alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2006...... 49.71 65.53 59.36 32.84 74.12 138.48 4.90 14.96 46.68 340.26 2007...... 48.27 64.93 50.33 36.27 47.41 117.22 5.35 15.11 46.62 302.38 2004: Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Q2... 42.75 70.57 38.44 23.68 78.69 132.29 3.95 14.60 46.31 371.83  Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45 2006: Q1... 43.76 45.56 49.62 37.78 39.28 96.24 3.81 15.09 47.28 288.50  Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Q3... 51.48 81.93 89.64 26.57 50.49 172.18 5.41 15.01 45.16 377.96  Q4... 53.61 80.54 57.82 33.44 71.05 155.58 5.56 14.96 48.79 341.00 2007: Q1... 58.33 76.05 54.29 50.88 32.69 120.07 5.34 15.10 47.15 296.76  Q2... 39.55 48.25 33.93 32.08 41.55 95.17 5.40 15.11 45.96 276.68  Q3... 42.93 42.18 63.99 28.28 62.22 108.75 5.26 15.19 45.88 296.12  Q4... 54.29 84.90 53.85 36.07 53.00 145.08 5.39 15.03 47.47 335.44 2008: Q1... 66.99 70.42 57.84 57.17 37.17 152.28 5.63 15.42 46.38 339.22  Q2... 53.03 64.25 58.32 39.04 59.60 127.92 5.40 14.76 46.37 310.75  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 1 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 2 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 3 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 4 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 5 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 6 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 7 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 8 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00464-SM   Document 3   Filed 02/13/09   Page 9 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-110-01-PB

Robert Mason

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for March 3, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from March 3, 2009 to May 5, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00110-PB Document 15 Filed 02/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 18, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 21, 2009 at 4:15 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 18, 2009

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00110-PB Document 15 Filed 02/18/09 Page 2 of 2
II

Calendar No. 290

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

DECEMBER 13, 2001

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

AN ACT

To require a report on the operations of the State Justice

Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2048 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPORT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL ON STATE

2 JUSTICE INSTITUTE.

3 Section 213 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984

4 (42 U.S.C. 10712) is amended by striking ‘‘On October

5 1, 1987’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than October 1, 2002’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 290

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048

AN ACT

To require a report on the operations of the State

Justice Institute

DECEMBER 13, 2001

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 32.2

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Kevan D. Bloomgren, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  February 12, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Kevan D. Bloomgren  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Kevan D. Bloomgren      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-149-01-SM

Hong Bach Nguyen

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial for 30 days (document no.

17) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2009 trial period. Defendant

shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than June 19, 2009. On the filing

of such waiver, the continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:08-cr-00149-SM Document 18 Filed 06/08/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: July 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM 

Jury Selection: July 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

June 8, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00149-SM Document 18 Filed 06/08/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v.

Roger Forand

Criminal No. 06-cr-176-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

9) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: January 18, 2007

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Clyde Garrigan, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00176-JD Document 10 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 1
To account for rapid performance gains in microprocessors (MPUs), the central processing units in computers, a hedonic price index was developed.  Hedonic price indexes use product characteristics data to estimate the product price holding quality constant.			

Prices for specific MPU models were collected from published wholesale price lists (1,000 unit trays) from Intel Corp.  (See http://www.intc.com/pricelist.cfm)  MPU scores on "benchmarks"—programs designed to test performance on common computing tasks—were used from System Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC).  For an overall performance score, a geometric mean of composite scores for integer and floating point benchmark tests was used.   (See http://www.spec.org)

To account for changes in the mix of computing end-use markets over time, the hedonic regression includes MPU product class (e.g. mainstream, performance, extreme) as reported by IDC Corp.  (See "IDC PC Processors by Intended PC System Type", December, 2012.)  To account for the impact on performance from other features of the computer used to test the MPU, the hedonic regression includes system memory; system vendor (e.g. Dell, IBM); and, for server systems, number of processors.  The log-price of each MPU model was regressed on the performance score, control variables and quarterly dummy variables.  Coefficients on the dummy variables were used to construct a price index.

Separate indexes were created for MPUs used in desktop PCs and servers.  Mobile system MPUs were not included because of limited data availability and the relatively small share of domestic production for this class of chips.  Desktop and server indexes were weighted by global revenue shares reported by IDC Corp. to create a composite index.			

Only prices reported on the first introduction of each model are employed to mitigate concern that transaction prices reflect discounts that evolve over the life of the model.  (Many list prices were unchanged when closely-related new models with better performance were introduced.)  The date of model introduction was based on company statements.  (See http://ark.intel.com/ )
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (115 KB)
CSV (103 KB)

----

**December 2007**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (115 KB) |CSV (103 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: December 21, 2007**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

James Flanders

Criminal No . 08-cr-162-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

20) filed by defendant is granted in part . The continuance is

limited to 60 days .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : April 7, 200 9

cc : Glenn Geiger, Esq .

Terry Ollila, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00162-JD Document 21 Filed 04/07/09 Page 1 of 1
THIS NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, AND IS TRANSFERABLE ONLY UPON THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE
NOTE AGREEMENT REFERRED TO HEREIN.

                Promissory Note Due April 30, 2004

                                                                   $13,000.00

      GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC, a Delaware public corporation, (herein
called the "Maker") for value received, hereby promises to pay to JOEL PICKELL
or his registered assigns ("Holder"), the principal sum of ten thousand
dollars ($13,000.00) and annualized interest of 0 %.  Payment of the principal
and interest of this Note will be made by check on April 30, 2004 (unless
extended) at the offices of the Maker maintained in Houston, Texas, or mailed
to the address of the person entitled thereto as such address shall be
provided to the Maker, in such coin or currency of the United States of
America.

      This Note shall be collateralized by three hundred ninety three thousand
nine hundred thirty nine  (393,939) shares of common stock in GK Intelligent
Systems, Inc. currently registered in the name of "GK Intelligent Systems".
Holder may, at its option, accept payment of all or part of the principal
portion of this Note in the form of the heretofore described common stock on a
pro rata basis using a price per share of $.033 cents.  Holder may make this
election on or before the due date of April 30, 2004.

      No provision of this Note shall alter or impair the obligation of the
Maker, which is absolute and unconditional, to pay the principal of this Note
at the times, places and rate, and in the coin or currency, herein prescribed.

      The Note may be transferred upon surrender of this Note or registration
of transfer at the offices or agencies of the Maker in Houston, Texas duly
endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in
substantially the form accompanying this Note duly executed by, the holder
hereof or his attorney duly authorized in writing, and thereupon one or more
new Notes, of authorized denominations and for the same aggregate principal
amount, will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees.

      Prior to due presentment of this Note for registration of transfer, the
Maker, and any agent of the Maker may treat the person in whose name this Note
is registered as the owner hereof for all purposes, whether or not this Note
be overdue, and neither the Maker nor any such agent shall be affected by
notice to the contrary.

      This Note represents the final agreement between the parties and may not
be contradicted by evidence of prior, contemporaneous, or subsequent oral
agreements of the parties.  There are no unwritten oral agreements between the
parties.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GARY KIMMONS, CEO of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
has caused this instrument to be executed.

Dated:  March 31, 2004.

                                     /s/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    GARY KIMMONS, CEO, GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 18, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States 

v. Case No. 08-cr-92-01-SM

Moses Ehiabhi

ORDER

Re: Document No. 22, Motion for Sentencing Transcript

Ruling: Denied. Defendant’s motion for a free sentencing

transcript must be denied. Defendant has not made the requisite

showing that a sentencing transcript is necessary to pursue a

direct appeal of his conviction and sentence, because no appeal was

filed within the time allowed. And, to secure a free transcript to

support a collateral relief petition (e.g. under the provisions of

28 U.S.C. Section 2255), defendant must first show that such a

petition has some merit. Ellis v. State of Maine, 448 F.2d 1325,

1327 (1st Cir. 1971). And, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

Section 753(f), the court would be required, before providing

defendant with free transcripts, to certify that defendant’s appeal

or collateral relief petition, is not frivolous, and the

transcripts are needed to decide an issue presented by the appeal

or motion. No appeal was filed and no collateral relief petition

is pending, and defendant has said nothing about what issues he

might raise and why a transcript would be necessary to fairly 

adjudicate those issues.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: September 22, 2009

cc: Moses Ehiabhi, pro se

Jennifer Davis, AUSA

Jessica Brown, Esq. 

Case 1:08-cr-00092-SM Document 23 Filed 09/22/09 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Robert H. Daskal, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Robert H. Daskal


Robert
      H.
      Daskal


Chief
      Financial Officer


October
      25, 2006
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TENNYSON REID
, Appellant,

v.

INA ESQUIVAL

- KONIECZY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 159

[ April 29, 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jane D. Fishman , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. CACE18

- 27553

and COWE18

- 5405

.

Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Dara L. Schottenfeld of David J. Schottenfeld, P.A., Plantation , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., c oncur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.