alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1850 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1850

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility 
Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century and to make technical corrections 
                  to the law governing the Commission.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1850

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility 
Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century and to make technical corrections 
                  to the law governing the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Housing Commission Extension 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SENIORS HOUSING AND HEALTH FACILITY NEEDS 
              COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    Section 525 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and 
Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 
(42 U.S.C. 12701 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ``reimbursable'' and 
        inserting ``non-reimbursable'';
            (2) in the first sentence of subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking ``Banking and''; and
                    (B) by striking ``December 31, 2001'' and inserting 
                ``December 31, 2002''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking ``June 30, 2002'' and 
        inserting ``March 31, 2003''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
exv10w18



 





EXHIBIT 10.18




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TERMINATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN

MOBILEPRO CORPORATION AND ARNE DUNHEM DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2003



This Second Amendment to the Termination Agreement (defined below) between
Mobilepro Corporation and Arne Dunhem (this “Amendment”) is entered into this
8th day of April, 2004, by and between Arne Dunhem (“Dunhem”), on the one hand,
and Mobilepro Corp. (the “Company”), on the other hand. The parties hereto
represent as follows:




     WHEREAS, the Company and Dunhem are party to a termination agreement
between the Company and Dunhem dated November 26, 2003 (the “Termination
Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay a Separation Payment
based on an annual salary of $180,000, in equal installments on the 15th and
last day of each calendar month, continuing through December 31, 2004, unless
the success fee is paid to you under the terms of the Termination Agreement in
connection with the anticipated $1 million financing from Cornell Capital, in
which case Mobilepro will pay your salary in equal installments on the 15th and
last day of each calendar month, continuing through July 31, 2004, which
Separation Payment has been paid through March 31, 2004; and



     WHEREAS, the Company received $1,000,000 from Cornell Capital for which
Dunhem has been eligible to receive the Separation Payment based on an annual
salary in equal installments on the 15th and last day of each calendar month,
continuing through July 31, 2004; and



     WHEREAS Dunhem has agreed to forego the remaining installment payments
continuing through July 31, 2004 in recognition of the Company’s cash flow
constraints and other considerations and has instead agreed to reduce the
remaining Separation Payments to $30,000 to be paid by April 15, 2004 through
the normal payroll process.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and promises
contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




	 	1.	 	Dunhem waives the right to receive the remaining installment
payments continuing through July 31, 2004 and agrees to accept a
reduced Separation Payment of $30,000 to be paid by April 15, 2004
through the normal payroll process.
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect.
	 
	 	3.	 	This Amendment may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original and all of which, taken together,
shall be deemed one and the same documents.





 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and
year first set forth above.




MOBILEPRO CORP.








By: Kurt Gordon

Title: CFO



WE HAVE READ THE FOREGOING AND FULLY UNDERSTAND ITS TERMS AND ACCEPT THESE
TERMS. WE ARE SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY, HAVING BEEN GIVEN
A FULL AND FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER IT AND CONSULT WITH ADVISORS OF OUR
CHOICE.




AGREED AND ACCEPTED:








Arne Dunhem
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Michael Tyrance

Criminal No . 08-cr-104-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

15) filed by defendant is granted ; no further continuances .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : December 23, 200 8

cc : Pau l

Terry

U .S .

U .S .

Garrity,

Ollila ,

Marsha l

Probation

Esq .

Esq .

Case 1:08-cr-00104-JD Document 16 Filed 12/23/08 Page 1 of 1
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending February 6, 2021

----

Bank Branches, Domestic            Regions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama -- to establish a branch at Farm to Market Road 423 (West University Drive), Frisco, Texas.            -Approved, February 5, 2021                        Simmons Bank, Pine Bluff, Arkansas -- to establish a branch at 8319 Preston Road, Dallas, Texas.            -Approved, February 5, 2021            Forms            Forms -- initial Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping Requirements Associated with Changes in Foreign Investments (Made Pursuant to Regulation K) (FR 2064) and Interagency Guidance on Managing Compliance and Reputation Risks for Reverse Mortgage Products (FR 4029); final Board review to extend with revision the Recordkeeping and Disclosure Provisions Associated with Real Estate Appraisal Standards (FR Y-30); final Board review to extend without revision the Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Disclosure Provisions Associated with the Guidance on Response Programs for Unauthorized Access to Customer Information and Customer Notice (FR 4100) and Recordkeeping, Disclosure, and Reporting Requirements Associated with Securities Transactions Pursuant to Sections 208.34(c), (d), and (g) of Regulation H (FR H-3).            -Approved, February 5, 2021            Regulations and Policies            Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors, and Principal Shareholders of Member Banks) -- interim final rule with request for comment to extend a rule change to bolster the effectiveness of the Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program.            -Approved, February 5, 2021            Enforcement            Hua Nan Commercial Bank Limited, Taipei City, Taiwan, and Hua Nan Commercial Bank Limited New York Agency, New York, New York -- consent cease and desist order dated April 19, 2018, terminated January 27, 2021.            -Announced, February 2, 2021                        Santander Holdings USA, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, and Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Dallas, Texas -- written agreement dated March 21, 2017, terminated February 2, 2021.            -Announced, February 4, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
#### The SQUIRE’S SHOP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert H. BOEHLOW, Garnishee-Respondent, and Joanne Boehlow, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 34216.

Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District.

June 27, 1972.

Richard M. Stout, John V. LaBarge, Jr., Kirkwood, for plaintiff-appellant.

Herbert D. Schaeffer, Clayton, for defendant-respondent.

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining defendant Joanne Boehiow’s motion to quash plaintiff’s garnishment on garnishee Robert H. Boehiow. The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant Joanne Boehiow in the amount of $261.77 in the Magistrate Court of St. Louis County. Subsequently, a transcript of the judgment was filed in the St. Louis County Circuit Court. That court issued an execution against defendant Joanne Boehiow and a garnishment naming Robert H. Boehiow garnishee. Thereafter, and before the return term of the Writ issued by the Circuit Court, defendant Joanne Boehiow filed a “Motion to Quash Garnishment.” The motion alleged that the garnishee was not a personal debtor of the defendant. It further alleged that Joanne Boehiow and Robert H. Boehiow were divorced, and that under the terms of their divorce decree, defendant was merely a recipient of funds which the court required the garnishee to pay to the defendant for the support of their child, and that, therefore, the funds in question actually belong to the child. It was alleged that she received the funds only as a trustee, and for this reason, they are not subject to her personal debts, or any judgments or executions against her. The di*739vorce decree, originally issued and as modified, was attached to defendant’s motion, showing an award to her of alimony, attorney fees and child support payments.

The defendant Joanne Boehlow failed to file a brief in this court. However, we do not reach the merits of this case, since it is our conclusion that the defendant’s motion was premature and should not have been heard. The plaintiff has a statutory right to file interrogatories to the garnishee at the return term of the Writ. § 525.130 RSMo 1969 V.A.M.S. The return date of this Writ was June 22, 1971. This motion was sustained on April 15, 1971. Therefore, plaintiff was deprived of its right to inquire into the garnishee’s status as a debtor of the defendant. Since the terms of the divorce decree indicate, in addition to child support, that the garnishee is also obligated for alimony and attorney fees, it is entirely possible that the garnishee may be a personal debtor of the defendant. The plaintiff may not be deprived of its rights of discovery by a prematurely sustained motion to quash. Reversed and remanded.

SMITH and SIMEONE, JJ., concur.
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2023


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: August 8, 2023
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors of Bovie Medical Corporation





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number 333-195624 on Form S-8 of Bovie Medical Corporation, of our report dated March 31, 2014, except for Note 19 as to which the date is May 8, 2014, on the consolidated balance sheet of Bovie Medical Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K..








/s/ Kingery & Crouse, P.A.





Tampa, Florida


October 31, 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Soto, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 325]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Roger Hayes, J.), rendered March 10, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of eight years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s credibility determinations.

Counsel’s failure to request submission of the lesser included offense of attempted assault in the third degree did not constitute ineffective assistance, since the record establishes that counsel purposefully and successfully sought the dismissal of three counts of the indictment based on the absence of proof that the victim suffered a physical injury. These included the third degree assault count, under which attempted third degree assault would have been a lesser included offense. Defendant has not established that counsel’s choice was ill-advised or without a strategic justification *(see, People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709). In any event, counsel’s failure to request this charge could not have prejudiced defendant’s defense or deprived him of a fair trial *(see, People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714; *People v Hobot,*84 NY2d 1021, 1024). In view of the evidence supporting the robbery charge and the court’s instructions to the jury, there is no reason to believe that the absence of an attempted assault charge caused any prejudice.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion based on the officer’s brief characterization of what he perceived to be happening as he arrived at the scene. The court offered to provide a curative instruction but defendant insisted on the drastic remedy of a mistrial *(see, People v Young,*48 NY2d 995). Defense counsel’s subsequent *317cross-examination established that the officer had not witnessed any crime take place, and there was no reasonable possibility that the officer’s testimony contributed to the verdict. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending October 10, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodVANGUARD GROUP, INC.                                                                                                    CICNotification submitted by The Vanguard Group, Inc., Malvern, PA, on behalf of itself, its subsidiaries and affiliates (together with The Vanguard Group, Inc., "Vanguard"), and the investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, other pooled investment vehicles, and institutional accounts that are sponsored, managed, or advised by Vanguard (the "Vanguard funds"), for the Vanguard funds to increase the aggregate ownership position of the Vanguard funds to more than 15 percent of the common stock of Citizen's Financial Group, Inc., parent of Citizen's Bank, National Association, both in Providence, Rhode Island.Newspaper: 10/01/2020Federal Register: 10/02/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          48,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  791,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    953,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,093,399
<PP&E>                                       2,575,705
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,136,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,837,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,538,796
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,071
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,100,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,837,601
<SALES>                                      7,371,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,371,281
<CGS>                                        4,138,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,138,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,154,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                                     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Armando Laguer, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 725]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered June 27, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending November 5, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCLAYTON BANCORP, INC                                                                                                    4c8Clayton Bancorp, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, requests to engage in making, acquiring, brokering, or servicing loans, or other extensions of credit, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1), and to engage in activities related to extending credit, pursuant to Section 225.28(b)(2), of Regulation Y and 4(c)8 of the Bank Holding Company Act.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: 11/18/2011FIRST NBC BANK HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                          * 3A3First NBC Bank Holding Company, New Orleans, Louisiana, to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Central Progressive Bank, Lacombe, Louisiana.Newspaper: 11/28/2011Federal Register: 11/18/2011INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN                                                              * 3A3Independent Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Red Bay, Alabama, to acquire an additional 19.30 percent of the outstanding shares of Independent Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiary, Community Spirit Bank, both of Red Bay, Alabama, along with Spirit Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiary, Spirit Bank, both of Belmont, Mississippi. The acquisition will increase  Independent Bancshares, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan's ownership in Independent Bancshares, Inc., to   46.47 Percent.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/05/2011NCG BANCO, S.A.                                                                                                         FBSEANCG Banco, S.A., A Coruna, Spain, to establish an international bank branch in Miami, Florida.Newspaper: 11/26/2011Federal Register: Not applicableRAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.                                                                                           * 3A1Raymond James Financial, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Raymond James Bank, FSB, both of St. Petersburg, Florida, to be named Raymond James Bank, N.A., upon its conversion to a national bank.Newspaper: 11/18/2011Federal Register: 11/21/2011
NSA      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS


As independent oil and gas consultants, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
hereby consents to the incorporation and all references to our firm included in
or made a part of the Westside Energy Corporation Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and incorporated by reference into
the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC file no.
333-124890) filed on May 13, 2005 and the previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-1 14686) filed on April 21, 2004.

                                   NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                   By: /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                           Frederic D. Sewell
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas
May 15, 2006