alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment #2 to Lease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THAT LEASE AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 2, 1999 BETWEEN RYAN OAKS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO SPIEKER PROPERTIES, L.P.), AS LANDLORD, AND EXCELLIGENCE LEARNING CORPORATION, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS LEARNINGSTAR CORPORATION, AS TENANT, FOR PREMISES LOCATED AT 2 LOWER RAGSDALE DRIVE, SUITE 125, MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA. 
  
 The above described Lease Agreement will be amended as follows to extend the Term Expiration Date. 
  

	1.	Paragraph 3 – Term: Scheduled Term Expiration Date: June 30, 2007. Tenant agrees to accept the premises in “as-is” condition. 

  
 Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease effective July 1, 2005,
provided all of the following conditions are met: 
  

	 	a.	Tenant is not, and has not been, in default of this Lease and shall be current in all obligations of this Lease as of the effective date of the termination.


  

	 	b.	Tenant gives Landlord 180 days prior written notice. 

  

	 	c.	All financial obligations of Tenant under this Lease, including but not limited to Base Rent, Operating Expenses, Additional Rent, alteration costs, fees, late charges and other
charges payable under this Lease are paid through the effective date of the termination or the date Tenant vacates the Premises as required hereunder, whichever is less. 

  

	 	d.	The Premises shall be vacated by Tenant in a clean and sanitary condition and as otherwise required under Paragraph 36 of this Lease on or before the effective date of termination.


  

	 	e.	Tenant shall still be obligated for reconciliation of Operating Expenses through the effective date of the termination or the date Tenant vacates the Premises as required hereunder,
whichever is later. 

  
 From and after receipt by
Landlord of Tenant’s termination notice under clause b above, Landlord shall have full access to the Premises at all times to show the Premises to prospective tenants. 
  
 All other terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

									
	 LANDLORD:
	 	 	 	 TENANT:

			
	 RYAN OAKS, LLC,
 a California limited liability company
	 	 	 	 EXCELLIGENCE LEARNING CORPORATION,
 a Delaware corporation

				
	 By: APSARA, INC.,
 a California corporation
 Its: Managing Member
	 	 	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick M. Gardner
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Richard Delaney

	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 Patrick M. Gardner
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 Its:
	 	 President
	 	 	 	 Its:
	 	 Exec. V.P & CFO

	 Date:
	 	 3/18/04
	 	 	 	 Date:
	 	 3-17-04
# Gold Star Mother's Day, 2008

Throughout our history, the men and women of the Armed Forces have put our Nation's security before their own, doing their duty in the face of grave danger.  On Gold Star Mother's Day, we pay solemn tribute to the mothers of the patriots lost serving this great Nation.

Gold Star Mothers inspire our Nation with their deep devotion to family and country.  These extraordinary women serve their communities, dedicate their time to helping members of our Armed Forces and veterans, and bring comfort and hope to families whose loved ones laid down their lives in the defense of our liberty.  Nothing can compensate for their sacrifice and loss, yet Gold Star Mothers demonstrate tremendous courage and resolve while working to preserve the memory and legacy of all our fallen heroes.

On this day, we honor our country's Gold Star Mothers and remember their sons' and daughters' noble service and great sacrifice.  We offer them our deepest gratitude and our most profound respect, and we ask for God's blessings to be upon them and their families.

The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 115 of June 23, 1936 (49 Stat. 1895 as amended), has designated the last Sunday in September as “Gold Star Mother's Day” and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in its observance.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 28, 2008, as Gold Star Mother's Day.  I call upon all Government officials to display the flag of the United States over Government buildings on this special day.  I also encourage the American people to display the flag and hold appropriate ceremonies as a public expression of our Nation's sympathy and respect for our Gold Star Mothers.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E8-22945

Billing code 3195-01-P
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                Estimated volume                 Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                              (percent)
                      _____________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3      Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1993......    |          54       7      16       5      26      .155      .020      .049     .014      .069
1994......    |          69      10      11      15      33      .187      .026      .032     .037      .082
1995......    |          51      -2      14      13      25      .131     -.004      .039     .032      .061
1996......    |          95      16      27      24      30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6      19      19      50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4      15      24      45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37      35      36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17      34      45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53     140      48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50      58      73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35      48      58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17      46      38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Mark Goldwasser
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark Goldwasser
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 17, 2004


                                       26
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                 CONVERSE INC.
                   INCORPORATED IN DELAWARE ON JULY 22, 1986

                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                  ------------

CONVERSE STAR I, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Massachusetts on March 26, 1985

CONVERSE EMEA LTD., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on January 29, 1990

CONVERSE FRANCE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in France)

CONVERSE EUROPE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branch in the Netherlands)

CONVERSE BENELUX, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Benelux Holding Company, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993 (branches in the Netherlands and
Belgium)

CONVERSE BENELUX HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 23, 1993

CONVERSE GERMANY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on March 21, 1994 (branch in Germany)

CONVERSE IBERIA, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on July 8, 1994 (branches in Portugal and Spain)

CONVERSE ITALY, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on September 21, 1994 (branch in Italy)

CONVERSE JAPAN, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on November 21, 1994 (branch in Japan)

CONVERSE SCANDINAVIA, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Europe, Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on June 7, 1995 (branch in Denmark)

CONVERSE PACIFIC, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on May 2, 1996 (branch in Japan)

CONVERSE MEXICO, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Delaware on October 23, 1996 (branch in Mexico)

CONVERSE ALL STAR DO BRASIL INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA., a subsidiary of Converse
Inc.
Incorporated in Brazil

CALZADO DEPORTIVO DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Mexico on January 25, 1984

CONVERSE EXPORT CO. LIMITED, a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in Barbados on December 28, 1984 (a foreign sales corporation)

APEX ONE, INC., a subsidiary of Converse Inc.
Incorporated in New Jersey on July 8, 1988
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1991: Q3... 53.9 18.3 35.6 2.5 1.4 3.1 6.6 5.8 7.1

 Q4... 53.0 18.4 34.6 -1.6 .6 -2.7 5.7 7.0 5.1

1992: Q1... 51.9 18.9 33.0 -2.1 2.7 -4.6 4.9 8.2 3.1

 Q2... 55.1 19.5 35.6 6.2 3.3 7.8 4.9 8.1 3.2

 Q3... 56.2 19.9 36.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 4.2 8.6 1.9

 Q4... 54.5 19.9 34.7 -2.9 -.2 -4.4 2.9 7.8 .2

1993: Q1... 52.8 20.0 32.8 -3.2 .5 -5.3 1.7 5.6 -.5

 Q2... 56.0 20.6 35.4 6.0 3.1 7.8 1.6 5.4 -.6

 Q3... 58.0 20.8 37.1 3.5 1.2 4.9 3.2 4.7 2.4

 Q4... 57.7 20.9 36.8 -.5 .1 -.8 5.8 5.0 6.2

1994: Q1... 56.8 21.2 35.5 -1.5 1.8 -3.4 7.6 6.4 8.3

 Q2... 61.1 21.9 39.2 7.6 3.2 10.2 9.1 6.4 10.7

 Q3... 63.0 22.4 40.6 3.1 2.2 3.6 8.7 7.5 9.3

 Q4... 61.3 22.6 38.7 -2.7 .7 -4.6 6.2 8.2 5.2

1995: Q1... 59.9 22.9 36.9 -2.3 1.6 -4.6 5.4 8.0 3.9

 Q2... 63.5 23.6 40.0 6.1 2.7 8.2 4.0 7.5 2.0

 Q3... 65.3 23.8 41.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 3.7 6.3 2.3

 Q4... 63.7 23.9 39.8 -2.5 .4 -4.1 3.9 5.9 2.8

1996: Q1... 61.7 24.0 37.7 -3.1 .5 -5.3 3.1 4.8 2.0

 Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 21, 2006                               /s/ Douglas G. Manner
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Douglas G. Manner,
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated June 19, 2008 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 27, 2008 (73 FR 36572), Aptuit, 10245 Hickman Mills Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64137, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Marihuana (7360), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.                

The company plans to import a finished pharmaceutical product containing cannabis extracts in dosage form for packaging for a clinical trial study.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Aptuit to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Aptuit to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: September 22, 2008.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. E8-22881 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Jayson Fulcher

Criminal No . 09-cr-26-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

22) filed by defendant is granted in part ; trial is rescheduled to

the two-week period beginning Tuesday, November 3, 2009 .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : September 3, 200 9

cc : Paul Garrity,

Terry Ollila ,

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Esq .

Esq .

Case 1:09-cr-00026-JD Document 23 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 18, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00333-CR

JOSHUA RAY ARMSTRONG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 071639

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 16, 2022 motion for an extension of 

time to file his reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the reply brief 

received on February 14, 2022 filed as of the date of this order. This case is at issue 

and will be submitted in due course.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
<Page>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

I, David R. Jaffe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Dress Barn, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 18, 2005


/s/ David R. Jaffe
David R. Jaffe
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


                                      F-27
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Dina Warner, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 479]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.