alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emory B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                                                                                         
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       
|                        |  |  | 
|DATE: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Emory B. Lewis    
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Emory B. Lewis, President and C.E.O. (Principal
Executive Officer)                      
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                       
|                        |  |  | 
|DATE: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Elaine S. Kendrick
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Elaine S. Kendrick, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1814 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1814

  To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Metacomet-
   Monadnock-Sunapee-Mattabesett Trail extending through western New 
Hampshire, western Massachusetts, and central Connecticut for study for 
           potential addition to the National Trails System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2001

 Mr. Olver (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mrs. 
 Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Bass, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, and Mr. 
   Maloney of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Metacomet-
   Monadnock-Sunapee-Mattabesett Trail extending through western New 
Hampshire, western Massachusetts, and central Connecticut for study for 
           potential addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Metacomet-Monadnock-Sunapee-
Mattabesett Trail Study Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METACOMET-MONADNOCK-SUNAPEE-MATTABESETT TRAIL 
              FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS 
              SYSTEM.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(____) Metacomet-Monadnock-Sunapee-Mattabesett Trail.--The 
Metacomet-Monadnock-Sunapee-Mattabesett Trail, a system of trails and 
potential trails extending southward approximately 260 miles from the 
Appalachian National Scenic Trail in western New Hampshire, connecting 
with Mount Sunapee on the Monadnock-Sunapee Greenway Trail, through 
western Massachusetts on the Metacomet-Monadnock Trail, across central 
Connecticut on the Metacomet Trail and the Mattabesett Trail, and 
ending at Long Island Sound.''.

SEC. 3. EXPEDITED REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Notwithstanding the fourth sentence of section 5(b) of the National 
Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(b)), the Secretary of the Interior 
shall submit the study required by the amendment made by section 2 to 
Congress not later than two years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 TRANSCRYPT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
                 (in thousands, except share and per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                        --------------------------------------------
                                                           MARCH 31, 2001          MARCH 31, 2000
                                                        ---------------------    -------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                      <C>
Net income (loss)                                              $       (798)           $     (3,251)
                                                        =====================    ===================

<CAPTION>
                                                        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC
<S>                                                     <C>                      <C>
Weighted average common shares  - Basic                           14,423,913             12,956,871
                                                        =====================    ===================
Net income (loss) per share - Basic                            $       (0.06)          $      (0.25)
                                                        =====================    ===================

<CAPTION>
                                                        NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - DILUTED
<S>                                                     <C>                      <C>
Shares used in this computation:
  Weighted average common shares  - Basic                         14,423,913             12,956,871
  Dilutive effect of shares under employee
  stock plans                                                              -                      -
                                                        ---------------------    -------------------
  Weighted average common shares - Diluted                        14,423,913             12,956,871
                                                        =====================    ===================

Net income (loss) per share - Diluted                          $      (0.06)           $      (0.25)
                                                        =====================    ===================
</TABLE>


                                                      Page 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Civil No. 07-CR-227-SM

Sylvia Casto

O R D E R

Even with a third party custodian, defendant is not entitled

to bail. Defendant’s unborn child and defendant are at severe

risk of endangerment by her cocaine habit. The motion is denied.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: January 31, 2008

cc: Bjorn R. Lange, Esq.

William E. Morse, Esq.

Case 1:07-cr-00227-SM Document 13 Filed 01/31/08 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32**

 

ISONICSCORPORATION

 

Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350Principal Executive Officer

 

To my knowledge: thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005,containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; andthe information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IsonicsCorporation for the periods presented.

 

 

September 13, 2005

 

 
| /s/ James E. Alexander              |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| James E. Alexander, Chief Executive |
| Officer                             |

 

Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

PrincipalFinancial Officer

 

To my knowledge: thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005,containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; andthe information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IsonicsCorporation for the periods presented.

 

 

September 13, 2005

 

 
| /s/ John Sakys                       |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| John  Sakys, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, November 4-8, Percent except as noted

Loan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rate

Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 689,089 15,854 121,043 214,961 235,040 54,860 36,03

Number of loans 15,682 308 1,512 6,166 5,468 978 52

Weighted average maturity (months)1 10.73 11.54 7.57 10.13 13.17 5.04 21.2

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 1.76 4.66 2.40 1.47 1.88 .02 1.1

Weighted average risk rating3 3.30 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.aWeighted average interest rate 4 4.74 4.48 4.21 4.72 4.98 5.24 4.0 Standard error5 .26 .20 .49 .39 .19 .45 .5

 Interquartile range6

 75th percentile 5.39 4.86 4.60 5.39 5.48 5.90 4.5

 25th percentile 3.30 3.56 3.30 3.30 4.32 4.33 3.4

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.53 5.68 3.98 5.32 4.55 4.51 5.2

 Other livestock 4.44 3.65 5.42 4.16 4.51 4.22 5.1

 Other current operating expenses7 5.36 4.73 6.10 5.15 5.34 5.85 3.9

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.28 8.40 6.23 6.21 6.03 n.a. 5.8

 Farm real estate 5.12 3.71 6.85 4.81 5.42 7.50 4.3

 Other8 4.17 4.82 3.37 4.12 4.80 4.48 3.9

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 90.75 45.82 87.25 88.23 95.43 99.78 98.0

 Under commitment 93.30 65.88 95.94 93.97 91.13 99.72 95.0

 Callable 12.71 50.38 13.79 12.04 11.51 1.03 1.0

 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.82 1.10 21.41 7.59 9.74 3.40 .2

 Other livestock 10.67 17.07 3.80 12.99 13.63 7.26 .3

 Other current operating expenses7 37.50 49.38 18.86 44.83 38.11 56.83 17.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 1.41 2.78 2.32 1.83 .94 .05 .8

 Farm real estate 3.09 18.44 1.50 1.26 4.63 .01 7.5

 Other8 37.51 11.23 52.11 31.50 32.95 32.50 74.2

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 5.40 5.85 3.07 3.96 7.46 2.10 13.7

 Other 84.12 93.03 93.58 83.35 80.28 91.27 69.9

 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54880-54881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11436]


Vermont Disaster <greek-i>VT-00010.

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-
1790-DR), dated 09/12/2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 07/21/2008 through 08/12/2008.
    Effective Date: 09/12/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/12/2008.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/12/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/12/2008, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties:

[[Page 54881]]

    Addison, Caledonia, Essex, Lamoille, Orange, Washington, Windsor.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Vermont: Bennington, Chittenden, Franklin, Orleans, Rutland, 
Windham.
    New Hampshire: Coos, Grafton, Sullivan.
    New York: Essex, Washington.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for 
economic injury is 11436.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-22177 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gary Johnson

v. Case No. 07-cv-161-PB

Angela Poulin, et l.

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 15, 2008, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 6, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Gary Johnson, Pro se

Danielle Pacik, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00161-PB Document 60 Filed 02/06/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Pure Barnyard, Inc. 

v. Civil No. 08-cv-501-JL 

Organic Laboratories, Inc. 

O R D E R 

TO: Defendant, Organic Laboratories, Inc. And Results Capital Group, Inc. 

Court records indicate the withdrawal of Cynthia Sullivan, Esq., James Finnigan, Esq., 

and Jeffrey Loeb, Esq. as your counsel. 

An appearance by new counsel of record must be filed by November 10, 2009. See 

Local Rule 83.6(c) and (d). If no new appearance is received by the time specified, the file 

will be referred to the clerk for entry of the default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). 

In light of this Order, the Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for October 26, 

2009 is herewith rescheduled to Tuesday, November 24, 2009 at 11 AM. If the parties wish 

to file a Revised Discovery Plan, the revised plan shall be filed by November 19, 2009. 

By the Court, 

October 21, 2009 

Joseph N. Laplante 

United States District Judge 

cc: William Gannon, Esq. 

Mark Weaver, Esq. 

Case 1:08-cv-00501-JL Document 27 Filed 10/21/09 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Larry J. Waisanen, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lafarge North America
Inc.; Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. March 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Larry J. Waisanen
Larry J. Waisanen
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### John Kingston, Respondent, v Michael Breslin et al., Appellants.

[811 NYS2d 715]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is a shareholder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered October 29, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that the plaintiff is a 15% owner of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted, the order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 27, 2004, denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is modified accordingly, and it is declared that the plaintiff is not a shareholder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates.

The alleged oral agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant Michael Breslin, that the plaintiff was a 15% share*658holder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates, is not enforceable, since it violated UCC 8-319, the securities statute of frauds, which was in effect at all relevant times (see *Hart v Windjammer Barefoot Cruises,*220 AD2d 252 [1995]; *Dillon v Peretti,*176 AD2d 497 [1991]). The letters dated October 5, 1998, and March 25, 1999, respectively, did not give the plaintiff enforceable rights as claimed due to the failure to state, inter alia, the price of the shares to which the plaintiff purports to be entitled *(see*UCC 8-319; *Baytree Assoc. v Forster,*240 AD2d 305 [1997]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are either without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     BD
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,563
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,307
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            1,106
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            42,328
<PP&E>                                         1,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 88,484
<SHORT-TERM>                                   3,513
<PAYABLES>                                     76,792
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             141
<LONG-TERM>                                    614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   88,484
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              5,131
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           1,757
<COMMISSIONS>                                  6,240
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  584
<FEE-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             976
<COMPENSATION>                                 10,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (672)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (672)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.31)


</TABLE>