alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UMG Recordings, et al.

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00090-JL

Mavis Roy

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

August 26, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00090-JL Document 19 Filed 08/14/08 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 14, 2008

cc: Christopher Cole, Esq.

Laurie J. Rust, Esq.

Peter S. Wright, Jr., Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00090-JL Document 19 Filed 08/14/08 Page 2 of 2
11-3794 Dabush v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. 

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 

# SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MU ST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 25 thday of October, two thousand twelve. PRESENT: AMALYA L. KEARSE, ROBERT A. KATZMANN, BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

_______________________________________ Amiel Dabush, Plaintiff-Appellant , v. 11-3794 The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Defendant-Appellee

.

_______________________________________ FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: Amiel Dabush, pro se , Weston, CT. FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE: Daniel J. Krisc h, John B. Farley, and Jeffrey F. Gostyla, Halloran & Sage LLP, Hartford, CT.

### 2 Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Thompson, J .). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED

. Appellant Amiel Dabush, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his claim brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment with the view that “[s]ummary judgment is appropriate only if the moving party shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P. , 321 F.3d 292, 300 (2d Cir. 2003). Upon such review, we conclude that Dabush’s appeal is without merit substantially for the reasons articulated by the district court in its well-reasoned order. See Dabush v. The Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. , No. 10-cv-67 (D. Conn. Aug. 15, 2011). We have considered Dabush’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED

. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
#### Hudy WILKERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7420.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 17, 1938.

J. S. Edmondson, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

William McClanahan, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before HICKS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and DRUFFEL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that there was not substantial evidence that the veteran, *1023Hudy Wilkerson, appellant, became totally and permanently disabled within the life of the War Risk Insurance policy sued on, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be, and the same is, affirmed.
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 1 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 2 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 3 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 4 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 5 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 6 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 7 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 8 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 9 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 10 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 11 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 12 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 13 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 14 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 15 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 16 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 17 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 18 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 19 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 20 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 21 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 22 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 23 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 24 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 25 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 26 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 27 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 28 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 29 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 30 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 31 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 32 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 33 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 34 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 35 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 36 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 37 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 38 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 39 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 40 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 41 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 42 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 43 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 44 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 45 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 46 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 47 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 48 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 49 of 50
Case 1:08-cv-01340-PB Document 1-2 Filed 02/08/08 Page 50 of 50
227 La. 84

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gilmer B. JEANE.

No. 42106.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 14, 1955.

Gilmer B. Jeane, in pro. per.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culli-gan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Stuart S. Kay, Dist. Atty., De Ridder, for appellee.

MOISE, Justice.

The defendant, Gilmer B. Jeane, was tried for the crime of having unlawfully sold alcoholic beverages, found guilty and sentenced to serve thirty days in the parish jail (which jail sentence was suspended on one year’s good behavior) and to pay a fine of $100. Alleging the unconstitutionality of the ordinance under which he was convicted, the defendant appealed to this Court. On the request of counsel, this Court remanded the case to the trial court and stated:

> “For the reasons stated it is ordered that this case be remanded to the district court for the purpose of receiving additional evidence to establish the correct wording of the ordinance involved in this prosecution, reserving to the defendant his right to level any attack he may deem proper thereto and urge any other defense he may wish to offer.” 225 La. 581, 73 So.2d 468, 469.

On the day set for hearing the appeal in this Court after the remand, counsel for the defendant was not present and did not file briefs in this Court.

*519Under circumstances such as these, the presumption is that the appeal has been abandoned. State v. Latino, 138 La. 14, 69 So. 857; State v. Ducre, 173 La. 438, 137 So. 745; State v. Simpson, 216 La. 212, 43 So.2d 585; State v. DeSoto, 221 La. 624, 60 So.2d 65; State v. Weaver, 222 La. 148, 62 So.2d 255; State of Louisiana v. Carter, 226 La. 57, 74 So.2d 902.

As this is a criminal case, we have made a most careful examination of the record and have found no prejudicial error.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
AutoCoded Document




AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     This
Amendment to Employment Agreement is made effective December 15, 2003.



     WHEREAS,
MERCANTILE TRUST & SAVINGS BANK, 440 Maine Street, Quincy, Illinois, an
Illinois banking corporation (“Employer”), and DAN S. DUGAN, 1025
Evangeline East, Quincy, Illinois (“Employee”), entered into an
Employment Agreement dated June 15, 1987; and



     WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee desire to amend the term of such Employment Agreement;



     NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings of the parties hereto it
is hereby agreed that the second sentence of Paragraph 1 of said Employment
Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following sentence shall be
substituted therefor:



	 	“Employment
hereunder shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue until December  31, 2006,
unless this Agreement is earlier terminated as provided in Section 4  hereof.”







     All
other terms and conditions of said Employment Agreement shall remain as set  forth in the
Employment Agreement dated June 15, 1987.



















     IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have caused this Amendment to Employment
Agreement dated June 15, 1987, to be duly executed, this 15th day of
December, 2003.



	 	Mercantile
Trust & Savings Bank







	 	By /s/ Dan S.
Dugan                  
      Its President







	 	/s/
Dan S. Dugan                        
      Dan S. Dugan, Employee







2
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned,
Michael W. Levin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00766-CV

F. S. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-12-001659, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant F.S.H. filed his notice of appeal on November 15, 2013. The appellate 

record was complete December 2, 2013, making appellant’s brief due December 23, 2013. To 

date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Amendments to the rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition 

of appeals from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a), available 

at http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/MiscDocket/12/12903200.pdf (providing 180 days for 

court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing 

deadlines. Therefore we order counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than January 17, 2014. If 

the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should not be 

held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on January 3, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Exhibit 10.42.1  


Schedule
of Omitted Documents in the Form of Exhibit 10.42, Including Material Detail in Which Such Documents Differ From Exhibit 10.42 


	1.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Bradley D. Edson.



	2.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Stuart A. Benson.



	3.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Donald C. Hannah.



	4.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Carson Beadle.



	5.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Leslie C. Quick, III.



	6.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Robert J. Eide.



	7.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and David Allen.



	8.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2003, between Vital Living and Marcus Feder.



	9.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2004, between Vital Living and Mitchel Feinglas.



	10.
	Indemnification
Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2004, between Vital Living and Michael Ashton. 



        The
form of the documents listed above does not differ in material detail from the form of exhibit 10.42 except with respect to the date of the agreement and the identity of the
director or officer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Juan Marquez,

Plaintiff

v. Civil No. 08-cv-522-SM

Ryan Levierge, Todd Gordon,

George Antilus, Nicholas

Granville, Jason Riley,

Ronald Potter, Vincent

Williams, John Does 1-5,

and Hillsborough County,

Defendants

O R D E R

A pretrial status conference was held on March 5, 2010. 

Michael J. Sheehan, Esq., appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. 

John A. Curran, Esq., appeared on behalf of the defendants.

The parties have not seriously discussed settlement, but

have at least initiated that process. The case is referred to

the Magistrate Judge for mediation after June 1, 2010.

Trial is rescheduled to commence with jury draw on August 3,

2010.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

March 5, 2010

cc: Michael J. Sheehan, Esq.

John A. Curran, Esq.

Elizabeth L. Hurley, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00522-SM Document 16 Filed 03/05/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT AUGUST 31, 1996 AND
THE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         556,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,063,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                   131,000
<INVENTORY>                                    828,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,459,266
<PP&E>                                       1,114,779
<DEPRECIATION>                               (813,479)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,100,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,414,786
<BONDS>                                        409,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,271
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,260,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,100,178
<SALES>                                      8,610,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,638,749
<CGS>                                        5,051,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,051,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               381,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,990
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,990
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1866 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1866

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 35, United States Code, to clarify the basis for 
            granting requests for reexamination of patents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW QUESTION OF PATENTABILITY 
              IN REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS.

    Sections 303(a) and 312(a) of title 35, United States Code, are 
each amended by adding at the end the following: ``The existence of a 
substantial new question of patentability is not precluded by the fact 
that a patent or printed publication was previously cited by or to the 
Office or considered by the Office.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any 
determination of the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark 
Office that is made under section 303(a) or 312(a) of title 35, United 
States Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF EARNINGS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FILED IN THE 1995 JEFFERIES GROUP, INC 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          68,318
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,408
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                        1,092,904
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            167,210
<PP&E>                                          26,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,536,969
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     227,757
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            851,254
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              82,932
<LONG-TERM>                                     56,322
<COMMON>                                            93
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,536,969
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               97,954
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            65,792
<COMMISSIONS>                                  178,248
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   73,493
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,365
<COMPENSATION>                                 195,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,238
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      53,238
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,529
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>