alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                 Estimated volume                Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      ______________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1997......    |          16      -1      0        3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3        0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3        5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3        8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9        5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6        5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6        8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1      5        2       10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2     11        4        0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2      6        1       12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
2007......    |           8      -3      0        5        6      .015     -.006      .000     .009     .011
2008......    |        n.a.       5      8     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .008      .013     n.a.     n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

GMAC Mortgage, LLC 

v. Civil No. 08-cv-428-PB

Schaefer Mortgage Corporation, et al

J U D G M E N T

In accordance with Order dated December 23, 2008 by Judge Paul Barbadoro approving

and adopting the Stipulation and Injunction dated December 22, 2008, and the Stipulation of

Dismissal dated December 22, 2008, judgment is hereby entered.

By the Court,

/s/ James R. Starr

James R. Starr, Clerk

February 19, 2009

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00428-PB Document 41 Filed 02/19/09 Page 1 of 1
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2002: Q2... 13.4 11.3 19.6 10.6 27.7 16.8 10.2 12.6 14.2 13.8  Q3... 9.9 6.3 8.0 9.8 12.7 10.6 9.4 9.4 10.6 9.7  Q4... 9.5 7.3 8.8 9.1 32.8 9.3 7.7 8.3 9.7 9.8 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3  Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin D. Hall

v. Civil No. 07-cv-343-PB

Cheshire County 

Department of Corrections

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $7.00 is due no later than

December 20, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the NH

Department of Corrections when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 20, 2007

cc: Kevin D. Hall, pro se

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00343-JL Document 6 Filed 11/20/07 Page 1 of 1
*Release Date: December 31, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| 20   | 2                                      | 6                                                     | 1 | 12 | .042 | .003 | .012 | .002 | .023 |
| 8    | -3                                     | 0                                                     | 5 | 6 | .015 | -.006 | .000 | .009 | .011 |
| n.a. | 5                                      | 8                                                     | 12 | n.a. | n.a. | .008 | .013 | .020 | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, May 5-9, 2008Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,313,049 42,056 125,527 585,261 336,878 79,668 15,90Number of loans 20,134 561 1,790 9,712 4,507 728 3Weighted average maturity (months)1 24.47 36.10 13.76 29.55 15.30 31.49 16.9

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.67 24.94 8.07 8.69 4.32 1.06 7.5

Weighted average risk rating3 3.25 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate 4 5.47 5.68 5.46 5.51 5.12 5.83 5.

 Standard error5 .27 .34 .27 .28 .43 .25 1.2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.35 6.35 6.25 6.61 5.71 6.09 6. 25th percentile 4.59 5.13 4.08 4.59 4.37 5.61 4.5 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.16 5.40 5.71 5.30 5.05 6.27 4.5 Other livestock 5.00 5.80 5.63 5.29 3.96 4.18 n Other current operating expenses7 5.71 5.52 5.80 5.73 5.49 5.52 6.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.51 7.50 6.42 6.06 5.01 5.63 9. Farm real estate 6.37 6.69 6.84 5.99 6.03 7.88 7.7 Other8 5.00 5.39 4.02 4.91 4.89 5.77 5.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 80.29 55.77 51.64 83.49 85.54 88.38 72.4 Under commitment 75.87 80.74 85.20 76.78 91.11 53.76 81.2 Callable 19.55 38.10 49.79 21.03 6.60 4.66 2. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.87 18.17 6.91 3.81 1.47 .70 . Other livestock 6.50 .39 22.49 5.09 6.93 4.54 n Other current operating expenses7 41.83 56.44 42.05 49.26 32.04 22.21 .0 Farm machinery and equipment 5.94 1.11 2.04 4.25 13.07 2.95 8.5 Farm real estate 9.66 15.06 5.90 10.73 7.31 8.78 3. Other8 31.19 8.84 20.62 26.86 39.16 60.83 87.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.73 14.34 10.14 15.67 13.61 9.05 16. Other 81.15 85.12 84.34 78.41 83.92 89.63 76. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02265-REB-KLM

VICTORIA CARBAJAL,

HEBER MARTIN CARBAJAL, and

DEAN CARBAJAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO, a corporation,

MELVA JACKSON, manager for Wells Fargo, in her individual capacity,

CARROL DWYER, supervisor for Wells Fargo, in her individual capacity, and

IRMA LORENA HOLGUIN, lead teller for Wells Fargo, in her individual capacity, and

UNKNOWN EMPLOYEE, teller or banker for Wells Fargo, in her individual capacity,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [Docket No. 12;

Filed September 23, 2011]. The Amended Complaint is ACCEPTED as filed pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Recommendation issued September 13, 2011

[Docket No. 5] is WITHDRAWN as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file with the Court a Certificate of

Service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(B) on or before October 12, 2011, indicating

that Plaintiffs have complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C) by mailing a copy of the

Amended Complaint to each of the Defendants’ last known mailing addresses. Defendants

shall answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint as prescribed by the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) shall be held on December 1, 2011, commencing at 10:00 a.m. in

Courtroom C-204, Second Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout

Street, Denver, Colorado. All provisions of the Order Setting Scheduling/Planning

Conference and Advisement to Pro Se Plaintiffs issued August 31, 2011 [Docket No. 3] are

REINSTATED and effective as of the date of this Minute Order.

Dated: September 27, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02265-REB-KLM Document 14 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-36-PB

Dwight Bennett

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for April 7, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to complete discovery, engage in plea negotiations and 

prepare for trial. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 7, 2009 to June 2, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00036-PB Document 12 Filed 03/24/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 31, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

May 27, 2009 at 3:45 p.m. 

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 24, 2009

cc: Donald A. Kennedy, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00036-PB Document 12 Filed 03/24/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Edward C. Berthiaume

v. Civil No. 08-cv-238-JL

Beryl Cohen, Esq.

O R D E R

On October 29, 2008, plaintiff Berthiaume was ordered to either file return of service

documents or a motion to extend time to effect service or the case would be dismissed without

prejudice. As no response has been filed to this Order, the case is herewith ordered dismissed

without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

December 3, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Edward C. Berthiaume, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00238-JL Document 4 Filed 12/03/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Cincinnati, Middletown & Dayton Motor Freight, Inc., et al. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 25024

— Decided November 21, 1934.)

*Mr. James W. Huffman*and *Messrs. Martin & Gorry,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John W. B richer,*attorney general, and *Mr. Donald G. Power,*for defendant in error.

This cause came on to be heard upon the motion to dismiss the petition in error, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is hereby ordered and adjudged by this court, that the motion be, and the same hereby is, sustained for the reason that the petition in error challenges an order of the Public Utilities Commission entered on July 30, 1934, granting a regular certificate of public convenience and necessity, and the motion pleads that that order has been vacated from the records of the Public Utilities Commission subsequent to the filing of the petition in error in this court. It being further represented, in open court, by counsel for the Public Utilities Commission, that the order entered on July 30, 1934, having been mistakenly made and entered, would be expunged from the records of the Public Utilities Commission, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that this proceeding in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.

*Cause dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevts, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Marc D. Durand, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 15, 2010





/s/ Marc D. DurandMarc D. DurandChief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00604

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.G., A CHILD

,

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVL00732 D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due on October 26, 2015

. On November 23, 2015 , the Webb County District Clerk requested additional time to file the clerk’s record until November 25,

2015

. The request is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due on Nov ember 25

, 201 5

.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 1295 V

Filed: May 15, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

PAMELA M SHAFFER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Stephen S. Crandall, Crandall, Pera, & Wilt LLC, Chagrin Falls, OH, for petitioner.

Darryl R. Wishard , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On September 20, 2017

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of a September 30, 2016 influenza vaccination

. Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 15, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder; pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

e ase of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012 ).intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified to explain petitioner ’ s shoulder pain. Id. at 5 . Respondent further agrees that petitioner suffered
the residual effects of her condition for more than six months and states, “ petitioner has

satisf ied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act .” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kurt
Freudenberg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nu Horizons
Electronics Corp., certify that:





The Form
10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the period ended February 28, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics
Corp. for the periods presented.






/s/ Kurt
Freudenberg


Kurt
Freudenberg


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: 
April 29, 2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics
Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending June 5, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodSUSQUEHANNA BANK                                                                                                        * BranchSusquehanna Bank, Lititz, PA proposes to establish a branch office located at 2343 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, pursuant to Section 9 of the FRANewspaper: 06/11/2010Federal Register: Not applicableTOWER BANCORP INC.                                                                                                      * 3A5Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/09/2010
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending November 10, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment Period1ST SOURCE BANK                                                                                                         * 18C