alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2048 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 290
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2048

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2001

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           December 13, 2001

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require a report on the operations of the State Justice Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL ON STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE.

    Section 213 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10712) is amended by striking ``On October 1, 1987'' and inserting 
``Not later than October 1, 2002''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 5, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 290

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2048

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require a report on the operations of the State Justice Institute

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 13, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 08-cr-07-01/02-SM

Wanjira Taliaferro and

Veronica Melendez

O R D E R

Defendant Taliaferro’s motion to continue the final pretrial conference and

trial is granted (document 15). Trial has been rescheduled for the July 2008

trial period. Defendant Taliaferro shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights not

later than March 28, 2008. On the filing of such waiver, his continuance shall

be effective. 

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), in that failure to grant a continuance would

unreasonably deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence under the

circumstances. 

Final Pretrial Conference: June 24, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

Jury Selection: July 8, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Case 1:08-cr-00007-SM Document 16 Filed 03/17/08 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Steven J. McAuliffe

 Chief Judge

March 17, 2008

cc: Robert Daniels, Esq.

Jeffrey Levin, Esq. 

Michael Zaino, AUSA

US Probation

US Marshal

Case 1:08-cr-00007-SM Document 16 Filed 03/17/08 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                               LARSCOM CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11.1


                               LARSCOM INCORPORATED
             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended             Nine Months Ended
                                             -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                   September 30,                 September 30,
                                             -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                1997           1996           1997           1996
                                             -----------   -----------     -----------   -----------
                                                                  (Unaudited)
<S>                                          <C>           <C>             <C>           <C>
Net income                                   $  2,457       $  1,554       $  6,332       $  4,101
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

Weighted average Class A and B
     Common Stock outstanding                  18,096         14,193         18,058         14,193
Weighted average common stock
     equivalents related to stock options
     issued to employees                            2              -              -              -
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
Shares used in per share calculations          18,098         14,193         18,058         14,193
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
Net income per share (1)                     $   0.14       $   0.11       $   0.35       $   0.29
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                             ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
</TABLE>


(1)  Net income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30,
1996 is supplemental and is calculated as described in Note 1 of the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of the Company's
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
6

A.2. Average Size of Non-real-estate Bank Loans Made to FarmersThousands of dollars

Size of loan Si

Purpose of loan (thousands of dollars) 

Other Farm 

current machinery 3 10 25 100

All Feeder Other operating and to to to and Sm

Period loans livestock livestock expenses1 equipment Other2 9 24 99 over mid

1997...... 31.40 42.33 25.99 16.82 17.79 97.18 3.76 14.86 45.78 385.35 1998...... 32.36 41.46 24.32 18.16 28.10 127.91 3.73 14.78 45.40 357.03 1999...... 30.92 35.63 26.42 21.43 31.82 101.12 3.82 14.83 46.80 322.06 2000...... 26.30 43.25 25.96 21.27 29.27 48.49 3.85 14.94 45.33 258.41 2001...... 29.40 39.71 29.75 20.03 31.76 62.16 3.87 14.76 45.45 269.62 2002...... 28.77 47.63 33.26 21.43 24.44 62.04 3.72 15.02 45.83 269.92 2003...... 30.74 67.77 36.98 21.44 33.40 64.60 3.75 14.81 47.26 276.39 2004...... 39.38 68.02 52.88 25.95 47.58 110.83 3.81 14.82 46.26 360.52 2005...... 40.42 69.13 47.05 26.41 63.49 99.94 3.83 14.62 47.14 333.02 2006...... 49.71 65.53 59.36 32.84 74.12 138.48 4.90 14.96 46.68 340.26 2007...... 48.27 64.93 50.33 36.27 47.41 117.22 5.35 15.11 46.62 302.38 2008...... 58.61 76.08 70.62 44.10 45.70 136.09 5.49 15.03 46.79 335.20 2005: Q4... 39.08 83.40 41.58 24.45 43.37 97.49 3.92 14.83 46.73 270.45 2006: Q1... 43.76 45.56 49.62 37.78 39.28 96.24 3.81 15.09 47.28 288.50  Q2... 51.32 51.29 50.51 32.34 123.28 132.75 5.39 14.82 45.54 364.91  Q3... 51.48 81.93 89.64 26.57 50.49 172.18 5.41 15.01 45.16 377.96  Q4... 53.61 80.54 57.82 33.44 71.05 155.58 5.56 14.96 48.79 341.00 2007: Q1... 58.33 76.05 54.29 50.88 32.69 120.07 5.34 15.10 47.15 296.76  Q2... 39.55 48.25 33.93 32.08 41.55 95.17 5.40 15.11 45.96 276.68  Q3... 42.93 42.18 63.99 28.28 62.22 108.75 5.26 15.19 45.88 296.12  Q4... 54.29 84.90 53.85 36.07 53.00 145.08 5.39 15.03 47.47 335.44 2008: Q1... 66.99 70.42 57.84 57.17 37.17 152.28 5.63 15.42 46.38 339.22  Q2... 53.03 64.25 58.32 39.04 59.60 127.92 5.40 14.76 46.37 310.75  Q3... 56.57 97.26 91.69 40.35 42.95 136.38 5.42 14.53 46.29 368.80  Q4... 58.67 82.63 77.87 41.38 39.40 131.00 5.55 15.40 47.93 328.69 2009: Q1... 73.87 67.25 59.90 72.04 50.22 112.97 5.38 14.98 48.10 384.54  Q2... 47.33 47.69 45.07 41.40 33.44 98.43 5.38 15.17 46.75 308.72  Note. Data are estimates from the Federal Reserve System’s Survey of the Terms of Bank Lending to Farmers. Quarterly estimates aannual rate and are based on loans made during the first full week of the second month of the quarter. 1. Loans used primarily to finance such items as current crop production expenses and the care and feeding of livestock (including p 2. Typically loans for which the lender does not know the purpose. 3. Portfolios with $25 million or less in farm loans. 4. Portfolios with more than $25 million in farm loans.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIR E

United States of America

V .

Nicole Clock Hanlon

Criminal No . 07-cr-245-01-JD

O R D E R

The assented to motion to reschedule jury trial (document no .

12) filed by defendant is granted .

Defendant shall file a waiver of speedy trial rights within 10

days . The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting

a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, 18 U .S .C . § 3161 (h) (8) (B) (iv) , for the

reasons set forth in the motion .

SO ORDERED .

/s/Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

Joseph A . DiClerico, Jr .

United States District Judge

Date : May 12, 200 8

cc : Jessica Brown, Esq .

Jennifer Davis, Esq .

U .S . Marsha l

U .S . Probation

Case 1:07-cr-00245-JD Document 13 Filed 05/12/08 Page 1 of 1
218 La. 395

#### PUGH v. PUGH.

No. 39593.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1950.

See also 216 La. 239, 43 So.2d 594.

Alcide J. Weysham, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

James R. Parkerson, Franklin, for defendant-appellee.

PONDER, Justice.

The plaintiff brought suit against her husband for separation from bed and board and for a dissolution of the community of acquets and gains. The husband, the defendant, answered denying the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition. The case was tried and the lower court gave judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the plaintiff’s demands. The plaintiff has appealed.

The plaintiff alleges in her petition that her husband was guilty of cruel treatment, habitual intemperance and that he had humiliated and embarrassed her in the presence of his friends by making fun of the manner in which she talked. She also alleged that the defendant stated that he no longer loved her and would leave her when her son finished school. All of these allegations were denied by the defendant. The only testimony produced by the plaintiff to support the allegations of her petition was her testimony and that of one Glenn James, who testified that he saw the defendant intoxicated on one occasion and on other occasions when he 'had been drinking but not intoxicated. In rebuttal to this testimony, the defendant produced several prominent witnesses who testified that the defendant was not guilty of any of the charges set forth in the plaintiff’s petition. The trial court was of the opinion that the plaintiff had failed to- prove the allegations set forth in her petition. After a careful reading of the testimony in this case we have arrived at the same conclusion. Moreover, the judgment of the lower court cannot be reversed on questions of fact unless there is manifest error in its findings. We find no such error present in this case.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001023877
<NAME>                          Goung Hei Investment Co., Ltd.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      0
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 0
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                             17
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (17)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          0
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0



</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1881

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the graduated

income tax rates that apply to principal campaign committees of candidates for Congress shall apply to all comparable committees of candidates for State and local offices.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2001

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the graduated income tax rates that apply to principal campaign committees of candidates for Congress

shall apply to all comparable committees of candidates

for State and local offices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Can5 didate Fairness Act of 2001’’.
2

•HR 1881 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRADUATED RATES TO APPLY TO PRINCIPAL CAM2 PAIGN COMMITTEES OF CANDIDATES FOR

3 STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

5 527(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining

6 principal campaign committee) is amended to read as fol7 lows:

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this

9 subsection, the term ‘principal campaign com10 mittee’ means the political committee des11 ignated by a candidate for Congress or for

12 State or local public office as his principal cam13 paign committee for purposes of this sub14 section. A candidate for Congress may des15 ignate under the preceding sentence only a com16 mittee designated by such candidate as his prin17 cipal campaign committee for purposes of sec18 tion 302(e) of the Federal Election Campaign

19 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 432(e)).’’

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (B)

21 of section 527(h)(2) of such Code is amended by striking

22 ‘‘subparagraph (A)(ii)’’ and inserting ‘‘the first sentence

23 of subparagraph (A)’’.
3

•HR 1881 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Sandra Soto et al., Appellants, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[806 NYS2d 420]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated December 10, 2004, which denied their motion to strike the defendant’s answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 and based on spoliation of evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate willful and contumacious conduct on the part of the defendant which would warrant striking the answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Byrne v City of New York,*301 AD2d 489, 490 [2003]; *Cianciolo*
      *547
      *v Trism Specialized Carriers,*274 AD2d 369, 370 [2000]; *Vancott v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.,*271 AD2d 438 [2000]; *Brown v United Christian Evangelistic Assn.,*270 AD2d 378, 379 [2000]; *Harris v City of New York,*211 AD2d 663, 664 [1995]). Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to establish that the defendant negligently or intentionally destroyed key evidence, thereby depriving them of their ability to prove their claim *(see Chiu Ping Chung v Caravan Coach Co.,*285 AD2d 621 [2001]; *cf. Baglio v St. John's Queens Hosp.,*303 AD2d 341, 342 [2003]; *DiDomenico v C & S Aeromatik Supplies,*252 AD2d 41, 53 [1998]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
## In **T he**  **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**  No. 07 - 23 - 00004 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.L., A.L., R.L., G.L., B.L., AND D.L., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 72nd District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No . 2021 - 545,252 , Honorable J. Phillip Hays , Presiding No. 07 - 23 - 00005 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.L., A CHILD On Appeal from the 72nd District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021 - 545,250 , Honorable J. Phillip Hays , Presiding 

### March 2 , 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH , JJ.2 Appellant, G.L., appeals from two trial court orders terminating h is parental rights to h is children, G.L., A.L., R.L., G.L., B.L., D.L., and J.L. 1 Now pending before this Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion seeking voluntar y dismissal of the appeal s . The C ourt finds the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal s are dismissed . No motion s for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate s will issue forthwit h. Per Curiam

1 To protect the privacy of the parties , we refer to them by their initials. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 109.002(d); T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.8(a), (b).
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Alan B.
Levin


Alan B. Levin


Chief Financial Officer


February 17, 2009
Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 1 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 2 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 3 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 4 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 5 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 6 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 7 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 8 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 9 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 10 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 11 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 12 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 13 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 14 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 15 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 16 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 17 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 18 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 19 of 20

Case 1:09-cv-00003-SM   Document 5   Filed 04/01/09   Page 20 of 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,712
<PP&E>                                          48,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,294
<SALES>                                        662,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               662,729
<CGS>                                          514,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (447)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,087
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,929
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85


</TABLE>