alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure
Capital Fund, LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
|November 5, 2010                               

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will be retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United Rentals Inc.

V .

Merchants Mutual Insurance Company

Civil No. 1 :07-cv-086-JD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 41 .1, as neither an agreement for

judgment nor a stipulation for dismissal has been filed, this case is herewith dismissed with

prejudice .

SO ORDERED.

November 30, 2007 /s/.Iosenh A. DiClerico. Jr.

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Lee Stephen MacPhee, Esq.

Robert J . Consavage , Esq .

Scott A. Ewing, Esq .

Gordon A. Rehnborg, Jr., Esq .

Case 1:07-cv-00086-JD Document 17 Filed 11/30/07 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1384

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Navajo Long

Walk to Bosque Redondo as a national historic trail.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 2001

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. CANNON) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

Navajo Long Walk to Bosque Redondo as a national

historic trail.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Navajo Long Walk

5 National Historic Trail Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. NAVAJO LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:

8 (1) Beginning in the fall of 1863 and ending in

9 the winter of 1864, the Long Walk terminated at

10 Fort Sumner, New Mexico, where the Navajo were
2

•HR 1384 IH

1 held captive, virtually as prisoners of war, for over

2 4 years.

3 (2) More than 3,000 Navajos died at Fort

4 Sumner, either by starvation or malnutrition due to

5 inadequate and poor quality food rations, disease

6 caused by brackish water and improper food prep7 arations, exposure due to inadequate provisions of

8 clothing and shelter, failed food crops, or conflicts

9 between the Navajos and United States military per10 sonnel and other Indian tribes imprisoned at Fort

11 Sumner.

12 (b) TRAIL ESTABLISHED.—Section 5(a) of the Na13 tional Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is

14 amended—

15 (1) by redesignating the second paragraph (21)

16 (relating to the Ala Kahakai National Historic

17 Trail) as paragraph (22); and

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new

19 paragraph:

20 ‘‘(23) The Navajo Long Walk National Historic Trail

21 (hereinafter in the paragraph referred to as the ‘Long

22 Walk Trail’), a trail consisting of an overland route trav23 eled by more than 8,000 Navajo Indians forced to walk

24 nearly 350 miles as a result of their removal by the United

25 States Government from their ancestral lands in north-
3

•HR 1384 IH

1 eastern Arizona and northwestern New Mexico to the

2 Bosque Redondo in eastern New Mexico. The Long Walk

3 Trail is generally located within the corridor extending

4 through portions of Canyon de Chelley, Arizona, and Albu5 querque, Canyon Blanco, Anton Chico, Canyon Piedra

6 Pintado, and Fort Sumner, New Mexico, as generally de7 picted on the map entitled ll, and dated ll. Such

8 map shall be on file and available for public inspection

9 in the Office of the National Park Service, Department

10 of the Interior. The Long Walk Trail shall be administered

11 by the Secretary of the Interior. No lands or interests

12 therein outside the boundaries of any federally adminis13 tered area may be acquired by the Federal Government

14 for the Long Walk Trail except with the consent of the

15 owner thereof.’’.

Æ
Monthly Payment Date Statement distributed to holders of Series 2004-1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  

							
	JPMorgan Chase Bank – Structured Finance Services	  	 
	 4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
	  	Distribution Date: 4/26/04
	 New York, NY 10004-2477
	  	 
	 Officer:
	  	 Taoheed A. Agbabiaka
	  	 ph: 212-623-4481
	  	 
	 	  	 	  	 fax: 212-623-5858
	  	 

  
 GreenPoint Mortgage
Securities LLC 
  
 GreenPoint Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1

  
 Home Equity Loan Asset-Backed Notes 
 Series 2004-1 
  

																	
	 Distribution In Dollars


	 Class

	  	 Original
 Face
 Value

	  	 Beginning
 Principal
 Balance

	  	Principal

	  	Interest

	  	Total

	  	Realized
Loses

	  	Deferred
Interest

	  	 Ending
 Principal
 Balance


	 A1
	  	202,045,000.00	  	185,863,481.45	  	13,754,317.93	  	218,079.82	  	13,972,397.75	  	0.00	  	0.00	  	172,109,163.52
	 TOTALS
	  	202,045,000.00	  	185,863,481.45	  	13,754,317.93	  	218,079.82	  	13,972,397.75	  	0.00	  	0.00	  	172,109,163.52

  

													
	 Factor Information Per $1000 Of Original Face


	 Class

	  	Cusip

	  	Beginning
Principal

	  	Principal

	  	Interest

	  	Total

	  	Ending
Principal


	 A1
	  	395385AQ0	  	919.91131406	  	68.07551748	  	1.07936262	  	69.15488010	  	851.83579658
	 TOTALS
	  	 	  	919.91131406	  	68.07551748	  	1.07936262	  	69.15488010	  	851.83579658

  

										
	 Pass-Through Rates

	 
	 Class

	  	Previous

	 	 	Current

	 	 	Next

	 
	 A1
	  	1.320000	%	 	1.320000	%	 	0.000000	%
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Marc D. Durand, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: February 14, 2011





/s/ Marc D. DurandMarc D. DurandChief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

David J. Fournier, III

v. Civil No. 08-cv-398-JL

Lakeshore Estates

Associates, LLC

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

November 24, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 7) is approved as

submitted.

Based on the discussions between the court and counsel at

the conference, ¶¶ 5, 6, 7, and 32 of the Complaint are deemed

admitted, while ¶ 11 is deemed denied, without prejudice to

amendment if warranted by the evidence.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: November 25, 2008

cc: V. Richards Ward, Jr., Esq.

Valerie C. Samuels, Esq.

John-Mark Turner, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00398-JL Document 9 Filed 11/25/08 Page 1 of 1
#### In re: Frank R. AIELLO, dba Lincoln Convalescent Hospital, dba Live Oak Care Center, dba Harvest Oaks, Debtor. Frank R. Aiello, dba Lincoln Convalescent Hospital dba Live Oak Care Center dba Harvest Oaks, Appellant, v. John Connolly, Chapter 11 Trustee, Appellee.

No. 02-15698.

D.C. No. CV-01-00867-DFL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 14, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*361MEMORANDUM **

Frank R. Aello appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing as moot Mello’s appeal of several bankruptcy court orders. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, *Arnold & Baker Farms v. United States (In re Arnold & Baker Farms),*85 F.3d 1415, 1419 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm.

The district court properly determined that Aello’s appeal of the bankruptcy court order approving the reorganization plan is moot because Aello failed to obtain a stay pending appeal, and the plan has been substantially implemented. *See id.; Trone v. Roberts Farms, Inc. (In re Roberts Farms, Inc.),*652 F.2d 793, 797-98 (9th Cir.1981). Similarly, Aello’s appeal of the order approving the settlement between the bankruptcy estate and the United States Department of Health and Human Services is moot because Aello failed to obtain a stay pending appeal and the rights of third parties have intervened. *See Arnold & Baker Farms,*85 F.3d at 1420.

We reject Aello’s contention that the automatic bankruptcy stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362, prevents his appeal from being deemed moot.

