alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority        Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

# Board Actions

## Actions taken during the week ending August 6, 2022

----

Advisory Councils            Insurance Policy Advisory Committee -- notice that the Board is accepting applications from individuals who wish to be considered for membership on the committee.            -Announced, August 1, 2022            Regulations and Policies            Credit Card Plans -- annual report to Congress on the profitability of credit card operations of depository institutions.            -Approved, July 18, 2022            (A/C)          Supervision and Regulation            Stress Tests -- (1) affirming the stress capital buffer requirements for Bank of America Corporation and Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, in response to their requests for reconsideration, and (2) directing staff to explore possible refinements to its models to inform continuing improvements in the stress testing methodology.            -Approved, August 3, 2022            
Release dates |     Full version (300 KB PDF)Board Actions |     Actions under delegated authority    Applications and reports received:
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2009 Q3 survey,

region share of national

total 2.6 8.8 25.1 23.2 7.8 5.5 5.0 8.3 5.1 8.7

Sample coverage, 2009 Q3

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 8.9 4.5 15.0 37.6 19.4 7.7 9.6 6.6 8.4 32.6

Avg. loan size, 2009 Q3 survey

(thousands of dollars) 30.0 51.4 36.6 83.6 62.2 33.4 50.1 30.3 49.1 81.1

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2004: Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

2007: Q1 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.9

Q2 8.1 8.6 8.1 8.4 7.7 8.6 8.6 9.1 9.4 8.6

Q3 10.4 8.6 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.9 8.9 9.5 8.6

Q4 7.4 8.6 7.5 7.3 6.8 8.1 8.6 8.6 8.9 7.6

(0.01) (0.16) (0.25) (0.55) (0.47) (0.41) (0.17) (0.23) (0.15) (0.22)

2008: Q1 7.3 7.8 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.4 7.8 7.2 7.8 6.3

(0.14) (0.28) (0.14) (0.63) (0.66) (0.67) (0.72) (0.21) (0.23) (0.10)

Q2 7.4 6.6 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.7 6.9 6.4 6.3 5.1

(0.30) (0.09) (0.26) (0.89) (0.49) (0.29) (0.40) (0.30) (0.34) (0.25)

Q3 5.7 7.2 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.0 7.2 6.1 6.5 5.0

(0.93) (0.19) (0.31) (1.25) (0.37) (0.72) (0.20) (0.24) (0.36) (0.36)

Q4 7.5 6.6 5.4 4.6 5.1 4.5 7.6 6.1 5.6 4.4

(0.07) (0.10) (0.52) (1.05) (0.67) (0.04) (0.72) (0.38) (0.61) (0.09)

2009: Q1 4.2 6.4 5.3 4.6 4.0 5.1 5.6 6.2 5.7 3.9

(0.34) (0.35) (0.35) (1.22) (0.95) (0.93) (0.64) (0.67) (0.32) (0.65)

Q2 4.2 6.4 4.9 4.6 3.7 4.8 6.5 5.7 5.8 4.2

(0.35) (0.16) (0.38) (1.20) (1.07) (0.19) (0.40) (0.36) (0.55) (0.25)

Q3 3.0 6.2 4.9 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.9 5.9 6.1 4.3

(0.24) (0.12) (0.44) (1.08) (0.85) (1.29) (0.19) (0.31) (0.46) (0.37)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 18 - 00372 - CR BAOQUOC TRAN NGUYEN, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1546160, Honorable John Weeks, Presiding

April 1 5 , 2020 

### CONCURRING OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS , JJ. I concur in the result for the reasons stated in Chief Justice Quinn’s concurring opinion, and for the further reason stated below. In Scott v. State , 322 S.W.3d 662, 669 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) , abrogated in part on other grounds by Wilson v. State, 448 S.W.3d 418, 422 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) , t he Court of Criminal Appeals held that the plain language of T EX . P ENAL C ODE § 42.07(a)(4) “does not implicate the free - speech guarantee of the First Amendment” because itprohibits conduct . As an example, the statute prohibits a person, with the requisit e intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another, from causing the telephone of another to ring repeatedly. Id. This prohibition is separate and distinct from the remainder of s ection 42.07(a)(4), including the expressive activity that a ppellant complains is protected by the First Amendment. The evidence shows the a ppellant encouraged others to engage in call floo ding: he provided telephone numbers so “people from all over the world can immediately start calling in and flood the phone lines disrupting utilities, disrupting the police, disrupting anybody that they have thus targeted with that phone number.” The jur y could therefore reasonably conclude from the evidence that a ppellant caused the telephone number of another to ring repeatedly, and that he did so with the intent to intent to harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, or embarrass another. Pizzo v. State , 2 35 S.W.3d 711, 715 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (holding that jury may find alternate forms of commission of an offense when the charging offense lists them in the disjunctive). As a ppellant fails to show how this non - expressive conduct affects a protected righ t to speak freely or petition the government, I would affirm the conviction because a discussion of constitutional issues is not necessary to disposition of the appeal. Lawrence M. Doss Justice Do not publish.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed November 10, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-70

Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-16267 CC, 19-307 AP

________________

Jared Lopez,

Appellant,

vs.

Dominic Cavagnuolo, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Gina 

Beovides, Judge.

Law Offices of Paul Morris, P.A., and Paul Morris; Black, Srebnick, 

Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A., and Jared Lopez and Robert T. Dunlap, for 

appellant.

Law Offices of Anthony Accetta, P.A., and Anthony Accetta; Law Office 

of Lazaro Vazquez, P.A., and Lazaro Vazquez, for appellees.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

EMAS, J.
2

Jared Lopez, Esquire, counsel for plaintiff below, appeals a final 

judgment awarding attorney’s fees against him as a sanction pursuant to 

section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2020).

Upon our review of the record, we affirm, and hold that the trial court 

committed no error in its determination that defendants were the prevailing 

party following the filing of a notice of voluntary dismissal, nor did the trial 

court abuse its discretion in its determination of the amount and 

reasonableness of the attorney’s fees to be awarded. See Lanson v. Reid, 

314 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (affirming sanctions under section 

57.105 and noting that an “award of attorney’s fees is a matter committed to 

sound judicial discretion which will not be disturbed on appeal, absent a 

showing of clear abuse of discretion”); Preferred Gov’t Ins. Trust v. Aelion, 

307 So. 3d 129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Sec. Pac. Credit Corp. v. Oasis Plaza 

Corp., 714 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). See also Yampol v. Schindler 

Elevator Corp., 186 So. 3d 616, 617 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (noting that, in 

Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 568 So. 2d 914 (Fla. 1990), the 

Florida Supreme Court established the general rule that “when a plaintiff 

voluntarily dismisses an action, the defendant is the prevailing party” and 

further noting “the Thornber Court did not exempt from its scope voluntary 
3

dismissals without prejudice”) (additional citations omitted). We reject 

without discussion the remaining claims raised by appellant.

As for any concern that this court’s disposition will have a preclusive 

effect on the pending dissociation claim in the circuit court (lower tribunal 

case number 18-25431), we note that the sanctions order on appeal in the 

instant case was premised on facts which are independent of and unrelated 

to that pending circuit court claim, and further note that pending circuit court 

claim is being pursued by a third party, Mark Iacono, and not by L24M, LLC.

Affirmed.
Case 1:11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW Document 9 Filed 10/12/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-165-PB

Jason Rowan

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for February 3, 2009, citing the need for

additional time to complete discovery and engage in plea

negotiations. The government does not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from February 3, 2009 to April 7, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00165-PB Document 11 Filed 01/21/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 27, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to March 25, 2009 at 4:15 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 21, 2009

cc: Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq.

Kenneth Perkes, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00165-PB Document 11 Filed 01/21/09 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1810

LINDA P. WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

Versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-2544-3-17BC)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linda P. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Hardwick Stuart, Jr., William

Kenneth Witherspoon, Claude E. Hardin, Jr., BERRY, ADAMS QUACKENBUSH & DUNBAR, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant’s claims

under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29

U.S.C. § 621 (1994) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),

42 U.S.C. § 1201 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellee’s motion to dismiss and affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Walker v. South Carolina Dep’t of Health & Environmental Control, No. CA-96-2544-3-17BC (D.S.C. May 6, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: April 09, 2007
PILLOWTEX
CORPORATION

4111 Mint Way
Dallas, Texas 75237-1605
214/333-3225, FAX 214/330-6016

October 22, 1996

VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Mr. Jim Ferguson
Span America Medical Systems, Inc.
70 Commerce Center
Greenville, South Carolina 29615

RE: LICENSE AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

Dear Jim:

This letter will acknowledge and confirm our mutual agreement to terminate
the License and Distribution Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of 
September 30, 1986 by and between Pillowtex Corporation ("Pillowtex") and 
Span America Medical Systems, Inc. ("Span"), such termination to be 
effective as of October 31, 1996.

