alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**ChiefFinancial Officer’s Certification of Report on Form 10-Qfor Quarterly Period Ending June 30, 2003**

 

I, MassoudSafavi, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of EFJ, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | July 29, 2003 |   | By:    | /s/ Massoud Safavi      |   |
|--------|---------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |          |   |   | Massoud Safavi          |   |
|   |          |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Hill, Appellant.

[805 NYS2d 823]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J., *327at plea; John E Collins, J., at sentence), rendered June 19, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and this waiver encompassed his excessive sentence claim *(People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733 [1998]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]) providing for the imposition of a DNA databank fee, that fee should not have been imposed. Since this issue involves the substantive legality of the sentence, it survives defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
                                  Estimated volume                  Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                               (millions of dollars)                                (percent)
                      ________________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1       Q2       Q3       Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                               
1999......    |         126      18       37       35       36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11       17       34       45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67       53      140       48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40       50       58       73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34       35       48       58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28       17       46       38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8       16       12       24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |          73       9        7       23       34      .146      .018      .015     .045      .064
2007......    |          90       8       13       23       47      .170      .014      .025     .042      .085
2008......    |         150      12       20       42       75      .269      .022      .037     .074      .129
2009......    |         435      65       59      151      159      .743      .111      .108     .265      .271
2010......    |        n.a.     153     n.a.     n.a.     n.a.      n.a.      .262      n.a.     n.a.      n.a.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
#### Katherine Tarone, Appellant, v Gregory J. Tarone, Defendant, and Madeleine Tarone, Respondent.

[807 NYS2d 576]

In an action to recover on a mortgage note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated September 20, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Madeleine Tarone which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Madeleine Tarone established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2

             CONSENT OF BEARD & COMPANY, INC., INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Regarding:

      1)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1988 Stock
           Incentive Plan (File #33-38427).

      2)   Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Dividend Reinvest
           ment Plan (File #333-02063).

      3)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Director Fee
           Plan (File #33-48031).

      4)   Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Main Line
           Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Agreements (File #33-50526).

      5)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1990 Non-Employee
           Directors' Stock Option Plan (File #33-59372).

      6)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1992 Stock
           Incentive Plan (File #33-68800).

      7)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Elmwood Bancorp,
           Inc. Key Employee Stock Compensation Program (File #33-77358).

      8)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the Amended and
           Restated Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with Donald E. Stone
           (File #33-77354).

      9)   Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to The Frankford
           Corporation 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan (File #33-82088).

      10)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Employee
           Stock Purchase Plan (File #33-91572).

      11)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Management
           Stock Purchase Plan (File #33-91574).

      12)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the National American
           Bancorp, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan (File # 333-02065).

      13)  Registration Statement on Form S-8 relating to the 1995 Non-Employee
           Director's Stock Option Plan (File # 333-04281).

      14)  Registration Statement on Form S-3 relating to the Senior/
           Subordinated Medium-Term Notes (File #333-25393).

      We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  above  listed
      Registration  Statements  of our report  dated,  February 28,  1997,  with
      respect to the consolidated  financial  statements of Financial Trust Corp
      and  subsidiaries  for the year ended December 31, 1996,  included in this
      Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Keystone  Financial,  Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 1997.


                                     /s/ BEARD & COMPANY, INC
                                     ------------------------

      Reading, Pennsylvania
      March 25, 1998

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1801 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1801

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2001

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 501 West 10th 
  Street in Fort Worth, Texas, as the ``Eldon B. Mahon United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 501 West 10th Street in 
Fort Worth, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Eldon B. 
Mahon United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eldon B. Mahon 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,343
<PP&E>                                           2,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,204)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,413
<SALES>                                          3,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,187
<CGS>                                              603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,262
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    746
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
Chart 1

Number, Size, and Volume of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2006

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

1

2

3

4

5

Number of non-real-estate farm loans Millions, annual rate

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

10

20

30

40

50

60

Average size of non-real-estate farm loans Thousands of dollars

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

25

50

75

100

125

Volume of non-real-estate farm loans

3

Billions of dollars, annual rate
Chart 2

Maturity and Interest Rate of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, 1980-2006

 Note. Effective (compounded) annual interest rates are calculated from the stated rate and other

 terms of the loans and weighted by loan size.

 -- Four-quarter moving average.

 Source. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers.

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average maturity of non-real-estate farm loans 20

Months

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

4

8

12

16

Average effective interest rate on non-real-estate farm loans 20

Percent

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

0

25

50

75

100 Share of farm loans with a floating interest rate

4

Percent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chad Evans

v. Civil No. 08-cv-105-JD

Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Chad Evans has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the constitutionality

of his state court conviction and confinement (document no. 1). 

Also filed is a Motion to Stay Processing of Habeas Petition and

Toll Limitations Period (document no. 3), which is hereby

granted.

