alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 * 

Freda McHugh, * 

Individually and as Administratrix * 

 * 

Plaintiff * 

 * 

v. * Case No.: 1:08-cv-00317-JM 

 * 

Michael Giannopolo, * 

 * 

 Defendant * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING 

SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 2, 2008 

 NOW comes the Plaintiff, Freda McHugh, Individually and as Administratrix, by 

and through her attorneys, Boynton, Waldron, Doleac & Scott, PA and respectfully 

moves to continue the hearing scheduled for December 2, 2008, stating in support thereof 

as follows: 

 1. The parties in the above-captioned matter have tentatively reached a settlement. 

2. The Defendant, Michael Giannopolo, has offered through his motor vehicle 

insurance company the policy limit of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000). 

3. There is an underinsured/uninsured motorist policy which was in existence at 

the time of the incident alleged in the writ. This UM carrier has required an 

asset check be conducted internally prior to providing authority and consent to 

settle this case for the policy limits. 

4. To date, the parties are still negotiating with the UM carrier to obtain the 

necessary authority and consent to settle at the offered policy limits. 

5. The Plaintiff requests a continuance of thirty (30) days for the damages 

hearing. 

Case 1:08-cv-00317-JM Document 7 Filed 11/26/08 Page 1 of 2
6. Due to the relief sought, no separate memorandum of law is necessary. 

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Court: 

A. Continue the Hearing scheduled for December 2, 2008 at 9:30am; and 

B. Grant all further relief which is just and reasonable. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Freda McHugh, Individually and as 

Administratrix 

By her attorneys, 

BOYNTON, WALDRON, DOLEAC, 

WOODMAN & SCOTT, P.A. 

Dated: November 26, 2008 By: /s/ Heather Neville

 Heather Neville, Bar #17139 

 82 Court Street, PO Box 418 

Portsmouth, NH 03802-0418 

(603) 436-4010 

 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND FILING

I, Heather Neville, do hereby certify that I have, on this 26th day of November, 

2008, caused a copy of this document to be served upon the Defendant, Michael 

Giannopolo, pro se, by regular mail, postage prepaid as he has not provided the 

necessary information to serve via electronic filing through ECF. 

 /s/ Heather Neville

 Heather Neville 

 

 

Case 1:08-cv-00317-JM Document 7 Filed 11/26/08 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 23** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements:     (1) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-127600)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Director Deferred Compensation    Plan,     (2) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-116414)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan,     (3) Registration Statements    (Form S-8    Nos.    333-115948    and    333-115949)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Retirement Savings Plan,     (4) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 33-56403)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan,     (5) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-69194)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1997 Long-term Incentive    Plan, and     (6) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-74426)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Plan for the Deferral of    Directors’ Compensation;     of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements and schedule of Milacron Inc.,    Milacron Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, and the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of    Milacron Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2006.     Cincinnati, Ohio    March 8, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-07-PB

Carlos Santiago, Jr.

O R D E R

The defendant has moved, through counsel, to continue the

trial scheduled for August 18, 2009, citing the need for

additional time to finalize a plea agreement. The government

does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 18, 2009 to October 6, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00007-PB Document 16 Filed 07/27/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 27, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 23, 2009 at 3:45 p.m.

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 27, 2009

cc: Adam Bernstein, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00007-PB Document 16 Filed 07/27/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



   As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
   incorporation of our report dated February 7, 1997, included in the
   Carrington Laboratories, Inc., Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
   1996, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on
   Form S-8 (File No. 33-64403 and File No.33-64405).  It should be noted
   that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company
   subsequent to December 31, 1996, or perform any audit procedures
   subsequent to the date of our report.


   Arthur Anderson LLP
   Dallas, Texas
   March 25, 1997
<PAGE>
1 Plaintiff also seeks to invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1332 as a

jurisdictional basis; however, this cannot be a basis for

exercising jurisdiction because there is not complete diversity

between plaintiff and all defendants. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332

(setting forth elements of diversity jurisdiction).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel E. Hall

v. 08-cv-101-JL

Kent A. Brooks, et al.

O R D E R

As plaintiff brought this action pro se, his complaint is

before me for preliminary review to determine whether this

court’s subject matter jurisdiction has been invoked. See U.S.

District Court District of New Hampshire Local Rule (“LR”)

4.3(d)(1)(A). Plaintiff bases this action on the Racketeer

Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1962,

et seq., and properly cites the federal question jurisdictional

statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The filing, therefore, is sufficient

to establish this court’s subject matter jurisdiction.1

Accordingly, I order the Clerk’s office to issue the

necessary summonses against the defendants to enable this action

to proceed. See LR 4.3(d)(1)(A). Plaintiff shall complete

Case 1:08-cv-00101-JL Document 3 Filed 03/20/08 Page 1 of 2
2

service within 120 days following issuance of the summonses as

provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c). Service shall include the

summons, a copy of the complaint (document no. 1) and this order. 

Defendants shall answer or otherwise plead within twenty

days from the date of service. 

Plaintiff is referred to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, which requires

that every pleading after the complaint and every written motion,

notice, and similar paper be served on all parties, which service

shall be made by mailing it to the parties’ attorney(s). 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Justo Arenas 

Justo Arenas

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 20, 2008

cc: Daniel E. Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00101-JL Document 3 Filed 03/20/08 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 134




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the annual period ended December 31,
2007 containing financial statements (periodic report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
    
    the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.
 Date: February 29, 2008
    
    /s/ Robert E. James, Jr.

Robert E. James, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
 135
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007...... 100.0 3.2 12.3 36.6 29.4 11.8 4.5 2.2 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2003: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.3 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.7 4.6 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.4 6.6 .9 .7  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 1.5 .3 .2  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 2.5 .6 .3  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Richard L. Duncan

v. Case No. 08-cv-477-SM

Andrew Newcome, et al.

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 13, 2009, no objection having been filed, for the reasons

set forth therein. Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

February 4, 2009 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Richard L. Duncan, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00477-SM Document 11 Filed 02/04/09 Page 1 of 1
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, February 2-6, Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,637,936 33,730 78,913 95,886 148,432 289,7Number of loans 19,597 6,238 5,199 2,830 2,165 1,9Weighted average maturity (months)1 17.34 8.86 12.29 15.10 16.12 17.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 6.54 2.21 4.64 6.08 6.11 5.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.27 3.13 3.07 3.01 3.05 3.

Weighted average interest rate4 4.85 5.15 5.03 4.84 4.77 4. Standard error5 .28 .14 .12 .12 .12 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.18 6.18 6.17 6.02 6.00 5.7 25th percentile 3.30 4.04 3.82 3.56 3.30 3.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.53 4.82 5.17 5.58 4.34 4.7 Other livestock 3.49 5.39 4.95 4.07 3.82 2. Other current operating expenses7 5.27 5.24 5.15 4.94 5.12 4.

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.25 6.38 5.80 5.97 4.97 4. Farm real estate 5.51 5.66 5.38 4.91 6.23 5.4 Other8 3.55 4.08 3.79 3.88 3.83 3.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 64.70 79.99 77.13 76.49 73.35 73. Under commitment 79.17 88.82 83.26 80.98 77.36 76.7 Callable 11.19 29.04 25.52 24.64 23.43 23.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.02 5.28 5.37 9.02 9.17 6. Other livestock 5.50 5.74 6.67 6.54 5.79 4. Other current operating expenses7 62.98 74.96 68.99 57.48 56.78 57. Farm machinery and equipment 3.86 3.66 7.06 7.70 4.87 5.4 Farm real estate 5.84 .41 .63 1.85 4.72 4. Other8 17.80 9.94 11.29 17.42 18.68 21.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 10.83 4.52 6.79 6.73 11.48 13. Other 87.06 89.91 89.65 90.13 84.87 83. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
#### Bella Davis, Respondent, v Michael Melnicke, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 671]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered August 15, 2005, which (1) granted a petition to compel arbitration, appointed a third arbitrator and directed the parties to proceed to a hearing before a special referee concerning the extension of a previously granted temporary restraining order, and (2) denied respondent Melnicke’s motion for change of venue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The language of the contract at issue was clear and unambiguous that in the event the two arbitrators selected by the parties were stalemated in appointing a third rabbinical arbitrator within 15 days, a court of competent jurisdiction could be asked to make that appointment. Contrary to respondent’s contention, the court’s enforcement of the arbitration clause pursuant to CPLR article 75 did not constitute an impermissibly excessive entanglement in religion, since no doctrinal issue was decided by the court and no interference with religious authority will result *(see Avitzur v Avitzur,*58 NY2d 108 [1983], *cert denied*464 US 817 [1983]).

