alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report included in this Form 10-K into the following Registration
Statements of Lafarge Corporation previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission: (i) Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 2-92414,
(ii) Registration Statement on Form S-8, Form 33-9813, (iii) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-32645, (iv) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-32644 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 6
to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), (v) Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-20865, (vi) Registration Statement on Form
S-3, File No. 33-46093 (which also constitutes Post-Effective Amendment No. 7
of Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 2-82548), and (vii)
Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 33-51873.

                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2131 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2131

  To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through 
                           fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2001

  Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Crowley, Mr. 
 Bereuter, Mr. Sununu, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Leach, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. 
  Chabot, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Baird, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
 Camp, Mr. Cardin, Mr. English, Mr. Frank, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. 
Hobson, Mr. Kirk, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Oxley, Ms. Pryce of 
Ohio, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Wexler, and Ms. Woolsey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through 
                           fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO SUPPORT REDUCTION OF DEBT 
              UNDER THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961 AND TITLE I OF 
              THE AGRICULTURAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSISTANCE ACT OF 
              1954.

    (a) Reauthorization.--Section 806 of the Tropical Forest 
Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations for Fiscal Years After Fiscal 
Year 2001.--For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 
Credit Reform Act of 1990) for the reduction of any debt pursuant to 
this section or section 807, there are authorized to be appropriated to 
the President the following:
            ``(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.
            ``(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.
            ``(3) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 808(a)(1)(D) of the Tropical 
Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431f(a)(1)(D)) is amended 
by striking ``to appropriated under sections 806(a)(2) and 807(a)(2)'' 
and inserting ``to be appropriated under sections 806(a)(2), 807(a)(2), 
and 806(d)''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 99.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

|   | 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|   | 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  |   |   |                                                                                                                          |
|--|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   |   | /s/ THOMAS L. REDDING                                                                                                         |
|  |        |        |    **Thomas L. Redding, C.F.O.****(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**
Date: November 12,2002
  |
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55070-55071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP08-484-000; RP08-484-001]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

September 17, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference 
in the above-referenced proceeding on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, at 10 
a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    The Commission's August 28, 2008 Order \1\ directed that a 
technical conference be held to address the issues raised by Colorado 
Interstate Gas Company's (CIG) August 1, 2008 and August 8, 2008 tariff 
filings to modify its penalty crediting mechanism. Commission Staff and 
parties will have the opportunity to discuss all of the issues raised 
by CIG's filing including, but not limited to, technical, engineering 
and operational issues, and issues related to the interpretation of 
tariff provisions governing CIG's penalty crediting mechanism.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 124 FERC ] 61,191 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility

[[Page 55071]]

accommodations please send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#056466666076766c676c696c717c45636077662b626a73"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0a1a3a3a5b3b3a9a2a9aca9b4b980a6a5b2a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
toll free (866) 208-3372 (voice) or (202) 502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax 
to (202) 208-2106 with the required accommodations.
    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact Timothy Duggan at (202) 502-8326 or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35615c585a415d4c1b71405252545b75535047561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b3f0206041f0312452f1e0c0c0a052b0d0e1908450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22262 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Marte, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 295]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.), rendered on or about April 3, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge *477or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 12Federal Reserve Bank of: San FranciscoFilings received during the week ending July 26, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodSECURITY CALIFORNIA BANCORP                                                                                             3A1Security California Bancorp to become a bank  holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Security Bank of California, both of Riverside, California.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicable
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

To Inland Resources Inc.:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of our 
reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto, to any
reference made to us in Form 10-K as a result of such incorporation and to the
incorporation by reference thereof into Inland's registration statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-41662), Form S-8 (File No. 333-27449), Form S-8 (File No.
33-84640) and Form S-3 (File No. 33-84766).



                                 /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                     RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Denver, Colorado

March 29, 1999
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 327,854 18,292 40,442 37,107 56,737 61,17Number of loans 8,734 3,347 2,727 1,116 862 46Weighted average maturity (months)1 30.07 10.43 17.61 13.33 20.64 70.3

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 14.84 6.51 8.90 7.83 10.29 26.6

Weighted average risk rating3 2.65 2.46 2.61 2.42 2.64 2.7

Weighted average interest rate4 6.40 6.96 6.75 6.94 6.59 6.4

 Standard error5 .14 .23 .18 .29 .21 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.00 7.64 7.71 7.59 7.01 7.1 25th percentile 5.88 6.14 6.06 6.17 6.17 5.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.02 6.69 7.02 7.12 7.14 7.0 Other livestock 7.06 7.19 7.29 7.69 6.37 6.8 Other current operating expenses7 6.17 6.71 6.56 6.75 6.43 5.9

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.58 7.70 7.02 6.99 6.69 9.0 Farm real estate 6.38 n.a. 6.57 n.a. 6.50 6.3 Other8 6.68 7.95 6.44 7.55 7.16 6.1

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 41.82 34.88 40.90 42.00 38.19 59.5 Under commitment 52.56 59.08 48.90 36.84 54.21 49.4 Callable 22.63 19.02 16.76 14.88 11.62 8.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.07 1.62 14.40 8.61 8.10 11.9 Other livestock 5.61 13.80 9.55 9.19 6.19 8.3 Other current operating expenses7 57.75 67.30 60.20 70.56 57.79 35.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.37 13.46 13.33 4.22 17.21 4.3 Farm real estate 9.06 n.a. 1.09 n.a. 2.82 22.5 Other8 10.14 3.83 1.43 7.42 7.90 17.8

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 21.20 8.50 14.00 11.98 7.52 42.2 Other 76.24 80.20 76.77 81.02 92.48 57.7 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Stephen Johnston, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00344-JL

Pauline Eastman

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

December 8, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00344-JL Document 12 Filed 12/02/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: December 2, 2008

cc: Christopher J. Seufert, Esq.

Friedrich Kreutzer Moeckel, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00344-JL Document 12 Filed 12/02/08 Page 2 of 2
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... 73 9 7 23 34 .146 .018 .015 .045 .064

2007...... 90 8 13 23 47 .170 .014 .025 .042 .085

2008...... 150 12 20 42 75 .269 .022 .037 .074 .129

2009...... 435 65 59 151 159 .743 .111 .108 .265 .271

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1502

To clarify the citizenship eligibility for certain members of the Tohono

O’odham Nation of Arizona, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Mr. PALLONE (for himself and Mr. PASTOR) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Judiciary

A BILL

To clarify the citizenship eligibility for certain members of

the Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR UNITED STATES CITIZEN4 SHIP; PASS AND REPASS OF BORDERS.

5 (a) APPLICATIONS FOR CITIZENSHIP GRANTED.—

6 For a period of 3 years beginning on the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, any member of the Tohono O’odham

8 Nation of Arizona residing on the lands of the Tohono

9 O’odham Nation of Arizona in Arizona or Mexico may

10 apply for United States citizenship. Such application shall
2

•HR 1502 IH

1 be made to the Immigration and Naturalization Service

2 and, upon receipt of the application, citizenship shall be

3 granted to the applicant.

4 (b) PASS AND REPASS OF BORDERS.—Notwith5 standing the Immigration and Nationality Act, all mem6 bers of the Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona shall be

7 entitled to pass and repass freely the borders of the United

8 States.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 24, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Broward Financial Holdings, Inc., to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Broward Bank 
of Commerce, both of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 25, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E8-22929 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Thomas Thompson,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 09-cv-82-SM

Todd Gordon, Nicholas

Granville, Vincent

Williams, John Does 1-5,

and Hillsborough County,

Defendants

O R D E R

A pretrial status conference was held on March 5, 2010. 

Michael J. Sheehan, Esq., appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. 

John A. Curran, Esq., appeared on behalf of the defendants.

The parties have not seriously discussed settlement, but

have at least initiated that process. The case is referred to

the Magistrate Judge for mediation after June 1, 2010.

Trial is rescheduled to commence with jury draw on August 3,

2010.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

March 5, 2010

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

John A. Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

Case 1:09-cv-00082-SM Document 15 Filed 03/05/10 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of John Park, Respondent, v John A. Kafica et al., Appellants.

[808 NYS2d 429]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, the appeal is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), dated June 23, 2004, as granted the petition and directed the Town of Greenburgh not to recoup General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits paid to the petitioner which accrued up to August 4, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under General Municipal Law § 207-c, a city, town, village, or fire district is required to pay a police officer who is injured while performing his duty the “full amount of his regular salary or wages until his disability arising therefrom has ceased” (General Municipal Law § 207-c [1]). The statute is remedial in nature and is intended to provide a benefit, among others, to *803police officers, and thus the courts have determined that it is to be construed liberally in their favor *(see Matter of Mashnouk v Miles,*55 NY2d 80, 88 [1982]; *Matter of Curley v Dilworth,*96 AD2d 903, 904 [1983]).

Furthermore, the right of a disabled police officer to receive disability benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c is a property interest giving rise to procedural due process protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States before those benefits are terminated *(see Matter of City of Cohoes [Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes, Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO),*94 NY2d 686, 691 [2000]). As a result, the Supreme Court properly determined that the Town was not entitled retroactively to recoup General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits that it provided to the petitioner before August 4, 2003, the date after the conclusion of the due process hearing when the petitioner had been directed to return to work. Florio, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      345
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,072
<PP&E>                                         101,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,019
<BONDS>                                            731
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1<F1>
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,838
<SALES>                                          2,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,387
<CGS>                                              538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 166
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,206)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.44)
<FN>
<F1>(1) Represents par value of Reading Entertainment Series B preferred stock
</FN>


</TABLE>