alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December 20, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FLORENTINO ROBERT EN GLISH , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 0042 1

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED , to read as follows: we reform the judgment of the trial court to reflect the administrative fees assessed in the amount of $ 0

. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2109

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 1, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a

special resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in

Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible inclusion in the National Park System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2109 RFS

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

2 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior (in this

3 Act referred to as ‘‘the Secretary’’) shall conduct a study

4 of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida,

5 which was used for recreation by African Americans at

6 a time when public beaches were racially segregated by

7 law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of

8 the site and the suitability and feasibility of establishing

9 the site as a unit of the National Park System.

10 (b) CRITERIA.—In conducting the study required by

11 subsection (a), the Secretary shall use the criteria for the

12 study of areas for potential inclusion in the National Park

13 System contained in section 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16

14 U.S.C. 1a–5; popularly known as the National Park Sys15 tem General Authorities Act).

16 SEC. 2. REPORT.

17 Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall

18 transmit to the Congress a report on the findings of the

19 study and the conclusions and recommendations of the

20 Secretary.

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.39.3
When Recorded
Return To:

Placer Dome U.S. Inc.
240 So. Rock Blvd., Ste. 117
Reno, Nevada  89502
       Attention:  Land/Legal Mgr.
_______________________________________________________________________________
A.P.N. (Unpatented Mining Claims)

                                  CORPORATION
                                  -----------
                         GRANT, BARGAIN AND SALE DEED
                         ----------------------------
                          (Unpatented Mining Claims)

     Inland Resources Inc., a Washington corporation, formerly doing business as
Inland Gold and Silver Corp. ("Grantor"), in consideration of Ten Dollars
($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to
Placer Dome U.S. Inc. a California corporation ("Grantee") those certain
unpatented mining claims located in Lander County, Nevada, and more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.

     Together with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, appurtenances,
the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and
profits thereof.

     To have and to hold, all and singular, the above-mentioned and described
property unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever.

     In witness whereof, Grantor has caused its corporate name to be hereto
affixed by its representative duly authorized pursuant to a corporate resolution
of its Board of Directors this 30th day of December, 1996.

                                INLAND RESOURCES INC., a Washington
                                corporation formerly doing business as Inland 
                                Gold and Silver Corp.

                                By
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                 Its
                                    -------------------------------------

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
                        CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF ___________________     )
                                 )  ss.
COUNTY OF __________________     )

     This instrument was acknowledged before me on ____________________, 1996,
by _________________, on behalf of Inland Resources Inc.



                                        -------------------------------------
                                        NOTARY PUBLIC

                                        (My Commission Expires:___________)

                                       2
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT "A"


                           UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS

                                       3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 07-cr-252-01,02-JD

Eduardo K. Fernandez-Avalos, et al

O R D E R

The joint assented to motion to reschedule jury trial

(document no. 22) filed by defendant Maria C. Rosario is granted.

Defendants shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and

the defendants in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv),

for the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: February 27, 2008

cc: Martin Leppo, Esq.

Paul Twomey, Esq.

Steven M. Gordon, Esq.

Mark Irish, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00252-JD Document 23 Filed 02/27/08 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:08-cv-00202-MML Document 20 Filed 10/23/08 Page 1 of 1
174 La. 81

#### BARCELO v. BARCELO.

No. 31533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1932.

Cobb & Jones, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Buck, Walshe & Buck, of New Orleans, for appellee.

ODOM, J.

Plaintiff, a minor, through her mother as natural tutrix, sued defendant, her paternal grandfather, for support and maintenance under art. 229 of the Civil Code, which provides that relatives in the direct ascending line are bound to maintain their needy descendants. She asked that she be granted $50 per month.

There was judgment in her favor for $15 per month, a sum much less than she sued for.

After the judgment was rendered, the defendant tendered and she accepted $30, being the full amount due under the judgment for. two months. She then appealed devolutively to this court. Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of acquiescence.

The issue here involved is identical with that raised and decided in the case of Foster & Glassell Co., Ltd. v. Mrs. Augie E. Harrison et al., 173 La. 550, 138 So. 99, decided November 3, 1931.

We there held that a plaintiff who obtains judgment for an amount less than he claims *766may execute the judgment in so far as it'is in his favor, and prosecute an appeal to obtain the balance which he claims.

That holding was predicated upon the proposition that the mere fact and that alone of the execution by a plaintiff of a judgment in so far as it is in his favor does not, as a matter of law, evince an intention on his part to acquiesce in the judgment in so far as it rejects part of his demand.

In so holding, we followed the cases of Augustin v. Farnsworth, 155 La. 1053, 99 So. 868; Kittredge v. Grau, 158 La. 154, 103 So. 723; Cory v. Askew, 169 La. 479, 125 So. 455, and Planters’ Bank & Trust Co. v. Savant, 172 La. 464, 134 So. 394, and specifically overruled all previous decisions which apparently held to the contrary.

We adhere to our ruling in these eases.

