alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**

 

**List of subsidiaries of the Company:**

| **Name of Subsidiary**             | **Jurisdiction of Organization or Incorporation** |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| UniFirst Holdings, Inc.            | Delaware                                          |
| UniTech Services Group, Inc.       | California                                        |
| UniFirst First-Aid Corporation     | Maryland                                          |
| UniTech Services Canada Ltd.       | Canada                                            |
| UniTech Services SAS               | France                                            |
| Euro Nuclear Services B.V.         | Netherlands                                       |
| Euro Nuklear Services, GmbH        | Germany                                           |
| Euro Nuclear Services Limited      | United Kingdom                                    |
| UniFirst Canada Ltd.               | Canada                                            |
| RC Air LLC                         | New Hampshire                                     |
| UONE Corporation                   | Massachusetts                                     |
| Uniformes de San Luis S.A. de C.V. | Mexico                                            |
| UniFirst S.A. de C.V.              | Mexico                                            |
| UniFirst Far East Limited          | Hong Kong                                         |
| UniFirst Manufacturing Corporation | Massachusetts                                     |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert LaPenta, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Robert LaPenta
Robert LaPenta
Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer [Principal Financial Officer]
April 12, 2005
March 21, 1997



   Office of the Chief Accountant
   Securities and Exchange Commission
   Mail Stop 11-3
   450 Fifth Street, N.W.
   Washington, D.C.  20549

   Dear Sirs:

   We have read Item 9 included in the attached Form 10-K dated for the year 
   ended December 31, 1996, of Carrington Laboratories, Inc.(the Registrant) 
   filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are in agreement
   with the statements contained therein.

   Very Truly yours,

   Arthur Anderson LLP




   By /s/
      Steve G. Scott

   PLR

   Copy to:
   Ms. Sheri Pantermuehl, Chief Financial Officer
   Carrington Laboratories, Inc.
<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY’S MOTION FOR

AUTHORIZATION TO DEPOSIT FUNDS AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AND

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEPOSITED FUNDS SHOULD NOT BE RELEASED

TO MOLYCHEM, LLC

On April 4, 2008, the plaintiff filed a pleading designated Climax Molybdenum

Company’s Motion for Authorization to Deposit Funds and Satisfaction of Judgment,

asserting that it is prepared to pay the full amount of the judgment entered against it

and in favor of Molychem, LLC, but that counsel of record for defendant Molychem,

LLC, the judgment creditor, Donald T. Trinen and Ramon L. Pizarro, were requesting to

be made payees with Molychem, LLC, on the check to be issued in payment of the

judgment. On April 1, 2008, Ramon L. Pizarro filed a Notice of Attorney’s Lien

(incorrectly docketed as having been filed by Molychem, LLC). No motion for

enforcement of attorney’s lien has been filed by Mr. Pizarro. It is now

ORDERED that Climax Molybdenum Company’s Motion for Authorization to

Deposit Funds is granted and that upon deposit of the full amount of the judgment, with
accrued interest, into the registry of this court, the monetary portion of the judgment of

March 12, 2008, will be satisfied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Molychem, LLC, Ramon Pizarro and Donald Trinen

shall show cause in writing to be filed on or before May 1, 2008, why the Clerk should

not disburse the deposited funds to Molychem, LLC. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that because Molychem, LLC, and its counsel of record

appear to be adverse interests in the matter of disbursement of the funds, a copy of this

order shall be sent directly to William Thiede, c/o Molychem, LLC, P. O. Box 5063,

Rockford, IL 61125.

DATED: April 8th, 2008

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Annual Report of Schawk, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ David A. Schawk     David A. Schawk     President and Chief Executive Officer        /s/ James J. Patterson     James J. Patterson     Sr. Vice President and     Chief Financial Officer        March 15, 2007  
80
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending March 12, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, INC.                                                                                MemberFirst State Bank and Trust Company, Inc., Caruthersville, Missouri, to become member of the Federal Reserve System.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableFIRST UNITED, INC.                                                                                                      CICNotice by The Greenwood Childrens' Trust, Brentwood, Tennessee, with Jane Allison Crewse, Brentwood, Tennessee; Ann Greenwood Watson, Owensboro, Kentucky; Helen Virginia Futvoye, Jackson, Mississippi; and William Lawton Greenwood, Columbia, South Carolina, as trustees, to retain control of First United, Inc., Central City, Kentucky.Newspaper: 03/29/2011Federal Register: 03/31/2011
**Exhibit    11** **Milacron    Inc. and Subsidiaries****Computation of Per-Share Earnings**            **2007**  **2006**   **(In thousands, except per-share amounts)**      Loss from continuing operations     $    (88,223    )     $    (39,785    )    Income (loss) from discontinued operations      1,172       81              Net loss      (87,051    )      (39,704    )    Less preferred dividends      (6,240    )      (6,240    )    Less beneficial conversion feature related to Series B    Preferred Stock      (3,117    )      (3,117    )             Net loss available to common shareholders     $    (96,408    )     $    (49,061    )             Basic loss per share:            Weighted-average common shares outstanding      5,008       4,833              Per share amount:            Continuing operations     $    (19.48    )     $    (10.17    )    Discontinued operations      .23       .02              Net loss     $    (19.25    )     $    (10.15    )             Diluted loss per share:            Weighted-average common shares outstanding(a)      5,008       4,833              Per share amount:            Continuing operations     $    (19.48    )     $    (10.17    )    Discontinued operations      .23       .02              Net loss     $    (19.25    )     $    (10.15    )               (a)     In all years, the common shares into which the Series B    Preferred Stock is convertible are excluded because their    inclusion would result in a smaller loss per common share. In    all years, potentially dilutive restricted shares are also    excluded for similar reasons.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Gaffney the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ PETER J. GAFFNEY   
|Peter J. Gaffney       
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: December 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 21

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent corporation of 294 subsidiaries which operate @off-price@ retail stores in the United States.
Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation, which buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in connection with the Company=s business.
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, which leases the Company=s store in Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania to one of the Company=s operating subsidiaries.
Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates a wholesale apparel business.

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an interest in a manufacturer of coats.

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade names.

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is an investment holding company.

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting on Thursday, February 28, 2008. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2. 

                        The meeting agenda includes the following:                              ( print page 7250)    

(1) Welcome/Introductions 

(2) Environmental Education 

(3) Updates on Respect the Resource 

(4) General LBL Updates 

(5) Board Discussion of Comments Received 

The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by February 21, 2008, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. Board members will review written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 28, 2008, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., CST. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Kentucky Dam Village State Resort Park, Gilbertsville, Kentucky, and will be open to the public. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211, 270-924-2002. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None. 

Dated: January 22, 2008. 

William P. Lisowsky, 

Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.

[FR Doc. E8-2292 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2007 Q1 survey,

region share of national

total 2.8 8.9 26.2 22.6 8.0 5.0 4.5 8.5 5.3 8.1

Sample coverage, 2007 Q1

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 10.0 3.3 18.7 34.1 20.8 11.6 8.5 6.0 8.4 29.4

Avg. loan size, 2007 Q1 survey

(thousands of dollars) 97.4 35.3 63.7 70.9 82.6 134.4 213.1 55.8 66.5 129.3

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9

Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1

Q3 6.4 7.5 5.8 6.5 4.6 6.0 7.5 7.3 6.5 5.3

Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

(0.19) (0.21) (0.77) (0.75) (0.28) (0.65) (0.33) (0.19) (0.05) (0.18)

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

(0.18) (0.23) (0.28) (0.70) (0.20) (0.57) (0.43) (0.30) (0.09) (0.07)

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

(0.80) (0.19) (0.35) (0.45) (0.23) (0.58) (0.49) (0.10) (0.07) (0.16)

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

(0.29) (0.15) (0.21) (0.37) (0.13) (0.37) (0.29) (0.12) (0.26) (0.25)

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

(0.47) (0.18) (0.40) (0.54) (0.15) (0.53) (0.13) (0.26) (0.26) (0.17)

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

(0.58) (0.16) (0.12) (0.38) (0.30) (0.28) (0.29) (0.17) (0.21) (0.21)

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

(0.26) (0.24) (0.53) (0.38) (0.32) (0.63) (0.17) (0.18) (0.31) (0.14)

2007: Q1 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.9

(0.38) (0.27) (0.17) (0.41) (0.28) (0.41) (0.16) (0.28) (0.18) (0.07)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
Exhibit 10.1

                      DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DATED 12/11/00
                           SECOND LETTER OF EXTENSION
                           --------------------------

1.       The term of the Distribution Agreement dated December 11, 2000 by and
between Codman and Shurtleff, Inc. and Valley Forge Scientific Corp.
("Distribution Agreement") has previously been extended until March 31, 2004.
Now the parties agree to extend the Distribution Agreement until June 30, 2004.

2.       The Minimum Dollar Purchase Obligations for the period from April 1,
2004 to June 30, 2004 shall be one million dollars ($1,000,000).

3.       Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Distribution Agreement.

4.       All other terms of the Distribution Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.


                                                Codman and Shurtleff, Inc.

Dated: March 3, 2004                        By: /s/ GLEN KASHUBA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Glen Kashuba, President


                                                Valley Forge Scientific Corp.

Dated: March 3, 2004                        By: /s/ JERRY L. MALIS
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jerry L. Malis, CEO

                                      -25-
#### TOWN OF SURFSIDE v. L'AIGLON.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
#### In the Matter of Gabriel Soto, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Jesus Soto, Respondent, v Brentwood Union Free School District, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 912]

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated August 27, 2001, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The Supreme Court erred in granting the petitioner leave to serve a late notice of claim. The petitioner failed to proffer an adequate explanation for the failure to serve a timely notice of claim, the Brentwood Union Free School District (hereinafter the District) did not acquire actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days after the claim arose or a reasonable time thereafter, and the delay would cause the District substantial prejudice in maintaining its defense on the merits *(see Matter of Sargent v New York City Hous. Auth.,*287 AD2d 638; *Kittredge v New York City Hous. Auth.,*275 AD2d 746). Furthermore, while infancy will automatically toll the one-year and 90-day statute of limitations for commencing an action against a municipality *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-i; CPLR 208), the “infancy of the injured petitioner, standing alone, did not compel the granting of an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim” *(Matter of Knightner v City of New York,*269 AD2d 397). It is incumbent upon the petitioner to show a nexus between the delay and the infancy. In the case at bar, there was no such *553showing (see *Matter of Cuffee v City of New York,*255 AD2d 440). Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART, 

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants. 

 

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT

The United States of America, by and through United States Attorney John F. Walsh and

Assistant United States Attorney Linda Kaufman, respectfully moves to restrict Document #90,

any order revealing the contents of that document, and the brief filed in support of this motion

(Doc. #89) for the reasons stated in the brief filed in support of this motion (Doc. 89). The

United States requests a “Level 3" Restriction which would make the document, any order

revealing the contents of that document and the brief filed in support of this motion, “Viewable

by Filer & Court” only. 

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 97 filed 07/03/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted this 3 day of July, 2012. rd

JOHN F. WALSH 

United States Attorney

By: s/Linda Kaufman 

LINDA KAUFMAN

Assistant U.S. Attorney

1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Telephone: (303) 454-0100

Fax: (303) 454-0404

E-mail: Linda.Kaufman@usdoj.gov

ATTORNEY FOR THE GOVERNMENT

2

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 97 filed 07/03/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 3 day of July, 2012, I electronically filed the rd

foregoing GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the

following e-mail addresses:

Martin Adam Stuart

Email: martinstuartlaw@solucian.com

William Lewis Taylor

Email: wltaylorpc@gmail.com

Ms. Paula M. Ray

Email: paulamray@earthlink.net

s/Michelle Trujillo 

MICHELLE TRUJILLO

Legal Assistant

United States Attorney’s Office

1225 17th Street, Suite 700

Denver, Colorado 80202

Phone: 303-454-0273

Fax: 303-454-0409

Michelle.Trujillo@usdoj.gov

3

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 97 filed 07/03/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 3