alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

RICARDO N. MURO,

Defendant.

8:23CR118 

ORDER

This matter came before the Court for a status conference on January 10, 2024, by 

telephone with counsel for the parties, Joseph Meyer, on behalf of the government and Julie 

Hansen, on behalf of defendant, Ricardo N. Muro. Discussion held as to case status. The 

defendant moved for the rescheduling of the status conference and agreed to the tolling of time 

under the Speedy Trial Act. The motion was unopposed by the government. For good cause 

shown, the Court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant’s oral motion for rescheduling of the status conference is granted.

2) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of 

justice will be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the 

public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result 

of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date and February 

21, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the 

requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant this motion would deny 

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account 

the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and complexity of the case. The 

failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this 

court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time 

should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.

3) A telephonic status conference with counsel will be held before the undersigned 

magistrate judge at 9:30 a.m. on February 21, 2024. Counsel for the parties shall 

use the conferencing instructions provided by the Court to participate in the call.

(See Filing No. 28). 

Dated this 10th day of January, 2024.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael D. Nelson

United States Magistrate Judge

8:23-cr-00118-BCB-MDN Doc # 37 Filed: 01/10/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 75
Exhibit 10.16

                           MODIFICATION NUMBER TWO



         Pursuant to our Production Contract of February 13, 1995, the

         requirements of Article Three Subsection C are waived for the

         months of October, November, and December, 1996.



         The requirements of Article Three Subsection C remain in force

         through the remainder of the term of the Production Contract



         TN WITNESS WHEREOF


         The undersigned parties have duly executed this modification

         to their agreement on the date last written below.




         CARRINGTON LABORATORIES, INC.      OREGON FREEZE DRY, INC.

         By:   /s/                          By:   /s/
               -----------------------            ---------------------

         Name:                              Name:
               -----------------------            ---------------------

         Title                               Title:
               -----------------------            ---------------------

         Date:                              Date: 11/11/96
               -----------------------            -----------------
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... 73 9 7 23 34 .146 .018 .015 .045 .064

2007...... n.a. 8 13 n.a. n.a. n.a. .014 .025 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00115-CV

Jamie Marshall

v.

Crown Asset Management, LLC

On appeal from the

156th District Court of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 16-0037

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 14, 2017
CALTON, INC.
                                   FORM 10-K
                    FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997

                                  EXHIBIT 21
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF CALTON, INC.



Calton Homes, Inc.                        Calton Tamarack Corp. (3)
Calton Homes of Florida, Inc. (1)         Calton Lindenwood Corp. (3)
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc. (2)    Calton Homes Finance, Inc.
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania at           Calton Homes Finance II, Inc.
 Pennway, Inc. (2)                        Calton Capital, Inc.
Calton Homes of California, Inc. (3)      Calton General, Inc.
Calton California Equity Corp. (3)        Calton Homes of Chicago, Inc. (4)
Calton Manzanita Corp. (3)                Haddon Group of Virginia, Inc.

All subsidiaries are incorporated or organized under the laws of the State of
New Jersey, except those marked with a (1), (2), (3) and (4), which are
incorporated under the laws of Florida, Pennsylvania, California and Illinois,
respectively.
IV 

House Calendar No. 170 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 869 

[Report No. 110–492] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 69) making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2007 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

69) making further continuing appropriations for the 

fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the joint reso3 lution (H.J. Res. 69) making further continuing appro4 priations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes. 

5 All points of order against consideration of the joint reso6 lution are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 

7 10 of rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 869 RH 

1 as read. All points of order against provisions of the joint 

2 resolution are waived. The previous question shall be con3 sidered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage 

4 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

5 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank6 ing minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; 

7 and (2) one motion to recommit. 

8 SEC. 2. During consideration of House Joint Resolu9 tion 69 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the 

10 operation of the previous question, the Chair may post11 pone further consideration of the joint resolution to such 

12 time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

13 SEC. 3. The chairman of the Committee on Appro14 priations shall insert in the Congressional Record at any 

15 time during the remainder of the first session of the 110th 

16 Congress such material as he may deem explanatory of 

17 appropriations measures for the fiscal year 2008. 

