alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6740

JAMES ARTHUR BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versusLONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Augusta Correctional Center; JOHN B. METZGER, III, Chairman,Virginia Parole Board; RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; LAUREL A. CORNER, Manager, Central Criminaland Legal Records; V. V. GRANT, Augusta Grievance Coordinator; MRS. BYRAM, Secretary/AWP, Augusta Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees, and LYDIA CALVERT TAYLOR, Judge, Circuit Court for the City of Norfolk; THOMAS H. WOOD, Judge, Augusta County Circuit Court; R. M. SPENCER, Judge, Norfolk General District Court; KENT P.PORTER, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney, Circuit Court for the City of Norfolk; JAMES N. GARRETT, JR., Defense Counsel, Portsmouth;JUNIUS P. FULTON, III, Appellate Counsel, Norfolk, Virginia; MARION R. CRANK, Detective, Youth Division S/C Unit of Norfolk, Defendants.2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-804-2) Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.Appellant filed an action seeking damages, challenging his ineligibility for parole under Virginia law. To recover damages for an allegedly unconstitutional conviction or sentence, or for other harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a prisoner must prove that the conviction orsentence was: (1) reversed on direct appeal; (2) expunged by executive order; (3) declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such a determination; or (4) called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. See Heck v. Humphrey, ___ U.S. ___, 62 U.S.L.W. 4594, 4597 (U.S. June 24, 1994) (No. 93-6188). Because Appellant has failed to make such a showing, his claim is not ripe and must be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, weaffirm as modified to reflect dismissal without prejudice to Appellant's right to file another action if his claim becomes ripe. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1992...... 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.8 9.3 6.3 9.7 9.3 8.8 7.1 1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2000: Q4... 10.0 10.0 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.4 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.7 2001: Q1... 9.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.2 8.3 10.1 9.8 9.6 8.7  Q2... 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.1 7.8 9.2 8.9 8.6 7.9  Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1  Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

D'ANGELO M. NICHOLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-4023

February 16, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug,

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-153-PB

Lan Thy Ly

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for August 18, 2009, citing new counsel and the

need for additional time to complete discovery and prepare for

trial. The government does not object to a continuance of the

trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 18, 2009 to October 6, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00153-PB Document 11 Filed 07/28/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 30, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 23, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 28, 2009

cc: R. Brian Snow, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00153-PB Document 11 Filed 07/28/09 Page 2 of 2
##### 



(MET-CHEM LOGO)

|                                                                                              |  |                                                                     
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Met-Chem Canada Inc.
555, boul. René-Lévesque Ouest
3e étage
Montréal (Québec)
Canada
H2Z 1B1 |  | Subbiah Srinivasan, P. Eng.
Vice-President Intl & Managing Director



| | Montreal, May 15th, 2003
| | ------------------------

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St. N. W.
Washington, DC  20259
USA

|         |  |                                                           
|-------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|SUBJECT: |  | Our reports dated April 2001Mineral reserves and resources

---

We hereby consent to the inclusion of references to our reports dated April
2001, regarding the mineral reserves and resources of the Joe Mann Mine, Copper
Rand 5000, Cedar Bay, Corner Bay Inner Block Deposit, Eastmain Property,
Bachelor Lake Property, Chevrier Property and Discovery Property, which appear
under Item 4 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Campbell Resources Inc. (the
Corporation) for the year ended December 31st, 2002.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (registration Nos. 33-2896, 33-91824,
333-93063 and 333-6236) pertaining to the Corporations Employee Incentive Plan
and Directors Stock Option Plan.

| |  |                                     
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Subbiah Srinivasan, Eng.        
| |  |                                     
| |  | Subbiah Srinivasan, Eng.            
| |  | Vice-President and Managing Director

(514) 288-5211, ext. 311
(514) 288-7937
ssrinivasan@Met-Chem.com
www.Met-Chem.com
 
A subsidiary of UEC Technologies LLC
#### The Erie Railroad Co. et al. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 24676

— Decided June 20, 1934.)

