alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

     We    consent   to   the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
     Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. s 33-22849, 33-36041, 33-
     42002,  33-50430,  and  33-64407)  pertaining to the 1985 Stock
     Option  Plan  of  Carrington  Laboratories,  Inc., Registration
     Statements  (Form  S-8  No. s 33-64403, 33-64405, and 33-55920)
     pertaining   to   the  1995  Management  Compensation  Plan  of
     Carrington  Laboratories,  Inc.,  the 1995 Stock Option Plan of
     Carrington  Laboratories, Inc., and the Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan   of  Carrington  Laboratories,  Inc.,  respectively,  the
     Registration  Statements (Form S-3 No.'s 33-60833 and 33-17177)
     pertaining  to  the  1995 and 1997 private placements of common
     stock  of  Carrington  Laboratories, Inc., respectively, of our
     report   dated   February   25,   1998,  with  respect  to  the
     consolidated  financial  statements of Carrington Laboratories,
     Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
     for  the year ended December 31, 1997 filed with the Securities
     and Exchange Commission.


                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP


     Dallas, Texas
     March 27, 1998
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0699

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAITLYN REBECCA HOLMES,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable John C. Brown , Dis trict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2024

01/03/2024
Case Number: DA 22-0699
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 2Federal Reserve Bank of: New YorkFilings received during the week ending December 8, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodBANCO ESPIRITO SANTO DE INVESTIMENTO, S.A.                                                                              FBSEABanco Espirito Santo de Investimento, S.A., Lisbon, Portugal, to establish a branch in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 7(d) of the International Banking Act.Newspaper: Not availableFederal Register: Not applicableINVESTORS BANCORP, MHC                                                                                                  * 4c8Investors Bancorp, MHC and Investors Bancorp, Inc., both of Short Hills, New Jersey to acquire Summit Federal Bankshares, MHC, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Summit Federal Bankshares, Inc., and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Summit Federal Savings Bank, all of Summit, New Jersey.Newspaper: 12/14/2007Federal Register: 12/20/2007TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, THE                                                                                              * 3A1
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2191 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2191

         To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-methyl imidazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2001

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-methyl imidazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2-METHYL IMIDAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.30.28    2-methyl          Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     imidazole (CAS                                                          31/2004          ''
                     No. 693-98-1)                                                                             .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2933.29.90)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joshua Ward, Appellant.

[807 NYS2d 308]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered October 14, 2004, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid and unchallenged waiver of appeal precludes his current argument that the sentence imposed upon him following his violation of probation was excessive *(see People v Gorovoy,*309 AD2d 764 [2003]; *People v Bennett,*269 AD2d 401 [2000]; *but see People v Venable,*16 AD3d 771 [2005]). Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, his attorney’s waiver of an updated presentence investigation prior to the imposition of the sentence did not deprive him of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Segar,*295 AD2d 628, 629 [2002]; *People v Moon,*225 AD2d 826, 827-828 [1996]; *see also People v Ortega,*1 AD3d 533 [2003]). Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.
Immucell
    56 Evergreen Drive
    Portlano, Maine 04103
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    February 7, 1996

    Carrington Laboratories, Inc.
    Attention: President and CEO
    2001 Walnut Hill Lane
    Irving, Texas 75038

    Dear Sir:

    I talked to Bill Yates on the phone yesterday concerning our license 
    agreement dated September 29, 1994.  We licensed acemannan from Carrington 
    to test in a crypto vaccine for calves.  After repeated efforts in 1995, 
    we concluded in November that it does not give the immune boost to our 
    crypto vaccine that we were looking for.  Therefore, per the terms of the 
    license agreement, I am giving you notice of cancellation.

    I mentioned to Bill that we may have other applications of acemannan in 
    animal health products.  We both agreed that we should address its use in 
    those applications when they arise rather than try to keep the current 
    license agreement going.

    I would like to note that Bill was very helpful as we worked through our 
    crypto vaccine program.  We spent well in excess of $100,000 last year on 
    the budget but simply couldn t get a combination to work.  We continue our 
    search.

    We wish Carrington well in its corporate development and hope to be able 
    to do business again in the future.

    Respectfully yours,

    /s/Thomas C. Hatch

    Thomas C. Hatch
    President and CEO
#### In the Matter of Richard A. Goetz, an Attorney, Resignor.

