UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

NUVEEN BALANCED MUN. & STOCK FUND, 

et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., 

Defendants. 

AGREED ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL AGAINST DEFENDANT 

FRANK E. WALSH, JR. AND BAR ORDER 

Plaintiffs Nuveen Conservative Allocation Fund (formerly Nuveen Balanced Municipal 

and Stock Fund), Nuveen Moderate Allocation Fund (formerly Nuveen Balanced Stock and 

Bond Fund), Nuveen Multi-Manager Large-Cap Value Fund (formerly Nuveen Large-Cap Value 

Fund) and the Nuveen Santa Barbara Dividend Growth Fund (formerly the Nuveen Rittenhouse 

Growth Fund) (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Frank E. Walsh, Jr. (“Walsh”) (each of them a 

“Settling Party” and collectively, the “Settling Parties”), having represented to the Court that 

they have entered into a settlement agreement that resolves all issues between and among them 

in the Complaint, and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS: 

1. Pursuant to Section 21D(f)(7)(A) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 

of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7)(A): (a) defendants L. Dennis Kozlowski and Mark H. Swartz 

(collectively, the “Non-Settling Defendants”), and Tyco International Ltd., Covidien Ltd., and 

Tyco Electronics Ltd. (the “Previously-Settled Defendants,” together with the Non-Settling 

Defendants the “Non-Released Parties”), and each of them, are hereby permanently barred, 

enjoined, and restrained from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any claim for or otherwise 

seeking contribution against any Settling Party based upon, relating to, or arising out of the 

846826.1 

08-CV-01338-PB 

MDL 1335 

Case 1:08-cv-01338-PB Document 18 Filed 01/06/10 Page 1 of 3
subject matter, allegations, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions 

alleged, involved, set forth or referred to in the Complaint in this suit; and (b) except as provided 

in paragraph 6 of the accompanying Settlement Agreement and Release, each Settling Party is 

hereby permanently barred, enjoined, and restrained from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting 

any claim for or otherwise seeking contribution for any amount paid in connection with this 

action against any other person based upon, relating to, or arising out of the subject matter, 

allegations, transactions, facts, matters, occurrences, representations or omissions alleged, 

involved, set forth or referred to in the Complaint in the suit. 

2. Because there is no just reason for the delaying the entry of a final judgment with 

respect to the claims asserted by Plaintiffs against Walsh, all claims asserted by Plaintiffs against 

Walsh in the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 54(b). This action is not dismissed with respect to any claims against the Non-Settling 

Defendants. 

3. The Clerk is directed to enter this Agreed Order and Final Judgment of Dismissal 

against Defendant Frank E. Walsh, Jr. and Bar Order as a final judgment and send a copy of 

same to all counsel of record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Enter: / /2010 

The Hon. Paul Barbadoro 

United States District Judge 

846826 1 2 

Case 1:08-cv-01338-PB Document 18 Filed 01/06/10 Page 2 of 3
We ask for this: 

/s/ Daniel P. Chiplock, Esq. for 

Laurence Greenwald, Esq. 

Michele L. Pahmer, Esq. 

Stroock Stroock & Lavan LLP 

180 Maiden Lane 

New York, NY 10038 

Counsel for Defendant Frank E. Walsh, Jr. 

/s/ Daniel P. Chiplock, Esq. 

Steven E. Fineman, Esq. 

Daniel P. Chiplock, Esq. 

Michael Miarmi, Esq. 

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 

250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor 

New York, NY 10013 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

846826 1 3 

Case 1:08-cv-01338-PB Document 18 Filed 01/06/10 Page 3 of 3