alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2099 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2099

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2001

  Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE.

    Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 110 Stat. 4154) is amended 
by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$25,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
The Board of Directors 
Peoples First Corporation: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-28301 on Form S-3 and No.  33-28304 on Form S-8 of Peoples First Corporation
of our report dated January 27, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Peoples First Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stock-
holders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 1996, which reports appears in the December 31, 1996 annual
report on Form 10-K of Peoples First Corporation. 


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP 

St. Louis, Missouri 
March 20, 1997 

































                                                                             71
#### William MAHER and Evelyn Maher, his wife, Appellants, v. Saul KLINE and Sadye Kline, his wife, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.

Sept. 24, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 18, 1954.

*697Robert C. Lane and Curtiss B. Hamilton, Miami, for appellants.

Warren, Klein, Lehrman, Shorenstein & Kline and Sibley & Davis, Miami Beach, for appellees.

MATHEWS, Justice.

This case involves the question of usury. The principal contention is that the sum of $1,500, which covered attorneys’ fees, a brokerage commission and other incidental expenses in connection with a loan of $20,-000, was excessive and that the charges made were concealed usurious interest.

There was another issue of a $2,000 bonus which is not involved in this particular question.'

After answer was filed, the Chancellor found that the $1,500 was applied to actual expenses of the loan; such as, abstracting, recording fees, intangible taxes, and the balance for attorneys’ fees and brokerage fees. The lenders received none of the $1,500.

The finding of the Chancellor as set forth in the final decree, that the $1,500 charged the borrowers constituted legitimate expenses of the loan, is presumed to be correct and the burden of showing the incorrectness of such decree was upon the appellants. They have failed to meet this burdem

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, Q. J., and TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
#### Eva Jamison, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority-Lincoln Houses, Respondent.

[809 NYS2d 14]

*502Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered October 27, 2004, denying the petition and dismissing this proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The challenged administrative determination, which denied petitioner’s application for “remaining family member” status on the ground that written permission had not been obtained for her occupancy in the apartment, is neither arbitrary nor capricious (see *Matter of McFarlane v New York City Hous. Auth.,*9 AD3d 289 [2004]; *Matter of Abdil v Martinez,*307 AD2d 238 [2003]). Petitioner does not qualify as a remaining family member because she did not enter the apartment lawfully. Respondent never gave the tenant of record written permission for petitioner to join his household, and petitioner admitted that no such permission was ever obtained from project management for her to reside in the subject apartment. The fact that no written permission was ever obtained was further corroborated by the tenant’s annual income affidavits for the years petitioner allegedly lived in the apartment, in which he listed no occupants of the apartment other than himself, and by the testimony of the Housing Assistant that prior to the tenant’s death, he had never requested that anyone join his household. Nor was there any reference to petitioner in the tenant’s file while he was alive. The record affords no basis for relieving petitioner of the written notice requirement, since she failed to establish that respondent knew or implicitly approved of her permanent residency in the apartment (see *McFarlane,*9 AD3d at 291).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BPZEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker*    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| January 17, 2006                 |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     Federal Maritime Commission.                 

*Time and Date:*                     September 24, 2008—10 a.m.                 

*Place:*                     800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC.                 

*Status:*                     A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.                 

*Matters To Be Considered:*

## Open Session 

                    (1) Docket No. 06-05—                    *Verucci Motorcycles, LLC*                     v.                     *Senator International;*

                    (2) Docket No. 06-11—R.O.                     *White & Company, Inc., Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc.*                     v.                     *Port of Miami Terminal Operating Company, LLC,*                     Continental Stevedoring & Terminals, Inc.,                     *et al*.                 

(3) Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) Report to OMB; 

(4) FY2008 Budget Status Report, End-of-Year Possible Additional Funding Approvals. 

## Closed Session 

                    (1) Docket No. 1883(F)—                    *Frank J. Kuzela*                     v.                     *Maersk Sealand;*

(2) LA/Long Beach Ports/Terminals Agreements; 

(3) Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters. 

*For More Information Contact:*                     Karen V. Gregory, Assistant Secretary, (202) 523-5725.                 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-22139 Filed 9-18-08; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States

V.

Matthew Slater

Case No. 07-cr- 1 42-0 1 -SM

ORDE R

The judgment is hereby amended to include the following recommendation to the U .S.

Bureau of Prisons: that the defendant be considered for placement at FMC Devens in Ayer,

Massachusetts to serve his incarcerative sentence.

SO ORDERED.

January 28, 2008

cc: Jeffrey Levin, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

US Marshal

US Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00142-SM Document 22 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.2


 


AGREEMENT


 


For good and
valuable consideration, the LIVE RACING AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) effective
March 23, 1999 through January 1, 2004 by and among PENN NATIONAL TURF CLUB,
INC., MOUNTAINVIEW THOROUGHBRED RACING ASSOCIATION, the PENNSYLVANIA HORSEMEN’S
BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INC., and all of its terms and
conditions are hereby extended by the mutual consent of all parties through
11:59 p.m. on 5/31/04.


 


To indicate
their acceptance of this extension of the Agreement, the duly authorized agents
of the parties have executed below.


 


	
  PENNSYLVANIA
  NATIONAL TURF

  CLUB, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
      /s/
  Richard T. Schnaars

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
    Richard
  T. Schnaars

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
      Vice
  Pres./Gen. Mgr.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated:

  	
    3/30/04

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  MOUNTAINVIEW
  THOROUGHBRED

  RACING ASSOCIATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
      /s/
  Richard T. Schnaars

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
    Richard
  T. Schnaars

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
      Vice
  Pres./Gen. Mgr.

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated:

  	
    3/30/04

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  PENNSYLVANIA
  HORSEMEN’S

  BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE

  ASSOCIATION, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By: 

  	
      /s/
  John J. Wanes

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
    John
  J. Wanes

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
      President

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated:

  	
    3/30/04
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Hegdal, Appellant.

[745 NYS2d 489]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 22, 1999 *(People v Hegdal,*266 AD2d 472), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County, rendered April 25, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.4.1



 EXHIBIT 10.4.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is made this 29th day of March 2004, by Highland Hospitality, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership (the “Company”), and Highland Hospitality Corporation, a Maryland Corporation (the “REIT”), each with its principal place of business at 8405 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500, McLean, VA 22102 and Tracy M.J.
Colden, residing at 1501 Van Buren Street, N.W., Washington, District of Columbia 20012 (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the REIT entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated October 24, 2003 (the “Employment Agreement”) with
the Executive; 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to
amend the Employment Agreement to reflect the fact that the REIT is the employing entity regularly paying the compensation to the Executive and the employing entity with primary responsibility for taking action with respect to Executive’s
employment under the Employment Agreement; and 
  
 WHEREAS,
the parties desire to correct a reference in Section 6(d)(vii)(C) of the Employment Agreement. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 
  
 1. References in Sections 1, 4, 5 and 6 of the Employment Agreement to actions required or permitted to be taken by the “Company” shall be
required or permitted to be taken by the “Company Group”. 
  
 2. The word “Company” in Section 6(d)(vii)(C) shall be replaced with the word “REIT”. 
  
 3. Section 11(d) is amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(d) Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument executed by both the REIT and the Executive, which
amendment or modification is consented to by the Company.” 
  
 4. Section 11(g) is amended to read as follows: 
  
 “(g) Waiver. No delays or omission by the Company, the REIT or the Executive in exercising any right under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver of that or any other right. A waiver or consent by the REIT shall not be
effective unless consented to by the Company. A waiver or consent given by the Company Group or the Executive on any one occasion shall be effective only in that instance and shall not be construed as a bar or waiver of any right on any other
occasion.” 
  

 -1- 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of
the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	 HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY, L.P.

		
	By:	 	 HHC GP Corporation, its general
 partner

		
	By:	 	 /s/    James L. Francis

	 	 	

	 	 	 James L. Francis
 President and Chief Executive
Officer

	
	 TRACY M.J. COLDEN

	
	 /s/    Tracy M.J. Colden

	

	
	 HIGHLAND HOSPITALITY CORPORATION

		
	By:	 	 /s/    James L. Francis

	 	 	

	 	 	 James L. Francis
 President and Chief Executive
Officer



  

 -2-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2130 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2130

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that any water 
and sewerage disposal property conveyed under the Department of Defense 
privatization program shall be treated as a nontaxable contribution to 
                     the capital of the recipient.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2001

 Mr. Sam Johnson  of Texas (for himself and Mr. Matsui) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that any water 
and sewerage disposal property conveyed under the Department of Defense 
privatization program shall be treated as a nontaxable contribution to 
                     the capital of the recipient.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WATER AND SEWERAGE DISPOSAL PROPERTY CONVEYED UNDER MILITARY 
              PRIVATIZATION PROGRAM TREATED AS CONTRIBUTIONS TO 
              CAPITAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 118 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to contributions to the capital of a corporation) is amended 
by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f) and by inserting 
after subsection (d) the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Special Rule for Water and Sewerage Disposal Property 
Conveyed Under Military Privatization Program.--For purposes of this 
section, the term `contribution to the capital of the taxpayer' 
includes any property--
            ``(1) which provides water or sewerage disposal services, 
        and
            ``(2) which is received by any entity under section 2688 of 
        title 10, United States Code.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property conveyed after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 125




---



##### 



Exhibit 21.1 First Charter Corporation Affiliated Companies
As of March 11, 2005 Listed below are the subsidiaries of the Company, all of which are wholly owned and are owned
directly by the Company, unless otherwise indicated. Subsidiary
    
    State of IncorporationFirst Charter Bank
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Brokerage Services, Inc. (1)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Insurance Services, Inc. (1)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. (2)
    
    North CarolinaFirst Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. (3)
    
    VirginiaFirst Charter Realty Investments, Inc. (4)
    
    DelawareFirst Charter Real Estate Holdings, LLC (5)
    
    North CarolinaFCB Real Estate, Inc. (5)
    
    North CarolinaLincoln Center at Mallard Creek, LLC (6)
    
    North Carolina
   (1)
    
    Owned by First Charter Bank(2)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Bank(3)
    
    Owned by First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc.(4)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc.(5)
    
    Primarily owned by First Charter Realty Investments, Inc.(6)
    
    51 percent owned by First Charter Bank 126
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 09-cr-79-01-SM

Salvador Williams

Re: Document No. 61, Motion to Appoint Counsel for Appeal

Ruling: Denied. Defendant must request the United States Court of

Appeals for the First Circuit to appoint counsel pursuant to the rules

of that court, which provide, in relevant part:

 Rule 46.5 (b) Appointment of Counsel. The court may appoint counsel

who represented the person in the district court, or counsel from a panel

maintained by the court, or otherwise. The addition or deletion of names

from the panel and the selection of counsel shall be the sole and

exclusive responsibility of the court but the actual administration

thereof may be conducted by the clerk of this court. The person may ask

for appointment of counsel who represented the defendant in the district

court or for the nonappointment of such counsel, but shall not otherwise

request any specific individual. The court shall give consideration to

such request, but shall not be bound by it. A request for relief by trial

counsel, upon a showing of cause, shall be given due consideration. It

is recognized that counsel on appeal may require different qualifications

than for trial. The substitution of counsel on appeal shall not in any

way reflect upon the ability or upon the conduct of prior counsel. The

Administration Office shall be notified promptly of each appointment, and

of each order releasing counsel. 

Case 1:09-cr-00039-SM Document 67 Filed 01/11/10 Page 1 of 2
As a convenience only, the Clerk shall forward defendant's motion

to the Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

_______________________________

Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe

Date: January 11, 2010

cc: Counsel of Record

 Salvador Williams

Case 1:09-cr-00039-SM Document 67 Filed 01/11/10 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7580

ROBERT LAWRENCE TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1189) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lawrence Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Robert Lawrence Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Director, Virginia Dep’t of Corrections , No. CA-00-1189 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2000). We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-011-PB

Rob Thompson

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

May 6, 2008 trial in the above case to allow additional time to

resolve his state court case, scheduled for trial on June 16,

2008, prior to the trial in this matter. The government does not

object to a continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reason and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from May 6, 2008 to August 19, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial

Case 1:08-cr-00011-SM Document 10 Filed 04/22/08 Page 1 of 2
2

The April 28, 2008 final pretrial conference is continued to

July 30, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

April 21, 2008

cc: Tony Soltani, Esq.

Helen Fitzgibbon, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00011-SM Document 10 Filed 04/22/08 Page 2 of 2