alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker, as Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ Manuel  Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker* | * * |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker        |     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer              |     |
| November 9, 2009                              |     |

 

----
Order entered July 30, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00029-CR

JORGE LUIS ALEJANDRO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-58523-L

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
41

C.7. Local Trends in Farm Income and Expenditures as Reported by Banks in Each RegionPercent

Farm income Farm household spending Farm capital sp

Quarter Lower Same Higher Lower Same Higher Lower Same 

Ninth (Minneapolis) Federal Reserve District (MI*, MN, MT, ND, SD, WI*)

2007: Q4... 2 12 86 2 28 71 2 2

2008: Q1... 0 10 90 0 32 68 1 1 Q2... 6 17 77 6 27 67 6 2 Q3... 10 30 60 7 37 57 11 3 Q4... 46 23 31 26 46 27 35 32009: Q1... 58 27 15 37 42 21 54 2 Q2... 41 42 17 29 57 15 43 4 Q3... 58 34 8 38 53 9 54 3 Q4... 46 33 21 29 54 17 42 4

Tenth (Kansas City) Federal Reserve District (CO, KS, MO*, NE, NM*, OK, WY)

2007: Q4... 7 25 68 5 47 48 7 3

2008: Q1... 7 25 68 5 36 59 7 3 Q2... 8 35 57 8 40 51 12 4 Q3... 10 35 55 6 42 52 13 4 Q4... 36 36 29 31 45 24 42 32009: Q1... 48 38 14 46 42 13 57 3 Q2... 41 47 12 32 58 11 47 4 Q3... 56 38 5 45 45 10 57 3 Q4... 36 42 22 26 57 17 41 4

Twelfth (San Francisco) Federal Reserve District (AL, AZ, CA, HI, ID, NV, OR, UT, WA)

2007: Q4... 5 0 95 11 42 47 11 2

2008: Q1... 5 29 67 10 43 48 14 2 Q2... 10 19 71 19 29 52 14 3 Q3... 16 37 47 22 39 39 16 4 Q4... 50 17 33 61 22 17 72 22009: Q1... 71 29 0 59 35 6 75 1 Q2... 65 35 0 70 30 0 70 2 Q3... 84 16 0 68 32 0 68 3 Q4... 68 16 16 63 26 11 68 1 * State falls only partly within the indicated Reserve District. n.a. Not available. Source. Federal Reserve Bank quarterly surveys of agricultural credit conditions at commercial banks.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Mark
Goldwasser


Mark Goldwasser


Chief Executive Officer


February 17, 2009
18

A.13. Characteristics of Bank Loans to Farmers -- Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders, by Risk Rating, Percent except as notedLoan characteristic All Minimal Low Moderate Acceptable Special Not rated Volume of loans (thousands of dollars) 463,641 69,088 55,559 135,617 74,273 2,154 28,713 Number of loans 8,486 1,105 1,484 3,083 627 103 187 Weighted average maturity (months)1 28.22 13.22 22.34 49.39 28.64 9.65 15.51 

Weighted average repricing interval (months)2 7.24 9.43 10.66 9.41 7.06 12.55 12.39 

Weighted average risk rating3 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 n.a. n.a

Weighted average interest rate4 6.19 6.08 6.14 6.83 4.97 7.31 6.60 

 Standard error5 .09 .21 .28 .27 .32 1.81 .30 

 Interquartile range6 75th percentile 7.13 6.25 6.72 7.59 5.12 7.67 8.00  25th percentile 5.26 5.26 5.65 6.45 4.25 7.67 6.00  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 5.95 5.26 7.29 5.07 n.a. n.a. 5.47  Other livestock 10.06 7.17 n.a. 6.52 11.07 n.a. 6.94  Other current operating expenses7 5.81 6.17 6.62 4.66 6.94 6.61 6.11 

 Farm machinery and equipment 7.81 6.55 6.59 7.51 7.67 n.a. 6.70  Farm real estate 7.59 7.04 7.36 4.60 n.a. 6.17 6.73  Other8 6.51 n.a. 7.68 6.31 .00 n.a. 6.88 

Share of total loan volume Features of loan Floating rates 52.45 46.77 53.84 82.28 11.28 1.64 32.63  Under commitment 39.84 61.81 60.35 3.30 20.24 .90 23.74  Callable 7.84 24.95 39.62 3.16 n.a. 68.86 8.13  Purpose of loan Feeder livestock 15.14 21.70 .67 .12 n.a. n.a. 16.06  Other livestock 1.38 9.53 6.83 1.78 2.14 n.a. 1.80  Other current operating expenses7 68.32 58.35 64.23 59.86 16.15 98.36 56.52 

