alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 11

- 00680

- CV

ESTATE OF WALTER E. SNYDER, DECEASED

From the Probate Court No

. 2

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PC

- 3516

Honorable Tom Rickhoff , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 12, 2011

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant Celia L. Classen filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order all costs assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Otis Daniels

v. Case No. 08-cv-299-SM

NH State Prison, Warden

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 8, 2009, no objection having been filed, for the reasons

set forth therein. Plaintiff’s petition is hereby dismissed. 

SO ORDERED.

 

January 29, 2009 ___________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Otis Daniels, pro se 

Case 1:08-cv-00299-SM Document 7 Filed 01/29/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.7.4

This is a rider between Woodcotton Management INC. (landlord) and Sybari
software INC. (tenant) attached to the original lease.

         (1) Feb. 1st, 2003 to Dec. 31st, 2003 rent will be $7091.00 each month.

         Jan. 1st, 2004 to Dec. 31st, 2004 rent will be $7516.46 each month. (6%
increase)

         (2) Total proportion share for the purpose of this lease is deemed to
be 78%.

         (3) Downstairs office has a separate electric meter. Tenant shall pay
their own electric bill.

         (4) Tenant has the right to use south side of the basement as a storage
(33x54 S Q)




Woodcotton management INC.                   Sybari software INC.

/s/ Peter Tu      1/20/03                    /s/ James Shanahan  1/21/03
--------------------------                   -------------------------------
                  Date                                           Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      The Dress Barn Inc.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-25-1998
<CASH>                                         3032
<SECURITIES>                                   139994
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4201
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    102706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249933
<PP&E>                                         172109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 86399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 345129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          79521
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1225
<OTHER-SE>                                     264383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   345129
<SALES>                                        598175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598175
<CGS>                                          381354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  381354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6385)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                63350
<INCOME-TAX>                                   23123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            40227
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   40227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.70
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Electronics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, John Waldstein, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Waldstein                                 
|John Waldstein                                     
|President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
|Officer and Treasurer                              

Dated: November 27, 2006
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**June 2006**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: July 11, 2006**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-72-01-SM

Osuguwamen Ojo

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 29) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2007 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than July 26, 2007. On the filing of such waiver,

his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00072-SM Document 13 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: August 24, 2007 at 3:30 PM 

Jury Selection: September 5, 2007 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

July 23, 2007 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Terry Ollila, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00072-SM Document 13 Filed 07/23/07 Page 2 of 2
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1937

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in certain feasibility studies of water resource projects in the State of Washington.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1937

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in

certain feasibility studies of water resource projects in

the State of Washington.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1937 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Northwest Fea3 sibility Studies Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may

6 engage in the following feasibility studies:

7 (1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasi8 bility Study, to identify ways to meet future domes9 tic and commercial water distribution needs of the

10 Tulalip Indian Reservation on the Eastern Shore of

11 Puget Sound, Washington.

12 (2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water

13 Supply Feasibility Study, to identify additional rural

14 water supply sources for the Lower Elwha Indian

15 Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.

16 (3) The Makah Community Water Source

17 Project Feasibility Study, to identify ways to meet

18 the current and future domestic and commercial

19 water supply and distribution needs of the Makah

20 Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.

21 (b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS.—The Sec22 retary of the Interior shall make available to the public,

23 upon request, the results of each feasibility study author24 ized under subsection (a), and shall promptly publish in
3

•HR 1937 EH

1 the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those

2 results.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending September 28, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF LONG BEACH                                                                                * BranchFarmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, Long Beach, California, to establish a branch facility to be located at 9001 Firestone Boulevard, Downey, California.Newspaper: 09/26/2013Federal Register: Not applicableFARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF LONG BEACH                                                                                * BranchFarmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, Long Beach, California, to establish a branch facility to be located at 2421 East Coast Highway, Corona Del Mar, California.Newspaper: 09/28/2013Federal Register: Not applicable
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending June 14, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION                                                                                              CIC2009 Smith Irrevocable Trust, sole trustee John Kevin King, Richmond, Virginia, to acquire up to 13.12% of voting securities of First National Corporation, Strasburg, Virginia.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 06/25/2014INDEPENDENCE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                           CICHageman 2013 Grantor Trust, c/o J. Hope O. Hageman, sole trustee, to acquire up to 2.39% of the outstanding voting securities of Independence Bancshares, Inc., Greenville, South Carolina, through the transfer of shares from Alvin G. Hageman.Newspaper: 07/01/2014Federal Register: 06/25/2014
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1941

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission with authority to order certain refunds of electric rates,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2001

Mr. OSE (for himself and Mr. HORN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission with authority to order

certain refunds of electric rates, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electric Refund Fair5 ness Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. WHOLESALE RATE REFUND AUTHORITY.

7 Section 206(b) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

8 824e(b)) is amended as follows:
2

•HR 1941 IH

1 (1) In the second sentence, strike ‘‘shall not be

2 earlier than the date 60 days after the filing of such

3 complaint nor later than 5 months after the expira4 tion of such 60-day period’’ and insert ‘‘shall be the

5 date of the filing of such complaint’’.

6 (2) In the third sentence, strike ‘‘shall not be

7 earlier than the date 60 days after the publication

8 by the Commission of notice of its intention to ini9 tiate such proceeding nor later than 5 months after

10 the expiration of such 60-day period’’ and insert

11 ‘‘shall be the date of publication by the Commission

12 of notice of its intention to initiate such proceeding’’.

13 (3) Beginning in the seventh sentence, strike

14 ‘‘through a date fifteen months after such refund ef15 fective date’’ and all that follows down through

16 ‘‘prior to the conclusion of the proceeding’’ and in17 sert ‘‘through the conclusion of the proceeding’’.

18 (4) In the last sentence, after ‘‘interest’’ insert

19 ‘‘and any penalties the Commission deems appro20 priate’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen S. Bartlett

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00358-JL

Mutual Pharmaceutical

Company, Inc.

PROCEDURAL ORDER

The parties shall jointly confer regarding whether this

court’s recent summary judgment ruling, see Bartlett v. Mutual

Pharm. Co., 2010 DNH 112, moots or otherwise resolves or

eliminates any of the issues in their pending motions, including

their motions challenging expert testimony (docs. no. 128 and

142), their motions in limine (docs. no. 185-186, 188-198, 200-

201, and 205), and Bartlett’s motion challenging the use of

former FDA officials as fact witnesses (doc. no. 168). By July

16, 2010, the parties shall jointly file with the court a list of

any such issues. The parties are reminded that the purpose of

this filing is to prevent unnecessary work, not to raise or argue

new issues. 

While the parties raised a number of new issues on

yesterday’s conference call, the deadline for summary judgment

motions passed long ago (see doc. no. 98). The court will not

accept any further motions for summary judgment. Trial remains

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 244 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 2
scheduled to begin on August 16, 2010, and all other procedural

deadlines remain in effect.

The court will not conduct a pre-trial evidentiary hearing

on Mutual’s “comment k” defense, as requested by Bartlett on

yesterday’s conference call. Based on the evidence in the

current record, reasonable minds could differ as to whether the

defense applies, which means that it is a question for the jury. 

If Bartlett believes that the evidence at trial is insufficient

to support such a defense, then she may move (after the close of

evidence) to strike that defense from the case.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 14, 2010

cc: Keith M. Jensen, Esq.

Bryan Ballew, Esq.

Patrick J. O’Neal, Esq.

Christine M. Craig, Esq.

Eric Roberson, Esq.

Timothy P. Beaupre, Esq.

Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Esq.

Joseph P. Thomas, Esq.

Linda E. Maichl, Esq.

Paul J. Cosgrove, Esq.

Stephen J. Judge, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 244 Filed 07/14/10 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4258

___________

Michael L. Rehberg, and all other *

similarly situated employees; *

Keith W. Asleson; Theodore K. Hull, *

 *

Appellants, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Southern District of Iowa.

Iowa Department of Public Safety, *

sued as Department of Public Safety * [UNPUBLISHED]

and the State of Iowa, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 14, 1997 

 Filed: July 16, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael L. Rehberg, Keith W. Asleson, and Theodore K. Hull commenced this

action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1994) (FLSA),

against their employer--the Iowa Department of Public Safety (DOS) and the State of
The Honorable Celeste F. Bremer, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

-2-

Iowa--seeking overtime compensation. Upon defendants’ motion, the District Court1

dismissed the action. The court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction

under Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 116 S. Ct. 1114 (1996), as Iowa had not

consented to the suit; the Commerce Clause did not grant Congress the power to

abrogate Iowa’s Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit; and the FLSA was enacted

pursuant to the Commerce Clause. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that, although the FLSA

may have been passed pursuant to the Commerce Clause, Congress subsequently

passed an FLSA amendment abrogating the states’ immunity pursuant to Congress’s

enforcement power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Appellants’ argument is foreclosed by our recent decision in Raper v. Iowa, 115

F.3d 623, ____ (8th Cir. 1997). In Raper, we rejected the argument made by Iowa

employees who were seeking overtime compensation that Congress revoked the states’

Eleventh Amendment immunity from FLSA lawsuits under the Fourteenth Amendment,

because we concluded that the FLSA’s overtime provisions cannot be seen as serving

a Fourteenth Amendment purpose. See id. Accordingly, the judgment of the District

Court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2105 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2105

   To provide emergency market loss assistance for producers of red 
                 raspberries for the processed market.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2001

  Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself and Mr. Baird) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide emergency market loss assistance for producers of red 
                 raspberries for the processed market.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKET LOSS ASSISTANCE FOR PRODUCERS OF RED RASPBERRIES FOR 
              PROCESSED MARKET.

    (a) Provision of Assistance.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
use $15,000,000 of funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation to make 
payments to producers of the 2000 crop of red raspberries grown for the 
processed market to compensate such producers for loss of markets for 
processed red raspberries.
    (b) Payment Basis.--Subject to such other terms and conditions as 
the Secretary considers appropriate, a payment under this section shall 
be made on the basis of the quantity of the 2000 crop of red 
raspberries that was produced on a farm unit and marketed for 
processing.
    (c) Prevention of Duplicative Payments.--The Secretary shall take 
such actions as are necessary to ensure that payments made under this 
section do not duplicate payments provided under other Federal programs 
for the same loss, other than an indemnity provided under a policy or 
plan of insurance offered under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    (d) Emergency Designation.--The entire amount necessary to carry 
out this section shall be available only to the extent that an official 
budget request for the entire amount, that includes designation of the 
entire amount of the request as an emergency requirement as defined in 
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, is 
transmitted by the President to the Congress. The entire amount is 
designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to 
section 251(b)(2)(A) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.44


Letterhead of Venture Vest Capital Corporation

March 18, 2004


Great Oak, LLC

c/o CB Richard Ellis/Asset Services
Attn:  Debbie Santano, CPM/Director
3110 Fairview Park Drive - Suite 120

Falls Church, VA 22042

Dear Ms. Santano:

         This  letter will  constitute  an  amendment  and  termination  of that
certain Deed of Lease dated June 5, 2000 between Fair Grove Properties,  L.L.C.,
as  Landlord,   and  Qorus.com,   Inc.,  as  Tenant.  We  are  relying  on  your
representation  that Great Oaks,  LLC  ("Great  Oak") has  succeeded  Fair Grove
Properties, L.L.C. as Landlord under said Deed of Lease.

         In  consideration  of the payment to Great Oak of the sum of $1,500.00,
which sum is enclosed herewith,  and the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged
by Great  Oak,  Great  Oak and  Tenant  hereby  agree  that the Deed of Lease is
terminated as of the date hereof and shall be of no further force or effect from
or after the date hereof. In addition,  Great Oak and Tenant each further agrees
that neither Great Oak nor Tenant shall have further  obligations or liabilities
whatsoever  to the other under the Deed of Lease from and after the date hereof,
regardless of whether any such liability or obligation is alleged to have arisen
under  the Deed of Lease  before  or after  the  date  hereof,  and each  hereby
releases  and  forever  discharges  the other from any and all  obligations  and
liabilities  whatsoever  arising  under  or  pursuant  to  the  Deed  of  Lease,
regardless of when any such obligation or liability is deemed or alleged to have
arisen. In furtherance thereof,  Great Oak and Tenant each further agrees not to
sue or bring any other legal proceeding  against the other for any claims of any
nature  whatsoever based on or arising under the Deed of Lease, and each further
agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other from any and all costs,  losses,
expenses  (including  reasonable  fees of counsel),  damages or  liabilities  if
either breaches its agreements set forth in this letter.

          If the foregoing  correctly  sets forth our  agreements  regarding the
amendment and termination of the Deed of Lease,  we would  sincerely  appreciate
your so  acknowledging  and  agreeing  by signing one copy of this letter in the
space provided below and returning such signed copy to the  undersigned  for the
permanent records of the Tenant.

/s/ Philip E. Ray

Great Oak, LLC, Successor to Fair Grover Properties, L.L.C.,
as Landlord under the Deed of Lease noted above

By:        /s/ Stephen W. Gilbert
Name:      Stephen W. Gilbert
Title:     Portfolio Manager