alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.19 Milacron Inc.
Temporary Enhanced Severance Plan Award Letter You have been selected as a participant in the Milacron Inc. Temporary Enhanced Severance
Plan (the Plan). Your participation in the Plan is subject to the terms and conditions of the
Plan, which are incorporated in and made a part of this Award Letter. Capitalized terms used but
not defined in this Award Letter have the meanings as used or defined in the Plan. 1. Severance Multiple. Subject to all the terms and conditions of the Plan and this
Award Letter, you shall participate in the Plan with a Severance Multiple of twelve (12) months.
Your participation in the Plan shall not become effective unless you have signed and returned this
Award Letter to Brad Baker at 2090 Florence Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45206on or before
November 17, 2003. 2. Release. You acknowledge and agree that you shall not be entitled to any benefits
under the Plan unless you execute a Release, at the time benefits are requested (as provided in
Section 2(b) of the Plan), in favor of the Company and others as set forth in the Release, relating
to all claims or liabilities of any kind relating to your employment with the Company or its
subsidiaries and the termination of such employment. 3. Restrictive Covenants. You acknowledge and agree that, as a condition to your
participation in the Plan and your receipt of any benefits under the Plan, you will be subject to
certain restrictive covenants (including but not limited to covenants not to compete with the
Company, not to solicit or hire employees or clients of the Company, and not to disclose
information relating to the Companys relationships with its customers or other confidential
information), for a period equal to your Severance Multiple as stated above. 4. Confidentiality. You agree to keep confidential the terms of the Plan and your
selection to participate in the Plan, provided that you may disclose such information to your
spouse, personal attorney and personal financial and tax advisors, whom you will advise of the
confidentiality obligation. 5. Plan Language. You acknowledge that you have received a copy of the Plan, that you
have read the Plan and understand your rights and obligations under the Plan, and that you agree to
be bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan. 6. Governing Law. Except to the extent preempted by ERISA, this Award Letter shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio without reference to
principles of conflict of laws. {remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows}




---



##### 



2 MILACRON INC.,by
 AGREED AND ACCEPTED[Name of Participant]
#### Josephine Labella et al., Respondents, v Willis Seafood, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 504]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), entered August 30, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence in a trip and fall case, a plaintiff is required to present proof that the defendant created, or had actual or constructive notice of, the defective condition which allegedly caused the fall *(see Robinson v Lupo,*261 AD2d 525; *Capraro v Staten Is. Univ. Hosp.,*245 AD2d 256). “To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent and it must exist for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit a defendant’s employees to discover and remedy it” *(Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837).

On a motion for summary judgment to dismiss a complaint based upon lack of notice, a defendant is required to make a prima facie showing that it did not have notice of the condition which allegedly caused the plaintiff’s fall *(see Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*248 AD2d 436, 437). Here, the defendant met that burden through the testimony of its secretary/treasurer.

In opposing the motion, the plaintiffs essentially rely on certain photographs of the accident site. However, no evidence was submitted as to when the photographs were taken or as to whether the conditions reflected in the photographs were substantially the same as those which existed on the day of the *383occurrence *(see Saks v Yeshiva of Spring Val.,*257 AD2d 615, 616). Therefore, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]). Prudenti, P.J., O’Brien, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, November 3-7Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,408,572 32,394 76,617 100,419 144,749 277,6Number of loans 18,875 5,885 5,056 2,952 2,096 1,84Weighted average maturity (months)1 25.53 7.84 7.99 10.16 13.96 11.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.02 1.83 1.86 3.86 3.49 4.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.22 3.00 3.03 3.01 3.05 3.0

Weighted average interest rate4 4.56 5.42 5.35 5.19 4.97 4. Standard error5 .19 .16 .13 .16 .13 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 5.65 6.25 6.40 6.18 6.13 5. 25th percentile 3.56 4.58 4.31 4.07 4.07 3.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.68 5.61 5.69 5.33 5.14 4. Other livestock 4.36 5.27 5.35 5.37 4.42 3.4 Other current operating expenses7 4.54 5.48 5.47 5.22 5.02 4.

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.77 6.90 5.77 6.61 6.03 5.4 Farm real estate 5.83 5.82 5.47 6.16 6.62 6. Other8 3.98 4.55 4.47 4.46 4.47 4.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 84.59 87.04 84.15 82.63 80.39 77.7 Under commitment 79.81 92.47 88.96 83.98 80.41 83. Callable 15.80 26.58 29.12 27.18 23.25 25.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.64 4.42 5.02 9.89 10.70 7.7 Other livestock 10.31 4.84 7.27 6.83 9.05 8.7 Other current operating expenses7 40.03 75.32 70.85 60.95 53.18 46. Farm machinery and equipment 2.02 2.96 2.40 4.18 3.91 3.0 Farm real estate 11.88 1.79 1.26 1.78 3.53 7. Other8 27.12 10.66 13.20 16.37 19.63 26.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 11.46 3.89 4.09 5.91 12.73 10. Other 85.83 91.37 90.62 89.52 85.12 85. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
#### James Douglas McArthur YEAGER, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 45226.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

July 19, 1972.

Dan J. Anderson, Richardson, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., James B. Scott, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Jim D. Vollers, State’s Atty., and Robert A. Huttash, Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, five hundred (500) years.

Appellant’s sole ground of error is that his punishment is cruel and unusual within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Article 1, Sec. 13, of the Constitution of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.St. Specifically, he contends that Art. 1257, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., provides for cruel and unusual punishment since it sets no limit on the number of years a jury may assess and conceivably permit sentences of “one million” or more years. Alternatively, he suggests that the statute actually does not permit a sentence of 500 years. He claims that the wording of Article 1257, V.A.P.C., providing the punishment for murder as “ . . . confinement in the penitentiary for life or for any term of years not less than two (2)” means that the jury may only assess life or a term of years less than a reasonable life expectancy but more than two (2).

Recently, in Sills v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 119, 120, we dealt with a similar contention and concluded, as we do here, that a very long sentence:

> “. . . . does not change the rule that a person can be considered for parole when he has received credit for 20 years *638or one-third of his sentence, whichever is the less. Art. 42.12, Sec. 15, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. Since such [long] sentences serve no purpose, the Legislature should at least set a maximum as well as a minimum for every crime. The entire sentencing structure of the State of Texas should be inquired into by the Legislature, which is the proper body, and not this Court, to make those corrections.”

See also Miller v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 150.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CertificatePursuant to

18U.S.C. Section 1350

asAdopted Pursuant to

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, Ken Huey, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  October 29, 2004 | /s/  Ken Huey, Jr.                              |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Ken Huey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer,         |
| * *                | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
AutoCoded Document





AMENDMENT
TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE SALARY
CONTINUATION
AGREEMENT
FOR
TED T. AWERKAMP
Mercantile
Trust & Savings Bank
Quincy,
Illinois



     THIS
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEE SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT dated December 8,
1994 by and between Mercantile Trust & Savings Bank, an Illinois corporation
(the “Company”) and Ted T. Awerkamp (the “Participant”) is
made effective April 26, 2004.



     WHEREAS,
the Company and the Participant entered into an Executive Employee Salary
Continuation Agreement dated December 8, 1994 (the “Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS,
the Company and the Participant have determined that there were provisions in
the Agreement providing for a benefit to be payable upon Participant’s
Discharge for Cause; and



     WHEREAS,
the Company and the Participant wish to amend the Agreement to specify their
intent that no benefit would be payable upon the Participant’s Discharge
for Cause and upon a Discharge for Cause the Participant would forfeit all
rights in and to any benefits under the Agreement.



     NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company and the Participant, in consideration of the premises,
hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



     1.
Paragraph 3.4 a) is hereby deleted and inserted in lieu thereof is the following:



	 	“3.4 	Other
Terminations of Employment.







	 	a)	Voluntary
Termination of Employment Prior to the Early Retirement Date. Upon the  Participant’s
voluntary Termination of Employment prior to reaching the Early  Retirement Date, for
reasons other than death, the Company shall pay the “Immediate  Lump Sum Benefit”,
if any, for the Participant’s Age at the time of voluntary  Termination of
Employment prior to the Early Retirement Date pursuant to Exhibit A  attached to this
Agreement, and the Participant shall have no further right to receive any  additional
benefit hereunder.”







     2.
The following new section 3.4 d) is hereby added to the Agreement to read as follows:



1











	 	“d)	Involuntary
Termination of Employment Upon the Participant’s Discharge for Cause  At Any
Time. Upon the Participant’s Discharge for Cause at any time, the  Participant
shall forfeit all rights, vested and unvested, that the Participant has in and  to
benefits under the Agreement. The Participant agrees that no benefits shall be payable
pursuant to the Agreement if the employment of the Participant is involuntarily
terminated  on account of a Discharge for Cause at any time. On Discharge for Cause, the
Company shall  have no obligation to pay any benefit to the Participant under the terms
of the Agreement.







     3.
Except as set forth in this  Amendment,  the Agreement  shall remain  unaltered and in
full force  and effect according to its terms and conditions.



     IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Executive Employee Salary Continuation
Agreement has been executed by the Company and the Participant as of the date
first above written.



	 	Mercantile
Trust & Savings Bank
Quincy, Illinois
 
By /s/ Dan S. Dugan                    

      Its
President
 
/s/ Ted T. Awerkamp                   
      Ted T.
Awerkamp







2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Scott Kimball

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00154-JL

Bonk Air Transport, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

August 1, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:08-cv-00154-JL Document 7 Filed 07/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 21, 2008

cc: David P. Slawsky, Esq.

Karyn P. Forbes, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00154-JL Document 7 Filed 07/21/08 Page 2 of 2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 904 

Commending the Northport American Legion Post 694 located in Northport, 

New York, for raising funds for the Marine and Army combat units 

fighting in the Middle East, enabling them to purchase needed equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. ISRAEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Northport American Legion Post 694 located in Northport, New York, for raising funds for 

the Marine and Army combat units fighting in the Middle East, enabling them to purchase needed equipment. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Northport American Legion 

3 Post 694 located in Northport, New York, for rais4 ing more than $75,000 for the Marine and Army 

5 combat units fighting in the Middle East, enabling 

6 them to purchase welding equipment, ballistic com7 bat goggles, thigh-rig drop pouches, special rifle 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 904 IH 

1 slings, combat gloves, and other needed equipment; 

2 and 

3 (2) commends other American Legion Posts na4 tionwide that have raised funds for similar purposes. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... 73 9 7 23 34 .146 .018 .015 .045 .064

2007...... n.a. 8 13 23 n.a. n.a. .014 .025 .042 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3723

___________

Gary Barfield, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

Dr. Duong Ly, East Arkansas * District Court for the Eastern

Regional Unit, ADC; Bernard * District of Arkansas.

Williams, Infirmary Manager, East *

Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Max * [UNPUBLISHED]

Mobley, Deputy Director of Health *

Services, Arkansas Department of *

Correction, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 6, 2002

Filed: March 8, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Gary Barfield challenges the district court's dismissal of Barfield's 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 lawsuit after holding a pretrial evidentiary hearing. After careful

consideration of all the evidence, the district court concluded there was no evidence

from which a jury could find the correctional officials acted with deliberate
-2-

indifference to Barfield's serious medical needs. Based on our de novo review, see

Randle v. Parker, 48 F.3d 301, 303 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review), we agree

with the district court and thus affirm the order of dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of Quaniqua W., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 83]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about November 30, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, and placed her with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. In a subway station, after appellant repeatedly and noisily banged on a pay phone, causing a disturbance, appellant refused to comply with the officers’ directives to leave the station, screamed, cursed, flailed her arms, and struggled with the officers. The officers *381were attempting to maintain order in the station, which was an official police function, and appellant intentionally obstructed that function through “physical force or interference” *(see*Penal Law § 195.05; *Matter of Davan L.,*91 NY2d 88 [1997]; *Matter of Shannon B.,*70 NY2d 458 [1987]; *Matter of Darnell C.,*305 AD2d 405 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Case 1:11-cv-02285-NYW Document 147 Filed 01/29/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Renewal of Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 RENEWAL OF 
  
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
  
 GREGORY A. DUNCAN AND 
  
 SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC. 
  
 As of February 28, 2004, the employment of Gregory A. Duncan is hereby deemed to be renewed for three (3) years under the terms and conditions per the Employment Agreement dated March 12, 2001 (but effective as
of February 28, 2001), as amended. 
  
 The base salary as per
Section 4.1 will be $316,020.00 per year. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.

	 Attest:
	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	 /s/ Lisa M. Cavage

	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.


	 Secretary and Counsel
	 	 	 	 Edward Balderston, Jr.

