MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this 

Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as 

precedent or cited before any court except for the 

purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, 

collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

R. Patrick Magrath

Alcorn Sage Schwartz & Magrath, LLP

Madison, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Gregory F. Zoeller

Attorney General of Indiana

Larry D. Allen

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

William Sherman Wilder,

Appellant-Defendant,

v.

State of Indiana,

Appellee-Plaintiff.

July 27, 2016

Court of Appeals Case No.

36A05-1512-CR-2278

Appeal from the Jackson Circuit 

Court.

The Honorable Richard W. Poynter, 

Judge.

Cause No. 36C01-1410-FA-22

Darden, Senior Judge

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 1 of 13
Statement of the Case

[1] William Sherman Wilder appeals his three convictions of child molesting, all 

Class A felonies.1

He also appeals his sixty-five-year sentence. We affirm.

Issues

[2] Wilder raises two issues, which we restate as:

I. Whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain his 

convictions.

II. Whether his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature 

of the offense and the character of the offender.

Facts and Procedural History

[3] On the night of December 31, 2013, thirteen-year-old A.B. sneaked out of her 

home with her thirteen-year-old friend, Khloe Clark, to attend a party. Around 

midnight, A.B. and Khloe arrived at an apartment in Seymour, Indiana.

[4] Several other people, including Wilder, were present. It is unclear whether this

was the first time A.B. had met Wilder. Vodka was provided to everyone, 

including A.B., who became intoxicated. Khloe saw Wilder kissing A.B. at the 

party during the evening. Later, Wilder took A.B. into a bedroom, where she 

lay down on a bed. He closed the door, approached A.B., and took off her 

1

 Ind. Code § 35-42-4-3 (2007).

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 2 of 13

 
shorts. Next, he took off his pants, climbed on A.B., and put his penis in her 

vagina. After fifteen or twenty minutes, Wilder stopped and left the room.

[5] On another evening in January 2014, A.B. went to a trailer home in Seymour to 

visit Lacie Thompson. Lacie’s mother and her mother’s boyfriend were also 

present. A.B. and Lacie drank tequila, and A.B. became intoxicated. Wilder 

arrived to visit Lacie’s mother. Later, Lacie’s mother announced she and Lacie

were going to the grocery store and asked Wilder to leave. He left the house 

when Lacie and her mother left, but he returned five minutes later. Lacie’s

mother’s boyfriend was in a bedroom, but A.B. and Wilder were otherwise 

alone.

[6] Wilder sat next to A.B. and touched her shoulder. She told him to “leave her 

alone” and that “he wasn’t supposed to be there.” Sept. 1, 2015 Tr. p. 27. 

Wilder responded, “Well, I’m here so what do you want to do?” Id. She said, 

“Nothing.” Id. Despite A.B.’s objections, Wilder tried to remove her shirt. 

She told him to “stop and leave me alone.” Id. at 28. A.B. also kept pushing 

him away. Wilder forcibly removed the intoxicated girl’s clothes and fondled 

her. A.B. did not call out for help because she felt “scared, trapped” and 

thought Lacie’s mother’s boyfriend “probably would have thought it was my 

fault.” Id. at 31.

[7] Next, Wilder pushed A.B. onto the couch, got on top of her, and put his penis 

in her vagina. After five minutes, Wilder heard Lacie and her mother 

returning, so he got up and ran out the back door of the trailer. A.B. tried to get

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 3 of 13
dressed and told Lacie what happened. Lacie urged A.B. to tell Lacie’s mother, 

but A.B. did not because she was scared.

[8] Later in January 2014, A.B. and Lacie were playing video games with Devin 

Dunn in a bedroom at the same apartment where the New Year’s Eve party 

had been held. Wilder occasionally stayed at the apartment, and he arrived 

while the group was playing video games. A.B. stayed for the night, intending 

to sleep on a futon. However, Wilder was already on the futon, and he refused 

Lacie’s request to move. As a result, A.B. laid out some blankets on the floor 

outside Lacie’s room. Everyone but Wilder and A.B. stayed in the bedroom, 

playing video games.

[9] A.B. testified that she got up in the middle of the night and went to the 

bathroom. Wilder was waiting for her when she left the bathroom and pulled 

her over to the futon, where he laid her down. Next, Wilder tried to kiss A.B., 

but she pushed him away. Undeterred, Wilder pulled up her nightgown and 

put his penis in her vagina. Sometime later, Dunn left Lacie’s bedroom and 

saw the two of them. Dunn told Wilder to get off of A.B. and took her into the

bedroom. Wilder left, and A.B. called her mother to come pick her up.

[10] On January 25, 2014, Dallas Johnson agreed to drive A.B. to her brother’s 

house. Wilder called Johnson, who was a relative of Wilder’s, and asked for a 

ride to work. Johnson picked up Wilder, over A.B.’s objection. Next, Johnson 

drove to a parking lot and stopped the truck. Sometime later, a police officer 

saw the truck and approached to see if the occupants were stranded. A.B. told 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 4 of 13
the officer the men knew her mother, but when the officer called A.B.’s mother, 

she denied knowing the men. The officer drove A.B. to her mother’s 

workplace. After A.B. left, Johnson asked Wilder whether he had sex with 

A.B., and Wilder laughingly said yes.

[11] Later that same day, A.B.’s mother called the officer and asked her to come to 

her house. A.B. was not present, and her mother showed the officer text 

messages on A.B.’s phone. One of the messages was from Wilder, and he 

instructed A.B. not to tell the police anything.

[12] An investigation by the police and the Department of Child Services ensued. 

During the investigation, Wilder asked Johnson to give him an alibi by telling

the police that they had been together on December 31, 2013, during the time 

when Wilder had been at the party. Johnson said he would not lie for Wilder.

[13] The State charged Wilder with three counts of Class A felony child molesting 

and alleged that he was an habitual offender. While Wilder was incarcerated, 

he wrote multiple letters asking acquaintances to give drugs to A.B. and, once 

she was intoxicated, to make a video recording of her saying that she made up 

the sexual assault allegations. In an undated letter to an unnamed recipient, he 

wrote that A.B. “likes meth and weed” and said he would “repay every dime” 

for purchasing the drugs to give A.B. October 5, 2015 Tr. Ex. 1. Wilder further 

wrote, “Bribe, lie, threat, cheat, manipulate, etc. . . . I don’t care.” Id.

[14] Apparently, Wilder had asked his acquaintance Marvin Perry to obtain a video 

recording of A.B. stating that she had lied about Wilder but was unable to 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 5 of 13
convince him to follow through. In a May 12, 2015 letter to Johnson, Wilder 

wrote, “I don’t feel at least [sic] bit sorry for what is and will happen to Marvin. 

He had his chance to go to [A.B.] and get her to do the video I been [sic] talking 

about.” Id. 

[15] In a June 29, 2015 letter to Johnson, Wilder stated he needed “someone sneaky 

enuff [sic] to go to [A.B.] and get her to amitt [sic] on video that it was all a lie 

and that nothing happened. And if someone can get it on video of [A.B.] drink 

[sic] or doing drugs that would play in my favor.” Id. Wilder also wrote, “If 

you know someone that will get the videos of [A.B.] I could be out before the 

end of July.” Id.

[16] In a July 8, 2015 letter to Johnson, Wilder asked him to “find someone to go 

get the videos I asked for. Proof of [A.B.] dranking [sic], doing drugs, and 

partying will also be a big help on my behalf. The more info you or anyone else 

can get will help make me look better and make her look more like the P.O.S. 

lier [sic] that she is.” Id. Wilder further stated, “If you got what I asked for I 

would buy a place were [sic] you could live rent free. You kinda would be 

working for me for rent.” Id.

[17] In later letters to Johnson, dated August 12 and August 13, 2015, Wilder 

mentioned a jailhouse acquaintance named Bobby that would be released soon 

and had promised to get “the videos of [A.B.] to fully clear [Wilder’s] name.” 

Id. Nevertheless, he again asked Johnson to have Perry get a video of [A.B.] 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 6 of 13
“saying that nothing never [sic] happened” and deliver copies of the video to 

the judge, the prosecutor, and his lawyer. Id.

[18] A.B. experienced substantial psychological trauma as a result of Wilder’s sexual 

assaults. She has received psychiatric treatment from inpatient and outpatient 

facilities. In addition, she has been prescribed medicine to address “depression, 

anxiety, suicidal thoughts.” October 5, 2015 Tr. p. 31.

[19] Wilder waived his right to a trial by jury. The trial court held a bifurcated 

bench trial. The court first heard evidence on the three child molesting charges 

and determined Wilder was guilty as charged. Next, the trial court heard 

evidence on the habitual offender sentencing enhancement and concluded that

Wilder was an habitual offender. Later, the court imposed a sixty-five-year 

sentence. Wilder now appeals.

Discussion and Decision

1. Sufficiency of the Evidence

[20] Wilder argues his convictions are based solely on A.B.’s testimony, which he 

characterizes as inconsistent and contradicted by other evidence. In response, 

the State asserts A.B.’s testimony should not be discounted and is sufficient to 

support Wilder’s convictions.

[21] In addressing a claim of insufficient evidence, an appellate court must consider 

only the probative evidence and reasonable inferences supporting the judgment, 

without weighing evidence or assessing witness credibility, and determine 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 7 of 13
therefrom whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the defendant 

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Turner v. State, 953 N.E.2d 1039, 1059 (Ind. 

2011). A conviction for child molesting may rest solely upon the 

uncorroborated testimony of the victim. Rose v. State, 36 N.E.3d 1055, 1061 

(Ind. Ct. App. 2015).

[22] Appellate courts may, however, apply the “incredible dubiosity” rule to 

impinge upon a fact finder’s function to assess the credibility of a witness. 

Turner, 953 N.E.2d at 1059. If a sole witness presents inherently improbable 

testimony and there is a complete lack of circumstantial evidence, a defendant’s 

conviction may be reversed. Love v. State, 761 N.E.2d 806, 810 (Ind. 2002). 

The fact that the victim may have made inconsistent statements does not make 

his or her trial testimony inherently improbable. Newsome v. State, 686 N.E.2d 

868, 875 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997).

[23] We further note that Wilder waived his right to a trial by jury and submitted his 

case to the trial judge for a decision. Trial judges are presumed to know the 

law, to apply the law to the facts and, in general, are able to weigh the impact of 

inconsistencies on a witness’s testimony. See Leggs v. State, 966 N.E.2d 204, 208 

(Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (“We presume the judge knows and will follow the 

applicable law.”).

[24] To convict Wilder of child molesting as a Class A felony, the State was required 

to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Wilder (1) a person at least twenty-one 

years of age (2) performed or submitted to sexual intercourse or deviate sexual 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 8 of 13
conduct (3) with A.B. (4) a child under fourteen years of age. Ind. Code § 35-

42-4-3.

[25] Here, A.B. testified unequivocally that on three occasions, Wilder, who was 

older than twenty-one years of age, sexually assaulted her by forcing her to 

submit to sexual intercourse when she was thirteen years of age. Parts of her 

testimony were corroborated by other evidence. Specifically, Wilder admitted 

to Johnson that he had sex with A.B. He also asked Johnson to give him a false 

alibi for the night of December 31, 2013. In addition, on December 31, 2013, 

Khloe saw Wilder kissing A.B. during the party. Finally, A.B.’s mother 

showed a police officer Wilder’s text message to A.B. instructing her to tell the 

police nothing. Based on the corroborating evidence, the incredible dubiosity 

rule does not apply to this case. See Carter v. State, 44 N.E.3d 47, 54 (Ind. Ct. 

App. 2015) (declining to determine the rape victim’s testimony was incredibly 

dubious because her testimony was supported by circumstantial evidence, 

including defendant’s admission to having sexual contact with the victim).

[26] Wilder points to apparently conflicting testimony about the December 31, 2013 

party. Specifically, A.B. testified that Wilder took her into a bedroom and 

sexually assaulted her. By contrast, Devin Dunn testified that during the night 

he went to the kitchen to get a beer, and as he passed through the living room 

he saw A.B. and Wilder by themselves. While he was in the kitchen, Wilder 

called out to him to stay in the kitchen for a minute. Dunn sat in the kitchen, 

drinking beer, and heard the sounds of people having sex in the living room. 

Later, Wilder came into the kitchen and told Dunn he was free to go. Dunn 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 9 of 13
walked through the living room, and A.B. was the only one there. Further, 

Khloe Clark testified that during the night she went into the living room and 

saw A.B. laying on the floor naked, and Wilder was also present. Dunn and 

Clark’s testimony tends to corroborate that Wilder had sex with A.B. Any 

discrepancies as to time and location were for the finder of fact to resolve. See 

Baber v. State, 870 N.E.2d 487, 490 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (finder of fact was in 

the best position to determine whether defendant could have molested the 

victim as described by the victim), trans. denied. The evidence is sufficient to 

sustain Wilder’s three convictions for child molestation.

2. Appropriateness of Sentence

[27] Wilder asks the Court to reduce his sentence to forty years. The State contends 

Wilder’s sentence is justifiable under the circumstances of the case and Wilder’s 

character.

[28] Article 7, section 6 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana authorizes the 

Court to review and revise sentences. This authority is implemented through 

Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B), which permits the Court to revise a sentence “if, 

after due consideration of the trial court’s decision, the Court finds that the 

sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character 

of the offender.”

[29] The principal purpose of sentencing review under Appellate Rule 7(B) is to level 

the outliers, not to achieve a perceived “correct” result in each case. Rose, 36 

N.E.3d at 1063. Our inquiry focuses on the defendant’s aggregate sentence, 

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 10 of 13
rather than the number of counts, the length of the sentence on any individual 

count, or whether any sentences are concurrent or consecutive. Remy v. State, 

17 N.E.3d 396, 401-402 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014), trans. denied. Whether a sentence 

is inappropriate turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the 

crime, any damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to 

light in a given case. Bratcher v. State, 999 N.E.2d 864, 870 (Ind. Ct. App. 

2013), trans. denied. It is the defendant’s burden to persuade the reviewing court 

that the sentence is inappropriate. Remy, 17 N.E.3d at 402.

[30] At the time Wilder committed his offenses, a Class A felony was punishable by 

a maximum sentence of fifty years, a minimum sentence of twenty years, and 

an advisory sentence of thirty years. Ind. Code § 35-50-2-4(a) (2014). In 

addition, a person found to be a habitual offender could be sentenced to a fixed 

term that was not less than the advisory sentence for the underlying offense nor 

more than three times the advisory sentence for the underlying offense, and in 

no case could exceed thirty years. Ind. Code § 35-50-2-8 (2005). The trial court 

sentenced Wilder to concurrent thirty-five year terms for each Class A felony 

conviction, enhanced by thirty years for the habitual offender determination, for 

an aggregate sentence of sixty-five years.

[31] Beginning with the nature of the offenses, Wilder had sexual intercourse with a 

thirteen-year-old on three separate days and occasions within the timespan of 

two months. On the first two occasions, A.B. was incapacitated due to 

intoxication and was thus especially vulnerable. On the night of December 31, 

2013, Wilder and A.B. were together for several hours before he sexually

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 11 of 13
molested her. He had ample opportunity to leave the incapacitated child alone, 

but he instead chose to prey on her. As for the second and third sexual 

molestations, Wilder could have desisted after the December 31, 2013 

molestation, but he chose to persist in his highly illegal conduct despite her 

physical and verbal resistance. He later texted A.B. to instruct her not to tell the 

police anything, which frightened A.B.

[32] Wilder inflicted severe emotional harm upon A.B., causing her to develop 

anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts to the point that she required 

inpatient and outpatient psychiatric treatment and medication. In addition, 

after Wilder was arrested, he undertook an extensive campaign to persuade 

others to malign and further harm thirteen-year-old A.B. by getting her high on 

illegal drugs and, once she was impaired, to get her to recant her allegations 

while being recorded.

[33] Turning to the character of the offender, Wilder, who was thirty-four years old 

at his sentencing hearing, has a lengthy criminal history. His habitual offender 

determination was based on a 1999 conviction for child molesting, a Class C 

felony, and a 2009 conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, a Class D 

felony. In addition, Wilder has fifteen misdemeanor convictions for offenses 

including failure to register as a sex offender, false informing, battery, criminal 

trespass, conversion, driving while suspended, and disorderly conduct. He 

accrued his convictions at a rate of one or two every few years, demonstrating 

an unwillingness to comply with the law for any period of time. Wilder also 

violated the terms of probation on two prior occasions.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 12 of 13
[34] Further, while Wilder was incarcerated and this case was pending, he arguably 

engaged in additional criminal conduct by attempting to recruit others to give a 

minor, A.B., controlled substances and record her in an impaired state. Wilder 

has failed to demonstrate that his sentence is inappropriate.

Conclusion

[35] For the reasons stated above, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

[36] Affirmed.

Riley, J., and Barnes, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 36A05-1512-CR-2278 | July 27, 2016 Page 13 of 13