alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1963 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 1963

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route taken by 
   American soldier and frontiersman George Rogers Clark and his men 
during the Revolutionary War to capture the British forts at Kaskaskia 
and Cahokia, Illinois, and Vincennes, Indiana, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GEORGE ROGERS CLARK NORTHWEST CAMPAIGN TRAIL 
              FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS 
              SYSTEM.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(41) George Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail.--The George 
Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail, tracing the water route and 
overland route of the 1778 and 1779 expedition of Lieutenant Colonel 
George Rogers Clark and his Virginia militia against the British in 
which he captured the British forts at Kaskaskia and Cahokia, in what 
is now Illinois, and twice captured Vincennes, in what is now 
Indiana.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Bobby Hemingway

Criminal No . 08-cr-93-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

9) filed by defendant is granted . Trial is rescheduled to the twoweek period beginning August 18, 2009 .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within

10 days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by

granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public

and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . §

3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : June 4, 200 9

cc : Jessica Brown, Esq .

Jennifer Davis, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00093-JD Document 10 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Edward G. Caminos, certify that:

# 1.             I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BPZ Energy, Inc.;

# 2.             Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3.             Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

# 4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules l3a—15(e) and l5d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

# (c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

# (a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

# (b)           Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| */s/ Edward G. Caminos*  | * * |   |
|--------------------------|----------|--------|
| Edward G.  Caminos       |     |
| Chief Financial  Officer |     |
| September 26,  2006      |     |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

K., et al.

v. Civil No. 09-cv-00094-JL

NH Department of Health

and Human Services, et al.

 SUMMARY ORDER

The plaintiffs motion to expedite motion to return passports

(document no. 13) is DENIED for the reasons explained during

today’s telephone conference with counsel. First, because the

affected plaintiffs have requests for the same relief pending as

part of child custody proceedings in state court, this court must

abstain from exercising jurisdiction under Younger v. Harris, 401

U.S. 37 (1971). See Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 422-23 (1979);

Malachowski v. City of Keene, 787 F.2d 704, 708-09 (1st Cir.

1986). While the plaintiffs have represented that the state

court has yet to act on their requests, that delay alone does not

suggest the lack of an adequate opportunity to raise whatever

objections they have under federal law. Second, in light of the

plaintiffs' representation that the defendants have not opposed

their requests in state court, the plaintiffs can obtain

effective injunctive relief against only the state court itself,

which is not a party to this action. 

Case 1:09-cv-00094-JL Document 28 Filed 07/21/09 Page 1 of 2
2

 SO ORDERED.

 

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: July 21, 2009

cc: Nancy Sue Tierney, Esq.

Karen A. Schlitzer, Esq.

Case 1:09-cv-00094-JL Document 28 Filed 07/21/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.69  



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	

 





13
April 2004 


SIRVA, Inc.

700 Oakmont Lane

Westmont, Illinois 60559

Attention: General Counsel 


Clayton,
Dubilier & Rice Fund V, L.P.

1403 Foulk Road, Suite 106

Wilmington, Delaware 19803

Attention: General Partner 


Ladies
and Gentleman 


Letter Agreement dated as of 19 November 1999  


        Reference is made to the letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement"), dated as of 19 November 1999, by and among SIRVA, Inc. (formerly known as NA
Holding Corporation) (the "Company"), North American Van Lines Inc. ("North American Van Lines"), Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund V, Limited Partnership and Exel Investments Ltd.
(formerly known as NFC plc ("Exel"). 


        Pursuant
to Section 1(a)(ii), Section 1(a)(iii), Section 1(a)(iv), Section 1(b) and Section 1(c) of the Letter Agreement, Exel was granted certain
rights with respect to the boards of directors of the Company, North American Van Lines and other subsidiaries of the Company. 


        For
the past several years, other than receiving copies of materials sent to members of the Company's board of directors, Exel has not exercised any of its rights set forth in
Section 1(a)(ii), Section 1(a)(iii), Section 1(a)(iv), Section 1(b) and Section 1(c) of the Letter Agreement. 


        Now
that the Company has completed its initial public offering and has offered and sold shares of its common stock to the public, Exel has concluded that it does not desire to retain nor
to enforce its rights under Section 1(a)(ii), Section 1(a)(iii), Section 1(a)(iv), Section 1(b) and Section 1(c) of the Letter Agreement. 








SIRVA, Inc.

Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund V, L.P.

13 April 2004

Page 2 


        Thus,
effective as of the date hereof, Exel hereby irrevocably surrenders and releases all of its rights set forth in Section 1(a)(ii), Section 1(a)(iii),
Section 1(a)(iv), Section 1(b) and Section 1(c) of the Letter Agreement. 


Yours
faithfully 


Exel
Investments Ltd 



	

By:	
 	

/s/  DOUGLAS EVANS      
 Name:  Douglas Evans

Title:    Director	
 	

 	
 	

 





	 	 	 
	cc:	 	Steven R Finley Esq

Paul S Bird Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023767
<NAME> HEALTHDESK CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,261,457
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,369,526
<PP&E>                                         891,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 405,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,871,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          591,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,457,505
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,871,638
<SALES>                                        376,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               376,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,352,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,024,112)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,024,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,024,712)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

   .  The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Form
      10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

   .  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Dated:  November 22,  2004



/s/  Gary F. Kimmons
-------------------------------
Gary F. Kimmons,  President,
Chief  Executive  Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 09-cr-01-01-SM

Jose Arroyo Castillo,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Castillo’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

19). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of July 2009. Defendant 

Castillo shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than June 29, 2009. 

