alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Release Date: June 30, 2010*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 6.9     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.6     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.8                    | 6.5                                |
| 6.2     | 6.4                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.0     | 6.1                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.0     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.1     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
| 5.9     | 6.1                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.0     | 6.1                    | 5.8                                |
||
| 7.4     | 7.2                    | 6.7                                |
| 7.1     | 6.9                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.5                                |
| 6.7     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.5     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.6     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.6     | 6.6                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.6     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.5     | 6.4                    | 6.2                                |
||
| 7.5     | 7.6                    | 7.7                                |
| 6.6     | 6.8                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 7.3                    | 7.1                                |
| 5.5     | 5.9                    | 5.8                                |
| 5.7     | 6.1                    | 6.0                                |
| 5.9     | 6.5                    | 6.5                                |
| 5.9     | 6.5                    | 6.6                                |
| 5.9     | 6.3                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.0     | 6.3                    | 6.2                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
#### In the Matter of Lia Carson, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 659]

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority, after a hearing, dismissing petitioner from her position as a caretaker upon a finding that she improperly used and/or possessed marijuana while at work, in violation of respondent’s Personnel Rules and Regulations, chapter I, rule XII, section B (1) (b), unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Bart Stone, J.], entered May 9, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

The finding of marijuana use and/or possession is supported by substantial evidence, namely, the testimony of the arresting officer that he smelled marijuana in the stairwell just before *463seeing petitioner, saw a marijuana cigarette being passed to petitioner, saw petitioner throw the marijuana cigarette to the ground and cover it with her foot, immediately recovered the marijuana cigarette from the floor when petitioner moved her foot, and that a bag of marijuana was recovered from petitioner’s person. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer’s findings of credibility *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). Although the officer was unable to identify petitioner at the hearing, petitioner never denied that she was the woman arrested by the officer. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness *(see Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001]). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HOSEA BOYD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 16 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff and 

Counterclaim Defendant, 

v. 

ZIPHER LTD. and 

VIDEOJET TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs. 

Civil Action No. 1 :07-cv-00006-PB 

(Consolidated Action) 

Judge: Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro 

PROPOSED ORDER 

On this day came to be considered the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss All Remaining 

Claims Without Prejudice. 

After considering the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. 

Accordingly, in order to put the case in condition for appeal, the following remaining claims are 

dismissed without prejudice: 

• Markem's claim ofnoninfringement regarding the '572 patent (No. 1:07-

cv-6-PB, Dkt. No. 39 (Markem's Amended Complaint)); 

• Markem's claims ofnoninfringement regarding the '094, '268, '917, and 

'605 patents (No. 1:10-cv-112-PB, Dkt. No. 33 (Markem's Third 

Amended Complaint)); and 

• Markem's claims ofunenforceability regarding the '094, '268, '917, and 

'605 patents (No. 1 :10-cv-112-PB, Dkt. No. 33 (Markem's Third 

Amended Complaint)). 

Case 1:07-cv-00006-PB Document 172 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 2
The clerk is directed to enter a new final judgment on all claims and close the case. 

SO ORDERED. 

September 21, 2012 lsi Paul Barhadara I I 

Paul Barbadoro 

United States District Judge 

cc: Counsel of Record 

2 

Case 1:07-cv-00006-PB Document 172 Filed 09/21/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23    

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, No. 333-41077, No. 333-65995, No. 333-78941, No. 333-74244 and No. 333-105153 of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated August 12, 2004, appearing in the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended May 29, 2004.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Foistner

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00065-JL

Shailesh Patel et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

May 12, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document # 5) is approved as submitted.

By agreement of the parties, the following affirmative

defense is stricken without prejudice: Affirmative defense #4

(fraud).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: May 12, 2008

cc: William E. Aivalikles, Esq.

William S. Saturley, Esq.

Andrew Scott Winters, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00065-JL Document 7 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Juan Fernandez, Respondent, v Cornwall Hospital, Respondent, and A. Keil, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 714]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant A. Keil appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated November 30, 2001, as, in effect, granted his motion to compel discovery and inspection of the plaintiffs biopsy on condition that he disclose the identity of his expert to the defendant Cornwall Hospital, subject to a confidentiality agreement, before the expert’s examination of the plaintiff’s biopsy slides.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*438The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellant to reveal the identity of his expert pathologist to the defendant Cornwall Hospital before his examination of the plaintiffs pathology slides which relate to the plaintiffs claims of malpractice (see *Lucarello v North Shore Univ. Hosp.,*184 AD2d 623; *Cruz v Elhosseiny,*148 AD2d 412). Proper safeguards were put in place by the court. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Travis Turcotte

v. Civil No. 08-cv-491-JL

NH State Prison, Warden, et al

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $23.60 is due no later than

January 2, 2009. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

NH State Prison for Men when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: December 1, 2008

cc: Travis Turcotte, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 NH State Prison for Men, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00491-JL Document 4 Filed 12/01/08 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending May 5, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANCO PINE S.A.                                                                                                         FBSEABanco Pine S.A., Sao Paulo, Brazil, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended, and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableCITY NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION                                                                                    CICNotice by Preston D. Pinkett, III to acquire 10 percent of City National Bancshares Corporation, Newark, New Jersey.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 05/23/2012FIVE STAR BANK                                                                                                          * BranchFive Star Bank, Warsaw, New York to establish a branch office located at 3133 Silverback Lane, Town of Erwin, Steuben County, New York. (RSSD #4400989)Newspaper: 05/14/2012Federal Register: Not applicableNONGHYUP BANK                                                                                                           FBSEANongHyup Bank, Seoul, South Korea, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 211.24 of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableRSB Bancorp, Inc                                                                                                        * 3A1RSB Bancorp, MHC and RSB Bancorp, Inc., both of Roselle, New Jersey, to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 percent of Roselle Savings Bank, Roselle, New Jersey.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 05/30/2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1



                              THOUSAND TRAILS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (Dollars and common shares in thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Six Months            Six Months
                                                                    Ended December        Ended December
                                                                       31, 1999              31, 1999
                                                                    --------------        --------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                   <C>
BASIC:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                         7,980                 7,485
                                                                    ==============        ==============
Net income allocable to common shareholders                         $        2,188        $        3,515
                                                                    ==============        ==============
Net income per common share -- basic                                $         0.27        $         0.47
                                                                    ==============        ==============

DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                         7,980                 7,485
Weighted average common stock equivalents -
  Dilutive options                                                             637                   938
  Dilutive warrants                                                             --                     6
                                                                    --------------        --------------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                         8,617                 8,429
                                                                    ==============        ==============
Net income allocable to common shareholders                         $        2,188        $        3,515
                                                                    ==============        ==============
Net income per common share -- diluted                              $         0.25        $         0.42
                                                                    ==============        ==============
</TABLE>
HAROLD LYNN STEPHENSON

,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5587

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed August 12, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, B.L. THOMAS

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 13, 2022

No. 0 4

- 21

- 00562

- CR

Yuri MEDINA

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR1596 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on or before April 12, 2 022 and was not filed. We notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency on April 21 , 202 2

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2). In that notice, we cautioned appellant that if we did not receive an adequate response by May 2

, 202 2 , we would abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See id. Neither

the brief nor a motion for extension of time t o file the brief has been filed.

Pursuant to R ule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , we abate this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent?

(a) If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of

new counsel.

(b) If the trial court finds that appellant is not indigent, the trial court should determine whether appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief.(3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because initiating contempt proceedings against appel lant’s counsel may be necessary, the trial court

should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8 (b)(4).

The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn affidavit from appellant. The trial court shall, however, order appellant’s counsel to be present at the hearing.

We ORDER the trial court to file its written fi ndings of fact and conclusions of law with the trial court clerk no later than thirty days from the date of this order. We ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in this court no later than ten days after the trial

court files i ts findings of facts and conclusions of law. We further ORDER the court reporter to file in this court a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing, along with copies of any documentary evidence admitted, no later than twenty days after the date of the hearing.

All appellate deadlines are ABATED pending further orders from this court

.

Entered on this 13 th day of May, 2022.

PER CURI AM

ATTESTED TO:

________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.1

DELOITTE (R)

                                                        SAMSON BELAIR/DELOITTE &
                                                        TOUCHE S.E.N.C.R.L.
                                                        1 Place Ville Marie
                                                        Suite 3000
                                                        Montreal QC H3B 4T9
                                                        Canada

                                                        Tel: (514) 393-7115
                                                        Fax: (514) 390-4113
                                                        www.deloitte.ca

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (registration Nos. 33-28296, 33-91824, 333-93063 and 333-6236)
pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan and Directors' Stock
Option Plan of our report dated March 13, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Campbell Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. We
also consent to incorporation by reference in the aforementioned registration
Statements of our Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants for
U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Differences dated March 13, 2006.


/s/ Samson Belair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l.
------------------------------------------------
Samson Belair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l.
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
March 30, 2006
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 2 Filed 07/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 2 Filed 07/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 2 Filed 07/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-01755-LTB Document 2 Filed 07/11/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKENS, Education Department,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference

(Docket No. 261) is granted, and the Settlement Conference set on August 22, 2013, at

3:00 p.m. is VACATED. The Motion Hearing remains set on that date and time.

Date: August 15, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 263 Filed 08/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00748

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.V. , et al., Children From the 408th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- PA

- 02364 Honorable Richard Garcia , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2012 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION In this accelerated appeal of the termination of appellant’s parental rights, no docketing statement has been filed. The clerk’s record shows that attorney Kristy L. Arellano filed a motion for new trial with the trial court , and she verbally represented to this court that she is appellant’s counsel in this appeal. However, Arellano has not filed a notice of appearance or a docketing statement. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 32.1 (requiring docketing statement) ; 4 TH T EX
. A PP
. (S AN A NTONIO ) L OC
. R. 5. 1, 5.2 (same)

. On December 6, 2011, we ordered attorney Kristy L. Arellano to file a docketing statement with this court not later than December 16, 2011. We warned Arellano that failure to comply with this order could result in this appeal being dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(c)04

- 11

- 00748

- CV

- 2

- (allowing involuntary dismissal for failure to comply with a court order). After not receiving any response from Arellano, we ordered her to show cause in writing not later than January 6, 2012, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. We again warned Arellano that if she failed to show cause in writing within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), (c); Kahanek v. Gross , No. 04

- 05

- 00106

- CV, 2005 WL 1277745, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 1, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing an appeal for failure to comply with a court order). To date, this court has not received a docketing statement, a notice of appearance, or any other filing from Arellano. Therefore, we dismiss t his appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM