alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-24145) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. Employees'
Savings and Stock Ownership Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
82800) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. 1987 Stock Option Plan and
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75025) pertaining to First Oak
Brook Bancshares, Inc. Amended and Restated 1987 Stock Option Plan of our report
dated January 20, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                            Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1999
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RODNEY TIMOTHY WEBB, ) DOC #S39427, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3420 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 15, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and BADALAMENTI and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<Page>


                                                                        Ex. 31.1


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    I, Andrew Benson, certify that:

    1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DataMEG Corp., for
the year ended December 31, 2003;

    2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

    4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: April 20, 2004.


/s/ Andrew Benson
---------------------
By:  Andrew Benson
President and Principal Financial Officer
Amendment to Agreement for Sale of Commercial Time



 Exhibit 10.95 
  
 AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF COMMERCIAL TIME 
  
 This Amendment dated as of January 1, 2004 by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc.
(“Mission”) is made to that certain Agreement for Sale of Commercial Time dated as of May 1, 1999 by and between Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc. and Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC (the “Agreement”). 
  
 WHEREAS, Mission, as successor to Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc., is
the licensee of television broadcast station KCIT, Amarillo, Texas and low power television station KCPN-LP, Amarillo, Texas; 
  
 WHEREAS, Nexstar, as successor to Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC, is the licensee of television broadcast station KAMR-TV, Amarillo, Texas;

  
 WHEREAS, Mission and Nexstar have assumed the Agreement for
their mutual benefit; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration
of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Nexstar has assumed all of Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC’s rights and obligations under the Agreement. 
  
 2. Mission has assumed all of Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc.’s rights and obligations under the Agreement. 
  
 3. Paragraph 3 and Schedule A of the Agreement are deleted in their entirety
and replaced with the following: “Payments. During the term of this Agreement, from the revenues that Nexstar collects pursuant to this Agreement, Nexstar will pay seventy (70) percent to Mission (the “Monthly Payment”). In
exchange for the services Nexstar provides under this Agreement, Nexstar will retain thirty (30) percent of the revenues it collects as its fee for such services. 
  
 4. These revised payment terms are effective as of the date hereof. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	 NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ G. Robert Thompson

	 	 	

	 Name:
	 	 G. Robert Thompson

	 Title:
	 	 CFO



  

			
	 MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ David S. Smith

	 	 	

	 Name:
	 	 David Smith

	 Title:
	 	 President
<Page>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

                         ------------------------------

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                       Percentage
                                                                       of Voting
                                                                       Securities
                                                       State of        Owned By
                                                     Incorporation     Registrant
                                                     -------------     ----------

<S>                                                     <C>                 <C>
    Compupower Corporation                              Delaware            100%

    Value Line Securities, Inc.                         New York            100%

    The Vanderbilt Advertising Agency, Inc.             New York            100%

    Value Line Publishing, Inc.                         New York            100%

    Value Line Distribution Center, Inc.                New Jersey          100%
</Table>







                                                                              42
Exhibit 4.4

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

         THIS FIRST  AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING  SERVICES  AGREEMENT,  dated May 6,
2004 (the  "Fifth  Amendment"),  is by and  between  Vintage  Filings,  LLC (the
"Consultant"), and NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

         A. The  Consultant  and the Client  entered into a Consulting  Services
Agreement  dated April 6, 2004, a copy of which is attached  hereto as Exhibit A
(the  "Agreement"),  pursuant to which the Consultant  agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

         B. Client and  Consultant  wish to amend  Section 2 of the Agreement to
provide for  additional  consideration  in exchange  for  additional  consulting
services.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the  foregoing,  and the mutual
agreements, representations,  warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other  good  and  valuable   consideration   the  receipt  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.  Section 2 of the  Agreement  shall be deleted in its  entirety and is hereby
amended to read as follows:

"2.      Consideration.

         Client agrees to pay Consultant,  as its fee and as  consideration  for
services provided,  6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Client, which shares
shall  be  registered  on Form  S-8.  Further,  the  6,000,000  shares  shall be
allocated  and issued as follows:  (1) 3,000,000  shares to Shai Stern,  and (2)
3,000,000  shares to Seth Farbman.  By amendment dated May 6, 2004 Client agrees
to pay Consultant an additional  1,800,000 shares of common stock of the Client,
which shares shall be registered  on Form S-8.  Further,  the  1,800,000  shares
shall be allocated and issued as follows:  (1) 900,000 shares to Shai Stern, and
(2) 900,000 shares to Seth Farbman."

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                            CLIENT:

                                            NANNACO, INC.


                                            By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Steve Careaga - CEO


                                            CONSULTANT:

                                            VINTAGE FILINGS, LLC


                                            By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name: Seth Farbman
                                            Title: Manager/member


                                            By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name: Shai Stern
                                            Title: Manager/member
**Exhibit 32**

 

 

ISONICS CORPORATION

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350of the

Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofIsonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 31,2008, each of the undersigned Christopher Toffales, the Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and George O’Leary, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge and belief:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 
| December 22, 2008 | /s/ Christopher Toffales                      |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                          |
|                   | Christopher Toffales, Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |                                          |
|                   |                                          |
| December 22, 2008 | /s/ George O’Leary                       |
|                   |                                          |
|                   | George O’Leary, Chief Financial Officer  |

 

----
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation

Act of 1998 through fiscal year 2004, and forother purposes.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998

through fiscal year 2004, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2131 EH

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR BENEFITS.

2 Section 805(a)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conserva3 tion Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431c(a)(2)) is amended by

4 striking ‘‘major’’.

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO SUPPORT

6 REDUCTION OF DEBT UNDER THE FOREIGN

7 ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961 AND TITLE I OF THE

8 AGRICULTURAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND

9 ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1954.

10 (a) REAUTHORIZATION.—Section 806 of the Tropical

11 Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d) is

12 amended by adding at the end the following new sub13 section:

14 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FIS15 CAL YEARS AFTER FISCAL YEAR 2001.—For the cost (as

16 defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform

17 Act of 1990) for the reduction of any debt pursuant to

18 this section or section 807, there are authorized to be ap19 propriated to the President the following:

20 ‘‘(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.

21 ‘‘(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

22 ‘‘(3) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.’’.

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

24 808(a)(1)(D) of the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of

25 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431f(a)(1)(D)) is amended by striking

26 ‘‘to appropriated under sections 806(a)(2) and 807(a)(2)’’
3

•HR 2131 EH

1 and inserting ‘‘to be appropriated under sections

2 806(a)(2), 807(a)(2), and 806(d)’’.

3 SEC. 3. CHAIRPERSON OF THE ENTERPRISE FOR THE

4 AMERICAS BOARD.

5 Section 811(b)(2) of the Tropical Forest Conserva6 tion Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431i(b)(2)) is amended by

7 striking ‘‘from among the representatives appointed under

8 section 610(b)(1)(A) of such Act or paragraph (1)(A) of

9 this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘and shall be the represent10 ative from the Department of State appointed under sec11 tion 610(b)(1)(A) of such Act’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1996565
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          450301
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   30758241
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         5336201
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           5310422
<LOANS>                                       75731221
<ALLOWANCE>                                     271165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               120332545
<DEPOSITS>                                    75542190
<SHORT-TERM>                                  10813016
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1402417
<LONG-TERM>                                    4546619
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    28002382
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               120332545
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4248753
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1988965
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 99179
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6336897
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2436900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2943065
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3393832
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    45000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              184613
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2633543
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1543843
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1543843
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    943488
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                      8178
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                226215
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               271165
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            271165
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Guardian Angel Credit Union

v. Case No. 08-cv-261-PB

MetaBank, et al.

O R D E R

The parties shall meet, confer, and attempt to resolve their

differences concerning the motion to compel (doc. no. 66). 

Defendant shall provide a privilege log to opposing counsel

identifying any responsive documents that are withheld based on a

claim of privilege. If the parties are not able to resolve all

disputed discovery issues, they shall, within fourteen days, file

a jointly prepared document that separately identifies each

disputed request, and, for each such request, specifies the

parties’ arguments with respect to the request. The clerk shall

set a hearing on the motion after the joint filing is made. The

parties are on notice that sanctions may be imposed on any party

or counsel that takes an unreasonable position with respect to

any disputed discovery issue.

Case 1:08-cv-00261-PB Document 75 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 2
SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

September 10, 2010

cc: Randall Cooper, Esq.

Christopher Meier, Esq.

Bruce Felmly, Esq.

Christine Cesare, Esq.

Rachel Barber Shwartz, Esq.

Cathryn Vaughn, Esq.

2

Case 1:08-cv-00261-PB Document 75 Filed 09/10/10 Page 2 of 2
#### ODOM v. UNIVERSAL LIFE INS. CO. OF MEMPHIS, TENN.

No. 14901.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 25, 1934.

*778Rudolph O. Vorbuseh, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Warren M. Simon, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

PER OURIAM.

In a motion suggesting the dismissal of this appeal, appellee calls our attention to the fact that four documents which were offered in evidence are not in the transcript of appeal.

It is charged that the absence of these documents results from the fact that counsel for appellant failed to file them with the clerk of the court, a qua, and from this it is asserted that the fault lies with appellant and is not chargeable to the clerk.

Though the documents were offered in evidence in the trial court, they were not, at that time, filed and, in fact, had not been filed at the time the motion to dismiss the appeal was submitted in this court. They are not now in the transcript. Counsel for appellant brought them into this court in person on the day of the argument, but made no formal attempt to supplement the transcript.

The case is a suit on a health insurance policy which is alleged to have lapsed because of nonpayment of premiums, and the question involved is whether or not a certain payment was made in time to reinstate the policy before the commencement of the illness. The documents are relied upon as showing the date of the payment and the date on which the payment was remitted by the agent to the company. Manifestly they are essential to a proper determination of the controverted question.

Counsel for mover, however, have overlooked the effect of Act No. 234 of 1932 under which in such a situation as confronts us here we are required to grant to appellant at least two additional days for the purpose of permitting him to supplement the transcript.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that appellant is granted to and including June 30’ 1934, within which to supplement the transcript in formal manner unless, during that time, the documents are filed in this court by consent of counsel for all parties.

It is further ordered that if the said documents Ibe not filed prior to July 1, 1934, the appeal be, on that date, dismissed.

Action on motion to dismiss suspended.

HIGGINS, J., takes no part.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00158-CV

ALVIE ROBINSON,

Appellant

v.

ALICIA SCOTT AND BRANDEN MULLENS,

Appellees

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25,737

ORDER

Alvie Robinson appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his civil appeal. After filing 

a timely motion for new trial, Robinson’s notice of appeal was due May 10, 2016. It was 

not filed until May 18, 2016. 

Robinson now requests an extension of time to file his notice of appeal. Rule 26.3 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that we may extend the time to file a 

notice of appeal if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the 

appellant files in the trial court a notice of appeal and files in the appellate court a motion 
Robinson v. Scott Page 2

complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b). TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Within 

15 days from May 10, Robinson filed both a notice of appeal in the trial court and a motion 

for extension of time which complied with Rule 10.5(b) in this Court. 

Accordingly, Robinson’s motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal is 

granted in part.1 The Notice of Appeal filed on May 18, 2016 is timely as of that date.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed June 2, 2016

 

1 Robinson requests a 15 day extension which is not necessary.