Aello’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2002: Q3... 7.2 7.2 n.a. 6.8

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 n.a. 6.5

2003: Q1... 6.7 6.6 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.0

 Q3... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.1

 Q4... 6.3 6.3 n.a. 6.1

2004: Q1... 6.3 6.2 n.a. 5.9

 Q2... 6.5 6.4 n.a. 6.2

 Q3... 6.6 6.6 n.a. 6.3

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2002: Q3... 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.8

 Q4... 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.5

2003: Q1... 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.5

 Q2... 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.2

 Q3... 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6

 Q4... 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2

2004: Q1... 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.0

 Q2... 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.1

 Q3... 7.4 7.4 7.5 6.9

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2002: Q3... 7.3 6.9 7.3 7.2

 Q4... 6.8 6.7 7.0 6.7

2003: Q1... 6.5 6.5 6.6 6.6

 Q2... 6.8 6.4 6.4 6.4

 Q3... 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.5

 Q4... 6.5 6.5 6.9 6.7

2004: Q1... 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.3

 Q2... 6.9 6.4 6.5 6.5

 Q3... 7.2 7.0 7.0 6.7
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2002: Q3... n.a. 7.9 7.9 7.5

 Q4... n.a. 7.6 7.6 7.2

2003: Q1... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.3 6.9

 Q3... n.a. 7.2 7.3 6.8

 Q4... n.a. 7.1 7.2 6.8

2004: Q1... n.a. 7.0 7.1 6.7

 Q2... n.a. 7.1 7.1 6.8

 Q3... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.0

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2002: Q3... n.a. 7.4 7.5 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 7.2 7.2 6.9

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q4... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.6 6.7 6.4

 Q2... n.a. 6.7 6.8 6.5

 Q3... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.7

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2002: Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

2003: Q1... n.a. 6.9 7.6 7.5

 Q2... n.a. 6.5 7.1 7.0

 Q3... n.a. 6.5 7.0 7.2

 Q4... n.a. 6.5 6.9 7.3

2004: Q1... n.a. 6.4 7.1 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 6.8 7.2 7.1

 Q3... n.a. 6.7 7.2 7.4

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gerard Bean

v. Civil No. 07-cv-328-JL

Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden 

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a pleading entitled "Motion to Appeal 

Motion for Postponement" (doc. no. 130). This pleading, like 

various others submitted by the Petitioner, is difficult to interpret 

and does not clearly state the desired relief. To the extent this 

pleading is intended to be another request for reconsideration, that 

request is DENIED. To the extent the Petitioner intended this 

pleading to serve as a motion to extend the time to file a Notice 

of Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(i), that motion is 

GRANTED. The Petitioner has until June 1, 2012, to file both a Notice 

of Appeal and a request for the First Circuit Court of Appeals to 

issue a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). 

SO ORDERED.

May 8, 2012

cc: Gerard Bean, pro se

Elizabeth Woodcock, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-00328-JL Document 131 Filed 05/08/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.26

THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE AND ARE BEING OFFERED AND SOLD IN
RELIANCE ON EXEMPTIONS FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933 AND SUCH LAWS. THE SECURITIES ARE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS ON
TRANSFERABILITY AND RESALE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR RESOLD EXCEPT AS
PERMITTED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SUCH LAWS PURSUANT TO
REGISTRATION OR EXEMPTION THEREFROM.

                          COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

                                                                   July 29, 2002

                    Certificate Representing 600,000 Warrants
                      To Purchase Shares of Common Stock of

                                 CYTOMEDIX, INC.

         THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT, for value received, HMA Advisors Inc., or its
assigns, (the "Holder"), is entitled to purchase from Cytomedix, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) shares of
the Company's common stock, par value $.0001 per share (the "Common Stock"), on
the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.

         I. Grant and Vesting. The Company hereby grants to the Holder warrants
(the "Warrants") to purchase up to Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) shares of
Common Stock at a purchase price equal to $1.00 per share. The Warrants shall
vest as to all shares of Common Stock immediately.

         II. Exercise Period. The Warrants shall be exercisable commencing on
the date of original issuance of the Warrants and continue to be exercisable
until 5:00 p.m., Central Standard Time, August 7, 2007.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Warrant Certificate to
be duly executed and delivered as of the 29th day of July, 2002.

                                        CYTOMEDIX, INC.

