alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 5Federal Reserve Bank of: RichmondFilings received during the week ending April 21, 2012FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodEAGLEBANK                                                                                                               * BranchEagleBank, Bethesda, Maryland, to establish a branch at 277 South Washington Street, Alexandria, VirginiaNewspaper: 05/03/2012Federal Register: Not applicableHARVEST BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                   CICU.S. Immigration Investment Center, LLC, Washington, D.C., and Ms. Mahnaz Khazen, as its managing director, to acquire up to 24.9% of the voting securities of HarVest Bancorp, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/10/2012STELLARONE BANK                                                                                                         * BranchStellarOne Bank, Christiansburg, Virginia, to establish a branch at 5711 Patterson Ave, Richmond, VirginiaNewspaper: 04/23/2012Federal Register: Not applicable
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-60-01-JD

Brooks Wallace

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

21) filed by defendant is granted.

Parties are placed on notice that there will be no further

continuances.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: July 18, 2008

cc: Robert J. Veiga, Esq.

Jorel V. Booker, Esq.

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00060-JD Document 22 Filed 07/18/08 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:08-cr-00060-JD Document 22 Filed 07/18/08 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0659

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL JOE PAINTER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to 

file his opening brief, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of 

time to and including May 1, 2023 within which to file his opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 3 2023

04/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0659
<PAGE>   1


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth St. N.W.
Washington, DC 20259
USA



                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Campbell Resources Inc. (the "Corporation") for the year ended December 31,
1997 of our report dated March 9, 1998 which appears under Item 14 of the
aforementioned Annual Report on Form 10-K.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-28296 and
33-91824)pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan and Director's
Stock Option Plan and on Form F-3 pertaining to the Common Shares underlying
Share Purchase Warrants (Registration No. 333-1882) and to the reference to our
firm under the caption "Experts" in the prospectuses related to these
Registration Statements.



March 27, 1998                                 Independent Chartered Accountants
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darien Moore, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 157]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J., on dismissal motion; Joan Sudolnik, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered July 28, 1998, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, assault in the second degree, tampering with physical evidence and resisting arrest, *313and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 8 to 16 years, and order, same court (Joan Sudolnik, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2001, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s mistrial motion, and his subsequent motion to vacate judgment, both made on the ground that the People violated their obligations under *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83) by belatedly disclosing documents that revealed the existence of potential witnesses, were properly denied. There is no indication that, during trial, defendant made an effort to locate either of the witnesses in question, insisting instead on a mistrial or lengthy continuance (see, *People v Stridiron,*33 NY2d 287, 292-293). In any event, there is no reasonable possibility that earlier disclosure of the desk appearance tickets issued to two persons at the time of defendant’s arrest would have affected the verdict. As noted, one of these individuals was ultimately located, and defendant has not established that the information set forth in the affidavit this person furnished in connection with defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion would have impeached the credibility of the People’s witnesses to such an extent that it would have affected the outcome of the trial.

The challenged portions of the People’s summation, while improper, do not warrant reversal.

Summary denial of defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of an alleged irregularity in the grand jury proceeding was proper because, even assuming the truth of defendant’s allegations, there was no impairment of the integrity of the proceedings warranting dismissal (see, CPL 210.35 [5]; *People v Adessa,*89 NY2d 677; *People v Darby,*75 NY2d 449).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 1Federal Reserve Bank of: BostonFilings received during the week ending January 19, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56918-56919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22910]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Advisory Committee on Women Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee 
on Women Veterans will meet October 28-30, 2008 at the Capital Hilton, 
16th and K Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30-4:30 p.m., each day. 
The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs regarding the needs of women veterans with respect to health 
care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and 
activities administered by the VA designed to meet such needs. The 
Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such 
programs and activities.
    On October 28, the agenda will include overviews of the Veterans 
Health Administration, the Veterans Benefits Administration, the 
National Cemetery Administration, an update on the 2008 Advisory 
Committee on Women Veterans Report, and an update on the activities 
conducted by the

[[Page 56919]]

Center for Women Veterans. On October 29, the agenda will include 
discussion on legislation related to women veterans, women veterans' 
health, updates to recommendations made in the 2008 Advisory Committee 
on Women Veterans Report, updates from the Department of Labor, and 
VA's suicide prevention initiatives. On October 30, the agenda will 
include updates on rural health, military sexual assault prevention and 
response programs, and VA's homeless programs. The agenda is tentative 
and is subject to change.
    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Ms. 
Shannon L. Middleton, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for 
Women Veterans (00W), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. 
Ms. Middleton may be contacted either by phone at (202) 461-6193, fax 
at (202) 273-7092, or e-mail at [email protected]. Interested persons may 
attend, appear before, or file statements with the Committee. Written 
statements must be filed before the meeting, or within 10 days after 
the meeting.

    Dated: September 24, 2008.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Phillip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-22910 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 215

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which

in size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. TOWNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to

ban toys which in size, shape, or overall appearance

resemble real handguns.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS.

4 The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall pro5 mulgate a rule in accordance with section 9 of the Con6 sumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058) to declare

7 as a banned hazardous product under section 8 any toy

8 which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles a

9 real handgun.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-235-01-SM

Kelly Vietze

O R D E R

Defendant Vietze’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 15). Trial has been rescheduled for the April 2008

trial period. Defendant Vietze shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than December 31 2007. On the filing of such waiver, her continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: March 21, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. 

Jury Selection: April 1, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00235-SM Document 16 Filed 12/18/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

December 18, 2007 

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq. 

Clyde R.W. Garrigan, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00235-SM Document 16 Filed 12/18/07 Page 2 of 2