alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Label	Description
Date	Quarterly frequency; Date
National	U.S. Aggregate Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions).   The estimate corresponds to the Flow of Funds series FL155035013 starting in 2001:Q1.  
Arizona	Arizona Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
California	California Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Florida	Florida Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Georgia	Georgia Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Illinois	Illinois Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Indiana	Indiana Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Maryland	Maryland Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Massachusetts	Massachusetts Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Michigan	Michigan Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Missouri	Missouri Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
New Jersey	New Jersey Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
New York	New York Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
North Carolina	North Carolina Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Ohio	Ohio Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Tennessee	Tennessee Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Texas	Texas Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Virginia	Virginia Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Washington	Washington Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Wisconsin	Wisconsin Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Midwest	Midwest Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Northeast	Northeast Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
South	South Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
West	West Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
East North Central	East North Central Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
East South Central	East South Central Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Mid-Atlantic	Mid-Atlantic Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Mountain	Mountain Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
New England	New England Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Pacific	Pacific Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
South Atlantic	South Atlantic Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
West North Central	West North Central Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
West South Central	West South Central Households' Owner-occupied Real Estate at Market Value (billions)
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 8Federal Reserve Bank of: St. LouisFilings received during the week ending May 21, 2016FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks

Loan volume Percent change from Percent change from

(billions of dollars) previous quarter previous year

Real Non-real- Real Non-real- Real Non-realTotal estate estate Total estate estate Total estate estate

Quarter loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans loans

1996: Q2... 65.7 24.7 41.0 6.5 2.7 8.9 3.4 4.7 2.7

 Q3... 66.6 24.9 41.6 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.9 4.7 .3

 Q4... 65.5 25.0 40.5 -1.6 .3 -2.8 2.8 4.6 1.8

1997: Q1... 63.8 25.4 38.4 -2.6 1.4 -5.1 3.4 5.5 2.0

 Q2... 69.0 26.2 42.8 8.2 3.3 11.5 5.1 6.2 4.4

 Q3... 71.1 27.0 44.2 3.0 2.9 3.1 6.8 8.1 6.0

 Q4... 71.3 27.1 44.2 .3 .7 .0 8.9 8.5 9.1

1998: Q1... 70.1 27.6 42.4 -1.7 1.8 -3.9 9.8 9.0 10.4

 Q2... 75.0 28.5 46.5 7.1 3.2 9.6 8.6 8.8 8.5

 Q3... 76.3 28.9 47.4 1.7 1.3 1.9 7.2 7.2 7.3

 Q4... 74.7 29.3 45.5 -2.0 1.3 -4.0 4.8 7.8 3.0

1999: Q1... 72.7 29.7 42.9 -2.8 1.7 -5.6 3.7 7.6 1.1

 Q2... 75.8 30.8 45.1 4.4 3.5 5.0 1.1 8.0 -3.1

 Q3... 76.8 31.4 45.5 1.3 1.9 .9 .7 8.6 -4.1

 Q4... 76.0 31.8 44.2 -1.0 1.5 -2.8 1.7 8.8 -2.8

2000: Q1... 71.5 31.4 40.1 -5.9 -1.4 -9.2 -1.6 5.5 -6.5

 Q2... 79.7 33.7 45.9 11.4 7.5 14.4 5.0 9.6 1.9

 Q3... 80.1 33.9 46.2 .6 .5 .6 4.3 8.1 1.6

 Q4... 80.9 34.0 46.9 1.0 .3 1.5 6.4 6.8 6.1

2001: Q1... 79.4 34.3 45.1 -1.9 .8 -3.9 11.0 9.2 12.4

 Q2... 82.9 35.1 47.7 4.4 2.5 5.8 4.0 4.2 3.9

 Q3... 82.5 35.4 47.1 -.4 .8 -1.3 3.0 4.5 2.0

 Q4... 82.2 35.6 46.7 -.3 .4 -.9 1.6 4.6 -.5

2002: Q1... 80.1 36.0 44.1 -2.6 1.2 -5.5 .9 4.9 -2.2

 Q2... 83.7 37.0 46.7 4.4 2.7 5.9 1.0 5.1 -2.1

 Q3... 84.4 37.7 46.7 .9 2.1 -.1 2.3 6.5 -.9

 Q4... 83.9 38.0 45.9 -.6 .6 -1.6 2.0 6.8 -1.7

2003: Q1... 82.0 38.7 43.3 -2.3 1.9 -5.7 2.4 7.5 -1.9

 Q2... 84.5 39.6 44.9 3.1 2.5 3.7 1.1 7.3 -3.9

 Q3... 85.5 40.2 45.4 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.4 6.5 -2.8

