alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 07-14-00390-CR

April Hope Gallardo

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 64th District Court

of Castro County

March 27, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 27, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending December 8, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBIG MAC BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                CICNotice submitted by Troy and Crystal Faulkender, Oakley, Kansas; Jay and Brandy Todd, Hoxie, Kansas; Darvin and Tammi Strutt, Colby, Kansas; Sharon and Ronnie Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas; Crystal Ann Trauer, trustee of the Laurence Duane Trauer Tax Shelter Trust and the Crystal Ann Trauer Revocable Trust, both in Hays, Kansas; Nichole and Bret Tremblay, Manhattan, Kansas; Leslea and Brett Oelke, Hoxie, Kansas; Brittany Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas, Taylore Schamberger, Hoxie, Kansas; Jerry and Melissa Spresser, Hoxie, Kansas; Larry and Julie Spresser, Pittsburg, Kansas; and Brian and Sheri Baalman, Menlo, Kansas; as a group acting in concert, to acquire control of Big Mac Bancshares, Inc., Hoxie, Kansas, parent of Peoples State Bank, McDonald, Kansas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableHOPE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                   * 3A5Hope Bancshares, Inc., Hope, Kansas, to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of ABM Holding Company, parent of The Citizens State Bank, both in Miltonvale, Kansas.Newspaper: 12/19/2012Federal Register: 12/20/2012KCB BANK                                                                                                                * BranchKCB Bank, Kearney, Missouri, to establish a branch at 110 S. Stewart Road, Liberty, Missouri.Newspaper: 12/15/2012Federal Register: Not applicableMARTHA E. RECORDS 2009 GST EXEMPT FAMILY TRUST                                                                          CICNotice submitted by Ellen Records Morgan, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as co-trustee, to acquire control of the Martha E. Records 2009 GST Exempt Family Trust, the Martha E. Records 2009 Non-Exempt Family Trust, the Kathryn R. Ryan 2007 GST Exempt Family Trust, and the Kathryn R. Ryan 2007 Non-Exempt Family Trust, all of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and thereby acquire control of additional shares of Midland Financial Co., parent of MidFirst Bank, both of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 12/28/2012PREMIER BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                3A1Premier Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Premier Bank, both in Omaha, Nebraska.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
                                December 31, 1999


The following significant subsidiaries are consolidated in the financial
statements submitted as a part of this report:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Jurisdiction of            Percentage of
                                                                    Incorporation                 Voting
                                                                                                Securities
                                                                                                  Owned
<S>                                                                <C>                        <C>
Controlled by Campbell Resources Inc.:
         Meston Resources Inc.                                           Quebec                    100%
         Sotula Gold Corp.                                               Canada                    100%

Controlled by  (i) Campbell Resources Inc. and                           Mexico                    100%
               (ii) Sotula Gold Corp.
         Oro de Sotula, S.A. de C.V.

Controlled by Meston Resources Inc.
         Minera Cerro Quema, S.A.                                        Panama                    100%
</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending April 27, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCENTRAL STATE BANK                                                                                                      * 18C
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 30, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00956-CV 

IN RE INTEGRITY MARKETING GROUP, LLC, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-01036-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

In this original proceeding, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial 

court’s order denying relator’s motion to compel certain discovery. Entitlement to 

mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its 

discretion and that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. 

Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator 

has failed to demonstrate entitlement to the relief requested. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

 
 –2– 

We also deny as moot relator’s emergency motion to stay the lower court 

proceedings. 

240956F.P05 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2007: Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

 Q4... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.2

2009: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 6.1

 Q2... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.1

 Q4... 6.4 6.2 n.a. 6.1

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2007: Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 6.9 7.2 6.8

2009: Q1... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.8

 Q2... 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q3... 6.9 7.2 7.2 6.9

 Q4... 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.8

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2007: Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q4... 6.8 6.5 6.6 6.9

2009: Q1... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1

 Q2... 6.9 6.6 6.6 6.9

 Q3... 6.7 6.4 6.7 7.1

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q4... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.0 6.7

 Q4... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.6

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

 Q4... n.a. 6.4 6.6 6.5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2007: Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 7.0 6.8

2009: Q1... n.a. 6.4 6.8 6.9

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.2 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.1

 Q4... n.a. 6.9 7.2 7.0

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
AO 467 (Rev. 01/09) Order Requiring a Defendant to Appear in the District Where Charges are Pending and Transferring Bail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

District of Colorado

United States of America ) . _
v. ) Case No. Il-mj-oll3e-MEH
: ) ; sn Bry)
Donna Jean ha rschni vay ) Charging District: Ar’? ZOMG CTucson DW
Defendant ) Charging Distrct’s Case No, ef UU CF OOF S-CKS

ORDER REQUIRING A DEFENDANT TO APPEAR IN THE DISTRICT
WHERE CHARGES ARE PENDING AND TRANSFERRING BAIL
\ a
ee a After a hearing jn this court, the defendant is released from custody and ordered to appear in the district court
where the charges are pending to answer those charges. If the time to appear in that court has not yet been set, the !
defendant must appear when notified to do so. Otherwise, the time and place to appear in that court are:

Places PENG Waeran, Prermal SECVTCES |CourtwomrNes
HOS west Congress 2nd floor

Tucson, AZ BS 0\ Date and Time: QUalacit at 1AM
The clerk is ordered to transfer any bail deposited in the registry of this court to the clerk of the court where the
charges are pending.
Date: 4 tt

Judge's {inate

Mohael E. Heaarky U8. madisirale
Printad name aud Vitle i Mudge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             552
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,938
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     31,793
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             715
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               715
<LOANS>                                         34,501
<ALLOWANCE>                                        308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,757
<DEPOSITS>                                      35,593
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,917
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                479
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  71,757
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,040
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,455
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    44
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,539
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,148
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,391
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       66
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  43
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    712
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         712
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        248
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  308
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               308
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02291-BNB

VERNE JAY MERRELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID ALLRED, D.O. FCC Health Services, and

PATRICIA MITCHELL, Program Mgt [sic] Officer, Health Services,

In Their Individual and Professional Capacities,

Defendants.

 

ORDER AND DRAWING CASE

 

After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.2C, the court has determined that

this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the

case will be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR

8.2D. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate

judge.

DATED December 7, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Boyd N. Boland 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02291-REB-MJW Document 20 Filed 12/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

The following certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. The certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.

CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report
of MSC.Software Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam M. Auriemma, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ SAM M. AURIEMMA                              
|                     |  |     |  | SAM M. AURIEMMA                                  
|                     |  |     |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Institutional Properties 2 1996 Year-End 10-K and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000719184
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES 2
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          18,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,636
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,070
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, John B. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer of UniFirst Corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                    |                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 13, 2008 | By: /s/ John B. Bartlett

 

John B. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer) |
#### DARNELL v. CARL’S MARKETS, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January Term 1954.

Dismissed without opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Monroe G. Milstein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  Monroe G. Milstein
Monroe G. Milstein
President and Chief Executive Officer [Principal Executive Officer]
August 26, 2005
#### In the Matter of Maria Ann P., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Dutchess County Department of Social Services, Appellant; Dino P., Respondent.

[745 NYS2d 717]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated July 31, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In a proceeding to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, the agency must, as a threshold matter, estab*575lish that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 371; *Matter of Chimere C.,*259 AD2d 615). In addition, those efforts must be tailored to the needs of the individual situation *(see Matter of Alex LL.,*270 AD2d 523).

The determination of the Family Court, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, should not be disturbed absent a showing that it is unsupported by the record *(see Salvati v Salvati,*221 AD2d 541). The record supports the Family Court’s determination that the petitioner failed to undertake diligent efforts to strengthen familial ties before seeking to terminate the respondent’s parental rights *(see Matter of Sheila G., supra; Matter of Little Flower Children’s Servs. [John Edward M. Hymes W.] v Selena Maria W.,*253 AD2d 556, 557; *Matter of Alex LL., supra; Matter of Jesus JJ.,*223 AD2d 955). In particular, the agency failed to tailor its efforts to the needs of this particular parent and child *(see Matter of Alex LL., supra; Matter of Jesus JJ., supra; Matter of Jessica UU.,*174 AD2d 98). O’Brien, J.P., Friedmann, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.