alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#220) on February 19, 2013, by Defendant Waunita Weingart. The Court construes this Notice

as a motion to change his/her plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea

agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for March 13, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for June 17, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1

3. The final trial preparation conference set for March 13, 2013, and the March 18,

2013, trial date are VACATED.

DATED this 21st day of February, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

Chief United States District Judge
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending April 13, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment Period1ST UNITED BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                * 3A5
#### In the Matter of Ikea L., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tonya L., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Denzel L., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tonya L., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Jalaysia L., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tonya L., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.) In the Matter of Shaquell L., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tonya L., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 4.) In *574the Matter of Darrius B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Tonya L., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 5.)

[745 NYS2d 716]

In five related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of five orders of disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), two entered May 3, 2001, and three entered May 4, 2001, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she permanently neglected her five children, terminated her parental rights with respect to each of the children, and transferred custody and guardianship rights of the children to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purposes óf adoption. The appeals bring up for review the joint fact-finding order of the same court, dated February 13, 2001.

Ordered that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Keeping in mind that the Family Court’s findings, particularly as to the credibility, character, and temperament of the parent and other witnesses, are to be accorded great deference *(see Matter of Celenia R.,*264 AD2d 737, 738), we find that the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the Family Court’s finding of permanent neglect. The presentment agency established by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent attempts to strengthen the parent-child relationship, and that despite its efforts, the mother failed to plan for the future of the children *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368; *Matter of La’Quan De’Vota H.,*259 AD2d 486, 487; *Matter of Alicia Shante H.,*245 AD2d 509, 510; *cf. Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [James Henry N.],*181 AD2d 824). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### Sorgen *v.*The State of Ohio. (Two cases.)

(Nos. 24978 and 24979

— Decided November 21, 1934.)

*Mr. Carlos A. Faulkner*and *Mr. William F. Voegele,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Ezra Z. Shapiro,*director of law, *Mr. Michael A. Picciano*and *Mr. Stephen Gobozy,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same are hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Petitions m error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                       NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Nine Months Ended September 30,
                                                       -------------------------------
                                                            1997          1996
                                                          --------      --------

<S>                                                    <C>             <C>
Average number of common shares outstanding                  6,995

Pro forma shares outstanding                                  --         4,230

Common equivalent shares outstanding:                         --          --
                                                          --------      ------
     Stock options

Total common and common equivalent shares outstanding        6,995       4,230
                                                          ========      ======

Net income (loss)                                         $(14,778)     $1,935
                                                          ========      ======

Earnings per share                                        $  (2.11)
                                                          ========

Pro forma earnings per share                                            $ 0.46
                                                                        ======
</TABLE>







                                       29
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 188

To permanently reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code,

relating to family farmers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To permanently reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the United

States Code, relating to family farmers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT REENACTMENT OF CHAPTER 12.

4 (a) REENACTMENT.—Chapter 12 of title 11, United

5 States Code, as reenacted by section 149 of division C of

6 the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental

7 Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105–277), is reen8 acted.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 302 of the

10 Bankruptcy, Judges, United States Trustees, and Family
2

•HR 188 IH

1 Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986 (28 U.S.C. 581 note) is

2 amended by striking subsection (f).

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall

5 take effect on July 1, 2000.

Æ
Certificate
Pursuant to Section 906


of
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002


CERTIFICATION
OF CFO




In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Bovie Medical Corporation. (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the“Report”), the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
September 18, 2009




/s/ Gary D.
      PickettGary D. PickettChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          14,267
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,896
<INVENTORY>                                     58,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,575
<PP&E>                                         393,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 853,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,702
<BONDS>                                        410,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   853,319
<SALES>                                      2,595,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,595,421
<CGS>                                        2,417,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,417,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               136,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,324
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Stephen D. Rubin, the President of Vita Food Products, Inc., certify
that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vita Food
Products, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)        Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

By: /s/  Stephen D. Rubin
----------------------------------------
           Stephen D. Rubin
               President
    (Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH

PAMELA D. NODLAND and

CHRISTIAN S. NODLAND,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ROSEMARY M. MURPHY, as Public Trustee of Montrose County, Colorado;

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., a California Corporation;

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS

SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE

FOR CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES TRUST

2003-29, a Delaware Corporation;

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware

Corporation;

CAPITAL ONE BANK, a national banking institution; and

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFF 

AND DEFENDANT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Stipulation By and Between

Plaintiffs and Defendant Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America (ECF

No. 14), filed September 29, 2011. After carefully reviewing the above-captioned case

and being fully advised in the premises, I find that the stipulation should be approved. 

Case 1:11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH Document 15 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
-2-

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

1. The property, which is the subject of this action, is described in the First

Amended Complaint (Doc. 2) as:

LOT 28, AMENDED PLAT OF RIVER ESTATES SUBDIVISION FILING

NO. 1, ARE-SUBDIVISION OF UNCOMPAHGRE PARK SUBDIVISION,

FILING NO. 1, AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED APRIL 1, 1986 IN

PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 626, COUNTY OF MONTROSE, STATE OF

COLORADO

which currently has the address of 67990 Tulare Road, Montrose, CO 81403 (the

"Property").

