alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**March 2007**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: April 09, 2007**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 08-cv-181-SM

$6,700 U.S. Currency,

More or Less, Seized

From Edward Gillespe,

NOTICE OF RULING

Re: (Document No. 10) Motion to Strike Claim

Ruling: Granted in part and denied in part. 

Claimant, acting pro se, has filed what appears to be a

timely claim, but it is unsworn. The applicable procedural rules

require the claim to be verified (that is, "signed by the

claimant under the penalties of perjury"). Rule 5G(5)(a)(i)(C),

Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset

Forfeiture Actions. Given the complexities of asset forfeiture

proceedings and claimant's pro se status, and the traditional

admiralty view that libels and procedural practices should be

construed liberally, as well as the court's discretion to grant

additional time for the filing of a claim or other critical

pleading "so that to the greatest extent possible controversies

are decided on the merits," claimant will be permitted to file a

verified claim (i.e., under the penalties of perjury), within 15

days of the date of this order. One Urban Lot Located at

1 Street A-1, 885 F.2d, 994, 1001 (1st Cir. 1989). 

Claimant is reminded, however, that a verified complaint is

required for the very purpose of preventing false claims, by

exposing a false claimant to prosecution. It is perhaps worth

noting that claimant suggests that the funds at issue, taken from

a man who admitted that the funds were his and were related to

drug dealing activity, were in fact obtained from claimant's

mother and represent both wages for carpentry work done by the

man who admitted otherwise, and an investment of sorts in a

clothing design project. Claimant supports her suggestion with a

redacted bank statement belonging to her mother and relating to

February of 2008, which merely shows a deposit into that account

of just over $5,000 - i.e., the document does not indicate the

Case 1:08-cv-00181-SM Document 11 Filed 09/09/08 Page 1 of 2
2

source of the deposited funds, nor does it disclose a

disbursement from claimant's mother to either the claimant or to

the man who has admitted the seized funds were related to illegal

drug activity. 

Should claimant decline to file a verified claim as allowed,

the unsworn claim will be stricken.

Additionally, claimant should note that an answer to the

forfeiture complaint must be filed within 20 days after the

verified claim is filed. 

Entered by: Steven J. McAuliffe, Chief Judge

Date: September 10, 2008

cc: Seth R. Aframe, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00181-SM Document 11 Filed 09/09/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         235,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  741,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                   133,199
<INVENTORY>                                     49,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,863,340
<PP&E>                                       1,137,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                 963,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,095,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,604,546
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        225
<COMMON>                                        24,570
<OTHER-SE>                                   (457,692)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,095,290
<SALES>                                        545,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               825,046
<CGS>                                          626,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  471,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,521,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,521,389
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,521,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-34-SM

Mark Williams

O R D E R

Defendant Mark Williams has filed a motion to continue the trial (document no.17). 

Trial has been rescheduled for the December 2008 trial period. Defendant Williams shall file

a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than September 8, 2008. On the filing of such waiver,

the continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv),

in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time

necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: November 18, 2008 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: December 2, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

August 26, 2008 

cc: Thomas F. McCue, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00034-SM Document 18 Filed 08/26/08 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                Exhibit 23.3
   

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


     1)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1988 Stock
          Incentive Plan (File #33-38427).

     2)   Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Dividend
          Reinvestment Plan (File #33-37382).

     3)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Director Fee
          Plan (File #33-48031).

     4)   Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Main Line
          Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Agreements (File #33-50526).

     5)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1990 Non-Employee
          Directors' Stock Option Plan (File #33-59372).

     6)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Stock
          Incentive Plan (File #33-68800).

     7)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Elmwood Bancorp,
          Inc. Key Employee Stock Compensation Program (File #33-77358)

     8)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Amended and
          Restated Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with Donald E. Stone
          (File #33-77354).

     9)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to The Frankford
          Corporation 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan (File #33-82088).

     10)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Employee Stock
          Purchase Plan File #33-91572).

     11)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Management
          Stock Purchase Plan (File #33-91574).
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the above listed
     Registration Statements of Keystone Financial, Inc. of our report dated
     January 28, 1994, incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
     Form 10-K of Elmwood Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1993.

 

     DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
     Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 
     March 25, 1996
6H 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0655

LEAH STEMBLER,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

v.

VINCENT GELDERLOOS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Steven Allen Hanson, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this November 29, 2023.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Jami L. Rebsom, Helene Orenstein, Steven Allen Hanson

11/29/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0655
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 54283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21974]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 182 / Thursday, September 18, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 54283]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2008-24 of August 15, 
                2008

                
Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Defense

                Continuation of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to 
                the Government of Colombia

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 1012 
                of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
                Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I hereby 
                certify, with respect to Colombia, that (1) 
                interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be 
                primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in that 
                country's airspace is necessary because of the 
                extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking 
                to the national security of that country; and (2) that 
                country has appropriate procedures in place to protect 
                against innocent loss of life in the air and on the 
                ground in connection with such interdiction, which 
                shall at a minimum include effective means to identify 
                and warn an aircraft before the use of force is 
                directed against the aircraft.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register and 
                to notify the Congress of this determination.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, August 15, 2008

[FR Doc. E8-21974
Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jeffrey Carano

v. Case No. 07-cv-124-PB

NH Governor, et al.

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 11, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

June 21, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cv-00124-PB Document 16 Filed 06/21/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1936 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1936

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the oak tree as the 
                  national tree of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2001

 Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Goss, and Mr. Osborne) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the oak tree as the 
                  national tree of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL TREE.

    (a) Designation.--Chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 305. National tree
    ``The tree genus Quercus, commonly known as the oak tree, is the 
national tree.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Title 36 is amended--
            (1) in the table of contents for part A of subtitle I, by 
        striking ``, and March'' and inserting ``March, and Tree'';
            (2) in the chapter head for chapter 3, by striking ``, AND 
        MARCH'' and inserting ``MARCH, AND TREE''; and
            (3) in the table of sections for chapter 3, by adding at 
        the end the following:

``305. National tree.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Evangelos Pashos

v. Civil No. 06-cv-021-PB

CIGNA Corporation, et al.

O R D E R

 Plaintiff moves for discovery or in the alternative to

modify the administrative record. Defendants’ response indicates

that the records sought can be added by agreement or do not

exist. Plaintiff’s requests are determined as follows: 

1. The 1983 policy is added to the administrative

record by agreement; 

2. The 1980's summary plan description cannot be

located; 

3. The proffered correspondence is added by

agreement; 

4. The referenced “vocational rehabilitation report”

does not exist; and

5. Defendants are deemed to have admitted the loss of

plaintiff’s file as it existed prior to 1990. 

Case 1:06-cv-00021-PB Document 17 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The request to suspend LR 9.4 is denied. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 24, 2006

cc: David S.V. Shirley, Esq.

 William D. Pandolph, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00021-PB Document 17 Filed 04/24/06 Page 2 of 2
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... n.a. 9 7 n.a. n.a. n.a. .018 .015 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1



---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence M. Kimbrough, state and attest that I am the President and Chief
Executive Officer of First Charter Corporation (the Company). I hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



| |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2002 containing financial statements (the periodic report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
| |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.                                                                       

|                                                                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence M. Kimbrough

Name:  Lawrence M. Kimbrough
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 6, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Holmes, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 884]

Applicant by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 15, 2004 *(People v Holmes,*12 AD3d 532 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 19, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Mastro and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54171-54172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21844]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,589]

Delfingen US, Inc. Formerly Known as M&Q Plastics Products Also 
Known as Safanou, Inc., San Antonio, Texas; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and a Negative 
Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on July 16, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Delfingen US, Inc., San Antonio, Texas. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on July 30, 2008 (73 FR 44283).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in employment related to the production of convoluted protective 
plastic covers for wire harnesses.
    New information shows that in March 2008, Delfingen US, Inc. 
purchased M&Q Plastic Products. Currently some of the workers wages at 
the subject firm are being reported under several Unemployment 
Insurance (UI) tax accounts for Delfingen US, Inc., formerly known as 
M&Q Plastic Products, also known as Safanou, Inc.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Delfingen US, Inc., formerly known as M&Q Plastic Products, 
also known as Safanou, Inc. who were adversely affected by a shift in 
production of convoluted protective plastic covers for wire harnesses 
to Mexico.

[[Page 54172]]

    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,589 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Delfingen US, Inc., formerly known as M&Q 
Plastic Products, also known as Safanou, Inc., San Antonio, Texas, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after June 24, 2007, through July 16, 2010, are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974.'' I further determine that all workers of Delfingen US, Inc., 
formerly known as M&Q Plastic Products, also known as Safanou, Inc., 
San Antonio, Texas, are denied eligibility to apply for alternative 
trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 
1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of September 2008
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-21844 Filed 9-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```