alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of United Diagnostic, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, J. Marvin Feigenbaum, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
Board, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: February 16, 2005                 By: /s/ J. Marvin Feigenbaum
                                             ------------------------
                                             J. Marvin Feigenbaum
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                             Financial Officer and Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02263-LTB

PETER GEORGACARAKOS,

Applicant,

v.

CHARLES DANIELS,

Respondent.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

Applicant’s “Motion for Reconsideration” (Doc. #15) filed on December 21, 2011,

is DENIED.

Dated: January 3, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02263-LTB Document 16 Filed 01/03/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Daniel L. Scharre, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Larscom Incorporated;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
               a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
               b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report, based on such evaluation; and
               c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
               a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
               b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 11, 2003   By: /s/ Daniel L. Scharre    Chief Executive Officer
| Period  | Minneapolis - Other operating loans | Minneapolis - Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Minneapolis - Long-term real estate loans | Kansas City - Other operating loans | Kansas City - Intermediate non-real-estate loans | Kansas City - Long-term real estate loans |
|---------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| 2001:Q1 | 9.7                                 | 9.59                                             | 9.13                                      | .                                   | .                                                | .                                         |
| 2001:Q2 | 9.25                                | 9.13                                             | 8.49                                      | .                                   | .                                                | .                                         |
| 2001:Q3 | 8.75                                | 8.69                                             | 8.08                                      | .                                   | .                                                | .                                         |
| 2001:Q4 | 7.9                                 | 7.71                                             | 7.22                                      | .                                   | .                                                | .                                         |
| 2002:Q1 | 7.43                                | 7.45                                             | 7.01                                      | .                                   | .                                                | .                                         |
| 2002:Q2 | 7.2                                 | 7.19                                             | 6.81                                      | 7.65                                | 7.57                                             | 7.06                                      |
| 2002:Q3 | 6.81                                | 6.74                                             | 6.36                                      | 7.51                                | 7.43                                             | 6.85                                      |
| 2002:Q4 | 6.68                                | 6.64                                             | 6.25                                      | 7.15                                | 7.04                                             | 6.61                                      |
| 2003:Q1 | 6.46                                | 6.41                                             | 6.13                                      | 9.73                                | 6.92                                             | 6.44                                      |
Amendment to Agreement for Retail dated July 29, 2003



 Exhibit 10.23 
  

			
	[LOGO OF GLOBAL CROSSING]	 	Contract Reference Number: 4701

  
 This offer is voidable
by Global Crossing if not signed by Customer and returned to Global Crossing by August 30, 2003. 
  
 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR RETAIL UNITED STATES SERVICES 
  
 This is an Amendment to the Retail Competitive Services Agreement (“Agreement”) between Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., located at 1080
Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford, NY 14534 (“Global Crossing”) and Callwave located at 136 West Canon Perdido Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (the “Customer”): 
  
 1. Except as otherwise stated, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 2. Customer agrees that the Initial Term of this Agreement shall remain the same. 

 
 3. Global Crossing agrees to extend to Customer certain modified pricing reflected in
Attachment 2 of the Initial Agreement. Attachment 2 attached hereto and made a part hereof the former Attachment 2. Attachment 2 includes modified pricing for Canadian Origination. Customer agrees to such modified pricing and agrees to make this
Amendment part of the Agreement. 
  
 4. The Monthly Minimum Charge under the
Agreement shall remain the same. 
  
 5. The remainder of the Agreement and any
other modifications thereto executed in writing between the Parties are not modified by this Amendment and remain in full force and effect. 
  
 6. This Amendment is binding on Global Crossing only on the date that it is signed by the executive who has authority for special pricing within Global Crossing’s
Business Services Division corporate staff. 
  

							
	 Callwave
	    	 Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.

				
	 By:
	 	 /s/    DAVID S. TRANDAL

	    	 By:
	 	 /s/    SCOTT HENRY


				
	 Printed Name:
	 	 David S. Trandal

	    	 Printed Name:
	 	 Scott Henry


				
	 Title:
	 	 Vice-President Operations

	    	 Title:
	 	 Manager Special Pricing


				
	 Date:
	 	 7/29/03

	    	 Date:
	 	 7/29/03



  
 Account Number: 0204134161

  

 1 
 GLOBAL CROSSING/CUSTOMER—CONFIDENTIAL 
  
 © GlobalCrossing2001 
 DE 07/18/03 









					
	[LOGO OF GLOBAL CROSSING]	 	Attachment 2	 	 
	 	 	Page 1 of 1	 	 
	Approved pricing for: Callwave	 	 	 	Contract Reference Number: 4701

  
 This offer is voidable
by Global Crossing if not signed by Customer and returned to Global Crossing by August 30, 2003 
  
 Canadian Origination 
  

																									
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 
		 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 	Dedicated Base
Rate	 
 	 	Approved
Discount	 
 	 	Dedicated
Net Rate	 
 	 	 	 	 	Switched Base
Rate	 
 	 	Approved
Discount	 
 	 	Switched
Net Rate	 
 	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	[*]	 	 	[*]	 	 	[*]	 	 	 	 	 	[*]	 	 	[*]	 	 	[*]	 	 	 
	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	
	 	 	 

  
 1.) The above rates do
not include local access, taxes and/or surcharges. 
  
  
 Customer Initials: /s/ DT 
  
 Global Crossing Initials: /s/ SH 
  
 [*] Confidential treatment has been requested for the bracketed portions. The confidential redacted portion has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




November 14, 2008


                                    /s/ RICHARD J.  LAMPEN
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard J. Lampen
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Adam H. Nagle

v. Civil No. 08-cv-445-JL

NH State Prison

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated February 17, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

March 13, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Adam H. Nagle, Pro se

Deborah B. Weissbard, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00445-JL Document 19 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 1
Order entered July 30. 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00436-CV

HOLLY BONE A/K/A HOLLY MARTIN, Appellant

V.

DAVID TYLER MOSS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09893

ORDER

On July 23, 2021, a sealed supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing 

the trial court’s January 22, 2021 “Ex Parte and Under Seal Omnibus Orders for

Issuance of Post-Judgment Writs of Garnishment.” The record before this Court, 

however, does not contain a sealing order allowing the supplemental clerk’s record 

to be filed under seal. Accordingly, we will temporarily seal the supplemental 

clerk’s record for FORTY DAYS to allow the parties to obtain an order from the 

trial court sealing the supplemental clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a.
The parties shall provide, within forty days of the date of this order, written 

verification whether the trial court signed a sealing order. If the trial court does not 

sign a sealing order within the time prescribed, the Court will vacate the portion of 

this order temporarily sealing the supplemental clerk’s record.

If the trial court signs a sealing order, we ORDER Dallas County District 

Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, within forty-five days of the date of this order, a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the sealing order.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Martin Hoffman, Presiding Judge of the 68th Judicial District Court;

Ms. Pitre; and, the parties.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, May 2-6, 2005Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not ratVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 1,641,000 60,700 171,103 665,968 559,248 51,857 15,8Number of loans 36,797 2,126 6,138 15,313 6,119 1,128 1,02Weighted average maturity (months)1 22.31 12.83 12.97 16.54 27.50 27.78 34.

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 4.63 8.51 6.03 3.30 4.08 4.25 19.

Weighted average risk rating3 3.25 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n

Weighted average interest rate4 6.59 6.89 6.99 6.38 6.53 7.28 7. Standard error5 .17 .27 .22 .21 .27 .30 .4

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.25 7.52 7.83 7.19 7.12 8.12 7.7 25th percentile 5.90 6.72 6.18 5.64 6.01 6.32 7.0 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.53 7.28 6.30 6.57 6.43 9.18 6.9 Other livestock 6.77 6.84 7.23 6.32 6.26 8.65 7. Other current operating expenses7 6.84 7.01 7.35 6.50 6.95 6.96 7.

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.84 6.34 7.52 6.80 6.81 6.65 7. Farm real estate 6.84 6.65 7.08 6.78 6.90 6.25 8. Other8 6.09 5.29 6.16 5.81 6.13 7.72 7.

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 81.59 51.13 52.82 82.18 96.71 90.38 52. Under commitment 77.83 70.46 73.25 81.15 80.19 79.87 46. Callable 22.01 24.71 23.91 15.99 22.76 44.75 22.7 Subject to prepayment penalty 4.08 .03 3.97 .91 9.34 3.63 n Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 8.99 8.77 28.88 11.29 2.24 .30 2.5 Other livestock 4.53 16.11 5.45 3.22 3.37 6.49 27. Other current operating expenses7 38.11 49.14 52.83 39.93 26.58 56.42 40. Farm machinery and equipment 13.03 6.63 4.05 16.34 13.93 7.31 3.9 Farm real estate 6.66 19.23 5.42 3.35 9.62 .02 5.4 Other8 28.68 .11 3.37 25.86 44.26 29.47 20.5

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 10.57 17.72 9.94 7.53 11.09 18.65 35. Other 80.49 81.20 87.02 84.82 74.17 79.54 64. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,599
<PP&E>                                          22,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            80
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,858
<SALES>                                          3,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,839
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,050)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,056
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
216 La. 236

#### STATE v. NEWMAN.

No. 39582.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1949.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herve Racivitch, Dist. Atty., Girard J. Fernandez, Asst. Dist. Atty.; William J. Wegmann, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for appellant.

Aubrey C. Evans, New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Defendant John H. Newman was charged in a bill of information with the offense of illegal carrying of weapons, as denounced by Paragraph 1 of Article 95 of the Louisiana Criminal Code. A motion to quash this bill, filed by defendant on the ground that it did not charge a crime known to the laws of this state, was sustained by the trial juc’ge, and the State applied for, and was granted, an appeal to this court.

The article of the Criminal Code under which the defendant was charged provides: “Whoever commits the crime of illegal carrying of weapons shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both.”

Article 7, Section 10, of the Constitution, provides' that the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court shall extend to criminal cases on questions’of law alone whenever the penalty of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be imposed; or where a fine exceeding $300-00 or imprisonment exceeding. six months has been actually imposed.

The penalty of death or imprisonment at hard labor may not be imposed in this case, and, since no trial or conviction was had in the lower court, the defendant has not been sentenced to pay any fine, nor has he been ordered imprisoned. Under these facts, this court is without appellate jurisdiction, and it is our constitutional duty to take notice ex proprio motu of this lack of jurisdiction.

In cases of this kind, this court has consistently refused' to take appellate jurisdiction. See State v. Mack Smith et al., 39 La.Ann. 231, 1 So. 452; State v. B. F. Smith, 39 La.Ann. 320, 1 So. 867; State v. Blanchard, 45 La.Ann. 939, 12 So. 933; State v. Kramer, 127 La. 1033, 54 So. 341; State v. Moore et al., 140 La. 722, 73 So. *594842; State v. Johnson, 176 La. 371, 145 So. 733; State v. Lejeune, 205 La. 708, 18 So.2d 33.

A reading- of the penal provision of Article 95 reveals that, even if defendant had been tried and given the maximum sentence, we should still be without appellate jurisdiction since no fine exceeding $300.00 or imprisonment exceeding six months can be actually imposed.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GREGORY KURC, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-3047

LT Case No. 2020-DR-3805

ANDREA COMPTON, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed May 3, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Marion County, 

Ann Melinda Craggs, Judge. 

Gregory Kurc, Ocklawaha, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 836 

Granting the authority provided under clause 4(c)(3) of rule X of the Rules 

of the House of Representatives to the Committee on Education and 

Labor for purposes of its investigation into the deaths of 9 individuals 

that occurred at the Crandall Canyon Mine near Huntington, Utah. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2007 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Granting the authority provided under clause 4(c)(3) of rule 

X of the Rules of the House of Representatives to the 

Committee on Education and Labor for purposes of its 

investigation into the deaths of 9 individuals that occurred at the Crandall Canyon Mine near Huntington, 

Utah. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. GRANTING INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY TO 

3 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR. 

4 The Committee on Education and Labor is granted 

5 the authority provided under clause 4(c)(3) of rule X of 

6 the Rules of the House of Representatives in furtherance 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 836 IH 

1 of the investigation by such Committee into the deaths of 

2 9 individuals that occurred during August 2007 at the 

3 Crandall Canyon Mine (also known as the Genwal Mine) 

4 near Huntington, Utah, including the events that may 

5 have led to those deaths and into the administration of 

6 relevant laws by government agencies, including the De7 partment of Labor and the Mine Safety and Health Ad8 ministration, and into other related matters. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS