alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 11





                             GIBSON GREETINGS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (In thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                       --------------------------------

                                                        1997        1996         1995
                                                       -------     -------     --------
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income (loss)                                      $21,598     $21,962     $(46,489)
                                                       =======     =======     ========

Basic weighted average shares outstanding               16,379      16,094       16,085
Effect of dilutive securities - stock options held
    by employees                                           561         235           --
                                                       -------     -------     --------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding             16,940      16,329       16,085
                                                       =======     =======     ========

Net income (loss) per share:
    Basic                                              $  1.32     $  1.36     $  (2.89)
                                                       =======     =======     ========
    Diluted                                            $  1.27     $  1.34     $  (2.89)
                                                       =======     =======     ========
</TABLE>

During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 128--"Earnings Per Share." All previously
reported net income (loss) per share amounts have been restated to conform
to the new presentation under SFAS No. 128.




                                       43
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2



                Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Span-America Medical Systems, Inc.

We have audited the statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows of
Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. for the year ended October 2, 1999. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Span-America
Medical Systems, Inc. for the year ended October 2, 1999, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.


                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greenville, SC
October 27, 1999
#### 112 Duane Associates, LLC, Respondent, v Pamela S. Malkani, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 430]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), dated June 22, 2001, which denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to renew the branch of the plaintiffs prior motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the fifth counterclaim, which was determined in an order of the same court, dated December 15, 2000, and failed to determine that branch of her motion which was to impose a sanction upon the plaintiff.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as failed to determine that branch of the motion which was to impose a sanction against the plaintiff is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to renew *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]).

Additionally, the defendant’s appeal from so much of the order as failed to determine that branch of the motion which was to impose a sanction upon the plaintiff must be dismissed, as that branch of the motion remains pending and undecided *(see*
      *389
      *Katz v Katz,*68 AD2d 536, 543). Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and Adams, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES D. WELCH, individually and as Executive Trustee of Celestial Pursuits Trust,

AMRA WELCH, as nominee/alter ego of James D. Welch,

CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC., and

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

_____________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate and Reset

Scheduling/Planning Conference [Docket No. 10; Filed November 4, 2011] (the

“Motion”).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for November 14,

2011 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to January 5, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. in

Courtroom C-204 of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street,

Denver, Colorado.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling

order pursuant to the District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures. The

parties shall submit the proposed scheduling order no later than December 30, 2011.

Dated: November 4, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM Document 12 Filed 11/04/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2




              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







August 14, 2002                       /s/ J. BRYANT KIRKLAND III
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danny Freeman, Appellant.

[744 NYS2d 719]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belli, J.), rendered July 21, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Where, as here, “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [the] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation,” the constitutional requirement of effective assistance of counsel is satisfied *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 21, 2014.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 21, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A14I0239. 2010-1 SFG VENTURE LLC et al. v. LEE BANK & TRUST COMPANY.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV226733
#### Fred J. Sichel, Appellant, v Louis Polak et al., Respondents.

[744 NYS2d 328]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about June 19, 2001, which, in an action to rescind a limited partnership agreement and to restore plaintiff’s title to the building *325constituting the partnership’s main asset, (1) referred defendants’ accounting to a Special Referee to hear and report, (2) determined that for purposes of the accounting, plaintiff and the three defendants each have a 25% interest in what is to be deemed a de facto general partnership, and (3) denied plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants to give him full possession of and a quitclaim deed to the building, and to turn over to him all of the building’s books and records and money collected in connection with its operation, with leave to renew after the accounting hearing before the Special Referee, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate (2) above, and as to (3) grant plaintiff’s motion only to the extent of directing defendant to execute and deliver a quitclaim deed within 10 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

To the extent that the order on appeal suggests that the building be included with the assets to be divided equally among the partners, it contravenes a prior order and judgment of another Justice, affirmed by this Court, awarding plaintiff full title to the building (227 AD2d 192, *lv dismissed*89 NY2d 860), which shall be delivered forthwith by quitclaim deed. To the extent that the order directs the manner of distribution of partnership assets other than title to the building, it is premature, as the very purpose of the hearing on plaintiff’s objections to defendant’s accounting, previously ordered by this Court but yet to be conducted, is to assist the court “in ultimately determining the rights and liabilities of the parties” (267 AD2d 123). We have considered and rejected plaintiff’s other arguments, as well as defendants’ argument that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that plaintiff was not aggrieved. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andidas, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Andre Y. Fortier, President and Chief Executive Officer of Campbell Resources
Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year
ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Campbell Resources Inc.

Date: March 31, 2006.


                                       By: /s/ Andre Y. Fortier
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Andre Y. Fortier
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         163,033
<SECURITIES>                                   155,368
<RECEIVABLES>                                  275,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,782)
<INVENTORY>                                    209,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               815,968
<PP&E>                                       1,944,671
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,067,927)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,899,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          295,732
<BONDS>                                        132,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       759,609
<OTHER-SE>                                     496,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,899,057
<SALES>                                      1,806,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,806,351
<CGS>                                        1,335,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,335,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                294,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (112,258)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            181,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   181,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.54
<FN>
<F1>EPS-PRIMARY IS ACTUALLY EPS-BASIC
</FN>


</TABLE>
-1-

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Criminal Case No. 11-cr-00345-WYD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

1. JUAN FRANCISCO-MIGUEL, a/k/a Juan Thomas, a/k/a Juan Andres Francisco, 

a/k/a Jesse Martinez , 

Defendant. 

MINUTE ORDER 

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL 

A Change of Plea hearing is set for Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 

Counsel for the parties shall deliver all change of plea documents separately to 

Judge Daniel=s chambers AND to the Probation Department not later than 72 

HOURS before the hearing date. If the documents are not timely submitted, the 

hearing will be VACATED. There will be no exceptions to this policy, and sanctions 

may be imposed for failure to comply. 

Dated: January 4, 2012 

Case 1:11-cr-00345-WYD Document 15 Filed 01/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**BOVIE
MEDICAL CORPORATION**
 
 
 EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Bovie Medical Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Andrew Makrides,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 USC §1350 as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the annual
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the annual
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: August
25, 2005
 
 
 
 /s/
      Andrew MakridesActing
      Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 1448 Texas Ave., Texas City, TX 
77590, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66050416480a07040e1726020e1548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07646577296b66656f7647636f7429606871">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 26, 
2006. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for 
September 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program 
Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 
20229, (202) 344-1060.

    Dated: January 31, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
 [FR Doc. E8-2300 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM
     10-QSB  FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED  OCTOBER  31,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  MAY-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                               1,241
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          484
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          1,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,313
<PP&E>                                                 168
<DEPRECIATION>                                          36
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       3,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,470
<BONDS>                                                 60
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,581
<OTHER-SE>                                            (354)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         3,899
<SALES>                                              3,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,306
<CGS>                                                2,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (210)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (252)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 02-cv-00311-RPM

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, LLC,

Defendant,

v.

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,

Additional Party on Counterlcaim.

ORDER FOR REMOVAL OF EXHIBITS

Upon consideration of Defendant Molychem’s unopposed Motion to Permit Temporary

Removal of ITC hearing exhibits from the Custody of the Clerk for the Purpose of Making

Copies (Doc. # 195), it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and that the exhibits will be returned to the Clerk

within 72 hours after their release.

DATED: February 6th , 2007

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard P. Matsch

___________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 196 Filed 02/06/07 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1