alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Back to 10-QSB

EXHIBIT 32.1

 

I, Richard Koch, Chief Executive    Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|                  | 1.     | the Quarterly          Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,          2003 (the “Report”)          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                  | 2.     | the information contained in the Report          fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition        and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                               |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Date: August 14, 2003 |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|                  |   | BY:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | /s/ Richard Koch |
|                  |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | Richard KochChief    Executive Officer |

The foregoing certification is being    furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document

----
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Historical Data
  About
  Announcements
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 9 Gross Value of Final Products and Nonindustrial Supplies  Item
2005
2011
2011Q4
2012
2012Q1[r]
Q2[p]
Jan.[r]
Feb.[r]
Mar.[r]
Apr.[r]
May[r]
June[p]Final products and nonindustrialsupplies
3,332.3
3,218.3
3,276.1
3,312.0
3,336.4
3,296.4
3,332.6
3,306.9
3,331.5
3,330.6
3,347.1Final products
2,474.8
2,468.3
2,519.0
2,545.1
2,564.4
2,532.7
2,559.9
2,542.6
2,559.2
2,560.4
2,573.7Consumer goods
1,834.1
1,777.6
1,805.5
1,806.5
1,810.3
1,802.8
1,817.8
1,798.9
1,805.7
1,810.2
1,815.1Durable
495.3
433.1
454.1
476.8
483.8
475.3
477.8
477.2
486.8
480.0
484.7Automotive products
288.4
277.5
297.7
317.4
322.6
316.5
317.6
318.2
326.2
318.5
323.1Other durable goods
206.9
156.1
156.9
160.1
162.0
159.5
160.9
159.8
161.4
162.2
162.3Nondurable
1,338.8
1,339.8
1,349.1
1,331.5
1,329.5
1,329.2
1,341.5
1,323.9
1,322.6
1,332.5
1,333.3Equipment, total
640.8
692.6
717.0
745.2
762.4
735.7
748.6
751.3
762.0
758.0
767.3Business and defense
617.4
670.7
693.1
721.3
739.4
711.5
724.8
727.6
738.9
734.9
744.2Business
537.5
566.6
587.2
613.6
633.8
605.7
616.1
619.0
630.8
630.2
640.5Defense and space
79.9
102.9
104.8
106.8
105.2
105.0
107.7
107.7
107.4
104.4
103.7Nonindustrial supplies
857.4
753.1
760.5
770.3
775.4
767.0
776.1
767.8
775.7
773.7
776.9Construction supplies
270.0
212.6
218.4
226.5
225.6
223.9
229.1
226.5
228.6
224.4
223.8Business supplies
587.4
540.6
542.2
543.9
550.0
543.2
547.2
541.4
547.3
549.4
553.2Commercial energy products
210.9
212.3
210.7
207.7
212.9
206.8
210.4
205.9
210.2
214.0
214.4     Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2006...... 49.71 65.53 59.36 32.84 74.12 138.48 4.90 14.96 46.68 340.26 2007...... 48.27 64.93 50.33 36.27 47.41 117.22 5.35 15.11 46.62 302.38 2008...... 58.61 76.08 70.62 44.10 45.70 136.09 5.49 15.03 46.79 335.20 2005: Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45 2006: Q1... 43.76 45.56 49.62 37.78 39.28 96.24 3.81 15.09 47.28 288.50  Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Q3... 51.48 81.93 89.64 26.57 50.49 172.18 5.41 15.01 45.16 377.96  Q4... 53.61 80.54 57.82 33.44 71.05 155.58 5.56 14.96 48.79 341.00 2007: Q1... 58.33 76.05 54.29 50.88 32.69 120.07 5.34 15.10 47.15 296.76  Q2... 39.55 48.25 33.93 32.08 41.55 95.17 5.40 15.11 45.96 276.68  Q3... 42.93 42.18 63.99 28.28 62.22 108.75 5.26 15.19 45.88 296.12  Q4... 54.29 84.90 53.85 36.07 53.00 145.08 5.39 15.03 47.47 335.44 2008: Q1... 66.99 70.42 57.84 57.17 37.17 152.28 5.63 15.42 46.38 339.22  Q2... 53.03 64.25 58.32 39.04 59.60 127.92 5.40 14.76 46.37 310.75  Q3... 56.57 97.26 91.69 40.35 42.95 136.38 5.42 14.53 46.29 368.80  Q4... 58.67 82.63 77.87 41.38 39.40 131.00 5.55 15.40 47.93 328.69 2009: Q1... 73.87 67.25 59.90 72.04 50.22 112.97 5.38 14.98 48.10 384.54  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-1 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-1 Filed 03/13/08 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-1 Filed 03/13/08 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-1 Filed 03/13/08 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB Document 1-1 Filed 03/13/08 Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

KPMG

KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Suite 3300 Commerce Court West                          Telephone (416) 777-8500
PO Box 31 Stn Commerce Court                            Telefax (416) 777-8818
Toronto ON M5L 1B2                                      www.kpmg.ca



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
USA


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Campbell Resources Inc. (the "Corporation") for the year ended December 31,
1999 of our report dated February 25, 2000 which appears under Item 14 of the
aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (registration Nos. 33-28296 and 333-93063)
pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan and Directors' Stock
Option Plan.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants
March 30, 2000

Toronto, Canada
#### The State, ex rel. Poduey, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio. 

(No. 24439

—Decided April 25, 1934.)

*Mr. 1. H. Ruth,*for relator.

*Mr. John, W. Bricher,*attorney general, and *Mr. R. R. Zurmehly,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard upon the amended petition of the relator and the motion by the respondent to strike the amended petition from the files, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this court that said motion be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that the amended petition presents no question not heretofore decided in this case.

*Amended petition stricken from files.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 8 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 4, 2007.
    Resolved,  That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Goodlatte.
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Young of Florida, 
Mr. Regula, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Walsh of New York, Mr. Hobson, 
Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. 
Wamp, Mr. Latham, Mr. Aderholt, Mrs. Emerson, Ms. Granger, Mr. Peterson of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Goode, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. 
Simpson, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Carter, and Mr. 
Alexander.
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Hunter.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin.
    Committee on Education and Labor: Mr. McKeon.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Barton of Texas.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Bachus.
    Committee on Foreign Affairs: Ms. Ros-Lehtinen.
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. King of New York.
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
California, and Mr. McCarthy of California.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Smith of Texas.
    Committee on Natural Resources: Mr. Young of Alaska.
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia.
    Committee on Rules: Mr. Dreier, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. 
Hastings of Washington, and Mr. Sessions.
    Committee on Science and Technology: Mr. Hall of Texas.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Chabot.
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Hastings of Washington.
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Mica.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Buyer
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. McCrery, Mr. Herger, Mr. Camp of Michigan, 
Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Weller 
of Illinois, Mr. Hulshof, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. 
Reynolds, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Linder, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Tiberi, 
and Mr. Porter.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00062

- CR

EX PARTE NIYAH LAVON NE WILLIAMS

From the 443rd District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 011 HC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Niyah La v onne Williams appeals the denial of her application for writ of habeas

corpus seeking a pretrial bail reduction. Williams has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal

stating that the appeal is now moot. The motion is signed by both Williams and her

attorney.

William s ’s motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 20 , 2019

Do not publish

[CR25]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Corey Henry, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wilmington Trust, National
Association.



| | By:    | /s/ Corey Henry                                                                          | 
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  | Corey Henry                                                                             
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor
| |        | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)                           
| | Date:  | March 30, 2020
#### Ellyn Grammatico, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Store Wide Delivery Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d 437]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Ellyn Grammatico appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated September 5, 2001, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Store Wide Delivery Co., Inc., Rollins Leasing Co., and James Pisano, the defendants Albert Babajanian and Lida Babajanian, and the defendants Lisa D. Cohen and Ford Motor Credit Co., which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by her and against those defendants on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and denied her motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants Store Wide Delivery Co., Inc., Rollins Leasing Co., James Pisano, Albert Babajanian, Lida Babajanian, Lisa D. Cohen, and Ford Motor Credit Co., met their initial burden of establishing, prima facie, their entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Ellyn Grammatico (hereinafter Grammatico) and against those defendants on the ground that Grammatico did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955). Their proof established, inter alia, that Grammatico did not suffer a “significant limitation” or a “permanent consequential limitation” of use of her neck or back as a result of either of the two accidents. In opposition, Grammatico failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury as a result of the accidents. The affirmation of her treating orthopedist was based upon initial examinations conducted within four months of the second accident which failed to quantify the alleged range of motion restrictions in her neck or back *(see Mejia v Thom,*280 AD2d 528; *Herman v Church,*276 AD2d 471; *Reynolds v Cleary,*274 AD2d 509). Furthermore, the orthopedist failed to explain the more than five-year gap between his initial examinations and his most recent examination, and failed to set forth the treatment, if any, that Grammatico received for her alleged injuries during that period of time *(see Mejia v Thom,*supra;*Reynolds v Cleary, supra; Cabri v Park,*260 AD2d 525; *Bandoian v Bernstein,*254 AD2d 205). Florio, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02228-RPM-MEH 

ORIE THOMPSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, LLC, a Kansas limited liability company, 

 Defendant. 

 

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 

 THE COURT having reviewed the Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant 

to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and being fully advised in the premises, DOES HEREBY 

ORDER that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, with each party to pay his or its own 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 BY THE COURT: 

October 5th, 2011 s/Richard P. Matsch 

__________________ ____________________________________ 

DATE Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02228-RPM-MEH Document 6 Filed 10/05/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-113-PB

Shane Sylvester

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the 

trial scheduled for March 3, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to complete discovery and engage in plea negotiations. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from March 3, 2009 to May 5, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00113-PB Document 14 Filed 02/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 19, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 23, 2009 at 4:15 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 14, 2009

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00113-PB Document 14 Filed 02/18/09 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Stewartson, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 725]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), rendered April 10, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon *630a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Starkey, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find unpersuasive the defendant’s argument that the lineup was unduly suggestive. An examination of the lineup photograph leads us to agree with the hearing court’s determination that the photograph does not reveal any significant differences in the appearances of the individuals that would cause the defendant to stand out from the others (see *People v Lundquist,*151 AD2d 505, 506 [1989]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s *Sandoval*ruling (see *People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371, 374-375 [1974]) was a provident exercise of its discretion. The Supreme Court struck an appropriate balance between the probative value of allowing inquiry about certain of the defendant’s prior convictions and “bad acts,” and his use of aliases, against the potential prejudice to the defendant *(People v Sobers,*272 AD2d 418 [2000]; *see People v Springer,*13 AD3d 657, 658 [2004]; *People v Taylor,*253 AD2d 471 [1998]; *People v Turner,*239 AD2d 447 [1997]).

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Further, the defendant’s contentions of prosecutorial misconduct during summation are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]), without merit, or constituted harmless error in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly imposed consecutive sentences for his two convictions of robbery in the first degree is without merit, as the subject robberies were predicated upon distinct acts committed against separate victims *(see People v Truesdell,*70 NY2d 809 [1987]; *People v Dieppa,*285 AD2d 558 [2001]; *People v Rosa,*249 AD2d 334 [1998]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved *631for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.