alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,296
<PP&E>                                             948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (216)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,274
<BONDS>                                         14,032
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,322
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,792
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,797
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    77
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.89)
        
 

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB

CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY, 

d/b/a The Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People,

Plaintiff,

v.

REGGIE BICHA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of

Human Services, and

TERESA A. BERNAL, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of the Colorado Mental

Health Institute at Pueblo,

Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) A second supplemental settlement conference will be held on February 27, 2012,

at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado. All settlement conferences that take place before the magistrate judge

shall be confidential. Pro se parties, attorneys, and client representatives with full authority to

settle the case must be present at the settlement conference in person or by telephone. Anyone

planning to attend the conference by telephone must contact my chambers on or before

February 20, 2012, to make all necessary arrangements;

(2) Representatives for the defendants authorized to discuss the plaintiff’s demand

for attorneys fees must be present at the conference in person; and

(3) On or before February 6, 2012, the plaintiff shall serve on defendants’ counsel a

Case 1:11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB Document 37 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

written demand for attorneys fees, including contemporaneous time records (redacted or edited

to protect issues of privilege and trial strategy, if necessary); evidence establishing that the

hourly rate claimed is reasonable; a summary of the attorneys’ qualifications and experience; and

the total amount claimed, including a description of its basis.

Dated January 30, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB Document 37 Filed 01/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Principal  Executive      Officer, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of      2002.**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended                June                2, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|  **/s/                  Mark A. Nesci**            |
| **Mark                A. Nesci**                             |
| **President                and Principal Executive Officer** |
|                                                         |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2086 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2086

  To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
 Code, may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or 
certified acupuncturist, massage therapist, naturopathic physician, or 
      midwife, without supervision or referral by another health 
                             practitioner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2001

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
 Code, may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or 
certified acupuncturist, massage therapist, naturopathic physician, or 
      midwife, without supervision or referral by another health 
                             practitioner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alternative Medical Access for 
Federal Employees Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. HEALTH BENEFITS COVERAGE.

    (a) In General.--Section 8902(k) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``acupuncturist, massage therapist, 
        naturopathic physician,'' after ``nursing school administered 
        clinic,'' each place it appears; and
            (2) by striking ``nurse midwife,'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``nurse midwife or other midwife,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to contracts entered into or renewed on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH

DWAYNE A. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERWIN MOZER, M.D, and

NURSE JANE DOE, individually,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

I. Pursuant to the Order (Doc. #41) of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered

February 20, 2012, it is 

ORDERED that the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #38) is GRANTED, and

that, accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all of plaintiff's claims against

defendants the Board of County Commissioners for Arapahoe County, Colorado and

Dave Welcher are dismissed, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. 

2. Pursuant to the Order (Doc #82) of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on

August 30, 2012 it is

ORDERED that Defendant Erwin Mozer, M.D.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Prisoner Complaint [#6] [Docket No. 34] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s third claim for relief against defendant Erwin Mozer is

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 83 Filed 09/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
DISMISSED. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s claim against defendant Nurse Jane Doe is

DISMISSED. Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants

and against Plaintiff DWAYNE A. JONES, who recovers nothing, and this action is

dismissed in its entirety.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 5th day of September, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By: s/Edward P. Butler

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 83 Filed 09/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Bradley, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 904]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.), rendered July 12,1982, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Browne, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to meet their burden of proving his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes for which he was convicted is without merit. The two witnesses’ observations of the defendant *under*adequate lighting conditions during the commission of the crimes enabled them to positively and accurately identify the defendant at trial *(see People v Godbolt,*209 AD2d 540; *People v Hyatt,*162 AD2d 713). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, although there were minor inconsistencies in the respective testimony of the witnesses, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant also contends that he was denied the effective *465assistance of counsel. In resolving claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the critical issue is whether, viewed in totality, the defense counsel provided meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147). The defendant’s disagreement with the defense counsel’s failure to demand a reopening of the *Wade*hearing *(see United States v Wade,*388 US 218) does not amount to a deprivation of effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and McGinity, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS LELAND FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor; and LIKEN, Education Department,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Freeman’s motions seeking an 

extension of time to file his reply in support of his summary judgment motion (Doc. 173),

and his motion seeking to extend the page limits for that reply (Doc. 172). Those 

motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have an additional fifteen days to file his reply, 

and that reply may be no more than fifteen pages in length.

