alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 10Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas CityFilings received during the week ending May 18, 2013FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodADAMS BANK & TRUST                                                                                                      * BranchAdams Bank and Trust, Ogallala, Nebraska, to establish a branch at 3221 South Jeffers Street, North Platte, Nebraska.Newspaper: 05/31/2013Federal Register: Not applicableALTERRA BANK                                                                                                            * BranchAlterra Bank, Overland Park, Kansas, to establish a branch at 11120 West 135th Street, Overland Park, Kansas.Newspaper: 05/30/2013Federal Register: Not applicableCITIZENS BANK OF KANSAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION                                                                           MemberCitizens Bank of Kansas, N.A., Kingman, Kansas, to retain its membership in the Federal Reserve System following its conversion from a national to a state charter.Newspaper: Not applicableFederal Register: Not applicableCOMMERCE BANK AND TRUST HOLDING COMPANY                                                                                 CICNotification by Jerry K. Anderson, acting as Plan Administrator of the Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan, to retain control of Commerce Bank and Trust Holding Company, parent of CoreFirst Bank & Trust, all of Topeka, Kansas.Newspaper: 05/28/2013Federal Register: 05/28/2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-139-PB

Carl Connor et al.

O R D E R

Defendant, Crystal Lopez, through counsel, has moved to

continue the trial scheduled for August 18, 2009, citing the need

for additional time to negotiate a plea agreement or prepare for

trial. The government and co-defendants do not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from August 18, 2009 to November 4, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00139-PB Document 36 Filed 07/27/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The July 27, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to

October 19, 2009 at 4:30 p.m.

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

July 27, 2009

cc: Andrew Schulman, Esq.

Dona Feeney, Esq.

Paul Garrity, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00139-PB Document 36 Filed 07/27/09 Page 2 of 2
II

Calendar No. 411

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2143

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 2002

Received and read the first time

JUNE 10, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2143 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Death Tax

3 Repeal Act of 2002’’.

4 SEC. 2. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 901 of the Economic

6 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is

7 amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘shall not

9 apply—’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘(other

10 than title V) shall not apply to taxable, plan, or limi11 tation years beginning after December 31, 2010.’’,

12 and

13 (2) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘, estates,

14 gifts, and transfers’’.

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in section

17 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconcili18 ation Act of 2001.

Passed the House of Representatives June 6, 2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 411

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2143

AN ACT

To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

JUNE 10, 2002

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE

Civil Case No. 11-cv-02225-LTB-MJW

BRAD DOWNS and

TERESA DOWNS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., d/b/a THE GREAT INDOORS,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With

Prejudice (Doc 20 - filed April 3, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

it is therefore

ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to

pay their own fees and costs. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/Lewis T. Babcock 

Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

DATED: April 4, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02225-LTB-MJW Document 21 Filed 04/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-119-01/02-SM

Carlos Marsach, et al

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial for sixty days (document

no. 28) is granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the July trial period. Defendant

shall file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than July 23, 2009. On the filing

of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: September 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM 

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 29 Filed 07/13/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: September 15, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

July 13, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 29 Filed 07/13/09 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold Sherwood, Appellant.

[808 NYS2d 200]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J., at plea; Lewis Bart Stone, J., at sentence), rendered August 11, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of *People v Behlog*(74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the provision upon which defendant relies applies only to crimes committed after its effective date *(People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005]). In any event, the amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the new law’s effective date *(People v Walker,*81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WANDA HOLLOWAY,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA BARBER HOLDINGS, INC. FLORIDA BARBER ACADEMY, 

INC., and KERRY WILCOX,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-2214

[April 13, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barbara Anne McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18-

26958.

