alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
paradise
[pdse graphic omitted]                           music + entertainment, inc.
                                                ---------------------------
                                                 press release
                                                ---------------------------


              PARADISE OBTAINS $6 MILLION IN NEW CREDIT FACILITIES,
                         REDUCES DEBT AND CURES DEFAULT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New York City, New York - May 11, 2004 -- Paradise Music &  Entertainment,  Inc.
(OTCBB: PDSE),  announces $6 million in new credit facilities and renegotiates a
prior loan.

Paradise has obtained an agreement for mezzanine  financing with MME, Inc in the
aggregate  amount of $960,000 with warrants to purchase 10.6 million  restricted
shares of common stock in Paradise at $0.002 per share.

Porter  Capital (a  finance  company  that has  several  years of  history  with
Paradise)  has agreed to lend  Paradise  $40,000 and  received  warrants for the
right to purchase 500,000  restricted  shares of Paradise common stock at $0.002
per share.  Porter  agreed to reduce its debt from  $607,351.46  (the payment of
which is in default) and to accept $300,000. This new Senior Secured Note is due
and payable April 15, 2005. The Note contains a  provision  permitting it to  be
paid in full by the sale of stock that Porter  already  owns (or holds).  Porter
will also extend a $5 million  accounts  receivable  Line of Credit for Paradise
acquisitions.

Mr. Kelly Hickel,  Paradise Chairman and CEO, said,  "Management is pleased that
it has been able to cure its default with Porter and  negotiate  this  financing
which  it  believes  will  increase  shareholder  value.  It  is  important  for
management  to know that it has the capital  necessary  for Paradise to take its
next steps forward."



CONTACTS:
KELLY HICKEL                                  JOHN LEFEBVRE
Paradise Music & Entertainment                Shareholder Relations
888-565-3259                                  303-457-2852
kthickel@aol.com                              john@shareholder-relations.net


This press release may contain forward-looking  statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Investors are cautioned that these
forward-looking  statements  involve  uncertainties  and risks that could  cause
actual  performance  and results of operations to differ  materially  from those
anticipated. These risks and uncertainties include issues related to the ability
to: obtain  sufficient  funding to continue  operations,  maintain adequate cash
flow,   profitably  exploit  new  ventures,   as  well  as  other  factors.  The
forward-looking  statements contained herein represent the Company's judgment as
of the date of this release and it cautions  readers not to place undue reliance
on such  statements.  Paradise  assumes no obligation  to update the  statements
contained in this release.

                                      # # #
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

The Bridges Owners Association, Inc.

v. Case No. 05-mc-002-JM

Michael Taylor and

CDN, Inc.

O R D E R

 Defendants each failed to comply with subpoena duces tecum

served on May 2, 2005, requiring them to appear on May 27, 2005. 

On August 17, 2005 both defendants were ordered to show cause why

they failed to comply with the subpoena and why they should not

be held in contempt. Defendants failed and refused to comply

with the order. Plaintiff now seeks an order finding defendants

in contempt of court. Mr. Taylor’s response that he has turned

this over to his insurance company and that he “am not to go to

any court without my insurance company by my side” is inadequate

as an objection. I find that both parties willfully disregarded

the subpoenas and the order of the court. I find them in

contempt of court. 

18 U.S.C. § 401 empowers the court to punish disobedience or

resistance to the court’s order by fine or imprisonment. The

court will hold a hearing on the order of contempt on October 17,

Case 1:05-mc-00002-JM Document 11 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1Failure to appear will result in the issuance of bench

warrants for their arrest. 

2

2005 at 11:00 a.m. Michael Taylor and all officers of CDN, Inc.

shall appear for the hearing.1 Since the hearing may result in a

period of incarceration, defendant Taylor is entitled to appear

with counsel and if he qualifies he may file for appointed

counsel. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: September 27, 2005

cc: Timothy A. Gudas, Esq.

 Michael Taylor, pro se

Case 1:05-mc-00002-JM Document 11 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2003: Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Bonorable Tor **A.** Craven county Auditor, 4LhLan **coallt~ Waco,**  Toxar
Dear Sir:

rrolato receltlng hether or not Artiri1 ststutes or Taxar to oherge a is8 ‘of SON al in addition to the

, Vernon’8 Annotated Ciril Statute8, prorlde8,

“Clerk8 of tlm CountI Court 8hall reoalre the Sollolling 

### r888: ** l l oopirr ot lntrrrogutorler, ero88- lntrrro6atorirr and all other paper8 ot reoord **required** to **be** ooplrd by him, inoladlng eertltloatr oi 8ea1, where the oopf doe8 not l xoeed 800 rord8,tor l

aoh 100 word8 154. #hea the oopy oxorrdr 200 rordr, ior.eaoh additional 100 word8 ln 010088 0r eoo UOrd8, log l * l Eaoh oertiri-

.“.-._.^“.--^----..---..-- .- I --_.-- ..-..-., ^-....^-

. . . --- .-------- --- ----.-Oat@ to any raot or faotr oontalnedIn the re-
., oordr of hlr ofiloa 4th O~rtiflCateand when not otherwi8oprovidedfor 80#* * *" Beal,

@enorally rpoakihg,it I8 well l 8tabli8hedin thla State, that **8tatUt.8** prerOribill6 tOO8 tOr poblloOttiOOr8 -0 **8triCtlr** oonetrurd# and honoo a right to ire8 ra1 not **rert** in inplioatlon. (So0 the **Oa808** of YoCalla va City ot Rookdalo, Fz46 9. W. 654; Binford v. Robinron, Z44 9. W. 8OTi and Tex. Jur., Vol. 34, p. 608) It 18 8tated in Tore8 JWl8PrUdanOe, 

### Volunm34, page 511:

**‘ A8**  herrlnbetoro 8totrd, the oompm8ation of pub110officer8 18 tlxed by the Conrtltutlon of Texa8. Any **ottiorr** may not claim or reaoh any nonor without a law authorizinghir to do 8o, and olrerlyfixing the amount to rhloh he **i8** ontitled.'

It will bo noted that thr foregoing **rtatute** (hrtiole3930, V. A. C. S) authorize8a oounty olerk to raoeltr rlrteen cent8 tor eaoh one hundredword8 wherr t& oopy doe8 not exceed two hundred word8 and ten oent for l aoh additionalon8 hundred word8 where the oopy

l xoeed8 two hundred word8 tor oopler of lnterroga**torirr, OrO88-interrOgstb?i@8**  and all other paper8 or raoordr rrqulrrd to bo ooplod 0~ hy, inolndinge8rtlfieatoand seal.

It 18 onr OpinlOn that that prOvi8iOnOi the 8tatUte reading: "raoh orrtifioatr 

### to an7 fact or faotr oontainedin tho reoordr of hi8 ottloo,rlth oartlfioatrand 8ea1, when not othenviw provided tor bo$ * ha8 no applioationwhatrooror

### to tho quortion under oon**siderat** on.

**i** Theroioro,Jtrr OarOiull~oonrlderingArtiOlO 3930,V. A. c. S., it 18 our opinion that a oountt olork **18** not legallyauthorlzod to charge a tea oi ility oent8 iOr a oortiflaateand 8eal in iurnirhinga oortiflodOOp7 of a will On tile in hi8 offlco.
**fourr 7ort**  **truly**
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 2004...... 64.4 6.0 6.7 29.9 6.0 15.9 3.3 5.4 13.2 42.5 2005...... 59.3 6.6 5.1 26.9 6.7 14.0 2.9 4.7 12.5 39.2 2006...... 67.9 7.4 6.4 30.3 7.9 15.8 2.8 5.4 14.0 45.7 2007...... 64.8 5.6 5.6 32.5 5.5 15.6 2.7 5.7 14.8 41.6 2008...... 77.6 5.6 7.4 40.2 3.8 20.7 2.5 5.7 15.1 54.4 2005: Q2... 76.6 7.7 3.7 29.9 11.0 24.3 3.8 5.9 12.7 54.1  Q3... 59.1 3.4 6.1 24.4 10.1 15.2 3.2 4.7 12.6 38.7  Q4... 46.4 10.2 5.5 18.8 3.2 8.7 2.2 4.1 11.0 29.1 2006: Q1... 67.0 5.3 6.2 40.2 4.5 10.9 2.9 4.7 14.3 45.1  Q2... 80.2 5.0 6.2 34.8 16.6 17.7 3.3 6.7 15.4 54.7  Q3... 63.5 9.2 7.3 21.8 5.2 20.0 2.6 5.6 12.2 43.2  Q4... 60.8 10.0 6.1 24.5 5.4 14.8 2.3 4.7 14.1 39.7 2007: Q1... 69.6 5.9 5.3 40.0 3.5 14.9 2.3 4.8 13.4 49.1  Q2... 61.7 3.7 4.1 35.0 5.4 13.5 3.4 6.8 16.2 35.3  Q3... 53.6 3.3 4.9 23.9 7.5 14.1 2.6 5.4 13.1 32.4  Q4... 74.4 9.3 8.3 31.2 5.5 20.1 2.7 5.7 16.3 49.7 2008: Q1... 83.7 6.6 5.9 47.7 3.2 20.3 2.3 5.6 14.0 61.9  Q2... 76.7 4.5 6.3 39.4 5.8 20.7 2.9 5.6 16.5 51.6  Q3... 69.1 3.3 7.6 35.3 3.9 19.0 2.4 5.3 12.8 48.5  Q4... 81.1 8.0 9.7 38.5 2.3 22.6 2.6 6.1 17.0 55.4  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Ronald P. Donohue

v. Civil No. 08-cv-459-PB

Michael J. Ashe, Jr., et al

O R D E R - A M E N D E D

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $10.20 is due no later than

December 7, 2008. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s

income credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

Northern NH Correctional Facility when the amount in the account

exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure

to pay the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action

without prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for

in forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 7, 2008

cc: Ronald P. Donohue

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Northern NH Correctional Facility, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00459-PB Document 4 Filed 11/07/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000717374
<NAME> 82II.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         179,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               293,197
<PP&E>                                       9,058,497
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,457,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,893,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,546
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,876,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,893,741
<SALES>                                        732,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               795,824
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  472,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                322,918
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            322,918
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   322,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    36.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 185

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment rights,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Ms. SLAUGHTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first

amendment rights, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Right To

5 Know Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

7 Title XI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended

8 by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘SEC. 1107. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision

10 of law, no governmental authority shall in or through any
2

•HR 185 IH

1 program or activity, administered or assisted by such au2 thority, that provides health care services or information,

3 limit the right of any person to provide, or the right of

4 any person to receive, nonfraudulent information about

5 the availability of reproductive health care services, includ6 ing family planning, prenatal care, adoption, and abortion

7 services.

8 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

9 ‘‘(1) the term ‘governmental authority’ means

10 any authority of any State or of the United States;

11 and

12 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ includes the District of

13 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or

14 possession of the United States.’’.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02192-REB-CBS FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402

Date: December 1, 2011 Courtroom Deputy: Emily Seamon 

Parties: Counsel:

MARJORIE A. KESSLING, and

TRENTON H. PARKER, 

Plaintiffs,

Pro se (no appearance)

Pro se

v.

BRUCE T. BARKER, in his individual and

official capacity,

STEPHANIE L. ARRIES, in her individual

and official capacity,

BETHANY SALZMAN, in her individual and

official capacity,

GARY SCHWARTZ, in his individual and

official capacity,

NICK MAEGHER, individually,

JOHN COOK, in his individual and official

capacity, and

THE WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,

individually and in their official capacities,

Defendants.

Mark Ratner 

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 10:14 a.m. 

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Pro se Plaintiff Marjorie Kessling fails to appear. 

Discussion between the Court and counsel regarding Defendants Barker, Arries, Salzman,

Schwartz, Cook and “The Weld County Commissioners” Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) [Doc. No. 3]; Defendants Barker, Arries, Salzman, Schwartz, Cook

Case 1:11-cv-02192-REB-CBS Document 13 Filed 12/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
and the Weld County Commissioners’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Determination of

Entitlement to Absolute and Qualified Immunity [Doc. No. 6]; and Plaintiffs’ Late Answer and

Motion to Amend Original Complaint for Cause [Doc. No. 9].

ORDERED: Plaintiffs shall submit a proposed amended complaint to the Court on or before

December 9, 2011.

ORDERED: Defendants Barker, Arries, Salzman, Schwartz, Cook and the Weld County

Commissioners’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Determination of

Entitlement to Absolute and Qualified Immunity [Doc. No. 6] is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Court will issue an Order to Show Cause why Ms. Kessling should not be sanctioned for

failure to appear for the hearing today. If Ms. Kessling files a proposed amended complaint on

or before December 9, 2011, the Order to Show Cause will be discharged.

Hearing Concluded.

Court in recess: 10:29 a.m.

Total time in court: 00:15

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at

(303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Case 1:11-cv-02192-REB-CBS Document 13 Filed 12/01/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 11

- 00708

- CV

CHARLES E. SMITH AND BETTY M. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES FOR THE SMITH FAMILY TRUST

v. LONG ISLAND VILLAGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. F/K/A OUTDOOR RESORTS/SOUTH PADRE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. AN D PAST AND PRESENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LONG ISLAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. F/K/A OUTDOOR RESORTS/SOUTH PADRE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC.

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2011

- DCL

- 7171

- I

JUDGMENT
THE THIRT EENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further o rder this decision certified below for observance.

July 31, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2015 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2015

   To redesignate the Federal building located at 3348 South Kedzie 
  Avenue, in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Paul Simon Chicago Job Corps 
                               Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2001

 Mr. Costello introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To redesignate the Federal building located at 3348 South Kedzie 
  Avenue, in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Paul Simon Chicago Job Corps 
                               Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAUL SIMON CHICAGO JOB CORPS CENTER.

    (a) In General.--The Federal building located at 3348 South Kedzie 
Avenue, in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the ``Chicago Job Corps 
Center'' shall be known and designated as the ``Paul Simon Chicago Job 
Corps Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Paul Simon Chicago Job Corps Center.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending July 19, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodWEBFIVE MHC                                                                                                             * 3A1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending June 23, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCENTERGROUP FINANCIAL, INC.                                                                                             * 3A1CenterGroup Financial, Inc., Milford, OH to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of the CenterBank, Milford, OH, pursuant to section 3(a)(1)of the Bank Holding Company ActNewspaper: 07/15/2012Federal Register: 07/16/2012KENTUCKY FIRST FEDERAL BANCORP                                                                                          MHC Minority Stock Issuance