alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02229-WYD-KLM 

POWELL=S SWEET SHOPPE USA, LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROBERT EASTMAN and 

KATE EASTMAN, 

Defendants. 

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon review of the file. On September 

29, 2011, Defendants Robert and Kate Eastman (“the Eastmans”) filed a Suggestion of 

Bankruptcy (ECF No. 11) in this matter. The filing indicated that on September 16, 

2011, the Eastmans filed a Petition in Bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the United States 

Bankruptcy Code (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado, Case No. 

11-32019-MER). 

On September 30, 2011, I issued an Order to any interested party to show cause 

on or before October 31, 2011 as to why this matter should not be stayed pursuant to 

the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et. seq., and in accordance with 11 U.S.C. 

§ 362, the automatic stay provision. No responses were filed. 

Therefore, I find that this matter is subject to the automatic stay pursuant to 

11 U.S.C. § 362. Since the Eastman’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition is currently 

Case 1:11-cv-02229-WYD-KLM Document 14 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2- 

pending and the outcome of the bankruptcy case is uncertain, I find that this case 

should be administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 with leave to 

be reopened for good cause shown. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this action 

pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 with leave to be reopened for good cause shown. 

Dated: November 1, 2011 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

Wiley Y. Daniel 

Chief United States District Judge 

 

Case 1:11-cv-02229-WYD-KLM Document 14 Filed 11/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00921-CR

David Cepeda JONES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1994CR5367W

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 26, 2011

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on August 5, 1997. The notice 

of appeal was due to be filed on September 4, 1997. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal on November 30, 2010. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court 

of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). 

Because appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal, this appeal is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 
04-10-00921-CR

- 2 -

1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas 

corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending July 31, 2021

----

Personnel            Division of Consumer and Community Affairs -- appointment of Benjamin Olson as senior associate director.            -Approved, July 23, 2021            (A/C)                      Office of the Chief Data Officer -- appointment of Phillip Daher as associate director/deputy chief data officer.            -Announced, July 27, 2021            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
|   (1)  | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: October 27, 2010 | By:/s/ Ronald D. Croatti           Ronald D. Croatti, President and      Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer) |
The Attorney General of Texas 

September 

Honorable Bill M. White 

Crimiml Dbtrict Attorney 

Bexar County CZuuUwm 

San Antonio, Texm 78205 

12, 1980 

Opinbn No. Mw-241 

Bet Lagallty of ur~icwr pafarmed 

by dbtrict attomey’r off108 in 

collactian of hot dmoka 

Dear Hr. Whiter 

rat have nqwted our opinim u to wh8th8r a dbtriut attorney mry 

lawfully collect tnpaid dmckr ia p&ate persow The 6S~tiL$la~~ 

enacted artkla SLOB of the Code of Mm&ml PRXWIW, 

Lqblatwe, chapter 734, uction 1, at ISOl, whlah provid88 in pertinen~put3 

(a) A mmty attorney, dbtrict l ttomay, or arimiml 

dbtrict attorney may collect a fe8 if hb office 

collbata md pm ahckmdmilardght 

ordorifthedwkcrdmilard~tw4erz 

(Uha8bunb8u8dapau8dinamannerwhich 

make the brtunce Q paasirq an offmoe wlerr 

(AbcUar S2.4l, Penal codt; 

OS) se8ual SLOS, Paul cede; or 

m3acual SLOJ, Penal code; or 

(a) ha8 been forged wMer 8eatiar 32.24 Paml coda. 

The statute permit8 the dbtrict at&may to oollrt the fa8 .“from many puson 

who b a party dD the offans~,~ and utablbhw a maximum fee admdula 

bawd QI the f&w amamt of the &ok collected. Swtiocu (b), (CL 

Al-h aLher gublic offictab we ~ifically prohibited itom 

undertakiq “the collootion of any olakn fa debt far othws,” articlu 6252- 

l4, V.T.C.S., thr addltlon of rrticlo 58.00 to tha Code of Criniiml Roaedrre 

remova my d&t m to whether a county attorney, dbtrlct l ttomey Q 

criminl dbtriot attomey m 

Y 

do ID. It b thur our opinion Unt, punwtt to 

artiah53.05 of tJm Coda 0 Crlmlml Proaebe, a dbtrict l tto momay y 

hwfullyaaa?tulp8ldchooksfaprlvrkprronr 

p. 762 
Honorable Bill M. White - PegeTwo (NW-341) 

SUMMARY 

Pursuant to article 53.08 of the Code of Criminal Procedum, 

a district attorney may lawfully collect unpaid check8 for 

private persona 

MARK WHITE 

Attorney Cieneral of Terra 

JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. 

First Assistant Attorney General 

Prepared by Rick Gilpin 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMR’TEE 

C. Robert Heath, Chairman 

Jon Bible 

Welter Davis 

Susan Garrison 

Ride Gilpin 

P. 763
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christopher G. Fournier

v. Civil No. 08-cv-338-JD

Warden, Northern New Hampshire 

Correctional Facility

O R D E R

Christopher Fournier, a state prisoner, seeks habeas corpus

relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After preliminary review,

the court found that Fournier’s petition raised three cognizable

claims. See document no. 8. The Warden requests an extension of

time to file a motion for summary judgment. Fournier moves to

compel counsel to submit transcripts and to extend time to

respond to the Warden’s motion for summary judgment.

On February 23, 2009, Fournier filed a motion to expand the

record, asking that the court require the Warden to provide the

transcripts from a “Status of Counsel” hearing held on July 14,

2006, in Merrimack County superior court. The court granted

Fournier’s motion on March 16, 2009. By motion dated April 14,

2009, Fournier notes that the transcripts have not been submitted

and requests that the court compel the Warden to provide the

transcripts.

Case 1:08-cv-00338-JD Document 19 Filed 04/21/09 Page 1 of 3
2

On April 7, 2009, the Warden filed a motion to extend time

to file a summary judgment motion to April 10, 2009. Fournier

did not object to the Warden’s motion. The Warden filed a

summary judgment motion on April 10. Citing his need for the

July 14, 2006, transcripts, Fournier requests additional time to

respond to the Warden’s motion for summary judgment.

The court has already granted Fournier’s request to expand

the record, requiring the Warden to provide the transcripts from

the July 14, 2006, status of counsel hearing. The court orders

that the Warden submit these transcripts on or before May 4,

2009. Fournier will have thirty days from the receipt of the

transcripts to respond to the Warden’s summary judgment motion.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, Fournier’s motion (document no.

18) is granted, to the extent that the Warden is ordered to

submit the requested transcripts and Fournier will have thirty

days to respond to the summary judgment motion, as outlined

Case 1:08-cv-00338-JD Document 19 Filed 04/21/09 Page 2 of 3
3

above. The Warden’s motion to extend time (document no. 16) is

granted.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

April 21, 2009

cc: Christopher G. Fournier #68441, pro se

Stephen D. Fuller, Esquire

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esquire

Case 1:08-cv-00338-JD Document 19 Filed 04/21/09 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND ASAY,

SAMUEL VIDAL GOMEZ,

STACEY LYNN PARKIN f/k/a Stacey Lynn Spera,

JERRY LEE RHEA,

DENNIS GLENN COEN,

HEATH ALLEN RUSSO,

LOUIE GEORGE SCHIMPF,

QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation, and

QUALITY RESURFACING CO., n/k/a QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before Court on the Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal Without

Prejudice of Complaint Against Defendant Stacey Lynn Parkin f/k/a Stacey Lynn Spera

[Docket No. 33]. Plaintiff has agreed to the dismissal of plaintiff’s claims against Parkin

without prejudice. In exchange, Parkin has agreed to (1) voluntarily appear at

depositions, hearings, and trials in this case; (2) accept service by mail or electronic

transmission of notices or subpoenas issued by Plaintiff for testimony at depositions,

hearings, or trials; (3) waive the territorial limits on service contained in Rule 45 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable local rules with respect to such

notices and subpoenas, provided plaintiff reimburses defendant Parkin for travel and

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 41 Filed 11/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

lodging at a reasonable rate; and (4) consent to personal jurisdiction in any United

States District Court for purposes of enforcing any such subpoena. Wherefore, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Stacey Lynn Parkin are

dismissed without prejudice.

DATED November 2, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 41 Filed 11/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23

                                                             Page 67 of 69



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements No. 2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965, No. 333-41077,
No. 333-65995, and No. 333-78941 of Burlington Coat
Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our
report dated July 28, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended May 29, 1999.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

August 27, 1999

                                                              Page 68 of 69
|                    | 2009              | 2008   |
|-------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                    | First        | Second | Third  | Fourth | First  | Second | Third  | Fourth |
| Trade Price             |              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| High                    | $10.25            | $9.60  | $9.00 | $8.60 | $14.75 | $14.75 | $14.10 | $11.00 |
| Low                     | $  7.83 | $7.05  | $7.05 | $6.80 | $13.00 | $13.00 | $10.50 | $  8.00 |
|                    |              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                    | 2009              | 2008   |
|                    | First        | Second | Third  | Fourth | First  | Second | Third  | Fourth |
| Bid Price               |              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| High                    | $10.25            | $9.25  | $8.75 | $8.60 | $14.00 | $14.50 | $14.00 | $10.75 |
| Low                     | $  7.25 | $7.00  | $7.05 | $6.75 | $12.95 | $13.00 | $10.05 | $  7.10 |
|                    |              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Cash Dividends Declared | $0.00             | $0.24  | $0.12 | $0.12 | $0.17 | $0.17 | $0.17 | $0.17 |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending June 10, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0001023877
<NAME>                                   Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                         (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS LELAND FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor,

LIKENS, Educational Department,

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION 

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Marcus Freeman’s “Motion to 

Alter or Amend” this Court’s March 28, 2013 order (Doc. 198) to the extent it granted 

Defendant Woolston summary judgment on Freeman’s second claim for relief. (Doc. 

212.) The Court DENIES that motion.1

 

Having considered Freeman’s motion to alter or amend, as well as the previously 

filed summary judgment pleadings and the videotape of the December 14, 2010

incident, the Court is not persuaded that its order granting Defendant Woolston 

summary judgment on Freeman’s second claim was clearly in error. See Rodeman v. 

Foster, 767 F. Supp. 2d 1176, 1188-89 (D. Colo. 2011). Nor has Freeman directed the 

Court’s attention to any new evidence or legal authority that has emerged since the 

 1 Although the time for Defendant Woolston to respond to Freeman’s motion for 

reconsideration has not yet passed, the Court can “rule on a motion at any time after it 

is filed.” D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C). 

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 218 Filed 04/23/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Court granted Woolston summary judgment. See id. Therefore, the Court DENIES 

Freeman’s motion to alter and amend the Court’s summary judgment order. (Doc. 212.) 

Dated this 23rd day of April , 2013.

BY THE COURT:

s/ David M. Ebel

 

U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 218 Filed 04/23/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA08-62-000]

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

September 23, 2008.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on September 25, 2008, members of its staff will 
participate in a meeting to be conducted by the California Independent 
System Operator (CAISO) regarding the CAISO's transmission planning 
standards agreement. The information and documents for the meeting can 
be obtained from Judi Sanders, [email protected].
    Sponsored by the CAISO, this meeting is open to all market 
participants, and staff's participation is part of the Commission's 
ongoing outreach efforts. This meeting may discuss matters at issue in 
the above captioned docket.
    For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at 
[email protected]; (916) 294-0233 or Maury Kruth at 
[email protected], (916) 294-0275.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22860 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending August 27, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANCO CAM, S.A.U.                                                                                                       FBSEABanco CAM, S.A.U., Alicante, Spain, to establish an international branch office located in Miami, Florida.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableBANKIA, S.A.                                                                                                            FBSEABankia, S.A., Valencia, Spain,  to establish an international branch in Miami, Florida.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableBANKUNITED, INC.                                                                                                        4c8
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00062-CR 

Daniel Eugene Anderson 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 432nd District Court 

of Tarrant County (1331169D) 

September 22, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
(July 17, 2002)

#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; David J. Orticelli, Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 496]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991, was suspended by this Court’s order dated November 20, 1998, for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of section 468-a of the Judiciary Law (255 AD2d 827).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of section 468-a of the Judiciary Law and has paid the fees as required by the statute and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts. Petitioner Committee on Professional Standards does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted, and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
#### Bush et al. *v.*Hague.

(No. 24613

— Decided May 2, 1934.)

*Mr. Phil S. Bradford*and *Mr. Charles 8. Druggan,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Charles 8. Sheppard,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed on authority of *New York Central Rd. Co.*v. *City of Bucyrus,*126 Ohio St., 558, this court being of opinion that the plaintiffs in error are estopped to question the constitutionality of Section 6373-3(J), General Code.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Beyis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.