alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,891
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          44,026
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      8,590
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          12,878
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,539
<LOANS>                                         50,102
<ALLOWANCE>                                        853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,119
<DEPOSITS>                                      71,555
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,875
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                553
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,654
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,319)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  83,119
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,882
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,104
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   280
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,266
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,476
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,790
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (9)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    484
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       645
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.7
<LOANS-NON>                                          3
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   733
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      189
<RECOVERIES>                                       309
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  853
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               853
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            853
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 3735 W. Airline Hwy., Reserve, LA 70084, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 5, 2005. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-1060. 

      ( print page 7573)    
Dated: January 31, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

 [FR Doc. E8-2299 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
EXHIBIT 99.1

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Wilshire Financial Services Group Inc.

|Date: November 14, 2002 | /s/   STEPHEN P. GLENNON
|----------------------- | ------------------------
|                        | Stephen P. Glennon      
|                        | Chief Executive Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 174 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 878 

[Report No. 110–497] 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 

2764) making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2008, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendment 

to the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the 

Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department 

4 of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the 

5 fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:06 Dec 18, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR878.RH HR878

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 878 RH 

1 poses, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to con2 sider in the House, without intervention of any point of 

3 order except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, 

4 a motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on 

5 Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in 

6 the Senate amendment with each of the two House amend7 ments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

8 accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and 

9 the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall 

10 be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 

11 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

12 Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall 

13 be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption 

14 without intervening motion or demand for division of the 

15 question except that the question of adoption of the mo16 tion shall be divided between the two House amendments. 

17 SEC. 2. During consideration of the motion to concur 

18 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation 

19 of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further 

20 consideration of the motion to such time as may be des21 ignated by the Speaker. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 174 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 878 

[Report No. 110

–497] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the Senate 

purposes. year ending September 30, 2008, and for other operations, and related programs for the fiscal propriations for the Department of State, foreign amendment to the bill (H.R. 2764) making apDECEMBER 17, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 83.6 14.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008: Q1... 100.0 81.0 15.5 2.9 .5 .0 .0

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 991 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 991

 Recognizing the exceptional sacrifice of the 69th Infantry Regiment, 
  known as the Fighting 69th, in support of the Global War on Terror.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

 Mr. Israel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the exceptional sacrifice of the 69th Infantry Regiment, 
  known as the Fighting 69th, in support of the Global War on Terror.

Whereas the 69th Infantry Regiment, or the Fighting 69th, with citizen-soldiers 
        from Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, the Bronx, Staten Island, and Long 
        Island, has faithfully answered America's call to arms since its 
        formation in 1851;
Whereas the Fighting 69th was one of the first units to assist in the recovery 
        effort at the World Trade Center in New York following the September 11, 
        2001, terrorist attack, where they lost a comrade, a firefighter;
Whereas the 69th Infantry Regiment, while deployed to Iraq as ``Task Force 
        Wolfhound'', its first overseas combat since World War II, fought to 
        defend the city of Al Taji against al-Qaeda terrorists, protected Iraq's 
        first free elections, and secured the infamous ``Route Irish'', the most 
        dangerous road in Baghdad;
Whereas 19 members of the Fighting 69th were killed in action and over 78 were 
        wounded in Operation Wolfhound; and
Whereas the Fighting 69th has now served the Nation in 5 wars and over 20 
        campaigns, and Congress has awarded 6 members with the Congressional 
        Medal of Honor: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 69th Infantry Regiment, or the Fighting 
        69th, as one of the great regiments in American military 
        history;
            (2) recognizes that America owes a tremendous debt for the 
        exceptional service, patriotism, and fidelity of the soldiers 
        of the Fighting 69th;
            (3) recognizes that the Fighting 69th has continually 
        participated in the Global War on Terror since the attack on 
        September 11, 2001; and
            (4) acknowledges that as the 69th Infantry Regiment deploys 
        to Afghanistan to fight in the central front in the Global War 
        on Terror, that the proud traditions of the regiment will be 
        respected and that the sacrifices of one of America's most 
        storied combat units will not go unnoticed.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jimmy Cruz, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 709]

Application by the ap*555pellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 2, 1998 *(People v Cruz,*255 AD2d 332), affirming five judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, all rendered November 15, 1996, as amended November 25, 1996, and March 5, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Santucci, J.P., Florio, S. Miller, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending March 29, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodDELTA NATIONAL BANCORP                                                                                                  CICNotice by Toinette Rossi, Manteca, California, to retain in excess of 10 percent of Delta National  Bancorp, and thereby indirectly control its subsidiary, Delta Bank NA, both of Manteca, California.Newspaper: 04/16/2008Federal Register: Not availablePORTER MOUNTAIN III, LLLP                                                                                               4c8
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 82940 

FILE 

MAGNIFICO PLAYA, LLC, A NEVADA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; 

ARRIENDO ADVISORS, LTD., A 

NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY 

COMPANY; AND KRISTOPHER KENT, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MANAGING 

MEMBER, 

Petitioners, 

vs. 

THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE 

LYNNE K. SIMONS, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND 

AM-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This original petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or 

prohibition challenges several orders related to a district court's denial of a 

motion to dismiss in a contract and tort action. We are not persuaded that 

our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) 

(observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing 

such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 

674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is 

2- oluiciS" 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

161 I947A &gait, 
J. 

an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in 

determining whether to entertain a writ petition). We therefore, 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

, C.J. 

Parraguirre 

do 41-, J. 

Haraesty 

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge 

Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP/Reno 

Meruelo Group LLC 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) I 947A
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending June 23, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY, THE                                                                                            * 18CBryn Mawr Trust Company, Bryn Mawr, PA, to purchase the assets and assume the liabilities of First Bank of Delaware, Wilmington, DE.Newspaper: 07/14/2012Federal Register: Not applicableMALVERN BANCORP, INC                                                                                                    * SLHC Formation
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000081 27-MAY-2015 10:13 AM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-62-01-SM

Daniel Goldin,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Goldin’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

12). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of December 2008. Defendant

Goldin shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than October 14, 2008. 

On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for November 19, 2008

at 3:00 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on December 2, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. 

Case 1:08-cr-00062-SM Document 13 Filed 10/01/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 1, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00062-SM Document 13 Filed 10/01/08 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41065 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CONCEPTION TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-15-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Conception Torres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Torres has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
Case 1:11-cv-02184-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02184-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02184-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02184-LTB Document 3 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael White, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 924]

Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Harvey, J.), entered August 15, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1]) and burglary in the first degree (§ 140.30 [2]). By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that reversal is required because County Court failed to advise him at the time of his plea that he would be subject to postrelease supervision *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Shumway,*295 AD2d 916). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant further contends that the court erred in failing to specify a period of postrelease supervision at sentencing. Post-release supervision is mandatory for determinate sentences and is automatically included in the sentence *(see*Penal Law § 70.45 [1]; *People v Goss,*286 AD2d 180, 183). Where, as here, the court fails to specify a period of postrelease supervision, the period “shall be five years” (§ 70.45 [2]; *see People v Bloom,*269 AD2d 838, 838, *lv denied*94 NY2d 945). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, raised in both the main brief and the pro se supplemental brief, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Green, J.P., Hayes, Wisner, Burns and Lawton, JJ.