alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0088. STEVEN LEE CARGLE v. JESSICA N. HARVILL.

The trial court entered a final judgment and decree of divorce in this action on

July 27, 2020. On October 9, 2020, defendant Steven Cargle filed this application for

discretionary review. We lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga.

App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Cargle filed this application more than two

months after entry of the divorce decree he seeks to appeal. Consequently, this

untimely application for discretionary review is hereby DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction. See id. If, as Cargle appears to suggest in his application, his right to

timely seek appellate review was frustrated due to a trial court error, his remedy is to

petition the trial court to vacate and re-enter the order at issue in the manner described

in Cambron v. Canal Ins. Co., 246 Ga. 147, 148-149 (1) (269 SE2d 426) (1980),

disapproved in part by Wright v. Young, 297 Ga. 683, 684, n. 3 (777 SE2d 475)

(2015).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 02, 2020

11/02/2020
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 3rd day of May, 2010.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         110,544
<SECURITIES>                                    61,304
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (260)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,085
<PP&E>                                         500,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,215
<BONDS>                                         83,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,980<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,600<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,921
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,504
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,504
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85
<FN>
<F1>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $19,500 ALLOCABLE TO 195,000 SHARES OF TREASURY STOCK.
<F2>REDUCED BY APPROXIMATELY $4,196,000 ALLOCABLE TO 195,000 SHARES OF TREASURY
STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1






              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





May 11, 2007
                                           /s/ Richard J. Lampen
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Richard J. Lampen
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 09-cr-28-PB

Frederick Gilbert

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for June 2, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to negotiate a plea agreement. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from June 2, 2009 to August 18, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:09-cr-00028-PB Document 13 Filed 05/08/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The May 28, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued to 

July 30, 2009 at 3:15 p.m. 

No further continuances. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

May 8, 2009

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Joseph Caulfield, Esq.

Debra Walsh, Esq.

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:09-cr-00028-PB Document 13 Filed 05/08/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-117-01-SM

Frank Emery

O R D E R

Defendant Emery’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 14). Trial has been rescheduled for the August 2007

trial period. Defendant Emery shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later

than July 9, 2007. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be

effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: August 1, 2007 at 3:00 p.m.

Jury Selection: August 7, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:07-cr-00117-SM Document 15 Filed 06/27/07 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

June 27, 2007

cc: Mark Sisti, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00117-SM Document 15 Filed 06/27/07 Page 2 of 2
29

B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures

Year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

1987...... 22 19 12 16 69

1988...... 11 6 12 7 36

1989...... 5 7 5 5 22

1990...... 3 5 6 3 17

1991...... 2 2 3 1 8

1992...... 1 1 1 4 7

1993...... 1 2 2 0 5

1994...... 0 0 0 0 0

1995...... 0 0 0 0 0

1996...... 0 2 0 0 2

1997...... 0 0 0 1 1

1998...... 0 0 1 0 1

1999...... 0 1 0 0 1

2000...... 0 0 0 0 0

2001...... 0 0 0 0 0

2002...... 1 0 0 1 2

2003...... 0 1 0 0 1

2004...... 0 1 0 0 1

2005...... 0 0 0 0 0

2006...... 0 0 0 0 0

2007...... 0 0 0 0 0

2008...... 1 0 0 2 3

 Note. Data exclude banks assisted to prevent failure. Industrial banks and

mutual savings banks also are excluded. Agricultural banks are defined in

the introduction to section B.

 n.a. Not available.
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... 17 2 11 4 0 .039 .005 .024 .009 .000

2006...... 20 2 6 1 12 .042 .003 .012 .002 .023

2007...... 8 -3 0 5 6 .015 -.006 .000 .009 .011

2008...... 54 5 8 12 29 .093 .008 .013 .020 .046

2009...... n.a. 33 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. .051 n.a. n.a. n.a.

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jeffrey C. O’Neil

v. Civil No. 08-cv-396-SM

Hillsborough County Department

of Corrections, Superintendent, et al

O R D E R

An evidentiary hearing on plaintiff’s preliminary injunction

request will be heard on March 3, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. Defendant

O’Mara is ordered to produce plaintiff’s medical file at the

hearing. The Clerk is directed to order transport of plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 23, 2009

cc: Jeffrey O’Neil, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00396-SM Document 9 Filed 02/23/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

v. Case No. 08-cr-135-01-SM

Normand Forand

ORDER

Re: Document No. 67, Motion to Appoint [New] Counsel

Ruling: Denied, without prejudice. The motion does not 

provide grounds justifying the appointment of substitute counsel. 

The final revocation hearing was continued on defendant's motion, 

to facilitate his successful completion of the Therapeutic Community 

Program. Presumably defendant is enrolled in and successfully 

participating in that program, leaving little for counsel to attend 

to until he completes it. A copy of defendant's motion shall be 

forwarded to counsel with the expectation that counsel will discuss 

the issues raised with the defendant. 

Date: September 5, 2012 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Paul J. Garrity, Esq. 

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation 

Norman Forand

Case 1:08-cr-00135-SM Document 69 Filed 09/05/12 Page 1 of 1
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 5 , 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00699

- CV

WILLIAM SATTERWHITE, JR. , Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER EVANS AN D YI ZHANG , Appellee s

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1059593

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 12 , 2015. The notice of appeal was filed August 13 , 201 5 . To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207.2

On September 22, 2015 , this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fe e on or before October 7 , 2015, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered
dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has faile d to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby and Brown

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Karen L. Bartlett, et al. 

v. Civil No. 08-cv-358-JL 

Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc., et al. 

ORDER 

R e: Document No. 92 , Motion to Clarify 

Ruling: Denied. The court will fashion a remedy, if 

warranted, without the proffered evidence. While the court 

expressed an inclination to grant the motion for sanctions, it has 

not yet done so, and will entertain the merits of the motion at the 

hearing. No inference should be drawn from the 90-minute time 

allotment regarding the actual length of the hearing, or “time per 

side.” This is not an appellate court oral argument. The hearing 

will be as long or as short as necessary, with no specific 

allotment of time “per side.” Further, the defendant is advised 

that the court does not accept the proposition that a waiver of the 

attorney client privilege would necessarily result from a more 

specific description of counsel’s efforts to identify and locate 

the annual and periodic reports in question. 

/ s / Joseph N. Laplante 

Joseph N. Laplante 

U.S. District Judge 

Date: October 22 , 2009 

cc: Bryan Ballew, Esq. 

Keith Jensen, Esq. 

Patrick O’Neal, Esq. 

Christine Craig, Esq. 

Timothy Beaupre, Esq. 

Jeffrey Geoppinger, Esq. 

Joseph Thomas, Esq. 

Linda Maichl, Esq. 

Paul Cosgrove, Esq. 

Stephen Judge, Esq. 

Case 1:08-cv-00358-JL Document 93 Filed 10/22/09 Page 1 of 1
#### Mrs. Pearl Delrie VASCOCU et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 7845.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 10, 1952.

Russell E. Gahagan, G. F. Thomas, Jr., Natchitoches, for appellant.

Frank H. Peterman, J. Charles Burden, Jr., Alexandria, for appellee.

Richard B. Williams, Natchitoches, for intervenor.

*531HARDY, Judge.

This is a suit for damages brought by the plaintiff as the surviving widow of John Vascocu, who was killed in the railway crossing accident. This case was consolidated for trial and for the purposes of appeal with the cases of Rachal v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company, La.App., 61 So.2d 525 and Desadier v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company, La.App., 61 So.2d 530.

This case is distinguished from the noted companion cases by reason of the fact that counsel for plaintiff, with becoming candor and frankness, has admitted in this court that in any event this plaintiff -would be precluded from recovery by reason of the fact that decedent, who was the driver of the truck involved in the collision, was unquestionably demonstrated on trial of the case to have been guilty of contributory negligence.

For this reason and for the reasons assigned in our opinion in the Rachal case, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2004 ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 5, 2004                              /s/ Jimmy D. Wright
                                                    Jimmy D. Wright
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2065 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2065

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to expand the flexibility 
            of customized training, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2001

Mr. Radanovich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to expand the flexibility 
            of customized training, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Customized Training Flexibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FLEXIBILITY IN CUSTOMIZED TRAINING REQUIREMENT UNDER THE 
              WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT OF 1998.

    Section 101(8) of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 
2801(8)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(including a group 
        of employers)'' and inserting ``or a group of employers within 
        the same industry'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``the employer'' and 
        inserting ``any such employer''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``for not less than 50 
        percent'' and inserting ``a portion''.

SEC. 3. OTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT OF 1998.

    (a) Definition of Eligible Youth.--Section 101(13)(B) of the 
Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801(13)(B)) is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(B)(i) is a low-income individual; or
                    ``(ii) has been determined to meet the eligibility 
                requirements for free meals under the Richard B. 
                Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et 
                seq.) during the most recent school year; and''.
    (b) Use of Funds for Adult and Dislocated Worker Employment and 
Training Activities.--Section 134(d)(4) of the Workforce Investment Act 
of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2864(d)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                    ``(H) Coordination with unemployment 
                compensation.--An eligible adult or dislocated worker 
                participating in training (except for on-the-job 
                training) shall be deemed to be in training with the 
                approval of the State agency in the same manner as 
                provided under section 314(f)(2) of the Job Training 
                Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1661c(f)(2)) (as such 
                section was in effect on the day before the date of the 
                enactment of this Act).''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:08-cv-00251-MML Document 24 Filed 07/01/08 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:08-cv-00251-MML Document 24 Filed 07/01/08 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:08-cv-00251-MML Document 24 Filed 07/01/08 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.7








Exhibit 10.7

 

LAWRENCE E. STEINBERG

THREE LINCOLN CENTRE

5430 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1575

Dallas, Texas 75240-2641

_____


(972) 770-2256 - Facsimile (972) 770-2210


 

October 21, 2003







Mr. Steven B. Solomon

President

Citadel Security Software

8750 N. Central Expressway

Suite 100

Dallas, Texas 75231





	
Re:
	
Conversion of Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $200,000 dated July 16, 2003







Dear Steve:




I would like to convert the enclosed Promissory Note in the principal amount of $200,000 with interest due as of October 21, 2003 at 8% per annum of $4,252 into common stock of Citadel Security Software, Inc. pursuant to the Promissory Note (namely, "the number of shares to be issued on conversion shall be determined by dividing outstanding indebtedness under the Note by $1.00"). Accordingly, I should receive 204,252 shares of common stock of Citadel Security Software, Inc. Also, I would appreciate Citadel registering these shares along with the 80,000 shares that I previously purchased in connection with the loan.




Thank you.





	
 
	
Sincerely,

 

/s/ Lawrence E. Steinberg

Lawrence E. Steinberg










LES: mme

Enclosure
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Robert McCluske y

V.

PrimeCare Medical Inc . et al.

Civil No. 05-cv-52-JD

ORDE R

On April 25, 2006, the Court ordered the plaintiff to identify and serve defendants listed as

Jane and John Doe within 20 days of that order or the claims against those defendants would be

dismissed without prejudice .

To date, no identification has been filed nor has any extension of time to do so been sought .

It is, therefore, ordered that defendants Jane and John Doe are dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

May 22, 2006 /s/ Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:05-cv-00052-JD Document 46 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 1