alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
SABINSA CORP.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

HERBAKRAFT, INC., Defendant

PRAKRUTI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD., Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2023

- 2002

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 1:14

- cv

- 04738

- RBK

- SAK, Senior Judge Robert B. Kugler.

______________________

Before D YK

, C UNNINGHAM

, and S TARK

, Circuit Judges

.
P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

Following this court’s show cause order directing the parties to address whether this appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we dismiss.

T he district court sanctioned Prakruti Products PVT.
Ltd. (“Prakruti”) for discovery misconduct. The court Case: 23-2002 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 10/20/2023SABINSA CORP

. v. HERBAKRAFT

, INC

. 2

thereafter held Prakruti in “civil contempt ” for failing to comply with the sanctions order, directed the clerk of court
to enter default , and scheduled briefing on default judgment. Prakruti filed this appeal , even though the motion for default judgment remains pending

. In general, we only have jurisdiction to review a “final decision” from district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a) (1)

— one that “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment

. ” Catlin v.
United States , 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). Here, Prakruti does not appeal f rom such a decision

. “[C]ivil contempt orders [against parties] are not final judgments, even when a
fine is assessed

, ” Entegris, Inc. v. Pall Corp. , 490 F.3d 1340,

1347

– 48 (Fed. Cir. 2007), and “the entry of default is an ‘interlocutory act and, as such, a non

- final order

. ’” City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC , 645 F.3d 114, 128 n.15 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation omitted)

. Accordingly

,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

October 20 , 2023
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
Jarrett B. Perlow
Clerk of Court Case: 23-2002 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 10/20/2023
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Foldera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Richard Lusk, Chief Executive Officer,
      and Reid Dabney, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April
      13,
      2007




/s/:
                Richard LuskRichard
                LuskChief
                Executive Officer


/s/:
                  Reid DabneyReid
                    DabneySenior
                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 08-cv-323-PB

Richard Gerry, Warden,

New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Before the Court is Randolph Chambers’ petition for a writ

of habeas corpus (document no. 1) and addendum thereto (document

no. 3), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter is before

me for preliminary review. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing §

2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (requiring

initial review to determine whether the petition is facially

valid); United States District Court District of New Hampshire

Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(2) (authorizing magistrate judge to

preliminarily review pro se filings by incarcerated persons). 

Also before the Court for consideration is Chambers’ motion to

amend his petition for a writ of habeas corpus (document no. 6)

and his amended complaint (document no. 7). In those pleadings,

Chambers seeks to convert his action from a habeas petition to a

civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As explained in my

Case 1:08-cv-00323-PB Document 9 Filed 10/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Report and Recommendation, issued simultaneously with this Order,

I recommend that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be

dismissed and the motion to amend be denied. 

For reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation

issued this date, I direct the Clerk’s Office to open a new civil

rights case and to docket Chambers’ amended complaint (document

no. 7) as the complaint in the new case. The Clerk’s office may

also rely on Chambers’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(document no. 4), and my previous grant of that motion. Chambers

must still submit a certificate of custodial institution. When

that certificate is received, the Clerk’s Office will forward

that information to me for a determination what initial filing

fee, if any, is due. When the initial filing fee, if any, is

paid, the matter will be forwarded to me for preliminary review. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); LR 4.3(d)(2). 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 23, 2008

cc: Randolph L. Chambers, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00323-PB Document 9 Filed 10/23/08 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 24, 2008, Johnson 
Matthey Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West 
Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by letter to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of Gamma-
Hydroxybutyric acid (2010), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule I.
    The company plans on producing sodium oxybate for sale to its 
customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than November 28, 2008.

    Dated: September 22, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22874 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,360
<INVENTORY>                                    208,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               277,305
<PP&E>                                          40,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          222,370
<BONDS>                                          7,204
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,815
<SALES>                                        545,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,811
<CGS>                                          464,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,147)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,597)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)



</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 954 

Honoring the life of senior Border Patrol agent Luis A. Aguilar, who lost 

his life in the line of duty near Yuma, Arizona, on January 19, 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California (for herself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. 

REYES, Ms. GIFFORDS, Mr. CARNEY, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. 

AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN

of California, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. 

PENCE, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. HILL, Mr. SHULER, Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, 

Mr. SPACE, Mr. ELLSWORTH, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. HALL of 

New York, Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. DONNELLY, and Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of senior Border Patrol agent Luis A. 

Aguilar, who lost his life in the line of duty near Yuma, 

Arizona, on January 19, 2008. 

Whereas Luis Aguilar was born in El Paso, Texas, on November 26, 1976, to Luis Aguilar and Cecilia G. Silva; 

Whereas Luis Aguilar resided in Somerton, Arizona, and is 

survived by his mother and father, his wife, Erica 

Aguilar, his two children, Luis and Ariana, his brother, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 954 IH 

senior Border Patrol agent Marco Antonio Aguilar, and 

his sister, Angie Aguilar; 

Whereas Luis Aguilar joined the United States Border Patrol 

on July 21, 2002; 

Whereas on January 19, 2008, after over 5 years of dedicated service in the United States Border Patrol, Luis 

Aguilar selflessly paid the ultimate sacrifice in service to 

the United States; 

Whereas Border Patrol agents carry out the vital role of protecting our Nation’s borders and ensuring the safety of 

the United States; 

Whereas Border Patrol agents work devotedly and selflessly 

on behalf of the people of the United States, without regard for the peril or danger to themselves; and 

Whereas the United States will forever be grateful for the 

service of Luis Aguilar and mourn his loss: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the dedication and sacrifice made 

3 by the men and women who have lost their lives 

4 while serving as United States Border Patrol agents; 

5 (2) honors Luis Aguilar for his service as a 

6 Border Patrol agent and for his sacrifice to the 

7 United States; and 

8 (3) extends its deepest condolences to the fam9 ily of Luis Aguilar. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, May 4-8, 2009Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,367,355 60,087 113,225 631,005 335,050 64,331 5,55Number of loans 27,794 1,794 3,374 12,374 5,007 704 25Weighted average maturity (months)1 20.85 12.72 36.31 20.57 20.62 16.26 6.7

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 6.01 8.30 11.84 6.03 4.71 3.24 2.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.19 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 4.89 5.31 5.90 4.85 4.27 5.20 3.9 Standard error5 .11 .20 .18 .21 .24 .23 1.

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.14 6.18 6.61 6.06 5.12 6.43 4.0 25th percentile 3.43 4.08 5.12 3.56 2.95 2.91 1.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.37 5.00 6.47 5.27 4.57 3.96 5.2 Other livestock 6.81 6.29 5.58 3.24 3.98 9.65 5.5 Other current operating expenses7 5.27 5.82 5.02 4.63 4.89 6.93 5.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.60 6.42 5.52 6.14 5.17 8.02 6. Farm real estate 7.27 5.92 5.82 5.95 6.17 n.a. 5.4 Other8 5.06 4.23 4.02 3.50 5.81 2.69 3.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 75.96 32.94 49.13 79.15 91.09 86.58 83.0 Under commitment 75.63 64.01 55.78 83.38 86.26 89.46 42.0 Callable 23.15 32.59 13.40 33.66 10.29 9.93 . Subject to prepayment penalty 11.09 n.a. 2.55 7.90 23.33 32.18 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.49 16.47 11.65 4.28 2.05 1.52 n Other livestock 5.99 4.32 3.87 3.85 12.23 8.77 1.5 Other current operating expenses7 57.76 76.43 65.22 59.36 53.53 45.52 10.5 Farm machinery and equipment 4.40 1.24 4.75 3.68 1.27 2.90 13. Farm real estate 4.64 .25 10.81 3.77 5.81 3.28 n Other8 21.72 1.29 3.70 25.06 25.11 38.01 74.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.23 1.73 18.74 13.42 13.76 11.87 12. Other 82.79 91.48 72.33 83.13 85.11 88.01 77.5 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2006...... 49.71 65.53 59.36 32.84 74.12 138.48 4.90 14.96 46.68 340.26 2007...... 48.27 64.93 50.33 36.27 47.41 117.22 5.35 15.11 46.62 302.38 2008...... 58.61 76.08 70.62 44.10 45.70 136.09 5.49 15.03 46.79 335.20 2009...... 55.71 68.17 58.34 46.97 47.09 107.13 5.37 14.90 47.16 358.13 2006: Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Q3... 51.48 81.93 89.64 26.57 50.49 172.18 5.41 15.01 45.16 377.96  Q4... 53.61 80.54 57.82 33.44 71.05 155.58 5.56 14.96 48.79 341.00 2007: Q1... 58.33 76.05 54.29 50.88 32.69 120.07 5.34 15.10 47.15 296.76  Q2... 39.55 48.25 33.93 32.08 41.55 95.17 5.40 15.11 45.96 276.68  Q3... 42.93 42.18 63.99 28.28 62.22 108.75 5.26 15.19 45.88 296.12  Q4... 54.29 84.90 53.85 36.07 53.00 145.08 5.39 15.03 47.47 335.44 2008: Q1... 66.99 70.42 57.84 57.17 37.17 152.28 5.63 15.42 46.38 339.22  Q2... 53.03 64.25 58.32 39.04 59.60 127.92 5.40 14.76 46.37 310.75  Q3... 56.57 97.26 91.69 40.35 42.95 136.38 5.42 14.53 46.29 368.80  Q4... 58.67 82.63 77.87 41.38 39.40 131.00 5.55 15.40 47.93 328.69 2009: Q1... 73.87 67.25 59.90 72.04 50.22 112.97 5.38 14.98 48.10 384.54  Q2... 47.33 47.69 45.07 41.40 33.44 98.43 5.38 15.17 46.75 308.72  Q3... 44.03 66.51 85.58 32.07 41.81 93.60 5.31 14.78 46.66 318.34  Q4... 57.43 82.88 51.12 42.60 59.12 124.83 5.40 14.68 47.03 405.48  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending April 15, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodTOPEKA BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                    * 3A1Topeka Bancorp, Inc., Topeka, Kansas, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Kaw Valley Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Kaw Valley Bank, both of Topeka, Kansas. Newspaper: 05/06/2017Federal Register: Not availableWHEELER COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                         CICJack Poulsen and Debra Poulsen, both of Ericson, Nebraska, to acquire voting shares of Wheeler County Bancshares, Inc., Ericson, Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire Ericson State Bank, Ericson, Nebraska. Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
H. Res. 95 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2007. 

