alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNION HOSIERY CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. J. RABINOWITZ CO., Defendant and Appellant.

No. 13867.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 11, 1932.

Sol Weiss, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Ellis Henican, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit for $339, the alleged purchase price of 200 dozen pair of golf hose which plaintiff claims to have sold defendant through its agent one L. M. Oressy. The purchase of the golf hose is admitted by defendant, but it is claimed that. the price charged is $80 too much. In other words, instead of having bought the hose for $1.65 per dozen as plaintiff claims, defendant maintains that the .price agreed upon was $1.25 per dozen.

The trial court gave judgment for plaintiff as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

Able counsel for defendant, conscious of the presumption which favors the correctness of the ruling of a trial judge upon a question of fact, points out that plaintiff, with the burden of proof resting upon it, is supported only by its salesman, Oressy; whereas two witnesses, Mr. Rabinowitz, defendant’s president, and Miss Adams, defendant’s stenographer, maintain the position of defendant. But the learned judge, a quo, found the testimony of Mr. Rabinowitz and that of Miss Adams unsatisfactory, and in his reasons for judgment, pointed to certain features of their evidence affecting its credibility. On the other hand, Oressy, it appears, had been a -salesman in similar 'lines for thirty-eight years. He noted the price agreed upon in his sales book at the time the sale was made. It is unlikely that he was in error or that he intentionally increased the price. The case is a close one. Happily the amount involved is small. The determining factor with us is the conclusion of the trial judge upon the question of fact involved.

Eor the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
Calendar No. 323

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2175

AN ACT

To protect infants who are born alive.

MARCH 14, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

IIB

Calendar No. 323

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2175

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 13, 2002

Received; read the first time

MARCH 14, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To protect infants who are born alive.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2175 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Born-Alive Infants

3 Protection Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘§ 8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’

9 as including born-alive infant

10 ‘‘(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Con11 gress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the

12 various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United

13 States, the words ‘person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘in14 dividual’, shall include every infant member of the species

15 homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of develop16 ment.

17 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘born alive’,

18 with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens,

19 means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or

20 her mother of that member, at any stage of development,

21 who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a

22 beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite

23 movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the

24 umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the

25 expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or

26 induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
3

•HR 2175 PCS

1 ‘‘(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to af2 firm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal

3 right applicable to any member of the species homo sapi4 ens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in

5 this section.’’.

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

7 at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

9 item:

‘‘8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’ as including born-alive infant.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 12,

2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Case 1:11-cv-02232-RPM Document 19 Filed 01/26/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2171 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2171

To require that the Bureau of the Census prepare and submit to Congress 
  a detailed plan for counting overseas Americans in future decennial 
                   censuses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

  Mr. Cannon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that the Bureau of the Census prepare and submit to Congress 
  a detailed plan for counting overseas Americans in future decennial 
                   censuses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTING OF OVERSEAS AMERICANS.

