alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The court addressed the provisions of the settlement

agreement pertaining to the cap on First American’s liability and

its exceptions in the order issued on April 28, 2008. The

parties did not move for reconsideration or otherwise indicate

that the court’s interpretation of their settlement agreement was

erroneous.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James Scott, et al.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-286-JD

First American Title

Insurance Company

O R D E R

In response to the most recent order denying, without

prejudice, the parties’ joint motion for preliminary approval of

the proposed class action settlement, First American Title

Insurance Company filed a motion for a conference with the court. 

The plaintiffs did not object. A telephone conference was held

on September 3, 2008, to address the issues raised by First

American.

During the conference, counsel for First American expressed

concern that the parties had not sufficiently explained that part

of their settlement agreement dealing with a cap on First

American’s liability under their agreement.1 Counsel represented

that despite the cap provision in the agreement, all class

Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 72 Filed 09/04/08 Page 1 of 2
2

members would receive at least 50% of their claims. Plaintiffs’

counsel concurred in that interpretation of the agreement.

Conclusion

The parties shall clarify their agreement to conform to

counsel’s representations made during the telephone conference

and include a copy of the amended agreement as part of the

package of documents that will be submitted in support of the

parties’ renewed motion for preliminary class certification and

approval of the settlement agreement. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

September 4, 2008

cc: Christopher D. Baucom, Esquire

Elizabeth T. Ferrick, Esquire

Wilbur A. Glahn, III, Esquire

Douglas W. King, Esquire

Charles A. Newman, Esquire

Edward K. O'Brien, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00286-JD Document 72 Filed 09/04/08 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Baron Erby, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 322]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Colleen McMahon, J.), rendered July 28, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). Issues of credibility and identification were properly presented to the jury and we find no reason to disturb its determinations. The People’s case featured reliable identifications of defendant by three eyewitnesses to the murder, who were acquainted with defendant.

After sufficient inquiry, the court properly exercised its discretion in excluding defendant’s sister from the courtroom during the testimony of an eyewitness *(see, People v Ming Li,*91 NY2d 913). This eyewitness had given specific testimony before the grand jury concerning defendant’s sister’s threat to kill anyone who testified against her brother *(see, People v Montgomery,*205 AD2d 259, *affd*88 NY2d 1041). That testimony was corroborated by other information indicating that the case was surrounded by a general atmosphere of witness intimidation. Furthermore, the closure order was limited to the exclusion of only one person during the testimony of only one *312of the principal prosecution witnesses. Accordingly, we find that this limited closure was justified by an “overriding interest” (W*aller v Georgia,*467 US 39, 48).

Defendant’s complaints about the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved *(see, People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal *(see, People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133, *lv denied*91 NY2d 976; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2008

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

10

20

30

40

50

60

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2008

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02221-LTB-CBS

CINDY QUINTERO,

Plaintiff,

v.

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., a Florida corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

_____________________________________________________________________

THE COURT having reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and being fully advised in the premises, DOES

HEREBY ORDER that this case is Dismissed with Prejudice, with each party to pay his

or its own attorney’s fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Lewis T. Babcock

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: December 29, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02221-LTB-CBS Document 16 Filed 12/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LARSCOM INCORPORATED FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           50832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10485
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      11404
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 75133
<PP&E>                                           14913
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   80712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           181
<OTHER-SE>                                       69272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     80712
<SALES>                                          35558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 35558
<CGS>                                            15580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (883)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6054
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2179
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF EARNINGS AS OF MARCH 29, 1996 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND THE
NOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FILED IN THE 1996 JEFFERIES GROUP, INC. FIRST QUARTER 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1996
<CASH>                                         127,885
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,854
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          769,172
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            184,510
<PP&E>                                          25,995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,311,542
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     149,954
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            671,398
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             104,612
<LONG-TERM>                                     56,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,311,542
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               34,719
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            13,059
<COMMISSIONS>                                   57,233
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   15,849
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,066
<COMPENSATION>                                  61,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,252
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,252
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,632
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-12 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-12 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending October 24, 2020FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBOGOTA FINANCIAL, MHC                                                                                                   * 3A3Bogota Financial, MHC and Bogota Financial Corp., both of Teaneck, New Jersey, proposed acquisition of Gibraltar Bank, Parsippany, New Jersey, pursuant to Section 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5)of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableMANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY                                                                                 PWIManufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, seeks prior approval to make a public welfare investment, LLC pursuant to Section 208.22(d) of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
Exhibit 21.1

GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

GTA
GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA
LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf
Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in which GTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

GTATierra
Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAWekiva,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABlack
Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPete
Dye, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAStonehenge,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAIB,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Operations, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Condominium, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Golf Resort, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

Golf
Host Securities, Inc., a Florida corporation

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.1.4

Exhibit A  SCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,  ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTS  AND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS

|Date Admitted         |  | Name and address of partners                                              |  | Value of
non-cash capital
contribution |            | Partnership
units issued |           | Approx.
Percentage
Interests |        | Federal ID #
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------ | --------- | ---------------------------- | ------ | ------------
|05/22/1998(1)         |  | Eagle Ridge Resort LLC
37 West 57th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10019 |  | $                                      | 1,198,750  |                          | 35,794    |                              | 0.49   | %           
|02/04/1997            |  | GTA LP, Inc.
14 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                      |           |                          | 7,302,479 |                              | 99.31  | %           
|02/04/1997            |  | GTA GP, Inc.
14 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                      |           |                          | 14,684    |                              | 0.20   | %           
|Total Common OP Units |  |                                                                           |  |                                        |            |                          | 7,352,957 |                              | 100.00 | %           
|                      |  | GTA LP, Inc.
10 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                      | 20,000,000 |                          | 800,000   |                              | 100    | %           

---

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      23**





Consent
                of Independent Registered Public Accounting
                Firm




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement numbers
      333-79561, 333-82805, 33-88952, 333-51188, 333-51190, 333-51192, 333-103625,
      333-103626 and 333-132281 on Form S-8 of our opinion dated May 7, 2007 (November
      21, 2007 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 2 and the
      subsequent events discussed in Note 16), on the consolidated financial
      statements of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and subsidiaries included in the
      Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended February
      28, 2007.





/s/
                LAZAR LEVINE & FELIX LLPLAZAR
                LEVINE & FELIX LLPCertified
                Public Accountants




New
      York,
      New York


November
      21, 2007
#### YOUNG v. CHAYKIN.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Andie J. Zajaceskowski, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 614]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 7, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a sales associate for a home improvement business. At the time he was hired, it was agreed between claimant and the employer that after his initial period of training, claimant would be paid a commission on sales that he generated. As long as he was successfully making sales, he would receive a weekly draw of $400, representing an advance payment of the expected future commissions. After approximately three months on the job, claimant left his employment because he did not receive a weekly paycheck. The employer had warned claimant that no check would be issued to him that week because he had failed to generate sufficient sales, noting that claimant was already in arrears for advance payments he had previously received. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. We affirm.

In general, a claimant’s dissatisfaction with the terms of his employment, including the amount of his compensation, has been found not to constitute good cause for resigning *(see, Matter of Greco [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 796; *Matter of Stalter [Cybex Intl.*—Sweeney], 240 AD2d 830, 831). In the matter under review, it is undisputed that claimant resigned because he did not receive a paycheck. Claimant testified that he expected to receive a weekly paycheck regardless of the amount of sales he generated. The employer testified, however, that claimant had been clearly informed when he was hired that his receipt of a weekly paycheck would be contingent upon his continuing to generate profitable sales. To the extent that this conflict in testimony presented an issue of credibility, it was for the Board to resolve *(see, Matter of Pinedo [Advertising Info. Sys.*—Commissioner *of Labor],*270 AD2d 556; *Matter of Abrams [Sweeney],*240 AD2d 833, 834). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision ruling that claimant left his employment under disqualifying circumstances.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending September 24, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANCO CAM, S.A.U.                                                                                                       FBSEABanco CAM, S.A.U., Alicante, Spain, to establish an international agency to be located in Miami, Florida.Newspaper: 07/30/2011Federal Register: Not applicableBANKIA, S.A.                                                                                                            FBSEABankia, S.A., Valencia, Spain,  to establish an international branch in Miami, Florida.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableFIRST STATE BANK OF THE FLORIDA KEYS HOLDING COMPANY                                                                    CICPrior change in control notice filed by Luis Enrique Cobo and Ana A. Cobo, individually, and Terry Mark Jones and April Jones, individually, all of Key West, Florida, to acquire an additional 48.708 shares of the outstanding common stock of First State Bank of the Florida Keys Holding, and its subsidiary, First State Bank of the Florida Keys, both of Key West, Florida. Total pro forma ownership for each couple will be 12.75 percent.Newspaper: 09/13/2011Federal Register: 09/14/2011FOUR COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                            CICAfter-the-fact change in control notice filed by Richard A. Dykes, Danville, Georgia; Jerry Van Dykes, Cochran, Georgia; and the Everett Dykes Estate to retain 37.3 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Four County Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiary, Four County Bank, both of Allentown, Georgia.Newspaper: 09/28/2011Federal Register: 09/16/2011
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 D0 34 9 . DI ANE ASKEW S v . NAJ ARI AN CAPI TAL LLC.

Up o n c o nsid e ratio n o f the A p p lic atio n f o r D isc retio nary A p p e al, it is o rd ered

that it b e hereby D EN I ED

. N aj arian Cap ital L LC’ s mo tio n to dismiss the a p p lic atio n

is D EN I ED as mo o t.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t i f y t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 

## June 13, 2024

06/13/2024
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Community Bancorp. of our report dated January 10, 2003, included in the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of Community Bancorp.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-18535) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44713) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated January 10, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

/s/ A.M. Peisch & Company, LLP

March 28, 2003
Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 110 Filed 09/02/05 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 110 Filed 09/02/05 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
, i l,t 64 F=I;eCC 09 1 5 ;2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

KAREN L. BARTLETT and GREGORY CASE NO. : 08-cv-358-JL

S. BARTLETT,

Plaintiffs, Judge Joseph N. Laplante

vs.

MUTUAL PHARMACUETICAL

COMPANY, INC., UNITED RESEARCH

LABORATORIES, INC., and BROOKS

PHARMACY,

Defendants.

ORDER

The Court having considered the parties' positions regarding whether the

deposition of Dr. Colleen Ryan will proceed as noticed on Wednesday, September 16,

2009, rules as follows:

Dr. Colleen Ryan will make herself available for a deposition in this case on or

before Monday, September 28, 2009.

SIGNED this day of September, 2009.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 7UDGE

15th /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 70 Filed 09/15/09 Page 1 of 1