September 4, 2009 UCC-1#2007009134K

00982 1

For: James Starr, d/b/a Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

55 Pleasant St.

Concord N.H. [03301]

From: Edward-Lewis:Brown©, Creditor

Elaine-Alice :Brown©, Creditor

clo 266 County Farm Rd.

Dover, N.H. [03820]

0

~~.

~

.P~

RE: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v . EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWIr

Case #06-CR-00071-01t02-SM, 09-CR-00030-01102-GZ S

Notice of Refusal of Judgmen t

Edward-Lewis:Brown© and Elaine-Alice :Brown©, living, sentient, flesh-and-blood man

and woman, Creditors and Secured Parties for the legal fictions, EDWARD BROWN and

ELAINE BROWN, with unlimited commercial liability, are neither the sureties nor the

accommodation parties for the above noted legal fictions. We hereby aver that we refuse

for cause without dishonor the judgment of this court.

Causes:

The court's obvious bias against the defendants, EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE

BROWN, and against Edward-Lewis :Brown(D and Elaine-Alice :Brown(D.

The court's obvious bias in favor of the U .S . Attorneys.

The court's denial of all pre-trial notices.

The court's denial of all pre-trial affidavits to the U .S . Attorney, allowing the U .S.

Attorney to fail to rebut said affidavits without accountability, in violation of law .

The court's refusal ofjustification testimony by the Creditors.

The court's refusal to prove jurisdiction when challenged, as required by law.

The court's conducting barratry along with the U.S. Attorney.

The judge's offensive and rude remarks to the defendants' witnesses.

Case 1:09-cr-00030-GZS Document 201 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 1 of 3
The jury selection process being inappropriate and staged, consisting of those of

predetermined bias against the defendants.

The denial ofjury nullification.

Removal of the jury each time Edward-Lewis:Brown© attempted to tell the whole truth,

so help me God, as so sworn as mandated by the court .

The court's allowing the news media to demonize the defendants, while gagging the

"defendants"' responses.

The court disallowed defendants counsel of their choice, as mandated in the U .S.

Constitution.

Repeatedly refused the termination of his counsels on the demand of EdwardLewis:Brown© and Elaine-Alice :Brown©, in both trial and pre-trial .

Court refused the use of the proper names in addressing us.

Refused lawful abatement due to misnomer .

Judge Singal presided over the trial of Danny Riley, Jason Gerhard, and Cirino Gonzales,

and was thus predisposed against us, bi ased in favor of the U.S. Attorney, and should

have recused himself.

This trial was the result of the unlawful conviction in 2007, wherein the defendants were

tried for violating : (1) a law that does not exist (payment of income tax on the earnings of

one's labor); (2) a law that does not apply to the defendants and is also in contradiction to

the maxims of law that one must be aware that an action is a crime, and that one must

knowingly and willingly commit said crime (structuring) .

Edward-Lewis :Brown© and Elaine-Alice :Brown© maintain our position that we are not

the legal fictions EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN, and are thus held

unlawfully.

Although all pre-trial motions, notices and affidavits have been summarily denied, the

courts have been notified of our position and of our supporting documentation .

These courts are military courts, as self-admitted by said courts by virtue of the military

flag present in the courtrooms, administering the bankruptcy.

We have never consented, we do not consent, we will never consent.

2

Case 1:09-cr-00030-GZS Document 201 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 2 of 3
Edward-Lewis:BrownO, Secured Party Elaine-Alice:Brown©, Secured Party

Creditor, Holdler-in-due-Course with Creditor, Holder-in-due-Course with

unlimited commercial liability unlimited commercial liabilit y

3

Case 1:09-cr-00030-GZS Document 201 Filed 09/09/2009 Page 3 of 3