alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 99




---



##### 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Board of Directors
First Charter Corporation: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
First Charter Corporation on Form S-3 (No. 333-60641) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-95003, 333-66362, 333-66354, 333-57710, 333-54019, 333-54021, 333-54023,
33-60949, and 333-71497), of our report dated February 25, 2004, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of First Charter Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, included in the 2003 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of First Charter Corporation. Our report dated February 25, 2004
refers to the fact that on January 1, 2002, the Corporation adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, and on October 1, 2002, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 145  Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections and Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 147 Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions. KPMG LLP Charlotte, North Carolina
March 10, 2004 100
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1853

CHESTER A. YATES , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv
- 00189

- GCM )

Submitted : November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and r emanded by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chester A. Yates , Appellant Pro Se. Douglas William Hanna , GRAEBE HANNA & SULLIVAN, PLLC , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Chester A. Yates seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S .C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292;
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it has resolved all claims as to all parties.”
Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the
claims raised in the complaint. See id. at 696

- 97. Specifically, the district court failed to
address Yates’ allegations of harassment and intimidation and his allegations regarding
theft of renewals and clients

— allegations that go beyond simple termination of his
contract. We conclude that t he order Yates seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for consideration of the unresolved claim s. Id . at 6 99. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Juan Acosta

v . Civil No. 07-cv-181-PB

NH State Prison, Warden

ORDE R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated August 2, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

September 25, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Juan Acosta, pro se

Karin Eckel, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00181-JL Document 9 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 17, 2021

No. 04-19-00318-CV

Leticia R. BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

Cristina B. ALEXANDER as permanent guardian of the person of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr., et 

al.,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ-000161-D1

Honorable Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant/cross-appellee, Leticia R. Benavides, filed an unopposed motion requesting an 

extension of time in which to file her reply brief. The motion is GRANTED and the reply brief 

is due no later than March 23, 2021.

It is so ORDERED on March 17, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Juan Marquez,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 08-cv-522-SM

Hillsborough County,

Ryan Levierge, Todd Gordon,

George Antilus, Ronald Potter,

Jason Riley, Nicholas Granville,

Vincent Williams, and John Does 1-5

Defendants

O R D E R

It appears that the plaintiff did make an effort to exhaust

administrative remedies available to him before filing suit. 

Defendants contend, however, that plaintiff’s efforts were

irregular and ineffective.

Within 14 days of the date of this order defendants shall

file a well-supported legal memorandum addressing their position

regarding exhaustion in light of plaintiff’s having filed a

grievance form. Plaintiff shall respond within 14 days after

defendants’ memorandum is filed.

Trial is continued until November of 2010.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

July 27, 2010

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

John A. Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00522-SM Document 29 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Carol J. Wilber, Appellant, v Darlene Breen, as Administrator of the Estate of Angela DiMura, Deceased, Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 783]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Caruso, J.), entered December 10, 2004 in Schenectady County, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident, as a result of which she brought the instant action seeking damages for the personal injuries she sustained during the course thereof. Following joinder of issue and discovery, defendant successfully sought summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff now appeals.

We begin by noting that defendant clearly established, prima facie, that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury. At issue here then is whether plaintiff produced competent medical evidence raising a material issue of fact as to the existence of a serious injury *(see Hayes v Johnston,*17 AD3d 853, 854 [2005]). We think not.

The record reveals that plaintiff suffered a soft-tissue injury which, she claims, constitutes a “significant limitation of use of a body function or system” and a “permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member,” two of the categories encompassed in the definition of “serious injury” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). In support of her claim, plaintiff submitted the affirmation and office records of one of her treating physicians, Lynne Nicolson. Nicolson opined that plaintiff suffered a chronic lumbar strain, whiplash-type cervical strain and myofascial pain syndrome, which is permanent and will prevent plaintiff from engaging in many routine activities. She further opined (in the language of the statute and the case law interpreting it) that plaintiff suffered “a significant limitation *837and/or loss of use of her neck, upper back and trapezius region,” which “condition is more than mild or slight.” Such conclusory statements are not sufficient to raise a question of fact as to the seriousness of plaintiffs injuries. Rather, plaintiffs physician must either describe whatever limitations are found to exist and assign a numeric percentage to them or provide a qualitative assessment of plaintiffs condition and compare it to the normal function, purpose or use of the affected body, organ, member, function or system (see *Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 350 [2002]). This Nicolson failed to do and, accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          59
          8
          16
          12
          24
          .124
          .017
          .035
          .026
          .0482006
          73
          9
          7
          23
          34
          .146
          .018
          .015
          .045
          .0642007
          90
          8
          13
          23
          47
          .170
          .014
          .025
          .042
          .0852008
          150
          12
          20
          42
          75
          .269
          .022
          .037
          .074
          .1292009
          n.a.
          65
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .111
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 02, 2009
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          32
          4
          6
          8
          14
          .082
          .010
          .015
          .021
          .0342004
          18
          1
          5
          2
          10
          .044
          .003
          .012
          .005
          .0212005
          17
          2
          11
          4
          0
          .039
          .005
          .024
          .009
          .0002006
          20
          2
          6
          1
          12
          .042
          .003
          .012
          .002
          .0232007
          8
          -3
          0
          5
          6
          .015
          -.006
          .000
          .009
          .0112008
          54
          5
          8
          12
          29
          .093
          .008
          .013
          .020
          .0462009
          184
          33
          41
          34
          77
          .289
          .051
          .064
          .051
          .1162010
          n.a.
          67
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .102
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 6, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,528
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,807
<PP&E>                                         114,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,587
<BONDS>                                            597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,177
<SALES>                                          2,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,848
<CGS>                                              529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (171)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (396)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,234)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Foldera, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Reid Dabney, Senior Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March
                          27, 2008
                
                /s/
                    Reid DabneyReid
                          Dabney
                        Senior
                          Vice President and Chief Financial
                          Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Eugene P. Heytow, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Oak BrookBancshares, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annualreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis annual report based on such evaluations; and  c) disclosed in this annual report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control which are reasonablylikely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /S/ EUGENE P. HEYTOW Eugene P. HeytowChief Executive OfficerMarch 8, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                  EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF
                              PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               For The Three Months Ended       For The Six Months Ended
                                                                       June 30,                         June 30,        
                                                               -------------------------      ----------------------------
                                                                   1997          1996             1997             1996
<S>                                                            <C>                            <C>              <C>
Net Income                                                     $14,771,651   $18,430,242      $25,504,133      $29,727,377

Net Income per Share                                                 $0.49         $0.59            $0.85            $0.95

Weighted Number of Shares Outstanding                           30,004,611    31,325,281       30,017,675       31,407,522
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10

         CHINA FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMPANY 8 WEST 38TH STREET, 9TH FLOOR

                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10018

                                  212-398-7833

                                FAX: 718-357-0643

                                  March 4, 2001

Grace Ying
Tritradex Incorporated
17 Westbury Avenue
Mineola, N.Y. 11501

Dear Mrs. Ying:

Pursuant to our recent discussions,  our company agrees to issue a company check
in  the  amount  of  $  80,000.00  U.S.  Dollars,   made  payable  to  Tritradex
Incorporated (a New York Corporation).  Both parties understand that these funds
are being sent prior to the final  contract  signing,  whereby our company  will
participate in an equity  investment in either  Tritradex  Incorporated  or it's
subsidiary,  Shanghai Tritradex Machinery,  Inc. In addition, both parties agree
that if a final contract is not signed by April 30, 2001, Tritradex Incorporated
will  return  said funds to our  company,  within ten (10) days.  Finally,  both
parties  further  agree that in the event  that  Tritradex  Incorporated  cannot
fulfill all of the terms of this  agreement,  then Grace Ying will be personally
responsible  to  return  said  funds  to  our  company,  within  ten  (10)  days
immediately  following the  expiration of the initial ten (10) day  requirement,
agreed to by Tritradex Incorporated.

Sincerely,

By: /s/ James Tilton
--------------------
        James Tilton
        President

Agreed and accepted: Agreed and accepted:

By: /s/ Grace Ying
------------------
        Grace Ying
        As a Private Individual
        Corporate Secretary
        Tritradex Incorporated
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02215-LTB-KLM

CHARLES MASON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

MINUTE ORDER

______________________________________________________________________

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Modify

Scheduling Order to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline [Docket No. 22; Filed January

4, 2013] (the “Motion”). Defendant seeks a one-month extension of the dispositive motion

deadline.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#22] is GRANTED. The Scheduling

Order entered on June 28, 2012 [#10] is modified to extend the following deadline:

• Dispositive Motion Deadline February 14, 2013

Dated: January 7, 2013

Case 1:11-cv-02215-LTB-KLM Document 24 Filed 01/07/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1