alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.01

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-83590) of Meridian National Corporation and in the related
prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-72256 and
333-961) pertaining to the 1990 Non-qualified and Incentive Stock Option Plan
and to the Amended and Restated 1987 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
of Meridian National Corporation included in this annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended February 28, 1999




                                             REHMANN ROBSON, P.C.


Farmington Hills, Michigan
June 18, 1999
1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the yea

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1996 1997 1998

1999 2000

June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.p

1 Deposits .............................. 167 457 167 409 257 166 243 189 501 71 82

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 638,049 620,885 607,574 611,372 619,004 626,669 634,086 621,351 629,430 632,482 627,326

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 11,197 10,763 10,343 10,329 10,329 10,271 10,155 10,114 10,015 9,933 9,866

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; no

included in the gold stock of the United States.
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (250 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 10 Gross-Value-Weighted Industrial Production: Stage-of-Process Groups  Item
2011gross value[1]
Fourth quarter tofourth quarter
Annual rate
Monthly rate
Nov. '11toNov. '122012
20122009
2010
2011
Q1
Q2[r]
Q3[r]
June[r]
July[r]
Aug.[r]
Sept.[r]
Oct.[r]
Nov.[p]Finished
1921.4
-4.9
4.8
6.9
11.6
4.4
-.1
.6
.3
-.9
.2
-1.2
1.3
4.3Semifinished
1627.7
-8.4
9.0
3.2
10.4
5.1
-2.9
-.2
.5
-2.0
.1
-.6
1.4
3.3Primary
1331.9
-3.5
4.4
2.4
-2.7
-.6
-1.1
-.2
.0
-.1
-1.1
-.5
.5
-1.8Crude
653.9
1.2
6.6
2.6
.5
-5.0
5.0
.1
1.1
.0
1.3
-.4
.6
1.6    Return to table    Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-135-01-SM

Normand Forand

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document

no. 8) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2009

trial period. Defendants shall file Waivers of Speedy Trial Rights

not later than January 15, 2009. On the filing of such waiver, his

continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a

continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that

failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny the

defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation

taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: March 6, 2009 at 4:00 PM

Jury Selection: March 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM

Case 1:08-cr-00135-SM Document 9 Filed 01/05/09 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

January 5, 2009 

 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Michael Zaino, Esq.

 Paul Garrity, Esq.

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00135-SM Document 9 Filed 01/05/09 Page 2 of 2
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: July 6, 2010
The Court notes that, despite the fact that Plaintiff has failed to respond to numerous

1

court orders, no mail has been returned. Thus, the Court presumes that Plaintiff is receiving its

orders. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge William J. Martínez

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02247-WJM-KLM

DEREK SPEIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

FERRELL & SELDIN, Attorney at Law

THOMAS FERRELL, Individually

BARRY SELDIN, Individually

CAPITAL ONE BANK N.A.

Defendants.

ORDER AFFIRMING NOVEMBER 15, 2011 RECOMMENDATION AND 

DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court on the November 15, 2011 Recommendation by

United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix that this action be dismissed without

prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with multiple court orders and failure to

prosecute. (ECF No. 5.) The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised Plaintiff that specific written objections were due

within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 1

5 at 3.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s

Case 1:11-cv-02247-WJM-KLM Document 6 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
-2-

Recommendation were filed. “In the absence of timely objection, the district court may

review a magistrate . . . [judge’s] report under any standard it deems appropriate.” 

Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to

require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de

novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings”). 

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and concludes that “there is no

clear error on the face of the record.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s

note. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the United States Magistrate

Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United

States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 5), filed November 15, 2011, is ACCEPTED. For the

reasons cited therein, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk

shall close the case.

Dated this 9 day of December, 2011. th

BY THE COURT:

 

William J. Martínez 

United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02247-WJM-KLM Document 6 Filed 12/09/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1997: Q4... 100 * .01 5.00 6.00 34.00 31.00 16.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1998: Q4... 100 .01 .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 * * * 1999: Q4... 100 .01 .01 3.00 9.00 30.00 36.00 17.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2000: Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2001: Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 2002: Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 2003: Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q4... 100 52.53 18.20 16.11 8.68 3.71 .65 * * * * * * * * 2005: Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 42.96 22.94 21.11 8.58 2.62 1.52 * * * * * * * *  Q4... 100 52.53 18.20 16.11 8.68 3.71 .65 * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-921-08-1320-EL-P; MTM 98618]


Notice of Invitation--Coal Exploration License Application MTM 
98618

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Members of the public are hereby invited to participate with 
Western Energy Company in a program for the exploration of coal 
deposits owned by the United States of America in lands located in 
Rosebud County, Montana, encompassing 921.06 acres.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Giovanini, Mining Engineer, or 
Connie Schaff, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Solid Minerals (MT-921), 
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana State Office, Billings, 
Montana 59101-4669, telephone (406) 896-5084 or (406) 896-5060, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lands to be explored for coal deposits 
are described as follows:

T.1N., R.4E., P.M.M.
    22: All.
    24: Lots 1, 2, W\1/2\NE\1/4\, N\1/2\NW\1/4\, N\1/2\S\1/2\NW\1/
4\, SW\1/4\SW\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    Any party electing to participate in this exploration program shall 
notify, in writing, both the State Director, BLM, 5001 Southgate Drive, 
Billings, Montana 59101-4669, and Western Energy Company, P.O. Box 99, 
Colstrip, Montana 59323. Such written notice must refer to serial 
number MTM 98618 and be received no later than 30 calendar days after 
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register or 10 calendar days 
after the last publication of this Notice in the Miles City Star 
newspaper, whichever is later. This Notice will be published once a 
week for two (2) consecutive weeks in the Miles City Star, Miles City, 
Montana.
    The proposed exploration program is fully described, and will be 
conducted pursuant to an exploration plan to be approved by the Bureau 
of Land Management. The exploration plan, as submitted by Western 
Energy Company, is available for public inspection at the BLM, 5001 
Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana, during regular business hours (9 
a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through Friday.

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Edward L. Hughes,
Acting Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals.
 [FR Doc. E8-22699 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0001023877
<NAME>                    Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1993
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        9
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (8)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          9
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         7
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     (7)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 (7)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        (7)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.02**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:November
                20,2006
            
            /s/
                Sean J. AustinSean
                J. Austin,Chief
                Financial Officer
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1615

To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of status

under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending

the deadline for classification petition and labor certification filings.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for

adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by extending the deadline

for classification petition and labor certification filings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 245(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Im5 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)(B)(i))

6 is amended by striking ‘‘April 30, 2001;’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘April 30, 2002;’’.
2

•HR 1615 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact3 ment of the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (as en4 acted into law by Public Law 106–553).

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Catherine D. Daniul, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[807 NYS2d 477]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a certified nurse’s aide at a residential health care facility from January 2001 until January 2003. When her supervisor requested that she attend a meeting to discuss her job performance, she refused because she was upset and feared that she might say something prompting her termination. Even after her supervisor warned her that she would be discharged if she did not attend the meeting, she refused to do so. Claimant was terminated as a result and applied for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified her from receiving benefits on the ground that her employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

An employee’s insubordinate conduct in failing to comply with an employer’s reasonable request can constitute disqualify*1062ing misconduct (see *Matter of Tunne [Commissioner of Labor],*21 AD3d 1194, 1195 [2005]; *Matter of Francano [Commissioner of Labor],*12 AD3d 768, 768 [2004]). Here, the employer’s request was reasonable and claimant’s fear of discharge did not constitute a good reason for her failure to attend the meeting. She was fully aware that she was placing her job in jeopardy by refusing to do so. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1914

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 2001

Received

AN ACT

To extend for 4 additional months the period for which

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1914 RDS

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

2 Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law

3 105–277, as amended by Public Law 106–5, Public Law

4 106–70, and Public Law 107–8, is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘June 1, 2001’’ each place it

6 appears and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2001’’, and

7 (2) in subsection (a)—

8 (A) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2000’’ and in9 serting ‘‘May 31, 2001’’, and

10 (B) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ and insert11 ing ‘‘June 1, 2001’’.

12 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

14 on June 1, 2001.

Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.