alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1992...... 1.0 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.8 1.0 1.8 .3 1.5

1993...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.2 .8 1.4 .2 1.2

1994...... .8 .3 .4 .1 .3 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1995...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 2.1 .9 1.1 .3 .9

1996...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

1996: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.4 1.8 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q2... 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .3 .6 .2 .4 2.3 .8 1.5 .4 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.4 1.2 1.3 .3 1.0

1997: Q1... 1.3 .7 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.7 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.0 .7 1.3 .3 .9

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 .9 1.1 .2 .9

1998: Q1... 1.3 .8 .6 .2 .4 3.2 1.8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q2... 1.1 .5 .6 .2 .4 2.4 1.1 1.3 .5 .8

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.1 .8 1.3 .4 .9

 Q4... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999: Q1... 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .4 3.7 2.1 1.5 .5 1.0

 Q2... 1.3 .5 .7 .2 .5 2.8 1.2 1.6 .5 1.1

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .5 2.2 .8 1.4 .4 1.0

 Q4... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000: Q1... 1.3 .6 .6 .2 .5 3.0 1.5 1.5 .4 1.1

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.2 .9 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 1.9 .7 1.2 .2 1.0

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001: Q1... 1.7 1.0 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.2 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q2... 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .4 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2008-4)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2008 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2008 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.199. 
The fourth quarter 2008 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.550. The fourth quarter 
2008 RCAF-5 is 0.520.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. 
[Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-
800-877-8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site http://www.stb.dot.gov. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: September 18, 2008.

    By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Anne K. Quinlan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22495 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZResources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Edward G. Caminos, as Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Edward G. Caminos* | * * |
|-------------------------|----------|
| Edward G. Caminos       |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 10, 2008  |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dynamic Network Services, Inc.

Plaintiff

vs. No. 06-cv-37-

Timothy 1. Wilde

Defendant

STIPULA TION FOR DISMISSAL

NOW COME the parties, by their attorneys, and stipulate pursuant to F.RC.

41 (a)( 1 )(ii) with orei udice. Each party is to bear its

own costs and attorneys' fees.

Respectfully submitted

Defendant

TIMOTHY WILDE

Plaintiff,

DYNAMIC NETWORK SERVICES, INC.

By his attorneys By its attorneys

sf Lawrence M. Edelman

Lawrence M. Edelman N.H. Bar #: 738

Pease International Tradeport

One New Hampshire Avenue

Suite 350

Portsmouth, NH 03801

(603) 433-6300

ledelman~pierceatwood. com

sf Christopher Cole

Christopher Cole, NH Bar #: 8725

1000 Elm Street

PO Box 3701

Manchester, NH 03105-3701

(603) 627-8223

ccole~sheehan. com

Dated: August 30 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00037-JM Document 13 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
214 La. 709

#### STATE v. HAMM et al.

No. 39080.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1948.

Booth, Lockard & Jack, of Shreveport, for défendants-appellants.

Bolivar E.'-Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. H Culliga’n, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Edwin L. Blewer, D’ist. Atty. and John A. Richardson, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport, for appellee.

MOISE, Justice. '

The defendants herein were charged with having committed “the crime of gambling”', which is defined by Article 90 of the Louisiana .Criminal Code. From the judgment of their conviction and respective sentences, they have appealed.

The defendants urge in particular one bill of exception. This bill, even if if had merit, is of no value, because the defendants, having failed to file a motion for a new trial and to exhaust their remedies in the district court by submitting for review the rulings there made and complained of, before appealing to this Court, have not in conformity with the law placed themselves in a position to obtain relief. Article 559, Code of Criminal Procedure; State v. Stinson, 174 La. 510, 141 So. 44; State v. Eubanks, 179 La. 92, 153 So. 31; State v. Stephens, 183 La. 431, 164 So. 162 and State v. White, 195 La. 1028, 197 So. 745.

For the reasons assigned, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

O’NIELL C. J., concurs in the decree and assigns reasons.

O’NIELL, C. J.,

(concurring).

Although there are expressions in the opinion rendered in State v. Cooley, 185 La. 1032, 171 So. 435, which are not quite reconcilable with the ruling in the present case, as a matter of fact the decree rendered in the Cooley case was not a departure from the provisions of article 559 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The article'provides merely that no-new trial can be granted on appeal unless a motion for a new trial was made and refused in the court below. In Cooley’s case this court did not grant a new trial, but found that the sentence which had been imposed upon Cooley was erroneous, being in excess of the maximum sentence allowed by the statute. We, therefore, merely set aside the sentence and remanded the case for the defendant to be sentenced according to law.

In State v. Richard, 203 La. 722, 14 So.2d 615, the defendant, appellant, was convicted of murder and sentenced to suffer the death penalty. The State moved to dismiss his appeal because of the failure of his attorney to exhaust his remedies in the lower court by applying for a new trial. This court declined to dismiss the appeal, but considered the bills of exception on their merits, for no other reason than that the case was one in which the death sen*395tence had been pronounced; There is no such reason why we should decline to enforce article 559 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in this case, where the defendants, appellants, were charged with and convicted of a misdemeanor, gambling, and were sentenced accordingly.

With this explanation I concur in the decree rendered in this case.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

__________________________________________

)

Scott Kimball )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

) 1:08-cv-154-JM

Bonk Air Transport, Inc. )

)

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and Local Rule 41.1, plaintiff Scott Kimball, 

and defendant Bonk Air Transport, Inc. hereby stipulate that all claims in this action shall be, and 

hereby are, dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Bonk Air Transport, Inc.

By Its Attorneys,

SHAHEEN & GORDON, P.A.

March 11, 2009 By: /s/ Karyn P. Forbes #834_

Karyn P. Forbes, Esq.

NH Bar No. 834

107 Storrs Street

P.O. Box 2703

Concord, NH 03302-2703

(603) 225-7262

Respectfully submitted,

Scott Kimball,

By His Attorneys,

NIXON, RAICHE, VOGELMAN, BARRY & 

SLAWSKY, P.A.

March 11, 2009 By: /s/ David P. Slawsky #6591

NH BarNo. 6591

77 Central Street

Manchester, NH 03101

(603) 669-7070

Case 1:08-cv-00154-JL Document 15 Filed 03/11/09 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL was

served on this 11th day of March 2009, and in the manner specified herein:

Electronically Served Through ECF:

David P. Slawsky, Esq., slawsky@comcast.net

March 11, 2009 By: /s/ Karyn P. Forbes, #834

Karyn P. Forbes, Esq.

New Hampshire Bar No. 834

Case 1:08-cv-00154-JL Document 15 Filed 03/11/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                       GEOTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME
                     PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Quarter Ended March 31,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                       1997              1996
                                                   ------------       ----------
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>      
Historical - Primary:
   Weighted average common stock
      outstanding ...........................       13,086,372        2,315,846
   Cheap stock(1) ...........................             --            850,595
   Weighted average common stock
      equivalents ...........................          682,747        8,389,820

    Weighted average number of common
      and common equivalent shares
      outstanding ...........................     ------------      -----------
                                                    13,769,119       11,556,261
                                                  ============     ============

Net income ..................................     $        725     $         45
Less: accretion of redeemable convertible 
  preferred stock to redemption value .......               --              (27)
                                                  ------------      -----------

Net income available to common
  shareholders ..............................     $        725     $         18
                                                  ============     ============

Net income per common and common
equivalent shares ...........................     $       0.05     $       0.00
                                                  ============     ============
</TABLE>


-----------------------------------

(1)  In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
     Bulletin No. 83, issuances of common stock, common stock equivalents and
     Convertible Preferred Stock within one year prior of the initial filing of
     the registration statement, at share prices below the assumed initial
     public offering price of $12.00 per share are considered to have been made
     in anticipation of the contemplated public offering. Accordingly, these
     stock issuances are treated as if issued and outstanding, using the
     treasury stock method for options, since inception of the Company.

(2)  Fully diluted net income per share is not presented as it is the same as
     that disclosed in historical net income per share for the periods
     presented.
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated 

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 346,496 30,671 87,540 101,270 17,264 13,594 22,325 

Number of loans 16,832 2,272 3,713 5,154 732 339 762 

Weighted average maturity (months)1 62.10 9.71 89.95 37.92 139.87 56.66 19.41 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 14.40 2.91 6.61 13.34 8.83 .40 3.21 

Weighted average risk rating3 2.58 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.53 6.11 6.08 6.96 6.20 7.05 6.20 

 Standard error5 .15 .48 .20 .19 .49 .50 .52 

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 7.49 7.19 6.66 7.61 6.17 7.76 6.36 

 25th percentile 5.62 5.06 5.25 6.25 5.51 5.64 5.50 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.20 5.57 5.48 8.52 n.a. n.a. n.a

 Other livestock 7.05 6.19 n.a. 7.53 7.02 6.90 7.89 

 Other current operating expenses7 6.46 6.23 6.40 6.57 7.74 6.29 6.05 

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.98 7.37 7.00 7.34 11.61 n.a. 6.07 

 Farm real estate 6.41 n.a. 5.81 6.69 n.a. n.a. 6.60 

 Other8 6.61 7.00 6.99 7.22 5.68 7.76 7.20 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 55.43 59.91 58.25 56.63 83.94 95.46 72.22 

 Under commitment 40.09 81.90 44.08 39.54 34.18 31.68 15.14 

 Callable 15.21 16.36 5.27 23.90 1.50 29.22 .58 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 10.28 34.06 15.09 5.63 n.a. n.a. n.a

 Other livestock 6.48 18.27 2.96 10.38 .90 3.67 2.04 

 Other current operating expenses7 44.13 37.66 49.60 51.55 22.87 46.47 58.56 

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.22 9.86 .92 14.48 .65 n.a. 24.28 

 Farm real estate 19.20 n.a. 31.18 8.13 n.a. n.a. 11.29 

 Other8 10.70 .16 .25 9.83 75.58 49.86 3.84 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 32.40 6.53 39.61 21.91 58.27 61.43 4.85 

 Other 64.34 92.10 55.09 76.65 40.12 29.00 94.80 

 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
Exhibit 10.4


 


EXHIBIT A


INCENTIVE COMPENSATION SCHEDULE


CEO BONUS COMPENSATION


	
  PART I — BONUS

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2004/05

  	
   

  	
  For 2004 and 2005 (and any
  Renewal Term), Executive shall be entitled to a bonus equal to .825% of
  EBITDA if Company’s ROA is in the top 1/2 of public homebuilders having
  revenues of $500 million or more per year, and an additional .825% of EBITDA
  if the Company’s ROA is in the top one-half of these public builders.  If either measurement falls within the 33%
  to 49% percentile, the bonus shall be .5363% of EBITDA for the applicable
  measurement.  If either measurement
  falls below the 33% threshold, then there will not be any formula bonus paid
  with respect to such measurement.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1384 CAF 11-01371 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KAREN MATTESON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
KAREN L. MEINHOLD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------ IN THE MATTER OF KAREN MATTESON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V
ROBERT F. MEINHOLD, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

HOGANWILLIG, PLLC, BUFFALO (KENNETH A. OLENA OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. LAW OFFICES OF JAWORSKI & GIACOBBE, CHEEKTOWAGA (DAVID V. JAWORSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT KAREN L. MEINHOLD.
PAMELA THIBODEAU, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR DONALD M., ALEXANDRA M., CHRISTOPHER M. AND VICTORIA M.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, A.J.), entered December 9, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, dismissed the petitions seeking visitation. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the amended decision at Family Court.

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1 )       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2 )       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Manuel Pablo   Zúñiga-Pflücker* |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Manuel   Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker       |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
| May 16,   2011                                 |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Shirley Brouillard

v. Civil No. 07-cv-367-SM

US Social Security Administration

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge 

Date: November 9, 2007

cc: Raymond J. Kelly, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00367-SM Document 3 Filed 11/09/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1853

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend enterprise

communities for the same period as empowerment zones.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

enterprise communities for the same period as empowerment zones.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY

4 TREATMENT THROUGH 2009.

5 Subparagraph (A) of section 1391(d)(1) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to period for which

7 designation is in effect) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(A) December 31, 2009,’’.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22647]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 19, 2008.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 27, 
2008 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0119.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Certification of Proper Cellar Treatment for Imported 
Natural Wine.
     Description: TTB is requiring importers of natural wine to certify 
compliance with proper cellar treatment standards. This certification 
is necessary to comply with statutory requirements.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 6,600 hours.
    OMB Number: 1513-0092.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Marks on Wine Containers, TTB REC 5120/3.
     Description: TTB requires that wine on wine premises be identified 
by statements of information on labels or contained in marks. TTB uses 
this information to validate the receipts of excise tax revenue by the 
Federal government.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1 hour.
    Clearance Officer: Frank Foote (202) 927-9347, Alcohol and Tobacco 
Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Robert Dahl,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-22647 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
```