alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.4. Delinquent Real Estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks

Share of outstanding farm real estate

Volume (billions of dollars) loans (percent)

Nonperforming Nonperforming 

Past due Past due

30 to 89 Past due 30 to 89 Past due

days, 90 days, Non- days, 90 days, NonPeriod Total accruing Total accruing accruing Total accuring Total accruing accruing

1998...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.9 1.2 1.7 .8 1.0

1999...... .6 .2 .4 .2 .2 2.0 .8 1.3 .5 .7

2000...... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001...... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002...... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003...... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004...... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005...... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006...... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007...... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

2008...... 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6 2.1 1.0 1.2 .2 1.0

2000: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .3 .3 3.2 1.3 1.9 .9 1.0

 Q2... .9 .3 .6 .3 .3 2.7 1.0 1.7 .7 1.0

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .2 .3 2.1 .7 1.4 .6 .8

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .2 .3 2.3 .9 1.4 .6 .8

2001: Q1... 1.1 .6 .5 .1 .4 3.2 1.7 1.4 .4 1.1

 Q2... .9 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.7 1.0 1.7 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .4 2.5 .9 1.7 .4 1.3

 Q4... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.6 1.1 1.5 .3 1.2

2002: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .2 .4 3.3 1.6 1.7 .5 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .6 .2 .4 2.6 1.0 1.6 .4 1.1

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.4 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q4... .9 .4 .6 .1 .5 2.5 1.0 1.5 .3 1.2

2003: Q1... 1.2 .6 .6 .1 .5 3.2 1.6 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q2... 1.0 .4 .7 .2 .5 2.6 .9 1.6 .4 1.2

 Q3... .9 .3 .6 .1 .5 2.3 .7 1.5 .3 1.2

 Q4... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 2.1 .7 1.3 .2 1.1

2004: Q1... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .4 2.5 1.1 1.4 .3 1.1

 Q2... .8 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.9 .7 1.2 .3 .9

 Q3... .7 .2 .5 .1 .4 1.7 .6 1.1 .2 .9

 Q4... .7 .3 .4 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

2005: Q1... .9 .4 .5 .1 .4 2.0 1.0 1.0 .2 .8

 Q2... .7 .3 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .6 1.0 .2 .8

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .5 .9 .2 .7

 Q4... .6 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6

2006: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.8 .9 .9 .2 .6

 Q2... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .8 .2 .6

 Q4... .7 .3 .3 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .5

2007: Q1... .9 .5 .4 .1 .3 1.6 .9 .7 .2 .5

 Q2... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.5 .7 .8 .2 .6

 Q3... .7 .3 .4 .1 .3 1.3 .6 .7 .2 .5

 Q4... .8 .4 .4 .1 .3 1.4 .7 .7 .1 .5

2008: Q1... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .3 1.7 .9 .8 .2 .6

 Q2... 1.0 .5 .5 .1 .4 1.6 .8 .9 .2 .7

 Q3... 1.0 .4 .6 .1 .5 1.6 .6 1.0 .1 .8

 Q4... 1.3 .6 .7 .1 .6 2.1 1.0 1.2 .2 1.0

2009: Q1... 1.8 .8 1.0 .1 .8 2.8 1.3 1.5 .2 1.3

 Note. Yearly data are as of December 31. Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.

24
BILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT



         FOR  VALUE   RECEIVED,   PowerTrader   Software   Inc.,  a  corporation
incorporated   pursuant  to  the  laws  of  the  Province  of  British  Columbia
("Seller"),  to PowerTrader,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation and parent of Seller
("Buyer"),  the  receipt  and  sufficiency  of  which  consideration  is  hereby
acknowledged, Seller by these presents does hereby convey, grant, bargain, sell,
transfer,  set over,  assign,  deliver and confirm unto Buyer and its successors
and assigns,  forever,  all of Seller's right,  title and interest in and to the
assets set forth Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Assets");


         TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Buyer and its  successors and assigns
forever.  Seller hereby  covenants  and agrees,  from time to time as reasonably
requested by Buyer,  its successors and assigns,  that Seller will do,  execute,
acknowledge  and deliver such  documents and  instruments  and take such further
actions as may be reasonably proper and necessary with respect to the conveying,
transferring and assigning of the Assets to Buyer and to carry out the intent of
the  Agreement,  and to vest in Buyer the entire  right,  title and  interest of
Seller in and to all of the Assets, subject to the terms of the Agreement.


         Seller hereby  warrants that: (i) Seller is the owner of the Assets and
has full right and title  thereto  and  authority  to convey the same;  (ii) the
Assets are free and clear of all liens and  encumbrances;  and (iii) Seller will
WARRANT AND DEFEND  Buyer's title to the Assets against the lawful claims of all
persons.

         This Bill of Sale shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the internal substantive laws of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Seller  has  caused  this Bill of Sale to be
executed as of the ______ day of February 1999.


                                          PowerTrader Software Inc.



                                           By:
                                               ---------------------------------

<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT "A"


         1. All  right,  title and  interest  in and to the  following  software
components:

              o    PowerTrader Pro-Vision

              o    PowerTrader Analyst

              o    Server

              o    Data Manager

              o    Formula One

              o    Financial Wire Internet Software

         2. All right, title and interest in and to the following tradenames and
registration thereof

              o    PowerTrader

              o    PowerTrader Analyst
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 07-cr-132-PB

Scott M. Annis

O R D E R

The defendant, through counsel, has moved to continue the

January 8, 2008 trial in the above case, citing the need for

additional time to negotiate a plea agreement or otherwise

prepare for trial. The government does not object to a

continuance of the trial date.

Accordingly, for the above reasons and to allow the parties

additional time to properly prepare for trial, the court will

continue the trial from January 8, 2008 to April 1, 2008. In

agreeing to continue the trial, the court finds pursuant to 18

U.S.C.A. § 3161(h)(8)(A) that for the above-stated reasons, the

ends of justice served in granting a continuance outweigh the

best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 9 Filed 12/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

The December 20, 2007 final pretrial conference is continued

to March 27, 2008 at 3:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED.

/s/Paul Barbadoro 

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge

December 20, 2007

cc: Bjorn Lange, Esq.

Arnold Huftalen, AUSA

United States Probation

United States Marshal

Case 1:07-cr-00132-PB Document 9 Filed 12/20/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02255-RPM

ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI,

Petitioner,

v.

BLAKE DAVIS, Warden, ADX-Florence,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER ALLOWING SURREPLY

_____________________________________________________________________

Upon review of Respondent’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Petitoner’s

Traverse [10] filed November 29, 2011, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted and Respondent’s Surreply to Traverse

attached thereto is accepted for filing.

DATED: November 30th, 2011

BY THE COURT:

s/Richard P. Matsch

__________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Case 1:11-cv-02255-RPM Document 11 Filed 11/30/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                 ------------

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
               ------------------------------------------------
                      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                      ----------------------------------
                      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      ---------------------------------

      In connection with the  Annual Report of Carrington  Laboratories, Inc.
 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006  as
 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I Carlton
 E. Turner, President and  Chief Executive Officer  of the Company,  certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S. C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant to S 906 of the Sarbanes-
 Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained  in the Report  fairly presents, in  all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the
 Company.


 Date:     April 2, 2007



 /s/ Carlton E. Turner
 ---------------------
 President and Chief Executive Officer
AGREEMENT made this 15th day of March 1997 by and between DIZON  INVESTMENTS
LIMITED,  a British  Virgin  Islands  Corporation  ("Dizon")  and OMAP  HOLDINGS
INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation.

    WHEREAS,  Dizon  owns all of the  issued  and  outstanding  common  stock of
American China Development Corporation (the "ACDC Stock"); and

    WHEREAS,  Dizon  wishes  to sell the ACDC  stock  to OMAP on the  terms  and
conditions set forth hereinbelow; and

    WHEREAS,  OMAP wishes to purchase the ACDC Stock from Dizon on the terms and
conditions set forth hereinbelow;

    NOW,  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of thE premises and promises  contained
herein the signatory parties agree hereto as follows:

      1.       Dizon  represents and warrants that it is the owner of all of the
               outstanding   stock  of  any  kind  issued  by   American   China
               Development Corporation ("American China");

      2.       Dizon represents and warrants that it is aware of no claim of any
               type or kind made as of the date hereof or  reasonably to be made
               hereinafter  by any person or entity  against  American  China or
               against Dizon's ownership of the ACDC Stock.

      3.       Dizon has all the rights,  corporate and otherwise, to enter into
               this Agreement pursuant to which the ACDC Stock is sold to OMAP.

      4.       Dizon  agrees to sell all of its  interest  in the ACDC  Stock to
               OMAP.  Dizon agrees that in addition to this  Agreement,  it will
               execute  all  such  documents  as may be  necessary  to  transfer
               ownership of the ACDC Stock to OMAP.

      5.       OMAP agrees to pay Dizon as the full and total purchase price for
               the ACDC  Stock  and Dizon  agrees  to  accept  from OMAP as full
               payment for the ACDC Stock 20,000,000  shares of the common stock
               of  OMAP  (the  "OMAP  Shares").  It is  agreed,  understood  and
               accepted  by Dizon and OMAP that the OMAP  Shares  when issued to
               Dizon will (a) not have been  registered  with the Securities and
               Exchange  Commission;  and (b) bear a restrictive  legend in form
               and  substance  advising  that the OMAP Shares  cannot be sold or
               otherwise  hypothecated  without either a registration  statement
               then  being in effect or an opinion  letter of counsel  that such
               registration need not be had.

      6.       All  representations  and  warranties set forth in this Agreement
               shall surmise the closing of the transaction contemplated hereby.

      7.       This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts.

      8.       This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seal the first day,
month and year above written.

DIZON INVESTMENTS LIMITED                            OMAP HOLDINGS INCORPORATED

By:/s/ Joyce Fayle                                   By: /s/ James Tilton
|Skip to ContentRelease dates | 
Historical data | 
DocumentationCurrent Monthly Release   Other formats: 
ASCII | 
PDF (144 KB)Supplemental Monthly Release 
  Other formats: 
ASCII | 
PDF (144 KB)Annual Revision Release 
  Other formats: 
ASCII | 
PDF (150 KB)








 Tables 6 and 7 Capacity Utilization and Industrial Capacity 
Documentation: These files include descriptions of all series in Tables 6 and 7 along with the
    codes that represent them in the data files.
    Tables 6 and 7: Capacity Utilization and Industrial Capacity
            Tables from the 
G.17 Supplement (previous format):
   
      Tables 3 and 4:  Capacity Utilization and Industrial CapacityData from January 1986 to presentCapacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and UtilitiesIndustrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and 
      UtilitiesData through 1985Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, Mining, and UtilitiesIndustrial Capacity: Manufacturing, Mining, and 
UtilitiesTables 1 and 2 | 
Table 3 | 
Tables 6 and 7 | 
Table 8 |  
Table 9 | 
Table 10 | 
All Tables  | 
Relative Importance Weights   
Statistical releasesHome | 
Economic research and dataAccessibility | 
Contact Us
Last update: September 3, 2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Kevin Sexton, et al

v.

Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., et al

Civil No. 07-cv-13-SM

O R D E R

The referenced case was removed from Rockingham County Superior Court on January 10,

2007.

It is hereby ordered that pursuant to LR 7.5 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, Defendant Resurgens

Specialty Underwriting, Inc. shall file a Disclosure Statement by February 17, 2007.

SO ORDERED.

January 22, 2007

cc: Edmond J. Ford, Esq.

Karyn P. Forbes, Esq.

Doreen F. Connor, Esq.

James C. Wheat, Esq.

Robert A. Benjamin, Esq.

/s/ Steven J. McAuliffe

Steven J. McAuliffe

Chief Judge

Case 1:07-cv-00013-SM Document 9 Filed 01/22/07 Page 1 of 1
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 12, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
BOBBY GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. ROBERT C. PATTON, Director DOC, Respondent - Appellee. No. 14-6192 (D.C. No. 5:13-CV-00756-M) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
Before GORSUCH , MURPHY , and HOLMES , Circuit Judges. After pleading guilty to state drug charges Bobby Green won a partially suspended sentence and probation. Soon, though, the state alleged that Mr. Green had committed more drug crimes, violating the terms of his probation and warranting revocation of his suspended sentence. Mr. Green sought to avoid this result, arguing that the government’s evidence against him stemmed from a Fourth Amendment violation and should be suppressed. The state court disagreed and proceeded to revoke Mr. Green’s suspended sentence. After failing to overturn this result on appeal in state court, Mr. Green sought habeas corpus

* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.relief in federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. But that court eventually denied Mr. Green’s requested relief, too, as well as his later request for a certificate of appealability. Mr. Green now renews his COA request before us, but before we may grant it he must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253. And that he has not done. As the district court explained, the Oklahoma courts afforded Mr. Green a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim — and in those circumstances federal courts are precluded from granting federal habeas relief on Fourth Amendment claims. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465, 494 (1976). Mr. Green separately contends that the Oklahoma trial court abused its discretion when it decided to revoke his suspended sentence in full rather than in part. But Mr. Green failed to pursue this argument in district court. Neither, in any event, does he seek to explain to us how the state court’s actions might violate the federal Constitution or laws, prerequisites to federal habeas relief. Mr. Green’s request for a COA is denied, as is his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and this appeal is dismissed. Mr. Green is reminded that he must pay the filing fee in full. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge

- 2 -
B.3. Net Charge-offs of Non-real-estate Farm Loans Held by Insured Commercial Banks
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
                                Estimated volume                 Share of total non-real-estate farm loans
                              (millions of dollars)                              (percent)
                      _____________________________________     ____________________________________________

Year                  Total     Q1      Q2      Q3      Q4      Total      Q1        Q2        Q3       Q4
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
                                                                                                            
1998......    |          87       4      15      24      45      .198      .008      .036     .051      .095
1999......    |         126      18      37      35      36      .280      .040      .086     .078      .080
2000......    |         108      11      17      34      45      .259      .027      .041     .075      .098
2001......    |         308      67      53     140      48      .656      .142      .118     .294      .101
2002......    |         221      40      50      58      73      .471      .085      .114     .124      .157
2003......    |         175      34      35      48      58      .382      .074      .080     .108      .128
2004......    |         129      28      17      46      38      .284      .062      .039     .099      .081
2005......    |          59       8      16      12      24      .124      .017      .035     .026      .048
2006......    |          73       9       7      23      34      .146      .018      .015     .045      .064
2007......    |          90       8      13      23      47      .170      .014      .025     .042      .085
2008......    |         150      12      20      42      75      .269      .022      .037     .074      .129
2009......    |         435      65      59     151     159      .743      .111      .108     .265      .271
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
   Note. Components might not sum to totals because of rounding. Reported amounts are adjusted to exclude
foreign results for large banks that report farm net charge-offs on a consolidated basis and for small banks
that are allowed to report net charge-offs according to their internal definition of agricultural loans.
Quarterly data are as of end of quarter.
   n.a. Not available.

23
B.7. Selected Measures of Financial Performance of Agricultural and Other Small Banks

Percent

Distribution of net income as a Average rate Rate N

share of average equity at of return of return 

agricultural banks on equity to assets 

25 percent Agri- Other Agri- Other A

Negative 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 and cultural Small cultural small cu

Period All banks income percent percent percent percent percent over banks Banks banks banks ba1996...... 100.0 2.1 5.6 33.4 41.6 14.2 2.6 .5 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1997...... 100.0 1.6 5.9 34.5 39.7 14.2 3.1 1.1 11.4 12.3 1.2 1.2 1998...... 100.0 2.0 8.7 35.6 35.5 13.4 3.5 1.3 11.3 11.7 1.2 1.2 1999...... 100.0 2.9 7.9 34.8 33.3 14.2 4.9 1.9 11.8 11.9 1.2 1.1 2000...... 100.0 2.4 8.9 35.3 33.5 13.8 4.2 1.8 11.7 11.4 1.2 1.1 2001...... 100.0 3.1 12.6 37.6 28.6 13.1 3.7 1.3 10.8 10.4 1.1 1.0 2002...... 100.0 3.0 10.7 35.1 31.4 13.5 4.6 1.7 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003...... 100.0 2.7 12.2 36.6 29.3 12.9 4.4 1.8 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004...... 100.0 2.1 10.0 34.9 31.4 13.8 5.8 2.0 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005...... 100.0 1.7 10.1 34.5 29.9 14.6 6.4 2.8 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006...... 100.0 2.7 10.9 35.7 30.1 13.1 4.6 2.8 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2002: Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.6 1.2 1.1 2003: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.0 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.5 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.2 10.7 1.2 1.1 2004: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.9 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.5 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.9 8.0 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.5 10.5 1.2 1.1 2005: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.9 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.9 5.6 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.3 .9 .8  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.8 10.7 1.2 1.1 2006: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 3.0 2.7 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 6.1 5.7 .6 .6  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 9.0 8.0 .9 .9  Q4... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 11.4 10.1 1.2 1.1 2007: Q1... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 2.8 2.3 .3 .3  Q2... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 5.7 4.6 .6 .5  Q3... n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. 8.4 6.6 .9 .7  Note. Agricultural and other banks are defined in the introduction to section B; small banks have less than $500 million in assets. Total primary anavailable at the end of the period specified) are measured as a percentage of total assets. Quarterly data are cumulative through the end of the quarte n.a. Not available.27