alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos AVALOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50250.

D.C. No. CR-01-00061-VAP-2.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 17, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Juan Carlos Avalos appeals his guilty plea conviction and 63-month sentence for *745possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Avalos has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Avalos has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<Page>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Armand Correia, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of The Dress Barn, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: March 18, 2005


/s/ Armand Correia
Armand Correia
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


                                      F-28
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Goldwasser, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)        The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                 amended; and

      (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.





August 14, 2002                 By: /s/ Mark Goldwasser
                                    --------------------------------------------
Date                                    Mark Goldwasser
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-2563

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Michael Ybarra, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 7, 2000 Filed: February 10, 2000

___________ Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Ybarra appeals his sentence for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. For reversal, Ybarra raises various challenges to the government's failure to move for a sentencing departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (1999), and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e).
We reject these contentions. Ybarra did not complain at sentencing about the lack of a departure motion, the plea agreement preserved the government's discretion whether to move for departure, and Ybarra made no substantial threshold showing the-2-

government

acted irrationally, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive. See UnitedStates v. Kelly , 18 F.3d 612, 617-18 (8th Cir. 1994); UnitedStates v. Romsey , 975 F.2d 556, 558 (8th Cir. 1992); UnitedStates v. Oransky , 908 F.2d 307, 309 (8th Cir. 1990). Ybarra also has not shown how he was prejudiced by the denial of his sentencing-continuance motion. See UnitedStates v. Ulrich , 953 F.2d 1082, 1085 (8th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Beede Site Group

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00319-JL

Leo P. LaRochelle, et al.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

October 27, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. will include a substantive,

meaningful discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. 

Counsel are expected to be prepared to engage in an open,

cooperative discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of

the obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

Case 1:08-cv-00319-WES Document 13 Filed 10/21/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: October 21, 2008

cc: Robert R. Lucic, Esq.

Thomas K. MacMillan, Esq.

Stephen H. Roberts, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00319-WES Document 13 Filed 10/21/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Levin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: November 13, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Michael W. Levin    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael W. Levin        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>

                                       Exhibit 11.1

     CARRINGTON LABORATORIES, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER
                           COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE


                           November 30,               December 31,
                           -----------   ----------------------------------------
                              1994          1994          1995           1996
                             ------        ------       --------       -------

   <S>                    <C>           <C>          <C>            <C>
   Net Income              $1,421,238    $ (70,069)   $(1,628,267)   $(5,522,672)
   Preferred stock 
     dividend requirement    (125,113)         -         (140,127)       (37,078)
                           -----------   ----------   ------------   ------------
   Income (loss) for 
     computing income per
     common share from 
     operations            $1,296,125    $ (70,069)   $(1,768,394)   $(5,559,750)
                           ===========   ==========   ============   ============
   Weighted average common
     and common equivalent
     shares outstanding     7,340,982    7,344,390      7,932,675      8,798,211
                           ===========   ==========   ============   ============
   Net income per common 
     and common equivalent
     share outstanding     $      .18    $    (.01)   $      (.22)   $      (.63)
                           ===========   ==========   ============   ============
</TABLE>
[FN]
(1) Common stock equivalents have been excluded since the effect of net income
(loss) per share of their inclusion would be either antidilutive or represent a
dilution of less than 3%.
#### Sause *v.*Cities Service Oil Co.

(No. 24535

— Decided March 14, 1934.)

*50*Mr. John Ruff alo*and *Mr. C. J. Wall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Manchester, Ford, Bennett & Powers*and *Messrs. Cull, Fuller & Laughlin,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

*■*Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1995...... .6 .2 .3 .1 .2 2.4 1.0 1.4 .5 .9

1996...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997...... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

1996: Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.8 1.1 1.7 .7 1.0

1997: Q1... .8 .4 .4 .2 .2 3.2 1.4 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.8 1.0 1.8 .8 1.0

 Q3... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.3 .8 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.6 1.1 1.5 .6 .9

1998: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .2 .3 3.5 1.6 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .2 .2 2.6 1.0 1.6 .8 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .2 .2 2.5 .9 1.6 .7 .9

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999: Q1... 1.1 .5 .6 .3 .3 3.6 1.6 2.0 .9 1.0

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .8 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .8 1.5 .7 .8

 Q4... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This document contains summary financial information extracted from the attached
quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended  December 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         933
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,482
<INVENTORY>                                    86,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,810
<PP&E>                                         47,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 327,404
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          90,471
<BONDS>                                        132,021
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0     
<COMMON>                                       143
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   327,404
<SALES>                                        113,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,513
<CGS>                                          88,907 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               434  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,570 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,471 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,099 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,099 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.36
        


</TABLE>
11

A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans, by Effective Interest RatePercent

Effective interest rate (percent)

Zero 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 

All to to to to to to to to to to to to to to 

Quarter rates 4.9 5.9 6.9 7.9 8.9 9.9 10.9 11.9 12.9 13.9 14.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 1995: Q4... 100 * .01 10.00 12.00 11.00 30.00 25.00 9.00 1.00 1.00 .01 * .01 * 1996: Q4... 100 * .01 19.00 8.00 27.00 25.00 16.00 4.00 1.00 .01 * .01 .01 * 1997: Q4... 100 * .01 5.00 6.00 34.00 31.00 16.00 6.00 1.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 1998: Q4... 100 .01 .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 * * * 1999: Q4... 100 .01 .01 3.00 9.00 30.00 36.00 17.00 5.00 1.00 .01 .01 * * * 2000: Q4... 100 * .01 .01 3.00 15.00 30.00 34.00 13.00 4.00 .01 .01 .01 * * 2001: Q4... 100 21.20 32.80 13.60 16.40 10.50 4.10 .90 .30 .10 .00 .00 * * * 2002: Q4... 100 38.69 23.76 14.20 12.97 7.73 2.02 .44 .04 .04 .04 .02 .02 * * 2003: Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * * 2003: Q2... 100 27.25 23.90 21.19 18.64 6.55 1.77 .51 .08 .08 * .03 * * *  Q3... 100 41.83 23.79 18.38 11.11 3.67 .77 .22 .04 .04 .02 .02 .02 * *  Q4... 100 46.26 21.96 16.40 10.95 3.03 1.10 .25 * .02 * .02 * * * 2004: Q1... 100 43.84 22.35 17.33 11.30 3.56 1.16 .27 .05 .05 * .07 .02 * *  Q2... 100 42.54 25.54 17.44 10.50 3.02 .61 .25 .02 .05 * .02 * * *  Q3... 100 36.91 26.22 18.99 12.61 3.57 1.35 .27 .05 * .02 * * * *  Q4... 100 31.55 30.94 19.15 11.56 4.82 1.21 .67 .04 .02 .04 * * * * 2005: Q1... 100 11.07 19.85 27.21 29.30 11.22 1.06 .17 .13 * * * * .00 .00  Q2... 100 6.46 19.30 39.57 24.01 8.33 1.98 .19 .13 .02 * * .00 * *  Q3... 100 8.94 14.99 34.66 24.51 14.68 1.94 .21 .05 .02 .01 .01 * * *  Q4... 100 .68 6.95 26.62 32.48 25.80 6.63 .70 * * * * * * * 2006: Q1... 100 * 2.78 14.02 34.59 34.39 12.26 1.44 * * * * * * *  Q2... 100 * 1.04 14.21 34.09 30.67 15.91 3.24 .56 * * * * * *  Q3... 100 * * 5.27 21.96 34.82 30.67 5.70 1.12 * * * * * *  Q4... 100 * 3.32 10.48 17.65 39.46 21.03 7.27 .65 * * * * * *  Note. Non-real-estate farm loans of $1,000 or more made by insured commercial banks. Effective (compounded) annual interest from the stated rate and other terms of the loans and weighted by loan size. Percentages may not sum to 100 because of rounding. * Indicates value of zero. Source. Federal Reserve Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers, conducted during the first full business week of the sequarter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6921

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AHMED YOUNG, a/k/a Touche,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-97-404-A, CA-00-916-AM)

Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmed Young, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Young seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and

his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Young,

Nos. CR-97-404-A; CA-00-916-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2000; filed

May 17, 2001; entered May 18, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 12650 McManus Blvd, Suite 103, Newport News, VA 23602, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products and organic chemicals for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov*. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​*.                     

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 07, 2008. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2011. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randall Breaux, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-1060. 

Dated: September 16, 2008. 

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. E8-22221 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P