alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008...... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

2009...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 83.6 14.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008: Q1... 100.0 81.0 15.5 2.9 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 78.2 17.5 3.5 .6 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

2009: Q1... 100.0 69.9 23.6 5.6 .7 .2 .1

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
Exhibit 23- Independent Auditors' Consent

                                   EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
The Dress Barn, Inc.
Suffern, New York



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-17488,  33-47415,  33-60196 and 333-18135 on Form S-8 of The Dress Barn, Inc.
of our report dated September 12, 2001,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of The Dress Barn, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended July 28, 2001.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
October 26, 2001
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 03, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0045. PREMIUM FUNDING SOLUTIONS, LLC v. METRO ATLANTA TASK

FORCE FOR THE HOMELESS, INC..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2014CV250014
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1495

To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to prepare a report

about how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 has been used by

public and private sector employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 4, 2001

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To direct the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

to prepare a report about how the Fair Labor Standards

Act of 1938 has been used by public and private sector

employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Pay Improve5 ment Report Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1495 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT BY EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

2 COMMISSION.

3 Not later than one year after the date of enactment

4 of this Act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commis5 sion, using information supplied by the Department of

6 Labor, the Office of Management and Budget, and the

7 General Accounting Office, shall submit a report to the

8 Congress making findings and recommendations relating

9 to how the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

10 201 et seq.) has been used by public and private sector

11 employers to foster or exacerbate pay inequities, especially

12 such inequities based on an employee’s gender, race, color,

13 religion, or national origin, or such other factor as the

14 Commission finds relevant.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Cr. No. 07- - 

Keith Edgecomb

 INFORMATION

 

 The United States Attorney charges: 

COUNT ONE

[21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),841(b)(1)(C) and 846 - Conspiracy to 

Possess with Intent to Distribute Marijuana] 

 Beginning in or about 2001 and continuing through in or 

about March 2002, in the District of New Hampshire and elsewhere, 

the defendant,

Keith Edgecomb, 

knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully agreed and conspired 

together and with other persons known and unknown to the U.S. 

Attorney, to possess with intent to distribute a quantity of 

of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance. 

All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 

846, 841(a)(1)and 841(b)(1)(C). 

 

THOMAS P. COLANTUONO

United States Attorney

/s/ Mark A. Irish

 By: Mark A. Irish

 Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: January 31, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Amended Notice of Intent

AGENCY: United States Air Force, Air Mobility Command, Federal Aviation 
Administration.

ACTION: Amended notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347; 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508; and 32 
CFR Part 989.
SUMMARY: On Thursday, September 18, 2008, the Air Force issued its 
Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS) for the Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) Beddown and Flight 
Operations of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) at Grand Forks Air Force 
Base, North Dakota (Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 182/pg. 54139).
    This Amended Notice of Intent extends the scoping period from 30 
October 2008 to 21 November 2008, and reflects the collaborative 
efforts put forth by both the Air Force and FAA, as cooperating 
agencies, to meet their respective roles and responsibilities in the 
EIS process. Additional information is available at the project Web 
site listed below.
    For Further Information and Comment Submittal Contact: Mr. Doug 
Allbright, 618-229-0846, HQ AMC/A7PI, 507 Symington Drive; Scott Air 
Force Base, Illinois 62225 or via the project Web site at: http://www.grandforksuaseis.com.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-22778 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin
T. Michaels, Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                             
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | August 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS       
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Kevin T. Michaels           
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q3... 2 32 66 2 50 48 5 4

 Q4... 2 12 86 2 28 71 2 22008: Q1... 0 10 90 0 32 68 1 1 Q2... 6 17 77 6 27 67 6 2 Q3... 10 30 60 7 37 57 11 3 Q4... 46 23 31 26 46 27 35 32009: Q1... 58 27 15 37 42 21 54 2 Q2... 41 42 17 29 57 15 43 4 Q3... 58 34 8 38 53 9 54 3

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q3... 6 38 56 5 52 44 8 5

 Q4... 7 25 68 5 47 48 7 32008: Q1... 7 25 68 5 36 59 7 3 Q2... 8 35 57 8 40 51 12 4 Q3... 10 35 55 6 42 52 13 4 Q4... 36 36 29 31 45 24 42 32009: Q1... 48 38 14 46 42 13 57 3 Q2... 41 47 12 32 58 11 47 4 Q3... 56 38 5 45 45 10 57 3

