alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.2







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm



The Board of Directors

U.S. Bank National Association



We have examined management’s assertion,
included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association
(the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Regulation AB for the U.S. Bank Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the “Platform”), for which the Company provides
trustee, securities administration, registrar and paying agent services, as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, except for
servicing criteria Items 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(v), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the servicing platform covered by this
report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine
whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated
or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that
the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended October 31, 2021, for the U.S. Bank
Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/Ernst & Young LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota

December 21, 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket Nos. PH08-24-001; PH08-25-001] 

                    To afford additional time for further consideration of the matters at issue in the above-captioned proceeding, the 60-day period for action is hereby tolled. 18 CFR 366.4(b)(1), 366.4(c)(1). The temporary exemption or waiver provided by the regulations will remain in effect until such time as the Commission has determined whether to grant or deny the requested exemption or waiver.                     *Id.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-22614 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Freddie Williams, Appellant, v Seymour L. Halpern, M.D., Respondent.

[808 NYS2d 68]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered September 10, 2004, which denied defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment (1) on the issue of whether *468plaintiff contracted hepatitis C because of defendant’s medical malpractice, and (2) dismissing plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the claim for punitive damages arising from contraction of hepatitis C, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

We reject defendant’s contention that because plaintiff’s expert is a pathologist and not an internist or epidemiologist, he is unqualified to give an expert opinion with regard to how and when plaintiff contracted hepatitis C. The expert’s qualifications go to the weight rather than the admissibility of his testimony *(see Hill v New York Hosp.,*277 AD2d 117 [2000]). Similarly, any prior immoral acts or suspensions of his license bear on his credibility but do not preclude him from testifying as an expert *(cf. Spanier v New York City Tr. Auth., 222*AD2d 219 [1995]). The claim for punitive damages as to hepatitis B was properly sustained upon a record sufficient to permit a jury to find that defendant’s conduct demonstrated a gross indifference to patient care and a danger to the public *(cf. Graham v Columbia Presbyt. Med. Ctr.,*185 AD2d 753 [1992]); however, the record was insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to punitive damages as to hepatitis C. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1930 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1930

   To reauthorize the supplemental grant for population increases in 
certain states under the temporary assistance to needy families program 
                         for fiscal year 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2001

Mr. Brady of Texas (for himself, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Foley, Mrs. 
  Thurman, and Mr. Thompson of Mississippi) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reauthorize the supplemental grant for population increases in 
certain states under the temporary assistance to needy families program 
                         for fiscal year 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF TANF SUPPLEMENTAL GRANT FOR POPULATION 
              INCREASES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002.

