alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 909 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 909

   Commemorating the courage of the Haitian soldiers that fought for 
  American independence in the ``Siege of Savannah'' and for Haiti's 
               independence and renunciation of slavery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

   Mr. Meek of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commemorating the courage of the Haitian soldiers that fought for 
  American independence in the ``Siege of Savannah'' and for Haiti's 
               independence and renunciation of slavery.

Whereas in the fall of 1779, Haitian soldiers of the Chasseurs-Volontaires de 
        Saint Domingue volunteered to join in the fight for American 
        independence;
Whereas the unit was comprised of over 500 men of color from the island of 
        Haiti;
Whereas on October 9, 1779, the soldiers of Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint 
        Domingue served as the largest unit of soldiers of African descent to 
        fight in the ``Siege of Savannah'';
Whereas records show that over 500 men sailed treacherous waters to join the 
        effort against the British;
Whereas over 300 of them lost their lives attempting to drive the British from 
        Savannah;
Whereas the Savannah Monument, a project of the Haitian American Historical 
        Society represents the Haitian soldiers that fought in the ``Siege of 
        Savannah'';
Whereas the Savannah Monument was erected in Savannah, Georgia on Monday, 
        October 8, 2007, to recognize the Haitian involvement in the fight for 
        American independence; and
Whereas the Savannah Monument includes a statute of a 12-year-old drummer boy, 
        depicting Mr. Henri Christophe, who became a leader in Haiti's 
        Revolution to gain independence and renounce slavery: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commemorates the 
courage of the Haitian soldiers that fought for American independence 
in the ``Siege of Savannah'' and for Haiti's independence and 
renunciation of slavery.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7734

DARRELL ANTONIO GUMBS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant – Appellee, 

 and 

HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of the B.O.P. in his individual 

and official capacity; Y. APONTE, AHSA at FCC Petersburg - 

Low in both her individual and official capacity; ELIZABETH 

PANAGUITON, P/A at FCC Petersburg - Low in both her 

individual and official capacity; K. LAYBOURN, FCC 

Petersburg-Low in both her individual and official capacity; 

V. ADAMS, Warden at FCC Petersburg in both her individual 

and official capacity; KIM WHITE, Regional Director of the 

Eastern District in both her individual and official 

capacity; HARRELL WATTS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator 

of the Bureau of Prisons Central Office (for 6/8/2005 - name 

unknown) in both his/her individual and official 

capacities, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District 

Judge. (2:06-cv-00148-RBS-FBS) 

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008 
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Darrell Antonio Gumbs, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, 

III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Darrell Antonio Gumbs appeals the district court’s 

final order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. While the magistrate 

judge advised Gumbs that failure to timely file specific written 

objections to the report would result in waiver of the right to 

appeal from the district court’s judgment, Gumbs failed to file 

any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. Therefore, Gumbs waived appellate review of his 

claims. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 

(4th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 3032 (2007). Moreover, 

Gumbs’ claims of attorney error provide no basis for relief. 

See Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 

(5th Cir. 1986) (holding that there is no right to effective 

assistance of counsel in civil cases). Accordingly, we affirm. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.1.4

Exhibit A
SCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,
ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTS
AND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS

|Date Admitted         |  | Name and address of partners                                              |  | Value of non-
cash capital
contribution |            | Partnership
units issued |           | Approx.
Percentage
Interests |       | Federal ID #
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------ | --------- | ---------------------------- | ----- | ------------
|05/22/1998(1)         |  | Eagle Ridge Resort LLC
37 West 57th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10019 |  | $                                       | 1,198,750  |                          | 35,794    |                              | 0.49  | %           
|02/04/1997            |  | GTA LP, Inc.
14 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                       |           |                          | 7,302,479 |                              | 99.31 | %           
|02/04/1997            |  | GTA GP, Inc.
14 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                       |           |                          | 14,684    |                              | 0.20  | %           
|                      |  |                                                                           |  |                                         |            |                          |           |                              |       |             
|Total Common OP Units |  |                                                                           |  |                                         | 7,352,957  |                          | 100.00    | %                            |      
|                      |  |                                                                           |  |                                         |            |                          |           |                              |       |             
|                      |  | GTA LP, Inc.
10 North Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401                  |  | $                                       | 20,000,000 |                          | 800,000   |                              | 100   | %           

---

---
U.S. DISTR/CT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

ORIGINA L SEP08 2:J 

FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Karen L. Bartlett 

v. Civil No. 08-cv-358-JL 

Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 

VERDICT FORM 

LIABILITY: Do you find, by a preponderance of the evidence, 

that Mrs. Bartlett has proven her claim against Mutual for strict 

products liability? 

(YQS or No] 

(If your answer to the Liability question is "Yes, " then proceed 

to the Damages questions on the next page. If your answer to the 

Liability question is "No," then you must conclude your 

deliberations.) 

-Page 1 of 2-

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 381 Filed 09/08/10 Page 1 of 2
DAMAGES: What amount of compensatory damages, if any, do 

you award to Mrs. Bartlett on her claim for strict products 

liability? Please state the amounts, if any, for each of the 

following categories, and then state the total amount on the 

bottom line. State the amounts in words, not figures. 

(1) Past medical expenses: 

(2) Future medical expenses: 

(3) Lost wages: 

•^MuudZu 

(4) Pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life: 

TOTAL DAMAGES (total of the four categories above): 

(This concludes your deliberations.) 

Foreperson 

Date 

-Page 2 of 2-

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 381 Filed 09/08/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (313)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,428
<PP&E>                                           1,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (270)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,784
<BONDS>                                         14,012
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,335
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,049
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   313
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,084
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.86)
        

</TABLE>
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2006 Q4 survey,

region share of national

total 2.9 9.0 26.6 22.2 7.5 5.2 5.1 8.5 5.3 7.7

Sample coverage, 2006 Q4

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 10.1 5.4 18.7 33.3 19.9 12.1 8.9 6.0 9.2 28.3

Avg. loan size, 2006 Q4 survey

(thousands of dollars) 101.0 44.5 117.4 76.8 63.8 104.2 57.4 47.7 33.0 72.3

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2001: Q4 6.9 7.9 6.3 7.0 5.2 6.3 8.7 7.6 6.1 5.2

2002: Q1 6.9 7.8 6.7 7.2 5.2 5.5 7.3 7.4 6.8 4.9

Q2 6.8 7.4 6.4 7.2 5.0 5.9 7.6 7.5 6.5 5.1

Q3 6.4 7.5 5.8 6.5 4.6 6.0 7.5 7.3 6.5 5.3

Q4 5.7 6.9 5.1 5.5 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.6 6.4 4.5

2003: Q1 5.3 7.0 5.6 5.7 4.4 5.6 6.7 7.4 6.1 4.5

Q2 6.0 6.7 5.3 6.5 4.6 6.1 7.3 5.7 6.4 5.2

Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

(0.19) (0.16) (0.14) (0.71) (0.60) (0.67) (0.34) (0.59) (0.17) (0.15)

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

(0.19) (0.21) (0.77) (0.75) (0.28) (0.65) (0.33) (0.19) (0.05) (0.18)

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

(0.18) (0.23) (0.28) (0.70) (0.20) (0.57) (0.43) (0.30) (0.09) (0.07)

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

(0.80) (0.19) (0.35) (0.45) (0.23) (0.58) (0.49) (0.10) (0.07) (0.16)

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

(0.29) (0.15) (0.21) (0.37) (0.13) (0.37) (0.29) (0.12) (0.26) (0.25)

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

(0.47) (0.18) (0.40) (0.54) (0.15) (0.53) (0.13) (0.26) (0.26) (0.17)

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

(0.58) (0.16) (0.12) (0.38) (0.30) (0.28) (0.29) (0.17) (0.21) (0.21)

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

(0.26) (0.24) (0.53) (0.38) (0.32) (0.63) (0.17) (0.18) (0.31) (0.14)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02259-RPM

JACQULYN BISHOP,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and

YELLOW BOOK GROUP INSURANCE PLAN,

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

____________________________________________________________________________

 

Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on January 12, 2012, at 11:00 a.m.

in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States Courthouse, 1823 Stout

Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with the Instructions for Preparation of

Scheduling Order which may be found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges/judges.aspx

(Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Procedures) and use the format provided with those instructions

(Rev. 1/08). The proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers

by 4:00 p.m. on January 5, 2012.

 The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in person. No parties or

representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.

Dated: November 23rd, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

 ________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02259-RPM Document 8 Filed 11/23/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         140,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,080,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   133,119
<INVENTORY>                                    261,702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,690,134
<PP&E>                                       1,163,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                 976,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,934,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,662,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        225
<COMMON>                                        24,570
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,076,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,934,504
<SALES>                                        316,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,278
<CGS>                                          332,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (97,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (97,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 57093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1864-083-MI]


Upper Peninsula Power Company; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

September 25, 2008.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed Upper Peninsula Power Company's proposed shoreline management 
plan for the Bond Falls Hydroelectric Project, located on the Ontonagon 
River in Ontonagon and Gogebic Counties, Michigan, and Vilas County, 
Wisconsin, and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA).
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number (P-1864) excluding the last three digits in the docket 
number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d1d2c5d4d8f9fbfef9f2c4e2e7e7f8e5e3d7f1f2e5f4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-
3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Any comments on the EA should be filed by October 27, 2008 and 
should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. 
Please reference the project name and project number (P-1864) on all 
comments. Comments may be filed electronically via Internet in lieu of 
paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web 
site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further information, contact Jon 
Cofrancesco at (202) 502-8951.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23065 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-96-PB

Anthony Sawyer

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for March 3, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to complete discovery including analysis of prior criminal

history and obtaining medical records. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from March 3, 2009 to May 5, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00096-PB Document 23 Filed 02/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 18, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 21, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 18, 2009

cc: Stanley Norkunas, Esq.

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00096-PB Document 23 Filed 02/18/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit  99.3


CERTIFICATION  OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of Pizza Inn, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-K  for  the  year  ended  June 29, 2003 as filed with Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Ronald W. Parker, President and
Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m  or  78o(d)); and

2.     I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  the Company;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

4.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Pizza  Inn,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by Pizza Inn, Inc. and
furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  September 25, 2003                              ______________________________
                                                            /s/ Ronald W. Parker
                                                                Ronald W. Parker
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer