alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2199

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal

law enforcement agency to enter into a cooperative agreement with the Metropolitan Police Department of the

District of Columbia to assist the Department in carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement activities

in the District of Columbia if deemed appropriate by

the Chief of the Department and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.
2

HR 2199 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

5 Police Coordination Amendment Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADDITIONAL FEDERAL LAW ENFORCE7 MENT AGENCIES TO ENTER INTO COOPERA8 TIVE AGREEMENTS WITH METROPOLITAN

9 POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF

10 COLUMBIA.

11 Section 11712(d) of the National Capital Revitaliza12 tion and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 (D.C.

13 Code, sec. 4–192(d)) is amended by adding at the end the

14 following:

15 ‘‘(33) Any other law enforcement agency of the

16 Federal government that the Chief of the Metropoli17 tan Police Department and the United States Attor18 ney for the District of Columbia deem appropriate to

19 enter into an agreement pursuant to this section.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 25,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Walter S.
Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to
his/her knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/  WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
-----------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
July 2, 2007


/s/  MOMOKO A. BERAN
-----------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
July 2, 2007

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Wachovia Securities, LLC

v. Civil No. 08-cv-251-JL

Richard T. Iannacone, et al.

ORDER OF RECUSAL

Because James A. MacDonald is a personal acquaintance of

mine and our sons played youth baseball together during the

summers of 2006 and 2007, I hereby recuse myself from presiding

over this case, and request that the clerk reassign this matter. 

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 24, 2008

cc: Jeanne P. Herrick, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00251-MML Document 7 Filed 06/24/08 Page 1 of 1
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2006   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2007   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2008   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 2  | .     |
| 2009   | 2  | 3  | .  | .  | .     |
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Denise Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011





/s/ Denise HawkinsDenise HawkinsChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

______________________________________________________________________________

Peerless Insurance Company a/s/o Bethany Commons, LLC;

et al.

Plaintiffs

- v. - Docket No. 1:08-cv-81-PB

NuTone, Inc.,

Defendant

and

USI-Ultra Services, Inc.,

Consolidated Cross-Defendant

______________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties to the

above-entitled action hereby stipulate that said action be dismissed with prejudice only against

USI-Ultra Services, Inc. in Docket no. 1:09-cv-121, and the primary action against NuTone,

Docket No. 1:08-cv-81-PB, still remain.

The parties shall pay their own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with this dismissal.

Case 1:08-cv-00081-PB Document 49 Filed 12/15/10 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4

Respectfully submitted,

Peerless Insurance Company a/s/o Bethany

Commons, LLC; et al.

By their Attorneys,

Dated: December 9, 2010 By: ___/s/ Andrew D. Dunn

Andrew D. Dunn, Esquire (NH Bar #696)

Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A.

111 Amherst Street

Manchester, NH 03105-0719

(603) 669-1000

ADunn@DevineMillimet.com

Mary Ann Dempsey, Esquire

Wiggin & Nourie, P.A.

670 N Commercial St, Ste 305

PO Box 808

Manchester, NH 03105-0808

(603) 669-2211

mdempsey@wiggin-nourie.com

and

Virginia M. Markovich, Esquire

CLAUSEN MILLER, P.C.

One Chase Manhattan Plaza

39th Floor

New York, New York 10005

(212) 805-3900

vmarkovich@clausen.com

NuTone, Inc.

By its Attorneys,

Dated: December 13, 2010 By: __/s/ Christopher A. Duggan______________

Christopher A. Duggan, Esquire

(MA Bar #544150)

Smith & Duggan, LLP

55 Old Bedford Road

Lincoln, MA 01773-1125

(617) 228-4400

chris.duggan@smithduggan.com

Case 1:08-cv-00081-PB Document 49 Filed 12/15/10 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 of 4

and

Karyn Forbes, Esquire

(NH Bar No. 834)

Shaheen & Gordon, P.A.

107 Storrs Street

P.O. Box 2703

Concord, NH 03302-2703

(603) 225-7262

kforbes@shaheengordon.com

USI-Ultra Services, Inc.

By its Attorneys,

Dated: December 9, 2010 By: __/s/ Frank W. Beckstein, III________

Frank W. Beckstein, III, Esquire

(NH Bar No. 15458)

99 Middle Street

Manchester, NH 03101

(603) 647-1800

fbeckstein@nkms.com

SO ORDERED, this ___ day of ________________, 2010

_______________________________________

Judge

United States District Court

Case 1:08-cv-00081-PB Document 49 Filed 12/15/10 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing will be sent to counsel of record this day via the

Court’s Electronic Case Filing system.

Dated: December 13, 2010 By: ___/s/ Andrew D. Dunn

Andrew D. Dunn, Esquire (NH Bar #696)

ADunn@DevineMillimet.com

C:\USERS\REMARIANO\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\WDGX\4300\OPEN\0002\STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL - USI (M1734386).DOC

Case 1:08-cv-00081-PB Document 49 Filed 12/15/10 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM

THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND ASAY,

SAMUEL VIDAL GOMEZ,

JERRY LEE RHEA,

DENNIS GLENN COEN,

LOUIE GEORGE SCHIMPF, and

QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before Court on the Motion for Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal

Without Prejudice of Complaint Against Defendant Louis George Schimpf [Docket No.

68]. Plaintiff has agreed to the dismissal of its claims against defendant Schimpf

without prejudice. In exchange, Schimpf has agreed to (1) voluntarily appear at

depositions, hearings, and trials in this case; (2) accept service by mail or electronic

transmission of notices or subpoenas issued by Plaintiff for testimony at depositions,

hearings, or trials; (3) waive the territorial limits on service contained in Rule 45 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable local rules with respect to such

notices and subpoenas, provided plaintiff reimburses defendant Schimpf for travel and

lodging at a reasonable rate; and (4) consent to personal jurisdiction in any United

States District Court for purposes of enforcing any such subpoena. Wherefore, it is

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 69 Filed 05/08/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Louie George Schimpf are

dismissed without prejudice.

DATED May 8, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Philip A. Brimmer 

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM Document 69 Filed 05/08/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1991...... 9.8 10.2 11.0 10.4 11.3 8.6 11.5 11.2 10.7 9.2 

1992...... 7.8 8.2 8.6 8.8 9.3 6.3 9.7 9.3 8.8 7.1 

1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 

1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 

1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 

1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 

1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 

2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 

2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 

2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2000: Q1... 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.5 8.0 9.2 9.8 9.7 9.5 9.0 

 Q2... 9.7 9.6 9.9 9.9 10.1 9.2 10.3 10.1 10.0 9.4 

 Q3... 10.2 10.4 10.2 10.3 10.1 9.6 10.7 10.7 10.4 9.8 

 Q4... 10.0 10.0 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.4 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.7 

2001: Q1... 9.1 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.2 8.3 10.1 9.8 9.6 8.7 

 Q2... 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.1 7.8 9.2 8.9 8.6 7.9 

 Q3... 7.7 7.8 7.5 8.1 8.2 6.9 8.9 8.5 8.0 7.1 

 Q4... 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.8 7.4 5.3 7.9 7.4 6.8 5.5 

2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7 

 Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6 

 Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9 

 Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 

2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2 

 Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4 

 Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6 

 Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### Smithy E. Dunbar, Appellant, v Lorraine E. Dunbar, Respondent.

[806 NYS2d 434]

In a matrimonial action in which the *532parties were divorced by judgment entered February 29, 1988, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), dated February 24, 2004, as amended March 1, 2004, which denied his motion, inter alia, for an order permitting the removal of certain funds maintained in the custody of the Suffolk County Treasurer as security for payment of the plaintiffs future maintenance obligations.

Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The arguments the plaintiff advances in this matter either were or could have been made in a previous round of motion practice, which led to a prior appeal by the plaintiff *(see Dunbar v Dunbar,*309 AD2d 780 [2003]). In that appeal, this Court determined that the Supreme Court properly directed the plaintiff to give reasonable security to guarantee the payment of future maintenance, although we reduced the amount of that security.

In any event, we agree with the Supreme Court that, to the extent the plaintiffs current contentions have not previously been raised, they are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                                  CALTON, INC.
                          SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATE LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  Company                                             State of Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                                           <C>
Active Wholly-owned Subsidiaries:
---------------------------------
     eCalton.com, Inc. (f/k/a Calton Homes of Florida, Inc.)                  Florida
     PrivilegeONE Networks, LLC (as of May 10, 2001)                          Delaware
     Homes by Calton, LLC (as of July 10, 2003)                               Florida


Inactive Subsidiaries:
----------------------
     Calton Acquisition Corp.                                                 Delaware
     Calton Homes of California, Inc.                                         California
     Talcon Title Agency, L.P. (Partnership)                                  New Jersey


Inactive Subsidiaries Presently Being Dissolved:
------------------------------------------------
     Calton Manzanita Corporation (conditional dissolution 12/4/02)           California
     Calton Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                       Pennsylvania
     Calton Homes of Pennsylvania at Pennway, Inc.                            Pennsylvania


Dissolved
---------

     See Attached
</TABLE>





Jan. 12, 2004


<PAGE>

                                  CALTON, INC.


