alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES —OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 

 
| ** ** | ** ** | **/S/****Jana Ahlfinger Bell** |
|------------|------------|--------------------------------|
|       |       | Jana Ahlfinger Bell            |
|       |       | Chief Financial Officer        |

 

**May ****17****, 2010**

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

1

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nicole Brodeur, et al.

v. Civil No. 07-cv-00206-JL

Claremont School District

et al.

 O R D E R

After today's hearing, an order will issue in the next week

or so DENYING the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to

Count 1, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motion for summary

judgment as to Counts 4 and 5 because discretionary function

immunity does not apply to those counts, GRANTING summary

judgment in favor of the defendants as to Counts 2, 3, and 6

through 11 (which has the effect of dismissing Grumman in his

personal capacity), and reserving judgment as to availability of

enhanced compensatory damages. By agreement of the parties,

Nicole Brodeur, no longer a minor, will be added to the caption

as a plaintiff. 

The parties may address the following two legal issues,

raised by the court during oral argument, through motions in

limine: (1) whether it is the Brodeur parents, or Nicole

herself, who is the proper plaintiff to recover the private

Case 1:07-cv-00206-JL Document 35 Filed 06/05/09 Page 1 of 2
 This is a significant distinction, because if Counts 4 1

and 5 do not reach a jury, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, 50, the

Brodeur parents will no longer be parties, because the summary

judgment is being granted on the remaining state law claims.

 If the Brodeur parents are the proper plaintiffs as to 2

the private school damages. Nicole will have no damages because

(a) she will have no right to recover the tuition, and (b) she

will be unable to recover emotional distress damages for the same

reasons underlying summary judgment for the defendants on Count

10 (lack of expert testimony). There is no evidence of

intentionally inflicted damage subsequent to or caused by the

negligence alleged in Counts 4 and 5--failure to comply with the

District sexual harassment policy. She will, however, be

entitled to seek emotional distress damages under Count 1, the

Title IX claim.

2

school tuition; and (2) whether, in the event that Nicole is 1

unable to prove conventional compensatory damages under Counts 4

and 5, she may nonetheless recover enhanced compensatory damages 2

under those counts.

New deadline for pretrial statements and motions in limine

is June 15. 

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 5, 2009

cc: Peter E. Hutchins, Esq.

Donna-Marie Cote, Esq.

Diane M. Gorrow, Esq.

Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00206-JL Document 35 Filed 06/05/09 Page 2 of 2
AutoCoded Document




AMENDMENT
TO
SHAREHOLDER
RIGHTS AGREEMENT



     THIS
AMENDMENT is made and entered into on the date last below written by and between
MERCANTILE BANCORP, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and MERCANTILE TRUST & SAVINGS
BANK, an Illinois banking corporation (the “Rights
Agent) 



     WHEREAS,
the Company and the Rights Agent have previously entered into a Shareholder
Rights Agreement dated July 9, 1999 (the
“Agreement”) pertaining to certain rights to
purchase shares of the Common Stock of the Company under certain circumstances
as set forth in the Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A; and 



     WHEREAS,
the Company and the Rights Agent wish to amend and revise the Agreement on the
terms and provisions as set forth in this Amendment. 



     NOW,
THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein
contained, it is hereby agreed the Agreement shall be amended and revised as
follows: 



     1.
Substitution of par value for shares of Common Stock. Any and all
references to the par value of the shares of Common Stock of the Company as
“par value $5.00 per share” in the Agreement, including any exhibits
thereto or summary thereof, shall be deleted and replaced with “par value
$6.25 per share.” 



     2.
No other changes. The Company and the Rights Agent hereby agree that
except as specifically provided in this Amendment, none of the provisions of the
Agreement are hereby amended or revised, and all of the terms and conditions
contained therein shall remain in full force and effect. 



     IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on
this 15th day of May, 2000. 


	COMPANY:	MERCANTILE BANCORP, INC.
	 
	 	By: /s/ Dan S. Dugan                 
	 	       Its President
	 
	RIGHTS AGENT:	MERCANTILE TRUST & SAVINGS BANK
	 
	 	By: /s/ Dan S. Dugan                 
	 	       Its President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-139-PB

Carl Connor et al.

O R D E R

Defendant, Carl Connor, through counsel, has moved to

continue the trial scheduled for April 7, 2009, citing an

impending superseding indictment and the need for additional time

to prepare for trial on the new charges. The government and codefendants do not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from April 7, 2009 to August 18, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00139-PB Document 32 Filed 03/10/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The March 26, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

July 27, 2009 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

March 10, 2009

cc: Andrew Schulman, Esq.

Dona Feeney, Esq.

Paul Garrity, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00139-PB Document 32 Filed 03/10/09 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R OB E R T E AR L J AC KS ON , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 10321 D . C. N o . 3 : 9 4 - c r - 0 0 0 4 4 - ECR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da E dw a r d C . R e e d, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , a n dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R o b ertE arlJack so n ap p eal s fro m th e d i stri ctco u rt ’ s o rd er d en yi n g h i s 18 U . S . C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) m ot i on f orr e duc t i on of

s e nt e nc e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. J a c k s o n c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db yf a ilin g to r e du c e h is 

# FI LED OC T 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJa ckson w as re spon sibl e f or approx i m at el y 14 k i l og ram s of c ra ck cocai ne. 1 09- 10321 2 sen t en ce p u rsu an tt o A m en d m en t7 0 6 t o th e U n i t edS t at es S en t en ci n g G u i d el i n es, w h ic h lo w e r e dth e s e n te n c in g r a n g e f o ro f f e n s e s in v o lv in g c r a c kc o c a in e . H ow ever , A m endm ent70 6 d i d n otl ow erthe base offe nse l evel for c ra ck offens es th ateq u al o r ex ceed4 . 5 k i l o g ram s. See U . S . S . G . § 2 D 1 . 1 (c)(1 ) (2 0 0 8 ). T h u s, 1 Ja ckson’ s s ent ence i s notbase d o n a se nt enci ng rang e thathas s ub se qu ent l y bee n lo w e r e db yth e S e n te n c in g C o m m is s io n , a s r e q u ir e db yS e c tio n 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . See U ni te d States v . L e ni e ar , 574 F . 3d 668, 673 ( 9th C i r . 2009) . J a c ks on’ s a r gum e nt th a t L e ni e ari s di s t i ngui s habl e be c aus e i ti nvol ve d the “ gr oupi ng” pr ovi s i on of the G u id e lin e s is w ith o u t m e r it. Se e i d. Ja ckson’ s argum entthatappl i ca t i on of L en i ea r i m prop er l y del egat es au th o r ityf

r o m C o n g r e s s to th e S e n te n c in g C o m m is s io n to d e f in e th e s u b

je c tm a tte rju r is d ic tio n o f

th e f e d e r a l c o u rts is a ls o w ith o u t m e r it. See 1 8 U .S .C . § 3582( c ) ( 2) ( c onf

e rr i ng j ur i s di c t i on upon the di s tr i c tc ourtt o m odi f yat e rm of i m pri sonm entfor adefe nd antw ho se se nt ence w as base d o n a rang e thathas s u b s e q u e n tlyb e e n lo w e r e db yth e S e n te n c in g C o m m is s io n ) ; se e al so D i l lon v. U ni ted States , 13 0 S . C t . 26 92 (201 0). J a c k s o n ’s r e q u e s t f

o ras ta yis d e n ie d . AF F I RME D.
Case 1:09-cv-00094-JL Document 96 Filed 07/16/12 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cv-00094-JL Document 96 Filed 07/16/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EFJ, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jana Ahlfinger BellJana Ahlfinger BellChief Financial Officer


August 1, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of Americ a

v . Criminal No. 08-cr-83-01-JD

Enrigue Ramirez-Reyes, a/k/a Jessi Ramire z

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

8) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : September 8, 200 8

cc : Jessica Brown, Esq .

Mark Zuckerman, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00083-JD Document 9 Filed 09/08/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

CIVIL ACTION NO. :

06-CV-00213

PETITION OF EULAH MCGRATH, LLC FOR EXONERATION FROM, OR

LIMITATION OF, LIABILITY

ORDER DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF NOTICE AND RESTRAINING SUITS

A petition having been filed herein by the above named petitioner as owner of the Fishing

Vessel EULAH MGRATH, for exoneration from and/or limitation of liability, pursuant to

sections 4283 through 4289 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, Title 46 U.S.C. Secs.

183 seq. and Rule F of the Supplemental Rules of Civil Procedure for any loss, damage, injury or

destruction caused by or resulting from the loss of the F/V EULAH MCGRATH during the

voyage of the F/V EULAH MCGRATH which commenced on or about April 16, 2006 at

Newington, New Hampshire and terminated on April 19, 2006 at Newington, New Hampshire,

as more fully described in the Petition.

Now on motion of Holbrook & Murphy, Attorneys for the petitioner, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. A Notice shall be issued by the Clerk of this court to all persons asserting claims with

respect to which the Petition seeks limitation admonishing them to file their respective claims

with the Clerk of this Court in writing, and serve on the attorneys for the petitioner a copy

thereof on or before the day of 2006 or be defaulted, and that if any claimant

desires to contest either the right to exoneration from or the right to limitation of liability, he

shall file and serve on attorneys for the petitioner an answer to the Petition so designated, or be

defaulted.

6 th December

Case 1:06-cv-00213-JM Document 9 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2. The aforesaid Notice shall be published in The Portsmouth Herald as provided by Rule

F(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure and copies of said notice shall be mailed in accordance with the said Rule

F(4).

3. The further prosecution of any and all actions, suits, and proceedings already

commenced and the commencement of prosecution thereafter of any and all suits, actions, or

proceedings, of any nature and description whatsoever in any jurisdiction and the taking of any

steps and the making of any motion in such actions, suits, or proceedings against the petitioner,

as aforesaid, or against the F/V EULAH MCGRATH or against any property of the petitioner

except in this action, to recover damages for or in respect of any loss, damage, injury or

destruction caused by or resulting from the aforesaid loss, occasioned or incurred on the voyage

of the F/V EULAH MCGRATH as alleged in the petition are hereby stayed and restraining until

the hearing and determination of this proceeding.

4. Service of this Order as a restraining order may be made through the Post Office by

mailing a conformed copy thereof to the person or persons to be restrained or to the respective

attorneys or alternatively by hand.

____________________________

Judge:

Dated at Concord, New Hampshire

this day of 2006.

/S/ JAMES R. MUIRHEAD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27th September 

Case 1:06-cv-00213-JM Document 9 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20620 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DOMINGUEZ MORALES

- MARTINEZ, also known as Lazaro Morin

- Morales, also known as Dominguez Morales, also known as Juan Antonio Morin

Morales, also known as Dominguez Morales Martinez, also known as Antonio Morin Mireles, also known as Juan A. Morin Mirele s, also known as Pedro Esquivel , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13

- CR

- 245

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Dominguez Morales

- Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 15, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20620 Document: 00512735689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2014No. 13

- 20620
Cir. 2011). Morales

- Martinez has file d a response and a motion for the appointment of new counsel . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Morales

- Martinez ’ s
response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presen ts no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, Morales

- Martinez’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20620 Document: 00512735689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2014
Exhibit 32.3




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Value Line, Inc. (the “Company”), for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Stephen R. Anastasio, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, as of the date hereof, to my knowledge:





1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and





2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods presented.




This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed to be “filed’ under the Exchange Act.  This Certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date:  July 29, 2011
By:   s/ Stephen R. AnastasioStephen R. AnastasioVice President and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; AA1 and AA4 Member Conflict 
Applications Review.
    Date: November 13, 2008.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIAAA, 5935, Fisher Lane, 3002, Rockville, MD, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Inst on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a212b3e3823242b0a272b232664242322642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d262c393f24232c0d202c242163232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22296 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972

To provide for the creation of an additional category of laborers or mechanics

known as helpers under the Davis-Bacon Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 23, 2001

Mr. NORWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To provide for the creation of an additional category of

laborers or mechanics known as helpers under the DavisBacon Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helpers Job Oppor5 tunity Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF DAVIS-BACON ACT.

7 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Helpers of laborers and me8 chanics shall be considered to be a separate classification

9 of laborers or mechanics for purposes of the Act of March

10 3, 1931 (Chapter 411; 46 Stat. 1494; 40 U.S.C. 276a et
2

•HR 1972 IH

1 seq.; commonly known as the Davis-Bacon Act). A helper

2 of a laborer or mechanic shall be paid the prevailing wage

3 of helpers of laborers or mechanics employed on projects

4 which are of a character similar to the project on which

5 the helper is employed and which are in the same city,

6 town, or other subdivision of the State (or District of Co7 lumbia) in which the helper is employed.

8 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of subsection (a),

9 the term ‘‘helper’’ means a semi-skilled worker (other than

10 a skilled journeyman mechanic) who—

11 (1) works under the direction of and assists a

12 journeyman;

13 (2) under the journeyman’s direction and su14 pervision, performs a variety of duties to assist the

15 journeyman, such as preparing, carrying, and fur16 nishing materials, tools, equipment, and supplies,

17 maintaining them in order, cleaning and preparing

18 work areas, lifting, positioning, and holding mate19 rials or tools, and other related semi-skilled tasks as

20 directed by the journeyman; and

21 (3) may use tools of the trade at and under the

22 direction and supervision of the journeyman.

Æ