alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24

Power of Attorney

Each person below designates and appoints ROBERT D. SZNEWAJS and ANDERS GILTVEDT, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, of West Coast Bancorp, an Oregon corporation, and any amendments thereto, and to file said report and amendments, with all exhibits thereto, in such form as they or either of them may approve with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Each person whose signature appears below also grants to these attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to perform every act and execute any instruments that they deem necessary or desirable in connection with said report, as fully as he or she could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the attorneys-in-fact and agents or their
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this power of attorney has been executed by each of the undersigned as of the 23rd day of January, 2007.

| | Signature                  | Title                             
| | -------------------------- | ----------------------------------
| |                           
| | /s/ Lloyd D. Ankeny        |                                   
| | Lloyd D. Ankeny            | Director and Chairman of the Board
| |                           
| | /s/ Michael J. Bragg       |                                   
| | Michael J. Bragg           | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ Duane C. McDougall     |                                   
| | Duane C. McDougall         | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ Steven J. Oliva        |                                   
| | Steven J. Oliva            | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ J.F. Ouderkirk         |                                   
| | J.F. Ouderkirk             | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ Steven N. Spence       |                                   
| | Steven N. Spence           | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ David J. Truitt        |                                   
| | David J. Truitt            | Director                          
| |                           
| | /s/ Nancy A. Wilgenbusch   |                                   
| | Nancy A. Wilgenbusch, PhD. | Director                          

81

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randy S . Campney, Sr.

v . Civil No. 06-cv-297-JD

Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Superintenden t

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated December 19, 2007, Document #54, no objection having been

filed .

SO ORDERED.

January 15, 2008 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc : Randy S. Campney, Sr., pro se

Stephen D . Fuller, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00297-JD Document 57 Filed 01/15/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-66-PB

John Wilder

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

August 19, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to prepare a defense or negotiate a resolution. 

The government does not object to a continuance of the trial.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 19, 2008 to December 2, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

Case 1:08-cr-00066-JD Document 10 Filed 08/04/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 31, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

November 17, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

August 4, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Donald Feith, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00066-JD Document 10 Filed 08/04/08 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2134

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 to increase the phase-in limitation applicable to the guarantee

under such title of benefit improvements made prior to plan termination.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. SANDERS (for himself, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. LEE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms.

KAPTUR, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. COSTELLO,

Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GOODE, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. BROWN of Ohio,

and Ms. HART) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to increase the phase-in limitation applicable to the guarantee under such title of benefit improvements made prior to plan termination.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2134 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN PHASE-IN LIMITATION APPLICA2 BLE TO THE GUARANTEE UNDER TITLE IV OF

3 ERISA OF BENEFIT IMPROVEMENTS MADE

4 PRIOR TO PLAN TERMINATION.

5 Section 4022(b)(7)(B) of the Employee Retirement

6 Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1322(b)(7)(B))

7 is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(B) $118.56 per month, multiplied by a frac9 tion, the numerator of which is the contribution and

10 benefit base (determined under section 230 of the

11 Social Security Act) in effect at the time the plan

12 terminates and the denominator of which is such

13 contribution and benefit base in effect in the cal14 endar year 1997.’’.

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TRANSITIONAL RULES.

16 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

17 this Act shall apply with respect to plan terminations oc18 curring on or after January 1, 1997.

19 (b) APPLICATIONS FOR UNDERPAYMENTS.—In the

20 case of any payment to an individual by the Pension Ben21 efit Guaranty Corporation prior to the date of the enact22 ment of this Act which is less than the correct amount

23 by reason of the amendment made section 1, the Corpora24 tion shall pay the remainder of such amount owed to such

25 individual upon receipt of a written application filed by

26 such individual with the Corporation in such form and
3

•HR 2134 IH

1 manner as shall be prescribed by the Corporation. Such

2 payments of amounts owed shall include interest computed

3 at the rate imposed under section 6601(a) of the Internal

4 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to interest on under5 payment, nonpayment, or extensions of time for payment

6 of tax).

