alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Robert H. Daskal    |
|----------------------------------------|
| Robert                H. Daskal        |
| Chief                Financial Officer |
| February                13, 2008       |

----
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3792

___________

Barbara Whitehead, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States of America, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 15, 1998

 Filed: May 21, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Whitehead appeals the district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 1

motion. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and conclude

Whitehead’s motion was properly denied. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2186 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2186

  To amend the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act to ensure 
 that States and local governments can quickly and safely remove flood 
  debris so as to reduce the risk and severity of subsequent flooding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

Mr. Goodlatte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act to ensure 
 that States and local governments can quickly and safely remove flood 
  debris so as to reduce the risk and severity of subsequent flooding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NONINTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL FLOOD DEBRIS REMOVAL 
              EFFORTS.

    The Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act is amended by 
inserting after section 4 (16 U.S.C. 590d) the following new section:

``SEC. 5. NONINTERFERENCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL FLOOD DEBRIS REMOVAL 
              EFFORTS.

    ``The Secretary of Agriculture and other executive branch officials 
and employees may not prohibit or condition the ability of a State or 
local government to remove from land or waters any rocks, vegetation, 
soil, or other debris deposited by flood waters when the primary 
purpose of the removal operation is to reduce the risk and severity of 
subsequent flooding.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02259-RPM

JACQULYN BISHOP,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and

YELLOW BOOK GROUP INSURANCE PLAN,

Defendants.

 

ORDER MODIFYING RULE 16 PROCEDURE - ERISA

 

Because this is an action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), no scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P.

16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary. As an alternative, it is

ORDERED:

That on or before November 23, 2011, counsel for the parties shall file a joint statement

addressing the following matters:

1. Whether the parties agree upon the contents of the administrative record.

2. Whether the parties agree upon the standard of review. If there is a

disagreement, state the parties’ positions.

3. Whether any discovery is necessary. If so, provide a statement of what

discovery is sought and why it is necessary.

4. Whether there is any reason to proceed in any manner other than to establish a

briefing schedule based on the administrative record.

5. Whether the parties are in agreement that the submission of the entire

administrative record is not necessary, understanding that those portions relied

upon will be submitted as appendices to the briefs.

Case 1:11-cv-02259-RPM Document 6 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
2

6. The dates for the filing of briefs addressing the issues.

If there is disagreement on any of these matters, the Court will set a conference to

resolve the disputes.

Dated: October 19th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

 ________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02259-RPM Document 6 Filed 10/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
                                December 31, 1998


The following significant subsidiaries are consolidated in the financial
statements submitted as a part of this report:





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Jurisdiction of        Percentage of
                                                Incorporation          Voting
                                                                       Securities
                                                                       Owned
<S>                                             <C>                    <C>    
Controlled by Campbell Resources Inc.:
       Meston Resources Inc.                            Quebec               100%
       Sotula Gold Corp.                                Canada               100%

Controlled by (i) Campbell Resources Inc. and           Mexico               100%
              (ii) Sotula Gold Corp.
       Oro de Sotula, S.A. de C.V.

Controlled by Meston Resources Inc.
       Minera Cerro Quema, S.A.                         Panama               100%
</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 866 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States Coast Guard 

whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United 

States have led to the Coast Guard seizing over 350,000 pounds of 

cocaine at sea during 2007, far surpassing all of our previous records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2007 

Mr. COBLE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the brave men and women of the United States 

Coast Guard whose tireless work, dedication, and commitment to protecting the United States have led to 

the Coast Guard seizing over 350,000 pounds of cocaine 

at sea during 2007, far surpassing all of our previous 

records. 

Whereas the estimated street value of the cocaine seized by 

the Coast Guard in 2007 is more than $4,700,000,000 

or nearly half of the Coast Guard’s annual budget; 

Whereas the Coast Guard’s at sea drug interdictions are 

making a difference in the lives of American citizens evidenced by the reduced supply of cocaine in more than 35 

major cities throughout the United States; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 866 IH 

Whereas keeping illegal drugs from reaching our shores 

where they undermine American values and threaten 

families, schools, and communities continues to be an important national priority; 

Whereas through robust interagency teamwork, collaboration 

with international partners, and ever-more effective tools 

and tactics, the Coast Guard has seized more than 

2,000,000 pounds of cocaine during the past 10 years 

and will continue to tighten the web of detection and 

interdiction at sea; and 

Whereas the Coast Guard men and women who, while away 

from family and hundreds of miles from our shores, execute this dangerous mission, as well as other vital maritime safety, security, and environmental protection missions, with quiet dedication and without want of public 

recognition, continue to show dedication and selfless service in protecting the Nation and the American people: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives honors the United States Coast Guard, with 

3 its proud 217 year legacy of maritime law enforcement 

4 and border protection, along with the brave men and 

5 women whose efforts clearly demonstrate the honor, re6 spect, and devotion to duty that ensures America’s parents 

7 can sleep soundly knowing the Coast Guard is on patrol. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 02-CV-0311-RPM-BNB

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,

a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

MOLYCHEM, L.L.C.,

an Illinois Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

vs.

CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY and

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION,

Counterclaim Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER DISMISSING COUNT II OF CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY’S

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

______________________________________________________________________________

THE COURT having considered Climax Molybdenum Company’s Motion to Dismiss

Count II of it’s Second Amended Complaint filed on October 3, 2006, statements of counsel

made by Climax Molybdenum Company and Molychem, L.L.C. at the hearing on motions on

October 20, 2006 and the minute order dated October 23, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED:

Count II of Climax’s Second Amended Complaint filed on May 31, 2002, claiming

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,235,261 for Method of Producing Ammonium Octamolybdate

Composition, is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 166 Filed 10/25/06 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
fees. This procedural dismissal with prejudice of Count II of Climax Molybdenum Company’s

Second Amended Complaint is not a substantive determination with respect to Count II of the

Second Amended Complaint and may not be used as res judicata, collateral estoppel, or issue

preclusion with respect to any claim or allegation made in the First, Second, Third or Fourth

Claims for Relief contained in Molychem L.L.C.’s Answer to Second Amended Complaint or

with respect to any claim or allegation made in Count I of Climax Molybdenum Company’s

Second Amended Complaint, alleging to infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,985,263 for

Ammonium Octamolybdate Composition and Method for Producing the Same.

Dated this 25th day of October, 2006.

s/Richard P. Matsch

_____________________________________

Richard P. Matsch,

United States District Court Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00311-RPM Document 166 Filed 10/25/06 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Antonio GUERECA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50479. D.C. No. CR-02-00064-GT.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 28, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Jose Antonio Guereca appeals his guilty plea conviction and 46-month sentence for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether a plea agreement has been breached. *United States v. Camarillo-Tello,*236 F.3d 1024, 1026 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Guereca contends that the government breached the plea agreement by indicating that he was a career offender on its initial Sentencing Summary Chart. The district court properly found that the government did not breach the plea agreement because the government fulfilled its obligations pursuant to the agreement and also that the agreement expressly made no promises as to Guereca’s criminal history category. *See United States v. De la Fuente,*8 F.3d 1333, 1340 (9th Cir.1993).

*682We dismiss Guereca’s appeal to the extent that he contends that the district court erred by failing to grant a “fast-track” downward departure because we lack jurisdiction to review a district court’s discretionary refusal to depart downward from the Guidelines. *See United States v. Webster,*108 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th Cir.1997) (finding district court’s statement that “I’ve searched the guidelines, and I, frankly, do not see any grounds for departure” indicated that district court found no reason to depart, not that she believed she lacked authority to do so).