Evans asserts that he is proceeding in state court to

exhaust state court remedies with regard to certain unexhausted

claims to be raised in his federal petition. Given the statute

of limitations concerns under the Antiterrorism and Effective

Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, he has filed the

instant mixed petition in order to preserve his exhausted claim. 

Because Evans has elected to proceed in state court, I order the

federal proceedings stayed and the petition held in abeyance

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 5 Filed 05/06/08 Page 1 of 3
2

pending his resolution of state court remedies. Once he has

exhausted state court remedies, he must request this Court to

lift the stay and preliminarily review his federal petition. 

Evans must commence the state court proceedings within

thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Accordingly, I will

order the proceedings stayed and the petition held in abeyance,

pending his complete exhaustion of state remedies. The stay will

be issued under the following two conditions:

1. Evans is ordered to contact this Court every

90 days, beginning from the date of entry of this

order, and inform the court of the status and

pendency of his state court proceedings, if any,

and the disposition of any appeal or related

matter. 

2. Within 30 days following any ruling and/or

notification by the New Hampshire Supreme Court on

the claims at issue, and the exhaustion of such

claims, Evans must notify this Court of the ruling

and submit all briefs or other pleadings filed in

the state court proceedings; he must also file a

request with this Court, stating that his state

court matter has been disposed of and that he

wishes to terminate the stay and have this Court

further consider his petition.

Failure to comply with either condition may result in

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 5 Filed 05/06/08 Page 2 of 3
3

dismissal of the petition without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: May 6, 2008

cc: David M. Rothstein, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 5 Filed 05/06/08 Page 3 of 3
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 16, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1596 Lower Tribunal No. 10-19578A

________________ 

### Devon Waltrell Lannigan,

Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge. Devon Waltrell Lannigan, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
CRYSTAL YANEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

DAVID HERNANDEZ, JR.,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00055-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2016DCV0289)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from the Appellant and her sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the judgment and 

all costs, for which execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
*Release Date: March 31, 2009*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

----

```
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 93   | 6                                      | 19                                                   | 19 | 50 | .230 | .014 | .049 | .045 | .112 |
| 87   | 4                                      | 15                                                   | 24 | 45 | .198 | .008 | .036 | .051 | .095 |
| 126  | 18                                     | 37                                                   | 35 | 36 | .280 | .040 | .086 | .078 | .080 |
| 108  | 11                                     | 17                                                   | 34 | 45 | .259 | .027 | .041 | .075 | .098 |
| 308  | 67                                     | 53                                                   | 140 | 48 | .656 | .142 | .118 | .294 | .101 |
| 221  | 40                                     | 50                                                   | 58 | 73 | .471 | .085 | .114 | .124 | .157 |
| 175  | 34                                     | 35                                                   | 48 | 58 | .382 | .074 | .080 | .108 | .128 |
| 129  | 28                                     | 17                                                   | 46 | 38 | .284 | .062 | .039 | .099 | .081 |
| 59   | 8                                      | 16                                                   | 12 | 24 | .124 | .017 | .035 | .026 | .048 |
| 73   | 9                                      | 7                                                    | 23 | 34 | .146 | .018 | .015 | .045 | .064 |
| 90   | 8                                      | 13                                                   | 23 | 47 | .170 | .014 | .025 | .042 | .085 |
| 150  | 12                                     | 20                                                   | 42 | 75 | .269 | .022 | .037 | .074 | .129 |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
v. JiiiG7 4AL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0058

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

NANCY CAROL CHASE,

Petitioner-Appellee,

and

MARK STEVEN CHASE,

Respondent-Appellant.

FILED

MAR 1 6 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Montana

ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

ON APPEAL FROM THE MONTANA THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY, HONORABLE PRESIDING MATTHEW J. WALD

DISTRICT COURT CAUSE NO. DR 17-41

For Petitioner/Appellee:

Jill Deanne LaRance

LaRance & Syth, P.C.

PO Box 1456

Billings MT. 59103-1456

Telephone: (406) 254-9663

Facsimile: (406) 254-9725

Email: jdlarance@laranceandsyth.com

Appearances:

For Respondent/Appellee:

Linda L. Harris

Harris Law Firm, P.C.

Old Chamber Building, Suite 100

Billings, MT. 59101-1260

Telephone and Facsimile: (406)259-4402

Email: Ilharrislaw@outlook.com

03/16/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0058
Appellant, Mark Steven Chase, has filed a Motion For Extension Of Time to File Appellant's

Opening Brief. Said Motion states good cause for the extension of requested and states further that

counsel for Appellee does not object to the extension requested.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Appellant's Motion For Extension Of Time to File Appellant's

Opening Brief is GRANTED. Appellant shall file his opening brief on or before April 13, 2020.

Copies of this Order shall be provided to all parties of record.

/ (-1--

DATED this / of March, 2020.