18 SEC. 4. House Resolution 839 and House Resolution 

19 850 are laid upon the table. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 170 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 869 

[Report No. 110

–492] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

purposes. priations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other (H.J. Res. 69) making further continuing approDECEMBER 12, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                    INTEGRAL SYSTEMS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATIONS OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
Basic:                                1998             1997            1996
<S>                                <C>              <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of 
common shares                       5,793,433        5,718,060       5,688,126
                                   =============================================
 
Net income                         $1,909,026       $  628,829      $  323,017
                                   ---------------------------------------------
Earnings per share                 $     0.33       $     0.11      $     0.06
                                   ---------------------------------------------
 
Diluted:

Weighted average number of 
common shares                       6,232,933        5,907,613       5,828,005
                                   ---------------------------------------------

Net income                         $1,909,026       $  628,829      $  323,017
                                   ---------------------------------------------
Earnings per share                 $     0.31       $     0.11      $     0.06
                                   =============================================
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 867 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 867

 Commending the Houston Dynamo soccer team for winning the 2007 Major 
                           League Soccer Cup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2007

  Mr. Gene Green of Texas (for himself, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. 
Culberson, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Poe, and Mr. McCaul 
of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the Houston Dynamo soccer team for winning the 2007 Major 
                           League Soccer Cup.