7 (c) NO REDUCTION.—Nothing in this Act or the

8 amendment made thereby shall cause a reduction in the

9 level of guaranteed benefits payable to any individual

10 under title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Secu11 rity Act of 1974.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Karen P. Taylor, Respondent. Naples Central School District, Appellant; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 800]

*893Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 2, 2004, which ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

We remitted this matter to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board so that its basis for determining that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits could be set forth (18 AD3d 1088 [2005]). In a decision filed September 1, 2005, the Board sustained the initial determination, holding claimant eligible to receive benefits and the matter is now before us on the sole issue of whether substantial evidence supports this determination.

It is well settled that whether an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits is totally unemployed is a factual issue within the province of the Board and must be sustained if supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Schulman [Commissioner of Labor],*9 AD3d 647, 648 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 708 [2005]). The Board determined, based upon the uncontested evidence, that claimant had the requisite number of “effective days” of total unemployment *(see*Labor Law § 523) to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits, despite her continued periodic employment as a per diem substitute teacher by the Naples Central School District. Inasmuch as the Board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, we find no reason to disturb its conclusion. Moreover, as claimant’s application for benefits did not commence between academic years or terms, but within the academic year, Labor Law § 590 (10) has no application *(see Matter of Curto [Siena Coll.—Roberts],*132 AD2d 751, 752 [1987]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 297,125 14,994 37,202 43,649 45,185 58,59Number of loans 8,006 2,817 2,710 1,286 669 40Weighted average maturity (months)1 23.76 9.69 10.14 14.11 28.75 60.8

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 15.49 5.63 6.55 9.04 19.37 47.6

Weighted average risk rating3 2.53 2.67 2.38 2.78 2.28 2.5

Weighted average interest rate4 6.46 7.04 6.68 7.08 6.60 6.6

 Standard error5 .13 .21 .19 .28 .25 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.01 7.92 7.38 8.00 7.02 7.5 25th percentile 5.88 6.11 6.15 6.40 6.09 6.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.35 7.21 6.88 7.94 6.18 6.8 Other livestock 7.45 7.93 6.20 7.66 7.36 7.6 Other current operating expenses7 6.48 6.79 6.60 6.72 6.65 7.5

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.07 6.78 7.14 7.29 6.54 n. Farm real estate 6.00 7.79 6.15 5.35 6.14 6.2 Other8 6.75 8.79 6.75 7.06 6.58 6.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 47.73 35.71 33.47 34.88 37.80 20.1 Under commitment 57.20 57.29 68.10 52.02 45.45 22.0 Callable 27.71 27.66 22.85 20.55 41.65 16.6 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 16.56 12.40 17.69 12.86 19.09 20.4 Other livestock 6.49 13.34 4.83 15.05 14.29 4.2 Other current operating expenses7 51.82 64.75 65.74 51.91 45.90 18.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.40 6.74 10.18 13.41 5.35 n. Farm real estate 18.40 .97 1.05 2.51 11.47 51.6 Other8 2.32 1.80 .50 4.26 3.89 4.8

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 22.66 10.44 2.25 9.09 18.79 59.4 Other 76.16 86.07 94.91 88.79 78.97 40.5 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1902

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit forced overtime

hours for certain health care employees who provide care to patients.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 2001

Mr. LANGEVIN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, and Mr. FRANK)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit

forced overtime hours for certain health care employees

who provide care to patients.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Care Employ5 ees Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. NURSES AND OVERTIME HOURS.

7 Section 7(j) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938

8 (29 U.S.C. 207(j)) is amended—
2

•HR 1902 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘No employer’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraph (2), no employer’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(2) An employer described in paragraph (1) may not

5 require an employee covered by an agreement or under6 standing described in such paragraph (other than a physi7 cian) who provides health care to patients to work more

8 than 8 hours in any workday or 80 hours in any 14-day

9 work period, except in the case of a natural disaster or

10 while a Federal, State, or local declaration of a state of

11 emergency is in effect in the locality in which such em12 ployee is employed. No such employer may discriminate

13 or take any other adverse action against such an employee

14 for declining to work more than 8 hours in a workday or

15 80 hours in a 14-day work period. Such an employee may

16 voluntarily work more than 8 hours in any workday or

17 more than 80 hours in a 14-day work period, at the re18 quest of the employee’s employer. Notwithstanding any

19 provision of title 5 or title 38, United States Code, to the

20 contrary, this paragraph applies to an employee appointed

21 under either such title (other than a physician) who pro22 vides health care to patients.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1






SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Gary F
Kimmons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
eDoorways Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/S/ Gary
F Kimmons






-------------------------------






Gary F
Kimmons


Chief
Executive and Principal Accounting Officer


February
9, 2009






This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Amendment No. 1 to Master Service Agreement



 Exhibit 10.21 
  
 Contract Reference Number: 4701A 
  

			
	[GRAPHIC]	 	This offer is voidable by Global Crossing if not signed by Customer and returned to Global Crossing by April 14th, 2001.

  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 This is an Amendment to the Retail
Competitive Services Agreement (“Agreement”) between Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., a Michigan corporation, with offices at 180 South Clinton Avenue, Rochester, New York, NY 4646 (“Global Crossing”) and Callwave, a
California corporation, with its principal office at 136 W Canon Perdido ST, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (“Customer”). 
  
 1 Except as otherwise stated, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 2 Customer agrees that the Initial Term of this Agreement shall remain the same. 

 
 3 [*] 
  
 4 The Monthly Minimum Charge under the Agreement shall remain the same. 
  
 5 The remainder of the Agreement and any other modifications thereto executed in writing between the Parties are not modified by this
Amendment and remain in full force and effect. 
  
 6 This Amendment is binding on
Global Crossing only on the date that it is signed by the executive who has authority for special pricing within Global Crossing’s Business Services Division corporate staff. 
  

									
	 Callwave
	 	 	 	 Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.

					
	By:	 	 /s/    DAVID S.
TRANDAL        

	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    MICHAEL L.
RIDDELL        


	 Printed Name:
	 	David S. Trandol	 	 	 	 Printed Name:
	 	MICHAEL L. RIDDELL
	 Title:
	 	Vice-President	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	DIRECTOR OF OFFER DEVELOPMENT
	 Date:
	 	 3-19-02
	 	 	 	 Date:
	 	 4/2/02


  
 Account Number: 0204134161 


	*	 	Confidential treatment has been requested for the bracketed portions. The confidential redacted portion has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995<F1>
<CASH>                                          50,596
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,691
<PP&E>                                          32,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,601
<BONDS>                                        120,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                    (32,972)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,517
<SALES>                                          4,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,392
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,573)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.19)
<FN>
<F1>THE FISCAL 1995 FINANCIAL DATA HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT A CHANGE IN 
ACCOUNTING METHOD RETROACTIVELY APPLIED BY THE COMPANY IN FISCAL 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Joseph SKAVINSKY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-10163.

D.C. No. CR-98-00601-ROS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

*742Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Thomas Joseph Skavinsky, Sr. appeals the revocation of supervised release and imposition of a ten-month sentence, following his violation of a special condition set forth in his original sentence for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.

Counsel for Skavinsky has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that he is unable to find issues that warrant review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Skavinsky has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Because we find the appeal to be without merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2201 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2201

  To amend title 38, United States Code, Section 1114 to increase the 
   compensation for disabled veterans who require aid and attendance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

  Mr. Peterson of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, Section 1114 to increase the 
   compensation for disabled veterans who require aid and attendance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1114 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (l), by deleting ``or is permanently 
        bedridden or so helpless as to be in need of regular aid and 
        attendance,'', and
            (2) in subsection (m), by omitting ``rendering such 
        veteran'' and inserting ``or is permanently bedridden or''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DataMEG,Corp., a New York corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A forthe three months ending  December 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrew Benson,Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to myknowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Andrew Benson                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:  Andrew Benson                        |
| Chairman  and Principal Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 1:09-cv-00092-PB   Document 6   Filed 03/17/09   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USA

v . Civil No. 09-mc-12-JD

Mark P. Sullivan

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 6, 2009, no objection having been filed . The Defendant is

ordered to obey the summons and he is ordered to appear on June 17, 2009 at

10:00 a .m., at 80 Daniel Street, Portsmouth, New Hampshire before David

Kalinowski, to give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession

or control required and called for by the terms of the summons of November 18,

2008 . The government is awarded its costs .

SO ORDERED.

June l, 2009 /s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: T. David Plourde, AUSA

Mark P. Sullivan

Case 1:09-mc-00012-JD Document 9 Filed 06/01/09 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending March 22, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodALPINE BANK OF ILLINOIS                                                                                                 Member