alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Dress Barn, Inc. (“the Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”), I, Armand Correia,
      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the
      provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended
      to be used for any other purpose.




/s/
                Armand CorreiaArmand
                CorreiaSenior
                Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember
                24, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
1ST QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   38
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        72,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                          2,012
<INVENTORY>                                         239,814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    316,684
<PP&E>                                               39,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                       15,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      377,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               254,854
<BONDS>                                              10,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                132
<OTHER-SE>                                          110,146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        377,571
<SALES>                                             185,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    185,935
<CGS>                                               156,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       156,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     24,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    2,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,477
<INCOME-TAX>                                            601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     876
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            871
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.07



</TABLE>
In the Senate of the United States,

September 6, 2001.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 1885) entitled ‘‘An Act to expand the class of

beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of status under

section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline for classification petition and labor certification filings, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the

following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Section 245(i) Extension

3 Act of 2001’’.
2

HR 1885 EAS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245(i)(1) of the Immigra3 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)) is

4 amended—

5 (1) in subparagraph (B)—

6 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘on or before

7 April 30, 2001; or’’ and inserting ‘‘on or before

8 the earlier of April 30, 2002, and the date that

9 is 120 days after the date on which the Attorney

10 General first promulgates final or interim final

11 regulations to carry out the Section 245(i) Ex12 tension Act of 2001; or’’; and

13 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘on or before

14 such date; and’’ and inserting ‘‘on or before the

15 earlier date described in clause (i);’’;

16 (2) in subparagraph (C), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the

17 end; and

18 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the fol19 lowing:

20 ‘‘(D) who, in the case of a beneficiary of a peti21 tion for classification, or an application for labor cer22 tification, described in subparagraph (B) that was

23 filed after April 30, 2001, demonstrates that the fa24 milial relationship existed before August 15, 2001, or

25 the application for labor certification that is the basis
3

HR 1885 EAS

1 of such petition for classification was filed before Au2 gust 15, 2001;’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by sub4 section (a) shall take effect as if included in the enactment

5 of the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (114 Stat.

6 2762A–345), as enacted into law by section 1(a)(2) of Pub7 lic Law 106–553.

Attest:

Secretary.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885

AMENDMENT
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of BPZEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Randall D. Keys, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Randall D. Keys*   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Randall D. Keys         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| January 17, 2006   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Meditech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Gerald
N. Kern, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.





By:  /s/  GERALD N. KERN
   -------------------------------
          GERALD N. KERN
          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


September 11, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DORIAN KYLE SERMON,

 Appellant,

v.

MARISOL HERNANDEZ,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00071-CV

Appeal from the

383rd District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#2018DCM0750) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
|   | · | the      annual cash retainer payable for Company Board-level (as opposed to      Committee-level) service will be$27,000; |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      annual cash retainer payable to the chairman of the Audit Committee will      be $10,800; |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      annual cash retainer payable to the chairman of the Compensation Committee      will be $8,100; |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      annual cash compensation payable to the chairman of the Corporate      Governance Committee will be $6,300;and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the      annual cash retainer payable to the Lead Independent Director will be      $10,800. |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | for      in-person Board of Directors meetings,$1,440; |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | for      in-person Committee meetings, $1,080;and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | for      telephonic meetings of the Board of Directors or a Committee lasting less      than one hour, an amount equal to 50% of the per meeting for a Board of      Directors or Committee meeting, as applicable;  and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | on      and after February 1, 2010, the Chairman of the Joint Special Committee      shall be paid additional compensation at the rate of $150 per hour in      recognition of his increased responsibilities in connection with the      search for a new chief executiveofficer. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-164-01/02/03-SM

Juan Galan, et al.,

 Defendants

O R D E R

Defendant Galan’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

15). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of May 2009. Defendant Galan

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than March 19, 2009. On the

filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 16 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for May 8, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on May 19, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 5, 2009

cc: John Kacavas, Esq.

Daniel Lustenberger, Esq.

Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 16 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 2
#### East Harlem Management Group, Inc., Appellant, v Mary Ann Phipps Silbermann, Respondent, et al., Defendants. Mary Ann Phipps Silbermann et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Seymour Schorr et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants. (And Another Action.)

[807 NYS2d 69]

*362Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2005, after a nonjury trial, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, dismissing plaintiffs complaint in action No. 1 except insofar as it alleges conversion of personal property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the trial court found, the certifications issued exclusively to defendant’s decedent, Dr. Silbermann, examined within the applicable statutory and regulatory framework, compel the conclusion that when he decided to terminate his relationship with appellants in 1997, he alone, as the sole certificate holder of The Eugene Silbermann, M.D., Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program, had the right to continue operating the subject methadone program, and to do so out of the premises from which it was authorized to operate and without disruption of the personnel structure in place. To hold in favor of appellants on this issue of operational authority, i.e., to accept their inapt characterization of themselves as the “owners” of the program, would, as the trial court concluded, effectively nullify the entire regulatory scheme governing the lawful distribution of methadone (Mental Hygiene Law art 32, former art 23). Indeed, appellants concede that they received no authorization from the relevant authorities to operate the program, and provided no written disclosure of any equity interest therein *(see*Mental Hygiene Law former § 23.01 [a]; § 23.07 [a] [3], [4], [5]; [b] [4]). While “ ‘[t]he violation of a statute that is merely malum prohibitum will not necessarily render a contract illegal and unenforceable’ ” *(Chirra v Bommareddy,*22 AD3d 223, 224 [2005]), the only pertinent contract disclosed in this record is that found by the trial court, namely, an oral, at-will management contract between Dr. Silbermann and plaintiff East Harlem Management Group, Inc., under which the latter, acting as the former’s agent, provided administrative services to the program. In this regard, the evidence shows, inter alia, that the program’s employees were paid exclusively with funds that were generated by the program and deposited into a bank account controlled by Dr. Silbermann. Quite apart from the regulatory framework, plaintiffs issuance of W-2 forms and payroll checks was entirely consistent with its role as a management company. We have considered appellants’ other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2006: Q4... 18 47 35 27 66 7 15 78 7 9 53 38 17 40 

2007: Q1... 10 51 38 23 68 8 13 79 8 5 51 45 9 42  Q2... 10 59 30 23 71 6 12 79 8 8 48 44 11 55  Q3... 15 50 35 16 72 12 9 86 5 5 58 37 13 46  Q4... 16 42 41 27 67 6 9 80 11 5 62 33 18 32 2008: Q1... 20 46 34 41 55 4 17 77 6 8 59 33 19 35  Q2... 26 49 25 45 52 3 22 72 6 10 56 34 26 36  Q3... 18 37 45 31 64 4 19 76 5 13 67 20 8 35  Q4... 16 41 43 28 72 1 13 77 10 19 67 14 7 30 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2006: Q4... 14 66 20 26 63 11 10 80 5 10 85 6 11 66 

2007: Q1... 13 64 24 18 72 10 12 77 5 12 81 7 7 65  Q2... 8 66 26 16 74 10 17 75 2 13 80 7 7 69  Q3... 10 72 18 15 75 10 11 80 3 8 75 18 7 69  Q4... 11 63 26 16 71 13 7 90 3 8 76 16 8 64 2008: Q1... 22 57 21 29 65 6 11 86 4 17 76 7 19 55  Q2... 21 56 23 40 53 8 13 85 2 8 78 14 15 51  Q3... 15 71 15 31 65 4 11 89 0 13 74 13 11 58  Q4... 38 52 10 47 48 5 19 69 6 23 71 6 22 52 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2006: Q4... 25 70 5 18 76 6 24 76 0 16 68 16 25 70 

2007: Q1... 26 58 16 20 67 13 21 64 14 44 50 6 21 58  Q2... 12 88 0 6 94 0 13 88 0 11 78 11 11 84  Q3... 36 64 0 18 82 0 20 80 0 8 58 33 21 71  Q4... 39 56 6 33 67 0 31 69 0 24 76 0 17 61 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.  Q2... 25 56 19 20 73 7 21 71 7 19 56 25 13 75  Q3... 60 33 7 36 64 0 46 54 0 29 64 7 40 47  Q4... 56 38 6 43 57 0 50 50 0 36 50 14 50 38  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul
Durando, Chief financial Officer of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp., certify that:

The Form 10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the
period ended February 28, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the periods presented.



/s/ Paul DurandoPaul DurandoVice President, FinanceDate: May 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to Nu Horizons
Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND PLACE:

 Tuesday, September 30, 2008 at 1 p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEM:

 PEFCO Secured Note Issues Resolutions.

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

 The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone 202-565-3336).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. E8-22665 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-19-PB

Anthony Seward

O R D E R

Defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea contains no

new information that causes me to question my prior determination

that he acted knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently when he

entered his guilty plea. Defendant’s contention that he should

be allowed to withdraw his plea because there is insufficient

evidence to support a conclusion that he possessed crack cocaine

with the intent to distribute is meritless. There is abundant

evidence in the record to support this element of the charge as

is evidenced by the government’s proffer when the guilty plea was

entered. There is also no basis in the record for any potential

claim that counsel provided ineffective assistance when he

advised the defendant to plead guilty. In short, there is no

fair and just reason for the defendant’s request to withdraw his

plea. 

Case 1:08-cr-00019-SM Document 62 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
The Motion to Withdraw Plea of Guilty and to Remove Counsel

(Doc. No. 60) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 5, 2010

cc: Michael Ramsdell, Esq.

Debra Walsh, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

2

Case 1:08-cr-00019-SM Document 62 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2
#### SOUTH SEAS HOTEL, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. D. Ward WHITE and Agnes L. White, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 24, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

 

Dated: March 23, 2005 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.