alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.259

GMAC
FINANCIAL
SERVICES

               Fax

Date           January 28, 2004

Total Pages    1

From           John Wright

To             Todd Carter
Company        Brown & Brown Chevrolet
Fax Number     480-827-3215

Regarding      Meadow Valley Corporation

Message        This is to confirm our conversation regarding the four pending
               deliveries to Meadow Valley Corporation.

               GMAC is agreeable to financing four additional vehicles with a
               maximum amount to finance of $ 110,000.00 representing four
               vehicles at 80% of factory invoice for Retail terms to 60-months.

               Please call me if you have any questions or need additional
               information at 1-800-471-4622.

               Thank you,
               John

               PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

               The information contained in this facsimile is confidential and
               may also be attorney-client privileged. The information is
               intended only for the use of the individual or entry to whom it
               is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the agent
               or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,
               you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution
               or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
               have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify
               us by telephone and return the original message to us at the
               address below via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank You.

GMAC Financial Services
1301 West George Bush Highway Suite 140 Richardson, TX 75080
Telephone Number: 972-473-7018, Fax Number: 1-866-597-4798
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending July 23, 2011FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANCO BPI, S.A.                                                                                                         FBSEABanco BPI, S.A., Porto, Portugal, to establish  representative offices in Newark, New Jersey and Fall River, Massachusetts, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking Act of 1978, as amended and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableFNBNY BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                     * 3A1
#### In the Matter of Andre Moore, Petitioner, v Michael Gary, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[807 NYS2d 314]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Michael Gary, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to dismiss a criminal action entitled *People v Moore,*pending in that court under indictment No. 7461/04, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 is waived and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Julia Tetreault

Criminal No . 09-cr-16-04-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

31) filed by defendant Tetreault is granted in part ; continuance is

limited to 45 days .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : March 13, 200 9

cc : Richard Monteith, Jr ., Esq .

Jeffrey Levin, Esq .

Mark Howard, Esq .

Joseph Caulfield, Esq .

Mark Zuckerman, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00016-JD Document 33 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge John L. Kane

Civil Action No. 11-cv-2240-AP

DOLORES E. TAFOYA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER

Kane, J.

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings

(doc. #20), filed March 29, 2012, is GRANTED. 

This civil action is remanded to Defendant for additional administrative proceedings

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment in

accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in

Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).

Dated: March 29, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane

JOHN L. KANE, SENIOR JUDGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:11-cv-02240-JLK Document 21 Filed 03/29/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 909 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 12, 2008. 

Whereas in the fall of 1779, Haitian soldiers of the Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint Domingue volunteered to join 

in the fight for American independence; 

Whereas the unit was comprised of over 500 men of color 

from the island of Haiti; 

Whereas on October 9, 1779, the soldiers of ChasseursVolontaires de Saint Domingue served as the largest unit 

of soldiers of African descent to fight in the ‘‘Siege of Savannah’’; 

Whereas records show that over 500 men sailed treacherous 

waters to join the effort against the British; 

Whereas over 300 of them lost their lives attempting to drive 

the British from Savannah; 

Whereas the Savannah Monument, a project of the Haitian 

American Historical Society represents the Haitian soldiers that fought in the ‘‘Siege of Savannah’’; 

Whereas the Savannah Monument was erected in Savannah, 

Georgia on Monday, October 8, 2007, to recognize the 

Haitian involvement in the fight for American independence; and 
2 

•HRES 909 EH 

Whereas the Savannah Monument includes a statue of a 12- 

year-old drummer boy, depicting Mr. Henri Christophe, 

who became a leader in Haiti’s Revolution to gain independence and renounce slavery: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commemorates the courage of the Haitian soldiers that fought for 

American independence in the ‘‘Siege of Savannah’’ and for 

Haiti’s independence and renunciation of slavery. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, August 3-7, 2009Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,261,464 75,221 135,527 449,624 370,955 88,423 3,4Number of loans 26,591 1,673 3,602 11,021 5,056 1,062 2Weighted average maturity (months)1 18.68 53.63 20.23 15.07 18.64 6.22 102.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.24 24.16 9.09 5.08 6.99 .23 101.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.23 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 4.87 6.41 5.59 4.91 4.16 4.05 7. Standard error5 .20 .30 .33 .44 .35 .74 .7

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.18 7.11 6.27 6.45 5.09 4.88 7. 25th percentile 3.33 5.39 5.06 3.25 2.66 2.91 6. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.11 5.38 6.07 5.06 4.09 2.94 5.0 Other livestock 6.91 4.51 5.52 3.22 3.78 5.78 6. Other current operating expenses7 5.97 5.45 5.47 4.53 4.33 6.30 5.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.63 6.40 5.95 5.35 3.15 8.29 5. Farm real estate 6.52 5.48 5.35 5.17 n.a. 7.18 6. Other8 7.53 5.78 3.43 3.58 4.46 7.26 4.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 73.96 29.80 58.97 75.65 86.41 95.88 5.4 Under commitment 76.97 45.99 68.19 84.47 86.34 97.62 4.2 Callable 16.59 20.73 15.79 29.71 7.06 .97 2. Subject to prepayment penalty 19.83 .14 4.26 17.22 32.07 52.71 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.35 13.36 21.62 3.91 1.52 12.46 n Other livestock 8.38 6.20 4.59 1.76 16.65 23.87 7.5 Other current operating expenses7 52.96 32.62 60.52 56.83 52.96 37.13 10.2 Farm machinery and equipment 5.00 10.66 3.80 4.61 5.39 .95 15. Farm real estate 4.94 18.87 5.53 5.38 2.02 n.a. 44. Other8 20.37 18.30 3.95 27.51 21.47 25.58 22.0

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 15.12 24.92 20.00 17.12 11.70 3.69 61.7 Other 82.90 74.04 75.54 80.58 86.84 96.00 36.5 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00029-CR

Gerald Wayne Roberts

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

21st District Court of Burleson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13,646

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 9, 2016
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2008...... 13.8 9.5 12.3 9.1 30.6 21.7 9.2 11.1 12.6 14.6 2005: Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0 2008: Q1... 13.9 10.7 15.9 9.7 38.0 20.2 9.1 12.2 13.6 14.3  Q2... 14.8 8.2 8.9 9.7 24.4 25.7 10.7 11.7 11.9 16.3  Q3... 14.8 8.6 13.2 9.2 34.6 22.5 9.0 11.1 13.9 15.6  Q4... 12.0 9.7 11.7 7.6 29.2 18.7 7.9 9.5 11.5 12.5 2009: Q1... 10.8 9.7 9.6 8.3 36.8 14.0 9.6 12.5 14.6 9.9  Q2... 11.8 12.6 7.5 9.8 31.7 14.6 10.0 11.9 12.6 11.7  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### C. M.. GAY, as Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Milton D. WILSON, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Nov. 19, 1954.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., T. Paine Kelly, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

J. Lewis Hall, Tallahássee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Gay v. Blocker, Fla. 1954, *73*So.2d 855.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, HOB-SON and DREW, JJ., concur.
#### Marlena A. Wierzbicki, Respondent, v Philip T. Mathew, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 446]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated January 26, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), the defendant failed to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955). The affirmed reports of the defendant’s medical experts did not set forth the objective tests they performed during their examinations of the plaintiff which led them to conclude that she did not suffer a limitation to the range of motion in her *401neck *(see Junco v Ranzi,*288 AD2d 440). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1539 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1539

                For the relief of Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2001

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GHASSAN MOHAMAD RAJEH.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa of for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa of permanent residence to Ghassan Mohamad Rajeh, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ghassan 
Mohamad Rajeh shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

                      For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2001

 Ms. Woolsey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ZHENFU GE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Zhenfu Ge shall be eligible 
for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that 
of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Zhenfu Ge enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Zhenfu Ge, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2109 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2109

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible 
                 inclusion in the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to 
as ``the Secretary'') shall conduct a study of Virginia Key Beach Park 
in Biscayne Bay, Florida, which was used for recreation by African 
Americans at a time when public beaches were racially segregated by 
law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of the site and 
the suitability and feasibility of establishing the site as a unit of 
the National Park System.
    (b) Criteria.--In conducting the study required by subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for 
potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in section 8 
of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5; popularly known as the National 
Park System General Authorities Act).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall transmit to the 
Congress a report on the findings of the study and the conclusions and 
recommendations of the Secretary.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


2008 Travel and Relocation Innovation Award

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is announcing the 
2008 Travel and Relocation Innovation Award. This award will recognize 
masters of travel and/or relocation management.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Go to GSA's 2008 Travel and Relocation 
Innovation Award at http://www.gsa.gov/travelrelocationaward or contact 
Jane Groat, Travel Management Policy, Office of Travel, Transportation, 
and Asset Management (MT), General Services Administration, Washington, 
DC 20405, (202) 501-4318, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#482229262d662f3a27293c082f3b29662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb6bdb2b9f2bbaeb3bda89cbbafbdf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Travel Regulation is contained 
in Title, 41 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR Chapters 300 through 
304), and implements statutory requirements and executive branch 
policies for travel and relocation by Federal civilian employees and 
others authorized to travel and relocate at Government expense.
    GSA announces an award to recognize and honor excellence in Federal 
travel and relocation. This award, available to all Federal employees, 
will honor individuals and/or teams. In addition to cash awards, one or 
more entries may receive honorable mention. Entries must be received no 
later than March 31, 2008.
    Announcement and presentation of winners will be at the National 
Travel Forum 2008 (June 3-6, 2008; Atlanta, GA; http://www.nationaltravelforum.org).

    Dated: January 29, 2008.
Patrick McConnell,
Acting Director, Travel Management Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-2217 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>