alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1954

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

An Act

To extend the authorities of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 until 2006,

and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ILSA Extension Act of 2001’’.

SEC. 2. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO LIBYA.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(b)(2) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; 110 Stat. 1543) is amended

by striking ‘‘$40,000,000’’ each place it appears and inserting

‘‘$20,000,000’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) shall apply to investments made on or after June 13, 2001.

SEC. 3. REPORTS REQUIRED.

Section 10 of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public

Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended—

(1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and

(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

‘‘(b) REPORT ON EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIONS UNDER THIS ACT.—

Not earlier than 24 months, and not later than 30 months, after

the date of the enactment of the ILSA Extension Act of 2001,

the President shall transmit to Congress a report that describes—

‘‘(1) the extent to which actions relating to trade taken

pursuant to this Act—

‘‘(A) have been effective in achieving the objectives

of section 3 and any other foreign policy or national security

objectives of the United States with respect to Iran and

Libya; and

‘‘(B) have affected humanitarian interests in Iran and

Libya, the country in which the sanctioned person is

located, or in other countries; and

‘‘(2) the impact of actions relating to trade taken pursuant

to this Act on other national security, economic, and foreign

policy interests of the United States, including relations with

countries friendly to the United States, and on the United

States economy.

The President may include in the report the President’s recommendation on whether or not this Act should be terminated

or modified.’’.
H. R. 1954—2

SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF IRAN AND LIBYA SANCTIONS ACT OF 1996.

Section 13(b) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996

(Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’.

SEC. 5. REVISED DEFINITION OF INVESTMENT.

Section 14(9) of the Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996

(50 U.S.C. 1701 note; 110 Stat. 1549) is amended by adding at

the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of this paragraph,

an amendment or other modification that is made, on or after

June 13, 2001, to an agreement or contract shall be treated as

the entry of an agreement or contract.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided: January 19, 2016

S16Y0126. IN THE MATTER OF NICHOLAS PAGANO.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary

discipline filed by Nicholas Pagano (StateBar No. 558935) prior to the issuance

of a formal complaint. Pagano seeks a Review Panel reprimand for conduct

involving the abandonment of one client’s matter and the StateBar recommends

that the Court accept Pagano’s petition.

With regard to this matter, Pagano, who has been a member of the State

Bar since 1986, admits that in 2008 a client hired him to represent her in a

personal injury action; that he filed suit on the client’s behalf in July 2008; that

although he did some initial work on the client’s case, he eventually stopped

communicating with her; that he failed to appear at two separate calendar calls

relating to the case; that at the second calendar call, the judge dismissed the

client’s case for want of prosecution; and that he did not tell the client the

dismissal resulted from his failure to appear. Pagano admits that by his actions,
he violated Rules 1.3 and 1.4 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see

Bar Rule 4-102 (d). The maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.3 is

disbarment, while the maximum penalty for a violation of Rule 1.4 is a public

reprimand.

In mitigation, we note that Pagano is remorseful; that he did not act with

a dishonest or selfish motive; that he has been hampered by significant eye and

vision problems in recent years; and that he displayed a cooperative attitude

toward the disciplinary proceedings. In aggravation, we note that Pagano

received an Investigative Panel reprimand in 1992 and a Formal Letter of

Admonition in 2002 and that he admits that he had “no excuse or reason” for his

conduct in this matter. 

The State Bar responded to the petition, asserting that a reprimand is the

appropriate sanction in this matter, see In the Matter of King, 289 Ga. 457 (712

SE2d 70) (2011) (Review Panel reprimand resolving one disciplinary case

arising from abandonment of a civil matter; prior Investigative Panel

reprimand); In the Matter of Shapiro, 288 Ga. 455, 704 SE2d 784 (2011)

(Review Panel reprimand resolving two disciplinary cases; prior Investigative

Panel reprimand and two Formal Letters of Admonition), and recommending

2
that the Court accept the petition. 

Having reviewed the record we agree that a Review Panel reprimand is an

appropriate sanction in this matter. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that

Pagano receive a Review Panel reprimand in accordance with Bar Rules 4-102

(b) (4) and 4-220 for his admitted violations of Rules 1.3 and 1.4.

Petition for voluntary discipline accepted. Review Panel reprimand.

All the Justices concur. 

3
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02260-WYD-MJW

EUGENE DURAN,

Applicant,

v.

RAY TIMME, Warden CTCF, and

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,

Respondents.

FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Denying

28 U.S.C. § 2254 Application, filed on September 16, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y.

Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if

fully set forth, it is

ORDERED that the habeas corpus application is DENIED, and the action is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further

ORDERED that each party shall bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. It is

further

ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has

not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is further

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

Case 1:11-cv-02260-WYD Document 55 Filed 09/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 16th day of September, 2013.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: s/ Edward P. Butler 

Edward P. Butler,

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02260-WYD Document 55 Filed 09/16/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Ch ief District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOHN RICHARD VARNER, Defendant - Appellant. No. 10-50071 D.C. No. 5:07-cr-00028-VAP-2
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 7, 2013 ** Pasadena, California Before: THOMAS and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BEISTLINE, Chief District Judge. *** 

# FILED
MAR 13 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSDefendant-Appellant John Varner was convicted on four counts of conspiracy and tax fraud. Varner appeal s his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury an accomplice instruction sua sponte and that counsel’s failure to request the instru ction constituted ineffective assistance. A district court’s failure to give a jury instruction sua sponte is reviewed for plain error. United States v. Guthrie , 931 F.2d 564, 567 (9th Cir. 1991). Because we have held that “where an accomplice in struction is not requested, it is not plain error not to give one sua sponte,” United States v. Gere , 662 F.2d 1291, 1295 (9th Cir. 1981), Varner’s first argument fails. Nor was counsel’s failure to request the instruction ineffective assistance. On the record before us, we conclude th at defense counsel’s conduct “falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2026 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2026

 To make appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for the establishment and 
           operation of a plant genetic conservation center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2001

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for the establishment and 
           operation of a plant genetic conservation center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plant Genetic Conservation Center 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATION FOR PLANT GENETIC CONSERVATION CENTER.

    The following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2002:

                       DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

                     Agricultural Research Service

                   plant genetic conservation center

    For the establishment and operation of a center to carry out a 
plant genetic conservation program to store genetic material from rare, 
endangered, and threatened plants, including construction and 
maintenance of a temperature-controlled facility for such purpose, 
$5,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
______________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1           Q2            Q3            Q4           Total
______________________________________________________________________________________

1987......    |            22            19            12            16             69
1988......    |            11             6            12             7             36
1989......    |             5             7             5             5             22
1990......    |             3             5             6             3             17
1991......    |             2             2             3             1              8
1992......    |             1             1             1             4              7
1993......    |             1             2             2             0              5
1994......    |             0             0             0             0              0
1995......    |             0             0             0             0              0
1996......    |             0             2             0             0              2
1997......    |             0             0             0             1              1
1998......    |             0             0             1             0              1
1999......    |             0             1             0             0              1
2000......    |             0             0             0             0              0
2001......    |             0             0             0             0              0
2002......    |             1             0             0             1              2
2003......    |             0             1             0             0              1
2004......    |             0             1             0             0              1
2005......    |             0             0             0             0              0
2006......    |             0             0             0             0              0
2007......    |             0             0             0             0              0
2008......    |             1          n.a.          n.a.          n.a.           n.a.
______________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10610

VICKI LYNN UNDERWOOD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EAST TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-2739-G)

June 4, 1999

Before POLITZ, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vicki Lynn Underwood appeals an adverse summary judgment in favor of

East Texas State University. Having considered the briefs, oral arguments of

counsel, and pertinent parts of the record, and finding neither error nor abuse of

discretion, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001024022
<NAME>                        SEAFOODS PLUS, LTD.                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         586
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               586
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8178
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       200
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9592)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit — 23** **Consent    of Experts and Counsel** ***Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm***     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following    Registration Statements:     (1) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-127600)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Director Deferred Compensation    Plan,     (2) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-116414)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 2004 Long-term Incentive Plan,     (3) Registration Statements    (Form S-8    Nos.    333-115948    and    333-115949)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Retirement Savings Plan,     (4) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 33-56403)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive Plan,     (5) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-69194)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. 1994 Long-term Incentive    Plan, and     (6) Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-74426)    pertaining to the Milacron Inc. Plan for the Deferral of    Directors’ Compensation;     of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements and schedule of Milacron Inc.,    Milacron Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, and the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of    Milacron Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended December 31, 2005.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     Cincinnati, Ohio    March 10, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB) for the 
Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG), as 
required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial 
review of SES performance appraisals and makes recommendations 
regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Inspector 
General.

DATES: Effective Date: September 23, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Phyllis Hughes, Director, Human 
Capital Advisory Services, Administration and Management, DoD OIG, 400 
Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 602-4516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following executives are appointed to the DoD OIG, PRB:

Karen Ellis, Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, Department 
of Agriculture.
Marla Freedman, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, Department of 
Treasury.
William Maharay, Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services, 
Department of Energy.
Lisa Martin, General Counsel, United States Postal Service, Office of 
Inspector General.
Andrew Patchan, Assistant Inspector General for Audits and 
Attestations, Federal Reserve Board.
Peter Usowski, Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, Central 
Intelligence Agency.

    Dated: September 22, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E8-22867 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending October 20, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodFIRSTMERIT CORPORATION                                                                                                  * 3A5Application by FirstMerit Corporation, Akron, Ohio, to acquire Citizens Republic Bancorp, Flint, MichiganNewspaper: 11/13/2012Federal Register: 11/15/2012
#### Oscar LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF THE ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellee.*

No. 12082.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 17, 1932.

St. John Perret, John R. Perez, Hénry G. McMahon, and John H. Holmes, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

James Wilkinson, N. H. Polmer, and George Piazza, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

*

 Rebearing denied November 14, 1932.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned in the case of John Williams et al. v. Board of Levee Commissioners of Orleans Levee District (La. App.) 141 So. 871, decided May 30, 1932, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment herein appealed from be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending December 21, 2019FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodREGIONS BANK                                                                                                            * BranchRegions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, to establish the following branches: 1) Mableton Branch, Intersection of Floyd Road SW and Nickajack Road SW, Mableton, GA; 2) Wallisville Branch, Wallisville Road Intersection with Sam Houston Parkway North, Houston, TX; 3) Uptown Crossing Branch, 5409 South Rice Avenue, Houston, TX; 4)Lake Colony Branch, 4800 Highway 6 South, Missouri City, TX; 5) Harpers Preserve Branch, Intersection of Highway 242 and Harpers Trace, Conroe, TX.Newspaper: 01/02/2020Federal Register: Not applicableRELIANT BANK                                                                                                            * 18C
#### FORD v. COHEN.

No. 5898.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 31, 1939.

C. B. McClung, of Natchitoches, for appellant.

J. D. Rusca, of Natchitoches, for appel-lee.

HAMITER, Judge.

No appearance whatever has been made in this cause by appellant in behalf of his perfected appeal, and by reason of such, a conclusive presumption exists that it has been abandoned.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.