 Farm machinery and equipment 6.20 2.37 3.31 1.50 77.62 n.a. 10.73  Farm real estate .58 8.06 21.16 21.92 n.a. 1.64 13.35  Other8 8.39 n.a. 3.80 14.82 4.09 n.a. 1.55 

 Type of collateral Farm real estate 4.54 14.79 45.51 24.84 n.a. 59.92 18.73  Other 95.01 77.38 53.79 75.06 n.a. n.a. n.a Note. Most small and mid-sized farm lenders that reported loans to farmers had less than $25 million in farm loans. For explanation of footnotes, see table A.8. n.a. Not available.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 

v. Case No. 09-cr-01-01-SM

Jose Arroyo Castillo,

 Defendant

O R D E R

Defendant Castillo’s motion to continue the trial is granted (document no.

12). Trial has been rescheduled for the month of June 2009. Defendant 

Castillo shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not later than May 26, 2009. 

On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall be effective. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 15 Filed 05/14/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for June 5, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. 

Jury selection will take place on June 16, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. 

SO ORDERED.

_________________________

 Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

May 14, 2009

cc: Bruce E. Kenna, Esq.

Terry Ollila, AUSA

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:09-cr-00001-SM Document 15 Filed 05/14/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02207-LTB

LORRAINE S. CISNEROS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

SGT. MINJAREZ, 

CAPT. FLIER, 

C/M RUDE BACA,

LT. HIGH BANKS, and 

THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY PROGRAM,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK

This matter is before the Court on the motion titled “Motion to Amend A

Reconsideration” (ECF No. 10) that Plaintiff, Lorraine S. Cisneros filed with the Court on

November 17, 2011. The motion is denied for the reasons previously stated in the order

of November 3, 2011, denying Ms. Cisneros’ October 3, 2011, motion for

reconsideration. As the Court informed Ms. Cisneros in the November 3 order, because

the dismissal in the instant action was without prejudice, Plaintiff may initiate a new

action by properly completing the Court-approved forms available with the applicable

instructions, and with the assistance of her case manager or the facility’s legal assistant,

at www.cod.uscourts.gov.

Dated: November 18, 2011

 

Case 1:11-cv-02207-LTB Document 11 Filed 11/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Randolph L. Chambers

v. Civil No. 08-cv-442-JL

Richard Gerry, Warden,

New Hampshire State Prison

O R D E R

Randolph Chambers has filed an initial complaint (document

no. 1) as well as other pleadings and documents, ostensibly

presented in support of the claims stated in the complaint

(document nos. 16, 19, 20 & 22 - 24). While several of the

documents filed pertain to the complaint, as explained in my

Report and Recommendation issued simultaneously with this Order,

I find that two of the additional filings are unrelated to the

underlying action and should therefore be docketed as complaints

in separate actions. 

The Clerk’s Office is directed to open two new cases,

docketing Chambers’ motion for an injunction (document no. 16) as

the complaint in one of the cases, and Chambers’ motion for

subpoena (document no. 24) as the complaint in the other. The

Clerk’s Office may rely on Chambers’ submissions in the aboveCase 1:08-cv-00442-JL Document 27 Filed 03/12/09 Page 1 of 2
2

captioned case regarding in forma pauperis status, and my grant

of that status, in opening the new cases and assessing the

initial partial filing fee to be paid in each, if any. Upon

receipt of any required initial filing fee payment, the cases

will be referred to me for preliminary review.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: March 12, 2009

cc: Randolph L. Chambers, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00442-JL Document 27 Filed 03/12/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23





                         Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-83590) of Meridian National Corporation and in the related
prospectus, and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-72256 and 333-
961) pertaining to the 1990 Non-qualified and Incentive Stock Option Plan and to
the Amended and Restated 1987 Non-employee Directors' Stock Option Plan of
Meridian National Corporation of our report dated June 20, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Meridian National Corporation included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 28, 1997.



                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Toledo, Ohio
June 24, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Nancy Hudson Moll

v. Case No. 08-cv-234-SM

Robert J. Fink

ORDER

Re: Document No. 39, Pro Se Defendant’s Motion for

Postponement of Pre-Trial Conference

Ruling: Denied - notice was provided on August 26, 2008;

defendant was provided a courtesy reminder by the deputy clerk

recently. The court notes that defendant has not filed pretrial

materials as required by rule. Failure to appear as required risks

entry of default judgment.

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Date: September 3, 2009

cc: James H. Schulte, Esq. 

Paul McEachern, Esq. 

Robert Murphy, Jr., Esq.

Robert J. Fink, pro se

Case 1:08-cv-00234-SM Document 40 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Douglas N. Lund

v. Civil No. 08-cv-00231-JL

Segway, Inc.

O R D E R

The Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in chambers on

July 31, 2008.

The Discovery Plan (document no. 9) is approved as

submitted.

Counsel for both parties understand that the payment which

is the subject of the defendant’s motion to dismiss is

forthcoming. The court will act on the motion after the

expiration of the objection deadline under Local Rule 7.1(b). 

Should either party desire a hearing on the motion to dismiss,

counsel should request that the Deputy Clerk schedule one.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Dated: August 1, 2008

cc: Douglas E. Griffith, Esq.

Robert J. Meagher, Esq.

Andrew D. Dunn, Esq.

Case 1:08-cv-00231-JL Document 10 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 17, 2019 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust
2019-2 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution
and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.
in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from April 17, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated:  March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1936

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the oak tree as the

national tree of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2001

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. GOSS, and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the

oak tree as the national tree of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL TREE.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—Chapter 3 of title 36, United

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘§ 305. National tree

8 ‘‘The tree genus Quercus, commonly known as the

9 oak tree, is the national tree.’’.
2

•HR 1936 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 36 is

2 amended—

3 (1) in the table of contents for part A of sub4 title I, by striking ‘‘, and March’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘March, and Tree’’;

6 (2) in the chapter head for chapter 3, by strik7 ing ‘‘, AND MARCH’’ and inserting ‘‘MARCH,

8 AND TREE’’; and

9 (3) in the table of sections for chapter 3, by

10 adding at the end the following:

‘‘305. National tree.’’.

Æ
#### Ina Jean Bingham, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants.

[808 NYS2d 197]

*434Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about October 8, 2004, upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $2 million for past pain and suffering and $1.5 million for future pain and suffering, unanimously modified, on the facts, the awards for pain and suffering vacated, and the matter remanded for a new trial solely upon the issue of damages for past and future pain and suffering, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to reduction of the award for past pain and suffering to $1,000,000 and the award for future pain and suffering to $750,000, and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained when she fell down a stairway providing access to a subway station. The Court of Appeals reinstated the action (99 NY2d 355 [2003], *revg*287 AD2d 411 [2001]) upon the finding that there was a triable issue as to whether defendant Transit Authority was in fact merely a common user of the stairway. In so doing, the Court expressly refused to consider defendants’ belated contention, raised for the first time in that Court, that *Bethel v New York City Tr. Auth.*(92 NY2d 348 [1998]) rendered the common-use issue irrelevant and required the action’s dismissal (99 NY2d at 359). We reject the argument that *Bethel*dictates an abandonment of the rule set forth in *Schlessinger v Manhattan Ry. Co.*(49 Misc 504 [App Term 1906]). *Bethel*“realigned] the standard of care required of common carriers with the traditional, basic negligence standard of reasonable care under the circumstances” (92 NY2d at 351). It did not affect the *Schlessinger*rule, which imposes upon a railway company the duty to provide safe approaches for its passengers if those approaches are “constantly and notoriously used by passengers” for such purpose (49 Misc at 505).

Defendants, however, persuasively argue that a total award of $3.5 million for plaintiffs past and future pain and suffering is excessive and deviates from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances. Without minimizing plaintiff’s substantial wrist, ankle and leg injuries and their sequelae, the jury’s pain and suffering awards nonetheless exceeded what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated *(compare Uriondo v Timberline Camplands, Inc.,*19 AD3d 282 [2005]; *Baez v New York City Tr. Auth.,*15 AD3d 309 [2005]; *Lewis v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*8 AD3d 205 [2004]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and *435find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Malone, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02233-WYD-MJW

CBS OUTDOOR, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

800 LINCOLN LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Vacate Final Pretrial Conference

and Extend Deadline for Submitting Proposed Final Pretrial Order is GRANTED. The

Final Pretrial Conference set for August 20, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED. The

deadline for filing a proposed final pretrial order on August 15, 2012 is VACATED.

The court will reset the Final Pretrial Conference once there is a ruling on the

pending motions for summary judgment.

Date: August 10, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02233-WYD-MJW Document 48 Filed 08/10/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
H. R. 2099 

One Hundred Seventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two 

An Act 

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 

provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National Historic Reserve. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE. 

Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 110 Stat. 

4154) is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000,000’’ and all that follows 

through the period and inserting ‘‘$15,000,000 for development costs 

associated with capital projects consistent with the cooperative 

management plan, except that the Federal share of such development costs shall not exceed 50 percent of the total costs.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS