UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C.   20549





FORM 10-Q/A





QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)


OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010                                                                                          Commission File Number 001-12629





NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
36-4128138(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
Identification No.)


120 Broadway, 27th  Floor, New York, NY 10271


(Address including zip code of principal executive offices)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 417-8000





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x    No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes o    No o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).





Large Accelerated Filer o                                                   Accelerated Filer o





Non-Accelerated Filer o                                                     Smaller Reporting Company x


I


ndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES o    NO x





As of May 14, 2010 there were 17,276,704 shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding.





Explanatory Note





We are filing this Amended Quarterly report on Form 10-Q/Ato our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 (the “Original Filing”) to amend and restate our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, as discussed in Note 3 to the accompanying restated unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  The Original Filing was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 17, 2010





Background of the Restatement





On June 10, 2010, the Company announced that an accounting review by its management and Audit Committee, with the assistance of its independent auditors, had revealed that certain revenues were overstated and certain operating expenses were understated in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010. Revenues were overstated by approximately 157,000 or 0.01%.  Operating expenses were overstated by approximately $15,000 or 0.0005%.  These errors related principally to over accruals of revenues, and over accruals of payables partly due to duplicative entries to accrue month end commission revenues on a trade date basis and a net overstatement of general accrued expenses including compensation expense, taxes, licenses and registration and other administrative expenses of one of our broker-dealer subsidiaries.  As a result of these errors, the Company announced that the previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 in the Company’s Forms 10-Q for those periods should no longer be relied upon (collectively, the “Affected Periods”).   This restatement reflects the appropriate portion of the correction in the first quarter of 2010, rather than in the second quarter.





The following items of this amended quarterly report on Form 10Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010 are amended and restated herein:





Part 1 Financial Information





Item 1 Financial Statements- Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Conditionas of March 31, 2010 , Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for theThree and Six Months Ended March 31, 2010,Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 ,Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements ;





Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Item 4 – Controls and Procedures.





Part II Other Information:





Item 6. Exhibits-  Exhibit 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2-  currently-dated certifications from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





The remaining Items are unaffected by the correction in errors, have not been update from the disclosure originally contained in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2010 [and are not reproduced in this Form 10-Q/A. This amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 does not modify or update the disclosures contained in the initial filing of the Form-Q for the same period nor does it cover reflect events occurring after May 17, 2010, other than as described above and to correct typographical errors contained therein.


2
  NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION


FORM 10-Q


QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010





INDEX


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1 – Financial StatementsUnaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Conditionas of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009
5Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for theThree and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
6Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for theThree and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
7Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditionand Results of Operations
27Item 3 – Quantitative & Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
36Item 4T – Controls and Procedures
37PART II – OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1 – Legal Proceedings
38Item 1a– Risk Factors
38Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
38Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
39Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
39Item 5 – Other Information
39Item 6 – Exhibits
39Signatures
40


3


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS





The following information provides cautionary statements under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act). We identify important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements we make in this report or in other documents that reference this report.  All statements that express or involve discussions as to: expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, identified through the use of words or phrases such as we or our management believes, expects, anticipates or hopes and words or phrases such as will result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimated, projection and outlook, and words of similar import) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking.  These forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic, competitive, regulatory, growth strategies, available financing and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and in the documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Many of these factors are beyond our control. Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this report or in other documents that reference this report. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results anticipated in the forward-looking information contained in this report or other documents that reference this report will, in fact, occur.





These forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties, and, accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements.  These uncertainties include, among others, the following: (i) the inability of our broker-dealer operations to operate profitably in the face of intense competition from larger full service and discount brokers; (ii) a general decrease in merger and acquisition activities and our potential inability to receive success fees as a result of transactions not being completed; (iii) increased competition from business development portals; (iv) technological changes; (v) our potential inability to implement our growth strategy through acquisitions or joint ventures; and (vi) our potential inability to secure additional debt or equity financing.





Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.  New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all of such factors, nor can our management assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.


4
  PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM I.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION(Restated)March 31,


September 30,ASSETS

2010


2009Current Assets

(unaudited)


(see note below)Cash

$
4,863,000


$
6,493,000Deposit with clearing organizations


1,186,000



1,212,000Receivables from broker dealers and clearing organizations


4,129,000



4,910,000Other receivables, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of$372,000 and $402,000 at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 respectively


567,000



332,000Advances to registered representatives - Current portion


1,244,000



1,784,000Securities owned: marketable – at market value


531,000



631,000Securities owned:nonmarketable – at fair value


99,000



60,000Total Current Assets


12,619,000



15,422,000Advances to registered representatives - Long term portion


594,000



1,096,000Fixed assets, net


1,127,000



1,163,000Secured demand note


500,000



500,000Intangible assets, net


2,018,000



2,329,000Other assets


1,306,000



1,132,000Total Assets

$
18,164,000


$
21,642,000LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent LaibilitiesPayable to broker dealers and clearing organizations

$
265,000


$
299,000Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at market


181,000



4,000Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities - Current portion


11,699,000



14,162,000Notes payable


500,000



500,000Total Current Liabilities


12,645,000



14,965,000Accrued expenses and other liabilities - Long term portion


708,000



719,000Convertible notes payable, net of debt discount of $839,000 and $1,036,000 atMarch 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 respectively


5,161,000



4,964,000Total Liabilities


18,514,000



20,648,000Subordinated borrowings


850,000



850,000Stockholders' EquityPreferred stock, $.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized; 50,000 sharesdesignated as Series A and 20,000 shares designated as Series B


-



-Series A 9% cumulative convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value, 50,000shares authorized; 46,050 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference:$4,605,000) at March 31, 2010 and  37,550 shares issued and outstanding(liquidation preference: $3,755,000) at September 30, 2009


-



-Series B 10% cumulative convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value, 20,000 sharesauthorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding (liquidation preference: $0at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively


-



-Common stock, $.02 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized;17,276,704 and 16,422,538 shares issued and outstanding,at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively


346,000



343,000Additional paid-in capital


41,939,000



41,195,000Accumulated deficit


(43,485,000
)


(41,394,000
)Total  Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)


(1,200,000
)


144,000Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

$
18,164,000


$
21,642,000Note: The balance sheet at September 30, 2009 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


5




NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(Unaudited)(Restated)





(Restated)-------- Three Months Ended ---------


-------- Six Months Ended ---------March 31,


March 31,


March 31,


March 31,2010


2009


2010


2009Revenues:Commissions

$
19,893,000


$
15,422,000


$
37,587,000


$
30,831,000Net dealer inventory gains


3,694,000



4,069,000



7,862,000



11,079,000Investment banking


1,386,000



482,000



3,039,000



1,149,000Total commission and fee revenues


24,973,000



19,973,000



48,488,000



43,059,000Interest and dividends


609,000



336,000



1,109,000



1,033,000Transfer fees and clearing services


1,854,000



2,108,000



4,760,000



4,271,000Other


1,458,000



1,344,000



2,863,000



2,663,000Total Revenues


28,894,000



23,761,000



57,220,000



51,026,000Expenses:Commissions


22,236,000



18,007,000



43,616,000



38,463,000Employee compensation and related expenses


3,087,000



3,037,000



6,140,000



6,044,000Clearing fees


(42,000
)


363,000



407,000



969,000Communications


981,000



1,031,000



2,001,000



1,893,000Occupancy and equipment costs


1,372,000



1,426,000



2,668,000



2,832,000Professional fees


862,000



607,000



1,367,000



1,370,000Interest


302,000



309,000



596,000



634,000Taxes, licenses, registration


404,000



342,000



863,000



602,000Other administrative expenses


736,000



566,000



1,267,000



1,289,000Total Expenses


29,938,000



25,688,000



58,925,000



54,096,000Net loss


(1,044,000
)


(1,927,000
)


(1,705,000
)


(3,070,000
)Preferred stock dividends


(95,000
)


(83,000
)


(193,000
)


(169,000
)Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$
(1,139,000
)

$
(2,010,000
)

$
(1,898,000
)

$
(3,239,000
)Net loss per common shareBasic:Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.12
)

$
(0.11
)

$
(0.20
)Diluted:Net loss attributable to common stockholders

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.12
)

$
(0.11
)

$
(0.20
)Weighted average number of shares outstandingBasic


17,200,315



16,421,538



17,175,742



16,421,538Diluted


17,200,315



16,421,538



17,175,742



16,421,538See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


6




NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(Unaudited)Six Months EndedMarch 31,2010


2009Cash flows from operating activities

(Restated)Net loss

$
(1,705,000
)

$
(3,070,000
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to netcash used in operating activitiesDepreciation and amortization


668,000



672,000Amortization of deferred financing costs


22,000



28,000Amortization of note discount


697,000



238,000Compensatory element of common stock options issuance


296,000



441,000Issuance of restricted stock


65,000



-Unrealized gain on securities owned


(150,000
)


-Changes in assets and liabilitiesDeposits with clearing organizations


25,000



(51,000
)Receivables from broker-dealers, clearing organizations and others


781,000



(60,000
)Other receivables


(235,000
)


(385,000
)Advances to registered representatives


1,042,000



610,000Securities owned: marketable, at market value


251,000



(1,152,000
)Securities owned: non-marketable, at fair value


(40,000
)


22,000Other assets


(196,000
)


(37,000
)Accounts payable and accrued expenses


(2,474,000
)


735,000Payable to broker dealers and clearing organizations


(34,000
)


(419,000
)Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at market


178,000



(52,000
)Net cash used in operating activities


(809,000
)


(2,480,000
)Cash flows from investing activitiesPurchase of fixed assets


(321,000
)


(343,000
)Net cash used in investing activities


(321,000
)


(343,000
)Cash flows from financing activitiesRepayment of notes payable


(500,000
)


(150,000
)Net cash used in provided by financing activities


(500,000
)


(150,000
)Net decrease in cash


(1,630,000
)


(2,973,000
)Cash balanceBeginning of the period


6,493,000



7,387,000End of the period

$
4,863,000


$
4,414,000Supplemental disclosures of cash flow informationCash paid during the period for:Interest

$
195,000


$
394,000Income taxes

$
-


$
56,000Supplemental disclosures of noncash financing activitiesPreferred stock dividends

$
387,000


$
676,000See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements


7




NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


MARCH 31, 2010


(UNAUDITED)





NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION





The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of National Holdings Corporation (“National” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required for annual financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  The condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2010 and for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 are unaudited.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the fiscal year.  These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.





NOTE 2. CONSOLIDATION





The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of National and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  National operates primarily through National Securities Corporation (“National Securities”), vFinance Investments, Inc. (“vFinance Investments”) and EquityStation, Inc. (“EquityStation”) (collectively, the “Broker Dealer Subsidiaries”).  The Broker Dealer Subsidiaries conduct a national securities brokerage business through its main offices in New York, New York, Boca Raton, Florida, and Seattle, Washington.




Through its Broker Dealer Subsidiaries, the Company offers (1) full service retail brokerage to approximately 45,000 high net worth and institutional clients, (2) provides investment banking, merger, acquisition and advisory services to micro, small and mid-cap high growth companies, and (3) engages in trading securities, including making markets in over 4,000 micro-cap, small-cap, NASDAQ and listed stocks and provides liquidity in the United States Treasury marketplace.  The Broker Dealer Subsidiaries are introducing brokers and clear all transactions through clearing organizations on a fully disclosed basis.  They are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") (formerly the National Association of Securities Dealers) and Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC").  vFinance Investments is also a member of the National Futures Association ("NFA").





In July 1994, National Securities formed a wholly owned subsidiary, National Asset Management, Inc., a Washington corporation ("NAM").  NAM is a federally-registered investment adviser providing asset management advisory services to high net worth clients for a fee based upon a percentage of assets managed.  In March 2008, all of the issued and outstanding stock of NAM was transferred from National Securities to National.  National formed a new wholly owned subsidiary, National Insurance Corporation, a Washington corporation (“National Insurance”) in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006.  National Insurance provides fixed insurance products to its clients, including life insurance, disability insurance, long term care insurance and fixed annuities.  National Insurance finalized certain requisite state registrations during the second quarter of fiscal year 2007 and commenced business operations that to date have been de minimus.  vFinance Lending Services, Inc. (“vFinance Lending”), originally formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of vFinance, Inc. was established in May 2002.  It is a mortgage lender focused primarily on the commercial sector, providing bridge loans and commercial mortgages through its nationwide network of lenders. Its operations to date have been de minimus.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.





8





NOTE 3.   RESTATEMENT OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS





On June 10, 2010, the Company’s management and the Audit Committee completed an internal accounting review and determined that the Company’s consolidated quarterly financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 previously filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods would be restated.





The accounting review revealed that certain revenues were overstated and certain operating expenses were understated in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010.  Revenues were overstated by approximately $157,000 and $219,000 for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010.  Operating expenses were overstated by approximately $15,000 and understated by approximately $113,000  for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 , respectively,   The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements were restated to correct certain errors related principally to over accruals of revenues, and under accruals of payables partly due to duplicative entries to accrue month end commission revenues on a trade date basis and a net understatement of general accrued expenses including compensation expense, taxes, licenses and registration and other administrative expenses of one of our broker dealers.  Included in the accompanying statement of operations are some reclassifications of revenues that have no impact on the financial performance of the Company.





As a result, the quarterly financial statements are revised as follows:





As of March 31, 2010, respectively, receivables from broker dealers and clearing organizations decreased from $4,348,000 to $4,129,000 and accounts payable, accrued payable and other liabilities- short term portion increased from $11,602,000 to 11,699,000.  For the three month and six month period ended March 31, 2010, the gross revenues will be revised from $29,051,000 to $28,894,000 and from $57,439,000 to $57,220,000. For the three month and six month period ended March 31, 2010, operating expenses decreased from $29,953,000  to $29,938,000 and increased from $58,828,000 to 58,925,000 and net loss increased from $902,000 to $1,044,000 and from $1,389,000 to $1,705,000.  Net loss per common share for the same periods increased from $0.06 to $0.07 and from $0.09 to $0.11 per share on a basic and fully diluted basis for the three month and six month period ended March 31, 2010. EBITDA, adjusted to exclude non-cash compensation expense and write down of forgivable loans, decreased from $593,000 to $453,000 and from $1,253,000 to $938,000.  The restatement has no effect on the cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities for the six-month period ended March 31, 2010.





NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES





Principles of Consolidation





The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of National and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.





Estimates





The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.





Reclassifications





Certain items in the 2009 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the 2010 financial statements.  Such reclassifications did not have a material impact on the presentation of the overall financial statements.





9




Revenue Recognition





The Company generally acts as an agent in executing customer orders to buy or sell listed and over-the-counter securities in which it may or may not make a market, and charges commissions based on the services the Company provides to its customers.  In executing customer orders to buy or sell a security in which the Company makes a market, the Company may sell to, or purchase from, customers at a price that is substantially equal to the current inter-dealer market price plus or minus a mark-up or mark-down.  The Company may also act as agent and execute a customer's purchase or sale order with another broker-dealer market-maker at the best inter-dealer market price available and charge a commission.  Mark-ups, mark-downs and commissions are generally priced competitively based on the services it provides to its customers.  In each instance the commission charges, mark-ups or mark-downs, are in compliance with guidelines established by FINRA.





Customer security transactions and the related commission income and expense are recorded on a trade date basis.  Customers who are financing their transaction on margin are charged interest.  The Company’s margin requirements are in accordance with the terms and conditions mandated by its clearing firms, National Financial Services LLC (“NFS”), Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“Penson”), Legent Clearing LLC (“Legent”), Fortis Securities, LLC (“Fortis”) and Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC. (“Rosenthal”).  The interest is billed on the average daily balance of the margin account.





Investment banking revenues include gains, losses, and fees, net of syndicate expenses, arising from securities offerings in which the Company acts as an underwriter or agent.  Investment banking revenues also include fees earned from providing financial advisory services. Investment banking management fees are recorded on the offering date, sales concessions on the settlement date, and underwriting fees at the time the underwriting is completed and the income is reasonably determinable.





Net trading profits result from mark-ups and mark-downs in securities transactions entered into for the account of the Company.  Some of these transactions may involve the Company taking a position in securities that may expose the company to losses.  Net trading profits are recorded on a trade date basis.





Clearing and other brokerage income are fees charged to the broker on customer’s security transactions and are recognized as of the trade date.





Other revenue consists primarily of investment advisory fees which are account management fees for high net worth clients.  These fees are determined based on a percentage of the customers assets under management, are billed quarterly and recognized when collected.





Cash and Cash Equivalents





The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.





Fixed Assets





Fixed assets are recorded at cost.  Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to five years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the terms of the leases.  Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; costs of major additions and betterments that extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized.  When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the costs and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss on disposal is recognized.





10





Income Taxes





The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using the effective tax rates in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.  A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is also recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset may not be realized.





Fair Value of Financial Instruments





The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximates fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.





Impairment of Long-Lived Assets





The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment at least once a year or earlier if circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recovered, in accordance with professional standards. In such circumstances, the Company will estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Future cash flows are the future cash inflows expected to be generated by an asset less the future outflows expected to be necessary to obtain those inflows. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company will recognize an impairment loss to adjust to the fair value of the asset.





Common Stock Purchase Warrants





The Company accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with capital financing transactions in accordance with professional standards for "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company's Own Stock".  In accordance with professional standards, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).  The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).





The Company assessed the classification of its derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2009, which consist of common stock purchase warrants, and determined that such derivatives are accounted for in accordance with professional standards.





Convertible Instruments





The Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in its convertible instruments in accordance with professional standards for “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”.





11





Professional standards generally provides three criteria that, if met, require companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments. These three criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.  Professional standards also provide an exception to this rule when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional as defined under professional standards as “The Meaning of “Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument”.





The Company accounts for convertible instruments (when it has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) in accordance with professional standards when “Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features,” as those professional standards pertain to “Certain Convertible Instruments.” Accordingly, the Company records, when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their earliest date of redemption. The Company also records when necessary deemed dividends for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in preferred shares based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note.





The Company evaluated the conversion option embedded in the convertible preferred stock and determined, in accordance with the provisions of these statements, that such conversion option does not meet the criteria requiring bifurcation of these instruments. The characteristics of the common stock that is issuable upon a holder’s exercise of the conversion option embedded in the convertible preferred stock are deemed to be clearly and closely related to the characteristics of the preferred shares.  Additionally, the Company’s conversion options, if free standing, would not be considered derivatives subject to the accounting guidelines prescribed in accordance with professional standards.





12





Net Income (Loss) per Common Share





Basic net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted.


Three Months EndedMarch 31,


March 31,2010


2009Numerator:Net loss

$
(1,044,000
)

$
(1,927,000
)Preferred stock dividends


(95,000
)


(83,000
)Numerator for basic earnings per share-net income (loss)attributable to common stockholders - as reported


(1,139,000
)


(2,010,000
) )Effect of dilutive securities:Series A preferred stock


-



-Numerator for diluted earnings per share-net income (loss)attributable to common stockholders - as adjusted

$
(1,139,000
)

$
(2,010,000
) )Denominator:Denominator for basic earnings per share--weightedaverage shares


17,200,315



16,421,538Effect of dilutive securities:Assumed conversion of Series A preferred stock


-



-Stock options


-



-Warrants


-



-Dilutive potential common shares


-



-Denominator for diluted earnings per share--adjustedweighted-average shares and assumed conversions


17,200,315



16,421,538Net loss available to common stockholdersBasic and diluted

$
(0.07
)

$
(0.12
)
 
 13
  Six Months EndedMarch 31,


March 31,2010


2009Numerator:Net loss

$
(1,705,000
)

$
(3,070,000
)Preferred stock dividends


(193,000
)


(169,000
)Numerator for basic earnings per share-net income (loss)attributable to common stockholders - as reported


(1,898,000
)


(3,239,000
) )Effect of dilutive securities:Series A preferred stock


-



-Numerator for diluted earnings per share-net income (loss)attributable to common stockholders - as adjusted

$
(1,898,000
)

$
(3,239,000
) )Denominator:Denominator for basic earnings per share--weightedaverage shares


17,175,742



16,421,538Effect of dilutive securities:Assumed conversion of Series A preferred stock


-



-Stock options


-



-Warrants


-



-Dilutive potential common shares


-



-Denominator for diluted earnings per share--adjustedweighted-average shares and assumed conversions


17,175,742



16,421,538Net loss available to common stockholdersBasic and diluted

$
(0.11
)

$
(0.20
)
 For the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010, 13,157,057 common share equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.  For the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2009, 15,289,999 common share equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.





The following table sets forth the common share equivalents that were excluded from the calculation for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:


Three Months EndedMarch 31, 2010


March 31, 2009Stock options


3,464,807



6,500,465Warrants


1,712,250



1,977,974Assumed conversion of:Series A Preferred Stock


4,605,000



3,436,560Notes


3,375,000



3,375,000Dilutive potential common shares


13,157,057



15,289,999
  14
  Stock-Based Compensation





Effective October 1, 2005, the Company adopted ASC Topic 718 accounting for “Share Based Payment.”  This topic addresses all forms of share based payment (“SBP”) awards including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights.  Under Topic 718, SBP awards will result in a charge to operations that will be measured at fair value on the awards grant date, based on the estimated number of awards expected to vest over the service period.   During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company did not grant any stock options.  Options granted by the Company, with to outside directors’ vest after six months. Most other options granted typically vest over four years and have a 5-year life and are exercisable at the closing share price on the date of grant.  A charge of approximately $113,000 and $237,000 was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and a charge of approximately $296,000 and $441,000 was recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, relating to the amortization of the fair value associated with all remaining stock option grants and restricted stock grants.





The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of the options granted.  The model includes subjective input assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimates.  The model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and that are fully transferable.  For example, the expected volatility is estimated based on the most recent historical period of time equal to the weighted average life of the options granted.  Options issued under the Company's option plans have characteristics that differ from traded options.  In management's opinion, this valuation model does not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.





A summary of the stock option activity as of March 31, 2010, and changes during the three month period then ended is presented below:


WeightedWeighted


AverageAverage


Remaining


AggregateExercise


Contractual


IntrinsicShares


Price


Term


ValueOutstanding at September 30, 2009


5,912,165


$
1.55



3.21


$
2,500Granted


300,000



0.69



4.51



-Terminated and Expired


957,275



1.32



1.43



-Outstanding at March 31, 2010


5,254,890


$
1.54



3.29


$
-Exerciseable at March 31, 2010


3,464,807


$
1.55



2.75


$
-


As of March 31, 2010, there was approximately $620,000 of total unrecognized deferred compensation costs related to share-based compensation arrangements.  The Company has experienced a historic forfeiture rate of approximately 26% on previously granted stock options and expects that future forfeitures will be consistent with this experience.


15
  A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of March 31, 2010, and changes during the six month period then ended is presented below:


WeightedAverageGrant DateNonvested Shares

Shares


Fair ValueNonvested at September 30, 2009


1,916,741


$
0.61Granted


300,000


$
0.47Vested


373,308


$
0.85Expired


53,350


$
0.33Nonvested at March 31, 2010


1,790,083


$
0.79
 
 Concentrations of Credit Risk





The Company is engaged in trading and providing a broad range of securities brokerage and investment services to a diverse group of retail and institutional clientele, as well as corporate finance and investment banking services to corporations and businesses.  Counterparties to the Company’s business activities include broker-dealers and clearing organizations, banks and other financial institutions.  The Company primarily uses clearing brokers to process transactions and maintain customer accounts on a fee basis for the Company.  The Company uses three clearing brokers for substantially all of its business.  The Company permits the clearing firms to extend credit to its clientele secured by cash and securities in the client’s account.  The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with the non-performance by its customers and counterparties in fulfilling their contractual obligations can be directly impacted by volatile or illiquid trading markets, which may impair the ability of customers and counterparties to satisfy their obligations to the Company.  The Company has agreed to indemnify the clearing brokers for losses they incur while extending credit to the Company’s clients.  It is the Company’s policy to review, as necessary, the credit standing of its customers and counterparty.  Amounts due from customers that are considered uncollectible by the clearing broker are charged back to the Company by the clearing broker when such amounts become determinable.  Upon notification of a charge back, such amounts, in total or in part, are then either (i) collected from the customers, (ii) charged to the broker initiating the transaction and included in other receivables in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition, and/or (iii) charged as an expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition, based on the particular facts and circumstances.





The Company maintains cash with major financial institutions.   All interest bearing accounts are insured up to $250,000.  On October 14, 2008 the FDIC announced its temporary Transaction Account Guarantee Program, which provides full coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts at FDIC-insured institutions that agree to participate in the program. The transaction account guarantee applies to all personal and business checking deposit accounts that do not earn interest at participating institutions. This unlimited insurance coverage is temporary and will remain in effect for participating institutions until June 30, 2010.  As a result of this coverage the Company believes it is not presently exposed to any significant credit risks for cash.





Other Receivables





The Company extends unsecured credit in the normal course of business to its registered representatives. The determination of the amount of uncollectible accounts is based on the amount of credit extended and the length of time each receivable has been outstanding, as it relates to each individual registered representative.  The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the amount of loss that can be reasonably estimated by management, and is included in other expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.





16





Advances to Registered Representatives





Advances are given to certain registered representatives as an incentive for their affiliation with the Broker Dealer Subsidiaries.  The representative signs an independent contractor agreement with the Broker Dealer Subsidiaries for a specified term, typically a three-year period.  The advance is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the broker’s agreement with the Broker Dealer Subsidiaries, and is included in commission expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  In the event a representative’s affiliation terminates prior to the fulfillment of their contract, the representative is required to repay the unamortized balance.





Securities Owned





Marketable securities which consist of publicly traded unrestricted common stock and bonds are valued at the closing price on the valuation date.  Non-marketable securities which consist partly of restricted common stock and of non-tradable warrants exercisable into freely trading common stock of public companies are carried at fair value as determined in good faith by management.





Other Assets





Other assets consist primarily of prepaid expenses and lease deposits.





Legal and Other Contingencies





The outcomes of legal proceedings and claims brought against us are subject to significant uncertainty. SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, requires that an estimated loss from a loss contingency such as a legal proceeding or claim should be accrued by a charge to income if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure of a contingency is required if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred. In determining whether a loss should be accrued we evaluate, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact our results of operations, financial position, or our cash flows.





Recent Accounting Pronouncements





In addition to those pronouncements shown below, other pronouncements may have been issued but deemed by management to be outside the scope of relevance to the Company.





In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.” This ASU establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities. This ASU provides amendments to the criteria for separating deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this ASU also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The amendments also require providing information about the significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and about how the application of the relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new ASU.




17





In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, “Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements.” This ASU changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements that are “essential to the functionality,” and scopes these products out of current software revenue guidance. The new guidance will include factors to help companies determine what software elements are considered “essential to the functionality.” The amendments will now subject software-enabled products to other revenue guidance and disclosure requirements, such as guidance surrounding revenue arrangements with multiple-deliverables. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new ASU.





In November 2009, the FASB issued an ASU regarding accounting for stock dividends, including distributions to shareholders with components of stock and cash. This ASU clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that contains components of cash and stock and allows shareholders to select their preferred form of the distribution (with a limit on the amount of cash that will be distributed in total) should be considered a stock dividend and included in EPS calculations as a share issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





In December 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The amendments in this Accounting Standards Update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.





In December 2009, FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). The amendments in this Accounting Standards Update replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which reporting entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The amendments in this Update also require additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement in variable interest entities, which will enhance the information provided to users of financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.





In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-01- Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. The amendments in this Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





18





In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-02 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in another entity.  The amendments in this update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” If an entity has previously adopted SFAS No. 160 as of the date the amendments in this update are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this update are effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted SFAS No. 160. The adoption of this ASU did not have any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.





In January 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 – Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosure as follows: 1) Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2.  A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.  2)  Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarifies existing disclosures as follows: 1) Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities. 2) Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. These disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, the Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.





NOTE 4. CLEARING AGREEMENTS





In April 2005, National Securities entered into a clearing agreement with NFS that became effective in June 2005.  In the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, NFS paid National Securities a $750,000 general business credit that is being amortized over an eight year period ending November 2014, corresponding with the expiration date of the clearing agreement.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, NFS provided National Securities a $250,000 clearing fee waiver that was amortized over a two year period ended December 2008, corresponding with the time period that certain performance standards were to be achieved.  The clearing agreement includes a termination fee if National Securities terminates the agreement without cause. The Broker Dealer Subsidiaries currently have clearing agreements with NFS, Penson, Legent, Fortis and Rosenthal.  The Company believes that the overall effect of its clearing relationships has been beneficial to the Company’s cost structure, liquidity and capital resources.





19





On February 1, 2010, National Securities Corporation and vFinance Investments, Inc. entered into separate but coterminous clearing agreements with National Financial Services, LLC.  NFS remains our primary clearing firm, and as a result of these agreements, National Securities Corporation’s existing agreement, which was not due to expire until April 2013, has been terminated and is replaced by this new agreement with a termination date of February 1, 2015.  vFinance Investments, Inc. clearing agreement ended on March 14, 2009, but the Company has been operating under that agreement while negotiating this new agreement.  The Company expects these new agreements to have a favorable effect on its clearing costs.





NOTE 5. BROKER-DEALERS AND CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES





At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the receivables of $4,129,000 and $4,910,000, respectively, from broker-dealers and clearing organizations represent net amounts due for fees and commissions.  At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the amounts payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations of $265,000 and $299,000, respectively, represent amounts owed to clearing firms or other broker dealers for fees on transactions and payables to other broker dealers associated with tri-party clearing agreements.





NOTE 6. SECURITIES OWNED AND SECURITIES SOLD, BUT NOT YET PURCHASED





The following table shows the quoted market values of securities owned by the Company, and securities sold but not yet purchased by the Company, as of March 31, 2010:




Securities


Securities sold, butowned


not yet purchasedCorporate stocks

$
112,000


$
15,000Corporate bonds


12,000



-Government obligations


407,000



166,000Non-marketable securities


99,000



-$
630,000


$
181,000
 
 The following table shows the quoted market values of securities owned by the Company, and securities sold but not yet purchased by the Company, as of September 30, 2009:


Securities


Securities sold, butowned


not yet purchasedCorporate stocks

$
86,000


$
4,000Corporate bonds


3,000



-Government obligations


542,000



-Non-marketable securities


60,000



-$
691,000


$
4,000
 20
  Fair Value Measurements





Securities owned at Fair Value as of March 31, 2010


Securities owned at fair valueLevel 1


Level 2


Level 3


TotalCorporate stocks

$
112,000


$
-


$
-


$
112,000Corporate bonds


12,000



-



-



12,000Government obligations


407,000



-



-



407,000Non-marketable securities


-



99,000



-



99,000$
531,000


$
99,000


$
-


$
630,000
  Securities owned at Fair Value as of September 30, 2009




Securities owned at fair valueLevel 1


Level 2


Level 3


TotalCorporate stocks

$
86,000


$
-


$
-


$
86,000Corporate bonds


3,000



-



-



3,000Government obligations


542,000



-



-



542,000Non-marketable securities


-



60,000



-



60,000$
631,000


$
60,000


$
-


$
691,000
 
 Securities sold, but not yet purchased at Fair Value as of March 31, 2010


Securities sold, butnot yet purchased at fair value

Level 1


Level 2


Level 3


TotalCorporate stocks

$
15,000


$
-


$
-


$
15,000Corporate bonds


-



-



-



-Government obligations


166,000



-



-



166,000$
181,000


$
-


$
-


$
181,000
 
 Securities sold, but not yet purchased at Fair Value as of September 30, 2009


Securities sold, butnot yet purchased at fair value

Level 1


Level 2


Level 3


TotalCorporate stocks

$
4,000


$
-


$
-


$
4,000Corporate bonds


-



-



-



-Government obligations


-



-



-



-$
4,000


$
-


$
-


$
4,000
 21
  NOTE 7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS





To determine the fair value of the intangible assets, the Company used the guidance provided by professional standards defining Fair Value Measurements.   These professional standards provide a fair value hierarchy which gives priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  There is no active market for assets identical to the Company’s acquired customer relationships nor has the Company been able to identify, as defined.  Additionally, the Company was unable to identify the following Level 2 inputs:  1) quoted prices for similar assets in active markets, 2) quoted prices for similar or identical assets in markets that are not active, or 3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset.  Accordingly, the Company used mostly unobservable inputs, consisting of estimated future net cash flows generated specifically from the acquired customer relationships.  However, the Company did use certain Level 1 and 2 inputs to substantiate certain assumptions that helped determine the discount rate it used in deriving the fair value of the intangible assets.





Amortization of the Company’s intangible asset for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2010 was $155,000 and $311,000, respectively, and amortization of the Company’s intangible asset for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2009 was $155,000 and $311,000, respectively.





NOTE 8. OTHER ASSETS





Other assets as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, consist of the following:


March 31, 2010


September 30, 2009Pre-paid expenses

$
853,000


$
659,000Deposits


190,000



184,000Investments in unaffiliated entity


162,000



162,000Deferred financing costs


93,000



114,000Other


8,000



13,000Total

$
1,306,000


$
1,132,000
  NOTE 9. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES





Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, consist of the following:


March 31, 2010


September 30, 2009Commissions payable

$
6,814,000


$
7,745,000Deferred clearing fee credits


161,000



484,000Telecommunications vendors payable


70,000



82,000Legal payable


465,000



663,000Deferred rent payable


376,000



140,000Accrued compensation


781,000



757,000Capital lease liability


598,000



703,000Other vendors


3,142,000



4,307,000Total

$
12,407,000


$
14,881,000
  22
 
 NOTE 10. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE





On March 31, 2008, the Company completed a financing transaction under which an investor made an investment in the Company by purchasing a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $3.0 million, with a warrant to purchase 375,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  The promissory note matures in March 2012, is convertible into common stock at a price of $2.00 per share and has a stated interest rate of 10% per annum.  Using professional standards, the relative fair value of the warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model.  The Company also recorded an additional debt discount for the beneficial conversion feature of the instrument.  These amounts, totaling approximately $791,000, have been recorded as a debt discount that will be charged to interest expense over the life of the promissory note.





On June 30, 2008, the Company completed a financing transaction under which the same investor made an additional investment in the Company by purchasing a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $3.0 million, with a warrant to purchase 468,750 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share.  The promissory note matures in June 2012, is convertible into common stock at a price of $1.60 per share and has a stated interest rate of 10% per annum.  Under professional standards, the relative fair value of the warrant was calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model.  The Company also recorded an additional debt discount for the beneficial conversion feature of the instrument.  These amounts, totaling approximately $789,000, have been recorded as a debt discount that will be charged to interest expense over the life of the promissory note.





The following table summarizes convertible notes payable at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009:


March 31,


September 30,2010


200910% convertible notes payable

$
6,000,000


$
6,000,000Less: Debt discount


(839,000
)


(1,036,000
)$
5,161,000


$
4,964,000
 
 The Company incurred interest expense related to its convertible notes of approximately $148,000 and $299,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively.




NOTE 11. NOTES PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY





In February 2007, the Company completed a financing transaction under which certain investors purchased 10% promissory notes in the principal amount of $1.0 million, with warrants to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.40 per share.  The promissory notes matured in February 2009, and had a stated interest rate of 10% per annum.  The Company obtained forbearance agreements from the lenders and as a result, re-priced some of the warrants down to an exercise price of $0.75 per share.  The Company recalculated the fair value of the warrants and took an incremental charge of approximately $46,000 recorded as interest expense, in accordance with professional standards.




During 2009 the Company repaid $500,000 of the notes payable and the other $500,000 has been extended to a new maturity of June 2010 at a reduced interest rate of 7%.  The Company has fully amortized the debt discount associated with these notes and an expense of $41,000 was charged to interest expense in 2009.  Such amortization had been included in “Interest” in previous years, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


23
  The following table summarizes notes payable at March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009:


March 31,


September 30,2010


20097% promissory notes payable

$
500,000


$
500,000$
500,000


$
500,000
  This note outstanding on March 31, 2010 matures in June 2010.  This indebtedness is owned by Christopher Dewey, who serves as a member of our Board of Directors.  The Company incurred interest expense related to its note of approximately $9,000 and $17,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, and approximately $12,000 and $24,000 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively.





NOTE 12. SECURED DEMAND NOTE / SUBORDINATED BORROWINGS





Subordinated borrowings represent a secured demand note that was entered into by National Securities, a registered broker-dealer.  The secured demand note was entered into in accordance with the form prescribed by the FINRA, and it is accounted for in accordance with broker-dealer accounting SEC rule 15c3-1d. Accordingly, our balance sheet includes both an asset (“Secured demand note”) and the corresponding liability (“Subordinated borrowings”) in an identical amount.  The secured demand note is available to compute net capital under SEC rule 15c3-1.  The borrowings are subordinated to the claims of present and future creditors of the Company and cannot be repaid where such repayment will cause the Company to fail to meet its minimum net capital requirements in accordance with SEC rule 15c3-1.





National Securities entered into a secured demand note collateral agreement with an employee of National Securities and a former Director of the Company, to borrow securities that can be used by the Company for collateral agreements.  These securities have been pledged through an unrelated broker-dealer, and have a borrowing value totaling $500,000.  This note bears interest at 5% per annum with interest paid monthly. In fiscal year 2009, upon the maturity of the aforementioned note, the lender opted to not renew the note and as such, the note is presently in “Suspended Repayment” status, as defined in the original note.    Certain of the


securities, totaling $168,000, have been pledged as collateral for security deposits for office leases under two letters of credit.  No amounts have been drawn on either of these letters of credit.  The holder also entered into a warrant agreement to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.25 per share.  This warrant expires on July 31, 2010.





In June 2009, National Securities was approved by the FINRA to receive a Subordinated loan from Legent for $100,000.  This loan was granted subsequent to National Securities signing a clearing agreement with Legent to clear a portion of the business.  This loan is forgivable after one year and National Securities bringing over a certain number of assets to the Legent clearing platform.





In July 2009, National Securities was approved by the FINRA to receive an additional Subordinated loan from Legent for $250,000, also bearing interest at the rate of 4.5% payable monthly.  This loan was granted subsequent to National Securities signing a clearing agreement with Legent to clear a portion of the business.  This loan is scheduled to begin principal repayment at a minimum of $10,000 per month or $10 per transaction, whichever is greater, starting July 31, 2010.  Some or all of this repayment may be funded by transactional credits depending on the amount of business conducted through Legent on a monthly basis.





24





NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES





During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there were no significant developments in the Company’s legal proceedings.  For a detailed discussion of the Company’s legal proceedings, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.





The Company’s subsidiaries are defendants in various arbitrations and administrative proceedings, lawsuits and claims together alleging damages of approximately $9,500,000.  Additionally, the Company has been named in two class actions lawsuits which have no specific damages alleged, and the Company is in the process of determining its exposure in these matters.  The Company believes all such claims are substantially without merit and estimates, to the extent that it can, that its aggregate liability from these pending actions is less than $900,000 (exclusive of fees, costs and unspecified punitive damages related to certain claims and inclusive of expected insurance coverage).  The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in these actions, and believes that the eventual outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.  However, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined at this time.  The amounts related to such matters that are reasonably estimable and which have been accrued at March 31, 2010 and 2009, is $225,000 and $135,000 (primarily legal fees), respectively, and have been included in “Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition.  The Company has included in "Professional fees" litigation and FINRA related expenses of $157,000 and $164,000 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $344,000 and $347,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.





NOTE 14. DIVIDENDS ON CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK





The holders of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock, that are convertible into the Company’s common stock at $1.25 per share, are entitled to receive dividends on a quarterly basis at a rate of 9% per annum, per share.  Such dividends are cumulative and accumulate whether or not declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, but are payable only when and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors.  In the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010, the Company accumulated $95,000 and $193,000, respectively, of dividends on its Series A preferred stock.  In March 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared an in-kind dividend in the aggregate of 3,093 shares of Series A preferred stock, in payment of approximately $387,000 of dividends accrued through March 31, 2010.  At March 31, 2010, the accumulated dividend on the Company’s 46,050 issued and outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock was $0.





NOTE 15. NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS





National Securities, as a registered broker-dealer, is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 that requires the maintenance of minimum net capital.  National Securities has elected to use the alternative standard method permitted by the rule.  This requires that National Securities maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or a specified amount per security based on the bid price of each security for which National Securities is a market maker.  At March 31, 2010, National Securities had net capital of approximately $437,000 which exceeded its requirement by approximately $187,000.





In addition to the net capital requirements, each of vFinance Investments and EquityStation are required to maintain a ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital, as defined, of not more than 15 to 1 (and the rule of the “applicable” exchange also provides that equity capital may not be withdrawn or cash dividends paid if the resulting net capital ratio would exceed 10 to 1).  At March 31, 2010, vFinance Investments had net capital of approximately $900,000 which was approximately $100,000 under the minimum required net capital of $1,000,000 and its percentage of aggregate indebtedness to net capital was 633%.  At March 31, 2010, EquityStation had net capital of approximately $243,000 which was approximately $143,000 in excess of its required net capital of $100,000 and its percentage of aggregate indebtedness to net capital was 115%.  Each of the Broker Dealer subsidiaries qualifies under the exemptive provisions of Rule 15c3-3 under Section (k)(2)(ii) of the Rule, as none of them carry the accounts of their customers on their books nor perform custodial functions related to customer securities.





25





Advances, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals from its broker dealer subsidiaries are restricted by the regulations of the SEC, and other regulatory agencies.  These regulatory restrictions may limit the amounts that a subsidiary may dividend or advance to the Company.





NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS





The Company has evaluated subsequent events through May 15, 2010 , which is the date the financial statements were issued, and has concluded that no such events or transactions took place which would require disclosure herein.





26





ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND





The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements.  This Quarterly Report may contain certain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or future business performance.  Any such statements that refer to the Company’s estimated or anticipated future results or other non-historical facts are forward-looking and reflect the Company’s current perspective of existing trends and information.  These statements involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified and, consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2009.  Any forward-looking statements contained in or incorporated into this Quarterly Report speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report.  The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.





OVERVIEW





We are engaged in investment banking, equity research, institutional sales and trading, independent brokerage and advisory services and asset management services through our principal subsidiaries, National Securities Corporation (“National Securities”), vFinance Investments, Inc. (“vFinance Investments”) and EquityStation, Inc. (“EquityStation”, and collectively with National Securities and vFinance Investments, the “Broker Dealer Subsidiaries”). We are committed to establishing a significant presence in the financial services industry by meeting the varying investment needs of our retail, corporate and institutional clients.




