alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 192 (Thursday, October 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57372-57373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Immune Cells in Hepatic Injury and 
Transplantation.
    Date: October 23, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f392625273c0f21262e262b6121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="493f2023213a09272028202d67272021672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856,

[[Page 57373]]

Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-22846 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Sarah B. OSBORNE v. MOSSLER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al.

No. 2772.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1946.

J. S. Pickett, of Many, for appellant.

S. I. Foster, of Leesville, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Osborne v. Mossier Acceptance Corporation et al., La.App., 24 So.2d 655, it is ordered that the appeal in the above entitled case be and the same is hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6860
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLINTON F. TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-58, CA-95-23-NN) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Francis McQuaid Lawrence, ST. JOHN, BOWLING & LAWRENCE, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Harvey Lee Bryant, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), ame nded by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Taylor , Nos. CR-91-58; CA-95-23-NN (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 1 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 2 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 3 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 4 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 5 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 6 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 7 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 8 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 9 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 10 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 11 of 12

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL   Document 11   Filed 03/31/09   Page 12 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.6999
<CASH>                                          41,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,785
<PP&E>                                         170,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                 102,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,777
<BONDS>                                          7,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       121,425
<OTHER-SE>                                     (16,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,882
<SALES>                                         52,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,635
<CGS>                                           61,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (42,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,968)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (40,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (40,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
#### Florence Linett, Appellant, v Budget Rent-A-Car, Respondent.

[744 NYS2d 180]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 24, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff tripped over the base of a chair on defendant’s premises, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Plaintiff claims that the chair in question, which was in a waiting area facing the counter where defendant serviced its customers, had a metal or steel base support that protruded about four to six inches beyond the front edge of the chair’s two seats and was not flush with the floor, and in which her shoe got caught as she got up out of the chair. The evidence, including the testimony of defendant’s manager that defendant placed the chair in its office, raises an issue of fact as to whether defendant created a dangerous or defective condition on its premises *(compare, Guerrieri v Summa,*193 AD2d 647). Concur — Williams, P.J., Andrias, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT



	
Exhibit 10.51

	 
	
Amendment to Service Agreement

	 
	 
	
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to SERVICE AGREEMENT ("Amendment No. 2) is made as of the 1st day of May, 2003

	 
	
BETWEEN:

	 
	
1)
	
WARWICK INTERNATIONAL GROUP LIMITED whose registered office is currently at 

	 	
Mostyn, Holywell, Flintshire CH8 9HE, United Kingdom (the "Company"); and

	 
	
2)
	
Mr Robert F Ellis of Orchard House, 8 The Steadings, Wicker Lane, Guilden Sutton, 

	 	
Chester CH3 7EL (the "Executive")

	 
	
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have entered into a Service Agreement dated as of the 1st day of May, 1995 (the "Service Agreement"); and Amendment No. 1 to Service Agreement dated 1st July 1999;

	 
	
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Service Agreement;

	 
	
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual representations, warranties, and covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:-

	 
	
1.
	
Preamble - Section 1 of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 is 

	 	
superceded by the Employment Rights Act 1996.

	 
	
2.
	
Section 4.4 of the Service Agreement is changed to:-

	 
	
"In the event that the Company should be controlled by another company or companies outside the Warwick Group acting pursuant to an agreement to which Section 204 of the Companies Act 1985 would have effect then notwithstanding any other term of this Agreement and for a maximum period of thirty six months only after such a change of control the Executive shall be entitled to receive from the Company 36 months written notice of any termination upon notice, and should the Company terminate the Agreement other than in accordance with Clause 19.4 the Executive shall not be obliged to work out his notice and shall further be entitled to liquidated damages in the sum of seventy five per cent of the average aggregate of the Executive's then current gross salary entitlement under Clause 6.1 below together with the Executive's gross bonus paid under Clause 6.2 below in respect of the 3 full Financial Years preceding the termination such average aggregate being multiplied by a factor of 3.0 to reflect the said period of thirty six months by way of compensation for loss of office."

	 
	
3.
	
10.1   Private Health Insurance - The Company will pay for private health insurance for the Executive, his spouse or partner and dependent children.

	 
	 	
This clause shall be enforceable by the Executive's spouse or partner or dependents under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

	 
	
SIGNED on behalf of the Company:
	
/s/ S. J. Watt-Smith, Company Secretary

	
Date: March 23, 2004

	 
	
SIGNED by the Executive:
	
/s/ Robert F. Ellis

	
Date:  March 23, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending October 20, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAJJ BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                       * 18C
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12

Prime Succession, Inc. and subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Thousands)


                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                               March 31,
                                                               ---------
                                                          2000           1999
                                                          ----           ----
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Earnings:
         Income (loss) before income taxes               $(4,210)     $   224
         Add: Fixed charges, net                           6,613        6,092

Income before income taxes and fixed charges, net          2,403        6,316

Fixed Charges:
         Total interest (1)                                6,314        5,852
         Interest factor in rents(2)                         299          240

                  Total fixed charges                      6,613        6,092

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           .36         1.04

Coverage deficiency (surplus) (3)                          4,210         (224)

FN


(1)   Total  interest  expense for each  period  includes  amortization  of loan
      costs.


(2)   Interest factor in rents represents one-third of rent expense,  which
      is considered representative of the interest factor.

(3)   The  Company's  earnings are  inadequate  to cover fixed charges for three
      months  ended March 31, 2000 and are  adequate to cover fixed  charges for
      the three months ended March 31, 1999. Coverage deficiency  represents the
      excess of fixed charges over income before income taxes and fixed charges,
      net. Coverage surplus  represents the excess of income before income taxes
      and fixed charges, net over fixed charges.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168

To suspend temporarily the duty on bitolylene diisocyanate (TODI).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 2001

Mr. SUNUNU introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on bitolylene diisocyanate

(TODI).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BITOLYLENE DIISOCYANATE (TODI).

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.48 Bitolylene diisocyanate (TODI) (CAS

No. 91–97–4) (provided for in subheading 2929.10.20) .......................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2005 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or
2

•HR 2168 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1

 In criminal cases originating from the Grand Junction or Durango Jury Divisions of this Court, counsel

shall be prepared to advise the Court at the time of the change of plea hearing whether a written request to have the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Honorable Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00357-MSK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. TROY A. ASHLEY; and

2. BRANDON D. SMITH,

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA AND SENTENCING HEARINGS

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court following the filing of a Notice of Disposition 

(#33) on November 14, 2011, by Defendant Troy A. Ashley. The Court construes this Notice as

a motion to change his plea and to have the Court consider the terms of the parties’ plea

agreement.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F) and (I), the speedy trial clock is tolled

pending determination of those matters. 

2. A Change of Plea hearing is set for December 28, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. and a

Sentencing hearing is set for April 2, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. in the United States

District Court for the District of Colorado, Courtroom A901, Alfred A. Arraj U.S.

Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.1
sentencing hearing conducted at the courthouse in either Grand Junction or Durango will be filed. See

Administrative Order 2007-8.

3. The final trial preparation conference set for December 16, 2011, and the

December 19, 2011, trial date are VACATED.

Dated this 16th day of November, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nellys Montano, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 640]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered August 7, 2003, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of enterprise corruption, and sentencing her to a term of IV2 to 4V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s unpreserved challenge to the validity of her plea does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement *(see People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725 [1995]; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to reach this claim in the interest of justice, we would find that the record establishes the voluntariness of the plea. Since defendant expressly stated that she spoke and understood English, and indeed demonstrated that fact, there was no reason to provide an interpreter. The record refutes defendant’s assertion that the court misinformed her about the immigration consequences of her plea *(see*CPL 220.50 [7]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 3 Motor Vehicle Assemblies  Item
2012Average
2012
2013Q1
2012Dec.
2013Q2
Q3
Q4
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
MayTotal
10.33
10.44
10.31
10.46
10.71
10.91
10.45
10.72
10.96
11.00
11.04Autos
4.11
4.17
4.26
4.13
4.37
4.15
4.31
4.32
4.48
4.38
4.38Trucks
6.23
6.27
6.05
6.32
6.34
6.76
6.14
6.41
6.48
6.61
6.67Light
5.96
5.98
5.79
6.08
6.11
6.50
5.92
6.18
6.24
6.36
6.37Medium and heavy
.27
.29
.26
.24
.23
.27
.22
.23
.24
.26
.29Memo:Autos and light trucks
10.06
10.15
10.05
10.21
10.48
10.64
10.23
10.49
10.72
10.74
10.75      Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 21st meeting of the American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). 

# DATES:

October 17, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern]. 

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference  Room 1114. Please use the C Street entrance closest to 3rd Street and bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how health information technology can provide the data needed for the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can improve performance on those quality measures. 

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality/​quality_​instruct.html*.                 

Dated: September 12, 2008. 

Judith Sparrow, 

Director, American Health Information Community,  Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. E8-22029 Filed 9-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150-45-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-70628, 33-75184, 333 -28135, 333-42424 and 333-108208) of
Calton, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2006 relating to the financial
statements for the year ended November 30, 2005 and 2004 which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2005.




                                        /s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.




Tampa, Florida
February 3, 2006
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
      Arthur
      Nadata, Chief Executive Officer of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp., certify
      that:





The
      Form
      10-K of Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. for the period ended February 29, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and


The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. for the periods presented.


/s/ Arthur
              NadataArthur
              NadataChairman
              of the
              Board and CEODate: May 12, 2008








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Nu Horizons Electronics Corp. and will be retained by Nu Horizons Electronics
      Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon
      request.