alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007...... 100.0 3.2 12.3 36.6 29.4 11.8 4.5 2.2 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008...... 100.0 7.4 15.2 35.0 27.0 9.9 3.8 1.6 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2 2009...... 100.0 12.2 19.7 34.8 22.4 7.9 2.0 1.1 7.0 -2.0 .7 -.2 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.3 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.7 4.6 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.4 6.6 .9 .7  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 1.5 .3 .2  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 2.5 .6 .3  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 7.6 2.4 .8 .3  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2 2009: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1.8 .5 .2 .0  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.7 -.3 .4 .0  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.5 -.5 .6 -.1  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 7.0 -2.0 .7 -.2  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending July 7, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodWEST-CENTRAL BANCORP, INC.                                                                                              CICNotice by The First Neighborhood Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan by its Trustees Garlan Miller, Richard E. Bowlby, and Charles L. Staats, of Spencer, West Virginia, and Jeanette Atkinson of Reedy, West Virginia, to retain control of 10.71% of the shares of West-Central Bancorp, Inc., Spencer, West Virginia.  This group would retain control of 13.59% of West-Central Bancorp, Inc., when including the shares individually controlled by the trustees.Newspaper: 07/18/2007Federal Register: 07/26/2007
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ Mark GoldwasserMark GoldwasserChief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2011
<PAGE>   1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Jefferies Group, Inc.:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
2-94727 dated December 6, 1984; No. 33-17065 dated September 8, 1987; No.
33-19741 dated January 21, 1988; No. 33-65318 dated May 27, 1993; No. 33-64490
dated June 15, 1993; No. 33-52139 dated February 3, 1994; No. 33-54373 dated
June 30, 1994, and No. 333-02489 dated April 12, 1996, all on Form S-8, and No.
33-54265 dated July 14, 1994, and No. 333-40263 dated December 5, 1997, both on
Form S-4 of Jefferies Group, Inc. of our report dated January 20, 1998, except
as to note 19 to the consolidated financial statements, which is as of March 17,
1998, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Jefferies Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Jefferies Group, Inc.
 
                                          /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
March 18, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART,

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants.

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT

The United States of America, by and through UnitedStates Attorney John F. Walsh

and Assistant United States Attorneys Linda Kaufman and Martha Paluch, respectfully

moves to restrict Document, any order revealing the contents of that document, and the

brief filed in support of this motion, for the reasons stated in the brief filed in support of this

motion. The United States requests a “Level 3" Restriction which would make the

document, any order revealing the contents of that document and the brief filed in support

of this motion, “Viewable by Filer & Court” only. 

Respectfully submitted this 11th day of July, 2013.

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

By: s/ Linda Kaufman 

Linda Kaufman, Assistant United States Attorney

U.S. Attorney’s Office

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100 / Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

1

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 310 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
By: s/ Martha A. Paluch 

 Martha A. Paluch, Assistant United States Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100 / Facsimile: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Martha.Paluch@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Government

2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 310 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 11th day of July, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT with the Clerk of the Court using

the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following e-mail

addresses:

Martin Adam Stuart

E-mail: martinstuartlaw@solucian.com

William Lewis Taylor

E-mail: wltaylorpc@gmail.com

Darlene Ann Bagley

E-mail: bagley@ridleylaw.com

Paula M. Ray

E-mail: paulamray@earthlnk.net

 By: s/ Solange Reigel 

SOLANGE REIGEL

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney's Office

1225 - 17th Street, Suite 700

Denver, CO 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0244

Fax: (303) 454-0402

E-mail: Solange.Reigel@usdoj.gov

3

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 310 filed 07/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3
213 La. 797

#### In re Liquidation of HIBERNIA BANK & TRUST CO., on Opposition of Harry W. Belfor.

No. 38902.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 26, 1948.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1948.

Harry W. Belfor, in pro. per.

Ellis, Ellis & Lancaster, Milling, God-chaux, Saal & Milling, and M. Truman Woodward, Jr., all of New Orleans, amici curiae.

Montgomery, Fenner & Brown, Dufour, St. Paul & Levy and John St. Paul, Jr., all of New Orleans, for defendants-ap-pellees.

HAMITER, Justice.

For the reasons assigned in. 35 So.2d 733, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKENS, Education Department, 

Defendants. 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE AND RESET FINAL 

TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and 

Reset Final Trial Preparation Conference, and being fully advised on the 

premises, hereby 

GRANTS the motion. The Final Trial Preparation Conference is reset to 

August 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. 

Dated: August 5, 2013

s/ David M. Ebel

Judge David M. Ebel

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 257 Filed 08/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1






              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











August 14, 2002                        /s/ RICHARD J. LAMPEN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard J. Lampen
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 930 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 25, 2008.
Whereas there are over 15,000,000 secondary and postsecondary career and 
        technical education students in the United States;
Whereas nationwide, there are over 10,000 secondary high schools and career tech 
        centers and over 9,000 postsecondary institutions offering career and 
        technical education programs;
Whereas a competitive global economy requires workers trained in skilled 
        professions;
Whereas career and technical education plays a crucial role in preparing a well-
        educated and skilled workforce in America;
Whereas career and technical education prepares students for all of the 20 
        fastest growing occupations identified by the U.S. Department of Labor;
Whereas according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, nearly 75 percent of 
        employers report severe conditions when trying to hire qualified workers 
        and 40 percent say that applicants are poorly skilled;
Whereas students taking career and technical education courses have higher grade 
        point averages in college, are less likely to drop out in high school 
        and college, and have better employment and earnings outcomes than other 
        students;
Whereas, in 2006, Congress reauthorized with bipartisan support the Carl D. 
        Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which provides states with 
        Federal resources to support career and technical education programs; 
        and
Whereas the Association for Career and Technical Education has designated 
        February as ``Career and Technical Education Month'' to celebrate career 
        and technical education across the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Career and Technical Education 
        month;
            (2) recognizes the importance of career and technical education in 
        preparing a well-educated and skilled workforce in America; and
            (3) encourages educators, counselors, and administrators to promote 
        career and technical education as an option to students.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Biagio Guiliano, Respondent, v Raymond G. Carlisle et al., Defendants, Highview-Nyack Properties, Inc., Respondent, and Law Firm of Howard Mann, Appellant. (And Three Third-Party Actions.)

[744 NYS2d 895]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Law Firm of Howard Mann appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), entered March 26, 2001, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to amend his complaint to add new claims against it, and granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Highview-Nyack Properties, Inc., which was for leave to amend its answer to add a new cross claim against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The determination whether to grant leave to amend a pleading is within the sound discretion of the court *(see Mayers v*
      *439
      *D’Agostino,*58 NY2d 696, 698), to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Not only is the determination to grant leave to amend discretionary, but such a determination “will not lightly be set aside” *(Beuschel v Malm,*114 AD2d 569; *see Napoli v Canada Dry Bottling Co. of N.Y.,*166 AD2d 696; *Ross v Ross,*143 AD2d 429). Leave to amend a pleading should be freely given absent prejudice or surprise (see CPLR 3025 [b]; *McCaskey, Davies & Assoc. v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*59 NY2d 755, 757). Where such pleadings are devoid of merit, leave should be denied (see *Frost v Monter,*202 AD2d 632).

The appellant failed to establish prejudice or surprise, and the claims in the proposed amended pleadings are not devoid of merit. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for leave to amend his complaint to add new claims against the appellant, and properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Highview-Nyack Properties, Inc., which was for leave to amend its answer to add a new cross claim against the appellant.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, John R. McKowen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Navidec, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registratant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  December 11, 2003


/s/  John R.McKowen
-------------------------------
John R. McKowen
Chief Executive Officer and
   Principal Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Case No. 08-cr-34-01-SM

Mark Williams

ORDER

Re: Document No. 37, Motion for Transcript at Government

Expense 

Ruling: Denied. Petitioner seeks free transcripts to support

his anticipated filing of a motion under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255,

but he does not disclose what issue or issues he expects to raise

that require reference to a transcript. The burden is on

petitioner to “come into court with his case, not simply to try to

make one out. This does not mean, of course, with his full case,

but he must show merit, not just personal opinion.” Ellis v. State

of Maine, 448 F.2d 1325, 1327 (1st Cir. 1971). And, under the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 753(f), the court cannot certify

that defendant’s motion for relief under Section 2255 (which has

not been filed) is not frivolous and that transcripts are needed to

decide an issues presented. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: November 9, 2009 

cc: Mark Williams, pro se 

 Terry Ollila, AUSA

 Thomas McCue, Esq. 

Case 1:08-cr-00034-SM Document 40 Filed 11/09/09 Page 1 of 1
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

       I, Stephen D. Rubin, the President of Vita Food Products, Inc., certify
that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vita Food Products,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  August 13, 2004

By:    /s/ Stephen D. Rubin
   --------------------------------------
           Stephen D. Rubin
             PRESIDENT
      (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

                                       18