alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,337,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,474,756
<PP&E>                                         354,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,560,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,545
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,725
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,312,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,560,823
<SALES>                                         71,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          298,622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,525,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,622,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,622,808)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,622,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1994: Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Q4... 92.3 44.5 47.7 .8 1.5 .2 7.1 9.6 4.9

2005: Q1... 89.3 45.0 44.3 -3.2 1.1 -7.2 5.9 8.7 3.3

 Q2... 93.5 46.2 47.3 4.7 2.7 6.6 5.1 7.7 2.7

 Q3... 96.7 47.1 49.5 3.4 2.0 4.8 5.7 7.4 4.0

 Q4... 97.5 47.6 49.9 .9 1.0 .8 5.7 6.9 4.6

2006: Q1... 96.2 48.4 47.7 -1.4 1.8 -4.4 7.7 7.6 7.7

 Q2... 101.0 49.8 51.2 5.1 2.9 7.2 8.1 7.8 8.3

 Q3... 104.2 51.1 53.0 3.1 2.5 3.6 7.8 8.4 7.1

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 9Federal Reserve Bank of: MinneapolisFilings received during the week ending September 9, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBLACKRIDGE FINANCIAL, INC.                                                                                              * 3A3BlackRidge Financial, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of Carlos Bancshares, Inc., Alexandria, Minnesota and thereby indirectly acquire First State Bank of Alexandria, Alexandria, Minnesota.Newspaper: 09/21/2006Federal Register: 09/25/2006COMMUNITY RESOURCE BANK                                                                                                 MemberCommunity Resource Bank, Northfield, Minnesota, proposes to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableMINNWEST CORPORATION                                                                                                    * 3A3Minnwest Corporation, Minnetonka, Minnesota, to acquire 100% percent of Aumanchester, Inc., Rochester, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire Rochester Bank, Rochester, Minnesota.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/05/2006
#### In the Matter of Saleem A. Hamid, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[810 NYS2d 229]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After observing petitioner play his radio in his cell in a loud manner, a correction officer directed him to surrender it. Petitioner refused, became argumentative and shouted obscenities at the officer. Petitioner then threw the radio at the officer, striking her in the face and left hand. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with interfering with an employee, assaulting staff, creating a disturbance and harassment. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination of guilt was affirmed on administrative appeal, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.*

Although petitioner objects to the adequacy of his employee assistant because the assistant failed to provide him with a copy of the unusual incident report, the assistant cannot be faulted for failing to provide documentation that was not available at the time of the request *(see Matter of Antinuche v Goord,*16 AD3d 743, 744 [2005]). In any event, inasmuch as petitioner was provided with a copy of the report at the hearing, any prejudice was alleviated *(see Matter of Odome v Goord,*14 AD3d 975, 976 [2005]). Petitioner did not bring to the hearing offi*1042cer’s attention any other alleged deficiencies of his assistant. While he also asserts that the hearing officer was biased, the record does not establish that the determination of guilt flowed from any alleged bias *(see Matter of Cayenne v Goord,*16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 Although it appears that a question of substantial evidence was not raised in the petition and therefore the proceeding should not have been transferred to this Court, we nevertheless retain jurisdiction in the interest of judicial economy (see *Matter of Otero v Goord,*17 AD3d 805, 806 n [2005]).
EXHIBIT 21          




                         SUBSIDIARIES OF CALTON, INC.


Calton Homes, Inc.                        Calcap XV, Inc.
Calcap Commercial Management, Inc.        Calcap XXXI, Inc.
Calton Homes of Florida, Inc. (1)         Calcap XXXII, Inc.
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc. (2)    Calcap XXXIII, Inc.
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania at           Calcap XXXIV, Inc.
 Pennway, Inc. (2)                        Calcap 36, Inc.
Calton Homes of California, Inc. (3)      Calcap 42, Inc.
Calton California Equity Corp. (3)        Calcap 46, Inc.
Calton Manzanita Corp. (3)                Calcap 48, Inc.
Calton Tamarack Corp. (3)                 Calton General, Inc.
Calton Lindenwood Corp. (3)               Calton Funding, Inc.
Calton Homes Finance, Inc.                Talcon Assignment, Inc.
Calton Homes Finance II, Inc.             Calton Homes of Chicago, Inc. (4)
Calton Capital, Inc.                      Haddon Group of Virginia, Inc.
Calton Capital II, Inc.                   Wagner Joint Venture
Calcap X, Inc.                            Pennway Joint Venture


All subsidiaries are incorporated or organized under the laws of the State of
New Jersey, except those marked with a (1), (2), (3) and (4), which are
incorporated under the laws of Florida, Pennsylvania, California and Illinois,
respectively.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH

DWAYNE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO,

DAVE WELCHER,

ERWIN MOZER, M.D., and

NURSE JANE DOE, individually,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 2, 2011.

Before the Court is a letter from Plaintiff dated November 29, 2011 [filed December 1, 2011;

docket #11]. The Court construes Plaintiff’s letter as a Motion to Clarify. 

It is inappropriate for the Court to provide legal advice to any party, pro se or otherwise.

However, the Court notes that the Certificate of Service and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint were

not mailed to Defendants until November 28, 2011. (Docket #9.) In light of this fact, the Court

directs Plaintiff to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3). 

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 16 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02284-RPM Document 23 Filed 03/06/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-223-01-SM

Jerry A. Shanahan

O R D E R

Defendant Shanahan’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 66). Trial has been rescheduled for the March 

2009 trial period. Defendant Shanahan has filed a waiver of speedy trial. Trial

is rescheduled to the March 2009 trial period.

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 6, 2009 at 11:00 a.m.

Jury Selection: March 17, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

Case 1:07-cr-00223-SM Document 68 Filed 09/11/08 Page 1 of 2
2

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

September 11, 2008 

cc: Andrew Good, Esq.

Philip Cormier, Esq.

Peter Anderson, Esq.

William Morse, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00223-SM Document 68 Filed 09/11/08 Page 2 of 2
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2006   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2007   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2008   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 2  | 3     |
| 2009   | 2  | 3  | 2  | 2  | 9     |
| 2010   | 3  | .  | .  | .  | .     |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio E. Aristud, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[744 NYS2d 753]

Appeal from a judgment of Steuben County Court (Purple, Jr., J.), entered April 24, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Aristud*(296 AD2d 844). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Burns, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-002238-PAB-KLM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND ASAY and

DENNIS GLENN COEN,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Motion for Entry of Stipulated Voluntary

Dismissal With Prejudice of Complaint Against Defendant Leland Asay [Docket No.

136]. It is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion for Entry of Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of

Complaint Against Defendant Leland Asay [Docket No. 136] filed by plaintiff The Board

of County Commissioners of the County of Adams is GRANTED. 

2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Asay as set forth in its complaint are

dismissed with prejudice.

3. Defendant Asay shall voluntarily appear at depositions, hearings, and trial

in the above-captioned case. Specifically, defendant Asay shall:

a. accept service by mail or electronic transmission of notices or

subpoenas issued by plaintiff for testimony at depositions,

hearings, or trials;

b. with respect to such notices and subpoenas, waive the territorial

limits on service contained in Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 137 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Procedure and any applicable local rules, provided plaintiff

reimburses defendant Asay for travel and lodging at a reasonable

rate; and

c. consent to personal jurisdiction in any United States District Court

for purposes of enforcing any such subpoena.

4. Plaintiff’s dismissal with prejudice against defendant Asay shall not affect

plaintiff’s claims in its complaint against the remaining defendant.

DATED July 29, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 137 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit32.2**

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   August 14, 2007 |                                          | /s/ R. Anthony Nelson    |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                         |                                          | R. Anthony  Nelson,      |
|                         |                                          | Chief Financial  Officer |
|                         | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q3... 52 41 7 20 59 21 47 4

 Q4... 35 27 38 17 54 29 34 42007: Q1... 21 29 50 11 50 38 19 4 Q2... 10 39 51 4 55 41 7 5 Q3... 2 32 66 2 50 48 5 4 Q4... 2 12 86 2 28 71 2 22008: Q1... 0 10 90 0 32 68 1 1 Q2... 6 17 77 6 27 67 6 2 Q3... 10 30 60 7 37 57 11 3

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q3... 42 48 10 15 54 31 31 5

 Q4... 25 43 32 8 62 29 18 62007: Q1... 18 38 44 5 59 36 14 5 Q2... 13 49 39 7 55 38 12 5 Q3... 6 38 56 5 52 44 8 5 Q4... 7 25 68 5 47 48 7 32008: Q1... 7 25 68 5 36 59 7 3 Q2... 8 35 57 8 40 51 12 4 Q3... 10 35 55 6 42 52 13 4

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2006: Q3... 23 55 23 5 86 9 23 5

 Q4... 22 44 33 11 72 17 17 62007: Q1... 20 30 50 0 75 25 5 5 Q2... 10 15 75 5 70 25 10 4 Q3... 5 11 84 5 53 42 5 2 Q4... 5 0 95 11 42 47 11 22008: Q1... 5 29 67 10 43 48 14 2 Q2... 10 19 71 19 29 52 14 3 Q3... 16 37 47 22 39 39 16 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Date: October 20, 2006

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

___________________________________________________________________________

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY, Gregg Anderson

a Delaware Corporation, David Palmer

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC., an Illinois Limited Liability Company, Donald Trinen

Roman Pizarro

Defendant,

v.

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION, David Palmer

Additional Party on Counterclaim.

___________________________________________________________________________

COURTROOM MINUTES

___________________________________________________________________________

Hearing on Motions

3:56 p.m. Court in session.

Court’s preliminary remarks.

Discussion among counsel and Court.

Mr. Trinen states defendant Moychem withdraws its motion [140].

ORDERED: Defendant Molychem, LLC’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment, filed

April 24, 2006 [140], is withdrawn.

ORDERED: Climax Molybdenum Company’s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Its Second

Amended Complaint Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) and Certification of

Compliance with D.C.Colo.L.Civ.R. 7.1(A), filed October 3, 2006 [154] is now

considered a motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted upon submission

and approval of a proposed order.

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 164 Filed 10/20/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

October 20, 2006

02-cv-00311-RPM

ORDERED: Defendant / Counterclaimant Molychem, LLC’s Motion for Order Pursuant

to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(c) Treating Answers-Pled Defenses as Counterclaims,

filed October 10, 2006 [157], is granted.

Discussion between Mr. Palmer, Mr. Trinen on plaintiff’s motion to compel [144].

ORDERED: Mr. Trinen has ten days to submit a supplemental report on claims of

damages.

Mr. Palmer states plaintiff withdraws its motion to compel [144].

ORDERED: Climax Molybdenum Company’s Motion to Compel Complete Responses to

Climax Corporation’s and Phelps Dodge Corporation’s Second Set of

Requests for Production of Documents to Molychem Under Fed.R.Civ.P.

37(a)(2)(B) and 37(a)(3) and Certification of Communication in Good Faith,

filed September 7, 2006 [144], is withdrawn.

ORDERED: Expert opinion reports may be supplemented if necessary.

4:30 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 34 min.

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 164 Filed 10/20/06 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of HomeLife, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005 with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Cimerman,
the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                           /s/ Andrew Cimerman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Andrew Cimerman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 17, 2005

<PAGE>

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of HomeLife, Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marie M. May, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                             /s/ Marie M. May
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Marie M. May
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Date:  October 17, 2005