alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonorable Tor A. Craven 

county Auditor, 4LhLan coallt~ 

Waco, Toxar 

Dear Sir: 

rrolato receltlng 

hether or not Artiri1 ststutes or Taxar 

to oherge a is8 ‘of SON 

al in addition to the 

, Vernon’8 Annotated Ciril Statute8, prorlde8, 

“Clerk8 of tlm CountI Court 8hall reoalre 

the Sollolling r888: 

** l l oop irr ot lntrrrogutorler, ero88- 

lntrrro6atorirr and all other paper8 ot reoord 

required to be ooplrd by him, inoladlng eertltloatr oi 8ea1, where the oopf doe8 not l xoeed 800 

rord8,tor l aoh 100 word8 154. #hea the oopy oxorrdr 200 rordr, ior.eaoh additional 100 word8 

ln 010088 0r eoo UOrd8, log l * l Eaoh oertiri- 

.“.-._.^“.--^----..---..-- .- I --_.-- ..-..-., ^-....^- . . . --- .-------- --- ---- 
.-Oat@ to any raot or faotr oontalned In the re- 

., oordr of hlr ofiloa 4th O~rtiflCate and 

when not otherwi8o provided for 80#* * *" 

Beal, 

@enorally rpoakihg, it I8 well l 8tabli8hed in thla State, 

that 8tatUt.8 prerOribill6 tOO8 tOr pobllo OttiOOr8 -0 8triCtlr 

oonetrurd# and honoo a right to ire8 ra1 not rert in inplioatlon. 

(So0 the Oa808 of YoCalla va City ot Rookdalo, Fz46 9. W. 654; 

Binford v. Robinron, Z44 9. W. 8OTi and Tex. Jur., Vol. 34, p. 

608) 

It 18 8tated in Tore8 JWl8PrUdanOe, Volunm 34, page 511: 

‘A8 herrlnbetoro 8totrd, the oompm8ation 

of pub110 officer8 18 tlxed by the Conrtltutlon 

of Texa8. Any ottiorr may not claim or reaoh 

any nonor without a law authorizing hir to do 

8o, and olrerly fixing the amount to rhloh he 

i8 ontitled.' 

It will bo noted that thr foregoing rtatute (hrtiole 3930, 

V. A. C. S) authorize8 a oounty olerk to raoeltr rlrteen cent8 

tor eaoh one hundred word8 wherr t& oopy doe8 not exceed two 

hundred word8 and ten oent for l aoh additional on8 hundred word8 

where the oop y lxoeed8 two hundred word8 tor oopler of lnterrogatorirr, OrO88-interrOgstb?i@8 and all other paper8 or raoordr 

rrqulrrd to bo ooplod 0~ hy, inolnding e8rtlfieato and seal. 

It 18 onr OpinlOn that that prOvi8iOn Oi the 8tatUte reading: 

"raoh orrtifioatr to an7 fact or faotr oontained in tho reoordr 

of hi8 ottloo, rlth oartlfioatr and 8ea1, when not othenviw provided 

tor bo$ * ha8 no applioation whatrooror to tho quortion under oonsiderat i on. 

Theroioro, Jtrr OarOiull~ oonrldering ArtiOlO 3930, V. A. 

c. S., it 18 our opinion that a oountt olork 18 not legally authorlzod to charge a tea oi ility oent8 iOr a oortiflaate and 8eal 

in iurnirhing a oortiflod OOp7 of a will On tile in hi8 offlco. 

fourr 7ort truly
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

United States Air Force, Air Mobility Command, Federal Aviation Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amended notice of intent.

Authority:42 U.S.C. 4321-4347; 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508; and 32 CFR Part 989. 

# SUMMARY:

                        On Thursday, September 18, 2008, the Air Force issued its Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) Beddown and Flight Operations of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) at Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota (                        **Federal Register**                        /Vol. 73, No. 182/pg. 54139).                     

This Amended Notice of Intent extends the scoping period from 30 October 2008 to 21 November 2008, and reflects the collaborative efforts put forth by both the Air Force and FAA, as cooperating agencies, to meet their respective roles and responsibilities in the EIS process. Additional information is available at the project Web site listed below. 

*For Further Information and Comment Submittal Contact:*                         Mr. Doug Allbright, 618-229-0846, HQ AMC/A7PI, 507 Symington Drive; Scott Air Force Base, Illinois 62225 or via the project Web site at:                         *http://www.grandforksuaseis.com.*

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-22778 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
<PAGE>

                                                         Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11


                  Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
             Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                For the Periods

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                July 1, 1999                January 1, 1999
                                                                   through                      through
                                                             September 30, 1999           September 30, 1999
                                                         -----------------------        --------------------
                                                                 (unaudited)                  (unaudited)
<S>                                                      <C>                            <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                                  $   (8,452)                  $  (12,203)
                                                                   ==========                   ==========

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
                                                                    2,210,434                    2,210,434
                                                                   ==========                   ==========

Earnings per Common Share                                          $    (0.01)                  $    (0.01)
                                                                   ==========                   ==========
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                July 1, 1998                January 1, 1998
                                                                   through                      Through
                                                             September 30, 1998           September 30, 1998
                                                         ----------------------          -------------------
                                                                 (unaudited)                  (unaudited)
<S>                                                      <C>                             <C>
Net Income (Loss)                                                   $    7,074                   $    1,634
                                                                    ==========                   ==========

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
                                                                     2,210,434                    2,210,434
                                                                    ==========                   ==========

Earnings per Common Share                                           $     0.00                   $     0.00
                                                                    ==========                   ==========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven Crowell

v. Civil No. 08-cv-295-JL

Canam Steel Corporation

O R D E R

Pursuant to the court's order of September 2, 2008, the

plaintiff has submitted to the clerk's office the computer hard

drive underlying the parties' dispute. Neither party will be

permitted to access the hard drive or view its contents until an

agreement as to how such access and review will be undertaken is

submitted to and approved by the court. The court will not

access the hard drive, and will maintain the hard drive in a

secure area, under the custody and control of the court's

information technology personnel. In the event the parties are

unable to fashion a mutually acceptable procedure to resolve

their dispute by October 1, 2008, each party must file with the

court a proposed order setting forth its respective resolution to

this dispute. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 4, 2008

cc: John Sherman, Esq.

Martha Van Oot, Esq.

Lisa Snow Wade, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00295-JL Document 26 Filed 09/04/08 Page 1 of 1
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, November 3-7Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated 

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 787,864 14,398 55,975 284,959 289,001 56,350 33,436 

Number of loans 16,444 398 1,252 6,886 5,778 1,182 460 

Weighted average maturity (months)1 14.32 8.71 17.85 12.16 13.24 24.21 21.98 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 2.57 3.63 6.59 2.29 1.87 .85 11.62 

Weighted average risk rating3 3.45 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate 4 4.49 4.74 5.22 4.41 4.25 5.12 3.55 

 Standard error5 .12 .59 .32 .18 .13 .21 .92 

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 5.12 6.00 6.35 5.38 4.85 6.17 4.07 

 25th percentile 3.31 4.07 4.07 3.16 3.30 3.82 2.46 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 3.99 5.46 6.01 4.00 3.45 5.01 n.a

 Other livestock 4.19 3.55 4.82 4.36 3.84 4.07 5.71 

 Other current operating expenses7 4.79 4.46 5.14 4.77 4.71 4.92 3.65 

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.96 3.76 5.99 4.93 4.55 7.13 6.40 

 Farm real estate 5.86 3.92 6.29 5.50 5.60 6.43 5.84 

 Other8 4.23 3.60 4.34 4.02 4.16 5.75 3.03 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 90.62 63.26 65.45 91.14 97.46 98.99 61.38 

 Under commitment 92.95 67.37 79.49 92.79 95.95 96.70 93.53 

 Callable 17.08 36.77 46.27 19.20 11.53 6.10 2.41 

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 18.68 41.78 10.79 23.45 21.31 3.20 n.a

 Other livestock 8.06 10.21 20.85 5.45 10.21 8.04 1.05 

 Other current operating expenses7 38.46 41.85 47.66 41.30 37.21 64.00 14.87 

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.92 .44 3.60 5.77 5.64 .19 6.53 

 Farm real estate 3.48 2.95 8.07 1.23 3.49 9.10 6.33 

 Other8 26.41 2.78 9.04 22.81 22.14 15.48 71.22 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 5.87 7.75 10.49 4.65 3.58 12.64 14.74 

 Other 89.07 91.36 81.28 88.23 95.46 86.97 51.26 

 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-465-SM

Kevin Clark

O R D E R

The prison (Sing Sing) has failed and refused to comply with

this court’s orders and plaintiff’s authorizations to pay initial

filing fees. Plaintiff has therefore been denied any opportunity

to have his complaints considered. He is hereby granted pro se

status and his files will be preliminarily reviewed.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: April 15, 2009

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00465-SM Document 15 Filed 04/15/09 Page 1 of 1
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2003: Q3... 1.58 .08 .09 1.17 .10 .14 .94 .33 .24 .08  Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### In the Matter of Qwasan M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 881]

In two juvenile delinquency proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Qwasan M. appeals (1), as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated July 23, 2004, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 5, 2004, made upon his admission, finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and upon adjudging him to be a juvenile delinquent, placed him with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months (docket No. D-2808/04), and (2) from an order of disposition of the same court dated August 18, 2004 (docket No. D-2810/04).

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition dated August 18, 2004, is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements *{see*22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition dated July 23, 2004, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order of disposition dated July 23, 2004 (docket No. D-2808/04), is limited to the placement of the appellant with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 12 months. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as the period of placement has expired, and a subsequent order extending placement has been entered, from which no appeal has been taken *(see Matter of Shamasia M.,*4 AD3d 359, 361 [2004]; *Matter of Jonathan G.,*278 AD2d 324, 325 [2000]; *Matter of Arthur C.,*260 AD2d 478, 479 [1999]; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Rozella S.],*255 AD2d 316, 316 [1998]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1995: Q1... 100 * 2.00 1.00 1.00 9.00 7.00 27.00 27.00 15.00 11.00 * * .01 * 1996: Q1... 100 * 4.00 23.00 5.00 19.00 26.00 18.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * * .01 * 1997: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 10.00 31.00 33.00 17.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1998: Q1... 100 * .01 13.00 4.00 23.00 32.00 22.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1999: Q1... 100 .01 4.00 17.00 17.00 29.00 23.00 9.00 2.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 2000: Q1... 100 * .01 5.00 4.00 30.00 36.00 18.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2001: Q1... 100 .01 * 8.00 7.00 28.00 33.00 17.00 5.00 2.00 .01 .01 * .01 .01 2002: Q1... 100 23.76 17.31 19.76 23.14 10.76 4.30 .80 .00 .00 * .00 .00 * .00 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * * 2003: Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * *  Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest rfrom the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,234,365
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,820,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,881,200
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     34,854,650
<ALLOWANCE>                                    597,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,858,673
<DEPOSITS>                                  40,959,015
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            248,032
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,792,290
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,109,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              49,858,673
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,103,374
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              316,086
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               130,615
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,550,075
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,131,052
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,146,261
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,403,814
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  164,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,155,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                270,610
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     270,610
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.66
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     5,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               434,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              597,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           597,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-78-01-SM

Christopher Robinson

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 31) is

granted.. Trial has been rescheduled for April 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than March 7, 2008. On the filing of such

waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:07-cr-00078-SM Document 32 Filed 03/03/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: March 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM 

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

March 3, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Peter Papps, Esq.

 James Dennehy, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00078-SM Document 32 Filed 03/03/08 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David Clegg, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00300-JL

Gary S. Fischer, et al.

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

February 2, 2009.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 13) is approved as

submitted, with the following changes:

• Third party joinder deadline - April 1, 2009

• DiBennedetto disclosure deadline - April 1, 2009

• Trial - March, 2010

Based on the discussions between the court and

counsel/parties at the conference, the following are stricken

without prejudice to being reinstated on request if warranted by

the evidence:

• Counts 6 and 7 of the Complaint.

• the following affirmative defenses: None

Case 1:08-cv-00300-JL Document 17 Filed 02/02/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: February 2, 2009

cc: Jeffrey R. Mazer, Esq.

Daniel J. Mullen, Esq.

David A. Garfunkel, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00300-JL Document 17 Filed 02/02/09 Page 2 of 2