alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending May 9, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITIZENS GUARANTY FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                 CICInteragency Notice of Change in Bank Control submitted by the John M. St. Clair, Jr. Trust, Irvine, KY (Kathy Dale Samples, Trustee) of its intent to retain control of 100% of the outstanding voting shares of Citizens Guaranty Financial Corporation, Irvine, KY which controls Citizens Guaranty Bank, Richmond, KY.Newspaper: 05/21/2009Federal Register: 05/14/2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,003,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                   362,896
<INVENTORY>                                  2,992,018
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,270,489
<PP&E>                                       7,278,930
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,408,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,266,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,694,242
<BONDS>                                      3,997,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,124
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,537,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,266,534
<SALES>                                      6,218,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,218,402
<CGS>                                        4,519,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,519,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,575,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,887
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (22,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,887
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 474,112 122,239 72,551 46,780 39,241 38,469 52,868 Number of loans 10,536 1,816 2,864 1,765 848 94 914 Weighted average maturity (months)1 27.99 31.97 23.92 42.09 26.44 3.30 29.58 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 15.21 12.81 13.06 21.08 15.04 2.79 28.29 

Weighted average risk rating3 2.37 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 8.36 7.66 8.82 8.78 9.01 7.52 8.38 

 Standard error5 .17 .44 .12 .22 .33 .76 .19 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.01 8.81 9.35 9.53 9.70 7.45 8.50  25th percentile 7.63 6.01 8.19 8.06 8.50 7.45 8.25  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.79 8.66 9.29 8.42 9.30 n.a. 8.24  Other livestock 8.50 10.38 n.a. 9.65 9.53 7.45 8.39  Other current operating expenses7 8.27 7.56 8.88 9.03 8.88 9.70 8.64 

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.78 7.64 8.57 8.96 9.19 n.a. 8.65  Farm real estate 7.35 7.23 7.26 7.61 7.75 n.a. 8.25  Other8 8.87 n.a. 8.61 8.90 8.84 n.a. n.a

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 34.86 31.21 33.04 47.79 61.78 3.17 14.94  Under commitment 54.81 56.40 60.41 51.15 71.87 97.30 19.65  Callable 23.26 13.17 8.99 15.39 63.19 2.70 12.35  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 21.54 11.51 1.91 6.18 65.79 n.a. 52.58  Other livestock 19.13 .58 29.60 17.77 1.96 96.83 16.78  Other current operating expenses7 43.02 75.60 52.06 40.54 12.26 3.17 23.79 

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.34 .76 6.52 12.52 3.45 n.a. 5.43  Farm real estate 10.49 11.55 6.10 21.81 15.03 n.a. 1.42  Other8 1.48 n.a. 3.81 1.18 1.52 n.a. n.a

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 22.75 18.71 6.72 32.19 18.56 n.a. 53.15  Other 73.91 77.31 90.77 67.04 n.a. n.a. n.a Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
         333-113519 on Form S-8 dated March 11, 2004, Registration Statement
         33-61977 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, Registration Statement
         33-61979 on Form S-8 dated August 21, 1995, Registration Statement
         33-12571 on Form S-8 dated March 11, 1987 and Registration Statement
         33-593 on Form S-8 dated October 1, 1985, of our report dated March 19,
         2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
         2002 and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
         equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
         period ended December 31, 2002, and the financial statement schedule
         for each of the respective periods, of Integral Vision, Inc. and
         subsidiary (formerly Medar, Inc. and subsidiaries) included in the
         Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

         /S/ Moore Stephens Doeren Mayhew

         Troy, Michigan
         March 26, 2004
#### Yost, Admr., *v.*Schmitt.

(No. 24307

— Decided March 14, 1934.)

*Mr. C. F. McConnell*and *Mr. G. C. Hafley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ewing <& Hecher,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of *Cleveland Trust Co.*v. *Scobie, Admr.,*114 Ohio St., 241.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
Label	Description
Date							monthly, last business day of month
Reverse repo program with Federal Reserve (millions)	Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of reverse repurchase agreements conducted as part of the Federal Reserve’s Overnight Reverse Repurchase Agreement Operational Exercise					millions of dollars
U.S. Treasury repo (millions)	  			Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of security repurchase agreements with U.S. Treasury securities as collateral	millions of dollars
U.S. Agency repo (millions)	  			Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of security repurchase agreements with U.S. governemnt agency and government sponsored enterprise backed securities as collateral	millions of dollars
Other repo (millions)	  				Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of security repurchase agreements with other securities as collateral	    millions of dollars
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elaine M. Parfitt, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ELAINE M. PARFITT  
|Elaine M. Parfitt      
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: December 9, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending December 30, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.                                                                                                * 3A3Franklin Resources, Inc., San Mateo, California, to retain control of 24.4 percent of First Chicago Bancorp, and thereby indirectly retain control of its subsidiary, First Chicago Bank & Trust, both of Chicago, Illinois.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availablePRINEVILLE BANCORPORATION                                                                                               CICNotice by Stuart J. Shelk, Jr., Linda S. Shelk, Clark J. Shelk Trust UA, Anne Marie Shelk Trust UA, and John B. Shelk Trust UA, Powell Butte, Oregon, to increase their ownership to 10.58 percent, collectively, in Prineville Bancorporation and thereby indirectly control its subsidiary, Community First Bank, both of Prineville, Oregon.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/03/2007
Slip Op. 01-106 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

