31

C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Coll

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower 

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2000: Q2... 23 45 32 35 54 11 31 66 3 5 60 35 0  Q3... 19 56 25 28 61 10 26 70 3 4 69 27 0  Q4... 20 54 26 21 66 13 27 65 8 7 68 25 1 2001: Q1... 17 48 35 18 64 18 37 58 5 4 61 35 0  Q2... 23 48 29 13 65 22 31 65 4 4 60 36 0  Q3... 28 54 18 8 57 35 21 72 7 8 70 22 1  Q4... 23 52 24 6 60 34 33 59 8 7 59 34 0 2002: Q1... 19 55 27 10 62 28 38 57 4 6 55 39 0  Q2... 21 52 26 7 66 27 32 65 3 4 65 31 0  Q3... 25 51 24 8 61 31 30 64 6 6 64 30 1 

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2000: Q2... 11 66 23 30 62 8 19 75 6 6 80 14 1  Q3... 16 64 20 25 65 10 20 76 4 4 79 17 1  Q4... 16 61 22 21 68 11 25 68 7 4 73 24 0 2001: Q1... 12 63 25 12 71 17 25 71 4 4 70 26 0  Q2... 14 62 25 17 65 17 26 72 2 2 76 22 1  Q3... 19 63 18 11 61 28 21 76 3 4 78 19 0  Q4... 21 61 19 9 63 27 24 70 6 6 73 21 1 2002: Q1... 19 63 18 8 69 24 30 67 4 4 71 25 0  Q2... 15 60 25 11 73 16 34 64 2 3 63 34 0  Q3... 18 58 24 10 72 18 40 57 4 2 59 39 0 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2000: Q2... 18 63 19 14 72 14 12 71 17 13 73 13 2  Q3... 23 51 26 17 71 13 22 65 13 12 64 24 1  Q4... 21 49 30 13 72 15 27 64 10 13 59 28 2 2001: Q1... 17 54 29 8 74 17 30 61 9 7 62 31 1  Q2... 22 55 23 10 69 21 26 66 7 8 62 31 0  Q3... 27 55 18 10 68 22 18 77 5 8 75 17 0  Q4... 24 58 18 8 69 23 28 61 11 7 68 25 1 2002: Q1... 25 60 16 9 72 20 24 70 6 8 68 25 0  Q2... 35 54 11 6 72 22 25 70 5 8 69 23 0  Q3... 24 61 15 10 71 19 22 72 7 8 73 18 0 
32

C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year Earlier (continued)Percent

Demand for loans Funds availability Loan repayment rate Renewals or extensions Coll

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2000: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 27 61 13 18 62 19 14 67 19 1  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. 39 56 5 20 72 8 5 69 25 0  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. 16 68 15 9 69 22 11 78 11 1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 69 21 25 58 18 6 76 18 0  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 14 62 24 15 72 12 6 71 23 2  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. 13 58 30 15 77 8 13 76 11 0  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. 3 49 49 17 74 9 3 79 18 0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. 27 73 0 6 55 39 35 59 6 25  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. 10 72 19 33 64 4 2 60 38 0  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. 8 77 15 33 62 6 3 66 31 0 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2000: Q2... 22 68 11 19 69 11 22 73 5 0 78 22 0  Q3... 34 60 6 9 80 11 6 83 11 11 80 9 0  Q4... 21 75 4 4 92 4 13 79 8 9 87 4 0 2001: Q1... 19 58 23 0 85 15 15 81 4 0 92 8 0  Q2... 24 70 6 3 76 21 15 85 0 6 82 12 0  Q3... 40 56 4 0 56 44 4 92 4 8 84 8 4  Q4... 29 61 11 4 64 32 11 86 4 7 79 14 0 2002: Q1... 23 73 3 7 63 30 7 93 0 0 97 3 0  Q2... 30 60 10 10 67 23 10 90 0 3 93 3 3  Q3... 41 52 7 19 59 22 30 70 0 11 70 19 11  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.