alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,884,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,780,398
<PP&E>                                      32,370,981
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,101,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,049,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,309,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,049,995
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,025,606
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,651,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,449,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                184,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            184,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   184,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Alan B. Levin
 Alan B. Levin
 Chief Financial Officer
 August 6, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7734

DARRELL ANTONIO GUMBS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee,

and HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of the B.O.P. in his individual and official capacity; Y. APONTE, AHSA at FCC Petersburg - Low in both her individual and official capacity; ELIZABETH PANAGUITON, P/A at FCC Petersburg - Low in both her individual and official capacity; K. LAYBOURN, FCC Petersburg-Low in both her individual and official capacity; V. ADAMS, Warden at FCC Petersburg in both her individual and official capacity; KIM WHITE, Regional Director of the Eastern District in both her individual and official capacity; HARRELL WATTS, Administrative Remedy Coordinator of the Bureau of Prisons Central Office (for 6/8/2005 - name unknown) in both his/her individual and official capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00148-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Antonio Gumbs, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorn ey, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM: Darrell Antonio Gumbs appeals the district court’s final order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. While the magistrate judge advised Gumbs that failure to timely file specific written objections to the report would result in waiver of the right to appeal from the district court’s judgment, Gumbs failed to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Therefore, Gumbs waived appellate review of his

claims. See United States v. Midgette , 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 127 S. Ct. 3032 (2007). Moreover, Gumbs’ claims of attorney error provide no basis for relief.

See Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986) (holding that there is no right to effective assistance of counsel in civil cases). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH

DWAYNE A. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO,

DAVE WELCHER, 

ERWIN MOZER, M.D., and

NURSE JANE DOE, Individually,

Defendants.

AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Brimmer, J.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b),

United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is designated to conduct

proceedings in this civil action as follows:

(X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a

scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2.

(X) Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for

compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or

modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause.

() Convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as

may facilitate resolution of this case.

(X) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other nondispositive motions.

(X) Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed

findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions.

(X) Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order.

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 13 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to

proceed according to the designations marked (X) above.

Dated December 2, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Philip A. Brimmer 

Philip A. Brimmer

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 13 Filed 12/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02007
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02008
          1
          0
          0
          2
          32009
          2
          3
          2
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 18, 2009
#### Wagner Dorvil, Appellant, v Hilton Hotels Corp. et al., Respondents.

[807 NYS2d 369]

*443Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered on or about November 8, 2004, which granted the motion of defendants Hilton Hotels Corp. and Stewart Yule for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No prima facie case of retaliation under the state Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [1] [e]) was set forth. The in-house investigation conducted by defendant Hilton did not relate to conduct prohibited under the Human Rights Law and was not a “proceeding” for purposes of Executive Law § 296 (1) (e) *(see Unotti v American Broadcasting Cos.,*273 AD2d 68 [2000]). Further, there was no proof that defendants Hilton and Yule were actually engaged in age discrimination or that the statement which plaintiff refused to sign was the product of discriminatory animus.

For the same reasons, plaintiffs claims against Yule individually were properly dismissed. We note as well that there was no evidence raising a triable issue as to whether Yule aided and abetted forbidden discriminatory conduct *(see*Executive Law § 296 [6]). Nor was there evidence that Yule had an ownership interest in the hotel at which plaintiff was employed or authority to make personnel decisions *(see Patrowich v Chemical Bank,*63 NY2d 541 [1984]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

t0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

148243

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148243

COA: 311772

Marquette CC: 11

- 049971

- FH

MICHAEL ALDEN WALLINE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John L. Coleman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|   | 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  |   |   |                                                                                                                                          |
|--|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   |   | /s/ JOHN L. COLEMAN   **John L. Coleman, President and C.E.O.****(Principal Executive Officer)**
Date: November 12,2002
  |
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cragar
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal Quarter ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard P. Franke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2003
                                                /s/   Richard P. Franke
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard P. Franke
                                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2001: Q2... 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.1 7.8 9.2 8.9 8.6 7.9  Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1  Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Q4... 5.5 5.5 5.2 6.0 5.5 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 5.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
|   |
|--------|

| 1.     | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Moneylogix Group, Inc. |

| Date: May 16, 2011                  |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| MONEYLOGIX GROUP, INC.              |
|                                |
| By: /s/ Binnay Sethi                |
| Binnay SethiChief Financial Officer |
|                                |

----
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT -- 11

MILACRON INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF PER-SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE AMOUNTS)                       1999       1998       1997
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>        <C>
Net earnings................................................  $70,080    $41,532    $80,589
Less preferred dividends....................................     (240)      (240)      (240)
                                                              -------    -------    -------
  Net earnings available to common shareholders.............  $69,840    $41,292    $80,349
                                                              =======    =======    =======
Basic earnings per share
  Weighted-average common shares outstanding................   36,847     38,875     39,583
                                                              =======    =======    =======
    Per share amount........................................  $  1.90    $  1.06    $  2.03
                                                              =======    =======    =======
Diluted earnings per share
  Weighted-average common shares outstanding................   36,847     38,875     39,583
  Add dilutive effect of stock options and restricted shares
    based on treasury stock method..........................      202        366        373
                                                              -------    -------    -------
    Total...................................................   37,049     39,241     39,956
                                                              =======    =======    =======
      Per share amount......................................  $  1.89    $  1.05    $  2.01
                                                              =======    =======    =======

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>