alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


<PAGE>





               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
First Charter Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of First
Charter Corporation on Form S-3 (No. 333-60641) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-95003, 333-66362, 333-66354, 333-57710, 333-54019, 333-54021, 333-54023,
33-60949, and 333-71497), of our report dated January 15, 2002, except for Note
20, which is as of February 28, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of First Charter Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2001, included in the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Charter
Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Charlotte, North Carolina
March 15, 2002
Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS   Document 672    Filed 04/04/11   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cr-00189-GZS   Document 672    Filed 04/04/11   Page 2 of 2
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary F. Kimmons, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: March 25, 2003                   /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

tIxmrable !I!. D. SmaLng 

Count3 Attorwy 

&maPord County 

+Mmnan, %x88 

s3ar sir: 

it is wver proper 

thaA OAO bI%Ad 

brand of reaordr 

recor&~Jn thb County i?hme they ara to kept, so he 

desiras \t.hs Clerk t3 r653M thlo brand LXI hla 38%~ 

also. k.J' 

Y 4 . . 4 . 

krticls 6iS90, W&~od Civtt 3tatutas, proviCes as 

~ollowus I 

"Zvery person who Sss cattle, hog*, sheep or 

Goats 3nnl.l have an ear aark and brand c.LiM’ariq 
.* 

xeo 

“P9’L 

: .;:; :, 

.A..~ 

;.. 

.-- -0; 

30 

iionorable 2. 0, Ssnslag, pa&e 2 

Pran t& aa~ lpark aad broad of hi8 neighbors, Uhlah 

eer m.vk and brend shall be reoorded by the oountg clerk of the aounty where rush anla~ls 8hell be. 

Xc parson 8hall u8e more then one bmnd, but ney 

raoorc? hfa brand in as many aountles OS b desnu 

naaerrary.” .I 

Artlola 1484, Penal Code, provfdust 

‘Uhoe~ec In cniginally branding or marcattle uses mra t&m oaa mark or brand 8hall be 

ff.aad AOt b88 th8~ tVluaty-iiT AOF IPDCW thin op4 

l”luadrsd dollars Par each aDIme SO braided or marked.” 

These statutes contemplate, end here boon so conatrued by our ooucts, that a pareon YJ ~88 or record for u8e 

only ona brand. Tumor Y. stew 39 Cr. 8. 322, 45 9. If. 10201 

irnsal~. state, 39 Cr. R. 330, 4s 3. Y. 1022. The Texas 

ho~u~ts have held, hovevar, that there statut.8 Vera not &- 

tended to pm3vaat an ovaac 0S llvsstoak Sor good aau8e from 

dimlgag his brand. pbclura v. Sheak’r Dalrs, t% Tax. 426, 4 

9. Y. 5521 Dugat v.'Wlth, 67 Cr. Ii4 46, 148 3. Ii. 769. 

?ha parsoa, aoc4ordlng to your lattor.Pra3 vbioll vv 

Leta heretoPore quoted, .daafre8 to u8a UAQ to rceoo~d for u8a 

&ore thsa aae brand. 

Ye, thervrore, anaver your query In the negativv. 

Since you rsquast OUT anaver to your related qwstio;l 

onl3 If vu reached a conalusioa dlffarant to that as VW have 

above axpmsseA, it thus become8 unnecessary to render an Op&nion thereon.
17

A.12. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Large Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, May 7-11, 2007Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,002,630 16,396 106,078 449,040 221,511 47,356 16,42Number of loans 20,576 572 2,351 9,651 4,074 735 9Weighted average maturity (months)1 20.60 8.92 23.69 18.37 17.96 11.14 32.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 8.32 4.45 9.38 7.59 1.72 .85 14.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.21 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate 4 8.48 8.36 8.18 8.54 8.46 8.67 8.7

 Standard error5 .11 .26 .26 .18 .20 .29 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 9.34 9.69 9.30 9.37 9.34 9.11 9. 25th percentile 7.71 7.12 7.30 7.84 7.50 7.76 7.7 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.72 9.17 9.56 8.40 8.59 8.95 n Other livestock 8.16 8.60 8.70 8.94 7.50 7.12 9.4 Other current operating expenses7 8.86 7.83 8.73 8.96 8.88 8.76 9.

