alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### W. A. WILKIE, Sometimes Known as Bud Wilkie, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANTLY BROTHERS, Inc., and Bernice Petkere, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 433.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1938.

Julian T. Abeles, of New York City (Edwin P. Kilroe and Charles S. Rosenschein, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Phillips & Nizer, of New York City (Louis Nizer and Arthur B. Krim, both of New York City, and George B. Harris, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On reargument, the decree, 91 F.2d 978, is affirmed.
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1991...... 2.60 .35 .23 1.64 .17 .21 1.66 .51 .32 .10 1992...... 2.69 .35 .25 1.67 .18 .24 1.67 .54 .37 .11 1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2000: Q1... 1.91 .09 .16 1.36 .13 .16 1.07 .43 .27 .14  Q2... 2.27 .12 .19 1.56 .18 .22 1.28 .54 .33 .11  Q3... 1.86 .09 .15 1.29 .12 .20 1.10 .43 .26 .08  Q4... 1.59 .14 .19 .96 .11 .19 .90 .35 .26 .08 

2001: Q1... 1.63 .12 .17 .97 .14 .23 .84 .37 .30 .11 

 Q2... 2.16 .13 .19 1.34 .16 .34 1.23 .49 .32 .12  Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 

2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7249-7250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Meeting of the Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting 
on Thursday, February 28, 2008. Notice of this meeting is given under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.2.
    The meeting agenda includes the following:

[[Page 7250]]

(1) Welcome/Introductions
(2) Environmental Education
(3) Updates on Respect the Resource
(4) General LBL Updates
(5) Board Discussion of Comments Received
    The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and 
may be mailed to: William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between 
The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 42211. Written 
comments must be received at Land Between The Lakes by February 21, 
2008, in order for copies to be provided to the members at the meeting. 
Board members will review written comments received, and at their 
request, oral clarification may be requested at a future meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, February 28, 2008, 9 a.m. 
to 3 p.m., CST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Kentucky Dam Village State 
Resort Park, Gilbertsville, Kentucky, and will be open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Byers, Advisory Board Liaison, 
Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, Kentucky 
42211, 270-924-2002.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Dated: January 22, 2008.
William P. Lisowsky,
Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.
[FR Doc. E8-2292 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Michael Tyrance

Criminal No . 08-cr-104-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

11) filed by defendant is granted .

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : October 21, 200 8

cc : Jessica Brown, Esq .

Terry Ollila, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00104-JD Document 12 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Antonio Sanchez

Criminal No . 08-cr-141-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

15) filed by defendant is granted to September 15, 2009 .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : May 12, 200 9

cc : Lawrence Vogelman, Esq .

Alfred Rubega, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00141-JD Document 16 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1735 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1735

 To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to improve operations of the 
                  Telecommunications Development Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

 Mr. Towns (for himself and Mr. Upton) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to improve operations of the 
                  Telecommunications Development Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telecommunications Development Fund 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPOSITS AND USE OF ACCOUNTS FOR UP-FRONT PAYMENTS.

    Section 309(j)(8)(C) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
309(j)(8)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Deposit and use of auction escrow 
        accounts'' and inserting ``Deposits and use of auction escrow 
        accounts for up-front payments''; and
            (2) by striking ``deposits'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``up-front payments''.

SEC. 3. DEPOSITS AND USE OF ACCOUNTS FOR DOWNPAYMENTS.

    Section 309(j)(8) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
309(j)(8)) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Deposits and use of auction escrow accounts 
                for downpayments.--Any downpayment that the Commission 
                may require any bidder to submit before issuance of a 
                license or permit in a system of competitive bidding 
                pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited in an 
                interest-bearing account at a financial institution 
                designated for purposes of this subsection by the 
                Commission (after consultation with the Secretary of 
                the Treasury). Within 45 days following the issuance of 
                a license or permit--
                            ``(i) the downpayments of successful 
                        bidders shall be paid to the Treasury; and
                            ``(ii) the interest accrued to the account 
                        shall be transferred to the Telecommunications 
                        Development Fund established pursuant to 
                        section 714.''.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Within 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Federal Communications Commission shall make such modifications to its 
rules as are necessary to carry out the amendments made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                   |                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|        |                                        | /s/ Marie              M. May |
|   | Marie                M. May            |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-129-01-SM

Anthony Rabbia, et al

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 22) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the June 2009 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than April 24, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 23 Filed 04/13/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: June 5, 2009 at 4:30 PM 

Jury Selection: June 16, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

April 13, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 23 Filed 04/13/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

City of Rochester,

v. Civil No. 08-cv-263-JL

Rennelda Trust et al.

O R D E R

On September 29, 2008, the court ordered the pro se

defendants to show cause by October 13, 2008 why this action

should not be remanded to Strafford County Superior Court for

lack of federal subject-matter jurisdiction. This court noted

that, while the defendants had removed the case here on the basis

of “federal civil rights claims” asserted in their counterclaim,

that did not create federal subject-matter jurisdiction. See

Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535

U.S. 826, 830-33 (2002). As the Supreme Court explained in that

case, because federal jurisdiction exists by statute over

“actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the

United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 1331, “[i]t follows that a

counterclaim--which appears as part of the defendant’s answer,

not as part of the plaintiff’s complaint--cannot serve as the

basis for ‘arising under’ jurisdiction.” 535 U.S. at 831.

The defendants then asked for an extension of time to

respond to the show cause order; over the plaintiff’s objection,

Case 1:08-cv-00263-JL Document 27 Filed 10/30/08 Page 1 of 2
2

that request was granted in part, giving the defendants until

October 29, 2008, but warning that no further continuances would

be granted. When that date arrived, the defendants nevertheless

asked for another continuance. That motion (document no. 25) is

DENIED. While the court is sympathetic to the defendants’

claimed “health issues,” from now until kingdom come would not

give them enough time to show subject-matter jurisdiction,

because, as just explained, none exists. The defendants point

out in their second motion for an extension that, when one of

them recently brought an unrelated suit in state court against

the City of Rochester, it was removed here, Blaisdell v. City of

Rochester, No. 07-390-JL; but that was done on the basis of the

claims for federal constitutional violations set forth in the

complaint, not in a counterclaim, which makes all the difference. 

This case is REMANDED to the Strafford County Superior Court. 

Any other pending motions are TERMINATED. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 29, 2008

cc: Catherine M. Constanzo, Esq.

Danford J. Wensley, Esq.

George Blaisdell, Esq.

Clay Phalen, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00263-JL Document 27 Filed 10/30/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,796
<PP&E>                                             784
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,745
<COMMON>                                         6,765
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,716
<SALES>                                         11,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,115
<CGS>                                            8,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                       471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,718
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-216-PB

Linda Lopez

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 6, 2008 trial in the above case to allow time to finalize a

plea agreement. The government does not object to a continuance

of the trial date. 

Accordingly, for the above reasons, the court will continue

the trial from May 6, 2008 to June 3, 2008. In agreeing to

continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 5, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Kenneth Glidden, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 31 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 1
#### CAMPBELL & CO. v. TEXAS & P. RY. CO.

No. 4724.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

June 29, 1934.

For former opinion, see 152 So. 351.

Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Freyer, of Shreveport, for appellant

Henry W. Bethard, Jr., of Coushatta, for appellee.

*787TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The pleadings, facts, and issues in this case, and the law applicable thereto, are fully analyzed and discussed in our original opinion. 152 So. 351. The only question presented and disposed of by us, on which we felt any uncertainty as to the correctness of our conclusions thereon, was that of the value of the seven head of cattle for whose death defendant was held responsible. The rehearing was granted primarily to afford us additional opportunity to restudy the testimony bearing upon this fact. The record does not disclose that sort of convincing proof of the value of the cattle when killed that a court wishes to have before it when assessing the amount to be paid by the one responsible for the killing.

We affirmed the judgment of the lower court in plaintiff’s favor, which was for $425. This amount is equal to a value of $60.71 per head for the seven head allowed for. The owner of the cattle testified that the ten head killed were worth $575 to him, and he sued for this amount Apparently the lower court awarded judgment for ten head, which would give an average value of $42.50. All of these values appear to be somewhat excessive.

The killed cattle were raised on the plantation of Mr.' O. W. Hollingsworth. He was well acquainted with'them and testified they were “scrub” cattle and not worth over $10 per head on the average. The testimony of the Farm Demonstration Agent of Red River Parish as to the value of such cattle in the fall of 1931 is very uncertain, indefinite, and unsatisfactory. He was not acquainted with the cattle. The most that can be said of his testimony as to the value of the cattle in 1931 is that they probably were worth not less than 7 cents per pound.

The situation is such that we shall have to either remand the ease on the question of the value of the cattle, or to some extent arbitrarily fix such value, allowing all the testimony in the case to influence us as far as we think it should, all things considered. In view of the small amount involved, we have decided not to prolong the litigation by remanding the case.

We have decided to adopt a value of $30 per head for the seven cattle for which defendant should pay; and for the reasons assigned, the judgment of the lower court and our former judgment are amended by reducing the amounts thereof to $210, and as amended, our former judgment is reinstated and made final.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Iron / Malaria.
    Date: October 22, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Rita Anand, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd. Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1487, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6e616e616b7d4f626e66632161666721686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6878887888294a68b878f8ac8888f8ec8818990">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22894 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>