alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                       NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY, INC.
                    Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                           ----------------------------
                                                                1997         1996
                                                              -------      -------
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>    
Average number of common shares outstanding                     6,898

Proforma shares outstanding                                        --        4,230

Common equivalent shares outstanding:                              --           --
                                                              -------      -------
     Stock options

Total common and common equivalent shares outstanding           6,898        4,230
                                                              =======      =======

Net income (loss) before income taxes from Reorganization
     of partnership                                           $  (730)     $   501
                                                              =======      =======

Net income (loss) as adjusted                                 $(6,173)
                                                              =======

Loss per share                                                $ (0.11)
                                                              =======

Loss per share as adjusted                                    $ (0.89)
                                                              =======

Proforma earnings per share                                                $  0.12
                                                                           =======
</TABLE>




                                       23
Exhibit 99.1

Certificate
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman R. Corzine, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                 |  | October 30, 2002
|---------------- |  | ----------------
|October 30, 2002 |  |                 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                     EXHIBIT 15








TXU Corp.:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial information of TXU Corp. and subsidiaries (TXU
Corp.) as of September 30, 2004 and for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated November 4,
2004 (November 8, 2004 as to Note 13); which includes an explanatory paragraph
related to the restatement described in Note 13; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in TXU Corp.'s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-37652, 333-64504,
333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01, 333-71004-02, 333-84418,
333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-103922,
and 333-115159 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 333-32833,
333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-62014, 333-86640, 333-92260 and 333-105133 on Form
S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 8, 2004
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-142138, 33-60781, 333-96097, and 333-82682) of UniFirst Corporation of our reports dated November 11, 2008 with respect to the Consolidated Financial Statements and schedule of UniFirst Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of UniFirst Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 30, 2008.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

 

November 11, 2008
Exhibit 10.10


March 31, 2004

Mr. David A. Barclay
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Republic Services, Inc.
110 SE 6th Street - 28th Floor
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Regarding:  Promissory Note Dated May 6, 2003 to Republic Services of Georgia,
            Limited Partnership ("RSLP"), a Delaware limited partnership (as
            successor to United Waste Service, Inc.)

Dear David:

Pursuant to a discussion between Bob Davis and Tod Holmes and at the request of
Mr. Holmes, we seek to confirm your agreement that RSLP hereby agrees to waive
any and all defaults which may now exist as a result of GreenMan's failure to
timely make such payments due under the above referenced promissory note prior
to June 30, 2004.

David, if you are in agreement with the above, please acknowledge your agreement
below and forward this letter back to my attention.

Sincerely,


/s/ Charles E. Coppa                   /s/ David A.Barclay
--------------------                   -------------------
Charles E. Coppa                       Agreed,
Chief Financial Officer                Mr. David A. Barclay
                                       Senior Vice President and General Counsel
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 3.02 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pizza Inn, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 21, 2007
    By:
    /s/  J. Kevin BlandPrincipal Financial Officer 71
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER

Courtroom Deputy: Patricia Glover Date: August 23, 2012

Court Reporter: Terri Lindblom

Criminal Action No. 11-cr-00355-MSK

Parties: Counsel Appearing:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAUNITA WEINGART,

JOHN PHILLIP GALLEGOS,

ALOIS CRAIG WEINGART,

Defendant.

Linda Kaufman

Martha Paluck

Martin Stuart

William Taylor

Paula Ray

COURTROOM MINUTES

HEARING: Motions

10:59 a.m. Court in session.

Defendants Weingart are present; defendant Gallegos is present by telephone.

The Court addresses the motions to continue the trial (Doc. #123, 124, 125, 127).

Statements by all counsel as to time requested for the continuance.

The Court made specific oral findings justifying a continuance of the trial, which findings are

incorporated herein.

ORDER: The ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The trial currently set

on September 17, 2012 and the final pretrial conference set on September 13,

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 132 filed 08/23/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
Courtroom Minutes

Judge Marcia S. Krieger

Page 2

2012 at 4:00 p.m. are VACATED and reset the trial to begin March 18, 2013

at 1:30 p.m.; final pretrial conference is set on March 14, 2013 at 4:00 p.m., all

in Courtroom A901, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO. The trial is set for 5 weeks, with

dark days at this juncture being on each Friday. The parties will be advised if the

dark day changes, due to press of Court business during the trial. All subsequent

days of trial will begin at 8:30 a.m., unless counsel are notified otherwise. Any

subpoenas issued will be continued to the new trial date. The current deadlines

for disclosure of experts will remain in effect. All information, including any

additional witnesses will be disclosed by September 17, 2012. No later

amendments increasing the number of witness or exhibits absent leave of Court.

This deadline is binding only on the Government, with the exceptions set forth by

the Court. Motions at Doc. #123, 124, 125 and 127 are GRANTED.

ORDER: Bond is continued.

11:21 a.m. Court in recess.

Total Time: 22 minutes.

Hearing concluded.

Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 132 filed 08/23/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2015

a0930

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2015

150753

In re CHARLES PORTUS

____________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Appellee,

v SC: 150753

COA: 309197

Oakland Probate Court:

 1976-017337-MI 

CHARLES PORTUS,

Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. “[F]or obvious 

reasons founded in fairness and justice, time provisions are often found to be directory 

where a mandatory construction might do great injury to persons not at fault, as in a case 

where slight delay on the part of a public officer might prejudice private rights or the 

public interest.” In re Bail Bond Forfeiture (People v Gaston), 496 Mich 320, 329 

(2014). In light of the appellant’s own admissions that he fantasizes about kidnapping 

children, that his fantasies are both sexual and violent, and that he poses a danger to the 

public, this is such a case.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC and

WILLIAM THIEDE,

Defendant.

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Pursuant to the hearing on December 14, 2005, it is

ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be held on January 20, 2006, at

2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States

Courthouse, 18th and Stout Streets, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to

comply with the Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order which may be found

at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges frame.htm and use the format provided with

those instructions. Proposed orders are to be double-spaced. In addition, the

proposed Scheduling Order in WordPerfect format shall be submitted by e-mail to

Matsch_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov

Dated: December 16, 2005

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

___________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 128 Filed 12/16/05 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, W. Bradley Blair, II, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golf Trust of America, Inc;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| May 15, 2006 | /s/ W. BRADLEY BLAIR, II  |   |
|--------------|---------------------------|--------|
|         | W. Bradley Blair, II      |
|         | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
No. 72-1102.

#### International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 57 *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-17 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-17 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-17 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 3 of 4
Case No. 1:11-cr-00355-MSK Document 161-17 filed 10/17/12 USDC Colorado pg 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01731-CMA-MJW

AMANDA SULLIVAN, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of

Kiera Sullivan, a minor, deceased, and

CHRISTOPHER SULLIVAN, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate

of Kiera Sullivan, a minor, deceased, 

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DELTA ENTERPRISE, CORP.,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion to Amend the Scheduling

Order, DN 18, filed with the Court on February 28, 2012, is GRANTED and the

Scheduling Order entered on November 28, 2011, is amended as follows:

a. Plaintiffs’ disclosure of affirmative experts: May 30, 2012;

b. Defendant’s disclosure of expert witnesses: June 30, 2012;

c. Plaintiffs’ disclosure of rebuttal experts: July 15, 2012; and,

d. Discovery cut-off deadline: July 30, 2012

 Date: March 26, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01731-CMA-MJW Document 26 Filed 03/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50670

Summary Calendar

ELISEO GARCIA,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

C.T. RANCHES,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CV-24

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Eliseo Garcia, federal prisoner federal prisoner# 57842-180, has moved for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the denial of his Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motions for relief for judgment and from the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for lack of

jurisdiction. The district court denied Garcia IFP status on appeal and certified

that the appeal was not taken in good faith under § 1915(a)(3).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50670 Document: 00511509166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/15/2011
No. 10-50670

By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Garcia is challenging the district

court’s certification that the appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Garcia’s July 12, 2010, notice of

appeal from the district court’s June 30, 2009, dismissal of his suit for lack of

jurisdiction, is untimely. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Further, Garcia has not

adequately briefed and has thus abandoned any challenge to the district court’s

denial of IFP as to his Rule 60(b) motions. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County

Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Garcia has not demonstrated that he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on

appeal. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly,

Garcia’s motion to proceed IFP is denied. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24.

Because his appeal is frivolous, see Howard, 707 F.2d at 219-20, the appeal is

dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal of Garcia’s claims against the defendants in

Garcia v. Henderson, No. A-09-CA-377, as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e) and our dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for

purposes of § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.

1996). Garcia is warned that, if he accumulates three strikes pursuant to §

1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he “is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury.” § 1915(g).

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.

2

Case: 10-50670 Document: 00511509166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/15/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1811 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1811

To provide permanent funding for the payment in lieu of taxes program, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2001

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide permanent funding for the payment in lieu of taxes program, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PILT and Refuge Revenue Sharing 
Permanent Funding Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT FUNDING FOR PILT AND REFUGE REVENUE SHARING.

    (a) Payments in Lieu of Taxes.--Section 6906 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 6901. Authorization of appropriations
    ``There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to the Secretary of the Interior to carry out this chapter. 
Beginning in fiscal year 2002 and each fiscal year thereafter, amounts 
authorized under this chapter shall be made available to the Secretary 
of the Interior, out of any other funds in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated and without further appropriation, for obligation or 
expenditure in accordance with this chapter.''.
    (b) Refuge Revenue Sharing.--Section 401(d) of the Act of June 15, 
1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s(d)), relating to refuge revenue sharing, is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``Beginning in fiscal year 
2002 and each fiscal year thereafter, such amount shall be made 
available to the Secretary, out of any other funds in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated and without further appropriation, for 
obligation or expenditure in accordance with this section.''.
                                 <all>
```