alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles O. Wright III et al., Respondents, v Cetek Technologies, Inc., Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 890]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), entered December 5, 2005, which, after a nonjury trial, and upon a decision of the same court dated February 22, 2005, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $74,500.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment *(see*CELR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, a case is tried without a jury, this Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, although due regard must be given to the decision of the trial judge who was in a position to assess the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses *(see Huron St. Realty Corp. v Lorenzo,*19 AD3d 450, 451 [2005]). “[T]he trial court’s determination will generally not be disturbed on appeal unless it is obvious that the conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(id.*at 451, quoting *Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest.,*169 AD2d 829, 830 [1991]). Here, the trial court’s determination awarding the plaintiffs judgment against the defendant in the principal sum *603of $74,500 was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence. H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending August 8, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodMAINSTREET BANK                                                                                                         * BranchMainStreet Bank, Herndon, Virginia, to establish a branch at 3101 N 10th St., Arlington, VirginiaNewspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending December 31, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFARMERS STATE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                          * 3A5Farmers State Bancshares, Inc., Dodge, Nebraska, to merge with Farmers State Bancshares II, Inc., Spencer, Nebraska, parent of Farmers State Bank, Spencer, Nebraska.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/23/2017GRACE INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.                                                                                          CICThe Bryant James Gingrich 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the Bryant James Gingrich 2016 Irrevocable Trust, and Bryant James Gingrich, acting in his capacity as trustee of both such trusts, all three of Alva, Oklahoma, the Chad Wisdom McManus 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the Chad Wisdom McManus 2016 Irrevocable Trust, and Chad Wisdom McManus, acting in his capacity as trustee of both such trusts, all three of Enid, Oklahoma, and the Kelsey Grace Gingrich 2012 Irrevocable Trust, the Kelsey Grace Hunter 2016 Irrevocable Trust, and Kelsey Grace Hunter, n�e Gingrich, acting in her capacity as trustee of both such trusts, all three of Edmond, Oklahoma; to acquire shares of Grace Investment Company, Inc., Alva Oklahoma, and for approval as members of the Peggy J. Wisdom Family Control Group.  Grace Investments Company, Inc. is the parent company of Alva State Bank and Trust, Alva, Oklahoma; First National Bank in Okeene, Okeene, Oklahoma; and The First State Bank, Kiowa, Kansas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/18/2017OSBORNE INVESTMENTS, INC.                                                                                               CICSteven L. Bihlmaier, Osborne, Kansas, and Douglas D. Bihlmaier, Dairen, Connecticut, Osborne, Kansas, to acquire control of Osborne Investments, Inc., parent of The Farmers Bank of Osborne, both of Osborne, Kansas through the acquisition of voting shares and for approval as a member of the Bihlmaier Family Group.  In addition, Cheryl A. Bihlmaier, Osborne, Kansas, as a member of the Bihlmaier Family Group, to retain shares of Osborne Investments, Inc., parent of The Farmers Bank of Osborne, both of Osborne, Kansas.Newspaper: 01/11/2017Federal Register: 01/03/2017STATE EXCHANGE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                         CICClay Muegge and Chad Muegge, both of Lamont, Oklahoma, to retain shares of State Exchange Bancshares, Inc., Lamont, Oklahoma, and for approval as members of the Muegge Family Group that controls State Exchange Bancshares, Inc., parent of State Exchange Bank, both of Lamont. Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007...... 100.0 3.2 12.3 36.6 29.4 11.8 4.5 2.2 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008...... 100.0 7.4 15.2 35.0 27.0 9.9 3.8 1.6 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2 2009...... 100.0 12.2 19.7 34.8 22.4 7.9 2.0 1.1 7.0 -2.0 .7 -.2 2005: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.3 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.7 4.6 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.4 6.6 .9 .7  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 1.5 .3 .2  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 2.5 .6 .3  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 7.6 2.4 .8 .3  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2 2009: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 1.8 .5 .2 .0  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.7 -.3 .4 .0  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.5 -.5 .6 -.1  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 7.0 -2.0 .7 -.2 2010: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.1 .6 .2 .1  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending August 29, 2009FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFNBPA BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                     3A1FNBPA Bancorp, Inc., Port Allegany, to become a bank holding by acquiring 100 percent of First National Bank of Port Allegany, Port Allegany, PA.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableSUSQUEHANNA BANK                                                                                                        * BranchSusquehanna Bank, Lititz, PA to establish a branch office located at 1800 Dual Highway, Hagerstown, MD, pursuant to Section 9 of the FRA.Newspaper: 09/03/2009Federal Register: Not applicable
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 08-mc-72-PB

Richard Wyckoff

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 1, 2008, no objection having been filed. Therefore, Mr.

Wyckoff is hereby ordered to obey the summons and that he appear on January 12,

2009 at 9:00 a.m. at 1000 Elm Street, Suite 900, Manchester, New Hampshire,

before Denise Anderson to give testimony and produce all books and records in

his possession or control required and called for by the terms of the summons of

April 9, 2008. The government is awarded its costs.

SO ORDERED.

