alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKENS, Education Department,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the pro se Plaintiff’s Motion to Request Restricted

Access to Video Footage Lefted [sic] (Docket No. 213), in which plaintiff asks the court

to “release the restriction placed on” certain prison video footage that has been subject

to a Protective Order (Docket No. 69) and “allow the jury access to review these

records,” is granted as follows. As represented by defense counsel, the Bureau of

Prisons will coordinate with the court to enable the videos to be shown at trial if

necessary. 

Date: April 29, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 221 Filed 04/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 January 4, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

Nos. 03-1114 & 04-1095 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee ,

v. BONNIE LAGIGLIO, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division No. 01 CR 348 John F. Grady, Judge. O R D E R Bonnie LaGiglio was sentenced for a tax offense. On appeal she argued that the district court erred by sentencing her under the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines, see United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We ordered a limited remand, United States v. Paladino , 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2005), and the district court said that it would have imposed the same sentence had it known that the guidelines were advisory. That sentence was within a properly calculated guideline range and presumptively reasonable, see United States v. Mykytiuk , 415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Because LaGiglio has not rebutted that presumption, the judgment is AFFIRMED. UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Leon B. Artus, et al.

v. Case No. 09-cv-87-PB

Town of Atkinson, et al.

Plaintiffs’ motion to amend (Doc. No. 18) is granted in part

and denied in part. The motion is granted except to the extent

that the amended complaint seeks to assert claims on behalf of

Mark Acciard. Acciard’s claims do not arise from the same

transactions or occurrences as the other claims asserted in the

complaint. Thus, joinder is not warranted under Fed. R. Civ. P.

20. Plaintiffs have failed to make a persuasive case that

Acciard is a necessary party that must be joined under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 19. Accordingly, there is no basis for joining his

claims with the claims brought by the other plaintiffs. 

SO ORDERED.

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

October 14, 2009

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:09-cv-00087-PB Document 43 Filed 10/14/09 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Case 1:09-cv-00087-PB Document 43 Filed 10/14/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                               [KPMG letterhead]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20259
USA

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Campbell Resources Inc. (the "Corporation") for the year ended December 31, 2000
of our report dated April 3, 2001 which appears under Item 14 of the
aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-28296 and 333-93063)
pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan and Directors' Stock
Option Plan.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
April 12, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CHIEF JUDGE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: February 11, 2013

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

Parties: Counsel:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Linda Kaufman

Martha Paluch

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS, William Taylor

Darlene Bagley

Defendant.

ARRAIGNMENT AND CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING

10:04 a.m. Court in session.

Defendant present on bond.

Defendant is arraigned on Count 1 of the Information. Defendant pleads guilty to Count 1 of

the Information. The Government intends to dismiss the Counts of the Indictment against

this defendant.

Defendant sworn.

The Court advises the defendant of his right to be indicted by the grand jury. The defendant

waives his right to indictment. 

Defendant advised regarding:

1) The Plea Agreement;

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 214 filed 02/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Courtroom Minutes

Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

2) The maximum and minimum penalties, terms and conditions of supervised

release, restitution, probation and/or forfeiture;

3) The objectives and factors in 18 U.S.C. §3553(a).

The Court explains defendant’s right to a trial by jury and other constitutional rights and

confirms that the defendant desires to waive such rights. 

The Government orally moves to dismiss the Counts of the Indictment against this defendant (1-

2; 5-6; 12-13; 15). Defendant has no objection.

Oral findings are made of record. 

ORDER: The Government’ s oral Motion to Dismiss the Counts of the Indictment against

this defendant is GRANTED but the effect of the Order is stayed until time of

Sentencing.

ORDER: Plea Agreement and Statement by Defendant in Advance of Plea of Guilty (and

any translations thereof) are received.

ORDER: Defendant’s plea is accepted and defendant is adjudged guilty as charged in

Count 1 of the Information. 

ORDER: Probation department shall conduct a presentence investigation and submit a

presentence report as required by Fed.R.Cr.P.32. Defendant shall, with the

assistance of counsel, immediately after this hearing or as soon as is practicable

make arrangements to participate in the presentence investigation and shall

cooperate fully with the probation department.

ORDER: Sentencing hearing is set on May 6, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom A901, 901

19th Street, Denver, CO. 

ORDER: Pending Motions (Doc# 148, 160) are DENIED as moot.

ORDER: Bond is continued.

11:01 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 57 Minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 214 filed 02/11/13 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**September 2009**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: September 15, 2009**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01756-DME-MJW

MARCUS L. FREEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WOOLSTON, Vocational Instructor, and

LIKENS, Education Department,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Settlement

Conference (Docket No. 235) is granted. A Settlement Conference shall be held before

Magistrate Judge Watanabe on August 20, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A-502, Fifth

Floor, Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. 

Plaintiff shall participate by telephone. His case manager or other BOP staff shall place

the call to (303) 844-2403. Any BOP officials who need to be consulted by defense

counsel during this conference shall be available by telephone and shall provide

defense counsel with the telephone number where they can be reached during this

conference. It is further

ORDERED that in order that productive settlement discussions can be held,

Confidential Settlement Statements shall be submitted to the court on or before 

August 13, 2013. Such Statements shall contain an overview of the case from the

presenter's point of view, shall summarize the evidence which supports that side's

claims, shall present a demand or offer, and shall contain any confidential comments

which counsel or the pro se party wishes to make, as well as any comments with regard

to perceived weaknesses in the case and any comments which would be helpful to the

Magistrate Judge in assisting the parties to negotiate a settlement. The pro se plaintiff

shall submit his Confidential Settlement to the Clerk’s Office, marked “Personal and

Confidential.” Defense counsel shall submit the Confidential Settlement Statement to

Watanabe_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov with “confidential settlement statement - short

case title and case number” (e.g., confidential settlement statement - Jones v. Smith, 05-

CV-00000-XXX-MJW) in the subject line.

Date: June 18, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-01756-DME-MJW Document 237 Filed 06/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
September 22, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RUSSELL SINGLETON LEONARD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00560

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEX AS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1566

To urge the President to initiate consultations with the Governments of

Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand to determine the feasibility and

desirability of negotiations to create a free trade area between the United

States and those countries.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 2001

Mr. LEACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To urge the President to initiate consultations with the Governments of Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand to

determine the feasibility and desirability of negotiations

to create a free trade area between the United States

and those countries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1566 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONSULTATIONS REGARDING A UNITED

2 STATES, SINGAPORE, AUSTRALIA, AND NEW

3 ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA.

4 The President is urged to initiate consultations with

5 the Governments of Singapore, Australia, and New Zea6 land to determine the feasibility and desirability of nego7 tiations with such Governments for the purpose of enter8 ing into a reciprocal and mutually advantageous trade

9 agreement creating a free trade area between the United

10 States and those 3 countries.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO TORRES SALINAS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-70211 

Agency No. A089-745-746 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 4, 2020**

Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Sergio Torres Salinas (“Petitioner”) is a native and citizen of Mexico. He 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) 

dismissing his appeal from the decision of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the 

District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

FILED

NOV 2 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-70211 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and related relief under the 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and for cancellation of removal. Because 

the petition for review was filed more than thirty (30) days after the BIA’s 

decision, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Under Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a filing is not 

timely unless the papers are filed with the clerk within the time allowed, which is 

thirty days after the date of the final order according to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). We 

strictly construe this rule. See, e.g., Magtanong v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1190, 1191 

(9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). The court’s electronic filing system reflects that the 

attempts made by Petitioner’s counsel to electronically file this petition for review 

on January 18, 2014, and January 21, 2014, were unsuccessful as counsel failed to 

complete the electronic filing process. As noted by the Sheviakov court, “a petition 

for review is deemed filed not when mailed, but only when the clerk ‘receives’ it.” 

Sheviakov v. I.N.S., 237 F.3d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 2001). Here, we did not receive 

the petition until January 22, 2014, and thus, we do not have jurisdiction over the 

petition for review.

PETITION DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

1

1 After this case was submitted, Petitioner filed a motion to refer the case to 

mediation or stay proceedings. (ECF No. 81.) The motion does not make a 

sufficient showing to stay proceedings. Therefore, the request for a stay is 

DENIED and the request to refer the case to mediation is deemed MOOT.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Tracy S. Clifford, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Golf Trust of America, Inc;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| November 7, 2007 |     | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                         |   |
|------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|             |     | Tracy S. Clifford                             |
|             | * * | *Principal Accounting Officer  and Secretary* |

 

----
Case 1:11-cv-02222-LTB Document 6 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02222-LTB Document 6 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02222-LTB Document 6 Filed 10/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00347-PAB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

1. ALFREDO MIRALDA-CABRERRA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATES AND DEADLINES

_____________________________________________________________________

This matter has been scheduled for a three-day jury trial on the docket of Judge

Philip A. Brimmer in the U.S. District Courthouse, Courtroom A701, 7th Floor, 901 19th

Street, Denver, Colorado, to commence on November 7, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. It is

ORDERED that all pretrial motions shall be filed by October 7, 2011 and

responses to these motions shall be filed by October 14, 2011. It is further

ORDERED that expert witness disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 shall

be made no later than seven days before the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any

challenges to such experts shall be made by the pretrial motion filing deadline. It is

further

ORDERED that disclosures regarding rebuttal expert witnesses shall be made

one week after the deadline for filing pretrial motions and any challenges to such

experts shall be made no later than two weeks after the pretrial motions deadline. It is

further
2

ORDERED that a Trial Preparation Conference is set for November 3, 2011 at

8:00 a.m. in Courtroom A701. Lead counsel who will try the case shall attend in

person. 

The parties shall be prepared to address the following issues at the Trial

Preparation Conference:

1) jury selection;

2) sequestration of witnesses;

3) timing of presentation of witnesses and evidence;

4) anticipated evidentiary issues;

5) any stipulations as to fact or law; and

6) any other issue affecting the duration or course of the trial. 

DATED September 13, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 14

                              THE DRESS BARN, INC.

                                 CODE OF ETHICS
                                       FOR
                            SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS


Introduction.

This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial  Officers has been adopted by The Dress
Barn,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  to promote  honest and  ethical  conduct,  proper
disclosure of financial  information  in the  Company's  periodic  reports,  and
compliance with applicable laws,  rules, and regulations by the Company's senior
officers who have financial responsibilities.

Applicability.

As used in this Code,  the term Senior  Financial  Officer  means the  Company's
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller.

Principles and Practices.

In performing his or her duties, each of the Senior Financial Officers must:

(1)  maintain high standards of honest and ethical  conduct and avoid any actual
     or apparent conflict of interest;

(2)  report to the Audit  Committee  of the Board of  Directors  any conflict of
     interest that may arise and any material  transaction or relationship  that
     reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict;

(3)  provide,  or  cause to be  provided,  full,  fair,  accurate,  timely,  and
     understandable  disclosure in reports and documents  that the Company files
     with or submits to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and in other
     public communications;

(4)  comply  and take all  reasonable  actions  to cause  others to comply  with
     applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations; and

(5)  promptly report violations of this Code to the Audit Committee.

Waiver.

Any  request for a waiver of any  provision  of this Code must be in writing and
addressed  to the Audit  Committee.  Any  waiver of this Code will be  disclosed
promptly on Form 8-K or any other means  approved by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Compliance and Accountability.

The Audit  Committee  will assess  compliance  with this Code,  report  material
violations  to the Board of Directors,  and  recommend to the Board  appropriate
action.