alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                       1,496,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               68,156,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,447,072
<INVENTORY>                                 69,544,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           137,567,956
<PP&E>                                      15,204,755
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,885,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,537,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,519,245
<BONDS>                                     38,556,717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,122
<OTHER-SE>                                  75,395,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,537,145
<SALES>                                    379,238,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           379,238,562
<CGS>                                      299,998,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              299,998,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,097,338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,837,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,370,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,528,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,841,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                142,445
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,698,786
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-41065 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CONCEPTION TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-98-CR-15-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent

Conception Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Torres has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Date: May 14, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: Robert R. Keech

E.C.R./Reporter: Therese Lindblom

Probation: Justine Kozak

Interpreter: Marcela Salazar

Criminal Case No: 11-cr-00345-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. JUAN FRANCISCO-MIGUEL, a/k/a

Juan Thomas a/k/a Juan Andres

Francisco, a/k/a Jesse Martinez,

Defendant.

Counsel:

Hayley E. Reynolds

Matthew C. Golla

SENTENCING

11:22 a.m. Court in Session - Defendant present (in-custody)

Change of Plea Hearing - Tuesday, January 31, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

Plea of Guilty - one-count Indictment

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL.

Interpreter sworn (Spanish).

Court’s opening remarks.

11:26 a.m. Statement on behalf of Defendant (Mr. Golla).

11:30 a.m. Statement on behalf of Government (Ms. Alves).

11:33 a.m. Statement by Defendant on his own behalf (Mr. Francisco-Miguel).

Case 1:11-cr-00345-WYD Document 31 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

Court makes findings.

ORDERED: Government’s Motion for 1-Level Variance in Defendant’s Offense Level for

Acceptance of Appellate Waiver (ECF Doc. No. 21), filed March 13, 2012, is

GRANTED.

ORDERED: Government’s Motion for Decrease for Acceptance of Responsibility (ECF Doc.

No. 29), filed May 11, 2012, is GRANTED.

Order is APPROVED BY THE COURT.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion for Variance from the Advisory Sentencing Guidelines (ECF

Doc. No. 26), filed April 26, 2012, is DENIED.

ORDERED: Defendant be imprisoned for 51 months.

ORDERED: No term of supervised release is imposed. The defendant is advised that if he

enters or remains in the United States illegally, possesses a firearm or illegally

possess a controlled substance, he may be subject to further federal prosecution.

ORDERED: Defendant shall pay $100.00 to Crime Victim Fund (Special Assessment) to be

paid immediately.

ORDERED: No fine is imposed because defendant has no ability to pay a fine, cost of

incarceration or supervision.

ORDERED: Defendant advised of right to appeal the sentence imposed by the Court. Any

notice of appeal must be filed within fourteen (14) days. Defendant advised of

right to appeal in forma pauperis.

Court RECOMMENDS that the Bureau of Prisons place the defendant at the least

restrictive facility within the state of Colorado, so Defendant can be close to his family.

ORDERED: Defendant is REMANDED to the custody of the U.S. Marshal.

11:44 a.m. Court in Recess - HEARING CONCLUDED.

TOTAL TIME: :23

Case 1:11-cr-00345-WYD Document 31 Filed 05/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
exv10w1



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

CONSULTING AGREEMENT




     This, the First Amendment to that Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”)
between Edward L. Moses and Horizon Offshore Contractors, Inc., entered into
the 3rd day of December, 2003, is entered into by and between the parties
effective the 1st day of April, 2004.



     For the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties do
hereby agree as follows:



     1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms shall have the
meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.