[745 NYS2d 736]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83). Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Hayes, Bums and Gorski, JJ. (Filed June 24, 2002.)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15.3


                         CONSENT OF MET-CHEM CANADA INC.


Montreal, March 30, 2005


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION               ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION
450 Fifth St. N. W.                              Suite 1903, Box 55
Washington, DC 20259                             20 Queen Street West
USA                                              Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8


SUBJECT:        Our reports dated April 2001
                MINERAL RESERVES AND RESOURCES

We hereby consent to the inclusion of references to our reports dated April
2001, regarding the mineral reserves and resources of the Copper Rand 5000,
Cedar Bay, Corner Bay Inner Block Deposit, Eastmain Property, Bachelor Lake
Property, Chevrier Property and Discovery Property, which appear under Item 4 in
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Campbell Resources Inc. (the "Corporation")
for the year ended December 31st, 2004.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (registration Nos. 33-2896, 33-91824,
333-93063 and 333-6236) pertaining to the Corporation's Employee Incentive Plan
and Directors' Stock Option Plan.

MET-CHEM CANADA INC.





(s) Subbiah Srinivasan
-----------------------------------------------------
Subbiah Srinivasan, Eng
Vice-President and Managing Director
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports:Boston |New York |Philadelphia |Cleveland |Richmond |AtlantaChicago |St. Louis |Minneapolis |Kansas City |Dallas |San FranciscoDistrict: 6Federal Reserve Bank of: AtlantaFilings received during the week ending November 17, 2007FilerFiling TypeFiling ProposalEnd of Comment PeriodCOMPASS BANK                                                                                                            * BranchCompass Bank, Birmingham, Alabama, to establish branches in the following locations: 3490 Salida Street, Aurora, Colorado, to be known as the Aurora-Salida Branch; 4501 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas, to be known as the Fort Worth-Camp Bowie Branch; intersection of Briar Forest Drive and Eldridge Road, Houston, Texas, to be known as the Houston-Eldridge Branch; 170 University Boulevard, Round Rock, Texas, to be known as the Round Rock-University Branch; and 631 Southwest Military Drive, San Antonio, Texas, to be known as the San Antonio-Military Branch.Newspaper: 11/21/2007Federal Register: Not applicableOLD SOUTHERN BANK                                                                                                       * BranchOld Southern Bank, Orlando, Florida, to establish a branch located at 1815 West State Road 434, Suite 230, Longwood, Florida.Newspaper: 11/28/2007Federal Register: Not applicable
#### DORMAN v. DORMAN.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

Sept. 18, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1936.

T. B. Ellis, Jr., of Ft. Pierce, for appellant.

Sumner. & Sumner, of Ft. Pierce, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed suit for divorce, appellant filed motion to dismiss, answer, and counterclaim. Appellee then filed motion to dismiss.

The chancellor, after hearing, entered order dismissing the cause on complainant’s motion at complainant’s cost.

The counterclaim prayed divorce upon the allegations made therein. The allegations of the counterclaim were evidently intended to show that the complainant was possessed of a violent and ungovernable temper, or that complainant had been guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment of the defendant, or perhaps both; but the allegations fall short of being sufficient to charge either ground of divorce.

Therefore, the counterclaim was properly dismissed. It appears from the record, however, thát the defendant on July 29, 1935, filed in one document answer, motion to dismiss bill of complaint, and also counterclaim, and on July 31, 1935, complainant filed praecipe or motion to dismiss the cause. The appeal is by the defendant in the court below, and while the order recites that the cause is dismissed on motion of complainant at complainant’s cost, it is equally as affirmatively responsive to defendant’s motion to dismiss which was then pending before the chancellor un-disposed of. As both parties moved to dismiss the cause, the appellant is bound by his motion and cannot now be heard to complain or to insist that the chancellor committed error in entering an order such as he had specifically moved the chancellor to enter; so the order appealed from should be, and is, affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

ELLIS, P. J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

WHITFIELD, C. J., and BROWN and DAVIS, JJ., concur in the opinion and judgment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Criminal No. 08-cr-120-01-JD

Kenason Keo Siphanthone

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no.

14) filed by defendant is granted.

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days. The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), for the

reasons set forth in the motion.

SO ORDERED.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

United States District Judge

Date: December 26, 2008

cc: Donald A. Feith, AUSA

Jessica C. Brown, AFD

U.S. Marshal

U.S. Probation

Case 1:08-cr-00120-JD Document 15 Filed 12/26/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 55084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicant

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicant have filed with 
the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a Non-
Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicant should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicant:

Nautica Cargo Services Inc. dba Navinsa Line, 7911 N.W. 72 Ave. 219B, 
Miami, FL 33166, Officer: Christian A. Hernandez, President (Qualifying 
Individual).

    Dated: September 19, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-22422 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 913 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 15, 2008.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the 
part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the 
Senate to notify the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 
has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be 
pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Andrew Joseph DYKEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.

Oct. 10, 1956.

Gladstone L. Kohloss and Robert Eagan, Orlando, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Jos. P. Manners, ■ Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

HOBSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court entered consequent upon a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree without recommendation of mercy.

The record before us discloses a brutal and shocking crime. The only point raised which is of merit is the propriety of the admission in evidence of an indescribably horrible photograph of the deceased lying on a mortuary slab. The deceased had been shot in the head with a shotgun. The State contends that there was no error in the admission of this photograph because it showed the fatal woimd of the deceased. Authority is cited in support of this contention to the effect that competent and material evidence should not be excluded merely because it may have a tendency to influence and prejudice the jury beyond the strict limits of the purpose for which it is admissible. Lindberg v. State, 134 Fla. 786, 184 So. 662; Mardorff v. State, 143 Fla. 64, 196 So. 625; 2 Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, 11th ed., Sec. 773. This argument, however, presupposes that the photograph was independently relevant. We find that it was not. The location of the wound was freely conceded and abundantly proved by other evidence. The photograph did not include any part of the- locus of the crime and was too far in time and space therefrom to have any independent probative *867value. We agree with appellant that the introduction of this photograph in evidence could have had no purpose or effect other than to inflame the minds of the jurors. We cannot say, in a first degree murder case without recommendation of mercy, that an error of this character and magnitude was not prejudicial. It follows that the judgment appealed from must therefore be, and it is hereby, reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

TERRELL, J., not participating.
Exhibit
10.33




AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO




FOREBEARANCE AND WARRANT
MODIFICATION AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2, dated as of May
14, 2009 (this “Amendment”), to that certain forbearance and waiver modification
agreement, dated February 25, 2009, as amended by that certain Amendment No 1 to
forbearance and waiver modification agreement, dated May 6, 2009 (collectively,
the “Agreement”), by and between NATIONAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), and
CHRISTOPHER C. DEWEY
(the “Lender “).





W I T N E S S E T
H




WHEREAS, as of the date hereof there is
currently a principal amount of $500,000 due the Lender; and




WHEREAS,
the Company and the Lender wish to amend the Agreement on the terms set forth
herein.




NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises herein
contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree to amend the Agreement
as follows:




1.           Definitions; References;
Continuation of Agreement.  Unless otherwise specified herein,
each term used herein that is defined in the Agreement shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the Agreement.  Each reference to “hereof,”
“hereto,” “hereunder,” “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference,
and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference,
contained in the Agreement shall from and after the date hereof refer to the
Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as amended hereby, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall continue unmodified and remain in full force
and effect.  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
having the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.




2.           Amendment.  Section
3 of the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: the date “May 12, 2009” is
hereby deleted and in its place and stead the date “May 22, 2009” is
inserted.




3.           Counterparts.  This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, all of which when taken
together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become
effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the
other party, it being understood that both parties need not sign the same
counterpart.  In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile
transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature
shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose
behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such
facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original thereof.





4.           Governing
Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed on the date first above written.




NATIONAL HOLDINGS
CORPORATION







By:  /S/ MARK
GOLDWASSER


Mark
Goldwasser, CEO








/S/ CHRISTOPHER C.
DEWEY


Christopher C.
Dewey
|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /                  s                  / Andrew Cimerman |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | -----------------------------------                     |   |
|   | Andrew                  Cimerman                        |   |
|   | President                  and                          |   |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer                |   |

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /                  s                  / Marie M. May |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | --------------------------                           |   |
|   | Marie                  M. May                        |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer             |   |
|   | Date:                  October 18, 2007              |   |