alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SEP -s 200 ?

LINDA L JAC,RsSUN QERK

u v

DEPUrv cL6e K

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR T

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Judith Putzel and

Stephen M . Price

Civil No . 06-cv-20 3

O R D E R

All of the judges in this district were recused from

presiding over this case . Accordingly, the case shall be

referred to the District of Maine ; sitting by designation .

The recusal of all of the judges on this court gives rise to

an "emergency" with respect to the referred case as that term is

used in 28 U .S .C . § 636(f) . I therefore concur in the assignment

of a magistrate judge from the designated district to perform the

duties specified in 28 U .S .C . § 636(a)-(c) .

SO ORDERED ,

August 29, 200 7

cc : Clerk, USDC, Maine

Wendy J . Kisch, Esq .

Judith Putzel, pro se

Wilbur A . Glahn, III, Esq .

Case 1:06-cv-00203-DBH Document 14 Filed 09/06/07 Page 1 of 2
s rns~ur, .

ni!, reeir. r OF

Iorzi v

,i ivi I ,

SEP - 6 2007

LINDA I 1A~!)e~"~~ '~'_2!=K

SY __

f)G.PUTY CL IR k

Concurring Orde r

I concur that an emergency exists as specified above an d

that for the duration of this case Magistrate Judge ~~~~~ ~~ Cc~t11

is assigned to perform such duties under 28 U .S .C . S 636(a)-(c )

as may be assigned to him/her by the district judge to whom this

case is assigned .

Date :

cc : Wendy J . Kisch, Esq .

Judith Putzel, pro se

Wilbur A . Glahn, III, Esq .

udge,/Assignee D

2

Case 1:06-cv-00203-DBH Document 14 Filed 09/06/07 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen L. Bartlett

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00358-JL

Mutual Pharmaceutical

Company, Inc., et al.

O R D E R

The court will be issuing an order shortly on the pending

summary judgment motions. To give the parties sufficient

opportunity to review that order before filing their pretrial

statements and proposed jury instructions, the deadline for those

filings (which is currently July 12, 2010, see document no. 170)

shall be extended to July 19, 2010. All other deadlines remain

the same.

The court apologizes to the parties and counsel, as this

extension order should have been issued a few days previously to

help them conserve resources in preparing pretrial filings.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 12, 2010

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 242 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2
cc: Keith M. Jensen, Esq.

Bryan Ballew, Esq.

Patrick J. O’Neal, Esq.

Christine M. Craig, Esq.

Timothy P. Beaupre, Esq.

Paul J. Cosgrove, Esq.

Joseph P. Thomas, Esq.

Jeffrey D. Geoppinger, Esq.

Linda E. Maichl, Esq.

Stephen J. Judge, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 242 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1947

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that fragrances containing known toxic substances or allergens be labeled accordingly.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2001

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY (for herself, and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to

require that fragrances containing known toxic substances or allergens be labeled accordingly.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Notification and

5 Information for Fragrances Act’’.
2

•HR 1947 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING OF FRAGRANCES WITH RESPECT TO

2 KNOWN TOXIC SUBSTANCES OR ALLERGENS.

3 Section 602 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

4 Act (21 U.S.C. 362) is amended by adding at the end the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(g) If it is a fragrance that contains a known toxic

7 substance, unless it bears labeling stating that fact and

8 the common or usual name of such substance.

9 ‘‘(h) If it is a fragrance that contains a known aller10 gen, unless it bears labeling stating that fact and the com11 mon or usual name of such allergen, or the name specified

12 in any definition and standard of identity for the allergen

13 under section 401, as applicable.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000717374
<NAME> 82II
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          91,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,046
<PP&E>                                       8,297,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,485,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 971,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,126
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     958,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   971,351
<SALES>                                        477,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,378
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            120,353
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   120,353
<EPS-BASIC>                                      13.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128106 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128106 COA: 255925 Oakland CC: 90-102799-FH SAAD BAHODA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the January 3, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, May 5-9, 2008Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,815,415 141,348 257,776 726,464 378,494 80,688 52,6Number of loans 30,854 2,584 4,403 12,346 5,671 761 1,1Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.47 38.43 39.18 31.53 16.40 32.11 18.0

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 13.02 30.52 25.78 10.06 6.15 1.05 11.5

Weighted average risk rating3 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 5.84 6.43 6.11 5.79 5.32 5.86 6.5 Standard error5 .24 .11 .24 .26 .40 .25 .5

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 6.72 6.88 6.66 6.72 6.08 6.09 6.7 25th percentile 4.91 6.01 5.39 4.85 4.46 5.61 5.9 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.54 5.99 5.39 5.96 5.32 6.27 7.7 Other livestock 5.81 6.38 6.45 5.85 4.41 4.18 7.9 Other current operating expenses7 6.10 6.47 6.25 6.03 5.82 5.68 6.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 5.93 7.02 7.03 6.29 5.05 5.63 9.0 Farm real estate 6.43 6.60 6.59 6.02 6.06 7.88 6. Other8 5.06 6.08 4.28 4.96 4.90 5.77 5.4

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 69.95 45.48 49.20 75.27 79.32 88.53 72.2 Under commitment 69.50 57.66 76.23 72.60 84.76 53.08 86. Callable 19.93 15.17 31.71 25.36 6.56 4.60 18.4 Subject to prepayment penalty 3.94 .27 13.50 2.73 3.93 1.18 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.81 9.05 7.91 3.61 1.39 .69 2.0 Other livestock 6.68 4.38 15.09 5.43 6.94 4.48 6. Other current operating expenses7 45.49 58.02 39.32 52.45 36.14 23.20 50. Farm machinery and equipment 6.33 2.26 4.26 5.21 11.95 2.91 3. Farm real estate 13.29 18.35 22.50 11.09 8.60 8.67 10. Other8 23.41 7.95 10.92 22.22 34.98 60.06 26.

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 19.06 23.88 25.91 16.59 17.78 10.12 15.0 Other 77.58 74.98 70.14 78.49 80.02 88.58 81. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Mark Goldwasser


Mark Goldwasser


Chief Executive Officer


August 6, 2010
EXHIBIT
23





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-47415, 33-17488, 33-60196, 333-18135, 333-136061 and 333-138506 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-25377 on Form S-3, of our report dated
September 24, 2010,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Dress Barn, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and
Other Options” and ASC 810-10, “Consolidations – Overall” effective July 26,
2009 and ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” effective July 29, 2007) and of our
report dated September 24,
2010 relating to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Dress
Barn, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2010.




/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




New York,
New York


September
24, 2010
International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of 

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December 

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S. 

$1,139 million; 1980$1,152 million; 1981$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs. 

4. Valued at current market exchange rates. 

3.13	 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1 

Millions of dollars, end of period 

2000 2001 

Asset 1997 1998 1999 

Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Junep 

1 Deposits .............................. 457 167 71 104 215 199 196 70 101 86

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 

620,885 

10,763 

607,574 

10,343 

632,482 

9,933 

591,071 594,094 

9,505 9,451 

594,694 

9,397 

603,906 

9,343 

609,440 585,710 

9,289 9,235 

583,655 

9,154 

586,607 

9,100 

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional 3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not 

organizations. included in the gold stock of the United States. 

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury 

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value. 

102
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Fields, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 646]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered January 15, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of seven years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of *People v Behlog*(74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of *344the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision at issue applies only to crimes committed after its effective date *(People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005]). In any event, the amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the new law’s effective date *(People v Walker,*81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]). We also perceive no basis for reducing the sentence on the ground of excessiveness. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
---

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41995
          12
          0
          3
          6
          4
          .055
          -.001
          .011
          .027
          .0161996
          7
          0
          1
          2
          4
          .031
          .000
          .003
          .009
          .0171997
          16
          -1
          0
          3
          14
          .064
          -.003
          -.001
          .010
          .0541998
          6
          -1
          3
          0
          5
          .022
          -.004
          .009
          .000
          .0161999
          15
          0
          3
          5
          7
          .051
          -.001
          .011
          .015
          .0222000
          12
          -12
          3
          8
          14
          .037
          -.037
          .009
          .022
          .0402001
          42
          10
          9
          5
          17
          .123
          .030
          .027
          .014
          .0492002
          35
          8
          6
          5
          16
          .097
          .022
          .017
          .014
          .0412003
          32
          4
          6
          8
          14
          .082
          .010
          .015
          .021
          .0342004
          18
          1
          5
          2
          10
          .044
          .003
          .012
          .005
          .0212005
          17
          2
          11
          4
          0
          .039
          .005
          .024
          .009
          .0002006
          n.a.
          2
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a.
          .003
          n.a.
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2043

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 6, 2001

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ‘‘Elwood Haynes ‘Bud’ Hillis Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2043 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Elwood Haynes

5 ‘Bud’ Hillis Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Elwood Haynes ‘Bud’ Hillis Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
10

