alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2109

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of Virginia Key

Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible inclusion in the National Park System.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2109

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a

special resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in

Biscayne Bay, Florida, for possible inclusion in the National Park System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2109 EH

1 SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

2 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior (in this

3 Act referred to as ‘‘the Secretary’’) shall conduct a study

4 of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida,

5 which was used for recreation by African Americans at

6 a time when public beaches were racially segregated by

7 law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of

8 the site and the suitability and feasibility of establishing

9 the site as a unit of the National Park System.

10 (b) CRITERIA.—In conducting the study required by

11 subsection (a), the Secretary shall use the criteria for the

12 study of areas for potential inclusion in the National Park

13 System contained in section 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16

14 U.S.C. 1a–5; popularly known as the National Park Sys15 tem General Authorities Act).

16 SEC. 2. REPORT.

17 Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall

18 transmit to the Congress a report on the findings of the

19 study and the conclusions and recommendations of the

20 Secretary.

Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-119-02-SM

Carlos Marsach

O R D E R

Defendant's motion to continue the trial for thirty days (document no. 32) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the October trial period. Defendant shall file

a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than September 11, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 33 Filed 08/28/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Change of Plea: September 29, 2009 at 9:30 PM

or:

Final Pretrial Conference: October 14, 2009 at 3:30 PM 

Jury Selection: October 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

August 28, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 33 Filed 08/28/09 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

ISONICS CORPORATION

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

Principal Financial Officer

 

                Tomy knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31,2007, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IsonicsCorporation for the periods presented.

 

December 17,2007

 
| /s/ Kenneth J. Deane                          |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Kenneth J. Deane, Chief Financial Officer and |
| Principal Financial Officer                   |

 

----
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007...... 100.0 3.2 12.3 36.6 29.4 11.8 4.5 2.2 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008...... 100.0 7.4 15.2 35.0 27.0 9.9 3.8 1.6 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.3 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.7 4.6 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.4 6.6 .9 .7  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.6 7.7 1.1 .9 2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 1.5 .3 .2  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 2.5 .6 .3  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 7.6 2.4 .8 .3  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 1.5 1.0 .2  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT AUGUST 31, 1998 AND
THE RESULTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1998 AND IS QUALFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         895,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,162,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                   176,000
<INVENTORY>                                    746,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,782,665
<PP&E>                                       1,535,162
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,166,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,312,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,336,191
<BONDS>                                         82,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,877,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,312,012
<SALES>                                      9,651,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,689,526
<CGS>                                        5,152,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,152,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               537,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                651,129
<INCOME-TAX>                                   121,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            530,129
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   530,129
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001023767
<NAME> MC INFORMATICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,106,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,581,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,896
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,203,732
<PP&E>                                         170,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,436,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,207,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,601,747
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,436,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,968,150
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,252,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               768,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (52,623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,623)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     I, Eugene P. Heytow, Chief Executive Officer of First Oak BrookBancshares, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, based on my knowledge:
 (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to whichthis certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall materials respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.     Dated: March 8, 2004 /S/ EUGENE P. HEYTOW
U.S. Residents' Holdings of Total Foreign Long−Term Securities, December 2023

Billions of U.S. Dollars

No Data

[0,10]

(10,50]

(50,100]

(100,500]

(500,1000]

(1000,2000]

(2000,3000]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 24, 2009

s0217 

# Or der

February 24, 2009

136376

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellant,

v SC: 136376

COA: 272930

Genesee CC: 05

- 081070

- CK

HARLEYSVILLE LAKE STATES

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff

- Cross

- Pl aintiff,

and

SHANNON PITCHER, Personal Representative

of the Estate of PERCY FRANK, Deceased,

and EDGAR FRANK, d/b/a GBS CEMENT &

BLOCK,

Defendants/Cross

- Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 25, 2008

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132521 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132521 COA: 261570 Wayne CC: 04-007893-01 TERI BERNARD TWILLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-111-PB

Shawn Demers

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for March 3, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from March 3, 2009 to May 5, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00111-PB Document 13 Filed 02/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 18, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 20, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 18, 2009

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00111-PB Document 13 Filed 02/18/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Hall,

Plaintiff

v. Case No. 08-cv-465-SM

Kevin Clark,

Defendant

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated April 24, 2009, for the

reasons set forth therein. Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

May 14, 2009 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Kevin Hall, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00465-SM Document 20 Filed 05/14/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jeffrey Gray, et al.

v. Case No. 08-cv-443-PB

 

Lisa Sorenson, et al.

O R D E R

The parties have made it almost impossible for the court to

manage this case by failing to comply with court orders and

constantly shifting the issues that the court is being asked to

decide. I intend to rule on the issues raised by my prior order

before proceeding further. No additional pleadings may be filed

by either party with out prior court approval. 

Document Nos. 137 and 138 are construed as motions and are

denied without prejudice. Document Nos. 139 and 140 are denied

without prejudice. Document No. 141 is moot in light of these

rulings. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

January 18, 2011

cc: Jeffrey Gray, pro se

Janette Gray, pro se

Daniel Lustenberger, Esq.

Scott L. Sorenson, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00443-PB Document 142 Filed 01/18/11 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Cary Ratner

v. Civil No. 08-cv-418-PB

Martel Electronics Corporation

Cary Ratner

v. Civil No. 09-cv-30-JL

M&M Control Services, Inc.

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), the above cases are consolidated for all purposes.

Civil case number 08-cv-418-PB has been designated as the main case. Henceforth, these

consolidated cases shall be considered as one case and all pleadings will be filed in the main case.

They shall be captioned with that case number. The certificate of service shall indicate copies to all

counsel in the main case which shall now include all counsel in the former related cases.

The former related cases shall be statistically closed.

Parties in the former related cases will be added to the main case as consolidated

plaintiffs/defendants, if applicable.

Any motions pending in the former related case are transferred to the main case and refiled

as of this date. Currently pending in the former related case is document number [40] Motion for

Case 1:09-cv-00030-JL Document 42 Filed 03/12/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Summary Judgment, filed by defendant. Mr. Ratner may contact the court or opposing counsel for

copies, if necessary. The deadline for any type of responsive pleading is now April 13, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

March 12, 2009 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Cary Ratner, pro se

Counsel of Record

Case 1:09-cv-00030-JL Document 42 Filed 03/12/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Debra Franchi

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00395-JL

New Hampton School

 SUMMARY ORDER

The plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the amended

complaint (document no. 26) is granted. The scheduling order, to

which the defendant agreed, sets March 1, 2010, as the deadline

for the plaintiff's amendment of pleadings. In light of the

agreed-upon schedule, the fact that the case has been pending for

15 months is immaterial. So the motion, which was filed on

January 8, 2010--almost 2 months before the deadline and some 11

months before the scheduled December 2010 trial--is timely by any

standard.

Further, adding an alternative theory that if the plaintiff

wasn't in fact disabled, then the school "regarded" her as such

does not fundamentally alter how the school would conduct

discovery or defend its case. Any evidence tending to show how

the school "regarded” the plaintiff would seem to be in the

school's possession, not the plaintiff's.

As to the alleged "inconsistency" in the plaintiff's

positions that her eating disorder was disabling yet not serious

enough to justify her expulsion, the court's order on the

Case 1:08-cv-00395-JL Document 28 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
school’s motion to dismiss cited First Circuit authority pointing

out that such a so-called "inconsistency” is present in most

disability cases.

Nonetheless, this ruling is without prejudice to a wellfounded request to extend deadlines, although a continuance does

not appear necessary at this point. 

Within 48 hours counsel shall electronically refile the

pleading attached to the Motion to Amend using the appropriate

event in CMECF. 

SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: January 27, 2010

cc: Donna-Marie Cote, Esq.

Peter E. Hutchins, Esq.

Andrew W. Serell, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00395-JL Document 28 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Mrs. Gertrude HARRIS, Widow of Joseph Dudley, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GRAND LODGE OF KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, etc. (Colored), Defendant and Appellant.*

No. 14523.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 27, 1933.

Frank B. Smith, of New Orleans, for appellant.

John Í. Charbonnet, of New Orleans, for appellee. ’

*

Rehearing denied April 24, 1933.

PEE CUEIAM.

For the reasons assigned in Mrs. Ernestine Flowers, Widow of William Johnson, v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias (La. App.) 146 So. 782, decided by us this, day, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that “the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Georgia Community Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emory B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Elaine S. Kendrick, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|DATE: November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Emory B. Lewis                          
|                        |  |  |  | Emory B. Lewis, President and C.E.O.        
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                        |  | 
|DATE: November 13, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Elaine S. Kendrick                      
|                        |  |  |  | Elaine S. Kendrick, Secretary and Treasurer 
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the
undersigned, Denise Hawkins, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Denise Hawkins 
Denise Hawkins
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  August 15, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.