    Section 403(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)) 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ``and 2001,'' and 
        inserting ``2001, and 2002,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(iii), by striking ``and 2001'' and 
        inserting ``2001, and 2002'';
            (3) in subparagraph (E)--
                    (A) by striking ``appropriated for'' and inserting 
                ``appropriated--
                            ``(i) for'';
                    (B) by striking the period and inserting ``; and''; 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) for fiscal year 2002, such sums as 
                        are necessary for grants under this 
                        paragraph.''; and
                    (D) in subparagraph (G), by striking ``2001'' and 
                inserting ``2002''.
                                 <all>
```
U .S. DISTRICT COURT D ;STZICT OF N .H.

2 0 FEB 1 0 P 3: 3 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

V .

Heather Heinemann

Criminal No . 08-cr-102-01-PB

O R D E R

Today, the defendant Heather Heinemann was before the court

on an initial appearance based on a motion notifying violations

of her conditions of supervised release . The defendant waived the

probable cause hearing . See Fed . R . Crim . P . 32 .1(b)(1)(A) . The

defendant tested positive in December 2008 and January 2009 fo r

juana, misled her probation officer regarding her

association with a convicted felon (who is the father of her

child and unborn child), and ignored the instructions of the

probation officer to associate with the felon . Earlier in 2008,

she was convicted of shoplifting and possession of marijuana and

failed to notify her probation officer . No action was taken at

that time . Based upon the waiver and information provided in the

report of the U .S . Probation Officer, I find probable cause to

hold defendant Heather Heinemann for a revocation hearing .

Defendant sought bail conditions under Fed . R . Crim . Proc .

32 .1(a)(6), Under Rule 32 .1(a)(6) defendant bears the burden of

establishing by clear and convincing evidence that she will not

Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 2 of 6
flee and that she poses no danger to any other person or to the

community . Despite the opportunities given to the defendant

through counseling, defendant continues to use marijuana . She is

a danger to the community, to her children and to her unborn

child . Notwithstanding the suggestions of the defense for an

alternative to detention, such as curfew and counseling (and

treatment for chronic depression), I find that there are no

conditions of release which will reasonably assure the safety of

the community .

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the defendant be detained

pending final revocation hearing .

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney

General or his designated representative for confinement in a

corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from

persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal . The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel . On

order of a court of the United States or on request of an

attorney for the government, the person in charge of the

corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the United

States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connectio n

2

Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 4 of 6
with a court proceeding .

SO ORDERED .

Date : February 10, 200 9

cc : Bjorn R . Lange ,

Mark Zuckerman ,

U .S . Marshal

U .S . Probation

Esq .

Esq .

u"o Arena s

U 'ted States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:08-cr-00102-PB Document 5 Filed 02/10/09 Page 6 of 6
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Summary Charts                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|PDF (11 KB)                                                           
|                                                                      
|
|                                                                      
|A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                          
|A.3. Volume of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                             
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans                   
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.5. Average Effective Interest Rate on Non-real-estate Bank          
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.6. Share of Non-real-estate Bank Loans with a Floating Interest Rate
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.7. Distribution of Dollar Amount of Non-real-estate Farm Loans      
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.8. All Banks, by Size of Loan                                       
|ASCII (7 KB)                                                          
|A.9. Large Farm Lenders, by Size of Loan                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.10. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.11. All Banks, by Risk Rating                                       
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                          
|A.12. Large Farm Lenders                                              
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.13. Small and Mid-sized Farm Lenders                                
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          
|A.14. Regional Disaggregation of Survey Results                       
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                          

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: August 25, 2005
25

B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Estimated volume Share of outstanding real estate farm loans

(millions of dollars) (percent)

Year Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1995...... 12 0 3 6 4 .055 -.001 .011 .027 .016

1996...... 7 0 1 2 4 .031 .000 .003 .009 .017

1997...... 16 -1 0 3 14 .064 -.003 -.001 .010 .054

1998...... 6 -1 3 0 5 .022 -.004 .009 .000 .016

1999...... 15 0 3 5 7 .051 -.001 .011 .015 .022

2000...... 12 -12 3 8 14 .037 -.037 .009 .022 .040

2001...... 42 10 9 5 17 .123 .030 .027 .014 .049

2002...... 35 8 6 5 16 .097 .022 .017 .014 .041

2003...... 32 4 6 8 14 .082 .010 .015 .021 .034

2004...... 18 1 5 2 10 .044 .003 .012 .005 .021

2005...... 17 2 11 4 0 .039 .005 .024 .009 .000

2006...... 20 2 6 1 12 .042 .003 .012 .002 .023

 Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

 n.a. Not available.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
2ND QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                              1,462
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      69,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                        2,107
<INVENTORY>                                       227,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  302,710
<PP&E>                                             84,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                     23,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    409,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             258,307
<BONDS>                                            33,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              132
<OTHER-SE>                                        108,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      409,462
<SALES>                                           357,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  357,753
<CGS>                                             293,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     293,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   47,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  7,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    10,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                        4,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 5,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        5,972
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.45



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-91-PB

Jonathan Chery

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

trial scheduled for March 3, 2009, citing the need for additional

time to finalize plea negotiations. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from March 3, 2009 to May 5, 2009. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:08-cr-00091-PB Document 39 Filed 02/13/09 Page 1 of 2
2

The February 25, 2009 final pretrial conference is continued

to April 21, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

February 13, 2009

cc: Scott F. Gleason, Esq.

Thomas J. Gleason, Esq.

Robert Veiga, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00091-PB Document 39 Filed 02/13/09 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55520-55521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22562]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1789-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1789-DR),

[[Page 55521]]

dated September 10, 2008, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 3, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-22562 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered
to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 17, 2019 (the “Agreement”) and Item
1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2019-2 (the “Trust”),
the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by
AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith. The capitalized terms
used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the
preceding period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under
the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       | Dated: March 4, 2022
|--- | --------------------------------------- | --------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |                     
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |                     
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Cong Duc Nguyen

Criminal No . 08-cr-152-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

12) filed by defendant is granted in part ; the continuance is

limited to 45 days .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/ Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : March 13, 200 9

cc : Michael Sheehan, Esq .

Jennifer Davis, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00152-JD Document 13 Filed 03/13/09 Page 1 of 1