___________________________________ : RHP BEARINGS LTD.,NSK BEARINGS : EUROPE LTD. and NSK CORPORATION; : THE BARDEN CORPORATION (U.K.) LTD.,: THE BARDEN CORPORATION, : FAG BEARINGS CORPORATION, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Consolidated : Court No. 97-11-01983 UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : ___________________________________: JUDGMENT This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, RHP Bearings Ltd. v. United States , 25 CIT ___, Slip Op. 01-18 (Feb. 23, 2001) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on May 18, 2001, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

______________________________ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE
Dated: August 20, 2001 New York, New York
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
                                December 31, 2003

The following significant subsidiaries are consolidated in the financial
statements submitted as a part of this report:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Jurisdiction of      Percentage of Voting
                                               Incorporation         Securities Owned
                                              ---------------      --------------------
<S>                                           <C>                  <C>
Controlled by Campbell Resources Inc.:
         Meston Resources Inc.                    Quebec                   100%
         MSV Resources Inc.                       Quebec                   100%
         GeoNova Explorations Inc.                Canada                   100%
         Sotula Gold Corporation Inc.             Canada                   100%

Controlled by Meston Resources Inc.
         Meston Investments Limited           Cayman Islands               100%
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2056 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2056

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing deadline 
   for certain claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2001

 Ms. Kaptur (for herself, Mr. Frost, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Gonzalez, and Mr. 
    Pitts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing deadline 
   for certain claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vaccine Injury Compensation Reform 
Act''.

SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to prevent the unfair denial of 
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to 
certain individuals who are diagnosed as having vaccine-related 
injuries more than 36 months after the first symptom, manifestation of 
onset, or signifcant aggravation of such injuries.

SEC. 3. REVISION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN CLAIMS UNDER NATIONAL 
              VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM.

    Paragraph (2) of section 2116(a) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 300aa-16(a)) is amended by striking ``no petition'' and all 
that follows in such paragraph and inserting the following: ``no 
petition may be filed for compensation under the Program for such 
injury after the expiration of 36 months after the date on which such 
injury is diagnosed, except that, if such injury is first diagnosed 
before the date of the enactment of the Vaccine Injury Compensation 
Reform Act, no petition may be filed for compensation under the Program 
for such injury after the expiration of 36 months after the latest of--
                    ``(A) the date on which such injury is diagnosed,
                    ``(B) the date of the occurrence of the first 
                symptom or manifestation of onset or of the significant 
                aggravation of such injury, or
                    ``(C) the date of the enactment of the Vaccine 
                Injury Compensation Reform Act, if such injury is first 
                diagnosed after the expiration of 36 months after the 
                date referred to in subparagraph (B), and''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7723
TYRONE DELANO GILLIAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORUGI M UNGAI, M.D.; DR. MEILLER, Psychiatrist; PAUL KNIGHT, Case Management Counselor; KEVIN KNIGHT, Psychiatrist, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-3096) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Delano Gilliam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gilliam v. Mungai , No. CA-94-3096 (D. Md. Sept. 13, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.2


                         CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP


 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements
 (Forms S-8 Nos.   333-89760,  333-69372, 33-64403,  33-64405, 33-64407,  33-
 55920, 33-50430, 33-42002, 33-36041 and 33-22849 and Forms S-3 Nos. 33-60833
 and 33-57360)  of our report dated February 28, 2003, except  for Note Seven
 as to which the  date is March 10, 2003,  with respect  to the  December 31,
 2002 consolidated financial statements and schedule and for each of the  two
 years in the period ended December 31, 2002 of Carrington Laboratories, Inc.
 and subsidiaries included in  their Annual Report (Form  10-K) for the  year
 ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

  Dallas, Texas
  February 20, 2004
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 18, 2006



/s/ CARL-HENRIC SVANBERGCarl-Henric Svanberg President and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
1

 “[#28]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

2

 This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02276-REB-KMT

RAUL TRETO,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOULDER COUNTY,

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the following: 1) the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

Amended Complaint [#28]1 filed October 3,2012; and 2) the Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge [#30] filed March 15, 2013, which addresses the

motion to dismiss. Because no objections to the recommendation have been filed, I

review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration &

Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).2 Finding no error, much

less plain error, in the magistrate judge’s recommended disposition of this case, I find

and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted as an order of

this court.

In its motion, the defendant seeks dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint under FED.

Case 1:11-cv-02276-REB-KMT Document 31 Filed 09/03/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and (6). In her recommendation, the magistrate judge examines the

allegations in the plaintiff’s amended complaint [#26] and applies properly the standards

applicable under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and (6). I agree with the conclusions of the

magistrate judge that, accepting the plaintiff’s factual allegations as true, the complaint

does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. In addition, I agree with the

magistrate judge that this court may not properly exercise jurisdiction over any state law

claim the plaintiff intends to assert. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

[#30] filed March 15, 2013, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [#28] filed

October 3,2012, is GRANTED;

3. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) and (6), the plaintiff’s amended complaint

[#26] is DISMISSED without prejudice;

4. That JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendant, Boulder County,

and against the plaintiff, Raul Treto;

5. That defendant is AWARDED its costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court in

the time and manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1;

and

6. That this case is CLOSED.

Dated September 3, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02276-REB-KMT Document 31 Filed 09/03/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward G.Caminos, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to andsolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledgeand belief, that:

 

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/  Edward G. Caminos* |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward G. Caminos        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |
| November 9, 2010    |   |

 

 

----