alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

The Freedom from Religion 

Foundation, et al. 

v. Case No. 07-CV-356-SM 

Hanover School District, et al. 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

Please take notice that Rosanna T. Fox, Esq., co-counsel for Plaintiff, The 

Freedom from Religion Foundation, has changed the following information contained in 

the original ECF Registration Form: 

 Rosanna T. Fox, Esq. 

 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, 

The Freedom from Religion Foundation 

 12 Eldorado Circle 

 Nashua, NH 03062 

 (603) 318-8479 

November 9, 2009 BY:_/s/___________________________ 

 Rosanna T. Fox, Esq. 

 Bar No. 17693 

 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, 

 The Freedom from Religion Foundation 

 12 Eldorado Circle 

 Nashua NH 03062 

 (603) 318-8479 

 rosief13@comcast.net

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 67 Filed 11/09/09 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing notice was served on the following persons on 

this date and in the manner specified herein: 

Electronically served through ECF: 

All Counsel of Record 

Conventionally Served: 

Edward O’Brien, Esq. 

O’Brien Law Firm 

1 Sundial Avenue 

Manchester, NH 03103-7204 

Case 1:07-cv-00356-SM Document 67 Filed 11/09/09 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1914 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1914

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 7, 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend for 4 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277, as 
amended by Public Law 106-5, Public Law 106-70, and Public Law 107-8, 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``June 1, 2001'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2001'', and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``June 30, 2000'' and inserting 
                ``May 31, 2001'', and
                    (B) by striking ``July 1, 2000'' and inserting 
                ``June 1, 2001''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on June 1, 2001.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Presstek, Inc.

v. Case No. 05-cv-65-PB

Creo, Inc., et al.

O R D E R

Document Nos. 73, 79, 82, 83, 84, 93 and 96 are denied

without prejudice to the right to renew after a trial date has

been set. No motions other than the ones that are explicitly

authorized by the court may be filed. Any party may obtain

permission to file a motion by requesting a telephone conference

and obtaining the court’s permission to file the motion at the

conference.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 2, 2007

cc: Arpiar Sanders, Jr., Esq.

Brian A. Comack, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00065-PB Document 126 Filed 05/02/07 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Kenneth P. George, Esq.

Michael Kasdam, Esq.

James Rosenberg, Esq.

Courtney Quinn Brooks, Esq.

William F. Lee, Esq.

Gordon J. MacDonald, Esq.

Nora Q.E. Passamaneck, Esq.

Lisa J. Pirozzolo, Esq.

James D. Rosenberg, Esq.

S. Calvin Walden, Esq.

Michael V. Solomita, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00065-PB Document 126 Filed 05/02/07 Page 2 of 2
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3          Q4          Total
________________________________________________________________________________

1982......    |             2           3           3           3             11
1983......    |             1           1           2           3              7
1984......    |             3           7          10          12             32
1985......    |            12          21          17          18             68
1986......    |            14          14          21          16             65
1987......    |            22          19          12          16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12           7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5           5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6           3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3           1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1           4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2           0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0           0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0           0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0           0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0           1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1           0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0           0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0           1              2
2003......    |             0           1           0           0              1
________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm production

Estimated volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1998...... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.2 1.0 1.2 .3 .9

1999...... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .8 1.3 .2 1.1

2000...... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .9 1.2 .2 1.0

2001...... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002...... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003...... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005...... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

2006...... .7 .4 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2007...... .7 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2008...... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .8 .6 .1 .5

2001: Q3... 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .7 2.8 1.0 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.3 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.7 1.2 1.5 .2 1.3

2002: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 3.9 2.1 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .8 .2 .6 2.9 1.2 1.8 .5 1.3

 Q3... 1.3 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.2 .5 .7 .1 .6 2.6 1.0 1.6 .3 1.3

2003: Q1... 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6 4.0 2.1 1.9 .4 1.5

 Q2... 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7 3.1 1.1 2.0 .5 1.5

 Q3... 1.2 .4 .8 .2 .6 2.7 .9 1.8 .4 1.4

 Q4... 1.0 .4 .7 .1 .5 2.3 .8 1.5 .3 1.2

2004: Q1... 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5 3.0 1.3 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.1 .7 1.3 .3 1.0

 Q3... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .5 1.0 .2 .9

2005: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 2.3 1.2 1.1 .3 .9

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .3 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .5 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .6 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 1.1 .8 .2 .5

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .2 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q3... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .7 .4 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2007: Q1... 1.0 .6 .4 .1 .3 1.9 1.1 .8 .3 .5

 Q2... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .7 .9 .2 .7

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.2 .5 .7 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .7 .6 .1 .5

2008: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.7 1.0 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .2 .5

 Q3... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .8 .6 .1 .5

 Note. Data are estimates of the national totals for non-real-estate farm loans. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign

results for large banks that report farm delinquencies on a consolidated basis and for small banks that are allowed to report

delinquencies according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

22
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

t0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147475

NEJLA ISRAEL,

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant- Appellant,

v SC: 147475

COA: 316249

Macomb CC: 2011-002782-CH

RAMIZ PUTRUS and NAJAH PUTRUS,

Defendants/Counter Plaintiffs- Appellees, and

RAMIZ PUTRUS and NAJAH PUTRUS,

Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v

FOUAD ZORA,

Third-Party Defendant,

and

BI-COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER, P.C., and

UNIVERSAL URGENT CARE, P.C.,

Intervenor Plaintiff,

v

NEJLA ISRAEL and FOUAD ZORA,

Intervenor Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
107TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061 

AN ACT 

To amend the charter of Southeastern University of the 

District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2061 EH 

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER OF SOUTH2 EASTERN UNIVERSITY REGARDING BOARD 

3 OF TRUSTEES. 

4 Section 3 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act for the relief 

5 of the Southeastern University of the Young Men’s Chris6 tian Association of the District of Columbia’’, approved 

7 August 19, 1937 (50 Stat. 697), as amended by section 

8 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the charter of 

9 Southeastern University of the District of Columbia’’, ap10 proved October 10, 1966 (80 Stat. 883), is amended— 

11 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘, one12 third of whom’’ and all that follows and inserting a 

13 period; and 

14 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘elected 

15 for a term’’ and inserting ‘‘elected by the board for 

16 a term’’. 

