alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                          Item 6(a), Exhibit 11


                  Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
             Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                For the Periods

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              July 1, 2001           January 1, 2001
                                                 through                 through
                                           September 30, 2001      September 30, 2001
                                           ------------------      ------------------
                                               (unaudited)             (unaudited)
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
Net Income (Loss)                               ($138,915)              ($1,442,186)
                                               ==========              ============
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
Outstanding                                     4,224,870                 4,217,756
                                               ==========              ============

Earnings (Loss) per Common Share               $    (0.03)             $      (0.34)
                                               ==========              ============
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              July 1, 2000           January 1, 2000
                                                 through                 through
                                           September 30, 2000      September 30, 2000
                                           ------------------      ------------------
                                               (unaudited)             (unaudited)
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
Net Income                                     $  391,977                 $  379,987
                                               ==========                 ==========
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
Outstanding                                     4,162,120                  4,094,100
                                               ==========                 ==========

Earnings per Common Share                      $     0.08                 $     0.09
                                               ==========                 ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT AUGUST 31, 2000 AND
THE RESULTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,642,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,306,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                   171,000
<INVENTORY>                                    831,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,207,577
<PP&E>                                       2,158,720
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,653,619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,800,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,750,621
<BONDS>                                        188,543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,708
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,845,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,800,628
<SALES>                                     11,452,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,534,033
<CGS>                                        6,295,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,295,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,201,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                274,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (80,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            354,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   354,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
#### Rex SWANK, Petitioner, v. Nathan MAYO, Custodian of Florida State Prison, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Oct. 3, 1956.

Rex Swank, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the return of the respondent to the writ of habeas corpus issued herein, the Court finds that petitioner has served in excess of the maximum sentence which could lawfully be imposed on him under Anglin v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 918.

Therefore, the petitioner is ordered discharged from the custody of the respondent.

DREW, C. J., and HOBSON, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-113-PB

Shane Sylvester

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the 

trial scheduled for May 5, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to finalize plea negotiations in this case and to resolve a

violation in a companion case, 02-cr-111-PB. The government does

not object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 5, 2009 to June 2, 2009. In agreeing

to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00113-PB Document 16 Filed 04/23/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 23, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

May 27, 2009 at 2:00 p.m.

No further continuances.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 22, 2009

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Donald Feith, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00113-PB Document 16 Filed 04/23/09 Page 2 of 2
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... 17 2 11 4 0 .039 .005 .024 .009 .000

2006...... 20 2 6 1 12 .042 .003 .012 .002 .023

2007...... 8 -3 0 5 6 .015 -.006 .000 .009 .011

2008...... n.a. 5 8 12 n.a. n.a. .008 .013 .020 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
| (1)                                  |         | The Report fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |
| (2)                                  |              | The information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

| /s/ Robert D. Sznewajs                |   | /s/ Anders Giltvedt                                  |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| President and Chief Executive Officer |        | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| March      11, 2010                   |        | March      11, 2010                                  |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dow

v. Civil No. 07-cv-355-JL

NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated January 14, 2009, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

February 11, 2009 _________________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Frank E. Dow, Pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00355-JL Document 27 Filed 02/11/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         395,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,573,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    502,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,015,000
<PP&E>                                       1,487,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 679,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,907,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,318,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,319,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,799,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,907,000
<SALES>                                      5,678,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,678,000
<CGS>                                        3,733,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,496,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,581,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,581,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2109 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2109

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for 
            possible inclusion in the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to 
as ``the Secretary'') shall conduct a study of Virginia Key Beach Park 
in Biscayne Bay, Florida, which was used for recreation by African 
Americans at a time when public beaches were racially segregated by 
law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of the site and 
the suitability and feasibility of establishing the site as a unit of 
the National Park System.
    (b) Criteria.--In conducting the study required by subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for 
potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in section 8 
of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5; popularly known as the National 
Park System General Authorities Act).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall transmit to the 
Congress a report on the findings of the study and the conclusions and 
recommendations of the Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00714

- CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS ex. rel. Todd A. Durden, In His Official Capacity as County Attorney

, Appellant s

v.