Dated this 9th day of October , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/ David M. Ebel

 

U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 176 Filed 10/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
#### Vincent Mark CASTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melissa HEBERT, Parole Officer; Michael McNulty, Judge; Joe Roberts, Assistant District Attorney; Harry Lee; Unidentified Parties, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-31132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Vincent Mark Castillo, proceeding *pro se*and *in forma pauperis,*appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.

Castillo does not challenge the district court’s reasons for dismissing his claims against the various defendants related to the probation revocation proceedings. *See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). He merely reiterates his assertion that he was never actually on probation and that the revocation proceeding was thus unlawful. Thus, Castillo has abandoned any challenge to the district court’s reasons for dismissing his claims concerning the probation revocation proceeding. *See id.*

Liberally construed, Castillo’s brief contains an assertion that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with prejudice after he sought leave to withdraw them until such time as the *Heck*** condi*383tions were met. Castillo has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his claims with prejudice. *Boyd v. Biggers,*31 F.3d 279, 282-84 (5th Cir.1994).

To the extent that Castillo seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to his probation revocation proceeding, this appeal from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is not the proper forum within which to seek such relief. Castillo’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Castillo is cautioned that future frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. He is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

**

*Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Unwired Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June, 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Jerry E. Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jerry E. Vaughn    
|Jerry E. Vaughn        
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 22, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSIRE 

United States of America 

v. Civil No. 08-463-PB 

Joel A. Jackson 

ORDER TO DISCOVER AND TO APPEAR FOR 

HEARING ON PERIODIC PAYMENT OF THE JUDGMENT 

Upon Motion of the United States of America, it is 

ORDERED that the Defendant appear at the U.S. District Court 

for the District of New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street, Courtroom 

No. , Concord, New Hampshire, on the 19thday of June 

2012, at 11:30 , for a hearing to establish a schedule 

for periodic payment of the judgment. It is further 

ORDERED that the Defendant, on the above-noted date, 

participate in the disclosure of his financial assets and 

liabilities by completing the financial statement attached to 

Plaintiff's Motion as Exhibit B, by providing copies of all 

documents listed on Exhibit c to Plaintiff's Motion and by further 

answering any questions propounded by Plaintiff or the Court 

regarding his financial assets and liabilities and his ability to 

repay the judgment entered against him on January 22, 2009. 

Dated at Concord, New Hampshire this day of June 

2012. 

/s/ Paul Barbadoro 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

cc: Michael T. McCormack, AUSA 

Joel A. Jackson 

Case 1:08-cv-00463-PB Document 13 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Brittany M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Ulster County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Natalie N., Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 440]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Ulster County (Work, J.), entered December 28, 2004, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend the placement of respondent’s child.

The order of extension at issue has expired by its own terms, rendering this appeal moot *(see Matter of Miguel HH.,*285 AD2d 692, 692 [2001]). We therefore dismiss the appeal.

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 19 8 . CUPPETT v . MI RTSCHI NK et a l

.

W e g ran t ed p l ai n t i ff Sh aro n Cu p pet t ’ s i n terl o cu t o r y ap p l icat i o n t o co n s i d er wh et h er th e t ri al co u rt erred i n ap p l y i n g Al ab am a l a w t o t h i s act i o n , wh ich ari s es fro m Cu p p et t’ s fal l do wn a fl i g h t o f s t ai rs at t h e d efen d an t s ’ Al ab am a l ak e h ou s e. Th e i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal was d o ck et ed o n Au g u s t 1 4 , 2 01 9

.

Ha v i n g r ev iewed t h e reco rd an d t h e ap p l icab l e l aw, we no w D ISM ISS t h i s
ap p eal as i m

p ro v i d en t l y

g ran ted

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. February 05, 2020

02/05/2020
**BERRY
      . DUNN . MCNEIL & PARKER**


**BDMP**





CERTIFIED
      PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


MANAGEMENT
      CONSULTANTS







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      of
      Community Bancorp. of our report dated March 20, 2007, with respect to the
      consolidated financial statements included in the 2006 Annual Report to
      Shareholders of Community Bancorp.





We
      also
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-3 No. 333-127024) pertaining to the Community Bancorp. Dividend Reinvestment
      Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44713) pertaining to
      the
      Community Bancorp. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated March 20, 2007,
      with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
      reference of Community Bancorp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
      for the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/
      Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker





Portland,
      Maine


March
      20,
      2007


Vermont
      Registration No. 92-0000278
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date:  May 15, 2003                                    /s/ Stephen D. Rubin
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       Stephen D. Rubin,
                                                           President
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)