December 31, 2008 /s/Paul J. Barbadoro 

Paul J. Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: T. David Plourde , AUSA

Richard Wyckoff, pro se

Case 1:08-mc-00072-PB Document 5 Filed 12/31/08 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending August 24, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodDELMAR BANCORP                                                                                                          CICMr. Kenneth Ray Lehman of Arlington, Virginia, to acquire 40% of Delmar Bancorp, Salisbury, Maryland.Newspaper: 09/06/2013Federal Register: Not availableNEW PEOPLES BANKSHARES, INC.                                                                                            CICHarold Lynn Keene, H.L. Keene, L.L.C., Arbutus Keene, The Harold Lynn Keene Trust, Charlotte Keene, and Elizabeth Keene, all of Lebanon, Virginia, as group acting in concert, to retain control of New Peoples Bankshares, Inc., Honaker, Virginia.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableUNION FIRST MARKET BANKSHARES CORPORATION                                                                               * 3A5Union First Market Bankshares Corporation, Richmond, Virginia, to acquire 100% of the voting securities of StellarOne Corporation, Charlottesville, Virginia, and thereby indirectly acquire StellarOne Bank, Christiansburg, Virginia.Newspaper: 09/23/2013Federal Register: 09/20/2013WESTERN ACQUISITIONS, L.L.C.                                                                                            * 4c8Western Acquisition Partners LLC, Washington, D.C. (to be relocated and renamed H Bancorp, Columbia, Maryland) proposes to: 1) acquire 22.83% of the voting securities of Carrollton Bancorp, Lutherville, Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire a controlling interest in Bay Bank, FSB, Lutherville, Maryland; and 2) acquire 6.84% of FirstAtlantic Financial Holdings, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire a similar interest in FirstAtlantic Bank, Jacksonville, Florida.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 09/19/2013
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          Inconnection with Amendment No. 4 to the Annual Report of Burlington CoatFactory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for thefiscal year ended May 29, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert LaPenta,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge that:

          (1)     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

/s/  Robert LaPentaRobert LaPentaVice President - Chief Accounting Officer [Principal Financial Officer]April 19, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) AS ADOPTED,
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David R. Jaffe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Dress Barn, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 13, 2004


/s/ David R. Jaffe
David R. Jaffe
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
1 The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

2 The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-1700

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Dexter Neal, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 12, 2000 Filed: September 25, 2000

___________ Before McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dexter Neal appeals his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for distribution of cocaine base and cocaine. Defendant argues the District Court 2 erred by denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict based upon insufficiency of the evidence, and claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel.-2-

We conclude the evidence presented is adequate to sustain the jury's verdict. See UnitedStates v. Hawkey , 148 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 1998) (setting out standard of review). Furthermore, we conclude that the defendant's ineffective assistance claim is not timely; we reach this conclusion without prejudice to defendant's right to bring a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Iversen , 90 F.3d 1340, 1342 (8th Cir. 1996) (dismissing ineffective assistance claim without prejudice to defendant's right to bring motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
H. Res. 982 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 14, 2008. 

Resolved, That House Resolution 979 and House Resolution 980 are hereby adopted. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 21.1

GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

GTA GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA
LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf
Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in which GTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

SandpiperGolf
Trust, LLC, a California limited liability company

GTATierra
Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAOsage,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPalm
Desert, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABrentwood,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAManagement,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

Sandpiper
GTA Development, Inc. (dissolved effective 12/31/99)

GTASweetwater,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAWekiva,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTACypress
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPolo
Trace, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABlack
Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTABonaventure,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPete
Dye, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAMystic
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAStonehenge,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTALost
Oaks, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAInnisbrook,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

---

QuickLinks
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 7, 2014

No. 04-13-00761-CR

Ruben NERIO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005CR1231

The Honorable Angus K. McGinty, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due on February 26, 2014. Appellant is represented on 

appeal by appointed counsel, Mr. Mark E. Braswell. Mr. Braswell has been granted one 

extension of time in which to file the brief, until March 26, 2014. Neither the brief nor a motion 

for extension of time has been filed.

It is therefore, ORDERED that Mr. Braswell shall file appellant’s brief in this court no 

later April 25, 2014. No further extensions of time will be granted. If Mr. Braswell fails to 

file appellant’s brief by April 25, 2014, this cause will be abated for the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine whether: (1) appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) appellant is 

indigent, and if so, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the 

effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel; and (3) 

counsel has abandoned the appeal. Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court will be 

asked to address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the 

hearing. 

The Clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Braswell by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, and by United States mail. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7613-7614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Review of a Revised 
Information Collection: RI 25-37

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised 
information collection. RI 25-37, Evidence to Prove Dependency of a 
Child, is designed to collect sufficient information for OPM to 
determine whether the surviving child of a deceased federal employee is 
eligible to receive benefits as a dependent child.
    Comments are particularly invited on: whether this collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the 
Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical 
utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection 
of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, through use of 
the appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Approximately 250 forms are completed annually. We estimate it 
takes approximately 60 minutes to assemble the needed documentation. 
The annual estimated burden is 250 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, Fax (202) 418-3251 or via E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4904283b300b2c3d21671a24203d21641d2626242c3009263924672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c517d6e655e796874324f71756874314873737179655c736c71327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include your mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Ronald W. Melton, Deputy 
Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement 
and Insurance Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E 
Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.
    For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination--Contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/
Support Group, (202) 606-0623.


[[Page 7614]]


Office of Personnel Management.
Howard Weizmann,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E8-2315 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>