alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: October 04, 2006
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2115

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A ACT

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of

the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and

construction of a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater

within and outside of the service area of the Lakehaven

Utility District, Washington.
2

HR 2115 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF LAKEHAVEN, WASH4 INGTON, WASTEWATER RECLAMATION AND

5 REUSE PROJECT.

6 The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater

7 Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–575, title XVI;

8 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following:

10 ‘‘SEC. 1635. LAKEHAVEN, WASHINGTON, WATER RECLAMA11 TION AND REUSE PROJECT.

12 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera13 tion with the Lakehaven Utility District, Washington, is

14 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con15 struction of, and land acquisition for, a project to reclaim

16 and reuse wastewater, including degraded groundwaters,

17 within and outside of the service area of the Lakehaven

18 Utility District.

19 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost

20 of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed

21 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

22 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide

23 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project

24 authorized by this section.’’.
3

HR 2115 RFS

1 SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

2 The table of sections in section 2 of such Act is

3 amended by inserting after the item relating to section

4 1634 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1635. Lakehaven, Washington, Water Reclamation and Reuse Project.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2040

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a nonrefundable

tax credit against income tax for individuals who purchase energy efficient appliances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. LANTOS, Mr.

HINCHEY, Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. MATSUI, Ms. RIVERS,

Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr.

SANDERS, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missiouri, Ms. SOLIS, Mr.

ALLEN, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. MOORE, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr. MCDERMOTT,

Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. WATERS, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. NORTON, Mr. BONIOR,

and Mr. STUPAK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

for a nonrefundable tax credit against income tax for

individuals who purchase energy efficient appliances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Efficient Appli5 ances Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2040 IH

1 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub3 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is

5 amended by inserting after section 25A the following new

6 section:

7 ‘‘SEC. 25B. PURCHASE OF ENERGY EFFICIENT APPLIANCES.

8 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of an in9 dividual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax

10 imposed by this chapter an amount equal to 50 percent

11 of the amount paid by the taxpayer for the purchase of

12 any qualified energy efficient appliance.

13 ‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS.—

14 ‘‘(1) DOLLAR LIMIT.—The credit allowed under

15 subsection (a) shall not exceed $1,000 for each indi16 vidual for a taxable year.

17 ‘‘(2) APPROPRIATE DISPOSITION OF OLD APPLI18 ANCES REQUIRED.—In the case of a taxpayer pur19 chasing a qualified energy efficient appliance to re20 place an energy inefficient appliance, the credit al21 lowed under subsection (a) shall not apply unless the

22 taxpayer disposes of the energy inefficient appliance

23 appropriately.

24 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED ENERGY EFFICIENT

25 APPLIANCE.—For purposes of this section, the term

26 ‘qualified energy efficient appliance’ means a clothes
3

•HR 2040 IH

1 washer, clothes dryer, refrigerator, dishwasher, water

2 heater, or room air conditioner that meets the qualifying

3 levels established by the Secretary of Energy for inclusion

4 in the Department of Energy’s Energy Star program.’’.

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

6 for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1

7 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relat8 ing to section 25A the following new item:

‘‘25B. Purchase of energy efficient appliances.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to tax11 able years beginning after December 31, 2001.

Æ
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1768

For the relief of Thomas Patrick McEvoy.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. BONIOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Thomas Patrick McEvoy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL INCOME FOR

4 PURPOSES OF CALCULATING THE RATE OF

5 VETERANS’ NON-SERVICE-CONNECTED DIS6 ABILITY PENSION.

7 For purposes of calculating the annual rate of non8 service-connected disability pension paid to Thomas Pat9 rick McEvoy of Macomb Township, Michigan, under sec10 tion 1521 of title 38, United States Code, the Secretary

11 of Veterans Affairs shall exclude from the determination

12 of the annual income of Thomas Patrick McEvoy under
2

•HR 1768 IH

1 section 1503 of title 38, United States Code, any disability

2 insurance benefit to which Thomas Patrick McEvoy is en3 titled for such year under section 223 of the Social Secu4 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 423).

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 206

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the child care

credit for lower-income working parents, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. SWEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the child care credit for lower-income working parents,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Tax Credit

5 Reform Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. CHILD CARE CREDIT AMENDMENTS.

7 (a) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF EMPLOYMENT-RE8 LATED EXPENSES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.—

9 (1) 1 QUALIFYING INDIVIDUAL.—Paragraph (1)

10 of section 21(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of
2

•HR 206 IH

1 1986 (relating to dollar limit on amount creditable)

2 is amended by striking ‘‘$2,400’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘$3,600’’.

