alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1902 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1902

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit forced 
 overtime hours for certain health care employees who provide care to 
                               patients.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2001

Mr. Langevin (for himself, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, and Mr. Frank) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to prohibit forced 
 overtime hours for certain health care employees who provide care to 
                               patients.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Care Employees Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NURSES AND OVERTIME HOURS.

    Section 7(j) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
207(j)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``No employer'' and inserting ``(1) Subject 
        to paragraph (2), no employer''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) An employer described in paragraph (1) may not require an 
employee covered by an agreement or understanding described in such 
paragraph (other than a physician) who provides health care to patients 
to work more than 8 hours in any workday or 80 hours in any 14-day work 
period, except in the case of a natural disaster or while a Federal, 
State, or local declaration of a state of emergency is in effect in the 
locality in which such employee is employed. No such employer may 
discriminate or take any other adverse action against such an employee 
for declining to work more than 8 hours in a workday or 80 hours in a 
14-day work period. Such an employee may voluntarily work more than 8 
hours in any workday or more than 80 hours in a 14-day work period, at 
the request of the employee's employer. Notwithstanding any provision 
of title 5 or title 38, United States Code, to the contrary, this 
paragraph applies to an employee appointed under either such title 
(other than a physician) who provides health care to patients.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

William Hernandez

V .

Osram Sylvania, Incorporated

Civil No . 08-cv-280-JL

ORDER

Re : Document No . 12, Motion for Sanction s

Ruling : Denied . The motion borders on the outrageous . The

court recalls the plaintiff from the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference . Given that English is the plaintiff's second language

and taking into consideration his lack of familiarity with

litigation procedure, as well as the fact that he appeared in court

on the day in question, his explanation - even as represented in

the defendant's motion - seems both plausible and understandable,

if unfortunate . While the frustration of the defendant and counsel

is certainly understandable, the motion does not exhibit the

"traits of civility, courtesy, and perspective" (citation

presumably unnecessary) normally exhibited by both senior counsel

of record, with whom the court is familiar by both experience and

reputation . Thus, the court presumes, hopefully correctly, that

the request for costs and fees was demanded by Attorney Vient, who

is not a member of the New Hampshire bar . Denied .

Joseph N . Laplante

U .S . District Judge

Date : May 21, 200 9

cc : William Hernandez, pro se

Jennifer Parent, Esq .

Charla Stevens, Esq .

Neil Nicholson, Esq .

Case 1:08-cv-00280-JL Document 14 Filed 05/21/09 Page 1 of 1
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2002: Q4... 48 22 30 27 56 17 46 3

2003: Q1... 52 27 20 30 52 18 53 3 Q2... 28 50 22 19 65 16 34 5 Q3... 28 47 25 17 70 13 31 6 Q4... 8 33 59 6 61 33 16 52004: Q1... 7 25 68 5 52 43 8 4 Q2... 2 37 61 2 55 42 5 4 Q3... 15 47 38 5 63 33 10 5 Q4... 20 30 50 5 56 40 11 4

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2002: Q4... 63 30 8 40 50 9 65 3

2003: Q1... 72 24 5 44 48 8 68 3 Q2... 36 47 17 27 60 13 46 4 Q3... 22 46 32 18 68 15 36 4 Q4... 17 35 48 10 64 25 20 52004: Q1... 11 42 47 8 68 25 16 5 Q2... 11 49 40 9 65 26 15 6 Q3... 11 51 38 6 71 23 12 6 Q4... 10 40 50 5 60 35 9 5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2002: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.

2003: Q1... 57 22 22 52 30 17 52 3 Q2... 50 35 15 46 46 8 58 2 Q3... 46 38 17 33 63 4 46 4 Q4... 30 22 48 17 70 13 26 32004: Q1... 18 55 27 14 73 14 27 5 Q2... 13 43 43 0 70 30 22 4 Q3... 5 36 59 0 73 27 9 4 Q4... 17 30 52 13 57 30 13 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
##### 



EXHIBIT 11.1

THOUSAND TRAILS, INC.
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(Dollars and common shares in thousands)

|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |   |       | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | ----- |  | ----------------- | - | ----- | 
|                                                             |  | Six Months Ended  |       |  | Six Months Ended  |  
|                                                             |  | December 31, 2001 |       |  | December 31, 2000 |  
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|BASIC:                                                       |  |                   |       |  |                   |   |       | 
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         |  |                   | 8,163 |  |                   |   | 8,155 | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|Net income allocable to common shareholders                  |  | $                 | 3,864 |  |                   | $ | 1,753 | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|Net income per common share  basic                          |  | $                 | 0.47  |  |                   | $ | 0.21  | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|DILUTED:                                                     |  |                   |       |  |                   |   |       | 
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         |  |                   | 8,163 |  |                   |   | 8,155 | 
|Weighted average common stock equivalents -
Dilutive options |  |                   | 445   |  |                   |   | 442   | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding         |  |                   | 8,608 |  |                   |   | 8,597 | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|Net income allocable to common shareholders                  |  | $                 | 3,864 |  |                   | $ | 1,753 | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |  
|Net income per common share  diluted                        |  | $                 | 0.45  |  |                   | $ | 0.20  | 
|                                                             |  |                   |       |  |                   |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 195 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 195

 To amend the vaccine injury compensation portion of the Public Health 
   Service Act to permit a petition for compensation to be submitted 
           within 48 months of the first symptoms of injury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2001

 Mr. Sweeney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the vaccine injury compensation portion of the Public Health 
   Service Act to permit a petition for compensation to be submitted 
           within 48 months of the first symptoms of injury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME LIMIT.

    Section 2116(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
300aa-16) is amended by striking ``36 months'' and inserting ``48 
months''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 7320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-2239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,210A; TA-W-62,210B]


Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division, Charlotte, North 
Carolina; Including an Employee of Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile 
Chemicals Division, Charlotte, North Carolina, Located in Marietta, 
Georgia; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on November 5, 2007, applicable to workers 
of Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division, Charlotte, North 
Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 
21, 2007 (72 FR 65607).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm.
    New information shows that a worker separation occurred involving 
an employee of the Charlotte, North Carolina facility of Dexter 
Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division located in Marietta, Georgia. 
Mr. Richard H. Bass provided sales function services supporting the 
production of specialty chemicals for the textile industry that is 
produced at the subject firm.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include an employee of the Charlotte, North Carolina 
facility of Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division working out 
of Marietta, Georgia.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division, Charlotte, 
North Carolina who were adversely affected by increased imports as an 
upstream supplier of component parts for textiles.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-62,210A is hereby issued as 
follows:

``All workers of Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division, 
Charlotte, North Carolina (TA-W-62,210A) including an employee of 
Dexter Chemical LLC, Textile Chemicals Division, Charlotte, North 
Carolina located in Marietta, Georgia (TA-W-62,210B), who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 
25, 2006, through November 5, 2009, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''


    Signed at Washington, DC this 29th day of January 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division Of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E8-2239 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1994...... 75.1 82.9 74.3 72.3 51.6 75.7 58.6 59.8 70.4 80.2 1995...... 73.8 83.9 75.9 73.0 53.1 72.2 61.7 63.9 73.6 76.7 1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2002: Q3... 72.2 53.6 57.8 78.2 75.1 67.9 68.5 68.7 68.5 74.8  Q4... 81.4 78.1 65.4 81.8 37.9 93.5 67.6 62.8 68.0 92.2 2003: Q1... 74.7 64.0 79.5 75.4 61.7 86.0 68.2 67.5 63.7 80.8  Q2... 69.2 53.9 63.8 67.1 74.0 84.0 66.7 62.8 54.8 79.9  Q3... 78.2 74.9 41.0 81.0 78.2 88.8 69.7 64.4 73.6 84.1  Q4... 74.9 75.5 53.0 75.3 67.4 87.1 66.0 65.6 61.6 83.4 2004: Q1... 69.4 65.2 62.7 66.8 55.1 86.3 64.5 66.2 61.9 72.3  Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Inland Resources Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-41662), Form S-8 (File No. 33-
84640), Form S-3 (File No. 33-84766) and Form S-3 (File No. 33-80392) of our
reserve appraisal, dated February 23, 1996, and our estimated proved reserves
review, dated January 27, 1997, respectively, relating to the estimated oil and
gas reserves and future net income attributable to certain oil and gas interests
of Inland Resources Inc. as of January 1, 1996, and January 1, 1997,
respectively, which reserve appraisal and estimated proved reserves review is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



                                     /s/ Ryder Scott Company Petroleum Engineers
                                     RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                     PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                     Denver, Colorado
                                     February 18, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 08-cr-164-01–03-SM

Juan Galan and James Bell,

 Defendants

O R D E R

Defendant Galan’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

23). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of July 2009. Defendant Galan

shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than May 18, 2009. On the

filing of such waiver, the continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 24 Filed 05/06/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on July 21, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 6, 2009

cc: Daniel D. Lustenberger, Esq.

Jeffrey S. Levin, Esq. 

Jennifer C. Davis, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00164-SM Document 24 Filed 05/06/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Daniel L.
Scharre, the Chief Executive Officer of Larscom Incorporated (the "Company"),
and Donald W. Morgan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th
day of May, 2004.

/s/ Daniel L. Scharre                              /s/ Donald W. Morgan
---------------------                              ----------------------
Daniel L. Scharre                                  Donald W. Morgan
Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005              /s/ Jimmy D. Wright
                                 -------------------
                                 Jimmy D. Wright
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-199-01-SM

Edwin Adames

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 13) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a Waiver

of Speedy Trial Rights not later than February 28, 2008. On the filing of such waiver,

his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00199-SM Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 21, 2008 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

February 21, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Jessica Brown, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00199-SM Document 14 Filed 02/21/08 Page 2 of 2