alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1528

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to assure coverage for legal

immigrant children and pregnant women under the Medicaid Program

and the State children’s health insurance program (SCHIP).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to assure

coverage for legal immigrant children and pregnant

women under the Medicaid Program and the State children’s health insurance program (SCHIP).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legal Immigrant

5 Health Restoration Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1528 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF LEGAL IMMIGRANT PREGNANT

2 WOMEN AND CHILDREN UNDER THE MED3 ICAID PROGRAM AND SCHIP.

4 (a) MEDICAID PROGRAM.—Section 1903(v) of the

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)) is amended by

6 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(4)(A) Notwithstanding sections 401(a), 402(b),

8 403, and 421 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Op9 portunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, a State plan under

10 this title shall provide (in a plan amendment) medical as11 sistance under this title for aliens who are lawfully resid12 ing in the United States (including battered aliens de13 scribed in section 431(c) of such Act) and who are other14 wise eligible for such assistance, within either of the fol15 lowing eligibility categories:

16 ‘‘(i) PREGNANT WOMEN.—Women during preg17 nancy (and during the 60-day period beginning on

18 the last day of the pregnancy).

19 ‘‘(ii) CHILDREN.—Children (as defined under

20 such plan), including optional targeted low-income

21 children described in section 1905(u)(2)(B).

22 ‘‘(B) No debt shall accrue under an affidavit of sup23 port against any sponsor of an alien within a category of

24 aliens under subparagraph (A) on the basis of provision

25 of assistance to such category and the cost of such assist26 ance shall not be considered as an unreimbursed cost.’’.
3

•HR 1528 IH

1 (b) SCHIP.—Section 2107(e)(1) of such Act (42

2 U.S.C. 1397gg(e)(1)) as amended by section 803 of the

3 Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement

4 and Protection Act of 2000, as enacted into law by section

5 1(a)(6) of Public Law 106–554, is amended by redesig6 nating subparagraphs (C) and (D) as subparagraph (D)

7 and (E), respectively, and by inserting after subparagraph

8 (B) the following new subparagraph:

9 ‘‘(C) Section 1903(v)(4) (relating to cov10 erage of categories of permanent resident alien

11 children).’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2001, and apply

14 to medical assistance and child health assistance furnished

15 on or after such date.

Æ
#### In the Matter of John McGuire, V.M.D., Petitioner, v Michael J. Hoblock, Jr., as Chairman of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, et al., Respondents.

[808 NYS2d 669]

Determination of respondent State Racing and Wagering Board, dated September 24, 2004, finding that petitioner veterinarian violated 9 NYCRR 4043.3 (d) and 4012.4 (c), and imposing a 180-day suspension and a $1,000 fine, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Jane S. Solomon, J.], entered February 25, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence, including, in particular, the eyewitness testimony of respondent’s investigator, supports the findings that petitioner attempted to administer a prohibited “milkshake” on the day of a race and did so without making reasonable inquiry whether the horse was scheduled to race that day. No basis exists to disturb the hearing officer’s findings of credibility *(see e.g. Matter of Sachs v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., Div. of Harness Racing,*1 AD3d 768, 772 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 706 [2004]). The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness *(cf. Matter of Beckwith v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.,*219 AD2d 516 [1995]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the
undersigned, Denise Hawkins, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Denise Hawkins 
Denise Hawkins
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  July 22, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending October 22, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCARPENTER FUND MANAGER GP, LLC                                                                                          * 3A3Carpenter Fund Manager GP, LLC, Carpenter Fund Management Company, LLC, Carpenter Community Bancfund, L.P., Carpenter Community BanFund -A, L.P., Carpenter Community BandFund - CA, L.P., SCJ, Inc., and CCFW, Inc., all of Irvine, California, and all existing controlling parties, to acquire additional shares of stock in Manhattan Bancorp, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Bank of Manhattan, N.A., both of  El Segundo, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/28/2011COASTAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                           CICInteragency Notice of Change in Control by Montlake Capital II, L.P, a limited partnership and Montlake Capital II-B, L.P., a limited partnership, Seattle, Washington, to acquire voting shares of Coastal Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire Coastal Community Bank, both of Everett, Washington; and 2)Coastal Financial Corporation and Coastal Community Bank, both of Everett, Washington to appoint Andrew Russell Dale as a Director.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/27/2011FS BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                        * 3A1FS Bancorp, Inc.,, Mountlake Terrace, Washington, to become a bank holding company upon the conversion of 1st Security Bank of Washington, Mountlake Terrace, Washington, from a state savings bank to a commercial bank.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/10/2011RIVERBANK HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                               CICInteragency Notice of Change in Control by James Gaines McCullar and Carolyn Jean McCullar, both of Soap Lake, Washington, to acquire up to 22.44 percent of Riverbank Holding Company, and thereby indirectly acquire Riverbank, both of Spokane, Washington.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 10/07/2011
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John B. Higginbotham, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Integral Systems, Inc.;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: December 31, 2008              
|                                     
|/s/ JOHN B. HIGGINBOTHAM             
|John B. Higginbotham                 
|Chief Executive Officer and President
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

The undersigned officer of Pizza Inn, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2009, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the        “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: September 23, 2009 |   | By: | /s/ Nancy Ellefson     

Vice President of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
|--------------------------|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6054

COSMO THOMAS CAPORASSO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES B. FRENCH, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-219-1, CA-99-220-1, CA-99-221-1)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John David Bryson, WYATT, EARLY, HARRIS & WEAVER, L.L.P., High

Point, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

November 19, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on November 22, 1999. Pursuant to

Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we

take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. Wilson

v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Cosmo Thomas Caporasso seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Caporasso v. Attorney General

of North Carolina, Nos. CA-99-219-1; CA-99-220-1; CA-99-221-1

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew Makrides, the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Bovie Medical Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements,  and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material  respects the  financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. The  Registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant  and we have: a) designed such  disclosure  controls
and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
to us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the
effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual  report (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and c)  presented  in this annual  report our  conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors
and the audit  committee of  Registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing  the  equivalent  function):  a) all  significant
deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of  internal  controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize and report  financial data and have identified for the  Registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in internal
controls;  and b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  Registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have  indicated  in this annual  report  whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/Andrew Makrides
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1 
<CASH>                                           6,025
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,076
<INVENTORY>                                      16,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 63,905
<PP&E>                                           284,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   580,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            47,160
<BONDS>                                          220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                       294,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     580,224
<SALES>                                          623,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 623,267
<CGS>                                            505,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    505,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 72,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  16,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              16,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     16,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .92

        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending September 8, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodJPMORGAN CHASE & CO.                                                                                                    InvestmentJPMorgan Chase & Co., New York, New York, provides prior notice to the Board, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K, of its intention to make an investment. Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-166348, 333-137325, 333-104835, 333-104458, 333-88382, 333-86113, 333-01649, and 333-162256 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-166441 and 333-163896 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 10, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of West Coast Bancorp, and the effectiveness of West Coast Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2010.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Portland, Oregon
March 10, 2011




104




---
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1993...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.2 .8 1.4 .2 1.2

1994...... .8 .3 .4 .1 .3 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003...... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

1996: Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.7 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.0 .7 1.3 .3 .9

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998: Q1... 1.3 .8 .6 .2 .4 3.2 1.8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q2... 1.1 .5 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.1 1.3 .5 .8

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.1 .8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999: Q1... 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .4 3.7 2.1 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004: Q1... 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5 3.0 1.3 1.6 .4 1.2

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries. 

# ACTION:

Renewal of Advisory Committee. 

# SUMMARY:

The Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries announces the renewal of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Glenda Shoots, 202-622-8280. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Joint Board on examinations in actuarial mathematics and methodology. The Joint Board administers such examinations in discharging its statutory mandate to enroll individuals who wish to perform actuarial services with respect to pension plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Committee's advisory functions will include, but will not necessarily be limited to: (1) Considering areas of actuarial knowledge that should be treated on the examinations; (2) developing examination questions; (3) recommending proposed examinations and pass marks; and (4), as requested by the Joint Board, making recommendations relative to the examination program. 

Dated: September 15, 2008. 

Carolyn E. Zimmerman, 

Chairman, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

 [FR Doc. E8-23170 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P