alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2086

To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code,

may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or certified

acupuncturist, massage therapist, naturopathic physician, or midwife,

without supervision or referral by another health practitioner.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide that benefits under chapter 89 of title 5, United

States Code, may be afforded for covered services provided by a licensed or certified acupuncturist, massage

therapist, naturopathic physician, or midwife, without supervision or referral by another health practitioner.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alternative Medical

5 Access for Federal Employees Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 2086 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEALTH BENEFITS COVERAGE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8902(k) of title 5, United

3 States Code, is amended—

4 (1) by inserting ‘‘acupuncturist, massage thera5 pist, naturopathic physician,’’ after ‘‘nursing school

6 administered clinic,’’ each place it appears; and

7 (2) by striking ‘‘nurse midwife,’’ each place it

8 appears and inserting ‘‘nurse midwife or other mid9 wife,’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered

12 into or renewed on or after the date of enactment of this

13 Act.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2075

To strengthen the National Defense Features program, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 2001

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN (for himself and Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To strengthen the National Defense Features program, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Defense Fea5 tures Program Enhancement Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS CONCERNING NA7 TIONAL DEFENSE FEATURES PROGRAM.

8 The Congress finds the following:

9 (1) The National Defense Features program,

10 which is funded from the National Defense Sealift
2

•HR 2075 IH

1 Fund established by section 2218 of title 10, United

2 States Code, is a constituent element of the defense

3 policy of the United States intended to provide es4 sential sealift capacity in emergencies, strengthen

5 the national shipbuilding base, and maintain a re6 source of highly trained merchant seamen.

7 (2) Implementation of the National Defense

8 Features program would provide significant benefits

9 both for the United States and for allied nations

10 during military contingencies.

11 (3) For the United States and nations allied

12 with the United States to realize these benefits, it is

13 essential that vessels built under that program enjoy

14 commercial opportunities in peacetime on trade

15 routes between the United States and allied nations

16 and that those vessels not be excluded from such op17 portunities through restrictive trade practices.

18 (4) The failure of vessels built, or to be built,

19 under the National Defense Features program to ob20 tain employment as common carriers or contract

21 carriers in the particular sector of any trade route

22 in the foreign commerce of the United States for

23 which they are designed to operate, together with

24 long-term domination of that sector of the trade
3

•HR 2075 IH

1 route by citizens of an allied nation, evidences the

2 existence of restrictive trade practices.

3 SEC. 3. ACTION TO PROMOTE NATIONAL DEFENSE FEA4 TURES PROGRAM.

5 In any case in which the Federal Maritime Commis6 sion finds the existence of the conditions specified in sec7 tion 2(4) to prove the existence of restrictive trade prac8 tices, it shall take action to counteract such practices, uti9 lizing all remedies available under section 10002(e)(1) of

10 the Foreign Shipping Practices Act of 1988 (46 U.S.C.

11 App. 1710a).

Æ
#### OSCEOLA GROVES, INC., a Florida corporation, and C. J. Gonterman, Petitioners, v. Verna B. WILEY, a widow, and Annie Laurie Reaves, single, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division A.

Jan. 28, 1955.

Paty, Downey & Paty, for petitioners.

Ira E. Billingham and Redfearn & Ferrell, for respondents.

DREW, Justice.

Certiorari is granted and the order of the lower court of October 13, 1954 in the above cause is quashed on authority of the opinion in Osceola Groves, Inc. v. Wiley, Fla., 78 So.2d 700, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, this day filed, with directions for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.

MATHEWS, C. J., and SEBRING and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... 129 28 17 46 38 .284 .062 .039 .099 .081

2005...... 59 8 16 12 24 .124 .017 .035 .026 .048

2006...... 73 9 7 23 34 .146 .018 .015 .045 .064

2007...... 90 8 13 23 47 .170 .014 .025 .042 .085

2008...... 150 12 20 42 75 .269 .022 .037 .074 .129

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 0 0 0

2008...... 1 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
DISTRICT COURT 

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 

1437 Bannock St. 

Denver, CO 80202 

Plaintiff(s): CODY POTTS

v. 

Defendant(s): CITIGROUP INC., ET AL . 

Case Number: 11CV2544 

Courtroom 215 (FKA Ctrm 7) 

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court, sua sponte. 

The Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing within thirty (30) days 

of this date why the matter should not be dismissed for failure to comply with one or more 

of the following: 

1. The Court’s Delay Reduction Order and/or Alternate Dispute Resolution Order. 

2. Failure to prosecute. C.R.C.P. 41(b)(2) and C.R.C.P. 121 Section 1-10. 

3. Failure to file pleadings pursuant to C.R.C.P. 16. 

In the absence of such showing, the case will be dismissed without prejudice and 

without further notice. Costs shall be awarded pursuant to C.R.S. 13-16-113(1). 

 DATED: JUNE 30, 2011. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 

 William W. Hood III 

 District Court Judge 

cc: Counsel 

EFILED Document 

CO Denver County District Court 2nd JD 

Filing Date: Jun 30 2011 4:10PM MDT 

Filing ID: 38461424 

Review Clerk: Nancy E Magdaleno

Case 1:11-cv-02177-REB-BNB Document 6 Filed 08/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 7Federal Reserve Bank of: ChicagoFilings received during the week ending July 22, 2006FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment Period1ST SOURCE BANK                                                                                                         * Branch1st Source Bank, South Bend, Indiana, to establish a branch facility to be located at 555 West Crosstown Parkway, Kalamazoo, Michigan.Newspaper: 07/31/2006Federal Register: Not applicableCOMERICA BANK                                                                                                           * BranchComerica Bank, Detroit, Michigan, to establish a branch facility to be located at 11608 Carmel Mountain Road, San Diego, California.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableCOMERICA BANK                                                                                                           * BranchComerica Bank, Detroit, Michigan, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1610 Stacy Road, Allen, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableFIRST FARMERS BANK & TRUST                                                                                              * 18C
Exhibit 15.2

Consent for 20-F for 2015

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-203977) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-161683, 333-161684 and 333-196453) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated April 4, 2016 relating to the financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
|PricewaterhouseCoopers AB    
|Stockholm, Sweden            
|April 4, 2016
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 459,083 40,104 92,173 150,283 23,101 2,670 17,508 Number of loans 9,665 1,466 1,999 3,012 1,022 44 461 Weighted average maturity (months)1 29.25 8.91 16.49 32.86 41.90 11.73 233.76 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.07 6.34 8.61 7.22 30.06 11.72 3.36 

Weighted average risk rating3 2.53 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.29 6.96 6.24 6.85 7.54 5.32 7.43 

 Standard error5 .21 .10 .37 .46 .34 3.03 .37 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.50 7.75 7.41 8.06 8.26 5.00 7.50  25th percentile 4.50 6.06 4.50 5.65 7.12 5.00 7.50  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 4.79 6.16 7.04 5.45 7.55 n.a. 6.51  Other livestock 7.20 7.45 n.a. 8.25 8.07 n.a. 5.74  Other current operating expenses7 6.50 7.14 6.28 6.42 8.06 5.00 7.64 

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.49 8.11 6.61 7.70 8.02 11.07 7.50  Farm real estate 7.17 7.39 6.25 7.03 7.34 n.a. 7.50  Other8 7.10 n.a. 8.19 7.24 6.19 n.a. n.a

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 59.23 36.87 41.12 66.32 38.73 n.a. 75.39  Under commitment 64.44 48.63 55.88 73.83 38.37 94.65 78.20  Callable 19.07 20.37 4.83 42.03 7.81 n.a. 2.80  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 24.38 25.95 8.73 8.83 13.23 n.a. 2.10  Other livestock 13.60 17.10 14.52 18.03 15.48 n.a. 4.52  Other current operating expenses7 46.77 53.05 70.04 51.03 31.25 94.65 20.10 

 Farm machinery and equipment 4.27 1.73 1.15 6.36 6.09 5.35 9.54  Farm real estate 8.55 2.17 3.34 13.15 15.68 n.a. 63.74  Other8 2.40 n.a. 2.22 2.60 18.28 n.a. n.a

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 32.96 .81 8.33 31.19 17.27 n.a. 63.74  Other 63.70 91.03 85.30 68.18 n.a. n.a. n.a Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 10203 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Bryan Okeeif Thomas,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:22

- CR

- 62

- 2

**__________________ ____________**  Before **Wiener, Stewart,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Okeeif Thomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Thomas has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to all ow us to make a fair evaluation of Thomas’s claims of

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 13, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10203 Document: 00516965138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023No. 23

- 10203

2 ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Thomas ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accor dingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Thomas’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is **DENIED** as untimely. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998). Case: 23-10203 Document: 00516965138 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2023
Exhibit 35.1

AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE 

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer” and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of February 27, 2019 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2019-1 Owner Trust, as follows:

|   | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of May, 2019.

 

|   | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul C. Honda                                        |  |
|   | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               |  |
|   | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |  |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv–2252-CMA-MJW

SHAWN D. ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

COLORADO DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS OFFICIALS EDWARD SNEAD,

ROBERT TUCKER,

RANDY ANDERSON,

BILLY BRUNELL, and

JAMES MICHAUD,

Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff’s Motion To Have This Civil Action Dismissed Without Prejudice (Doc.

# 27) is GRANTED. It is hereby

ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15) is

DENIED AS MOOT.

DATED: July 10 , 2012

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02252-CMA-MJW Document 28 Filed 07/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22600]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2874]


Petitions for Reconsideration and/or Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

September 19, 2008.
    Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents 
is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by October 10, 2008. See 
section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to oppositions must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions has expired.

Subject: In the Matter of Promotion of Competitive Networks in Local 
Telecommunications Markets (WT Docket No. 99-217).

    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22600 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0 2008: Q1... 13.9 10.7 15.9 9.7 38.0 20.2 9.1 12.2 13.6 14.3  Q2... 14.8 8.2 8.9 9.7 24.4 25.7 10.7 11.7 11.9 16.3  Q3... 14.8 8.6 13.2 9.2 34.6 22.5 9.0 11.1 13.9 15.6  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the
undersigned, Denise Hawkins, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Denise Hawkins 
Denise Hawkins
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  August 15, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
H. R. 1432

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3698 Inner

Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3698 Inner Perimeter Road in Valdosta, Georgia, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Major Lyn McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Lyn

McIntosh Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.