4 (2) 2 OR MORE QUALIFYING INDIVIDUALS.—

5 Paragraph (2) of section 21(c) of such Code (relat6 ing to dollar limit on amount creditable) is amended

7 by striking ‘‘$4,800’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,400’’.

8 (b) DENIAL OF CREDIT TO TAXPAYERS WHOSE AD9 JUSTED GROSS INCOME IS $50,000 OR MORE.—Para10 graph (2) of section 21(a) of such Code (defining applica11 ble percentage) is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘(but not below 20 percent)’’

13 and inserting ‘‘(but not below zero)’’, and

14 (2) by striking ‘‘1 percentage point for each

$2,000 (or fraction thereof)’’ and inserting ‘‘11 15 ⁄2

16 percentage points for each full $2,000’’.

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

19 December 31, 2000.

Æ
#### Glen W. EASTER; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NEVADA STATE BANK; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16499.

D.C. No. CV-02-00146-JCM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 13, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Glen W. Easter and Honey G. Easter appeal pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing their action against Nevada State Bank and Wells Fargo Bank alleging violation of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim. *Patenaude v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y,*290 F.3d 1020, 1023 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Easters’ action because the RFPA does not apply to state and local governments. *See*12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3403 (limit*356ing access by the federal government to personal financial records). The Easters’ sole contention on appeal is that the RFPA should be read more broadly to encompass the actions of the City of North Las Vegas and the Clark County District Attorney. This contention fails because the RFPA defines “Government authority” as “any agency or department of the United States, or any officer, employee, or agent thereof,” 12 U.S.C. § 3401(3), and nothing in the statutory context or legislative history supports deviating from the statute’s plain meaning. *See Patenaude,*290 F.3d at 1025 (plain language of a statute is conclusive absent clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (274 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 9 Gross Value of Final Products and Nonindustrial Supplies  Item
2009
2015
2015
2016Q1[r]
2015
2016Q3
Q4[r]
Nov.[r]
Dec.[r]
Jan.[r]
Feb.[r]
Mar.[r]
Apr.[p]Final products and nonindustrialsupplies
3,234.7
3,633.2
3,655.3
3,627.0
3,636.9
3,622.9
3,608.1
3,641.8
3,646.9
3,621.8
3,658.5Final products
2,407.9
2,701.2
2,724.7
2,686.7
2,698.9
2,681.7
2,670.1
2,699.8
2,708.0
2,688.9
2,718.7Consumer goods
1,790.5
1,939.2
1,960.2
1,937.9
1,955.1
1,935.7
1,926.1
1,955.4
1,962.1
1,947.8
1,973.0Durable
351.6
500.2
510.8
509.8
516.9
506.7
510.4
516.3
519.7
514.8
522.1Automotive products
197.7
334.0
343.8
341.8
349.6
339.6
341.2
348.3
352.9
347.6
354.3Other durable goods
153.9
166.7
167.6
168.5
168.1
167.6
169.7
168.7
167.7
167.9
168.6Nondurable
1,438.9
1,454.2
1,465.3
1,444.0
1,454.2
1,444.8
1,431.6
1,455.2
1,458.5
1,449.1
1,467.1Equipment, total
617.4
769.0
771.4
755.6
751.0
752.8
750.7
751.6
753.1
748.2
753.1Business and defense
600.0
756.1
760.6
745.9
743.2
743.0
741.4
742.5
745.8
741.4
747.0Business
483.3
646.5
652.0
637.3
634.9
634.6
632.0
634.2
637.2
633.3
639.0Defense and space
116.8
110.3
109.3
109.3
109.0
109.1
110.0
108.9
109.3
108.8
108.8Nonindustrial supplies
826.8
933.1
931.2
942.0
939.3
943.0
940.0
943.6
940.2
934.2
940.9Construction supplies
232.1
278.5
277.7
282.1
282.6
281.8
282.4
283.4
282.2
282.2
281.9Business supplies
594.7
654.8
653.8
660.1
656.8
661.5
657.6
660.3
658.2
651.9
659.2Commercial energy products
218.5
232.1
231.4
233.5
232.0
234.0
231.8
234.0
232.4
229.7
235.9     Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 394,700 23,944 39,279 45,986 84,605 146,15Number of loans 12,521 6,201 2,575 1,430 1,229 92Weighted average maturity (months)1 18.60 12.64 17.30 19.12 29.63 15.5

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 10.80 6.87 11.98 10.74 17.67 7.6

Weighted average risk rating3 2.26 2.37 2.43 2.50 2.65 2.1

Weighted average interest rate4 8.27 8.53 8.50 8.18 8.24 8.2

 Standard error5 .11 .10 .04 .14 .11 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 8.82 9.10 9.03 8.82 8.93 8.9 25th percentile 7.64 8.00 7.96 7.62 7.71 7.5 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.16 8.34 8.00 7.61 8.33 8.3 Other livestock 8.56 8.94 9.00 8.38 8.60 8.4 Other current operating expenses7 8.28 8.49 8.44 8.36 8.33 8.3

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.48 8.20 8.92 8.10 8.50 8.5 Farm real estate 7.38 7.95 n.a. 7.89 7.46 6.8 Other8 8.35 10.20 7.75 7.91 8.10 8.6

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 39.55 44.94 43.02 43.27 37.97 39.5 Under commitment 44.56 59.09 48.84 48.09 37.78 43.3 Callable 18.65 25.38 25.86 20.91 20.87 14.6 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.55 8.05 6.86 14.72 9.95 3.7 Other livestock 9.68 10.04 6.47 9.94 15.56 10.6 Other current operating expenses7 66.28 67.92 67.54 53.57 53.31 76.3

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.75 11.12 16.03 12.44 1.85 1.7 Farm real estate 4.65 .63 n.a. 4.57 14.40 2.6 Other8 6.10 2.23 3.10 4.76 4.93 4.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.29 3.38 6.01 7.93 24.93 10.8 Other 84.71 89.19 87.80 88.69 72.54 89.2 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-570-942]


Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from the People's 
Republic of China: Notice of Postponement of Preliminary Determination 
in the Countervailing Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 29, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Holland or Yasmin Nair, AD/CVD 
Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1279 and (202) 482-3813, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 20, 2008, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
initiated the countervailing duty investigation of certain kitchen 
appliance shelving and racks from the People's Republic of China. See 
Notice of Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation: Certain 
Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from the People's Republic of 
China, 73 FR 50304 (August 26, 2008). Currently, the preliminary 
determination is due no later than October 24, 2008.

Postponement of Due Date for Preliminary Determination

    On September 17, 2008, the Department received a request from 
Nashville Wire Products Inc., SSW Holding Company, Inc., United Steel, 
Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial 
and Service Workers International Union, and the International 
Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 6 
(Clinton, IA) (collectively, ``the petitioners'') to postpone the 
preliminary determination of the countervailing duty investigation of 
certain kitchen appliance shelving and racks from the PRC. Under 
section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
the Department may extend the period for reaching a preliminary 
determination in a countervailing duty investigation until no later 
than the 130th day after the date on which the administering authority 
initiates an investigation if the petitioner makes a timely request for 
an extension of the period within which the determination must be made 
under section 703(b) of the Act. In accordance with section 351.205(e) 
of the Department's regulations, the petitioners' request for 
postponement of the preliminary determination was made 25 days or more 
before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination. 
Accordingly, we are extending the due date for the preliminary 
determination by 59 days to no later than December 22, 2008.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) 
of the Act.

    Dated: September 22, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22886 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall

v. Civil No. 08-cv-493-JL

William Albrecht 

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated April 24, 2009, no objection having been filed, despite repeated

extensions.

SO ORDERED.

July 10, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Kevin Hall, Pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00493-JL Document 20 Filed 07/10/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-36-PB

Dwight Bennett

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for October 6, 2009 citing the need for

additional time to complete a court-ordered rehabilitation

program in which he is enrolled and to prepare for trial. The

government does not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from October 6, 2009 to December 1, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00036-PB Document 23 Filed 09/28/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The September 28, 2009 final pretrial conference is

continued to November 24, 2009 at 3:15 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 25, 2009

cc: Donald Kennedy, Esq

Terry Ollila, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00036-PB Document 23 Filed 09/28/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David R. Proverb

v. Civil No. 08-cv-431-PB

Hillsborough County Department

of Corrections, Superintendent et al

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $20.00 is due when his account is

replenished. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account is to be remitted by the

Hillsborough County Department of Corrections when the amount in

the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been

paid. Failure to pay the fee as ordered will result in dismissal

of the action without prejudice. In all other respects

plaintiff’s request for in forma pauperis has been granted. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 22, 2008

cc: David R. Proverb

 Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

 Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Inmate 

 Accounts

Case 1:08-cv-00431-PB Document 3 Filed 10/22/08 Page 1 of 1