alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
                                  Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
1996......    |          95      16       27       24       30      .240      .039      .070     .058      .071
1997......    |          93       6       19       19       50      .230      .014      .049     .045      .112
1998......    |          87       4       15       24       45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18       37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11       17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67       53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40       50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34       35       48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28       17       46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8       16       12       24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |          73       9        7       23       34      .146      .018      .015     .045      .064
2007......    |        n.a.       8     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .014      n.a.     n.a.      n.a.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

GT Solar

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00249-JL

Fabrizio Goi

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

November 17, 2009.

On or before November 30, 2009, the plaintiff will disclose

to the defendant, pursuant to the Protective Order, the property

and proprietary information that it alleges was misappropriated,

coveted, or disclosed to third parties without authorization in

violation of the Trade Secrets Act, or the defendant’s duties

under applicable law.

Within 10 days of that disclosure, the parties shall file a

new Discovery Plan that includes a January 2011 trial date, a

summary judgment deadline no later than September 1, 2010, a

discovery closure date no later than August 30, 2010, and a

DiBennedetto disclosure deadline of February 15, 2010.

Case 1:08-cv-00249-JL Document 58 Filed 11/17/09 Page 1 of 3
2

Based on the discussions between the court and counsel at

the conference, the following affirmative defenses are stricken

without prejudice to being reinstated on request if warranted by

the evidence: estoppel, laches, waiver, statute of limitations

and unclean hands.

The defendant will amend ¶¶ 18 and 24 of its Answer to

clearly and comprehensively indicate its position with respect to

the corresponding allegation in the Complaint.

Summary Judgment. The parties and counsel are advised that

compliance with Rule 56(e) and Local Rule 7.2(b), regarding

evidentiary support for factual assertions, and specification and

delineation of material issues of disputed fact, will be

required.

Discovery disputes. Discovery disputes will be handled by

the undersigned judge, as opposed to the Magistrate Judge, in the

normal course. No motion to compel is necessary. The party or

counsel seeking discovery-related relief should confer with

adverse counsel to choose mutually available dates, and then

contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a conference call with the

court. The court will inform counsel and parties what written

materials, if any, should be submitted in advance of the

conference call.

Case 1:08-cv-00249-JL Document 58 Filed 11/17/09 Page 2 of 3
3

Customary motions to compel discovery, while disfavored by

the undersigned judge, are nonetheless permissible. If counsel

prefer traditional discovery litigation to the conference call

procedure set forth above, any such motion to compel should

expressly request, in the title of the motion, a referral to the

United States Magistrate Judge. Such referral requests will

normally be granted. However, if the Magistrate Judge is recused 

alternate arrangements will be made. 

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: November 17, 2009

cc: R. Matthew Cairns, Esq.

Luke Dauchot, Esq.

Adam J. Gill, Esq.

Richard C. Harlan, Esq.

Elisa Miller, Esq.

Michael Shipley, Esq.

Michael J. Connolly, Esq.

James P. Ball, Esq.

Lanny J. Davis, Esq.

Robert M. Isackson, Esq.

John C. Pitts, Esq.

M. Brendan Smith, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00249-JL Document 58 Filed 11/17/09 Page 3 of 3
Amendment to Shared Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.96 
  
 AMENDMENT TO SHARED SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2004 by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc.
(“Mission”) is made to that certain Shared Services Agreement dated as of May 1, 1999 by and between Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc. and Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC (the “Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, Mission, as successor to Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc., is
the licensee of television broadcast station KCIT, Amarillo, Texas and low power television station KCPN-LP, Amarillo, Texas; 
  
 WHEREAS, Nexstar, as successor to Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC, is the licensee of television broadcast station KAMR-TV, Amarillo, Texas;

  
 WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have assumed the Agreement for
their mutual benefit; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration
of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Nexstar has assumed all of Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC’s rights and obligations under the Agreement. 
  
 2. Mission has assumed all of Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc.’s rights and obligations under the Agreement. 
  
 3. Paragraph 4(g) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the
following is substituted in its place: “4(g) Services Fee. In consideration for the services to be provided to KCIT-TV/KCPN-LP by Nexstar personnel as described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f), Mission will pay Nexstar the fee (the
“Services Fee”) described in this Section 4(g). 
  
 (i) Base Amount. Subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 4(g), the base amount of the Services Fee will be Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) per month. 
  
 (ii) Payment Terms. The Services Fee will be payable
monthly, in arrears, from and after the month during which this Agreement is executed, and will be prorated on a daily basis for the first and last months during which the sharing arrangements described in Sections 4(a) through 4(f) are in effect.

  
 4. These revised payment terms are effective as of the date
hereof. 
  
 5. As so amended, all sections and provisions of the
Agreement are hereby ratified in full. 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the date first written above.

  

			
	 NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ G. Robert Thompson

	 	 	

	 Name:
	 	 G. Robert Thompson

	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer



  

			
	 MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ David S. Smith

	 	 	

	 Name:
	 	 David S. Smith

	 Title:
	 	 President



  

 2
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(c)



                               First Amendment to
                              Amended and Restated
                    Employment Agreement dated June 29, 2000
                                     Between
                             The Walt Disney Company
                                       And
                                Michael D. Eisner

      The Walt Disney Company ("Company") and Michael D. Eisner ("Executive")
hereby amend the Amended and Restated Agreement dated June 29, 2000 between
Company and Executive ("Agreement") as follows, effective as of April 27, 2004.
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this amendment (the "First Amendment")
shall have the meanings given in the Agreement.

      1.    Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to delete the reference to the
            employment of Executive as the Company's "Chairman" and Section
            10(i) of the Agreement is amended to delete the reference to
            Executive's election or retention as "Chairman".

      2.    Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to include a new second
            sentence:

                  "For all purposes under this Agreement, as Chief Executive
                  Officer, Executive shall retain the same duties and
                  responsibilities, with the same scope of authority, with
                  respect to the management of the Company, as he previously
                  held as Chief Executive Officer during the term of the
                  Agreement."

      3.    Executive hereby agrees not to assert any right to terminate his
            employment under Section 10 of the Agreement, or to claim a breach
            of the Agreement or otherwise assert any claim or right, as a result
            of his removal from the position of Chairman on March 3, 2004.

      4.    Except as modified hereby, all provisions of the Agreement shall
            continue in full force and effect. Without limiting the generality
            of the foregoing, except as expressly provided herein, this First
            Amendment shall not affect any other rights that the Executive or
            the Company may have under the Agreement.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment
      on this 27th day of April 2004.

                                                        THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY

                                                        By: ALAN N. BRAVERMAN
                                                            --------------------

        MICHAEL D. EISNER
      ------------------------------
      MICHAEL D. EISNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-119-02-SM

Carlos Marsach

O R D E R

Defendant Marsach’s assented motion to continue the trial is granted 

(document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 2009 trial period. 

Defendant Marsach shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than

November 6, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 14, 2009 at 2:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 21, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 16 Filed 10/24/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 24, 2008

cc: David I. Bailinson , Esq.

Charles J. Keefe, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 16 Filed 10/24/08 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  586,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,177,760
<PP&E>                                         697,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                 614,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,318,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,346,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        110
<COMMON>                                        30,109
<OTHER-SE>                                   (157,907)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,318,580
<SALES>                                        586,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               951,646
<CGS>                                          624,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  556,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,913,158)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,533,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,533,972
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 07-cr-108-01-SM

William R. Slack

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 18) is granted.

Trial has been rescheduled for the September 2008 trial period. Defendant shall file a

Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than May 27, 2008. On the filing of such waiver,

his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh

the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account

Case 1:07-cr-00108-SM Document 19 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 2
2

the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

This is defendant's fourth continuance request. NO FURTHER

CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT EXTRAORDINARY

CIRCUMSTANCES.

Final Pretrial Conference: August 27, 2008 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: September 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

May 19, 2008 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

 Bjorn Lange, Esq. 

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00108-SM Document 19 Filed 05/19/08 Page 2 of 2
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                          
                                Estimated volume               Share of outstanding real estate farm loans
                             (millions of dollars)                              (percent)
                      ____________________________________     ___________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2     Q3      Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                          
1998......    |           6      -1      3      0        5      .022     -.004      .009     .000     .016
1999......    |          15       0      3      5        7      .051     -.001      .011     .015     .022
2000......    |          12     -12      3      8       14      .037     -.037      .009     .022     .040
2001......    |          42      10      9      5       17      .123      .030      .027     .014     .049
2002......    |          35       8      6      5       16      .097      .022      .017     .014     .041
2003......    |          32       4      6      8       14      .082      .010      .015     .021     .034
2004......    |          18       1      5      2       10      .044      .003      .012     .005     .021
2005......    |          17       2     11      4        0      .039      .005      .024     .009     .000
2006......    |          20       2      6      1       12      .042      .003      .012     .002     .023
2007......    |           8      -3      0      5        6      .015     -.006      .000     .009     .011
2008......    |          54       5      8     12       29      .093      .008      .013     .020     .046
2009......    |        n.a.      33     41     34     n.a.      n.a.      .051      .064     .051     n.a.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

25
**Exhibit      32(a)**

**TXU      CORP.**

**Certificate      Pursuant to Section 906 **

**of      Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO**

|   | 1. | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,                2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                  |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/                C. John Wilder          |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | C.                John Wilder              |   |
|   | Title: | Chairman,                President and CEO |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM APPLICABLE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,182
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,014
<PP&E>                                       1,217,331
<DEPRECIATION>                               (530,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 790,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,288
<BONDS>                                        287,829
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         17
<COMMON>                                           430
<OTHER-SE>                                     285,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   790,881
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,147
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (121)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>