alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

--------------------- No. 01-31402 Summary Calendar

---------------------

EDWARD DIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant

JOE L. SMITH,

Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

THE REVELATION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.; ET AL.,

Defendants - Intervenor Defendants

THE REVELATION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant - Intervenor Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(98-CV-863-A)

November 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Edward Dixon and Joe L. Smith appeal the district court’s

judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of The Revelation

Corporation of America, Inc. (“RCA”), dismissing their claims for2

attorneys’ fees and for detrimental reliance on RCA’s alleged

promises of employment.

Wit h respect to their claims for attorneys’ fees, the

appellants argue that the district court’s written findings of fact

and conclusions of law are inconsistent with the court’s oral

statements, following completion of the bench trial, that the

appellants had a viable claim for attorneys’ fees. The district

c ourt’s oral statements were not formal findings of fact and

conclusions of law. The court made clear that it was “just kind of

sharing” its thoughts with counsel. After sharing those thoughts,

the district court took the matter under advisement. Upon further

study, the district court found, in writing, that the legal

services rendered by the appellants were performed on behalf of the

National Baptist Convention of America, Inc. (“NBCA”), rather than

on behalf of RCA. That finding of fact is not clearly erroneous.

The district court observed further that there was no evidence that

NBCA ever approved the appellants’ attorneys’ fee invoices or

submitted them to RCA for reimbursement. Accordingly, the district

court did not err by concluding that the appellants were not owed

any attorneys’ fees by RCA.

Furthermore, the distri ct court did not commit reversible

error in concluding that the appellants failed to prove that any

offer of empl oyment was ever made to them by RCA or by any

authorized person on behalf of RCA. Therefore, the district court3

did not err by dismissing the appellants’ claims for detrimental

reliance.

The judgment of the distr ict court is AFFIRMED, essentially

for the reas ons stated by the district court in its Findings of

Fact and Conclusions of Law. Dixon v. The Revelation Corporation

of America, Inc., et al.

, Civ. Action No. 98-863-A (M.D. La., Nov.

9, 2001).

A F F I R M E D.
#### Industrial Commission of Ohio *v.*St. John.

(No. 24689

— Decided November 21, 1934.)

*Mr. John W. Brisker,*attorney general, and *Mr. R. R. Zurmehly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Osias & Ozias*and *Mr. W. 8. Rhotehamel,*for defendant in error.

It appears from the record on file in this court that upon hearing of an application for rehearing before the Industrial Commission the claimant sought to introduce in evidence papers contained in the file of the Industrial Commission, including a stenographic transcript of an oral hearing held before a referee; that objection was made, sustained and exception noted to the introduction of such transcript at the rehearing; that claimant was denied the right to participate in the Workmen’s Compensation Fund for the death of her husband; that on appeal to the Court of Common *641Pleas, a jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury and upon the transcript of testimony and record taken before the Industrial Commission; that the record in this court discloses that each and every objection to the introduction of evidence was sustained by the Industrial Commission and an exception noted, and the record in this court does not show whether the Court of Common Pleas ruled upon any of the objections entered at the hearing on rehearing; and that the petition in error filed in this court claims that “the court erred in the admission of evidence.”

In view of the fact that the record before this court does not disclose specifically what evidence was admitted or rejected by the Court of Common Pleas on appeal, and this court is therefore unable to determine from the record before it what evidence was received or rejected by the Common Pleas Court, it is hereby ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7723

TYRONE DELANO GILLIAM, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MORUGI MUNGAI, M.D.; DR. MEILLER, Psychiatrist; PAUL KNIGHT, Case Management Counselor;

KEVIN KNIGHT, Psychiatrist,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-3096)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Delano Gilliam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran,

Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gilliam v. Mungai, No. CA-94-3096 (D. Md. Sept. 13, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56809-56810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22922]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Paducah

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Paducah. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register. 
This meeting is being held in place of the September 18, 2008, meeting, 
which was cancelled.

DATES: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Barkley Centre, 111 Memorial Drive, Paducah, Kentucky 42001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reinhard Knerr, Deputy Designated 
Federal Officer, Department of Energy Paducah Site Office, Post Office 
Box 1410, MS-103, Paducah, Kentucky 42001, (270) 441-6825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental

[[Page 56810]]

restoration, waste management and related activities.

Tentative Agenda:

 Call to Order, Introductions, Review of Agenda.
 Deputy Designated Federal Officer's Comments.
 Federal Coordinator's Comments.
 Liaisons' Comments.
 Presentation.
 Retreat Review--Work Plan Approval.
 EM SSAB Chairs Meeting Review.
 Public Comments.
 Administrative Issues--Motions;
    [cir] Chair-Elect Election,
    [cir] Recommendations.
 Final Comments.
 Adjourn.

Breaks Taken as Appropriate

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Reinhard Knerr at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public comment 
will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Reinhard 
Knerr at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also 
be available at the following Web site: http://www.pgdpcab.org/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC on September 24, 2008.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-22922 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2194 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2194

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-methyl imadazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-methyl imadazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1-METHYL IMADAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.30.25    1-methyl          Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     imidazole (CAS                                                          31/2004          ''
                     No. 616-47-7)                                                                             .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2933.29.90)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending November 21, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOAST NATIONAL BANK                                                                                                     MemberCoast National Bank, San Luis Obispo, California, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableGUARANTY FEDERAL BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                       CICNotice by Castle Creek Capital Partners V, LP, and persons or entities that are acting with or control Castle Creek Capital Partners V, LP, including Castle Creek Capital V LLC, Castle Creek Advisors IV LLC, JME Advisory Corp., Legions IV Corp., Mikesell Advisory Corp., Pietrzak Advisory Corp., Scavuzzo Advisory Corp., Volk Advisory Corp., Rana Advisory Corp., Szumski Advisory Corp., John M. Eggemeyer, III, Mark G. Merlo, J. Mikesell Thomas, John T. Pietrzak, Anthony R. Scavuzzo, David J. Volk, Sundeep Rana, and Martin Szumski, all of Rancho Santa Fe, California, and Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Master Retirement Trust, of Rochester, Minnesota, to acquire up to 24.9 percent of the voting shares of Guaranty Federal Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Guaranty Bank, both of Springfield, Missouri.Newspaper: 11/23/2015Federal Register: 11/24/2015HOMESTREET, INC.                                                                                                        4c8
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Robert W.
Piper, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert W. Piper
-----------------------------
Robert W. Piper
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2170

For the relief of Steven Joseph Sweeney.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 2001

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Steven Joseph Sweeney.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, DE4 NIAL OF ADMISSION TO, STEVEN JOSEPH

5 SWEENEY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 212(a)

7 and 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ste8 ven Joseph Sweeney may not be removed from the United

9 States, or denied admission to the United States, by rea10 son of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial

11 of admission and is reflected in the records of the Immi12 gration and Naturalization Service of the Department of
2

•HR 2170 IH

1 Justice, or the Visa Office of the Department of State,

2 on the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RESCISSION OF OUTSTANDING ORDER OF RE4 MOVAL.—The Attorney General shall rescind any out5 standing order of removal, or any finding of inadmis6 sibility or deportability, that has been entered against Ste7 ven Joseph Sweeney by reason of any act described in sub8 section (a).

9 (c) ESTABLISHMENT OF GOOD MORAL CHAR10 ACTER.—Notwithstanding section 101(f) of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act, any act described in subsection

12 (a) may not be considered in determining whether Steven

13 Joseph Sweeney is, or during any period has been, a per14 son of good moral character for purposes of the Immigra15 tion and Nationality Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
   
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         155,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,665
<PP&E>                                         491,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                 440,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 657,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,311,557
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,301,359
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   657,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,828,335
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             144,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,847,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,796,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (42,394)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,847,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 971 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 13, 2008. 

