alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### NORMAND v. AVOYELLES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 6572.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1943.

A. J. Roy, C. A. Riddle, and W. K. Joffrion, all of Marksville, for appellant.

Earl Edwards, of Marksville, for ap-pellee.

HARDY, Judge.

In this case no appearance has been made before this Court on behalf of the appellant, either by oral argument or by brief, and it is therefore presumed that the appeal has been abandoned.

Accordingly, there is judgment dismissing the appeal, at appellant’s cost.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00356-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. MICKEY MARIE PALMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES AND DEADLINES

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter has been scheduled for a five-day jury trial on the docket of Judge

Philip A. Brimmer in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A701, 7th Floor, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on November 14, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. It is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by October 17, 2011 and

responses to these motions shall be filed by October 24, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall

be made no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any

challenges to such experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is

further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made

one week after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such

experts shall be made no later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is

further
2

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is set for November 10, 2011 at

1:00 p.m. in Courtroom A701. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in

person. 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial

Preparation Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED September 22, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending November 29, 2014FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
#### Solomon MOGES-HAILE, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-2455.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided Aug. 18, 2003.

David Goren, Law Office of David Goren, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Allen W. Hausman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Deborah N. Misir, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Solomon Moges-Haile, a native of what is now Eritrea and a citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”). The order affirmed, without opinion, the immigration judge’s decision and order denying Moges-Haile’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal and withholding of removal under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for review.

Moges-Haile claims the immigration judge erred in finding that he failed to present credible evidence in support of his asylum application. We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision, which was designated by the Board as the final agency determination, and find that substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s conclusion that Moges-Haile was not credible. As such, Moges-Haile failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution as necessary to qualify for relief from removal. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b) (2003).

Next, Moges-Haile claims his due process rights were violated because the Board affirmed the decision of the immigration judge without opinion, after review by a single Board member, in accordance with the procedure set out in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(7) (2003). We have reviewed Moges-Haile’s challenges to the Board’s use of this streamlined procedure and find them to be without merit. *See Georgis v. Ashcroft,*328 F.3d 962 (7th Cir.2003); *Mendoza v. United States Attorney Gen.,*327 F.3d 1283, 1288-89 (11th Cir.2003); *Soadjede v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 830, 832-33 (5th Cir.2003); *Gonzalez-Oropeza v. United States Attorney Gen.,*321 F.3d 1331, 1333-34 (11th Cir.2003); *Albathani v. INS,*318 F.3d 365, 375-79 (1st Cir.2003). We further find summary affirmance was appropriate in this case under the factors set forth in § 1003.1(a)(7).

Accordingly, we deny Moges-Haile’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 851 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 17, 2007.
Whereas on December 2 and 3, 2007, a storm with winds exceeding 120 miles per 
        hour struck Oregon and Washington, toppled trees, felled power lines, 
        and destroyed homes and businesses;
Whereas more than ten inches of rain fell in 24 hours, inundating parts of 
        Oregon and Washington, causing rivers to overflow, flooding homes, 
        schools, businesses, and roads;
Whereas the combination of hurricane-force winds and torrential rains caused 
        devastating damage that isolated towns, left citizens without housing, 
        transportation, communications, water, heat, or electricity;
Whereas local and State emergency personnel responded heroically and without 
        hesitation to aid in rescue, recovery, and assistance efforts;
Whereas the Oregon and Washington National Guard and the U.S. Coast Guard 
        rescued hundreds of individuals trapped in or on their homes by rising 
        water;
Whereas the people of Oregon and Washington rose to become extraordinary 
        citizens by helping each other, opening their homes, schools, churches, 
        and businesses to shelter their neighbors;
Whereas amateur radio operators performed vital communication duties in 
        assisting first responders;
Whereas the National Weather Service forecasts helped avert even greater 
        casualties and damage;
Whereas people have perished in the storm;
Whereas homes, businesses, schools, and roads have been closed;
Whereas many long-term effects of the storm are still unknown; and
Whereas thousands of people of the Pacific Northwest are without power, water, 
        or road access: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the citizens of the Pacific Northwest for their courage 
        in facing the storm and efforts in helping their neighbors in a time of 
        great need;
            (2) honors the National Weather Service, State and local police 
        officers, fire fighters, local rescue personnel, other first responders, 
        and amateur radio operators for their efforts in the face of the severe 
        storm;
            (3) extends its thoughts and prayers to those whose lives have been 
        devastated, and who have lost their housing, transportation, 
        communications, water, heat, or electricity; and
            (4) extends its profound and deepest sympathies to the families and 
        friends of those who perished.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending February 16, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodARVEST BANK                                                                                                             * BranchArvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 11207 South State Highway 51 inside the Wal-Mart Supercenter, Coweta, Oklahoma.Newspaper: 02/27/2008Federal Register: Not applicable
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) by Beverly Hills Bancorp Inc. (the Company), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | BEVERLY HILLS BANCORP INC.
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/    LARRY B. FAIGIN    
|                       |  |  |  | Larry B. Faigin           
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form
10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01761-RPM

CARLOS BASSATT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 IN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,

PATRICK SANCHEZ and

DENVER SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD AND SIXTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF IN SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

____________________________________________________________________________

Upon review of the second amended complaint, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the

second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth claims, filed October 18, 2011, the plaintiff’s opposition filed

November 18, 2011, and the defendants’ reply, filed December 5, 2011, it is

ORDERED that the third and sixth claims for relief asserting liability as to the Denver

School Board are duplicative of the claims against the School District No. 1 and on that basis it

is

ORDERED that the third and sixth claims for relief are dismissed, resulting in the

dismissal of Denver School Board as a defendant and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of the defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied.

DATED: December 9th , 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-01761-RPM-BNB Document 22 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 930 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 930

  Supporting the goals and ideals of ``Career and Technical Education 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

 Mr. Baird (for himself and Mr. English of Pennsylvania) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                               and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the goals and ideals of ``Career and Technical Education 
                                Month''.

Whereas there are over 15,000,000 secondary and postsecondary career and 
        technical education students in the United States;
Whereas nationwide, there are over 10,000 secondary high schools and career tech 
        centers and over 9,000 postsecondary institutions offering career and 
        technical education programs;
Whereas a competitive global economy requires workers trained in skilled 
        professions;
Whereas career and technical education plays a crucial role in preparing a well-
        educated and skilled workforce in America;
Whereas career and technical education prepares students for all of the 20 
        fastest occupations identified by the U.S. Department of Labor;
Whereas according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, nearly 75 percent of 
        employers report severe conditions when trying to hire qualified workers 
        and 40 percent say that applicants are poorly skilled;
Whereas students taking career and technical education courses have higher grade 
        point averages in college, are less likely to drop out in high school 
        and college, and have better employment and earnings outcomes than other 
        students;
Whereas, in 2006, Congress reauthorized with bipartisan support the Carl D. 
        Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which provides states with 
        Federal resources to support career and technical education programs; 
        and
Whereas the Association for Career and Technical Education has designated 
        February as ``Career and Technical Education Month'' to celebrate career 
        and technical education across the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Career and Technical 
        Education month;
            (2) recognizes the importance of career and technical 
        education in preparing a well-educated and skilled workforce in 
        America; and
            (3) encourages educators, counselors, and administrators to 
        promote career and technical education as an option to 
        students.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending February 2, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodPENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.                                                                                               * 3A5Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Williamsport, PA to acquire 100% of Luzerne National Bank Corporation, Luzerne, PA.Newspaper: 03/01/2013Federal Register: 02/28/2013
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 5 Filed 07/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 5 Filed 07/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 5 Filed 07/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 5 Filed 07/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 5 Filed 07/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Jerry E.
Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn


------------------------
Jerry E. Vaughn
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
#### DOUSSA v. DOUSSA.

No. 18299.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 29, 1945.

John D. Nix, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellant.

Bentley G. Byrnes, of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by George G. Doussa. against his brother, William Doussa, in which he claims that there is due him a balance of $232.50 as the remainder of the purchase price of $350, which his brother agreed to pay him for his interest in a partnership formerly existing between them, plus $30 due him on account of a deposit with the New Orleans Public Service on the gas and electric meters in the place of business.

There was judgment below dismissing-plaintiff’s demand as in case of non-suit and. he has appealed.

It appears that George and William Doussa were in business for sometime at 1424 Canal Street, in the City of New Orleans, and that for some reason George desired to dissolve the partnership. They could not agree upon terms and, in an effort to settle the matter amicably, met at the home of a mutual friend, Christopher Antonatos, where the matter was discussed, at some length. Antonatos testified in corroboration of the plaintiff except that he put the amount which William agreed to pay his brother, George, at $300, which was to be paid in small monthly payments of $10 each.

William Doussa, when first placed upon the stand by the plaintiff as on cross-examination, testified that he knew nothing of any agreement with George to pay him. anything. He admitted having paid small sums from time to time, totaling $117.50,. as claimed by plaintiff, but declared that this sum was paid as a gratuity to help his. *665brother out of financial difficulties. However, when testifying on his own behalf, he stated definitely that Antonatos was right in saying that he had agreed to pay $300 to his brother George for his interest in the business, but that he told his brother “I see first, I’ll let you know.”

We have, therefore, a claim by plaintiff of $350, which the only disinterested witness testified should be $300 and an eventual admission by defendant that $300 was agreed upon. The claim for the deposit of $30 is not disputed.

It will appear, therefore, that plaintiff’s claim should be recognized to the extent of $300 and a judgment rendered in his favor for that amount.plus the $30 deposit, less the payments made on account.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is annulled, avoided and reversed and it is now ordered that there be judgment herein in favor of the plaintiff, George Doussa, and against the defendant, William Doussa, in the sum of $212.50, together with legal interest from judicial demand until paid and all costs.

Reversed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02241-LTB-CBS

LUCIA VASCONCELLOS,

Plaintiff,

v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut Insurance

Company, and

GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF JPMORGAN CHASE

BANK, an ERISA Welfare Benefit Plan,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER 

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal

(Doc 36 - filed October 4, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is

therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to

pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: October 5, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02241-LTB-CBS Document 37 Filed 10/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
exv10w4



 





EXHIBIT 10.4




Description of Charter Communications

Long-Term Incentive Program




     The Long-Term Incentive Program “LTIP,” administered under the Charter
Communications, Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, offers two forms of long-term,
equity-based compensation – stock options and performance shares.



     Employees of Charter and its subsidiaries whose pay classifications exceed
a certain level are eligible to receive options to purchase shares of Class A
common stock of Charter Communications, Inc. Employees who are more senior are
eligible to receive stock options and performance shares.



     Employees eligible to receive performance shares receive awards of Charter
stock that are earned based on Charter’s performance against company
performance targets established by management and the Compensation Committee of
Charter’s Board of Directors. Performance is measured over a three-year period
referred to as a performance cycle. The number of performance shares an
employee earns at the end of a three-year performance cycle depends on
Charter’s performance in relation to the targets.



     Financial Performance measures will be calculated over a three-year period,
based on Revenue Growth and Unlevered Free Cash Flow. Revenue Growth is the
annual compound growth in our audited revenues excluding franchise fees.
Unlevered Free Cash Flow Growth is the annual compound growth in our Free Cash
Flow excluding the effects of our debt and equity capital structure. This is
calculated as Charter’s total revenues minus operating, selling, and general
and administrative expenses less capital expenditures.