alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1






              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.











May 15, 2003                            /s/ RICHARD J. LAMPEN
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Richard J. Lampen
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

I, Steven Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2006



|    |  |                                        
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------
|    | 
|BY: |  | /s/ Steven Strasser                    
|    |  | Steven Strasser Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... n.a. 28 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .062 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending June 16, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFARMERS BANCORP INC.                                                                                                    CICNotice by Gaylon M. Lawrence, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, to gain control of Farmers Bancorp, Inc., Blytheville, Arkansas.Newspaper: 07/10/2007Federal Register: 06/27/2007FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION                                                                                      * 3A3First Horizon National Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee, and its subsidiary bank, First Tennesse National Association, Memphis, Tennessee, to acquire 100 percent of Centerville State Bank, Centerville, Kansas.Newspaper: 07/13/2007Federal Register: Not availableLAWRENCEBURG NATIONAL BANK, THE                                                                                         MemberLawrenceburg National Bank, Harrodsburg, Kentucky, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableMERCANTILE BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                * 3A3Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., Quincy, Illinois, to acquire 100 percent of HNB Financial Services, Inc., Hannibal, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire HNB National Bank, Hannibal, Missouri.Newspaper: 07/11/2007Federal Register: 07/13/2007NORTHERN HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                                                 3A1Northern Holdings, Inc., Kahoka, Missouri, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Kahoka State Bank, Kahoka, Missouri.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicablePEOPLES BANK & TRUST CO.                                                                                                * 18C
201 La. 915

#### DICKERSON v. HUDSON.

No. 36854.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1942.

C. B. Prothro, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Cook, Lee, Clark & Egan, of Shreveport, for appellee.

McCALEB, Justice.

The plaintiff and appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appellant has failed to perfect it within one year after the judgment was signed by the timely filing of the appeal bond fixed by the judge. The judgment appealed from was rendered, read and signed in open court on July 8th, 1941. A devolutive appeal was applied for on June 23, 1942, and an order granting the appeal and fixing the bond was signed on that day. However, the appeal was not perfected by the filing of the bond until July 25, 1942, or over one year after the rendition and signing of the judgment.

It is the established jurisprudence of this State that “The time limit of one year, allowed by article 593 of the Code of Practice, for the taking of a devolutive appeal, is the limit of time in which the taking of the appeal must be completed by the filing of the appeal bond, in cases where a bond is required by law and by the order granting the appeal, * * * ”. See Mount Olive Baptist Church v. New Zion Baptist Church, 198 La. 896, 5 So.2d 144, and authorities there cited.

It is, therefore, obvious in this case Lhat, since the appeal was not perfected by the filing of bond within the year elapsing *701from the finality of the judgment below, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

ROGERS, J., absent.
#### ROBY MOTORS COMPANY, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M. C. STEVENS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 4520.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 31, 1933.

C. B. Prothro, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Freyer, of Shreveport, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

Defendant appealed devolutively from a judgment against him for $588.51, with 8 per cent, per annum interest from September 12, 1931, and 15 per cent, on said amount as attorney’s fees, with recognition of plaintiff’s chattel mortgage on the truck sequestered herein and described in its petition.

The order of appeal was granted in open court November 23, 1932, and return day fixed for December 19th, following. Appeal bond was filed December 13, 1932. The record was not filed in this court, however, until January 5, 1932.

Plaintiff, appellee, filed motion to dismiss the appeal because the transcript in the case was not filed in this court within the delay fixed by law and the rules of this court. There is no suggestion that the failure to file the transcript timely is imputable to either the appellee or the clerk of the lower court. The motion is well taken; and this appeal is dismissed at cost of defendant-appellant.

MILLS, J.( recused.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

v.

Paul J . Barbadoro, et al

Civil No. 06-cv-458-GZS

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve and adopt

the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kravchuk dated January 24,

2007. The complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

SO ORDERED.

February 13, 2007 /s/George Z. Singal____________

George Z. Singal

Chief Judge, Sitting by Designation

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

Case 1:06-cv-00458-GZS Document 17 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Kearney, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 885]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered September 10, 2003, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

*623Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Since the defendant affirmatively requested that the trier of fact consider manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense in this case, he should not now be heard to complain that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support a conviction of that charge *(see People v Ferguson,*178 AD2d 149 [1991]; *see generally People v Walden,*227 AD2d 887 [1996]; *People v Alvarado,*213 AD2d 1013 [1995]). Additionally, the defendant’s current challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to advance his present arguments as a basis for dismissal in the trial court *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Lumpkins,*11 AD3d 563 [2004]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Staples,*19 AD3d 1096 [2005]; *People v Butler,*17 AD3d 379 [2005]; *People v Davis,*277 AD2d 248 [2000]; *People v Dennis,*210 AD2d 803 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending June 25, 2022

----

Bank Holding Companies            Bank First Corporation, Manitowoc, Wisconsin -- to merge with Denmark Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Denmark State Bank, both of Denmark, Wisconsin.            -Approved, June 22, 2022            Personnel            Division of Board Members -- appointment of Terrence Fischer as special assistant to the Board.            -Approved, June 15, 2022            (A/C)                      Division of Information Technology -- appointment of Stephen Olden and Andrew Krug as deputy directors.            -Announced, June 22, 2022            Regulations and Policies            Fedwire Funds Service -- notice of the Federal Reserve Banks' adoption of a new Fedwire Funds Service message format, ISO® 20022, on March 10, 2025.            -Approved, June 21, 2022            Enforcement            Evolve Bank & Trust, West Memphis, Arkansas -- consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act.            -Announced, June 21, 2022                        Golden Pacific Bancorp, Inc., Sacramento, California -- consent order of prohibition against Karl K. Klessig, a former institution-affiliated party.            -Announced, June 24, 2022                        North American Banking Company, Roseville, Minnesota -- consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act.            -Announced, June 21, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed January 

26, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00620-CV

JANICE KINSEL, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

RICHARD L. KINSEL, JR., Appellant

V.

RUSSELL BURKETT, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-0079139-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal of an order signed August 18, 2022 granting temporary 

injunctive relief. On January 4, 2023, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal

“with prejudice” as the parties have settled all matters of controversy between and 

among them. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure speak only of dismissal of 
2

an appeal; neither “with prejudice” nor “without prejudice” is appended to the 

word “dismissal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We construe the motion as one for 

voluntary dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). So 

construed, the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,802]


Shorewood Packaging Corporation, a Subsidiary of International 
Paper, Home Entertainment Division, Edison, NJ; Notice of Negative 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On July 16, 2008, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on July 28, 2008 (73 FR 43787).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of printed paper primarily for music 
and gaming packaging did not contribute importantly to worker 
separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign 
source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration the petitioner provided an 
additional list of customers, who purchased packaging products for the 
pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries.
    On reconsideration the Department of Labor contacted the company 
official of the subject firm to verify the information addressed by the 
petitioner and requested an additional list of customers. The 
Department surveyed these customers regarding their purchases of like 
or directly competitive products with printed paper for packaging 
during 2006, 2007, and January through February 2008 over the 
corresponding 2007 period. The survey revealed that only one customer 
imported printed paper for packaging, however imports by this customer 
have been declining during the relevant period. The remaining customers 
did not import like or directly competitive products with printed paper 
for packaging during the relevant period.
    The petitioner also alleged that Shorewood Packaging Corporation 
``had plans to open new facilities in Europe and Asia'' and that 
Shorewood Packaging was outsourcing jobs from the subject firm 
overseas.
    The company official of the subject firm confirmed that Shorewood 
Packaging Corporation has facilities abroad and described the functions 
of each facility. However, the company official stated that there was 
no shift in production from the subject firm to any foreign facility in 
the relevant period. The company official clarified that the reason 
behind the closure of the subject firm was the change in the market for 
the products manufactured by the Edison facility.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Shorewood Packaging Corporation, a 
subsidiary of International Paper, Home Entertainment Division, Edison, 
New Jersey.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of September 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-22402 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-86-01-SM

Carl Taylor

O R D E R

Defendant Taylor’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 15). Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2007

trial period. Defendant Taylor shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than June 15, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: June 27, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: July 10, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00086-SM Document 16 Filed 06/04/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 4, 2007

cc: James W. Dennehy, Esq.

Jennifer Cole, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00086-SM Document 16 Filed 06/04/07 Page 2 of 2
Seventh Amendment to Interactive Television System Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 THE MARKED PORTIONS OF THIS AMENDMENT HAVE BEEN OMITTED 
 AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 
 A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 
  
 April 21, 2004 
  
 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL/FIRST CLASS MAIL 
  
 Mr. Myles Cyr 
 Carnival Corporation 
 3655 NW 87th Avenue 
 Miami, FL 33178 
  
 Re: Seventh Amendment to Interactive Television System Agreement dated February 20, 2001, by and between Allin Interactive Corporation and Carnival Cruise Lines (hereinafter “Fourth Amendment”) 

 
 Dear Myles: 
  
 This letter is to amend the Interactive Television System Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated February 20, 2001, by and between
Allin Interactive Corporation (“Allin”) and Carnival Cruise Lines (“CCL”). Capitalized terms shall have the meaning as set forth in Section 1 of that Agreement. 
  
 Whereas, Section 9.2 of the Agreement set forth terms for support services; and 
  
 Whereas, the parties desire to amend Section 9.2 effective April 1, 2004; 
  
 Now, therefore, Section 9.2 – Support Services shall read as follows: 
  
 (a) During the Warranty Period, for support services which are not covered by
the warranty of performance pursuant to in Section 9.1 above, CCL will pay Allin for any such support services on a time and materials basis. 
  
 (b) Commencing on the first day following the expiration of the Warranty Period and continuing through the end of the then current calendar year, CCL
shall pay to Allin on a time and materials basis at an hourly rate of $[REDACTED – CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED] for support services provided by Allin. Subject to CCL’s payment of any amounts due under this Section 9.2(b), Allin will
provide the level of support services set forth on Schedule 9.2(b). Allin shall invoice CCL at the completion of every month for the actual hours used in the month. 
  
 Prior to the end of every calendar year, the parties agree to meet and discuss in good faith the then current levels and
prices of Support Services to determine whether CCL or Allin desires that the level of Support Services be revised and the appropriate fee changes relating thereto. 
  
 In witness whereof, this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 Allin Interactive Corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/    RICHARD W. TALARICO        
	 	 	

	 Its:
	 	Chairman & CEO

  

			
	Carnival Cruise Lines, a division of Carnival Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/    MYLES CYR        
	 	 	

	 Its:
	 	VP – CIO
EXHIBIT 31.4





CERTIFICATION


I, Sanjay Patel, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Aof Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.


August 19, 2015

/s/ SANJAY S. PATELSanjay S. PatelChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 21

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that the firearms 
 prohibitions applicable by reason of a domestic violence misdemeanor 
     conviction do not apply if the conviction occurred before the 
                        prohibitions became law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Barr of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that the firearms 
 prohibitions applicable by reason of a domestic violence misdemeanor 
     conviction do not apply if the conviction occurred before the 
                        prohibitions became law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FIREARMS PROHIBITIONS APPLICABLE BY REASON OF A DOMESTIC 
              VIOLENCE MISDEMEANOR CONVICTION NOT TO APPLY TO 
              CONVICTIONS OBTAINED BEFORE THE PROHIBITIONS BECAME LAW.

    Subsections (d)(9), (g)(9), and (s)(3)(B)(i) of section 922 of 
title 18, United States Code, are each amended by inserting ``, on or 
after September 28, 1996,'' before ``of a misdemeanor''.
                                 <all>
```