alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008...... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

2009...... 100.0 68.4 24.8 5.8 .8 .2 .0

2010...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 83.6 14.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008: Q1... 100.0 81.0 15.5 2.9 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 78.2 17.5 3.5 .6 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

2009: Q1... 100.0 69.9 23.6 5.6 .7 .2 .1

 Q2... 100.0 67.9 25.0 5.9 1.0 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 67.1 25.5 6.3 1.1 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 68.4 24.8 5.8 .8 .2 .0

2010: Q1... 100.0 65.8 26.4 6.8 .9 .2 .0

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1999
<CASH>                                     106,952,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,950,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (723,000)
<INVENTORY>                                501,040,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           651,670,000
<PP&E>                                     450,156,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (197,935,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             941,635,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      318,911,000
<BONDS>                                     52,970,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    49,612,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 498,554,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               941,635,000
<SALES>                                  1,988,513,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,005,696,000
<CGS>                                    1,278,717,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,278,717,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           637,090,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             7,978,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,771,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             76,140,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                28,357,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         47,783,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                47,783,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
#### Miller *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24721

— Decided May 31, 1934.)

*Mr. Milton Firestone*and *Mr. Ben E. Zwick,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Frank T. Gullitam,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Anthony A. Butkowski,*for defendant in error.

It appearing to the court that a motion for leave to file a petition in error herein has been heretofore overruled by this court, and that thereafter said plaintiff in error filed a petition in error as of right claiming a *387constitutional question is involved; and this court having considered said petition in error and being fully advised in the premises, it is now ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, *sua sponte*dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis, Zimmerman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12,
1997 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-12-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          90,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,028<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,866<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,908
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,105
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (686)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<FN>
<F1>AS A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OUR BALANCE SHEET IS NOT
CLASSIFIED.
<F2>INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL, UNEARNED COMPENSATION,
NOTE RECEIVABLE FROM STOCK SALE AND RETAINED EARNINGS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 872 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 872

Recognizing the ongoing work of The United States Sweet Potato Council 
  and expressing support for designation of a ``Sweet Potato Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2007

 Mr. Wicker submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the ongoing work of The United States Sweet Potato Council 
  and expressing support for designation of a ``Sweet Potato Month''.

Whereas proper diet and nutrition are important factors in preventing diseases;
Whereas evidence indicates that eating fruits and vegetables, including sweet 
        potatoes, daily as part of a healthy diet will improve health and 
        protect against diseases such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, high 
        blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity;
Whereas sweet potatoes contain high quality protein and high levels of the 
        phytonutrient, beta carotene;
Whereas sweet potatoes also contain high fiber, folate, Potassium, Vitamin A, 
        Vitamin B6, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, and Vitamin K;
Whereas United States sweet potato farms yielded more than 1,600,000,000 pounds 
        of sweet potatoes in 2006;
Whereas sweet potato production represents an important sector of the 
        agriculture industry;
Whereas the sweet potato industry contributes approximately $300,000,000 to the 
        United States economy and employs thousands of people;
Whereas sweet potatoes are grown in 36 states, are purchased and consumed in all 
        50 states, and are exported, in fresh or processed from, to many 
        countries, including Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, 
        Greece, Honduras, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, 
        Singapore, Spain, and the United Kingdom; and
Whereas The United States Sweet Potato Council has been the only National 
        organization advocating for increased consumption of sweet potatoes: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the work of The United States Sweet Potato 
        Council; and
            (2) supports the designation of a ``Sweet Potato Month''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
                    RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Feuer, Chief Financial Officer of SPO Medical Inc. (the "Company"),
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2005.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's 2005 fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: April 11, 2006

                                                /s/ Jeffrey Feuer
                                                -----------------
                                                Jeffery Feuerer
                                                Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 875 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2008.
Whereas Mr. William A. Hadley, a high school teacher who lost his vision at the 
        age of 55, and ophthalmologist Dr. E.V.L. Brown first welcomed students 
        to the Hadley School for the Blind in 1920;
Whereas the Hadley School for the Blind's mission is to promote independent 
        living through lifelong, distance education programs for blind people, 
        their families and blindness service providers;
Whereas over the past 87 years, the Hadley School has grown to have an annual 
        enrollment of more than 10,000 students from all 50 states and 100 
        countries;
Whereas the Hadley School for the Blind has a high school degree program, an 
        adult continuing study program, and in 2008 will be launching the Hadley 
        School for Professional Studies;
Whereas the Hadley School for the Blind offers a wide range of distance 
        education courses for blind or visually impaired individuals who are at 
        least 14 years of age, relatives of blind or visually impaired children, 
        family members of blind or visually impaired adults, and professionals 
        in the blindness field;
Whereas there are more than 90 courses offered in Braille, large print, 
        audiocassette, and online and students study in their own homes, at 
        their own pace, completely free of charge; and
Whereas student Christie Gilson is bridging cultural boundaries by teaching 
        visually impaired Chinese students English online: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the important and positive impact the Hadley School for 
        the Blind has had on the lives of thousands of visually impaired people 
        across the globe; and
            (2) supports their mission to promote independent living through 
        lifelong, distance education programs for blind people, their families 
        and blindness service providers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, - <br><br>against<br><br>Damon Joyner, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Sandra Elena Roper, J.), rendered July 5, 2018, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Sandra Elena Roper, J.), rendered July 5, 2018, affirmed.</p><p>Defendant's claim that his plea was coerced as a result of the prosecutor's "overcharge" of the case is unpreserved for our review, since he did not make an appropriate postallocution motion (<i>see People v Conley</i>, 135 AD3d 1238, 1239 [2016]), and this claim does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement, inasmuch as defendant did not make any statements during the plea colloquy that cast doubt upon his guilt or otherwise called into question the voluntariness of his plea (<i>see People v Cajigas</i>, 123 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2014]). We decline to review the claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that defendant's unsupported claim of coercion is belied by the record, which reflects that the plea was entered in a knowing, intelligent and voluntary manner with the assistance of counsel. In any event, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the accusatory instrument rather than vacatur of the plea, and he expressly requests that this Court affirm the conviction if it does not grant a dismissal. Since we do not find that dismissal would be appropriate, we affirm on this basis as well (<i>see People v Vargas</i>, 162 AD3d 531 [2018]<i>, lv denied </i>32 NY3d 942 [2018]).</p><p>Defendant is not aggrieved by alleged defects in felony charges that were dismissed on the People's motion as part of the plea (<i>see </i>CPL 470.15[1]; <i>People v Ruiz</i>, 146 AD3d 417 [2017], <i>lv denied</i> 28 NY3d 1188 [2017]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: January 17, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

I, John Lackland, Interim Chief Financial Officer of Power EfficiencyCorporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.               the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company forthe quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 16, 2005

 
|   | BY:    | /s/ John Lackland          |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |   | John Lackland                   |
|   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separatedisclosure document.

----
Exhibit 15.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-180880) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-161683, 333-161684 and 333-196453) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated June 19, 2014 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of ST-Ericsson SA, which appears under Exhibit 15.1 in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                          |  |               
|------------------------- |  | --------------
|PricewaterhouseCoopers SA |  |               
|                          | 
|/s/ Claudia Benz          |  | /s/ Mike Foley
|Claudia Benz              |  | Mike Foley    
|Geneva, Switzerland       |  |               
|March 31, 2015            |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Rockwood and

Roxana Marchosky

v. Case No. 08-cv-168-PB

SKF USA Inc.

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case and direct the

clerk to assign the case to a different judge.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 19, 2010

cc: James W. Donchess, Esq.

Roxana Marchosky, Esq.

Deborah Ann Notinger, Esq.

Steven M. Notinger, Esq.

David Richman, Esq.

Gregory A. Moffett, Esq.

Matthew R. Williams, Esq.

Peter G. Callaghan, Esq.

Alexander J. Walker, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00168-JL Document 127 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Case 1:08-cv-00168-JL Document 127 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending December 28, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANQUE TRANSATLANTIQUE                                                                                                  FBSEABanque Transatlantique, Paris, France, to establish a representative office in Boston, Massachusetts, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(B)(3) of Regulation K.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicable
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2007...... 1.34 .09 .11 .90 .12 .13 .51 .38 .32 .14 2008...... 1.32 .07 .10 .91 .08 .15 .46 .38 .32 .16 2005: Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Q3... 1.25 .08 .08 .84 .12 .13 .49 .36 .28 .11  Q4... 1.37 .11 .15 .86 .10 .14 .50 .38 .34 .15 2008: Q1... 1.25 .09 .10 .83 .09 .13 .41 .36 .30 .18  Q2... 1.45 .07 .11 1.01 .10 .16 .54 .38 .36 .17  Q3... 1.22 .03 .08 .87 .09 .14 .45 .37 .28 .13  Q4... 1.38 .10 .12 .93 .06 .17 .46 .40 .36 .17 2009: Q1... 1.31 .09 .09 .89 .10 .15 .43 .36 .33 .19  Q2... 1.31 .08 .09 .91 .09 .13 .49 .37 .32 .13  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.