alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Date: June 5, 2012

Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes FTR – Courtroom A501

DWAYNE A. JONES, Pro Se (by telephone)

Plaintiff,

vs.

ERWIN MOZER, M.D., Terry Cipoletti

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING 

Court in session: 11:12 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of pro se Plaintiff by telephone and counsel for Defendant.

Argument and discussion regarding Defendant Erwin Mozer, M.D.’s Motion to Compel

Plaintiff’s Discovery Responses (Doc. #52, filed 4/6/2012).

ORDERED: 1. Defendant Erwin Mozer, M.D.’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Discovery

Responses (Doc. #52, filed 4/6/2012) is GRANTED as stated on the

record. Plaintiff shall submit responses to Defendant’s discovery requests

by June 11, 2012. 

2. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for June 6, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. 

Plaintiff shall appear by telephone at that time. The Court will call the

facility at the time of the conference, due to the fact that Plaintiff is in an

infirmary (719-269-4078). 

3. An additional Telephonic Status Conference is set for June 19, 2012, at

10:30 a.m. Plaintiff shall appear by telephone at that time. Plaintiff

and his case manager, or a representative of the facility, shall contact the

Court at (303) 844-4507 on the above date and time in order to participate.

Discussion regarding Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel. The Court directs Plaintiff to

file a motion requesting volunteer counsel.

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 67 Filed 06/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Court in recess: 11:31 a.m. (Hearing concluded)

Total time in court: 0:19

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 67 Filed 06/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                     9,802
<SECURITIES>                               1,500
<RECEIVABLES>                             30,846
<ALLOWANCES>                               1,184
<INVENTORY>                                9,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          51,302
<PP&E>                                     9,859
<DEPRECIATION>                             3,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            63,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     25,593
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      81
<OTHER-SE>                                37,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              63,639
<SALES>                                   57,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          57,499
<CGS>                                     49,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             49,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           7,185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              941
<INCOME-TAX>                                 373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          568
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .07
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:08-cv-00117-WES   Document 5   Filed 04/16/08   Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 5, 2022 No. 04-22-00310-CR Julio C. RIVERON , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR2932 Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on August 25, 2022, and after we granted two motions for extension of time, the deadline was extended to October 11, 2022. However, to date, the brief has not been filed. This court notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency on October 13, 2022. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(2). We have received no response. Pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we abate this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions: (1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal? (2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel. (3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing. The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order the appellant’s counsel to be present at the hearing.The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records in

this court, no later than December 20, 2022 , which shall include: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions. All appellate filing dates are ABATED pending further orders from this court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-104835, 333-104458, 333-88382, 333-35318, 333-35208, 333-86113, 333-09721, 333-01649, 333-01651 and 033-60259 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 2, 2005 relating to the financial statements of West Coast Bancorp and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of West Coast Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2004.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon March 2, 2005
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 4Federal Reserve Bank of: ClevelandFilings received during the week ending October 23, 2010FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodNONE
---

All files contain data as of the current quarter. Files in comma-separated variable 
(CSV) format contain all available historical data.

|Section B
Selected Statistics from the Quarterly Reports of Condition of Commercial Banks   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|
|B.1. Farm Debt Outstanding at Commercial Banks                                              
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.2. Delinquent Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                 
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks         
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks                     
|ASCII (5 KB)                                                                                
|B.5. Net Charge-offs of Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks             
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            
|
|B.6. Distribution of Agricultural Banks by Share of Their Total Loans that are Nonperforming
|ASCII (4 KB)                                                                                
|B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks       
|ASCII (6 KB)                                                                                
|B.8. Average Loan-Deposit Ratios at Agricultural Banks in Selected Federal Reserve Districts
|ASCII (10 KB)                                                                               
|B.9. Number of Agricultural Bank Failures                                                   
|ASCII (2 KB)                                                                                
|                                                                                            

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: June 22, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02257-MJW

JAMES F. BLUM,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

TOM CLEMENTS, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Colorado Department

of Corrections;

TRAVIS TRANI, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Colorado

Department of Corrections;

ANTHONY A. DeCESARO, grievance officer, Colorado Department of Corrections,

individually and in his official capacity;

LEE ROMANSKI, a member of the sex offender treatment team at Arrowhead

Correctional Facility, individually and in her official capacity;

DANIEL CLAUS, individually and in his official capacity;

S. MICHAEL DUNLAP, individually and in his official capacity;

BURL McCULLAR, individually and in his official capacity;

MARGARET HEIL, individually and in her official capacity;

DAVID TESSIER, individually and in his official capacity;

J.D. SCOLLARD, individually and in his official capacity;

CHRISTINE TYLER, individually and in her official capacity;

DANA KRAKOW, individually and in her official capacity;

BONNIE CANTU, individually and in her official capacity;

CHRISTINA MARQUEZ, individually and in her official capacity;

JENNIFER MARTINEZ, individually and in her official capacity;

LEONARD WOODSON, individually and in his official capacity; and

BRIAN KOCH, individually and in his official capacity,

Defendant(s).

MINUTE ORDER 

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Stay Dispositive

Motions Deadline (docket no. 79 ) is GRANTED finding good cause shown and finding

no objection by Plaintiff. The March 16, 2012, deadline to file dispositive motions is

VACATED. This court will first rule on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Third

Amended Complaint] (docket no. 75) and then reset a dispositive motions deadline if

necessary. 

Date: March 14, 2012

Case 1:11-cv-02257-MJW Document 80 Filed 03/14/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 15, 2011 | /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III                 |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | J. Bryant Kirkland III                     |   |
|                 | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02232-RPM

ESTATE OF CONSTANCE L. LUCAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

HCA 401(k) PLAN and/or HCA HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

_____________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal [24] filed November 3, 2012, it is

ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their

own costs, expenses, and fees.

DATED: November 5th, 2012

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02232-RPM Document 25 Filed 11/05/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH

DWAYNE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERWIN MOZER, M.D., and

NURSE JANE DOE, individually,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 19, 2012.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Pay Debt” [filed April 16, 2012; docket #56].

Plaintiff’s motion requests “[his] right pursuant to H.J.R. 192, to pay any and all public debt

associated with Arapahoe County, Colorado District Court Case No. 08CR1039[.]” Even construing

the motion liberally, it is unclear to the Court exactly what Plaintiff seeks. Morever, Plaintiff has

not shown that the Court has jurisdiction to issue any order affecting a state criminal action in which

Plaintiff is involved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is denied. 

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 60 Filed 04/19/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02197-WYD-KMT

MARGARITA ROMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

NASH-FINCH COMPANY, d/b/a AVANZA SUPERMARKET,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Stipulated Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, filed June 1, 2012 [ECF No. 18]

is GRANTED. The claims and causes of action asserted in this matter are hereby

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear her/its own costs and expenses.

 Dated: June 4, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel 

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-02197-WYD-KMT Document 19 Filed 06/04/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT (23)



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated January 17, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of First Oak Brook
Bancshares, Inc.


We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-24145) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.
Employees' Savings and Stock Ownership Plan and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-82800) pertaining to First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. 1987 Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 17, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc.
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 24, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Judge Christine M. Arguello

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES D. WELCH, and

AMRA WELCH, as nominee/alter ego of James D. Welch,

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING JULY 25, 2013

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. (Doc. # 2.) On July 25, 2013, Judge Mix 

issued a Recommendation, advising the Court to grant the Government’s Renewed 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 103). (Doc. # 110.) The Recommendation 

stated that “the parties shall have fourteen (14) days after service of this 

Recommendation to serve and file any written objections in order to obtain 

reconsideration by the District Judge to whom this case is assigned.” (Id. at 19.) 

It further informed the parties that “failure to serve and file specific, written objections 

waives de novo review of the Recommendation by the District Judge.” (Id.) Neither 

party has filed objections. 

“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate=s 

report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 

1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (observing 

Case 1:11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM Document 111 Filed 08/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of 

a magistrate=s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, 

when neither party objects to those findings”)). Having reviewed the Recommendation, 

the Court discerns no clear error on the face of the record and finds that Judge Mix’s 

reasoning is sound.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States 

Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (Doc. # 110) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED as an Order 

of this Court. Pursuant to the Recommendation, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Government’s Renewed Motion for Summary 

Judgment (Doc. # 103) is GRANTED such that JUDGMENT WILL ENTER against 

Defendant Welch in the amount of $6,601,594.09 as of September 30, 2012, plus 

applicable statutory accruals (specifically, interest and statutory additions accrued but 

unassessed, as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, 

6651, 6654; 26 C.F.R. § 301.6621-1) from that date. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS CASE, 

the Government SHALL SUBMIT a calculation of the applicable statutory accruals in 

this case. 

DATED: August 15 , 2013

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge

2

Case 1:11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM Document 111 Filed 08/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
MANTYLA, McREYNOLDS AND ASSOCIATES, C.P.A's
A Professional Corporation


December 27, 1999


United State Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549


To whom it may concern:

We hereby agree with the disclosure statements made by Cadapult Graphic
Systems, Inc., a corporation formerly known as Seafoods Plus, Ltd., with
respect to our being dismissed as the principal accountants and our audit
reports on the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1997.  We further agree with the Company's disclosure that there were no
disagreements with us on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

/s/ Mantyla, McReynolds & Assoc.

Mantyla, McReynolds & Associates
Certified Public Accountants
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending January 19, 2008FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCAIXA DE AFORROS DE VIGO, OURENSE E PONTEVEDRA                                                                          FBSEACaixa de Aforros de Vigo, Ourense e Pontevedra, Vigo, Spain, to establish international bank branches in New York, New York, Chicago, Illinois, Los Angeles, California, and Houston, Texas.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableCITIZENS BANCORP, INC.                                                                                                  CICPrior change in control notice filed by C. Steven Lewis, New Tazewell, Tennessee, to acquire an additional 13.05 percent of the outstanding shares of Citizens Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiary, Citizens Bank, both of New Tazewell, Tennessee.  Pro forma ownership will equal 28.45 percent.Newspaper: 01/10/2008Federal Register: 01/23/2008Greensburg Bancshares, Inc.                                                                                             * 3A1Greensburg Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Bank of Greensburg, both of Greensburg, Louisiana.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not availableSTERLING BANK                                                                                                           * BranchSterling Bank, Lantana, Florida, to establish a branch located at 2465 Wilton Manors Drive, Wilton Manors, Florida.Newspaper: 11/02/2007Federal Register: Not applicableSUNTRUST BANKS, INC.                                                                                                    * 3A5SunTrust Banks, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, to merge with GB&T Bancshares, Inc., Gainesville, Georgia, and thereby acquire its subsidiaries, Gainesville Bank & Trust, Gainesville, Georgia;  Mountain State Bank, Dawsonville, Georgia;  First National Bank of Gwinnett, Duluth, Georgia;  First National Bank of the South, Milledgeville, Georgia;  Home Town Bank of Villa Rica, Villa Rica, Georgia;  Community Trust Bank, Hiram, Georgia; and United Bank & Trust Company, Rockmart, Georgia.Newspaper: 01/13/2008Federal Register: 01/15/2008
Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM Document 8 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM Document 8 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02224-WJM Document 8 Filed 10/20/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 3
Case 1:08-cv-00169-MML Document 15 Filed 06/15/08 Page 1 of 1
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2132

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using surplus funds to

make any investment in securities, other than government and municipal

securities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 2001

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. FLAKE, Mr.

SESSIONS, Mr. SUNUNU, and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

A BILL

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from using surplus

funds to make any investment in securities, other than

government and municipal securities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Private Economy Pro5 tection Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USING FEDERAL SURPLUS FUNDS

7 TO INVEST IN PRIVATE SECURITIES.

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec9 retary of the Treasury may not use surplus funds to make
2

•HR 2132 IH

1 any investment in securities (within the meaning of the

2 securities laws of the United States) other than govern3 ment and municipal securities. For purposes of the pre4 ceding sentence, the term ‘surplus’ shall have the meaning

5 given to such term by section 3(7) of the Congressional

6 Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 622(7)).

Æ