alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
ACUSON CORPORATION                                              EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Acuson Corporation has the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:

1.      Acuson Pty. Ltd., organized under the laws of Australia.
2.      Acuson Belgium SA/NV, organized under the laws of Belgium.
3.      Acuson Canada Ltd., organized under the laws of Ontario, Canada.
4.      Acuson A/S, organized under the  laws of Denmark.
5.      Acuson OY, organized under the laws of Finland.
6.      Acuson S.A.R.L., organized under the laws of France.
7.      Acuson GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany.
8.      Acuson Hong Kong Ltd., organized under the laws of Hong Kong.
9.      Acuson S.p.A., organized under the laws of Italy.
10.     Acuson Nippon K.K., organized under the laws of Japan.
11.     Acuson Benelux BV, organized under the laws of the Netherlands.
12.     Acuson A/S, organized under the laws of Norway.
13.     Acuson Singapore Ltd., organized under the laws of Singapore.
14.     Acuson Iberica SA, organized under the laws of Spain. 
15.     Acuson AB, organized under the laws of Sweden.
16.     Acuson Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.
17.     Acuson Foreign Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the Virgin
        Islands.
18.     Acuson International Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of
        the State of California. 
19.     Acuson Worldwide Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the 
        State of California.
20.     Sound Technology, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of 
        Pennsylvania.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending May 26, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRST STATE BANK HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                        CICNotice by Mildred Stanley, Searsboro, Iowa, as trustee of the Warren Stanley Trust to retain control of 15.42 percent of First State Bank Holding Company, Lynnville, Iowa, and thereby indirectly First State Bank, Lynnville, Iowa.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 06/05/2012GNB BANK                                                                                                                * 18C
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF

J.A.V.,

A MINOR CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00181

- CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCM5797)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was no error in

the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It has been determined that Appellants are indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, this

Court makes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH OF JANUARY, 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, J., and McClure, C.J. ( Senior Judge )

McClure, C.J. ( Senior Judge ) (Sitting by Assignment)
| *Release Date: July 16, 2003* |
|-------------------------------|
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6**  **107**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DAQUAN TYREK BROWN, a/k/a Scutter, a/k/a Scutter P, a/k/a Keith Martin , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston
. Patrick Michael Duffy , Senior District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00472

- PMD

- 16 ; 2:14

- cv - 02515

- PMD )

Submitted : August 31, 2016 Decided: September 7, 2016

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Daquan Tyrek Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Daquan Tyrek Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabi lity. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003...... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005...... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

2006...... .7 .4 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2007...... .7 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2008...... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .8 .6 .1 .5

2009...... 1.8 .8 1.1 .1 1.0 3.1 1.3 1.8 .2 1.6

2002: Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004: Q1... 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5 3.0 1.3 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .7 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.3 1.2 1.1 .3 .9

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .3 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 1.1 .8 .2 .5

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .2 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q3... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .7 .4 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2007: Q1... 1.0 .6 .4 .1 .3 1.9 1.1 .8 .3 .5

 Q2... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .7 .9 .2 .7

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2008: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.7 1.0 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .2 .5

 Q3... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .8 .6 .1 .5

2009: Q1... 1.4 .7 .6 .2 .5 2.5 1.4 1.2 .3 .9

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.4 .9 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q3... 1.4 .6 .8 .1 .7 2.4 1.0 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q4... 1.8 .8 1.1 .1 1.0 3.1 1.3 1.8 .2 1.6

2010: Q1... 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1 3.8 1.5 2.4 .4 1.9

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1998
<CASH>                                       2,915,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,539,438
<PP&E>                                         290,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,183,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,725
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,912,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,183,464
<SALES>                                         47,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          183,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               979,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,023,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,023,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,023,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 869 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 13, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 69) making further 
continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived except 
those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the joint 
resolution are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of House Joint Resolution 69 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to such time as may 
be designated by the Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  The chairman of the Committee on Appropriations shall insert in the 
Congressional Record at any time during the remainder of the first session of 
the 110th Congress such material as he may deem explanatory of appropriations 
measures for the fiscal year 2008.
    Sec. 4.  House Resolution 839 and House Resolution 850 are laid upon the 
table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mohammed Kliti, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 715]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered December 17, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

“[T]o prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must demonstrate that he or she was deprived of a *569fair trial by less than meaningful representation; mere disagreement with strategies or tactics will not suffice” *(People v Cortez,*296 AD2d 465, 465 [2002]; see *People v Taylor,*1 NY3d 174, 176 [2003]). There must be an absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel’s conduct (see *People v Taylor, supra*at 176) which prejudiced the defense or the defendant’s right to a fair trial (see *People v Hobot,*84 NY2d 1021, 1024 [1995]).

Although the defense counsel failed to serve an alibi notice, the alibi testimony was nevertheless admitted in evidence (see *People v Lo Primo,*69 AD2d 890 [1979]).

Further, the defense counsel pursued a clear trial strategy, based upon the fact that the defendant was implicated by his accomplice and the sole evidence of the defendant’s identity as one of the perpetrators was a statement partially written in the investigating detective’s handwriting. The defense counsel introduced into evidence a second statement which was entirely in the detective’s handwriting. In that statement the defendant admitted to another crime for which he apparently was never charged. The second statement was admitted only after the court ascertained on the record that the admission of the second statement was part of the defendant’s trial strategy and the defendant and his father agreed to that strategy. In summation the defense counsel argued that “[my] client is guilty of signing statements. That’s all he’s guilty of doing.”

In view of the foregoing, it cannot be said that the defendant was deprived of meaningful representation. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 976 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 13, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

5349) to extend the Protect America Act of 2007 for 21 

days. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, 

with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

Judiciary and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion to 

recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5349 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2 

•HRES 976 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-02290-CMA-MEH Document 7 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
|August 7, 2007                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania
Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. R. 2131

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through fiscal year

2004, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS.

Section 805(a)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of

1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431c(a)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘major’’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO SUPPORT REDUCTION OF DEBT UNDER THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT

OF 1961 AND TITLE I OF THE AGRICULTURAL TRADE

DEVELOPMENT AND ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1954.

(a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 806 of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d) is amended by adding

at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS

AFTER FISCAL YEAR 2001.—For the cost (as defined in section

502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990) for the reduction

of any debt pursuant to this section or section 807, there are

authorized to be appropriated to the President the following:

‘‘(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.

‘‘(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

‘‘(3) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 808(a)(1)(D) of the

Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431f(a)(1)(D))

is amended by striking ‘‘to appropriated under sections 806(a)(2)

and 807(a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘to be appropriated under sections

806(a)(2), 807(a)(2), and 806(d)’’.

SEC. 3. CHAIRPERSON OF THE ENTERPRISE FOR THE AMERICAS

BOARD.

Section 811(b)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of

1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431i(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘from among

the representatives appointed under section 610(b)(1)(A) of such

Act or paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘and
H. R. 2131—2

shall be the representative from the Department of State appointed

under section 610(b)(1)(A) of such Act’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 853 

Honoring those who have volunteered to assist in the cleanup of the November 

7, 2007, oil spill in San Francisco Bay. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2007 

Ms. PELOSI (for herself, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mrs. TAUSCHER, 

Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. LEE, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. FARR, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. THOMPSON of California, and Mr. CUMMINGS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring those who have volunteered to assist in the cleanup 

of the November 7, 2007, oil spill in San Francisco Bay. 

Whereas the oil spill that occurred on November 7, 2007, in 

the San Francisco Bay resulted in the discharge of between 53,570 and 58,000 gallons of toxic bunker fuel, 

causing one of the Bay Area’s worse environmental disasters; 

Whereas 28 beaches were closed and over 1,300 birds so far 

have been severely impacted by the spill; 

Whereas thousands of individuals throughout the San Francisco Bay Area immediately volunteered to assist with the 

cleanup; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 853 IH 

Whereas Bay Area community non-profit organizations, such 

as San Francisco Connect, have also rallied to support 

the response and recovery work by supporting these volunteer efforts; 

Whereas Bay Area environmental organizations, such as 

Baykeeper, Save the Bay, and the Bay Institute, have 

provided invaluable leadership in reporting, assessing, 

and helping to remediate the damage to the Bay’s ecosystem; 

Whereas the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, members of the San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, commercial crabbers, and other Bay Area 

fishermen have all joined the cleanup efforts as well; and 

Whereas the city of San Francisco, particularly through its 

Department of Emergency Management, has significantly 

contributed to the overall response, bringing considerable 

resources to bear: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 those individuals and organizations who have volunteered 

3 to assist in the cleanup of the November 7, 2007, oil spill 

4 in one of our Nation’s most beloved national treasures, 

5 the San Francisco Bay. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1


 


Consent of Independent Auditors


 


We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the (a) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96569)
pertaining to the SBS Broadcasting SA 1992 Share Incentive Plan,  SBS Broadcasting SA 1994 Share Incentive
Plan, and Harry Sloan 1992 Stock Option Grant; (b) Registration Statement (Form
F-3 No. 333-13872), as amended, pertaining to the registration of common stock;
and (c) Registration Statement (Form S-8 
No. 333-8658) pertaining to the SBS Broadcasting SA 1992 Share Incentive
Plan,  SBS Broadcasting SA 1994 Share
Incentive Plan,  SBS Broadcasting SA
Long-Term Employees’ Stock Ownership Plan, SBS Broadcasting SA 1997 Senior
Management Incentive Compensation Plan 
and SBS Broadcasting SA Stock Option Exchange Plan of our report dated
February 20, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of SBS
Broadcasting S.A. included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Ernst
  & Young Accountants

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Amsterdam,
  The Netherlands

  	
   

  
	
  May 14, 2004
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE )

ASSOCIATION, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4082

)

DAVID A. LYNCH and NOELLE )

LYNCH, )

)

Appellees. )

)

)

Opinion filed October 19, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Cheryl K. Thomas 

Judge.

Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette,

P.A., Jacksonville; and Daniel A. Martinez

and Weslee Ferron of Martinez Denbo,

LLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Brent G. Steinberg, Brandon G. Cathey,

Stephanie Miles, and Dale Swope of 

Swope, Rodante P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 
- 2 -

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.