17 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CURRENT TRUSTEES. 

18 The amendment made by section 1 shall not affect 

19 the term of office of any individual serving on the Board 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2061 EH 

1 of Trustees of Southeastern University as of the date of 

2 the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2001. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS

hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
107TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2061 

AN ACT 

To amend the charter of Southeastern University of 

the District of Columbia. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1993...... 2.70 .36 .27 1.62 .18 .27 1.65 .56 .37 .12 1994...... 2.53 .28 .23 1.56 .18 .27 1.55 .51 .35 .12 1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2001: Q4... 1.57 .17 .15 .92 .10 .24 .81 .38 .26 .12 2002: Q1... 1.76 .14 .16 1.10 .13 .24 .90 .39 .34 .14  Q2... 2.44 .11 .15 1.78 .13 .26 1.44 .52 .34 .14  Q3... 1.95 .07 .14 1.40 .14 .20 1.16 .40 .29 .10  Q4... 1.65 .13 .15 1.09 .07 .20 .92 .36 .28 .09 2003: Q1... 1.69 .13 .14 1.08 .16 .18 .84 .37 .33 .15  Q2... 1.81 .11 .12 1.27 .15 .15 1.07 .37 .27 .09  Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
|July 22, 2009                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania
Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will be retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mario ALVARADO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10099.

D.C. No. CR-01-00461-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 2002.*

Decided Jan. 17, 2003.

Before SKOPIL, BOOCHEVER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Mario Alvarado (“Alvarado”) appeals his 21 month sentence following his guilty plea to one count of subscribing to a false tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Alvarado contends that the district court erred in denying a two-level reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.

Whether a defendant has accepted responsibility is a factual determination which we review for clear error. *United States v. Fisher,*137 F.3d 1158, 1167 (9th Cir.1998).

Following his indictment, Alvarado entered into a plea agreement in which the government agreed to recommend a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, should the probation officer make such a recommendation. The probation officer subsequently recommended the two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The defendant wrote a letter to the court and stated at sentencing that he knew he “did wrong” and took “full responsibility for my actions.” The government recommended the two-level reduction for acceptance of *676responsibility and joins in the defendant’s argument on appeal that the district court erred in denying the reduction.

Whether a defendant has accepted personal responsibility is a factual determination, albeit requiring an inquiry into the defendant’s “genuine contrition.” *See United States v. McKinney,*15 F.3d 849, 853 (9th Cir.1994). From the record reviewed as a whole, Alvarado presented facts indicating that he accepted responsibility for the crime to which he pled guilty. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment, (n.3). There is no evidence contrary to his claim of acceptance of responsibility.

If the district court had specific reasons for denial of the adjustment, the reasons are not apparent on this record. The fact that Alvarado claimed he was sick and could not locate his records is not contradictory to his admission that he acted willfully in filing a false tax return.

Because Alvarado has presented uncontroverted evidence sufficient for a two-level reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with this holding. *See United States v. Flores,*93 F.3d 587, 590-91 (9th Cir.1996).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
| Name of Organization             |        | State of Incorporation |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------|------------------------|--------|
| West Coast Bank                  | Oregon      |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Trust Company, Inc.   | Oregon      |
|                             |        |
| Totten Inc.                      | Washington  |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust III   | Connecticut |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust IV    | Connecticut |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust V     | Delaware    |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust VI    | Delaware    |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust VII   | Delaware    |
|                             |        |
| West Coast Statutory Trust VIII  | Delaware    |
|                             |        |
| Park Place Condos, LLC           | Oregon      |
|                             |        |
| Carrington Square Developer, LLC | Oregon      |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Maynard Archer, Appellant.

[810 NYS2d 86]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered February 3, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denied (Grosso, J.), after a hearing (Demakos, J.H.O.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence since the evidence was obtained from a search incident to a lawful arrest *(see People v Parker,*306 AD2d 543 [2003]).

The trial court properly refused to charge the jury with trespass *(see*Penal Law § 140.05) as a lesser-included offense of burglary in the third degree (see Penal Law § 140.20), since no reasonable view of the evidence could lead one to conclude that the defendant, equipped with a burglar’s tools, attempted an unlawful entry into the premises for an innocent, rather than a criminal, purpose (see CPL 300.50 [1]; *People v Martin,*59 NY2d 704 [1983]; *People v Rohena,*183 AD2d 859 [1992]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
                                  Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
1995......    |          51      -2       14       13       25      .131     -.004      .039     .032      .061
1996......    |          95      16       27       24       30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6       19       19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4       15       24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18       37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11       17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67       53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40       50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34       35       48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28       17       46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8       16       12       24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |        n.a.       9     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .018      n.a.     n.a.      n.a.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23