Each of the Broker Dealer Subsidiaries is subject to regulation by, among others, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) and is a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”).  vFinance Investments is also subject to regulation by the National Futures Association (“NFA”). In addition, each of the Broker Dealer Subsidiaries is licensed to conduct its brokerage activities in all 50 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, with vFinance Investments also being licensed in the U.S. Virgin Islands.




As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately 919 associated personnel serving retail and institutional customers, trading and investment banking clients. With the exception of our New York, New Jersey, Florida, Washington and Illinois branches, our approximately 107 other registered offices are owned and operated by independent owners who maintain all appropriate licenses and are responsible for all office overhead and expenses. Because these independent operators, many of whom are financial planners, are required to pay their own expenses, we generally pay them a much greater percentage of the commissions and fee income they generate, typically 70% - 90%.




Our registered representatives offer a broad range of investment products and services. These products and services allow us to generate both commissions (from transactions in securities and other investment products) and fee income (for providing investment advisory services, namely managing a client’s account). The investment products and services offered include but are not limited to stocks, bonds, mutual funds, annuities, insurance, and managed money accounts.




Business Environment in the Second Fiscal Quarter of 2010




The financial markets remained volatile during the second quarter of our fiscal year, as international markets took their first steps in unwinding fiscal stimulus programs, coupled with uncertainties related to the European markets stemming from the Greek debt crisis. However, continued improvement in the U.S. economy and stronger than expected corporate earnings ultimately led to improvements in the stock markets with the Dow Jones and S&P rising approximately 4%-5% in the quarter. In addition, M&A markets have begun to rebound, although the extent and timing of a significant rise in transactions is uncertain.




27





While the financial markets remained strong during this quarter, instability in the financial markets remain due to uncertainties related to bank regulation, the Federal Reserve’s plans to end its various economic stimulus programs and risks of inflation which may lead to higher interest rates. The potential tightening of credit and proposed reforms to regulation of banks and other financial institutions will have an unknown impact on the markets.




The results of our operations during the second quarter of 2010 have benefitted as a result of the continued rally in the financial markets. As these results are highly dependent on the environment in which our businesses operate, our quarterly results may not necessarily be indicative of what may be recognized in the future.





GrowthStrategy





We continue to evaluate opportunities to grow our businesses, including potential acquisitions or mergers with other securities, investment banking and investment advisory firms, and by adding to our base of independent representatives organically.These acquisitions may involve payments of material amounts of cash, the incurrence of a significant amount of debt or the issuance of significant amounts of our equity securities, which may be dilutive to our existing shareholders and/or may increase our leverage. We cannot assure you that we will be able to consummate any such potential acquisitions at all or on terms acceptable to us or, if we do, that any acquired business will be profitable. There is also a risk that we will not be able to successfully integrate acquired businesses into our existing business and operations.





Key Indicators of Financial Performance for Management





Management periodically reviews and analyzes our financial performance across a number of measurable factors considered to be particularly useful in understanding and managing our business. Key metrics in this process include productivity and practice diversification of representatives, top line commission and advisory services revenues, gross margins, operating expenses, legal costs, taxes and earnings per share.





28





RESULTS OF OPERATIONS





Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009





The Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2010 resulted in an increase in revenues, with a lower increase in expenses compared to the same period last year.  As a result, the Company reported a net loss of $1,044,000 compared with a net loss of $1,927,000 for the second quarters of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Three Months EndedMarch 31,


Increase (Decrease)2010


2009


Amount


PercentCommissions

$
19,893,000


$
15,422,000


$
4,471,000



29
%Net dealer inventory gains


3,694,000



4,069,000



(375,000
)


-9
%Investment banking


1,386,000



482,000



904,000



188
%Interest and dividends


609,000



336,000



273,000



81
%Transfer fees and clearance services


1,854,000



2,108,000



(254,000
)


-12
%Other


1,458,000



1,344,000



114,000



8
%$
28,894,000


$
23,761,000


$
5,133,000



22
%


Total revenues increased $5,133,000, or 22%, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 to $28,494,000 from $23,761,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010.  The increase in revenues is primarily due to slightly more favorable market conditions in retail brokerage and investment banking.  Commission revenue increased $4,471,000, or 29%, to $19,893,000 from $15,422,000 during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009, which is attributable to generally more favorable market conditions.  Net dealer inventory gains, which includes profits on proprietary trading, market making activities and customer mark-ups and mark-downs, decreased $375,000, or 9%, to $3,694,000 from $4,069,000 during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to less favorable trading conditions affecting our foreign trading activities in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same quarter in 2009.





Investment banking revenue increased $904,000, or 188% to $1,386,000 from $482,000 during the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2009.  This increase was attributable to substantially better market conditions for investment banking activity resulting in greater success, advisory and consulting fees  for services provided during the quarter.  Interest and dividend income increased by $273,000 or 81%, to $609,000 from $336,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009.  The increase in interest income is attributable to somewhat higher customer margin account balances and higher customer free cash balances during the quarter.  Transfer fees decreased $254,000 or 12%, to $1,854,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 from $2,108,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease is due primarily to slightly lower total transactional volume quarter over quarter.





Other revenue, consisting of asset management fees, miscellaneous transaction fees and trading fees and other investment income, increased $114,000, or 8%, to $1,458,000 from $1,344,000 during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is due primarily to slightly more favorable business conditions.





In comparison with the 22% increase in total revenues, total expenses increased only 17%, up by $4,250,000,000 to $29,938,000 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $25,688,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  This increase was primarily driven by the increase in revenues causing a corresponding increase in commissions.





29




Three Months EndedMarch 31,


Increase (Decrease)2010


2009


Amount


PercentCommissions

$
22,236,000


$
18,007,000


$
4,229,000



23
%Employee compensation


3,087,000



3,037,000



50,000



2
%Clearing fees


(42,000
)


363,000



(405,000
)


-112
%Communications


981,000



1,031,000



(50,000
)


-5
%Occupancy and equipment costs


1,372,000



1,426,000



(54,000
)


-4
%Professional fees


862,000



607,000



255,000



42
%Interest


302,000



309,000



(7,000
)


-2
%Taxes, licenses and registration


404,000



342,000



62,000



18
%Other administrative expenses


736,000



567,000



169,000



30
%$
29,938,000


$
25,689,000


$
4,249,000



17
%


Commission expense, which includes expenses related to commission revenue, net dealer inventory gains and investment banking, increased $4,229,000, or 23%, to $22,236,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 from $18,007,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in the related commission revenues.  Commission expense also includes the amortization of advances to registered representatives of $631,000 and $364,000 for the second quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  These amounts fluctuate based upon the amounts of advances outstanding and the time period for which the registered representatives have agreed to be affiliated with National Securities.





Employee compensation expense increased $50,000, or 2%, to $3,087,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 from $3,037,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Employee compensation includes the amortization of the fair value associated with stock based compensation of $113,000 and $237,000 in the second quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Combined commission and employee compensation expense, as a percentage of revenue, decrease to 88% from 89% in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.





Clearing fees decreased $405,000 or 112%, to $(42,000) in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 from $363,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in clearing fees is due to the write off of a deferred revenue item caused by the termination of National’s clearing agreement with NFS resulting in a reduction of clearing costs of $456,000.





Communication expenses decreased $50,000 or 5%, to $981,000 from $1,031,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease is due to the Company beginning to reduce some of its older communications services now that newer, faster and more stable services have been implemented as a result of the merger.  Occupancy costs decreased $54,000, or 4%, to $1,372,000 from $1,426,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.





Professional fees increased $255,000, or 42%, to $862,000 from $607,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The increase in professional fees is primarily a result of higher legal costs associated with the defense of arbitrations in fiscal year 2010 that were not incurred in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.





Interest expense decreased $7,000, or 2%, to $302,000 from $309,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in interest expense is attributable to the Company having renegotiated a lower interest on its note with Christopher Dewey from an interest rate of 10% to 7%.   Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing costs of $12,000 and $13,000 the second quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Taxes, licenses and registration increased $62,000, or 18%, to $404,000 from $342,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The increase in taxes, licenses and registration is due to a general increase in fees paid to regulators and other governmental agencies.  Other administrative expenses increased $170,000 or 30% to $736,000 from $566,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The increase is due to primarily to the addition of new email, email compliance, and continuing education programs to ensure the Company remains in compliance with rules and regulations.





30





The Company reported a net loss of $1,044,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to a net loss of $1,927,000 in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The net loss attributable to common stockholders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $1,139,000, or $0.07 per common share, as compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $2,011,000, or $.12 per common share.  The net loss attributable to common stockholders for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009 reflects $95,000 and $83,000, respectively of cumulative preferred stock dividends on the Company’s preferred stock.





Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended March 31, 2009





The Company’s first six months of fiscal year 2010 resulted in an increase in revenues, with a lower increase in expenses compared to the same period last year.  As a result, the Company reported a net loss of $1,705,000 compared with a net loss of $3,070,000 for the first six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Six Months EndedMarch 31,


Increase (Decrease)2010


2009


Amount


PercentCommissions

$
37,587,000


$
30,831,000


$
6,756,000



22
%Net dealer inventory gains


7,862,000



11,079,000



(3,217,000
)


-29
%Investment banking


3,039,000



1,149,000



1,890,000



164
%Interest and dividends


1,109,000



1,033,000



76,000



7
%Transfer fees and clearance services


4,760,000



4,271,000



489,000



11
%Other


2,863,000



2,663,000



200,000



8
%$
57,220,000


$
51,026,000


$
6,194,000



12
%


Total revenues increased $6,194,000, or 12%, in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to $57,220,000 from $51,026,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010.  The increase in revenues is primarily due to slightly more favorable market conditions with an emphasis on retail brokerage and investment banking.  Commission revenue increased $6,756,000, or 22%, to $37,587,000 from $30,831,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009, which is attributable to generally more favorable market conditions.  Net dealer inventory gains, which includes profits on proprietary trading, market making activities and customer mark-ups and mark-downs, decreased $3,217,000,, or 29%, to $7,862,000 from $11,079,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to less favorable trading conditions affecting our treasury and foreign trading activities in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same quarter in 2009.





Investment banking revenue increased $1,890,000, or 164% to $3,039,000 from $1,149,000 during the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2009.  This increase was attributable to substantially better market conditions for investment banking activity resulting in greater success, advisory and consulting fees for services provided during the six month period.  Interest and dividend income increased by $76,000 or 7%, to $ 1,109,000 from $1,033,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared with the same period in fiscal year 2009.  The increase in interest income is attributable to somewhat higher customer margin account balances and higher customer free cash balances during the six month period.  Transfer fees increased $489,000 or 11%, to $4,760,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 from $4,271,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is due primarily to slightly more favorable business conditions and slightly higher transaction volume for the six month period.





31





Other revenue, consisting of asset management fees, miscellaneous transaction fees and trading fees and other investment income, increased $201,000, or 8%, to $2,863,000 from $2,663,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is due primarily to slightly more favorable business conditions.





In comparison with the 12% increase in total revenues, total expenses only increased by $4,829,000 or 9% to $58,925,000 for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to $54,096,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  This increase was primarily driven by the increase in revenues causing a corresponding increase in commissions offset by a reduction in clearing fees and occupancy costs. This increase in total expenses is primarily a result of the management's focus on cost cutting.


Six Months EndedMarch 31,


Increase (Decrease)2010


2009


Amount


PercentCommissions

$
43,616,000


$
38,463,000


$
5,153,000



13
%Employee compensation


6,140,000



6,044,000



96,000



2
%Clearing fees


407,000



969,000



(562,000
)


-58
%Communications


2,001,000



1,893,000



108,000



6
%Occupancy and equipment costs


2,668,000



2,832,000



(164,000
)


-6
%Professional fees


1,367,000



1,370,000



(3,000
)


0
%Interest


596,000



634,000



(38,000
)


-6
%Taxes, licenses and registration


863,000



602,000



261,000



43
%Other administrative expenses


1,267,000



1,289,000



(22,000
)


-2
%$
58,925,000


$
54,096,000


$
4,829,000



9
%


Commission expense, which includes expenses related to commission revenue, net dealer inventory gains and investment banking, increased $5,153,000, or 13%, to $43,616,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 from $38,463,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in the related commission revenues.  Commission expense also includes the amortization of advances to registered representatives of $918,000 and $759,000 for the first six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  These amounts fluctuate based upon the amounts of advances outstanding and the time period for which the registered representatives have agreed to be affiliated with National Securities.





Employee compensation expense increased $96,000, or 2%, to $6,140,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 from $6,044,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  Employee compensation includes the amortization of the fair value associated with stock based compensation of $296,000 and $473,000 in the first six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Overall, combined commission and employee compensation expense, as a percentage of revenue was unchanged at 87% in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.





Clearing fees decreased $562,000 or 58%, to $407,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 from $969,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in clearing fees is due to the write off of a deferred revenue item caused by the termination of National’s clearing agreement with NFS resulting in a reduction of clearing costs of $456,000.





32





Communication expenses increased $108,000 or 6%, to $2,001,000 from $1,893,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The increase is due to the Company applying much of its IT infrastructure design across all of its locations due to the merger.  Occupancy costs decreased $164,000, or 6%, to $2,668,000 from $2,832,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in occupancy expense is due to the Company reducing its square footage rented as well as negotiating slightly better rental agreements since the merger.





Professional fees decreased $3,000, or 0%, to $1,367,000 from $1,370,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.





Interest expense decreased $38,000, or 6%, to $596,000 from $634,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in interest expense is attributable to the Company renegotiating a lower interest on its note with Christopher Dewey from an interest rate of 10% to 7%. Included in interest expense is the amortization of deferred financing costs of $22,000 and $27,000 for the first six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Taxes, licenses and registration increased $261,000, or 43%, to $863,000 from $602,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The increase in taxes, licenses and registration is due to a general increase in fees paid to regulators and other governmental agencies.  Other administrative expenses decreased $22,000 or 2% to $1,267,000 from $1,289,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.





The Company reported a net loss of $1,705,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to a net loss of $3,070,000 in the first six months of fiscal year 2009.  The net loss attributable to common stockholders in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was $1,898,000, or $0.11 per common share, as compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders in the first six months of fiscal year 2009 of $3,239,000, or $.20 per common share.  The net loss attributable to common stockholders for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009 reflects $193,000 and $169,000, respectively of cumulative preferred stock dividends on the Company’s preferred stock.





33





NON-G.A.A.P. INFORMATION





Management considers EBITDA, as adjusted, an important indicator in evaluating our business on a consistent basis across various periods.  Due to the significance of non-recurring items, EBITDA, as adjusted, enables our board of directors and management to monitor and evaluate our business on a consistent basis.  We use EBITDA, as adjusted, as a primary measure, among others, to analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments and potential acquisitions.  We believe that EBITDA, as adjusted, eliminates items that are not part of our core operations, such as interest expense and amortization expense associated with intangible assets, or do not involve a cash outlay, such as stock-related compensation. EBITDA, as adjusted should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, pre-tax income, net income and cash flows from operating activities.  For the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, EBITDA, as adjusted, was $451,000 and $928,000, respectively.  For the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, EBITDA, as adjusted, was ($621,000) and ($431,000), respectively.  This improvement of $1,072,000 and $1,359,000 in both the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 over 2009 resulted from higher revenues and decrease in operating costs focused on a decrease in employee compensation, occupancy costs and communications costs.





The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA, as adjusted, to net income as reported.


Three Months Ended


Six Months EndedMarch 31,


March 31,2010


2009


2010


2009Net income (loss), as reported

$
(1,044,000
)

$
(1,928,000
)

$
(1,706,000
)

$
(3,070,000
)Interest expense


302,000



309,000



596,000



634,000Taxes


37,000



33,000



85,000



77,000Depreciation


184,000



200,000



358,000



362,000Amortization


162,000



162,000



317,000



324,000EBITDA


(359,000
)


(1,224,000
)


(350,000
)


(1,673,000
)Non-cash compensation expense


178,000



237,000



360,000



473,000Amortization of forgivable loans


632,000



366,000



918,000



769,000EBITDA, as adjusted

$
451,000


$
(621,000
)

$
928,000


$
(431,000
)


Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, adjusted for gains or losses on sales of assets, non-cash compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt, is a key metric the Company uses in evaluating its business. EBITDA is considered a non-GAAP financial measure as defined by Regulation G promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





Liquidity and Capital Resources





Our Broker Dealer Subsidiaries are subject to the SEC'sUniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1, which is designed to measure the general financial integrity and liquidity of a broker-dealer andrequires the maintenance of minimum net capital.  Net capital is defined as the net worth of a broker-dealer subject to certain adjustments.  In computing net capital, various adjustments are made to net worth that exclude assets not readily convertible into cash.  Additionally, the regulations require that certain assets, such as a broker-dealer's position in securities, be valued in a conservative manner so as to avoid over-inflation of the broker-dealer's net capital.National Securities has elected to use the alternative standard method permitted by the rule.  This requires that National Securities maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or a specified amount per security based on the bid price of each security for which National Securities is a market maker.  At March 31, 2010, National Securities’ net capital exceeded the requirement by $187,000.  Due to its market maker status, vFinance Investments is required to maintain a minimum net capital of $1,000,000 and at March 31, 2010, vFinance was under the minimum required net capital to operate by approximately $100,000.  and EquityStation is required to maintain $100,000.  Equity Station had excess net capital of $143,000.





