alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2109 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 590
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2109

                          [Report No. 107-273]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2002

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 11, 2002

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for 
            possible inclusion in the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY AND CRITERIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to 
as ``the Secretary'') shall conduct a study of Virginia Key Beach Park 
in Biscayne Bay, Florida, which was used for recreation by African 
Americans at a time when public beaches were racially segregated by 
law. The study shall evaluate the national significance of the site and 
the suitability and feasibility of establishing the site as a unit of 
the National Park System.
    (b) Criteria.--In conducting the study required by subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for 
potential inclusion in the National Park System contained in section 8 
of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5; popularly known as the National 
Park System General Authorities Act).

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Upon completion of the study, the Secretary shall transmit to the 
Congress a report on the findings of the study and the conclusions and 
recommendations of the Secretary.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 30, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 590

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2109

                          [Report No. 107-273]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Biscayne Bay, Florida, for 
            possible inclusion in the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 11, 2002

                       Reported without amendment
```
*Release Date: September 30, 2006*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

----

```
B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding real estate farm loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 12   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 6 | 4 | .055 | -.001 | .011 | .027 | .016 |
| 7    | 0                                      | 1                                                     | 2 | 4 | .031 | .000 | .003 | .009 | .017 |
| 16   | -1                                     | 0                                                     | 3 | 14 | .064 | -.003 | -.001 | .010 | .054 |
| 6    | -1                                     | 3                                                     | 0 | 5 | .022 | -.004 | .009 | .000 | .016 |
| 15   | 0                                      | 3                                                     | 5 | 7 | .051 | -.001 | .011 | .015 | .022 |
| 12   | -12                                    | 3                                                     | 8 | 14 | .037 | -.037 | .009 | .022 | .040 |
| 42   | 10                                     | 9                                                     | 5 | 17 | .123 | .030 | .027 | .014 | .049 |
| 35   | 8                                      | 6                                                     | 5 | 16 | .097 | .022 | .017 | .014 | .041 |
| 32   | 4                                      | 6                                                     | 8 | 14 | .082 | .010 | .015 | .021 | .034 |
| 18   | 1                                      | 5                                                     | 2 | 10 | .044 | .003 | .012 | .005 | .021 |
| 17   | 2                                      | 11                                                    | 4 | 0 | .039 | .005 | .024 | .009 | .000 |
| n.a. | 2                                      | 6                                                     | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | .003 | .012 | n.a. | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (1 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (252 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 8 Industrial Capacity  Item
Average annual rate
Fourth quarter to fourth quarter
Annual rate
Monthly rate2014June1972-79
1980-88
1989-94
1995-2014




2013
20142011
2012
2013
2014
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2Total industry
3.1
1.9
2.3
2.4
1.4
2.6
1.9
3.1
1.9
2.3
2.7
3.1
.3Manufacturing[1]
3.3
2.2
2.6
2.5
.5
2.2
1.8
2.2
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.2
.2Mining
.7
.1
-.6
1.2
5.9
4.8
4.0
9.2
4.1
4.8
7.5
9.0
.8Utilities
4.2
2.1
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.3
.4
1.0
.4
.6
.9
1.1
.1Selected high-technology industries
19.6
17.3
15.7
20.2
25.9
19.0
4.7
8.6
3.4
5.2
6.5
8.5
.8Manufacturing[1] ex. selectedhigh-technology industries
2.6
1.3
1.6
1.0
-.6
1.4
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
.1Stage-of-process groupsCrude
1.6
.4
-.5
1.1
4.6
3.5
3.1
7.3
3.2
3.9
5.9
7.1
.6Primary and semifinished
3.0
1.3
2.6
2.7
1.0
2.0
.7
1.9
.6
1.1
1.5
1.9
.2Finished
3.9
3.3
2.7
2.3
.5
2.6
2.9
2.3
3.0
3.0
2.6
2.4
.2   Return to table    Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
**
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify andrepresent that: 

 
 1.
A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as ofJanuary 23, 2019, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the “Agreement”) duringthe period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. 

 
 2.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. 

 
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By: /s/ Marc WomackName: Marc WomackTitle: EVP, Head of OperationsDate: March 31, 2022By: /s/ Erik LaneyName: Erik LaneyTitle: TreasurerDate: March 31, 2022**
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (99)

                        Report of Independent Auditors


Board of Directors and Shareholders
First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First Oak Brook
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of First Oak Brook
Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary at December 31, 1997 and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 20, 1998
#### Mary Gainey et al., Appellants, v Hubert Anorzej, Respondent.

[811 NYS2d 679]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated October 22, 2004, which granted the defendant’s motion, in effect, pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order of the same court dated June 7, 2002, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability upon his default in appearing or answering, pursuant to CELR 3012 (d) to extend his time to serve an answer and to compel them to accept his answer, and pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (5) to vacate and set aside an inquest on damages taken on July 12, 2002, at the conclusion of which the court awarded them damages in the principal sum of $100,000.

*651Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order dated June 7, 2002, and the damages award are reinstated.

The defendant does not deny that he had notice of the June 2002 order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability upon his default in appearing or answering the complaint. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant’s application which was to vacate his default in appearing or answering the complaint on the ground of excusable neglect pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1), made two years after he had notice of the order entered upon his default, should have been denied as untimely *(see Hartcorn v Hartcorn,*299 AD2d 395 [2002]; *Kachar v Berlin,*296 AD2d 479 [2002]; *Nahmani v Town of Ramapo,*262 AD2d 291 [1999]; *Matter of Brittany J.,*235 AD2d 310 [1997]).

Furthermore, in view of the absence of a reasonable excuse for the inordinate delay in appearing or answering the complaint, the failure to respond to the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the issue of liability, the failure to appear at the scheduled inquest *(see Trotman v Aya Cab Corp.,*300 AD2d 573 [2002]; *Habacht v Caroccia,*133 AD2d 338 [1987]), and the defendant’s pattern of willful neglect and default *(see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,*238 AD2d 568 [1997]), the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to extend his time to serve an answer and to compel the plaintiffs to accept it pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) *(see Andrade v Ranginwala,*297 AD2d 691 [2002]; *Jerrick Waterproofing Co. v Park Plaza Owners Corp.,*251 AD2d 628 [1998]; *cf. Friedman v Ostreicher,*22 AD3d 798 [2005]; *Trimble v SAS Taxi Co. Inc.,*8 AD3d 557 [2004]; *Goodman v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 2*AD3d 581 [2003]).

In light of our determination, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (5) to vacate and set aside the inquest on damages on the ground of vacatur of the order dated June 7, 2002, upon which the inquest was based, must also be denied. Cozier, J.P., Santucci, Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2044 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2044

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that the rates of the 
   basic allowance for housing for military housing areas inside the 
 United States are sufficient to eliminate out-of-pocket housing costs 
                 for members entitled to the allowance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                May 26, (legislative day, May 25), 2001

 Mrs. Davis of California (for herself and Mr. Snyder) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that the rates of the 
   basic allowance for housing for military housing areas inside the 
 United States are sufficient to eliminate out-of-pocket housing costs 
                 for members entitled to the allowance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Housing Fairness Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. USE OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING TO ELIMINATE OUT-OF-POCKET 
              HOUSING COSTS FOR MEMBERS.

    Section 403(b)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In prescribing the 
rates of the basic allowance for housing under this subsection, the 
Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the rates are sufficient to 
eliminate, not later than September 30, 2003, out-of-pocket housing 
costs for members entitled to the allowance to obtain adequate housing 
in that military housing area.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-30-1-2

Edward Brown and 

Elaine Brown

SEALED ORDER

While it may be a debatable legal and ethical point, still,

I think recusal in this case is both warranted and appropriate,

given the close circumstantial relatedness between the charged

offenses and reported public statements by the Browns and others

associated with them in the recent past. Because those public

statements included threats of violence and physical harm

directed at me, a reasonable person, fully informed of the facts,

might understandably question my ability to remain impartial in

this case, were I to preside. Strictly speaking, the charges

here do not include allegations of threats made against me (which

would unquestionably warrant recusal), but such distinctions

overlook practical realities. While I have no doubt about my own

ability to be impartial, I think the public interest is better

served by my recusal and reassignment of this case to a different

judge to avoid the risk of even an appearance of partiality.

The Clerk shall reassign the matter to a different judge.

Case 1:09-cr-00030-GZS Document 7 Filed 02/02/09 Page 1 of 2
2

This order shall be unsealed upon unsealing of the

indictments.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

February 2, 2009

cc: Arnold H. Huftalen, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00030-GZS Document 7 Filed 02/02/09 Page 2 of 2
38

C.5. Average Variable Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans1estate loans estate loans

 Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q1... 8.3 8.3 7.8

 Q2... 8.7 8.7 8.2

 Q3... 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q4... 9.0 8.8 8.3

2007: Q1... 8.9 8.8 8.2

 Q2... 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 8.1 7.6

2008: Q1... 6.9 7.0 6.6

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q1... 8.6 8.4 7.9

 Q2... 9.0 8.8 8.2

 Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.4

 Q4... 9.2 8.9 8.3

2007: Q1... 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q2... 9.1 8.8 8.2

 Q3... 9.0 8.7 8.1

 Q4... 8.5 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... 7.4 7.2 6.7

 Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2006: Q1... 8.9 9.0 8.6

 Q2... 9.1 9.1 8.7

 Q3... 9.3 9.3 8.8

 Q4... 9.4 9.4 8.8

2007: Q1... 9.2 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.3

 Q3... 9.1 8.9 8.8

 Q4... 8.3 8.4 8.4

2008: Q1... 7.5 7.6 7.7

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and

feeding of livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
##### 



Exhibit 31 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Exchange Rule 13a-14(a),
As adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Arch B. Gilbert, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of InterWest
Medical Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by the annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90
days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
Evaluation Date); andc.
    
    presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.  5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of the Companys Board
of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal controls.  6.
    
    I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. April 10, 2004/s/
Arch B. GilbertArch B. Gilbert
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 17
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from February 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has been made under my supervision. |
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2019-A |
#### John Kingston, Respondent, v Michael Breslin et al., Appellants.

[807 NYS2d 315]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is a shareholder of the defendant Atlantic-Heydt Corporation and its affiliates, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered May 27, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of*Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *Kingston v Breslin,*25 AD3d 657 [2006] [decided herewith]). Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.