alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e M a rvi n E . A s pe n, S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge ** f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f I llin o is , s ittin g b yd e s ig n a tio n . T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on * ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. L I B R AD O A L VA R E Z - B AJ O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10143 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 7 - C R - 0 1 5 2 5 - J MR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona M a rvi n E . A s pe n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry11, 2013 *** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , T A S H I M A , a n dW A R D L A W , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L i br a do A l va r e z - B a

j o appe a l s f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd chal l enges hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on and 7 8-m on th sent ence for i l l egal re entry 

# FI LED FEB 21 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 10143 2 a f t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s ua ntt o A nder s v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , A l va r e z - B a j o’ s c ouns e l ha s f

i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng tha tthe r e a r e no gr ounds f orr e l i e f , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of reco rd . W e h av e p ro v i d edA l v arez-B aj o th e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e a p ro se supp l em ent al bri ef

. N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef

has bee n f ile d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2089

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to continue for the 2001

crop year the eligibility of producers for loan deficiency payments when

the producers, although not eligible to obtain a marketing assistance

loan, produce a contract commodity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to continue for the 2001 crop year the eligibility of producers

for loan deficiency payments when the producers, although not eligible to obtain a marketing assistance loan,

produce a contract commodity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS FOR CONTRACT

4 COMMODITY PRODUCERS INELIGIBLE FOR

5 MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS.

6 Section 135(a)(2) of the Agricultural Market Transi7 tion Act (7 U.S.C. 7235(a)(2)) is amended by striking
2

•HR 2089 IH

1 ‘‘2000 crop year’’ and inserting ‘‘2000 and 2001 crop

2 years’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Thomas Trupiano

v. Case No. 09-cv-69-PB

Cottage Hospital

O R D E R

Thomas Trupiano has a medical malpractice claim against

Cottage Hospital. The Hospital has filed a motion for summary

judgment arguing that it is entitled to judgment because Trupiano

cannot produce expert testimony to support his claim. 

The deadline for making expert disclosures has passed and

Trupiano has not identified any experts. More importantly,

Trupiano has failed to produce expert testimony in response to

the motion for summary judgment. Expert testimony is required

to establish Trupiano’s medical malpractice claim. See N.H. Rev.

Stat. Ann. § 507-E:2I(c). Accordingly, the Hospital is entitled

to summary judgment. 

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 47) is

granted.

Case 1:09-cv-00069-PB Document 51 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 23, 2010

cc: Thomas Trupiano, pro se

Todd Hathaway, Esq.

Joseph Mattson, ESq

2

Case 1:09-cv-00069-PB Document 51 Filed 03/23/10 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending June 23, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodLINKBANCORP                                                                                                             * 3A1LinkBancorp, Inc., Camp Hill, PA, to form a bank holding company by acquiring Stonebridge Bank, West Chester, PA.Newspaper: 07/21/2018Federal Register: 07/17/2018SENECA FALLS SAVINGS BANK MHC, THE                                                                                      * MHC MergerSeneca Falls Savings Bank MHC ("MHC"), and its SLHC subsidiary, Seneca-Cayuga Bancorp, Inc.,  ("Bancorp") both of Seneca Falls, NY, propose to indirectly acquire Medina Savings and Loan Association, ("Medina") Medina, NY, through the merger of Medina with and into Generations Bank, Seneca Falls, NY, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bancorp.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
#### Hedrick *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24963

— Decided October 24, 1934.)

