alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 75.1 82.9 74.3 72.3 51.6 75.7 58.6 59.8 70.4 80.2 1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2002: Q4... 81.4 78.1 65.4 81.8 37.9 93.5 67.6 62.8 68.0 92.2 2003: Q1... 74.7 64.0 79.5 75.4 61.7 86.0 68.2 67.5 63.7 80.8  Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Q2... 75.9 68.7 69.8 66.0 85.6 90.8 68.8 64.4 70.3 79.4  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
EXHIBT 32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of
AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV LP (the
“Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date:
November 12, 2009




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
*Release Date: March 31, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

----

```
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 95   | 16                                     | 27                                                   | 24 | 30 | .240 | .039 | .070 | .058 | .071 |
| 93   | 6                                      | 19                                                   | 19 | 50 | .230 | .014 | .049 | .045 | .112 |
| 87   | 4                                      | 15                                                   | 24 | 45 | .198 | .008 | .036 | .051 | .095 |
| 126  | 18                                     | 37                                                   | 35 | 36 | .280 | .040 | .086 | .078 | .080 |
| 108  | 11                                     | 17                                                   | 34 | 45 | .259 | .027 | .041 | .075 | .098 |
| 308  | 67                                     | 53                                                   | 140 | 48 | .656 | .142 | .118 | .294 | .101 |
| 221  | 40                                     | 50                                                   | 58 | 73 | .471 | .085 | .114 | .124 | .157 |
| 175  | 34                                     | 35                                                   | 48 | 58 | .382 | .074 | .080 | .108 | .128 |
| 129  | 28                                     | 17                                                   | 46 | 38 | .284 | .062 | .039 | .099 | .081 |
| 59   | 8                                      | 16                                                   | 12 | 24 | .124 | .017 | .035 | .026 | .048 |
| 73   | 9                                      | 7                                                    | 23 | 34 | .146 | .018 | .015 | .045 | .064 |
| 90   | 8                                      | 13                                                   | 23 | 47 | .170 | .014 | .025 | .042 | .085 |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 05-cr-22-01-SM

Marie Colokathis

O R D E R

Defendant Colokathis’ motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document no. 19). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 

2006 trial period. Defendant Colokathis shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights

not later than September 28, 2005. On the filing of such waiver, her

continuance shall be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: December 16, 2005 at 3:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 4, 2006 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:05-cr-00022-SM Document 20 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

September 19, 2005

cc: Brian Tucker, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:05-cr-00022-SM Document 20 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11448]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Arkansas (FEMA-1793-DR), dated 09/18/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms and flooding associated with Hurricane Gustav. *Incident Period:*
                         09/02/2008 through 09/08/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         09/18/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/17/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/18/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/18/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Ashley, Bradley, Calhoun, Chicot, Clark, Cleveland, Conway, Dallas, Drew, Garland, Grant, Hot Spring, Lincoln, Montgomery, Perry, Prairie, Saline, Van Buren. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Arkansas:  Arkansas, Cleburne, Desha, Faulkner, Howard, Jefferson, Nevada, Ouachita, Pike, Polk, Pope, Pulaski, Scott, Searcy, Stone, Union, Yell. Louisiana: East Carroll, Morehouse, Union, West Carroll. Mississippi: Bolivar, Issaquena, Washington. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and economic injury is 11448. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-22902 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 11

Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Unit

For the Periods



|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | --------- | - | ------------------------------------ | - | --------- | -
|                                             |  | January 1, 2009throughMarch 31, 2009 |           |   | January 1, 2008throughMarch 31, 2008 |  
|                                             |  | (unaudited)                          |           |   | (unaudited)                          |  
|Net income (Loss)                            |  | $                                    | (18,763   | ) |                                      | $ | (8,715    | )
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|                                             |  |                                     
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                      | 4,222,870 |   |                                      |   | 4,222,870 |  
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |  
|                                             |  |                                     
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                    | (0.00     | ) |                                      | $ | (0.01     | )
|                                             |  |                                      |           |   |                                      |   |           |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Jayson Fulcher

Criminal No . 09-cr-26-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

14) filed by defendant is granted in part . The continuance is

limited to 60 days .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : May 6, 200 9

cc : Paul Garrity, Esq .

Terry Ollila, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00026-JD Document 15 Filed 05/06/09 Page 1 of 1
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 10 Gross-Value-Weighted Industrial Production: Stage-of-Process Groups  Item
2012gross value[1]
Fourth quarter tofourth quarter
Annual rate
Monthly rate
Aug. '12toAug. '132012Q4
2013
20132010
2011
2012
Q1[r]
Q2[r]
Mar.[r]
Apr.[r]
May[r]
June[r]
July[r]
Aug.[p]Finished
1,992.6
4.1
4.7
4.4
2.0
5.6
1.8
.2
-.4
.1
.8
-1.1
1.3
3.5Semifinished
1,706.9
9.2
2.9
3.2
1.4
6.6
-1.0
.6
-.5
-.5
.0
-.8
.5
1.9Primary
1,328.1
3.9
1.4
.0
1.9
4.3
-1.4
.6
-.9
.5
-.7
1.2
-.7
1.0Crude
670.3
6.5
3.0
1.8
7.6
-1.9
3.3
-.1
.0
1.3
-.2
1.1
.4
4.5    Return to table    Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2007...... 1.34 .09 .11 .90 .12 .13 .51 .38 .32 .14 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Q3... 1.25 .08 .08 .84 .12 .13 .49 .36 .28 .11  Q4... 1.37 .11 .15 .86 .10 .14 .50 .38 .34 .15 2008: Q1... 1.25 .09 .10 .83 .09 .13 .41 .36 .30 .18  Q2... 1.45 .07 .11 1.01 .10 .16 .54 .38 .36 .17  Q3... 1.22 .03 .08 .87 .09 .14 .45 .37 .28 .13  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6941

FELIX ORIAKHI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS BIALESE, Drug Enforcement Agent;

ANTHONY CANNAVALE, DEA; ROBERT HARDING, AUSA;

U. S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 95-8601

FELIX ORIAKHI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CA-93-3574-K, CA-95-1396-K, CR-90-72-K)
2

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felix Oriakhi, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Felix Oriakhi appeals the district court's denials of his

motions for return of property. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. As to

Appeal No. 95-6941, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Oriakhi v. Bialese, No. CA-93-3574-K (D. Md. June 6, 1995).

As to Appeal No. 95-8601, we affirm substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. Oriakhi v. United States, Nos. CR90-72-K; CA-95-1396-K (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1995). While we find that

Oriakhi's claim for return of property is more properly construed

as a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e), we affirm the

district court's denial of relief on this claim on the grounds of

res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. As for Oriakhi's claims

regarding double jeopardy and sentencing, we affirm the district

court's determination that such claims are more properly brought

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 7, 2014

p1104

Order 

Clerk

November 7, 2014

149041(94)

149046

CHARLES MOODY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

GET WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORT,

PROGRESSIVE REHAB CENTER and

CAROL REINTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v SC: 149041

COA: 301784

Wayne CC: 10-006722-AV

HOME OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

CHARLES MOODY,

Plaintiff,

and

GET WELL MEDICAL TRANSPORT,

PROGRESSIVE REHAB CENTER and

CAROL REINTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 149046

COA: 301783

Wayne CC: 10-006722-AV

HOME OWNERS INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

26, 2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, May 7-11, 20Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,002,630 40,983 85,240 103,542 140,427 237,2Number of loans 20,576 7,472 5,539 3,088 2,150 1,60Weighted average maturity (months)1 20.60 11.06 12.42 13.88 20.19 29.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.32 2.44 3.81 5.66 9.28 17.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.21 3.10 3.10 3.03 3.20 3.

Weighted average interest rate4 8.48 9.14 9.06 8.96 8.78 8. Standard error5 .11 .09 .07 .11 .13 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.34 9.87 9.69 9.68 9.65 9.0 25th percentile 7.71 8.50 8.36 8.30 8.02 7. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.72 9.36 8.95 9.09 8.48 8.7 Other livestock 8.16 9.19 8.76 8.46 8.70 7. Other current operating expenses7 8.86 9.15 9.14 9.06 8.95 8.

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.66 9.07 9.07 9.20 9.06 8. Farm real estate 8.00 8.44 8.72 8.42 8.52 8. Other8 7.90 9.08 8.70 8.45 8.25 8.0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 79.38 77.78 75.87 78.58 72.02 74. Under commitment 75.95 86.44 79.27 72.85 72.58 73. Callable 20.89 28.10 28.70 23.96 30.76 20. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.95 2.90 5.57 6.10 5.36 7. Other livestock 4.96 5.19 2.88 5.78 7.50 2. Other current operating expenses7 47.01 77.56 72.33 61.49 62.98 38. Farm machinery and equipment 8.36 4.55 8.36 12.32 3.38 13.0 Farm real estate 8.41 .67 1.04 2.65 7.30 11. Other8 26.32 9.11 9.83 11.66 13.49 26.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.64 4.00 4.87 7.07 15.62 18. Other 82.45 91.57 90.90 88.21 82.86 77.4 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. 09-cr-25-01-SM

Mack L. Ford

ORDER

Re: Document No. 25, Motion To Reconsider Sentencing

Ruling: Denied. While the government cannot, in my view,

invoke the delay occasioned by affording the government an

opportunity to address the issue raised by defendant only to then

invoke that very delay as a basis for denying relief (e.g.

principles of estoppel and the availability of nunc pro tunc relief

preclude such strategems), still, the referenced bill does not

yet constitute applicable law. While one might speculate about the

likelihood of the bill becoming law, speculation alone is

insufficient to justify further, or indefinite, delay in the

administration of justice in this case. Should the Congress pass

the bill, should the President sign it, and should the enacted law

provide for its retroactive application, adequate remedies remain

available to the defendant. 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: April 19, 2010

cc: Debra Walsh, AUSA

David Bownes, Esq. 

 U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00025-SM Document 29 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1