alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc.

v. Civil No. 06-cv-445-JD

Gradient Corporation

PROCEDURAL ORDER

Following a teleconference with counsel on this date, the

following schedule has been established:

1. By March 7, 2007, Gradient shall file its

response to MACTEC’s motion to compel

arbitration.

2. MACTEC shall reply within 10 days.

3. Any surreply shall be filed within 7

days.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

February 8, 2007

cc: Robert J. Gallo, Esquire

Daniel P. Luker, Esquire

Paul S. Samson, Esquire

Sigmund D. Schutz, Esquire

Case 1:06-cv-00445-JD Document 13 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 1
AMENDMENT TO KOPIN CORPORATION 2001 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



 Exhibit 4.4 
  

KOPIN CORPORATION 
  
 Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment 
  
 The Board of Directors of Kopin Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to authority reserved in Section 13 of the 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan of the Company (the “2001Plan”), authorized an amendment to the 2001 Plan as follows, which such amendment was approved by the stockholders of the Company on April 21, 2004: 
  
 Sections 4 and 8.1 of the 2001 Plan are deleted in their entirety and
replaced with the following: 
  
 4. Stock
Subject to the Plan. At no time shall the number of shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to or subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Plan exceed 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock; subject, however, to the provisions of
Section 8 of the Plan. For purposes of applying the foregoing limitation, if any Option expires, terminates, or is cancelled for any reason without having been exercised in full, or if any Award of Restricted Stock is forfeited by the recipient, the
shares not purchased by the Optionee or forfeited by the recipient shall again be available for Awards to be granted under the Plan. Shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to the Plan may be either authorized but unissued shares or shares held by
the Company in its treasury. 
  
 8.1.
Adjustment for Corporate Actions. All of the share numbers set forth in the Plan reflect the capital structure of the Company as of March 10, 2004. Subject to Sections 8.2 and 8.3, if subsequent to that date the outstanding shares of Common
Stock (or any other securities covered by the Plan by reason of the prior application of this Section) are increased, decreased, or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities, or if additional shares or new or different
shares or other securities are distributed with respect to shares of Common Stock or other securities, through merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all the property of the Company, reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification,
stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, or other distribution with respect to such shares of Common Stock, or other securities, an appropriate and proportionate adjustment will be made in (i) the maximum numbers and kinds of shares
provided in Section 4, (ii) the numbers and kinds of shares or other securities subject to the then outstanding Awards, (iii) the exercise price for each share or other unit of any other securities subject to then outstanding Options (without change
in the aggregate purchase price as to which such Options remain exercisable), and (iv) the repurchase price of each share of Restricted Stock then subject to a Risk of Forfeiture in the form of a Company repurchase right. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has adopted this Amendment, effective as of
the 21st day of April, 2004. 
  
 KOPIN
CORPORATION 
  
 By:    /s/    John C.C. Fan                     
 John C.C. Fan 
 President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Christopher Cremeans

v. Civil No. 08-cv-03-JL

NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner 

O R D E R

After due consideration of the objection filed, I herewith approve the Report

and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Muirhead dated February 12, 2008.

SO ORDERED.

March 5, 2008 /s/ Joseph N. Laplante

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

cc: Christopher Cremeans, Pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00003-JL Document 6 Filed 03/05/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,271,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,098,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    245,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,835,000
<PP&E>                                         625,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 158,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,093,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,265,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,111,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,410,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,093,000
<SALES>                                      1,363,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,363,000
<CGS>                                          858,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,627,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (299,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (299,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, 
Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 12650 McManus Blvd, Suite 103, 
Newport News, VA 23602, has been approved to gauge and accredited to 
test petroleum and petroleum products and organic chemicals for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b1b0a2fcbeb3b0baa392b6baa1fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1b2b3a1ffbdb0b3b9a091b5b9a2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 07, 2008. The 
next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall Breaux, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-
1060.

    Dated: September 16, 2008.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. E8-22221 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

William J. Carey

v. Civil No. 06-cv-479-PB

Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, et al

O R D E R

I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Muirhead dated May 15, 2007, no objection having been filed.

SO ORDERED.

June 18, 2007 /s/ Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

cc: William J. Carey, pro se

Nancy Smith, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00479-PB Document 24 Filed 06/18/07 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of BPZEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Manuel Pablo Zuniga - Pflucker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker*    | * * |
|---------------------------------------|----------|
| Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| January 17, 2006                 |

 

1

----
#### Lucius VASON, alias “Fats” Vason, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Dee. 21, 1954.

Latham & Davenport, Pensacola, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Moie J. L. Tendrich, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607.

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.
16

A.11. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- All Banks, by Risk Rating, November 7-11, 2005Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rateVolume of loans (thousands of dollars) 995,330 54,415 169,067 441,378 194,912 13,483 37,19Number of loans 24,573 1,447 4,683 10,657 3,608 787 60Weighted average maturity (months)1 21.02 67.35 14.64 20.17 15.70 27.75 10.7

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.16 26.16 8.60 5.18 .95 3.77 2.1

Weighted average risk rating3 2.94 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 7.44 7.14 7.68 7.29 7.44 8.61 8.4

 Standard error5 .14 .21 .19 .27 .24 .33 .2

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 8.25 7.79 8.09 8.25 7.98 9.11 8.4 25th percentile 6.70 6.91 7.10 6.26 6.70 8.11 8.3 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 7.50 7.37 7.72 7.16 7.95 9.66 8.2 Other livestock 7.72 6.98 7.62 7.79 7.34 n.a. 8.1 Other current operating expenses7 7.58 6.60 7.70 7.52 7.41 8.51 8.4

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.66 7.84 7.78 7.51 8.27 8.40 8.7 Farm real estate 7.09 7.78 7.33 6.77 7.76 n.a. 7.6 Other8 6.85 6.68 7.71 6.43 7.19 8.26 8.2

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 74.68 36.54 60.56 81.68 93.13 99.36 72.2 Under commitment 77.44 72.23 77.30 78.64 89.37 73.87 80.2 Callable 22.97 58.51 19.11 20.99 8.11 11.27 72.1 Subject to prepayment penalty 4.24 .19 1.23 1.93 2.26 .96 70.5 Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 20.40 29.16 35.73 18.80 15.21 13.37 10.9 Other livestock 11.55 4.99 11.66 10.64 11.92 n.a. 10.4 Other current operating expenses7 39.63 40.07 40.34 39.06 39.84 61.59 74.7

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.26 6.33 1.03 10.78 1.59 7.93 1.5 Farm real estate 6.83 18.62 5.20 8.98 2.82 n.a. 1.5 Other8 15.33 .83 6.04 11.74 28.62 17.10 .8

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 10.67 26.78 10.47 6.11 8.24 10.32 62.5 Other 85.83 72.87 86.81 89.13 90.49 86.75 33.6 For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1749 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1749

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   685 Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, as the ``Herbert H. 
                     Bateman Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 685 
Turnberry Road in Newport News, Virginia, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herbert H. Bateman Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006...... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

1998: Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .7 .8 .2 .6

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-30-PB

Danielle Rhodes, et al.

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for July 8, 2008, citing the need for additional

time to complete a psychiatric evaluation and prepare a defense. 

The government does not object to a continuance of the trial

date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from July 8, 2008 to October 7, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy

trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00030-PB Document 37 Filed 06/18/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The June 26, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

September 23, 2008 at 3:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 18, 2008

cc: James Gleason, Esq.

Richard Monteith, Jr.

Lawrence Vogelman, Esq.

Mark Machera, Esq.

Neil Faigel, Esq.

Terry Ollila, Esq. 

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00030-PB Document 37 Filed 06/18/08 Page 2 of 2
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1996: Q3... 100 * .01 15.00 18.00 25.00 22.00 15.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 * 1997: Q3... 100 * .01 5.00 3.00 33.00 33.00 17.00 8.00 2.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1998: Q3... 100 * .01 8.00 10.00 30.00 29.00 16.00 6.00 .01 .01 * * .01 * 1999: Q3... 100 * 2.00 4.00 10.00 35.00 32.00 12.00 4.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2000: Q3... 100 .01 .01 1.00 1.00 16.00 30.00 28.00 19.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 .01 2001: Q3... 100 1.10 9.00 23.00 25.00 25.00 12.00 3.00 1.00 .26 .01 * * * * 2002: Q3... 100 26.33 27.25 18.41 15.57 8.76 2.82 .49 .29 .06 * * * * * 2003: Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * * 2004: Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * * 2005: Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * * 2006: Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * * 2007: Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2007: Q1... 100 * * 7.64 19.40 38.92 28.70 3.97 1.02 * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.43 5.99 17.56 39.08 27.15 7.64 1.10 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * .71 5.44 30.65 35.13 19.80 6.25 1.48 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 7.53 22.95 27.42 25.90 14.22 1.65 * * * * * * * 2008: Q1... 100 9.82 19.42 36.70 20.50 9.19 4.03 * * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 25.50 26.97 29.46 12.17 4.47 .87 .56 * * * * * * *  Q3... 100 42.96 22.94 21.11 8.58 2.62 1.52 * * * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1756

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to make certain products

eligible for drawback and to simplify and clarify certain drawback provisions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 8, 2001

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to make

certain products eligible for drawback and to simplify

and clarify certain drawback provisions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNUSED MERCHANDISE DRAWBACK.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 313(j) of the Tariff Act

5 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 131(3j)) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘because of

7 its’’ and inserting ‘‘upon entry or’’;

8 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘because of

9 its’’ and inserting ‘‘upon entry or’’; and
2

•HR 1756 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(5) No prior notification of intent to export is

4 required to be provided to the Customs Service for

5 any exports under this subsection.’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of

8 this Act, and shall apply to any drawback claim filed on

9 or after that date and to any drawback entry filed before

10 that date if the liquidation of the entry is not final on

11 that date.

Æ