alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1963 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1963

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route taken by 
   American soldier and frontiersman George Rogers Clark and his men 
during the Revolutionary War to capture the British forts at Kaskaskia 
and Cahokia, Illinois, and Vincennes, Indiana, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2001

 Mr. Costello introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the route taken by 
   American soldier and frontiersman George Rogers Clark and his men 
during the Revolutionary War to capture the British forts at Kaskaskia 
and Cahokia, Illinois, and Vincennes, Indiana, for study for potential 
                addition to the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GEORGE ROGERS CLARK NORTHWEST CAMPAIGN TRAIL 
              FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDITION TO THE NATIONAL TRAILS 
              SYSTEM.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(41) George Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail.--The George 
Rogers Clark Northwest Campaign Trail, tracing the water route and 
overland route of the 1778 and 1779 expedition of Lieutenant Colonel 
George Rogers Clark and his Virginia militia against the British in 
which he captured the British forts at Kaskaskia and Cahokia, in what 
is now Illinois, and twice captured Vincennes, in what is now 
Indiana.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

﻿

﻿

The Board of Directors 

Murphy Oil Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-226494) on Form S-8 and in the registration statement (No. 333-227875) on Form S-3 of Murphy Oil Corporation of our reports dated February 27, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Murphy Oil Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement Schedule II  (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, which reports appear in the December 31, 2018 annual report on Form 10‐K of Murphy Oil Corporation.

Our report dated February 27, 2019, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company acquired assets in MP Gulf of Mexico, LLC (the Acquired Business) during 2018, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, the Acquired Business’ internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $1.6 billion and total revenues of $56 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Acquired Business.

﻿

﻿

/s/ KPMG LLP

﻿

Houston, TexasFebruary 27, 2019

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

﻿

----
5

A.1. Number of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMillions

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period Total livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid1995...... 2.49 .26 .19 1.48 .17 .39 1.45 .57 .36 .12 1996...... 2.22 .18 .17 1.38 .14 .36 1.33 .48 .31 .11 1997...... 2.27 .19 .20 1.40 .15 .33 1.32 .50 .34 .11 1998...... 2.10 .15 .18 1.39 .17 .22 1.20 .45 .33 .12 1999...... 1.96 .14 .16 1.32 .16 .18 1.09 .44 .32 .11 2000...... 1.91 .11 .17 1.30 .13 .19 1.09 .44 .28 .10 2001...... 1.76 .13 .16 1.08 .13 .26 .97 .40 .28 .11 2002...... 1.95 .11 .15 1.34 .12 .23 1.11 .42 .31 .12 2003...... 1.66 .12 .12 1.14 .13 .15 .91 .36 .29 .10 2004...... 1.64 .09 .13 1.15 .13 .14 .87 .36 .29 .12 2005...... 1.47 .10 .11 1.02 .11 .14 .76 .32 .27 .12 2006...... 1.37 .11 .11 .92 .11 .11 .57 .36 .30 .13 2003: Q4... 1.57 .14 .14 1.04 .10 .15 .80 .36 .31 .10 2004: Q1... 1.60 .09 .13 1.12 .12 .15 .81 .33 .32 .14  Q2... 1.88 .08 .13 1.38 .14 .15 1.06 .43 .28 .10  Q3... 1.62 .07 .12 1.17 .14 .12 .93 .36 .23 .10  Q4... 1.44 .12 .13 .95 .10 .15 .67 .33 .32 .13 2005: Q1... 1.37 .10 .12 .94 .07 .14 .68 .29 .28 .12  Q2... 1.79 .11 .10 1.26 .14 .18 .97 .40 .28 .15  Q3... 1.52 .05 .09 1.10 .14 .14 .83 .33 .27 .10  Q4... 1.19 .12 .13 .77 .07 .09 .57 .27 .24 .11 2006: Q1... 1.53 .12 .13 1.06 .11 .11 .76 .31 .30 .16  Q2... 1.56 .10 .12 1.08 .13 .13 .62 .45 .34 .15  Q3... 1.23 .11 .08 .82 .10 .12 .48 .37 .27 .11  Q4... 1.13 .12 .10 .73 .08 .09 .42 .31 .29 .12 2007: Q1... 1.19 .08 .10 .79 .11 .12 .42 .32 .29 .17  Q2... 1.56 .08 .12 1.09 .13 .14 .63 .45 .35 .13  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedentiaL

muiteb ~tate~ qrourt of §ppeaI~

for tbe jfeberaI ({ireuit

NATIONAL PASTEURIZED EGGS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

L. JOHN DAVIDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1386

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

District of New Hampshire in case no. 07-CV-OI03, Chief

Judge Joseph N. Laplante.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, LINN, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge

ORDER

L. John Davidson moves without opposition for the

court to transfer this case to the United States Court of

Appeals for the First Circuit.

Case 1:07-cv-00103-JL Document 169 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 2 Case: 12-1386 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 01/03/2013
NATIONAL PASTEURIZED EGGS V. L. JOHN DAVIDSON 2

Davidson filed a notice of appeal in the United States

District Court for the District of New Hampshire, requesting review by the First Circuit of an order that denied a

motion to alter the district court's judgment. However,

perhaps because the underlying case involves patents, the

district court clerk's office transmitted the notice of appeal

to this court. Fed. R. App. P. 3(d)(1) states that the clerk of

the district court "must promptly send a copy of the notice

of appeal and of the docket entries .,. to the clerk of the

court of appeals named in the notice."

Because of the mandatory language of Rule 3(d)(1), we

believe we must transfer this appeal to the First Circuit,

i.e., the clerk of the district court was required to send the

notice of appeal to that court. Although we do not address

jurisdiction, the case appears to involve ownership of patents rights and contract interpretation. See Luckett v.

Delpark, Inc., 270 U.S. 496, 46 S.Ct. 397, 70 L.Ed. 703

(1926).

Accordingly,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The case is transferred to

the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

(2) All other motions are denied as moot.

FOR THE COURT

lsI Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s26

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: --JAN 0 3 2013

Case 1:07-cv-00103-JL Document 169 Filed 01/04/13 Page 2 of 2 Case: 12-1386 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 01/03/2013
Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 1 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 2 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 3 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 4 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 5 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 6 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 7 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 8 of 9

Case 1:08-cv-00096-PB   Document 5-2   Filed 03/31/08   Page 9 of 9
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the issuance and availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 120-16E, “Air Carrier Maintenance Programs”. This advisory circular (AC) is an update of AC 120-16D that was issued in 2003. It describes the scope, content, and functions of air carrier aircraft maintenance programs. It explains the background of these programs as well as the Federal Aviation Administration's regulatory requirements. Each of the 10 elements of air carrier maintenance programs is also described and explained. The material in this AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. However, when “must” or “will” are used in this AC, such use reflects actual regulatory requirements. 

# DATES:

Advisory Circular 120-16E, Air Carrier Maintenance Programs was issued by the Office of the Director, Flight Standards Service, AFS-1 on September 11, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Russell S. Unangst, Jr., Technical Advisor, Airworthiness, AFS-305, Federal Aviation Administration, Aircraft Maintenance Division, Flight Standards Service, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3786; facsimile (202) 267-5115, e-mail                         *russell.unangst@faa.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How to obtain a copy of this AC.

*How To Obtain Copies:*                     This AC can be read or downloaded from the Internet at                     *http://rgl.faa.gov/​*                     under the “Advisory Circular” hyperlink. Paper copies of this AC will be available in approximately 6-8 weeks from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341Q 75th Avenue, Landover, MD 20785.                 

Issued in Washington, DC, on September 17, 2008. 

Carol E. Giles, 

Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, Flight Standards Service.

[FR Doc. E8-22630 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
8

A.4. Average Maturity of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersMonths

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sma

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid-

1996...... 8.5 7.8 11.3 7.6 29.4 9.2 8.6 10.5 12.1 7.3 1997...... 9.9 9.1 11.0 10.7 30.6 7.4 8.8 11.6 12.4 8.8 1998...... 9.8 8.0 10.3 9.9 27.5 6.8 8.8 11.3 12.5 8.7 1999...... 11.5 8.0 11.0 11.3 20.1 10.5 9.8 11.2 12.4 11.4 2000...... 11.2 8.0 10.8 9.5 22.4 13.2 9.7 11.5 11.1 11.4 2001...... 13.2 8.5 14.0 10.3 24.3 15.3 9.6 11.9 12.5 14.1 2002...... 11.2 8.6 11.5 10.2 23.3 11.7 9.4 10.9 12.5 10.8 2003...... 12.5 8.5 9.4 11.1 26.5 14.4 9.5 11.2 12.7 12.9 2004...... 11.9 9.2 11.9 10.0 23.3 12.0 9.6 11.8 12.9 11.7 2005...... 12.9 9.4 10.0 9.9 18.9 18.3 9.3 11.4 13.5 13.1 2006...... 12.7 8.7 12.9 10.0 15.9 18.3 9.6 11.7 12.6 13.1 2007...... 13.3 9.9 15.1 9.7 21.4 18.5 9.8 11.8 11.6 14.3 2004: Q2... 10.4 8.6 10.5 10.3 18.4 9.2 10.8 11.9 12.2 9.5  Q3... 10.4 7.1 10.6 8.8 27.2 7.0 9.6 12.9 11.7 9.8  Q4... 11.9 10.2 13.2 8.5 17.8 16.9 7.7 9.3 11.1 12.6 2005: Q1... 13.3 10.8 9.9 11.1 46.8 16.5 8.7 12.1 15.2 13.0  Q2... 13.2 9.5 10.5 10.5 14.7 17.4 10.8 12.3 12.6 13.6  Q3... 10.8 8.8 10.0 9.0 13.6 12.8 8.1 11.0 12.7 10.4  Q4... 14.4 8.9 9.8 8.2 28.1 32.4 9.3 9.8 13.4 15.7 2006: Q1... 13.2 7.6 21.2 10.8 21.8 17.0 10.4 13.4 14.0 13.2  Q2... 11.6 8.2 10.1 10.4 12.1 15.0 11.0 12.1 13.2 11.1  Q3... 13.9 9.4 9.3 9.3 24.6 20.2 8.5 11.2 11.3 15.3  Q4... 12.5 9.0 11.4 9.0 14.3 20.6 7.9 9.9 11.4 13.4 2007: Q1... 13.5 10.3 16.5 10.8 33.0 16.3 9.6 14.2 12.5 13.8  Q2... 12.8 10.3 9.8 10.6 21.6 16.5 10.4 12.2 11.3 13.8  Q3... 13.9 6.8 23.9 8.1 20.5 18.3 10.5 10.7 10.1 16.2  Q4... 13.1 10.6 11.6 8.6 15.0 21.7 8.3 10.0 12.4 14.0  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates annual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COREY MICHAEL SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2409

[May 2, 2024]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Nicole P. Menz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312023MM001216A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Summer Hill, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 56615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated May 15, 2008 and published in the Federal Register 
on May 27, 2008 (73 FR 30418), Siegfried (USA), Inc., Industrial Park 
Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by letter to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Oripavine (9330), a basic class of controlled substance 
listed in schedule II.
    The company will use the above listed controlled substance in the 
manufacture of other controlled substance intermediates for sale to its 
customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Siegfried (USA), Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Siegfried (USA), Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

     Dated: September 22, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22879 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
January 26, 2004



Exhibit 10.2

IBM Credit LLC


January 26, 2004


 

Mr. Mark Hirschhorn

Datatec Industries, Inc. 

23 Madison Road

Fairfield, NJ  07004


Dear Mr. Hirschhorn:


We are here to inform you that your current credit line of $25,000,000.00 has been temporarily increased to $26,000,000.00 based upon recent advance requests needed to fund payroll and other company expenses presented in excess of the $25,000,000.00 credit line.  This temporary increase is effective for the period beginning January 23, 2004 and ending February 29, 2004.  On March 1, 2004 your credit line will be reduced back to $25,000,000.00.



