alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Release Date: March 31, 2003*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 9.7     | 9.6                    | 9.1                                |
| 9.3     | 9.1                    | 8.5                                |
| 8.8     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 7.9     | 7.7                    | 7.2                                |
| 7.4     | 7.5                    | 7.0                                |
| 7.2     | 7.2                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.6                    | 6.3                                |
||
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| n.a.    | n.a.                   | n.a.                               |
| 7.7     | 7.6                    | 7.1                                |
| 7.5     | 7.4                    | 6.9                                |
| 7.2     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 916 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 23, 2008.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2006-2007 academic 
        year was more than 2,300,000 and the student-teacher ratio was 15 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 25 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        from minority backgrounds, and nearly 14 percent are non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development;
Whereas the Catholic high school graduation rate is 99 percent, with 80 percent 
        of graduates attending four-year colleges and 17 percent attending two-
        year colleges or technical schools;
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated: ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives.''; and
Whereas January 27 to February 2, 2008, has been designated as Catholic Schools 
        Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United 
        States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event co-
        sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 
        recognize the vital contributions of America's thousands of Catholic 
        elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### PARKS v. HALL et al. *

No. 5440.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 1, 1937.

Rehearing Granted June 30, 1937.

Writ of Certiorari and Review Granted Feb. 7, 1938.

Sholars & Gunby and G. Allen Kimball,, all of Monroe, for appellants.

McHenry, Lamkin & Lamkin, of Monroe, for appellee.

*

 Judgment annulled — So. -.

HAMITER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned Edward Parks v. Harvey Hall et al., 179 So. 868, this day decided by us, the judgment appealed from, in so far as the defendants M. L. Gans and Phoenix Indemnity Company are concerned, is set aside' and reversed, and plaintiff’s suit is dismissed at his cost in both courts.

DREW, Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case for the reason that I am of the opinion that the omnibus clause in the insurance policy covers the case and makes the insurance company liable thereunder. In my opinion the driver of the car causing the damage was lawfully in possession of same at the time of the accident.

On Rehearing.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

For the written reasons this day assigned in Edward Parks v. Harvey Hall et al., on rehearing, La.App., 179 So. 868, the judgment heretofore rendered herein is reinstated and made final.

DREW, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2042 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2042

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the tax on the 
         net capital gain of taxpayers other than corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                 May 26 (Legislative day, May 25), 2001

 Mr. Knollenberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the tax on the 
         net capital gain of taxpayers other than corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Job Creation Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF NET CAPITAL GAIN OF TAXPAYERS OTHER THAN 
              CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Part I of subchapter P of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to treatment of capital gains) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 1203. EXCLUSION OF NET CAPITAL GAIN OF TAXPAYERS OTHER THAN 
              CORPORATIONS.

    ``In the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation, gross income 
shall not include an amount equal to the net capital gain of the 
taxpayer for the taxable year.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (h).
            (2) Subsection (b) of section 55 of such Code is amended by 
        striking paragraph (3).
            (3) Section 1222 of such Code is amended by adding at the 
        end the following new sentence:
``Determinations under this section shall be made before the 
application of section 1203.''
            (4) The table of sections for part I of subchapter P of 
        chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new item:

                              ``Sec. 1203. Exclusion of net capital 
                                        gain of taxpayers other than 
                                        corporations.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2093 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2093

                  For the relief of Rodney E. Hoover.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2001

  Mrs. Capps introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Rodney E. Hoover.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IN GENERAL.

    The United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
California shall have jurisdiction to hear, determine, and render 
judgment on any claim of or on behalf of Rodney E. Hoover of Arroyo 
Grande, California, against the United States for personal injuries 
which he allegedly sustained in an accident on February 26, 1940, and 
in transport on March 4, 1940, while a member of the Civilian 
Conservation Corps in Beaver City, Nebraska.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER PROVISIONS.

    Solely for the purposes of establishing jurisdiction under section 
1346(b) of title 28, United States Code, the events giving rise to the 
alleged injuries referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to have 
occurred after January 1, 1945.

SEC. 3. TIME LIMITATION.

    Any claim under this Act shall be barred unless it is filed with 
the appropriate Federal agency pursuant to section 2675 of title 28, 
United States Code, within six months after the date of enactment of 
this Act, and such claim, if so filed, shall be considered to have been 
filed in a timely manner notwithstanding the time limitation of section 
2401 of such title.

SEC. 4. LIABILITY.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed as an interference or 
admission of liability by the United States.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 08-cv-499-SM

David M. Hulick

Caroline P. Hulick

NOTICE OF RULING / ORDER

Re: Document No. 120, Motion for Entry of Order Determining US 

Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge and Vacating Attorney's 

Fees Order Issued by Magistrate Judge

Ruling: Granted. The United States' objection to the 

Magistrate Judge's order dated May 30, 2012 (Dkt. No. 98) is 

sustained, and that order is vacated. Having carefully reviewed the 

pleadings and the docket, it appears to me that in large part the 

imposed sanctions followed inevitably from a mistake made by me in 

granting the joint assented to motion to continue and extend 

deadlines (Dkt. No. 76) and mooting the motion to continue and extend 

deadlines (Dkt. No. 71) when, upon reflection, I intended the 

reverse. The Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that the court 

considered the discovery deadline extended to allow the depositions 

of IRS employees before trial. But, I cannot say it was unreasonable 

for the United States to have viewed the circumstances differently 

Case 1:08-cv-00499-SM Document 122 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 2
given the actual rulings entered on the docket. While good practice 

consistent with the collegiality expected in this district should 

have resulted in an agreement with respect to those depositions, 

particularly given the government's apparent agreement in principle 

to produce the witnesses for deposition, still, the government 

could have plausibly construed my earlier rulings as justifying a 

refusal to do so absent an order compelling that result, or an order 

reopening and extending the discovery period for that purpose, 

particularly in light of the court's known reluctance to enforce 

private discovery agreements that are inconsistent with outstanding 

case management orders.

So ordered.

August 8, 2012 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

United State District Court

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00499-SM Document 122 Filed 08/08/12 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-164-01/03-SM

Juan Galan and James Bell,

 Defendants

O R D E R

Defendant Bell’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no. 31). 

 Trial has been rescheduled for the month of October 2009. Defendant Bell shall

file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than July 13, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, the continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 33 Filed 07/01/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for October 7, 2009 at 11:30 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on October 20, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

July 1, 2009 

cc: Daniel D. Lustenberger, Esq.

Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq. 

Jennifer C. Davis, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 33 Filed 07/01/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MoneyLogix
Group, Inc. for the three month period ending September 30, 2010, I Binnay
Sethi, Chief Financial Officer of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1.
  Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending 
September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
  The information contained in such Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010, fairly represents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
MoneyLogix Group, Inc.








MONEYLOGIX
      GROUP, INC.By:
              /s/ Binnay
      SethiBinnay
      SethiPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and
                ChiefFinancial
      Officer
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement Nos. 333-137325, 333-104835,
333-104458, 333-88382, 333-35318, 333-35208, 333-86113, 333-09721, 333-01649,
333-01651, and 033-60259 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 23, 2009,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of West Coast Bancorp, and the
effectiveness of West Coast Bancorps internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Coast Bancorp for the year
ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, OregonFebruary 23, 2009

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant,

v.

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,

Additional Party on Counterlcaim.

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION

Pursuant to the hearing held on March 15, 2007, it is

ORDERED that the Defendant Molychem LLC’s Motion for Dismissal of Claims Against

Additional Party on Counterclaim Phelps Dodge Corporation (Doc. # 209), is granted and the

claims are dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: March 15th, 2007

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

___________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 216 Filed 03/15/07 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, August 7-11, 2006Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,407,870 71,130 208,652 508,381 329,866 27,745 72,3Number of loans 26,007 1,598 4,701 11,659 4,534 554 80Weighted average maturity (months)1 25.55 77.48 20.68 24.42 16.89 22.66 13.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.45 13.94 8.83 6.20 2.84 3.26 .

Weighted average risk rating3 3.03 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 8.59 8.69 8.91 8.68 8.68 8.94 8.2 Standard error5 .10 .27 .17 .13 .12 .42 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.39 9.69 9.47 9.44 9.65 9.77 8.2 25th percentile 7.76 8.22 8.42 7.87 8.03 8.03 8.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.42 9.09 8.73 8.37 7.97 8.15 8.2 Other livestock 8.89 8.51 9.34 8.91 8.13 7.85 n Other current operating expenses7 8.86 8.42 9.04 8.90 8.68 9.29 9.2

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.99 9.47 9.07 9.19 8.69 9.11 8.9 Farm real estate 8.09 8.32 8.15 7.93 8.42 11.85 8.4 Other8 8.24 9.32 8.04 8.04 8.95 8.32 8.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 74.30 42.06 65.16 72.91 94.85 96.72 95.2 Under commitment 73.79 57.47 78.53 77.91 75.83 91.76 96. Callable 22.15 19.54 24.64 18.94 29.16 16.99 8.7 Subject to prepayment penalty 2.01 n.a. n.a. 4.88 .34 2.22 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 12.97 33.58 22.05 5.57 7.95 1.25 19.9 Other livestock 11.73 4.25 16.02 17.01 7.91 11.15 n Other current operating expenses7 32.73 20.48 47.60 40.90 27.57 68.53 5.0 Farm machinery and equipment 8.04 6.67 2.55 11.41 10.77 .32 .9 Farm real estate 6.86 34.50 8.35 5.40 4.30 .20 . Other8 27.67 .51 3.42 19.72 41.50 18.56 73.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.58 33.23 16.42 14.78 6.68 4.92 4. Other 78.27 66.77 78.71 79.33 72.41 93.86 94. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending December 4, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCARPENTER FUND MANAGER GP, LLC                                                                                          4c8
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 878 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 17, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the 
Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any 
point of order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion 
offered by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that 
the House concur in the Senate amendment with each of the two House amendments 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 
shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question except that the 
question of adoption of the motion shall be divided between the two House 
amendments.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of the motion to concur pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the motion to such time as may be 
designated by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, August 3-7, 20Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 986,843 21,400 73,681 382,356 339,818 87,520 1,054 Number of loans 17,732 378 1,652 8,008 3,977 1,013 75 Weighted average maturity (months)1 14.82 16.54 18.70 14.98 16.85 6.18 30.09 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 5.16 14.81 9.02 4.11 6.89 .22 29.03 

Weighted average risk rating3 3.44 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate 4 4.47 5.99 5.37 4.59 3.98 4.03 7.06 

 Standard error5 .23 .41 .28 .51 .38 .57 .55 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.83 6.72 6.18 6.00 5.05 4.75 7.76  25th percentile 3.07 5.07 5.06 3.07 2.66 2.91 5.38  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.18 5.88 4.52 4.09 2.94 n.a. 4.93  Other livestock 7.79 6.12 4.74 3.07 3.78 6.61 n.a Other current operating expenses7 6.24 5.12 5.25 4.45 4.29 6.50 5.56 

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.38 5.97 5.33 4.77 3.15 6.68 5.08  Farm real estate n.a. 5.53 4.66 3.84 n.a. n.a. 5.62  Other8 2.82 4.45 3.34 3.38 4.46 7.47 2.48 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 83.89 24.15 71.02 79.92 90.29 96.01 17.63  Under commitment 82.28 51.15 64.14 87.13 88.74 98.62 13.91  Callable 15.12 42.26 15.31 26.56 5.67 .87 9.29  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.57 26.01 28.58 3.50 1.66 12.59 n.a Other livestock 8.89 2.01 .63 1.49 17.63 24.11 5.58  Other current operating expenses7 53.79 52.48 55.89 55.92 53.59 36.48 14.81 

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.31 18.55 3.51 3.56 4.73 .96 26.95  Farm real estate 2.51 n.a. 6.56 4.09 .88 n.a. n.a Other8 22.93 .94 4.82 31.44 21.52 25.85 52.66 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.14 13.42 28.28 17.13 8.31 3.63 35.79  Other 84.69 85.66 65.46 80.26 90.13 96.06 58.63  Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.