*Messrs. Mcunsfield & Merryman*and *Mr. W. S. Foulks,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George L. Lafferty,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. Francis H. Lang, Mr. Frank W. Springer, Mr. John W. Bricker,*attorney general, and *Mr. William S. Evatt,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1998: Q1... 100 * .01 13.00 4.00 23.00 32.00 22.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q1... 100 .01 4.00 17.00 17.00 29.00 23.00 9.00 2.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * * 2009: Q1... 100 39.51 21.84 28.68 5.44 3.88 * * * * * * * * * 2006: Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 42.96 22.94 21.11 8.58 2.62 1.52 * * * * * * * *  Q4... 100 52.53 18.20 16.11 8.68 3.71 .65 * * * * * * * * 2009: Q1... 100 39.51 21.84 28.68 5.44 3.88 * * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 47.26 23.81 20.08 5.22 2.50 .67 * * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 47.01 22.06 20.03 8.04 1.70 .56 .58 * * * * * * *  Q4... 100 52.92 18.49 20.52 6.08 1.47 * * * * * * * * * 2010: Q1... 100 37.01 30.51 19.83 9.88 2.15 * * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the squarter.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED FILED
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02283-BNB DENVER COLORADO
LORRAINE B. MALDONADO, SEP 1 6 2011
Plaintiff, GREGORY C. LANGHAM

CLERK

v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.

ORDER DRAWING CASE

Upon completion of the Court's review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1C, the
Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary
dismissal. Therefore, the case will be placed on the AP Docket. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be placed on the AP Docket.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 16" day of September, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

S/Craig B. Shaffer
Craig B. Shaffer

United States Magistrate Judge


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02283-BNB
Lorraine B Maldonado
4132 Clayton St
Denver, CO 80216

| hereby certify that | have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named
individuals on September 16, 2011.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By:

Deputy Clerk
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 963 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans 

Week, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself and Mr. MILLER of Florida) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Salute to 

Hospitalized Veterans Week, and for other purposes. 

Whereas February 11–15, 2008, has been designated by the 

President as National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans 

Week; 

Whereas the National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans week 

each year is an opportunity to thank a special group of 

men and women, the more than 98,000 veterans of the 

United States Armed Forces, who are cared for every day 

in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, 

outpatient clinics, domicilaries, and nursing homes; 

Whereas at the 155 VA hospitals across the Nation, there are 

veterans who face the physical and mental wounds of 

combat every day, long after their military service has 

been completed; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 963 IH 

Whereas we can never fully repay our debt of gratitude to the 

veterans, but will thank and support them with our words 

and deeds; 

Whereas Mike Vogel, motion picture actor and star of the 

newly-released ‘‘Cloverfield’’, will lead the VA’s annual 

patient recognition program as the national spokesperson, inviting the public to visit and honor hospitalized 

veterans during National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans 

Week; and 

Whereas Mike Vogel will be the youngest celebrity to lead the 

National Salute, bringing youthful energy to the program 

at a time when the number of young combat veterans 

under the care of the VA is growing, and as the VA is 

looking to younger generations of Americans to replenish 

an aging volunteer force: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the National Salute to Hospital3 ized Veterans Program and its efforts to pay tribute 

4 to and express appreciation for hospitalized veterans, 

5 to increase community awareness of the role of VA 

6 medical centers, and to encourage citizens to visit 

7 hospitalized veterans and become involved as volun8 teers; 

9 (2) encourages citizens who live near a VA hos10 pital or clinic to take time this week to visit and 

11 thank our veterans; and 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 963 IH 

1 (3) will continue to work with veterans service 

2 organizations to support our veterans with words, 

3 actions, and financial assistance. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 873 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 171
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 873

                          [Report No. 110-493]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2007

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of December 17, 2007, 
providing for consideration of any of the following measures:
            (1) The Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making 
        appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, 
        and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
        2008, and for other purposes.
            (2) The Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 6) to reduce 
        our Nation's dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, 
        renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new 
        emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency, 
        and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables 
        Reserve to invest in alternative energy, and for other 
        purposes.
                                                 House Calendar No. 171

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 873

                          [Report No. 110-493]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 13, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-51744, No. 33-65239, No. 333-12189, No. 333-62187, No.
333-84219 and No. 333-38884) pertaining to the 1991 Stock Option Plan of
MSC.Software Corporation, the MSC.Software Corporation 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan of MSC.Software Corporation, the
Executive Bonus Plan of MSC.Software Corporation and the 2000 Executive Cash
or Stock Bonus Plan, and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-89317 and No. 333-86809) of
MSC.Software Corporation and the related Prospectuses and amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-89319) and the related
Prospectus of our report dated February 28, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of MSC.Software Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2001
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

To: Chris Daniel February 11

, 2015

County: Harris (C riminal )

Subject: RETURN OF ORIGINAL EXHIBITS

Ple ase acknowled ge the receipt of the original exhibits listed below. Please sign and return

the original to this court.