34





Advances, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals from the Company’s subsidiaries are restricted by the regulations of the SEC and other regulatory agencies.  These regulatory restrictions may limit the amounts that a subsidiary may dividend or advance to the Company.  During the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2010 the Company did not have any equity withdrawals.





The Company extends unsecured credit in the normal course of business to its brokers.  The determination of the appropriate amount of the reserve for uncollectible accounts is based upon a review of the amount of credit extended, the length of time each receivable has been outstanding, and the specific individual brokers from whom the receivables are due.





The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that the Company has ready access to sufficient funds to meet commitments, fund deposit withdrawals and efficiently provide for the credit needs of customers.





Our primary sources of liquidity include our cash flow from operations, the sale of our securities and other financing activities. We believe that we have sufficient funds from operations to fund our ongoing operating requirements through at least fiscal year 2010.  If market conditions should weaken, the Company would need to consider curtailing certain of its business activities, reducing its fixed overhead costs and/or seek additional sources of financing.





Cash used in operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 amounted to $809,000, which was primarily due to our net loss of $1,705,000, reduced by non cash adjustments of $668,000 in depreciation and amortization, $1,042,000 in advances to registered representatives amortization of forgivable loans, $296,000 in stock compensation expense, $697,000 in amortization of note discount, a decrease in receivables from our clearing firms of $781,000 and an increase in our securities owned; marketable at fair value of $251,000, offset by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,474,000, a decrease in other receivables of $235,000 and a decrease in other assets of $196,000 further contributed to the reduction in cash used in operations.





Cash used in investing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 amounted to $321,000, which was due to the need to purchase fixed assets under mostly capital leases.  The majority of these capital purchases were for the ongoing upgrade of technology in our Downtown Manhattan office.





Cash used in financing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 amounted to $500,000, which was as result of a repayment of an outstanding note payable.





Cash used by operating activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 amounted to $2,480,000, which was primarily due to our net loss of $3,070,000, reduced by non cash adjustments of $672,000 in depreciation and amortization, $441,000 in stock compensation expense and $238,000 in amortization of note discount. A decrease of $610,000 in advances to registered representatives through amortization of forgivable loans and $735,000 in accounts payable and accrued expenses was offset by an increase in other receivables of $385,000, $1,152,000 in securities owned, marketable at fair value and a reduction of payables to other broker dealers all contributed to the decrease in cash used by operations.





35


Cash used in investing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 amounted to $343,000, which was due to the purchase of fixed assets.





Cash used in financing activities for the first six months of fiscal year 2009 amounted to $150,000, which was as result of a repayment of an outstanding note payable.




OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS




We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.




NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS




See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.





ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK





The Company's primary market risk arises from the fact that it engages in proprietary trading and historically made dealer markets in equity securities.  Accordingly, the Company may be required to maintain certain amounts of inventories in order to facilitate customer order flow.  The Company may incur losses as a result of price movements in these inventories due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices and other political factors.  The Company is not subject to direct market risk due to changes in foreign exchange rates. However, the Company is subject to market risk as a result of changes in interest rates and equity prices, which are affected by global economic conditions.   The Company manages its exposure to market risk by limiting its net long or short positions.  Trading and inventory accounts are monitored daily by management and the Company has instituted position limits.





Credit risk represents the amount of accounting loss the Company could incur if counterparties to its proprietary transactions fail to perform and the value of any collateral proves inadequate.  Although credit risk relating to various financing activities is reduced by the industry practice of obtaining and maintaining collateral, the Company maintains more stringent requirements to further reduce its exposure.  The Company monitors its exposure to counterparty risk on a daily basis by using credit exposure information and monitoring collateral values.  The Company maintains a credit committee, which reviews margin requirements for large or concentrated accounts and sets higher requirements or requires a reduction of either the level of margin debt or investment in high-risk securities or, in some cases, requiring the transfer of the account to another broker-dealer.





The Company monitors its market and credit risks daily through internal control procedures designed to identify and evaluate the various risks to which the Company is exposed.  There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's risk management procedures and internal controls will prevent losses from occurring as a result of such risks.





The following table shows the quoted market values of marketable securities owned ("long") by the Company, securities sold but not yet purchased ("short") the Company, and net positions as of March 31, 2010:


Long


Short


NetCorporate stocks

$
112,000


$
15,000


$
97,000Corporate bonds


12,000



-



12,000Government obligations


407,000



166,000



241,000$
531,000


$
181,000


$
350,000  36
  ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES





Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.





Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure and control procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and principal accounting officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.





Based on the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) required by the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was being prepared.





Changes in internal controls.





We have continually had in place systems relating to internal control over financial reporting.  There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that could significantly affect those controls and procedures subsequent to the date of our evaluation nor any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such internal controls and procedures requiring corrective actions.





We have taken steps to remediate the weaknesses in our internal control discovered as a result of our accounting review which led to the correction of certain errors and believe that such weaknesses in internal control for the quarterly periods as of March 31, 2009 have been fully remediated.  We are in the process of hiring a third-party consultant who specializes in compliance with SOX and FINRA Net Capital requirements to ensure that controls and procedures are in place.





37





PART II – OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





In early 2009, Vincent Falco commenced a FINRA arbitration against National Securities and two of its representatives.  Claimant alleged that National Securities and the registered representatives purchased unsuitable securities, failed to follow instructions regarding the use of margin, made misrepresentations of material fact and/or omitted material facts in connection with the purchase of securities, managed the account negligently, breached their contract with Mr. Falco, breached fiduciaries duties owed to him, and violated FINRA Conduct Rules.  Claimant further alleged that National Securities negligently supervised the account  Claimant sought compensatory damages from all respondents in the amount of $3,000,000, punitive damages of $9,000,000, plus disgorgement of fees, attorneys’ fees, forum fees, costs and interest, all in undisclosed amounts.  The Company and Mr. Falco entered into a settlement agreement in February 2010 whereby the Company agreed to pay Mr. Falco $900,000 plus the issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.  The Company’s insurer paid the $900,000 to Mr. Falco, the Company issued the shares, and the case was dismissed with prejudice .





In April 2010, Triage Partners, LLC, (“Triage”) a stockholder of the company and an affiliate of Steven B. Sands and Martin S. Sands, former Co-Chairmen of the Board and directors of the Company, filed an action in the Supreme Court of the New York, New York County, Index # 601114/10, for a declaratory judgment.  Triage alleges that the Company’s 2008 acquisition of vFinance, Inc. by way of a reverse merger  constitutes a “Liquidity Event” under the terms of the Company’s Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of it Series A Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”), entitling Triage to the payment of  a liquidation preference on its shares of Series A Preferred Stock..  Triage seeks a declaration that the acquisition with vFinance, Inc. was a Liquidity Event as defined in the Certificate of Designations, and the payment of damages in the amount of $1,070,700, plus accumulated dividends as of July 1, 2008, plus interest, allowable costs and other damages. The Company has until June 11, 2010 to respond to this claim.  The Company intends to defend itself vigorously in this action and believes that the eventual outcome of this matter will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company.  However, the ultimate outcome of this matter cannot be determined at this time.





Other than those events described above, during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there were no significant developments in the Company’s legal proceedings.  For a detailed discussion of the Company’s legal proceedings, please refer to Note 13 herein, and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.





ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS





There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009.





ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITYSECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS





In February 2010 the Company issued 125,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in connection with the settlement of certain claims.  See “Item 1. Legal Proceedings” above.





The issuance and sale of the securities in the settlement is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Regulation D and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Claimant provided certain representations to us acknowledging that he had had the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers from the Company regarding the securities and the business of the Company, that he had access to the Company’s periodic reports as filed with the SEC and that he was an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D. We did not engage in general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuance of these securities and did not offer securities to the public.





38





ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES





None.





ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)








ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION





None.





ITEM 6. EXHIBITS





31.1
Chief Executive Officer’s Certificate pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


31.2
Chief Financial Officer’s Certificate pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


32.1
Chief Executive Officer’s Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


32.2
Chief Financial Officer’s Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


39


SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.








NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES





August 6, 2010
By:
/s/ Mark GoldwasserMark GoldwasserChief Executive Officer


August 6, 2010
By:
/s/ Alan B. LevinAlan B. LevinChief Financial Officer