A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate Made to FarmersPercent

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 63.1 58.1 71.2 67.3 32.9 61.4 60.6 61.5 69.1 62.2 1997...... 65.8 66.4 73.2 67.8 49.9 64.3 60.1 58.0 68.0 67.0 1998...... 54.4 55.0 59.4 68.5 46.7 42.0 57.6 54.8 62.7 51.1 1999...... 60.7 45.6 66.0 68.6 58.2 52.0 52.6 54.6 60.2 63.1 2000...... 66.9 57.3 60.7 67.0 62.2 76.7 53.4 54.6 61.8 74.5 2001...... 74.5 72.9 65.6 75.0 61.0 80.5 58.8 60.9 69.4 81.5 2002...... 75.1 64.6 65.4 75.8 60.9 84.1 67.8 64.5 68.4 81.2 2003...... 74.3 68.7 59.6 74.6 69.5 86.5 67.6 65.1 63.0 82.1 2004...... 74.3 67.2 47.5 73.4 71.2 91.3 65.8 63.7 63.1 79.9 2005...... 77.1 62.7 71.4 73.0 83.9 90.6 67.6 62.9 65.4 83.2 2006...... 75.3 56.9 68.0 70.4 84.1 91.8 68.7 66.1 65.5 79.8 2007...... 69.6 62.0 62.0 63.5 68.8 88.1 64.3 63.3 66.1 72.0 2004: Q2... 80.5 79.6 52.8 77.7 72.5 94.5 68.5 66.1 67.6 88.9  Q3... 74.5 67.5 48.7 71.0 68.8 92.1 60.5 60.1 60.9 82.0  Q4... 74.1 64.4 34.6 79.7 86.9 91.5 70.1 61.7 61.7 79.2 2005: Q1... 72.7 61.2 73.9 73.5 51.6 83.2 66.7 59.1 64.2 78.1  Q2... 82.7 64.7 78.6 74.9 89.7 95.4 65.8 64.4 69.5 88.9  Q3... 75.3 70.0 70.5 63.3 89.1 88.4 68.5 66.5 61.5 81.4  Q4... 75.4 59.7 65.2 81.5 72.6 87.9 70.3 60.5 66.7 81.1 2006: Q1... 70.5 59.1 71.1 65.7 76.4 90.9 63.9 64.5 62.7 74.0  Q2... 75.9 68.7 69.8 66.0 85.6 90.8 68.8 64.4 70.3 79.4  Q3... 78.3 43.0 64.3 81.2 78.5 96.6 76.9 72.9 62.9 83.5  Q4... 76.6 62.7 67.4 74.9 91.4 87.1 65.4 62.3 65.3 82.9 2007: Q1... 64.6 71.8 68.1 55.8 50.0 87.4 62.6 64.9 70.9 62.9  Q2... 71.4 55.6 75.2 65.5 70.8 90.0 63.9 65.3 71.3 73.3  Q3... 74.8 41.5 75.5 71.7 70.2 89.8 66.2 64.0 61.1 82.8  Q4... 69.1 65.5 43.5 64.6 77.1 86.1 64.6 59.1 61.3 73.1  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-55-PB

Sanford Meekins

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 3, 2008 trial in the above case to allow time to complete

discovery and prepare for trial. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date. 

Accordingly, for the above reasons, the court will continue

the trial from June 3, 2008 to September 3, 2008. In agreeing to

continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00055-PB Document 10 Filed 05/16/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 28, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

August 26, 2008 at 3:15 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 15, 2008

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Robert M. Kinsella, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00055-PB Document 10 Filed 05/16/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32





AMASYS
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Amasys Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








October
      20, 2008/s/
      C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1929 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1929

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native American 
      veteran housing loan pilot program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2001

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. 
   Jefferson, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Bonior, Mr. Carson of 
    Oklahoma, Mr. Baca, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. George Miller of 
California, Mr. Filner, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Ms. Pelosi, 
 and Mr. Condit) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the Native American 
      veteran housing loan pilot program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native American Veterans Home Loan 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NATIVE AMERICAN VETERAN HOUSING LOAN PILOT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 3761(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2001'' and inserting ``2005''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CERTAIN FEDERAL MEMORANDUMS OF 
              UNDERSTANDING.

    Section 3762(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(1)'';
            (2) by striking ``; and'' and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) the tribal organization that has jurisdiction over 
        the veteran has entered into a memorandum of understanding with 
        any department or agency of the United States with respect to 
        direct housing loans to Native Americans that Secretary 
        determines substantially complies with the requirements of 
        subsection (b); and''.
                                 <all>
```