T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E L S A T I NE O S AL C E DO , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 72879 A ge nc yN o. A 071- 949- 040 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay10, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: H U G , R Y M E R an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E l saT i neo S al ce do , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f P eru, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of a fi nal order of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s ( B IA ), w hi ch sum m ar i l y a ff i rm ed th e d e c i s i o n o f

a n i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ( I J ) d e n y i n g h e rap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, 

# FI LED MA Y12 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSS a l c e do doe s notc ont e s tthe I J ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha ts he i s i ne l i gi bl e f or 1 p r o te c tio n u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e .

- 2- w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture. 1 W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1252( a ) ( 1) a nd de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. B e c au s e th e B I A s u m m ar ilya f f irm e dth e I J ’s o r d e rw ith o u t o p in io n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .1 ( e ) ( 4 ) , w e r e v ie w th e I J ’s o r d e ra s th e f in a l a g e n c yd e c is io n , Khup v . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 6 F . 3 d8 9 8 , 9 0 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). W e rev i ew th e IJ’ s ad v erse c r e di bi l i tyf

i ndi ng “ f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a nd m us tuphol d the [ I J ’ s ] f i ndi ng un l es s the evi dence com pel s acontraryre sul t . ” A lm a gh z a rv . G o n z a les , 457 F . 3d 9 1 5 , 9 2 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) . S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e IJ’ s d en i al o f asyl u m b asedo n an ad v erse c r e d ib ilityf

in d in g . S a lc e d o te s tif

ie dth a t ate rr o r is t g r o up c a lle dth e S h in in g P a th w a s the onl ys our c e of

gr a f f i t i on S a l c e do’ s hous e i n P e ru a nd thr e at s tha ts he r e c e i ve d. A c c or di ng t o S a l c e do’ s a s y l um appl i c a t i on and i t s s upport i ng doc um e nt s , how e ve r , the M R T A – adi f f e r e ntt e rr or i s tgr oup – w a s the s our c e of the gr a f f i t i a nd thr e a t s i n que s t i on. S a l c e do f a i l s a de qua t e l yt o a c c ountf orthe i ncon si st enci es betw ee n h ert es t i m on y, supp ort i ng do cum ent at i on , and w ri tt en ap p l i cat i o n . B ecau se th ese “ d i screp an ci es rel at e t o th e b asi s fo r [S al ced o ’ s]- 3-

alleg ed fe aro f p er se cu ti o n ,” th ey g o to th e h ea rt o f h erclaim an dsu p p o rt th e I J’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf

in d in g . de Le o n - Ba rr i o s v . I NS , 11 6 F . 3d 39 1, 39 3-94 (9th C i r. 19 97 ). B e c au s e S a lc e d o c an n o t e s tab lis h e lig ib ilityf o ra s y lu m , “th e I Jp r o p e r ly co n cl u d edth atsh e w as n o tel i g i b l e fo r w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al , w h i ch i m p o ses a heavi erbu rden of proo f. ” Zehat ye v. G on zales , 45 3 F . 3d 11 82 , 11 90 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P E T I T I ON DE NI E D.