alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22974]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0232; OPM Form 1673]


Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request for Review of an 
Expiring Information Collection: Procedures for Submitting Compensation 
and Leave Claims

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) a request for review of an expiring information 
collection. This information collection, ``Procedures for Submitting 
Compensation and Leave Claims'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0232; OPM Form 
1673), is used to collect information from current and former Federal 
civilian employees who are submitting a claim for compensation and/or 
leave. OPM needs this information in order to adjudicate the claim.
    We received no comments on our 60-day notice on this information 
collection (OPM Form 1673), published in the Federal Register on June 
17, 2008.
    Approximately 80 claims are submitted annually. It takes 
approximately 60 minutes to complete the form. The annual estimated 
burden is 80 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Margaret A. Miller by 
telephone at (202) 606-2699, by FAX at (202) 418-3251, or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a173b283d3b283f2e74173336363f281a352a37743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0449657663657661702a496d68686176446b74692a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include a mailing address with your 
request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to:

Robert D. Hendler, Program Manager, Center for Merit Systems 
Compliance, Division for Human Capital Leadership and Merit System 
Compliance Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Room 6484, Washington, DC 20415; and
John W. Barkhamer, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Howard Weizmann,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. E8-22974 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-43-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Eric Dickner

v. Civil No. 07-cv-120-PB

NH Governor, et al

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated November 9, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

December 10, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Eric Dickner, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00120-PB Document 30 Filed 12/10/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 976 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 13, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5349) to extend the Protect America Act of 
2007 for 21 days. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill are 
waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on the Judiciary and 20 minutes equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 5349 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Adam H. Nagle

v. Civil No. 08-cv-445-JL

NH State Prison, Warden et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 24, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

January 14, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Adam H. Nagle, Pro se

Deborah B. Weissbard, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00445-JL Document 10 Filed 01/14/09 Page 1 of 1
#### Harold ELLIOTT, Appellant, v. DEIGAARD & PRESTON BUILDERS, Inc., Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Compan*y*and Florida Industrial Commission, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

March 16, 1954.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2008...... 13.8 9.5 12.3 9.1 30.6 21.7 9.2 11.1 12.6 14.6 2009...... 11.0 9.6 8.4 8.5 27.9 14.3 9.1 10.7 11.8 10.9 2006: Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0 2008: Q1... 13.9 10.7 15.9 9.7 38.0 20.2 9.1 12.2 13.6 14.3  Q2... 14.8 8.2 8.9 9.7 24.4 25.7 10.7 11.7 11.9 16.3  Q3... 14.8 8.6 13.2 9.2 34.6 22.5 9.0 11.1 13.9 15.6  Q4... 12.0 9.7 11.7 7.6 29.2 18.7 7.9 9.5 11.5 12.5 2009: Q1... 10.8 9.7 9.6 8.3 36.8 14.0 9.6 12.5 14.6 9.9  Q2... 11.8 12.6 7.5 9.8 31.7 14.6 10.0 11.9 12.6 11.7  Q3... 11.7 7.0 7.7 8.8 35.0 15.8 8.7 9.7 10.8 12.5  Q4... 9.8 9.5 8.8 7.4 15.9 13.2 8.0 8.7 8.9 10.4 2010: Q1... 10.9 9.2 8.4 9.6 24.9 12.2 9.5 10.6 11.8 10.7  Q2... 16.3 8.2 11.3 9.9 31.5 26.3 9.7 12.0 13.3 18.3  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### SEABOARD OIL CO. v. CHALK et al.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 27,1935.

Julian Hartridge, of Jacksonville, for plaintiff in error.

White & Colson, of Miami, for defendants In error.

PER CURIAM.

In the Seaboard Oil Co. v. Chalk, 112 Fla. 387, 150 So. 605, it was held that the. order vacating the order and judgment of nonsuit entered herein is analogous to an order granting a new trial. The statute section 4615 (2905), C. G. L., provides that when an order granting a new trial is reversed on writ of error, the appellate court “shall direct final judgment to be entered in the court below, for the party who had obtained the verdict in the court below, unless a motion in arrest of judgment, or for judgment non obstante veredicto, shall be made and prevail.’.’ If the order granting a new trial is affirmed on writ. of error, the cause is remanded for a new trial.

 In writs of error to an order grant-' ing a new trial, the statute requires the court ’ to “review the said order.” Section *46151*(2905), C. G. L. Assignments of error cannot' enlarge the scope of the review fixed by the statute in allowing a writ of error to an order granting a new trial. As a writ of error to an order vacating a judgment of nonsuit is allowed only because of its analogy to an order granting a new trial, the scope of the appellate review is similar to that of an order granting a new trial.

