alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 1 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 2 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 3 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 4 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 5 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 6 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 7 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 8 of 9Case 1:07-cv-00199-SM Document 6 Filed 09/04/07 Page 9 of 9
#### Daniel Hageman, Appellant, v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[808 NYS2d 763]

*761In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated June 28, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant’s renewed motion to vacate an order of the same court dated December 3, 2002, granting the plaintiff’s motion to strike the defendant’s answer upon the defendant’s default in opposing the motion and, upon renewal, inter alia, vacated the order and reinstated the answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To prevail on a motion to vacate, a defendant must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for its default and a meritorious defense *(see Amato v Fast Repair, Inc.,*15 AD3d 429, 430 [2005]; *Czarnik v Urban,*10 AD3d 627 [2004]; *Taylor v Saal,*4 AD3d 467 [2004]; *Searing v Anand,*127 AD2d 582, 583 [1987]). The determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse lies within the trial court’s discretion (see *Grutman v Southgate At Bar Harbor Home Owners' Assn.,*207 AD2d 526, 527 [1994]; *Perellie v Crimson's Rest.,*108 AD2d 903 [1985]; *Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*10 AD3d 393 [2004]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the excuse of law office failure proffered by the defendant was reasonable (see *Norowitz v Ponconco, Inc.,*96 AD2d 581 [1983]; *cf. Solovay v Paone Corp.,*219 AD2d 462 [1995]) and was supported by detailed and credible submissions explaining the defendant’s delays in responding to the plaintiffs discovery demands and in complying with court orders mandating discovery, as well as its failure to oppose the plaintiffs motion to strike its answer (see *Henry v Kuveke,*9 AD3d 476, 479 [2004]; *Gironda v Katzen,*19 AD3d 644, 645 [2005]). Although the defendant’s defaults were more than isolated incidents, it cannot be said, based on the evidence presented, that they constituted a pattern of willful default and neglect (see *Gironda v Katzen, supra; cf. Santiago v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., supra; Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,*238 AD2d 568, 569 [1997]). Moreover, the record sufficiently established the existence of a possible meritorious defense (see *Brown v Brause Plaza, LLC,*19 AD3d 626, 628-629 [2005]; *Castillo v Starrett City,*4 AD3d 320, 321-322 [2004]; *Salinas v Barney Skanska Constr. Co.,*2 AD3d 619, 622 [2003]). Accord*762ingly, the court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s renewed motion and in vacating its prior order and reinstating the defendant’s answer. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
IIB 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1606

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To amend section 507 of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

Lands Management Act of 1996 to authorize additional 

appropriations for historically black colleges and universities, to decrease the matching requirement related to 

such appropriations, and for other purposes.
2

HR 1606 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DECREASED MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR 

4 HISTORIC BUILDING RESTORATION AND 

5 PRESERVATION AT HISTORICALLY BLACK 

6 COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; AUTHORIZA7 TION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

8 (a) DECREASED MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—Sec9 tion 507(c) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Man10 agement Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–333; 16 U.S.C. 

11 470a note) is amended—

12 (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

13 following new paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), the Secretary may obligate funds made 

16 available under subsection (d) for a grant with re17 spect to a building or structure listed on, or eligible 

18 for listing on, the National Register of Historic 

19 Places only if the grantee agrees to provide, from 

20 funds derived from non-Federal sources, an amount 

21 that is equal to 30 percent of the total cost of the 

22 project for which the grant is provided.’’; and 

23 (2) by striking ‘‘(2) The Secretary’’ and insert24 ing the following: 

25 ‘‘(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary’’. 
3

HR 1606 RFS 

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 507(d) of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Manage3 ment Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 470a note) is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘Pursuant to’’ and inserting the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(1) 1996 AUTHORIZATION.—Pursuant to’’; 

7 and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATION.—In addi11 tion to amounts made available under paragraph 

12 (1), pursuant to section 108 of the National Historic 

13 Preservation Act, there is authorized to be appro14 priated such sums as may be necessary to carry out 

15 the purposes of this section.’’. 

16 (c) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—Subsection 

17 (c)(1) of section 507 of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

18 Lands Management Act of 1996, as amended by sub19 section (a), shall apply with respect to—

20 (1) funds made available under subsection 

21 (d)(2) of such section, as added by subsection (b); 

22 and 

23 (2) funds made available under subsection 

24 (d)(1) of such section, as amended by subsection (b), 
4

HR 1606 RFS 

1 that remain unobligated as of the date of the enact2 ment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2002. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alvin J. Catz, Chief Financial Officer of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Alvin J. Catz                              
|Alvin J. Catz                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director
|November 7, 2008                               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Western Pennsylvania
Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and will retained by Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



26
### NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 00 267

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

SONIA BEARD WHITAKER

, A ppellant

,

v.

HAZEL GUILLEN

, A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the County Court of

of Matagorda County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria

, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Before the court is appellant’s motion for free appellate record

. W e now ABATE

this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon

remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and,

thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. Whether appellant is indigent;2 2. Whether appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to indigency; and

3. Whether appellant has been provided a complete copy of the appellate record.

If the trial court determines that appellant is indigent and entitled to a free appellate

record, the trial court shall make any orders nece ssary to ensure appellant has the

opportunity to fully examine the appellate record.

The trial court shall cause its finding and recommendations, together with any

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental

cl erk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of

proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's

record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty

days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

9th day of September , 202 1

.
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2003: Q4... 8 33 59 6 61 33 16 5

2004: Q1... 7 25 68 5 52 43 8 4 Q2... 2 37 61 2 55 42 5 4 Q3... 15 47 38 5 63 33 10 5 Q4... 20 30 50 5 56 40 11 42005: Q1... 17 34 48 5 53 42 16 3 Q2... 17 58 25 5 62 33 8 5 Q3... 33 61 6 9 68 23 28 6 Q4... 26 32 42 4 55 41 18 5

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2003: Q4... 17 35 48 10 64 25 20 5

2004: Q1... 11 42 47 8 68 25 16 5 Q2... 11 49 40 9 65 26 15 6 Q3... 11 51 38 6 71 23 12 6 Q4... 10 40 50 5 60 35 9 52005: Q1... 12 48 40 5 59 36 12 5 Q2... 15 59 26 5 64 31 14 6 Q3... 35 52 14 15 54 31 34 5 Q4... 30 49 21 13 58 30 27 5

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2003: Q4... 29 25 46 17 71 13 25 4

2004: Q1... 17 52 30 13 74 13 26 5 Q2... 13 43 43 0 70 30 22 4 Q3... 5 36 59 0 73 27 9 4 Q4... 17 30 52 13 57 30 13 42005: Q1... 27 55 18 14 68 18 23 5 Q2... 13 50 38 8 58 33 8 5 Q3... 24 38 38 19 62 19 29 5 Q4... 24 29 48 14 62 24 24 4 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7595** 

MUHAMMAD AL

- MUJAHIDIN, a/k/a John Hamilton , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. DANIEL HAROUFF; DANIEL BUSH; D. ARROWOOD; CATHY JONES; MICHAEL MCCALL, In their indiv capacities; SCDC, in its official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort
. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 9:14

- cv - 01266

- BHH )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Muhammad Al

- Mujahidin , Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade , DOYLE, O ’ ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA , Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Muhammad Al

- Mujahidin seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary ju dgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (194 9). The order Al

- Mujahidin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006...... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

1997: Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
V

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2011

For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Ms. WOOLSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Zhenfu Ge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ZHENFU

4 GE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Zhenfu Ge shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

12 permanent resident.
2

•HR 2011 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Zhenfu Ge enters

2 the United States before the filing deadline specified in

3 subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered and

4 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi5 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact7 ment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Zhenfu Ge, the Secretary of State shall instruct

16 the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or

17 next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant

18 visas that are made available to natives of the country of

19 the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration

20 and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of

21 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

23 Act.

Æ
#### Allstate Insurance Company et al., Plaintiffs, and Jay A. Kranis et al., Appellants, v Burger King Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[808 NYS2d 74]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 20, 2003, which granted the cross motion by defendants A.J. Development and Lund Fire Products for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, and order, same court and Justice, entered February 4, 2005, which granted motions by the Burger King defendants dismissing the same cause of action, and by defendant 250-254 West 82nd Street Owners for summary judgment dismissing causes of action for breach of lease and negligent infliction of emotional distress, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Kranis plaintiffs had no viable cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress arising out of the negligent destruction of their property where there is no claim that plaintiffs themselves were in any physical danger *(see Curbean v Kibel,*12 AD3d 206 [2004]; *Golden v Manhasset Condominium,*2 AD3d 345, 346 [2003]; *Probst v Cacoulidis,*295 AD2d 331, 332 [2002]). The claimed exacerbation of plaintiffs’ preexisting medical conditions, caused by displacement from their home for nine months, is a consequential—not a direct— result of any negligence, and is therefore not compensable *(see Kennedy v McKesson Co.,*58 NY2d 500, 506 [1983]; *Probst,*295 AD2d at 332). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Sullivan, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
1. Gold held ‘‘under earmark’’ at Federal Reserve Banks for foreign and international

accounts is not included in the gold stock of the United States; see table 3.13, line 3. Gold

stock is valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce.

2. Special drawing rights (SDRs) are valued according to a technique adopted by the

International Monetary Fund (IMF) in July 1974. Values are based on a weighted average of

exchange rates for the currencies of member countries. From July 1974 through December

1980, sixteen currencies were used; since January 1981, five currencies have been used. U.S.

SDR holdings and reserve positions in the IMF also have been valued on this basis since July

1974.

3. Includes allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund on Jan. 1 of the year

indicated, as follows: 1970—$867 million; 1971—$717 million; 1972—$710 million; 1979—

$1,139 million; 1980—$1,152 million; 1981—$1,093 million; plus net transactions in SDRs.

4. Valued at current market exchange rates.

3.13 FOREIGN OFFICIAL ASSETS HELD AT FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS1

Millions of dollars, end of period

Asset 1996 1997 1998

1999 2000

Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. Mayp

1 Deposits .............................. 167 457 167 189 501 71 82 87 125 142 110

Held in custody

2 U.S. Treasury securities2 ................. 638,049 620,885 607,574 621,351 629,430 632,482 627,326 631,421 641,830 632,216 623,553

3 Earmarked gold3 ........................ 11,197 10,763 10,343 10,114 10,015 9,933 9,866 9,771 9,711 9,711 9,711

1. Excludes deposits and U.S. Treasury securities held for international and regional

organizations.

2. Marketable U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds and nonmarketable U.S. Treasury

securities, in each case measured at face (not market) value.

3. Held in foreign and international accounts and valued at $42.22 per fine troy ounce; not

included in the gold stock of the United States.