alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 9, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01555-CV

CELERINA RAMIREZ AND RUBEN DELUIS, Appellants

V.

MARIO SCCAFFETTI AND RUBY LEE SCCAFFETTI, Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14315

ORDER

As directed to do so, appellants have provided written verification they have 

paid for the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER Tenesa Shaw, Official 

Court Reporter for the 192nd Judicial District Court, to file the record no later than 

May 11, 2020.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Shaw and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
| Period | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total |
|--------|----|----|----|----|-------|
| 1981   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 1982   | 2  | 3  | 3  | 3  | 11    |
| 1983   | 1  | 1  | 2  | 3  | 7     |
| 1984   | 3  | 7  | 10 | 12 | 32    |
| 1985   | 12 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 68    |
| 1986   | 14 | 14 | 21 | 16 | 65    |
| 1987   | 22 | 19 | 12 | 16 | 69    |
| 1988   | 11 | 6  | 12 | 7  | 36    |
| 1989   | 5  | 7  | 5  | 5  | 22    |
| 1990   | 3  | 5  | 6  | 3  | 17    |
| 1991   | 2  | 2  | 3  | 1  | 8     |
| 1992   | 1  | 1  | 1  | 4  | 7     |
| 1993   | 1  | 2  | 2  | 0  | 5     |
| 1994   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1995   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 1996   | 0  | 2  | 0  | 0  | 2     |
| 1997   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 1     |
| 1998   | 0  | 0  | 1  | 0  | 1     |
| 1999   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2000   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2001   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2002   | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1  | 2     |
| 2003   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2004   | 0  | 1  | 0  | 0  | 1     |
| 2005   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0     |
| 2006   | 0  | 0  | 0  | 0  | .     |
| 2007   | 0  | 0  | 0  | .  | .     |
EXHIBIT 3.6

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                      OLYMPIC CASCADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION


     Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation, a corporation organized under
and existing by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     1. The certificate of incorporation of said corporation is hereby amended
by striking out the FIRST paragraph thereof and by substituting in lieu of said
paragraph the following paragraph:

     "FIRST: The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation")
     is National Holdings Corporation."

     2. The foregoing amendment was effected pursuant to a resolution of the
Board of Directors of said corporation.

     3. The foregoing amendment was approved by a majority vote of stockholders
of said corporation at a duly called and held meeting of stockholders on March
15, 2006.


Dated:  March 15, 2006



                                       /s/ Mark Goldwasser
                                       --------------------------
                                       Mark Goldwasser
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Peter David CHANT, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-71981.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 2003.*

Decided Aug. 1, 2003.

*732Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Peter Chant petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) removal order.1 We dismiss Chant’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.

This court does not have jurisdiction “to review any final order of removal against an alien who is removable by reason of having committed a criminal offense covered in ... [8 U.S.C. § ]1227(a)(2)(A)(iii),(B),(C), or (D).” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). Constitutional challenges to the removal of aliens who have been convicted of one of the enumerated offenses must be raised in district court through habeas petitions. *Cedano-Viera v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1062, 1064 (9th Cir.2003). We retain jurisdiction, however, “to determine whether a petitioner ‘is an alien [removable] by reason of having been convicted of one of the enumerated offenses.’ ” *Flores-Miramontes v. INS,*212 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir.2000) (quoting *Magana-Pizano v. INS,*200 F.3d 603, 607 (9th Cir.1999)).

Chant claims that he is not an alien because he has obtained nationality through, *inter alia,*his extended stay in the United States, his application for naturalization, his oath of loyalty, and his many recitations of the Pledge of the Allegiance and Boy Scout Oath. This claim of nationality is foreclosed by *Perdomo-Padilla v. Ashcroft,*333 F.3d 964, 965 (9th Cir.2003), which held that “a person may become a ‘national of the United States’ only through birth or naturalization.” Because Chant was neither naturalized nor born in a territory of the United States he is not a national of the United States.

Chant also contends that the Child Citizenship Act (“CCA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1431(a), applies retroactively to grant him citizenship based on his father’s naturalization. This exact argument was rejected in *Hughes v. Ashcroft,*255 F.3d 752, 760 (9th Cir.2001). The CCA does not apply to Chant.

Because Chant is neither a national nor a citizen of the United States, he is “an alien who is removable by reason of having committed” one of the enumerated crimes. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). We therefore do not have jurisdiction over Chant’s remaining challenges to his removal. *See FloresMiramontes,*212 F.3d at 1143.

PETITION DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1877

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that

certain sexual crimes against children are predicate

crimes for the interception of communications, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1877 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Sex Crimes

3 Wiretapping Act of 2002’’.

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF INTERCEPTION OF COMMU5 NICATIONS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SEX6 UAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2516(1)(c) of title 18,

8 United States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘2251 and 2252’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2252A’’; and

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘section 2423(b) (relating to

12 travel with intent to engage in a sexual act with a

13 juvenile),’’ after ‘‘motor vehicle parts),’’.

14 (b) TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIV15 ITY.—Section 2516(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

16 amended—

17 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

18 (q);

19 (2) by inserting after paragraph (q) the fol20 lowing:

21 ‘‘(r) a violation of section 2422 (relating to co22 ercion and enticement) and section 2423(a) (relating

23 to transportation of minors) of this title, if, in con24 nection with that violation, the intended sexual activ25 ity would constitute a felony violation of chapter

26 109A or 110, including a felony violation of chapter
3

HR 1877 RFS

1 109A or 110 if the sexual activity occurred, or was

2 intended to occur, within the special maritime and

3 territorial jurisdiction of the United States, regard4 less of where it actually occurred or was intended to

5 occur; or’’; and

6 (3) by redesignating paragraph (r) as para7 graph (s).

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of Julie A. Hughes et al., Appellants, v State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. M-68920.)

[807 NYS2d 572]

In a proceeding pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for leave to file a late claim, the claimants appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Lack, J.), entered December 21, 2004, which denied their application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the application is granted, and the proposed claim is deemed filed.

Contrary to the contention of the respondent and the determination of the Court of Claims, consideration of the statutory factors set forth in Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) strongly favors the granting of the claimants’ application for leave to file a late claim in this case. While the claimants did not provide an acceptable excuse for their failure to timely file their detailed notice of intention to file a claim under Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) *(see Matter of Sandlin v State of New York,*294 AD2d 723, 724 [2002]; *Matter of E.K. v State of New York,*235 AD2d 540, 541 [1997]), the delay was minimal and the respondent was not prejudiced thereby *(see Jomarron v State of New York,*23 AD3d 527 [2005]; *Matter of Morales v State of New York,*292 AD2d 455, 456 [2002]; *Marcus v State of New York,*172 AD2d 724 [1991]; *DeFilippis v State of New York,*157 AD2d 826, 828 [1990], *amended*159 AD2d 604 [1990]). Furthermore, the physician’s affidavit submitted by the claimants was sufficiently specific and detailed to establish the appearance of merit of the claim within the meaning of Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) *(see generally Holly v State of New York,*191 AD2d 678 [1993]).

The respondent’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive under the circumstances presented. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 455,112 12,948 30,321 38,935 64,508 93,20Number of loans 7,702 2,447 2,073 1,158 937 62Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.64 13.36 18.42 14.25 28.06 27.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 13.25 7.30 8.69 10.74 16.25 15.0

Weighted average risk rating3 2.38 2.62 2.39 2.45 2.40 2.3

Weighted average interest rate4 6.40 7.32 7.00 6.41 6.83 5.8

 Standard error5 .22 .22 .24 .11 .30 .1

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.25 8.07 8.11 7.21 7.76 6.5 25th percentile 5.39 6.39 6.17 6.00 6.02 5.2 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.53 6.75 6.22 6.08 6.06 6.3 Other livestock 7.50 8.40 7.24 7.00 7.77 n. Other current operating expenses7 6.42 7.02 7.08 6.33 6.70 5.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.89 7.77 6.80 6.72 6.38 5.7 Farm real estate 6.17 6.57 6.87 6.00 7.54 6.0 Other8 5.10 7.85 7.79 6.36 7.27 5.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 44.73 48.68 48.66 33.93 33.56 36.8 Under commitment 45.84 56.43 47.48 49.53 44.37 34.7 Callable 19.70 18.57 21.83 19.97 25.51 14.4 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 11.02 5.83 6.29 8.44 12.47 10.8 Other livestock 3.38 13.03 9.81 12.35 9.19 n. Other current operating expenses7 59.87 60.68 66.50 67.30 43.72 66.8

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.22 14.86 13.87 6.90 13.72 9.3 Farm real estate 8.82 1.59 3.03 2.50 13.70 7.3 Other8 8.69 4.01 .49 2.50 7.19 5.6

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.79 7.17 5.89 8.76 23.63 13.4 Other 84.22 82.64 89.21 88.79 75.22 86.5 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended, the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant Alexium Ltd., a business entity of Cyprus, having a place of business at 2 Sophouli Street, 8th Floor Chanteclair House, 1096-Nicosia, Cyprus, an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air Force has in:  U.S. Patent Application No. 11/527,662 filed September 15, 2006, entitled “Method for Attachment of Silicon-Containing Compounds to a Surface and for Synthesis of Hypervalent Silicon-Compounds” by Jeffrey R. Owens, as well as other related know how. A license for this patent and related know how will be granted unless a written objection is filed within fifteen (15) days from the date of publication of this Notice. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Jeffrey R. Moore, Attorney, Air Force Materiel Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, Building 11, Suite 100, 2240 B Street, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7109. Telephone: (937) 904-5088; Facsimile (937) 255-3733. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-2287 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1984
          3
          7
          10
          12
          321985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12005
          0
          0
          0
          0
          0 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 22, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRCATED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         570,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,017,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,342,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,252,125
<PP&E>                                       1,425,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                 786,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,346,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,884,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        389
<COMMON>                                         3,198
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,626,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,346,624
<SALES>                                      2,961,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,961,405
<CGS>                                        2,025,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,025,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               959,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (307,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            228,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   228,147
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40033

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MARIO BALLESTEROS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-95-CR-102-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 18, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Mario Ballesteros appeals his guilty-plea conviction

and sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana,

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the district

court erred in refusing to order that his sentence run

concurrently to an undischarged term of imprisonment under

U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b).

The district court did not err in refusing to order that

Ballesteros’ sentence run concurrently to his undischarged term 
No. 96-40033

- 2 -

of imprisonment. See United States v. Wittie, 25 F.3d 250, 260

(5th Cir. 1994), aff’d, 115 S. Ct. 2199 (1995). 

AFFIRMED.
33

C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next Quarter, Compared with a Year EarlierPercent

Purpose of loan

Total Feeder cattle Dairy Crop storage Operating 

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same Hig

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2005: Q1... 9 61 30 16 72 12 11 80 9 12 78 9 9 52 

 Q2... 14 62 24 21 70 9 12 82 7 18 68 15 9 58  Q3... 10 57 33 16 73 11 7 89 5 14 63 23 9 42  Q4... 10 51 39 17 65 17 12 83 5 17 67 16 7 39 2006: Q1... 8 55 37 21 72 7 12 81 7 17 63 19 7 39  Q2... 16 55 29 15 78 7 13 80 7 15 60 25 10 49  Q3... 12 58 30 17 71 11 15 77 9 11 60 28 8 45  Q4... 18 47 35 27 66 7 15 78 7 9 53 38 17 40 2007: Q1... 10 51 38 23 68 8 13 79 8 5 51 45 9 42 

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2005: Q1... 12 69 19 19 66 15 16 80 4 11 84 5 11 68 

 Q2... 15 69 15 15 74 12 13 80 2 8 82 5 10 72  Q3... 12 67 21 17 68 15 12 81 1 7 83 5 8 70  Q4... 12 73 15 17 64 19 12 79 4 13 76 6 12 69 2006: Q1... 23 58 19 25 67 8 12 83 5 14 83 3 21 62  Q2... 25 61 14 35 61 4 11 82 2 13 77 5 20 58  Q3... 23 63 14 21 67 12 11 80 4 11 85 5 13 59  Q4... 14 66 20 26 63 11 10 80 5 10 85 6 11 66 2007: Q1... 13 64 24 18 72 10 12 77 5 12 81 7 7 65 

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*)

2005: Q1... 18 73 9 19 71 10 14 81 5 4 96 0 16 68 

 Q2... 11 67 22 7 87 7 27 73 0 19 81 0 11 67  Q3... 24 71 5 6 89 6 13 88 0 11 11 0 5 19  Q4... 28 61 11 14 71 14 20 80 0 13 75 13 26 58 2006: Q1... 21 63 16 19 69 13 19 81 0 22 72 6 23 68  Q2... 16 74 11 0 87 13 21 79 0 13 81 6 21 68  Q3... 47 53 0 29 64 7 31 69 0 31 69 0 42 58  Q4... 25 70 5 18 76 6 24 76 0 16 68 16 25 70 2007: Q1... 26 58 16 20 67 13 21 64 14 44 50 6 21 58  * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
Skip to Content
Release dates
About
Current release
*Other formats:*
 ASCII (48 KB)
PDF (160 KB)
CSV (184 KB)

----

**March 2008**

Section A
Section B

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable (CSV) format contain all available historical data.Section CReserve Bank Surveys of Farm Credit Conditions and Farm Land Values   C.1. Non-real-estate Farm Lending Compared with a Year EarlierASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (17 KB)  C.2. Expected Farm Loan Volume for the Next QuarterASCII (11 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.3. Indicators of Relative Credit AvailabilityASCII (12 KB)PDF (6 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (14 KB)  C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (10 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (6 KB)  C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm LoansASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (1 KB)  C.6. Trends in Farm Real Estate Values and Loan VolumeASCII (7 KB)PDF (4 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (12 KB)  C.7. Trends in Farm Income and ExpendituresASCII (4 KB)PDF (3 KB)Screen ReaderCSV (7 KB)Release dates |AboutCurrent release*Other formats:* ASCII (48 KB) |PDF (160 KB) |CSV (184 KB)
Statistical releases
Home |Economic research and dataAccessibility |Contact Us**Last update: March 26, 2008**