alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02230-LTB

TRACY WILLIAMSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

PAULA J. FRANTZ, MD, 

BETH DALLAS, Over Medical, 

CHAMJOCK/NURSE PRACTITIONER, 

WEEDER LT./Supervisor Intake, 

JOHN DOE/Nurse over Appliance, 

CHRISTIANS/SGT., Over Intake, and 

JOHN DOE/COLORADO DEPARTMENT CORRECTION[sic], 

Defendants. 

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

On January 9, 2012, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Plaintiff to Have Voluntary

Dismissal of 42 U.S.C. § 1983" (Doc. No. 14), which the Court will treat as a notice of

voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The

notice is moot. The instant action was already dismissed by an order and judgment on

December 15, 2011.

Dated: January 10, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02230-LTB Document 15 Filed 01/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Hedger *v.*Hammond et al.

(No. 24557

— Decided March 14, 1934.)

*Mr. James J. Fitzpatrick,*for plaintiff in error.

' *Messrs. Hightower & O’Brien, Mr. W. W. Glippinger, Mr. L. M. Ireton, Messrs. Kunkel & Kunkel, Mr. George 8. Hawke, Mr. Richard Remke, Mr. James J. Fitzpatrick*and *Messrs. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error he, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1991...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 3.7 1.4 2.3 .7 1.6

1992...... .6 .2 .4 .1 .3 3.2 1.2 2.0 .6 1.4

1993...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.5 .5 1.1

1994...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

1993: Q3... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .8 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q4... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.5 .5 1.1

1994: Q1... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 3.1 1.3 1.8 .7 1.1

 Q2... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 .8 1.6 .6 .9

 Q3... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.1 .7 1.3 .5 .8

 Q4... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995: Q1... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 3.1 1.3 1.8 .7 1.0

 Q2... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.6 .7 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .1 .2 2.4 .9 1.6 .6 .9

 Q4... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.7 1.6 2.1 1.0 1.2

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 3.0 1.1 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1840

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To extend eligibility for refugee status of unmarried sons

and daughters of certain Vietnamese refugees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1840 RFS

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR REFUGEE STATUS.

2 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR IN-COUNTRY REFUGEE PROC3 ESSING IN VIETNAM.—For purposes of eligibility for in4 country refugee processing for nationals of Vietnam dur5 ing fiscal years 2002 and 2003, an alien described in sub6 section (b) shall be considered to be a refugee of special

7 humanitarian concern to the United States (within the

8 meaning of section 207 of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157)) and shall be admitted to the

10 United States for resettlement if the alien would be admis11 sible as an immigrant under the Immigration and Nation12 ality Act (except as provided in section 207(c)(3) of that

13 Act).

14 (b) ALIENS COVERED.—An alien described in this

15 subsection is an alien who—

16 (1) is the son or daughter of a qualified na17 tional;

18 (2) is 21 years of age or older; and

19 (3) was unmarried as of the date of acceptance

20 of the alien’s parent for resettlement under the Or21 derly Departure Program or through the United

22 States Consulate General in Ho Chi Minh City.

23 (c) QUALIFIED NATIONAL.—The term ‘‘qualified na24 tional’’ in subsection (b)(1) means a national of Vietnam

25 who—
3

HR 1840 RFS

1 (1)(A) was formerly interned in a re-education

2 camp in Vietnam by the Government of the Socialist

3 Republic of Vietnam; or

4 (B) is the widow or widower of an individual

5 described in subparagraph (A);

6 (2)(A) qualified for refugee processing under

7 the Orderly Departure Program re-education sub8 program; and

9 (B) is or was accepted under the Orderly De10 parture Program or through the United States Con11 sulate General in Ho Chi Minh City—

12 (i) for resettlement as a refugee; or

13 (ii) for admission to the United States as

14 an immediate relative immigrant; and

15 (3)(A) is presently maintaining a residence in

16 the United States or whose surviving spouse is pres17 ently maintaining such a residence; or

18 (B) was approved for refugee resettlement or

19 immigrant visa processing and is awaiting departure

20 formalities from Vietnam or whose surviving spouse

21 is awaiting such departure formalities.

Passed the House of Representatives October 30,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023767
<NAME> HEALTHDESK CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,268,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,525,359
<PP&E>                                         972,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 619,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,897,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          375,187
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    836,172
<COMMON>                                    12,257,505
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,897,485
<SALES>                                         56,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,186
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,470,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,600,977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,601,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,601,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2005...... 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.7 7.5 7.1 6.5 2006...... 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 2007...... 8.3 8.6 8.3 8.5 8.5 7.6 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.0 2008...... 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.9 6.3 4.8 6.8 6.6 6.1 5.3 2009...... 4.8 5.0 4.2 5.2 5.2 3.6 5.8 5.6 5.4 4.5 2006: Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.8  Q3... 8.6 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.3 9.3 9.2 8.7 8.4  Q4... 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 7.5 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.1 2007: Q1... 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.7 8.9 8.1 9.2 9.1 8.8 8.4  Q2... 8.6 9.0 8.5 8.9 8.7 7.9 9.2 9.1 8.9 8.4  Q3... 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.4 7.7 9.1 9.2 8.8 8.1  Q4... 7.7 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.1 6.9 8.6 8.5 8.3 7.4 2008: Q1... 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.8 7.1 5.8 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q2... 5.7 5.5 5.8 6.1 5.9 4.9 6.7 6.4 6.2 5.4  Q3... 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.5 6.3 4.7 6.6 6.6 6.1 4.9  Q4... 4.8 5.0 4.9 5.1 6.5 4.0 6.1 6.1 5.6 4.3 2009: Q1... 5.1 5.8 4.1 5.5 5.4 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.0  Q2... 4.7 5.3 4.4 5.0 6.0 3.6 5.9 5.6 5.3 4.3  Q3... 4.7 5.0 3.9 5.0 5.8 3.8 5.8 5.7 5.4 4.1  Q4... 4.5 4.4 4.7 5.0 4.4 3.4 5.9 5.7 5.5 4.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending May 21, 2022

----

Bank Holding Companies            Bank of Montreal, Montreal, Canada -- interagency notice of public meeting to be held virtually on July 14, 2022, on the proposal to acquire BancWest Holding Inc., and Bank of the West, both of San Francisco, California; and extension of the public comment period through July 19, 2022.            -Approved, May 16, 2022                        The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Toronto, Ontario, Canada -- interagency notice of public meeting to be held virtually on August 18, 2022, on the proposal to acquire First Horizon Corporation, Memphis, Tennessee; and extension of the public comment period through August 23, 2022.            -Approved, May 16, 2022            Personnel            Division of Research and Statistics -- appointment of Binoy Agarwal, Debbie Flores, Karen Krugman, and Chris Kurz as assistant directors and Byron Lutz and Raven Molloy as deputy associate directors.            -Announced, May 19, 2022            Regulations and Policies            Regulation J -- final rule that governs funds transfers over the Federal Reserve Banks' FedNow Service.            -Approved, May 16, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Eric Dickner

v.

NH Governor, et al.

No. 07-fp-120

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $5.00 is due no later than May 20,

2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income credited

to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New Hampshire State

Prison when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the

sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay the fee as ordered

will result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. In all

other respects plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis has been

granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-120-PB.

SO ORDERED.

______________________________

James R. Muirhead

'^2' -

^- Nk4

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 27, 2007

cc: Eric Dickner, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00120-PB Document 3 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending November 17, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNEW HAMPSHIRE MUTUAL BANCORP                                                                                            * 3A1New Hampshire Mutual Bancorp, Manchester, New Hampshire to become a mutual holding company through the acquisition of Meredith Village Savings Bank, Meredith, New Hampshire, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/14/2012NEW HAMPSHIRE MUTUAL BANCORP                                                                                            * 3A5
H. Res. 963 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 14, 2008. 

Whereas February 11–15, 2008, has been designated by the 

President as National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans 

Week; 

Whereas the National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans week 

each year is an opportunity to thank a special group of 

men and women, the more than 98,000 veterans of the 

United States Armed Forces, who are cared for every day 

in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, 

outpatient clinics, domicilaries, and nursing homes; 

Whereas at the 155 VA hospitals across the Nation, there are 

veterans who face the physical and mental wounds of 

combat every day, long after their military service has 

been completed; 

Whereas we can never fully repay our debt of gratitude to the 

veterans, but will thank and support them with our words 

and deeds; 

Whereas Mike Vogel, motion picture actor and star of the 

newly-released ‘‘Cloverfield’’, will lead the VA’s annual 

patient recognition program as the national spokesperson, inviting the public to visit and honor hospitalized 

veterans during National Salute to Hospitalized Veterans 

Week; and 
2 

•HRES 963 EH 

Whereas Mike Vogel will be the youngest celebrity to lead the 

National Salute, bringing youthful energy to the program 

at a time when the number of young combat veterans 

under the care of the VA is growing, and as the VA is 

looking to younger generations of Americans to replenish 

an aging volunteer force: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the National Salute to Hospitalized 

Veterans Program and its efforts to pay tribute to and 

express appreciation for hospitalized veterans, to increase community awareness of the role of VA medical 

centers, and to encourage citizens to visit hospitalized 

veterans and become involved as volunteers; 

(2) encourages citizens who live near a VA hospital 

or clinic to take time this week to visit and thank our 

veterans; and 

(3) will continue to work with veterans service organizations to support our veterans with words, actions, 

and financial assistance. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, May 1-5, 200Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,289,765 38,208 80,210 88,974 140,928 247,8Number of loans 19,578 7,046 5,380 2,661 2,103 1,6Weighted average maturity (months)1 13.83 10.61 11.62 12.86 16.70 12.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 2.88 2.46 3.55 4.21 4.62 3.7

Weighted average risk rating3 3.11 3.11 3.17 3.15 3.09 3.0

Weighted average interest rate4 7.95 8.79 8.75 8.64 8.40 8. Standard error5 .16 .11 .12 .06 .17 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 8.57 9.46 9.53 9.38 9.11 8. 25th percentile 7.45 8.16 8.03 7.98 7.71 7. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.26 8.69 8.70 8.38 8.17 8. Other livestock 8.12 8.96 8.74 8.38 8.27 7. Other current operating expenses7 8.28 8.78 8.78 8.72 8.59 8.

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.93 9.26 8.80 8.92 8.42 8. Farm real estate 7.86 9.35 8.21 8.33 7.89 8. Other8 7.45 8.31 8.56 8.38 8.06 7.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 86.17 80.58 79.09 75.95 79.80 75. Under commitment 87.22 89.15 87.92 80.98 85.13 81. Callable 19.31 26.80 33.11 30.48 33.98 35. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.62 3.73 6.21 7.74 7.20 11. Other livestock 7.32 3.71 6.14 6.33 8.60 8.7 Other current operating expenses7 35.72 80.54 69.70 55.92 51.59 46. Farm machinery and equipment 21.95 5.87 7.85 12.85 11.99 7. Farm real estate 2.21 .82 .83 1.07 2.11 3. Other8 27.19 5.33 9.27 16.09 18.51 22.0

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 7.04 2.73 7.39 5.13 10.63 5. Other 88.62 90.24 86.46 87.44 85.96 87. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
Order filed August 31, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-16-00203-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.R. AND I.R., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 326th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 8126-CX

O R D E R

In this accelerated parental-termination appeal, the mother filed a pro se notice 

of appeal and an affidavit of indigence in the district clerk’s office on July 25, 2016.

The mother has filed in this court a motion for court-appointed counsel. We abate 

the appeal. 

The record in this case indicates that the trial court determined that the mother 

was indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel. Sometime after counsel was 

appointed, the trial court found that the mother had “discharged that attorney” and 

that the mother was “not entitled to a second court-appointed attorney.” 

Consequently, the mother represented herself at trial. 
2

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(3), “a parent determined by the trial court 

to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the duration of the suit and any 

subsequent appeal.” Moreover, the appointment of an attorney ad litem to represent 

an indigent parent is mandatory in a suit filed by a governmental entity seeking 

termination of the parent-child relationship. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a)

(West ____). We note that the Texas Supreme Court has recently determined that 

the courts “have a duty to see that withdrawal of counsel will not result in foreseeable 

prejudice to the client” in a parental termination case. In re P.M., No. 15-0171, 2016 

WL 1274748, at *3 (Tex. Apr. 1, 2016). The court stressed the importance of 

counsel for the parents in such cases when it stated, “If a court of appeals allows an 

attorney to withdraw, it must provide for the appointment of new counsel to pursue 

a petition for review.” Id. The court also indicated that this court should abate an 

appeal and refer the case to the trial court for the appointment of new counsel when 

new counsel is necessary. Id. at *3 n.13

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and direct the trial court to appoint counsel 

for the mother on or before September 12, 2016. Immediately thereafter, the district 

clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record in this court containing any order 

entered by the trial court with respect to the appointment of counsel for the mother. 

At that time, the appeal will be reinstated. The mother’s appellate brief will be due 

to be filed in this court twenty days after reinstatement.1

The appeal is abated.

August 31, 2016 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.

 

1We note that this appeal is accelerated, and so far as reasonably possible, this court must ensure 

that the appeal is brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a).
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 953 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all Americans 

should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the service 

and sacrifice of members of the United States Armed Forces both at 

home and abroad. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. KNOLLENBERG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

all Americans should participate in a moment of silence 

to reflect upon the service and sacrifice of members 

of the United States Armed Forces both at home and 

abroad. 

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the 

Nation’s forefathers that the United States first gained 

freedom and became a sovereign nation; 

Whereas there are more than 1,500,000 active and reserve 

component members of the Armed Forces serving the 

Nation in support and defense of the values and freedom 

that all Americans cherish; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 953 IH 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and admiration of their fellow Americans 

for putting their lives in danger for the sake of the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around the globe and are playing a 

vital role in protecting the safety and security of all 

Americans; 

Whereas the Nation officially celebrates and honors the accomplishments and sacrifices of veterans, patriots, and 

leaders who fought for freedom, but does not yet officially 

pay tribute to those who currently serve in the Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas all Americans should participate in a moment of silence to support our troops; and 

Whereas March 26th, 2008, is designated as ‘‘National Support Our Troops Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that all Americans should participate in a mo3 ment of silence to reflect upon the service and sacrifice 

4 of members of the United States Armed Forces both at 

5 home and abroad. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS