alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nelson Welshman

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00302-JL

Eric M. Brown, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

October 17, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00302-JL Document 5 Filed 10/07/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 7, 2008

cc: Michael S. Bowser, Jr., Esq.

Corey M. Belobrow, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00302-JL Document 5 Filed 10/07/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSCRYPT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,273
<INVENTORY>                                      3,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,818
<PP&E>                                           3,280
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,475
<SALES>                                         11,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,360
<CGS>                                            9,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (582)<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
<FN>
<F1>Interest expense is net of $714 of interest and other income less $132 of
interest expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11



Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Unit

For the Periods



|                                             |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | --------- | - | -------------------------------------- | - | --------- | -
|                                             |  | January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005 |           |   | January 1, 2004 through March 31, 2004 |  
|                                             |  | (unaudited)                            |           |   | (unaudited)                            |  
|Net income (Loss)                            |  | $                                      | (26,976   | ) |                                        | $ | (28,527   | )
|                                             |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |   |           |  
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                        | 4,222,870 |   |                                        |   | 4,222,870 |  
|                                             |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |   |           |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                      | (0.01     | ) |                                        | $ | (0.01     | )
|                                             |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |   |           |
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1610

To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to make leaf tobacco

an eligible commodity for the Market Access Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 1993 to

make leaf tobacco an eligible commodity for the Market

Access Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 1302(b)(3) of the Agricultural Reconciliation

4 Act of 1993 (7 U.S.C. 5623 note) is amended by inserting

5 ‘‘, other than leaf tobacco’’ after ‘‘tobacco’’.

Æ
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1993...... 7.5 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.7 6.2 9.0 8.7 8.3 6.9 1994...... 7.8 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.6 7.0 9.1 8.8 8.6 7.3 1995...... 9.5 10.1 10.2 10.0 10.3 8.8 10.6 10.5 10.3 9.0 1996...... 8.4 8.8 9.5 8.6 9.7 8.0 10.2 10.1 9.8 7.8 1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2002: Q1... 6.3 6.5 5.6 6.8 6.7 5.2 7.6 7.2 6.7 5.7  Q2... 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.4 7.1 5.3 7.2 6.9 6.4 5.6  Q3... 5.7 6.3 6.1 6.0 6.3 4.7 7.3 7.0 6.5 4.9  Q4... 5.5 5.6 5.4 6.2 7.2 4.2 7.1 6.7 6.2 4.8 2003: Q1... 5.6 5.3 5.2 6.0 6.2 4.8 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.2  Q2... 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.4 6.2 4.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 5.4  Q3... 5.2 4.8 5.6 5.4 6.0 4.4 6.5 6.2 5.6 4.6  Q4... 5.0 4.7 5.4 5.2 5.6 4.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 4.2 2004: Q1... 5.3 5.1 5.9 5.6 5.5 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.0  Q2... 5.2 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.4 4.7 6.5 6.2 5.5 4.7  Q3... 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.8 5.6 5.0 6.6 6.5 5.9 5.1  Q4... 5.5 5.5 5.2 6.0 5.5 4.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 5.1 2005: Q1... 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.9 5.7 7.3 6.9 6.9 6.4  Q2... 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.0 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q3... 6.7 6.9 6.8 7.1 6.9 5.8 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.3  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41101 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OMAR VASQUEZ, also known as Agustin Lara-Gomez, also known as Omar Vasquez-Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(5:05-CR-2522-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________ Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Omar Vasquez appeals his guilty plea conviction and 41-months sentence for illegally reentering the United States after having been previously deported. Vasquez claims the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i),-2-

based upon a determination that his Texas conviction for delivery of a controlled substance was a drug trafficking offense. Pursuant to our decision in United States v. Gonzales, No. 05- 41221, 2007 WL 1063993, at *1 (5th Cir. 7 Mar. 2007), the district court did err. When a district court misapplies the advisory Guidelines, remand is appropriate unless this court concludes, “on the record as a whole, that the error was harmless, i.e., that the
error did not affect the district court’s selection of the sentence imposed”. U

nited States v. Davis, 478 F.3d 266, 273 ( 5th Cir. 2007) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Here, any error was harmless because the court stated that, even if it had miscalculated the Guidelines, it would have imposed the same sentence. See id. Vasquez also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). He concedes his constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998) and raises it here only to preserve it for further review. AFFIRMED
Order entered April 14, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00375 - CV IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E .P., Appellant

On Appeal from the Probate Court No . 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MED - 20 - 80112

ORDER Befor e the Court is appellant’s April 10, 2020 motion to extend time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 30, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS , III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Francisco Padua MASCARDO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70403. Agency [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*716Submitted July 8, 2003.*

Decided July 31, 2003.

Before KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Francisco Padua Mascardo, a citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision, which found him to be removable from the United States and denied his request for cancellation of removal. We deny the petition in part and dismiss it in part.

Mascardo was removable if he was convicted of a crime of domestic violence against a person protected from his acts under state law. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). He was convicted of battery upon a person with whom he had a dating relationship. *See*Cal.Penal Code § 243(e)(1). Battery is a crime of violence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 16; Cal.Penal Code § 242; *Gunnell v. Metrocolor Labs., Inc.,*92 Cal. App.4th 710, 725, 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 195, 206 (2001). His violence was directed against a person whom California protects under its domestic violence laws. *See*Cal.Penal Code § 243(e)(1) *&*(10); *see also*Cal.Penal Code § 13700(b)); Cal.Penal Code § 12028.5(a)(2)(C); Cal. Fam.Code § 6211(c). Thus, the BIA did not err when it found him to be removable.

Mascardo also asks us to review the BIA’s exercise of its discretion to deny him cancellation of removal. We have no jurisdiction so to do. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 891 (9th Cir.2003); *Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002). Although he argues that the BIA violated his right to due process, we lack jurisdiction to consider that claim because it is not colorable. *See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001); *Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Thus, we dismiss that claim.

Petition DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                      OLYMPIC CASCADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION


         Pursuant to Section 102 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation, a corporation organized under
and existing by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        1.  The first sentence of the Fourth  paragraph of the  Certificate of
Incorporation  is hereby amended as follows:

            "The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation
            shall have authority to issue is 60,000,000 shares of common stock,
            par value $0.02 per share (the "Common Stock") and 100,000 shares of
            preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Preferred Stock").
            "

       2.    The  foregoing  amendment  was  effected  pursuant to a  resolution
of the Board of Directors of said corporation.

       3.    The foregoing  amendment  was  approved  by  a  majority  vote  of
stockholders of said corporation.

Dated: March 13, 2002




                                           Mark Goldwasser
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert H. Daskal, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




                                             /s/ Robert H. Daskal
                                             Robert H. Daskal
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 12, 2003



                                       28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jacqueline Lemieux, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-00083-JL

Town of Jaffrey, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

April 25, 2008.

The Discovery Plan is approved as submitted.

By agreement of the parties, the following affirmative

defenses are stricken without prejudice:

(1) release and waiver; and

(2) res judicata and collateral estoppel.

The defendant will amend ¶ 17 of its Answer to clearly

indicate its position with respect to the allegation in ¶ 17 of

the Complaint. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

April 25, 2008

cc: Jason R. L. Major, Esq.

Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00083-JL Document 7 Filed 04/25/08 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Matthew Brown

Criminal No . 09-cr-23-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

13) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : May 11, 200 9

cc : Jessica Brown, Esq .

Robert Veiga, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00023-JD Document 14 Filed 05/11/09 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of November 1, 2008 Meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date of the November 1, 2008 meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission. 

# DATES:

The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on Saturday, November 1, 2008 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. (Eastern). The Commission will meet jointly with the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force. 

*Location:*                         The meeting will be held at the Somerset County Courthouse, Court Room #1, located at 111 E. Union Street, Somerset, PA 15501.                     

*Agenda:*

The November 1, 2008 joint Commission and Task Force meeting will consist of 

1. Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance. 

2. Review and Approval of Commission Minutes from August 2, 2008. 

3. Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and National Park Service. Comments from the public will be received after each report and/or at the end of the meeting. 

4. Old Business. 

5. New Business. 

6. Public Comments. 

7. Closing Remarks. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501, 814.443.4557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. Address all statements to: Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501. 

Dated: September 8, 2008. 

Joanne M. Hanley, 

Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial. 

[FR Doc. E8-22924 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-25-P
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1985...... 12 21 17 18 68

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 n.a. n.a. 0 n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1995: Q3... 100 * * 5.00 15.00 8.00 30.00 30.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 * * .01 * 1996: Q3... 100 * .01 15.00 18.00 25.00 22.00 15.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1997: Q3... 100 * .01 5.00 3.00 33.00 33.00 17.00 8.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1998: Q3... 100 * .01 8.00 10.00 30.00 29.00 16.00 6.00 .01 .01 * * .01 * 1999: Q3... 100 * 2.00 4.00 10.00 35.00 32.00 12.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2000: Q3... 100 .01 .01 1.00 1.00 16.00 30.00 28.00 19.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 2001: Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * * 2002: Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * * 2003: Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * * 2004: Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * * 2005: Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * * 2006: Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.