alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Office of Community Services

AGENCY: Office of Community Services, ACF, DHHS.

ACTION: Notice To Award a Program Expansion Supplement to the National 
Association for State Community Services Program (NASCSP) in 
Washington, DC.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    CFDA#: 53.570.
    Legislative Authority: Section 678A(a)(1)(A) of the Community 
Services Block Grant (CSBG) Act of 1981, (Pub. L. 97-35) as amended by 
the Community Opportunities, Accountability, and Training and 
Educational Services (COATES) Human Services Reauthorization Act of 
1998, (Pub. L. 105-285) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services (HHS) to use a percentage of appropriated funds for training, 
technical assistance, planning, evaluation, performance measurement, 
monitoring, assistance for States in carrying out corrective actions 
and the correction of programmatic deficiencies of eligible entities 
under the CSBG Act.
    Amount of Award: $125,000.
    Project Period: 9/30/2007-9/29/2010.
    Summary:
    The purpose of this supplemental request is for the NASCSP to 
further improve the general capacity and technical competency of states 
to administer the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG). Targeted 
assistance will be provided to states for improvement in the areas of 
state plan development and Results Oriented Management and 
Accountability (ROMA) focused monitoring. Emerging training and 
technical assistance needs for states and local agencies receiving CSBG 
funds will also be assessed and a plan will be developed for strategic 
assistance in the areas identified. Additionally, this supplemental 
aims to enhance the capacity of the Office of Community Services (OCS) 
to continue to convene its Monitoring Task Force (MTF) and provide 
updates on its comprehensive response to the Government Accountability 
Office's report on the CSBG program. Specific emphasis will be placed 
on monitoring states for compliance while encouraging excellence
    Contact for Further Information: Josephine B. Robinson, Director, 
Office of Community Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, 
DC 20047, Telephone: 202/401-9333.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Josephine B. Robinson,
Director, OCS.
[FR Doc. E8-22476 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 274,621 18,571 38,909 42,605 47,541 69,42Number of loans 8,860 3,584 2,716 1,266 695 45Weighted average maturity (months)1 32.56 11.70 13.70 16.82 27.00 38.8

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 14.84 6.08 7.59 9.84 15.77 16.4

Weighted average risk rating3 2.36 2.50 2.63 2.29 2.98 2.4

Weighted average interest rate4 6.29 6.84 6.48 6.71 6.49 5.6

 Standard error5 .21 .21 .14 .26 .28 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.00 7.64 7.39 7.79 7.00 6.0 25th percentile 5.50 6.08 5.74 5.33 5.65 5.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.89 6.34 5.83 7.16 7.46 5.1 Other livestock 6.19 5.93 6.61 6.27 6.93 5.5 Other current operating expenses7 6.08 6.73 6.56 6.65 6.07 5.2

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.16 8.44 6.62 7.31 6.79 7.4 Farm real estate 6.39 6.09 7.06 5.17 6.89 6.0 Other8 6.99 7.76 5.96 7.51 6.92 5.5

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 38.30 53.11 48.77 40.26 42.57 32.6 Under commitment 57.88 66.84 63.65 61.06 49.98 57.7 Callable 21.87 23.24 26.02 30.68 30.01 26.3 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 11.17 1.77 7.98 9.57 5.32 15.5 Other livestock 6.54 4.60 8.67 7.52 7.71 9.9 Other current operating expenses7 49.97 82.45 61.29 59.05 52.97 42.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.47 6.30 12.60 11.45 7.41 8.6 Farm real estate 13.67 .50 2.21 6.21 12.09 15.1 Other8 11.17 4.38 7.25 6.20 14.50 7.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 22.22 4.94 6.24 13.98 21.51 34.3 Other 76.45 87.19 90.99 83.41 78.49 65.6 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2056

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing deadline for

certain claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 2001

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mr. FROST, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. GONZALEZ, and Mr.

PITTS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing

deadline for certain claims under the National Vaccine

Injury Compensation Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vaccine Injury Com5 pensation Reform Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

7 The purpose of this Act is to prevent the unfair denial

8 of compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Com9 pensation Program to certain individuals who are diag-
2

HR 2056 IH

1 nosed as having vaccine-related injuries more than 36

2 months after the first symptom, manifestation of onset,

3 or signifcant aggravation of such injuries.

4 SEC. 3. REVISION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN

5 CLAIMS UNDER NATIONAL VACCINE INJURY

6 COMPENSATION PROGRAM.

7 Paragraph (2) of section 2116(a) of the Public

8 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–16(a)) is amended

9 by striking ‘‘no petition’’ and all that follows in such para10 graph and inserting the following: ‘‘no petition may be

11 filed for compensation under the Program for such injury

12 after the expiration of 36 months after the date on which

13 such injury is diagnosed, except that, if such injury is first

14 diagnosed before the date of the enactment of the Vaccine

15 Injury Compensation Reform Act, no petition may be filed

16 for compensation under the Program for such injury after

17 the expiration of 36 months after the latest of—

18 ‘‘(A) the date on which such injury is diag19 nosed,

20 ‘‘(B) the date of the occurrence of the first

21 symptom or manifestation of onset or of the

22 significant aggravation of such injury, or

23 ‘‘(C) the date of the enactment of the Vac24 cine Injury Compensation Reform Act, if such

25 injury is first diagnosed after the expiration of
3

HR 2056 IH

1 36 months after the date referred to in sub2 paragraph (B), and’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Warren Cook

v. Case No. 08-cv-11-PB

City of Laconia

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated June 5, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

July 10, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Warren Cook, Pro Se

Case 1:08-cv-00011-PB Document 6 Filed 07/11/08 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1766 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1766

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4270 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, as the ``Stan Parris Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4270 
John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Stan Parris Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan Parris Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
186 La. 503

#### UNION BLDG. CORPORATION v. BURMEISTER.

No. 34166.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1937.

O’Niell & O’Niell, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Anna Judge Veters, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal herein, on the ground that the transcript is not made in triplicate in conformity with the provisions of Act No. 80 of 1912.

The facts are, viz.: Certain exhibits (three promissory notes, three certified copies of acts of chattel mortgages, and three ledger sheets) were attached in their original form to one of the copies of the transcript and no copy of said exhibits was attached to either of the other two copies of the transcript. On November *76830, 1936, this case was advanced and placed on the preference docket on motion of ap-pellee. On December 30, 1936, appellant filed motion for permission to file supplemental transcript, which was granted by this court on that date, without prejudice. On the same day the transcript composed of triplicate photostatic copies of the said documents, with certificate of the clerk and deputy clerk of the lower court that same are true copies, and that the error was theirs, was filed. On January 4, 1937, the motion to dismiss was submitted to this court.

Act No. 234 of 1932 provides:

“Be it' enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana, That whenever an appellant files an incomplete transcript, or files the transcript or a further application for an extention, within three judicial days after the return day, or omits to file as part of the record any transcript exhibits offered in evidence, or whenever because of any error on the part of the Clerk of Court or of the trial judge, or for any purely technical reason,, a motion to dismiss his appeal is filed either by an appellee, third person or intervenor, charging and setting forth as grounds for dismissal any of the above reasons, no appellate court shall maintain said motion to dismiss, or dismiss the appeal, unless it first allow to the appellant at least two additional days, exclusive of Sundays and holidays, to cure and correct any and all the informalities and irregularities alleged and complained of in the motion to dismiss; and such appellant may, before the date on which the motion to dismiss is fixed for trial, cure and correct any objection, irregularity or informality charged or alleged to exist in the motion to dismiss, and if it appears to the appellate court that he has done so, the motion to dismiss shall be denied.”

Under the expressed terms of Act No. 234 of 1932, the appellant would have the right to file the supplemental transcript. The act provides that the appellate court shall, which is mandatory, deny the motion to dismiss if the appellant corrects the irregularity before the trial date of the motion. In other words, Act No. 234 of 1932 permits appellant to complete his transcript by complying with provisions of Act No. 80 of 1912.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss is refused.

O’NIELL, C. J., recused.
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q2... 40 47 13 9 59 32 27 5

 Q3... 52 41 7 20 59 21 47 4 Q4... 35 27 38 17 54 29 34 42007: Q1... 21 29 50 11 50 38 19 4 Q2... 10 39 51 4 55 41 7 5 Q3... 2 32 66 2 50 48 5 4 Q4... 2 12 86 2 28 71 2 22008: Q1... 0 10 90 0 32 68 1 1 Q2... 6 17 77 6 27 67 6 2

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q2... 37 57 6 15 60 25 37 5

 Q3... 42 48 10 15 54 31 31 5 Q4... 25 43 32 8 62 29 18 62007: Q1... 18 38 44 5 59 36 14 5 Q2... 13 49 39 7 55 38 12 5 Q3... 6 38 56 5 52 44 8 5 Q4... 7 25 68 5 47 48 7 32008: Q1... 7 25 68 5 36 59 7 3 Q2... 8 35 57 8 40 51 12 4

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2006: Q2... 35 48 17 17 65 17 32 5

 Q3... 23 55 23 5 86 9 23 5 Q4... 22 44 33 11 72 17 17 62007: Q1... 20 30 50 0 75 25 5 5 Q2... 10 15 75 5 70 25 10 4 Q3... 5 11 84 5 53 42 5 2 Q4... 5 0 95 11 42 47 11 22008: Q1... 5 29 67 10 43 48 14 2 Q2... 10 19 71 19 29 52 14 3 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Marc P. Applebaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 15, 2010





/s/ Marc P. ApplebaumMarc P. ApplebaumChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nelson Welshman

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00302-JL

Eric M. Brown, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

October 17, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 4) is approved as

submitted.

Based on the discussions between the court and

counsel/parties at the conference, the following is stricken

without prejudice to being reinstated on request if warranted by

the evidence: #12 (statute of limitations/laches).

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 21, 2008

cc: Michael S. Bowser, Jr., Esq.

Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00302-JL Document 6 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 3.01

                        FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY'S
                           AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

            On May 24, 2006, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the Company's
Board of Directors amended the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws (effective
June 1, 2006) so that Section 3.8 of such bylaws was amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

         "3.8     Quorum. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of
                  one-third (33(1)/3%) of all of the shares of the stock
                  entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or by
                  proxy, shall constitute a quorum for all purposes at any
                  meeting of the Stockholders. In the absence of a quorum at any
                  meeting or any adjournment thereof, the holders of a majority
                  of the shares of stock entitled to vote who are present, in
                  person or by proxy, or, in the absence therefrom of all the
                  Stockholders, any officer entitled to preside at, or to act as
                  secretary of, such meeting may adjourn such meeting to another
                  place, date or time.

                  If the chairman or the meeting gives notice of any adjourned
                  special meeting of Stockholders to all Stockholders entitled
                  to vote thereat, stating that the minimum percentage of
                  Stockholders for a quorum as provided by Nevada law shall
                  constitute a quorum, then, except as otherwise required by
                  law, that percentage at such adjourned meeting shall
                  constitute a quorum and a majority of the votes cast at such
                  meeting shall determine all matters."
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                 Estimated volume                Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      ______________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1996......    |           7       0      1        2        4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1      0        3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1      3        0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3        5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3        8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9        5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6        5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6        8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1      5        2       10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2     11        4        0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2      6        1       12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
2007......    |        n.a.      -3      0     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.     -.006      .000     n.a.     n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and statistical disclosures referenced within item
14(a)(1)(2) and item 1 of the Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements and statistical disclosures.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         206,223
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,928
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,091,400
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         528,388
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           538,218
<LOANS>                                      4,712,566
<ALLOWANCE>                                     65,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,841,337
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,233,165
<SHORT-TERM>                                   425,890
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            146,854
<LONG-TERM>                                    349,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,058
<OTHER-SE>                                     581,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,841,337
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                404,096
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               94,894
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,748
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               510,738
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             194,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             232,494
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          278,244
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,316
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,071
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                225,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                126,870
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      87,917
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.87
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,520
<LOANS-PAST>                                    33,062
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   489
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,347
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                56,256
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   17,277
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,485
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               65,091
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            65,091
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending December 24, 2005FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFirst Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.                                                                                         * 3A1First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., Farmington, Connecticut to become a bank holding company in connection with the reorganization of Farmington Savings Bank, Farmington, Connecticut into the mutual bank holding company structure.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableNORTHERN BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                  CICNotice pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act of 1978 by Joseph A. Riley who would become a member of a group of related family interests that currently owns greater than 25% of the voting shares of Northern Bancorp, Inc., Woburn, Massachusetts.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 01/03/2006