                                        ____________________________
                                        Kent Smith, President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Greg Schillinger

v. Case No. 05-cv-459-JD

Northern NH Correctional Facility

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 24, 2006, for the reasons stated therein. The Motion for

Temporary Restraining Order is deemed moot.

SO ORDERED.

February 16, 2006 /s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. 

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Greg Schillinger, pro se

Andrew Livernois, Esq.

Case 1:05-cv-00459-JD Document 20 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 1
Q1 2004 Exhibit 10.2





                                           Exhibit 10.2


                                                               **Confidential Treatment Requested



E-LOAN/zipRealty

                  Amendment Two to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution,

                  And Related Services Agreement



This Amendment Two ("Amendment") to the Marketing, Promotion,
Distribution, And Related Services Agreement dated April 15, 2002 (the
"Agreement"), by and between E-LOAN, Inc. and zipRealty, Inc., amends,
modifies and supplements the Agreement as set forth below. All terms of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless expressly amended,
modified or supplemented herein.



	Term.  The Term of the Agreement shall be extended beyond August 31,
2003, for an additional period from September 1, 2003 until December 31, 2003
(the "Extension Period").

	Compensation.  During the Extension Period, E-LOAN shall pay to
zipRealty the following compensation: 

	
Month
	
Amount

	
September 2003
	
$[**]  

	
October 2003
	
$[**]  

	
November 2003
	
$[**]  

	
December 2003
	
$[**]  

	
Total
	
$[**]  





	Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more
counterparts, including facsimiles, each of which will be deemed to be a
duplicate original, but all of which, taken together, will be deemed to
constitute a single instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and
dated below.


	
E- LOAN, INC.
	
zipRealty, Inc.

	
By:      __/s/    ___ Joseph  Kennedy________
	
By:      __/s/  Gary M. Beasley_________

	
Name: __Joseph J. Kennedy________
	
Name: __Gary M. Beasley________

	
Title:   __President________________
	
Title:   __CFO__________________

	
Date:   __8/22/03_________________
	
Date:   ___8/22/03_______________





E-LOAN - zipRealty

   Amendment Two to Marketing, Promotion, Distribution, and Related Services Agreement



                                                               **Confidential Treatment Requested
1The affidavit of ARNF Mooney and plaintiff’s attested

medical record demonstrate substantial and current adequate

medical care.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Joseph Vaillancourt

a/k/a Bryan Bernard

v. Civil No. 06-cv-438-JD

New Hampshire Department of

Corrections, et al.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

 Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction deals with

allegedly deficient medical care by Berlin prison officials

related to alleged bleeding episodes on January 21 and 25, 2006

and in the period June-July to September 6, 2006. However,

despite the huge list of his desired defendants, none of them are

Berlin prison medical personnel. Plaintiff cannot, as a matter

of law, be entitled to an injunction against the Concord prison

officials for medical neglect allegedly at the hands of Berlin

officials six months to one year ago. The motion is but one more

of plaintiff’s frivolous filings. I recommend that the motion be

denied without the necessity of a wasteful evidentiary hearing.1 

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

Case 1:06-cv-00438-JD Document 164 Filed 05/03/07 Page 1 of 2
2

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 3, 2007

cc: Joseph Vaillancourt, pro se

 Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

 Nancy Sue Tierney, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00438-JD Document 164 Filed 05/03/07 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.'s
33-82800, 333-75025, 333-89647) on Form S-8 of First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.
of our report dated January 19, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of First Oak Brook Bancshares Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000,
annual report on Form 10-K of First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 2001
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 10.3 7.6 9.8 8.6 36.6 9.4 8.6 11.6 13.5 7.2 1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2003: Q1... 14.1 8.8 11.3 11.8 35.2 14.2 10.4 11.7 15.5 14.3  Q2... 13.5 6.9 9.0 13.7 21.1 15.0 10.3 12.4 13.3 14.5  Q3... 10.4 8.4 6.4 8.9 21.1 12.4 9.2 10.3 11.1 10.3  Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.