In the case at bar, plaintiff obtained judgment for less than she claimed, and accepted from defendant the amounts awarded her. She' did no more. Her acceptance of these amounts does not evince an intention on her part to abide the results of the judgment.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                              THOUSAND TRAILS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (Dollars and common shares in thousands)



<Table>
<Caption>
                                                             Nine Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                                               March 31, 2002      March 31, 2001
                                                             -----------------   -----------------
<S>                                                          <C>                 <C>
BASIC:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                     8,129               8,087
                                                             =================   =================

Net income allocable to common shareholders                  $           6,029   $           3,546
                                                             =================   =================

Net income per common share -- basic                         $            0.74   $            0.43
                                                             =================   =================

DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                     8,129               8,087
Weighted average common stock equivalents -
  Dilutive options                                                         509                 499
                                                             -----------------   -----------------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                     8,638               8,586
                                                             =================   =================

Net income allocable to common shareholders                  $           6,029   $           3,546
                                                             =================   =================

Net income per common share -- diluted                       $            0.70   $            0.41
                                                             =================   =================
</Table>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2024

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit desecration of Veterans’

memorials.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit

desecration of Veterans’ memorials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Memorials

5 Protection Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESECRATION OF VETERANS’ MEMORIALS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:
2

•HR 2024 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1369. Desecration of veterans’ memorials

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in sub3 section (b), willfully injures or commits any depredation

4 against any structure, plaque, statue, or other monument

5 on public property commemorating the service of any per6 son or persons in the armed forces of the United States,

7 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

8 10 years, or both, but if the damage or attempted damage

9 does not exceed the sum of $1,000, the defendant shall

10 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one

11 year, or both.

12 ‘‘(b) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a)

13 is that in committing the offense, the defendant travels

14 or causes another to travel in interstate or foreign com15 merce, or uses the mail or an instrumentality of interstate

16 or foreign commerce.’’.

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

18 at the beginning of chapter 65 of title 18, United States

19 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1369. Desecration of veterans’ memorials.’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 INTERWEST MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 USC 1350) The undersigned, Arch B. Gilbert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
InterWest Medical Corporation (the Company), has executed this Certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys current report on Form 10-K
(the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:  
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification as of the 23rd day
of December 2004. /s/ Arch B. GilbertArch B. GilbertPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Baxter

Claimant

v. Civil No. 07-cv-200-SM

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner

Social Security Administration

Respondent

O R D E R

Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated September 5, 2008, to which no objection

has been filed, as well as the legal memoranda filed by the

claimant and the Commissioner, I hereby accept and adopt that

Report and Recommendation, for the reasons stated therein. 

Claimant’s motion to reverse the decision of the Commissioner

(document no. 8) is denied, and the Commissioner’s motion to

affirm his decision (document no. 11) is granted. The Clerk of

the Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and

close the case. 

Case 1:07-cv-00200-SM Document 14 Filed 09/24/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

September 24, 2008

cc: D. Lance Tillinghast, Esq.

Seth R. Aframe, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00200-SM Document 14 Filed 09/24/08 Page 2 of 2
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2006...... 75.3 56.9 68.0 70.4 84.1 91.8 68.7 66.1 65.5 79.8 2007...... 69.6 62.0 62.0 63.5 68.8 88.1 64.3 63.3 66.1 72.0 2004: Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Q2... 75.9 68.7 69.8 66.0 85.6 90.8 68.8 64.4 70.3 79.4  Q3... 78.3 43.0 64.3 81.2 78.5 96.6 76.9 72.9 62.9 83.5  Q4... 76.6 62.7 67.4 74.9 91.4 87.1 65.4 62.3 65.3 82.9 2007: Q1... 64.6 71.8 68.1 55.8 50.0 87.4 62.6 64.9 70.9 62.9  Q2... 71.4 55.6 75.2 65.5 70.8 90.0 63.9 65.3 71.3 73.3  Q3... 74.8 41.5 75.5 71.7 70.2 89.8 66.2 64.0 61.1 82.8  Q4... 69.1 65.5 43.5 64.6 77.1 86.1 64.6 59.1 61.3 73.1 2008: Q1... 68.7 71.7 48.9 62.6 47.5 91.4 56.9 53.5 64.3 71.5  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 501 West 10th Street in Fort Worth, Texas,as the ‘‘Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse’’.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1801

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 501

West 10th Street in Fort Worth, Texas, as the ‘‘Eldon

B. Mahon United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1801 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 501 West

3 10th Street in Fort Worth, Texas, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Eldon B. Mahon United States Court5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Eldon B. Mahon United States

11 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 12

Prime Succession, Inc. and subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Dollars in Thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                                    June 30,                        June 30,
                                                                    --------                        --------
                                                            2000              1999            2000             1999
                                                            ----              ----            ----             ----
<S>                                                       <C>               <C>             <C>              <C>
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Earnings:
      Loss before income taxes                            $(7,066)          $(2,446)        $(11,276)        $(2,222)
      Add: Fixed charges, net                               7,055             6,258           13,668          12,350

Income (loss) before income taxes and fixed                   (11)            3,812            2,392          10,128
charges, net

Fixed Charges:
      Total interest (1)                                    6,742             6,003           13,056          11,855
      Interest factor in rents(2)                             313               255              612             495

        Total fixed charges                                 7,055             6,258           13,668          12,350

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                             --              0.61             0.18            0.82

Coverage deficiency (3)                                     7,066             2,446           11,276           2,222
</TABLE>

FN

(1)      Total interest expense for each period includes amortization of loan
         costs.

(2)      Interest factor in rents represents one-third of rent expense, which is
         considered representative of the interest factor.

(3)      The Company's earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges for all
         periods presented. Coverage deficiency represents the excess of fixed
         charges over income before income taxes and fixed charges, net.


                                       22
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 02, 2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Penny S. MacDonald, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that the evidence was legally sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction of petit larceny *(see, People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Sprague, J.— petit larceny.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.