Caldarone
-------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Robert W. Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Piper                                                  
|Robert W. Piper President and Chief Executive
Officer  April 29, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 27, 2024

04

- 24

- 00140

- CR

IN RE Bryant KENDRICK

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On February 26, 2024, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. On March 13, Relator filed a motion notifying this court that it does not have jurisdiction over his mandamus petition. After considering the petition and the motion, this court conclud es it does not have jurisdiction. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED

. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2024

.

__________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of March, 2024

.

_____________________________ Tommy Stolhandske , Clerk o f Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 218

- 07

- 12941

- CR01, pending in the 45 4 th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable Daniel K i ndred presiding.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Richard Patton, President, Chief Executive Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Richard Patton                          
|G. Richard Patton                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|August 7, 2007                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania
Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1


Certification
Pursuant To


Section
906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Steven
Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:





1.
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
      30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or
      78o(d)); and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  August
14, 2009





BY:
                  /s/ Steven StrasserSteven
      StrasserChief
      Executive Officer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
#### NATIONAL MANUFACTURE & STORES CORPORATION v. MOLLENKOPH.

No. 15074.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 13, 1936.

Plerman L. Midlo, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Leo W. McCune, of Gretna, for appellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

The National Manufacture & Stores Corporation, on October 12, 1931, sold to W. P. Mollenkoph, residing in the parish- of Jefferson in this state, certain furniture for the price and sum of $300. Defendant paid $155 on the furniture and then refused to make further payments, claiming that Ihe bedroom set purchased for $145 was not the same set which had been selected by his wife and himself. Plaintiff thereafter filed this suit claiming the balance alleged to be due; in other words, the exact purchase price of the bedroom set. The furniture was seized under a writ of sequestration, but the defendant filed a forthcoming bond and obtained possession of it.

The contention of the defendant is that he and his wife selected a bedroom set which had been exhibited in the store of plaintiff as a floor sample and that, when it was delivered at his residence, it was discovered that it was not the set which had been selected, but was a secondhand set. The evidence is contradictory, but we believe that it establishes clearly that the bedroom set delivered was the same set which had been selected by plaintiff and his wife. The district court held that another set had been substituted; but, after a review of the evidence, we think that this finding was clearly incorrect. We have taken into consideration the attitude of defendant which seems to be a contention that he has a right to retain the furniture, although he has paid nothing whatever on the purchase price thereof.

The minor defects which are shown to have been discovered in the set some months after its delivery are of no great importance and, according to the evidence of plaintiff, could have been repaired but for the objections of defendant’s wife.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that there now be judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the full sum of $145, with legal interest from judicial demand and with recognition of petitioner’s lien and privilege upon the furniture in question.

Reversed.
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02007
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02008
          1
          0
          0
          2
          32009
          2
          3
          2
          2
          92010
          3
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 6, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,889-01

EX PARTE MICHAEL HAROLD BARNES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-41,236 IN THE 358 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KEASLER, and HERVEY, JJ.,

joined.

CONCURRING OPINION

Adhering to the views expressed in my concurring opinion in Ex parte Pointer, ___

S.W.3d ___, Nos. WR-84,786-01 & WR-84,786-02 (Tex. Crim. App. del. June 8, 2016), I

join in the Court’s disposition of this case.

FILED: June 29, 2016

DO NOT PUBLISH
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending April 28, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY, THE                                                                                           PremisesThe Adirondack Trust Company, Saratoga Springs, New York, provides notice to increase its investment in bank premises, pursuant to Section 24A of the Federal Reserve Act and Section 208.21 of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableBANCO PINE S.A.                                                                                                         FBSEABanco Pine S.A., Sao Paulo, Brazil, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended, and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableNONGHYUP BANK                                                                                                           FBSEANongHyup Bank, Seoul, South Korea, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24 of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableRSB Bancorp, MHC                                                                                                        * 3A1RSB Bancorp, MHC and RSB Bancorp, Inc., both of Roselle, New Jersey, to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 percent of Roselle Savings Bank, Roselle, New Jersey.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
H. Res. 977 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 11, 2008. 

Whereas many economists believe the economy of the United 

States is entering a recession; 

Whereas the economy lost 17,000 jobs in January 2008 and 

191,000 in 2007; 

Whereas the manufacturing sector lost 269,000 jobs over the 

past 12 months and 28,000 jobs in January 2008 alone; 

Whereas manufacturing employment now accounts for less 

than 10 percent of the job market for the first time since 

data began being collected in the 1930s; 

Whereas in January 2008, 18.3 percent of those unemployed 

had been out of work for 27 weeks or longer, up from 

16.2 percent a year earlier; 

Whereas manufactured goods imported from developing countries have grown from just 2.5 percent of the gross domestic product in 1990 to 6 percent in 2006; 

Whereas annually, total housing starts decreased in 2007 to 

1,353,700, which is a 24.8 percent decrease from the 

2006 estimate of 1,800,900; 

Whereas Congress and the President responded to the potential recession by passing into law a bipartisan stimulus 

package that provides rebate checks of up to $600 per 
2 

•HRES 977 EH 

individual and $1,200 per married couple, plus an additional $300 per child; 

Whereas the stimulus legislation will put money back into the 

hands of low-income and middle-income Americans, those 

who need it most; 

Whereas the stimulus legislation will be most effective if the 

rebate checks are spent on American-made goods and 

services from American-owned companies; 

Whereas American-made goods are the best in the world; 

Whereas every dollar from the stimulus package spent on an 

American-made good or service, rather than a foreignmade good or service, will result in more than a dollar 

increase in the short-term gross domestic product; 

Whereas if rebate checks are spent on American-made products and services from American-owned companies, an 

additional $10,000,000,000 will be infused into the economy; 

Whereas the annual trade deficit has grown to the 

$700,000,000,000 range in the past decade, up from the 

$100,000,000,000 range in the early 1990s; 

Whereas buying American-made goods would not add to the 

size of the growing trade deficit, which many economists 

contend is unreasonably large; 

Whereas there have been concerns about the safety of imported goods, spurred by the fact that 60 percent of 

product recalls in the past year involved Chinese-made 

toys, food ingredients, and other products; and 

Whereas many countries do not follow the same environmental, labor, and human rights standards of the United 
3 

•HRES 977 EH 

States, putting American workers and companies at a 

competitive disadvantage: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives encourages 

Americans to use their rebate checks from the stimulus package to purchase American-made goods and services from 

American-owned companies. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
| Name of      Organization           |             | State of      Incorporation |  |
|-------------------------------------|-------------|-----------------------------|--|
| West Coast Bank                     | Oregon      |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Trust Company, Inc.      | Oregon      |
|                                |             |
| Totten Inc.                         | Washington  |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory Trust III      | Connecticut |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory Trust IV       | Connecticut |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory Trust V        | Delaware    |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory Trust VI       | Delaware    |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory Trust VII      | Delaware    |
|                                |             |
| West Coast Statutory TrustVIII      | Delaware    |
|                                |             |
| Park Place Condos, LLC              | Oregon      |
|                                |             |
| Carrington Square Developer,    LLC | Oregon      |

----
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2560

LT Case No. 2002-CF-2231-A

_____________________________

TRESTON HOLLINGER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. 

Donna L. Surratt-McIntosh, Judge. 

Treston Hollinger, DeFuniak Springs, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney 

Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-494-PB

Kevin Clark

O R D E R

The prison (Sing Sing) has failed and refused to comply with

this court’s orders and plaintiff’s authorizations to pay initial

filing fees. Plaintiff has therefore been denied any opportunity

to have his complaints considered. He is hereby granted pro se

status and his files will be preliminarily reviewed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 15, 2009

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00494-PB Document 15 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MSC.Software Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Weyand, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except that
(i) the Report was not filed by the date by which the Report was required to be filed and (ii); Item 6. Selected Financial Data in this Report does not include selected financial information for the five years ended December 31, 2005
as required by Item 301 of Regulation S-K; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                  
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM J.
WEYAND                                         
|                   |  |     |  | WILLIAM J. WEYANDChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMIE D. PACELY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 127 WM 2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMIE PACELY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of September, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.