alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 21
Case 1:11-cv-02277-PAB-MJW Document 32 Filed 11/28/11 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 21
[744 NYS2d 340]

#### In the Matter of Stephen M. Moskowitz, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

June 3, 2002

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Diana Maxfield Kearse,*Brooklyn *CMelissa D. Broder*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

By opinion and order of the Supreme Court of California dated September 18, 2001, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of six *6months, the execution of which was stayed on the conditions that he be placed on probation for a period of two years and that he be actually suspended for a period of 30 days.

On March 19, 2002, the petitioner served the respondent with a notice, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, advising him of his right to file a verified statement raising any of the defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline found in that section and to request a hearing prior to the imposition of such discipline. The respondent has not submitted the aforementioned verified statement or requested a hearing.

Inasmuch as the respondent has neither raised any of the enumerated defenses to the imposition of reciprocal discipline nor requested a hearing pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 (d), the petitioner’s motion to impose reciprocal discipline upon him in New York is granted. The respondent is censured based on the discipline imposed on him in California.

Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci, Altman and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, the respondent is censured based on the discipline imposed on him in California.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
         Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-70628, 33-75184, 333-28135, and
         333-42424) of Calton, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2002
         relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule, which
         appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November
         30, 2001.

         /s/Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.

         Tampa, Florida
         February 22, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-70628, 33-75184, 333-28135, 333-42424 and 333-108208) of
Calton, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 2004, except for Note1.B. as to
which date is February 4, 2005, relating to the financial statements for the
year ended November 30, 2003 and 2002 which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2003.




                                        /s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.




Tampa, Florida
February 23, 2005
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 22, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 22, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0050. 1420 HWY 20, LLLP v. RICHFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2016CV02027
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00716

- CV

Maria SANCHEZ d/b/a Progressive Painters,

Appellant

v.

Michael SCHROECK and Rebecca Schroeck,

Appellees

From the 33rd District Court, Burnet County, Texas

Trial Court No. 38284

Honorable Guilford L. Jones, III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

REVERSED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

It is ordered that appellant recover her costs of appeal from appellees.

SIGNED June 26, 2013.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the No. 51278

- 5

- II

Personal Restraint of

KAMARA KAM CHOUAP,

Petitioner.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

M ELNICK

, J.

— Kamara Chouap seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from his

2010 conviction for assault in the second degree. 1 The trial court sentenced him to 120 months of

confinement and 18 months of community custody. That sentence exceeds the statutory maximum

sentence of 120 months. RCW 9A.20.021(1)(b).

Chouap argues that he is entitled to have his term of confinement reduced to 102 months

so he can be allowed to serve his 18

- month term of community custody. 2 The State concedes that

Chouap’s sentence exceeds the statutory maximum sentence, but that under In re Personal

Restraint of McWilliams , 182 Wn.2d 213, 218, 340 P .3d 223 (2014), Chouap is entitled only to the

1 He does not seek relief from his convictions for two counts of attempting to evade a pursuing

police vehicle.

2 Because Chouap’s judgment and sentence is facially invalid, his petition, which was transferred

to us by the trial court under CrR 7.8(b), is not time

- barred by RCW 10.73.090(1). Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

June 5, 2018No. 51278

- 5

- II

2

addition to his judgment and sentence of a Brooks 3 notation that under no circumstances shall the

combined terms of confinement and of community custody exceed the statutory maximum

sentence.

We agree with t he State and remand Chouap’s judgment and sentence for addition of a

Brooks notation that under no circumstances shall the combined terms of confinement and of

community custody exceed the statutory maximum sentence. 4

A majority of the panel having det ermined that this opinion will not be printed in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040,

it is so ordered.

MELNICK, J.

We concur:

JOHANSON, P.J.

SUTTON, J.

3 In re Personal Restraint of Brooks , 166 Wn.2d 664, 675, 211 P.3d 1023 (20 09).

4 Because Chouap was sentenced before the legislature overruled Brooks by enacting RCW

9.94A.701(9), Brooks is applicable to him. See McWilliams , 182 Wn.2d at 218.
CONSENT OF EXPERTS and COUNSEL


CONSENT of INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-83269) pertaining to
the 1979 Long-term Incentive Plan, the 1982 Incentive Stock
Option Plan and Performance Dividend Plan, Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-89499) pertaining to the 1984 Long-
term Incentive Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
20503) pertaining to the 1987 Long-term Incentive Plan,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-33623) pertaining to
the Retirement Savings Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-
8 No. 33-44423) pertaining to the 1991 Long-term Incentive
Plan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56403)
pertaining to the 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan,
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36743) pertaining
to the 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan of Cincinnati Milacron
Inc. of our report dated February 6, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Cincinnati Milacron
Inc. for the year ended December 27, 1997.





                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Cincinnati, Ohio
March 13, 1998
Exhibit 32(a)



TXU CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO



The undersigned, C. John Wilder, President and Chief Executive of TXU Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 4th day of November, 2005.



/s/    C. JOHN
WILDERName:

C. John WilderTitle:

President and Chief Executive




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 11Federal Reserve Bank of: DallasFilings received during the week ending October 6, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADAM BANK GROUP, INC.                                                                                                   * 3A3Application by Adam Bank Group, Inc., College Station, Texas, to acquire Andrews Holding Company, and indirectly, Commercial State Bank, both of Andrews, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/06/2018CADENCE BANCORPORATION                                                                                                  * 3A3Application by Cadence Bancorporation, Houston, Texas, to acquire State Bank Financial Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, and indirectly, State Bank and Trust Company, Macon, Georgia.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/19/2018FROST BANK                                                                                                              * BranchApplication by Frost Bank, San Antonio, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 2120 Spring Stuebner Road, Suite 630, Spring, Texas 77389.Newspaper: 10/04/2018Federal Register: Not applicableFROST BANK                                                                                                              * BranchApplication by Frost Bank, San Antonio, Texas, to establish a branch at 7602 North Navarro Street, Victoria, Texas 77904.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableHAPPY STATE BANK                                                                                                        * BranchApplication by Happy State Bank, Happy, Texas, to establish a branch at 1901 Central Drive, Bedford, Texas 76021.Newspaper: 10/13/2018Federal Register: Not applicableORIGIN BANK                                                                                                             * BranchApplication by Origin Bank, Choudrant, Louisiana, to establish a branch at 1808 Sylvan Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75208.Newspaper: 10/13/2018Federal Register: Not applicablePLAINSCAPITAL BANK                                                                                                      * BranchApplication by PlainsCapital Bank, Dallas, Texas, to establish a branch at 550 Reserve Street, Southlake, Texas 76092.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableVERITEX HOLDINGS, INC.                                                                                                  * 3A5
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2025

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all individuals a

deduction for Federal, State, and local highway motor fuel sales taxes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mr. MANZULLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow all

individuals a deduction for Federal, State, and local

highway motor fuel sales taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gasoline Price Relief

5 Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL

7 HIGHWAY MOTOR FUEL SALES TAXES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to taxes) is amended by redes-
2

•HR 2025 IH

1 ignating subsection (g) as subsection (h) and by inserting

2 after subsection (f) the following new subsection:

3 ‘‘(g) HIGHWAY MOTOR FUEL TAXES.—In the case

4 of an individual, in addition to the taxes otherwise allow5 able as a deduction under this section, there shall be al6 lowed as a deduction for the taxable year an amount equal

7 to the sum of—

8 ‘‘(1) the State and local excise and sales taxes

9 paid by the taxpayer on gasoline (other than avia10 tion gasoline), diesel fuel, and any other fuel used in

11 a motor vehicle, and

12 ‘‘(2) with respect to each gallon of such gaso13 line, diesel fuel, and other fuel, an amount equal to

14 the portion of the price of such fuel which is equal

15 to the rate of tax imposed on such fuel under chap16 ter 31 or 32.

17 An amount shall be allowed as a deduction under the pre18 ceding sentence only if verified in such manner as the Sec19 retary shall prescribe.’’

20 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAX21 PAYER ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a)

22 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting after

23 paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:

24 ‘‘(18) HIGHWAY MOTOR FUEL TAXES.—The de25 duction allowed by section 163(g).’’
3

•HR 2025 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid after December

3 31, 2000.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas C. Corley, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Calton, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
     covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.


Date: February 20, 2004

/s/ Thomas C. Corley
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### MILLER v. PLAQUEMINES PARISH DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.

No. 18092.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 10, 1943.

Leander H. Perez, of New Orleans, for Clarence T. Kimble.

John J. Jackson, of New Orleans, for Charles Miller.

PER CURIAM.

On December 8, 1943, at the instance of counsel for the plaintiff in this proceeding, we issued a rule nisi ordering Clarence T. Kimble, Acting Clerk of the 25th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Plaque-mines, to show cause why the original record in this suit should not be sent up to this Court immediately. This rule was made returnable Friday, December 10, 1943, at 10:30 A.M., at which time Leander H. Perez appeared as counsel for the said clerk and filed a return which, in substance, declared that the failure of the clerk to complete the record and to forward it to this Court was due entirely to the fault of the appellant in that he failed to pay or make arrangements for payment of stenographer’s fees in connection with the preparation of the transcript of evidence taken on the trial below, and there is attached to the Clerk’s return a certificate of Ferdinand E. Zimmer, the sworn official Court Reporter, to that effect.

No appearance was made on behalf of Charles Miller, plaintiff in rule, and no objection has been made to or criticism of the Clerk’s return by any interested party. The unquestioned explanation of the clerk of his failure to complete the record is sufficient to justify his action in the premises. See Bentley v. Barrett, La.App., 144 So. 187 and many other cases.

For the reasons assigned the rule heretofore issued by us will be discharged.

JANVIER, J., absent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      541
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        229
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,993
<PP&E>                                          63,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,094
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,979
<BONDS>                                          1,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,355
<SALES>                                          3,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,230
<CGS>                                              802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,190)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.45)
<FN>
<F1>Represents par value of Reading Entertainment Series B preferred stock
</FN>


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|   | 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended                September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C.                78m                or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | BY:  | /s/                John Lackland       |   |
|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |      | John                Lackland           |   |
|   |      | Chief                Financial Officer |   |

----