alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANICAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000717720
<NAME> VALUE LINE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          47,933
<SECURITIES>                                    19,044
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (133)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,787
<PP&E>                                          19,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,169)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,198
<SALES>                                         58,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,242
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,698
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,698
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.38


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                             CRAGAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
                  Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Share


Earnings (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                 --------------------------   -------------------------
                                                     2002           2001          2002          2001
                                                 -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
Income (loss) from continuing operations
<S>                                              <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>
Income (Loss)                                    $   (41,370)   $    21,613   $   247,679   $    80,066
Less:  Preferred Stock Dividends in Arrears             --             --            --            --
                                                 -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
Income (loss) available to Common Stockholders   $   (41,370)   $    21,613   $   247,679   $    80,066
                                                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Basic EPS - Weighted Average
         Shares  Outstanding                       3,897,611      3,633,422     3,897,611     3,612,744
                                                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Basic Earnings (loss) Per Share                  $     (0.01)   $      0.01   $      0.06   $      0.02
                                                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Basic EPS - Weighted Average
         Shares  Outstanding                       3,897,611      3,633,422     3,897,611     3,612,744

Effect of Diluted Securities:
         Stock options and Warrants                     --        1,817,054          --       1,822,823
         Convertible Preferred Stock                    --             --            --            --
                                                 -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
Diluted EPS - Weighted Average
         Shares Outstanding                        3,897,611      5,450,476     3,897,611     5,435,567
                                                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Diluted Earmings Per Share                       $     (0.01)   $      0.00   $      0.06   $      0.01
                                                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 189

To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. STUMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Administration

A BILL

To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION

4 ACT OF 1993.

5 The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42

6 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq.) is repealed.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

SDC Solutions, Inc. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-cv-00089-JL 

v. ) 

 ) 

Amcom Software, Inc. ) 

And David R. Manley, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

 ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ ASSENTED-TO

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING JUNE 4, 2008 HEARING

 The Court, having considered Defendants’ Assented-To Motion for Clarification 

Regarding June 4, 2008 Hearing, issues the following Order:

1. Following the June 4, 2008 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary and 

Permanent Injunction, Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead will make a 

recommendation and proposed findings only regarding Plaintiff’s request for 

preliminary injunctive relief. The parties shall have an opportunity to conduct 

discovery before a hearing is held on Plaintiff’s request for permanent injunctive 

relief. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ___________________ By: 

 

Case 1:08-cv-00089-JL Document 19 Filed 05/30/08 Page 1 of 1
H. R. 1914

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To extend for 4 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11

of the United States Code is reenacted.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105–277,

as amended by Public Law 106–5, Public Law 106–70, and Public

Law 107–8, is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘June 1, 2001’’ each place it appears and

inserting ‘‘October 1, 2001’’, and

(2) in subsection (a)—

(A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘May

31, 2001’’, and

(B) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘June

1, 2001’’.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on June

1, 2001.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1925 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 581
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1925

                          [Report No. 107-264]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 15 (legislative day, May 9), 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 9, 2002

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, 
     as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAMMOTH SITE AREA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
State of Texas, the city of Waco, and other appropriate organizations, 
shall carry out a special resource study regarding the national 
significance, suitability, and feasibility of designating the Waco 
Mammoth Site Area located in the city of Waco, Texas, as a unit of the 
National Park System.
    (b) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-
383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and completion of 
the study required by this section.

SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF STUDY RESULTS.

    Not later than 3 years after funds are first made available for 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources of 
the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report describing the results of the study.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 581

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1925

                          [Report No. 107-264]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
 feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, 
     as a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 9, 2002

                       Reported without amendment
```
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation in the Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2334

___________

Tracey Toles, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Northern District of Iowa.

*

Coastal Mart, Inc.; Mark Thornburg, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 29, 2004

Filed: May 12, 2004

___________

Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tracey Toles appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her action brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Iowa Civil Rights

Act. Toles sued her former employer, Coastal Mart, Inc., and its area manager, Mark

Thornburg, claiming race discrimination. Having carefully reviewed the record, see

Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002), we affirm. 
-2-

Specifically, we reject Toles’s argument that the district court erred by

concluding defendants’ actions were insufficient to create a trialworthy hostile-workenvironment claim, see Burkett v. Glickman, 327 F.3d 658, 662 (8th Cir. 2003) (for

hostile-work-environment claim to succeed, alleged conduct must be so extreme as

to change terms and conditions of employment); and we also reject her contention

that the district court improperly declined to consider her retaliation claim, see Speer

v. Rand McNally & Co., 123 F.3d 658, 665 (7th Cir. 1997) (district court was well

within its discretion not to permit plaintiff to proceed on new theory, raised first in

summary judgment resistance, as discovery had ended and summary judgment ruling

was pending). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1994...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

1996: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.7 1.6 2.1 1.0 1.2

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 3.0 1.1 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**June 2007**

Section B
Section C

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Summary Charts    PDF (11 KB)CSV (5 KB) Section AAmount and Characteristics of Farm Loans Made by Commercial Banks    A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank LoansASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (9 KB)  A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank LoansASCII (6 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (11 KB)  A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank LoansASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (10 KB)  A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank LoansASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (10 KB)  A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate BankASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (9 KB)  A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest RateASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (11 KB)  A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm LoansASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (4 KB)  A.8. All Banks, by Size of LoanASCII (7 KB)PDF (5KB)Screen ReaderCSV (25 KB)  A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of LoanASCII (4 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (24 KB)  A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm LendersASCII (4 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (24 KB)  A.11. All Banks, by Risk RatingASCII (4 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (27 KB)  A.12. Large Farm LendersASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (25 KB)  A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm LendersASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (25 KB)  A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey ResultsASCII (5 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (5 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releasesHome |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: June 22, 2007**
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 21, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William Carey Carlberg, Jr.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-230-JL

N.H. Department of Safety, et al.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

Because Kelly A. Ayotte, the New Hampshire Attorney General,

is on my recusal list, and because John J. Barthelmes, the

Commissioner for the Department of Safety, is the husband of my

judicial assistant, I hereby recuse myself from presiding over

this case, and request that the clerk reassign this matter. 

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 11, 2008

cc: William Carey Carlberg, Jr., pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00230-PB Document 3 Filed 06/11/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Home Insurance Company in Liquidation, Appellant, v Accident and Casualty Insurance Company of Winterthur Switzerland, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[807 NYS2d 348]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered April 27, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion to enforce its settlement agreement with defendant Accident and Casualty Insurance Company of Winterthur Switzerland, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While there is no question as to plaintiffs right to recover from Winterthur the amount stated in the plain language of the settlement agreement, and indeed defendant does not deny plaintiffs right to recover such amount, final execution of the agreement should await a determination of Winterthur’s claimed setoffs in plaintiffs liquidation *(see generally Lyons v Cates Consulting Analysts,*88 AD2d 526 [1982], *affd*64 NY2d 1025 [1985]), at which time plaintiffs recovery might be in the form of a credit for the amount in the agreement. As the motion court held, the waiver against setoffs contained in the settlement agreement was limited to setoffs “arising out of or in con*349nection with or in relation to the Faculatative Certificate and the Additional Faculatative Certificates with respect to the AT&T Settlement Agreement,” which are not the setoffs which defendant asserts. Although Winterthur did not plead such setoffs in its answer, such lapse is excusable under the circumstances of this case where the liquidation order giving rise to the need to claim such setoffs was not rendered until after the filing of the note of issue in this action. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.