alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         321,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,435,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (251,393)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,789,764
<PP&E>                                         456,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,634)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,309,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,941,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,432,257
<COMMON>                                     4,206,890
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,271,486)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,309,435
<SALES>                                      1,394,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,394,754
<CGS>                                        1,453,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,453,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               792,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (888,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (890,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (890,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**EDWIN BAEZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 91 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 27th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Leav e to File Petition for** 

**Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thousand Trails, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bryan
D. Reed, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

May 13, 2003

/s/ Bryan D. Reed

Bryan D. Reed
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the SEC or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In re: Dominik Wienski

Case No. 08-mc-32

ORDER RE: DISPOSITION OF SEALED CASE

Pursuant to the court’s order dated December 1, 2008, the aforementioned case sealed deadline was

extended. The seal on this case expired February 26, 2009. 

IT IS ORDERED THAT unless a response is filed within thirteen workdays requesting an

alternative form of disposition, the case will be unsealed.

SO ORDERED.

March 3, 2009 /s/James R. Muirhead 

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

Case 1:08-mc-00032-JM Document 5 Filed 03/03/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0001023877
<NAME>                      Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                            US Dollars

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                1
<CASH>                                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                      23
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (23)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   0
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               0
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              53532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (53532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (53532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (53532)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.03)



</TABLE>
exv10w1w1



 





Exhbit 10.1.1




APPENDIX E




Section 6.7(a)(i) — List of Investment Funds Available Under the Plan





	E.1 	 	The following Investment Funds are presently available under the Plan
with respect to the Accounts noted.
	 
	 	 	Deferrals, the Cooper Bearing Transfer Accounts, any Transfer or Rollover
Accounts, the portion of the Employer Contributions, Employer Prior
Contributions, and Participant Contributions Accounts eligible for the
“age 55” rule and, when approved, all other Accounts (or the full amount
of the other Accounts) may be invested in the following (except that any
Transfer or Rollover Accounts and Cooper Bearing Transfer Accounts may not
presently be invested in Kaydon stock):





	 	1.	 	Balanced I Fund — Wellington
	 
	 	2.	 	Guaranteed Income Fund
	 
	 	3.	 	Invesco Dynamics Account
	 
	 	4.	 	Janus Advisor Balanced Account
	 
	 	5.	 	Janus Worldwide Account
	 
	 	6.	 	Kaydon Corporation Stock (the “Stock Account”)
	 
	 	7.	 	Large Cap Growth/Goldman Sachs Fund
	 
	 	8.	 	Large Cap Value/John A. Levin & Co. Fund
	 
	 	9.	 	Mid Cap Growth/Artisan Partners
	 
	 	10.	 	Mid Cap Value Fund — Wellington
	 
	 	11.	 	Retirement 2010 Fund
	 
	 	12.	 	Retirement 2020 Fund













 











	 	13.	 	Retirement 2030 Fund
	 
	 	14.	 	Retirement 2040 Fund
	 
	 	15.	 	Retirement Goal Income Fund
	 
	 	16.	 	Small Cap Growth/TimesSquare Fund
	 
	 	17.	 	Small Cap Value/TCW Fund
	 
	 	18.	 	Templeton Foreign Account
	 
	 	19.	 	TimesSquare High Grade Bond Fund





	 	 	Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, no funds may be
transferred from any other Fund into the CIGNA Guaranteed Short Term
Account and no funds may be transferred from to CIGNA Guaranteed Short
Term Account in the CIGNA Actively Managed Fixed Fund without first having
been transferred into one or more other Funds for at least ninety (90
days.
	 
	E.2	 	The Parkstone Intermediate Government Obligations Fund (the “Government
Obligations Fund”) was previously available, but was not available for
additional allocations after December 31, 1993. That Investment Fund was
available for additional allocations until December 31, 1993 and continued
to be available for existing allocations to the Option on December 31,
1993 until March 31, 1994.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11409 and #11410] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1785-DR), dated 08/26/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Tropical Storm Fay.                     

*Incident Period:*                         08/18/2008 through 09/12/2008.                     

*Effective Date:*                         09/11/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/27/2008.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/26/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/26/2008 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*

Baker, Collier, Glades, Jefferson, Lake, Marion, Nassau, Orange, Polk. 

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Alachua, Bradford, Citrus, Columbia, Desoto, Hardee, Hillsborough, Levy, Madison, Manatee, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Pasco, Sumter, Taylor, Union. 

Georgia: Brooks, Camden, Charlton, Clinch, Ware.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-22182 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1853 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1853

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend enterprise 
         communities for the same period as empowerment zones.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2001

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend enterprise 
         communities for the same period as empowerment zones.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY TREATMENT THROUGH 2009.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 1391(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (relating to period for which designation is in effect) is 
amended to read as follows:
                    ``(A) December 31, 2009,''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 08-CR-128-01-PB 

KURT SANBORN 

GOVERNMENT’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The United States submits this disclosure statement pursuant

to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.4.

The alleged victim in this case is Diamond Action, Inc.

__ The government identifies the following parent

corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or

more of the victim’s stock:

__ The government identifies the following publicly held

corporation with which a merger agreement with the victim exists:

__ Where a partnership is a victim, the government

identifies the following publicly held corporation that holds an

interest in the partnership, the corporate partner’s parent

corporation, and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or

more of the corporate partner’s stock.

X The victim has none of the above.

Case 1:08-cr-00128-SM Document 6 Filed 11/12/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Dated: November 12, 2008

Respectfully submitted, 

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

/s/ Robert M. Kinsella

Assistant United States Attorney

53 Pleasant St., 4th Floor

Concord, New Hampshire 03301

Telephone No.: (603) 225-1552

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on November 12, 2008, I caused a copy

of the foregoing to be filed electronically.

/s/ Robert M. Kinsella

Robert M. Kinsella

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 1:08-cr-00128-SM Document 6 Filed 11/12/08 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6536

ALAN C. DEBNAM, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3424-20BH) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan C. Debnam, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Alan C. Debnam seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 25, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on January 2, 2004. * Because Debnam failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gary DeWayne Johnson

v. Case No. 07-cv-161-PB

Robert Thyng

O R D E R

Re: Document No. 94, Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment

Ruling: On or before December 15, 2008, the plaintiff shall

file an affidavit that identifies with specificity everything

that he told defendant Thyng concerning his request for

protective custody prior to his assault. I will rule on the

motion for summary judgment after reviewing this affidavit. 

Assistant Attorney General Pacik shall contact the prison and

take whatever steps are necessary to make sure that the plaintiff

is given whatever assistance he needs in order to comply with

this order.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 4, 2008

cc: Danielle L. Pacik, Esq.

Gary DeWayne Johnson, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00161-PB Document 102 Filed 12/04/08 Page 1 of 1
#### Henry Hudson Gardens, L.L.C., Respondent, v Isaac Bareda, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

[808 NYS2d 67]

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, entered October 22, 2004, which, inter alia, affirmed an order of Civil Court, Bronx County (Elizabeth J. Yalin Tao, J.), entered January 16, 2003, denying respondent tenant’s motion to stay eviction in a summary holdover proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The tenant acted pro se when the landlord commenced the latest of four holdover proceedings against him for chronic nonpayment of rent. He eventually stipulated to a six-month schedule of payments on penalty of losing the apartment. After making several of these payments late, he moved, again pro se, for relief from the stipulation, which Civil Court denied. At this point he obtained counsel, who moved for reargument, which was also denied.

The tenant admittedly violated a stipulation into which he had voluntarily entered *(see Mill Rock Plaza Assoc. v Lively,*224 AD2d 301 [1996]). The record reveals that Civil Court *467discussed the stipulation with the tenant before he signed it. Although no transcript exists to show the precise points reviewed, the tenant has not convincingly shown that he unwittingly forewent the assertion of any fatal defect in the fourth holdover proceeding against him. Moreover, the record shows that on the motion to vacate, Civil Court adequately considered the fairness of the stipulation and properly found no reason to relieve the tenant of its effects.

We have considered the tenant’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ. [See 5 Misc 3d 127(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51234(U) (2004).]
IIB

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1870

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To provide for the sale of certain real property within the

Newlands Project in Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1870 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

3 Loading Facility Transfer Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF FALLON, NEVADA.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (b)

7 and (c), the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to

8 the city of Fallon, Nevada, all right, title, and inter9 est of the United States in and to approximately 6.3

10 acres of real property in the Newlands Reclamation

11 Project, Nevada, generally known as ‘‘380 North

12 Taylor Street, Fallon, Nevada’’, and identified for

13 disposition on the map entitled ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

14 Loading Facility’’.

15 (2) MAP.—The map referred to in paragraph

16 (1) shall be on file and available for public inspec17 tion in—

18 (A) the offices of the Commissioner of the

19 Bureau of Reclamation; and

20 (B) the offices of the Area Manager of the

21 Bureau of Reclamation, Carson City, Nevada.

22 (b) CONSIDERATION.—

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require

24 that, as consideration for the conveyance under sub25 section (a), the city of Fallon, Nevada, shall pay to
3

HR 1870 RFS

1 the United States an amount equal to the fair mar2 ket value of the real property, as determined—

3 (A) by an appraisal of the real property,

4 conducted not later than 60 days after the date

5 of enactment of this Act by an independent ap6 praiser approved by the Commissioner of Rec7 lamation and paid for by the city of Fallon, Ne8 vada; and

9 (B) without taking into consideration the

10 value of any structures or improvements on the

11 property.

12 (2) CREDIT OF PROCEEDS.—The amount paid

13 to the United States under paragraph (1) shall be

14 credited, in accordance with section 204(c) of the

15 Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of

16 1949 (40 U.S.C. 485(c)), to the appropriate fund in

17 the Treasury relating to the Newlands Reclamation

18 Project, Nevada.

19 (c) LIABILITY.—The conveyance under subsection (a)

20 shall not occur until such data as the Commissioner of

21 Reclamation certifies that all liability issues relating to the
4

HR 1870 RFS

1 property (including issues of environmental liability) have

2 been resolved.

Passed the House of Representatives March 6,

2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jody Burtsell

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00455-JL

New Hampshire Department

of Health and Human Services,

Commissioner

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

June 11, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00455-JL Document 11 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: June 4, 2009

cc: David P. Slawsky, Esq.

Jason D. Reimers, Esq.

Nancy J. Smith, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00455-JL Document 11 Filed 06/04/09 Page 2 of 2