alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 867 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 6, 2008.
Whereas the Houston Dynamo soccer team won the 2007 Major League Soccer Cup, 
        defeating the New England Revolution by a score of 2-1 at RFK Stadium on 
        November 18, 2007;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo came back from a 1-0 halftime deficit to defeat 
        the Revolution;
Whereas as Dwayne De Rosario, assisted on the tying goal to Joseph Ngwenya, 
        scored the winning goal and was named the game's MVP;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo were playing without Brian Ching, the MVP of last 
        year's MLS Cup due to injury;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo has won the Major League Soccer Cup for the second 
        consecutive year;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo is the first team to win back-to-back MLS Cups in 
        10 years;
Whereas as the Houston Dynamo have won the MLS Cup in their first 2 years of 
        existence in Houston;
Whereas Houston Dynamo Coach Dominic Kinnear has guided the team to 26 wins, 20 
        draws, and 16 losses in his first 2 seasons in Houston; and
Whereas Houston Dynamo defender Eddie Robinson and midfielder Dwayne De Rosario 
        were named to the 2007 MLS Best XI all-star team: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Houston Dynamo soccer team for winning the 2007 MLS 
        Cup; and
            (2) congratulates the team for back-to-back MLS Cup wins in their 
        first 2 seasons in Houston.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
(July 25, 2002)

#### Michael Fillas, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Nicholas Fillas, et al., Appellants, v Hyon Mun Cho et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d 427]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered on or about March 30, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to restore this action to the calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. Appeal from order, same court (Milton Tingling, J.), entered on or about September 26, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to renew and reargue their previously denied motion to restore, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as no appeal lies from the denial of reargument and the appeal is otherwise academic in light of our reversal of the prior order.

The evidence demonstrates that plaintiffs’ case was not marked off, struck from the calendar, or unanswered on a clerk’s calendar call, but rather was marked “disposed,” through no fault of plaintiffs, as a result of a clerk’s error. Its dismissal was therefore a nullity, and the subsequent refusal to restore the action to the calendar was error *(see, Novaro v Jomar Real Estate Corp.,*283 AD2d 352). Under the circumstances, the usual prerequisites for restoration were not applicable *(see, Beringer v B.C.P. Mgt. Corp.,*280 AD2d 414, 415).

