alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
26 January 2000


The Directors of FHP Holdings Ltd
First Floor
Euro Canadian Centre
Marlborough Street
Nassau
Bahamas



Dear Sirs

We refer to the agreement  between us dated 7 August 1998 and to our  subsequent
discussions concerning fees payable.

We now write to confirm the agreement reached between us concerning fees. Clause
5(1) of the Management  Services  Agreement  dated 7 August 1998 is amended with
effect from 1 October 1998 as follows:-

"The Company shall pay a fee to the consultant  which shall be equivalent to the
sum of:

(a)      the basic annual salary and any bonus paid to the Managing Director of
         Huntingdon Life Sciences Group plc; and

(b)      the  benefits  provided to the  Managing  Director of  Huntingdon  Life
         Sciences Group plc excluding his disturbance  allowed PROVIDED THAT the
         amount payable pursuant to this sub-clause (b) shall be no greater than
         (pound)100,000 per annum

         (plus  VAT if  appropriate)  ("Fee").  The  Fee  shall  be  paid to the
         Consultant upon production of a valid invoice in accordance with clause
         5(2) below".

All other terms of the Management Services Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please confirm your agreement to the above amendment to the Management  Services
Agreement by signing and returning to me the attached duplicate of this letter.

Yours faithfully


Brian Cass
Managing Director



I hereby confirm the agreement on behalf of FHP Holdings Ltd to the above change
to the Management Services Agreement dated 7 August 1998.



Signed:..............................................

For and on behalf of FHP Holdings Ltd




Date:  ...............................................
H. R. 1696

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To expedite the construction of the World War II memorial in the District of

Columbia.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL SITE AND

DESIGN.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the World War

II memorial described in plans approved by the Commission of

Fine Arts on July 20, 2000 and November 16, 2000, and selected

by the National Capital Planning Commission on September 21,

2000 and December 14, 2000, and in accordance with the special

use permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior on January

23, 2001, and numbered NCR–NACC–5700–0103, shall be constructed expeditiously at the dedicated Rainbow Pool site in the

District of Columbia in a manner consistent with such plans and

permits, subject to design modifications, if any, approved in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

Elements of the memorial design and construction not approved

as of the date of enactment of this Act shall be considered and

approved in accordance with the requirements of the Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).

SEC. 3. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

The decision to locate the memorial at the Rainbow Pool site

in the District of Columbia and the actions by the Commission

of Fine Arts on July 20, 2000 and November 16, 2000, the actions

by the National Capital Planning Commission on September 21,
H. R. 1696—2

2000 and December 14, 2000, and the issuance of the special use

permit identified in section 1 shall not be subject to judicial review.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         113,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,089,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                   170,250
<INVENTORY>                                  5,518,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,194,345
<PP&E>                                       5,526,038
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,401,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,533,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,766,459
<BONDS>                                      3,183,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,546,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,533,486
<SALES>                                      4,721,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,721,576
<CGS>                                        3,487,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,487,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,472,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (310,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (310,624)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (162,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### Birns *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24913

— Decided September 26, 1934.)

*Mr. Herman H. Hinkle*and *Mr. Henry Galen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank T. Gullitan,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause. I

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Jones, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
(July 3, 2002)

#### In the Matter of Robert R. Race, an Attorney.

[748 NYS2d 128]

Effective date of respondent’s suspension modified to July 5, 2002. No opinion. Concur — Williams, P.J., Buckley, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
**Exhibit —    23** **Consent    of Experts and Counsel****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements:     Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-142428)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Director Deferred Compensation    Plan,     Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-116414)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan,     Registration Statements    (Form S-8    Nos.    333-115948    and    333-115949)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Retirement Savings Plan,     Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 33-56403)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan,     Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-69194)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1997 Long-term Incentive    Plan, and     Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-74426)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Plan for the Deferral of    Directors’ Compensation;     of our reports dated March 24, 2008, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements and schedule of Milacron Inc.,    and the effectiveness of internal control over financial    reporting of Milacron Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Cincinnati, Ohio    March 24, 2008
| Skip to Content	Release dates |    AboutCurrent 	release  	*Other formats:*ASCII (43 KB) |    PDF (200 KB) |    CSV (161 KB)Release Dates

On October 1, 2010, the E.15 statistical release transitioned from the Board of Governors to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. You can now find the most current Agricultural Finance Databook at    https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/indicatorsdata/agfinancedatabook.
These data are derived from quarterly sample surveys conducted by the Federal Reserve System during the first full week of the second month of each quarter. The data are generally released at month-end in March, June, September, and December.
Releases2010  |  2009  |  2008  |  2007  |  2006  |  2005  |  2004  |  2003  |  2002
Statistical releasesHome |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: November 18, 2010** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending October 22, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADAM BANK GROUP, INC.                                                                                                   * 3A3Adam Bank Group, Inc., Tampa, Florida, to acquire 100 percent of Brazos Valley Bank, National Association, College Station, Texas, through the merger of its banking subsidiary, American Momentum Bank, Tampa, Florida, with and into Brazos Valley Bank, National Association, with American Momentum Bank surviving this merger.Newspaper: 10/25/2011Federal Register: 10/27/2011HAPPY BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                  * 3A1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 862 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 12, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4299) to extend the Terrorism Insurance 
Program of the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 4299 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1 “[#66]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02286-REB-CBS

CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL CENTER, LTD., LLP,

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,

v.

GAROLD B. KRAFT, d/b/a EXOTIC MOTORS,

Defendant/Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

RANDOLPH G. CURRIER,

Counterclaim Defendant,

VAL SIMONE, and

GOLDEN APPRAISAL SERVICES, LLC,

Third-Party Defendants.

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT

GOLDEN APPRAISAL SERVICES, LLC, ONLY

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Notice of Dismissal of Third-Party Defendant

Golden Appraisal Services, LLC [#66]1 filed July 24, 2012. After reviewing the notice

and the record, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that the claims of the

third-party plaintiff, Garold B. Kraft, d/b/a Exotic Motors, against third-party defendant

Golden Appraisal Services, LLC should be dismissed.

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 68 Filed 07/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Notice of Dismissal of Third-Party Defendant Golden Appraisal

Services, LLC [#66] filed July 24, 2012, is APPROVED;

2. That the claims of the third-party plaintiff Garold B. Kraft d/b/a Exotic Motors

against third-party defendant Golden Appraisal Services LLC are DISMISSED; and

3. That third-party defendant Golden Appraisal Services LLC is DROPPED as a

named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.

Dated July 25, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 68 Filed 07/25/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending June 1, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOMPASS BANK                                                                                                            PWICompass Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, request for approval to make three public welfare investments.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableHANCOCK WHITNEY CORPORATION                                                                                             * 3A5
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending August 11, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCAPSTAR FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                                        * 3A5
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

August 27, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00185

- CR

Adelid a TREVINO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas Trial Court No. 18

- 203

- CR Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due June 28, 2021. In response to this court’s notification that the record was late, the court reporter requested an extension of time to file the record until August 23, 2021, and we granted that request. On August 26, 2021, the court reporter requested an additional extension of time until S eptember 7, 2021, for a total extension of 70 days. After consideration, we GRANT the court reporter’s request and ORDER her to file the reporter’s record by September 7, 2021

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of August, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-49-PB

Michael L. Cecchetti

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for January 6, 2009 to allow additional time to

complete plea negotiations. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 6, 2009 to February 3, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00049-PB Document 15 Filed 12/18/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 22, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued

to January 20, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 18, 2008

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Clyde Garrigan, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00049-PB Document 15 Filed 12/18/08 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R.R.H., M.D.J., and M.K., Children

Appellate case number: 01-14-00874-CV

Trial court case number: 74587

Trial court: 300th District Court of Brazoria County

This case involves an appeal from the trial court’s October 17, 2014 order 

terminating the rights of appellant, Destinye Kelley, to her minor children, R.R.H., 

M.D.J., and M.K. Appellant filed her notice of appeal on October 28, 2014. The record 

was therefore due on November 7, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(b). The clerk’s record 

was filed on November 7, 2014. The reporter’s record has not been filed.

On November 24, 2014, the court reporter notified this Court that appellant had 

not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. On February 3, 2015, we ordered 

appellant to provide, within 30 days of our order, proof that she had requested and paid or 

made arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s record, and we notified her 

that if she failed to provide such proof we may consider and decide only those issues or 

points that do not require a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

Appellant has not provided the Court with evidence showing that she has paid or 

made arrangements to pay the court reporter. Accordingly, the Court will consider and 

decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 20 days of the date of this order. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 20 

days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

Judge’s signature: /s./ Sherry Radack

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 27, 2015
|   | 1. | Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly      Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BY:    | /s/ John Lackland                  |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | John      Lackland                 |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|   | (principal      financial officer) |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Resources, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ManuelPablo Zuniga-Pflucker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker* | * * |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Manuel Pablo  Zúñiga-Pflücker      |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer            |
| May 9, 2008                                  |

 

----
1

The Parties’ request to vacate the Scheduling Conference and schedule a Settlement

Conference is denied as moot in light of the Court’s November 22, 2011 minute order [docket #16].

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02237-PAB-MEH

FRANK J. LAGUARDIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LARRY H. MILLER CORPORATION – ENGLEWOOD, d/b/a Larry H. Miller Nissan,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 25, 2011.

The Parties’ Joint Motion to Modify Deadlines and Schedule Settlement Conference [filed

November 22, 2011; docket #15] is granted in part and denied in part.

1

 Defendant shall file an

answer or other responsive pleading on or before December 19, 2011. 

Case 1:11-cv-02237-PAB-MEH Document 21 Filed 11/25/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
DEFENDANT: Alois Craig Weingart

YEAR OF BIRTH: 1953

ADDRESS: Denver, Colorado

COMPLAINT FILED? YES X NO 

IF YES, PROVIDE MAGISTRATE CASE NUMBER: 

HAS DEFENDANT BEEN ARRESTED ON COMPLAINT? YES X NO

IF NO, A NEW WARRANT IS REQUIRED

OFFENSE: Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9: Wire Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343

Count 17: Engaging in Monetary Transactions in Property Derived from Specified

Unlawful Activity, 18 U.S.C. § 1957

LOCATION OF OFFENSE: Denver, Boulder, and Douglas Counties, Colorado

PENALTY: Counts 1, 2, 7, 8, 9(Each Count): NMT 20 years’ imprisonment and/or NMT

$250,000 fine; $100.00 Special Assessment Fee.

Count 17: NMT 10 years’ imprisonment and/or NMT $250,000 fine; $100.00 

Special Assessment Fee.

AGENT: Special Agent Scott Doner, F.B.I.

AUTHORIZED BY: Linda Kaufman

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ESTIMATED TIME OF TRIAL:

 five days or less X over five days other

THE GOVERNMENT

 X will seek detention in this case will not seek detention in this case

The statutory presumption of detention is not applicable to this defendant.

OCDETF CASE: Yes X No

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 1-3 filed 08/31/11 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1