On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 20 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for July 15, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. 

Jury selection will take place on July 21, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June , 2009 

cc: Bruce E. Kenna, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 20 Filed 06/18/09 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Monday, September 29, 2008 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Monday, September 29, 2008 will be:

Formal orders of investigation;

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 22, 2008.

Florence E. Harmon,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22644 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Amendment No. 6 to License and Distribution Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.5I 
  
 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT 
  

			
	 HP Agreement No.: 4660000765
	 	 Amendment No.: 6

		
	 Supplier: Altiris, Inc.
	 	  
		
	 Effective Date of Amendment: January 1, 2004
	 	 

  
 This Amendment No. 6 (the
“Amendment”) to the License and Distribution Agreement dated November 12, 1999, also known as HP Agreement No. 4660000765, and as previously amended by the parties from time to time (the “Agreement”) is made by and between
Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) and Altiris, Inc. (“Altiris”) as of the Effective Date referenced above. 
  
 Whereas HP and Altiris desire to amend the Agreement and hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	All capitalized terms which are not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning as ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

  

	2.	Section 9.5 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: 

  
 “License and Upgrade Fees for Internal Use—Deployment Solution. The license fee for a perpetual, Internal Use License of
Deployment Solution (previously known as Altiris eXpress) under Section 3.1 shall be [*]. Upgrade Protection, as set forth in Section 8.2 of the Agreement, is not included in such license fee. The license fee is payable by HP at the end of each
calendar quarter and is based on the number of nodes installed during such calendar quarter. If HP desires to receive Upgrade Protection for such licenses then HP shall pay an additional annual fee of [*] in advance of the annual Upgrade Protection
coverage period. Altiris reserves the right to increase the license fee or annual Upgrade Protection fee effective [*].” 
  

	3.	All other terms not expressly amended herein shall remain in full force and effect as set forth in this Agreement. Should a conflict arise between the Amendment and the Agreement,
the provisions of this Amendment shall control. 

  
 This Amendment
has been reviewed and accepted by the following parties as duly noted by signatures below. 
  

									
	 APPROVEDAND AGREED TO:
	 	 	 	 
			
	Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”)	 	 	 	Altiris, Inc. (“Altiris”):
					
	By:	 	 /s/    Marie-Luce Vantyghem        
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/    Rob Wellman        

	 	 	
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	Signature	 	 	 	 	 	Signature
					
	 Name:
	 	 Marie-Luce Vantyghem
	 	 	 	 Name:
	 	 Rob Wellman

	 Title:
	 	 Sol. Integration Mgr.
	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	 V.P. Strategic Alliance

	 Date:
	 	 March 4, 2004

	 	 	 	 Date:
	 	 March 2, 2004



  

			
	 Reviewed by Altiris Legal

	By:	 	 /s/    Eric Gardanier        

	 	 	

	 Date:
	 	 2/13/04                            

	 	 	




  

	[*]	This provision is the subject of a Confidential Treatment Request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF EARNINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FILED IN THE 1999 JEFFERIES GROUP, INC. 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          77,197
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,660
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                              2,370
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        1,842,888
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            376,506
<PP&E>                                          39,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,896,252
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     287,588
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    31,685
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                          1,616,493
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             186,420
<LONG-TERM>                                    149,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,896,252
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              232,239
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           115,425
<COMMISSIONS>                                  202,803
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   80,749
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,496
<COMPENSATION>                                 329,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,095
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      84,095
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,727
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.55


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Roland A. Leveille

v. Case No. 07-cv-347-PB

Paul Croteau

ORDER

The Defendant filed a Notice of Removal in the abovecaptioned action on October 22, 2007. The Defendant’s submission

did not include the initiating document filed by the Plaintiff in

Berlin District Court, which would appear to be a landlord and

tenant writ based upon the state district court case caption. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), in addition to the Notice

of Removal the Defendant is required to file "a copy of all

process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant ... in

such action." Additionally, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(b), the

court "may require the removing party to file with its clerk

copies of all records and proceedings in such State court ...." 

Thus, within ten (10) days of this date, the Defendant is ordered

Case 1:07-cv-00347-PB Document 5 Filed 11/06/07 Page 1 of 2
to file with the clerk of this court a copy of the state court

initiating document, which appears to be a landlord and tenant

writ, and any other pleadings filed in or process issued by the

Berlin District Court prior to the date the of the filing of the

Notice of Removal. The failure to file these documents within

this ten (10) day period will result in this case being remanded

to Berlin District Court. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

Date: November 6, 2007

cc: Wayne T. Moynihan, Esq.

Paul Croteau, pro se

Case 1:07-cv-00347-PB Document 5 Filed 11/06/07 Page 2 of 2