 Q4... 86.1 40.6 45.5 .6 1.1 .2 2.7 7.0 -.9

2004: Q1... 84.3 41.4 42.9 -2.1 1.9 -5.7 2.8 7.0 -.9

 Q2... 88.9 42.9 46.0 5.4 3.6 7.2 5.2 8.3 2.4

 Q3... 91.5 43.9 47.6 2.9 2.3 3.5 6.9 9.2 4.9

 Q4... 92.3 44.5 47.7 .8 1.5 .2 7.1 9.6 4.9

2005: Q1... 89.3 45.0 44.3 -3.2 1.1 -7.2 5.9 8.7 3.3

 Q2... 93.5 46.2 47.3 4.7 2.7 6.6 5.1 7.7 2.7

 Q3... 96.7 47.1 49.5 3.4 2.0 4.8 5.7 7.4 4.0

 Q4... 97.5 47.6 49.9 .9 1.0 .8 5.7 6.9 4.6

2006: Q1... 96.2 48.4 47.7 -1.4 1.8 -4.4 7.7 7.6 7.7

 Q2... 101.0 49.8 51.2 5.1 2.9 7.2 8.1 7.8 8.3

 Q3... 104.2 51.1 53.0 3.1 2.5 3.6 7.8 8.4 7.1

 Q4... 105.4 52.2 53.2 1.2 2.1 .3 8.1 9.7 6.5

2007: Q1... 105.0 53.4 51.6 -.4 2.3 -3.0 9.2 10.2 8.1

 Q2... 109.3 54.8 54.5 4.1 2.7 5.6 8.2 9.9 6.5

 Q3... 110.8 56.0 54.9 1.4 2.2 .6 6.4 9.5 3.4

 Q4... 112.3 56.8 55.5 1.3 1.5 1.2 6.6 8.9 4.3

2008: Q1... 110.4 57.9 52.5 -1.7 1.9 -5.3 5.2 8.5 1.8

 Q2... 117.4 60.4 57.0 6.3 4.4 8.5 7.4 10.3 4.5

 Q3... 119.9 61.6 58.3 2.1 1.9 2.4 8.2 10.0 6.3

 Note. Data are as of end of quarter.

21
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11449 and #11450]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1795-DR), dated 09/23/2008. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms and flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/12/2008 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         09/23/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/24/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/23/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/23/2008, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans)*: La Porte, Lake, Porter. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Indiana: Jasper, Newton, St Joseph, Starke. Illinois: Cook, Kankakee, Will. Michigan: Berrien. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.750Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 114496 and for economic injury is 114500. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-22901 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-001-01-SM

Jose Arroyo Castillo

O R D E R

On November 18, 2011, defendant appeared for a “probable

cause” hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1 on three alleged

violations of conditions of supervision. The defendant

stipulated to probable cause on violations number 1 and 2 and

requested a probable cause hearing on violation number 3. Based

on the findings and reasoning stated on the record, the court

finds probable cause to believe he committed violation number 3.

The final revocation hearing on all three violations is scheduled

before Judge McAuliffe on December 21, 2011 at 1:30pm. 

Defendant also requested a detention hearing pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6). Under Rule 32.1(a)(6), the

defendant bears the burden of establishing by clear and

convincing evidence that he will not flee and that he poses no

danger to any other person or to the community. Based on the

testimonial evidence and proffers presented at the hearing, and

for the reasons more fully stated on the record, the court finds

the defendant has failed to meet this burden and that there are

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 43 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 2
no conditions that are likely to assure the safety of the

community. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending a final revocation hearing. 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection

with a court proceeding. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Daniel J. Lynch

Daniel J. Lynch

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: November 18, 2011

cc: Counsel of Record

 U.S. Marshal

 U.S. Probation

2

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 43 Filed 11/18/11 Page 2 of 2
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (269 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 9 Gross Value of Final Products and Nonindustrial Supplies  Item
2009
2014
2015
2015Q1
Q2[r]
Q3[r]
May[r]
June[r]
July[r]
Aug.[r]
Sept.[r]
Oct.[p]Final products and nonindustrialsupplies
3,259.8
3,712.2
3,762.3
3,761.6
3,801.5
3,765.9
3,745.8
3,805.7
3,800.8
3,797.9
3,800.3Final products
2,413.4
2,757.9
2,793.3
2,791.2
2,829.4
2,795.1
2,776.1
2,834.7
2,828.2
2,825.3
2,822.7Consumer goods
1,796.1
1,965.5
1,996.0
1,997.2
2,033.0
1,996.7
1,985.6
2,037.3
2,029.7
2,031.8
2,029.5Durable
354.5
491.6
500.7
514.8
536.4
523.1
508.2
549.7
529.2
530.2
534.3Automotive products
200.5
320.5
326.6
339.8
359.0
348.6
332.0
373.0
352.0
352.1
355.9Other durable goods
154.0
171.1
174.0
175.0
177.6
174.7
176.1
177.3
177.4
178.2
178.6Nondurable
1,441.6
1,487.2
1,509.8
1,498.6
1,514.2
1,490.7
1,493.2
1,506.3
1,517.5
1,518.7
1,512.7Equipment, total
617.3
800.3
805.2
801.7
804.0
806.3
798.1
805.0
806.1
800.9
800.6Business and defense
600.0
773.0
784.8
789.7
792.4
794.5
787.2
793.0
794.4
789.7
790.0Business
483.2
657.6
669.3
675.4
678.8
680.2
673.1
679.6
680.2
676.7
677.1Defense and space
116.8
115.9
116.0
114.9
114.2
114.9
114.7
114.1
114.9
113.7
113.6Nonindustrial supplies
846.4
954.1
969.0
970.4
971.6
970.8
970.0
970.4
972.1
972.3
977.6Construction supplies
232.2
276.6
280.0
280.7
281.4
281.1
281.8
281.6
282.4
280.1
285.1Business supplies
614.2
677.9
689.5
690.1
690.7
690.1
688.6
689.3
690.2
692.7
692.8Commercial energy products
232.5
247.5
253.8
251.2
249.5
250.7
249.3
249.8
248.3
250.6
249.3     Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
#### Jerome MARKAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill LOCKYER, et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-15931.

D.C. No. CV-99-01479-GEB/GGH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 18, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Markay’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM**

California state prisoner Jerome Markay appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, challenging his conviction for two counts of battery on a non-prisoner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.

Markay first contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to prepare a defense, to interview witnesses, and to object to a witness’ testimony. Because this contention is belied by the record, Markay fails to demonstrate counsel’s performance was outside the wide range of reasonable assistance. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687-688, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (deciding that a petitioner demonstrates his counsel was ineffective by establishing that his counsel’s performance was deficient, and that the deficient performance prejudiced his defense).

To the extent Markay alleges that his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation was hindered by inadequate library access, this contention fails. Markay fails to demonstrate that any alleged denial of adequate library access by the trial court prejudiced his right to self-representation, since he had his own investigator, access to the law library, permission to interview *752witnesses, and was subsequently appointed counsel to represent him. *Cf Milton v. Morris,*767 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir.1985) (recognizing that “an incarcerated defendant may not meaningfully exercise his right to represent himself without access to law books, witnesses, or other tools to prepare a defense”).

Therefore, the district court properly denied federal habeas relief on Markay’s claims. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *Woodford v. Visciotti*537 U.S. 19, 123 S.Ct. 357, 361, 154 L.Ed.2d 279 (2002) (per curiam) (stating that the federal habeas scheme “authorizes federal-court intervention only when a state-court decision is objectively unreasonable”), *reh’g denied,*— U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 957, 154 L.Ed.2d 855 (2003).1

AFFIRMED.2

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Markay’s remaining claims were not encompassed within the certificate of appealability, and we decline to address them. *See*§ 2253(c)(3); *Hiivala v. Wood,*195 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

2

. The clerk shall file the appellee's corrected supplemental excerpts of record received on September 20, 2002.
## 3.12 U
. S
. RESER VE ASSETS Millions of dollars, end of period 2002 Asset 1999 2000 2001 May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov
. Dec. p 1 T

otal
................................. 71,516 67,647 68,654 69,579 74,696 74,751 75,307 75,860 75,499 75,690 r 79,006 2 Gold stock 1
............................ 1 1 , 04 8 1 1 , 04 6 1 1 , 04 5 1 1 , 044 1 1 , 044 1 1 , 04 2 1 1 , 04 2 1 1 , 04 2 1 1 , 04 2 1 1 , 04 3 r 11,043 3 Special drawing rights 2,3
................. 1 0 , 3 3 6 1 0 , 5 3 9 1 0 , 7 7 4 1 1 , 29 7 1 1 , 64 5 1 1 , 5 7 5 1 1 , 7 5 2 1 1 , 7 1 0 1 1 , 7 00 1 1 , 8 5 5 1 2 , 1 6 6 4 Reserve position in International Monetary Fund2
............................ 1 7 , 9 5 0 1 4 , 8 24 1 7 , 8 5 4 1 6 , 4 9 8 1 9 , 8 4 1 1 9 , 8 6 3 20 , 04 3 20 , 8 5 7 20 , 5 8 6 20 , 4 8 0 2 1 , 9 7 9 5 Foreign currencies 4
..................... 3 2 , 1 8 2 3 1 , 2 3 8 2 8 , 9 8 1 3 0 , 7 40 3 2 , 1 6 6 3 2 , 27 1 3 2 , 47 0 3 2 , 2 5 1 3 2 , 1 7 1 3 2 , 3 1 2 3 3 , 8 1 8

1. Gold held ‘ ‘under earmark’ ’ at Federal Reserve Banks for f oreign and international accounts i s not included in the gold stock of the United S tates; see table 3 .13, line 3
. Gold stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights ( SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of exchange rates f or the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December 1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U
. S
. SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July 1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979— $1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.


## 3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD A T FEDERAL RESER VE BANKS 1 

### Millions of dollars, end of period
2002 Asset 1999 2000 2001 May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov
. Dec. p 1 Deposits
.............................. 71 215 61 127 90 164 86 150 89 78 c 136

Held in custody 2 U.S
. Treasury s ecurities 2
................. 632,482 594,094 592,630 605,501 619,226 635,036 638,003 644,381 647,165 669,092 678,106 3 Earmarked gold 3
....................... 9 , 9 3 3 9 , 4 5 1 9 , 09 9 9 , 0 8 4 9 , 07 7 9 , 07 1 9 , 0 64 9 , 0 5 7 9 , 0 5 0 9 , 04 5 9 , 04 5

1. Excludes deposits and U
. S
. Treasury securities held f or international and regional 3. Held in f oreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not organizations included in the gold stock of the United S tates.

2. Marketable U.S
. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S
. Treasury securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.
B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures
________________________________________________________________________________

Year                       Q1          Q2          Q3          Q4          Total
________________________________________________________________________________

1987......    |            22          19          12          16             69
1988......    |            11           6          12           7             36
1989......    |             5           7           5           5             22
1990......    |             3           5           6           3             17
1991......    |             2           2           3           1              8
1992......    |             1           1           1           4              7
1993......    |             1           2           2           0              5
1994......    |             0           0           0           0              0
1995......    |             0           0           0           0              0
1996......    |             0           2           0           0              2
1997......    |             0           0           0           1              1
1998......    |             0           0           1           0              1
1999......    |             0           1           0           0              1
2000......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2001......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2002......    |             1           0           0           1              2
2003......    |             0           1           0           0              1
2004......    |             0           1           0           0              1
2005......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2006......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2007......    |             0           0           0           0              0
2008......    |             1           0           0           2              3
________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure.  Industrial banks and
mutual savings banks also are excluded.  Agricultural banks are defined in the
introduction to section B.
   n.a. Not available.

29