*Messrs. Wilson & Rector, Messrs. Pomerene & Boulger, Mr. PL. C. Weaver, Mr. E. J. Shover, Mr. James W. Huffman*and *Mr. D. H. Armstrong,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Henderson, Burr, Randall db Porter,*for cross-petitioner in error, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

*Mr. John W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. Donald G. Power,*for defendant in error.

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition in error, the cross-petition in error, and the transcript of the record of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order *473of the said Public Utilities Commission be, and the same is hereby, reversed for the reason that the same is unlawful. The Public Utilities Commission did not comply with the provisions of Section 614-91, General Code, by giving the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, operating in the territory through which the applicant for a certificate of convenience and necessity proposes to operate, at least ten days’ notice of the hearing upon such application *(Buckeye Stages, Inc.,*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*127 Ohio St., 575), and the failure of the Public Utilities Commission to give the statutory notice was not waived by the fact that the Baltimore *&*Ohio Railroad Company had knowledge of the filing and pendency of an application for a certificate prior to the decision of the commission thereon, especially since the order which the commission finally granted exceeded the terms of the request contained in the application originally filed.

It is further ordered that this proceeding be remanded to the Public Utilities Commission for further proceedings according to law.

*Order reversed.*

Weyganbt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and "Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Zimmerman, J., not participating.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 09-cr-01-01-SM

Jose Arroyo Castillo,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Castillo’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

9). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of May 2009. Defendant Castillo 

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than March 20, 2009. On the

filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 10 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for May 12, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on May 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 6, 2009

cc: Bruce E. Kenna, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 10 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel Riley

v. Case No. 08-mj-19

United States,

Thomas Colantuono

Robert Kinsella

Arnold Huftalen

Stephen Monier

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

February 7, 2008

cc: Daniel Riley, pro se

Case 1:08-mj-00019-WES Document 6 Filed 02/07/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Michael DeNicola et al., Appellants, v Assured Sprinkler and Mechanical, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[809 NYS2d 126]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered June 30, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendant Assured Sprinkler and Mechanical, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 240 (1), § 241 (6), and § 200 and common-law negligence insofar as asserted against it, and granted those branches of the separate motion of the defendant Centro Bíblico, Inc., which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Michael DeNicola allegedly was injured when a portion of a parapet wall fell on him as he stood on the roof of a building while an air conditioning unit was being removed from the roof for salvage. The Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment. The defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) by establishing that the accident did not involve an elevation-related risk within the contemplation of the statute *(see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc.,*96 NY2d 259 [2001]; *Misseritti v Mark IV Constr. Co.,*86 NY2d 487, 491 [1995]; *Matter of Sabovic v State of New York,*229 AD2d 586, 587 [1996]). The defendants also made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) by demonstrating that the provisions of the Industrial Code upon which the plaintiffs rely do not apply to the facts on which their claim is based *(see Georgopulos v Gertz Plaza, Inc.,*13 AD3d 478 [2004]; *Zuniga v Stam Realty,*169 Misc 2d 1004, 1010 [1996], *affd*245 AD2d 561 [1997]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to the defendants’ liability pursuant to either section of the Labor Law.

Further, the causes of action to recover damages based upon common-law negligence and an alleged violation of Labor Law *648§ 200 were also properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Assured Sprinkler and Mechanical, Inc. (hereinafter Assured). Assured met its burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition thereto *(see Rizzuto v L.A. Wenger Contr. Co.,*91 NY2d 343 [1998]). Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
-1-

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00345-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. JUAN FRANCISCO-MIGUEL, a/k/a Juan Thomas, a/k/a Juan Andres Francisco, 

a/k/a Jesse Martinez , 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

A Change of Plea hearing is set for Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents separately to 

Judge Daniel=s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 72 

HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted, the 

hearing will be VACATED. There will be no exceptions to this policy, and sanctions 

may be imposed for failure to comply. 

Dated: January 4, 2012
#### Makley *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24935

— Decided September 26, 1934.)

*Miss Jessie Levy*and *Mr. Clarence C. Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Ernest M. Botkin,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Joseph E. Flick*and *Mr. Benjamin 8. Motter,*fo!r defendant in error..

This cause came on to be heard on September 19, 1934, upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Allen county, upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the petition in error filed as of right herein, and was argued by counsel.

Thereafter, on September 25, 1934, the Warden of the Ohio Penitentiary, wherein said plaintiff in error was confined, advised the court that said plaintiff in error died on Monday, September 24, 1934, and the question herein having thus become moot, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that said petition in error *572be, and the same hereby .is, dismissed on authority of *Miner*v. *Witt.*82 Ohio St., 237.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, 0. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Beyis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
The Board of Directors 
Peoples First Corporation: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-28301 on Form S-3 and No.  33-28304 on Form S-8 of Peoples First Corporation
of our report dated January 23, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Peoples First Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stock-
holders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual
report on Form 10-K of Peoples First Corporation. 


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 

St. Louis, Missouri 
March 11, 1998
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending August 24, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 104

  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to establish criminal 
penalties for knowingly and willfully falsifying or failing to file or 
   report certain information required to be reported under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 2007

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to establish criminal 
penalties for knowingly and willfully falsifying or failing to file or 
   report certain information required to be reported under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KNOWING AND WILLFUL FALSIFICATION OR FAILURE TO REPORT.

    Section 104 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and 
willfully falsify, or to knowingly and willingly fail to file or 
report, any information that such person is required to report under 
section 102.
    ``(B) Any person who violates subparagraph (A) shall be fined under 
title 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or 
both.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2099 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2099

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2099

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE.

    Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 110 Stat. 4154) is amended 
by striking ``$5,000,000'' and all that follows through the period and 
inserting ``$15,000,000 for development costs associated with capital 
projects consistent with the cooperative management plan, except that 
the Federal share of such development costs shall not exceed 50 percent 
of the total costs.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
H. Res. 943 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 6, 2008. 

Whereas January 28, 2008, marks the 22-year anniversary of 

the tragic accident of the space shuttle Challenger, Mission 51–L, and the loss of seven of America’s bravest and 

most dedicated citizens; 

Whereas the space shuttle Challenger disaster occurred off 

the coast of central Florida, at 11:39 a.m. on January 

28, 1986; 

Whereas the space shuttle Challenger disintegrated 73 seconds into its flight after an O-ring seal in its right solid 

rocket booster failed at lift-off; 

Whereas the seven-person crew on the shuttle included Commander Francis R. Scobee, Pilot Michael J. Smith, Mission Specialist Judith A. Resnik, Mission Specialist 

Ellison S. Onizuka, Mission Specialist Ronald E. McNair, 

Payload Specialist Gregory B. Jarvis, and Payload Specialist Sharon Christa McAuliffe; 

Whereas Christa McAuliffe, a schoolteacher from Concord, 

New Hampshire, was on board as the first member in the 

Teacher in Space Project; 

Whereas the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

(NASA) selected Christa McAuliffe from a field of 
2 

•HRES 943 EH 

11,000 applicants to be a part of the Challenger crew 

and teach lessons to schoolchildren from space; 

Whereas the Committee on Science and Technology of the 

House of Representatives conducted oversight hearings 

on the Challenger disaster and released a report on October 29, 1986, on the causes of the accident; and 

Whereas the House of Representatives continues to support 

NASA and its ongoing efforts to explore and educate the 

American public about space: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the 22nd anniversary of the space shuttle Challenger disaster; 

(2) celebrates the courage and bravery of the crew 

of the Challenger, and Christa McAuliffe and her passion for encouraging America’s children to pursue careers in science and mathematics; 

(3) commits itself and the Nation to using the lessons learned in inquiries into the space shuttle Challenger accident to ensure that the space agency always 

operates on a strong and stable foundation; and 

(4) recognizes the continued dedication of the 

United States to the goal of space exploration for the 

benefit of all mankind. 

Attest: 

Clerk.