Whereas the Houston Dynamo soccer team won the 2007 Major League Soccer Cup, 
        defeating the New England Revolution by a score of 2-1 at RFK Stadium on 
        November 18, 2007;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo came back from a 1-0 halftime deficit to defeat 
        the Revolution;
Whereas as Dwayne De Rosario, assisted on the tying goal to Joseph Ngwenya, 
        scored the winning goal and was named the game's MVP;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo were playing without Brian Ching, the MVP of last 
        year's MLS Cup due to injury;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo has won the Major League Soccer Cup for the second 
        consecutive year;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo is the first team to win back-to-back MLS Cups in 
        10 years;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo have won the MLS Cup in their first 2 years of 
        existence in Houston;
Whereas Houston Dynamo Coach Dominic Kinnear has guided the team to 26 wins, 20 
        draws, and 16 losses in his first 2 seasons in Houston; and
Whereas Houston Dynamo defender Eddie Robinson and midfielder Dwayne De Rosario 
        were named to the 2007 MLS Best XI all-star team: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Houston Dynamo soccer team for winning the 
        2007 MLS Cup; and
            (2) congratulates the team for back-to-back MLS Cup wins in 
        their first 2 seasons in Houston.
                                 <all>
```
1In addition to Warren Dowaliby, the Superintendent of the

Strafford County House of Correction (“SCHC”), Potocki names SCHC

officers Kirk Derusha and Steve Pollared as defendants to this

action.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Derek Potocki

v. Civil No. 07-cv-071-SM

Warren Dowaliby, Superintendent,

Strafford County House of

Corrections, et al.1

O R D E R

Derek Potocki has filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he was subjected to

unconstitutional treatment while he was incarcerated at the

Strafford County House of Correction (“SCHC”). The matter is

before me for preliminary review to determine whether, among

other things, the complaint states any claim upon which relief

might be granted. See United States District Court for the

District of New Hampshire Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(2); 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). 

Case 1:07-cv-00071-SM Document 9 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 3
2

As fully explained in my Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, and without further comment on

the merits of any of the claims raised by Potocki, I direct that

(1) the excessive force claim proceed against Pollared, (2) the

Harassment claim proceed against Derusha, and (3) the conditions

of confinement claim proceed against Dowaliby. This Order shall

serve to replace my Order of August 16, 2007, directing plaintiff

to amend his complaint, which is withdrawn.

My review of the case filings indicates that plaintiff has

filed summons forms for each of the defendants listed. The

Clerk’s office is directed to issue the summonses against

defendants and forward to the United States Marshal for the

District of New Hampshire (the “U.S. Marshal’s office”) the and

copies of the complaint (document no. 1), the Report and

Recommendation issued this date, and this Order. Upon receipt of

the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s office shall

effect service upon defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on

Case 1:07-cv-00071-SM Document 9 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 3
3

the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 12, 2007

cc: Derek Potocki, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00071-SM Document 9 Filed 09/12/07 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB

DANIEL LEROY RHODEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RYAN O’HAYRE and

STUART RUYBAL,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Docket

No. 83] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on March 25, 2014, it is

ORDERED that The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boyd

N. Boland [Docket No. 82] is ACCEPTED. It is further

ORDERED that defendants Ryan O’Hayre and Stuart Ruybal’s Motion for

Summary Judgment [Docket No. 77] is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s first claim for relief is

dismissed with prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh claims for relief are

dismissed without prejudice. It is further

ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and

against the plaintiff. It is further

Case 1:11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB Document 84 Filed 03/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk

of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further

ORDERED that this case is CLOSED.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 26th day of March, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

s/Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-01734-PAB-BNB Document 84 Filed 03/26/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Eduardo Baez, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[807 NYS2d 485]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered June 30, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is serving concurrent prison sentences following his 1993 conviction of conspiracy in the second degree and two convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree. In June 2004, petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was denied. After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the Board’s determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

The record belies petitioner’s contention that the Board considered the nature of the instant offense to the exclusion of all other relevant statutory factors. Rather, the record demonstrates that the Board considered the relevant statutory factors, including petitioner’s educational and programming achievements while incarcerated, lack of disciplinary infractions and plans upon release *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [1] [a]; [2] [c] [A]). Although the Board emphasized his instant offense, which involved petitioner—a manager in a drug ring—selling three ounces of cocaine and a conspiracy to murder a rival drug leader, the Board is not required to give equal weight to, or specifically *1053discuss, every factor it considered in rending its determination *(see Matter of Sanchez v Dennison,*21 AD3d 1249, 1250 [2005]; *Matter of Morel v Travis,*18 AD3d 930, 931 [2005]). Moreover, the record contains no support for petitioner’s claim that the Board considered erroneous information regarding his role in the crimes for which he was convicted. As the Board considered the appropriate statutory factors, and there is no showing of “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]), further judicial review of the determination is precluded *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [5]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE
                    (Unaudited And As Restated, See Note 11)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                         --------------------------
                                                          March 31,      March 31,
                                                            1997           1996
                                                         ---------      ----------

<S>                                                      <C>            <C>       
Pro Forma Net Income                                     $ 142,511      $    7,891
                                                         =========      ==========

                                                  PRO FORMA NET INCOMED PER SHARE - BASIC

Weighted average common shares - Basic                   8,699,745       6,783,078
                                                         =========      ==========
Pro forma net income per share - Basic                   $    0.02      $     0.00
                                                         =========      ==========

                                                 PRO FORMA NET INCOMED PER SHARE - DILUTED

Shares used in this computation:
 Weighted average common shares - Basic                  8,699,745       6,783,078

Diluted effect of shares under employee stock plans        582,104         542,414
                                                         =========      ==========
Weighted average common shares - Diluted                 9,281,849       7,325,492
                                                         =========      ==========
Pro forma net income per share - Diluted                 $    0.02      $     0.00
                                                         =========      ==========
</TABLE>
Blueprint





  Exhibit 10.1











 



NOTICE REGARDING



COMMERCIAL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


 


 

 

 


THIS
NOTICE REGARDING COMMERCIAL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this
“Notice”) from MHP
PURSUITS LLC, aNorth Carolina limited liability company
(“Buyer”), to The ARC
Investment Trust (“Seller”) as of this 10th
day of September, 2019.

 


Seller
and Buyer entered into that certain Commercial Purchase and Sale
Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated August
1, 2019, for the purchase and sale of certain properties known as
Paradise Gardens, Hyler Acres, Hermitage Pond, Davis Estates and
Hidden Valley located in West Columbia and Lexington, South
Carolina (the “Property”), such Property
being more particularly described in the Agreement. Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth
in the Agreement.

 

1. Termination. This Notice shall
constitute Buyer’s exercise of its right to terminate the
Agreement prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period in
accordance with Section 1k of the Agreement, and Buyer’s
earnest money shall be promptly refunded to Buyer.

 

2. Counterparts. This Notice may
be executed in several counterparts, all of which are identical and
all of which counterparts together shall constitute one and the
same document. This Notice may be executed by facsimile or
electronic mail signature.

 


 

 


	
BUYER:

	
SELLER:


	
 

	
  


	
MHP PURSUITS LLC, a North
Carolina limited liability company

	
/s/ Alva R.
Cox




	
 

	
  




	
By: /s/ Adam A. Martin

Name: Adam A.
Martin

Title: Chief
Investment Officer

	
  


	
  
 

	
  


	
By: 
/s/ Michael Z.
Anise

Name: Michael Z.
Anise

Title: President /
CFO