Whereas in 2006, thirty-one states issued proclamations recognizing September as Campus Fire Safety Month; 

Whereas since January 2000, at least 113 people, including 

students, parents, and children have died in student 

housing fires; 

Whereas over three-fourths of these deaths have occurred in 

off-campus occupancies; 

Whereas a majority of the students across the Nation live in 

off-campus occupancies; 

Whereas a number of fatal fires have occurred in buildings 

where the fire safety systems have been compromised or 

disabled by the occupants; 

Whereas it is recognized that automatic fire alarm systems 

provide the necessary early warning to occupants and the 

fire department of a fire so that appropriate action can 

be taken; 

Whereas it is recognized that automatic fire sprinkler systems 

are a highly effective method of controlling or extinguishing a fire in its early stages, protecting the lives of 

the building’s occupants; 
2 

•HRES 95 EH 

Whereas many students are living in off-campus occupancies, 

Greek housing, and residence halls that are not adequately protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems 

and automatic fire alarm systems; 

Whereas it is recognized that fire safety education is an effective method of reducing the occurrence of fires and reducing the resulting loss of life and property damage; 

Whereas students are not routinely receiving effective fire 

safety education throughout their entire college career; 

Whereas it is vital to educate the future generation of our 

Nation about the importance of fire safety behavior so 

that these behaviors can help to ensure their safety during their college years and beyond; and 

Whereas by developing a generation of fire-safe adults, future 

loss of life from fires can be significantly reduced: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Campus Fire 

Safety Month; 

(2) encourages administrators and municipalities 

across the country to provide educational programs to all 

students during September and throughout the school 

year; and 

(3) encourages administrators and municipalities to 

evaluate the level of fire safety being provided in both 

on- and off-campus student housing and take the necessary steps to ensure fire-safe living environments 

through fire safety education, installation of fire sup-
3 

•HRES 95 EH 

pression and detection systems and the development and 

enforcement of applicable codes relating to fire safety. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.2

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                               ------------------
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is entered into
effective May 5, 2004 and amends the Employment Agreement ("Agreement") entered
into by and between GFY Foods, Inc. ("Corporation") and Edward Schwalb
("Employee").

         WHEREAS, Corporation desires to retain Employee in his capacity of
President and Chairman of Corporation;

         WHEREAS, Corporation and Employee desire to outline the monthly
compensation due to Employee in addition to the restricted stock due to him
under the Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the premises set forth and mutual
agreements herein expressed, and for other good and valuable consideration,
Corporation and Employee hereby agree to the amendments of the Agreement set
forth herein and to the continuation of the Agreement.

1. COMPENSATION. The following shall be added as a new paragraph 4(D) to the
Compensation section of the Agreement:

         "D. EMPLOYEE shall be due a monthly salary of Twenty-five thousand
dollars ($25,000.00) per month (the "Monthly Compensation"). This amount shall
be paid retroactively to the date of the Agreement. To the extent allowable
under the securities rules and regulations, CORPORATION may pay all or a portion
of the Monthly Compensation in freely trading stock under any S-8 filing or
other registration made by the CORPORATION."

2. COMPENSATION. The following shall be added as a new paragraph 4(E) to the
Compensation section of the Agreement:

         "E. CORPORATION shall pay to EMPLOYEE a bonus payment of Seventy
Thousand Dollars ($70,000.00) for any acquisition made by CORPORATION which has
been initiated by EMPLOYEE (the "Acquisition Bonus"). To the extent allowable
under the securities rules and regulations, CORPORATION may pay all or a portion
of the Acquisition Bonus in freely trading stock under any S-8 filing or other
registration made by the CORPORATION."


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and sword to this
Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first written above.


CORPORATION:                         GFY FOODS, INC.
                                     A Nevada corporation


                                     By: /s/ Edward Schwalb
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Edward Schwalb, President and Sole Director

<PAGE>


                  EMPLOYEE:          /s/ Edward Schwalb
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Edward Schwalb