alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         855,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  172,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,769,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,800,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,169,358
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,090,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,800,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,071,468         
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             360,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                449,323
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            449,323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   449,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02255-BNB

ALI SALEH KAHLAH al-MARRI,

Applicant,

v.

BLAKE DAVIS, Warden, ADX Florence,

Respondent.

ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT

Applicant, through counsel, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and has paid the $5.00 filing fee. An initial review having

been completed, I direct assignment of the case to Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch, as

provided for under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1A. for further review and processing of the

action. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch,

pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1A.

DATED September 6, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:11-cv-02255-RPM Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 942 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 6, 2008. 

Whereas the first Africans were brought involuntarily to the 

shores of America as early as the 17th century; 

Whereas these Africans in America and their descendants are 

now known as African-Americans; 

Whereas African-Americans suffered involuntary servitude 

and subsequently faced the injustices of lynch mobs, segregation, and denial of basic, fundamental rights; 

Whereas despite involuntary servitude, African-Americans 

have made significant contributions to the economic, educational, political, artistic, literary, religious, scientific, 

and technological advancement of the Americas; 

Whereas in the face of injustices, United States citizens of 

good will and of all races distinguished themselves with 

their commitment to the noble ideals upon which the 

United States was founded and courageously fought for 

the rights and freedom of African-Americans; 

Whereas Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., lived and died to make 

real these noble ideals; 

Whereas the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick 

Douglass inspired the creation of Negro History Week, 

the precursor to Black History Month; 
2 

•HRES 942 EH 

Whereas Negro History Week represented the culmination of 

Dr. Carter G. Woodson’s efforts to enhance knowledge of 

black history started through the Journal of Negro History, published by Woodson’s Association for the Study 

of African-American Life and History; and 

Whereas the month of February is officially celebrated as 

Black History Month, which dates back to 1926, when 

Dr. Carter G. Woodson set aside a special period of time 

in February to recognize the heritage and achievement of 

Black Americans: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the significance of Black History 

Month as an important time to recognize the contributions of African-Americans in the Nation’s history, and 

encourages the continued celebration of this month to 

provide an opportunity for all peoples of the United 

States to learn more about the past and to better understand the experiences that have shaped the Nation; and 

(2) recognizes that the ethnic and racial diversity of 

the United States enriches and strengthens the Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

************************************* 

 * 

The Freedom From Religion * 

Foundation, et al. * 

 Plaintiffs * 

 * 

 v. * Civil Action No. 07-cv-356-SM 

 * 

The United States Congress, et al. * 

 Defendants * 

 * 

************************************* 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE NOTICE OF INTENT TO REPLY

 The State of New Hampshire (hereinafter “State”), by and through counsel, New 

Hampshire Attorney General Kelly A. Ayotte, and provides notice intent to file a reply to 

the objection to the motion to dismiss by Mach 11, 2008, as set out in the approved 

briefing order dated December 26, 2007. 

Respectfully submitted, 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

By its attorneys, 

KELLY A. AYOTTE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

/s/ Nancy J. Smith 

Nancy J. Smith, Bar No. 9085 

Senior Assistant Attorney General 

Civil Bureau 

33 Capitol Street 

Concord, New Hampshire 03301-6397 

(603) 271-1227 

nancy.smith@doj.nh.gov 

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 38 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Certification

February 21, 2008 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically 

and served electronically by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all 

counsel of record. 

 

 /s/ Nancy J. Smith 

 Nancy J. Smith 

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 38 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of MilacronInc.:
(1) Form S-8 No. 333-116414 pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan, (2) Forms S-8 Nos. 333-115948 and 333-115949 pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Retirement SavingsPlan, (3) Form S-8 No. 33-56403 pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan, (4) Form S-8 No. 333-69194 pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan, and (5) Form S-8 No. 333-74426 pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Plan for the Deferral of Directors’Compensation;
of our report dated June 28, 2005, with respect to Milacron Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Milacron Inc., included in this Form 10-K/A.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
#### Ellery R. BLUE HAIR, Appellant, v. Father Gary LANTZ, Appellee.

No. 02-3954.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 2003.

Decided Jan. 24, 2003.

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ellery R. Blue Hair appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal without prejudice of his civil complaint for lack of federal-question or diversity jurisdiction. For the reasons explained by the district court, we agree with the court that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action. *See Hansen v. United States,*248 F.3d 761, 763 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

1

. The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.
Case 1:11-cv-02208-LTB Document 4 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02208-LTB Document 4 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02208-LTB Document 4 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02208-LTB Document 4 Filed 08/26/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,785
<PP&E>                                          21,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,203
<BONDS>                                         34,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,608
<SALES>                                            978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,461
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (746)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David Clegg, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00300-JL

Gary Fischer, et al.

 O R D E R

Mistakenly believing that briefing on the motions had

closed, the court has been actively considering the dispositive

motions for several weeks. The court intended to hold a hearing

and rule on the motions in the second week of May, well in

advance of trial, which the court does not intend to continue. 

The court inadvertently overlooked (despite the filed notices)

that the parties did not intend to file replies until after the

court ruled on the motions to strike. (It is the court's normal

practice to handle motions to strike in dispositive motion

practice in the orders on the motions themselves; the court

apologizes for this administrative mix-up, which is in no way

counsel's fault.) 

The Deputy Clerk will schedule a hearing on all dispositive

motions during the week of May 10. All pending motions to strike

are denied, although counsel are free to argue the underlying 1

Document nos. 33, 35, 38 and 39. 1

Case 1:08-cv-00300-JL Document 42 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
rationales for the motions at oral argument on the summary

judgment motions. Leave is granted for summary judgment replies

(April 23 deadline; 10-page limit, limited to issues raised in

objections) and surreplies (April 30 deadline; 7 page limit,

limited to issues raised in replies). 

If the parties or counsel require or desire relief from this

schedule, they should arrange a conference call with the court

through the Deputy Clerk to take place on or before April 21.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: April 15, 2010

cc: Jeffrey R. Mazer, Esq.

David F. Bander, Esq.

Roger D. Turgeon, Esq.

Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.

R. Matthew Cairns, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00300-JL Document 42 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benigno LOPEZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50159.

D.C. No. CR-01-00884-RSWL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*369Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 14, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Benigno Lopez-Gomez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lopez-Gomez’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lopez-Gomez has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the *Anders*brief and our independent review of the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                 LARSCOM INCORPORATED
EXHIBIT 11.1

                                 LARSCOM INCORPORATED
               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                        (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                ----------------------------
                                                   1997              1996
                                                ---------         ----------
                                                        (Unaudited)
<S>                                             <C>                <C>
Net income                                      $   1,334          $      357 
                                                ---------          ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding:                       
Class A and B Common Stock                         17,996              14,193 
                                                ---------          ----------
                        
Net income per share (1)                        $    0.07          $     0.03
                                                ---------          ----------
</TABLE>

----------
(1)  Net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 1996 is
supplemental and is calculated as described in Note 1 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of the Company's Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Steven
      Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, that:





|1. | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
              March
              31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or
              78o(d)); and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:
      May
      15, 2008




BY:  /s/
      Steven Strasser


Steven
      Strasser


Chief
      Executive Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
      63
      of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
      disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      32.01**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 14, 2007
            /s/
                Douglas G. MannerDouglas
                G. Manner,Chief
                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 

26 

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 9 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
EFILED Document 

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD 

Filing Date: Nov 9 2010 3:36PM MST 

Filing ID: 34271276 

Review Clerk: Kari S Elizalde

Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 9 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02268-WJM-KLM Document 9 Filed 08/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 6 Diffusion Indexes of Industrial Production  Year
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.One Month Earlier2010
64.4
56.4
65.7
67.0
66.0
52.6
61.9
52.6
52.2
55.1
52.9
60.92011
57.7
54.2
56.1
46.8
53.2
49.7
57.1
52.9
51.9
58.0
52.2
65.72012
59.0
62.8
42.6
63.3
52.2
55.8
52.9
37.8Three Months Earlier2010
68.6
62.2
69.2
67.0
69.9
66.7
60.9
58.0
58.3
55.8
54.2
57.42011
62.5
62.5
61.9
51.9
54.8
53.5
56.4
51.0
57.1
55.8
59.3
65.12012
68.3
73.1
61.9
57.1
48.1
58.7
51.0
47.8Six Months Earlier2010
69.6
64.1
65.7
72.1
72.4
72.1
69.9
68.6
64.1
63.5
57.1
63.82011
59.0
61.2
63.1
59.6
59.3
57.1
57.4
53.2
51.9
58.7
57.4
62.82012
67.9
72.8
62.8
69.6
64.7
59.6
57.7
48.7      Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cragar
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal Quarter ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard P. Franke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)); and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                            /s/ Richard P. Franke
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard P. Franke
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            May 15, 2003