alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          65,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      140 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,956
<PP&E>                                          57,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,015
<BONDS>                                            505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1<F1>
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,065
<SALES>                                          5,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,702
<CGS>                                            1,282
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (648)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.62)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS PAR VALUE OF READING ENTERTAINMENT SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending October 1, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodHOMETRUST BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                              * 3A5
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
-0214 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSHUA GLEN REID,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 12, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2022

08/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0214
#### Dutrel E. BAKER v. SUN OIL CO. et al. (TRAVELERS INS. CO. OF HARTFORD, Conn., Intervenor).

No. 3116.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

May 19, 1949.

A. Deutsche O’Neal, Houma, for appellant.

Frank T. Doyle, New Orleans, Nicholas Masters, New Orleans, Harvey Peltier, Thibodaux, for appellee.

Elton A. Darsey, Houma, for inter-venor.

DORE, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Thibodaux et al. and Baker v. Sun Oil Company and Baker v. J. C. Chance Wells Service, Inc., La.App., 40 So.2d 761, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
#### William Israel's Farm Cooperative, Appellant, v Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

[812 NYS2d 5]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered November 24, 2004, denying this CPLR article 78 petition to annul the determination of respondent Board of Standards and Appeals, filed June 10, 2004, which had granted a variance to respondent Tribeach Holdings, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Petitioner did not seek to enjoin either the demolition of the former garage or the construction of the new building. The garage was razed over a year ago, and the new building’s superstructure is 75% complete. Therefore, petitioner’s appeal is moot *(see e.g. Matter of Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v New York City Landmarks Preserv. Commn., 2*NY3d 727 [2004]). Were we to consider the merits, we would affirm. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
__________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3           Q4           Total
__________________________________________________________________________________

1985......    |            12          21          17            18             68
1986......    |            14          14          21            16             65
1987......    |            22          19          12            16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12             7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5             5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6             3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3             1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1             4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2             0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0             0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0             0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0             1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1             0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0             1              2
2003......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2004......    |             0           1           0             0              1
2005......    |             0           0           0             0              0
2006......    |             0           0           0          n.a.           n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending July 31, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodUNITED FINANCIAL BANKING COMPANIES, INC.                                                                                CICJeffrey T. Valcourt, JNV Limited Partnership, II, and JNV Limited Partnership, III, all of Arlington, Vrginia, acting in concert to control 33.77% of the voting shares of United Financial Banking Companies, Inc., Vienna, Virginia.Newspaper: 08/08/2010Federal Register: 08/11/2010
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cragar
Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard P. Franke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard P. Franke
---------------------------
Richard P. Franke
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1917

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of

a monthly stipend to the surviving parents (known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the Armed Forces who die during a period of

war.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 21, 2001

Mr. GILMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the

payment of a monthly stipend to the surviving parents

(known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the

Armed Forces who die during a period of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Parents An5 nuity Act’’.
2

•HR 1917 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 15 of title 38, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing new subchapter:

5 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD

6 STAR PARENTS

7 ‘‘§ 1571. Gold Star parents

8 ‘‘(a) The Secretary shall pay monthly to each person

9 who has received a Gold Star lapel pin under section 1126

10 of title 10 as a parent of a person who died in a manner

11 described in subsection (a) of that section a special pen12 sion in an amount determined under subsection (b).

13 ‘‘(b) The amount of special pension payable under

14 this section with respect to the death of any person shall

15 be $125 per month. In any case in which there is more

16 than one parent eligible for special pension under this sec17 tion with respect to the death of a person, the Secretary

18 shall divide the payment equally among those eligible par19 ents.

20 ‘‘(c) The receipt of special pension shall not deprive

21 any person of any other pension or other benefit, right,

22 or privilege to which such person is or may hereafter be

23 entitled under any existing or subsequent law. Special pen24 sion shall be paid in addition to all other payments under

25 laws of the United States.
3

•HR 1917 IH

1 ‘‘(d) Special pension shall not be subject to any at2 tachment, execution, levy, tax lien, or detention under any

3 process whatever.

