alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
                                  Estimated volume                 Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                              
1993......    |          24       2        4        7       11      .121      .010      .018     .035     .054
1994......    |          10       1        1        3        6      .048      .003      .003     .013     .026
1995......    |          12       0        3        6        4      .055     -.001      .011     .027     .016
1996......    |           7       0        1        2        4      .031      .000      .003     .009     .017
1997......    |          16      -1        0        3       14      .064     -.003     -.001     .010     .054
1998......    |           6      -1        3        0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0        3        5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12        3        8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10        9        5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8        6        5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4        6        8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |        n.a.       1     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .003      n.a.     n.a.     n.a.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained inthis periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc.

 
| Date: August 21, 2006 | /s/ W. BRADLEY BLAIR, II                            |   |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | W. Bradley Blair, II                                |
|                  | *President and Chief Executive Officer*             |
|                  |                                                |
| Date: August 21, 2006 | /s/ SCOTT D. PETERS                                 |   |
|                  | Scott D. Peters                                     |
|                  | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         This appointment is effective on September 25, 2008.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven G. Rappold, Human Resources Services Division (NAH), National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001, (301) 837-2084.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive performance.

The members of the Performance Review Board for the National Archives and Records Administration are: Adrienne C. Thomas, Deputy Archivist of the United States, Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist for Records Services—Washington, DC, and Martha A. Morphy, Assistant Archivist for Information Services. These appointments supersede all previous appointments.

Dated: September 22, 2008.

Allen Weinstein,

Archivist of the United States.

[FR Doc. E8-22684 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-75-01-PB

Jacob D. Silva

O R D E R

I recuse myself from presiding over this case. The case

shall be assigned to another judge. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 11, 2009

cc: Helen Fitzgibbon, Esq.

Peter J. Anderson, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00075-JD Document 21 Filed 06/11/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert V . Towle

V .

David Gotjen, et al.

Civil No. 08-cv-190-JL

ORDE R

On May 19, 2008, an Order was issued as to the payment of the filing fee, directing the sum

of $12.00 to be paid no later than June 19, 2008, and thereafter monies be paid as outlined .

To date, no payment has been received by the Court. On June 27, 2008, the Clerk's Office

checked with Inmate Accounts at the New Hampshire State Prison and was advised that they had not

received an Inmate Request Slip to process the initial fee.

It is, therefore, ordered that the case be dismissed for want of prosecution .

SO ORDERED.

July 8, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. La lp ante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Robert V . Towle, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00190-JL Document 6 Filed 07/08/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-493-JL

William Albrecht

O R D E R

Kevin Hall is hereby granted in forma pauperis status.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 21, 2009

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00493-JL Document 15 Filed 04/21/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 09-cr-60-1 SM

Eric Richards

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial for approximately 90 days

(document no. 10) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the August trial period.

Defendant shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 26, 2009. On

the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: July 24, 2009 at 3:00 PM 

Jury Selection: August 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Case 1:09-cr-00060-SM Document 11 Filed 05/14/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

May 14, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00060-SM Document 11 Filed 05/14/09 Page 2 of 2
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          59
          8
          16
          12
          24
          .124
          .017
          .035
          .026
          .0482006
          73
          9
          7
          23
          34
          .146
          .018
          .015
          .045
          .0642007
          90
          8
          13
          23
          47
          .170
          .014
          .025
          .042
          .0852008
          150
          12
          20
          42
          75
          .269
          .022
          .037
          .074
          .1292009
          435
          65
          59
          151
          159
          .743
          .111
          .108
          .265
          .2712010
          n.a.
          153
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .262
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 6, 2010
**Exhibit 31.2**
103

 

**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Robert O. Bratton, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First CharterCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
     (a) Designed controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
     (b) [Intentionally omitted]
     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. Date: March 10, 2004     /s/ Robert O. Bratton   Robert O. Bratton Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer
104
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jeffrey Carano

v. Case No. 07-cv-124-PB

State of New Hampshire, et al.

O R D E R

Having reviewed the defendants’ motion to dismiss and the

plaintiff’s objection, I agree with the defendants that plaintiff

is seeking to challenge the viability of a state court judgment

in federal court in a manner that is barred by the Rooker-Feldman

doctrine. Accordingly, I grant defendants’ motion to dismiss the

complaint without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to challenge the

state court ruling in state court. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

November 30, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Carano, pro se

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00124-PB Document 17 Filed 11/30/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS  OF THE  DECEMBER  31,  1997  FORM  10K OF  VISTA  PROPERTIES  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,569,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,175,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,037,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    221,698,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (114,464,757)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               110,037,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,101,659
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,915,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,570,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,416,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,801,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,801,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2214

VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, INC.,

 Petitioner,

 versus

RICHARD BRYANT; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

 Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(BRB 02-0792)

Submitted: May 28, 2004 Decided: June 24, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

F. Nash Bilisoly, IV, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia,

for Petitioner. Howard M. Radzely, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S.

Shire, Associate Solicitor, Mark A. Reinhalter, Counsel for

Longshore, Kathleen H. Kim, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Washington, D.C., for Director, OWCP.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Virginia International Terminals, Inc., seeks review of

the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the

administrative law judge’s denial of relief from liability for

disability benefit payments pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 908(f) (2000).

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is

based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Va.

Int’l Terminals, Inc. v. Bryant, No. 02-0792 (BRB Aug. 7, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations                  of the Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |   |                                                 |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |   | /s/ Andrew Cimerman                        |
|                                     |   |   | Andrew Cimerman                                 |
|                                     |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                |   |   |                                                 |
| Date: April 21, 2008 |   |   |                                                 |

----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations                  of the Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |   |   |                              |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                           |   |   | /s/ Marie M. May   |
|                                           |   |   | Marie M. May            |
|                                           |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                                      |   |   |                              |
| Date:  April 21, 2008 |   |   |                              |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chan Rodriguez, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 299]

Judgment, *496Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about March 3, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

We have considered the contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ.