alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          57,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  382,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,142,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,615,942
<PP&E>                                       7,752,946
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,986,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,479,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,146,111
<BONDS>                                      3,181,787
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,463,222
<COMMON>                                    10,588,311
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,900,370)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,479,061
<SALES>                                      1,293,443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,294,943
<CGS>                                        1,091,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,091,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (278,221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (278,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (278,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1872 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1872

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 
            to individuals who donate their organs at death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2001

  Mr. Hansen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit 
            to individuals who donate their organs at death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gift of Life Tax Credit Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR ORGAN DONATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) 
is amended by redesignating section 35 as section 36 and by inserting 
after section 34 the following new section:

``SEC. 35. ORGAN DONATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--In the case of an eligible individual, there 
shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle 
the amount of $10,000 for the taxable year which includes the date of 
the individual's death.
    ``(b) Eligible Individual.--For purposes of this section, the term 
`eligible individual' means any individual if--
            ``(1) before such individual's death, such individual made 
        a clear declaration of intent to donate any of such 
        individual's organs at death for transplantation,
            ``(2) such declaration was made while the individual was 
        legally competent and at least 18 years of age,
            ``(3) such individual's death is not the result of a 
        suicide, and
            ``(4) one or more of such individual's organs is donated at 
        death for transplantation under a program approved by the 
        Secretary of Health and Human Services.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 31, United 
        States Code, is amended by inserting before the period ``, or 
        from section 35 of such Code''.
            (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part IV of 
        subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking 
        the last item and inserting the following new items:

                              ``Sec. 35. Organ donations.
                              ``Sec. 36. Overpayments of tax.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

 Marie Devin

v. Case No. 08-cv-242-PB

US Social Security Administration,

 Commissioner

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 6, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

June 4, 2009 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00242-PB Document 14 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,018
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             922
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,993
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              30
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                30
<LOANS>                                         32,879
<ALLOWANCE>                                        397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,646
<DEPOSITS>                                      34,560
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,597
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                136
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  63,646
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,330
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  896
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,236
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 752
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,435
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              801
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        9
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    357
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         357
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       227
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .072
<LOANS-NON>                                        372
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   398
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  397
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               397
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Jules L. FEDERMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, a Municipal corporation; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-56005.

D.C. No. CV-01-07851-MMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 14, 2003.

*372Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and Ap*372pellant’s request for oral argument is denied. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jules L. Federman appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U. S.C. § 1983 action against judges, law firms, attorneys, and a legal malpractice insurer for their roles in prior state court actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo both dismissal based on judicial immunity, *see Harvey v. Waldron,*210 F.3d 1008, 1011 (9th Cir.2000), and dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under *Rooker-Feldman, see Canatella v. State of California,*304 F.3d 843, 849 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Federman’s claim alleging that state court judges conspired to rule against him, because such claims are barred by judicial immunity. *See Moore v. Brewster,*96 F.3d 1240, 1244 (9th Cir.1996).

The district court properly dismissed Federman’s remaining claims because under *Rooker-Feldman*the district court lacked jurisdiction. *See Doe & Assoc. v. Napolitano,*252 F.3d 1026, 1030 (9th Cir. 2001).

The request of Appellees Merenbach, Moes, Archibald *&*Spray LLP, and Tort Associates for judicial notice, received by this Court on November 5, 2002, is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### NORTON et al. v. CRESCENT CITY ICE MFG. CO., Inc.*

No. 14130.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 13, 1933.

I. E. Uzzo and James J. Landry, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Pomes & McCabe, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

*

Rehearing denied April 10, 1933.

JANVIER, Judge.

In this suit plaintiffs, sole survivors of William S. Norton, seek recovery for the direct losses sustained by them in the death of their father, William S. Norton, who died as the result of an accident, liability for which rests upon defendant. They are met with a “plea in bar or res j.udieata” based on the fact that in another suit, to which we shall now refer, they were enjoined from attempting to assert their claims for these losses.

In the matter of Roy J. Norton et al. v. Crescent City Ice Manufacturing Co., Inc., 146 So. 753, decided by us this day, these same plaintiffs presented their claim for the transmitted rights of the said William ;S. Norton to recover for such suffering, mental anguish, etc., as he might have recovered for had he lived, and in that suit we rendered a decree remanding the matter to the civil district court to the end that plaintiffs might be afforded an opportunity to assert in the same suit their claims for their direct losses resulting from the death; in other words, the claims which they attempt to assert in this suit.

