alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O

. PD

- 0287

- 15

T O THE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS

No. 01

- 13

- 01028

- CR

L ESLE M ARKLE

Appeal from Cause Number 1865367

From the County Criminal Court No. 12

Harris County

vs.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS

A PP ELLANT ’ S FINAL M OTION FOR E XTENSION

F ILED C ONCURRENTLY WITH PDR

T O T HE H ONORABLE J UDGES O F T HE C OURT O F C RIMINAL A PPEALS :

C OMES N OW

, L ESLE M ARKLE

, and files this Motion to Extend Time to File PDR , and

in support thereof, would respectfully show the Court the following:

I.

The First Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment in an opinion styled

Markle v. State, 01

- 13

- 01028

- CR, 2015 WL 505194 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.]

Feb. 5, 2015, no. pet. One other motion for extension has been granted

.

II.

In compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.2(c), this motion for

extension is timely filed within 15 days of the original deadline for the PDR, which

was April 8 , 2015

. Appellant requests this extension due to the fact that counsel for

Appell ant has recently been ill for a protracted period of time, along with counsel ’ s husband and child as well. This has interrupted counsel ’ s work schedule as she has

additionally been engaged in work in the Harris County Public Defender’s Office on

many cases, including the following:

 Lenin Lopez, 01

- 13

- 01079

- CR, revers ed and set for retrial in cause #1403196

 Vincent William, #1420283 PD-0287-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/22/2015 4:32:24 PM

Accepted 4/23/2015 10:13:52 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK Darryle Robertson, 14

- 15

- 00132

- CR

 Rodney Robins, 01

- 14

- 00582

- CR

 Craig Beal, 01

- 12

- 00896

- CR

 Abner Washington, 01

- 14

- 00885

- CR

 Forest Penton, 14

- 14

- 00406

- CR

 Leonard Storemski, 14

- 14

- 00920

- CR

 F elix Irizarry, 14

- 14

- 00827

- CR

 Eddie Aldape, 14

- 14

- 00996

- CR

 Counsel has been researching and writing for several trial cases assigned to the

Public Defender’s Office Trial Division.

III.

Appellee ’s attorney requests this extension of 14 days

, which is necessary so that the

PDR can be thoro ughly written and timely filed. This motion is not made for the

purpose of delay.

PRAYER

W HEREFORE

, P REMISES C ONSIDERED

, Appellee prays that this Honorable Court

grants this requested extensi on of time to file the PDR in the above cause and extend

the time for filing to April 22 , 2015 , the date of e

- fili ng

, or whatever date the filing is

officiated.

Respectfully submitted,

A LEXANDER B UNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

S ARAH V. W OOD

Assistant Public Defender

Harris County, Texas

Texas Bar Number 240488981201 Franklin, 13 th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

713.368.0016 (phone)

713.368.9278 (fax)

Sarah.Wood@pdo.hctx.net

C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

By my signature below, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of t h e above and

foregoing Appellant ’s Final Motion to Extend Time to File PDR has been served via

the efile service on the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ Sarah V. Wood

Sarah V. Wood
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01731-CMA-MJW

AMANDA SULLIVAN, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of

Kiera Sullivan, a minor, deceased, 

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DELTA ENTERPRISE, CORP.,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Delta Enterprise, Corp.’s Motion for

Protective Order Re: Plaintiff’s Third Amended Notices of Videotaped Depositions

(docket no. 47) is DENIED AS MOOT. The relief sought in the subject motion (docket

no. 47) requests an Order from this court preventing Plaintiff from taking the depositions

of Sam Shamie and Steve Anzaroot on July 9 and 10, 2012. These dates have come

and gone. Moreover, Defendant Delta Enterprise, Corp. seeks attorney fees and costs

for preparing the subject motion (docket no. 47). I find under these circumstances,

after reviewing the subject motion (docket no. 47) and the response (docket no. 56),

that an award of expenses would be unjust. 

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall forthwith meet, confer, and clear dates

and times for the depositions of Sam Shamie and Steve Anzaroot. These depositons

shall be completed prior to the discovery cut-off date [November 19, 2012] set by this

court. See docket no. 34. The parties shall further comply fully with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30

and D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.1 and 30.3 in setting and taking of the depositions of Sam

Shamie and Steve Anzaroot. The parties shall comply fully with Fed. R. Civ. P 30 and 

D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.1 and 30.3 in all other depositions that need to be set and taken 

in this case. The parties are reminded that the discovery rules were intended to be

used in the discovery process without court intervention. 

Date: July 30, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-01731-CMA-MJW Document 57 Filed 07/30/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 INTERWEST MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 USC 1350) The undersigned, Arch B. Gilbert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
InterWest Medical Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys current report on Form 10-K
(the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:  
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 13th day
of January 2005. /s/ Arch B. GilbertArch B. GilbertPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00084-CR

TRAY DEMOND GAMBLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1525624D)

May 9, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Order entered July 30, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00029
- CR
JORGE LUIS ALEJANDRO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F13
- 58523
- L



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appell ant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This app eal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       of
                            Periodic Financial Report
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
                                  Section 1350

I, Lucie Brun, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of
Campbell Resources Inc., hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 20-F for
the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Campbell
Resources Inc.

Date: May 19, 2004.

                               By: (s) Lucie Brun
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Lucie Brun
                                   Executive Vice President and Chief
                                   Administrative Officer (Principal Financial
                                   and Principal Accounting Officer)

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other
purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2187 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2187

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to make receipts collected from 
    mineral leasing activities on certain naval oil shale reserves 
  available to cover environmental restoration, waste management, and 
   environmental compliance costs incurred by the United States with 
                        respect to the reserves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF RECEIPTS FROM MINERAL LEASING ACTIVITIES ON CERTAIN 
              NAVAL OIL SHALE RESERVES.

    Section 7439 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (f)(1), by striking the second sentence; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Use of Receipts.--(1) The Secretary of the Interior may use, 
without further appropriation, not more than $1,500,000 of the moneys 
covered into the Treasury under subsection (f)(1) to cover the cost of 
any additional analysis, site characterization, and geotechnical 
studies deemed necessary by the Secretary to support environmental 
restoration, waste management, or environmental compliance with respect 
to Oil Shale Reserve Numbered 3. Upon the completion of such studies, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a report 
containing--
            ``(A) the results and conclusions of such studies; and
            ``(B) an estimate of the total cost of the Secretary's 
        preferred alternative to address environmental restoration, 
        waste management, and environmental compliance needs at Oil 
        Shale Reserve Numbered 3.
    ``(2) If the cost estimate required by paragraph (1)(B) does not 
exceed the total of the moneys covered into the Treasury under 
subsection (f)(1) and remaining available for obligation as of the date 
of submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the 
Interior may access such moneys, beginning 60 days after submission of 
the report and without further appropriation, to cover the costs of 
implementing the preferred alternative to address environmental 
restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance needs at 
Oil Shale Reserve Numbered 3. If the cost estimate exceeds such 
available moneys, the Secretary of the Interior may only access such 
moneys as authorized by subsequent Act of Congress.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 18, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          0
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: October 04, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7580

ROBERT LAWRENCE TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-1189)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lawrence Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lawrence Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Director, Virginia Dep’t

of Corrections, No. CA-00-1189 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000). We deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending March 3, 2018FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE                                                                                            InvestmentThe Bank of New York Mellon, New York, New York, to make an investment, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE                                                                                            InvestmentThe Bank of New York Mellon, New York, New York, to make an investment pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE                                                                                            InvestmentThe Bank of New York Mellon, New York, New York, to make an investment pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableCITIBANK, N.A.                                                                                                          InvestmentNotice by Citibank N.A., Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Citibank Overseas Investment Corporation, New Castle Delaware, to make additional investment, pursuant to Section 211.9(f) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                                                               InvestmentJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, Columbus, Ohio and J.P Morgan International Finance Limited, Newark, Delaware, provide prior notice to invest in subsidiaries, pursuant to Section 211.9 of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 113




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2005 containing financial statements (the periodic report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
    
    the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.
 /s/ Robert E. James, Jr.Name: Robert E. James, Jr.Title: President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 14, 2006
 114
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 947
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               496428
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              2930
<OTHER-SE>                                        15997741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           947
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    689215
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   55962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (745177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (745177)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (1600000)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (2345177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.17)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 

WR-67,454-09 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

Transmitted 6/24/2015 5:35:47 PM 

Accepted 6/25/2015 8:16:37 AM 

ABEL ACOSTA 

CLERK 

AUSTIN, TEXAS RECEIVED 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

6/25/2015 

ABELACOSTA,CLERK 

EX PARTE § 

§ 

§ 

§ 

CANDELARIO HOLGUIN, JR. § 

NOS. WR-67,454-07 

WR-67,454-08 

WR-67 ,454-09 

AGREED MOTION TO RETURN 

APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS 

TO DISTRICT COURT 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

NOW COMES CANDELARIO HOLGUIN, JR., Applicant, and respectfully 

asks this Court to return the above styled and numbered applications for writs of 

habeas corpus to the District Court for an evidentiary hearing and would show the 

Court the following: 

I. 

The writ applications filed by Candelario Holguin, Jr. in the Criminal District 

Court of Dallas County were received by this Court on June 22, 2015. They were 

assigned numbers WR-67,454-07, WR-67,454-08, and WR-67,454-09. 

II. 

An evidentiary hearing is scheduled in the trial court on Applicant's writ 

Agreed Motion to Return Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus to District coJELBCmomc 
........ " 

applications for September 18, 2015. This is the earliest date available for the hearing 

based on the availability of the witnesses necessary to resolve the issues in 

Applicant's writ applications. 

III. 

An evidentiary hearing is necessary to properly resolve the issues raised in the 

writ applications: These writ applications should therefore be returned to the trial 

court for further factual development at the evidentiary hearing on September 18, 

2015. 

FOR THE ABOVE REASONS, Applicant respectfully asks that this agreed 

motion be granted. 

AGREED: 

/s/ Laura Coats 

Laura Coats 

Assistant District Attorney 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Robert N. Udashen 

ROBERT N. UDASHEN, P.C. 

Bar Card No. 20369600 

SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON ' 

2311 Cedar Springs Road 

Suite 250 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

214-468-8100 

214-468-8104 (fax) 

Attorney for Applicant 

Agreed Motion to Return Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus to District Court- Page 2 

j