alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period      ended September 27, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;      and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 30, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/      KEVIN T. MICHAELS |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|                        |   |   |                       | Kevin      T. MichaelsChief      Financial OfficerPowerwave      Technologies, Inc. |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Docket No. AB-355 (Sub-No. 38X)] 

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of exemption. 

# SUMMARY:

Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board, on its own motion, is exempting a discontinuance from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 for Springfield Terminal Railway Company to discontinue its operations over an approximately 43.81-mile rail line extending from milepost 7.3 to milepost 51.11 in Cumberland and Oxford Counties, ME. This exemption is subject to employee protective conditions. 

# DATES:

The exemption is effective retroactively as of December 17, 1994. 

# ADDRESSES:

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Docket No. AB-355 (Sub-No. 38X), must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of all pleadings must be served on petitioner's representative: Robert B. Culliford, Pan Am Railways, Inc., Pease International Airport, Portsmouth, NH 03801. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 245-0395. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.] 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov.*

Decided: September 16, 2008. 

By the Board, Chairman Nottingham, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Buttrey. 

Anne K. Quinlan, 

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22222 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55513-55514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22501]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
10 a.m. on Friday, September 26, 2008, to consider the following 
matter:

Discussion Agenda

    Memorandum and resolution re: Simplification of Deposit Insurance 
Rules for Trust Accounts.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    This Board meeting will be Webcast live via the Internet and 
subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the 
event. Visit http://www.vodium.com/goto/fdic/boardmeetings.asp to view 
the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video 
Help page at: http://www.fdic.gov/video.html.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to 
make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed

[[Page 55514]]

to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 
(202) 898-7122.

    Dated: September 19, 2008.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22501 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Richard Patton, President, Chief Executive Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant
to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure
Capital Fund, LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Richard Patton                          
|G. Richard Patton                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|November 5, 2010                               

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will be retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Case 1:08-mc-00033-JM   Document 1   Filed 05/16/05   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-QSB
for  the  period  ended September 30, 2005,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., the Managing General Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XXI, Inc., each certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 4, 2005



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 4, 2005
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1257

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make the budget process

more transparent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 27, 2001

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms.

HARMAN, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. BOYD, Mr.

JOHN, Mr. TURNER, Mr. HILL, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. TANNER, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs.

TAUSCHER, Mr. HONDA, Mr. EVANS, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, and

Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to make

the budget process more transparent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Budg5 eting Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1257 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Congressional

3 Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the

4 following new section:

5 ‘‘TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENT

6 ‘‘SEC. 316. It shall not be in order in the House of

7 Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint

8 resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report

9 thereon, reducing revenues in which all changes in law

10 made by such measure are not completed by the fifth cal11 endar year beginning after the date of enactment of such

12 measure.’’.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con14 tents set forth in section 2(a) of the Congressional Budget

15 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by in16 serting after the item relating to section 315 the following

17 new item:

‘‘Sec. 316. Transparency requirement.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John L. Coleman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    John L. ColemanJohn L. Coleman, President and C.E.O. (Principal Executive Officer)




/s/     Elaine S. KendrickElaine S. Kendrick, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




November 14, 2003



22
#### Peter Muller et al., Respondents, v Waring Abbott, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[807 NYS2d 311]

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J), dated December 7, 2004, which denied his motion pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1) for an award of an attorney’s fee and costs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to award him relief under Civil Rights Law § 70-a (1), assuming that the action was properly characterized as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation *(see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown,*222 AD2d 513 [1995]). Cozier, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02006
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02007
          0
          0
          0
          0
          0 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 26, 2008
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2006: Q3... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.8

 Q4... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.7

2007: Q1... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.7

 Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

 Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

 Q3... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.6

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2006: Q3... 9.6 9.7 9.4 8.5

 Q4... 9.5 9.6 9.3 8.7

2007: Q1... 9.4 9.7 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

 Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.6 7.5 6.9

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2006: Q3... 9.3 9.2 8.8 8.6

 Q4... 9.3 9.3 8.9 8.4

2007: Q1... 9.1 9.0 8.6 8.3

 Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2

 Q3... 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.1
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q3... n.a. 9.2 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.2 9.0 8.4

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.0 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.9 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.8

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2006: Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.1 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 Q3... n.a. 7.1 7.6 7.4

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 D0 08 8 . STEVEN LEE CARGLE v . J ESSI CA N. HARVI LL.

Th e t ri al co u rt en t ered a fi n al ju d g m en t an d decree o f d i v o rce i n t h is act i o n o n J u l y 27

, 2 0 20

. On Oct o b er 9

, 2 0 2 0

, d efen d an t St ev en Carg l e fi l ed t h is ap pl i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew. W e l ack ju ri s di ct i on

. An ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev iew m u s t b e fi l ed w i th i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry

o f t h e j u d g m en t o r tri al co u rt o rd er s o u g ht t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e
req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d ict i o n al

, an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an
ap p li cat io n fo r ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m pl i an ce t h erewi t h

. See Bo yl e v. S ta t e , 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 34

, 73 4 (3 8 0 S E2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9). Carg l e fi l ed th i s ap p l i cat i o n m o re t h an t wo

m o nt h s aft er en t ry o f t h e d i v o rce d ecree he s eek s t o ap p eal

. Co n s eq u en t l y , t h i s

u n t i m el y ap p l i cat i on fo r di s cret i o n ary rev i ew is h ereb y DI S M I S S ED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

. See i d

. I f

, a s Carg l e ap p ears to su g g es t i n h i s ap pl i cat i o n , h is ri g h t to

t i m el y seek ap p el lat e rev i ew w as fru s t rat ed d u e t o a t ri al co u rt erro r, h is rem ed y i s to

p et i t i o n t he t ri al co u rt t o v acat e an d re-en t er t h e o rd er at i s s u e in th e m an n er d es cri b ed
i n Ca mb r o n v. Ca na l In s

. Co

. , 2 4 6 Ga. 1 4 7, 1 4 8 -1 4 9 (1 ) (2 6 9 SE2 d 4 26 ) (1 9 8 0 ),
d i s ap p ro v ed i n p art by W r ig h t v

. Y o u ng , 29 7 Ga. 6 8 3

, 6 8 4

, n

. 3 (7 7 7 SE2 d 4 7 5 ) (2 0 1 5).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 02, 2020

11/02/2020
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Frederick O. BOGAR, Appellant.

No. 02-3039.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 27, 2002.

Decided Jan. 10, 2003.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Frederick O. Bogar appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Western District of Arkansas after he pleaded guilty to distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced appellant to 144 months imprisonment, 3 years supervised release and a $3,500 fine. For reversal appellant argues the district court erred in applying an increase under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) for possession of a firearm in connection with the offense. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We find no clear error in the district court’s application of the increase. *See United States v. Frazier,*280 F.3d 835, 853 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), *cert. denied,*536 U.S. 931, 122 S.Ct. 2606, 153 L.Ed.2d 793 (2002). The evidence introduced at sentencing showed that there had been drug activity at Bogar’s residence, and officers searching the residence found a .357 Magnum pistol stuffed into a couch, near Bogar and a quantity of crack cocaine. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3) (firearm adjustment should be applied if weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that weapon was connected with offense); *United States v. Macklin,*104 F.3d 1046, 1048 (8th Cir.) (holding no clear error in applying in*237crease, given proximity of firearms to drugs, ease with which defendants could access firearms, ongoing drug trafficking at residence, and likely need for defendants to protect drugs and cash found at residence), *cert. denied,*522 U.S. 891, 118 S.Ct. 229, 139 L.Ed.2d 161 (1997). Even if Bogar did not actually possess the gun — as he contends — he was present when his son tried to hide it in the couch, and both the gun and the drugs were found in his residence. *See United States v. Payne,*81 F.3d 759, 762 (8th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Westem District of Arkansas.