     LIST OF DISSOLVED COMPANIES

                                                             Date of
Company                                 Incorporation        Dissolution
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Calton General, Inc.                     New Jersey          March 11, 2003
Calton Homes Finance II, Inc.            New Jersey          March 11, 2003
      (finance company)
Calton Lindenwood Corporation            California          March 27, 2003

Calton Manzanita Corporation             California          Dec. 4, 2002  *
Calton California Equity Corporation     California          April 23, 2002
Calton Tamarack Corporation              California          March 21, 2002

Calton Capital, Inc.                     New Jersey          Sept. 10, 2001
Calton Homes Finance, Inc.               New Jersey          Sept. 10, 2001
Haddon Group of Virginia, Inc.           New Jersey          Sept. 10, 2001

Calton Homes of Chicago                  Illinois            March 28, 2000

Calton Capital II, Inc.                                      Jan. 12, 1998
Calton Funding, Inc.                                         Jan. 12, 1998
Calcap Commercial Management, Inc.                           Jan. 12, 1998
Talcon Assignment, Inc.                                      Jan. 12, 1998



Other:
------

Calton Homes, Inc.                       New Jersey          Sold to Centex
                                                               12/31/98






Jan. 12, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending October 22, 2005FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFirst Wyoming Financial Corporation                                                                                     * 3A1First Wyoming Financial Corporation, Wyoming, DE, to form a bank holding company by acquiring First National Bank of Wyoming, Wyoming, DE.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableFULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                            * 3A5Fulton Financial Corporation, Lancaster, PA, to acquire 100% of the outstanding shares of Columbia Bancorp, Columbia, MD, and thereby indirectly acquire The Columbia Bank, Columbia, MD.Newspaper: 11/20/2005Federal Register: Not available
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Keith MacConnell,

Myquon Media, LLC,

Sonic Automotive, LLC, and

Heather McGough

v. Civil No. 07-cv-369-JM

City of Nashua,

Nashua Police Department,

Jeffrey Mahar, Kerry Baxter, and

Dennis Linehan

O R D E R

The parties have finished briefing the summary judgment

motion but I have not had the time to resolve the motion nor will

I have the time before the currently scheduled trial date. The

trial is continued. The Clerk is directed to reschedule the

trial on a date after July acceptable to the parties.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 16, 2009

cc: Richard J. Lehmann, Esq.

 Brian J.S. Cullen, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00369-JM Document 21 Filed 04/17/09 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2129

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to promote better nutrition

among school children participating in the school breakfast and lunch

programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. HINCHEY (for himself, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. DINGELL, Mr.

MCGOVERN, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. BALDACCI, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. NORTON, Ms. DELAURO, Mr.

BONIOR, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. LEE, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. UDALL

of New Mexico, and Ms. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to promote better

nutrition among school children participating in the

school breakfast and lunch programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Nutrition for

5 School Children Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2129 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO SERVICE OF COMPETI2 TIVE FOODS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10 of the Child Nutrition

4 Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1779) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘(throughout

6 the entire school, including the school grounds, until

7 the end of the school day)’’ after ‘‘participating

8 schools’’;

9 (2) by striking subsection (b); and

10 (3) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub11 section (b).

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days

14 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec15 retary of Agriculture shall promulgate such regula16 tions as are necessary to implement the amendments

17 made by subsection (a).

18 (2) PROCEDURE.—The promulgation of the reg19 ulations and the administration of the amendments

20 made by this section shall be made without regard

21 to chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code (com22 monly known as the ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’).

23 (3) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULE24 MAKING.—In carrying out this subsection, the Sec-
3

•HR 2129 IH

1 retary shall use the authority provided under section

2 808(2) of title 5, United States Code.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Libertarian Party of

New Hampshire

v. Civil No. 08-cv-367-JM

William Gardner, in his

official capacity as

New Hampshire Secretary of State

O R D E R

This matter is set for trial to begin February 11, 2010,

with pretrial statements due January 11, 2010. Currently pending

before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. See

document nos. 12 and 19. As both parties agree there are no

disputed issues of material fact, the more prudent course to

follow appears to be to suspend the trial and all trial-related

deadlines until the summary judgment motions have been decided. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 4, 2010 

cc: Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

 Evan Feit Nappen, Esq.

 Gary Sinawski, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00367-JM Document 26 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 1