All financing provided to you by IBM Credit LLC under this temporary portion of the credit line and the base portion of the credit line are subject to the terms and conditions of the Inventory and Working Capital Financing Agreement (as amended from time to time) executed on November 10, 2000 and any other agreements executed by Datatec Industries, Inc. and IBM Credit LLC.



If you have any questions regarding this information, please call Bruce Gordon at (914) 765-6232 or Amy Baker at (800) 678-6900 ext. 7990.


	
Sincerely,
	
Acknowledged and Agreed to:

	 	 
	
/s/ Kimberly Ramirez
	
/s/ Mark Hirschhorn

	
Kimberly Ramirez
	
Mark Hirschhorn

	
Loan Manager
	
CFO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Resource Management Company

v. Civil No. 06-cv-366-JD

Frank Gregory

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The parties in this matter appeared before me today on

plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and petition to

attach (document no. 23). Defendant objects (document no. 27). 

After hearing evidence and argument, I recommend that the motion

be denied. 

As I explained to the plaintiff during the hearing, I cannot

attach property that lies outside of the District of New

Hampshire. The defendant has agreed to transfer the funds that

are currently in Mr. Gregory’s personal trust account into an

escrow account held by defendant’s counsel’s office forthwith. 

Defendant has further agreed to deposit any further money that

would have been deposited into the defendant’s private trust

account into the newly created escrow account. As a result of

defendant’s willingness to safeguard these deposits as described,

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 40 Filed 02/27/07 Page 1 of 3
1I apply the reasoning previously applied in my

recommendation on plaintiff’s first motion for a preliminary

injunction to this matter to reach the same result. See Document

19.

2

as well as the plaintiff’s current inability, given incomplete

discovery, to demonstrate what specific funds should be the

subject of an injunction, I find that plaintiff cannot make the

necessary showing, today, of the need for a preliminary

injunction.1 If, however, after receiving the discovery ordered

today by separate Order, plaintiff believes that a preliminary

injunction seeking the deposit of any or all of the legal fees

Gregory receives from the Fen-Phen litigation is necessary and

authorized, he may renew his motion for a preliminary injunction

at that time. Such a renewed request should be limited to the

issue of the disposition of prospective legal fees expected to be

paid to Gregory.

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be

filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to

file objections within the specified time waives the right to

appeal the district court’s order. See Unauthorized Practice of

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 40 Filed 02/27/07 Page 2 of 3
3

Law Comm. v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);

United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986). 

_________________________________

James R. Muirhead

United States Magistrate Judge

Date: February 27, 2007

cc: Benjamin C. Riggs, Jr., pro se

Michael D. Ramsdell, Esq.

Mark E. Howard, Esq.

Case 1:06-cv-00366-JD Document 40 Filed 02/27/07 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westside Energy Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 7, 2005            /s/ Jimmy D. Wright
                                 -------------------
                                 Jimmy D. Wright
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.9

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO

                                VERSATILITY INC.

                       1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

         This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to Versatility Inc. 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is dated and made effective as of May
22, 1997. The Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of Versatility Inc.
(the "Company") on September 30, 1996, and was approved by the stockholders of
the Company (the "Stockholders") on September 30, 1996.

         Article 15 of the Plan permits the Board of Directors, from time to
time, to adopt certain amendments to the Plan without approval of the
Stockholders. On May 22, 1997, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution to
amend the Plan to decrease the minimum length of employment requirement to be
eligible to participate in the Plan form one year to six months.

         In accordance with the Board of Directors' action, the Plan is hereby
amended as set forth in this Amendment.

         1.        Article 3 is hereby amended by deleting the words "one year"
              in the third line thereof after the word "completed and before the
              words "of employment and substituting the words "six months"
              therefor.

         2.        Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment
              shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

         3.        Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Plan
              shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its
              original terms and conditions.

This Amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors on May 22, 1997.