Since the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in Reed v. Warren, 172 La. 1082, 136 So. 59, held that all claims must be presented in the same suit, we feel that that course must be followed here, and that, therefore, the suit now before us should be dismissed as in case of nonsuit and plaintiffs should, in that other litigation, to wit, Roy J. Norton et al. v. Crescent City Ice Mfg. Co., Inc., assert the claims which they have here presented.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from, sustaining the plea in bar or plea of res judicata, •be annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that the said plea in bar or plea of res judicata be and it is overruled, and that plaintiffs’ suit be and it is dismissed, at their eost as in case of nonsuit.

Reversed.
exv10w2w1



 





Exhibit 10.2.1




APPENDIX D




Section 6.7(a)(i) — List of Investment Funds Available Under the Plan





	D.1	 	 The following Investment Funds are presently available under the Plan:
	 
	1.	 	Balanced I Fund — Wellington
	 
	2.	 	Guaranteed Income Fund
	 
	3.	 	Invesco Dynamics Account
	 
	4.	 	Janus Advisor Balanced Account
	 
	5.	 	Janus Worldwide Account
	 
	6.	 	Kaydon Corporation Stock (the “Stock Account”)
	 
	7.	 	Large Cap Growth/Goldman Sachs Fund
	 
	8.	 	Large Cap Value/John A. Levin & Co. Fund
	 
	9.	 	Mid Cap Growth/Artisan Partners
	 
	10.	 	Mid Cap Value Fund — Wellington
	 
	11.	 	Retirement 2010 Fund
	 
	12.	 	Retirement 2020 Fund
	 
	13.	 	Retirement 2030 Fund
	 
	14.	 	Retirement 2040 Fund
	 
	15.	 	Retirement Goal Income Fund
	 
	16.	 	Small Cap Growth/TimesSquare Fund
	 
	17.	 	Small Cap Value/TCW Fund
	 
	18.	 	Templeton Foreign Account
	 
	19.	 	TimesSquare High Grade Bond Fund




 









 









     Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, no funds may be
transferred from any other Fund into the CIGNA Guaranteed Short Term Account
and no funds may be transferred from to CIGNA Guaranteed Short Term Account in
the CIGNA Actively Managed Fixed Fund without first having been transferred
into one or more other Funds for at least ninety (90 days.




	D.2	 	The Parkstone Intermediate Government Obligations Fund (the “Government
Obligations Fund”) was previously available, but was not available for
additional allocations after December 31, 1993. That Investment Fund was
available for additional allocations until December 31, 1993 and continued
to be available for existing allocations to the Option on December 31,
1993 until March 31, 1994.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil No. 08-94-PB 

)

Christie West, )

Defendant, )

)

and )

)

Granite State Credit Union, )

Garnishee. )

PROPOSED ORDER TO QUASH 

WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT

On March 25, 2011, a Writ of Continuing Garnishment and 

Clerk's Notice of Continuing Garnishment were issued in the abovecaptioned action by James R. Starr, Clerk, United States District

Court. In accordance with the terms of the Writ of Continuing

Garnishment, on March 30, 2011, accounts in the name of Christie

West, held by Granite State Credit Union, were levied on by the

United States of America. Copies of the Application, Clerk's

Notice and Writ of Continuing Garnishment were sent to defendant,

Christie West, by certified mail on March 30, 2011.

Due to the minute balance in the account, the United States

does not request a turnover of these funds. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that funds in the amount of $6.77, seized on

March 30, 2011, from accounts in the name of Christie West, which

are in the possession, custody or control of Granite State Credit

Union, be released back to the defendant, Christie West, and it is 

Case 1:08-cv-00094-PB Document 16 Filed 04/20/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that the Writ of Continuing Garnishment issued on

March 25, 2011, to Granite State Credit Union, is hereby quashed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 _________________________ 

 U.S. District Court Judge

DATED:

cc: Michael T. McCormack, AUSA

 Christie West, pro se

 Granite State Credit Union

Case 1:08-cv-00094-PB Document 16 Filed 04/20/11 Page 2 of 2
XXXXXXXXXX

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 1 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 2 of 10

September 27 a10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 3 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 4 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 5 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 6 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 7 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 8 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 9 of 10

Case 1:08-cv-00312-JL   Document 130   Filed 05/13/11   Page 10 of 10

- Untitled
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         17492
<SECURITIES>                                   139400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2038
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    110138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               269068
<PP&E>                                         182771
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109979
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1232
<OTHER-SE>                                     252638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363579
<SALES>                                        615975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               615975
<CGS>                                          398282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               150897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8787)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                52479
<INCOME-TAX>                                   19155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            33324
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   33324
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.53


</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1630

To encourage the International Monetary Fund to fully implement

transparency and efficiency policies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. ARMEY) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To encourage the International Monetary Fund to fully

implement transparency and efficiency policies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IMF Transparency and

5 Efficiency Enforcement Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO MAKE LOANS TO

7 THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND.

8 Section 17(a) of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act

9 (22 U.S.C. 280e–z(a)) is amended by adding at the end

10 the following: ‘‘A loan under the authority granted in this
2

•HR 1630 IH

1 subsection may be made only within 1 year after the Sec2 retary of the Treasury and the Chairman of the Board

3 of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, after con4 sultation with the Comptroller General of the United

5 States, have jointly provided to the Committees on Appro6 priations, Foreign Relations, and Banking, Housing, and

7 Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committees on Ap8 propriations and Banking and Financial Services of the

9 House of Representatives a written certification that the

10 Fund has implemented fully the policies described in sec11 tion 601 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing,

12 and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1999 (as con13 tained in section 101(d) of Division A of the Omnibus

14 Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropria15 tions Act, 1999), except that if, in each of the preceding

16 4 years, such a certification has been so provided, and a

17 joint resolution approving the certification has not been

18 enacted into law pursuant to this sentence at any time

19 during such 4 preceding years, then such a loan may not

20 be made within 1 year after the provision of the certifi21 cation unless, during such year, a joint resolution approv22 ing the certification is enacted into law.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen L. Bartlett

v. Civil No. 08-cv-358-JL

Mutual Pharmaceutical

Company, Inc.

SUMMARY ORDER

Mutual has moved under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) to stay the

execution of this court’s judgment (doc. no. 389) and any

proceedings to enforce it pending the disposition of Mutual’s

anticipated post-trial motions. The motion is granted on an

interim basis. On or before October 8, 2010, Mutual shall show

cause in writing for a further extension of the stay. 

Specifically, Mutual shall demonstrate that it has taken

appropriate steps to provide for Bartlett’s security, including

the posting of a supersedeas bond or other step(s) that provide

security equivalent to that of a supersedeas bond. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 62(b) (stay must be “[o]n appropriate terms for the

opposing party’s security); Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349, 359

n. 8 (1996) (“The district court may only stay execution of the

judgment pending the disposition of certain post-trial motions 

. . . if the court provides for the security of the judgment

creditor”).

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 393 Filed 10/01/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 1, 2010

cc: Keith M. Jensen, Esq.

Bryan Ballew, Esq.

Patrick J. O’Neal, Esq.

Eric Roberson, Esq.

Christine M. Craig, Esq.

Timothy P. Beaupre, Esq.

Joseph P. Thomas, Esq.

Paul J. Cosgrove, Esq.

Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Esq.

Linda E. Maichl, Esq.

Stephen J. Judge, Esq.

Pierre A. Chabot, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 393 Filed 10/01/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 316]


Delegation From the Secretary of Certain Certification Functions 
in Maritime Law Enforcement to the Assistant Secretary for 
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State, 
including the authority of section 1 of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the 
Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement 
Affairs, the certification functions of 46 U.S.C. 70502(d)(2) and 18 
U.S.C. 2237(d).
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary or the 
Deputy Secretary may exercise any function or authority covered by this 
delegation. The functions delegated herein may be re-delegated.
    Any reference in this delegation of authority to any act, order, 
determination, delegation of authority, regulation, or procedure shall 
be deemed to be a reference to such act, order, determination, 
delegation of authority, regulation or procedure as amended from time 
to time.
    Delegation of Authority Number 164, dated May 23, 1987, is hereby 
superseded.
    This Delegation of Authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: September 2, 2008.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-22409 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-P