alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification

 

I, Rajesh Kalathur, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of John Deere Owner Trust 2019 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing, and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conductedin preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects;and

 

5.             Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association (as indenture trustee).
H. Res. 846 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 6, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

6) to reduce our Nation’s dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater 

efficiency, and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and 

Renewables Reserve to invest in alternative energy, and for 

other purposes, with Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order 

except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single 

motion offered by the Majority Leader or his designee that 

the House concur in each of the Senate amendments with the 

respective amendment printed in the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or 

their designees. The previous question shall be considered as 
2 

•HRES 846 EH 

ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening 

motion or demand for division of the question. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of the motion 

to concur pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54852-54853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-956-1910-5EML], ES-055520 Group 28, Maine


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Maine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The plat represents the dependent resurvey and survey of lands held 
in trust by the United States of America for the Penobscot Indian 
Nation in Lakeville Plantation, North of Bingham's Penobscot Purchase, 
Penobscot County, Maine. The survey was accepted on September 11, 2008.
    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM 
receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to 
the date of official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest.

[[Page 54853]]

    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals. Copies of the plat will be made 
available upon request and prepayment of the reproduction fees.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Ronald J. Eberle,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. E8-22191 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2






              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.













August 14, 2008                             /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                            Vice President and Chief Financial
                                            Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Stephen Johnston, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00344-JL

Pauline Eastman

 ORDER ON JURY SELECTION

Jury selection in the above-captioned matter will be

conducted under the “struck” method and will not include

attorney-conducted voir dire. See 28 U.S.C. § 1861 et seq.; Fed.

R. Civ. P. 47, 48, 49; L.R. 47.2, 47.3, 48. It will be conducted

as follows:

1. Size of jury: Eight jurors (and no alternates)

will be seated. Barring excusal pursuant to Rule

47(c), all jurors shall participate in the

verdict. The verdict shall be unanimous and no

verdict shall be taken from the jury if its number

is reduced to fewer than six members unless the

parties agree otherwise subject to court approval.

2. Standard voir dire: Once the jury venire is

seated in the courtroom, the court will briefly

describe the case, have counsel introduce

themselves and their clients, read the names of

potential witnesses, and ask the court’s

“standard” voir dire questions as may be

supplemented upon request of the parties.

3. Random selection and initial excusals for cause: 

As each juror’s name is randomly drawn, the juror

will be asked whether he or she has any “yes”

answers or other responses to the court’s general

voir dire questions. If the juror indicates “no”

the juror will be seated in the jury box by a

Case 1:08-cv-00344-JL Document 30 Filed 09/30/10 Page 1 of 2
Deputy Clerk. If the juror answers “yes,” the

juror will be asked to approach the bench for

examination by the court, counsel (if the court

permits), and potential challenge for cause by

counsel. If the juror is found qualified (that

is, not excused for cause), the juror will be

seated in the jury box by a Deputy Clerk. This

process will continue until the total number of

jurors needed, in this case, 14 jurors, is seated

in and in front of the jury box.

4. Attorney voir dire: Both parties declined.

5. Additional challenges for cause: Not necessary as

both parties declined attorney-conducted voir

dire. 

6. Peremptory challenges: After all requests for

excusal for cause have been addressed, counsel may

then exercise their peremptory challenges against

the qualified panel. Each party is entitled to

three peremptory challenges.

7. After the peremptory challenges, the Deputy Clerk

will empanel the necessary number of jurors, in

this case, eight, and will excuse the remainder of

the jury venire.

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: September 30, 2010

cc: Christopher J. Seufert, Esq.

Mark D. Wiseman, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00344-JL Document 30 Filed 09/30/10 Page 2 of 2
9

A.5. Average Effective Interest Rates on Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1997...... 9.2 9.6 9.8 9.9 9.8 8.5 10.2 10.0 9.9 8.8 1998...... 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.6 9.3 8.0 10.1 9.9 9.7 8.4 1999...... 8.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 8.8 7.6 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.1 2000...... 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.3 9.3 10.3 10.2 10.1 9.4 2001...... 7.8 7.6 8.0 8.4 8.3 7.0 9.1 8.7 8.3 7.3 2002...... 5.9 6.1 5.8 6.4 6.7 4.8 7.3 7.0 6.5 5.3 2003...... 5.4 5.1 5.4 5.7 6.0 4.6 6.7 6.4 5.9 4.8 2004...... 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.7 5.5 4.8 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.0 2005...... 6.7 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.7 7.5 7.1 6.5 2006...... 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 7.7 8.9 8.9 8.6 8.0 2007...... 8.3 8.6 8.3 8.5 8.5 7.6 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.0 2008...... 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.9 6.3 4.8 6.8 6.6 6.1 5.3 2005: Q3... 6.7 6.9 6.8 7.1 6.9 5.8 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.3  Q4... 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7 6.7 8.3 8.1 7.7 7.1 2006: Q1... 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 7.3 8.5 8.5 8.2 7.8  Q2... 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.4 8.6 8.8 8.5 7.8  Q3... 8.6 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.0 8.3 9.3 9.2 8.7 8.4  Q4... 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9.1 7.5 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.1 2007: Q1... 8.5 8.9 8.3 8.7 8.9 8.1 9.2 9.1 8.8 8.4  Q2... 8.6 9.0 8.5 8.9 8.7 7.9 9.2 9.1 8.9 8.4  Q3... 8.5 8.9 8.6 8.8 8.4 7.7 9.1 9.2 8.8 8.1  Q4... 7.7 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.1 6.9 8.6 8.5 8.3 7.4 2008: Q1... 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.8 7.1 5.8 7.6 7.4 6.9 6.3  Q2... 5.7 5.5 5.8 6.1 5.9 4.9 6.7 6.4 6.2 5.4  Q3... 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.5 6.3 4.7 6.6 6.6 6.1 4.9  Q4... 4.8 5.0 4.9 5.1 6.5 4.0 6.1 6.1 5.6 4.3 2009: Q1... 5.1 5.8 4.1 5.5 5.4 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Effective (compoundcalculated from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Quarterly estimates are expressed as an annual loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... 17 2 11 4 0 .039 .005 .024 .009 .000

2006...... 20 2 6 1 12 .042 .003 .012 .002 .023

2007...... 8 -3 0 5 6 .015 -.006 .000 .009 .011

2008...... 54 5 8 12 29 .093 .008 .013 .020 .046

2009...... n.a. 33 41 n.a. n.a. n.a. .051 .064 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending November 24, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCITIZENS BANKSHARES, INC.                                                                                               CICNotice filed by the 2007 Voting Trust Agreement, and its trustees, Albert Charles Kelly, Jr. and Peter John Kelly, both of Bristow, Oklahoma; Shawn Trevor Kelly, Edmond, Oklahoma; Paul Harrison Cornell, Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Allison Asbury Kelly, Okemah, Oklahoma, all to acquire control of Citizens Bankshares, Inc., Okemah, Oklahoma, parent of Citizens State Bank, Okemah, Oklahoma.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 11/21/2007FIRST MISSOURI BANCSHARES, INC.                                                                                         CICNotice by Jose L. Evans and Denise K. Evans, both of Kansas City, Missouri, (acting jointly) and David L. Johnson and Sandra L. Castetter, both of Kansas City, Missouri, (acting jointly), and together acting in concert, to acquire control of First Missouri Bancshares, Inc., parent of First Missouri National Bank, both in Brookfield, Missouri, through the acquisition of voting shares.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableHARKER INVESTMENTS, LLLP                                                                                                4c8
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONUNDER SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each ofthe undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in thisperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc. for theperiods covered by this periodic report.

 
| Date: August 8, 2008  | /s/ Michael C. Pearce                  |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       | Michael C. Pearce                      |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer  and President |
|                       |                                   |
| Date: August 8,  2008 | /s/ Tracy S. Clifford                  |
|                       | Tracy S. Clifford                      |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of HomeLife Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Cimerman,
the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Andrew Cimerman
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Andrew Cimerman
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Date: October 15, 2004




               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of HomeLife Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marie M. May, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Marie M. May
                                        --------------------------
                                        Marie M. May
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Date:  October 15, 2004
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1850

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and Health Facility Needs

for Seniors in the 21st Century and to make technical corrections to

the law governing the Commission.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself and Mr. FRANK) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To extend the Commission on Affordable Housing and

Health Facility Needs for Seniors in the 21st Century

and to make technical corrections to the law governing

the Commission.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Housing Com5 mission Extension Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1850 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SENIORS HOUSING AND HEALTH FA2 CILITY NEEDS COMMISSION AND TECHNICAL

3 CORRECTIONS.

4 Section 525 of the Departments of Veterans Affairs

5 and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent

6 Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (42 U.S.C. 12701

7 note) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (d)(4), by striking ‘‘reimburs9 able’’ and inserting ‘‘non-reimbursable’’;

10 (2) in the first sentence of subsection (f)—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘Banking and’’; and

12 (B) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2001’’ and

13 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2002’’; and

14 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘June 30,

15 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2003’’.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130972 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### YUKO PHILIPPS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130972 COA: 266740 WCAC: 04-000138 CASCADE ENGINEERING, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
14

A.9. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan, May 5-9, 200Percent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,313,049 37,245 75,683 104,563 137,500 294,8Number of loans 20,134 6,896 5,139 3,132 2,063 1,9Weighted average maturity (months)1 24.47 9.91 10.97 13.50 19.86 25.7

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.67 2.28 2.55 3.59 5.62 10.0

Weighted average risk rating3 3.25 3.15 3.20 3.19 3.25 3.

Weighted average interest rate4 5.47 6.22 6.07 6.00 5.61 5. Standard error5 .27 .20 .20 .23 .25 .

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.35 7.08 6.86 6.76 6.25 6. 25th percentile 4.59 5.27 5.12 5.12 4.86 4. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.16 5.66 5.87 6.48 5.46 5. Other livestock 5.00 5.79 5.90 5.25 5.23 5. Other current operating expenses7 5.71 6.27 6.16 6.10 5.60 5.

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.51 7.44 6.55 6.75 6.46 6. Farm real estate 6.37 6.30 6.34 6.64 6.51 6. Other8 5.00 5.90 5.55 5.56 5.30 5.0

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 80.29 80.45 82.88 81.68 79.18 71.0 Under commitment 75.87 88.04 87.96 82.16 78.41 73. Callable 19.55 25.05 25.81 24.97 20.37 22. Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.87 3.62 3.28 5.52 6.52 7. Other livestock 6.50 3.32 4.47 7.03 6.75 6.4 Other current operating expenses7 41.83 78.06 73.28 62.57 53.11 45.7 Farm machinery and equipment 5.94 3.01 4.04 4.22 6.44 4. Farm real estate 9.66 .34 1.63 1.84 5.57 10. Other8 31.19 11.65 13.31 18.82 21.63 25.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 14.73 6.28 6.28 8.82 12.72 15. Other 81.15 89.62 87.82 86.09 83.26 81. Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8.
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1985...... 12 21 17 18 68

1986...... 14 14 21 16 65

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.