Contrary to defendants’ claims, there is no evidence that the motion court made any favorable ruling with respect to their cross motions, in which they argued that plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed because they failed to commence their wrongful death action within two years, in accordance with the requirements of EPTL 5-4.1. Accordingly, the merits of those cross motions are not before this Court. Were we, however, to *357consider the merits of those cross motions, we would find that the remedial provisions of CPLR 205 (a) would permit revival of plaintiffs’ otherwise time-barred cause of action, since a prior timely action, however flawed, actually was “commenced” within the meaning of CPLR 304 *(see, Carrick v Central Gen. Hosp.,*51 NY2d 242, 249). Concur — Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending June 20, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOMMERCIAL AND SAVINGS BANK OF MILLERSBURG, OHIO, THE                                                                   * BranchThe Commercial & Savings Bank of Millersburg, Millersburg, OH to establish a branch at 330 West High Street, Orrville, OH.Newspaper: 06/25/2009Federal Register: Not applicableFNB, INC.                                                                                                               CICInteragency Notices of Change in Bank Control filed by the following immediate family members of the Hillyer Family Control Group and related controlling interests: Hudson Hillyer, Hudson Hillyer Trust (Hudson Hillyer, Trustee),Marie Hillyer Trust (Hudson Hillyer, Trustee), Carole Hillyer, Majorie Shelley, David Shelley, Blair Hillyer, Brad Hillyer, Beth Hillyer, Rebecca Hillyer, Brett Hillyer, Aaron Hillyer, Alec Hillyer, Katherine Hillyer, Jacob Hillyer, and The Clay City Pipe Company, Uhrichsville, Ohio;  The Bowerston Shale Company, Bowerston, Ohio, and Fab Ohio, Uhrichsville, Ohio; to acquire 10 percent or more of the outstanding voting shares of FNB, Inc., Dennison, OHNewspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending March 25, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCORNERSTONE HOLDING COMPANY, INC.                                                                                       * 3A1Cornerstone Holding Company, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of Citizens, Incorporated, Enderlin, North Dakota and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens State Bank, Enderlin, North Dakota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/23/2006FORSTROM BANCORPORATION, INC.                                                                                           * 3A3Forstrom Bancorporation, Inc., Clara City, Minnesota, to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Yellow Medicine Bancshares, Inc., Granite Falls, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Yellow Medicine County Bank, Granite Falls, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/17/2006FSB BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 3A1FSB Bancorp, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Farmers State Bank of Turton, South Dakota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/21/2006JAG FINANCIAL, INC.                                                                                                     * 3A1JAG Financial, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The EastBank Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire 100 percent of EastBank, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/23/2006LAKE BANK SHARES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN                                                                    * 3A3Lake Bank Shares, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Emmons, Minnesota, proposes to increase its ownership of Lake Bank Shares, Inc., Emmons, Minnesota, from 35.68 percent to 65.67 percent.Newspaper: 04/05/2006Federal Register: 04/06/2006VISION BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                 4c8Retroactive Notice by Vision Bancshares, Inc., Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, to engage de novo in extending credit and servicing loans.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: 04/10/2006
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2006...... 67.9 7.4 6.4 30.3 7.9 15.8 2.8 5.4 14.0 45.7 2007...... 64.8 5.6 5.6 32.5 5.5 15.6 2.7 5.7 14.8 41.6 2008...... 77.6 5.6 7.4 40.2 3.8 20.7 2.5 5.7 15.1 54.4 2009...... 70.9 6.1 5.0 40.9 4.3 14.7 2.5 5.4 14.8 48.2 2006: Q3... 63.5 9.2 7.3 21.8 5.2 20.0 2.6 5.6 12.2 43.2  Q4... 60.8 10.0 6.1 24.5 5.4 14.8 2.3 4.7 14.1 39.7 2007: Q1... 69.6 5.9 5.3 40.0 3.5 14.9 2.3 4.8 13.4 49.1  Q2... 61.7 3.7 4.1 35.0 5.4 13.5 3.4 6.8 16.2 35.3  Q3... 53.6 3.3 4.9 23.9 7.5 14.1 2.6 5.4 13.1 32.4  Q4... 74.4 9.3 8.3 31.2 5.5 20.1 2.7 5.7 16.3 49.7 2008: Q1... 83.7 6.6 5.9 47.7 3.2 20.3 2.3 5.6 14.0 61.9  Q2... 76.7 4.5 6.3 39.4 5.8 20.7 2.9 5.6 16.5 51.6  Q3... 69.1 3.3 7.6 35.3 3.9 19.0 2.4 5.3 12.8 48.5  Q4... 81.1 8.0 9.7 38.5 2.3 22.6 2.6 6.1 17.0 55.4 2009: Q1... 96.4 5.9 5.5 63.8 4.8 16.5 2.3 5.3 15.9 72.9  Q2... 61.9 3.8 4.2 37.9 2.9 13.2 2.7 5.6 14.9 38.7  Q3... 55.9 4.4 5.5 29.6 3.1 13.3 2.7 5.3 13.5 34.4  Q4... 69.4 10.2 4.7 32.3 6.3 15.8 2.2 5.6 14.6 47.0 2010: Q1... 65.7 5.6 4.0 39.9 4.1 12.1 2.1 4.7 15.0 43.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending November 19, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAMERICAN TRUST & SAVINGS BANK                                                                                           * BranchAmerican Trust & Savings Bank, Dubuque, Iowa, to establish a branch at 7204 University Avenue, Windsor Heights, Iowa.Newspaper: 11/15/2016Federal Register: Not applicableARBOR BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                     * 3A5Arbor Bancorp, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, to acquire via merger 100 percent of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc., Birmingham, Michigan, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of Birmingham, Birmingham, Michigan.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/14/2016CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE                                                                                      * 3A1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending January 4, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodTAIPEI FUBON COMMERCIAL BANK CO., LTD.                                                                                  FBSEATaipei Fubon Commercial Bank Co., Ltd,  Taipei, Taiwan, requests to establish a representative office in San Jose, California,  pursuant to section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
#### Judith D. Arnold, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[745 NYS2d 26]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered November 23, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint.

In this personal injury action, plaintiff alleged that she tripped on broken floor tiles in the apartment of a friend, Bobbie Bowles, the tenant of record of defendant New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). Claiming lack of actual or constructive notice of a tile defect, NYCHA moved for summary judgment relying, in part, upon testimony of a maintenance worker who said that he had been in the Bowles apartment “maybe five times” prior to the date of the accident, did not see any broken tiles and Bowles had not complained about any such defect. To establish a prima facie case for a dangerous condition, the plaintiff must prove that defendant either created or had notice of the condition *(see, Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp.,*84 NY2d 967; *Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*99 AD2d 246, *affd*64 NY2d 670). Where, as here, there is no allegation that defendant created such condition, there must be proof in admissible form that defendant had constructive notice of a defect which “must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendant’s employees to discover and remedy it” *(Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837). NYCHA satisfied its burden of establishing a lack of constructive notice through the testimony of the maintenance worker, and through the affidavit from the building’s housing assistant that there was no record in the file of any complaints *356regarding broken tiles on or before the date of the accident. The burden then shifted to plaintiff, who merely submitted hearsay statements of Bowles to plaintiff as recounted in plaintiffs deposition and to plaintiffs attorney as reiterated in his affirmation. Although hearsay evidence may be considered in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, it is insufficient to bar summary judgment if it is the only evidence submitted *(Narvaez v NYRAC,*290 AD2d 400, 400-401; *see, Guzman v L.M.P. Realty Corp.,*262 AD2d 99, 100; *Thomas v Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr.,*289 AD2d 37, 38). Furthermore, the possibility of Bowles, now a nonresident of the state, appearing at trial to give testimony in admissible form is now foreclosed by a separate preclusion order. Concur — Tom, J.P., Buckley, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Exhibit 23(i)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community Bancorp. of our report dated February 22, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community Bancorp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-127024) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44713) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated February 22, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/Berry, Dunn McNeil & Parker

Portland, Maine
#### The State, ex rel. O’Dell et al., *v.*Allen, Judge.

(No. 25033

— Decided October 24, 1934.)

*Messrs. Lease & Lease, Mr. Eldon H. Young*and *Mr. Roy Warren Roof,*for relators.

*Mr. Harry I. Kaylor,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard upon the petition of the relators for a writ of prohibition and the demurrer thereto and was argued by counsel.

Relators pray that the Court of Common Pleas be prohibited from proceeding with the hearing and de*567termination of criminal prosecutions, the petition alleging that relators object to the jurisdiction of the Common Pleas Court because: the grand jury failed to consider and return indictments during the term of court at which relators were bound to appear while most of them were confined in the county jail; the grand jury was not properly constituted; the grand jury discriminated against relators by indicting other persons, while most of the relators were confined in the county jail; the failure of the grand jury to indict relators at the term of court at which they were bound to' appear constituted an abatement of the offense charged; the grand jury at a subsequent term was without jurisdiction to inquire into the alleged offenses and render indictments thereon; and that the Court of Common Pleas is without jurisdiction to try these relators upon such indictments.

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the demurrer be, and the same hereby is, sustained. The writ of prohibition does not lie where there is another regular, ordinary and adequate remedy, and prohibition is not an appropriate remedy for the correction of error and does not lie to prevent an erroneous decision in a case which a court is authorized to adjudicate.. *State, ex rel. Nolan,*v. *Clen Dening,*93 Ohio St., 264; *State, ex rel. Garrison,*v. *Brough,*94 Ohio St., 115; *Kelley, Judge,*v. *State, ex rel. Gellner,*94 Ohio St., 331; *Silliman*v. *Court of Common Pleas of Williams County,*126 Ohio St., 338.

It is also ordered and adjudged that the relators be granted twenty days to plead further and if no amended petition be filed .within such time this action is ordered dismissed at the relators ’ costs.

*Decree accordbingly.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin Brown, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 368]

Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Maloy, J.), entered August 17, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of grand larceny in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: We agree with defendant that the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because it was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent. During the plea colloquy, County Court stated, “And you’re waiving your right to appeal on this matter,” and defendant responded, “Yes.” That single reference to defendant’s right to appeal is insufficient to establish that the court “engage [d] the defendant in an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a knowing and voluntary choice” *(People v Kemp,*255 AD2d 397, 397; *see People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 283; *cf. People v Torres,*236 AD2d 642, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1041; *People v Coleman*[appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827). Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, however, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present — Pine, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2006: Q4... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.7

2007: Q1... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.7

 Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

 Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

 Q4... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.2

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2006: Q4... 9.5 9.6 9.3 8.7

2007: Q1... 9.4 9.7 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

 Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 6.9 7.2 6.8

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2006: Q4... 9.3 9.3 8.9 8.4

2007: Q1... 9.1 9.0 8.6 8.3

 Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q4... 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.9
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q4... n.a. 9.2 9.0 8.4

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.0 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.9 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.6

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2006: Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.1 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 7.0 6.8

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT 32.1

The following certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. The certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report
of MSC.Software Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ashfaq A. Munshi, interim Chief
Executive Officer & President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ ASHFAQ A. MUNSHI                       
|                     |  |     |  | ASHFAQ A. MUNSHI                           
|                     |  |     |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer & President
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)