alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1994...... 100.0 1.5 5.9 31.4 40.1 16.9 3.3 .9 11.8 12.5 1.2 1.1 1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2000: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.2 3.1 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.5 6.1 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.3 8.9 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.8 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                         2978
<SECURITIES>                                   154050
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4851
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    111901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273780
<PP&E>                                         195903
<DEPRECIATION>                                 109146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 374236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114675
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1255
<OTHER-SE>                                     258306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   374236
<SALES>                                        656174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               656174
<CGS>                                          419479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (7667)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                57862
<INCOME-TAX>                                   21120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            36742
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   36742
<EPS-BASIC>                                    1.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.89


</TABLE>
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1877

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide

that certain sexual crimes against children arepredicate crimes for the interception of communications, and for other purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1877

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that

certain sexual crimes against children are predicate

crimes for the interception of communications, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1877 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Sex Crimes

3 Wiretapping Act of 2002’’.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMU5 NICATIONS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SEX6 UAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18,

8 United States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘2251 and 2252’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2252A’’; and

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘section 2423(b) (relating to

12 travel with intent to engage in a sexual act with a

13 juvenile),’’ after ‘‘motor vehicle parts),’’.

14 (b) TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIV15 ITY.—Section 2516(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

16 amended—

17 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

18 (q);

19 (2) by inserting after paragraph (q) the fol20 lowing:

21 ‘‘(r) a violation of section 2422 (relating to co22 ercion and enticement) and section 2423(a) (relating

23 to transportation of minors) of this title, if, in con24 nection with that violation, the intended sexual activ25 ity would constitute a felony violation of chapter

26 109A or 110, including a felony violation of chapter
3

•HR 1877 EH

1 109A or 110 if the sexual activity occurred, or was

2 intended to occur, within the special maritime and

3 territorial jurisdiction of the United States, regard4 less of where it actually occurred or was intended to

5 occur; or’’; and

6 (3) by redesignating paragraph (r) as para7 graph (s).

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRIAN MILLAN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00092-CR

Appeal from the

243rd Judicial District Court,

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20190D00102)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 21

Schedule of
Subsidiaries

The following is a list of the
registrants subsidiaries at February 23, 2009.

Name of
      Organization
    State of
      IncorporationWest
      Coast Bank
    OregonWest
      Coast Trust Company, Inc.
    OregonTotten
      Inc.
    WashingtonWest
      Coast Statutory Trust III
    ConnecticutWest
      Coast Statutory Trust IV
    ConnecticutWest
      Coast Statutory Trust V
    DelawareWest
      Coast Statutory Trust VI
    DelawareWest
      Coast Statutory Trust VII
    DelawareWest
      Coast Statutory Trust VIII
    Delaware


---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Oliver Hooper

v. Civil No. 08-cv-426-JD

Warden, New Hampshire

Correctional Facility

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Petitioner, Oliver Hooper, who is represented by counsel,

seeks habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his

state court convictions. The Warden filed a motion for summary

judgment on May 15, 2009, and Hooper’s objection was due on or

before June 15, 2009. On June 30, 2009, Hooper filed an

assented-to motion to extend time to object “until 30 days from

the time ordered.” Motion for Extension of Time, doc. no. 12. 

On July 1, 2009, the court granted Hooper’s motion for an

extension of time. The docket indicated that Hooper’s objection

was due on or before July 17, 2009. However, the court’s July 1,

2009, order set a due date for Hooper’s objection for thirty days

from the date of the order. Hooper’s objection to the Warden’s

motion for summary judgment is therefore due on or before July

31, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

July 22, 2009

cc: James Q. Butler, Esquire

Sven D. Wiberg, Esquire

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esquire

Case 1:08-cv-00426-JD Document 14 Filed 07/22/09 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-137325,
333-104835, 333-104458, 333-88382, 333-86113, 333-01649, and 333-162256 on Form
S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-163896 and 333-163880 on Form S-3 of our
reports dated March 11, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of West Coast Bancorp, and the effectiveness of West Coast Bancorp's internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of West Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31,
2009.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Portland,
OregonMarch 11, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

George Blaisdell

v. Civil No. 07-cv-00390-JL

City of Rochester, et al.

 O R D E R

The defendant’s motion to dismiss and for costs and fees

(document no. 21) is granted in part and denied in part. The

plaintiff shall pay the costs and fees associated with the

plaintiff’s scheduled depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

30(d)(2). The defendant shall file, within 7 days of this order,

an accounting of costs and fees associated with the plaintiff’s

scheduled depositions, which shall be subject to court approval.

The case is STAYED (except for the conduct/proceedings

described below) until further order from the court. The stay

will be lifted only upon certification by defendant’s counsel

that the defendant has appeared at her office for deposition, has

been deposed, and that full payment of costs and fees has been

made in satisfaction of this order. If such certification has

not been received within 60 days of this order, the case will be

dismissed for lack of prosecution. 

Case 1:07-cv-00390-JL Document 23 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: April 7, 2010

cc: George Blaisdell, pro se

Catherine M. Costanzo, Esq.

2

Case 1:07-cv-00390-JL Document 23 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

John S. Briand

Public Integrity Data Base of New England

v. Civil No. 08-cv-24-JL

James A. Watson

Bryant G. Pake

O R D E R

Before the Court is John Briand’s complaint (document no.

1), filed on behalf of himself and Public Integrity Data Base of

New England (“PIDB”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that

plaintiffs’ rights under the federal Constitution, as well as

federal and state statutory law, have been violated. The matter

is before me for preliminary review to determine whether or not

the complaint states any claim upon which relief might be

granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; United States District Court

District of New Hampshire Local Rule (“LR”) 4.3(d)(2). For the

reasons explained fully in the Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, I direct that the Fourth

Amendment claim in the complaint proceed against defendants James

Watson and Bryant Pake. In my Report and Recommendation, I

Case 1:08-cv-00024-JL Document 9 Filed 06/26/08 Page 1 of 3
2

recommend that the remaining claims, as well as plaintiff Public

Integrity Data Base of New England, be dismissed from this

action.

Without further comment on the merits of the complaint, I

order that the complaint be served on Defendants. As plaintiff

has provided summons forms for each defendant, the Clerk’s office

shall issue the summonses against defendants and forward to the

United States Marshal for the District of New Hampshire (the

“U.S. Marshal’s office”) the summonses and copies of the

complaint (document no. 1), the Report and Recommendation issued

simultaneously with this Order, and this Order. Upon receipt of

the necessary documentation, the U.S. Marshal’s office shall

effect service upon Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). 

Defendants are instructed to answer or otherwise plead

within twenty days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A). 

Plaintiff is instructed that all future pleadings, written

motions, notices, or similar papers shall be served directly on 

Case 1:08-cv-00024-JL Document 9 Filed 06/26/08 Page 2 of 3
3

the Defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or

their attorney(s), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b). 

SO ORDERED.

________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: June 26, 2008

cc: John S. Briand, pro se

Public Integrity Data Base of New England

Case 1:08-cv-00024-JL Document 9 Filed 06/26/08 Page 3 of 3
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11796 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MIGUEL ANGEL GUTIERREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 466

- 1

Before JONES , DENNIS , and GRAVES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Gutierrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez h a s not filed a res ponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11796 Document: 00514279621 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017No. 16

- 11796

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdr aw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11796 Document: 00514279621 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: WilmingtonTrust, National Association. 

 
By: /s/ Corey HenryName: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2022**
<PAGE>   1
Confidential Treatment requested by ASA Holdings, Inc., File No. 333-13071

                                 EXHIBIT 10(d)

                    Confidential treatment has been applied
                    for with respect to certain provisions
                    of this Exhibit, which provisions have 
                    been omitted from this Exhibit, marked 
                    with an asterisk [*] and filed separately
                    with the SEC
<PAGE>   2

                  AMENDMENT TO THE DELTA CONNECTION AGREEMENT


         This Amendment ("Amendment") effective 01 day of July, 1988, amends
the Delta Connection Agreement ("Agreement") between Delta Air Lines, Inc.
("Delta"), Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia 30320 and
Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. ("ASA"), 1688 Phoenix Parkway, College Park,
Georgia 30349.

         This Amendment amends the above-referenced Agreement, and except as
expressly modified hereby the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
and shall govern the performance, obligations and remedies of the parties.

         Delta and ASA hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

Article 3 is hereby amended to add the following as Paragraph D:

   
D.       ASA will pay Delta for all amounts paid by Delta to [*           
                                ] attributable to passengers booked on
         ASA flights who do not [*               ].  For purposes of computing 
         the amount of this payment, the number of ASA passengers who do not 
         [*                      ] in a given month will be divided by the 
         total number of ASA passengers, and the quotient will be multiplied 
         times the amount of the payment made to each [*     ] for the 
         applicable month. Payments due hereunder are applicable only to those
         [*          ] which now or in the future provide Delta with a 
         breakdown of ASA passengers booked. 
    


         This Amendment is effective on the date first written above and shall
remain in effect until the Agreement is terminated.

         The terms as defined in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as
in this Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment by their
undersigned duly authorized representatives.


ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC.       DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
                                      
                                      
By:    /s/ John W. Beiser               By: /s/ W. Whitley Hawkins 
       ---------------------                -----------------------
       Senior Vice President                W. Whitney Hawkins
Title: Sales and Service                    Senior Vice President -
       ---------------------                Marketing
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1937

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in certain feasibility

studies of water resource projects in the State of Washington.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2001

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. DICKS, Mr. INSLEE, and Mr.

SMITH of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in

certain feasibility studies of water resource projects in

the State of Washington.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pacific Northwest Fea5 sibility Studies Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may

8 engage in the following feasibility studies:
2

•HR 1937 IH

1 (1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasi2 bility Study, to identify ways to meet future domes3 tic and commercial water distribution needs of the

4 Tulalip Indian Reservation on the Eastern Shore of

5 Puget Sound, Washington.

6 (2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water

7 Supply Feasibility Study, to identify additional

8 groundwater supply sources for the Lower Elwha In9 dian Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, Wash10 ington.

11 (3) The Makah Community Water Source

12 Project Feasibility Study, to identify ways to meet

13 the current and future domestic and commercial

14 water supply and distribution needs of the Makah

15 Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.

16 (b) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF RESULTS.—The Sec17 retary of the Interior shall make available to the public,

18 upon request, the results of each feasibility study author19 ized under subsection (a), and shall promptly publish in

20 the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those

21 results.

Æ