alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2132 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2132

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using surplus funds to 
make any investment in securities, other than government and municipal 
                              securities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2001

  Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
 Sessions, Mr. Sununu, and Mr. Toomey) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using surplus funds to 
make any investment in securities, other than government and municipal 
                              securities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Economy Protection Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USING FEDERAL SURPLUS FUNDS TO INVEST IN PRIVATE 
              SECURITIES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the 
Treasury may not use surplus funds to make any investment in securities 
(within the meaning of the securities laws of the United States) other 
than government and municipal securities. For purposes of the preceding 
sentence, the term `surplus' shall have the meaning given to such term 
by section 3(7) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 
622(7)).
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 16, 2008, 8 a.m. to October 16, 2008, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 17, 2008, 73 FR 53880-53882.                 

                    The meeting will be held at the Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting date and time                           ( print page 57370)                        remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.                 

Dated: September 22, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E8-22849 Filed 10-1-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2131 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2131

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through 
                fiscal year 2004, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS.

    Section 805(a)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 
(22 U.S.C. 2431c(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``major''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO SUPPORT REDUCTION OF DEBT 
              UNDER THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961 AND TITLE I OF 
              THE AGRICULTURAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSISTANCE ACT OF 
              1954.

    (a) Reauthorization.--Section 806 of the Tropical Forest 
Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations for Fiscal Years After Fiscal 
Year 2001.--For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 
Credit Reform Act of 1990) for the reduction of any debt pursuant to 
this section or section 807, there are authorized to be appropriated to 
the President the following:
        ``(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.
        ``(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.
        ``(3) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 808(a)(1)(D) of the Tropical 
Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431f(a)(1)(D)) is amended 
by striking ``to appropriated under sections 806(a)(2) and 807(a)(2)'' 
and inserting ``to be appropriated under sections 806(a)(2), 807(a)(2), 
and 806(d)''.

SEC. 3. CHAIRPERSON OF THE ENTERPRISE FOR THE AMERICAS BOARD.

    Section 811(b)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 
(22 U.S.C. 2431i(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``from among the 
representatives appointed under section 610(b)(1)(A) of such Act or 
paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection'' and inserting ``and shall be the 
representative from the Department of State appointed under section 
610(b)(1)(A) of such Act''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Peter Damelio

V .

NH State Prison Warden etal

Civil No . 08-cv-500-JL

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judg e

Justo Arenas dated March 31, 2009, no objection having been filed; the Court has,

however, reviewed plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Reconsider) and Magistrate

Judge James R. Muirhead's Order thereon .

SO ORDERED.

April 20, 2009 /s/ .toseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Peter Damelio, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00500-JL Document 14 Filed 04/21/09 Page 1 of 1
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006...... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

1999: Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .7 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

2008: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .3 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6

 Q2... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .8 .9 .2 .7

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
#### MAYRONNE LUMBER & SUPPLY CO., Inc., v. BELLINA.

No. 14001.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 16, 1932.

John E. Fleury, of New Orleans, for appellant.

P. L. Fourehy, of New Orleans, for appellee.

JANVIER, J.

Beilina, a building contractor, having undertaken to construct a house for his sister, purchased from plaintiff corporation certain lumber and building supplies.

The first purchases for that house were made on December 1, 1926, and the last on February 3, 1927. These purchases totaled $1,421.99. Two payments on account were made. One of $1,000 on February 5, 1927, and one of $150 on February 9, 1927, leaving on the latter date a balance of $271.99. Later, commencing August 27, 1928, and ending November 6, 1928, Beilina made other purchases totaling $28.05. These other materials were delivered to and used on a construction work different from that for which the first materials referred to were purchased and to which they were delivered.

On August 21, 1930, this suit was filed, and on August 26, 1930, service of citation was made on Beilina. It thus appears that more than three years elapsed between the last delivery made for usé in the first contract and the service of citation. A plea of prescription of three years was sustained, and the entire suit dismissed.

