alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ted Faraone et al., Appellants, v National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d *350163]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 19, 2001, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to substitute the personal representative of the estate of the deceased defendant John Cannon, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion denied, the cross motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

This is a defamation action based on statements, alleged to be slanderous per se, made by several defendants, including John Cannon, who, at the time of the statement attributed to him, was the president of the defendant National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (NATAS), the New York Chapter of which plaintiff Ted Faraone had been a member for 23 years and a board member for eight years. Cannon died suddenly on June 22, 2001, subsequent to the May 21, 2001 commencement of this action. No substitution of an estate representative has been made. On July 9, 2001, defendants moved, preanswer, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and, in part, CPLR 3016 (a). Plaintiff, a media and public relations consultant who conducts his business through Faraone Communications, Inc., also a plaintiff herein, opposed the motion on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter by virtue of Cannon’s death and cross-moved pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a) for an order directing Cannon’s estate to substitute his personal representative in his stead. The IAS court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding the statements to be qualified by privilege, as to which plaintiffs’ allegations of malice were insufficient to overcome. It denied the cross motion, finding that in light of the determination reached on the merits, the substitution of a legal representative would be “of no significance.” We reverse.

As this Court has noted, “The death of a party divests a court of jurisdiction to conduct proceedings in an action until a proper substitution has been made pursuant to CPLR 1015 (a)” *(Silvagnoli v Consolidated Edison Empls. Mut. Aid Socy.,*112 AD2d 819, 820). Any order after the death of a party and before the substitution of a legal representative is void, *(id.; Wisdom v Wisdom,*111 AD2d 13.) Once a substitution is effected, defendants, if they be so advised, may, of course, move anew for the relief they seek by the motion made herein. Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,747
<INVENTORY>                                     54,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,973
<PP&E>                                         390,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 861,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,821
<BONDS>                                        410,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     290,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   861,814
<SALES>                                      1,485,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,485,836
<CGS>                                        1,386,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,386,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,208)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers,

Plaintiff

v. Case No. 08-cv-417-SM

N.H. State Prison, Warden, et al.,

Defendants

O R D E R

The plaintiff has failed to pay the necessary filing fee as directed by court order dated

April 8, 2009. The plaintiff was notified that the failure to comply with the court’s order would

result in the matter being referred to a judicial officer to enter an order of dismissal without

prejudice. Due to plaintiff’s non-compliance with the court’s order, the case is dismissed

without prejudice pursuant to LR 4.4.

So ordered.

Date: May 19, 2009 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Randolph L. Chambers

Bonnie Reed, Financial Administrator

Tia Maria Hooper, Deputy Clerk 

Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00417-SM Document 27 Filed 05/19/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                          Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11



                   Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
            Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share/Unit
                                 For the Periods

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              April 1, 2002         January 1, 2002
                                                                 through                through
                                                              June 30, 2002          June 30, 2002
                                                              -------------          -------------
                                                               (unaudited)            (unaudited)

<S>                                                               <C>                   <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                                 $  (173,953)          $  (261,963)
                                                                  ===========           ===========

Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding                        4,223,200             4,224,030
                                                                  ===========           ===========

Earnings (Loss) per Unit                                          $     (0.04)          $     (0.06)
                                                                  ===========           ===========

<CAPTION>
                                                              April 1, 2001         January 1, 2001
                                                                 through                through
                                                              June 30, 2001          June 30, 2001
                                                              -------------          -------------
                                                               (unaudited)            (unaudited)

<S>                                                               <C>                   <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                                 $(1,425,379)          $(1,303,901)
                                                                  ===========           ===========

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding                4,224,870             4,214,141
                                                                  ===========           ===========

Earnings per Common Share                                         $     (0.34)          $     (0.31)
                                                                  ===========           ===========
</TABLE>
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00350-WYD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ROBERT WHITTALL,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

A Notice of Disposition was filed in the above matter on October 4, 2011. A

Change of Plea hearing is set for Tuesday, November 22, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents separately to

Judge Daniel’s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 72

HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted, the

hearing will be VACATED. There will be no exceptions to this policy, and

sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply.

Dated: October 4, 2011.

Case 1:11-cr-00350-WYD Document 18 Filed 10/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

         SCHEDULE TO FORM OF ANGELES PRE-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, TYPE II
           PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                LOCATION OF   NUMBER     TOTAL AMOUNT   50% OF DEVELOPER    10% OF DEVELOPER FEE
                LAND          OF UNITS   OF DEVELOPER   FEE PAYABLE ON      PAYABLE AT THE END
                                         FEE            THE EARLIER OF      OF EACH MONTH OF THE
                                                        THE FOLLOWING       FOLLOWING PERIOD
                                                        DATE OR CLOSING     
                                                                            
<S>             <C>           <C>        <C>            <C>                 <C>
BILOXI,         Biloxi,       80         $400,000       December 31, 1998   January 31, 1999 to
MISSISSIPPI     Mississippi                                                 May 31, 1999

LAFAYETTE,      Lafayette,    79         $400,000       December 31, 1998   January 31, 1999 to
LOUISIANA       Louisiana                                                   May 31, 1999

LAKE CHARLES,   Lake          80         $400,000       December 31, 1998   January 31, 1999 to
LOUISIANA       Charles,                                                    May 31, 1999
                Louisiana                                                   
</TABLE>
1 Carolyn W. Colvin, as of Feb. 14, 2013, has been named as the Acting Commissioner of the

Social Security Administration. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, she is

automatically substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02280-WYD

RANDLE S. CRABILL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.1

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with the ORDER entered by the Honorable Wiley

Y. Daniel, U.S. District Judge on March 21, 2013, it is hereby

ORDERED that this civil action is REVERSED and REMANDED to Defendant for

additional administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.

58, in favor or plaintiff Crabill and against the Commissioner, consistent with the United

States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).

Plaintiff may have his costs, upon the filing of a Bill of Costs within fourteen days

of entry of judgment.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 22nd day of March, 2013.

FOR THE COURT,

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk

By: s/ Edward P. Butler 

 Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:11-cv-02280-WYD Document 20 Filed 03/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 989 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 190
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 989

                          [Report No. 110-528]

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
 Representative from the Thirteenth Congressional District of Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on House Administration, 
  reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
 Representative from the Thirteenth Congressional District of Florida.

    Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Thirteenth Congressional District of Florida is 
dismissed.
                                                 House Calendar No. 190

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 989

                          [Report No. 110-528]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
 Representative from the Thirteenth Congressional District of Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 14, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 5 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 6 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 7 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 8 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 9 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 10 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 11 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 12 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 13 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 14 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 15 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 16 of 17
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-5 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 17 of 17
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending March 3, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBOSSHARD FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.                                                                                          * 3A5
<Page>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Amendment to Annual Report of The Dress Barn Inc.
("the Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending July 26, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),
I, Armand Correia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
intended to be used for any other purpose.


/S/ ARMAND CORREIA
------------------------------
Armand Correia
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 18, 2005


                                      F-30
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Oliver Hooper

v. Civil No. 08-cv-426-JD

Larry Blaisdell, Warden,

Northern New Hampshire

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

Before the court for preliminary review is Oliver Hooper ’s

petition for a writ of habeas corpus (document no. 1), filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing

Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court (“§ 2254

Rules”) (requiring initial review to determine whether the

petition is facially valid and may be served). Petitioner is in

state custody and specifically alleges that he has exhausted his

available state remedies for each of the federal claims presented

here. The petition may, therefore, be considered, see 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(a) & (b) (providing that the writ “shall not be granted”

unless petitioner is in state custody and has exhausted all

available or effective state remedies), and I order the petition

to be served on Respondent. See § 2254 Rule 4.

The petition shall be served upon Respondent, which shall

file an answer or other pleading in response to the allegations

Case 1:08-cv-00426-JD Document 4 Filed 02/04/09 Page 1 of 2
2

made therein. See id. (requiring reviewing judge to order a

response to the petition). The Clerk’s office is directed to

serve the New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General as

provided in the Agreement On Acceptance Of Service, copies of

this Order and the habeas petition (document no. 1). Respondent

shall answer or otherwise plead within thirty (30) days of the

date of this Order. The answer shall comply with the

requirements of § 2254 Rule 5 (setting forth contents of the

answer). Upon receipt of the response, the Court will determine

whether a hearing is warranted. See § 2254 Rule 8 (providing

circumstances under which a hearing is appropriate). 

Petitioner is referred to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, which requires

that every pleading, written motion, notice, and similar paper,

after the petition, shall be served on all parties. Such service

is to be made by mailing the material to the parties’ attorneys. 

SO ORDERED. 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 4, 2009 

cc: James Q. Butler, Esq.

Sven D. Wiberg, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00426-JD Document 4 Filed 02/04/09 Page 2 of 2
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41994
          69
          10
          11
          15
          33
          .187
          .026
          .032
          .037
          .0821995
          51
          -2
          14
          13
          25
          .131
          -.004
          .039
          .032
          .0611996
          95
          16
          27
          24
          30
          .240
          .039
          .070
          .058
          .0711997
          93
          6
          19
          19
          50
          .230
          .014
          .049
          .045
          .1121998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          n.a.
          8
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: August 25, 2005