2. The United States claims an interest in the Property based on a Notice of

Federal Tax Lien filed with the Montrose County Clerk and Recorder, IRS Serial No.

240675505, recorded August 9, 2005, at Reception No. 741877 (the “United States’

Lien”).

3. The United States' Lien is for income taxes owed by the Plaintiffs. The

IRS claims the balance due on the United States' Lien is $99,361.03, computed to

November 1, 2011. 

4. Plaintiffs have a tax obligation and the United States' Lien is contingent of

ownership in the Property. 

5. The Plaintiffs' tax obligation is not conditioned on the Plaintiffs' ownership

Case 1:11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH Document 15 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
-3-

of the Property, and the tax obligation remains until paid. 

6. The Parties stipulate that there are no further obligations by the United

States to participate in this litigation, unless otherwise specified by the Court. 

7. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs of litigation with

respect to this Stipulation.

Dated: October 3, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02258-WYD-MEH Document 15 Filed 10/03/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
OFFICE OF THE A-lTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lionomblo Leo Brady, Comudsslmer 

D%p;rrtnsntofB~ 

Austin,Texas 

A 

Dear Mr. Dr%dyi 

Your request for th r%sp%ct to the 

to the Bank00.00 each ye+- 

the purpose 09 

for the pellicd I 

fees collected by the Bmkl.ng 

#A q&&ion hss been raiee5 as to ;Ph%th%r 

or not the $5,000,0O loan prOaded for uzder 

this paragraph of the r5.W is a loan for the 

Basing Department a% a whole or to some particular dl~ieion of that Department. Until 

this quet3tlon has been settfied t&3 Comptroller 

till be unable to set up hi% acaounta for thie 

Departaant. 

~0bvy.ml%ly,it seem% to me, tb% $8,OOO*OO 

aavauce 1% mde for the purpose ef %?Uabling the 
aon. Lee Brady - Page 8 

Doprtmeut to operate during the oarlp months 

of the flsoal year before fees ham been collected in subetautlal sums. In the light of 

tho above, I respectfully subndt the following questlonl 

"1s the $ti,ctoo.oo adtanoe provMed for 

1indtea in its use to any partioular dl.tislon 

of tbo Bauld.qg Department, or may it be uoml 

In such amounts as may be neoessary for the 

maintenance and operation of the Department 

as a rholet" 

Your interpretation of the dot, as dlsolosed 

by your letter, Is, in the opinion of this department, 

the proper one. 

It follors that your bqulry shouldbe answered to the e&feat that the item thus adtanaed may be used 

In such amounts as may be neoeeaary for the tmintenfmce' 

and op%ratlon of the deprtsmnt 8% a whole. 

Very truly yours 

ATTOBIIBI QEIIKRAL OF TBXAS,,j
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14

January 22, 2001



Dave Anderson



Re: Employment Term


Dear Dave,

Volterra is pleased to offer you the position of Vice President of Engineering
on the following terms.

You will be responsible for design engineering, layout, CAD and other design
support. You will report to Jeff Staszak. You will work at our facility located
at 3839 Spinnaker Court in Fremont, California. Of course, Volterra may change
your position, duties, and work location from time to time as it deems
necessary.

Your compensation will be $7692.31 bi-weekly ($200,000 per year), less payroll
deductions and all required withholdings. You will be eligible for the following
standard Company benefits: medical, dental, life, and vision, 401(k), vacation
and sick leave, and holidays. You will receive options on 250,000 shares of
common stock pursuant to the Company's stock option plan. You will also receive
a sign-on bonus of $25,000. This bonus will be refundable in full to the company
should your employment terminate less than one year from your start date.
Details about these benefit plans are available for your review. Volterra may
modify your compensation and benefits from time to time as it deems necessary.

As a Volterra employee, you will be expected to abide by Company rules and
regulations, and sign and comply with a Proprietary Information and Inventions
Agreement, which prohibits unauthorized use or disclosure of Volterra
proprietary information.

Normal working hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. As
an exempt salaried employee, you will be expected to work additional hours as
required by the nature of your work assignments.

You may terminate your employment with Volterra at any tine and for my reason
whatsoever simply by notifying Volterra. Likewise, Volterra may terminate your
employment at any time and for any reason whatsoever, with or without cause or
advance notice. This at-will employment relationship cannot be changed except in
writing signed by a Company officer.

The employment terms in this letter supersede any other agreements or promises
made to you by anyone, whether oral or written. As required by law, this offer
is subject to satisfactory proof of your right to work in the United States,

Please sign and date this letter, and return it to me by


                                       1.
<PAGE>
January 30,2001 if you wish to accept employment at Volterra, under the terms
described above. If you accept our offer, we would like you to start March
12,2001.

We look forward to you favorable reply and to a productive and enjoyable work
relationship.



Sincerely,


/s/ Jeff Staszak
---------------------------
Jeff Staszak
CEO




Accepted:




/s/ David J. Anderson
---------------------------
Dave Anderson




January 25, 2001
---------------------------
Date


                                       2.