Whereas on the evening of Tuesday, February 5th, 2008, 

more than 100 tornados devastated communities in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee; 

Whereas more than 50 lives were lost in the deadliest tornado 

outbreak in the United States in more than 20 years; 

Whereas more than a thousand homes, schools, and businesses were destroyed and tens of thousands of residents 

of the Mississippi Valley have been left without power; 

Whereas the effect of the storms on Mississippi Valley families and businesses is still being felt; 

Whereas hundreds of volunteers took time from their daily 

lives to help ensure that the victims of the storm are 

sheltered, clothed, fed, and emotionally comforted 

through this traumatic event; 

Whereas the Federal Emergency Management Agency, first 

responders, the National Guard, and additional emergency personnel have coordinated with local authorities 

and firefighters and have performed beyond the call of 

duty in the preservation and protection of human lives; 

and 
2 

•HRES 971 EH 

Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the citizens of the Mississippi Valley have been evident following 

the tornados: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the citizens 

of the States hit by the storms over the devastation 

caused by the powerful tornados that struck their communities on February 5th, 2008; 

(2) expresses its appreciation to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, first responders, and the 

others involved in the relief effort for their valiant service to those affected by the storms; and 

(3) expresses its support as the citizens of these 

communities continue their efforts to rebuild their community and their lives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### ITEM CO., Limited, v. CODIFER & BONNABEL, Inc.

No. 13810.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 11, 1932.

Fred. C. Querens, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Deutsch & Kerrigan and Bert Flanders, Jr., all of New Orleans, for appellee.

WE STERFIELD, J.

This is a suit on an advertising contract for the sum of $130. There was judgment below as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

The Item Company, Limited, plaintiff herein, is the publisher of a morning and evening newspaper in the city of New Orleans. It entered into a contract with Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., defendant herein, to run certain advertising matter to be supplied by defendant for a certain period of time.

The advertisement as it appeared in plaintiff’s newspaper was as follows:

“Opportunity Awaits You in Lindbergh Glen Annex at Slidell

“Lots 70x630 — Titles Guaranteed, $250.00 Each — On E-Z Terms

“Codifer Development Co.,

“107 Balter Bldg. Ra. 3711.”

When demand was made for settlement, the secretary of defendant company, at first agreed to pay upon a definite date, handing plaintiff’s collector a written promise, reading as follows:

“Mr. Credit Man:

“This account will he paid on October 20, 1929.

“[Signed] T. R. Codifer.”

The bill was not paid and this suit was subsequently filed. If is defended upon the ground that the advertising, though printed in accordance with the terms of the contract, did not bear the name of Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., defendant herein, but the name of Codifer Development Company, which, it is pointed out, is a different corporation.

It appears that Codifer & Bonnabel, Inc., and the Codifer Development Company are both engaged in the exploitation and sale of certain rural property in St. Tammany parish. The officers of the two corporations are practically the same. Their headquarters are in the same building, the same room in fact, and the telephone number is the same. The secretary of one corporation is the secretary of the other, a situation which is calculated to deceive any one who may have any business transactions with either corporation. But, of course, a creditor of one corporation cannqt demand payment of its debt from the other simply because of the difficulty in distinguishing one from the other.

Here, however, Co.difer & Bonnabel, Inc., entered into the contract with plaintiff and supplied the advertising matter, and the fact that the advertisement did not bear the name of that corporation is' immaterial. We are convinced that the advertising supplied by defendant was for use in connection with its contract and was selected by officers of that corporation for that purpose. We are confirmed in this view by ’the fact that the subject of the advertising “Lindbergh Glen Annex” is admittedly owned by defendant corporation and not by the Codifer Development Company whose name appears in the advertisement.

This evidently was the view of the trial court, and we are of the opinion that its judgment was correct.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.