alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 9, 2010

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|NORTHAMPTON CO-OPERATIVE BANK | * Branch       | Northampton Cooperative Bank, Northampton, Massachusetts - application to establish a new branch office at 390 College Street, Amherst, Massachusetts | Newspaper:01/21/2010Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 01/21/2010    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin T. Michaels, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: January 16, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS                                                 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Kevin T. Michaels Chief Financial Officer Powerwave Technologies,
Inc.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the “Servicer”),
does hereby certify and represent that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2019, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA
Inc., Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:                      
| |                            
| | By:                        
| | Name:                      
| | Title:                     
| | Date:
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: January 08, 2007
<PAGE>

                            LARSCOM INCORPORATED

EXHIBIT 11.1

                            LARSCOM INCORPORATED
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended June 30,    Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                        ---------------------------    -------------------------
                                                            1997           1996           1997           1996
                                                        ------------    -----------    ----------     ----------
                                                                               (Unaudited)
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>
 Net income                                              $  2,541       $  2,190       $  3,875      $  2,547
                                                         --------       --------       --------      --------
 Weighted average shares outstanding:
 Class A and B Common Stock                                18,076         14,193         18,038        14,193
                                                         --------       --------       --------      --------

 Pro forma net income per share (1)                      $   0.14       $   0.15       $   0.21      $   0.18
                                                         --------       --------       --------      --------

</TABLE>

(1)  Net income per share for the three  and six months ended June 30, 1996 
is supplemental and is calculated as described in Note 1 of the Notes to the 
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of the Company's 
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

34 Franklin Street, LLC

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00478-JL

Grace Fellowship of

Nashua, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference currently scheduled for

May 4, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. will include a substantive, meaningful

discussion of the parties’ claims and defenses. Counsel are

expected to be prepared to engage in an open, cooperative

discussion in good faith. Counsel are reminded of the

obligations imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(3) and (4), and

should be prepared to explain the factual basis underlying any

claims or defenses they have pleaded.

Each party shall be represented at the Preliminary Pretrial

Conference by counsel authorized to bind the party on all

matters.

To the extent that the substance of this order constitutes a

departure from the customary Preliminary Pretrial practice to

Case 1:08-cv-00478-JL Document 15 Filed 04/27/09 Page 1 of 2
2

which counsel are accustomed, the court apologizes for the short

notice, and will bear this in mind at the conference.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: April 27, 2009

cc: Alexander G. Rheaume, Esq.

Dennis E. McKenna, Esq.

John F. Bisson, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00478-JL Document 15 Filed 04/27/09 Page 2 of 2
|What's New · 
   What's Next · 
   Site Map · 
   A-Z Index ·
   Careers ·
   RSS ·
   All Videos ·
   Current FAQs ·
   Contact Us |  | Search  Advanced Search | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 

Aboutthe Fed
    News& Events
    MonetaryPolicy
    BankingInformation& Regulation
    PaymentSystems
    EconomicResearch& Data
    Consumer Information
    CommunityDevelopment
    ReportingForms
    Publications


skip to content 
 Home Economic Research & Data Statistical Releases and Historical Data
 DDP Print
   Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization - G.17 Current Release
  Release Dates
  Monthly Supplement
  Annual Revision
  Data Download
  About
  Announcements
  Technical Q&As
 Current Release  (273 KB PDF)
(ASCII)  Table 3 Motor Vehicle Assemblies  Item
2014Average
2014
2015Q1
2014
2015Q2
Q3
Q4
Nov.
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.Total
11.66
11.67
12.19
11.73
11.48
12.12
11.93
11.73
10.98
11.72
12.02Autos
4.25
4.15
4.44
4.33
4.04
4.46
4.55
4.07
3.83
4.21
4.30Trucks
7.41
7.52
7.75
7.40
7.44
7.66
7.38
7.66
7.14
7.50
7.72Light
7.12
7.22
7.44
7.11
7.12
7.35
7.10
7.35
6.83
7.17
7.40Medium and heavy
.29
.29
.31
.29
.32
.31
.28
.31
.31
.34
.32Memo:Autos and light trucks
11.37
11.38
11.88
11.44
11.16
11.81
11.64
11.42
10.67
11.38
11.71      Return to top
   Home Economic research and data
 Accessibility Contact Us Disclaimer  Linking Policy FOIA
 PDF Reader
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Scheufler, Appellant.

[806 NYS2d 431]

Appela by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), rendered October 21, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third-degree and criminal trespass in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 190

To clarify the effect on the citizenship of an individual of the individual’s

birth in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Mr. STUMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To clarify the effect on the citizenship of an individual of

the individual’s birth in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BASIS OF CITIZENSHIP CLARIFIED.

4 In the exercise of its powers under section 5 of the

5 Fourteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of

6 the United States, the Congress has determined and here7 by declares that any person born after the date of enact8 ment of this Act to a mother who is neither a citizen or

9 national of the United States nor admitted to the United

10 States as a lawful permanent resident, and which person
2

•HR 190 IH

1 is a citizen or national of another country of which either

2 of his or her natural parents is a citizen or national, or

3 is entitled upon application to become a citizen or national

4 of such country, shall be considered as born subject to the

5 jurisdiction of that foreign country and not subject to the

6 jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of

7 section 1 of such Article and shall therefore not be a cit8 izen of the United States or of any State solely by reason

9 of birth in the United States.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000696

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
BANK OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID K. BRAXTON, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

WAILUKU DIVISION (CASE NO. 2DRC-22-0000043)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that:(1) On November 16, 2022, self-represented DefendantAppellant David K. Braxton (Braxton) filed a Notice of Appeal and a request for the district court to waive the filing fee;

(2) On November 18, 2022, the district court denied the request for a fee waiver;

(3) The record on appeal was due on or before January 17, 2023, but was not filed because Braxton failed to pay the filing fee or obtain a fee waiver. Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rules 3(a), 11(b)(2), 24;

(4) On January 18, 2023, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing Braxton that the time to docket the appeal had expired, Braxton had not paid the filing fee or obtained an order allowing Braxton to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's attention on January 30, 2023, for action that may include dismissal of the appeal, and Braxton could seek relief from default by motion; Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-22-0000696 19-MAY-2023 08:38 AM Dkt. 14 ODSDNOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) Braxton took no further action in this appeal; and (6) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis . HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 19, 2023. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

2
(January 5, 2006)

#### Eugene Hennessey, Plaintiff, v Restaurant Associates, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 349]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard E Braun, J), entered July 26, 2005, which denied third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the third-party complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the third-party defendant dismissing the third-party complaint.

In this personal injury action which resulted from an accident involving a butane cannister gas stove in a cafeteria operated by defendant and third-party plaintiff Restaurant Associates, the IAS court erred when it denied third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss the first and second causes of action in the third-*341party complaint. Restaurant Associates based its third-party liability claims against its landlord, third-party defendant New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), on negligent spoliation of evidence. While NYMEX apparently came into possession of the gas stove involved in the accident, there is no record evidence which would indicate that NYMEX did so at Restaurant Associates’ request, that NYMEX did so in such a manner as to create a bailment, or that NYMEX acted in any manner contrary to Restaurant Associates’ property interest, if any, in the stove. NYMEX was never notified of the impending lawsuit and was not asked for the stove by Restaurant Associates until four years after the accident. Restaurant Associates made no effort to preserve the stove or seek a court order in a timely manner. NYMEX was not a party to the underlying lawsuit, was not alleged to have committed or contributed to any wrongdoing causing the accident, and had no relationship with Restaurant Associates requiring it to preserve the stove; therefore, NYMEX can have no potential liability. Absent some duty to preserve evidence, there is no cause of action for negligent spoliation *(MetLife Auto & Home v Joe Basil Chevrolet,*1 NY3d 478, 483-484 [2004]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1995...... 100.0 1.4 5.7 37.1 39.6 13.4 2.3 .6 11.2 12.1 1.2 1.2 1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2001: Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.6 5.4 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.2 7.9 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02232-RPM

ESTATE OF CONSTANCE L. LUCAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

HCA 401(k) PLAN and/or HCA HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

_____________________________________________________________________

The Court having determined that a pretrial conference should now be

scheduled, it is

ORDERED that a pretrial conference is scheduled for September 13, 2012, at

2:00 p.m. in the Conference Room, Second Floor, the Byron White United States

Courthouse, 1823 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel are directed to comply with

the Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Final Pretrial Order which may be

found at www.cod.uscourts.gov/judges_frame.htm. The proposed Final Pretrial

Order, original only, shall be delivered in paper form directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. 

on September 6, 2012. The conference is conducted with lead counsel present in

person. No parties or representatives of parties will be permitted to attend.

DATED: August 9th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02232-RPM Document 20 Filed 08/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02249-LTB

RAHEEM DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Default Judgment Motion Pursuant

to Rule 55" (Doc. No. 16) filed on November 18, 2011. This case was dismissed by an

Order and Judgment filed on November 16, 2011. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s motion is

DENIED as moot.

Dated: November 30, 2011

 

Case 1:11-cv-02249-LTB Document 17 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1