alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael Lavette Daniels, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00102

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 45,187

- B ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Michael Lavette Daniels, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 1 , 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

D ebra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-72-01-SM

Osuyuwamen Ojo

O R D E R

Defendant Ojo’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and trial is

granted (document 10). Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2007 trial

period. Defendant Ojo shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

July 2, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: July 25, 2007 at 4:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: August 7, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00072-SM Document 11 Filed 06/28/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 28, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Terry Ollia, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00072-SM Document 11 Filed 06/28/07 Page 2 of 2
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2006: Q2... 16 55 29 15 78 7 13 80 7 15 60 25 10 49 

 Q3... 12 58 30 17 71 11 15 77 9 11 60 28 8 45  Q4... 18 47 35 27 66 7 15 78 7 9 53 38 17 40 2007: Q1... 10 51 38 23 68 8 13 79 8 5 51 45 9 42  Q2... 10 59 30 23 71 6 12 79 8 8 48 44 11 55  Q3... 15 50 35 16 72 12 9 86 5 5 58 37 13 46  Q4... 16 42 41 27 67 6 9 80 11 5 62 33 18 32 2008: Q1... 20 46 34 41 55 4 17 77 6 8 59 33 19 35  Q2... 26 49 25 45 52 3 22 72 6 10 56 34 26 36 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2006: Q2... 25 61 14 35 61 4 11 82 2 13 77 5 20 58 

 Q3... 23 63 14 21 67 12 11 80 4 11 85 5 13 59  Q4... 14 66 20 26 63 11 10 80 5 10 85 6 11 66 2007: Q1... 13 64 24 18 72 10 12 77 5 12 81 7 7 65  Q2... 8 66 26 16 74 10 17 75 2 13 80 7 7 69  Q3... 10 72 18 15 75 10 11 80 3 8 75 18 7 69  Q4... 11 63 26 16 71 13 7 90 3 8 76 16 8 64 2008: Q1... 22 57 21 29 65 6 11 86 4 17 76 7 19 55  Q2... 21 56 23 40 53 8 13 85 2 8 78 14 15 51 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2006: Q2... 16 74 11 0 87 13 21 79 0 13 81 6 21 68 

 Q3... 47 53 0 29 64 7 31 69 0 31 69 0 42 58  Q4... 25 70 5 18 76 6 24 76 0 16 68 16 25 70 2007: Q1... 26 58 16 20 67 13 21 64 14 44 50 6 21 58  Q2... 12 88 0 6 94 0 13 88 0 11 78 11 11 84  Q3... 36 64 0 18 82 0 20 80 0 8 58 33 21 71  Q4... 39 56 6 33 67 0 31 69 0 24 76 0 17 61 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.  Q2... 25 56 19 20 73 7 21 71 7 19 56 25 13 75  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v . Civil No. 08-cv-486-JD

Christina O'Brien

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated April 24, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

July 19, 2009 /s/.Ioseph A. DiClerico. Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00486-JD Document 19 Filed 07/19/09 Page 1 of 1
1

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. 

Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

2 “[#3]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific

paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention

throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02177-REB-BNB

CODY L. POTTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITIFINANCIAL, INC., and

PACIFICARE OF COLORADO, INC., jointly and severally,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER1

The matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion For Leave To File

Amended Motion To Dismiss and For Extension of Deadline To File Responsive

Pleading [#36]2 filed December 12, 2011. The motion is GRANTED, and the

Defendants’ Amended Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)6) [#36-

1] is accepted for filing. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadlines for filing of responsive pleadings

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4) shall run from the date of this minute order.

Dated: December 13, 2011

Case 1:11-cv-02177-REB-BNB Document 37 Filed 12/13/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Desmond, et al.

v. Case No. 06-cv-264-PB

Notinger, et al.

O R D E R

The case shall be statistically closed until further order

of the court. The parties shall jointly move to reopen or

otherwise inform the court of the disposition of the case upon

the conclusion of pending matters in the Bankruptcy Court. Until

then, a joint status report shall be filed every 90 days. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 11, 2007

cc: William S. Gannon, Esq.

Deborah Ann Notinger, Esq.

William B. Pribis, Esq.

US Bankruptcy Court-NH Clerk

Geraldine L. Karonis, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00264-PB Document 26 Filed 08/11/07 Page 1 of 1
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 3828 Lower Tribunal No. 21CF

- 2499AOS

_____________________________
Z ENEN R OGELIO A LICEA M ALDONADO ,

Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County

.

Keith A. Carsten , Judge.

J u ly 2, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

.
TRAVER
, C

. J. , and STARGEL and WOZNIAK, JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Susan M. Shanahan , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FIN AL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-198-01-SM

David Bettoney

O R D E R

Defendant appeared for a bail revocation hearing pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3148. 

He stipulated to the violation which was using a computer in

the Gilford Public Library. The Third Party Custodian is no

longer willing to act as such. The violation was blatant since

defendant’s wife had told him that she would pay bills on line

and he nevertheless did it himself. He also used a computer in

the Laconia Public Library. The violations are only days after

bail was set. I find that the defendant is unlikely to abide by

any condition or combination of conditions. The conditions of

release are revoked.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending trial. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

Case 1:07-cr-00198-SM Document 9 Filed 10/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 18, 2007 

cc: Michael J. Iacopino, Esq.

 Helen W. Fitzgibbon, Esq.

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00198-SM Document 9 Filed 10/18/07 Page 2 of 2
**
Exhibit 35.1 

Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC 

**NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

The undersigned, Kevin J. Cullum, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE COMPANY LLC, a Delaware limited liabilitycompany (successor by conversion to Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such officer, as follows: 

(1) The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2018 (as amended, the“Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Company LLC II (successor by conversion to Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II), as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2018-C Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and 

(2) To the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forpublicly-issued asset-backed securities. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2022. 

 

/s/ Kevin J. Cullum

Kevin J. Cullum

President and Chief Executive Officer

 
20 

**
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934AND 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with theQuarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the“Report”), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that: 

(1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange           Act of 1934; and

(2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial           condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael W. Levin             Michael W. LevinChief Executive OfficerDate:  February 14, 2005

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1997: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 10.00 31.00 33.00 17.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q1... 100 * .01 13.00 4.00 23.00 32.00 22.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q1... 100 .01 4.00 17.00 17.00 29.00 23.00 9.00 2.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * * 2005: Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 42.96 22.94 21.11 8.58 2.62 1.52 * * * * * * * *  Q4... 100 52.53 18.20 16.11 8.68 3.71 .65 * * * * * * * * 2009: Q1... 100 39.51 21.84 28.68 5.44 3.88 * * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the squarter.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22401]



[[Page 55138]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,409]


Delphi Corporation, Powertrain Operations, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Trison Business Solutions, Inc. and Bartech, 
Rochester, NY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on June 8, 2007, applicable to workers of Delphi 
Corporation, Powertrain Operations, Rochester, New York. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2007 (72 FR 34482).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of fuel systems and emission components; specifically 
cruse control housings, integrated air fuel modules, canisters, linear 
exhaust gas recyclers throttle bodies and pressure regulators.
    New information shows that workers leased from Trison Business 
Solutions, Inc. and Bartech were employed on-site at the Rochester, New 
York location of Delphi Corporation, Powertrain Operations. The 
Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under 
the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include leased workers from Trison Business Solutions, 
Inc. and Bartech working on-site at the Powertrain Operation, 
Rochester, New York location of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,409 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Delphi Corporation, Powertrain Operations, 
including on-site leased workers from Trison Business Solutions, 
Inc. and Bartech, Rochester, New York, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after April 24, 2006, 
through June 8, 2009, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of September 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-22401 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In re Tyco International, Ltd.

Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 1335) CASE NO. 02-md-1335-B

 Teacher Retirement System

 of Texas, et al. v. 

 Tyco Int’l Ltd., et al. Civil No. 08-cv-1336-PB

 Nuveen Balanced Mun. & Stock

 Fund, et al. v.

 Tyco Int’l Ltd., et al. Civil No. 08-cv-1338-PB

 Blackrock Global Allocation

 Fund, Inc., et al. v. 

 Tyco Int’l Ltd., et al. Civil No. 08-cv-1339-PB

 State Treasurer of the State

 of Michigan, et al. v.

 Tyco Int’l Ltd., et al. Civil No. 08-cv-1340-PB

 Public Employees’ Retirement

 Assoc. of Colorado v.

 Dennis Kozlowski and Mark Swartz Civil No. 08-cv-1341-PB

SUGGESTION OF REMAND

Pretrial proceedings on common matters have been

substantially completed in the above-referenced cases, Civil

Action Nos. 08-cv-1336-PB; 08-cv-1338-PB; 08-cv-1339-PB; 08-cv1340-PB and 08-cv-1341-PB. The parties in these cases are in

agreement that they should be remanded to the court where they

were originally filed, and the court has determined that a remand

order will best serve the expeditious resolution of these cases. 

Accordingly, the court recommends that the Judicial Panel on

Case 1:08-cv-01341-PB Document 19 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
Multidistrict Litigation remand the above-referenced cases to the

courts in which they were originally filed. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 1, 2010

cc: Counsel of Record 

Case 1:08-cv-01341-PB Document 19 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
#### William Wayne ROARK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden SMITH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6558.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided Aug. 11, 2003.

William Wayne Roark, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

William Wayne Roark, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. According*241ly, we affirm because, as noted by the district court, Roark failed to demonstrate that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) is an inadequate or ineffective remedy. *See In re Vial,*115 F.Sd 1192, 1194 n. 5 (4th Cir.1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00585-CR

Tresa Denise Byrd, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-06-203669, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Tresa Byrd seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for forgery. The trial court has

certified that this is a plea bargain case and Byrd has no right of appeal. The appeal is dismissed.

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 15, 2007

Do Not Publish
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, February 7-1Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 713,728 27,154 47,453 59,134 97,981 136,92Number of loans 15,337 7,488 3,126 1,709 1,463 94Weighted average maturity (months)1 19.54 8.30 11.42 15.33 19.50 22.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.45 1.93 3.88 5.13 5.33 6.0

Weighted average risk rating3 3.06 3.22 3.17 3.11 2.92 3.0

Weighted average interest rate4 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Standard error5 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 25th percentile .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other livestock .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other current operating expenses7 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

 Farm machinery and equipment .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Farm real estate .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0 Other8 .01 .01 .01 .01 .01 .0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 83.57 82.48 73.20 75.20 75.94 80.9 Under commitment 83.06 91.18 83.26 79.03 80.57 77.7 Callable 25.23 24.04 29.89 27.63 30.51 23.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.31 5.27 6.80 6.94 11.51 14.7 Other livestock 7.13 5.21 5.78 8.64 9.94 5.7 Other current operating expenses7 55.58 74.92 69.04 59.09 53.03 55.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 3.54 3.02 6.57 11.01 7.30 2.6 Farm real estate 7.33 1.61 .77 2.49 6.57 4.8 Other8 17.09 9.97 11.04 11.82 11.64 16.1

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 11.09 4.31 5.27 6.35 9.61 10.8 Other 83.01 86.78 88.21 90.24 86.17 87.2 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.