    (a) In General.--Effective as of the date of the enactment of this 
Act, neither the Department of Commerce nor any bureau or other unit of 
the Department of Commerce may obligate any amount to implement the 
survey which is commonly referred to as the ``2003 American Community 
Survey'', until all of the conditions under subsection (b) have been 
met.
    (b) Conditions.--The conditions under this subsection are as 
follows:
            (1) The Director of the Census has drafted and submitted to 
        the Secretary of Commerce a detailed, written plan for the 
        counting of overseas Americans in future decennial censuses of 
        population.
            (2) The Secretary of Commerce has certified to the 
        committees of Congress having legislative jurisdiction over the 
        census--
                    (A) that the Secretary has approved a plan 
                described in paragraph (1); and
                    (B) that all regulations necessary to implement 
                such plan have been promulgated.
            (3) The Secretary of Commerce has submitted to the 
        committees of Congress having legislative jurisdiction over the 
        census a written report justifying the decision of the Bureau 
        of the Census, in connection with the 1990 and 2000 censuses, 
        to count overseas Americans selectively.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21
**MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES OF LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC.**
     The following indicates the corporate names (and all other significant names, if any, underwhich business is conducted) and jurisdictions of incorporation of the subsidiaries of LafargeNorth America Inc., all of which are wholly-owned or majority-owned. Indirect subsidiaries ofLafarge North America are indented and listed following their direct parent corporations.   Name(s)  Jurisdiction of IncorporationAmerican Transport Leasing, Inc. DelawareCement Transport, Ltd. North DakotaFriday Harbor Sand & Gravel Co. WashingtonInternational Atlantins Insurance Company VermontLafarge Dakota Inc. North DakotaLafarge Midwest, Inc. DelawareLafarge Presque Isle, Inc. DelawareMountain Prairie Insurance Company, Inc. VermontRedland Inc. DelawareLafarge Mid-Atlantic, Inc. DelawareLafarge West, Inc. DelawareLafarge Southwest, Inc. New MexicoSierra Bay Receivables Inc. NevadaSystech Environmental Corporation DelawareLafarge Canada Inc. CanadaGestion Carim Inc. QuebecInternational Atlantins Agencies Inc. British ColumbiaJohnson Concrete & Material Ltd. SaskatchewanLafarge Gypsum Canada Inc. CanadaLCI-Warren Merger Inc. CanadaLafarge Canada Finance Inc. CanadaThe Warren Paving & MaterialsGroup Limited OntarioLulu Transport Inc. British ColumbiaMitchell Park Ash Ltd. OntarioQuality Ready-Mix Limited OntarioRe-Wa Holdings Ltd. AlbertaRichvale York Block Inc. OntarioValley Rite-Mix Ltd. British Columbia
     Lafarge North America also does business under the following names: Florida Portland CementCompany, Lafarge Construction Materials, Lafarge Gypsum, Trinity Portland Cement Company.
     Lafarge Canada Inc. also does business under the following names: Alberta Concrete Products,Apex Gravel, Bestpipe, Canada Concrete, Capital Concrete, Challenge Concrete, Champion Concrete,Cinq Concrete, Coldstream Concrete, Columbia Concrete, Conmac Western Industries, Crown Equipment,Crown Paving and Engineering, Duracon, Francon-Lafarge, Great Lakes Flyash, High River Concrete,Johnston Ready Mix, Lafarge Concrete, Lafarge Construction Materials, Lafarge Gypsum, LethbridgeConcrete Products, Maritime Cement, Nelson Aggregate Co., O.K. Construction Materials,Permanent-Lafarge, Red-D-Mix Block, Richvale — McCord, Richvale — York, Rocky Mountain Precast,Standard Aggregates, Standard Asphalt, Supercrete, Trans-Alta Flyash.
     Information regarding approximately 85 additional subsidiaries of the Registrant has beenomitted because such subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, do notconstitute a “significant subsidiary” as defined in Rule 1-02(v) of Regulation S-X [17 CFR210.1-02(v)].
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, September 24, 2008, at 4:30 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Acting Secretary to the Commission, and certain staff members who have an interest in the matter will attend the Closed Meeting. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(8) and (9), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the item listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 24, 2008, will be: Matters related to the financial markets. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: September 24, 2008. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22858 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT 21

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation is the parent corporation of 328 subsidiaries which operate "off-price" retail stores in the United States.

Burlington Coat Factory Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation, which buys, sells and otherwise deals in real estate in connection with the Company's business.

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, which leases the Company's store in Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania to one of the Company's operating subsidiaries.

Monroe G. Milstein, Inc., a New York corporation, which operates a wholesale apparel business.

LC Acquisition Corp., a New York corporation, which owns an interest in a manufacturer of coats.

C.L.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company collects royalties from its subsidiaries for the use of its trade names.

C.F.B., Inc., a Delaware corporation, through which the Company provides financing for its subsidiaries for the acquisition of their merchandise inventory and store fixtures.

C.F.I.C. Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is an investment holding company.

Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, formed for direct marketing purposes.
218 La. 392

#### PRAMPIN et al. v. SOUTHERN CHEMICAL WORKS, Inc., et al. DIXIE LAND CO., Inc, v. BLYTHE et al.

Nos. 39262, 39263.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1950.

Fred G. Veith, New Orleans, George P. Lessley, New Orleans, for appellants.

Connolly & Simoneaux, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellees.

PONDER, Justice.

Albert and Achille Prampin brought suit against the Southern Chemical Works, Inc. and Joseph M. Cortinas seeking to have a tax deed in favor of the Southern Chemical Works for the unpaid city taxes of 1932 annulled and to have a patent acquired by Joseph M. Cortinas from the State of Louisiana of property previously adjudicated to the State for unpaid taxes decreed null and void. The Dixie Land Co., Inc. an assignee of the Southern Chemical Works, Inc. brought suit against Joseph A. Blythe and the Prampins seeking to confirm its title against them. The suits were consolidated for trial. The lower court gave judgment annulling the tax sales and the Southern Chemical Works, Inc., Cortinas and the Dixie Land Co., Inc. have appealed.

Upon examination oí the record, we find no proof as to the value of the property in controversy. There is no evidence in the record to indicate that we have appellate jurisdiction of these consolidated cases. On the hearing of the appeal, counsel were unable to point out any allegation, averment or evidence in the record establishing our jurisdiction. Since the hearing of the appeal, counsel for the Prampins has filed an affidavit of a real estate agent which is to the effect that in his opinion the property is worth $7500. This affidavit was filed with the view of establishing our jurisdiction. The affidavit is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court. It is nothing more that a conclusion or an opinion of the deponent. He gives no basis for the opinion and no facts are set forth to support the conclusion. The litigants have failed to prove affirmatively that the amount in controversy is sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court. New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co. v, Redmann, 210 La. 525, 27 So.2d 321.

Under the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912 we are authorized to transfer the appeal 'to the' Court of Appeal rather than dismiss it. Plauche et al. v. Albert, 215 La. 776, 41 So.2d 677; Thalheim v. Gruhler, 216 La. 502, 43 So.2d 907.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered that this case be transferred to the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans provided that the appellant shall file the record in such court within 30 days from the date on ■ which this decree shall become final ; otherwise the appeal shall stand dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1761 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 8588 Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Herb Harris 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 8588 Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, as the ``Herb Harris 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8588 
Richmond Highway in Alexandria, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Herb Harris Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herb Harris Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2175

AN ACT

To protect infants who are born alive.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2175

AN ACT

To protect infants who are born alive.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2175 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Born-Alive Infants

3 Protection Act of 2001’’.

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘§ 8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’

9 as including born-alive infant

10 ‘‘(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Con11 gress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the

12 various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United

13 States, the words ‘person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘in14 dividual’, shall include every infant member of the species

15 homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of develop16 ment.

17 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘born alive’,

18 with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens,

19 means the complete expulsion or extraction from his or

20 her mother of that member, at any stage of development,

21 who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a

22 beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite

23 movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the

24 umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the

25 expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or

26 induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.
3

•HR 2175 EH

1 ‘‘(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to af2 firm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal

3 right applicable to any member of the species homo sapi4 ens at any point prior to being ‘born alive’ as defined in

5 this section.’’.

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

7 at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

9 item:

‘‘8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’ as including born-alive infant.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 12,

2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
|   | (3) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Yinan Zhao                                                                                   |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Yinan      ZhaoActing      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financialand      Accounting Officer |

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending May 27, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANK OF FLOYD, THE                                                                                                      * BranchThe Bank of Floyd, Floyd, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 7349 Peppers Ferry Boulevard, Radford, Virginia.Newspaper: 06/10/2006Federal Register: Not applicableCAPITAL ONE BANK                                                                                                        InvestmentCapital One Bank, Glen Allen, Virginia, to increase its investment in Capital One Bank (Europe)plc, London, England.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableCAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                       * 3A5
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                          MERIDIAN NATIONAL CORPORATION
                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



                                                   State of Incorporation
      Subsidiary                                      or Organization
      ----------                                      ---------------

     Ottawa River Steel Company                          Ohio

     National Metal Processing, Inc.                     Michigan

     Meridian Environmental Services, Inc.               Michigan

     EPI Technologies, Inc.                              Delaware

     SUBSIDIARIES OF EPI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

          National Purification, Inc.                    Ohio

          MEPI Corp.                                     Ohio

     Environmental Purification Industries Company,      Ohio
          a general partnership 100% owned by
          National Purification, Inc. and MEPI Corp.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending July 7, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC, THE                                                                                   * 3A1