alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Text Data Files The files containing data from 1986 to present are updated each month as part of the G.17 release process.
The historical data, grouped by the table in which they appear in the G.17 release, are available in text files. 
The format for each line in the files consists of an industry code, 
a year, and 12 months of data (to four decimal places) when available.  The data have 
various start dates; the earliest is 1919. Data files for: Tables 1, 2 and 10 Table 3 Table 6 Tables 7 and 8 Table 9 Relative Importance Weights Discontinued Data
 Current and Historical Data: All Tables Industrial Production, Capacity Utilization, Capacity, Gross Value of Products, and Diffusion Indexes  Data for all tables (to December 2016):Seasonally Adjusted and Not Seasonally Adjusted (large file with ALL series from the release)
Documentation: These files contain descriptions for all the series along with the series codes that represent them in the data files:


Table 1: Industrial Production:  Market and Industry Group Summary
Table 2: Industrial Production:  Special Aggregates and Selected Detail
Table 3: Motor Vehicle Assemblies
Table 6: Diffusion Indexes of Industrial Production 
Tables 7 and 8: Capacity Utilization and Industrial Capacity
Table 9:  Industrial Production: Gross Value of Products
Table 10:  Gross-Value-Weighted Industrial Production: Stage-of-Process Groups

Tables from the G.17 Supplement:
  Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E:  Industry Subtotals and Individual Series
      Tables 2 and 3:  Capacity Utilization and Industrial Capacity
Data files for: 
Tables 1, 2 and 10 | 
Table 3 |
Table 6 | 
Tables 7 and 8 |  
Table 9 | 
All Tables |
Relative Importance Weights |
Discontinued Data

Return to top




Last update: January 18, 2017

Home | Economic research and data 
          
Accessibility
  Contact Us
  Disclaimer
  Leaving the BoardLinking Policy
  FOIA
PDF Reader
  Leaving the Board
#### John Joseph, Also Known as George Joseph, Appellant, v Insureco, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[809 NYS2d 518]

In a hybrid action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, and a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, to compel the New York State Superintendent of Insurance to require certain insurance companies to settle the plaintiffs insurance claim arising from water damage *765to his property, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated August 16, 2004, which granted that branch of the cross motion of Insureco, Inc., St. Paul Insurance Company, sued herein as St. Paul Property and Liability Insurance, and United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, sued herein as United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., which was to dismiss the claims insofar as asserted against them as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), granted that branch of the cross motion of the New York State Insurance Department and the New York State Superintendent of Insurance which was to dismiss the claims insofar as asserted against them as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), and dismissed the proceeding insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Pursuant to the limitations provisions contained in the insurance policy issued to the plaintiff and the endorsement, his claim against Insureco, Inc., St. Paul Insurance Company, sued herein as St. Paul Property and Liability Insurance, and United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, sued herein as United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., was properly dismissed as time-barred. Parties to a contract may agree to limit the period of time within which an action must be commenced to a shorter period than that provided by the applicable statute of limitations *(see*CPLR 201; *Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Saltaire v Zagata,*280 AD2d 547 [2001]). The claims asserted against the New York State Insurance Department and the New York State Superintendent of Insurance were likewise time-barred *(see*CPLR 217).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Banko, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-00095-JL

Town of Alton, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

May 7, 2008 at 2:30 p.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:08-cv-00095-JL Document 7 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

April 25, 2008

cc: Richard J. Lehmann, Esq.

Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.

Charles P. Bauer, Esq.

Brian J. S. Cullen, Esq.

William G. Scott, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00095-JL Document 7 Filed 04/25/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.89  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
 AUTOBYTEL INC.
 2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AND OPTION PLAN
 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment No. 1”), dated as of May 1, 2009, to the Autobytel Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Autobytel Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan.
 
 Effective as of the date hereof, the Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.4(d)(ii) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
  “(ii) Options shall be exercisable in full or in such equal or unequal installments as the Administrator shall determine; provided that if a Participant does not purchase all of the Shares which the Participant is entitled to purchase on a certain date or within an established installment period, the Participant’s right to
purchase any unpurchased Shares shall continue during the Award Term (taking into account any early termination of such Award Term which may be provided for under this Plan).”
 
 Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as in existence on the date hereof, and any reference to the Plan shall mean the Plan as amended hereby.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
  AUTOBYTEL INC.
 
 
 By: /s/ Glenn E. Fuller
 Glenn E. Fuller
 Its: Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and
 Administrative Officer and Secretary
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2067

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain deductions of school bus owner-operators shall be allowable in computing

adjusted gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 2001

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that certain deductions of school bus owner-operators

shall be allowable in computing adjusted gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Bus Driver Tax

5 Fairness Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2067 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTIONS OF SCHOOL BUS OWNER-OPERATORS

2 ALLOWABLE IN COMPUTING ADJUSTED

3 GROSS INCOME.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

6 trade and business deductions of employees) is amended

7 by adding at the end thereof the following new subpara8 graph:

9 ‘‘(D) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF SCHOOL BUS

10 OWNER-OPERATORS.—The deductions allowed

11 by part VI (section 161 and following) which

12 consist of expenses paid or incurred by the tax13 payer in connection with the performance by

14 the taxpayer of services as an employee while

15 driving a school bus (as defined in section

16 4221(d)(7)(C)) owned by the employee.’’

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

19 December 31, 2001.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

                 Company                             State of Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calton Homes of Florida, Inc.                               Florida
Calton Homes of Chicago, Inc.                               Illinois
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.                          Pennsylvania
Calton Homes of Pennsylvania at Pennway, Inc.               Pennsylvania
Calton Homes of California, Inc.                            California
Calton Lindenwood Corporation                               California
Calton Manzanita Corporation                                California
Calton Tamarack Corporation                                 California
Calton California Equity Corporation                        California
Calton General, Inc.                                        New Jersey
Calton Homes Finance, Inc.                                  New Jersey
Calton Homes Finance II, Inc.                               New Jersey
Haddon Group of Virginia, Inc.                              New Jersey
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,000 $24,000 $49,000 $99,000 $249,000 

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 369,523 34,729 54,772 69,512 72,784 56,41

Number of loans 15,699 8,460 3,734 1,896 1,092 36

Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.95 9.48 13.67 12.76 21.72 35.5

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.83 5.56 7.72 7.15 12.61 5.4

Weighted average risk rating3 2.29 2.35 2.42 2.30 2.13 2.2

Weighted average interest rate4 6.21 7.06 6.81 6.60 6.35 6.1 Standard error5 .19 .10 .07 .13 .17 .3

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.00 7.74 7.63 7.12 6.81 7.0

 25th percentile 5.51 6.16 6.12 6.08 5.90 5.2

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.29 6.53 6.60 7.13 6.09 6.0

 Other livestock 6.95 7.65 7.50 6.54 7.29 6.9

 Other current operating expenses7 5.88 7.07 6.64 6.36 6.06 6.3

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.03 7.48 6.98 6.71 6.68 8.0

 Farm real estate 6.11 6.34 7.19 5.54 6.09 5.2

 Other8 5.63 5.98 6.61 6.39 5.65 4.5

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 42.63 40.83 42.93 43.13 30.27 51.8

 Under commitment 44.64 54.03 49.95 59.01 35.88 58.4

 Callable 27.66 13.37 15.98 22.20 11.61 30.5

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 17.54 3.91 7.02 19.71 21.14 46.2

 Other livestock 14.30 5.62 15.34 35.02 16.76 10.5

 Other current operating expenses7 47.51 76.17 61.17 33.21 34.35 18.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.94 9.00 10.33 8.59 13.79 8.0

 Farm real estate 9.23 .99 1.75 .93 9.69 9.4

 Other8 3.48 4.32 4.39 2.54 4.26 7.2

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.57 9.66 5.49 5.55 14.16 23.9

 Other 80.34 83.79 87.34 89.89 85.84 76.0

 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
|   | 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                 |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | /s/ Richard J. Lampen                |   |
|   |   | Richard J. Lampen                    |   |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 09-cr-9-01-SM

Joseph Delgado

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 22) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2009 trial period. Defendant

shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than July 27, 2009. On the filing

of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM 

Case 1:09-cr-00009-PB Document 23 Filed 07/17/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: September 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

July 17, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00009-PB Document 23 Filed 07/17/09 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1995

To advance the current timetable for the elimination of out-of-pocket housing

costs for members of the uniformed services entitled to the basic allowance for housing for military housing areas inside the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. SIMMONS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To advance the current timetable for the elimination of outof-pocket housing costs for members of the uniformed

services entitled to the basic allowance for housing for

military housing areas inside the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPEDITED ELIMINATION OF MEMBERS’ OUT4 OF-POCKET HOUSING COSTS.

5 Section 603(b) of the National Defense Authorization

6 Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 37 U.S.C.

7 403 note), as amended by section 605(e) of the Floyd D.

8 Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
2

•HR 1995 IH

1 Year 2001 (as enacted by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat.

2 1654A–148), is further amended—

3 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘of not

4 more than eight years’’ and inserting ‘‘not to extend

5 beyond September 30, 2003’’; and

6 (2) by adding at the end the following new sen7 tence: ‘‘Under the transition plan, the Secretary

8 shall ensure that out-of-pocket housing costs for

9 members of the uniformed services entitled to the

10 basic allowance for housing for military housing

11 areas inside the United States do not exceed 7.5

12 percent of housing costs by the end of fiscal year

13 2002.’’.

Æ
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1993...... 34.28 79.68 23.07 15.25 13.91 111.99 3.71 14.94 46.12 490.33 1994...... 33.91 60.27 27.58 16.29 17.54 123.60 3.72 14.57 46.98 480.70 1995...... 33.77 49.68 26.74 18.46 15.59 93.60 3.73 14.72 44.94 451.25 1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2002: Q1... 33.13 48.19 33.07 25.93 26.71 60.82 3.65 15.01 47.55 237.43  Q2... 23.72 41.55 32.41 18.55 19.26 48.30 3.69 15.06 45.28 216.61  Q3... 28.88 48.00 28.87 21.00 30.85 75.68 3.69 14.83 44.27 329.62  Q4... 31.46 52.06 38.39 22.16 17.78 67.64 3.85 15.19 46.02 333.67 2003: Q1... 35.98 68.86 32.35 27.73 38.74 62.19 3.72 14.88 46.71 249.54  Q2... 24.61 43.91 32.67 18.01 28.73 55.73 3.72 14.67 48.45 241.93  Q3... 27.75 78.05 40.90 17.84 37.37 65.70 3.53 14.83 46.45 319.67  Q4... 35.13 79.92 42.70 23.13 28.16 75.70 4.11 14.85 47.42 313.07 2004: Q1... 45.07 60.59 43.04 35.57 56.02 98.51 3.86 15.02 47.24 341.06  Q2... 32.01 47.74 36.25 21.95 26.77 116.76 3.73 15.17 45.83 358.08  Q3... 33.42 32.56 62.64 18.04 42.06 143.63 3.76 14.56 44.91 359.39  Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Q2... 42.75 70.57 38.44 23.68 78.69 132.29 3.95 14.60 46.31 371.83  Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
H. Res. 845 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 4, 2008. 

Whereas Everglades National Park celebrated its 60th anniversary on December 6, 2007; 

Whereas when President Harry S. Truman dedicated Everglades National Park on December 6, 1947, he stated: 

‘‘Here is land, tranquil in its quiet beauty, serving not as 

the source of water, but as the last receiver of it. To its 

natural abundance we owe the spectacular plant and animal life that distinguishes this place from all others in 

our country’’; 

Whereas Marjory Stoneman Douglas gave the Everglades the 

name ‘‘River of Grass’’ stating, ‘‘There are no other Everglades in the world’’; 

Whereas Everglades National Park has been designated an 

International Biosphere Reserve, a World Heritage Site, 

and a Wetland of International Importance, in recognition of its significance to all the people of the world; 

Whereas the Everglades ecosystem encompasses 3,000,000 

acres of wetlands and is the largest subtropical wilderness in the United States featuring slow-moving freshwater that flows south from Lake Okeechobee through 

sawgrass and tree islands to the mangroves and 

seagrasses of Florida Bay; 
2 

•HRES 845 EH 

Whereas Everglades National Park is home to rare and endangered species, such as the American crocodile, the 

Florida panther, and the West Indian manatee, and more 

than 350 species of birds, including the Great Egret, 

Wood Stork, Swallow-tailed Kite, and Roseate Spoonbill; 

Whereas the Central and South Florida region is an international center for business, agriculture, and tourism, 

with a rapidly growing population of varied ethnic, economic, and social values, all of which are dependent on 

a sustainable framework for the water resources of the 

region to restore the Everglades ecosystem, provide adequate freshwater supplies, and promote a healthy and 

sustainable economy and overall quality of life; 

Whereas Everglades National Park is an essential component 

of a larger ecosystem restoration effort, the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, which has been described as the world’s largest ecosystem restoration 

project; and 

Whereas this restoration effort must succeed in order to restore the natural Everglades ecosystem and ensure that 

the treasures of Everglades National Park can be passed 

on to our children and grandchildren: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of Everglades 

National Park; and 
3 

•HRES 845 EH 

(2) dedicates itself to the success of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit — 23**
**Consent of Experts and Counsel**
**Consent of Independent Auditors**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 33-44423) pertaining to the 1991 Long-term Incentive Plan, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-56403) pertaining to the 1994 Long-termIncentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36743)pertaining to the 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan of Milacron Inc., and in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70733) pertaining to the Milacron Inc.Plan for the Deferral of Director’s Compensation, of our report dated March 14,2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Milacron Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2001.
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
Exhibit 10(a)  




AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 




        This
Agreement is made on this 5th day of February, 2004, between Coeur d’
Alene Mines Corporation (“Coeur”) and James Meek (“Meek”). 




WITNESSETH: 




        Whereas,
the parties hereto entered into an employment agreement on or about March 11, 2003, with
a term commencing on May 31, 2003 and ending on May 31, 2004; and  





        Whereas
the parties desire to extend the term of said employment agreement heretofore made.  





        Now,
Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:  





        1.     It
is hereby agreed between Coeur and Meek that the duration of the employment
          agreement referred to above shall be extended.  





        2.     It
is hereby agreed that the new term of said agreement shall commence on June           1,
2004 and shall expire on May 31, 2005.  





        3.     All
of the other terms and conditions of the employment agreement referred to           above
shall remain unchanged.  





        In
Witness Whereof the parties hereto have set their hands on the date first written above.  





  

	
Coeur d’Alene Mines Corporation 


	
	By:   	/s/  James Meek 
	
		James Meek