alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00019
- CV

__________________ MARIA CONCEPCION DELGADO , Appellant
V.
LUIS GOVEA LOPEZ , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. CIV33210

__________________________________________________________________ ORDER Maria Concepcion Delgado , a ppellant, filed a statement of inability to afford payment of costs in the trial court. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Luis Govea Lopez,

a

ppellee, objected that Delgado provided no financial information in her statement. Delgado appeared at a hearing on June 14, 2021. Delgado stated she did not have any “federal reserve notes” and she had “rights of subrogation.” The trial court informed Delgado that stating “pri vate” for every entry on the statement of inability to afford payment of court costs provided no information o n which the trial court could find that Delgado could not afford payment of court costs. Delgado replied,2 “I’m letting you know there’s a trust in volved.” On June 14, 2020, the trial court found that Delgado did not offer any financial information to support her statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. Delgado challenges the trial court’s ruling on the ground that the trial court
f

ailed to respond to a “form 1020” that Delgado filed with the Polk County District Clerk on May 20, 2021. Delgado has not shown that the “form 1020” was filed with the proper clerk or provided to the trial court in the hearing, but in any event the informa tion on the “form 1020” is no evidence of Delgado’s eligibility for public benefits, income, sources of income, property, or monthly expenses

. On this record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding that a ppellant failed to carry her burden under Rule 145. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(f). We deny a ppellant’s motion to challenge and affirm the trial court’s order to
pay costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(g). Appellant shall pay or make satisfactory

a rrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date of this Order. Her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay that are satisfactory with th e court reporter will result in the appeal being submitted without a reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).
ORDER ENTERED August 23 , 2021.
PER CURIAM Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Steven Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006
|                        | 
|BY:                     |  | /s/ Steven Strasser                 
|                        |  | Steven Strasser                     
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
(July 15, 2002)

#### Jennis Adams, Respondent, v City of Poughkeepsie, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 203]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 31, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff was injured after she fell in a large depression *469next to a storm drainage grate and catch basin she alleged was located between 99 Cannon Street and 105 Cannon Street in the City of Poughkeepsie. She commenced this action against the City, claiming, inter alia, that the City was negligent in maintaining the catch basin area.

In response to the plaintiffs claim, an employee of the City Department of Public Works stated at an examination before trial that she conducted a search which produced no record of any complaints or notices of defects with respect to Cannon Street, written notice of which is required in order for the City to be held liable for damages for personal injuries *(see*Poughkeepsie City Charter § 15.03). Where a municipality establishes that it has not received the requisite written notice, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to submit competent evidence that the municipality affirmatively created the defect (see *Gianna v Town of Islip,*230 AD2d 824, 825; *Rosenthal v Village of Quogue,*205 AD2d 745; *Kaempf v Town of Hempstead,*170 AD2d 652). The plaintiff failed to offer any evidence that the City received prior written notice of the defect, or affirmatively created the defect.

Accordingly, the City’s motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and McGinity, JJ., concur.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 898 

Recognizing the State of Minnesota’s 150th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mrs. BACHMANN (for herself, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. PETERSON of 

Minnesota, Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. RAMSTAD, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, and Mr. OBERSTAR) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the State of Minnesota’s 150th anniversary. 

Whereas Minnesota was established as a territory on March 

2, 1849, and became the 32nd State on May 11, 1858; 

Whereas Minnesota is also known as the ‘‘Gopher State’’, the 

‘‘North Star State’’, and the ‘‘Land of 10,000 Lakes’’; 

Whereas Minnesota’s name comes from the Dakota word 

‘‘minesota’’, meaning ‘‘water that reflects the sky’’, and 

Native Americans continue to play a defining role in Minnesota’s proud heritage; 

Whereas the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul were established after the completion of nearby Fort Snelling, a 

frontier outpost and training center for Civil War soldiers; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 898 IH 

Whereas in 1889, the Saint Mary’s Hospital, now known as 

the Mayo Clinic, opened its doors to patients in Rochester, Minnesota, and is now known worldwide for its cutting-edge care; 

Whereas Minnesota continues to be a leader in innovation 

and is currently home to more than 35 Fortune 500 

Companies; 

Whereas Minnesota houses over 30 institutions of higher education including the University of Minnesota, a worldclass research university where the first open heart surgery and first bone marrow transplant was performed in 

the United States; 

Whereas farmland spans over half of Minnesota’s 54 million 

acres and the agriculture industry is Minnesota’s second 

largest job market, employing nearly 80,000 farmers; 

Whereas Minnesota is the Nation’s number one producer of 

sugarbeets and turkeys; 

