alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yanina Kachar et al., Appellants, v Yakov Berlin et al., Respondents.

[745 NYS2d 471]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated January 4, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion to vacate their default in appearing and answering.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

CPLR 5015 (a) (1) provides that a court may relieve a party from a judgment or order on the ground of excusable default if such a motion is made within one year after service of the judgment or order with written notice of entry. Here, it is undisputed that the defendants waited more than a year before they moved to vacate their default. In addition, it is well established that a party seeking to vacate a default in answering must make a showing of a justifiable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense. The defendants’ excuse of delay caused by their insurance carrier was insufficient to establish a justifiable excuse *(see Hazen v Bottiglieri,*286 AD2d 708; *see also Peters v Pickard,*143 AD2d 81). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Goldstein, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
## EXHIBIT 32

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof the Report), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wilshire
Financial Services Group Inc.

| | WILSHIRE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC.
| | --------------------------------------

|Date: August 12, 2003 | /s/   STEPHEN P. GLENNON   
|--------------------- | ---------------------------
|                      | Stephen P. Glennon         
|                      | Chief Executive Officer and
|                      | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Robert LaPenta, Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Robert LaPenta
Robert LaPenta
Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer )
August 27, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elaine M. Brown, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ELAINE M. BROWN    
|Elaine M. Brown        
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: December 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Integral Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Elaine M. Parfitt, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ Elaine M. Parfitt                    
|                                         
|Elaine M. Parfitt Chief Financial Officer



Date: December 12, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Hymes, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 905]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered October 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order of this Court, dated April 9, 2001, the appeal was held in abeyance and the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to hear and report on the prosecutor’s exercise of a peremptory challenge against a potential black juror *(People v Hymes,*282 AD2d 546). The Supreme Court has filed its report.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his *Batson*challenge *(see Batson v Kentucky,*476 US 79). The prosecutor advanced sufficient race-neutral *468reasons for exercising a peremptory challenge against the subject juror, and the burden then shifted to the defendant to prove that the peremptory challenge was used in a racially-discriminatory fashion *(see People v Payne,*88 NY2d 172). The defendant failed to satisfy his burden of proving that the explanations given by the prosecutor were pretextual *(see People v Payne, supra; see generally Hernandez v New York,*500 US 352, 364-365).

The defendant further contends that reversal is warranted because of improper comments made by the prosecutor during the opening statement and summation. Although some of the comments were improper, in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, any error was harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230). Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bovie Medical Corporation





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 333-195624 and 333-207206 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Numbers 333-200986 and 333-203422 on Form S-3 of Bovie Medical Corporation, of our report dated March 31, 2014, except for Note 19 as to which the date is May 8, 2014, on the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Bovie Medical Corporation, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K..