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 EVP & Chief Administrative Officer

				
	 [SEAL]
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2007: Q3... 15 50 35 16 72 12 9 86 5 5 58 37 13 46 

 Q4... 16 42 41 27 67 6 9 80 11 5 62 33 18 32 2008: Q1... 20 46 34 41 55 4 17 77 6 8 59 33 19 35  Q2... 26 49 25 45 52 3 22 72 6 10 56 34 26 36  Q3... 18 37 45 31 64 4 19 76 5 13 67 20 8 35  Q4... 16 41 43 28 72 1 13 77 10 19 67 14 7 30 2009: Q1... 15 54 32 34 63 3 21 69 10 21 68 11 9 41  Q2... 30 49 21 42 56 2 32 57 11 26 62 12 21 47  Q3... 24 54 22 38 58 5 33 61 6 21 59 19 17 43 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2007: Q3... 10 72 18 15 75 10 11 80 3 8 75 18 7 69 

 Q4... 11 63 26 16 71 13 7 90 3 8 76 16 8 64 2008: Q1... 22 57 21 29 65 6 11 86 4 17 76 7 19 55  Q2... 21 56 23 40 53 8 13 85 2 8 78 14 15 51  Q3... 15 71 15 31 65 4 11 89 0 13 74 13 11 58  Q4... 38 52 10 47 48 5 19 69 6 23 71 6 22 52 2009: Q1... 30 59 11 41 56 3 17 74 4 15 77 8 16 65  Q2... 33 58 9 33 64 3 22 67 6 10 87 3 22 61  Q3... 36 56 8 38 60 2 26 67 2 21 70 4 27 61 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2007: Q3... 36 64 0 18 82 0 20 80 0 8 58 33 21 71 

 Q4... 39 56 6 33 67 0 31 69 0 24 76 0 17 61 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.  Q2... 25 56 19 20 73 7 21 71 7 19 56 25 13 75  Q3... 60 33 7 36 64 0 46 54 0 29 64 7 40 47  Q4... 56 38 6 43 57 0 50 50 0 36 50 14 50 38 2009: Q1... 41 53 6 33 67 0 47 53 0 35 59 6 35 55  Q2... 67 33 0 53 40 7 53 40 7 35 59 6 44 44  Q3... 75 13 13 57 36 7 50 36 14 38 44 19 31 44  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, May 3-7, 2010Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,532,822 149,506 153,298 539,342 376,304 168,395 2,8Number of loans 28,299 1,971 3,556 12,436 5,146 1,264 Weighted average maturity (months)1 23.76 49.09 22.06 20.00 23.66 14.47 4.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.17 13.57 13.94 6.25 3.02 9.75 1.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.19 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 5.33 5.29 6.25 5.20 4.96 5.23 2. Standard error5 .17 .44 .25 .19 .37 .52 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.52 6.51 7.26 6.50 6.40 7.00 3. 25th percentile 4.08 4.33 5.29 4.26 3.59 3.43 1. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.33 6.05 5.51 5.28 4.99 4.49 5. Other livestock 7.56 7.19 5.53 5.17 3.72 n.a. 6. Other current operating expenses7 5.74 6.06 5.58 5.12 4.46 3.55 6.

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.55 7.24 5.83 4.24 7.22 n.a. 6. Farm real estate 5.88 5.94 6.11 6.28 6.96 n.a. 5. Other8 3.00 7.23 3.44 4.84 4.35 2.73 5.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 71.12 66.46 44.58 73.77 86.84 73.30 50. Under commitment 72.58 69.63 60.68 76.68 86.22 83.99 58. Callable 22.20 7.21 21.77 37.50 10.38 20.73 n Subject to prepayment penalty 16.62 21.24 4.21 16.24 15.45 41.85 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.42 2.46 17.23 4.64 4.16 1.36 n Other livestock 5.43 3.23 1.81 4.13 6.84 13.94 n Other current operating expenses7 46.93 46.97 56.35 59.61 31.75 28.59 28. Farm machinery and equipment 6.90 10.65 3.27 6.19 5.03 13.68 n Farm real estate 7.11 13.94 1.60 6.07 2.02 20.59 n Other8 27.21 22.76 19.74 19.36 50.21 21.84 71.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.71 17.99 11.83 10.73 10.90 23.63 10. Other 83.27 79.26 84.44 86.65 88.30 76.36 69. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.