Whereas Minnesota is a national leader in the production and 

use of renewable energy, which helps our Nation reduce 

its dependency on foreign sources of oil; 

Whereas the Mall of America located in Bloomington, Minnesota, is the Nation’s largest retail and entertainment 

complex, spanning 9,500,000 square feet and providing 

more than 11,000 jobs; 

Whereas Minnesota has 90,000 miles of lake and river shoreline, which includes the coast of Lake Superior, the largest of North America’s Great Lakes; 

Whereas the Minneapolis-St. Paul area is nationally recognized for its parks, museums, and cultural events; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 898 IH 

Whereas the people of Minnesota have a timeless reputation 

of compassion, strength, and determination: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the State of Minnesota on its 150th anniversary 

3 and the contributions it continues to make to America’s 

4 economy and heritage. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K into the following Registration
Statements of Lafarge Corporation previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission: (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 2-92414,
(ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8, Form 33-9813, (iii) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-32645, (iv) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-32644 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 6
to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (v) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-20865, (vi) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-46093 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 7
of Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), and (vii)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-51873.





                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 29, 1996
Exhibit 32



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Emory B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Emory B. LewisEmory B. Lewis, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Elaine S. KendrickElaine S. Kendrick, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




November 14, 2005



23
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
                                December 31, 2005

The following significant subsidiaries are consolidated in the financial
statements submitted as a part of this report:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Jurisdiction of   Percentage of Voting
                                          Incorporation      Securities Owned
                                         ---------------   --------------------
<S>                                      <C>               <C>
Controlled by Campbell Resources Inc.:
   Meston Resources Inc.                      Quebec               100%
   MSV Resources Inc.                         Quebec               100%
   GeoNova Explorations Inc.                  Canada               100%
   Sotula Gold Corporation Inc.               Canada               100%
Controlled by Meston Resources Inc.
   Meston Investments Limited             Cayman Islands           100%
</TABLE>
MODIFICATION NUMBER TWO

   Pursuant to our production Contract of February 13, 1995, the
   requirements of Article Three Subsection C are waived for the months of
   October, November, and December, 1996.

   The requirements of Article Three Subsection C remain in force through
   the remainder of the term of the Production Contract.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF

   The undersigned parties have duly executed this modification to their
   agreement on the date last written below.



   CARRINGTON LABORATORIES, INC.           OREGON FREEZE DRY, INC.

   By:/S/Luiz Cerqueira                    By:/S/Philip A. Unverzagt

   Name: Luiz Cerqueira                    Name: Philip A. Unverzagt

   Title: VP Oper./Mfg. & L.A. Sales       Title: Sr. VP/CFO

   Date: 11/19/96                          Date: 11/11/96
<PAGE>
Opinion filed April 21, 2022

 

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-21-00106-CR

__________

DARYL WAYNE WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 244th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-18-1072-CR

 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Daryl Wayne Wright of the offense of assault family 

violence by impeding breathing. Appellant pled true to two enhancement

allegations, and the jury assessed his punishment at imprisonment for thirty years. 

We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to 

withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that there are 
2

no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of 

the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record 

and the reporter’srecord. Counsel advised Appellant of hisright to review the record 

and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to

file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed 

counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991). 

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. Following the 

procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the 

record, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.1

 

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the 

trial court. 

PER CURIAM

April 21, 2022

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to Rule 68 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Exhibit 10(iv)

DIRECTOR'S RETIREMENT PLAN

 

 

     Directors who have served on the Board of the Company and/or the Bank for at least five years and who are not salaried employees of the Bank are entitled to receive upon retirement from the Board a lump sum payment of $1,000 for each year of Board service.  For this purpose, service rendered as a director of the Company and of the Bank is not compensated separately.  The retirement benefits under this arrangement represent a general unsecured obligation of the Company and no assets of the Company or the Bank have been segregated to satisfy the Company's obligations under the arrangement.
Exhibit 10.20


 


INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT


 


This Indemnification Agreement (“Agreement”)
is entered into effective April 25th, 2004, by and between CityNet
Telecommunications, Inc. (“CityNet”) and Universal Access Global Holdings, Inc.
(“UAX”).


 


WHEREAS, UAX is contractually obligated to
reimburse CityNet for all lease and related payments to be made under the real
estate lease (the “Lease”) relating to CityNet’s and UAX’s office space at 8405
Colesville Road, 6th Floor, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910; and


 


WHEREAS, UAX is negotiating with Trizec Hahn
(the “Landlord”) to restructure UAX’s obligations under the Lease and other
real estate leases; and


 


WHEREAS, in connection with such
negotiations, UAX has requested that CityNet refrain from making certain payments
under the Lease; and


 


WHEREAS, CityNet wishes to be indemnified for
all costs, fees, damages, etc... relating to any such withheld lease payments;
and


 


IT IS THEREFORE AGREED THAT:


 


(1)                                  CityNet shall withhold Lease payments
beginning with the payment due on May 1, 2004 until either party hereto
provides written notice to the other party terminating this Agreement.  Any payment or indemnification obligations
arising hereunder pursuant to sections (2) and/or (3) below shall survive any
such termination.


 


(2)                                  UAX hereby reaffirms its contractual
obligation to reimburse CityNet for all payments of any kind to be made
pursuant to the Lease, including late Lease payments, payments made pursuant to
legal action taken by the Landlord and/or payments made in connection with a
settlement with the Landlord.


 


(3)                                  In addition, UAX hereby agrees to
indemnify and hold CityNet harmless from all claims, losses, expenses, fees
(including without limitation CityNet’s attorney fees and any attorney fees,
costs, and judgments that may be asserted against CityNet) and damages of any
kind that result from the acts/omissions contemplated herein.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound, the parties have
executed this Agreement effective on the date first written above.


 


 


	
  CITYNET TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Edward A. Frantz

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:  Edward A. Frantz

  	
   

  
	
  Title:  SVP & General
  Counsel

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  UNIVERSAL ACCESS GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Brian W. Coderre

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:  Brian W. Coderre

  	
   

  
	
  Title:  CFO
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued019355NF
ABAD Air, Inc., 14011 N.W. 28th Street, Miami, FL 33172
July 2, 2008.020273N
APA Logistics, LLC, 545 Dowd Avenue, Elizabeth, NJ 07201
July 10, 2008.018305N
MC Logix, Inc., 18030 S. Figueroa Street, Gardena, CA 90248
August 12, 2008.020303N
Panda Logistics USA, Inc., 19600 S. Alameda Street, Suite 1, E. Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221
August 15, 2008.018234N
Savant International Logistics Ltd., 11 Broadway, Suite 1068, New York, NY 10004
July 12, 2008.015847N
Straightline Logistics, Inc., One Cross Island Plaza, Suite 203-G, Rosedale, NY 11422
August 14, 2008.021036F
Tiffany-Michele Nakano,  dba Accord Relocations, 67 Lockheed Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89183
July 23, 2008.020151F
United Global Logistics, LLC, 1139 E. Jersey Street, Ste. 417, Elizabeth, NJ 07201
July 2, 2008.003615N
Unitrans Consolidated Inc., 180-02 Eastgate Plaza, Jamaica, NY 11434
August 10, 2008.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E8-23162 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Renewal of Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 RENEWAL OF 
  
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
  
 WILLIAM J. REUTER AND 
  
 SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC. 
  
 As of February 28, 2004, the employment of William J. Reuter is hereby deemed to be renewed for three (3) years under the terms and conditions per the Employment Agreement dated March 12, 2001 (but effective as
of February 28, 2001), as amended. 
  
 The base salary as per
Section 4.1 will be $541,190.00 per year. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.

	 Attest:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	 /s/ Lisa M. Cavage

	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.


	 Secretary and Counsel
	 	 	 	 Edward Balderston, Jr.

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 EVP & Chief Administrative Officer

				
	 [SEAL]
EXHIBIT  32.2


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
This certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Pizza Inn, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended June 27, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and is
given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The
undersigned,  in  my  capacity  as  set  forth  below,  hereby  certifies  that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

1.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September  24,  2004          By: /s/  Shawn  M.  Preator

                                     Chief  Financial  Officer



<PAGE>
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 16–1126 

JEFFREY D'AGOSTINO, 

Plaintiff, Appellant, 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; 

STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF GEORGIA; STATE OF HAWAII; STATE OF 

ILLINOIS; STATE OF INDIANA; STATE OF LOUISIANA; STATE OF 

MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF MICHIGAN; 

STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE; STATE 

OF NEW JERSEY; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF 

NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE 

OF TENNESSEE; STATE OF TEXAS; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STATE OF 

WISCONSIN; JOHN DOE; UNITED STATES; STATE OF DELAWARE; STATE OF 

MINNESOTA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

EV3, INC.; MICROTHERAPEUTICS, INC., 

Defendants, Appellees, 

JOHN CUBELIC; VITAS J. SIPELIS; JOHN HARDIN; BRETT WALL, 

Defendants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on December 23, 2016, is 

amended as follows: 

 On page 8, line 17, the word "Center" is replaced with 

"Centers." 

 On page 20, line 12, the word "approval" is replaced with 

"approved."