/s/ Kingery & Crouse, PA





Kingery & Crouse, PA


Tampa, Florida





October 31, 2016
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2005...... 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.7 7.5 7.1 6.5 2006...... 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 2007...... 8.3 8.6 8.3 8.5 8.5 7.6 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.0 2004: Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Q4... 5.5 5.5 5.2 6.0 5.5 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 5.1 2005: Q1... 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.9 5.7 7.3 6.9 6.9 6.4  Q2... 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.0 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q3... 6.7 6.9 6.8 7.1 6.9 5.8 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.3  Q4... 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7 6.7 8.3 8.1 7.7 7.1 2006: Q1... 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 7.3 8.5 8.5 8.2 7.8  Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.8  Q3... 8.6 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.3 9.3 9.2 8.7 8.4  Q4... 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 7.5 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.1 2007: Q1... 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.7 8.9 8.1 9.2 9.1 8.8 8.4  Q2... 8.6 9.0 8.5 8.9 8.7 7.9 9.2 9.1 8.9 8.4  Q3... 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.4 7.7 9.1 9.2 8.8 8.1  Q4... 7.7 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.1 6.9 8.6 8.5 8.3 7.4  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Ashley, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 408]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dora Irizarry, J.), rendered July 13, 2000, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 20 years with five years parole supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent that the sentence run concurrently with defendant’s service of three consecutive 10-year sentences for robbery convictions in Kings County, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly considered two Brooklyn robberies, of which defendant had already been convicted, in relation to the issue of identity. Those two robberies and the instant crime shared a sufficiently distinctive modus operand! as to render the Brooklyn crimes relevant to prove defendant’s identity *(see, People v Beam,*57 NY2d 241). Moreover, this evidence could not possibly have caused defendant any prejudice. The two robberies in question were included in defendant’s videotaped confession, in which he admitted committing a total of five Brooklyn robberies in addition to the instant robbery, and defendant specifically asked the trial court to review the entire videotape for the purpose of evaluating the voluntariness of his confession to the instant crime. Furthermore, evidence of one *340of the two Brooklyn crimes at issue was also properly admitted, without objection, on the additional ground that it provided an inextricable narrative as to how defendant came to be arrested and how the gun used in the instant crime was recovered by the police *(see, People v Till,*87 NY2d 835, 837). Finally, not only is the court in a nonjury trial presumed to have disregarded prejudicial aspects of evidence *(People v Moreno,*70 NY2d 403), but in this case the court specifically stated that it was not considering any of the Brooklyn crimes as evidence of criminal propensity *(see, People v Molloy,*282 AD2d 311, *lv denied*96 NY2d 922).

However, in the interest of justice, we see no reason to add to what is already effectively a 30-year sentence for defendant’s convictions in Kangs County. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.2

AWARENESS LETTER

August 31, 2006

Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp.

2727 Diehl Road

Naperville, Illinois 60563

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
of the unaudited interim financial information of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. and subsidiary for the periods ended July 29, 2006 and July 30, 2005, as indicated in our report dated August 31, 2006; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 29, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-92248, 333-98549, and 333-108222 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report
prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|Chicago, Illinois
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2007: Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

 Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

 Q4... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.2

2009: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.1

 Q2... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.2

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2007: Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

 Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 6.9 7.2 6.8

2009: Q1... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.8

 Q2... 7.0 7.1 7.0 7.0

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2007: Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q4... 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.9

2009: Q1... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q2... 6.9 6.6 6.6 6.9
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.6

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2007: Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 7.0 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.8 6.9

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.2 7.2

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1887 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1887

 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2001

 Mrs. Morella (for herself, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. 
Moran of Virginia, Mr. Platts, and Mrs. Mink of Hawaii) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Pension 
Adjustment Equity Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADJUSTMENTS IN PENSION BENEFITS FOR UNITED STATES 
              PARK POLICE AND UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNIFORMED 
              DIVISION ANNUITANTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 905 of the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act 
of 2000 (section 905 of title IX of division B of the Miscellaneous 
Appropriations Act, 2001, as enacted by reference in section 1(a)(4) of 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106-554)) is 
amended by striking subsection (f).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Law Enforcement Pay 
Equity Act of 2000.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    
    Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia 
  | Cleveland | Richmond 
  | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis 
  | Kansas City | Dallas 
  | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending January 15, 2022

---





## Personnel

|
|

Release dates | 
    Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions | 
    Actions under delegated authority
    Applications and reports received:Boston | 
    New York | 
    Philadelphia | 
    Cleveland | 
    Richmond | 
    AtlantaChicago | 
    St. Louis | 
    Minneapolis | 
    Kansas City | 
    Dallas | 
    San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact us
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2004 | /s/ Stephen D. Rubin                |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |    Stephen D. Rubin, |   |
|                    |  President                     |   |
|                    | (Principal Executive Officer)       |   |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROADRUNNER VIEDO INTERPRISE, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         212,024
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     36,237
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               402,363
<PP&E>                                      12,754,556
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,357,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,079,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          593,216
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    760,000
<COMMON>                                       117,130
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,108,777)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,079,260
<SALES>                                      1,770,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,724,836
<CGS>                                        1,576,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,575,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             388,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,292,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,292,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,292,040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>