James T. 'Tully' SHAHAN , In His Official Capacities as County Judge; Mark Frerich, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Joe Montalvo, In His Offi cial Capacity as County Commissioner; Dennis Dodson, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Tim Ward, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner; Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County, Appellee

- s

From the 63rd Judicial Distric t Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4845 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss. Appellant is ORDERED to file a response to the appellees’ motion on or before January 21, 2020.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , J ustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRU Z

, Clerk of Court
#### Mrs. Kate M. ANDERSON v. STATE ex rel. Greek L. RICE, Atty. Gen., and State Mineral Lease Commission.

No. 31773.

Supreme Court of .Mississippi, Division B.

June 3,1935.

J. Morgan Stevens, Harry M. Bryan, and Green, Green & Jackson, all of Jackson, for appellant.

J. A. Lauderdale, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellees.

ANDERSON, Justice.

Conceding that under the law the hospital board had no right to purchase and acquire title to the land, still its title is good against every one except the state; it may be used both offensively and defensively; and no one-hut the state can raise the question of the legality of the title. Nicholson v. Myres, 170 Miss, 441, 154 So. 282; Quitman County v. Stritze, 70 Miss. 320, 13 So. 36; Middleton v. Georgetown Mercantile Co., 117 Miss. 134, 77 So. 956; Fritts v. Palmer, 132 U. S. 282, 10 S. Ct. 93, 33 L. Ed. 317. It follows that, having been authorized by the Legislature to do so, the hospital board could have conveyed to Anderson a good title. The chancellor found, however, from the evidence that the purchase money was never paid by Anderson, and therefore under the escrow agreement the deed was never legally delivered to him. We think the evidence amply justifies that finding.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, Presiding Justice

(specially concurring).

I agree to the affirmance of this case for the reasons stated in Judge ANDERSON’S opinion, but I am not prepared to agree that the Legislature validly authorized the board of trustees to convey to Anderson. The authority under which the grantors undertook to execute a conveyance to Anderson was a joint resolution and not a bill. Section 60 of the Constitution requires laws to be passed by bills, and provides how they shall be passed. Section 90 (u) of the Constitution prohibits the granting of lands under the control of the state by local, private, or special bills, and section 95 of the Constitution imposes important restrictions on the legislative power in that regard. Furthermore, the trustee’s term of office had expired before the alleged deed was signed. It is not necessary now to decide these questions, and I reserve my judgment on them until they are necessary to be decided.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Daniel Padro

Criminal No . 09-cr-02-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

15) filed by defendant is granted - trial is to be rescheduled to

my next trial period, July 21, 2009 .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : May 21, 200 9

cc : David Ruoff, Esq .

Terry Ollila, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00002-JD Document 16 Filed 05/21/09 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41080 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SANDRO MEDINA-TENIENTE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-357-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sandro Medina-Teniente pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully present in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that the special condition of supervised release that prohibits him from possessing a “dangerous weapon,” which is contained in the written judgment, conflicts with the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and must be deleted. His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v.No. 03-41080 -2- Torres-Aguilar , 352 F.3d 394, 937-38 (5th Cir. 2003). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| Dated: August              19,              2008 |                                                                                                                              |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                             |                                                                                                                              |   |   |
| **MONEYLOGIX              GROUP, INC.**          |                                                                                                                              |   |   |
|                                             |                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|                                             |                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
| By:                                              | */s/ Majid              Haditaghi*                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|                                             | Majid              Haditaghi                                                                                                      |   |   |  |
|                                             | Chief Executive                Officer,Chief                Financial Officer andPrincipal                Accounting Officer |   |   |   |

----
FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 AND 15D-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew Cimerman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of HomeLife, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 45 days of the filing date of this Quarterly
Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
Quarterly Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: January 17, 2006             /s/ Andrew Cimerman
                                       ---------------
                                   Name: Andrew Cimerman
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer