alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 851 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 17, 2007. 

Whereas on December 2 and 3, 2007, a storm with winds exceeding 120 miles per hour struck Oregon and Washington, toppled trees, felled power lines, and destroyed 

homes and businesses; 

Whereas more than ten inches of rain fell in 24 hours, inundating parts of Oregon and Washington, causing rivers to 

overflow, flooding homes, schools, businesses, and roads; 

Whereas the combination of hurricane-force winds and torrential rains caused devastating damage that isolated 

towns, left citizens without housing, transportation, communications, water, heat, or electricity; 

Whereas local and State emergency personnel responded heroically and without hesitation to aid in rescue, recovery, 

and assistance efforts; 

Whereas the Oregon and Washington National Guard and 

the U.S. Coast Guard rescued hundreds of individuals 

trapped in or on their homes by rising water; 

Whereas the people of Oregon and Washington rose to become extraordinary citizens by helping each other, opening their homes, schools, churches, and businesses to 

shelter their neighbors; 
2 

•HRES 851 EH 

Whereas amateur radio operators performed vital communication duties in assisting first responders; 

Whereas the National Weather Service forecasts helped avert 

even greater casualties and damage; 

Whereas people have perished in the storm; 

Whereas homes, businesses, schools, and roads have been 

closed; 

Whereas many long-term effects of the storm are still unknown; and 

Whereas thousands of people of the Pacific Northwest are 

without power, water, or road access: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the citizens of the Pacific Northwest for 

their courage in facing the storm and efforts in helping 

their neighbors in a time of great need; 

(2) honors the National Weather Service, State and 

local police officers, fire fighters, local rescue personnel, 

other first responders, and amateur radio operators for 

their efforts in the face of the severe storm; 

(3) extends its thoughts and prayers to those whose 

lives have been devastated, and who have lost their housing, transportation, communications, water, heat, or 

electricity; and 
3 

•HRES 851 EH 

(4) extends its profound and deepest sympathies to 

the families and friends of those who perished. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-27-01-JL

Douglas M. Johnson

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

10) filed by defendant is granted in part. The continuance is

limited to 60 days.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Date: March 20, 2009

cc: John T. Pendleton, Esq.

Debra M. Walsh, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00027-JL Document 11 Filed 03/20/09 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:05-cv-00075-PB Document 5 Filed 07/08/05 Page 1 of 1
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

1997: Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
#### Marino *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 24671

— Decided March 28, 1934.)

*Mr. Ban Gennett*and *Mr. Bominic F. Rendinell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. George N. Graham,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. A. C. L. Barthelmeh,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no *110debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Allen, J., not participating.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-60380 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. BOBBY C. DOZIER, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:10-CR-107-1

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bobby C. Dozier pleaded guilty t o p ossession of a computer hard drive containing images of child pornography, and the district court sentenced him to

a below-guidelines 30-months in prison to be followed by five years of supervised release. On direct appeal, Dozier asserts, for the first ti m e , t h a t h i s trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to comply with the court-imposed deadlines for preparing his expert witne s s for trial and, thus, failed to present a defense. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D May9, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-60380 Document: 00511849587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/09/2012No. 11-60380

“[T]he general rule in this circuit is that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be r e s o l v e d o n direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record

on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Gulley , 526 F.3d 809, 821 (5th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The alleged ineffectiveness of Dozier’s counsel cannot be resolved from the evidence contained in the record and, if warranted, would requir e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f m a t ters outside the record. Se e U n i t e d States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992). Ac c o r di n gly , w e d e c l i n e t o a ddress Dozier’s ineffective a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l claims, but without prejudice to his right to raise them in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-60380 Document: 00511849587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/09/2012
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Text Data Files The files containing data from 1986 to present are updated each month as part of the G.17 release process.
The historical data, grouped by the table in which they appear in the G.17 release, are available in text files. 
The format for each line in the files consists of an industry code, 
a year, and 12 months of data (to four decimal places) when available.  The data have 
various start dates; the earliest is 1919. Data files for: Tables 1, 2 and 10 Table 3 Table 6 Tables 7 and 8 Table 9 All Tables Discontinued Data
 Current and Historical Data: Relative Importance Weights  Data:  Relative Importance Weights for Seasonally Adjusted IP (to August 2016)  Documentation:  Table 1: Industrial Production: Market and Industry Group SummaryTable 2: Industrial Production: Special Aggregates and Selected Detail The relative importance weights provided in the data file allow the user to compute special aggregates of industrial production that are not published in the 
G.17 release. These weights should be used to combine growth rates of component IP series to obtain a growth rate for a special aggregate. If industry C is industries A and B combined, the growth of IP for C can be approximately computed using the following formula, where IP_A[t] is the level of 
IP for industry A in month t and RIW_A[t-1] is the relative importance weight of industry A in month t-1. IP_C[t]/IP_C[t-1] = (RIW_A[t-1]*IP_A[t]/IP_A[t-1] + RIW_B[t-1]*IP_B[t]/IP_B[t-1])/(RIW_A[t-1] + RIW_B[t-1]) To exclude industry B from IP aggregate A, one would subtract instead of adding: IP_C[t]/IP_C[t-1] = (RIW_A[t-1]*IP_A[t]/IP_A[t-1] - RIW_B[t-1]*IP_B[t]/IP_B[t-1])/(RIW_A[t-1] - RIW_B[t-1]) Data files for: Tables 1, 2 and 10 Table 3 Table 6 Tables 7 and 8 Table 9 All Tables Discontinued Data
   Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,734,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  900,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (343,698)
<INVENTORY>                                    261,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,599,838
<PP&E>                                         753,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                (328,128)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,059,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          348,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,355
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,706,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,059,465
<SALES>                                        523,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               523,458
<CGS>                                          318,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  318,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,302,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (57,889)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,039,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,039,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,039,919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.18)


</TABLE>
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1994...... .5 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

1996: Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 3.0 1.1 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.6 .9 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22712]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6376]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Worshiping Women: Ritual and Reality in Classical 
Athens''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Worshiping Women: Ritual and Reality in 
Classical Athens,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Onassis Cultural Center, New York, NY, from on 
or about December 10, 2008, until on or about May 9, 2009, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered 
to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: September 15, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-22712 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
                               Estimated volume              Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                            (millions of dollars)                             (percent)
                      __________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2     Q3     Q4     Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                        
1998......    |           6      -1      3      0      5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3      5      7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3      8     14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9      5     17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6      5     16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6      8     14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1      5      2     10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2     11      4      0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2      6      1     12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
2007......    |           8      -3      0      5      6      .015     -.006      .000     .009     .011
2008......    |          54       5      8     12     29      .093      .008      .013     .020     .046
2009......    |         184      33     41     34     77      .289      .051      .064     .051     .116
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc. for the periods covered by this periodic report.

|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Michael C. Pearce                
|                      |  | Michael C. Pearce                    
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                      |  |                                      
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                
|                      |  | Tracy S. Clifford                    
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                           2,493
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,444
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                520
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             59,659
<PP&E>                                           1,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,162
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<PAYABLES>                                      92,874
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                 510
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,162
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                1,256
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             2,408
<COMMISSIONS>                                   12,838
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,138
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,711
<COMPENSATION>                                  12,624
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (241)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (241)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>