alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roylee Rivers, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 918]

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Egan, J.), *862June 23, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in summarily denying the pro se motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea *(see*CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Franco,*145 AD2d 837). “The record establishes that a favorable and voluntary plea was entered after a thorough allocution” *(People v Rivera,*258 AD2d 426, 426, *lv denied*93 NY2d 1005; *see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520, 524-526), and the court “personally observed defendant’s participation in extensive plea negotiations, as well as defendant’s demeanor and attitude, both at the time the plea was entered and thereafter” *(People v Aquino,*237 AD2d 203, 204; *see also People v Hudson,*237 AD2d 759, 760, *lv denied*90 NY2d 1012). We further conclude that defense counsel’s statements in response to the pro se motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea did not deny defendant effective assistance of counsel. Defense counsel merely described her pre-plea discussion with defendant concerning sentencing parameters and did not thereby become a witness against defendant *(see People v Cross,*262 AD2d 223, 224, *lv denied*94 NY2d 902; *see also People v Viscomi,*286 AD2d 886, 886, *lv denied*97 NY2d 763). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present — Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2007

To assist poor communities with public elementary and secondary school

construction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To assist poor communities with public elementary and

secondary school construction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE FOR

4 POOR COMMUNITIES AUTHORIZED.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education is au6 thorized to make grants to eligible local educational agen7 cies to assist them in addressing the cost of constructing

8 new public elementary and secondary school facilities or

9 building additions to existing public elementary and sec10 ondary school facilities.
2

•HR 2007 IH

1 (b) ELIGIBILITY.—A local educational agency is eligi2 ble to receive funds under this section if 20 percent or

3 more of the children aged 5 to 17, inclusive, served by

4 the local educational agency are from families with in5 comes below the poverty line.

6 (c) LIMITATION ON FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal

7 funds provided under this section to a local educational

8 agency may not exceed 10 percent of the total cost of the

9 project to be assisted under this section.

10 (d) PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT

11 AND PRODUCTS.—In the case of any equipment or prod12 ucts that may be authorized to be purchased with financial

13 assistance provided under this section, it is the sense of

14 the Congress that entities receiving such assistance

15 should, in expending the assistance, purchase only Amer16 ican-made equipment and products.

17 (e) NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS OF ASSISTANCE.—In

18 providing financial assistance under this section, the head

19 of each Federal agency shall provide to each recipient of

20 the assistance a notice describing the statement made in

21 subsection (d) by the Congress.

22 (f) USE OF AMERICAN-MADE STEEL.—A local edu23 cational agency receiving financial assistance under this

24 section for construction shall use American-made steel for

25 such construction and shall comply with the requirements
3

•HR 2007 IH

1 of the Act of March 3, 1933 (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq., popu2 larly known as the ‘‘Buy American Act’’).

3 (g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

4 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act

5 $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.

6 (h) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

7 (1) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY.—The term

8 ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given

9 such term in section 14101 of the Elementary and

10 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 8801).

11 (2) POVERTY LINE.—The term ‘‘poverty line’’

12 means the poverty line (as defined by the Office of

13 Management and Budget, and revised annually in

14 accordance with section 673(2) of the Community

15 Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2))) ap16 plicable to a family of the size involved.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 971 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 13, 2008.
Whereas on the evening of Tuesday, February 5th, 2008, more than 100 tornados 
        devastated communities in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, and 
        Tennessee;
Whereas more than 50 lives were lost in the deadliest tornado outbreak in the 
        United States in more than 20 years;
Whereas more than a thousand homes, schools, and businesses were destroyed and 
        tens of thousands of residents of the Mississippi Valley have been left 
        without power;
Whereas the effect of the storms on Mississippi Valley families and businesses 
        is still being felt;
Whereas hundreds of volunteers took time from their daily lives to help ensure 
        that the victims of the storm are sheltered, clothed, fed, and 
        emotionally comforted through this traumatic event;
Whereas the Federal Emergency Management Agency, first responders, the National 
        Guard, and additional emergency personnel have coordinated with local 
        authorities and firefighters and have performed beyond the call of duty 
        in the preservation and protection of human lives; and
Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the citizens of the 
        Mississippi Valley have been evident following the tornados: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the citizens of the States 
        hit by the storms over the devastation caused by the powerful tornados 
        that struck their communities on February 5th, 2008;
            (2) expresses its appreciation to the Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency, first responders, and the others involved in the relief effort 
        for their valiant service to those affected by the storms; and
            (3) expresses its support as the citizens of these communities 
        continue their efforts to rebuild their community and their lives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132095 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132095 COA: 271710 Cass CC: 00-010527-FC BRIAN JAMES HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

d1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned,
Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 25, 2006

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the Report), I, Robert W. Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/    Robert W. Piper                                              
|                                                                    
|Robert W. Piper President and Chief Executive
Officer April 28, 2004
#### Kathryn Watts, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[809 NYS2d 5]

Judgment, Court of Claims of the State of New York (Alan C. Marin, J.), entered on or about August 3, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, after a nonjury trial on damages, made no award of damages for post-traumatic stress disorder, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In a nonjury trial, “ ‘the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court’s conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, especially when the findings of fact rest in large measure on considerations relating to the credibility of witnesses’ ” *(Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*179 AD2d 29, 31 [1992], *affd*80 NY2d 490 [1992], quoting *Claridge Gardens v Menotti,*160 AD2d 544, 544-545 [1990]). Here, there is no basis to disturb the trial court’s determination, premised upon its resolution of conflicting expert testimony and attendant credibility determinations, that claimant did not suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of being hit on the head by falling ceiling plaster at defendant’s facility.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 21

                                                          Page 176 of 181<PAGE>

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent
corporation of two hundred fifty-three subsidiaries which operate
"off-price" retail apparel stores in the United States. 

Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation, which
buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in connection with
the Company's business. 

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation, which leases the Company's store in Clifton Heights,
Pennsylvania to one of the Company's operating subsidiaries. 

Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates a
wholesale apparel business. 

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an
interest in a manufacturer of coats. 

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company
collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade
names. 

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, through which the
Company invests excess funds. 

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, through which the Company
provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of
their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.  

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.




                                                         Page 177 of 181<PAGE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending October 22, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCLAYTON HC, INC.                                                                                                        * 3A1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending January 16, 2021FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
214 La. 365

#### STATE v. STEWART et al.

No. 39007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 8, 1948.

Alcide J. Weysham and James I. McCain, both of New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Herve Ra-civitch, Dist. Atty., Geo. McCulloch, and Alexander E. Ralston, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., all of New Orleans, for the State.

HAMITER, Justice.

The defendants, Joseph M. Stewart and his wife, Mrs. Augusta Stewart, were tried and convicted, by the Juvenile Court of Orleans Parish, under a charge of having contributed to the delinquency of a juvenile by aiding a girl sixteen years of age to perform an act of sexual intercourse. Each was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve one year in the Parish Prison; the sentence given Mrs. Stewart, however, was suspended.

Joseph M. Stewart alone has appealed.

The provision of the Louisiana Criminal Code, Act No. 43 of 1942, allegedly contravened by appellant, and on which the charge in question was based, recited:

> “Art. 92. Contributing to the delinquency of juveniles is the intentional enticing, aiding, or permitting, by anyone over the age of seventeen, of any child under the age of seventeen to:

> ******

> “(7) Perform any immoral act; * * *."

In this court, to quote from its brief, the State presents only the following argument:

> “Since the trial and sentence in this proceeding, the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in the case of State v. Vallery, [212 La. 1095], 34 So.2d 329 (1948), has held Section 7 of Article 92 [of the Louisiana Criminal Code] to be unconstitutional.