Guereca’s contention that his prior conviction for a violation of Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11359 does not qualify as a career offender predicate is foreclosed by this court’s decision in *United States v. Sandoval-Venegas,*292 F.3d 1101, 1107 (9th Cir.2002). To the extent that Guereca invites us to revisit *Sandoval-Venegas,*we decline, as a three-judge panel cannot overrule Circuit precedent. *See United States v. Lucas,*963 F.2d 243, 247 (9th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
H. R. 1840

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

An Act

To extend eligibility for refugee status of unmarried sons and daughters of certain

Vietnamese refugees.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR REFUGEE STATUS.

(a) ELIGIBILITY FOR IN-COUNTRY REFUGEE PROCESSING IN

VIETNAM.—For purposes of eligibility for in-country refugee processing for nationals of Vietnam during fiscal years 2002 and 2003,

an alien described in subsection (b) shall be considered to be a

refugee of special humanitarian concern to the United States (within

the meaning of section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality

Act (8 U.S.C. 1157)) and shall be admitted to the United States

for resettlement if the alien would be admissible as an immigrant

under the Immigration and Nationality Act (except as provided

in section 207(c)(3) of that Act).

(b) ALIENS COVERED.—An alien described in this subsection

is an alien who—

(1) is the son or daughter of a qualified national;

(2) is 21 years of age or older; and

(3) was unmarried as of the date of acceptance of the

alien’s parent for resettlement under the Orderly Departure

Program or through the United States Consulate General in

Ho Chi Minh City.

(c) QUALIFIED NATIONAL.—The term ‘‘qualified national’’ in subsection (b)(1) means a national of Vietnam who—

(1)(A) was formerly interned in a re-education camp in

Vietnam by the Government of the Socialist Republic of

Vietnam; or

(B) is the widow or widower of an individual described

in subparagraph (A);

(2)(A) qualified for refugee processing under the Orderly

Departure Program re-education subprogram; and

(B) is or was accepted under the Orderly Departure Program or through the United States Consulate General in Ho

Chi Minh City—

(i) for resettlement as a refugee; or

(ii) for admission to the United States as an immediate

relative immigrant; and

(3)(A) is presently maintaining a residence in the United

States or whose surviving spouse is presently maintaining such

a residence; or
H. R. 1840—2

(B) was approved for refugee resettlement or immigrant

visa processing and is awaiting departure formalities from

Vietnam or whose surviving spouse is awaiting such departure

formalities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
exv10w5



 










EXHIBIT 10.5




February 9, 2004




Raj Nathan

SVP, Product & Technology Operations Group

Sybase, Inc.

One Sybase Drive

Dublin, CA 94568

(Delivered by hand)


Dear Raj:


The year 2004 marks our
20th anniversary and is a critical year for Sybase
growth. We have enjoyed several years of profitability, are cash flow
positive, and in the last six months, expanded our partner base to include
venerable companies like Intel and SAP. The Unwired Enterprise is our driving
strategy for 2004 — it is a pivotal part of extending growth in the IT
marketplace. We have exciting new products rolling out from every part of the
company, and the new Unwired Enterprise solution will define the mobile
enterprise category for the industry. We will need everyone’s help to ensure
that we make the most of our technology leadership and that we continue to
demonstrate a high level of unique value to customers and partners in all of
our programs.


Thank you for your contributions last year and ask that all of us keep sight of
the challenges ahead. More than ever, we need to remain focused and dedicated
to delivering growth and shareholder value required for Sybase to remain strong
and competitive.


Let me also inform you of your 2004 Executive Compensation as approved by the
Sybase, Inc. Compensation Committee at the February 4, 2004 meeting.




	 	1.	 	Cash compensation (effective January 1, 2004)





	 	•	 	Annual base salary: $340,000

(Paid semi-monthly at $14,166.67)
	 
	 	•	 	Incentive bonus target: 64.7% ($220,000)
	 
	 	•	 	Total target earnings (TTE): $560,000





	 	 	 	Your incentive bonus target will be based on Sybase, inc. overall
company performance as follows:





	 	•	 	50% on Sybase revenue of $817M
	 
	 	•	 	50% on Sybase profit before taxes (PBT) of $172




 









 




Raj Nathan

February 9, 2004

Page 2




	 	 	 	Payment of annual incentive bonus will be based on following:





	 	a)	 	Sybase revenue:





	 	•	 	70% at 95% of target performance
	 
	 	•	 	100% at 100%
	 
	 	•	 	3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
	 
	 	•	 	no cap





	 	b)	 	Sybase PBT





	 	•	 	70% at 70% of target performance
	 
	 	•	 	100% at 100%
	 
	 	•	 	3 for 1 after 100% (e.g. 130% at 110%)
	 
	 	•	 	no cap





	 	2.	 	Long-Term Incentives





	 	(a)	 	Sybase Stock Option Grant (4-year vest):





	 	•	 	60,000 shares





	 	(b)	 	Sybase Restricted Stock Grant (3-year cliff vest
with performance acceleration, i.e. from 3-year cliff vest to
2-year cliff vest if Sybase meets its 2004 budgeted revenue):





	 	•	 	8,000 shares at $0.10 per share.



I look forward to your contributions this year as we continue our pursuit of
maintaining integrity and credibility with our investors, customers, partners,
and employees.



Sincerely,



/S/ JOHN S. CHEN



John S. Chen

Chairman, CEO and President



	 	 	 
	cc:

	 	HR File
	edl
## 1 . ‘ .., /

:. :. : , . ‘ . :.” ,, ‘ . _ . ’
, 

# .

..I_ il:, : .q. I ;r..:.: : ‘ , 2. :..I . ‘ :,. ‘T:

ltaight htwe~.xmen

p&da:wherea in the Cat&q Club oaae. theAdJutant'OaneraL had m authorlty.to enter Into the eontraotthere tivolwd ao?: rae.thsicl

~an.av&able appmprIatlon out cd rhldh theyml&t hale bee&paid. : ; '. i

::,; . .._. 8 x:. .-

. . ‘ . 1. &morab&s O.-f. 8:,3i&l&on~~~go 4 .“’ ..:..,.._.

. . : ..::. i.. ‘ . . . ! “ ’ : Y ..: : ,.<.. s. SuttonlCat.ate

the rentaloithi lad omml by it&d famed bjrths.%uam Prison Syatm.%.rl934, under.the

olr-... .y -. ~*ix=atimoea

aw4eeorlbed **above.** . . . ,.



# .i. . . . AkMlp’ OoMYlmBa 0 **BY&**

**. .**  **..- .**  **’**
Case 1:11-cv-02249-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02249-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02249-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 4
Case 1:11-cv-02249-LTB Document 3 Filed 09/06/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

[JILL KELLY PRODUCTIONS LOGO]

NUMBER
JKP

                      JILL KELLY PRODUCTIONS HOLDING, INC.
                              A NEVADA CORPORATION

                                                                    COMMON STOCK

                                                                       SHARES

                                                               CUSIP 47741U 10 8
                                                                 SEE REVERSE FOR
                                                             CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



THIS
CERTIFIES
THAT




is the
owner of

      FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.001 PAR VALUE
                                 PER SHARE, OF

                      JILL KELLY PRODUCTIONS HOLDING, INC.

                              CERTIFICATE OF STOCK


(the "Company") transferable in person or by duly authorized attorney upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. The holder hereof accepts said
shares of common stock with notice of and subject to, the provisions of the
Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and all amendments thereto.
This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the
Transfer Agent and Registrant.

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Company and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated: 10-2-03                                                           10-2-03

       [JILL KELLY PRODUCTIONS HOLDING, INC. CORPORATE SEAL 1998 NEVADA]

/s/ Robert Friedland                                        /s/ Robert Friedland
     SECRETARY                                                    PRESIDENT


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
                   CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
                               (JERSEY CITY, NJ)
BY                                                                TRANSFER AGENT
                                                                   AND REGISTRAR

                                                              AUTHORIZED OFFICER