 Farm machinery and equipment 8.66 6.71 8.02 8.48 9.20 10.58 n Farm real estate 8.00 n.a. 7.84 8.05 8.65 n.a. 8.2 Other8 7.90 7.97 6.68 7.82 8.20 8.90 8.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 79.38 17.66 61.87 78.78 94.23 85.71 92.5 Under commitment 75.95 95.93 68.52 79.39 96.44 83.62 67.4 Callable 20.89 65.72 29.89 24.15 10.58 8.07 52.5 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.95 38.30 9.36 4.13 1.70 .43 n Other livestock 4.96 1.73 6.20 2.87 10.28 7.37 19. Other current operating expenses7 47.01 56.54 44.74 49.34 35.93 74.30 .4 Farm machinery and equipment 8.36 .21 4.96 11.65 7.79 .34 n Farm real estate 8.41 n.a. 10.20 11.11 1.20 n.a. 12.9 Other8 26.32 3.22 24.53 20.91 43.10 17.57 67.4

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 13.64 15.37 14.38 13.79 7.83 13.90 32.5 Other 82.45 83.79 83.53 80.55 90.77 84.14 67.4 Note. Most large farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had more than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2093

For the relief of Rodney E. Hoover.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mrs. CAPPS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Rodney E. Hoover.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IN GENERAL.

4 The United States District Court for the Eastern

5 District of California shall have jurisdiction to hear, deter6 mine, and render judgment on any claim of or on behalf

7 of Rodney E. Hoover of Arroyo Grande, California,

8 against the United States for personal injuries which he

9 allegedly sustained in an accident on February 26, 1940,

10 and in transport on March 4, 1940, while a member of

11 the Civilian Conservation Corps in Beaver City, Nebraska.
2

•HR 2093 IH

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER PROVISIONS.

2 Solely for the purposes of establishing jurisdiction

3 under section 1346(b) of title 28, United States Code, the

4 events giving rise to the alleged injuries referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to have occurred after January 1,

6 1945.

7 SEC. 3. TIME LIMITATION.

8 Any claim under this Act shall be barred unless it

9 is filed with the appropriate Federal agency pursuant to

10 section 2675 of title 28, United States Code, within six

11 months after the date of enactment of this Act, and such

12 claim, if so filed, shall be considered to have been filed

13 in a timely manner notwithstanding the time limitation of

14 section 2401 of such title.

15 SEC. 4. LIABILITY.

16 Nothing in this Act shall be construed as an inter17 ference or admission of liability by the United States.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director

July 22, 2008

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### GIBSON v. GEORGE DOUNSON, INC.

No. 14544.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 12, 1933.

L. W. Coekfield, of New Orleans, for appellant George Dounson, Inc.

Dan A. McGovern, Jr., of New Orleans, foi-appellant Hilda Augustin Gibson.

Warren M. Simon, of New Orleans, for ap pellee Mary Zenor Gibson.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

The plaintiff in this suit, Mary Zenor, widow of Victor Gibson, claims compensation from the defendant, George Dounson, Inc., for-the death of her son, Joseph Gibson. Hilda. Augustin also brought suit against the defendant claiming compensation for the death of Joseph Gibson on behalf of herself as widow of Gibson and of her daughter, Hilda Au-gustin Gibson, as appears by the proceedings entitled Hilda Augustin Gibson vs. George Dounson, Inc., et al., No. 199115 of the docket of the civil district eourt. The present suit was allotted to division B, and the wife’s- suit to division E of the civil district court, but both were consolidated for the purpose of trial in division B, where, after hearing, the lower court rendered judgment in favor of the mother, plaintiff herein, for compensation at the rate of $3 per week for three hundred weeks with legal interest from the due date of each installment, and for the further sum of $150 for funeral expenses. The suit of the wife was dismissed upon the ground that she was not dependent upon Joseph Gibson at *8741 the time of his death, but was living apart from him' and with an individual by the name of George Nickles, whose illegitimate child, Hilda Nickles, was a coplaintiff under the name of Hilda Augustin Gibson.

The defendant’s attitude towards both claimants was and is that of stakeholder, the liability for compensation being admitted. The wife and daughter appealed from the adverse judgment, and in order to preserve its rights in the premises the defendant appealed from the judgment awarding the mother compensation, the one now before us. . .

When the wife’s appeal reached this court, it was, by proper motion, dismissed. Hilda Augustin Gibson v. George Dounson, Inc., 147 So. 370.

The appeal of the wife and daughter having been dismissed by this court, the effect is the same as though no appeal had been taken from the judgment dismissing their suit, which is now final.

The judgment in favor of the mother will, therefore, be affirmed.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed, at the cost of defendant.'

Affirmed.
Case 1:08-cv-00120-WES Document 81 Filed 09/16/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. 06-cr-211-01-JD

Peter St. Croix

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

8) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3131(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: December 28, 2006

cc: Joseph Caulfield, Esq.

Karin M. Eckel, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:06-cr-00211-JD Document 9 Filed 12/28/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential Acquisition Fund I, L.P.
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000717319
<NAME>              Prudential Acquisition Fund I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1996

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1996

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          928,108

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   799,852

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,727,960

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,727,960

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           539,826

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,188,134

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,727,960

<SALES>                         5,474,835

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,474,835

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,249,665

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    3,225,170

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   42.53

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 24-2008]


Foreign-Trade Zone 161--Sedgwick County, KS; Amendment to 
Application for Subzone Status; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Aircraft 
Manufacturing), Wichita and Salina, KS

    A request has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) by Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (HBC) to amend the company's 
application requesting special-purpose subzone status for the company's 
aircraft manufacturing facilities located in Wichita and Salina, 
Kansas.
    HBC is now requesting to correct the HTSUS number for the finished 
product as described in the original Federal Register notice (Docket 
24-2008, 73 FR 21903-21904, 4/23/08) to accurately reflect the category 
of aircraft that are produced at the company's facilities. The correct 
HTSUS number should be 8802.30 (airplanes and other aircraft of an 
unladen weight exceeding 2,000 kg but not exceeding 15,000 kg). There 
is no change to the duty rate (duty-free) and the finished products 
will be manufactured using the same imported parts and components 
(duty-free to 15 percent) as described in the original Federal Register 
notice.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the address listed below. The closing period for their 
receipt is October 27, 2008. Rebuttal comments in response to material 
submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the 
subsequent 15-day period (to November 10, 2008).
    A copy of the application amendment will be available at each of 
the following addresses: U.S. Department of Commerce Export Assistance 
Center, 150 North Main Street, Suite 200, Wichita, Kansas; and, Office 
of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20230. For further information contact Christopher Kemp at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#412229332832352e312924331e2a242c31012835206f252e226f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="36555e445f454259465e5344695d535b46765f42571852595518515940">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0862.

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22716 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures Year
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total1983
          1
          1
          2
          3
          71984
          3
          7
          10
          12
          321985
          12
          21
          17
          18
          681986
          14
          14
          21
          16
          651987
          22
          19
          12
          16
          691988
          11
          6
          12
          7
          361989
          5
          7
          5
          5
          221990
          3
          5
          6
          3
          171991
          2
          2
          3
          1
          81992
          1
          1
          1
          4
          71993
          1
          2
          2
          0
          51994
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01995
          0
          0
          0
          0
          01996
          0
          2
          0
          0
          21997
          0
          0
          0
          1
          11998
          0
          0
          1
          0
          11999
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12000
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02001
          0
          0
          0
          0
          02002
          1
          0
          0
          1
          22003
          0
          1
          0
          0
          12004
          0
          1
          0
          n.a.
          n.a. Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.
Industrial banks and mutual savings banks also are
excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: December 31, 2004
<Page>


                                                                        Ex. 31.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    I, Andrew Benson, certify that:

    1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DataMEG Corp., for
the year ended December 31, 2003;

    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

    4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: December 31, 2003.


/s/ Andrew Benson
---------------------
By:  Andrew Benson
President and Principal Financial Officer