> “The Legislature of Louisiana, at its Regular 1948 Session, apparently recognizing the Vallery decision, enacted Act 388 which amended Section *7*of Article 92, whereby the word ‘sexually’ was inserted before the phrase ‘immoral act’.

> *821“In view of the foregoing, the State respectfully submits the matter.” (Brackets ours.)

Inasmuch as -appellant’s conviction and sentence were for the violation of an unconstitutional provision of law, necessarily they must be set aside.

For the reasons assigned the conviction and sentence of Joseph M. Stewart are annulled and set aside, and it is ordered that he be discharged.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into Inland Resource Inc.'s previously filed
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-41662), Form S-8 (File No.
333-27449), Form S-8 (File No. 33-84640), Form S-3 (File No. 33-84766), Form S-8
(File No. 333-43430), Form S-8 (File No. 333-43432), and Form S-8 (File No.
333-43434).



                                                         /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 26, 2002
#### GRAND LODGE, GENERAL GRAND INDEPENDENT ORDER OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF LOVE & CHARITY, etc., Inc., v. James RANDALL and Isaiah Sumner.

No. 1183.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 17, 1933.

Chas. J. Mundy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Rene H. Ilimel, of Franklin, for appellees.

*749LE BLANC, Judge.

This is one of the two suits referred to in the opinion in the case of Isaiah Sumner v. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias of State of Louisiana (La. App.) 147 So. 747, this day handed down, in which the issue as between Isaiah Sumner and James Bandall, intervener in that proceeding, is the same. As stated in the opinion in that case, the suits were consolidated for the purpose of trial and also for argument before this court. In this suit, judgment was rendered in favor of James Bandall recognizing him as beneficiary under the policy issued by the plaintiff in this case in favor of Allen Sumner, deceased, and as such, entitled to the proceeds thereof which had been deposited by plaintiff in the registry of the court.

For the same reasons as are assigned in the ease of Isaiah Sumner v. Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from herein be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.







May 1, 2006                              /s/ Richard J. Lampen
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Richard J. Lampen
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.22**SECOND AMENDMENT TO FINANCING AGREEMENT**     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO FINANCING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into onthis ___day of June, 2007, to be effective as of the date hereof (the “Effective Date”),by and between PIZZA INN, INC., a Missouri corporation with a principal place of business at 3551Plano Parkway, The Colony, Texas 75056 (herein the “Company”), and THE CIT GROUP/COMMERCIALSERVICES, INC., a New York corporation (the “Lender”).**RECITALS**     A. The Company and the Lender have entered into that certain Financing Agreement, dated as ofJanuary 23, 2007 (as amended from time to time, the “Financing Agreement”).     B. The Company has requested (i) that Lender amend the Financing Agreement to permit Companyto repurchase Company stock in an amount up to $3,000,000 (the “Stock Repurchase”), (ii)that Lender amend the Financing Agreement to waive the requirement that cash dividends or cashdistributions may be allowed as a Permitted Distribution only as long as they are not made untilthe first anniversary of the Closing Date, and (iii) that Lender amend the Financing Agreement toincrease the current aggregate Capital Expenditure limit of $750,000 per fiscal year pursuant toSection 7.3(b) of the Financing Agreement to $3,000,000.     C. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment, Company and Lender are willing toamend the Financing Agreement as hereinafter set forth.     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein contained and other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intendingto be legally bound, agree as follows:**AGREEMENT****ARTICLE I**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC., an Illinois Limited Liability Company, 

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER REGARDING RETURN OF TRIAL EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS

______________________________________________________________________________

After review of the record and Judgment being entered on March 12, 2008 [284], it is 

ORDERED that counsel for the respective parties shall contact the Court’s courtroom deputy

at (303) 335-2112 to make arrangements for the return of all trial exhibits and depositions retained

at the conclusion of the trial on October 16, 2007 and stored at the Clerk’s Office, Alfred A. Arraj

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver Colorado 80294.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 28th day of April, 2008.

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

____________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Judge

United States District Court