Motion to recall mandate denied.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q3... 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q4... 9.0 8.8 8.3

2007: Q1... 8.9 8.8 8.2

 Q2... 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 8.1 7.6

2008: Q1... 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q3... 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.4

 Q4... 9.2 8.9 8.3

2007: Q1... 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q2... 9.1 8.8 8.2

 Q3... 9.0 8.7 8.1

 Q4... 8.5 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... 7.4 7.2 6.7

 Q2... 7.1 6.9 6.6

 Q3... 7.0 6.9 6.5

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2006: Q3... 9.3 9.3 8.8

 Q4... 9.4 9.4 8.8

2007: Q1... 9.2 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.3

 Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.8

 Q4... 8.3 8.4 8.4

2008: Q1... 7.5 7.6 7.7

 Q2... 6.6 6.8 6.8

 Q3... 6.8 7.3 7.1

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.** § **1350)**




The
      undersigned, the chief financial officer of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.
      (the “Company”), certifies that to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 2007 (the “Annual Report”),
      which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
      all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





The
      foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and no person shall be
      entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any other purpose. The
      undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
      certification except as required by law.


Date:
              December 20, 2007
            
            /s/ Richard
              C. CogginsRichard
              C. CogginsChief
                Financial Officer
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 18, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         11,444
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,524
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          27,812
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,524
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (33,188)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,188)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (2.655)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.655)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21























































                                                               Page 113 of 118<PAGE>

              SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent
corporation of two hundred fifty subsidiaries which operate
"off-price" retail apparel stores in the United States.

Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation,
which buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in
connection with the Company's business.

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation, which leases the Company's store in Clifton Heights,
Pennsylvania to one of the Company's operating subsidiaries.

Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates
a wholesale apparel business.

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an
interest in a manufacturer of coats.

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company
collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade
names.

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, through which the
Company invests excess funds.

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company
provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of
their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.







                                                              Page 114 of 118<PAGE>



                                                             EXHIBIT 23





















                                                              






                                                               Page 115 of 118<PAGE>



INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
2-96332, No. 33-21569, No. 33-51965 and No. 33-61351 of Burlington Coat Factory
Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 of our report dated 
September 8, 1997, and appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation and subsidiaries for the year
ended June 28, 1997.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

September 26, 1997











                                         


                                           

                                                              Page 116 of 118<PAGE>
<PAGE>























                         [THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]


















                                                              Page 117 of 118<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-355-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. WAUNITA WEINGART, 

2. JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

3. ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendants. 

 

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW DOCUMENT #88, 

 GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENT

 

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Motion to Withdraw

Document #88, Government’s Motion To Restrict Document. Upon consideration and

for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that said Motion to Withdraw Document #88, is granted, and

that Document #88 is hereby withdrawn.

IT IS SO ORDERED on this _________ day of July, 2012.

_______________________________

THE HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 95-1 filed 07/02/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 1
Case 1:11-cv-02260-WYD Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02260-WYD Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02260-WYD Document 4 Filed 09/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Donna G. Steward, Respondent, v Clifford A. Steward, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 313]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of commitment of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated August 2, 2004, which upon, in effect, confirming a determination of the same court (Orlando, S.M.) dated July 12, 2004, finding, after a hearing, that he willfully failed to obey the child support provisions contained in the parties’ amended judgment of divorce dated August 11, 1999, and committed him to a period of incarceration of 90 days unless he purged himself of his contempt by paying the sum of $2,375.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as committed the father to a period of incarceration of 90 days is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of incarceration has expired; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

In August 1999 the father was ordered to pay support for his son. During a hearing pursuant to a violation petition, the evidence revealed that the father had failed to make support payments since July 23, 2003. Proof of the father’s failure to pay support as ordered constituted “prima facie evidence of a willful violation” (Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]) and shifted the burden to him to come forward with competent, credible evidence of his inability to make the support payments *(see Matter of Powers v Powers,*86 NY2d 63, 69-70 [1995]).

*715Although the father correctly contends that the Support Magistrate’s findings of fact, which were confirmed by the Family Court, contained certain errors in its recounting of testimony, we find, upon our independent factual review of the complete record *(see Matter of Allen v Black,*275 AD2d 207, 209 [2000]), that the father failed to carry his burden of responding adequately to the mother’s prima facie showing *(see Matter of Powers v Powers, supra).*

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Cozier, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

[DELOITTE LOGO]                                         SAMSON BELAIR/DELOITTE &
                                                        TOUCHE S.E.N.C.R.L.
                                                        1 Place Ville Marie
                                                        Suite 3000
                                                        Montreal QC H3B 4T9
                                                        Canada

                                                        Tel: (514) 393-7115
                                                        Fax: (514) 390-4113
                                                        www.deloitte.ca

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (registration Nos. 33-28296, 33-91824, 333-93063 and 333-6236)
pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan and Directors' Stock
Option Plan of our report dated February 25, 2004, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Campbell Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2003.

/s/ Samson Belair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Samson Belair/Deloitte & Touche s.e.n.c.r.l. Chartered Accountants

Montreal, Canada
May 19, 2004

                                                      Member of
                                                      Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu