alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF MERIDIAN NATIONAL CORPORATION AS OF
FEBRUARY 28, 1999 AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         825,437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,021,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                   448,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,281,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,851,829
<PP&E>                                       7,094,339
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,514,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,122,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,992,947
<BONDS>                                      4,822,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,175,320
<COMMON>                                        37,176
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,252,522)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,122,626
<SALES>                                     49,291,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,291,003
<CGS>                                       45,317,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,317,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (226,672)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,720,719
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,533,982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,533,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,533,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.54)


</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS

TERENCE J. HANKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN E. HUSBAND, Individually and as Manager,

LITTLE SNAKE RESOURCE AREA, U.S. BLM, and

AXIS STEEL, INC.,

Defendants. 

ORDER FOR SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer 

This civil action came before the court for a preliminary Scheduling Conference

on January 5, 2012, at which Plaintiff, Mr. Hankins, clarified that he intended to sue the

Bureau of Land Management, Little Snake Resource Area (“BLM”). Pursuant to the

Order of Reference dated October 21, 2011 (Doc. # 9), this case was referred to the

Magistrate Judge. On September 6, 2011, the court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed

in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (See Doc. # 3). It is now

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall attempt to obtain a waiver of service

from Defendant Bureau of Land Management, Little Snake Resource Area, 458

Emerson St., Craig, CO 81625. If the Clerk is unable to do so, the United States

Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint (Doc. # 1) and summons upon Defendant

BLM. If appropriate, the Marshal shall first attempt to obtain a waiver of service of

these documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). All costs of service shall be

Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS Document 29 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
2

advanced by the United States. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that after service of process, Defendant BLM shall

respond to the Complaint (Doc. # 1) as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. 

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 5th day of January, 2012. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Craig B. Shaffer 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS Document 29 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS

Terence Hankins 

Prisoner No. 147323

Sterling Correctional Facility

PO Box 6000

Sterling, CO 80751

US Marshal Service

Service Clerk

Service forms for: Bureau of Land Management

United States Attorney

District of Colorado

DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY - VIA EMAIL

Nathalie Erin Cohen

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Untied States Attorney’s Office

District of Colorado

DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY

Chad Michael McShane

Attorney at Law

Robinson, Waters & O’Dorisio, P.C.

DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY

Zachary Paul Mugge

Attorney at Law

Robinson, Waters & O’Dorisio, P.C.

DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY

I hereby certify that I have mailed a copy of the ORDER to the above-named

individuals, and the following forms to the United States Marshal Service for service of

process on Bureau of Land Management; and to the United States Attorney’s Office:

COMPLAINT FILED 08/24/11, SUMMONS, AND NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE on January 11, 2012.

GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK

By: s/A. García

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM-CBS Document 29 Filed 01/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 21.1**

 
**Exhibit 21.1****Subsidiaries of the Registrant**     The following table sets forth the subsidiaries of First Charter Corporation at December 31, 2006.       **Subsidiary** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation** **Note**First Charter Bank North Carolina    Gwinnett Banking Company Georgia  (1)First Charter Insurance Services, Inc. North Carolina  (2)First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. North Carolina  (3)First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. Virginia  (4)First Charter Realty Investments, Inc. Delaware  (5)First Charter Real Estate Holdings, LLC North Carolina  (6)FCB Real Estate, Inc. North Carolina  (6)Lincoln Center at Mallard Creek, LLC North Carolina  (7) (1) Gwinnett Banking Company was merged into First CharterBank, effective March 1, 2007 (2) Owned by First Charter Bank (3) Primarily owned by First Charter Bank (4) Owned by First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. (5) Primarily owned by First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. (6) Primarily owned by First Charter Realty Investments, Inc. (7) 51 percent owned by First Charter Bank
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. Civil No. 07-cv-380-SM

Larry Blaisdell, Warden,

Northern New Hampshire Correctional Facility

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Order of

Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February 25, 2008. The motion for injunctive relief

is denied.

SO ORDERED.

March12, 2008 _________________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00380-SM Document 8 Filed 03/12/08 Page 1 of 1
0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

Foreign Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

Advanced Market Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities1

1. Advanced market economy definitions from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

Emerging Market Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities1

1. Emerging market economy definitions from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

European Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

Asian Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

North American Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities
0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

South American Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

Oceanian Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Monthly

Billions of U.S. dollars

 

LT Treasuries Agency Bonds Corporate/Other Bonds Corporate Stocks

African Residents' Holdings of U.S. Long−Term Securities
---

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks Year
                  Estimated volume (billions of dollars)
                  Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent)Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q4
                  Total
                  Q1
                  Q2
                  Q3
                  Q41995
          51
          -2
          14
          13
          25
          .131
          -.004
          .039
          .032
          .0611996
          95
          16
          27
          24
          30
          .240
          .039
          .070
          .058
          .0711997
          93
          6
          19
          19
          50
          .230
          .014
          .049
          .045
          .1121998
          87
          4
          15
          24
          45
          .198
          .008
          .036
          .051
          .0951999
          126
          18
          37
          35
          36
          .280
          .040
          .086
          .078
          .0802000
          108
          11
          17
          34
          45
          .259
          .027
          .041
          .075
          .0982001
          308
          67
          53
          140
          48
          .656
          .142
          .118
          .294
          .1012002
          221
          40
          50
          58
          73
          .471
          .085
          .114
          .124
          .1572003
          175
          34
          35
          48
          58
          .382
          .074
          .080
          .108
          .1282004
          129
          28
          17
          46
          38
          .284
          .062
          .039
          .099
          .0812005
          59
          8
          16
          12
          24
          .124
          .017
          .035
          .026
          .0482006
          73
          9
          7
          23
          34
          .146
          .018
          .015
          .045
          .064 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.


Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: April 09, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven A. Swan

v.

U.S. Attorney General

No. 07-fp-112

O R D E R

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted,

but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended, the filing fee must

be paid as follows: the sum of $56.00 is due no later than May

20, 2007. In addition, 20% of each preceding month’s income

credited to plaintiff’s account to be remitted by the Federal

Medical Center-Devens when the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 until the sum of $350.00 has been paid. Failure to pay

the fee as ordered will result in dismissal of the action without

prejudice. In all other respects plaintiff’s request for in

forma pauperis has been granted.

This case has been assigned civil number 07-cv-112-SM.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 27, 2007

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

Bonnie S. Reed, Financial Administrator

Federal Medical Center-Devens, Inmate Accounts

Case 1:07-cv-00112-SM Document 3 Filed 04/27/07 Page 1 of 1
15

A.10. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Size of LoaPercent except as noted

$1,000 to $10,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $100,000 t

Loan characteristic All sizes $9,999 $24,999 $49,999 $99,999 $249,999 Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 533,401 18,067 46,313 42,382 52,764 107,74Number of loans 9,346 3,187 2,872 1,263 792 73Weighted average maturity (months)1 26.58 10.02 14.93 19.09 23.69 40.8

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 12.86 7.24 11.08 12.33 14.66 17.3

Weighted average risk rating3 2.28 2.37 2.21 2.59 2.49 2.4

Weighted average interest rate4 7.51 8.48 8.04 7.73 7.52 7.5

 Standard error5 .17 .31 .17 .21 .23 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 8.24 9.46 8.57 8.30 8.06 8.2 25th percentile 6.93 7.51 7.48 7.20 6.70 6.9 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 6.93 8.76 7.71 7.60 n.a. 7.6 Other livestock 8.08 9.44 7.92 8.04 8.30 8.3 Other current operating expenses7 7.61 8.19 8.09 7.58 7.28 7.6

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.94 8.48 8.11 8.14 8.83 6.9 Farm real estate 7.35 n.a. 7.79 8.16 7.49 7.5 Other8 6.56 12.75 8.14 7.38 7.32 4.8

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 42.74 27.45 28.83 35.70 31.03 52.6 Under commitment 44.71 59.05 57.29 36.51 33.26 50.0 Callable 29.68 9.76 6.74 22.79 16.46 12.9 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 9.20 6.95 11.22 4.24 n.a. 7.7 Other livestock 7.71 14.46 7.99 8.59 7.55 16.3 Other current operating expenses7 64.72 68.60 63.81 55.15 69.63 52.2

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.92 9.20 14.03 13.41 9.34 6.9 Farm real estate 5.76 n.a. .77 9.21 7.31 11.8 Other8 7.69 .79 2.18 9.40 6.17 4.9

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 21.50 2.77 4.11 9.18 23.24 29.7 Other 74.43 93.55 93.77 85.14 69.31 70.2 Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                 ------------

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
               ------------------------------------------------
                      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                      ----------------------------------
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      ---------------------------------

      In connection with the  Annual Report of Carrington  Laboratories, Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006  as
 filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I Robert
 W. Schnitzius, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to
 18 U.S. C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained  in the Report  fairly presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the
 Company.


 Date:     April 2, 2007



 /s/ Robert W. Schnitzius
 ------------------------
 Chief Financial Officer
|                                         |   | State      of   |   | Percentage of Voting Securities |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   | Incorporation   |   | Owned By Registrant                            |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |
| Value      Line Publishing, Inc.             |   | New      York   |   |                                           | 100%   |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |   |
| Compupower      Corporation                  |   | Delaware        |   |                                           | 100%   |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |   |
| EULAV      Securities, Inc.                  |   | New      York   |   |                                           | 100%   |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |   |
| The      Vanderbilt Advertising Agency, Inc. |   | New      York   |   |                                           | 100%   |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |   |
| Value      Line Distribution Center, Inc.    |   | New      Jersey |   |                                           | 100%   |   |
|                                         |   |            |   |                                           |   |   |
| EULAV      Asset Management, LLC             |   | Delaware        |   |                                           | 100%   |   |

----
No. 72-1264.

#### Mayor of Philadelphia *v.*Educational Equality League et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondents to dispense with printing response and certiorari granted.
1

 “[#41]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a

specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this

convention throughout this order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02192-REB-CBS

MARJORIE A. KESSLING, and

TRENTON H. PARKER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BETHANY SALZMAN, individually and in her official capacity, and

GARY SCHWARTZ, individually and his official capacity,

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the following: (1) plaintiff Trenton H. Parker’s Motion

To Dismiss Plaintiff Kessling From This Case [#41]1

 filed January 8, 2013; and (2)

the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] filed January 16,

2013. I approve and adopt the recommendation and grant the motion to dismiss plaintiff

Marjorie Kessling.

The plaintiffs are acting pro se. Therefore, I construe their filings generously and

with the leniency due pro se litigants, see Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S.

Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076

(10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Belmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v.

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972)). 

Case 1:11-cv-02192-REB-CBS Document 48 Filed 09/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

 This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.

2

Because no party filed an objection to the recommendation, I review it only for

plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418

F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).2

 Finding no error, much less plain error, I find and

conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted as an order of this

court. 

As noted by the magistrate judge, the motion to dismiss plaintiff, Marjorie

Kessling, was filed by her co-plaintiff, Trenton Parker. Ms. Kessling appeared at a

scheduling conference and asked that she be dismissed from this case. No party has

objected to the dismissal of Ms. Kessling from this case. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] filed

January 16, 2013, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That the Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Kessling From This Case [#41] filed

January 8, 2013, by plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, is GRANTED;

3. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), the claims of plaintiff, Marjorie A.

Kessling, are DISMISSED; and

4. That plaintiff, Marjorie A. Kessling, is DROPPED as a party to this case, and

the caption shall be AMENDED accordingly.

Dated September 18, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Case 1:11-cv-02192-REB-CBS Document 48 Filed 09/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7595

MUHAMMAD AL-MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES; 

MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its 

official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (9:14-cv-01266-BHH)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, 

DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Al-Mujahidin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion 

for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Al-Mujahidin seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED