alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, 

STATE OF COLORADO 

100 Jefferson County Parkway 

Golden, Colorado 80401 

Phone: (303) 271-6145 

Plaintiff: BANK OF CHOICE, a Colorado corporation, 

v. 

Defendants: CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL 

CENTER, LTD., LLLP, a Colorado limited liability 

limited partnership, and RANDOLPH G. CURRIER, 

an individual. ▲ COURT USE ONLY ▲

 Case No.: 2010 CV 5138 

Div.: 3 Ctrm: 4F 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW ADMISSIONS 

 THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to 

Withdraw Admissions, and having reviewed the pleadings and being fully advised in the 

premises, hereby FINDS: 

(a) Defendants’ ability to address the merits of the action will be subserved if 

Defendants’ Admissions were to be presumed admitted; and 

(b) Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by maintaining his action or defense on the merits. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants presumptive admissions are withdrawn 

and the Court hereby enters the substance of the admissions served upon Plaintiff. 

 Dated: April ____, 2011. BY THE COURT: 

 

 Jane A. Tidball 

 District Court Judge 

GRANTED The moving party is hereby ORDERED 

to provide a copy of this Order to any pro 

se parties who have entered an 

appearance in this action within 10 days 

from the date of this order. 

___________________________ 

Jane Tidball 

Jefferson District Court Judge 

EFILED Document DATE OF ORDER INDICATED ON ATTACHMENT

CO Jefferson County District Court 1st JD 

Filing Date: Apr 5 2011 4:51PM MDT 

Filing ID: 36873922 

Review Clerk: Luz R

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 13 Filed 08/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
/s/ Judge Jane A Tidball 

Court: CO Jefferson County District Court 1st JD 

Judge: Jane A Tidball 

Alternate Judge: Unassigned 

File & Serve 

Transaction ID: 36820494 

Current Date: Apr 05, 2011 

Case Number: 2010CV5138 

Case Name: BANK OF CHOICE vs. CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL CENTER LTD LLLP et al 

Court Authorizer: Jane A Tidball 

Case 1:11-cv-02286-REB-CBS Document 13 Filed 08/31/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: January 08, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 209 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 209

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
 interest shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of 
           Social Security benefits included in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that tax-exempt 
 interest shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of 
           Social Security benefits included in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors Tax Equity Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              TAXATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by striking ``gross income--'' and all 
that follows and inserting ``gross income determined without regard to 
this section and sections 135, 137, 221, 911, 931, and 933.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




August 9, 2005                         /s/ RICHARD J. LAMPEN
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard J. Lampen
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: WILLIAM ROBERT NORRIE,

Debtor.

______________________________

WILLIAM ROBERT NORRIE,

Appellant,

v.

KELLY MALLEN,

Appellee. No. 18

- 55550

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 08522

- AB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 15, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor William Robert Norrie appeals pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing his bankruptcy appeal for failure to comply with court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 55550

orders and failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § § 158 (d)

and 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza , 291 F.3d

639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Norrie’s appeal

after Norrie faile d to file the documents required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy

Procedure 8009 , despite the district court’s warning that noncompliance may result

in dismissal

. See id. at 640

- 43 (discussing factors to be considered before

dismissing a case for failure to comply with a court order; a district court’s

dismissal should not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it

“committed a clear error or judgment” (citations and internal quotation marks

omitted); Ferdik v. Bonzelet , 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992) ( this court may

review the record independently if the district court does not make explicit findings

to show its consideration of the factors)

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Norrie’s motion for

reconsideration because Norrie failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. See Fed.

R. Bankr. P. 9023, 9024 (making Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 and 60 applicable to

bankruptcy cases); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty, Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d

1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) (setti ng forth standard of review and grounds for relief

under Rule 59 or 60 ).

Norrie’s request for judicial notice , included at Docket Entry No. 6, is3 18

- 55550

denied as unnecessary

.

AFFIRMED.
**NO COPY OF THIS TRANSCRIPT MAY BE MADE PRIOR TO 2/12/09 

 1 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 * 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * 

 * 07-CR-189-01-GZS 

 v. * October 28, 2008 

 * 

 DANIEL RILEY * 

 * 

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 EXCERPT OF TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING 

 BEFORE THE HONORABLE GEORGE Z. SINGAL 

 Appearances: 

 For the Government: Arnold Huftalen, AUSA 

 Robert Kinsella, AUSA 

 U.S. Attorney's Office 

 53 Pleasant Street 

 Concord, NH 03301 

 For Daniel Riley: Sven Wiberg, Esq. 

 Wiberg Law Office, PLLC 

 2456 Lafayette Road 

 Portsmouth, NH 03801 

 For Probation: Melissa Elworthy 

 Court Reporter: Diane M. Churas, CSR, CRR 

 Official Court Reporter 

 U.S. District Court 

 55 Pleasant Street 

 Concord, NH 03301 

 (603) 225-1442 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 567 Filed 11/14/08 Page 1 of 3
 2 

 1 THE DEFENDANT: I took an educated guess and 

 2 issued $20 million in credit to this Court, which it 

 3 violates its own statutes. And I'd also like to say 

 4 that the unlawful venue -- I've never seen a case be 

 5 brought in two different states in two different venues 

 6 in violation -- you are up there today reading statutes, 

 7 18 USC this and naming them off when that lady was on 

 8 the stand, but yet when I name the statute 18 USC 3232 

 9 that tells that all proceedings must be held within the 

 10 district of the alleged offense, but yet you take me to 

 11 Maine. As I read that statute, it's now frivolous. So 

 12 you pick and choose what statute you want to abide by. 

 13 You're biased. You're partial. You don't care about 

 14 justice. All you care about is getting a conviction on 

 15 the defendant -- which let the record reflect that I'm 

 16 holding up the title to the trust account, which is the 

 17 defendant. All you care about is getting this 

 18 commercial lien on this defendant so you can raid that 

 19 trust account and issue your penal bonds and your Miller 

 20 Act bonds and sell them to the Corrections Corporation 

 21 of America who underwrites them through banks and sells 

 22 them on the stock market for millions and millions of 

 23 dollars. That's what's going on here. 

 24 (End of excerpt.) 

 25 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 567 Filed 11/14/08 Page 2 of 3
 3 

 1 C E R T I F I C A T E 

 2 

 3 I, Diane M. Churas, do hereby certify that the 

 4 foregoing transcript is a true and accurate 

 5 transcription of the within proceedings, to the best of 

 6 my knowledge, skill, ability and belief. 

 7 

 Submitted: 11/14/08 

 8 

 /s/ Diane M. Churas __ 

 9 DIANE M. CHURAS, CSR, CRR 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

 21 

 22 

 23 

 24 

 25 

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS Document 567 Filed 11/14/08 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARY OF THE REGISTRANT
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Percentage of                Jurisdiction
     Name of Subsidiary                      Stock Owned               of Incorporation
     ------------------                     -------------             ----------------
<S>                                         <C>                        <C>
 1.  Gulf Southwest Nevada Bancorp, Inc.         100.0%                    Nevada


     Subsidiary of Gulf Southwest           Percentage of              Jurisdiction
         Nevada Bancorp, Inc.                Stock Owned              of Incorporation
     ----------------------------           -------------             ----------------
 1.    Merchants Bank                            100.0%                    Texas

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 82940



# FILE MAGNIFICO PLAYA, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ARRIENDO ADVISORS, LTD., A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND KRISTOPHER KENT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MANAGING MEMBER, Petitioners, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE LYNNE K. SIMONS, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND AM-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition challenges several orders related to a district court's denial of a motion to dismiss in a contract and tort action. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted);Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is



### 2- oluiciS" SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

161 I947A &gait,J.

an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). We therefore,

ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J. Parraguirre


## do 41-, J. Haraesty

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP/Reno Meruelo Group LLC Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) I 947A
Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11



Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share/Unit

For the Periods



|                                                     |  | July 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003 |           |   | January 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003 |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ------------------------------------------ | -
|                                                     |  | (unaudited)                             |           |   | (unaudited)                                |  
|Net Income (Loss)                                    |  | $                                       | (44,490   | ) |                                            | $
|                                                     |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |  
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding |  |                                         | 4,222,870 |   |                                            |  
|                                                     |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Common Share                     |  | $                                       | (0.01     | ) |                                            | $
|                                                     |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |  



|                                             |  | July 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002 |           |   | January 1, 2002 through September 30, 2002 |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ------------------------------------------ | -
|                                             |  | (unaudited)                             |           |   | (unaudited)                                |  
|Net Income (Loss)                            |  | $                                       | (68,273   | ) |                                            | $
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |  
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                         | 4,222,870 |   |                                            |  
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                       | (0.02     | ) |                                            | $
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                            |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending November 20, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAMERISERV FINANCIAL BANK                                                                                                * BranchAmeriServ Financial Bank, Johnstown, PA, to establish a branch office located at 1857 North Atherton Street, State College, PA.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableWARBURG PINCUS PRIVATE EQUITY X, L.P.                                                                                   CICWarburg Pincus Private Equity S, L.P., New York, NY, to acquire up to 19.7% of National Penn Bancshares, Inc, Boyertown, PA.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/08/2010
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 18, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6951** 

WILMER JEROME KNIGHT , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. OFFICER SHEPPHERD; OFFICER PARKS , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. ( 7:14

- cv - 00687

- GEC

- RSB )

Submitted : November 13, 2015 Decided: January 6, 2016

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Wilmer Jerome Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wilmer Jerome Knight appeals the distric t court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Knight v. Sheppherd , No. 7:14

- cv - 00687

- GEC

- RSB (W.D. Va. May 22, 2015) . We deny Knight’s motions for reconsideration, to vacate, for judgment and for appointment of counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED