alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 54782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Gary W. 
Clem Inc. d/b/a ALMACO of Nevada, Iowa, an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent No. 6,147,503, ``Method For The Simultaneous And Independent 
Determination Of Moisture Content And Density Of Particulate Materials 
From Radio-Frequency Permittivity Measurements'', issued on November 
14, 2000.

DATES: (Federal Register) Comments must be received within thirty (30) 
days of the date of publication of this Notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Gary W. Clem Inc. d/b/a ALMACO 
of Nevada, Iowa has submitted a complete and sufficient application for 
a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing 
and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 
CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, 
within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-22196 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0598

_____________________________

SELVIN E. SHAW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Robert R. Wheeler, Judge.

January 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Selvin E. Shaw, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
*Release Date: September 30, 2008*

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

----

```
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
```

| Year | Estimated volume (billions of dollars) | Share of outstanding farm production loans (percent) |
|------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
||
| 93   | 6                                      | 19                                                   | 19 | 50 | .230 | .014 | .049 | .045 | .112 |
| 87   | 4                                      | 15                                                   | 24 | 45 | .198 | .008 | .036 | .051 | .095 |
| 126  | 18                                     | 37                                                   | 35 | 36 | .280 | .040 | .086 | .078 | .080 |
| 108  | 11                                     | 17                                                   | 34 | 45 | .259 | .027 | .041 | .075 | .098 |
| 308  | 67                                     | 53                                                   | 140 | 48 | .656 | .142 | .118 | .294 | .101 |
| 221  | 40                                     | 50                                                   | 58 | 73 | .471 | .085 | .114 | .124 | .157 |
| 175  | 34                                     | 35                                                   | 48 | 58 | .382 | .074 | .080 | .108 | .128 |
| 129  | 28                                     | 17                                                   | 46 | 38 | .284 | .062 | .039 | .099 | .081 |
| 59   | 8                                      | 16                                                   | 12 | 24 | .124 | .017 | .035 | .026 | .048 |
| 73   | 9                                      | 7                                                    | 23 | 34 | .146 | .018 | .015 | .045 | .064 |
| 90   | 8                                      | 13                                                   | 23 | 47 | .170 | .014 | .025 | .042 | .085 |
| n.a. | 12                                     | 20                                                   | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | .022 | .037 | n.a. | n.a. |
```
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported
amounts are adjusted to exclude foreign results for large banks that
report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal
definition of agricultural loans. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.
```

*Other formats:*
ASCII (2 KB)
PDF (3 KB)
CSV (2 KB)

Statistical releases

----

HomeEconomic research and dataAccessibilityContact Us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-216-PB

Shirley Bruce

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

June 3, 2008 trial in the above case so that the government may

dismiss the indictment in this matter upon sentencing in the

companion case, 07-cr-217-02-SM. The government does not object

to a continuance of the trial date. 

Accordingly, for the above reason, the court will continue

the trial from June 3, 2008 to October 7, 2008. In agreeing to

continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §

3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the ends of

justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

June 3, 2008

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Kenneth Glidden, Esq.

Peter Papps, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00216-PB Document 35 Filed 06/03/08 Page 1 of 1
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2008...... 13.8 9.5 12.3 9.1 30.6 21.7 9.2 11.1 12.6 14.6 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0 2008: Q1... 13.9 10.7 15.9 9.7 38.0 20.2 9.1 12.2 13.6 14.3  Q2... 14.8 8.2 8.9 9.7 24.4 25.7 10.7 11.7 11.9 16.3  Q3... 14.8 8.6 13.2 9.2 34.6 22.5 9.0 11.1 13.9 15.6  Q4... 12.0 9.7 11.7 7.6 29.2 18.7 7.9 9.5 11.5 12.5 2009: Q1... 10.8 9.7 9.6 8.3 36.8 14.0 9.6 12.5 14.6 9.9  Q2... 11.8 12.6 7.5 9.8 31.7 14.6 10.0 11.9 12.6 11.7  Q3... 11.7 7.0 7.7 8.8 35.0 15.8 8.7 9.7 10.8 12.5  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
7

A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersBillions of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 1 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1992...... 83.7 23.6 6.7 24.6 2.9 26.0 6.2 8.0 16.8 52.8 

1993...... 92.6 28.7 6.2 24.7 2.5 30.6 6.1 8.3 17.1 61.0 

1994...... 85.7 16.8 6.4 25.4 3.2 33.9 5.8 7.4 16.5 56.0 

1995...... 84.1 12.7 5.2 27.3 2.7 36.1 5.4 8.3 16.0 54.4 

1996...... 87.3 10.6 4.0 35.9 2.4 34.5 5.0 7.1 13.9 61.3 

1997...... 71.4 8.0 5.3 23.6 2.7 31.9 5.0 7.4 15.8 43.3 

1998...... 68.0 6.1 4.4 25.2 4.9 27.5 4.5 6.7 14.9 41.9 

1999...... 60.6 4.9 4.2 28.4 5.2 18.0 4.2 6.6 15.1 34.9 

2000...... 50.2 4.8 4.5 27.6 3.9 9.3 4.2 6.5 12.6 26.8 2001...... 51.6 5.1 4.7 21.7 4.1 16.1 3.7 5.9 12.6 29.3 

2002...... 56.2 5.3 5.1 28.8 2.9 14.1 4.1 6.3 14.3 31.5 

2003...... 51.1 7.9 4.5 24.5 4.3 10.0 3.4 5.3 13.5 28.8 

2000: Q2... 57.4 4.8 4.4 31.5 4.1 12.7 5.1 7.9 15.1 29.3 

 Q3... 42.6 5.1 3.7 23.4 3.0 7.4 3.8 6.3 11.3 21.2  Q4... 41.2 5.8 5.1 17.8 2.3 10.2 3.7 5.3 11.4 20.8 

2001: Q1... 54.3 3.6 4.3 23.7 4.7 18.0 3.3 5.7 13.9 31.4 

 Q2... 58.0 4.1 5.5 25.9 6.7 15.9 4.8 7.1 14.1 32.1 

 Q3... 38.6 4.1 3.5 17.7 2.8 10.5 3.7 5.3 10.2 19.5 

 Q4... 55.6 8.4 5.6 19.4 2.4 19.8 3.2 5.6 12.5 34.3 

2002: Q1... 58.5 6.5 5.4 28.5 3.4 14.7 3.3 5.8 16.1 33.2 

 Q2... 57.9 4.7 5.0 33.1 2.5 12.6 5.3 7.9 15.3 29.4 

 Q3... 56.4 3.3 4.1 29.4 4.3 15.3 4.3 6.0 12.7 33.4 

 Q4... 51.9 6.9 5.9 24.0 1.3 13.7 3.5 5.4 12.9 30.0 

2003: Q1... 60.8 8.8 4.5 30.0 6.1 11.4 3.1 5.6 15.3 36.9 

 Q2... 44.4 4.9 3.8 22.9 4.3 8.4 4.0 5.4 13.1 21.9  Q3... 43.9 6.6 3.6 20.8 3.9 9.0 3.3 4.8 11.0 24.7  Q4... 55.2 11.1 6.0 24.1 2.9 11.1 3.3 5.4 14.6 31.9 

 Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... 17 2 11 4 0 .039 .005 .024 .009 .000

2006...... 20 2 6 1 12 .042 .003 .012 .002 .023

2007...... 8 -3 0 5 6 .015 -.006 .000 .009 .011

2008...... n.a. 5 8 n.a. n.a. n.a. .008 .013 n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 26, 2013

NO. 03-12-00503-CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief, and, accordingly, has 

failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the 

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that 

this decision be certified below for observance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0542

MATTHEW WINKLER,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF BILLINGS,

 Defendant, Appellee

 and Cross Appellant.

SECOND ORDER OF 

MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

T. Thomas Singer, the mediator previously appointed in this matter, has notified 

the Court that he declines the appointment. Accordingly, Mr. Singer’s order of mediator 

appointment is hereby rescinded and

IT IS ORDERED THAT Thomas E. Towe, P.O. Box 30457, Billings, MT 

59107, (406)248-7337, towe@tbems.com, whose name appears next on the list of

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this December 10, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Gerry P. Fagan and Adam Tunning, P.O. Box 2559, Billings, TM 59103,

(406)248-7731, gerry.fagan@moultonbellingham.com,

Adam.tunning@moultonbelingham.com

Veronica Alyn Procter, P.O. Box 782, Billings, MT 59103, (406)294-8915,

vp@procterlawfirm.com

Thomas E. Towe, see contact information above

oqr.__6i.if

12/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0542
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Caldarone, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Calton, Inc.;

        2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

        4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

        (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
        the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

        5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

        (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls.



Date:  February 24, 2005

/s/ Anthony J. Caldarone
-------------------------
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
A.14. Survey of Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, Selected Quarters

Percent except as noted

USDA Farm Production Region

NE LS CB NP AP SE DL SP MN PA

Proportion of farm loans

outstanding, 2008 Q3 survey,

region share of national

total 2.7 8.9 25.4 22.7 7.7 5.4 4.9 8.4 5.6 8.4

Sample coverage, 2008 Q3

survey, sample share of total

regional loans 8.6 4.4 16.0 35.0 21.4 10.2 9.2 6.3 8.1 31.2

Avg. loan size, 2008 Q3 survey

(thousands of dollars) 25.5 23.5 41.9 106.6 64.3 325.2 41.9 59.6 43.1 130.7

Survey date Weighted average interest rate during sample week

2003: Q3 6.0 6.9 4.7 5.6 4.5 4.8 6.7 5.5 5.6 4.3

Q4 6.5 6.5 4.0 5.1 4.6 5.2 6.7 7.5 5.4 4.2

2004: Q1 5.8 7.0 5.2 5.7 4.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 5.7 3.8

Q2 4.8 6.3 5.2 6.2 4.6 6.4 6.9 6.2 6.4 4.1

Q3 6.2 6.6 4.8 5.5 4.8 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.7 4.9

Q4 6.2 6.4 5.2 5.4 5.1 6.0 7.5 6.4 7.0 5.2

2005: Q1 6.2 7.4 6.4 6.3 5.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.0

Q2 6.7 7.4 5.8 6.6 6.0 6.4 7.5 7.3 7.7 6.7

Q3 7.1 7.7 6.9 6.3 6.1 7.2 7.6 7.2 8.2 6.8

Q4 6.8 7.7 6.8 7.3 6.6 7.4 8.0 8.1 8.2 7.5

2006: Q1 7.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.7 8.5 7.8

Q2 8.4 8.3 7.7 7.9 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 7.8

Q3 8.2 8.7 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.5 9.0

Q4 9.2 8.6 7.4 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.8 8.9 9.1 8.9

(0.26) (0.24) (0.53) (0.38) (0.32) (0.63) (0.17) (0.18) (0.31) (0.14)

2007: Q1 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 9.3 8.9

(0.38) (0.27) (0.17) (0.41) (0.28) (0.41) (0.16) (0.28) (0.18) (0.07)

Q2 8.1 8.6 8.1 8.4 7.7 8.6 8.6 9.1 9.4 8.6

(0.16) (0.19) (0.41) (0.41) (0.31) (0.50) (0.11) (0.13) (0.12) (0.32)

Q3 10.4 8.6 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.9 8.9 9.5 8.6

(0.01) (0.42) (0.15) (0.35) (0.33) (0.44) (0.26) (0.17) (0.07) (0.30)

Q4 7.4 8.6 7.5 7.3 6.8 8.1 8.6 8.6 8.9 7.6

(0.01) (0.16) (0.25) (0.55) (0.47) (0.41) (0.17) (0.23) (0.15) (0.22)

2008: Q1 7.3 7.8 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.4 7.8 7.2 7.8 6.3

(0.14) (0.28) (0.14) (0.63) (0.66) (0.67) (0.72) (0.21) (0.23) (0.10)

Q2 7.4 6.6 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.7 6.9 6.4 6.3 5.1

(0.30) (0.09) (0.26) (0.89) (0.49) (0.29) (0.40) (0.30) (0.34) (0.25)

Q3 5.7 7.2 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.0 7.2 6.1 6.5 5.0

(0.93) (0.19) (0.31) (1.25) (0.37) (0.72) (0.20) (0.24) (0.36) (0.36)

Notes. NE is Northeast, LS is Lake States, CB is Cornbelt, NP is Northern Plains, AP is Appalachia, SE is Southeast, DL is

Delta States, SP is Southern Plains, MN is Mountain States, and PA is Pacific. The numbers in parentheses are standard errors.

They are calculated from 100 replications of a bootstrap procedure (resampling of banks) in each region.

19
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2185

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to purchase additional commodities for distribution; and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 14, 2001

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Ms. HART, Mr. COOKSEY,

and Mrs. EMERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to require the

Secretary of Agriculture to purchase additional commodities for distribution; and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Food As5 sistance Program Enhancement Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE COMMODITIES.

7 Section 16(h) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7

8 U.S.C. 2025(h)) is amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (1)(C)—
2

•HR 2185 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘REALLOCATION.—’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘REALLOCATION OF FUNDS; USE OF

3 FUNDS.—(i)’’, and

4 (B) by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(ii) Funds available under clause (i) that

6 are not reallocated under such clause, but not

7 to exceed $40,000,000 for such fiscal year, shall

8 be used by the Secretary to purchase and dis9 tribute commodities in the manner described in

10 section 27 and in addition to the dollar amount

11 specified in such section, except that not to ex12 ceed $10,000,000 of the funds available for use

13 under this clause shall be used by the Secretary

14 to pay for the direct and indirect costs of the

15 States related to the processing, storage, trans16 porting, and distributing to eligible recipient

17 agencies (as defined in section 201A of the

18 Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7

19 U.S.C. 7105)) of—

20 ‘‘(I) commodities provided by the Sec21 retary under this clause and section 27;

22 and

23 ‘‘(II) commodities secured from other

24 sources, including commodities secured by

25 gleaning (as defined in section 111 of the
3

•HR 2185 IH

1 Hunger Relief Act of 1988 (7 U.S.C. 612c

2 note)).’’, and

3 (2) in paragraph (4) by inserting ‘‘by the State

4 agency’’ after ‘‘used’’ each place it appears.

5 SEC. 3. RELATED AMENDMENT.

6 The 1st sentence of section 204(a)(1) of the Emer7 gency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7508) is

8 amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘administrative’’, and

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘storage,’’ after ‘‘processing,’’.

11 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall

13 take effect on October 1, 2001.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Mitchell Hanson

Criminal No . 09-cr-16-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

30) filed by defendant Hanson is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : March 13, 200 9

cc : Richard Monteith, Jr ., Esq .

Jeffrey Levin, Esq .

Mark Howard, Esq .

Joseph Caulfield, Esq .

Mark Zuckerman, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00016-JD Document 32 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 1