Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices 55823 

Municipal Ferry Building (existing Los 

Angeles Maritime Museum) at the foot 

of 6th Street and would incorporate a 

portion of the downtown promenade. 

Downtown Civic Fountain—The 

Downtown Civic Fountain would be 

adjacent to the Town Square. The water 

feature would be designed to 

complement the civic setting of the 

adjacent San Pedro City Hall Building 

and the Town Square, and simulate the 

extension of the 7th Street Harbor to the 

San Pedro City Hall Building. 

John S. Gibson Jr. Park—John S. 

Gibson Jr. Park is an existing 1.61-acre 

park located south of the 5th Street 

green. The intent is to maintain the 

existing memorials at the park and 

enhance their surroundings to highlight 

their historical and cultural significance 

with improved hardscape, landscaping, 

lighting, and interpretive signage 

elements. 

Fishermen’s Park—The proposed 

Fishermen’s Park would encompass 

approximately 3 acres within Ports 

O’Call. 

Outer Harbor Park—The proposed 

Outer Harbor Park would encompass 

approximately 6 acres at the Outer 

Harbor and would be designed as an 

integral feature and complementary to 

the secure operations of the proposed 

Outer Harbor Cruise Terminals. 

San Pedro Park—The proposed San 

Pedro Park would encompass 18 acres 

located north of 22nd Street, south of 

Crescent Avenue, and west of Sampson 

Way. 

Warehouses Nos. 9 and 10 and 

associated backland area—Adapt the 

area for low-intensity communityserving commercial or educational reuse 

that would be incorporated as an 

integral element of San Pedro Park. 

New Development, Redevelopment, 

Cultural Attractions, and Modifications 

to Existing Tenants, Including 

Development of the New Cruise 

Terminals 

Cruise Terminals—Upgrade Berths 

45–47 for use as a cruise ship berth 

including terminal construction, and 

construct a new cruise ship berth and 

terminal at Berths 49–50 in the Outer 

Harbor. 

Cruise Terminal Parking—The 

proposed upgrades to Berths 45–47 and 

new cruise ship terminal, the 

construction of a new cruise berth and 

terminal facility at Berths 49–50 in the 

Outer Harbor, and projected increases in 

ship calls and passengers at Berths 91– 

93 would require additional parking 

facilities. The parking for the combined 

cruise ship facilities would be located in 

the Inner Harbor and Outer Harbor. 

Ports O’Call Redevelopment— 

Redevelop and construct new 

commercial development within Ports 

O’Call Village. The redevelopment and 

additional development at Ports O’Call 

would require an increase in parking 

spaces. Parking would be provided at a 

number of locations within the Port and 

near Ports O’Call. 

Tug Operations—Renew leases and 

construct two new 10,000-square-foot 

buildings around the North Harbor for 

both Crowley and Millennium tug boats. 

Dispatching of tugs varies from day to 

day, and the impacts associated with 

tugboat operations are or will be 

accounted for in the respective projects 

that utilize tugboats. 

Los Angeles Maritime Institute 

(LAMI)—Issue a new lease and reuse the 

Crowley Building in the Downtown 

Harbor area for LAMI. 

Berth 240 Fueling Station—A new 

fueling station would be developed at 

Berth 240 on Terminal Island (i.e., along 

the east side of the Main Channel). 

Catalina Express Terminal and SS 

Lane Victory—Permanently relocate the 

Catalina Express Terminal berthing 

facilities from Berths 95–96 to the 

existing location of the S.S. Lane 

Victory at Berth 94. S.S. Lane Victory 

would be relocated to the North Harbor 

water cut. 

Transportation Improvements 

Sampson Way—This road would be 

expanded to two lanes in each direction 

and curve near the Municipal Fish 

Market to meet with 22nd Street in its 

westward alignment east of Miner 

Street. The proposed construction 

would also include an enhanced fourway intersection at Sampson Way and 

7th Street to provide improved access to 

and along the waterfront. 

Harbor Boulevard—This road would 

remain in place at its current capacity 

with two lanes in each direction. 

Landscaping and hardscape 

improvements are proposed along the 

east side and west side of Harbor 

Boulevard south of 7th Street, as well as 

in the median of Harbor Boulevard 

starting at the Swinford Street 

intersection, and would extend south to 

22nd Street. 

The Waterfront Red Car Line—This 

line would be extended from its existing 

terminus near the intersection of Harbor 

Boulevard and Miner Street and 22nd 

Street to City Dock No. 1 (adjacent to 

Warehouse No. 1), to the Outer Harbor 

along Miner Street, and to Inner Cabrillo 

Beach along Shoshonean Road. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions or comments concerning the 

Draft EIS/EIR should be directed to Dr. 

Spencer D. MacNeil, U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers, Los Angeles District, 

Regulatory Division, Ventura Field 

Office, 2151 Alessandro Drive, Suite 

110, Ventura, CA 93001, (805) 585– 

2152. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Port 

of Los Angeles and U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers will jointly hold a public 

hearing to receive public comments and 

to assess pubic concerns regarding the 

Draft EIS/EIR and project on October 27, 

2008 starting at 6 p.m. in the Crowne 

Plaza Hotel in San Pedro (601 S. Palos 

Verdes Street). Written comments will 

be accepted until the close of public 

review on December 8, 2008. 

David J. Castanon, 

Chief, Regulatory Division, Los Angeles 

District. 

[FR Doc. E8–22641 Filed 9–25–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–KF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before October 

27, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10222, 

Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are 

encouraged to submit responses 

electronically by e-mail to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax 

to (202) 395–6974. Commenters should 

include the following subject line in 

their response ‘‘Comment: [insert OMB 

number], [insert abbreviated collection 

name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound 

Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting 

comments electronically should not 

submit paper copies. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55824 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The IC Clearance 

Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, publishes that notice 

containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g., new, revision, extension, existing 

or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary 

of the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

Dated: September 22, 2008. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: New Collection. 

Title: Mapping the Adopted Core 

Curriculum in the Mid Atlantic Region. 

Frequency: On Occasion. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 1,496. 

Burden Hours: 748. 

Abstract: It is important to identify 

adopted LEA curricula in language arts/ 

literacy, mathematics and science to 

map the landscape of the Mid-Atlantic 

region and to inform policy and practice 

data-driven decision-making. After 

collecting information from interviews 

with key LEA staff from each REL MidAtlantic district, the lab will produce a 

foundational database from which to 

analyze trends and strategically develop 

appropriate research and evaluation 

agendas. A descriptive report 

summarizing the adopted K–12 

curricula in the region and a userfriendly on-line interface will also be 

developed. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 3768. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed 

to 202–401–0920. Please specify the 

complete title of the information 

collection when making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be electronically mailed to 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 

800–877–8339. 

[FR Doc. E8–22640 Filed 9–25–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Amended Record of Decision for the 

Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use 

Plan Environmental Impact Statement 

AGENCY: Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Amended record of decision. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy 

(DOE) is amending its Record of 

Decision (ROD) for the Hanford 

Comprehensive Land-Use Plan 

Environmental Impact Statement (HCP– 

EIS) (DOE/EIS–0222; September 1999), 

which evaluated the potential 

environmental impacts associated with 

implementing a comprehensive landuse plan (CLUP) for the Hanford Site 

near Richland, Washington. The CLUP 

consists of four key elements: (i) A landuse map that addresses the Hanford Site 

as five geographic areas and shows the 

planned future uses for each area, (ii) a 

set of nine land-use designations that 

define the permissible activities for each 

use, (iii) land-use planning policies, and 

(iv) implementing procedures that apply 

to the review and approval of future 

land uses. These elements were 

developed to ensure consistency in 

land-use decisionmaking and 

application of DOE institutional 

controls to the Site. The ROD (64 FR 

61615; November 12, 1999) adopted the 

CLUP for at least the next 50 years. 

In amending the 1999 ROD, DOE 

seeks to clarify two points: that when 

considering land-use proposals, DOE 

will use regulatory processes in addition 

to the implementing procedures in 

Chapter 6 of the HCP–EIS to ensure 

consistency with CLUP land-use 

designations, and that DOE will 

continue to apply the process under 

HCP–EIS Chapter 6 to modify or amend 

the CLUP, as needed. 

The CLUP will remain in effect as 

long as DOE retains legal control of 

some portion of the Hanford Site, which 

is expected to be longer than 50 years. 

As a ‘‘living document,’’ the CLUP is 

intended to be flexible enough to 

accommodate changes, both anticipated 

and unforeseen, in missions and 

conditions. The HCP–EIS recommends 

reassessment of the CLUP every 5 years 

through a Supplement Analysis process 

under the DOE National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing 

Procedures (10 CFR 1021.314). 

ADDRESSES: The documents referenced 

herein are available from: Center for 

Environmental Management 

Information, P.O. Box 23769, 

Washington, DC 20026–3769, 

Telephone: 800–736–3282 (in 

Washington, DC: 202–863–5084). 

The 1999 HCP–EIS and ROD are 

available, and the Supplement Analysis 

and this amended ROD will be 

available, at http://www.gc.energy.gov/ 

NEPA/ under ‘‘DOE NEPA Documents.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For further information on the 

Supplement Analysis for the HCP–EIS, 

contact: Mr. Woody Russell, NEPA 

Compliance Officer, U.S. Department of 

Energy, Office of River Protection, MS 

H6–60 P.O. Box 450, Richland, WA 

99352, Telephone: 509–373–5227. 

For information on DOE’s NEPA 

process, contact: Ms. Carol Borgstrom, 

Director, Office of NEPA Policy and 

Compliance (GC–20), U.S. Department 

of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, 

SW., Washington, DC 20585–0103, 

Telephone: 202–586–4600, or leave a 

message at 800–472–2756. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

DOE published a Notice of Intent 

(NOI) (57 FR 37959; August 21, 1992) to 

prepare the Hanford Remedial Action 

EIS and identified as an EIS objective 

the establishment of future land uses at 

the Hanford Site near Richland, 

Washington. After public scoping, DOE 

issued an Implementation Plan (DOE/ 

RL–93–66, June 1995) to document the 

recommendations of the Federal, state, 

and local agencies, Native American 

Tribes, and interested individuals and 

organizations, many of whom had been 

working with DOE to identify future use 

options for the Site. 

In response to new directives (DOE 

Order 430.1A, Life-Cycle Asset 

Management, and National Defense 

Authorization Act for FY97, 42 U.S.C. 

7274k, redesignated 50 U.S.C. 2582), 

DOE revised the scope of the EIS to 

prepare a comprehensive land-use plan 

for the Site. Seven cooperating agencies 

(Federal and local agencies) and two 

consulting Tribal governments 

developed alternatives analyzed in the 

EIS and helped develop the CLUP. In 

September 1996, DOE issued the Draft 

Hanford Remedial Action EIS and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES