alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1925

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability

and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site

Area in Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park

System, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1925 EH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAM2 MOTH SITE AREA.

3 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior, in con4 sultation with the State of Texas, the city of Waco, and

5 other appropriate organizations, shall carry out a special

6 resource study regarding the national significance, suit7 ability, and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth

8 Site Area located in the city of Waco, Texas, as a unit

9 of the National Park System.

10 (b) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section

11 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall

12 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required

13 by this section.

14 SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF STUDY RESULTS.

15 Not later than 3 years after funds are first made

16 available for this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the

17 Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives

18 and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of

19 the Senate a report describing the results of the study.

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1925

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the

suitability and feasibility of designating the WacoMammoth Site Area in Waco, Texas, as a unitof the National Park System, and for other purposes.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Claremont Savings Bank

v. Civil No. 08-cv-297-JM

Jerry L. Rich

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from this case.

SO ORDERED.

August 28, 2008 /s/James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: James G. Feleen, Esq.

R. Matthew Cairns, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00297-PB Document 6 Filed 08/28/08 Page 1 of 1
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 670,394 37,743 55,546 71,738 112,048 161,23Number of loans 18,629 9,395 3,775 2,195 1,682 1,09Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.47 11.80 15.50 22.37 20.43 36.5

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 10.00 6.61 8.25 12.09 10.31 11.9

Weighted average risk rating3 2.59 2.57 2.37 2.42 2.34 2.8

Weighted average interest rate4 6.42 6.99 6.84 6.38 6.10 6.3

 Standard error5 .10 .14 .18 .14 .29 .1 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.00 7.75 7.50 7.20 6.75 7.2 25th percentile 5.95 6.11 6.09 5.51 5.51 5.8 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.35 6.79 5.52 5.92 6.89 6.3 Other livestock 6.93 7.49 8.09 7.01 5.80 7.0 Other current operating expenses7 6.38 6.95 6.75 6.49 6.13 6.0

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.48 7.19 6.99 6.37 6.12 6.9 Farm real estate 6.24 7.67 6.90 6.89 6.03 6.0 Other8 5.95 5.99 5.85 5.92 6.04 5.8

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 43.23 44.60 46.69 39.56 54.00 58.4 Under commitment 50.88 62.92 51.62 52.95 40.21 58.2 Callable 28.97 27.85 29.18 17.85 29.06 28.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.33 2.13 5.11 16.59 2.94 9.2 Other livestock 8.62 8.93 10.90 6.39 9.57 20.4 Other current operating expenses7 67.50 79.38 65.90 51.24 57.14 52.1

 Farm machinery and equipment 9.76 5.54 12.99 10.55 12.66 7.4 Farm real estate 4.34 1.40 2.39 5.26 10.86 6.9 Other8 3.46 2.62 2.72 9.97 6.83 3.6

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 17.88 9.86 8.37 17.60 17.11 24.4 Other 74.28 83.03 88.52 78.11 79.20 75.5 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
#### William Clifford CHAMBERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Jan. 21, 1955.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

James M . Smolinsky

v . Civil No. 08-cv-210-JD

US Social Security Administration, Commissioner

ORDE R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated April 24, 2009 .

SO ORDERED.

May 12, 2009 /s/.loseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Francis Jackson, Esq.

Karen Fitzmaurice, Esq .

Gretchen Leah Witt, Esq .

Case 1:08-cv-00210-JD Document 15 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned,
Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 14, 2006

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Cerence Inc.

Burlington, Massachusetts

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-234040) of Cerence Inc. of our report dated December 19, 2019, relating to the combined financial statements of the Cerence business of Nuance Communications, Inc (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the Company’s change in method of accounting for revenue from contracts with customers due to the adoption of the new revenue standard), which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

December 19, 2019
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1876

To suspend temporarily the duty on nelfilcon polymer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. ISAKSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on nelfilcon polymer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.39.01 Nelfilcon polymer

(provided for in

subheading

3905.99.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•HR 1876 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES —OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Michael E. Jalbert, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report.

 
| ** ** | ** ** | **/S/ Michael E. Jalbert**    |
|------------|------------|-------------------------------|
|       |       | Michael E. Jalbert            |
|       |       | Chief Executive Officer       |
|       |       | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

**October 29,2008**

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Markem Corporation

v. Civil No. 07-cv-6-SM

Zipher Ltd. 

Videojet Technologies, Inc.

O R D E R

Markem seeks a version of a Protective Order that permits

counsel and experts in similar cases in the U.K. access to the

discovery in this case. 

Ultimately, protective orders rely on the contempt power of

the court for enforcement. U.K. lawyers and experts are not

subject to the jurisdiction of this court and its power of

contempt. Additionally, U.K. judges can determine what is

discoverable under English law and this court will make Rule 26

decisions in this case. A stipulated protective order for this

case is appropriate, but it is not the business of this court to

accommodate its orders in this case to the needs or desires of

counsel in foreign cases.

Case 1:07-cv-00006-PB Document 49 Filed 10/12/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The motion (document no. 38) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: October 12, 2007

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cv-00006-PB Document 49 Filed 10/12/07 Page 2 of 2
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1994...... 100.0 85.5 12.3 1.9 .2 .1 .0

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997: Q1... 100.0 79.1 16.7 3.7 .4 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dawn Scovill

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00226-JL

Stephanie Gray

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

August 13, 2008 at 2 p.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00226-JL Document 11 Filed 08/06/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 6, 2008

cc: David P. Cullenberg, Esq.

Wilfred J. Desmarais, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00226-JL Document 11 Filed 08/06/08 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Resources, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwardG. Caminos, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to andsolely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Edward G. Caminos*  | * * |
|--------------------------|----------|
| Edward G.  Caminos       |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| May 9, 2008         |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                          Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11

                  Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
             Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                For the Periods

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              January 1, 2001   January 1, 2000
                                  through           through
                               March 31, 2001    March 31, 2000
                              ----------------  ----------------
                                (unaudited)       (unaudited)
<S>                           <C>               <C>

Net income                         $  121,478        $    6,524
                                   ==========        ==========

Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding           4,203,292         3,890,347
                                   ==========        ==========

Earnings per Common Share          $     0.03        $     0.00
                                   ==========        ==========
</TABLE>
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1993...... 24 2 4 7 11 .121 .010 .018 .035 .054

1994...... 10 1 1 3 6 .048 .003 .003 .013 .026

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... n.a. 1 5 n.a. n.a. n.a. .003 .012 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
Exhibit
10.32




AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO




FOREBEARANCE AND WARRANT
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of May
6, 2009 (this “Amendment”), to that certain forbearance and waiver modification
agreement, dated February 25, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and between NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), and
BEDFORD OAK PARTNERS,
L.P. (the “Lender “).





W I T N E S S E T
H




WHEREAS, as of the date hereof there is
currently a principal amount of $250,000 due the Lender; and




WHEREAS,
the Company and the Lender wish to amend the Agreement on the terms set forth
herein.




NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises herein
contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Agreement
as follows:




1.           Definitions; References;
Continuation of Agreement.  Unless otherwise specified herein,
each term used herein that is defined in the Agreement shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the Agreement.  Each reference to “hereof,”
“hereto,” “hereunder,” “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference,
and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference,
contained in the Agreement shall from and after the date hereof refer to the
Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as amended hereby, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall continue unmodified and remain in full force
and effect.  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
having the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




2.           Amendment.  Section
3 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: the date “May 1, 2009” is
hereby deleted and in its place and stead the date “May 12, 2009” is
inserted.




3.           Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken
together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become
effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the
other party, it being understood that both parties need not sign the same
counterpart.  In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile
transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature
shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose
behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such
facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original thereof.





4.           Governing
Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed on the date first above written.




NATIONAL HOLDINGS
CORPORATION






By:  /S/ MARK
GOLDWASSER


Mark
Goldwasser, CEO








BEDFORD OAKS PARTNERS,
L.P.







By:  /S/ HARVEY
EISEN


Harvey
Eisen, Chairman and Managing Partner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

STEVEN A. SWAN ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil No. 06-CV-404-JAW 

 ) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

ORDER ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

 On August 21, 2007, Steven Swan filed a notice of appeal from this Court’s Order 

Affirming the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge entered on July 25, 2007. Mr. 

Swan then filed a motion with the First Circuit requesting a certificate of appealability. On 

November 26, 2007, Mr. Swan filed a motion with this Court asking for a ruling on “the motion I 

mistakenly filed with Circuit Justice of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, David 

H. Souter, for a Certificate of Appealability from the denial of my 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion 

rather than forcing me to compose and submit a new motion to this Court.” Pet’rs Mot. (Docket 

# 41). 

 The Court GRANTS Mr. Swan’s motion requesting this Court rule on his motion for a 

certificate of appealability. (Docket # 41). However, it being the opinion of this Court that no 

substantial question would be presented for decision on appeal, the Court DENIES Mr. Swan’s 

request for a certificate of appealability. F. R. App. 22(b). 

 SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.

 JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 SITTING BY DESIGNATION 

Dated this 9th day of January, 2008 

Case 1:06-cv-00404-JAW Document 42 Filed 01/09/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Michael W. Levin |
|----------------------|

Michael W. Levin

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 14, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.