alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
2ND QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2000
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                                  53
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       68,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,324
<INVENTORY>                                        236,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   308,582
<PP&E>                                              40,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                      16,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     369,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              248,154
<BONDS>                                              9,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               132
<OTHER-SE>                                         108,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       369,328
<SALES>                                            369,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   369,387
<CGS>                                              312,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      312,464
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (294)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (426)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)



</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAG AUFTIN

Honazabls Sam% E. Kilday, ~irmtor Uotor Traneportstlon Division RailnxidCommiseionof Texas Austin, Texae

Ee rsoslved you which is self-explaxWxwy
granted laterat 12148 to Grri

t i~ow authbriaer
,etioa %mqu this Opwator, Porn&t tw dixldob end that tfnet pralta be iesued In or the transportation of only, using three 

### trueti, the anspertetionof Farm &t%ohinstry 

## ip50nt, ~0upiag

rim3 ti2tittkhWonorable Jam3 3. ltllday, **Yn@** 2

&tlcle 811b, -Section 6 (d) Of Veruon's ¬ated sIvI.1 xatutss, reads, in part, as f0110w3:
9%3 %jilrOab CoxdssIOn IS beerehp given euL!orItyto iosue upon applicatlOnto thoae persoas whcs ~ieslre to en,~agca In tho bushx3s cf transportlugfor hire eve: the h1gLwwaya of this Ztate, llverrtoak,

nohair,wool, milk, livestoak fee&stuffs,household: sooda, oil fIel% equip-, sent, an& used oftiae rumiture and el,ulpSent, timber when in It3 natural atate, fern m&in* erjj and grain s2eaIal peruitsupon mah, term3, oon&ItIonsan& restrIctslouaa the Railroad Conmis3Ion nag doew proper, an& to mrtke rule3 and re&atioaa gove:'nIn3 euah o>eratIoha keepIn,g

In mind the protectionof tho hIt@xweys and the safety of thetraveling publla;

. . .* The above artIale gIVC6 th6 TieIlroad COw~li.5Sfon t&a authorityto Iseue the slaIC peratits

*upon enah tearma,

aondi- 'tions, and m~trfations e3 the Railroad Cozvnlsslou my deen pro&ur,
. . .- %e are oi the opinion that the XaIlr"oa& CCEX&SS~OZI

he3 the authorItguu@.er the above article to divide~suah

pn interstateapaaial oommoditypennit. It nay well be that the &IlmmS fiuommlseiou nay find it neoeosary, in order to mora efieetlvelyrag&ate iuteratatespeaiaf. c&o&Itg notor carriera, to lesue separatepedtis to an ay;plIaaht,who

det3Imm to .haul

different &mmoCU.tIes rather than oa9bInIugth3 authorityto haul several oom!xodItIoe in the "9 permit.

NothIng In thle oplnlon shall be construe&BP holdin2 that any pev:tau, rim or ao~oration oan hold eevaral permits without eoqlyiq with the prorfeionsof the beotor u"srrIer

dat with respsat to the peyment of the neaeesary feea, ate., whiah are prarequisitato the abtaiS5~ of eaall perait. Yours very truly

APPROVEDMAR21, 1940

*&-
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1895

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a 2-year recovery

period for depreciation of computers and peripheral equipment used

in manufacturing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 2001

Mr. COLLINS (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. HORN, Mr. SHOWS,

and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish

a 2-year recovery period for depreciation of computers

and peripheral equipment used in manufacturing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Computer Equipment

5 Common Sense Depreciation Act’’.
2

•HR 1895 IH

1 SEC. 2. 2-YEAR APPLICABLE RECOVERY PERIOD FOR DE2 PRECIATION OF COMPUTERS AND PERIPH3 ERAL EQUIPMENT USED IN MANUFAC4 TURING.

5 (a) 2-YEAR APPLICABLE RECOVERY PERIOD.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

7 168(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat8 ing to applicable recovery period) is amended by in9 serting before the first item in the table the fol10 lowing new item:

‘‘Computers or peripheral equipment used in manufacturing .................................................................................... 2 years’’.

11 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Clause (iv) of

12 section 168(e)(3)(B) of such Code (relating to 5-

13 year property) is amended by inserting ‘‘(except

14 computers or peripheral equipment used in manufac15 turing)’’ before the comma.

16 (b) 2-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD UNDER ALTER17 NATIVE DEPRECIATION SYSTEM FOR TAX-EXEMPT USE

18 PROPERTY, ETC.—Subparagraph (C) of section 168(g)(3)

19 of such Code (relating to alternative depreciation system

20 for certain property) is amended to read as follows:

21 ‘‘(C) QUALIFIED TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIP22 MENT.—

23 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as pro24 vided in clause (ii), in the case of any
3

•HR 1895 IH

1 qualified technological equipment, the re2 covery period used for purposes of para3 graph (2) shall be 5 years.

4 ‘‘(ii) COMPUTERS OR PERIPHERAL

5 EQUIPMENT USED IN MANUFACTURING.—

6 In the case of any computer or peripheral

7 equipment used in manufacturing, the re8 covery period used for purposes of para9 graph (2) shall be 2 years.’’

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to property placed in service after

12 December 31, 2001.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,435
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,389
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,284
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,712
<LOANS>                                        870,931<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,036,062
<DEPOSITS>                                     707,694
<SHORT-TERM>                                   104,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,396
<LONG-TERM>                                     77,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,036,062
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,322
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,033
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   311
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,666
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,755
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,911
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  30
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,114
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,114
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,337
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,459
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,788
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      121
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,427
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,427
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,610
<FN>
<F1>LOANS HELD TO MATURITY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                          Item 6 (a), Exhibit 11



                  Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund
              Schedule of Computation of Earnings Per Common Share
                                For the Periods

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                              January 1, 1999   January 1, 1998
                                  through           through
                               March 31, 1999    March 31, 1998
                              ----------------  ----------------
                                (unaudited)       (unaudited)
<S>                           <C>               <C>
 
Net income (Loss)               $   (4,391)       $    4,169
                                ===========       ==========
 
Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding         2,210,434        2,210,434
                                ===========       ==========
 
Earnings per Common Share       $      0.00       $     0.00
                                ===========       ==========
 
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-64-01-SM

Alfred Kozloski

O R D E R

Defendant Kozloski’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 13). Trial has been rescheduled for the January 2009

trial period. Defendant Kozloski shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than October 14, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: January 9, 2009 at 4:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: January 21, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00064-SM Document 14 Filed 10/01/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

October 1, 2008

cc: Jonathan Saxe, Esq.

Alfred Rubega, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00064-SM Document 14 Filed 10/01/08 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         The undersigned, Albert F. Buzzetti and Michael Lesler hereby jointly
certify as follows:

(a)      They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer,
         respectively, of Bridge View Bancorp (the "Company");

(b)      To the best of their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
         10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") complies in all
         material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(c)      To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company



                                 /s/  Albert F. Buzzetti
                                 ------------------------------
                                 Albert F. Buzzetti
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer

                                 Date:  August 13, 2002



                                 /s/  Michael Lesler
                                 ------------------------------
                                 Michael Lesler
                                 Senior Vice President and
                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                 Date:   August 13, 2002

                                       29
<PAGE>
23

B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of total non-real-estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1993...... 54 7 16 5 26 .155 .020 .049 .014 .069

1994...... 69 10 11 15 33 .187 .026 .032 .037 .082

1995...... 51 -2 14 13 25 .131 -.004 .039 .032 .061

1996...... 95 16 27 24 30 .240 .039 .070 .058 .071

1997...... 93 6 19 19 50 .230 .014 .049 .045 .112

1998...... 87 4 15 24 45 .198 .008 .036 .051 .095

1999...... 126 18 37 35 36 .280 .040 .086 .078 .080

2000...... 108 11 17 34 45 .259 .027 .041 .075 .098

2001...... 308 67 53 140 48 .656 .142 .118 .294 .101

2002...... 221 40 50 58 73 .471 .085 .114 .124 .157

2003...... 175 34 35 48 58 .382 .074 .080 .108 .128

2004...... n.a. 28 17 46 n.a. n.a. .062 .039 .099 n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude

foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks that

are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data

are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 190 (Tuesday, September 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Prenatal Programming of 
Reproductive Health and Disease.
    Date: October 9, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Rm. 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#650900161f061f1c012508040c094b0b0c0d4b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcb0b9afa6bfa6a5b89cb1bdb5b0f2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-22896 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by the Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming

Percent

Less than 20.0 percent

2.0 2.0-4.9 5.0-9.9 10.0-14.9 15.0-19.9 and

Period Total percent percent percent percent percent over

1997...... 100.0 84.5 12.9 2.5 .1 .1 .0

1998...... 100.0 81.7 15.1 2.8 .3 ... .1

1999...... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000...... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001...... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002...... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003...... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004...... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005...... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006...... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007...... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008...... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.8 12.6 2.4 .3 .0 ...

2000: Q1... 100.0 81.8 14.8 2.9 .5 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 82.2 15.1 2.4 .3 .0 .0

 Q3... 100.0 83.0 14.9 1.7 .4 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 85.0 12.8 1.8 .3 ... ...

2001: Q1... 100.0 80.3 16.9 2.6 .2 .1 ...

 Q2... 100.0 80.2 16.6 3.0 .2 .1 ...

 Q3... 100.0 78.7 17.8 3.2 .3 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 80.0 17.3 2.5 .1 .0 ...

2002: Q1... 100.0 76.8 19.3 3.7 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 76.8 19.6 3.1 .4 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 77.8 18.8 3.2 .2 .0 ...

 Q4... 100.0 79.7 17.1 2.8 .2 .1 ...

2003: Q1... 100.0 75.4 19.9 4.1 .3 .2 .0

 Q2... 100.0 76.2 19.2 4.0 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 77.7 18.3 3.6 .3 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 81.2 15.0 3.3 .4 .1 .0

2004: Q1... 100.0 79.2 17.2 3.2 .2 .1 .0

 Q2... 100.0 81.3 15.1 3.2 .3 .0 .1

 Q3... 100.0 82.1 15.1 2.4 .2 .1 .0

 Q4... 100.0 85.3 12.7 1.7 .2 .1 ...

2005: Q1... 100.0 84.4 13.3 2.0 .2 .0 ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.7 12.0 2.0 .3 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.7 12.4 1.8 .1 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 87.2 10.7 1.9 .2 ... ...

2006: Q1... 100.0 85.6 12.6 1.7 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.8 12.5 1.5 .1 .0 ...

 Q3... 100.0 85.9 12.5 1.5 .0 ... ...

 Q4... 100.0 86.8 11.5 1.6 .0 .0 ...

2007: Q1... 100.0 84.9 12.9 2.0 .1 ... ...

 Q2... 100.0 85.2 12.2 2.5 .1 ... ...

 Q3... 100.0 83.6 14.1 2.1 .0 .0 .0

 Q4... 100.0 84.0 13.3 2.4 .2 .0 ...

2008: Q1... 100.0 81.0 15.5 2.9 .5 .0 .0

 Q2... 100.0 79.2 17.1 3.1 .4 .1 .1

 Q3... 100.0 78.2 17.5 3.5 .6 .1 .1

 Q4... 100.0 76.1 18.3 4.7 .8 .0 .0

 Note. Nonperforming loans are loans in nonaccruing status or past due 90 days or more. Renegotiated or restructured

loans in compliance with the modified terms are not included. Agricultural banks are defined in the introduction to section B.

Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 ... Not applicable.

26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Steven Swan

 v. Civil No. 06-fp-458

Paul Barbadoro, et al.

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from this case as I am a named

defendant.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 15, 2006

cc: Steven A. Swan, pro se

 

Case 1:06-cv-00458-GZS Document 6 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 1
Order filed November 1 , 2022.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00793

- CV

IN RE CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY D/B/A BOBCAT COMPANY , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 269th District Court Harris Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 201 9

- 69076



### O RDER

On October 28, 2022 , relator Clark Equipment Company d / b / a Bobcat Company ( “ CEC ” or “ relator ” ) filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52

. In the petition,
relator as ks this Court to compel the Honorable Cory Don Sepolio, presiding judge
of the 269th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate three orders: (1) the trial
court’s February 18, 20 22 order fi n ding that “Plaintiffs have demonstrated a
substantial likelihood o f success on their claims for exemplary damages in2

accordance with CPRC ch apter 41” as to CEC; (2) the trial court’s October 14,
2022 o rder incorporating the February 18, 2022 finding pursuant to Chapter 41 and compelling production of CEC’s “current net w orth” by November 4, 2022 at 5:00 p.m.; and (3) the trial court’s March 10 , 2022 o rder denying CEC’s motion to strike improper evidence used by RPIs in the hearing which resulted in the trial court’s February 18, 2022 Order.

R elator also has filed a mot io n for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. Relator requests this Court to stay the trial court’ s order of October
14 , 2022 requiring production of net worth evidence by November 4, 2022 pending
this Court’s c onsideration of the merits of relator’s petition. It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for mand amus relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief i s granted. We therefore gra nt relator’s motion for temporary relief and issue the following order:

We order the trial court’s October 14 , 20 22 order requiring production of net worth evidence by November 4, 2022 stayed until a final decision by this Court on relator’s petition for w ri t of mandamus, or until further order of this C ourt. In addition, the Court requests the real parties in intere st, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before November 18 , 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 52

. 4.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Daniel Riley

v. Case No. 08-mj-19

United States of America,

Thomas P. Colantuono,

Robert M. Kinsella,

Arnold H. Huftalen, and

Stephen R. Monier

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this case.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

February 6, 2008

cc: Daniel Riley, pro se

Case 1:08-mj-00019-WES Document 4 Filed 02/06/08 Page 1 of 1