     2. Section 1 (a) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:



          (a) Consultant shall perform services as directed by Company with respect
to liaison with senior management of Pemex Exploracion y Produccion (“Pemex”)
on collection of claims of the Company’s affiliate against Pemex (“Pemex
claims”), liaison with Galva, S.A., and the Company’s attorneys with respect to
arbitration of the Pemex claims, assisting in promotion of the Company and its
affiliates in Mexico, establishment of an office facility acceptable to Company
in its sole discretion for the Company’s affiliate in Mexico City, conducting a
search for and presenting to the Company a candidate to represent the Company
in Mexico and such other services as the Company may elect from time to time
and the Consultant agrees to so serve for such periods of time as the Company
may designate commencing on the date hereof and continuing on a day-to-day
basis thereafter. The Consultant agrees to perform services regarding such
matters and at such times as will be referred to him by the Company (the
“Services”).



     3. Section 1 (c) is amended by adding the following:



     In exchange for Consultant’s services and covenants hereunder, the Company
shall pay Consultant a fee of U.S. $125,000 for services rendered from May 1,
2004 to September 30, 2004. Company shall pay Consultant’s fee in equal monthly
installments on or before the last business day of each month. Consultant may
elect to defer any of such payments for services rendered between May 1, 2004
and September 30, 2004. If Consultant elects deferral, the amount of the
deferred payments shall be added to the next payment.



-1-









 





     4. Section 3 (a) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
following:



     The consultancy period shall terminate on September 30, 2004, unless
earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.



     5. Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and conditions of
the Agreement are unchanged and remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 
	
 

	 	
 
	Consultant

	 	Horizon Offshore Contractors, Inc.
	 
	 	 
	Date:

	 	Date:
	
 

	 	









-2-
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1959

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction from

gross income to individuals for expenses paid in using mass transit facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2001

Mr. BACA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

deduction from gross income to individuals for expenses

paid in using mass transit facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR EXPENSES FOR USE OF MASS

4 TRANSIT FACILITIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VII of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

7 additional itemized deductions for individuals) is amended

8 by redesignating section 222 as section 223 and by insert9 ing after section 221 the following new section:
2

•HR 1959 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 222. MASS TRANSIT EXPENSES.

2 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of an individual,

3 there shall be allowed as a deduction for the taxable year

4 an amount equal to the mass transit expenses paid by the

5 taxpayer during the taxable year.

6 ‘‘(b) MASS TRANSIT EXPENSES.—For purposes of

7 this section, the term ‘mass transit expenses’ means ex8 penses for transportation of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s

9 spouse, or any dependent of the taxpayer on mass transit

10 facilities (whether or not publicly owned). Such term shall

11 not include any expense reimbursed by an employer to the

12 extent such reimbursement is not includible in gross in13 come under section 132.’’

14 (b) DEDUCTION ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT INDI15 VIDUAL ITEMIZES OTHER DEDUCTIONS.—Subsection (a)

16 of section 62 of such Code is amended by inserting after

17 paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:

18 ‘‘(18) MASS TRANSIT EXPENSES.—The deduc19 tion allowed by section 222.’’

20 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

21 for part VII of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

22 is amended by striking the last item and inserting the fol23 lowing new items:

‘‘Sec. 222. Mass transit expenses.

‘‘Sec. 223. Cross reference.’’
3

•HR 1959 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 9, 2010

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard L. Duncan

v. Civil No. 08-cv-244-JL

Lakes Region Facility, Warden

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 26, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

July 2, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Richard L. Duncan, Pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00244-JL Document 12 Filed 07/02/09 Page 1 of 1
#### AMMAN v. SUR-WA STORES, Inc.

No. 4862.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1934.

Fink & Fink, of Monroe, for appellant

Munholland & Munholland, of Monroe, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit for a monied judgment in the amount of $150.

Defendant, in answer, admitted it owed .plaintiff the sum of $95.80'.

Judgment was rendered below for the amount sued for, and defendant has perfected an appeal to this court.

Appellee has filed in this court a plea to the jurisdiction ratione materise. It is certain *783from the pleadings in this ease that the amount in dispute at the time of the trial below was less than $100, and was not a sufficient amount to give this court jurisdiction ratione materise. Louisiana Constitution of 1921, art. 7, § 29; West Monroe Hardware & Furniture Co. v. Munholland, 18 La. App. 255, 138 So. 195.

The plea to the jurisdiction ratione mate-rise is therefore sustained, and the appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Milacron Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge and belief, that: 1.) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2004. Date: June 28, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronald D. BrownRonald D. BrownChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 28, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Robert P. LieneschRobert P. LieneschSenior Vice President  Finance, Controller and Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other
purpose and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certificate will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
*Release Date: December 31, 2009*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans
Percent
```

| Quarter | Other operating loans1 | Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
||
| 8.7     | 8.6                    | 8.2                                |
| 8.2     | 8.1                    | 7.6                                |
| 6.9     | 7.0                    | 6.6                                |
| 6.6     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.7     | 6.8                    | 6.5                                |
| 6.2     | 6.4                    | 6.1                                |
| 6.0     | 6.1                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.0     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
| 6.1     | 6.2                    | 5.9                                |
||
| 9.0     | 8.7                    | 8.1                                |
| 8.5     | 8.2                    | 7.7                                |
| 7.4     | 7.2                    | 6.7                                |
| 7.1     | 6.9                    | 6.6                                |
| 7.0     | 6.9                    | 6.5                                |
| 6.7     | 6.7                    | 6.4                                |
| 6.5     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.6     | 6.5                    | 6.2                                |
| 6.6     | 6.6                    | 6.2                                |
||
| 9.1     | 8.9                    | 8.8                                |
| 8.3     | 8.4                    | 8.4                                |
| 7.5     | 7.6                    | 7.7                                |
| 6.6     | 6.8                    | 6.8                                |
| 6.8     | 7.3                    | 7.1                                |
| 5.5     | 5.9                    | 5.8                                |
| 5.7     | 6.1                    | 6.0                                |
| 5.9     | 6.5                    | 6.5                                |
| 5.9     | 6.5                    | 6.6                                |
```
1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses
and the care and feeding of livestock (including poultry). Return to table
   * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.
   n.a. Not available.
   Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at
commercial banks.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (4 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2005...... 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.7 7.5 7.1 6.5 2006...... 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 2003: Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Q4... 5.5 5.5 5.2 6.0 5.5 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 5.1 2005: Q1... 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.9 5.7 7.3 6.9 6.9 6.4  Q2... 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.0 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q3... 6.7 6.9 6.8 7.1 6.9 5.8 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.3  Q4... 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7 6.7 8.3 8.1 7.7 7.1 2006: Q1... 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 7.3 8.5 8.5 8.2 7.8  Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.8  Q3... 8.6 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.3 9.3 9.2 8.7 8.4  Q4... 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 7.5 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Benjamin and

DLC Services Corp.,

Plaintiffs

v. Civil No. 08-cv-422-SM

Riley, More & More Enterprises, LLC,

176 Webster Street, LLC,

Linda Haytayan, Vatche Manoukian,

New England All Star Consulting, LLC,

and Mile High Real Estate, LLC,,

Defendants

O R D E R

A pretrial conference was held on December 16, 2008.

The pending motion to dismiss (filed before venue was

transferred) is denied without prejudice to renewing. See

documents 36 and 43 (order transferring venue but leaving motion

to dismiss as pending).

The parties will file a discovery plan in accordance with

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before January 15, 2009.

Plaintiffs will identify and serve “John and Jane Doe” and

“ABC, Inc.” defendants by June 17, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

December 18, 2008

cc: Jay J. Friedrich, Esq.

Christopher J. Pyles, Esq.

Jeffrey A. Zall, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00422-SM Document 60 Filed 12/18/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AND 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
Report), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Denise Hawkins, as Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)    the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange
           Act of 1934; and

(2)    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
           condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 12, 2003

/s/ Denise Hawkins 
Denise Hawkins
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  November 12, 2003

This certification
accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending February 3, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodEQUITY BANK                                                                                                             * 18C