Regarding venue, respondent has numerous ties to New York County (CPLR 7502 [a]), including the location of the contract execution, the escrow account for the down payment, and the office of counsel designated for the closing of the transaction.

*504We have considered respondent’s remaining argument and find it without merit, since the orders appealed from do not involve the injunctive relief on which this argument is based. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1






SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18 U.S.
C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Gary F
Kimmons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
eDoorways Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/S/ Gary
F Kimmons






-------------------------------






Gary F
Kimmons






Chief
Executive Officer






July 3,
2008






This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|                                       |   | State of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                       |   | or Formation           |
| Subsidiaries of The Dress Barn,      Inc.  |   |                   |
|                                       |   |                   |
| D.B.R.,      Inc.                          |   | Delaware               |
|                                       |   |                   |
| DBX      Inc.                              |   | New      York          |
|                                       |   |                   |
| Dunnigan      Realty, LLC                  |   | Delaware               |
|                                       |   |                   |
| Dress      Barn Credit Management, LLC     |   | Virginia               |
|                                       |   |                   |
| Maurices      Incorporated                 |   | Delaware               |
|                                       |   |                   |
| Subsidiaries of Maurices      Incorporated |   |                   |
|                                       |   |                   |
| Maurices      Credit Management, Inc.      |   | Virginia               |

----
Exhibit 23.1


         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM

 We have issued our report dated March 3, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
 financial  statements  and  schedule  included  in  the  Annual  Report   of
 Carrington Laboratories, Inc.  on Form 10-K  for the year ended December 31,
 2004.  We hereby  consent  to the incorporation  by reference of said report
 in  the Registration Statements  of Carrington  Laboratories, Inc.  on  Form
 S-8 (File  No. 333-118303  effective  August 17, 2004,  File No.  333-118304
 effective August 17, 2004,  File No. 333-89760 effective June 4, 2002,  File
 No. 333-69372  effective  September 14, 2001,  File No.  33-64403  effective
 November 17, 1995, File No. 33-64405  effective November 17, 1995, File  No.
 33-64407 effective November 17, 1995,  File No. 33-55920 effective  December
 18, 1992, File  No. 33-50430  effective August  4, 1992,  File No.  33-42002
 effective August 1, 1991, File No. 33-36041 effective July 30, 1990 and File
 No. 33-22849 effective  June 30, 1988)  and on Form  S-3 (File No.  33-60833
 effective July 11, 1995 and File No. 33-57360 effective February 17, 1993).

 GRANT THORNTON LLP

 Dallas, Texas
 March 3, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Joseph Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-00328-JL

Northern NH Correctional

Facility, Warden

 O R D E R

The matter is taken under advisement.

What the court is interested in knowing whether, under state

law, the petitioner is entitled to a copy of the Presentence

Investigation Report in his case "for the asking" from either the

Superior Court or from the Department of Corrections. In other

words, the court is not inclined to order production if the

report is available to the petitioner at his request. If it is

not available upon a convicted defendant's request, the court

needs to be apprised of what showing must be made, under state

law, to entitle the petitioner to a copy of the report.

The parties shall so advise the court on or before November

29, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: November 18, 2010 

cc: Gerard Joseph Bean, pro se

Elizabeth C. Woodcock, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 91 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

USA

v. Case No. 08-mc-89-PB

Joseph V. Metallic

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated

February 27, 2009, no objection having been filed. 

The taxpayer, Joseph V. Metallic, is ordered to obey the summons and appear before

Denise Anderson on April 13, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. at 1000 Elm Street, Suite 900, Manchester,

New Hampshire, to give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession or control

required and called for by the terms of the summons of August 14, 2008. 

It is further ordered that the government be awarded its costs. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: March 24, 2009 /s/ Paul J. Barbadoro

Paul J. Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Gretchen Leah Witt, AUSA

Joseph V.Metallic

Case 1:08-mc-00089-PB Document 7 Filed 03/24/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This document contains summary financial information extracted from the attached
quarterly  report  on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  June  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         367
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                   396
<INVENTORY>                                    29,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               61,922
<PP&E>                                         19,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          46,103
<BONDS>                                        33,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       143
<OTHER-SE>                                     43,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,356
<SALES>                                        74,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               74,708
<CGS>                                          54,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,457
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,643
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.46
        

</TABLE>