alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 05-cr-33-01-PB

Keith Materas

The defendant has moved to continue the February 7, 2006 trial in the above

case. Defendant cites the need for additional time to correct a misunderstanding with

the government regarding circumstances surrounding the defendant's entry of a plea. 

The government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, in order to allow the parties additional time to negotiate a plea

agreement, or properly prepare for trial, the court will continue the trial from February

7, 2006 to March 7, 2006. In agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to

18 U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice served

in granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in

a speedy trial.

Case 1:05-cr-00033-PB Document 28 Filed 01/27/06 Page 1 of 2
2

The January 26, 2006 change of plea hearing is cancelled; a final pretrial

conference is scheduled for February 16, 2006 at 3:00 PM.

SO ORDERED.

January 27, 2006 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

 Paul Barbadoro

 United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cr-00033-PB Document 28 Filed 01/27/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Virgil CASH and Fred Cash, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Dec. 17, 1954.

See also Fla., 73 So.2d 903.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.            Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2019-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.            Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.            Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.            Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
#### Mrs. Coline DE ROSE (formerly Mrs. Richard Bailey), Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL GIN COMPANY et al., Appellees. Wyman C. LOWE, Adm’r, Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL GIN COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Sept. 19, 1956.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

James Flanders

Criminal No . 08-cr-162-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

17) filed by defendant is granted in part, trial is continued to

April 21, 2009 .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : February 4, 200 9

cc : Glenn

Terry

U .S .

U .S .

Geiger ,

Ollila ,

Marsha l

Probation

Esq .

Esq .

Case 1:08-cr-00162-JD Document 19 Filed 02/04/09 Page 1 of 1
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF
 CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
 
 I, Kee Chan Sin, certify that:
 
 (a) A review of Cellco Partnership’s activities and of its performance under the Transfer and
        Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2019 (the “Transfer and Servicing Agreement”), among Verizon ABS LLC, as depositor, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), marketing agent and custodian,
        and Verizon Owner Trust 2019-A, as issuer, during the period from March 13, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has been made under my supervision.
 
 (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
        obligations under the Transfer and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period from March 13, 2019 to December 31, 2019.
 
 March 30, 2020
 
 By:   /s/ Kee Chan Sin
 Kee Chan Sin
 Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
 Cellco Partnership, as Servicer of Verizon Owner Trust 2019-A
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                             
                                 Estimated volume                 Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                               (percent)
                      ______________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                             
1997......    |          93       6      19      19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4      15      24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37      35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17      34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53     140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50      58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35      48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17      46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8      16      12       24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |          73       9       7      23       34      .146      .018      .015     .045      .064
2007......    |          90       8      13      23       47      .170      .014      .025     .042      .085
2008......    |        n.a.      12      20      42     n.a.      n.a.      .022      .037     .074      n.a.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q2... 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 8.1 7.6

2008: Q1... 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q3... 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q4... 6.2 6.4 6.1

2009: Q1... 6.0 6.1 5.9

 Q2... 6.0 6.2 5.9

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q2... 9.1 8.8 8.2

 Q3... 9.0 8.7 8.1

 Q4... 8.5 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... 7.4 7.2 6.7

 Q2... 7.1 6.9 6.6

 Q3... 7.0 6.9 6.5

 Q4... 6.7 6.7 6.4

2009: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.2

 Q2... 6.5 6.5 6.2

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2007: Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.3

 Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.8

 Q4... 8.3 8.4 8.4

2008: Q1... 7.5 7.6 7.7

 Q2... 6.6 6.8 6.8

 Q3... 6.8 7.3 7.1

 Q4... 5.5 5.9 5.8

2009: Q1... 5.7 6.1 6.0

 Q2... 5.9 6.5 6.5

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2030 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2030

 To prohibit issuance of a visa, or admission to the United States, of 
 any physician who is a citizen of the People's Republic of China and 
   who seeks to enter for the purpose of training in organ or bodily 
                        tissue transplantation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2001

      Ms. Ros-Lehtinen (for herself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. 
  Rohrabacher, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Chabot) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit issuance of a visa, or admission to the United States, of 
 any physician who is a citizen of the People's Republic of China and 
   who seeks to enter for the purpose of training in organ or bodily 
                        tissue transplantation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, Notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, the Secretary of State shall not issue an 
immigrant or nonimmigrant visa to, and the Attorney General shall not 
admit to the United States, any physician (as such term is used in 
Immigration and Nationality Act) who is a citizen of the People's 
Republic of China who seeks the visa or admission to the United States 
for the purpose of training in organ or bodily tissue transplantation.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

v.

AQUAN SPEARMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 21 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2021, Petitioner’s Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and Petitioner’s Application for Extraordinary Relief Under 

the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction Motion to Lift Detainer and for Release on House 

Arrest is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                 |                              |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|    |                                                            |                         |
|         |                                                                 | /s/              Robert H. Daskal |
|         | Robert              H. Daskal                                        |
|         | Chief                Financial OfficerAugust                11, 2006 |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1443
T. M. VISWANATHAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA; C. D. SPANGLER, JR., in his official capacity; FAYETTEVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES; JESSEE WILLIAMS, DR., in his official and indi vidual capacity; LLOYD V. HACKLEY, DR., in his official and individual capacity; LEO EDWARDS, DR., in his official and individual capacity; JON YOUNG, DR., in his official and individual capacity; MORRIS BLOUNT, DR., in his official and individual capacity; JOSEPH MONROE, DR., in his official and individual capacity; CLARENCE WHITE, DR., in his official and individual capacity; KAYE WEBB, in her official and individual capacity; FELTON THOMAS, DR., in his individual and official capacity; ALL DEFENDANTS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Hiram H. Ward, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-528-1) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. T. M. Viswanathan, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas J. Ziko, Celia Grasty Jones, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting Defendants' motion to dismiss and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Viswanathan v. Board of Governors , No. CA-94-528-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar . 1 & Apr. 24, 1996). In light of the disposition of the appeal, we deny Appellant's motion to vacate order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Thelbert E. OSBORNE v. MOSSLER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al.

No. 2773.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1946.

J. S. Pickett, of Many, for appellant.

S. I. Foster, of Leesville, for appellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation et al., La.App., 24 So.2d 655, it is ordered that the appeal in the above entitled case be and the same is hereby dismissed at the cost of appellant.
IV 

House Calendar No. 166 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 859 

[Report No. 110–487] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 2082) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence 

Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2082) to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal year 2008 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, the 

Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to acVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:32 Dec 12, 2007 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR859.RH HR859

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 859 RH 

1 company the bill (H.R. 2082) to authorize appropriations 

2 for fiscal year 2008 for intelligence and intelligence-re3 lated activities of the United States Government, the Com4 munity Management Account, and the Central Intelligence 

5 Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 

6 purposes. All points of order against the conference report 

7 and against its consideration are waived. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 166 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 859 

[Report No. 110

–487] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

for other purposes. Agency Retirement and Disability System, and agement Account, and the Central Intelligence United States Government, the Community Manligence and intelligence-related activities of the appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for intelto accompany the bill (H.R. 2082) to authorize 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-mc-57-JD

Gerard M. Schena

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated

October 1, 2008, no objection having been filed.

Gerard M. Schena, is ordered to obey the summons and appear on November 17, 2008 at

10:00 a.m. at 195 Commerce Way, Suite B, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, before J.L. Shing, to

give testimony and produce all books and records in his possession or control required and called

for by the terms of the summons of April 8, 2008. 

It is further ordered that the government be awarded its costs. 

SO ORDERED.

November 10, 2008 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Gretchen Leah Witt, AUSA

Gerard M. Schena, pro se

Case 1:08-mc-00057-JD Document 6 Filed 11/10/08 Page 1 of 1
Blueprint





 





 


 

 


 


First
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Kim R. Tsuchimoto
(“Executive”) and Monopar Therapeutics Inc.
(“Company”) dated November 1, 2017. The following
amendments are made effective March 1, 2018. All other unrevised
sections remain in full force.

 


 


2.1 Position and Duties, Executive will
devote Executive’s best efforts and 50% of Executive’s
business time and attention (except for vacation periods and
reasonable periods of illness or other incapacities permitted by
the Company’s general employment policies or as otherwise set
forth in this Agreement) to the business of the
Company.

 


 

 


3.1 Base Salary, Executive shall receive
for services to be rendered hereunder an annual base salary of
$137,500 representing 50% of full-time.


 


3.3 Standard Company Benefits, Executive
shall be entitled to all benefits offered by the Company so long as
Executive devotes 50% or more time to the business of the Company.
In lieu of benefits, Executive shall be reimbursed up to $1,800 per
month for out-of-pocket expenses for medical, dental and vision
benefits until such time the Company has benefit plans in place.
Based upon 50% service, Executive shall be entitled each year to
two (2) weeks leave for vacation at full pay, provided, that the
maximum amount Executive may have accrued at any point in time is
two (2) weeks (meaning that once Executive has accrued two (2)
weeks, Executive will not accrue any additional vacation time until
she takes vacation and falls below the two (2) week accrual
cap).

 


 


Pursuant to section
6.1(a) Other Activities, Exhibit
A


 


25% of
full-time employment with no benefits at Mercaptor Discoveries Inc.
as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and
Co-Founder


 


Minimal
time, as needed, at DNAcheckup as a volunteer Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

 


 


Requested
by:


 


/s/ Kim
R. Tsuchimoto

 


February 26,
2018



Kim R.
Tsuchimoto                                                                            

Date






 

 


 


Approved
by:


 


/s/
Chandler D. Robinson



                                                                          

March 1,
2018






 



Chandler D.
Robinson                                                                            

Date






Monopar
Therapeutics Inc.

 


Co-Founder, Chief
Executive Officer and Director