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2007: Q3... 5 11 84 5 53 42 5 2

 Q4... 5 0 95 11 42 47 11 22008: Q1... 5 29 67 10 43 48 14 2 Q2... 10 19 71 19 29 52 14 3 Q3... 16 37 47 22 39 39 16 4 Q4... 50 17 33 61 22 17 72 22009: Q1... 71 29 0 59 35 6 75 1 Q2... 65 35 0 70 30 0 70 2 Q3... 84 16 0 68 32 0 68 3 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur President and Chief Executive Officer Powerwave Technologies,
Inc.
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1994: Q3... 100 4.00 4.00 20.00 21.00 23.00 24.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 1995: Q3... 100 * * 5.00 15.00 8.00 30.00 30.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 * * .01 * 1996: Q3... 100 * .01 15.00 18.00 25.00 22.00 15.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1997: Q3... 100 * .01 5.00 3.00 33.00 33.00 17.00 8.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1998: Q3... 100 * .01 8.00 10.00 30.00 29.00 16.00 6.00 .01 .01 * * .01 * 1999: Q3... 100 * 2.00 4.00 10.00 35.00 32.00 12.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2000: Q3... 100 .01 .01 1.00 1.00 16.00 30.00 28.00 19.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 2001: Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * * 2002: Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * * 2003: Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * * 2004: Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * * 2005: Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * * 2003: Q1... 100 37.28 22.16 18.64 14.73 4.88 1.72 .47 .02 .02 * * * * *  Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * *  Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * *  Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Mark Goldwasser,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.



                                                /s/ Mark Goldwasser
                                                -------------------
                                                Mark Goldwasser
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                February 23, 2004

                                       21
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1993

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay from July 1

to the third Monday in September the deadline for Medicare+Choice

organizations to report plan information, including information on the

adjusted community rates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. THOMAS, Mrs. THURMAN, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. SHAW, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. CAMP, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr.

HAYWORTH, and Mr. FOLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to delay

from July 1 to the third Monday in September the

deadline for Medicare+Choice organizations to report

plan information, including information on the adjusted

community rates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1993 IH

1 SECTION 1. DELAY IN MEDICARE+CHOICE REPORTING

2 DEADLINES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1854(a)(1) of the Social

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–24(a)(1)) is amended by

5 striking ‘‘July 1’’ and inserting ‘‘the third Monday in Sep6 tember’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) applies beginning with 2001.

Æ
#### ABNEY v. SNEED.

No. 4981.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

May 2, 1935.

W. M. Pollock, of Mansfield, for appellant.

Craig, Bolin & Magee, of Mansfield, for ap-pellee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit for $480, alleging the same was due him for labor done and services performed in the reworking of a well in search of oil and gas. He alleged that he had a lien and privilege on certain machinery, and prayed for a provisional seizure of same.

Defendant answered and, after trial had below, there was judgment for plaintiff as prayed for. Defendant perfected an appeal to this court.

*833The ease was regularly fixed for trial and due notice given the attorney of record. On the day of trial there was no appearance made by appellant and no brief has been filed since. We therefore presume the appeal has been abandoned, and it is so ordered.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal taken herein is dismissed, at appellant’s cost.
Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11



Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Unit

For the Periods



|                                            |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |    |           |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | --------- | - | -------------------------------------- | -- | --------- | -
|                                            |  | January 1, 2004 through March 31, 2004 |           |   | January 1, 2003 through March 31, 2003 |   
|                                            |  | (unaudited)                            |           |   | (unaudited)                            |   
|                                            |  |                                       
|Net income (Loss)                           |  | ($                                     | 28,527    | ) |                                        | ($ | 20,873    | )
|                                            |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |    |           |  
|Weighted Average Number ofUnits Outstanding |  |                                        | 4,222,870 |   |                                        |    | 4,222,870 |  
|                                            |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |    |           |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                    |  | $                                      | (0.01     | ) |                                        | $  | (0.01     | )
|                                            |  |                                        |           |   |                                        |    |           |