In consideration of such termination and the mutual convenants contained 
herein, Span and Pillowtex agree as follows:


       1. Pillowtex agrees, for a period of 24 months from the effective
          date of the termination of the Agreement, not to manufacture or 
          sell any foam-related product to Target or JC Penney, or any of
          their current affiliates other than those foam-related products
          manufactured or sold by or for Span. In addition, Pillowtex
          agrees that its cost from Span for products sold to JC Penney
          and Target shall be increased effective as of November 4,1996 as  
          detailed on Attachment A hereto. Pillowtex further agrees to
          fully absorb such cost increase.


       2. Following termination of the Agreement, Pillowtex may place orders
          for foam-related products from Span on such terms and conditions
          as the parties agree, and Span agrees to use reasonable best efforts
          to fill such orders according to the terms and conditions thereof.

       3. Notwithstanding termination of the Agreement, Span agrees to fulfill
          all unfilled purchase orders delivered to Span by Pillowtex prior
          to termination of the Agreement.

<PAGE>

Span America Medical Systems, Inc.
October 22, 1996
Page Two

       4. The parties acknowledge that the Non-Employment provisions of
          paragraph 17 and the Confidentiality provisions of paragraph 16
          of the Agreement shall survive termination for a period of one
          year following the effective date of such termination. All other
          rights and obligations of the parties under the Agreement are 
          expressly terminable hereby.

If this letter correctly reflects our agreement, please so indicate in the
space below.

Sincerely,

/s/ Chris N. Baker

Chris N. Baker
President, Pillowtex Division

CNB/ra

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

Span America Medical Systems, Inc.

By: /s/ James D. Ferguson
Name: James D. Ferguson
Title: President/CEO
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending December 4, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION                                                                                             InvestmentBank of America, N.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, to make an indirect investment of $11 million in BANA Canada Funding Company Limited, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableOLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                               * 3A5
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133487 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133487 COA: 273245 Allegan CC: 05-014041-FH EDDIE C. POWELL, a/k/ a ELVIS LEE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
Certificate
Pursuant to Section 906


of
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002


CERTIFICATION
OF CEO




In connection with the annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Bovie Medical Corporation. (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the“Report”), the undersigned President and Chief
Executive Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.




Date:
September 18, 2009




/s/ Andrew MakridesAndrew
      MakridesPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Elyssa B. Slater

v. Civil No. 07-407-JL

Town of Exeter et al

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

March 3, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and should

be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any claims or

defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:07-cv-00407-JL Document 8 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

February 21, 2008

cc: Craig L. Staples, Esq.

Elaine M. Michaud, Esq.

Charles P. Bauer, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00407-JL Document 8 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending July 3, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodHARBOR BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                    * 3A1Harbor Bancorp, Inc., Edenton, North Carolina, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of West Town Savings Bank, Cicero, Illinois.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableSpring Capital                                                                                                          * 3A1Spring Capital, Chicago, Illinois, to become a bank holding company by acquiring Shelf Charter Bank, Chicago, Illinois.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableTOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                             CICNotice by Keith E. Busse, Fort Wayne, Indiana, as an individual, Keith E. Busse, Busse Family Investment Company, LLC, and Aaron T. Busse, as group acting in concert, to acquire 10 percent or more of the voting shares of Tower Financial Corporation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and thereby indirectly acquire Tower Bank & Trust Company, Fort Wayne, Indiana.Newspaper: 06/14/2010Federal Register: 07/16/2010TOWER FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                             CICNotice by John V. Tippmann, Sr., Fort Wayne, Indiana, as an individual, and John V. Tippmann, Sr., John McCarthy and Helen McCarthy, Richard Ley and Sally Ley, John Tippmann, Jr., Patrick Tippmann, and Brian Backstrom and Jennifer Backstrom, as a group acting in concert, to acquire 10 percent or more of the voting shares of Tower Financial Corporation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, and thereby indirectly acquire Tower Bank & Trust Company, Fort Wayne, Indiana.Newspaper: 06/14/2010Federal Register: 07/16/2010