14

- 10

- 00383

- CR Ronald Eugene Tiller v The State of Texas 1197877

State's Exhibit 1, a CD

Received by: _______________________________________

_

Received on: ________________________________________
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2006...... 67.9 7.4 6.4 30.3 7.9 15.8 2.8 5.4 14.0 45.7 2007...... 64.8 5.6 5.6 32.5 5.5 15.6 2.7 5.7 14.8 41.6 2008...... 77.6 5.6 7.4 40.2 3.8 20.7 2.5 5.7 15.1 54.4 2005: Q3... 59.1 3.4 6.1 24.4 10.1 15.2 3.2 4.7 12.6 38.7  Q4... 46.4 10.2 5.5 18.8 3.2 8.7 2.2 4.1 11.0 29.1 2006: Q1... 67.0 5.3 6.2 40.2 4.5 10.9 2.9 4.7 14.3 45.1  Q2... 80.2 5.0 6.2 34.8 16.6 17.7 3.3 6.7 15.4 54.7  Q3... 63.5 9.2 7.3 21.8 5.2 20.0 2.6 5.6 12.2 43.2  Q4... 60.8 10.0 6.1 24.5 5.4 14.8 2.3 4.7 14.1 39.7 2007: Q1... 69.6 5.9 5.3 40.0 3.5 14.9 2.3 4.8 13.4 49.1  Q2... 61.7 3.7 4.1 35.0 5.4 13.5 3.4 6.8 16.2 35.3  Q3... 53.6 3.3 4.9 23.9 7.5 14.1 2.6 5.4 13.1 32.4  Q4... 74.4 9.3 8.3 31.2 5.5 20.1 2.7 5.7 16.3 49.7 2008: Q1... 83.7 6.6 5.9 47.7 3.2 20.3 2.3 5.6 14.0 61.9  Q2... 76.7 4.5 6.3 39.4 5.8 20.7 2.9 5.6 16.5 51.6  Q3... 69.1 3.3 7.6 35.3 3.9 19.0 2.4 5.3 12.8 48.5  Q4... 81.1 8.0 9.7 38.5 2.3 22.6 2.6 6.1 17.0 55.4 2009: Q1... 96.4 5.9 5.5 63.8 4.8 16.5 2.3 5.3 15.9 72.9  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1992: Q1... 51.9 18.9 33.0 -2.1 2.7 -4.6 4.9 8.2 3.1

 Q2... 55.1 19.5 35.6 6.2 3.3 7.8 4.9 8.1 3.2

 Q3... 56.2 19.9 36.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 4.2 8.6 1.9

 Q4... 54.5 19.9 34.7 -2.9 -.2 -4.4 2.9 7.8 .2

1993: Q1... 52.8 20.0 32.8 -3.2 .5 -5.3 1.7 5.6 -.5

 Q2... 56.0 20.6 35.4 6.0 3.1 7.8 1.6 5.4 -.6

 Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00357-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. TROY A. ASHLEY; and

2. BRANDON D. SMITH,

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#33) on November 14, 2011, by Defendant Troy A. Ashley. The Court construes this Notice as

a motion to change his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea

agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for December 28, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for April 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

Case 1:11-cr-00357-MSK Document 35 Filed 11/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

3. The final trial preparation conference set for December 16, 2011, and the

December 19, 2011, trial date are VACATED.

Dated this 16th day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00357-MSK Document 35 Filed 11/16/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2