alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense Office of Inspector General. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG), as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of SES performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance awards to the Inspector General. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 23, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Phyllis Hughes, Director, Human Capital Advisory Services, Administration and Management, DoD OIG, 400 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 602-4516. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following executives are appointed to the DoD OIG, PRB: 

Karen Ellis, Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, Department of Agriculture.

Marla Freedman, Assistant Inspector General for Audit, Department of Treasury.

William Maharay, Deputy Inspector General for Audit Services, Department of Energy.

Lisa Martin, General Counsel, United States Postal Service, Office of Inspector General.

Andrew Patchan, Assistant Inspector General for Audits and Attestations, Federal Reserve Board.

Peter Usowski, Assistant Inspector General for Investigations, Central Intelligence Agency.

Dated: September 22, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E8-22867 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Otoniel TORRES-LANDIN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70472.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 2003.*

Decided March 12, 2002.

*243Before LAY,** HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Donald P. Lay, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Otoniel Torres-Landin (“Torres-Landin”) seeks relief claiming that: (1) the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (“NACARA”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment because it impermissibly favors aliens from Nicaragua and Cuba; and (2) NACARA is overbroad because it was intended to benefit aliens who have taken risks in escaping from oppressive governments, yet grants relief to all Nicaraguan or Cuban immigrants regardless of their opposition to the interests of the United States.

“ ‘Line-drawing’ decisions made by Congress ... in the context of immigration and naturalization must be upheld if they are rationally related to a legitimate government purpose,” *Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir.2001), and “[c]hallengers have the burden to negate ‘every conceivable basis which might support [a legislative classification] ... whether or not the basis has a foundation in the record.’ ” *Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft,*293 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir.2002) (quoting *Heller v. Doe,*509 U.S. 312, 320-21, 113 S.Ct. 2637, 125 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993)). Torres-Landin has not met this burden. A rational basis exists for distinguishing among groups of aliens based on conditions in their home country. Further, we have specifically upheld NACARA’s decision “to favor aliens from specific war-torn countries” as a “rational diplomatic decision to encourage such aliens to remain in the United States.” *Ram,*243 F.3d at 517. *See also Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft,*291 F.3d 594, 603 (9th Cir.2002). Torres-Landin’s argument is, therefore, foreclosed by our precedents.

PETITION DENIED. The stay of deportation previously entered shall be VACATED upon issuance of the mandate.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CONSENT
      OF LAROCHE PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD.


LAROCHE
      PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD.





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM





ENGINEERS
      AND GEOLOGISTS





As
      independent oil and gas consultants, LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. hereby
      consents to the use of and reference to its name, and the inclusion of
      and references to its report relating to proved oil and gas reserves of
      Westside Energy Corporation (the "Company") as of December 31, 2005 in
      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form l0-QSB for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2006, and the incorporation by reference thereof into
      the previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC file no.
      333-124890) filed on May 13, 2005 and the previously filed Registration
      Statement on Form S-8 (SEC file no. 333-114686) filed on April 21,
      2004.





LaRoche
      Petroleum Consultants. Ltd.





By:  *Is!* Bill
      Kazmann





Name:  Bill
      Kazmann





Title:  Partner








Dallas.
      Texas


November
      16, 2006
Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 3 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 4 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 5 of 6Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM Document 122 Filed 01/12/07 Page 6 of 6
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00060-CR

NO. 09-21-00061-CR

__________________

KEVIN KAMPER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 16-26420, 16-26421

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed on March 

18, 2021. Appellant’s brief was due on April 19, 2021, but was not filed, and we 

notified the appellant1 that neither the brief of the appellant nor a motion for 

extension of time to file the brief has been filed.

1

Appellant appears to be pro se on appeal. 
2

We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). We direct the trial court to determine whether 

appellant desires to pursue his appeal. If appellant desires to pursue his appeal, we 

direct the trial court to determine why the brief of the appellant has not been filed 

and whether appellant has retained counsel who has abandoned the appeal. This

Court notes that the trial court determined in its order denying appellant’s motion 

for forensic DNA testing and appointment of counsel that appellant’s motion did not 

demonstrate entitlement to appointed counsel. 

The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial judge, 

shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The transcription of the court reporter’s 

notes from the hearing and the recommendation of the trial court judge are to be filed 

on or before July 28, 2021. 

ORDER ENTERED June 28, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00371

- CR

IN RE ROY LEE BOYKIN

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 1

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed January 24, 2018

[OT06]

1 In light of our disposition, all pending motions are dismissed as moot.I n re Boykin Page 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chad Evans,

Petitioner

v. No. 1:08-cv-105-JD

Warden, 

New Hampshire State Prison, 

Respondent 

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Chad Evans files a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.

As grounds, Evans states:

1. He incorporates by reference all factual assertions and

legal arguments in his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254.

2. Evans agrees that no evidentiary hearing is necessary to

resolve the pending claims and that the Court may enter judgment

on the pleadings. 

3. For the reasons stated in his Petition, as well as his

Memorandum of Law in support of both his Objection to the

Warden’s Motion for Summary Judgment and his Cross-Motion for

Summary Judgment, Evans asserts that he is entitled to summary

judgment on the pleadings.

WHEREFORE, Mr. Evans respectfully requests that this

Honorable Court: 

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 22 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

a. Grant his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; and

b. Order the Sentence Review Division of the New Hampshire

Superior Court to reinstate Evans’s sentence of 28 years to life

in prison. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ David M. Rothstein 

By 

 David M. Rothstein #5991

 Deputy Chief Appellate Defender

 Appellate Defender Program

 2 White Street

 Concord, NH 03301

 603) 228-9218

 Email: drothstein@piercelaw.edu 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion has

been emailed this 17th day of March, 2010, to:

Elizabeth C. Woodcock

ASsistant Assistant Attorney General

at: Elizabeth.Woodcock@doj.nh.gov

/s/ David M. Rothstein 

 David M. Rothstein

DATED: March 17, 2010

Case 1:08-cv-00105-JD Document 22 Filed 03/17/10 Page 2 of 2
**
Exhibit 31.1 

Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function 

of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)

**CERTIFICATION**

I, KevinJ. Cullum, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2018-A (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. I amresponsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association 

Date: June 26, 2020 

 
By: 
/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
Kevin J. CullumPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofNissan Motor Acceptance Corporation(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)**
**Exhibit 15.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-135116 as amended, 333-125978, 333-122785, 333-107160, 333-100472, 333-81524, 333-13102, 333-07636, 033-35332, 033-04813 and 333-151490) of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of our report dated June 19, 2008,relating to the financial statements of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, which appears in this Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers AB 

Stockholm, Sweden 

April 28, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

 v. Case No. 08-cr-129-01-SM

Anthony Rabbia

O R D E R

Defendant's assented-to motion to continue the trial (document no. 27) is

granted. Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2009 trial period. Defendant shall

file a Waiver of Speedy Trial Rights not later than June 15, 2009. On the filing of

such waiver, his continuance shall be effective.

The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would unreasonably deny

the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into

account the exercise of due diligence under the circumstances.

Final Pretrial Conference: July 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM 

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 28 Filed 06/02/09 Page 1 of 2
2

Jury Selection: July 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM

SO ORDERED.

June 2, 2009 _________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 U. S. Probation

 U. S. Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00129-SM Document 28 Filed 06/02/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH

DWAYNE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERWIN MOZER, M.D., and

NURSE JANE DOE, individually,

Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 21, 2012.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint in Compliance with FRCP 15 to Add

Claim of Negligence [filed February 16, 2012; docket #44] is denied without prejudice for

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) requiring that “[e]very ... written motion ...

must be signed ... by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” In addition, the Plaintiff failed

to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G, which provides that “[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex

parte, shall be accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name

and address of the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service.” Plaintiff’s motion

contains no such certificate. Finally, Plaintiff failed to attach a proposed Second Amended

Complaint with his request to allow the Court to determine whether “justice so requires” the

amendment. 

Accordingly, the Plaintiff may correct these procedural deficiencies and re-file a motion in

accordance with this order on or before March 2, 2012. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 8.1A, the

Clerk of the Court is directed to provide the Plaintiff with a copy of a form Prisoner Complaint with

the mailing of this order. The Plaintiff will title his proposed amended pleading, “Second Amended

Prisoner Complaint.”

Case 1:11-cv-02189-PAB-MEH Document 47 Filed 02/21/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 135




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert O. Bratton, state and attest that I am the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of First Charter Corporation (the Company). I hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that  
    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2004 containing financial statements (the periodic report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  
    the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented. /s/ Robert O. BrattonName: Robert O. Bratton
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date: March 11, 2005
 136
Label	Description
Date
Financial CP (millions)		Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of commercial paper issued by financial corporations millions of dollars
Nonfinancial CP (millions)    	Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of commercial paper issued by nonfinancial corporations millions of dollars
Asset-backed CP (millions)    	Total U.S. money market funds investment holdings of asset-backed commercial paper millions of dollars
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

************************************* 

Wayne Carter, Toni Cellucci, and * 

Stacey Durgin, individually and * 

on behalf of all similarly situated * 

persons, * 

 Plaintiffs * Dkt. # 1:07-cv-00023-SM 

 * 

vs. * 

 * 

New Hampshire Department of Health and * 

Human Services, Commissioner, * 

 Defendant. * 

************************************* 

PROPOSED CLASS NOTICE ORDER

 This Court having read and reviewed the: 

1. Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Proposed Class Action 

Settlement; 

2. Proposed Final Order; and 

3. Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement 

Makes the following order relative thereto: 

A. The Court preliminarily approves the proposed Settlement/Final 

Order. 

B. The Court orders the Defendant to: 

1) Post the attached Notice (Attachment - A) in a prominent 

public place in each Department of Health and Human 

Services District Office and keep this notice posted until 

March 

__________________ [date referred to in E below]; and, 

18, 2008 at 1:30 pm; 

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM Document 38 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 2
2

2) Within 30 days mail a copy of the attached Notice 

(Attachment - A) to all Class Members whose APTD 

applications are pending with the Department on the date of 

this Order. 

3) Distribute the attached Notice (Attachment – A) to all Class 

Members who apply for APTD between the date the mailing 

list for the Notice described in Paragraph B(2) above is 

generated and the hearing date set forth in Paragraph E 

below.

C. The Court finds that the Class Members shall be adequately notified 

through the posting, distribution, and individual mailing. 

D. The final Order of Judgment shall be stayed pending a hearing on any 

objection. 

E. The Court shall conduct a hearing to consider the Proposed Final Order on 

______________________at . The Defendant shall finalize the 

attached Notice (Attachment-A) so that Class Members are instructed to 

file any objections to the settlement on or before the day previous to the 

hearing date, and so that the hearing date and time appear in the final 

paragraph of that Notice. 

_________________________ 

Steven J. McAuliffe 

Chief Judge 

Date:_____________________ 

March 18, 2008 at 1:30 p.m. December 21, 2008

 /s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

Dated: December 21, 2007 

c

c

: 

A

l

l 

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:07-cv-00023-SM Document 38 Filed 12/21/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2099 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 376
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2099

                          [Report No. 107-627]

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2001

  Mr. Baird introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

                           September 4, 2002

  Additional sponsors: Mr. McDermott, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Inslee, Mr. 
 Dicks, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Wu, and 
                          Ms. Hooley of Oregon

                           September 4, 2002

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 7, 
                                 2001]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR RESERVE.

    Section 502(d) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 110 Stat. 4154) is amended 
by striking ``$5,000,000'' and all that follows through the period and 
inserting ``$15,000,000 for development costs associated with capital 
projects consistent with the cooperative management plan, except that 
the Federal share of such development costs shall not exceed 50 percent 
of the total costs.''.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 376

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2099

                          [Report No. 107-627]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
   provide adequate funding authorization for the Vancouver National 
                           Historic Reserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 4, 2002

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```