alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-492-JL

William Albrecht

O R D E R

Kevin Hall is hereby granted in forma pauperis status.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 21, 2009

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00492-JL Document 15 Filed 04/21/09 Page 1 of 1
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 21, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify 
     the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2001

Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Matsui, and Mr. Sessions) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to more accurately codify 
     the depreciable life of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Semiconductor Equipment Investment 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. 3-YEAR DEPRECIABLE LIFE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 
              EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 168(e)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of property) 
is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (ii), by striking 
the period at the end of clause (iii) and inserting ``, and'', and by 
adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(iv) any semiconductor manufacturing equipment.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(e)(3) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking clause (ii),
                    (B) by redesignating clauses (iii) through (vi) as 
                clauses (ii) through (v), respectively, and
                    (C) by striking ``clause (vi)(I)'' in the last 
                sentence and inserting ``clause (v)(I)''.
            (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 168(g)(3) of such Code is 
        amended by striking the items relating to subparagraph (B)(ii) 
        and subparagraph (B)(iii) and inserting the following:

                        ``(A)(iv)..............................      3 
                        ``(B)(ii)..............................  9.5''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to equipment placed in service after December 31, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending June 2, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodMEDWAY CO-OPERATIVE BANK                                                                                                MemberApplication by Medway Co-operative Bank, Medway, MA, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act and section 208.3 of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending February 16, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANKTENNESSEE                                                                                                           * BranchBank Tennessee, Collierville, Tennessee requests to establish a branch at 936 Upper Ferry Road, Carthage, Tennessee.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableBANKTENNESSEE                                                                                                           * BranchBank Tennessee, Collierville Tennessee requests to establish a branch at 936 Upper Ferry Road, Carthage Tennessee.Newspaper: 03/01/2019Federal Register: Not applicableMONTICELLO BANKING COMPANY                                                                                              * BranchMonticello Banking Company, Monticello, Kentucky, to establish a branch facility to be located at 104 Springdale Drive, Nicholasville, Kentucky.Newspaper: 02/22/2019Federal Register: Not applicableMONTICELLO BANKING COMPANY                                                                                              * BranchMonticello Banking Company, Monticello, Kentucky, to establish a branch facility to be located at 997 Governors Lane, Suite 125, Lexington, Kentucky.Newspaper: 02/22/2019Federal Register: Not applicableSOUTHERN BANCORP BANK                                                                                                   * BranchSouthern Bancorp Bank, Arkadelphia, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 118 Elm Street, Glenwood, Arkansas.Newspaper: 02/22/2019Federal Register: Not applicableSOUTHERN BANCORP BANK                                                                                                   * BranchSouthern Bancorp Bank requests to establish a full service branch at 1017 Highway 270 East, Mount Ida, Arkansas.Newspaper: 03/01/2019Federal Register: Not applicableSTIFEL FINANCIAL CORP.                                                                                                  * 3A3Stifel Financial Corp., St. Louis, Missouri, to convert Stifel Trust Company, National Association, St. Louis, Missouri, from a non-depository trust company to a depository trust company that qualifies as a limited purpose bank.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 03/07/2019
EXHIBIT 10.3
                                  ------------

                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT  AGREEMENT   (this  "Amendment")   dated
October 20, 1998 is by and between BARTON  INCORPORATED,  a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), and ALEXANDER L. BERK (the "Employee").

     WHEREAS,  the Company and Employee  are parties to that certain  Employment
Agreement  dated  September 1, 1990 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment
Agreement dated November 11, 1996, the "Agreement"), and desire to further amend
the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for  good  and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt  and
sufficiency  of which are  hereby  acknowledged,  the  parties  hereto  agree as
follows:

     1.  Position and Duties.  Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and the following inserted therefor:

     "Employee shall serve as the President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company  and as a member  of the  boards of  directors  of the  Company  and its
principal  subsidiaries,  and as a member of the Company's Management Committee.
The Employee  shall report and be  responsible  directly to the Chief  Executive
Officer  of  Canandaigua  Brands,  Inc.  ("CBI"),  with such  powers  and duties
consistent  with his offices as may from time to time be  authorized or directed
by CBI's Chief Executive  Officer.  Employee shall devote his full-time services
to the  employment  provided  for herein.  All  services  and duties of Employee
rendered hereunder shall be performed faithfully, diligently and competently and
to the highest standards of loyalty."

     2. No Further Modifications.  Except as specifically  set forth herein, the
Agreement shall remain in full force and unaffected hereby.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the  parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first above written.

COMPANY:                                      EMPLOYEE:

BARTON INCORPORATED                           /s/ A. Berk
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Alexander L. Berk
/s/ Richard Sands
-------------------------------
Richard Sands
Vice President
**Exhibit 15.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-203977) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-81524,333-100472,333-107160,333-122785,333-125978,333-135116,333-151490,333-161683,333-161684,333-167643 and333-196453) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated March 27, 2018 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AB 

PricewaterhouseCoopers AB 

Stockholm, Sweden 

March 27, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 184 (Monday, September 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22236]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Tuesday, September 30, 2008; 11 a.m. EDT.

Place: Via Teleconference: Public Dial In-1-800-597-7623, Conference 
ID<greek-i> 65389894.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning

    <bullet> FY 2008 Statutory Report: Enforcing Religious Freedom in 
Prison
    <bullet> FY 2009 Briefing Topic: Employers' Rights to Specify 
English as the Language of the Workplace

III. Future Agenda Items
IV. Adjourn

Contact Person for Further Information:  Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting 
Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582.

    Dated: September 18, 2008.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8-22236 Filed 9-18-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**
101

 

**Exhibit 31.1**
I, Lawrence M. Kimbrough, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First CharterCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 10, 2004     /s/ Lawrence M. Kimbrough   Lawrence M. Kimbrough President and Chief Executive Officer
102
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Normand Gamache

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00172-JL

Amerigas Propane, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

June 26, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (doc. #10) is approved as submitted.

Paragraphs 3 and 8 of the defendant’s answer (doc. #7) are

amended to reflect the year 2007, as opposed to 2006.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 26, 2008

cc: Robert W. Upton, II, Esq.

Christopher T. Vrountas, Esq.

William C. Saturley, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00172-JL Document 14 Filed 06/26/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02219-LTB-CBS

ELVIS BAKER, individually and as heir of Doris Baker, 

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID THOMSON, and

GREYHOUND LINES, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

___________________________________________________________________________

BY ORDER OF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Defendants’ Motion to Amend Caption (Doc 37 - filed May 15, 2012) is DENIED AS

MOOT as a result of this Court’s Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion to File An Amended

Complaint (Doc 35). As a result of accepting the tendered Amended Complaint (Doc 36), the

caption of the action is as set forth above.

Dated: May 16, 2012

__________________________________________________________________________

Case 1:11-cv-02219-LTB-CBS Document 38 Filed 05/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 867 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 6, 2008. 

Whereas the Houston Dynamo soccer team won the 2007 

Major League Soccer Cup, defeating the New England 

Revolution by a score of 2–1 at RFK Stadium on November 18, 2007; 

Whereas as the Houston Dynamo came back from a 1–0 halftime deficit to defeat the Revolution; 

Whereas as Dwayne De Rosario, assisted on the tying goal 

to Joseph Ngwenya, scored the winning goal and was 

named the game’s MVP; 

Whereas as the Houston Dynamo were playing without Brian 

Ching, the MVP of last year’s MLS Cup due to injury; 

Whereas as the Houston Dynamo has won the Major League 

Soccer Cup for the second consecutive year; 

Whereas as the Houston Dynamo is the first team to win 

back-to-back MLS Cups in 10 years; 

Whereas as the Houston Dynamo have won the MLS Cup in 

their first 2 years of existence in Houston; 

Whereas Houston Dynamo Coach Dominic Kinnear has guided the team to 26 wins, 20 draws, and 16 losses in his 

first 2 seasons in Houston; and 
2 

•HRES 867 EH 

Whereas Houston Dynamo defender Eddie Robinson and 

midfielder Dwayne De Rosario were named to the 2007 

MLS Best XI all-star team: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) commends the Houston Dynamo soccer team for 

winning the 2007 MLS Cup; and 

(2) congratulates the team for back-to-back MLS 

Cup wins in their first 2 seasons in Houston. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maurice Wynn, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 717]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.), rendered April 14, 2004, *577convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Police officers in an unmarked car in a drug-prone area believed they had witnessed a drug transaction as they observed the defendant holding money after making a hand-to-hand exchange of a small object. As the officers pulled up to the subject location, the defendant ducked behind a parked van. At that point, the officers exited their vehicle and approached the defendant, who dropped the money and walked away. He ignored an officer’s inquiries and started running. One of the officers chased the defendant. During the chase, the officer saw the defendant drop a plastic bag which he believed contained, and did in fact, contain cocaine on the sidewalk and discard a handgun in a nearby lot. The Supreme Court denied suppression of the cocaine and the gun.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s argument that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to pursue him is preserved for appellate review *(see People v Baez,*13 AD3d 463 [2004]; *cf. People v Martin,*50 NY2d 1029, 1031 [1980]). At the suppression hearing, the defendant challenged the basis for the officers’ conduct and the People were afforded “a fair opportunity to present their proof on that issue” *(People v Martin, supra*at 1031; *cf. People v Underwood,*126 AD2d 584 [1987]; *People v Jones,*81 AD2d 22, 41-42 [1981]).

However, the hearing court properly denied suppression of the gun and cocaine. The officers observed “specific circumstances” which, coupled with the defendant’s flight, gave them reasonable suspicion to pursue the defendant *(People v Sierra,*83 NY2d 928, 929 [1994]; *see People v Leung,*68 NY2d 734 [1986]). Since the pursuit of the defendant was justified, the gun and cocaine that he discarded during the pursuit were lawfully recovered *(see People v Sierra, supra*at 930; *People v Leung, supra*at 736-737; *People v Brogdon,*8 AD3d 290, 291-292 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
First Department,

July, 2002

(July 2, 2002)

#### Cleora Borowski, Respondent, v Arnold Falleder, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 177]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered on or about May 29, 2001, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint and awarded her the sum of $36,879.83, plus interest and dismissed defendant’s cross motion to dismiss on the grounds that the action was time barred or, in the alternative, that the loan in question was usurious, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, defendant’s cross motion to dismiss on the ground that the loan was usurious granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant, dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiffs action is based on the promissory notes which purported to obligate defendant to repay personal loans at an interest rate of at least 18% per annum. General Obligations Law § 5-501 deems a loan usurious if it exceeds 16% per annum (see, *Tri-Land, Props. v 115 W. 28th St. Corp.,*260 AD2d 295, 296). Usurious loans are void as a matter of law; the borrower is relieved of all further obligations to pay both the principal and interest (General Obligations Law § 5-511 [2]; *see, Pemper v. Reifer,*264 AD2d 625). A search of the record reveals that the loan was extended by plaintiff to defendant in his personal capacity. The loan check was made out directly to defendant. Recitations which refer to a business owned by defendant or the evidence substantiating corporate uses for the loan do not convert a personal loan into a corporate loan which would render the defense of usury unavailable *(see, Seidel v 18 E. 17th St. Owners,*79 NY2d 735, 740). Given the undisputed personal obligation created by the loan and the uncontroverted interest rate in excess of that allowed by statute, defendant’s cross motion to dismiss should have been granted. Concur— Williams, P.J., Saxe, Buckley, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.