alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         268,528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,528
<PP&E>                                          18,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          496,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,544,575
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,764,914)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,937
<SALES>                                         71,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,275
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               190,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,966
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,966
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 10-0430

IN RE ATHENA RASMUSSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief, filed June 7, 2010, is granted.  All trial court proceedings in Cause No. 343342, styled *George Sarran v. Athena Rasmusson,*in the County Court at Law No 3 of Bexar County, Texas, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real party in interest is requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., June 28, 2010.

3.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this June 16, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2105

To provide emergency market loss assistance for producers of red raspberries

for the processed market.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 7, 2001

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself and Mr. BAIRD) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To provide emergency market loss assistance for producers

of red raspberries for the processed market.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKET LOSS ASSISTANCE FOR PRODUCERS

4 OF RED RASPBERRIES FOR PROCESSED MAR5 KET.

6 (a) PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary of

7 Agriculture shall use $15,000,000 of funds of the Com8 modity Credit Corporation to make payments to producers

9 of the 2000 crop of red raspberries grown for the proc-
2

•HR 2105 IH

1 essed market to compensate such producers for loss of

2 markets for processed red raspberries.

3 (b) PAYMENT BASIS.—Subject to such other terms

4 and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate, a

5 payment under this section shall be made on the basis of

6 the quantity of the 2000 crop of red raspberries that was

7 produced on a farm unit and marketed for processing.

8 (c) PREVENTION OF DUPLICATIVE PAYMENTS.—The

9 Secretary shall take such actions as are necessary to en10 sure that payments made under this section do not dupli11 cate payments provided under other Federal programs for

12 the same loss, other than an indemnity provided under a

13 policy or plan of insurance offered under the Federal Crop

14 Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).

15 (d) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.—The entire amount

16 necessary to carry out this section shall be available only

17 to the extent that an official budget request for the entire

18 amount, that includes designation of the entire amount of

19 the request as an emergency requirement as defined in

20 the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act

21 of 1985, is transmitted by the President to the Congress.

22 The entire amount is designated by the Congress as an

23 emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)

24 of such Act.

Æ
<Page>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-47415, 33-17488, 33-60196, 333-18135 of The Dress Barn, Inc. on Form S-8 and
in Registration Statement No. 333-25377 on Form S-3 of The Dress Barn, Inc., of
our report relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule
of The Dress Barn, Inc. dated October 13, 2004 (March 18, 2005 as to the effects
of the restatement discussed in Note 2), which expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement to correct the
Company's accounting for construction allowances, rent holidays and scheduled
rent escalation clauses over the lease term under operating leases as described
in Note 2, appearing in this Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Dress
Barn, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2004.


/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
March 18, 2005


                                      F-26
II 

Calendar No. 612

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2099

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National Historic Reserve.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2099 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE. 

2 Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks 

3 and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 

4 461 note; 110 Stat. 4154) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and all that follows through the period and 

6 inserting ‘‘$15,000,000 for development costs associated 

7 with capital projects consistent with the cooperative man8 agement plan, except that the Federal share of such devel9 opment costs shall not exceed 50 percent of the total 

10 costs.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 

Calendar No. 612

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2099

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 

Management Act of 1996 to provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National Historic Reserve. 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-11-PB

Joseph Delgado, et al.

O R D E R

Defendant Rupert Pamphile, through counsel, has moved to

continue the trial scheduled for June 2, 2009, citing the need

for additional time to finalize plea negotiations. The

government and co-defendants do not object to a continuance of

the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 2, 2009 to July 7, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00011-PB Document 34 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 26, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

June 29, 2009 at 3:45 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 26, 2009

cc: Michael Ramsdell, Esq.

Liam D. Scully, Esq.

John Pendleton, Esq.

Ray Raimo, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00011-PB Document 34 Filed 05/26/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven H. Crowell

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00295-JL

Canam Steel Corporation

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

September 15, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00295-JL Document 28 Filed 09/08/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 8, 2008 

cc: John P. Sherman, Esq.

Martha Van Oot, Esq.

Lisa Snow Wade, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00295-JL Document 28 Filed 09/08/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-135116 as amended, 333-125978, 333-122785, 333-107160, 333-100472, 333-81524, 333-13102, 333-07636, 033-35332, and 033-04813) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated June 7, 2007,
relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form
20-F.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AB                            
|PricewaterhouseCoopers AB  Stockholm, Sweden June 7,
2007
Case 1:08-mj-00088-JM   Document 3   Filed 09/05/08   Page 1 of 1
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2001: Q3... 1.66 .09 .13 1.09 .12 .23 1.00 .36 .23 .08  Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Tom Cossette

V .

Angela Poulin, et al .

No . 06-fp-34 7

O R D E R

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U .S .C . § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows : the sum of $10 .00 is due no later than

October 20, 2006 . In addition, 20% of each preceding month's

income credited to plaintiff's account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10 .00 until the sum of $350 .00 has been paid . Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice . In all other respects plaintiff's request for in

forma pauperis has been granted .

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-347-JD .

SO ORDERED .

Date : September 18, 2006

me'& R . Muirhead

States Magistrate Judg e

cc : Tom Cossette, pro s e

Bonnie S . Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:06-cv-00347-JL Document 3 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
ACUSON CORPORATION                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


Acuson Corporation has the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:

   1.  Acuson Pty. Ltd., organized under the laws of Australia.
   2.  Acuson GesmbH, organized under the laws of Austria.
   3.  Acuson Belgium SA/NV, organized under the laws of Belgium.
   4.  Acuson Canada Ltd., organized under the laws of Ontario, Canada.
   5.  Acuson A/S, organized under the laws of Denmark.
   6.  Acuson OY, organized under the laws of Finland.
   7.  Acuson S.A.R.L., organized under the laws of France.
   8.  Acuson GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany.
   9.  Acuson Hong Kong Ltd., organized under the laws of Hong Kong.
  10.  Acuson S.p.A., organized under the laws of Italy.
  11.  Acuson Nippon K.K., organized under the laws of Japan.
  12.  Acuson BV, organized under the laws The Netherlands.
  13.  Acuson A/S, organized under the laws of Norway.
  14.  Acuson Singapore Ltd., organized under the laws of Singapore.
  15.  Acuson Iberica SA, organized under the laws of Spain.
  16.  Acuson AB, organized under the laws of Sweden.
  17.  Acuson Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.
  18.  Acuson Foreign Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the Virgin
       Islands.
  19.  Acuson International Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the
       State of California.
  20.  Acuson Worldwide Sales Corporation, organized under the laws of the State
       of California.
  21.  Sound Technology, Inc., organized under the laws of the State of
       Pennsylvania.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Timothy Mlodzinski, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00289-JL

Michael F. Lewis, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

October 29, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00289-JL Document 15 Filed 10/22/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 22, 2008

cc: Matthew J. Lahey, Esq.

Charles P. Bauer, Esq.

William G. Scott, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00289-JL Document 15 Filed 10/22/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dino N. Theodore,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 08-cv-343-SM

327 South Broadway, LLC,

Defendant

O R D E R

Re: (Document No. 16) Motion for Leave to Withdraw

Ruling: Denied. The motion does not directly address what

might (or might not) qualify as adequate grounds upon which to

permit withdrawal at this stage of the litigation. See generally

Gibbs v. Lappies, 828 F.Supp. 6 (D.N.H. 1993). Indeed, the

motion suggests that if counsel were to withdraw, the client will

be materially prejudiced. The motion does, however, raise

potentially dispositive issues in that the circumstances

described suggest that the claims made by plaintiff might be

moot. The plaintiff shall show cause, by legal memorandum, filed

within 30 days of the date of this order, why the complaint

seeking prospective and discretionary equitable relief should not

be dismissed as moot. So ordered.

______________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

June 18, 2009

cc: Nicholas S. Guerrera, Esq.

Jennifer T. Beaudet, Esq.

Thomas J. Pappas, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00343-SM Document 17 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Benjamin and

DLC Services Corp.,

Plaintiffs

v. Civil No. 08-cv-422-SM

Riley, More & More Enterprises, LLC,

176 Webster Street, LLC,

New England All Star Consulting, LLC,

Mile High Real Estate, LLC,

Linda Haytayan, and Vatche Manoukian

Defendants

O R D E R

Re: (Document No. 141), Motion for Reconsideration

Ruling: To the extent the motion seeks reconsideration of

the decision overruling plaintiffs' objection to legal counsel

appearing on behalf of defendants, it is denied. To the extent

the motion alludes to alleged discovery issues and perceived

prejudice, it must be noted that no motion seeking relief on

those grounds (other than a request to deny defendants legal

representation) is pending, and, it must also be noted that

plaintiffs' counsel represented that plaintiffs did not wish a

continuance due to legal counsel's recent appearance, and alleged

outstanding discovery issues complicated by bankruptcy filings

and failures to keep this court informed of the bankruptcy

petition's dismissal, but, rather, desired to, and were prepared

to, proceed to trial promptly, which desire was accommodated.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: May 19, 2010

cc: Jay J. Friedrich, Esq.

Jeffrey A. Zall, Esq.

Christopher J. Pyles, Esq.

Linda Haytayan, pro se

Vatche Manoukian, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00422-SM Document 142 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________

)

ESTATE OF ESTHER KLIEMAN, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1173 (PLF)

)

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that [Dkt. No. 233] defendants’ motion for reconsideration of Court’s 

December 29, 2006 and April 24, 2008 interlocutory orders on personal jurisdiction is 

GRANTED; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the PA and the PLO be dismissed from this case 

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of this Court’s dismissal of the sole 

remaining defendants in this case, this case is dismissed with prejudice; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that all currently pending motions in this case are denied 

as moot.

SO ORDERED.

/s/________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: March 3, 2015 United States District Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

 JUDGE PHILIP A. BRIMMER

 COURTROOM MINUTES

Courtroom Deputy: Kathy Preuitt-Parks

Court Reporter: Janet Coppock

Probation Officer: Sergio Garza

Date: February 17, 2012 

Time: 27 minutes

Interpreter: Marcella Salazar

CASE NO. 11-CR-00343-PAB

Parties Counsel

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lillian Alves

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOEL MELKIN BANEGAS-PACHECO, Edward Pluss

Defendant.

SENTENCING

9:03 a.m. COURT IN SESSION

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Defendant is present and in custody.

Interpreter sworn with no challenges to her/his qualifications.

ORDERED: The statement of facts in the Plea Agreement and the Presentence Report

are not disputed by the parties and are adopted in the Court's factual findings in this case.

The report is incorporated by reference as part of the Court’s findings and conclusions.
Page Two

11-CR-00343-PAB

February 17, 2012

ORDERED: Defendant’s Amended Objections to Presentence Investigation Report (Doc

#28), is WITHDRAWN.

ORDERED: United States’ Motion for 1-Level Variance in Defendant’s Offense Level for

Acceptance of Appellate Waiver (Doc #17), is GRANTED.

Argument by Mr. Pluss in support of defendant’s Motions for Non-Guideline Sentence and

comments addressing sentencing.

Argument by Ms. Alves and comments addressing sentencing.

Defendant addresses the Court.

Court states its findings and conclusions.

ORDERED: Defendant’s Motions for Non-Guideline Sentences (Docs #20 and 22), are

 DENIED.

Statement by the Court regarding defendant's offense level, criminal history level and

sentencing guidelines range.

Defendant entered his plea on November 1, 2011 to the one count Indictment. 

ORDERED: Court ACCEPTS the Plea Agreement.

Court considers statutory factors of 18 USC § 3553(a) in arriving at sentence.

ORDERED: Defendant shall be imprisoned for 51 months.

ORDERED: Defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the

defendant as directed by the probation officer. 

Defendant is advised that if he enters or remains in the United States illegally, possesses

a firearm or illegally possesses a controlled substance, he/she may be subject to further

federal prosecutions.

ORDERED: Defendant advised of right to appeal. To the extent to which the defendant

has waived some appellate rights, he is directed to consult with the plea

agreement and his attorney.
Page Three

11-CR-00343-PAB

February 17, 2012

ORDERED: A copy of the presentence report shall be forwarded to the U.S. Bureau of

Prisons and the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

ORDERED: Defendant is REMANDED to the custody of the U.S. Marshal.

9:30 a.m. COURT IN RECESS

Total in court time: 17 minutes

Hearing concluded