alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending March 23, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBIG MAC BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                CICNotice submitted by Troy and Crystal Faulkender, Oakley, Kansas; Jay and Brandy Todd, Rexford, Kansas; Darvin and Tammi Strutt, Colby, Kansas; Sharon and Ronnie Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas; Crystal Ann Trauer, trustee of the Laurence Duane Trauer Tax Shelter Trust and the Crystal Ann Trauer Revocable Trust, both in Hays, Kansas; Nichole and Bret Tremblay, Manhattan, Kansas; Leslea and Brett Oelke, Hoxie, Kansas; Brittany Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas, Taylore Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas; Jerry and Melissa Spresser, Hoxie, Kansas; Larry and Julia Spresser, Pittsburg, Kansas; Brian and Sheri Baalman, Menlo, Kansas; and Samuel Brookover, Scott City, Kansas, as a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Big Mac Bancshares, Inc., Hoxie, Kansas, parent of Peoples State Bank, McDonald, Kansas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 03/25/2013FIRST NATIONAL BANK                                                                                                     MemberFirst National Bank, Independence, Kansas, (to be known as FirstBank of Independence) to retain its membership in the Federal Reserve System following its conversion from a national to a state charter.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableVISION BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                 CICNotice by the Bill and Twylah Horne Irrevocable Trust and Bill J. Horne, Jr., Ada, Oklahoma; Twylah Jenonne Kesler, Edmond, Oklahoma; and Jeanetta Bagwell, Ada, Oklahoma; as trustees and parties to the Vision Bancshares, Inc. Voting Agreement, to retain control of Vision Bancshares, Inc., parent of Vision Bank, National Association, both of Ada, Oklahoma.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 03/20/2013
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56810-56811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Unconventional Resources Technology Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Unconventional 
Resources Technology Advisory Committee. Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.

LOCATION: TMS, Inc., 955 L'Enfant Plaza, North, SW., Suite 1500, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena Melchert, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Oil and Natural Gas, Washington, DC 20585. Phone: 
202-586-5600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Unconventional 
Resources Technology Advisory Committee is to provide advice on 
development and implementation of programs related to onshore 
unconventional natural gas and other petroleum resources to the 
Secretary of Energy and provide comments and recommendations and 
priorities for the Department of Energy Annual Plan per requirements of 
the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Title IX, Subtitle J, Section 999.

    Tentative Agenda:

12:30 p.m.-1 p.m. Registration.
1 p.m.-2:45 p.m. Welcome and Roll Call; Opening Remarks by the 
Committee Chair; Report by the Editing Subcommittee; Facilitated 
discussion by the members regarding final report; Approval of Committee 
final report; and Preparations for the next meeting of the Committee.
2:45 p.m.-3 p.m. Public Comments.
3 p.m. Adjourn.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Designated Federal Officer and the Chairman of the Committee will lead 
the meeting for the orderly conduct of business. If you would like to 
file a written statement

[[Page 56811]]

with the Committee, you may do so either before or after the meeting. 
If you would like to make oral statements regarding any of the items on 
the agenda, you should contact Elena Melchert at the address or 
telephone number listed above. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least five business days prior to the meeting, and 
reasonable provisions will be made to include the presentation on the 
agenda. Public comment will follow the 5 minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days at the Freedom of Information Public 
Reading Room, Room 1G-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 24, 2008.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-22919 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MoneyLogix
Group, Inc. for the three month period ending June 30, 2009, I, Gary Cilevitz,
Chief Financial Officer of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.   Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ending June 30, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.   The
information contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of MoneyLogix Group,
Inc.
 
 Dated:
August 14, 2009
 
 MONEYLOGIX
      GROUP, INC.By:
                    /s/
      Gary CilevitzGary
      CilevitzChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 56540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22932]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 20

[PS Docket No. 07-114; DA 08-2129]


Wireless E911 Location Accuracy Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission sought comment on 
proposals in certain ex parte filings submitted by the Association of 
Public-Safety Communications Officials, International (APCO), the 
National Emergency Number Association (NENA), AT&T, Sprint Nextel 
Corporation, and Verizon Wireless regarding location accuracy 
requirements for wireless licensees subject to the Commission's rules 
that specify standards for wireless Enhanced 911 (E911) Phase II 
location accuracy and reliability. The proposed rule stated that 
``Comments are due October 6, 2008 by 12 p.m. Reply Comments are due 
October 14, 2008 by 12 p.m.'' Only Reply Comments are due by 12 p.m. 
Comments are due on October 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Beers, Chief, Policy 
Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-
0952.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of September 25, 2008, in FR Doc. E8-22645, 
on page 55473, in the first column, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: Comments are due October 6, 2008. Reply Comments are due October 
14, 2008 by 12 p.m.

Thomas J. Beers,
Division Chief, Policy, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8-22932 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJWINDER SINGH,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 70064

Agency No. A099

- 857

- 409

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12 , 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Rajwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigratio n Ap peals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider

.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reconsider or reopen

, Mohammed v. Gonzales , 400 F.3d 785,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 70064

791 (9th Cir. 2005), and w e deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse it s discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider

where Singh failed to identify a ny error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order

. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) (a motion to reconsider must specify error s of fact or law

in a prior decision); Ma v. Ashcroft , 361 F.3d 553, 558 (9th Cir. 2004) (discussing

the standard for a motion to reconsider).

In construing Singh’s motion as a motion to reopen, the BIA did not abuse

i ts discretion in denying it where Singh failed to dem onstrate that the new evidence

he submitted would likely have changed the outcome of his case. See Shin v.

Mukasey , 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Aliens who seek to remand or

reopen proceedings to pursue relief bear a ‘heavy burden’ of proving that, if

proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would likely change the result in the

case.” (citation omitted)).

We reject Singh’s contention that the BIA failed to construe his motion to

reconsider as a motion to reopen.

PETIT ION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02233-WYD-MJW

CBS OUTDOOR, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

800 LINCOLN LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Plaintiff CBS Outdoor, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File a Surreply in Opposition to

800 Lincoln's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 23), filed December 27,

2011, is GRANTED. The Court accepts Plaintiff's Surreply in Opposition to Motion for

Summary Judgment into the Court record.

Dated: December 30, 2011.

Case 1:11-cv-02233-WYD-MJW Document 24 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### VANDERBILT PARTS v. SCHACKAI.

No. 14083.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 27, 1932.

Paul L. Fourchy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Guy J. D’Antonio, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit, on an -open account, in which it is alleged that the defendant purchased $542.81 worth of merchandise and paid on account thereof $375.82, leaving a balance of $166.99, the amount sued for. Defendant answered, admitting the purchase of the merchandise, but alleged that it amounted only to $375.82, which had been paid, and claimed $6 by way of reconvention. On the day of the trial of the case below, defendant interposed an exception of no cause of action and objected to the introduction of any evidence in proof of plaintiff’s demand. The exception was based upon the manner in which the itemized account, which was attached to the petition, had been drawn. For example, only the date, the invoice number, and the amounts were given. This defendant’s counsel characterized as a series of numbers only, the effect of which, it was asserted, prevented the introduction of proof in support of the plaintiff’s demand. The objection was overruled and the trial proceeded, defendant offering no evidence and relying solely upon his exception of no cause of action.

Judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

In our opinion the action of the trial court was correct. Defendant’s remedy was an exception of vagueness. Having proceeded to trial and offering no evidence whatever, there was nothing for the court to do but to award plaintiff judgment as prayed for. However vague the statement may have been, it was amply proven by the testimony administered.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32**

**Certificate pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstGeorgia Community Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Coleman, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ JOHN L. COLEMAN                                                                                  |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                      |
|   |   |   | **John L. Coleman,** **President** **and** **C.E.O****(Principal Executive Officer)** |

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                                       |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ ELAINE S. KENDRICK                                                                                                     |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                            |
|   |   |   | **Elaine S. Kendrick,** **Secretary** **and** **Treasurer****(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)** |

August 13, 2003

22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-956-1910-07-5MMS; ES-055517 Group No. 180 Wisconsin] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153, Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. 

The lands we surveyed are:

## Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin 

T. 35 N., R. 12 E.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the west boundary, and a portion of the subdivisional lines; a corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the west boundary, and a portion of the subdivisional lines; a corrective resurvey of the subdivision of section 20; and the survey of the subdivision of sections 15, 16, 17, 21, and 22, Township 35 North, Range 12 East, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, and was accepted September 5, 2008.

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. 

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. 

Dated: September 10, 2008. 

Ronald J. Eberle, 

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. E8-21826 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CALTON, INC.
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the annual report of Calton, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Laura
A. Camisa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2005                By: /s/ Laura A. Camisa
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Laura A. Camisa
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                        (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING
                                        OFFICER)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00816

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.L.

, a Child

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 11

- 21526

- CV

Honorable Thomas F . Lee, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 12 , 2014

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant G.L. and appellant E.A. filed separate notices of appeal from the trial court’s

O rder of Termination and Final Order in Suit Affecting the Parent

- Child Relationship. The order

named G.L. as possessory conservator of the minor child A.M.L., but t erminated E.A.’s parental

rights to the minor child A.M.L. Appellant G.L. filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. We grant

G.L.’s motion and dismiss the appeal filed by G.L. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). The appeal

filed by appellant E.A. is retained on this court’s docket.

PER CURIAM
H. Res. 961 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 20, 2008. 

Whereas the 297th Infantry and the scout group of the Alaska Army National Guard deployment of almost 600 Alaskans was the largest deployment of the Alaska National 

Guard since World War II; 

Whereas the Alaskans of the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry 

came from 80 different communities across Alaska; 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry included 75 soldiers from New York, Mississippi, Illinois, Georgia and 

Puerto Rico; 

Whereas the 586 soldiers of the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry were mobilized in July of 2006 and deployed to Camp 

Shelby, Mississippi; 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry was deployed to 

Camp Virginia, Camp Navstar and Camp Buehring in 

Northern Kuwait; 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry courageously performed route and perimeter security missions, mounted 

combat patrols and inspections and searches of vehicles 

going into Iraq from Kuwait, among other assignments; 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry, over the course 

of 12 months in Kuwait and Iraq, inspected and searched 

over 30,000 semi-trucks; 
2 

•HRES 961 EH 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry designed all force 

protection plans in northern Kuwait; 

Whereas the families of the members of the 3rd Battalion, 

297th Infantry have provided unwavering support while 

waiting patiently for their loved ones to return; 

Whereas the employers of members and family members of 

the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry have displayed patriotism over profit, by keeping positions saved for the returning soldiers and supporting the families during the difficult days of this long deployment, and these employers 

are great corporate citizens through their support of 

members of the Armed Forces and their family members; 

Whereas the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry has performed admirably and courageously; gaining the gratitude and respect of Alaskans and all Americans; and 

Whereas members of the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry received 3 Bronze Stars, 12 Meritorious Service Medals, 

142 Army commendations and more than 200 Army 

Achievement Medals for their outstanding service: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That Congress— 

(1) commends the 3rd Battalion, 297th Infantry of 

the Alaska Army National Guard upon its completion of 

deployment and brave service to the Commonwealth of 

Alaska and the citizens of the United States; and 

(2) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Adju-
3 

•HRES 961 EH 

tant General of the Alaska National Guard for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.