alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1937 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1937

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to engage in certain 
    feasibility studies of water resource projects in the State of 
                              Washington.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pacific Northwest Feasibility 
Studies Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may engage in the 
following feasibility studies:
            (1) The Tulalip Tribes Water Quality Feasibility Study, to 
        identify ways to meet future domestic and commercial water 
        distribution needs of the Tulalip Indian Reservation on the 
        Eastern Shore of Puget Sound, Washington.
            (2) The Lower Elwha Klallam Rural Water Supply Feasibility 
        Study, to identify additional rural water supply sources for 
        the Lower Elwha Indian Reservation on the Olympic Peninsula, 
        Washington.
            (3) The Makah Community Water Source Project Feasibility 
        Study, to identify ways to meet the current and future domestic 
        and commercial water supply and distribution needs of the Makah 
        Indian Tribe on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington.
    (b) Public Availability of Results.--The Secretary of the Interior 
shall make available to the public, upon request, the results of each 
feasibility study authorized under subsection (a), and shall promptly 
publish in the Federal Register a notice of the availability of those 
results.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 10, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 FRANK TYLER,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 32,190

5 ARMANDO VILLEGAS

6 and USAA,

7 Defendants-Appellees.

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

9 Clay Campbell, District Judge

10 Frank Tyler

11 Albuquerque, NM

12 Pro Se Appellant

13 Civerolo, Gralow, Hill & Curtis

14 Megan D. Hill

15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellees
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 KENNEDY, Judge.

3 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

5 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

6 DISMISSED.

7 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 _______________________________

9 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 ___________________________

12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

13 ___________________________

14 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2001: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1992...... 82 14 20 29 18 .237 .039 .062 .083 .050

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... n.a. 34 35 48 n.a. n.a. .074 .080 .108 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jermaine Jackson, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 654]

*809Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Carroll, J.), rendered July 2, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the arresting detective’s bolstering testimony about the complainant’s identification of the defendant from a lineup was improper *(see*CPL 470.05; *People v West,*56 NY2d 662 [1982]; *People v Martinez,*1 AD3d 611 [2003]).

The defendant correctly observes that the redirect questioning about the prior identification of the defendant from a photo array went beyond what was necessary to correct any misapprehension which may have been caused by the defense counsel’s cross-examination *(see People v Melendez,*55 NY2d 445, 452 [1982]; *People v Johnson,*296 AD2d 422 [2002]). Furthermore, the photo array should not have been admitted into evidence *(see People v Wilson,*195 AD2d 493, 494 [1993]). This claim, contrary to the People’s contention, was preserved for appellate review, because the defense counsel strenuously objected to the proposed questioning during the colloquy prior to redirect, and the court expressly denied the objection *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]).

Nevertheless, this error in allowing testimony about the photo array on redirect and admitting the photo array into evidence at trial was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, which precluded any significant probability that the jury would have acquitted the defendant in the absence of the error *(see People v Johnson,*57 NY2d 969, 970 [1982]; *People v White,*210 AD2d 271 [1994]).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 708 [1988]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 146-147 [1981]; *People v Thomas,*276 AD2d 570 [2000]; *People v Maupin,*268 AD2d 488, 489 [2000]; *People v Mitchell,*208 AD2d 959 [1994]; *People v Ruscitti,*163 AD2d 431, 432 [1990]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of
AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV LP (the
“Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date:
May 15, 2008




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
____________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2           Q3            Q4           Total
____________________________________________________________________________________

1983......    |             1           1             2             3              7
1984......    |             3           7            10            12             32
1985......    |            12          21            17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14            21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19            12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6            12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7             5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5             6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2             3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1             1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2             2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0             0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2             0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0             0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0             1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0             0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0             0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1             0             0              1
2004......    |             0           1          n.a.          n.a.           n.a.
____________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Bruce C. Edwards, President and Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: |  | August 1, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE C. EDWARDS                 
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Bruce C. Edwards                     
|      |  |                | 
|      |  |                |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |                | 
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1995...... 100.0 83.4 14.0 2.1 .3 .1 .1

1996...... 100.0 81.9 15.4 2.3 .2 .1 .1

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.5 15.8 3.2 .3 ... .1

 Q3... 100.0 81.8 15.2 2.7 .2 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998: Q1... 100.0 80.6 16.3 2.8 .1 .1 .1

 Q2... 100.0 80.8 15.9 2.9 .3 .1 .0

 Q3... 100.0 80.3 16.2 3.1 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999: Q1... 100.0 77.2 17.8 4.5 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 78.7 16.9 3.8 .6 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 80.4 15.9 3.4 .3 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
Exhibit 32



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Coleman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John L. ColemanJohn L. Coleman, President and C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Elaine S. KendrickElaine S. Kendrick, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




November 12, 2004
#### David Bregman, Appellant, v Douglas Finn, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[807 NYS2d 879]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated August 16, 2004, as denied that branch of his motion which was to vacate so much of a judgment of the same court dated January 27, 2003, as, upon a prior order of the same court dated December 16, 2002, inter alia, granting the motion of the defendant Douglas Finn pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint upon his failure to oppose the motion, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Douglas Finn.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to show the existence of a meritorious claim with respect to the defendant Douglas Finn *(see Yushavayev v*Kopelman, 307 AD2d 996 [2003]; *McKay v H.I.P. of Greater N.Y.,*163 AD2d 280 [1990]; *Canter v Mulnick,*93 AD2d 751 [1983], *affd*60 NY2d 689 [1983]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to vacate so much of the judgment as, upon an order granting Finn’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint upon the plaintiffs failure to oppose the motion, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against Finn.

*745In light of this determination, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006...... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

2008...... 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6 2.1 1.0 1.2 .2 1.0

2000: Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .7 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

2008: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .3 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6

 Q2... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .8 .9 .2 .7

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 1.6 .6 1.0 .1 .8

 Q4... 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6 2.1 1.0 1.2 .2 1.0

2009: Q1... 1.8 .8 1.0 .1 .8 2.8 1.3 1.5 .2 1.3

 Q2... 1.7 .5 1.2 .2 1.0 2.7 .8 1.8 .3 1.5

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
|Structure Data for U.S. Banking Offices of Foreign Entities

Structure and Share | 
About




March 2003


By Country
  By Type
  ASCIIHome | 
Banking Information and RegulationAccessibility | 
Contact us
Last update: June 30, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------