4 ‘‘(e) For purposes of this section, the term ‘parent’

5 has the meaning provided in section 1126(d)(2) of title

6 10.’’.

7 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such

8 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS

‘‘1571. Gold Star parents.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1571 of title 38,

10 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take

11 effect on the first day of the first fiscal year beginning

12 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-27-01-JL

Douglas M. Johnson

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

13) filed by defendant is granted in part. The continuance is

limited to 30 days.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Joseph N. Laplante_

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Date: May 29, 2009

cc: John T. Pendleton 

Debra M. Walsh 

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00027-JL Document 14 Filed 05/29/09 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending March 20, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCNB                                                                                                                     * 18C
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Richard Patton, President, Chief Executive Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Richard Patton                          
|G. Richard Patton                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|July 30, 2004                                  



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending August 11, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodARVEST BANK                                                                                                             * BranchArvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 5311 West 6th Avenue, Stillwater, Oklahoma.Newspaper: 08/18/2007Federal Register: Not applicableCITIZENS BANCSHARES OF BATESVILLE, INC.                                                                                 CICNotice by the Irrevocable Trust of Doyle W. Rogers, Sr. and Josephine Raye Rogers, with Barbara R. Hoover and Doyle W. Rogers, Jr. as trustees, in concert with Doyle W. Rogers, Sr., all of Batesville, Arkansas, to increase control of Citizens Bancshares of Batesville, Inc., Batesville, Arkansas.Newspaper: 08/29/2007Federal Register: 08/15/2007FIRST SECURITY, INC.                                                                                                    CICNotice by Harry Roberts, individually, and The Roberts Group, Owensboro, Kentucky, to gain control of First Security, Inc., Owensboro, Kentucky.  The Roberts Group consists of Harry Roberts, Willa Roberts, Harry L. Roberts and Sherry Turner, all of Owensboro, Kentucky.Newspaper: 08/19/2007Federal Register: 08/15/2007LONOKE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                 * 3A3Lonoke Bancshares, Inc., Lonoke, Arkansas, to acquire additional shares of Central Bank, Little Rock, Arkansas, resulting in ownership of up to 9.65 percent.Newspaper: 08/18/2007Federal Register: 08/09/2007LONOKE BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                                 * 3A3Lonoke Bancshares, Inc., Lonoke, Arkansas, to retain its existing ownership interest of up to 6.88 percent of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc., Bentonville, Arkansas, and thereby retain its indirect ownership of Pinnacle Bank, Bentonville, Arkansas.Newspaper: 09/02/2007Federal Register: 08/09/2007M&P COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. 401(K) EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN                                                     * 3A3M & P Community Bancshares, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Newport, Arkansas, to acquire additional shares of M & P Community Bancshares, Inc., Newport, Arkansas, for total ownership of up to 32 percent.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not available
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 6, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arcenio Duran, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 297]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered on or about April 30, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record *488and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
| *Release Date: January 14, 2005* |
|----------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2199 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2199

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government 
Improvement Act of 1997 to permit any Federal law enforcement agency to 
    enter into a cooperative agreement with the Metropolitan Police 
  Department of the District of Columbia to assist the Department in 
  carrying out crime prevention and law enforcement activities in the 
    District of Columbia if deemed appropriate by the Chief of the 
Department and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Police 
Coordination Amendment Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADDITIONAL FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO ENTER 
              INTO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS WITH METROPOLITAN POLICE 
              DEPARTMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Section 11712(d) of the National Capital Revitalization and Self-
Government Improvement Act of 1997 (D.C. Code, sec. 4-192(d)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(33) Any other law enforcement agency of the Federal 
        government that the Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department 
        and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia 
        deem appropriate to enter into an agreement pursuant to this 
        section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```