alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Stephen Miner

v.

New Hampshire State Prison, Warden

No. 06-fp-450

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $24.60 is due no later than March

1, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the New

Hampshire State Prison when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv- 450-SM .

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 29, 2007

United States Magistrate Judge

__________________________

James R. Muirhead

cc: Stephen Miner, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

New Hampshire State Prison, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:06-cv-00450-SM Document 5 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), the undersigned, Kevan D. Bloomgren, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Kevan D. Bloomgren |
|------------------------|

Kevan D. Bloomgren

Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 14, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-129-01-SM

Anthony Rabbia

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 37) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2010 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than January 19, 2010. On the filing

of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM 

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 38 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: March 16, 2010 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

January 8, 2010 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 38 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2
#### CHARLES H. LEVY CO., Inc., v. ZOLLER’S, Inc.

No. 17360.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Nov. 17, 1941.

M. C. Scharff, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Owens & Levy and A. I. Kleinfeldt, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit on an open account in which the plaintiff, Charles H. Levy Company, Inc., claimed from the defendant, Zoller’s Inc., the sum of $105.41. The defendant admits owing the bill sued on, but alleges that it is subject to a credit of $19.-24, because of a discount to which it was entitled amounting to that sum. It tendered its check to the plaintiff in the sum of $86.17, in full settlement, which was rejected.

There was judgment below as prayed for and defendant has appealed.

It appears that Zoller’s, Inc., had been, for a number of years, doing business with Charles IT. Levy Company, a partnership, which was incorporated on June 23rd, 1939, prior to the origin of the account sued on. According to Bernard Zoller a discount of seven percent had been allowed by Levy on all purchases regardless of when they were paid and that this situation changed as soon as the business was incorporated. He is to some extent corroborated by his bookkeeper, Mrs. Leo Cassonova. On the other hand, Charles IT. Levy testified that Zoller’s, Inc., was not entitled to the discount unless its bills were paid within seventy days and that this particular bill was not paid within the discount period, consequently, it was not entitled to the credit.

In our opinion the defendant has failed to prove that it was customary for Chas. H. Levy Company, the partnership, to give it the discount claimed. We need not, therefore, consider the point raised by plaintiff to the effect that the corporation was not bound by the custom of the partnership.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John L. Coleman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John L. ColemanJohn L. Coleman, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: May 14, 2004



---



Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas L. Redding, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my Knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Elaine S. KendrickElaine S. Kendrick, C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




Date: May 14, 2004
Exhibit 24

Power of Attorney

Each person below designates and appoints ROBERT D. SZNEWAJS and ANDERS
GILTVEDT, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent, with full power of substitution, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, of West Coast Bancorp, an Oregon
corporation, and any amendments thereto, and to file said report and amendments,
with all exhibits thereto, in such form as they or either of them may approve
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Each person whose signature appears below also grants to these
attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to perform every act and
execute any instruments that they deem necessary or desirable in connection with
said report, as fully as he or she could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that the attorneys-in-fact and agents or their substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this power of attorney has been executed by each of
the undersigned as of the 22nd day of January, 2008.

| | Signature                        | Title                                   
| | -------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Lloyd D.
      Ankeny        |                                         
| | Lloyd D.
      Ankeny            | Director and
      Chairman of the Board
| |                                 
| | /s/ Michael
      J. Bragg       |                                         
| | Michael J.
      Bragg           | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ Duane C.
      McDougall     |                                         
| | Duane C.
      McDougall         | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ Steven J.
      Oliva        |                                         
| | Steven J.
      Oliva            | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ J.F.
      Ouderkirk         |                                         
| | J.F.
      Ouderkirk             | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ Steven N.
      Spence       |                                         
| | Steven N.
      Spence           | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ David J.
      Truitt        |                                         
| | David J.
      Truitt            | Director                                
| |                                 
| | /s/ Nancy A.
      Wilgenbusch   |                                         
| | Nancy A.
      Wilgenbusch, PhD. | Director                                

95

---
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 185 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 185

   To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment 
                    rights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment 
                    rights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Right To Know Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

    Title XI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``Sec. 1107. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
governmental authority shall in or through any program or activity, 
administered or assisted by such authority, that provides health care 
services or information, limit the right of any person to provide, or 
the right of any person to receive, nonfraudulent information about the 
availability of reproductive health care services, including family 
planning, prenatal care, adoption, and abortion services.
    ``(b) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `governmental authority' means any authority 
        of any State or of the United States; and
            ``(2) the term `State' includes the District of Columbia, 
        Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the 
        United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Michael Matthews, Petitioner, v New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Respondent.

[807 NYS2d 314]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated May 20, 2004, which adopted, in part, the recommendation of an Administrative Law Judge, made after a hearing, denying the petitioner’s permit application to construct a dock structure in a tidal wetland.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance with ECL 25-0404.

*711The determination of the respondent, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, must be confirmed, as it was supported by substantial evidence and was not arbitrary or capricious *(see Matter of Grimaldi v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation,*299 AD2d 410 [2002]; *Matter of Brotherton v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y.,*189 AD2d 814, 815 [1993]).

The record of the administrative hearing is insufficient to determine whether the denial of the petitioner’s application is so burdensome as to constitute a taking, in which case, the respondent must either grant the application or commence condemnation proceedings *(see*ECL 25-0404).

Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the wetlands regulations, coupled with the denial of the permit application, constituted an unconstitutional taking of the petitioner’s property *(see Matter of Grimaldi v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, supra*at 410-411; *Matter of Brotherton v Department of Envtl. Conservation of State of N.Y., supra*at 816; *see also Spears v Berle,*48 NY2d 254, 261, 264 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 USC, SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Oxford
Northeast Ltd., a New York corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge and
in the capacity of an officer, that:



The Annual Report for the year ended September 30, 2019
(the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.



|                        |                              
|----------------------- | -----------------------------
|Date: December 30, 2019 | /s/  Samuel Eisenberg        
|                        | Samuel Eisenberg             
|                        | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        | (Principal Financial Officer)
|                        |                              
|Date: December 30, 2019 | /s/  Abraham Miller          
|                        | Abraham Miller               
|                        | President                    
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer)
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 83.6 14.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008: Q1... 100.0 81.0 15.5 2.9 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .4 .1 .1

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

ISONICS CORPORATION

 

Certification pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350

Principal ExecutiveOfficer

 

To my knowledge: the quarterly report onForm 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006, containing financialstatements for the period then ended, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained inthe Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Isonics Corporation for the periodspresented.

 

 

March 17, 2006

 

 
| /s/ James E. Alexander              |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| James E. Alexander, Chief Executive |
| Officer                             |

 

----
##### 



LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
(As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2002)




---



##### 



SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN




---



##### 



Defined Terms
 Nature of Plan
 Administration
 -2-




---



##### 



Eligibility and Vesting
 Benefits
   -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



3 4 1 2
   -5-




---



##### 



(A)
    
    the monthly retirement income that would have been payable to
such Plan Participant, spouse or Beneficiary under the formula set forth in
subsection (a)(i) above, or(B)
    
    the monthly retirement income that would have been payable to
such Plan Participant, spouse or Beneficiary under the formula set forth in
subsection (b)(i) above had such income been computed as if the Participant were a
 -6-




---



##### 



Participant in the 1989 Restatement as of the date of his
retirement, vested termination or death (as applicable), using Credited
Service as determined under the 1989 Restatement and Final Average Earnings
as determined under the 2002 Restatement (without regard to the limitation
on the amount of compensation that may be taken into account for the
purposes of the 2002 Restatement as imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the
Code and as if Earnings includes amounts voluntarily deferred by the
Participant pursuant to a Lafarge nonqualified deferred compensation plan or
a written agreement between the Participant and Lafarge), converted from the
normal form of benefit payable under the 1989 Restatement to an actuarially
equivalent (as defined in the 1989 Restatement) single life annuity, exceeds
   Source of Benefits
 -7-




---



##### 



Spendthrift Provision
 Employment Noncontractual
 Adoption by Other Employers
 Amendment and Termination
 -8-




---



##### 



Claims Procedure
 Applicable Law
 -9-




---



##### 



Special Benefit Adjustments
   -10-




---



##### 



Offset for Other Nonqualified Plan Benefits
 Merger of Redland Supplemental Retirement Income Plans
  -11-




---



##### 



-12-




---



##### 



st
 LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC.By
    /s/ James NealisJames Nealis, Senior Vice President Human Resources -13-




---



##### 



-14-