alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of First Oak  Brook Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 1996,
included in the 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of First Oak Brook
Bancshares, Inc.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-24145) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.
Employees' Savings and Stock Ownership Plan and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-82800) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. 1987 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 17, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1995.



                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 20, 1996
#### Adasa Irmiyayeva et al., Respondents, v Joseph C. Thompson et al., Respondents, and Avshalum Rabayev et al., Appellants.

[745 NYS2d 199]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Avshalum Rabayev and Galia Shamailova appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated July 3, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants; and it is further,

Ordered that upon searching the record, so much of the order as denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for summary judgment against the defendants Joseph Thompson and Anna Thompson on the issue of liability is vacated, and that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

This action involves a rear-end collision in which the plaintiffs were passengers in a vehicle owned by the appellant Galia Shamailova and driven by the appellant Avshalum *440Rabayev. The vehicle was struck from the rear by a vehicle driven by the defendant Joseph Thompson and owned by the defendant Anna Thompson.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, upon the appellants’ prima facie showing that this was a réar-end collision caused when the Thompsons’ vehicle struck their stopped vehicle from the rear, the burden shifted to the Thompsons to provide a nonnegligent explanation as to how the accident occurred *(see Girolamo v Liberty Lines Tr.,*284 AD2d 371; *Cacace v DiStefano,*276 AD2d 457; *Mascitti v Greene,*250 AD2d 821, 822). The Thompsons’ excuse that the appellants’ vehicle changed lanes and suddenly stopped was insufficient to rebut the presumption of their negligence in causing the accident and to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Johnson v Phillips,*261 AD2d 269, 271; *Cohen v Terranella,*112 AD2d 264; *Mascitti v Greene, supra; Leal v Wolff,*224 AD2d 392). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the appellants’ motion.

Furthermore, although the plaintiffs did not appeal from the denial of their cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of the Thompsons’ liability, this Court has the inherent power to search the record and grant summary judgment where appropriate *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]). Therefore, upon searching the record, the plaintiffs’ cross motion is granted. Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending October 21, 2017FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADIRONDACK TRUST COMPANY EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST, THE                                                            * 3A3The Adirondack Trust Company Employee Stock Ownership Trust, Saratoga Springs, New York, to acquire fifty additional shares of 473 Broadway Holding Corporation and two thousand additional shares of The Adirondack Trust Company, both of Saratoga Springs, New York.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableEMPIRE STATE BANK                                                                                                       * BranchEmpire State Bank, Newburgh, New York to establish a branch office to be located at 1698 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., THE                                                                                          InvestmentThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., New York, New York, provides prior notice of an overseas investment, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableMANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY                                                                                 PWIManufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York, seeks prior approval to make a public welfare investment, pursuant to Section 208.22(d) of Regulation H.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
IB

Union Calendar No. 199

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062

[Report No. 107–274, Part I]

To extend the effective period of the consent of Congress to the interstate

compact relating to the restoration of Atlantic salmon to the Connecticut

River Basin and creating the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 2001

Mr. OLVER (for himself, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr.

BASS, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Ms. DELAURO, Mr.

MALONEY of Connecticut, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, and Mr.

SHAYS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Reported from the Committee on Resources with an amendment

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Referral to the Committee on the Judiciary extended for a period ending not

later than November 16, 2001

NOVEMBER 16, 2001

Referral to the Committee on the Judiciary extended for a period ending not

later than December 7, 2001

DECEMBER 7, 2001

Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed to the Committee of the

Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
2

•HR 2062 RH

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 5, 2001]

A BILL

To extend the effective period of the consent of Congress

to the interstate compact relating to the restoration of

Atlantic salmon to the Connecticut River Basin and creating the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONNECTICUT RIVER ATLANTIC SALMON COM4 PACT.

5 (a) EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF CONGRESSIONAL CON6 SENT.—Section 3(2) of Public Law 98–138 (97 Stat. 870)

7 is amended by striking ‘‘twenty years’’ and inserting ‘‘40

8 years’’.

9 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Public

10 Law 98–138 (97 Stat. 866) is amended by adding at the

11 end the following:

12 ‘‘SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

13 ‘‘There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec14 retary of the Interior to carry out the activities of the Con15 necticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission $5,000,000 for

16 each of fiscal years 2002 through 2010.’’.

Union Calendar No. 199

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062

[Report No. 107–274, Part I]

A BILL

To extend the effective period of the consent of

Congress to the interstate compact relating tothe restoration of Atlantic salmon to the Connecticut River Basin and creating the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, andfor other purposes.

DECEMBER 7, 2001

Committee on the Judiciary discharged; committed to the

Committee of the Whole House on the State of theUnion and ordered to be printed
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Lonny L. CRIFFIELD, Sergeant, U.S. Air Force, Appellant.

No. 96-1149.

Crim.App. No. 31687.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

Argued Oct. 8, 1997.

Decided Feb. 3, 1998.

For Appellant: *Captain Margo Stone Newton*(argued); *Lieutenant Colonel Kim L. Sheffield*and *Major Gerald R. Bruce*(on brief); *Colonel Jay L. Cohen, Colonel Douglas H. Kohrt*and *Captain Harold M. Vaught.*

For Appellee: *Lieutenant Colonel Michael J. Breslin*(argued); *Colonel Theodore J. Fink*(on brief); *Captain Allen G. Erickson.*

PER CURIAM:

Appellant alleges that his conviction for possession of a homemade silencer is multi-plicious with his convictions for wrongfully making and wrongfully transporting the firearm silencer, all charged under the assimila-tive crimes portion of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, which incorporated 26 USC § 5861(d), (e), and (f).

At trial, defense counsel moved to dismiss the specification alleging wrongful transfer of the silencer as being multiplieious for both findings and sentencing with the specification of possession of the silencer. The military judge found that they were not multiplieious for any purpose but, instead, ruled that the specification for making the silencer was multiplieious with the specification for possession of the silencer and instructed the members that they were to consider these offenses as one for sentencing purposes. The members sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, hard labor without confinement for 30 days, a $500.00 fine, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.

Although the judge was within his discretion to treat these offenses as multiplieious for sentencing, we hold that the judge did not err as a matter of law by finding that the offenses were not multiplieious for findings. See *United States v. Neblock,*45 MJ 191, 198-99 (1996).

The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the filing of HomeLife,  Inc.'s (the  "Company")  Quarterly
Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  February  28,  2005,  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Marie
M. May,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        / s / Marie M. May
                                        --------------------------
                                        Marie M. May
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Date:  April 14, 2005
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1993: Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Q4... 92.3 44.5 47.7 .8 1.5 .2 7.1 9.6 4.9

2005: Q1... 89.3 45.0 44.3 -3.2 1.1 -7.2 5.9 8.7 3.3

 Q2... 93.5 46.2 47.3 4.7 2.7 6.6 5.1 7.7 2.7

 Q3... 96.7 47.1 49.5 3.4 2.0 4.8 5.7 7.4 4.0

 Q4... 97.5 47.6 49.9 .9 1.0 .8 5.7 6.9 4.6

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 905 

Commending the Valdosta State University Blazers on winning the NCAA 

Division II National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. KINGSTON (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Valdosta State University Blazers on 

winning the NCAA Division II National Championship. 

Whereas on Saturday, December 15, 2007, the Valdosta 

State Blazers defeated Northwest Missouri State 25 to 

20 with a fourth quarter comeback; 

Whereas Valdosta State became the eighth school to win 

more than one Division II Championship; 

Whereas Michael Terry’s one-yard game-winning touchdown 

run with 22 seconds left was the third latest game-winning score in regulation play in the 35-year Division II 

Championship history; 

Whereas the Valdosta State Blazers hold a 13 and 1 season 

record; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 905 IH 

Whereas the Valdosta State won the Division II championship in 2004, making this the second Division II championships in the last 4 years for the Blazers; 

Whereas the Blazers’ head coach, David Dean, became the 

second first-year head coach to lead his squad to the Division II Championship; 

Whereas the Valdosta State Blazers play with tremendous 

heart, talent, and sportsmanship; and 

Whereas Valdosta State University continues to build its 

football legacy along with engaging academics: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives commends the Valdosta State University 

3 Blazers for winning the NCAA Division II National 

4 Championship. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending May 16, 2015FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodAMBANK COMPANY, INC.                                                                                                    * 3A3Ambank Company, Inc., Sioux Center, Iowa proposes to acquire 100 percent of Alton Bancorporation, Alton, Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire Community Bank, Alton, Iowa.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 05/29/2015FIRST ILLINOIS CORPORATION                                                                                              * 3A1First Illinois Corporation and HPB Holdings, Inc. to become bank holding companies upon the conversion of Hickory Point Bank and Trust, FSB, all of Decatur, Illinois, from a federal savings bank to a commercial bank, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act.Newspaper: 06/06/2015Federal Register: 06/11/2015HINSDALE BANK & TRUST COMPANY                                                                                           * 18C
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1
                                                                    ------------

     SECTION 7.     GENERAL PROVISIONS.

     (a) No Assignment.  No portion of any Bonus Award may be assigned or
         -------------                                                   
transferred otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution
prior to the payment thereof.

     (b) Tax Requirements.  All payments of Bonus Awards shall be subject to
         ----------------                                                   
withholding in respect of income and other taxes required by law to be withheld,
in accordance with the Company's customary procedures.

     (c) No Additional Rights.  A Designated Executive shall not have any right
         --------------------                                                  
to be retained in the employ of the Company or any subsidiary, and the right of
the Company or any subsidiary to dismiss or discharge any Designated Executive
or to terminate any arrangement pursuant to which any such Designated Executive
provides services to the Company and its subsidiaries is specifically reserved.

     (d) No Right to Participate.  Nothing in this Plan will be deemed to give a
         -----------------------                                                
Designated Executive or any other person a contract or right to participate in
the benefits of the Plan.  The selection of an individual as a Designated
Executive or otherwise to receive Bonus Awards and the determination of the
amount of any Bonus Award by the Committee shall be final and binding on all
persons.

     (e) Liability.  The Board of Directors and the Committee shall be entitled
         ---------                                                             
to rely on the advice of counsel and other experts, including the independent
certified public accountants for the Company or any subsidiary.  No member of
the Board of Directors or of the Committee or any officers of the Company or any
subsidiary shall be liable for any act or failure to act under the Plan.

     (f) Other Compensation Arrangements.  Nothing contained in the Plan shall
         -------------------------------                                      
prevent the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company from adopting
or continuing in effect other compensation arrangements, which arrangements may
be either generally applicable or applicable only to designated individuals
including the Designated Executives.

     SECTION 8.     AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF THE PLAN.  The Board of
Directors may at any time terminate, in whole or in part, or from time to time
amend the Plan; provided, that no such amendment or termination shall materially
adversely affect the rights of any individual with respect to Bonus Awards
announced by the Committee.  The Board of Directors may at any time and from
time to time delegate to the Committee any or all of its authority under this
Section 8.
1 “[#19]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by

the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-01742-REB-MEH

CHRISTINE ARAGON,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP, a Texas limited partnership,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#19]1 filed

October 19, 2011. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation

should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice [#19] filed October 19, 2011, is

APPROVED;

2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for June 22, 2012, is VACATED;

3. That the jury trial set to commence July 9, 2012, is VACATED; and

4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own

attorney fees and costs. 

Dated October 20, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-01742-REB -MEH Document 20 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

Case 1:11-cv-01742-REB -MEH Document 20 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1624

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

under the Medicare Program of all oral anticancer drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio (for herself, Mr. HOBSON, Mr. FOLEY, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr.

BLUNT, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. EHRLICH,

and Mr. BENTSEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage under the Medicare Program of all oral

anticancer drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Cancer

5 Therapies Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1624 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF ALL ANTICANCER ORAL

2 DRUGS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2)(Q) of the So4 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(Q)) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘chemotherapeutic agent for a given indica6 tion,’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘agent for a medi7 cally accepted indication (as defined in subsection

8 (t)(2)(B));’’.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

10 1834(j)(5)(F)(iv) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

11 1395m(j)(5)(F)(iv)) is amended by striking ‘‘therapeutic’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply with respect to drugs furnished

14 on or after the date that is 90 days after the date of the

15 enactment of this Act.

Æ