alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT-32**

 

**CEO        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In        connection with the Quarterly Report of Bexil Corporation (the “Company”) on        Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas B. Winmill, Chief        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:

 

1. The        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/        Thomas B. Winmill

Thomas B.        Winmill

Chief        Executive Officer

August 14,        2007

 

 

----

 

**CFO        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In        connection with the Quarterly Report of Bexil Corporation (the “Company”) on        Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas O’Malley, Chief        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:

 

1. The        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the        financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/        Thomas O’Malley

Thomas        O’Malley

Chief        Financial Officer

August 14,        2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert Clark, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00451-JL

Anabolic Resources, LLC, et al.

ORDER AFTER PRELIMINARY

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

April 17, 2009. The case proceeds against defendant Mass

Nutrition on Counts 15-22 only. Plaintiff’s counsel represented

that Robert Clark placed his order for the product from, and

ingested the product in, New Hampshire.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 10) is approved as

submitted, with the following changes:

• “DiBennedetto” disclosure deadlines -- August 1, 2009

• Summary Judgment –- February 15, 2010

• Trial –- June, 2010

The defendant will amend ¶¶ 7, 8, and 10 of its Answer to

more comprehensively state its positions with respect to the

corresponding allegations. Leave for the amendments is granted.

Case 1:08-cv-00451-JL Document 15 Filed 04/17/09 Page 1 of 2
2

As to the Mass Nutrition’s third affirmative defense,

assumption of the risk, when the matter proceeds to trial (or if

necessary, summary judgment motion practice), Mass Nutrition

shall specify whether the defense is based on release, primary

implied assumption, or secondary implied assumption.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: April 17, 2009

cc: Alan L. Cantor, Esq.

David P. Angueira, Esq.

Edward M. Swartz, Esq.

Robert J. Meagher, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00451-JL Document 15 Filed 04/17/09 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51078 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LEONEL JAIMES-MALDONADO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-01-CR-143-ALL-JN

-------------------- April 3, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leonel Jaimes-Maldonado appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to possession of a firearm by an illegal alien. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5). Jaimes challenges his base offense level of 20 under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A)(2000). Jaimes contends that he did not have a prior violent felony conviction that was punishable by a term of imprisonment in excess of one year as required by U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) and as defined in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.1).No. 01-51078 -2- “‘Prior felony conviction’ means a prior adult federal or state conviction for an offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, regardless of whether such offense is specifically designated as a felony and regardless of the actual sentence imposed .” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2, comment. (n.3) (emphasis added). Although Jaimes was sentenced pursuant to T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.44 as if he had been convicted of a Class A misdemeanor, Jaimes’s prior conviction for attempted assault on a peace officer, punishable by imprisonment for a maximum term of two years, qualified as a prior felony conviction of a crime of violence. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). The district court thus properly assessed Jaimes’s base offense level as 20. Jaimes’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED. AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-119-01-SM

Edward Torres

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 18) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the March 2009 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than January 9, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 20 Filed 12/24/08 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference: March 6, 2009 at 3:00 PM 

Jury Selection: March 17, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

December 24, 2008 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe 

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00119-SM Document 20 Filed 12/24/08 Page 2 of 2
36

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real- Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1estate loans estate loans

Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District (IL*, IN*, IA, MI*, WI*)

2006: Q2... 8.7 8.8 n.a. 7.9

 Q3... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.8

 Q4... 8.7 8.7 n.a. 7.7

2007: Q1... 8.6 8.6 n.a. 7.7

 Q2... 8.6 8.7 n.a. 7.7

 Q3... 8.4 8.4 n.a. 7.5

 Q4... 7.9 7.8 n.a. 7.1

2008: Q1... 6.9 6.7 n.a. 6.4

 Q2... 6.8 7.1 n.a. 6.5

Eleventh (Dallas) Federal Reserve District (LA*, NM*, TX)

2006: Q2... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.1

 Q3... 9.6 9.7 9.4 8.5

 Q4... 9.5 9.6 9.3 8.7

2007: Q1... 9.4 9.7 9.3 8.6

 Q2... 9.4 9.5 9.1 8.5

 Q3... 9.4 9.6 9.2 8.5

 Q4... 8.9 9.1 8.7 7.9

2008: Q1... 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.2

 Q2... 7.5 7.8 7.6 7.2

Fifth (Richmond) Federal Reserve District (MD, NC, SC, VA, WV*) 

2006: Q2... 9.0 9.2 8.8 8.8

 Q3... 9.3 9.2 8.8 8.6

 Q4... 9.3 9.3 8.9 8.4

2007: Q1... 9.1 9.0 8.6 8.3

 Q2... 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.5

 Q3... 8.7 8.6 8.2 8.2

 Q4... 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.5

2008: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Q2... 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2
37

C.4. Average Fixed Interest Rates on Farm Loans (continued)

Percent

Feeder cattle Other operating Intermediate non-real Long-term real

Quarter loans loans1-estate loans estate loans

 Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2006: Q2... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.2 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.2 9.0 8.4

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q2... n.a. 9.1 8.9 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 8.8 8.3

 Q4... n.a. 8.6 8.4 7.9

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.5 7.4 7.0

 Q2... n.a. 7.4 7.3 7.0

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2006: Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.1 8.5

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.0 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 9.0 8.9 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 9.0 8.8 8.3

 Q3... n.a. 8.8 8.7 8.2

 Q4... n.a. 8.3 8.2 7.7

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.1 6.8

 Q2... n.a. 6.9 7.0 6.8

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA) 

2006: Q2... n.a. 9.2 8.9 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 9.1 9.0 8.4

 Q4... n.a. 9.0 9.1 8.3

2007: Q1... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.3

 Q2... n.a. 8.9 8.8 8.4

 Q3... n.a. 8.7 8.6 8.0

 Q4... n.a. 8.0 8.2 7.8

2008: Q1... n.a. 7.2 7.4 7.2

 Q2... n.a. 7.3 7.4 7.2

 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of

livestock (including poultry).

 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District.

 n.a. Not available.

 Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1842

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications Commission and

local franchising authorities to regulate the rates for cable television service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 15, 2001

Mr. FRANK (for himself and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To reinstate the authority of the Federal Communications

Commission and local franchising authorities to regulate

the rates for cable television service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 The Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cable Consumer Rights

5 Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL.

7 Subsection (b) of section 301 of the Telecommuni8 cations Act of 1996 is repealed.
2

HR 1842 IH

1 SEC. 3 REINSTATEMENT OF PRIOR LAW.

2 Section 623 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47

3 U.S.C. 543) shall be effective as if section 301(b) of the

4 Telecommunications Act of 1934 had not been enacted.

5 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The provisions of this Act shall be effective 90 days

7 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1202

In Re: KRIS PLETSCHKE, d/b/a Raw Health,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

(CA-03-214)

Submitted: April 29, 2004 Decided: May 5, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kris Pletschke, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kris Pletschke petitions for a writ of prohibition. He

seeks an order preventing further legal actions against him in a

district court proceeding filed by the Federal Trade Commission.

A writ of mandamus or prohibition is available only when

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re

First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn., 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988).

Further, mandamus and prohibition are drastic remedies and should

only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United

States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d

818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus and prohibition may not be used

as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers, 595

F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). 

Because he does not have a clear right to the relief he

seeks, and because he may appeal any final adverse judgment in the

district court proceeding, the relief sought by Pletschke is not

available by way of a writ of prohibition. Accordingly, we deny

the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1887

To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain

annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police

and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the

adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would otherwise

be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the United

States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division

to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 17, 2001

Mrs. MORELLA (for herself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. HOYER, Mr.

MORAN of Virginia, Mr. PLATTS, and Mrs. MINK of Hawaii) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government

Reform

A BILL

To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000

to permit certain annuitants of the retirement programs

of the United States Park Police and United States

Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants

would otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion

of members of the United States Park Police and United

States Secret Service Uniformed Division to a new salary

schedule under the amendments made by such Act.
2

•HR 1887 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Law Enforce5 ment Pension Adjustment Equity Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADJUSTMENTS IN PENSION BENEFITS

7 FOR UNITED STATES PARK POLICE AND

8 UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNI9 FORMED DIVISION ANNUITANTS.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 905 of the Law Enforce11 ment Pay Equity Act of 2000 (section 905 of title IX of

12 division B of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001,

13 as enacted by reference in section 1(a)(4) of the Consoli14 dated Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554))

15 is amended by striking subsection (f).

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

17 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact18 ment of the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000.

Æ
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2023

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the rate of tax

on distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 25, 2001

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Mr.

WHITFIELD, Mr. FLETCHER, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky, and Ms. ROSLEHTINEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce

the rate of tax on distilled spirits to its pre-1985 level.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN RATE OF TAX ON DISTILLED

4 SPIRITS TO PRE-1985 LEVELS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 5001(a)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposi7 tion, rate, and attachment of tax) is amended by striking

8 ‘‘$13.50’’ and inserting ‘‘$10.50’’.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
2

•HR 2023 IH

1 (1) Subsection (a) of section 5010 of such Code

2 is amended by striking ‘‘$13.50’’ each place it ap3 pears and inserting ‘‘$10.50’’.

4 (2) Subsection (f) of section 7652 of such Code

5 is hereby repealed.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

8 of this Act.

Æ
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1994...... 10 1 1 3 6 .048 .003 .003 .013 .026

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... n.a. 2 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .005 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1995...... 9.9 8.7 9.9 8.5 26.5 10.0 9.0 10.8 12.1 8.2 1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2003: Q4... 11.4 9.0 9.9 9.4 24.0 15.7 7.9 10.4 10.6 12.3 2004: Q1... 14.1 7.9 12.4 11.6 28.9 16.8 9.8 12.9 16.0 13.9  Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gilbert Maurice Goudreau

v.

Elizabeth Ann Cyr

No. 06-fp-373

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby

granted, but only for the purpose of waiving the filing fee.

Plaintiff is ordered to provide the defendant’s address and

to amend to set forth his claimed basis for subject matter

jurisdiction.

This case has been assigned civil number 06-cv-373-SM.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 9, 2007

cc: Gilbert Maurice Goudreau

Case 1:06-cv-00373-SM Document 5 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 1

Goudreau v. Cyr Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E8-22349 Filed 9-19-08; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
#### Charles W. BUCKLEY v. John THERIOT.

No. 1363.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1934.

C. A. Blanchard, of Morgan City, for appellant.

Ellender & Ellender, of Houma, for appel-lee.

ELLIOTT, Judge.

In this case, for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases, entitled Charles W. Buckley v. Jean Pierre Dumond and Charles W. Buckley v. John Theriot, 156 So. 784, Nos. 10525 and 10528 on the docket of the district court, parish of Terrebonne, this day decided, the judgment rendered in the case of Charles W. Buckley v. John Theriot, No. 10528 on the docket of said court, is affirmed. The defendant, Theriot, to pay the costs in both courts.