Appellant contends that all the purchases were made on one open account, and that the prescription of three years commenced to run only from the last purchases made on November 6, 1928, and not from February 3, 1927. If this contention is sound, prescription had not accrued when the service of citation was made on defendant. But it is admitted that defendant’s request for separate accounts for each of his contracts had been complied with by plaintiff, and that, when Beilina was engaged in constructing several different houses at one time, plaintiff company opened on its books a separate account for each house, and charged to each such account only such material as was delivered for use in that particular contract.

It is also conceded that the purchases made in 1928 were delivered at a price different from that to which the earlier purchases were sent, and we feel that it cannot, under such circumstances, be said that they formed part of the same open account. For the later purchases amounting to $28.05, judgment should have been rendered for plaintiff.

An effort was made by defendant to show that, when he purchased materials from plaintiff, plaintiff’s .officials knew that the sales *800were not made for Ms account, but for account of the persons for whom be was doing tbe construction work. In bis efforts to prove this he has failed, and, accordingly, judgment should be rendered against him on those items which have been fully proven and on which prescription has not accrued.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that there is now judgment in favor of plaintiff for $28.05, with legal interest from judicial demand and for all costs.

Reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1753 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1753

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``M. 
                Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 419 
Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                            By Martha C. Morrison,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Roberson, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 830]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J.), rendered March 6, 2003, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of three years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of *People v Behlog*(74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision upon which defendant relies applies only to crimes committed after its effective date *(People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005]). In any event, the amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the new law’s effective date *(People v Walker,*81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1997: Q2... 100 * .01 6.00 11.00 20.00 30.00 21.00 9.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q2... 100 * .01 3.00 14.00 31.00 30.00 14.00 7.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q2... 100 .01 4.00 4.00 12.00 37.00 30.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 * * 2000: Q2... 100 .01 .01 .01 4.00 19.00 36.00 27.00 11.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2001: Q2... 100 .01 3.00 8.00 29.00 31.00 22.00 5.00 2.00 .39 .07 .03 .01 * * 2002: Q2... 100 23.24 22.45 17.77 22.77 10.15 2.75 .77 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2003: Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * * 2004: Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * * 2005: Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * * 2006: Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * * 2007: Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * * 2008: Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * * 2005: Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 42.96 22.94 21.11 8.58 2.62 1.52 * * * * * * * *  Q4... 100 52.53 18.20 16.11 8.68 3.71 .65 * * * * * * * * 2009: Q1... 100 39.51 21.84 28.68 5.44 3.88 * * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 47.26 23.81 20.08 5.22 2.50 .67 * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Annual Report of The Dress Barn Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Armand Correia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
intended to be used for any other purpose.




/S/ ARMAND CORREIA
Armand Correia
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
October 13 , 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Vincent Schonath

v. Civil No. 08-cv-448-PB

NH Supreme Court,

Associate Justice, et al

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $7.00 is due no later than

December 17, 2008. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the

Lakes Region Facility when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 17, 2008

cc: Vincent Schonath

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Lakes Region Facility, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00448-PB Document 7 Filed 11/17/08 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.50


NATIONAL CITY                                               NATIONAL CITY BANK
                                                            MIRACLE MILE OFFICE
                                                            655 21st Street
                                                            Vero Beach, FL 32960

                                December 7, 2007

Ms. Maria F. Caldarone
Homes by Calton, LLC
2050 40th Avenue #1
Vero Beach, Florida 32960

                    RE:   BUILDER LINE OF CREDIT REVISED COMMITMENT

Dear Ms. Caldarone:

We have completed our review and have approved the following modifications:

         >>       A decrease of the maximum availability of the line of credit
                  from $4,790,000.00 to $2,789,670.00.
         >>       Next review date July 1, 2008.
         >>       $13,948.35 renewal fee is due at signing.

All terms, conditions, and covenants of the Security Instruments, and of the
Note and any Advance Notes evidencing the indebtedness secured thereby, and of
the original Commitment Letter, along with all subsequently issued commitment
letters, shall remain in full force and effect.

Thank you for your continued business, and please call on us if you have any
questions or additional banking needs.


                             Very truly yours,
                             NATIONAL CITY BANK


                             By: /s/ Alex Nall
                                 -------------------------
                                 Alex Nall, Vice President
                                 Relationship Manager