Kenneth D. Cooper, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

John M. Mullin and Brittany L. Hynes of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee Kerry Wilcox.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1996...... 39.25 59.00 24.23 26.00 17.23 95.19 3.73 14.95 45.22 545.93 1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2006...... 49.71 65.53 59.36 32.84 74.12 138.48 4.90 14.96 46.68 340.26 2007...... 48.27 64.93 50.33 36.27 47.41 117.22 5.35 15.11 46.62 302.38 2004: Q3... 33.42 32.56 62.64 18.04 42.06 143.63 3.76 14.56 44.91 359.39  Q4... 49.42 108.90 70.44 30.21 75.92 90.23 3.96 14.46 46.63 385.43 2005: Q1... 40.23 52.36 44.37 36.66 35.31 54.11 3.57 14.72 49.15 290.01  Q2... 42.75 70.57 38.44 23.68 78.69 132.29 3.95 14.60 46.31 371.83  Q3... 38.87 65.13 67.97 22.19 73.29 105.64 3.84 14.39 46.29 397.07  Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45 2006: Q1... 43.76 45.56 49.62 37.78 39.28 96.24 3.81 15.09 47.28 288.50  Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Q3... 51.48 81.93 89.64 26.57 50.49 172.18 5.41 15.01 45.16 377.96  Q4... 53.61 80.54 57.82 33.44 71.05 155.58 5.56 14.96 48.79 341.00 2007: Q1... 58.33 76.05 54.29 50.88 32.69 120.07 5.34 15.10 47.15 296.76  Q2... 39.55 48.25 33.93 32.08 41.55 95.17 5.40 15.11 45.96 276.68  Q3... 42.93 42.18 63.99 28.28 62.22 108.75 5.26 15.19 45.88 296.12  Q4... 54.29 84.90 53.85 36.07 53.00 145.08 5.39 15.03 47.47 335.44 2008: Q1... 66.99 70.42 57.84 57.17 37.17 152.28 5.63 15.42 46.38 339.22  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
#### Mrs. Amelia SMITH, Widow of Isaac Smith, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GRAND LODGE OF KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, etc. (Colored) Defendant and Appellant. *

No. 14514.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 27, 1933.

Prank B. Smith, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Walter M. Barnett, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellee.

PEE CUEIAM.

For the reasons assigned in Mrs. Ernestine Flowers, Widow of William Johnson, v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias (La. App.) 146 So. 782, decided by us this day, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

2 West Inc.

v. Case No. 08-cv-374-PB

GT Solar International, Inc. Et al.

O R D E R

I hereby recuse myself from presiding over this case as Attorney Jaime Hage has filed an

appearance.

SO ORDERED.

October 1, 2008 /s/ Paul Barbadoro

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:08-cv-00374-JM Document 14 Filed 10/01/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







/s/
      Mark GoldwasserMark
      Goldwasser
              Chief
      Executive OfficerFebruary 16, 2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 7077** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

HARRY RAMONE BAPTISTE ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Weste rn District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:99

- cr
- 00059

- RLV

- 1 )

Submitted : October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opi nion

.

Harry Ramone Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Harry Ramone Baptiste appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question

did not lower Baptiste’s Guidelines sentence, we find the
district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion.

United States v. Goines , 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004)
(stating standard of review). Accordingl y , we affirm the

district court’ s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

m aterials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
10(iii)

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE

2004
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Compensation and
Organization Committee of the Board of Directors has approved a program
for the award of management incentive compensation to members of
management and other key employees for 2004. The program is designed to
achieve the following:

		
	• 	link
company and division performance with the compensation of key
executives


		
	• 	provide significant
financial incentives to exceed the Company's performance
commitments


		
	• 	promote and reward
teams that are clearly focused on common
goals


		
	• 	recognize individual
achievement.


The program provides eligible participants an
opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus for 2004 equal to a percentage
of the participant's annual base salary in effect as of January
1, 2004. Each participant has the opportunity to earn a threshold,
target or maximum bonus amount that is contingent upon achieving
certain corporate, divisional and individual goals. Bonus amounts based
on results that fall between the threshold and the target level or the
target and the maximum level will be pro-rated. Potential bonuses range
from 5% of base salary to 200% of base salary, depending
on the participant's position with the Company. Bonuses may be
increased or decreased, at the discretion of the Company, based on
individual performance ratings.

The performance goals for the
Company and its divisions that will provide the basis for determining
bonus amounts have been approved by the Compensation and Organization
Committee. A significant percentage of the potential bonus for
participants based in specific divisions is tied to division
performance, with the balance of such bonus tied to corporate
performance. Bonuses for participants fulfilling corporate, but not
divisional, functions, are dependent on achieving the established
corporate goals and will not be affected by results of particular
divisions.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-5187 TERRY J. EASTER and MICHAEL EGGLESTON, Plaintiffs, and STEVEN A. HUDSON, MICHAEL S. MORGAN, VANESSA R. SPENCER, and JOHN A WINSLOW, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 04-CV-1435,

Judge Emily C. Hewitt. Before DYK, Circuit Judge.
ORDER Steven A. Hudson et al. (Hudson) moves for a 23-day extension of time, until February 23, 2009, to file their initial brief. Hudson states that the United States consents to the motion. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated.

### FOR THE COURT


# FEB 2 4 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT or APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### cc: Jules Bernstein, Esq. Shalom Brilliant, Esq. FEB 2 4 2009 

### s19 JAN HORBMLY CLERK Date

2008-5187 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 3Federal Reserve Bank of: PhiladelphiaFilings received during the week ending March 20, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodTOWER BANCORP INC.                                                                                                      * 3A5Tower Bancorp, Inc., Harrisburg, PA, to acquire First Chester County Corporation, West Chester, PA.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: 04/09/2010
#### MARKEL v. C. W. M. CONST. CO. et al.

No. 17664.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 16, 1942.

Samuel J. Tennant, Jr., of New Orleans, for Joseph Nolan Maurin, appellant.

Porteous, Johnson & Humphrey and F. Carter Johnson, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by a materialman against the building contractors and the owner of a certain piece of property bearing the municipal No. 5315 S. Liberty Street in the City of New Orleans, claiming $185.59.

The contractors, C. W. M. Construction Company, Inc., and Charles W. Mabry, made no defense, averring that the amount was due by Joseph Nolan Maurin.

Maurin denied liability on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to comply with Section 12 of Act No. 298 of 1926, as amended by Act No. 323 of 1938 (the Building Lien Statute), in that the claim was not recorded in the mortgage office within sixty days after the date of the last delivery of material as required by the statute.

There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor as prayed for against all defendants with recognition of a materialman’s lien and privilege against Maurin’s property. Maurin alone has appealed.

We discussed the pertinent section of the building lien law in the case of Markel v. Walker, 4 So.2d 448, and held that no personal judgment could be obtained against the owner by a materialman who had failed to record his lien “within sixty days after the date of the last delivery of all material upon said property”.

It is conceded that no written contract was entered into and none recorded in the mortgage office and that the last item of material making up the account sued on was delivered not later than September 27th, 1940, and that the affidavit supporting plaintiff’s claim was not filed in the mortgage office until December 16, 1940, about eighty days later. It is plain, therefore, that the plaintiff cannot recover as against Maurin, the owner of the building.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is reversed insofar as it runs against Joseph Nolan Maurin and his property and it is now ordered that there be judgment in favor of Joseph Nolan Maurin dismissing plaintiff’s suit at his cost. In all other respects the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed in part.

Reversed in part.
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as special servicerunder the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactionslisted on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to anylimitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

BBCMS 2018-C2

BBCMS Mortgage Trust 2018-C2,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-C2

(Fidelis Portfolio into MSC2018-H4)

 

Barclays Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesLLC

745 Seventh Avenue

New York, New York 10019

Attention: Daniel Vinson

 

Wilmington Trust, NationalAssociation

1100 North Market Street

Wilmington Delaware 19890

Attention: CMBS Trustee BBCMS2018-C2

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045-1951

Attention: Corporate Trust Services(CMBS)

BBCMS Mortgage Trust 2018-C2,Series 2018-C2

 

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

600 Third Avenue, 40th Floor

New York, New York 10016

Attention: BBCMS 2018-C2 -Surveillance Manager

(with a copy sentcontemporaneously via email to:

cmbs.notice@parkbridgefinancial.com)

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036